alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40614

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

RICHARD WILLIAM KNIGHT,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 379

Filed: February 19, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Canyon County. Hon. Renae J. Hoff, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of ten years, for two counts of lewd conduct with minor 

under sixteen; and a concurrent unified sentence of fifteen yeas with five years 

determinate for one count of sexual abuse of a child under sixteen, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Richard William Knight was found guilty of two counts of lewd conduct with minor 

under sixteen, Idaho Code § 18-1508; and one count of sexual abuse of a child under sixteen, 

I.C. § 18-1506(b). The district court sentenced Knight to a unified term of twenty years, with a 

minimum period of confinement of ten years for the two counts of lewd conduct with a minor 

under sixteen, and a concurrent unified sentence of fifteen years with five years determinate for 

the one count of sexual abuse of a child under sixteen. Knight appeals asserting that the district 

court abused its discretion by imposing excessive sentences.
2

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Knight’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14516-14517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5842]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 349-173--Alabama]


Alabama Power Company, Martin Dam Hydroelectric Project; Notice 
of Proposed Revised Restricted Service List for a Programmatic 
Agreement for Managing Properties Included in or Eligible for Inclusion 
in the National Register of Historic Places

    Rule 2010 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's 
(Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.2010, provides 
that, to eliminate unnecessary expense or improve administrative 
efficiency, the Secretary may establish a restricted service list for a 
particular phase or issue in a proceeding. The restricted service list 
should contain the names of persons on the service list who, in the 
judgment of the decisional authority establishing the list, are active 
participants with respect to the phase or issue in the proceeding for 
which the list is established.
    The Commission staff is consulting with the Alabama State Historic 
Preservation Officer (Alabama SHPO) and the Advisory Council on 
Historic Preservation (Advisory Council) pursuant to the Advisory 
Council's regulations, 36 CFR part 800, implementing section 106 of the 
National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 470f), to 
prepare a Programmatic Agreement for managing properties included in, 
or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places 
at the Martin Dam Hydroelectric Project.
    The Programmatic Agreement, when executed by the Commission, the 
Alabama SHPO, and the Advisory Council, would satisfy the Commission's 
section 106 responsibilities for all individual undertakings carried 
out in accordance with the license until the license expires or is 
terminated (36 CFR 800.13(e)). The Commission's responsibilities 
pursuant to section 106 for the Martin Dam Hydroelectric Project would 
be fulfilled through the Programmatic Agreement, which the Commission 
staff proposes to draft in consultation with the Alabama SHPO; Alabama 
Power Company, the licensee for Project No. 349-173; the Poarch Band of 
Creek Indians; the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma; the Alabama-Quassarte 
Tribal Town; the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas; and the Thlopthlocco 
Tribal Town.
    For purposes of commenting on the Programmatic Agreement, we 
propose to add the following persons to the

[[Page 14517]]

restricted service list for the Martin Dam Hydroelectric Project to 
represent the interests of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation of Oklahoma and 
the Kialegee Tribal Town of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation: Principal 
Chief A.D. Ellis, Muscogee (Creek) Nation of Oklahoma, P.O. Box 580, 
Okmulgee, OK 74447; Mekko Tiger Hobia, Kialegee Tribal Town of the 
Muscogee, (Creek) Nation, P.O. Box 332, Wetumpka, OK 74883.

    Dated: March 5, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5842 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
----

| SIGNATURE             |   | TITLE                      |   | DATE              |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|-------------------|
|                  |   |                       |   |              |
| /s/ Merton J. Segal   |   | Chairman and Director      |   | February 11, 2011 |
| Merton J. Segal       |   |                       |   |              |
|                  |   |                       |   |              |
| /s/ Robert S. Cubbin  |   | President, Chief Executive |   | February 11, 2011 |
| Robert S. Cubbin      |   | Officer and Director       |   |              |
|                  |   |                       |   |              |
| /s/ Robert W. Sturgis |   | Director                   |   | February 11, 2011 |
| Robert W. Sturgis     |   |                       |   |              |
|                  |   |                       |   |              |
| /s/ David K. Page     |   | Director                   |   | February 11, 2011 |
| David K. Page         |   |                       |   |              |
|                  |   |                       |   |              |
| /s/ Hugh W. Greenberg |   | Director                   |   | February 11, 2011 |
| Hugh W. Greenberg     |   |                       |   |              |

----

| SIGNATURE              |   | TITLE    |   | DATE              |
|------------------------|--------|----------|--------|-------------------|
|                   |   |     |   |              |
| /s/ Bruce E. Thal      |   | Director |   | February 11, 2011 |
| Bruce E. Thal          |   |     |   |              |
|                   |   |     |   |              |
| /s/ Herbert Tyner      |   | Director |   | February 11, 2011 |
| Herbert Tyner          |   |     |   |              |
|                   |   |     |   |              |
| /s/ Florine Mark       |   | Director |   | February 11, 2011 |
| Florine Mark           |   |     |   |              |
|                   |   |     |   |              |
| /s/ Robert H. Naftaly  |   | Director |   | February 11, 2011 |
| Robert H. Naftaly      |   |     |   |              |
|                   |   |     |   |              |
| /s/ Robert F. Fix      |   | Director |   | February 11, 2011 |
| Robert F. Fix          |   |     |   |              |
|                   |   |     |   |              |
| /s/ Jeffrey A. Maffett |   | Director |   | February 11, 2011 |
| Jeffrey A. Maffett     |   |     |   |              |

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Charles E. Johnson, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Proliance International, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

|                      |  |  |                                                         |
|----------------------|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March 30, 2007 |  |  | /s/ Charles E. Johnson                                  |
|                 |  |  | Charles E. JohnsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer |
|                      |

----
# L_2006124EN.01001201.xml

| 11.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 124/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 124/12

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 715/2006

of 10 May 2006

on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat (2),

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f).

| (2) | Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 at 11 500 t. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 at 11 500 t.

| (3) | It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 May 2006 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.

2.   Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of June 2006 for 10 283,529 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 May 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 May 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 408/2006 (OJ L 71, 10.3.2006, p. 3).

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Triple Crown Media, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterly period ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his individual knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 14, 2009



|        |  |                                                     
|------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Signed: |  | /s/ MARK G. MEIKLE                                  
|        |  | Mark G. Meikle                                      
|        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, regardless of any general incorporation language in said filing.
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Nuance
      Resources Corp. for the quarter ended November 30, 2006, I certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Nuance Resources Corp. for the quarter
              ended November 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
              quarter ended November 30, 2006, fairly presents in all material respects,
              the financial condition and results of operations of Nuance Resources
              Corp..
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                James D. BunneyName:
            James
                D. BunneyTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer,
              Principal
                Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
            February
                9, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JIMMY LEE WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-72-BO, CA-96-14-4-BO)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: February 16, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Lee Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s judgment or order is marked as

“filed” on April 21, 2000, the district court’s record shows that

it was entered on the docket sheet on May 4, 2000. Pursuant to

Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

the date that the judgment or order was entered on the docket sheet

that we take as the effective date of the district court’s

decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir.

1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Lee Williams appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-93-72-BO; CA-96-14-

4-BO (E.D.N.C. May 4, 2000).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 7, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-01096-CR No. 05-21-01097-CR No. 05-21-01098-CR KODY LYNNCLAY BLEVINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TE XAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F21-7016 3-V, F21-70164-V & F21-70162-V

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Jus tice Myers, and Justice Nowell Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Before the Court are appella nt’s December 23, 2021 motions to withdraw his
appeals. The motions are signed by appellate counsel and appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 42.2(a). We grant the motions and dismiss these appeals.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b) 211096F.U05 /Robert D. Bu r ns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

KODY LYNNCLAY BLEVINS, Appellant

No. 05-21-01096-CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F21-70163-V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Myers and Nowell participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.

Judgment entered January 7, 2022–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

KODY LYNNCLAY BLEVINS, Appellant

No. 05-21-01097-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F21-70164-V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Myers and Nowell participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.

Judgment entered January 7, 2022–4– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

KODY LYNNCLAY BLEVINS, Appellant

No. 05-21-01098-CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F21-70162-V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Myers and Nowell participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.

Judgment entered January 7, 2022
**Exhibit
        32.1**
  CERTIFICATIONS
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of SHINE MEDIA ACQUISITION CORP (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
        undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
        of
        the undersigned’s knowledge:
  (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
        certified.
  SHINE
                  MEDIA ACQUISITION CORP.
 
 Date:August
                  8, 2007
              By:
              /s/
                  David Y. ChenDavid
                  Y. ChenChief
                  Executive Officer/S/
                  Hock S. OngHock
                  S. Ong
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
  25