alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form of Stock Option Cancellation Agreement


 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 STOCK OPTION 
 CANCELLATION AGREEMENT 
 ‘This Stock Option Cancellation Agreement is made effective as of the 4th day of January, 2007 between Renovis, Inc. (the “Company”) and [            ]
(the “Optionee”). 
 WHEREAS, on the dates set forth on Exhibit A, the Optionee was granted options (the
“Options”) to purchase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock set forth on Exhibit A (the “Shares”) at the per share exercise prices set forth on Exhibit A pursuant to the Company’s Amended and
Restated 2003 Stock Plan (the “2003 Stock Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to cancel the Options and the Optionee
desires to relinquish any right, title or interest the Optionee may have in or to the Options, the Shares subject to the Options, and any agreement, written or oral, relating to the Options (each an “Option Agreement”). 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and undertakings contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Optionee agree as follows: 
 1. Effective as of the date hereof, and upon payment by the
Company of $0.001 per share, the Optionee shall surrender the Options to the Company for cancellation and hereby waives, relinquishes and gives up any and all right, title or interest that the Optionee may have in or to the Options and the Shares
subject thereto, as well as any right, title or interest in or under any Option Agreement. 
 2. The Company, upon payment of the agreed-upon
consideration, is hereby relieved of all of its obligations to the Optionee under the Options and any Option Agreement. Shares reserved for issuance under the Options shall become available for future grants under the Company’s 2003 Stock Plan
without shareholder approval in accordance with Rule 4350(i)(1)(A) of the Rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and interpretative guidance issued thereunder. 
 3. For the avoidance of doubt, the Optionee, in surrendering and relinquishing all right, title or interest in the Options, has no expectation, whether
express, implied, or otherwise, of receiving future options grants or other equity-based awards from the Company, and the Company is under no obligation, whether express, implied, or otherwise, to grant future options to purchase shares or other
equity-based awards to the Optionee. 
 (signature page follows) 






 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Optionee have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date
and year first above written. 
  

			
	RENOVIS, INC.
		
	By:	 	  

		
	Its:	 	  

	
	OPTIONEE
	
	  
 (Signature)

	
	  
 (Print Name)









 EXHIBIT A 
 STOCK OPTION GRANTS 
  

							
	 Stock Option
 Grant Number
	 	 Grant Date
	 	 Number of
 Shares
	 	 Exercise Price
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [NRC-2011-0286]

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

Draft regulatory guide; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is correcting a notice appearing in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 15, 2012 (77 FR 8751), that re-opened the public comment period for Draft Regulatory Guide (DG)-4014, “Decommissioning Planning During Operations.” This action is necessary to correct the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) accession number for accessing DG-4014 in the                         **ADDRESSES**                         section of this document.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch, Office of Administration, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone: 301-492-3667; email:                         *Cindy.Bladey@nrc.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On page 8751 of                     **Federal Register**                     document 2012-3522, published February 15, 2012 (77 FR 8751), in the second column, the second bullet from the bottom, last sentence, under the section titled                     **ADDRESSES**                    , “ML110960051” is corrected to read “ML111590642.”                

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of February 2012.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Cindy Bladey,

Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration.

[FR Doc. 2012-5658 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1825 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1825

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
   To extend the authority for relocation expenses test programs for 
               Federal employees, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RELOCATION EXPENSES TEST PROGRAMS.
    (a) In General.--Section 5739 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
        (1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (3);
        (2) in subsection (b)--
            (A) by inserting ``or extended'' after ``approved''; and
            (B) by inserting ``or extension'' after ``of the program'';
        (3) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:
    ``(c)(1) An agency authorized to conduct a test program under 
subsection (a) shall annually submit a report on the results of the 
program to date to the Administrator.
    ``(2) Not later than 3 months after completion of a test program, 
the agency conducting the program shall submit a final report on the 
results of the program to the Administrator and the appropriate 
committees of Congress.'';
        (4) in subsection (d), by striking ``10'' and inserting ``12''; 
    and
        (5) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following:
    ``(e)(1) The Administrator may not approve any test program for an 
initial period of more than 4 years.
    ``(2)(A) Upon the request of the agency administering a test 
program, the Administrator may extend the program.
    ``(B) An extension under subparagraph (A) may not exceed 4 years.
    ``(C) The Administrator may exercise more than 1 extension under 
subparagraph (A) with respect to any test program.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on December 18, 
2009.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
23 December 2009

The Honorable Lisa P. Jackson

EPA Administrator

USEPA Headquarters

Ariel Rios Building

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.

Mail Code:1101A

Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Fly Ash as a "Hazardous Waste"

Dear Ms. Jackson:

Enclosed please find a letter from ASTM International Committee C09 on Concrete and 

Concrete Aggregates and its Subcommittee C09.24 Supplementary Cementitious Materials. 

The letter was unanimously approved by the members in attendance at the C09 Main

Committee and C09.24 Subcommittee at their meeting in Atlanta, GA, this month, and 

subsequently approved by the C09.90 Executive Subcommittee.

ASTM Committee C09 on Concrete and Concrete Aggregates was formed in 1914. The 

Committee, with current membership of approximately 1200, currently has jurisdiction over 155

standards, published in the Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 4.02. These standards

are essential to the integrity of the Nation's civil infrastructure

If you have any questions, please contact the C09 Staff Manager, W. Scott Orthey at

sorthey@astm.org, 610-832-9730.

Sincerely,

James A. Thomas

cc: The C09 Executive Subcommittee
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Michael Ricciutti, Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 1, 1990, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Upon reopening its decision for the sole purpose of determining whether there was compliance with the consent judgment in *Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin*(79 Civ 5899), the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found no substantial procedural violations and it therefore adhered to its original decision disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. We agree with the Board that claimant’s contentions in this regard are meritless and, therefore, affirmance is required *(see, e.g., Matter of Ferri [Roberts],*114 AD2d 743). The record indicates that, although claimant missed the very beginning of the employer’s testimony, the Administrative Law Judge gave a summary of the brief testimony upon claimant’s late arrival. In addition, although claimant contends that he was not informed of certain rights when he first appeared, soon thereafter the Administrative Law Judge not only told claimant of his right to cross-examine, but claimant’s request for witnesses was granted as was his request for an adjournment. Finally, with respect to claimant’s contention that he was denied the right to call all expert witnesses, because claimant admitted that a medical injury was not the reason he gave his employer for not returning to work the additional expert testimony would have been irrelevant *(see, Armetta v General Motors Corp.,*158 AD2d 284, 286).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Weiss, J. P., Yesawich, Jr., Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
December 12, 2013

On December 12, 2013, Dan Cohen, Ami Grace

- Tardy and Michael Kido (all of DOE, Office of the General Counsel) contacted Clark Silcox (NEMA’s general counsel) to clarify some of the comments made by John Malinowski and other NEMA members at the December 11, 2013, public meeting on DOE’s proposed standards for electric motors (Docket No. EERE

- 2010 -BT- STD

- 0027). Specifically, the group discussed how NEMA should s ubmit comments on the definition s of electric motors subject to standards.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Reza Zarif, certify that:  1.   I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  of  Probe Manufacturing,  Inc.;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a  material  fact  or  omit  to state a material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the period covered by this report;  3.   Based on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in  all material respects  the  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this report;  4.   The registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating to the registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which  this  report  is  being  prepared;  b)   evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure controls  and  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the  end  of  the  period  covered  by  this  report based on such evaluation;  and  c)   disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most  recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the  case  of  an  annual  report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the registrant's internal control  over  financial  reporting;  and  5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):  a)   all significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are  reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information; and  b)   any fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management or other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the registrant's  internal  control  over  financial  reporting.    DATED  this  14th day  of  May 14, 2007.   /s/  Reza Zarif __________________________ Reza Zarif Chief  Executive  Officer  and Director
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, James B. Hersch, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Century Petroleum Corp.; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated: September 14, 2007

 

/s/ James B. Hersch                                                                      

James B. Hersch, President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129222 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129222 COA: 262026 Calhoun CC: 04-001719-FH JAMES WYATT BOOTH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e July 21, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 26, 2022

NO. 03

- 21

- 00349

- CV

S. P. , Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFOR E CH IEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order terminating parental rights signed by the tr i a l court on

September 9, 2021

. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds

that there was no reversible error in the order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the t rial court’s

terminati o n order

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of

costs is made.
# L_2006113EN.01000301.xml

| 27.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 113/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 113/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 638/2006

of 26 April 2006

specifying the extent to which applications lodged in April 2006 for import certificates in respect of young male bovine animals for fattening as part of a tariff quota provided for in Regulation (EC) No 992/2005 may be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 992/2005 of 29 June 2005 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota for young male bovine animals for fattening (1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006) (2), and in particular Articles 1(4) and 4 thereof,

Whereas:

Article 1(3)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 992/2005 lays down the number of young male bovine animals which may be imported on special terms during the period from 1 April to 30 June 2006. The quantities covered by import licence applications submitted are such that applications may by accepted in full,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

All applications for import certificates made in the month of April 2006 pursuant to Article 3(3), second subparagraph, third indent, of Regulation (EC) No 992/2005 are hereby met in full.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 April 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 168, 30.6.2005, p. 16.

2

---
Bonus Structure for Kent J. Thirty



 Exhibit 10.6 

MEMORANDUM RELATING TO BONUS STRUCTURE 

FOR 
 KENT J. THIRY

 On March 31, 2010, the Company agreed to pay Mr. Thiry, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, a
relocation bonus in the amount of $200,000 per year for 2010, 2011 and 2012 to support Mr. Thiry’s transition to Denver, Colorado. Such amount is in addition to amounts which Mr. Thiry is otherwise eligible to receive under his
employment agreement with the Company.
# L_2006200EN.01000501.xml

| 22.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 200/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 200/5

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 11 July 2006

appointing a Czech alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2006/509/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Czech Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC (1) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC (1) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010.

| (2) | A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Ivan KOSATÍK, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Ivan KOSATÍK,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Pavel HORÁK, Deputy President of the Olomouc Region, is hereby appointed an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions in place of Mr Ivan KOSATÍK for the remainder of his term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2006.

For the Council

The President

E. HEINÄLUOMA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---