alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006107EN.01002701.xml

| 20.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 107/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 107/27

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 608/2006

of 19 April 2006

amending Regulation (EC) No 1060/2005 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the export of common wheat held by the Slovak intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1060/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the export of 147 949 tonnes of common wheat held by the Slovak intervention agency. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1060/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the export of 147 949 tonnes of common wheat held by the Slovak intervention agency.

| (2) | Slovakia has informed the Commission of its intervention agency’s intention to increase by 81 909 tonnes the quantity put out to tender for export. In view of the quantities available and the market situation, the request made by the Slovakia should be granted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Slovakia has informed the Commission of its intervention agency’s intention to increase by 81 909 tonnes the quantity put out to tender for export. In view of the quantities available and the market situation, the request made by the Slovakia should be granted.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 1060/2005 should therefore be amended. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 1060/2005 should therefore be amended.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2005 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 2

The invitation to tender shall cover a maximum of 229 858 tonnes of common wheat for export to third countries with the exception of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Liechtenstein, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro (*1) and Switzerland.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 April 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1606/2005 (OJ L 256, 1.10.2005, p. 11).

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          340191
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3208
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                345628
<PP&E>                                        39309364
<DEPRECIATION>                                   18487
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                40923656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           198638
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    39928815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  40923656
<SALES>                                        4586494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6260631
<CGS>                                          3495314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   282817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                367179
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2115321
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2115321
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2115321
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    38.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    38.84
        

</TABLE>
#### George ALONSO, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff).

No. 85-89.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Jan. 8, 1986.

Leonard D. Munker, State Public Defender, and Martin J. McClain, Appellate Counsel, Wyoming Public Defender Program, for appellant.

A.G. McClintock, Atty. Gen., Gerald A. Stack, Deputy Atty. Gen., John W. Ren-neisen, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., and Nicholas Yassallo, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before THOMAS, C.J., and ROONEY *, BROWN, and CARDINE, JJ., and GUTHRIE, J., Retired.

Retired November 30, 1985.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged and convicted of forgery under § 6-3-602(a)(ii), W.S. 1977 (June 1983 Replacement), and attempted forgery under § 6-l-301(a)(i), W.S.1977 (June 1983 Replacement). Appeal is taken from these convictions upon the theory that appellant could only have been charged under the credit card fraud section, being § 6-3-802, W.S. 1977, 1985 Cum.Supp.

It is seldom that an appellant confronts a case so nearly identical as *Hutchins v.*
      *356
      *State,*Wyo., 483 P.2d 519 (1971), which involved the same statutes and contention. The same question was raised earlier this term in the case of *Binger v. State,*Wyo., 712 P.2d 349 (1986). Appellant in that case relied upon the same authorities as here argued and which this Court rejected. Disposal of this case is governed by the two before-mentioned cases.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SHINE MEDIA ACQUISITION CORP (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A1 for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      the undersigned’s knowledge:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
      certified.




SHINE
                MEDIA ACQUISITION CORP.




Date:
                  August 21, 2008
              By:
              /s/
                  David Y. ChenDavid
                  Y. Chen
                Chief
                  Executive Officer/S/
                  Hock S. OngHock
                  S. Ong
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris Craddock, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Keewatin Windpower
      Corp., for the fiscal quarter ended February 29, 2008, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                          

Date: April 14, 2008



/s/ Chris Craddock
_____________________________________________Chris Craddock Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer)

---
# L_2006115EN.01001701.xml

| 28.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 115/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 115/17

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 646/2006

of 27 April 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 25 April 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 25 April 2006.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 25 April 2006, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 7,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 April 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 409/2006 (OJ L 71, 10.3.2006, p. 5).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1814/2005 (OJ L 292, 8.11.2005, p. 3).

3

---
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

783 

CA 11-00281 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, FAHEY, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

SHAWN STENGLEIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

JOHN REIGLE, DEFENDANT, 

AND QUALITY HOMES OF ROCHESTER, INC., 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

RUPP, BAASE, PFALZGRAF, CUNNINGHAM & COPPOLA LLC, ROCHESTER (MATTHEW

A. LENHARD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

RINERE & RINERE, LLP, ROCHESTER (JOSEPH D. RINERE OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Ann

Marie Taddeo, J.), entered May 5, 2010 in a personal injury action. 

Insofar as appealed from, the order, inter alia, granted the motion of

plaintiff for partial summary judgment against defendant Quality Homes

of Rochester, Inc. pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1) and denied that

part of the cross motion of defendant Quality Homes of Rochester, Inc.

for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s Labor Law § 240 (1) claim. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at Supreme Court.

Entered: June 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caribou Coffee Company, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rosalyn Mallet, President, Chief Operating Officerand Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.May 8, 2008              /s/ Rosalyn Mallet   Rosalyn Mallet   President, Chief Operating Officer
##### 



CRAY INC.
PARENT & SUBSIDIARIES LIST
 Parent /Subsidiary Name
    
    Date Formed
    
    Country/State
    
    % OwnershipCray Inc.
    
    12/07/87
    
    U.S./Washington State
    
    ParentCray Australia Pty Ltd.
    
    03/23/00
    
    Australia
    
    100%Cray Brazil, Inc.
    
    08/25/00
    
    U.S./Washington State
    
    100%Cray Computadores do Brasil Ltda.
    
    11/17/00
    
    Brazil
    
    100%Cray Canada (Washington), Inc.
    
    03/17/00
    
    U.S./Washington State
    
    100%Cray Canada Corporation
    
    03/20/00
    
    Canada
    
    100%Cray China Limited
    
    08/07/00
    
    China
    
    100%Cray Computer Finland Oy
    
    06/20/00
    
    Finland
    
    100%Cray Computer SAS
    
    04/03/00
    
    France
    
    100%Cray Computer Deutschland GmbH
    
    03/31/00
    
    Germany
    
    100%Cray Supercomputers (Israel) Ltd.
    
    09/16/01
    
    Israel
    
    100%Cray Italy S.r.l.
    
    07/12/00
    
    Italy
    
    100%Cray Japan, Inc.
    
    03/17/00
    
    U.S./Washington State
    
    100%Cray Korea, Inc.
    
    03/17/00
    
    U.S./Washington State
    
    100%Cray Netherlands B.V.
    
    06/23/00
    
    Netherlands
    
    100%Cray Computer South Africa (Proprietary) Limited
    
    02/23/00
    
    South Africa
    
    100%Cray Computer Spain, S.L.
    
    03/30/00
    
    Spain
    
    100%Cray-Tera Sweden AB
    
    03/03/99
    
    Sweden
    
    100%Cray Computer GmbH
    
    04/05/00
    
    Switzerland
    
    100%Cray Taiwan, Inc.
    
    04/05/01
    
    U.S./Washington State
    
    100%Cray U.K. Limited
    
    03/07/00
    
    United Kingdom
    
    100%
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended January
2, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ MICHAEL J. THORNEMichael J. ThorneSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 10, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2018 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2018

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain organic pigments 
                               and dyes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain organic pigments 
                               and dyes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ORGANIC PIGMENTS AND DYES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.07 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain organic pigments and 
dyes) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, George E. Mileusnic, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Caribou Coffee Company, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.November 9, 2007       /s/ George E. Mileusnic   George E. Mileusnic   Chief Financial Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2016 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bricorr 288. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bricorr 288. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BRICORR 288. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Phosphonic acid, maleic anhydride sodium salt complex 

(CAS No. 180513–31–9) 

(provided for in subheading 

3824.90.92) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2016 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO T HE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-0XLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Jesus Oliveras, Chief Financial Officer of International Power Group, Ltd., the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on 10Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: August 18, 2008



/s/Jesus Oliveras



Jesus Oliveras

(Principal Financial Officer)