alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TRANSPRO,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             222
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,128
<INVENTORY>                                     85,346
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,323
<PP&E>                                         103,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,749
<BONDS>                                         61,928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,895
<SALES>                                        261,577
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               261,577
<CGS>                                          197,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  197,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,566
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   268
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,444
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,920
<INCOME-TAX>                                       104
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,816
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,816
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.96


</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1961 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain alginates. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Ms. COLLINS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain alginates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ALGINATES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Alginic acid (CAS No. 9005– 

32–7), ammonium alignate 

(CAS No. 9005–34–9), potassium alginate (CAS No. 

9005–36–1), calcium alginate 

(CAS No. 9005–35–0), and 

magnesium alginate (CAS 

No. 37251–44–8) (provided 

for in subheading 

3913.10.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1961 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Ernest R. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of Cutter & Buck Inc., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cutter & Buck Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Dated: July 14, 2004 |  |                                                                                                           
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/ERNEST R. JOHNSONErnest R. Johnson Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

59

---



QuickLinks
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Frank, McClanahan and Senior Judge Willis 

DENNIS E. BELLAMY 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0843-06-4 PER CURIAM 

 OCTOBER 10, 2006 

FOOD LION LLC #1226 AND 

 DELHAIZE AMERICA, INC. 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Dennis E. Bellamy, pro se, on brief). 

 (William B. Pierce, Jr.; David G. Browne; William B. Pierce & 

Associates, PLLC, on brief), for appellees. 

 Dennis E. Bellamy appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission 

finding that he failed to prove he sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course 

of his employment on September 10, 2004. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s 

opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the commission in its final opinion. See Bellamy v. Food Lion LLC #1226, VWC File 

No. 220-92-38 (Feb. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed.

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
#### John SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. M-86-402.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Jan. 5, 1988.

*536John Simmons, pro se.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., Jean M. Leblanc, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

The appellant, John Simmons, was convicted in the District Court of Beckham County of the crimes of Transporting a Loaded Firearm (Count I), Carrying a Concealed Weapon (Count II), Operating a Motor Vehicle Without a Valid Operator’s License (Count IV), and Failure to Display Current Tag (Count V) in Case No. CRM-86-16 and was sentenced to three (3) months imprisonment and a three hundred dollar ($300.00) fine for Count I, six (6) months imprisonment and a five hundred dollar ($500.00) fine for Count II, a one hundred dollar ($100.00) fine for Count IV, and a one hundred dollar ($100.00) fine for Count V, the sentences to run consecutively. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty on Count III, Failure to Carry Surety Verification Form.

Appellant raises several assignments of error on appeal; however, we observe that appellant does not deny the charges against him and offers no legitimate defense. He simply raises patently frivolous issues which are not supported by relevant argument or authority. Therefore, we will not consider these alleged contentions. *Kimberlin v. State,*736 P.2d 530, 531 (Okl.Cr.1987); *Sisson v. State,*714 P.2d 1043 (Okl.Cr.1986).

The judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.

BRETT, P.J., concurs.

PARKS, J., concurs in results.
#### Peter Cangemi et al., Plaintiffs, v City of New York, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. North River Associates, Third-Party Defendant and Second Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant; Argrett Enterprises Corp., Second Third-Party Defendant-Respondent and Third Third-Party Plaintiff, et al., Third Third-Party Defendant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Stecher, J.), entered on June 8, 1990, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Martin Stecher, J., with costs. No opinion. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ross, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED, PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 Form 10-K Issuer
  (i)
    
    the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer as of the
dates and for the periods indicated in the Form 10-K.
 /s/ Larry L. Enterline
    
    
    
    /s/ Amy BobbittLarry L. Enterline
    
    
    
    Amy BobbittChief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting OfficerMarch 12, 2008
    
    
    
    March 12, 2008
# L_2006019EN.01001001.xml

| 24.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 19/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 19/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 114/2006

of 23 January 2006

amending the rates of refunds applicable to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular Article 27(5)(a) and (15) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The rates of the refunds applicable from 20 January 2006 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The rates of the refunds applicable from 20 January 2006 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 (2).

| (2) | It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained in Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present applicable should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained in Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present applicable should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of refund fixed by Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 are hereby altered as shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 24 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 January 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 15, 20.1.2006, p. 32.

2

---

ANNEX

Rates of refunds applicable from 24 January 2006 to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (1)

| CN code | Description | Rate of refund in EUR/100 kg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| In case of advance fixing of refunds | Other |
| 1701 99 10 | White sugar | 28,61 | 28,61 |

CN code

Description

Rate of refund in EUR/100 kg

In case of advance fixing of refunds

Other

1701 99 10

White sugar

28,61

28,61

---

(1)  The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004, to Romania with effect from 1 December 2005, and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein with effect from 1 February 2005.

---
# L_2007031EN.01001001.xml

| 6.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 31/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 31/10

---

Corrigendum to Decision No 1718/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 concerning the implementation of a programme of support for the European audiovisual sector (MEDIA 2007)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 327 of 24 November 2006
  )

On page 17, Article 11 shall read as follows (correction of numbering):

‘Article 11

Committee procedure

1.   The Commission shall be assisted by a committee.

2.   Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 4 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply.

The period laid down in Article 4(3) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at two months.

3.   Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 3 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.

4.   The committee shall adopt its rules of procedure.’

---
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 19-11074

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:97-cr-00099-WS-B-10

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

MICHAEL JEROME FILES, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

(May 21, 2021)

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

USCA11 Case: 19-11074 Date Filed: 05/21/2021 Page: 1 of 2
2

In the district court, Michael Jerome Files requested a sentence reduction 

under § 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 

5222. The district court denied the motion, concluding that he was ineligible for a 

sentence reduction. Files has appealed.

When the district court denied Files’s motion, it did not have the benefit of 

our decision in United States v. Jones, 962 F.3d 1290 (11th Cir. 2020). We do, and 

now that we do, the government has conceded that Files is eligible for a sentence 

reduction under § 404 of the First Step Act. Having reviewed Jones and the record 

in this case, we accept the government’s concession, vacate the district court’s 

orders denying a sentence reduction, and remand for further proceedings so that the 

district court may decide whether to exercise its discretion under § 404 to award 

Files a sentence reduction. See id. at 1304.

VACATED and REMANDED.

USCA11 Case: 19-11074 Date Filed: 05/21/2021 Page: 2 of 2
# L_2006122EN.01000701.xml

| 9.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 122/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 122/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 703/2006

of 8 May 2006

amending Regulation (EC) No 1845/2005 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of maize held by the Czech intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1845/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of 31 185 tonnes of maize held by the Czech intervention agency. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1845/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of 31 185 tonnes of maize held by the Czech intervention agency.

| (2) | Given the current market situation, the quantities of maize put up for sale by the Czech intervention agency on the internal market should be increased, taking the permanent invitation to tender to 131 185 tonnes. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Given the current market situation, the quantities of maize put up for sale by the Czech intervention agency on the internal market should be increased, taking the permanent invitation to tender to 131 185 tonnes.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 1845/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 1845/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 1845/2005 is hereby amended as follows:

In Article 1, ‘
  31 185 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘
  131 185 tonnes’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 May 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 296, 12.11.2005, p. 3.

2

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135967 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135967 COA: 272988 Wayne CC: 06-001737-01 JONATHON ARTURO CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 15, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0519 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2008

Clerk
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         Each director and/or officer of CheckFree Corporation (the
"Corporation") whose signature appears below hereby appoints Peter J. Kight,
Peter F. Sinisgalli, and Curtis A. Loveland as the undersigned's attorneys or
any of them individually as the undersigned's attorney, to sign, in the
undersigned's name and behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to
cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K")
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001, and likewise to sign and file with the
Commission any and all amendments to the Form 10-K, and the Corporation hereby
also appoints such persons as its attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its
attorney-in-fact with like authority to sign and file the Form 10-K and any
amendments thereto granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power of
substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such
attorney-in-fact or the undersigned's substitute may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 9th day of
August, 2001.

Signature                                                     Title


     /s/ Peter J. Kight                     Chairman of the Board of Directors
----------------------------------          and Chief Executive Officer
     Peter J. Kight                         (Principal Executive Officer)


     /s/ David E. Mangum                    Executive Vice President and Chief
----------------------------------          Financial Officer
     David E. Mangum                        (Principal Financial Officer)



     /s/ Gary A. Luoma, Jr.                 Senior Vice President - Finance and
----------------------------------          Accounting, Chief Accounting Officer
     Gary A. Luoma, Jr.                     and Assistant Secretary
                                            (Principal Accounting Officer)



     /s/ William P. Boardman                Director
----------------------------------
     William P. Boardman


     /s/ James D. Dixon                     Director
----------------------------------
     James D. Dixon


     /s/ Henry C. Duques                    Director
----------------------------------
     Henry C. Duques


     /s/ Mark A. Johnson                    Director
----------------------------------
     Mark A. Johnson


     /s/ Lewis C. Levin                     Director
----------------------------------
     Lewis C. Levin


     /s/ Eugene F. Quinn                    Director
----------------------------------
     Eugene F. Quinn


     /s/ Jeffrey M. Wilkins                 Director
----------------------------------
     Jeffrey M. Wilkins
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1980 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1980

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain fiberglass sheets used to 
                        make flooring substrate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain fiberglass sheets used to 
                        make flooring substrate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FIBERGLASS SHEETS USED TO MAKE FLOORING SUBSTRATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Thin smooth         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        nonwoven                                                           31/2011.......
                        fiberglass
                        sheets,
                        approximately 0.3
                        mm to 0.8 mm
                        thick, comprised
                        principally of a
                        blend of 8 micron
                        to 10 micron
                        glass fibers
                        bound in a urea
                        formaldehyde
                        matrix modified
                        with vinyl
                        acetate and
                        acrylic latex of
                        a kind primarily
                        used as vinyl
                        flooring
                        substrate
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        7019.32.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```