ENTE" "---" -t. @ervices Pollution Control System Eva•uation

and Source En•issiens

Testing June 15, 2007 Mr. Cort Peavy Environmental Manager Jenkins Brick Company 1228 N. I•cDonough Montgomery, Alabama

36104 Subject: •iACT Testing

PM, NC• & HF D•FF Etaghouse

Stack Montgomery, Alabama

Facility Entec Proposal

No.: 27154 Dear Mr. Peavy, Please find attached

three (3) copies

of the final report for the MACT Testing

for Particulate Matter,

Hydrogen

Chloride

and Hydrogen

Fluoride

in the main stack DIFF Baghouse performed

at your facility in Montgomery,

AL on June 5, 2007. We appreciate

the opportunity

to perform

this project

for you and hope to be of assistance to you in the future. If you have any questions

please call 205/491-6676. Sincerely, Entec Services,

inc. •/"•yn•lpB• a ne "---O•e•Manager

16-D Commerce

Avenue

Hueytown,

Alabama

35023 Phone: (205) 491-6676

Fax (205) 491-6614 www.entecservices.comENTEC S ices
Poflution Control System Evaluation

and Source Emissions

Testing Jenkins Brick Montgomery, Alabama

MACT Testing Main Stack

D•FF

8aghouse

June 5, 2007 Entec Project

No." 27154

18-D Commerce

Avenue

Hueytown,

Alabama

35023 Phone: (205) 481-6676

Fax (205) 491-6614 www.entecservices.comEntec Services, Inc, 16 D Commerce

Avenue Hueytown, Alabama

35023 Telephone: (205) 491-6676 Fax: (205) 491-6614 Results of the June 5, 2007 MACT Testing

on the Main Stack

DIFF Baghouse

Located

in Montgomery, Alabama

S u b m itted to: Jenkins Brick

Company 1228 N McDonough Montgomery, Alabama

36104 Attention: Mr. Cort Peavy
Entec Project

No. 27154 Completed By:

Art Otero project Leader Report Submitted:

June 15, 2007 Reviewed By:

Tom Lotz Technical Services

Manager hereby certify to the best of my knowledge

all field sampling

and laboratory

analysis

performed for this report is authentic

and accurate,

it has been checked

for completeness

and accuracy.Jenkins Brick Table of Contents Section Pa_qe No. Executive Summary Emissions Summary Detailed Test Results Sampling Procedures Location of Test Ports •;•t;•u•i 26A Sampling

Train Field Data Sheets.

Main Stack Test Run No. 1 Test Run No. 2 Test Run No. 3 Control Room Data Test Protocol Quality Control

I Quality Assurance

Procedures Field QA I QC Checklist Meter Orifice and Temperature

Check Sheet. Fyrite Standardization

Sheet Method 5126A Sample

Recovery

Sheet Laboratory Analysis Audit Sample

Results Equipment Calibrations Nomenclature and Test Calculations 12371112131417202325283334363940444859Executive Summary Entec Services,

inc. was retained

by Jenkins

8rick Company

to perform

additional MACT testing for particulate

matter

hydrogen

chloride

and hydrogen

fluoride

•n the D•FF 8aghouse

Stack at the facility located

in Montgomery,

Alabama.

Mr. Art Otero,. and Mr. Trent McMahan

of Entec Services,

inc. conducted

the testing on June 5, 2007. Representing the Alabama

Department

of Environmental

Management

(ADEM)

was Mr. Bryan Brumfieid

and Mr. Patrick

Byrd. Mr. Cort Peavy of Jenkins

Brick help coordinate the testing with operations.
ADEM provided

audit samples

that were supplied

to the lab and have been included

in the laboratory

analysis

section.

All audit samples

were verified

by ADEM / EPA as passing.
No difficulties

were encountered

in the field or in the laboratory

analysis

of the samples by Entec Services,

Inc. The particulate

and HCI / HF emissions

test summary

on the following page gives a detailed

summary

of each test run compared

to the maximum emission limits set forth by the Alabama

Department

of Environmental

Management. (ADEM). Test results

indicate

the particulate

emissions

are below the limits set forth by the ADEM Permit No. 209-0011-X006.SOURCE

OWNER: PLANT LOCATION: SOURCE(S) NAME(S): SOURCE(S) CONDITION: SOURCE(S) SHAPE: Entec

Services, Inc. SOURCE OVERVIEW
Jenkins Brick Montgomery, AL DIFF Baghouse

Stack MACT testing with Lime Rate at 60 Lb/Hr Circular PROBE WASH CHEMICAL: SOURCE PERMIT NUMBER: TEST PERFORMED: ADDITIONAL TEST REQUIREMENTS: •EFERENCE METHOD

TESTS:

PROJECT MANAGER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST

PROJECT

LEADER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST

ASSISTANT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: RULING AGENCY RULING AGENCY

REPRESENTATIVE: )ATES TESTS CONDUCTED: ENTEC PROJECT

NUMBER: Acetone 209-0011-X006 Particulate

and HCI/HF Testing BRICK MACT Subpart JJJJJ Sample Location

EPA Method

1 Volumetric Flow

EPA Method

2 Molecular Weight

EPA Method

3 Moisture Content

EPA Method

4 Particulate EPA Method

5 HCI and HF

EPA Method

26A Mr. Lynn Beane Mr. Art Otero Mr, Trent McMahan Mr. Cort Peavy Alabama Department

of Environmental

Management Mr, Bryan BPumfield

and Mr, Patrick Byrd 06/05/07 27154ENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 INPUT TEST DATA Client: Source: Jenkins Brick DIFF Baghouse

Stack Field Data Run Number Test Date Time Test Run Began Ended Sampling Time !Stack Area Barometric Pressure Stack Static Pressure Pi.tot Tube Correction

factor Meter Correction

Factor Meter Delta H @ Nozzle Diameter Vleter Volume Meter Temperature Avg. Orifice Delta H Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture) Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) Oxygen Concentration,

dry basis Carbon Dioxide Concentration,

dry basis Avg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P Stack Temperature Total Hydrogen

Chloride collected,

mg Total Hydrogen

Fluoride collected,

mg Total particulate

collected Job No.: Data Input By:

27154 Art Otero Symbol Units Test Data

AsPbar
Cp
Y•H@On

Wimto Militaq/Time minutes

in. Hg in. H20

in.inches dcf

in. H20 grams grams

(in. H20)F CO= (sqrt

HCL mg HF mg
mn

06/05/07 0800-0904 60 27.494 29.85 -0.25 0.84 1.004 1.800 0.300 39.861 85.9 1.29 76.9 10.4 17.03.0 0.523 402.61.80.541.6

06/05/07 095O- O54 60 27.494 29.85 -0.29 0.84 1.004

3

AVERAGE 06/05/07 1132-1237 60 6O 27.494 29.85 29.85 -0.27 0.84 1.004 -0.27 0.84 1 .O04 1.800 1.800

1.800 0.300 0.300

0.300 40.086

mg 93.6 1.30 76.2 10.0 16.5. 3.0 0.526

40.214 100.4 1.27 79.49.817.0 4.0 0.518 412.3 2.20.121.2 403.71.8 0.372.0

40.054 93.3 1.29 77.5 10.1 16.83.3 0.522 406.21.90.31.6ENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave. Hueyt•wn. Alabama 35023 CALCULATED TEST DATA Client: Jenkins Brick Source: DIFF Baghouse Stack Description Run Number Formulas

Symbol
lest Date Time Began-Ended 1. Stack Pressure P• Pr•113.• 2. Meter Pressure Pb• •H 113.6 3. Standard Meter Volume 17.64- Y* (VrJT=)* (P• +/'H 113.6 4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed Cb Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel :0.04706"W•,• =0.04715"Wm 5. Moisture Fraction 9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis 10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis

=(V•lszd V•altCd))/(Vwc•sld

V•,F•st= 0.32"(O=)+ 0.44"(CO2)+0.28"(100-(O2)-(CO2))
11. Average Stack Gas Velocity 12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Condilions

85.49*Cp*(sqrt L•P),,,•*SQRT((T=)

(P=*Mw)]
13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions 14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions 14b. Hydrogen Chlodde concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. 14b. Hydrogen Fluoride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. 15. Particulate concentration @ Standard Conditions =(0.01543*HCL•}/Q=• =(0.01543•HF•,•)IQ=d =0.01543"m./V•s•d 15b. Hydrogen Chloride emissions, Ibs per hour

=(60/7000)'HCLQ•*Q=I¢ =(60/7000)*HFQ=,•*Q=• 15b. Hydrogen Fluoride emissions, Ibs per hour 21. Particulate emissions 22. Volume collected through nozzle =T=IP=*[0.002669*V•÷ 23. Particulate concentration,

@ actual conditions =o.01543*m./V. .•4. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent 100*Vnl (6l)"v=*A.*(•)

=ost Meter Orifice Cal. (EMC ALT-009 Yqa) % Difference, (Calibration must be within 5% of original Y-factor) Ps

MdMs
Q=

HCLcs HFcs

c• HCI -Ibslhr HF -Ibslhr PMRV,

ca Units

Military Time in. Hg in, Hg dscf scfscf fraction g/g-mole g/g-mole
•s acfm

d•fm grldscf gr/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr Ibslhr

acf gdacf %

Job NO.:

27154 Data Input By: Art Otero Calculated Data
06/05107 0800-0904 29.83 06105107 0950-1054 29.83

06/05/07 1132-1237 29.83 AVERAGE

29.83 29.94 29.95

29.94

29.94 38.724 38.404

38.054

38.394 3.619 3.586

3.737

3.647 0.490 0.472

0,462 0,0994 0.0956 0.0959

0.475 0.0970 29.160 29.140

29,320

29.207 28.089 28.076

28.195

28.120 38.14 62,912 38,380 38.34

37.89 62,500 37,704 33,958 63,247 38,532 34,850 34,698 0.001 0.001

0,001 0.000 0.000

0.000 0.0006 0.0005 0.25

38,121

0.0008 62,886

0.22 0.21 0.06 0.04 0.19 0.24

38,206 34,502 0.001 0.000 0.0006 0.23 0.01 0.04 0.15 0.19 70.212 69.698

70.041

69.984 0.0004 0.0004

0.0003

0.0004 104.18 102.87

104.62

103.89
0.9694 0.9761

0.9642

0.9699 fl.40o/,Procedures The emission

rates were determined

using EPA Methods

1 5, and 26A of CFR Title 40, Part 60, Appendix

A. The calibration

and quality

assurance

procedures

of EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix

A for all methods,

and the "Quality

Assurance

Handbook

for Air Pollution

Measurement

System"

Volume

III Stationary

Source-Specific

Methods were followed

throughout

the duration

of the field and laboratory

testing. The most current

version

for each method

(as described

in the Federal

Register)

was used. Stack Gas Volumetric

Flow Methods

1 and • The velocity

of the gas stream was determined

according

to EPA Reference

Method

1 and 2 by reading

the instantaneous

velocity

head with an inclined

manometer

at each sampling point with a calibrated

S-type

pitot tube attached

adjacent

to the sample nozzle. The stack pressure

was measured

with the static side of an S-type pitot tube. A calibrated

pyrometer

was used to measure

stack temperature

at each sampling

point. The stack was tested for cyclonic

flow according

to EPA Reference

Method

1. Stack Gas Molecular

Weiqht

Method

3 The carbon

dioxide

and oxygen

concentrations

were determined

using EPA Reference Method 3 (Fyrite Method).

A sample

of the flue gas was extracted

from the gas stream during each test. These

samples

were analyzed

with a Fyrite gas analyzer.

The molecular weight of the gas was calculated

using the moisture,

oxygen

and carbon dioxide content

and the measured

stack gas temperature. Moisture Content

Method

4 The moisture

content

used for calculating

the gas stream

flow rate was determined

by measuring the amount

of condensed

moisture

in the glass impingers

and silica gel impinger in the sampling

train as described

in EPA Reference

Method

4 at the completion of each test. Hvdro_clen Chloride

/ Hydrogen

Fluoride

with Particulate

Method

5126A Preliminary data was used to determine

stack temperature,

pressure,

and range of velocity heads, moisture

content

and stack gas dry molecular

weight prior to sampling.The

meter box was leak ch•cked

from the pump to the orifice.

Initial and final leak checks of the sampling

system

and pitot lines were performed

as outlined

in Method

5 and were recorded

on the data sheets.

The nozzle

(glass or Teflon with an angle of taper of 30 degrees

and of button hook design)

was calibrated

before and after the test using a micrometer

and was also recorded

on the data sheets. The sampling

probe was placed at each sampling

point to provide

a total sampling

time of at least 60 minutes

and a volume

of at least 31.8 cubic feet. The gases were drawn through a teflon nozzle

attached

to a heated

glass lined probe.

The gases then proceeded through

borosilicate

glass filter holder, with a Teflon frit filter support

through
a tarred Teflon filter to remove

particulate

matter.

The exit of the filter will bemaintained at a temperature

of greater

than 248 0 F. These temperatures

were recorded

at each point on the data sheets. The gases were then scrubbed

through

a series of four impingers

(optional

impinger

not included) to capture

hydrogen

halides

and halogens

and moisture.

The first and second impingers

contained

approximately

100 ml of a 0.1N H2SO4 solution

and the third and fourth impingers

contained

approximately

100 ml of a 0.1 N NaOH solution. The fifth impinger

contained

approximately

250 grams of pre-weighed

silica gel to remove any remaining

moisture.

The gases passed

through

the impinger

series in an ice bath to maintain

a maximum

exit temperature

of 68 0 F. This temperature

was recorded on the data sheets.

The clean and cool gases then entered

the meter box where the gas flow and temperature

were measured. After the completion

of the test leak rate determinations

were made. Then the sampling train and the probe nozzle assembly

was transferred

to the cleanup

area making

sure no particulate

was lost. The cleanup

data was recorded. Particulate catches

were placed

in sealed petri dishes.

Each acetone

rinse from the nozzle, probe, and filter holder was combined

and placed in a sealed container.

For the group of tests an acetone

blank of approximately

200 milliliters

was placed in a sealed container. The first and second

impinger

contents

were weighed

and then transferred to its recove,•"

container

with the rinsing from the connecting

glassware

were added to this container.

The third and fourth contents

were weighed

and the contents

discarded.Ihe-silica-gel-from-the•fifth-impinger-was-weig•hed•-A-btar•k-ef-the-sulfu •ic-acid--sotution and acetone

was taken. These containers

were clearly marked

and transported

to the laboratory for analysis.

The laboratory

we used was Stillbrook

Analytical.Entec Services,

Inc 16 D Commerce

Ave. Hueytown

AL 35023 STACK DRAWING

& TRAVERSE

POINT LOCATION Client: Jenkins Brick Job No. 27154 Soume: DIFF Baghouse

Stack Input By: Art Otero Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate

(P):

p

Port Type

Flange

Port Diameter

6.0" Stack Diameter, inches:

7t Stack Area, FtZ: 27.494 Stack Height, feet:

60 Number of Ports: 2 Stack Properties:

Inches

Duct Diameters

Length of Port, inches: 10.50 Upstream Disturbance:

156.0

2.20

Total Number of Traverse Points:

12 Downstream Disturbance:

504.0

7.10

Number of Points per diameter: 6 71.0 INCHES Point N(•

Inside Stack

Outside Nipple Inches Inches 1 3.t 13.6 2 10.4 20.9 3 21.0 31.5 4 60.0 60.5 NCHES 5

60.6 71.1 6 67.9 78.4

Adjustsd points diameter • 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch Adjusted points diameter _< 24" no point closer than 0.6 inch Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 4 points per port if the 8 2 diameters downstream

and upstream criteria is meL

INCHES

11Method 5/26A

Sam

ling

Train

Filter Exit Temperature (>248 F)

Sensors ,iiiiiiiiiiiiiil

•£•'• I

aping03•).IN •aOt

npmg• #4 •250 liea (3 Impinger Exit Temperature (<68 F)

¢

Ice Bath

Exhaust OOOOO0 Temp. and Flow Controllers
Temperature ][

Manometer Dry Gas Meterjenkins brick

& tile POST OFFICE BOX 91 MONTGOMERY,

ALABAMA

36101 PHONE: (334) 834-2210 FAX-" (334) 241-0787 1-800-USE-BRICK (834-2745)
Brian Sims vice President Manufacturing January 20, 2011 Mr. Jeffrey Telander Office of Air Quality Planning

and Standards United States Environmental

Protection

Agency Research Triangle

Park, NC 27711 Re: Requirement

to provide

information

according

to Title 42 of the United States Code, Chapter 85, S ubchapter

I, Part A, section 7414 (42 U.S.C. 7414) Dear Mr. Telander: Enclosed with this letter are the complete

stack test reports for our facilities

in Montgomery and Brompton,

Alabama.

After our conversation

yesterday,

! reviewed these reports and found a mistake

in the June 7, 2007, report for the Montgomery

Plant and in the February

21, 2008, report for the Jordan Plant. I made notes within the reports explaining these errors. In both cases, the errors were in the data regarding

the plant production rates during these tests. For the Montgomery

Plant, both kilns exhaust

into one DIFF. During the tests, both kilns were running

at full speed (29 cars per day, each; total of 58 cars/day);

however,

the production

rate was calculated

as if only one kiln was operating. For the Jordan Plant test dated 2/21/08,

the tons per hour of fired brick was miscalculated because

the "green" weight of the brick was reported

to the testing contractor instead of the fired brick weight.

For this report, I have included

a copy of our Manufacturing Daily Operating

Report for the month of February

2008, which shows the average daily fired weight of the brick on each day of the month.

Explanatory

notations have been made on the "Emissions

Summary"

page at the beginning

of these reports and corrected sheets have been included. Thank you again for your help during these difficult

times. Please call me on my cell phone (334-657-2351)

if there is anything

else I can do to help you in this project.
Sin • •ely

----__

• V.P.-ManufacturingENTEC Services
Poflution Control System Evaluation

and Source Emissions

Tasting Jenkins Brick Montgomery, Alabama

MACT Testing Main Stack

DIFF

Baghouse

June 5, 2007 Entec Project

No.: 27154

16-D Commerce

Avenue

Hueytown,

Alabama

35023 Phone: (205) 491-6676

Fax (205) 491-6614 www.entecservices.comEntec Services, Inc. 16 D Commerce

Avenue Hueytown, Alabama

35023 Telephone: (205) 491-8676 Fax: (205) 491-6614 Results of the June 5, 2007 MACT Testing

on the Main Stack

DIFF Baghouse

Located

in Montgomery, Alabama ADEM Permit

No. 209-0011-X006
Submitted to: Jenkins Brick

Company 1228 N McDonough Montgomery, Alabama

36104 Attention: Mr. Cort Peavy
Entec Project

No. 27154 Completed By:
(-J/Art Otero Proiect Leader Report Submitted:

June 15, 2007 Reviewed By:

Tom Lotz Technical Services

Manager hereby certify to the best of my knowledge

all field sampling

and laboratory

analysis

performed for this report is authentic

and accurate.

It has been checked

for completeness

and accuracy.Jenkins Brick Table of Contents Section Pa_qe No. Executive Summary Emissions Summary Detailed Test Results Samplin_(3 Procedures Location of Test Ports Method 26A Sampling

Train Field Data Sheets

Main Stack Test Run No. 1 Test Run No. 2 Test Run No, 3 Control Room Data Test Protocol Quality Control

I Quality

Assurance

Procedures Field QA I QC Checklist Meter Orifice and Temperature

Check Sheet Fyrite Standardization

Sheet Method 5126A Sample

Recovery

Sheet Laboratory Analysis Audit Sample

Results Equipment Calibrations Nomenclature and Test Calculations 12371112131417202325283334363940444859Executive Summat3f Entec Services,

Inc was retained

by Jenkins

Brick Company

to perform

additional MACT testing

l•or particulate

matter,

hydrogen

chloride

and hydrogen

fluoride

on the DiFF Baghouse

Stack at the facility located

in Montgomery,

Alabama.

Mr. Art Otero, and Mr. Trent iVIcMahan

of Entec Services,

inc. conducted

the testing on June 5, 2007. Representing the Alabama

Department

of Environmental

iVlanagement

(ADEM)

was Mr. Bryan Brumfield

and Mr• Patrick

Byrd. Mr Cort Peavy of Jenkins

Brick help coordinate the testing with operations.
ADEM provided

audit samples

that were supplied

to the lab and have been included

in the laboratory

analysis

section.

All audit samples

were verified

by ADEM

/ EPA as passing.
No difficulties

were encountered

in the field or in the laboratory

analysis

of the samples by Entec Services:

Inc. The particulate

and HCI / HF emissions

test summary

on the following page gives a detailed

summary

of each test run compared

to the maximum emission limits set forth by the Alabama

Department

of Environmental

Management. (ADEM). Test results

indicate

the particulate

emissions

are below

the limits set forth by the ADEM Permit

No. 209-0011-X006.• ¢ O0 ¢ 00000Detailed Test

ResultsSOURCE

OWNER:
PLANT LOCATION: SOURCE(S) NAME(S): SOURCE(S) CONDITION:

Entec

Services, Inc. SOURCE OVERVIEW
Jenkins Brick Montgomery, AL
DIFF Baghouse

Stack MACT testing with Lime Rate at 60 Lb/Hr SOURCE(S) SHAPE: PROBE WASH CHEMICAL: SOURCE PERMIT NUMBER: TEST PERFORMED: ADDITIONAL TEST REQUIREMENTS: ( "•EFERENCE•

METHOD

TESTS:

PROJECT MANAGER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST

PROJECT

LEADER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST

ASSISTANT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: RULING AGENCY RULING AGENCY

REPRESENTATIVE: co.ooc o: ENTEC PROJECT

NUMBER: Circular Acetone 209-0011-X006 Particulate

and HCI/HF Testing BRICK MACT Subpart JJJJJ Sample Location EPA Method

1 Volumetric Flow

EPA Method

2 Molecular Weight

EPA Method

3 Moisture Content

EPA Method

4 Particulate EPA Method

5 HCI and HF

EPA Method

26A Mr, Lynn Beane Mr. Art Otero Mr. Trent McMahan Mr. Cort Peavy Alabama Department

of Environmental

Management Mr, Bryan Brumfield

and Mr. Patrick Byrd 06/05/07 27154ENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 INPUT TEST DATA Client: Source: Jenkins Brick DIFF Baghouse

Stack Job No.:

27154 Data Input By:

Art Otero Field Data Run Number Test Date Time Test Run Began Ended Sampling Time Stack Area Barometric Pressure =Stack Static Pressure Pitot Tube Correction

factor Meter Correction

Factor •Meter Delta H @ Nozzle Diameter :Vleter Volume Meter Temperature Avg. Orifice Delta H Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture) Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) Oxygen Concentration,

dry basis Carbon Dioxide Concentration,

dry basis Avg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P Stack Temperature Total Hydrogen

Chloride collected,

mg Total Hydrogen

Fluoride collected,

mg Total particulate

collected Symbol

PbatP•Cp
Y

OnVmtrn&H
Ws•O•CO2 (sqrt AP)avg

HCLHF

Units

Military Time minutes Ft in. Hg in. H20

in. Hz0 inches dcfF in. H•0 grams grams

(in. H20)
Fmgmgmg Test Data
06/05/07 06/05/07

06/05/07 0800-0904 0950-1054

1132-1237 6O 27.494 29.85 -0.25 0.84 1.004 1.800 0.300 39.861 85.9 1.29 76.9 10.4 17.03.0 0.523 402.6 1.80.541.6 6O 27.494 29.85 -0.29 0.84 1.004 1.800 0.300 40.086 93.6 1.30 76.2 10.0 16.53.0 0.526 403.71.80.372.0

6O 27.494 29.85 -0.27 0.84 1.004 1.800 0.300 40.214 100.4 1.27 79.49.817.0

AVERAGE

6O
29.85 -0.27 0.84 1.004 1.800 0.300 40.054 93.3 1.29 77.5 10.1 16.8 4.0 3.3 0.518 0.522 412.3 406.2

1.2 1.6ENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 CALCULATED TEST DATA
Client: Jenkins Brick Source: DIFF Ba•lhouse Stack Description

Formulas Run Number Test Date Time Began-Ended 1. Stack Pressure Pb.• Pal 13.6 2. Meter Pressure P•at •.H 13.6 3. Standard Meter Volume 17.64" Y* (VmlTm)* (P•a, +/'H 113.6 4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed =0.04706*W•m 4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel =0.04715=w• 5. Moisture Fraction 9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis 10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis 1. Average Stack Gas Velocity 12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions

=(V•l• Vw=•,td})l(V•(=•dl

Vw•{=di 0.32=(O2)+ 0.44"(CO•)+0.28"(100-(O=)-(CO•)) M•*(1-B.s)+I

8.0*(Bws)

13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions

85.49*Cp*(sqrt ,•P},v•*SQRT((Ts)

(Ps=Mw)) 60*vs*A,

14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions 14b, Hydrogen Chloride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. =(0.01543*HCL•q)IQ=¢ 14b. Hydrogen Fluoride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. 15. Particulate concentration @ Standard Conditions 15b. Hydrogen Chloride emissions, Ibs per hour =(0.01543*HFm•)IQst< =0,01543*mnNmlstdl =(6017000)'HCLQ•d*Q=z• =(6017000)*HFQstd*Q=t

S•/mbol

B•

115b, Hydrogen Fluoride emissions, Ibs per hour HF -Ibslhr 21. Particulate emissions (S0/7000)*c,'Q,,•

PaR 22. Volume collected through nozzle =T=/Ps*[0.002669*Vt=+

V•*Y*Pm/T•

V. 23. Particulate concentration,

@ actual conditions =0.01543"m.N. 24. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent 100"Vn (60*v•'A.*0)

Post Meter Orifice Cal. (EMC ALT-009 Yqa) % Difference. (Calibration must be within 5% of original Y-factor) Units

Military Time in. Hg in. Hg dscf scfscf fraction g/g-mole g/g-mole ffJs acfm scfm dscfm grldscf grldscf gtldscf Ibs/hr Ibslhr Ib/hr acf gr/acf %

Job No.:

27154 Data input By: Art Otero Calculated Data
06/05/07 06/05/07

0•05•7

AVERAGE

0800-0904 0950-1054

1132-1237 29.83 29.83

29.83

29.83 29.94 29.95

29.94

29.94 38,724 38.404

38.054

38.394 3.619 3,586

3.737

3,647 0.490 0.472

0.462

0.475 0.0959 0.0956

0.0994

0.0970 29.160 29.140

29.320

29.207 28.089 28.076

28.195

28.120 38.14 38.34

37.89

38.121 62,912 63,247

62,500

62,886 38,380 38,532

37,704

38,206 34,698 34,850

33,958

34,602 0.001 0.001

0,001

0.001 0.000 0.000

0.000

0,000 0.0006 0.0008

0.0005

0.0006 0.21 0.22

0.25

0.23 0.06 0.04

0.01

0.04 0.19 0.24

0.15

0.19 70,212 69.698

70.041

69.984 0.0004 0.0004

0.0003

0.0004 104.18 104.62 102.87

103.89
0.9694 0.9761

0.9642

0.9699 3.40%Sampling ProceduresProcedures The

emission

rates were determined

using EPA Methods

1 5, and 26A of CFR Title 40, Part 60, Appendix

A. The calibration

and quality

assurance

procedures

of EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix

A for all methods,

and the "Quality

Assurance

Handbook

for Air Pollution

Measurement

System"

Volume

III Stationary

Source-Specific

Methods
were followed

throughout

the duration

of the field and laboratory

testing. The most current

version

for each method

(as described

in the Federal

Register)

was used. Stack Gas Volumetric

Flow Methods

1 and 2 The velocity

of the gas stream

was determined

according

to EPA Reference

Method

1 and 2 by reading

the instantaneous

velocity

head with an inclined

manometer

at each sampling point with a calibrated

S-type

pitot tube attached

adjacent

to the sample nozzle. The stack pressure

was measured

with the static side of an S-type pitot tube. A calibrated

pyrometer

was used to measure

stack temperature

at each sampling

point. The stack was tested for cyclonic

flow according

to EPA Reference

Method

1. Stack Gas Molecular

Weight

Method

3 The carbon

dioxide

and oxygen

concentrations

were determined

using EPA Reference Method 3 (Fyrite Method).

A sample

of the flue gas was extracted

from the gas stream during each test. These

samples

were analyzed

with a Fyrite gas analyzer.

The molecular weight

of the gas was calculated

using the moisture,

oxygen

and carbon dioxide content

and the measured

stack gas temperature. Moisture Content

Method

4 The moisture

content

used for calculating

the gas stream

flow rate was determined

by measuring the amount

of condensed

moisture

in the glass impingers

and silica gel impinger in the sampling

train as described

in EPA Reference

Method

4 at the completion of each test. Hydrogen Chloride

/ Hydrogen

Fluoride

with Particulate

Method

5/26A Preliminary data was used to determine

stack temperature,

pressure,

and range of velocity heads, moisture

content

and stack gas dry molecular

weight prior to sampling.The

meter box was leak checked

from the pump to the orifice.

Initial and final leak checks of the sampling

system

and pitot lines were performed

as outlined

in Method

5 and were recorded

on the data sheets.

The nozzle

(glass or Teflon with an angle of taper of 30 degrees

and of button hook design)

was calibrated

before and after the test using a micrometer

and was also recorded

on the data sheets. The sampling

probe was placed at each sampling

point to provide

a total sampling

time of at least 60 minutes

and a volume

of at least 31.8 cubic feet. The gases were drawn fhrn•Jnh • f•_flnn nnzTl•_

•ff•P.h•.rt

fn • h•.•f•.rt

g!ass lind.r1 nrnh•.

The. g•.•..• fh•n proceeded through

borosilicate

glass filter holder,

with a Teflon frit filter support

through
a tarred Teflon filter to remove

particulate

matter.

The exit of the filter will bemaintained at a temperature

of greater

than 248 0 F. These temperatures

were recorded

at each point on the data sheets. The gases were then scrubbed

through

a series of four impingers

(optional

impinger

not included) to capture

hydrogen

halides

and halogens

and moisture.

The first and second impingers

contained

approximately

100 ml of a 0.1N H2SO4 solution

and the third and fourth impingers

contained

approximately

100 ml of a 0.1 N NaOH solution. The fifth impinger

contained

approximately

250 grams of pre-weighed

silica gel to
remove any remaining

moisture.

The gases passed

through

the impinger

series in an ice bath to maintain

a maximum

exit temperature

of 68 0 F. This temperature

was recorded on the data sheets.

The clean and cool gases then entered

the meter box where the gas flow and temperature

were measured. After the completion

of the test leak rate determinations

were made. Then the sampling train and the probe nozzle assembly

was transferred

to the cleanup

area making

sure no particulate

was lost. The cleanup

data was recorded. Particulate catches

were placed

in sealed

petri dishes.

Each acetone

rinse from the nozzle, probe, and filter holder was combined

and placed in a sealed container.

For the group of tests an acetone

blank of approximately

200 milliliters

was placed

in a sealed container. The first and second

impinger

contents

were weighed

and then transferred to its recovery

container

with the rinsing from the connecting

glassware

were added to this container.

The third and fourth contents

were weighed

and the contents

discarded.The silica gel from the fifth impinger

was weighed.

A blank of the sulfuric

acid solution and acetone

was taken. These containers

were clearly marked

and transported

to the laboratory for analysis.

The laboratory

we used was Stillbrook

Analytical.

10Entec Services,

Inc 16 D Commerce

Ave. Hueytown,

AL 35023

Client: Jenkins Brick Job No. 27154 Source: DIFF Baghouse

Stack Input By: Art Otero Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate

(P): Stack Diameter, inches:

71 Stack Height, feet:

60

P

Port Type

Flange

Port Diameter

6.0" Stack Area, Ft2: 27.494 Number of Ports: 2 Stack Properties:

Inches

Duct Diameters Upstream Disturbance:

156.0 Downstream Disturbance:

504.0

2.20 7.10

Length of Port, inches: Total Number of Traverse Points: Number of Points per diameter:

10.50 126 71.0 INCHES

156.0

NCHES

504.0 INCHES

Point No.

Inside Stack

Outside Nipple Inches Inches 3.1 13.6 2 10.4 20.9 3 21.0 31.5 4 50.0 60.5 5 60.6 71.1 6 67.9 78.4

Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch Adjusted points diameter < 24" no point closer than 0.5 inch Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 4 points per port if the 81 2 diameters downstream

and upstream criteria is met.Method 5/26A

Sampling Train

Filter Exit Temperature (>2480 F)

0.1N

0.1N

-25o•

Impinger Exit Temperature

Ice Bath

Exhaust Temp. and Flow Controllers • Temperature •) [Manometer Dry Gas MeterDIFF Baghouse Stack Field Data

SheetsDIFF Baghouse Stack Test Run

No.

1

14ENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023
Client: Jenkins Brick Test Date:

615/2007 Source: DIFF Baghouse

Stack Run Number:

1

PARTICULATE W/HYDROGEN

CHLORIDE

HYDROGEN

FLOURIDE

FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD

5/26A

Traverse Point 1-1

uel•a P' 0.32

Sq. Rt. Delta P 0.5657

Uelta H 1.50

Stack: Temp. ('F) 400 1-2 0.34

0.5831

1.59

401 1-3 0.30

0.5477

1.40

401 0.5292 0.28 1-41-5 1.31 1.17 0,25 0.5000 1-6 0.18

0.4243

0.84 2-1 0.26

0.5099

1.22 0.5292 0.5568 0.5385 0.5385 0.28 0.31 0.29 1.31 2-22-32-42-5 1.45 1.36 1.36 0,29 Meter Temp. (°F) 808183

K-Factor 402

83 400 84 391 86 404 87 407409409407 8889899O 2-6 0.21

0.4583

0.98

400

91

1.29 0.5234 4.68 0.28 402.6

85.9 15•EEE 0

oio18DIFF Baghouse Stack Test Run

No.

2

17ENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023
Client: Jenkins Brick Test Date:

6/5/2007 Source: DIFF Baghouse

Stack Run Number:

2

PARTICULATE W/HYDROGEN

CHLORIDE

HYDROGEN

FLOURIDE

FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD

5126A

Traverse Point 1-11-21-31-41-51-6

Deita P 0.24 0.27 0.26 0.30 0.25 0,25

0.4899 0.5196 0.5099 0.5477 0.5000 0.5000 2-1 0.31

0.5568 2-2 0.36

0.6000 0.32 0.28 0,25 0.24

0.28 2-32-42-52-6

K-Factor 4,70 0.5657 0.5292 O.5O0O 0.4899

0.5257

Delta H 1.13 1.27 1.22 1.41 1.18 1.18 1.46 1.69 1.50 1.32 1.18 1.13

1.30

:Stacl( Temp. ('F) 4O5404403402402394 Meter Temp. (°F) 898990919393 407 94 407 95 407 96 406404403

403.7 979898

93.6OEEEDIFF Baghouse Stack Test Run

No.

3

20ENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023
Client: Jenkins Brick Test Date:

615/2007 Source: DIFF Baghouse

Stack Run Number:

3

PARTICULATE Wl HYDROGEN

CHLORIDE

HYDROGEN

FLOURIDE

FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD

5/26A

1-11-2 0.36 0.34

K-Factor

0.6000 0.5831 1-3 0.34

0.5831 1-4 0.30

0.5477 1-5 0,22 1-6 0.20 2-1 0.23 2-2 0.27 2-3 0.25 2-4 0.25 Delia H

Stack Temp.('F) 1.69 407 1.60 1.60 1.41 0.4690 1.03 0.4472 0.94 0.4796 1.08

4084O8

•ieter Temp. (:F) 969698 409 99 408 100 416 100 409 102 0.5196 1.27

415

102 0.5000 1.18

419

102 1.18 0.5000 417

103 2-5 0.28

0.5292

1.32

417

103 2-6 0.21

0.4583

0.99

414

104

412.3 0.5181 4.70 0.27 1.27 100.4
218SS•

:•EEEControl Room

DataJENKINS BRICK MONTGOMERY

PLANT PRODUCTION

DATA (FOR METHOD

26fTA(

car/24 hour brick per car fired brick wt. (Ib) wt per car (Ib): wt per 24 hr (Ib):

29 5712 3.41 19477.92 467470.1 ton brick per car: ton brick per 24 hr:

9.73896 233.735

240

0

0EN TEC

Services
Pollution Control System Evaluation

and Source Emissions

Testing May 21,2007 Ms. Wendy

Hall Alabama Department

of Environmental

Management PO Box 301463 Montgomery, AL 36130-1483 Subject: Test Protocol

for Jenkins

Brick

Montgomery

Facility DIFF Stack

Part 63, Subpart

JJJJJ (Methods

1-5, w126A -PM, HCI & HF) Montgomery, AL Dear Ms. Roberts, This letter is to inform you of our intent to begin additional

MACT testing

for Particulate Matter, Hydrogen

Chloride

and Hydrogen

Fluoride

Testing

on the DIFF Baghouse Stacks at the Jenkins

Brick facility located

in Montgomery,

Alabama.

Testing

will be coordinated with Mr. Cort Peavy

Environmental

Manager

of Jenkins

Brick or other personnel as required.

A test date has been scheduled

for June 5, 2007. Testing

will be conducted

over a one (1) day period.

This additional

testing is being conducted

per the request

of Mr. Cort Peavy to establish

a lower lime injection

rate. (1) Entec's

test team will arrive at Jenkins

Brick on June 5 th, 2007 at approximately 7:00-7:30

am to begin leak checks

and perform

initial QA/QC checks as required.

We expect to begin the testing at approximately

8:00am. Mr. Art Otero or Mr. Tim Draheim

will be the on site project

manager

with additional personnel

to be determined

based on availability

of personnel during the scheduled

time frame.

16-D Commerce

Avenue

Hueytown,

Alabama

35023 Phone: (205) 491-6676 www. entecservices,

corn 26 Fax (205) 491-6614(2) Entec will perform

three (3) one hour test runs for Particulate

Matter,

Hydrogen Chloride (HCI) and Hydrogen

Fluoride

(HF) on the DIFF Baghouse

stack.

The emissions testing and reporting

will be performed

in accordance

with EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix

"A" and Part 63 Subpart

J J J J J, EPA Test methods

1-5 w/ 26A. All testing

and laboratory

QA / QC requirements

will be followed

as described. (3) Jenkins

Brick personnel

will collect all required

control

room and operational

data
as required

under the operating

permit for final reporting

requirements.

(Feed Rate Total Tons Fired Brick)
If you should have any questions,

please call Entec at 205-491-6676.

Our Jenkins

plant contact is Mr. Cort Peavy who can be reached

at 334-834-2210. Sincerely, Entec Services,

Inc.

D. Lynn Beane Operations Manager

16-D Commerce

Avenue

Hueytown,

Alabama

35023 Phone: (205) 491-6676

Fax (205) 491-6614 www.entecservices.com

27Quality Assurance / Quality

Control, Procedures

28QA

/ QC Procedures Specific quality assurance

/ quality control procedures

were adhered

to during this test project to provide

valid and scientifically

defensible

data. For any environmental

field and laboratory

measurement,

a degree

of uncertainty

exists in the data due to inherent limitations of the measurement

systems

employed.

The objective

of a QA/QC

program is to produce

data of known

precision,

accuracy,

representation,

completeness

and comparability. The objective

in this test project

was to determine

compliance

with applicable air permit

requirements.

The final data user in this project

will be the Alabama Department

of Environmental

Management. The following

section

details

all QC procedures

followed

during the manual

sampling activities. Velocity / Volumetric

Flow Rate Methods

1 and 2 Volumetric flow rates were determined

during each isokinetic

test run. QC steps were adhered

to during these tests: The following Reported duct dimensions

were checked

by physical

measurements

to determine cross-sectional duct area. Pitot tube coefficients

were determined

based on physical

measurement

techniques
as delineated

in Method

2 The Type-S

pitot tube was visually

inspected

before and after sampling. The pitot tube was installed

on the sampling

probe with the proper orientation

and spacing from the sampling

nozzle. Before each series of tests, thermocouple

readings

for the silica gel impinger

exit temperature was checked

against

an N.I.S.T.

traceable

thermometer. The oil manometer

was leveled

and zeroed before each test run. Both legs of the pitot tube were leak-checked

before and after sampling. Proper orientation

of the pitot tube was maintained

while making

measurements. The roll and pitch axis of the pitot tube was maintained

at 90 o to the flow. An average

velocity

pressure

reading

was recorded

at each point instead

of recording extreme

high or low values. The pitot/manometer

umbilical

lines were inspected

before and after sampling

for moisture condensate.

Lines were cleared

if moisture

was found.
29Molecular Weiqht

Determination-Fyrite Analysis

Method

3 The carbon dioxide

and oxygen

concentrations

were determined

using EPA Reference Method 3. A sample

of the flue gas was extracted

from the gas stream during each test. The samples

were analyzed

with a Fyrite gas analyzer.

The following

QC steps were adhered to during these tests: The sampling

train was leak checked

before and after each samples

was taken. The samples

were run in triplicate

for accuracy. Standardization was performed

to audit the reagents

and the operators

technique. A knnwn mi•(tzJr•,

nf R• •nrl rl• w•_• •n•lvT•d

•nrl r•n•::if•rl

•Mifh .o, values +/- 0.$ percent

of the known value. Two NIST traceable

gas cylinders

were run against

the instrument

to audit the accuracy of the analyzer

and the analyzer

operator

technique.

One cylinder contained 2 to 4 percent

02 and 14 to 18 percent

CO2. The second

cylinder contained 2 to 4 percent

CO2 and about 15 percent

02. Moisture Determination

Method

4 Stack gas moisture

content

(Bws) was determined

by dividing

the mass of moisture collected by the impingers

or stainless

steel condenser

and silica gel impinger

by the standardized volume

of gas sampled.

The following

QC steps were adhered

to during these tests: The indicating

silica gel was fresh for the first run and periodically

inspected

and replaced during runs, if needed. The analytical

balance

was placed in a clean, motionless

environment

for weighing. The balance

was leveled

and zeroed

if necessary

before each weighing. Preliminary silica gel impinger

tare weights

and post-run

weights

were weighed

to the nearest

0.1 g. Before each series of tests, thermocouple

readings

for the silica gel impinger

exit temperature were checked

against

an N.I.S.T.

traceable

thermometer. The silica gel impinger

gas temperature

was maintained

below 68°F and recorded at every traverse

point. Each impinger

was wiped of surface

moisture

before post-run

weighing. The volume

of liquid captured

was measured

using a graduated

cylinder

with 1- milliliter increments.

30Particulate Matter

HCI HF Sampling

Method

5 / 26A Accurate particulate

concentrations

are dependent

on the mass of particulate

matter collected by the train and recovered

after sampling,

and the standardized

gas sample volume measured°

QC procedures

that were followed

so that representative

particulate data was collected

by the sampling

system were: Only clean, well-maintained

sampling

equipment

was used. Sampling ports were inspected

and cleaned

prior to sampling. All equipment

was calibrated

according

to EPA standards.

The dry gas meter was fully calibrated

within the past 12 months

using a set of calibrated

orifices. The sampling

train components

exposed

to sample

gas were constructed

of glass
or Teflon. Accurate barometric

pressure

was recorded

at least once per day. The dry gas meter thermocouples

were compared

to ambient

temperature

prior to the test run as a check on operation. Pretest and post-test

leak-checks

were completed

(must be tess than 0.02 cfm or 4% of the average

sampling

rate). Before each series of tests, thermocouple

readings

for meter temperature,

filter hotbox, probe,

and filter exit temperatures

were checked

against

an N.I.S.T. traceable thermometer. Readings of the dry gas meter, meter orifice pressure

(L•H), meter temperatures, filter hotbox

temperatures,

probe temperatures,

and filter exit temperatures

were taken at every traverse

point. Probe and filter temperatures

were monitored

and maintained

at 248 + 25 0 F. The filter exit temperature

was maintained

at 248 + 25 0 F. The gas meter was read to the thousandth

of a cubic foot for the initial and final readings. The sampling

velocity

through

the nozzle was maintained

within 10% of the stack gas velocity

(isokinetic

sampling

rate at 100+10%). All nozzle/probe

recovery

items were pre-cleaned

and kept in containers

when not being used. Filter recovery

used tweezers

to handle

the filter, and was careful

to include

any filter fibers or pieces adhering

to the filter holder. Probe and nozzle recovery

included

wiping the outer surface

clean of dust before sample recovery.

Sample

recovery

consisted

of multiple

brushing

of the inner 31surface and twisting/rotating

the probe during

recovery

operations.

Transfer

of rinse acetone

to the sample

container

was accomplished

without

loss of liquid. Nozzle and probe brushes

were rinsed after brushing

inner surfaces. Liquid levels were marked

on sample

containers

and sealed

for shipment

to the laboratory. Acetone rinse blank was collected

for laboratory

analysis. Prior to the initial run a y-factor

check was performed

to ensure

that the meter was operating according

to the original

calibration

to within 3% of the original

y-factor. For the .post-test

calibration

the alternative

Method

5 .post-test

calibration procedures were used (Emission

Measurement

Center

Approved

Alternative Method ALT-009).

32ENTEC SERVICES, INC FIELD QA I QC CHECKLIST

PERMIT NUMBER: TEST METHODS

USED: i-•', ,0,/o ,•, CONTROL AGENCY: ENTEC PERSONNEL: MODIFICATIONS

TO METHOD:

/• ON S,TE REPRESENTATiVE: <v--- 2,,,/, •<•4•4 P•NT CONTACT:_

Was Calibration

Data on site? (Methods

1-5 / CEMS CAL Gas) Was Stack Diameter

I Area & Traverse

Points verified on field data sheets? N._ O

Was a 10-minute

Meter Orifice Check performed? Results of check •)•.• Were Temperatures

Verified

w/NIST Traceable

Thermometer? Was Preliminary

Traverse

wl Cyclonic

Flow verification

performed? Was previous

test data on source used to determine

K factor? Was Probe & Hot Box Temperatures

maintained

at 248 +/- 25 ° F? If not, explain

10.
11.12.13.14.!.,5. Was Acetone

Lot Numbe.••and

rec,o•n Signature (Test Team Leader)•S//L./,/.

_//•/(•,•/__

) / As required:

Control room data supplied

by: (_/'Or • Revision 2 December

2005 DLB 33 Was Filter Outlet Tempe. rature maintained

at 248 ÷/- 25 ° F?

_J(__
Was Orsat or Fyrite lea•k., checked

and standardization

perfo•r, med as required? Ambient 02 Reading(•O

'•" % Ambient

CO2 Reading

/(•2 % Sampling Bags used? If not, explain Was Tedlar Gas Were they leak-checked?

Y or.N Were Pitot Leak Checks performed

& recorded

on eaph field data sheet? Pitot inspected'•or

N Noted Visual Defects? Was Meter Leak Checks performed

& recorded

on each field date sheet? Was Nozzle Diameter

measured

& recorded

on each field data sheet? Nozzle inspected.•

or N Noted Visual Defects?

•o • Was Silica Gel Verified,

and recorded

for each test run? _.• Percentage Used during test- Run No.'s 1: /0• 2: ,/c3°•o 3: Field Data Sheet Date:

x

via on-site, email, or fax.ENTEC SERVICES, METER ORIFICE

AND

TEMPERATURE CHECKS

Oate: Meter Box Number: Original •,H@"

/. Location: Barometric

Press•e:

n•.• Original Y: Bi-Annual Calibration

Date: RUN METER

FOR EXACTLY

10.0 MINUTES Hg

Orifice Manometer Reading &H equal to

Dry Gas Volume,

ft • ,•H Q Dry Gas Meter Inlet Temperature, °F

Dry Gas Meter Outlet Temperature, °F

llllilill I-III¢II

llllll•ll
Average:

•,•

Average: Total Volume: Vm = Volume

of Dry Gas Meter TIn= Average

Temperature

of Dry Gas Meter in degrees

Rankin

(+460) PBarm = Barometric

Pressure Yc

Thermocouple Check

(all temperatures

are in = 10NmX

•/{ 0.0319

X TmlPa=m}

= 101( •7-$•

) x •/{ 0.0319

x ( •'•=7

)//OF/. 7,.• )}
Is Y= < +/- 3% of Original

Y ? V'•O•;

d,•/•

o F) NIST Traceable

ID Thermocouples I I.D.

Ambient

Temp.

Other • / Field Checks

Performed

By (Signature):

• Revision September

2005 DLB Reference

Temp.

Acceptance

Range
+1- 7.5 o +1- 5.4 o +/- 5.4 o +1- 2.0 o +1- 5.4 o +1- 2.0 o +1- 5.4 o

OK?

34•:,•O/l•2C 11025 AND ANSIINCSL ",.,,,• A,•"" ,.,•,,•.,•,.• .me : O e 't. N o, 4 3 7 "1 15 "1 "19 8 0 Tr•:eable@ C ,:,-'•''•" -, ._£ Instrurnerlt Iclentificatiorl: Model: 14-648-44 Standarcls/Equipment: Description emperal:ure

Probe Themfistor Module I'emporature CalibFalion Dath TC155 Ternperalute Probe hermislor Module Temperalure Calibration Bath TC'191 Certificato Information: Iechnician: 68 Test Condil.ions: S/N: 72083241

Procedure: CAL-03

ManulactLirer

Cor•trol Compal•y
SP.rial I',lun'fl•e,r

13ue Date

NIST lra{;eable

Re•arenc•-•

21.5"C ,19.0 %RIt t018 mBar Calibration Data: (New Instrument) LJni[(s• No•l•il•al

As Fouled In TOI "C N.A -'19

8il -fi07

A6713030 A27129 7,"10/07

100020769,1 93139 157 I/1,1/07

A6B06053 A 17118

8/23/Q7

A•J823089 A42238 CalDate:

1/11/07

CalDue:

'1/10/09

"C N.A

Nominal

AS Leri 0.000 .-ft.3 99.999 !)0.4 This Instrument

was calibrated using Instruments

Traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology,

Maintaining Accuracy:
Recalibration:

CONTROL

COMPANY

4455 Rex Road Friendswood,

TX 77546 USA Phone 281 482o17'14

Fax 281 482-9448

service@control3.com

www,control3.com
C•)nlrO• Con•)a•y ISO 9001 Ouahly CerliSed by (DNV) Oel Ne[ske Ver•laS, Cetl•flcale NO. CBRT-OISOS-AO-I

IOU.

35TEC SERVICES, INC. ORSAT STANDARDIZATION

Source: •"•+- Orsat / • Leak Check: Date of Test: •"-•'-O'• Date of Standardization:

,•'•- •'- • Orsat / •ID

#: •-&--/1 / Calibration Gases

V•IlUUI GasConcentration, (%) Tank1 02

C02
Carrier Gas Container Type Cylinder ID # Date of Expiration Tank 2

.002

Tank 1 1 Actual co2 //•.• O2 %.o

Net7.0

2 Actual /6o Net/{o.o"•.•

3 Actual Net //_,. o /•..o Average Net Volume

Known Value

Difference

Tank 1 2 Actual C02 3 .o 02 I•'.d

Net
/•.•

2 Actual /•o Net"•.0

3 Actual Net•.O Average Net Volume

Known Value

Difference

o. ooZ

t •IALYST

(Signature

I Date):

36Certificate of Analysis

Dace of Analysis: Gusto.reef N•rne G, ra.de of Product:

7;PRIMARY

STANDARD

Reference

Number: Part Number:

87-• 10858887-4 X03 N t8i P 15AC225 Cylinder Number CC214147

Component Requested Concentration Actual Concentration OXYGEN 3.000 %

2.993 % CARBON DIOXIDE

16.00 %

15.97 % NITROGEN Ba}anc-• Balance Notes: Relative Uncertainty

of A.. na_La•] .t•_ica•l Value: +f- t% of component

or +t- 0.02% of absolute, which ever is bower, Primary Standard

gas mixtures

are traceable

to N,[.S.T weights

andior N.I.S,T gas mixture refe fence materia]

s. Approval Si•r".,atu,"e

,,

Page 37Certificate of Analysis

Date of Analysis: Customer Name: Grade or Product:

7/14/2005
PRIMARY

STANDARD

Reference

N umber: Pa.rt N umbe,':

87-110858887-5 X0 •N';-SzP 1 ,,,•C 2•3 Cylinder Number CC214139

Component CARBON

D!OXIDE OXYGEN NITROGEN

Requested 3.000 % 15.00 % Balance

Actual Coi)centrati_on 3.002 % 14.97 % Balance Notes: Relative Uncertainty

of Analytical

Value: +# t% of component

or +# 0.02% of absolute, whichever is lower, Primary Standard

gas mixtures

are traceable

to N.I,S.T weights

and/or N.i.S.T gas mixture reference mat•,rials

--'"i •

38ENTEC SERVICES,

INC. METHOD 26A SAMPLE

RECOVERY

DATA SHEET Client / Location:

Jenkins

Brick / DIFF Baghouse

Stack Run No.:

1

Recovery

Date:

6/5/2007 Impingers 1

2

3

4

Sampling

Date(s):

6/5/2007__ Recovered By:

AO 6 Silical Gel Final Wt. Initial Wt. Net Weight

751.3 697.7 53.6

716.7 699.0 17.7

702.2 698.0 4.2

725.9 724.5 1.4 900.5

Description of Impinger

Contents:

Clear Desc ri,n_ rio r•ofP•rticulateonEilte•:•ite Silica Gel Color: Mixed Filter I.D. Number: TFE-11 Probe Rinse Container

No.:

R-1 Impinger Contents

Container

No.:

R-1 Run No.:

2

Recovery

Date: Impingers 1

2

3

Total Moisture

87.3

Grams Sealed: • N Percent Spent:

10 Filter Container

No.:

TFE-11 Liquid Level Marked

Sealed: Liquid Level Marked

Sealed: 6/5/2007 Recovered

By:

AO 4 5

6

Silical Gel Final Wt. Initial Wt. Net Weight

766.2 708.4 57.8

706.6 692.5 14.1

725.0 722.4 2.6

711.1 709.4 1.7 892.9

Description of Impinger

Contents: Description of Particulate

on Filter: Silica Gel Color: Filter I.D, Number: Probe Rinse Container

No.: Impinger Contents

Container

No.: Run No.:

3 Impingers 1

Clear Total Moisture

86.2

Grams White Mixed TFE-16 R-2Ro2 Sealed:

(• N Percent Spent:

10 % Filter Container

No.:

TFE-16 Liquid Level Marked

Sealed:

@ Liquid Level Marked / Sealed:

•) NN Recovery Date: 3

6/5/2007

Recovered

By:

AO 4 5

6

Silical Gel Final Wt. Initial Wt. Net Weight

775.2 712.8 62.4

597.1 584.3 12.8

627.7 624.4 3.3

709.6 708.7 0.9 938.3 928.5 Description of Impinger

Contents: Description of Particulate

on Filter: Silica Gel Color: Filter I.D. Number: Probe Rinse Container

No.: Impinger Contents

Container

No.: BLANKS: PrCpe Rinse: Signature: R•

Print Name:

Art Otero

Clear Total Moisture

89.2

Grams White Mixed TFE-17 R-3R-3 X Sealed:

(• N Percent Spent:

10 % Filter Container

No.:

TFE-17 Liquid Level Marked / Sealed: Liquid Level Marked

Sealed: Impinger: X

Filter:

NN

DATE TIME RECIEVED•
Date: Time (24hr):

• /•" /O7" Signature: /•" O• Print Name: 390

0

0ENTEC SERVICES, INC. Chain of Custody
Client
Contact: Phone No: Jenkins

Brick Lynn Beane 205-49!-6676 Project No.

27154 Lab Name: Lab Rrefrence

No. Entec .Job No=NoP.O. No. Stillbrook
27154 Samples Collected

by: Send Results to: Phone Fax Results To:

A. Otero Lynn Beane C/O: Entec Services

or Client 205-491-6676 Lab I.D.

Field I.D. R-1 Stack R-2 Stack R-3 Stack Audit Sample #1 Audit Sample #2 RELINQUISHED B/Y Signature: Print Name: Date 6/5/2007 6/5/2007 6/5/2007 6/5/2007 6/5/2007
DATE

/ TIME

Analysis

/ Method HCI/HF HCI/HF HCl/HF HCI / HF

Preservative Time

Signature: Print Name: 6/5/2007 /•"o • RECIEVED

BY

DATE / TIME

signature: Print Name:

RECIEVED

BY Signature: Print Name: Liquid Liquid Liquid Liquid Liquid

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS

COMMENTS:Laboratory Data Particulate Matter Gravimetdc

Analysis IClient:

Jenkins

Brick Analyst: •,ity/State: Montgomery,

AL

Bar. Press, In hg: !Source: DIFF Baghouse

Stack

Log Book Page No. Job No.:

27154 Lab Amb. Temp, °F: Balance Denver Instrument Lab Rel. Humidity,

%: Balance ID: P0090122 Calibration

(100000 mg)

Final Weight

Final Weight 2 T. Lotz 29.56 107047 100000.0 mg

T. Lotz 29.50 107442 100000.0 mg Filters Test No. 2 3 Filter ID No.

TFE-11 TFE-16 TFE-17 Initial Weight, mg

286.4 279.2 275.2 Average 286.4 279.2 275.2
Final Weight, mg

286.6 279.7 275.4 286.6 279.7 275.4 6/11/07 8:30 6/14/07 10:00

Average

Acetone

Wash Beaker ID No.

20 26 28 Volume of Acetone, ml

100 120 105 Initial Weight, mg

67,194.5 78,456.1 74,566.4 Average 67,194.5 78,456.1 74,566.4 6/11/07 8:30

Final Weight, mg

67,196.1 78,457.6 74,567.4 6/14/07 10:00

Final Weight, mg

67,195.9 78,457.8 74,567.6 Average 67,196.0 78,457.7 74,567.5 Acetone Blank Beaker ID No.

26 Volume of Acetone, ml

200 Initial Weight, mg

118,236.2 Average 118,236.2 6/11/07 8:30

Final Weight, mg

118,236.3 6/14/07 10:00

Final Weight, mg

118,236.3 Average 118,236.3 Total Weight of Particulate

Collected Weight of Particulate

Collected on Filter, mg Weight of Particulate

in Acetone Probe Wash, m 9 Weight of Acetone Blank, mg Density of Acetone Acetone Blank Residue Concentration,

mg/g Percent of Acetone Blank Weight Weight of Residue in Acetone Probe Wash, mg Total Weight of Particulate

Collected,

mg 0.15 1.50 0.10 0.7848 0.0006 0.45 1.60 0.10 0.7848 0.0006 0.0001% 0.051.6 0.0001% 0.062.0 0.20 1.10 0.10 0.7848 0.0006 0.0001% 0.051.2 Laboratory Note: In no case shall a blank residue greater than 0.01 mg/g or 0.001% of the weight of the blank be subtracted

from the sample weight

42ENTEC SERVICES, INC LABORATORY SAMPLES

QA / QC CHECKLIST

SOURCE TESTED:

L• •-"•"rc- ,•.r,•

RECOVERED BY: /C•. •)'/•(,//(-.

SAMPLING

DATE(S): METHOD(S): /- RECOVERY DATE:

• Description of Impinger

Contents: Test Run No.'s 1: C Impinger Contents

Container

Number: Test Run No.'s 1: Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container?

(•r N Liquid Level Marked?

(•or N Filter ID Number: Test Run No.'s 1" -•-•'-- Description of Particulate

on Filter: Test Run No.'s 1: Filter Container

Number: Test Run No.'s 1" •'FE-/(

2.:-J'•-•'- Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container?

(•)or N Probe Rinse Container

Number: Test Run No.'s 1 Z Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container?

(•or N Liquid Level Marked?

Y or N Probe Rinse Reagent:

/•c..•,• Lot Number. Laboratory Blanks: Probe Rinse:

"'/•

Impinger:

•"

Filter:

3: /7..- •'

Signature: •__•//!•/./

\ )

Date: D / .•"' O 7 "•rintName:/r'/ Ot,¢m Time(24hr>:

i•:O 0 Signature (Project Manager

or •

• Other: 9. Were samples

analyzed

by Entec Services,

Inc.? Y or(l• Ifnot,LaboratoryPerformingAnalysis: •i"//•(o¢•

,/• •f,•//V'Z/'.•

*** If using outside

laboratory

services

please fill out the following

chain of custody.

•:•.• -•,'•A/•,'• Signature: Print Name:

Revision 2 September

2005 TLj 43STILLBROOK Environmental

Testing Laboratory,

In• 305 Crawford Street Fairfield, AL 35064 (205) 788-1750 Lab Invoice

#: 24441

•lient: Mr. Lynn Beane Entec Services, Inc. 16D Commerce

Avenue Hueytown, AL 35023 Date: June 13, 2007
Project Name: Jenkins Brick Project Number:

27154 Project Location:

N/A P.O. Number:

N/A Sample Matrix: Liquid Sampled By: A. Otero Date Collected:

June 5 thru 6, 2007 Test Method:

"Methods

for Chemical

Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600/3-83.
Lab I.D.: 72135 R- 1 Stack Field LD.:
Total HCL 1.80 0.54320

LIQUID

ASSAYS 72]• --72137

:::::•/t•:•t•h:::::

::::::.•e•:•:::::: R-2 Stack R-3 Stack ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

1.80 0.37 Total HF 2.16 0.12 325 0.02 Total mg 0.02 Total mg 300.0 300.0

11-Jun-07 11-Jun-07 11-Jun-07

1215 1215 1215 Volume
Lab I.D.: 72140 0.1N H2SO4 yield I.D.: Blank
Total HCL BDL Total HE BDL

320

::::::::::::::::::::::::: .:.:-:.:-:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:

0.02 mg/L

300.0

11-Jun-07

1215

MD .........................•2272s:72727•:2•::2:•::•27• ::::::::::::::::::::::::::iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil 0.02mg/L

300.0

ll-Jun-07

1215

MD :::::::::::::::::::::::i:i Volume 100 .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:+:.:.:.:i

.:.:.:

:.1 mL

ll-Jun-07

1215

MD
Lab I.D.: 72138

72139 Audit Audit Fidd I.D.: Sample #1 Sample #2
rota• Chloride 287

377 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::

::::•:•a•::

:::::::::::::::::::::::::: 0.02 mg/L

300.0

ll-Jun-07

i:i:i:!:i:i:!:!:i:i:i:i:i

.:.:-:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:-:.:.: 1215 MD Detection limit, practical BDL=Bdow Detection

Limit Respectfully

submitted,

ADEM Laboratory

Certification

I.D.# 40710 44STILLBROOK Environmental

Testing Laboratory,

In• 305 Crawford S/feet Fairfield, AL 35064 (205) 788-1750 Lab Invoice

#: 24441 ( •iient:

Project Name: Project Location: Sample Matrix: Sampled By: Lab Analyst: Test Method:

Mr. Lynn Beane Entec Services, Inc. 16D Commerce

Avenue Hueytown, AL 35023 Date: June 13, 2007

Jenkins Brick Project Number:

27154 N/A P.O. Number:

N/A Liquid A. Otero Date Collected:

June 5 thru 6, 2007 MD Date/Time

Analyzed:

June 11, 2007 @ 1115 "Methods for Chemical

Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600/3-83.

Method 300.0. QUALITY CONTROL

DATA ERA Minerals

Reference

Control Lot #P128506 Chloride Assayed:

105 mg/L Flouride Assayed:

1.54 mg/L Range: 101-124 mg/L Range: 1.47-1.97 mg/L

President ADEM Laboratory

Certification

I.D.# 40710 45Method 26A Audit Material (CI- Spiked

Aqueous

Solution) REPORTING FORM"

To be completed

by laboratory Request Number/Sample

Number:

M26A-3336o01/M3105 Date Issued:

06/01/07
Audited: Company: Address: Reque'stor: Agency: Address: Attention of: Project Name:

Alabama

DEM 1400 Coleseum

Boulevard,

Mongomery,

AL 36110-2059 Michael Jordon Phone: 334-271-7900 Jenkins Brick Audit Results

(Results in mg/L) Anal•/te Chloride concentration Result

Revised 10/03Method 26A Audit Material (CI- Spiked

Aqueous

Solution) REPORTING FORM:

To be completed

by laboratory Request Number/Sample

Number:

M26A-3336-02/M3180 Date Issued:

06/01/07
Auditee: Company: Address: Attention of: Requestor: Agency: Address: Attention of: Project Name:

Alabama

DEM 1400 Coleseum

Boulevard,

Mongomery,

AL 36110-2059 Michael Jordon Phone: 334-271-7900 Jenkins Brick Audit Results(Results

in mg/L) Analyte Chloride concentration Result

Revised 10/03Equipment CalibrationsSAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL

EQUIPMENT

CALIBRATIONS All of the emission

testing equipment

used was calibrated

according

to the procedures outlined in the EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix

"A" and the Quality Assurance

Handbook for Air Pollution

Measurement

Systems,

Volume

III, EPA-600/4-77-027b. Type-S Pitot tube Calibrations The pitot tubes used for flow velocity

measurement

were checked

for dimensions

to verify a pitot coefficient

Cp of 0.84. Documentation

of the calibration

and calibration

^•'^^•" for •; ,.,, ,•,.,,,,

,.,,me, ,,:,,,.,, ,,=,, measurementsJsprovided. Sampling Nozzle

Calibration Sampling nozzles

were checked

visually

for nicks or damage

and for dimensional calibration prior to testing

by measuring

the nozzle diameter

in at least three planes using a Vernier

micrometer.

Measurements

must agree to within __.0.004-inches. Documentation is provided

on the individual

data sheets. Temperature Measuring

Device

Calibrations Each temperature

sensor

(stack gas, dry gas meter, and impinger

exit) and readout
was calibrated

at a minimum

of two points over the anticipated

range of use against

a NIST-traceable mercury-in-glass

thermometer.

All sensors/readouts

were calibrated prior to field sampling.

Stack gas thermocouples

must agree within 1.5% (expressed

in °R) of the reference

thermometer

through

out the entire calibration

range.

Dry gas meter thermocouples

must agree within _+5.4°F

and impinger

exit thermocouples

must agree within +2°F. Documentation

is provided. Dry Gas Meter Calibrations Dry gas meters

were fully calibrated

against

a set of calibrated

orifices.

After assembly and leak checking,

the console's

pump is allowed

to run for 15-minutes

to warm up the dry gas meter and pump. For a pre-test

full calibration,

data are collected

at five (5) orifice manometer

(L•H) settings

of approximately:

0.32, 0.67, 1.2, 2.0, and 3.9 inches of H20. Gas volumes

of at least 5 ft3 are used at all the orifice settings

and critical
vacuums were obtained

at all of the calibration

points.

The individual

gas meter correction factors

(y•) are calculated

for each orifice setting and averaged.

The method requires that each of the individual

correction

factors

fall within +2% of the averagecorrection factor, or the meter be cleaned,

adjusted

or repaired

and recalibrated.

The orifice pressure

differential

(/•H@) that equates

to 0.75 cfm of air at 68°F and 29.92 inches Hg is calculated

and along with the average

correction

factor (y) is marked

on the meter console. Analytical Balance

Calibration The analytical

balance

used to weigh particulate

filters and desiccated

rinse samples

is calibrated by comparing

its readings

against

NIST Class 1 weights,

with acceptable agreement within +0.5 mg. The field moisture

gain balance

was also compared

to NIST Class 1 weight,

with acceptable

agreement

within + lgm.

5{}-=•J• Z

51TYPE S PITOT

TUBE

INSPECTION

DATA

SHEET

LEVEL --7 BULLSEh'E

LEVEl.

• C.= ---•-•' 2 •: .z

Tube oo •••-•.•.= Oistonce Between Parameter Assembl•/Level? Holes Dama•led? Obstructed?

Value YesNo

Allowable

Ran£1e YesNoNo No •1 0

-10 < (zl < +10 ¢2 0

-10 < a2 < +10
0909O.9730 A Z A sin "( -5 < •1 < +5 -5 < •2 < +5

for 1/4" OD, 0.526 to 0.750 for 3/8" OD, 0.788 to 1.125 Z < 0.125" W A sin 0

0

W < 0.031" PA .487

for 1/4" OD, 0.263 to 0.375 for 3/8" OD, 0.394 to 0.563 PB .487

for 1/4" OD, 0.263 to 0.375 for 3/8" OD, 0.394 to 0.563 PA- PB

0

-0.063 to 0.063" DT .375

0.188 to 0.375" Thermocouple Cal.

80

Reference

temp. Thermocouple Cal.

80

Probe Thermocouple

Certification certify that the Type S pitot tube/probe

ID # ESP-87D

meets or exceeds

all specifications, criteria and/or applicable

design features

and is hereby assigned

a pitot tube calibration

factor Cp of 0.84
Certified and Calibrated

By: Date Certified: Lalan R. Kirby/ 4/23/2007 Annual Calibration 52ENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave.Hueytown,

Alabama 35023 Calibration Date:

11812007 Calibrated by:

Tom Lotz
Annual Thermocouple

Calibrations
Entec Services

Temperature

**Reference

Thermocouple

Difference

Within ID Number

Source

Temperature

Temperature

Degrees F

Tolerance TC-1 TC-2 TC-3 TC-4 TC-6 TC-7 TC-8 TC-11 TC-12 TC-13 TC-14 TC-15 TC-16 TC-17 TC-19 TC-20 TC-21 ambient

60

61 ambient 60

61 ambient 60

6161 ambient ambient 6O6O

61 ambient 60

61 ambient 60

60 ambient 60

61

ambient Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 Yes Yes ambient 60

61 Yes ambient 60

60

0

Yes 60 60

0

Yes

61 ambient 6O ambient 60

61 Yes ambient 60

61 Yes ambient 61

62 Yes ambient 61

61

0

Yes ambient 60

61 Yes Yes TC-22 ambient

60

61 Yes TC-23 ambient

60

61 Yes TC-24 ambient

61

61

0

Yes TCS ambient

60

60

0

Yes TCS 2

ambient

60

60

0

Yes TCS 3

ambient

60

60

0

Yes TCS 4

ambient

60

60

0

Yes TCS 5

ambient

61

61

0

Yes TCS 7

ambient

61

61

0

Yes TCS 8

ambient

61

61

0

Yes TCS 9

ambient

61

61

0

Yes TCS 10

ambient

61

61

0

Yes TCS 11

ambient

61

61

0

Yes TCS 12

ambient

61

61

0

Yes TCS 13

ambient

61

61

0

Yes TCS 14

ambient

61

61

0

Yes TCS 15

ambient

61

61

0

Yes TCS- 16

ambient

61

61

0

Yes Fluke Hand Held

ambient

61

60 Yes Fluke Hand Held 2

ambient

61

61

0

Yes Fluke Hand Held 3

ambient

61

61

0

Yes :Temperature tolerance within +1- 2 F of acceptable ranges for all thennocouples. i** Note: NIST Traceable Digital Thermometer

Serial Number 221243179 was used as reference temperature 53ENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Corn merce Ave.Hueytown,

Alabama 35023
Calibration Date:

1/2/2007 Calibrated by:

Tom Lotz
Annual Hot Box Thermocouple

Calibrations

Entec Services

Temperature

**Reference

Thermocouple

Difference

Within ID Number

Source

Temperature

Temperature

Degrees F

Tolerance HOTBOX ambient HOTBOX 2

ambient HOTBOX 3

ambient HOTBOX 4

ambient HOTBOX 5

ambient

66

67 Yes 66 67 Yes 66 66

0

Yes 66 65 Yes 66 67 Yes Yes HOTBOX 6

ambient

66

67 HOTBOX 7

ambient

66

66

0

Yes HOTBOX 8

ambient

66

66

0

Yes ambient HOTBOX 9 66

HOTBOX 12 HOTBOX 10

ambient

66 HOTBOX 11

ambient

6666 ambient ambient ambient HOTBOX 13 HOTBOX 14 6666

65 Yes

67.65 Yes 67 Yes Yes 6567 Yes Yee Temperature tolerance within +/- 20 F of acceptable ranges for all thermocouples. Note: NIST Traceah!e Oigital Thermometer

Serial Number 221243179 was used as reference temperature

54ENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave.Hueytown,

Alabama 35023
Calibration Date:

1/2/2007 Calibrated by:

Tom Lotz
Annual Gooseneck

Thermocouple

Calibrations

Entec Services

Temperature

**Reference

Thermocouple

Difference

Within iD N'.-'mbgr

So,-rce

T•=mper=f.r•=

T•.rnp•.ratur•

Degrees F

Tolerance 65 Yes GN-1 ambient GN-2 ambient GN-3 ambient GN-4 ambient GN-5 ambient GN-6 GN-7 GN-8

GN-12 ambient ambient ambient

646464646464

ambient 6464

65656564636363 YesYes Yes YesYes YesYes GN-9 ambient

64

65 Yes GN-10 ambient

64

64

0

Yes GN-11 ambient

64

65 Yes 64 65 Yes 6464646464 ambient ambient ambient ambient ambient 63 GN-13 GN-14 636465636465 ambient GN-15 (Mini HB) GN-16 (Mini HB) GN-17 GN-18 (Mini HB) GN-19 (Mini HB) GN-20 (Mini HB) GN-21 GN-22 (Mini HB)

ambient

6464 Yes Yes YesYesYesYes Yes ambient 64

65 Yes ambient 64

65 Yes ambient 64

65 Yes Temperature tolerance within +1- 2 F of acceptable ranges for all thermocouples. Note: NIST Traceable Digital Thermometer

Sedal Number 221243179 was used as reference temperature

55G F S CHEMICALS,

INC. Columbus, Ohio 43222 LOT ANALYSIS

ITEM: 828

ACETONE,

REAGENT

(ACS) LOT#:

P780589

TEST i. Assay

(GLC)

99.5% min 2. Residue

after

evaporation

0.001• 3. Solubility

in water

Pass Test 4. Titrable

acid

0.0003

meq/g 5. Titrable

base

0.0006

meq/g PASS/ FAIL PASS

PASS PASS PASS

NUMERICAL RESULT 99.99% <0.O01% passes <0.0003

meq/g <0.O005 meq/g 6. Aldehyde

(as HCHO)

0.0024 7. Color

(APHA)

I0 max PASS

<i0 8. Isopropanol

0.05% PAS5

<0.054 'ilMethanol 0.05% PASS

<0.054 i0. Substances

reducing

permanganate Pass Test

PASS

passes ii. •ater

0.5% PAS5

0.34% <0.002%

TRACEABLE TO N.I.S.T.

(Y/N)?

N
Comment:
Reported by: Silaja

Nacharaju

C/A Print

Date:

5/25/07 QC Supervisor:

Joan Plowman

Quality

Assured

to Retest

Point:
Not for direct

use in food,

cosmetic

or pharmaceuticals. Consult warranty

limitations

at www.gfschemlcals.com/terms.asp. For resale

by GFS authorized

distributors

only. 60 months from shipment

56METTLER TOLEDO Service Business Unit Laboratory 1900 Polaris Parkway Oolumbus, OH 43240 Tel.: 1-800-MEI-rLER

Balance

Test

Confirmation

Customer

Reference Weights

All weights used for metrologioal

testing are traceable to NIST. O•libration

due dale for OIML class E2 is city Weight Set No. NIST Traceability

No. Oalibrotion Date Traceability of Weights
Procedure

year, for OIML class F1 is 2 years from date of issue. All balances are metrologically

tested and this form was completed

in accordance

with MEFrLER TOLEDO Work Instruction

VW0111.

Remarks Date Service Technician VFO011 © by MEl-rLER TOLEDO 01/01 This is an original document, copies are not retained by METTLER TOLEDO Page of 5?Nomenclature and

Test

Calculations

59AnACFM BwsCsCaCpAHAPEAE/Btu FKpMnMdebarPgPrnPMR
e

stdQaastdTBws -['Vl c TVwstcl mmTstd

vmVnVmaVr.std vsVwcstd Vwsgstd WimpWsgY NOMENCLATURE
Cross-sectional area of stack, square feet Cross-sectional area of nozzle, square feet Actual cubic feet of gas per minute at stack conditions Proportion by volume of water vapor in gas stream Particulate concentration

in stack gas, gr/dscf Particulate concentration

in stack gas, gr/acf Pitot tube coefficient Pressure drop across orifice meter, inches water Velocity head of stack gas, inches water Cubic feet of dry gas c.(•rrected

to standard

conditions Excess Air Particulate Emission

Rate, pounds/mmBtu F-factor, 9640 dscf/MMBTU's

of heat input Constant (85.49) Total particulate

matter collected,

mg Molecular weight of stack gas; dry basis, Ib/Ib-mole Molecular weight of stack gas; wet basis, Ib/Ib-mole Percent of isokinetic

sampling Barometric pressure,

inches mercury Stack static pressure,

inches of water Barometric pressure

of dry gas meter, in. mercury Particulate mass rate, pounds/hour Absolute stack gas pressure,

inches mercury Barometric pressure,

standard

conditions,

29.92 inches Hg Volumetric flow rate, actual conditions,

ACF/min Volumetric flow rate, standard

conditions,

scf/min Volumetric flow rate, dry standard

conditions,

dscf/min Theoretical water vapor in the gas stream based on saturated

stack conditions,

proportion by volume (dimensionless) Theoretical volume of water collected

based on saturated

stack conditions,

ml Theoretical volume of water vapor in the gas sample based on saturated

stack conditions, corrected to standard

temperature

and pressure,

scf Absolute average dry gas meter temperature,

degree R (460) Absolute average stack gas temperature,

degree R (460) Absolute temperature

at standard

conditions,

528 R Total sampling

time, minutes Total volume collected

in impingers

and silica gel, gr Volume of gas sampled

through gas meter, cubic feet Volume collected

at stack conditions

through nozzle, ACF Stack gas volume sampled,

ACF Volume of gas sampled

through gas meter, cubic feet Average stack gas velocity, feet/sec Volume of water vapor in gas sampled

from impingers,

standard

cubic feet Volume of water vapor in gas sampled

from silica gel, standard

cubic feet Total volume collected

in impingers,

gr Total volume collected

in silica gel, gr Dry gas meter calibration

factorTEST CALCULATIONS EQUATIONS 1. P,=P,ar+(Pg/13.6) 2,•o4•5

+

• • /13.6)= 2. Pm=Pbar+(AH/13.6) Z•o•5

)+

•,Z•

/13.6)= 3. Vmstd=17.64*Vrn*Y*(Pm/Trn) 17.64"( 59o•

)*( •.•4r 4a. Vwc(std)=0.04706*Wimp 0.04706*(

7Go •

)= 5o 4b. Vwsg(std)

0.04715

Wsg

0.04715*(

•5o 4
5. Bw.=V.to/(Vms,o+Vws,ol 4.10

)// For saturated

sources

(No. 6 8 only): 6. TB,•s (106"37" {2827/(ts*365)}/Ps

10637"{2827/(

.364.8)}/(
V 7. TVwst,•

•std TBws/1- TBws) )*(

)/( 1 8. -I'V•c TVwst•/0.04707 /

10. Md= 0.44(%CO2)+0.32(%O2)+0.28((100-(%CO2+%O2)) 0.44(

'•

)+0.32(

|"• )+0.28(100-(

•:•

+

)=

11.
12.13.14.15. V•= 85.49 Cp* qzXP 4 [T, / (M,* P•)] Q•= V,* A, 60

(•%.l•q

)( &7.•9•

)(60)=

•• Q,=Q,*(528•,)*(PE29.92) •bq

)*(528/ ••

)*(•.•

/29.92)=

•• Q,t, Qa (1- B•,) (528•,)*(P,/29.92)

=( •

)(1- •5• )*(528/ •,• )*( •.•/29.92)

=• • C,=0.01543*(Mn/Vm,te) 0.01543*(

[.6

/ 3%R&•

)= •7 17. E/Btu= (CJ7000)*{(F•*20.9)/(20.9-%O2)} /7000)*{( )*20.9)/(20.9-( )} 18.
21. %EA= 100%* {(%OJ-0.5*(%CO)}

{0.264(%N2)

(%OJ+ 0.5*(%CO)} 100%*{( )-0.5(

)} / {0.264(

)-(

)+0.5( PMR= C,* Qs (60/7000)

o•b•,•"l

)*( •:l•"1J_ 1•

)*(60/7000) 22. Vn=T,/P,*{(0.002669)

V,•+ (Vm Y Pm)/Tm)} Ca=0.01543" (M,/Vn)

0.01543*( / i=V, lOO/(60*e*v,*&) "Tb.&,•,

)100/(60)(

63.