alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2029 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2029

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Menthyl anthranilate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Menthyl anthranilate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MENTHYL ANTHRANILATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.40 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Menthyl anthranilate) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          29,450
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  434,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (10,346)
<INVENTORY>                                     97,582
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               841,375
<PP&E>                                       2,838,228
<DEPRECIATION>                                (613,050)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,166,441
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,015,651
<BONDS>                                        273,889
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,151,614
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,166,441
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,354,048
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,090,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,587
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                268,651
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,867
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            211,784
<DISCONTINUED>                               1,018,805
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,230,589
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2086 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mini component stereo systems. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mini component 

stereo systems. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MINI COMPONENT STEREO SYSTEMS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 (2009 HTS # 8527.91.5000) 

mini stereo system with 5- 

disc multiplay changer, AM/ 

FM tuner, docking station, 

250W total power, dual cassette decks, 2-way speaker 

system, etc. ............................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2086 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             |  |                                                                     
|---------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:    September 28, 2004 |  | /s/ Martin A. Lynch                                                 
|                             |  | Martin A. Lynch Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



| | Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and will be retained by Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# L_2006099EN.01001801.xml

| 7.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 99/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 99/18

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 571/2006

of 6 April 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 31 March to 6 April 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 7 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 April 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2063 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of 2-[4-[(2-hydroxy-3- 

dodecyloxypropl)oxy]-2-hydroxphenyl]-4,6-bis(2,4-dimethylphenyl)-1,3,5- 

triazine and 2-[4-[(2-hydroxy-3-tridecyloxypropyl)oxy]-2-hydroxyphenyl]- 

4,6-bis(2,4-dimethylphenyl)-1,3,5-triazine in propylene glycol monomethyl 

ether. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of 2-[4-[(2- 

hydroxy-3-dodecyloxypropl)oxy]-2-hydroxphenyl]-4,6- 

bis(2,4-dimethylphenyl)-1,3,5-triazine and 2-[4-[(2-hydroxy-3-tridecyloxypropyl)oxy]-2-hydroxyphenyl]-4,6- 

bis(2,4-dimethylphenyl)-1,3,5-triazine in propylene glycol 

monomethyl ether. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2063 IS

1 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF 2-[4-[(2-HYDROXY-3- 

2 DODECYLOXYPROPL)OXY]-2- 

3 HYDROXPHENYL]-4,6-BIS(2,4- 

4 DIMETHYLPHENYL)-1,3,5-TRIAZINE AND 2-[4- 

5 [(2-HYDROXY-3-TRIDECYLOXYPROPYL)OXY]-2- 

6 HYDROXYPHENYL]-4,6-BIS(2,4- 

7 DIMETHYLPHENYL)-1,3,5-TRIAZINE IN PRO8 PYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

10 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

11 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

12 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures of 2-[4-[(2-Hydroxy-3-dodecyloxypropl)oxy]- 

2-hydroxphenyl]-4,6-bis(2,4- 

dimethylphenyl)-1,3,5-triazine 

and 2-[4-[(2-Hydroxy-3- 

tridecyloxypropyl)oxy]-2- 

hydroxyphenyl]-4,6-bis(2,4- 

dimethylphenyl)-1,3,5-triazine 

(CAS No. 153519–44–9) in 

propylene glycol monomethyl 

ether (provided for in subheading 3812.30.60) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

15 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
# L_2006200EN.01000601.xml

| 22.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 200/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 200/6

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 11 July 2006

appointing a Spanish full member of the Committee of the Regions

(2006/510/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Spanish Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | A seat as a full member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Francisco José VÁZQUEZ VÁZQUEZ, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A seat as a full member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Francisco José VÁZQUEZ VÁZQUEZ,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Heliodoro GALLEGO CUESTA, Mayor of Palencia, is hereby appointed a full member of the Committee of the Regions in place of Mr Francisco José VÁZQUEZ VÁZQUEZ for the remainder of his term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2006.

For the Council

The President

E. HEINÄLUOMA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eliud Cintron, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Price, J.), rendered on September 9, 1987, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 9 to 18 years, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.
**Exhibit 32****Residential Capital Corporation****Certification of Principal Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial Officer****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Residential CapitalCorporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of theundersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and 2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company./s/ Bruce J. Paradis Bruce J. ParadisChief Executive OfficerNovember 8, 2005/s/ Davee L. Olson Davee L. OlsonChief Financial OfficerNovember 8, 2005
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1935 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain boots constructed 

by hand of natural rubber. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 27, 2009 

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain boots 

constructed by hand of natural rubber. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN BOOTS CONSTRUCTED BY HAND OF 

4 NATURAL RUBBER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.08 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain boots constructed by hand of natural rubber) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2011’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1935 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of China Clean Energy Inc. (the “Company”), does
hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the
“Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.




Date:
November 12, 2009





/s/
      Tai-ming OuTai-ming
      OuChief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)/s/
      Shannon YanShannon
      YanInterim
      Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)
##### 



EXHIBIT 23 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-98440, 33-98444, 33-98442, 33-98446, 333-21799, 333-21795, 333-70599,
333-35812, 333-35814, 333-91490, 333-101280, 333-101284, 333-101881, and
333-109975) on Form S-8 and the registration statement (No. 333-50494) on Form
S-3 of CheckFree Corporation of our report dated September 3, 2004, (which
report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
relating to the Companys change in its method of accounting for goodwill and
other intangible assets to conform with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CheckFree
Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2004. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
September 3, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q/A of Mobetize Corp. for the quarterly period ended

December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Elena

Karamushko, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial

condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations

of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

Date: May 10, 2016

/s/ Elena Karamushko

Elena Karamushko

Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall

not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant

for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not

be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),

irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40614

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

RICHARD WILLIAM KNIGHT ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 379

Filed: February 19, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS I S AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Canyon County. Hon. Renae J. Hoff , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty years, with a minimum period of confinement of ten years , for two counts of lewd conduc t with minor under sixteen; and a concurrent unified sentence of fifteen yeas with five years determinate for one count of sexual abuse of a child under sixteen

, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM
Richard William Knight was found guilty of two counts of lewd conduct with minor
under sixteen, Idaho Code § 18

- 1508 ; and one count of sexual abuse of a child under sixteen

, I.C. § 18

- 1506(b) . The district court sentenced Knight to a unified term of twenty years, with a
minimum period of confinement of ten years for the two counts of lewd conduct with a minor
under sixteen, and a concurrent unified sentence of fifteen years with five years determinate for

the one count of sexual abuse of a child under sixteen

. Knight appeals asserting that the district
court abused its discretion by imposing excessive sentences

.2 Sentencing is a matter for the trial court ’ s discretion. Both our standar d of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Id aho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Knight ’s j udgment of conviction and sentence s are affirmed.