alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Eileen Costine, as Administratrix of the Estate of David J. Costine, Deceased, Respondent-Appellant, v St. Vincent’s Hospital & Medical Center of New York et al., Defendants, and John M. O’Leary, Appellant-Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Dontzin, J.), entered on July 17, 1990, which, *inter alia,*confirmed the findings of a Referee that validated service upon defendant O’Leary, unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.

In attempting to effect service at defendant’s home, a process server was stopped by a man at a security booth outside the private residential community in which defendant lives. The process server stated that he had legal papers for defendant. The guard, who identified himself as a superintendent, told the server he could not proceed, but that he (the guard) would forward the papers to defendant. The process server handed him the papers, which were addressed to defendant and were marked as containing legal material. By screening the visitor and representing that he would pass along the legal papers to defendant resident, the guard exhibited sufficient maturity and responsibility under the circumstances. *(See, City of New York v Chemical Bank,*122 Misc 2d 104.) Service at that location was proper because the outer bounds of defendant’s actual dwelling place were deemed to extend to the security booth, the point at which the process server’s progress was arrested. *(See, duPont, Glore Forgan & Co. v Chen,*41 NY2d 794.)

The finding of defective service upon defendant’s wife was not preserved for review by cross-motion before the referring IAS Justice. In any event, on the merits, the Referee’s credi*423bility findings on that matter should not be disturbed. Concur —Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Wallach, Ross and Kassal, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 35 (Monday, February 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 9501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03546]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending November 29, 2014

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 302. 201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2014-0209.
    Date Filed: November 26, 2014.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify 
Scope: December 17, 2014.

Description

    Application of Air Cargo Global, s.r.o. (``ACG'') requesting a 
foreign air carrier permit and exemption authority to enable ACG to 
engage in foreign scheduled and charter air transportation of property 
and mail between any point or points in the United States and any point 
or points outside the United States, and any other transportation 
authorized by additional rights made available to European Community 
carriers in the future.

 Barbara J. Hairston,
 Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register 
Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2015-03546 Filed 2-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
#### COMMERCE BANK OF UNIVERSITY CITY, a corporation, Appellee, v. EDCO FINANCIAL SERVICES, a corporation, Appellant.

No. 74-1622.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 9, 1975.

Decided Jan. 14, 1975.

Theordore F. Schwarts, Clayton, Mo., for appellant.

Jerome M. Rubenstein, Bryan, Cave, McPheeters & McRoberts, St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

Before GIBSON, Chief Judge, and HEANEY and ROSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful consideration of the record, briefs and arguments of the parties, the court has concluded that summary judgment for plaintiff Commerce Bank of University City was properly awarded by the District Court. The two questions in the case, whether personal jurisdiction was properly asserted over defendant EDCO Financial Services and whether Commerce Bank was a holder in due course of checks issued by defendant, are conclusively answered in the affirmative by the record.

Defendant’s affidavit in opposition to summary judgment establishes that defendant was doing business in the State of Missouri, the test for long-arm personal jurisdiction under Mo.Rev.Stat. § 506.500(1) (1969). Defendant further admitted in responses to interrogatories that there were no infirmities or defects in the checks. There is no dispute that Commerce Bank did give value for the checks or that EDCO did stop payment on the checks.

The defense raised by appellant EDCO under Mo.Rev.Stat. § 400.4 — 201 (1969) that the bank was an agent of its depositor and thus subject to all defenses that could be raised by EDCO against the depositor is not well taken. Central Bank & Trust Co. v. First Northwest Bank, 332 F.Supp. 1166, 1170 (E.D.Mo. 1971), aff’d, 458 F.2d 511 (8th Cir. 1972); Citizens National Bank v. Fort Lee Savings & Loan Association, 89 N.J.Super. 43, 46, 213 A.2d 315, 317 (1965). Thus, Commerce Bank, having taken the *1048checks without notice of infirmities is a holder in due course and is entitled to recover to the extent it has given credit for them.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



906 CERTIFICATION



The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The accompanying Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:

        November 24, 2009

        

        /s/   David H. RochePresident andChief Executive Officer




/s/   Steven M. CaspersExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer








---
# Memorandum U.S.Departmentof Transportation Officeofthe Secretory ofTransportation subject: Payoutprocedures as a result ofthe temporary closure of Wokal Field/Glasgow International Airport (Glasgow, Montana) (Docket DOT-OST-1997-2605)

# ~ 

# 1/{)..Q

# !/~/ From:pt{ifnis J.

# De~,**~f** 0 EAS & Domestic Analysis, X-53
To: Gregory Frazier, Resource Directorate, S-3.6
Wokal Field/Glasgow International Airport (GGW) Date: May 30, 2012

OAAMemoNo. 2012-54 Reply to Brian Swanson, X-53 Attn. of: Ext. 65392

Gulfstream (now, Silver Airways) provided notice that Wokal Field/Glasgow International Airport (Glasgow, Montana) would be closed for all flights due to runway construction, from approximately July 9, 2012, through July 28, 2012. Gulfstream currently provides subsidized EAS at Glasgow for a rate of$962.88 per arrival/departure. Ithas been ourpolicy, on a case-by-casebasis, to payEAS carriers their usual subsidyrate when airports havebeen clos,ed onthe grounds that the circumstances arebeyondthe carriers' control and there are only minimal cost savings to the carriers while they lose all ofthe revenue. The carriers would only save on fuel and a portion ofmaintenancebecause they would not be able to tumback aircraft or lay-offpersonnel. Consistent with this precedent, we ask you to compensate Gulfstream for the five nonstop and seven one-stop round trips each week to Billings, during the upcoming runway construction. Attachment

cc: Mr. Mickey Bowman, Gulfstream Prairie Aviation, Wokal Field/Glasgow International AirportSwanson, Brian (OST) From: Devany, Dennis (OST) Sent: To: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 1:00 PM Swanson, Brian (OST) Subject: FW: GGW Airport Closure

From: Mickey Bowman [mailto:mbowman(rugosilver.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 12:30 PM To: Devany, Dennis (OST); Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) Subject: FW: GGW Airport Closure Gents, Per my earlier note, the GGW airport will be dosingJuly 9 through 28 for Runway Work. Just want to make sure everyone is on the loop. MB From: Gwen Honrud Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 12:01 PM To: Linda Sackman; Michael Ritchey; Michael Purchon; Mickey Bowman; Gene Loendorf Cc: Qrairieav@yahoo.com Subject': GGW Airport Closure Good morning, The Glasgow airport is scheduled to be closed for all flights from 9 July through 28 July, provided the weather cooperates. These dates are not absolute and may shift forward or back. Prairie Aviation, as airport management, is CC'd above and can provide updates when available. Please let me know what to do on my end regarding gettingthe crewcar to Wolf Point, and howto deal with reservations. Thank you, Gwen 

### Gwen Honrud1 GGW Station

Email: ghonrud@gosilver.com Office:**+1406~708~4159** Mobile: +1831<I41-1918

1 '··"
### Martin , Michae l (OST ) r'^ ^ Tr^ - From : Wood , Bonni e S [bonnie.s.wood@umpi.edu ] -r'-'w-'-nli-V^
. . - Sent : Thursday , January26 , 201 2 8:2 0 A M '•--•' •'•jr'chhUu^i S To : EA S (OST ) Subject : Essentia l Ai rServic e fo rPresqu e Isl e /fl ? ff^P , - p A , in : cc: , I a m a Professo ra t th e Universit yo fMain e a t Presqu e Isl e an d m yhusban d i s a physicia n i n privat e practice
. Betwee n u s w e fl yi n an d ou t o fPresqu e Isl e a t leas t eigh t time s a year , primaril yfo rbusines s bu t als o fo rpleasure
. Ou rsons , wh o liv e out-of-state , als o regularl yus e th e ai rservic e t o visit
. Because , fo ral l o fus , tim e i s ou rmos t valuabl e commodity , i t i s essentia l th e Presqu e Isl e continu e t o hav e severa l nonsto p flight s eac h da yt o an d fro m Boston
. Importan t t o u s i s th e siz e o fth e plan e (primaril yfo rcomfor t an d reliability ) an d th e nonsto p servic e t o Boston
. I fth e plan e mad e anothe r sto p i n Maine , w e woul d abando n flyin g i n favo ro fdriving
. I n m ypositio n a t th e Universit yI arrang e trave l t o campu s fo rbot h gues t speakers an d als o potentia l facult yan d staf f member s interviewin g fo rjobs
. Los s o fth e qualit yo fservic e w e no whav e woul d mak e i t muc h mor e difficul t t o attrac t peopl e t o com e here
. I hav e reviewe d th e proposal s fro m th e fou rairline s an d th e onl yon e tha t I suppor t i s tha t o fPeninsul a Ai rfo rth e reason s state d above
. Sincerely , Bonni e Woo d Bonni e S
. Wood , Ph.D
. Professo ro fBiolog y Universit yo fMain e a t Presqu e Isl e 18 1 Mai n Stree t Presqu e Isle , Main e 0476 9 (207 ) 768-944 6 (207 ) 768-955 3 (fax ) Bonnie.s.wood@umpi.ed u
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5368]



[[Page 13172]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


Aduddell Industries, Inc., Capital Markets Technologies, Inc., 
Challenger Powerboats, Inc., and CLX Medical, Inc.; Order of Suspension 
of Trading

March 1, 2012.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Aduddell Industries, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports 
since the period ended September 30, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Capital Markets Technologies, Inc. because it has not filed any 
periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Challenger Powerboats, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended December 31, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
CLX Medical, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since 
the period ended June 30, 2008.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered, 
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended 
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on March 1, 2012 and terminating at 
11:59 p.m. EDT on March 14, 2012.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5368 Filed 3-1-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# L_2006101EN.01000301.xml

| 11.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 101/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 101/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 583/2006

of 10 April 2006

on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat (2),

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f).

| (2) | Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 at 11 500 t. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 at 11 500 t.

| (3) | It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 April 2006 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.

2.   Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of May 2006 for 9 416,696 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 April 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 408/2006 (OJ L 71, 10.3.2006, p. 3).

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1757 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1757

   To provide for the prepayment of a repayment contract between the 
United States and the Uintah Water Conservancy District, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 6, 2009

  Mr. Bennett introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the prepayment of a repayment contract between the 
United States and the Uintah Water Conservancy District, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PREPAYMENT OF CERTAIN REPAYMENT CONTRACTS BETWEEN THE UNITED 
              STATES AND THE UINTAH WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall allow for prepayment of the 
repayment contract no. 6-05-01-00143 between the United States and the 
Uintah Water Conservancy District dated June 3, 1976, and supplemented 
and amended on November 1, 1985, and on December 30, 1992, providing 
for repayment of municipal and industrial water delivery facilities for 
which repayment is provided pursuant to such contract, under terms and 
conditions similar to those used in implementing section 210 of the 
Central Utah Project Completion Act (Public Law 102-575), as amended. 
The prepayment--
            (1) shall result in the United States recovering the net 
        present value of all repayment streams that would have been 
        payable to the United States if this Act was not in effect;
            (2) may be provided in several installments to reflect 
        substantial completion of the delivery facilities being 
        prepaid, and any increase in the repayment obligation resulting 
        from delivery of water in addition to the water being delivered 
        under this contract as of the date of enactment of this Act;
            (3) shall be adjusted to conform to a final cost allocation 
        including costs incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation, but 
        unallocated as of the date of the enactment of this Act that 
        are allocable to the water delivered under this contract;
            (4) may not be adjusted on the basis of the type of 
        prepayment financing used by the District; and
            (5) shall be made such that total repayment is made not 
        later than September 30, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT LIHUAN SUN, a

ka Song Hui Kim , Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 11-71710 Age n c y No. A078-440-854 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 3, 2015 ** Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : GR

AB ER and WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s, a n d TUNHEIM , *** C hie f Distric t Judge . 

# FIL ED SEP 08 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honora

ble John R . Tunhe im , C hie f Distric t Judge for the U.S. Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of M inne sota , sitting by de signa tion.Pa ge 2 of 2

Lihua n Sun, a native of C hina

who c la im s to be a

c i tiz e n of North Kore a , pe titions for re vie w of a

n orde r of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls (“ B IA” ) de ny ing he r m otion to re ope n. Se e8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w the B IA’ s de nia l of the m otion for a

buse of disc re tion. Martine z-He rnande

z v . Holde r , 778 F.3d 1086, 1088 (9th C ir. 2015) (pe r c uriam ). The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in deny ing Sun’ s m otion to re ope n. Sun’ s m otion wa s untim e ly file d, se e8 U.S.C . § 1229a (c )(7)(C )(i), an d Sun fa ile d to pre se nt suffic i e nt e vide nc e of c ha nge d c onditions in China

or North Kore a

to ove rc o m e he r de la

y , se e id. § 1229a (c )(7)(C )(ii). Sun did subm it e vide nc e tha

t North Kore an a

uthoritie s ha d forc ibly

ta ke n he r fam ily

to a la bor c a m p, whic h she c la im e d wa s punishm e nt

for the ir e fforts a ssisting re fuge e s in fle e ing thec ountry , a s we ll a s e vide nc e tha

t C h ina ha d re c e ntly

“ inte nsifie d” its “ c ra c kdown” a ga inst North Kore an re fuge e s a

nd thosea iding the ir e sc a p e . B ut none of the e vide nc e that she ha s subm itte d wa s qua l ita tive ly diffe re nt from

the e vide n c e she subm itte d at he r initia l a sy lum

he aring. Se e N

ajmabadi v . Holde r , 597 F.3d 983, 987, 989 (9th C ir. 2010). TheB IA thus did not a buse its disc re tion in ruling tha t Sun fa ile d to produc e e vide nc e tha

t c onditions had m ate ria l ly c ha nge d in C hina

or North Kore a . Se e Toufighi v
. Muk ase y , 538 F.3d 988, 996 (9th C i r. 2008), as ame nde d . PE T IT IO N DE NIE D.
Exhibit
      32.2




**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of State National Bancshares,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Don E. Cosby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify,
      in
      accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
                as
                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




STATE
                NATIONAL BANCSHARES, INC.Dated:
              November 10, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Don E. CosbyDon
                E. Cosby
              Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to State National Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by State
      National Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
ATTACHMENT D

Letter dated May 30, 2007, submitted by Chemstone 

in support of its BART determination