alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 189 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1927 

To establish a moratorium on credit card interest rate increases, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. DODD (for himself, Mr. REED, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. 

BROWN, Mr. TESTER, Mr. MERKLEY, and Mr. UDALL of Colorado) introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

OCTOBER 27, 2009 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To establish a moratorium on credit card interest rate 

increases, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Credit Card Rate 

5 Freeze Act of 2009’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1927 PCS

1 SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON RATE INCREASES. 

2 During the period beginning on the date of enactment 

3 of this Act and ending 9 months after the date of enact4 ment of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and 

5 Disclosure Act of 2009, in the case of any credit card ac6 count under an open end consumer credit plan— 

7 (1) no creditor may increase any annual per8 centage rate, fee, or finance charge applicable to any 

9 outstanding balance, except as permitted under sub10 section 171(b) of the Truth in Lending Act (as 

11 added by Public Law 111-24); and 

12 (2) no creditor may change the terms governing 

13 the repayment of any outstanding balance, except as 

14 set forth in section 171(c) of the Truth in Lending 

15 Act (as added by Public Law 111-24). 

16 SEC. 3. DEFINED TERMS. 

17 For purposes of this Act— 

18 (1) the term ‘‘annual percentage rate’’ means 

19 an annual percentage rate, as determined under sec20 tion 107 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

21 1606); 

22 (2) the term ‘‘finance charge’’ means a finance 

23 charge, as determined under section 106 of the 

24 Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1605); 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1927 PCS

1 (3) the term ‘‘outstanding balance’’ has the 

2 same meaning as in section 171(d) of the Truth in 

3 Lending Act (as added by Public Law 111-24); and 

4 (4) the terms used in this Act that are defined 

5 in section 103 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 

6 U.S.C. 1602) and are not otherwise defined in this 

7 Act shall have the same meanings as in section 103 

8 of the Truth in Lending Act. 

9 SEC. 4. REGULATORY AUTHORITY. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Board of Governors of the 

11 Federal Reserve System may issue such rules as may be 

12 necessary to carry out this Act. 

13 (b) DATE OF ENACTMENT.—The provisions of this 

14 Act shall take effect upon the date of enactment of this 

15 Act, regardless of whether rules are issued under sub16 section (a). 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 189 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1927 

A BILL 

To establish a moratorium on credit card interest 

rate increases, and for other purposes. 

OCTOBER 27, 2009 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**




**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Platinum Energy Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
      that:




The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the
      “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained
      in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
              November 17, 2006,
            By:
            /s/
              Mark
              NordlichtMark Nordlicht
              Chairman of the
                Board




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2006324EN.01000701.xml

| 23.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 324/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 324/7

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 13 November 2006

on the European Capital of Culture event for the year 2010

(2006/796/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Decision No 1419/1999/EC of 25 May 1999 of the European Parliament and the Council establishing a Community action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2005 to 2019 (1), and in particular Articles 2 paragraph 3 and 4, thereof,

Having regard to the Selection Panel report of April 2006 submitted to the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with Article 2 paragraph 2 of Decision 1419/1999/EC,

Considering that the criteria laid down in Article 3 and Annex II of Decision No 1419/1999/EC are entirely fulfilled,

Having regard to the recommendation from the Commission of 23 October 2006,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Essen and Pécs are designated as ‘European Capital of Culture 2010’ in accordance with Article 2 paragraph 1 of Decision No 1419/1999/EC as amended by Decision No 649/2005/EC.

Article 2

Istanbul is designated as a ‘European Capital of Culture 2010’ in accordance with Article 4 of Decision No 1419/1999/EC as amended by Decision No 649/2005/EC.

Article 3

All cities designated shall take the necessary measures in order to ensure the effective implementation of Articles 1 and 5 of Decision 1419/1999/EC as amended by Decision No 649/2005/EC.

Done at Brussels, 13 November 2006.

For the Council

The President

S. HUOVINEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 166, 1.7.1999, p. 1. As amended by Decision No 649/2005/EC (OJ L 117, 4.5.2005, p. 20).

1

---
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 24

- 11508
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
MCS OF TAMPA, INC., a Florida corporation,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus DAVID M. SNYDER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:24

- cv

- 00608

- WFJ

- CPT USCA11 Case: 24-11508 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 07/23/2024 Page: 1 of 32 Opinion of the Court 24

- 11508

____________________ Before R OSENBAUM , B RANCH , and L AGOA , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: David Snyder appeals from the district court’s two April 8, 2024 orders granting MCS of Tampa, Inc. ’s motion to remand and denying as moot Snyder’s motion to consolidate

. MCS moves to dismiss the appeal for l ack of jurisdiction. The remand order is not an appealable order because itgranted MCS’s timely motion to remand based on procedural defects in the removal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c), (d); New v. Sports & Recreation , 114 F.3d 1092, 1095

- 96 (11th Cir. 1997) ; Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Humana Med. Plan, Inc. , 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001) . Although Snyder argues that the exception for cases remov ed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or 1443 applies here, it does not. See 28 U.S.C. § 144 7 (d); BP p.l.c. v. Mayor of Balt. , 141 S. Ct. 1532, 1538 (2021) . The case was not removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or 1443 because h is notice of removal never referenced either statute, nor did it indicate that he was a federal officer or that he had been denied or was attempting to enforce a civil right of equality

. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442, 1443; Thompson v. Brown , 434 F.2d 1092, 1096 (5th Cir. 1970); Greenwood v. Peacock
, 384 U.S. 808, 824 & n.22 (1966)

. Snyder only stated that the action

was removable “pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1441

. ” Because we do not have jurisdiction to review the remand order, we are unable to provide meaningful relief regarding the USCA11 Case: 24-11508 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 07/23/2024 Page: 2 of 324

- 11508 Opinion of the Court 3 district court’s denial of Snyder’s motion to consolidate, and thus the app eal of that order is moot. See Christian Coal. of Fla., Inc. v. United States , 662 F.3d 1182, 1189 (11th Cir. 2011)

. Accordingly, MCS’s motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Snyder’s motion to supp lement the record is DENIED as moot. USCA11 Case: 24-11508 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 07/23/2024 Page: 3 of 3
# L_2006061EN.01001001.xml

| 2.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 61/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 61/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 364/2006

of 1 March 2006

fixing the import duties applicable to certain husked rice from 2 March 2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2004 of 30 August 2004 derogating from Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 as regards the import arrangements for importing rice and laying down separate transition rules for imports of basmati rice (1), and in particular Article 1,

Whereas:

| (1) | Based on the information provided by the competent authorities, the Commission notes that import licences for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 excluding import licences for Basmati rice have been issued in respect of 289 488 tonnes for 1 September 2005 to 28 February 2006. The import duty for semi-milled or wholly milled rice falling within CN code 1006 20, other than Basmati rice, must therefore be amended. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Based on the information provided by the competent authorities, the Commission notes that import licences for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 excluding import licences for Basmati rice have been issued in respect of 289 488 tonnes for 1 September 2005 to 28 February 2006. The import duty for semi-milled or wholly milled rice falling within CN code 1006 20, other than Basmati rice, must therefore be amended.

| (2) | As the applicable duty must be fixed no later than ten days from the end of the period referred to above, this Regulation must enter into force immediately, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As the applicable duty must be fixed no later than ten days from the end of the period referred to above, this Regulation must enter into force immediately,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The import duty for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 shall be EUR 65 per tonne.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 March 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 280, 31.8.2004, p. 13. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2152/2005 (OJ L 342, 24.12.2005, p. 30).

1

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
  Certification
    of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
    Officer
    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
    Act of 2002
  Form 10-Q
      /s/Mitchell
    C.
    Hill

/s/Dennis
    K.
    KnappMitchell C. Hill

Dennis K. KnappChief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer     A signed original of this written statement required by
    Section 906, or other document authenticating,
    acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
    in typed form within the electronic version of this written
    statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
    Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
    Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Adhem Nevins, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

In a proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6), the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Rossetti, J.), dated December 20, 1989, which denied his application.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Judge Rossetti in the Court of Claims. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Fiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
    This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statements of operations and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1995
<CASH>                                         13,641
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    144,033
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157,674
<PP&E>                                         1,606,659
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,783,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,271,945
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    5,963
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     482,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,783,303
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,601,822
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,121)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             36,784
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,600,110)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,600,110)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,600,110)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.27)
        


</TABLE>
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T J AN 19, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 10 78 0

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D. C. Dock etNo. 1 :0 9- cv -2 31 71 -AJ BKCY No . 07 -2 05 37 -BKC- AJC In Re: DB ISLAMORADA, LLC, Deb to r-i n- Po ss es si on .

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ DAVID FINNEGAN, W ILLIAM P. KELLY, JR., Pl ai nt iff s- App el la nt s,
ve rs us DB ISLAMORADA, LLC, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll ee.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e So ut he rn Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (J an ua ry 19 , 20 11 ) Befo re BARKETT, MARCUS an d F AY, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM:T his ap pe al in vo lv es a ch al le ng e to sa nc ti on s im po se d by th e Ban krup tc y Co ur t
on Dav id Fi nn eg an (cl ie nt ) an d W il li am P. Kell y , Jr
. (la wy er). W e ha ve st ud ie d th e
reco rdan d t he bri efs an d h av e h adth e b en efi t o f or al arg um en t. T he reco rdsi m pl y fai ls to su pp or t th e sa nc ti on s im po se d on Dav id Fi nn eg an . On th e ot he r ha nd , th ere is am pl e ev id en ce s up po rti ng th e sa nc ti on s i m po se d u po n Wil li am

P. Kell y , Jr. The sa nc ti on s im

po se d up on D a v i d F i nn eg an are va cat ed ; th e sa nc ti on s im po se d upo n Wil li am

P. Kell y , Jr. ar e affi rm ed
. VACATED in p art ; AFFI RMED i n p art
.

2
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Chris Craddock, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sky
Harvest Windpower Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to
be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(d) disclosed in this quarterly report
any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of
internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 20, 2009

By:

/s/ Chris
CraddockChris Craddock Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10331

Summary Calendar

 

CYRILL ATHANASIOS KOLOCOTRONIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ALAN GREENSPAN, Chairman; FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - -

October 31, 1997

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Cyrill Anthanasios Kolocotronis, who resides at the Missouri

State Mental Hospital, moves to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”)

from the district court’s dismissal of his complaint pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). A review of Kolocotronis’ complaint, in which he

urges this court to disband the Federal Reserve Board, shows that

it contains only “fantastic” and “delusional” allegations.

See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). Because his

appeal of the denial of such a complaint is frivolous, he fails to
present a nonfrivolous issue for appeal, and his IFP motion is

DENIED. See FED. R. APP. P. 24(a); Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 562,

586 (5th Cir. 1982). Kolocotronis’ appeal is DISMISSED as

frivolous. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

We caution Kolocotronis that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Kolocotronis is further cautioned to review all pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

Kolocotronis’ motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED; MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.