alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2** **CHIEF    FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**     I, Dennis K. Knapp, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of Avanade Inc. for the period ended February 29, 2008, as    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date    hereof;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: April 14, 2008 /s/  Dennis    K. Knapp    Dennis K. Knapp
I, Kennedy Kerster, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Icon Development Inc. (the Registrant), certify that;

(1)

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant;







(2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;







(3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;







(4)

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:







a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;







b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and







c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and







(5)

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):







a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and











b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:

November 20, 2006









/s/Kennedy Kerster

By:

Kennedy Kerster

Title:

President, Chief Executive Officer



and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

National Institute of Corrections


Advisory Board Meeting

    Time and Date: 8 AM-4:30 PM on Monday, April 02, 2012; 8 AM-12 PM 
on Tuesday, April 03, 2012.
    Place: Federal Bureau of Prisons, 500 First Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20534, (202) 514-4222.
    Matters To Be Considered: Directors report; review of outcomes of 
November 2-3, 2011 Advisory Board Hearing (Shifting the Focus to 
Reshape Our Thinking Toward Performance Based Outcomes), presentations, 
future planning.
    Contact Person For More Information: Thomas Beauclair, Deputy 
Director, (202) 307-3106, extension 44254.

Morris L. Thigpen, Sr.,
Director, National Institute of Corrections.
[FR Doc. 2012-5682 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1996 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain swimming pools. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain swimming pools. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SWIMMING POOLS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Children’s inflatable swimming pools of polyvinyl chloride not exceeding 1.651 meters in diameter (provided for 

in subheading 9506.99.55) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1996 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED, PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 Form 10-K Issuer
  (i)
    
    the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer as of the
dates and for the periods indicated in the Form 10-K.
 /s/ Larry L. Enterline

Larry L. Enterline
    
    /s/ Amy Bobbitt

Amy BobbittChief Executive Officer
    
    Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting OfficerMarch 1, 2010
    
    March 1, 2010
# C_2007006EN.01000201.xml

| 11.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4466 — HTA/CDPQ/BAA Budapest Airport)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 6/03)

On 18 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4466. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4466. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DENTS ASTARITA, M.D., Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE; AND THE HONORABLE DAVID A. HARDY, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and REBECCA KOSAK; AND MARK KOSAK, Real Parties in Interest. No. 67186 

# FILED
MAR 2 5 2016

TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLERK OF 41.1PREME COURT

PU ay S ' D



### ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a medical malpractice action. 1

Petitioner argues that the district court erred in denying the motion to dismiss and allowing amendment instead when the court found that the complaint and affidavit were deficient.

Writ relief is generally not available when a petitioner has an adequate remedy at law, such as an appeal from a final judgment. 

### See NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; 

### Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224-25, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004). Having considered the documents

1 The Honorable James W. Hardesty, Justice, voluntarily recused himself from participation in the decision of this matter.

10) 1947A 

### e IG - Oqq5.1and arguments presented in this matter, we conclude that our

extraordinary intervention is not warranted. 

### See Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844 (providing that petitioner bears the burden of showing writ relief is appropriate). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

# 2 000....2 r Parraguirre C.J.



### , J. Pickering

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 01 , 17Acc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg Stephen H. Osborne Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 1947A 

### e
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 1 3 0 8

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : T h u r s d a y

, A u g u s t 2 7

, 2 0 1 5 3 : 4 7 P M

T o : b i l l @ d e f t r a c i n g

. c o m

D e a r M r

. P a l m a t a r y :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f

o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y

o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k

e t N o

. F A A

− 2 0 1 5

− 1 3 0 8 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

P r o v i d e a c o p y o f t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l ( M P T O M ) w h i c h i s r e q u i r e d b y O r d e r

8 9 0 0

. 1

, V o l u m e 3

, C h a p t e r 8

, S e c t i o n 1

. I f y o u w i s h f o r u s t o p r o c e e d w i t h o u t t h i s m a n u a l a n d r e m o v e

c l o s e d

‐ s e t f i l m i n g f r o m y

o u r p r o p o s e d o p e r a t i o n p l e a s e i n f o r m o f u s o f y

o u r i n t e n t i o n b y t h e r e q u e s t e d

r e s p o n s e d a t e l i s t e d b e l o w

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f

o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y

o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y

o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v

e b y 9 / 1 0 / 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s

, p l e a s e f

e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 4 2 6 4

.

S i n c e r e l y ,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Iridium
Operating LLC's financial statements for the twelve months ended December 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001051721
<NAME> IRIDIUM OPERATING LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          24,756
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      186
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (93)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,901
<PP&E>                                       4,256,124
<DEPRECIATION>                               (671,915)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,738,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          297,071
<BONDS>                                      1,405,735
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,158,178
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,681,563)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,738,347
<SALES>                                            186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   186
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               987,481
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             265,214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,252,509)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,252,509)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,252,509)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Paula R. Pollack et al., Respondents, v Doris Olk, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for the alleged conversion of the proceeds of certain bank accounts, the defendant Doris Olk appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.), dated September 8, 1989, which, upon an order of the same court dated August 17, 1989, granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs, awarded judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against her in the principal sum of $26,584.81.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the order dated August 17, 1989, is *452vacated, and the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is denied.

On September 6, 1985, Yetta Segal gave the defendant Doris Oik powers of attorney on four of Segal’s accounts at the Lincoln Savings Bank. On September 9, 1985, the subject accounts were closed and teller’s checks, representing the amounts on balance, were issued to Oik. Yetta Segal died on September 16, 1985.

In support of their motion for summary judgment, the plaintiffs alleged that the subject powers of attorney were fraudulently obtained by the defendant Oik, that they "may even have been forgeries” or that Oik violated her trust. While Oik’s conduct is certainly not above suspicion, the plaintiffs have failed to establish their cause of action sufficiently to warrant a court directing judgment as a matter of law *(see, Frank Corp. v Federal Ins. Co.,*70 NY2d 966, 967; *Daliendo v Johnson,*147 AD2d 312, 317). Accordingly, summary judgment was not warranted on this record. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Kunzeman and Miller, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Premenos Technology Corp. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-97116 and 33-97114) of our
report dated January 31, 1997, except for Paragraph 3 of Note 16 as to which
the date is March 16, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and the financial statement schedule of Premenos Technology Corp.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.





San Francisco, California
March 27, 1997
Exhibit 11
          STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

NET LOSS PER SHARE
Net loss per share is calculated as follows:
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     1999         1998        1997
                                                  ---------    ---------    --------
<S>                                               <C>          <C>          <C>
Net loss                                          $ (17,328)   $ (18,728)   $(21,817)
                                                  =========    =========    ========

BASIC:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding      10,000        5,365       2,073
                                                  =========    =========    ========

     Net loss per common share                    $   (1.73)   $   (3.49)   $ (10.53)
                                                  =========    =========    ========

DILUTED:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding      10,000        5,365       2,073
     Effect of dilutive securities:
         Convertible notes                             --           --          --
         Stock options                                 --           --          --
         Warrants                                      --           --          --
                                                  ---------    ---------    --------
     Weighted average common and common
         equivalent shares outstanding               10,000        5,365       2,073
                                                  =========    =========    ========

     Net loss per common and common
         equivalent share                         $   (1.73)   $   (3.49)   $ (10.53)
                                                  =========    =========    ========
</TABLE>
# L_2006156EN.01001001.xml

| 9.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 156/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 156/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 848/2006

of 8 June 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 2 to 8 June 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 June 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---