alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gerard Tully, Sr., et al., Respondents, v Kenneth A. Tully et al., Appellants. (Matter No. 1.) In the Matter of Gerard Tully, Sr., Petitioner. Willets Point Contracting Corp. et al., Respondents. (Matter No. 2.) (And Two Other Related Matters.)

In a stockholders’ derivative action, which was consolidated with a proceeding, *inter alia,*seeking dissolution of six closely-held corporations, and the appointment of a permanent receiver, Kenneth A. Tully and Harry C. Irwin appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Nahman, J.), dated January 3, 1991, as granted, without a hearing, those branches of the motion of the plaintiff Gerard Tully, Sr., which were for dissolution of the six closely-held corporations and the appointment of a permanent receiver.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by (1) deleting from the first paragraph thereof the words "and appointment of a permanent receiver”, (2) deleting from the third decretal paragraph thereof the provision which appoints Peter J. Johnson as receiver of the corporations, (3) deleting the sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh decretal paragraphs, and (4) deleting from the twelfth decretal paragraph the words "until the receiver files his oath and bond as aforesaid”; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

The appellant Kenneth A. Tully, and his brother Gerard Tully, Sr., sought, in relevant part, dissolution of six closely-held corporations in which each brother owned 50% of the shares. The appellant Harry C. Irwin is the treasurer of two of the six corporations. In addition, Gerard Tully, Sr., sought, in relevant part, the appointment of a permanent receiver for the corporations.

Contrary to the appellants’ contention, that branch of the motion of Gerard Tully, Sr., which was for dissolution of the six closely-held corporations was properly granted for reasons stated by Justice Nahman in his memorandum decision dated July 17, 1990.

However, we agree with the appellants that the conflicting petitions and affidavits raise significant issues regarding whether a permanent receiver should have been appointed *609and if so, whether Kenneth A. Tully should have been named as permanent receiver. Consequently, we find that the Supreme Court erred by appointing a permanent receiver without first conducting a hearing *(see,*Business Corporation Law §§ 1113, 1202 [a] [1]; § 1203 [b]). The order appealed from has been modified accordingly. We note that if the Supreme Court, after a hearing, again determines that a permanent receiver is necessary, the deleted provisions of the order with regard to the receivership may be reinstated; if, after a hearing, the Supreme Court determines that a permanent receiver is not warranted, then it should issue directions to facilitate the orderly dissolution of the corporations. Kooper, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1955 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1955

       To suspend temporarily the duty on acrylic resin solution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on acrylic resin solution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACRYLIC RESIN SOLUTION.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Acrylic resin       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        solution, beta-                                                    31/2011.......
                        hydroxyethyl
                        acrylate, acrylic
                        acid, styrene, 2-
                        ethylhexyl
                        acrylate, butyl
                        methacrylate
                        polymer (CAS No.
                        63076-05-1)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3906.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1877 

To suspend temporarily the duty on dry adhesive copolyamide pellets. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on dry adhesive copolyamide 

pellets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DRY ADHESIVE COPOLYAMIDE PELLETS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Piperazine co-polymerized copolyamide resin high-temperature melt adhesive pellets 

(CAS Nos. 118106–10–8, 

1000189–84–3, or 1000189– 

29–6) (provided for in subheading 3809.10.00 or 

3908.90.70) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1877 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Order filed, December 13, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00730-CV

____________

HUA XU, Appellant

V.

DAVID K. LAM (AKA'S: KA PUN LAM, KA P. LAM, DAVID LAM, 

KAPUN LAM) SUN, INDIVIDUALLY AND JIA TIAN AKA ANGELA

TIAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-79571

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due October 30, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. On October 30, 2013, this court granted Amanda King’s motion 

for extension of time to file the record to November 17, 2013. The court has not 

received another request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not 
been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, 

we issue the following order.

We order Amanda King, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2378

GERALD L. WILSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JESSE BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CA-97-48-3) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: December 30, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Gerald L. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Gerald L. Wilson appeals the district court’s order denyingrelief on his complaint alleging wrongful discharge from employment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinionand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilson v. Brown , No. CA-97-48-3 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 5. 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RHONDA LA MAE FARNAM,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner

of Social Security Administration,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 14-35907

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-06047-KLS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Karen L. Strombom, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 25, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Rhonda Farnam appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s partial denial of her application for disability

insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the

FILED

FEB 29 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo, Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir. 2012), and we affirm.

The administrative law judge (“ALJ”), on remand from the Appeals Council,

properly accorded “little weight” to the contradicted opinion of orthopedic surgeon

Dr. Lynn Staker because Farnam’s return to full-time work for nearly seven

months during the alleged period of disability was a specific and legitimate reason

for the discounted weight. See Valentine v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin., 574 F.3d

685, 692-93 (9th Cir. 2009). 

The ALJ provided specific, clear, and convincing reasons for his credibility

finding by citing both the medical evidence and the fact that Farnam returned to

full-time work during the alleged period of disability. See Burch v. Barnhart, 400

F.3d 676, 680 (9th Cir. 2005). Although the ALJ may have erred in relying on

Farnam’s daily activities as a reason for discounting her credibility, any error was

harmless because the ALJ relied upon two other reasons that were supported by

substantial evidence. See Molina, 674 F.3d at 1115. 

Because the ALJ’s credibility finding is supported by substantial evidence

and the ALJ properly evaluated the medical evidence, we reject Farnam’s assertion

that the ALJ erred in making the residual functional capacity finding or in posing

2
the hypothetical question to the vocational expert. See Osenbrock v. Apfel, 240

F.3d 1157, 1164-65 (9th Cir. 2001).

AFFIRMED.

3
NUMBER 13-19-00324-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

WILLIAM STIRLING PICK, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

On Appeal from the 24th District Court

of Calhoun County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

Currently pending before the Court is appellant's pro se motion for access to the 

appellate record. Appellant's counsel has filed an Anders brief herein and appellant has 

been unable to examine the record so that he can file a pro se brief. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion and it 

is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully 
2

examine the appellate record on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of 

this order, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the 

date upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. 

State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from 

the day the appellate record was first made available to him to file his pro se brief with 

this Court. The State shall have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed this the

11th day of September, 2019.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fresh Harvest Products, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Jordan Friedman, Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





|                     |                                                                                                                                                | 
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                     | FRESH HARVEST PRODUCTS, INC.                                                                                                                   | 
|Dated: June 10, 2010 | /s/ Michael Jordan Friedman                                                                                                                    | 
|                     | Michael Jordan Freidman
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)
(Principal Financial/Accounting Officer) |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.27



Tim Perry                                                   November 15, 1996
Senior Vice President
Global Oil & Gas
Texas Commerce Bank
2200 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 75266-0197


Dear Tim:


The undersigned, Union Pacific Resources Group Inc. (UPRG), refers to the
$900,000,000 Revolving Credit Agreement  dated as of April 16, 1996 (amended
August 9, 1996 and September 13, 1996) among UPRG and Texas Commerce Bank, as
Administrative Agent, and the other participating banks, and hereby gives you
notice, irrevocably, pursuant to SECTION 2.06 of the Credit Agreement that the
undersigned hereby requests a commitment reduction from $900,000,000 to
$600,000,000 effective November 19, 1996.  UPRG requests that the respective
Commitments of the banks be reduced ratably.



                                        Sincerely

                                        /s/ B. M. Lamkin
                                        ----------------
                                        Bill Lamkin
                                        Treasurer





cc:      Lee Beckelman
         Ann Baumgartner
Memorandum 

To: David Putney, EPA/OAQPS 

From: David Green, RTI 

Date: August 21, 2014 

Subject: Summary of Conference Call with Century Aluminum (KY) Representatives 

I. Purpose

 The purpose of the call was to discuss high run-to-run and year-to-year variations in 

particulate matter (PM) emissions from bake furnaces at Century Aluminum of Kentucky. 

II. Date and Time 

 The call was held August 20, 2014 between 10:00 a.m. and 10:45 a.m. 

III. Attendees

 David Putney, EPA/OAQPS 

 Chuck French, EPA/OAQPS 

 David Green, RTI 

 Jamie Coomes, Century Aluminum 

 James Marksbury, Century Aluminum 

 Nick Paulin, Century Aluminum 

IV. Summary

 

 Century operates three anode bake furnaces that are co-controlled by a dry alumina 

scrubber/baghouse system. The baghouse is equipped with polyester bags supplied by BWF. The 

newest furnace was constructed in 1998, at which time the control system was added. The 

baghouse exhaust is subject to a state PM limit of 3.575 pounds PM/hour and is in compliance 

with this limit based on annual Method 5 compliance tests composed of 3 or more runs. 

 PM emissions have varied from year to year by a factor of greater than 5, and within a 

single test, PM concentrations have varied from run to run by as much as an order of magnitude. 

These variations cannot be explained by changes in operating conditions or throughput and there 

is no indication of control system malfunction during the course of a test. The baghouse is 

equipped with a bag leak detection system which has not indicated leakage during testing. 

Further, the same test contractor has conducted all of the tests in recent years. 

 Century uses a manual firing system, in contrast to most other facilities which use 

automatic systems to adjust gas usage, pitch burn rate and temperature. Operators check each 

exhaust manifold every 4 hours to make sure that they do not have excessive pre-control system 
2 

emissions, and have work practices to limit emissions. There have been no visible emissions 

during testing. Capital costs to upgrade the manual firing system to an automatic firing system 

are estimated to be approximately $8-10 million. 

V. Follow-up Actions

 Century agreed to provide EPA with PM performance test reports for recent years and 

air/cloth ratio data for the baghouse; and to discuss the high particulate loading associated with 

the bagfilter exhaust during some of the test runs with BWF personnel and provide a summary of 

that discussion to the EPA. 

 EPA agreed to request information from The Aluminum Association as to whether any 

other primary aluminum production facilities utilize a manual firing system on their bake 

furnaces and to have personnel from EPG review the test reports for recent years.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

s0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

140876 & (20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140876 COA: 294601 Wayne CC: 04-011031 VERNICE RAY ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 8, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this C ourt. The motion for

miscellaneous relief is DENIED.
```

[Federal Register: September 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 183)]
[Notices]               
[Page 57825-57826]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22se10-115]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7181]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Ancient Chinese Bronzes From the Shouyang Studio: The 
Katherine and George Fan Collection''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and

[[Page 57826]]

Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 
note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and 
Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby 
determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition ``Ancient 
Chinese Bronzes from the Shouyang Studio: The Katherine and George Fan 
Collection,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, from on or about 
November 5, 2010, until on or about January 2, 2011, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 16, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-23694 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report of FCB Bancorp (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report).

I, C. G. Kum, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 14, 2006



By:

/s/ C. G. KumC.G. Kum President and Chief Executive Officer