alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**








**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**


**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A  of
  Toro Ventures Inc. (the "Registrant") for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
  2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
  I, Yan Liu, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
  Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our
  knowledge and belief:





(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
  Registrant.





Date: June 18, 2007
      By:
      /s/ Yan LiuYan LiuChief Executive Officer, President  and Principal Financial Officer





A
  signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
  document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
  that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
  statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will
  be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0555 Directorate ID: 2010-SW-047-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model EC135 and MBB-BK 117 C-2 

Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 175 Model EC135 and 112 Model MBB-BK 117 C-2 

Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent the affected flight control lever from 

shifting, contacting the helicopter structure, and reducing control of the helicopter. 

Costs:

 For EC135 helicopters, it would take about 32 work-hours to perform the modification. Parts 

would cost about $312. The total cost for the modification would be about $3,032 per helicopter and 

$530,600 for the U.S. operator fleet. The repetitive inspections would require 6.5 work-hours for a cost 

of about $553 per helicopter and about $96,775 for the fleet per inspection cycle.

 For MBB-BK 117 C-2 helicopters, it would take about 32 work-hours to perform the 

modification. Parts would cost about $396. The total cost for the modification would be $3,116 per 

helicopter and $348,992 for the U.S. operator fleet. The cost for the repetitive inspections thereafter 

would be about $85 per helicopter and $9,520 for the fleet per inspection cycle.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Matt Fuller
EXHIBIT 32.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


I, Ellen J. Talles,  President,  Secretary and  Treasurer of Quetzal  Capital I,
Inc. (the "Corporation"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:

1.    the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the  Corporation for the quarterly
period  ended  September  30,  2005  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2.    the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Date:  November 14, 2005

By: Ellen J. Talles
   ----------------------------------------------------
    Ellen J. Talles, President, Secretary and Treasurer


                                       14
Exhibit 24.1



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Lionel Reilly, or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my
name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2003, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with
respect to the registration of the common stock of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd., and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this
24th day of October, 2003.



/s/    Buddy D. RayBuddy D. Ray




|STATE OF
KENTUCKY |  | )           
|----------------- |  | ------------
|                  |  | )        ss.
|COUNTY OF
GRAVES  |  | )           



On this 24th
day of October, 2003, before me, a Notary Public qualified for said County, personally came Buddy D. Ray, known to me to be the identical person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the execution thereof to be his voluntary act and
deed.



/s/    Pam ShelbyNotary PublicMy commission expires:1-26-05
|   | (1) |   | The Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for                    the period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-QSB”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of                    the                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |   |
|--------|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   | (2) |   | The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,                    in all                    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |   |
|--------|-----|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|                           |                                                                 |                       |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                           | **VALLEY FORGE COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**(Registrant)            |
|                           |                                                                 |                       |
| Dated: May 15, 2007  | By:                                                        | /s/ Louis J. Brothers |
|                           | Louis J. Brothers                                                    |
|                           | President, Secretary and Treasurer(Principal Executive Officer) |

----
#### Sadie V. Morales, Respondent, v Jolee Consolidators, Inc., Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.), entered May 29, 1990, which, upon a jury verdict, found in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $493,764.90, including interest and costs, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff established a *prima facie*case of negligence against defendant, the owner of a warehouse/garage where plaintiff slipped and fell on a 2 to 3 foot wide grease spot. The testimony showed that grease spots appeared regularly in the warehouse, where various delivery trucks were garaged requiring the regular use of "Speedy Dry”, an absorbent, and that the area had not been cleaned in six hours. Plaintiff, a salesperson, appeared at the premises to pick up a shipment *316of products. On this evidence, the jury could rationally infer that defendant had actual knowledge of a recurring and hazardous condition. Under these circumstances, defendant was charged with constructive notice of each specific reoccurrence of that condition. *(Weisenthal v Pickman,*153 AD2d 849.) The jury’s determination that plaintiff was not negligent despite her failure to see the grease spot, was not against the weight of the evidence. *(Nallan v Helmsley-Spear, Inc.,*50 NY2d 507.)

The verdict for conscious pain and suffering did not deviate materially from reasonable compensation, in view of testimony that plaintiff lacerated her forehead and fractured her left wrist, which resulted in substantial pain and permanent deformity and impairment of physical activity. *(Christopher v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co.,*161 AD2d 274, *rearg denied*166 AD2d 334, *lv denied*76 NY2d 1003.) Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P. (the
“Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Daniel C. Sibley, principal financial officer of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





Date:  August
      13, 2010
              /s/
      Daniel C. SibleyDaniel
      C. SibleyChief
      Financial Officer and General Counsel ofReef
      Exploration, L.P.(principal
      financial and accounting
officer)





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of § 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Partnership and will
be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 27, 2013

No. 04-13-00083-CV

HALE LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY, INC.,

Appellant

v.

SILVARIS CORPORATION, d/b/a Low Grande Lumber and 

SILVARIS CORPORATION, d/b/a Low Grade Lumber and Alcalosa Forwarding, Inc.,

Appellees

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 08-12-24038-MCV

Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz, Judge Presiding

No. 04-13-00320-CV

IN RE HALE LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY, INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The panel has considered the Motion for Rehearing filed by Hale Land and Cattle 

Company, Inc. and the motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on August 27, 2013.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 08-12-24038-MCV, styled Silvaris Corporation, D/B/A Low 

Grade Lumber and Alcalosa Forwarding, Inc. v. Hale Land and Cattle Company, Inc., pending in the 293rd Judicial 

District Court, Maverick County, Texas, the Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz presiding.

 
_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of August, 2013.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,**

**18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, Louis J. Brothers, Chief Executive Officer of Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. (the “Corporation”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:

1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Date: November 15, 2010

By:  /Louis J. Brothers/ 

        Louis J. Brothers

President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief 

Financial Officer, and   Chairman of the 

Board

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The information contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section.
1

Sutton, Tia

From: Hengst, Benjamin

Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 12:16 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad

Cc: Sutton, Tia

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Comments on EPA Aircraft Endangerment Finding NOPR/GHG Standards 

ANPR (2060-AS31)

Attachments: Aircraft GHG Preamble_ANPR Response to IA 5-14-15.docx; 

CAEPSG.20112.WP.025.3.en_US_CO2 Standard.pdf; ICAO Convention on Int Civil 

Aviation_9th Edition_7300_9ed.pdf; ICF_CO2 Analysis of CO2-Reducing Technologies for 

Aircraft_March 17 2015.docx

Hi Chad, 

I’m attaching the next iteration of the aircraft package. A few notes: 

• This version responds to the 5/8 comments, and incorporates the new Section G edits as well. 

• We are attaching three supporting documents that you requested. 

• In addition to responding to specific interagency comments in this 2nd round, we have updated sections I, II, and 

V (most updates are in section V) with 2013 GHG inventory numbers, which are from the 2015 EPA GHG & Sinks 

report just published on April 15, 2015. Note, in the first round of OMB review, OMB asked, “has EPA released 

the inventory for 2013 and 2014 yet – if so, consider including in this discussion.” We responded that since the 

2013 inventory numbers were just released, we need time to update the inventory numbers throughout the

preamble (particularly section V), and OMB was okay with this response. Subsequently, we have now finished 

updating these inventory numbers. 

Please let me know if you have questions. 

Thanks, 

Ben 

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 5:29 PM 

To: Sutton, Tia 

Cc: Hengst, Benjamin 

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Comments on EPA Aircraft Endangerment Finding NOPR/GHG Standards ANPR (2060-AS31) 

Tia, 

 Attached are the suggested EO 12866 interagency comments pertaining to just Section G of the draft rule. The 

attached document does not contain the comments that I sent over on 5/8 in the email below. When EPA responds, 

please use the document from 5/8 and substitute Section G from the document attached to this email. The suggested 

changes in Section G can be identified by green highlighted text in the body of the email. 

 Please let me know if you have any questions. 

Thanks, 

Chad 
2

From: Whiteman, Chad 

Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 12:18 AM 

To: 'Sutton, Tia' 

Cc: Hengst, Benjamin 

Subject: EO 12866 Comments on EPA Aircraft Endangerment Finding NOPR/GHG Standards ANPR (2060-AS31) 

Tia, 

 Attached are additional comments on the aircraft emissions rule and endangerment finding. We’re still working 

through language Section G and how to have something early next week. In the meantime, would you please respond 

to the attached comments. The new comments can be identified by searching for EO12866 in the comment bubbles. 

Thanks, 

Chad
# L_2006134EN.01005401.xml

| 20.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 134/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 134/54

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 746/2006 of 17 May 2006 on import licences in respect of beef and veal products originating in Botswana, Kenya, Madagascar, Swaziland, Zimbabwe and Namibia

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 130 of 18 May 2006
  )

On page 23, in Article 2:

for:

‘... of May 2006...’,

read:

‘... of June 2006 ...’.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alvin Remouns, Also Known as Darren Remouns, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Cohen, J.), rendered March 16, 1989, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to three to six years imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s conviction arises out of an attempted robbery on a Bronx street during the early morning hours of December 10, 1987.

We reject defendant’s argument that the People failed to *410prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Evidence adduced at trial was that the complainant was approached from behind by defendant and another man, each of whom held a knife to the complainant’s stomach and demanded that he give up everything he had. Fortuitously for the complainant, a police car containing two officers happened to be cruising in the immediate area. The complainant beckoned to the officers and the would-be robbers pocketed their knives as the officers approached. While defendant attempted to convince the officers that they were "just joking”, the complainant told the officers that the two men were trying to rob him.

Although the complainant admitted in court that he could not positively identify defendant as one of the would-be robbers, both officers testified that defendant was one of the two men they observed flanking the complainant; that the complainant beckoned to the officers and told them that the two men were trying to rob him; that a knife was recovered from each of the two men; and that defendant was one of the two men arrested.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, and drawing permissible inferences, it is clear that a rational trier of fact could find that defendant’s guilt of attempted robbery in the second degree was proven beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, e.g., People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620).

Issues of credibility are primarily for the jury to decide. There is no basis here for this Court to disturb the jury’s finding, where the People’s witnesses, including the complainant (an admitted drug user) testified in detail regarding the incident, and were subject to extensive cross-examination which revealed no significant inconsistencies in their testimony *(see, e.g., People v Gruttola,*43 NY2d 116). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.
7/21/2015 Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­1906

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABFvqQJAFf5SI8crGhIsEIyBwD3qfMUO7BCQ74YBi9P12... 1/1

Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­1906

9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions (FAA)

Sent:Tuesday, July 21, 2015 2:50 PM

To: eric.alexander.harris@gmail.com

Dear Mr. Harris:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA−2015−1906).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

Describe the aircraft makes, models, and types (i.e., fixed‐wing, rotorcraft, lighter‐than‐air) for the proposed

UAS operation. The descriptions should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information

can be located in the aircraft manuals.

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want

us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 8/4/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267­4264.

Regards,

Dan Ngo

FAA Office of Rulemaking
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      22,706,767
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,120,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                   384,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,693,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,618,363
<PP&E>                                      51,255,838
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,470,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             461,616,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       45,967,683
<BONDS>                                     82,378,122
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,000,000
<COMMON>                                         1,700
<OTHER-SE>                                 262,166,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               461,616,949
<SALES>                                    141,990,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           141,990,480
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              169,884,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (24,924,324)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          15,980,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (18,950,460)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,495,416
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (23,445,876)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (23,445,876)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (137.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (137.92)
        



</TABLE>