alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1







SHAMIKA 2 GOLD,INC.
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Shamika 2 Gold, Inc.. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Vivian, President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: May 17, 2011
/s/ Robert VivianName:  Robert VivianTitle:  President and Chief Executive Officer and Interim Financial Officer(Principal Executive and  Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 31.2





Certification Under Section 302

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Scott M. Cattanach, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PSB Holdings, Inc. (the registrant);



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 14, 2007

SCOTT M. CATTANACH

Scott M. Cattanach

Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### In the Matter of Leslie G. QUINTON, a Minor v. Thelma QUINTON, Appellant.

No. 18412.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Jan. 11, 1984.

William H. Henderson, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

John C. Backlund, Andrea Alcables, Salt Lake City, for respondent.

HOWE, Justice:

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for adoption filed by Thelma Quinton, appellant, seeking to adopt her stepson, Leslie G. Quinton, minor son of her late husband, Myron Quinton.

Myron Quinton and Kaye Quinton were divorced in 1972. She was granted custody of their unborn child, Leslie. In 1978 she pleaded guilty to attempted forcible sexual abuse of the child, a class A misdemeanor. Thereupon, Myron Quinton sought and obtained an order of a juvenile court of this state awarding him custody of Leslie. Prom that time until December of 1980 when Myron died, Leslie lived with his father and the appellant, whom Myron had married. After Myron’s death the appellant petitioned to adopt Leslie, but the trial court denied the petition on the ground that Leslie’s natural mother, Kaye, had not given her consent to the proposed adoption and that she had neither been judicially deprived of his custody on account of cruelty, neglect or desertion nor had she abandoned him rendering her consent unnecessary under U.C.A., 1953, § 78-30-4 and § 78-30-5. .

The appellant assails the trial court’s finding that Leslie’s natural mother had not abandoned him. We have reviewed the evidence, and we find that it supports the trial court’s finding. Kaye gave gifts to Leslie on his birthday and Christmas. She wrote him letters, visited him and talked to him on the telephone. In addition, she initiated legal action to regain his custody. While there was no evidence that she supported him, no evidence was presented to establish a duty of support on her part or that she had the financial ability to provide any support. *Robertson v. Hutchinson,*Utah, 560 P.2d 1110 (1977).

Appellant further complains that the trial court excluded evidence that the best interest of Leslie would be served by her adoption of him. We find no error in this regard. Until the necessary consents have been given or it has been determined that they are not required under §§ 78-30-4 or 78-30-5, the best interest of the child is not material in an adoption proceed*23ing. *In re Adoption of Maestas,*Utah, 531 P.2d 492 (1975).

The denial of the petition is affirmed. Costs awarded to respondent.

HALL, C.J., and OAKS and STEWART, JJ., concur.

DURHAM, Justice

(concurring specially):

I write separately to emphasize that this is not an action for custody, but rather an adoption proceeding governed by the specific provisions of U.C.A., 1953, §§ 78-30-4 and 78-30-5, as pointed out in the majority opinion. Nothing herein precludes any party concerned with the long-term welfare of this child from seeking an adjudication of the natural mother’s legal rights pursuant to the statutory provisions regarding termination of parental rights by the juvenile court. *See*U.C.A., 1953, § 78-3a-48; *In re J.P.,*Utah, 648 P.2d 1364 (1982).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2135 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2135

  To suspend temporarily the duty on Cellulose, sodium carboxymethyl.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Alexander (for himself and Mr. Corker) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on Cellulose, sodium carboxymethyl.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CELLULOSE, SODIUM CARBOXYMETHYL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Sodium              Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        carboxymethylcell                                                  31/2011.......
                        ulose (CAS No.
                        9004-32-4)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3912.31.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Joseph F. Santoro, Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 21, 1990, which assessed Joseph F. Santoro for unemployment insurance contributions.

Substantial evidence in the record supports the determination that the distributors engaged by Joseph F. Santoro, a wholesaler of snack food, were his employees and not independent contractors. Although the distributors signed independent contractor agreements, those same agreements vested Santoro with substantial control over their activities *(see, Matter of Pepsi Cola Buffalo Bottling Corp. [Hartnett],*144 AD2d 220, 222). For example, Santoro set the terms and prices at which the distributors buy the product, the distributors were limited to a designated area and any replacements were subject to Santoro’s approval *(see, Matter of Oakes [Stroehman Bakeries—Roberts],*137 AD2d 927). In addition, in the case of unsatisfactory service to a particular outlet, after giving 10 days’ notice Santoro could deem those outlets abandoned and make other arrangements to serve them if the problem per*1043sisted. While other factors may support Santoro’s contention that the distributors were independent contractors, affirmance is required as the determination is supported by substantial evidence *(see, Matter of CDK Delivery Serv. [Hartnett],*151 AD2d 932, 933).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 LEGACY BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Rule 13a  14(a) / 15d-14(a)
 I, J. Williar Dunlaevy, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Legacy Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:
May 12, 2006
    
    /s/ J. Williar DunlaevyJ. Williar DunlaevyChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
 22
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2126

NEGUSSIE SADO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LELAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

RONALD MARX; EDMUND PETERS; TED LEWIS; CHRISTOPHER PICKWICK; LINDA HERFORD; WASHINGTON

ADVENTIST HOSPITAL,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA94-2959-PJM)

Submitted: October 29, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Negussie Sado, Appellant Pro Se. R. Dennis Osterman, LERCH, EARLY

& BREWER, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appellee's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant's suit

filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as

amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (1994). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sado

v. Marx, No. CA-94-2959-PJM (D. Md. July 26, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40842

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE HUMBERTO AVALOS-GUTIERREZ, also known as Jose GarzaRamirez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-169-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Humberto AvalosGutierrez raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. MartinezLugo, 782 F.3d 198, 204-05 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 533 (2015). In 

Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d at 204-05, we held that an enhancement under 

U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) for a prior felony conviction of a drug trafficking 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 17, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40842 Document: 00513383787 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
No. 15-40842

2

offense is warranted regardless whether the conviction for the prior offense 

required proof of remuneration or commercial activity. Accordingly, the 

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an 

extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district 

court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-40842 Document: 00513383787 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
Exhibit
      32.5




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Frezer, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in
      the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      September 14, 2006




By:
            /s/
              David KoosDavid
              KoosChief
              Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
      adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
      of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Frezer,
      Inc. and will be retained by Frezer, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Air Force Art Collection





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2021

    Focus on Priorities

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    CSAF Leadership Library    
        CSAF Leadership Library Bookshelf

    2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers





    Contact Us  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (0.58 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR ActOSI Tip Line
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the report of Razor Resources Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending October 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Rong XIn Yang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Rong Xin Yang                                    

Rong Xin Yang, 

Chief Financial Officer

Dated: January 4, 2006