alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-561]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:
    Name: Site visit review of the Materials Research Science and 
Engineering Center (MRSEC) at Massachusetts Institute of Technology 
(MIT) by the Division of Materials Research (DMR) <greek-i>1203.
    Dates and Times: Feb 16, 2012; 7:15 a.m.-6:45 p.m., Feb 17, 
2012; 8 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
    Place: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 
Massachusetts 02139.
    Type of Meeting: Part open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Charles Ying, Program Director, Materials 
Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of 
Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-8428.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the MRSEC at Massachusetts Institute 
of Technology.
    Agenda:

Thursday, February 16, 2012

7:15 a.m.-8:15 a.m. Closed--Executive Session
8:15 a.m.-5 p.m. Open--Review of the MIT MRSEC
5 p.m.-6:45 p.m. Closed--Executive Session
    Friday, February 17, 2012
8 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed--Executive session
9 a.m.-10 a.m. Open--Review of the MIT MRSEC
10 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Closed--Executive Session, Report Writing
    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the MRSEC. These 
matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552 b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 10, 2012.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-561 Filed 1-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.45


[LETTERHEAD] WESTPOINT STEVENS




HOLCOMBE T. GREEN, JR.
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  May 28, 1996



Personal and Confidential

Mr. Joseph L. Jennings
WestPoint Stevens Inc.
P.O. Box 71
West Point, GA 31833

Dear Joe:

         You have indicated that you would like to avoid the daily 
responsibilities associated with your present position as President and Chief
Operating Officer of WestPoint Stevens Inc., and in response thereto, I have
proposed the following arrangement with respect to your employment by the 
Company in 1997-98:

         1.  Effective January 1, 1997, you would serve as Vice-Chairman of the
company, reporting directly to me.  As such, you would have no daily 
responsibilities but would be available, as your time allowed, to assist me from
time to time with certain special projects.  For example, I would like for you
to assist me with the supervision of Alamac, our cotton purchases, and the India
joint venture.

         You would also continue to serve as WestPoint's member of the ATMI
Board of Directors and would represent the Company in various community Boards
and functions in the West Point, Georgia area.

         You would continue, as your time permitted, to assist the Company with
its sales and customer relations, especially with the larger accounts where you
have personal contacts.
<PAGE>   2
                                     - 2 -


         2.  You would maintain your present office and secretary and be 
eligible for all your current benefits.  If you moved from West Point, Georgia,
you would be furnished with an office and secretarial assistance at a Company
location of your choice.

         3.  You would be paid $120,000 annually as your base salary and would
be eligible to participate in the incentive bonus program and stock bonus
program.  You would keep all of your current stock options, subject to their
normal terms.

         4.  If you decide to sell your home in West Point, Georgia, you would
sell the house to the Company for your cost, including all improvements paid by
you, plus $50,000.

         You would, of course, remain a member of the Board of Directors of
WestPoint Stevens Inc.

         Please let me know if this arrangement is satisfactory with you. This
agreement supersedes your current employment agreement with the Company
effective as of January 1, 1997.

                                        Sincerely,

                                        /s/ Holcombe T. Green, Jr.

                                        Holcombe T. Green, Jr.

HTGjr:rj
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5045]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-539-C (Third Review)]


Uranium From Russia

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that termination of the suspended investigation on 
uranium from Russia would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun did not participate in this 
review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on July 1, 2011 (76 FR 38694) 
and determined on October 4, 2011 that it would conduct an expedited 
review (76 FR 64107, October 17, 2011).
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the 
Secretary of Commerce on February 27, 2012. The views of the Commission 
are contained in USITC Publication 4307 (February 2012), entitled 
Uranium from Russia: Investigation No. 731-TA-539-C (Third Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: February 27, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-5045 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350,


Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Smart Balance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Form
10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May 6, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      Stephen B. HughesStephen
      B. HughesChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      executive officer)
1

CAUSE NO. 01-14-00934-CR

LINDA HENDERSON-QUALLS, § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

APPELLANT §

 § 

VS. § 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

 §

THE STATE OF TEXAS, § 

APPELLEE § AT HOUSTON, TEXAS 

CASE NO. 1370183 

THE STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF 

 §

VS. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 

 §

LINDA HENDERSON-QUALLS § 182ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: 

 COMES NOW LINDA HENDERSON-QUALLS, appellant, by and through her attorney 

of record, KURT B. WENTZ, who files this Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Appellant’s Brief and in support thereof would show this Court as follows: 

I.

 The appellant was found guilty of aggravated theft from a nonprofit organization 

($100,000 - $200,000) and sentenced to 10 years confinement in the Institutional Division of the 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 

II.

The appellant’s brief was originally due on March 13, 2015. 

III. 

 The attorney for the appellant was unable to timely file the appellant's brief because of 

ACCEPTED

01-14-00934-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

5/12/2015 1:29:25 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/12/2015 1:29:25 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2

the demands of trial cases and other appellate matters. The appellant's brief has now been 

completed and filed contemporaneously with this Motion for Extension of Time.

IV.

This Motion is not intended for the purposes of delay but only to ensure the filing of the 

appellant's brief which has now been completed and filed with this Court.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the appellant requests that the Court grant 

this motion in all things to allow for the filing of her brief.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Kurt B. Wentz____________________________

KURT B. WENTZ

5629 Cypress Creek Parkway, Suite 115

Houston, Texas 77069

Phone: 281/587-0088

e-mail: kbsawentz@yahoo.com

State Bar No. 21179300

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Kurt B. Wentz, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this Motion was submitted 

to the Assistant District Attorney for Harris County, Texas on the 12th day of May, 2015.

/s/Kurt B. Wentz___________________________

KURT B. WENTZ
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1949 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1949

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pyromellitic Dianhydride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

  Mr. Isakson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pyromellitic Dianhydride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PYROMELLITIC DIANHYDRIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.14 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Pyromellitic Dianhydride) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative.

# ACTION:

Notice of a Partially Opened Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Industry Trade Advisory Committee on Small and Minority Business (ITAC-11) will hold a meeting on Wednesday, April 4, 2012, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. The meeting will be opened to the public from 9 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.

# DATES:

The meeting is scheduled for April 4, 2012, unless otherwise notified.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Herbert C. Humphrey Building, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Room 1412, Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Laura Hellstern, DFO for ITAC-11 at (202) 482-3222, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Agenda topics to be discussed are:

U.S. Small Business Administration State Trade and Export Promotion (STEP) Grants Process.

Christine L. Turner,

Assistant U.S. Trade Representative, Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement.

[FR Doc. 2012-5791 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3190-W2-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1873 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1873

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,3-Dichloronitrobenzene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,3-Dichloronitrobenzene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,3-DICHLORONITROBENZENE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.20 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2,3-Dichloronitrobenzene) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2012''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                        SUBSIDIARIES OF TRANSPRO, INC.


The following sets forth a list of all the direct and indirect subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2002 of Transpro, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
and the State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of each.




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                NAME                    JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
------------------------------------   ----------------------------------------------
<S>                                    <C>
   G&O Manufacturing Company, Inc.                        Delaware
   GO/DAN Industries, Inc.                                Delaware
   GO/DAN de Mexico, SA de C.V.                            Mexico
   Radiadores GDI, SA de C.V.(a)                           Mexico
   Ready Aire, Inc.                                         Texas
</TABLE>

----------
(a) Currently an inactive subsidiary.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerry Sanders, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey Atlas, J., at hearing; Clifford Scott, J., at *392trial and sentence), rendered June 15, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree and attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent, indeterminate prison terms of 25 years to life for the murder count and 5 to 15 years for the attempted robbery count, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932), and giving due deference to the jury’s findings of credibility *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490), we find that the defendant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt by overwhelming evidence.

The trial court properly received into evidence a copy of the lineup form to clarify confusing testimony as to whether the lineup witness had selected the third person from the left or the third person from the right. Under the circumstances, the lineup form gave the jury an effective tool for assessing the weight and credibility of the identification testimony *(People v Viruet,*171 AD2d 490). This document does not constitute improper bolstering of the identification testimony, since it does not amount to another witness testifying to the fact of a complainant’s out-of-court identification of the defendant *(compare, People v Bonnet,*134 AD2d 436, *lv denied*70 NY2d 953).

The defendant’s arguments with respect to the trial court’s charge on intent and note-taking by the jury are unpreserved for appellate review, since the defendant failed to raise any objection at trial (CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to consider them in the interest of justice.

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining arguments, including those raised in the defendant’s *pro se*supplemental brief, and find them to be without merit as well. Concur— Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-15689, No. 333-42534, No. 333-65924, and No. 333-129698 for the Century Aluminum Company 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, Registration Statement No. 333-15671 for the Century Aluminum Company Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, Registration Statement No. 333-129699 for the Century Aluminum 401(k) Plan, Registration Statement No. 333-07239 for the Century Aluminum Company of West Virginia, Inc. Salaried Employee Defined Contribution Retirement Plan, Registration Statements No. 333-129697 and No. 333-28827 for the Century Aluminum Company of West Virginia, Inc. United Steelworkers of America Savings Plan (all on Forms S-8) and Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 333-143315 (on Form S-3) of our reports dated March 16, 2010, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Century Aluminum Company and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of Century Aluminum Company and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, all appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Century Aluminum Company for the year ended December 31, 2009.








/s/ Deloitte and Touche LLP





Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania


March 16, 2010
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *581Jose Vasquez, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.), rendered October 22, 1986, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to suppress physical evidence is granted, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.

The hearing record demonstrates that the defendant was a passenger in a car which was double-parked when Police Officers John Picerno and Michael Oliver pulled up behind it in an unmarked patrol car. The officers exited their vehicle and approached the double-parked car, Officer Oliver on the driver’s side and Officer Picerno on the passenger’s side. Officer Picerno testified at the suppression hearing that he and Officer Oliver were not interested in issuing a summons for any Vehicle and Traffic Law violation *(see,*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1202), but instead were interested in investigating what they considered to be a suspicious vehicle. Officer Oliver then ”[a]sked the two occupants to step out and produce identification and documents for the vehicle”. As the defendant opened the door and exited the car, Officer Picerno observed a clear plastic bag containing a white substance believed to be cocaine on the floor of the passenger’s seat. Officer Picerno then conducted a further search and recovered a semi-automatic pistol under the driver’s side floor mat.

Under these circumstances, we find that the hearing court erred in denying suppression of the cocaine and gun recovered from the car. The hearing testimony clearly established that the alleged Vehicle and Traffic Law violation was employed by the officers as a mere pretext to approach and order the occupants out of the car *(see, e.g., People v Vails,*170 AD2d 550; *People v Mikel,*152 AD2d 603, 604-605; *People v Rossetti,*148 AD2d 357; *People v Mezon,*140 AD2d 634, 635; *People v Llopis,*125 AD2d 416, 417). Accordingly, inasmuch as the act of detaining the defendant by ordering him out of the vehicle was not based on probable cause, reasonable suspicion or any *582indicia that criminal activity was afoot, the evidence observed thereby is suppressed and the indictment is dismissed.

In light of the foregoing, we need not address the defendant’s remaining contentions. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-10-000019227-SEP-201108:15 AM
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AgFeed Industries, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Liangfan
      Yan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
                November 13, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Liangfan YanLiangfan
                YanChief
                Financial Officer





This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.