alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008049DE.01004901.xml

| 22.2.2008 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 49/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2008

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 49/49

---

Berichtigung der Interinstitutionellen Vereinbarung zwischen dem Europäischen Parlament, dem Rat und der Europäischen Kommission über die Haushaltsdisziplin und die wirtschaftliche Haushaltsführung

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 139 vom 14. Juni 2006
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 139 vom 14. Juni 2006

(2008/C 49/13)

Im Inhalt und auf Seite 1, Titel:

anstatt:

„Interinstitutionelle Vereinbarung zwischen dem Europäischen Parlament, dem Rat und der Europäischen Kommission über die Haushaltsdisziplin und die wirtschaftliche Haushaltsführung“

muss es heißen:

„Interinstitutionelle Vereinbarung zwischen dem Europäischen Parlament, dem Rat und der Kommission über die Haushaltsdisziplin und die wirtschaftliche Haushaltsführung“.

Seite 1, verfügende Organe:

anstatt:

„DAS EUROPÄISCHE PARLAMENT, DER RAT UND DIE KOMMISSION DER EUROPÄISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN“

muss es heißen:

„DAS EUROPÄISCHE PARLAMENT, DER RAT DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION UND DIE KOMMISSION DER EUROPÄISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN“.

Seite 3, Nummer 22 Absatz 2:

anstatt:

„Jeder Beschluss über eine Änderung des Finanzrahmens, durch den sich der Spielraum für unvorhergesehene Ausgaben um mehr als 0,03 % des BNE der Europäischen Union ändert, wird von beiden Teilen der Haushaltsbehörde gemäß Nummer 3 gefasst.“

muss es heißen:

„Jeder Beschluss über eine Änderung des Finanzrahmens, durch den sich der Spielraum für unvorhergesehene Ausgaben um bis zu 0,03 % des BNE der Europäischen Union ändert, wird von beiden Teilen der Haushaltsbehörde gemäß Nummer 3 gefasst.“

Seite 3, Nummer 25 Absatz 2 Satz 1:

anstatt:

„Diese Mittel werden als Rücklagen in den Gesamthaushaltsplan der Europäischen Union eingestellt.“

muss es heißen:

„Diese Mittel werden als vorläufig eingesetzte Mittel in den Gesamthaushaltsplan der Europäischen Union eingestellt.“

Seite 4, Nummer 28 Absatz 3:

anstatt:

„Nachdem die Kommission festgestellt hat, dass ausreichende Spielräume und/oder in Abgang gestellte Mittel gemäß Absatz 2 verfügbar sind, werden die betreffenden Mittel umgehend als Rückstellung in den Gesamthaushaltsplan der Europäischen Union eingesetzt.“

muss es heißen:

„Nachdem die Kommission festgestellt hat, dass ausreichende Spielräume und/oder in Abgang gestellte Mittel gemäß Absatz 2 verfügbar sind, werden die betreffenden Mittel umgehend als vorläufig eingesetzte Mittel in den Gesamthaushaltsplan der Europäischen Union eingesetzt.“

---
EX-4.5



 




Exhibit 4.5 


CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

OF

PNC CAPITAL TRUST G,

A DELAWARE STATUTORY TRUST




     This Certificate of Trust of PNC Capital Trust G (the “Trust”) is being duly executed and
filed for the purpose of forming a statutory trust pursuant to the Delaware Statutory Trust Act 12
Del. Code §3801 et seq.



     1.   NAME. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is PNC Capital Trust G.



     2.   DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust having its
principal place of business in the State of Delaware are:


The Bank of New York (Delaware)

White Clay Center

Route 273

Newark, DE 19711





     3.   EFFECTIVE
DATE. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective immediately upon filing in
the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned, being the sole trustee of the Trust, does hereby execute
this Certificate of Trust as of the 9 day of January, 2007.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE BANK OF NEW YORK
(DELAWARE),
not in its individual capacity but solely
as Delaware
Trustee

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Kristine
K. Gullo	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Title 	Vice
President
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350,


Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Smart Balance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Form
10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 6, 2009
              By:
              /s/Stephen B. HughesStephen
      B. HughesChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      executive officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of CheckFree Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Peter J. Kight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: September 2, 2005                 /s/ Peter J. Kight
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Peter J. Kight
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                        CheckFree Corporation



This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 32



906 CERTIFICATION



The
undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



(1) The accompanying Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in
the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November 27, 2007
        
        
        /s/ David H. RochePresident and Chief Executive Officer






/s/ Steven M. CaspersExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer






---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.11

                                  AMENDMENT TWO
                                     TO THE
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         THIS AMENDMENT TWO, dated May 1, 2003, to the Employment Agreement
dated September 1, 1999, as amended May 1, 2001 (the "Agreement") between World
Airways, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("World" or the "Company"), and Randy
Martinez ("Martinez").

         WHEREAS, the Agreement has a provision governing the rights and
remedies of the parties in the event of a Change of Control of the Company that
has always been intended to allow Martinez to terminate the Agreement, at his
election, in the event of a Change of Control; and

         WHEREAS, that intent may not be clearly articulated in the current
language of the Agreement; and

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has resolved that it is in the best
interests of the Company to amend the Agreement to clarify the intent.

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the Parties do hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

    1.   By inserting the following words and punctuation immediately following
         the provision of Paragraph 5(e)(vii): "or, with or without Martinez's
         consent," and

    2.   By inserting the words "or Change of Control" in Paragraph 5(e)(viii)
         after the words "liquidation or dissolution" and before the words "of
         World prior to the end of this Agreement."

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment Number
Two as of the date and year first above written.

                                                        WORLD AIRWAYS, INC.

                                                        By: /s/ Hollis L. Harris
                                                            --------------------
                                                            Hollis L. Harris
                                                            Chairman and CEO

                                                            /s/ Randy Martinez
                                                            --------------------
                                                            Randy Martinez
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1264

_____________________________

SHERMAN LEE HUGHLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

April 30, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell Dixon,

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1939 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify presumptions relating 

to the exposure of certain veterans who served in the vicinity of the 

Republic of Vietnam, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 27, 2009 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. TESTER, 

and Ms. LANDRIEU) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify presumptions relating to the exposure of certain veterans who 

served in the vicinity of the Republic of Vietnam, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agent Orange Equity 

5 Act of 2009’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1939 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PRESUMPTIONS OF EXPOSURE 

2 FOR VETERANS WHO SERVED IN THE VICIN3 ITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM. 

4 (a) CLARIFICATION.—Section 1116 of title 38, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in subsections (a)(1) and (f), by striking ‘‘a 

7 veteran who, during active military, naval, or air 

8 service, served in the Republic of Vietnam during 

9 the period beginning on January 9, 1962, and end10 ing on May 7, 1975’’ and inserting ‘‘a veteran de11 scribed in subsection (g)’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub13 section: 

14 ‘‘(g) A veteran described in this subsection is a vet15 eran who— 

16 ‘‘(1) during active military, naval, or air serv17 ice— 

18 ‘‘(A) served in the Republic of Vietnam 

19 (including the inland waterways, ports, and har20 bors of such Republic, the waters offshore of 

21 such Republic, and the airspace above such Re22 public) during the period beginning on January 

23 9, 1962, and ending on May 7, 1975; or 

24 ‘‘(B) served in Johnston Island during the 

25 period beginning on April 1, 1972, and ending 

26 on September 30, 1977; or 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1939 IS

1 ‘‘(2) received the Vietnam Service Medal or the 

2 Vietnam Campaign Medal.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) shall take effect as of September 25, 1985. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officersof Argyle Security, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2008 of the Company fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | November 14, 2008 | /s/ Bob Marbut         |
|--------|------------------------|-----------------------------|
|   |                   | Name:                       | Bob Marbut |
|   |                   | Title:                      | Co-Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |                   |                        |
|   |                   |                        |
| Dated: | November 14, 2008 | /s/ Ron Chaimovski     |
|   |                   | Name:                       | Ron Chaimovski |
|   |                   | Title:                      | Co-Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |                   |                        |
|   |                   |                        |
| Dated: | November 14, 2008 | /s/ Donald F.  Neville |
|   |                   | Name:                       | Donald F. Neville |
|   |                   | Title:                      | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                   |                        |
|   |                   |                        |
| Dated: | November 14, 2008 | /s/ Dean  A. Dresser   |
|   |                   | Name:                       | Dean A. Dresser |
|   |                   | Title:                      | Vice President and  Corporate Controller |

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 
**- 7684** 

RAYMOND V. BETHEL, JR. ,
Petitioner

– Appellant ,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:13

- cv
- 00013

- HEH )

Submitted : December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD , Circuit Ju dges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Raymond V. Bethel, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
For the second time, Raymond V. Bethel, Jr., seeks to
appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition for failure to exhaust
state court remedies. As our previous decision in No. 13

- 7615
dismissed Bethel’s appeal from the sa me order and judgment, we
dismiss the present appeal as duplicative. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

DIS MISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arturo Cortes, Also Known as Arturo Cortez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), rendered August 7, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him as a second felony offender to an indeterminate prison term of from six to twelve years, unanimously affirmed.

The complainant testified that within a one month period after he was robbed by the defendant, he conducted his own investigation and saw the defendant on three separate occasions in front of 234 East 178th Street in The Bronx. During his final observation, the complainant summoned the police and identified defendant as the perpetrator of the robbery.

The testimony regarding the complainant’s out-of-court identification was admissible because the identification was initiated by the complainant and suggestive police procedures were not utilized *(People v Malone,*169 AD2d 564). Defendant’s argument that the testimony regarding the complainant’s investigation constituted improper bolstering is unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, it is well settled that improper bolstering occurs when a third party testifies to another witness’s prior identification *(People v Miller,*156 AD2d 142), which is not the case in the instant matter.

*320Defendant’s argument that the prosecutor’s improper summation comments deprived him of a fair trial must be rejected since the court alleviated any prejudice by giving curative instructions *(People v Santiago,*52 NY2d 865, 866). Defendant failed to object to the prosecutor’s comment that "holding a person accountable for his or her actions is a fundamental principle of any community”, which, in any case, was responsive to defense counsel’s suggestion that it would be a frightening thought to convict defendant (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Bailey,*155 AD2d 262).

Finally, the court took appropriate action by sending the jury back to deliberate after a single polled juror answered "no” when asked if her verdict was guilty (CPL 310.80). Although defendant now argues that the court should have followed the procedure suggested in *People v Pickett*(61 NY2d 773), by conducting an inquiry of this juror out of the presence of the jury, defendant’s counsel explicitly objected to and rejected this suggested procedure, thereby waiving the issue for appellate review *(People v Waytes,*107 AD2d 774). Concur —Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2016169DE.01001801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 28.6.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 169/18 |

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2006/126/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 20. Dezember 2006 über den Führerschein

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 403 vom 30. Dezember 2006](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2006_403_R_TOC)
)

Auf Seite 21, Artikel 4 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a, „Klasse B1“, erster Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „— | vierrädrige Kraftfahrzeuge im Sinne des Artikels 1 Absatz 3 Buchstabe b der Richtlinie 2000/24/EG;“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „— | vierrädrige Kraftfahrzeuge im Sinne des Artikels 1 Absatz 3 Buchstabe b der Richtlinie 2002/24/EG;“. |

Auf Seite 24, Artikel 6 Absatz 3 Buchstabe a:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „a) | dreirädrige Kraftfahrzeuge mit einer Leistung von mehr als 15 kW fallen unter den Führerschein der Klasse B, sofern der Inhaber dieses Führerscheins mindestens das 21. Lebensjahr vollendet hat;“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „a) | dreirädrige Kraftfahrzeuge fallen unter den Führerschein der Klasse B; für dreirädrige Kraftfahrzeuge mit einer Leistung von mehr als 15 kW ist das Mindestalter 21 Jahre;“. |

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darron Huggins, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Savarese, J.), rendered February 6, 1989, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was denied his statutory right to a speedy trial. We disagree. The periods of delay directly resulting from the defendant’s pretrial motion are not chargeable to the People *(see,*CPL 30.30 [4] [a], [b]; *People v Worley,*66 NY2d 523, 527; *People v Erts,*141 AD2d 665), nor are the delays to which the defendant failed to object, including the 41 days between the defendant’s arraignment and his first scheduled court date which the trial court erroneously attributed to the People *(see, People v Pappas,*128 AD2d 556; *People v Gaggi,*104 AD2d 422). The total time properly chargeable to the People in this case was within the permitted six calendar months *(see, e.g., People v Jones,*105 AD2d 179, 188, *affd*66 NY2d 529). Accordingly, the defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to CPL 30.30 was properly denied.

Finally, we conclude that certain statements made by the prosecutor during his summation do not warrant reversal. The proof of the defendant’s guilt on the reckless endangerment charge was overwhelming and, given his acquittal on the other two charges, there was no significant probability that *646the complained-of remarks affected the jury’s verdict *(see, People v Scott,*138 AD2d 421). Kunzeman, J. P., Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, March 23, 2012, 9 a.m. to March 23, 2012, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 17, 2012, FR 2012-3784.                

This meeting will be held on March 21-22, 2012 instead of March 23, 2012. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: March 2, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-5822 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P