alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w3



 





Exhibit 10.3




GUARANTEE



The undersigned hereby irrevocably and unconditionally guarantees, as a primary obligor and not
merely as a surety, to Sigma Opportunity Fund, LLC (“Buyer”), its successors and assigns, the full
and prompt payment of all amounts owing under the Note and any and all other sums and charges
payable by Berliner Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) to Buyer pursuant to the Transaction
Documents, and the full performance and observance of all of the covenants, terms, conditions and
agreements to be performed and observed by the Company pursuant to the terms of the Transaction
Documents.



This Guaranty is an absolute and unconditional guaranty of payment and performance. It shall be
enforceable against the undersigned without the necessity of any suit or proceeding on the part of
Buyer against the Company or any other party.



Except for the right to receive notice of default by the Company, the undersigned waives any
necessity of notice of nonpayment, nonperformance or nonobservance by the Company of any term or
provision of any of the Transaction Documents. This Guaranty shall not be discharged by reason of
any assignment or modification of the Transaction Documents or by any waiver or forbearance of the
Buyer of any of the terms of the Transaction Documents, the notice of all of which the undersigned
hereby waives.



The undersigned acknowledges that it will receive substantial direct and indirect benefits from the
transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents and that execution and delivery of this
Guarantee is a condition to the obligation of Buyer to consummate the transactions contemplated by
the Transaction Documents. The undersigned represents and warrants to Buyer that it has all right,
power and authority to enter into this Guarantee and perform its obligations hereunder and that
this Guarantee constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of the undersigned, enforceable
in accordance with its terms, except as may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, and other similar
laws of general application affecting the rights of creditors and by general equitable principles.



Capitalized terms used herein without definition are used as defined in the Note Purchase
Agreement, dated December 29, 2006, between Berliner Communications, Inc. and Buyer.



Dated: December 29, 2006




 









 








	 	 	 	 	 
	 	BCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Richard B. Berliner
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Richard B. Berliner 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 


Accepted and Agreed:



SIGMA OPPORTUNITY FUND, LLC




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Thom Waye
 

Name: Thom Waye
	 	 
	 

	 	Title: Managing Partner
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1867 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1867

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on phenyl isocyanate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on phenyl isocyanate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHENYL ISOCYANATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.14 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to phenyl isocyanate) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
World Airways, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-13575, No. 333-14461, No. 333-33704, No. 333-33706 and No. 333-14457) on
Form S-8 and registration statements (No. 333-39673, No. 333-35054 and No.
333-46406) on Form S-3 of World Airways, Inc. of our report dated March 19,
2002, except for Note 7, which is as of March 28, 2002, relating to the balance
sheets of World Airways, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' deficiency, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which
report appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of World
Airways, Inc.

Our report refers to a change, effective January 1, 2000, in the Company's
method of accounting for certain aircraft maintenance costs.


KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia
March 28, 2002
# L_2006023EN.01006301.xml

| 27.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 23/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 23/63

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 146/2006

of 26 January 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the import of sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 2094/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003, on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction from third countries in the duty on sorghum imported into Spain was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2094/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction from third countries in the duty on sorghum imported into Spain was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2094/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 20 to 26 January 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on imported sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 2094/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 January 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005 p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 335, 21.12.2005, p. 4.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1558/2005 (OJ L 249, 24.9.2005, p. 6).

3

---
### 2 The name and the address of the applicant are:

Suffolk Construction Company, Inc.

Wendy Venoit Vice President, General Counsel

PH: 617- 517-5351

65 Allerton Street
Boston, MA 02119
wvenoit@suffolk.com

Regulations from which the exemption is requested:

14 C.F.R. Part 21 14 C.F.R. 45.23 (b) 14 C.F.R. 61.113 (a) & (b) 14 C.F.R. 61.101 (e) (4) (5) 14 C.F.R. 61.23 (a) (c) 14 C.F.R. 61.315 (a) 14 C.F.R. 91.7 (a) 14 C.F.R. 91.9 (b) (2)

14 C.F.R. 91.103

14 C.F.R. 91.109

14 C.F.R. 91.119

14 C.F.R. 91.121 14 C.F.R. 91.151 (a) 14 C.F.R. 91.203 (a) & (b) 14 C.F.R. 91.405 (a) 14 C.F.R. 91.407 (a) (1) 14 C.F.R. 91.409 (a) (2) 14 C.F.R. 91.417 (a) & (b)

I. PUBLIC INTEREST & SAFETY BENEFITS

Suffolk has been privileged to work on some of the most recognizable and high profile construction projects in the nation, including part nerships with world renowned healthcare systems, distinguished universities, and private de velopers seeking to transform communities throughout the country with innovative construction projects. As a design build and construction management firm, Suffolk is responsible for managin g large complex construction sites. The use of sUAS would be beneficial for Suffolk’s inspections of projects during the preconstruction, construction and even the post construction phases to prevent conflicts, ensure quality, minimize risk and ensure safety of workers and the general p ublic.

The use of sUAS on construction sites supports Suff olk’s “Build Smart” approach, which utilizes innovation and technology to construct all projects regardless of size. Suffolk’s primary go al

for its use of sUAS is to reduce the risk of constr uction-related accidents while inspecting, surveyin g and monitoring the site, including inspections of r oof tops, building envelopes, and other areas of buildings that are otherwise inaccessible or can on ly be accessed with specialized equipment and at
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION





I, Robert Astore, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this amendment to the quarterly report on Form 10Q of International Power Group, Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:



a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c.

(c )Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the issuers  board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.









Date: February 8, 2008







/s/ Robert Astore



Robert Astore

(Chief Financial Officer

and Member of the Board of Directors)
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1890 

To suspend temporarily the duty on manganese flake containing at least 

99.5 percent by weight of manganese. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on manganese flake 

containing at least 99.5 percent by weight of manganese. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MANGANESE FLAKE CONTAINING AT LEAST 99.5 

4 PERCENT BY WEIGHT OF MANGANESE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Manganese flake containing 

at least 99.5 percent by 

weight of manganese (provided for in subheading 

8111.00.47) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1890 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
|Exhibit 23.1
|------------



|INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT
|-----------------------------



|We consent to the  incorporation  by reference
in  Registration  Statements  No.  333-61101,  as  amended;  No.  333-35051;  and No.
333-88216  of  Hearst-Argyle  Television,  Inc. on Form S-3, and in Registration
Statements No. 333-75709 and  No. 333-35043 of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. on Form
S-8, of our report dated  March  9,  2004,  which  expresses  an  unqualified  opinion
and  includes  an  explanatory  paragraph  relating  to the  change  in method  of
accounting  for  goodwill and other  intangible  assets,  appearing in this Annual Report
on Form  10-K of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|---------------------



|New York, New York  March 12, 2004
|----------------------------------



| |  | 
| |  | 



---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the Registrant) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David E. Snyder, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 17, 2010



/s/ David E. SnyderDavid E. Snyder
Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6339
ANTHONY EDWARD HENDERSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-2989-JFM) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 9, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Edward Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, O FFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Henderson v. Smith , No. CA-95-2989-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 29, 1996). We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Re Docket ID: EPA-HQ-Oq-2010-0505

Charles Langelier to: Nick Parsons 08/04/2010 12:29 AM

Dear Mr. Parsons:

I am writing to urge you to enact stricter regulations on oil and gas 

development in the Colorado Plateau . As a member of the medical and 

scientific community, I am deeply concerned by both the health impacts of 

climate change (which fossil fuel consumption will worsen ) as well as the 

potential for regional air quality compromise from drilling activities . 

Drilling units produce air pollutants including NOx , carbon monoxide and VOCs, 

and the increased diesel truck activity will also add to pollution . Without 

question, a much wiser solution would be to encourage renewable energy 

development on these lands, which receive substantial solar input and have 

adequate wind patterns.

Sincerely,

Chaz Langelier, PhD

3000 E Kennedy Drive #12

Salt Lake City, UT 84108
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1706 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1706

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber tow.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2009

 Mr. Barrasso introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber tow.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC FIBER TOW.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Acrylic fiber tow   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (polyacrylonitril                                                  31/2011.......
                        e tow) containing
                        by weight a
                        minimum of 98
                        percent
                        acrylonitrile,
                        not more than
                        30ppm sodium and
                        from 2 to 4
                        percent water,
                        imported in the
                        form of three sub-
                        bundles, each
                        containing 50,000
                        filaments and
                        with average
                        filament
                        measuring 1.2
                        decitex (plus or
                        minus
                        0.1)(provided for
                        in subheading
                        5501.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________ No. 08-3369

________________ Linda Downey, Appellant,

v. City of Carlisle, Iowa; Police Chief Ron Fox; City Manager Neil Ruddy; Officer Tom Bauler, Appellees. * * * * * * * * * * * Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. [UNPUBLISHED]

________________ Submitted: June 10, 2009 Filed: November 27, 2009

________________ Before BYE, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

________________ PER CURIAM. Linda Downey appeals the grant of su mmary judgment on her claims of sexual harassment, discrimination, and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e -17. At the time of her resignation from the Carlisle Police Department, Ms. Downey executed a br oad release that released and discharged the City of Carlisle and its employees from any claims related to her employment with the City of Carlisle. "A voluntary waiver of claims bars future action on such claims." Littrell v. City of Kansas City , 459 F.3d 918, 921 (8th Cir. 2006).1 The Honorable Ross A. Walters, United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of Iowa, presiding with the consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). -2- Summary judgment on Count VI, asserting discrimination claims under Title VII, was granted to the defe ndants based both on the broad terms of the release signed by Ms. Downey and the lack of admissibl e evidence to support the allegations. We have carefully reviewed de novo , see id. , the magistrate judge's 1 comprehensive memorandum and order, and we determine that an ex tended opinion would serve no precedential value. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________