alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                          MINN DAK FARMER'S COOPERATIVE
              COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF NET PROCEEDS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

                                                                 Year Ended August 31,
                                                  --------------------------------------------------
                                                    1996       1995       1994       1993       1992
                                                  ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
<S>                                               <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>   
Earnings:
      Net proceeds before income taxes
           from continuing operations             56,872     75,422     33,643     70,609     52,452
      Fixed charges, excluding capitalized
           interest, see below                     2,898      2,973      1,557      1,588      1,034
      Amortization of capitalized interest            18         18         18         18         13
                                                  ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
                             Net Proceeds         59,788     78,413     35,218     72,215     53,499
                                                  ======     ======     ======     ======     ======

Fixed Charges:
      Interest Expense                             2,898      2,973      1,557      1,588      1,034
      Interest factor included in rentals (1)       --         --         --         --         --
                                                  ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
      Fixed charges, excluding capitalized
           interest                                2,898      2,973      1,557      1,588      1,034
      Interest capitalized                           669       --         --         --          135
                                                  ------     ------     ------     ------     ------

      Fixed charges                                3,567      2,973      1,557      1,588      1,169
                                                  ======     ======     ======     ======     ======

      Ratio of net proceeds to fixed charges       16.76      26.38      22.62      45.48      45.76
                                                  ======     ======     ======     ======     ======


(1)   The company does lease certain items, such as office equipment. Due to the
      proportionately small amounts involved, interest on such lease payments
      has not been included in the total of the company's fixed charges of the
      calculation of this ratio.
</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.57 MB)

Tags:Distribution, DLA, DLA Distribution Navy Bahrain

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTAT : FEDERA LAVIATIO NADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D C Aer o Ways , Inc. ,

Complainant , V
. Delawar e Rive r

& Ba y Authority , Respondent
. 

# E E J W

^ B - 4 

### 201 0 AIRPORT/ENVIRONMENTA L LAW , AGC-60 0 

# \H J

FA A Docke t

No
. 16-09-1 2

RESPONDEN T DELAWAR ERIVE RAN D BA Y AUTHORITY' S

MOTIO NT O DISMIS S — J C D

-- , rI '— H

---'CJ > Piirsuan t t o 1 4 C.F.R
. Sectio n16.23(j) , Responden t th e Delawar e Riye r

& M y Authority ("DRBA") , b y it s attorneys , hereb y move s t o dismis s all claim s o f th e Complaint
. Aer o Ways ' Complain t

shoul db e dismisse dbecaus e i t fail s t o stat e cognizabl e claim s an dfail s t o support

it s allegations
. Aer o Way s ha s faile dt o prov e th e allegation s i nit s Complain t that th e DRB A ha s violate dGran t Assuranc e 22(a) , (d) , (f ) o r (h) , o r Orde r 5190.6 A o r

ha s otherwis e unjustl y discriminate dagains t Aer o Way s i nviolatio no f th e DRBA' s federal obligations
. Th e ground s upo n whic hthi s motio n i s brough t are fully se t

fort hi nth e Memorandim i o f Point s an d Authoritie s an dAnswe r

filedcontemporaneousl y herewith
.

MORRJSTMCHOLS , ARSH T& TUNNEL LLL P

Februarys , 201 0 Brow n Albert J
. Carrol l 120 1 N
. Marke t

Stree t P.O
. Bo x 134 7 Wihnington , Delawar e 19899-134 7 Telephone : (302 ) 658-920 0 Attorney s fo r

Responden t

Delawar e Rive r

& Bay AuthorityCERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E Th e undersigne dhereb y certifie s that o nth e 3rdda y o f

February , 2010 , sh e cause dt o b e serve dth e RESPONDEN T DELAWAR ERIVE RAN D BA Y AUTHORITY' S MOTIO NT O DISMIS S o n th e followin g i nth e manne r indicated : B Y FEDERA LEXPRES S Offic e o f th e Chie f Coimse l Attn : FA A Par t

1 6 Airport

Proceeding s Docket , AGC-61 0 Roo m92 5 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Origina l an dthre e copie s ElizabethNewma n Airport s La w Branch , AGC-61 0 Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , R M 92 3 Washington , D C 2059 1 On e cop y B Y FEDERA LEXPRES S Josep hMichae l Lamonaca , Esq
. Attorne y for

Aer o Ways , Inc
. Ne w Castl e Count y Airport P.O
. Bo x 1058 3 Wihnington , D E19850-058 3 Email : avlaw@prodigy.ne t On e cop y
Exhibit 10.16
 EXECUTION VERSION
 Joinder Agreement
 Section 15 GMAC Pledge and Security Agreement Operating Agreement New Equity Pledgor GL Marbella
 Annex A
  Annex B Annex A
  Joinder Agreement  Equity Investment IV




---



##### 



Joinder Agreement  Equity Investment IV
 2




---



##### 



EQUITY INVESTMENT IV, LLCBy:
    /s/ Donald V. PierceName:  Donald V. PierceTitle:  Vice President 
 GMAC, LLC 
as Lender AgentBy: /s/ David C. WalkerName: David C. WalkerTitle: Group VP/TreasurerWELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
as First Priority Collateral AgentBy: /s/ Alfia Monastra

Name: Alfia MonastraTitle: Vice PresidentWELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
as Collateral Control AgentBy: /s/ Alfia Monastra

Name: Alfia MonastraTitle: Vice President
 Joinder Agreement  Equity Investment IV




---



##### 



GMAC MORTGAGE, LLCBy: /s/ Melissa White

Name: Melissa WhiteTitle: Assistant TreasurerRESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLCBy: /s/ Donald V. Pierce

Name: Donald V. PierceTitle: Vice President
 Joinder Agreement  Equity Investment IV




---



##### 



Description of Collateral
   Item A Attachment I
  Item
D Attachment I
   Item B Attachment I Annex B
      Joinder Agreement  Equity Investment IV
 A-1




---



##### 



provided Collateral Annex A
 Joinder Agreement  Equity Investment IV
 A-2




---



##### 



Updated Information to Schedules I-XI and Attachment I  to Pledge and Security Agreement and Irrevocable Proxy
  EQUITY INVESTMENT IV, LLC
 
  EQUITY INVESTMENT IV, LLC
   Jurisdiction ofIncorporationParent
    
    Subsidiary
    
    (Subsidiary)Equity Investment IV,
LLC
    
    Marbella Lakes Associates, LLC
    
    Delaware
 Joinder Agreement  Equity Investment IV
 B-1




---



##### 



InterestType of
    
    Interests Owned
    
    
    
    % of Interests ofPledged Interests Issuer
    
    Interests
    
    by Pledgor
    
    Pledgor
    
    Pledgor PledgedMarbella Lakes
    
    Limited Liability Company
    
    66.67%
    
    Equity Investment IV, LLC
    
    100%Associates, LLC(f/k/a DOA
Properties VIII
(Marbella Lakes),
LLC)
 Joinder Agreement  Equity Investment IV
 B-2
Transport Airplane Directorate 

 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

June 16, 2010 

Mr. Karl Seuring 

Managing Director 

The Leading Edge Group, LLC 

3425 Carillon Point 

Kirkland, WA 98033 

Dear Mr. Seuring: 

This letter is to inform you that, because the FAA has not received a re-petition for 

exemption per, and within the 30-day response time described in, our previous 

correspondence of April 15, 2010, we are closing the project for docket no. FAA-2010-

0309. 

If you choose to reply to this matter in the future, please reference the above docket number 

in your correspondence and petition, and we will restart the project. 

If you have questions in the meantime, you may call Ian Won at (425) 227-2145, e-mail 

ian.won@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

 /s/ 

Franklin Tiangsing 

Manager, Airframe and Cabin Safety Branch 

Transport Standards Staff 

Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service
Order Granting Extension of Time PAGE 1

3500-001

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA-24-0261

Attorney for Appellees,

Paul S. Henning and Aaron J. Davies

Logan Nutzman, Esq.

Don C. St. Peter, Esq.

ST. PETER O’BRIEN LAW OFFICES, P.C.

2620 Radio Way

P.O. Box 2620

Missoula, MT 59808

Telephone: (406) 728-8282

Fax: (406) 728-8141

Email: logan@stplawoffices.com; don@stplawoffices.com

CHRISTOPHER SHELTON, VICKY 

COSTA, AND TODD COSTA,

Appellants,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA, DEPARTMENT OF 

PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 

an agency of the State of Montana, SUSAN

RIDGEWAY, AXILON LAW GROUP, PLLC,

PAUL S. HENNING, AARON J. DAVIES and 

DOES 1-20,

Appellees.

ON APPEAL FROM THE MONTANA FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, LEWIS 

AND CLARK COUNTY, CAUSE NO.: ADV-2018-830 

THE HONORABLE MIKE MENAHAN

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

08/30/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0261
Order Granting Extension of Time PAGE 2

3500-001

UPON REVIEW OF Appellees Henning and Davies’ Motion for Extension of 

Time to Appellee’s Response Brief, and good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 

that the Extension is GRANTED. 

Appellees shall file their Response Brief on or before October 7, 2024.

ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 30 2024
#### In the Matter of Thurston Sneed, Appellant, v Rosetta Weekes, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act § 651, in which the petitioner father seeks custody of the parties’ minor son, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), entered *475August 23, 1989, which, after a hearing, *inter alia,*awarded custody of the parties’ minor son to the respondent mother.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner father’s contention, the Family Court properly balanced all of the relevant factors in determining that it was in the best interests of the parties’ minor son to reside with his mother. Therefore, there is no reason for a new hearing on the custody petition. Kooper, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-60727

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANIEL J. RUSH,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:92-CR88PR-02

- - - - - - - - - -

June 25, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Daniel J. Rush (#23183-034) has applied for leave to proceed

in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this appeal from the denial of his

motion for production of transcripts at Government expense. Rush

has also moved this court for an order requiring production of

the transcripts. There is no pending appeal from Rush’s criminal

conviction and Rush has not filed a post-conviction motion

challenging his conviction or sentence. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f). 
No. 95-60727

- 2 -

“[A] federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court

records at government expense to search for possible defects,

merely because of his status as an indigent.” Cowan v. United

States, 445 F.2d 855 (5th Cir. 1971). The motion for leave to

proceed IFP is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is

DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The motion for production of

transcripts at Government expense is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Keewatin Windpower Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: January 17, 2006


/s/ Chris Craddock
-------------------------------------------
Chris Craddock, Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TAL International Group, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Chand Khan, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 7, 2007

/s/ Chand KhanChand Khan
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 28, 2014

s0224

Order 

Clerk

February 28, 2014

148241

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148241

COA: 311055

Oakland CC: 2011-236092-FH

ARSENIO DEANDRE HENDRIX,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Filed 2/21/14 P. v. Kelley CA2/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

MICHAEL KELLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

 B248328

 (Los Angeles County

 Super. Ct. No. NA092929)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 

Tomson T. Ong, Judge. Affirmed.

Hancock and Spears and Alan E. Spears, under appointment by the Court of 

Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
2

BACKGROUND

Defendant Michael Kelley was charged with one count of carrying a dirk or 

dagger (Pen. Code, § 21310)1and five prior prison terms (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). 

According to the probation report, officers conducted a parole search of defendant 

and recovered a knife with a fixed blade locked in position. On August 3, 2012, 

defendant pled guilty to the charge, and admitted the priors. He was sentenced to 

eight years in state prison. Execution of sentence was suspended, and he was 

placed on probation for three years and ordered to serve 365 days in the county 

jail. 

On February 27, 2013, defendant admitted he was in violation of probation 

based on his possession of methamphetamine. The trial court terminated probation 

and imposed the suspended eight-year sentence, with credit for 288 actual days 

plus 148 days conduct credit. Defendant appealed from the judgment. 

After review of the record, appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed an 

opening brief asking this court to review the record independently pursuant to 

People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.

Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 

days raising any contentions that he wished us to consider. No response has been 

received to date.

We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that no arguable issues 

exist, and that appellant has, by virtue of counsel’s compliance with the Wende 

procedure and our review of the record, received adequate and effective appellate 

review of the judgment entered against him in this case. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 

528 U.S. 259, 278; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 112-113.)

 

1 All section references are to the Penal Code.
3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

WILLHITE, J.

We concur:

EPSTEIN, P. J.

MANELLA, J.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Vincent Verdiramo, President of Serino 6, Corp. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 22, 2006



/s/ Vincent L. Verdiramo

___________________________



President
June 10, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KATRINA BURNETT AND FREDERICK BURNETT, Appellants

NO. 14-12-01159-CV V.

CARNES FUNERAL HOME, INC. AND CREMATE TEXAS, INC., Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, Carnes 

Funeral Home, Inc. and Cremate Texas, Inc., signed November 2, 2012, was heard 

on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in 

the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED. We further 

order that appellees’ motion for sanctions is DENIED.

We order appellants, Katrina Burnett and Frederick Burnett, jointly and 

severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,929
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      979
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,625
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,898
<PP&E>                                          28,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,557
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,272
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,077
<SALES>                                         57,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,084
<CGS>                                           14,778
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,685
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,256
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,429
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,429
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78
        

</TABLE>