Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2012 / Notices 12559 

by the total entered values associated 

with those transactions. For dutyassessment rates calculated on this 

basis, we will direct CBP to assess the 

resulting ad valorem rate against the 

entered customs values for the subject 

merchandise. Where appropriate, we 

calculated a per-unit rate for each 

importer (or customer) by dividing the 

total dumping margins for reviewed 

sales to that party by the total sales 

quantity associated with those 

transactions. For duty-assessment rates 

calculated on this basis, we will direct 

CBP to assess the resulting per-unit rate 

against the entered quantity of the 

subject merchandise. Where an importer 

(or customer)-specific assessment rate is 

de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), 

the Department will instruct CBP to 

assess that importer (or customer’s) 

entries of subject merchandise without 

regard to antidumping duties, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

The Department intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of these 

final results of review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise from the PRC 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Stanley, 

Hongli, Jinchi, and the Separate Rate 

Applicants, the cash deposit rate will be 

their respective rates established in the 

final results of this review, except if the 

rate is zero or de minimis no cash 

deposit will be required; (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed PRC 

and non-PRC exporters not listed above 

that have separate rates, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) for all PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the PRC-wide rate of 118.04 percent; 

and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

PRC exporters that supplied that nonPRC exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this POR. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties has occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

administrative review and notice in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: February 23, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I—Issues and Decision 

Memorandum 

General Issues 

Comment 1: Zeroing 

Comment 2: Surrogate Financial Ratios 

Comment 3: Wire Rod Surrogate Value 

Comment 4: Cash Deposit and Liquidation 

Instructions 

Company-Specific Issues 

Stanley 

Comment 5: Application of Partial FA or 

Partial AFA 

Comment 6: Stanley’s Surrogate Values 

A. Copper Plated Steel Welding Wire 

B. Sodium Sulfate 

C. Glass Balls 

D. Plastic Film 

E. Plastic Strapping 

Comment 7: Foreign Inland Freight 

Hongli 

Comment 8: Application of Partial FA or 

Partial AFA 

Comment 9: Steel Plate Surrogate Value 

Comment 10: Shrink Wrap Surrogate Value 

Comment 11: Pallet Surrogate Value 

Jinchi 

Comment 12: Application of Partial FA or 

Partial AFA 

Comment 13: Saw Dust 

Comment 14: Sigma Cap Distances 

Gem-Chun 

Comment 15: No Shipments 

[FR Doc. 2012–4877 Filed 2–29–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Unit, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–4735. 

Background 

Each year during the anniversary 

month of the publication of an 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation, an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213, that the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct 

an administrative review of that 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

comments or actions by the Department 

discussed below refer to the number of 

calendar days from the applicable 

starting date. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event the Department limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, the 

Department intends to select 

respondents based on U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. 

imports during the period of review. We 

intend to release the CBP data under 

Administrative Protective Order 

(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO 

within five days of publication of the 

initiation notice and to make our 

decision regarding respondent selection 

within 21 days of publication of the 

initiation Federal Register notice. 

Therefore, we encourage all parties 

interested in commenting on respondent 

selection to submit their APO 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

12560 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2012 / Notices 

1Or the next business day, if the deadline falls 

on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day 

when the Department is closed. 

applications on the date of publication 

of the initiation notice, or as soon 

thereafter as possible. The Department 

invites comments regarding the CBP 

data and respondent selection within 

five days of placement of the CBP data 

on the record of the review. 

In the event the Department decides 

it is necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: 

In general, the Department has found 

that determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, the Department 

will not conduct collapsing analyses at 

the respondent selection phase of this 

review and will not collapse companies 

at the respondent selection phase unless 

there has been a determination to 

collapse certain companies in a 

previous segment of this antidumping 

proceeding (i.e., investigation, 

administrative review, new shipper 

review or changed circumstances 

review). For any company subject to this 

review, if the Department determined or 

continued to treat that company as 

collapsed with others, the Department 

will assume that such companies 

continue to operate in the same manner 

and will collapse them for respondent 

selection purposes. Otherwise, the 

Department will not-collapse companies 

for purposes of respondent selection. 

Parties are requested to (a) identify 

which companies subject to review 

previously were collapsed, and (b) 

provide a citation to the proceeding in 

which they were collapsed. Further, if 

companies are requested to complete 

the Quantity and Value Questionnaire 

for purposes of respondent selection, in 

general each company must report 

volume and value data separately for 

itself. Parties should not include data 

for any other party, even if they believe 

they should be treated as a single entity 

with that other party. If a company was 

collapsed with another company or 

companies in the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

where the Department considered 

collapsing that entity, complete quantity 

and value data for that collapsed entity 

must be submitted. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that has requested a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that the Department 

may extend this time if it is reasonable 

to do so. In order to provide parties 

additional certainty with respect to 

when the Department will exercise its 

discretion to extend this 90-day 

deadline, interested parties are advised 

that, with regard to reviews requested 

on the basis of anniversary months on 

or after March 2012, the Department 

does not intend to extend the 90-day 

deadline unless the requestor 

demonstrates that an extraordinary 

circumstance has prevented it from 

submitting a timely withdrawal request. 

Determinations by the Department to 

extend the 90-day deadline will be 

made on a case-by-case basis. 

The Department is providing this 

notice on its Web site, as well as in its 

‘‘Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review’’ notices, so that 

interested parties will be aware of the 

manner in which the Department 

intends to exercise its discretion in the 

future. 

Opportunity To Request a Review: Not 

later than the last day of March 2012,1

interested parties may request 

administrative review of the following 

orders, findings, or suspended 

investigations, with anniversary dates in 

March for the following periods: 

Period of review 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

Brazil: Orange Juice, A–351–840 .................................................................................................................................................. 3/1/11–2/29/12 

Canada: Iron Construction Castings, A–122–503 ......................................................................................................................... 3/1/11–2/29/12 

France: Brass Sheet & Strip, A–427–602 ..................................................................................................................................... 3/1/11–2/29/12 

Germany: Brass Sheet & Strip, A–428–602 ................................................................................................................................. 3/1/11–2/29/12 

India: Sulfanilic Acid, A–533–806 .................................................................................................................................................. 3/1/11–2/29/12 

Italy: Brass Sheet & Strip, A–475–601 .......................................................................................................................................... 3/1/11–2/29/12 

Russia: Silicon Metal, A–821–817 ................................................................................................................................................. 3/1/11–2/29/12 

Spain: Stainless Steel Bar, A–469–805 ........................................................................................................................................ 3/1/11–2/29/12 

Taiwan: 

Light-Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube, A–583–803 ...................................................................... 3/1/11–2/29/12 

Polyvinyl Alcohol, A–583–841 ................................................................................................................................................ 9/13/11–2/29/12 

Thailand: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipe & Tube, A–549–502 ............................................................................................. 3/1/11–2/29/12 

The People’s Republic of China: 

Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe, A–570–930 ......................................................................................... 3/1/11–2/29/12 

Chloropicrin, A–570–002 ........................................................................................................................................................ 3/1/11–2/29/12 

Drill Pipe2, A–570–965 ........................................................................................................................................................... 3/3/11–2/29/12 

Glycine, A–570–836 ............................................................................................................................................................... 3/1/11–2/29/12 

Sodium Hexametaphosphate, A–570–908 ............................................................................................................................. 3/1/11–2/29/12 

Tissue Paper Products, A–570–894 ...................................................................................................................................... 3/1/11–2/29/12 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

India: Sulfanilic Acid, C–533–807 .................................................................................................................................................. 1/1/11–12/31/11 

Iran: In-Shell Pistachios Nuts, C–507–501 ................................................................................................................................... 1/1/11–12/31/11 

The People’s Republic of China: 

Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe, C–570–931 ......................................................................................... 1/1/11–12/31/11 

Drill Pipe, C–570–966 ............................................................................................................................................................ 3/3/11–12/31/11 

Turkey: Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube, C–489–502 ......................................................................................................... 1/1/11–12/31/11 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2012 / Notices 12561 

2 In the notice of opportunity to request 

administrative reviews that published on February 

1, 2012 (77 FR 4990) the Department incorrectly 

listed Drill Pipe from the PRC in the month of 

February. This is the correct month of review for 

this case. 

3 If the review request involves a non-market 

economy and the parties subject to the review 

request do not qualify for separate rates, all other 

exporters of subject merchandise from the nonmarket economy country who do not have a 

separate rate will be covered by the review as part 

of the single entity of which the named firms are 

a part. 

Suspension Agreements 

None. 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), an interested party as 

defined by section 771(9) of the Act may 

request in writing that the Secretary 

conduct an administrative review. For 

both antidumping and countervailing 

duty reviews, the interested party must 

specify the individual producers or 

exporters covered by an antidumping 

finding or an antidumping or 

countervailing duty order or suspension 

agreement for which it is requesting a 

review. In addition, a domestic 

interested party or an interested party 

described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act 

must state why it desires the Secretary 

to review those particular producers or 

exporters.3 If the interested party 

intends for the Secretary to review sales 

of merchandise by an exporter (or a 

producer if that producer also exports 

merchandise from other suppliers) 

which were produced in more than one 

country of origin and each country of 

origin is subject to a separate order, then 

the interested party must state 

specifically, on an order-by-order basis, 

which exporter(s) the request is 

intended to cover. 

Please note that, for any party the 

Department was unable to locate in 

prior segments, the Department will not 

accept a request for an administrative 

review of that party absent new 

information as to the party’s location. 

Moreover, if the interested party who 

files a request for review is unable to 

locate the producer or exporter for 

which it requested the review, the 

interested party must provide an 

explanation of the attempts it made to 

locate the producer or exporter at the 

same time it files its request for review, 

in order for the Secretary to determine 

if the interested party’s attempts were 

reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(3)(ii). 

As explained in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), the Department 

has clarified its practice with respect to 

the collection of final antidumping 

duties on imports of merchandise where 

intermediate firms are involved. The 

public should be aware of this 

clarification in determining whether to 

request an administrative review of 

merchandise subject to antidumping 

findings and orders. See also the Import 

Administration web site at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov. 

All requests must be filed 

electronically in Import 

Administration’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (‘‘IA 

ACCESS’’) on the IA ACCESS Web site 

at http://iaaccess.trade.gov. See 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing 

Procedures; Administrative Protective 

Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 

2011). Further, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each 

request must be served on the petitioner 

and each exporter or producer specified 

in the request. 

The Department will publish in the 

Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation 

of Administrative Review of 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation’’ for requests received by 

the last day of March 2012. If the 

Department does not receive, by the last 

day of March 2012, a request for review 

of entries covered by an order, finding, 

or suspended investigation listed in this 

notice and for the period identified 

above, the Department will instruct CBP 

to assess antidumping or countervailing 

duties on those entries at a rate equal to 

the cash deposit of (or bond for) 

estimated antidumping or 

countervailing duties required on those 

entries at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption and to continue to collect 

the cash deposit previously ordered. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the period of review. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: February 15, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–5015 Filed 2–29–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Advance Notification of 

Sunset Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

Background 

Every five years, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the 

International Trade Commission 

automatically initiate and conduct a 

review to determine whether revocation 

of a countervailing or antidumping duty 

order or termination of an investigation 

suspended under section 704 or 734 of 

the Act would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

or a countervailable subsidy (as the case 

may be) and of material injury. 

Upcoming Sunset Reviews for April 

2012 

The following Sunset Reviews are 

scheduled for initiation in April 2012 

and will appear in that month’s Notice 

of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset 

Reviews. 

Antidumping duty proceedings Department contact 

Folding Gift Boxes From the People’s Republic of China (A–570–866) (2nd Review) ............................... Jennifer Moats (202) 482–5047. 

Seamless Pipe and Pressure Pipe From Germany (A–428–820) (3rd Review) ......................................... Dana Mermelstein (202) 482–1391. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES