alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2056 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on trifloxysulfuron-sodium 

technical. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

trifloxysulfuron-sodium technical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIFLOXYSULFURON-SODIUM TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.32 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 trifloxysulfuron-sodium technical) is amended by striking 

7 the date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/ 

8 31/2012’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2056 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (3.08 MB)

Tags:37th AS, 435th Contingency Response Group, 435th AGOW, 435th CRG, 37th Airlift Squadron, C-130J Super Hercules, 86th AW, 86th Airlift Wing, 435th Air Ground Operations Wing, Contested Forge

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Vincent Verdiramo, President of Serino 4, Corp. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  December 14, 2005

/s/ Vincent L. Verdiramo

___________________________



President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clarence McCary, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered April 4, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the sentencing court erred in imposing an enhanced sentence based upon his violation of one of the conditions of the plea agreement, without first giving him an opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea, is unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant neither requested the withdrawal of his plea nor moved to vacate the plea on this basis *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Connor,*168 AD2d 687). In any event, a review of the plea minutes establishes that the defendant was clearly advised of the sentence that he would receive if he violated any of the conditions of *861the plea agreement *(see, People v Asencio,*143 AD2d 917). Brown, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Margaret H. Horn, Appellant, v Philip R. Horn, Respondent.

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the petitioner mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Mosca, J.), entered August 10, 1989, which sustained the respondent father’s objections to an order of the same court (O’Shea, H.E.), entered November 29, 1988, *inter alia,*directing him to pay child support in the sum of $240 biweekly, and *541thereupon reduced the award of child support to the sum of $150 biweekly.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Family Court Judge that the Hearing Examiner’s award of child support was contrary to the weight of the credible evidence *(see, Matter of Weiner v Weiner,*97 Misc 2d 920, 923). Accordingly, we find that the Family Court Judge did not improvidently exercise his discretion in reducing that award to $150 biweekly. Hooper, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9644-7]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notification of Public Advisory Committee Teleconference.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the Good Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB) will hold a public teleconference on March 22, 2012 from 12 p.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. The meeting is open to the public. For further information regarding the teleconference and background materials, please contact Mark Joyce at the number listed below.

*Background:*                         GNEB is a federal advisory committee chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92463. GNEB provides advice and recommendations to the President and Congress on environmental and infrastructure issues along the U.S. border with Mexico.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         The purpose of this teleconference is to discuss the Good Neighbor Environmental Board's Fifteenth Report. The report will focus on water infrastructure issues in the U.S.-Mexico border region.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

If you wish to make oral comments or submit written comments to the Board, please contact Mark Joyce at least five days prior to the meeting.

*General Information:*                     Additional information concerning the GNEB can be found on its Web site at                     *www.epa.gov/​ofacmo/​gneb.*

*Meeting Access:*                     For information on access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact Mark Joyce at (202) 564-2130 or email at                     *joyce.mark@epa.gov.*                     To request accommodation of a disability, please contact Mark Joyce at least 10 days prior to the meeting to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.                

Dated: February 29, 2012.

Mark Joyce,

Acting Designated Federal Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-5531 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
ex10_40.htm








Exhibit 10.40







BEST ENERGY SERVICES, INC


5433 WESTHEIMER SUITE 825


HOUSTON, TEXAS 77056







December 14, 2009







Mr. David W. Franke


814 Wycliffe Drive


Houston, Texas  77079







Dear Mr. Franke;







This letter agreement (the “Agreement”) will evidence the understanding of David W. Franke as a Participant (“Participant”) and Best Energy Services, Inc. (“Best”) with regard to Participant’s participation in the East Texas Project known as the “Akin Prospect” currently being developed by Best Energy Ventures, LLC (“BEV”), a wholly owned subsidiary of BES.







The agreements and obligations of Participant and Best are set forth below.







Upon the execution of this Agreement, Participant shall pay Best by check or wire transfer in immediately available funds the sum of $25,000.  Best has received a short term assignment of the lease(s) comprising 100% of the working interests in the Akin Prospect (the “Term Assignment”), which Term Assignment is attached hereto as Exhibit A.  This Term Assignment is an asset of BEV.







Upon receipt of the $25,000 by Best, subject to the terms and conditions below, Best shall:








	
  

	
1)

	
Grant Participant a 5 year warrant to acquire 300,000 shares of common stock of Best at a strike price of $0.25 per share; provided, however, that in the event an equity offering by Best is closed within the next 60 days (the “Placement”), the warrant price will be reduced to the price used in such Placement (but no other adjustments will be made to the warrants).  The warrants will be evidenced by, and subject to, Best’s standard form of warrant, which shall include appropriate investment representations.













	
  

	
2)

	
Grant Participant a 6.25% Membership Interest in BEV, a currently wholly owned subsidiary of Best, which shall hold the Term Assignment of the Akin Prospect.













	
  

	
3)

	
In addition, in the event that the Akin Prospect is not developed within the time frame sufficient to hold the lease stipulated in Exhibit A, Participant will be granted 250,000 unregistered common shares in Best.











  





  











  








This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and transmitted via facsimile and/or PDF and as such shall evidence concurrence by the executing party of the terms set forth herein.







If this Agreement accurately sets forth your understanding of the agreed upon terms of the deal, please so indicate by signing below and returning an executed copy for our files








	  	
Very truly yours,


	  	  
	  	
Mark Harrington


	  	
Chairman and CEO












Accepted and Agreed to this 26th day of April 2010.








	/s/ David W. Franke
	
David W. Franke
#### NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL. *v.*JOHN B. FERRARO

(SC 15733)

Callahan, C. J., and Berdon, Norcott, Palmer and Peters, Js.

Argued February 18

officially released April 7, 1998

*Michael D. O’Connell,*with whom, on the brief, was *Julia B. Morris,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Kevin P. Walsh,*for the appellees (plaintiffs).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.1

The appeal is dismissed.

1

 We granted the defendant’s petition for certification limited to the following issue: “Whether the Appellate Court properly dismissed for lack of aggrievement the defendant’s appeal of the acceptance by the trial court, midtrial, of the plaintiffs’ withdrawal of action pursuant to General Statutes § 52-80?” *Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co.*v. *Ferraro,*242 Conn. 908, 697 A.2d 366 (1997).
#### In the Matter of Little Flower Children’s Services, Appellant, v New York State Department of Social Services et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.), dismissing petitioner-appellant’s CPLR article 78 petition to enjoin the continuance of a fair hearing pursuant to section 400 of the Social Services Law on the ground of lack of merit, and granting the cross-motion of respondents Warren and Theresa Dade for counsel fees to the extent of permitting such respondents’ counsel to submit an affidavit with respect to legal fees generated as a result of the article 78 proceeding, with the provision that petitioner-appellant may respond within two weeks of receipt of such affidavit, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This court concurs in the trial court’s finding of lack of merit to the petition herein, on both substantive and procedural grounds. The plain meaning of Social Services Law § 400 allows for a fair hearing upon application of the foster parents whenever a child is removed from a foster family home *(Smith v Organization of Foster Families,*431 US 816, 831, n 28). Additionally, the petition was untimely (CPLR 217), petitioner-appellant failed to exhaust its administrative remedy of seeking dismissal before the administrative tribunal involved (CPLR 7801 [1]; *see also, Matter of Schuyler v State Univ.,*31 AD2d 273), and petitioner-appellant’s participation in the hearing it sought to enjoin constituted a waiver of any right to seek enjoinder *(see, e.g., Murray v Capozzi,*71 AD2d 786).

As petitioner-appellant has no standing to assert any constitutional rights of respondent natural mother *(see, Pierce v Society of Sisters,*268 US 510), petitioner-appellant’s contention that its concern for the alleged right of the natural mother to receive notice of the subject hearing justifies its petition, fails.

We also find no merit to petitioner-appellant’s argument that respondents New York City Department of Social Services and the natural mother should share in payment of any attorneys’ fees awarded herein to respondents Warren and *192Theresa Dade. The Department and the natural mother are not named petitioners, and the only papers filed by them in this matter are their respective Answers to the petition herein, filed by them as named respondents and setting forth their respective positions on the issues which, it is noted, are not opposed in theory to that of petitioner-appellant. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Asch and Smith, JJ.
_______________________________________ __ _____________ _______________ _____________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133924 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. DOUGLAS SHANES, Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Marcella Shanes, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133924 COA: 264651 Jackson CC: 02-000044-NH SHAHZAD A. SHAIKH, M.D. and W. A. FOOTE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendants,

and

DR. JAVAID BASHIR and NAVEED SIDDIQI, M.D., Defendants-Appellees,

and

DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF JACKSON and DR. LOWELL FISHER, Defendants-Appellants.

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Braverman v Garden City Hosp (Docket Nos. 134445-1 34446) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolv e an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.

l1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1













CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Peter Toscano, Chief Executive Officer, of International Power Group, Ltd. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on 10Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 15, 2008



/s/Peter Toscano

Peter Toscano

(Principal Executive Officer)
5

- 44



### Table 5.4

. 1 Typical Manufacturer’s Material Prices for Liqu id -Immersed Design Lines

Material Units 2010 Price 2010$ Min.

Price (2006

– 25%) 2010$ Max.

Price (2008

+ 25%) 2010$ 2010 2010$ 2009 2010$ 2008 2010$ 2007 2010$ 2006 2010$

M6 core steel $/lb $ 1.46 $ 0.94 $

2.19 $ 1.46 $ 1.64 $ 1.75 $ 1.58 $ 1.26 M5 core steel $/lb $ 1.51 $ 0.99 $

2.24 $ 1.51 $ 1.67 $ 1.79 $ 1.61 $ 1.32 M4 core steel $/lb $ 1.59 $

1.03 $ 2.30 $ 1.59 $ 1.70 $ 1.84 $ 1.64 $ 1.38 M3 core steel $/lb $ 1.88 $

1.06 $ 2.60 $ 1.88 $ 1.96 $ 2.08 $ 1.70 $ 1.41 M3 core steel (Lite Carlite) $/lb $ 1.95 $

1.47 $ 2.44 $ 1.95 $

- $

- $

- $

- M2 core steel $/lb $ 2.00 $

1.32 $ 2.79 $ 2.00 $ 2.01 $ 2.23 $ 2.18 $ 1.76 M2 core steel (Lite Carlite) $/lb $ 2.10 $

1.58 $ 2.63 $ 2.10 $

- $

- $

- $

- ZDMH (mechanically

scribed core steel) $/lb $ 2.05 $

1.41 $ 3.22 $ 2.05 $ 2.02 $ 2.57 $ 2.29 $ 1.88 SA1 (amorphous) finished core, volume production $/lb $ 2.38 $

1.72 $ 3.64 $ 2.38 $ 2.29 $ 2.91 $

- $

- Copper wire, formvar, round #10

- 20 $/lb $ 4.87 $

3.33 $

5.97 $ 4.87 $ 3.81 $ 4.77 $ 4.78 $ 4.44 Copper wire, enameled, round #7

- 10 $/lb $ 4.84 $

3.31 $

5.93 $ 4.84 $ 3.78 $ 4.74 $ 4.75 $ 4.41 Copper wire, enameled, rectangular sizes $/lb $ 4.97 $

3.41 $

6.09 $ 4.97 $ 3.91 $ 4.87 $ 4.88 $ 4.54 Aluminum wire, formvar, round #9

- 17 $/lb $ 3.07 $

2.30 $

3.91 $ 3.07 $ 3.00 $ 3.13 $ 3.08 $ 3.07 Aluminum wire, formvar, round #7

- 10 $/lb $ 2.57 $

1.93 $ 3.28 $ 2.57 $ 2.50 $ 2.63 $ 2.58 $ 2.57 Copper strip, thickness range 0.02

- 0.045 $/lb $ 4.97 $

3.41 $

6.09 $ 4.97 $ 3.91 $ 4.87 $ 4.88 $ 4.54 Copper strip, thickness range 0.030

- 0.060 $/lb $ 4.97 $

3.41 $

6.09 $ 4.97 $ 3.91 $ 4.87 $ 4.88 $ 4.54 Aluminum strip, thickness range 0.02

- 0.045 $/lb $ 2.08 $

1.56 $ 2.67 $ 2.08 $ 2.01 $ 2.14 $ 2.09 $ 2.08 Aluminum strip, thickness range 0.045

- 0.080 $/lb $ 2.08 $

1.56 $ 2.67 $ 2.08 $ 2.01 $ 2.14 $ 2.09 $ 2.08 Kraft insulating paper with diamond adhesive $/lb $ 1.52 $

1.17 $

1.93 $ 1.52 $ 1.54 $ 1.54 $ 1.56 $ 1.56 Mineral oil $/gal $ 3.35 $

1.94 $ 3.84 $ 3.35 $ 2.89 $ 3.07 $ 2.51 $ 2.59 Tank Steel $/lb $ 0.38 $

0.32 $

0.60 $ 0.38 $ 0.39 $ 0.48 $ 0.43 $ 0.43



### DOE then marked up the raw material prices presented in Table 5.4

. 1 using the manufacturer‘s internal markups discussed in section 5.4.1

. DOE used the marked-up material prices as inputs to the transformer design software for optimization, even though the material prices do not receive the markup during DOE‘s cost calculation. The cost calculation applies the
,

Copied below is a proposed agenda for tomorrow’s meeting. We’ll see you at 8:45 in the lobby.

M att

Time (ET) Topic

9:00—9:10 Introductions

9:10 — 9:25 NESHAP Reconsideration9:25 — 9:30 NSPS 1.5 Amendments Schedule

9:30 — 10:30 Control Technique Guidelines

10:30 — 10:45 BREAK10:45 — 11:20 NSPS 2.0 - Review API technical feedback provided to EPA

11:20 — 11:30 Source Determination11:30 — 12:00 NSPS Electronic Reporting Proposed Rule w EPA’s Gerri Garwood
// 

q

7?’ f4Ezsq

C,f//444c’ V6Ai - ‘r’

-

LAJi LtJYt4S M1. 91 Wi LLIAYtI.

—-r cvc’ _-v.7 ‘.r.

4v1yOttt - LLL.J€dA4) a

‘: .Cz(k,

(\&5 V)(cr

- hLi

JI% Aj(yJ

—

‘r - -—- C I tA- 1-tJ.S j etety “j ‘I

— .44-L-_-_ - ‘ /5./%A —

1’h1 N0’’4

------

—

•

• •‘Q

A Nbr, VhL (f//( 1D/P4

(_C’b’(j

it
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0146 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JUSTIN DOUGLAS DAY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 6, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 30 2021

07/30/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0146