alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee was established by Public Law 98-181, November 30, 1983, to advise the Export-Import Bank on its programs and to provide comments for inclusion in the reports of the Export-Import Bank of the United States to Congress.

*Time and Place:*                         Tuesday, March 20, 2012 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. A break for lunch will be at the expense of the attendee. Security processing will be necessary for reentry into the building. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in the Main Conference Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20571.                    

*Agenda:*                         Agenda items include a briefing of the Advisory Committee members regarding the progress of the Bank's First Quarter, its legislative status and the competitiveness report process.                    

*Public Participation:*                         The meeting will be open to public participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) before or after the meeting. If you plan to attend, a photo ID must be presented at the guard's desk as part of the clearance process into the building, and you may contact Susan Houser to be placed on an attendee list. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please contact, prior to March 15, 2011, Susan Houser, Room 1273, 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202) 565-3232.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, contact Houser, Room 1273, 811 Vermont Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3232.

Angela Mariana Freyre,

Senior Vice President and General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2012-5966 Filed 3-12-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerome Frazier, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), rendered June 30, 1989, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*845We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Brown, Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
                                

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                AMERICAN COIN MERCHANDISING, INC.
                                                COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED                 YEAR ENDED
                                                      DECEMBER 31,                   DECEMBER 31,
                                                 1997            1996           1997           1996
                                                 ----            ----           ----           ----
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
<S>                                          <C>             <C>            <C>             <C>
Net Earnings                                 $ 1,658,000     $ 1,134,000    $ 4,429,000     $ 2,586,000
                                             -----------    ------------   ------------    ------------
Common Shares Outstanding
    At Beginning of Period                     5,450,904       5,081,608      5,123,274       5,081,608

Effect of Shares Issued  During
    The Period                                   707,228          41,666        441,993          10,474
                                             -----------    ------------   ------------    ------------
Shares Used In Computing Basic
    Earnings Per Share                         6,158,132       5,123,274      5,565,267       5,092,082

Effect of Shares Issuable Under
    Stock Options Using The
    Treasury Stock Method                        230,100         325,523        128,822         325,368
                                             -----------    ------------   ------------    ------------
Shares Used In Computing Diluted
    Earnings Per Share                         6,388,232       5,448,797      5,694,089       5,417,450
                                             ===========    ============   ============    ============
Basic Earnings Per Common Share              $    0.27      $     0.22     $      0.80     $     0.51
                                                  ====            ====            ====           ====
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share                 0.26            0.21            0.78           0.48
                                                  ====            ====            ====           ====                            
</TABLE>

----------------

Basic and diluted net earnings per share for the three months and year ended
December 31, 1995 has been omitted because through August 31, 1995 the
Combined Companies were not a single entity with one capital structure.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2044 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2044

To provide for the reliquidation of certain entries relating to orange 
                           juice from Brazil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the reliquidation of certain entries relating to orange 
                           juice from Brazil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE ENTRIES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding sections 514 and 520 of the Tariff 
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520), or any other provisions of law, 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall, not later than 90 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, liquidate or reliquidate the 
entries listed in subsection (c) in accordance with the final results 
of the administrative reviews undertaken by the International Trade 
Administration of the Department of Commerce with respect to the 
antidumping duty order on certain orange juice from Brazil (Case Number 
A-351-840) and covering the periods from August 24, 2005, through 
February 28, 2007, and from March 1, 2007, through February 29, 2008, 
respectively.
    (b) Payment of Amounts Owed.--Any amounts owed by the United States 
pursuant to the liquidation or reliquidation of an entry under 
subsection (a) shall be paid by U.S. Customs and Border Protection not 
later than 90 days after such liquidation or reliquidation with 
interest.
    (c) Affected Entries.--The entries referred to in subsection (a) 
are the following:

 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Entry Number                                                             Date of Entry
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  032-0354213-3                                                          12/14/2006
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  032-0358707-0                                                          04/05/2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  032-0362302-4                                                          07/09/2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                 <all>
```
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Akira Technologies, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62304

)

Under Contract Nos. GS

- 35F

- 515BA

T .O. HC1028

- 19

- F

- 0138 )

)

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : C. Peter Dungan

, Esq.

Roger V

. Abbott, Esq.

Miles & Stockbridge P.C.

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: William E. Brazis

, Jr., Esq.

DISA General Counsel

Joseph A. Buitron, Esq.

Deputy General Counsel

Michelle L. Sabin, Esq.

Vera A. Strebel, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

Defense Information Systems Agency

Scott Air Force Base, IL

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: May 25 , 2021

DANIEL S. HERZFELD

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals2 I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62304

, Appeal of Akira

Technologies, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: May 26, 2021

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference into Registration Statement Nos.
333-76223, 333-83521, 333-57972, 333-74100, 333-89134, 333-114234, and
333-123135 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-08990, 333-30304, 333-57970, 333-70238,
333-107835, 333-114243, and 333-115596 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 15,
2006, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cray Inc. and subsidiaries
for the year ended December 31, 2005.


/s/ PETERSON SULLIVAN PLLC


Seattle, Washington
April 20, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Russo, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.), rendered August 23, 1988, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*578The pertinent facts on this appeal have been recounted in the decision and order determining the appeal by the codefendant *(see, People v Russo,*173 AD2d 576 [decided herewith]).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that, contrary to the defendant’s contention, it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant also contends that his alibi witnesses were all credible and that the jury failed to properly consider their testimony. However, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of St. Christopher-Ottilie, for the Guardianship of Christine T. and Another, Children Alleged to be Neglected, Respondent. Marie T., Appellant.

Orders of Disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered November 21, 1989, which terminated the parental rights of respondent-appellant over her children Christine and Patrick, and committed custody and guardianship to petitioner-respondent and to the Commissioner of Social Services, following a fact-finding determination that respondent had permanently neglected her children by failing to plan for their future despite petitioner’s diligent efforts to reunite the family, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The credible evidence at the fact-finding hearing demonstrates that respondent permanently neglected her children despite petitioner’s diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; *Matter of Jamie M.,*63 NY2d 388, 390). While petitioner provided or arranged for therapy, parenting skills training and housing, respondent remained uncooperative and did not seriously address her problems. An agency "is not charged with a guarantee that the parent succeed in overcoming his or her predicaments. Indeed, an agency that has *289embarked on a diligent course but faces an utterly uncooperative or indifferent parent should nevertheless be deemed to have fulfilled its duty” *(Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368, 385).

The court properly determined that the best interest of the children required termination of parental rights to allow adoption by the foster parents *(Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin, Ross and Asch, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1878 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1878

   To extend and amend the temporary duty suspension on certain thin 
                           fiberglass sheets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend and amend the temporary duty suspension on certain thin 
                           fiberglass sheets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FIBERGLASS SHEETS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.70.19 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended--
            (1) by striking ``approximately .0125 inches thick'' and 
        inserting ``that are approximately 0.40 millimeters to 1.65 
        millimeters thick''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Charles De Cook, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered March 1, 1990, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The complaint, which was served in or around December, 1987, structured in the form of a class action, alleges that the *306Department of Sanitation’s sick leave policy deprives the purported class of plaintiffs of their liberty, right to travel, freedom to attend religious services, their freedom of association and their right to counsel as guaranteed under the United States Constitution, without due process of law. Inasmuch as plaintiff failed to either seek or obtain class certification, however, the complaint must be viewed solely with respect to the injury sustained or threatened to be sustained by plaintiff. In that regard, we agree with the IAS part that the papers submitted in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment failed to demonstrate a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, we need not reach the constitutional issues raised by plaintiff on this appeal, including the challenge raised with respect to plaintiff’s right to the free exercise of religion as guaranteed under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, inasmuch as plaintiff has not shown in other than the most conclusory terms that he suffered any deprivation of such rights with respect to the regulations as applied to him. In so doing, however, we do not preclude ourselves from revisiting the issues in the appropriate context, and upon a more substantial record. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
# L_2006061EN.01000901.xml

| 2.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 61/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 61/9

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 363/2006

of 1 March 2006

on the issue of system B export licences in the fruit and vegetables sector (tomatoes)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1961/2001 of 8 October 2001 on detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards export refunds on fruit and vegetables (2), and in particular Article 6(6) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 2044/2005 (3) fixes the indicative quantities for which system B export licences may be issued. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2044/2005 (3) fixes the indicative quantities for which system B export licences may be issued.

| (2) | In the light of the information available to the Commission today, there is a risk that the indicative quantities laid down for the current export period for tomatoes will shortly be exceeded. This overrun will prejudice the proper working of the export refund scheme in the fruit and vegetables sector. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In the light of the information available to the Commission today, there is a risk that the indicative quantities laid down for the current export period for tomatoes will shortly be exceeded. This overrun will prejudice the proper working of the export refund scheme in the fruit and vegetables sector.

| (3) | To avoid this situation, applications for system B licences for tomatoes after 2 March 2006 should be rejected until the end of the current export period, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

To avoid this situation, applications for system B licences for tomatoes after 2 March 2006 should be rejected until the end of the current export period,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for system B export licences for tomatoes submitted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 2044/2005, export declarations for which are accepted after 2 and before 17 March 2006, are hereby rejected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 2 March 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 March 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 268, 9.10.2001, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 328, 15.12.2005, p. 54.

3

---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1983 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain used compressionignition internal combustion piston engines used in remanufacture. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. WICKER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain used 

compression-ignition internal combustion piston engines 

used in remanufacture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN USED COMPRESSION-IGNITION IN4 TERNAL COMBUSTION PISTON ENGINES 

5 USED IN REMANUFACTURE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.31 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 certain used compression-ignition internal combustion pis9 ton engines used in remanufacture) is amended by striking 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1983 IS

1 the date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/ 

2 31/2011’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS