alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Law, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.), rendered September 19, 1986, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*738The defendant contends that the hearing court erred when it concluded that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant. We disagree. Our holding in *People v Trim*(160 AD2d 825), where we considered the very same hearing record and rejected the same arguments when raised by the codefendant Houston Trim, is dispositive of the defendant’s contention in this case. The defendant has not raised any new arguments that would require a different result.

The defendant further contends that the People failed to prove that he knowingly and unlawfully possessed the cocaine found in the car which the codefendant was driving and in which the defendant was sleeping in the front passenger seat. Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in a light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the conviction. The People proved that the defendant was in the vehicle when the police observed and later seized the 4.415 ounces of cocaine which was in a plastic bag in open view on the front seat of the defendant’s vehicle *(see,*Penal Law § 220.21 [1]; § 220.25).

Furthermore, we find that the sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]), or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Siew Man Pang, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Health Care
      Corporation for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of China Health Care Corporation                                                                     

Dated: November 14, 2008



| | /s/
      Siew Man Pang       
| | ------------------------------
| | Siew Man Pang                 
| | Title: Chief Executive Officer
| | Principal Executive Officer   
| | China Health Care Corporation 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to China
Health Care Corporation and will be retained by China Health Care Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Wayne F.  Irmiter,  Vice  President  and  Controller  of Salton  Sea  Funding
Corporation   (the  "Company"),   certify,   pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  that to the best of my
knowledge:

     (1)  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company  for the annual  period
          ended  December  31,  2002  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated:   March 28, 2003




                                    /s/ Wayne F. Irmiter
                                    --------------------
                                    Wayne F. Irmiter
                                    Vice President and Controller
                                    (chief financial officer)
5worable John C. Marburger

countyAtiorney R?yette County IAGranr,a,.

Texas Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-d4ilO Re: Term of person appointed to i'ill vacancy inmembership of the Board of Trustees of La Grange Independent School District. We are in receipt of your recent communicationrequestingan opinion from this depurtme?t on the above statedmatter. The specific question submittedby you is: "If s vacancy occws by resignation on the Board of Trustees of the La Grange IndependentSchool District and such vacancy is filedby appointmentby the reollining

Board Members, does such appointee serve until the next Trustee Electlon or does he serve for the unes:>irid

term of the resignedmember? After carefuliy considering theprovisions of our statutes relating to the filling of vacancies in themem'Dership of aoards of **TrLISteeS** of independentSchocl Districts, it is our opinion that the provisionsof Article 27'7,Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, are applicable to the LaG-enge IndependentSchool District. :Jith-9erence to the filling of vacancies in the membershis oL boards of trustees of independentschool districts, 3ticl.e 2777, V. A. C. S., provides: "Themembers of theboard remaining after a vacancy shall fill khe same for the unexpired term."' in view of the foregoing, it is our opin:on thatwhen the Board of Trustees of La Grange IndependentSchool Di.strict;fills a vacancy in the membership of said Board by appointment, the appointee is entitled to serve for the unexpired term of his or her predecessor.Honorable John C. Marburger, page #2 o-6480

Trusting that the foregoing satisfactorilyanswers your inquiry,we remain Yours very truly ATTORNEY QXEZALOFTEXAS s/ J. A. Ellis

BY J. A. Ellis Assistant JAE:ddt/ldw APPROVED MkR.27, 1945 s/ Carlos C. Ashley FIRST ASSISTANT, AWORNEY GENERAL APPROVED OPINION COMMITTEE BY B. W. B. CHAIRMAN
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly report of Souvall-Page and Company, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), we, David C. Merrell, President and director, and Todd D.
Ross, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

Dated: 5/10/06                           /s/David C. Merrell
       -------                           ---------------------------
                                         David C. Merrell
                                         President and director

Dated: 5/10/06                           /s/Todd D. Ross
      --------                           ---------------------------
                                         Todd D. Ross
                                         Secretary/Treasurer and director
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Slattery, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), rendered March 2, 1989, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and criminal mischief in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, count two of the indictment, charging the defendant with criminal mischief in the second degree, is dismissed, without prejudice to the People to re-present any appropriate charges to another Grand Jury *(see, People v Beslanovics,*57 NY2d 726), and a new trial is ordered on the first count of the indictment. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

After both summations and just prior to the close of the penultimate day’s proceedings at the defendant’s trial, the court advised the defendant that he had been present during the entire trial and that the only thing left was the jury charge to be done the following day. The court warned the defendant that if he was not present "We’ll proceed without you”. The following morning, defense counsel advised the court that he had received a call from the defendant indicating that he had car trouble. The court responded that it too had received a call that the defendant had car trouble and that the defendant’s sister was going to pick him up and take him to the courthouse. However, the court declined to wait for the defendant’s arrival, and advised the jury that the defendant’s absence was not to be held against him. It then proceeded with the charge, during which the defendant entered the courtroom.

The defendant contends and the People concede that this *657constituted reversible error, mandating a new trial. Recently, in *People v Brooks*(75 NY2d 898), the Court of Appeals observed that before proceeding in a defendant’s absence, a trial court must have made inquiry and recited on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that the defendant’s absence was deliberate. The record at bar does not indicate that such inquiry was undertaken. In such circumstances, the court erred and the error is not subject to harmless error analysis *(see, People v Mehmedi,*69 NY2d 759).

Although the defendant was convicted of criminal mischief in the second degree, there was insufficient proof that the value of the property which was damaged exceeded $1,500 *(see,*Penal Law § 145.10). Since the proof did not suffice to substantiate criminal mischief in the second degree *(see, People v Gaines,*136 AD2d 731) the second count of the indictment, which charged this offense, is dismissed without prejudice to the People to re-present the charge of criminal mischief in the third degree, for which sufficient evidence was adduced to support a conviction, to another Grand Jury *(see, People v Beslanovics, supra).*

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1956 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzenamine, 4 Dodecyl. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzenamine, 4 Dodecyl. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENZENAMINE, 4 DODECYL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Benzenamine, 4 Dodecyl 

(CAS No. 104–42–7) (provided for in subheading 

2921.49.45) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1956 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32     Section 1350
Certifications.

---

# Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Beach First National Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The annual report of the Company for the period ending December 31, 2004 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/  Walter E. Standish, III
| |  | ----------------------------
| |  | Walter E. Standish, III     
| |  | Chief Executive Officer     
| |  | March 19, 2005              

| |  | /s/  Richard N. Burch  
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | Richard N. Burch       
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | March 19, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN WOLVERINE ENERGY 1998-1999 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC'S
10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         410,928
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               421,552
<PP&E>                                       2,581,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                     535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,002,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          425,459
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,576,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,002,108
<SALES>                                            884
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,159
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,315
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (68,156)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (68,156)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (68,156)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.6

SIXTH EXTENSION OF AMENDED AND RENEWED OPTION AGREEMENT

THIS FIFTH EXTENSION OF THE AMENDED AND RENEWED OPTION AGREEMENT is entered into as of the 1st day of January, 2009, by and
between The Hearst Corporation ("Hearst"), a Delaware corporation, and Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. (the "Company"), a Delaware corporation.

W I T N E S S E T H

WHEREAS, Hearst and the Company entered into an Amended and Renewed Option Agreement dated as of August 29, 2000 (the "Amended
and Renewed Option Agreement"); and

WHEREAS,
Hearst and the Company extended the Amended and Renewed Option Agreement pursuant to an initial Extension and subsequent Second Extension of the Amended and Renewed Option
Agreement; and

WHEREAS,
Hearst and the Company mutually desire to further extend the Amended and Renewed Option Agreement as set forth hereinafter;

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the Amended and Renewed Option Agreement is hereby amended and extended by substituting the date of December 31, 2009 for the date of August 31, 2004 in Section 1 of
the Amended and Renewed Option Agreement.

Except
as expressly set forth herein, all terms and conditions of the Amended and Renewed Option Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. Unless otherwise defined herein, all
capitalized terms shall have their respective meanings as set forth in the Amended and Renewed Option Agreement.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this extension of the Amended and Renewed Agreement as of the date first above written.

THE HEARST CORPORATION

HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.By:

/s/ RONALD J. DOERFLER

By:

/s/ JONATHAN C. MINTZERName:
Title:

Ronald J. Doerfler Sr. VP and CFO



Name:
Title:

Jonathan C. Mintzer Vice President, General Counsel andDated:

12/31/08





SecretaryDated:

12/31/08


---
Exhibit 23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-08990, 333-30304,333-57970, 333-70238, 333-107835, 333-114243, 333-115596, and 334-134808 on Form S-8 of our reportdated March 31, 2005, April 20, 2006 as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 20(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating tothe restatement discussed in Note 20), relating to the financial statements and financial statementschedule of Cray Inc., and subsidiaries appearing in Amendment No. 1to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Cray Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2006./s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPSeattle, Washington
Exhibit 32.1

Section 906 Certification

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NCI, Inc. (the Company)
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies,
to the best of his knowledge and belief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2006 |  | /s/ Charles K Narang                
|                     |  | Charles K. Narang                   
|                     |  | Chairman of the Board,              
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
|                     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)       

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NCI, Inc. and will be
retained by NCI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
31.2
 **SECTION
302 CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, James
L. Koenig, Acting Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 
 1.         
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The Amacore Group,
Inc.;
 
 2.         
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3.         
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4.         
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)         
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b)         
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
 c)         
Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;
 
 5.         
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a)         
All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b)         
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;
and
 
 6.         
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 
 Date: 
April 26, 2005
 /s/*James
      L.
      Koenig*
      James
      L. Koenig
      Acting
      Chief Financial Officer