alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006311EN.01002901.xml

| 10.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 311/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/29

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1660/2006

of 9 November 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 3 to 9 November 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 November 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 November 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
<PAGE>









                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



<PAGE>

Parent
------
InterWest Bancorp, Inc.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                Jurisdiction or
                                                              Percentage                             State of
Subsidiaries (a)                                             of Ownership                       Incorporation
----------------                                             ------------                       ---------------
<S>                                                       <C>                               <C>
InterWest Bank                                                   100%                             Washington

Pacific Northwest Bank                                           100%                             Washington

Pioneer National Bank                                            100%                             Washington

Kittitas Valley Bank N.A.                                        100%                             Washington

InterWest Financial Services, Inc. (b)                           100%                             Washington

InterWest Insurance Agency, Inc. (c)                              70%                             Washington

InterWest Properties, Inc. (b)                                   100%                             Washington

I & B, Inc. (b)                                                  100%                             Washington

</TABLE>

(a)      The operation of InterWest Bancorp's wholly owned subsidiaries are
         included in InterWest Bancorp's Financial Statements contained in the
         Annual Report attached hereto as Exhibit 13.

(b)      Wholly-owned subsidiary of InterWest Bank.

(c)      Interest owned by InterWest Bank.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7921

KENYA LASHAN MARTIN,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00128-RLV)

Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenya Lashan Martin, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenya Lashan Martin, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Martin v. United States, No. 5:13-cv-00128-

RLV (W.D.N.C. Nov. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

WORD TO INFO, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

FACEBOOK INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________ 

2017-1431

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 3:15-cv-03485-

WHO, Judge William H. Orrick, III.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MICHAEL D. SAUNDERS, Farney Daniels, PC, San 

Mateo, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JONATHAN DANIEL BAKER; STEVEN R. DANIELS,

WILLIAM BRYAN FARNEY, Georgetown, TX. 

 HEIDI LYN KEEFE, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued 

for defendant-appellee. Also represented by LOWELL D.

MEAD, MARK R. WEINSTEIN. 

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 8, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.6.3

                        ALPHA SECURITY GROUP CORPORATION
                              328 West 77th Street
                            New York, New York 10024

                                                                January 16, 2007

Mr. Steven M. Wasserman
328 West 77th Street
New York, New York 10024

Dear Mr. Wasserman:

         By signing and dating this letter where indicated below, you hereby
agree with Alpha Security Group Corporation ("Alpha") as follows:

         1.       You shall loan to Alpha, upon Alpha's request, up to Two
                  Hundred Thousand ($200,000) Dollars (the "Loan"), in addition
                  to any and all sums previously advanced by you to Alpha, to be
                  utilized by Alpha for the payment of costs and expenses
                  associated with the offer and sale by Alpha of 6,000,000
                  shares of its common stock in a public offering underwritten
                  by Maxim Group LLC and I-Banker Securities, Inc. (the
                  "Offering").

         2.       No interest shall accrue on the unpaid principal balance of
                  the Loan.

         3.       The principal balance of this Loan shall be repayable on the
                  earlier of (i) June 30, 2007 or (ii) the date on which Alpha
                  consummates the Offering, from proceeds of the Offering not
                  placed in trust, as set forth in the Registration Statement on
                  Form S-1 relating to the Offering.

         4.       This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and
                  enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York,
                  without regard to the principles of conflicts of laws.

         5.       Any provision contained in this Agreement which is prohibited
                  or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such
                  jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition
                  or unenforceability without invalidating the remaining
                  provisions hereof, and any such prohibition or
                  unenforceability in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate or
                  render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction.


                                                 ALPHA SECURITY GROUP
                                                 CORPORATION


                                                 By: /s/ Robert B. Blaha
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Robert B. Blaha
                                                     Chief Management Officer
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

/s/ Steven M. Wasserman
-----------------------------
Steven M. Wasserman
Date: January 16, 2007
# L_2006026EN.01002801.xml

| 31.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 26/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 26/28

---

COUNCIL COMMON POSITION 2006/51/CFSP

of 30 January 2006

renewing restrictive measures against Zimbabwe

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 15 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 19 February 2004, the Council adopted Common Position 2004/161/CFSP (1) renewing restrictive measures against Zimbabwe for a period of 12 months from 21 February 2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 19 February 2004, the Council adopted Common Position 2004/161/CFSP (1) renewing restrictive measures against Zimbabwe for a period of 12 months from 21 February 2004.

| (2) | Council Common Position 2005/146/CFSP (2), adopted on 21 February 2005, extended Common Position 2004/161/CFSP until 20 February 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Council Common Position 2005/146/CFSP (2), adopted on 21 February 2005, extended Common Position 2004/161/CFSP until 20 February 2006.

| (3) | In view of the situation in Zimbabwe, Common Position 2004/161/CFSP should be extended for a further period of 12 months, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In view of the situation in Zimbabwe, Common Position 2004/161/CFSP should be extended for a further period of 12 months,

HAS ADOPTED THIS COMMON POSITION:

Article 1

Common Position 2004/161/CFSP shall be extended until 20 February 2007.

Article 2

This Common Position shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Article 3

This Common Position shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 January 2006.

For the Council

The President

U. PLASSNIK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 50, 20.2.2004, p. 66.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 49, 22.2.2005, p. 30.

2

---
Exhibit32.1

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Charles E.Johnson, the chief executive officer of Proliance International, Inc.(the ‘‘issuer’’), does hereby certify that thereport on Form 10-K accompanying this certification (the‘‘report’’) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in thereport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the issuer.

/s/ Charles E.Johnson                                Charles E. Johnson President and Chief Executive Officer (chiefexecutive officer) Proliance International, Inc. March 31,2006

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 25, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41077

Conference Calendar

JON RAYMOND CARRIGAN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:05-CV-76

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jon Raymond Carrigan, federal prisoner # 26552-177, has

filed a request for a certificate of probable cause, which is now

known as a certificate of appealability (COA), to appeal the

district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. 

Carrigan challenges his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to

possess pseudoephedrine with the intent to manufacture

methamphetamine. The district court dismissed the petition

because Carrigan did not qualify to proceed under the “savings
No. 05-41077

-2-

clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Because Carrigan is a federal

prisoner seeking to proceed under § 2241, he is not required to

obtain a COA. See Jeffers v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th

Cir. 2001). 

Carrigan does not address the basis for the district court’s

conclusion that his § 2241 petition should be dismissed. 

Although pro se briefs are liberally construed, even pro se

litigants must brief arguments to preserve them. Yohey v.

Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Because Carrigan

has not addressed the basis for the district court’s dismissal of

his § 2241 petition, he has abandoned any argument that the

district court erred when it dismissed his § 2241 petition for

lack of jurisdiction. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy

Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). 

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1703 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1703

  To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the 
  Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian tribes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2009

Mr. Dorgan (for himself, Mr. Tester, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Baucus, 
Mr. Udall of New Mexico, Mr. Bingaman, and Mr. Franken) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the 
  Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian tribes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION.

    (a) In General.--Section 19 of the Act of June 18, 1934 (commonly 
known as the ``Indian Reorganization Act'') (25 U.S.C. 479), is 
amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``The term'' and inserting 
                ``Effective beginning on June 18, 1934, the term''; and
                    (B) by striking ``any recognized Indian tribe now 
                under Federal jurisdiction'' and inserting ``any 
                federally recognized Indian tribe''; and
            (2) by striking the third sentence and inserting the 
        following: ``In this section, the term `Indian tribe' means any 
        Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, 
        or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to 
        exist as an Indian tribe.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the Act of June 18, 1934 (commonly known 
as the ``Indian Reorganization Act'') (25 U.S.C. 479), on the date of 
enactment of that Act.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.1



 





Exhibit 10.1




Summary of Base Salaries

for

Executive Officers of Park National Corporation




     On January 18, 2005, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors
of Park National Corporation (“Park”) approved the base salaries for each of the executive officers
of Park: (a) C. Daniel DeLawder, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Park and The
Park National Bank, a subsidiary of Park; (b) David L. Trautman, President and Secretary of Park
and President of The Park National Bank; and (c) John W. Kozak, Chief Financial Officer of Park and
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Park National Bank, for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005 (the “2005 fiscal year”). The Compensation Committee also recommended that
the cash compensation paid to these three executive officers during the 2005 fiscal year be split
at 50% base salary and 50% incentive compensation. Messrs. DeLawder, Trautman and Kozak
historically had received the majority of their total cash compensation in incentive compensation.
The Compensation Committee reviewed independently generated peer group information of similarly
sized bank holding companies developed by SNL Securities which revealed that the individuals
holding these positions typically receive a majority of their cash compensation in base salary. To
be more consistent with peers, and at the suggestion of the management of Park and The Park
National Bank, the Compensation Committee considered and then approved a 50/50 split between base
salary and cash incentive compensation. Management also suggested that Messrs. DeLawder and
Trautman receive no increase in the aggregate amount of cash compensation paid during the 2005
fiscal year, but that the proportion of total cash compensation allocated to base salary and
incentive compensation for the 2005 fiscal year should change. Management suggested, and the
Compensation Committee concurred after reviewing peer data, to increase Mr. Kozak’s total cash
compensation. Accordingly, the base salaries for the 2005 fiscal year were $464,240 for Mr.
DeLawder, $307,108 for Mr. Trautman and $200,500 for Mr. Kozak.



     On February 7, 2006, the Compensation Committee approved the base salaries for each of Messrs.
DeLawder, Trautman and Kozak for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the “2006 fiscal year”).
Management suggested that Messrs. DeLawder, Trautman and Kozak receive the same base salary for the
2006 fiscal year as they had received for the 2005 fiscal year and the Compensation Committee
concurred after reviewing independently generated peer group information of similarly sized bank
holding companies developed by SNL Securities.



     On December 27, 2006, the Compensation Committee determined the base salaries for each of
Messrs. DeLawder, Trautman and Kozak for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. Effective
January 1, 2007, those base salaries are the following:




	 	*	 	C. Daniel DeLawder — $473,525
	 
	 	*	 	David L. Trautman — $313,250
	 
	 	*	 	John W. Kozak — $214,455
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2032 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2032

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on p-Methylacetophenone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on p-Methylacetophenone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. P-METHYLACETOPHENONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.38 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to p-Methylacetophenone) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2070 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2070

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on phenyl (4,6-dimethoxy-
                       pyrimidin-2-yl) carbamate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on phenyl (4,6-dimethoxy-
                       pyrimidin-2-yl) carbamate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHENYL (4,6-DIMETHOXY-PYRIMIDIN-2-YL) CARBAMATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.33.59 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to phenyl (4,6-dimethoxy-
pyrimidin-2-yl) carbamate) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```