alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2015098DE.01001101.xml

| 15.4.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 98/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 98/11

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2006/17/EG der Kommission vom 8. Februar 2006 zur Durchführung der Richtlinie 2004/23/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates hinsichtlich technischer Vorschriften für die Spende, Beschaffung und Testung von menschlichen Geweben und Zellen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 38 vom 9. Februar 2006
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 38 vom 9. Februar 2006

Seite 40, Artikel 1 Buchstabe c,

Seite 41, Artikel 1 Buchstabe g und h; Artikel 2 Absätze 2, 3, 4 und 5,

Seite 42, Artikel 2 Absatz 11; Überschrift des Artikels 5; Artikel 5,

Seite 44, Anhang I, Nummer 2.2.2,

Seite 47, Anhang III, Nummer 2.2,

Seite 49, Überschrift des Anhangs IV,

Seite 50, Anhang IV, Nummer 1.4.2 erster Satz; Nummer 1.4.2 Buchstabe a,

Seite 51, Anhang IV, Nummer 1.4.2 vierter Satz Buchstabe a, und

Seite 52, Anhang IV, Überschrift von Nummer 2; Nummer 2.1; Nummer 2.3 erster, zweiter und dritter Satz; Nummer 2.4 Einleitungssatz; Nummer 2.5 Einleitungssatz:

anstatt:

„Gewebebank“

muss es heißen:

„Gewebeeinrichtung“.

Seite 41, Artikel 1 Buchstabe h:

anstatt:

„Entnahmeorganisation“

muss es heißen:

„Beschaffungsorganisation“.

Seite 41, Artikel 2 Absatz 3:

anstatt:

„Entnahmeorganisation“

muss es heißen:

„Beschaffungsorganisation“.

Seite 41, Artikel 2 Absatz 4:

anstatt:

„Entnahmeorganisation“

muss es heißen:

„Beschaffungsorganisation“.

Seite 45, Anhang II, Nummer 2.3:

anstatt:

„Gewebebanken“

muss es heißen:

„Gewebeeinrichtungen“.

Seite 51, Anhang IV, Nummer 1.7 Buchstabe c:

anstatt:

„Bestimmungsgewebebank“

muss es heißen:

„Bestimmungsgewebeeinrichtung“.

---
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5211]



[[Page 13127]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 29, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. First Palmetto Financial Corporation, Camden, South Carolina; to 
become a bank holding company upon the conversion of First Palmetto 
Savings Bank, F.S.B., Camden, South Carolina, to a state chartered 
commercial bank.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice 
President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. Carpenter Fund Manager GP, LLC, Carpenter Fund Management 
Company, LLC, Carpenter Community Bancfund, L.P., Carpenter Community 
BanFund -A, L.P., Carpenter Community BandFund-CA, L.P., SCJ, Inc., and 
CCFW, Inc., all in Irvine, California; to acquire approximately 28 
percent of the voting securities of Pacific Mercantile Bancorp, and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Pacific Mercantile Bank, 
both in Costa Mesa, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 28, 
2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-5211 Filed 3-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2010

p0322 

# Order

March 29, 2010

138424(54)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138424 COA: 275327 Wayne CC: 02-004012-01 JAMES DRAIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s January 22, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 152/2005

of 2 December 2005         

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 66q (Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2004/36/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 December 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

H.S.H. Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN            

----

(1)OJ L 339, 22.12.2005, p. 30.

(2)OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p. 76.

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

----
*Pursuant to 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth in 5

TH

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50254

Summary Calendar

IJOMA I. EGEOLU, DR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(SA-95-CV-773)

December 23, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dr. Ijoma Egeolu appeals an adverse judgment after a bench trial in his

Title VII discrimination action against the University of Texas at San Antonio.

Having reviewed the record, briefs of the parties, and controlling precedents,

and finding neither error of fact nor law in the disposition of this matter by the

trial court, and on the facts as found, conclusions of law, and authorities cited

by the district court in its very thorough Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
2

Law signed and entered on March 13, 1997, and filed on March 14, 1997, the

judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
February 6, 2015

Mr. Ryan Eisenman Yes Please Company dba Blue Heaven Productions

407 W. Riverside Drive Jupiter, FL 33469

Dear Mr. Eisenman:

This is in response to your October 7, 2014, letter sent to the docket (No. FAA-2014-0735) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Yes Please Company dba Blue Heaven Productions (Blue Heaven) for an exemption from part 21; §§ 45.23(b); 61.113(a) and (b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b)(2); 91.103(b); 91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a) and (b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(2); and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Blue Heaven to conduct aerial videography and photography for the motion picture, television, and commercial videography industries, using small unmanned aircraft systems, for closed set filming.

Manned motion picture operations require a Certif icate of Waiver or Authorization issued by the geographically responsible Flight Standard s District Office (FSDO). This process is described in FAA Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1, and is available at:

http://fsims.faa.gov/PICResults.aspx?mode=EBookContents&restricttocategory=all~menu

.

For unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) motion picture and television filming operations, which are being considered under Section 333, the FAA is reviewing the proposed operations in accordance with FAA Order 8900.1 through the exemption process.

Therefore, when considering petitions for exemption to operate an UAS for motion picture and television filming, a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) or equivalent must be provided to the FAA. The following exemptions were granted in this manner: 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11150, 11158, 11159, 11160, and 11161. Consistent application of this approach to UAS filmmaking operations assures safety is maintained.2 Because you did not submit an MPTOM or equivalent with your petition, the FAA has closed your exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information please resubmit your petition for exemption to the public docket.

Sincerely,

/s/

Lirio Liu

Director Office of Rulemaking
Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California 

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Region IX Regional Administrator 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: 

SUBJECT: NAAQS FOR NITROGEN DIOXIDE DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATION FOR 

WASHOE TRIBAL LANDS 

This letter is in response to the letter you sent on November 12,2010 providing the Tribe an opportunityto 

engage in formal or informal consultation on the designation areas under the recently revised primary 

National Ambient Air Qdty Standard (NAAQS) for Nirrogen Dioxide (m). The Washoe Tribe of 

Nevada and California has fractionated lands in Wornia and Nevada throughout several counties. 

Although the Tribe has had an Environmental Department for over 10 years and applied for funding under 

the Clean Air Act (CAA) we have never received CAA funk to establish air monitoring stations on Washoe 

lands. 

The Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California supports the efforts of the USEPA to strengthen air quality 

standards to protect public health and is recommending that areas that fa1 within the Washoe Tribe of 

Nevada and California's lands be designated at this time as ccunclassifiable" for NO NAAQS. This 

recommendation is based on insufficient data to determine whether or not the areas are attaining the revised 

1-hour NQ NAAQS. 

The Tribe is not requesting at this time formal consultation but would like to be kept informed with this 

action. Please contact Marie Barry, Environmental Director at (775) 265-8682 or 

marie.barr@washoetribe.us if you have any questions regarding our designation recommendation. 

Lloyd L. Wyatt, Vice Chairman 

cc: Marie Baq Environmental Director 

Lynelle Hartway, General Counsel 

919 Highway 395 South, Gardnerville, Nevada 89410 

(775) 265-4191 (775) 883-1446 (530) 694-2339 FAX (7%) 265-3211
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Robert J. Hanks, certify that:

1.               I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2007 of Harbor Acquisition Corporation.

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:  May 14, 2007
|        |                             |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | /s/ ROBERT J.  HANKS             |
|   | Robert J. Hanks                  |
|   | *Chief  Executive and Treasurer* |
|   | *(Principal  Executive Officer)* |

 

----
#### James BUCKNER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-84-232.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Feb. 19, 1986.

*82E. Alvin Schay, Appellate Public Defender, Norman, for appellant.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., Tomilou Gentry Liddell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

On appeal from his conviction of Escape from a Penal Institution, in the District Court of Pittsburg County, Case No. CRF-83-241, in which he received the minimum two (2) year sentence, the appellant raises a single assignment of error.

The appellant alleges that the trial court committed reversible error in overruling his motion to strike the case from the trial docket because he was exposed to the jury panel while he was in shackles, yet was not allowed to examine the jury to determine if this had any effect on them.

The record reflects that the Honorable Judge Robert A. Layden notified the attorneys while in chambers that a member of the jury had informed the court that he had seen prisoners in shackles the day before and that one of them looked a great deal like the appellant. However, the record clearly shows that the viewing was outside the courtroom, and that not all of the jury panel was present.

As the appellant correctly states in his brief, this Court has held that the viewing of an accused by several jurors outside a courtroom while he was in handcuffs is not per se reversible error. There must be a showing that the viewing was other than fortuitous or that the accused suffered some prejudice. *Pisano v. State,*636 P.2d 358 (Okl.Cr. 1981), *cert. den.,*456 U.S. 963, 102 S.Ct. 2041, 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).

The evidence as to the guilt of the appellant is overwhelming and uncontroverted. There being no evidence that the encounter was other than fortuitous, and no prejudice being shown, the judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.

PARKS, P.J., and BRETT, J., concur.
Exhibit
10.8


December 21, 2006


TO:                            Tim
Clayton


FR:                              Dave
Gartzke


RE:                              Transaction
Bonus


As interim Chief
Financial Officer your experience and assistance with this transaction has
truly been invaluable.  I want to
emphasize how much I appreciate your dedication and hard work on Project
AutoBahn and without your role as a co-project leader we would not have been
able to get where we are today.  I know
that you have sacrificed a great deal already and we still have a lot of work
ahead and your continued efforts are essential in order to complete this
transaction.


In recognition of your
efforts thus far and your continued involvement with this transaction, you have
been recommended for a transaction bonus which has been reviewed and approved
by the Executive Compensation Committee.


Contingent upon the
closing of the AutoBahn merger/sale transaction and provided you do not
terminate your contract with ADESA prior to the earlier of (1) June 30, 2007 or
(2) the closing of the merger transaction; you will be awarded $620,000.


I want to thank you again
for all your extra efforts.  With your
help, I look forward to successfully completing this transaction.


	
  /s/ David G. Gartzke

  	
   

  
	
  David G. Gartzke

  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  
	
  Accepted and agreed to as of the date

  first written above:

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ Timothy C. Clayton

  	
   

  
	
  Timothy C. Clayton

  



 


cc:                                 George
Lawrence

Brenda Flayton
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of the iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (the Trust) and iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Investing Pool LLC (the Investing Pool) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee T. Kranefuss, Chief Executive Officer of Barclays Global Investors International Inc., the Sponsor of the
Trust and Manager of the Investing Pool, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust and Investing Pool.

Date: November 6, 2009



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Lee T. Kranefuss         
|Lee T. Kranefuss *           
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal executive officer)





|* | The Registrant is a trust and the Co-Registrant is a limited liability company and Mr. Kranefuss is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global
Investors International Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant and Manager of the Co-Registrant.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10-Q Exhibit 32.2: Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (the Trust) and iShares® S&P GSCI
Commodity-Indexed Investing Pool LLC (the Investing Pool) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Latham,
Chief Financial Officer of Barclays Global Investors International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust and Manager of the Investing Pool, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust
and Investing Pool.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2007           
|                             
|/s/ Michael A. Latham        
|Michael A. Latham *          
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Co-Registrant is a limited liability company and Mr. Latham is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors International,
Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant and Manager of the Co-Registrant.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3665

_____________________________

JAMES E. PALMER,

Appellant,

v.

RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary,

Florida Department of 

Corrections,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

March 27, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

James E. Palmer, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Kelly R. Forren, Assistant 

Attorney General, and Ravi N. Sharma, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.