This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or

proposed rules that are applicable to the

public. Notices of hearings and investigations,

committee meetings, agency decisions and

rulings, delegations of authority, filing of

petitions and applications and agency

statements of organization and functions are

examples of documents appearing in this

section.

Notices Federal Register

14493 

Vol. 77, No. 48 

Monday, March 12, 2012 

1See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of the 2009–2010 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 68140 

(November 3, 2011) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 

2See Preliminary Results. 

3The Department rejected the Petitioners’ 

December 8, 2011, surrogate value rebuttal 

comments because it contained new surrogate value 

information. Petitioners removed the material and 

resubmitted the rebuttal comments on December 16, 

2011. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1817] 

Reorganization/Expansion of ForeignTrade Zone 77 Under Alternative Site 

Framework Memphis, Tennessee Area 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Board adopted the 

alternative site framework (ASF) (74 FR 

1170, 01/12/2009; correction 74 FR 

3987, 01/22/2009; 75 FR 71069–71070, 

11/22/2010) as an option for the 

establishment or reorganization of 

general-purpose zones; 

Whereas, the City of Memphis, 

grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 77, 

submitted an application to the Board 

(FTZ Docket 51–2011, filed 08/03/11) 

for authority to reorganize and expand 

under the ASF with a service area of 

Shelby County, Tennessee, within the 

Memphis U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection port of entry, and FTZ 77’s 

existing Site 4 and proposed Site 10 

would be categorized as magnet sites, 

while Sites 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 

12 would be categorized as usage-driven 

sites; 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (76 FR 48121, 08/08/2011) and 

the application has been processed 

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendations of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and the 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal is in the public 

interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 

The application to reorganize and 

expand FTZ 77 under the alternative 

site framework is approved, subject to 

the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, 

including Section 400.28, to the Board’s 

standard 2,000-acre activation limit for 

the overall general-purpose zone 

project, to a five-year ASF sunset 

provision for magnet sites that would 

terminate authority for Site 4 if not 

activated by February 28, 2017, and to 

a three-year ASF sunset provision for 

usage-driven sites that would terminate 

authority for Sites 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 

11 and 12 if no foreign-status 

merchandise is admitted for a bona fide 

customs purpose by February 28, 2015. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of 

February 2012. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 

Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

[FR Doc. 2012–5914 Filed 3–9–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–924] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of the 

2009–2010 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On November 3, 2011, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published the preliminary 

results in the 2009–2010 antidumping 

duty administrative review of 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, 

and strip (‘‘PET film’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 The period 

of review (‘‘POR’’) is November 1, 2009, 

through October 31, 2010. We have 

determined that sales have been made 

below normal value (‘‘NV’’) by certain 

companies subject to this review. We 

invited interested parties to comment on 

our Preliminary Results. Based on our 

analysis of the comments received, we 

made changes to our margin 

calculations for Tianjin Wanhua Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Wanhua’’) and Sichuan Dongfang 

Insulating Material Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Dongfang’’) (collectively, 

‘‘Respondents’’). The final dumping 

margins for this review are listed in the 

‘‘Final Results Margins’’ section below. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 12, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Martin and Jonathan Hill, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 4, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3936, and (202) 

482–3518, respectively. 

Background 

On November 3, 2011, the Department 

published its Preliminary Results in the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

of PET film from the People’s Republic 

of China.2 On November 28, 2011, 

DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi 

Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Inc., and 

Toray Plastics (America), Inc. 

(collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’), Wanhua, 

and Fuwei Films (Shandong) Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Fuwei Films’’) submitted publicly 

available surrogate value (‘‘SV’’) data. 

On December 8, 2011, Petitioners 3, 

Wanhua, Fuwei Films and Dongfang 

submitted rebuttal comments regarding 

the November 28, 2011, submissions. 

We received case briefs from Petitioners, 

Wanhua, Fuwei Films and Shaoxing 

Xiangyu Green Packing Co., Ltd. (jointly 

‘‘Wanhua et al’’), Dongfang, and Bemis 

Company, Inc. (‘‘Bemis’’) on December 

14, 2011, and rebuttal briefs on 

December 21, 2011. On January 12, 2012 

the Department held a public hearing. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this 

review are addressed in the 

Memorandum from Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, 

‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip from the People’s 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES