alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006270EN.01004801.xml

| 29.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 270/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 270/48

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1429/2006

of 28 September 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 958/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 28 September 2006, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 28 September 2006, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The Management Committee for Sugar has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for Sugar has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 28 September 2006, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 shall be 35,481 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 September 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 September 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 49.

2

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1b



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
UroQuest Medical Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-32725) on Form S-8 of UroQuest Medical Corporation of our report dated
February 10, 1997, relating to the consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1996 of
UroQuest Medical Corporation and subsidiaries, which report appears in the
December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of UroQuest Medical Corporation.


                                                   /s/ KPMG LLP


Salt Lake City, Utah
March 30, 1999
### DO46130206829871100 DO462W Feb 6, 2013 CDX Imogene Treble Product Regulatory Leader The Dow Chemical Company
trebleie@dow.com 908-431-5934

1803 Building Midland MI 48674 Imogene Treble Product Regulatory Leader The Dow Chemical Company

trebleie@dow.com 908-431-5934

1803 Building Midland MI 48674 USA



## X SANITIZED SUBMISSIONDue to the large size of the files the test data will be submitted as 4 support files SANITIZED SUBMISSION001 Acute Dermal Public AC Dermal Tox Public.pdf 49 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 001 Attachment Name Acute Dermal Public 

## Associated PMN Section Number

N/A Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number DO46130206829871100 SANITIZED SUBMISSION
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2125 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on (S)-cyano(3- 

phenoxyphenyl)methyl (S)-4-chloro-α-(1-methylethyl)benzeneacetate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on (S)-cyano(3- 

phenoxyphenyl)methyl (S)-4-chloro-α-(1- 

methylethyl)benzeneacetate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. (S)-CYANO(3-PHENOXYPHENYL)METHYL (S)-4- 

4 CHLORO-α-(1- 

5 METHYLETHYL)BENZENEACETATE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.45 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 (S)-cyano(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl (S)-4-chloro-α-(1- 

9 methylethyl)benzeneacetate (Esfenvalerate)) is amended 

10 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2125 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Keewatin Windpower Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: April 18, 2007


/s/ Chris Craddock
------------------------------------
Chris Craddock, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
# L_2006158EN.01001101.xml

| 10.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 158/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 158/11

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 853/2006

of 9 June 2006

on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat (2),

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f).

| (2) | Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 at 11 500 t. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 at 11 500 t.

| (3) | It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 June 2006 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.

2.   Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of July 2006 for 958,333 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 June 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 408/2006 (OJ L 71, 10.3.2006, p. 3).

2

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to (i) the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-16939) pertaining to The 1994 Incentive Plan of Clean Diesel
Technologies, Inc., as amended through June 9, 1999 of our report dated March 7,
2000, with respect to the financial statements of Clean Diesel Technologies,
Inc. and (ii) the inclusion of our report in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1999.


/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 23, 2000



--------------------------
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

June 8, 2016 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

BY CERTIFIED MAIL -RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: In the matter of Offshore Flight School, Inc; 

FDMS No. FAA-2014-0691 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

RECEIVED 

JUN 1 3 2016 

HEARING DOCKET 

I hereby file my Notice of Appearance in this matter. Robert Spitzer, the attorney 

formerly assigned to this matter, is no longer with the Federal Aviation Administration. 

Going forward, I will be the attorney of record and all communications for the Federal 

Aviation Administration should be addressed to Charles Raley, Senior Attorney, 

Enforcement Division/AGC-300, Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20591, (202) 267-

3357, facsimile (202) 267-5106. 

Sincerely, 

Charles Raley, Senior Attorney 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Telephone: (202) 267-3357 

Facsimile: (202) 267-5106 
Cc by Certified Mail: 

David Glenn Bettencourt, Esq. 

Suite 304 Dillingham Transportation Building 

735 Bishop Street 

Honolulu, HI 96813 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2WIOOO
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Thrive World Wide, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2010, I, Andrew Schenker, Chief Executive Officer of Thrive World Wide, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.           Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Thrive World Wide, Inc.




Dated: February 21, 2011




/s/Andrew SchenkerAndrew Schenker, Chief Executive Officer ofThrive World Wide, Inc.
# L_2006039EN.01001901.xml

| 10.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 39/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 39/19

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 235/2006

of 9 February 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the import of maize issued in Regulation (EC) No 1809/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported in Portugal from third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1809/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported in Portugal from third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1809/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified, to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified, to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 3 to 9 February 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on imported maize issued in Regulation (EC) No 1809/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 February 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 February 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 291, 5.11.2005, p. 4.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1558/2005 (OJ L 249, 24.9.2005, p. 6).

3

---
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5962]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>13025 and <greek-i>13026]


Oregon Disaster <greek-i>OR-00041

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Oregon (FEMA-4055-
DR), dated 03/02/2012.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storm, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.
    Incident Period: 01/17/2012 through 01/21/2012.
    Effective Date: 03/02/2012.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/01/2012.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/03/2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 03/02/2012, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Benton, Columbia, Coos, Curry, Douglas, Hood River, Lane, Lincoln, 
Linn, Marion, Polk, Tillamook.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.125
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 13025B 
and for economic injury is 13026B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-5962 Filed 3-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132118 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132118 

 COA: 259431 

Wayne CC: 04-003608-01

GREGORY LEE BERRY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0220 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2007 

 Clerk
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ANTHONY LEON JOHNSON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10085

D.C. No. 1:03-cr-05053-AWI

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Anthony Leon Johnson appeals from the denial of his motion to reconsider

his 240-month sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

affirm.

FILED

DEC 27 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-10085

Johnson contends that the district court improperly denied his motion to

reconsider his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) by failing to consider a

sentence outside of the career offender guidelines. The district court did not have

jurisdiction to resentence Johnson based on his § 3582(c) motion because Johnson

was sentenced pursuant to Guideline § 4B1.1. See United States v. Wesson, 583

F.3d 728, 730-32 (9th Cir. 2009).

Johnson also contends that his sentence was substantively unreasonable. In

Johnson’s previous appeal, this court already determined that his 240-month

sentence was reasonable.

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7063
WAYNE P. THOMAS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH BROOKS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-01-265-3) Submitted: November 28, 2001 Decided: December 19, 2001 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wayne P. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Wayne P. Thomas appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (1994) after construing it as a motion to vacate or set aside his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thomas v. Brooks , No. CA-01-265-3 (E.D. Va. May 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED