alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.0

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Equitable Financial Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by this Report.


                                      By:  /s/ Richard L. Harbaugh
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Richard L. Harbaugh
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           May 12, 2006


                                       By: /s/ Kim E. Marco
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Kim E. Marco
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           May 12, 2006
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1812 

To suspend temporarily the duty on DMDPA. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 20, 2009 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on DMDPA. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DMDPA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4′-Methoxy-2,2′,4-trimethyl 

diphenylamine (CAS No. 

41374–20–3) (provided for in 

subheading 2922.29.61) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1812 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
From: Susan Miller [mailto:SMiller@bia.org]

Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 2:13 PM

To: Nizich, Sharon

Subject: Accepted: Discuss startup/shutdown work practices for Brick industry

When: Thursday, June 25, 2015 1:00 PM-2:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & 

Canada)

Where: RTP-Line-541-1591/Phone-Line/RTP-Conf-Bridge; RTP-D201-Max40/RTP-Bldg-D

Terry, Garth and I will all be in the same room on this day, so this should work well.

I will be sending you some other info in the meantime- we think we are understanding why some of 

those DLAs made it high on your list- and they should NOT be there...

susan

Susan J Miller

Vice President, Environment, Health & Safety

Brick Industry Association

311 South Academy Street

Cary, North Carolina 27511

919 380-2191

smiller@bia.org

When you talk, you are only repeating what you already know; but when you listen, you may learn 

something new. 

-Dalai Lama
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 12760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5132]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0369; Airspace Docket No. 11-AEA-07]


Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Wilkes-Barre, PA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal 
Register on July 1, 2011, establishing Class E airspace at Wilkes-
Barre/Wyoming Valley Airport, Wilkes-Barre, PA, is being withdrawn. 
Controlled airspace already exists for area airports under this city 
designator. A new proposal amending the existing airspace will be 
submitted under a separate rulemaking.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC March 2, 2012, the proposed rule published 
July 1, 2011 (76 FR 38585), is withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Horrocks, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On July 1, 2011, a NPRM was published in the Federal Register 
establishing Class E airspace at Wilkes-Barre, PA, to accommodate new 
standard instrument approach procedures for Wilkes-Barre/Wyoming Valley 
Airport, Wilkes-Barre, PA (76 FR 38585). Subsequent to publication the 
FAA found that Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above 
the surface currently exists for Wilkes-Barre, PA, with the primary 
airport being Wilkes-Barre/Scranton International Airport. To avoid 
confusion this proposed rule is being withdrawn and another rulemaking 
will be forthcoming adding Wilkes-Barre/Wyoming Valley Airport to the 
current city designator, Wilkes-Barre, PA.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical 
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance 
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and 
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to 
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no 
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an 
environmental assessment

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Withdrawal

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Notice 
of Proposed Rulemaking, as published in the Federal Register of July, 
1, 2011 (76 FR 38585) (FR Doc. 2011-16664), is hereby withdrawn.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on February 15, 2012.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2012-5132 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; DSR member conflict applications.                     

*Date:*                         March 15, 2012.                     

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                     

*Contact Person:*                        Jayalakshmi Raman, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, One Democracy Plaza Room 670, Bethesda, MD 20892-4878, 301-594-2904,                         *ramanj@mail.nih.gov*.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 21, 2012. 

Jennifer S. Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-4537 Filed 2-24-12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alfredo Guevara, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), rendered May 17, 1989, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court’s *Sandoval*ruling, permitting the prosecutor to inquire as to the nature of two prior convictions and as to the underlying facts of two other convictions, deprived him of the opportunity to testify and deprived him of a fair trial.

We disagree. It is well settled that "the exclusion of prior *559convictions is largely, if not completely, a matter of discretion which rests with the trial court” *(People v Shields,*46 NY2d 764, 765; *see, People v Duffy,*36 NY2d 258, *amended*36 NY2d 857, *cert denied*423 US 861). In determining the extent to which an accused may be cross-examined concerning previous convictions "[t]he People’s interest in exploring the veracity of a witness, including an accused, must be balanced against the risk that the presumption that a defendant is innocent may go by the board solely because of the jury’s natural tendency to conclude, despite limiting instructions, that a defendant who has committed previous crimes is either the kind of person likely to have committed the crime charged or is deserving of punishment in any event” *(People v Davis,*44 NY2d 269, 274). The record in this case establishes that the trial court weighed the probative value of each conviction against its prejudicial effect and properly exercised its discretion in making the *Sandoval*rulings.

Finally, we find that the remarks made by the prosecutor during the summation did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Fiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.28


SYNOPSYS, INC.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS


·                  Cash:


·                  Annual
retainer: $125,000 per year.


·                  Per
meeting fees for Audit Committee members only, up to a maximum of four meetings
per year:


·                  $2,000
per Audit Committee meeting for regular members


·                  $4,000
per Audit Committee meeting attended for the Chairperson


·                  Equity:
pursuant to the 2005 Non-Employee Directors Equity Incentive Plan (the
Directors Plan), in fiscal 2006, each director is eligible to receive equity
compensation as follows:


·                  Any
new director receives an option for 30,000 shares, vesting in equal annual
installments on the date preceding each of the first four annual meetings of
stockholders following the grant date, assuming continued service.


·                  Each
continuing director who is reelected at an annual meeting of stockholders
receives either (1) an option grant
(with the number of shares determined so that the aggregate “fair value” of the
option, calculated using the option pricing model used to estimate the value of
compensatory stock options in our financial statements, would equal the annual
cash retainer then paid to non-employee Board members) or (2) a restricted
stock grant (with the number of shares subject to the award determined so that
the fair market value of the restricted stock grant on the date of grant would
equal the annual cash retainer then paid to non-employee Board members). The
option grant or restricted stock vests in a series of 36 successive equal
monthly installments from the grant date, assuming continued service.
2012 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

11-13-2012

Roberto Santos;v. David Bush

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 12-2963

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2012 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Roberto Santos;v. David Bush" (2012). 2012 Decisions. Paper 178.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012/178
NOT PRECEDENTIAL 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 12-2963

____________

ROBERTO SANTOS,

Appellant

v.

DAVID L. BUSH; KAREN BALICKI

___________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. Civ. No. 09-cv-02018)

District Judge: Noel L. Hillman

__________________________________

Submitted for Possible Dismissal 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

or Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

October 25, 2012

Before: SLOVITER, VANASKIE and WEIS, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: November 6, 2012)

____________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

____________

It appears that footnote number 2 of the opinions issued on November 6, 2012 was not 

complete. The complete text of footnote number 2 is as follows:
Several other psychiatrists employed by the DOC, other than Dr. Bush, 

evaluated Santos at various times and observed similar symptoms and made 

the same diagnosis of psychosis.

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that an amended opinion shall be issued. The original 

filing date of the opinion will not be altered. The judgment is not impacted by the 

amendment.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: November 13, 2012
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                                  RomTech, Inc.
                          Computation of Loss Per Share

                                                         Years ended June 30,

                                                        1996            1995
                                                        ----            ----
Net loss                                             ($2,998,480)   ($  586,562)
                                                     ===========    ===========

Common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
    Weighted average common shares outstanding
       represented by the shares received by the
       stockholders of AOMC in connection with
       the reverse acquisition, and recorded as a
       recapitalization of the previously
       outstanding common stock of AOMC. Such
       shares have been retroactively restated to
       reflect the effect of the recapitalization
       for all periods presented                       1,575,000      1,575,000

    Weighted  average  common  shares  outstanding
       represented by the shares received by the
       stockholders and holders of convertible
       subordinated debt of VRLI in connection
       with the merger. Such shares have been
       retroactively restated to reflect the
       effect of the recapitalization for all
       periods presented                               1,284,440      1,284,440

    Weighted average common shares outstanding
       of the Company at the time of the merger
       with AOMC and shares issued in connection
       with the IPO and the exercise of warrants       2,395,112

    Additional shares  assumed to be outstanding
       resulting from the exercise of the
       warrants received by the stockholders of
       AOMC in connection with the reverse
       acquisition (computed using the treasury
       stock method)                                            (1)     354,166
                                                     -----------    -----------
                                                       5,254,552      3,213,606
                                                     ===========    ===========

Net loss per common and common equivalent share      ($     0.57)   ($     0.18)
                                                     ===========    ===========

(1) Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commssion,
common equivalent shares relating to stock options and warrants issued during
the twelve months prior to a planned initial public offering are included
whether or not they are anti-dilutive.
Exhibit
32.2
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Wauwatosa Holdings (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard C. Larson, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
   (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
   
   /s/ Richard C.
Larson
 Richard
C. Larson
 Chief
Financial Officer
 May 9,
2008
   A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Wauwatosa Holdings, Inc. and will be
retained by Wauwatosa Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of Open Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the following meeting of the aforementioned subcommittee will be held. (Parent Committee is: Board of Advisors to the Presidents of the Naval Postgraduate School and the Naval War College). This meeting will be open to the public.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 25, 2012, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. and on Thursday, April 26, 2012, from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. Pacific Time Zone.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Naval Postgraduate School, Herrmann Hall, 1 University Circle, Didactic Room #W410, Monterey, CA.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Jaye Panza, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943-5001, telephone number 831-656-2514.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the meeting is to elicit the advice of the Board on the Naval Service's Postgraduate Education Program and the collaborative exchange and partnership between the Naval Post Graduate School (NPS) and the Air Force Institute of Technology. The board examines the effectiveness with which the NPS is accomplishing its mission. To this end, the board will inquire into the curricula; instruction; physical equipment; administration; state of morale of the student body, faculty, and staff; fiscal affairs; and any other matters relating to the operation of the NPS as the board considers pertinent. Individuals without a DoD government Common Access Card card require an escort at the meeting location. For access, information, or to send written comments regarding the NPS Board of Advisors contact Ms. Jaye Panza, Designated Federal Officer, Naval Postgraduate School, 1 University Circle, Monterey, CA 93943-5001 or by fax 831-656-3145 by April 6, 2012.

Dated: February 28, 2012.

J.M. Beal

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate Generals Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-5350 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Friend, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered November 15, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Prior to the entry of his guilty plea, and as part of the plea agreement, the defendant withdrew all motions, decided or undecided. Although this did not constitute a waiver of his right to appeal from the judgment and sentence rendered upon his plea of guilty, the defendant is now foreclosed from raising on appeal any questions concerning the County Court’s rulings, including those which would otherwise have been reviewable pursuant to CPL 710.70 (2) *(see, People v Andrews,*146 AD2d 787; *People v Jackson,*142 AD2d 689, 690; *see also, People v Taylor,*65 NY2d 1). In any event, we conclude that all of the defendant’s contentions with respect to the County Court’s rulings lack merit. In addition, since the defendant received the sentence he was promised in accordance with the negotiated plea bargain, he has no basis to complain that it was excessive *(see, People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Kooper, J. P., Harwood, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.