alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Louis J. Brothers, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify to my knowledge that:


| |     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | 
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | (1) |  | The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the Form 10-Q)  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and | 




| |     |  |                                                                                                                                                         | 
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. | 




|                      |                                                                  |                      
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------
|                      |                                                                  |                      
|                      | VALLEY FORGE COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Registrant)          
|                      |                                                                  |                      
|Date: August 13, 2009 | By:                                                              | /s/ Louis J. Brothers
|                      | Louis J. Brothers                                               
|                      | President, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer)
# L_2006054EN.01000801.xml

| 24.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 54/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 54/8

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 325/2006

of 23 February 2006

fixing the reduction coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences for bananas originating in the ACP countries for the period 1 March to 31 December 2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1964/2005 of 29 November 2005 on the tariff rates for bananas (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 219/2006 of 8 February 2006 opening and providing for the administration of the tariff quota for bananas falling under CN code 0803 00 19 originating in ACP countries for the period 1 March to 31 December 2006 (2), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The applications for import licences submitted in the Member States under Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 219/2006 and sent to the Commission in accordance with Article 5 of that Regulation exceed the available quantities fixed in Article 2(a) thereof, i.e.146 850 tonnes for the operators referred to in Chapter II. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The applications for import licences submitted in the Member States under Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 219/2006 and sent to the Commission in accordance with Article 5 of that Regulation exceed the available quantities fixed in Article 2(a) thereof, i.e.146 850 tonnes for the operators referred to in Chapter II.

| (2) | The reduction coefficient to be applied to each application should therefore be fixed, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The reduction coefficient to be applied to each application should therefore be fixed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

A reduction coefficient of 45,687 % shall be applied to each import licence application submitted by the operators referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 219/2006 under the tariff subquota of 146 850 tonnes.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 February 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 316, 2.12.2005, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 38, 9.2.2006, p. 22.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                          5

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                             331,057
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      671,259
<ALLOWANCES>                       167,497
<INVENTORY>                        127,091
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   961,910
<PP&E>                             3,720,667
<DEPRECIATION>                     2,905,582
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     9,537,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              7,412,185
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        10
<COMMON>                           23,833
<OTHER-SE>                         831,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       9,537,472
<SALES>                            378,677
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   378,677
<CGS>                              71,810
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      7,115,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   195,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   384,013
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 103,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (7,491,287)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (7,433,899)
<DISCONTINUED>                     (428,569)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (7,862,468)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.40)
<FN>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</FN>



</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

AXEL INOSTROZA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3369

[May 16, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Ilona Maxine Holmes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-

004650CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Kai Li Aloe Fouts, Special 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
exhibit101.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing





EXHIBIT 10.1

 

 

January 10, 2007

Geostar Minerals Corporation

706-15038 101 Avenue

Surrey, British Columbia 

Canada V3R 0N2



Ladies and Gentlemen:



RE: South Ridge

     Pursuant to an agreement between Geostar Minerals Corporation and Andriy Protskiv dated November 3, 2006, Andriy Protskiv, the owner of the claims, will hold in trust for Geostar Minerals Corporation, a 100% undivided interest in the subject claims under the terms of the agreement:

	Claim  	Number of Units  	Record Number  	Expiration Date  
	South Ridge  	4  	519328  	November 1, 2007  




     Andriy Protskiv will deliver full title on demand to Geostar Minerals Corporation when all terms and conditions have been met regarding the aforementioned agreement.



Yours truly,

ANDRIY PROTSKIV

Andriy Prostskiv
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1891 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1891

    To suspend temporarily the duty on standard grade ferroniobium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on standard grade ferroniobium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STANDARD GRADE FERRONIOBIUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Ferroniobium        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (provided for in                                                   31/2011.......
                          subheading
                          7202.93.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Israel Nunez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul P. E. Bookson, J.), rendered on April 24, 1987, convicting defendant of murder in the second degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Ross and Smith, JJ.
EXHIBIT 13.1



906 CERTIFICATION



October 12, 2010



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington,
D.C. 20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with
amendment to the Telecom Italia S.p.A. Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Franco Bernabè, the Chief Executive Officer, and Andrea Mangoni, the Chief Financial Officer, of Telecom Italia S.p.A., each certifies that,
to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Telecom Italia S.p.A..
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    FRANCO
BERNABÈName:

Franco BernabèTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


By:

/s/     ANDREA
MANGONIName:

Andrea MangoniTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Lynda Sawyer, Petitioner, v Peter Phelan, as Commissioner of the St. Lawrence County Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Crew III, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent State Commissioner of Social Services which denied petitioner an additional child care allowance.

In 1988 petitioner was the recipient of a full grant of Aid to Families with Dependent Children from the St. Lawrence County Department of Social Services (hereinafter DSS) in order that she could take and complete an eight-week training program which prepared her to be a nursing assistant. Upon completion of her training, petitioner participated in a field work component of the program where she assisted nurses in actual treatment of patients. She quickly discovered that viewing blood, open wounds and dying patients caused her to experience nausea and faintness. Consequently, she enrolled at Mater Dei College for the fall term of 1988 in a liberal arts program with the intention of becoming an alcohol and chemical dependence counselor. On November 4, 1988, while so enrolled, petitioner applied for an additional child care allowance from DSS. Her application was denied on December 5, 1988 on the grounds that she was in a liberal arts curriculum and that DSS policy prohibited approval of such an allowance for successive training programs. Following a fair hearing, the State Department of Social Services (hereinafter SDSS) affirmed that determination on the ground that DSS could not *995approve petitioner for a second or successive training program. The DSS policy upon which SDSS relied provided that in order to qualify for assistance a program must be occupational, the applicant must maintain a 2.0 grade point average and DSS shall not approve successive training programs. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the administrative determination.

The record reflects that the policy of DSS regarding ineligibility for successive training programs was not filed with SDSS until March 1989. It is clear, therefore, that the policy was not in effect at the time petitioner was denied the additional allowance and it could not constitute a legal basis for such denial *(see, Matter of Burkitt v Blum,*72 AD2d 890). The determination must therefore be annulled and the petition granted.

Determination annulled, without costs, petition granted and matter remitted to respondent State Commissioner of Social Services for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court’s decision. Mahoney, P. J., Mikoll, Levine, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Solely for the purpose of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may be applicable to this report, the undersigned hereby certify that this report of Z Yachts, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |                      |                                       |  |  | 
|------------------- | -------------------- | ------------------------------------- |  |  | 
|                    |                      |                                      
|Dated: May 15, 2006 | /s/ James G. Weller  |                                      
|                    | Name:                | James G. Weller                      
|                    | Title:               | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                    |                      |                                      
|                    |                      |                                      
|                    | /s/ Regina F. Weller |                                      
|                    | Name:                | Regina F. Weller                     
|                    | Title:               | Chief Financial Officer              
|                    |                      |                                       |  |  | 



1
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Mark F. O’Neil, certify that:     (1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DealerTrack Holdings, Inc.;     (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     (5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Mark F. O’Neil   Mark F. O’Neil  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer     May 9, 2007
# L_2006298EN.01002001.xml

| 27.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 298/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 298/20

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1603/2006

of 26 October 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 20 to 26 October 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 October 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 6.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---