alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.6**

**FOURTH EXTENSION OFAMENDED AND RENEWED OPTION AGREEMENT**

THIS FOURTH EXTENSION OFTHE AMENDED AND RENEWED OPTION AGREEMENT is entered into as of the 1st day ofJanuary, 2007, by and between The Hearst Corporation (“Hearst”), a Delawarecorporation, and Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. (the “Company”), aDelaware corporation.

**W I T N E S S E T H**

WHEREAS, Hearst and the Company entered into anAmended and Renewed Option Agreement dated as of August 29, 2000 (the “Amendedand Renewed Option Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, Hearst and the Company extended the Amendedand Renewed Option Agreement pursuant to an initial Extension and subsequentSecond Extension of the Amended and Renewed Option Agreement; and

WHEREAS, Hearst and the Company mutually desire to furtherextend the Amended and Renewed Option Agreement as set forth hereinafter;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutualcovenants and agreements contained herein, and other good and valuableconsideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,the Amended and Renewed Option Agreement is hereby amended and extended bysubstituting the date of December 31, 2007 for the date of August 31,2004 in Section 1 of the Amended and Renewed Option Agreement.

Except as expressly set forth herein, all terms andconditions of the Amended and Renewed Option Agreement shall continue in fullforce and effect. Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms shallhave their respective meanings as set forth in the Amended and Renewed OptionAgreement.

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this extension of the Amended andRenewed Agreement as of the date first above written.
| THE HEARST CORPORATION                    |                  | HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION,  INC. |
|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------|
| By:                                       | /s/RONALD J. DOERFLER |                            | By: | /s/ JONATHAN C. MINTZER |
| Name: Ronald J. Doerfler                  |                  | Name:                           | Jonathan C. Mintzer |
| Title*:   Sr.  VP and CFO* |                  | Title:                          | *Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary* |
| Dated:                                    |                  | Dated:                          |   |
|                                           |                       |                                 |  |  |  |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 13996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5597]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-133223-08]
RIN 1545-BI19

Indian Tribal Government Plans; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to a correction of notice of public hearing on an 
advance notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a correction to a notice of public 
hearing on an advance proposed rulemaking (REG-133223-08) that was 
published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, February 29, 2012 (77 
FR 12226) relating to Indian tribal government plans.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations, 
Pamela Kinard at (202) 622-6060, and regarding the submission of public 
comments and the public hearing, Ms. Oluwafunmilayo (Funmi) Taylor, at 
(202) 622-7180 (not toll-free numbers).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The notice of public hearing on an advance notice proposed 
rulemaking (REG-133223-08) that is the subject of this correction is 
under section 414(d) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, REG-133223-08, contains errors that may prove to be 
misleading and are in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the correction to a notice of 
public hearing on an advance proposed rulemaking (REG-133223-08) which 
was the subject of FR. Doc. 2012-4850, is corrected as follows:
    1. On page 12226, column 3, in the preamble, under the caption 
SUMMARY:, line three, the language ``proposed rulemaking (REG-133233-
08)'' is corrected to read ``proposed rulemaking (REG-133223-08)''
    2. On page 12226, column 3, in the preamble, under the paragraph 
heading ``Background'', line three, the language ``(REG-133233-08) that 
is the subject of'' is corrected to read ``REG-133223-08) that is the 
subject of''.
    3. On page 12226, column 3, in the preamble, under the paragraph 
heading ``Correction of Publication'', line three, the language 
``proposed rulemaking (REG-133233-08)'' is corrected to read ``proposed 
rulemaking (REG-133223-08)''.

LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2012-5597 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1650 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to improve 

the purchase and processing of healthful commodities for use in school 

meal programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2009 

Mrs. LINCOLN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to improve the purchase and processing of healthful 

commodities for use in school meal programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Healthy Food for 

5 Healthy Schools Act of 2009’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1650 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROCUREMENT AND PROCESSING OF FOOD SERV2 ICE PRODUCTS AND COMMODITIES. 

3 Section 9(a)(4) of the Richard B. Russell National 

4 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(a)(4)) is amended by 

5 adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(C) PROCUREMENT AND PROCESSING OF

7 FOOD SERVICE PRODUCTS AND COMMOD8 ITIES.—The Secretary shall— 

9 ‘‘(i) identify, develop, and disseminate 

10 to State departments of agriculture and 

11 education, school food authorities, local 

12 educational agencies, and local processing 

13 entities, model product specifications and 

14 practices for foods offered in school nutri15 tion programs under this Act and the 

16 Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 

17 1771 et seq.) to ensure that the foods re18 flect the most recent Dietary Guidelines 

19 for Americans; 

20 ‘‘(ii) not later than 1 year after the 

21 date of enactment of this subparagraph— 

22 ‘‘(I) carry out a study to analyze 

23 the quantity and quality of nutritional 

24 information available to school food 

25 authorities about food service prod26 ucts and commodities; and 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1650 IS

1 ‘‘(II) submit to Congress a report 

2 on the results of the study that con3 tains such legislative recommendations 

4 as the Secretary considers necessary 

5 to ensure that school food authorities 

6 have access to the nutritional informa7 tion needed for menu planning and 

8 compliance assessments; and 

9 ‘‘(iii) to the maximum extent prac10 ticable, in purchasing and processing com11 modities for use in school nutrition pro12 grams under this Act and the Child Nutri13 tion Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.), 

14 purchase the widest variety of healthful 

15 foods that reflect the most recent Dietary 

16 Guidelines for Americans.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
# C_2006298EN.01000701.xml

| 8.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/7

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 28 November 2006

replacing a member and an alternate member of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

(2006/C 298/04)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1365/75 of 26 May 1975 on the creation of a European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | In its Decision of 13 December 2004 (2) the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the period ending 18 October 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In its Decision of 13 December 2004 (2) the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the period ending 18 October 2007.

2

| (2) | A member's seat and an alternate member's seat on the Governing Board of the aforementioned Foundation in the government representatives category have fallen vacant following the resignations of Mr Marc BOISNEL and Mr Emmanuel GERAT. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat and an alternate member's seat on the Governing Board of the aforementioned Foundation in the government representatives category have fallen vacant following the resignations of Mr Marc BOISNEL and Mr Emmanuel GERAT.

| (3) | The French Government has nominated candidates for the vacant seats, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The French Government has nominated candidates for the vacant seats,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

1.   Ms Mireille JARRY is hereby appointed as a member of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions in place of Mr Marc BOISNEL for the remainder of the term of office, which ends on 18 October 2007.

2.   Mr Robert PICCOLI is hereby appointed as an alternate member of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions in place of Mr Emmanuel GERAT for the remainder of the term of office, which ends on 18 October 2007.

Done at Brussels, 28 November 2006.

For the Council

The President

E. HEINÄLUOMA

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 30.5.1975, p. 1, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1111/2005, OJ L 184, 15.7.2005, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 317, 22.12.2004, p. 4.

2

---
exv10w2



 





EXHIBIT 10.2




Text of Amendment to Certain Stock Option Agreements of George Samenuk




Mr. Samenuk’s agreements are amended to add the following at the end of each such agreement:




     “Extension of Post-Termination Exercise Period. Notwithstanding any provision herein or the
Plan to the contrary, the vested portion of the Option shall remain exercisable for thirty (30)
calendar days following January 7, 2007; provided, however, that in no event may the Option be
exercised later than the earlier of the expiration of the term of the Option as set forth herein
and/or the applicable grant notice.”
#### Edgar S. WILBOURN, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James C. HAGAN; Hagan Engineering, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 85CA0822.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Feb. 6, 1986.

Randall W.B. Purvis, Colorado Springs, for plaintiff-appellant.

Stephen J. Sletta, P.C., Stephen J. Sletta, Colorado Springs, Lucero & Kadinger, P.C., Richard A. Kadinger, Helen Sigmond, Ala-mosa, for defendants-appellees.

PIERCE, Judge.

Plaintiff, Edgar S. Wilbourn III, filed this appeal from an order granting defendants’ motion to quash service and dismiss without prejudice. This court, on its own motion, issued an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of a final, appealable judgment, and both parties have responded. We conclude that the trial court’s order is final for purposes of appeal and therefore discharge the order to show cause.

In determining whether an order is final for purposes of appeal, attention is given to the legal effect of the order rather than its form. *Levine v. Empire Savings & Loan Ass’n,*192 Colo. 188, 557 P.2d 386 (1976). If the order finally disposes of the action and effectively prevents further proceedings, it is a final judgment for purposes of appeal. *Levine v. Empire Savings & Loan Ass’n, supra.*

The dismissal of a complaint without prejudice is generally not a final, ap-pealable order. *B.C. Investment Co. v. Throm,*650 P.2d 1333 (Colo.App.1982). However, if the circumstances of the case reveal that the action cannot be saved by amendment of the complaint, such dismissal is an appealable final order. *Carter v. Small Business Administration,*40 Colo. App. 271, 573 P.2d 564 (1977).

Here, the order of dismissal was based on the trial court’s determination that plaintiff could not properly invoke Colorado’s long-arm statute, § 13-1-124, C.R.S. Under these circumstances, we conclude that the order constituted a final determination that defendants were not *486subject to the court’s jurisdiction. Thus, the order disposed of the action and prevented further proceedings as effectively as would a final judgment of dismissal. It is therefore a final order for purposes of appeal. *See Cyr v. District Court,*685 P.2d 769 (Colo.1984).

The order to show cause is discharged and the parties are ordered to proceed with the filing of the record and briefs in accordance with C.A.R. 11 and 31.

BERMAN and STERNBERG, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION

1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE AS

ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Cadence) for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of Cadence, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cadence.

The undersigned have executed this Certification effective as of August 7, 2008.



/s/ THEODORE R. SCHROEDERTheodore R. SchroederPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)




/s/ WILLIAM R. LARUEWilliam R. LaRueSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cadence, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cadence and will be retained by Cadence and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000948218
<NAME> MINN-DAK FARMER'S COOP

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,504,566
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,744,610
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                     33,389,009
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,558,202
<PP&E>                                         172,032,301
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,281,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,001,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,323,766
<BONDS>                                         10,495,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                     18,483,200
<COMMON>                                           121,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,731,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,001,208
<SALES>                                        170,151,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,697,438
<CGS>                                           71,476,228
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,476,228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,418,727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,198,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    316,097
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                316,097
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       316,097
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
#### MARK RICHARD *v.*OLSEN TEMPORARY SERVICES ET AL.

*James K. Smith,*in support of the petition.

Decided April 15, 1998

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 939 (AC 17271), is denied.
# L_2006275EN.01004701.xml

| 6.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 275/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 275/47

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1476/2006

of 5 October 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 958/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 5 October 2006, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 5 October 2006, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 5 October 2006, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 shall be 33,750 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 6 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 October 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 49.

2

---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2087 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain power panels specifically designed 

for wind turbine generators to transfer electric power to and from a 

utility power grid at 2100 kW at 600 volts with a nominal full load 

of 2190 amps. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain power panels 

specifically designed for wind turbine generators to transfer electric power to and from a utility power grid at 

2100 kW at 600 volts with a nominal full load of 2190 

amps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2087 IS

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN POWER PANELS SPECIFICALLY DE2 SIGNED FOR WIND TURBINE GENERATORS 

3 TO TRANSFER ELECTRIC POWER TO AND 

4 FROM A UTILITY POWER GRID AT 2100 KW AT 

5 600 VOLTS WITH A NOMINAL FULL LOAD OF 

6 2190 AMPS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

9 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

10 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Power panels specifically designed for wind turbine generators in excess of 2 MW; 

such panels designed to 

transfer electric power to and 

from a utility power grid at 

2100 kW at 600 volts with a 

nominal full load of 2190 

amps; with dimensions of 

2350–2450 mm (length) x 

550–650 mm (width) x 

2200–2350 mm (height); and 

with a display system that 

monitors at a minimum wind 

speed, yaw position, and 

blade pitch angle (provided 

for in subheading 

8537.10.90) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

13 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

14 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS