alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORY GOODS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 20

- 15365

D.C. No. 2:18

- cv

- 00732

- JAM

- EFB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Gregory Goods appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force

and deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs . We have jurisdi ction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Gregg v. Haw. Dep’t of Pub. Safety

,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 15365

870 F.3d 883, 886 (9th Cir. 2017) (dismissal as time

- barred); Resnick v. Hayes

,

213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A). We

affirm

.

The d istrict court properly dismissed Goods’ s action because Goods failed to

file his action within the two

- year statute of limitations or establish an y basis for

tolling. See Wallace v. Kato , 549 U.S. 384, 387, 394 ( 2007 ) (federal courts in

§ 1983 actions apply the state statute of limitations and borrow applicable tolling

provisions from state law) ; see also Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § § 335.1 , 352.1, 352(a)

( setting forth two

- year statute of limitations for personal injury claims, a two

- year

maximum statutory tolling due to imprisonment, and the availability of tolling for

mental incapacity ); Cervantes v. City of San Diego , 5 F.3d 1273, 127 5

- 1277 ( 9th

Cir. 1993) ( stating California’s three

- pronged test for equitable t olling and

explaining that dismissal may be appropriate when it is evident from the face of the

complaint that equitable tolling is unavailable as a matter of law )

.

AFFIRMED

.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                          FORM 10-K/A


     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
           For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997


Purpose:  To supplement in part Part IV, Item 14(c) of Company's
          previously filed Form 10-K in order to file as an exhibit
          the Annual Servicing Report of Company's Independent
          Public Accountants. 


                  Commission File Nos. 0-28110


              HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN TRUST 1995-1 
     (Exact name of Registrant as specified in Department
      of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4)

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
(Administrator of the Trust)
(Exact name as specified in Administrator's charter)


            DELAWARE                      36-3670374             
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification
incorporation of Administrator)   Number of Registrant


 2700 SANDERS ROAD, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS         60070     
(Address of principal executive offices of           (Zip Code)
Administrator)


Administrator's telephone number, including area code(847)564-5000












<PAGE>













                           SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Administrator has duly caused
this amendment to be signed on behalf of the Household Consumer
Loan Trust 1995-1 by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




                             HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                         as Administrator of and on behalf of the

                           HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN TRUST 1995-1
                                    (Registrant)




Date:  April 3, 1998          By:/s/John W. Blenke              
                                 John W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary



















<PAGE>







                          Exhibit Index


Exhibit No.    Exhibit                                      Page
No.

99             Copy of Independent Public Accountants          4
               Annual Servicing Report dated March 26, 1998.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ WORD TO INFO, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
FACEBOOK INC., Defendant

- Appellee

______________________
2017

- 1431

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:15

- cv

- 03485

- WHO, Judge William H. Orrick
, III.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
M ICHAEL D. S AUNDERS , Farney Daniels, PC, San Mateo, CA, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also repr esented by J ONATHAN D ANIEL B AKER ; S TEVEN R. D ANIELS , W ILLIAM B RYAN F ARNEY , Georgetown, TX

.
H EIDI L YN K EEFE , Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represented by L OWELL D. M EAD , M ARK R. W EINSTEIN

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (M OORE , C HEN , and S TOLL , Cir cuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

November 8, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13390-13391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5408]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Veterans' Rural Health Advisory Committee, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Veterans' Rural 
Health Advisory Committee will hold a meeting on March 29-30, 2012, at 
the Conference

[[Page 13391]]

Center at the Community Health Development, Inc., 201 South Evans 
Street, Uvalde, Texas, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. each day. The meeting is 
open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on health care issues affecting enrolled Veterans residing in 
rural areas. The Committee examines programs and policies that impact 
the provision of VA health care to enrolled Veterans residing in rural 
areas, and discusses ways to improve and enhance VA services for these 
Veterans.
    In the morning of March 29, the Committee will hear from its 
Chairman; the Veterans Integrated Systems Network 17 Director; and the 
Chief Executive Officer of the Community Health Development, Inc. In 
the afternoon, the Committee will receive overviews of the San Antonio 
Healthcare Delivery System and the Texas Veterans Commission. The 
Committee will also receive briefings on improving access in rural 
health and hear from the Director of the Office of Rural Health (ORH).
    In the morning of March 30, the Committee will hear opening remarks 
from its Chairman; receive briefings on the South Texas Veterans Health 
Care Telehealth Program, the Homeless Women Veterans Program, and the 
ORH National Outreach Tool Kit; and hear from the County Veterans 
Service Officer. In the afternoon, the Committee will discuss its 
annual report and fall meeting. Public comments will be received at 
3:30 p.m.
    Individuals who speak are invited to submit a 1-2 page summary of 
their comments for inclusion in the official meeting record. Members of 
the public may also submit written statements for the Committee's 
review to Ms. Judy Bowie, Designated Federal Officer, ORH (10P1R), 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20420, or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c1e191e0d004204090d0018044205021d19051e152c1a0d420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aad8dfd8cbc684c2cfcbc6dec284c3c4dbdfc3d8d3eadccb84cdc5dc">[email protected]</span></a>. Any member of the 
public seeking additional information should contact Ms. Bowie at (202) 
461-1929.

    Dated: March 1, 2012.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Vivian Drake,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-5408 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# L_2006330EN.01003001.xml

| 28.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 330/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 330/30

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 20 November 2006

extending to the non-participating Member States the application of Decision 2006/849/EC amending and extending Decision 2001/923/EC establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the Pericles programme)

(2006/850/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 308 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | When adopting Decision 2006/849/EC (1) the Council indicated that it should apply in the participating Member States as defined in the first indent of Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 974/98 of 3 May 1998 on the introduction of the euro (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

When adopting Decision 2006/849/EC (1) the Council indicated that it should apply in the participating Member States as defined in the first indent of Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 974/98 of 3 May 1998 on the introduction of the euro (2).

| (2) | However, the exchange of information and staff and the assistance and training measures implemented under the Pericles programme should be uniform throughout the Community and the requisite steps should therefore be taken to guarantee the same level of protection for the euro in the Member States where the euro is not the official currency, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

However, the exchange of information and staff and the assistance and training measures implemented under the Pericles programme should be uniform throughout the Community and the requisite steps should therefore be taken to guarantee the same level of protection for the euro in the Member States where the euro is not the official currency,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The application of Decision 2006/849/EC shall be extended to Member States other than the participating Member States as defined in the first indent of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 974/1998.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 20 November 2006.

For the Council

The President

J. KORKEAOJA

---

(1)  See page 28 of this Official Journal.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 139, 11.5.1998, p. 1.

2

---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1987 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain aluminum vacuum mugs with 

lids. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain aluminum 

vacuum mugs with lids. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ALUMINUM VACUUM MUGS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Aluminum vacuum mugs with 

lid, a capacity not exceeding 

1 liter and USB plug-in capability to warm the contents 

(provided for in subheading 

9617.00.10) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1987 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
#### City of New York, Respondent, v Grosfeld Realty Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Grosfeld Realty Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), dated July 14, 1989, which, *inter alia,*granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment dismissing its affirmative defenses and counterclaims and (2) a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court dated November 30, 1989.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see, Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised an appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

It is well settled that once a prima facie case has been made out, as it was here, in order to defeat a motion for summary judgment the opponent "must produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to require a trial of material questions of fact * * * or must demonstrate [an] acceptable excuse for his failure to meet the requirement of tender in admissible form” *(Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562). General allegations, merely conclusory and unsupported by competent evidence, are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment *(see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324). Upon review of the appellant’s papers in opposition to the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, we find the affidavits set forth mere conclusions concerning alleged oral representations to forego foreclosure, rather than a statement of detailed factual allegations along with other documentary evidence which is required to defeat such a motion *(see,*
      *437
      *Nassau Trust Co. v Montrose Concrete Prods. Corp.,*56 NY2d 175; *Flintkote Co. v Bert Bar Holding Corp.,*114 AD2d 400; *New York State Urban Dev. Corp. v Garvey Brownstone Houses,*98 AD2d 767, 771).

We also find the appellant’s bare and unsubstantiated assertion that the plaintiff made certain assurances thereby waiving indefinitely its right pursuant to the mortgage to foreclose on the property, contradicts the express terms of the mortgage and is insufficient to create an issue of fact which would warrant a trial *(see, Nassau Trust Co. v Montrose Concrete Prods. Corp., supra; Johnson v Gaughan,*128 AD2d 756, 757; *Flintkote Co. v Bert Bar Holding Corp., supra; New York State Loan Mtge. Enforcement & Admin. Corp. v Coney Is. Site Five Houses,*109 AD2d 311, 316; *New York State Urban Dev. Corp. v Garvey Brownstone Houses, supra).*

We note with disfavor the attempt on the part of the appellant’s attorneys to submit on this appeal an affidavit specifically rejected by the Supreme Court and, therefore, not properly part of the record on this matter. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1907 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain leather upper sports footwear. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. ROBERTS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain leather upper 

sports footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN LEATHER UPPER SPORTS FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1907 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Tennis shoes, basketball 

shoes, gym shoes, training 

shoes and the like, with outer 

soles of rubber, plastic, leather or composition leather with 

uppers of leather (other than 

with uppers of pigskin), not 

covering the ankle, the foregoing for youths and boys 

(provided for in subheading 

6403.99.60) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Board of Directors and Stockholders
Schein Pharmaceutical, Inc.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-49827
and 333-79779) dated April 9, 1998 and June 2, 1999, respectively, of our
reports dated February 16, 2000 (except for Note 20 which is as of March 31,
2000) relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Schein
Pharmaceutical, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 25, 1999.

We also consent to the reference to us under the caption "Experts" in the
Prospectus.

/s/  BDO Seidman, LLP

BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

New York, New York
April 6, 2000
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Voice Holding Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q (the “Report”), for the nine month period ending March
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, each of the undersigned Officers of the Company does hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




May 15,
2009                                                                                                /s/ Bill
Burbank




Bill Burbank




Chief Executive Officer









May 15,
2009                                                                                                /s/ D. Ronald
Allen




D. Ronald Allen




Chief Financial Officer




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the




act
and is not being filed as part of the report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 1, 2013

t0325

Order 

April 1, 2013

146508

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146508

COA: 309450 

Eaton CC: 09-020404-FH

NANCY ANN ASHENHURST-GALLINA,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# L_2006179EN.01005501.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 179/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 179/55

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 27 June 2006

appointing the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union

(2006/451/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28(1) thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 207 thereof,

Recalling Council Decision 2001/79/CFSP of 22 January 2001 setting up the Military Committee of the European Union (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 3 of Decision 2001/79/CFSP, the Chairman of the Military Committee is to be appointed by the Council on the recommendation of the Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 3 of Decision 2001/79/CFSP, the Chairman of the Military Committee is to be appointed by the Council on the recommendation of the Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence.

| (2) | At its meeting on 11 May 2006, the Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence recommended that General Henri BENTÉGEAT be appointed Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

At its meeting on 11 May 2006, the Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence recommended that General Henri BENTÉGEAT be appointed Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union,

HEREBY DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

General Henri BENTÉGEAT is appointed Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union for a period of three years as from 6 November 2006.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 27 June 2006.

For the Council

The President

J. PRÖLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 27, 30.1.2001, p. 4.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Triple Crown Media, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his individual knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|        |  |                                                     
|------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date:   |  | November 19, 2007                                   
|        | 
|Signed: |  | /s/ MARK G. MEIKLE                                  
|        |  | Mark G. Meikle                                      
|        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, regardless of any general incorporation language in said filing.