# NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report

Prepared for:


# Industrial Insulation Group, LLC

Phenix City Plant 908 John Bussey Drive Phenix City, Alabama 36869

Project No. 10-3990.14 January 28, 2011

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street Ferndale, Michigan 48220

(248) 548-8070

### Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 i 

## Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulat ion Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) and its members to a voluntary collection of residu al risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 1 

## as well as for the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 2 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retain ed by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the Cupola located at the Industrial Insulation Group LLC Plant in Phenix Cit y, Alabama:

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 

## )

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, co balt, lead, manganese, nickel, and

selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

In addition, NAIMA retained BTEC to evaluate emissi ons rates for the compounds listed below from the exhaust stack associated with the Curing O ven at the Phenix City complex:

• Formaldehyde, Phenol and Methanol

• Carbon Monoxide and Carbonyl Sulfide

Testing was performed by METCO Environmental (METCO ) of Carrollton, Texas on behalf of BTEC. Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and NAIMA prior to initiating test program fiel dwork. Tables I and II on the following pages summarize the overall results of the emission s test program.

1 

### Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD )

2 

### Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

### Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 ii 

## Table I Cupola Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate (lbs/hour) Emission

Rate (lbs/ton) Emission

Rate (mg/dscm)

Filterable PM 2.5 

## 5.7E+00 1.6E+01

Organic

Condensible PM 2.5 

## 1.9E-01 5.6E-01

Inorganic

Condensible PM 2.5 

## 7.8E+00 2.3E+01 Cupola -

Stack 101 October 26

& 27, 2010

Total PM 2.5 

## 1.4E+01 4.0E+01

Filterable

Particulate 3.4E+00 1.0E+01

Antimony < 7.3E-05 2.2E-04

Arsenic < 7.3E-05 2.2E-04
Beryllium < 1.8E-05 5.4E-05

Cadmium 2.4E-04 7.0E-04

Chromium 3.0E-04 8.8E-04

Cobalt 2.2E-04 6.5E-04

Lead 8.7E-04 2.6E-03
Manganese < 3.1E-04 9.0E-04

Nickel 5.5E-04 1.6E-03 Cupola -

Stack 101 October 26

& 27, 2010

Selenium 1.6E-03 4.7E-03

Cupola -

Stack 101 October 28,

2010 Mercury 3.8E-06 1.1E-05

Cupola -

Stack 101 October 27

& 28, 2010 Hexavalent

Chromium < 7.0E-05 2.1E-04

Hydrogen

Chloride < 5.9E-02 1.7E-01 Cupola -

Stack 101 October 26

& 27, 2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 7.3E-02 2.2E-01

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ). (2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the sample fractions.

### Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 iii 

## Table II Curing Oven Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate (lbs/hour) Emission

Rate (lbs/ton) Emission

Rate (mg/dscm)

Formaldehyde 2.9E-01 1.5E+01

Methanol 6.7E-04 3.5E-02 Curing

Oven October 26,

2010 Phenol 2.5E-03 1.3E-01

Carbonyl Sulfide 1.9E+00 2.1E-04 Curing

Oven October 26,

2010 Carbon Monoxide 2.2E-03 2.8E+01

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ). (2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the sample fractions.

### Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 i 

## TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................

................................................... ..................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ................................

................................................... ............ 2

2.1 P ROCESS 

## M ONITORING



## ................................................... ................................................... . 2

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............. ................................ 3

3.1 E XHAUST 

## G AS 

## V ELOCITY



## , M OLECULAR 

## W EIGHT



## , AND 

## M OISTURE 

## C ONTENT 

## .................... 3

3.2 PM AND 

## PM 2.5 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES



## ................................................... 4

3.3 T OTAL 

## S ELECTED 

## M ETALS 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................ 4

3.4 H G 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES



## ................................................... .................. 4

3.5 H EXAVALENT 

## C HROMIUM 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................. 5

3.6 HF AND 

## HC L 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES



## ................................................... .. 5 3.7 HCOH, M E 

## OH AND 

## P HENOL 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ............................ 5

3.8 CO AND 

## COS C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES



## ................................................... . 5

4.0 TEST RESULTS .......................................

................................................... ....................... 7

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel Table 2 – Cupola Emissions Test Program Summary Table 3 – Curing Oven Emissions Test Program Summar y

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Cupola Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diag ram Figure 2 – Curing Oven Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram Figure 3 – Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawi ng Figure 4 – OTM 27/OTM 28 Sampling Train Schematic D rawing Figure 5 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawi ng Figure 6 – Method 30B Sampling Train Schematic Draw ing Figure 7 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Dra wing Figure 8 – Method 26A Sampling Train Schematic Draw ing Figure 9 – Method 316 Sampling Train Schematic Diag ram Figure 10 – Method 318 Sampling Train Schematic Dia gram

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results Appendix B – Process Data Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Shee ts and Notes Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports Appendix F – Method 318 Analytical Report

### Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 1 

## 1.0 Introduction

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulat ion Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) and its members to a voluntary collection of residu al risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 3 

## as well as for the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 4 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retain ed by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the Cupola located at the Industrial Insulation Group LLC (IIG) Plant in Phen ix City, Alabama:

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 

## )

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, co balt, lead, manganese, nickel, and

selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

In addition, NAIMA retained BTEC to evaluate emissi ons rates for the compounds listed below from the exhaust stack associated with the Curing O ven at the Phenix City complex:

• Formaldehyde, Phenol and Methanol

• Carbon Monoxide and Carbonyl Sulfide

Testing was performed by METCO Environmental (METCO ) of Carrollton, Texas on behalf of BTEC. Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and NAIMA prior to initiating test program fiel dwork. The emissions test program was conducted on October 26, 27, and 28, 2010.

The test program consisted of triplicate emission t ests at each location for each parameter. The field sampling portion of the emissions test progra m included the personnel summarized by Table

1.

Table 1 Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation

Shane Lee METCO Ryan Jones METCO Will Starkey METCO

Jeremiah Johnson METCO

Mike Luckett METCO

Rick Dolin IIG

3 

### Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD )

4 

### Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

### Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 2 

## 2.0 Process Description

Basalt, dolomite, and limestone are fed to a coke-f ired cupola furnace and melted to be formed into mineral wool. Emissions from this cupola are exhausted through a baghouse, a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a single exhaust stack (Stack 101). The stack is 8.5 feet in diameter and is equipped with four test ports, each six inches in d iameter.

After being formed into mineral wool, the mat is fe d through curing ovens where the mineral

wool resin reaction is cured. Emissions from the c uring ovens are exhausted through a filterhouse, an afterburner, and a single exhaust s tack (Stack 102). This stack is 26 inches in

diameter.

2.1 Process Monitoring

During the emissions test program, the Cupola and C uring Oven were operated under normal conditions. In addition to production rate during each test run, process operating data recorded during the emissions test program included raw mate rial feed rates, baghouse pressure drop, and regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) operating tempe rature. Process production data is available in Appendix B. Other process and control equipment data will be available to U.S. EPA on

request.

### Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 3 

## 3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emiss ions test program can be separated into eight categories as follows:

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weig ht, and moisture content; (2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM and PM 2.5 

## concentrations and emission rates; (3) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals co ncentrations and emission rates; (4) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and em ission rates; (5) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chromium conc entrations and emission rates; (6) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentration s and emission rates; and, (7) Measurement of exhaust gas formaldehyde, methanol, and phenol concentrations and

emission rates. (8) Measurement of exhaust gas CO and COS concentration s and emission rates.

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologi es by category are summarized by Sections 3.1 through 3.8, respectively.

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moistur e Content

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weig ht, and moisture content was conducted using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A):

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points”

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate”

• Method 3A - “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concent rations in

Emissions from Stationary Sources”(Instrumental Ana lyzer Procedure)

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust ga s flowrates in conjunction with the isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate pollutant emission rates.

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in acco rdance with the procedures outlined in Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figures 1 and 2 for trav erse location drawings). An S-type pitot tube with a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in ac cordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (usi ng a manometer) and temperatures at each location during testing. The S-type pitot tube dim ensions was within specified limits, therefore, a baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensio nless) was assigned.

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A. The O 2 

## content of the exhaust gas was measured using a M&C Products PMA 1 00-L O 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent)

and the CO 2 

## content of the exhaust gas was measured using a Ca lifornia Analytical Instruments (CAI0 600 Series CO 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent). An integrated sampl e of the gas stream was drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe wi th an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizing an evacuated sample lung. At the completion of

### Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 4 

## each test the gas sample was introduced to the anal yzers. Data was recorded at 4-second intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition so ftware. A schematic drawing of the emission monitoring system is provided as Figure 3.

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Me thod 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was determined volumetrically (liquid impingers) and gr avimetrically (silica gel impinger).

3.2 PM and PM 2.5 

## Concentrations and Emission Rates

PM/PM 2.5 

## concentrations and emission rates were measured us ing U.S. EPA Other Test Methods (OTM) 27 and OTM 28. PM, PM 2.5 

## , and CPM concentrations and emission rates were

measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling syste m. This system consisted of (1) a tapered nozzle, (2) a PM 10 

## particle sizer cyclone followed by a PM 2.5 

## particle sizer cyclone, (3) a glass or quartz fiber filter assembly and heated probe, (4) a glass recirculating ice water condenser system, (5) a set of four GS impingers, (6) a length of sample

line, and (7) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the second and third impingers were filled with 100 ml of HPLC water, the first and fourth impingers were empty, a nd the fifth impinger contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A sch ematic drawing of the PM 2.5 

## /CPM sample train is provided as Figure 4. The total filterabl e PM fraction was collected on the front half of the M29 Metals sampling train as per the QAPP.

3.3 

## Total Selected Metals Concentrations and Emission R ates

Total selected metals concentrations and emission r ates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission rates were

measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling syste m. This system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or qua rtz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of s ix GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line,

and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first two impingers were fi lled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid (HNO 3 

## )/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinge r was empty, and the fourth contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desicca nt. A schematic drawing of the metals sampling train is provided as Figure 5.

3.4 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60,

Appendix A, Method 30B and using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a so rbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon

tubing, (4) three GS impingers, (5) a length of sam ple line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The first impinger was left empty as a water knockout, and the remaining two impinger s contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampl ing train is provided as Figure 6.

### Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 5 

## 3.5 Hexavalent Chromium Concentrations and Emission Rat es

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rat es were measured using the procedures of Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. He xavalent chromium concentrations and

emission rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a gl ass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a glass probe liner, (3) a Teflon tee with a recircul ating pump, (4) five GS impingers, (5) a length

of sample line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the f ourth was empty, and the last impinger contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desicca nt. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061 sampling train is provided as Figure 7.

3.6 HF and HCl Concentrations and Emission Rates

Measurement of hydrogen halide concentrations and e mission rates were conducted using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 26A. T he Method 26A sampling train consisted of: (1) a heated borosilicate or quartz probe liner ; (2) a heated borosilicate or quartz glass filter holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter was hed quartz filter with Teflon filter support; (3) a set of three Greensburg-Smith (GS) i mpingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1 Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H 2 

## SO 4 

## ), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known we ight of silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Figur e 8 provides an illustration of the Method 26A sample train.

3.7 HCOH, MeOH and Phenol Concentrations and Emission R ates

Measurement of HCOH, phenol, and MeOH concentration s and emission rates were conducted using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Meth od 316 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM98.01. HCOH, phenol, and MeOH concentrations and e mission rates were be measured using

Metco’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling syste m. This system consisted of (1) a steel nozzle, (2) a heated probe with a gl ass probe liner, (3) four GS impingers, (4) a

length of sample line, and (5) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first three impingers were filled with high purity water, and the last impinger contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 316 sampling train is provide d as Figure 9.

3.8 

## CO and COS Concentrations and Emission Rates

Measurement of CO and COS concentrations and emissi on rates were conducted using the procedures of 40 CFR 63, Appendix A, Method 318. S tack exhaust gas was continually purging through the sampling system and the Fourier Transfo rm Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer. The sample gas was extracted from the stack using a hea ted, stainless steel probe, maintained at

191 ° C. A heated filter box (191 ° C) connects from the probe to the filter assembly t o a heated

### Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 6 

## transfer line. A 0.1 μ glass filter was used for particulate matter remov al. A heated, diaphragm pump was used to pull the sample from the stack.

The heated transfer line, held at 191 ° C, connected the probe/filter assembly to the FTIR. The FTIR was equipped with a temperature-controlled, 5. 11 meter multipass gas cell maintained at

191 ° C. Gas flows and sampling system pressures were mo nitored using a rotometer and pressure transducer.

FTIR data was collected using an MKS MultiGas 2030 FTIR spectrometer. All data was

collected at 0.5cm -1 

## resolution. Each sample spectrum was derived from the co-addition of 60 scans, with a new data point generated every one mi nute. Figure 10 provides an illustration of the Method 318 sample train.

### Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 7 

## 4.0 Test Results

The overall results of the emissions test program a re summarized by Tables 2 and 3 below.

Table 2 Cupola Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate (lbs/hour) Emission

Rate (lbs/ton) Emission

Rate (mg/dscm)

Filterable PM 2.5 

## 5.7E+00 1.6E+01

Organic

Condensible PM 2.5 

## 1.9E-01 5.6E-01

Inorganic

Condensible PM 2.5 

## 7.8E+00 2.3E+01 Cupola -

Stack 101 October 26

& 27, 2010

Total PM 2.5 

## 1.4E+01 4.0E+01

Filterable

Particulate 3.4E+00 1.0E+01

Antimony < 7.3E-05 2.2E-04

Arsenic < 7.3E-05 2.2E-04
Beryllium < 1.8E-05 5.4E-05

Cadmium 2.4E-04 7.0E-04

Chromium 3.0E-04 8.8E-04

Cobalt 2.2E-04 6.5E-04

Lead 8.7E-04 2.6E-03
Manganese < 3.1E-04 9.0E-04

Nickel 5.5E-04 1.6E-03 Cupola -

Stack 101 October 26

& 27, 2010

Selenium 1.6E-03 4.7E-03

Cupola -

Stack 101 October 28,

2010 Mercury 3.8E-06 1.1E-05

Cupola -

Stack 101 October 27

& 28, 2010 Hexavalent

Chromium < 7.0E-05 2.1E-04

Hydrogen

Chloride < 5.9E-02 1.7E-01 Cupola -

Stack 101 October 26

& 27, 2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 7.3E-02 2.2E-01

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ). (2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the sample fractions.

### Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 8 

## Table II Curing Oven Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate (lbs/hour) Emission

Rate (lbs/ton) Emission

Rate (mg/dscm)

Formaldehyde 2.9E-01 1.5E+01

Methanol 6.7E-04 3.5E-02 Curing

Oven October 26,

2010 Phenol 2.5E-03 1.3E-01

Carbonyl Sulfide 1.9E+00 2.1E-04 Curing

Oven October 26,

2010 Carbon Monoxide 2.2E-03 2.8E+01

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ). (2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the sample fractions.



## Detailed results for individual emission test runs are summarized in Appendix A. Process data associated with the emissions test program is provi ded in Appendix B. Field and computergenerated data sheets are included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents and Appendix E includes laboratory analytical repor ts. Appendix F includes the Method 318 analytical report.

### Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 9 

## Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this repor t are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or Thermafiber, Inc. BTEC will not distribute or publ ish this report without NAIMA’s consent except as required by law or court order. BTEC acc epts responsibility for the competent performance of its duties in executing the assignme nt and preparing reports in accordance with the normal standards of the profession, but disclai ms any responsibility for consequential damages.

This report was prepared by:

David Center Staff Environmental Engineer

This report was reviewed by: Randal J. Tysar Senior Environmental Engineer

# FIGURES

### Diameter:

102.00 in

Points Distance "

12 2.1

11 6.8

10 12.0

9 18.1

8 25.5

7 36.3

6 65.7

5 76.5

4 83.9

3 90.0

2 95.2

1 99.9

Site: Industrial Insulation Group Phenix City, Alabama Site Cupola Stack (101) 

## Figure 1

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street
Ferndale, Michigan Not to Scale <0.5 diameters

<2 diameters

### Diameter:

26.00 in

Points Distance "

12 0.5

11 1.7

10 3.1

9 4.6

8 6.5

7 9.3

6 16.7

5 19.5

4 21.4

3 22.9

2 24.3

1 25.5

Site: Industrial Insulation Group Phenix City, Alabama Site Curing Oven Stack (102) 

## Figure 2

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street
Ferndale, Michigan Not to Scale <0.5 diameters

<2 diameters

### Bags Samples

to analyzers



## Figure 3

Site:

USEPA Method 3A Industrial Insulation Group Phenix City, Alabama BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street
Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System



### Calibration Gases (Fed to Probe Tip) Environics Gas Dilution System M&C Model 100-L

O 2 

### Analyzer CAI Series 600

CO 2 

### Analyzer pump tedlar bagFigure 4Site:USEPA OTM27/28Industrial Insulation GroupPhenix City, AlabamaBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan**Pump Silica gel** **Heated Filter Box S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple** **Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle Meter Rig** **Temp. Probe** **Filter On** **Off -** **+ 00:00** **1 2 3 4 5 45mm Filter Housing** **Filter Holder W/ Teflon Filter Verticle Condenser** **Pot Belly Impinger 100 mL DI H** **2 O** Figure 5Site:USEPA Method 29Industrial Insulation GroupPhenix City, AlabamaBT Environmental Consulting Inc.2615 Wolcott StreetFerndale, Michigan 48220PumpSilica gel100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solutionHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Figure 6Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainIndustrial Insulation GroupPhenix City, AlabamaBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 Wolcott StreetFerndale, Michigan 48220Knock outPumpTemperature sensorMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Sample LineDessicantMercuryTrapProbeFigure 7Site:USEPA Method 0061Industrial Insulation GroupPhenix City, AlabamaBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganPumpMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5150 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptySilica GelPerastaltic pumpTeflon tee75 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptyFigure 8Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainIndustrial Insulation GroupPhenix City, AlabamaBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 Wolcott StreetFerndale, Michigan 48220PumpHeated Filter BoxS-type pitot w/ thermocoupleHeated probe with glass linerMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Empty100 mL 0.1NSilica GelFigure 9Site:USEPA Method 316Industrial Insulation GroupPhenix City, AlabamaBT Environmental Consulting Inc.2615 Wolcott StreetFerndale, Michigan 48220PumpSilica gel100 ml Ultrafiltered H2OHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5

### heated sample line



## Figure 10

Site:

USEPA Method 318 Industrial Insulation Group Phenix City, Alabama BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street
Ferndale, Michigan 48220

Data Acquisition System



### Calibration and Tracer Gases (Fed to Probe Tip) MKS MultiGas 2030 FTIR spectrometer

# APPENDIX A

DETAILED TEST RUN

RESULTS

## Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing - 26A

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/26/2010 10/27/2010 10/27/2010

Start Run Start Time 18:01:00 12:30:00 14:45:00

Run Finish Time 19:08:00 14:40:00 15:48:00
Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 60



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280



### C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.805 0.805 0.805 0.81



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.46 29.73 29.66 29.62



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.23 1.36 1.36 1.32



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 43.761 44.959 44.356 44.359



### t
m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 91.46 87.42 92.08 90.32



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 41.920 43.796 42.743 42.820



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 42.9 52.5 48.5 48.0



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.02 2.47 2.28 2.26



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.6 5.3 5.1 5.0



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.954 0.947 0.949 0.950



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.90 1.01 1.01 0.97



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 19.80 19.84 19.84 19.83



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.3 79.15 79.15 79.2



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.94 28.96 28.96 28.95



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.43 28.37 28.40 28.40



### P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.23



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.48 29.74 29.67 29.63



### t
s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 177 205 206 196



### ∆ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.316 0.327 0.327 0.323



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 33.6 34.9 34.9 34.5



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 57.6 57.6 57.6 57.6



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 90,528 90,087

89,939

90,185



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 116,224 120,510

120,538

119,090



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 104.3 109.0 106.5 106.6



### W p Production, tons rock charged to the cupola per hour



### W HCl Catch Weight, μg 230 200 200 210



### C mg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E-01 1.6E-01 1.7E-01 1.7E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.6E-02 5.4E-02 5.6E-02 5.9E-02



### E lb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W HF Catch Weight, μg 380 200 200 260



### C mg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 3.2E-01 1.6E-01 1.7E-01 2.2E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-01 5.4E-02 5.6E-02 7.3E-02



### E lb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.14

Intl. Insulation Group
Phenix City, AL Cupola (stack 101) Source

Luckett PersonnelPlant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/26/2010 10/26/2010 10/27/2010

Start Run Start Time 10:10:00 14:15:00 8:37:00

Run Finish Time 13:27:00 17:36:00 11:56:00
Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192

D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280

C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.805 0.805 0.805 0.81

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013

P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.60 29.44 29.78 29.61

∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.21 1.24 1.24 1.23

V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 134.164 136.270 137.525 135.986

t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 91.38 94.84 88.31 91.51

V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 129.140 129.656 133.934 130.910

V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 138.3 125.4 149.9 137.9

V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 6.51 5.90 7.06 6.49

% H 2 O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.8 4.4 5.0 4.7

M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.952 0.956 0.950 0.953

%CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.96 0.87 1.01 0.95

%O 2 Oxygen, % 19.78 19.73 19.62 19.71

% CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.26 79.4 79.37 79.3

M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.94 28.93 28.95 28.94

M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.42 28.45 28.40 28.42

P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30

P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.62 29.46 29.80 29.63

t
s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 189 179 202 190

∆ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.312 0.319 0.324 0.319

v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 33.7 33.8 34.5 34.0

A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 57.6 57.6 57.6 57.6

Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 89,174 91,003

90,010

90,062

Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 116,323 116,911

119,355

117,529

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.7 99.9 104.4 102.0

W p Production, tons rock charged to the cupola per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 39.1 22.7 49.7 37.2

C mg/dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 10.7 6.2 13.1 10.0

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.57 2.11 4.42 3.37

E lb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

C mg/dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 2.2E-04 2.2E-04 2.1E-04 2.2E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.3E-05 7.4E-05 7.1E-05 7.3E-05

E lb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

C mg/dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 2.2E-04 2.2E-04 2.1E-04 2.2E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.3E-05 7.4E-05 7.1E-05 7.3E-05

E lb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

C mg/dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.5E-05 5.4E-05 5.3E-05 5.4E-05

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-05 1.9E-05 1.8E-05 1.8E-05

E lb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 1.39 6.01 0.26 2.55

C mg/dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 3.8E-04 1.6E-03 6.9E-05 7.0E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.3E-04 5.6E-04 2.3E-05 2.4E-04

E lb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 4.5 3.5 1.7 3.2

C mg/dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.2E-03 9.5E-04 4.5E-04 8.8E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.1E-04 3.2E-04 1.5E-04 3.0E-04

E lb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 2.76 3.61 0.76 2.38

C mg/dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 7.5E-04 9.8E-04 2.0E-04 6.5E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.5E-04 3.4E-04 6.8E-05 2.2E-04

E lb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 6.5 20.4 1.5 9.5

C mg/dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 1.8E-03 5.6E-03 4.0E-04 2.6E-03

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.9E-04 1.9E-03 1.3E-04 8.7E-04

E lb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 3.6 4.9 1.5 3.3

C mg/dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 9.8E-04 1.3E-03 4.0E-04 9.0E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-04 4.5E-04 1.3E-04 3.1E-04

E lb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 5.4 7.9 4.8 6.0

C mg/dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-03 2.2E-03 1.3E-03 1.6E-03

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.9E-04 7.3E-04 4.3E-04 5.5E-04

E lb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 15.5 15.0 21.9 17.5

C mg/dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 4.2E-03 4.1E-03 5.8E-03 4.7E-03

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.4E-03 1.4E-03 1.9E-03 1.6E-03

E lb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 10-3990.14

Intl. Insulation Group Phenix City, AL Cupola Source

Luckett PersonnelM30B Mercury TestingCompany NamePlant Location CityPlant Location StateSource NameSource ID**Intl. Insulation Group Phenix City, AL Michigan Cupola 101** **Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"**Measured Value(mg/dscm)CorrectedConcentration(mg/dscm at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used(EPA Method 30B)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test MethodCommentsCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)**1 10/28/2010 9:15 10/28/2010 11:15 8.59E-06** **N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 2.88E-06** **2 10/28/2010 11:35 10/28/2010 13:35 1.57E-05** **N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 5.27E-06** **3 10/28/2010 13:50 10/28/2010 15:50 8.55E-06** **N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 2.82E-06** Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsTest End TimeRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date**Page 1 of 3 1/28/2011** M30B Mercury TestingQA/QC DocumentationProcessProduction Rate(tons rock/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)Trap IDSection 1Mass (ng)Section 2Mass (ng)TotalMass (ng)InitialSpike(ng)Total Non-Spike (ng)SampleVolume(dscm)VolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough(%)BreaktroughLimit**4.6 1.12 19.76 114,476 89,461 186.33 Moisture and Flows from 0061 Run** **2: 9:15-12:21 R1, A 0.63 0.44 1.07 0 1.07 0.12 2% 70** **4.6 1.13 19.76 114,476 89,461 181.84 Moisture and Flows from 0061 Run** **2: 9:15-12:21 R2, A 1.47 0.48 1.95 0 1.95 0.12 4% 33** **4.6 1.13 19.76 112,633 88,173 180.33 Moisture and Flows from 0061 Run** **3: 12:40-15:45 R3, A 0.58 0.44 1.02 0 1.02 0.12 1% 76** Trap #1≤**20% of field recovery test** ≤**10% of Section 1 Hg mass for** **Hg conc. >1**μ**g/dscm: or**≤**20% of Section 1 for Hg conc.** **≤1 μg/dscm** Flue GasTemperature (F)Other Supporting InformationFlue GasMoisture(%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue Gas FlowRate (dscfm)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)**Page 2 of 3 1/28/2011** M30B Mercury TestingConcentration(μg/dscm)Trap IDSection 1MassSection 2MassTotalMassInitialSpikeTotal Non-SpikeSampleVolumeVolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough (%)BreaktroughLimitConcentration(μg/dscm)Abs. diff. RD (%) LimitCrecR (%) by RunRavg(%)Limit**0.01 R1, B 20.1 0.37 20.47 20 0.47 0.12 2% 2 0.00 0.0 38 0.1594 97** **0.02 R2, B 21.1 0.53 21.63 20 1.63 0.12 4% 3 0.01 0.0 7 0.1653 99** **0.01 R3, B 19.1 0.28 19.38 20 -0.62 0.12 1% 1 0.00 0.0 100 0.1520 92** **Average Recovery,** **between 85 and 115%** Trap #2Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured Spike Recovery ( R )≤**20% of field recovery test** ≤**10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg** **conc. >1**μ**g/dscm: or**≤**20% of Section 1 for Hg conc.≤1** **μg/dscm**≥**10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1** **μg/dscm: or**≤**20% RD or**≤**0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff.** **for Hg conc.**≤1**μg/dscm 96** **Page 3 of 3 1/28/2011** 

## Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing - 0061

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/27/2010 10/28/2010 10/28/2010

Start Run Start Time 12:30:00 9:15:00 12:40:00

Run Finish Time 15:40:00 12:21:00 15:45:00 Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 180



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.293 0.293 0.293 0.293



### C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.805 0.805 0.805 0.81



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.011 1.011 1.011 1.011



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.73 29.92 29.94 29.86



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.44 1.40 1.35 1.40



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 133.725 133.124 131.869 132.906



### t
m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 83.68 77.82 81.44 80.98



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 130.928 132.586 130.528 131.347



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 130.7 135.9 133.2 133.3



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 6.15 6.40 6.27 6.27



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.6



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.955 0.954 0.954 0.954



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.01 1.12 1.13 1.09



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 19.84 19.76 19.76 19.79



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.15 79.12 79.11 79.1



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.96 28.97 28.97 28.97



### M
s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.46 28.46 28.47 28.47



### P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O 0.2 0.20 0.20 0.20



### P
s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.74 29.93 29.95 29.88



### t
s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 199 185 184 189



### ∆ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.318 0.308 0.299 0.308



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 34.1 33.1 32.6 33.3



### A
s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 57.6 57.6 57.6 57.6



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 89,470 89,461

88,173

89,035



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 117,659 114,476

112,633

114,923



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.2 101.5 101.2 101.0



### W p Production, tons rock charged to the cupola per hour



### W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 1.5 0.4 0.4 0.8



### C mg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 4.1E-04 1.1E-04 1.1E-04 2.1E-04



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.4E-04 3.6E-05 3.6E-05 7.0E-05



### E lb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.14

Intl. Insulation Group Phenix City, AL Cupola Source

JOHNSON/LUCKETT Personnel

## Plant Job #

Location HCOH, MeOH, Phenol Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/26/10 10/26/2010 10/26/2010

Start Run Start Time 9:01:00 11:07:00 13:55:00

Run Finish Time 10:14:00 12:17:00 15:07:00
Net Traversing Points 20 20 20



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 64 64 64 64



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308



### C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.804 0.804 0.804 0.80



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.993 0.993 0.993 0.993



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.61 29.55 29.52 29.56



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.27 1.23 1.17 1.22



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 48.255 49.302 50.308 49.288



### t
m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 98.59 103.84 105.63 102.69



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 44.965 45.416 46.144 45.508



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 49.3 52.8 53.8 52.0



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.32 2.49 2.53 2.45



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.9 5.2 5.2 5.1



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.951 0.948 0.948 0.949



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.0



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 18.2 18.2 18.2 18.2



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.70 80.90 80.70 80.77



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.90 28.87 28.90 28.89



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.37 28.31 28.34 28.34



### P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.66 29.60 29.57 29.61



### t
s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 553 555 565 557



### ∆ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.406 0.389 0.373 0.389



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 47.9 47.0 46.3 47.1



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 5,226 5,089

4,957

5,091



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 10,632 10,425

10,268

10,442



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 96.8 100.2 104.4 100.5



### W p Production, tons rock charged to the cupola per hour



### W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 19,800 19,000 20,000 19,600



### C mg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 1.6E+01 1.5E+01 1.5E+01 1.5E+01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.0E-01 2.8E-01 2.8E-01 2.9E-01



### E lb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 70 29 35 45



### C mg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 5.5E-02 2.3E-02 2.7E-02 3.5E-02



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-03 4.3E-04 5.0E-04 6.7E-04



### E lb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 238 129 136 168



### C mg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E-01 1.0E-01 1.0E-01 1.3E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.7E-03 1.9E-03 1.9E-03 2.5E-03



### E lb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.14

Int. Insulation Group
Phenix City, AL Curing Oven Stack

LEE Personnel

### Plant Job #

Location OTM27/OTM 28 Testing

**Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number**  1 2 3 Average

**Date Test Date** 10/26/2010 10/26/2010 10/27/2010

**Start Run Start Time** 10:10:00 14:15:00 8:37:00

**Run Finish Time** 13:28:34 17:39:34 11:56:09
**Net Traversing Points** 12 12 12



### Θ **Net Run Time, minutes** 194.84 194.8 191.26 194



### D N **Nozzle Diameter, inches** 0.212 0.212 0.212 0.212



### C p **Pitot Tube Coeficient** 0.804 0.804 0.804 0.80



### Y **Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor** 1.011 1.011 1.011 1.011



### P Br **Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury** 29.60 29.60 29.78 29.66



### ∆ H **Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2**  **O** 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40



### V

m **Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet** 73.961 76.022 73.716 74.566



### t

m **Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F** 81.00 84.88 79.75 81.88



### V mstd **Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf** 72.269 73.755 72.635 72.886



### V lc **Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml** 78.4 74.5 68.7 73.9



### V wstd **Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet** 3.69 3.51 3.23 3.48



### % H 2 

### O **Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %** 4.9 4.5 4.3 4.6



### M fd **Dry Mole Fraction** 0.951 0.955 0.957 0.954



### %CO 2 **Carbon Dioxide, %** 0.96 0.87 1.01 0.95



### %O 2 **Oxygen, %** 19.78 19.73 19.62 19.71



### % CO+ N 2 **Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, %** 79.26 79.4 79.37 79.3



### M d **Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole** 28.94 28.93 28.95 28.94



### M

s **Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole** 28.41 28.43 28.48 28.44



### P g **Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2**  **O** 0.3 0.30 0.20 0.27



### P

s **Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury** 29.62 29.62 29.79 29.68



### t
s **Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F** 192 190 201 195



### ∆ P avg **Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2**  **O** 0.332 0.336 0.334 0.334



### v s **Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second** 34.7 34.9 34.9 34.8



### A

s **Stack Crossectional Area, square feet** 57.6 57.6 57.6 57.6



### Q sd **Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm** 91,367 92,480

91,730

91,859



### Q

aw **Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm** 119,839 120,492

120,483

120,272



### %I **Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %** 95.6 95.8 98.1 96.5



### W p **Production, tons rock charged to the cupola per hour**



### W **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Catch Weight, mg** 33.40 24.70 43.80 33.97



### C mg/dscm **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm** 1.6E+01 1.2E+01 2.1E+01 1.6E+01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2**  N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/hr** 5.6E+00 4.1E+00 7.3E+00 5.7E+00



### E lb/ton product **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/ton product**



### W **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Catch Weight, mg** 1.7 3.5 1.7 2.3



### C mg/dscm **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm** 8.3E-01 1.7E+00 8.3E-01 1.1E+00



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2**  N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/hr** 2.8E-01 5.8E-01 2.8E-01 3.8E-01



### E lb/ton product **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/ton product**



### W **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Catch Weight, mg** 39 47 49 45



### C mg/dscm **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm** 1.9E+01 2.3E+01 2.4E+01 2.2E+01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2**  N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/hr** 6.5E+00 7.8E+00 8.2E+00 7.5E+00



### E lb/ton product **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/ton product**



### W **Total PM 2.5**  **Catch Weight, mg** 74.1 75.2 94.5 81.3



### C mg/dscm **Total PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm** 3.6E+01 3.6E+01 4.6E+01 3.9E+01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 **Total PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2**  N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr **Total PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/hr** 1.2E+01 1.2E+01 1.6E+01 1.4E+01



### E lb/ton product **Total PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/ton product** 

### 10-3990.14

Intl. Insulation Group
Phenix City, AL Cupola Source

J Johnson Personnel

# APPENDIX B

PROCESS DATA

# APPENDIX C

FIELD AND COMPUTER

GENERATED DATA

SHEETS AND NOTESBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.14Probe #OTM27-IPollutantPM2.5Points/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIntl. Insulation GroupDGM #T5-2MethodOTM27/28Total Points12LocationPhenix City, ALRate (cfm)Run #1Time/pt (min)16.24SourceCupolaDelta ∆H@ Date10/26/10Time/reading16.24OperatorJ JohnsonBws (%)4.86# of Ports Total Run min194.84Filter Number Condensate Volume60.3Cp0.804Ps (in Hg)29.62Barometric29.60Silica Gel Weight Gain18.1DGM Y1.011Pm (in Hg)29.60Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)0.3Actual Dn (in)0.212O2 (%)19.78Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)8.563An (ft^2)0.00025CO2 (%)0.96Md28.94Stack Area (sf)57.59Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.41Act. Flow (cfm)119,839Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 72.25Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)96,032Moisture % 4.86Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)91,367.Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.60.0 12.7 10:10483.37 0.20 193 75 77 0.4 252 80 67 6512.7 29.4 10:22488.01 0.35 191 77 76 0.4 251 77 59 6429.4 47.1 10:39494.26 0.39 195 82 77 0.4 247 76 57 6347.1 64.6 10:57500.62 0.38 196 83 78 0.4 251 77 60 6264.6 81.1 11:14507.01 0.34 193 84 79 0.4 252 79 65 6181.1 95.3 11:31513.20 0.25 195 84 78 0.4 250 79 66 6195.3 109.7 11:49518.83 0.26 194 82 80 0.4 251 81 65 62109.7 126.2 12:03525.06 0.34 192 83 80 0.4 252 82 64 63126.2 144.4 12:19531.63 0.41 193 86 81 0.4 253 80 63 64144.4 161.8 12:38538.33 0.38 180 85 81 0.4 252 80 62 65161.8 178.8 12:55544.76 0.36 192 86 82 0.4 250 80 61 66178.8 194.8 13:12550.98 0.32 194 86 82 0.4 251 79 60 7194.8 13:28557.33Average:73.960.33 192.3 82.8 79.3#DIV/0!0.40 251 79 62.4166667 6Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.14Probe #OTM27-IPollutantPM2.5Points/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIntl. Insulation GroupDGM #T5-2MethodOTM27/28Total Points120.000 @ 15"LocationPhenix City, ALRate (cfm)Run #2Time/pt (min)16.3 0.000 @ 10"SourceCupolaDelta ∆H@ Date10/26/10Time/reading16.3OperatorJohnsonBws (%)4.5# of Ports2Total Run196.0Filter Number Condensate Volume56.5Cp0.804Ps (in Hg)29.62Barometric29.60Silica Gel Weight Gain18DGM Y1.011Pm (in Hg)29.60Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)0.3Actual Dn (in)0.212O2 (%)19.73Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)8.56An (ft^2)0.00025CO2 (%)0.87Md28.93Stack Area (sf)57.59Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.43Act. Flow (cfm)120,492Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 73.74Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)96,877Moisture % 4.54Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)92,480Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.60.0 12.7 14:15557.669 0.22 199 81 81 0.4 252 79 65 4.0512.7 29.4 14:27563.210 0.29 200 84 81 0.4 253 74 58 4.5429.4 47.1 14:44569.610 0.35 199 85 82 0.4 256 76 60 4.5347.1 64.6 15:02576.520 0.34 203 89 83 0.4 252 74 64 4.5264.6 81.1 15:19583.230 0.37 186 86 83 0.4 251 73 63 4.5181.1 95.3 15:36589.850 0.29 190 87 84 0.4 253 72 62 4.5695.3 109.7 16:00595.931 0.28 187 84 84 0.4 252 73 61 4.55109.7 126.2 16:14600.730 0.38 198 86 84 0.4 253 72 60 4.54126.2 144.4 16:30607.180 0.39 200 88 84 0.4 254 69 60 4.53144.4 161.8 16:49614.110 0.41 169 88 85 0.4 253 68 60 4.52161.8 178.8 17:06620.860 0.35 172 89 84 0.4 252 69 61 4.51178.8 194.8 17:23627.560 0.36 179 90 85 0.4 252 68 63 4.5194.8 17:39633.691Average:76.020.34 190.2 86.4 83.3#DIV/0!0.40 252.8 72.3 61.4 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.14Probe #53-10-1PollutantPM2.5Points/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIntl. Insulation GroupDGM #OTM27 - IMethodOTM27/28Total Points120.000 @ 15"LocationPhenix City, ALRate (cfm)Run #3Time/pt (min)15.9 0.000 @ 9.5"SourceCupolaDelta ∆H@ Date10/27/10Time/reading15.9OperatorJ JohnsonBws (%)4.3# of Ports2Total Run191.3Filter Number Condensate Volume50.9Cp0.804Ps (in Hg)29.79Barometric29.78Silica Gel Weight Gain17.8DGM Y1.011Pm (in Hg)29.78Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)0.2Actual Dn (in)0.212O2 (%)19.62Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)8.56An (ft^2)0.00025CO2 (%)1.01Md28.95Stack Area (sf)57.59Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.48Act. Flow (cfm)120,483Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 72.60Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)95,814Moisture % 4.26Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)91,730Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 11.8 8:37633.89 0.18 194 71 70 0.4 253 80 65 4211.8 27.2 8:48639.57 0.31 198 78 73 0.4 252 77 64 5327.2 44.5 9:04646.11 0.39 201 83 74 0.4 253 76 62 5444.5 61.6 9:21652.86 0.38 206 83 75 0.4 252 77 63 5561.6 79.2 9:38659.66 0.40 197 84 77 0.4 251 76 58 5679.2 95.1 9:56666.07 0.33 201 83 78 0.4 247 75 58 5195.1 108.1 10:20672.33 0.22 204 82 81 0.4 250 77 63 52108.1 125.0 10:33677.64 0.37 202 84 79 0.4 251 74 64 53125.0 142.5 10:49683.12 0.40 196 85 79 0.4 252 75 63 54142.5 159.2 11:07689.56 0.36 209 84 80 0.4 254 73 62 55159.2 175.6 11:24695.82 0.35 202 85 80 0.4 251 74 62 56175.6 191.3 11:40702.13 0.32 204 85 81 0.4 252 75 63 5191.3 11:56707.61Average:73.720.33 201.2 82.3 77.3#DIV/0!0.40 251.5 75.8 62.25 4.5Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.14Probe #T5-10-1PollutantMETALSPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIntl. Insulation GroupDGM #T5-1Method29Total Points1215" 0.003LocationPhenix City, ALRate (cfm)0.673Run #1Time/pt (min)16.0 8" 0.000SourceCupolaDelta ∆H@ Date10/26/10Time/reading4.0OperatorLuckettBws (%)4.80# of Ports2Total Run192.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume113.9Cp0.805Ps (in Hg)29.62Barometric29.60Silica Gel Weight Gain24.4DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)29.60Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)0.3Actual Dn (in)0.280O2 (%)19.78Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)8.563An (ft^2)0.00043CO2 (%)0.96Md28.94Stack Area (sf)57.59Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.42Act. Flow (cfm)116,323Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 128.85Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)129.2Wet Ref Flow (cfm)93,669Moisture %4.81Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)89,174Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 10:10794.355 0.30 195 84 820.001.15 232 268 69 414.0 8.0 10:14797.96 0.28 195 80 780.001.1 241 255 56 418.0 12.0 10:18799.65 0.31 196 83 780.001.2 243 260 51 4112.0 16.0 10:22802.37 0.30 192 86 770.001.15 241 237 50 4216.0 20.0 10:26805.13 0.35 198 89 780.001.35 241 238 50 5220.0 24.0 10:30807.99 0.34 197 90 780.001.3 250 242 49 5224.0 28.0 10:34811.05 0.34 195 91 780.001.3 239 243 50 5228.0 32.0 10:38813.84 0.34 197 93 790.001.3 239 248 50 5332.0 36.0 10:42816.85 0.35 195 93 790.001.35 247 240 50 5336.0 40.0 10:46819.75 0.35 197 93 800.001.35 247 243 50 5340.0 44.0 10:50822.55 0.34 198 94 800.001.3 246 248 51 5344.0 48.0 10:54825.6 0.37 194 95 810.001.4 241 249 51 5448.0 52.0 10:58828.64 0.35 195 96 820.001.35 240 256 51 5452.0 56.0 11:02831.55 0.35 199 97 830.001.35 237 262 50 5456.0 60.0 11:06834.38 0.34 191 97 830.001.3 241 253 52 5460.0 64.0 11:10837.33 0.35 193 97 840.001.35 236 250 53 5564.0 68.0 11:14840.22 0.32 194 96 850.001.25 253 247 53 5568.0 72.0 11:18843.25 0.31 192 97 840.001.2 251 266 53 5572.0 76.0 11:22846.06 0.31 190 98 850.001.2 247 260 53 5576.0 80.0 11:26848.8 0.31 189 98 850.001.2 245 262 54 5680.0 84.0 11:30851.81 0.22 188 99 860.000.85 240 267 55 4684.0 88.0 11:34854.15 0.22 181 99 860.000.85 241 262 56 4688.0 92.0 11:38856.46 0.22 184 100 870.000.85 253 253 57 4692.0 96.0 11:42858.75 0.22 189 100 880.000.85 238 238 59 4196.0 100.0 11:51861.293 0.26 184 97 900.001 237 240 67 51100.0 104.0 11:55863.72 0.25 188 95 890.000.97 241 251 55 51104.0 108.0 11:59866.54 0.25 186 97 880.000.97 246 241 54 51108.0 112.0 12:03869.21 0.25 189 99 880.000.97 248 256 53 52112.0 116.0 12:07872.36 0.31 191 100 880.001.2 251 253 53 52116.0 120.0 12:11873.9 0.31 191 100 880.001.2 246 244 52 52120.0 124.0 12:15876.6 0.31 189 100 890.001.2 237 232 51 52124.0 128.0 12:19879.4 0.34 192 100 880.001.3 241 236 51 53128.0 132.0 12:23882.3 0.34 195 100 890.001.3 245 237 52 53132.0 136.0 12:27885.25 0.34 190 100 880.001.3 244 237 53 53136.0 140.0 12:31888.35 0.34 187 100 890.001.3 243 235 53 53140.0 144.0 12:35891.46 0.33 188 100 890.001.25 242 251 54 54144.0 148.0 12:39894.25 0.38 169 101 900.001.5 241 246 54 54148.0 152.0 12:43897.21 0.38 168 101 900.001.5 245 241 54 54152.0 156.0 12:47900.4 0.40 162 100 910.001.55 253 243 54 64156.0 160.0 12:51903.52 0.36 186 100 900.001.4 252 241 55 65160.0 164.0 12:55906.63 0.32 192 100 910.001.25 253 233 56 55164.0 168.0 12:59909.21 0.32 192 101 910.001.25 251 238 56 55168.0 172.0 13:03912.11 0.36 184 102 910.001.4 253 250 56 55172.0 176.0 13:07915.45 0.36 166 102 910.001.4 251 253 55 56176.0 180.0 13:11918.46 0.25 180 102 920.000.97 243 249 56 56180.0 184.0 13:15921.1 0.24 193 102 910.000.93 240 247 57 56184.0 188.0 13:19923.4 0.26 191 103 920.001 250 243 58 56188.0 192.0 13:23926 0.24 193 104 920.000.93 243 233 57 5192.0 13:27928.519Average:134.160.31 189.2 96.9 85.90.001.21 244 247 53.9375 5Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.14Probe #T5-10-1PollutantMETALSPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIntl. Insulation GroupDGM #T5-1Method29Total Points1214:15 17:3616.0/0.000 10.0/0.000LocationPhenix City, ALRate (cfm)0.675Run #2Time/pt (min)16.0SourceCupolaDelta ∆H@ Date10/26/10Time/reading4.0OperatorLuckettBws (%)4.4# of Ports2Total Run192.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume95.8Cp0.805Ps (in Hg)29.46Barometric29.44Silica Gel Weight Gain29.6DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)29.44Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)0.3Actual Dn (in)0.280O2 (%)19.73Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)8.56An (ft^2)0.00043CO2 (%)0.87Md28.93Stack Area (sf)57.59Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.45Act. Flow (cfm)116,911Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 129.35Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)129.6Wet Ref Flow (cfm)95,146Moisture %4.36Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)91,003Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 14:15929.297 0.22 188 87 870.000.85 243 261 71 414.0 8.0 14:19931.6 0.23 180 86 870.000.89 245 257 67 418.0 12.0 14:23933.99 0.22 194 90 850.000.85 250 248 57 4112.0 16.0 14:27936.4 0.25 200 92 850.000.97 251 252 57 4216.0 20.0 14:31938.94 0.32 192 93 850.001.25 246 245 57 5220.0 24.0 14:35941.6 0.32 190 95 850.001.25 241 250 57 5224.0 28.0 14:39944 0.31 188 96 850.001.2 243 250 58 5228.0 32.0 14:43947.11 0.31 189 98 870.001.2 250 251 61 5332.0 36.0 14:47949.86 0.31 198 99 870.001.2 251 256 58 5336.0 40.0 14:51951.99 0.35 185 99 870.001.35 247 251 60 5340.0 44.0 14:55954.21 0.34 186 99 880.001.3 240 241 60 5344.0 48.0 14:59957.82 0.34 191 100 880.001.3 242 246 60 5448.0 52.0 15:03960.27 0.36 196 101 890.001.4 246 243 61 6452.0 56.0 15:07963.86 0.37 201 100 890.001.45 251 247 63 6456.0 60.0 15:11966.91 0.35 194 100 900.001.35 253 251 63 6460.0 64.0 15:15969.95 0.38 195 101 900.001.5 254 250 62 6564.0 68.0 15:19973.11 0.33 189 101 900.001.3 251 246 62 6568.0 72.0 15:23975.99 0.33 189 101 910.001.3 253 248 64 6572.0 76.0 15:27979.05 0.32 194 101 910.001.25 250 250 62 6576.0 80.0 12:31981.99 0.32 194 101 910.001.25 251 247 61 6680.0 84.0 15:35984.92 0.23 189 101 920.000.89 250 248 62 5684.0 88.0 15:39987.39 0.22 187 102 910.000.85 250 249 65 5688.0 92.0 15:43989.6 0.22 185 103 920.000.85 246 242 63 5692.0 96.0 15:47992.25 0.24 183 104 920.000.93 250 247 65 5196.0 100.0 16:00994.623 0.31 182 101 840.001.2 242 258 71 51100.0 104.0 16:04997.94 0.30 178 93 920.001.15 243 256 61 51104.0 108.0 16:081000.03 0.31 168 96 920.001.2 241 265 57 51108.0 112.0 16:121003.04 0.31 162 97 910.001.2 232 262 56 52112.0 116.0 16:161005.88 0.33 165 99 910.001.3 239 261 56 52116.0 120.0 16:201008.8 0.35 162 100 910.001.35 241 267 56 52120.0 124.0 16:241011.68 0.36 158 101 910.001.4 246 256 55 62124.0 128.0 16:281014.86 0.36 157 101 920.001.4 243 260 56 63128.0 132.0 16:321017.82 0.36 157 101 910.001.4 238 257 56 63132.0 136.0 16:361020.89 0.36 158 101 920.001.4 239 251 56 63136.0 140.0 16:401023.92 0.38 153 102 920.001.45 240 250 58 63140.0 144.0 16:441026.97 0.37 153 102 920.001.45 241 256 58 64144.0 148.0 16:481030.18 0.36 151 102 930.001.4 241 260 58 64148.0 152.0 16:521033.35 0.36 153 103 930.001.4 246 263 59 64152.0 156.0 16:561036.19 0.35 166 103 930.001.35 239 253 60 64156.0 160.0 17:001039.2 0.33 172 102 930.001.3 240 244 61 65160.0 164.0 17:041041.59 0.32 173 102 940.001.25 252 246 61 65164.0 168.0 17:081045.41 0.33 176 102 930.001.3 243 256 62 65168.0 172.0 17:121048.22 0.33 182 102 940.001.3 240 250 62 65172.0 176.0 17:161051 0.33 175 102 930.001.3 241 246 62 66176.0 180.0 17:201053.94 0.32 175 102 940.001.25 240 241 61 66180.0 184.0 17:241056.83 0.33 174 102 930.001.3 240 239 62 66184.0 188.0 17:281059.71 0.33 178 102 940.001.3 239 241 62 66188.0 192.0 17:321062.59 0.34 180 102 930.001.3 238 240 62 6192.0 17:361065.567Average:136.270.32 178.9 99.4 90.30.001.24 244.5 251.1 60.5 5Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.14Probe #T5-10-1PollutantMETALSPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIntl. Insulation GroupDGM #T5-1Method29Total Points128:37 11:5616.0/0.000 12.0/0.000LocationPhenix City, ALRate (cfm)0.698Run #3Time/pt (min)16SourceCupolaDelta ∆H@ Date10/27/10Time/reading4OperatorLuckettBws (%)5.0# of Ports2Total Run192.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume115.3Cp0.805Ps (in Hg)29.80Barometric29.78Silica Gel Weight Gain34.6DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)29.78Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)0.3Actual Dn (in)0.280O2 (%)19.62Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)8.56An (ft^2)0.00043CO2 (%)1.01Md28.95Stack Area (sf)57.59Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.40Act. Flow (cfm)119,355Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 133.62Preliminary dP (in H20)0.32Total Vol.(cf)134.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)94,751Moisture %5.02Preliminary Ts (oF)202Est. Us (ft/s)34.4Dry Ref Flow (cfm)90,010Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.3175Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 8:37113.460 0.27 193 75 720.001.05 229 234 67 514.0 8.0 8:41116.02 0.27 193 75 720.001.05 230 237 61 518.0 12.0 8:45119.46 0.27 195 84 730.001.05 229 241 61 5112.0 16.0 8:49121.05 0.27 192 86 740.001.05 229 239 61 5216.0 20.0 8:05123.78 0.32 198 89 750.001.25 231 238 61 5220.0 24.0 8:57126.82 0.32 198 91 750.001.25 234 238 60 5224.0 28.0 9:01129.66 0.32 197 92 750.001.25 233 241 60 5228.0 32.0 9:05132.02 0.32 193 92 750.001.25 230 241 59 5332.0 36.0 9:09134.65 0.38 171 93 760.001.45 229 243 58 5336.0 40.0 9:13137.88 0.38 184 93 760.001.45 232 244 58 5340.0 44.0 9:17140.69 0.38 189 93 770.001.45 233 243 58 5344.0 48.0 9:21143.64 0.38 198 94 780.001.45 232 240 59 5448.0 52.0 9:25147.71 0.38 207 95 780.001.45 234 239 60 5452.0 56.0 9:29149.81 0.38 203 95 780.001.45 231 239 60 5456.0 60.0 9:33152.53 0.38 200 96 790.001.45 230 241 60 5460.0 64.0 9:37156.21 0.38 205 96 800.001.45 229 247 61 5564.0 68.0 9:41158.64 0.34 208 96 800.001.3 231 248 61 5568.0 72.0 9:45161.29 0.34 207 96 810.001.3 231 245 62 5572.0 76.0 9:49164.19 0.34 203 97 820.001.3 234 246 62 5576.0 80.0 9:53167.82 0.34 204 97 820.001.3 232 247 62 5680.0 84.0 9:57170.04 0.23 200 97 830.000.89 230 254 62 5684.0 88.0 10:01172.42 0.23 200 97 840.000.89 231 253 62 5688.0 92.0 10:05174.47 0.23 196 97 840.000.89 234 250 62 5692.0 96.0 10:09177.31 0.23 216 97 840.000.89 232 251 63 5196.0 100.0 10:20179.685 0.33 205 90 860.001.25 229 256 65 5.51100.0 104.0 10:24182.36 0.33 205 90 850.001.25 232 261 59 61104.0 108.0 10:28185.61 0.33 209 92 850.001.25 231 264 58 61108.0 112.0 10:32188.3 0.33 208 94 850.001.25 235 269 60 62112.0 116.0 10:36190.99 0.38 205 95 860.001.45 237 267 60 72116.0 120.0 10:40194.41 0.38 211 96 860.001.45 236 266 60 72120.0 124.0 10:44197.53 0.38 205 96 860.001.45 236 262 60 72124.0 128.0 10:48200.95 0.38 214 95 860.001.45 230 258 61 73128.0 132.0 10:52204.17 0.38 180 95 870.001.45 231 258 61 73132.0 136.0 10:56208.69 0.38 213 96 870.001.45 229 249 61 73136.0 140.0 11:00211.28 0.38 214 97 870.001.45 230 245 62 73140.0 144.0 11:04213.84 0.38 220 97 870.001.45 230 249 61 74144.0 148.0 11:08217.02 0.35 214 97 870.001.35 229 248 60 74148.0 152.0 11:12220.22 0.35 210 98 870.001.35 232 244 59 74152.0 156.0 11:16223.35 0.35 218 98 870.001.35 232 245 59 74156.0 160.0 11:20226.25 0.35 216 98 880.001.35 230 242 59 75160.0 164.0 11:24229.30 0.30 215 98 880.001.15 228 239 59 65164.0 168.0 11:28232.58 0.30 215 97 880.001.15 227 240 59 65168.0 172.0 11:32235.91 0.30 215 97 880.001.15 226 239 60 65172.0 176.0 11:36238.08 0.30 204 98 880.001.15 229 238 60 66176.0 180.0 11:40240.86 0.23 213 98 880.000.89 231 238 60 66180.0 184.0 11:44243.31 0.23 204 98 880.000.89 22 240 61 66184.0 188.0 11:48245.7 0.23 180 98 880.000.89 231 241 61 66188.0 192.0 11:52248.14 0.23 176 98 880.000.89 229 244 61 6192.0 11:56250.985Average:137.530.32 202.5 94.1 82.50.001.24 226.7 246.7 60.5416667 5.7Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1CompanyIntl. Insulation GroupDGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points2Location Phenix City, ALRate (L/m)1 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) N/ASource Cupola Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 28-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator JONESBws (%)# of Ports 2 Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)29.81Barometric29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)0.2Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)19.76 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 8.563 An (ft^2)57.58930CO2 (%)1.12Md28.97Stack Area (sf)57.59Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.97Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B9:15:00 AM 0.0 1831 1 3 4 121.934 0.887 77 76 78 769:20:00 AM 5.0 1831 1 3 4 126.820 5.430 78 77 78 769:25:00 AM 10.0 1851 1 3 4 132.230 9.840 80 79 79 769:30:00 AM 15.0 1861 1 3 4 137.670 14.050 81 80 80 779:35:00 AM 20.0 1831 1 3 4 142.920 18.350 83 80 81 789:40:00 AM 25.0 1861 1 3 4 148.390 23.050 84 80 82 799:45:00 AM 30.0 1861 1 3 4 153.930 28.490 84 81 82 809:50:00 AM 35.0 1851 1 3 4 159.410 33.950 85 82 83 809:55:00 AM 40.0 1861 1 3 4 164.950 39.370 86 82 84 8110:00:00 AM 45.0 1861 1 3 4 170.490 44.820 87 83 85 8110:05:00 AM 50.0 1861 1 3 4 175.510 50.070 87 83 85 8110:10:00 AM 55.0 1861 1 3 4.5 180.730 55.300 87 83 85 8110:15:00 AM 60.0 1861 1 3 4.5 185.770 60.560 87 84 86 8210:20:00 AM 65.0 1871 1 3 4.5 190.890 65.800 88 84 86 8210:25:00 AM 70.0 1871 1 3.5 4.5 196.010 71.050 88 84 86 8210:30:00 AM 75.0 1881 1 3.5 4.5 201.150 76.300 88 85 87 8210:35:00 AM 80.0 1881 1 3.5 4.5 206.210 81.540 89 85 87 8210:40:00 AM 85.0 1881 1 3.5 4.5 211.590 86.890 89 85 87 8310:45:00 AM 90.0 1861 1 4 4.5 216.970 92.100 89 86 87 8310:50:00 AM 95.0 1871 1 4 4.5 222.230 97.370 89 86 87 8310:55:00 AM 100.0 1881 1 4 4.5 227.660 102.650 89 87 88 8411:00:00 AM 105.0 1881 1 4 4.5 233.440 107.890 89 87 88 8411:05:00 AM 110.0 1891 1 4 5 239.220 114.160 88 87 88 8411:10:00 AM 115.0 1891 1.5 4 5 245.020 121.431 88 87 88 8411:15:00 AM 120.0251.164 126.704Average 120.0 186.3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!85.83333333 83.04166667 84.45833333 80.875Volume129.230 125.817dscm0.12 0.12Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Trap/ Probe TempPost Test20.0"@0.00 18.0"@0.00 17.0"@0.00 9.0"@0.00Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedExit Meter Temp (*F)Pre Test Post Test Pre TestBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1CompanyIntl. Insulation GroupDGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points2Location Phenix City, ALRate (L/m)1 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/ASource Cupola Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 28-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator JONESBws (%)# of Ports 2 Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)29.83Barometric29.82 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y0.991Pm (in Hg)29.82Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)0.2Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)19.76 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 8.56 An (ft^2)57.58930CO2 (%)1.13Md28.97Stack Area (sf)57.59Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.97Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B11:35:00 AM 0.0 1881 1 3 2.5 0.893 0.632 85 84 85 8411:40:00 AM 5.0 1881 1 3 2.5 6.710 5.850 85 84 85 8411:45:00 AM 10.0 1871 1 3 2.5 12.670 11.070 85 84 85 8411:50:00 AM 15.0 1861 1 3 2.5 18.540 16.230 86 84 85 8411:55:00 AM 20.0 1851 1 3 2.5 24.610 21.510 86 85 85 8412:00:00 PM 25.0 1841 1 3 2.5 30.770 26.790 87 85 86 8412:05:00 PM 30.0 1821 1 3 2.5 36.990 32.070 87 85 86 8412:10:00 PM 35.0 1821 1 3 2.5 43.140 37.350 88 85 87 8412:15:00 PM 40.0 1811 1 3 3 49.190 42.630 88 86 87 8512:20:00 PM 45.0 1811 1 3 3 55.810 48.170 88 86 87 8512:25:00 PM 50.0 1801 1 3 3 62.140 53.850 89 87 88 8512:30:00 PM 55.0 1821 1 3 3 66.780 57.790 89 87 88 8512:35:00 PM 60.0 1811 1 3 3 72.410 62.880 90 87 88 8512:40:00 PM 65.0 1811 1 3 3 78.050 67.970 90 87 88 8512:45:00 PM 70.0 1791 1 3 3 83.660 73.060 90 87 89 8512:50:00 PM 75.0 1791 1 3 3 89.310 78.140 90 87 89 8512:55:00 PM 80.0 1801 1 3 3 94.680 83.480 90 87 89 851:00:00 PM 85.0 1801 1 3 3 99.130 88.310 91 88 89 851:05:00 PM 90.0 1801 1 3 3 103.540 93.140 91 88 90 861:10:00 PM 95.0 1801 1 3 3.5 107.960 97.990 91 88 90 861:15:00 PM 100.0 1801 1 3 3.5 112.360 102.790 91 88 90 861:20:00 PM 105.0 1801 1 3 3.5 116.830 108.030 91 88 90 871:25:00 PM 110.0 1801 1 3 3.5 121.230 113.650 91 89 90 871:30:00 PM 115.0 1801 1 3 3.5 125.630 119.180 91 89 90 871:35:00 PM 120.0 180130.163 124.712Average 120.0 181.8 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!88.75 86.46 87.75 85.04Volume129.270 124.080dscm0.12 0.12Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedExit Meter Temp (*F)Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test17.0"@0.00 8.0"@0.009.0"@0.0016.5"@0.00Trap/ Probe TempBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1CompanyIntl. Insulation GroupDGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points2Location Phenix City, ALRate (L/m)1 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/ASource Cupola Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 28-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator JONESBws (%)# of Ports 2 Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)29.93Barometric29.92 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y Pm (in Hg)29.92Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)0.2Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)19.76 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 8.56 An (ft^2)57.58930CO2 (%)1.13Md28.97Stack Area (sf)57.59Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.97Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B1:50:00 PM 0.0 1791 1 3 2 0.315 0.476 90 81 90 811:55:00 PM 5.0 1801 1 3 2 5.360 5.690 90 81 90 812:00:00 PM 10.0 1811 1 3 2 10.399 10.890 91 82 90 812:05:00 PM 15.0 1811 1 3 2 15.440 15.960 91 82 90 812:10:00 PM 20.0 1821 1 3 2 20.480 21.040 91 82 90 812:15:00 PM 25.0 1821 1 3 2 25.520 26.090 91 82 90 812:20:00 PM 30.0 1831 1 3 2 30.560 31.150 91 82 90 812:25:00 PM 35.0 1831 1 3 2 35.600 36.170 91 82 90 812:30:00 PM 40.0 1841 1 3 2 40.540 41.170 91 82 90 812:35:00 PM 45.0 1841 1 3.5 3 45.850 46.460 91 82 90 812:40:00 PM 50.0 1841 1 3.5 3 51.100 51.710 91 82 90 812:45:00 PM 55.0 1831 1 3.5 3 56.360 57.010 91 82 90 812:50:00 PM 60.0 1821 1 4 3 61.610 62.230 91 82 90 812:55:00 PM 65.0 1821 1 4 3 66.860 67.460 91 82 90 813:00:00 PM 70.0 1801 1 4 3 72.140 72.670 92 83 91 813:05:00 PM 75.0 1791 1 4 3 77.420 77.890 93 84 92 823:10:00 PM 80.0 1771 1 4 3 82.700 83.110 94 84 92 833:15:00 PM 85.0 1771 1 4 3 87.970 88.310 95 85 93 833:20:00 PM 90.0 1761 1 4 3 93.310 93.520 94 85 93 833:25:00 PM 95.0 1761 1 4 3 98.790 98.920 94 84 93 823:30:00 PM 100.0 1771 1 4 3 103.930 103.890 94 84 93 823:35:00 PM 105.0 1771 1 4 3 109.210 109.850 94 83 93 823:40:00 PM 110.0 1791 1 4 3 114.470 114.280 93 83 91 823:45:00 PM 115.0 1801 1 4 3 119.760 119.500 93 83 91 823:50:00 PM 120.0125.021 124.533Average 120.0 180.3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!92 82.67 90.92 81.50Volume124.706 124.057dscm0.12 0.12Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Trap/ Probe TempPost Test18.0"@0.00 9.0"@0.00 20.0"@0.00 7.0"@0.00Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedExit Meter Temp (*F)Pre Test Post Test Pre TestBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.14Probe #T5-10-1PollutantHaxavalent ChromiumPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIntl. Insulation GroupDGM #T5-2Method0061Total Points1212:30 15:4015.5/0.002 7.5/0.002LocationPhenix City, ALRate (cfm)0.727Run #1Time/pt (min)15.0SourceCupolaDelta ∆H@ Date10/27/10Time/reading5.0OperatorJOHNSON/LUCKETTBws (%)4.49# of Ports2Total Run180.0Filter Number Condensate Volume101.5Cp0.805Ps (in Hg)29.74Barometric29.73Silica Gel Weight Gain29.2DGM Y1.011Pm (in Hg)29.84Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)0.2Actual Dn (in)0.293O2 (%)19.84Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)8.563An (ft^2)0.00047CO2 (%)1.01Md28.96Stack Area (sf)57.59Est.DH(in H2O)1.45Ms28.46Act. Flow (cfm)117,659Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 130.53Preliminary dP (in H20)0.32Total Vol.(cf)130.9Wet Ref Flow (cfm)93,674Moisture % 4.50Preliminary Ts (oF)189Est. Us (ft/s)34.1Dry Ref Flow (cfm)89,470Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.3151Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 12:30708.661 0.23 198 78 790.001.05 247 67 515.0 10.0 12:35711.92 0.23 200 79 790.001.05 251 66 5110.0 15.0 12:40715.13 0.23 203 81 790.001.05 250 64 5215.0 20.0 12:45718.391 0.33 209 83 790.001.5 252 65 5.5220.0 25.0 12:50722.21 0.33 208 83 790.001.5 251 64 5.5225.0 30.0 12:55726.16 0.33 203 85 790.001.5 250 63 5.5330.0 35.0 13:00729.75 0.35 196 86 790.001.6 240 62 5.5335.0 40.0 13:05733.68 0.35 194 86 790.001.6 241 61 5.5340.0 45.0 13:10737.12 0.35 192 88 800.001.6 242 62 5.5445.0 50.0 13:15741.62 0.41 190 89 810.001.85 240 60 6450.0 55.0 13:20745.07 0.41 197 88 810.001.85 240 61 6455.0 60.0 13:25750.41 0.41 193 87 810.001.85 241 60 6560.0 65.0 13:30754.14 0.37 197 88 810.001.65 237 61 6565.0 70.0 13:35758.25 0.37 199 87 810.001.65 235 62 6570.0 75.0 13:40762.26 0.37 204 88 810.001.65 232 63 6675.0 80.0 13:45766.40 0.29 200 87 810.001.3 231 62 6680.0 85.0 13:50769.97 0.29 202 87 810.001.3 230 61 6685.0 90.0 13:55773.40 0.29 200 87 810.001.3 233 61 6190.0 95.0 14:10777.052 0.32 203 82 790.001.45 234 63 6195.0 100.0 14:15781.11 0.32 201 84 810.001.45 233 62 61100.0 105.0 14:20784.63 0.32 200 85 810.001.45 232 63 62105.0 110.0 14:25788.12 0.34 197 87 810.001.55 236 64 62110.0 115.0 14:30792.27 0.34 197 87 810.001.55 237 64 62115.0 120.0 14:35796.12 0.34 194 87 810.001.55 232 63 63120.0 125.0 14:40799.54 0.37 202 88 810.001.65 234 62 63125.0 130.0 14:45802.98 0.37 201 88 820.001.65 233 60 63130.0 135.0 14:50806.99 0.37 202 88 820.001.65 236 61 64135.0 140.0 14:55811.27 0.33 200 88 820.001.5 235 61 64140.0 145.0 15:00812.11 0.33 195 89 820.001.5 234 62 64145.0 150.0 15:05819.41 0.33 197 89 830.001.5 237 63 65150.0 155.0 15:10822.58 0.32 193 89 830.001.45 232 62 65155.0 160.0 15:15826.81 0.32 191 89 820.001.45 231 61 65160.0 165.0 15:20830.42 0.32 192 89 830.001.45 231 62 66165.0 170.0 15:25834.07 0.16 208 88 820.000.73 232 65 46170.0 175.0 15:30836.77 0.16 208 89 830.000.73 234 60 46175.0 180.0 15:35839.41 0.16 209 89 830.000.73 234 58 4180.0 15:40842.386Average:133.730.32 199.3 86.4 80.90.001.44 238 #DIV/0! 62.25 6Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.14Probe #T5-10-1PollutantHaxavalent ChromiumPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIntl. Insulation GroupDGM #T5-2Method0061Total Points129:15 12:2115.0/0.010 9.0/0.006LocationPhenix City, ALRate (cfm)0.736Run #2Time/pt (min)15.0SourceCupolaDelta ∆H@ Date10/28/10Time/reading5.0OperatorLUCKETTBws (%)4.6# of Ports2Total Run180.0Filter Number Condensate Volume109.7Cp0.805Ps (in Hg)29.93Barometric29.92Silica Gel Weight Gain26.2DGM Y1.011Pm (in Hg)30.03Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)0.2Actual Dn (in)0.293O2 (%)19.76Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)8.56An (ft^2)0.00047CO2 (%)1.12Md28.97Stack Area (sf)57.59Est.DH(in H2O)1.45Ms28.46Act. Flow (cfm)114,476Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 132.20Preliminary dP (in H20)0.32Total Vol.(cf)132.5Wet Ref Flow (cfm)93,777Moisture % 4.62Preliminary Ts (oF)189Est. Us (ft/s)34.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)89,461Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.3158Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 9:15843.144 0.36 182 71 670.001.65 225 72 415.0 10.0 9:20847.01 0.36 181 71 690.001.65 228 68 5110.0 15.0 9:25850.8 0.36 183 74 700.001.65 230 62 5215.0 20.0 9:30854.82 0.34 188 76 710.001.55 229 60 5220.0 25.0 9:35856.64 0.31 189 77 720.001.4 225 55 5225.0 30.0 9:40862.42 0.31 187 77 700.001.4 228 57 5330.0 35.0 9:45866.19 0.33 188 79 740.001.5 230 57 5335.0 40.0 9:50869.95 0.36 184 76 730.001.65 231 56 5340.0 45.0 9:55873.6 0.35 186 79 720.001.6 233 57 5445.0 50.0 10:00877.78 0.34 182 82 740.001.55 238 56 5450.0 55.0 10:05881.49 0.35 180 80 750.001.6 239 56 5455.0 60.0 10:10885.66 0.33 183 78 740.001.5 240 56 5560.0 65.0 10:15889.53 0.31 186 81 740.001.4 238 56 5565.0 70.0 10:20893.43 0.31 185 82 750.001.4 240 58 5570.0 75.0 10:25897.17 0.31 185 83 760.001.4 237 56 5675.0 80.0 10:30900.90 0.22 179 81 770.001 233 57 5680.0 85.0 10:35904.01 0.20 177 86 750.000.91 236 58 4685.0 90.0 10:40907.00 0.20 180 86 760.000.91 230 57 4190.0 95.0 10:51909.968 0.25 189 78 750.001.15 236 65 5195.0 100.0 10:56913.32 0.26 191 78 760.001.2 233 59 51100.0 105.0 11:01916.90 0.27 195 78 760.001.2 238 58 52105.0 110.0 11:06920.40 0.31 198 81 770.001.4 237 57 52110.0 115.0 11:11924.29 0.31 194 84 760.001.4 231 59 52115.0 120.0 11:16927.8 0.31 190 82 750.001.4 229 56 53120.0 125.0 11:21931.55 0.32 189 86 760.001.45 232 58 53125.0 130.0 11:26935.31 0.32 187 85 750.001.45 237 57 53130.0 135.0 11:31939.06 0.33 185 85 760.001.5 233 55 54135.0 140.0 11:36943.01 0.35 182 85 760.001.6 230 56 54140.0 145.0 11:41946.66 0.35 180 83 770.001.6 235 52 54145.0 150.0 11:46950.56 0.36 183 84 750.001.65 230 55 55150.0 155.0 11:51954.5 0.32 185 81 770.001.45 236 55 55155.0 160.0 11:56958.31 0.32 188 85 780.001.45 231 50 55160.0 165.0 12:01961.99 0.33 185 84 770.001.5 230 55 56165.0 170.0 12:06966 0.25 178 85 780.001.15 231 57 56170.0 175.0 12:11969.3 0.24 176 85 770.001.1 236 55 56175.0 180.0 12:16972.81 0.24 175 86 780.001.1 234 52 5180.0 12:21976.268Average:133.120.31 184.9 80.9 74.70.001.40 233.0 #DIV/0! 57.4 5Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.14Probe #T5-10-1PollutantHaxavalent ChromiumPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIntl. Insulation GroupDGM #T5-2Method0061Total Points1212:40 15:4515.0/0.003 8.0/0.001LocationPhenix City, ALRate (cfm)0.727Run #3Time/pt (min)15.0SourceCupolaDelta ∆H@ Date10/28/10Time/reading5.0OperatorLUCKETTBws (%)4.6# of Ports2Total Run180.0Filter Number Condensate Volume107.3Cp0.805Ps (in Hg)29.95Barometric29.94Silica Gel Weight Gain25.9DGM Y1.011Pm (in Hg)30.05Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)0.2Actual Dn (in)0.293O2 (%)19.76Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)8.56An (ft^2)0.00047CO2 (%)1.13Md28.97Stack Area (sf)57.59Est.DH(in H2O)1.45Ms28.47Act. Flow (cfm)112,633Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 130.16Preliminary dP (in H20)0.32Total Vol.(cf)130.9Wet Ref Flow (cfm)92,408Moisture % 4.60Preliminary Ts (oF)189Est. Us (ft/s)34.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)88,173Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.3159Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 12:40976.618 0.28 185 77 760.001.25 225 73 415.0 10.0 12:45980.55 0.28 188 78 750.001.25 228 57 4110.0 15.0 12:50984.1 0.27 187 78 760.001.2 231 55 4215.0 20.0 12:55987.13 0.32 191 82 780.001.45 233 55 4220.0 25.0 13:00990.84 0.33 190 85 760.001.5 231 54 4225.0 30.0 13:05994.62 0.33 193 83 760.001.5 236 53 4330.0 35.0 13:10998.44 0.35 190 83 760.001.6 233 54 4335.0 40.0 13:151002.41 0.34 188 85 770.001.55 230 54 4340.0 45.0 13:201006.28 0.35 191 84 750.001.6 236 55 4445.0 50.0 13:251010.27 0.36 187 86 770.001.65 230 55 4450.0 55.0 13:301014.18 0.35 184 85 770.001.6 236 56 4455.0 60.0 13:351018.23 0.35 182 86 780.001.6 233 57 4560.0 65.0 13:401022.05 0.34 180 84 780.001.55 240 57 4565.0 70.0 13:451025.88 0.32 178 84 780.001.45 237 56 4570.0 75.0 13:501029.81 0.33 177 85 760.001.5 231 57 4675.0 80.0 13:551033.70 0.22 173 84 780.001 232 57 4680.0 85.0 14:001036.86 0.22 175 85 770.001 231 57 4685.0 90.0 14:051039.99 0.22 172 85 770.001 233 57 4190.0 95.0 14:151043.371 0.28 185 82 790.001.25 230 64 4195.0 100.0 14:201046.82 0.28 184 82 770.001.25 228 59 41100.0 105.0 14:251050.37 0.29 189 81 780.001.3 229 57 42105.0 110.0 14:301053.66 0.32 181 86 770.001.45 236 58 42110.0 115.0 14:351057.69 0.20 178 88 780.000.91 233 59 32115.0 120.0 14:401060.59 0.29 179 88 790.001.3 228 60 43120.0 125.0 14:451064.24 0.30 183 85 780.001.35 230 60 43125.0 130.0 14:501067.92 0.37 187 85 790.001.65 230 60 43130.0 135.0 14:551072.16 0.37 184 87 800.001.65 239 60 44135.0 140.0 15:001076.3 0.33 186 87 820.001.5 230 61 44140.0 145.0 15:051079.55 0.32 188 86 800.001.45 228 61 54145.0 150.0 15:101083.7 0.32 187 85 790.001.45 229 62 55150.0 155.0 15:151087.56 0.29 189 89 780.001.3 225 61 55155.0 160.0 15:201091.45 0.29 192 89 790.001.3 228 61 55160.0 165.0 15:251095.4 0.29 190 85 800.001.3 231 62 56165.0 170.0 15:301099.04 0.22 182 87 830.001 230 62 46170.0 175.0 15:351102.83 0.22 180 88 840.001 228 62 46175.0 180.0 15:401105.71 0.22 180 89 850.001 230 63 4180.0 15:451108.487Average:131.870.30 184.3 84.7 78.20.001.35 231.3 #DIV/0! 58.6388889 4.1Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # T5-10-1 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post
Company Intl. Insulation Group DGM # T5-1 Method M26A Total Points 12 17 0.003

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.699 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 5.0 10 0.001

Source Cupola (stack 101) Delta ∆H@ Date 10/26/10 Time/reading 5.0 Operator Luckett Bws (%) 4.60 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 31.9 Cp 0.805 Ps (in Hg) 29.48

Barometric 29.46 Silica Gel Weight Gain 11 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.46 Ref Temp 68 Static (in H2O) 0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.28 O2 (%) 19.80 Ref Press 29.92
Stack Dia (ft) 8.563 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 0.90 Md 28.94 Stack Area (sf) 57.59
Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.43 Act. Flow (cfm) 116,224 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 41.82 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 41.9 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 94,889

Moisture % 4.61 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 90,528
Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: " Data Entry Cells "

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch "

PT # Start Time End Time Clock Time (24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out Desired Delta

H Actual

Delta H Probe Temp.

(*F) Filter Temp

(*F) Imp temp.

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 5.0 18:01 66.416 0.28 179 89 90 0.00 1.1 256 250 69 5

2 5.0 10.0 18:06 69.90 0.32 181 90 90 0.00 1.25 250 248 66 5

3 10.0 15.0 18:11 73.32 0.36 175 93 88 0.00 1.4 265 256 62 6

4 15.0 20.0 18:16 77.18 0.36 178 95 88 0.00 1.4 267 260 62 6

5 20.0 25.0 18:21 80.98 0.32 175 96 87 0.00 1.25 265 261 62 6

6 25.0 30.0 18:26 83.50 0.31 182 98 86 0.00 1.2 263 260 65 6

1 30.0 35.0 18:38 88.528 0.22 178 93 89 0.00 0.85 266 263 73 4

2 35.0 40.0 18:43 91.75 0.31 190 93 88 0.00 1.2 257 255 68 5

3 40.0 45.0 18:48 95.33 0.36 165 96 88 0.00 1.4 252 256 66 6

4 45.0 50.0 18:53 99.18 0.36 161 97 87 0.00 1.4 261 253 65 6

5 50.0 55.0 18:58 102.39 0.32 174 99 88 0.00 1.25 262 257 63 6

6 55.0 60.0 19:03 106.80 0.27 189 100 87 0.00 1.05 263 260 66 5

60.0 19:08 110.177

Average: 43.76 0.32 177.3 94.9 88.0 0.00 1.23 261 257 65.5833333 6 Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # T5-10-1 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post
Company Intl. Insulation Group DGM # T5-1 Method M26A Total Points 12 14:45 15:48 14.0/0.000 12.0/0.000

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.699 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 5.0

Source Cupola (stack 101) Delta ∆H@ Date 10/27/10 Time/reading 5.0 Operator LUCKETT Bws (%) 5.3 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 43.5 Cp 0.805 Ps (in Hg) 29.74

Barometric 29.73 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.73 Ref Temp 68 Static (in H2O) 0.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.280 O2 (%) 19.84 Ref Press 29.92
Stack Dia (ft) 8.56 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 1.01 Md 28.96 Stack Area (sf) 57.59
Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.37 Act. Flow (cfm) 120,510 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 43.67 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 41.9 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 95,170

Moisture % 5.36 Preliminary Ts (oF) 202 Est. Us (ft/s) 34.5 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 90,087
Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3179 Comments: " Data Entry Cells "

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch "

PT # Start Time End Time Clock Time (24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out Desired Delta

H Actual

Delta H Probe Temp.

(*F) Filter Temp

(*F) Imp temp.

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 5.0 12:30 251.746 0.30 202 87 88 0.00 1.25 267 242 67 6

2 5.0 10.0 12:35 254.98 0.32 202 87 88 0.00 1.35 265 245 65 6

3 10.0 15.0 12:40 258.28 0.32 205 88 88 0.00 1.35 261 247 61 6

4 15.0 20.0 12:45 262.61 0.36 207 90 88 0.00 1.5 262 249 58 6

5 20.0 25.0 12:50 266.71 0.34 213 92 88 0.00 1.4 260 252 57 6

6 25.0 30.0 12:55 270.86 0.34 211 93 88 0.00 1.4 258 253 57 6

1 30.0 35.0 14:10 275.285 0.30 213 84 84 0.00 1.25 244 241 64 6

2 35.0 40.0 14:15 278.72 0.28 212 86 83 0.00 1.15 243 239 57 6

3 40.0 45.0 14:20 282.17 0.38 206 90 82 0.00 1.6 246 246 57 6

4 45.0 50.0 14:25 286.16 0.35 200 91 83 0.00 1.45 247 250 56 6

5 50.0 55.0 14:30 289.95 0.33 189 92 83 0.00 1.4 244 251 58 6

6 55.0 60.0 14:35 293.73 0.30 196 92 83 0.00 1.25 242 249 59 6

60.0 14:40 296.705

Average: 44.96 0.33 204.7 89.3 85.5 0.00 1.36 253.3 247.0 59.7 6 Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # T5-10-1 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post
Company Intl. Insulation Group DGM # T5-1 Method M26A Total Points 12 14:45 15:48 14.0/0.000 12.0/0.000

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.699 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 5.0

Source Cupola (stack 101) Delta ∆H@ Date 10/27/10 Time/reading 5.0 Operator LUCKETT Bws (%) 5.1 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 39.4 Cp 0.805 Ps (in Hg) 29.67

Barometric 29.66 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9.1 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.66 Ref Temp 68 Static (in H2O) 0.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.28 O2 (%) 19.84 Ref Press 29.92
Stack Dia (ft) 8.56 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 1.01 Md 28.96 Stack Area (sf) 57.59
Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.40 Act. Flow (cfm) 120,538 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 42.62 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 41.9 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 94,743

Moisture % 5.08 Preliminary Ts (oF) 202 Est. Us (ft/s) 34.5 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 89,939
Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3173 Comments: " Data Entry Cells "

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch "

PT # Start Time End Time Clock Time (24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out Desired Delta

H Actual

Delta H Probe Temp.

(*F) Filter Temp

(*F) Imp temp.

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 5.0 14:45 297.162 0.28 202 93 85 0.00 1.15 241 244 69 6

2 5.0 10.0 14:50 300.52 0.30 209 95 85 0.00 1.25 245 241 64 6

3 10.0 15.0 14:55 303.96 0.35 211 96 85 0.00 1.45 248 242 62 6

4 15.0 20.0 15:00 307.83 0.38 210 99 86 0.00 1.6 252 247 59 6

5 20.0 25.0 15:05 311.70 0.38 207 100 86 0.00 1.6 249 244 57 6

6 25.0 30.0 15:10 315.65 0.36 212 100 86 0.00 1.5 248 245 57 6

1 30.0 35.0 15:18 319.735 0.23 204 97 87 0.00 0.92 243 238 61 6

2 35.0 40.0 15:23 322.81 0.28 197 97 87 0.00 1.15 242 240 58 6

3 40.0 45.0 15:28 325.08 0.33 203 99 87 0.00 1.4 243 240 55 6

4 45.0 50.0 15:33 330.07 0.38 205 99 87 0.00 1.6 244 251 57 6

5 50.0 55.0 15:38 334.10 0.35 210 100 87 0.00 1.45 249 256 57 6

6 55.0 60.0 15:43 337.98 0.30 205 100 87 0.00 1.25 249 259 58 6

60.0 15:48 341.518

Average: 44.36 0.33 206.3 97.9 86.3 0.00 1.36 246.1 245.6 59.5 6.0 Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.14Probe #T5-3-2PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port8Start Finish Pre PostCompanyInt. Insulation GroupDGM #50-2Method316Total Points169:01 10:1415.0/0.000 10.0/0.000LocationPhenix City, ALRate (cfm)0.707Run #1Time/pt (min)4.0SourceCuring OvenDelta ∆H@ Date26-Oct-10Time/reading4.0OperatorLEEBws (%)4.91# of Ports2Total Run64.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume32.7Cp0.804Ps (in Hg)29.66Barometric29.61Silica Gel Weight Gain16.6DGM Y0.993Pm (in Hg)29.61Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)0.7Actual Dn (in)0.308O2 (%)18.2Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)2.17An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)1.1Md28.90Stack Area (sf)3.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.37Act. Flow (cfm)10,632Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 44.90Preliminary dP (in H20)0.44Total Vol.(cf)45.2Wet Ref Flow (cfm)5,496Moisture % 4.91Preliminary Ts (oF)550Est. Us (ft/s)50.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)5,226Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.3255Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 9:01914.875 0.40 557 88 860.001.15 226 252 74 524.0 8.0 9:05917.62 0.38 555 91 840.001.15 244 261 67 538.0 12.0 9:09920.69 0.38 553 98 860.001.2 247 267 65 5412.0 16.0 9:13923.81 0.38 554 100 860.001.2 256 268 65 5516.0 20.0 9:17926.96 0.43 552 104 870.001.35 257 269 65 5.5620.0 24.0 9:21929.91 0.41 549 109 890.001.3 255 269 64 5.5724.0 28.0 9:25933.17 0.48 544 110 890.001.5 251 268 64 5.5828.0 32.0 9:29936.72 0.50 550 112 910.001.6 252 270 64 5.5132.0 36.0 9:42939.123 0.28 549 100 930.000.89 249 262 66 5236.0 40.0 9:46942.07 0.33 551 106 930.001.05 252 263 65 5340.0 44.0 9:50945.53 0.38 555 110 940.001.2 256 263 63 5444.0 48.0 9:54948.61 0.38 552 112 940.001.2 257 260 63 5548.0 52.0 9:58951.45 0.43 553 113 940.001.35 261 261 64 5652.0 56.0 10:02954.66 0.45 558 115 950.001.4 264 258 64 5756.0 60.0 10:06958.01 0.44 556 118 950.001.4 263 260 65 5860.0 64.0 10:10960.82 0.44 553 118 950.001.4 267 259 65 564.0 10:14963.130Average:48.260.41 552.6 106.5 90.70.001.27 254 263 65.1875 5Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.14Probe #T5-3-2PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port8Start Finish Pre PostCompanyInt. Insulation GroupDGM #50-2Method316Total Points1611:07 12:1715.0/0.000 12.0/0.000LocationPhenix City, ALRate (cfm)0.715Run #2Time/pt (min)4.0SourceCuring OvenDelta ∆H@ Date26-Oct-10Time/reading4.0OperatorLEEBws (%)5.2# of Ports2Total Run64.0Filter Number Condensate Volume42.1Cp0.804Ps (in Hg)29.60Barometric29.55Silica Gel Weight Gain10.7DGM Y0.993Pm (in Hg)29.55Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)0.7Actual Dn (in)0.308O2 (%)18.2Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)2.17An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)0.90Md28.87Stack Area (sf)3.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.31Act. Flow (cfm)10,425Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd #REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)45.8Wet Ref Flow (cfm)5,368Moisture % #REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)5,089Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 11:07963.570 0.27 552 95 950.000.86 234 245 72 524.0 8.0 11:11966.58 0.34 550 98 940.001.05 245 251 67 538.0 12.0 11:15969.63 0.34 557 100 950.001.05 247 260 65 5412.0 16.0 11:19972.71 0.34 553 103 950.001.05 251 264 64 5516.0 20.0 11:23975.83 0.39 557 105 960.001.25 250 267 64 5620.0 24.0 11:27978.91 0.40 559 108 970.001.25 256 266 61 5724.0 28.0 11:31982.60 0.43 554 111 970.001.35 254 267 59 5.5828.0 32.0 11:35985.94 0.61 547 115 980.001.95 253 269 59 6.5132.0 36.0 11:45989.150 0.37 555 110 990.001.15 248 263 60 5236.0 40.0 11:49992.48 0.38 554 113 990.001.2 247 261 58 5340.0 44.0 11:53995.80 0.40 554 115 990.001.25 250 261 58 5.5444.0 48.0 11:57998.74 0.39 557 116 1000.001.25 252 264 59 5.5548.0 52.0 12:011001.90 0.39 558 117 1000.001.25 253 264 59 5.5652.0 56.0 12:051005.11 0.42 557 117 1000.001.35 249 268 60 5.5756.0 60.0 12:091008.07 0.42 556 118 1000.001.35 248 269 60 5.5860.0 64.0 12:131010.89 0.33 552 118 1000.001.05 246 269 60 564.0 12:171012.872Average:49.300.39 554.5 109.9 97.80.001.23 249 263 61.5625 5Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.14Probe #54-5-4PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port8Start Finish Pre PostCompanyInt. Insulation GroupDGM #T4-3Method316Total Points1613:55 15:0715.0/0.000 13.0/0.000LocationPhenix City, ALRate (cfm)0.726Run #3Time/pt (min)4.0SourceCuring OvenDelta ∆H@ Date26-Oct-10Time/reading4.0OperatorLEEBws (%)5.2# of Ports2Total Run64.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume41Cp0.804Ps (in Hg)29.57Barometric29.52Silica Gel Weight Gain12.8DGM Y0.993Pm (in Hg)29.52Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)0.7Actual Dn (in)0.308O2 (%)18.2Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)2.17An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)1.1Md28.90Stack Area (sf)3.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.34Act. Flow (cfm)10,268Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd #REF!Preliminary dP (in H20)0.44Total Vol.(cf)46.5Wet Ref Flow (cfm)5,230Moisture % #REF!Preliminary Ts (oF)550Est. Us (ft/s)50.1Dry Ref Flow (cfm)4,957Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.3256Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 13:5514.050 0.38 580 97 960.001.2 237 242 69 5.524.0 8.0 13:5917.27 0.34 574 99 960.001.05 240 249 64 5.538.0 12.0 14:0320.32 0.34 571 99 970.001.05 244 251 60 5.5412.0 16.0 14:0723.51 0.36 569 103 990.001.15 241 248 59 5.5516.0 20.0 14:1126.49 0.34 568 109 990.001.05 249 252 59 5.5620.0 24.0 14:1529.57 0.32 567 111 990.001 248 255 60 5724.0 28.0 14:1932.87 0.38 565 114 990.001.2 246 256 60 5.5828.0 32.0 14:2335.92 0.41 564 115 990.001.3 247 260 61 5.5132.0 36.0 14:3538.475 0.31 559 112 1010.000.98 250 258 66 5.5236.0 40.0 14:3941.67 0.28 556 115 1010.000.89 249 260 64 5340.0 44.0 14:4344.30 0.35 559 117 1010.001.1 249 261 60 5.5444.0 48.0 14:4747.72 0.35 558 117 1010.001.1 250 259 60 5.5548.0 52.0 14:5150.93 0.38 559 118 1020.001.2 253 256 61 5.5652.0 56.0 14:5554.20 0.40 562 118 1020.001.25 252 254 61 5.5756.0 60.0 14:5957.49 0.49 562 119 1030.001.55 252 250 62 5.5860.0 64.0 15:0360.70 0.54 561 119 1030.001.7 253 249 62 5.564.0 15:0764.358Average:50.310.37 564.6 111.4 99.90.001.17 248 254 61.75 5Leak Check

# APPENDIX D

EQUIPMENT

CALIBRATION

DOCUMENTS

# APPENDIX E

LABORATORY

ANALYTICAL REPORTS

### Date Source Method Run Start

Time End

Time **O 2**  

### CO **2**



### 10/26/10 Curing Oven 316 1 9:01 10:14 **18.2 1.1 10/26/10 Cupola 5/29 1 10:10 13:27**  **19.78 0.96 10/26/10 Cupola OTM27/28 1 10:10 13:29**  **19.78 0.96 10/26/10 Curing Oven 316 2 11:07 12:17**  **18.2 0.9 10/26/10 Curing Oven 316 3 13:55 15:07**  **18.2 1.1 10/26/10 Cupola 5/29 2 14:15 17:36**  **19.73 0.87 10/26/10 Cupola OTM27/28 2 14:15 17:37**  **19.73 0.87**

**10/26/10 Cupola**  **26A 1**  **18:01 19:08**  **19.80 0.90 10/27/10 Cupola 5/29 3 8:37 11:56**  **19.62 1.01 10/27/10 Cupola OTM27/28 3 8:37 11:52**  **19.62 1.01 10/27/10 Cupola 0061 1 12:30 15:40**  **19.84 1.01 10/27/10 Cupola 26A 2 12:30 14:40**  **19.84 1.01**

**10/27/10 Cupola**  **26A 3**  **14:45 15:48**  **19.84 1.01 10/28/10 Cupola 0061 2 9:15 12:21**  **19.76 1.12 10/28/10 Cupola 30B 1 9:15 11:15**  **19.76 1.12 10/28/10 Cupola 30B 2 11:35 13:35**  **19.76 1.13 10/28/10 Cupola 0061 3 12:40 15:45**  **19.76 1.13**

**10/28/10 Cupola**  **30B 3**  **13:50 15:50**  **19.76 1.13 BTEC Job # 10-3990.14**  **IIG, Phenix City, Alabama**AcetoneRinseVolume(mL)ParticulateWeight inAcetone(mg)ParticulateWeight onFilter(mg)Inorganic(mg)Organic(mg)FilterablePM2.5 CatchWeight (mg)OrganicPM2.5 CatchWeight (mg)InorganicPM2.5 CatchWeight (mg)Run 112015.617.8411.733.401.041Run 21208.915.8493.524.701.549Run 3400.942.90511.743.801.051Blank:110.00NDND2.3NDRDL:0.50.300.501.00OTM 27/28 PM2.5Lab Results Blank CorrectionIndustrial Insulation Group, LLCPhoenix City, AL - CupolaBTEC job # 10-3990.14CorrectedSampling Dates: October 26-28, 2010OTM27OTM28AcetoneRinseVolume(mL)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)ParticulateWeight onFilter (mg)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)CombinedParticulateWeight (mg)Blank210 ND NDRun 1120 5.1 34.0 5.139.1Run 2110 1.7 21.0 1.722.7Run 31001.648.11.649.7RDL0.5 0.30Method 5 PM Lab Results Blank CorrectionCorrectedSampling Dates: October 26-28, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.14Phoenix City, AL - CupolaIndustrial Insulation Group, LLCCompound/FractionBlankFilterResult(μg)FilterRDL(μg)R1Result(μg)R2Result(μg)R3Result(μg)Test RunDetectionLimit (RDL)(μg)R1(μg)R2(μg)R3(μg)MDLusedAntimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.800.8 0.8 0.8<Arsenic 0.60 0.40 1.21 1.10 1.39 0.800.8 0.8 0.8<Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.200.20 0.20 0.20<Cadmium ND 0.10 1.39 6.01 0.26 0.201.39 6.01 0.26Chromium 1.75 0.30 6.26 5.24 3.47 0.604.5 3.5 1.7Cobalt ND 0.10 2.76 3.61 0.76 0.202.76 3.61 0.76Lead 1.52 0.20 7.98 21.9 3.0 0.406.5 20.4 1.5Manganese 1.02 0.75 4.6 5.9 2.4 1.53.6 4.9 1.5<Nickel 0.78 0.50 6.2 8.7 5.6 1.05.4 7.9 4.8Selenium ND 1.0 15.5 15.0 21.9 2.015.5 15.0 21.9Industrial Insulation Group, LLCMethod 29 Lab Results Blank CorrectionCorrectedSampling Dates: October 26-28, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.14Phoenix City, AL - CupolaCorrectedTotal Volume(ml)ImpingerKOH (ml)HexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg] RDLHexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg]MDLusedRun 17603002.0 0.41.5Run 28103000.8 0.40.4<Run 37503000.60.40.4<Blank H2O520 ND 0.30Blank KOH440 0.70 0.20Method 0061 Lab Results Blank CorrectionSampling Dates: October 26-28, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.14Phoenix City, AL - CupolaIndustrial Insulation Group, LLCVolume (mL)HydrochloricAcid (μg)HydrofluoricAcid (μg)HydrochloricAcid (μg)HydrofluoricAcid (μg)Run 1340230380230380Run 2280NDND200200Run 3410NDND200200Blank H20190NDNDBlank H2SO4200 ND NDRDL200200CorrectedMethod 26A Lab Results Blank CorrectionIndustrial Insulation Group, LLCPhoenix City, AL - CupolaBTEC job # 10-3990.14Sampling Dates: October 26-28, 2010Volume[ml]Formaldehyde[μg]Methanol[μg]RDLPhenol[μg]RDLFormaldehyde[μg]Methanol[μg]Phenol[μg]Blank UFDI 160 ND ND NDRun 1 470 19800 70 23819800 70 238Run 2 490 19000 29 12919000 29 129Run 344020000351362000035136621FormingMethod 316 Lab Results Blank CorrectionCorrectedOctober 26, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.14Phoenix City, AL - Curing OvenIndustrial Insulation Group, LLC

### Your Project #: 10-3990.14

Your C.O.C. #: 0698

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.
Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/18



## CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F8917

Received: 2010/11/05, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 8

Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) (

2 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/12 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) ( 2 ) 4 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/16 Weight of DCM Received 4 N/A 2010/11/12 Weight of Water

from Impingers 4 N/A 2010/11/12

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This is a non-accredited test. (2) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover

pages: 1

Page 1 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8917 Client Project #: 10-3990.14 Report Date: 2010/11/18



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H T 5 3 4 3 H

T 5 3 4 5 H

T 5 3 4 6 H

T 5 3 4 7 Sampling Date 2010/10/28 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/27

12:25 15:50 19:30 14:30

COC Number 0698 0698 0698 0698

U n i t s TRAIN R1-OTM28 R2-OTM28 R3-OTM28 RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM28

Weight g 300 370 320 250 0.1 2326676

DCM Weight g 210 240 140 170 0.1 2326673

Inorganic Condensible PM mg 2.3 41 49 51 0.50 2329514

Organic Condensible PM mg ND 1.7 3.5 1.7 1.0 2326671

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H T 5 3 5 0 H

T 5 3 5 1 H

T 5 3 5 2 H

T 5 3 5 3 Sampling Date 2010/10/28 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/27

12:25 15:50 19:30 14:30

COC Number

U n i t s TRAIN R1-OTM27 R2-OTM27 R3-OTM27 RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 15.6 8.9 0.9 0.5 2327097

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND 17.8 15.8 42.9 0.30 2324109

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 110 120 120 40 1 2327102

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8917 Client Project #: 10-3990.14 Report Date: 2010/11/18



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HT5343 Collected 2010/10/28 Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12 Weight of Water

from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HT5345 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID R1-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12 Weight of Water

from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HT5346 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID R2-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12 Weight of Water

from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HT5347 Collected 2010/10/27 Sample ID R3-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12 Weight of Water

from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HT5350 Collected 2010/10/28 Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324109 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327097 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327102 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Page 3 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8917 Client Project #: 10-3990.14 Report Date: 2010/11/18



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HT5351 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID R1-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324109 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327097 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327102 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Maxxam ID HT5352 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID R2-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324109 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327097 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327102 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Maxxam ID HT5353 Collected 2010/10/27 Sample ID R3-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324109 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327097 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327102 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Page 4 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8917 Client Project #: 10-3990.14 Report Date: 2010/11/18

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample HT5343-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HT5345-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HT5346-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HT5347-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish residue found in aluminum dish.

RESULTS OF

ANALYSES OF

STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027): Maxxam # Filter Condition

HT5350-01R Normal

HT5351-01R DE/LFT

HT5352-01R Normal

HT5353-01R LFT

Normal Filters received in normal condition

LFT Loose filter

material in the petri dish

DE Edges of the filter are frayed

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.14

P.O. #: Project name:



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F8917

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2326671 MGE Spiked Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 93 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank DUP Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 90 % 70 - 130

RPD Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 3.4 % 20

Method Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 ND, RDL=1.0 mg
2327097 NUA Method Blank < 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/11/17 ND, RDL=0.5 mg
2329514 MGE Method Blank Inorganic Condensible PM 2010/11/15 ND, RDL=0.50 mg

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement. Spiked Blank: A blank

matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 6 of 6

### Your Project #: 10-3990.14

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.
Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/19



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F8910

Received: 2010/11/05, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/11 2010/11/16 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) ( 1 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/12 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/15

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8910 Client Project #: 10-3990.14 Report Date: 2010/11/19



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H T 5 3 0 8 H

T 5 3 1 0 H

T 5 3 1 1 Sampling Date 2010/10/28 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

13:15 15:00 19:00

U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN 1-M5/29 RUN 2-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 5.1 1.7 0.5 2327092

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND 34.0 21.0 0.30 2324155

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 210 120 110 1 2327096

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H T 5 3 1 2 Sampling Date 2010/10/27

13:00

U n i t s RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 1.6 0.5 2327092

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg 48.1 0.30 2324155

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 100 1 2327096

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8910 Client Project #: 10-3990.14 Report Date: 2010/11/19



### ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H T 5 3 0 8 H

T 5 3 1 0 H

T 5 3 1 0 H

T 5 3 1 1 Sampling Date 2010/10/28 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

13:15 15:00 15:00 19:00

U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN 1-M5/29 RUN RUN 2-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 Lab-Dup

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 2332632

Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.60 0.40 1.21 1.22 1.10 0.80 2332632

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 2332632

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug ND 0.10 1.39 1.46 6.01 0.20 2332632

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 1.75 0.30 6.26 6.32 5.24 0.60 2332632

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 2.76 2.81 3.61 0.20 2332632

Total Lead (Pb) ug 1.52 0.20 7.98 8.08 21.9 0.40 2332632

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 1.02 0.75 4.6 4.6 5.9 1.5 2332632

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 0.78 0.50 6.2 6.4 8.7 1.0 2332632

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 15.5 16.2 15.0 2.0 2332632

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H T 5 3 1 2 Sampling Date 2010/10/27

13:00

U n i t s RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.80 2332632

Total Arsenic (As) ug 1.39 0.80 2332632

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.20 2332632

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 0.26 0.20 2332632

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 3.47 0.60 2332632

Total Cobalt (Co) ug 0.76 0.20 2332632

Total Lead (Pb) ug 3.04 0.40 2332632

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 2.4 1.5 2332632

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 5.6 1.0 2332632

Total Selenium (Se) ug 21.9 2.0 2332632

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8910 Client Project #: 10-3990.14 Report Date: 2010/11/19



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HT5308 Collected 2010/10/28 Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2332632 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327092 2010/11/11 2010/11/16 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2324155 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327096 N/A 2010/11/15 NUA

Maxxam ID HT5310 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2332632 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327092 2010/11/11 2010/11/16 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2324155 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327096 N/A 2010/11/15 NUA

Maxxam ID HT5310 D u p Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2332632 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 N_R

Maxxam ID HT5311 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2332632 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327092 2010/11/11 2010/11/16 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2324155 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327096 N/A 2010/11/15 NUA

Maxxam ID HT5312 Collected 2010/10/27 Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2332632 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327092 2010/11/11 2010/11/16 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2324155 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327096 N/A 2010/11/15 NUA

Page 4 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8910 Client Project #: 10-3990.14 Report Date: 2010/11/19

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Maxxam # Filter Condition

HT5308-01R Normal

HT5310-01R Normal

HT5311-01R Normal

HT5312-01R DE/LFT

Normal Filters received in normal condition

LFT Loose filter material in the petri dish

DE Edges of the filter are frayed

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 2x dilution was required for all samples except HT5308 due to the matrix.

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HT5310.

Trace level As was observed in the Processed Blank.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.14

P.O. #: Project name:



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F8910

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2327092 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/11/16 ND, RDL=0.5 mg
2332632 N_R Matrix Spike

(HT5310) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP (HT5310) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 99 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike (HT5310) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 92 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP (HT5310) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 94 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 2.2 % 20

Matrix Spike (HT5310) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 90 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP (HT5310) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 91 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 1.1 % 20

Matrix Spike (HT5310) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP (HT5310) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike (HT5310) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 97 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP (HT5310) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 4.0 % 20

Matrix Spike (HT5310) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP (HT5310) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 98 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike (HT5310) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 97 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP (HT5310) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 100 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike (HT5310) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP (HT5310) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike (HT5310) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP (HT5310) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 99 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 3.1 % 20

Matrix Spike (HT5310) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 90 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP (HT5310) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 92 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 2.2 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 100 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 103 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 3.0 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 99 % 85 - 115

Page 6 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.14

P.O. #: Project name:



### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F8910

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2332632 N_R Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 0.6 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 96 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 98 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 1.5 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 99 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 101 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 2.3 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 102 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 102 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 0.4 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 101 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 101 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 0.1 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 101 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 104 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 2.8 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 102 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 102 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 0.01 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 102 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 101 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 1.5 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 99 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 99 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 0.1 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.40 ug Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.40 ug
RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 0.48, RDL=0.40 ug Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 0.50, RDL=0.40 ug
RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.10 ug Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.10 ug
RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.10 ug Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.10 ug
RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.30 ug Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.30 ug
RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.10 ug Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.10 ug
RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.20 ug Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.20 ug
RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.75 ug Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.75 ug
RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.50 ug Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.50 ug
RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=1.0 ug Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Page 7 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.14

P.O. #: Project name:



### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F8910

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2332632 N_R RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

RPD - Sample/Sample Dup Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 5.5 % 20

Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 1 % 20

Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 1.7 % 20

Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 1.2 % 20

Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 3.8 % 20

Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 4.1 % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation.

Page 8 of 8

### Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.
9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3 Twinsburg, OH 44087 Phone: (330) 405-0837 Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other



## Client Name 

# BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental112210 Report



## Date

Contact Name Phone

**Trap I.D. Test Location**  **Date Analyzed Scientist**  **Mass ng**

**Sect.1 Mass ng** 

**Sect.2 Spike** 

**Level Date(s) in** 

**Stack Comments** 

80332 Phenix City 11/9/2010 Andrew Mertz 0.63 0.44 10/28/2010 Run 1, Trap A

80282 Phenix City 11/9/2010 Andrew Mertz 20.1 0.37 20 10/28/2010 Run 1, Trap B

80290 Phenix City 11/9/2010 Andrew Mertz 1.47 0.48 10/28/2010 Run 2, Trap A

80308 Phenix City 11/9/2010 Andrew Mertz 21.1 0.53 20 10/28/2010 Run 2, Trap B

80309 Phenix City 11/9/2010 Andrew Mertz 0.58 0.44 10/28/2010 Run 3, Trap A

80289 Phenix City 11/9/2010 Andrew Mertz 19.1 0.28 20 10/28/2010 Run 3, Trap B

Variability +- 10% Calibration Report Available Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .031 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less

than the lowest detection limit. 

## Plant/Source 

# IIG Cupola 

# Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

11/22/2010

(248)-548-8072 Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew Smith

msmith@btecinc.com

### Your Project #: 10-3990.14

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.
Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/18



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F8885

Received: 2010/11/05, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. ( 1 ) 5 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/17

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8885 Client Project #: 10-3990.14 Report Date: 2010/11/18



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H T 5 1 7 1 H

T 5 1 7 2 H

T 5 1 7 3 H

T 5 1 7 3 H

T 5 1 7 4 Sampling Date 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

13:35 13:35 19:45 19:45 15:15

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-.1N RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

H2SO4-M26A 1-H2SO4-M26A 1-H2SO4-M26A 2-H2SO4-M26A Lab-Dup

Volume ml 190 200 340 280 1 2332604

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND 230 250 ND 200 2333119

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 380 380 ND 200 2333119

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H T 5 1 7 5 Sampling Date 2010/10/26

16:20

COC Number N/A

U n i t s RUN RDL QC Batch

3-H2SO4-M26A

Volume ml 410 1 2332604

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND 200 2333119

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND 200 2333119

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8885 Client Project #: 10-3990.14 Report Date: 2010/11/18



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HT5171 Collected 2010/10/28 Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2333119 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2332604 N/A 2010/11/17 A_S

Maxxam ID HT5172 Collected 2010/10/28 Sample ID BLANK-.1N H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2333119 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2332604 N/A 2010/11/17 A_S

Maxxam ID HT5173 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2333119 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2332604 N/A 2010/11/17 A_S

Maxxam ID HT5173 D u p Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2333119 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 A_S

Maxxam ID HT5174 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID RUN 2-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2333119 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2332604 N/A 2010/11/17 A_S

Maxxam ID HT5175 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID RUN 3-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2333119 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2332604 N/A 2010/11/17 A_S

Page 3 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8885 Client Project #: 10-3990.14 Report Date: 2010/11/18

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.14

P.O. #: Project name:



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F8885

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2333119 A_S Matrix Spike

(HT5173) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/17 95 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/17 97 % 80 - 120 Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/17 96 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/17 101 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/17 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/17 ND, RDL=200 ug
RPD - Sample/Sample Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/17 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/17 NC % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 5 of 5

### Your Project #: 10-3990.14

Site: CUPOLA

STACK

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.
Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/11



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F7162

Received: 2010/11/03, 12:00

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 4 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061)

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 1 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061)

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/05

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7162 Client Project #: 10-3990.14 Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: CUPOLA STACK



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H S 6 1 8 9 H S 6 1 9 0 H S 6 1 9 1 Sampling Date 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 2010/10/27

13:40 13:40 16:45

U n i t s R.BLANK-H2O-M0061 RDL R.BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL RUN 1-M0061 RDL QC Batch

Volume ml 520 1 440 1 760 1 2326127

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.3 0.7 0.2 2.0 0.4 2324993

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H S 6 1 9 1 H

S 6 1 9 6 H

S 6 1 9 7 Sampling Date 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 2010/10/28

16:45 13:30 16:40

U n i t s RUN 1-M0061 RUN 2-M0061 RUN 3-M0061 RDL QC Batch Lab-Dup

Volume ml 810 750 1 2326127

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 2.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 2324993

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7162 Client Project #: 10-3990.14 Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: CUPOLA STACK



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HS6189 Collected 2010/10/28 Sample ID R.BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2324993 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2326127 N/A 2010/11/05 FMO

Maxxam ID HS6190 Collected 2010/10/28 Sample ID R.BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2324993 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2326127 N/A 2010/11/05 FMO

Maxxam ID HS6191 Collected 2010/10/27 Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2324993 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2326127 N/A 2010/11/05 FMO

Maxxam ID HS6191 D u p Collected 2010/10/27 Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2324993 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Maxxam ID HS6196 Collected 2010/10/28 Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2324993 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2326127 N/A 2010/11/05 FMO

Maxxam ID HS6197 Collected 2010/10/28 Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2324993 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2326127 N/A 2010/11/05 FMO

Page 3 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7162 Client Project #: 10-3990.14 Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: CUPOLA STACK

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.14

P.O. #: Project name: CUPOLA STACK



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F7162

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2324993 LLE Matrix Spike

(HS6191) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 102 % 80 - 120 Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 94 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 ND, RDL=0.2 ug
RPD - Sample/Sample Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 1.9 % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 5 of 5

### Your Project #: 10-286-F

Site: CURING

OVEN

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.
Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/15



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F7089

Received: 2010/11/03, 12:00

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 11

Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Formaldehyde (M316) 6 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 BRL SOP-00113 EPA 316

Final Volume of Impinger 6 N/A 2010/11/10

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) ( 1 ) 5 N/A 2010/11/08 BRL SOP-00211 NCASI WP99.01mod

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) C



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7089 Client Project #: 10-286-F Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H S 5 9 1 2 H S 5 9 1 3 Sampling Date 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

13:37 13:35

U n i t s RB-CURINGOVEN-H2O-M316 RDL BT-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug ND 3.9 ND 7.2 2323959

Volume ml 160 1 290 1 2326326

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H S 5 9 1 4 H S 5 9 1 4 H S 5 9 1 6 Sampling Date 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

10:55 10:55 10:55

U n i t s R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-M316 R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-M316 RDL R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-M316 RDL QC Batch Lab-Dup

Formaldehyde ug 18000 18000 440 1800 30 2323959

Volume ml 350 1 120 1 2326326

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H S 5 9 1 7 H S 5 9 1 8 Sampling Date 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

13:00 16:05

U n i t s R2-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-M316 RDL R3-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 19000 240 20000 220 2323959

Volume ml 490 1 440 1 2326326

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7089 Client Project #: 10-286-F Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN



### MISCELLANEOUS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H S 5 9 0 4 H S 5 9 0 5 H S 5 9 0 5 Sampling Date 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

13:35 10:55 10:55

U n i t s BT-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-VOA R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-VOA R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-VOA RDL QC Batch Lab-Dup

Methanol ug ND 46 46 4 2325615

Phenol ug ND 106 113 6 2325615

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H S 5 9 0 6 H S 5 9 0 7 H S 5 9 0 8 Sampling Date 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

10:55 13:00 16:05

U n i t s R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-VOA R2-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-VOA R3-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-VOA RDL QC Batch

Methanol ug 24 29 35 4 2325615

Phenol ug 125 129 136 6 2325615

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7089 Client Project #: 10-286-F Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HS5904 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID BT-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2325615 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HS5905 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2325615 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HS5905 D u p Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2325615 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HS5906 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2325615 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HS5907 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID R2-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2325615 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HS5908 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID R3-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2325615 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HS5912 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID RB-CURINGOVEN-H2O-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2323959 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2326326 N/A 2010/11/10

Page 4 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7089 Client Project #: 10-286-F Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HS5913 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID BT-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2323959 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2326326 N/A 2010/11/10

Maxxam ID HS5914 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2323959 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2326326 N/A 2010/11/10

Maxxam ID HS5914 D u p Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2323959 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 LLE

Maxxam ID HS5916 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2323959 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2326326 N/A 2010/11/10

Maxxam ID HS5917 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID R2-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2323959 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2326326 N/A 2010/11/10

Maxxam ID HS5918 Collected 2010/10/26 Sample ID R3-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2323959 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2326326 N/A 2010/11/10

Page 5 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7089 Client Project #: 10-286-F Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample HS5904-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HS5905-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HS5906-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HS5907-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HS5908-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 6 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-286-F

P.O. #: Project name: CURING OVEN



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F7089

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2323959 LLE Matrix Spike

(HS5914) Formaldehyde 2010/11/09 100 % 80 - 120 Spiked Blank Formaldehyde 2010/11/09 100 % 91 - 107

Method Blank Formaldehyde 2010/11/09 ND, RDL=2.5 ug
RPD - Sample/Sample Dup Formaldehyde 2010/11/09 0.3 % 20

2325615 SPS Matrix Spike Methanol 2010/11/08 103 % N/A

Phenol 2010/11/08 114 % N/A Spiked Blank Methanol 2010/11/08 107 % N/A

Phenol 2010/11/08 108 % N/A

Method Blank Methanol 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=50 ug

Phenol 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=6 ug
RPD - Sample/Sample Dup Methanol 2010/11/08 0 % N/A

Phenol 2010/11/08 6.4 % 50

N/A = Not Applicable

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 7 of 7

# APPENDIX F

METHOD 318

ANALYTICAL REPORTSCompany Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source ID**Industrial Insulation Group Phoenix City Alabama Curing Oven** Measured Value(ppm)CorrectedConcentration(ppmvd at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used (EPAMethod 318)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test MethodComments**Run 1 10/26/2010 9:01 10/26/2010 10:14 88.89 NA wet Method 318 2.12E+00** **1.09E+02 4.9 1.1 18.2 10632.04 5496.16 5226.44 553 Stack Gas information** **from Method 316-run#1 Run 2 10/26/2010 11:07 10/26/2010 12:17 85.17 NA wet Method 318** **1.99E+00 1.05E+02 5.2 0.9 18.2 10424.99 5367.96 5089.45 555** **Stack Gas information from Method 316-run#2** **Run 3 10/26/2010 13:55 10/26/2010 15:07 81.60 NA wet Method 318 1.85E+00** **1.00E+02 5.2 18.2 1.1 10267.95 5229.55 4957.48 565 Stack Gas information** **from Method 316-run#3**Flue GasFlow Rate(scfm)Other SupportingInformationFlue GasFlow Rate(dscfm)Flue GasTemperature(oF)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)Flue GasMoisture (%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)Flue GasCO2(%)ProcessProductionRate(tons rock/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(mg/dscm)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)Test End TimeCarbon Monoxide Emission Test ResultsRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date**10-3990.14 - M318 summary.xls CO Emission Data-318** **1/28/2011**Company NamePlant Location CityPlant Location StateSource NameSource ID**Industrial Insulation Group Phenix City Alabama Curing Oven** Measured Value(ppm)CorrectedConcentration(ppmvd at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used (EPAMethod 318)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test Method Comments**Run 1 10/26/2010 9:01 10/26/2010 10:14 0.10 NA wet Method 318 5.12E-03** **2.62E-01 4.9 1.1 18.2 10632.04 5496.16 5226.44 553** **Stack Gas information from Method 316-run#1** **Run 2 10/26/2010 11:07 10/26/2010 12:17 0.10 NA wet Method 318 5.00E-03** **2.63E-01 5.2 0.9 18.2 10424.99 5367.96 5089.45 555** **Stack Gas information from Method 316-run#2** **Run 3 10/26/2010 13:55 10/26/2010 15:07 0.10 NA wet Method 318 4.87E-03** **2.63E-01 5.2 18.2 1.1 10267.95 5229.55 4957.48 565** **Stack Gas information from Method 316-run#3** CalculatedEmission Rate(mg/dscm)Flue GasFlow Rate(scfm)Other SupportingInformationCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)Flue GasMoisture (%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue GasFlow Rate(dscfm)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)Flue GasTemperature(oF)ProcessProductionRate(tons rock/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)Test End TimeCarbonyl Sulfide Emission Test ResultsRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date**10-3990.14 - M318 summary.xls COS Emission Data-318** **1/28/2011**