### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 20617
DO N N A J AREN SDO RF P l a i n ti ff-A p p ell a n t v. M A R KE V E R S O N , i n hi s i n di vi du alan d of f i ci alcapaci t y as C om m i ssi on er of t he I nt er nalR eve nue Ser vi c e; K E V I N B R O W N , I n hi s i ndi vi dualand of f i c i al c apac i t y as C om m i ss i onerof t he Sm al lB usi nes s/ Sel f E m pl oye d, I nt er nal R eve nue Ser vi c e; E LL E N D O LB Y , i n heri ndi vi dualand of f i c i alc apac i t y as D i rector , C oll ection A rea , In tern a lR ev en u e S erv i ce; M A R T IN A R N O L D , In hi s i ndivi dua la nd o f f i c i alc ap ac i t y as Te r r i t o r y M ana ge r , I nt e r nalRev e nue Ser vi c e; JA M E S AG I B SO N , I n hi s i ndi vi dualand of f i c i alc apac i t y as M an ager, I n t erna lR even u e Servi ce; ST E P H A N IE C A L IST E R , I n her i n di vi du alan d of

f i ci alcapaci t y as H R Sp eci al i st , E m pl oym en tan d L abor Rel at i o ns , I nt e r nalRev e nue Se r vi c e ; SU E B U RT O N , I n he ri ndivi dua la nd o f f i c i a lc a p a c i t ya s “ On t h e J o b ” I n s t r u c t o r , I n t e r n a lR e v e n u e S e r v i c e ; L I NDA M SP R IN G E R , i n her i n di vi du alan d of f i ci alcapaci t y as D i rect or, U n i t ed St at es O f

f i c e o f Per so nnelM anagem ent ; JO H N D O E S 1- 10 D efen da n t s- A pp el l ees

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e Sou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 4: 07- c v- 2703

B ef ore R E AV L E Y , D AV IS, an d E L R O D , C i rcui tJu dg es . United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 26, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 20617

Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R . 47 .5, th e co urt has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d and is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forthin5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4.

Notwith standing the styl e of the case, Pl aintiff’s original complaint expresslyli mited 1 h ersuitt o th es e de fe n dantsinth eir in dividu al capaciti es . 2 P E R C U R I A M: * Pl ai nt i f f

- A ppel l ant D onna A r ens dor f appeal s t he di st r i c tcour t ’ s di sm i ss al p u r s u a n tt o F e d e r a lR u l e s o f C i v i lP r o c e d u r e 1 2 (b ) ( 2 ) a n d 1 2 (b ) ( 6 ) o f h e rc l a i ms unde rt he Pr i va c y Act o f 19 74 , 4 2 U
. S. C. § § 1 98 5( 3) a nd 1 98 6, a nd B ive n s v . S ix Un kn ow n Nam ed Agents of F ederalB u reau of

Narcot i cs , 4 0 3 U
. S

. 38 8 , 91 S

. C t. 1 9 9 9 (1 9 7 1 ), a g a in s t n u m e r o u s I n te r n a l R e v e n u e S e r v ic e a n d o th e ro ffic ia ls in t h ei r i n di vi du alcapaci t i es. B ased on our de no vo re v ie w o f th e re c o r d , seeI n re 1 K at r i na C analB r e ache s Li t ig. , 4 9 5 F .3d 1 9 1 , 2 0 5 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 7 ); R evel lv. L i d ov , 3 1 7 F .3d 4 6 7 , 4 6 9 (5 th C ir. 2 0 0 2 ), w e c o n clu d e th a t P la in tiff h a s fa il e d to id e n tify
an y errori n t h e di st ri ctcourt ’ s r u l i n g. I n deed , her bri ef w h ol l y fai l s t o add ress t he c o ur t ’ s r e as o ne d b as i s f o rdi s m i s s al , w hi c h we f i nd f ul l y s upp o r t ed by t he g o v e r n in gla w . W e th e r e fo r e a ffir m th e ju d g m e n t o f th e d is tr ic t c o u r t. A F F IR M E D
.