alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2008051EN.01002601.xml

| 26.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 51/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 51/26

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 711/2006 of 20 March 2006 concerning the implementation of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the United States of America pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedules of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic in the course of their accession to the European Union, amending and supplementing Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 124 of 11 May 2006
  )

On page 7, in the Annex, footnote (2), CN code 2008 79 19 in the third column:

for:

‘
  2008 79 19: EUR 25,6 + 4,2/100 kg/net’,

read:

‘
  2008 70 19: EUR 25,6 + 4,2/100 kg/net’.

---
~~ Total Service Telecom, Inc., Exemption/Rulemaking 

Docket Folder Summary \il' View all documents and comments in this Docket 

Docket 10: FAA-2016-2900 Agency: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Parent Agency: Department of Transportation (DOT) 

Summary: 

Total service Telecom. Inc .• Exemption/Rulemaking 

- View Fewer Docket Details 

Docket Details 0 

Related RINs: None 

Related Dockets: None 

Disposition: Pending 

Primary Documents View All (2) 

Subty pe: Petition - section 333 

Type: Nonrulemaking 

U.S. DOT/FAA - Notice to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 Petitioners .. # 

Other Posted: 06ml2016 ID: FAA-2016-2900-{)002 

Total Service Telecom, Inc., Exemption/ Rulemaking # 

Other Posted: 0112BI2016 ID: FAA-2016-2900-{)001 

Total Service Telecom, Inc., Exemption/Rulemaking 

Docktt Foldtr umm.;~ry Q) Viow all documtnto 1nd commtntt In tlllo Oocbt 

Do cl<t iiD: FAA-2016·2900 Agency: Fe4eral AY13IIOR A4mlnl$lt3tiOn (FAA) 

Su~ry: 

T 1)131 SeMte Te-te' om Inc EJ<empuonJR\IJerT~ikltlg 

Dock~t ~n.ails 0 

Rtl•ttd RIN.: None 

Rtlattd Doekt ts: Nooo 

Dlspositton· · endJf\9 

Pnmary Documents VteWAI (2) 

Pa r.nt Agt ncy: DepartMent 01 Tran$POna:oon (00l) 

Su btypt: ~li!oon - setiiQfl 333 

Typ1: NonrutemaJang 

U S DOT/FAA- NotK:e lo Secl100 333 ollhe FAA ModemtZa~on alld Relorm Act ol2012 Pebltoners 

Ollltt 

Tolal Servtee Telecom Inc ExemplJOniRulemaklng 

Ottltr 10; FM-21111>-21100.0001 

Comment Period Closed 

a;.un,;;."IM 

'91!d.!i!iiiM
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory Rotelli, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Razor Resources Inc. for the period ended July 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Razor Resources Inc.

Dated: March September 19, 2011

/s/Gregory Rotelli

Gregory Rotelli President, Secretary and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) Razor Resources Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Razor Resources Inc. and will be retained by Razor Resources Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>






                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS









<PAGE>

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of InterWest Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated October 30,
1998, included in the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of InterWest Bancorp,
Inc. and subsidiaries.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and related Prospectuses of our report dated October 30, 1998, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of InterWest Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended September 30, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

         Registration
Form     Statement No.     Purpose
----     -------------     -------
<S>     <C>              <C>
S-8      33-99742          InterWest Bank 1984 Stock Option Plan
S-8      33-99742          InterWest Bancorp, Inc. 1993 Incentive & Non-
                           Incentive
                           Stock Option Plans for Outside Directors
S-8      333-13191         Central Bancorporation 1992 Employee Stock Option 
                           Plan & Central Bancorporation Director Stock Option
                           Plan
S-8      333-24525         InterWest Bancorp, Inc. 1996 Outside Directors 
                           Option-for-Fees Plan
S-8      333-65839         Kittitas Valley Bancorp 1996 Director Stock Option 
                           Plan & Kittitas Valley Bancorp Employee Stock Option
                           Plan
S-8      333-57679         Pacific Northwest Bank 1988 Stock Option Plan & 
                           Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. Amended And Restated Incentive
                           Stock Option Plan 
S-8      333-50685         First National Bank Of Port Orchard 1990 Employee &
                           Director Stock Option Plan

</TABLE>

Seattle, Washington
December 23, 1998
                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
EXHIBIT 5.2

Certification of Michael Doolan, Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Falconbridge Limited (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Michael Doolan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: March 29, 2005 |  |  |                                                        
|-------------------- |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | /s/MICHAEL DOOLANMichael Doolan
Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wade Harris, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), rendered September 16, 1987, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by denying his motion to substitute assigned counsel. Although the right to be represented by counsel of one’s own choosing is a valued one, an indigent defendant does not have the right to the appointment of successive lawyers absent a showing of good cause for the substitution *(see, People v Sides,*75 NY2d 822; *People v Sawyer,*57 NY2d 12, 18-19, *cert denied*459 US 1178). In this case, the defendant’s generalized assertion that assigned counsel was not "properly taking care of’ him, did not constitute such good cause *(see, People v Sawyer, supra; People v Thornton,*167 AD2d 935). Moreover, while the defendant further claimed that assigned counsel had failed to make a pretrial investigation or appropriate suppression motions, the court’s inquiry was sufficient to establish that these claims were groundless.

The defendant’s further challenge to the sufficiency of his plea allocution is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Pascale,*48 NY2d 997; *People v Esposito,*157 AD2d 850). In any event, upon our review of the record we find that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to a potential justification defense *(cf., People v Riley,*91 AD2d 671). Moreover, the defendant’s account of the stabbing of his victim spelled out the requisite elements of manslaughter in the first degree, and negated the prospect of a justification defense *(see, People v Carmona,*111 AD2d 930; *see also, People v Major,*116 AD2d 594; *People v Doctor,*98 AD2d 780).

Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive *(see, People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, and find either that they are not properly before this court *(see,*
      *487
      *People v Ghee,*153 AD2d 954), or are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Order entered August 30, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-21-00730-CV

IN RE LANDELL SHECKLES, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF-21-08491

ORDER Before Justices Osborne, Pe dersen, III, and Goldstein

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for

writ of mandamus.

/s / Bonnie Lee Goldstein
BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN
JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 23.1


Smart Choice Automotive Group, Inc.
Titusville, Florida

     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by  reference of our report dated
March 30,  1998,  relating to the  consolidated  financial  statements  of Smart
Choice Automotive  Group, Inc.  appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, into the Company's  previously  filed
Form S-3  Registration  Statements,  File Nos  333-39669  and 333-44455 and Post
Effective Amendment No. 4 on Form S-3 to Form SB-2 Registration Statement,  File
No. 33-96520-A.


                                   /s/ BDO Seidman
                                   ----------------
                                   BDO Seidman, LLP

Orlando, Florida
April 13, 1998
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2149 

To suspend temporarily the duty on orthotoluidine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. HARKIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on orthotoluidine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ORTHOTOLUIDINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Orthotoluidine (CAS No. 95– 

53–4) (provided for in subheading 2921.43.90) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2149 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Rahim Rayani, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Force Energy Corp.
for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Force Energy Corp.

Dated: July 21, 2008.

*/s/ Rahim Rayani*Rahim RayaniChief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Force Energy
Corp. and will be retained by Force Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7161

NEHEMIAH POPE, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

FRANKLIN FREEMAN; TOM MARTIN, Warden,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-97-162-H)

Submitted: November 12, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nehemiah Pope, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Nehemiah Pope, Jr. appeals the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). In 1994, Pope was convicted of second degree murder

in North Carolina state court and sentenced to fifty years' imprisonment for the shooting death of Deputy Sheriff Futrell. See State

v. Pope, 468 S.E.2d 552 (N.C. Ct. App. 1996). In his petition,

Pope claims that the trial judge erred by: (1) finding as an aggravating factor at sentencing that the offense was committed against

a law enforcement officer while in the performance of his employment; (2) commenting on the evidence; and (3) allowing the State to

impeach Pope with extrinsic evidence. The district court adopted

the magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation to dismiss the

petition. In his memorandum and recommendation, the magistrate

judge concluded that claims (1) and (3) were procedurally barred

and claim (2) failed on the merits. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion adopting the magistrate judge's

memorandum and recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# L_2006026EN.01000701.xml

| 31.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 26/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 26/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 163/2006

of 30 January 2006

amending the rates of refunds applicable to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular Article 27(5)(a) and (15) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The rates of the refunds applicable from 20 January 2006 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The rates of the refunds applicable from 20 January 2006 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 (2).

| (2) | It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained in Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present applicable should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained in Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present applicable should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of refund fixed by Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 are hereby altered as shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 31 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 January 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 15, 20.1.2006, p. 32.

2

---

ANNEX

Rates of refunds applicable from 31 January 2006 to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (1)

| CN code | Description | Rate of refund in EUR/100 kg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| In case of advance fixing of refunds | Other |
| 1701 99 10 | White sugar | 26,02 | 26,02 |

CN code

Description

Rate of refund in EUR/100 kg

In case of advance fixing of refunds

Other

1701 99 10

White sugar

26,02

26,02

---

(1)  The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004, to Romania with effect from 1 December 2005, and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein with effect from 1 February 2005.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Stefan A. Bird,  President of Salton Sea Funding Corporation (the "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company  for the annual  period
          ended  December  31,  2003  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated:   February 27, 2004



                               /s/ Stefan A. Bird
                               ------------------
                                 Stefan A. Bird
                                    President
                            (chief executive officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
TORO VENTURES INC.
FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph Arcaro, am the Chief Executive
Officer of Toro Ventures Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the six month period ended December 31, 2009 and filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|Date: June 17, 2013                                                                     
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: /s/ Joseph Arcaro
        Joseph Arcaro
        Chief Financial Officer and Director
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2121 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2121

   To suspend temporarily the duty on double-fan assisted, plug-in, 
           scented oil dispensing, electrothermic appliances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

   Mr. Kohl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on double-fan assisted, plug-in, 
           scented oil dispensing, electrothermic appliances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DOUBLE-FAN ASSISTED, PLUG-IN, SCENTED OIL DISPENSING, 
              ELECTROTHERMIC APPLIANCES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Double-fan          Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        assisted, plug-                                                    31/2011.......
                        in, scented oil
                        dispensing,
                        [electrothermic]
                        appliances made
                        of polymeric
                        materials and
                        having an overall
                        height between 18
                        and 21 mm
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8516.79.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```