alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2132 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chloro-1,8-naphthalic anhydride. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. CORKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chloro-1,8-naphthalic 

anhydride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-CHLORO-1,8-NAPHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4-Chloro-1,8-naphthalic anhydride (CAS No. 4053–08–1) 

(provided for in subheading 

2917.39.30) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2132 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14014-14015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5619]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS12-03]


Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: OCC--250 E Street SW., Room 8C, Washington, DC 20219.
    Date: March 14, 2012.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open.
    Matters To Be Considered:
    Summary Agenda:

February 8, 2012 minutes--Open Session.

(No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the ASC 
requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)
    Discussion Agenda:


[[Page 14015]]


Appraisal Foundation September-November 2011 Grant Reimbursement 
Requests
Revised ASC Delegations of Authority
Hawaii Compliance Review
Montana Compliance Review
Nebraska Compliance Review
New Mexico Compliance Review
New York Compliance Review
Wisconsin Compliance Review

    How to Attend and Observe an ASC meeting: Email your name, 
organization and contact information to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#600d050514090e0713200113034e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bcd1d9d9c8d5d2dbcffcddcfdf92dbd3ca">[email protected]</span></a>. You may also 
send a written request via U.S. Mail, fax or commercial carrier to the 
Executive Director of the ASC, 1401 H Street NW., Ste 760, Washington, 
DC 20005. The fax number is 202-289-4101. Your request must be received 
no later than 4:30 p.m., ET, on the Monday prior to the meeting. 
Attendees must have a valid government-issued photo ID and must agree 
to submit to reasonable security measures. The meeting space is 
intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will 
not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that 
reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, 
photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device 
designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: March 2, 2012.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-5619 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MATTHEW C. COTTEN,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00053-CR 

Appeal from the

432nd Criminal District Court 

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 1227020D) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 14027)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Topics in Development, Signaling, and Disease.                    

*Date:*                         April 3, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Cathy J. Wedeen, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, OD, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01-G, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6878,                         *wedeenc@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: March 2, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-5692 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          380980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    93634
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2026
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                515249
<PP&E>                                          233109
<DEPRECIATION>                                  103496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1421140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            90468
<BONDS>                                         842956
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                           539
<OTHER-SE>                                      374502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1421140
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                407313
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                265279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               39555
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 102479
<INCOME-TAX>                                     42796
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              59683
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (10826)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     48857
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 7, 2018

No. 04-18-00540-CR

Bert VILLA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR1598

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In cause number 2014-CR-1598, Appellant was tried by the court and found guilty of 

repeated violation of a court order. On January 21, 2015, the trial court sentenced Appellant to 

confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice—Institutional Division for eight years

but suspended the sentence and placed Appellant on community supervision. Later, Appellant’s 

community supervision was revoked and Appellant was incarcerated. 

On March 22, 2018, Appellant filed a notice of appeal which this court designated as 

appeal number 04-18-00192-CR. We dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction; our mandate 

issued on July 25, 2018.

On July 27, 2018, in cause number 2014-CR-1598, Appellant filed a motion for leave to 

file a late notice of appeal. 

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Olivo v. 

State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a timely motion for new trial, a 

defendant’s notice of appeal is timely filed if it is filed within thirty days after (1) the day 

sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or (2) the day the trial court enters an appealable 

order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. In this case, the record indicates

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.
A late notice of appeal may be considered timely and invoke a court of appeals’ 

jurisdiction if it meets the following requirements:

(1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing,

(2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen 

days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and 

(3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. 

Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1991) (stating that an out-of-time appeal from a final felony conviction may be 

sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal 

Procedure). 

We ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TWENTY DAYS of the date of 

this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo, 918 

S.W.2d at 522; Ater, 802 S.W.2d at 243.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of August, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Opinion issued July 15, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 14
- 00 443
- CV

——————————— IN RE CAO LA, Relator

O riginal Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus 1

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator , Cao La, seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the cler k of the trial

court , Stan Stanart, to accept for filing a Motion for New Tr ial which was transmitted by La’s service provider to the County Clerk of Harris County on April 25, 2014.

1 The underlying case is Morrell Masonry Supply, Inc. v. Cao La , in the Harris County Civil Court at Law No. 1, cause number 997475.2

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. All outstanding motions
are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown

.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14515-14516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5849]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR12-17-000]


New Mexico Gas Company, Inc.; Notice of Petition for Rate 
Approval

    Take notice that on March 2, 2012, New Mexico Gas Company, Inc. 
(NMGC) filed a Rate Election pursuant to 284.123(b)(1) of the 
Commission's regulations. NMGC proposes to utilize rates that are the 
same as those contained in NMGC's transportation rate schedules for 
comparable intrastate service on file with the New Mexico Public 
Regulation Commission as more fully detailed in the petition.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the

[[Page 14516]]

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d69093849599b8babfb8b385a3a6a6b9a4a296b0b3a4b5f8b1b9a0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eea8abbcada1808287808bbd9b9e9e819c9aae888b9c8dc0898198">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 14, 2012.

    Dated: March 5, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5849 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 23

- 00816

- CR
Walter SCOTT , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 379th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CR6975 Honorable Ron Rangel , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 1, 2023
DISMISSED Appellant pled nolo contendre to murder and was sentenced within the terms of a plea bargain. The trial court’s certification in this appeal s tates: “[T]his criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”
“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: ( a ) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or ( b ) after g etting the trial court’s permission to appeal .” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain , establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended04

- 23

- 00816

- CR

- 2

- by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed and ruled upon before trial , nor does it indi cate the trial court gave its permission to appeal

. See id. The trial court’s certification , therefore, appears to accurately reflect
that this is a plea

- bargain case and appellant does not have a right to appeal

. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d). On September 18, 2023, w e issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed unless an amende d trial court certification was made part of the appellate record by October 18 , 20 23

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); Daniels
v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). On October 16, 2023, counsel for appellant filed a response to this court’s order stating counsel unsuccessfully sought an amended certification authorizing an appeal after which counsel “ reluctantly concludes this court of appeals has little choice but to dismiss the instant attempted appeal .” Accordingly, t his appeal
is dismissed pursuant to Rule 25

. 2 (d)

.

PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, Intertek USA, Inc., 1145 Fourth Street, Gretna, LA 70053, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories:                         *http://cbp.gov/​linkhandler/​cgov/​trade/​automated/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​gaulist.ctt/​gaulist.pdf.*

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on August 17, 2011. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for August 2014.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Mike McCormick, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: February 29, 2012.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. 2012-5738 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Adams, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), rendered December 19, 1989, convicting him of attempted sodomy in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.