ENTE" "---" 

-t. @ervices 

Pollution Control System Eva•uation and Source En•issiens Testing 

June 15, 2007 

Mr. Cort Peavy 

Environmental Manager 

Jenkins Brick Company 

1228 N. I•cDonough 

Montgomery, Alabama 36104 

Subject: •iACT Testing PM, NC• & HF 

D•FF Etaghouse Stack 

Montgomery, Alabama Facility 

Entec Proposal No.: 27154 

Dear Mr. Peavy, 

Please find attached three (3) copies of the final report for the MACT Testing for 

Particulate Matter, Hydrogen Chloride and Hydrogen Fluoride in the main stack DIFF 

Baghouse performed at your facility in Montgomery, AL on June 5, 2007. 

We appreciate the opportunity to perform this project for you and hope to be of 

assistance to you in the future. If you have any questions please call 205/491-6676. 

Sincerely, 

Entec Services, inc. 

•/"•yn•lpB• a ne 

"---O•e•Manager 

16-D Commerce Avenue Hueytown, Alabama 35023 Phone: (205) 491-6676 Fax (205) 491-6614 

www.entecservices.com 
ENTEC S ices 

Poflution Control System Evaluation and Source Emissions Testing 

Jenkins Brick 

Montgomery, Alabama 

MACT Testing 

Main Stack D•FF 8aghouse 

June 5, 2007 

Entec Project No." 27154 

18-D Commerce Avenue Hueytown, Alabama 35023 Phone: (205) 481-6676 Fax (205) 491-6614 

www.entecservices.com 
Entec Services, Inc, 

16 D Commerce Avenue 

Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Telephone: (205) 491-6676 

Fax: (205) 491-6614 

Results of the June 5, 2007 

MACT Testing on the 

Main Stack DIFF Baghouse Located in 

Montgomery, Alabama 

S u b m itted to: 

Jenkins Brick Company 

1228 N McDonough 

Montgomery, Alabama 36104 

Attention: Mr. Cort Peavy 

Entec Project No. 27154 

Completed By: 

Art Otero 

project Leader 

Report Submitted: June 15, 2007 

Reviewed By: 

Tom Lotz 

Technical Services Manager 

hereby certify to the best of my knowledge all field sampling and laboratory analysis performed 

for this report is authentic and accurate, it has been checked for completeness and accuracy. 
Jenkins Brick 

Table of Contents 

Section Pa_qe No. 

Executive Summary 

Emissions Summary 

Detailed Test Results 

Sampling Procedures 

Location of Test Ports 

•;•t;•u•i 26A Sampling Train 

Field Data Sheets. Main Stack 

Test Run No. 1 

Test Run No. 2 

Test Run No. 3 

Control Room Data 

Test Protocol 

Quality Control I Quality Assurance Procedures 

Field QA I QC Checklist 

Meter Orifice and Temperature Check Sheet. 

Fyrite Standardization Sheet 

Method 5126A Sample Recovery Sheet 

Laboratory Analysis 

Audit Sample Results 

Equipment Calibrations 

Nomenclature and Test Calculations 

1 

2 

3 

7 

11 

12 

13 

14 

17 

20 

23 

25 

28 

33 

34 

36 

39 

40 

44 

48 

59 
Executive Summary 

Entec Services, inc. was retained by Jenkins 8rick Company to perform additional 

MACT testing for particulate matter hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride •n the 

D•FF 8aghouse Stack at the facility located in Montgomery, Alabama. Mr. Art Otero,. 

and Mr. Trent McMahan of Entec Services, inc. conducted the testing on June 5, 2007. 

Representing the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) was Mr. 

Bryan Brumfieid and Mr. Patrick Byrd. Mr. Cort Peavy of Jenkins Brick help coordinate 

the testing with operations. 

ADEM provided audit samples that were supplied to the lab and have been included in 

the laboratory analysis section. All audit samples were verified by ADEM / EPA as 

passing. 

No difficulties were encountered in the field or in the laboratory analysis of the samples 

by Entec Services, Inc. The particulate and HCI / HF emissions test summary on the 

following page gives a detailed summary of each test run compared to the maximum 

emission limits set forth by the Alabama Department of Environmental Management. 

(ADEM). Test results indicate the particulate emissions are below the limits set 

forth by the ADEM Permit No. 209-0011-X006. 


SOURCE OWNER: 

PLANT LOCATION: 

SOURCE(S) NAME(S): 

SOURCE(S) CONDITION: 

SOURCE(S) SHAPE: 

Entec Services, Inc. 

SOURCE OVERVIEW 

Jenkins Brick 

Montgomery, AL 

DIFF Baghouse Stack 

MACT testing with Lime Rate at 60 Lb/Hr 

Circular 

PROBE WASH CHEMICAL: 

SOURCE PERMIT NUMBER: 

TEST PERFORMED: 

ADDITIONAL TEST REQUIREMENTS: 

•EFERENCE METHOD TESTS: 

PROJECT MANAGER 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST PROJECT LEADER 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST ASSISTANT 

OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: 

RULING AGENCY 

RULING AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: 

)ATES TESTS CONDUCTED: 

ENTEC PROJECT NUMBER: 

Acetone 

209-0011-X006 

Particulate and HCI/HF Testing 

BRICK MACT Subpart JJJJJ 

Sample Location EPA Method 1 

Volumetric Flow EPA Method 2 

Molecular Weight EPA Method 3 

Moisture Content EPA Method 4 

Particulate EPA Method 5 

HCI and HF EPA Method 26A 

Mr. Lynn Beane 

Mr. Art Otero 

Mr, Trent McMahan 

Mr. Cort Peavy 

Alabama Department of Environmental Management 

Mr, Bryan BPumfield and Mr, Patrick Byrd 

06/05/07 

27154 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

INPUT TEST DATA 

Client: 

Source: 

Jenkins Brick 

DIFF Baghouse Stack 

Field Data 

Run Number 

Test Date 

Time Test Run Began Ended 

Sampling Time 

!Stack Area 

Barometric Pressure 

Stack Static Pressure 

Pi.tot Tube Correction factor 

Meter Correction Factor 

Meter Delta H @ 

Nozzle Diameter 

Vleter Volume 

Meter Temperature 

Avg. Orifice Delta H 

Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture) 

Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) 

Oxygen Concentration, dry basis 

Carbon Dioxide Concentration, dry basis 

Avg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P 

Stack Temperature 

Total Hydrogen Chloride collected, mg 

Total Hydrogen Fluoride collected, mg 

Total particulate collected 

Job No.: 

Data Input By: 

27154 

Art Otero 

Symbol Units Test Data 

As 

Pbar 

Cp 

Y 

•H@ 

On 

Wimto 

Militaq/Time 

minutes 

in. Hg 

in. H20 

in. 

inches 

dcf 

in. H20 

grams 

grams 

(in. H20) 

F 

CO= 

(sqrt 

HCL mg 

HF mg 

mn 

06/05/07 

0800-0904 

60 

27.494 

29.85 

-0.25 

0.84 

1.004 

1.800 

0.300 

39.861 

85.9 

1.29 

76.9 

10.4 

17.0 

3.0 

0.523 

402.6 

1.8 

0.54 

1.6 

06/05/07 

095O- O54 

60 

27.494 

29.85 

-0.29 

0.84 

1.004 

3 AVERAGE 

06/05/07 

1132-1237 

60 6O 

27.494 

29.85 29.85 

-0.27 

0.84 

1.004 

-0.27 

0.84 

1 .O04 

1.800 1.800 1.800 

0.300 0.300 0.300 

40.086 

mg 

93.6 

1.30 

76.2 

10.0 

16.5. 

3.0 

0.526 

40.214 

100.4 

1.27 

79.4 

9.8 

17.0 

4.0 

0.518 

412.3 

2.2 

0.12 

1.2 

403.7 

1.8 

0.37 

2.0 

40.054 

93.3 

1.29 

77.5 

10.1 

16.8 

3.3 

0.522 

406.2 

1.9 

0.3 

1.6 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueyt•wn. Alabama 35023 

CALCULATED TEST DATA 

Client: Jenkins Brick 

Source: DIFF Baghouse Stack 

Description 

Run Number 

Formulas Symbol 

lest Date 

Time Began-Ended 

1. Stack Pressure P• Pr•113.• 

2. Meter Pressure Pb• •H 113.6 

3. Standard Meter Volume 17.64- Y* (VrJT=)* (P• +/'H 113.6 

4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed 

Cb Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel 

:0.04706"W•,• 

=0.04715"Wm 

5. Moisture Fraction 

9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis 

10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis 

=(V•lszd V•altCd))/(Vwc•sld V•,F•st= 

0.32"(O=)+ 0.44"(CO2)+0.28"(100-(O2)-(CO2)) 

11. Average Stack Gas Velocity 

12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Condilions 

85.49*Cp*(sqrt L•P),,,•*SQRT((T=) (P=*Mw)] 

13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions 

14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions 

14b. Hydrogen Chlodde concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. 

14b. Hydrogen Fluoride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. 

15. Particulate concentration @ Standard Conditions 

=(0.01543*HCL•}/Q=• 

=(0.01543•HF•,•)IQ=d 

=0.01543"m./V•s•d 

15b. Hydrogen Chloride emissions, Ibs per hour =(60/7000)'HCLQ•*Q=I¢ 

=(60/7000)*HFQ=,•*Q=• 15b. Hydrogen Fluoride emissions, Ibs per hour 

21. Particulate emissions 

22. Volume collected through nozzle =T=IP=*[0.002669*V•÷ 

23. Particulate concentration, @ actual conditions =o.01543*m./V. 

.•4. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent 100*Vnl (6l)"v=*A.*(•) 

=ost Meter Orifice Cal. (EMC ALT-009 Yqa) 

% Difference, (Calibration must be within 5% of original Y-factor) 

Ps 

Md 

Ms 

Q= 

HCLcs 

HFcs 

c• 

HCI -Ibslhr 

HF -Ibslhr 

PMR 

V, 

ca 

Units 

Military Time 

in. Hg 

in, Hg 

dscf 

scf 

scf 

fraction 

g/g-mole 

g/g-mole 

•s 

acfm 

d•fm 

grldscf 

gr/dscf 

gr/dscf 

Ibs/hr 

Ibslhr 

acf 

gdacf 

% 

Job NO.: 27154 

Data Input By: Art Otero 

Calculated Data 

06/05107 

0800-0904 

29.83 

06105107 

0950-1054 

29.83 

06/05/07 

1132-1237 

29.83 

AVERAGE 

29.83 

29.94 29.95 29.94 29.94 

38.724 38.404 38.054 38.394 

3.619 3.586 3.737 3.647 

0.490 0.472 0,462 

0.0959 0.0956 0,0994 

0.475 

0.0970 

29.160 29.140 29,320 29.207 

28.089 28.076 28.195 28.120 

38.14 

62,912 

38,380 

38.34 37.89 

62,500 

37,704 

33,958 

63,247 

38,532 

34,698 34,850 

0.001 0.001 0,001 

0.000 0.000 0.000 

0.0006 0.0005 

0.25 

38,121 

0.0008 

62,886 

0.21 0.22 

0.06 0.04 

0.19 0.24 

38,206 

34,502 

0.001 

0.000 

0.0006 

0.23 

0.01 0.04 

0.15 0.19 

70.212 69.698 70.041 69.984 

0.0004 0.0004 0.0003 0.0004 

104.18 102.87 104.62 103.89 

0.9694 0.9761 0.9642 0.9699 

fl.40o/, 

Procedures 

The emission rates were determined using EPA Methods 1 5, and 26A of CFR Title 

40, Part 60, Appendix A. The calibration and quality assurance procedures of EPA 

CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix A for all methods, and the "Quality Assurance Handbook for 

Air Pollution Measurement System" Volume III Stationary Source-Specific Methods 

were followed throughout the duration of the field and laboratory testing. 

The most current version for each method (as described in the Federal Register) was 

used. 

Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Methods 1 and • 

The velocity of the gas stream was determined according to EPA Reference Method 1 

and 2 by reading the instantaneous velocity head with an inclined manometer at each 

sampling point with a calibrated S-type pitot tube attached adjacent to the sample 

nozzle. The stack pressure was measured with the static side of an S-type pitot tube. 

A calibrated pyrometer was used to measure stack temperature at each sampling point. 

The stack was tested for cyclonic flow according to EPA Reference Method 1. 

Stack Gas Molecular Weiqht Method 3 

The carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations were determined using EPA Reference 

Method 3 (Fyrite Method). A sample of the flue gas was extracted from the gas stream 

during each test. These samples were analyzed with a Fyrite gas analyzer. The 

molecular weight of the gas was calculated using the moisture, oxygen and carbon 

dioxide content and the measured stack gas temperature. 

Moisture Content Method 4 

The moisture content used for calculating the gas stream flow rate was determined by 

measuring the amount of condensed moisture in the glass impingers and silica gel 

impinger in the sampling train as described in EPA Reference Method 4 at the 

completion of each test. 

Hvdro_clen Chloride / Hydrogen Fluoride with Particulate Method 5126A 

Preliminary data was used to determine stack temperature, pressure, and range of 

velocity heads, moisture content and stack gas dry molecular weight prior to sampling. 
The meter box was leak ch•cked from the pump to the orifice. Initial and final leak 

checks of the sampling system and pitot lines were performed as outlined in Method 5 

and were recorded on the data sheets. The nozzle (glass or Teflon with an angle of 

taper of 30 degrees and of button hook design) was calibrated before and after the test 

using a micrometer and was also recorded on the data sheets. 

The sampling probe was placed at each sampling point to provide a total sampling time 

of at least 60 minutes and a volume of at least 31.8 cubic feet. The gases were drawn 

through a teflon nozzle attached to a heated glass lined probe. The gases then 

proceeded through borosilicate glass filter holder, with a Teflon frit filter support through 

a tarred Teflon filter to remove particulate matter. The exit of the filter will be maintained at a temperature of greater than 248 0 F. These temperatures were recorded at 

each point on the data sheets. 

The gases were then scrubbed through a series of four impingers (optional impinger not 

included) to capture hydrogen halides and halogens and moisture. The first and 

second impingers contained approximately 100 ml of a 0.1N H2SO4 solution and the 

third and fourth impingers contained approximately 100 ml of a 0.1 N NaOH solution. 

The fifth impinger contained approximately 250 grams of pre-weighed silica gel to 

remove any remaining moisture. The gases passed through the impinger series in an 

ice bath to maintain a maximum exit temperature of 68 0 F. This temperature was 

recorded on the data sheets. The clean and cool gases then entered the meter box 

where the gas flow and temperature were measured. 

After the completion of the test leak rate determinations were made. Then the sampling 

train and the probe nozzle assembly was transferred to the cleanup area making sure 

no particulate was lost. The cleanup data was recorded. 

Particulate catches were placed in sealed petri dishes. Each acetone rinse from the 

nozzle, probe, and filter holder was combined and placed in a sealed container. For the 

group of tests an acetone blank of approximately 200 milliliters was placed in a sealed 

container. The first and second impinger contents were weighed and then transferred 

to its recove,•" container with the rinsing from the connecting glassware were added to 

this container. The third and fourth contents were weighed and the contents discarded. 
Ihe-silica-gel-from-the•fifth-impinger-was-weig•hed•-A-btar•k-ef-the-sulfu •ic-acid--sotution 

and acetone was taken. These containers were clearly marked and transported to the 

laboratory for analysis. The laboratory we used was Stillbrook Analytical. 
Entec Services, Inc 

16 D Commerce Ave. Hueytown AL 35023 

STACK DRAWING & TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION 

Client: Jenkins Brick Job No. 27154 

Soume: DIFF Baghouse Stack Input By: Art Otero 

Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate (P): p Port Type Flange Port Diameter 6.0" 

Stack Diameter, inches: 7t Stack Area, FtZ: 27.494 

Stack Height, feet: 60 Number of Ports: 2 

Stack Properties: Inches Duct Diameters Length of Port, inches: 10.50 

Upstream Disturbance: 156.0 2.20 Total Number of Traverse Points: 12 

Downstream Disturbance: 504.0 7.10 Number of Points per diameter: 6 

71.0 INCHES 

Point N(• 

Inside Stack Outside Nipple 

Inches Inches 

1 3.t 13.6 

2 10.4 20.9 

3 21.0 31.5 

4 60.0 60.5 

NCHES 5 60.6 71.1 

6 67.9 78.4 

Adjustsd points diameter • 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch 

Adjusted points diameter _< 24" no point closer than 0.6 inch 

Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 

4 points per port if the 8 2 diameters downstream and 

upstream criteria is meL 

INCHES 

11 
Method 5/26A Sam ling Train 

Filter Exit Temperature 

(>248 F) 

Sensors ,iiiiiiiiiiiiiil •£•'• I aping 

03 

•).IN 

•aOt 

npmg• 

#4 

•250 

liea (3 

Impinger Exit Temperature 

(<68 F) 

¢ 

Ice Bath 

Exhaust OOOOO0 

Temp. and Flow 

Controllers 

Temperature ][ Manometer 

Dry Gas Meter 
jenkins brick & tile 

POST OFFICE BOX 91 MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101 

PHONE: (334) 834-2210 

FAX-" (334) 241-0787 

1-800-USE-BRICK (834-2745) 

Brian Sims 

vice President Manufacturing 

January 20, 2011 

Mr. Jeffrey Telander 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Re: Requirement to provide information according to Title 42 of the United States Code, 

Chapter 85, S ubchapter I, Part A, section 7414 (42 U.S.C. 7414) 

Dear Mr. Telander: 

Enclosed with this letter are the complete stack test reports for our facilities in 

Montgomery and Brompton, Alabama. After our conversation yesterday, ! reviewed 

these reports and found a mistake in the June 7, 2007, report for the Montgomery Plant 

and in the February 21, 2008, report for the Jordan Plant. I made notes within the reports 

explaining these errors. In both cases, the errors were in the data regarding the plant 

production rates during these tests. For the Montgomery Plant, both kilns exhaust into 

one DIFF. During the tests, both kilns were running at full speed (29 cars per day, each; 

total of 58 cars/day); however, the production rate was calculated as if only one kiln was 

operating. For the Jordan Plant test dated 2/21/08, the tons per hour of fired brick was 

miscalculated because the "green" weight of the brick was reported to the testing 

contractor instead of the fired brick weight. For this report, I have included a copy of our 

Manufacturing Daily Operating Report for the month of February 2008, which shows the 

average daily fired weight of the brick on each day of the month. Explanatory notations 

have been made on the "Emissions Summary" page at the beginning of these reports and 

corrected sheets have been included. 

Thank you again for your help during these difficult times. Please call me on my 

cell phone (334-657-2351) if there is anything else I can do to help you in this project. 

Sin 

• •ely 

----__ 

• 

V.P.-Manufacturing 
ENTEC Services 

Poflution Control System Evaluation and Source Emissions Tasting 

Jenkins Brick 

Montgomery, Alabama 

MACT Testing 

Main Stack DIFF Baghouse 

June 5, 2007 

Entec Project No.: 27154 

16-D Commerce Avenue Hueytown, Alabama 35023 Phone: (205) 491-6676 Fax (205) 491-6614 

www.entecservices.com 
Entec Services, Inc. 

16 D Commerce Avenue 

Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Telephone: (205) 491-8676 

Fax: (205) 491-6614 

Results of the June 5, 2007 

MACT Testing on the 

Main Stack DIFF Baghouse Located in 

Montgomery, Alabama 

ADEM Permit No. 209-0011-X006 

Submitted to: 

Jenkins Brick Company 

1228 N McDonough 

Montgomery, Alabama 36104 

Attention: Mr. Cort Peavy 

Entec Project No. 27154 

Completed By: 

(-J/Art Otero 

Proiect Leader 

Report Submitted: June 15, 2007 

Reviewed By: 

Tom Lotz 

Technical Services Manager 

hereby certify to the best of my knowledge all field sampling and laboratory analysis performed 

for this report is authentic and accurate. It has been checked for completeness and accuracy. 
Jenkins Brick 

Table of Contents 

Section Pa_qe No. 

Executive Summary 

Emissions Summary 

Detailed Test Results 

Samplin_(3 Procedures 

Location of Test Ports 

Method 26A Sampling Train 

Field Data Sheets Main Stack 

Test Run No. 1 

Test Run No. 2 

Test Run No, 3 

Control Room Data 

Test Protocol 

Quality Control I Quality Assurance Procedures 

Field QA I QC Checklist 

Meter Orifice and Temperature Check Sheet 

Fyrite Standardization Sheet 

Method 5126A Sample Recovery Sheet 

Laboratory Analysis 

Audit Sample Results 

Equipment Calibrations 

Nomenclature and Test Calculations 

1 

2 

3 

7 

11 

12 

13 

14 

17 

20 

23 

25 

28 

33 

34 

36 

39 

40 

44 

48 

59 
Executive Summat3f 

Entec Services, Inc was retained by Jenkins Brick Company to perform additional 

MACT testing l•or particulate matter, hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride on the 

DiFF Baghouse Stack at the facility located in Montgomery, Alabama. Mr. Art Otero, 

and Mr. Trent iVIcMahan of Entec Services, inc. conducted the testing on June 5, 2007. 

Representing the Alabama Department of Environmental iVlanagement (ADEM) was Mr. 

Bryan Brumfield and Mr• Patrick Byrd. Mr Cort Peavy of Jenkins Brick help coordinate 

the testing with operations. 

ADEM provided audit samples that were supplied to the lab and have been included in 

the laboratory analysis section. All audit samples were verified by ADEM / EPA as 

passing. 

No difficulties were encountered in the field or in the laboratory analysis of the samples 

by Entec Services: Inc. The particulate and HCI / HF emissions test summary on the 

following page gives a detailed summary of each test run compared to the maximum 

emission limits set forth by the Alabama Department of Environmental Management. 

(ADEM). Test results indicate the particulate emissions are below the limits set 

forth by the ADEM Permit No. 209-0011-X006. 

• ¢ O0 ¢ 

00000 
Detailed Test Results 
SOURCE OWNER: 

PLANT LOCATION: 

SOURCE(S) NAME(S): 

SOURCE(S) CONDITION: 

Entec Services, Inc. 

SOURCE OVERVIEW 

Jenkins Brick 

Montgomery, AL 

DIFF Baghouse Stack 

MACT testing with Lime Rate at 60 Lb/Hr 

SOURCE(S) SHAPE: 

PROBE WASH CHEMICAL: 

SOURCE PERMIT NUMBER: 

TEST PERFORMED: 

ADDITIONAL TEST REQUIREMENTS: 

( "•EFERENCE• METHOD TESTS: 

PROJECT MANAGER 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST PROJECT LEADER 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST ASSISTANT 

OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: 

RULING AGENCY 

RULING AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: 

co.ooc o: 

ENTEC PROJECT NUMBER: 

Circular 

Acetone 

209-0011-X006 

Particulate and HCI/HF Testing 

BRICK MACT Subpart JJJJJ 

Sample Location EPA Method 1 

Volumetric Flow EPA Method 2 

Molecular Weight EPA Method 3 

Moisture Content EPA Method 4 

Particulate EPA Method 5 

HCI and HF EPA Method 26A 

Mr, Lynn Beane 

Mr. Art Otero 

Mr. Trent McMahan 

Mr. Cort Peavy 

Alabama Department of Environmental Management 

Mr, Bryan Brumfield and Mr. Patrick Byrd 

06/05/07 

27154 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

INPUT TEST DATA 

Client: 

Source: 

Jenkins Brick 

DIFF Baghouse Stack 

Job No.: 27154 

Data Input By: Art Otero 

Field Data 

Run Number 

Test Date 

Time Test Run Began Ended 

Sampling Time 

Stack Area 

Barometric Pressure 

=Stack Static Pressure 

Pitot Tube Correction factor 

Meter Correction Factor 

•Meter Delta H @ 

Nozzle Diameter 

:Vleter Volume 

Meter Temperature 

Avg. Orifice Delta H 

Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture) 

Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) 

Oxygen Concentration, dry basis 

Carbon Dioxide Concentration, dry basis 

Avg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P 

Stack Temperature 

Total Hydrogen Chloride collected, mg 

Total Hydrogen Fluoride collected, mg 

Total particulate collected 

Symbol 

Pbat 

P• 

Cp 

Y 

On 

Vm 

trn 

&H 

Ws• 

O• 

CO2 

(sqrt AP)avg 

HCL 

HF 

Units 

Military Time 

minutes 

Ft 

in. Hg 

in. H20 

in. Hz0 

inches 

dcf 

F 

in. H•0 

grams 

grams 

(in. H20) 

F 

mg 

mg 

mg 

Test Data 

06/05/07 06/05/07 06/05/07 

0800-0904 0950-1054 1132-1237 

6O 

27.494 

29.85 

-0.25 

0.84 

1.004 

1.800 

0.300 

39.861 

85.9 

1.29 

76.9 

10.4 

17.0 

3.0 

0.523 

402.6 

1.8 

0.54 

1.6 

6O 

27.494 

29.85 

-0.29 

0.84 

1.004 

1.800 

0.300 

40.086 

93.6 

1.30 

76.2 

10.0 

16.5 

3.0 

0.526 

403.7 

1.8 

0.37 

2.0 

6O 

27.494 

29.85 

-0.27 

0.84 

1.004 

1.800 

0.300 

40.214 

100.4 

1.27 

79.4 

9.8 

17.0 

AVERAGE 

6O 

29.85 

-0.27 

0.84 

1.004 

1.800 

0.300 

40.054 

93.3 

1.29 

77.5 

10.1 

16.8 

4.0 3.3 

0.518 0.522 

412.3 406.2 

1.2 1.6 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

CALCULATED TEST DATA 

Client: Jenkins Brick 

Source: DIFF Ba•lhouse Stack 

Description Formulas 

Run Number 

Test Date 

Time Began-Ended 

1. Stack Pressure Pb.• Pal 13.6 

2. Meter Pressure P•at •.H 13.6 

3. Standard Meter Volume 17.64" Y* (VmlTm)* (P•a, +/'H 113.6 

4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed =0.04706*W•m 

4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel =0.04715=w• 

5. Moisture Fraction 

9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis 

10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis 

1. Average Stack Gas Velocity 

12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions 

=(V•l• Vw=•,td})l(V•(=•dl Vw•{=di 

0.32=(O2)+ 0.44"(CO•)+0.28"(100-(O=)-(CO•)) 

M•*(1-B.s)+I 8.0*(Bws) 

13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions 

85.49*Cp*(sqrt ,•P},v•*SQRT((Ts) (Ps=Mw)) 

60*vs*A, 

14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions 

14b, Hydrogen Chloride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. =(0.01543*HCL•q)IQ=¢ 

14b. Hydrogen Fluoride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. 

15. Particulate concentration @ Standard Conditions 

15b. Hydrogen Chloride emissions, Ibs per hour 

=(0.01543*HFm•)IQst< 

=0,01543*mnNmlstdl 

=(6017000)'HCLQ•d*Q=z• 

=(6017000)*HFQstd*Q=t 

S•/mbol 

B• 

115b, Hydrogen Fluoride emissions, Ibs per hour HF -Ibslhr 

21. Particulate emissions (S0/7000)*c,'Q,,• PaR 

22. Volume collected through nozzle =T=/Ps*[0.002669*Vt=+ V•*Y*Pm/T• V. 

23. Particulate concentration, @ actual conditions =0.01543"m.N. 

24. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent 100"Vn (60*v•'A.*0) 

Post Meter Orifice Cal. (EMC ALT-009 Yqa) 

% Difference. (Calibration must be within 5% of original Y-factor) 

Units 

Military Time 

in. Hg 

in. Hg 

dscf 

scf 

scf 

fraction 

g/g-mole 

g/g-mole 

ffJs 

acfm 

scfm 

dscfm 

grldscf 

grldscf 

gtldscf 

Ibs/hr 

Ibslhr 

Ib/hr 

acf 

gr/acf 

% 

Job No.: 27154 

Data input By: Art Otero 

Calculated Data 

06/05/07 06/05/07 0•05•7 

AVERAGE 

0800-0904 0950-1054 1132-1237 

29.83 29.83 29.83 29.83 

29.94 29.95 29.94 29.94 

38,724 38.404 38.054 38.394 

3.619 3,586 3.737 3,647 

0.490 0.472 0.462 0.475 

0.0959 0.0956 0.0994 0.0970 

29.160 29.140 29.320 29.207 

28.089 28.076 28.195 28.120 

38.14 38.34 37.89 38.121 

62,912 63,247 62,500 62,886 

38,380 38,532 37,704 38,206 

34,698 34,850 33,958 34,602 

0.001 0.001 0,001 0.001 

0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 

0.0006 0.0008 0.0005 0.0006 

0.21 0.22 0.25 0.23 

0.06 0.04 0.01 0.04 

0.19 0.24 0.15 0.19 

70,212 69.698 70.041 69.984 

0.0004 0.0004 0.0003 0.0004 

104.18 102.87 104.62 103.89 

0.9694 0.9761 0.9642 0.9699 

3.40% 
Sampling Procedures 
Procedures 

The emission rates were determined using EPA Methods 1 5, and 26A of CFR Title 

40, Part 60, Appendix A. The calibration and quality assurance procedures of EPA 

CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix A for all methods, and the "Quality Assurance Handbook for 

Air Pollution Measurement System" Volume III Stationary Source-Specific Methods 

were followed throughout the duration of the field and laboratory testing. 

The most current version for each method (as described in the Federal Register) was 

used. 

Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Methods 1 and 2 

The velocity of the gas stream was determined according to EPA Reference Method 1 

and 2 by reading the instantaneous velocity head with an inclined manometer at each 

sampling point with a calibrated S-type pitot tube attached adjacent to the sample 

nozzle. The stack pressure was measured with the static side of an S-type pitot tube. 

A calibrated pyrometer was used to measure stack temperature at each sampling point. 

The stack was tested for cyclonic flow according to EPA Reference Method 1. 

Stack Gas Molecular Weight Method 3 

The carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations were determined using EPA Reference 

Method 3 (Fyrite Method). A sample of the flue gas was extracted from the gas stream 

during each test. These samples were analyzed with a Fyrite gas analyzer. The 

molecular weight of the gas was calculated using the moisture, oxygen and carbon 

dioxide content and the measured stack gas temperature. 

Moisture Content Method 4 

The moisture content used for calculating the gas stream flow rate was determined by 

measuring the amount of condensed moisture in the glass impingers and silica gel 

impinger in the sampling train as described in EPA Reference Method 4 at the 

completion of each test. 

Hydrogen Chloride / Hydrogen Fluoride with Particulate Method 5/26A 

Preliminary data was used to determine stack temperature, pressure, and range of 

velocity heads, moisture content and stack gas dry molecular weight prior to sampling. 
The meter box was leak checked from the pump to the orifice. Initial and final leak 

checks of the sampling system and pitot lines were performed as outlined in Method 5 

and were recorded on the data sheets. The nozzle (glass or Teflon with an angle of 

taper of 30 degrees and of button hook design) was calibrated before and after the test 

using a micrometer and was also recorded on the data sheets. 

The sampling probe was placed at each sampling point to provide a total sampling time 

of at least 60 minutes and a volume of at least 31.8 cubic feet. The gases were drawn 

fhrn•Jnh • f•_flnn nnzTl•_ •ff•P.h•.rt fn • h•.•f•.rt g!ass lind.r1 nrnh•. The. g•.•..• fh•n 

proceeded through borosilicate glass filter holder, with a Teflon frit filter support through 

a tarred Teflon filter to remove particulate matter. The exit of the filter will be maintained at a temperature of greater than 248 0 F. These temperatures were recorded at 

each point on the data sheets. 

The gases were then scrubbed through a series of four impingers (optional impinger not 

included) to capture hydrogen halides and halogens and moisture. The first and 

second impingers contained approximately 100 ml of a 0.1N H2SO4 solution and the 

third and fourth impingers contained approximately 100 ml of a 0.1 N NaOH solution. 

The fifth impinger contained approximately 250 grams of pre-weighed silica gel to 

remove any remaining moisture. The gases passed through the impinger series in an 

ice bath to maintain a maximum exit temperature of 68 0 F. This temperature was 

recorded on the data sheets. The clean and cool gases then entered the meter box 

where the gas flow and temperature were measured. 

After the completion of the test leak rate determinations were made. Then the sampling 

train and the probe nozzle assembly was transferred to the cleanup area making sure 

no particulate was lost. The cleanup data was recorded. 

Particulate catches were placed in sealed petri dishes. Each acetone rinse from the 

nozzle, probe, and filter holder was combined and placed in a sealed container. For the 

group of tests an acetone blank of approximately 200 milliliters was placed in a sealed 

container. The first and second impinger contents were weighed and then transferred 

to its recovery container with the rinsing from the connecting glassware were added to 

this container. The third and fourth contents were weighed and the contents discarded. 
The silica gel from the fifth impinger was weighed. A blank of the sulfuric acid solution 

and acetone was taken. These containers were clearly marked and transported to the 

laboratory for analysis. The laboratory we used was Stillbrook Analytical. 

10 
Entec Services, Inc 

16 D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, AL 35023 

Client: Jenkins Brick Job No. 27154 

Source: DIFF Baghouse Stack Input By: Art Otero 

Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate (P): 

Stack Diameter, inches: 71 

Stack Height, feet: 60 

P Port Type Flange Port Diameter 6.0" 

Stack Area, Ft2: 27.494 

Number of Ports: 2 

Stack Properties: Inches Duct Diameters 

Upstream Disturbance: 156.0 

Downstream Disturbance: 504.0 

2.20 

7.10 

Length of Port, inches: 

Total Number of Traverse Points: 

Number of Points per diameter: 

10.50 

12 

6 

71.0 INCHES 

156.0 NCHES 

504.0 INCHES 

Point No. 

Inside Stack Outside Nipple 

Inches Inches 

3.1 13.6 

2 10.4 20.9 

3 21.0 31.5 

4 50.0 60.5 

5 60.6 71.1 

6 67.9 78.4 

Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch 

Adjusted points diameter < 24" no point closer than 0.5 inch 

Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 

4 points per port if the 81 2 diameters downstream and 

upstream criteria is met. 
Method 5/26A Sampling Train 

Filter Exit Temperature 

(>2480 F) 

0.1N 0.1N -25o• 

Impinger Exit Temperature 

Ice Bath 

Exhaust 

Temp. and Flow 

Controllers 

• 

Temperature •) [Manometer 

Dry Gas Meter 
DIFF Baghouse Stack 

Field Data Sheets 
DIFF Baghouse Stack 

Test Run No. 1 

14 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Client: Jenkins Brick Test Date: 615/2007 

Source: DIFF Baghouse Stack Run Number: 1 

PARTICULATE W/HYDROGEN CHLORIDE HYDROGEN FLOURIDE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 5/26A 

Traverse Point 

1-1 

uel•a P' 

0.32 

Sq. Rt. Delta P 

0.5657 

Uelta H 

1.50 

Stack: Temp. ('F) 

400 

1-2 0.34 0.5831 1.59 401 

1-3 0.30 0.5477 1.40 401 

1-4 0.28 0.5292 

1-5 

1.31 

0,25 0.5000 1.17 

1-6 0.18 0.4243 0.84 

2-1 0.26 0.5099 1.22 

0.5292 

0.5568 

0.5385 

0.5385 

0.28 

0.31 

0.29 

2-2 1.31 

2-3 

2-4 

2-5 

1.45 

1.36 

0,29 1.36 

Meter Temp. (°F) 

80 

81 

83 

K-Factor 

402 83 

400 84 

391 86 

404 87 

407 

409 

409 

407 

88 

89 

89 

9O 

2-6 0.21 0.4583 0.98 400 91 

4.68 0.28 0.5234 1.29 402.6 85.9 

15 
•EEE 

0 

oio18 
DIFF Baghouse Stack 

Test Run No. 2 

17 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Client: Jenkins Brick Test Date: 6/5/2007 

Source: DIFF Baghouse Stack Run Number: 2 

PARTICULATE W/HYDROGEN CHLORIDE HYDROGEN FLOURIDE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 5126A 

Traverse Point 

1-1 

1-2 

1-3 

1-4 

1-5 

1-6 

Deita P 

0.24 

0.27 

0.26 

0.30 

0.25 

0,25 

0.4899 

0.5196 

0.5099 

0.5477 

0.5000 

0.5000 

2-1 0.31 0.5568 

2-2 0.36 0.6000 

0.32 

0.28 

0,25 

0.24 

0.28 

2-3 

2-4 

2-5 

2-6 

K-Factor 

4,70 

0.5657 

0.5292 

O.5O0O 

0.4899 

0.5257 

Delta H 

1.13 

1.27 

1.22 

1.41 

1.18 

1.18 

1.46 

1.69 

1.50 

1.32 

1.18 

1.13 

1.30 

:Stacl( Temp. ('F) 

4O5 

404 

403 

402 

402 

394 

Meter Temp. (°F) 

89 

89 

90 

91 

93 

93 

407 94 

407 95 

407 96 

406 

404 

403 

403.7 

97 

98 

98 

93.6 
OEEE 
DIFF Baghouse Stack 

Test Run No. 3 

20 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Client: Jenkins Brick Test Date: 615/2007 

Source: DIFF Baghouse Stack Run Number: 3 

PARTICULATE Wl HYDROGEN CHLORIDE HYDROGEN FLOURIDE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 5/26A 

1-1 

1-2 

0.36 

0.34 

K-Factor 

0.6000 

0.5831 

1-3 0.34 0.5831 

1-4 0.30 0.5477 

1-5 0,22 

1-6 0.20 

2-1 0.23 

2-2 0.27 

2-3 0.25 

2-4 0.25 

Delia H Stack Temp.('F) 

1.69 407 

1.60 

1.60 

1.41 

0.4690 1.03 

0.4472 0.94 

0.4796 1.08 

408 

4O8 

•ieter Temp. (:F) 

96 

96 

98 

409 99 

408 100 

416 100 

409 102 

0.5196 1.27 415 102 

0.5000 1.18 419 102 

0.5000 1.18 417 103 

2-5 0.28 0.5292 1.32 417 103 

2-6 0.21 0.4583 0.99 414 104 

4.70 0.27 0.5181 1.27 412.3 100.4 

21 
8SS• 

:•EEE 
Control Room Data 
JENKINS BRICK MONTGOMERY PLANT PRODUCTION DATA (FOR METHOD 26fTA( 

car/24 hour 

brick per car 

fired brick wt. (Ib) 

wt per car (Ib): 

wt per 24 hr (Ib): 

29 

5712 

3.41 

19477.92 

467470.1 

ton brick per car: 

ton brick per 24 hr: 

9.73896 

233.735 

24 
0 

0 

0 
EN TEC Services 

Pollution Control System Evaluation and Source Emissions Testing 

May 21,2007 

Ms. Wendy Hall 

Alabama Department of Environmental Management 

PO Box 301463 

Montgomery, AL 36130-1483 

Subject: Test Protocol for Jenkins Brick Montgomery Facility 

DIFF Stack Part 63, Subpart JJJJJ (Methods 1-5, w126A -PM, HCI & HF) 

Montgomery, AL 

Dear Ms. Roberts, 

This letter is to inform you of our intent to begin additional MACT testing for Particulate 

Matter, Hydrogen Chloride and Hydrogen Fluoride Testing on the DIFF Baghouse 

Stacks at the Jenkins Brick facility located in Montgomery, Alabama. Testing will be 

coordinated with Mr. Cort Peavy Environmental Manager of Jenkins Brick or other 

personnel as required. A test date has been scheduled for June 5, 2007. Testing will 

be conducted over a one (1) day period. This additional testing is being conducted per 

the request of Mr. Cort Peavy to establish a lower lime injection rate. 

(1) Entec's test team will arrive at Jenkins Brick on June 5 th, 2007 at 

approximately 7:00-7:30 am to begin leak checks and perform initial QA/QC 

checks as required. We expect to begin the testing at approximately 8:00am. 

Mr. Art Otero or Mr. Tim Draheim will be the on site project manager with 

additional personnel to be determined based on availability of personnel 

during the scheduled time frame. 

16-D Commerce Avenue Hueytown, Alabama 35023 Phone: (205) 491-6676 

www. entecservices, corn 

26 

Fax (205) 491-6614 
(2) Entec will perform three (3) one hour test runs for Particulate Matter, Hydrogen 

Chloride (HCI) and Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) on the DIFF Baghouse stack. The 

emissions testing and reporting will be performed in accordance with EPA CFR 

40 Part 60 Appendix "A" and Part 63 Subpart J J J J J, EPA Test methods 1-5 w/ 

26A. All testing and laboratory QA / QC requirements will be followed as 

described. 

(3) Jenkins Brick personnel will collect all required control room and operational data 

as required under the operating permit for final reporting requirements. (Feed 

Rate Total Tons Fired Brick) 

If you should have any questions, please call Entec at 205-491-6676. Our Jenkins plant 

contact is Mr. Cort Peavy who can be reached at 334-834-2210. 

Sincerely, 

Entec Services, Inc. 

D. Lynn Beane 

Operations Manager 

16-D Commerce Avenue Hueytown, Alabama 35023 Phone: (205) 491-6676 Fax (205) 491-6614 

www.entecservices.com 

27 
Quality Assurance / Quality Control, 

Procedures 

28 
QA / QC Procedures 

Specific quality assurance / quality control procedures were adhered to during this test 

project to provide valid and scientifically defensible data. For any environmental field 

and laboratory measurement, a degree of uncertainty exists in the data due to inherent 

limitations of the measurement systems employed. The objective of a QA/QC program 

is to produce data of known precision, accuracy, representation, completeness and 

comparability. The objective in this test project was to determine compliance with 

applicable air permit requirements. The final data user in this project will be the 

Alabama Department of Environmental Management. 

The following section details all QC procedures followed during the manual sampling 

activities. 

Velocity / Volumetric Flow Rate Methods 1 and 2 

Volumetric flow rates were determined during each isokinetic test run. 

QC steps were adhered to during these tests: 

The following 

Reported duct dimensions were checked by physical measurements to determine 

cross-sectional duct area. 

Pitot tube coefficients were determined based on physical measurement techniques 

as delineated in Method 2 

The Type-S pitot tube was visually inspected before and after sampling. 

The pitot tube was installed on the sampling probe with the proper orientation and 

spacing from the sampling nozzle. 

Before each series of tests, thermocouple readings for the silica gel impinger exit 

temperature was checked against an N.I.S.T. traceable thermometer. 

The oil manometer was leveled and zeroed before each test run. 

Both legs of the pitot tube were leak-checked before and after sampling. 

Proper orientation of the pitot tube was maintained while making measurements. 

The roll and pitch axis of the pitot tube was maintained at 90 o to the flow. 

An average velocity pressure reading was recorded at each point instead of 

recording extreme high or low values. 

The pitot/manometer umbilical lines were inspected before and after sampling for 

moisture condensate. Lines were cleared if moisture was found. 

29 
Molecular Weiqht Determination-Fyrite Analysis Method 3 

The carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations were determined using EPA Reference 

Method 3. A sample of the flue gas was extracted from the gas stream during each test. 

The samples were analyzed with a Fyrite gas analyzer. The following QC steps were 

adhered to during these tests: 

The sampling train was leak checked before and after each samples was taken. 

The samples were run in triplicate for accuracy. 

Standardization was performed to audit the reagents and the operators technique. 

A knnwn mi•(tzJr•, nf R• •nrl rl• w•_• •n•lvT•d •nrl r•n•::if•rl •Mifh .o, 

values +/- 0.$ percent of the known value. 

Two NIST traceable gas cylinders were run against the instrument to audit the 

accuracy of the analyzer and the analyzer operator technique. One cylinder 

contained 2 to 4 percent 02 and 14 to 18 percent CO2. The second cylinder 

contained 2 to 4 percent CO2 and about 15 percent 02. 

Moisture Determination Method 4 

Stack gas moisture content (Bws) was determined by dividing the mass of moisture 

collected by the impingers or stainless steel condenser and silica gel impinger by the 

standardized volume of gas sampled. The following QC steps were adhered to during 

these tests: 

The indicating silica gel was fresh for the first run and periodically inspected and 

replaced during runs, if needed. 

The analytical balance was placed in a clean, motionless environment for weighing. 

The balance was leveled and zeroed if necessary before each weighing. 

Preliminary silica gel impinger tare weights and post-run weights were weighed to 

the nearest 0.1 g. 

Before each series of tests, thermocouple readings for the silica gel impinger exit 

temperature were checked against an N.I.S.T. traceable thermometer. 

The silica gel impinger gas temperature was maintained below 68°F and recorded 

at every traverse point. 

Each impinger was wiped of surface moisture before post-run weighing. 

The volume of liquid captured was measured using a graduated cylinder with 1- 

milliliter increments. 

30 
Particulate Matter HCI HF Sampling Method 5 / 26A 

Accurate particulate concentrations are dependent on the mass of particulate matter 

collected by the train and recovered after sampling, and the standardized gas sample 

volume measured° QC procedures that were followed so that representative particulate 

data was collected by the sampling system were: 

Only clean, well-maintained sampling equipment was used. 

Sampling ports were inspected and cleaned prior to sampling. 

All equipment was calibrated according to EPA standards. The dry gas meter was 

fully calibrated within the past 12 months using a set of calibrated orifices. 

The sampling train components exposed to sample gas were constructed of glass 

or Teflon. 

Accurate barometric pressure was recorded at least once per day. 

The dry gas meter thermocouples were compared to ambient temperature prior to 

the test run as a check on operation. 

Pretest and post-test leak-checks were completed (must be tess than 0.02 cfm or 

4% of the average sampling rate). 

Before each series of tests, thermocouple readings for meter temperature, filter 

hotbox, probe, and filter exit temperatures were checked against an N.I.S.T. 

traceable thermometer. 

Readings of the dry gas meter, meter orifice pressure (L•H), meter temperatures, 

filter hotbox temperatures, probe temperatures, and filter exit temperatures were 

taken at every traverse point. 

Probe and filter temperatures were monitored and maintained at 248 + 25 0 F. 

The filter exit temperature was maintained at 248 + 25 0 F. 

The gas meter was read to the thousandth of a cubic foot for the initial and final 

readings. 

The sampling velocity through the nozzle was maintained within 10% of the stack 

gas velocity (isokinetic sampling rate at 100+10%). 

All nozzle/probe recovery items were pre-cleaned and kept in containers when not 

being used. 

Filter recovery used tweezers to handle the filter, and was careful to include any 

filter fibers or pieces adhering to the filter holder. 

Probe and nozzle recovery included wiping the outer surface clean of dust before 

sample recovery. Sample recovery consisted of multiple brushing of the inner 

31 
surface and twisting/rotating the probe during recovery operations. Transfer of 

rinse acetone to the sample container was accomplished without loss of liquid. 

Nozzle and probe brushes were rinsed after brushing inner surfaces. 

Liquid levels were marked on sample containers and sealed for shipment to the 

laboratory. 

Acetone rinse blank was collected for laboratory analysis. 

Prior to the initial run a y-factor check was performed to ensure that the meter was 

operating according to the original calibration to within 3% of the original y-factor. 

For the .post-test calibration the alternative Method 5 .post-test calibration 

procedures were used (Emission Measurement Center Approved Alternative 

Method ALT-009). 

32 
ENTEC SERVICES, INC 

FIELD QA I QC CHECKLIST 

PERMIT NUMBER: 

TEST METHODS USED: i-•', ,0,/o ,•, 

CONTROL AGENCY: 

ENTEC PERSONNEL: 

MODIFICATIONS TO METHOD: /• 

ON S,TE REPRESENTATiVE: <v--- 

•<•4•4 2,,,/, P•NT CONTACT:_ 

Was Calibration Data on site? (Methods 1-5 / CEMS CAL Gas) 

Was Stack Diameter I Area & Traverse Points verified on field data sheets? 

N._ O 

Was a 10-minute Meter Orifice Check performed? 

Results of check •)•.• 

Were Temperatures Verified w/NIST Traceable Thermometer? 

Was Preliminary Traverse wl Cyclonic Flow verification performed? 

Was previous test data on source used to determine K factor? 

Was Probe & Hot Box Temperatures maintained at 248 +/- 25 ° F? 

If not, explain 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

!.,5. Was Acetone Lot Numbe.••and rec,o•n 

Signature (Test Team Leader)•S//L./,/. _//•/(•,•/__ ) 

/ 

As required: Control room data supplied by: (_/'Or • 

Revision 2 December 2005 DLB 

33 

Was Filter Outlet Tempe. rature maintained at 248 ÷/- 25 ° F? _J(__ 

Was Orsat or Fyrite lea•k., checked and standardization perfo•r, med as required? 

Ambient 02 Reading(•O '•" % Ambient CO2 Reading /(•2 % 

Was Tedlar Gas Sampling Bags used? If not, explain 

Were they leak-checked? Y or.N 

Were Pitot Leak Checks performed & recorded on eaph field data sheet? 

Pitot inspected'•or N Noted Visual Defects? 

Was Meter Leak Checks performed & recorded on each field date sheet? 

Was Nozzle Diameter measured & recorded on each field data sheet? 

Nozzle inspected.• or N Noted Visual Defects? •o • 

Was Silica Gel Verified, and recorded for each test run? _.• 

Percentage Used during test- Run No.'s 1: /0• 2: ,/c3°•o 3: 

Field Data Sheet 

Date: 

x 

via on-site, email, or fax. 
ENTEC SERVICES, 

METER ORIFICE AND TEMPERATURE CHECKS 

Oate: 

Meter Box Number: 

Original •,H@" /. 

Location: 

Barometric Press•e: n•.• 

Original Y: 

Bi-Annual Calibration Date: 

RUN METER FOR EXACTLY 10.0 MINUTES 

Hg 

Orifice Manometer 

Reading &H equal to Dry Gas Volume, ft • 

,•H Q 

Dry Gas Meter Inlet 

Temperature, °F 

Dry Gas Meter Outlet 

Temperature, °F 

llllilill I-III¢II llllll•ll 

Average: •,• Total Volume: Average: 

Vm = Volume of Dry Gas Meter 

TIn= Average Temperature of Dry Gas Meter in degrees Rankin (+460) 

PBarm = Barometric Pressure 

Yc 

Thermocouple Check (all temperatures are in 

= 10NmX •/{ 0.0319 X TmlPa=m} 

= 101( •7-$• ) x •/{ 0.0319 x ( •'•=7 )//OF/. 7,.• )} 

Is Y= < +/- 3% of Original Y ? V'•O•; d,•/• 

o F) NIST Traceable ID 

Thermocouples I I.D. Ambient Temp. 

Other • / 

Field Checks Performed By (Signature): • 

Revision September 2005 DLB 

Reference Temp. Acceptance Range 

+1- 7.5 o 

+1- 5.4 o 

+/- 5.4 o 

+1- 2.0 o 

+1- 5.4 o 

+1- 2.0 o 

+1- 5.4 o 

OK? 

34 
•:,•O/l•2C 11025 AND ANSIINCSL 

",.,,,• A,•"" ,.,•,,•.,•,.• .me : O e 't. N o, 4 3 7 "1 15 "1 "19 8 0 

Tr•:eable@ C ,:,-'•''•" -, ._£ 

Instrurnerlt Iclentificatiorl: 

Model: 14-648-44 

Standarcls/Equipment: 

Description 

emperal:ure Probe 

Themfistor Module 

I'emporature CalibFalion Dath TC155 

Ternperalute Probe 

hermislor Module 

Temperalure Calibration Bath TC'191 

Certificato Information: 

Iechnician: 68 

Test Condil.ions: 

S/N: 72083241 

Procedure: CAL-03 

ManulactLirer Cor•trol Compal•y 

SP.rial I',lun'fl•e,r 13ue Date NIST lra{;eable Re•arenc•-• 

21.5"C ,19.0 %RIt t018 mBar 

Calibration Data: (New Instrument) 

LJni[(s• No•l•il•al As Fouled In TOI 

"C N.A 

-'19 8il -fi07 A6713030 

A27129 7,"10/07 100020769,1 

93139 

157 I/1,1/07 A6B06053 

A 17118 8/23/Q7 A•J823089 

A42238 

CalDate: 1/11/07 CalDue: '1/10/09 

"C N.A 

Nominal AS Leri 

0.000 .-ft.3 

99.999 !)0.4 

This Instrument was calibrated using Instruments Traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology, 

Maintaining Accuracy: 

Recalibration: 

CONTROL COMPANY 4455 Rex Road Friendswood, TX 77546 USA 

Phone 281 482o17'14 Fax 281 482-9448 service@control3.com www,control3.com 

C•)nlrO• Con•)a•y ISO 9001 Ouahly CerliSed by (DNV) Oel Ne[ske Ver•laS, Cetl•flcale NO. CBRT-OISOS-AO-I IOU. 

35 
TEC SERVICES, INC. 

ORSAT STANDARDIZATION 

Source: •"•+- 

Orsat / • Leak Check: 

Date of Test: •"-•'-O'• 

Date of Standardization: ,•'•- •'- • 

Orsat / •ID #: •-&--/1 / 

Calibration Gases 

V•IlUUI 

Gas 

Concentration, (%) 

Tank1 

02 C02 

Carrier Gas 

Container Type 

Cylinder ID # 

Date of Expiration 

Tank 2 

.002 

Tank 1 

1 

Actual 

co2 //•.• 

O2 %.o 

Net 

7.0 

2 

Actual 

/6o 

Net 

/{o.o 

"•.• 

3 

Actual Net 

//_,. o /•..o 

Average 

Net 

Volume 

Known 

Value 

Difference 

Tank 1 

2 

Actual 

C02 3 .o 

02 I•'.d 

Net 

/•.• 

2 

Actual 

/•o 

Net 

"•.0 

3 

Actual Net 

•.O 

Average 

Net 

Volume 

Known 

Value 

Difference 

o. ooZ 

t •IALYST (Signature I Date): 

36 
Certificate of Analysis 

Dace of Analysis: 

Gusto.reef N•rne 

G, ra.de of Product: 

7; 

PRIMARY STANDARD 

Reference Number: 

Part Number: 

87-• 10858887-4 

X03 N t8i P 15AC225 

Cylinder Number 

CC214147 

Component Requested 

Concentration 

Actual Concentration 

OXYGEN 3.000 % 2.993 % 

CARBON DIOXIDE 16.00 % 15.97 % 

NITROGEN Ba}anc-• Balance 

Notes: 

Relative Uncertainty of A.. na_La•] .t•_ica•l Value: +f- t% of component or +t- 0.02% of absolute, 

which ever is bower, 

Primary Standard gas mixtures are traceable to N,[.S.T weights andior N.I.S,T gas mixture 

refe fence materia] s. 

Approval Si•r".,atu,"e ,, 

Page 

37 
Certificate of Analysis 

Date of Analysis: 

Customer Name: 

Grade or Product: 

7/14/2005 

PRIMARY STANDARD 

Reference N umber: 

Pa.rt N umbe,': 

87-110858887-5 

X0 •N';-SzP 1 ,,,•C 2•3 

Cylinder Number 

CC214139 

Component 

CARBON D!OXIDE 

OXYGEN 

NITROGEN 

Requested 

3.000 % 

15.00 % 

Balance 

Actual Coi)centrati_on 

3.002 % 

14.97 % 

Balance 

Notes: 

Relative Uncertainty of Analytical Value: +# t% of component or +# 0.02% of absolute, 

whichever is lower, 

Primary Standard gas mixtures are traceable to N.I,S.T weights and/or N.i.S.T gas mixture 

reference mat•,rials --'"i • 

38 
ENTEC SERVICES, INC. 

METHOD 26A SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

Client / Location: Jenkins Brick / DIFF Baghouse Stack 

Run No.: 1 Recovery Date: 6/5/2007 

Impingers 1 2 3 4 

Sampling Date(s): 6/5/2007__ 

Recovered By: AO 

6 Silical Gel 

Final Wt. 

Initial Wt. 

Net Weight 

751.3 

697.7 

53.6 

716.7 

699.0 

17.7 

702.2 

698.0 

4.2 

725.9 

724.5 

1.4 

900.5 

Description of Impinger Contents: Clear 

Desc ri,n_ rio r•ofP•rticulateonEilte•:•ite 

Silica Gel Color: Mixed 

Filter I.D. Number: TFE-11 

Probe Rinse Container No.: R-1 

Impinger Contents Container No.: R-1 

Run No.: 2 Recovery Date: 

Impingers 1 2 3 

Total Moisture 87.3 Grams 

Sealed: • N 

Percent Spent: 10 

Filter Container No.: TFE-11 

Liquid Level Marked Sealed: 

Liquid Level Marked Sealed: 

6/5/2007 Recovered By: AO 

4 5 6 Silical Gel 

Final Wt. 

Initial Wt. 

Net Weight 

766.2 

708.4 

57.8 

706.6 

692.5 

14.1 

725.0 

722.4 

2.6 

711.1 

709.4 

1.7 

892.9 

Description of Impinger Contents: 

Description of Particulate on Filter: 

Silica Gel Color: 

Filter I.D, Number: 

Probe Rinse Container No.: 

Impinger Contents Container No.: 

Run No.: 3 

Impingers 1 

Clear 

Total Moisture 86.2 Grams 

White 

Mixed 

TFE-16 

R-2 

Ro2 

Sealed: (• N 

Percent Spent: 10 % 

Filter Container No.: TFE-16 

Liquid Level Marked Sealed: @ 

Liquid Level Marked / Sealed: •) 

N 

N 

Recovery Date: 

3 

6/5/2007 Recovered By: AO 

4 5 6 Silical Gel 

Final Wt. 

Initial Wt. 

Net Weight 

775.2 

712.8 

62.4 

597.1 

584.3 

12.8 

627.7 

624.4 

3.3 

709.6 

708.7 

0.9 

938.3 

928.5 

Description of Impinger Contents: 

Description of Particulate on Filter: 

Silica Gel Color: 

Filter I.D. Number: 

Probe Rinse Container No.: 

Impinger Contents Container No.: 

BLANKS: PrCpe Rinse: 

Signature: R• 

Print Name: Art Otero 

Clear 

Total Moisture 89.2 Grams 

White 

Mixed 

TFE-17 

R-3 

R-3 

X 

Sealed: (• N 

Percent Spent: 10 % 

Filter Container No.: TFE-17 

Liquid Level Marked / Sealed: 

Liquid Level Marked Sealed: 

Impinger: X Filter: 

N 

N 

DATE TIME RECIEVED• 

Date: 

Time (24hr): 

• /•" /O7" Signature: 

/•" O• Print Name: 

39 
0 

0 

0 
ENTEC SERVICES, INC. 

Chain of Custody 

Client 

Contact: 

Phone No: 

Jenkins Brick 

Lynn Beane 

205-49!-6676 

Project No. 27154 

Lab Name: 

Lab Rrefrence No. 

Entec .Job No= NoP.O. No. 

Stillbrook 

27154 

Samples Collected by: 

Send Results to: 

Phone Fax Results To: 

A. Otero 

Lynn Beane C/O: Entec Services or Client 

205-491-6676 

Lab I.D. Field I.D. 

R-1 Stack 

R-2 Stack 

R-3 Stack 

Audit Sample #1 

Audit Sample #2 

RELINQUISHED B/Y 

Signature: 

Print Name: 

Date 

6/5/2007 

6/5/2007 

6/5/2007 

6/5/2007 

6/5/2007 

DATE / TIME 

Analysis / Method 

HCI/HF 

HCI/HF 

HCl/HF 

HCI / HF 

Time Preservative 

Signature: 

Print Name: 

6/5/2007 

/•"o • 

RECIEVED BY 

DATE / TIME 

signature: 

Print Name: 

RECIEVED BY 

Signature: 

Print Name: 

Liquid 

Liquid 

Liquid 

Liquid 

Liquid 

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS COMMENTS: 
Laboratory Data 

Particulate Matter Gravimetdc Analysis IClient: Jenkins Brick Analyst: 

•,ity/State: Montgomery, AL Bar. Press, In hg: 

!Source: DIFF Baghouse Stack Log Book Page No. 

Job No.: 27154 Lab Amb. Temp, °F: 

Balance Denver Instrument Lab Rel. Humidity, %: 

Balance ID: P0090122 Calibration (100000 mg) 

Final Weight Final Weight 2 

T. Lotz 

29.56 

10 

70 

47 

100000.0 mg 

T. Lotz 

29.50 

10 

74 

42 

100000.0 mg 

Filters 

Test No. 2 3 

Filter ID No. TFE-11 TFE-16 TFE-17 

Initial Weight, mg 286.4 279.2 275.2 

Average 286.4 279.2 275.2 

Final Weight, mg 286.6 279.7 275.4 

286.6 279.7 275.4 

6/11/07 8:30 

6/14/07 10:00 

Average 

Acetone Wash 

Beaker ID No. 20 26 28 

Volume of Acetone, ml 100 120 105 

Initial Weight, mg 67,194.5 78,456.1 74,566.4 

Average 67,194.5 78,456.1 74,566.4 

6/11/07 8:30 Final Weight, mg 67,196.1 78,457.6 74,567.4 

6/14/07 10:00 Final Weight, mg 67,195.9 78,457.8 74,567.6 

Average 67,196.0 78,457.7 74,567.5 

Acetone Blank 

Beaker ID No. 26 

Volume of Acetone, ml 200 

Initial Weight, mg 118,236.2 

Average 118,236.2 

6/11/07 8:30 Final Weight, mg 118,236.3 

6/14/07 10:00 Final Weight, mg 118,236.3 

Average 118,236.3 

Total Weight of Particulate Collected 

Weight of Particulate Collected on Filter, mg 

Weight of Particulate in Acetone Probe Wash, m 9 

Weight of Acetone Blank, mg 

Density of Acetone 

Acetone Blank Residue Concentration, mg/g 

Percent of Acetone Blank Weight 

Weight of Residue in Acetone Probe Wash, mg 

Total Weight of Particulate Collected, mg 

0.15 

1.50 

0.10 

0.7848 

0.0006 

0.45 

1.60 

0.10 

0.7848 

0.0006 

0.0001% 

0.05 

1.6 

0.0001% 

0.06 

2.0 

0.20 

1.10 

0.10 

0.7848 

0.0006 

0.0001% 

0.05 

1.2 

Laboratory Note: 

In no case shall a blank residue greater than 0.01 mg/g or 0.001% of the weight of the blank be subtracted from the sample weight 

42 
ENTEC SERVICES, INC 

LABORATORY SAMPLES QA / QC CHECKLIST 

SOURCE TESTED: L• •-"•"r c- ,•.r,• 

RECOVERED BY: /C•. 

•)'/•(,//(-. SAMPLING DATE(S): 

METHOD(S): /- 

RECOVERY DATE: • 

Description of Impinger Contents: 

Test Run No.'s 1: C 

Impinger Contents Container Number: 

Test Run No.'s 1: 

Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container? (•r N 

Liquid Level Marked? (•or N 

Filter ID Number: 

Test Run No.'s 1" -•-•'-- 

Description of Particulate on Filter: 

Test Run No.'s 1: 

Filter Container Number: 

Test Run No.'s 1" •'FE-/( 2.:-J'•-•'- 

Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container? (•)or N 

Probe Rinse Container Number: 

Test Run No.'s 1 Z 

Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container? (•or N 

Liquid Level Marked? Y or N 

Probe Rinse Reagent: /•c..•,• Lot Number. 

Laboratory Blanks: 

Probe Rinse: "'/• Impinger: •" Filter: 

3: /7..- •' 

Signature: •__•//!•/./ \ ) Date: D / .•"' O 7 

"•rintName:/r'/ Ot,¢m Time(24hr>: i•:O 0 

Signature (Project Manager or • • 

Other: 

9. Were samples analyzed by Entec Services, Inc.? Y or(l• 

Ifnot,LaboratoryPerformingAnalysis: •i"//•(o¢• ,/• •f,•//V'Z/'.• 

*** If using outside laboratory services please fill out the following chain of custody. 

•:•.• 

-•,'•A/•,'• Signature: 

Print Name: 

Revision 2 September 2005 TLj 

43 
STILLBROOK 

Environmental Testing Laboratory, In• 

305 Crawford Street 

Fairfield, AL 35064 

(205) 788-1750 

Lab Invoice #: 24441 

•lient: Mr. Lynn Beane 

Entec Services, Inc. 

16D Commerce Avenue 

Hueytown, AL 35023 

Date: June 13, 2007 

Project Name: Jenkins Brick Project Number: 27154 

Project Location: N/A P.O. Number: N/A 

Sample Matrix: Liquid 

Sampled By: A. Otero Date Collected: June 5 thru 6, 2007 

Test Method: "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600/3-83. 

Lab I.D.: 72135 

Field LD.: R- 1 Stack 

Total HCL 1.80 

0.54 

320 

LIQUID ASSAYS 

72]• --72137 :::::•/t•:•t•h::::: ::::::.•e•:•:::::: 

R-2 Stack R-3 Stack ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 

1.80 

Total HF 0.37 

2.16 

0.12 

325 

0.02 Total mg 

0.02 Total mg 

300.0 

300.0 

11-Jun-07 

11-Jun-07 

11-Jun-07 

1215 

1215 

Volume 1215 

Lab I.D.: 72140 

0.1N H2SO4 

yield I.D.: Blank 

Total HCL BDL 

Total HE BDL 

320 

::::::::::::::::::::::::: .:.:-:.:-:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.: 

0.02 mg/L 300.0 11-Jun-07 1215 MD .........................•2272s:72727•:2•::2:•::•27• 

::::::::::::::::::::::::::iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil 0.02mg/L 300.0 ll-Jun-07 1215 MD 

:::::::::::::::::::::::i:i 

Volume 100 .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:+:.:.:.:i .:.:.: :.1 mL ll-Jun-07 1215 MD 

Lab I.D.: 72138 72139 

Audit Audit 

Fidd I.D.: Sample #1 Sample #2 

rota• Chloride 287 377 

::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::•:•a•:: 

:::::::::::::::::::::::::: 0.02 mg/L 300.0 ll-Jun-07 

i:i:i:!:i:i:!:!:i:i:i:i:i .:.:-:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:-:.:.: 

1215 MD 

Detection limit, practical 

BDL=Bdow Detection Limit 

Respectfully submitted, 

ADEM Laboratory Certification I.D.# 40710 

44 
STILLBROOK 

Environmental Testing Laboratory, In• 

305 Crawford S/feet 

Fairfield, AL 35064 

(205) 788-1750 

Lab Invoice #: 24441 

( •iient: 

Project Name: 

Project Location: 

Sample Matrix: 

Sampled By: 

Lab Analyst: 

Test Method: 

Mr. Lynn Beane 

Entec Services, Inc. 

16D Commerce Avenue 

Hueytown, AL 35023 

Date: June 13, 2007 

Jenkins Brick Project Number: 27154 

N/A P.O. Number: N/A 

Liquid 

A. Otero Date Collected: June 5 thru 6, 2007 

MD Date/Time Analyzed: June 11, 2007 @ 1115 

"Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600/3-83. Method 300.0. 

QUALITY CONTROL DATA 

ERA Minerals Reference Control Lot #P128506 

Chloride Assayed: 105 mg/L 

Flouride Assayed: 1.54 mg/L 

Range: 101-124 mg/L 

Range: 1.47-1.97 mg/L 

President 

ADEM Laboratory Certification I.D.# 40710 

45 
Method 26A Audit Material 

(CI- Spiked Aqueous Solution) 

REPORTING FORM" To be completed by laboratory 

Request Number/Sample Number: M26A-3336o01/M3105 Date Issued: 06/01/07 

Audited: 

Company: 

Address: 

Reque'stor: 

Agency: 

Address: 

Attention of: 

Project Name: 

Alabama DEM 

1400 Coleseum Boulevard, Mongomery, AL 36110-2059 

Michael Jordon Phone: 334-271-7900 

Jenkins Brick 

Audit Results (Results in mg/L) 

Anal•/te 

Chloride concentration 

Result 

Revised 10/03 
Method 26A Audit Material 

(CI- Spiked Aqueous Solution) 

REPORTING FORM: To be completed by laboratory 

Request Number/Sample Number: M26A-3336-02/M3180 Date Issued: 06/01/07 

Auditee: 

Company: 

Address: 

Attention of: 

Requestor: 

Agency: 

Address: 

Attention of: 

Project Name: 

Alabama DEM 

1400 Coleseum Boulevard, Mongomery, AL 36110-2059 

Michael Jordon Phone: 334-271-7900 

Jenkins Brick 

Audit Results(Results in mg/L) 

Analyte 

Chloride concentration 

Result 

Revised 10/03 
Equipment Calibrations 
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS 

All of the emission testing equipment used was calibrated according to the procedures 

outlined in the EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix "A" and the Quality Assurance Handbook 

for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume III, EPA-600/4-77-027b. 

Type-S Pitot tube Calibrations 

The pitot tubes used for flow velocity measurement were checked for dimensions to 

verify a pitot coefficient Cp of 0.84. Documentation of the calibration and calibration 

^•'^^•" for •; 

,.,, ,•,.,,,, ,.,,me, ,,:,,,.,, ,,=,, measurementsJsprovided. 

Sampling Nozzle Calibration 

Sampling nozzles were checked visually for nicks or damage and for dimensional 

calibration prior to testing by measuring the nozzle diameter in at least three planes 

using a Vernier micrometer. Measurements must agree to within __.0.004-inches. 

Documentation is provided on the individual data sheets. 

Temperature Measuring Device Calibrations 

Each temperature sensor (stack gas, dry gas meter, and impinger exit) and readout 

was calibrated at a minimum of two points over the anticipated range of use against a 

NIST-traceable mercury-in-glass thermometer. All sensors/readouts were calibrated 

prior to field sampling. Stack gas thermocouples must agree within 1.5% (expressed in 

°R) of the reference thermometer through out the entire calibration range. Dry gas 

meter thermocouples must agree within _+5.4°F and impinger exit thermocouples must 

agree within +2°F. Documentation is provided. 

Dry Gas Meter Calibrations 

Dry gas meters were fully calibrated against a set of calibrated orifices. After assembly 

and leak checking, the console's pump is allowed to run for 15-minutes to warm up the 

dry gas meter and pump. For a pre-test full calibration, data are collected at five (5) 

orifice manometer (L•H) settings of approximately: 0.32, 0.67, 1.2, 2.0, and 3.9 inches of 

H20. Gas volumes of at least 5 ft3 are used at all the orifice settings and critical 

vacuums were obtained at all of the calibration points. The individual gas meter 

correction factors (y•) are calculated for each orifice setting and averaged. The method 

requires that each of the individual correction factors fall within +2% of the average 
correction factor, or the meter be cleaned, adjusted or repaired and recalibrated. The 

orifice pressure differential (/•H@) that equates to 0.75 cfm of air at 68°F and 29.92 

inches Hg is calculated and along with the average correction factor (y) is marked on 

the meter console. 

Analytical Balance Calibration 

The analytical balance used to weigh particulate filters and desiccated rinse samples is 

calibrated by comparing its readings against NIST Class 1 weights, with acceptable 

agreement within +0.5 mg. The field moisture gain balance was also compared to NIST 

Class 1 weight, with acceptable agreement within + lgm. 

5{} 
-=•J• 

Z 

51 
TYPE S PITOT TUBE INSPECTION DATA SHEET 

LEVEL 

--7 BULLSEh'E LEVEl. 

• C.= ---•-•' 2 

•: .z 

Tube oo 

•••-•.•.= Oistonce Between 

Parameter 

Assembl•/Level? 

Holes Dama•led? 

Obstructed? 

Value 

Yes 

No 

Allowable Ran£1e 

Yes 

No 

No No 

•1 0 -10 < (zl < +10 

¢2 0 -10 < a2 < +10 

0 

90 

9O 

.973 

0 

A 

Z A sin "( 

-5 < •1 < +5 

-5 < •2 < +5 

for 1/4" OD, 0.526 to 0.750 

for 3/8" OD, 0.788 to 1.125 

Z < 0.125" 

W A sin 0 0 W < 0.031" 

PA .487 for 1/4" OD, 0.263 to 0.375 

for 3/8" OD, 0.394 to 0.563 

PB .487 for 1/4" OD, 0.263 to 0.375 

for 3/8" OD, 0.394 to 0.563 

PA- PB 0 -0.063 to 0.063" 

DT .375 0.188 to 0.375" 

Thermocouple Cal. 80 Reference temp. 

Thermocouple Cal. 80 Probe Thermocouple 

Certification 

certify that the Type S pitot tube/probe ID # ESP-87D meets or exceeds all specifications, 

criteria and/or applicable design features and is hereby assigned a pitot tube calibration factor 

Cp of 0.84 

Certified and Calibrated By: 

Date Certified: 

Lalan R. Kirby/ 

4/23/2007 

Annual Calibration 

52 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave.Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Calibration Date: 11812007 Calibrated by: Tom Lotz 

Annual Thermocouple Calibrations 

Entec Services Temperature **Reference Thermocouple Difference Within 

ID Number Source Temperature Temperature Degrees F Tolerance 

TC-1 

TC-2 

TC-3 

TC-4 

TC-6 

TC-7 

TC-8 

TC-11 

TC-12 

TC-13 

TC-14 

TC-15 

TC-16 

TC-17 

TC-19 

TC-20 

TC-21 

ambient 60 61 

ambient 60 61 

ambient 60 61 

ambient 61 

ambient 

6O 

6O 61 

ambient 60 61 

ambient 60 60 

ambient 60 61 

ambient 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

0 Yes 

Yes 

ambient 60 61 Yes 

ambient 60 60 0 Yes 

60 60 0 Yes 

ambient 6O 61 

ambient 60 61 Yes 

ambient 60 61 Yes 

ambient 61 62 Yes 

ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

ambient 60 61 Yes 

Yes 

TC-22 ambient 60 61 Yes 

TC-23 ambient 60 61 Yes 

TC-24 ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

TCS ambient 60 60 0 Yes 

TCS 2 ambient 60 60 0 Yes 

TCS 3 ambient 60 60 0 Yes 

TCS 4 ambient 60 60 0 Yes 

TCS 5 ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

TCS 7 ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

TCS 8 ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

TCS 9 ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

TCS 10 ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

TCS 11 ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

TCS 12 ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

TCS 13 ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

TCS 14 ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

TCS 15 ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

TCS- 16 ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

Fluke Hand Held ambient 61 60 Yes 

Fluke Hand Held 2 ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

Fluke Hand Held 3 ambient 61 61 0 Yes 

:Temperature tolerance within +1- 2 F of acceptable ranges for all thennocouples. 

i** Note: NIST Traceable Digital Thermometer Serial Number 221243179 was used as reference temperature 

53 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Corn merce Ave.Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Calibration Date: 1/2/2007 Calibrated by: Tom Lotz 

Annual Hot Box Thermocouple Calibrations 

Entec Services Temperature **Reference Thermocouple Difference Within 

ID Number Source Temperature Temperature Degrees F Tolerance 

HOTBOX ambient 

HOTBOX 2 ambient 

HOTBOX 3 ambient 

HOTBOX 4 ambient 

HOTBOX 5 ambient 

66 67 Yes 

66 67 Yes 

66 66 0 Yes 

66 65 Yes 

66 67 Yes 

Yes HOTBOX 6 ambient 66 67 

HOTBOX 7 ambient 66 66 0 Yes 

HOTBOX 8 ambient 66 66 0 Yes 

HOTBOX 9 ambient 66 

HOTBOX 12 

HOTBOX 10 ambient 66 

HOTBOX 11 ambient 66 

ambient 66 

ambient 

ambient 

HOTBOX 13 

HOTBOX 14 

66 

66 

65 Yes 

67 

.65 Yes 

67 Yes 

Yes 

65 

67 

Yes 

Yee 

Temperature tolerance within +/- 20 F of acceptable ranges for all thermocouples. 

Note: NIST Traceah!e Oigital Thermometer Serial Number 221243179 was used as reference temperature 

54 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave.Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Calibration Date: 1/2/2007 Calibrated by: Tom Lotz 

Annual Gooseneck Thermocouple Calibrations 

Entec Services Temperature **Reference Thermocouple Difference Within 

iD N'.-'mbgr So,-rce T•=mper=f.r•= T•.rnp•.ratur• Degrees F Tolerance 

65 Yes GN-1 ambient 

GN-2 ambient 

GN-3 ambient 

GN-4 ambient 

GN-5 ambient 

GN-6 

GN-7 

GN-8 

GN-12 

ambient 

ambient 

ambient 

64 

64 

64 

64 

64 

64 

ambient 

64 

64 

65 

65 

65 

64 

63 

63 

63 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

GN-9 ambient 64 65 Yes 

GN-10 ambient 64 64 0 Yes 

GN-11 ambient 64 65 Yes 

64 65 Yes 

64 

64 

64 

64 

64 

ambient 

ambient 

ambient 

ambient 

ambient 

GN-13 63 

GN-14 63 

64 

65 

63 

64 

65 

ambient 

GN-15 (Mini HB) 

GN-16 (Mini HB) 

GN-17 

GN-18 (Mini HB) 

GN-19 (Mini HB) 

GN-20 (Mini HB) 

GN-21 

GN-22 (Mini HB) 

ambient 

64 

64 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

ambient 64 65 Yes 

ambient 64 65 Yes 

ambient 64 65 Yes 

Temperature tolerance within +1- 2 F of acceptable ranges for all thermocouples. 

Note: NIST Traceable Digital Thermometer Sedal Number 221243179 was used as reference temperature 

55 
G F S CHEMICALS, INC. 

Columbus, Ohio 43222 

LOT ANALYSIS 

ITEM: 828 ACETONE, REAGENT (ACS) LOT#: P780589 

TEST 

i. Assay (GLC) 99.5% min 

2. Residue after evaporation 0.001• 

3. Solubility in water Pass Test 

4. Titrable acid 0.0003 meq/g 

5. Titrable base 0.0006 meq/g 

PASS/ 

FAIL 

PASS 

PASS 

PASS 

PASS 

NUMERICAL 

RESULT 

99.99% 

<0.O01% 

passes 

<0.0003 meq/g 

<0.O005 meq/g 

6. Aldehyde (as HCHO) 0.0024 

7. Color (APHA) I0 max PASS <i0 

8. Isopropanol 0.05% PAS5 <0.054 

'ilMethanol 0.05% PASS <0.054 

i0. Substances reducing permanganate Pass Test PASS passes 

ii. •ater 0.5% PAS5 0.34% 

<0.002% 

TRACEABLE TO N.I.S.T. (Y/N)? N 

Comment: 

Reported by: Silaja Nacharaju C/A Print Date: 5/25/07 

QC Supervisor: Joan Plowman Quality Assured to Retest Point: 

Not for direct use in food, cosmetic or pharmaceuticals. 

Consult warranty limitations at www.gfschemlcals.com/terms.asp. 

For resale by GFS authorized distributors only. 

60 months 

from shipment 

56 
METTLER TOLEDO 

Service Business Unit Laboratory 

1900 Polaris Parkway 

Oolumbus, OH 43240 

Tel.: 1-800-MEI-rLER 

Balance Test Confirmation 

Customer 

Reference Weights 

All weights used for metrologioal testing are traceable to NIST. O•libration due dale for OIML class E2 is 

city 

Weight Set No. 

NIST Traceability No. 

Oalibrotion Date 

Traceability of Weights 

Procedure 

year, for OIML class F1 is 2 years from date of issue. 

All balances are metrologically tested and this form was completed in accordance with MEFrLER 

TOLEDO Work Instruction VW0111. 

Remarks 

Date 

Service Technician 

VFO011 

© by MEl-rLER TOLEDO 01/01 

This is an original document, copies are not retained by METTLER TOLEDO 

Page of 

5? 

Nomenclature and Test Calculations 

59 
An 

ACFM 

Bws 

Cs 

Ca 

Cp 

AH 

AP 

EA 

E/Btu 

F 

Kp 

Mn 

Md 

ebar 

Pg 

Prn 

PMR 

e std 

Qa 

astd 

TBws 

-['Vl c 

TVwstcl 

mm 

Tstd 

vm 

Vn 

Vma 

Vr.std 

vs 

Vwcstd 

Vwsgstd 

Wimp 

Wsg 

Y 

NOMENCLATURE 

Cross-sectional area of stack, square feet 

Cross-sectional area of nozzle, square feet 

Actual cubic feet of gas per minute at stack conditions 

Proportion by volume of water vapor in gas stream 

Particulate concentration in stack gas, gr/dscf 

Particulate concentration in stack gas, gr/acf 

Pitot tube coefficient 

Pressure drop across orifice meter, inches water 

Velocity head of stack gas, inches water 

Cubic feet of dry gas c.(•rrected to standard conditions 

Excess Air 

Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/mmBtu 

F-factor, 9640 dscf/MMBTU's of heat input 

Constant (85.49) 

Total particulate matter collected, mg 

Molecular weight of stack gas; dry basis, Ib/Ib-mole 

Molecular weight of stack gas; wet basis, Ib/Ib-mole 

Percent of isokinetic sampling 

Barometric pressure, inches mercury 

Stack static pressure, inches of water 

Barometric pressure of dry gas meter, in. mercury 

Particulate mass rate, pounds/hour 

Absolute stack gas pressure, inches mercury 

Barometric pressure, standard conditions, 29.92 inches Hg 

Volumetric flow rate, actual conditions, ACF/min 

Volumetric flow rate, standard conditions, scf/min 

Volumetric flow rate, dry standard conditions, dscf/min 

Theoretical water vapor in the gas stream based on saturated stack conditions, proportion 

by volume (dimensionless) 

Theoretical volume of water collected based on saturated stack conditions, ml 

Theoretical volume of water vapor in the gas sample based on saturated stack conditions, 

corrected to standard temperature and pressure, scf 

Absolute average dry gas meter temperature, degree R (460) 

Absolute average stack gas temperature, degree R (460) 

Absolute temperature at standard conditions, 528 R 

Total sampling time, minutes 

Total volume collected in impingers and silica gel, gr 

Volume of gas sampled through gas meter, cubic feet 

Volume collected at stack conditions through nozzle, ACF 

Stack gas volume sampled, ACF 

Volume of gas sampled through gas meter, cubic feet 

Average stack gas velocity, feet/sec 

Volume of water vapor in gas sampled from impingers, standard cubic feet 

Volume of water vapor in gas sampled from silica gel, standard cubic feet 

Total volume collected in impingers, gr 

Total volume collected in silica gel, gr 

Dry gas meter calibration factor 
TEST CALCULATIONS 

EQUATIONS 

1. P,=P,ar+(Pg/13.6) 2,•o4•5 + • 

• /13.6)= 

2. Pm=Pbar+(AH/13.6) Z•o•5 )+ •,Z• /13.6)= 

3. Vmstd=17.64*Vrn*Y*(Pm/Trn) 17.64"( 59o• )*( •.•4r 

4a. Vwc(std)=0.04706*Wimp 0.04706*( 7Go • )= 5o 

4b. Vwsg(std) 0.04715 Wsg 0.04715*( •5o 4 

5. Bw.=V.to/(Vms,o+Vws,ol 4.10 )// 

For saturated sources (No. 6 8 only): 

6. TB,•s (106"37" {2827/(ts*365)}/Ps 10637"{2827/( .364.8)}/( 

7. TVwst,• V •std TBws/1- TBws) )*( )/( 1 

8. -I'V•c TVwst•/0.04707 / 

10. 

Md= 0.44(%CO2)+0.32(%O2)+0.28((100-(%CO2+%O2)) 

0.44( '• )+0.32( |"• )+0.28(100-( •:• + )= 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

V•= 85.49 Cp* qzXP 4 [T, / (M,* P•)] 

Q•= V,* A, 60 (•%.l•q )( &7.•9• )(60)= •• 

Q,=Q,*(528•,)*(PE29.92) •bq )*(528/ •• )*(•.• /29.92)= •• 

Q,t, Qa (1- B•,) (528•,)*(P,/29.92) =( • )(1- •5• )*(528/ •,• )*( •.•/29.92) =• • 

C,=0.01543*(Mn/Vm,te) 0.01543*( [.6 / 3%R&• )= •7 

17. E/Btu= (CJ7000)*{(F•*20.9)/(20.9-%O2)} 

/7000)*{( )*20.9)/(20.9-( )} 

18. 

21. 

%EA= 100%* {(%OJ-0.5*(%CO)} {0.264(%N2) (%OJ+ 0.5*(%CO)} 

100%*{( )-0.5( )} / {0.264( )-( )+0.5( 

PMR= C,* Qs (60/7000) o•b•,•"l )*( •:l•"1J_ 1• )*(60/7000) 

22. Vn=T,/P,*{(0.002669) V,•+ (Vm Y Pm)/Tm)} 

Ca=0.01543" (M,/Vn) 0.01543*( / 

i=V, lOO/(60*e*v,*&) "Tb.&,•, )100/(60)( 

63.