alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14**

**PROMULGATED UNDER**

**SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

I, Kenneth J. Witkin, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CBRE Realty Finance, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for the registrant and we have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and 

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC ReleaseNo. 33-8238; 34-47986, Section III E.] 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 14, 2007
EXHIBIT 23

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Tel-Save Holdings, Inc.
New Hope, Pennsylvania

We  hereby  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Prospectus
constituting a part of the Registration Statements on Forms S-8, Nos. 333-04479,
333-005923 and 333-42111 and Forms S-3, Nos. 333-14549,  333-23193 and 333-39787
of our reports dated February 5, 1998,  relating to the  consolidated  financial
statements and schedule of Tel-Save Holdings,  Inc. and subsidiaries,  appearing
in the  Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December  31,
1997.

We also  consent  to the  reference  to us under the  caption  "Experts"  in the
Prospectuses.



BDO Seidman, LLP

New York, New York
March 31, 1998
Written Statement of the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the
undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Midwest Express
Holdings, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, based
on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert S. Bahlman
----------------------------------
Robert S. Bahlman
March 18, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mitchell Jamison, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.) rendered July 6, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate prison term of from twenty-five years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant challenges his conviction on the grounds that insufficient proof was adduced at trial establishing his intent *342to kill the victim. The evidence established that defendant, while smoking cocaine at a crack house, engaged in a dispute with the victim over the amount of crack the victim had smoked. Defendant grabbed a nearby kitchen knife, the blade of which was approximately seven inches in length, and thrust the knife once, upwards into the victim’s chest. The knife pierced the victim’s heart and coronary artery, causing him to hemorrhage and die within approximately fifteen minutes. Two eyewitnesses observed the stabbing, one of whom heard the victim exclaim, "You’re trying to kill me.” Additionally, in the response to the victim’s plaint, "Why did you stab me”, defendant responded, "Because I “like to see blood.” Viewing this evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of murder in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, Jackson v Virginia,*443 US 307, *reh denied*444 US 890).

There was a sufficient predicate in the trial evidence for a jury charge on defendant’s flight as consciousness of guilt. Defendant fled the scene of the crime, failed to return to his place of usual residence, told one of the eyewitnesses the next day he was sorry for his actions and "was going to leave town”, evaded investigating detectives, and was apprehended, approximately four and one-half months later, in St. Louis, Missouri. Such evidence provides sufficient grounds for the jury to find that defendant fled the jurisdiction and that his flight was motivated by a coñscioúsness of guilt *(see, People v Allen,*61 AD2d 619, *affd*48 NY2d 760).

We find no abuse of discretion by the sentencing court.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.7(b)

                   1995 STOCK OPTION AND RETENTION STOCK PLAN
                                       OF
                       UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC.
                       (AMENDED AND RESTATED JUNE 1, 1997)

                                SECOND AMENDMENT


The following represents the SECOND AMENDMENT to the above-referenced Plan, such
amendment having been duly adopted by the Board at its January 21, 1999 meeting.

         1. Section 6(h) of the Plan is amended by inserting the parenthetical
phrase "(unless the Committee shall otherwise determine)" in place of the
parenthetical phrase "(unless the Committee shall provide for shorter periods at
the time the option is granted)".

         2. Section 9(a) of the Plan is amended by deleting, in the second
sentence thereof, the comma after the reference to Section 9(c) and by
inserting, immediately following such deleted comma, the words "or unless the
Committee shall determine otherwise,".

         3. Section 15 of the Plan is amended by adding new subsection (d) as
follows:

         With respect to any amendment to the Plan which becomes effective on or
         after January 21, 1999, if the Company, at any time, desires to engage
         in a transaction which is intended to be accounted for as a pooling of
         interests under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 16 (or any
         successor thereto), and if the existence and/or operation of any such
         amendment would violate Paragraph 47(c) thereof (or any successor
         thereto), then any such amendment shall (in whole or in part to the
         minimum extent necessary to avoid a violation) be deemed null and void
         ab initio and/or the operation of such amendment shall (in whole or in
         part to the minimum extent necessary to avoid a violation) be deemed to
         have no force or effect under law; provided, however, that this
         subsection (d) shall apply only if the transaction is otherwise
         eligible to be accounted for as a pooling of interests.

         4. Section 15 of the Plan is further amended by replacing, in
subsection (c), the word "Appreciate" with the word "Appreciation", thus
correcting a typographical error.



<PAGE>   2



         5. The foregoing amendments are effective January 21, 1999.

         6. Except as amended herein, all other terms and provisions shall
remain in full force and effect.
II 

Calendar No. 293 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1757 

[Report No. 111–143] 

To provide for the prepayment of a repayment contract between the United 

States and the Uintah Water Conservancy District, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 6, 2009 

Mr. BENNETT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

MARCH 2, 2010 

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To provide for the prepayment of a repayment contract between the United States and the Uintah Water Conservancy District, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1757 RS

1 SECTION 1. PREPAYMENT OF CERTAIN REPAYMENT CON2 TRACTS BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND 

3 THE UINTAH WATER CONSERVANCY DIS4 TRICT. 

5 The Secretary of the Interior shall allow for prepay6 ment of the repayment contract no. 6–05–01–00143 be7 tween the United States and the Uintah Water Conser8 vancy District dated June 3, 1976, and supplemented and 

9 amended on November 1, 1985, and on December 30, 

10 1992, providing for repayment of municipal and industrial 

11 water delivery facilities for which repayment is provided 

12 pursuant to such contract, under terms and conditions 

13 similar to those used in implementing section 210 of the 

14 Central Utah Project Completion Act (Public Law 102– 

15 575), as amended. The prepayment— 

16 (1) shall result in the United States recovering 

17 the net present value of all repayment streams that 

18 would have been payable to the United States if this 

19 Act was not in effect; 

20 (2) may be provided in several installments to 

21 reflect substantial completion of the delivery facili22 ties being prepaid, and any increase in the repay23 ment obligation resulting from delivery of water in 

24 addition to the water being delivered under this con25 tract as of the date of enactment of this Act; 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1757 RS

1 (3) shall be adjusted to conform to a final cost 

2 allocation including costs incurred by the Bureau of 

3 Reclamation, but unallocated as of the date of the 

4 enactment of this Act that are allocable to the water 

5 delivered under this contract; 

6 (4) may not be adjusted on the basis of the 

7 type of prepayment financing used by the District; 

8 and 

9 (5) shall be made such that total repayment is 

10 made not later than September 30, 2019. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 293 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1757 

[Report No. 111–143] 

A BILL 

To provide for the prepayment of a repayment conposes. Water Conservancy District, and for other pur- tract between the United States and the Uintah 

MARCH 2, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, Peter Toscano, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Operating Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of International Power Group, Ltd. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: November 3, 2006      /s/Peter ToscanoPeter Toscano(Chief Executive Officer, Principal Operating Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors )
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Joint motion
Docket No: FAA-2016-0459 Dir ID: 2015-NM-081-AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 6/1/15

Regional Airline Association 6/1/15

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 6/1/15

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 6/1/15
| Exhibit 99.4 **GMAC Series 2004-C2****Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to****Certificateholders****for January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004****Ending Principal****Class****Principal****Interest****Balance**R-I 0.00 0.00 0.00 R-II 0.00 0.00 0.00 A-1 2,704,823.18 779,407.86 58,295,176.82 A-1A 338,452.39 1,811,291.03 106,624,547.61 A-2 0.00 1,665,254.28 104,953,000.00 A-3 0.00 1,480,919.40 86,536,000.00 A-4 0.00 7,569,580.60 428,386,000.00 B 0.00 463,402.32 25,678,000.00 C 0.00 190,927.72 10,504,000.00 D 0.00 343,122.00 18,675,000.00 E 0.00 240,560.08 12,839,000.00 F 0.00 196,809.96 10,504,000.00 G 0.00 284,291.44 15,173,000.00 H 0.00 269,199.08 14,006,000.00 J 0.00 96,391.28 5,836,000.00 K 0.00 96,391.28 5,836,000.00 L 0.00 77,116.32 4,669,000.00 M 0.00 38,549.92 2,334,000.00 N 0.00 57,841.36 3,502,000.00 O 0.00 57,824.84 3,501,000.00 P 0.00 211,462.66 12,839,532.00 R-III 0.00 0.00 0.00 X-1 0.00 193,545.41 930,691,256.43 X-2 0.00 1,800,962.90 902,770,000.00 Q 0.00 0.00 0.00 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: John Lawton v. David W. Lawton, Indi vidually, as Former

Independent Executor of The Estate of Joseph G. Lawton, Deceased,

and as Former Agen t for Joseph G. Lawton under a Power of A ttorney

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00193

- CV

Trial court case number: 14

- CCV

- 053769

Trial court: County Court at Law No

. 1 of Fort Bend County

It is ordered that Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing is denied

.

Just ice’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Higley, Huddle, and Lloyd

Date: July 26 , 2016
Exhibit 32.1

Residential Capital, LLC

Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Residential Capital, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|/S/    THOMAS F. MARANO                                              
|Thomas F. Marano Chairman and Chief Executive Officer August 25, 2009



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/S/    JAMES N.
YOUNG                                 
|James N. Young Chief Financial Officer August 25, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### State Department

          - [Public Notice: 7604]

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 10(a)(2), the Department of State announces a meeting of the Foreign Affairs Policy Board to take place on March 19, 2012, at the Department of State, Washington, DC.

The Foreign Affairs Policy Board reviews and assesses: (1) Global threats and opportunities; (2) trends that implicate core national security interests; (3) tools and capacities of the civilian foreign affairs agencies; and (4) priorities and strategic frameworks for U.S. foreign policy. Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 10(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), it has been determined that this meeting will be closed to the public as the Board will be reviewing and discussing matters properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526.

                    For more information, contact Samantha Raddatz at (202) 647-2372. This announcement might appear in the                     **Federal Register**                     less than 15 days prior to the advisory committee meeting. The Department of State finds: (1) That there is an exceptional circumstance to hold this meeting with less than a 15-day notice, in that a senior government official must address this committee meeting, and (2) further postponing this meeting to accommodate this official's schedule would result in an unacceptable delay in the work of this advisory committee.                

Dated: February 29, 2012.

Dan Kurtz-Phelan,

Designated Federal Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-5407 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
# L_2006164EN.01002001.xml

| 16.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/20

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 878/2006

of 15 June 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed-milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed-milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed-milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 13 June 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 13 June 2006.

| (3) | The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 13 June 2006, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 5,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 June 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 409/2006 (OJ L 71, 10.3.2006, p. 5).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1814/2005 (OJ L 292, 8.11.2005, p. 3).

3

---