alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.2








CERTIFICATION





I,
      David
      G. Zahka, Chief Financial Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc. have reviewed
      Talk America Holdings, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period
      ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) and, based on the inquiries I have made
      or caused to be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as the
      Chief Financial Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc., I hereby certify
      that:





(i)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)
      the
      information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of Talk America Holdings,
      Inc.











/s/
      David G. Zahka


David
      G.
      Zahka


Chief
      Financial Officer


March
      27,
      2006
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2022

- 3665

_____________________________
J AMES E. P ALMER , Appellant,

v.

R ICKY D. D IXON , Secretary
, Florida Department of Corrections,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

. March 27, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , R OBERTS , and R OWE , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 James E. Palmer, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Kelly R. Forren, Assistant Attorney General, and Ravi N. Sharma, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5434]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of a Health Care 
Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.

    A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of experts in fields related 
to health care research who are invited by the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ), and agree to be available, to conduct 
on an as needed basis, scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ 
support. Individual members of the Panel do not attend regularly-
scheduled meetings and do not serve for fixed terms or a long period 
of time. Rather, they are asked to participate in particular review 
meetings which require their type of expertise.
    Substantial segments of the upcoming SEP meeting listed below 
will be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(6). Grant applications for the Research Centers in Primary 
Care Practice Based Research and Learning (P30) applications are to 
be reviewed and discussed at this meeting. These discussions are 
likely to reveal personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the applications. This information is exempt from 
mandatory disclosure under the above-cited statutes.
    SEP Meeting on: Research Centers in Primary Care Practice Based 
Research and Learning (P30).
    Date: March 29, 2012 (Open on March 29 from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. 
and closed for the remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center, 9751 
Washingtonian Boulevard, Gaithersburg, MD 20850.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the non-confidential portions of this meeting 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room 2038, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 
Telephone (301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as priorities 
dictate.

    Dated: February 27, 2012.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-5434 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of TAL International Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Burns, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 29, 2014/s/ JOHN BURNS John BurnsSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that

have no pre cedential value and merely decide particular cases on

the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."

Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10321

Summary Calendar

LOUIS HOWARD CONFER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

B. A. JOHNSON, Officer; P. LYNN BROOKS; MICHELLE HARTMAN,

Assistant District Attorney, Tarrant County, Texas; MARY SCHERER;

SHARONE SUTTON; C. D. BEAN, Detective; BELKER O. PASCHALL, III,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(4:95 CV 00167)

( July 31, 1995 )

Before SMITH, Emilio M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

Per curiam: *

Louis Howard Confer (Confer), a Texas state prisoner, filed a

pro se, in forma pauperis claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The

district court dismissed. We affirm.2 DISCUSSION

Confer alleged in his § 1983 complaint that he was arrested on

a burglary charge that was later dropped, but his parole was

nevertheless revoked as a result of that charge. The district

court found that the gravamen of his complaint was a challenge to

the revocation of his parole and his continued imprisonment.

Because Confer's complaint indicated that his state court petitions

for habeas corpus have been denied, the district court found that

his § 1983 claims based upon the revocation of his parole have not

yet accrued. Heck v. Humphrey, ___U.S.___, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 2372,

129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). These claims were dismissed without

prejudice to refiling.

The district court went on to hold that Michelle Hartman, the

Assistant District Attorney who prosecuted the case; P. Lynn

Brooks, the attorney appointed to represent Confer; and Mary

Scherer and Sharone Sutton, the parole officers that reco mmended

that Confer's parole be revoked, were entitled to absolute

immunity. All claims against these defendants were dismissed with

prejudice. See McGrew v. Texas Bd. of Pardons & Paroles , 47 F.3d

158 (5th Cir. 1995). To the extent that Confer's claims against C.

D. Bean and B. A. Johnson are based upon their providing testimony

at Confer's parole revocation hearing, these claims were also

dismissed with prejudice. J ohnson v. Kegans, 870 F.2d 992, 997

(5th Cir.), cert. denied , 492 U.S. 921 (1989).

Confer reurges the merits of his various claims on appeal, but3

raises no challenge to the district court's holding under Heck

, and

this Court's immunity jurisprudence. Having examined the record,

we find no error in the district court's order, which we therefore

AFFIRM.
# L_2006331EN.01002101.xml

| 29.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 331/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 331/21

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUPOL COPPS/2/2006

of 21 November 2006

concerning the appointment of the Head of Mission/Police Commissioner of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS)

(2006/853/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular the third paragraph of Article 25 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2005/797/CFSP of 14 November 2005 on the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (1), and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 11(2) of Joint Action 2005/797/CFSP provides that the Council authorises the Political and Security Committee to take the relevant decisions in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, including the decision to appoint, upon a proposal by the Secretary-General/High Representative, a Head of Mission/Police Commissioner. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 11(2) of Joint Action 2005/797/CFSP provides that the Council authorises the Political and Security Committee to take the relevant decisions in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, including the decision to appoint, upon a proposal by the Secretary-General/High Representative, a Head of Mission/Police Commissioner.

| (2) | The Secretary-General/High Representative has proposed the appointment of Mr Colin SMITH, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Secretary-General/High Representative has proposed the appointment of Mr Colin SMITH,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Colin SMITH is hereby appointed Head of Mission/Police Commissioner of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS), from 1 January 2007.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

It shall apply until 31 December 2007.

Done at Brussels, 21 November 2006.

For the Political and Security Committee

The President

T. TANNER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 300, 17.11.2005, p. 65.

1

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NARINDER JIT SINGH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-72971

Agency No. A074-588-652

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 24, 2013** 

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Narinder Jit Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

SEP 26 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-72971

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual

findings, including the agency’s adverse credibility findings. Cortez-Pineda v.

Holder, 610 F.3d 1118, 1124 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Singh claims the police arrested him twice and severely mistreated him

during his detentions. To support these claims, Singh submitted documents

including a letter from a doctor asserting he treated Singh after both arrests and an

affidavit from his father addressing Singh’s arrests, police mistreatment, and

medical treatment. The government conducted an overseas investigation and

concluded that both documents were fraudulent.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility finding based

on Singh’s submission of these documents where Singh testified that they were

accurate and that the doctor and his father would confirm his account of events, but

instead they repudiated the documents and their contents. See Desta v. Ashcroft,

365 F.3d 741, 745 (9th Cir. 2004) (upholding adverse credibility finding based on

doubts about petitioner’s supporting documents and holding genuineness of

documents went to heart of claim). Contrary to Singh’s contention, the IJ

considered his testimony and properly analyzed his credibility. Further, Singh’s

contentions regarding an investigator’s Punjabi fluency and regarding his father’s

understanding and intimidation are unsupported by the record. Accordingly,
3 11-72971

Singh’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft,

348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Finally, Singh’s CAT claim fails because it is based on the same statements

the agency found not credible, and he does not point to any other evidence in the

record that would compel the finding that it is more likely than not he would be

tortured by or with the acquiescence of the government if returned to India. See

id. at 1156-57. Contrary to Singh’s contentions, the IJ considered evidence of

country conditions and properly analyzed his CAT claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 152 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture 

to jointly conduct a study of certain land adjacent to the Walnut Canyon 

National Monument in the State of Arizona. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. KYL) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary 

of Agriculture to jointly conduct a study of certain land 

adjacent to the Walnut Canyon National Monument in 

the State of Arizona. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Walnut Canyon Study 

5 Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•S 152 IS

1 (1) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map en2 titled ‘‘Walnut Canyon Proposed Study Area’’ and 

3 dated July 17, 2007. 

4 (2) SECRETARIES.—The term ‘‘Secretaries’’ 

5 means the Secretary of the Interior and the Sec6 retary of Agriculture, acting jointly. 

7 (3) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

8 means the area identified on the map as the ‘‘Wal9 nut Canyon Proposed Study Area’’. 

10 SEC. 3. STUDY. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries shall conduct a 

12 study of the study area to assess— 

13 (1) the suitability and feasibility of designating 

14 all or part of the study area as an addition to Wal15 nut Canyon National Monument, in accordance with 

16 section 8(c) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a– 

17 5(c)); 

18 (2) continued management of the study area by 

19 the Forest Service; or 

20 (3) any other designation or management op21 tion that would provide for— 

22 (A) protection of resources within the 

23 study area; and 

24 (B) continued access to, and use of, the 

25 study area by the public. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•S 152 IS

1 (b) CONSULTATION.—The Secretaries shall provide 

2 for public comment in the preparation of the study, includ3 ing consultation with appropriate Federal, State, and local 

4 governmental entities. 

5 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the 

6 date on which funds are made available to carry out this 

7 Act, the Secretaries shall submit to the Committee on En8 ergy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Com9 mittee on Natural Resources of the House of Representa10 tives a report that describes— 

11 (1) the results of the study; and 

12 (2) any recommendations of the Secretaries. 

13 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

14 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec15 essary to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
EX-4.3



 





Exhibit 4.3




AMENDED AND RESTATED

CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

OF

PNC CAPITAL TRUST E,

A DELAWARE STATUTORY TRUST




     This Amended and Restated Certificate of Trust of PNC Capital Trust E (the “Trust”) is being
duly executed and filed pursuant to the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, 12 Del. Code
§3801 et seq. (the “Act”). The Trust was formed by the filing of its original Certificate
of Trust effective on April 16, 1998.



     The
Certificate of Trust is hereby amended and restated in its entirety
pursuant to Section 3810(c)(1) of the Act to read as
follows:


     1. NAME. The name of the statutory trust is PNC Capital Trust E.




     2. DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust having its
principal place of business in the State of Delaware are:


The Bank of New York (Delaware)

White Clay Center

Route 273

Newark, DE 19711




     3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Amended and Restated Certificate of Trust shall be effective
immediately upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trustee named below does hereby execute this Amended and Restated
Certificate of Trust as of the 9 day of January, 2007.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE BANK OF NEW YORK
(DELAWARE),
not in its individual capacity but solely as
Delaware

Trustee

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Kristine
K. Gullo	 
	 
	 	Title  	Vice
President
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                      AMERICAN COIN MERCHANDISING, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            YEAR
                                                            ENDED
                                                         DECEMBER 31,
                                                            1996
                                                            ----
          <S>                                          <C>
          EARNINGS PER SHARE:
          
          NET EARNINGS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $   2,586,000
                                                       -------------
          COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
            AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD  . . . . . . . .        5,081,608
          
          EFFECT OF SHARES ISSUED  DURING
            THE PERIOD  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           10,474
          
          EFFECT OF SHARES ISSUABLE UNDER
            STOCK OPTIONS USING THE
            TREASURY STOCK METHOD . . . . . . . . .          325,368
                                                       -------------          
          SHARES USED IN COMPUTING
            EARNINGS PER SHARE  . . . . . . . . . .        5,417,450
                                                       =============          
          EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE . . . . . . . .    $        0.48
                                                       =============
</TABLE>

(a)   Primary and fully diluted earnings per share are the same.

(b)   Net earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994 has 
      been omitted because through August 31, 1995 the Combined Companies were 
      not a single entity with its own capital structure.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

LAM M TOWNHOUSES HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. F/K/A LAMM TOWNHOUSE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. CORP.

, Appel lant

,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 386 LT Case No. 2018

- CA

- 034225

CARL T. HILL, VICKI L. HILL, HELMUT LAMM, JULIE C. LAMM, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE JULIE C. LAMM TRUST U/A DATED M A Y 7, 2010, MA R K SAFFER, TERESIT A ABORLLEILE, INDIVIDUALLY AND

,

Appellee s. ________________________________/ Dec ision filed August 1, 2023

Appeal from t he Circuit Court for Brevard County

, Davi d Dugan, Judge.

Robyn Mari e Severs, of Becker, Orlando, for Appellant.

Beverly A. Pohl, of Nels on Mullins

, B oca Raton, an d Jeremy Spr inghart, of Nelso n Mullins

, Orlando, for Appellees, Carl T. Hill and Vicki L. Hill.

No Appearance for Other Appellees.

P ER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

E DWA RDS

, C.J

., WALLIS and MACIVER

, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
ss.1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bancorp of New Jersey, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the
"Report") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, we Joseph Kliminski, Chief Executive Officer, and Eric Heyer, Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


2.
            The
      information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
      included in such report.














Dated:
May 12,
2008                                                                     /s/ Joseph
Kliminski


Joseph Kliminski


Chief Executive Officer








Dated:
May 12,
2008                                                                     /s/ Eric B.
Heyer


Eric B. Heyer


Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
Order filed April 18, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-13-00014-CV

__________

LONE STAR TRANSMISSION, LLC, Appellant

V.

WILKS RANCH TEXAS, LTD., Appellee

On Appeal from the 91st District Court

Eastland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV1242569

O R D E R

Lone Star Transmission, LLC, the appellant in this cause, has filed in this court an 

unopposed motion to abate the appeal for sixty days. In the motion, Lone Star states that 

abatement is sought “to facilitate ongoing discussions between the parties regarding a potential 

settlement” and to serve judicial economy. Lone Star also states that the motion is not opposed. 

The motion is granted, and the appeal is abated.

PER CURIAM

April 18, 2013

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.