alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006175EN.01005601.xml

| 29.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 175/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/56

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 960/2006

of 28 June 2006

determining the quantity of certain products in the milk and milk products sector available for the second half of 2006 under quotas opened by the Community on the basis of an import licence alone

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 of 14 December 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards the import arrangements for milk and milk products and opening tariff quotas (2), and in particular Article 16(2) thereof,

Whereas:

When import licences were allocated for the first half of 2006 for certain quotas referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001, applications for licences covered quantities less than those available for the products concerned. As a result, the quantity available for each quota for the period 1 July to 31 December 2006 should be fixed, taking account of the unallocated quantities resulting from Commission Regulation (EC) No 160/2006 (3) determining the extent to which the applications for import licences submitted in January 2006 for certain dairy products under certain tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 can be accepted,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities available for the period 1 July to 31 December 2006 for the second half of the year of importation of certain quotas referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 shall be as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 June 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 341, 22.12.2001, p. 29. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 926/2006 (OJ L 170, 23.6.2006, p. 8).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 25, 28.1.2006, p. 21.

3

---

ANNEX I.C

Products originating in ACP countries

| Quota number | Quantity (t) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4026 | 1 000 |
| 09.4027 | 1 000 |

Quota number

Quantity (t)

09.4026

1 000

09.4027

1 000

---

ANNEX I.D

Products originating in Turkey

| Quota number | Quantity (t) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4101 | 1 500 |

Quota number

Quantity (t)

09.4101

1 500

---

ANNEX I.Ε

Products originating from South Africa

| Quota number | Quantity (t) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4151 | 6 500 |

Quota number

Quantity (t)

09.4151

6 500

---
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Charles M. Handy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cogdell Spencer Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under the Company’s supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report the Company’s conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on the Company’s mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.       Date: August 14, 2006 By: /s/ Charles M. Handy     Name: Charles M. Handy    Title: Chief Financial Officer  
26
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis McKinnon, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Silver-man, J.), rendered October 27, 1989, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that, at the time of sentencing, the court improperly denied his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty based upon his claim of self-defense. A defendant may not withdraw his guilty plea by proffering an unsupported claim of innocence where the plea was voluntarily made with the advice of counsel following an appraisal of all relevant factors *(see, People v Tannenbaum,*116 AD2d 677). We find no improvident exercise of discretion in the denial of the defendant’s motion.

There is no merit to the defendant’s assertion that it was *864incumbent upon the court to inquire as to this affirmative defense during the plea allocution, as the defendant freely admitted that he stabbed his victim with the intent to cause him serious physical injury after acknowledging that he had knowingly and intelligently waived his constitutional rights *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9).

We further find unpersuasive the defendant’s *pro se*claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. This belated assertion is entirely conclusory and unsupported by the record. The defendant’s bare assertion to the contrary falls short of establishing a lack of meaningful representation *(see, People v Carolina,*112 AD2d 244).

The sentence imposed was bargained for and understood by the defendant at the time of his acceptance of the plea, and, under the circumstances, we find it neither harsh nor excessive. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the report of Razor Resources Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter endingJuly 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Bing Wong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Bing Wong                                    

Bing Wong, 

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: September 19, 2007
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2016195EN.01008302.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 20.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 195/83 |

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 102 of 11 April 2006](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2006_102_R_TOC)
)

On page 8, point (l) of Article 13(1):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(l) | vehicles used for milk collection from farms and the return to farms of milk containers or milk products intended for animal feed;’ |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(l) | vehicles used for milk collection from farms and/or for the return to farms of milk containers or milk products intended for animal feed;’. |

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement:

Vol. 77, No. 41, Thursday, March 1, 2012, page 12576.

# Announced Time and Date of Meeting:

Wednesday, March 7, 2012, 10 a.m.-11 a.m. Meeting Canceled.

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# Contact Person for Additional Information:

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

Dated: March 7, 2012.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-5863 Filed 3-7-12; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
Exhibit 32
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 
 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 The undersigned, Michael L. Asmussen and Ann B. Ruple, in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. (the “Registrant”) do each hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the “Report”), that, to the best of his or her knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report.
 
 
 /s/  Michael L. AsmussenMichael L. AsmussenPresident, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorMarch 24, 2010/s/  Ann B. RupleAnn B. RupleChief Financial Officer, Vice President and TreasurerMarch 24, 2010
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”), this certification accompanies the Report and shall not, except to the extent required by the Act, be deemed filed by Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2006358EN.01003001.xml

| 16.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 358/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 358/30

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1859/2006

of 15 December 2006

fixing the standard fee per farm return for the 2007 accounting year of the farm accountancy data network

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 of 13 July 1983 on certain detailed implementing rules concerning the keeping of accounts for the purpose of determining the incomes of agricultural holdings (2), and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 provides that a standard fee shall be paid by the Commission to the Member States for each duly completed farm returns forwarded to it within the period prescribed in Article 3 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 provides that a standard fee shall be paid by the Commission to the Member States for each duly completed farm returns forwarded to it within the period prescribed in Article 3 of that Regulation.

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 118/2006 (3) fixed the amount of the standard fee for the 2006 accounting year at EUR 145 per farm return. The trend in costs and its effects on the costs of completing the farm return justify a revision of the fee. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 118/2006 (3) fixed the amount of the standard fee for the 2006 accounting year at EUR 145 per farm return. The trend in costs and its effects on the costs of completing the farm return justify a revision of the fee.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Community Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Community Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard fee provided for in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 shall be fixed at EUR 148.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply for the 2007 accounting year.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ 109, 23.6.1965, p. 1859/65. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 660/2004 (OJ L 104, 8.4.2004, p. 97).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 190, 14.7.1983, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 803/2006 (OJ L 144, 31.5.2006, p. 18).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 21, 25.1.2006, p. 12.

3

---
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Johannes T. Petersen, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Century Petroleum
      Corp. for the quarter ended July 31, 2008(the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Century Petroleum Corp.                                                                

Dated: September 19, 2008

/s/ Johannes T. Petersen
Johannes T. Petersen Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) Century Petroleum
Corp.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Century
Petroleum Corp. and will be retained by Century Petroleum Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.8(b)

                       1995 DIRECTORS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
                                       OF
                          UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT


The following represents the FIRST AMENDMENT to the above-referenced Plan,
following its amendment and restatement effective July 14, 1998, made by the
Board at its January 21, 1999 meeting:

         1. Section 5(a)(ii) is amended by adding, in the first sentence
thereof, the words "and prior to January 21, 1999" immediately following the
words "Date of Initial Grant".

         2. Section 13(d) is amended by adding, in the first sentence thereof,
the words "or in lieu of" immediately following the words "in addition to" and,
in the second sentence thereof, adding the words "and may be granted on terms
and conditions other than those applicable to Grants described in Section 5"
immediately after the words "as the Board may determine". Also, in the proviso
which forms part of the second sentence of Section 13(d), the word "Board" shall
be spelled correctly.

         3. Section 13 is further amended by adding a new subsection (e) to read
as follows:"

         Pooling of Interests. With respect to any amendment to the Plan which
         becomes effective on or after January 21, 1999, if the Company, at any
         time, desires to engage in a transaction which is intended to be
         accounted for as a pooling of interests under Accounting Principal
         Board Opinion No. 16 (or any successor thereto), and if the existence
         and/or operation of any such amendment would violate Paragraph 47(c)
         thereof (or any successor thereto), then any such amendment shall (in
         whole or in part to the minimum extent necessary to avoid a violation)
         be deemed null and void ab initio and/or any operation of such
         amendment shall (in whole or in part to the minimum extent necessary to
         avoid a violation) be deemed to have no force or effect under law;
         provided, however, that



<PAGE>   2


         this subsection (e) shall apply only if the transaction is otherwise
         eligible to be accounted for as a pooling of interests.

         4. The foregoing amendments are effective January 21, 1999.

         5. Except as amended herein, all other terms and provisions shall
remain in full force and effect.
NUMBERS 13-09-00517-CR AND 13-09-00518-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

PETER CURRY, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 214th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Peter Curry, attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction for 

aggravated sexual assault of a child and a conviction of burglary of a habitation. We 

dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.

This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed 

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a 
2

timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the 

merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). 

The trial court imposed sentence in these matters on March 14, 2008, and the 

judgment was corrected by a nunc pro tunc order signed April 9, 2008. Appellant filed 

his notice of appeal on April 7, 2009. On December 22, 2009, the Clerk of this Court 

notified appellant that it appeared that the appeals were not timely perfected and that the 

appeals would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date 

of receipt of the Court=s directive. Appellant has not filed a response to the Court=s 

directive. 

Unless a motion for new trial has been timely filed, a notice of appeal must be filed 

within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after 

the day the trial court enters an appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Where a 

timely motion for new trial has been filed, the notice of appeal must be filed within ninety 

days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. See id. 26.2(a)(2). 

The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the 

deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying 

with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. 26.3.

Appellant=s notice of appeal, filed twelve months after sentence was imposed, was 

untimely, and accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeals. See Slaton, 981 

S.W.2d at 210. Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a 

post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; 
3

however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, ' 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 

S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

The appeals are DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 

21st day of December, 2010.