alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20987

Conference Calendar

 

HOWARD RICH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TOMMY B. THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CV-3178

- - - - - - - - - -

June 14, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Howard Rich, Texas prisoner #847823, appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his pro se, in forma pauperis 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. A

district court may dismiss a § 1983 complaint sua sponte under 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) when the complaint demonstrates that the

claims asserted are barred by the applicable statute of

limitations. See Moore v. McDonald, 30 F.3d 616, 620 (5th Cir.

1994). Because there is no federal statute of limitations for

§ 1983 actions, the federal courts borrow the forum state's
No. 99-20987

-2-

general personal injury limitations period. Id. Texas’ general

personal injury limitations period is two years. Id. 

Rich’s cause of action accrued, at the latest, in August

1996, when he knew or had reason to know of the injury which

formed the basis of his complaint. See id. at 621. Rich filed

his complaint in September 1998. The district court did not

abuse its discretion in dismissing Rich’s civil rights complaint

as barred by the statute of limitations. See Gonzalez v. Wyatt,

157 F.3d 1016, 1019 (5th Cir. 1998).

AFFIRMED.
# Rupprecht Law P. A.
324 Datura Street, Suite 200 | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 P: (561) 222

- 6979 | E: jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com

July 28 , 2015 U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140, Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sir or Madam:
IMCO General Construction , Inc. ( FAA

- 2015

- 2584 ) confidentially submitted to 333exemptions@faa.gov on July 21 , 2015 and obtained receipt on July 23, 2015 for the following documents: 1) Flight Operations & Procedures Manual 2 ) Aircraft Flight Manual

- DJI Phantom 2 3 ) Aircraft Flight Manual

- DJI Phantom 3 4 ) PIC Qualification Process, Test & Logbook 5) VO Qualification Process & Test

If I can be of any assistance to further expedite this petition, please do not hesitate to contact me at (561)222

- 6979 or at my email jon@jrupprechtlaw.com

Sincerely yours,

_____________________ Jonathan Rupprecht, Esq.
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe quarterly report of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Mauceli,principal executive officer of Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P., the managinggeneral partner of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)                                TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m OR 78o(d)); and

(2)                               Theinformation contained in the Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.
| Date: August 20, 2007 | Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P.         |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                  | Managing General  Partner                 |
|                  |                                      |
|                  | By: Reef Oil  & Gas Partners, GP, LLC |
|                  |                                      |
|                  | /s/ Michael J.  Mauceli                   |   |
|                  | Michael J.  Mauceli                       |
|                  | Manager and  Member                       |
|                  | (principal  executive officer)            |

 

This certification is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability ofthat section.  This certification is notdeemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that theCompany specifically incorporates it by reference.

1

----
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10331 Summary Calendar

CYRILL ATHANASIOS KOLOCOTRONIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ALAN GREENSPAN, Chairman; FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - - October 31, 1997 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Cyrill Anthanasios Kolocotronis, who resides at the Missouri

State Mental Hospital, moves to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”)

from the district court’s dismissal of his complaint pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). A review of Kolocotronis’ complaint, in which he

urges this court to disband the Federal Reserve Board, shows that

it contains only “fantastic” and “delusional” allegations.

See Neitzke v. Williams

, 490 U .S. 319, 325 (1989). Because his

appeal of the denial of such a complaint is frivolous, he fails topresent a nonfrivolous issue for appeal, and his IFP motion is

DENIED. S ee F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 24(a); Carson v. Polley

, 689 F.2d 562,

586 (5th Cir. 1982). Kolocotronis’ appeal is DISMISSED as

frivolous. 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

We caution Kolocotronis that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposi tion of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Kolocotronis is further cautioned to review all pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

Kolocotronis’ motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED; MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.
<PAGE>


                             GRAHAM & COTTRILL, P.A.
                          Certified Public Accountants
                               350 E. Pine Street
                             Orlando, Florida 32801

                                  -----------

                                (407) 843-1681
                                (800) 342-2720
                           FACSIMILE (407) 423-3156




                                January 8, 1997




Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

     Re:  Eckler Industries, Inc.
          File Ref. No.: 759-07
                         ------

     We were previously the principal accountant for Eckler Industries, Inc.
and, under the date of December 3, 1993, we reported on financial statements of
Eckler Industries, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 1993.  On December 27,
1994, our appointment as principal accountant was terminated.  We have read the
statements of Eckler Industries, Inc. included under changes in accountants in
the Company's Form 10KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996 and we
agree with such statements.



                         /s/ Graham & Cottrill
                         Graham & Cottrill, P.A.
### SERVED : MARC H 12.201 2 JEPARTMEN"^O F 

### U. S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N :-;:v:f'§f;.Ojil(^;^^ ^ OFFIC E O FHEARING S -'-^^^ ' OPcRATlOrJ J WASHTNGTON , D C 

## i m

## m1 2 - p 2-

- 2"] I N THE MATTE ROF MIDWES T JE T CHARTER , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B E ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalty Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2012-002 9 NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 201 1 -GL-19-0024 ) ha s been , assigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e RichardC . Goodwin . Al l futur e pleading s andother communication s regardin g this proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FAA Hearin g Docket , an

dth e othe r

person s o n th e attache dServic e List .

Ronni e A . Yoder Chie f Administrativ e L a Attachment

- Servic e Lis tFDM S No . FAA-2012-002 9 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Ti mLode s Directo r o f Huma n Resource s Midwes t Je t Charter , Inc . 41 2 Airpor t

Roa d Mattoon , I L6193 8 Brian aMartino , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , AGL- 7 Grea t Lake s Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 230 0 Eas t

Devo n Avenu e ' DesPlaines , I L 6001 8 TEL : 847-294-7313 . FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

of.Transpqrtatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL: . 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Staf

f Assistant/Paralega l FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i dperson o r b y expeditedcourier , use llic followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2WI000 , Washington , D C 20591 . Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-43a .



### ^2 -
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1914 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1914

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on strontium halophosphate 
                          doped with europium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

  Mr. Roberts introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on strontium halophosphate 
                          doped with europium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STRONTIUM HALOPHOSPHATE DOPED WITH EUROPIUM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.73 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to strontium halophosphate 
doped with europium) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDRES GONZALEZ; APOLONIA 

GONZALEZ, 

Petitioners, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-71352 

Agency Nos. A079-533-624 

A070-722-166 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 15, 2019**

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Andres Gonzalez and Apolonia Gonzalez, natives and citizens of Mexico, 

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying 

their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 21 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-71352 

review de novo questions of law. Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 581 (9th Cir. 

2016). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not err by not addressing petitioners’ request for equitable 

tolling of the time and number limitations. Petitioners’ request was not based on a 

recognized ground for tolling, such as fraud, deception, or error. See id. at 582 

(time and numerical deadlines may be equitably tolled during periods when a 

petitioner is prevented from filing because of “deception, fraud, or error”). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
Exhibit 10.1

                                                                                Exhibit
    10.1

    PROMISSORY
      NOTE

    


    


    


    Principal
      Amount: $150,000                                                   January
      8, 2007

    


    


    FOR
      VALUE
      RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of Shixiong
      Chen
      at Room
      508, Tianan
      Hi-Tech Venture Center, No. 730,Yingbin Road, Panyu
      District, Guangzhou,China,511400, or at such other place as the holder of this
      Note may designate in writing the principal sum of ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY
      THOUSAND DOLLARS ($150,00) until paid, as follows:

    


    
      	 	
              Quarterly
                payments of $50,000 for the period starting April 1, 2007 and continuing
                each quarter thereafter until this Note shall be paid in full together
                with interest at 8% per annum;

            


    

    


    
      	 	
              The
                principal amount shall become due and payable in full on October
                1,
                2007.

            


    

    


    The
      undersigned hereby reserves the right to prepay this Note in whole or in part
      at
      any time without premium or penalty. 

    


    This
      note
      is secured by 80% of the shares of Magstone Innovation, Inc. as fully described
      in the AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT entered into January 8,
      2007, by and among SEQUIAM CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, or its assigns
      (“Buyer”), and SHIXIONG
      CHEN (“Seller”)

    


    This
      Note
      is to be construed and enforced accordingly to the laws of the State of
      Florida.

    


    If
      the
      undersigned defaults in paying principal sum as set forth above and if such
      default is not cured within thirty (30) days of the due date for such payments
      of interest or principal, the entire principal sum and accrued interest shall
      at
      once become due and payable without notice at the option of the holder of this
      Note. Maker shall have forty-five (45) days to cure a default. If payment is
      not
      made within the curative period then all right, title and interest to the
      collateral will revert to the holder of the Note.

    


    SEQUIAM
      CORPORATION

    


    


    


    BY:  ____________________________         

                             Mark
      L.
      Mroczkowski, Secretary
# L_2006337EN.01004501.xml

| 5.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 337/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 337/45

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 28 November 2006

on the accession of the Community to United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation No 107 on uniform provisions concerning the approval of category M2 or M3 vehicles with regard to their general construction

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/874/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997 with a view to accession by the European Community to the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions (Revised 1958 Agreement) (1), and in particular Article 3(3) and the second indent of Article 4(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the assent of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | The standardised requirements of Regulation No 107 on uniform provisions concerning the approval of category M2 or M3 vehicles with regard to their general construction are intended to remove technical barriers to the trade in motor vehicles between the Contracting Parties and to ensure a high level of safety and protection in the operation of vehicles. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The standardised requirements of Regulation No 107 on uniform provisions concerning the approval of category M2 or M3 vehicles with regard to their general construction are intended to remove technical barriers to the trade in motor vehicles between the Contracting Parties and to ensure a high level of safety and protection in the operation of vehicles.

| (2) | The Commission therefore considers that Regulation No 107 should become part of the Community system for the type approval of motor vehicles, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Commission therefore considers that Regulation No 107 should become part of the Community system for the type approval of motor vehicles,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1.   The Community shall apply Regulation No 107 of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on uniform provisions concerning the approval of category M2 or M3 vehicles with regard to their general construction.

2.   The text of the Regulation is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

Regulation No 107 of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on uniform provisions concerning the approval of category M2 or M3 vehicles with regard to their general construction shall become part of the Community type-approval system for motor vehicles.

Article 3

The Commission shall notify the Secretary-General of the United Nations of this Decision.

Done at Brussels, 28 November 2006.

For the Council

The President

E. HEINÄLUOMA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 346, 17.12.1997, p. 78.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5225]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

National Institute of Corrections


Advisory Board Meeting

Time and Date:  8 a.m.-4:30 p.m. on Monday, April 02, 2012. 8 a.m.-12 
p.m. on Tuesday, April 03, 2012.

Place:  Federal Bureau of Prisons, 500 First Street NW., Washington, DC 
20534, (202) 514-4222.

Matters To Be Considered:  Directors report; review of outcomes of 
November 2-3, 2011 Advisory Board Hearing (Shifting the Focus to 
Reshape Our Thinking Toward Performance Based Outcomes), presentations, 
future planning.

Contact Person for More Information:  Thomas Beauclair, Deputy 
Director, (202) 307-3106, extension 44254.

Morris L. Thigpen, Sr.,
Director, National Institute of Corrections.
[FR Doc. 2012-5225 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-36-M
---

Exhibit: 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Riverbank Resources Inc., (the "Company")
  on 10QSB for the period ending October 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Trevor Herbert,
  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
  to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

Date: December 6, 2005.

/s/ Trevor
HerbertTrevor Herbert

Chief Financial Officer(Title)

---
| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |   |   |                                                                                                                      |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:                November 7, 2007 |   |   | /s/              Tai-ming Ou                                                                                              |
|                                        |   |   | Tai-ming                    Ou,Chief                    Executive Officer(principal                    executive officer) |
|                                   |   |   |                                                                                                                      |
|                                   |   |   | /s/              Gary Zhao                                                                                                |
|                                   |   |   | Gary                Zhao,Chief                Financial Officer(principal                financial officer)               |

----