alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1952 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Firestorm. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. ISAKSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Firestorm. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIRESTORM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures of 1,1′-dimethyl4,4′-bipyridinium dichloride 

(CAS No. 1910–42–5) (provided for in subheading 

3808.93.15) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1952 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00155-CR

Reynaldo Rovira

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 18FC-5248G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 18, 2024
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1904 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain refracting and 

reflecting telescopes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. ROBERTS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

refracting and reflecting telescopes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN REFRACTING AND REFLECTING TELE4 SCOPES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.86 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain refracting and reflecting telescopes) is amended by 

8 striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1904 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of 

3 this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), the undersigned officers of HarborAcquisition Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best oftheir knowledge:

1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2007, to which this Certification is attached asExhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2. The information contained in the QuarterlyReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

**InWitness Whereof,**the undersigned have set their hands heretoas of August 14, 2007.
| /s/ Robert J. Hanks                            |     |
|------------------------------------------------|----------|
| *Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer*        | * * |
| *Principal Executive Officer*                  | * * |
|                                           |     |
| /s/ Todd A. Fitzpatrick                        |     |
| *Vice President*                               | * * |
| *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* | * * |

 

Thiscertification accompanies this Quarterly Report to which it relates, is notdeemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.

20

----
John T . Boy d, C hi efJust i ce ( R et . ) , Sev ent h Cour t of Appeal s, si t t i ng by assi gnm ent . T ex. G ov ’ t C ode 1 A n n . § 7 5 .0 0 2 (a )( 1 ) (V e rn o n S u p p . 2 0 0 8 ). NO. 07-07 -043 3-CR IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL E JU LY22, 2008

_________

_________

_________

___ JER EM YN ATHAN BR ISC OE, Appel lan t

v. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, Appel lee

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 64 DIS T RI CT COU RT OF HA L E CO UNT Y; TH NO. A17 331 -070 8; HON. ROBERT W . KINCAID, JR., PRESI DING

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., HANCOCK, J. and BOYD, S.J. 1 JeremyN athan Br is coe w as conv ic ted o f ag g ra v ated ass aul t w it h a deadl y w eapon upon hi s p lea of g uil t and se ntenc ed by a j ur y to confine ment for thi rt een y ears a nd a fine of $10 ,00 0. He time ly

f iled his not ice of

app eal.S e e A n d e rs v . C a lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8, 74 4-4 5, 87 S . C t . 13 96 , 18 L. E d.2d 49 3 (19 67 ). 2 2 Appel lant’ s a p p oin ted c ounse l has filed a mot ion to w it hdraw , t og ether w it h an And ers br ief w herein he cer ti fies that, after

di li g entl y

se ar chi ng the re cord, he has 2 conc lud ed th at ap pel lan t’ s a ppeal i s w it hout meri t. Al ong w it h his br ief, he has fil ed a copy of a letter sen t t o app ellantinformin g him of coun sel’s belief

thatthere was no rev ersible er ro r and of appel lan t’ s r ig ht t o fil e hi s o w n respon se if he w is hed to do so. By let ter date d Februa ry 6, 200 8, th is court also no tif ied app ellantof his ri ght to ten der his own respo nse and s e t M a rch 7, 200 8, as th e de adline to do so . To date , w e ha v e received neith er a re spons e nor

a req uestfor a ddi ti onal ti me to file a respon se. In c ompli ance w it h the pr inc ipl es enunc iat ed i n And ers , app ell ate c ounse l dis cus sed one pote ntial area for a ppe al. T hatin v olves th e legal a nd factu al suf f iciency of

t he e v iden ce to s ust ain the conv ic ti on. How ev er , couns el rev iew ed the ev ide nce pr esent ed attr ial and deter m in e d thatno rev ersi ble er ro r ex is ted. Ther eafter, w e c onduc ted o ur ow n rev iew

of the record to ass ess the acc uracy of appel lat e c ounse l’ s c oncl usio n a n d to uncov er any er ro r pursuantto Staf

for d v . St ate, 813 S. W .2d 503 (Tex . Cr im. App. 1991) , and co ncl uded the s ame. Acc ordin g ly , t he moti on to w it hdraw i s g ra nted and t he j udg ment i s a ff ir med. Br ian Qui nn Chief Justice Do not p ubl is h.
#### L.E. PURSELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Durrell HULL and Neda Hull, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 84CA1034.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

Sept. 19, 1985.

Harden, Schmidt & Hass, P.C., Jeannine S. Haag, Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

William G. Kaufman, Denver, for defendants-appellants.

STERNBERG, Judge.

This is an appeal from the grant of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse and remand with directions.

Plaintiff, a landlord, commenced this action seeking $2,410.02 for breach of a lease by his tenants, the defendants. The defendants timely filed an answer and counterclaim. On April 26, 1984, plaintiff mailed the defendants a copy of “Plaintiff’s First Request for Admissions and Interrogatories to Defendants.” Then, on June 12, 1984, plaintiff filed with the court a motion for summary judgment, together with a brief and affidavit, alleging, *inter alia,*that the defendants had failed to respond to the request for admissions and interrogatories and contending that therefore the requests for admissions should be deemed admitted.

On June 25, 1984, the defendants filed their answers to plaintiff’s interrogatories and request for admissions. They also filed a motion for extension of time and to permit late filing of denial of admissions, alleging a need for additional time to secure affidavits to oppose the summary judgment motion. They therefore requested that an extension be granted to August 1, 1984. Plaintiff objected to the late filing of the admissions and request for extension of time to August 1, 1984; however, he stated that he had no objection to granting defendants an extension of time to July 12, 1984, in which to respond to the motion for summary judgment.

On July 12, 1984, the trial court issued an order permitting the late filing of defendants’ response to the requests for admissions and interrogatories, denying defendants’ motion for extension of time in which to respond to the motion for summary judgment, and granting plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

*491The defendants contend that the trial court erred in denying their motion for additional time within which to respond to plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. We agree.

The trial court did not deny the defendants’ motion for extension of time until July 12, 1984, the date on which summary judgment was granted. The failure to rule on defendants’ motion until the date the trial court granted summary judgment and the subsequent denial of the motion for extension of time constituted an abuse of discretion by the trial court. *See Mitchell v. Espinoza,*125 Colo. 267, 243 P.2d 412 (1952).

The summary judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to enter an order granting defendants a reasonable amount of time within which to respond to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment after which the court may consider the motion.

SMITH and VAN CISE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


I, Robert Gelfand, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Wallace Mountain
      Resources Corp.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this quarterly report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
      quarterly report;

4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
      registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
      auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
      persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.    I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
      significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
      significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
      recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
8th day of December, 2005.


/s/ Robert Gelfand
----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caribou Coffee Company, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael J. Coles, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 14, 2005


                                         /s/ Michael J. Coles
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Michael J. Coles
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  William  Iny,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial
Officer of Sky Harvest Windpower Corp. (the "Company") hereby certifies pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     (a)  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
          February 28, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements
          of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),  as  applicable,  of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (b)  the  information  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: April 14, 2011


By: /s/ William Iny
   ---------------------------------------------------
   William Iny
   Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
   Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
# L_2006282EN.01003601.xml

| 13.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 282/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 282/36

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1526/2006

of 12 October 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 6 to 12 October 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 October 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Johannes T. Petersen, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Director of Century Petroleum Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Century Petroleum
Corp. for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Century Petroleum Corp.

Dated: December 17, 2007

/s/ Johnannes T. PetersenJohannes T.
PetersenChief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director (Principal
Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Century
Petroleum Corp. and will be retained by Century Petroleum Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Black Nickel Acquisition Corp. III
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul
      T.
      Mannion, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Paul T. Mannion, Jr.Paul
                T. Mannion, Jr.
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              May
                11, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of Reporting Requirements Submitted for OMB Review.

# SUMMARY:

                        Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         notifying the public that the agency has made such a submission.                    

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before April 12, 2012. If you intend to comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline.

# COPIES:

Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the Agency Clearance Officer.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Address all comments concerning this notice to:                         *Agency Clearance Officer,*                         Curtis Rich, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and                         *OMB Reviewer,*                         Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Curtis Rich, Agency Clearance Officer, (202) 205-7030.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Title:*                     “SBA Lender Microloan Intermediary and NTAP Reporting Requirements”.                

*Frequency:*                     On Occasion.                

*SBA Form Number:*                     N/A.                

*Description of Respondents:*                     SBA Microloan Lenders.                

*Responses:*                     170.                

*Annual Burden:*                     1,700.                

Curtis Rich,

Management Analyst.

[FR Doc. 2012-5958 Filed 3-12-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P