alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsCommentaries     Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians
        
            Commentaries
 Keyword
 Type Select a CategoryTop StoriesMission/TrainingFeaturesSecretary of the AFAF Chief of StaffChief Master Sgt. of the AFCommentariesSequestration NewsSpace/TechnologyHumanitarianAFSO 21Women's History Month 1-15EnvironmentalWarrior CareDiversityDignified TransferSafetyHeritageAir Force FamilyPersonnel MattersCommander's Call TopicsHaiti Earthquake ReliefDon't Ask Don't TellSuicide PreventionWarrior GamesEnergyAircraftEtchbergerSexual AssaultOperation TomodachiOperation Odyssey Dawn2011 Appropriations InformationHurricane Irene9/11AFAWeek in PhotosThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their Words2012 Appropriations InformationAfrican American History MonthAfrican American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29Fiscal Year BudgetAir Force StoriesColorado WildfireChief of Staff ArchiveHurricane IsaacAFA 2012APP RSSAPP Airman VisualsExpeditionary OperationsHurricane SandyTransition GPSAir Force in SpaceSports/RecreationH1N1Women's History Month 16-30Oklahoma Tornado ReliefMemorial DayCOVID-19 CommentariesCOVID-19
 RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 Aug. 3, 2016Transparent leadership: An old concept for modern times
        Col. Sean P. Larkin, the commander of the National Air and Space Intelligence Center at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, discusses the need for transparent leadership and what leading by example can accomplish.  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 133721(60) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, LARRY HODGES, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 133721 COA: 272157 Wayne CC: 04-423193-AV RENAISSANCE CENTER, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s June 26, 2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5592]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 23, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Hilliard R. Crews, individually, and as a member of the Crews 
family control group (Jason L. Crews, Cynthia Michelle Leslie Crews, 
Roger L. McGee, and Stacy Crews McGee) all of Collierville, Tennessee, 
to acquire control of Triumph Bancshares, Inc., Germantown, Tennessee, 
and thereby indirectly acquire control of Triumph Bank, Memphis 
Tennessee.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 2, 2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-5592 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statements:



|      |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|----- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i)   |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-103209) pertaining to the AirTran Holdings, Inc. 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan,                         
|      | 
|(ii)  |  | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-107415) of AirTran Holdings, Inc.,                                                                      
|      | 
|(iii) |  | Registration Statement (From S-3 No. 333-127590) of AirTran Holdings, Inc.,                                                                      
|      | 
|(iv)  |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-127595) pertaining to the AirTran Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and
|      | 
|(v)   |  | Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-139917) of AirTran Holdings, Inc.                                                                       

of our reports dated February 27, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
AirTran Holdings, Inc., AirTran Holdings, Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of AirTran Holdings, Inc., included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

|                 
|-----------------
|                 
|Atlanta, Georgia 
|February 27, 2007
# L_2007139DE.01004001.xml

| 31.5.2007 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 139/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2007

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 139/40

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2006/66/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 6. September 2006 über Batterien und Akkumulatoren sowie Altbatterien und Altakkumulatoren und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 91/157/EWG

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 266 vom 26. September 2006
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 266 vom 26. September 2006

Seite 9, Artikel 21 Absatz 2 Satz 1:

anstatt:

„(2)   Die Mitgliedstaaten sorgen dafür, dass bis zum 26. September 2009 auf allen Gerätebatterien und -akkumulatoren ihre Kapazität in sichtbarer, lesbarer und unauslöschlicher Form angegeben ist.“

muss es heißen:

„(2)   Die Mitgliedstaaten sorgen dafür, dass bis zum 26. September 2009 auf allen Gerätebatterien und -akkumulatoren sowie Fahrzeugbatterien und -akkumulatoren ihre Kapazität in sichtbarer, lesbarer und unauslöschlicher Form angegeben ist.“

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Watson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered June 19, 1989, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the court erred in failing to give an alibi charge is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Cadorette,*56 NY2d 1007; *People v Lassiter,*161 AD2d 669; *People v Howard,*153 AD2d 903) and in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, we decline to reach this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6]).

The sentence imposed by the court was not excessive under the circumstances *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80; *People v Lassiter, supra).*We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Johannes Petersen, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Century Petroleum Corp.; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: September 19, 2006

 

/s/ Johannes Petersen                                                                    

Johannes Petersen, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit
      32.2**







**RAVEN
      GOLD CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Raven Gold Corp. on Form 10-QSB/A for
      the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bashir Virji, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement req  uired
      by
      Sect ion
      906
      has bee  n
      provided to Raven Gold Corp. and will be retained by Raven Gold Corp. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.











*/s/
      Bashir Virji*


Bashir
      Virji


Chief
      Financial Officer, acting


Principal
      Financial Officer, and


acting
      Principal Accounting Officer


July
      9,
      2007
NUMBER 13-15-00361-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MANUEL BENAVIDES, 

DECEASED

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. Two

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Sonya B. Rodriguez, proceeding pro se, attempted to perfect an appeal 

from an order allegedly removing her as the independent executrix of the estate of Manuel 

Benavides, deceased. Upon review of the clerk’s record, it appeared that the record 

failed to contain any such order. On August 10, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified 

appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be 

done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3(a),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect 
2

was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would 

be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant failed to respond to the Court’s notice. 

On August 27, 2015, the Clerk notified appellant that her notice of appeal did not 

comply with the appellate rules and requested correction of the defects. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 9.5(e), 25.1(d). The Clerk also advised appellant that the clerk’s record did not 

include the order she was attempting to appeal. The Clerk directed the appellant to 

request the county clerk to prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the signed 

order subject to appeal. The Clerk advised appellant that if a supplemental record 

containing the order was not filed, the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has failed 

to correct the defects or file a supplemental clerk’s record containing an appealable order.

Appellee, Roberto Benavides, has now filed a motion to dismiss this appeal based 

on the foregoing events. Accordingly, the Court, having considered the documents on 

file and appellant's failure to correct the defects in this matter, is of the opinion that 

appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, appellee’s 

motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED AND the appeal is DISMISSED. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(b),(c). Pending motions, if any, are likewise DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

10th day of December, 2015.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Martinez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered on April 4, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of first degree robbery, second degree robbery (2 counts), third degree assault, and third degree criminal possession of a weapon, and sentencing him, as a predicate felony offender, to concurrent, indeterminate prison terms of 6 to 12 years on the first degree robbery count, 4 to 8 years on each of the second degree robbery counts, and 2 to 4 years on the weapon count, and a concurrent, definite term of 6 months on the assault, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932), and giving due deference to the jury’s findings as to credibility *(People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490), we find that the People proved the defendant guilty of the robbery counts beyond a reasonable doubt. Forcible taking was proven through evidence that the defendant and his co-defendant separated the complainant from his wallet through a forcible struggle *(see, People v Rivera,*160 AD2d 419, *lv denied*76 NY2d 795, 1024), particularly given the evidence that a knife was used. Intent was sufficiently proven through the totality of facts attendant to the incident *(People v [Geraldo] Lopez,*161 AD2d 670, *lv denied*76 NY2d 791).

The court’s charge on the jury’s use of statements by a witness was deficient in that there was no indication that prior inconsistent statements could not be considered for the truth of their contents, but only as to the credibility of the witness *(see, People v O’Hare,*117 AD2d 757, *lv denied*67 *311NY2d 948). Nonetheless, since the charge as given was more favorable to the defendant, and in light of overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt *(People v Hynes,*146 AD2d 587, *lv denied*73 NY2d 978). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Ross and Smith, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Robert S. Cubbin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

By:/s/ Robert S. Cubbin

Robert S. Cubbin
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

MICHAEL EVANS MCNEAL, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

No. 84660 

FILED 

MAY 1 3 2022 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERKpF SUPREME COURT 

BY 

DEPUTY 

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a "motion for 

assistance of counsel," a "motion to resolve," and a "motion to transport." 

Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge. 

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from this 

order, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo u. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 

1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

 J. 

Hardesty 

.,414Caug 

Stiglich 

 J. 

Herndon 

cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge 

Michael Evans McNeal 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Announcement is made of the availability for licensing of the invention set forth in “Radiation Detector System for Locating and Identifying Special Nuclear Material in Moving Vehicles,” U.S. Patent 8,110,807, issued February 7, 2012. This invention is owned by the U.S. Government and is available for licensing in the U.S. in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207 to achieve expeditious commercialization of the results of federally-funded research and development.

# ADDRESSES:

Director, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Attn: General Counsel, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Mail Stop 6201, Fort Belvoir VA 22060-6201.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Licensing or patent issues, Ellen Klann, Patent Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, telephone: (703) 767-4561, fax: (703) 767-4550.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The invention uses a series of combined passive neutron and gamma ray sensors and sensor aggregators, systematically placed along a path of commercial traffic, for example an airport runway, combined with a pulsed source of monoenergetic gamma rays and low energy neutrons. The pulsed source produces a short interrogation pulse of monoenergetic gamma rays and low energy neutrons. These gamma rays induce a fission reaction in any fissile material in their path, such as in a moving vehicle, creating gamma rays and neutrons. The passive sensors located in the path of the moving vehicle detect the resultant gamma and neutron products of the reaction.

Dated: March 2, 2012.

Aaron Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2012-5545 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P