alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
TORO VENTURES INC.
FORM 10-Q FOR THE  THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joe Arcaro, am the
Chief Executive Officer of Toro Ventures Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three month period ended September 30,
2010 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|Date: June 17, 2013                                                                     
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: /s/ Joseph Arcaro
        Joseph Arcaro
        Chief Executive Officer and Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2242

STARSHA SEWELL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District 

Judge. (8:12-cv-02402-DKC)

Submitted: February 24, 2014 Decided: March 10, 2014

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie A. Lewis, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order 

denying, for want of jurisdiction, her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) 

motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order 

remanding this action to state court. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Prince 

George’s Cnty. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 8:12-cv-02402-DKC (D. 

Md. Oct. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2006233EN.01000501.xml

| 26.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 233/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 233/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1277/2006

of 25 August 2006

amending Regulation (EC) No 1845/2005 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of maize held by the Czech intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1845/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of 131 185 tonnes of maize held by the Czech intervention agency. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1845/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of 131 185 tonnes of maize held by the Czech intervention agency.

| (2) | Given the current market situation, the quantities of maize put up for sale by the Czech intervention agency on the internal market should be increased, taking the permanent invitation to tender to 154 783 tonnes. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Given the current market situation, the quantities of maize put up for sale by the Czech intervention agency on the internal market should be increased, taking the permanent invitation to tender to 154 783 tonnes.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 1845/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 1845/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 1845/2005 is amended as follows:

| 1. | in Article 1, ‘131 185 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘154 783 tonnes’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

in Article 1, ‘131 185 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘154 783 tonnes’;

| 2. | in the title of the Annex, ‘131 185 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘154 783 tonnes’. |
| --- | --- |

2.

in the title of the Annex, ‘131 185 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘154 783 tonnes’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 August 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 296, 12.11.2005, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 923/2006 (OJ L 170, 23.6.2006, p. 3).

2

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
  US
    BioEnergy Corporation
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
 OF THE
    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    1.
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q
    of US BioEnergy Corporation;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this report, fairly present in
    all material respects the financial condition, results of
    operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
    periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(e)
    and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and  (c)
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
    registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrants internal control over
    financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
    disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
    controls over financial reporting, to the registrants
    auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal controls over financial
    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and  (b)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: August 10, 2007

/s/  Richard
    K.
    AtkinsonRichard
    K. Atkinson
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chelsea Therapeutics International, Ltd. (the Company) for
the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Simon Pedder, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Simon PedderSimon PedderPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 5, 2009
_________________________________________ 

 

 

_________________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133924 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DOUGLAS SHANES, Personal Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Marcella Shanes,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133924 

 COA: 264651 

Jackson CC: 02-000044-NH 

SHAHZAD A. SHAIKH, M.D. 

and W. A. FOOTE MEMORIAL 

HOSPITAL, 

 Defendants, 

and 

DR. JAVAID BASHIR and 

NAVEED SIDDIQI, M.D., 

 Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF JACKSON 

and DR. LOWELL FISHER,

 Defendants-Appellants. 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 20, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of Braverman v Garden City Hosp (Docket Nos. 134445-134446) is pending on 

appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in 

the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in 

ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case. 

l1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,427
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (281)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,994
<PP&E>                                           5,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (4,039)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,844
<BONDS>                                          7,025
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,396
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,345
<SALES>                                         38,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,251
<CGS>                                           30,778
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    859
<INCOME-TAX>                                       383
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                476
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,014
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,490
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
     FROM THE DECEMBER 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COATES
     INTERNATIONAL, LTD. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000948426
<NAME>                        Coates International, Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                         147,249
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               147,249
<PP&E>                                       1,936,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                 354,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,731,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,183,827
<BONDS>                                        160,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,564
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     541,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,731,803
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,262
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,427,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (15,650)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (11,432,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (11,432,186)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (11,432,186)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.89)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Andrew
Schenker, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of THRIVE WORLD WIDE,
Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and
  5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:
      May 24, 2010
                  
                  /s/ Andrew
      SchenkerAndrew
      Schenker
                    Chief
      Executive Officer
                    (principal
      executive officer)
November 5, 2015

 Exemption No. 11360A

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA−2015–0107

Mr. Jonathan B. Hill

Counsel for Building 10, LLC

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Suite 700

Washington, DC 20004–2400

Dear Mr. Hill:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated June 30, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Building 10, LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an amendment to your 

current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 

61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and 

(2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the 

petitioner to operate a UAS to perform closed-set motion picture and television filming. You 

requested an amendment to conduct real estate filming and flight training1to your operations.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

 

1 The petitioner requested authority to conduct UAS training. At this time, the FAA is unable to authorize UAS 

operations for training until a further assessment is completed. When the FAA completes its review, we will 

proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the petitioner. However, the petitioner is permitted 

to train its own pilot in commands and visual observers in accordance with condition no. 14 and the other 

conditions and limitations in this exemption.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 11360 

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to add aerial data collection2to its UAS operations.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 11360 remain in effect.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service

 

2 Aerial data collection includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the UA. 

Examples include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF 

analysis, etc.), chemical measurement (particulate measurement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by 

instruments aboard the UA.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-12-0000867 

26-JUN-2014 

01:47 PM 

SCWC-12-0000867
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

KONDAUR CAPITAL CORPORATION,


Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,
 

vs.
 

LEIGH MATSUYOSHI,


Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-12-0000867; CIV. NO. 12-1-0185)
 

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 


(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee Kondaur Capital 

Corporation’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on May 

15, 2014, is hereby accepted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be 

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant 

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move 

for retention of oral argument. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 26, 2014. 

Michael C. Bird and 

Thomas J. Berger

for petitioner 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

Joe P. Moss 

for respondent
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna


/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson