alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

13179 

Federal Register 

Vol. 77, No. 43 

Monday, March 5, 2012 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of March 2, 2012 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the 

Situation in Zimbabwe 

On March 6, 2003, by Executive Order 13288, the President declared a 

national emergency and blocked the property of persons undermining democratic processes or institutions in Zimbabwe, pursuant to the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706). He took this action 

to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy 

of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of certain members of the Government of Zimbabwe and other persons to undermine 

Zimbabwe’s democratic processes or institutions. These actions and policies 

have contributed to the deliberate breakdown in the rule of law in Zimbabwe, 

to politically motivated violence and intimidation in that country, and to 

political and economic instability in the southern African region. 

On November 22, 2005, the President issued Executive Order 13391 to 

take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in 

Executive Order 13288 by ordering the blocking of the property of additional 

persons undermining democratic processes or institutions in Zimbabwe. 

On July 25, 2008, the President issued Executive Order 13469, which expanded the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 

13288 and ordered the blocking of the property of additional persons undermining democratic processes or institutions in Zimbabwe. 

Because the actions and policies of these persons continue to pose an 

unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States, 

the national emergency declared on March 6, 2003, and the measures adopted 

on that date, on November 22, 2005, and on July 25, 2008, to deal with 

that emergency, must continue in effect beyond March 6, 2012. Therefore, 

in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 

U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with 

respect to the actions and policies of certain members of the Government 

of Zimbabwe and other persons to undermine Zimbabwe’s democratic processes or institutions. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PRES DOC
13180 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2012 / Presidential Documents 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

March 2, 2012. 

[FR Doc. 2012–5509 

Filed 3–2–12; 2:15 pm] 

Billing code 3295–F2–P 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PRES DOCOB#1.EPS</GPH>
From: Raymond, Gabrielle [ mailto:graymond@rti.org ]

Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 12:08 PM

To: Rosenthal, Steven < rosenthal.steven@epa.gov >; Mulrine, Phil < Mulrine.Phil@epa.gov >

Cc: Munoz, Breda < breda@rti.org >; Hakos, Matthew < mhakos@rti.org >; Parker, Barrett < Parker.Barrett@epa.gov >;

D'Agostino, Kathleen < dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov >; Liljegren, Jennifer < Liljegren.Jennifer@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: Taconite UPL section review and UPL questions

Hi,

For the data sets being collected, months’ worth of hourly CEMS with n in the thousands, the non

‐ parametric equation is

the best approach to use. As an example, we determined that the Line 7 Solid Fuel data (n>18,000) was not normal

distributed using several tests (kurtosis, skewness, proUCL, Anderson Darling). For data sets that large in size the

likelihood of detecting non

‐ normality or non

‐ lognormality increases. In addition, since the calculation of any high

percentile is possible without the need of interpolation and as a result the non

‐ parametric equation is the most

appropriate for very large data sets.

For the March 3 email

‐ They should use the 720

‐ average values to set the non

‐ parametric limit if they are using 720

‐ average values to meet

compliance.

This is stated in the revised write

‐ up UPL Section

‐ Revised 3

‐ 4_rev3.15.16.docx

‐ The data format to set a limit should match the data format for compliance.

This is stated in the revised write

‐ up UPL Section

‐ Revised 3

‐ 4_rev3.15.16.docx

‐ We also do not agree with their statement about removing high values.

“By contrast, if the non

‐ parametric equation uses individual hourly data to set the standard, the highest 5% are the

peaks in the hourly data set. The limit is established by excluding the highest 5% of those hourly peaks.”

They are truncating the distribution to remove the high values.

The revised write

‐ up UPL Section

‐ Revised 3

‐ 4_rev3.15.16.docx instructs to use the 720

‐ hour averages not the hourly

data for the non

‐ parametric equation to match the format of the data used for compliance. If outlier testing can be

done, in addition to other lines of evidence (professional experience), to establish that certain hourly data points should

be removed from a data set, then that is more reasonable then arbitrarily removing a top 5%.

Gabrielle Raymond

RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Road

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541

‐ 7015
### THE STATE

# o~LASKA.,\ Deparanent Transportation Public Facilities

GOVERNOR SEAN PARN

November 8, 2012

Mr. Dennis 

### J. DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviationAnalysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 .'.: t {

Re: Essential Air Service at Gulkana, May Creek, and McCarthy, Alaska DOCKET DOT-OST-1995-492 Dear Mr. DeVany, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER
P.O. Box 196900 Anchorage. Alaska 99519-6900 Main: 907.269.0730

Fax: 907.269.0489

Thank you for the opportunity to comment onthe selection ofan air carrier for service at Gulkana, May Creek, and McCarthy, Alaska. I am writing to express my strong support for the continuation ofthe Essential Air Service (EAS) program in Alaska and to emphasize the crucial access it provides to ourremote communities. Due to the isolated location ofthese communities, EAS provides their only form ofscheduled transportation, andthey depend on scheduled air service for freight, passenger, medevac, access to hospital services, and mail service for basic necessities and economic welfare. While Gulkana is 190 miles and McCarthy is 305 miles from Anchorage by two-lane road, May Creek is not connected to the road system at all. The State ofAlaskacontinues to assert that the local residents are generally bestpositionedto comment onparticular schedules or air carriers, and therefore we thinkthe community should provide comments to you onthose specific areas. I respectfully urge US DOTto support and continue the EAS service for Gulkana, May Creek, and McCarthy, Alaska. Sincerely,

Steven D. Hatter Deputy Commissioner- Aviation

"GetAlaskaMoving through service and inji·astructure."
#### In the Matter of Grenvil Realty Corp., Appellant, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered April 17, 1990, which denied and dismissed petitioner’s application to annul respondent’s denial of its petition for administrative review, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner challenges respondent’s determination which affirmed the District Rent Administrator’s ("DRA”) determination that petitioner overcharged a tenant by improperly applying two, instead of one, rent guideline increases within a one year guideline period, and that the petitioner also improperly charged the tenant for an additional occupant in the apartment.

Our review of an administrative agency’s finding is limited to whether the finding was rationally based. *(Matter of Plaza Mgt. Co. v City Rent Agency,*48 AD2d 129, *affd*37 NY2d 837.) Pursuant to Rent Guidelines Board Order No. 11, it was clearly not irrational for the DRA to conclude that only one rent guideline increase is permitted within a guideline period even if the prior tenant vacates and more than one new lease is executed in the one year guideline period. As to the charge for the additional occupant, there were no specific guideline increases permitted for such a situation at the time the instant tenancy took effect.

Finally, while petitioner urges that respondent’s failure to compensate petitioner for allowing an additional occupant constitutes an unconstitutional "taking”, petitioner has not met the "heavy burden of overcoming the presumption of constitutionality” that attaches to the rent laws, *(de St. Aubin v Flacke,*68 NY2d 66, 76.)

We have considered all other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Section 906 Certification

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of NCI, Inc. (the Company)
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, to
the best of her knowledge and belief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                                                
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 2, 2007 |  | /s/ JUDITH L. BJORNAAS                                                         
|                       |  | Judith L. Bjornaas                                                             
|                       |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NCI, Inc. and will be
retained by NCI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









I, Peter Toscano, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Operating Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of International Power Group, Ltd. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  May 19, 2006.







|                                                                                              | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                                             
|/s/Peter Toscano                                                                              | 
|Peter Toscano                                                                                 | 
|(Chief Executive Officer, Principal Operating Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors) | 
|                                                                                              |
From: Charles Ball [mailto:CBall@emissionsandsilencers.com]

Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 5:28 PM To: nelson.brad@ecrweb.com Subject: General Silencer/Converter info

Brad, here is some general info on EST oxidation silencer/converters.

"Affordable and efficient emission reduction solutions" www.emissionsandsilencers.com

Charles Ball Engineering Manager cball@emissionsandsilencers.com 20322 Hufsmith-Kohrville Rd. Tomball, TX 77375 Office: 832-559-6505 Cell: 313-920-5099
# L_2006170EN.01002501.xml

| 23.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 170/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 170/25

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 933/2006

of 22 June 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 16 to 22 June 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 June 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 15.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2188 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on poly(toluene diisocyanate) 

dissolved in organic solvents. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on poly(toluene 

diisocyanate) dissolved in organic solvents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLY(TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE) DISSOLVED IN 

4 ORGANIC SOLVENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.04 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 poly(toluene diisocyanate) dissolved in organic solvents) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2011’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2188 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit32.1**

**WrittenStatement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant toSection 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350)**

The undersigned, the ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Emergency Medical ServicesCorporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), each hereby certifiesthat, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)                  the Form 10-Q of the Company for thefiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, filed on the date hereof with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(b)                 the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ William A. Sanger                          |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   | William A. Sanger                              |
|   | Chief Executive Officer  November 7, 2006 |
|   |                                           |
|   | /s/ Randel G. Owen                             |
|   | Randel G. Owen                                 |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                        |
|   | November 7, 2006                          |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5005]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-1137-000]


Entra Energy LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Entra Energy LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is March 14, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b6d6e796864454742454e785e5b5b44595f6b4d4e5948054c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5f3f0e7f6fadbd9dcdbd0e6c0c5c5dac7c1f5d3d0c7d69bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: February 23, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5005 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Rahim Rayani, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Force Energy Corp. (the Company) hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      quarter ended February 28, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                        

|Dated: April 20, 2009 | /s/
      Rahim Rayani                                   
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                      | Rahim Rayani                                             
|                      | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer
|                      | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Accounting 
|                      | Officer and Principal Financial Officer)                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Force Energy
Corp. and will be retained by Force Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---