alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5692]



[[Page 14027]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Topics in Development, 
Signaling, and Disease.
    Date: April 3, 2012.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Cathy J. Wedeen, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, OD, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 
Executive Blvd., Room 5B01-G, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6878, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0770626362626964476a666e6b29696e6f29606871"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cfb8aaabaaaaa1ac8fa2aea6a3e1a1a6a7e1a8a0b9">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: March 2, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-5692 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     The undersigned hereby certify that pursuant to the provisionsof 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), the Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2004 (the“Form 10-K”) of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc., aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and thatinformation contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company at and for the periods indicated. By:     /s/ David J. Barrett           Name: David J. Barrett Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer By:     /s/ Harry T. Hawks           Name: Harry T. Hawks Title:    Executive Vice President and Chief
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.1.1

Amendment to the Limited Liability Company Agreement of Iridium LLC as approved
by the members of Iridium LLC on November 25, 1998

Section 4.02 of the LLC Agreement shall apply to the $800 million Secured Bank
Facility in the same manner in which it has applied to the $1 billion Interim
Secured Bank Facility and any other references to the Credit Agreement and
related Loans and other documents shall refer to the documents entered into in
connection with the $800 million Secured Bank Facility.

Section 4.02 shall be amended by adding a new Section 4.02(e) as follows:

        "(e) Notwithstanding anything in this Section 4.02 to the contrary, if
an RCC Demand is made at any time when (i) the Loans and all other amounts
owing under the Credit Agreement have been paid in full, and the Commitments
have expired or terminated and (ii) the Motorola Exposure (as such term is
defined in the Agreement Regarding Guarantee among LLC, Iridium Operating LLC
and Motorola in effect from time to time) exceeds $275 million, then Motorola
shall be deemed to have met its Reserve Capital Call obligation."
#### STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Floyd HUMPHERYS, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 20539.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Sept. 19, 1985.

Clint S. Judkins, Tremonton, for defendant and appellant.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of theft by deception, a third degree felony in violation of U.C.A., 1953, § 76-6-405 (1978 ed.), and issuing bad checks, a third degree felony in violation of U.C.A., 1953, § 76-6-505(1) (1978 ed.) (Supp.1983). He claims that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a continuance of trial. We affirm.

On August 22, 1984, defendant’s trial was set for January 8 and 9, 1985. Defendant was originally represented by court-appointed counsel, who was withdrawn by the court when defendant obtained employment. On December 18, 1984, defendant was again given court-appointed counsel, who filed a motion for a continuance the following day. The motion was argued on the first morning of the trial. Defendant’s counsel indicated that he wanted to speak to the State’s two material witnesses who had been very reluctant to talk with him. He also mentioned that there might be a third witness who might volunteer some helpful information on defendant’s case and mitigate defendant’s liability. The court noted that the third witness’s statement, if any, would refer to a case that had nothing to do with the charges before the court, and that the other two witnesses were present to testify at the trial. Its denial of the motion was based on those factors and the fact that defendant had notice of his trial well in advance.

It is well established in Utah, as elsewhere, that the granting of a continuance is at the discretion of the trial judge, whose decision will not be reversed by this Court absent an abuse of discretion. *State v. Creviston,*Utah, 646 P.2d 750 (1982); *State v. Moosman,*Utah, 542 P.2d 1093*110(1975). Continuances are traditionally granted to allow the defendant additional time for procuring an absent witness. The defendant must show that the testimony he seeks is material and admissible, that he will produce the witness within a reasonable time, and that he has exercised due diligence before the request for a continuance. *State v. Creviston, supra.*

Defendant’s counsel had three weeks to prepare for trial. Two of the witnesses defendant claimed were important to his case were actually present at trial and thus subject to cross-examination. The third, as noted by the court, did not link the defendant to any charges before the court, so that the need for his presence was speculative at best. Given those facts, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion.

We affirm the trial court’s ruling on the motion for a continuance.

STEWART, J., concurs in the result.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5685]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Notice of Availability of Funds and Solicitation for Grant 
Applications for Senior Community Service Employment Program National 
Grants for Program Year 2012

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA). Funding Opportunity 
Number: SGA/DFA PY-11-04.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Employment and Training Administration (ETA), U.S. 
Department of Labor announces a grant competition for national grantees 
funded under the Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP) 
authorized under title V of the Older Americans Act (OAA) as amended in 
2006, Public Law 109-365. Approximately $346,000,000 in grant funds 
will be available for national grantees.
    SCSEP grant funds are awarded to states and territories, and to 
competitively-chosen national grantees. This funding opportunity is for 
national grantees. SCSEP is the only Federally-sponsored employment and 
training program targeted specifically to unemployed low-income older 
individuals who want to enter or re-enter the workforce. Program 
participants receive work experience at local public or non-profit 
agencies and are paid the higher of the Federal, State, or local 
minimum wage, or the prevailing wage for similar employment, for 
approximately 20 hours per week while in community service and other 
job training (OAA Amendments Sec.  502(b)(1)(J); 20 CFR 641.565(a)). 
The dual goals of the program are to promote useful opportunities in 
community service job training and to move SCSEP participants into 
unsubsidized employment, where appropriate.
    The complete SGA and any subsequent SGA amendments, in connection 
with this solicitation are described in further detail on ETA's Web 
site at http://www.doleta.gov/grants/ or on http://www.grants.gov. The 
Web sites provide application information, eligibility requirements, 
review and selection procedures and other program requirements 
governing this solicitation.

DATES: The closing date for receipt of applications is May 10, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeannette Flowers, 200 Constitution 
Avenue NW., Room N-4716, Washington, DC 20210; Telephone: 202-693-3322.

    Signed March 5, 2012 in Washington, DC by.
B. Jai Johnson,
Grant Officer, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-5685 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
WLtoys V303 Auto Pathfinder FPV Drone with GPS + Camera Mount

First Person View (FPV) Display while flying included With 6-axis system left and right crab flying / hanged flying / 360 Degree rotating / light GPS auto pilot function Come home button ready Low voltage protection (two levels) Failsafe and self-landing CF headless mode PTZ gyro-stabilized Built-in Gyro: Yes Remote Control: 2.4GHz Wireless Remote Control, Built-in LCD Display Channel: 4-Channels Mode: Mode 2 (Left Hand Throttle) Size:30.530.518.5cm Diagonal Wheelbase:37.6cm Flight time:13-15 Minutes Maxium Flight weight 975g including camera

1. Zerotech GPS Hold system 2. Altitude hold system 3. CF headless mode 4. 1 touch gohome 5. Failsafe to return home & Landing 6. Low voltage protection 7. Control distance: 500 metres 8. Charging time: 1.5 - 2 hours 9. Flying time: 13 - 15 minutes 10. Battery: 11.1V 2700mAh 25C
# L_2006084EN.01000301.xml

| 23.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 84/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 84/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 470/2006

of 22 March 2006

amending Regulation (EC) No 1063/2005 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the export of common wheat held by the Czech intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1063/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the export of 275 911 tonnes of common wheat held by the Czech intervention agency. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1063/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the export of 275 911 tonnes of common wheat held by the Czech intervention agency.

| (2) | The Czech Republic has informed the Commission of its intervention agency’s intention to increase by 120 000 tonnes the quantity put out to tender for export. In view of the quantities available and the market situation, the request made by the Czech Republic should be granted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Czech Republic has informed the Commission of its intervention agency’s intention to increase by 120 000 tonnes the quantity put out to tender for export. In view of the quantities available and the market situation, the request made by the Czech Republic should be granted.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 1063/2005 should therefore be amended. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 1063/2005 should therefore be amended.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1063/2005 is amended as follows:

‘Article 2

The invitation to tender shall cover a maximum of 395 911 tonnes of common wheat for export to third countries with the exception of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Liechtenstein, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro (*1) and Switzerland.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 March 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 36. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1535/2005 (OJ L 247, 23.9.2005, p. 3).

2

---
### ]~ 

# South Coast

~ Air Quality Management District
:: 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 AQ~ (909) 396-2000 http://www.aqmd.gov Office ofthe Executive Officer BarryR. Wallerstein, D.Env. 909.396.2100, fax 909.396.3340 March31, 1999 Mr. Robert Fletcher Chief, Emissions Assessment Branch 

### RECEiVED Stationary Source Division Air Resources Board 

## APR 121999 P.O. Box2815 RULE EVALUATION SECTION Sacramento, CA 95812 AIR RESOURCES BOARD Dear Mr. Fletcher: SIP Submittal

Rule 2202

—On-Road MotorVehicle Mitigation Options
Attached you will find information pertainingto Amended Rule 2202

—On-Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options which was adopted bythe South CoastAir Quality Management District (AQMD) Governing Board on October9, 1998. This State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal is intended to replace prior amendments to Rule 2202, adopted bythe AQMD Governing Board on November 8, 1996. The substantive amendmentto Rule 2202 was the increased compliance threshold from 100 employees to 250 employees perworksite, effectiveJune 19, 1998. The threshold was revised upwards in orderto complywith Health and Safety Codes 40458 and 44243.5 (Senate Bill 432

— Lewis). Amended Rule 2202 continues to provide members ofthe regulated communitywith a menu offlexible and cost-effective emission reduction strategies from which they can chooseto implement and meetthe emission reduction target fortheirsites. Compliance strategies made available to employers include old-vehicle scrapping, the use ofcredits from clean on-road vehicles and off-road equipment, emission reduction credits from stationary sources, and creditthrough the Air Quality Investment Program (AQIP).We are requesting that, upon your review and compliance, the attached information be

provided to EPA for its review and inclusion in the SIP. Ifyou have any questions on this submittal, please contact Kathryn Higgins, Program Supervisor, at (909) 396-3309.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Executive Officer
LCV:KH Attachments: SIP Completeness Checklist SIP Approvability Checklist

— Enforceability Clean Copy ofAmended Rule 2202 Underline and Strikeout Copy ofthe rule Referenced Rules ProofofPublication Board Resolution Public Comments and Responses APCD/AQMI) Rule Evaluation Form Board Letter/StaffReport
cc: Dan Meer/EPA Region IX (w/o attachments) Barbara BairdJSCAQMI) (w/o attachments) Lupe Valdez/SCAQMD (w/o attachments) Jack BroadbentJSCAQMD (w/o attachments) Elaine Chang/SCAQMD (w/o attachments) Henry Hogo/SCAQMD (w/o attachments) Ed PupkaJSCAQMD (w/o attachments) Kathryn Higgins/SCAQMD (w/o attachments) Rule 2202 Administrative File (w/attachments) Sincerely,
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Hale, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fred Eggert, J.), rendered November 1, 1988, convicting defendant after jury trial of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him as a second violent felony offender to 6 to 12 years imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

This Court rejects defendant’s argument that inconsistencies in the complaining witness’ testimony rendered the verdict against the weight of the evidence. The claimed inconsistencies involve essentially collateral matters and can reasonably be attributed to an apparent deficiency in complainant’s communication skills. Additionally, the complainant’s testimony was substantially corroborated by the testimony of the arresting officers, who observed defendant’s street attack on the complainant and recovered from defendant a razor and the amount claimed to have been stolen. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, defendant’s guilt was sufficiently proven, and an examination of the claimed inconsistencies in the complainant’s testimony, applying reasonable inferences, indicates that the jury gave the evidence the weight it should have been granted *(see, e.g., People v Gonzalez,*158 AD2d 407, *lv denied*75 NY2d 966).

This court perceives no abuse of discretion by the trial court in imposing sentence *(People v Davis,*92 AD2d 177, *affd*61 NY2d 202). Concur—Carro, J. P., Milonas, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,427
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,606
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,041
<PP&E>                                          12,612
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,162
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           894
<OTHER-SE>                                     122,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,204
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,699
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (487)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,847)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,847)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AgFeed Industries, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Xiong
Junhong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:  August
      10, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Xiong JunhongXiong
      JunhongChief
      Executive Officer





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.