alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November                14, 2008 |                                   |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                             | /s/                Gary M. Jacobs      |
|                             | Gary                M. Jacobs          |
|                             | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
#### Joseph Grier et al., Appellants, v R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. La Shellda Maintenance Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William J. Davis, J.), entered July 5, 1990, which granted the motion by defendant and third-party plaintiff to dismiss the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Constructive notice requires a showing of a hazardous condition that was not only visible and apparent before the accident, but also in existence a sufficient length of time to allow the defendant to observe and remove it. Plaintiffs’ failure to meet that test creates the possibility that the condition may have emanated only moments before the accident, through no fault or with no knowledge of the defendant, any other conclusion being pure speculation *(Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836; *Anderson v Klein’s Foods,*139 AD2d 904, *affd*73 NY2d 835; *cf., Negri v Stop & Shop,*65 NY2d 625).

When defendant’s salesman rushed to aid the prostrate injured party and noticed the slippery substance on the floor under him, he excitedly blurted out that "it must be from the cleaning”. The Trial Judge sustained the objection to this statement as hearsay. Even if this statement should have been admissible as a spontaneous utterance, its exclusion was harmless error in light of the other evidence in the case that virtually precluded the possibility that a cleaning substance spread by defendant or its agent (third-party defendant) might have remained on the floor for four and a half to six hours in a wet condition without being noticed *(see, Hansell v Galvani,**239286 App Div 1019, *lv denied*309 NY 1035). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
Order filed July 10, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00343

- CV

____________ VINCENT LILLY , Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ET AL , Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 74682I



### ORDER
According to information provided to this court, this is an appeal from a final judgment signed March 31, 2014. Appellant filed an affidavit of indigence.
See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. No contest was timely filed. Acc ordingl y, we issue the following order: The Brazoria County District Clerk is ordered to file the clerk’s record for this appeal, containing the required contents listed in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(a), with the clerk of this court on or befor e August 11, 2014.

PER CURIAM
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - MobileMail (US) Inc. - Exhibit 10.23






EXHIBIT 10.23

	 	MobileMail (US) Inc.
      

      Suite 5.18 MLS Business Centre

      130 Shaftesbury Avenue

      London, England W1D 5EU


December 28, 2006

Pan-European Consortium Ltd 

  Room 1, Salamat house, La Pourdriere Lane 

  Victoria, Mahe, Seychelles

Attention: Annabelle Jean-Louis

Dear Annabelle,

Time Extension
  – Regulation S Subscription Agreement between MobileMail (US) Inc.

  (“MobileMail”) and Pan-European Consortium Ltd. (“Pan-European”)

We write to confirm our mutual understanding, as discussed
  today, that Mobilemail and Pan-European will retroactively amend and replace
  Section 2.2. of the above noted Subscription Agreement to extend the proposed
  completion date of the financing from December 31, 2006 to March 31, 2007.

As such, please have Pan-European confirm their acknowledgment
  and agreement to the following amendment to the Subscription Agreement, by signing,
  dating and returning to us one copy of this letter. 

Pan-European and Mobilemail hereby agree that Section 2.2 of
  the Subscription Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirely and replaced with
  the following:

	2.2	Completion Date. The parties hereto agree
        that Subscriber’s subscription is irrevocable however the date of
        completion (the “Completion Date”) of the Subscriber’s
        subscription will be at such time prior to March 31, 2007 as may be determined
        by the Subscriber on providing the Company with written notice and the
        Subscription Price. Five business days following the Company’s receipt
        of such written notice and Subscription Price, the subscription will complete.
        The parties agree that should notice the Completion Date not have been
        delivered to the Company on or before March 24, 2007, the Company shall
        immediately provide the Subscriber with written notice that the Subscriber’s
        subscription will complete on March 31, 2007. Upon receipt of such notice
        from the Company, the Subscriber agrees to forthwith deliver to the Company
        the Subscription Price.



We look forward to receiving the acknowledgements at your earliest convenience.

Very truly yours,

MobileMail (US) Inc.

	Per:	/s/ Gary Flint

      _____________________________________

      Gary Flint, President and Chief Executive Officer






The amendment to Section 2.2 of the Letter of Intent between
  Mobilemail (US) Inc. and Pan-European is hereby accepted and agreed to this
  28th day of December, 2006: 

Pan-European Consortium Ltd.

a Seychelles corporation by its authorized signatory:

/s/ Gaetanne Antat                                       

  Signature of Authorized Signatory

 Gaetanne Antat

  Director, Axxess International Ltd.

  Director, Pan-European Consortium Ltd.

  Name and Position of Authorized Signatory
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1867 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on phenyl isocyanate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on phenyl 

isocyanate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHENYL ISOCYANATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.14 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 phenyl isocyanate) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1867 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
# C_2006241EN.01000401.xml

| 6.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/4

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 18 September 2006

appointing a member of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency

(2006/C 241/04)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second and third paragraphs of Article 54 thereof,

Having regard to Article X of the Statutes of the Euratom Supply Agency (1), as last amended by Decision 95/1/EC, Euratom, ECSC of 1 January 1995 (2),

1

2

Having regard to the Council Decision of 12 July 2005 appointing the members of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency (3),

3

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | A member's seat on the above Committee has fallen vacant following the resignation of Mr Simon MILLS, of which the Council was informed on 26 January 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

A member's seat on the above Committee has fallen vacant following the resignation of Mr Simon MILLS, of which the Council was informed on 26 January 2006.

| (2) | That vacancy should therefore be filled. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

That vacancy should therefore be filled.

| (3) | The United Kingdom Government submitted a nomination on 26 January 2006, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The United Kingdom Government submitted a nomination on 26 January 2006,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Ms Megan PRESTON is hereby appointed a member of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency for the remainder of the Committee's term of office, which ends on 28 March 2007.

Done at Brussels, 18 September 2006

For the Council

The President

J. KORKEAOJA

---

(1)  OJ 27, 6.12.1958, p. 534/58.

1

(2)  OJ L 1, 1.1.1995, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ C 178, 20.7.2005, p. 1.

3

---
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Chris Craddock, Chief Executive Officer and
  Chief Financial Officer of Sky Harvest Windpower Corp. (the Company)
  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
  of the Company for the period ended August 31, 2009 (the Report)
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 20, 2009

/s/ Chris CraddockChris CraddockChief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sky Harvest
Windpower Corp. and will be retained by Sky Harvest Windpower Corp. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>   U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12 MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         15,335
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         13
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               2,930
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    24,678
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         62,189
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           62,078
<LOANS>                                        685,040
<ALLOWANCE>                                    4,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 820,567
<DEPOSITS>                                     428,818
<SHORT-TERM>                                   148,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            5,394
<LONG-TERM>                                    151,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       66
<OTHER-SE>                                     86,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 820,567
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                45,513
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              7,165
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               52,678
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             15,698
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             28,891
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          23,787
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  1,294
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (11)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                21,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,020
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     5,020
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,937
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.34
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,502
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               2,489
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               4,275
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  1,512
<RECOVERIES>                                   343
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              4,400
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           4,400
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0



</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-11508

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

MCS OF TAMPA, INC.,

a Florida corporation, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID M. SNYDER, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 8:24-cv-00608-WFJ-CPT

USCA11 Case: 24-11508 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 07/23/2024 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 24-11508

____________________

Before ROSENBAUM, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

David Snyder appeals from the district court’s two April 8, 

2024 orders granting MCS of Tampa, Inc.’s motion to remand and 

denying as moot Snyder’s motion to consolidate. MCS moves to 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

The remand order is not an appealable order because it 

granted MCS’s timely motion to remand based on procedural defects in the removal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d); New v. Sports & 

Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health 

Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Humana Med. Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 

1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001). Although Snyder argues that the exception for cases removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or 1443

applies here, it does not. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); BP p.l.c. v. Mayor 

of Balt., 141 S. Ct. 1532, 1538 (2021). The case was not removed 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or 1443 because his notice of removal 

never referenced either statute, nor did it indicate that he was a 

federal officer or that he had been denied or was attempting to enforce a civil right of equality. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442, 1443; Thompson 

v. Brown, 434 F.2d 1092, 1096 (5th Cir. 1970); Greenwood v. Peacock, 

384 U.S. 808, 824 & n.22 (1966). Snyder only stated that the action 

was removable “pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1441.”

Because we do not have jurisdiction to review the remand 

order, we are unable to provide meaningful relief regarding the 

USCA11 Case: 24-11508 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 07/23/2024 Page: 2 of 3
24-11508 Opinion of the Court 3

district court’s denial of Snyder’s motion to consolidate, and thus 

the appeal of that order is moot. See Christian Coal. of Fla., Inc. v. 

United States, 662 F.3d 1182, 1189 (11th Cir. 2011).

Accordingly, MCS’s motion to dismiss the appeal is 

GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 

Snyder’s motion to supplement the record is DENIED as moot.

USCA11 Case: 24-11508 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 07/23/2024 Page: 3 of 3
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
FOURTH SUPPLEMENT TO THE MASTER LOAN AGREEMENT
(TERM REVOLVING LOAN)
 Amendment US BIO WOODBURY, LLC Borrower AGSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, PCA Lender
 RECITALS
 MLA First Supplement Second Supplement Third Supplement Fourth Supplement Loan Agreement
   AGREEMENT
  Amendment to Fourth Supplement .
 Conditions to Effectiveness of this Amendment .




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties .
   Miscellaneous .
 Effect; Ratification
 Loan Documents
 Counterparts
 Severability
 GOVERNING LAW
 WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL




---



##### 



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
FOURTH SUPPLEMENT TO THE MASTER LOAN AGREEMENT
  BORROWER:
 US BIO WOODBURY, LLC,a Michigan limited liability companyBy:
    
    /s/ Kelly S. LangleyKelly S. LangleyIts: TreasurerLENDER:AGSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, PCA,a United States corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Mark SchmidtMark SchmidtIts: Vice President




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 CONSENT AND REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY
    US BIOENERGY CORPORATIONBy: /s/ Kelly S. LangleyName: Kelly S. LangleyIts: Treasurer
EXHIBIT
31.1




AULTRA
GOLD INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302




I, Rauno
Perttu, Chief Executive Officer of Aultra Gold Inc., certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2008, of Aultra Gold Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4. The
issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the issuer including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; and




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's
internal control over financial reporting;




5. The
issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls over financial
reporting.


Date: May
      19, 2008
            By:
            /s/ 
      Rauno
      PerttuRauno
      PerttuPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P. (the
“Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, David M. Tierney, principal financial officer of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.




Date:  November
      16, 2009
              
              /s/ David M. TierneyDavid
      M. TierneyTreasurer
      and Principal Accounting OfficerReef
      Exploration, L.P.(principal financial and
      accounting officer)
  This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of § 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.