alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 197 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1860 

To permit each current member of the Board of Directors of the Office 

of Compliance to serve for 3 terms. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 22, 2009 

Mr. LIEBERMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 4, 2009 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To permit each current member of the Board of Directors 

of the Office of Compliance to serve for 3 terms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TERM FOR MEMBERS OF BOARD 

4 OF DIRECTORS OF OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE. 

5 Notwithstanding the second sentence of section 

6 301(e)(1) of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 

7 (2 U.S.C. 1381(e)(1)), any individual serving as a member 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1860 RS

1 of the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance as 

2 of September 30, 2009, may serve for 3 terms. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 197 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1860 

A BILL 

To permit each current member of the Board of Di3 terms. rectors of the Office of Compliance to serve for 

NOVEMBER 4, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12844-12845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5085]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Development and Evaluation of a Clinic-Based 
Screening and Brief Intervention for Changing Behaviors Related to 
Cytomegalovirus Transmission in Pregnant Women, FOA DD12-005, Initial 
Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:


[[Page 12845]]


    Time and Date: 11 a.m.-5 p.m., April 10, 2012 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Development and Evaluation of a Clinic-Based Screening 
and Brief Intervention for Changing Behaviors Related to 
Cytomegalovirus Transmission in Pregnant Women, FOA DD12-005, 
initial review.''
    For Further Information Contact: M. Chris Langub, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop 
F-46, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-3585.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: February 23, 2012.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-5085 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (the Trust) and iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Investing Pool
LLC (the Investing Pool) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee T. Kranefuss, Chief Executive Officer of Barclays
Global Investors International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust and Manager of the Investing Pool, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust and Investing
Pool.



|                              |  | 
|----------------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 11, 2009           
|                             
|/s/ Lee T. Kranefuss         
|Lee T. Kranefuss *           
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and the Co-Registrant is a limited liability company and Mr. Kranefuss is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors
International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant and Manager of the Co-Registrant.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lease Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1.6 
 Renewal Agreement to a Lease Agreement (as amended) (the “Lease”) 
 Date: June 29, 1989 
 Between: 
 Canadian Tomken Inc.
(“Landlord”) 
 and 
 Delphax Technologies Canada Limited (“Tenant”) 
 WHEREAS the Tenant occupies 24,038 square feet of the land and building
owned by the Landlord and designated municipally as 5060 Tomken Road, Mississauga, Ont.; 
 AND WHEREAS the Tenant is the lawful successor to
the original tenant under the Lease; 
 AND WHEREAS the Lease Term expires on August 31, 2005, subject to the Tenants right of renewal;

 AND WHEREAS the Landlord and Tenant have agreed to renew the Lease as follows: 
 Clause I - Term 
 The Term of the Lease is hereby extended to 11:59 P.M. August 31, 2010. 
 Clause II - Basic Annual Rent 
  

	 	1.	The Rental Rate per square foot for the calculation of Basic Annual Rent for the period of September 1, 2005 to August 31, 2010 shall be $5.50; 


 

	 	2.	Basic Annual Rent of ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY-TWO THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED AND NINE DOLLARS ($132,209.00) shall be payable in equal monthly installments on the 1st day of each
month commencing September 1, 2005 in the amount of ELEVEN THOUSAND AND SEVENTEEN DOLLARS AND 41 CENTS ($11,017.41), together with all other sums properly payable under the Lease. 

 Clause III - Renewal 
  

	 	1.	When not in default, the Tenant shall have 1 right of renewal for a further period of THREE (3) YEARS from the expiration of the term, herein, such right to be exercised
in writing at least SIX (6) MONTHS prior to the expiration of the term herein; 









	 	2.	The basic Annual Rental Rate shall be market rent but shall not be less than SIX DOLLARS ($6.00) per square foot or more than SIX DOLLARS, SEVENTY-FIVE CENTS
($6.75) per square foot. 

 Clause IV - Restoration Conditions 
  

	 	1.	The Tenant will leave all “roof top” HVAC equipment in place of roof, and will not be required to remove same on lease termination. All such HVAC equipment to be in good
working condition, on expiry of lease extension or on expiry of any further extension(s) to the lease. Such equipment will become the property of the building owner. All other roof venting and other equipment, that is mounted on and/or vented
through the roof to be removed and roof restored, at the Tenant's expense, and in accordance with the terms of the lease; 

  

	 	2.	All other terms and conditions with regard to restoration, under the Lease, shall remain the same. 

 Clause IV - General 
  

	 	1.	The Tenant accepts building in “as is” condition; 

  

	 	2.	Except as amended herein, all other terms of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect. 

 Dated as of July 15, 2005 
  

			
	Canadian Tomken Inc.
		
	Per:	 	/s/ Philip
Brent                                        
c/s
		 	Philip Brent - President
	
	Delphax Technologies Canada Limited
		
	Per:	 	 /s/ Dieter P. Schilling

	Name:	 	Dieter P. Schilling
	Title:	 	Corp. V.P. Eng. & Mfg.
		
	Per:	 	 /s/ R Vella

	Name:	 	Ray Vella
	Title:	 	Controller
	
	We have authority to bind our respective parties.
	
	/s/ Witness: Joanne Gilroy.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1860 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1860

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To permit each current member of the Board of Directors of the Office 
                  of Compliance to serve for 3 terms.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TERM FOR MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OFFICE 
              OF COMPLIANCE.

    Notwithstanding the second sentence of section 301(e)(1) of the 
Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1381(e)(1)), any 
individual serving as a member of the Board of Directors of the Office 
of Compliance as of September 30, 2009, may serve for 3 terms.

            Passed the Senate November 5, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1860

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To permit each current member of the Board of Directors of the Office 
                  of Compliance to serve for 3 terms.
```
THE UNITED BUILDING

77 WEST WACKER DRIVE

CHICAGO, IL60601

DAN WEISS

MANAGING DIRECTOR, INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS & REGULATORY 

PHONE/FAX: (312) 997-7573

DAN.WEISS@COAIR.COM

July 13, 2012

Mr. Paul L. Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of United and SkyWest for Exemptions and Designations

Docket DOT-OST-2012-0113 (Chicago, Illinois-Monterrey, Mexico)

Dear Mr. Gretch:

United has completed its poll of carrier representatives in the attached service list. No carrier

objects to the grant of United and SkyWest’s application for exemptions and designations to 

serve the Chicago, Illinois-Monterrey, Mexico route. United asks that the requested authorities

be awarded promptly so that the carriers can secure foreign authority, make final operating plans 

and begin marketing their services in this route.

Respectfully submitted,

Dan Weiss

Managing Director, International Affairs & Regulatory 

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. 

cc: Esta Rosenberg

Brian Hedberg

Todd Emerson
 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all 

persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email.

mssinick@ssd.com

carl.nelson@aa.com

francis.heil@aa.com

james.kaleigh@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com

bob.kneisley@wnco.com

leslie.abbott@wnco.com

dkirstein@yklaw.com

jyoung@yklaw.com

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

jegillick@zsrlaw.com

john.varley@virginamerica.com

william.stallings@usdoj.gov

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

john.allen@faa.gov

Annalei Avanceña 

International Regulatory Advisor

July 13, 2012
Aircraft Maintenance Logbook Owner/Operator:Southern Business Services 

LLC. 

Manufacturer: DJI Model: S1000+ Date Put into Service:__06/23/2015________________ 

Date Tech. Remarks Serial Number Firmware

 BK Airframe: 03P0010667 

 Landing Gear: 03Q0010436 

 Gimbal: 00A0013080/0180377394 

 Gimbal Control Unit (GCU): 0070131110 

 A2 Main Controller (MC): 01R0045768 

 A2 IMU: 0210072702 

 A2 GPS: 01T0066367 

 A2 LED: 01J0094232 

 A2 PMU: 01S0042052 

 iOSD: 0190542736 

 Arm Red CW : 03R0014502 

 Arm Red CCW: 03R0014511 

 Arm Green CW: 03R0014737 

 Arm Green CCW: 03R0014308 

 Arm Green CW: 03R0014762 

 Arm Green CCW: 03R0014318 

 Arm Green CW: 03R0014751 

 Arm Green CCW: 03R0014305 

 
Date Tech Remarks Serial Number Firmware

 Datalink Air Unit: 

 Ground Unit: 

01Y0064786 

01X0064786 

 Video Transmitter: 00C0214294 

 Video Receiver: N/A 

 Lightbridge Air Unit: 

 Main Controller: 

 Decoder: 

 Transmitter: 

Air Unit Serial #2: 

N/A 

 Lightbridge Ground Unit: 

 Main Controller: 

 Encoder: 

 Transmitter: 

N/A
MEMORANDUM

Date: August 12, 2015 

Subject: Summary of discussion from the July 15, 2015, meeting between API

representatives and the Environmental Protection Agency on oil and gas 

rules, including source determination 

From: Cheryl Vetter, EPA/OAQPS/AQPD/NSRG

 

To: EPA Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0685 

I. PURPOSE

This memorandum summarizes the July 15, 2015 meeting between the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) and representatives of the American Petroleum Institute (API). The 

purpose of the meeting was to listen to API’s input on oil and gas rules in development. 

II. DATE

The meeting occurred from 9:00 am to 12:00 pm EDT July 15, 2015, at EPA 

Headquarters offices in Research Triangle Park, NC. 

III. ATTENDEES

The following individuals participated in the meeting:

API members/representatives

Greg Johnston, Chesapeake Energy 

Jeff Adams (BP)

Shankar Anarthakrishna, Chevron 

Rober Ferry, TGB Partnership

Grover Campbell, Devon Energy 

Tom Monahan, XTO 

Mark Barera, Williams

Matt Todd, API 

Jim Cooper, Chesapeake 

Kimberly Coy, Shell 

John Wagner, API

Jenny Yang, Conoco Phillips 

Jason Zapalac, Anadarko
2 

Adam Berig, Encana

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Bruce Moore. OAQPS 

Cheryl Vetter, OAQPS

David Cozzie, OAQPS

Lisa Thompson, OAQPS

Denise Grubert, ERM

Matthew Witosky, EPA

Amy Hambrick, EPA 

Jodi Howard, EPA 

IV. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION

The meeting was primarily for API to provide their recommendations on the revisions to the 

NSPS. Representatives of API and its member companies did ask questions about the timing of 

the source determination rule. Ms. Vetter responded that the source determination rule would be 

released in conjunction with the other oil and gas rules. Representatives of API and its member 

companies also asked specific questions about the content of the rule. Ms. Vetter assured them 

that they would have the opportunity to raise these issues during the public comment period.
March 29, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

AMERICAN DISCOVERY ENERGY, INC., Appellant

NO. 14-11-00158-CV V.

APACHE CORPORATION, Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, APACHE 

CORPORATION, signed September 1, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. 

We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment 

of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, AMERICAN DISCOVERY ENERGY, INC., to pay all costs 

incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





|In connection with the quarterly report of Execute Sports, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|Dated:  October 8, 2008                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





36



|
|
#### Laura ROMSTROM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert J. AMTER and Joseph A. Amter or his estate, d/b/a Equity Mortgage Investors, a Partnership, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 83CA1264.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

March 14, 1985.

Rehearing Denied May 2, 1985.

Certiorari Denied Nov. 4, 1985.

Dominick, Coveil & Stern, P.C., Donald W. Alperstein, Law Offices of Arnold Al-perstein, P.C., Arnold Alperstein, Denver, for plaintiff-appellant.

Arnold *&*Porter, Harris D. Sherman, Andre M. Reiman, Laurie J. Bennett, Denver, for defendants-appellees.

PIERCE, Judge.

Plaintiff, Laura Romstrom, was the owner of four parcels of land encumbered by deeds of trust in favor of defendants, Robert J. Amter and the estate of Joseph A. Amter d/b/a Equity Mortgage Investors. Following plaintiff’s default on the obli*4gations secured by the deeds of trust, defendants acquired the property through foreclosure, and resold it at a considerable profit. Plaintiff brought suit for the proceeds of the resale. The trial court dismissed the complaint, and we affirm.

Defendants’ bid at the June 1, 1977, foreclosure sale was approximately equal to the amount of outstanding indebtedness owed by plaintiff. They were issued public trustee’s deeds on August 17, 1977, following the expiration of plaintiff’s period for redemption.

Plaintiff’s complaint did not contest the validity of the foreclosure sale, but alleged that the sum obtained by defendants’ resale of the property was “grossly in excess [of] the amount owed by plaintiff to defendants,” and that “[t]he profits realized by defendants were unconscionably high and amounted to unlawful profits by defendants.”

On appeal, plaintiff’s principal contention is that the complaint, taken together with the allegations in plaintiff’s brief in opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment and its accompanying affidavit, is sufficient to state a claim for fraud or for equitable relief. We disagree.

If, following foreclosure, the owner fails to exercise her right of redemption during the statutory period, all right, title, and interest in and to the property is ordinarily lost. *See Baber v. Baber,*28 Colo.App. 530, 474 P.2d 630 (1970).

Here, plaintiff does not contest the validity of the foreclosure sale or of the public trustee’s deeds subsequently issued to defendants. Hence, it follows that plaintiff was without any interest in the property or in the proceeds of the sale of the property. Any allegations of impropriety in the bids for the property are relevant only to the validity of the foreclosure sale itself, not to the right to the proceeds of the subsequent sale of the property. Accordingly, the complaint was properly dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. *See Fort Collins*—Loveland *Water District v. City of Fort Collins,*174 Colo. 79, 482 P.2d 986 (1971); *Nelson v. Nelson,*31 Colo.App. 63, 497 P.2d 1284 (1972).

In view of our disposition of this issue, we do not reach plaintiff’s remaining contention.

Defendants’ request for attorney fees is denied.

Judgment affirmed.

SMITH and BABCOCK, JJ., concur.
#### Leslie Downe, Respondent, v Marie Treadwell, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In an action, *inter alia,*for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant Marie Treadwell appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered January 3, 1990, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and awarded specific performance.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On July 19, 1986, the plaintiff, as buyer, and the defendant Marie Treadwell, as seller, entered into a contract for the purchase of real property. The contract contained a provision that in the event that the seller was unable to convey good title, the seller was entitled to a reasonable adjournment to remove such objections, but would not be compelled to bring any action or proceeding or incur any expense in order to render title marketable. In the event objections could not be removed, the buyer’s remedies were limited to rescission of the contract and return of his down payment, or acceptance of such title as the seller could convey without abatement of the purchase price. At the closing, the parties discovered that a lis pendens had been filed against the property, and the plaintiff refused to close.

After negotiations with the third party who had filed the lis pendens failed, the plaintiff commenced the instant action. After initiation of the action, the plaintiff purchased from the third party the right to remove the lis pendens from the property. The plaintiff then moved for summary judgment, seeking specific performance of the contract of sale. The Supreme Court awarded the plaintiff buyer specific performance, and directed the appellant to deliver title to him.

We find that under the circumstances, and in view of the fact that all title objections have been removed, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment for specific performance of the contract was properly granted *(see, S.E.S. Importers v Pappalardo,*53 NY2d 455; *Cohn v Mezzacappa Bros.,*155 AD2d 506; *Laws v Henrock Realty Corp.,*82 AD2d 797).

*674We have reviewed the appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review, or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.