alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A0 74 0 . MONTE GALE SALYER v . THE STATE.

A ju ry fo u n d M on t e Gal e Sal y er g u i l t y o f m u l ti p l e o f f e n s es , i n cl ud i n g ch i ld

m o les t a t i o n

. T h e tri al co u rt d en i ed Sal y er’ s m o t i on fo r n ew t ri al o n Sep t em b er 1 8,

2 0 1 5

, an d Sal y er fi l ed a n o t ice o f ap p eal o n No v em b er 4

, 2 01 5

. W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n. T o b e t i m el y , a n ot i ce o f ap p eal m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry o f t h e

o rd er o n a p p e a l

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e pro p er an d t i m el y fi l i ng o f a n o t i ce

o f ap p eal i s an ab so l u t e req u i rem en t t o co n fer ju ri s d i ct i o n o n th i s Co urt

. See Co u ch

v. Un i t ed Pa

p er wo r ker s In t l

. Un i o n , 2 2 4 Ga. A p p

. 7 2 1 (4 8 2 SE2 d 7 0 4 ) (1 9 9 7 ).

Becau s e Sal y er fi l ed h i s n o ti ce o f ap p eal 4 7 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e o rd er h e s eek s to

ap p eal

, i t i s u n t i m el y

. A cco r d i n g l y, t h is ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

. W e n o t e, h o wev er, Sal y er’ s co n t en t io n t h at t h e t r i al co u rt ’ s o rd er was n ot

m ai l ed to h i m u nt i l Oct o b er 1 3

, 2 0 1 5

, an d t h at h e recei v ed t h e o rd er on Oct o b er 1 9,

2 0 1 5

. To t h e ex t en t t hat Sal y er w as n o t g iv en t i m el y n o t ice of t he t ri al co u rt ’ s ru l i n g, h i s rem ed y i s t o p et i t io n t h e t ri al co u rt to v acat e an d re-en t er t he ord er as a m ean s o f

co rrect in g t h e p ro b l e m

. S e e C a mb r o n v. Ca n a l In s

. Co

. , 24 6 Ga. 14 7

, 1 4 8 -1 4 9 (1 ) (2 6 9 SE2 d 4 2 6 ) (1 9 8 0 ). Th e re-en t ry o f t he o rd er b eg i n s an ew t h e t i m e fo r fi l i n g a

n o t i ce o f ap p eal

. See i d

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/08/2016 January 08, 2016
<PAGE>

                           CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT

     First Keystone Federal Savings Bank (the "Company") has engaged Marshall
Soss and KarMar Realty Group, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (together
hereinafter referred to as "Broker"), as an independent contractor to determine
the availability of the sites identified in the Master Branching Analysis,
Chester and Delaware Counties, dated December 30, 1996 (the "Master Branching
Analysis"), prepared for the Company by The Lancaster Group.

     In consideration of the engagement, the payment of Ten ($10.00), receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, and other good and valuable consideration, Broker
agrees as follows:

     1. The relationship between the Company and the Broker pursuant to the
above-referenced engagement may be terminated at any time for any reason or for
no reason, by written notice from either party provided that written notice
shall be given at least one (1) week prior to the effective date of termination.

     2. The Broker hereby covenants and agrees that, both during the engagement
and following the termination of the engagement with the Company for any reason,
the Broker will not disclose to any person, firm or entity, any of the findings
and conclusions, summary or recommendations set forth in the Master Branching
Analysis or any other confidential or proprietary information obtained by Broker
while engaged by Company, nor will Broker use any such information for Broker's
own purposes. Nothing in this agreement shall restrict Broker's ability to
disclose information obtained pursuant to the engagement where such disclosures
is necessary for the effective discharge of Broker's duties.

     3. Broker recognizes that the restrictive covenants contained in this
document are essential to protect the business interests and goals of the
Company and that violation of the restrictions will cause irreparable harm to
the Company. Broker thus agrees that, should Broker violate any of the
restrictive covenants, Company shall be entitled to seek special, preliminary
and permanent inductive relief, as well as any other rights or remedies to which
Company shall be entitled.

                                        KARMAR REALTY GROUP, INC.


Date: January 30, 1997                  BY: /s/ Marshall J. Soss
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                                           Pres.


                                        BY: /s/ Marshall J. Soss          (SEAL)
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            MARSHALL J. SOSS
**Exhibit 10.17****ALLONGE****to Amended and Restated Revolving Note dated November 1, 2006**     THIS ALLONGE is made and entered into as of the 1st day of November 2007, by andbetween US BIO WOODBURY, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company, fka, SUPERIOR CORN PRODUCTS,LLC, a Michigan limited liability company (the “Borrower”) and AGSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, PCA, (the“Lender”).**RECITALS**     A. The Borrower previously executed and delivered to the Lender an Amended and RestatedRevolving Note in the original principal amount of $3,500,000.00, dated November 1, 2006 (the“Note”) to which this Allonge is attached.     B. The Borrower has requested that Lender extend the maturity date of the Note.     C. The Lender is willing to make such modifications to the terms of the Note, all inaccordance with the terms and conditions of this Allonge.**AGREEMENT**     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants containedin this Allonge and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of whichare hereby acknowledged by the Borrower and the Lender, the parties agree as follows:     **1. ****Modification of Note****.**Notwithstanding any of the provisions of that certain SecondAmended and Restated Construction and Revolving Loan Agreement dated September 27, 2006 (the “LoanAgreement”), the Note is amended as follows: a. Paragraph #6 of the Note is hereby amended to read as follows:    “The outstanding principal balance hereof, together with all accrued interest, ifnot paid sooner, shall be due and payable in full on October 29, 2008 (the “MaturityDate”).     **2. ****Remaining Terms****.**It is further understood and agreed by and between the Borrowerand the Lender that all other terms and provisions of the Note shall remain in full force andeffect, enforceable by the Lender against the Borrower as fully as though no amendments had beenmade hereby, and this Allonge shall not be deemed to hinder, compromise or lessen theenforceability of the Note, or any mortgage, security interest, or guaranty securing repayment ofthe Note, in any way.
 

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Allonge to be duly executed anddelivered as of the date and year first above written.**BORROWER:****US BIO WOODBURY, LLC**, a
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Washington Nelson, Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 15, 1990, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, *inter alia,*that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reopened its prior decision in claimant’s case only for the purpose of determining whether there was compliance with the consent judgment in *Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin*(79 Civ 5899). Upon reconsideration the Board found no substantial procedural violations warranting a change in its decision denying claimant unemployment insurance benefits. Since claimant does not allege any procedural errors, the Board’s decision should be affirmed. In any event, there was substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause *(see, Matter of Fontana [Levine],*53 AD2d 742). The Board was presented with conflicting evidence as to the reasons for claimant’s separation from employment, the resolution of which was for it to determine *(see, Matter of Jensen [Levine],*49 AD2d 794). The evidence supports the finding that claimant asked for his *996vacation pay, advised his employer that he was leaving and failed to return at the end of his vacation. The facts also support the further conclusion that claimant made willful false statements in order to obtain benefits *(see, Matter of Petty [Roberts],*90 AD2d 604).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr. and Crew III, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1893 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1893

       To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzenamine, 4 Dodecyl.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzenamine, 4 Dodecyl.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENZENAMINE, 4 DODECYL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Benzenamine, 4      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        Dodecyl (CAS No.                                                   31/2011.......
                        104-42-7)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2904.10.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Red Rock Pictures Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April 19, 2011/s/ Reno RolléReno Rollé,President, Chief Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer and Director
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         Each director and/or officer of CheckFree Corporation (the
"Corporation") whose signature appears below hereby appoints Peter J. Kight,
David E. Mangum, and Curtis A. Loveland as the undersigned's attorneys or any of
them individually as the undersigned's attorney, to sign, in the undersigned's
name and behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2003, and likewise to sign and file with the Commission any and
all amendments to the Form 10-K, and the Corporation hereby also appoints such
persons as its attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its attorney-in-fact with
like authority to sign and file the Form 10-K and any amendments thereto
granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and
revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such attorney-in-fact or the
undersigned's substitute may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 4th day of
September, 2003.

Signature                           Title


   /s/ Peter J. Kight               Chairman of the Board and
-----------------------------       Chief Executive Officer
  Peter J. Kight                    (Principal Executive Officer)

   /s/ David E. Mangum              Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
-----------------------------       Officer
  David E. Mangum                   (Principal Financial Officer)

   /s/ John J. Browne, Jr.          Vice President, Controller, and
-----------------------------       Chief Accounting Officer
  John J. Browne, Jr.               (Principal Accounting Officer)

   /s/ William P. Boardman          Director
-----------------------------
  William P. Boardman

   /s/ James D. Dixon               Director
-----------------------------
  James D. Dixon

   /s/ Henry C. Duques              Director
-----------------------------
  Henry C. Duques

   /s/ Mark A. Johnson              Director
-----------------------------
  Mark A. Johnson

   /s/ Lewis C. Levin               Director
-----------------------------
  Lewis C. Levin

   /s/ Eugene F. Quinn              Director
-----------------------------
  Eugene F. Quinn

   /s/ Jeffrey M. Wilkins           Director
-----------------------------
  Jeffrey M. Wilkins
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1953 

To suspend temporarily the duty on p-toluidine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on p-toluidine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. P-TOLUIDINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 p-Toluidine (CAS No. 106– 

49–0) (provided for in subheading 2921.43.40) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1953 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NOS. 02-15-00316-CR

 02-15-00317-CR

ANTHONY LEWIS HERNANDEZ APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1345037W, 1343502D

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Withdraw Appeal.” The 

motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: February 4, 2016
---

Exhibit: 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Riverbank Resources Inc.,
  (the "Company") on 10QSB for the period ending January 31, 2006, as filed with
  the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
  Earl Hope, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                  
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.

Date: March 6, 2006.

/s/ Earl HopeEarl Hope

Chief Executive Officer

  (Title)

---
EX-4.4



 




Exhibit 4.4




AMENDED AND RESTATED

CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

OF

PNC CAPITAL TRUST F,

A DELAWARE STATUTORY TRUST




     This Amended and Restated Certificate of Trust of PNC Capital Trust F (the “Trust”) is being
duly executed and filed pursuant to the Delaware Statutory Trust Act,
12 Del. Code §3801 et seq. (the “Act”). The Trust was formed by the filing of its original Certificate
of Trust effective on April 16, 1998.



     The
Certificate of Trust is hereby amended and restated in its entirety
pursuant to Section 3810(c)(1) of the Act to read as follows:


     1.   NAME. The name of the statutory trust is PNC Capital Trust F.





     2.   DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust having its
principal place of business in the State of Delaware are:


The Bank of New York (Delaware)

White Clay Center

Route 273

Newark, DE 19711



     3.   EFFECTIVE DATE. This Amended and Restated Certificate of Trust shall be effective
immediately upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trustee named below does hereby execute this Amended and Restated
Certificate of Trust as of the 9 day of January, 2007.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE),

not in its individual capacity but solely as Delaware

Trustee

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
Kristine K. Gullo 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Title 	Vice
President
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 92-8111 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELENA HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - - (October 22, 1992) Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Elena Hernandez was charged with conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute after marijuana was found in her car during a search at a permanent border patrol checkpoint. Her motion to suppress was denied, and she entered a conditional guilty plea to count two of the indictment, reserving her right to appeal the denial of the motion to suppress. She was sentenced to 33 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. Hernandez argues that her initial detention at secondary and the exterior canine search of her car were unconstitutional. The determination that a search or seizure did not violate the fourthNo. 92-8111 -2- amendment is a question of law reviewed de novo . U.S. v. Martinez-Perez , 941 F.2d 295, 297 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied , 112 S.Ct. 1295 (1992). "[S]tops for brief questioning routinely conducted at permanent checkpoints are consistent with the Fourth Amendment and need not be authorized by warrant." U.S. v. Martinez-Fuerte , 428 U.S. 543, 566, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1976). Border patrol agents may stop motorists, question them about their citizenship, and selectively refer them to secondary without individualized suspicion. Id . at 562-63. Agents may also make referrals to conduct inquiries about controlled substances. See U.S. v. Dovali-Avila , 895 F.2d 206, 207 (5th Cir. 1990). Border patrol agents, however, may not conduct a warrantless search of the referred vehicle without consent or probable cause. Dovali-Avila , 895 F.2d at 207. A canine "sniff" of the exterior of a car does not constitute a search within the fourth amendment. Dovali-Avila , 895 F.2d at 207-80; U.S. v. GonzalezBasulto , 898 F.2d 1011, 1013 (5th cir. 1990). Border Patrol Agent Arzate properly referred Hernandez's car to secondary and conducted a canine "sniff." Once the dog alerted Arzate had probable cause to search the car and legally discovered the marijuana. Gonzalez-Basulto , 898 F.2d at 1013. The district court properly denied the motion to suppress. AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,568
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 474,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        448,754
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   474,289
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,674
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   748
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,483
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,022
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,461
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,461
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>