alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 - Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
Raven Gold Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering
this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended January 31, 2011 and filed with the U. S. Securities and
Exchange Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Mike Wood
------------------------
    Mike Wood
    Principal Executive Officer
    Principal Financial Officer


Date  March 14, 2011
      --------------


<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.6
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE
LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
  AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT Amendment RFC GMACM Borrower Borrowers Lender
 PRELIMINARY STATEMENTS
 Loan and Security Agreement
     Amendments to the Loan and Security Agreement Section 2




---



##### 



7.01(i)(i) ii
    Notices, Etc.
 Exhibit A
 Exhibit B
  Compliance Certificate Exhibit 7.01 Exhibit 7.01(a)




---



##### 



GMAC Revolver
  Responsible Officer
 Conditions of Effectiveness
   (i)
    
    The representations and warranties contained in
Section 4 hereof are correct on and as of the date of such
certificate as though made on and as of such date; and(ii)
    
    No event has occurred and is continuing that constitutes a Default.
 Reaffirmation of Security Interest
 Representations and Warranties of the Borrower




---



##### 



Reference to and Effect on the Loan Documents




---



##### 



Execution in Counterparts
 Governing Law




---



##### 



GMAC LLC
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    /s/ David WalkerName:
    David WalkerTitle:
    Group VP and Treasurer RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    /s/ Elizabeth T. KellyName:
    Elizabeth T. KellyTitle:
    Asst. Treasurer RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    /s/ Elizabeth T. KellyName:
    Elizabeth T. KellyTitle:
    Asst. Treasurer GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    /s/ Elizabeth T. KellyName:
    Elizabeth T. KellyTitle:
    Asst. Treasurer




---



##### 








---



##### 



FORM OF COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
 
 
 Loan Agreement RFC Borrowers Lender
 Section 7.01(i) Reporting Date
  Section 6.01(j)




---



##### 



 
 RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLCBy:Name:Title: GMAC MORTGAGE, LLCBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



FORM OF COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
 
 
 Loan Agreement RFC GMAC Mortgage Borrowers Lender
 ResCap Exhibits A and B
 Exhibit A
 Exhibit B
  
 RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLCBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



Exhibit A




---



##### 



Exhibit B
# L_2006386EN.01004401.xml

| 29.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 386/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 386/44

---

DECISION OF THE COUNCIL

of 18 December 2006

amending the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Communities as regards the language arrangements

(2006/955/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Article 64 of the Statute of the Court of Justice,

In accordance with the procedure referred to in the second paragraph of Article 245 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and the second paragraph of Article 160 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,

Having regard to the request of the Court of Justice,

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission of 12 December 2006,

Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament of 13 December 2006,

Whereas with the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania, Bulgarian and Romanian will become official languages of the European Union and whereas those languages should be included in those listed in the Rules of Procedure as the languages of a case,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 19 June 1991 (OJ L 176, 4.7.1991, p. 7. Corrigendum: OJ L 383, 29.12.1992, p. 117), as amended on 21 February 1995 (OJ L 44, 28.2.1995, p. 61), 11 March 1997 (OJ L 103, 19.4.1997, p. 1. Corrigendum: OJ L 351, 23.12.1997, p. 72), 16 May 2000 (OJ L 122, 24.5.2000, p. 43), 28 November 2000 (OJ L 322, 19.12.2000, p. 1), 3 April 2001 (OJ L 119, 27.4.2001, p. 1), 17 September 2002 (OJ L 272, 10.10.2002, p. 24. Corrigendum: OJ L 281, 19.10.2002, p. 24), 8 April 2003 (OJ L 147, 14.6.2003, p. 17), 19 April 2004 (OJ L 132, 29.4.2004, p. 2), 20 April 2004 (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 107), 12 July 2005 (OJ L 203, 4.8.2005, p. 19) and 18 October 2005 (OJ L 288, 29.10.2005, p. 51) are hereby amended as follows:

Article 29(1) shall be replaced by the following:

‘1.   The languages of a case shall be Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Irish, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovene, Spanish, or Swedish.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect at the same time as the Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union.

The texts of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice in Bulgarian and Romanian shall be adopted after the entry into force of the Treaty referred to in paragraph 1.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2006.

For the Council

The President

J.-E. ENESTAM

---
Form Approved. O.M.B. No. 2070-0012

Report Number 

EPA

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT OF 

MANUFACTURE OR IMPORT (40CFR§720.102)

Part I - SUBMITTER IDENTIFICATION Document Control #: 

 CBI* 

Company Name

Manufacturer/ 

Importer 

(in U.S.) 

 

Technical Name Telephone Number 

Contact 

(in U.S.) 

Part II - Premanufacture Notice (PMN) "P" Case Number: 

Part III - Check the appropriate box and provide the exact date of manufacture or importation: 

First Commercial Manufacture** First Commercial Importation*** 

Date: Date: 

**Date of commencement is the date of completion of non-exempt manufacture of the first amount (bath, drum, etc.) 

***For importees, the date of commencement is the date that the new chemical substance clears U.S. customs.

Part IV - Manufacturing Plant Site(s) or Importing Site(s): (Importers, provide street address of destination)

Part V - Specific Chemical Identity: (For Consolidated submissions, each substance must have a separate NOC form with the specific 

identity of each chemical substance.) 

Part VI - Generic Chemical Name (if chemical identity is claimed CBI*): 

Part VII - Substance Identity Confidentiality Status: 

I wish to continue to claim the substance identity confidential and the substantiation to support this claim is attached. Failure to submit 

the required substantiation in accordance with 40 CFR 720.85(b) will result in a waiver of your claim. 

I previously claimed the substance identity as confidential and hereby relinquish that claim. 

I did not claim the substance identity as confidential in my original PMN submission. 

You must submit your completed notice no later than 30 calendar days after the first date of commercial manufacture/importation to the address 

shown below: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

OPPT Document Control Office (7407M) 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

ATTN: Notice of Commencement

Signature of authorized official Date 

Note: CBI* - refers to the term "Confidential Business Information". Mark (X) in the box if the information is to be held Confidential. 

EPA Form 7710-56 (6-09)

(first) (last)

City State Zip

(first) (last)

Name of Authorized Official Mailing Address (number and street)

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.8 hours per response. Send comments on 

the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent 

burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the 

completed EPA Form 7710-56 to this address.

NON-CBI SUBMISSION

NOC2009P1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4240

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. HERBERT LEWIS TURNER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:01-cr-30062-sgw)

Submitted: March 18, 2009 Decided: April 15, 2009

Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Craig W. Sampson, BARNES & DIEHL, PC, Chesterfield, Virginia, for Appellant. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Herbert Lewis Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to eighteen months’ imprisonment, followed by an additional eighteen-month term of supervised release. The district court entered judgment on January 18, 2007. Turner filed a notice of appeal on February 20, 2007. 1 Because Turner failed to file a timely notice of appeal, 2 we remanded the case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether Turner had shown excusable neglect or good cause to warrant an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. Despite an order from the district court directing Turner to submit a response explaining the reason he failed to file a timely notice of appeal, Turner filed no explanation. The court accordingly found that Turner failed to demonstrate excusable neglect or good cause. See United States v. Turner ,

1 The envelope in which the notice was mailed was postmarked February 20, 2007. Under the “mailbox rule” of Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988), a document is deemed filed by a prisoner when it is delivered to prison officials for mailing.

2 In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

23 No. 5:01-cr-30062-sgw (W.D. Va. Jan. 13, 2009). The matter is now before this court for final disposition. In light of Turner’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal and the

district court’s reasonable determination that Turner failed to demonstrate excusable neglect or good cause for his late appeal, we dismiss the appeal as untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-107415, Form S-3 No. 333-127590, Form S-8 No. 333-103209, and Form S-8 No. 333-127595) of AirTran Holdings, Inc., and in the related Prospectuses, of our reports dated January 31,2008, with respect to the Consolidated Financial Statements of AirTran Holdings, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of AirTran Holdings, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2007. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Orlando, Florida 

January 31, 2008
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Nord Resources Corporation - Exhibit 10.4






AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CONVERTIBLE 
PROMISSORY
NOTE DATED FOR REFERENCE JUNE 29, 2004

(the “Amended and Restated Convertible Note”)

Effective as of January 15, 2007, the Amended and Restated
Convertible Note dated August 14, 2006, as amended by an amending agreement
dated December 22, 2006, in the principal amount of Thirty-Five Thousand Dollars
($35,000), between Nord Resources Corporation (the “Company”) and Ronald A.
Hirsch (the “Holder”) shall be amended as follows:

Section 1 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with
the following:

“1.         
 Maturity: Unless converted as provided in Section 2, this Note will
automatically mature and be due and payable in cash upon the earlier of:

(a)           
January 31, 2007; and 

(b)           
the closing date of 

(i)            a
registered equity offering and/or a debt project financing (collectively or
separately, a “Funding”) in which the Company raises not less than the aggregate
amount of $25,000,000, or 

(ii)          a
significant corporate transaction (a “Significant Transaction”) in which 

(A)           
any person, together with all affiliates and associates of such person, becomes
the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company
representing 51% or more of the common shares the Company, or 

(B)            there
is a sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of
transactions contemplated or arranged by any party as a single plan) of all or
substantially all of the assets of the Company or of assets of the Company
valued at $12,000,000 or greater

(the “Maturity Date”). Subject to Section 2 below, interest
shall accrue on this Note,”

This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument. Facsimiles containing original
signatures shall be deemed for all purposes to be originally-signed copies of
the documents which are the subject of such facsimiles.

Dated as of January 15, 2007.

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

	COMPANY: 	 	HOLDER: 
	 	 	 	 	 
	NORD RESOURCES CORPORATION 	 	RONALD A. HIRSCH 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 	/s/
      John Perry 		BY: 	/s/ Ronald A. Hirsch





  	Name: 	John Perry 	 	Name: 	Ronald A. Hirsch 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Title: 	Senior
      Vice President & CFO 	 	Address: 	668 N.
      Coast Hwy, #171 
	 	 	 	 	Laguna
      Beach, CA 92561 USA 
	Address: 	1 West
      Wetmore Road, Suite 203 	 	  	
	  	Tucson, Arizona 85705 USA
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of O.J.P., a Child

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00163

- CV

Trial court case number: 2016

- 25857

Trial court: 246th District Court of Harris County

This is an accelerated appeal from an order terminating the parental rights of appellant,

C.D.P. This Court is required to bring the appeal to final disposition within 180 days of March 29, 2021, the date the first notice of appeal was filed, so f ar as reasonably possible. See T EX

. R.

J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2, reprinted in T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. , tit. 2, subtit. F app.

Appellant’s brief was originally due on May 10, 2021. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a)

. Appellant has filed three motions for extensions of time, which we have granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a), (d). After granting appellant’s third motion for extension of time, this Court extend ed the deadline for filing appellant’s brief to July 14, 2021

— sixty

- f ive days past the original due

date

— with no further extensions . Appellant has not filed a brief.

Appellant’s brief is due NO LATER THAN JULY 23, 2021 . No extensions will be granted. If appellant does not file a brief as directed, we may abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court to determine whether appellant wishes to pursue her appeal and whether substitute counsel should be appointed to represent appellant on appeal.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/Julie Countiss

 Acting individually

Date: July 15, 202 1
# L_2006194EN.01002701.xml

| 14.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 194/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 194/27

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1078/2006

of 13 July 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 7 to 13 July 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 July 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
P.1 

OAR Box 1867 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

36) ll-B-90 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 12/2/2008 6:27:21 AM Sheet 36 of 95, 
¥ P.2 

A-90-19 

ll-B-90 

MEMORANDU M 

TO: Process Vents Docket A-90-19 

FROM: Wanda Floyd 

DATE: January 1991 

EPA A'R 

SUBJECT: HON NESHAP: Industry Characterist4es-/Met:hyl"M'ethacrylate 

Attached is a product-process summary (PPS) for the production of Methyl 

Methacrylate via Hydrolysis of Acetone Cyanohydrin category. This PPS was 

developed as part of the Industrial Profile project in support of the 

Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON) regulatory effort. Information in this PPS is 

used as a basis for emissions and cost impact estimates for the HON program. 

Listed below are the key references used in developing the attached PPS. 

"Methyl Methacrylate." In: Mannsville Chemical Products. New York, 

February 1988. 

EPA-450/3-80-028e. Organic Chemical Manufacturing. Volume 10: Selected 

Processes. December 1980. 

1989 Directory of Chemical Producers USA. SRI International, California, 

p. 788. 

"Methyl Methacrylate." In: Chemical Marketing Reporter 

Company, Inc., New York, March 28, 1988. 

White, Howard. 

York, 1986. p. 

Schnell Publishing 

Introduction to Industrial Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, New 

108. 

Chenier, Philip, Jr. Survey of Industrial Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, New 

York, 1986. pp. 181-182. 

"Selecting the Process for Your Next MMA Plant. "In: Hydrocarbon Processing. 

Gulf Publishing Company, Texas, March 1986. pp. 37-43. 

Hie Corcespeuiig <.# ; nss 

Document is Deckel iten 

A-90-19 

ll-B-252 

cao.067 

methyl.met
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Vincent Verdiramo, President of Serino 3, Corp. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  September 14, 2005

/s/ Vincent L. Verdiramo

___________________________



President
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1716 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1716

 To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 to 
 reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2009

 Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Lugar) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 to 
 reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF UNITED STATES ADVISORY COMMISSION ON 
              PUBLIC DIPLOMACY.

    Section 1334 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 
1998 (22 U.S.C. 6553) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2009'' and 
inserting ``October 1, 2010''.
                                 <all>
```