14732 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 13, 2012 / Notices 

1See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty Investigation, 76 FR 70960 

(November 16, 2011). 

2See Letter from Petitioner to the Secretary of 

Commerce, ‘‘Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Request to Extend 

Preliminary Determination in Antidumping Duty 

Investigation,’’ dated March 2, 2012. 

3See generally section 733(c)(1)(B) of the Act. 

review, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rates listed above; (2) for previously 

reviewed or investigated companies 

other than those covered by this review, 

the cash deposit rate will be the 

company-specific rate established for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the 

producer is, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established for the most recent 

period for the manufacturer of the 

subject merchandise; and (4) if neither 

the exporter nor the producer is a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the investigation, the cash deposit 

rate will be 3.91 percent, the all-others 

rate established in the less-than-fairvalue investigation. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent increase in antidumping 

duties by the amount of antidumping 

and/or countervailing duties 

reimbursed. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: March 5, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

APPENDIX I 

List of Comments in the Accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum: 

A. General Issue 

Comment 1: Treatment of Negative 

Dumping Margins (Zeroing) 

B. Company Specific Issues 

Comment 2: Whether to use Navneet’s 

Purchase Order Date for its U.S. Sales 

Comment 3: Whether to Recalculate 

Navneet’s Imputed Credit Expenses 

Comment 4: Whether to Adjust Navneet’s 

Cost of Manufacturing 

Comment 5: Treatment of Navneet’s 

Canvassing Expenses as a Direct Selling 

Expense 

Comment 6: Whether to make an Excise 

Tax Adjustment for Navneet 

Comment 7: Whether to Modify Navneet’s 

Cost Calculation Data 

[FR Doc. 2012–6082 Filed 3–12–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–979] 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into 

Modules, From the People’s Republic 

of China: Postponement of Preliminary 

Determination of Antidumping Duty 

Investigation 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: March 13, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Pedersen or Drew Jackson, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 4, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–2769 or (202) 482– 

4406, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Postponement of Preliminary 

Determination 

On November 16, 2011, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published a notice of 

initiation of an antidumping duty 

investigation of crystalline silicon 

photovoltaic cells, whether or not 

assembled into modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China.1 The period 

of investigation is April 1, 2011, through 

September 30, 2011. The notice of 

initiation stated that, unless postponed, 

the Department would issue its 

preliminary determination for this 

investigation no later than 140 days 

after the date of the initiation in 

accordance with section 773(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1). The 

preliminary determination of the 

antidumping duty investigation is 

currently due no later than March 27, 

2012. 

On March 2, 2012, SolarWorld 

Industries America Inc. (‘‘Petitioner’’), 

made a timely request pursuant to 

section 733(c)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.205(b)(2) and (e) for postponement 

of the preliminary determination in this 

investigation.2 Petitioner requested a 30- 

day postponement of the preliminary 

determination in order to provide the 

Department with sufficient time to 

review the questionnaire responses and 

issue appropriate requests for 

clarification and additional information. 

Sections 733(c)(1)(B)(i) and (ii) of the 

Act permit the Department to extend the 

time limits for the preliminary 

determination if it concludes that the 

parties concerned are cooperating and 

determines that the case is 

extraordinarily complicated by reason of 

the number and complexity of the 

transactions to be investigated or 

adjustments to be considered, the 

novelty of issues presented, or the 

number of firms whose activities must 

be investigated, and additional time is 

necessary to make the preliminary 

determination. The Department may 

postpone making the preliminary 

determination under section 

733(c)(1)(B) of the Act until not later 

than the 190th day after the date on 

which the administering authority 

initiates an investigation under section 

732(c) of the Act, or an investigation is 

initiated under section 732(a) of the 

Act.3

The Department has concluded that 

the parties concerned are cooperating 

with the antidumping duty investigation 

and the nature of this case is 

extraordinarily complicated. Since the 

initiation of this investigation, the 

mandatory respondents filed timely, 

extensive questionnaire and 

supplemental questionnaire responses. 

Further, the instant investigation 

involves a technologically sophisticated 

product that is manufactured through a 

complex, multi-stage production 

process using numerous factors of 

production (‘‘FOP’’). Accordingly, the 

methodology employed to report FOP 

data is inherently complex. Moreover, 

additional time is necessary in order to 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 13, 2012 / Notices 14733 

1See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Intent To Rescind Review in Part, 76 

FR 76135 (December 6, 2011) (Preliminary Results). 

2See Letters from Minoo Hatten, Program 

Manager, Office 1, to All Interested Parties dated 

December 22, 2011, January 24, 2012, and February 

2, 2012. 

issue the preliminary determination. For 

the forgoing reasons, the Department 

determines that this investigation in 

extraordinarily complicated within the 

meaning of section 733(c)(1)(B)(i) of the 

Act and that a full extension of the 

preliminary determination is necessary. 

Accordingly, in accordance with 

section 733(c)(1) of the Act, we are fully 

extending the due date for the 

preliminary determination to no later 

than 190 days after the day on which 

the investigation was initiated. Thus the 

new deadline for issuing the 

preliminary determination is May 16, 

2012. 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). 

Dated: March 6, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6023 Filed 3–12–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–900] 

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 13, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jerrold Freeman, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 1, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0180. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 6, 2011, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) 

published in the Federal Register the 

Preliminary Results of the first 

administrative review covering the 

antidumping duty order on diamond 

sawblades and parts thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China for the 

period January 23, 2009, through 

October 31, 2010.1 Subsequent to the 

publication of the Preliminary Results, 

the Department extended the deadlines 

for submission of post-preliminary 

surrogate values, rebuttal comments and 

case briefs.2 The final results of the 

review are currently due no later than 

April 4, 2012. 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to complete the final 

results of an administrative review 

within 120 days after the date on which 

the preliminary results are published. If 

it is not practicable to complete the 

review within these time periods, 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows 

the Department to extend the time limit 

for the final results to a maximum of 

180 days after the date on which the 

preliminary results are published. 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the final results of this 

review within the original time limit 

because of the complexity of issues 

involving the analysis of surrogate value 

data on the record and because of the 

additional extensions we have granted, 

at the request of various parties, to 

review and submit post-preliminary 

surrogate value data, case briefs and 

rebuttal comments. Therefore, we are 

extending the time period for issuing 

the final results of this review by 40 

days until May 14, 2012. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: March 7, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6077 Filed 3–12–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–405–803, A–421–811] 

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From 

Finland and the Netherlands: 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 13, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert James or Angelica Mendoza, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0649 or (202) 482– 

3019, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 26, 2011, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) 

published in the Federal Register the 

initiation of administrative review of the 

antidumping duty orders on, inter alia, 

purified carboxymethylcellulose from 

Finland and the Netherlands covering 

the period July 1, 2010, through June 30, 

2011. See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocation in 

Part, 76 FR 53404 (August 26, 2011). 

The current deadline for the preliminary 

results of these reviews is April 1, 2012. 

Extension of Time Limits for 

Preliminary Results of Review 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

that the Department complete the 

preliminary results of an administrative 

review within 245 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month of an order for 

which a review is requested. However, 

if it is not practicable to complete the 

review within this time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time limit for 

the preliminary results to a maximum of 

365 days after the last day of the 

anniversary month of an order for which 

a review is requested. 

The Department finds it is not 

practicable to complete the preliminary 

results of these reviews within the 

original time frame because the 

Department requires additional time to 

gather and analyze the information 

submitted on the record. Thus, the 

Department finds it is not practicable to 

complete these reviews within the 

original time limit (i.e., April 1, 2012). 

Accordingly, the Department is 

extending the time limit for completion 

of the preliminary results of these 

administrative reviews by 120 days (i.e., 

until July 30, 2012), in accordance with 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(2). We intend to issue 

the final results no later than 120 days 

after publication of the preliminary 

results notice. 

This extension is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the Act. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES