alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      31.2





CERTIFICATION




I,
      Mary
      Desmond, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the year ended June 30, 2006,
      of Techprecision Corporation;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.


Dated:
                June 13, 2007
            
            /s/ Mary DesmondMary
                DesmondChief
                Financial Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2020 

To extend the temporary duty suspension on certain capers in immediate 

containers each holding more than 3.4 kilograms. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary duty suspension on certain capers 

in immediate containers each holding more than 3.4 kilograms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CAPERS IN IMMEDIATE CONTAINERS 

4 EACH HOLDING MORE THAN 3.4 KILOGRAMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.28 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 capers prepared or preserved by vinegar in immediate con8 tainers each holding more than 3.4 kilograms) is amended 

9 by striking the date in the effective period column and 

10 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2020 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1876 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 11-Aminoundecanoic acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 11-Aminoundecanoic 

acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 11-AMINOUNDECANOIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.32.49 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 11-Aminoundecanoic acid) is amended— 

7 (1) in the general rate of duty column, by strik8 ing ‘‘2.3%’’ and inserting ‘‘Free’’; and 

9 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

10 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2012’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1876 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to goods entered, 

3 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of 

5 this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA AF 06-0090 

# ORIGINAL
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE COMMISSION ON PRACTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA ORDER

Pursuant to Rule 2A of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, the non-attorney members ofthe CommissiononPractice are appointed bythe Court. Patricia DeVries, a non-attorney member, has resigned. The Court thanks Ms. DeVries for her service to the Commission, the Court, and the people ofMontana. IT ISORDEREDthat Troy McGee ishereby appointed toreplacePatriciaDeVries, as a non-attorney member, for a term endingAugust 31, 2023. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy ofthis Order to the Secretary of State ofthe State of Montana for filing, to the State Bar of Montana, to Patricia DeVries, to Troy McGee, to each member of the Commission on Practice, and to Shelly Smith, Office Administrator for the Commission on Practice. Dated this day ofFebruary, 2022.
ChiefJustice 

# FILED FEB 1 5 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana 02/16/2022

Case Number: AF 06-00902
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

August 7, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00540

- CR

Bert VILLA
, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR1598 Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

In cause number 2014

- CR

- 1598, Appellant was tried by the court and found guilty of repeated violation of a court order

. On January 21, 2015, t he trial court sentenced Appellant to confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

— Institutional Division for eight years but suspended the sentence and placed Appellant on community supervision. Later, Appellant’s community supervision was revoked and Appellant was incarcerated

. On March 22, 2018, Appel lant filed a notice of appeal which this court designated as appeal number 04

- 18

- 00192

- CR. We dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction; our mandate issued on July 25, 2018.
On Ju ly 27, 2018, in cause number 2014

- CR

- 1598, Appellant filed a motion for leave to file a late notice of appeal. A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a timely motion for new trial, a defendant’s notice of appeal i s timely filed if it is filed within thirty days after (1) the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or (2) the day the trial court enters an appealable order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2; Olivo , 918 S.W.2d at 522. In this case, the record ind icates Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.A late notice of appeal may be considered timely and invoke a co urt of appeal s ’

jurisdiction if it meets the following requirements: (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing
, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal
, and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time.

Olivo
, 9 18 S.W.2d at 522 ; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (stating that an out

- of

- time appeal from a final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Pro cedure). We ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order why th is appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo , 918 S.W.2d at 522 ; Ater , 802 S.W.2d at 243.

_________________________________ Patricia O. A lvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of August, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle Clerk of Court
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

Ban. Temseay 

County Attorney 

Petter c4mlty 

&arKllo, Texas 

AUSTIN 

/ 

/” 

Syie 14, 1999 

I ,’ 
Hon. Ttiw f3aay. June 14, 1QSQ. Ps8a 8 

lottsm,he shallbefiinednotl~a tbantuu 

nor aom than riity dollar&* 

we quote rraa mxas Jurlaprudenoe, Vol. ae, page 

4oQ as ~follow%: 

-The tam 'lottemy h&s r&o tso~l 

slgeifleation fn the law, and ~afnoe our 

statute does not proride a dstinftion, 

its IIIMU~ lrust ba d8terraimad fl‘08 popdtu 

~~~ Aocordlng to that teat, a lotfem 

is ~a sohems for the distribution of prfzus 

by lot or~ohrume among those who bave'pald 

or agreed to pay a ooneideratlon ror the 

right to psrtioipate therein, or the distribution itseW.a 

The oourt in'the ease OS Teath%r@olled va+ IndC 

pandent SerTioe 8tatlozl Asao%iation. 10 SW 2nd 121 defined a lottery as follaws: 

The Fsd%ral Cirouit Court oi Appeals inths 

OBBcb ot Peek vs. UnIted qatba. 61 F. 2nd 973, has &rS& 

a lottery the following definition% 

*A SMJ~WIIO far th0 ai%tribt&tOlon Of 

prizcbe or thinga or value br lot or ahems, 

moagpersonswhehaospaldoragMnrdte ,, 

pay a ztaluabla Oon6iaerati0n tOrthe #alulge 

to obtain a rim. A sohrrsa by whiuh a W 

cult Is mo fi ed by scme aation ar mans 

taken, in whteh resnlts man*8 aboioo or will 

hae PO part, nor een hmmn ms~z+..r.rr~ 

aagaoity or deeign enable hN to kna Or 
Hon. Tom Seay', Suae 14, lQS9, Page 5 

deterwiae....uatil the %am ha6 bsea soooraplished," 

The following hare bsea held to be lottsriesr 

Fuaoh boardat slot or rendiag nmehhiae; 

the sale.of boxes of oaady, whioh aoataia 

prizes; emit OlUb6, that is, qlubs formd 

by tallors'for the distr&butIoon of olathes 

by ahaaas; and various grimes in meohaaioal 

nature. 

In the ease, City of Wink vs. Grimth Amusement Company, 100 SW Zad 685, it was +bld that the aeoessary elements of a lottery area 

*Offering or a prize, award or prize 

by ohpaoe, and giving 69 aonsldemtion 

far opportuaity to uin~i)cize.* 

In the aase of'GriffIth J=s==tc=paayg 

WI, xorgan, 98 8W &d 844, It was ,h&.ld that the alemeats 

essential to ooastittte a lottory are e prize ia maasy 

or thIq of talus, dIslqibutIoa by ohease and payaw& 

eithsr dixeotly or indirsetly, of a valuabls ooasideratIoa 

for the ohawe to win the prize. 

In the oases ot State ~a. Rnadls 41 Tsx. Eob 

and Eohma~~ ~8, State 47 8W 850 it was heid that any 

aci~a for&? dl%trlinatioa of prisms by ehawe Is a 

lottery. 

fn View Or the tO~.&.S~ authorities, pOu srs 

I%i3pMtlVelj adViSt3d that it 18 th8 OpmOn Or this dC 

partmeat that the operation of the above described is&em 

18 a riolatfoa 0r the lottery lmva or this state. 

we remain 

Trusting that the roregoin(l aaawe~~ your inquiry, 

Varytrulyyotxre 

ATl'Ow(w GEHERAL OF ‘L’BXM 

ma 

drdtsll wsllI.ana 

AWr AW &sl8t%%at
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Grover F. McBEATH, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 84CA0156.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

June 6, 1985.

Rehearing Denied July 11, 1985.

Certiorari Denied Nov. 4, 1985.

*39Dennis E. Faulk, Dist. Atty., Steven B. Rich, Deputy Dist. Atty., Fairplay, for plaintiff-appellant.

Kathryn J. Kline, Colorado Springs, for defendant-appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

The People appeal a summary judgment in favor of defendant, Grover F. McBeath, on a claim for abatement and forfeiture pursuant to § 16-13-301, et seq., C.R.S. (1978 Repl. Vol. 8) and § 18-18-108, C.R.S. (1984 Cum.Supp.). We affirm.

Pursuant to a search warrant, the residence which defendant shared with three other persons was searched. In addition to drugs and drug paraphernalia, 14 one hundred dollar bills claimed by defendant as belonging to him were seized. Defendant was later convicted of possession of cocaine and marijuana.

On April 7, 1983, the People brought a civil action seeking a declaration that the residence was a public nuisance and also seeking forfeiture of the fixtures and personal property found in the residence. Defendant was served with a summons and complaint on May 4, 1983. Alleging excusable neglect, defendant filed a motion for enlargement of time in which to file an answer on June 1, and a motion to dismiss on June 15. The court granted the motion for enlargement of time on June 21, 1983, and denied the People’s motion for default filed on July 6. The parties then filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and the trial court entered summary judgment for defendant.

I.

On appeal, the People first contend that the trial court erred in denying the motion for default. We disagree.

The trial court has broad latitude under C.R.C.P. 6(b)(2) in permitting enlargement of time within which to file responsive pleadings. *See Reap v. Reap,*142 Colo. 354, 350 P.2d 1063 (1960). We perceive no abuse of that discretion under the circumstances of this case.

II.

The People contend in addition that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant. We disagree.

The burden is upon the People to establish a nexus between the property for which forfeiture is sought and the criminal activity, except as to property *per se*connected to criminal activity. *See People v. Bustam,*641 P.2d 968 (Colo.1982). Here, the People offered no evidence by affidavit or otherwise of any connection between the residence, together with the fixtures and personalty found therein and defendant’s criminal activity. Because there was no evidence, no inference of a nexus is available as there was in *People v. Lot 23,*707 P.2d 1001 (Colo.App.1985)..

Judgment affirmed.

KELLY and METZGER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.80



FPP Cottage Grove LLC
c/o ArcLight Capital Holdings, LLC
200 Clarendon Street, 55th Floor
Boston, MA 02117

September 16, 2002
LSP-Cottage Grove, Inc.
c/o Cogentrix Cottage Grove, LLC
c/o Cogentrix Energy, Inc.
9405 Arrowpoint Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
Attn:  General Counsel and Thomas Schwartz
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to a Membership Interests Purchase Agreement by and between Tomen Power Corporation ("TPC") and Fort Point Power LLC ("FPP") dated as of July 1, 2002, as amended, FPP purchased TPC's membership interests in TPC Funding LLC ("Funding"), which held stock in TPC Cottage Grove, Inc. ("TPC Cottage Grove"), the effect of which was to indirectly transfer TPC Cottage Grove to FPP (the "Transaction").  The Transaction closed on September 4, 2002.
Prior to the closing of the Transaction, Funding converted TPC Cottage Grove from a "C" corporation to a limited liability company (the "Conversion").  The Conversion took place on September 3, 2002.  As a result of and upon the closing of the Transaction and the consummation of the Conversion, TPC Cottage Grove's name and location changed to FPP Cottage Grove LLC, c/o ArcLight Capital Holdings, LLC, 200 Clarendon Street, 55th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02117.  As such, FPP Cottage Grove LLC (the "FPP Subsidiary") is the successor in interest to TPC Cottage Grove under the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of LSP-Cottage Grove Limited Partnership, dated as of June 30, 1995, as amended (as amended, the "Partnership Agreement") by and among TPC Cottage Grove and certain other parties thereto.
Please forward any and all notices and information to which the FPP Subsidiary may be entitled to the following address:

ArtLight Energy Partners Fund I, L.P.
c/o ArcLight Capital Holdings, LLC
200 Clarendon Street, 55th Floor
Boston, MA 02117

Please note that all cash distributions and other amounts to which we are entitled pursuant to the terms of the Partnership Agreement should continue to be sent directly to The Bank of New York as the Depositary Bank until such time as you receive instructions to the contrary from the Depositary Bank (as such term is defined in the Deposit and Disbursement Agreement dated as of March 27, 1998, as amended, among Funding, the Funding Subsidiary and certain other parties thereto).
Please contact us should you desire information to assist you in making the necessary self-recertification of qualifying facility status under FERC's regulations.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 617-531-6307 with any questions.



|Very truly yours,
By:  /s/      Carter A. Ward
           Carter A. Ward
           Vice President
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cc:     LS Power Corporation
          45 Walden Street, Suite 2D
          Concord, Massachusetts 01742
          Attn:  Frank Hardenbergh
Exhibit 31.1   CERTIFICATION   I, Peter Toscano, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q of International Power Group, Ltd.;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.    Date:  September 21, 2007 /s/Peter ToscanoPeter Toscano(Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors)
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14**

**PROMULGATED UNDER**

**SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Michael Angerthal, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CBRE Realty Finance, Inc.; 

2. Based onmy knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and 

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986, Section III E.] 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 9, 2006