alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### B-S Industrial Contractors, Inc., Respondent, v Town of Wells, Appellant.

Harvey, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (White, J.), entered June 29, 1990 in Hamilton County, which, *inter alia,*denied defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action in the amended complaint.

This action stems from a contract entered into between the parties in April 1987 regarding a public works project in Hamilton County known as the Lake Algonquin Hydroelectric Project. Following competitive bids for the project, plaintiff successfully submitted a lump-sum bid to perform the equipment installation and the construction of the project. Pursuant to the contract, defendant was to pay plaintiff $1,798,200 in installments. Plaintiff claims that it completed its work under the contract by the date set forth in the parties’ agreement. Plaintiff further contends that, prior to the completion of the original work, defendant’s engineers requested that it perform extra work not set forth in the contract, for which it then claimed it was owed an additional amount of almost $200,000. When this money was not forthcoming, plaintiff commenced suit seeking the extra compensation as well as the unpaid balance of $122,096 that defendant refused to pay pursuant to the original contract. Following joinder of issue defendant moved for partial summary judgment, princi*1054pally seeking the dismissal of plaintiff’s breach of contract claim on the basis that plaintiff allegedly failed to perform a condition precedent in the contract. Finding questions of fact on this issue, Supreme Court denied defendant’s motion. This appeal followed.

We affirm. As we have repeatedly stated, "[s]ummary judgment is a drastic remedy which should not be granted where there is any doubt as to the existence of a triable issue” *(Passonno v Hall,*125 AD2d 767, 768; *see, Al-Care, C.S.W. v Blue Shield,*169 AD2d 909). The court’s focus is on issue finding, not issue solving, and all competent evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion *(Passonno v Hall, supra,*at 768). Here, although both parties take pains to cite various clauses in their contracts which allegedly support their respective positions, it is apparent that Supreme Court correctly found that the issues must be resolved at trial. Although defendant maintains that plaintiff did not follow certain procedures in the contract that would entitle it to payment, plaintiff’s papers sufficiently raise enough doubt on this issue that summary resolution at this point would be improper *(see,*CPLR 3212 [b]).

Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Re: Petition for Exemption Dockent No FAA-2012-0847 

Daniel Jacquet 

ANM-115, Airframe & Cabin Safety 

to

: William.Ertle, Mark Forseth 

 

 

Cc

: Linda.Dorey, Scott.Coyne, Vanessa.Geidel 

 

 

 

From: <William.Ertle@PATSAIRCRAFT.COM> 

To: Daniel Jacquet/ANM/FAA@FAA 

Cc: <Vanessa.Geidel@PATSAIRCRAFT.COM>, <Linda.Dorey@PATSAIRCRAFT.COM>, <Scott.Coyne@PATSAIRCRAF

Date: 08/28/2012 08:38 AM 

Subject: Petition for Exemption Dockent No FAA-2012-0847 

Hi Dan,

It was good talking with you, and thank you for your help in resolving this issue.

   

In response to the request for additional information addressing 14 CFR 11.81(h), I provide the following

justification for exercising the privileges of this exemption outside the Unite States:

   

Customers are purchasing center‐aisle air transport jet aircraft (larger than the typical corporate

business jets) for personal and business transportation because they wish to create a flexible product

that can meet the needs of individuals and frequently operate these aircraft outside the United States.

   

Please feel free to contact me if you need additional information and Thank You for your help

   

Best Regards

   

Bill

   

   

William J. Ertle II, DER, ASC | Manager, ODA Operations | STC ODA Administrator, Aircraft Interiors | 

PATS Aircraft Systems 

21652 Nanticoke Avenue | Georgetown, DE 19947 

: 302.253.6180 | Cell: 302.855.0327 

: william.ertle@patsaircraft.com
# L_2014095DE.01007001.xml

| 29.3.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 95/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 95/70

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2006/105/EG des Rates vom 20. November 2006 zur Anpassung der Richtlinien 79/409/EWG, 92/43/EWG, 97/68/EG, 2001/80/EG und 2001/81/EG im Bereich Umwelt anlässlich des Beitritts Bulgariens und Rumäniens

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 363 vom 20. Dezember 2006
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 363 vom 20. Dezember 2006

Auf Seite 404, Anhang, neuer Anhang V der Richtlinie 92/43/EWG, Abschnitt „a)
  TIERE
  , WIRBELTIERE, SÄUGETIERE, RODENTIA, Castoridae, Castor fiber“:

TIERE

Castoridae, Castor fiber

anstatt:

„Castor fiber (ausgenommen die finnischen, schwedischen, lettischen, litauischen, estnischen und polnischen Populationen)“

muss es heißen:

„Castor fiber (finnische, schwedische, lettische, litauische, estnische und polnische Populationen)“.

---
# L_2007233EN.01000701.xml

| 5.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 233/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 233/7

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 of 25 September 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating in the People's Republic of China and Thailand, and terminating the proceeding on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating in Malaysia

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 270 of 29 September 2006
  )

On page 38, in Annex I, under the list of Chinese producers:

for:

‘JINAN BAIHE PLASTIC PRODUCTS COMPANY LIMITED’,

read:

‘JINAN BAIHE PLASTIC CO., LTD’.

---
---

Exhibit 32.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                          
|---------------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. § 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                             
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Icon
  Development, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
  March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
  hereof (the Report), I, Wayne Smith, Chief Financial Officer and
  Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.

|May 17, 2007 | /s/
      Wayne Smith                             
|------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|             | Wayne Smith                                       
|             | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer             
|             | (Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer)

---
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a- 14(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures, and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ PETER J. UNGAROPeter J. UngaroChief Executive Officer and President
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of SWMX,  Inc., (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for  quarterly  period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Joshua  Wexler,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a)
             of 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
             material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
             operations of the Company.

May 14, 2007

                                              /s/ Joshua Wexler
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Joshua Wexler
                                              Chief Executive Officer
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2054 

To suspend temporarily the duty on knit tank tops of stretch fabric with 

textile or polymer-based electrodes knit into or attached to the fabric 

and that incorporate connectors designed to secure an electronic transmitter that transmits physiological information from the electrodes to 

a compatible monitor. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on knit tank tops of stretch 

fabric with textile or polymer-based electrodes knit into 

or attached to the fabric and that incorporate connectors 

designed to secure an electronic transmitter that transmits physiological information from the electrodes to a 

compatible monitor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2054 IS

1 SECTION 1. KNIT TANK TOPS OF STRETCH FABRIC WITH 

2 TEXTILE OR POLYMER-BASED ELECTRODES 

3 KNIT INTO OR ATTACHED TO THE FABRIC 

4 AND THAT INCORPORATE CONNECTORS DE5 SIGNED TO SECURE AN ELECTRONIC TRANS6 MITTER THAT TRANSMITS PHYSIOLOGICAL 

7 INFORMATION FROM THE ELECTRODES TO A 

8 COMPATIBLE MONITOR. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

10 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

11 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

12 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Knit tank tops of stretch fabric with textile or polymerbased electrodes knit into or 

attached to the fabric and 

that incorporate connectors 

designed to secure an electronic transmitter that transmits physiological information from the electrodes to a 

compatible monitor (provided 

for in subheading 

6109.90.10) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

15 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Kaye R. O’Leary, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Caribou Coffee Company, Inc.2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.May 8, 2008              /s/ Kaye R. O’Leary   Kaye R. O’Leary   Acting Chief Financial Officer
# L_2006294EN.01003101.xml

| 25.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 294/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 294/31

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1590/2006

of 24 October 2006

determining the extent to which the applications for import licences lodged from 16 to 18 October 2006 for butter originating in New Zealand under the import tariff quota managed according to Regulation (EC) No 1452/2006 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1452/2006 of 29 September 2006 providing for interim measures for the management of a tariff quota for New Zealand butter for October to December 2006 and derogating from (EC) Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 (2) and in particular Article 3(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | 7 applications for import licences for butter originating in New Zealand (under quota No 09.4589) were lodged in the competent authorities from 16 to 18 October 2006 according to Regulation (EC) No 1452/2006. These applications concerned a total of 14 294,6 tonnes. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

7 applications for import licences for butter originating in New Zealand (under quota No 09.4589) were lodged in the competent authorities from 16 to 18 October 2006 according to Regulation (EC) No 1452/2006. These applications concerned a total of 14 294,6 tonnes.

| (2) | As this quantity is equal to the available quantity of 14 294,6 tonnes, all applications can be accepted, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As this quantity is equal to the available quantity of 14 294,6 tonnes, all applications can be accepted,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for import licences for butter originating in New Zealand lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1452/2006 from 16 to18 October 2006 and notified to the Commission by 20 October 2006 shall be accepted.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 271, 30.9.2006, p. 40.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5847]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-1195-000]


Camden County Energy Recovery, Associates, L.P.; Supplemental 
Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for 
Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Camden County Energy Recovery Associates, L.P.'s application for 
market-based rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting 
that such application includes a request for blanket authorization, 
under 18 CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions 
of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is March 26, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#65232037262a0b090c0b00361015150a171125030017064b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33757661707c5d5f5a5d56604643435c414773555641501d545c45">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 5, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5847 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>