alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.14**

AMENDMENT NO. 2 

TO 

ADVISORY AGREEMENT 

This amendment no. 2 to that certain Advisory Agreement dated as of November 8,2005 (the “Advisory Agreement”) between KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”), is entered asof August 8, 2006 (the “Amendment”). This Amendment supersedes and replaces Amendment No. 1 to the Advisory Agreement dated as of July 18, 2006. Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning set forthin the Advisory Agreement. 

WHEREAS, upon the terms set forth in this Amendment, the Advisor has agreed to advance the Company a portion ofthe Operating Expenses that the Company has incurred through the date hereof and agreed to be repaid this advance only upon the terms set forth below. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

Notwithstanding anything contained in Article 9 of the Advisory Agreement to the contrary, the Advisor hereby agrees to advance funds (the“Advance”) to the Company equal to the cumulative amount of distributions declared by the Company for the period ending October 31, 2006 less the amount of the Company’s funds from operations (as defined by NAREIT) fromJanuary 1, 2006 through October 31, 2006, provided that in no event will the amount of the Advance be more than the cumulative amount of distributions declared by the Company for the period ending October 31, 2006. Advisor furtheragrees that the Company will only be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for the Advance if and to the extent that the Company’s cumulative funds from operations for the period commencing January 1, 2006 through the date of any suchreimbursement exceed the lesser of (i) the cumulative amount of any distributions declared and payable to the Company’s Stockholders as of the date of such reimbursement or (ii) an amount that is equal to a 7.0% cumulative,non-compounded, annual return on Invested Capital for the Company’s Stockholders for the period from July 18, 2006 through the date of such reimbursement. Advisor understands and agrees that no interest shall accrue on the Advance beingmade under this Amendment. 

*Signature page follows.*

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first abovewritten. 

 
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. By: 
/s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.
  Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Chief Executive OfficerKBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC By: Schreiber Real Estate Investments, L.P., a Manager   By: Schreiber Investments, LLC, as general partner    By: 
/s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.
     Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Manager
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2041 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixture of 1,2 Octanediol and 1,2 

Hexanediol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixture of 1,2 

Octanediol and 1,2 Hexanediol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,2 OCTANEDIOL AND 1,2 HEXANEDIOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1,2 Octanediol and 1,2 

Hexanediol (CAS No. 1117– 

86–8) (provided for in subheading 3824.90.92) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2041 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Edward Sellars, Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.), dated April 11, 1989, which denied his motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, we find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his motion for leave to file a late notice of claim *(see,*General Municipal Law § 50-e). The plaintiff offered no excuse for his failure to file a timely notice of claim, or for his 14-month delay in making the instant application *(see, Perry v City of New York,*133 AD2d 692; *Matter of Heather v County of Rensselaer,*88 AD2d 718; *Rodriguez v City of New York,*86 AD2d 533). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1492

STEPHEN KISSI OWUSU,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: January 19, 2016 Decided: February 4, 2016

Before KING, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tamara L. Jezic, YACUB LAW OFFICES, Woodbridge, Virginia, for 

Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant 

Attorney General, Carl McIntyre, Assistant Director, Brooke M. 

Maurer, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Kissi Owusu, a native and citizen of Ghana, 

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider its decision 

upholding the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his motion 

for a continuance and entering an order of removal. We have 

reviewed the administrative record and Owusu’s claims, and find 

them to be without merit. We accordingly find no abuse of 

discretion in the denial of reconsideration, see Narine v. 

Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009), and deny the petition 

for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: 

Owusu (B.I.A. Apr. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# C_2007073EN.01000301.xml

| 30.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4337 — Thales/Alcatel Divisions Transport et Systèmes)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 73/05)

On 7 November 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4337. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4337. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

April 2, 2013

ERRATA

______________________

WILLIAM GRONER,

Claimant

- Appellant,

v.

Eric K. Shinseki, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent

- Appellee.

______________________

2012

- 7072

______________________

D ecided April 1, 2013

Nonprecedential Order

______________________

Please make the following change:

Page 1, correct “ Note: This disposition is nonprecedential ”
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05992

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 05992\05992_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05992\05992_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

05992\05992_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05992\05992_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05992\05992_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05992\05992_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05992\05992_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05992\05992_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05992\Certification Statement_05992.pdf Plant certification statement

x 05992\Supporting Documentation\05922_Sooner Ash Handling Loop.docx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05992\Supporting Documentation\05922_Water Balance (from visio file).doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05992\Supporting Documentation\05992_Aerial Map (from visio file).doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05992\Supporting Documentation\05992_Sooner Fly Ash Diagram.docx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05992\Supporting Documentation\05992_Sooner aerial for epa.vsd Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05992\Supporting Documentation\Sooner waterflow.vsd Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# Jornal Oficial C 210A/25 d

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 210A |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 65.° ano25 de maio de 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 210A

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

65.° ano25 de maio de 2022

---

| Índice | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | Retificações |
| 2022/C 210 A/01 | Retificação de Empresa Comum para uma Europa Circular de Base Biológica (EC CBE) — Publicação de uma vaga para o cargo de diretor-executivo (m/f) (Agente temporário — grau AD 14) — COM(2022) 20077( JO C 206 A de 23.5.2022 ) | 1 |

Índice

Página

Retificações

2022/C 210 A/01

Retificação de Empresa Comum para uma Europa Circular de Base Biológica (EC CBE) — Publicação de uma vaga para o cargo de diretor-executivo (m/f) (Agente temporário — grau AD 14) — COM(2022) 20077( JO C 206 A de 23.5.2022 )

( JO C 206 A de 23.5.2022 )

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

Retificações

| 25.5.2022 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CA 210/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2022

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CA 210/1

---

Retificação de «Empresa Comum para uma Europa Circular de Base Biológica (EC CBE) — Publicação de uma vaga para o cargo de diretor-executivo (m/f) (Agente temporário — grau AD 14) — COM(2022) 20077»

(
  «Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» C 206 A de 23 de maio de 2022
  )

(2022/C 210 A/01)

Na página 5, «Data-limite», primeiro parágrafo:

| em vez de: | «A data-limite para o registo das candidaturas é 13 de junho de 2022, às 12,00 horas, hora de Bruxelas, após o que as inscrições em linha deixam de ser possíveis.», |
| --- | --- |

em vez de:

«A data-limite para o registo das candidaturas é 13 de junho de 2022, às 12,00 horas, hora de Bruxelas, após o que as inscrições em linha deixam de ser possíveis.»,

| deve ler-se: | «A data-limite para o registo das candidaturas é 4 de julho de 2022, às 12,00 horas, hora de Bruxelas, após o que as inscrições em linha deixam de ser possíveis.» |
| --- | --- |

deve ler-se:

deve ler-se:

«A data-limite para o registo das candidaturas é 4 de julho de 2022, às 12,00 horas, hora de Bruxelas, após o que as inscrições em linha deixam de ser possíveis.»

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Stewart, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), rendered April 24, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 11076/88, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and from an amended judgment of the same court, also rendered April 24, 1989, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under Indictment No. 8214/86.

Ordered that the judgment and the amended judgment are affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court improperly admitted into evidence the hearsay statement of the codefendant Benito Ruiz to an undercover police officer. The statement at issue was properly admitted against the defendant pursuant to a recognized exception to the hearsay rule, *i.e.,*as a declaration of a coconspirator made during the course of and in furtherance of a conspiracy *(see, People v Sanders,*56 NY2d 51, 62; *People v Salko,*47 NY2d 230, 237). Although the defendant was not charged with conspiracy, the evidence was admissible since it tended to prove the defendant’s "commission of a substantive crime for which the conspiracy was formed” *(People v Salko, supra,*at 237). Furthermore, the People met their burden of establishing a prima facie case independent of the statement in question that the defendant and the codefendant had conspired to sell cocaine to the undercover police officer *(see, People v Sanders, supra; People v Bisnett,*144 AD2d 567, 570; *People v Claytor,*137 AD2d 760; *see also, People v Comfort,*151 AD2d 1019, 1020). We further conclude that the admission of the statement at issue did not violate the defendant’s right to confrontation *(see, People v Sanders, supra; People v Salko, supra).*The codefendant who absconded subsequent to his arrest, was unavailable and the *878circumstances surrounding his declaration presented sufficient indicia of its reliability *(see, People v Sanders, supra; People v Claytor, supra; see also, People v Comfort, supra).*

The defendant contends that the trial court’s charge on the defendant’s right not to testify went beyond the statutory language *(see,*CPL 300.10 [2]). However, no objection was raised by defense counsel to the charge as given. The issue is therefore unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Autry,*75 NY2d 836; *People v Wilson,*162 AD2d 747) and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6]).

Lastly, we find the defendant’s allegations of prosecutorial misconduct are either unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]) or are without merit *(see, People v Bartolomeo,*126 AD2d 375). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 12.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               1997            1998           1999          2000            2001
                                              -------        -------        -------        -------        --------
<S>                                           <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense including
   amortization of debt issuance costs        $ 6,951        $12,491        $16,447        $20,108        $ 18,278
Interest on rent expense (1)                    1,359          2,463          3,419          3,453           3,564
                                              -------        -------        -------        -------        --------
Total fixed charges                             8,310         14,954         19,866         23,561          21,842

EARNINGS:
Income (loss) before income taxes              30,800         53,757         51,830          6,803         (76,364)
Fixed charges                                   8,310         14,954         19,866         23,561          21,842
                                              -------        -------        -------        -------        --------
Income (loss) before fixed charges             39,110         68,711         71,696         30,364         (54,522)

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                4.7            4.6            3.6            1.3            -2.5
</TABLE>

(1) The Company believes one-third of rent expense represents a reasonable
approximation of the interest factor.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 LEGACY BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Rule 13a  14(a) / 15d-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Legacy Bancorp, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:
    
    November 9, 2006
    
    
    
    /s/ Stephen M. ConleyStephen M. ConleyChief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and
Treasurer
 27
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2123 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2123

   To temporarily suspend duty on continuous action, self-contained, 
   refillable, fan-motor driven, battery-operated, portable personal 
                     device for mosquito repellent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

   Mr. Kohl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To temporarily suspend duty on continuous action, self-contained, 
   refillable, fan-motor driven, battery-operated, portable personal 
                     device for mosquito repellent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONTINUOUS ACTION, SELF-CONTAINED, REFILLABLE, FAN-MOTOR 
              DRIVEN, BATTERY-OPERATED, PORTABLE PERSONAL DEVICE FOR 
              MOSQUITO REPELLENT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Continuous action,  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        self-contained,                                                    31/2011.......
                        refillable, fan-
                        motor driven,
                        battery-operated,
                        portable personal
                        device for
                        mosquito
                        repellents
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8414.59.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```