2008 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 9-12-2008 

# D o e v . C A R S P rot ec t ion P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 06-3625

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2008 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" D oe v . C A R S P r ot e ct ion " (2008). 2008 D e cisio n s . P ape r 445. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008/445

### Ho no ra ble J am es F. McClure, Jr ., Distri ct Judg e for the Unite d S tate s Dis tric t 1 

### Court for the Mi ddl e Di s tr i c t

of Pe nns yl vani a , s i tt i ng by de s i gnat i on. U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

___________ N os . 06- 3625, 06- 4508

___________ J AN E DO E, A ppel l antatN o. 06- 3625

v . C. A. R. S P RO T E CT I ON P L US , I NC . ; F RE D KOHL

__________ J ANE DOE v . C. A. R. S P RO T E CT I ON P L US , I NC . ; F RE D KOHL

C .A .R .S P ro te c tio n P lu s , In c ., A ppel l antatN o. 06- 4508

___________ W D / PA C i vi l N o. 01- cv- 02352) D istri ct Ju d g e: T h e H o n o rab le M au ri ce B . C o h il l, Jr.

__________ B efor e: R E N D E L L and N Y G A A R D , C i r cui tJ udges , and M cC L U R E , D i s t r i ctJ udge. 1 O R D E R T he pane l r ece nt l yent er ed thr ee or der s i n connec t i on w i t h t hi s appea l : t he or dervaca t i ng t he gr antof s um m ar yj udgm ent , r emandi ng t he ca s e t o t he D i s t r i ctC our t ; an or der gr ant i ng a mot i on “t o pr ocee d unders eal and i n ps eudonym ”; and an or derdeny i ng i nt er vent i on s oughtbys ever al publ i cat i ons des i r ous of cha l l engi ng t he s eal i ng of t he cas e, i n w hi ch w e s t at ed “movantm aypur s ue thi s m at t erw i t h t he D i s t r i ctC our tupon r emand”. W e bel i eve w e s houl d cl ar i fyt he s cope of t he r emand r egar di ng t he s eal i ng o rd e r. It is n o t o u r in ten tio n th a t th e o rd e r w e e n ter e d se a lin g th e re c o rd o n a p p e a l w o u ld pr eventt he D i s t r i ctC our tfr om cons i der i ng t hi s i s s ue ane w ; i ndeed, ouror ders ugges t i ng fur t herpur s ui tof t hi s i s s ue w as i nt ended t o r efl ectourvi ew t hatt he D i s t r i ctC our tw as t he bet t ercour ti n w hi ch thi s i s s ue coul d be l i t i gat ed, s i nce i tcoul d hol d a hea r i ng, andJu d g e N y g aa rd d ec li n es to join this o rde r be ca u se itw as n o t r eq u ested b yeit h er 2 p a r t y a n d b e c a u s e h e c o n s i d e r s i tu n n e c e s s a r y. 2 had done s o pr evi ous l yon t hi s ver yi s s ue att he out s etof t he ca s e, and s i nce the r ecor d on appea l cons i s t s i n l ar ge meas ur e of the r ecor d m ade i n t he D i s t r i ctC our t . T he i s s ue of the pr opr i etyof t he cont i nued s eal i ng of t he ca s e now t hati tw i l l pr ocee d t o t r i al i s an i m por t antone; t he D i s t r i ctC our ts houl d fee l fr ee t o deci de thi s i s s ue unfe t t er ed byour rul i ngs t o dat e. 2 B yth e C o u rt, /s/ M a rjo rie O . R e n d e ll C i r cui tJ udge D at ed: Sept ember 9, 2008 cl c\ cc: G aryM . D avi s , E s q. D ean E. C ol l i ns , E s q. R ober tJ . W ai ne, E s q.