1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004

- 2595  p202 624

- 2500  f202 628

- 5116

Gerald F. Murphy

(202) 50 8

- 8855

gmurphy@crowell.com

August 3 , 2015

VIA FDMS

Ms. Cheryl Collins

Program Manager, Docket Operations

Docket Management Facility

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140

Attn: FAA Dockets

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Skytec LLC

– Petition for Exemption

Dear Ms. Collins :

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (“FMRA”) 1

and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Skytec LLC (“ Skytec ”)

, petitions for an exemption from the Federal

Aviation Regulations identified herein to authorize Skytec to operate small unmanned aircraft

systems (“sUAS”) for aerial data collection

. 2 Skytec ’ s sUAS o perations will be conducted under

the safeguards described in this petition and as may be further established by FAA.

FAA has now issued over 900 Section 333 exemptions to various commercial enterprises

for sUAS applications ranging from aerial photography and cinematography to precision

agriculture and flare stack, bridge and tower inspections. 3 Indeed, FAA has granted hundreds

of Section 333 exemption s for aerial data collection in circumstances that are simila r in all

material respects to those propose d here. 4 In issuing those exemption s and other S ection 333

g rants

, FAA found that “the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with

1 Pub. L. No. 112

- 95, § 333, 126 Stat. 76.

2 This exemption request is based on the information provided in this petition and the user

manuals for Skytec ’s DJI Inspire 1, DJI Phantom 2 +, DJI Phantom 3 Professional and Aeryon SkyRanger sUAS

(collectively, the “Manuals”)

, copies of which are already on file with FAA. See, e.g., In the Matter of the Petition

of 360 Productions, LLC

, Grant of Exemption No. 11901 (Jun. 25, 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1313 (DJI Phantom 2

and Inspire 1); In the Matter of the Petition of Shick Web Design, LLC, Grant of Exemption No. 12179 ( Jul. 28

, 2015),

Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1718 ( DJI Phantom 3 ); and In t he Matter of the Petition of Sustainment Solutions, Inc.

, Grant

of Exemption No. 11903 (Jun. 25, 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1217 (Aeryon SkyRanger)

.

3 See FAA, Authorizations Granted Via Section 333 Exemptions (rev. Jul. 31 , 2015),

https://www.faa.gov/uas/legislative_programs/section_333/333_authorizations/

.

4 See, e.g., In the Matter of the Petition of Vertical Access LLC , Grant of Exemption No. 11943 (Jun.

30 , 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1406 (“Exemption No. 11943 ”) ; In the Matter of the Petition of RTI Group , LLC,

Grant of Exemption No. 11946 ( Jun

. 30 , 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1455 (“Exemption No. 11946 ”); and In the

Ma tter of the Petition of Mission Geospatial Ltd

. , Grant of Exemption No. 11956 ( Jun. 30 , 2015), Docket No. FAA

2015

- 1411 (“Exemption No. 11956 ”)

.FAA Dockets

A ugust 3

, 2015

Page 2

the specificati ons described by the petitioner

... gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS

operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest

. ” 5 The same public interest and

safety justifica tions apply to Skytec ’s petition, and should enable FAA to grant it on an

expedited basis.

I. Petitioner

Founded in March 2015

, Skytec provides aerial data mapping and imaging solutions for

asset and resource management, validation, emergency response, and 3D visualization.

Specializing in geospatial data collection and geographic information system implementation,

Skytec provides turnkey data collection, analysis, and decision support solutions.

All communications regarding Skytec ’s petition should be directed to:

Andrew Carroll

Skytec LLC

332 Montlake Rd.

Soddy Daisy, TN 37379

- 4558

acarroll@skytecllc.com w ith a copy to: Gerald F. Murphy

Crowell & Moring LLP

1001 Pennsylvania Ave NW

Washington, DC 20004

gmurphy@crowell.com

II. Section 333

Skytec ’s petition is consistent with Congress’ s goal set forth in Section 333 of the FMRA,

which directs the Secretary of Transportation to consider whether certain UAS may operate

safely in the national airspace system ( “ NAS ” ) before completion of the rulemaking s required

under Section 332 of th at legislation

. In making this determination, the Secretary is required to

determine which types of UAS do not create a hazard to u sers of the NAS or the public or pose

a threat to national security in light of the following: (1 ) t he UAS’ size, weight, speed, and

operational capability; (2 ) o peration of the UAS in close proximity to airports and populated

areas; and (3 ) o peration of the UAS within visual line of sight of the operator. 6 To implement

Section 333, FAA has the authority to issue exemptions from its safety regulations and

minimum standards when the Administrator decides a requested exemption is in the public

interest. 7

Skytec ’ s proposed s UAS operations meet the requirements of, and qualify for expedited

approval under, Section 333. Skytec ’ s sUAS weigh less than 55 pound s , will operate at less than

400 feet above ground level ( “ AGL ” )

, within visual line of sight ( “ VLOS ” )

, at speeds of no more

than 87 knots, and will generally comply with the same conditions and limitations FAA

established in issuing previous Section 333 g rants

. 8 Operations conducted under these

5 See, e.g., Exemption No. 11943 at 2; Exemption No. 11946 at 2; and Exemption No. 11956 at 2.

6 FMRA § 333(a).

7 See 49 U.S.C. § 106(f) and 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f).

8 See supra note 3

.FAA Dockets

A ugust 3

, 2015

Page 3

safeguards will provide at least an equivalent level of safety compared to the current regulatory

structure. Moreover, Skytec ’ s operations will not “create a hazard to users of the national

airspace system or the public or pose a threat to national securi ty” due to the size of the sUAS

and the restricted areas in which they will operate. 9

III. Regulations from Which an Exemption is Requested

Skytec requests an exemption from the following regulations to the extent necessary for

Skytec to conduct the operations described in this petition :

 14 C.F.R. § § 61.23(a) and (c)

 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.101(e)(4) and (5)

 14 C

. F

. R

. § 61.113(a)

 14 C

. F

. R

. § 61. 315 (a)

 14 C.F.R. § 91. 7(a)

 14 C.F.R. § 91.119 (c)

 14 C.F.R. § 91.121

 14 C

. F

. R . § 91.151(a) (1)

 14 C

. F

. R . § 91.405(a)

 14 C

. F

. R . § 91. 407(a)(1)

 14 C

. F

. R . §§ 91. 409(a) (1) and (2)

 14 C

. F

. R . §§ 91. 417(a) and (b)

The following subsections describe Skytec ’s request for an exemption from each of

these regulations and demonstrate how Skytec ’ s operations will provide for at least an

equivalent level of safety compared to the current regulatory structure that applies to manned

aircraft

.

A. 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.23(a) and (c)

– Medical certificates: Requirement and

duration

Sections 61.23(a) and (c) generally require pilots of manned aircraft to hold a FAA

medical certificate in ord er to exercise pilot privileges

. As of March 24, 2015, however, FAA

determined as a matter of policy that operators hold ing a valid driver’s license in lieu of a third

class medical certificate may conduct commercial sUAS operations under a Section 333 grant

. 10

Accordingly, Skytec requests an exemption from these provisions to the extent necessary to

9 See, e.g., In the Matter of the Petition of Astraeus Aerial , Grant of Exemption No. 11062 (Sep. 25,

2014), Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0352 (“Exemption No. 11062”) at 8 ( citin g FMRA § 333(b)).

10 See, e.g., In the Matter of the Petition of EnviroMINE, Inc. , Grant of Exemption No. 11227 (Mar.

24, 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0678 at 4, 8; see also FAA, FAA Summary Grants Speed UAS Exemptions (Apr. 9,

2015), https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=82485

.FAA Dockets

A ugust 3

, 2015

Page 4

give Skytec the same relief from medical certificate requirements that FAA has afforded to

hundreds of other operators pursuant to Section 333

. 11

B. 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.101(e)(4) and (5) ; 61.113(a); and 61.315(a)

– P ilot P rivileges

and L imitations

Section 61.113(a) limits private pilots to conducting non

- commercial operations.

Similarly, Sections 61.101(e)(4) and (5) prohibit a recreational pilot from ac ting as pilot in

command of an aircraft for compensation or hire or in furtherance of a business. Section

61.315(a) authorizes a sport pilot certificate holder to act as pilot in com m and of a light

- sport

aircraft, subject to certain restrictions specified in Section 61.315(c), including a prohibition on

doing so for compensation or hire or in furtherance of a business, among other restrictions.

FAA has already determined

, howev er, that a private

, recreational or sport pilot certificate is

sufficient to conduct commercial sUAS flights in a wide variety of operational environment s

. 12

Since Skytec will be conducting its sUAS operations for compensation in further ance of its

business

, Skytec requests an exemption from these provisions to the extent necessary. Skytec

notes that FAA has provide d such relief to hundreds of other Section 333 operators. 13

Consistent with the operating conditions and limitations specified in similar Section 333

g rants, 14 Skytec will utilize only pilots holding a FAA airline transport, commercial, private,

recreational, or sport pilot certificate and at least a valid U.S. driver’s license . The sUAS will be

operated with in VLOS of the pilot

- in

- c ommand (“ PIC ”) at all times , and all operations will utilize

a visual observer ( “ VO ” ) , who will be able to communicate verbally with the PIC at all times

during the operation. And because the area of operation will be controlled and restricted in

accordance with the safeguards contained in the Manual s and the FAA

- approved conditions

and limitations described in Section VI, infra , permitting the sUAS operations as requested

would provide for the level of safety otherwise achieved through these P art 61 provisions

. Accordingly, grant of the requested exemption, subject to the conditions and limitations

specified herein, would not adversely affect the safety of the NAS.

C. 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a)

– Civil aircraft airworthiness

Section 91.7(a) prohibits any person from operating a civil aircraft unless it is in an

airworthy condition. FAA has stated that no exemption is required for 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a) to the

extent that the airworthiness certificate requirements of Part 21 15 are waived or inapplicable.

11 See supra note 3

.

12 Id.

13 Id

.

14 See, e.g

. , Exemption Nos. 11943

, 11946, and 11956

.

15 FAA has concluded that no exemption from Part 21, Subpart H (Airworthiness Certificates) is

needed if the agency makes a finding under the FMRA that the UAS selected provides an equivalent level of safety

when compared to aircraft normally used for the same application. A s t hese criteria are met here, no exemption is

needed. See

, e.g., Exemption No. 11062 at 13

- 14, 22. But to the extent FAA determines that there are some

characteristics of Skytec ’s sUAS that may not meet this standard , an exemption is requested.FAA Dockets

A ugust 3

, 2015

Page 5

Such airworthiness certificate requirements are inapplicable here, i nsofar as Skytec ’ s sUAS

provide for an equivalent level of safety when compared to manned aircraft, consistent with

the relevant language of the FMRA and the precedent FAA has established under Section 333

. 16

D. 14 C.F.R. § 91.119 (c)

– Min imum Safe Altitudes

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Specifically,

Section 91.119(c) provides that except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may

operate an aircraft below an altitude of 500 feet above the surface except over open water or

sparsely populated areas and that in such cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than

500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle or structure. As detailed in previous Section 333 g rants

, however, FAA has determined that adherence to certain safety measures is sufficient to

warrant an exemption from Section 91.119(c) for sUAS operations

. 17 Consistent with the relief

provided to other sUAS operators under Section 333

, Skytec requests an exemption to the

extent necessary to permit Sky tec to operate below an altitude of 500 feet AGL and closer than

500 feet to any person, vessel or structure. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved given

the size, weight and speed of Skytec ’ s sUAS, as well as the location s where it will be operated

( i.e., nowhere near other aircraft)

. In addition, c onsistent with t he flexibility that FAA has

already provided to other Section 333 operators for aerial data collection

, 18 Skytec requests

permission to operate a minimum distance of 200 feet from any non

- participating persons so

long as sufficient barriers exist to protect such persons from debris in the event of an

accident. 19

E. 14 C.F.R. § 91.121

– Alti meter Settings

Section 91.121 requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude

by reference to an altimeter that is set “to the elevation of the departure airport or an

appropriate altimeter setti ng available before departure

. ” Since Skytec ’ s sUAS will not be

equipped with a typical barometric altimeter, Skytec requests rel ief from this provision

consistent with the relief that FAA has already granted to other sUAS operators flying at

similarly low altitudes. 20 Skytec will operate the sUAS within VLOS at or below 400 feet AGL

and provide altitude information to the PIC via a digitally encoded telemetric data feed that

downlinks from the aircraft to a ground

- based on

- screen display. The altitude information will

16 See, e.g., id.

17 See, e.g., supra note 3

.

18 See supra note 4

.

19 See In the Matter of the Petition of Team 5, LLC , Grant of Exemption No. 11158 (Jan. 29, 2015),

Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0783, at 16

- 17; In the Matter of the Petition of Picture Factory, Inc. , Grant of Exemption No.

11178 (Feb. 18, 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0794, at 23; In the Matter of the Petition of Shotover Camera Systems,

L.P. , Grant of Exemption No. 11159 (Jan. 30, 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0784, at 12; see also FAA Order 8900.1,

Vol. 3, Ch. 8, Sec. 1 (allowing certain relief from 14 C.F.R. § 119(c) in the filming context, including the 200 ft.

minimum distance standard requested herein).

20 See supra note 3.FAA Dockets

A ugust 3

, 2015

Page 6

be generated by equipment installed on the sUAS, and prior to each flight a zero altitude

initiation point will be established and confirmed for accuracy by the PIC.

F. 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a)

– Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

Section 91.151(a) prohibits an individual from beginning “a flight in an airplane under

VFR conditions unless (considering wind a nd forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel

to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed

– (1) During

the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45

minu tes.” But provided certain operational parameters are established, FAA has found that

good cause exists for granting exemptions from this provision for operations in a multitude of

contexts

. 21

Skytec will be operating a less than 55

- pound sUAS in tightly

- controlled en vironment s at

speeds below 87 knots and within VLOS. Combined with the fact that Skytec will not conduct

operations unless its sUAS has enough available power for the intended mission

, and will not

continue unless there is at least fi ve minutes of power remaining

, relief from Section 91.151(a)

is warranted

, in accordance with the conditions and limitations specified in Section VI, infra

.

G. 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(1) and (2); and 91.417(a) and

(b): Maintenance Inspections

These provisions require that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft

inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall b etween required inspections, except

as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43

of this chapter.

. .,” and that other persons shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance

with Part 43. Under S ection 333

, however, FAA has established safety measures for certain

sUAS operations sufficient to warrant an exemption from these provisions. 22

Skytec will strictly adhere to the maintenance

- and inspection

- related requirements set

forth in its Manual s

, w hich are consistent with applicable conditions and limitations described

in Section VI, infra

.

IV. Unmanned Aircraft System

Skytec proposes to fly DJI Phantom 2 + Vision, DJI Phantom 3 Professional, DJI Inspire 1

,

and Aeryon SkyRanger sUAS. These sUAS are battery

- powered multi

- rotors weighing less than

55 pounds that will be flown in acc ordance with strict operating safeguards as more fully

described in Section VI, infra

, as well as those described in the Manual s

. T he sUAS will operate

at a speed of no more than 87 knots and have the capability to hover, and move in the vertical

and horizontal plane simultaneously.

21 Id.

22 Id

.FAA Dockets

A ugust 3

, 2015

Page 7

The system safety features of Skytec ’ s sUAS include geofencing, a full suite of

contingency manageme nt functions, user and flight plan management and approval

functionality, and many more

. These and other features will ensure the safety of persons and

property within and surrounding the limited operating area. In the event the sUAS lose s

communications or its GPS signal, it will have the capability to return to a pre

- determined

location and land. The sUAS will also have the capability to abort a flight in the event of

unpredicted obstacles or emergencies. A comprehensive description of Skytec ’ s sUAS and their

specifications and capabilities is contained in the Manual s

.

As FAA has recognized, the limited weight of less than 55

- pound sUAS significantly

reduces the potential for harm to participating and nonparticipating individuals or property in

the event of an accident or incident, and the risk to an onboard pilot and crew is eliminated

with the use of sUAS. 23

In addition, prior to each flight, the PIC will conduct a pre

- flight inspection of the sUAS,

and maintenance will be performed to addres s any condition potentially affecting safe

operations. All maintenance and alterations will be documented in the aircraft records. The

safety guidelines specified in the Manuals address the following key areas : ( 1 ) individual parts

( e.g., remote controller, compass, parameter settings, battery, storage and transportation,

maintenance and upkeep, etc.); (2) flight environment requirements ; ( 3 ) flight warnings ( e.g.,

failsafe and return to home, low battery, vision positioning system, transf ormation function,

etc.) ; (4 ) pre

- flight checklist ; and (5 ) maintenance checks concerning the battery,

transformation sy stem, motors

, and vision positioning system.

V. Unmanned Aircraft PIC

As described above

, the PIC will be a FAA licensed airman with either an airline

transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate, that holds a current FAA

airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license

. The PIC will also meet the flight

review requirements specified in Section 61 .56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or

her pilot certificate. And, p rior to conducting commercial operations under this exemption, t he

PIC will have accumulated and logged sufficient UAS

- specific flight experience

, including at least

12 ho urs on its sUAS before being designated to operate it commercially.

In addition, the PIC and the VO will have successfully com pleted a qualification process

and a sUAS flight demonstration administered by a Skytec

- approved and

- qualified pilot.

23 Id.FAA Dockets

A ugust 3

, 2015

Page 8

VI. Operation of the Unmanned Aircraft

Skytec will conduct all flights under the requested exemption subject to the following

conditions and limitations, and as further detailed in the Manual s : 24

A. The sUAS will weigh less than 55 pounds (25 kilograms ), including payload

.

B. The s UA S will not be flown at a ground speed exceeding 87 knots ( i.e. 100 miles per

hour)

.

C. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet AGL. All altitudes

reported to ATC will be in feet AGL

.

D. The s UA S will be operated within VLOS of the PIC and/or VO at all times.

E. All operations will utilize a VO , who may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long

as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The VO and PIC will be able to

communicate verbally at al l times.

F. The grant of exemption and Manual s will be accessible during Skytec ’ s sUAS operations

and made available to FAA upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions

and limitations in the grant of exemption and the procedures outlined in the Manual s

,

the conditions and limitations in the exemption take precedence and will be followed.

G. Prior to each operation, the PIC will inspect the s UAS to ensure it is in a condition for

safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the

s UAS, it will not be operated until the necessary maintenance has been performed and

the s UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The ground control station will also

be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations will be

documented in the sUAS records.

H. Any s UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect its operation or

flight characteristics ( e.g

. , replacement of a flight critical component ) will undergo a

functional tes t flight prior to resumption of operations

. The PIC who conducts the

functional test flight will make an entry in the s UAS aircraft records of the flight.

I. Skytec will follow the manufacturer’s s UAS aircraft/component, maintenance, overhaul,

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements.

24 The conditions and limitations detailed in this section are consistent with those set forth in the

previous FAA Section 333 grants for operations similar to those Skytec seeks to conduct through this petition

. See,

e.g

., supra note 4

.FAA Dockets

A ugust 3

, 2015

Page 9

J. The PIC will possess either an airline transport, commercial, private, recreational, or

sport pilot certificate, and a current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S.

driver’s licens e. The PIC will undergo at least 12 hours of training to ensure that he or

she can follow these procedures. The PIC will also meet the flight review requirements

specified in Section 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot

certificate.

K. Prior to conducting commercial operations under this exemption:

1. T he PIC will have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with Section

61.51(b)

, a minimum of : 12 hours of flying Skytec ’s sUAS or 24 flights accrued

bef ore being design ated to operate it for commercial aerial data collection

. During training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, the PIC will operate

the s UA S with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with

Section 91.119.

2. A flight demonstration, administered by a Skytec

- approved and

- qualified pilot

, will be successfully completed and documented. This documentation will be

available for review upon request by FAA

.

L. The s UA S will be operated at least 500 feet from all nonp articipating persons, vessels,

vehicles, or structures unless both of the following conditions are met :

1. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating

persons in the event of an accident; and

2. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted

permission for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety

assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that

it does not present an undue hazard.

M. If the s UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it will return to a

predetermined location within the security perimeter and land or be recovered in

accordance with the Manual s

.

N. The s UAS will abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or eme rgencies in

accordance with the Manual s

.

O. The sUAS will not be operated unless it has enough available power to conduct the

intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes, or with the

reserve power recommended by the manufacturer, w hichever is greater.FAA Dockets

A ugust 3

, 2015

Page 10

P. Skytec will obtain an Air Traffic Organization ( “ ATO ” ) issued Certificate of Waiver or

Authorization ( “ COA ” ) prior to conducting any operations above 200 f ee t AGL under the

exemption. 25

Q. All sUAS operated in accordance with this exemption will be identified by serial number,

registered in accordance with 14 C

. F

. R

. P art 47, and have identification (N

- Number)

markings in accordance with 14 C

. F

. R

. P art 45, Subpart C. Markings will be as large as

pra cticable.

R. Skytec will follow the procedures established in the Manuals for documenting and

maintaining records of the s UAS maintenance, preventative maintenance, alterations,

status of replacement/overhaul component parts, and the total time in service of the

s UAS

.

S. Each s UAS operated under this exemption will comply with all manufacturer Safety

Bulletins.

T. The preflight inspection section described in the Manual s will account for all

discrepancies ( i.e

. , inoperable components, items, or equipment )

.

U. Skytec ’ s use of radio frequency spectrum for operation and control of the s UA S will

comply with the Federal Communications Commission ( “ FCC ” ) or other appropriate

government oversight agency requirements.

V. The documents required under Sections 91.9 and 91.203 will be available to the PIC at

the ground control station of the s UAS any time the aircraft are operating. These

documents will be made available to FAA or any law enforcement official upon request.

W. The s UA S will remain clear and yield the right of way to all other manned operations and

activities at all times (including, but not limited to, ultralight vehicles, parachute

activities, parasailing activities, hang gliders, etc.).

X. s UAS operations will n ot be conducted during night, as defined in Section 1.1. All

operations will be conducted under visual meteorological conditions ( “ VMC ” ). Flights

under special visual flight rules ( “ SVFR ” ) are not authorized.

25 Pursuant to its “blanket” COA, FAA will automatically grant a COA for flights at or below 200 feet

to any UAS operator with a Section 333 exemption for aircraft that weigh less than 55 pounds, operate during

daytime VFR conditions, operate within VLOS, and stay certain prescribed distances away from airports or

heliports. See FAA, FAA Streamlines UAS COAs for Section 333 (rev. Mar. 24, 2015),

https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=82245 . Thi s blanket COA allows flights anywhere in the country

except restricted airspace and certain other prohibited areas

, and FAA automatically issues it at the time the

exemption is approved. Id

. T o the extent Skytec plans to operate its sUAS above 200 ft. AG L, it will apply for a

COA authorizing it to do so.FAA Dockets

A ugust 3

, 2015

Page 11

Y. The s UAS will not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

Z. The s UA S will not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than three statute miles from the PIC.

AA. The s UA S will not be operate d within five nautical miles of an airport reference point

( “ ARP ” ) as denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory ( “ AFD ” ) or for airports

not denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current

FAA

- published aeronautical chart

, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to Skytec

. The letter

of agreement with the airport management will be made available to FAA and any law

enforcement official upon request.

BB. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA will be reported to

FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) within 24 hours and the National Transportation

Safety Board ( “ NTSB ” ) , as applicable

.

VII. Public Interest

Authorizing Skytec to use sUAS for aerial data collection under the conditions specified

herein w ill bring immediate and significant safety improvement in various commercial

industries and for Skytec ’s m yriad customers. In particular :

 Skytec sUAS data collection will increase the efficiency of surveying and quantifying

spatial landform and infrastructure characteristics in challenging terrain, such as

landfills, tailing ponds, utility right

- of

- ways, dense forests, or wetlands; where

traditional survey methods place individuals unde r much greater safety risks.

 Costs for operating Skytec’s sUAS fleet are significantly lower than manned aerial survey

missions. These cost savings will accrue to Skytec’s clients during geospatial data

collection projects

.

Skytec ’s sUAS w ill be used for aerial data collection in a manner that provides at least an

equivalent level of safety compared to the current regulatory structure that applies to manned

aircraft

. 26 They will also provide for safer and more efficient means of performing certain

comm ercial tasks that are currently performed by other methods.

26 See Exemption No. 11062 at 22.FAA Dockets

A ugust 3

, 2015

Page 12

Crowell & Moring LLP  www.crowell.com  Washington, DC  New York  San Francisco  Los Ang eles  Orang e County  Anchorag e  London  Brussels

VIII. Conclusion

Given the small size of Skytec ’s sUAS and the restricted , controlled environment within

which they will operate, Skytec ’s proposed sUAS operations fall squarely within the type of

operations that Congress intended be authorized pursuant to Section 333

. They are also similar

in all material respects to those that FAA has already authorized under Section 333, including

several covering nearly identical types of operations

– and should be approved on an expedited

basis. Based on the clear direction from Congress

, the authority contained in the Federal

Aviation Act, as amended; the well

- established equivalent level of safety present in Skytec ’s

proposed operations ; the sign ificant public benefit s associated with using s UAS for aerial data

collection ; and the precedent that FAA has established through more than 900 Section 333

grants

, grant of Skytec ’s petition is in the public interest. Accordingly, Skytec respectfully

requests that FAA grant it an exemption without delay

.

Respectfully submitted,

Gerald F. Murphy

Counsel for Skytec LLC