alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul J. Carlson, Appellant.

Casey, J. P.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), rendered May 29, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while intoxicated.

Defendant entered a plea of guilty to driving while intoxicated as a felony and, on or about May 19, 1990, was sentenced to one year in jail and fined $500. The felony status of defendant’s crime was based on his prior conviction on October 21, 1980 of driving while intoxicated. On this appeal defendant raises only the issue of the excessiveness of his sentence.

We find no abuse of discretion in the sentence imposed by County Court. Despite defendant’s claimed abstinence from *983alcohol for a two-year period following his initial conviction and his participation in treatment programs, defendant suffered a relapse which resulted in his present conviction. Based on the circumstances, we find no reason to interfere with the sentence imposed *(see, People v Hochberg,*62 AD2d 239, 251). The judgment of conviction should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed. Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Levine, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur.
SCWC

- 1 4

- 00 0 1232

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

IN RE MARN FAMILY LITIGATION

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(MASTER FILE NO. 00

- 1

- MFL 3RD ) ( CAAP

- 14

- 0001232 ; CIVIL NOS. 98

- 5371

- 12 and 98

- 4706

- 10 )

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/ Defendant

- Appellant Alexander Marn ’s
Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on May 6 , 201 9 , is
hereby rejected

.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, June 5 , 2019

.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001232 05-JUN-2019 01:59 PM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2010 

p0322 

Order 

 

March 29, 2010 

138424(54) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138424 

 COA: 275327 

Wayne CC: 02-004012-01 

JAMES DRAIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s January 22, 

2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
USWO - Richard Williamson Secured Promissory Note I


    SECURED
      PROMISSORY NOTE

     

    $141,178.74 

     

    FOR
      VALUE
      RECEIVED, U.S. Wireless Online, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Maker”) promises to
      pay to the order of Richard Williamson, II (“Lender”) in lawful money of the
      United States of America, the principal sum of One Hundred Forty One Thousand
      One Hundred Seventy Eight and Seventy Four One-Hundredths Dollars
      ($141,178.74).

    


    This
      Note
      shall be for a term of 24 months from the date of execution and yield interest
      at a rate of 16% per annum. Payments shall be made at $10,000 per month for
      the
      first three months, $11,000 per month for months 4 through 12, $1,014.90 per
      month for months 13 through 23 and $1,014.84 for the final payment in month
      24.

    


    This
      Note
      is to be secured by the Maker pursuant to a Security Agreement dated December
      27, 2006 between Richard Williamson, II and IElement Corporation.

    


    This
      Promissory Note is made pursuant to the Settlement Agreement dated December
      21,
      2006 between U.S. Wireless Online, Inc., a Nevada corporation, DHR Technologies,
      Inc., a Florida corporation, Richard Williamson, II, an individual and IElement
      Corporation, a Nevada corporation, (the “Settlement Agreement”), the terms of
      which are incorporated herein by reference.

    


    The
      laws
      of the State of Nevada shall govern the form and essential validity of this
      Note.

    


    Time
      is
      of the essence with respect to all Maker’s obligations and agreements under this
      Note.

    


    This
      Note
      and all the provisions, conditions, promises, and covenants hereof shall inure
      to the benefit of Lender, his successors and assigns, and shall be binding
      upon
      the Maker, its successors and assigns. 

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker has caused its duly authorized officers to execute
      this Note on its behalf as of the date and year first set forth
      above.

     

    
      U.S.
        Wireless Online, Inc.

      By:
        /s/
        Rick E. Hughes

      Name:
        Rick E. Hughes

      Title:
        President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Wilson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered September 9, 1988, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*752Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The People proved that the defendant had retreated to complete safety when he returned to the victim’s premises and inflicted multiple knife wounds in the victim’s neck, and the upper portion of the victim’s back, close to the neck area *(see,*Penal Law § 35.15 [2]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). The victim testified that he had backed the defendant away from his yard and onto the sidewalk with a metal pipe. When the victim turned around, the defendant came up from behind and stabbed him in the back. The victim then fell and hit his head on the pavement, and the defendant stabbed him three times in the neck. While the eyewitnesses to the assault produced somewhat varying versions of the event, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). As it cannot be said that the jury’s verdict was clearly unsupported by the record, it should not be disturbed.

We similarly reject the defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by reason of the prosecutor’s summation remarks. The record shows that the court sustained most of defense counsel’s objections to the improper remarks. The remainder of the complained-of remarks were either within the bounds of permissible rhetorical comment afforded counsel during summation *(see, People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105) or unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Balls,*69 NY2d 641).

Finally, there is no basis on the record to disturb the sentence imposed *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Brown and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Order entered January 25, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00044
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF C .P., A CHILD On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469
- 30012
- 2018



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 14, 2019 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. We GRANT the motion. The notice of appeal filed in the trial
court on Janua ry 10, 2019 is deemed timely for jurisdictional purposes. This accelerated appeal involves the termination of appellant’s parental rights. The appellate record is overdue. The district clerk and court reporter have informed the Court that they have not f

iled their respective records due to nonpayment. On January 22 nd , appellant filed a motion to extend the time to file the clerk’s and reporter’s record s . Appellant explains in the motion that she filed an affidavit of indigency in the trial court on Febr uary 5, 2018. Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 provides that “[a] party who files a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs cannot be required to pay costs except by order of the court[.]” See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145. Because nothing before this Court reflects the trial court has ordered appellant topay costs, we GRANT the motion to the extent that we ORDER the clerk’s and reporter’s

records be filed no later than February 5, 2019

. Also before the Court is appellant’s January 22nd motion fo r an extension of time to remit this Court’s filing fee. In light of appellant’s affidavit of indigence, we DENY the motion
as moot. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Lynne Finley, Collin County District Clerk, Stephanie Hu nn, Official Court Reporter for the 469th Judicial District Court, and all parties.
/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2007109EN.01005101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 109/51 |

---

Corrigendum to Decision 2006/609/EC fixing an indicative allocation by Member State of the commitment appropriations for the European territorial cooperation objective for the period 2007-2013

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 247 of 9 September 2006](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2006_247_R_TOC)
)

Due to a material error (in table 1 of the Annex, two amounts concerning Latvia and Lithuania had been inversed), the entries for Latvia and Lithuania in table 1 of the Annex to Decision 2006/609/EC of 4 August 2006 are hereby replaced by the following:

On page 28, the entries for Latvia and Lithuania in table 1 of the Annex should read as follows:

| | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Member State | | | | | --- | --- | | TABLE 1 — | Amount of appropriations (EUR, 2004 prices) | | | | | | | |
| Regions eligible under the European territorial cooperation objective | | | | | Additional funding referred to in Annex II of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 under paragraph: | |
| Cross-border | | | | Transnational | §21 | §22 |
| Internal | Transfer ENPI | Transfer IPA | Total |
| ‘Latvija | 50 791 319 | 21 417 000 | | 72 208 319 | 7 617 737 | | |
| Lietuva | 60 432 203 | 25 380 000 | | 85 812 203 | 11 299 892 ’ | | |

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification ofPrincipal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350,

As AdoptedPursuant to

Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David M. Tierney,principal financial officer of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P., certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 
| (1)    |   | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                     |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                       |
| (2)    |   | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |

 
| Date: November 14,  2008 | /s/ David M. Tierney                                 |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | David M. Tierney                                     |
|                          | Chief Accounting  Officer – Public Partnerships |
|                          | Reef Exploration, L.P.                               |
|                          | *(principal financial and  accounting officer)*      |

 

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of § 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by § 906 has been providedto the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
### EXHIBIT -A YUNEEC QSOO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Aeroflite, Inc only utilizes safe and reliable UAS. Yuneec is a leader in small UAS production. Yuneec UAS are loaded with ground breaking software enablingthe user to setparameters which will not allow flight into controlled airspace. Parameters can also be set to limit flight to no higherthan apredetermined and set altitude as well as limit flight to a predetermined and set distance. Inaddition, Yuneec software provides real-time altitude and location informationto the PIC viathe linkedmonitor or smartphone/tablet devices. Yuneec QSOO Aircraft • Flight Time - Upto 25 Minutes • Dimension - 16.5x16.5x9.5in (420x420x240mm) • Diagonal LengthWithout RotorBlades - 22.2in (565mm) • Propeller/MainRotorDiameter - 13.0in (330mm) • Weight Without Battery and Payload - 40.0oz (1130g) • Battery - 5400mAh 3S 11.1V LiPo (included) • Charger - 3S 11.1V LiPo DC Balancing Smart Charger withAC Adapter (included) • Transmitter - 10-channel2.4GHzwith 5.8GHz video downlink (included) • 3 Flight Modes - Smart, Angle and HomeModes • Maximum Flying Height - Default 122m (400ft) Above Ground Level (Adjustable viathe Q500 GUI) • MaximumRotationRate - 65°/s • MaximumRoll Angle - 35° • Operating Temperature Range - 

### -5o to 80

### o Gimbal/Camera • Dimension - 4.5x1.4x2.9in (115x135x74mm) • Weight - 6.5oz (185g) • Focusing System - Aerial OptimizedFixedFocus • Field ofView - 130° • Video Transmission Range - FCC Compliance: Up to 600m (1968.5 ft) CE Compliance: Up to 300m (984.252 ft) with STl0 • Video Resolution - FULL HD 1 080p - Adjustable 60, 50 or48 FPS • Photo Resolution - 16 Megapixels • Storage (memory) - microSD Class 10, 4 to 128GB • Control Angle Accuracy - ±0.02° • White Balance - Automatic White Balance • Transmission Band - 5.8GHz • Input/Operating Voltage - 7.0V to 14.0V DC • Working Temperature - 0°C-50°C • Storage Temperature - -200 to 600 • AngularVibration Range - ±0.02° • Control Range - Pitch : between -90° and 0° Yaw : between 0° and 360° Ground Station 23• Operating System - AndroidTM • Number ofChannels - 1 0 • Control Transmission Distance/Range (Optimum Conditions) - FCC Compliance: Upto 800m (2624.67 ft) CE Compliance: Upto 400m (1312.34 ft) • Robust Radio Control Modulation - Yuneec Protocol • Video linkFrequency Band - 5.8GHz • Video Transmission Distance/Range (Optimum Conditions) - FCC Compliance: Upto 600m (1968.5 ft) CE Compliance: Upto 300m 

### (984.252 ft) • Flight Systems Telemetry Data On Screen Display (OSD) - Yes • LED BacklitLCD Screen - Capacitive Multi-Touch 5.5" • Tactile (Vibrating) and Audible Feedback - Yes • Built-In LiPo BatteryVoltage I Capacity - 3.6V/5200mAh 18.72Wh • Charger - Auto-Charge Mode viaMicro-B USB Cable with AC to 5V DC USB Power Supply (Included)

24
##### 



Exhibit 10.8
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
CREDIT AGREEMENT
 Amendment US BIO DYERSVILLE, LLC, Borrower AGSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, PCA Agent
 RECITALS
 Credit Agreement
    AGREEMENT
  Amendments to Credit Agreement
 Section 5.02(i)
  Conditions to Effectiveness of this Amendment .




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties .
   Miscellaneous .
 Effect; Ratification
 Loan Documents
 Counterparts
 Severability
 GOVERNING LAW
 WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL




---



##### 








---



##### 



SIGNATURE PAGE TO
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
 BY AND BETWEEN
 US BIO DYERSVILLE, LLC,
 And
 AGSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, PCA, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
   BORROWER:
 US BIO DYERSVILLE, LLC
 /s/ Kelly S. Langley
By:
Kelly S. Langley

Its: Treasurer




---



##### 



SIGNATURE PAGE TO
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
 BY AND BETWEEN
 US BIO DYERSVILLE, LLC,
 And
 AGSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, PCA, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
   AGENT:
 AGSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, PCA,
 /s/ Mark SchmidtBy:
Mark SchmidtIts: Vice President




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 CONSENT AND REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY
    US BIOENERGY CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Kelly S. LangleyName:  Kelly S. LangleyIts:  Treasurer
EXHIBIT 21.1
 COMSYS IT Partners, Inc.
 List of Significant Subsidiaries
 Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction
    
    Trade NamesCOMSYS Services LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    COMSYSCOMSYS Information Technology Services, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    COMSYSEconometrix, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    EconometrixPlum Rhino Consulting, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    plumRHINOPraeos Technologies, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    PraeosPure Solutions, Inc.
    
    California
    
    Pure SolutionsTWC Group Consulting, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    TWCASET International Services Corporation
    
    Virginia
    
    ASET
# C_2007013EN.01000101.xml

| 19.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4320 — ONEX Corporation/AON Warranty Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 13/01)

On 17 November 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4320. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4320. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
## OEmRTMENTO F

. : iANSPORWIO N SERVE D NOVEMBE R2,201 0 ''' ' tHA I l(JN b U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N ^^"^'- ^ : J M T

- 3 U OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH E MATTERO F S I PIN GYE FA A DOCKE T NO . CPlOEAOO l 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S NO . FAA-2010-097 6

NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 2009EA190129 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r persons o n th e attache dServic e List .

Roijni e A . Yode r Chie f Administrativ e La w Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CPlOEAOOl l (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Robert H . London , Respondent' s Counse l La w Office s o f

Robert H . Londo n 955 0 Flai r

Drive , Suit e 30 1 E l Monte , C A 9173 1 TEL : 626-575-920 0 Leoni dTalisman , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

Regiona l Counse l Eastern Regio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : J 718-553-340 3 FAX: 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Building , Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202

- 366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s by U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n person or

b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
# L_2015177EN.01006001.xml

| 8.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 177/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 177/60

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 2006/100/EC of 20 November 2006 adapting certain Directives in the field of freedom of movement of persons, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 363 of 20 December 2006
  )

On page 214, Annex, Chapter V, point (h), table, columns headed ‘Country’/‘Plastic surgery Minimum period of training: 5 years’:

for:

‘United Kingdom’/‘Cirugía plástica’,

read:

‘United Kingdom’/‘Plastic surgery’.

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Transderm Laboratories Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, acting in the capacity of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer,
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





**SIGNATURE**
            
            **TITLE**
            
            **DATE**/s/
                Ronald Burghauser
              Ronald
                Burghauser
            
            Chief
                Financial
              Officer
            
            April
                12, 2007