alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1812 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1812

               To suspend temporarily the duty on DMDPA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 20, 2009

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To suspend temporarily the duty on DMDPA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DMDPA.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      4'-Methoxy-2,2',4-  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        trimethyl                                                          31/2011.......
                        diphenylamine
                        (CAS No. 41374-20-
                        3) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2922.29.61)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         196,009
<SECURITIES>                                    55,004
<RECEIVABLES>                                  282,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               537,514
<PP&E>                                         302,848
<DEPRECIATION>                                 234,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 608,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,026,530
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,247
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,258,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   608,868
<SALES>                                      1,332,921
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,332,921
<CGS>                                          459,647
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,441,901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (151,824)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (151,824)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (151,824)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
##### 



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
FOURTH SUPPLEMENT TO THE MASTER LOAN AGREEMENT
(TERM REVOLVING LOAN)
 Amendment US BIO ALBERT CITY, LLC Borrower AGSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, PCA Lender
 RECITALS
 MLA First
Supplement Second Supplement Third Supplement Fourth Supplement Loan Agreement
   AGREEMENT
  Amendment to Fourth Supplement .




---



##### 



Conditions to Effectiveness of this Amendment .
 Representations and Warranties .
   Miscellaneous .
 Effect; Ratification
 Loan Documents
 Counterparts
 Severability
 GOVERNING LAW
 WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL




---



##### 








---



##### 



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
FOURTH SUPPLEMENT TO THE MASTER LOAN AGREEMENT
 
   BORROWER:
 US BIO ALBERT CITY, LLC,
 By:
    /s/
    Kelly S. LangleyKelly S. LangleyIts: Treasurer
 LENDER:
 AGSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, PCA,
 By:
    /s/
    Mark Schmidt
    Mark Schmidt
Its: Vice President




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 CONSENT AND REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY
    US BIOENERGY CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Kelly S. LangleyName:
    Kelly S. LangleyIts:  Treasurer
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000013327-JUL-201209:09 AM
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CLEARWATER BUSINESS LAW, LLC,

Petitioner,

v.

SUNCOAST PRIMATE SANCTUARY FOUNDATION, INC.; CHRISTY 

HOLLEY, NANCY NAGEL, KEN PELTIER, JON COBB, CHARLES 

O'DONNELL, and SANDRA DILLARD,

Respondents.

No. 2D23-1986

July 17, 2024

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; 

Michael F. Andrews, Judge.

Sean M. Wagner and Andrew J. Mongelluzzi of Clearwater Business Law, 

LLC, Clearwater, for Petitioner.

Lee L. Haas of Haas & Castillo, PLLC, Clearwater, for Respondents 

Suncoast Primate Sanctuary Foundation, Inc., Christy Holley, Nancy 

Nagel, and Ken Peltier.

No appearance for remaining Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Denied.
2

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

__________________________

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elonzo Watson, Jr., Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, *415New York County (Richard Lowe III, J.) rendered June 29, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the second degree and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant and his co-defendant were apprehended after two police officers saw them jump out of their van, attack and rob complainant, and leave him on the ground unconscious.

Defendant urges that he was denied due process due to the "antagonistic” defense presented by the co-defendant at their joint trial. This claim is unpreserved (CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to review it. Were we to review it in the interest of justice, we would nonetheless find it to be without merit. The core of each defense presented to the court clearly was not in irreconcilable conflict with the other. *(People v Mahboubian,*74 NY2d 174, 184.) Moreover, even if the defenses can be seen as being in conflict, there was no significant danger that the conflict alone would lead the jury to infer defendant’s guilt. *(Supra.)*

We also find that defendant’s imposed sentence was appropriate under the circumstances. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Wallach, Ross and Kassal, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40111

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALFONSO ROCHA-GAYTAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CR-594-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alfonso Rocha-Gaytan appeals his guilty plea conviction and

sentence for being knowingly and unlawfully present in the United

States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) &

(b). He argues that the district court erred in determining that

his 2004 Florida felony conviction for simple possession of

cocaine was an aggravated felony for purposes of U.S.S.G.

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) and 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B). Rocha-Gaytan

acknowledges that we have held that simple possession of cocaine

is an aggravated felony under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) in United States
No. 06-40111

-2-

v. Rivera, 265 F.3d 310, 312-13 (5th Cir. 2001), and United

States v. Hinojosa-Lopez, 130 F.3d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir. 1997). 

However, he argues that we overlooked Jerome v. United States,

318 U.S. 101 (1943), in reaching these decisions. Having

preceded Hinojosa-Lopez, Jerome is not “an intervening Supreme

Court case explicitly or implicitly overruling that prior

precedent.” See United States v. Short, 181 F.3d 620, 624 (5th

Cir. 1999). Therefore, the district court did not err in

characterizing Rocha-Gaytan’s prior Florida conviction for simple

possession of cocaine as an aggravated felony for purposes of

§ 2L1.2. See Rivera, 265 F.3d at 312-13; see also HinojosaLopez, 130 F.3d at 693-94.

Rocha-Gaytan’s constitutional challenge to the sentencing

provisions of § 1326 is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Rocha-Gaytan contends

that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a

majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in

light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have

repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that

Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v.

Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126

S. Ct. 298 (2005). Rocha-Gaytan properly concedes that his

argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit

precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further

review. 
No. 06-40111

-3-

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 10, 2012.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (William Lang, Senior Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-1521:

                    1.                     *Liberty Bell Bancorp, Inc.,*                     Marlton, New Jersey, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Liberty Bell Bank, Marlton, New Jersey.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 10, 2012.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-555 Filed 1-12-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Before the United States Department of Transportation 

Washington, DC 

September 21,2012 

Essential Air Service at 

DICKINSON, NORTH DAKOTA Docket OST-1995-697 

under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et.seq. 

This document contains Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.'s response to Order Requesting 

Proposals 2012-8-37. 

1.: .. ) ~~--··· j ' ~: 

·::.. .. /J 

co 

Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. is pleased to inform the Department of Transportation that based on 

recent increases in passenger traffic and the associated revenue, it will cease to require subsidy at 

Dickinson, ND effective February 1, 2013. Great Lakes will continue to provide scheduled air 

service subisdy free beyond that date. 

Questions and comments may be referred to: 

Michael 0. Matthews 

Vice President & Chief Financial Officer 

Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. 

1022 Airport Parkway 

Cheyenne, VVY 82001 

(307) 432-7000
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B E NI T O E S T R AD A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 74816 A ge nc yN o. A 092- 408- 863 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 20, 2011 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B e ni t o E s tr a da , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order s ust ai ni ng the go vernm ent ’ s app ea l f r o m an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s ( “ I J ” ) d e c i s i o n . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U . S. C. § 1252. W e gr antthe pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w and r e m and. 

# FI LED APR22 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 74816 2 T he B I A c onc l ude d tha tthe I Jl a c ke d j ur i s di c t i on t o r e ope n pr oc e e di ngs w i thoutthe be ne f

i tof ourde c i s i on i n R ey es -T orres v . H

older , N os . 08- 74452 & 09 -702 14 , 20 11 W L 13 12 57 0 (9th C i r. A pri l 7, 20 11 ) ( m andat e pendi ng ), i n w hi ch w e d e te rm in e dth a t 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( d ) d idn o t ap p lyto p r e c lu d e am o tio n to r e o p e n f ile da f te rth e p e titio n e rh a db e e n r e m o v e d . See R ey es -T orres , 2 0 1 1 WL 1312570, a t*2- *3 ( c i t i ng C oyt v. H older , 5 9 3 F .3 d9 0 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ) ; see a l so R ey no so-C isner os v. G on zales , 4 9 1 F. 3 d1 0 0 1 , 1 0 0 2 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 7 ) ( p e rc u r i a m) ( tr e a t i ng de partur e bar s t o m ot i ons unde r8 C . F . R . §§ 1003. 2( d) and 1003. 23( b) ( 1) as su b st an t i v el y i d en t i cal ). W e rem an dt o th e B IA i n l i g h to f th i s i n t erv en i n g case l aw. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, James B. Hersch, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Century Petroleum Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls
and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based
on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report
any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of
internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: December 17, 2007

/s/ James B. HerschJames B. Hersch, President
and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

---
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-l4(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACTI, Steven M. Wasserman, Chief Executive Officer of Alpha Security Group Corporation, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form l0-Q of Alpha Security Group Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and*5.*The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors:     a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 18, 2007 /s/ Steven M. Wasserman   Steven M. Wasserman   (Principal Executive Officer)