alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5699]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Reprogramming, Aging and Alzheimer's Disease.
    Date: March 27, 2012.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Elaine Lewis, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch, 
National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 2C212, MSC-
9205, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7707, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99fcf5f8f0f7fcf5fceef0ead9f7f0f8b7f7f0f1b7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0f6a636e66616a636a78667c4f61666e2161666721686079">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: March 1, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-5699 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.      SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: | November                14, 2007 |   | By: |  /s/              Chad C. Braun |
|-------|----------------------------------|--------|-----|--------------------------------------|
CHARMDAR M. TURNER, JR.

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 5327

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 17, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Gary L. Bergosh , Judge

.

Charmdar M. Turner, Jr. , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assist ant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

KELSEY, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, J J

. , CONCUR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JOHN ANTHONY VEGA, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 410 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 23rd day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
#### In re Estate of Hatt: Weisenbach et al., Appellants, *v.*Kistner, Admr., Appellee.

(Nos. 31014 and 31015

Decided May 21, 1947.)

*Mr. Robert Merhle,*for appellants.

*Mr. J. R.*Kistner, for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged, *sua sponte,*that these appeals as of right be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dsmissed.*

Wbygandt, C., J., . Turnee, Matthias, Hart and Sohngen, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0403]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Substantiation for Dietary Supplement Claims Made Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Denver Presley, II, Office of Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3793.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On August 30, 2011, the Agency submitted a proposed collection of information entitled ” Substantiation for Dietary Supplement Claims Made Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act” to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.                           ( print page 14022)                        OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0626. The approval expires on February 28, 2015. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*

Dated: March 2, 2012.

Leslie Kux,

Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-5632 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
#### In re the Marriage of Leah Catherine UTZINGER, n/k/a Leah Catherine Miley, Appellant, and Kenneth John Utzinger, Appellee.

No. 85CA0866.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

May 29, 1986.

Roberta S. Greengard, Denver, for appellant.

Bayer, Carey & McGee, P.C., James T. Bayer, Jennifer I. Holt, Denver, for appel-lee.

STERNBERG, Judge.

Leah Catherine Utzinger Miley (the mother) appeals an order changing custody of her daughter from her to Kenneth John Utzinger (the father). We affirm.

At the time of the dissolution of the marriage of the parties in 1981, the trial court approved a property settlement agreement which, *inter alia,*awarded custody of the then two-year-old daughter of the parties to the mother. When the mother later remarried, an order was entered permitting her to move from the state with the child.

When the child was five years old and was visiting with her father, an incident occurred leading the father to conclude that the child had been sexually abused. He reported this to the Department of Social Services which conducted an investigation that included an interview with the child. It was the conclusion of the social worker that the stepfather had engaged in sexual activity with the child. The motion for change of custody and the order here at issue followed.

*704The mother’s principal contention is that there was insufficient evidence to meet the requirements of § 14-10-131, C.R.S., for a change of custody. We do not agree.

Where, as here, there is evidence to support a trial court’s findings in ordering a change of custody, that court’s determination may not be disturbed on review. *In re Marriage of Trouth,*631 P.2d 1183 (Colo.App.1981).

Contrary to the mother’s argument, we are aware of nothing in the law requiring that the custodial parent must have in some way misbehaved to allow a court to change custody. It should be apparent that it is inappropriate for a child to continue living in a home where an adult who has abused her sexually also resides. The custodial parent’s innocence or guilt in such a situation is not dispositive of the best interests of the child.

It is true there are presently no outward manifestations of the child having been injured by the sexual contact. Nor is there a recommendation by a social worker to change custody. However, in light of

the evidence of sexual abuse in the record, we cannot say that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering the change of custody. *See Dockum v. Dockum,*34 Colo.App. 98, 522 P.2d 744 (1974). *See also In re Marriage of Agner,*659 P.2d 53 (Colo.App.1982); *In re Marriage of Trouth, supra.*

Finally, we address the mother’s assertion that the court erred in not considering certain letters which she attached to her motion for reconsideration and to her notice of appeal in this court. These documents were hearsay, and do not come under any exceptions making them admissible. *See*CRE 801 and CRE 802.

The order is affirmed.

PIERCE and METZGER, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13296]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5350]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Subcommittee Meeting of the Board of Advisors to the President, 
Naval Postgraduate School

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of The Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the 
following meeting of the aforementioned subcommittee will be held. 
(Parent Committee is: Board of Advisors to the Presidents of the Naval 
Postgraduate School and the Naval War College). This meeting will be 
open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 25, 2012, from 8 
a.m. to 4 p.m. and on Thursday, April 26, 2012, from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. 
Pacific Time Zone.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Naval Postgraduate School, 
Herrmann Hall, 1 University Circle, Didactic Room <greek-i>W410, 
Monterey, CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jaye Panza, Naval Postgraduate 
School, Monterey, CA 93943-5001, telephone number 831-656-2514.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to elicit the 
advice of the Board on the Naval Service's Postgraduate Education 
Program and the collaborative exchange and partnership between the 
Naval Post Graduate School (NPS) and the Air Force Institute of 
Technology. The board examines the effectiveness with which the NPS is 
accomplishing its mission. To this end, the board will inquire into the 
curricula; instruction; physical equipment; administration; state of 
morale of the student body, faculty, and staff; fiscal affairs; and any 
other matters relating to the operation of the NPS as the board 
considers pertinent. Individuals without a DoD government Common Access 
Card card require an escort at the meeting location. For access, 
information, or to send written comments regarding the NPS Board of 
Advisors contact Ms. Jaye Panza, Designated Federal Officer, Naval 
Postgraduate School, 1 University Circle, Monterey, CA 93943-5001 or by 
fax 831-656-3145 by April 6, 2012.

    Dated: February 28, 2012.
J.M. Beal
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate Generals Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal 
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-5350 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 19 

To amend the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 to promote 

energy security through the production of petroleum from oil sands, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself and Mr. CHAMBLISS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Independence and Security Act of 

2007 to promote energy security through the production 

of petroleum from oil sands, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Oil Sands Energy Se5 curity Act of 2010’’. 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 19 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROCUREMENT AND ACQUISITION OF ALTER2 NATIVE FUELS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 526 of the Energy Inde4 pendence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 17142) is 

5 repealed. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1112 of the 

7 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Author8 ization Act of 2008 (42 U.S.C. 17827) is repealed. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1881 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on bayderm bottom DLV– 

N. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on bayderm 

bottom DLV–N. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BAYDERM BOTTOM DLV–N. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.19 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 bayderm bottom DLV–N) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1881 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1710 

To prohibit recipients of TARP assistance from funding ACORN, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2009 

Mr. VITTER (for himself and Mr. SHELBY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit recipients of TARP assistance from funding 

ACORN, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS: ACORN. 

4 Title I of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act 

5 of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5211 et seq.) is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 137. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS: ACORN. 

8 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—During the period that an 

10 entity is in receipt of financial assistance under the 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1710 IS

1 TARP or any other program enacted by the Sec2 retary under the authorities granted to the Secretary 

3 under this Act, such entity shall not provide any as4 sistance to, directly or indirectly, fund, promote, or 

5 in any way contribute to the activities of ACORN or 

6 an ACORN-related affiliate. 

7 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—The prohibition established 

8 in paragraph (1) shall not apply to an entity that 

9 has repaid all outstanding amounts of any financial 

10 assistance that such entity received under the TARP 

11 or any other program enacted by the Secretary 

12 under the authorities granted to the Secretary under 

13 this Act. 

14 ‘‘(b) DISCLOSURE.—Not later than 30 days after the 

15 date of enactment of this section, each entity that has re16 ceived financial assistance under the TARP or any other 

17 program enacted by the Secretary under the authorities 

18 granted to the Secretary under this Act, shall submit a 

19 report to the Secretary and to the appropriate committees 

20 of Congress detailing any assistance, whether direct or in21 direct, that such entity has provided to ACORN or an 

22 ACORN-related affiliate in the prior 12 months. 

23 ‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section— 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1710 IS

1 ‘‘(1) the term ‘ACORN’ means the Association 

2 of Community Organizations for Reform Now and 

3 any ACORN-related affiliate; 

4 ‘‘(2) the term ‘ACORN-related affiliate’ means 

5 any of the following: 

6 ‘‘(A) Any State chapter of ACORN reg7 istered with the Secretary of State’s office in 

8 that State. 

9 ‘‘(B) Any organization that shares direc10 tors or employees with ACORN. 

11 ‘‘(C) Any organization that has a financial 

12 stake, directly or indirectly, in ACORN. 

13 ‘‘(D) Any organization whose finances, 

14 whether federally funded, donor-funded, or 

15 raised through organizational goods and serv16 ices, are shared or controlled, directly or indi17 rectly, by ACORN.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1806 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1806

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosmet Technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 20, 2009

    Mr. Kyl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosmet Technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHOSMET TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       2-                  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (dimethoxyphosphi                                                  31/2011.......
                          nothioyl-
                          sulfanylmethyl)
                          isoindole-1,3-
                          dione (Phosmet
                          technical) (CAS
                          No. 732-11-6)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2930.90.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>






                                 RomTech, Inc.                      Exhibit 11.1
                         Computation of Loss Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                            Years ended June 30,
                                                                                        -----------------------------

                                                                                            1997             1996
                                                                                            ----             ----
<S>                                                                                     <C>              <C>         
Net loss attributable to common stock                                                   ($2,210,359)     ($2,998,480)
                                                                                        ============     ============

Weighted average common shares outstanding, unadjusted                                     6,380,517            - 0 -

Adjustments to common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
    Weighted average common shares outstanding represented by the shares
       received by the stockholders of AOMC in connection with the reverse
       acquisition, and recorded as a recapitalization of the previously
       outstanding common stock of AOMC. Such shares have been retroactively
       restated to reflect the effect of the recapitalization for all periods
       presented.                                                                              - 0 -        1,575,000

    Weighted average common shares outstanding represented by the shares
       received by the stockholders and holders of convertible subordinated
       debt of VRLI in connection with the merger. Such shares have been
       retroactively restated to reflect the effect of the
       recapitalization for all periods presented.                                             - 0 -        1,284,440

    Weighted average common shares outstanding of the Company at the time of
       the merger with AOMC and shares issued in connection with the IPO and
       the exercise of warrants.                                                               - 0 -        2,395,112
                                                                                           ---------        ---------

                                                                                           6,380,517        5,254,552
                                                                                           ---------        ---------

Net loss per common and common equivalent share                                            ($0.35)          ($0.57)
                                                                                           =======          =======
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the
registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31,
2005 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-KSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Date: December 23, 2005

International power Group, Ltd.

/s/ Jack Wagenti
Jack Wagenti
Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Peter Toscano
Peter Toscano
Chief Executive Officer