alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2009 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2009

       To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 3,3',4,4'-
                  Biphenyltetracarboxylic dianhydride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 3,3',4,4'-
                  Biphenyltetracarboxylic dianhydride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3,3',4,4'-BIPHENYLTETRACARBOXYLIC DIANHYDRIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.11 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 3,3',4,4'-
Biphenyltetracarboxylic dianhydride) is amended by striking ``12/31/
2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Timothy C. Huffmyer, certify that:

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Smith Micro Software, Inc.; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: July 21, 2017 |   | /s/ Timothy C. Huffmyer                    |
|---------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                |   | Timothy C. Huffmyer                        |
|                |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                |   | (Principal Financial Officer)              |
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of First Investors Financial Services, Inc., (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, TommyA. Moore, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                      The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Act of 1934; and

(2)                      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: July 20, 2004

 

 
|   | By: /s/ Tommy A. Moore,  Jr. |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   | Tommy A. Moore, Jr.          |
|   | Chief Executive Officer      |

 

----
July 29 , 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

APRIL BROWN, DAVID R AFFERTY, STEVE GANN, KATHY HILTON,
IRENE GARCIA AND STEVE STU CKEY , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 14

- 00491

- CV V.

WILLIAM HENSLEE, TOM JENKINS, TROY JONES, DAVID MARKS, BARNARD PEARL, THOMA S WALSH, STAN WILLIA MS, JACK EREIRA AND ANDREW ROSENBERG ’S , Appellee s

________________ ________________ Today the Court heard appellant s ’ motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on May 22, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

.
We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order that mandate be issued immediately.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 10081 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Gary Von Bennett,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21

- CR

- 427

- 1

**____________________ __________**  Before **Elrod, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Gary Von Bennett pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm after a felony conviction, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) . The district court sentenced him to 108 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Bennett contends that § 922( g)(1) is unconstitutional because it exceeds Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause and that

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 18, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10081 Document: 00516936006 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2023No. 23

- 10081

2 § 922(g) should be construed to require either recent movement of a firearm across state lines or movement of a firearm across state lines in response to the d efendant’s conduct. However, he correctly concedes that these arguments are foreclosed by Scarborough v. United States , 431 U.S. 563 (1977) , and United States v. Alcantar , 733 F.3d 143 (5th Cir. 2013) , and he merely raises these issues to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance, or, alternatively, for an extension of time to file a brief. Because summary affirmance is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969 ), the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is **GRANTED** , the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is **DENIED** , and the district court’s judgment is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 23-10081 Document: 00516936006 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2023
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PETER VU, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

SAN FRANCISCO POLICE 

DEPARTMENT; CITY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; 

WILLIAM SCOTT, Officer; as an individual 

in his official capacity as a Police Chief of 

San Francisco Police Department; 

NICHOLAS RAINSFORD, Officer; as an 

individual in his official capacity as an 

officer of San Francisco Police Department; 

ZUROSKI, First name unknown; Officer; as 

an individual in his official capacity as an 

officer of San Francisco Police Department; 

E. ROBERTS, Officer; as an individual in 

his official capacity as an officer of San 

Francisco Police Department, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 21-15619 

D.C. No. 4:20-cv-04579-JSW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

FILED

FEB 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-15619 

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Peter Vu appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a Fourteenth Amendment equal protection violation. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 

2012). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Vu’s action because Vu failed to allege 

facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See Furnace v. Sullivan, 705 F.3d 1021, 

1030 (9th Cir. 2013) (“To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a violation of 

the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment a plaintiff must show 

that the defendants acted with an intent or purpose to discriminate against the 

plaintiff based upon membership in a protected class.” (citation and internal 

quotation marks omitted)); Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) 

(although pro se pleadings are construed liberally, a plaintiff must allege facts 

sufficient to state a plausible claim).

AFFIRMED.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
#### Richard Donald COOPER, Plaintiff, v. Suzanne DANDOY, M.D., Chief Administrative Officer, Dept, of Health, State of Utah, and David L. Wilkinson, Attorney General, State of Utah, and Aleen Eggleston Cooper, Defendants.

No. 20617.

Supreme Court of Utah.

June 5, 1985.

Richard Donald Cooper, pro se.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendants.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff’s petition for extraordinary relief in this matter was denied. Based on the frivolous and unmeritorious nature of the petition, defendant Aleen Eggleston Cooper now seeks reimbursement of her expenses in defending against the petition.

Pursuant to the provisions of Rules 33 and 40 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion is granted, and plaintiff is ordered to pay to defendant Aleen Eggleston Cooper the sum of $600, which represents the reasonable expenses incurred in defending against the petition, including a reasonable attorney fee.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1855 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1855

      To extend the suspension of duty on cyproconazole technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 22, 2009

 Mr. Nelson of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the suspension of duty on cyproconazole technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYPROCONAZOLE TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.59 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to cyproconazole technical) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1921 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on small particle calcium chloride 

phosphor. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. ROBERTS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on small particle 

calcium chloride phosphor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SMALL PARTICLE CALCIUM CHLORIDE PHOS4 PHOR. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.74 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 small particle calcium chloride phosphor) is amended by 

8 striking the date in the effective period column and insert9 ing ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1921 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
World Airways, Inc.:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-13575, No. 333-14461, No. 333-33704, No. 333-33706 and No. 333-14457)
on Form S-8 and registration statements (No. 333-35054, No. 333-46406 and No.
333-113135) on Form S-3 of World Airways, Inc. of our report dated March 5, 2004
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of World Airways, Inc. and
subsidiary as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' deficiency, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which
report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of World
Airways, Inc.

                                          KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia
March 26, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPUTER
MANAGEMENT SCIENCES,  INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                    14,550,323
<SECURITIES>                                               2,805,072
<RECEIVABLES>                                             11,720,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          36,893,274
<PP&E>                                                    18,575,875
<DEPRECIATION>                                             3,077,243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            66,123,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      4,875,435
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                     144,554
<OTHER-SE>                                                60,818,134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              66,123,270
<SALES>                                                   71,162,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          71,162,549
<CGS>                                                     43,342,847
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             43,342,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            12,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           14,938,870
<INCOME-TAX>                                               5,670,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        9,268,870
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                               9,268,870
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0.61



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert S. Cubbin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Robert S. CubbinRobert S. CubbinChief Executive OfficerMarch 16, 2011
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



|I, Joseph B. Leonard, certify that:
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   

|Date: March 12, 2004 |  | By: | /s/  Joseph B. LeonardJoseph B. Leonard
Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1975 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1975

 To suspend temporarily the duty on flavored green tea (not fermented).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on flavored green tea (not fermented).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLAVORED GREEN TEA (NOT FERMENTED).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Flavored green tea  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (not fermented)                                                    31/2011.......
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          0902.10.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
steam

_ record - Fw: Ke y stone ICR Extension Request (2)

-----Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US on 07/02/2010 09:15PM -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Lafontaine, James K" <jlafontaine@rrienergy.com> Date: 06/24/2010 12:59PM cc: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>, "Jacklin, Mark J" <mjacklin@rrienergy.com>, "Berkebile, Rodney J" <rberkeb ile@rrienergy.com> Subject: Keystone ICR Extension Request (2)

Dear Ms. Alicea:

Please see the attached Keys tone ICR Extension Request.

Thank you,

James Lafontaine

General Manager

Keystone Generating Station

724-354-5450 From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. g ov> To: <steam_record@erg.c om>, <jordan.ronald@epa.gov> Date: 7/2/2010 8:16 PM Sub j ect: Fw: Keystone ICR Extension Request (2) Attachments: Ke y stone ICR Extension Request (2).doc Pa g e 1 of 1

3/1/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C2E4918DO

...
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

0615 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

138487 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138487 

 COA: 278746 

St Clair CC: 06-002887-FC 

JOHN DAVID GREER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 5, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1924 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1924

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on compound of barium 
                     magnesium aluminate phosphor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

  Mr. Roberts introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on compound of barium 
                     magnesium aluminate phosphor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPOUND OF BARIUM MAGNESIUM ALUMINATE PHOSPHOR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.64 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to compound of barium magnesium 
aluminate phosphor) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```