alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
iShares® Silver Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Latham, Chief Executive Officer of BlackRock Asset Management International Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: May 7, 2010



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Michael A. Latham                                                 
|Michael A. Latham *
Chief Executive Officer (Principal
executive officer)





|* | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Latham is signing in his capacity as an officer of BlackRock Asset Management International Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report of Independent Accountants

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of

GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion, dated February 23, 2004 about GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation's compliance with its established minimum master servicing policy ("Master Servicing Policy"), which management derived from the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I). Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the Master Servicing Policy. Our responsibility is to express an opinion about management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with the standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the Master Servicing Policy and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the Master Servicing Policy.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned Master Servicing Policy as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 23, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0377 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. BRANDON ANTHONY PERESSINI,

Defendant and Appellant,

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time until August 2 2 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening bri ef on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 11 2023

07/11/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0377
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LS POWER FUNDING CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              332,000,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             332,001,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    332,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               332,001,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,886,196
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          25,886,196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2099 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2099

          To suspend temporarily the duty on certain heaters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on certain heaters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN HEATERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Heaters (provided   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          for in subheading                                                  31/2011.......
                          8708.99.81)
                          certified by the
                          importer to warm
                          the interior and
                          windshield of
                          electrically
                          powered vehicles
                          of subheading
                          8703.90 in which
                          an on board
                          gasoline engine
                          is used to run a
                          generator that
                          recharges the
                          electric drive
                          motor battery....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2006250DE.01003502.xml

| 14.9.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 250/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 250/35

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1340/2006 vom 12. September 2006 über die Festsetzung des Umfangs, in dem die im August 2006 gestellten Anträge auf Einfuhrlizenzen für bestimmte Produkte des Sektors Geflügelfleisch entsprechend der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1233/2006 genehmigt werden können

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 249 vom 13. September 2006
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 249 vom 13. September 2006

Der Titel auf der Titelseite und auf der Seite 3 erhält folgende Fassung:

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the report of ToroVentures Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Yan Liu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Yan Liu                                   

Yan Liu, 

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 9, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2107 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2107

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women's leather or 
                  composition leather upper footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

   Mr. Bond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women's leather or 
                  composition leather upper footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN'S LEATHER OR COMPOSITION LEATHER UPPER 
              FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Footwear with       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        uppers of leather                                                  31/2011.......
                        or composition
                        leather, valued
                        at less than $20/
                        pair, for women
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        6405.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Alaska, Hugh Malone, in his Capacity as State Representative and Chairman of the Legislative Council of the State of Alaska, Legislative Council of the State of Alaska, Legislative Affairs Agency of the State of Alaska, and Myrton Charney, Executive Director of the Legislative Affairs Agency of the State of Alaska, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Robert DUPERE, President and Owner of Dupere & Associates, Inc., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Nos. S-620, S-640.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

July 11, 1986.

*639Virginia B. Ragle, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Harold M. Brown, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellants/cross-appellees.

Loren Domke, Juneau, for appel-lee/ cross-appellant.

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and BURKE, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ.

OPINION ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The State petitions for rehearing from our decision in *State v. Dupere,*709 P.2d 493 (Alaska 1985), urging us to reconsider our statement that Dupere would still have a “right to a *de novo*trial under AS 09.50.-250 if he disagreed with the administrative decision and brought suit within thirty days of the decision.” *Id.*at 497. We granted the petition and now modify our opinion.

The statement quoted above is inconsistent with our holding in *State v. Lundgren Pacific Construction,*603 P.2d 889 (Alaska 1979). In *Lundgren*we held that former Appellate Rule 451 applied to a claim filed in superior court after an adjudication before a contract claims review board and that such an action should be treated as an appeal of an agency decision. *Id.*at 892-93. Therefore, we take this opportunity to modify our opinion in this case as follows:

> It would be inefficient to annul the results of the trial and send Dupere back to the administrative level. Although Dupere would have been required to develop the facts of the claim during the administrative proceeding, the superior court would have had the discretion to order a trial *de novo*under Alaska Appellate Rule 609.2

1

. Former Appellate Rule 45 is now found in Appellate Rules 602 and 604. These rules govern the time, notice, and record of an appeal.

2

. This passage replaces the sentence at 709 P.2d at 497 which reads:

> It would be inefficient to annul the results of the trial and send Dupere back to the administrative level, since he would still have the right to a *de novo*trial under AS 09.50.250 if he disagreed with the administrative decision and brought suit within thirty days of the decision. AS 44.77.040(c).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1995 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1995

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain soap and lotion pumps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain soap and lotion pumps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SOAP AND LOTION PUMPS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Plastic or metal    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        hand-operated,                                                     31/2011.......
                        portable lotion
                        or soap pumps not
                        designed to be
                        affixed to a
                        wall, countertop
                        or cabinet
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8424.89.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.5
  AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE
LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
  AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT Amendment RFC GMACM Borrower Borrowers Lender
 PRELIMINARY STATEMENTS
 Loan and Security Agreement
  Amendments to the Loan and Security Agreement Section 2
 Attributed Rate
  Commitment Amount
 Commitment Amount
 Schedule II Exhibit A
 Conditions of Effectiveness




---



##### 



(i)
    
    The representations and warranties contained in
Section 4 hereof are correct on and as of the date of such
certificate as though made on and as of such date; and(ii)
    
    No event has occurred and is continuing that constitutes a Default.
 Reaffirmation of Security Interest
 Representations and Warranties of the Borrower
      2




---



##### 



Reference to and Effect on the Loan Documents
   Execution in Counterparts
 Governing Law
 3




---



##### 



GMAC LLC
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    /s/ David WalkerName:
    David WalkerTitle:
    Group VP and Treasurer RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
a Delaware limited liability companyBy
    /s/ Melissa WhiteName:
    Melissa WhiteTitle:
    Assistant Treasurer GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
a Delaware limited liability companyBy
    /s/ Melissa WhiteName:
    Melissa WhiteTitle:
    Assistant Treasurer [SIGNATURE PAGE  LSA AMENDMENT NO. 3]
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration June 8, 2016 Office of the Chief Counsel

BY CERTIFIED MAIL -RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED The Honorable DouglasM. Rawald Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 Re: In the matter ofOffshore Flight School, Inc; FDMS No. FAA-2014-0691 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 

# RECEIVED JUN 1 32016 HEARING DOCKET

I hereby file myNotice ofAppearance in this matter. Robert Spitzer, the attorney formerly assigned to this matter, is no longer with the Federal AviationAdministration. Going forward, I will be the attorney ofrecord and all communications for the Federal Aviation Administration should be addressed to Charles Raley, Senior Attorney, Enforcement Division/AGC-300, Office ofthe ChiefCounsel, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20591, (202) 267- 3357, facsimile (202) 267-5106. Sincerely,

Charles Raley, SeniorAttorney Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Telephone: (202) 267-3357 Facsimile: (202) 267-5106Cc by Certified Mail: David Glenn Bettencourt, Esq. Suite 304 Dillingham Transportation Building 735 Bishop Street Honolulu, HI 96813 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWrightBuilding- Suite 2WIOOO
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2151 

To suspend temporarily the duty on grocery bags with an exterior surface 

of nonwoven fabric wholly of polypropylene. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on grocery bags with an 

exterior surface of nonwoven fabric wholly of polypropylene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GROCERY BAGS WITH AN EXTERIOR SURFACE 

4 OF NONWOVEN FABRIC WHOLLY OF POLY5 PROPYLENE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2151 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Grocery bags with an exterior 

surface of nonwoven fabric 

wholly of polypropylene, of 

which the fabric comprising 

the outer surface of the bag 

is at least 70 grams per 

square meter and does not 

exceed 110 grams per square 

meter, with a foam insulation 

lining, with handles of 

nonwoven fabric wholly of 

polypropylene sewn on, with a 

capacity not to exceed 23 liters each, of a type used to 

carry food or beverages purchased in grocery stores, supermarkets or pharmacies or 

the like (provided for in subheading 4202.92.08) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Arthur Dulik, Jr., Respondent, v Charles Amante et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover commissions on the sales of three yachts, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McCarthy, J.), dated November 1, 1989, which, *inter alia,*granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

By an agreement dated October 8, 1985, the plaintiff and his wife sold their half interest in the corporate defendant, Eastern Yachts, Inc., back to the corporation. The plaintiff agreed to work for the business as an "independent salesman”. The agreement provided that on all sales originated by him, the plaintiff would earn a commission upon acceptance of the contract by the corporation and that one half of the commission would be paid upon acceptance of the contract and one half upon transfer of title. The plaintiff thereafter sold three yachts but the defendants refused to pay the full commissions due him and this action ensued.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the record presents no triable issue of fact as to the plaintiff’s entitlement to the commissions sought. The subject agreement was clear and unambiguous as to the conditions upon which the plaintiff would earn a commission. The plaintiff procured the buyers for the yachts and title closed on all three. As such, the plaintiff was entitled to the commissions claimed. The agreement simply did not provide for or even suggest any of the further conditions that the defendants would have this court read into the plain meaning of the contract terms.

Furthermore, the defendant Charles Amante signed the agreement twice—once as the corporate president and once in his individual capacity. We find that Charles Amante’s two signatures and the defendant Valerie Amante’s signature as an individual evidence their intent to be personally responsible for the payment of the plaintiff’s commissions under the terms of the agreement *(see, Salzman Sign Co. v Beck,*10 NY2d 63; *Mencher v Weiss,*306 NY 1; *Klapper v Integrated Agric. Mgt. Co.,*149 AD2d 765). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Brown and Balletta, JJ., concur.