alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4935]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Bioabsorbable Stents for Pediatric Pulmonary 
Artery Stenosis and Aortic Coarctation.
    Date: March 16, 2012.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Tony L Creazzo, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7180, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7924, 301-435-0725, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f89b8a9d998282978c94b895999194d6969190d69f978e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e7d6c7b7f6464716a725e737f77723070777630797168">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 22, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-4935 Filed 2-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14504-14505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of California, Davis, et al.; Notice of Decision on 
Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). 
Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 
3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 11-072. Applicant: University of California, Davis, 
NEAT ORU, One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616. Instrument: Alexsys 1000 
Calorimeter. Manufacturer: Setaram Instrumentation, France. Intended 
Use: See notice at 77 FR 5768, February 6, 2012. Comments: None 
received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, for such 
purposes as

[[Page 14505]]

this is intended to be used, that was being manufactured in the United 
States at the time of order. Reasons: This instrument is unique in that 
it combines the sensitivity, long life, and reproducibility of 
thermopile sensors with a large internal working volume capable of 
containing the molten oxide solvents used for calorimetry and operating 
in the range 700-1000 degrees Celsius where such solvents are molten. 
Conventional differential scanning calorimeters, made by other 
companies, are completely different in design and do not feature the 
large sample volume surrounded by a sensitive detector that is 
essential for solution calorimetry.
    Docket Number: 12-001. Applicant: The Regents of the University of 
California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road M/S 
71R0259, Berkeley, CA 94720. Instrument: Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator 
``BELLA'' 1.3 petawatt laser system. Manufacturer: Thales Optronique 
S.A., France. Intended Use: See notice at 77 FR 5768, February 6, 2012. 
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments 
of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described 
below, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time of order. Reasons: 
Requirements of this system include that it is characterized by a short 
pulse, high intensity, Ti:sapphire laser able to demonstrate a 10 GeV 
laser-plasma accelerator module with a pulse energy of 40 Joules on 
target and a pulse duration of <40 femtoseconds at optimum compression 
with a repetition rate of 1HZ <plus-minus> 5%.

     Dated: March 5, 2012.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-5917 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 4, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Michael
J. ThorneMichael J. ThorneSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 12, 2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 98-4080 COLIN MASSIAS, a/k/a Jamaican C, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr., Senior District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-94-148-V) Submitted: March 16, 1999 Decided: March 30, 1999 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELTerry F. Rose, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Mark T. Calloway, United States Attorney, Frank D. Whitney, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM:Colin Massias appeals his conviction and sentence after a conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994). We affirm. The Government's evidence showed that Massias was involved in a conspiracy that bought powder cocaine and cooked it into crack cocaine for distribution. Massias often supervised the cooking of the cocaine into crack and also served as security for the conspiracy. The court originally sentenced Massias to 160 months' imprisonmentbased only on distribution of powder cocaine. Upon the Government's appeal, this Court vacated Massias' sentence, and remanded for resentencing with instructions for the sentencing court to consider the substantial evidence that Massias trafficked in crack. See United States v. Massias , No. 96-4577 (4th Cir. May 30, 1997) (unpublished). After considering this evidence, the court resentenced Massias to 324 months' imprisonment. Massias timely appealed. Massias contends that he received ineffective assistance of c ounsel in numerous ways. Because the record does not conclusively show ineffective assistance of counsel, we decline to consider this issue on direct appeal. See United States v. Smith , 62 F.3d 641, 650-51 (4th Cir. 1995). Further, the evidence was more than sufficient to support the district court's finding that a conspiracy existed, of which Massias was a part, and that the co-conspirators' statements admitted at trial were made in the course of and in furtherance of the conspiracy; therefore, the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting these statements. See Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(E); United States v. Neal , 78 F.3d 901, 904-05 (4th Cir. 1996).We therefore affirm Massias' conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately set forth in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
----

----

| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November      10, 2008 | /s/      David J. Bryant                                  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                   | David      J. Bryant                                      |
|                   | Chief      Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer |
|                   |                                                      |

----

----
# L_2006120EN.01000901.xml

| 5.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 120/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 120/9

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 687/2006

of 4 May 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 25th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 25th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 27,802 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 May 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 May 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 185, 16.7.2005, p. 3.

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1973 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1973

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on suspension system 
                            stabilizer bars.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on suspension system 
                            stabilizer bars.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION SYSTEM STABILIZER BARS.

    (a) In General.--Subheading 9902.25.77 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to suspension system stabilizer 
bars) is amended--
            (1) in the effective period column, by striking ``12/31/
        2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2012''; and
            (2) by striking the article description and inserting the 
        following: ``Suspension system stabilizer bars of alloy steel, 
        each weighing approximately 42 kg, the forgoing comprising one 
        horizontal rod 98.8 cm in length at each end of which is welded 
        at approximately right angles of a rod measuring approximately 
        51 cm in length, designed for use in Class 7 and 8 trucks only, 
        certified by the importer as of Japan grade SCM 525S (26CrMo4) 
        or SCM435H (34CrMo4) steel (provided for in subheading 
        8708.80.65)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respects to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. William J. MICHALCEWICZ, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 19976.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Dec. 17, 1985.

Ronald J. Yengich, Salt Lake City, for defendant-appellant.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Dave B. Thompson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff-respondent.

HOWE, Justice:

Defendant appeals from a conviction of manslaughter, a second degree felony, in violation of U.C.A., 1953, § 76-5-205(l)(a).

On March 18, 1983, defendant drove his automobile south in one of the northbound lanes of Interstate Highway 15. He collided with an oncoming automobile, seriously injuring the driver and killing a passenger. Investigating officers noticed that defendant’s vehicle contained beer bottles and smelled strongly of alcohol. He was taken to a hospital, where a blood test was performed. The result was that he had a blood alcohol level of .19 by weight, well over the statutorily presumptive level of .08. He was charged with second degree murder, but the jury convicted him of the lesser included offense of manslaughter.

Defendant assails his conviction, contending that the trial court erred in failing to honor his request to give an instruction on vehicular homicide, a class A misdemeanor, under U.C.A., 1953, § 41-6-43.10:

> (a) When the death of any person ensues within one year as a proximate result of injury received by the driving of any vehicle in reckless disregard of the safety of others, the person so operating such vehicle shall be guilty of negligent homicide.

As we pointed out in the recent case of *State v. Bryan,*11 Utah Adv.Rep. 41 (Nov. 27, 1985), the required *mens rea*
      *254for vehicular homicide and for manslaughter are the same, *viz.,*recklessness. In view of that duplication, we held that the defendant’s conviction of manslaughter could not stand, and we reversed the conviction and remanded the case for sentencing in accordance with section 41-6-43.10 (vehicular homicide). That case is controlling here, and the same result must obtain.

Defendant’s conviction of manslaughter is reversed, and this case is remanded to the trial court to sentence defendant under section 41-6-43.10.

HALL, C.J., and STEWART, DURHAM and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1996 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1996

       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain swimming pools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain swimming pools.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SWIMMING POOLS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Children's          Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        inflatable                                                         31/2011.......
                        swimming pools of
                        polyvinyl
                        chloride not
                        exceeding 1.651
                        meters in
                        diameter
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        9506.99.55)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steve J. Cannon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DynCorp International LLC;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant and its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
as of the period covered by this quarterly report, based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this quarterly report
any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/    STEVE J.
CANNONSteve J. CannonPresident and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)February 21, 2006
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Court for the District of 1

Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2187

___________

United States of America, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Rafael Ramon Williams, *

also known as Felly, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Defendant - Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: December 12, 1997

Filed: December 18, 1997

___________

Before MURPHY, JOHN R. GIBSON, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Rafael Ramon Williams pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute and

to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base (crack) in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§

841(a)(1), 846, and was sentenced to 216 months. Williams appeals, challenging the

four level enhancement applied to his sentence by the district court for being an

1

organizer or leader of a conspiracy involving five or more participants. See U.S.S.G.

§ 3B1.1(a). After reviewing the record, we conclude that it supports the findings of the
-2-

district court regarding Williams' role in the conspiracy. Accordingly, we affirm the

judgment.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT