alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Bruzon, Also Known as Carlito Bruzon, Appellant.

—Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Howard Bell, J.), rendered June 14, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of three counts of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, three counts of attempted coercion in the first degree, and three counts of menacing, and sentencing him to three three to six year terms, three two to four year terms, and three six-month prison terms, all to run concurrently, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s *Sandoval*"compromise” *(People v Hicks,*88 AD2d 519) was not an abuse of discretion. Defendant had a significant criminal history, but had he opted to testify, the jury would have learned only that he had been convicted of a single crime. The proof that defendant possessed "white powder” and drug paraphernalia several months before he threatened the new landlord of his building was properly admitted into evidence on defendant’s motive. *(People v Moore,*42 NY2d 421, 428, *cert denied*434 US 987; *People v Munger,*24 NY2d 445, 449.) Nor did the prosecutor err by arguing on summation that the white powder received from defendant in May 1988 was cocaine. The argument was reasonably related to the evidence.

The trial court did not err by excluding extrinsic evidence of the complainant’s credibility. The proffered testimony that the complainant had asked for "key” money from two other persons was collateral to the issues raised at trial. *(People v Cade,*73 NY2d 904, 905.) We find no merit to defendant’s claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. *(People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137; *People v Brown,*45 NY2d 852.)

Defendant’s remaining claims are unpreserved, and were we to reach them in the interest of justice, we would find them lacking in merit. Concur—Carro, J. P., Milonas, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 38 (Friday, February 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 9930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04225]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property 
Release at Beverly Airport in Beverly, MA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. Section 47153(d), 
notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request from 
Beverly Airport in Beverly, MA to change the use of a certain parcel of 
land and associated building from Aeronautical to Non-Aeronautical Land 
for future non-aeronautical revenue generation at Beverly Airport in 
Beverly, MA.
    The subject parcel contains Building #45 and 19 automobile parking 
spaces which is currently vacant and is landside with no access to 
aviation areas. The building is in poor condition. The City of Beverly, 
working with the Beverly Airport Commission, will renovate the building 
and in the near term, serve as office space for a City Department. 
Space within the building will also be prepared for future lease to 
generate non-aeronautical revenue for the airport. The cost to renovate 
the building was estimated at a minimum of approximately $300,000 and 
will serve as the in-lieu lease payment over the next 10 years. The 
area for non-aeronautical revenue generation for the airport will be 
derived from leasing of this space by the airport and those proceeds 
will be deposited into the Airport's dedicated fund and will be used 
for continued operation and maintenance of the airport. At the end of 
the 10 year lease with the City, the building will be available for 
future non-aeronautical lease revenue generation for the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 28, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov, and follow the instructions on providing comments.
     Fax: 202-493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W 12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Interested persons may inspect the request and supporting documents 
by contacting the FAA at the address listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jorge E. Panteli, Compliance and 
Land Use Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration New England Region 
Airports Division, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts, 
Telephone 781-238-7618.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on February 16, 2016.
Mary T. Walsh,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-04225 Filed 2-25-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Bryant, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Zweibel, J.), rendered April 18, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree, and criminal possession of a hypodermic instrument, upon a jury verdict, and imposing *722sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the evidence adduced at the hearing established that the police officer had probable cause to arrest him. The testimony established that the arresting officer observed that the defendant was having great difficulty in attempting to park a Buick automobile. The officer approached the vehicle and observed that the motor was running even though the ignition key was in the "off’ position, and that a rag had been tied around the steering column. Moreover, upon observing the officer, the defendant exited the vehicle and began to walk away slowly, leaving the engine running. These circumstances, taken together, were sufficient to lead a reasonable person possessing the same expertise as the arresting officer to conclude that the defendant was in possession of a stolen vehicle *(see, People v McKay,*124 AD2d 828).

Moreover, the defendant’s claims that he was denied a fair trial by the prosecutor’s statements during summation and by an alleged violation of CPL 710.30 (1) (a) are unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to reach the issues in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction under the circumstances of this case.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         Each director and/or officer of CheckFree Holdings Corporation (the
"Corporation") whose signature appears below hereby appoints Peter J. Kight,
Mark A. Johnson, and Curtis A. Loveland as the undersigned's attorneys or any of
them individually as the undersigned's attorney, to sign, in the undersigned's
name and behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 1998, and likewise to sign and file with the Commission any and
all amendments to the Form 10-K, and the Corporation hereby also appoints such
persons as its attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its attorney-in-fact with
like authority to sign and file the Form 10-K and any amendments thereto
granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and
revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such attorney-in-fact or the
undersigned's substitute may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 31th day of
August, 1998.

Signature                               Title


/s/  Peter J. Kight                    Chairman of the Board of Directors, 
------------------------------         President, and Chief Executive Officer
     Peter J. Kight                    


 /s/ Mark A. Johnson                   Vice Chairman, Corporate Development and
------------------------------         Marketing, Director
     Mark A. Johnson                    


/s/  Allen L. Shulman                  Executive Vice President, Chief 
------------------------------         Financial Officer and General Counsel
     Allen L. Shulman                   


/s/  Gary A. Luoma, Jr.                Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer
------------------------------         and Assistant Secretary
     Gary A. Luoma, Jr.                 


/s/  William P. Boardman               Director
------------------------------
     William P. Boardman


/s/  George R. Manser                  Director
------------------------------
     George R. Manser


 /s/ Eugene F. Quinn                   Director
------------------------------
     Eugene F. Quinn


/s/  Jeffrey M. Wilkins                Director
------------------------------
     Jeffrey M. Wilkins
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1343

KOOSHA E. POUYAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID M. SMITH; MIKE G. SHENIGO; AUTOMATED

CONVEYOR SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-28-L)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Koosha Pouyan, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Cornelius Wood, III,

Kristine H. Smith, EDMUNDS & WILLIAMS, P.C., Lynchburg, Virginia,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Koosha Pouyan appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action filed pursuant to Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e2 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Pouyan v. Smith, No. CA-95-28-L

(W.D. Va. Feb. 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40873

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUANA YULIANA MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-244-1

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juana Yuliana 

Martinez-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Ramirez has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40873 Document: 00512598322 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
13-40873

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40873 Document: 00512598322 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Chris Craddock, Chief Executive Officer and Chief  Financial Officer of Sky Harvest Windpower Corp. (the “Company”) hereby  certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

(a) the Quarterly Report  on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended August 31, 2009 (the  “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section  15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the  information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April  16, 2010

/s/ Chris CraddockChris CraddockChief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sky Harvest Windpower Corp. and will be retained by Sky Harvest Windpower Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EX-10.29



 





Exhibit 10.29




SouthStar Energy Services LLC




Certified Resolutions



RESOLVED, that Exhibit D of the LLC Agreement be amended to include a 70% Allocable Share for
Georgia Natural Gas Company and a 30% Allocable Share for Piedmont Energy Company for income
derived from the Ohio market, based on a proper allocation of the Company’s cost of conducting
business in the Ohio market versus its other current markets.




*****************



I, Michael A. Braswell, President of SouthStar Energy Services LLC, do hereby certify that the
foregoing is a full, true and complete extract from the Written Consent of the Executive Committee
of SouthStar Energy Services LLC dated as of August 28, 2006.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Corporate Seal of SouthStar
Energy Services LLC, this the 20th day of November, 2006.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Michael A. Braswell
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Michael A. Braswell — President
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2060 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2060

          To suspend temporarily the duty on pyraflufen ethyl.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on pyraflufen ethyl.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PYRAFLUFEN ETHYL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Ethyl 2-chloro-5-   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (4-chloro-5-                                                       31/2011.......
                          difluoromethoxy-1-
                          methylpyrazol-3-
                          yl)-4-
                          fluorophenoxyacet
                          ate (Pyraflufen-
                          ethyl) (CAS No.
                          129630-19-9)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2933.19.23)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07535

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 07535\07535_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07535\07535_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 07535\07535_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07535\07535_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07535\07535_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

07535\Certification Statement Plant ID 07535.pdf Plant certification statement

x 07535\Supplemental Documents\07535_A5-3 WB Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07535\Supplemental Documents\07535_AEP ELGs ICR submittal letter 9-13-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07535\Supplemental Documents\07535_AEP WLK 07535 A5-2 Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1928 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on golf bag bodies 

made of woven fabrics of nylon or polyester sewn together with pockets, 

and dividers or graphite protectors, accompanied with rainhoods. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. BAUCUS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty 

on golf bag bodies made of woven fabrics of nylon or 

polyester sewn together with pockets, and dividers or 

graphite protectors, accompanied with rainhoods. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1928 IS

1 SECTION 1. GOLF BAG BODIES MADE OF WOVEN FABRICS 

2 OF NYLON OR POLYESTER SEWN TOGETHER 

3 WITH POCKETS, AND DIVIDERS OR GRAPHITE 

4 PROTECTORS, ACCOMPANIED WITH 

5 RAINHOODS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.24 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 golf bag bodies made of woven fabrics of nylon or polyester 

9 sewn together with pockets, and dividers or graphite pro10 tectors, accompanied with rainhoods) is amended— 

11 (1) by amending the article description to read 

12 as follows: ‘‘Golf bag bodies made of woven fabrics 

13 of nylon or polyester sewn together with pockets, 

14 and dividers or graphite protectors, accompanied 

15 with rainhoods’’; and 

16 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting 

17 ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

20 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

21 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0356

______________________________________________________________________________

DONALD AARON HESSER, JR.,

 Petitioner and Appellant

 vs.

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Respondent and Appellee.

______________________________________________________________________________

Order Extending Deadline to File Opening Brief

______________________________________________________________________________

Upon reviewing the Petitioner/Appellant’s Second Unopposed Motion to 

Extension of Deadline to File Appellant’s Opening Brief, good cause exists to grant 

the motion. Pursuant to the authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until November 30, 2023, to file and serve 

the opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 7 2023

11/07/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0356
# L_2006238EN.01001201.xml

| 1.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 238/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 238/12

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1300/2006

of 31 August 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 958/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 31 August 2006, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 31 August 2006, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 31 August 2006, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 shall be 36,965 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 September 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 August 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 49.

2

---