alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10-Q Exhibit 32.1: Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iShares Silver Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee T. Kranefuss, Chief Executive Officer of Barclays Global Investors International Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007      
|                             
|/s/ LEE T. KRANEFUSS         
|Lee T. Kranefuss *           
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Kranefuss is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors International Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roberto Norman, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Corriero, J.), rendered October 19, 1989, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree (two counts), attempted rape in the first degree (two counts), sexual abuse in the first degree, and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that certain comments made by the prosecutor during summation deprived him of a fair trial is without merit. Most of the comments to which the defendant objects can be regarded as fair response to defense counsel’s summation *(see, People v Saylor,*115 AD2d 671; *People v Garcia,*110 AD2d 659). Those that cannot be so regarded did not, under the circumstances of this case, deprive the defendant of a fair trial.

The sentence imposed was neither unduly harsh nor exces*867sive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Brown, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Karen M. Spaun, Senior Vice President and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Karen M. Spaun

Karen M. Spaun
Senior Vice President and Acting Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 99.6**

 

**MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION**

 

# **March 26, 2004**

 

For the year ended December 31,2003, CRIIMI MAE Financial Corporation’s monthly Payment Date Statementsprovided by U.S. Bank National Association as successor to the trust businessof State Street Bank & Trust Company are representative of informationcontained in underlying monthly servicer reports and are mathematicallyaccurate. The CRIIMI MAE Financial Corporation 7% Collateralized MortgageObligations Annual Report for 2003 is mathematically accurate and the amountsdisclosed agree to the monthly Payment Date Statements.

 

 
|   | /s/ Barry  Blattman                    |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Barry  Blattman                        |
|   | Chairman of  the Board                 |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer               |
|   |                                   |
|   |                                   |
|   | /s/ Mark  Jarrell                      |   |
|   | Mark Jarrell                           |
|   | President                              |
|   | Chief  Operating Officer               |
|   |                                   |
|   |                                   |
|   | /s/ Cynthia  O. Azzara                 |   |
|   | Cynthia O.  Azzara                     |
|   | Executive  Vice President              |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|   |                                   |
|   |                                   |
|   | /s/ Eugene  J. Bredow                  |   |
|   | Eugene J.  Bredow                      |
|   | Vice  President                        |
|   | Corporate  Controller                  |

 

----
# C_2007006EN.01000101.xml

| 11.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4485 — MEIF II/Techem)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 6/01)

On 19 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4485. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4485. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
# e_

~ - 

# yS71 

# ~ lnventorvExpertService A division of the American Chemical Sociefy Phone: 800-831-1884, 614-447-3870 Fax:614-447-3747 E-mail: answers@cas.org Web: www.cas.org/products/other-cas-products/cfient-services/


## INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT

IES Order Number: 373562-2 Registry Nuinber: 1502809-56-4 CA Index Name: Phosphoric acid, mixed Bu and decyl and octyl and 2-(2-phenoxyethoxy)ethyi and 2-phenoxyeY.hyl esters, potassium salts

Please print the above CA lndex Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. 

# El If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. Piease make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA. CAS - 2540 Olentangy River Road - P.O. Box 3343 - Columbus, OH 43210-0334 - USA
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.61 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, Loglines, RPPOB, March 2019, Replensihment Parts Purchase or Borrow Program

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

> 
(1) I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P. 

 

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation      General Partner

/S/ Kelly Tucek                             

Name: Kelly TucekTitle: Vice President of the General Partner and
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramon Liriano, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), rendered August 6, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

The defendant contends that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to support the judgment of conviction. We disagree. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant, along with several others, knowingly and unlawfully possessed and sold a large quantity of cocaine *(see,*Penal Law § 220.43 [1]; § 220.18 [1]; § 220.16 [1]).

However, reversal of the judgment of conviction is warranted due to the trial court’s erroneous *Sandoval*ruling. Over defense counsel’s strenuous objection, the court granted the prosecutor permission to cross-examine the defendant, in the event that he chose to testify, as to whether, on an earlier occasion, he had been found in possession of a quantity of crack cocaine. This ruling was made despite evidence before the court indicating that at that time the defendant had been stopped by the police while driving in his livery cab. A *490passenger in the vehicle acknowledged ownership of the drugs, and the defendant was released without being charged with a crime. The basis for the ruling was explained later in the proceedings, when it became clear that the court had been acting under the misapprehension, brought about by its refusal to read some papers proffered by defense counsel, that the defendant was "the unindicted co-conspirator” in the earlier case. Unfortunately, the court did not change its prior ruling after being made aware of the actual circumstances surrounding the prior arrest. The court’s ruling was error, as it is clear from the record that the People failed to establish "a reasonable basis in fact for the allegations [of the defendant’s complicity in a previous drug transaction] and a good-faith basis for making the inquiry” *(People v Hernandez,*127 AD2d 790, 791; *accord, People v De Pasquale,*54 NY2d 693; *People v Greer,*42 NY2d 170, 176). Moreover, under the circumstances of this case, where the defendant claimed to have been an innocent bystander and the evidence adduced against him was less than overwhelming, the trial court’s ruling cannot be considered harmless *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230; *cf., People v Hernandez,*127 AD2d 790, *supra).*

In light of the foregoing, we decline to address the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (the Trust) and iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Investing Pool
LLC (the Investing Pool) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Latham, Chief Financial Officer of
Barclays Global Investors International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust and Manager of the Investing Pool, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust and Investing
Pool.

Date: November 7, 2008



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael A. Latham                                                    
|Michael A. Latham * Chief Financial Officer
(Principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and the Co-Registrant is a limited liability company and Mr. Latham is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors
International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant and Manager of the Co-Registrant.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 10.01


VantageMed
Executive EBITDA Bonus Plan


Q4-2006
through Q4-2007


	
  Bonus Pool

  Computation

  	
   

  	
  Flat Bonus

  Payment if

  EBITDA is 0%

  to 5%

  	
   

  	
  % of EBITDA if

  EBITDA is

  Between 5% and

  10%

  	
   

  	
  % of EBITDA if

  EBITDA is

  Between 10% to

  15%

  	
   

  
	
  CEO

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  10,500

  	
   

  	
  7.35

  	
  %

  	
  8.00

  	
  %

  
	
  CFO

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  7,500

  	
   

  	
  5.25

  	
  %

  	
  5.75

  	
  %

  
	
  COO

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  7,500

  	
   

  	
  5.25

  	
  %

  	
  5.75

  	
  %

  
	
  EVP Marketing

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  7,500

  	
   

  	
  5.25

  	
  %

  	
  5.75

  	
  %

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Total Bonus Pool

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  33,000

  	
   

  	
  23.10

  	
  %

  	
  25.25

  	
  %

  



 


Adjustments


(1) 50% of the
calculated pool is forfeited if the quarterly projected revenue is not met or
exceeded
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 5, 2018

No. 04-17-00492-CR

Oscar Mauricio Paredes PEREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR10052

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on January 22, 2018. The appellant’s 

first motion for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to 

February 21, 2018. 

On February 21, 2018, the appellant filed a motion requesting an additional thirty-day 

extension of time to March 23, 2018. By order dated February 23, 2018, this court granted the 

motion and extended the deadline to March 23, 2018. Our order stated, “THIS IS THE FINAL 

EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE APPELLANT WILL BE GRANTED. The 

Appellant’s brief must be filed by March 23, 2018.”

Appellant’s brief was not filed by March 23, 2018. By order dated March 28, 2018, 

appellant’s attorney was ordered to file a written response in this court stating a reasonable 

explanation for failing to timely file the brief and demonstrating the steps being taken to remedy 

the deficiency.

On March 30, 2018, appellant’s attorney filed a written response and third motion for 

extension of time to file the brief. In the response, appellant’s attorney initially refers to her 

caseload but then sets forth extenuating circumstances, notably the hospitalization of her 

associate attorney, which provide a reasonable explanation for the failure to timely file the brief. 

It is therefore ORDERED that the motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief 

must be filed no later than April 23, 2018. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL 
BE GRANTED. If appellant’s brief is not filed by April 23, 2018, this appeal will be abated to 

the trial court for an abandonment hearing, and the trial court will be asked to consider whether 

sanctions are appropriate. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2).

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of April, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5185]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 6, 2012, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), IMS Global Learning 
Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Dell Services, Plano, TX; Keller ISD, Keller, TX; 
Maryland State Department of Education, Baltimore, MD; Measured 
Progress, Dover, NH; Minnesota Department of Education, Division of 
Research and Assessment, Roseville, MN; Orange County School District, 
Orlando, FL; Rhode Island Department of Elementary and Secondary 
Education Office of Instruction, Assessment, and Curriculum, 
Providence, RI; State of New Hampshire, Office of Curriculum and 
Assessment, Concord, NH; and Utah State Office of Education, Salt Lake 
City, UT, have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Wimba, New 
York, NY, and Giunti Labs, Atlanta, GA, have withdrawn as parties to 
this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 
55283).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 28, 
2011. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on December 21, 2011 (76 FR 79217).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-5185 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P