14324 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. A preliminary 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule 

involves establishing a temporary safety 

zone as described in figure 2–1, 

paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, that 

will be enforced for less than six hours. 

We seek any comments or information 

that may lead to the discovery of a 

significant environmental impact from 

this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L. 

107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0041 to 

read as follows: 

§ 165.T07–0041 Safety Zone; Myrtle Beach 

Triathlon, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, 

Myrtle Beach, SC. 

(a) Regulated Area. The following 

regulated area is a safety zone. All 

waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal 

Waterway encompassed within an 

imaginary line connecting the following 

points: Starting at Point 1 in position 

33°45′35′′ N, 78°49′42′′ W; thence 

southeast to Point 2 in position 

33°45′31′′ N, 78°49′39′′ W; thence 

northeast to Point 3 in position 

33°45′57′′ N, 78°48′57′′ W; thence 

northeast to Point 4 in position 

33°46′00′′ N, 78°48′57′′ W; thence 

southwest back to origin. All 

coordinates are North American Datum 

1983. 

(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated 

representative’’ means Coast Guard 

Patrol Commanders, including Coast 

Guard coxswains, petty officers, and 

other officers operating Coast Guard 

vessels, and Federal, state, and local 

officers designated by or assisting the 

Captain of the Port Charleston in the 

enforcement of the regulated area. 

(c) Regulations. 

(1) All persons and vessels are 

prohibited from entering, transiting 

through, anchoring in, or remaining 

within the regulated area unless 

authorized by the Captain of the Port 

Charleston or a designated 

representative. 

(2) Persons and vessels desiring to 

enter, transit through, anchor in, or 

remain within the regulated area may 

contact the Captain of the Port 

Charleston by telephone at (843) 740– 

7050, or a designated representative via 

VHF radio on channel 16, to request 

authorization. If authorization to enter, 

transit through, anchor in, or remain 

within the regulated area is granted by 

the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative, all persons 

and vessels receiving such authorization 

must comply with the instructions of 

the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative. 

(3) The Coast Guard will provide 

notice of the regulated area by Local 

Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners, and on-scene designated 

representatives. 

(d) Effective Date. This rule is 

effective from 6 a.m. until 11:59 a.m. on 

October 13, 2012. 

Dated: February 28, 2012. 

M.F. White, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Charleston. 

[FR Doc. 2012–5784 Filed 3–8–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 59 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2006–0971; FRL–9644–9] 

RIN 2060–AR37 

National Volatile Organic Compound 

Emission Standards for Aerosol 

Coatings—Addition of Dimethyl 

Carbonate, Benzotrifluoride, and 

Hexamethyldisiloxane to Table of 

Reactivity Factors 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to 

amend the National Volatile Organic 

Compound Emission Standards for 

Aerosol Coatings final rule, which is a 

rule that establishes national reactivitybased emission standards for the aerosol 

coatings category (aerosol spray paints) 

under the Clean Air Act. This proposed 

action adds three compounds: dimethyl 

carbonate, benzotrifluoride, and 

hexamethyldisiloxane and their 

associated reactivity factors to the 

aerosol coatings reactivity rule’s table of 

reactivity factors based on petitions 

received from regulated entities. This 

action also revises two tables in the final 

rule, and corrects a typographical error 

in a test method reference. In the ‘‘Rules 

and Regulations’’ section of this Federal 

Register, we are making these same 

amendments as a direct final rule 

without a prior proposed rule. If we 

receive no adverse comment, we will 

not take further action on this proposed 

rule. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received by April 23, 2012. 

Public Hearing. If anyone contacts the 

EPA requesting to speak at a public 

hearing concerning the proposed 

regulation by March 19, 2012, we will 

hold a public hearing on March 26, 

2012. If a public hearing is held, it will 

be held at 10 a.m. at Building C on the 

EPA campus in Research Triangle Park, 

NC, or at an alternate site nearby. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules 14325 

Persons interested in presenting oral 

testimony must contact Ms. Pamela 

Garrett, U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality 

Planning and Standards, Sector Policies 

and Programs Division, Minerals and 

Manufacturing Group (D243–04), 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 

27711, telephone number: (919) 541– 

7966, fax number: (919) 541–5450, 

email address: garrett.pamela@epa.gov, 

no later than March 19, 2012. Persons 

interested in attending the public 

hearing must also call Ms. Garrett to 

verify the time, date and location of the 

hearing. If no one contacts Ms. Garrett 

by March 19, 2012 with a request to 

present oral testimony at the hearing, 

we will cancel the hearing. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2006–0971, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (202) 566–9744. 

• Mail: U.S. Postal Service, send 

comments to: EPA Docket Center 

(6102T), Air and Radiation Docket, 

National Volatile Organic Emission 

Standards for Aerosol Coatings, Docket 

ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–0971, 1200 

Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20460. Please include a total of two 

copies. 

• Hand Delivery: In person or by 

courier, deliver comments to: EPA 

Docket Center (6102T), National Volatile 

Organic Emission Standards for Aerosol 

Coatings, Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR– 

0971, Public Reading Room, EPA West, 

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2006– 

0971. The EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be confidential business 

information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means the EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your 

email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, the EPA recommends that 

you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If the EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

the EPA may not be able to consider 

your comment. Electronic files should 

avoid the use of special characters, any 

form of encryption, and be free of any 

defects or viruses. 

in the rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

further information, contact Ms. J. Kaye 

Whitfield, U.S. EPA, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards, Sector 

Policies and Programs Division, 

Minerals and Manufacturing Group 

(D243–04), Research Triangle Park, NC 

27711; telephone number (919) 541– 

2509; fax number: (919) 541–5450; 

email address: whitfield.kaye@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Organization of this Document: The 

following outline is provided to aid in 

locating information in this document. 

I. Why is the EPA issuing this proposed rule? 

II. Does this action apply to me? 

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning Reviews Executive Order 

13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

D. Unfunded Mandates 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions 

To Address Environmental Justice in 

Minority Populations and Low-Income 

Populations 

I. Why is the EPA issuing this proposed 

rule? 

This document proposes to take 

action on the National Volatile Organic 

Compound Emission Standards for 

Aerosol Coatings final rule by adding 

three compounds: dimethyl carbonate, 

benzotrifluoride, hexamethyldisiloxane 

and their associated reactivity factors 

(RFs) to the aerosol coatings reactivity 

rule’s table of RFs based on petitions 

received from regulated entities. This 

action also revises Table 1 of the final 

rule by moving the units, expressed as 

grams of ozone per gram of product (g 

O3/g product), from the table heading to 

the column entitled, ‘‘Reactivity Limit;’’ 

revises Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C by adding 

units, expressed as grams of ozone per 

gram of volatile organic compound 

(gO3/g VOC),to the column entitled, 

‘‘Reactivity Factors;’’ and corrects a test 

method typographical error by replacing 

the phrase ‘‘California Air Resources 

Board Method 3–0’’ in 40 CFR 

59.515(a)(1) with ‘‘California Air 

Resources Board Method 310.’’ We have 

published a direct final rule to make 

these same amendments in the ‘‘Rules 

and Regulations’’ section of this Federal 

Register because we view this as a 

noncontroversial action and anticipate 

no adverse comment. We have 

explained our reasons for this action in 

the preamble to the direct final rule. 

If we receive no adverse comment, we 

will not take further action on this 

proposed rule. If we receive adverse 

comment, we will withdraw the direct 

final rule, and it will not take effect. We 

would address all public comments in 

any subsequent final rule base on this 

proposed rule. 

We do not intend to institute a second 

comment period on this action. Any 

parties interested in commenting must 

do so at this time. 

The regulatory text for the proposal is 

identical to that for the direct final rule 

published in the ‘‘Rules and 

Regulations’’ section of this Federal 

Register. For further supplementary 

information, the detailed rationale for 

the proposal and the regulatory 

revisions, see the direct final rule 

published in a separate part of this 

Federal Register. 

II. Does this action apply to me? 

The entities potentially affected by 

this proposed rule are the same entities 

that are subject to the aerosol coatings 

final rule. The entities affected by the 

aerosol coatings final rule include: 

manufacturers, processors, distributors 

or importers of aerosol coatings for sale 

or distribution in the United States, and 

manufacturers, processors, distributors 

or importers who supply the entities 

listed above with aerosol coatings for 

sale or distribution in interstate 

commerce in the United States. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
14326 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review and Executive 

Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under the terms of 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735 

October 4, 1993) and is, therefore, not 

subject to review under the Executive 

Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011). 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This action does not impose any new 

information collection burden because it 

serves to add compounds to Table 2A of 

the rule and make several clarifying 

edits. However, the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

previously approved the information 

collection requirements contained in the 

existing regulations (40 CFR parts 51 

and 59) under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq. and has assigned OMB 

control number 2060–0617. The OMB 

control numbers for the EPA’s 

regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 

CFR part 9. 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act 

generally requires an agency to prepare 

a regulatory flexibility analysis of any 

rule subject to notice and comment 

rulemaking requirements under the 

Administrative Procedure Act or any 

other statute unless the agency certifies 

that the rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. Small entities 

include small businesses, small 

organizations and small governmental 

jurisdictions. 

For purposes of assessing the impacts 

of this proposed rule on small entities, 

small entity is defined as: (1) A small 

business as defined by the Small 

Business Administration’s regulations at 

13 CFR 121.201; (2) a governmental 

jurisdiction that is a government of a 

city, county, town, school district or 

special district with a population of less 

than 50,000; and (3) a small 

organization that is any not-for-profit 

enterprise which is independently 

owned and operated and is not 

dominant in its field. 

After considering the economic 

impacts of this proposed rule on small 

entities, I certify that this action will not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities. 

In determining whether a rule has a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities, the 

impact of concern is any significant 

adverse economic impact on small 

entities, since the primary purpose of 

the regulatory flexibility analyses is to 

identify and address regulatory 

alternatives ‘‘which minimize any 

significant economic impact of the rule 

on small entities.’’ 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 

Thus, an agency may certify that a rule 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities if the rule relieves regulatory 

burden, or otherwise has a positive 

economic effect on all of the small 

entities subject to the rule. 

This rule will not impose any 

requirements on small entities. We have 

determined that small businesses will 

not incur any adverse impacts because 

the EPA is taking this action to amend 

the aerosol coatings rule by adding 

compounds to Table 2A of the rule and 

making several clarifying edits. These 

amendments do not create any new 

requirements or burdens, and no costs 

are associated with these amendments. 

We have, therefore, concluded that 

this proposed rule will relieve 

regulatory burden for all affected small 

entities. 

We continue to be interested in the 

potential impacts of the proposed rule 

on small entities and welcome 

comments on issues related to such 

impacts. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This rule does not contain a federal 

mandate that may result in expenditures 

of $100 million or more for state, local 

and tribal governments, in the aggregate, 

or the private sector in any one year. 

Thus, this rule is not subject to the 

requirements of sections 202 or 205 of 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

(UMRA). 

This rule is also not subject to the 

requirements of section 203 of UMRA 

because it contains no regulatory 

requirements that might significantly or 

uniquely affect small governments. In 

this action, the EPA is amending Table 

2A by adding three compounds and 

their associated RFs, and making several 

clarifying edits. 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action does not have federalism 

implications. It will not have substantial 

direct effects on the states, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the states or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132. This action adds 

compounds to Table 2A of the aerosol 

coatings rule, and makes several 

clarifying edits. Thus, Executive Order 

13132 does not apply to this action. 

In the spirit of Executive Order 13132, 

and consistent with EPA policy to 

promote communications between EPA 

and State and local governments, EPA 

specifically solicits comment on this 

proposed action from State and local 

officials. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This action does not have tribal 

implications, as specified in Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000). This action adds compounds to 

Table 2A of the aerosol coatings rule, 

and makes several clarifying edits. 

Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not 

apply to this action. 

EPA specifically solicits additional 

comment on this proposed action from 

tribal officials. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

The EPA interprets Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as 

applying to those regulatory actions that 

concern health or safety risks, such that 

the analysis required under section 5– 

501 of the Order has the potential to 

influence the regulation. This action is 

not subject to Executive Order 13045 

because it is based solely on technology 

performance. 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 

2001)), because it is not a significant 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

12866. 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law No. 

104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) 

directs the EPA to use voluntary 

consensus standards in its regulatory 

activities unless to do so would be 

inconsistent with applicable law or 

otherwise impractical. Voluntary 

consensus standards are technical 

standards (e.g., materials specifications, 

test methods, sampling procedures and 

business practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. NTTAA directs the 

EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, 

explanations when the agency decides 

not to use available and applicable 

voluntary consensus standards. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules 14327 

This action does not involve technical 

standards. Therefore, the EPA did not 

consider the use of any voluntary 

consensus standards. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629 

(Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provision directs 

federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. 

The EPA has determined that this 

proposed rule will not have 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects 

on minority or low-income populations 

because it does not affect the level of 

protection provided to human health or 

the environment. Further, this action 

only adds compounds to Table 2A of the 

aerosol coatings rule, and makes several 

clarifying edits. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 59 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: March 1, 2012. 

Lisa P. Jackson, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2012–5647 Filed 3–8–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

46 CFR Part 98 

[Docket No. USCG–2011–0088] 

RIN 1625–AB63 

Bulk Packaging To Allow for Transfer 

of Hazardous Liquid Cargoes 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

amend its regulations concerning the 

transfer of hazardous materials to and 

from portable tanks on vessels. The 

Coast Guard proposes to expand the list 

of portable tanks approved for 

hazardous material transfers to include 

IMO Type 1 and IMO Type 2 portable 

tanks, UN portable tanks, and 

Intermediate Bulk Containers. In 

addition, the Coast Guard proposes to 

expand the list of allowed hazardous 

materials. The proposed amendments 

would provide greater flexibility in the 

selection and use of portable tanks and 

would allow for the transport of 

additional hazardous materials. The 

proposed effect would be to eliminate 

the need to obtain special permits or 

Competent Authority Approvals to use 

IMO Type 1 or IMO Type 2 portable 

tanks, UN portable tanks, or 

Intermediate Bulk Containers, or to 

transport hazardous materials not on the 

list. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be submitted on or before May 8, 

2012. Comments sent to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) on 

collection of information must reach 

OMB on or before May 8, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2011–0088 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

Collection of Information Comments: 

If you have comments on the collection 

of information discussed in section VI.D 

of this NPRM, you must also send 

comments to the Office of Information 

and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of 

Management and Budget. To ensure that 

your comments to OIRA are received on 

time, the preferred methods are by email 

to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov 

(include the docket number and 

‘‘Attention: Desk Officer for Coast 

Guard, DHS’’ in the subject line of the 

email) or fax at 202–395–6566. An 

alternate, though slower, method is by 

U.S. mail to the Office of Information 

and Regulatory Affairs, Office of 

Management and Budget, 725 17th 

Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, 

Attn: Desk Officer, U.S. Coast Guard. 

Viewing incorporation by reference 

material: You may inspect the material 

proposed for incorporation by reference 

at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 

Second Street SW., Washington, DC 

20593–0001 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. The telephone number is 202– 

372–1419. Copies of the material are 

available as indicated in the 

‘‘Incorporation by Reference’’ section of 

this preamble. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or email Lieutenant Elizabeth 

Newton, Office of Hazardous Material 

Standards, Coast Guard; telephone 202– 

372–1419, email 

Elizabeth.J.Newton@uscg.mil. If you 

have questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents for Preamble 

I. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

A. Submitting Comments 

B. Viewing Comments and Documents 

C. Privacy Act 

D. Public Meeting 

II. Abbreviations 

III. Background 

IV. Discussion of Proposed Rule 

A. Subpart 98.30—Portable Tanks and 

Intermediate Bulk Containers 

B. Subpart 98.33—Portable Tanks and IBCs 

for Certain Grade E Combustible Liquids 

and Other Regulated Materials 

V. Incorporation by Reference 

VI. Regulatory Analyses 

A. Executive Order 12866 and Executive 

Order 13563 

B. Small Entities 

C. Assistance for Small Entities 

D. Collection of Information 

E. Federalism 

F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

G. Taking of Private Property 

H. Civil Justice Reform 

I. Protection of Children 

J. Indian Tribal Governments 

K. Energy Effects 

L. Technical Standards 

M. Environment 

I. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS