alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Rahim Rayani, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Force Energy Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 21, 2008

*/s/ Rahim Rayani*Rahim RayaniChief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
# L_2006047EN.01004501.xml

| 17.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/45

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 285/2006

of 16 February 2006

providing for the rejection of applications for export licences in the cereal sector in relation to products of CN code 1101 00 15

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1342/2003 of 27 July 2003 laying down special detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences for cereals and rice (2), and in particular Article 8(1) thereof,

Whereas:

The quantity covered by applications for advance fixing of refunds on CN code 1101 00 15 products is of great importance and could give rise to speculation. It has therefore been decided to reject all applications for export licences of such products made on 14, 15 and 16 February 2006,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In accordance with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1342/2003, applications for export licences with advance fixing of refunds for products falling within CN code 1101 00 15 made on 14, 15 and 16 February 2006 shall be rejected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 February 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 February 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 189, 29.7.2003, p. 12. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1092/2004 (OJ L 209, 11.6.2004, p. 9).

2

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ion Marton, Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 11, 1990, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

At the hearing, testimony was taken from claimant’s employer who stated that she received two complaints of inappro*1046priate behavior toward two women by claimant. Both of the women, involved also testified that claimant had inappropriately touched them. Although claimant denied any involvement, this merely presented a question of credibility which was within the exclusive province of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to resolve *(see, Matter of Padilla [Sephardic Home for the Aged—Roberts],*113 AD2d 997). Here, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s decision disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits due to misconduct *(see, Matter of Valentin [American Museum of Natural History—Roberts]*103 AD2d 919).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Weiss, J. P., Yesawich, Jr., Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000949244
<NAME> ALTERNATE POSTAL DELIVERY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,058
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                       104
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,616
<PP&E>                                             974
<DEPRECIATION>                                     780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,196
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,386
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,469)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,118
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,442
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,710
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  21
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     54
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 50
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     38
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        88
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

Ban. Temseay County Attorney Petter c4mlty &arKllo, Texas AUSTIN / /” Syie 14, 1999 I ,’Hon. Ttiw f3aay. June 14, 1QSQ. Ps8a 8

lottsm,he shallbefiinednotl~a tbantuu nor aom than riity dollar&*
we quoterraa mxas Jurlaprudenoe, Vol. ae, page 4oQ as ~follow%:

-The tam 'lottemy h&s r&o tso~l **slgeifleation** fn the law, **and** ~afnoe our statute does not proridea dstinftion, **its** IIIMU~ **lrust** ba d8terraimad fl‘08 popdtu
~~~ Aocordlngto that teat, a lotfem is ~asohems for the distribution of prfzus by lot or~ohrumeamong thosewho bave'pald or agreed to pay a ooneideratlon ror the right to psrtioipatetherein,or the distribution itseW.a The oourt in'the ease OS Teath%r@olled va+ IndC pandent SerTioe 8tatlozl Asao%iation.10 SW 2nd 121 defined a lottery as follaws:

The Fsd%ral CirouitCourt oi Appeals inths OBBcbot Peek vs. UnIted qatba. 61 F. 2nd 973, has &rS& a lottery the followingdefinition%

*A SMJ~WIIO

far th0 ai%tribt&tOlon Of prizcbe

or thinga or value br lot or ahems, moagpersonswhehaospaldoragMnrdte ,, pay a ztaluabla Oon6iaerati0n tOrthe #alulge to obtain a rim. **A** sohrrsa by whiuh a W cult Is mo fi

ed by scme aation ar mans taken, in whteh resnltsman*8 aboioo or will hae PO part, nor een hmmn ms~z+..r.rr~ aagaoityor deeign enable hN to kna OrHon. Tom Seay', Suae 14, lQS9,Page 5

deterwiae....uatil the %am ha6 bsea soooraplished," The followinghare bsea held to be lottsriesr Fuaoh boardat slot or rendiag nmehhiae; the sale.ofboxes of **oaady,** whioh aoataia prizes; emit OlUb6, that is, qlubs formd by tallors'forthe distr&butIoon of olathes by ahaaas;and variousgrimes in meohaaioal nature. In the ease, City of Wink vs. Grimth Amusement Company, 100 SW Zad 685, it was +bld that the aeoessary elementsof a lotteryarea

*Offering



### or a prize, award 

### or prize by ohpaoe,and giving 69 aonsldemtion far opportuaityto uin~i)cize.* In the aase of'GriffIth J=s==tc=paayg WI, xorgan, 98 8W &d 844, It was ,h&.ld that the alemeats essentialto ooastitttea lottoryare e prize ia maasy or thIq of talus, dIslqibutIoa by ohease **and** payaw& eithsr dixeotlyor indirsetly, of a valuablsooasideratIoa for the ohawe to win the prize.

In the oases ot State ~a. Rnadls 41 Tsx. Eob and Eohma~~ ~8, State 47 8W 850 it was heid that any aci~a for&? dl%trlinatioa of prisms by ehawe Is a lottery. fn View Or the tO~.&.S~ authorities, pOu srs I%i3pMtlVelj

adViSt3d that it 18 th8 OpmOn Or this **dC** partmeatthat the operationof the above describedis&em 

### 18 a riolatfoa

### 0r the lotterylmva or this state.

we remain Trusting that the roregoin(l aaawe~~your inquiry, Varytrulyyotxre ATl'Ow(w GEHERAL OF ‘L ’BXM ma drdtsll wsllI.ana AWr AW &sl8t%%at
#### Ellen Rosenthal, Respondent, v Richard Rosenthal, Appellant.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Capilli, J.), dated August 21, 1989, as granted those branches of the plaintiff wife’s motion which were to compel him to pay for all repairs to the marital residence, and to be responsible for the marital residence’s lawn and garden upkeep, and denied those branches of his cross motion which were to reduce his pendente lite maintenance obligation to the wife, and to compel the wife to execute documents necessary to refinance or secure an equity loan on the marital residence.

Ordered that the order is modified, as a matter of discretion, by granting that branch of the husband’s cross motion which was to reduce the defendant’s pendente lite maintenance obligation to the extent of reducing that obligation from $175 to $125 per week; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

"The purpose of temporary maintenance is 'to insure that the needy spouse is provided with sufficient funds to meet his *454or her reasonable needs pending trial’ ” *(Crowley v Crowley,*120 AD2d 559, quoting from *Belfiglio v Belfiglio,*99 AD2d 462). "Although a speedy trial is ordinarily the proper remedy to rectify inequities in an order directing the payment of temporary maintenance, pendente lite relief may be modified on appeal where justice so dictates * * *. When the ordered maintenance payments are so prohibitive as to prevent the payor spouse from meeting his or her own financial obligations, relief may be granted” (Wesler *v Wesler,*133 AD2d 627, 628).

The husband here, who currently pays the wife $175 per week for temporary maintenance, is also responsible for paying virtually all of the wife’s expenses, including her household, automobile, and medical expenses. In addition, the husband now has temporary custody of the parties’ two sons, and is solely responsible for their support. The record supports the husband’s contention that his monthly financial obligations exceed his net monthly income. Under the circumstances of this case, a reduction of the wife’s maintenance payments to $125 per week will provide her with sufficient funds to meet her reasonable needs pending trial, and will enable the husband to meet his financial obligations. We have considered the husband’s remaining contentions, and find them to be without merit.

In light of the history of delays, the parties should proceed expeditiously with discovery and trial of this action. Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT32.1

| (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |                                                                               |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |                                                                               |   |
| Date:      May 24, 2010 |   | /s/ Andrew      Schenker                                                      |   |
|                    |   | Andrew      SchenkerChief      Executive Officer(principal      executive officer) |   |
|                    |   |                                                                               |   |
|                    |   |                                                                               |   |
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2096 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the eligibility of 

parents of certain deceased veterans for interment in national cemeteries. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

eligibility of parents of certain deceased veterans for 

interment in national cemeteries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INTERMENT IN NATIONAL CEMETERIES OF 

4 PARENTS OF CERTAIN DECEASED VETERANS. 

5 (a) INTERMENT OF PARENTS OF CERTAIN DE6 CEASED VETERANS.—Section 2402 of title 38, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(9) The parent of a person listed in any of 

10 paragraphs (1) through (4) or paragraph (7) who, at 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2096 IS

1 the time of the parent’s death, does not have a 

2 spouse, surviving spouse, or child who has been in3 terred, or who, if deceased, would be eligible to be 

4 interred, in a national cemetery pursuant to para5 graph (5), but only if— 

6 ‘‘(A) the person so listed dies before the 

7 parent; and 

8 ‘‘(B)(i) the plot in which the person so list9 ed is interred contains sufficient space for the 

10 interment of the parent; and 

11 ‘‘(ii) the parent is interred in that plot.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (9) of section 

13 2402 of title 38, United States Code, shall apply with re14 spect to the death of an eligible parent on or after the 

15 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Regina F. Weller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Z Yachts, Inc on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Z Yachts, Inc.



|                       |                      |                         |  | 
|---------------------- | -------------------- | ----------------------- |  | 
|                       |                      |                        
|Dated: August 20, 2007 | /s/ Regina F. Weller |                        
|                       | Name:                | Regina F. Weller       
|                       | Title:               | Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Cynthia Westheimer v. Heidi Zieimer and all Heart Horse Farm 

Holdings., LLC

Appellate case number: 01-22-00967-CV

Trial court case number: 93883-CV

Trial court: 239th District Court of Brazoria County

The parties’ Agreed Motion for Briefing Schedule is GRANTED. The briefing schedule in 

this appeal shall be as follows:

• Appellant’s brief is due thirty days after the date the record is filed with the Court;

• The combined appellee/cross-appellant’s brief is due thirty days after the date the 

appellant’s brief is filed;

• The combined appellant’s reply/cross-appellee’s brief is due thirty days after the 

date the appellee/cross-appellant’s brief is filed; and

• The cross-appellant’s reply brief is due twenty days after the date the crossappellee’s brief is filed.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ______/s/ Gordon Goodman__________

Acting individually 

Date: ____January 31, 2023_____
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     The undersigned hereby certify that pursuant to the provisionsof 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), the Annual Report on Form 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2004 (the“Form 10-K/A”) of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc.,a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and thatinformation contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company at and for the periods indicated. By:     /s/ David J. Barrett           Name: David J. Barrett Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer By:     /s/ Harry T. Hawks           Name: Harry T. Hawks Title:    Executive Vice President and Chief
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2098 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain isotopic separation machinery 

and apparatus. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BINGAMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain isotopic separation 

machinery and apparatus. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ISOTOPIC MACHINERY AND APPA4 RATUS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.84.05 Isotopic separation cascades 

designed for the enrichment of 

uranium using gaseous centrifuge technology (provided 

for in subheading 8401.20.00) 2.2% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2098 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### L. Harrison, Agent for the Florida Central and Peninsular Railroad Company, and the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. J. H. Jones, Defendant in Error.

Division A.

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Columbia county; John F. White, Judge.

*618John A. Henderson and A. J. Henry for plaintiffs in error.

B. H. Palmer for defendant in error.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants take writ of error. The judgment is affirmed.

Decision *Per Curiam.*
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of DynCorp International LLC (DynCorp) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 1, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen J. Cannon, the Chief Executive Officer of DynCorp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DynCorp.



|Date: | December 14, 2005
|----- | -----------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    STEPHEN J. CANNON             
|Stephen J. Cannon                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(principal executive officer)