alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000949240
<NAME>                        World Airways
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollar

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.0
<CASH>                                         25,271
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                   258
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               55,548
<PP&E>                                         65,926
<DEPRECIATION>                                 13,497
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          64,431
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       12
<OTHER-SE>                                     30,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   130,695
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,386
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  226,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,150)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                14,748
<INCOME-TAX>                                   602
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            14,146
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (5,250)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   8,896
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.84


</TABLE>
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 410 Lower Tribunal No. 08

- CF

- 16911

_____________________________
K ENNETH T ERRILL M ITCHELL , J R

. ,

Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County

.

Bruce Kyle , Judge.
February 6, 2024

PER CURIAM

.
AFFIRMED

. SMITH, MIZE and GANNAM , JJ., c oncur.

Matthew R. McLain , of McLain Law, P.A.
, Longwood , for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison C. Heim, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
No, 83291 

FILED 

AUG 1 2 2021 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERK • PREME COURT 

BY 

DEPUTY CLERK. 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TH-E STATE OF NEVADA 

TULY LEPOLO, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK; THE HONORABLE MICHAEL 

VILLANL DISTRICT J LLDG E; AN D TH E 

HONORABLE DAVID BARKER, 

SENIOR JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Real Party in Interest. 

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges district 

court oral decisions denying a motion for bail and a renewed motion for bail. 

It is petitioner's burden to demonstrate that extraordinary 

relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 998, 

88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). As part of petitioner's burden, it was his obligation 

to provide an appendix that includes all records essential to understand the 

issues raised in the petition. See NRAP 21(a)(4); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228-29, 

88 P.3d at 844. This obligation included, at a minimum. contacting real 

party in interest and the district court to facilitate preparation of the court's 

order and, if such an order was not promptly forthcoming, proposing his 

own order for the district court's review. See Rust v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist., 

103 Nev. 686, 689, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987) (explaining that a written 

order is essential to this court's review). Petitioner does not, however. argue 

Soften Couar 

OF 

NEVADA 

10) 1947A 460 
or demonstrate that he made any such attempt to do so, instead merely 

indicating that no written order was entered. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

6-dt c„). 

Hardesty 

J. 

Parraguirre Cadish 

cc: Chiefjudge, The Eighth judicial District Court 

Hon. David Barker, Senior Judge 

Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge 

Special Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

101 1947A 04601e, 

2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.96 MB)

Tags:Defense Supply Center Richmond, DLA Aviation Richmond, Black History Month, Reggie McKenzie

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Frank C. Spencer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cogdell Spencer Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under the Company’s supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report the Company’s conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on the Company’s mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.       Date: August 14, 2006 By: /s/ Frank C. Spencer     Name: Frank C. Spencer    Title: Chief Executive Officer  
25
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARNELL J. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 396 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 2021, the Application to Remand to Trial 

Court is DENIED and the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-10-00778- CV

Vic A. G ardner, Appellant

v. Gr eg Abbott, At torney G eneral of Texas; The State of Texas; and Glenn El liott, Ind ividu ally, App ellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 53RD J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. D-1 -GN-0 9-0 0380 4, H ONO RAB LE O RLINDA NARANJO , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Vic A. Ga rdner has filed a motion to dismiss his appea l, informing this Court that he no longe r wishes to pursue his appea l ag ainst appellee s Gre g Abbott, Attorney Gene ral of Texas; The State of Texas; and Glenn Elliott , I ndividually
. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1).

J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Henson a nd Goodwin Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: January

20, 2011
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Frances M. Conley, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cutter & Buck Inc., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cutter & Buck Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Dated: July 14, 2004 |  |                                                                                            
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/FRANCES M. CONLEYFrances M. Conley Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

58

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harry L. McClam, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.), rendered August 4, 1989, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court’s decision to permit inquiry into one of the defendant’s numerous prior burglary convictions was neither an improvident exercise of discretion nor unduly prejudicial to the defendant *(see, People v Boyd,*156 AD2d 701; *People v Hamlin,*153 AD2d 644; *People v Mercado,*117 AD2d 627; *People v Rahman,*62 AD2d 968, *affd*46 NY2d 882).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of burglary in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant’s recent and exclusive possession of the fruits of the crime justified the inference that he had burglarized the premises in question *(see, People v Baskerville,*60 NY2d 374). There was clearly a reasonable basis upon which the jury could conclude that the explanation provided was false *(see, People v Alvarez,*116 AD2d 725; *People v Thornton,*104 AD2d 426).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LSP-WHITEWATER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AS OF AND FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         101,114
<SECURITIES>                                34,414,528
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,689
<PP&E>                                     149,232,431
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             190,617,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,616,709
<BONDS>                                    177,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               190,617,709
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# L_2006199EN.01000801.xml

| 21.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 199/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 199/8

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1116/2006

of 20 July 2006

prohibiting fishing for anchovy in ICES Sub-area VIII

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 of 22 December 2005 fixing for 2006 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required (1), and in particular Article 5(3) thereof;

Whereas:

| (1) | The Community’s fishing effort for vessels fishing for anchovy in the Bay of Biscay ICES Sub-area VIII (Bay of Biscay) is laid down provisionally in Annex IA to Regulation (EC) No 51/2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Community’s fishing effort for vessels fishing for anchovy in the Bay of Biscay ICES Sub-area VIII (Bay of Biscay) is laid down provisionally in Annex IA to Regulation (EC) No 51/2006.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5(3) of that Regulation the Commission shall immediately stop fishing activities concerning anchovy in ICES Sub-area VIII if STECF advises that the spawning stock biomass at spawning time in 2006 is less than 28 000 tonnes. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5(3) of that Regulation the Commission shall immediately stop fishing activities concerning anchovy in ICES Sub-area VIII if STECF advises that the spawning stock biomass at spawning time in 2006 is less than 28 000 tonnes.

| (3) | STECF has estimated the spawning stock biomass at spawning time in 2006 to 18 640 tonnes. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

STECF has estimated the spawning stock biomass at spawning time in 2006 to 18 640 tonnes.

| (4) | As the anchovy spawning stock biomass at spawning time in 2006 is below the threshold of 28 000 tonnes, the fishery has to be prohibited for the remainder of 2006, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

As the anchovy spawning stock biomass at spawning time in 2006 is below the threshold of 28 000 tonnes, the fishery has to be prohibited for the remainder of 2006,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Fishing for anchovy in the ICES Sub-area VIII shall be prohibited from the date of entry into force fixed by Article 2 until 31 December 2006. In ICES Sub-Area VIII it shall also be prohibited to retain on board, tranship or land anchovy caught after the date of entry into force of this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 July 2006.

For the Commission

Joe BORG

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 16, 20.1.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 941/2006 (OJ L 173, 27.6.2006, p. 1).

1

---
# L_2006120EN.01001401.xml

| 5.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 120/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 120/14

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 691/2006

of 4 May 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 28 April to 4 May 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 May 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 May 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---