# L_2006355EN.01009601.xml

| 15.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 355/96 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 355/96

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 14 December 2006

excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF)

(notified under document number C(2006) 5993)

(Only the Spanish, German, Greek, French, Dutch, Portuguese, Finnish and Swedish texts are authentic)

(2006/932/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 of 21 April 1970 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (1), and in particular Article 5(2)(c) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (2), and in particular Article 7(4) thereof,

Having consulted the Fund Committee,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70, Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Article 8(1) and (2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 of 7 July 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 regarding the procedure for the clearance of the accounts of the EAGGF Guarantee Section (3) provide that the Commission is to make the necessary verifications, inform the Member States of its findings, take account of the Member States' comments, initiate bilateral discussions with a view to reaching agreement with the Member States concerned and then formally communicate its conclusions to them, referring to Commission Decision 94/442/EC of 1 July 1994 setting up a conciliation procedure in the context of the clearance of the accounts of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) Guarantee Section (4). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70, Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Article 8(1) and (2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 of 7 July 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 regarding the procedure for the clearance of the accounts of the EAGGF Guarantee Section (3) provide that the Commission is to make the necessary verifications, inform the Member States of its findings, take account of the Member States' comments, initiate bilateral discussions with a view to reaching agreement with the Member States concerned and then formally communicate its conclusions to them, referring to Commission Decision 94/442/EC of 1 July 1994 setting up a conciliation procedure in the context of the clearance of the accounts of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) Guarantee Section (4).

| (2) | The Member States have had an opportunity to request that a conciliation procedure be initiated. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the report issued on the outcome has been examined by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Member States have had an opportunity to request that a conciliation procedure be initiated. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the report issued on the outcome has been examined by the Commission.

| (3) | Under Articles 2 and 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 and Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999, only refunds on exports to third countries and intervention to stabilise agricultural markets, granted and undertaken respectively according to Community rules within the framework of the common organisation of the agricultural markets, may be financed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Under Articles 2 and 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 and Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999, only refunds on exports to third countries and intervention to stabilise agricultural markets, granted and undertaken respectively according to Community rules within the framework of the common organisation of the agricultural markets, may be financed.

| (4) | In the light of the checks carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil these requirements and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGGF Guarantee Section. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In the light of the checks carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil these requirements and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGGF Guarantee Section.

| (5) | The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than 24 months before the Commission's written notification of the results of the checks to the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than 24 months before the Commission's written notification of the results of the checks to the Member States.

| (6) | As regards the cases covered by this Decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with Community rules was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

As regards the cases covered by this Decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with Community rules was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject.

| (7) | This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 15 October 2006 and relating to its content, |
| --- | --- |

(7)

This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 15 October 2006 and relating to its content,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The expenditure itemised in the Annex hereto that has been incurred by the Member States' accredited paying agencies and declared under the EAGGF Guarantee Section shall be excluded from Community financing because it does not comply with Community rules.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Portuguese Republic and the Republic of Finland.

Done at Brussels, 14 December 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 94, 28.4.1970, p. 13. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1287/95 (OJ L 125, 8.6.1995, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 103.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 158, 8.7.1995, p. 6. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 465/2005 (OJ L 77, 23.3.2005, p. 6).

3

(4)  
  OJ L 182, 16.7.1994, p. 45. Decision as last amended by Decision 2001/535/EC (OJ L 193, 17.7.2001, p. 25).

4

---

ANNEX

Total corrections — Budget item 6701

| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions already made | Financial impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DE | Financial audit — Late payments | 2004 | Failure to meet payment deadlines | one-off | | EUR | – 150 191,69 | – 150 191,69 | 0,00 |
| DE | Financial audit — Clearance of accounts | 2002 | Clearance of EAGGF Guarantee accounts for financial year 2002 | one-off | | EUR | – 861 269,60 | 0,00 | – 861 269,60 |
| DE | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2003 | Overshooting of the financial ceilings | one-off | | EUR | –3 963,37 | 0,00 | –3 963,37 |
| Total DE | | | | | | –1 015 424,66 | – 150 191,69 | – 865 232,97 |
| ES | Fruit and Veg's — Fig & Prune Processing | 2003 | Failure to meet payment deadlines | one-off | | EUR | – 153 697,96 | 0,00 | – 153 697,96 |
| ES | Fruit and Veg's — Peach & Pear Processing | 2003 | Failure to meet payment deadlines | one-off | | EUR | – 671 734,80 | 0,00 | – 671 734,80 |
| ES | Fruit and Veg's — Tomato Processing | 2003 | Failure to meet payment deadlines | one-off | | EUR | – 131 420,25 | 0,00 | – 131 420,25 |
| ES | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2001 | Control does not cover the final use of distributed product | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | –33 757,94 | 0,00 | –33 757,94 |
| ES | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2001 | Failure to meet environmental conditions | one-off | | EUR | –2 858 447,88 | 0,00 | –2 858 447,88 |
| ES | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2001 | Unsatisfactory quality of controls carried out on withdrawn product | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | –19 254,89 | 0,00 | –19 254,89 |
| ES | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2002 | Control does not cover the final use of distributed product | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | –29 729,38 | 0,00 | –29 729,38 |
| ES | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2002 | Failure to meet environmental conditions | one-off | | EUR | –4 357 238,89 | 0,00 | –4 357 238,89 |
| ES | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2002 | Unsatisfactory quality of controls carried out on withdrawn product | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | – 206 215,94 | 0,00 | – 206 215,94 |
| ES | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2003 | Control does not cover the final use of distributed product | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | –37 920,18 | 0,00 | –37 920,18 |
| ES | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2003 | Failure to meet environmental conditions | one-off | | EUR | –3 679 878,76 | 0,00 | –3 679 878,76 |
| ES | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2003 | Unsatisfactory quality of controls carried out on withdrawn product | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | –82 025,34 | 0,00 | –82 025,34 |
| Total ES | | | | | | –12 261 322,21 | 0,00 | –12 261 322,21 |
| FI | Arable Crops | 2003 | Undue application of a tolerance for administrative cross-checks, shortcoming in controls on eligibility criteria | one-off | | EUR | – 132 222,76 | 0,00 | – 132 222,76 |
| FI | Arable Crops | 2004 | Undue application of a tolerance for administrative cross-checks, shortcoming in controls on eligibility criteria | one-off | | EUR | – 146 393,43 | 0,00 | – 146 393,43 |
| FI | Arable Crops | 2005 | Undue application of a tolerance for administrative cross-checks, shortcoming in controls on eligibility criteria | one-off | | EUR | – 131 999,21 | 0,00 | – 131 999,21 |
| FI | Butterfats in Food Processing | 2002 | Reimbursement following erroneous calculation of financial correction (Commission Decision 2006/334/EC) | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | 15 073,27 | 0,00 | 15 073,27 |
| Total FI | | | | | | – 395 542,13 | 0,00 | – 395 542,13 |
| FR | Financial audit — Late payments | 2004 | Failure to meet payment deadlines | one-off | | EUR | –9 219 078,83 | –9 219 078,83 | 0,00 |
| FR | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2003 | Overshooting of the financial ceilings | one-off | | EUR | –27 441,60 | –27 441,60 | 0,00 |
| FR | Fruit and Veg's — Fig & Prune Processing | 2003 | Weaknesses in controls on producer organisations and processors | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | –1 631 436,97 | 0,00 | –1 631 436,97 |
| FR | Fruit and Veg's — Fig & Prune Processing | 2004 | Weaknesses in controls on producer organisations and processors | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | –2 363 125,84 | 0,00 | –2 363 125,84 |
| FR | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2002 | Weaknesses in quality controls | flat-rate | 10  % | EUR | – 553 591,97 | 0,00 | – 553 591,97 |
| FR | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2002 | Non-eligible payments | one-off | | EUR | – 390 167,12 | 0,00 | – 390 167,12 |
| FR | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2003 | Weaknesses in quality controls | flat-rate | 10  % | EUR | – 467 514,07 | 0,00 | – 467 514,07 |
| FR | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2003 | Non-eligible payments | one-off | | EUR | – 329 251,70 | 0,00 | – 329 251,70 |
| FR | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2004 | Weaknesses in quality controls | flat-rate | 10  % | EUR | –73 418,08 | 0,00 | –73 418,08 |
| FR | Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals | 2004 | Non-eligible payments | one-off | | EUR | –51 662,44 | 0,00 | –51 662,44 |
| Total FR | | | | | | –15 106 688,62 | –9 246 520,43 | –5 860 168,19 |
| GR | Cotton | 1999 | Shortcomings in controls of areas sown and failure to ensure compatibility with IACS | flat-rate | 2  % | EUR | –13 809 328,47 | 0,00 | –13 809 328,47 |
| GR | Cotton | 2000 | Shortcomings in controls of areas sown and failure to ensure compatibility with IACS | flat-rate | 2  % | EUR | –12 772 949,94 | 0,00 | –12 772 949,94 |
| GR | Cotton | 2001 | Shortcomings in controls of areas sown and failure to ensure compatibility with IACS | flat-rate | 2  % | EUR | –10 861 691,99 | 0,00 | –10 861 691,99 |
| GR | Cotton | 2002 | Shortcomings in controls of areas sown and failure to ensure compatibility with IACS | flat-rate | 2  % | EUR | –9 386,27 | 0,00 | –9 386,27 |
| GR | Financial audit — Late payments | 2003 | Failure to meet payment deadlines | one-off | | EUR | –8 585 958,60 | –11 332 816,07 | 2 746 857,47 |
| GR | Fruit and Veg's — Processed dried grape products (other measures) | 2000 | Overestimated area, lack of geographical location for parcel identification, unsatisfactory control of harvested grape destination | flat-rate | 10  % | EUR | –10 463 301,27 | 0,00 | –10 463 301,27 |
| GR | Fruit and Veg's — Processed dried grape products (other measures) | 2001 | Overestimated area, lack of geographical location for parcel identification, unsatisfactory control of harvested grape destination | flat-rate | 10  % | EUR | –10 211 803,93 | 0,00 | –10 211 803,93 |
| GR | Fruit and Veg's — Processed dried grape products (other measures) | 2002 | Overestimated area, lack of geographical location for parcel identification, unsatisfactory control of harvested grape destination | flat-rate | 10  % | EUR | –10 238 190,17 | 0,00 | –10 238 190,17 |
| GR | Fruit and Veg's — Citrus Processing | 2002 | Weaknesses in accounting controls on producer organisations and processors | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | –1 600 595,97 | 0,00 | –1 600 595,97 |
| GR | Fruit and Veg's — Citrus Processing | 2003 | Weaknesses in accounting controls on producer organisations and processors | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | –1 901 064,33 | 0,00 | –1 901 064,33 |
| GR | Fruit and Veg's — Citrus Processing | 2004 | Weaknesses in accounting controls on producer organisations and processors | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | –66 532,29 | 0,00 | –66 532,29 |
| GR | Olive Oil — Production aid | 2001 | Computer files are not operational, crop declarations controls are ineffective | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | –3 149 196,05 | 0,00 | –3 149 196,05 |
| GR | Olive Oil — Production aid | 2001 | Computer files are not operational, crop declarations controls are ineffective | flat-rate | 10  % | EUR | –51 690 441,26 | 0,00 | –51 690 441,26 |
| GR | Olive Oil — Production aid | 2002 | Computer files are not operational, crop declarations controls are ineffective | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | 777,64 | 0,00 | 777,64 |
| GR | Olive Oil — Production aid | 2002 | Computer files are not operational, crop declarations controls are ineffective | flat-rate | 10  % | EUR | –55 525 481,37 | 0,00 | –55 525 481,37 |
| GR | Olive Oil — Production aid | 2003 | Computer files are not operational, crop declarations controls are ineffective | flat-rate | 10  % | EUR | –52 364 617,95 | 0,00 | –52 364 617,95 |
| GR | Olive Oil — Production aid | 2004 | Computer files are not operational, crop declarations controls are ineffective | flat-rate | 10  % | EUR | – 979 495,25 | 0,00 | – 979 495,25 |
| Total GR | | | | | | – 244 229 257,47 | –11 332 816,07 | – 232 896 441,40 |
| LU | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2003 | Overshooting of the financial ceilings | one-off | | EUR | –42 350,66 | –42 350,66 | 0,00 |
| Total LU | | | | | | –42 350,66 | –42 350,66 | 0,00 |
| NL | Financial audit — Late payments | 2004 | Failure to meet payment deadlines | one-off | | EUR | – 313 633,90 | – 313 633,90 | 0,00 |
| NL | RD Guarantee new measures | 2002 | Ineligible expenditure claimed under the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF | one-off | | EUR | –5 670 000,00 | 0,00 | –5 670 000,00 |
| NL | RD Guarantee new measures | 2003 | Expenditure approved under the Guidance Section, but claimed under the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF | one-off | | EUR | – 578 520,00 | 0,00 | – 578 520,00 |
| NL | RD Guarantee new measures | 2004 | Expenditure approved under the Guidance Section, but claimed under the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF | one-off | | EUR | – 444 629,00 | –5 599,00 | – 439 030,00 |
| Total NL | | | | | | –7 006 782,90 | – 319 232,90 | –6 687 550,00 |
| PT | Arable Crops | 2003 | Inadequate verification of the eligibility of claims paid for durum wheat | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | –1 962 129,00 | 0,00 | –1 962 129,00 |
| PT | Arable Crops | 2004 | Inadequate verification of the eligibility of claims paid for durum wheat | flat-rate | 5  % | EUR | –1 983 698,00 | 0,00 | –1 983 698,00 |
| PT | Financial audit — Late payments | 2004 | Failure to meet payment deadlines | one-off | | EUR | – 855 539,34 | – 884 529,11 | 28 989,77 |
| PT | Fruit and Veg's — Operational Funds | 2003 | Failure to meet deadlines | one-off | | EUR | – 293,03 | 0,00 | – 293,03 |
| PT | Fruit and Veg's — Peach & Pear Processing | 2003 | Failure to meet payment deadlines | one-off | | EUR | –2 541,18 | 0,00 | –2 541,18 |
| PT | Fruit and Veg's — Tomato Processing | 2003 | Failure to meet payment deadlines | one-off | | EUR | – 582 983,67 | 0,00 | – 582 983,67 |
| Total PT | | | | | | –5 387 184,22 | – 884 529,11 | –4 502 655,11 |

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

%

Currency

Amount

Deductions already made

Financial impact

DE

Financial audit — Late payments

2004

Failure to meet payment deadlines

one-off

EUR

– 150 191,69

– 150 191,69

0,00

DE

Financial audit — Clearance of accounts

2002

Clearance of EAGGF Guarantee accounts for financial year 2002

one-off

EUR

– 861 269,60

0,00

– 861 269,60

DE

Financial audit — Overshooting

2003

Overshooting of the financial ceilings

one-off

EUR

–3 963,37

0,00

–3 963,37

Total DE

–1 015 424,66

– 150 191,69

– 865 232,97

ES

Fruit and Veg's — Fig & Prune Processing

2003

Failure to meet payment deadlines

one-off

EUR

– 153 697,96

0,00

– 153 697,96

ES

Fruit and Veg's — Peach & Pear Processing

2003

Failure to meet payment deadlines

one-off

EUR

– 671 734,80

0,00

– 671 734,80

ES

Fruit and Veg's — Tomato Processing

2003

Failure to meet payment deadlines

one-off

EUR

– 131 420,25

0,00

– 131 420,25

ES

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2001

Control does not cover the final use of distributed product

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

–33 757,94

0,00

–33 757,94

ES

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2001

Failure to meet environmental conditions

one-off

EUR

–2 858 447,88

0,00

–2 858 447,88

ES

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2001

Unsatisfactory quality of controls carried out on withdrawn product

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

–19 254,89

0,00

–19 254,89

ES

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2002

Control does not cover the final use of distributed product

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

–29 729,38

0,00

–29 729,38

ES

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2002

Failure to meet environmental conditions

one-off

EUR

–4 357 238,89

0,00

–4 357 238,89

ES

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2002

Unsatisfactory quality of controls carried out on withdrawn product

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

– 206 215,94

0,00

– 206 215,94

ES

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2003

Control does not cover the final use of distributed product

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

–37 920,18

0,00

–37 920,18

ES

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2003

Failure to meet environmental conditions

one-off

EUR

–3 679 878,76

0,00

–3 679 878,76

ES

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2003

Unsatisfactory quality of controls carried out on withdrawn product

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

–82 025,34

0,00

–82 025,34

Total ES

–12 261 322,21

0,00

–12 261 322,21

FI

Arable Crops

2003

Undue application of a tolerance for administrative cross-checks, shortcoming in controls on eligibility criteria

one-off

EUR

– 132 222,76

0,00

– 132 222,76

FI

Arable Crops

2004

Undue application of a tolerance for administrative cross-checks, shortcoming in controls on eligibility criteria

one-off

EUR

– 146 393,43

0,00

– 146 393,43

FI

Arable Crops

2005

Undue application of a tolerance for administrative cross-checks, shortcoming in controls on eligibility criteria

one-off

EUR

– 131 999,21

0,00

– 131 999,21

FI

Butterfats in Food Processing

2002

Reimbursement following erroneous calculation of financial correction (Commission Decision 2006/334/EC)

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

15 073,27

0,00

15 073,27

Total FI

– 395 542,13

0,00

– 395 542,13

FR

Financial audit — Late payments

2004

Failure to meet payment deadlines

one-off

EUR

–9 219 078,83

–9 219 078,83

0,00

FR

Financial audit — Overshooting

2003

Overshooting of the financial ceilings

one-off

EUR

–27 441,60

–27 441,60

0,00

FR

Fruit and Veg's — Fig & Prune Processing

2003

Weaknesses in controls on producer organisations and processors

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

–1 631 436,97

0,00

–1 631 436,97

FR

Fruit and Veg's — Fig & Prune Processing

2004

Weaknesses in controls on producer organisations and processors

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

–2 363 125,84

0,00

–2 363 125,84

FR

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2002

Weaknesses in quality controls

flat-rate

10  %

EUR

– 553 591,97

0,00

– 553 591,97

FR

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2002

Non-eligible payments

one-off

EUR

– 390 167,12

0,00

– 390 167,12

FR

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2003

Weaknesses in quality controls

flat-rate

10  %

EUR

– 467 514,07

0,00

– 467 514,07

FR

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2003

Non-eligible payments

one-off

EUR

– 329 251,70

0,00

– 329 251,70

FR

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2004

Weaknesses in quality controls

flat-rate

10  %

EUR

–73 418,08

0,00

–73 418,08

FR

Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals

2004

Non-eligible payments

one-off

EUR

–51 662,44

0,00

–51 662,44

Total FR

–15 106 688,62

–9 246 520,43

–5 860 168,19

GR

Cotton

1999

Shortcomings in controls of areas sown and failure to ensure compatibility with IACS

flat-rate

2  %

EUR

–13 809 328,47

0,00

–13 809 328,47

GR

Cotton

2000

Shortcomings in controls of areas sown and failure to ensure compatibility with IACS

flat-rate

2  %

EUR

–12 772 949,94

0,00

–12 772 949,94

GR

Cotton

2001

Shortcomings in controls of areas sown and failure to ensure compatibility with IACS

flat-rate

2  %

EUR

–10 861 691,99

0,00

–10 861 691,99

GR

Cotton

2002

Shortcomings in controls of areas sown and failure to ensure compatibility with IACS

flat-rate

2  %

EUR

–9 386,27

0,00

–9 386,27

GR

Financial audit — Late payments

2003

Failure to meet payment deadlines

one-off

EUR

–8 585 958,60

–11 332 816,07

2 746 857,47

GR

Fruit and Veg's — Processed dried grape products (other measures)

2000

Overestimated area, lack of geographical location for parcel identification, unsatisfactory control of harvested grape destination

flat-rate

10  %

EUR

–10 463 301,27

0,00

–10 463 301,27

GR

Fruit and Veg's — Processed dried grape products (other measures)

2001

Overestimated area, lack of geographical location for parcel identification, unsatisfactory control of harvested grape destination

flat-rate

10  %

EUR

–10 211 803,93

0,00

–10 211 803,93

GR

Fruit and Veg's — Processed dried grape products (other measures)

2002

Overestimated area, lack of geographical location for parcel identification, unsatisfactory control of harvested grape destination

flat-rate

10  %

EUR

–10 238 190,17

0,00

–10 238 190,17

GR

Fruit and Veg's — Citrus Processing

2002

Weaknesses in accounting controls on producer organisations and processors

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

–1 600 595,97

0,00

–1 600 595,97

GR

Fruit and Veg's — Citrus Processing

2003

Weaknesses in accounting controls on producer organisations and processors

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

–1 901 064,33

0,00

–1 901 064,33

GR

Fruit and Veg's — Citrus Processing

2004

Weaknesses in accounting controls on producer organisations and processors

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

–66 532,29

0,00

–66 532,29

GR

Olive Oil — Production aid

2001

Computer files are not operational, crop declarations controls are ineffective

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

–3 149 196,05

0,00

–3 149 196,05

GR

Olive Oil — Production aid

2001

Computer files are not operational, crop declarations controls are ineffective

flat-rate

10  %

EUR

–51 690 441,26

0,00

–51 690 441,26

GR

Olive Oil — Production aid

2002

Computer files are not operational, crop declarations controls are ineffective

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

777,64

0,00

777,64

GR

Olive Oil — Production aid

2002

Computer files are not operational, crop declarations controls are ineffective

flat-rate

10  %

EUR

–55 525 481,37

0,00

–55 525 481,37

GR

Olive Oil — Production aid

2003

Computer files are not operational, crop declarations controls are ineffective

flat-rate

10  %

EUR

–52 364 617,95

0,00

–52 364 617,95

GR

Olive Oil — Production aid

2004

Computer files are not operational, crop declarations controls are ineffective

flat-rate

10  %

EUR

– 979 495,25

0,00

– 979 495,25

Total GR

– 244 229 257,47

–11 332 816,07

– 232 896 441,40

LU

Financial audit — Overshooting

2003

Overshooting of the financial ceilings

one-off

EUR

–42 350,66

–42 350,66

0,00

Total LU

–42 350,66

–42 350,66

0,00

NL

Financial audit — Late payments

2004

Failure to meet payment deadlines

one-off

EUR

– 313 633,90

– 313 633,90

0,00

NL

RD Guarantee new measures

2002

Ineligible expenditure claimed under the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF

one-off

EUR

–5 670 000,00

0,00

–5 670 000,00

NL

RD Guarantee new measures

2003

Expenditure approved under the Guidance Section, but claimed under the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF

one-off

EUR

– 578 520,00

0,00

– 578 520,00

NL

RD Guarantee new measures

2004

Expenditure approved under the Guidance Section, but claimed under the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF

one-off

EUR

– 444 629,00

–5 599,00

– 439 030,00

Total NL

–7 006 782,90

– 319 232,90

–6 687 550,00

PT

Arable Crops

2003

Inadequate verification of the eligibility of claims paid for durum wheat

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

–1 962 129,00

0,00

–1 962 129,00

PT

Arable Crops

2004

Inadequate verification of the eligibility of claims paid for durum wheat

flat-rate

5  %

EUR

–1 983 698,00

0,00

–1 983 698,00

PT

Financial audit — Late payments

2004

Failure to meet payment deadlines

one-off

EUR

– 855 539,34

– 884 529,11

28 989,77

PT

Fruit and Veg's — Operational Funds

2003

Failure to meet deadlines

one-off

EUR

– 293,03

0,00

– 293,03

PT

Fruit and Veg's — Peach & Pear Processing

2003

Failure to meet payment deadlines

one-off

EUR

–2 541,18

0,00

–2 541,18

PT

Fruit and Veg's — Tomato Processing

2003

Failure to meet payment deadlines

one-off

EUR

– 582 983,67

0,00

– 582 983,67

Total PT

–5 387 184,22

– 884 529,11

–4 502 655,11

---