alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                         Ad Hoc Advisory Committee on the Merit Review Process (MRPAC).                    

*Date/Time:*                         March 28, 2012; 12 p.m.-4 p.m., EDT.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room I-360 Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ms. Victoria Fung, National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA, 22230. Email:                         *vfung@nsf.gov.*

If you plan to attend the meeting, please send an email with your name and affiliation to the individual listed above, by the day before the meeting, so that a visitor badge can be prepared.

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice concerning issues related to NSF's merit review process.                    

## Agenda

    - Welcome.
    - Update on outreach activities.
    - Discussion of potential pilots of enhancements to the merit review process.

                        For latest details information, please check with this following link:                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​      ( print page 14571)    od/​oia/​additional_​resources/​AC-MeritReview/​index.jsp*.                    

Dated: March 7, 2012.

 Susanne Bolton,

 Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-5861 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1995 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain soap and lotion pumps. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain soap and lotion 

pumps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SOAP AND LOTION PUMPS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Plastic or metal hand-operated, portable lotion or soap 

pumps not designed to be affixed to a wall, countertop or 

cabinet (provided for in subheading 8424.89.00) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1995 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-1133V

UNPUBLISHED

ROMAN GELEVAN,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: February 16, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.

Kimberly Shubert Davey, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On March 29, 2021, Roman Gelevan filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barre syndrome (“GBS”) as a 

result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on November 4, 2019. Petition at 1. 

Petitioner further alleges that he received the vaccine in the United States, that his 

symptoms have continued for more than six months, and that he has not received

compensation in the form of an award or settlement for his injuries. Petition at 1, 10. The 

case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On February 15, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

1. Specifically, Respondent has reviewed the petitioner and medical records, and has 

concluded that Petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table 

and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation for flu-vaccine related GBS. Id. at 6. 

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
# Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District

MARCH 24, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b).

1. Case No. SD32429

Re: STATE OF MISSOURI,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

vs. JEREMY ELIJAH ZAPATA,

Defendant-Appellant.
Prepared and filed by St Ives Financial






Exhibit
  4(e)


AMENDMENT TO 


CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


FOR


ATLAS AMERICA PUBLIC #16-2007(B) L.P. 




















    PAGE
      1

    


    Delaware

    The
      First State

     

    I,
      HARRIET SMITH WINDSOR, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO
      HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
      AMENDMENT OF “ATLAS AMERICA PUBLIC #16-2007(B) L.P.”,
      CHANGING ITS NAME FROM “ATLAS AMERICA PUBLIC #16-2007(B)
L.P.” TO “ATLAS RESOURCES PUBLIC #16-2007(B) L.P.”,
FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE
      FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY, A.D. 2007, AT
12 O'CLOCK P.M.

     

    

  	 	 	/s/ Harriet Smith
        Windsor
	
        4212742     
          8100 

      	
         

         	
        
          

        

        Harriet
          Smith Windsor, Secretary of State

      
	
         

        070015524

      	
        AUTHENTICATION:
          5331275 

         

        DATE:
          01-05-07

      


    














      	 	
              State
                of Delaware 

              Secretary
                of State 

              Division
                of Corporations 

              Delivered
                12:00 PM 01/05/2007 

              FILED
                12:00 PM 01/05/2007

              SRV
                070015524 - 4212742 FILE

            


    

    


    STATE
      OF DELAWARE

    AMENDMENT
      TO THE CERTIFICATE OF

    LIMITED
      PARTNERSHIP

     

    The
      undersigned, desiring to amend the Certificate of Limited Partnership pursuant
      to the provisions of Section 17-202 of the Revised Uniform Limited Partnership
      Act of the State of Delaware, does hereby certify as follows:

     

    FIRST:
      The name of the Limited Partnership is Atlas America Public #16-2007(B)
      L.P.

     

    SECOND:
      Article 1 of the Certificate of Limited Partnership shall be amended
      as
      follows: the name of the Limited Partnership shall be Atlas Resources Public
      #16-2007(B) L.P.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned executed this Amendment to the Certificate
      of
      Limited Partnership on this 3rd day of January, A.D.
      2007.

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	
              Atlas
                America Public #16-2007(B) L.P.

            
	 	
              By: 
                Atlas Resources, LLC

              
                Managing
                  General Partner

              

            
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	
            	
            	/s/ Karen
              A.
              Black
	 	
              

              Karen
                A. Black, Vice President -

Partnership
                Administration
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In      connection with the Annual Report of MangoSoft, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form      10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities      and      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dale Vincent, Chief      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,      as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|      |                                                                                                  |   |   |   |
|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| By:  | /s/ Dale                Vincent                                                                  |   |   |   |
|      | Chief                  Executive Officer (principal executive and financial                  officer) |   |   |        |
|      | February                  1, 2008                                                                     |   |   |   |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                 SUBSIDIARIES OF
                         INTERNATIONAL WIRE GROUP, INC.



<Table>
<Caption>
                                                               JURISDICTION OF
                                                               INCORPORATION OR
SUSIDIARY                                                      ORGANIZATION
<S>                                                            <C>
Omega Wire, Inc...........................................     Delaware
OWI Corporation...........................................     New York
Wire Technologies, Inc....................................     Indiana
Camden Wire Company, Inc..................................     New York
IWG-Philippines, Inc......................................     Philippines
IWG International, Inc....................................     Barbados
International Wire Rome Operations, Inc...................     Delaware
IWG Resources LLC.........................................     Delaware
Italtrecce-Societa Italiana Trecce & Affini, S.r.l........     Italy
International Wire, S.A.S.................................     France
International Wire Group, S.A.S...........................     France
Tresse Metallique J. Forissier, S.A.......................     France
Cablerie E. Charbonnet, S.A...............................     France
IWG Services Co., S de RL de CV...........................     Mexico
IWG Durango, S de RL de CV................................     Mexico
</Table>
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
             THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                         TRIATHLON BROADCASTING COMPANY

            (Pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporations Law
                           of the State of Delaware)

         Triathlon Broadcasting Company (the "Corporation") , a corporation
organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the "DGCL"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

    FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, acting in accordance
with Section 242(b) of the DGCL, unanimously adopted a resolution setting forth
a proposed amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
of the Corporation (the "Certificate") to repeal Article 4.5 and directed that
the amendment be submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation for their
review, adoption and approval at the Corporation's 1996 annual meeting. The
resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

         RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
         interest of the Corporation that Article 4.5 of the Certificate be
         repealed in its entirety.

    SECOND: That thereafter, at the 1996 annual meeting of the stockholders of
the Corporation called in accordance with Section 222 of the DGCL, a majority
of the outstanding stock of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon approved a
proposal to repeal Article 4.5 in its entirety, as required by Section 242(b)
of the DGCL.

    THIRD: That the amendment to the Certificate has been duly adopted in
accordance with Section 242 of the DGCL.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by Norman Feuer, its Chief Executive Officer, this 14th day of February
1997.


                                            By: /s/ Norman Feuer
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Norman Feuer,
                                               Chief Executive Officer
----

**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**SECTION        1350 CERTIFICATION**

**OF          THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

| (1)   | the                    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months                    ended                    June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                    as amended;                    and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                    the                    Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Chappaqua Building Corp., Appellant, v RGF Development Corp., Respondent.

In an action for the recovery of the down payment on a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated October 17, 1989, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied its cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the language of the subject contract, together with the parties’ conduct, established that the initial closing date specified by the contract was not intended to be a "time of the essence” date. Accordingly, the defendant was entitled to a reasonable adjournment to complete performance of its obligations under the contract *(see, 3M Holding Corp. v Wagner,*166 AD2d 580; *4200 Ave. K*
      *672
      *Realty Corp. v 4200 Realty Co.,*123 AD2d 419). The plaintiffs refusal to grant a reasonable adjournment thus constituted a wrongful repudiation of the contract, which bars the plaintiff from recovery of its down payment *(see, Leading Bldg. Corp. v Segrete,*60 AD2d 907). Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *869Parul Patel, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), rendered March 8, 1989, convicting her of criminally negligent homicide, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress her statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In reviewing suppression issues, great weight must be accorded the determination of the hearing court, with its particular advantages of having seen and heard the witnesses. That determination should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761; *People v Norris,*122 AD2d 82, 83). In this case, the hearing court determined that the defendant was advised of her constitutional rights and executed a knowing and intelligent waiver thereof prior to making her audio and videotaped statements to the police. That determination is supported by the record and should not be disturbed *(see, People v Prochilo, supra; People v Norris, supra).*

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that although it was solely circumstantial, it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The inferences to be drawn from the proven facts, viewed as a whole, are inconsistent with her claim of innocence and exclude to a moral certainty every hypothesis but guilt *(see, People v Kennedy,*47 NY2d 196; *People v Sims,*110 AD2d 214, 222-223).

It is apparent from the record that the jury credited the testimony of the Medical Examiner as to the cause of the death of the defendant’s daughter over that of the defendant’s medical experts. The only inference that was required to be drawn from the facts, then, was the identity of the perpetrator. The defendant was the sole custodian of her daughter on the evening of August 12, 1987. In her statements to the police, she admitted that the children sometimes "make [her] mind crazy” and that, when they did so, she hit them. She also admitted hitting her daughter several times before bringing her to the hospital. Under these circumstances, the proof was sufficient for the jury to infer that her daughter’s death occurred as a result of the actions of the defendant *(see, People v Sims, supra*at 224). Upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against *870the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________ Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000484 20-NOV-2013 10:31 AM

SCWC-12-0000484 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
SUSANNE M. LUNSFORD, Individually and as Personal Representative of the

Estate of BRIAN F. MCVEY, Deceased,

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SURGICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.; FONG-LIANG FAN, M.D.; JOSE A. GANEL, M.D., Respondents/Defendants-Appellees

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000484; CIV. NO. 09-1-2310) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna and Pollack, JJ.) Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants Susanne M. Lunsford, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Brian F. McVey, Deceased’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on October 18, 2013, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, November 20, 2013. Dennis W. King Aaron Loeser for petitioners /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack
#### Charles Kennedy et al., Appellants, v Dominick Lomei, Respondent.

In an action to rescind an agreement and to recover damages based on fraud, the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Difede, J.H.O.), dated July 10, 1989, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed their complaint and is in favor of the defendant on his counterclaim and against them in the principal sum of $46,000.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, Charles Kennedy (hereinafter Kennedy) entered into an agreement with the defendant whereby he bought for $52,000 the defendant’s right to purchase, at wholesale price, bakery products manufactured by "Pellegrino Bakery” as well as other products in order to distribute them within a specified geographical area. Kennedy agreed to give the defendant a mortgage on a house owned by him and his mother, the plaintiff Veronica Kennedy, to secure part of the purchase price. Several months later, Pellegrino Bakery went out of business and the plaintiffs commenced this action against the defendant seeking a rescission of the agreement as well as damages for fraud. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendant, having sold to Kennedy a franchise, violated the disclosure provisions of General Business Law article 33, *685which regulates franchises. Thus, the plaintiffs argued, had they been aware of the financial difficulties of Pellegrino Bakery, they would not have entered into the agreement.

Although the trial court did not specifically address this issue, we agree with the defendant that the agreement is not subject to the provisions of General Business Law article 33. The agreement between Kennedy and the defendant did not involve a franchise. Fifty percent of the products that Kennedy distributed were not products of Pellegrino Bakery. Also, Pellegrino Bakery in no way regulated or controlled Kennedy’s sales activities *(cf,. Aristacar Corp. v Attorney-General of State of N. Y.,*143 Misc 2d 551). Moreover, Kennedy did not pay a franchise fee, an essential element of a franchise under General Business Law § 681 (3) (a) and (b). Therefore, the agreement between the parties was not subject to the provisions contained in the General Business Law pertaining to franchises. Finally, there was no evidence demonstrating that the defendant knew that Pellegrino Bakery would go out of business. Thompson, J. P., Fiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.