alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: May 11, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 90)]
[Notices]               
[Page 26316]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11my10-145]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6998]

 
In the Matter of the Designation of Qasim al-Rimi, Also Known as 
Qasim Yahya Mahda `abd al-Rimi, Also Known as Qasim al-Raymi, also 
Known as Qassim al-Raimi, also Known as Qassim al-Raymi, Also Known as 
Qassem al-Remi, Also Known as Qasim al-Rami, Also Known as Abu 
Harayrah, Also Known as Abu Hurayrah al-San'ai, Also Known as Abu 
`Ammar, as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 
1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Qasim al-Rimi and 
also known as Qasim Yahya Mahda `abd al-Rimi, also known as Qasim al-
Raymi, also known as Qassim al-Raymi, also known as Qasim al-Rami, also 
known as Abu Harayrah, also known as Abu Hurayrah al-San'ai, also known 
as Abu `Ammar committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, 
acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the 
national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 6, 2010.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-11196 Filed 5-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
#### Gertrude C. REED, Petitioner, v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Respondent.

No. 85SC53.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

May 28, 1985.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40162 Conference Calendar

WINIFORD LOCKHART, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNKNOWN LEE, Female Nurse, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-97-CV-492

-------------------- June 14, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Winiford Lockhart, Texas prisoner #589910, appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights action as frivolous. Lockhart contends that a prison nurse was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs when she gave him an overdose of a prescribed medication. Lockhart’s allegations indicate that the nurse was negligent, not that the nurse was deliberately indifferent. Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). TheNo. 00-40162 -2- dismissal of Lockhart’s action as frivolous was not an abuse of discretion. Berry v. Brady , 192 F.3d 504, 507 (5th Cir. 1999). AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caribou Coffee Company, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
George E. Mileusnic, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

May 15, 2006

                                                    /s/ George E. Mileusnic
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    George E. Mileusnic
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
# L_2006274EN.01001101.xml

| 5.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 274/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 274/11

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1470/2006

of 4 October 2006

providing for the rejection of applications for export licences in relation to certain processed products and cereal-based compound feedingstuffs

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1342/2003 of 28 July 2003 laying down special detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences for cereals and rice (2), and in particular Article 8(1) thereof,

Whereas:

The quantity covered by applications for advance fixing of refunds on potato starch and maize-based products is of great importance and could give rise to speculation. It has therefore been decided to reject all applications for export licences of such products made on 2, 3 and 4 October 2006,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In accordance with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1342/2003, applications for export licences with advance fixing of refunds for products falling within CN codes 1102 20 10, 1102 20 90, 1103 13 10, 1103 13 90, 1104 23 10, 1108 12 00, 1108 13 00, 1702 30 51, 1702 30 91, 1702 30 99, 1702 40 90 and 1702 90 50 made on 2, 3 and 4 October 2006 shall be rejected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 October 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 189, 29.7.2003, p. 12. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1263/2006 (OJ L 230, 24.8.2006, p. 6).

2

---
# L_2006335EN.01003701.xml

| 1.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 335/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 335/37

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1775/2006

of 30 November 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 24 to 30 November 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 December 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 6.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 3(iv)


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                           CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION
                                       OF
                                 PREFERRED STOCK
                                       OF
                         CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

         Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), a corporation
organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, does hereby certify as follows:

         FIRST: That in accordance with the requirements of Sections 141 and 242
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the Board of Directors
of the Company duly adopted a resolution proposing and declaring advisable that
(i) the provisions of the Company's Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the
"Stock") relating to mandatory redemption thereof set out in Section 3(a) of the
Certificate of Designation for the Stock be revoked, and (ii) such revocation be
recommended to the holders of the Stock and submitted to such holders for their
consent and approval.

         SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of
Directors of the Company, the holders of the Stock, in accordance with Sections
228 and 229 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, duly and
unanimously on December 31, 1998, consented to and approved the aforesaid
revocation of Section 3(a) of the Certificate of Designation of the Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to
Certificate of Designation of Preferred Stock to be duly executed and
acknowledged in accordance with Section 103 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware on this 10th day of February 1999.


CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


By: /s/ C. W. Grinnell
    ---------------------- 
    Charles W. Grinnell
    Vice President
# L_2006047EN.01005101.xml

| 17.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/51

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 290/2006

of 16 February 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 10 to 16 February 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 February 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 February 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 15.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xeno Transplants
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Elliot Lebowitz, Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|February 19, 2008 | /s/
      Elliot Lebowitz            
|----------------- | -------------------------------------
|                  | Elliot Lebowitz                      
|                  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                  | (Principal Executive Officer)        

---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1978 

To suspend temporarily the duty on modified steel leaf spring leaves. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Ms. CANTWELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on modified steel leaf spring 

leaves. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFIED STEEL LEAF SPRING LEAVES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new subheading: 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1978 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Single leaf spring leaves of 

alloy steel certified by the importer as of JIS grade SUP 

10H (10SAE6150), each 

measuring from approximately 137 cm to 164 cm in 

length and 10 cm to 12 cm in 

width inclusive, of a thickness 

of 76 mm to 101.6 mm inclusive, the foregoing designed 

for multi leaf and taper leaf 

construction units designed 

for use in Class 7 and 8 

trucks only, weighing 41.4 kg 

to 89.4 kg, produced using a 

patented modified aus-forming process (provided for in 

subheading 7320.10.60), assembled multi-leaf spring 

units are not included ........... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
#### Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute, Respondent, v James Katsikis Environmental Contractors, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene L. Nardelli, J.), entered November 16, 1990, which granted plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint by adding a cause of action alleging the unlicensed practice of engineering, in violation of the Education Law, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

On a motion to amend pleadings (CPLR 3025 [b]), the court should examine, but need not decide, the merits of the proposed new pleading unless it is patently insufficient on its face *(cf., Strook & Strook & Lavan v Beltramini,*157 AD2d 590; *Goldberg v Linden Towers Coop. No. 5,*147 AD2d 672). Once a prima facie basis for the amendment has been established, that should end the inquiry, even in the face of a rebuttal that might provide the ground for a subsequent motion for summary judgment (Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3025:ll).

Expert testimony brought to light during the deposition confirmed the existence of a prima facie cause of action. Defendants have failed to demonstrate prejudice attributable to any delay in making the motion. Accordingly, granting the *211motion was a proper exercise of the court’s discretion *(Murray v City of New York,*43 NY2d 400). Concur—Carro, J. P., Milonas, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                           INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We hereby consent to the use in this  Form 10-KSB/A of our reissued report
dated  June 6,  2005  on  the  financial  statements  of  REZconnect
Technologies,  Inc.,  as of December 31, 2004,  and to the reference to our firm
under the heading "Experts" in the Annual Report.

                                                  DISCHINO & ASSOCIATES, P.C.



Fairfield, New Jersey /s/ DISCHINO & ASSOCIATES, P.C., CPAs
August 1, 2005

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                               CONSENT OF COUNSEL

I hereby consent to the reference to me under the caption "Legal Matters" in the
this Amendment No. 4 to this Form 10-KSB for YTB International, Inc.




                                      /s/ CARL N. DUNCAN, ESQ.
Bethesda, Maryland
August 1, 2005
<PAGE>


                                                                          3 (vi)


                         SECOND CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                           CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION
                                       OF
                                 PREFERRED STOCK
                                       OF
                         CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

     Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), a corporation organized
and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does
hereby certify as follows:

     FIRST: That in accordance with the requirements of Sections 141 and 242 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the Board of Directors of
the Company duly adopted a resolution proposing and declaring advisable that (i)
the second sentence of Section 1(a) of the Certificate of Designation, as
amended (the "Certificate"), for the Company's Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock (the "Stock") be amended to provide as follows: "The number of shares of
this Series shall be 15,000 registered shares, par value $0.05 per share" and
(ii) such amendment be recommended to the holders of the Stock and be submitted
to such holders for their consent and approval.

     SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors
of the Company, the holders of the Stock, in accordance with Sections 228 and
229 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, on August 20, 1999
duly consented to and approved the aforesaid amendment of the Certificate.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to
Certificate of Designation of Preferred Stock to be duly executed and
acknowledged in accordance with Section 103 of the General Corporation Law of
the Sate of Delaware on this 23rd day of August 1999.


                         CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                           By: /s/ Charles W. Grinnell
                               -------------------------------
                               Director, Vice President, and
                               Corporate Secretary


                                       33