alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

December 15, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-20-00806-CV

IN RE CHRISTOPHER DUPUY, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-89958

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 3, 2020, relator Christopher Dupuy filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. 

P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Daryl Moore, 

presiding judge of the 333rd District Court of Harris County, to rule on relator’s 

Rule 91a motion to dismiss. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 91a.
2

On December 7, 2020, the trial court signed an order denying relator’s motion. 

Therefore, relator’s request for relief is now moot.

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of 

jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Poissant.
# L_2006211EN.01002201.xml

| 1.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/22

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1175/2006

of 31 July 2006

on the issue of system B export licences in the fruit and vegetables sector (lemons)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1961/2001 of 8 October 2001 on detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards export refunds on fruit and vegetables (2), and in particular Article 6(6) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 858/2006 (3) fixes the indicative quantities for which system B export licences may be issued. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 858/2006 (3) fixes the indicative quantities for which system B export licences may be issued.

| (2) | In the light of the information available to the Commission today, there is a risk that the indicative quantities laid down for the current export period for lemons will shortly be exceeded. This overrun will prejudice the proper working of the export refund scheme in the fruit and vegetables sector. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In the light of the information available to the Commission today, there is a risk that the indicative quantities laid down for the current export period for lemons will shortly be exceeded. This overrun will prejudice the proper working of the export refund scheme in the fruit and vegetables sector.

| (3) | To avoid this situation, applications for system B licences for lemons after 31 July 2006 should be rejected until the end of the current export period, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

To avoid this situation, applications for system B licences for lemons after 31 July 2006 should be rejected until the end of the current export period,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for system B export licences for lemons submitted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 858/2006, export declarations for which are accepted after 31 July 2006 and before 1 November 2006, are hereby rejected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 August 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 July 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 268, 9.10.2001, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 159, 19.6.2006, p. 5.

3

---
EXHIBIT
32.1














CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Resource Capital Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jonathan Z. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








August
      8, 2008
            /s/
      Jonathan Z. CohenJonathan
      Z. CohenChief
      Executive Officer
# Journal officiel C 210A/25 m

| | ISSN 1977-0936 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 210A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 65e année25 mai 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0936

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 210A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

65e année25 mai 2022

---

| Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- |
| | Rectificatifs |
| 2022/C 210 A/01 | Rectificatif à l’entreprise commune Une Europe fondée sur la bioéconomie circulaire (CBE JU) — Publication d’un avis de vacance pour le poste de directeur exécutif/directrice exécutive (Agent temporaire — Grade AD 14) — COM/2022/20077 ( JO C 206 A du 23.5.2022 ) | 1 |

Sommaire

page

Rectificatifs

2022/C 210 A/01

Rectificatif à l’entreprise commune Une Europe fondée sur la bioéconomie circulaire (CBE JU) — Publication d’un avis de vacance pour le poste de directeur exécutif/directrice exécutive (Agent temporaire — Grade AD 14) — COM/2022/20077 ( JO C 206 A du 23.5.2022 )

( JO C 206 A du 23.5.2022 )

1

---

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

Rectificatifs

| 25.5.2022 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 210/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2022

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 210/1

---

Rectificatif à l’entreprise commune «Une Europe fondée sur la bioéconomie circulaire» (CBE JU) — Publication d’un avis de vacance pour le poste de directeur exécutif/directrice exécutive (Agent temporaire — Grade AD 14) — COM/2022/20077

(
  «Journal officiel de l’Union européenne» C 206 A du 23 mai 2022
  )

(2022/C 210 A/01)

Page 5, «Date limite de dépôt des candidatures», premier alinéa:

| au lieu de: | «La date limite de dépôt des candidatures est fixée au 13 juin 2022 à 12h00 (midi), heure de Bruxelles. L’inscription en ligne ne sera plus possible après cette date.», |
| --- | --- |

au lieu de:

«La date limite de dépôt des candidatures est fixée au 13 juin 2022 à 12h00 (midi), heure de Bruxelles. L’inscription en ligne ne sera plus possible après cette date.»,

| lire: | «La date limite de dépôt des candidatures est fixée au 4 juillet 2022, à 12 h 00, heure de Bruxelles. L’inscription en ligne ne sera plus possible après cette date.». |
| --- | --- |

lire:

lire:

«La date limite de dépôt des candidatures est fixée au 4 juillet 2022, à 12 h 00, heure de Bruxelles. L’inscription en ligne ne sera plus possible après cette date.».

---
(May 28, 1991)

#### Carmen Artache, Respondent, v Jerrold Goldin, Defendant, and Arnold A. Brenhouse, Nonparty Appellant.

In a consolidated action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract and unjust enrichment, nonparty Arnold A. Brenhouse, the former attorney for the plaintiff, appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Saladino, J.), entered November 10, 1988, which after a hearing, *inter alia,*determined that he had been discharged for cause and denied his claim for a retaining or charging lien.

Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the facts, with costs, and a charging lien in the amount of $37,500 is fixed in favor of the appellant.

We find that the weight of the credible evidence established that the appellant was discharged without cause. The appellant’s representation of the plaintiff was entirely competent and successful up until the time of his discharge. In addition, a potential conflict of interest involving the appellant was fully disclosed to the plaintiff and she chose to continue to be represented by the appellant. Indeed, the discharge occurred solely as a result of a fee dispute. Accordingly, the appellant is entitled to a charging lien for the reasonable value of services rendered prior to the date of substitution of counsel *(see, Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co.,*73 NY2d 454; *Luciano v Trabucco,*159 AD2d 695; Judiciary Law § 475). We find the reasonable value of the work performed on behalf of the plaintiff for which the appellant was not compensated to be $37,500. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Brown and Balletta, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CheckFree Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David E. Mangum,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: September 12, 2003

                         /s/ David E. Mangum
                         -----------------------------------------------------
                         David E. Mangum
                         Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
                         CheckFree Corporation
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3703

_____________________________

JOHN WESLEY MONTGOMERY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

J. Scott Duncan, Judge.

April 15, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

WOLF, BILBREY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

John Wesley Montgomery, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Susan J. Allread, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Greenville Federal FinancialCorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: February 12, 2008 /s/Susan J. Allread   Susan J. Allread   Chief Financial Officer
#### Marvin Joseph WARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-83-759.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Dec. 11, 1985.

*767S. Daniel George, Sallisaw, for appellant.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., Tomilou Gentry Liddell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

Marvin Joseph Ward was convicted of Robbery with Firearms in the District Court of McIntosh County. He received a sentence of five (5) years’ imprisonment.

On the evening of January 24, 1979, a man entered Walker’s Liquor Store in Che-cotah, Oklahoma and asked the clerk, Lila Payne, for a fifth of Brass Monkey. She turned to get the liquor and as she turned back around she saw the man was pointing a weapon at her. He told her “this is a stick-up,” and she complied with his command to open the cash register, from which he took $230.00 — $240.00. About three days later, Sheriff Donald Beaver showed to her photographs of potential suspects. She identified appellant as the man who robbed her.

Lila Payne testified at the hearing on appellant’s motion to suppress the in-court identification that she was shown not more than four pictures by the sheriff. She said she no longer actually remembered how many. The sheriff testified that he showed her from eight to ten pictures, but he had only four pictures left in the envelope of those photographs since some had been used in other lineups. Because of poor records made of the photographic identification session, the district court sustained appellant’s motion in limine to suppress this evidence. There was no evidence of suggestiveness, although one photograph was of a man of American Indian characteristics; appellant apparently is not an Indian.

 Appellant now claims the trial court erred in not suppressing Ms. Payne’s in-court identification of him. However, appellant lodged no objection to the in-court identification. We have consistently held that objection must be made at trial to the introduction of evidence in order to preserve for review error in its admission. *See, e.g., Roberts v. State,*568 P.2d 336 (Okl.Cr.1977). We do note, however, that even if a pre-trial lineup is improper, this will not require suppression of in-court identification. *Green v. State,*594 P.2d 767 (Okl.Cr.1979).

Appellant asserts too that the jury should have been given a cautionary instruction regarding the eyewitness identification. However, the record is void of a request of such an instruction at trial. We have consistently held that submission of a written requested instruction to the trial court is necessary to preserve review of instructional errors on appeal. *Jetton v. State,*632 P.2d 432 (Okl.Cr.1981); *Lewis v. State,*541 P.2d 251 (Okl.Cr.1975).

Ms. Payne positively identified appellant as the robber on a number of occasions; she never wavered in her identification or failed to identify appellant. Finding no error meriting reversal or modification, judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.

PARKS, P.J., concurs.

BRETT, J., concurs in results.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

134190 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan DOROTHY GARRELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 134190 COA: 275632 WCAC: 06-000190 SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, a/k/a SMART, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 7, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
# L_2007145EN.01003801.xml

| 7.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 145/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 145/38

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 210 of 31 July 2006
  )

On page 49, Article 46(3):

for:

‘3.   If the Member State decides to undertake technical assistance actions in the framework of each operational programme, the proportion of the total amount of expenditure for technical assistance in respect of each operational programme shall not exceed the limits set in paragraph 1.

In this case, where technical assistance actions are also undertaken in the form of a specific operational programme, the total amount of expenditure for technical assistance in such a specific programme shall not cause the total proportion of Funds allocated to technical assistance to exceed the limits set in paragraph 1.’,

read:

‘3.   If the Member State decides to undertake technical assistance actions in the framework of each operational programme, the proportion of the total amount allocated for technical assistance in respect of each operational programme shall not exceed the limits set in paragraph 1.

In this case, where technical assistance actions are also undertaken in the form of a specific operational programme, the total amount allocated for technical assistance in such a specific programme shall not cause the total proportion of Funds allocated to technical assistance to exceed the limits set in paragraph 1.’

---
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Red Rock Pictures Holdings Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending February 29, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Robert Levy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            Such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending February
      29, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ending February 29, 2008, fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Red Rock
      Pictures Holdings Inc.




Dated: April
21, 2008






RED
ROCK PICTURES HOLDINGS INC.




By:
            /s/
      Robert Levy


Robert
Levy


Chief
Executive Officer
From: Llenza, Charles 

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 8:02:10 PM 

Subject: Notification of public meeting date change for the test procedure rulemaking for walk-in 

coolers and walk-in freezers (WICF) (Docket No. EERE-2008-BT-TP-0014, RIN 1904-AB85) 

Auto forwarded by a Rule 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

The Department of Energy published a notice in the Federal Register on January 4, 

2010, concerning a public meeting and availability of the notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NOPR) regarding test procedures for walk-in coolers and walk-in freezers (WICF). 

 

The attached notice changes the date of the public meeting, the date of the deadline for 

requesting to speak at the public meeting, and the date of the deadline for submitting 

written comments on the framework document because the scheduled public meeting of 

February 11, 2010, was cancelled due to inclement weather, which forced a Federal 

Government shutdown. 

 

The public meeting will now be held on Wednesday, March 24, 2010, beginning at 9:00 

a.m. The close of the comment period has been changed to March 31, 2010 in order to 

accommodate comments received at the public meeting and comments that may be 

submitted based on issues raised at the public meeting.

 

For further information please go to the following WICF web page:

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/wicf_test_proc

edure_rulemaking.html

Regards,

 

Charles Llenza

Project Manager/Engineer

US Department of Energy

(202)586-2192(work)

(202)287-1590(fax) 

Charles.Llenza@ee.doe.gov 

 

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

*******************************************************************************************

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED 

FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMES ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED 

EERE-2008-BT-TP-0014 DOC ID 1.2.006
RECIPIENT, OR AN EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED 

RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY 

PROHIBITED. IF THIS MESSAGE CONTAINS NON-PUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT ANY CONSUMER OR CUSTOMER 

OF THE SENDER OR INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE FURTHER PROHIBITED UNDER PENALTY OF LAW FROM USING OR 

DISCLOSING THE INFORMATION TO ANY THIRD PARTY BY PROVISIONS OF THE FEDERAL GRAMM-LEACH-BAILEY ACT. IF 

YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US BY 

TELEPHONE AND RETURN OR DESTROY THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO ASSURE THAT IT IS NOT READ, COPIED, OR 

DISTRIBUTED BY OTHERS. 

EERE-2008-BT-TP-0014 DOC ID 1.2.006