alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0047

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TAMARA L CHAMBERLAIN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 30, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 22 2023

09/22/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0047
Exhibit 12.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Harvey Keats, President and Director certify that:
 
 1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Donner Minerals Ltd.;
 
 2.   Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;
 
 4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 
 a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
 
 c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.   The company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:  August 31, 2004
 
 Harvey Keats
 By:      President
 /s/Harvey Keats/s/
Hello all,

0MB has determined that the final rule: Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule Step 3 and

GHG Plantwide Applicability Limits is not significant under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. Please let me know if you have anyfurther questions, and if we don’t talk have a great weekend.

Take care,

Dom

1
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00149-CR

JAMES CALVIN MASSEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 371st District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1632168D)

March 3, 2022

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(p)

JUDGMENT ON REHEARING

After reviewing the State’s motion for rehearing, we grant the motion. We 

withdraw our December 9, 2021 opinion and judgment and substitute the following.

This court has again considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the 

trial court is reversed, and this case is remanded to the trial court for further 

proceedings consistent with this opinion.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the Act) and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), each of the undersigned, Randall D. Stilley, President and Chief Executive Officer of Hercules Offshore, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), and Lisa W. Rodriguez,
who is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that, to his and her knowledge:

(1) the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: April 30, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    Randall D. Stilley                               
|                      |  |  |  | Randall D. Stilley President and Chief Executive Officer

| |  |  |  |                                                  
| |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
| |  | 
| |  |  |  | /s/    Lisa W. Rodriguez                         
| |  |  |  | Lisa W. Rodriguez                                
| |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and Rule 13a-14(b)
promulgated under the Exchange Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
10-Q Exhibit 32.1: Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the iShares® GSCI® Commodity-Indexed Trust (the Trust) and iShares® GSCI® Commodity-Indexed Investing Pool LLC (the Investing Pool) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee T. Kranefuss, Chief Executive Officer of Barclays Global Investors International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust and
Manager of the Investing Pool, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust and Investing Pool.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006      
|                             
|/s/ Lee T. Kranefuss         
|Lee T. Kranefuss *           
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal executive officer)

---

|* | The Registrant is a trust and the Co-Registrant is a limited liability company and Mr. Kranefuss is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors
International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant and Manager of the Co-Registrant.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Barco Auto Leasing Corp., Appellant, v David Harmon, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for breach of *668an automobile lease, the plaintiff appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), dated June 14, 1989, which, upon granting that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment, awarded it judgment in the principal sum of only $250, and denied that branch of its motion which was for a hearing to determine reasonable attorneys’ fees, and (2) as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated January 29, 1990, as, upon renewal and upon vacating the prior order, declined to award it summary judgment in the principal sum of $6,263.67.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 14, 1989, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated January 29, 1990, made upon renewal; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated January 29, 1990, is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for summary judgment in the principal sum of $6,263.37 is granted, and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

Paragraph 10 of the lease agreement is a valid liquidated damages clause. The sums due and owing under this clause are proportionate to the injury sustained by the plaintiff since it will no longer be possible to rent or sell the vehicle *(see, Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v Atlas Co.,*165 AD2d 851). Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to the sum of $6,263.37 which represents the liquidated damages. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Brown and Balletta, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 99

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of CheckFree Holdings Corporation
and Subsidiaries:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of CheckFree Holdings
Corporation and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1998 and 1999, and for the years
ended June 30, 1997, 1998 and 1999, and have issued our report thereon dated
August 9, 1999 (except for Note 22 as to which the date is May 5, 2000); such
financial statements and report are included in your 1999 Annual Report to
Stockholders and are incorporated herein by reference. Our audits also included
the financial statement schedule of CheckFree Holdings Corporation and
Subsidiaries, listed in Item 14. This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
August 9, 1999
<PAGE>   2
                       VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

                FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, 1998 and 1999


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  BALANCE AS     AMOUNT       CHARGES
                                      OF       ASSUMED IN     TO COSTS    CHARGES TO
                                  BEGINNING     BUSINESS        AND         OTHER                   BALANCE AS OF
                                  OF PERIOD    COMBINATION    EXPENSES    DEDUCTIONS   DEDUCTIONS   END OF PERIOD
                                  ----------  ------------   ---------   -----------   ----------   -------------
<S>                               <C>           <C>          <C>         <C>            <C>         <C>
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
    1997.....................       $2,279        1,000         9,196           --        8,258         4,217
    1998.....................        4,217          --          3,441           --        4,188         3,470
    1999.....................        3,470          309         1,246           --          595         4,430
Reserve for Returns and Chargebacks
    1997.....................          543          --          1,920           --        1,237         1,226
    1998.....................        1,226          --          2,080           --        1,362         1,944
    1999.....................        1,944          --          1,932           --        2,212         1,664
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1** **CHIEF    EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**     I, Mitchell C. Hill, certify that:     1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of Avanade Inc. for the period ended November 30, 2007, as    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date    hereof;     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other    financial information included in this report, fairly present in    all material respects the financial condition, results of    operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the    periods presented in this report;     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:      a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during    the period in which this report is being prepared;      b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure    controls and procedures and presented in this report our    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this    report based on such evaluation; and      c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during    the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the    registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to    materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over    financial reporting; and     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have    disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):      a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and      b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or    other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: January 14, 2008 /s/  Mitchell    C. Hill    Mitchell C. Hill    Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 LEGACY BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Rule 13a  14(a) / 15d-14(a)
 I, J. Williar Dunlaevy, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Legacy Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: August 11, 2006
    
    /s/ J. Williar DunlaevyJ. Williar DunlaevyChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
<PAGE> 1

               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                          FORM 10-K/A



     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
            For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999


Purpose:  To supplement in part Part IV, Item 14(c) of Company's
          previously filed Form 10-K in order to file as an
          exhibit the Annual Servicing Report of Company's
          Independent Public Accountants.

                   Commission File No. 0-28110

              HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN TRUST 1995-1
     (Exact name of Registrant as specified in Department
      of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4)


                   HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
                    (Administrator of the Trust)
       (Exact name as specified in Administrator's charter)



            DELAWARE                      36-3670374
(State or other jurisdiction of       (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation of Administrator)    Identification Number of
                                   Registrant)


 2700 SANDERS ROAD, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS         60070
(Address of principal executive offices of           (Zip Code)
Administrator)


Administrator's telephone number including area code (847)564-5000



<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

                           SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Servicer has duly caused this
report to be signed on behalf of the Household Consumer Loan Trust
1995-1 by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




                             HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                         as Administrator of and on behalf of the

                          HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN TRUST 1995-1
                                    (Registrant)




Date:  May 8, 2000       By: /s/ John W. Blenke
                                 John W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary

















<PAGE>
<PAGE> 3


                           Exhibit Index


Exhibit No.    Exhibit

99             Copy of Independent Public Accountants Annual Servicing
               Report dated March 28, 2000.
#### Manuel S. Martinez, Appellant, v Christopher Suozzi, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), entered on or about January 15, 1991, which, *inter alia,*denied plaintiff’s motion *412for partial summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The plaintiff, who claims that he was fraudulently induced to purchase the subject premises by representations that all of the tenancies were rent stabilized and not rent controlled, moved for "partial summary judgment” seeking a declaration of seven specific underlying facts, four of which are admitted in defendant Suozzi’s Responses to Plaintiffs Notice to Admit, and are no longer in dispute for the purposes of the pending action *(see,*CPLR 3123). As to the remaining allegations on which the plaintiff seeks summary disposition, there is a triable issue of fact as to whether or not the plaintiff justifiably relied on the alleged representations *(see, e.g., Yuzwak v Dygert,*144 AD2d 938), as well as to whether or not plaintiff could have discovered the true facts *(see, e.g., Black v Chittenden,*69 NY2d 665). Also, a triable issue of fact as to the rent regulated status of the subject apartments is created by documents submitted on an unrelated motion by defendant Zegen, suggesting that the apartments were rent stabilized.

Discovery should proceed as ordered. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.
June 10 , 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KATRINA BURNETT AND FREDERICK BURNETT , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 12

- 01159

- CV V.

CARNES FUNERAL HOME, I NC. AND CREMATE TEXA S, INC. , Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee s , Carnes Funeral Home, Inc. and Cremate Texas, Inc., signed November 2 , 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. W e have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We further order that appellees’ motion for sanctions is DENIED

. We order appellant s , Katrina Burnett and Frederick Burnett, jointly and

seve rally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.