13974 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 46 / Thursday, March 8, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

categorical exclusion determination as 

appropriate. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR Part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 

1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 

107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T01–0048 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T01–0048 Regulated Navigation 

Area; MBTA Saugus River Railroad 

Drawbridge rehabilitation project, Saugus 

River, MA. 

(a) Location. The following area is a 

Regulated 

Navigation Area (RNA): All navigable 

waters, surface to bottom, on the Saugus 

River, within a 300 yard radius of 

position 42°26′50′′ N, 70°58′19′′ W in the 

vicinity of the MBTA Saugus River 

Railroad Drawbridge between Saugus 

and Lynn, MA. 

(b) Regulations. (1) The general 

regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.10, 

165.11, and 165.13 apply in addition to 

those provisions outlined below. 

(2) In accordance with the general 

regulations, entry into or movement 

within this zone during periods of 

enforcement is prohibited unless 

authorized by Captain of the Port Sector 

Boston (COTP). 

(3) All persons and vessels must 

comply with all directions given to 

them by the COTP or the on-scene 

representative. The ‘‘on-scene 

representative’’ of the COTP is any 

Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or 

petty officer who has been designated 

by the COTP to act on the COTP’s 

behalf. The on-scene representative may 

be on a Coast Guard vessel or other 

designated craft, or may be on shore and 

will communicate with vessels via 

VHF–FM radio or loudhailer. Members 

of the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be 

present to inform vessel operators of 

this regulation. 

(4) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast 

Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing 

light or other means, the operator of the 

vessel must proceed as directed. 

(5) Notwithstanding any other 

provisions in this regulation, the 

movement of official, emergency vessels 

within the regulated area will be 

permitted provided that the contractor 

is notified in order to remove potential 

hazards or obstructions. 

(6) All other relevant regulations, 

including but not limited to the Rules of 

the Road (33 CFR Subchapter E, Inland 

Navigational Rules), remain in effect 

within the regulated area and must be 

strictly followed at all times. 

(c) Enforcement period. (1) This 

regulation is enforceable each week 

from Friday at 11 p.m. until Monday at 

4 a.m., from February 24, 2012, through 

November 30, 2012. 

(2) The COTP Sector Boston will 

cause notice of enforcement to be made 

by all appropriate means to achieve the 

widest distribution among the affected 

segments of the public. Such means of 

notification may include but are not 

limited to Broadcast Notice to Mariners, 

Local Notice to Mariners, and Marine 

Safety Information Bulletins. Such 

notification will include the dates and 

times that enforcement will begin and 

end. 

(d) Penalties. Failure to comply with 

this section may result in civil or 

criminal penalties pursuant to the Ports 

and Waterways Safety Act, 33 U.S.C. 

1221 et seq. Report violations of this 

regulated navigation area to the COTP 

Sector Boston, at 617–223–5757 or on 

VHF–Channel 16. 

Dated: February 17, 2012. 

D.A. Neptun, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 

First Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2012–5329 Filed 3–7–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R02–OAR–2011–0796, FRL–9645–4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; New York State 

Ozone Implementation Plan Revision 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving a proposed 

revision to the New York State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone 

concerning the control of volatile 

organic compounds. The proposed SIP 

revision consists of amendments to Title 

6 of the New York Codes, Rules and 

Regulations Part 228, ‘‘Surface Coating 

Processes, Commercial and Industrial 

Adhesives, Sealants and Primers,’’ Part 

234, ‘‘Graphic Arts,’’ and Part 241, 

‘‘Asphalt Pavement and Asphalt Based 

Surface Coating.’’ The intended effect of 

this action is to approve control 

strategies, required by the Clean Air Act, 

which will result in emission reductions 

that will help attain and maintain the 

national ambient air quality standards 

for ozone. 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule will be 

effective April 9, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under the Federal 

Docket Management System (FDMS) 

which replaces the Regional Materials 

in EDOCKET (RME) docket system. The 

new FDMS is located at 

www.regulations.gov and the docket ID 

for this action is EPA–R02–OAR–2011– 

0796. All documents in the docket are 

listed in the FDMS index. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in FDMS or in hard 

copy at the Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 2 Office, Air Programs 

Branch, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New 

York, New York 10007–1866. Copies of 

the documents relevant to this action 

are also available for public inspection 

during normal business hours, by 

appointment at the Air and Radiation 

Docket and Information Center, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue 

NW., Washington, DC; and the New 

York State Department of 

Environmental Conservation, Division 

of Air Resources, 625 Broadway, 

Albany, New York 12233. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk 

J. Wieber, Air Programs Branch, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 290 

Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New 

York 10007–1866, (212) 637–3381. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. What was included in New York’s 

submittals? 

II. What is EPA’s evaluation of part 228, 

‘‘Surface Coating Processes, Commercial 

and Industrial Adhesives, Sealants and 

Primers?’’ 

III. What is EPA’s evaluation of part 234, 

‘‘Graphic Arts?’’ 

IV. What is EPA’s evaluation of part 241, 

‘‘Asphalt Pavement and Asphalt Based 

Surface Coating?’’ 

V. What comments did EPA receive in 

response to its proposal? 

VI. What is EPA’s conclusion? 

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What was included in New York’s 

submittals? 

On August 19, 2010 and December 15, 

2010, the New York State Department of 

Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 46 / Thursday, March 8, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 13975 

submitted to EPA proposed revisions to 

the SIP, which included state adopted 

revisions to three regulations contained 

in Title 6 of the New York Code of Rules 

and Regulations (6 NYCRR) Part 228, 

‘‘Surface Coating Processes, Commercial 

and Industrial Adhesives, Sealants and 

Primers,’’ Part 234, ‘‘Graphic Arts,’’ and 

Part 241, ‘‘Asphalt Pavement and 

Asphalt Based Surface Coating’’ with 

effective dates of September 30, 2010, 

July 8, 2010 and January 1, 2011, 

respectively. These revisions are 

applicable statewide and will therefore 

provide volatile organic compound 

(VOC) emission reductions statewide 

and will address, in part, attainment of 

the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient 

air quality standards (NAAQS or 

standard) in the Poughkeepsie, Jefferson 

County and the New York portion of the 

New York-Northern New Jersey-Long 

Island, NY-NJ-CT (NYMA) moderate 

nonattainment areas. 

II. What is EPA’s evaluation of part 

228, ‘‘Surface Coating Processes, 

Commercial and Industrial Adhesives, 

Sealants and Primers?’’ 

Part 228 contains the required 

elements for a federally enforceable 

rule: emission limitations, compliance 

procedures and test methods, 

compliance dates and record keeping 

provisions. In contrast to the Control 

Techniques Guideline (CTG) document 

for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives 

dated September 2008, Part 228 is 

applicable to all stationary sources 

including those applications that occur 

outside of the factory setting, such as 

applied in the field. In addition, it 

includes provisions that apply to the 

selling, supplying, offering for sale or 

manufacture for sale in New York of 

adhesives, sealants, adhesive primers 

and sealant primers, along with 

container labeling requirements and 

product registrations. The VOC content 

restrictions for these products apply to 

both their manufacture and application. 

Stationary sources also have the option 

of using add-on control equipment 

provided it achieves 85 percent control. 

Part 228 also regulates the VOC content/ 

vapor pressure of surface-preparation 

and clean-up solvents for which the 

CTG did not make recommendations 

other than including work practices. 

EPA recommends that when states 

evaluate reasonably available control 

technology (RACT), as required by 

section 182(b), when implementing a 

revised 8-hour ozone standard, that they 

review the VOC content limits for wood 

adhesives. This category of adhesives is 

included in the CTG recommended VOC 

emission limits. Overall, Part 228: (1) 

Regulates the same adhesives and 

adhesive primers as the CTG with the 

addition of regulating sealants and 

sealant primers, (2) applies to additional 

stationary sources, and (3) provides for 

similar exemptions as the CTG 

recommends. 

EPA has evaluated New York’s 

submittal for consistency with the Clean 

Air Act, EPA regulations, and EPA 

policy. EPA has determined that Part 

228 is as effective in regulating this 

source category as the CTG and is 

approving it as part of the SIP and as 

meeting the requirement to adopt a 

RACT rule for the Miscellaneous 

Industrial Adhesives CTG category. 

III. What is EPA’s evaluation of part 

234, ‘‘Graphic Arts?’’ 

Part 234 contains the required 

elements for a federally enforceable 

rule: Emission limitations, compliance 

procedures and test methods, 

compliance dates and record keeping 

provisions. 

In contrast to the two CTG 

documents, one for Offset Lithographic 

Printing and Letterpress Printing and a 

second for Flexible Package Printing, 

issued by EPA in September 2006, Part 

234 is generally applicable to all graphic 

arts facilities located in a severe ozone 

nonattainment area, which includes the 

NYMA, or to facilities that emit total 

actual annual VOC graphic arts 

emissions of three tons or more on a 12- 

month rolling basis, which is consistent 

with or more stringent than the CTG’s. 

Offset Lithographic Printing and 

Letterpress Printing 

In addition to the general revisions to 

Part 234, the revised section 234.3 

addresses the CTG for Offset 

Lithographic Printing and Letterpress 

Printing. Subsections (b), (c) and (d) 

were added and require more stringent 

emission controls. Subsection 234.3(b) 

requires control equipment achieve 

overall removal efficiencies, i.e., 90 

percent if installed prior to July 8, 2010 

and 95 percent if installed on or after 

July 8, 2010. Subsection 234.3(d) 

includes the VOC limits for heatset web, 

sheet-fed and cold-set offset 

lithographic printing processes. 

Subsection 234.3(c) limits provisions for 

cleaning materials to a composite vapor 

pressure less than 10 mm Hg 

(millimeters mercury) or VOC content of 

less than 70 percent by weight, with 

some exceptions. In addition, section 

234.6 requires best management 

practices for handling, storage and 

disposal of VOCs, such as keeping VOC 

and VOC containing materials in closed 

containers, keeping VOC containing 

shop towels in closed containers, and 

recordkeeping requirements. These 

revisions are consistent with the CTG 

recommendations issued on October 5, 

2006. 

EPA evaluated these provisions for 

consistency with the Clean Air Act, EPA 

regulations, and EPA policy and is 

approving them. 

Flexible Package Printing 

In addition to the general provisions 

of Part 234, the revised subsection 

234.3(a) addresses the CTG for Flexible 

Package Printing. Subsection 

234.3(a)(1)(ii) was added and requires 

more stringent emission controls for 

publication rotogravure and other 

printing processes. Subsection 

234.3(a)(1)(i) contains new maximum 

allowable VOC content limits for inks, 

coatings and adhesives (minus water). 

Section 234.6 requires best management 

practices (see above description). These 

revisions are consistent with the CTG 

recommendations issued on October 5, 

2006. 

EPA evaluated these provisions for 

consistency with the Clean Air Act, EPA 

regulations, and EPA policy and is 

approving them. 

IV. What is EPA’s evaluation of part 

241, ‘‘Asphalt Pavement and Asphalt 

Based Surface Coating?’’ 

Part 241 contains the regulatory 

provisions applicable to asphalt 

pavements and asphalt based surface 

coatings. These provisions were 

previously regulated under 6 NYCRR 

Part 205, ‘‘Architectural and Industrial 

Maintenance (AIM) Coatings’’ and Part 

211, ‘‘General Prohibitions.’’ New York 

revised these two rules by removing the 

asphalt provisions and moving them 

into new rule Part 241. 

New York removed the seasonal limit 

that allowed the use of cutback asphalt 

from October 16th to May 1st. Part 241 

only allows the use of cutback asphalt 

in two circumstances: When the asphalt 

is used in the production of long-life 

stockpile material for pavement 

patching and repair and when the 

asphalt is used as a penetrating prime 

coat for the purpose of preparing a 

surface to receive asphalt pavement. 

New York included a VOC content 

limit in Part 241 for asphalt surface 

coatings. No asphalt based surface 

coating may be applied, sold, offered for 

sale, or manufactured if it contains more 

than 100 grams of VOC per liter. This 

is consistent with the limit that was 

previously included in Part 205. 

Part 241 also includes limits for 

emulsified asphalt. No emulsified 

asphalt, as classified under ASTM 

International standard specifications 

D 977 or D 2397 may be applied, sold, 

offered for sale, or manufactured that 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
13976 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 46 / Thursday, March 8, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

contains oil distillate, as determined by 

ASTM International standard test 

method D 6997, in amounts that exceed 

the following limits (milliliters of oil 

distillate per 200 gram sample): 

(a) Three milliliters for ASTM grades 

RS–1, SS–1, SS–1h, CRS–1, CSS–1, and 

CSS–1h; 

(b) Five milliliters for ASTM grades 

RS–2, CRS–2, and HFRS–2; 

(c) Sixteen milliliters for ASTM 

grades MS–2, HFMS–2 and HFMS–2h; 

and 

(d) Twenty milliliters for ASTM 

grades CMS–2 and CMS–2h. 

Similar limits were previously 

included in Part 211 but they were 

expressed as VOC content limits in 

percent by weight. The revised limits 

included in Part 241 are approximately 

17–25 percent more stringent than what 

was previously included in Part 211. 

EPA notes that while the revised 

limits in Part 241 are more stringent 

than the previous limits included in 

Part 211, the States of New Jersey, 

Delaware and Connecticut have adopted 

emission limits more stringent than Part 

241, specifically during the ozone 

season months. EPA recommends that 

when New York evaluates RACT, as is 

required by section 182(b) when 

implementing a revised 8-hour ozone 

standard, that New York consider more 

stringent asphalt paving limits in line 

with those adopted by the neighboring 

states. 

EPA evaluated the provisions of Part 

241 for consistency with the Clean Air 

Act, EPA regulations, and EPA policy 

and is approving them. 

V. What comments did EPA receive in 

response to its proposal? 

On December 12, 2011 (76 FR 77178), 

EPA proposed to approve New York’s 

revised Parts 228, 234 and 241. For a 

detailed discussion on the content and 

requirements of the revisions to New 

York’s regulations, the reader is referred 

to EPA’s proposed rulemaking action. 

In response to EPA’s December 12, 

2011 proposed rulemaking action, EPA 

received no comments. 

VI. What is EPA’s conclusion? 

EPA has evaluated New York’s 

submittal for consistency with the Clean 

Air Act, EPA regulations, and EPA 

policy. EPA is approving the revisions 

made to Title 6 of the New York Code 

of Rules and Regulations (6 NYCRR) 

Part 228, ‘‘Surface Coating Processes, 

Commercial and Industrial Adhesives, 

Sealants and Primers,’’ Part 234, 

‘‘Graphic Arts,’’ and new Part 241, 

‘‘Asphalt Pavement and Asphalt Based 

Surface Coating,’’ with effective dates of 

September 30, 2010, July 8, 2010 and 

January 1, 2011, respectively. EPA has 

determined that the revisions meet the 

SIP requirements of the Clean Air Act 

and fulfill the recommended controls 

identified in the applicable CTGs. EPA 

is approving these revisions and is also 

approving the revisions made to 6 

NYCRR Part 205, ‘‘Architectural and 

Industrial Maintenance (AIM) Coatings’’ 

and Part 211, ‘‘General Prohibitions,’’ 

both effective January 1, 2011, to avoid 

redundancy and conflict of the asphalt 

paving and coating provisions included 

in new Part 241. 

VII. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Clean Air Act and 

applicable Federal regulations. 42 

U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, 

in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s 

role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this 

action merely approves state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by May 7, 2012. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Oxides of 

Nitrogen, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: February 27, 2012. 

Judith A. Enck, 

Regional Administrator, Region 2. 

Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 46 / Thursday, March 8, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 13977 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart HH—New York 

■ 2. In § 52.1670, the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by revising the entries 

for Title 6, Parts 205, 211, 228 and 234 

and adding new entry Part 241 in 

numerical order to read as follows: 

§ 52.1670 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED NEW YORK STATE REGULATIONS

New York State regulation State effective 

date Latest EPA approval date Comments 

Title 6 

* * * * * * * 

Part 205, Architectural and Industrial 

Maintenance (AIM) Coatings.

1/1/11 3/8/12 [Insert page number where the 

document begins].

* * * * * * * 

Part 211, General Prohibitions ................. 1/1/11 3/8/12 [Insert page number where the 

document begins].

Section 211.1 (previously numbered 

211.2) is not part of the approved 

plan. (see 11/27/98, 63 FR 65559) 

* * * * * * * 

Part 228, Surface Coating Processes, 

Commercial and Industrial Adhesives, 

Sealants and Primers.

9/30/10 3/8/12 [Insert page number where the 

document begins].

* * * * * * * 

Part 234, Graphic Arts .............................. 7/8/10 3/8/12 [Insert page number where the 

document begins].

SIP revisions submitted in accordance 

with § 234.3(f) are effective only if approved by EPA. 

* * * * * * * 

Part 241, Asphalt Pavement and Asphalt 

Based Surface Coating.

1/1/11 3/8/12 [Insert page number where the 

document begins].

* * * * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2012–5646 Filed 3–7–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 60 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0873; FRL–9643–9] 

RIN 2060–AH23 

Quality Assurance Requirements for 

Continuous Opacity Monitoring 

Systems at Stationary Sources 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule; announcement 

of extension of comment period. 

SUMMARY: The EPA is extending the 

comment period for the direct final rule 

titled, ‘‘Quality Assurance Requirements 

for Continuous Opacity Monitoring 

Systems at Stationary Sources,’’ that 

were published in the Federal Register 

on February 14, 2012. The 30-day 

comment period is scheduled to end on 

March 15, 2012. The extended comment 

period will close on April 30, 2012. The 

EPA is extending the comment period 

because of a request we received in a 

timely manner. 

DATES: The comment period for the 

direct final February 14, 2012 (77 FR 

8160), is extended. Comments must be 

received on or before April 30, 2012. 

The effective date for the rule remains 

April 16, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2010–0873 by one of the following 

methods: 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (202) 566–9744. 

• Mail: Attention Docket ID No. EPA– 

HQ–OAR–2010–0873, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. 

• Hand Delivery: The EPA Docket 

Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Docket’s normal 

hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2010– 

0873. The EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means the EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to the EPA without 

going through www.regulations.gov, 

your email address will be 

automatically captured and included as 

part of the comment that is placed in the 

public docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, the EPA recommends that 

you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES