alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006261EN.01001201.xml

| 22.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 261/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 261/12

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1391/2006

of 21 September 2006

on the issue of import licences for rice originating in the least developed countries

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 of 10 December 2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1401/2002 of 31 July 2002 laying down detailed rules for the opening and administration of the tariff quotas for rice, originating in the least developed countries, for the marketing years 2002/2003 to 2008/2009 (2), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 1401/2002 opened a tariff quota for a quantity of 5 062 tonnes of husked rice equivalent for the 2006/2007 marketing year. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 1401/2002 opened a tariff quota for a quantity of 5 062 tonnes of husked rice equivalent for the 2006/2007 marketing year.

| (2) | The quantities in respect of which applications have been submitted exceed the quantities available. It is therefore necessary to set a reduction percentage applicable to the quantities applied for, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The quantities in respect of which applications have been submitted exceed the quantities available. It is therefore necessary to set a reduction percentage applicable to the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For applications for import licences for rice originating in the least developed countries referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001, submitted during the first five working days of September 2006 pursuant to Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1401/2002 and notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 5(1) of the said Regulation licences shall be issued for the quantities given in the applications submitted multiplied by a reduction percentage of 91,80385 %.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 September 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 346, 31.12.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2004 (OJ L 321, 22.10.2004, p. 23).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 203, 1.8.2003, p. 42.

2

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TAL International Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Burns, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
May 6, 2010

/s/ John BurnsJohn Burns Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6083

OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SCOTTY BODIFORD, Jail Administrator individual capacity official capacity; 

MAJOR STOWERS, individual capacity official capacity; JIMMY THOMPSON, 

Mail Room Supervisor individual capacity official capacity; SERGEANT 

BOWMAN, individual capacity official capacity; OFFICER JENNINGS, 

individual capacity official capacity; OFFICER SHOKLLY, individual capacity 

official capacity; OFFICER COLLIER, individual capacity official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

JOSEPH KERNELL, Greenville County Administrator individual capacity official 

capacity; JOHN VANDERMOSTEN, Interim Assistance County Administrator 

individual capacity official capacity; ENNIS FANT, individual capacity official 

capacity; WILLIS MEADOWS, individual capacity official capacity; LYNN 

BALLARD, individual capacity official capacity; JOE DILL, individual capacity 

official capacity; BUTCH KIRVENY, individual capacity official capacity; SID 

CATES, individual capacity official capacity; RICK ROBERT, individual capacity 

official capacity; FRED PAYNE, individual capacity official capacity; 

XANTHENE NORRIS, individual capacity official capacity; LIZ SEMAN, 

individual capacity official capacity; BOB TAYLOR, individual capacity official 

capacity; GREENVILLE COUNTY COUNCIL,

Defendants.
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (6:18-cv-00355-RBH)

Submitted: May 23, 2019 Decided: May 29, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Olandio Ray Workman, Appellant Pro Se. Carly Davis, Russell W. Harter, Jr., 

CHAPMAN, HARTER & HARTER, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Olandio Ray Workman appeals the district court’s orders accepting the 

recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Workman v. Bodiford, 

No. 6:18-cv-00355-RBH (D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2018 & Dec. 28, 2018). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1840 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1840

         To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Linuron.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 22, 2009

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Linuron.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LINURON.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.13.24 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-
methoxy-1-methylurea (Linuron)) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' 
and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
302 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Stefan
A. Bird, certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Salton Sea Funding
      Corporation;2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and5.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  function):a)All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reportingDate:
    February
      25,2005
 
 /s/
Stefan A. Bird
 Stefan A.
Bird
 President
 (chief
executive officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.0

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
<PAGE>
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of BostonFed Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      -     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      -     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


     DATE:  March 15, 2004
                                             /s/ David F. Holland
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             David F. Holland
                                             President, Chief Executive Officer
                                             and Chairman of the Board



     DATE:  March 15, 2004                   /s/ John A. Simas
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             John A. Simas
                                             Executive Vice President,
                                             Chief Financial Officer and
                                             Secretary










A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to BostonFed Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by BostonFed Bancorp,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 22-40372 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee , versus Jorge Villarreal-Gonzalez, Defendant—Appellant . ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:21-CR-2289-1

______________________________ Before Smith, Dennis, and Southwick, Circuit Judges . Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appoin ted to represent Jorge VillarrealGonzalez has moved for leave to withdr aw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villarreal-G onzalez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and th e relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 28, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-40372 Document: 00516591668 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/28/2022No. 22-40372

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appe llate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED . See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 22-40372 Document: 00516591668 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/28/2022
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 3, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ WILLIAM L. BALLHAUSWilliam L. BallhausPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 12, 2008
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS NO. AP -76,053
EXP AR TE JA SON SCO TT M AY , A pplic ant
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 21646-AIN THE 42 DISTRICT COURT ND F RO M TA YL OR

CO UN TY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas C o d e o f C ri minal Procedure , the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 4 1 8 S
. W
. 2 d 8 24, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted of forg ery and sentenc ed to two y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. Ap p l i c an t p l e a d e d g u i l ty o n O c t o b e r 2 6 , 2 0 0 6 , an d r e c e i v e d 1 3 5 d ay s o f p r e - s e n t e n c e ja il ti me . O nJanu ar

y 3 1 , 2 0 0 7 , h e w a s e r

r o n e o u s ly r e le a s e d o nma n d a to r y s u p e r vision i n absentia on
an unre lated convic tion f

or assault. Instead of being rele ased, he should have be en tra nsfer red to a state jail fac ility . Pursuant to a pre mature- rele ase w arr ant, he wa s re t u rn ed to Tay lor County on2

November

28, 2007. He wa s not credited w ith nine months an d t we n t y -seve n day s he spent on rele ase, a nd as a result, his discha

rg e date was extended to April 7, 2009. He now c ontends that he is being illega lly

confine d beca

use he w as not cre dited with this t ime. Ba sed on an a ffidavit submitted by the Texas Depa

rtment of Criminal J ustice–Classification and Rec ords, the trial c ourt concluded that Applicant wa s not being illega lly confine d and
rec ommended that we deny relief . We believe that Applica nt is en t i t l ed to the time he spent on
re le a se . A c c or din g ly , th e Te xas D e pa rtme nt o f C ri min a l Just ic e –St a te Jail Di visio n sh all c re dit Appl i ca n t ’s s entenc e in ca use number 21646- A from the 42 J udicial District Court of Tay lor nd County with the nine months and twenty -seve n day s he spent on re lease
.

Deliver ed: Dec ember

10, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9645-5]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the next meeting of the Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) will be held March 28 and 29 at Mount Vernon Place, 900 Massachusetts Avenue, Washington, DC. The CHPAC was created to advise the Environmental Protection Agency on science, regulations, and other issues relating to children's environmental health.

# DATES:

The Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee will meet March 28 and 29, 2012.

# ADDRESSES:

Mount Vernon Place, 900 Massachusetts Avenue, Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Martha Berger, Office of Children's Health Protection, USEPA, MC 1107T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 564-2191,                         *berger.martha@epa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The meetings of the CHPAC are open to the public. No registration is required. Preliminary agenda includes discussion of an advice letters on lead regulations, social determinants of health and children's environmental health, and EPA's Risk Assessment Forum and children's health projects. The full agenda will be posted at                     *www.epa.gov/​children.*

*Access:*                     For information on access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact Martha Berger at 202-564-2191 or                     *berger.martha@epa.gov.*

Dated: February 21, 2012.

Martha Berger,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 2012-5881 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

February 5, 2015 Session Heard at Nashville

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RICCO R. WILLIAMS

Appeal by Permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals

Circuit Court for Lauderdale County

No. 8856 Joe H. Walker III, Judge

_____________________________

No. W2013-01897-SC-R11-CD – Filed July 14, 2015

_____________________________

GARY R. WADE, J., dissenting.

A majority of this Court has determined that when a defendant is charged with the 

offenses of kidnapping and robbery as to different victims during a single criminal 

episode, the jury is not entitled to an instruction, pursuant to State v. White, 362 S.W.3d 

559 (Tenn. 2012), that in order to convict on the kidnapping charge it must first 

determine whether the removal or confinement of the kidnapping victim is “essentially 

incidental” to the contemporaneous robbery of another victim. Because I cannot agree 

with my colleagues that the White instruction is never applicable to these circumstances, 

for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion filed today in State v. Teats, No. M2012-

01232-SC-R11-CD, I must respectfully dissent.

As in Teats, the proof in this case is subject to different interpretations. On one 

hand, a rational juror might conclude that the Defendant and his two accomplices 

intended only to rob Mr. and Mrs. Currie, and that any removal or confinement of their 

three children was in furtherance of that goal, making it essentially incidental to the 

robberies. On the other hand, the evidence could support a finding that the removal or 

confinement of the children went beyond that necessary to accomplish the robberies. 

Because the proof could be interpreted in different ways, I would reverse each of the 

Defendant’s remaining convictions for especially aggravated kidnapping and remand for 

a properly instructed jury to determine whether there was a removal or confinement of 

the three children that was not essentially incidental to the robberies of Mr. and Mrs. 

Currie. See State v. Cecil, 409 S.W.3d 599, 612-13 (Tenn. 2013) (remanding for a new 

trial because the question of whether the removal or confinement of a victim is essentially 

incidental to an accompanying offense is one for the jury to decide as a matter of fact).

_________________________________

 GARY R. WADE, JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 27, 2020 a0323

Order 

Clerk

March 27, 2020

160009

FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY,

Subrogee of JEFF FURNESS, FREDRIC

WILSON, KENNY MALBURG’S

LANDSCAPING, INC., and TIMOTHY

DEMARAY, and PIONEER MUTUAL

INSURANCE COMPANY, Subrogee of JAY D. 

FERGUSON, AMANDA FERGUSON, D & R

HENNE FARMS, INC., and DOROTHY

WALTON and LYNN WALTON, d/b/a 

WALTON FARMS, and HASTINGS MUTUAL

INSURANCE COMPANY, Subrogee of JAMES

T. YOUNG, SHELLY YOUNG, MARVIN HILL,

LOIS HILL, CLIFFORD C. KESSLER, and

SHIRLEY KESSLER,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 160009

COA: 343307

Sanilac CC: 16-036858-NZ

TNT EQUIPMENT, INC.,

Defendant,

and

EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY 

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 20, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.