alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Department of Labor and Industry, etc., Appellant, *v.*Unemployment Compensation Board of Review.

Argued November 19, 1941.

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Rhodes, Hirt and Kenworthey, JJ.

*’William Hammond,*with him *David R. Perry,*Special Deputy Attorney General, and *Claude T. Reno,*Attorney General, for appellant.

*R. Carlyle Fee,*Asst.' Special Deputy Attorney General, *Charles R. Davis,*Special Deputy Attorney General, and *Claude T. Reno,*Attorney General, for appellee, were, not heard.

March 4, 1942:

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

The Unemployment Compensation Law (Act of December 5, 1936, P. L. 1937, p. 2897) provides in section 510, “In any appeal to the Superior Court the findings of the board or referee, as the case may be, as to the facts, if- supported by the evidence and in the *250absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and in such cases the jurisdiction of the Court shall be confined to questions of law.”

The referee found that the claimant was laid off by her employer, acting through its forelady, on December 8,1939, at a time when she was able and willing to work. The board, on appeal, affirmed the findings. They are supported by substantial competent evidence and are conclusive on us.

Her. leaving work was therefore not voluntary. See *Labor & Industry Dept. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review,*133 Pa. Superior Ct. 518, 521, 3 A. 2d 211; and she was entitled to unemployment compensation.

The decision of the board is affirmed and the appeal is dismissed.
# L_2006158EN.01002001.xml

| 10.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 158/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 158/20

---

COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2006/407/CFSP

of 7 June 2006

amending and extending Joint Action 2005/643/CFSP on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Aceh (Indonesia) (Aceh Monitoring Mission — AMM)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 14 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 27 February 2006 the Council adopted Joint Action 2006/202/CFSP amending and extending Joint Action 2005/643/CFSP on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Aceh (Indonesia) (Aceh Monitoring Mission — AMM) (1) for a period of three months until 15 June 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 27 February 2006 the Council adopted Joint Action 2006/202/CFSP amending and extending Joint Action 2005/643/CFSP on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Aceh (Indonesia) (Aceh Monitoring Mission — AMM) (1) for a period of three months until 15 June 2006.

| (2) | On 5 May 2006 the Government of Indonesia invited the EU to extend the mandate of the AMM for a further period of three months until 15 September 2006. The Free Aceh Movement (GAM) also indicated its support for such an extension of the mission. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 5 May 2006 the Government of Indonesia invited the EU to extend the mandate of the AMM for a further period of three months until 15 September 2006. The Free Aceh Movement (GAM) also indicated its support for such an extension of the mission.

| (3) | On 11 May 2006, the Political and Security Committee reiterated its support for the peace process in Aceh and expressed support for the recommendation of the Secretary-General/High Representative to extend the mandate of the AMM for a further period of three months. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 11 May 2006, the Political and Security Committee reiterated its support for the peace process in Aceh and expressed support for the recommendation of the Secretary-General/High Representative to extend the mandate of the AMM for a further period of three months.

| (4) | Joint Action 2005/643/CFSP should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Joint Action 2005/643/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

Joint Action 2005/643/CFSP is hereby amended as follows:

in the second paragraph of Article 16 of Joint Action 2005/643/CFSP, the date shall be replaced by the following:

‘
  15 September 2006
  ’.

Article 2

The financial reference amount intended to cover the additional expenditure related to the mission for the period 16 June 2006 to 15 September 2006 shall be EUR 300 000.

Article 3

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Article 4

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 7 June 2006.

For the Council

The President

K.-H. GRASSER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 71, 10.3.2006, p. 57.

1

---
o 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Washington,D.C. f ttOElVFrj 

Rushmore Helicopters, Inc. ^CAR/N G DOCKE T 

o o Q '^ 

feg5,E? ^ FAA DOCKET NO. CP10GL0002 

^•'"'' P-:^>=' "^ (EIR 2009-GL-27-0021) : 

(Civil Penalty Action) r\7 3 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin f f\H 

REQUES T FO R SUBPOENA 

The hearing in this matter is currently scheduled for April 27, 28, and 29, 2011 in the Conference 

Room, B16, United States Courthouse, 515 Ninth Street, Room 224, Rapid City, SD 57701. 

Agency Counsel requests that a subpoena be issued for the following individual: 

Robert Leroy Leffert 

1427FettermanDr. 

Colorado Springs CO 80915 

Mr. Leffert was the pilot who operated the aircraft involved in this matter. He was personally 

aware and can testify of the missing fuel cap and of the fact that duct tape was used to cover the 

fuel port in place of the missing cap. Further, he can testify regarding the operation of the 

affi^ft in this condition. 

Respectfully submitted this 4^ day of March 2011. 

:hris G. Zv 

Senior AttomE 

Federal Aviation Administratibh 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

Phone: (847)294-7713 

Fax: (847) 294-7498 
.y 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Request for Subpoena has been mailed this 4"' day of March 

2011, by First Class Mail, to: 

Original and One Copy: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilber Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

One Copy each to: 

Mr. Michael Jacob, President or CEO 

Rushmore Helicopters, Inc. 

24564 Highway 16/385 

Custer, SD 57730 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Telephone: (202)366-2139 

Fax: (202)366-7536 

Dated this 4*^ day of March 2011. 

Tammy Gardner 

Legal Technician 

FAA Great Lakes
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Frank C. Spencer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cogdell Spencer Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under the Company’s supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report the Company’s conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on the Company’s mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: November 14, 2006 By:  /s/Frank C. Spencer   Name:  Frank C. Spencer   Title:  Chief Executive Officer   
26
10-Q Exhibit 32.2: Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iShares Silver Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Latham, Chief Financial Officer of Barclays Global Investors International Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2007           
|                             
|/s/    Michael A. Latham     
|Michael A. Latham *          
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Latham is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors International Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                             IRIDIUM OPERATING LLC
 
                   (A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF IRIDIUM LLC)
                (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                ($ IN THOUSANDS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          PERIODS FOLLOWING INITIAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION DATE
                                                                       ---------------------------------------------------------
                                      YEAR ENDED                       JULY 29, 1993 TO          DECEMBER 31,
                                     DECEMBER 31,   JANUARY 1, 1993      DECEMBER 31,     ---------------------------
                                         1992       TO JULY 28, 1993         1993          1994      1995      1996       1997
                                     ------------   ----------------   ----------------   -------   -------   -------   --------
<S>                                  <C>            <C>                <C>                <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed charges:
  Capitalized Interest..............        --               --                 --             --        --    28,127    163,747
  Portion of rent expense
    representative of interest(1)...        --               --                 54            264       342       398      2,607
                                        ------           ------             ------        -------   -------   -------   --------
        Total fixed charges.........        --               --                 54            264       342    28,525    166,354
                                        ======           ======             ======        =======   =======   =======   ========
Earnings:
  Loss before income taxes..........    (8,773)          (5,309)            (6,751)       (13,309)  (21,961)  (69,009)  (293,401)
  Fixed charges, less capitalized
    interest........................        --               --                 54            264       342       398      2,607
                                        ------           ------             ------        -------   -------   -------   --------
    Earnings adjusted for fixed
      charges.......................    (8,773)          (5,309)            (6,697)       (13,045)  (21,619)  (68,611)  (290,744)
                                        ======           ======             ======        =======   =======   =======   ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed
  charges...........................        --               --                 --             --        --        --         --
Deficiency in earnings to cover
  fixed charges.....................     8,773            5,309              6,751         13,309    21,961    97,136    457,148
</TABLE>
 
---------------
(1) One-third of rent expense is deemed to be representative of interest.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6754

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KELVIN JEROD HOLMAN, a/k/a J

- Five , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg

. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. ( 5:04

- cr - 00964

- MBS

- 2 )

Submitted : October 31, 2019 Decided: November 5, 2019

Before MOTZ and KING , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kelvin Jerod Holman , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kelvin Jerod Holman appeals the distri ct court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018 (“First Step Act”), Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222, which permits a district court to impose
a reduced sentence for defenda nts convicted of covered offenses as if certain provisions of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (“FSA”), Pub. L. No. 111

- 220, §§ 2

- 3, 124 Stat. 2372, 2372, were in effect at the time the covered offense was committed. To qualify as a covered offense under t he F irst S tep A ct , the conviction at issue had to have been modified by
S ection 2 or 3 of the FSA. Holman pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute 5 kilograms or more of cocaine and 50 grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), 846 (20 06 ) . Although Section 2 of the FSA increased the drug quantities necessary to trigger the mandatory minimum sentences in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1) for crack cocaine offenses, it “left the statutory mi nimum sentences for powder cocaine in place.” United States v. Black , 737 F.3d 280, 282 (4th Cir. 2013). Because the First Step Act did not alter Holman’s statutory sentencing range, we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.2

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Richard A.
Wisot, the chief financial officer of Transpro, Inc. (the
"issuer"), does hereby certify that the
report on Form 10-K accompanying this certification (the
"report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the issuer.

/s/ Richard A. Wisot
 Richard A.
Wisot

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(chief financial officer) Transpro, Inc. March 28,
2005

---
EXHIBIT 23




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:





(1)
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-155763) of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.,





(2)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-38929) pertaining to the Meadowbrook Insurance Group 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan,





(3)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-103453) pertaining to the Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan, and





(4)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-163602) pertaining to the Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. 2009 Equity Compensation Plan;





of our reports dated March 16, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Detroit, Michigan


March 16, 2011
### Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft Language under

EO12866 Interagency Review. Subject to Further Policy Review. Comments on EPA NPRM, Implementation of the 2008 NAAQS for Ozone Page 8, in the second to last paragraph

– The last sentence seems out of date since EPA has issued their 120 day

letters alread y. Page 11, in the paragraph at the top of the page

– The last sentence reads as if EPA will not be considering an y 2009
- 2011 m onitoring data when it makes it final designations. If some areas did submit 2009
- 2011 data prior to EPA’s rele ase of their 120 day letters, this should be clarified. Page 11, in the last paragraph before D

– If EPA has already issued their 120 day lette rs, suggest this paragraph be updated to reflect where EPA is currentl y in the designation process. Also, the last sentence does not seems to be consistent with what is stated on page 20 regarding EPA’s intent to complete designations no later than May 31 , 2012. Page 12, last sentence in the paragraph before Section III, suggest add ing “including general conformity” after “... for other purposes” Page 20
- 23

– EPA proposed 2 options for establishing the maximum attainment dates. T he commenter suggests opt ion 2 (attainment date specified as a certain number of y ears from the end of the calendar year in which an area’s nonattainm ent designation is effective.) may provide greater certainty

to transportation agencies in preparing for their conformity analy sis, as the attainment y ear is one of the anal ys is y ears. This option may eliminate the uncertaint y and confusion of which 3 consecutive ozone seasons should be considered in determining the attainment y ear, especially if the effective date of the designation s is in the middle of the ozone season. Starting on Page 23

– Section IV. Revoking the 97 ozone NAAQS for transportation conformity
. One commenter suggested that EPA also provide more information regarding the transition from the 97 ozone NAAQS to the 2 008 NAAQS, especially on issues related to how conformity

applies for the 97 standard during the 1 y ear grace period and once the 97 standard is revoked. It is appropriate to include this ty pe of information in this rulemaking for review/comment as opposed to future implementation rules mostly addressing other issues. Page 23

– Section IV. Other commenters suggested it would be appropriate to expand on transition and implementation in the forthcoming implementation rule. Page 24, The commenter re commend s to change the last sentence in the first paragraph (before Section A.) to something similar to the last sentence in the paragraph before Section III on page 12, which is more definitive. Page 28

– In the second line on the page, suggest deleting the word “either” since the sentence does not present two options or ideas.

### Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft Language under

EO12866 Interagency Review. Subject to Further Policy Review.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1902 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1902

          To reduce temporarily the duty on Corvus herbicide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

  Mr. Roberts introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To reduce temporarily the duty on Corvus herbicide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORVUS HERBICIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Mixtures            1.9%         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          containing                                                         31/2011.......
                          thiencarbazone-
                          methyl (methyl 4-
                          [(4,5-dihydro-3-
                          methoxy-4-methyl-
                          5-oxo-1H-1,2,4-
                          triazol-1-
                          yl)carbonylsulfam
                          oyl]-5-
                          methylthiophene-3-
                          carboxylate),
                          isoxaflutole (5-
                          cyclopropyl-1,2-
                          oxazol-4-
                          yl)(a,a,a-
                          trifluoro-2-mesyl-
                          p-tolyl)methanone
                          and
                          cyprosulfamide (N-
                          ({4-
                          [(cyclopropylamin
                          o)carbonyl]phenyl
                          }sulfonyl)-2-
                          methoxybenzamide)
                          (CAS Nos. 317815-
                          83-1, 141112-29-
                          0, 221667-31-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3808.93.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```