alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification**

**Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

|                                       |                                                             |                             |
|--------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                                       |                                                             |
|                                  |                                                        |                        |
| Dated: November              19, 2007 |                                                        | /s/ Bob              Marbut |
|                                       | Name: Title: Co-Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                       |                                                             |

|                                       |                                                |                                 |
|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                                |
|                                  |                                           |                            |
| Dated: November              19, 2007 |                                           | /s/ Ron              Chaimovski |
|                                       | Name: Ron              Chaimovski              |
|                                       | Title: Co-Chief              Executive Officer |

|                                         |                                               |                                                     |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                         |                                               |
|                                    |                                          |                                                |
| Dated: November                19, 2007 |                                          | /s/ Donald                F.                Neville |
|                                         | Name: Donald                F. Neville        |
|                                         | Title: Chief                Financial Officer |
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515. License no.
Name/Address
Date reissued020479F
Karon Jones dba Keen Machinery and Export,425 Sandy Lane, Dublin, TX 76446
February 11, 2012.021869F
Merco Air & Ocean Cargo, Inc., 6 Fir Way, Cooper City, FL 33026
February 1, 2012.022258F
Platinum Moving Services, Inc. 7610-P Rickenbacker Drive,  Gaithersburg, MD 20879
January 04, 2012.
 Vern W. Hill, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 2012-5558 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
# L_2006099EN.01001501.xml

| 7.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 99/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 99/15

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 569/2006

of 6 April 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 23rd partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 23rd partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 28,797 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 7 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 April 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 185, 16.7.2005, p. 3.

2

---
Exhibit
10.1


AGREEMENT TO AMEND
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


WHEREAS,
Activision, Inc. (the “Company”) and Robert A. Kotick (the “Executive”) have
previously entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as
of May 22, 2000 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”);


WHEREAS, the
Company has from time to time granted to the Executive options to acquire
shares of its common stock (the “Options”);


WHEREAS, Section
409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) may impose
adverse consequences on the Executive with respect to certain provisions of the
Employment Agreement and the Options; and


WHEREAS,  the Company and the Executive desire to amend
the Employment Agreement and the Options in order to comply with the applicable
requirements of Section 409A, thereby avoiding such adverse consequences.


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants contained herein, and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


1.                                       Sections
10(b)(i) and 10(b)(ii) of the Employment Agreement are each amended by deleting
the phrase “(as adjusted pursuant to Section 10(b)(iv))”.


2.                                       Section
10(b) of the Employment Agreement is amended by deleting Sections 10(b)(iv) and
10(b)(v) and each Option is amended by deleting all references therein to such
sections or comparable provision contained therein.


3.                                       The
parties acknowledge and agree that (1) Section 10(b)(iv) of the Employment Agreement
was a material term thereof and a material inducement for the Executive to
enter into the Employment Agreement and (2) the parties have agreed to delete
such Section because they have been advised by counsel that such provision
could cause adverse tax consequences under Section 409A of the Code if it is
not deleted prior to December 31, 2006. 
Accordingly, the parties agree to negotiate in good faith to promptly
develop an amendment to the Employment Agreement to provide benefits reasonably
comparable to those provided in Section 10(b)(iv) in a manner that satisfies
the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.


4.                                       Except
as specifically set forth herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms.


5.                                       This
Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original.









 



IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this      
day of December, 2006.


	
  

  	
  ACTIVISION, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Robert A. Kotick
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60804 Conference Calendar

WILLIE H. BANKHEAD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:94CV26-S-D

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Former prisoner Willie Bankhead appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous. Bankhead contends that the district court erred by dismissing his complaint on the ground that he attempts to relitigate claims alleging substantially the same facts arising from a common series of events that already have been litigated. We have reviewed Bankhead’s brief and the record and we find Bankhead’s appeal frivolous. See Pittman v. Moore , 980 F.2d 994, 994 (5th Cir.No. 96-60804 - 2 - 1993). APPEAL DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 2, 2015

NO. 03

- 15

- 00558

- CV

ATX Painting Company, Inc., Appellant

v.

Fine Line Commercial, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JU STICES PURYEAR, GOOD WIN, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l court on August 19, 2015.

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court

agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses

the appeal

. A ppellant shall pay all c osts relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court

below.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00692-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Billy RODOLFO RAMIREZ,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CVK001350D1

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 27, 2023

AFFIRMED

The State appeals the trial court’s order granting Billy Rodolfo Ramirez habeas relief. We 

affirm.

BACKGROUND

As part of Operation Lone Star, Billy Rodolfo Ramirez, a noncitizen, was arrested for 

trespassing on private property in Webb County. He filed an application for writ of habeas corpus 

seeking dismissal of the criminal charge based on a violation of his state and federal rights to equal 

protection. Specifically, Rodolfo Ramirez asserted that the State of Texas was engaging in 
04-22-00692-CR

- 2 -

selective prosecution because only men were being charged with misdemeanor criminal trespass. 

The trial court granted Rodolfo Ramirez’s requested relief, and the State appealed.

DISCUSSION

In State v. Del Campo-Chavez, we considered a State’s appeal from a grant of habeas relief 

to a male OLS defendant who sought dismissal of his misdemeanor criminal trespass charge on 

equal protection grounds. ___ S.W.3d ___, No. 04-22-00737-CR, 2023 WL 4916433, at *2 (Tex. 

App.—San Antonio Aug. 2, 2023, no pet. h.). Del Campo-Chavez argued the State selectively 

prosecuted him on the basis of his gender. See id. The State responded that the trial court lacked 

jurisdiction, Del Campo-Chavez’s equal protection claim based on gender was not cognizable, and 

Del Campo-Chavez failed to carry his burden to prove the prosecution was motivated by a 

discriminatory purpose. See id. (citing Ex parte Aparicio, No. 04-22-00623-CR, 2023 WL 

4095939, at *1, *8–12 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 21, 2023, pet. filed) (en banc); Ex parte 

Hargett, 819 S.W.2d 866, 869 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991), superseded by statute on other grounds as 

stated in Ex parte Villanueva, 252 S.W.3d 391, 397 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008)). Relying on Ex parte 

Aparicio, we rejected the State’s arguments and affirmed the trial court’s order. Id. at *2, 3.

The State’s claims in this case are identical to those we addressed in Del Campo-Chavez. 

For the reasons described in that opinion, and in Ex parte Aparicio, we affirm the trial court’s order 

granting habeas relief.

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH
# L_2006003EN.01001201.xml

| 6.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 3/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 3/12

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 11/2006

of 5 January 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the import of sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 2094/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003, on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction from third countries in the duty on sorghum imported into Spain was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2094/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction from third countries in the duty on sorghum imported into Spain was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2094/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 30 December 2005 to 5 January 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on imported sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 2094/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 6 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 January 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005 p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 335, 21.12.2005, p. 4.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          30,901
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     51,533
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           9,106
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             9,203
<LOANS>                                        181,183
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 295,313
<DEPOSITS>                                     268,808
<SHORT-TERM>                                       443
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,407
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,562
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,093
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 295,313
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 20,779
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,511
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   536
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                24,827
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,402
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,831
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,996
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,246
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,595
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,880
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.61
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,644
<LOANS-PAST>                                       854
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 11,573
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,514
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,333
<RECOVERIES>                                       597
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,024
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,024
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# Kristine Arlitt Attorney at Law 206 East Locust Street 500 Main Street San Antonio, Texas 78212 Kerrville, Texas 78028 P.O. Box 90771 P.O. Box 295101 San Antonio, Texas 78209 Kerrville, Texas 78029 Telephone 210-821-6101 Telephone 830-896-5101 Telecopier 210-821-6105 Telecopier 830-896-5102 July 9, 2015

Clerk of the Court Via E-File Fourth Court of Appeals Bexar County Justice Center, Floor 3 San Antonio, Texas 78205 RE: The Estate of Consuella Perkins Ulbrich, deceased Cause Number 2011-PC-0686 Appeal Number 04-14-00812-CV Dear Clerk: Please take notice, I will not be available for any proceedings in the above referenced matter for the following dates: July 20, 2015 to July 28, 2015 September 3 to September 15, 2015 October 22, 2015 to November 2, 2015 December 17, 2015 to December 28, 2015 Respectfully, I request that no matters be set during these time periods. As always, please feel free to contact me directly with any question at 210-269-6101. Very truly yours, /s/ Kristine Arlitt Attorney at Law cc: Bill Bailey Via E-Service Philip M. Ross Via E-Service Amy Bitter Via E-Service William D. Crist Via E-Service ACCEPTED 04-14-00812-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7/9/2015 6:49:13 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
**Exhibit
      32.1**







**RAVEN
      GOLD CORP.**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Raven Gold Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
      the
      period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Blair Naughty, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
original
      of this written
      statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Raven Gold Corp. and
      will
      be retained by Raven Gold Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





December
                14, 2007
            By:
            /s/ *Blair
              Naughty*Blair
              NaughtyChief
              Executive Officer