NAIMA/U.S. EPA 

Emissions Test Report

Prepared for: 

Industrial Insulation Group, LLC 

Phenix City Plant 

908 John Bussey Drive 

Phenix City, Alabama 36869 

Project No. 10-3990.14 

January 28, 2011 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 

2615 Wolcott Street 

Ferndale, Michigan 48220 

(248) 548-8070
Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 

i

Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production1 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing2. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the Cupola located at the 

Industrial Insulation Group LLC Plant in Phenix City, Alabama: 

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

In addition, NAIMA retained BTEC to evaluate emissions rates for the compounds listed below 

from the exhaust stack associated with the Curing Oven at the Phenix City complex: 

• Formaldehyde, Phenol and Methanol 

• Carbon Monoxide and Carbonyl Sulfide 

Testing was performed by METCO Environmental (METCO) of Carrollton, Texas on behalf of 

BTEC. Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. 

EPA and NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. Tables I and II on the following 

pages summarize the overall results of the emissions test program. 

 

1

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 

2

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 

ii

Table I 

Cupola Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM2.5 5.7E+00 1.6E+01 

Organic 

Condensible PM2.5

 1.9E-01 5.6E-01 

Inorganic 

Condensible PM2.5

 7.8E+00 2.3E+01 

Cupola - 

Stack 101

October 26 

& 27, 2010 

Total PM2.5 1.4E+01 4.0E+01 

Filterable 

Particulate 3.4E+00 1.0E+01 

Antimony < 7.3E-05 2.2E-04 

Arsenic < 7.3E-05 2.2E-04 

Beryllium < 1.8E-05 5.4E-05 

Cadmium 2.4E-04 7.0E-04 

Chromium 3.0E-04 8.8E-04 

Cobalt 2.2E-04 6.5E-04 

Lead 8.7E-04 2.6E-03 

Manganese < 3.1E-04 9.0E-04 

Nickel 5.5E-04 1.6E-03 

Cupola - 

Stack 101

October 26 

& 27, 2010 

Selenium 1.6E-03 4.7E-03 

Cupola - 

Stack 101

October 28, 

2010 Mercury 3.8E-06 1.1E-05 

Cupola - 

Stack 101

October 27 

& 28, 2010 

Hexavalent 

Chromium < 7.0E-05 2.1E-04 

Hydrogen 

Chloride Cupola - < 5.9E-02 1.7E-01 

Stack 101

October 26 

& 27, 2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 7.3E-02 2.2E-01 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 
Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 

iii

Table II 

Curing Oven Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Formaldehyde 2.9E-01 1.5E+01 

Methanol 6.7E-04 3.5E-02 

Curing 

Oven 

October 26, 

2010 

Phenol 2.5E-03 1.3E-01 

Curing Carbonyl Sulfide 1.9E+00 2.1E-04 

Oven 

October 26, 

2010 Carbon Monoxide 2.2E-03 2.8E+01 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 
Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2

2.1 PROCESS MONITORING ....................................................................................................... 2 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 3

3.1 EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY, MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND MOISTURE CONTENT .................... 3 

3.2 PM AND PM2.5 CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................................... 4 

3.3 TOTAL SELECTED METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................ 4 

3.4 HG CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................................... 4 

3.5 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................. 5 

3.6 HF AND HCL CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................... 5 

3.7 HCOH, MEOH AND PHENOL CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES ............................ 5 

3.8 CO AND COS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES .................................................... 5 

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 7

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel 

Table 2 – Cupola Emissions Test Program Summary 

Table 3 – Curing Oven Emissions Test Program Summary 

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Cupola Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram 

Figure 2 – Curing Oven Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram 

Figure 3 – Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 4 – OTM 27/OTM 28 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 5 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 6 – Method 30B Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 7 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 8 – Method 26A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 9 – Method 316 Sampling Train Schematic Diagram 

Figure 10 – Method 318 Sampling Train Schematic Diagram 

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results 

Appendix B – Process Data 

Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Sheets and Notes 

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents 

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports 

Appendix F – Method 318 Analytical Report
Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 

1

1.0 Introduction 

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production3 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing4. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the Cupola located at the 

Industrial Insulation Group LLC (IIG) Plant in Phenix City, Alabama: 

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

In addition, NAIMA retained BTEC to evaluate emissions rates for the compounds listed below 

from the exhaust stack associated with the Curing Oven at the Phenix City complex: 

• Formaldehyde, Phenol and Methanol 

• Carbon Monoxide and Carbonyl Sulfide 

Testing was performed by METCO Environmental (METCO) of Carrollton, Texas on behalf of 

BTEC. Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. 

EPA and NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was 

conducted on October 26, 27, and 28, 2010. 

The test program consisted of triplicate emission tests at each location for each parameter. The 

field sampling portion of the emissions test program included the personnel summarized by Table 

1. 

Table 1 

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation 

Shane Lee METCO 

Ryan Jones METCO 

Will Starkey METCO 

Jeremiah Johnson METCO 

Mike Luckett METCO 

Rick Dolin IIG 

 

3

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 

4

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 

2

2.0 Process Description

Basalt, dolomite, and limestone are fed to a coke-fired cupola furnace and melted to be formed 

into mineral wool. Emissions from this cupola are exhausted through a baghouse, a regenerative 

thermal oxidizer and a single exhaust stack (Stack 101). The stack is 8.5 feet in diameter and is 

equipped with four test ports, each six inches in diameter. 

After being formed into mineral wool, the mat is fed through curing ovens where the mineral 

wool resin reaction is cured. Emissions from the curing ovens are exhausted through a 

filterhouse, an afterburner, and a single exhaust stack (Stack 102). This stack is 26 inches in 

diameter. 

2.1 Process Monitoring 

During the emissions test program, the Cupola and Curing Oven were operated under normal 

conditions. In addition to production rate during each test run, process operating data recorded 

during the emissions test program included raw material feed rates, baghouse pressure drop, and 

regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) operating temperature. Process production data is available 

in Appendix B. Other process and control equipment data will be available to U.S. EPA on 

request. 
Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 

3

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies 

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emissions test program can be separated into 

eight categories as follows: 

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content; 

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM and PM2.5 concentrations and emission rates; 

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals concentrations and emission rates; 

(4) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and emission rates; 

(5) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates; 

(6) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentrations and emission rates; and, 

(7) Measurement of exhaust gas formaldehyde, methanol, and phenol concentrations and 

emission rates. 

(8) Measurement of exhaust gas CO and COS concentrations and emission rates. 

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by category are summarized by Sections 

3.1 through 3.8, respectively. 

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content 

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content was conducted 

using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code 

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A): 

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points” 

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate” 

• Method 3A - “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in 

Emissions from Stationary Sources”(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust gas flowrates in conjunction with the 

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate pollutant emission rates. 

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in 

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figures 1 and 2 for traverse location drawings). An S-type pitot 

tube with a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was 

used to measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each 

location during testing. The S-type pitot tube dimensions was within specified limits, therefore, 

a baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensionless) was assigned. 

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A. The O2 content of the 

exhaust gas was measured using a M&C Products PMA 100-L O2 gas analyzer (or equivalent) 

and the CO2 content of the exhaust gas was measured using a California Analytical Instruments 

(CAI0 600 Series CO2 gas analyzer (or equivalent). An integrated sample of the gas stream was 

drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe with an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any 

particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizing an evacuated sample lung. At the completion of 
Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 

4

each test the gas sample was introduced to the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-second 

intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition software. A schematic drawing of the emission 

monitoring system is provided as Figure 3. 

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was 

determined volumetrically (liquid impingers) and gravimetrically (silica gel impinger). 

3.2 PM and PM2.5 Concentrations and Emission Rates 

PM/PM2.5 concentrations and emission rates were measured using U.S. EPA Other Test 

Methods (OTM) 27 and OTM 28. PM, PM2.5, and CPM concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This 

system consisted of (1) a tapered nozzle, (2) a PM10 particle sizer cyclone followed by a PM2.5

particle sizer cyclone, (3) a glass or quartz fiber filter assembly and heated probe, (4) a glass 

recirculating ice water condenser system, (5) a set of four GS impingers, (6) a length of sample 

line, and (7) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated 

orifice. Prior to each test, the second and third impingers were filled with 100 ml of HPLC 

water, the first and fourth impingers were empty, and the fifth impinger contained 

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the PM2.5/CPM sample 

train is provided as Figure 4. The total filterable PM fraction was collected on the front half of 

the M29 Metals sampling train as per the QAPP. 

3.3 Total Selected Metals Concentrations and Emission Rates

Total selected metals concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This 

system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or quartz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a 

heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of six GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, 

and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. 

Prior to each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid 

(HNO3)/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the fourth 

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the metals 

sampling train is provided as Figure 5. 

3.4 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix A, Method 30B and using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack 

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a sorbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon 

tubing, (4) three GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case 

equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The first impinger was left empty 

as a water knockout, and the remaining two impingers contained approximately 300 g of silica 

gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 6. 
Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 

5

3.5 Hexavalent Chromium Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. Hexavalent chromium concentrations and 

emission rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack 

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a 

glass probe liner, (3) a Teflon tee with a recirculating pump, (4) five GS impingers, (5) a length 

of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a 

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the 

next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger 

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061 

sampling train is provided as Figure 7. 

3.6 HF and HCl Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of hydrogen halide concentrations and emission rates were conducted using the 

procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 26A. The Method 26A sampling train consisted 

of: (1) a heated borosilicate or quartz probe liner; (2) a heated borosilicate or quartz glass filter 

holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter washed quartz filter with Teflon filter 

support; (3) a set of three Greensburg-Smith (GS) impingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1 

Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H2SO4), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known weight of 

silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech control case equipped with a 

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Figure 8 provides an illustration of the Method 26A 

sample train. 

3.7 HCOH, MeOH and Phenol Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of HCOH, phenol, and MeOH concentrations and emission rates were conducted 

using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 316 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM98.01. HCOH, phenol, and MeOH concentrations and emission rates were be measured using 

Metco’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system consisted 

of (1) a steel nozzle, (2) a heated probe with a glass probe liner, (3) four GS impingers, (4) a 

length of sample line, and (5) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and 

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first three impingers were filled with high purity water,

and the last impinger contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic 

drawing of the Method 316 sampling train is provided as Figure 9. 

3.8 CO and COS Concentrations and Emission Rates

Measurement of CO and COS concentrations and emission rates were conducted using the 

procedures of 40 CFR 63, Appendix A, Method 318. Stack exhaust gas was continually purging 

through the sampling system and the Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer. The 

sample gas was extracted from the stack using a heated, stainless steel probe, maintained at 

191°C. A heated filter box (191°C) connects from the probe to the filter assembly to a heated 
Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 

6

transfer line. A 0.1μ glass filter was used for particulate matter removal. A heated, diaphragm 

pump was used to pull the sample from the stack. 

The heated transfer line, held at 191°C, connected the probe/filter assembly to the FTIR. The 

FTIR was equipped with a temperature-controlled, 5.11 meter multipass gas cell maintained at 

191°C. Gas flows and sampling system pressures were monitored using a rotometer and 

pressure transducer. 

FTIR data was collected using an MKS MultiGas 2030 FTIR spectrometer. All data was 

collected at 0.5cm-1 resolution. Each sample spectrum was derived from the co-addition of 60 

scans, with a new data point generated every one minute. Figure 10 provides an illustration of 

the Method 318 sample train. 
Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 

7

4.0 Test Results 

The overall results of the emissions test program are summarized by Tables 2 and 3 below. 

Table 2 

Cupola Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM2.5 5.7E+00 1.6E+01 

Organic 

Condensible PM2.5

 1.9E-01 5.6E-01 

Inorganic 

Condensible PM2.5

 7.8E+00 2.3E+01 

Cupola - 

Stack 101

October 26 

& 27, 2010 

Total PM2.5 1.4E+01 4.0E+01 

Filterable 

Particulate 3.4E+00 1.0E+01 

Antimony < 7.3E-05 2.2E-04 

Arsenic < 7.3E-05 2.2E-04 

Beryllium < 1.8E-05 5.4E-05 

Cadmium 2.4E-04 7.0E-04 

Chromium 3.0E-04 8.8E-04 

Cobalt 2.2E-04 6.5E-04 

Lead 8.7E-04 2.6E-03 

Manganese < 3.1E-04 9.0E-04 

Nickel 5.5E-04 1.6E-03 

Cupola - 

Stack 101

October 26 

& 27, 2010 

Selenium 1.6E-03 4.7E-03 

Cupola - 

Stack 101

October 28, 

2010 Mercury 3.8E-06 1.1E-05 

Cupola - 

Stack 101

October 27 

& 28, 2010 

Hexavalent 

Chromium < 7.0E-05 2.1E-04 

Hydrogen 

Chloride Cupola - < 5.9E-02 1.7E-01 

Stack 101

October 26 

& 27, 2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 7.3E-02 2.2E-01 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 
Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 

8

Table II 

Curing Oven Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Formaldehyde 2.9E-01 1.5E+01 

Methanol 6.7E-04 3.5E-02 

Curing 

Oven 

October 26, 

2010 

Phenol 2.5E-03 1.3E-01 

Curing Carbonyl Sulfide 1.9E+00 2.1E-04 

Oven 

October 26, 

2010 Carbon Monoxide 2.2E-03 2.8E+01 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 

Detailed results for individual emission test runs are summarized in Appendix A. Process data 

associated with the emissions test program is provided in Appendix B. Field and computergenerated data sheets are included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents 

and Appendix E includes laboratory analytical reports. Appendix F includes the Method 318 

analytical report. 
Industrial Insulation Group, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.14 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 28, 2010 

9

Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or 

Thermafiber, Inc. BTEC will not distribute or publish this report without NAIMA’s consent 

except as required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent 

performance of its duties in executing the assignment and preparing reports in accordance with 

the normal standards of the profession, but disclaims any responsibility for consequential 

damages. 

This report was prepared by: 

David Center 

Staff Environmental Engineer 

This report was reviewed by: 

Randal J. Tysar 

Senior Environmental Engineer 
FIGURES 
Diameter:

102.00 in

Points Distance "

12 2.1

11 6.8

10 12.0

9 18.1

8 25.5

7 36.3

6 65.7

5 76.5

4 83.9

3 90.0

2 95.2

1 99.9

Site:

Industrial Insulation Group

Phenix City, Alabama Site

Cupola Stack (101)

Figure 1

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Not to Scale

<0.5 diameters

 <2 diameters
Diameter:

26.00 in

Points Distance "

12 0.5

11 1.7

10 3.1

9 4.6

8 6.5

7 9.3

6 16.7

5 19.5

4 21.4

3 22.9

2 24.3

1 25.5

Site:

Industrial Insulation Group

Phenix City, Alabama Site

Curing Oven Stack (102)

Figure 2

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Not to Scale

<0.5 diameters

 <2 diameters
Bags Samples

to analyzers

Figure 3

Site:

USEPA Method 3A

Industrial Insulation Group

Phenix City, Alabama

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System

Calibration Gases 

(Fed to Probe Tip)

Environics Gas 

Dilution System

M&C Model 100-L

O2 Analyzer

CAI Series 600

CO2 Analyzer

pump

tedlar 

bag
Figure 4

Site:USEPA OTM27/28Industrial Insulation GroupPhenix City, Alabama

BT Environmen

2615 

Ferndale

Silica gel

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

45mm Filter Housing

Verticle Condenser Filter Holder W/ Tef

Pot Belly Impinger 100 mL DI H2O
Figure 5

Site:USEPA Method 29Industrial Insulation GroupPhenix City, Alabama

BT Environmen

2615 Wo

Ferndale, M

Silica gel

100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solution 

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5
Figure 6

Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainIndustrial Insulation GroupPhenix City, Alabama

BT Environme

2615 W

Ferndale, 

Knock out

Temperature sensor

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Sample Line

MercuryT rap

Probe
Figure 7

Site:USEPA Method 0061Industrial Insulation GroupPhenix City, Alabama

BT Environm

26

Fern

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

150 mL 0.1 N KOH Empty Silica Gel

Perastaltic pump

Teflon tee

75 mL 0.1 N KOH
Empty

Figure 8

Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainIndustrial Insulation GroupPhenix City, Alabama

BT Environm

2615 

Ferndale

Heated Filter Box

S-type pitot w/ thermocouple

Heated probe with glass liner

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Empty 100 mL 0.1N 
Figure 9

Site:USEPA Method 316Industrial Insulation GroupPhenix City, Alabama

BT Environmen

2615 Wo

Ferndale, M

100 ml Ultrafiltered H Silica gel 2O

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5
heated sample line

Figure 10

Site:

USEPA Method 318

Industrial Insulation Group

Phenix City, Alabama

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan 48220

Data Acquisition System

Calibration and Tracer Gases 

(Fed to Probe Tip)

MKS MultiGas 2030 

FTIR spectrometer
APPENDIX A 

DETAILED TEST RUN 

RESULTS 
Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing - 26A

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/26/2010 10/27/2010 10/27/2010

Start Run Start Time 18:01:00 12:30:00 14:45:00

Run Finish Time 19:08:00 14:40:00 15:48:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 60

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.805 0.805 0.805 0.81

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.46 29.73 29.66 29.62

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.23 1.36 1.36 1.32

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 43.761 44.959 44.356 44.359

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 91.46 87.42 92.08 90.32

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 41.920 43.796 42.743 42.820

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 42.9 52.5 48.5 48.0

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.02 2.47 2.28 2.26

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.6 5.3 5.1 5.0

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.954 0.947 0.949 0.950

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.90 1.01 1.01 0.97

%O2 Oxygen, % 19.80 19.84 19.84 19.83

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.3 79.15 79.15 79.2

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.94 28.96 28.96 28.95

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.43 28.37 28.40 28.40

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.23

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.48 29.74 29.67 29.63

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 177 205 206 196

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.316 0.327 0.327 0.323

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 33.6 34.9 34.9 34.5

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 57.6 57.6 57.6 57.6

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 90,087 90,528 89,939 90,185

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 120,510 116,224 120,538 119,090

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 104.3 109.0 106.5 106.6

Wp Production, tons rock charged to the cupola per hour

W HCl Catch Weight, μg 230 200 200 210

Cmg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E-01 1.6E-01 1.7E-01 1.7E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.6E-02 5.4E-02 5.6E-02 5.9E-02

Elb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W HF Catch Weight, μg 380 200 200 260

Cmg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 3.2E-01 1.6E-01 1.7E-01 2.2E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-01 5.4E-02 5.6E-02 7.3E-02

Elb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Intl. Insulation Group 10-3990.14

Phenix City, AL

Source Cupola (stack 101)

Personnel Luckett
Plant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/26/2010 10/26/2010 10/27/2010

Start Run Start Time 10:10:00 14:15:00 8:37:00

Run Finish Time 13:27:00 17:36:00 11:56:00

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.805 0.805 0.805 0.81

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.60 29.44 29.78 29.61

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.21 1.24 1.24 1.23

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 134.164 136.270 137.525 135.986

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 91.38 94.84 88.31 91.51

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 129.140 129.656 133.934 130.910

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 138.3 125.4 149.9 137.9

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 6.51 5.90 7.06 6.49

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.8 4.4 5.0 4.7

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.952 0.956 0.950 0.953

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.96 0.87 1.01 0.95

%O2 Oxygen, % 19.78 19.73 19.62 19.71

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.26 79.4 79.37 79.3

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.94 28.93 28.95 28.94

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.42 28.45 28.40 28.42

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.62 29.46 29.80 29.63

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 189 179 202 190

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.312 0.319 0.324 0.319

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 33.7 33.8 34.5 34.0

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 57.6 57.6 57.6 57.6

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 91,003 89,174 90,010 90,062

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 116,911 116,323 119,355 117,529

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.7 99.9 104.4 102.0

Wp Production, tons rock charged to the cupola per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 39.1 22.7 49.7 37.2

Cmg/dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 10.7 6.2 13.1 10.0

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.57 2.11 4.42 3.37

Elb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

Cmg/dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 2.2E-04 2.2E-04 2.1E-04 2.2E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.3E-05 7.4E-05 7.1E-05 7.3E-05

Elb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

Cmg/dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 2.2E-04 2.2E-04 2.1E-04 2.2E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.3E-05 7.4E-05 7.1E-05 7.3E-05

Elb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

Cmg/dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.5E-05 5.4E-05 5.3E-05 5.4E-05

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-05 1.9E-05 1.8E-05 1.8E-05

Elb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 1.39 6.01 0.26 2.55

Cmg/dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 3.8E-04 1.6E-03 6.9E-05 7.0E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.3E-04 5.6E-04 2.3E-05 2.4E-04

Elb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 4.5 3.5 1.7 3.2

Cmg/dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.2E-03 9.5E-04 4.5E-04 8.8E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.1E-04 3.2E-04 1.5E-04 3.0E-04

Elb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 2.76 3.61 0.76 2.38

Cmg/dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 7.5E-04 9.8E-04 2.0E-04 6.5E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.5E-04 3.4E-04 6.8E-05 2.2E-04

Elb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 6.5 20.4 1.5 9.5

Cmg/dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 1.8E-03 5.6E-03 4.0E-04 2.6E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.9E-04 1.9E-03 1.3E-04 8.7E-04

Elb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 3.6 4.9 1.5 3.3

Cmg/dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 9.8E-04 1.3E-03 4.0E-04 9.0E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-04 4.5E-04 1.3E-04 3.1E-04

Elb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 5.4 7.9 4.8 6.0

Cmg/dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-03 2.2E-03 1.3E-03 1.6E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.9E-04 7.3E-04 4.3E-04 5.5E-04

Elb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 15.5 15.0 21.9 17.5

Cmg/dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 4.2E-03 4.1E-03 5.8E-03 4.7E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.4E-03 1.4E-03 1.9E-03 1.6E-03

Elb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Intl. Insulation Group 10-3990.14

Phenix City, AL

Source Cupola

Personnel Luckett
M30B Mercury Testing

Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source IDIntl. Insulation Group Phenix City, AL Michigan Cupola 101 Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"

Measured Value 

(mg/dscm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(mg/dscm at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 30B) Data F

BDL

1 10/28/2010 9:15 10/28/2010 11:15 8.59E-06 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 

2 10/28/2010 11:35 10/28/2010 13:35 1.57E-05 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 3 10/28/2010 13:50 10/28/2010 15:50 8.55E-06 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 

Total Vapor Phase Mercury Em

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date Test End Time

Page 1 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

 QA/QC Documentation

Process 

Production Rate

(tons rock/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Trap ID Section 1 Mass (ng) Section 2 Mass (ng) Total Mass (ng) Initial Spike (ng) Total Non- Spike (ng) Sample Volume (dscm) Volum

Differenc

4.6 1.12 19.76 114,476 89,461 186.33 Moisture and Flows from 0061 Run 2: 9:15-12:21 R1, A 0.63 0.44 1.07 0 1.07 0.12 

4.6 1.13 19.76 114,476 89,461 181.84 Moisture and Flows from 0061 Run 2: 9:15-12:21 R2, A 1.47 0.48 1.95 0 1.95 0.12 4.6 1.13 19.76 112,633 88,173 180.33 Moisture and Flows from 0061 Run 3: 12:40-15:45 R3, A 0.58 0.44 1.02 0 1.02 0.12 

Trap #1

Flue Gas 

Temperature (F) Other Supporting Information

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas Flow 

Rate (dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(acfm)

Page 2 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

Concentration 

(μg/dscm) Trap ID Section 1 Mass Section 2 Mass Total Mass Initial Spike Total Non- Spike Sample Volume Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration (μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C

0.01 R1, B 20.1 0.37 20.47 20 0.47 0.12 2% 2 0.00 0.0 38 0.02 R2, B 21.1 0.53 21.63 20 1.63 0.12 4% 3 0.01 0.0 7 0.01 R3, B 19.1 0.28 19.38 20 -0.62 0.12 1% 1 0.00 0.0 100 

Trap #2 Paired Trap Agreement (RD) 

≤20% of field 

recovery test

≤ 10% of Section 

1 Hg mass for Hg 

conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or ≤ 

20% of Section 1 

for Hg conc.≤1 

μg/dscm

≥10 % RD mass 

for Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or 

≤20% RD or ≤0.2 

μg/dscm abs.diff. 

for Hg conc. ≤1 

μg/dscm

Page 3 of 3 
Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing - 0061

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/27/2010 10/28/2010 10/28/2010

Start Run Start Time 12:30:00 9:15:00 12:40:00

Run Finish Time 15:40:00 12:21:00 15:45:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 180

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.293 0.293 0.293 0.293

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.805 0.805 0.805 0.81

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.011 1.011 1.011 1.011

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.73 29.92 29.94 29.86

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.44 1.40 1.35 1.40

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 133.725 133.124 131.869 132.906

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 83.68 77.82 81.44 80.98

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 130.928 132.586 130.528 131.347

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 130.7 135.9 133.2 133.3

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 6.15 6.40 6.27 6.27

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.6

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.955 0.954 0.954 0.954

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.01 1.12 1.13 1.09

%O2 Oxygen, % 19.84 19.76 19.76 19.79

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.15 79.12 79.11 79.1

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.96 28.97 28.97 28.97

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.46 28.46 28.47 28.47

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O 0.2 0.20 0.20 0.20

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.74 29.93 29.95 29.88

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 199 185 184 189

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.318 0.308 0.299 0.308

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 34.1 33.1 32.6 33.3

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 57.6 57.6 57.6 57.6

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 89,461 89,470 88,173 89,035

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 114,476 117,659 112,633 114,923

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.2 101.5 101.2 101.0

Wp Production, tons rock charged to the cupola per hour

W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 1.5 0.4 0.4 0.8

Cmg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 4.1E-04 1.1E-04 1.1E-04 2.1E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.4E-04 3.6E-05 3.6E-05 7.0E-05

Elb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Intl. Insulation Group 10-3990.14

Phenix City, AL

Source Cupola

Personnel JOHNSON/LUCKETT
Plant Job #

Location HCOH, MeOH, Phenol Testing

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/26/10 10/26/2010 10/26/2010

Start Run Start Time 9:01:00 11:07:00 13:55:00

Run Finish Time 10:14:00 12:17:00 15:07:00

Net Traversing Points 20 20 20

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 64 64 64 64

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.804 0.804 0.804 0.80

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.993 0.993 0.993 0.993

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.61 29.55 29.52 29.56

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.27 1.23 1.17 1.22

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 48.255 49.302 50.308 49.288

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 98.59 103.84 105.63 102.69

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 44.965 45.416 46.144 45.508

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 49.3 52.8 53.8 52.0

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.32 2.49 2.53 2.45

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.9 5.2 5.2 5.1

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.951 0.948 0.948 0.949

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.0

%O2 Oxygen, % 18.2 18.2 18.2 18.2

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.70 80.90 80.70 80.77

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.90 28.87 28.90 28.89

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.37 28.31 28.34 28.34

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.66 29.60 29.57 29.61

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 553 555 565 557

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.406 0.389 0.373 0.389

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 47.9 47.0 46.3 47.1

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 5,089 5,226 4,957 5,091

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 10,425 10,632 10,268 10,442

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 96.8 100.2 104.4 100.5

Wp Production, tons rock charged to the cupola per hour

W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 19,800 19,000 20,000 19,600

Cmg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 1.6E+01 1.5E+01 1.5E+01 1.5E+01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.0E-01 2.8E-01 2.8E-01 2.9E-01

Elb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 70 29 35 45

Cmg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 5.5E-02 2.3E-02 2.7E-02 3.5E-02

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-03 4.3E-04 5.0E-04 6.7E-04

Elb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 238 129 136 168

Cmg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E-01 1.0E-01 1.0E-01 1.3E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.7E-03 1.9E-03 1.9E-03 2.5E-03

Elb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Int. Insulation Group 10-3990.14

Phenix City, AL

Stack Curing Oven

Personnel LEE
Plant Job #

Location OTM27/OTM 28 Testing

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/26/2010 10/26/2010 10/27/2010

Start Run Start Time 10:10:00 14:15:00 8:37:00

Run Finish Time 13:28:34 17:39:34 11:56:09

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 194.84 194.8 191.26 194

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.212 0.212 0.212 0.212

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.804 0.804 0.804 0.80

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.011 1.011 1.011 1.011

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.60 29.60 29.78 29.66

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 73.961 76.022 73.716 74.566

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 81.00 84.88 79.75 81.88

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 72.269 73.755 72.635 72.886

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 78.4 74.5 68.7 73.9

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 3.69 3.51 3.23 3.48

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.9 4.5 4.3 4.6

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.951 0.955 0.957 0.954

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.96 0.87 1.01 0.95

%O2 Oxygen, % 19.78 19.73 19.62 19.71

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.26 79.4 79.37 79.3

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.94 28.93 28.95 28.94

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.41 28.43 28.48 28.44

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O 0.3 0.30 0.20 0.27

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.62 29.62 29.79 29.68

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 192 190 201 195

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.332 0.336 0.334 0.334

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 34.7 34.9 34.9 34.8

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 57.6 57.6 57.6 57.6

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 92,480 91,367 91,730 91,859

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 120,492 119,839 120,483 120,272

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 95.6 95.8 98.1 96.5

Wp Production, tons rock charged to the cupola per hour

W Filterable PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 33.40 24.70 43.80 33.97

Cmg/dscm Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 1.6E+01 1.2E+01 2.1E+01 1.6E+01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.6E+00 4.1E+00 7.3E+00 5.7E+00

Elb/ton product Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Organic Condensible PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 1.7 3.5 1.7 2.3

Cmg/dscm Organic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 8.3E-01 1.7E+00 8.3E-01 1.1E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Organic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Organic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.8E-01 5.8E-01 2.8E-01 3.8E-01

Elb/ton product Organic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 39 47 49 45

Cmg/dscm Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E+01 2.3E+01 2.4E+01 2.2E+01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.5E+00 7.8E+00 8.2E+00 7.5E+00

Elb/ton product Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Total PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 74.1 75.2 94.5 81.3

Cmg/dscm Total PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 3.6E+01 3.6E+01 4.6E+01 3.9E+01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Total PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.2E+01 1.2E+01 1.6E+01 1.4E+01

Elb/ton product Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Intl. Insulation Group 10-3990.14

Phenix City, AL

Source Cupola

Personnel J Johnson
APPENDIX B 

PROCESS DATA 
APPENDIX C 

FIELD AND COMPUTER 

GENERATED DATA 

SHEETS AND NOTES 
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # OTM27-I Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # T5-2 Method OTM27/28 Total Points 12

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 16.24Source Cupola Delta ∆H@ Date 10/26/10 Time/reading 16.24Operator J Johnson Bws (%) 4.86 # of Ports Total Run min 194.84Filter Number Condensate Volume 60.3 Cp 0.804 Ps (in Hg) 29.62Barometric 29.60 Silica Gel Weight Gain 18.1 DGM Y 1.011 Pm (in Hg) 29.60 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) 0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.212 O2 (%) 19.78 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 8.563 An (ft^2) 0.00025 CO2 (%) 0.96 Md 28.94 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.41 Act. Flow (cfm) 119,839 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 72.25 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 0.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 96,032

Moisture % 4.86 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 91,367 . Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments:

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

6 0.0 12.7 10:10 483.37 0.20 193 75 77 0.4 2

5 12.7 29.4 10:22 488.01 0.35 191 77 76 0.4 24 29.4 47.1 10:39 494.26 0.39 195 82 77 0.4 23 47.1 64.6 10:57 500.62 0.38 196 83 78 0.4 22 64.6 81.1 11:14 507.01 0.34 193 84 79 0.4 21 81.1 95.3 11:31 513.20 0.25 195 84 78 0.4 2

1 95.3 109.7 11:49 518.83 0.26 194 82 80 0.4 22 109.7 126.2 12:03 525.06 0.34 192 83 80 0.4 23 126.2 144.4 12:19 531.63 0.41 193 86 81 0.4 24 144.4 161.8 12:38 538.33 0.38 180 85 81 0.4 25 161.8 178.8 12:55 544.76 0.36 192 86 82 0.4 26 178.8 194.8 13:12 550.98 0.32 194 86 82 0.4 2

194.8 13:28 557.33

Average: 73.96 0.33 192.3 82.8 79.3 #DIV/0! 0.40 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # OTM27-I Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # T5-2 Method OTM27/28 Total Points 12 0.000 @ 15"

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 16.3 0.000 @ 10"Source Cupola Delta ∆H@ Date 10/26/10 Time/reading 16.3Operator Johnson Bws (%) 4.5 # of Ports 2 Total Run 196.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 56.5 Cp 0.804 Ps (in Hg) 29.62Barometric 29.60 Silica Gel Weight Gain 18 DGM Y 1.011 Pm (in Hg) 29.60 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) 0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.212 O2 (%) 19.73 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 8.56 An (ft^2) 0.00025 CO2 (%) 0.87 Md 28.93 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.43 Act. Flow (cfm) 120,492 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 73.74 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 0.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 96,877

Moisture % 4.54 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 92,480

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

6 0.0 12.7 14:15 557.669 0.22 199 81 81 0.4 2

5 12.7 29.4 14:27 563.210 0.29 200 84 81 0.4 24 29.4 47.1 14:44 569.610 0.35 199 85 82 0.4 23 47.1 64.6 15:02 576.520 0.34 203 89 83 0.4 22 64.6 81.1 15:19 583.230 0.37 186 86 83 0.4 21 81.1 95.3 15:36 589.850 0.29 190 87 84 0.4 2

6 95.3 109.7 16:00 595.931 0.28 187 84 84 0.4 25 109.7 126.2 16:14 600.730 0.38 198 86 84 0.4 24 126.2 144.4 16:30 607.180 0.39 200 88 84 0.4 23 144.4 161.8 16:49 614.110 0.41 169 88 85 0.4 22 161.8 178.8 17:06 620.860 0.35 172 89 84 0.4 21 178.8 194.8 17:23 627.560 0.36 179 90 85 0.4 2

194.8 17:39 633.691

Average: 76.02 0.34 190.2 86.4 83.3 #DIV/0! 0.40 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # 53-10-1 Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # OTM27 - I Method OTM27/28 Total Points 12 0.000 @ 15"

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 15.9 0.000 @ 9.5"Source Cupola Delta ∆H@ Date 10/27/10 Time/reading 15.9Operator J Johnson Bws (%) 4.3 # of Ports 2 Total Run 191.3Filter Number Condensate Volume 50.9 Cp 0.804 Ps (in Hg) 29.79Barometric 29.78 Silica Gel Weight Gain 17.8 DGM Y 1.011 Pm (in Hg) 29.78 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) 0.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.212 O2 (%) 19.62 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 8.56 An (ft^2) 0.00025 CO2 (%) 1.01 Md 28.95 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.48 Act. Flow (cfm) 120,483 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 72.60 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 0.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 95,814

Moisture % 4.26 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 91,730

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 11.8 8:37 633.89 0.18 194 71 70 0.4 2

2 11.8 27.2 8:48 639.57 0.31 198 78 73 0.4 23 27.2 44.5 9:04 646.11 0.39 201 83 74 0.4 24 44.5 61.6 9:21 652.86 0.38 206 83 75 0.4 25 61.6 79.2 9:38 659.66 0.40 197 84 77 0.4 26 79.2 95.1 9:56 666.07 0.33 201 83 78 0.4 2

1 95.1 108.1 10:20 672.33 0.22 204 82 81 0.4 22 108.1 125.0 10:33 677.64 0.37 202 84 79 0.4 23 125.0 142.5 10:49 683.12 0.40 196 85 79 0.4 24 142.5 159.2 11:07 689.56 0.36 209 84 80 0.4 25 159.2 175.6 11:24 695.82 0.35 202 85 80 0.4 26 175.6 191.3 11:40 702.13 0.32 204 85 81 0.4 2

191.3 11:56 707.61

Average: 73.72 0.33 201.2 82.3 77.3 #DIV/0! 0.40 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # T5-10-1 Pollutant METALS Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # T5-1 Method 29 Total Points 12 15" 0.003

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.673 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 16.0 8" 0.000Source Cupola Delta ∆H@ Date 10/26/10 Time/reading 4.0Operator Luckett Bws (%) 4.80 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 113.9 Cp 0.805 Ps (in Hg) 29.62Barometric 29.60 Silica Gel Weight Gain 24.4 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.60 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) 0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.280 O2 (%) 19.78 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 8.563 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 0.96 Md 28.94 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.42 Act. Flow (cfm) 116,323 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 128.85 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 129.2 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 93,669

Moisture % 4.81 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 89,174

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 10:10 794.355 0.30 195 84 82 0.00 1.15 232 

1 4.0 8.0 10:14 797.96 0.28 195 80 78 0.00 1.1 241 1 8.0 12.0 10:18 799.65 0.31 196 83 78 0.00 1.2 243 1 12.0 16.0 10:22 802.37 0.30 192 86 77 0.00 1.15 241 2 16.0 20.0 10:26 805.13 0.35 198 89 78 0.00 1.35 241 2 20.0 24.0 10:30 807.99 0.34 197 90 78 0.00 1.3 250 2 24.0 28.0 10:34 811.05 0.34 195 91 78 0.00 1.3 239 2 28.0 32.0 10:38 813.84 0.34 197 93 79 0.00 1.3 239 3 32.0 36.0 10:42 816.85 0.35 195 93 79 0.00 1.35 247 3 36.0 40.0 10:46 819.75 0.35 197 93 80 0.00 1.35 247 3 40.0 44.0 10:50 822.55 0.34 198 94 80 0.00 1.3 246 3 44.0 48.0 10:54 825.6 0.37 194 95 81 0.00 1.4 241 4 48.0 52.0 10:58 828.64 0.35 195 96 82 0.00 1.35 240 4 52.0 56.0 11:02 831.55 0.35 199 97 83 0.00 1.35 237 4 56.0 60.0 11:06 834.38 0.34 191 97 83 0.00 1.3 241 4 60.0 64.0 11:10 837.33 0.35 193 97 84 0.00 1.35 236 5 64.0 68.0 11:14 840.22 0.32 194 96 85 0.00 1.25 253 5 68.0 72.0 11:18 843.25 0.31 192 97 84 0.00 1.2 251 5 72.0 76.0 11:22 846.06 0.31 190 98 85 0.00 1.2 247 5 76.0 80.0 11:26 848.8 0.31 189 98 85 0.00 1.2 245 6 80.0 84.0 11:30 851.81 0.22 188 99 86 0.00 0.85 240 6 84.0 88.0 11:34 854.15 0.22 181 99 86 0.00 0.85 241 6 88.0 92.0 11:38 856.46 0.22 184 100 87 0.00 0.85 253 6 92.0 96.0 11:42 858.75 0.22 189 100 88 0.00 0.85 238 1 96.0 100.0 11:51 861.293 0.26 184 97 90 0.00 1 237 1 100.0 104.0 11:55 863.72 0.25 188 95 89 0.00 0.97 241 1 104.0 108.0 11:59 866.54 0.25 186 97 88 0.00 0.97 246 1 108.0 112.0 12:03 869.21 0.25 189 99 88 0.00 0.97 248 2 112.0 116.0 12:07 872.36 0.31 191 100 88 0.00 1.2 251 2 116.0 120.0 12:11 873.9 0.31 191 100 88 0.00 1.2 246 2 120.0 124.0 12:15 876.6 0.31 189 100 89 0.00 1.2 237 2 124.0 128.0 12:19 879.4 0.34 192 100 88 0.00 1.3 241 3 128.0 132.0 12:23 882.3 0.34 195 100 89 0.00 1.3 245 3 132.0 136.0 12:27 885.25 0.34 190 100 88 0.00 1.3 244 3 136.0 140.0 12:31 888.35 0.34 187 100 89 0.00 1.3 243 3 140.0 144.0 12:35 891.46 0.33 188 100 89 0.00 1.25 242 4 144.0 148.0 12:39 894.25 0.38 169 101 90 0.00 1.5 241 4 148.0 152.0 12:43 897.21 0.38 168 101 90 0.00 1.5 245 4 152.0 156.0 12:47 900.4 0.40 162 100 91 0.00 1.55 253 4 156.0 160.0 12:51 903.52 0.36 186 100 90 0.00 1.4 252 5 160.0 164.0 12:55 906.63 0.32 192 100 91 0.00 1.25 253 5 164.0 168.0 12:59 909.21 0.32 192 101 91 0.00 1.25 251 5 168.0 172.0 13:03 912.11 0.36 184 102 91 0.00 1.4 253 5 172.0 176.0 13:07 915.45 0.36 166 102 91 0.00 1.4 251 6 176.0 180.0 13:11 918.46 0.25 180 102 92 0.00 0.97 243 6 180.0 184.0 13:15 921.1 0.24 193 102 91 0.00 0.93 240 6 184.0 188.0 13:19 923.4 0.26 191 103 92 0.00 1 250 6 188.0 192.0 13:23 926 0.24 193 104 92 0.00 0.93 243 

192.0 13:27 928.519

Average: 134.16 0.31 189.2 96.9 85.9 0.00 1.21 244 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # T5-10-1 Pollutant METALS Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # T5-1 Method 29 Total Points 12 14:15 17:36 16.0/0.000 10.0/0.000

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.675 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 16.0

Source Cupola Delta ∆H@ Date 10/26/10 Time/reading 4.0Operator Luckett Bws (%) 4.4 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 95.8 Cp 0.805 Ps (in Hg) 29.46Barometric 29.44 Silica Gel Weight Gain 29.6 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.44 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) 0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.280 O2 (%) 19.73 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 8.56 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 0.87 Md 28.93 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.45 Act. Flow (cfm) 116,911 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 129.35 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 129.6 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 95,146

Moisture % 4.36 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 91,003

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 14:15 929.297 0.22 188 87 87 0.00 0.85 243 

1 4.0 8.0 14:19 931.6 0.23 180 86 87 0.00 0.89 245 1 8.0 12.0 14:23 933.99 0.22 194 90 85 0.00 0.85 250 1 12.0 16.0 14:27 936.4 0.25 200 92 85 0.00 0.97 251 2 16.0 20.0 14:31 938.94 0.32 192 93 85 0.00 1.25 246 2 20.0 24.0 14:35 941.6 0.32 190 95 85 0.00 1.25 241 2 24.0 28.0 14:39 944 0.31 188 96 85 0.00 1.2 243 2 28.0 32.0 14:43 947.11 0.31 189 98 87 0.00 1.2 250 3 32.0 36.0 14:47 949.86 0.31 198 99 87 0.00 1.2 251 3 36.0 40.0 14:51 951.99 0.35 185 99 87 0.00 1.35 247 3 40.0 44.0 14:55 954.21 0.34 186 99 88 0.00 1.3 240 3 44.0 48.0 14:59 957.82 0.34 191 100 88 0.00 1.3 242 4 48.0 52.0 15:03 960.27 0.36 196 101 89 0.00 1.4 246 4 52.0 56.0 15:07 963.86 0.37 201 100 89 0.00 1.45 251 4 56.0 60.0 15:11 966.91 0.35 194 100 90 0.00 1.35 253 4 60.0 64.0 15:15 969.95 0.38 195 101 90 0.00 1.5 254 5 64.0 68.0 15:19 973.11 0.33 189 101 90 0.00 1.3 251 5 68.0 72.0 15:23 975.99 0.33 189 101 91 0.00 1.3 253 5 72.0 76.0 15:27 979.05 0.32 194 101 91 0.00 1.25 250 5 76.0 80.0 12:31 981.99 0.32 194 101 91 0.00 1.25 251 6 80.0 84.0 15:35 984.92 0.23 189 101 92 0.00 0.89 250 6 84.0 88.0 15:39 987.39 0.22 187 102 91 0.00 0.85 250 6 88.0 92.0 15:43 989.6 0.22 185 103 92 0.00 0.85 246 6 92.0 96.0 15:47 992.25 0.24 183 104 92 0.00 0.93 250 1 96.0 100.0 16:00 994.623 0.31 182 101 84 0.00 1.2 242 1 100.0 104.0 16:04 997.94 0.30 178 93 92 0.00 1.15 243 1 104.0 108.0 16:08 1000.03 0.31 168 96 92 0.00 1.2 241 1 108.0 112.0 16:12 1003.04 0.31 162 97 91 0.00 1.2 232 2 112.0 116.0 16:16 1005.88 0.33 165 99 91 0.00 1.3 239 2 116.0 120.0 16:20 1008.8 0.35 162 100 91 0.00 1.35 241 2 120.0 124.0 16:24 1011.68 0.36 158 101 91 0.00 1.4 246 2 124.0 128.0 16:28 1014.86 0.36 157 101 92 0.00 1.4 243 3 128.0 132.0 16:32 1017.82 0.36 157 101 91 0.00 1.4 238 3 132.0 136.0 16:36 1020.89 0.36 158 101 92 0.00 1.4 239 3 136.0 140.0 16:40 1023.92 0.38 153 102 92 0.00 1.45 240 3 140.0 144.0 16:44 1026.97 0.37 153 102 92 0.00 1.45 241 4 144.0 148.0 16:48 1030.18 0.36 151 102 93 0.00 1.4 241 4 148.0 152.0 16:52 1033.35 0.36 153 103 93 0.00 1.4 246 4 152.0 156.0 16:56 1036.19 0.35 166 103 93 0.00 1.35 239 4 156.0 160.0 17:00 1039.2 0.33 172 102 93 0.00 1.3 240 5 160.0 164.0 17:04 1041.59 0.32 173 102 94 0.00 1.25 252 5 164.0 168.0 17:08 1045.41 0.33 176 102 93 0.00 1.3 243 5 168.0 172.0 17:12 1048.22 0.33 182 102 94 0.00 1.3 240 5 172.0 176.0 17:16 1051 0.33 175 102 93 0.00 1.3 241 6 176.0 180.0 17:20 1053.94 0.32 175 102 94 0.00 1.25 240 6 180.0 184.0 17:24 1056.83 0.33 174 102 93 0.00 1.3 240 6 184.0 188.0 17:28 1059.71 0.33 178 102 94 0.00 1.3 239 6 188.0 192.0 17:32 1062.59 0.34 180 102 93 0.00 1.3 238 

192.0 17:36 1065.567

Average: 136.27 0.32 178.9 99.4 90.3 0.00 1.24 244.5 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # T5-10-1 Pollutant METALS Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # T5-1 Method 29 Total Points 12 8:37 11:56 16.0/0.000 12.0/0.000

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.698 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 16

Source Cupola Delta ∆H@ Date 10/27/10 Time/reading 4Operator Luckett Bws (%) 5.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 115.3 Cp 0.805 Ps (in Hg) 29.80Barometric 29.78 Silica Gel Weight Gain 34.6 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.78 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) 0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.280 O2 (%) 19.62 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 8.56 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 1.01 Md 28.95 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.40 Act. Flow (cfm) 119,355 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 133.62 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 134.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 94,751

Moisture % 5.02 Preliminary Ts (oF) 202 Est. Us (ft/s) 34.4 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 90,010

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3175 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 8:37 113.460 0.27 193 75 72 0.00 1.05 229 

1 4.0 8.0 8:41 116.02 0.27 193 75 72 0.00 1.05 230 1 8.0 12.0 8:45 119.46 0.27 195 84 73 0.00 1.05 229 1 12.0 16.0 8:49 121.05 0.27 192 86 74 0.00 1.05 229 2 16.0 20.0 8:05 123.78 0.32 198 89 75 0.00 1.25 231 2 20.0 24.0 8:57 126.82 0.32 198 91 75 0.00 1.25 234 2 24.0 28.0 9:01 129.66 0.32 197 92 75 0.00 1.25 233 2 28.0 32.0 9:05 132.02 0.32 193 92 75 0.00 1.25 230 3 32.0 36.0 9:09 134.65 0.38 171 93 76 0.00 1.45 229 3 36.0 40.0 9:13 137.88 0.38 184 93 76 0.00 1.45 232 3 40.0 44.0 9:17 140.69 0.38 189 93 77 0.00 1.45 233 3 44.0 48.0 9:21 143.64 0.38 198 94 78 0.00 1.45 232 4 48.0 52.0 9:25 147.71 0.38 207 95 78 0.00 1.45 234 4 52.0 56.0 9:29 149.81 0.38 203 95 78 0.00 1.45 231 4 56.0 60.0 9:33 152.53 0.38 200 96 79 0.00 1.45 230 4 60.0 64.0 9:37 156.21 0.38 205 96 80 0.00 1.45 229 5 64.0 68.0 9:41 158.64 0.34 208 96 80 0.00 1.3 231 5 68.0 72.0 9:45 161.29 0.34 207 96 81 0.00 1.3 231 5 72.0 76.0 9:49 164.19 0.34 203 97 82 0.00 1.3 234 5 76.0 80.0 9:53 167.82 0.34 204 97 82 0.00 1.3 232 6 80.0 84.0 9:57 170.04 0.23 200 97 83 0.00 0.89 230 6 84.0 88.0 10:01 172.42 0.23 200 97 84 0.00 0.89 231 6 88.0 92.0 10:05 174.47 0.23 196 97 84 0.00 0.89 234 6 92.0 96.0 10:09 177.31 0.23 216 97 84 0.00 0.89 232 1 96.0 100.0 10:20 179.685 0.33 205 90 86 0.00 1.25 229 1 100.0 104.0 10:24 182.36 0.33 205 90 85 0.00 1.25 232 1 104.0 108.0 10:28 185.61 0.33 209 92 85 0.00 1.25 231 1 108.0 112.0 10:32 188.3 0.33 208 94 85 0.00 1.25 235 2 112.0 116.0 10:36 190.99 0.38 205 95 86 0.00 1.45 237 2 116.0 120.0 10:40 194.41 0.38 211 96 86 0.00 1.45 236 2 120.0 124.0 10:44 197.53 0.38 205 96 86 0.00 1.45 236 2 124.0 128.0 10:48 200.95 0.38 214 95 86 0.00 1.45 230 3 128.0 132.0 10:52 204.17 0.38 180 95 87 0.00 1.45 231 3 132.0 136.0 10:56 208.69 0.38 213 96 87 0.00 1.45 229 3 136.0 140.0 11:00 211.28 0.38 214 97 87 0.00 1.45 230 3 140.0 144.0 11:04 213.84 0.38 220 97 87 0.00 1.45 230 4 144.0 148.0 11:08 217.02 0.35 214 97 87 0.00 1.35 229 4 148.0 152.0 11:12 220.22 0.35 210 98 87 0.00 1.35 232 4 152.0 156.0 11:16 223.35 0.35 218 98 87 0.00 1.35 232 4 156.0 160.0 11:20 226.25 0.35 216 98 88 0.00 1.35 230 5 160.0 164.0 11:24 229.30 0.30 215 98 88 0.00 1.15 228 5 164.0 168.0 11:28 232.58 0.30 215 97 88 0.00 1.15 227 5 168.0 172.0 11:32 235.91 0.30 215 97 88 0.00 1.15 226 5 172.0 176.0 11:36 238.08 0.30 204 98 88 0.00 1.15 229 6 176.0 180.0 11:40 240.86 0.23 213 98 88 0.00 0.89 231 6 180.0 184.0 11:44 243.31 0.23 204 98 88 0.00 0.89 22 6 184.0 188.0 11:48 245.7 0.23 180 98 88 0.00 0.89 231 6 188.0 192.0 11:52 248.14 0.23 176 98 88 0.00 0.89 229 

192.0 11:56 250.985

Average: 137.53 0.32 202.5 94.1 82.5 0.00 1.24 226.7 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 2

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (L/m) 1 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source Cupola Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 28-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator JONES Bws (%) # of Ports 2 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 29.81

Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) 0.2 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 19.76 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 8.563 An (ft^2) 57.58930 CO2 (%) 1.12 Md 28.97 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.97 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

9:15:00 AM 0.0 183 1 1 3 4 121.934 0.887 77 76 9:20:00 AM 5.0 183 1 1 3 4 126.820 5.430 78 77 9:25:00 AM 10.0 185 1 1 3 4 132.230 9.840 80 79 9:30:00 AM 15.0 186 1 1 3 4 137.670 14.050 81 80 9:35:00 AM 20.0 183 1 1 3 4 142.920 18.350 83 80 9:40:00 AM 25.0 186 1 1 3 4 148.390 23.050 84 80 9:45:00 AM 30.0 186 1 1 3 4 153.930 28.490 84 81 9:50:00 AM 35.0 185 1 1 3 4 159.410 33.950 85 82 9:55:00 AM 40.0 186 1 1 3 4 164.950 39.370 86 82 

10:00:00 AM 45.0 186 1 1 3 4 170.490 44.820 87 83 10:05:00 AM 50.0 186 1 1 3 4 175.510 50.070 87 83 10:10:00 AM 55.0 186 1 1 3 4.5 180.730 55.300 87 83 10:15:00 AM 60.0 186 1 1 3 4.5 185.770 60.560 87 84 10:20:00 AM 65.0 187 1 1 3 4.5 190.890 65.800 88 84 10:25:00 AM 70.0 187 1 1 3.5 4.5 196.010 71.050 88 84 10:30:00 AM 75.0 188 1 1 3.5 4.5 201.150 76.300 88 85 10:35:00 AM 80.0 188 1 1 3.5 4.5 206.210 81.540 89 85 10:40:00 AM 85.0 188 1 1 3.5 4.5 211.590 86.890 89 85 10:45:00 AM 90.0 186 1 1 4 4.5 216.970 92.100 89 86 10:50:00 AM 95.0 187 1 1 4 4.5 222.230 97.370 89 86 10:55:00 AM 100.0 188 1 1 4 4.5 227.660 102.650 89 87 11:00:00 AM 105.0 188 1 1 4 4.5 233.440 107.890 89 87 11:05:00 AM 110.0 189 1 1 4 5 239.220 114.160 88 87 11:10:00 AM 115.0 189 1 1.5 4 5 245.020 121.431 88 87 11:15:00 AM 120.0 251.164 126.704

Average 120.0 186.3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 85.83333333 83.04166667 84

Volume 129.230 125.817

dscm 0.12 0.12

Trap/ Probe Temp 

20.0"@0.00 18.0"@0.00 17.0"@0.0

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test Pre Tes
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 2

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (L/m) 1 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source Cupola Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 28-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator JONES Bws (%) # of Ports 2 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 29.83

Barometric 29.82 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y 0.991 Pm (in Hg) 29.82 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) 0.2 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 19.76 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 8.56 An (ft^2) 57.58930 CO2 (%) 1.13 Md 28.97 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.97 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

11:35:00 AM 0.0 188 1 1 3 2.5 0.893 0.632 85 84 11:40:00 AM 5.0 188 1 1 3 2.5 6.710 5.850 85 84 11:45:00 AM 10.0 187 1 1 3 2.5 12.670 11.070 85 84 11:50:00 AM 15.0 186 1 1 3 2.5 18.540 16.230 86 84 11:55:00 AM 20.0 185 1 1 3 2.5 24.610 21.510 86 85 12:00:00 PM 25.0 184 1 1 3 2.5 30.770 26.790 87 85 12:05:00 PM 30.0 182 1 1 3 2.5 36.990 32.070 87 85 12:10:00 PM 35.0 182 1 1 3 2.5 43.140 37.350 88 85 12:15:00 PM 40.0 181 1 1 3 3 49.190 42.630 88 86 12:20:00 PM 45.0 181 1 1 3 3 55.810 48.170 88 86 12:25:00 PM 50.0 180 1 1 3 3 62.140 53.850 89 87 12:30:00 PM 55.0 182 1 1 3 3 66.780 57.790 89 87 12:35:00 PM 60.0 181 1 1 3 3 72.410 62.880 90 87 12:40:00 PM 65.0 181 1 1 3 3 78.050 67.970 90 87 12:45:00 PM 70.0 179 1 1 3 3 83.660 73.060 90 87 12:50:00 PM 75.0 179 1 1 3 3 89.310 78.140 90 87 12:55:00 PM 80.0 180 1 1 3 3 94.680 83.480 90 87 

1:00:00 PM 85.0 180 1 1 3 3 99.130 88.310 91 88 1:05:00 PM 90.0 180 1 1 3 3 103.540 93.140 91 88 1:10:00 PM 95.0 180 1 1 3 3.5 107.960 97.990 91 88 1:15:00 PM 100.0 180 1 1 3 3.5 112.360 102.790 91 88 1:20:00 PM 105.0 180 1 1 3 3.5 116.830 108.030 91 88 1:25:00 PM 110.0 180 1 1 3 3.5 121.230 113.650 91 89 1:30:00 PM 115.0 180 1 1 3 3.5 125.630 119.180 91 89 1:35:00 PM 120.0 180 130.163 124.712

Average 120.0 181.8 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 88.75 86.46 

Volume 129.270 124.080

dscm 0.12 0.12

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test Pre Tes

17.0"@0.00 8.0"@0.00 16.5"@0.0

Trap/ Probe Temp
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 2

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (L/m) 1 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source Cupola Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 28-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator JONES Bws (%) # of Ports 2 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 29.93

Barometric 29.92 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y Pm (in Hg) 29.92 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) 0.2 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 19.76 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 8.56 An (ft^2) 57.58930 CO2 (%) 1.13 Md 28.97 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.97 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

1:50:00 PM 0.0 179 1 1 3 2 0.315 0.476 90 81 1:55:00 PM 5.0 180 1 1 3 2 5.360 5.690 90 81 2:00:00 PM 10.0 181 1 1 3 2 10.399 10.890 91 82 2:05:00 PM 15.0 181 1 1 3 2 15.440 15.960 91 82 2:10:00 PM 20.0 182 1 1 3 2 20.480 21.040 91 82 2:15:00 PM 25.0 182 1 1 3 2 25.520 26.090 91 82 2:20:00 PM 30.0 183 1 1 3 2 30.560 31.150 91 82 2:25:00 PM 35.0 183 1 1 3 2 35.600 36.170 91 82 2:30:00 PM 40.0 184 1 1 3 2 40.540 41.170 91 82 2:35:00 PM 45.0 184 1 1 3.5 3 45.850 46.460 91 82 2:40:00 PM 50.0 184 1 1 3.5 3 51.100 51.710 91 82 2:45:00 PM 55.0 183 1 1 3.5 3 56.360 57.010 91 82 2:50:00 PM 60.0 182 1 1 4 3 61.610 62.230 91 82 2:55:00 PM 65.0 182 1 1 4 3 66.860 67.460 91 82 3:00:00 PM 70.0 180 1 1 4 3 72.140 72.670 92 83 3:05:00 PM 75.0 179 1 1 4 3 77.420 77.890 93 84 3:10:00 PM 80.0 177 1 1 4 3 82.700 83.110 94 84 3:15:00 PM 85.0 177 1 1 4 3 87.970 88.310 95 85 3:20:00 PM 90.0 176 1 1 4 3 93.310 93.520 94 85 3:25:00 PM 95.0 176 1 1 4 3 98.790 98.920 94 84 3:30:00 PM 100.0 177 1 1 4 3 103.930 103.890 94 84 3:35:00 PM 105.0 177 1 1 4 3 109.210 109.850 94 83 3:40:00 PM 110.0 179 1 1 4 3 114.470 114.280 93 83 3:45:00 PM 115.0 180 1 1 4 3 119.760 119.500 93 83 3:50:00 PM 120.0 125.021 124.533

Average 120.0 180.3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 92 82.67 

Volume 124.706 124.057

dscm 0.12 0.12

Trap/ Probe Temp 

18.0"@0.00 9.0"@0.00 20.0"@0.0

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test Pre Tes
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # T5-10-1 Pollutant Haxavalent Chromium Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # T5-2 Method 0061 Total Points 12 12:30 15:40 15.5/0.002 7.5/

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.727 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 15.0

Source Cupola Delta ∆H@ Date 10/27/10 Time/reading 5.0Operator JOHNSON/LUCKETTBws (%) 4.49 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 101.5 Cp 0.805 Ps (in Hg) 29.74Barometric 29.73 Silica Gel Weight Gain 29.2 DGM Y 1.011 Pm (in Hg) 29.84 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) 0.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.293 O2 (%) 19.84 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 8.563 An (ft^2) 0.00047 CO2 (%) 1.01 Md 28.96 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.45 Ms 28.46 Act. Flow (cfm) 117,659 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 130.53 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 130.9 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 93,674

Moisture % 4.50 Preliminary Ts (oF) 189 Est. Us (ft/s) 34.1 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 89,470

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3151 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 5.0 12:30 708.661 0.23 198 78 79 0.00 1.05 2

1 5.0 10.0 12:35 711.92 0.23 200 79 79 0.00 1.05 21 10.0 15.0 12:40 715.13 0.23 203 81 79 0.00 1.05 22 15.0 20.0 12:45 718.391 0.33 209 83 79 0.00 1.5 22 20.0 25.0 12:50 722.21 0.33 208 83 79 0.00 1.5 22 25.0 30.0 12:55 726.16 0.33 203 85 79 0.00 1.5 23 30.0 35.0 13:00 729.75 0.35 196 86 79 0.00 1.6 23 35.0 40.0 13:05 733.68 0.35 194 86 79 0.00 1.6 23 40.0 45.0 13:10 737.12 0.35 192 88 80 0.00 1.6 24 45.0 50.0 13:15 741.62 0.41 190 89 81 0.00 1.85 24 50.0 55.0 13:20 745.07 0.41 197 88 81 0.00 1.85 24 55.0 60.0 13:25 750.41 0.41 193 87 81 0.00 1.85 25 60.0 65.0 13:30 754.14 0.37 197 88 81 0.00 1.65 25 65.0 70.0 13:35 758.25 0.37 199 87 81 0.00 1.65 25 70.0 75.0 13:40 762.26 0.37 204 88 81 0.00 1.65 26 75.0 80.0 13:45 766.40 0.29 200 87 81 0.00 1.3 26 80.0 85.0 13:50 769.97 0.29 202 87 81 0.00 1.3 26 85.0 90.0 13:55 773.40 0.29 200 87 81 0.00 1.3 21 90.0 95.0 14:10 777.052 0.32 203 82 79 0.00 1.45 21 95.0 100.0 14:15 781.11 0.32 201 84 81 0.00 1.45 21 100.0 105.0 14:20 784.63 0.32 200 85 81 0.00 1.45 22 105.0 110.0 14:25 788.12 0.34 197 87 81 0.00 1.55 22 110.0 115.0 14:30 792.27 0.34 197 87 81 0.00 1.55 22 115.0 120.0 14:35 796.12 0.34 194 87 81 0.00 1.55 23 120.0 125.0 14:40 799.54 0.37 202 88 81 0.00 1.65 23 125.0 130.0 14:45 802.98 0.37 201 88 82 0.00 1.65 23 130.0 135.0 14:50 806.99 0.37 202 88 82 0.00 1.65 24 135.0 140.0 14:55 811.27 0.33 200 88 82 0.00 1.5 24 140.0 145.0 15:00 812.11 0.33 195 89 82 0.00 1.5 24 145.0 150.0 15:05 819.41 0.33 197 89 83 0.00 1.5 25 150.0 155.0 15:10 822.58 0.32 193 89 83 0.00 1.45 25 155.0 160.0 15:15 826.81 0.32 191 89 82 0.00 1.45 25 160.0 165.0 15:20 830.42 0.32 192 89 83 0.00 1.45 26 165.0 170.0 15:25 834.07 0.16 208 88 82 0.00 0.73 26 170.0 175.0 15:30 836.77 0.16 208 89 83 0.00 0.73 26 175.0 180.0 15:35 839.41 0.16 209 89 83 0.00 0.73 2

180.0 15:40 842.386

Average: 133.73 0.32 199.3 86.4 80.9 0.00 1.44 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # T5-10-1 Pollutant Haxavalent Chromium Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # T5-2 Method 0061 Total Points 12 9:15 12:21 15.0/0.010 9.0/

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.736 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 15.0

Source Cupola Delta ∆H@ Date 10/28/10 Time/reading 5.0Operator LUCKETT Bws (%) 4.6 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 109.7 Cp 0.805 Ps (in Hg) 29.93Barometric 29.92 Silica Gel Weight Gain 26.2 DGM Y 1.011 Pm (in Hg) 30.03 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) 0.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.293 O2 (%) 19.76 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 8.56 An (ft^2) 0.00047 CO2 (%) 1.12 Md 28.97 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.45 Ms 28.46 Act. Flow (cfm) 114,476 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 132.20 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 132.5 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 93,777

Moisture % 4.62 Preliminary Ts (oF) 189 Est. Us (ft/s) 34.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 89,461

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3158 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 5.0 9:15 843.144 0.36 182 71 67 0.00 1.65 2

1 5.0 10.0 9:20 847.01 0.36 181 71 69 0.00 1.65 21 10.0 15.0 9:25 850.8 0.36 183 74 70 0.00 1.65 22 15.0 20.0 9:30 854.82 0.34 188 76 71 0.00 1.55 22 20.0 25.0 9:35 856.64 0.31 189 77 72 0.00 1.4 22 25.0 30.0 9:40 862.42 0.31 187 77 70 0.00 1.4 23 30.0 35.0 9:45 866.19 0.33 188 79 74 0.00 1.5 23 35.0 40.0 9:50 869.95 0.36 184 76 73 0.00 1.65 23 40.0 45.0 9:55 873.6 0.35 186 79 72 0.00 1.6 24 45.0 50.0 10:00 877.78 0.34 182 82 74 0.00 1.55 24 50.0 55.0 10:05 881.49 0.35 180 80 75 0.00 1.6 24 55.0 60.0 10:10 885.66 0.33 183 78 74 0.00 1.5 25 60.0 65.0 10:15 889.53 0.31 186 81 74 0.00 1.4 25 65.0 70.0 10:20 893.43 0.31 185 82 75 0.00 1.4 25 70.0 75.0 10:25 897.17 0.31 185 83 76 0.00 1.4 26 75.0 80.0 10:30 900.90 0.22 179 81 77 0.00 1 26 80.0 85.0 10:35 904.01 0.20 177 86 75 0.00 0.91 26 85.0 90.0 10:40 907.00 0.20 180 86 76 0.00 0.91 21 90.0 95.0 10:51 909.968 0.25 189 78 75 0.00 1.15 21 95.0 100.0 10:56 913.32 0.26 191 78 76 0.00 1.2 21 100.0 105.0 11:01 916.90 0.27 195 78 76 0.00 1.2 22 105.0 110.0 11:06 920.40 0.31 198 81 77 0.00 1.4 22 110.0 115.0 11:11 924.29 0.31 194 84 76 0.00 1.4 22 115.0 120.0 11:16 927.8 0.31 190 82 75 0.00 1.4 23 120.0 125.0 11:21 931.55 0.32 189 86 76 0.00 1.45 23 125.0 130.0 11:26 935.31 0.32 187 85 75 0.00 1.45 23 130.0 135.0 11:31 939.06 0.33 185 85 76 0.00 1.5 24 135.0 140.0 11:36 943.01 0.35 182 85 76 0.00 1.6 24 140.0 145.0 11:41 946.66 0.35 180 83 77 0.00 1.6 24 145.0 150.0 11:46 950.56 0.36 183 84 75 0.00 1.65 25 150.0 155.0 11:51 954.5 0.32 185 81 77 0.00 1.45 25 155.0 160.0 11:56 958.31 0.32 188 85 78 0.00 1.45 25 160.0 165.0 12:01 961.99 0.33 185 84 77 0.00 1.5 26 165.0 170.0 12:06 966 0.25 178 85 78 0.00 1.15 26 170.0 175.0 12:11 969.3 0.24 176 85 77 0.00 1.1 26 175.0 180.0 12:16 972.81 0.24 175 86 78 0.00 1.1 2

180.0 12:21 976.268

Average: 133.12 0.31 184.9 80.9 74.7 0.00 1.40 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # T5-10-1 Pollutant Haxavalent Chromium Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # T5-2 Method 0061 Total Points 12 12:40 15:45 15.0/0.003 8.0/

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.727 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 15.0

Source Cupola Delta ∆H@ Date 10/28/10 Time/reading 5.0Operator LUCKETT Bws (%) 4.6 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 107.3 Cp 0.805 Ps (in Hg) 29.95Barometric 29.94 Silica Gel Weight Gain 25.9 DGM Y 1.011 Pm (in Hg) 30.05 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) 0.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.293 O2 (%) 19.76 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 8.56 An (ft^2) 0.00047 CO2 (%) 1.13 Md 28.97 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.45 Ms 28.47 Act. Flow (cfm) 112,633 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 130.16 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 130.9 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 92,408

Moisture % 4.60 Preliminary Ts (oF) 189 Est. Us (ft/s) 34.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 88,173

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3159 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 5.0 12:40 976.618 0.28 185 77 76 0.00 1.25 2

1 5.0 10.0 12:45 980.55 0.28 188 78 75 0.00 1.25 21 10.0 15.0 12:50 984.1 0.27 187 78 76 0.00 1.2 22 15.0 20.0 12:55 987.13 0.32 191 82 78 0.00 1.45 22 20.0 25.0 13:00 990.84 0.33 190 85 76 0.00 1.5 22 25.0 30.0 13:05 994.62 0.33 193 83 76 0.00 1.5 23 30.0 35.0 13:10 998.44 0.35 190 83 76 0.00 1.6 23 35.0 40.0 13:15 1002.41 0.34 188 85 77 0.00 1.55 23 40.0 45.0 13:20 1006.28 0.35 191 84 75 0.00 1.6 24 45.0 50.0 13:25 1010.27 0.36 187 86 77 0.00 1.65 24 50.0 55.0 13:30 1014.18 0.35 184 85 77 0.00 1.6 24 55.0 60.0 13:35 1018.23 0.35 182 86 78 0.00 1.6 25 60.0 65.0 13:40 1022.05 0.34 180 84 78 0.00 1.55 25 65.0 70.0 13:45 1025.88 0.32 178 84 78 0.00 1.45 25 70.0 75.0 13:50 1029.81 0.33 177 85 76 0.00 1.5 26 75.0 80.0 13:55 1033.70 0.22 173 84 78 0.00 1 26 80.0 85.0 14:00 1036.86 0.22 175 85 77 0.00 1 26 85.0 90.0 14:05 1039.99 0.22 172 85 77 0.00 1 21 90.0 95.0 14:15 1043.371 0.28 185 82 79 0.00 1.25 21 95.0 100.0 14:20 1046.82 0.28 184 82 77 0.00 1.25 21 100.0 105.0 14:25 1050.37 0.29 189 81 78 0.00 1.3 22 105.0 110.0 14:30 1053.66 0.32 181 86 77 0.00 1.45 22 110.0 115.0 14:35 1057.69 0.20 178 88 78 0.00 0.91 22 115.0 120.0 14:40 1060.59 0.29 179 88 79 0.00 1.3 23 120.0 125.0 14:45 1064.24 0.30 183 85 78 0.00 1.35 23 125.0 130.0 14:50 1067.92 0.37 187 85 79 0.00 1.65 23 130.0 135.0 14:55 1072.16 0.37 184 87 80 0.00 1.65 24 135.0 140.0 15:00 1076.3 0.33 186 87 82 0.00 1.5 24 140.0 145.0 15:05 1079.55 0.32 188 86 80 0.00 1.45 24 145.0 150.0 15:10 1083.7 0.32 187 85 79 0.00 1.45 25 150.0 155.0 15:15 1087.56 0.29 189 89 78 0.00 1.3 25 155.0 160.0 15:20 1091.45 0.29 192 89 79 0.00 1.3 25 160.0 165.0 15:25 1095.4 0.29 190 85 80 0.00 1.3 26 165.0 170.0 15:30 1099.04 0.22 182 87 83 0.00 1 26 170.0 175.0 15:35 1102.83 0.22 180 88 84 0.00 1 26 175.0 180.0 15:40 1105.71 0.22 180 89 85 0.00 1 2

180.0 15:45 1108.487

Average: 131.87 0.30 184.3 84.7 78.2 0.00 1.35 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # T5-10-1 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # T5-1 Method M26A Total Points 12 17 0.003

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.699 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 5.0 10 0.001

Source Cupola (stack 101)Delta ∆H@ Date 10/26/10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator Luckett Bws (%) 4.60 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 31.9 Cp 0.805 Ps (in Hg) 29.48

Barometric 29.46 Silica Gel Weight Gain 11 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.46 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) 0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.28 O2 (%) 19.80 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 8.563 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 0.90 Md 28.94 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.43 Act. Flow (cfm) 116,224 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 41.82 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 41.9 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 94,889

Moisture % 4.61 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 90,528

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch"

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp. 

(*F)

Filter Temp 

(*F)

Imp temp. 

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 5.0 18:01 66.416 0.28 179 89 90 0.00 1.1 256 250 69 5

2 5.0 10.0 18:06 69.90 0.32 181 90 90 0.00 1.25 250 248 66 5

3 10.0 15.0 18:11 73.32 0.36 175 93 88 0.00 1.4 265 256 62 6

4 15.0 20.0 18:16 77.18 0.36 178 95 88 0.00 1.4 267 260 62 6

5 20.0 25.0 18:21 80.98 0.32 175 96 87 0.00 1.25 265 261 62 6

6 25.0 30.0 18:26 83.50 0.31 182 98 86 0.00 1.2 263 260 65 6

1 30.0 35.0 18:38 88.528 0.22 178 93 89 0.00 0.85 266 263 73 4

2 35.0 40.0 18:43 91.75 0.31 190 93 88 0.00 1.2 257 255 68 5

3 40.0 45.0 18:48 95.33 0.36 165 96 88 0.00 1.4 252 256 66 6

4 45.0 50.0 18:53 99.18 0.36 161 97 87 0.00 1.4 261 253 65 6

5 50.0 55.0 18:58 102.39 0.32 174 99 88 0.00 1.25 262 257 63 6

6 55.0 60.0 19:03 106.80 0.27 189 100 87 0.00 1.05 263 260 66 5

60.0 19:08 110.177

Average: 43.76 0.32 177.3 94.9 88.0 0.00 1.23 261 257 65.5833333 6

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # T5-10-1 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # T5-1 Method M26A Total Points 12 14:45 15:48 14.0/0.000 12.0/0.000

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.699 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 5.0

Source Cupola (stack 101)Delta ∆H@ Date 10/27/10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator LUCKETT Bws (%) 5.3 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 43.5 Cp 0.805 Ps (in Hg) 29.74

Barometric 29.73 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.73 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) 0.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.280 O2 (%) 19.84 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 8.56 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 1.01 Md 28.96 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.37 Act. Flow (cfm) 120,510 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 43.67 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 41.9 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 95,170

Moisture % 5.36 Preliminary Ts (oF) 202 Est. Us (ft/s) 34.5 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 90,087

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3179 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch"

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp. 

(*F)

Filter Temp 

(*F)

Imp temp. 

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 5.0 12:30 251.746 0.30 202 87 88 0.00 1.25 267 242 67 6

2 5.0 10.0 12:35 254.98 0.32 202 87 88 0.00 1.35 265 245 65 6

3 10.0 15.0 12:40 258.28 0.32 205 88 88 0.00 1.35 261 247 61 6

4 15.0 20.0 12:45 262.61 0.36 207 90 88 0.00 1.5 262 249 58 6

5 20.0 25.0 12:50 266.71 0.34 213 92 88 0.00 1.4 260 252 57 6

6 25.0 30.0 12:55 270.86 0.34 211 93 88 0.00 1.4 258 253 57 6

1 30.0 35.0 14:10 275.285 0.30 213 84 84 0.00 1.25 244 241 64 6

2 35.0 40.0 14:15 278.72 0.28 212 86 83 0.00 1.15 243 239 57 6

3 40.0 45.0 14:20 282.17 0.38 206 90 82 0.00 1.6 246 246 57 6

4 45.0 50.0 14:25 286.16 0.35 200 91 83 0.00 1.45 247 250 56 6

5 50.0 55.0 14:30 289.95 0.33 189 92 83 0.00 1.4 244 251 58 6

6 55.0 60.0 14:35 293.73 0.30 196 92 83 0.00 1.25 242 249 59 6

60.0 14:40 296.705

Average: 44.96 0.33 204.7 89.3 85.5 0.00 1.36 253.3 247.0 59.7 6

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # T5-10-1 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Intl. Insulation GroupDGM # T5-1 Method M26A Total Points 12 14:45 15:48 14.0/0.000 12.0/0.000

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.699 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 5.0

Source Cupola (stack 101)Delta ∆H@ Date 10/27/10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator LUCKETT Bws (%) 5.1 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 39.4 Cp 0.805 Ps (in Hg) 29.67

Barometric 29.66 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9.1 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.66 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) 0.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.28 O2 (%) 19.84 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 8.56 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 1.01 Md 28.96 Stack Area (sf) 57.59

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.40 Act. Flow (cfm) 120,538 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 42.62 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 41.9 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 94,743

Moisture % 5.08 Preliminary Ts (oF) 202 Est. Us (ft/s) 34.5 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 89,939

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3173 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch"

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp. 

(*F)

Filter Temp 

(*F)

Imp temp. 

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 5.0 14:45 297.162 0.28 202 93 85 0.00 1.15 241 244 69 6

2 5.0 10.0 14:50 300.52 0.30 209 95 85 0.00 1.25 245 241 64 6

3 10.0 15.0 14:55 303.96 0.35 211 96 85 0.00 1.45 248 242 62 6

4 15.0 20.0 15:00 307.83 0.38 210 99 86 0.00 1.6 252 247 59 6

5 20.0 25.0 15:05 311.70 0.38 207 100 86 0.00 1.6 249 244 57 6

6 25.0 30.0 15:10 315.65 0.36 212 100 86 0.00 1.5 248 245 57 6

1 30.0 35.0 15:18 319.735 0.23 204 97 87 0.00 0.92 243 238 61 6

2 35.0 40.0 15:23 322.81 0.28 197 97 87 0.00 1.15 242 240 58 6

3 40.0 45.0 15:28 325.08 0.33 203 99 87 0.00 1.4 243 240 55 6

4 45.0 50.0 15:33 330.07 0.38 205 99 87 0.00 1.6 244 251 57 6

5 50.0 55.0 15:38 334.10 0.35 210 100 87 0.00 1.45 249 256 57 6

6 55.0 60.0 15:43 337.98 0.30 205 100 87 0.00 1.25 249 259 58 6

60.0 15:48 341.518

Average: 44.36 0.33 206.3 97.9 86.3 0.00 1.36 246.1 245.6 59.5 6.0

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # T5-3-2 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 8 Start Finish Pre P

Company Int. Insulation GroupDGM # 50-2 Method 316 Total Points 16 9:01 10:14 15.0/0.000 10.0

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.707 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 4.0

Source Curing Oven Delta ∆H@ Date 26-Oct-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator LEE Bws (%) 4.91 # of Ports 2 Total Run 64.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 32.7 Cp 0.804 Ps (in Hg) 29.66Barometric 29.61 Silica Gel Weight Gain 16.6 DGM Y 0.993 Pm (in Hg) 29.61 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) 0.7 Actual Dn (in) 0.308 O2 (%) 18.2 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.17 An (ft^2) 0.00052 CO2 (%) 1.1 Md 28.90 Stack Area (sf) 3.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.37 Act. Flow (cfm) 10,632 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 44.90 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.44 Total Vol.(cf) 45.2 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 5,496

Moisture % 4.91 Preliminary Ts (oF) 550 Est. Us (ft/s) 50.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 5,226

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3255 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 4.0 9:01 914.875 0.40 557 88 86 0.00 1.15 2

2 4.0 8.0 9:05 917.62 0.38 555 91 84 0.00 1.15 23 8.0 12.0 9:09 920.69 0.38 553 98 86 0.00 1.2 24 12.0 16.0 9:13 923.81 0.38 554 100 86 0.00 1.2 25 16.0 20.0 9:17 926.96 0.43 552 104 87 0.00 1.35 26 20.0 24.0 9:21 929.91 0.41 549 109 89 0.00 1.3 27 24.0 28.0 9:25 933.17 0.48 544 110 89 0.00 1.5 28 28.0 32.0 9:29 936.72 0.50 550 112 91 0.00 1.6 21 32.0 36.0 9:42 939.123 0.28 549 100 93 0.00 0.89 22 36.0 40.0 9:46 942.07 0.33 551 106 93 0.00 1.05 23 40.0 44.0 9:50 945.53 0.38 555 110 94 0.00 1.2 24 44.0 48.0 9:54 948.61 0.38 552 112 94 0.00 1.2 25 48.0 52.0 9:58 951.45 0.43 553 113 94 0.00 1.35 26 52.0 56.0 10:02 954.66 0.45 558 115 95 0.00 1.4 27 56.0 60.0 10:06 958.01 0.44 556 118 95 0.00 1.4 28 60.0 64.0 10:10 960.82 0.44 553 118 95 0.00 1.4 2

64.0 10:14 963.130

Average: 48.26 0.41 552.6 106.5 90.7 0.00 1.27 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # T5-3-2 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 8 Start Finish Pre P

Company Int. Insulation GroupDGM # 50-2 Method 316 Total Points 16 11:07 12:17 15.0/0.000 12.0

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.715 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 4.0

Source Curing Oven Delta ∆H@ Date 26-Oct-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator LEE Bws (%) 5.2 # of Ports 2 Total Run 64.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 42.1 Cp 0.804 Ps (in Hg) 29.60Barometric 29.55 Silica Gel Weight Gain 10.7 DGM Y 0.993 Pm (in Hg) 29.55 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) 0.7 Actual Dn (in) 0.308 O2 (%) 18.2 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.17 An (ft^2) 0.00052 CO2 (%) 0.90 Md 28.87 Stack Area (sf) 3.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.31 Act. Flow (cfm) 10,425 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd #REF! Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 45.8 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 5,368

Moisture % #REF! Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 5,089

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 4.0 11:07 963.570 0.27 552 95 95 0.00 0.86 2

2 4.0 8.0 11:11 966.58 0.34 550 98 94 0.00 1.05 23 8.0 12.0 11:15 969.63 0.34 557 100 95 0.00 1.05 24 12.0 16.0 11:19 972.71 0.34 553 103 95 0.00 1.05 25 16.0 20.0 11:23 975.83 0.39 557 105 96 0.00 1.25 26 20.0 24.0 11:27 978.91 0.40 559 108 97 0.00 1.25 27 24.0 28.0 11:31 982.60 0.43 554 111 97 0.00 1.35 28 28.0 32.0 11:35 985.94 0.61 547 115 98 0.00 1.95 21 32.0 36.0 11:45 989.150 0.37 555 110 99 0.00 1.15 22 36.0 40.0 11:49 992.48 0.38 554 113 99 0.00 1.2 23 40.0 44.0 11:53 995.80 0.40 554 115 99 0.00 1.25 24 44.0 48.0 11:57 998.74 0.39 557 116 100 0.00 1.25 25 48.0 52.0 12:01 1001.90 0.39 558 117 100 0.00 1.25 26 52.0 56.0 12:05 1005.11 0.42 557 117 100 0.00 1.35 27 56.0 60.0 12:09 1008.07 0.42 556 118 100 0.00 1.35 28 60.0 64.0 12:13 1010.89 0.33 552 118 100 0.00 1.05 2

64.0 12:17 1012.872

Average: 49.30 0.39 554.5 109.9 97.8 0.00 1.23 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.14 Probe # 54-5-4 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 8 Start Finish Pre P

Company Int. Insulation GroupDGM # T4-3 Method 316 Total Points 16 13:55 15:07 15.0/0.000 13.0

Location Phenix City, AL Rate (cfm) 0.726 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 4.0

Source Curing Oven Delta ∆H@ Date 26-Oct-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator LEE Bws (%) 5.2 # of Ports 2 Total Run 64.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 41 Cp 0.804 Ps (in Hg) 29.57Barometric 29.52 Silica Gel Weight Gain 12.8 DGM Y 0.993 Pm (in Hg) 29.52 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) 0.7 Actual Dn (in) 0.308 O2 (%) 18.2 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.17 An (ft^2) 0.00052 CO2 (%) 1.1 Md 28.90 Stack Area (sf) 3.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.34 Act. Flow (cfm) 10,268 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd #REF! Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.44 Total Vol.(cf) 46.5 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 5,230

Moisture % #REF! Preliminary Ts (oF) 550 Est. Us (ft/s) 50.1 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 4,957

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3256 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 4.0 13:55 14.050 0.38 580 97 96 0.00 1.2 2

2 4.0 8.0 13:59 17.27 0.34 574 99 96 0.00 1.05 23 8.0 12.0 14:03 20.32 0.34 571 99 97 0.00 1.05 24 12.0 16.0 14:07 23.51 0.36 569 103 99 0.00 1.15 25 16.0 20.0 14:11 26.49 0.34 568 109 99 0.00 1.05 26 20.0 24.0 14:15 29.57 0.32 567 111 99 0.00 1 27 24.0 28.0 14:19 32.87 0.38 565 114 99 0.00 1.2 28 28.0 32.0 14:23 35.92 0.41 564 115 99 0.00 1.3 21 32.0 36.0 14:35 38.475 0.31 559 112 101 0.00 0.98 22 36.0 40.0 14:39 41.67 0.28 556 115 101 0.00 0.89 23 40.0 44.0 14:43 44.30 0.35 559 117 101 0.00 1.1 24 44.0 48.0 14:47 47.72 0.35 558 117 101 0.00 1.1 25 48.0 52.0 14:51 50.93 0.38 559 118 102 0.00 1.2 26 52.0 56.0 14:55 54.20 0.40 562 118 102 0.00 1.25 27 56.0 60.0 14:59 57.49 0.49 562 119 103 0.00 1.55 28 60.0 64.0 15:03 60.70 0.54 561 119 103 0.00 1.7 2

64.0 15:07 64.358

Average: 50.31 0.37 564.6 111.4 99.9 0.00 1.17 2

Leak Check








































































APPENDIX D 

EQUIPMENT 

CALIBRATION 

DOCUMENTS 






















































APPENDIX E 

LABORATORY 

ANALYTICAL REPORTS 
Date Source Method Run Start 

Time

End 

Time

O2 CO2

10/26/10 Curing Oven 316 1 9:01 10:14 18.2 1.1

10/26/10 Cupola 5/29 1 10:10 13:27 19.78 0.96

10/26/10 Cupola OTM27/28 1 10:10 13:29 19.78 0.96

10/26/10 Curing Oven 316 2 11:07 12:17 18.2 0.9

10/26/10 Curing Oven 316 3 13:55 15:07 18.2 1.1

10/26/10 Cupola 5/29 2 14:15 17:36 19.73 0.87

10/26/10 Cupola OTM27/28 2 14:15 17:37 19.73 0.87

10/26/10 Cupola 26A 1 18:01 19:08 19.80 0.90

10/27/10 Cupola 5/29 3 8:37 11:56 19.62 1.01

10/27/10 Cupola OTM27/28 3 8:37 11:52 19.62 1.01

10/27/10 Cupola 0061 1 12:30 15:40 19.84 1.01

10/27/10 Cupola 26A 2 12:30 14:40 19.84 1.01

10/27/10 Cupola 26A 3 14:45 15:48 19.84 1.01

10/28/10 Cupola 0061 2 9:15 12:21 19.76 1.12

10/28/10 Cupola 30B 1 9:15 11:15 19.76 1.12

10/28/10 Cupola 30B 2 11:35 13:35 19.76 1.13

10/28/10 Cupola 0061 3 12:40 15:45 19.76 1.13

10/28/10 Cupola 30B 3 13:50 15:50 19.76 1.13

BTEC Job # 10-3990.14

IIG, Phenix City, Alabama

























Acetone 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

(mg)

Particulate 

Weight on 

Filter 

(mg)

Inorganic 

(mg)

Organic 

(mg)

Filterable 

PM2.5 Catch 

Weight (mg)

Organ

PM2.5 C

Weight 

Run 1 120 15.6 17.8 41 1.7 33.40 1.0 Run 2 120 8.9 15.8 49 3.5 24.70 1.5 Run 3 40 0.9 42.90 51 1.7 43.80 1.0 

Blank: 110.00 ND ND 2.3 ND

RDL: 0.5 0.30 0.50 1.00

OTM 27/28 PM2.5 Lab Results Blank Correction

Industrial Insulation Group, LLC

Phoenix City, AL - Cupola

BTEC job # 10-3990.14

Correc

Sampling Dates: October 26-28, 2010

OTM27 OTM28
Acetone 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

Rinse (mg)

Particulate 

Weight on 

Filter (mg)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

Rinse (mg)

Combined 

Particulate 

Weight (mg)

Blank 210 ND ND

Run 1 120 5.1 34.0 5.1 39.1

Run 2 110 1.7 21.0 1.7 22.7

Run 3 100 1.6 48.1 1.6 49.7

RDL 0.5 0.30

Method 5 PM Lab Results Blank Correction

Corrected

Sampling Dates: October 26-28, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.14

Phoenix City, AL - Cupola

Industrial Insulation Group, LLC
Compound/Fraction

Blank 

Filter 

Result

(μg)

Filter 

RDL 

(μg)

R1 

Result

(μg)

R2 

Result

(μg)

R3 

Result

(μg)

Test Run 

Detection 

Limit (RDL)

(μg)

R1

(μg)

R2 

(μg)

Antimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 0.8 0.8 

Arsenic 0.60 0.40 1.21 1.10 1.39 0.80 0.8 0.8 

Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 0.20 0.20 

Cadmium ND 0.10 1.39 6.01 0.26 0.20 1.39 6.01 

Chromium 1.75 0.30 6.26 5.24 3.47 0.60 4.5 3.5 

Cobalt ND 0.10 2.76 3.61 0.76 0.20 2.76 3.61 

Lead 1.52 0.20 7.98 21.9 3.0 0.40 6.5 20.4 

Manganese 1.02 0.75 4.6 5.9 2.4 1.5 3.6 4.9 

Nickel 0.78 0.50 6.2 8.7 5.6 1.0 5.4 7.9 

Selenium ND 1.0 15.5 15.0 21.9 2.0 15.5 15.0 

Industrial Insulation Group, LLC

Method 29 Lab Results Blank Correction

Corrected

Sampling Dates: October 26-28, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.14

Phoenix City, AL - Cupola
Corrected

Total Volume 

(ml)

Impinger 

KOH (ml)

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg] RDL

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg]

MD

us

Run 1 760 300 2.0 0.4 1.5

Run 2 810 300 0.8 0.4 0.4 <

Run 3 750 300 0.6 0.4 0.4 <

Blank H2O 520 ND 0.30

Blank KOH 440 0.70 0.20

Method 0061 Lab Results Blank Correction

Sampling Dates: October 26-28, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.14

Phoenix City, AL - Cupola

Industrial Insulation Group, LLC
Volume (mL)

Hydrochloric 

Acid (μg)

Hydrofluoric 

Acid (μg)

Hydrochloric 

Acid (μg)

Hyd

Ac

Run 1 340 230 380 230 Run 2 280 ND ND 200 Run 3 410 ND ND 200 

Blank H20 190 ND ND

Blank H2SO4 200 ND ND

RDL 200 200

Corrected

Method 26A Lab Results Blank Correction

Industrial Insulation Group, LLC

Phoenix City, AL - Cupola

BTEC job # 10-3990.14

Sampling Dates: October 26-28, 2010
Volume 

[ml]

Formaldehyde 

[μg]

Methanol 

[μg] RDL

Phenol 

[μg] RDL

Formaldehyde 

[μg]

Metha

[μg

Blank UFDI 160 ND ND ND

Run 1 470 19800 70 238 19800 70 Run 2 490 19000 29 129 19000 29 

Run 3 440 20000 35 136 20000 35 

621 

Forming

Method 316 Lab Results Blank Correction

Correc

October 26, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.14

Phoenix City, AL - Curing Oven

Industrial Insulation Group, LLC
Your Project #: 10-3990.14 

Your C.O.C. #: 0698

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/18

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F8917

Received: 2010/11/05, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 8

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) (1 ) 4 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) (1 ) 4 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) (2 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/12 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) (2 ) 4 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/16 

Weight of DCM Received 4 N/A 2010/11/12 

Weight of Water from Impingers 4 N/A 2010/11/12 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This is a non-accredited test.

(2) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8917 Client Project #: 10-3990.14

Report Date: 2010/11/18

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H T 5 3 4 3 H T 5 3 4 5 H T 5 3 4 6 H T 5 3 4 7

Sampling Date 2010/10/28 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/27

12:25 15:50 19:30 14:30

COC Number 0698 0698 0698 0698

 U n i t s TRAIN R1-OTM28 R2-OTM28 R3-OTM28 RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM28

Weight g 300 370 320 250 0.1 2326676

DCM Weight g 210 240 140 170 0.1 2326673

Inorganic Condensible PM mg 2.3 41 49 51 0.50 2329514

Organic Condensible PM mg ND 1.7 3.5 1.7 1.0 2326671

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H T 5 3 5 0 H T 5 3 5 1 H T 5 3 5 2 H T 5 3 5 3

Sampling Date 2010/10/28 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/27

12:25 15:50 19:30 14:30

COC Number

 U n i t s TRAIN R1-OTM27 R2-OTM27 R3-OTM27 RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 15.6 8.9 0.9 0.5 2327097

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND 17.8 15.8 42.9 0.30 2324109

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 110 120 120 40 1 2327102

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8917 Client Project #: 10-3990.14

Report Date: 2010/11/18

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HT5343 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HT5345 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R1-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HT5346 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R2-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HT5347 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID R3-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HT5350 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324109 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327097 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327102 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Page 3 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8917 Client Project #: 10-3990.14

Report Date: 2010/11/18

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HT5351 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R1-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324109 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327097 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327102 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Maxxam ID HT5352 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R2-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324109 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327097 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327102 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Maxxam ID HT5353 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID R3-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324109 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327097 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327102 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Page 4 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8917 Client Project #: 10-3990.14

Report Date: 2010/11/18

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample HT5343-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HT5345-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HT5346-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HT5347-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish residue found in aluminum dish.

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027): Maxxam # Filter Condition

HT5350-01RNormal

HT5351-01RDE/LFT

HT5352-01RNormal

HT5353-01RLFT

Normal Filters received in normal condition

LFT Loose filter material in the petri dish

DE Edges of the filter are frayed

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.14

P.O. #:

Project name:

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F8917

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2326671 MGE Spiked Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 93 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank DUP Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 90 % 70 - 130

RPD Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 3.4 % 20

Method Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 ND, RDL=1.0 mg

2327097 NUA Method Blank < 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/11/17 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2329514 MGE Method Blank Inorganic Condensible PM 2010/11/15 ND, RDL=0.50 mg

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 6 of 6
Your Project #: 10-3990.14 

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/19

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F8910

Received: 2010/11/05, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) (1 ) 4 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29 

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) (1 ) 4 2010/11/11 2010/11/16 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) (1 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/12 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/15 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8910 Client Project #: 10-3990.14

Report Date: 2010/11/19

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H T 5 3 0 8 H T 5 3 1 0 H T 5 3 1 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/28 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

13:15 15:00 19:00

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN 1-M5/29 RUN 2-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 5.1 1.7 0.5 2327092

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND 34.0 21.0 0.30 2324155

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 210 120 110 1 2327096

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H T 5 3 1 2

Sampling Date 2010/10/27

13:00

 U n i t s RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 1.6 0.5 2327092

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg 48.1 0.30 2324155

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 100 1 2327096

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8910 Client Project #: 10-3990.14

Report Date: 2010/11/19

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H T 5 3 0 8 H T 5 3 1 0 H T 5 3 1 0 H T 5 3 1 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/28 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

13:15 15:00 15:00 19:00

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN 1-M5/29 RUN RUN 2-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 Lab-Dup

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 2332632

Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.60 0.40 1.21 1.22 1.10 0.80 2332632

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 2332632

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug ND 0.10 1.39 1.46 6.01 0.20 2332632

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 1.75 0.30 6.26 6.32 5.24 0.60 2332632

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 2.76 2.81 3.61 0.20 2332632

Total Lead (Pb) ug 1.52 0.20 7.98 8.08 21.9 0.40 2332632

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 1.02 0.75 4.6 4.6 5.9 1.5 2332632

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 0.78 0.50 6.2 6.4 8.7 1.0 2332632

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 15.5 16.2 15.0 2.0 2332632

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H T 5 3 1 2

Sampling Date 2010/10/27

13:00

 U n i t s RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.80 2332632

Total Arsenic (As) ug 1.39 0.80 2332632

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.20 2332632

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 0.26 0.20 2332632

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 3.47 0.60 2332632

Total Cobalt (Co) ug 0.76 0.20 2332632

Total Lead (Pb) ug 3.04 0.40 2332632

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 2.4 1.5 2332632

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 5.6 1.0 2332632

Total Selenium (Se) ug 21.9 2.0 2332632

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8910 Client Project #: 10-3990.14

Report Date: 2010/11/19

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HT5308 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2332632 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327092 2010/11/11 2010/11/16 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2324155 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327096 N/A 2010/11/15 NUA

Maxxam ID HT5310 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2332632 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327092 2010/11/11 2010/11/16 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2324155 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327096 N/A 2010/11/15 NUA

Maxxam ID HT5310 D u p Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2332632 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 N_R

Maxxam ID HT5311 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2332632 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327092 2010/11/11 2010/11/16 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2324155 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327096 N/A 2010/11/15 NUA

Maxxam ID HT5312 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2332632 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327092 2010/11/11 2010/11/16 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2324155 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327096 N/A 2010/11/15 NUA

Page 4 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8910 Client Project #: 10-3990.14

Report Date: 2010/11/19

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Maxxam # Filter Condition

HT5308-01RNormal

HT5310-01RNormal

HT5311-01RNormal

HT5312-01RDE/LFT

Normal Filters received in normal condition

LFT Loose filter material in the petri dish

DE Edges of the filter are frayed

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 2x dilution was required for all samples except HT5308 due to the matrix.

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HT5310.

Trace level As was observed in the Processed Blank.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.14

P.O. #:

Project name:

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F8910

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2327092 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/11/16 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2332632 N_R Matrix Spike

(HT5310) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HT5310) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 99 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HT5310) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 92 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HT5310) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 94 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 2.2 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HT5310) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 90 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HT5310) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 91 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 1.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HT5310) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HT5310) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HT5310) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 97 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HT5310) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 4.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HT5310) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HT5310) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 98 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HT5310) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 97 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HT5310) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 100 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HT5310) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HT5310) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HT5310) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HT5310) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 99 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 3.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HT5310) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 90 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HT5310) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 92 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 2.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 103 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 3.0 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 99 % 85 - 115

Page 6 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.14

P.O. #:

Project name:

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F8910

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2332632 N_R Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 0.6 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 96 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 98 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 1.5 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 99 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 101 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 2.3 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 102 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 102 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 0.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 101 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 101 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 0.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 101 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 104 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 2.8 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 102 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 102 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 0.01 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 102 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 101 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 1.5 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 99 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 99 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 0.1 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 0.48, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 0.50, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Page 7 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.14

P.O. #:

Project name:

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F8910

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2332632 N_R RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/18 5.5 % 20

Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/18 1 % 20

Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/18 1.7 % 20

Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/18 1.2 % 20

Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/18 3.8 % 20

Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/18 4.1 % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 8 of 8
Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other

Client Name BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental112210 Report

Date

Contact Name Phone

Trap I.D. Test Location Date Analyzed Scientist

 Mass ng 

Sect.1

 Mass ng 

Sect.2

Spike 

Level 

Date(s) in 

Stack Comments

80332 Phenix City 11/9/2010 Andrew Mertz 0.63 0.44 10/28/2010 Run 1, Trap A

80282 Phenix City 11/9/2010 Andrew Mertz 20.1 0.37 20 10/28/2010 Run 1, Trap B

80290 Phenix City 11/9/2010 Andrew Mertz 1.47 0.48 10/28/2010 Run 2, Trap A

80308 Phenix City 11/9/2010 Andrew Mertz 21.1 0.53 20 10/28/2010 Run 2, Trap B

80309 Phenix City 11/9/2010 Andrew Mertz 0.58 0.44 10/28/2010 Run 3, Trap A

80289 Phenix City 11/9/2010 Andrew Mertz 19.1 0.28 20 10/28/2010 Run 3, Trap B

Variability +- 10%

Calibration Report Available

Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .031 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less 

than the lowest detection limit.

Plant/Source IIG Cupola 

Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

11/22/2010

(248)-548-8072 

Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew Smith 

msmith@btecinc.com

Your Project #: 10-3990.14 

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/18

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F8885

Received: 2010/11/05, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. (1 ) 5 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A 

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/17 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8885 Client Project #: 10-3990.14

Report Date: 2010/11/18

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H T 5 1 7 1 H T 5 1 7 2 H T 5 1 7 3 H T 5 1 7 3 H T 5 1 7 4

Sampling Date 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

13:35 13:35 19:45 19:45 15:15

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

 U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-.1N RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

H2SO4-M26A 1-H2SO4-M26A 1-H2SO4-M26A 2-H2SO4-M26A

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 190 200 340 280 1 2332604

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND 230 250 ND 200 2333119

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 380 380 ND 200 2333119

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H T 5 1 7 5

Sampling Date 2010/10/26

16:20

COC Number N/A

 U n i t s RUN RDL QC Batch

3-H2SO4-M26A

Volume ml 410 1 2332604

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND 200 2333119

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND 200 2333119

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8885 Client Project #: 10-3990.14

Report Date: 2010/11/18

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HT5171 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2333119 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2332604 N/A 2010/11/17 A_S

Maxxam ID HT5172 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID BLANK-.1N H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2333119 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2332604 N/A 2010/11/17 A_S

Maxxam ID HT5173 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2333119 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2332604 N/A 2010/11/17 A_S

Maxxam ID HT5173 D u p Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2333119 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 A_S

Maxxam ID HT5174 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID RUN 2-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2333119 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2332604 N/A 2010/11/17 A_S

Maxxam ID HT5175 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID RUN 3-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/05

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2333119 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2332604 N/A 2010/11/17 A_S

Page 3 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F8885 Client Project #: 10-3990.14

Report Date: 2010/11/18

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.14

P.O. #:

Project name:

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F8885

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2333119 A_S Matrix Spike

(HT5173) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/17 95 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/17 97 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/17 96 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/17 101 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/17 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/17 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/17 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/17 NC % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 5 of 5
Your Project #: 10-3990.14 

 Site: CUPOLA STACK

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/11

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F7162

Received: 2010/11/03, 12:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 4 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061) 

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 1 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061) 

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/05 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7162 Client Project #: 10-3990.14

Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: CUPOLA STACK

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H S 6 1 8 9 H S 6 1 9 0 H S 6 1 9 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 2010/10/27

13:40 13:40 16:45

 U n i t s R.BLANK-H2O-M0061 RDL R.BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL RUN 1-M0061 RDL QC Batch

Volume ml 520 1 440 1 760 1 2326127

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.3 0.7 0.2 2.0 0.4 2324993

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H S 6 1 9 1 H S 6 1 9 6 H S 6 1 9 7

Sampling Date 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 2010/10/28

16:45 13:30 16:40

 U n i t s RUN 1-M0061 RUN 2-M0061 RUN 3-M0061 RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 810 750 1 2326127

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 2.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 2324993

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7162 Client Project #: 10-3990.14

Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: CUPOLA STACK

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HS6189 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID R.BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2324993 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2326127 N/A 2010/11/05 FMO

Maxxam ID HS6190 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID R.BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2324993 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2326127 N/A 2010/11/05 FMO

Maxxam ID HS6191 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2324993 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2326127 N/A 2010/11/05 FMO

Maxxam ID HS6191 D u p Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2324993 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Maxxam ID HS6196 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2324993 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2326127 N/A 2010/11/05 FMO

Maxxam ID HS6197 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2324993 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2326127 N/A 2010/11/05 FMO

Page 3 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7162 Client Project #: 10-3990.14

Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: CUPOLA STACK

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.14

P.O. #:

Project name: CUPOLA STACK

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F7162

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2324993 LLE Matrix Spike

(HS6191) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 102 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 94 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 ND, RDL=0.2 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 1.9 % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 5 of 5
Your Project #: 10-286-F 

 Site: CURING OVEN

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/15

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F7089

Received: 2010/11/03, 12:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 11

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Formaldehyde (M316) 6 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 BRL SOP-00113 EPA 316 

Final Volume of Impinger 6 N/A 2010/11/10 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) (1 ) 5 N/A 2010/11/08 BRL SOP-00211 NCASI WP99.01mod 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) C

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7089 Client Project #: 10-286-F

Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H S 5 9 1 2 H S 5 9 1 3

Sampling Date 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

13:37 13:35

 U n i t s RB-CURINGOVEN-H2O-M316 RDL BT-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug ND 3.9 ND 7.2 2323959

Volume ml 160 1 290 1 2326326

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H S 5 9 1 4 H S 5 9 1 4 H S 5 9 1 6

Sampling Date 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

10:55 10:55 10:55

 U n i t s R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-M316 R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-M316 RDL R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-M316 RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Formaldehyde ug 18000 18000 440 1800 30 2323959

Volume ml 350 1 120 1 2326326

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H S 5 9 1 7 H S 5 9 1 8

Sampling Date 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

13:00 16:05

 U n i t s R2-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-M316 RDL R3-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 19000 240 20000 220 2323959

Volume ml 490 1 440 1 2326326

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7089 Client Project #: 10-286-F

Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN

MISCELLANEOUS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H S 5 9 0 4 H S 5 9 0 5 H S 5 9 0 5

Sampling Date 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

13:35 10:55 10:55

 U n i t s BT-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-VOA R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-VOA R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-VOA RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Methanol ug ND 46 46 4 2325615

Phenol ug ND 106 113 6 2325615

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H S 5 9 0 6 H S 5 9 0 7 H S 5 9 0 8

Sampling Date 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/26

10:55 13:00 16:05

 U n i t s R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-VOA R2-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-VOA R3-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-VOA RDL QC Batch

Methanol ug 24 29 35 4 2325615

Phenol ug 125 129 136 6 2325615

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7089 Client Project #: 10-286-F

Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HS5904 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID BT-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2325615 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HS5905 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2325615 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HS5905 D u p Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2325615 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HS5906 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2325615 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HS5907 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R2-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2325615 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HS5908 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R3-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2325615 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HS5912 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID RB-CURINGOVEN-H2O-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2323959 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2326326 N/A 2010/11/10

Page 4 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7089 Client Project #: 10-286-F

Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HS5913 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID BT-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2323959 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2326326 N/A 2010/11/10

Maxxam ID HS5914 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2323959 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2326326 N/A 2010/11/10

Maxxam ID HS5914 D u p Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2323959 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 LLE

Maxxam ID HS5916 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2323959 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2326326 N/A 2010/11/10

Maxxam ID HS5917 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R2-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2323959 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2326326 N/A 2010/11/10

Maxxam ID HS5918 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R3-CURINGOVEN-IMP1-3-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/03

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2323959 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2326326 N/A 2010/11/10

Page 5 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F7089 Client Project #: 10-286-F

Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample HS5904-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HS5905-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HS5906-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HS5907-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HS5908-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 6 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-286-F

P.O. #:

Project name: CURING OVEN

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F7089

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2323959 LLE Matrix Spike

(HS5914) Formaldehyde 2010/11/09 100 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Formaldehyde 2010/11/09 100 % 91 - 107

Method Blank Formaldehyde 2010/11/09 ND, RDL=2.5 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Formaldehyde 2010/11/09 0.3 % 20

2325615 SPS Matrix Spike Methanol 2010/11/08 103 % N/A

Phenol 2010/11/08 114 % N/A

Spiked Blank Methanol 2010/11/08 107 % N/A

Phenol 2010/11/08 108 % N/A

Method Blank Methanol 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=50 ug

Phenol 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=6 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Methanol 2010/11/08 0 % N/A

Phenol 2010/11/08 6.4 % 50

N/A = Not Applicable

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 7 of 7
APPENDIX F 

METHOD 318 

ANALYTICAL REPORTS 
Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source ID

Industrial Insulation Group Phoenix City Alabama Curing Oven

Measured Value 

(ppm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(ppmvd at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 318) Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments

Run 1 10/26/2010 9:01 10/26/2010 10:14 88.89 NA wet Method 318 2.12E+00 1.09E+02 4.9 1.1 18.2 1063

Run 2 10/26/2010 11:07 10/26/2010 12:17 85.17 NA wet Method 318 1.99E+00 1.05E+02 5.2 0.9 18.2 1042Run 3 10/26/2010 13:55 10/26/2010 15:07 81.60 NA wet Method 318 1.85E+00 1.00E+02 5.2 18.2 1.1 1026

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/hr)

Flue Gas 

Moisture (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue 

Flow 

(ac

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Process 

Production 

Rate

(tons rock/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Test End Time

Carbon Monoxide Emission Test Results

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date

10-3990.14 - M318 summary.xls CO Emission Data-318 
Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source ID

Industrial Insulation Group Phenix City Alabama Curing Oven

Measured Value 

(ppm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(ppmvd at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 318) Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments

Run 1 10/26/2010 9:01 10/26/2010 10:14 0.10 NA wet Method 318 5.12E-03 2.62E-01 4.9 1.1 18.2 106

Run 2 10/26/2010 11:07 10/26/2010 12:17 0.10 NA wet Method 318 5.00E-03 2.63E-01 5.2 0.9 18.2 104

Run 3 10/26/2010 13:55 10/26/2010 15:07 0.10 NA wet Method 318 4.87E-03 2.63E-01 5.2 18.2 1.1 102

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/hr)

Flue Gas 

Moisture (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flu

Flow 

(a

Process 

Production 

Rate

(tons rock/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Test End Time

Carbonyl Sulfide Emission Test Results

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date

10-3990.14 - M318 summary.xls COS Emission Data-318