alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006023EN.01005301.xml

| 27.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 23/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 23/53

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 140/2006

of 26 January 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 24 January 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 24 January 2006.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 24 January 2006, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 12,20 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 January 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1239/2005 (OJ L 200, 30.7.2005, p. 32).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1814/2005 (OJ L 292, 8.11.2005, p. 3).

3

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-98440, 33-98444, 33-98442, 33-98446, 333-21799, 333-21795 and
333-70599) on Form S-8 and the Registration Statements (No. 333-20479 and
333-79695) on Form S-3 of CheckFree Holdings Corporation of our reports dated
August 9, 1999, appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of CheckFree Holdings Corporation for the year ended June 30, 1999.


/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
September 24, 1999
# L_2006335EN.01004701.xml

| 1.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 335/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 335/47

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2006/866/CFSP

of 30 November 2006

extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission (EUMM)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 23(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2002/921/CFSP of 25 November 2002 extending the mandate of the European Union Monitoring Mission (1), and in particular Article 5(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 21 November 2005, the Council adopted Decision 2005/808/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of Ms Maryse DAVIET as Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission (EUMM). In accordance with this Decision, her mandate expires on 31 December 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 21 November 2005, the Council adopted Decision 2005/808/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of Ms Maryse DAVIET as Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission (EUMM). In accordance with this Decision, her mandate expires on 31 December 2006.

| (2) | On 30 November 2006, the Council adopted Joint Action 2006/867/CFSP extending and amending the mandate of the European Union Monitoring Mission (EUMM) until 31 December 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 30 November 2006, the Council adopted Joint Action 2006/867/CFSP extending and amending the mandate of the European Union Monitoring Mission (EUMM) until 31 December 2007.

| (3) | The mandate of the Head of Mission of the EUMM should therefore also be extended, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The mandate of the Head of Mission of the EUMM should therefore also be extended,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The mandate of Ms Maryse DAVIET as Head of Mission of the EUMM is hereby extended until 31 December 2007.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2006.

For the Council

The President

L. HYSSÄLÄ

---

(1)  
  OJ L 321, 26.11.2002, p. 51. Joint Action as last amended by Joint Action 2005/807/CFSP (OJ L 303, 22.11.2005, p. 61).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 303, 22.11.2005, p. 62.

2

---
From: Raj Rao/RTP/USEPA/US To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov > Date: 08/09/2010 06:17 PM Subject: Final FIP Files

GHG FIP Call Proposal 090810 RLSO.doc GHG FIP Cal l Proposal 080910.doc

Please call me with the green signal. Thanks for a ll your help.

Raj Raj Rao, P.E. Group Leader, NSRG OAQPS/AQPD(MD- C504-03) 109 TW Alexander Drive RTP, NC 27709 919-541-5344 919-541-5509 fax

Note: Positions or views expressed here do not rep resent official EPA policy. Interagency deliberative and Confidential.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MISAEL CARBAJAL MEJIA, AKA

Misael Bonilla Silva,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-73829

Agency No. A078-062-194

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 12, 2016** 

Pasadena, California

Before: FARRIS, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Misael Carbajal Mejia, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal

FILED

FEB 19 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings. Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). 

Before the agency, Carbajal Mejia claimed he was persecuted and fears

persecution on account of his political opinion and membership in a particular

social group of National Party members. Substantial evidence supports the

agency’s conclusion that Carbajal Mejia did not establish a nexus to a protected

ground based on the problems he experienced after witnessing the killing of a

mayoral candidate. See Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740-42 (9th Cir.

2009) (the REAL ID Act “requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central

reason’ for an asylum applicant’s persecution”; record did not compel finding of

nexus). Thus, Carbajal Mejia’s withholding of removal claim fails.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

Carbajal Mejia failed to establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured at

the instigation of or with the acquiescence of the government if returned to

Honduras. See Silaya, 524 F.3d at 1073.

Finally, according to the government, Carbajal Mejia was removed from the

United States on March 11, 2014. Thus, his challenges as to his detention and the

denial of a bond hearing are moot.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# L_2006100EN.01000901.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 100/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 100/9

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 579/2006

of 7 April 2006

on the issue of system B export licences in the fruit and vegetables sector (lemons)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1961/2001 of 8 October 2001 on detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards export refunds on fruit and vegetables (2), and in particular Article 6(6) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 230/2006 (3) fixes the indicative quantities for which system B export licences may be issued. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 230/2006 (3) fixes the indicative quantities for which system B export licences may be issued.

| (2) | In the light of the information available to the Commission today, there is a risk that the indicative quantities laid down for the current export period for lemons will shortly be exceeded. This overrun will prejudice the proper working of the export refund scheme in the fruit and vegetables sector. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In the light of the information available to the Commission today, there is a risk that the indicative quantities laid down for the current export period for lemons will shortly be exceeded. This overrun will prejudice the proper working of the export refund scheme in the fruit and vegetables sector.

| (3) | To avoid this situation, applications for system B licences for lemons after 7 April 2006 should be rejected until the end of the current export period, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

To avoid this situation, applications for system B licences for lemons after 7 April 2006 should be rejected until the end of the current export period,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for system B export licences for lemons submitted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 230/2006, export declarations for which are accepted after 7 April and before 16 May 2006, are hereby rejected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 8 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 April 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 268, 9.10.2001, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 39, 10.2.2006, p. 10.

3

---
---

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Johannes T. Petersen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Century Petroleum Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls
and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based
on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report
any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of
internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 9, 2008

/s/ Johannes T. Petersen
  Johannes T. Petersen, Chief Financial
  Officer, Secretary and Director 
  (Principal Financial Officer)

---
# \.AA- 2010- 

# i03,(; Contacts. With whom outside the FAA hasthis proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli COlli 

# --- Regional Airline Association DaveLotterer
~ Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 

# - ATA CraigFabian


# -- ATA 1\1Lopez 

# ---- 09/29/06
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0238

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH BRIAN MCELROY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including January 29, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 20 2023

12/20/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0238
---

Exhibit: 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Som Resources Inc., (the "Company") on
10Q SB for the period ending July 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary Fife, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

Date: September 9, 2005.

/s/Gary Fife
  Gary Fife

Chief Financial Officer
  (Title)

---
BRUSH RUN SPILL 

HOPEWELL TWP. 

WASHINGTON CNTY. 

PENNSYLVANIA 

October 7, 2009 

BACKGROUND 

SAMPLE 1 

TRIBUTARY 

UPSTREAM 

CHERRY RD. 

BACKGROUND 

SAMPLE 2 

UPSTREAM 

BACKGROUND 

FOR BRUSH RUN 

POOL WHERE FIRST 

FISH KILL WAS 

NOTICED 

UNNAMED 

TRIBUTARY TO 

BRUSH RUN OFF 

CHERRY RD. 

BRUSH R

DOWNSTR

FROM TRIB

SPILL 

STRONTIUM T 334.000 UG/L 561.000 UG/L 27,330.000 UG/L 8,810.000 UG/L 3,862.000 MAGNESIUM T 14.700 MG/L 12.500 MG/L 69.020 MG/L 32.480 MG/L 17.500 MMANGANESE T 436.000 UG/L 39.000 UG/L 236.000 UG/L 296.000 UG/L 124.000 UBARIUM T 149.000 UG/L 120.000 UG/L 2,089.000 UG/L 784.000 UG/L 341.000 UCALCIUM T 105.000 MG/L 76.500 MG/L 540.900 MG/L 289.000 MG/L 123.000 MIRON T 1,922.000 UG/L 127.000 UG/L 151.000 UG/L 112.000 UG/L 679.000 UTDS @105 C 414. MG/L 476. MG/L 7,270. MG/L 2,964. MG/L 1,230. M

SODIUM T 6.301 MG/L 42.000 MG/L 1,350.000 MG/L 473.000 MG/L 152.000 M

HARDNESS T 323 MG/L 243 MG/L 1637 MG/L 856 MG/L 380 MG

pH 8.2 pH units 8.1 pH units 7.8 pH units 8.1 pH units 8.0 pH u

SPC @ 25.0 C 613.00 umhos/cm 704.00 umhos/cm 10,490.00 umhos/cm 4,160.00 umhos/cm 1,696.00 umALKALINITY 283.8 MG/L 168.0 MG/L 193.8 MG/L 227.0 MG/L 169.6 MGPOTASSIUM T 9.630 MG/L 4.709 MG/L 21.260 MG/L 12.930 MG/L 6.750 MG
# L_2006130EN.01004201.xml

| 18.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 130/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 130/42

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUPT/1/2006

of 2 May 2006

concerning the appointment of the Head of the EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo) regarding a possible EU crisis management operation in the field of rule of law and possible other areas in Kosovo

(2006/353/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 25 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2006/304/CFSP of 10 April 2006 on the establishment of an EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo) regarding a possible EU crisis management operation in the field of rule of law and possible other areas in Kosovo (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 6 of Joint Action 2006/304/CFSP provides for the Council to authorise the Political and Security Committee to take the relevant decisions in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, including the decision to appoint, upon a proposal by the Secretary-General/High Representative, a Head of the EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 6 of Joint Action 2006/304/CFSP provides for the Council to authorise the Political and Security Committee to take the relevant decisions in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, including the decision to appoint, upon a proposal by the Secretary-General/High Representative, a Head of the EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo).

| (2) | The Secretary-General/High Representative has proposed the appointment of Mr Casper KLYNGE, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Secretary-General/High Representative has proposed the appointment of Mr Casper KLYNGE,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Casper KLYNGE is hereby appointed Head of the EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo) regarding a possible EU crisis management operation in the field of rule of law and possible other areas in Kosovo.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

It shall apply until 31 December 2006.

Done at Brussels, 2 May 2006.

For the Political and Security Committee

The President

F. J. KUGLITSCH

---

(1)  
  OJ L 112, 26.4.2006, p. 19.

1

---
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsCommentaries     Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians
        
            Commentaries
 Keyword
 Type Select a CategoryTop StoriesMission/TrainingFeaturesSecretary of the AFAF Chief of StaffChief Master Sgt. of the AFCommentariesSequestration NewsSpace/TechnologyHumanitarianAFSO 21Women's History Month 1-15EnvironmentalWarrior CareDiversityDignified TransferSafetyHeritageAir Force FamilyPersonnel MattersCommander's Call TopicsHaiti Earthquake ReliefDon't Ask Don't TellSuicide PreventionWarrior GamesEnergyAircraftEtchbergerSexual AssaultOperation TomodachiOperation Odyssey Dawn2011 Appropriations InformationHurricane Irene9/11AFAWeek in PhotosThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their Words2012 Appropriations InformationAfrican American History MonthAfrican American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29Fiscal Year BudgetAir Force StoriesColorado WildfireChief of Staff ArchiveHurricane IsaacAFA 2012APP RSSAPP Airman VisualsExpeditionary OperationsHurricane SandyTransition GPSAir Force in SpaceSports/RecreationH1N1Women's History Month 16-30Oklahoma Tornado ReliefMemorial DayCOVID-19 CommentariesCOVID-19
 RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 Aug. 17, 2022Intentionality is key: Perspectives from a first-time JWLS emcee
        Tech. Sgt. Joan Olmo served as master of ceremonies during the Air Force portion of the 33rd annual Joint Women’s Leadership Symposium in Norfolk, Va.. July 10-13.  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil