CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM – Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Mojave Desert Air Quality Management Dis trict

Rule No(s): 1116 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: 08/23/10

Rule Title(s): Automotive Refinishing Operations

Date Submitted to ARB: 07/22/10

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): 06/28/10

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Karen K. Nowak Phone Number: (760) 245-1661 x6810 E-mail Address: k2nowak@mdaqmd.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The amendment to Rule 1116 is only necessary to cor rect the typographical error made on the 06/28/10

amendment. The VOC limits contained in the previou s version (04/26/99) were intended to be continued in effect

until the new VOC limits generated from the SCM bec ome effective on 07/01/11. The prior limits were

inadvertently removed due to typographical error. This action restores the prior VOC limits to be eff ective until

07/01/11 when the new limits, as adopted on 06/28/1 0, become applicable.

The sustantive amendments to Rule 1116 were adopted in the 06/28/10. These amendments to Rule 1116

modified the coating categories and VOC limits in a ccordance with the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB)

Suggested Control Measure (SCM) for Automotive Refi nishing Coatings as adopted on October 20, 2005.

Concurrently with the amendments generated from the SCM, the 06/28/10 revision of Rule 1116 included

proposed amendments generated from 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHHHH: National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants: Paint Stripping and Misce llaneous Surface Coating Operations at Area Sources

(HHHHHH), as well as, the Air Toxic Control Measure for Emissions of Hexavalent Chromium and Cadmium f rom

Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coatings (ATCM) (title 17 CCR, section 93112).

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):chromium, lead, manganese,

nickel, and cadmium, hexavalent chromium, methylene chloride.

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when imp lemented, will result in quantifiable changes in em issions. Attach reference(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculatio n sheet showing how the emission information provid ed below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Sourc e Category: No change.

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissio ns: N/A Area Affected: Entire District.

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) : No change.CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measu re: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the C ontrol Measure: No change.

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any):

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed):

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluati on Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emis sion forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Source s Affected by this Amendment: 60

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0.05 %

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0 %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) :

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Cont inuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) C of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Re ductions are:

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): C Work Practice Standards in Section(s): E

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): F Reporting Requirements in Section(s):5/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: N/A