alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE WMA CORPORATION FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         2,054,231
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               2,054,231
<CASH>                                       3,475,950
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           2,985,937
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      39,750,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,007,850
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              4,494,786
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             10,303,562
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,405,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,007,850
<PREMIUMS>                                   9,692,649
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            349,683
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (66,000)
<OTHER-INCOME>                              12,683,009
<BENEFITS>                                   4,825,148
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  3,789,318
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         5,362,263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,545,506
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,225,472
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,320,034
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,320,034
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.73
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (the Trust) and iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Investing Pool
LLC (the Investing Pool) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Latham, Chief Financial Officer of Barclays
Global Investors International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust and Manager of the Investing Pool, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust and Investing
Pool.



|                              |  | 
|----------------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 11, 2009           
|                             
|/s/ Michael A. Latham        
|Michael A. Latham *          
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and the Co-Registrant is a limited liability company and Mr. Latham is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors
International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant and Manager of the Co-Registrant.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order entered February 2 7 , 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 01764

- CV

PAIN CONTROL INSTITU TE, INC., Appellant

V.

ALLSTATE PROPERTY AN D CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial Di strict Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 13599



### O RDER

We GRANT appellant’s February 26, 2014 motion for leave to file an amended brief.

Appellant shall file its amended brief on or before MARCH 7, 2014

.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Triple Crown Media, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his individual knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 13, 2008



|        |  |                                      
|------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Signed: |  | /s/ ROBERT S. PRATHER, JR.           
|        |  | Robert S. Prather, Jr.               
|        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, regardless of any general incorporation language in said filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1956 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1956

       To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzenamine, 4 Dodecyl.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzenamine, 4 Dodecyl.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENZENAMINE, 4 DODECYL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Benzenamine, 4      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        Dodecyl (CAS No.                                                   31/2011.......
                        104-42-7)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2921.49.45)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2017 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2017

              To suspend temporarily the duty on Coflake.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To suspend temporarily the duty on Coflake.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COFLAKE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Mixtures of         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        polyethylene                                                       31/2011.......
                        glycol (CAS No.
                        25322-68-3),
                        (acetato)pentammi
                        ne cobalt
                        dinitrate (CAS
                        No. 14854-63-8),
                        and zinc
                        carbonate (CAS
                        No. 3486-35-9)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3815.90.50)......

    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Such subchapter is further amended by 
striking heading 9902.03.34.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ellis Gerber, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.), rendered on December 4, 1989, convicting defendant of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate prison term of from 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed. The case is *405remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The complainant testified that as he entered the men’s room at the IRT 86th Street subway station he saw a man standing at a urinal. Moments later this person reached into complainant’s pants pocket and took money from his wallet while the complainant was seated in an unlocked stall. The complainant identified defendant as the thief in a line-up some 2 *Vi*months later.

There was sufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that defendant was the perpetrator. *(See, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621.) Neither the lighting conditions nor the partition in the restroom would have prevented the complainant from clearly seeing the perpetrator’s face. The complainant identified defendant at the line-up without hesitation. The jury had ample basis to credit complainant’s testimony, and discounted unsupported suggestions that he had entered the restroom to engage in sexual conduct and had concocted the larceny story. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1869 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on mixed xylidines. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on mixed 

xylidines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXED XYLIDINES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.36 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 mixed xylidines) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1869 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                          22,352
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (341)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,303
<PP&E>                                           8,061
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (4,473)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,096
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                     178,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,274
<SALES>                                        153,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,150
<CGS>                                          119,344
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,540
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,617
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,923
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,392
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,315
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.4










     Report of Dellinger & Deese, L.L.P., Independent Auditors of SCS



Board of Directors
Summit Computer Services, Inc. (SCS)
Charlotte, North Carolina


We have  audited  the  balance  sheet of Summit  Computer  Services,  Inc.  (the
Company) as of December  31, 1995,  and the related  statements  of  operations,
shareholders'  investment  and cash flows for each of the years in the  two-year
period  ended  December  31,  1995  (not  presented  separately  herein).  These
financial  statements are the  responsibility of the Company's  management.  Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion on these financial  statements based on
our audits.

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  generally   accepted  auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and  significant  estimates  made by
management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,  the  financial  statements  referred to in the first  paragraph
present  fairly,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  position of Summit
Computer  Services,  Inc.  as of  December  31,  1995,  and the  results  of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles





                                                   Dellinger & Deese, L.L.P.



Charlotte, North Carolina
March 28, 1996
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
 MAPCO Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of MAPCO Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 1997 (none of which are presented
herein). Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed at
Item 14(a)2 in the MAPCO Inc. 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K (not presented
herein). These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MAPCO Inc. and
subsidiaries at December 31, 1997, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December
31, 1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in
our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to
the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 16 to the MAPCO Inc. consolidated financial statements
(Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements of Williams Holdings of
Delaware, Inc.), MAPCO Inc. is a defendant in litigation relating to an LPG
explosion in April 1992, that occurred near an underground salt dome storage
facility located near Brenham, Texas.

Effective October 1, 1997, MAPCO Inc. changed its method of accounting for
business process reengineering activities to conform to the consensus reached
by the Emerging Issues Task Force in Issue No. 97-13.




Deloitte & Touche LLP
Tulsa, Oklahoma
January 27, 1998
(March 3, 1998, as to Notes 2 and 16 to the
MAPCO Inc. consolidated financial statements)
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Theodore R. Schroeder, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including any consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       /s/ Theodore R. Schroeder Theodore R. Schroeder