alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 14272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5838]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 558


New Animal Drugs for Use in Animal Feeds

CFR Correction

    In Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 500 to 599, 
revised as of April 1, 2011, on page 490, in Sec.  558.500, (e)(1)(i) 
is reinstated to read as follows;


Sec.  558.500  Ractopamine.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Combination in grams/
    Ractopamine in grams/ton               ton             Indications for use        Limitations       Sponsor
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) 4.5 to 9....................  ....................  For increased rate of     Feed continuously       000986
                                                         weight gain, improved     as sole ration.
                                                         feed efficiency, and
                                                         increased carcass
                                                         leanness in finishing
                                                         swine, weighing not
                                                         less than 150 lbs, fed
                                                         a complete ration
                                                         containing at least 16%
                                                         crude protein for the
                                                         last 45 to 90 lbs of
                                                         gain prior to slaughter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-5838 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Ryans, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), rendered June 5, 1989, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v*
      *873
      *Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Brown, Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1761 

To provide an extension of the low-income housing credit placed-in-service 

date requirement for certain disaster areas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 7, 2009 

Ms. LANDRIEU (for herself and Mr. VITTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide an extension of the low-income housing credit 

placed-in-service date requirement for certain disaster areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LOW-INCOME HOUSING CREDIT 

4 RULES FOR CERTAIN DISASTER AREAS. 

5 Section 1400N(c)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

6 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘January 1, 2011’’ and in7 serting ‘‘January 1, 2012’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, James B. Hersch, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Century Petroleum Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls
and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based
on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report
any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of
internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: June 9, 2008

/s/ James B. HerschJames B. Hersch, President
and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Safety Products Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A. Peterson, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated:  November 8, 2007 | By:    | /s/ ROBERT  A. PETERSON                          |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Robert A.  Peterson                              |
|                     |   | President,  Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|                     |   | (Principal  Executive Officer)                   |

 

**A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will beretained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
#### Warren G. Wilson, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered February 9, 1990, which granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In the underlying action, plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injuries he sustained on June 16, 1984 as a *277passenger in a taxicab driven by defendant George Addison, an off-duty New York City Police Officer, when the vehicle crashed into a construction site after defendant Addison had exited the vehicle in an effort to apprehend two individuals attempting to break into a parked car.

Upon examination of the record, we find that the IAS court properly dismissed the complaint as against the defendant City and its employee, defendant Addison, as time-barred pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-i where the action against the defendants was concededly not commenced within one year and ninety days after the event upon which the claim was based *(Alifieris v American Airlines,*63 NY2d 370, 374), and where the complaint itself alleged and the record revealed that defendant Addison was, on the date in question, acting within the scope of his employment in his capacity as a member of the New York City Police Department *(Bacalokonstantis v Nichols,*141 AD2d 482, 483).

We have reviewed the plaintiff’s remaining claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Carro, J. P., Milonas, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, David M. Kepler, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Greenville FederalFinancial Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issueras of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date: May 11, 2007 /s/ David M. Kepler   David M. Kepler   President and Chief Executive Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2143 

To extend the duty suspension on Benzoic acid, 3,4,5-trihydroxy-, propyl 

ester. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. CORKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the duty suspension on Benzoic acid, 3,4,5- 

trihydroxy-, propyl ester. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENZOIC ACID, 3,4,5-TRIHYDROXY-, PROPYL 

4 ESTER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.34 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 Benzoic acid, 3,4,5-trihydroxy-, propyl ester) is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2143 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of 

3 this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Awilda Navarro, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kay, J.), rendered May 15, 1989, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
# L_2006199EN.01001701.xml

| 21.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 199/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 199/17

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1122/2006

of 20 July 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 14 to 20 July 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 July 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
#### Rebecca W. Twine, Appellant, v Mercy Hospital et al., Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for alleged medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Shaughnessy, J.), dated December 15, 1989, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it is barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff alleges that an anonymous surgeon who sutured an accidental laceration on the dorsum of her right wrist in July 1986, committed medical malpractice. She did not institute her lawsuit, however, until on or about October 4, 1989. Since an action to recover damages for medical malpractice must be instituted within two years and six months of the occurrence of the malpractice (CPLR 214-a), the plaintiff’s action is time-barred. The statute is not tolled by the plaintiffs lack of knowledge of the physician’s malpractice *(see, Meath v Mishrick,*68 NY2d 992; *cf., Goldsmith v Howmedica, Inc.,*67 NY2d 120). Nor has the plaintiff alleged fraudulent concealment sufficient to invoke the doctrine of equitable estoppel *(cf., Simcuski v Saeli,*44 NY2d 442). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Fiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION

1350 OF CHAPTER
63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cadence
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Cadence) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of Cadence, hereby
certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Cadence.

The undersigned have executed this Certification effective as of
November 5, 2009.



/s/ THEODORE R. SCHROEDERTheodore R. SchroederPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ WILLIAM R. LARUEWilliam R. LaRueSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to
accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cadence,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cadence and will be retained by Cadence and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2088 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2088

      To suspend temporarily the duty on certain capacitor panels 
                specifically designed for wind turbines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on certain capacitor panels 
                specifically designed for wind turbines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CAPACITOR PANELS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR WIND 
              TURBINES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Capacitor panels    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        specifically                                                       31/2011.......
                        designed for wind
                        turbine
                        generators in
                        excess of 2 MW;
                        such panels are
                        specifically
                        designed to
                        optimize the
                        power factor of
                        the asynchronous
                        induction
                        generator in a
                        wind turbine. The
                        capacitor panel
                        is managed by the
                        wind turbine
                        generator
                        controller and
                        has dimensions of
                        2350-2450 mm
                        (length) x 350-
                        450 mm (width) x
                        2200-2350 mm
                        (height)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8537.10.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```