alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of Harry & David Holdings, Inc.s (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 26, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods presented in the Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                                          
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 5, 2009 |  |  |  |    
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    WILLIAM H.
WILLIAMS                               
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | William H. Williams President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    EDWARD F.
DUNLAP                                  
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Edward F. Dunlap Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 13.1



906 CERTIFICATION



April 11, 2011



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Telecom Italia S.p.A. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2010 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code.



Franco Bernabè, the Chief
Executive Officer, and Andrea Mangoni, the Chief Financial Officer, of Telecom Italia S.p.A., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Telecom Italia S.p.A.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    FRANCO
BERNABÈName:

Franco BernabèTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


By:

/s/     ANDREA
MANGONIName:

Andrea MangoniTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
# L_2006343EN.01008001.xml

| 8.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 343/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 343/80

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1812/2006

of 7 December 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 1 to 7 December 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 8 December 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
#### The STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Dorian WADDOUPS, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 20076.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Dec. 9, 1985.

David L. Wilkinson, Paul M. Warner, Robert N. Parrish, Sandra L. Sjogren, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.

Jack H. Molgard, Brigham City, for defendant and respondent.

DURHAM, Justice:

This is an appeal from an order of dismissal of a criminal case. The State claims error in a pretrial ruling declaring a witness incompetent to testify and suppressing the witness’s out-of-court statements. No error in the dismissal itself is claimed, since it was granted at the State’s request after the entry of the pretrial order. The *224threshold question for our determination is whether the State may pursue an appeal of right under these circumstances.

The circumstances under which the State may appeal adverse rulings in the trial court in criminal cases have traditionally been limited by constitutional and statutory provisions. *See, e.g., State v. Kelbach,*Utah, 569 P.2d 1100 (1977) (State has no right to appeal except as expressly provided by statute). The Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure have codified that restrictive approach in U.C.A., 1953, § 77-35-26, which delineates a narrow category of cases in which the prosecution may take an appeal. An appeal from an order granting a pretrial motion to suppress is not permitted as a matter of right, but only “when, upon a petition for review, the supreme court decides that such an appeal would be in the interest of justice.” U.C.A., 1953, § 77-35-26(c)(5). The State has attempted to circumvent this Court’s discretion to grant or deny petitions for review pursuant to this section by requesting a dismissal and relying on paragraph (1) of Rule 26(c), which permits an appeal of right by the prosecution “[f]rom a final judgment of dismissal.”

It is clear from the briefs and oral argument in this case that the State wishes to have this Court review, not the trial court’s order of dismissal, but the earlier order of suppression. To allow an appeal of right in such a circumstance would give the State an appeal of right from virtually every adverse pretrial order. That result would be inconsistent with our law and would be a distortion of the language and intent of the statute. Therefore, we hold that this appeal has not been properly filed, and we order it dismissed.

HALL, C.J., and STEWART, HOWE and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Anthony K. Welch, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boveran Diagnostics, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue  statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such

disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

























---

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 20, 2009                   /s/ Anthony K. Welch

----------------------

Anthony K. Welch

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

________________ _____________
No. 1D19-0351

________________ _____________
N ORMAN D. R EYNOLDS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

________________ _____________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Ham ilton County. Andrew J. Decker, III, Judge.

March 18, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. Because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, this case is hereby dismissed for la ck of jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b) ; Peltz v. District Cour t of Appeal, Third Dist. , 605 So. 2d 865, 866 (Fla. 1992).

W ETHERELL , O STERHAUS , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur.2 ________________ _____________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fl a. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

________________ _____________

Norman D. Reynolds, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney Gene ral, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 24, 2014

s0616 

# Order

Clerk June 24, 2014

148689

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148689

COA: 310704

Wayne CC: 11

- 007861

- FC

JOHN EDWARD JONES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2013

ju dgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
HeinOnline -- 45 Fed. Reg. 33068 1980
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 17 (Friday, January 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 5555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01551]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8161]

Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Piero della Francesca in America''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``Piero della Francesca in America'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at The Frick 
Collection, New York, NY, from on or about February 12, 2013, until on 
or about May 19, 2013, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including the 
art object list, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the 
Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6467). The 
mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor 
(Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 17, 2013.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-01551 Filed 1-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Solely
      in
      connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Mosaic Nutraceuticals
      Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as
      filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Charles Townsend, Chief Executive Officer
      and Principal Financial Officer, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.





August
      16, 2006





/s/ 
      Charles
      Townsend CHARLES
      TOWNSEND PRESIDENT,
      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AND PRINCIPAL
      FINANCIAL OFFICER
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1859 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1859

   To reinstate Federal matching of State spending of child support 
                          incentive payments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 22, 2009

  Mr. Rockefeller (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Kohl, and Ms. Snowe) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To reinstate Federal matching of State spending of child support 
                          incentive payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Support Protection Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF FEDERAL MATCHING OF STATE SPENDING OF CHILD 
              SUPPORT INCENTIVE PAYMENTS.

    Effective October 1, 2010, section 455(a)(1) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 655(a)(1)) is amended by striking ``from amounts paid to 
the State under section 458 or''.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOEL GARCIA,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00274-CR

Appeal from the

210th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20150D000100)

O R D E R

On October 30, 2019, T. Brent Mayr was withdrawn as counsel of record for the Appellant. 

However, it appears that the trial court has not yet appointed new counsel. Therefore, the trial 

court is ordered to appoint counsel to represent Appellant on appeal. The order of appointment 

shall be filed with the trial court no later than December 16, 2019. Further, the order of 

appointment shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record and forwarded to this Court no later 

than December 26, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 26

th day of November, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5836]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Public Availability of the National Endowment for the Humanities 
FY 2011 Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of public availability of FY 2011 service contract 
inventory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), the National 
Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) is publishing this notice to advise 
the public of the availability of the FY 2011 Service Contract 
Inventory. This inventory provides information on service contract 
actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2011. The information is 
organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed 
throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance 
with guidance issued on November 5, 2010 and December 19, 2011 by the 
Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy 
(OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/procurement-service-contract-inventories. NEH has posted its inventory 
and a summary of the inventory on the NEH homepage at the following 
link: http://www.neh.gov/whoweare/administrative.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Maynes, Director, Administrative 
Services Office at 202-606-8233 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d4f404c5443485e6d434845034a425b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ea88878b93848f99aa848f82c48d859c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 6, 2012.
Michael P. McDonald,
General Counsel and Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-5836 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| (1)   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Farrier Resources Corp. for the                quarter                ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a)                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of Farrier Resources                Corp.. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: | /s/                Kent Kirby                                                                            |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Kent                Kirby                                                                          |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  August                2, 2006                                                                      |