alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007006EN.01000501.xml

| 11.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4301 — Alliance Boots/Cardinal Health)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 6/09)

On 22 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4301. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4301. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
# L_2006316EN.01003501.xml

| 16.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 316/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 316/35

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 584/2006 of 10 April 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 1480/2003 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain electronic microcircuits known as DRAMs (dynamic random access memories) originating in the Republic of Korea

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 103 of 12 April 2006
  )

On page 25, in Nos 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the table in Article 1(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1480/2003:

for:

‘Multi-combinational forms of DRAMs ...’,

read:

‘(Non-customised) multi-combinational forms of DRAMs ...’;

and in Nos 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the table in Article 1(3), of Regulation (EC) No 1480/2003:

for:

‘... price of the multi-combinational form of DRAM’,

read:

‘... price of the (non-customised) multi-combinational form of DRAM’.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2022 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2022

To extend the temporary duty reduction on certain pepperoncini prepared 
                        or preserved by vinegar.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary duty reduction on certain pepperoncini prepared 
                        or preserved by vinegar.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PEPPERONCINI PREPARED OR PRESERVED BY VINEGAR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.29 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to pepperoncini prepared or 
preserved by vinegar) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Eddie Michael UNDERWOOD, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 860044.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 21, 1987.

Robert Froerer, Ogden, for defendant and appellant.

Sandra Sjogren, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

*996PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from a conviction of second degree murder, a first degree felony under Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-203 (1978). We affirm.

The 38-year-old defendant was charged with the stabbing death of a 16-year-old boy. At trial, defendant claimed that he acted in self-defense and that he was justified in the use of deadly force. A jury of his peers convicted him as charged.

In reviewing a defendant’s conviction, we do not substitute our judgment for that of the jury. *State v. Booker,*709 P.2d 342, 345 (Utah 1985). It is the exclusive function of the jury to weigh the evidence and to determine the credibility of the witnesses. *Id.*

This Court has undertaken an independent review of the voluminous trial record. Defendant’s relatives and friends related the incident that resulted in the death of the boy in a different light than the independent witnesses who testified for the State. Defendant took the stand and testified that he acted in self-defense. His testimony contradicted that of numerous witnesses for the State. Contradictory testimony, without more, is not grounds for reversal. *State v. Buel,*700 P.2d 701 (Utah 1985); *accord State v. Loe,*732 P.2d 115 (Utah 1987). When there is any evidence, including reasonable inferences that can be drawn from it, from which findings of all the requisite elements of the crime can be reasonably made, our inquiry stops and we sustain the verdict. *State v. Booker,*709 P.2d at 345; *State v. McClain,*706 P.2d 603, 605 (Utah 1985); *State v. McCardell,*652 P.2d 942 (Utah 1982).

Without reciting the facts in this case, this Court holds that there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant committed the crime with which he was charged.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David E. Snyder, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 11, 2009



| |  |  |  |                        
| |  |  |  | -----------------------
| |  |  |  | /s/ David E.
Snyder    
| |  |  |  | David E. Snyder        
| |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH DISTRICT, AT EL PASO

No. 08-17-00110-CV

Maria Arambula

v.

Manuel Y. Enriquez and Angela Enriquez

(No. 2012DCV05646 IN 243RD DISTRICT COURT OF EL PASO COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

CLERK'S RECORD

FILING $10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$27.00

$32.00

$205.00 E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

PAID TONY AGUILAR

TONY AGUILAR

TONY AGUILAR

ANTHONY C. AGUILAR

Balance of costs owing to the Eighth Court of Appeals, El Paso, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DENISE PACHECO

, CLERK OF THE EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and

correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH

DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and

styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Eighth District of Texas, this 5/23/18.

Denise Pacheco, Clerk
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ATI Jet Sales, LLC., 

 

 Appellant,

City of El Paso, Texas and Maria O. 

Pasillas, Tax Assessor - Collector, City of 

El Paso,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No.08-21-00208-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 6

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2021DCV1168)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee’s third motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until December 12, 2022. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLEE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jose Padilla, the Appellee’s attorney, prepare the 

Appellee’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before December 12, 2022. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5

th day of December, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of CheckFree Corporation:

CheckFree Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation
CheckFree Investment Corporation, a Delaware corporation
CheckFree Management Corporation, a Wisconsin corporation
CheckFree i-Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation
CheckFree i-Solutions International, Inc., a Michigan corporation*
CheckFree i-Solutions Corporation, an Ontario corporation*
CheckFree i-Solutions Australia Pty. Ltd., a Victoria, Australia proprietary
  company
CheckFree i-Solutions Limited, a United Kingdom private limited company
CheckFree International Partner Inc., a Delaware corporation
CheckFree Finance, Inc., a Washington corporation
CheckFree TransPoint Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation
CheckFree International, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership*
CheckFree, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company*
TransPoint Technology & Services, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company**
TransPoint, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company**
TransPoint Accounting, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company***

*indicates second tier subsidiary
**indicates third tier subsidiary
***indicates fourth tier subsidiary
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         Each director and/or officer of CheckFree Corporation (the
"Corporation") whose signature appears below hereby appoints Peter J. Kight,
Peter F. Sinisgalli, and Curtis A. Loveland as the undersigned's attorneys or
any of them individually as the undersigned's attorney, to sign, in the
undersigned's name and behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to
cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K")
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000, and likewise to sign and file with the
Commission any and all amendments to the Form 10-K, and the Corporation hereby
also appoints such persons as its attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its
attorney-in-fact with like authority to sign and file the Form 10-K and any
amendments thereto granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power of
substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such
attorney-in-fact or the undersigned's substitute may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 20th day of
September, 2000.

Signature                           Title

    /s/Peter J. Kight               Chairman of the Board of Directors and
--------------------------------    Chief Executive Officer
     Peter J. Kight                 (Principal Executive Officer)


    /s/David Mangum                 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
--------------------------------    Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
     David Mangum


    /s/Gary A. Luoma, Jr.           Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and
--------------------------------    Assistant Secretary
     Gary A. Luoma, Jr.             (Principal Accounting Officer)



    /s/William P. Boardman          Director
--------------------------------
     William P. Boardman

    /s/James D. Dixon               Director
--------------------------------
     James D. Dixon

                                    Director
--------------------------------
     Henry C. Duques

    /s/Mark A. Johnson              Director
--------------------------------
     Mark A. Johnson

                                    Director
--------------------------------
     Lewis C. Levin

    /s/George R. Manser             Director
--------------------------------
     George R. Manser

    /s/Eugene F. Quinn              Director
--------------------------------
     Eugene F. Quinn

    /s/Jeffrey M. Wilkins           Director
--------------------------------
     Jeffrey M. Wilkins
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Sayles, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.), rendered March 17, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt in view of inconsistencies in the testimony of the prosecution’s witnesses, each of whom was a police officer. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Furthermore, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94; *People v Cade,*167 AD2d 552). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). Kooper, J. P., Harwood, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

# AGENCY:

National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be held by teleconference at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20506 as follows (ending time is approximate): Media Arts (application review): March 16, 2012. This meeting, from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. EDT, will be closed.

# DATES:

March 16, 2012, from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. EDT.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Further information with reference to these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of February 15, 2012, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.

Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory panels that are open to the public, and if time allows, may be permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel chairman. If you need any accommodations due to a disability, please contact the Office of Accessibility, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.

Dated: March 2, 2012. 

Kathy Plowitz-Worden,

Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. 2012-5524 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID

ASRAC Commercial HVAC, CRE, and WH 

Working Group: Meeting and Webinar

545355816

Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) 

Jul 02, 2013 07:13 AM EDT 294

Total Attended

16

Session Details

First Name Last Name Email Country Address City Industry State Organization Zip Code

Rodney Beever US 491 E. Princess St. York Manufacturing PA United CoolAir Corp. 17403

Jeremiah Freeman US DOE Washington Consulting DC New West Technologies 20585

Marshall Hunt US 245 Market Street San Francisco Energy, Chemical, 

Utilities

CA Pacific Gas & Electric Co 94105

Dominic Kolandayan US 1645 Wallace Dr Carrollton Manufacturing TX Daikin AC (Americas), Inc. 75006

Stephen Kowalski US 2701 Wilma Rudolph 

Blvd.

Clarksville Manufacturing TN Ingersoll Rand - Trane North 

America

37040

Steven Maddox US 5005 York Drive Norman Manufacturing OK Johnson Controls Inc. 73069

John Mclaughlin US john.mclaughlin@daikinmc

quay.com

Auburn Manufacturing NY Daikin McQuay 13021

David Mecadon US 539 Dunksferry Road Bensalem Manufacturing PA National Refrigeration and Air 

Conditioning

19020

John Morris US 539 Dunksferry rd Bensalem Manufacturing PA Continetal Refrigerator 19020

Frank Myers US 3209 Galvez Ave Fort Worth Manufacturing TX PVI Industries, LLC 76063

Dean Swofford US 1925 Ruffin Mill Rd Colonial Heights Manufacturing VA Hillphoenix 23112

Chris Thompson US 2175 West Park Place 

Blvd.

Stone Mountain Manufacturing GA Heatcraft 30087

Eric Truskoski US 200 Lafayette Street Middleville Manufacturing MI Bradford White Corporation 49333

Tom Walsh US 4900 Technolgy Park Blvd Auburn Other NY Daikin McQuay 13021

Michael Woodford US 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite # 

500

Arlington Manufacturing VA AHRI 22201

Wes Wostal US 7300 SW 44th St Oklahoma City Manufacturing OK ClimateMaster 73179

General Information
Exhibit 31.1



LEGACY BANCORP, INC.



CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Rule 13a
 14(a) / 15d-14(a)



I, J. Williar Dunlaevy, certify
that:



|1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Legacy Bancorp, Inc.;
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  | /s/ J. Williar Dunlaevy                          
|                       |  | J. Williar Dunlaevy                              
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board



5