alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p.1 

OAR Box 1132 

Prepped by Candice Davis 

Document Number: 

40) ll-F-4 

Docket Number: 

A-86-03 

Printed 4/18/2008 2:24:46 PM Sheet 40 of 122 
P.2 

'istt «Y:X.r« Telecopier 7020 i 7-10-89 i 4:2BP« i 2023953746^ 8 M M««i» 2 

Diesel Fuel Quality Comment 

EPA estimates the potential for reduced engine wear from 

low-sulfur fuel under three alternative truck manufacturer/owner 

response scenarios: (1) extended oil change intervals with no 

increase in engine life, (2) no change in oil change intervals 

but an increase in engine life, and (3) no change in oil change 

intervals with increases in both engine and total vehicle life, 

EPA has no data to determine which scenario is most likely to 

occur. The annual benefits of decreased engine wear in year 2010 

are estimated at between $400 million and $3.7 billion; fuel 

costs, however, are estimated to increase between $530 million 

and $1.3 billion. 

Based on these estimates, the annual net benefit accruing 

directly to truck owners from reduced engine wear alone could be 

over $2 billion. Under this scenario, truck owners would be 

willing to pay over $2 billion more per year for low-sulfur 

diesel fuel than it would cost refiners to produce it. To the 

extent that these estimates accurately reflect the effects of the 

proposed regulation, there must be a reason why such large 

potential net gains would not materialize, if-EPA vere to take r.o 

action. EPA seeks dominant on this issue* 

one possible explanation is that there are significant costs to 

truck owners of determining the actual effects of reduced sulfur 

fuels on engine wear. Since the effects take place inside 

engines over fairly long periods of time, it may not be easy to 

observe, isolate, and measure the effects of reduced sulfur 

fuels, if these information costs are sufficiently large, they 

could outweigh the potential net benefits of a move to low-sulfur 

fuel resulting from market forces alone. Under these 

circumstances, the information costs would effectively prevent 

the introduction of low-sulfur fuel. .f^ 

w 

—. i I 

EPA AJRJ>OCKH L 
P.3 

"SN T BYJXerox Telecopier 7020 ; 7-10-89 ; 4:28PM ; 

2023953746- 374 8368\* 

TELX7AX TRANSMITTAL COVER 8HBET 

Please Deliver The following Page(s) Tot 

Cityi ^__ 

Telefax Humbert J3/3- &&JP— 4*3*&P* <P?^s 

&TS f— r? 74'- Pr?<£ J>-

Division* dZ&A- ; 

Total number of Pages ^y^ including cover sheet*. 

Zf you do not reoeive all pages; please call back 

as soon as possible to (202) 315-3084* 

To transmit to us, oall (202) 395-3749* 

Transmitted byi &&& # 

Datet "%/^/^Time Sent*
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1903 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3-Dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol and 1,3- 

Dimethylpyrazol-5-one. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. ROBERTS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3-Dimethyl-1Hpyrazol-5-ol and 1,3-Dimethylpyrazol-5-one. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,3-DIMETHYL-1H-PYRAZOL-5-OL AND 1,3- 

4 DIMETHYLPYRAZOL-5-ONE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1903 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1,3-Dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol 

(CAS No. 5203–77–0); or 

1,3-dimethylpyrazol-5-one 

(CAS No. 2749–59–9) (provided for in subheading 

2933.19.90) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-033-AD

Costs:

Labor per airplane (3 work hours x $85/hour) $ 255

Parts per airplane $ + 0

Cost per airplane $ 255

Number of U.S.-registered airplanes 

x

 601

Total fleet cost $153,255

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5529]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Farm Service Agency


Funding for the Conservation Loan Program; Farm Loan Programs

AGENCY: Farm Service Agency, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces that the Farm Service Agency (FSA) now 
has funding for and is accepting guaranteed loan applications for the 
Conservation Loan (CL) Program. Due to a lack of program funding for 
direct CLs, direct loan applications are not being accepted at this 
time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Connie Holman; telephone: (202) 690-
0756. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for 
communication (Braille, large print, audio tape, etc.) should contact 
the USDA Target Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 13, 2011, FSA published a notice in 
the Federal Register (76 FR 27986) announcing that FSA was no longer 
accepting direct or guaranteed loan applications for the CL Program 
because of a lack of funding.
    On November 18, 2011, FSA received an appropriation to fund 
guaranteed CLs under the Consolidated and Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2012 (Pub. L. 112-55). Therefore, FSA has resumed 
accepting guaranteed loan applications for the CL Program.
    FSA is not accepting direct CL applications as no new funding has 
been appropriated at this time. Conservation projects may still be 
funded through FSA's direct Farm Ownership and Farm Loan Operating 
programs for eligible applicants who do not qualify for the Guaranteed 
CL Program.
    Potential guaranteed loan applicants should contact a lender. 
Potential direct loan applicants should contact their FSA state or 
county office; office locations can be found at http://www.fsa.usda.gov.

    Signed on March 1, 2012.
Bruce Nelson,
Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 2012-5529 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 4, 2019

No. 04-17-00811-CV

Richard O. WEED, Timothy A. Weed, and Rees R. Oliver, III,

Appellants

v.

FROST BANK, Individually and as Independent Executor of the Estate of Rees R. Oliver, Jr. 

Deceased,

Appellees

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PC-2024A

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice1

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Beth Watkins and the Law Office of Beth Watkins d/b/a Watkins Law d/b/a Watkins 

Appeals PLLC has filed an Agreed Motion to Substitute Counsel, seeking to withdraw from 

representation of appellants and to substitute Shannon K. Dunn and the Law Office of Shannon 

Dunn, PLLC as lead counsel for appellants. The Agreed Motion to Substitute Counsel is 

GRANTED. 

It is ORDERED that Shannon K. Dunn and the Law Office of Shannon Dunn, PLLC are

substituted as lead counsel for Appellants Richard O. Weed, Timothy A. Weed, and Rees R. 

Oliver, III. It is further ORDERED that Beth Watkins and the Law Office of Beth Watkins d/b/a 

Watkins Law d/b/a Watkins Appeals PLLC are withdrawn from representing appellants. 

The Clerk of this Court is directed to remove the following e-mail addresses from the eservice circulation list in this cause: 

Beth@WatkinsAppeals.com

Beth.Watkins@WatkinsAppeals.com, and 

 

1 Not participating
Stephanie@WatkinsAppeals.com.

The Clerk of this Court is further directed to add to the e-service circulation list in this 

cause the following email address: Shannon@ShannonDunnLaw.com.

It is so ORDERED on January 4, 2019.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 KEITH E. HOTTLE,

 Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 20
          - [REG-112196-07]
          - RIN 1545-BH64

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking.

# SUMMARY:

This document cancels a public hearing on proposed regulations (REG-112196-07), providing guidance respecting the election to use the alternate valuation method under section 2032 of the Internal Revenue Code.

# DATES:

The public hearing originally scheduled for March 9, 2012 at 10 a.m., is cancelled.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

LaNita Van Dyke of the Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedures and Administration), at (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Friday, November 18, 2011 (76 FR 71491), announced that a public hearing was scheduled for March 9, 2012, at 10 a.m., in the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue Service Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is under section 2032 of the Internal Revenue Code.                

The public comment period for these regulations expired on February 16, 2012. The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing, instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of Monday, February 27, 2012, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for March 9, 2012, is cancelled.

LaNita Van Dyke,

Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, Procedures and Administration.

[FR Doc. 2012-4861 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                            |                                           |                             |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| June                  15,                  2007 |                                                | /s/                  Tai-ming Ou |
|                                            | Tai-ming OuChairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

----
### NO. ••• . . IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, TEXAS JOSE DIAZ PEREZ Petitioner,

v. THE STATE OF.TEXAS 

# RECEIVEDIN APPEALS 

## JUN262Cb 

## FILEDIN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS JUN262015 AhfilArnsta nierk ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS, COA#12-14-00116-CR, TRIAL COURT.THE SECOND JUDICIAL DIS TRICT,CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS NO.18373. MOTION FOR.EXTENSION OF.TIME TO FILE THE PETITION FOR DISCRETION ARY-REVIEW

Petitioner's conviction was affirmed on May 29, 2015. Appellate Counsel has informed Petitioner, that he will withdraw from the 

### appeal. Petitioner requires time to attempt to retainprivate counsel, or to research and prepare and file a pro se PDR. In these regards,.Petitioner respectfully request an extension up 

### to and including August 29, 2015 to file his PDRwith this Court. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED June 9. 2015 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I mailed a true and correct copy of the fore 

### going to the Cherokee CountyDistrict Attorney> West 6th Street, Rusk, Texas 75785 via U.S. mail. June 9, 2015
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00413-CR

WILLIAM ROGER MCGLOTHLIN,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1269183D)

May 13, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. The trial court’s judgment is modified to delete 

$175 from the reparations so that Appellant William Roger McGlothlin is obligated to 

pay only $275 in reparations. It is ordered that the trial court’s judgment is affirmed as 

modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
Name: Antonio Jorge Del Grosso.

Address:

4252 Prairie View Dr 

Sarasota Florida 34232

Contact:

Telephone: 941 322 4676

E-mail: angelwingaviation@gmail.com

Section of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) from which an exemption is seek:

Title 14 CFR 47.65

Extent of relief which is seeking and the reason the relief is seek:

Eligibility 

I’m the president of Angel Wing Aviation Inc. This is an American company which is engaged on 

the sales of used aircrafts. I’m Brazilian and not-citizen of United States of American and it 

makes me not eligible to apply for the Dealer’s Aircraft Registration Certificate.

How the request would benefit the public as a whole:

With the exemption granted and eligible to apply for the Dealer’s Aircraft Registration 

Certificate, I will be able to continue trading planes between USA and Brazil, which is good for 

both countries.

Reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption would provide a 

level of safety at least equal to the existing rule:

There is no reason in this process that could affect safety. The reason for the exemption

requirement is because the applicant is a non-citizen of United States of America.

Summary of the rule which is applied an exemption:

Title 14 CFR § 47.65

Eligibility.

To be eligible for a Dealer's Aircraft Registration Certificate, AC Form 8050-6, the applicant must 

have an established place of business in the United States, must be substantially engaged in

manufacturing or selling aircraft, and must be a citizen of the United States, as defined by 49 

U.S.C. 40102 (a)(15).

Brief of the exemption which I seek:

I’m Brazilian, president of the Angel Wing Aviation Inc., an American company.

The company makes trade with Brazilian customers who buy used aircraft in the United States 

of America.

The Brazilian aviation agency, ANAC, is requesting the Dealer’s Aircraft Registration Certificate

for the import process of an aircraft since December 2012. I need this exemption to be eligible 

for a Dealer’s Aircraft Registration Certificate for my company.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1428

VERNON A. GUION, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. GORDAN R. ENGLAND, Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cv-00070-F)

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 16, 2008

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vernon A. Guion, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Kelly Michele Perry, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Vernon A. Guion appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the Appellee and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Guion v. England , No. 4:06- cv-00070-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1051-1052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-88]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2011-0115]

General Conference Committee of the National Poultry Improvement 
Plan; Meeting

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are giving notice of a meeting of the General Conference 
Committee of the National Poultry Improvement Plan.

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 25, 2012, from 1:30 p.m. to 
5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Georgia World Congress 
Center, 285 Andrew Young International Boulevard NW., Atlanta, GA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. C. Stephen Roney, Senior 
Coordinator, National Poultry Improvement Plan, VS, APHIS, 1506 
Klondike Road, Suite 300, Conyers, GA 30094; (770) 922-3496.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The General Conference Committee (the 
Committee) of the National Poultry Improvement Plan (NPIP), 
representing cooperating State agencies and poultry industry members, 
serves an essential

[[Page 1052]]

function by acting as liaison between the poultry industry and the 
Department in matters pertaining to poultry health.
    Topics for discussion at the upcoming meeting include:
    1. Use of performance standards in the NPIP regulations.
    2. The Food and Drug Administration's egg safety rule and NPIP 
salmonella testing equivalency update.
    3. Compartmentalization.
    4. 2012 Biennial Conference.
    The meeting will be open to the public. However, due to time 
constraints, the public will not be allowed to participate in the 
discussions during the meeting. Written statements on meeting topics 
may be filed with the Committee before or after the meeting by sending 
them to the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 
Written statements may also be filed at the meeting. Please refer to 
Docket No. APHIS-2011-0115 when submitting your statements.
    This notice of meeting is given pursuant to section 10 of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of January 2012.
Gregory L. Parham,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-88 Filed 1-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1865 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1865

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bifenazate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bifenazate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BIFENAZATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.61 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Bifenazate) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 60873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23986]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS13-23]

Appraisal Subcommittee Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in closed session:

DATES: October 9, 2013.

ADDRESSES: 400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20024.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
Location: OCC--400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20024
Date: October 9, 2013
Time: Immediately following the ASC open session
Status: Closed

Matters To Be Considered

September 11, 2013 minutes--Closed Session
Preliminary discussion of State Compliance Reviews

    Dated: September 26, 2013.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-23986 Filed 10-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
```