alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Exhibit 10.8

Amendment to Employment Agreement of
Walter E. Standish, III with the Company dated December 29, 2005.

---

# Exhibit 10.8

Beach First National
Bancshares, Inc.Amendment A

Amendment to employment contract
dated February 24, 2004 by and between Beach First National Bancshares, Inc. and Walt
Standish is hereby amended to read:

Current:

| | 5 | Section 5 Bonus: The Executive will receive a minimum of five (5%) percent cash bonus,
with the discretion of the executive committee by March 1 annually, of the net pre-tax
income of the Bank for the prior year. As used in this Section net pre-tax
income shall mean income computed according to generally accepted accounting
principles for Beach First National Bancshares, Inc.
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended:

| | 5 | Section 5 Bonus: The Executive will receive a minimum of five (5%) percent cash bonus,
with the discretion of the executive committee by March 1 annually, of the net pre-tax
income of Beach First National Bancshares, Inc. for the prior year. As used
in this Section net pre-tax income shall mean income computed according to
generally accepted accounting principles for Beach First National Bancshares, Inc.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Company and the Executive have caused this instrument to be executed on
the date December 29, 2005.

|                     | 
|-------------------- | 
|                     | 
|                     | 
|Witnesses:           | 
|                     | 
|/s/ Sarah M. Johnson | 
|Sarah M. Johnson     | 
|                     | 
|                     | 
|                     | 
|                     | 
|                     | 
|                     | 
|/s/ Sarah M. Johnson | 
|                     | 
|Sarah M. Johnson     | 
|                     | 
|                     | 
|                     | 
|                     | 
|                     | 
|/s/ Sarah M. Johnson | 
|                     | 
|Sarah M. Johnson     |
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS MI 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

^^^-^IVED 

In the Matter of Harrison Yacht Sales, Inc. 

2009EA700446 

CP10EA0006 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

vG 

CO 

V 

7 7 

U J 

sm 

' JCKET 

--'S^za 

m-wrn 5^5 

ooo 

CO 

•4a -

COMPLAINANT'S RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF PREHEARING CONFERENCE 

COMES NOW the Complainant, by and through its designated representative, the 

Regional Counsel for the Eastern Region and her designated and authorized agents, and 

responds to Chief Administrative Law Judge Ronnie Yoder's October 12, 2010, Notice of 

Prehearing Conference. 

In his Order, Judge Yoder ordered the parties to provide to him all documents that 

have been exchanged and that have not already been provided to him. 

No documents have been exchanged between the parties in the Matter of Harrison 

Yacht Sales, Inc. 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By: (YIOAII . fnnJi' W l\]rC(M^ha Date: fXlf- 3^3; ;?^/ 6 

Mary M^eline McCarthy (j 

Deputy Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718 553-3267 

Facsimile: 718 995-5699 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Complainant's Response to Notice of Prehearing 

Conference has been served addressed as follows: 

FEDERAL EXPRESS MAIL 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Administrative Law Jiidge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

FEDERAL EXPRESS MAIL 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

President 

Harrison Yacht Sales, Inc. 

106 Wells Cove Road 

P O Box 98 

Grasonville, MD 21638 

Date /dj^^hpi ^ \>^^ J^:^L/L : 

J o ^ Maher 

lanagement & Program Analyst 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Melendez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey Atlas, J.), rendered December 2, 1988, convicting defendant, after a trial by jury, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

This Court has already found, on review of the conviction of defendant’s co-defendant *(People v Rivera,*171 AD2d 459), that the court’s missing witness charge and the prosecutor’s comment concerning the defendants’ failure to produce a witness were not improper. We see no reason to disturb that finding. Moreover, a review of the record reveals that other comments made by the prosecutor in summation, which defendant argues deprived him of a fair trial, were in large part a fair response to the comments of both defense counsel. *(People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396; *People v Rivera,*158 AD2d 344.) To the extent that these comments may have exceeded the bounds of fair comment, any error was clearly harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt *(People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230).

Defendant’s *pro se*argument concerning the propriety of the verdict sheet has not been preserved for review. (CPL 470.05 [2].) Moreover, were we to review it in the interest of justice, we would find that the verdict sheets were completely proper and in compliance with CPL 310.20.

Finally, the dismissal of two alternate jurors after the commencement of deliberations outside the presence of defendant and counsel, does not require reversal. It is not only clear from the record that defense counsel consented to the discharge, as required by CPL 270.30, but, since the regular jury was able to reach a verdict without recourse to the alternates, even had there been error, no prejudice would have been caused to defendant. Moreover, defendant’s presence was not required for the court to perform this purely ministerial act *(see, People v Brown,*168 AD2d 357). Concur— Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CertificationPursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DynCorp International LLC (the “Company”)for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, HerbertJ. Lanese, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(i)    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: August 14, 2006 |   | /s/ HERBERT J.  LANESE                                    |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Herbert J. Lanese                                         |
|                       |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                       |   | (principal executive officer)                             |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,390
<INVENTORY>                                     59,775
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,134
<PP&E>                                          94,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,958
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,527
<SALES>                                        240,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,065
<CGS>                                          185,547
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,905
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,258
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,647
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,647
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
        



</TABLE>
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0298

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM072AD

84-57-22, RA --- 12/9/10

84-57-23, RA --- 12/9/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 3:38 PM

To: 'chris@topsailarea.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Petition for Exemption: Lewis Re alty Associates, Inc. (FAA-2015-0195)



### May 28, 2015

Dear Mr. Rackley:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0195). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make, mode l, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, ro torcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description shoul d include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by June 11, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William P. Search, Appellant.

Casey, J. P.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Monserrate, J.), rendered December 29, 1989, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of scheme to defraud in the first degree.

Defendant was indicted on one count of grand larceny in the fourth degree and two counts of scheme to defraud in the first degree. Pursuant to a negotiated plea bargain, defendant entered a plea of guilty to the second count of the indictment which charged scheme to defraud in the first degree, and he was sentenced as a second felony offender to the most lenient term of imprisonment of *IV2*to 3 years. The count to which defendant entered his guilty plea, charged that defendant intended to defraud 10 or more persons, and knowing that the *971checks he issued would be dishonored by the drawee, uttered and passed checks drawn on his account and as a result obtained property valued in excess of $1,000.

On this appeal, defendant, citing *People v Thiel*(26 AD2d 897), contends that the indictment in general and the count to which he pleaded in particular are void because the victims of the thefts were different persons and the thefts occurred in different places.

We find defendant’s claim untenable. Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of scheme to defraud in the first degree, not grand larceny. The second count of the indictment, to which defendant entered his plea, was properly pleaded *(see, People v Palmer,*108 AD2d 545) and is not jurisdictionally defective. There is, therefore, no reason to disturb defendant’s negotiated plea to a valid count of the indictment. Defendant’s attack on the sentence imposed is likewise meritless. The sentence was the most lenient which could be imposed upon a predicate felon. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction should in all respects be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed. Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur.
### Revised EGU GHG NSPS Files **RobertJ Wayland** to : Frey, Nathan J., Cortney_Higgins Cc : fellner.christian, Nick Hutson, johnson.mary, Kevin Culligan

From: RobertJ W ayland/RTP/USEPA/US To: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>, Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov Cc: fellner.christian@epa.gov, Nick Hutson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, johnson.m ary@epa.gov, Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Nathan - Per our conversation last week, attached are some revised preamble files for the EGU GHG NSPS. Hopefully, these are closer to the specificity you were looking for. L et me/Kevin know if you have any questions/concerns. thanx! bob Robert J. W a yl and, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243 - 01 RTP, NC 2 7711 Phone: ( 919) 541 - 1045 Cell: ( 919) 306 - 2290 Fax: (919) 541 - 5450
e - ma il: w ay land.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt *********************************************************

EO 12866 EGU GHG NSPS CC 2 - 13.docx
EO 12866 EGU GHG NSPS combined standard 2 - 13.docxexecutive summary 2 - 13 - 12.docx

transitional sources - 2 - 13 - 12.docx
**Exhibit 32.1**








**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**


**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB  of
  Toro Ventures Inc. (the "Registrant") for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
  2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
  I, Yan Liu, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
  Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our
  knowledge and belief:





(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
  Registrant.





Date: April 27, 2006
      By:
      /s/ Yan LiuYan LiuChief Executive Officer, President  and Principal Financial Officer





A
  signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
  document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
  that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
  statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will
  be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2113 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2113

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing 2,4,6-Tripropyl-
 1,3,5,2,4,6-trioxatriphosphinane 2,4,6-trioxide and organic solvents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

   Mr. Bond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing 2,4,6-Tripropyl-
 1,3,5,2,4,6-trioxatriphosphinane 2,4,6-trioxide and organic solvents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING 2,4,6-TRIPROPYL-1,3,5,2,4,6-
              TRIOXATRIPHOSPHINANE 2,4,6-TRIOXIDE AND ORGANIC SOLVENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Mixtures            Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          containing 2,4,6-                                                  31/2011.......
                          Tripropyl-
                          1,3,5,2,4,6-
                          trioxatriphosphin
                          ane 2,4,6-
                          trioxide (CAS No.
                          68957-94-8) and
                          organic solvents
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3824.90.92)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Monty Lee EDDINGS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. C-78-325.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 26, 1984.

ORDER WITHDRAWING OPINION AND SETTING ORAL ARGUMENT

On January 9, 1984, this Court entered an opinion in the above styled and numbered appeal affirming the trial court’s re-sentencing in Creek County District Court, Case No. CRF-77-118. On Petition for Rehearing, counsel for appellant reminds this Court that through inadvertance or oversight the opinion was rendered without allowing oral argument in accordance with Title 21 O.S.1981, § 701.13(D), and requests that the opinion be withdrawn and that oral argument be granted.

NOW THEREFORE, after considering appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and being fully advised in the premises, this Court finds that the Petition should be granted and that the opinion of January 9, 1984, should be withdrawn from publication.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT, that the opinion filed for publication on January 9, 1984, shall be withdrawn from publication in its entirety.

IT IS THE FURTHER ORDER OF THIS COURT, that this appeal shall be set down for oral argument to be had on Wednesday, May 23, 1984, at 10:00 o’clock a.m. in the courtroom of the Court of Criminal Appeals, State Capitol, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

WITNESS OUR HANDS AND THE SEAL OF THIS COURT, this the 26th day of April, 1984.

HEZ J. BUSSEY, P.J.

TOM BRETT, J.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5850]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

Board Votes to Close March 1, 2012, Meeting

    By telephone vote on March 1, 2012, members of the Board of 
Governors of the United States Postal Service met and voted unanimously 
to close to public observation its meeting held in Washington, DC, via 
teleconference. The Board determined that no earlier public notice was 
possible.

ITEMS CONSIDERED:
    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Financial Matters.

GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION: The General Counsel of the United States 
Postal Service has certified that the meeting was properly closed under 
the Government in the Sunshine Act.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Requests for information about the 
meeting should be addressed to the Secretary of the Board, Julie S. 
Moore, at (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5850 Filed 3-7-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 906 Certification

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of NCI, Inc. (the Company)
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, to
the best of his knowledge and belief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                                                
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 2, 2007 |  | /s/ CHARLES K. NARANG                                                          
|                       |  | Charles K. Narang                                                              
|                       |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NCI, Inc. and will be
retained by NCI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. Thorne, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of DynCorp International LLC (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| |  | /s/MICHAEL J. THORNEMichael J. Thorne
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 7, 2007
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks