alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0647 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2010-NM-193-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Walter Byas, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J., at *Wade*hearing, jury trial and sentence) convicting defendant of four counts of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him as a predicate felony offender to consecutive terms of 12 *Vi*to 25 years imprisonment on each count, commencing upon defendant’s completion of outstanding concurrent sentences on two prior Bronx County robbery convictions, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to be present at the hearing and trial by his abusive behavior directed toward his appointed counsel and the court, by insisting that he did not wish to be present, and by stating that he would continue to "act up” if compelled to remain in the courtroom *(Snyder v Massachusetts,*291 US 97).

The trial court properly denied defendant’s eleventh hour *315application for a substitution of attorneys after reviewing the matter in detail and determining that defendant’s attack on the experienced trial counsel’s competence was meritless. Reviewing the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of the case, it is clear that defense counsel rendered comprehensive and vigorous advocacy on behalf of defendant, which admirably comported with accepted standards for effective assistance of counsel *(see, People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137).

Likewise without merit is defendant’s claim that the hearing court erroneously denied his application to call the complainants to testify at the *Wade*hearing. As the hearing court noted, there were no indicia that the identification procedures were suggestive in any way, and in such circumstances defendant does not have an absolute right to call a complainant *(see, e.g., People v Peterkin,*75 NY2d 985).

Evidence adduced at trial presented overwhelming proof of defendant’s guilt in four knifepoint robberies during a six-week period, during which he threatened the lives of the female victims and two children who happened to accompany two of the victims. Combined with the trial court’s review at sentencing of defendant’s probation report and extensive prior violent criminal history, we perceive no abuse of discretion by the trial court in imposing sentence *(see, e.g., People v Junco,*43 AD2d 266, *affd*35 NY2d 419, *cert denied*421 US 951). However, we note that pursuant to the provisions of Penal Law § 70.30, the aggregate of the four consecutive sentences imposed upon defendant will be deemed, automatically, to constitute a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years imprisonment (Penal Law § 70.30 [1] [c] [iii]; *see also, People v Moore,*61 NY2d 575). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-564]



[[Page 2075]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Initial Review Group NST-1 Subcommittee.
    Date: January 30-31, 2012.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Fairmont Washington, DC, 2401 M Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Raul A. Saavedra, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, 
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, NSC, 
6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529 Bethesda, MD 20892-9529 
(301) 496-9223, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#16657777607372646456787f78726538787f7e38717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9eedffffe8fbfaececdef0f7f0faedb0f0f7f6b0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 6, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-564 Filed 1-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# L_2006261EN.01002601.xml

| 22.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 261/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 261/26

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 4 April 2006

on the conclusion, by way of signature, of an Agreement for Co-operation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine

(2006/635/Euratom)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 101 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision of 24 September 2004, approving the conclusion by the Commission of an Agreement for Co-operation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The Agreement for Co-operation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine should be concluded. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Agreement for Co-operation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine should be concluded.

| (2) | The Commission should designate the person authorised to sign the Agreement for Co-operation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy for the European Atomic Energy Community, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Commission should designate the person authorised to sign the Agreement for Co-operation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy for the European Atomic Energy Community,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The conclusion of the Agreement for Co-operation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine is hereby decided on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community.

The text of the agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The Member responsible for Energy, or the person designated by him for this purpose, is hereby authorised to sign on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community the Agreement for Co-operation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine.

Done at Brussels, 4 April 2006.

For the Commission

Andris PIEBALGS

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.

1

---
Rupprecht Law P. A. 

324 Datura Street, Suite 200 | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

P: (561) 222-6979 | E: jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com 

July 28, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sir or Madam:

IMCO General Construction, Inc. (FAA-2015-2584) confidentially submitted to 

333exemptions@faa.gov on July 21, 2015 and obtained receipt on July 23, 2015 for the following 

documents:

1) Flight Operations & Procedures Manual

2) Aircraft Flight Manual - DJI Phantom 2

3) Aircraft Flight Manual - DJI Phantom 3

4) PIC Qualification Process, Test & Logbook

5) VO Qualification Process & Test

If I can be of any assistance to further expedite this petition, please do not hesitate to contact me 

at (561)222-6979 or at my email jon@jrupprechtlaw.com

Sincerely yours,

_____________________

Jonathan Rupprecht, Esq.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances (OPPTS)

1200 Pennsylvania A

venue, NW Washingto n, DC 20460 

### D OCKET 

### V ERIFICA

TION AND 

### C ERTIFICA TION 

### F ORM For Internal OPPTS Use Only Title of Action : Notice of Filing of a Pesticide Petition for the Establishment of Tolerances for Residues of

Thiamethoxam in Food/Feed Handling Areas of Food/Feed Handli ng Establishments RIN # : Docket ID # : EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2010

- 0 60 2 FRL# : Docket Title : Thiamethoxam; Food/Feed Handling Areas of Food/Feed Handling Establishments Contact Information : Name : Kable Bo Davis Phone # : 703
- 306
- 0415 Legacy Information : Program Lead’s Verification : I have reviewed the docket and verified the following: All of the documents identified in the attached Docket Index have been submitted to the appropriate Docket Manager for inclusion in the docket identified above. Documen ts containing copyrighted, CBI, or otherwise protected information have been identified to allow for “special” processing by the appropriate Docket Staff. The material has been assembled in a useable form to support the document being published in the FEDE RAL REGISTER (FR). COMMENTS :

. Date: 07/14/10 Initials: Kable Bo Davis Phone #: 703
- 306
- 0415 Docket Manager’s Verification and Sign
- off : I hereby confirm t he following: The Docket ID # identified above matches our records. The documents identi fied in the attached Docket Index have been received by the OPP Docket Staff. The documents have been properly processed for inclusion in EPA FDMS Dockets, as appropriate. The documents either already are in the docket or are being processed for inclusion in the docket. COMMENTS: Date: Signature: Phone #: Program Lead’s Certification : I hereby certify that: I have completed the verification above. I have submitted to the Docket Manager all of the documents that I identified needed to be updated o r added to the docket. I have obtained the Docket Manager’s sign

- off. The docket is complete and ready for public release. COMMENTS: Date : 07/14/10 Signature: Kable Bo Davis Phone #: 703
- 306
- 0415 At tachment : List of Documents for Docket ID # EPA
- HQ
- 2010
- 0 60 2 as of July 14, 2010 Document Title Source Information: Author (Last, First Name); Organization; Citation Date of Document 1) CBI 2) Other

Protected, e.g., Studies 3) Copyrighted 1. Notice of Filing of a Pesticide Petition for the Establishment of Tolerances for Residues of Thiamethoxam in Food/Feed Handling Areas of Food/Feed Handling Establishments Syngenta Crop Protection P.O. Box 18300 Greensboror, NC 27419 N/A

2.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 2, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

134461 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver In re Estate of ALICE J. RAYMOND, Deceased. Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan

________________ _______________ __________/ Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, CLAIR MORSE, Justices Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 134461 COA: 267364 Lenawee Probate: 05-044839-DE VALERIE SHARKEY, GAIL THOMAS, GARY ZEIGLER, DEANNA CONANT, CARYN NUZHET, JAY CURRY, MARY JEAN MANDELA, JOHN PACKARD, FRANK PACKARD, LISA MORSE, ELLIOTT GUILLORY, ROBERT McCLELLAND, BEVERLY CLEMENT, DAVID MORSE, JUDITH FROELICK, PHILLIP MORSE, JOAN SUMMERS, JANICE FALKEY, DONALD MORSE, MARVIN STULL, ER IC STULL, FRANK BRIGGS, JOANNE CARTER, and MARILYN RIGEL, Respondents-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 7, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take ot her peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs with in 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether the will’s language is sufficient to convey the possibility that the class of “brother[s] and sisters that survive me” might have no members; (2) whether the langua ge “or to the survivor or survivors thereof” creates an

alternative devise to the des cendants of predeceased siblings of the testator (or Claude Raymond) which only takes effect if all of the testator’s (or Cl aude Raymond’s) siblings predecease the testator; (3) wh at significance, if any, sh ould be attributed to the placement of the language “share and share a like” in the middle of the pertinent clause, rather than at the end; and (4) what effect, if any, the antilapse st atute (MCL 700.2603)

should have on the constructi on of the will language at issu e. The partie s should not

submit mere restatements of their application papers.

d0429 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 2, 2008

Clerk
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1948 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3,4-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. ISAKSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3,4- 

Dimethoxybenzaldehyde. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 3,4-DIMETHOXYBENZALDEHYDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.56 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 3,4-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde) is amended by striking ‘‘12/ 

7 31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1948 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
#### Hartman, Appellee, *v.*The Clinton County National Bank *&*Trust Co., Exr., et al.; Hartman, Appellant.

(No. 30961

Decided March 26, 1947.)

*Mr. G. L. Schilling*and *Mr. Clinton II. Nichols,*for appellee.

*Mr. George S. Hawke,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged, *sua sponte,*that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
# C_2006199EN.01000201.xml

| 24.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/2

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4344 — Lactalis/Nestlé)

(2006/C 199/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 14 August 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Groupe Lactalis S.A. (Lactalis, France) and the undertaking Nestlé S.A. (Nestlé, Switzerland) create, within the meaning of Articles 3(4) and 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation, a joint venture (hereafter, ‘the Undertaking’) by way of transfer of assets. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 14 August 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Groupe Lactalis S.A. (Lactalis, France) and the undertaking Nestlé S.A. (Nestlé, Switzerland) create, within the meaning of Articles 3(4) and 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation, a joint venture (hereafter, ‘the Undertaking’) by way of transfer of assets.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for Lactalis: food company, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for Lactalis: food company,

| — | for Nestlé: food company, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Nestlé: food company,

| — | for the Undertaking: dairy products. |
| --- | --- |

—

for the Undertaking: dairy products.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4344 — Lactalis/Nestlé, to the ollowing address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4344 — Lactalis/Nestlé, to the ollowing address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**AULTRA
      GOLD INC.**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Aultra Gold Inc. (the Company) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Baljinder Bhullar,
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company **** and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




Date: September
                6, 2007
            By:
            /s/ 
                *Baljinder Bhullar*Baljinder
                BhullarChief
                Financial Officer