alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0299. CHARLES GRIFFIN, JR. v. THE STATE.

On October 5, 2020, the trial court issued orders denying three motions filed

byCharles Griffin, Jr.: a “pro se extraordinary motion for new trial,” a “pro se motion

for clerk of court case file, court records & transcripts,” and a “pro se motion for

‘cause’ hearing (nunc pro tunc) orders of production and appearance.” On March 11,

2021, Griffin filed this application for discretionary review.1 We lack jurisdiction

because the application is untimely.

To be timely, an application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order

or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). As Griffin filed this application

157 days after entry of the orders at issue, the application is untimely and subject to

dismissal. See Crosson v. Conway, 291 Ga. 220, 220 (1) (728 SE2d 617) (2012); see

also Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989) (“The requirements

of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and this [C]ourt cannot accept an appeal not

made in compliance therewith.”).

In his application, Griffin seeks permission to file an out-of-time application.

However, he is not entitled to such relief because he filed his application well beyond

the application due date. See In the Interest of B. R. F., 338 Ga. App. 762, 762 (791

SE2d 859) (2016) (“While this [C]ourt is authorized to grant an extension of time for

the filing of an application for discretionary appeal, requests for extensions must be

filed on or before the due date of the discretionary application. Otherwise, we lack the

authority to grant the request.”) (citation and punctuation omitted); Court of Appeals

1 Griffin filed his application in the Supreme Court, which transferred it here.

May 04, 2021
Rule 31 (i) (“No extensions of time will be granted to file a discretionary application

unless a motion for extension of time is filed on or before the application due date.”).

Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/04/2021
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5980]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee will be held on April 11-
12, 2012, in Room 530 at the Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 
Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC. On April 11, the session will begin 
at 8:30 a.m. and end at 5 p.m. On April 12, the session will begin at 8 
a.m. and end at 12 noon. This meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary 
of Veterans Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on all matters 
pertaining to geriatrics and gerontology. The Committee assesses the 
capability of VA health care facilities and programs to meet the 
medical, psychological, and social needs of older Veterans and 
evaluates VA programs designated as Geriatric Research, Education, and 
Clinical Centers.
    The meeting will feature presentations and discussions on VA's 
geriatrics and extended care programs, aging research activities, 
updates on VA's employee staff working in the area of geriatrics (to 
include training, recruitment and retention approaches), Veterans 
Health Administration (VHA) strategic planning activities in geriatrics 
and extended care, recent VHA efforts regarding dementia and program 
advances in palliative care, and performance and oversight of VA 
Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers.
    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. Interested parties should provide 
written comments for review by the Committee to Mrs. Marcia Holt-
Delaney, Program Analyst, Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care 
(10P4G), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20420, or via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e735f4c5d575f107651524a137a5b525f505b477e485f10595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="35785447565c541b7d5a594118715059545b504c7543541b525a43">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Individuals who wish to attend the meeting should contact Mrs. Holt-
Delaney at (202) 461-6769.

    Dated: March 7, 2012.
    By Direction of the Secretary.
Vivian Drake,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-5980 Filed 3-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Resource Capital Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jonathan Z. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 May
      8, 2009
              /s/
      Jonathan Z. CohenJonathan
      Z. CohenChief
      Executive Officer
STATE OF ALASKA

) ) ss. FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

) AFFIDAVIT OF CANCELLATION
OF ORAL HEARING I, Rebecca Tyson Smith, Environmental Program Specialist of The Department of Environmental Conservation, being sworn,state the following: The Department ofEnvironmental Conservation tentatively scheduled anoral hearing, available upon request asstated in the notice of proposed regulations, for June 24,2015, at 1200- 1330, in Conference Room A, Department ofEnvironmental Conservation Building, 619 E. Ship Creek, Ste. 249, Anchorage, AK 99501. No member of the public requested anoral hearing, and the public hearing wascancelled and noticed asstated in the notice of proposed regulations. DATE:**~**6i2J5" Juneau, **~**ska SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before methis 2atl. day of**~**

,Qo 15
. t4 {:F{l/1. [NOTARY SEAL] Notary Public in and for th e State of AlaskatJ/1 My commission expires: WLfh c.e_ STATE OF **ALASKAc:·~~,;** OFF

I C IAL SEAL **.~-:** Cla

i r e Fishwick
''_:
·• NO TARY PUBL.IC My Comml ss l.o nE x p ires With Offic e
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J OS E L UI S ME DI NA AL VA R AD O, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 16337 D . C. N o s . 3 : 0 8 - c v - 0 4 5 5 7 - CRB

3 : 0 1 - c r - 0 0 4 1 9 - CRB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C ha r l e s R . B r e y e r , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 5, 2011 ** B e f o r e : B . F L E T C H E R , C L I F T O N , a n dB E A , C ir c u it J u d g e s . F eder al pri soner J ose L ui s M edi na A l vara do appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s or de rde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2255 habe a s m ot i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n d w e a f f i rm. A lv a r a d o c o n te n d s th a t h is tr ia l c o u n s e l w a s in e f f e c tiv e f o rf a ilin g a c c u r a te ly 

# FI LED APR11 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 16337 2 t o adv i se hi m of hi s pot ent i al se nt ence i f he w as t o p l ea d g ui l ty. A s the di stri ct courtno t ed, no pl eaoffe r w as ext ended t o A l vara do , and the se nt ence he re ce i ved w as cl ose t o, i f noti dent i ca l t o, the G ui del i nes s ent ence thatw ou l d h ave r es ul t ed fr om a pl ea . A cc ordi ng l y, A l vara do cann otdem on stra t e pre j ud i ce because he has f a i l e d t o s how tha tthe r e w a s ar e a s onabl e pr obabi l i tytha tthe r e s ul tof the p r o c e e d in g w o u ldh a v e b e e n d if f e r e n t. Se e Str i c kland v . W as hi ngton , 4 6 6 U . S. 6 6 8 , 6 9 3 - 9 4 ( 1 9 8 4 ) ; se e al so U ni ted States v. B laylock , 2 0 F .3 d1 4 5 8 , 1 4 6 6 - 6 7 ( 9 th C i r. 19 94 ). T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on by concl ud i ng thatan e v id e n tia ryh e a r in g w a s n o t n e c e s s a ryto r e s o lv e th is c la im . See Fraze r v . U ni ted States , 1 8 F .3 d 7 7 8 , 7 8 1 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 4 ) . W e c ons true A l va r a do’ s a ddi t i ona l a r gum e nt s a s am ot i on t o e xpa nd the c e rt i f i c a t e o f ap p e a l ab i l i ty . So c o n s tru e d , th e mo t i o n i s d e n i e d . Se e 9 th Ci r . R. 2 2 - 1 ( e ) ; s e e al

s o Hi i v ala v . W

ood , 19 5 F . 3d 10 98 , 11 04 -05 (9th C i r. 19 99 ) ( per curi am ). A FFI R M ED .
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2006 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain acrylic synthetic staple fiber. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain acrylic synthetic 

staple fiber. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC SYNTHETIC STAPLE FIBER 

4 WITH AN AVERAGE FILAMENT DECITEX OF 4.0 

5 TO 5.6. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2006 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic fiber tow 

(polyacrylontrile tow) containing by weight a minimum 

of 92% polyacrylonitrile, not 

more than .01 percent zinc 

and from 2 to 8 percent 

water, imported in the form 

of 8 sub-bundles, crimped together, each containing 

24,000 filaments (plus or 

minus 10 percent) and with 

an average filament decitex 

of 4.0 to 5.6 decitex (plus or 

minus 10 percent), and 

length greater than 2 meters 

(provided for in subheading 

5501.30.00) ........................... 1.2% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7767

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HENRY P. BENNETT, JR., a/k/a Juni, a/k/a Unc,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:07-cr-00924-DCN-1)

Submitted: October 8, 2021 Decided: January 11, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeremy A. Thompson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL 

PUBLIC DEFENDER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. M. Rhett DeHart, Acting 

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, Andrew R. de Holl, Assistant United 

States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Henry P. Bennett, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals from the district court’s order 

denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as 

amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 

5239. We review a district court’s order denying a compassionate release motion for abuse 

of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have 

reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion. The district court denied Bennett’s

motion after assessing the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and sufficiently explained 

its reasons for the denial. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) 

(discussing amount of explanation required for denial of compassionate release motion). 

We therefore affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kelly Fielder, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Razor Resources Inc.
      for the period ended January 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Razor Resources Inc.                                                                   

Dated: July 24, 2009



| | /s/
      Kelly Fielder                                        
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | Kelly Fielder                                                  
| | President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director                   
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer
| | and Principal Accounting Officer)                              
| | Razor Resources Inc.                                           

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Razor
Resources Inc. and will be retained by Razor Resources Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5722]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-12-005]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY: Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

DATES: Time and Date: March 14, 2012 at 11 a.m.
    Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered

    1. Agendas for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Vote in Inv. No. 731-TA-1089 (Review)(Certain Orange Juice from 
Brazil). The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its 
determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce 
on or before March 27, 2012.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

     Issued: March 5, 2012.

    By order of the Commission.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-5722 Filed 3-6-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jesus Romero, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), rendered October 17, 1989, by which defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, one count of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and one count of loitering in the first degree and sentencing to concurrent terms of two terms of to 9 years, one term of 5 to 10 years, and time served, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The defendant was arrested as a result of the activity of the members of the Street Narcotics Enforcement Unit on April 17, 1989 in the vicinity of 183rd Street and Walton Avenue in the Bronx. Police officers in a rooftop observation post, using high powered binoculars, observed the defendant selling narcotics to various individuals. Two of the buyers were apprehended, and a quantity of heroin was recovered from the buyers and from the windshield area of the car on which the defendant at times sat while transacting the sales.

The only argument raised by the defendant on appeal is that the prosecutor on summation repeatedly vouched for the testimony of the police witnesses, misstated the applicable law, and mischaracterized the defense by arguing that it was defendant’s contention that he was framed. Review of the prosecutor’s summation shows that while the prosecutor made certain improper statements, the court sustained the defense counsel’s objections and gave prompt and accurate curative instructions after each sustained objection. Moreover, on the whole the summation, when viewed in the light of the defense summation, does not warrant reversal, and was proper comment in view of the fact that defendant’s counsel on a number of occasions inferred that the police were “framing” the defendant. *(See, People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396, 398.) Concur —Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ross and Rubin, JJ.
# L_2007327EN.01003201.xml

| 13.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 327/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 327/32

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1875/2006 of 18 December 2006 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 360 of 19 December 2006
  )

On page 99, point 15, first paragraph, second sentence:

for:

‘The relevant customs procedure shall be entered in the form of the codes used in the second or third subdivision of Box 1 of the single administrative document.’,

read:

‘The relevant customs procedure shall be entered in the form of the letters used as column headings (A to K) to identify customs procedures in the matrix in Annex 37, Title I, point B.’

---
**Exhibit 32** **Residential    Capital, LLC** **Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal    Financial Officer****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Residential Capital,    LLC (the Company) on    Form 10-Q    for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company,    certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant    to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best    of their knowledge:     1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company. /s/  James    G. Jones    James G. Jones    Chief Executive Officer    May 7, 2008 /s/  James    N. Young    James N. Young    Chief Financial Officer    May 7, 2008 *A signed original of this written statement required by    Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or    otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form    within the electronic version of this written statement required    by Section 906, has been provided to Residential Capital, LLC    and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission    or its staff upon request.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BIRNER
DENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,169,687
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,993,681
<ALLOWANCES>                                   296,911
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,648,413
<PP&E>                                       7,110,871
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,497,850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,543,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,339,861
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    18,531,738
<OTHER-SE>                                     213,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,543,359
<SALES>                                     29,189,754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,189,754
<CGS>                                       24,735,744
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,735,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,181,890
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             429,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                843,120
<INCOME-TAX>                                   128,471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            714,649
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                       39,162
<NET-INCOME>                                   675,487
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>