alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
TORO VENTURES INC.
FORM 10-Q FOR THE  THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joe Arcaro, am the
Chief Executive Officer of Toro Ventures Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three month period ended September 30,
2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|Date: June 17, 2013                                                                     
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: /s/ Joseph Arcaro
        Joseph Arcaro
        Chief Executive Officer and Director
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

Appellate case name: In re Baylor College of Medicine

, Relator

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 9

- 00 1 0 5

- C V

Trial court case number: 20 1 7

- 49635

Trial court: 1 6 5 th District Court of H a rri s County

On February 13, 2019 , r elator, Baylor College of Medicine, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the respondent trial judge to rule on its pending motion to dismiss for failure to timely serve an expert report, pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 74.351. Although r elator included a Rule 52.3(j) certification with its appendix and filed a separate record , it did not attach the reporter’s record for the May 3, 2018 motion hearing or state that no testimony was adduced. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.3(j), (k) , 52.7(a)(1) , (2)

. A ccordingly, the Court ORDER S the relator, within 3 days of the date of this order, to file a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter complai ned or else provide evidence of requesting and paying for the May 3, 2018 reporter’s record

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52. 7(a)(2), (b)

. On February 14, 2019, relator filed a “Motion for Temporary Relief” seeking to stay the underlying proceedings, pending disposition of this petition, because trial has been set for March 4, 2019, with a February 18, 2019 pretrial conference. Relator’s emergency motion contains the required certificate of compliance. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10(a). Accordingly, the Court gr ants the relator’s motion and ORDERS that the underlying trial court proceeding is stayed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10(b). This stay is effective until the petition is finally decided or this Court otherwise orders the stay lifted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52. 10(b). Any party may file a motion for reconsideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10(c). Finally, the Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus by any real party in interest. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall be filed within 20 days from the date of this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2, 52.4. It is so ORDERED

. Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

___________ x Acting individually Acting for the Court Date: __ February 15, 2019

_______
#### The STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. George T. CARPENA and George Aguilar, Defendants and Respondents.

Nos. 20830, 20831.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Feb. 4, 1986.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, Les Daroczi, Deputy County Atty., Ogden, for plaintiff and appellant.

Deirdre Gorman, Randy Richards, Ogden, for defendants and respondents.

PER CURIAM:

Defendants were arrested and charged with possession of a controlled substance *675(marijuana) with intent to distribute for value. On motion of defendants, the charges were dismissed and the State appeals. Affirmed.

A police officer patrolling a neighborhood in which a rash of burglaries had recently occurred observed at 3:00 a.m. a slowly moving automobile with Arizona plates. Defendants and another man were in the vehicle. The officer did not observe any criminal or traffic offense, and no report of a burglary had been reported to the police that night. The police officer followed the car for three blocks, then turned on his red lights. The car turned into the driveway of a residence which belonged to one of the occupants, and the three men got out of the car. After finding an unloaded pistol under the driver’s seat of the car, the officer removed the keys from the ignition and opened the trunk without the consent of any of the occupants of the automobile. Thirty pounds of marijuana were found in a garment bag in the trunk.

At a pretrial hearing, defendants moved to suppress the evidence. The district court granted the motion, ruling that the officer had no reasonable suspicion to make an investigatory stop. The State appeals from that ruling.

The State argues that the court’s ruling should be overruled by this Court and cites U.C.A., 1953, § 77-7-15 as permitting the admission of the evidence seized here. That section provides:

> A peace officer may stop any person in a public place when he has a reasonable suspicion to believe he has committed or is in the act of committing or is attempting to commit a public offense and may demand his name, address and an explanation of his actions.

Under this statute, a “brief investigatory stop of an individual by police officers is permissible when the officers ‘have a reasonable suspicion, based on objective facts, that the individual is involved in criminal activity.’ ” *State v. Swanigan,*Utah, 699 P.2d 718, 719 (1985), quoting *Brown v. Texas,*443 U.S. 47, 51, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2640, 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979).

We find that the district court did not err in determining that the officer here had no reasonable suspicion to make an investigatory stop. The stop was based merely on the fact that a car with out-of-state license plates was moving slowly through a neighborhood late at night. The officer had no objective facts on which to base a reasonable suspicion that the men were involved in criminal activity. The ruling of the district court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           36983
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           11518
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     368123
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          237436
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            230896
<LOANS>                                         984045
<ALLOWANCE>                                       8074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1712151
<DEPOSITS>                                     1120743
<SHORT-TERM>                                    334798
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              19890
<LONG-TERM>                                     125699
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1592
<OTHER-SE>                                      109429
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1712151
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  82925
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                35186
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  2802
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                120913
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               48166
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               68808
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            52105
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     1960
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 531
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  43819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  18879
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       12771
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     12771
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.53
<LOANS-NON>                                       3165
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  6078
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      360
<RECOVERIES>                                       396
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 8074
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              8074
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 3.4

            SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE BYLAWS OF INTERWEST BANCORP, INC.

Dated:         January 21, 1997

        THIS AMENDMENT to the Bylaws of InterWest Bancorp, Inc. as adopted on
December 20, 1994, was approved by unanimous vote of a quorum of the Board of
Directors of InterWest Bancorp, Inc. at a regular meeting held January 21, 1997,
at which a quorum was present and voting.

Section 3.11 is amended to read as follows:

3.11    Compensation: The directors may be paid their expenses, if any, for
        attendance at each meeting of the Board of Directors and may be paid a
        fixed sum for attendance at each meeting of the Board of Directors, a
        stated retainer as Director and/or such other compensation as may be
        fixed by the Board of Directors by Resolution. Members of special or
        standing committees may be allowed like compensation for serving on
        committees of the Board of Directors. No such payments shall preclude
        any Director from serving the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries in
        any other capacity and receiving compensation therefore.
# L_2006170EN.01001901.xml

| 23.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 170/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 170/19

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 930/2006

of 22 June 2006

determining the extent to which applications lodged in June 2006 for import licences for certain poultrymeat products under the regime provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat and certain other agricultural products can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 of 22 June 1994, laying down detailed rules for the application in the poultrymeat sector of the import arrangements provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat and certain other agricultural products (1) and in particular Article 4(4) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged for the period from 1 July to 30 September 2006 are greater than the quantities available and must therefore be reduced by a fixed percentage to ensure a fair distribution,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 July to 30 September 2006 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 shall be met as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

2.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 October to 31 December 2006 may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 for the total quantity as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 156, 23.6.1994, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1043/2001 (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 24).

1

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Percentage of acceptance of import certificates submitted for the period 1 July to 30 September 2006 | Total quantity available for the period 1 October to 31 December 2006
  (t) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 1,030927 | 1 775,001 |
| 2 | — | 5 100,000 |
| 3 | 1,076426 | 825,000 |
| 4 | 1,555209 | 450,000 |
| 5 | 3,086419 | 175,000 |
| ‘—’ | : | No application for a licence has been sent to the Commission. |

Group No

Percentage of acceptance of import certificates submitted for the period 1 July to 30 September 2006

Total quantity available for the period 1 October to 31 December 2006

(t)

1

1,030927

1 775,001

2

—

5 100,000

3

1,076426

825,000

4

1,555209

450,000

5

3,086419

175,000

‘—’

:

No application for a licence has been sent to the Commission.

---
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Coastal Gulf and International, 
Inc. as a Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Coastal Gulf and 
International, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Coastal Gulf and International, Inc., 13607 River Road, 
Luling, LA 70070, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test 
petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils 
for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 
151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to 
conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and 
receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or 
approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the 
specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries 
regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited 
or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#57343527793b36353f2617333f2479303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="57343527793b36353f2617333f2479303821">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.

http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Coastal Gulf and 
International, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on 
September 28, 2011. The next triennial inspection date will be 
scheduled for September 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Mocella, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: February 22, 2012.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-5111 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit            32.1**

**Certification**

**Pursuant            to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

|                                       |                                                                                                |                              |
|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Date: May                    15, 2007 |                                                                                           | /s/                    Bob Marbut |
|                                       | Name:  Bob                    Marbut                                                      |
|                                       | Title:                          Co-Chief Executive                      Officer |

|                                   |                                                                            |               |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
| Date: May                15, 2007 |                                                                       | /s/ Ron Chaimovski |
|                                   | Name:  Ron                Chaimovski                                  |
|                                   | Title:     Co-Chief                  Executive Officer |

----
---

Riverbank Resources Inc.

Box 12, 595 Howe St., Suite 902 Vancouver, BC, V6C 2T5

News Release

Vancouver, Canada, March 6, 2006. Riverbank Resources
Inc. (OTC BB RVBK)today wishes to announce the completion of the
phase 1 exploration program on its mineral claim, known as the Big Mike Project
property, located in the Skeena Mining Division, Stewart Area, British Columbia.
The program, which was recommended by William G. Timmins, P. Eng., on his report
dated April 25, 2005, was carried out during the month of December 2005 and
consisted of rehabilitation of main adit, establishing trenches, sampling and
prospecting area.

Samples collected during the program from the vein structure at
the adit and open cut revealed low, and trace, of mineralization. Furthermore
additional prospecting has not revealed zones of further interest.

Willim G. Timmins, who analyzed the results from the
exploration program, reports that no further exploration expenditure is
justified on the companys mineral claim.

In view of the above the company has decided to discontinue
exploration work on the Big Mike mineral project property.

The company plans to initiate investigation of new
opportunities in the mineral exploration field and any other opportunities that
may be made available in other industries.

Safe harbor for Forward-Looking Statements:

Except for statements of historical fact, the information
presented herein constitutes forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the company
to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include
general economic and business conditions, the ability to acquire and develop
specific projects, the ability to fund operations and changes in consumer and
business consumption habits and other factors over which Tao Minerals Ltd. has
little or no control.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD



|Earl
      Hope (President) | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Contact: (604)484-3701      | 

---
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 8, 2011

0228 

# Order

March 8, 2011

141942 & (37)

ERICK V. BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 141942 COA: 297413 Ingham CC: 09-000877-AA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that th e questions presented
should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 32.1**

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Safety Products Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A. Peterson, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| Dated: May 11, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ ROBERT A. PETERSON                          |
|---------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                |   |   | Robert A. Peterson                              |   |   |   |
|                |   |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |   |   |
|                |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                   |   |   |   |

 

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

----