alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5524]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Arts Advisory Panel Meeting

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the 
Arts and Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be 
held by teleconference at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20506 as follows (ending time is 
approximate): Media Arts (application review): March 16, 2012. This 
meeting, from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. EDT, will be closed.

DATES: March 16, 2012, from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. EDT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Further information with reference to 
these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of 
Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, 
Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The closed portions of meetings are for the 
purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of February 15, 2012, these sessions will be closed to the 
public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United 
States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels that are open to the public, and if time allows, may be 
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman. If you need any accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact the Office of Accessibility, National 
Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days 
prior to the meeting.

    Dated: March 2, 2012.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2012-5524 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of Intent to Renew; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects a reference in the text of the 30-day Notice of Intent to Renew an agency collection of information, Regulations Governing Bankruptcies of Commodity Brokers (OMB Control No. 3038-0021). The notice that is being corrected was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 5, 2012, 77 FR 13101.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Martin B. White, Office of the General Counsel, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418-5129; Fax: (202) 418-5567; email:                         *mwhite@cftc.gov.*

## Correction

                        In the Notice of Intent to Renew, beginning on page 13101 in the issue of March 5, 2012, make the following correction. On page 13101 in the middle column in the third paragraph under                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         replace the sentence “The                         **Federal Register**                         notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of information was published on December 29, 2012 (73 FR 81916).” with the sentence “The                         **Federal Register**                         notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of information was published on December 29, 2011 (76 FR 81916).”                    

Dated: March 6, 2012.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2012-5807 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# L_2006339DE.01003902.xml

| 6.12.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 339/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 339/39

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2006/66/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 6. September 2006 über Batterien und Akkumulatoren sowie Altbatterien und Altakkumulatoren und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 91/157/EWG

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 266 vom 26. September 2006
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 266 vom 26. September 2006

Seite 7, Artikel 12 Absatz 4:

anstatt:

„Das Recycling muss spätestens am 26. September 2010 ...“

muss es heißen:

„Das Recycling muss spätestens am 26. September 2011 ...“

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Charles J. Schreiber Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2007



/s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director
EXHIBIT 32.1

906 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, that:

         (1) The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
         August 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Company.




         Date: November 26, 2003                /s/ David H. Roche
                                                -----------------------------
                                                President and Chief
                                                 Executive Officer


                                                /s/ Steven M. Caspers
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Executive Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer


                                                                              70
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Harold Palacios, Respondent.

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), dated April 19, 1990, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 30.30 (1) (a) to dismiss the indictment.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the motion is denied, the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

In granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on statutory speedy trial grounds, the Supreme Court found that 196 days were chargeable to the People. Included within the total of 196 days charged to the People, were the last 22 days (i.e., March 8, 1989 through March 30, 1989) of a 36-day period between the defendant’s indictment and arraignment on that indictment (i.e., February 22, 1989 through March 30, 1989). We disagree with the Supreme Court’s determination.

It is undisputed that "the court clerk, pursuant to the *746practice in Queens County, scheduled [the defendant’s] arraignment on the indictment” *(People v Lopez,*149 AD2d 735). In *People v Rivera*(160 AD2d 234), the Appellate Division, First Department, excluded the entire period between indictment and arraignment on the ground that:

"Of those periods in issue herein, we first consider the 22-day period from the filing of the indictment until defendant was arraigned * * *.

"[W]e hold that as a matter of law the entire 22 days is excludable * * *. In the instant case * * * the delay was visited upon defendant by the court, not the prosecutor, who had no role in calendering the arraignment. Indeed, the court advised defendant when to appear by sending a notice to him. The People should, therefore, not be charged with this delay, which was concededly occasioned by Supreme Court” *(People v Rivera, supra,*at 234-235; *see also, People v Khan,*172 AD2d 231).

We are aware of the recent Court of Appeals decision in *People v Correa*(77 NY2d 930, 931), wherein the Court of Appeals held that "[d]elays between indictment and the arraignment * * * are * * * not excludable under CPL 30.30”. However, *People v Correa (supra),*is distinguishable from the case at bar since it did not involve the situation where the court clerk fixes the arraignment date. Viewed within the particular framework of this case *(see, People v Rivera, supra),*the amount of time properly chargeable to the People was within the allowable six-calendar-month statutory limitation. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion is denied and the indictment is reinstated. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Kunzeman and Miller, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 24, 2015

No. 04-15-00350-CV

Jack RETTIG,

Appellant

v.

Ronald E. BRUNO, Christopher Garcia, Sergio Lopez, Patrick G. Mendoza, 

and Troy J. Williams,

Appellees

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVQ000699 D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee Patrick G. Mendoza has filed a notice stating that he is in bankruptcy. The 

notice states that the bankruptcy proceeding is pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for 

the Western District of Texas in San Antonio, under Case No. 15-52801-cag, styled In re Patrick 

G. Mendoza and Gloria C. Mendoza. The notice contains an authenticated copy of the page[s] 

of the bankruptcy petition showing that the petition was filed on November 16, 2015. 

Accordingly, the appeal and all time periods are stayed from the date the bankruptcy petition was 

filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. 

It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is ABATED. For administrative purposes, the 

appeal will be treated as a closed case, unless and until it is reinstated in accordance with Rule 

8.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of November, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #13024]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) declaration for the State of Connecticut, dated 02/29/2012. *Incident:*
                         Major Winter Storm. *Incident Period:*
                         10/29/2011. *Effective Date:*
                         02/29/2012. *EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/29/2012.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Hartford. *Contiguous Counties:* Connecticut: Litchfield, Middlesex, New Haven, New London, Tolland. Massachusetts: Hampden. PercentThe Interest Rates are:Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 130240. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Connecticut, Massachusetts. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002) Dated: February 29, 2012. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2012-5718 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Doreen E. Schaub, Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 30, 1989, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant testified that she left her job because she was upset with a new employee who slowed down the pace of her assembly line, causing, her to lose incentive pay, and because she was being transferred to a more difficult line where she could not earn incentive pay. Although testimony was conflicting as to whether claimant told anyone she was leaving, this is of little or no significance as it is clear that claimant left without permission. In addition, claimant testified that "common sense” indicated that her job would be in jeopardy if she left and there was evidence that claimant had been warned that she could be discharged if she failed to accept an assignment. Under the circumstances, the conclusion that claimant’s actions constituted misconduct disqualifying her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits is supported by substantial evidence *(see, Matter of Nunes [Roberts],*98 AD2d 934; *Matter of Centineo [Levine]*53 AD2d 759).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
#### Kermit Arthur BELGARDE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 73-2553.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 30, 1974.

Samuel M. Haskins, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.

Eugene A. LaLonde, Asst. U. S. Atty., Billings, Mont., for respondent-appellee.

Before DUNIWAY, WRIGHT and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Belgarde appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The sentence was life imprisonment on two counts of second degree murder to which he pleaded guilty after the charge was reduced from first degree murder.

Belgarde has had two previous § 2255 motions denied. In this third petition he raises two new points.

First, he seeks to lay the blame for the deaths of his two victims to others for delaying medical treatment, asserting that his trial was tainted by withheld evidence which established this fact. We agree with the district court that the point is without merit.

However, Belgarde’s second contention requires that we reverse and remand. At the time he was sentenced, Belgarde was twenty years old and therefore eligible for sentencing under the Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5010. As was within his power under § 5010(d), the trial judge sentenced Belgarde as an adult but without explicitly finding that Belgarde would not benefit from the sentencing alternatives available under the Act. In Dorszynski v. United States, 418 U.S. 424, 94 S.Ct. 3042, 41 L.Ed.2d 855 (1974), the Court held such an explicit finding was required by § 5010(d).

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2040 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Hexanediol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Hexanediol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,2 HEXANEDIOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1,2 Hexanediol (CAS No. 

6920–22–5) (provided for in 

subheading 2905.39.90) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2040 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50048 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE ROBERT GALICIA-PENA, also known as Jose Roberto Galicia-Pena, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-721-1

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Jose Robert Galicia-Pena (“Galicia”) appeals following his conviction in a bench trial for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Galicia argues that the district court committed reversible plain error by increasing the maximum authorized Guidelines sentence based on facts neither admitted nor found by a jury, and by imposing a sentence under a mandatory Guidelines scheme. Galicia correctly concedes that he cannot carry his burden of showing that theNo. 05-50048 -2- district court’s error affected his substantial rights. See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo , 407 F.3d 728, 733-34 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556); United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 521 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517). Galicia also argues that because his indictment did not allege a prior felony conviction, he was subject to a maximum sentence of two years under U.S.C. § 1326(a). He correctly acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
IN ITI AL REVI E W ENG I NEER I NG REPORT PMN : 15

- 0025 S t anda r d Review Dra f t 12/23/20 1 4 ENG I N EER : Macek \ REC PV ( kg/yr) : 273,000 YX Rev i sion Notes 

### I Assessme nt Overview : 1 2/23/ 1 4 update : The previous vers i o n of the I RER ( 1 0/27/ 1 4) was mod ifi ed to i nclude s it e - spec ifi c i nformat i on o n env i ronmen t a l releases a t t he Mo rri s , I L site tha t was p r ov i ded i n an a t tachment t o the PMN submi ss i on . SUBMI TTER : Akzo Nobe l Sur f ace Chemi str y LLC

Consumer Use : No SAT (concern s) (10/2 1 /20 1 4) :PB T ra ti ng : Pl B2T l H

ea l th : 1

- 2 Dermal , I nha l a t ion E co : 3 Wa t er (A l l re l eases to water wi th a CC 

### = 1 ppb), XB T esting (Tes t ing des i red) OCCUPAT I ONAL EXPOSURE RAT I NG : lA NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTI ONS :IN I T I AL REVI EW ENG I NEER I NG REPORT PMN : 1 5

- 0025IN IT I AL REVI E W ENG I NEER I NG REPORT**P~ :**