alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w14



 






EXHIBIT 10.14




Third Amendment to Employment Agreement of Robert L. Belk



This agreement, effective upon your signature below, will serve to amend your Employment
Agreement of May 1, 2000, as amended on December 1, 2004 and March 10, 2006, (“Employment
Agreement”) by and between you and The Shaw Group Inc.





	 	1.	 	Paragraph 2 of the amendment of December 1, 2004, which amended Section 7(j) of
your Employment Agreement is hereby amended to delete the following language from that
provision:






“The Company will guarantee that the gain on any sale of such shares will not be less
than the Black-Scholes value calculated on the date of grant ($8 per share). The
effective date of this guarantee will be the expiration of the 90 day period for
exercising options pursuant to the Plan, or the one year period under 5(e) of your
Employment Agreement as the case may be, following termination of employment. However, at
any time during the term of the options, the Company may request in writing that you
exercise the options and sell the shares. In the event you choose to decline, the Company
shall receive a credit against the guaranteed accretion in an amount equal to the
difference between i) the closing share price on the third day after the date of such
written request and ii) the exercise price of the options.”




	 	2.	 	Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, all other provisions of the
Employment Agreement remain unchanged.




Effective this 31st day of December, 2006




	 	 	 
	 

	 	                        The Shaw Group Inc.
	 
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/ Robert L. Belk
	 	/s/ Gary P. Graphia
	 
	 	 
	Robert L. Belk
	 	By: Gary P. Graphia
Exhibit 23




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-160429, 333-127595, 333-103209,
and Form S-3 No. 333-164379) of AirTran Holdings, Inc., and in the related
Prospectuses, of our reports dated February 11, 2010, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of AirTran Holdings, Inc. and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of AirTran Holdings,
Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2009.




/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Orlando, Florida


February 11, 2010
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
  Residential
    Capital, LLC
  Exhibit 12.1 
    Computation of the Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    Three MonthsEnded March 31,2008


2007(Dollars in thousands)Net loss before adjustment for minority interest

$
(820,809
)

$
(891,387
)Income tax (benefit) expense


(28,182
)


70,641Equity-method investee distribution


25,070



27,272Equity-method investee earnings


(1,548
)


(17,226
)Interest expense


1,170,396



1,745,184Interest portion of rental expense


8,307



10,536Earnings available to cover fixed charges

$
353,234


$
945,020Fixed Charges:Interest expense

$
1,170,396


$
1,745,184Interest portion of rental expense


8,307



10,536Total fixed charges

$
1,178,703


$
1,755,720Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(a)


0.30



0.54     (a)
    
    The ratio calculation indicates a less than one-to-one coverage
    for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
    Earnings available for the three months ended March 31,
    2008 and 2007, are inadequate to cover total fixed charges. The
    deficit amounts for both periods for the ratios were
    $0.8 billion.
J ULIE O ETTINGER M ANAGING D IRECTOR –I NTERNATIONAL & R EGULATORY A FFAIRS (202) 296-2370 (202) 296-2869 F AX

JULIE

. OETTINGER @ UNITED

. COM

January 28, 2010

Ms. Renee V. Wright Program Manager, Dockets Operations U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Room W 12-140 Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Joint Application and Notice of United Air Lines, Inc. and Brussels Airlines N.V./S,A.

Dockets DOT-OST-2010-0024 and DOT-OST-2004-19148

Dear Ms. Wright:

Enclosed for submission in the above-refe renced dockets are redacted copies of agreements relating to the code-share arrangem ent between United and Brussels Airlines.

Respectfully submitted,

JULIE OETTINGER Managing Director – International & Regulatory Affairs UNITED AIR LINES, INC.

cc: Esta Rosenberg and George Wellington

Service List – Those interested in receiv ing copies of the agreements should contact Annalei Avanceña (Phone 312/997-8349)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all persons

named below by causing a copy to be sent via email.

byerlyjr@state.gov

carl.nelson@aa.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

hkamen@coair.com howard_kass@usairways.com jhill@dowlohnes.com jim.ballough@faa.gov john.allen@faa.gov

msinick@ssd.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

esahr@eckertseamans.com

Annalei Avanceña Advisor—Regulatory Affairs

DATED: January 28, 2010
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Vincent Verdiramo, President of Serino 5, Corp. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 22, 2006



/s/ Vincent L. Verdiramo

___________________________



President
# L_2006072EN.01001101.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 72/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 72/11

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 419/2006

of 10 March 2006

on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat (2),

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f).

| (2) | Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 at 11 500 t. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 at 11 500 t.

| (3) | It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 March 2006 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.

2.   Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of April 2006 for 8 574,695 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 March 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 March 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2186/2005 (OJ L 347, 30.12.2005, p. 74).

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of DynCorp International LLC
(DynCorp) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Thorne, the Chief Financial Officer of DynCorp, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DynCorp.

Date: February 23, 2006



/s/    MICHAEL J. THORNEMichael J. ThorneSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer)
# L_2006108EN.01001201.xml

| 21.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 108/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 108/12

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 618/2006

of 20 April 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 24th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 24th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 28,395 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 April 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 185, 16.7.2005, p. 3.

2

---
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

August 2, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00476-CV

IN RE A.C., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

246th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-05628

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 28, 2022, relator A.C. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this 

court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the 

petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Angela L. GravesHarrington, presiding judge of the 246th District Court of Harris County, to set aside 

her June 22, 2022 order denying relator’s emergency motion for extension of 

discovery period and for temporary support. 
2

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny 

relator’s amended emergency motion to stay. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Hassan.
0.000

0.050

0.100

0.150

0.200

0.250

0.300

0.350

0.400

2b-5 Class 6-7 Class 8

Brake Limit - Braking W

orki/ Tractive W

ork

Brake Limit Using GEM Results

Brake Limit using Method I Originally Proposed

Brake Limit using Method Cummins Proposed
y = 0.00042x + 0.22468

R2 = 0.90841

y = 0.00027x + 0.23940

R2 = 0.80818

y = 0.00041x + 0.19158

R2 = 0.82992

0.000

0.050

0.100

0.150

0.200

0.250

0.300

0.350

0.400

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Brake Limit - Braking Energy/ Traction Energy

System Rated Power (kW)

Brake Limit Using GEM Results

Brake Limit using Method I Originally Proposed

Brake Limit using Method Cummins Proposed

Linear (Brake Limit Using GEM Results)

Linear (Brake Limit using Method I Originally 

Proposed)

Linear (Brake Limit using Method Cummins 

Proposed)
Class

Rated 

Power 

(kW)

Cycle Miles W(-) W(+) W(-) / 

W(+)

"A" Veh (GEM) 

(g/ton-mile)

"B" Veh 

(g/ton-mile)

Tran 2.84 0.93 2.58 0.359 421.5 270.3

55 4.58 0 5.33 0 319.6 319.6

65 5.41 0 8.18 0 411.6 411.6

Tran 2.84 1.53 3.71 0.411 269.9 159.1

55 4.58 0 6.08 0 186.5 186.5

65 5.41 0 9.06 0 239.3 239.3

Tran 2.84 2.60 5.97 0.436 300.1 169.3

55 4.58 0 8.54 0 162.7 162.7

65 5.41 0 12.49 0 196.3 196.3

Class 8

149

201

339

2b-5

Class 6-7
Weighting 

Factors

"A" Veh 

weighted (GEM) 

(g/ton-mile)

"B" Veh 

weighted 

(g/ton-mile)

W(-) 

Weighted 

W(+) 

Weighted

Brake Limit 

Using GEM 

Results

Brake Limit 

using 

Method I 

Originally 

Proposed

0.75 316.1 202.7 0.245 0.682

0.09 28.8 28.8 0 0.105

0.16 65.8 65.8 0 0.242

0.75 202.5 119.3 0.403 0.981

0.09 16.8 16.8 0 0.119

0.16 38.3 38.3 0 0.268

0.75 225.1 127.0 0.687 1.576

0.09 14.6 14.6 0 0.168

0.16 31.4 31.4 0 0.369

0.362 0.327

0.276 0.269

0.323 0.308
Brake Limit 

using Method 

Cummins 

Proposed

0.325

0.238

0.294
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 28, 2014

s0224 

# Order

Clerk February 28, 2014

148241

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148241

COA: 311055

Oakland CC: 2011

- 236092

- FH

ARSENIO DEANDRE HENDRIX,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
ADVANCED BIOPHOTONICS INC.
                           125 Wilbur Place, Suite 120
                             Bohemia, New York 11716

                                                                December 8, 2006

The N.I.R. Group LLC
1044 Northern Boulevard
Roslyn, New York 11576

Gentlemen:

      Reference is made to certain Securities Purchase Agreements dated as of
November 14, 2005, September 12, 2006 and October 31, 2006, by and among
Advanced BioPhotonics Inc. (the "Company") and AJW Partners, LLC, AJW Offshore,
Ltd., AJW Qualified Partners, LLC and New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC
(collectively, the "Investors") pursuant to which the Investors purchased
secured convertible notes (the "Notes") and common stock purchase warrants (the
"Warrants") of the Company.

      Section 1.6(d) of the Notes and Section 4(a) and 4(b) of the Warrants
provide for an adjustment to the conversion price of the Notes and the exercise
price of the Warrants if the Company issues or sells any shares of Common Stock
or Convertible Securities for a consideration per share less than a price equal
to the conversion and exercise prices in effect immediately prior to such
issuance or sale.

      Accordingly, the Company hereby requests that the Investors execute and
return this letter in order to confirm that they individually waive any prior or
future adjustment to the conversion prices of the Notes and the exercise prices
to the Warrants, pursuant to Section 1.6(d) of the Notes and Section 4(a) and
4(b) of the Warrants, for any issuances of any securities by the Company to the
Investors prior to, or subsequent to the date hereof.

      Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter and for your continued
support of the Company.


                                  ADVANCED BIOPHOTONICS INC.


                                  By: /s/ Denis O'Connor
                                      ------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Denis O'Connor
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>

AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:

AJW PARTNERS, LLC
By:  SMS Group, LLC


/s/ Corey S. Ribotsky
----------------------------------------
Corey S. Ribotsky
Manager


AJW OFFSHORE, LTD.
By: First Street Manager II, LLC


/s/ Corey S. Ribotsky
----------------------------------------
Corey S. Ribotsky
Manager


AJW QUALIFIED PARTNERS, LLC
By:  AJW Manager, LLC


/s/ Corey S. Ribotsky
----------------------------------------
Corey S. Ribotsky
Manager


NEW MILLENNIUM CAPITAL PARTNERS II, LLC
By:  First Street Manager II, LLP

/s/ Corey S. Ribotsky
----------------------------------------
Corey S. Ribotsky
Manager
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5531]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9644-7]


Good Neighbor Environmental Board; Notification of Public 
Advisory Committee Teleconference

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notification of Public Advisory Committee Teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-
463, notice is hereby given that the Good Neighbor Environmental Board 
(GNEB) will hold a public teleconference on March 22, 2012 from 12 p.m. 
to 5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. The meeting is open to the public. For 
further information regarding the teleconference and background 
materials, please contact Mark Joyce at the number listed below.
    Background: GNEB is a federal advisory committee chartered under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92463. GNEB provides 
advice and recommendations to the President and Congress on 
environmental and infrastructure issues along the U.S. border with 
Mexico.
    Purpose of Meeting: The purpose of this teleconference is to 
discuss the Good Neighbor Environmental Board's Fifteenth Report. The 
report will focus on water infrastructure issues in the U.S.-Mexico 
border region.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you wish to make oral comments or submit 
written comments to the Board, please contact Mark Joyce at least five 
days prior to the meeting.
    General Information: Additional information concerning the GNEB can 
be found on its Web site at www.epa.gov/ofacmo/gneb.
    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities, please contact Mark Joyce at (202) 564-
2130 or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0babfa9b3b5febdb1a2bb90b5a0b1feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f2520362c2a61222e3d240f2a3f2e61282039">[email protected]</span></a>. To request accommodation of a 
disability, please contact Mark Joyce at least 10 days prior to the 
meeting to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: February 29, 2012.
Mark Joyce,
Acting Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-5531 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>