alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsCommentaries     Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians
        
            Commentaries
 Keyword
 Type Select a CategoryTop StoriesMission/TrainingFeaturesSecretary of the AFAF Chief of StaffChief Master Sgt. of the AFCommentariesSequestration NewsSpace/TechnologyHumanitarianAFSO 21Women's History Month 1-15EnvironmentalWarrior CareDiversityDignified TransferSafetyHeritageAir Force FamilyPersonnel MattersCommander's Call TopicsHaiti Earthquake ReliefDon't Ask Don't TellSuicide PreventionWarrior GamesEnergyAircraftEtchbergerSexual AssaultOperation TomodachiOperation Odyssey Dawn2011 Appropriations InformationHurricane Irene9/11AFAWeek in PhotosThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their Words2012 Appropriations InformationAfrican American History MonthAfrican American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29Fiscal Year BudgetAir Force StoriesColorado WildfireChief of Staff ArchiveHurricane IsaacAFA 2012APP RSSAPP Airman VisualsExpeditionary OperationsHurricane SandyTransition GPSAir Force in SpaceSports/RecreationH1N1Women's History Month 16-30Oklahoma Tornado ReliefMemorial DayCOVID-19 CommentariesCOVID-19
 RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 Sept. 12, 2018Lessons from failure
        Thirty-two. Thirty-three. Thirty-four. Thirty-five -- time’s up. Somewhere in Texas a senior airman failed his fitness test. He couldn’t complete the minimum requirement for abdominal crunches.Dragging himself back to his car, ashamed and furious with himself, he realized that he was now one of  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1705 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1705

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber tow containing 
                 a minimum of 92 percent acrylonitrile.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2009

 Mr. Barrasso introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber tow containing 
                 a minimum of 92 percent acrylonitrile.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC FIBER TOW CONTAINING A MINIMUM OF 92 PERCENT 
              ACRYLONITRILE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Acrylic fiber tow   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (polyacrylonitril                                                  31/2011.......
                        e tow) containing
                        a minimum of 92
                        percent
                        acrylonitrile by
                        weight, from 200
                        to 600 ppm sodium
                        and no organic
                        solvent, the
                        foregoing wound
                        into spools each
                        containing 24,000
                        filaments and
                        with average
                        filament
                        measuring 1.3
                        decitex (plus or
                        minus 0.15)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        5501.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2006256EN.01001501.xml

| 24.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/15

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4225 — CELSA/FUNDIA)

(2006/C 256/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 28 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4225. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4225. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1969 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1969

          To extend the suspension of duty on difenoconazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

   Mr. Crapo introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend the suspension of duty on difenoconazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIFENOCONAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.12 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to difenoconazole) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2009'' and by inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Dennis Alan CHASTAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. C-84-267.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 13, 1985.

Elaine Meek, Asst. Appellate Public Defender, Norman, for appellant.

No response necessary from appellee.

OPINION

BRETT, Judge:

Appellant, Dennis Alan Chastain, also known as Dennes Alan Chastain, entered a plea of guilty to Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (Motor Vehicle) in Marshall County District Court, Case No. CRF-82-104, on June 9, 1983. On January 27, 1984, an Order of Acceleration of Sentence was filed, and appellant was given a sentence of five years. Appellant filed a Motion to Withdraw Plea of Guilty on February 6, 1984, which was overruled by the trial court February 22, 1984. The Petition for Writ of Certiorari was filed with this Court in accordance with Section IV, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in accepting his guilty plea without determining if there was a factual basis for the plea. Appellant denied having the intent required for the crime charged under 21 O.S.Supp.1983, § 645. The requisite intent may be supplied by the culpable negligence of the defendant operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. *Matin v. State,*333 P.2d 585 (Okl.Cr.1958). *See also, Lott v. State,*92 Okl.Cr. 324, 223 P.2d 147 (1950); *Beck v. State,*73 Okl.Cr. 229, 119 P.2d 865 (1941). Appellant testified that he was intoxicated when he struck the victim with his truck, thus supplying the element of intent necessary for conviction, and providing the factual basis for the plea.

Appellant also claims that the procedure by which the trial court accepted appel*540lant’s guilty plea violates the guidelines set down in *King v. State,*553 P.2d 529 (Okl.Cr.1976)., The trial judge mistakenly informed appellant that the maximum sentence possible under the crime charged was five years in the state penitentiary, when in fact, the maximum sentence is 10 years, under 21 O.S.Supp.1983, § 645. It is appellant’s contention that due to this mistake he did not understand the serious nature of the crime charged, nor the consequences of Ms guilty plea.

Permitting withdrawal of a guilty plea is within the discretion of the trial court, and the burden is on the defendant to show that the guilty plea was entered through ignorance or inadvertance, influence or without deliberation, in violation of *King,*and that there is a defense that should be presented to a jury. *Elmore v. State,*624 P.2d 78 (Okl.Cr.1981).

Appellant has offered no proof to show that his plea was due to failure to understand the consequences of his guilty plea.

Appellant offers only one defense which he feels should be presented to a jury, namely, his lack of intent. We have discussed this issue above, and find the defense of lack of intent to be wholly without merit.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the trial court overruling appellant’s Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea is AFFIRMED.

PARKS, P.J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2112 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2112

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain children's textile upper 
                               footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

   Mr. Bond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain children's textile upper 
                               footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CHILDREN'S TEXTILE UPPER FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Footwear with       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        outer soles of                                                     31/2011.......
                        leather or
                        composition
                        leather and with
                        uppers of textile
                        materials, for
                        persons other
                        than for men or
                        women (provided
                        for in subheading
                        6404.20.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    Home





    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    CSAF Reading List    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    2015 CSAF Reading List

    2014 CSAF Reading List

    2013 CSAF Reading List

    2012 CSAF Reading List

    2011 CSAF Reading List

    2010 CSAF Reading List

    2009 CSAF Reading List

    2008 CSAF Reading List

    2007 CSAF Reading List

    2006 CSAF Reading List

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Desert Storm 25th Anniversary

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2020

    Focus on Priorities





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (1.78 MB)
 
 oef Staff Sgt. Evelyn Chavez English teaching Staff Sgt. Linette Nosim volunteer Bagram Airfield LRS Afghanistan
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR Act
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
p.1 

OAR Box 1107 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

62) IV-B-12 

Docket Number: 

A-81-21 

Printed 4/11/2008 3:03:47 PM Sheet 62 of 90 
P.2 

A-8.I-2I 

IV-B-12 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

1

^ W ^ S Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

^Ifc^b / Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 

o, 

X, 

2 7 AUG 1986 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Discussions with OMB on VC Promulgation Package 

FROM: Fred Dimmick ^T** 

Standards Development Branch (MD-13) 

TO: Record 

During July and August 1986, I discussed the vinyl chloride (VC) 

promulgation package with Mr. Art Fraas of the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB). He had two basic questions: (1) why did we not complete a 

risk assessment for this package and (2) what is the TRE (total resource 

effectiveness) for oxychlorination vents at VC plants. In response, I 

answered, respectively, that (1) because during our review study we had not 

found a need to change the stringency of the standards, a risk assessment 

would have used our limited resources without adding useful information 

to the package (we were revising the standard only to clarify uncertain 

administrative aspects of the rule) and, therefore, we did not complete 

a risk assessment and (2) the TRE ranged from 0.5 for most new sources to 

about 1.4 for the only existing source without an incinerator. Mr. Fraas 

was concerned about whether we needed to cite the new source performance 

standards (NSPS) for air oxidation [in addition to requirements under new 

source review (NSR)] as a basis for not increasing the stringency of the 

oxychlorination vent standard. Because NSR includes consideration of 

NSPS, citing NSPS directly is not needed and I told Mr. Fraas this. Based 

on our removing the citation on the bottom of page 6 to the NSPS for air 

oxidation, Mr. Fraas felt that OMB could approve the VC promulgation 

package. 

cc: B. Ajax (MD-13) 

J. Farmer (MD-13) 

E. Salo (LE-132A) 

V. Thomson (ANR-443) 

S. Wyatt (MD-13)
MEMORANDUM

TO: SIP Fix Rulemaking Docket, ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0107 

FROM: Lisa Sutton 

DATE: August 23, 2010 

SUBJECT: NACAA Call on SIP Fix Rules 

Today at 2:00 pm ET, the National Association of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA) held a 

conference call with U.S. EPA staff, for the purpose of providing to all association members the 

opportunity for Q&A (questions and answers) on EPA's SIP call proposal and FIP proposal, both 

proposals signed August 12, 2010. The call was coordinated by Misti Duvall of NACAA and 

Anna Wood of EPA/OAQPS. 

LS
**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

|                                      |                                 |                             |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                                      |                                 |
|                                 |                            |                        |
| Date: November              15, 2007 | By:                        | /s/ B.K.              Gogia |
|                                      | B.K.              Gogia              |
|                                      | Chief              Executive Officer |
|                                      |                                 |                                      |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                 |
|                                 |                            |                                 |
| Date: November              15, 2007 | By:                        | /s/ Scott              B. Parliament |
|                                      | Scott              B. Parliament     |
|                                      | Chief              Financial Officer |

----
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*MARLIK MOURNING

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15913.

*Nancy Burton,*in support of the petition.

*Robert C. Brunetti,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 15, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 916 (AC 16679), is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “Under the circumstances of this case, did the trial court abuse its discretion by revoking the defendant’s probation of a conviction as a youthful offender and by sentencing the defendant to imprisonment?”
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2098 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2098

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain isotopic separation machinery 
                             and apparatus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Bingaman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce temporarily the duty on certain isotopic separation machinery 
                             and apparatus.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ISOTOPIC MACHINERY AND APPARATUS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.84.05       Isotopic            2.2%         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          separation                                                         31/2011.......
                          cascades designed
                          for the
                          enrichment of
                          uranium using
                          gaseous
                          centrifuge
                          technology
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8401.20.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, Peter Toscano, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Operating Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of International Power Group, Ltd. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    November 20, 2006      /s/Peter ToscanoPeter Toscano(Chief Executive Officer, Principal Operating Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors )