alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.83


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned,  (jointly and severally,  if more than
one) promises to pay to CARL SCHMIDT  ENTERPRISES,  INC., a Florida corporation,
formerly known as SCHMIDT  ENTERPRISES,  INC., a corporation  existing under the
laws of the state of Florida, or order, in the manner hereinafter specified, the
principal  sum  of  EIGHT  HUNDRED  TWENTY-FIVE   THOUSAND  AND  XX/100  DOLLARS
($825,000.00)  with interest from date at the rate of 8.00 per cent per annum on
the balance from time to time remaining unpaid.  The said principal and interest
shall be payable in lawful  money of the United  States of America at 3570 Hield
Road,  Melbourne,  Florida 32935 or at such place as may hereafter be designated
by written  notice from the holder to the maker  hereof,  on the date and in the
manner following; PAYABLE IN EQUAL MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS OF TEN THOUSAND NINE AND
53/100  ($10,009.53)  DOLLARS PER MONTH COMMENCING JULY 17, 1997 AND ON THE 17TH
DAY OF EACH AND EVERY  MONTH  THEREAFTER  UNTIL PAID IN FULL.  THERE SHALL BE NO
PREPAYMENT  PENALTY.  ANY PAYMENT NOT POSTMARKED  WITHIN 15 DAYS OF ITS DUE DATE
SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A LATE PENALTY OF FIVE PERCENT (5%).

     This note with  interest is secured by a mortgage on real  estate,  of even
date herewith, made by the maker hereof in favor of the said payee, and shall be
construed and enforced according to the laws of the State of Florida.

     If default be made in the payment of any of the sums or interest  mentioned
herein  or in said  mortgage,  or in the  performance  of any of the  agreements
contained herein or in said mortgage,  then the entire principal sum and accrued
interest  shall  at the  option  of the  holder  hereof  become  at once due and
collectible  without notice,  time being of the essence;  and said principal sum
and accrued  interest  shall both bear interest from such time until paid at the
highest  rate  allowable  under the laws of the  State of  Florida.  Failure  to
exercise this option shall not  constitute a waiver of the right to exercise the
same in the event of any subsequent default.

     Each  person  liable  hereon  whether  maker  or  endorser,  hereby  waives
presentment,  protest,  notice,  notice of protest  and notice if  dishonor  and
agrees to pay all costs,  including a reasonable attorney's fee, whether suit be
brought or not, if, after maturity of this note or default  hereunder,  or under
said mortgage,  counsel shall be employed to collect this note or to protect the
security of said mortgage.

     Whenever  used herein the terms  "holder",  "maker"  and  "payee"  shall be
construed in the singular or plural as the context require or admit.

                                   FIRST CHOICE AUTO FINANCE, INC.
                                   

                                   By: /s/ James Neal Hutchinson, Jr.
                                   ----------------------------------
                                       JAMES NEAL HUTCHINSON, JR.
                                       VICE PRESIDENT

Maker's address:

5200 S.  WASHINGTON AVENUE
TITUSVILLE, FL 32780
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 70875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28769]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8092]

Department of State Performance Review Board Members

    In accordance with section 4314(c)(4) of 5 United States Code, the 
Department of State has appointed the following individuals to the 
Department of State Performance Review Board for Senior Executive 
Service members: Mary E. McLeod, Chairperson, Principal Deputy Legal 
Advisor, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State; Kevin P. 
O'Keefe, Director, Office of Plans, Policy, and Analysis, Bureau of 
Political-Military Affairs, Department of State; David A. Balton, 
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Oceans and International 
Environmental and Scientific Affairs, Department of State; Raymond D. 
Maxwell, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, 
Department of State.

    Dated: November 19, 2012.
Linda Thomas-Greenfield,
Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human 
Resources, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-28769 Filed 11-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-15-P
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-60268 Summary Calendar

CESAR ALBERTO MARTINEZ-CAMPOS, Petitioner,

versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

No. A71-774-283

- - - - - - - - - - March 14, 2000 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Cesar Alberto Martinez-Campos, a native and citizen of El
Salvador, has petitioned this court to review a determina tion by

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that he is not eligible

for asylum. Petitioner’s one brief detention, although accompanied
by beating, occurred eight years ago before the end of El
Salvador’s civil war. There is insufficient evidence to show a

well-founded fear of persecution when Martinez-Campos returns to El Salvador. We DENY Martinez-Campos’s petition because the record2

shows that th e BIA’s determination is supported by substantial
evidence. C arbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir.
1996).

PETITION DENIED

.
Mark Fritz

3360 Liga road Atascadero, CA. 93422 (805)952

-3390 Markfritz88@yahoo.com Petitioning for Exemption under Section 333 Regulations from which the exemption is requested: 14 CFR Part 21 14 CFR 45.23 (b) 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.7 (a) 14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2) 14 CFR 91.103 14 CFR 91.109 14 CFR 91.119 14 CFR 91.121 14 CFR 91.151 (a) 14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.405 (a) 14 CFR 407 (a) (1) 14 CFR 409 (a) (2) 14 CFR 417 (a) & (b) The extent of relief you seek and the reason you seek the reli ef; I’m requesting exemptions from the above regulations in order to operate my Yuneec Typhoon Q500 UAS primarily to conduct aerial photography and videography for homeowners, realtors , home builders, home contractors, and/or home inspectors for real estate marketing and inspections of home for sale in my area of Atascadero, California. How your request would benefit the public as a whole: This request will benefit the public by helping the real estate community and homeowners lower cost of using highly costly alternatives for taking aerial photos. Reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to the existing rule: This exemption will not adversely affect safety due to the user flying the UAV (myself) abiding by all the limitations described below:

- Follow community based safety guidelines, as developed by organizations such as the Academy of Model Aeronautics.

- Fly no higher than 400 feet and remain below any surrounding obstacles when possible.

- Keep my UAS in eyesight at all times, and use an observer to assist if needed.

- Remain well clear of and do not interfere with manned aircraft operations, and I will avoid other aircraft and obstacles at all times

.

- Do not intentionally fly over unprotected persons or moving vehicles , and remain at least 25 feet away from individuals and vulnerable property.

- Contact the airport or control tower before flying within five miles of an airport.- Do not fly in adverse weather conditions such as in high winds or reduced visibility.

- Do not fly under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

- Ensure the operating environment is safe and that the operator is competent and proficient in the operation of the UAS.

- Do not fly near or over sensitive infrastructure or property such as power stations, water treatment facilities, correctional facilities, heavily traveled roadways, government facilities, etc.

- Check and follow all local laws and ordinances before flying over private prop erty.

- Do not conduct surveillance or photograph persons in areas where there is an expectation of privacy without the individuals permission (see AMAs privacy policy).

- I will also be abiding by all safety precautions described in the Yuneec Typhoon Q500 flying guide + User manual. Thanks for your consideration concerning this Petitioning for exemption.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Execute Sports, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Geno
      M.
      Apicella, Chief Executive Officer and Principle Accounting Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      the
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      the
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated:
                April 30,
                2008
              
              
              /s/
                Geno M.
                ApicellaGeno
                M. ApicellaChief
                    Executive Officer and
                  Principle
                    Accounting
                    Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
250 Airside Drive Moon Township, PA 15108 Tel. 412-809-6000 water.info@veoliawater.com www.vwsoilandgas.com
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caribou Coffee Company, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 2, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
George E. Mileusnic, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

August 11, 2006

                                   /s/ George E. Mileusnic
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   George E. Mileusnic
                                   Chief Financial Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6471

KEVIUNTAE HYTOWER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:22

- ct

- 03173

- D )

Submitted : December 19 , 2023 Decided: December 27, 2023

Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM , and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Keviuntae Hytower, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6471 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Keviuntae Hytower appeals the district court’s order s dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act , 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671

- 80 , and denying his motion s to amend the complaint and for
reconsideration

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court ’ s order s
. Hytower v. United States , No. 5:22

- ct

- 03 173

- D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 6, 2022, Jan. 31, 2023, & Mar. 6 , 202 3 ). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6471 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
## GHCN-Monthly Version 2

Introduction
The Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN-Mon thly) data base contains historical temperature, precipitation, and pressure data for thousands of land stations worldwide. The period of record varies fro m station to station, with several thousand extending back to 1950 and several hundred being updated monthly via CLIMAT reports. The data are available without charge through NCDC’s anonymous FTP service.
Both historical and near-real-time GHCN data underg o rigorous quality assurance reviews. These reviews include preprocess ing checks on source data, time series checks that identify spurious changes i n the mean and variance, spatial comparisons that verify the accuracy of the climatological mean and the seasonal cycle, and neighbor checks that identify o utliers from both a serial and a spatial perspective.
GHCN-Monthly is used operationally by NCDC to monit or long-term trends in temperature and precipitation. It has also been emp loyed in several international climate assessments, including the Intergovernmenta l Panel on Climate Change 4th Assessment Report, the Arctic Climate Impact As sessment, and the "State of the Climate" report published annually by the Bulle tin of the American Meteorological Society.

Photo courtesy Grant Goodge/NCDC
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/ghcn-monthly/in dex.php Created by Jon.Burroughs@noaa.gov Downloaded Friday, 23-Jul-2010 13:35:54 EDT Last Updated Wednesday, 20-Aug-2008 12:11:35 EDT by Jon.Burroughs@noaa.gov Please see

the NCDC Contact Page if you have

questions or comments. 

## Page 1 of 1 GHCN

- Monthly Version 2

7/23/2010 http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/ghcn

- monthly/index.php
#### Selvenia WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. M-83-674.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 12, 1985.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 7, 1985.

*168Selvenia Willis, Pro Se.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., Tomilou Gentry Liddell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma' City, for appellee.

OPINION

PARKS, Presiding Judge:

On appeal from her conviction of Soliciting for Prostitution, Case No. CRM-82-1415, and sentence of thirty (30) days imprisonment from the District Court of Comanche County, Oklahoma, the appellant, Selvenia Willis, raises three assignments of error. We hold the assignments of error to be without merit, and affirm the judgment and sentence of the District Court.

In her first assignment of error, appellant claims that the police had no probable cause to approach her or arrest her. This contention has no merit. In this case, an undercover officer merely approached the appellant and asked to walk with her. Once the couple entered her apartment and appellant solicited sex with the officer, she was arrested. The encounter on the street between the police officer and appellant did not even reach the level of citizen encounter contemplated in *Terry v. Ohio,*392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) and, therefore, did not require probable cause or even reasonable suspicion. *See United States v. Mendenhall,*446 U.S. 544, 100 S.Ct. 1870, 64 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980). The arrest occurred after the officers had witnessed a crime; therefore, probable cause existed for the arrest, and no warrant was needed. *Finch v. State,*644 P.2d 1378 (Okl.Cr.1982).

Appellant next claims that the transmission of her conversation with the police officer via the hidden microphone was an unconstitutional search and an invasion of her privacy. This, too, is without merit, as appellant could not have had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a conversation with a stranger; therefore, there was no search. *Finch v. State,*supra, Cf. *Pearson v. State,*556 P.2d 1025 (Okl.Cr.1976).

Finally, appellant contends her arrest was the result of an entrapment. The trial judge did not instruct the jury on entrapment, as the defense had not been properly presented. The defense of entrapment is available only when a defendant is induced to commit a crime she would not otherwise have committed. It is not entrapment for the police simply to furnish a defendant with the opportunity to commit a crime. *Taylor v. State,*621 P.2d 1184 (Okl.Cr.1980). Furthermore, appellant had continually insisted she did not commit the crime at all. This is inconsistent with the defense of entrapment. *Neilson v. State,*639 P.2d 615 (Okl.Cr.1981).

Accordingly, after reviewing the record, we find the judgment and sentence should be AFFIRMED.

*169BRETT, J., concurs.

BUSSEY, J., not participating.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-541]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Seventeenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 213, Enhanced Flight 
Vision/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 213, Enhanced Flight Vision/
Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
seventeenth meeting of RTCA Special Committee 213, Enhanced Flight 
Vision/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS).

DATES: The meeting will be held February 7-9, 2012, from 8 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Universal Avionics Systems 
Corporation, 3260 E. Universal Way, Tucson, AZ 85756.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a Special Committee 213, Enhanced Flight Vision/
Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS). The agenda will include the 
following:

February 7, 2012

    <bullet> Introductions and Administrative Items
    <bullet> Review and approve minutes from last full plenary meeting
    <bullet> Introductions and administrative items
    <bullet> Review and approve minutes from last full plenary meeting
    <bullet> ED-179B status and update

February 8, 2012

<bullet> Plenary discussion (0800-1700, including breaks and lunch)
    <bullet> Work Group 2 (VS) Discussion
    <bullet> Work Group 1 (SVS/CVS) break discussion out if needed

February 9, 2012

<bullet> Plenary discussion (0800-1500, including breaks and lunch)
    <bullet> E Work Group 1 and 2 Update
    <bullet> Administrative items (meeting schedule)
<bullet> Adjourn at 1500

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 5, 2012.
John Raper,
Manager, Business Operations Branch, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-541 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### Leon Auerbach, Appellant, v David Kaufman et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on July 18, 1990, which, *inter alia,*granted defendants’ CPLR 3404 motion to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the action reinstated, with costs.

This accounting action was improperly dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404. No note of issue was ever filed in the case and there is no evidence in either the Referee’s scheduling papers or the Supreme Court Clerk’s minutes indicating that the action had been marked or struck from the calendar.

*230Further there is no showing that the action went unanswered on a clerk’s calendar call. As such, the Court improperly dismissed this action pursuant to CPLR 3404. *(See, Trustees of Town of Southampton v Heilner,*143 AD2d 134; *Thompson v Thompson,*103 AD2d 772.)

The plaintiff has demonstrated merit since the agreement, on its face, calls for an accounting. We further note that this action was not dismissable for general delay in filing a note of issue, since defendants never served the 90-day notice required under CPLR 3216 (b) (3). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin, Wallach and Asch, JJ.
Exhibit 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                          LOUNSBERRY HOLDINGS III, INC.

      LOUNSBERRY HOLDINGS III, INC., a corporation  organized and existing under
and by virtue of the  General  Corporation  Law of the State of  Delaware,  does
hereby certify as follows:

      FIRST: That the Board of Directors of said corporation, by the unanimous
written consent of its members, filed with the minutes of the Board, adopted the
following resolution proposing and declaring advisable the following amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation:

      RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of Lounsberry Holdings
III, Inc. be amended by changing Article 1 to read as follows:

1. The name of the corporation is China Medicine Corporation (the
"Corporation").

      SECOND: The foregoing amendment was duly approved and adopted by the
directors and stockholders of said corporation in accordance with the applicable
provisions of Section 242 and Section 228(a) of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have made, signed and subscribed this Certificate of
Amendment this 9th day of May 2006, and affirm that the statements contained
herein are true under penalties of perjury.

                                           /s/ Senshan Yang
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Senshan Yang, Chief Executive Officer