alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1961 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1961

         To suspend temporarily the duty on certain alginates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

  Ms. Collins introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on certain alginates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ALGINATES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Alginic acid (CAS   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          No. 9005-32-7),                                                    31/2011.......
                          ammonium alignate
                          (CAS No. 9005-34-
                          9), potassium
                          alginate (CAS No.
                          9005-36-1),
                          calcium alginate
                          (CAS No. 9005-35-
                          0), and magnesium
                          alginate (CAS No.
                          37251-44-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3913.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Epidemiologic results presented in Tolbert et al. ( 2007)** 

**Reference:** Tolbert, P. E.; Klein, M.; Peel, J. L.; Sarnat, S. E.; Sarnat, J. A.(2007) Multipollutant modeling issues in a study of ambient air quality and emergenc y department visits in Atlanta. J Exposure Sci Environ Epidemiol . 17(Suppl. 2s): S29-S35.

Tables 1 and 2 present the risk ratios and 95% confiden ce intervals as presented in Figures 1 and 2 in Tolbert et al. (2007), including specification of th e IQRs used in estimating the risk ratios.

**Table 1. Effect estimates and 95% confidence interv als for selected multipollutant models for**  **combined cardiovascular diseases group, 1998–2004, corresponding to Figure 1 of Tolbert et al.**  **(2007). Models Pollutant(s) IQR RR per IQR (95% CI)** 

Single-pollutant CO 1.22 ppm 1.031 (1.016-1.046) NO 2 23 ppb 1.015 (1.002-1.029) PM 2.5 TC 3.63 μ g/m 3 1.017 (1.007-1.028)

Two-pollutant CO 1.22 ppm 1.035 (1.016-1.056) NO 2 23 ppb 0.994 (0.977-1.012)

CO 1.22 ppm 1.026 (1.007-1.046) PM 2.5 TC 3.63 μ g/m 3 1.005 (0.991-1.019)

NO 2 23 ppb 0.999 (0.980-1.018) PM 2.5 TC 3.63 μ g/m 3 1.018 (1.003-1.033)

Three-pollutant CO 1.22 ppm 1.031 (1.010-1.052) NO 2 23 ppb 0.988 (0.969-1.008) PM 2.5 TC 3.63 μ g/m 3 1.009 (0.994-1.025)

**Table 2. Effect estimates and 95% confidence interv als for selected multipollutant models for**  **combined respiratory diseases group, 1993–2004, cor responding to Figure 2 of Tolbert et al.**  **(2007). Models Pollutant(s) IQR RR per IQR (95% CI)** 

Single-pollutant CO 1.22 ppm 1.015 (1.005-1.024) NO 2 23 ppb 1.020 (1.010-1.029) PM 10 16.30 μ g/m 3 1.025 (1.016-1.035) O 3 34.38 ppb 1.044 (1.028-1.059)

Two-pollutant CO 1.22 ppm 1.004 (0.992-1.016) NO 2 23 ppb 1.017 (1.006-1.029)

CO 1.22 ppm 1.004 (0.993-1.014) PM 10 16.30 μ g/m 3 1.024 (1.014-1.034)CO 1.22 ppm 1.009 (0.999-1.019) O 3 34.38 ppb 1.040 (1.024-1.056)

NO 2 23 ppb 1.007 (0.996-1.018) PM 10 16.30 μ g/m 3 1.021 (1.010-1.033)

NO 2 23 ppb 1.010 (0.999-1.020) O 3 34.38 ppb 1.036 (1.019-1.054)

PM 10 16.30 μ g/m 3 1.016 (1.006-1.027) O 3 34.38 ppb 1.028 (1.010-1.047)

Three-pollutant NO 2 23 ppb 1.004 (0.992-1.015) PM 10 16.30 μ g/m 3 1.015 (1.003-1.027) O 3 34.38 ppb 1.027 (1.009-1.046)
|   | (1) |   | The Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended                  September 30, 2006 (the “Form 10-QSB”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |   |
|--------|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   | (2) |   | The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,                  in all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |   |
|--------|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|                                |                                                             |                       |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                                | **VALLEY FORGE COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**(Registrant)        |
|                                |                                                             |                       |
| Dated: November 13, 2006  | By:                                                    | /s/ Louis J. Brothers |
|                                | Louis J. Brothers                                                |
|                                | President, Secretary and Treasurer(Principal Accounting Officer) |

----
# L_2006249EN.01000501.xml

| 13.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 249/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 249/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1341/2006

of 12 September 2006

determining the extent to which applications lodged in August 2006 for import licences for certain poultrymeat sector products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1232/2006 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1232/2006 of 16 August 2006 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota of poultrymeat allocated to the United States of America (1) and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged for the period 1 July to 30 September 2006 are less than the quantities available and can therefore be fulfilled entirely,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 July to 30 September 2006 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1232/2006 shall be met as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

2.   Application for import licences for the period 1 October to 31 December 2006 may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1232/2006 for the total quantity as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 September 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 September 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 225, 17.8.2006, p. 5.

1

---

ANNEX

| Order No | Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period of 1 July to 30 September 2006 | Total quantity available for the period of 1 October to 31 December 2006
  (t) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 09.4169 | — | 8 332,500 |
| ‘—’ | : | No application for a licence has been sent to the Commission. |

Order No

Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period of 1 July to 30 September 2006

Total quantity available for the period of 1 October to 31 December 2006

(t)

09.4169

—

8 332,500

‘—’

:

No application for a licence has been sent to the Commission.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Emile Richardson, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin J.), rendered on December 14, 1988, convicting defendant upon a plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 4 Vi years to life, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*
      *27972 NY2d 918.) Concur—Carro, J. P., Milonas, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LSP-COTTAGE
GROVE L.P.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,502
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,416
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 257,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,273
<BONDS>                                        153,916
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,406
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   257,595
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,734
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,511
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,511
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,511
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2074 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of 3-bromo-4′-chloro-1-(3-chloro2-pyridyl)-2′-methyl-6′-(methylcarbamoyl)pyrazole-5-carboxanilide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of 3-bromo4′-chloro-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridyl)-2′-methyl-6′- 

(methylcarbamoyl)pyrazole-5-carboxanilide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF 3-BROMO-4′-CHLORO-1-(3- 

4 CHLORO-2-PYRIDYL)-2′-METHYL-6′- 

5 (METHYLCARBAMOYL)PYRAZOLE-5- 

6 CARBOXANILIDE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

9 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

10 new heading: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2074 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures of 3-bromo-4′- 

chloro-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridyl)- 

2′-methyl-6′- 

(methylcarbamoyl)pyrazole-5- 

carboxanilide 

(Chloroantraniliprole) (CAS 

No. 500008–45–7) and inert 

ingredients (provided for in 

subheading 3808.93.15) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

MOHAMMED MOOSAVI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

No. 99-6247

JAMES ZOOK, Director of Zoning

Administration, Zoning Enforcement

Branch,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge.

(CA-98-1780-A)

Submitted: April 30, 1999

Decided: May 25, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and

HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Mohammed Moosavi, Appellant Pro Se. James Patrick Taves,

Melissa Austin Long, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Fairfax,

Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Mohammed Moosavi appeals the order of the district court dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Moosavi,

a resident of Fairfax County, Virginia, seeks to compel James Zook,

the Director of Zoning Enforcement for Fairfax County, to address

alleged violations of the county zoning ordinance.

Federal trial courts are tribunals of limited jurisdiction dependent

upon statutory grants of jurisdiction from the Congress. See In re

Bulldog Trucking, Inc., 147 F.3d 347, 352 (4th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, a plaintiff must assert jurisdiction either by raising a question

based on the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States, see

28 U.S.C. § 1331 (1994), or by claiming jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship, see 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332 (West 1993 & Supp.

1998). See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1) (stating that pleadings shall

contain a statement of the grounds of jurisdiction).

Moosavi alleged no basis for jurisdiction, and we can find none

that supports his claims. Moosavi does not claim that the parties have

diversity of citizenship, and the information in the record tends to

refute this possibility. Furthermore, Moosavi raises no claims under

federal law or the Constitution.*

Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

_________________________________________________________________

*Because Moosavi failed to assert the subject matter jurisdiction of the

district court, his case is distinguishable from Pomponio v. Fauquier

County Bd. of Supervisors, 21 F.3d 1319 (4th Cir. 1994) (en banc),

overruled in part by Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. Co., 517 U.S. 706

(1996).

 2
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Peter Toscano, Chief Executive Officer, of International Power Group, Ltd. ( the Company ), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on 10Q/A of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 19, 2008







/s/ Peter Toscano

Peter Toscano

(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NewPage Holding Corporation and NewPage Corporation (the Companies) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George F. Martin, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Companies.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ George F. Martin   
|George F. Martin       
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 5, 2010
October 19, 2015

Mr. Ryan Worthen

DroneHoners

P.O. Box 55025

Lexington, KY 40555

Dear Mr. Worthen:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

part 21, Subpart H; §§ 45.23, 61.113, 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), 

and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we 

cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your, exemption request on behalf of DroneHoners filed in Docket 

No. FAA−2015−3070 on July 21, 2015, but we are unable to process your request any further. 

Your petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to 

consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21

<TABLE>
<S><C>
                              Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
                                t/k/a Star Holding Company               50%

    Meadowbrook,                                                                         American
       Inc.                                                                             Indemnity
                                                                                   Insurance Co., Ltd.
                                                                 Star                                        Crest Financial
                                                             Insurance Co.     (50%)                            Corporation

                                                                                                               Williamsburg
                                                             Savers Property                                     National
                                                              and Casualty                                     Insurance Co.
                                                              Insurance Co.
    Association                                                                                                  American
   Self Insurance                                                                                                 Highway
   Services, Inc.                                                                                          Carriers Association

    Meadowbrook                                                                                                   Liberty
  Intermediaries,                                                                                             Premium Finance,
       Inc.                                                                                                         Inc.

    Meadowbrook                                                                                                  Interline
       Risk                                                                                                  Insurance Services,
   Management, Inc.                                                                                                 Inc.

   Meadowbrook of                                                                                                Commercial
     Nevada, Inc.                                                                                           Carriers Insurance
                                                                                                                Agency, Inc.
    Meadowbrook
     Insurance
    Agency, Inc.

    Meadowbrook
       Risk
   Management, Ltd.
     (Barbados)

    Meadowbrook
  Risk Management
     Limited
    (Bermuda):
              (80%)

                       Meadowbrook
                   International, Ltd.

</TABLE>