alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1220 

KA 08-00549 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL DUGGER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (MARY P. DAVISON OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (SUSAN C.

AZZARELLI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (William D.

Walsh, J.), rendered January 2, 2008. The judgment revoked

defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of

imprisonment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the

sentence of probation previously imposed upon his conviction of

attempted arson in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 150.10 [1])

and imposing a sentence of imprisonment based upon his admission that

he violated the terms and conditions of his probation. Because the

sentence of imprisonment for the violation of probation was imposed

more than 30 days after the original sentence and defendant had not

previously filed a notice of appeal from the original judgment of

conviction, defendant may appeal only from the sentence of

imprisonment (see CPL 450.30 [3]; People v Johnson, 77 AD3d 1441; see

also People v Coble, 17 AD3d 1165, lv denied 5 NY3d 787). Thus, the

contentions of defendant with respect to the original judgment of

conviction, i.e., that County Court erred in delegating the

calculation of restitution to the Probation Department and in denying

him due process by refusing to conduct a restitution hearing, are not

properly before us. The sentence of imprisonment is not unduly harsh

or severe. 

Entered: November 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsCommentaries     Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians
        
            Commentaries
 Keyword
 Type Select a CategoryTop StoriesMission/TrainingFeaturesSecretary of the AFAF Chief of StaffChief Master Sgt. of the AFCommentariesSequestration NewsSpace/TechnologyHumanitarianAFSO 21Women's History Month 1-15EnvironmentalWarrior CareDiversityDignified TransferSafetyHeritageAir Force FamilyPersonnel MattersCommander's Call TopicsHaiti Earthquake ReliefDon't Ask Don't TellSuicide PreventionWarrior GamesEnergyAircraftEtchbergerSexual AssaultOperation TomodachiOperation Odyssey Dawn2011 Appropriations InformationHurricane Irene9/11AFAWeek in PhotosThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their Words2012 Appropriations InformationAfrican American History MonthAfrican American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29Fiscal Year BudgetAir Force StoriesColorado WildfireChief of Staff ArchiveHurricane IsaacAFA 2012APP RSSAPP Airman VisualsExpeditionary OperationsHurricane SandyTransition GPSAir Force in SpaceSports/RecreationH1N1Women's History Month 16-30Oklahoma Tornado ReliefMemorial DayCOVID-19 CommentariesCOVID-19
 RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 March 20, 2018Technology helps overcome deployment challenges
        Military life is not easy. The men and women who serve in our armed forces protect our freedoms and way of life. They make tremendous sacrifices along with their families in service to our country.  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Robert Gelfand, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Wallace Mountain
     Resources Corp.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
31st day of July, 2006.


/s/ Robert Gelfand
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 12(a)



Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of Telecom Italia S.p.A.



I, Franco Bernabè certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 20-F/A of Telecom Italia S.p.A.;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    FRANCO BERNABÈName:

Franco BernabèTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




October 12, 2010
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hector Torres, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Levy, J.), rendered November 18, 1987, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 4 Vi to 9 years and one year imprisonment, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s conviction arises out of his arrest for the street sale of crack cocaine to an undercover police officer. As defendant did not request any sanction with respect to police destruction of their handwritten notes—the content of which was transposed into formal police reports—made contemporaneously with the buy and bust transaction, there is no merit to defendant’s claim that the trial court’s failure to impose any sanctions denied him a fair trial *(see, e.g., People v Albelo,*166 AD2d 313).

Likewise without merit is defendant’s claim of undue prejudice arising out of the testimony of the back-up officers that defendant was apprehended because he fit the description of an individual who had sold crack cocaine to the undercover officer. Initially, it is noted that defense counsel explored the issue extensively in cross-examination to further a mistaken identity defense, and defendant made no effort to preserve the issue for appellate review by appropriate and timely objection *(see, e.g., People v James,*75 NY2d 874). In any event, any bolstering resulting from such testimony is rendered harmless by the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, including his possession of the pre-recorded buy money, and defendant’s admission that the description of the drug seller, as radioed to *285the back-up team by the undercover officer, accurately described him. When considered with the unequivocal in-court identification of defendant by the undercover officer, there is no significant probability that defendant would have been acquitted but for any bolstering resulting from the testimony of the back-up officers *(see, e.g., People v Johnson,*57 NY2d 969).

Finally, we reject defendant’s claim that he was denied a fair trial because the court failed to properly charge the presumption of innocence. We note initially that defendant failed to preserve the issue for appellate review by appropriate exception *(see, e.g., People v Creech,*60 NY2d 895). The jury charge viewed as a whole adequately conveyed the appropriate standards *(People v Thomas,*50 NY2d 467). Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin, Ross and Asch, JJ.
*********************************************
Household Finance Corporation
Household Consumer Loan Corporation
Household Consumer Loan Trust 1995-1
*********************************************
                                                                  
 
Sum of 1/15/97 - 12/15/97
                                                                  
         
Distribution Dates

Ending Pool Principal Balance                              
3,965,949,127.56
Series 1995-1 Participation Invested Amount                  
606,917,728.82
Seller Amount                                                 
59,902,453.90
Remittances on the Participation                             
202,447,927.84
Optimum Monthly Principal                                    
154,330,640.15
Accelerated Principal Payment                                  
1,720,818.26
Ending Class A Note Security Balance                         
352,641,914.84
Ending Class B Note Security Balance                         
172,196,000.00
Ending Certificate Security Balance                           
30,304,000.00
Ending Overcollateralization Amount                           
51,775,813.99
Ending Class A Adjusted Balance                              
352,641,914.84
Ending Class B Adjusted Balance                              
172,196,000.00
Ending Certficate  Adjusted Balance                           
30,304,000.00
Ending Overcollateralization Amount                           
51,775,813.99
Class A Interest Paid                                         
25,700,977.79
Class B Interest Paid                                         
10,856,140.87
Certificate Yield Paid                                         
2,034,618.31
Class A Unpaid Interest                                           
     0.00
Class B Unpaid Interest                                           
     0.00
Cetificate Unpaid Yield                                           
     0.00
Class A Principal Paid                                       
156,051,458.40
Class B Principal Paid                                            
     0.00
Certificate  Principal Paid                                       
     0.00
OC Principal Paid                                                 
     0.00
Total Charge-Offs:                                                
     0.00
Interest paid per $1,000 Class A                                  
    34.27
Principal paid per $1,000 Class A                                 
   208.07
Interest paid per $1,000 Class B                                  
    63.05
Interest paid per $1,000 Class B                                  
     0.00
Yield Paid per $1000 Certificate                                  
    67.14
Principal Paid per $1000 Certificate                              
     0.00
# C_2006241EN.01000201.xml

| 6.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 18 September 2006

appointing a member of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency

(2006/C 241/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second and third paragraphs of Article 54 thereof,

Having regard to Article X of the Statutes of the Euratom Supply Agency (1), as last amended by Decision 95/1/EC, Euratom, ECSC of 1 January 1995 (2),

1

2

Having regard to the Council Decision of 12 July 2005 appointing the members of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency (3),

3

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | A member's seat on the above Committee has fallen vacant following the resignation of Mr Ákos PETŐ, of which the Council was informed on 15 February 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

A member's seat on the above Committee has fallen vacant following the resignation of Mr Ákos PETŐ, of which the Council was informed on 15 February 2006.

| (2) | That vacancy should therefore be filled. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

That vacancy should therefore be filled.

| (3) | The Hungarian Government submitted a nomination on 15 February 2006, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Hungarian Government submitted a nomination on 15 February 2006,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Mr Kristóf HORVÁTH is hereby appointed a member of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency for the remainder of the Committee's term of office, which ends on 28 March 2007.

Done at Brussels, 18 September 2006

For the Council

The President

J. KORKEAOJA

---

(1)  OJ 27, 6.12.1958, p. 534/58.

1

(2)  OJ L 1, 1.1.1995, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ C 178, 20.7.2005, p. 1.

3

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

AND

 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF

RAVEN GOLD CORP.

I, Mike Wood, President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of Raven Gold Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 (the “Report”):

|   | a. | complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at July 31, 2008, and the results of the Company’s operations for the quarter ended July 31, 2008. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                      |   |   |   |                                     |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|
| Date:  September 22, 2008 |   |   |   | /s/ Mike Wood                            |
|                      |   |   |   |                                     |
|                      |   |   |   | Mike Wood                                |
|                      |   |   |   | *President, Chief Executive Officer and* |
|                      |   |   |   | *Acting Chief Financial Officer*         |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of China North East Petroleum Holdings Limited (“NEP”), a Nevada corporation with principal executive offices in New York and oil drilling operations in the People's Republic of China. NEP's common stock is registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and is traded on NYSE Amex.

Questions have arisen regarding the accuracy and completeness of information contained in NEP's public filings with the Commission concerning, among other things, certain transfers of cash from the company's bank accounts to the personal bank accounts of related parties.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of NEP.

                    Therefore,                     *it is ordered,*                     pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Exchange Act, that trading in the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST, March 1, 2012, through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on March 14, 2012.                

By the Commission.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-5373 Filed 3-1-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P