alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Search Help More Search Options Printable Version 

## Residential Heating Products Final Rule Analytical Tools The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prepared the analytical spreadsheets listed below for the final rule analyses conducted for the energy conservation standards rulemaking for residential heating products, which includes water heaters, direct heating equipment, and pool heaters. 

### Final Rule Analytical Spreadsheets Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) and Payback Period (PBP) z Gas-fired Storage Water Heater LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Zip 2.2 MB ) z Electric Storage Water Heater LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Zip 1.9 MB ) z Oil-fired Storage Water Heater LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Zip 648 KB ) z Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heater LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Zip 1.4 MB ) z Direct Heating Equipment LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Zip 1.3 MB ) z Pool Heater LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Zip 793 KB ) National Impacts Analysis z Water Heater National Impacts Analysis EERE Information Center Programs and Offices 

### Pa g e 1 of 2 A pp liances and Commercial E q ui p ment Standards: Residential Heatin g Products Final R

...

4/7/2010 htt p ://www2.eere.ener gy . g ov/buildin g s/a pp liance

_ standards/residential/heatin g_p roducts

_ f r ...Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 04/06/2010 Spreadsheet ( Zip 1.6 MB ) z Direct Heating Equipment National Impacts Analysis Spreadsheet ( Excel 545 KB ) z Pool Heater National Impacts Analysis Spreadsheet ( Excel 1.1 MB ) Government Regulatory Impact Model z Water Heater Government Regulatory Impact Model ( Excel 15.4 MB ) z Direct Heating Equipment Government Regulatory Impact Model ( Excel 2.4 MB ) z Pool Heater Government Regulatory Impact Model ( Excel 1.9 MB ) 

### Contact Information Mohammed Khan Project Manager for Heating Products (202) 586-7892
Printable Version 

### Pa g e 2 of 2 A pp liances and Commercial E q ui p ment Standards: Residential Heatin g Products Final R

...

4/7/2010 htt p ://www2.eere.ener gy . g ov/buildin g s/a pp liance

_ standards/residential/heatin g_p roducts

_ f r ...
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsCommentaries     Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians
        
            Commentaries
 Keyword
 Type Select a CategoryTop StoriesMission/TrainingFeaturesSecretary of the AFAF Chief of StaffChief Master Sgt. of the AFCommentariesSequestration NewsSpace/TechnologyHumanitarianAFSO 21Women's History Month 1-15EnvironmentalWarrior CareDiversityDignified TransferSafetyHeritageAir Force FamilyPersonnel MattersCommander's Call TopicsHaiti Earthquake ReliefDon't Ask Don't TellSuicide PreventionWarrior GamesEnergyAircraftEtchbergerSexual AssaultOperation TomodachiOperation Odyssey Dawn2011 Appropriations InformationHurricane Irene9/11AFAWeek in PhotosThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their Words2012 Appropriations InformationAfrican American History MonthAfrican American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29Fiscal Year BudgetAir Force StoriesColorado WildfireChief of Staff ArchiveHurricane IsaacAFA 2012APP RSSAPP Airman VisualsExpeditionary OperationsHurricane SandyTransition GPSAir Force in SpaceSports/RecreationH1N1Women's History Month 16-30Oklahoma Tornado ReliefMemorial DayCOVID-19 CommentariesCOVID-19
 RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 March 27, 2017Let's have a cup of coffee
        Regardless of your profession, many of us have been in positions defining the required leadership and management qualifications as an expectation of our ability to execute our office. But like many things, no two are alike and not one will prevail without the help of another.  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

and

THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

TRADING AGREEMENT AND

ORDER O. 8103

MODIFICATION NO.2

TRADING AGREEMENT AND QRDER MODIFICATION NO.2

In the matter of a Trading Agreement and Order between the Commissioner of Environmental

PrOiection ("Commissioner") and The United Illuminating Company ("OI").

WHEREAS. the Commissioner and UI, having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth

in Trading Agreement and Order No. 8103 issued on February 14, 1996 and Trading Agreement

and Order No. 8103 Modification issued on February 18, 1997, do now, by mutual agreement.

modify paragraphs e. I.. C. I. (d). C.2. and e.S. as follows:

1. Change the second date specified in paragraph C.1. from May I. 1999 to

May 1,2003.

2. Replace paragraph C. I. Cd) as follows: No later than March I, 1999, 2000. 200 I,

2002,2003 and 2004, include with its annual emissions report to the

Commissioner, ERCs used (calculated as described in sections C.I.a. above). by

ozone and non-ozone seasons, for the previous calendar year;

3. Change the date specified in paragraph C.2. from May 1, 1999 to May 1, 2003.

4. Change the first date specified in paragraph C.8. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003.

All other terms and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order No. 8103 and Trading Agreement

and Order No. 8103 Modification issued by the Commissioner acting under Sections 22a-6,

22a~ 171, 22a-174. 22a-176, 22a-l77 and 22a-178 of the Connecticut General Statutes shall remain

in effect.

/lJ1

Initials:

(PriMed on Recycled Piper)

79 Elm Slreel • Hlflford, CT 06106 - 5121

liltp: lid ep.Ulte .Cl.U S

An Equ.al Opporl..nil)' Err:plo)'t.

Date: <1l./11

7 I '
THE UNITED ILLUMrNATING COMPANY 2 TRADING AGREEMENT

A D ORDER 0.8103

MODIFICATION NO.2

./

TIle United Illuminating Company hereby consents to the entry of this modification to the Trading

Agreement and Order without further notice.

The United Illuminating Company

Type Name: Albert N. Henricksen

Type Title: Group Vice President - Support Services

Date: April 30. 1999

Entered as a modification of an Order of the Commissioner of Environmental Protection numbered

8103thiS.x>~ day of ¥ 1999.

CITY OF BRIDGEPORT

LAND RECORDS

ur J. Rocque, Jr.

ommlSSloncr

MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL,

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Certified Document No.
Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
eGames, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (Nos.
333-23709 and  333-26305)  on Form S-3 and in the  registration  statement  (No.
333-42661) on Form S-8 of eGames, Inc. of our report dated July 25, 2000, except
for  notes 8 and 18,  which are as of August  9,  2000 and  September  8,  2000,
respectively,  relating to the  consolidated  balance sheet of eGames,  Inc. and
subsidiary  as of June 30,  2000,  and the related  consolidated  statements  of
operations,  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for the years ended June 30,
2000 and 1999,  which report  appears in the June 30, 2000 Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of eGames, Inc.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 26, 2000
#### In the Matter of Keith Cheatom, Petitioner, v Robert S. Kreindler et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to prohibit the respondents from conducting any further proceedings against the petitioner under Kings County Indictment Number 14149/89.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner’s claim that the principles of double jeopardy bar any further proceedings under this indictment are without merit. The entire jury had not been impanelled and sworn at the time prior trial proceedings were terminated. Therefore, jeopardy did not attach *(see,*CPL 40.30 [1] [b]; *Matter of Brackley v Donnelly,*53 AD2d 849, 850; *People v Jenkins,*135 AD2d 733, 734; *People v Thompson,*79 AD2d 87, 108, n 19).

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged —acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” *(Matter of Holtzman v Goldman,*71 NY2d 564, 569; *accord, Matter of Rush v Mordue,*68 NY2d 348, 353). The petitioner here has failed to demonstrate that the trial court acted in excess of its authorized powers in *704refusing to swear in a twelfth juror or the two alternates at the trial proceedings that were terminated. Thus, he has not shown a clear legal right to the relief he seeks, and his petition must be dismissed. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
#### FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION *v.*JON A. BARAN

*Jon A. Baran,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided April 8, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 17659) is denied.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         Form 10-K for the Year Ending December 31, 1998
</LEGEND>
                  
<CIK>                         0000949091
<NAME>                        Smart Choice Automotive Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
 <CASH>                                         1,268
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  80,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                   12,157
<INVENTORY>                                    20,004
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,688
<PP&E>                                         7,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                 725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,524
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    5,891
<COMMON>                                       66
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,592
<SALES>                                        95,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               95,385
<CGS>                                          57,233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  93,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9,813
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               13,371
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,752
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,299)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,299)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,871)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

10-Q Exhibit 32.1: Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iShares®
Silver Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee T. Kranefuss, Chief Executive Officer of Barclays
Global Investors International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2009  /s/    Lee T. Kranefuss                             
|Lee T. Kranefuss * Chief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer)





|* | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Kranefuss is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04876**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04876\04876_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04876\04876_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04876\04876_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04876\04876_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04876\04876_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04876\04876_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04876\Certification Statement_04876.pdf Plant certification statement x 04876\Plant ID 04876_011911.doc Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey.

04876\Supporting Documentation\04876_Final EPA Copy-Lake Shore-Part A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04876\Supporting Documentation\04876_Final EPA Copy-Lake Shore-Part A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04876\Supporting Documentation\04876_Final EPA Copy-Lake Shore-Part D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04876\04876_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04876\04876_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# L_2007053DE.01003001.xml

| 22.2.2007 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 53/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2007

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 53/30

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2006/118/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 12. Dezember 2006 zum Schutz des Grundwassers vor Verschmutzung und Verschlechterung

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 372 vom 27. Dezember 2006
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 372 vom 27. Dezember 2006

Seite 24, Artikel 7:

anstatt:

„In dem Zeitraum zwischen dem 16. Januar 2013 und dem 22. Dezember 2013 ...“

muss es heißen:

„In dem Zeitraum zwischen dem 16. Januar 2009 und dem 22. Dezember 2013 ...“

Seite 24, Artikel 12, erster Absatz:

anstatt:

„Die Mitgliedstaaten erlassen die Rechts- und Verwaltungsvorschriften, die erforderlich sind, um dieser Richtlinie spätestens ab dem 16. Januar 2013 nachzukommen.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Mitgliedstaaten erlassen die Rechts- und Verwaltungsvorschriften, die erforderlich sind, um dieser Richtlinie spätestens ab dem 16. Januar 2009 nachzukommen.“

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (the Trust) and iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Investing Pool LLC (the Investing Pool) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee T. Kranefuss, Chief Executive Officer of Barclays Global Investors International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust and Manager of the Investing Pool, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust and Investing Pool.



|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007                                                 
|                                                                        
|/s/ LEE T. KRANEFUSS                                                    
|Lee T. Kranefuss * Chief Executive Officer (Principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and the Co-Registrant is a limited liability company and Mr. Kranefuss is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors
International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant and Manager of the Co-Registrant.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

ROBERT LEON MERTENS, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-30182 

D.C. No. 2:03-cr-00073-BLW-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 21, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Robert Leon Mertens appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying 

his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. “[W]e review § 3582(c)(1) sentence 

reduction decisions for abuse of discretion,” United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-30182 

799 (9th Cir. 2021), and we affirm.

Mertens was sentenced in 2004 to 444 months’ imprisonment for 

convictions including distribution of and possession with intent to distribute 

controlled substances, firearm possession, and money laundering. Since that time, 

he has filed two successful motions for a sentence reduction, resulting in a 

sentence of 314 months. In the instant motion, Mertens sought a further reduction, 

citing his ongoing rehabilitative efforts and changing societal attitudes regarding 

marijuana. 

Contrary to Mertens’s contention, the record shows that the court considered 

his arguments and evidence showing that his rehabilitative efforts continued even 

after his two successful sentence reduction motions. The court did not abuse its 

discretion by concluding that those additional efforts, in addition to changing 

societal attitudes about marijuana, did not warrant a third sentence reduction. See 

United States v. Robertson, 895 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 2018) (district court 

abuses its discretion only if its decision is illogical, implausible, or not supported 

by the record).

Mertens’s “Motion for a Notice to the Court and Request for a Hearing” is 

denied.

AFFIRMED.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1845 

To extend the suspension of duty on Avermectin B. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 22, 2009 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Avermectin B. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AVERMECTIN B. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.56 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Avermectin B) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
#### Delmond, Appellee, *v.*The Board Investors Co. et al., Appellees; City of South Euclid, Appellant.

(No. 31096

Decided July 23, 1947.)

*305
      *■Mr. E. A. Plazer,*for appellee Joseph Delmond.

*Mr. Frank T. Gullitan,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Ralph W. Edwards,*for appellees county auditor and county treasurer.

*Mr. Roland A. Baskin,*for appellant.

By the Court.

The judgment of the Court of Appeal^ is affirmed on the. authority of the case of *Bauman*v. *Guckenberger, Aud., ante,*292, this day decided.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.