alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350

                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Carrie Hartwick, Interim Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
officer) of The Hartcourt Companies, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended December 31, 2004 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                               /s/ Carrie Hartwick
                                               -------------------
                                        Name:  Carrie Hartwick
                                        Date:  April 27, 2005


                                 Exhibit 32.2-1
Exhibit 24

                       POWER OF ATTORNEY

      The  undersigned,  members of the Board  of  Directors  and
Officers   of   SALTON  SEA  FUNDING  CORPORATION,   a   Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), and the following companies:

               Salton Sea Brine Processing, L.P.
               Salton Sea Power Generation, L.P.
               Fish Lake Power Company
               Vulcan Power Company
               CalEnergy Operating Company
               Salton Sea Royalty Company
               BN Geothermal Inc.
               San Felipe Energy Company
               Conejo Energy Company
               Niguel Energy Company
               Vulcan/BN Geothermal Power Company
               Leathers, L.P.
               Del Ranch, L.P.
               Elmore, L.P.

hereby constitute and appoint Steven A. McArthur as his true  and
lawful   attorney-in-fact  and  agent,   with   full   power   of
substitution and resubstitution, for and in his stead, in any and
all  capacities,  to sign on his behalf the Company's  Form  10-K
Annual Report for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1997 and to
execute  any  amendments thereto and to file the same,  with  all
exhibits   thereto,  and  all  other  documents   in   connection
therewith,  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  and
applicable stock exchanges, with the full power and authority  to
do  and  perform  each  and  every act  and  thing  necessary  or
advisable to all intents and purposes as he might or could do  in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-
fact and agent or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully  do
or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Dated as of March 27, 1998.

/s/ David L. Sokol                  /s/ Gregory E. Abel
________________________________   ________________________________
DAVID L. SOKOL                     GREGORY E. ABEL

/s/ Frederick L. Manuel            /s/ Alan J. Wells
________________________________   ________________________________
FREDERICK L. MANUEL                ALAN J. WELLS

/s/ Patrick J. Goodman
________________________________
PATRICK J. GOODMAN
[4910-I3-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Adm..inist.-ation 14CFR Part 39 

## 30/0 [Docket ,No. FAA-2010-0176; Directorate [dentine.- 2009-NM-201-AD; Arnendmen LJ ING,YMBOl 

# 39!~9.!\r,

201O)J_:J)3 ,,,,,";,, 

## , C.C~ RlN 2120-AA64 flATE 

## 'Ii

# 5"1, 0 Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EJ'vfBRAER)Mod 

## Tu

# :rr4-

KOUTI SYMIK> 

# 5 ID ROUT' 0 SYMBO" 

# -10

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FA.A.), Department ofTransportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for tbe products list ERJ 170Airplanes

During ERJ 170airplane full scale fatigue test, cracks were found in some structural components ofthe airplane. Analysis ofthese cracks resulted in modifications on the airplane Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALl), to include new inspections tasks or modification ofexisting ones and its respective thresholds and intervals. INITLAUlIS,G

ROUT''''' ~YM80l Failure to inspect these components according tothe new tasks, thresholds and intervals, could prevent atimely detection offatigue cracks. Undetected fatigue cracks inthese areas could adversely affect the structural integrity ofthese airplanes. DATE QlITlNGSYMllOc



### * 

## * * 

## * * * *
GHG NSPS RIA

Kevin Culligan to

:

dmancini, Nathan Topham

Cc

:

Peter Tsirigotis, Joseph Goffman, RobertJ Wayland, Mary Johnson, Amanda CurryBrown, Ron Evans

From: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US

To: dmancini@omb.eop.gov, Nathan Topham/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph Goffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@E

Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Dom,

Per Gina's e-mail, attached is a red-line/strrikeout version of the RIA. Will send the preamble next.

0 EGU GHG NSPS Exec Summary 0313.docx

 

1 EGU GHG NSPS Introduction 0313.docx

 

2 EGU GHG NSPS Control Strategies 0313.docx

 

3 EGU GHG NSPS Defining Climate Change Problem 0313.docx

 

4 EGU GHG NSPS Electric Power Sector Profile 0313.docx

 

5 EGU GHG NSPS Costs Benefits 0313 complete-v2.docx 

6 EGU GHG NSPS Executive Order 0313.docx
# L_2006346EN.01002601.xml

| 9.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 346/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 346/26

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 30 November 2006

establishing the position to be adopted on behalf of the Community within the Food Aid Committee as regards the extension of the Food Aid Convention 1999

(2006/906/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 181 in conjunction with Article 300(2), second subparagraph, thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Food Aid Convention 1999 (hereinafter the ‘Convention’) was concluded by the Community by Decision 2000/421/EC (1) and extended by decisions of the Food Aid Committee in June 2002, in June 2003 and in June 2005, so as to remain in force until 30 June 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Food Aid Convention 1999 (hereinafter the ‘Convention’) was concluded by the Community by Decision 2000/421/EC (1) and extended by decisions of the Food Aid Committee in June 2002, in June 2003 and in June 2005, so as to remain in force until 30 June 2007.

| (2) | A further one year extension of the Convention is in the interest of both the Community and its Member States. Pursuant to Article XXV(b) of the Convention, that extension is conditional upon the remaining in force, for the same period, of the Grains Trade Convention 1995. The Commission, which represents the Community in the Food Aid Committee, should therefore be authorised by a Council Decision to vote in favour of such extension, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A further one year extension of the Convention is in the interest of both the Community and its Member States. Pursuant to Article XXV(b) of the Convention, that extension is conditional upon the remaining in force, for the same period, of the Grains Trade Convention 1995. The Commission, which represents the Community in the Food Aid Committee, should therefore be authorised by a Council Decision to vote in favour of such extension,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The European Community's position within the Food Aid Committee shall be to vote in favour of the extension of the Food Aid Convention 1999 for a further one year period, on the condition that the Grains Trade Convention 1995 remains in force for the same period.

The Commission is hereby authorised to express this position within the Food Aid Committee.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2006.

For the Council

The President

L. HYSSÄLÄ

---

(1)  
  OJ L 163, 4.7.2000, p. 37.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Burns, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered March 28, 1990, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of twenty-five years to life, unanimously affirmed.

*333Defendant’s claim that the prosecutor erred in summation by inviting the jury to conduct an improper out-of-court experiment is unpreserved and meritless. The prosecutor’s invitation to the jury to measure fifteen seconds was a measured, common sense response to the defense attack on the ability of the eyewitness to make an identification in that amount of time. It is plain that no juror would have considered the viewing of another juror for fifteen seconds as a means of verifying that the eyewitness could see defendant at night under the circumstances indicated in the eyewitness’s testimony. *(Compare, People v Brown,*48 NY2d 388.)

We find no merit to the claim that the court abused its discretion by imposing the maximum sentence. Concur— Carro, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Kupferman, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alfredo Diaz, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered March 29, 1988 convicting him of burglary in the second degree and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant argues that because the jury acquitted him of robbery in the first degree, they necessarily concluded that the People failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he threatened his aunt with a knife in order to gain entrance to her apartment. However, even if we were to adopt this line of reasoning, under no reasonable interpretation of the record could the defendant be considered to have entered the apartment lawfully as a licensee, as he contends. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, the defendant’s relationship with the complainant did not provide a reasonable basis for such a belief on his part, and, moreover, the complainant testified that she did not give the defendant permission to enter after she answered his knock at the apartment door *(see, People v Sandore,*148 AD2d 1000; *People v Bull,*136 AD2d 929; *cf., People v Borazzo,*137 AD2d 96; *People v Insogna,*86 AD2d 979). On this record the jury reasonably could have concluded that the defendant forcibly gained access to the apartment even if they found that he did not use a knife in doing so. Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilty of burglary in the second degree was not against the weight of the evidence *(see, CPL*470.15 [5]).

We also reject the defendant’s contention that the trial court improperly precluded his cross-examination of the complaining witness about a prior false accusation of rape allegedly made 10 years earlier against his brother. "It is well established that the trial courts have broad discretion to keep the proceedings within manageable limits and to curtail exploration of collateral matters [on cross-examination] *(see, e.g., People v Sorge,*301 NY 198)” *(People v Hudy,*73 NY2d 40, 56). It cannot be said that the trial court improvidently exercised that discretion in the present case.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Employment Agreement, dated January 23, 2006



 Exhibit 10.16 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Employment Agreement effective
April 1, 2006 by and among Pregis Holding I Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Pregis I”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Pregis Holding II Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Pregis II”), and Pregis Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (“Pregis”) (Pregis I, Pregis II and Pregis, collectively, the “Employers”) and Andy Brewer (“Executive”) hereby amends the Employment Agreement dated October 12, 2005 among Employers and
Executive, as follows: 
 In Section 2(a), Base Compensation, the phrase “Employers shall pay to Executive as base salary
$241,544 per year” shall be deleted and replaced with “Employers shall pay to Executive as base salary $300,000 per year”. 
 All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement among Employers and Executive shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date and year first above written. 
  

									
	EMPLOYERS:	 		 		 	EXECUTIVE:
			
	PREGIS HOLDING I CORPORATION	 		 	
					
	By:	 	/s/ Steven C. Huston	 		 		 	/s/ Andy Brewer
	Name: Steven C. Huston	 		 		 	Name: Andy Brewer
	Title: Vice President	 		 		 	
			
	PREGIS HOLDING II CORPORATION	 		 	
					
	By:	 	/s/ Steven C. Huston	 		 		 	
	Name: Steven C. Huston	 		 		 	
	Title: Vice President	 		 		 	
			
	PREGIS CORPORATION	 		 	
					
	By:	 	/s/ Steven C. Huston	 		 		 	
	Name: Steven C. Huston	 		 		 	
	Title: Secretary
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1974/2005

of 2 December 2005         

amending Annexes X and XI to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards national reference laboratories and specified risk material

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (1), and in particular the first paragraph of Article 23 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annexes X and XI to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2005.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 147, 31.5.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1292/2005 (OJ L 205, 6.8.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

Annexes X and XI to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 are amended as follows:

----
Table of Contents

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of TAL International Group, Inc. (the‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the periodended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’),I, Chand Khan, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                          |
|--|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                    |
|--|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. |

Date:May  10,  2006

|        |  |                                                    |  |  |  |  |
|--------|--|----------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
|   |  | /s/ ChandKhan                                      |
|   |  | Chand KhanVice President andChief FinancialOfficer |
|        |

----
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2001 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain high tenacity rayon 

filament yarn. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain 

high tenacity rayon filament yarn. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN HIGH TENACITY RAYON FILAMENT 

4 YARN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.07 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 high tenacity single yarn of viscose rayon with a decitex 

8 equal to or greater than 1,000) is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2001 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 21 SUBSIDIARIES OF CHECKFREE CORPORATION Name
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationCheckFree Services Corporation
    
    DelawareCheckFree
i-Solutions International Pte, Ltd.
    
    SingaporeBastogne, Inc.
    
    NevadaCKFR Receivables Corporation
    
    NevadaCheckFree
i-Solutions Australia Pty., Ltd.
    
    Victoria, AustraliaCheckFree
Software & Services (UK), Limited
    
    United KingdomHelioGraph, Ltd.
    
    United KingdomHelioGraph Inc.
    
    DelawareCheckFree i-Solutions Limited
    
    United KingdomCheckFree Investment Corporation
    
    NevadaCheckFree i-Solutions, Inc.
    
    DelawareCheckFree i-Solutions Corp.
    
    Ontario, CanadaAmerican Payment Holdco, Inc.
    
    DelawareAmerican Payment Systems, Inc.
    
    ConnecticutAmerican Payment Systems of California, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaAmerican Payment Systems of New York, Inc.
    
    Delaware
Exhibit 32.1**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of State National Bancshares, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tom C. Nichols, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.      STATE NATIONAL BANCSHARES, INC.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Johnson, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, J.), rendered April 5, 1989, convicting defendant of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent, indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 4 Vi to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

In a "buy and bust” operation, an undercover police officer approached defendant and inquired about purchasing drugs. Defendant provided a smaller quantity than the officer had requested, but the officer did not pay him for the vials. Defendant then led the officer to a nearby drug seller, who provided the officer with the quantity requested in return for $30. Defendant then followed the officer, demanding crack or money from her. The officer gave him $2.

The record shows that defendant was not "doing a favor” for the officer; that defendant displayed an independent interest in escorting the officer to a nearby drug dealer; that defendant and the drug dealer had had other dealings; and *368that defendant was expecting compensation for his service. *(See, People v Lam Lek Chong,*45 NY2d 64, 74-75, *cert denied*439 US 935.) This evidence was sufficient to disprove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was acting as an agent for the undercover officer. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ross and Smith, JJ.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SWMX, Inc., (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joshua Wexler, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

       (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

November 14, 2007

                                      /s/ Joshua Wexler
                                      -------------------------------
                                      Joshua Wexler
                                      Chief Executive Officer
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2037 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain sensitizing dyes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

sensitizing dyes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SENSITIZING DYES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.37 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain sensitizing dyes) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to goods entered, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2037 IS

1 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS