alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Robert J. Hanks, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 of Harbor AcquisitionCorporation

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:

 

(a)       Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)       Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)       All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 14, 2006 

 
|   |                            |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | /s/ ROBERT J. HANKS             |
|   | Robert J. Hanks                 |
|   | *Chief Executive and Treasurer* |
|   | *(Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                      [LETTERHEAD OF COOPERS & LYBRAND]


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 19,
1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. as of December 31, 1997
and 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which
report was incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

COOPERS & LYBRAND LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 30, 1998
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

s0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

141167

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141167 COA: 288218 Ingham CC: 07-000483-FC DONTRELL MAURICE CROSBY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 8, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

D AVIS



### , J., not participating. I recuse myse lf and am not par ticipating because I was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1868 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on hydroxylamine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on 

hydroxylamine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HYDROXYLAMINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.03 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 hydroxylamine) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1868 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5738]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a Commercial 
Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as 
a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Intertek USA, Inc., 1145 Fourth Street, Gretna, LA 70053, 
has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and 
petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 
151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory 
analyses and gauger services should request and receive written 
assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or 
gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the 
specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved 
to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by 
calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1c7f7e6c32707d7e746d5c78746f327b736a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e6d6c7e20626f6c667f4e6a667d20696178">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories: 
http://cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/trade/automated/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/gaulist.ctt/gaulist.pdf.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on August 17, 2011. 
The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for August 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mike McCormick, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: February 29, 2012.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-5738 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES- OXLEY ACT OF 2002    I, James W. FitzGibbons, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of International Power Group, Ltd. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date:  May 21, 2007   /s/ James W. FitzGibbonsJames W. FitzGibbons Controller and Chief Accounting Officer(Principal Financial Officer )
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**RAVEN
      GOLD CORP.**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**




**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
        Blair
        Naughty, the Chief Executive Officer of Raven Gold Corp. (the "Company"),
        certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
        the
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
        July
        31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or
        15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
        and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Raven Gold Corp. and will be retained by Raven Gold Corp. and furnished to
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Date:
                  June 22, 2007*/s/
                  Blair Naughty*
                
                Blair
                  NaughtyChief
                  Executive Officer
p. 1



# JU L 

# 24 201 3 DuPon t Chemical s an d Fluoroproduct

s Chamber s Work s Deepwater,N

J 0802 3

Director , Chemica

l Contro l Divisio n U S Environmenta

l Protectio n Agency Offic e o f Pollutio n Preventio n an

d Toxic s EP A Eas t Jun e 21 , 201 3 CBI C Contro l Numbe r 

# 35495 1

Room414 6 - 120 1 Constitutio n Avenue , N W o % Washington , D C 2000

4 Re : EP A - H Q - OPP T - 200 3 - 001 2 DuPon tChamber

s Works NJPDE S Permi tNo . NJ000510 0 PFO A Data Submitta

l - Outfal l DSN66

2 Weekl y Gra b Sample

s Ma y 201 3 Sample Data Dea r Chemica l Contro l Division : Attache d pleas e fin d summarie s o f PFO A analytica

l results fo r

th e DuPon t Chamber s Work s weekly gra

b samples take

n a t interna l outfal l DSN662 A i n Ma y 2013

. I n accordanc

e wit h th e curren t sit e NJPDE S permi t (NJ0005100 , effectiv e Septembe r 2011) , thes

e results ar

e provide d to NJDE P on amonthl y basi s vi aelectroni c discharge monitorin g reports
. Th e enclosure s include tw o pape

r an d tw o electroni c copie s o f th e analytica

l result s fro mthi s monitorin g period

.

Jacque s Monteux * Uni t Manager-Sit

e Manufacturin g System s DuPon t Chamber s Work s

CM/cl c Enclosure s
# L_2006203EN.01000301.xml

| 26.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 203/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 203/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1133/2006

of 25 July 2006

determining to what extent import right applications submitted during the month of June 2006 for certain live bovine animals as part of a tariff quota provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005 may be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005 of 28 July 2005 laying down detailed rules for the application of a tariff quota for certain live bovine animals originating in Bulgaria, provided for in Council Decision 2003/286/EC (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005 fixes at 7 200 the number of head of live bovine animals originating in Bulgaria which may be imported under special conditions in the period of 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005 fixes at 7 200 the number of head of live bovine animals originating in Bulgaria which may be imported under special conditions in the period of 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007.

| (2) | Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005 lays down that the quantities applied for may be reduced. The applications lodged relate to total quantities which exceed the quantities available. Under these circumstances and taking care to ensure an equitable distribution of the available quantities, it is appropriate to reduce proportionally the quantities applied for, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005 lays down that the quantities applied for may be reduced. The applications lodged relate to total quantities which exceed the quantities available. Under these circumstances and taking care to ensure an equitable distribution of the available quantities, it is appropriate to reduce proportionally the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

All applications for import rights lodged pursuant to Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005 shall be accepted at a rate of 23,5448 % of the import rates applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 July 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 199, 29.7.2005, p. 33.

2

---
# L_2006261EN.01002301.xml

| 22.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 261/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 261/23

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1398/2006

of 21 September 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1278/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1278/2006 of 25 August 2006 on a special intervention measure for cereals in Finland and Sweden for the 2006/2007 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1278/2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1278/2006.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 15 to 21 September 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1278/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 22 September 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States

Done at Brussels, 21 September 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 233, 26.8.2006, p. 6.

3

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

May 31, 2018 Session Heard at Nashville

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HENRY LEE JONES

Automatic Appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals

Criminal Court for Shelby County

No. 03-06997 W. Mark Ward, Judge

___________________________________

No. W2015-02210-SC-DDT-DD

___________________________________

SHARON G. LEE, J., concurring. 

I concur in the Court’s opinion except for the analysis regarding the

proportionality review. In 1997, this Court narrowed the scope of the proportionality 

review required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-13-206(c)(1)(D) by limiting 

consideration to only those cases in which the death penalty had been sought. State v. 

Bland, 958 S.W.2d 651, 666 (Tenn. 1997). A majority of this Court reaffirmed this 

truncated approach in State v. Pruitt, 415 S.W.3d 180, 217 (Tenn. 2013). In Pruitt, I 

joined Justice William C. Koch, Jr. in dissenting from the Court’s decision to continue 

following the Bland approach, as it improperly narrowed the proportionality review

required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-13-206(c)(1)(D). Pruitt, 415 S.W.3d at 

230 (Koch and Lee, JJ., concurring and dissenting). We determined that the Court should 

return to its pre-Bland proportionality analysis by considering “all first degree murder 

cases in which life imprisonment or a sentence of death has been imposed” and focusing 

on whether the case under review more closely resembles cases that have resulted in the 

imposition of the death penalty than those that have not. Id. at 230–31 (Koch and Lee, JJ., 

concurring and dissenting).

I have performed the broader, pre-Bland review in this case, as I find it more 

consistent with the requirement of Tennessee Code Annotated section

39-13-206(c)(1)(D). Based on a review of similar first degree murder cases, including 

those in which the death penalty was not sought, I have concluded that Mr. Jones’s 

personal background and the nature of the crimes he committed more closely resemble 

the personal backgrounds and the crimes committed by other persons who have received 

a death sentence than those that have not. Accordingly, as required by Tennessee Code 

Annotated section 39-13-206(c)(1)(D) and based on the facts in this record, I find that 

01/30/2019
- 2 -

Mr. Jones’s death sentence is “[neither] excessive [n]or disproportionate to the penalty 

imposed in similar cases, considering both the nature of the crime and the defendant.” 

_________________________________

SHARON G. LEE, JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.4

        Report of Dellinger & Deese, L.L.P., Independent Auditors of SCS



Board of Directors
Summit Computer Services, Inc. (SCS)
Charlotte, North Carolina


We have  audited  the  balance  sheet of Summit  Computer  Services,  Inc.  (the
Company) as of December  31, 1995,  and the related  statements  of  operations,
shareholders'  investment  and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
separately  herein).  These financial  statements are the  responsibility of the
Company's  management.  Our  responsibility  is to  express  an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards  require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance   about  whether  the  financial   statements  are  free  of  material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and  significant  estimates  made by
management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,  the  financial  statements  referred to in the first  paragraph
present  fairly,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  position of Summit
Computer  Services,  Inc.  as of  December  31,  1995,  and the  results  of its
operations  and its cash  flows  for the year then  ended,  in  conformity  with
generally accepted accounting principles.





                                                        Dellinger & Deese,L.L.P.
Charlotte, North Carolina
March 28, 1996
Exhibit 31.1





Certification


Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), As Adopted


Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Michael A. Bless, certify that:


|   |                                                                                                      
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Century Aluminum Company;

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




By:/s/ Michael A. BlessName:Michael A. BlessTitle:President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:April 30, 2013