alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006167EN.01002401.xml

| 20.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 167/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 167/24

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 902/2006

of 19 June 2006

determining the extent to which applications lodged in June 2006 for import licences under the regime provided for by tariff quotas for certain products in the pigmeat sector for the period 1 July to 30 September 2006 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 of 18 August 2003 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for certain products in the pigmeat sector (1), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The applications for import licences lodged for the third quarter of 2006 are for quantities less than the quantities available and can therefore be met in full. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The applications for import licences lodged for the third quarter of 2006 are for quantities less than the quantities available and can therefore be met in full.

| (2) | The surplus to be added to the quantity available for the following period should be determined, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The surplus to be added to the quantity available for the following period should be determined,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 July to 30 September 2006 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 shall be met as referred to in Annex I.

2.   For the period 1 October to 31 December 2006, applications may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 for import licences for a total quantity as referred to in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 208, 19.8.2003, p. 3. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 341/2005 (OJ L 53, 26.2.2005, p. 28).

1

---

ANNEX I

| Order No | Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period 1 July to 30 September 2006 |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4038 | 100 |
| 09.4039 | 100 |
| 09.4071 | — |
| 09.4072 | — |
| 09.4073 | — |
| 09.4074 | 100 |

Order No

Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period 1 July to 30 September 2006

09.4038

100

09.4039

100

09.4071

—

09.4072

—

09.4073

—

09.4074

100

---

ANNEX II

| (t) |
| --- |
| Order No | Total quantity available for the period 1 October to 31 December 2006 |
| 09.4038 | 14 653,748 |
| 09.4039 | 2 250,0 |
| 09.4071 | 1 500,0 |
| 09.4072 | 3 050,0 |
| 09.4073 | 7 500,0 |
| 09.4074 | 2 640,700 |

(t)

Order No

Total quantity available for the period 1 October to 31 December 2006

09.4038

14 653,748

09.4039

2 250,0

09.4071

1 500,0

09.4072

3 050,0

09.4073

7 500,0

09.4074

2 640,700

---
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocation

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license has been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 
409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515, effective on 
the corresponding date shown below:
    License Number: 020852N.
    Name: OTS Int'l, Inc. dba OTS Logistics.
    Address: 3120 Via Mondo, Rancho Dominguez, CA 90220.
    Date Revoked: January 27, 2012.
    Reason: Voluntarily surrendered license.

Vern W. Hill,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2012-5562 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Exhibit
10.6


[Cantel Medical
Corp. Letterhead]


December 18, 2006


 


TO:  STEVEN C. ANAYA


Dear Steve:


This letter confirms that
the term of your Employment Agreement dated November 1, 2004 has been extended
for a one year period ending October 31, 2008.


Please acknowledge and
confirm your agreement to the extension by signing and returning a copy of this
letter to Joanna Albrecht.


 


	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ James P. Reilly

  
	
  President and CEO

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  ACKNOWLEDGED and CONFIRMED:

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ Steven C. Anaya

  	
   

  
	
  Steven C. Anaya
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF


BAYING ECOLOGICAL HOLDING GROUP INC.


FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Parsh Patel, am the Chief Executive Officer of Baying Ecological Holding Group Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three month period ended September 30, 2010 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






July 31, 2014
By:
/s/ Parsh PatelParsh PatelPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Opinion issued September 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00670-CR

———————————

IN RE RONALD WAYNE SCHOFIELD, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Ronald Wayne Schofield, has filed a pro se petition for writ of 

mandamus, seeking to compel the respondent trial court to rule on his pending 

application for a writ of habeas corpus seeking relief from his felony conviction for 

failure to register as a sex offender.

1

 

1 Respondent is the Honorable Kerry L. Neves, 10th Judicial District Court of 

Galveston County, Texas. The underlying case is State of Texas v. Ronald 

Wayne Schofield, No. 06CR3089, 10th District Court, Galveston County, 

Texas, the Honorable Kerry L. Neves presiding. We affirmed relator’s 
2

We dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07(3)(a) (West Supp. 

2013).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

 

conviction for the second-degree felony of failure to register as a sex 

offender. Schofield v. State, 274 S.W.3d 1, 4 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st 

Dist.] 2009, pet. ref’d).
### Sky Guardian LLC Unmanned Aerial Solutions P.O. Box 1074

. Bisbee, AZ 85603 WWW.SKYGUARDIAN.ORG December 22 , 2015

RE: Amendment No. 2 to Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0514 Exemption No. 11604 Which was approved on May 15, 2015

We request allowance to amend our Exemption No. 11604 to include the following platform:

AD

- 2 UAS system. Operating instructions are not added to this request however will be added to the operating instructions on file at our office. Operating instructions are basica lly the same as instructions for the AD

- Talon and the AD

- 1. Any major changes that are found will be submitted to the FAA.
Attached is a brochure of the AD

- 2

Respectfully,

John E. Gribble Flight Operations Manager jgribble@skyguardian.org 520

- 234

- 5911
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Partnership. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                       |                                                                |                                      |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Dated:     August      13, 2009    | Reef      Oil & Gas Partners, L.P.Managing      General Partner |                                      |
|                                                                       |                                                                |                                      |   |
|                                                                       | By:                                                                 | Reef      Oil & Gas Partners, GP, LLC |   |
|                                                                       |                                                                |                                      |   |
|                                                                       |                                                                |                                      |   |
|                                                                       | By:                                                                 | /s/      Michael J. Mauceli               |   |
|                                                                       | Michael      J. Mauceli                                             |                                      |
|                                                                       | Manager      and Member                                             |                                      |
|                                                                       | (principal executive      officer)                                  |                                      |

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 30, 2021

NO. 03-18-00523-CR

Bryant Edward Dulin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED ON REMAND –

OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in 

the trial court’s judgment but that there was error requiring correction. Therefore, the Court 

modifies the judgment for count I of cause number 46489 to strike the time payment fee. The 

Court also modifies the judgment for count I of cause number 46489 to delete the duplicative 

court costs. After deleting the duplicative costs, the judgment for count I of cause number 46489 

should retain a warrant fee of $40 and a warrant fee of $10. The Court affirms the judgment of 

conviction as modified. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of 

costs is made.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 30, 2021

NO. 03-18-00524-CR

Bryant Edward Dulin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED ON REMAND –

OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in 

the trial court’s judgment but that there was error requiring correction. Therefore, the Court 

modifies the judgment for count I of cause number 46491 to strike the time payment fee. The 

Court affirms the judgment of conviction as modified. Because appellant is indigent and unable 

to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-11-0000387

20-SEP-2013

08:29 AM
Exhibit 32.1**Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officers of Cray Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify, to such officers’knowledge, that:(i) theaccompanying Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period endedDecember 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:June 19, 2007                 /s/ PETER J. UNGARO                   Peter J. Ungaro              Chief Executive Officer         /s/ BRIAN C. HENRY                   Brian C. Henry              Chief Financial Officer
Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District 

MARCH 24, 2014 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b). 

1. Case No. SD32429 

 Re: STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Plaintiff-Respondent, 

 vs. 

 JEREMY ELIJAH ZAPATA, 

 Defendant-Appellant.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1962 

To reduce temporarily the duty on sodium alginate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Ms. COLLINS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on sodium alginate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SODIUM ALGINATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Sodium alginate (CAS No. 

9005–38–3) (provided for in 

subheading 3913.10.00) ........ 2.1% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1962 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Martin E. Morrison, Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 6, 1990, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, *inter alia,*that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

On this appeal, claimant contends that the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision violated the procedural safeguards set forth in *Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin*(79 Civ 5899) insofar as he was denied the opportunity to cross-*1042examine his employer. While the employer’s testimony was taken in New York after claimant’s testimony was taken in California, claimant filed a statement responding to the employer’s testimony. The record reveals that at the time of the employer’s testimony, the Administrative Law Judge questioned the employer using claimant’s own testimony. Claimant also received notice of the hearing and could have attended if he so desired. Therefore, claimant’s procedural argument is unpersuasive *(see, Matter of Ferri [Roberts],*114 AD2d 743; *Matter of Gorbaty [Roberts],*103 AD2d 931). We also reject claimant’s argument that the Board’s prior decision was not supported by substantial evidence. Claimant himself testified that he resigned and that he was never told that he had to resign or face being fired. These facts, coupled with the employer’s testimony to the same effect, support the conclusion that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause *(see, Matter of Manson [Hartford Acc. & Indem. Group—Levine],*50 AD2d 980). Finally, the record also supports the finding of willful misrepresentation *(see, Matter of Muller [Levine],*50 AD2d 1005, *lv denied*40 NY2d 806). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be lacking in merit.

Decision affirmed, without costs. Weiss, J. P., Yesawich, Jr., Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION

In fiscal 2007, non-employee directors will receive compensation of $1,000 per
month for Board membership and $1,000 for each Board meeting attended and will
be reimbursed for out of pocket expenses in connection with attending a Board
meeting. Committee members will receive additional compensation of $750 for each
Audit, Compensation, and/or Nominating and Governance Committee meeting attended
and $500 for each Investment Review Committee meeting attended. The chairman of
the Board will receive an annual stipend of $4,000 per year, the chair of the
Audit Committee will receive an annual stipend of $3,000, and the chair of the
Compensation Committee will receive an annual stipend of $2,000.

Directors who are otherwise employees of the Company do not receive any
additional compensation for their service on the Board or any of its committees.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5616]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EG12-16-000, EG12-17-000, EG12-18-000, EG12-19-000, EG12-
20-000, EG12-21-000, EG12-22-000, EG12-23-000]


Rocky Ridge Wind Project, LLC, Blackwell Wind, LLC, CPV Cimarron 
Renewable Energy Company, LLC, Minco Wind Interconnection Services, 
LLC, Shiloh III Lessee, LLC, California Ridge Wind Energy LLC, Perrin 
Ranch Wind, LLC, Erie Wind, LLC: Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt 
Wholesale Generator Status

    Take notice that during the month of February 2012, the status of 
the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign 
Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's 
regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a).

    Dated: March 2, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5616 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6546
BILLY M. FEAGIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MICHAEL MOORE; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Gree nville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-2026-6-13AK) Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 26, 1997 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Billy M. Feagin, A ppellant Pro Se. William Ansel Collins, Jr., SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Feagin v. Moore , No. CA-96-2026-6-13AK (D.S.C. Apr. 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the report of ToroVentures Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Yan Liu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Yan Liu                                   

Yan Liu, 

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 2nd, 2007
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1968 

To extend the suspension of duty on mixtures of difenoconazole and 

mefenoxam. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. CRAPO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on mixtures of 

difenoconazole and mefenoxam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF DIFENOCONAZOLE AND 

4 MEFENOXAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.53 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 mixtures of difenoconazole and mefenoxam) is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and by inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1968 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS