alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex-10_1.htm










Santaro Interactive Entertainment Company S-1/A


 


Exhibit 10.1


 



TECHNOLOGY ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT







This agreement (the “Agreement”) is made this 5th day of February, 2010, between Aaron J. Berryman (“Assignor”), and Santaro Interactive Entertainment Company (“Assignee”) (Assignee and Assignor each a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”).







WHEREAS, Assignor has proprietary technology for the following invention:  Character Adapted Gaming Platform (the “Invention”):







WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that Assignor shall assign all right and title to the Invention to the Assignee for the sum of $5,000.







NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration as set forth below, the sum, sufficiency and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:








	
  

	
1.

	
Assignment.  Assignor hereby irrevocably assigns to Assignee all right, title and interest in the Invention, in exchange for the sum of $5,000, and Assignee hereby accepts such assignment.








	
  

	
2.

	
Intellectual Property.  The Assignor shall cooperate with the Assignee with regard to the filing of a patent application for the Invention, or such other intellectual property protection, as Assignee shall, in its sole discretion, deem appropriate.  However, Assignor shall have no right, title, or interest in such patent application or other intellectual property protection.








	
  

	
3.

	
Amendments or Waiver.  This Agreement may be changed, waived, discharged or terminated only by a writing signed by all Parties hereto.  No delay or omission by any party in exercising any right with respect hereto shall operate as waiver.  A waiver on any one occasion shall not be construed as a bar to, or waiver of, any right or remedy on any future occasion.








	
  

	
4.

	
Severability.  To the extent any provision of this Agreement is prohibited by or invalid under applicable law, such provision shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition, or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of such provision or the remaining provisions of this Agreement.








	
  

	
5.

	
Governing Law.  This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Virginia without giving effect to the conflict of laws principles thereof.








	
  

	
6.

	
Entire Agreement.  This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties relating to the subject matter herein.








	
  

	
7.

	
Binding Effect.  All of the terms of this Agreement, as amended from time to time, shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the respective heirs, successors and assigns of the Parties.












IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned agree to the terms of this Agreement as of the date first written above:








	
ASSIGNEE

	  	
ASSIGNOR


	  	  	  
	

/s/ James D. Edsall



	  	

/s/ Aaron J. Berryman




	


Santaro Interactive Entertainment Company


James D. Edsall, President and Director

	  	
Aaron J. Berryman
Presidential Documents

12721 

Federal Register 

Vol. 77, No. 42 

Friday, March 2, 2012 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of February 27, 2012 

Delegation of Reporting Function Specified In Section 1043 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2012 

Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense [and] the Secretary of Energy 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3 of 

the United States Code, I hereby delegate to you the reporting function 

conferred upon the President by section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81). 

The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, February 27, 2012 

[FR Doc. 2012–5270 

Filed 3–1–12; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 5000–04–P 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULESOB#1.EPS</GPH>
10-Q Exhibit 32.2: Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the iShares® GSCI® Commodity-Indexed Trust (the Trust) and iShares® GSCI® Commodity-Indexed Investing Pool LLC (the Investing Pool) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Latham, Chief Financial Officer of Barclays Global Investors International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust and
Manager of the Investing Pool, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust and Investing Pool.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006      
|                             
|/s/ Michael A. Latham        
|Michael A. Latham *          
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal financial officer)

---

|* | The Registrant is a trust and Co-Registrant is a limited liability company and Mr. Latham is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors International,
Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant and Manager of the Co-Registrant.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Each director and/or officer of CheckFree Corporation (the "Corporation")
whose signature appears below hereby appoints Peter J. Kight, Peter F.
Sinisgalli, and Curtis A. Loveland as the undersigned's attorneys or any of them
individually as the undersigned's attorney, to sign, in the undersigned's name
and behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2002, and likewise to sign and file with the Commission any and
all amendments to the Form 10-K, and the Corporation hereby also appoints such
persons as its attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its attorney-in-fact with
like authority to sign and file the Form 10-K and any amendments thereto
granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and
revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such attorney-in-fact or the
undersigned's substitute may do by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 8th day of August,
2002.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Signature                                          Title

<S>                                               <C>
     /s/ Peter J. Kight                            Chairman of the Board of Directors and
--------------------------------------             Chief Executive Officer
     Peter J. Kight                                (Principal Executive Officer)


      /s/ David E. Mangum                          Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
--------------------------------------             Officer
     David E. Mangum                               (Principal Financial Officer)


      /s/ Joseph P. McDonnell                      Vice President, Controller, and
--------------------------------------             Chief Accounting Officer
      Joseph P. McDonnell                          (Principal Accounting Officer)


      /s/ William P. Boardman                      Director
--------------------------------------
     William P. Boardman


      /s/ James D. Dixon                           Director
--------------------------------------
     James D. Dixon


      /s/ Henry C. Duques                          Director
--------------------------------------
     Henry C. Duques


      /s/ Mark A. Johnson                          Director
--------------------------------------
     Mark A. Johnson


      /s/ Lewis C. Levin                           Director
--------------------------------------
     Lewis C. Levin


      /s/ Eugene F. Quinn                          Director
--------------------------------------
     Eugene F. Quinn

      /s/ Jeffrey M. Wilkins                       Director
--------------------------------------
     Jeffrey M. Wilkins

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel Integrated Preclinical/Clinical Program for HIV Topical Microbicides.                    

*Date:*                         April 2-3, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Washington/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ellen S. Buczko, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2676,                         *ebuczko1@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 28, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-5291 Filed 3-2-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# L_2006130EN.01000501.xml

| 18.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 130/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 130/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 740/2006

of 17 May 2006

amending Regulation (EC) No 1063/2005 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the export of common wheat held by the Czech intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1063/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the export of 395 911 tonnes of common wheat held by the Czech intervention agency. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1063/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the export of 395 911 tonnes of common wheat held by the Czech intervention agency.

| (2) | The Czech Republic has informed the Commission of its intervention agency’s intention to increase by 117 358 tonnes the quantity put out to tender for export. In view of the quantities available and the market situation, the request made by the Czech Republic should be granted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Czech Republic has informed the Commission of its intervention agency’s intention to increase by 117 358 tonnes the quantity put out to tender for export. In view of the quantities available and the market situation, the request made by the Czech Republic should be granted.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 1063/2005 should therefore be amended. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 1063/2005 should therefore be amended.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1063/2005 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 2

The invitation to tender shall cover a maximum of 513 269 tonnes of common wheat for export to third countries with the exception of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Liechtenstein, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro (*1) and Switzerland.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 May 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 36. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 470/2006 (OJ L 84, 23.3.2006, p. 3).

2

---
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Jaguar Acquisition Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the “Report”), as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James
      S. Cassano, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
              /s/ James S. Cassano
            
            
            Dated:
              November
              __, 2007James
              S. CassanoChief
              Financial
              Officer
              (Principal
                Accounting and Financial Officer)
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 191 

To amend the Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Act of 2000 

to explain the purpose and provide for the administration of the Baca 

National Wildlife Refuge. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 8, 2009 

Mr. SALAZAR (for himself and Mr. UDALL of Colorado) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Act of 2000 to explain the purpose and provide 

for the administration of the Baca National Wildlife Refuge. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND MANAGEMENT OF THE BACA NA4 TIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE. 

5 Section 6 of the Great Sand Dunes National Park 

6 and Preserve Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 410hhh–4) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a)— 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 191 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.— 

2 (1) When’’ and inserting the following: 

3 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE.— 

4 ‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.— 

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—When’’; 

6 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘(2) 

7 Such establishment’’ and inserting the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(B) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The establish10 ment of the refuge under subparagraph (A)’’; 

11 and 

12 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Baca Na14 tional Wildlife Refuge shall be to restore, enhance, 

15 and maintain wetland, upland, riparian, and other 

16 habitats for native wildlife, plant, and fish species in 

17 the San Luis Valley.’’; 

18 (2) in subsection (c)— 

19 (A) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and in20 serting the following: 

21 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary’’; and 

22 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

23 ‘‘(2) REQUIREMENTS.—In administering the 

24 Baca National Wildlife Refuge, the Secretary shall, 

25 to the maximum extent practicable— 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 191 IS

1 ‘‘(A) emphasize migratory bird conserva2 tion; and 

3 ‘‘(B) take into consideration the role of the 

4 Refuge in broader landscape conservation ef5 forts.’’; and 

6 (3) in subsection (d)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

8 the end; 

9 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking the pe10 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(3) subject to any agreement in existence as of 

13 the date of enactment of this paragraph, and to the 

14 extent consistent with the purposes of the Refuge, 

15 use decreed water rights on the Refuge in approxi16 mately the same manner that the water rights have 

17 been used historically.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Cold Spring Capital Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
      A. Stratton, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Dated:
      November 15, 2006






/s/
                Richard A. StrattonRichard
                A. Stratton
              Chief
                Executive Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 6 0 031 Summary Calendar

JACQUELYN JOHNSON , Plaintiff

− Appell ant,

v ersus
HUNTINGTON INGA LLS, INCORPORATED,

Defendant

− Appell ee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the S o u thern District of Missi ssippi No. 1:1 6

- C V

- 304

Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Jacquelyn Johnson sued her employer, Huntington Ingalls, Incorpor ated (“HII”) , under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, alleging primarily that she had

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 25, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-60031 Document: 00514849962 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/25/2019No. 18

- 6 0 031

2 been disciplined and harassed because of her race (black) and her sex and that those actions resulted from a complai nt she had made about not receiving a bonus. Johnson further contended that she had been transferred as punish

ment for a complaint regarding safety suggestions. She also a verred that male employees were allowed to become instructors in the train ing sch ool without
hav ing the welding experience she had been told she must have to be an
instructor. After discovery, H II moved for summary judgment on the ground that
the Title VII claims were time

- barred and that the evidence did not support Johnson’s claims under Title VII or § 1981. Johnson conceded that the
Title VII claims were time

- barred and that she was pursuing only her § 1981 theories.

In a careful Memorand um Opinion and Order entered December 12, 2017, the district court agreed that the Title VII claims were tardy. On John

son’s assertion that she should not have been denied leaderman pay, the court observed that Johnson had proffered no evidence that she was treated less favorably than those outside her protected class. The court also noted that the denial was because of inability or failure to perform and that there was no evidence of pretext. Regarding retaliation, the court stated that the evidence
sh owed no causal connection between any protected activity and the alleged
adverse actio n of transferring Johnson from the train ing center.
Johnson appeals pro se . There is no error. The summary judgment, dis

miss ing all claims, is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons convincingly explained by the district court. HII moves for reconsideration of the Clerk’s order granting Johnson’s motion to supplement the record. The motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. On reconsideration, the motion to supplement
is DENIED. Case: 18-60031 Document: 00514849962 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/25/2019