alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Triple Crown Media, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterly period ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his individual knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 14, 2009



|        |  |                                      
|------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Signed: |  | /s/ ROBERT S. PRATHER, JR            
|        |  | Robert S. Prather, Jr.               
|        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, regardless of any general incorporation language in said filing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

906 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
that:

| |                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for
  the period ended August 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) The information contained in the accompanying
  Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
  results of operations of the Company.                           

|                        |                             
|----------------------- | ----------------------------
|Date: November 28, 2006 | /s/ David H. Roche          
|                        |                             
|                        | President and               
|                        | Chief Executive Officer     
|                        |                             
|                        | /s/ Steven M. Caspers       
|                        |                             
|                        | Executive Vice President and
|                        | Chief Financial Officer     

---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Genio Group, Inc. (the
"Company") for the nine months ended June 30th, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
Schenker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: Aug
19th 2009,
2009


/s/ Andrew Schenker


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2199 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2199

 To suspend temporarily the duty on poly(4-(1-isobutoxy ethoxy)styrene-
  co-4-hydroxystyrene) dissolved in propylene glycol monomethyl ether 
                                acetate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on poly(4-(1-isobutoxy ethoxy)styrene-
  co-4-hydroxystyrene) dissolved in propylene glycol monomethyl ether 
                                acetate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLY(4-(1-ISOBUTOXY ETHOXY)STYRENE-CO-4-HYDROXYSTYRENE) 
              DISSOLVED IN PROPYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Poly(4-(1-          Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        isobutoxy                                                          31/2011.......
                        ethoxy)styrene-co-
                        4-hydroxystyrene)
                        (CAS No. 199432-
                        82-1) dissolved
                        in propylene
                        glycol monomethyl
                        ether acetate
                        (CAS No. 70657-70-
                        4) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        3903.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Revised CPMS language 

 Bill Maxwell 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 11/15/2012 02:20 PM 

 Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Kevin Culligan 

 

Cortney -- 

Here is the revised CPMS language redlined against the version you now 

have. 

Thanks. 

CPMS language_redline_111512.docx 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The annual report of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 /s/ Walter E. Standish, IIIWalter E. Standish, IIIChief Executive OfficerMarch 31, 2009/s/ Gary S. AustinGary S. AustinChief Financial OfficerMarch 31, 2009
#### Banco do Commercio e Industria de Sao Paolo S.A., Respondent, v Esusa Engenharia e Construcoes S.A. et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered on or about April 18, 1990, which *341denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The individual defendants herein, citizens of Brazil, unconditionally agreed to guarantee payment of a promissory note executed by a now bankrupt Brazilian corporation, defendant Esusa Engenharia e Construcoes S.A. On this appeal, defendants argue that the New York courts lack personal jurisdiction over them and therefore may not adjudicate the action on the guarantee.

It is well settled that parties to an agreement may consent to submit to the jurisdiction of a court which would otherwise not have personal jurisdiction over them. *(Biener v Hystron Fibers,*78 NY2d 162.) Defendants unequivocally consented, in a 1978 agreement, that any action to enforce their obligations under the guarantee could be brought in any state or federal court sitting in the City of New York, and that the agreement would be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of New York. The record does not support defendants’ claims that the 1983 note gave rise to a novation which superceded the jurisdictional provisions of the earlier agreement.

Moreover, the legislature has specifically expressed its willingness that the courts of this state exercise jurisdiction over cases such as the one at hand. *(See,*General Obligations Law § 5-1402.) Thus, defendants, having agreed not only to submit to New York jurisdiction but to be governed by New York law, may not now argue that this action should be dismissed on the grounds that it is unduly burdensome to the court.

With respect to their claim of defective service, defendants admit that they were served with process in Brazil in accordance with the requirements of CPLR 308, and the papers submitted in support of the motion fail to rebut the affidavit of the process server, asserting that, as an officer of the court in Brazil, he was authorized to effect service of process.

The remaining arguments have been considered and found to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin, Wallach and Asch, JJ.
John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov’t Code 1

Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2008). 

NO. 07-07-0433-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

JULY 22, 2008

______________________________

JEREMY NATHAN BRISCOE, 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 64 DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY; TH

NO. A17331-0708; HON. ROBERT W. KINCAID, JR., PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., HANCOCK, J. and BOYD, S.J.1

Jeremy Nathan Briscoe was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon

upon his plea of guilt and sentenced by a jury to confinement for thirteen years and a fine

of $10,000. He timely filed his notice of appeal.
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). 2

2

Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, together with an

Anders brief wherein he certifies that, after diligently searching the record, he has 2

concluded that appellant’s appeal is without merit. Along with his brief, he has filed a copy

of a letter sent to appellant informing him of counsel’s belief that there was no reversible

error and of appellant’s right to file his own response if he wished to do so. By letter dated

February 6, 2008, this court also notified appellant of his right to tender his own response

and set March 7, 2008, as the deadline to do so. To date, we have received neither a

response nor a request for additional time to file a response. 

In compliance with the principles enunciated in Anders, appellate counsel discussed

one potential area for appeal. That involves the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence

to sustain the conviction. However, counsel reviewed the evidence presented at trial and

determined that no reversible error existed. Thereafter, we conducted our own review of

the record to assess the accuracy of appellate counsel’s conclusion and to uncover any

error pursuant to Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991), and concluded

the same. 

Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Brian Quinn 

 Chief Justice

Do not publish.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chelsea Therapeutics
International, Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Nick Riehle, Vice President, Administration and
Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ J. Nick RiehleJ. Nick RiehleVice President, Administration and Chief Financial OfficerMay 9, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the combined
balance sheet of Pegasus Media & Communications, Inc. as of December 31, 1999
and the related combined statement of operations for the year then ended. This
information is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          21,351
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,067
<INVENTORY>                                      9,506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,531
<PP&E>                                          66,487
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,646
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 593,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,696
<BONDS>                                         82,776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,000
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     242,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   593,464
<SALES>                                        209,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,870
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  279,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (219)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (86,549)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (86,649)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,128
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (84,521)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (497.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (497.18)


</TABLE>
See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 47. 4 ( di st i ngui shi ng o pi ni ons a nd m em or andum opi ni ons)

, 52. 8( d) ( “ W hen 1

de ny i ng rel i ef, t he co urt m ay ha nd do w n a n o pi ni on bu t i s no t requ i red t o d o s o.” ) 

### NUM BER 13-09- 0014 1-CR



## COURT OF A PP EA LS

T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS

CORPUS CHRI ST I

- E DI NBURG

IN RE: FRIZO VA LERO

On Peti tion for Wr it of Pr ohibit ion



## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON

B ef o re C h ie f Ju st ic e Va ld ez a n d J u st ic es G ar za a n d V el a

M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam 1

Rel ator

, Fr iz o Val er o, ha s fil ed a peti ti on for w ri t of pr ohi bit ion by w hic h he re q uest s

that thi s Cour

t dir ect respo ndent, the Hon or abl e Eli a Cor nej o Lopez , pres idi ng j udg e of the

404th Judi ci al Di str ic t C our t of C amero n C ounty , Tex as, to v acat e her Ja nuar y 28, 2009

or der g ra nti ng the Stat e’s “ Mo ti on for Rec onsi der ati on and to V o id O rd er s M odi fyi ng

Pr obati on J udg ment and D is mis si ng C har g es. ” On Ma rc h 17, 2009, w e req uest ed the r eal

par ty i n i nter est , t he St ate o f Texa s, by and thr oug h the C ri minal D istrict Atto rn ey i n and

for C amero n C ounty , Tex as, to file a r espon se to r ela tor ’s peti ti on. T h e S ta te f ile d a

re spons e on Ma rc h 31, 2009.

Hav ing r ev iew ed and fully cons ide re d the re lat or ’s peti ti on for w ri t of pr ohi bit ion and

the S tate’ s r espon se ther eto, thi s Cour t i s o f the opi nio n tha t t he r ela tor i s n ot en ti tl ed to2

the re li ef s oug ht and that the peti ti on shoul d be deni ed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52 .8(a).

Accordin gly , the petitio n f or w rit of prohibitio n is DENIED.

PER C UR IAM

Do not p ubl is h.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47 .2(b).

Me moran dum opi nio n del iv er ed and

filed thi s t he 1s t day

of Apr il , 200 9.
Exhibit 10.4
  AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
  AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT Amendment RFC GMACM Borrower Borrowers Lender
 PRELIMINARY STATEMENTS
 Loan and Security Agreement
  Amendments to the Loan and Security Agreement Section 2
 Servicing Contracts
 Servicing Contract Schedule II
 Schedule II Exhibit A




---



##### 



Conditions of Effectiveness
   (i)
    
    The representations and warranties contained in
Section 4 hereof are correct on and as of the date of such
certificate as though made on and as of such date; and(ii)
    
    No event has occurred and is continuing that constitutes a Default.
 Reaffirmation of Security Interest
 Representations and Warranties of the Borrower
     2




---



##### 



Reference to and Effect on the Loan Documents
   Execution in Counterparts
 Governing Law
 3




---



##### 



GMAC LLC
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    /s/ David WalkerName:
    David WalkerTitle:
    Group VP and Treasurer RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
a Delaware limited liability companyBy
    /s/ John PetersonName:
    John PetersonTitle:
    Treasurer GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
a Delaware limited liability companyBy
    /s/ William F. Casey IIIName:
    William F. Casey IIITitle:
    Treasurer [SIGNATURE PAGE  LSA AMENDMENT NO. 2]




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 SCHEDULE II
 Title of Agreement
    
    Parties
    
    Date
# L_2006220EN.01001301.xml

| 11.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 220/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 220/13

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1219/2006

of 10 August 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 4 to 10 August 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 August 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 August 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 6.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---