alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1825 

AN ACT 

To extend the authority for relocation expenses test programs 

for Federal employees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1825 ES

1 SECTION 1. RELOCATION EXPENSES TEST PROGRAMS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5739 of title 5, United 

3 States Code, is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (3); 

5 (2) in subsection (b)— 

6 (A) by inserting ‘‘or extended’’ after ‘‘ap7 proved’’; and 

8 (B) by inserting ‘‘or extension’’ after ‘‘of 

9 the program’’; 

10 (3) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the 

11 following: 

12 ‘‘(c)(1) An agency authorized to conduct a test pro13 gram under subsection (a) shall annually submit a report 

14 on the results of the program to date to the Administrator. 

15 ‘‘(2) Not later than 3 months after completion of a 

16 test program, the agency conducting the program shall 

17 submit a final report on the results of the program to the 

18 Administrator and the appropriate committees of Con19 gress.’’; 

20 (4) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘10’’ and in21 serting ‘‘12’’; and 

22 (5) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the 

23 following: 

24 ‘‘(e)(1) The Administrator may not approve any test 

25 program for an initial period of more than 4 years. 
3 

†S 1825 ES

1 ‘‘(2)(A) Upon the request of the agency admin2 istering a test program, the Administrator may extend the 

3 program. 

4 ‘‘(B) An extension under subparagraph (A) may not 

5 exceed 4 years. 

6 ‘‘(C) The Administrator may exercise more than 1 

7 extension under subparagraph (A) with respect to any test 

8 program.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect 

10 on December 18, 2009. 

Passed the Senate November 9, 2009. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1825 

AN ACT 

To extend the authority for relocation expenses test 

purposes. programs for Federal employees, and for other
AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE NOTES


AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT



This Amendment to Convertible Note Purchase Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into this 30th day of April, 2010, by and among Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") and WB QT, LLC (the "Lender").



WHEREAS, the Company and Lender are parties to that certain Convertible Note Purchase Agreement dated January 16, 2008 (the "Purchase Agreement");



WHEREAS, the Company and Lender now desire to amend the Purchase Agreement.



The Company and Lender hereby agree as follows:






	Section 6.10(b) and Section 6.10(c) is deleted in its entirety.


	Section 6.11(b) is amended by deleting the requirements described in (ii), (iii) and (iv).

This Agreement is made and entered into on the date first written above.

 

QUANTUM FUEL SYSTEMS

TECHNOLOGIES WORLDWIDE, INC.WB QT, LLC



 

By:/s/ Kenneth R. LombardoBy:/s/ Jonathan Wood

      Kenneth R. Lombardo

Its: Vice PresidentIts:Director
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1945 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1945

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Triticonazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

  Mr. Isakson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Triticonazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRITICONAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Triticonazole (CAS  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        No. 131983-72-7)                                                   31/2011.......
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2933.99.22)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raul Quian, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), rendered May 26, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Prior to the entry of his plea of guilty, the defendant withdrew all pretrial motions and thereby waived his right to appellate review of the denial of those branches of his omnibus motion which dealt with suppression issues *(see, People v Mangham,*167 AD2d 487; *People v Jackson,*142 AD2d 689). Moreover, by failing to move to vacate his plea or to set aside his conviction on the ground that that waiver was not knowing and voluntary, the defendant failed to preserve the waiver issue for appellate review *(see, People v Ricciardi,*121 AD2d 407). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: L.R.J.P., A

MINOR

PETITION OF: B.P., FATHER :

:

:

:

: No. 111 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: J.M.C.P., A

MINOR

PETITION OF: B.P., FATHER :

:

:

:

: No. 112 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of April, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Chris Craddock, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Sky Harvest Windpower Corp. (the Company) hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      period ended February 28, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                    

Date: April 13, 2010

/s/ Chris CraddockChris CraddockChief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer, Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sky Harvest
Windpower Corp. and will be retained by Sky Harvest Windpower Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CBRE Realty Finance, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Angerthal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Michael AngerthalMichael AngerthalChief Financial Officer


May 15, 2007
#### Giuseppe Ferraro et al., Appellants, v Balice Fashions, Inc., et al., Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gagliardi, J.H.O.), entered November 19, 1989, which granted the defendants’ motion to vacate a judgment entered September 22, 1989, upon their default in appearing at an examination before trial, on condition that they appear for an examination before trial within a specified time period.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the time to conduct the examination before trial is extended until 30 days after service upon the defendants of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry; and it is further,

Ordered that the examination before trial shall be conducted at a time and place to be set in a written notice of at least 10 days to be served by the plaintiffs upon the defendants, or at such time and place as the parties may agree.

We find that the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in vacating the defendants’ default pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1). The default was unintentional and resulted from law office failure on the part of the defendants’ former attorney, who was later suspended from the practice of law *(see,*CPLR 2005; *see, Searing v Anand,*127 AD2d 582, 583). In addition, we conclude that there are meritorious defenses to the plaintiffs’ claims, and that, under the circumstances of this case, it was not an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the application to have the judgment stand as security pending trial *(cf., A. G. Serv. Co. v Interboro Contr.,*64 AD2d 880). Thompson, J. P., Fiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
#### Virginia Rose McDonnell vs. John James McDonnell.

No. 94-P-499.

November 17, 1995.

*Practice, Civil,*Interlocutory appeal, Assembly of record. *Divorce and Separation,*Appeal.

The parties executed a settlement agreement in this divorce action after discussions with the judge in chambers. The agreement was incorporated in the divorce judgment but was to retain independent legal significance except as to alimony. Two weeks after the entry of the judgment nisi, the wife filed-a motion under Mass.R.Dom.Rel.P. 60(b) (3) (1975), seeking to vacate the judgment based on alleged misrepresentations by the husband as to finances during the discussions in chambers. After hearing, the judge allowed the motion, and the husband has appealed.

The order vacating the judgment necessarily contemplated further proceedings in the Probate Court in the divorce; action. As such, the order was *933interlocutory. See *Chavoor*v. *Lewis,*383 Mass. 801, 803 (1981); *Carista*v. *Berkshire Mut. Ins. Co.,*394 Mass. 1009, 1009-1010 (1985). The case falls within the general rule that the correctness of an interlocutory order will not be reviewed on appeal before a final judgment has been entered. *Mancuso*v. *Mancuso,*10 Mass. App. Ct. 395, 396-397 (1980). Compare *Borman*v. *Borman,*378 Mass. 775, 779-780 (1979), recognizing exception for certain types of interlocutory orders presently to be executed; *Chavoor*v. *Lewis, supra*at 804-806, recognizing exception if judge was without jurisdiction to enter order under rule 60(b); *Berube*v. *McKesson Wine & Spirits Co.,*7 Mass. App. Ct. 426, 429 (1979), applying exception where a single justice of an appellate court has authorized prosecution of an interlocutory appeal. The husband did not err by filing the notice of appeal, because G. L. c. 215, § 9, authorizes appeals from interlocutory orders in the Probate Courts. The appeal, however, should have lain dormant pending entry of a new judgment nisi. See *Mancuso*v. *Mancuso, supra*at 400-402, and *R.J.A.*v. *K.A.V.,*34 Mass. App. Ct. 369, 375 (1993). The procedural error was in the issuance of the notice of assembly prematurely. *Mancuso*v. *Mancuso, supra*at 402.

*George V. Holland, Jr.,*for John James McDonnell.

*Susanne M. Riley*for Virginia Rose McDonnell.

The case is remanded to the Probate Court with instructions that the notice of assembly of the record issued on April 4, 1994, and the notice of supplemental assembly of record on appeal issued on May 17, 1994, are to be vacated. Neither party is to have costs of appeal.

*So ordered.*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (the Trust) and iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Investing Pool
LLC (the Investing Pool) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Latham, Chief Financial Officer of Barclays
Global Investors International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust and Manager of the Investing Pool, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust and Investing
Pool.

Date: August 7, 2008



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Michael A. Latham        
|Michael A. Latham *          
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and the Co-Registrant is a limited liability company and Mr. Latham is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors
International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant and Manager of the Co-Registrant.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 12

                          MINN DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE
              COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF NET PROCEEDS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Year Ended August 31,
                                          -------------------------------------------------------------

                                             1998         1997         1996         1995         1994
<S>                                          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>   
Earnings:
Net proceeds before income taxes
  from continuing operations                 72,084       74,239       56,872       75,422       33,643
Fixed charges, excluding capitalized
  interest, see below                         5,372        4,316        2,898        2,973        1,557
Amortization of capitalized interest             92           55           18           18           18
                                          ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------

       Net Proceeds                          77,548       78,610       59,788       78,413       35,218
                                          =========    =========    =========    =========    =========


Fixed Charges:
Interest Expense                              5,372        4,316        2,898        2,973        1,557
Interest factor included in rentals(1)           --           --           --           --           --
                                          ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------

Fixed charges, excluding capitalized
  interest                                    5,372        4,316        2,898        2,973        1,557
       Interest capitalized                     199          954          669           --           --
                                          ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------

Fixed charges                                 5,571        5,270        3,567        2,973        1,557
                                          =========    =========    =========    =========    =========

Ratio of net proceeds to fixed charges        13.92        14.92        16.76        26.38        22.62
                                          =========    =========    =========    =========    =========
</TABLE>

(1)   The company does lease certain items, such as office equipment. Due to the
      proportionately small amounts involved, interest on such lease payments
      has not been included in the total of the company's fixed charges of the
      calculation of this ratio.
|        |                                         |                                                                      |        |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle  |                                                                 |
|   |                                    |                                                                 |   |
|   | By:                                     | /s/ Christina J. Gehrke                                              |   |
|   |                                    | Christina J. Gehrke                                                  |   |
|   |                                    | Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting and Administrative Officer * |   |
|   |                                    |                                                            |   |

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| * | The Chief Accounting and Administrative Officer for purposes of the Seattle Bank's disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting performs similar functions as a principal financial officer. |
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsCommentaries     Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians
        
            Commentaries
 Keyword
 Type Select a CategoryTop StoriesMission/TrainingFeaturesSecretary of the AFAF Chief of StaffChief Master Sgt. of the AFCommentariesSequestration NewsSpace/TechnologyHumanitarianAFSO 21Women's History Month 1-15EnvironmentalWarrior CareDiversityDignified TransferSafetyHeritageAir Force FamilyPersonnel MattersCommander's Call TopicsHaiti Earthquake ReliefDon't Ask Don't TellSuicide PreventionWarrior GamesEnergyAircraftEtchbergerSexual AssaultOperation TomodachiOperation Odyssey Dawn2011 Appropriations InformationHurricane Irene9/11AFAWeek in PhotosThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their Words2012 Appropriations InformationAfrican American History MonthAfrican American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29Fiscal Year BudgetAir Force StoriesColorado WildfireChief of Staff ArchiveHurricane IsaacAFA 2012APP RSSAPP Airman VisualsExpeditionary OperationsHurricane SandyTransition GPSAir Force in SpaceSports/RecreationH1N1Women's History Month 16-30Oklahoma Tornado ReliefMemorial DayCOVID-19 CommentariesCOVID-19
 RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 July 30, 2021I am part of Team 19
        Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass and her team visited Offutt Air Force Base to visit with Airmen, the sixth chief master sergeant of the Air Force and to learn more about their mission.  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### MICHAEL CONSTANTOPOULOS *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

*Todd Edgington,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Decided April 28, 1998

The petitioner Michael Constantopoulos’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 828 (AC 16293), is denied.