alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p. 1



# OAR Box 1107 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 62 ) IV-B-1 2 Docket Number: 

# A-81-2 1

Printed 4/11/2008 3:03:47

PM Sheet 62 of 90P. 2 

# A-8.I-2 I IV-B-1 2 UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y 1 ^ W ^ S Offic e o fAi rQualit yPlannin g an d Standard s ^Ifc^b / Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1 o, 

### X, 

### 2 7 AU G 

### 19 8 6

MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : Discussion s wit h OM B o n V C Promulgatio n Packag e FROM : Fred Dimmic k ^T**

Standard s Developmen t Branch (MD-13 ) TO : Recor

d Durin g Jul yan

d Augus t 1986 , I discusse d th e viny l chlorid e (VC ) promulgatio n packag e wit h Mr . Ar t Fraa s o f th e Offic e o f Managemen t an d Budge t (OMB) . H

e ha d two basi c questions : (1 ) wh ydi d we no t complet e a ris k assessmen t fo r thi s packag e an d (2 ) wha t i s th e TRE (tota l resourc e effectiveness ) fo r oxychlorinatio n vent s a t V C plants . I

n response , I answered , respectively , tha t (1 ) becaus e durin g our reviewstud

ywe ha d no t foun d a need t o chang e th e stringencyo f th e standards , a ris k assessmen t woul d have used our limited resource s withou t addin g usefu l informatio n t o th e packag e (w

e wer e revisin

g th e standard onl yt o clarif yuncertai n administrativ e aspect s o f the rule ) and , therefore , we di d no t complet e a ris k assessmen t an d (2 ) th e TR E ranged fro m0. 5 fo r mos t newsource s t o abou t 1. 4 fo r th e onl yexisting sourc e withou t a n incinerator . Mr . Fraa s wa s concerne d abou t whethe r we needed t o cit e th e newsourc e performanc e standard s (NSPS ) fo r ai r oxidatio n [i n additio n t o requirement s unde r new sourc e review(NSR) ] a s a basi s fo r no t increasin g th e stringencyo f th e oxychlorinatio n ven t standard . Becaus e NSR include s consideratio n o f NSPS , citin

g NSP S directl yi s no t needed an d I tol d Mr . Fraa s this . Based o n our removin

g the citatio n o

n th e botto

mo f pag e 6 t o th e NSP S fo r ai r oxidation , Mr . Fraa s fel t tha t OM B coul d approve th e V C promulgatio n package . cc : B . Aja

x (MD-13 ) J . Farme r (MD-13 ) E . Sal o (LE-132A ) V . Thomson (ANR-443 ) S . Wyat t (MD-13 )
#### R.R. SATHER, dba Sather Jewelry Company, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. George S. GROSS and JoAnn Gross, Defendants and Respondents.

No. 20409.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Oct. 16, 1986.

Anthony J. Famulary, Roosevelt, for plaintiff and appellant.

*213N. George Daines, Logan, for defendants and respondents.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff brought suit against defendants to enforce the payment of monies owed under a contract for the purchase of a diamond. At the end of plaintiffs case in chief, defendants brought a motion to dismiss on the ground that there was no meeting of the minds between the parties as to the purchase price. The trial court granted the motion by an unsigned minute entry dated November 21, 1984, and plaintiff appeals from “the order entered in this action on November 21, 1984.” No order appears in the record and apparently none was entered.

An appeal can be taken only from the entry of a final judgment that concludes the action. *Pate v. Marathon Steel Co.,*692 P.2d 765 (Utah 1984). An unsigned minute entry does not constitute a final judgment for purposes of appeal, and this Court has no jurisdiction to consider the merits of plaintiffs appeal. Utah R.Civ.P. 58A(b) and (c); Utah R.App.P. 3(a), 4(a); *South Salt Lake v. Burton,*718 P.2d 405 (1986); *State Tax Commission v. Erekson,*714 P.2d 1151 (1986); *Wisden v. City of Salina,*696 P.2d 1205 (Utah 1985); *Wilson v. Manning,*645 P.2d 655 (Utah 1982).

Plaintiffs appeal is dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7605

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MELVIN DARTFIELD CHRISTIAN, a/k/a Melvin D. Christian,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior

District Judge. (3:10-cr-00200-JRS-1; 3:12-cv-00702-JRS)

Submitted: April 30, 2015 Decided: May 6, 2015

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Dartfield Christian, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel 

Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Dartfield Christian seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Christian has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Atteburry, Also Known as Michael Atteberry, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Roberts, J.), rendered April 24, 1989, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Judgment, of the same court and Justice, rendered April 24, 1989, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 to 4 years, unanimously modified on the law and the facts to reduce the conviction to criminal sale of a *408controlled substance in the fifth degree, and otherwise affirmed.

As the People concede, the clear purpose and intent of the plea agreement was to have defendant enter a second guilty plea to the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. Since defendant received the bargained for term of imprisonment, there is no need to remand for resentencing. *(People v Edwards,*41 AD2d 707.) Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.
# L_2007017EN.01002301.xml

| 24.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 17/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 17/23

---

Corrigendum to Council Joint Action 2006/773/CFSP of 13 November 2006 amending and extending Joint Action 2005/889/CFSP on establishing a European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 313 of 14 November 2006
  )

Page 15, point 2 of Article 1

For:

| ‘2. | Article 13(1) shall be replaced by the following:

  ‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mission shall be EUR 1 696 659 for 2005 and EUR 5 903 341 for the period from 1 January 2006 until 24 May 2007.’;’ |
| --- | --- |

‘2.

Article 13(1) shall be replaced by the following:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mission shall be EUR 1 696 659 for 2005 and EUR 5 903 341 for the period from 1 January 2006 until 24 May 2007.’;’

Read:

| ‘2. | Article 13(1) shall be replaced by the following:

  ‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure for the period from 25 November 2005 until 24 May 2007 related to the mission shall be EUR 7 600 000.’;’ |
| --- | --- |

‘2.

Article 13(1) shall be replaced by the following:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure for the period from 25 November 2005 until 24 May 2007 related to the mission shall be EUR 7 600 000.’;’

---
##### 



Exhibit 10.6
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
CREDIT AGREEMENT
 Amendment US BIO DYERSVILLE, LLC, Borrower AGSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, PCA Agent
 RECITALS
 Credit Agreement
   AGREEMENT
  Amendments to Credit Agreement
 Section 5.01(c)(xvii)




---



##### 



Conditions to Effectiveness of this Amendment .
 Representations and Warranties .
   Miscellaneous .
 Effect; Ratification
 Loan Documents
 Counterparts
 Severability
 GOVERNING LAW




---



##### 



WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL




---



##### 



SIGNATURE PAGE TO
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
 BY AND BETWEEN
 US BIO DYERSVILLE, LLC,
 And
 AGSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, PCA, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
   BORROWER:
 US BIO DYERSVILLE, LLC
 /s/ Kelly S. LangleyBy:
    
    Kelly S. LangleyIts:
    
    Treasurer




---



##### 



SIGNATURE PAGE TO
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
 BY AND BETWEEN
 US BIO DYERSVILLE, LLC,
 And
 AGSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, PCA, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
   AGENT:
 AGSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, PCA,
 /s/ Mark SchmidtBy:
    
    Mark SchmidtIts:
    
    Vice President




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 CONSENT AND REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY
    US BIOENERGY CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Kelly S. LangleyName:
    Kelly S. LangleyIts:  Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1909 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1909

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on strontium magnesium 
                phosphate-tin doped inorganic products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

  Mr. Roberts introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on strontium magnesium 
                phosphate-tin doped inorganic products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STRONTIUM MAGNESIUM PHOSPHATE-TIN DOPED INORGANIC PRODUCTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.68 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to strontium magnesium 
phosphate-tin doped inorganic products) is amended by striking the date 
in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TALInternational Group, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Chand Khan, Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                         |
|--|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                    |
|--|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. |

Date: August10,  2006

|        |  |  |                                                    |
|--------|--|--|----------------------------------------------------|
|   |  |  | /s/Chand Khan                                      |
|   |  |  | Chand KhanVice Presidentand Chief FinancialOfficer |
|        |

----
#### Margaret Maroney, Respondent, v Thomas W. Maroney, Appellant.

In a matrimonial action, in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated February 25, 1980, the defendant husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered August 7, 1989, as granted the plaintiff wife’s motion to compel him to pay the full cost of the college tuition, room and board for the parties’ daughter Erin.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto limiting the defendant’s obligation to pay Erin’s college costs for tuition, room and board until Erin attains the age of 21 years; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In the absence of a voluntary agreement, a parent may not be directed to pay support or to contribute to the college education of a child who has attained the age of 21 years *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 32; *Bani-Esraili v Lerman,*69 NY2d 807, 808; *Morrissey v Morrissey,*153 AD2d 609, 612). At bar, there was no express agreement. We have, therefore, modified the order appealed from to limit the duration of the defendant’s obligation until the date Erin reaches the age of 21 *(see, Morrissey v Morrissey, supra; Hirsch v Hirsch,*142 AD2d 138, 144-145).

*686We further hold that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in directing the defendant to bear the full cost of the tuition, room and board for the parties’ daughter Erin while ordering the plaintiff to pay only for Erin’s school books and travel expenses between college and home. Upon our review of the record, we find that special circumstances have been established to warrant requiring the defendant to pay for Erin’s college education *(see, e.g., Hirsch v Hirsch, supra; Jackson v Jackson,*138 AD2d 455; *Kaplan v Wallshein,*57 AD2d 828, 829).

Furthermore, the defendant’s financial means are such that he is far better suited to bear the greater share of this mutual obligation *(see, Matter of Tibaldi v Otten,*111 AD2d 859; *Giuffrida v Giuffrida,*81 AD2d 905, 906). Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14570-14571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5861]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Integrative Activities, <greek-i>1373; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Ad Hoc Advisory Committee on the Merit Review Process 
(MRPAC).
    Date/Time: March 28, 2012; 12 p.m.-4 p.m., EDT.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
I-360 Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Ms. Victoria Fung, National Science Foundation 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA, 22230. Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#93e5f5e6fdf4d3fde0f5bdf4fce5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aed8c8dbc0c9eec0ddc880c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>.
    If you plan to attend the meeting, please send an email with 
your name and affiliation to the individual listed above, by the day 
before the meeting, so that a visitor badge can be prepared.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice concerning issues related 
to NSF's merit review process.

Agenda

    <bullet> Welcome.
    <bullet> Update on outreach activities.
    <bullet> Discussion of potential pilots of enhancements to the 
merit review process.
    For latest details information, please check with this following 
link: http://www.nsf.gov/

[[Page 14571]]

od/oia/additional--resources/AC-MeritReview/index.jsp.

    Dated: March 7, 2012.
 Susanne Bolton,
 Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-5861 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

130769 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. CHERYL SALOKA, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 130769 COA: 255954 Macomb CC: 02-005423-NZ SHELBY NURSING CENTER JOINT VENTURE, a/k/a PINE HURST EAST, INC., a/k/a BEAUMONT NURSING HOME, CRYSTAL REICK, VICTORIA CICONE, PREMIERE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, INC., and RENEE DECEMBER, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to a ppeal the December 6, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0619 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Cray Inc. (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 4, 2011/s/ PETER J. UNGAROPeter J. UngaroChief Executive Officer and President/s/ BRIAN C. HENRYBrian C. HenryChief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           838
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    6,964
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              10,330
<PP&E>                                         1,881
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                12,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,337
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          12
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  12,300
<SALES>                                       13,806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              13,806
<CGS>                                          8,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 11,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 748
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (6,330)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (6,330)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (6,330)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.74)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit
        32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION**
  **Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 **(Subsections
        (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
        Code)**
  Pursuant
        to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
        of
        section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
        undersigned officers of Platinum Energy Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation
        (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
        that:
  The
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the
        “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained
        in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: December
                 7, 2005
              
              /s/ Mark
                NordlichtMark
                NordlichtChairman
                of the Board
   A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.