alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007011EN.01000201.xml

| 17.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3786 — BPI/Euler Hermes/COSEC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 11/02)

On 29 March 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M3786. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M3786. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1413 

To amend the Adams National Historical Park Act of 1998 to include 

the Quincy Homestead within the boundary of the Adams National 

Historical Park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 8, 2009 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Adams National Historical Park Act of 1998 

to include the Quincy Homestead within the boundary 

of the Adams National Historical Park, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Adams National Historical Park Boundary Addition Act 

6 of 2009’’. 

7 (b) FINDING.—The Quincy Homestead has been des8 ignated a National Historic Landmark. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1413 IS

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION TO ADAMS NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK. 

2 Section 4(b) of the Adams National Historical Park 

3 Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 410eee–2(b)) is amended— 

4 (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para5 graph (3); and 

6 (2) by adding after paragraph (1) the following 

7 new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(2) The property at 34 Butler Road in Quin9 cy, Massachusetts, known as the Quincy Homestead 

10 and carriage shed, consisting of approximately 1.8 

11 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled 

12 ‘Boundary Addition Adams National Historical 

13 Park’, numbered N.E.R.R.D. 386/80,001, and dated 

14 August, 2003.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1717 

To authorize major medical facility leases for the Department of Veterans 

Affairs for fiscal year 2010, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2009 

Mr. AKAKA (for himself and Mr. BURR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To authorize major medical facility leases for the Department 

of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2010, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF FISCAL YEAR 2010 MAJOR 

4 MEDICAL FACILITY LEASES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

6 may carry out the following fiscal year 2010 major med7 ical facility leases at the locations specified, in an amount 

8 not to exceed the amount shown for that location: 

9 (1) Anderson, South Carolina, Outpatient Clin10 ic, in an amount not to exceed $4,774,000. 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1717 CPS

1 (2) Atlanta, Georgia, Specialty Care Clinic, in 

2 an amount not to exceed $5,172,000. 

3 (3) Bakersfield, California, Community Based 

4 Outpatient Clinic, in an amount not to exceed 

5 $3,464,000. 

6 (4) Birmingham, Alabama, Annex Clinic and 

7 Parking Garage, in an amount not to exceed 

8 $6,279,000. 

9 (5) Butler, Pennsylvania, Health Care Center, 

10 in an amount not to exceed $16,482,000. 

11 (6) Charlotte, North Carolina, Health Care 

12 Center, in an amount not to exceed $30,457,000. 

13 (7) Fayetteville, North Carolina, Health Care 

14 Center, in an amount not to exceed $23,487,000. 

15 (8) Huntsville, Alabama, Outpatient Clinic Ex16 pansion, in an amount not to exceed $4,374,000. 

17 (9) Kansas City, Kansas, Community Based 

18 Outpatient Clinic, in an amount not to exceed 

19 $4,418,000. 

20 (10) Loma Linda, California, Health Care Cen21 ter, in an amount not to exceed $31,154,000. 

22 (11) McAllen, Texas, Outpatient Clinic, in an 

23 amount not to exceed $4,444,000. 

24 (12) Monterey, California, Health Care Center, 

25 in an amount not to exceed $11,628,000. 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1717 CPS

1 (13) Montgomery, Alabama, Health Care Cen2 ter, in an amount not to exceed $9,943,000. 

3 (14) Tallahassee, Florida, Outpatient Clinic, in 

4 an amount not to exceed $13,165,000. 

5 (15) Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Health 

6 Care Center, in an amount not to exceed 

7 $26,986,000. 

8 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

9 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Veterans 

10 Affairs for fiscal year 2010 or the year in which funds 

11 are appropriated for the Medical Facilities account 

12 $196,227,000 for the leases authorized in subsection (a). 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 92-8111

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ELENA HERNANDEZ, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 22, 1992)

Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Elena Hernandez was charged with conspiracy to possess

marijuana with intent to distribute and possession of marijuana

with intent to distribute after marijuana was found in her car

during a search at a permanent border patrol checkpoint. Her

motion to suppress was denied, and she entered a conditional

guilty plea to count two of the indictment, reserving her right

to appeal the denial of the motion to suppress. She was

sentenced to 33 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised

release.

Hernandez argues that her initial detention at secondary and

the exterior canine search of her car were unconstitutional. The

determination that a search or seizure did not violate the fourth
No. 92-8111

-2-

amendment is a question of law reviewed de novo. U.S. v.

Martinez-Perez, 941 F.2d 295, 297 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied,

112 S.Ct. 1295 (1992).

"[S]tops for brief questioning routinely conducted at

permanent checkpoints are consistent with the Fourth Amendment

and need not be authorized by warrant." U.S. v. Martinez-Fuerte,

428 U.S. 543, 566, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1976). Border

patrol agents may stop motorists, question them about their

citizenship, and selectively refer them to secondary without

individualized suspicion. Id. at 562-63. Agents may also make

referrals to conduct inquiries about controlled substances. See

U.S. v. Dovali-Avila, 895 F.2d 206, 207 (5th Cir. 1990). 

Border patrol agents, however, may not conduct a warrantless

search of the referred vehicle without consent or probable cause. 

Dovali-Avila, 895 F.2d at 207. A canine "sniff" of the exterior

of a car does not constitute a search within the fourth

amendment. Dovali-Avila, 895 F.2d at 207-80; U.S. v. GonzalezBasulto, 898 F.2d 1011, 1013 (5th cir. 1990).

Border Patrol Agent Arzate properly referred Hernandez's car

to secondary and conducted a canine "sniff." Once the dog

alerted Arzate had probable cause to search the car and legally

discovered the marijuana. Gonzalez-Basulto, 898 F.2d at 1013. 

The district court properly denied the motion to suppress.

 AFFIRMED.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXA

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

5/29/2015 COA Case No. 

PULLINS, TIMOTHY DEWAYNE Tr. Ct. No. 007-0509-13 

On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant's Pro Se motion 

of time in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. Th

petition has been extended to Tuesday, August 04, 2015. 

EXTENSIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition F

Review must be filed with The Court of Criminal Appeals.

A

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
#### JOSEPH K. MIMMS *v.*DARIEN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.

*Charles D. Ray,*in support of the petition.

Decided April 28, 1998

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 903 (AC 16769), is denied.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 30330

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Willie James Cook,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:21

- CV

- 1010 USDC No. 3:19

- CR

- 174

- 1

Before **Elrod, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** * Willie James Cook, federal prisoner # 21194

- 035, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his sentence for possessing a firearm as a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)

. In his § 2255 motion, Cook contended that

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 28, 2022 Lyle W. Cayc e Clerk Case: 21-30330 Document: 00516256338 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2022No. 21

- 30330

2 he received ineffective assistance when his counsel failed to advocate for a reduced sentence based on time that he served in state custody for an offense related to his § 922(g) offense. The district court dis missed the § 2255 motion as untimely and, alternatively, on the merits. Cook also appeals the district court’s d ismissal without prejudice of his motion to modify his

sentence , which is construed as arising under 28 U.S.C. § 2241

. Because Cook fails to challenge the district court’s denial of his § 2255 motion as time barred, he has abandoned the issue

. See Hughes v. Johnson , 191 F.3d 607, 613 (5th Cir. 1999)

. Cook has thus not “ made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right ,” 28 U. S.C. § 2253(c)(2), or shown “ that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000 )

. It is unnecessary to address the merits of his claims. See Houser v. Dretke , 395 F.3d 560, 561

- 62 (5th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, a COA is
**DENIED**

**.** The district court dismissed Cook’s § 2241 petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction because Cook fail ed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Cook does not argue that he exhausted administrative remedies; he instead argues that the exhaustion requirement is not jurisdictional. His argument is unavailing. See Pierce v. Holder , 614 F.3d 158, 160 (5th Cir. 2010). Even if Cook was correct in his assertion, because Cook was incarcerated in the federal prison in Beaumont, Texas when he filed his § 2241 petition in the Western District of Louisiana, the district court nevertheless lacked jurisdiction to entertain the petition. See United States v. Brown , 753 F.2d 455, 456 (5th Cir. 1985)

. Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal of Cook’s § 2241 petition without prejudice is **AFFIRMED.** Cook’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is **DENIED**

**.** Case: 21-30330 Document: 00516256338 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/28/2022
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2027 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2027

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Frescolat MGA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Frescolat MGA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FRESCOLAT MGA.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Menthone Glycerin   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          Acetal (CAS No.                                                    31/2011.......
                          63187-91-7)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2932.99.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State,

v.

CRISPEN HANSON,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00205-CR

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20120D03212)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until January 6, 2016. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza, the State’s attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before January 6, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of November, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Coates International, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2004, I, George J. Coates, Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge, that the Company's Amendment No. 1 to
Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  January 27, 2006               COATES INTERNATIONAL, LTD.

                                       By: /s/ George J. Coates
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Principal Accounting Officer

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                         EXHIBIT 10.3 (b)


           SECOND AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT



     REFERENCE IS MADE to that certain Non-Qualified Stock Option
Agreement (the "Agreement"), made effective as of the 13th Day of
November, 1995 and first amended on December 6, 1996, between
Transderm Laboratories Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company") and the undersigned executive officer (the
"Optionee").

     The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

     A.   The Exercise Price is $.15 per share.

     B.   The Company and the Optionee agree that no additional
          options to purchase the Company's common stock will be
          issued to the Optionee during the term of the Option.

     C.   The Optionee will not exercise the Option before April
          4, 2000, unless there is a transaction in which the
          Company is acquired, in which case the number of Option
          Shares as to which the Option is exercisable will be
          limited to twenty (20%) percent of the total number of
          Option Shares for each year that has passed since April
          4, 1995, with part years to be pro-rated temporally.

     D.   All other terms, conditions and provisions of the
          Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed in their
          entirety.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Second Amendment to the aforementioned Stock Option Agreement to
be executed as of November 19, 1998.

                              Transderm Laboratories Corporation

                              By:   /s/ Murray Lieber
                              Title:   Vice President

                              Optionee:

                              By:  /s/ Marvin M. Speiser
                              Marvin M. Speiser
Exhibit 32

AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AirTran Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on January xx, 2007 (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, each hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AirTran Holdings, Inc.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                      
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: January 31, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert L. Fornaro                                                
|                       |  |     |  | Robert L. Fornaro                                                    
|                       |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                                
|                       |  |    
|Date: January 31, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Stanley J. Gadek                                                 
|                       |  |     |  | Stanley J. Gadek                                                     
|                       |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2006209EN.01001301.xml

| 31.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4255 — Evraz/Strategic Minerals)

(2006/C 209/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 August 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4255. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4255. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---