alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          5

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                      386485
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              4431946
<ALLOWANCES>                                               (87449)
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           3877975
<PP&E>                                                   160916025
<DEPRECIATION>                                           (66348010)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           137530629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     21225570
<BONDS>                                                  148176701
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                               (31871642)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             137530629
<SALES>                                                   56913515
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          56913515
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             55978298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        18847367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (17912150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (17912150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            5675955
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (12236195)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0


</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1870 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on trichlorobenzene. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

trichlorobenzene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRICHLOROBENZENE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.33 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1870 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Davion Latrone Young, Appellant

No. 06

- 16

- 00147

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 26371 ).

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Jus tice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Da vion Latrone Young, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 26, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5758]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Site visit review of the Materials Research Science and 
Engineering Center (MRSEC) at New York University by the Division of 
Materials Research (DMR) <greek-i>1203.
    Dates and Times:

April 19, 2012; 7:45 a.m.-6:15 p.m.;
April 20, 2012; 8 a.m.-3:30 p.m.
    Place: New York University, New York, NY.
    Type of Meeting: Part open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Thomas Rieker, Program Director, Materials 
Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of 
Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4914.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the MRSEC at New York University.
    Agenda:

Thursday, April 19, 2012
    7:45 a.m.-4:30 p.m.: Open--Review of the MRSEC
    4:30 p.m.-6:15 p.m. Closed--Executive Session
Friday, April 20, 2012
    8 a.m.-9 a.m.: Closed--Executive session
    9 a.m.-10 a.m.: Open--Review of the MRSEC
    10 a.m.-3:30 p.m.: Closed--Executive Session, Draft and Review 
Report

    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the MRSEC. These 
matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552 b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 6, 2012.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-5758 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 03/03/2011 03:33 PM Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EPA's EGU MACT Rule

Hi Bob, Consistent with our EOs, attached is the handout from this meeting.

Regards, Cortney

-----Original Appointment----- From: Echols, Mabel E. Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 4:29 PM To: Echols, Mabel E.; Neyland, Kevin F.; Mancini, Dominic J.; Higgins, Cortney; Rackoff, Jonathan E.; Dick, John H.; Clark, Michael C.; Patel, Manisha; Levinson, Arik; Keohane, Nathaniel; Zichal, Heather R.; Bloom, Ron; jason.miller2@treasury.gov; tsirigotis.peter@epamail.epa.gov; wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov; culligan.kevin@epa.gov; Thundiyil.Karen@epamail.epa.gov; Bertrand.Charlotte@epamail.epa.gov; Lee, Amanda I.; Kymn, Christine J. Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EPA's EGU MACT Rule When: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 11:00 AM-11:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: Wilson Room, WHCC -- Room Correction

When: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 11:00 AM-11:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: Wilson Room, WHCC -- Room Correction

Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments.



### *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Linda Stuntz, Stuntz, Davis & Staffier has requested this meeting.
Sixth Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement



 Exhibit 10(ai)(6) 
 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO 
 PURCHASE & SALE AGREEMENT 
 THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT is dated as of this 20th day of December, 2006 between RICHARDSON ELECTRONICS, LTD., a
Delaware corporation (“Seller”) and TAB CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, an Illinois corporation (“Purchaser”). 
 RECITALS:

 WHEREAS, Seller is the owner of that certain real estate located within the City of Geneva, Kane County, Illinois, commonly known as 715
Hamilton Street, Geneva, Illinois and has executed a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated August 4, 2005 with Purchaser in the connection with the sale of the Property as defined therein to Purchaser (the “Purchase Agreement”); and

 WHEREAS, on December 16, 2005, January 31, 2006, February 17, 2006, June 7, 2006 and October 30,
2006, respectively, the parties executed the First, Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Amendments to Purchase and Sale Agreement and have agreed to further amend the Purchase Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, on December 6, 2006 Seller served upon the Purchaser a Notice of Default alleging Purchaser’s default in its meeting of obligations
under the Purchase Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties have resolved the disputes resulting in the above mentioned Notice of Default.

 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration,
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
 1. Seller hereby waives all allegations of default
against Purchaser described in Seller’s Notice of Default of December 6, 2006, contingent upon the following: 
 a.
Concurrent with its execution hereof, Purchaser shall execute a Direction to Chicago Title Insurance Company authorizing the directing release of the $70,000 corpus of the Earnest Money Escrow to Seller and, in addition, increase the Earnest Money
to a total of $100,000, said $30,000 increase to be forwarded directly to Seller, also concurrent with Purchaser’s execution hereof. 
 b. The Purchase Price set forth in the Purchase Agreement shall be increased from Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000) to Three Million Fifty Thousand Dollars ($3,050,000). 
 2. Purchaser agrees to the conditions set forth in Paragraph 1 above. 
 3. The Closing Date is hereby extended to December 29, 2006, time being of the essence. 







 4. Except as hereby modified the Purchase Agreement, as amended, remains in full force and effect.

 5. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, both of which when taken together shall constitute a single original. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Sixth Amendment as of the date and year first written above. 
  

									
	SELLER:	 		 	PURCHASER:
			
	Richardson Electronics, Ltd., a Delaware	 		 	TAB Construction Company, an Illinois
	corporation	 		 	corporation
					
	By:	 	/S/ EDWARD J. RICHARDSON	 		 	By:	 	/S/ TRACY BURNIDGE
	Title:	 	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President	 		 		 	Tracy Burnidge, President
Docket No: FAA

- 2016

- 0459 Dir ID: 2015

- NM

- 081

- AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Cont acted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 6/1/15

Regional Airline Association 6/1/15

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 6/1/15

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 6/1/15
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0433

IN THE PARENTING OF:

T.J.E.,

A Minor Child,

RACHEL RENE ERICKSON,

Petitioner and Appellant,

and

TRAVIS JOHN ERICKSON,

Respondent and Appellee.

MAR 1 6 2021

Bc..en Greenwood

Clerk of Suprerne Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Appellant has filed a motion for extension of time to file her opening brief in the

referenced matter.

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for extension is GRANTED. Appellant shall have

until April 13, 2021, within which to file her opening brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all parties of record.

DATED this I Lz, —day of March, 2021.

For the Court,

Chief Justice

03/16/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0433
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1863 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1863

        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Terrazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Terrazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERRAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.61 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Terrazole) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
THE STATE 

o~LASKA.,\ 

Deparanent Transportation 

Public Facilities 

GOVERNOR SEAN PARN 

November 8, 2012 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

.'.: t { 

Re: Essential Air Service at Gulkana, May Creek, and McCarthy, Alaska 

DOCKET DOT-OST-1995-492 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER 

P.O. Box 196900 

Anchorage. Alaska 99519-6900 

Main: 907.269.0730 

Fax: 907.269.0489 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the selection of an air carrier for service at 

Gulkana, May Creek, and McCarthy, Alaska. I am writing to express my strong support for the 

continuation of the Essential Air Service (EAS) program in Alaska and to emphasize the crucial 

access it provides to our remote communities. 

Due to the isolated location of these communities, EAS provides their only form of scheduled 

transportation, and they depend on scheduled air service for freight, passenger, medevac, access 

to hospital services, and mail service for basic necessities and economic welfare. While Gulkana 

is 190 miles and McCarthy is 305 miles from Anchorage by two-lane road, May Creek is not 

connected to the road system at all. 

The State of Alaska continues to assert that the local residents are generally best positioned to 

comment on particular schedules or air carriers, and therefore we think the community should 

provide comments to you on those specific areas. 

I respectfully urge US DOT to support and continue the EAS service for Gulkana, May Creek, 

and McCarthy, Alaska. 

Sincerely, 

Steven D. Hatter 

Deputy Commissioner- Aviation 

"Get Alaska Moving through service and inji·astructure."
# L_2006047EN.01003701.xml

| 17.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/37

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 280/2006

of 16 February 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 19th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 19th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 29,908 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 February 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 February 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 185, 16.7.2005, p. 3.

2

---
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                       IRIDIUM WORLD COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
 
                  COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER CLASS A COMMON SHARE
                        (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 PERIOD FROM
                                                              DECEMBER 12, 1996
                                                               (INCEPTION) TO
                                                              DECEMBER 31, 1996       1997
                                                              -----------------    ----------
<S>                                                           <C>                  <C>
Net loss applicable to Class A Common shares
Net loss....................................................         $--           $   18,834
                                                                     ---           ----------
Net loss applicable to Class A Common shares................         $--           $   18,834
                                                                     ===           ==========
AVERAGE NUMBER OF CLASS A COMMON SHARES:
Average number of Class A Common shares outstanding.........                        6,739,726
Diluted adjustments(2):
     Assumed exercise of options and warrants...............          --            1,507,712
                                                                     ===           ==========
Average number of Class A Common shares assumed to be
  outstanding, assuming dilution............................          --            8,247,438
                                                                     ===           ==========
NET LOSS PER CLASS A COMMON SHARE:
Basic(1)....................................................         $--           $     2.79
Diluted(2)..................................................         $--           $     2.28
</TABLE>
 
---------------
(1) The assumed exercise of options and warrants in periods of net loss are
    anti-dilutive and are not included in the computation and presentation of
    loss per Class A Common share.
 
(2) The assumed exercise of options and warrants are anti-dilutive but are
    included in the calculation of diluted loss per Class A Common share in
    accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 601 (a) (11).
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-567]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the 
Arts and Humanities.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), as part of its 
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a 
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and 
federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or 
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(A)]. This program 
helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired 
format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, 
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of 
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. 
Currently, the NEA is soliciting comments concerning revisions to 
existing information collection on arts activities funded through State 
Arts Assemblies and Regional Arts Organizations. A copy of the current 
information collection request can be obtained by contacting the office 
listed below in the address section of this notice.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the 
address section below on or before March 13, 2012. The NEA is 
particularly interested in comments which:
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity 
of the methodology and assumptions used;
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
    <bullet> Minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate 
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting 
electronic submissions of responses.

ADDRESSES: Sunil Iyengar, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 616, Washington, DC 20506-0001, 
telephone (202) 682-5424 (this is not a toll-free number), fax (202) 
682-5677.

Kathleen Edwards,
Director, Administrative Services, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2012-567 Filed 1-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P