alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006059EN.01000701.xml

| 1.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 59/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 59/7

---

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 352/2006

of 27 February 2006

repealing Regulation (EEC) No 1461/93 concerning access to public contracts for tenderers from the United States of America

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Regulation (EEC) No 1461/93 (1), restricts access for United States tenderers in respect of certain contracts awarded by certain public authorities in response to certain measures taken by the United States under Title VII of its 1988 Trade Act in respect of Community tenderers. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Regulation (EEC) No 1461/93 (1), restricts access for United States tenderers in respect of certain contracts awarded by certain public authorities in response to certain measures taken by the United States under Title VII of its 1988 Trade Act in respect of Community tenderers.

| (2) | The decision of the United States of America to repeal the sanctions imposed under Title VII of its 1988 Trade Act will take effect as of 1 March 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The decision of the United States of America to repeal the sanctions imposed under Title VII of its 1988 Trade Act will take effect as of 1 March 2006.

| (3) | Regulation (EEC) No 1461/93 should therefore be repealed, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EEC) No 1461/93 should therefore be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Council Regulation (EEC) No 1461/93 concerning access to public contracts for tenderers from the United States of America is hereby repealed.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 February 2006.

For the Council

The President

U. PLASSNIK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 146, 17.6.1993, p. 1.

1

---
#### In the Matter of Janel E. and Another, Children Alleged to be Abused. Commissioner of Social Services, Respondent, v Samuel E., Appellant.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory D. Fields, J.), entered July 6, 1990, which disqualified and removed respondent’s attorneys, unanimously modified on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion to disqualify the specific counsel assigned to him by his plan, but not the remaining attorneys of the Legal Services Plan and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

In this child abuse proceeding, respondent-father was represented by his union’s prepaid Legal Services Plan-Local 237. During a hearing, petitioner’s witness, the children’s mother, testified that she had been coerced by respondent’s attorney to sign a statement exonerating respondent. The court then immediately *sua sponte,*disqualified the attorney and the Legal Services Plan pursuant to Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-102.

*414DR 5-102 generally requires withdrawal of counsel when it appears that counsel ought to testify on a client’s behalf regarding a disputed factual issue, or when it appears that counsel will be called as a witness for an adverse party and that testimony may be prejudicial to the client *(People v Paperno,*54 NY2d 294). Whether counsel ought to testify does not depend solely on the fact that counsel has knowledge or was involved in the transaction, but whether the testimony is necessary *(S & S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v*777 *S. H. Corp.,*69 NY2d 437, 444). While it appears that counsel’s testimony may be necessary to refute the allegations of coercion, there is no good reason why under DR 5-102 (A) the entire firm should be required to withdraw where, as here, a lawyer from the firm may appear as a witness. As disqualification of the entire prepaid legal services firm could leave respondent unable to afford other counsel, we modify accordingly. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-60389

Summary Calendar

 

GHEORGHE DUMBRAVEANU,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals

USDC No. A70 569 803

- - - - - - - - - -

March 20, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:*

Gheorghe Dumbraveanu petitions this court to review the

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his

applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. Mr.

Dumbraveanu argues that he was denied due process because a Board

of Immigration Appeals transmittal letter he received indicates

that the Immigration Judge who decided his case also sat on the

panel who ruled on his appeal. A review of the supplemental

record reveals that Mr. Dumbraveanu's impression is erroneous; 
No. 95-60389 

-2-

the Immigration Judge before whom he appeared for his asylum

hearing was not a member of the panel who decided the appeal. 

Mr. Dumbraveanu also contends that he established a wellfounded fear of persecution based on his political opinion. We

have reviewed the record, the BIA's decision, and the briefs and

determine that the evidence does not compel reversal of the BIA's

determination. Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994).

PETITION DENIED.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GERALD NAICO,

Appellant,

v.

CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3098

[July 5, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Thomas H. Barkdull, III, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502015CA005784XXXXMB-AD.

Christopher A. Haddad of Law Office of Christopher A. Haddad, West 

Palm Beach, for appellant.

Lawonda R. Warren, Assistant City Attorney, Police Legal Advisor, 

Office of the City Attorney, Delray Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1852 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1852

       To suspend temporarily the duty on prosulfuron technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 22, 2009

 Mr. Nelson of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on prosulfuron technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROSULFURON TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      1-(4-methoxy-6-     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        methyl-1,3,5-                                                      31/2011.......
                        triazin-2-yl)-3-
                        [2-(3,3,3-
                        trifluoropropyl)
                        phenylsulfonyl]ur
                        ea (Prosulfuron)
                        (CAS No. 94125-34-
                        5) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2935.00.75)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.3
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RULE 15d-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-K of Mobile Storage Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
Report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Not applicablec)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
  /s/  Douglas WaugamanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1924 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on compound of barium 

magnesium aluminate phosphor. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. ROBERTS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on compound 

of barium magnesium aluminate phosphor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMPOUND OF BARIUM MAGNESIUM ALU4 MINATE PHOSPHOR. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.64 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 compound of barium magnesium aluminate phosphor) is 

8 amended by striking the date in the effective period col9 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1924 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14024-14025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5676]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should inform the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Neural Interfaces: Improving 
Functional Outcomes.
    Date: March 22, 2012.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To provide concept review of proposed concept review.

[[Page 14025]]

    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call). Contact Person: 
Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division 
of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, Md 20892-9304, 
(301) 435-6680, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#532038323d37322032133e323a3f7d3d3a3b7d343c25"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="27544c464943465446674a464e4b09494e4f09404851">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: March 2, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-5676 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1. Rhino Media Productions, LLC

344 N Rose St, Kalamazoo, MI 49007

(269) 459 - 1404

hello@rhino.media

2. Looking to petition for exemption on Section 333 (drone operation)

3. We’re looking to seek exemption for Section 333. 

We are a video production company and have had many requests for aerial photography. 

We’re seeking exemption because we’d like to start using our drone outside of hobby/

recreational uses. 

4. We’re seeking permission to use our drone for commercial use - researching and having 

the understanding rather than just doing it. 

5. We would not adversely affect safety because we will follow the rules when it comes to 

the use of the drone. We will also be using a pilot to operate our drone. 

6. Rhino Media Productions, LLC is seeking for exemption on Section 333 (drone 

operation). We’re seeking exemption due to the fact that we’re a video production 

company and clients are asking for aerial footage. There’s not many if at all any aerial 

photography (operated by a drone) companies in our region.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6922-6923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02551]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Seventh Meeting; RTCA Special Committee (229) Aircraft Emergency 
Locator Transmitters (ELTs) (Joint With EUROCAE WG-98)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Seventh RTCA Special Committee 229 Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
Seventh RTCA Special Committee 229 meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 16-18, 2016 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036, Tel: (202) 330-0662.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org or 
Jennifer Iversen, Program Director, RTCA, Inc., jiversen@rtca.org, 
(202) 330-0662.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of RTCA Special Committee 229. The agenda 
will include the following:

Wednesday, March 16, 2016 (9:00 a.m.-5 p.m.)

1. Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
2. Agenda overview and approval
3. Minutes Paris meeting review/approval
4. Review Action Items from Paris meeting
5. ``Phasing in'' RTCA/DO-204B, EUROCAE/ED-62B -Timeline and TOR
6. Briefing of ICAO and COSPAS-SARSAT activities
7. Other Industry coordination and presentations
8. WG 1 to 5 status and week's plan
9. WG meetings (rest of the day)

Thursday, March 17, 2016 (9:00 a.m.-5 p.m.)

1. WG 2 to 5 meetings

Friday, March 18, 2016 (9:00 a.m.-3 p.m.)

1. WG 2-5 meetings (if needed)
2. WGs' reports
3. Action item review
4. Future meeting plans and dates

[[Page 6923]]

5. Industry coordination and presentations (if any)
6. Other business
7. Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Plenary information will be 
provided upon request. Persons who wish to present statements or obtain 
information should contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may present a 
written statement to the committee at any time.

     Issued in Washington, DC, on February 4, 2016.
Latasha Robinson,
Management & Program Analyst, NextGen, Enterprise Support Services 
Division, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-02551 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
**Exhibit 10.2**

AMENDMENT NO. 5 

TO THE 

ADVISORYAGREEMENT 

This amendment no. 5 to the Advisory Agreement dated as of November 8, 2009 (the “AdvisoryAgreement”) between KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”), is entered as of July 7, 2010 (the“Amendment”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Advisory Agreement. 

WHEREAS, upon the terms set forth in this Amendment, the Advisor has agreed to amend and restate Article 16 of the Advisory Agreement andadvance funds to the Company upon the terms set forth below. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of themutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree that Article 16 of the Advisory Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

ADVANCE 

Notwithstanding anything contained in Article 9 of this Agreement to the contrary, the Advisor hereby agrees to advance funds (the“Advance”) to the Company equal to the amount by which the cumulative amount of distributions declared by the Company from January 1, 2006 through the period ending August 31, 2010 exceeds the amount of the Company’s Fundsfrom Operations from January 1, 2006 through August 31, 2010. Advisor further agrees that the Company will only be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for the Advance if and to the extent that the Company’s cumulative Funds fromOperations for the period commencing January 1, 2006 through the date of any such reimbursement exceeds the lesser of (i) the cumulative amount of any distributions declared and payable to the Company’s Stockholders as of the date ofsuch reimbursement or (ii) an amount that is equal to a 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on Invested Capital for the Company’s Stockholders for the period from July 18, 2006 through the date of such reimbursement. TheAdvisor understands and agrees that no interest shall accrue on the Advance being made under this Agreement. 

*Signature pagefollows.*

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and yearfirst above written. 

 
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.   By: /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.  Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
 
KBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC   By: Schreiber Real Estate Investments, L.P., a Manager
 
By: Schreiber Investments, LLC, as general partner
 
By: /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.  Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Manager
AFS-14-056-E 

January 6, 2014 

 

 Exemption No. 8264E 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2004-17184 

Ms. Suzanne K. Ishii-Regan 

Parent of Patrick Regan 

6726 Double Tree Court 

Anchorage, AK 99507 

Dear Ms. Ishii-Regan: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 8264, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the 

conditions and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter received November 27, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Patrick Regan for an extension of Exemption No. 8264, as amended. That 

exemption from § 121.311(b) and (c)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows 

Patrick to be secured by a personal safety belt, the E-Z-ON Modified Vest (vest) while aboard 

an aircraft. It also allows any air carrier or commercial operator, operating under part 121, to 

conduct such operations while Patrick is secured by the vest. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Patrick. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8264, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the 

FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Patrick Regan an exemption from 

§ 121.311(b) and (c)(1) which allows Patrick to be secured by a personal safety belt, the E-ZON Modified Vest (vest) while aboard an aircraft. 

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Patrick’s parents 

or a caregiver accompanying him. In addition, Patrick’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy 

of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 

hours before the date of each flight. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8264, as amended, to 

March 31, 2016, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John S. Duncan 

Director, Flights Standards Service