alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Site visit review of the Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) by the Division of Materials Research (DMR) #1203.                    

*Dates and Times:*                         Feb 16, 2012; 7:15 a.m.-6:45 p.m., Feb 17, 2012; 8 a.m.-4:30 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Part open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Charles Ying, Program Director, Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-8428.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning further support of the MRSEC at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.                    

*Agenda:*

## Thursday, February 16, 2012

7:15 a.m.-8:15 a.m. Closed—Executive Session

8:15 a.m.-5 p.m. Open—Review of the MIT MRSEC

5 p.m.-6:45 p.m. Closed—Executive Session

Friday, February 17, 2012

8 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed—Executive session

9 a.m.-10 a.m. Open—Review of the MIT MRSEC

10 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Closed—Executive Session, Report Writing

*Reason for Closing:*                         The work being reviewed may include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the MRSEC. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552 b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: January 10, 2012.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-561 Filed 1-12-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit
10.2
 ALLONGE TO GUARANTEED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE (L)
 THIS ALLONGE TO GUARANTEED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE (L) th
    1.
    
    The Company and the Holder each agree that the Maturity Date shall be December 31,
2011 and that Schedule A to the Note remains unchanged.
 2.
    
    Except as amended or revised by this Allonge, the terms of the Note remain in full
force and effect as of the date hereof. In the event the terms of the Note should conflict
with this Allonge, the terms of this Allonge shall control.
 3.
    
    The Company hereby certifies, represents and warrants to the Holder that all
certifications, representations and warranties made by the Company to the Holder in or in
connection with this Allonge were true in all material respects as of the date of this
Allonge and are true in all material respects on and as of the date hereof as if made on
and as of the date hereof.
 4.
    
    The obligations evidenced hereby are subordinate in the manner and to the extent set
forth in that certain Subordination Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2008 (the
Subordination Agreement) among, without limitation, the Holder, ISI Security Group, Inc.,
the Companys parent (the Parent), and the PrivateBank and Trust Company, to the
obligations (including interest) owed by the Parent to the holders of all of the notes
issued pursuant to that certain Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2008,
as has been amended (the Loan and Security Agreement), as such Agreement may hereafter be
supplemented, modified, restated or amended from time to time; and each holder hereof, by
its acceptance hereof, shall be bound by the provisions of the Subordination Agreement.
 5.
    
    This Allonge shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of California.6.
    
    A facsimile copy of this Allonge shall be deemed an original for all purposes.




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 ISI DETENTION CONTRACTING GROUP, INC.,
a California corporationBy:
    /s/ Donald F. NevilleName:
    Donald F. NevilleTitle:
    CFO ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO AS OF 
THE DATE FIRST WRITTEN ABOVE:
PETERSON DETENTION, INC.By:
    /s/ Michael PetersonName:
    Michael PetersonTitle:
    V.P.




---



#####
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S)1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Gilberto M. Duarte, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of World Airways, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
          December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
          Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
          (15 U.S.C. (S)78m); and

     2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
          has been provided to World Airways, Inc and furnished to the
          Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

          Date:    3/27/2003

                                  /s/ Gilberto M. Duarte, Jr.
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Gilberto M. Duarte, Jr.
                                  Chief Financial Officer of World Airways, Inc.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AgFeed Industries, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Xiong
Junhong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:  May
      15, 2008
            By: /s/ Xiong JunhongXiong
      JunhongChief
      Executive Officer





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Zachary M. Graves, Chief Financial Officer of Bronco Drilling Company, Inc., (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 2, 2006 |  | /s/ Zachary M. Graves  
|                        |  | Zac Graves             
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2006023EN.01006701.xml

| 27.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 23/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 23/67

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 149/2006

of 26 January 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 20 to 26 January 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 January 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0660. GARTH COOPER v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following

an adverse ruling, defendant Garth Cooper appealed to the state court, which

dismissed the appeal as untimely. Cooper then filed a notice of appeal directed to the

superior court, where he subsequently filed an OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) motion to set

aside the state court’s dismissal order. On June 6, 2019, the superior court dismissed

Cooper’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Nevertheless, on August 24, 2020, the

superior court denied Cooper’s motion to set aside. On September 3, 2020, Cooper

filed a direct appeal to this Court. We lack jurisdiction for multiple reasons.1

First, an appeal froma trial court order denying an OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) motion

to set aside must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8), (b); Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116,

116 (640 SE2d 688) (2006). Second, an appeal from a superior court decision

reviewing a lower court decision by certiorari or de novo proceedings likewise must

be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review, as must an appeal from

a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal froma magistrate court decision. See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), (11), (b); Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d

333) (2003); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d

1 Given our ruling that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, we express no

opinion on the propriety of the superior court’s denial of Cooper’s motion to set aside

after it dismissed his appeal.

June 28, 2021
119) (1995). Cooper’s failure to follow the proper procedure deprives us of

jurisdiction over this direct appeal.

Third, while a notice of appeal generally may be filed within thirty days of

entry of the order sought to be appealed, appeals in dispossessory actions must be

filed within seven days of the date the judgment was entered. See OCGA § 44-7-56;

Radio Sandy Springs, Inc. v. Allen Road Joint Venture, 311 Ga. App. 334, 335-336

(715 SE2d 752) (2011). Cooper untimely filed his notice of appeal ten days after

entry of the denial of his motion to set aside, thereby independently depriving us of

jurisdiction over this appeal.

For each of the above reasons, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/28/2021
EXHIBIT 10.3

FIRST AMENDMENT TO  PACIFIC NORTHWEST BANK EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

(KIM S. BRACE)

This First Amendment to Employment Agreement ("Amendment") is made on the 20th day of March, 2000, between INTERWEST BANCORP, INC. and PACIFIC NORTHWEST BANK
(hereinafter jointly referred to as "Bank") and KIM S. BRACE ("Employee"), who agree as follows:

RECITALS

This Amendment is made with reference to the following facts and objectives:

A.  Pacific
Northwest Bank, in conjunction with a Plan and Merger Agreement of Reorganization whereby Pacific Northwest Bank was acquired by InterWest
Bancorp, Inc., entered into an Employment Agreement with Employee ("Agreement").

B.  Bank
and Employee now wish to amend the Agreement to make it advantageous for Employee to continue her employment after June 16, 2000, the first date upon
which Employee has the right to terminate employment with Bank and receive a one-time cash payment as provided under the "Employment Termination Window" provision of the Agreement.

C.  To
achieve the goal set forth in B, above, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as set forth hereafter.

AMENDMENT

1.  Subparagraph
2(b) of the Agreement,Term, is deleted in its entirety and the following shall be inserted in
its place:



2.  Paragraph
4,Salary, is deleted in its entirety and the following shall be inserted in its place:



3.  Paragraph
5,Incentive Compensation, is modified to add the following paragraphs:



1

---



4.  Subparagraph
8 (c) of the Agreement,Termination, is amended to add the following at the end of the
paragraph:



5.  Subparagraph 8(d) of
the Agreement,Employee Termination Window, is deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:



6   Paragraph
12,Noncompetition, is deleted in its entirety and all references in the Agreement to Section 12 shall be
deleted.

7   Except
as set forth in this Amendment, all the provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

| |  | INTERWEST BANCORP, INC.    
| |  | ---------------------------
| |  | By:                        
| |  | PACIFIC NORTHWEST BANK     
| |  | By:                        
| |  | /s/KIM S. BRACEKim S. Brace

2

---



PACIFIC NORTHWEST BANK  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), signed January 15, 1998, between PACIFIC NORTHWEST BANK ("Bank") and KIM S. BRACE ("Employee") takes
effect on the effective date of the Reorganization ("Effective Date").

RECITALS

AGREEMENT

The parties agree as follows:



1

---

2

---





3

---





4

---





5

---



[Signatures on Next Page]

6

---

Signed January 15, 1998:

| |  | PACIFIC NORTHWEST BANK
| |  | ----------------------
| |  |                       
| |  |                       
| |  |                       

7

---

QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7847

GERALD A. THOMAS, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PRINCE WILLIAM-MANASSAS ADULT DETENTION CENTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-95-760-AM)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 29, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald A. Thomas, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Thomas v. Prince William-Manassas Detention Ctr., No. CA-95-760-AM

(E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
October 24, 2013 

Kevin D. Schlemmer, Chief 

Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington; DC 20590 

RE: Order 2013-10-3 

Servicing Kalaupapa, Hawaii 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer; 

On behalf of the Kalaupapa Lions Club and its members, I would like to express our 100% satisfaction 

with the service we have been receiving from Makani Kai Air this past year. They are one of only a 

handful of companies that I have dealt with that actually listen to our concerns and try their best to 

accommodate. Many times they have gone above and beyond normal business protocol to address our 

special circumstances here in Kalaupapa. They even purchased a lift for the Kalaupapa airport to assist 

the patients/passengers with embarking and departing their planes. 

They have met with this community several times to solicit our input on the scheduling of flights and 

luggage restrictions. We, of course, are thrilled with the lower and fairer prices on the flights. 

We also are pleased with the professional and courtesy staff at Makani Kai Air from the reservationist to 

the pilots and everyone in between. We all have been embraced by them, employees and owners, and 

fell like they in return are a part of our 'ohana. 

We wholeheartedly support reissuing of the Essential Air Service contract to Makani Kai Air for servicing 

Kalauapapa. 

Sincerely, 

Cla·rence "Boogie" Kahilihiwa 

President 

Kalaupapa Lions Club
#### Maria J. Baldwin, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondent, v Cesar Perales, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, Defendant, and Barbara J. Sobol, as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services, et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene Nardelli, J.), entered on April 20, 1990, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Eugene Nardelli, J., without costs. No opinion. Concur—Carro, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Kupferman, JJ.
### Official	Meeting	of	the

**National	and	Governmental	Advisory	Committees	to	the U.S.	Representative	to	the	Commission	for**  **Environmental	Cooperation TELECONFERENCE AGEND** **A Tues**  **day, December 17th**  **, 2013 12:30**  **p.m. -**  **4 :30**  **p.m. (Eastern Standard Time) 1201 Constitution Ave. NW**  **EPA East WJC**  **Building, Room 1132 Washington, DC 20460** 

12:30 p m **Call to Order and Introductions**

Oscar Carrillo, Designated Federal Officer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 12:3 5 p m **Opening Remarks** 

Cynthia Jones

-Jackson, Associate Director O ffice of Diversity, Advisory Committee Management and Outreach (ODACMO) Denise Sirmons, Director, ODACMO 12:40 p m **Welcome and O verview of Agenda** 

Octaviana Trujillo, Chair of the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) Brian Houseal, Chair of the National Advisory Committee (NAC) 12 : 50 p m **Update on U.S. Priorities &**  **Guidance :**  **20 th**  **Anniversary**

Jane Nishida , Acting Assistant Administrator, International & Tribal Affairs ( OI TA ) , EPA JoAnn Chase, Director American Indian Environmental Office (OITA) 1 : 10 p m Question & Answer Period 1:2 5 pm **CEC Operational Plan Overview**  **& NAPECA Grants**  **Update**

Irasema Coronado , Executive Director, CEC Secretariat 1 : 35 pm Question & Answer Period 1:4 5 pm **JPAC Report**  **- out** 

Dave Angus , Chair, Joint Public Advisory Committee 1:55 pm Question & Answer Period 2:10 pm **Public Comments Period** **Continued...**

2:25 pm **Discussion on the NAAEC’s 20 th**  **Anniversary**

Octaviana Trujillo, Chair of the Governmental Advisory Committee Brian Houseal, Chair of the National Advisory Committee 3:45 pm **Next Steps** 4:30 pm **ADJOURN**