alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Charles M. Handy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cogdell Spencer Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: December 9, 2005 By: /s/ Charles M. Handy       Name: Charles M. Handy  Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TAL International Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian M. Sondey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
May 6, 2010

/s/ Brian M. SondeyBrian M. Sondey President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13347-13348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5422]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDCD.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDCD.
    Date: March 22, 2012.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5 Research Court, Rockville, 
MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Andrew J. Griffith, Ph.D., MD, Director, Division 
of Intramural Research, National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders, 5 Research Court, Room

[[Page 13348]]

1A13, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-496-1960, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#88effae1eeeee1fce9c8e6e1ecebeca6e6e1e0a6efe7fe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="395e4b505f5f504d587957505d5a5d17575051175e564f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the intramural research review cycle.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/about/groups/bsc/, where an agenda and 
any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 29, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-5422 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsFeatures   Air Power
        
            FEATURES
 
 Keyword:
 Categories RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 Lines of Effort: Lines of EffortThe Air Force We NeedLethality and ReadinessBuilding Tomorrow's Air ForceFaster and SmarterLocal Priority
 Article Categories Article Categories2011 Appropriations Information2012 Appropriations Information9/11AF Chief of StaffAFAAFA 2012African American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29African American History MonthAFSO 21Air Force FamilyAir Force in SpaceAir Force StoriesAircraftAPP Airman VisualsAPP RSSChief Master Sgt. of the AFChief of Staff ArchiveColorado WildfireCommander's Call TopicsCommentariesDignified TransferDiversityDon't Ask Don't TellEnergyEnvironmentalEtchbergerExpeditionary OperationsFeaturesFiscal Year BudgetH1N1Haiti Earthquake ReliefHeritageHumanitarianHurricane IreneHurricane IsaacHurricane SandyMAJCOM NewsMission/TrainingOklahoma Tornado ReliefOperation Odyssey DawnOperation TomodachiPersonnel MattersSafetySecretary of the AFSequestration NewsSexual AssaultSpace/TechnologySports/RecreationSuicide PreventionThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their WordsTop StoriesTransition GPSWarrior CareWarrior GamesWeek in PhotosWomen's History Month 1-15Women's History Month 16-30
 Tags
 Start and End Date
 Date
 Aug. 25, 2023Reclaiming Freedom: The story of A1C Hamna Zafar
        This is the story of Hamna Zafar, how she reclaimed her freedom and became a member of the United States Air Force.  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60727 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DANIEL J. RUSH, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:92-CR88PR-02

- - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Daniel J. Rush (#23183-034) has applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this appeal from the denial of his motion for production of transcripts at Government expense. Rush has also moved this court for an order requiring production of the transcripts. There is no pending appeal from Rush’s criminal conviction and Rush has not filed a post-conviction motion challenging his conviction or sentence. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f).No. 95-60727 - 2 - “[A] federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court records at government expense to search for possible defects, merely because of his status as an indigent.” Cowan v. United
States , 445 F.2d 855 (5th Cir. 1971). The motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The motion for production of transcripts at Government expense is DENIED.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00432-CR

Ricky Lynn Appelt

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1229847D)

October 17, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Justice Lee Gabriel
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549







                                    FORM 10-K
                                  ANNUAL REPORT






               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS






                          CNB Florida Bancshares, Inc.







                                   EXHIBIT 23



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As  independent   certified  public  accountants,   we  hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation  of our  report  included  in this Form 10-K,  into the  Company's
previously filed Registration Statement File No. 333-68459.


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Jacksonville, Florida
March 26, 2001
Order filed October 17, 2013

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00606

- CV

____________ HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS , Appellant

V. CARLO PARADA, PATRIC IA CONTRERAS AND PAT RICIA QUIROZ CONTRERAS, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 03419



### O R D E R
Appellant ’ s brief was due October 7, 2013

. No brief or motion for extension of time has been filed. Unless appellant submits its brief, and a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was late, to the clerk of this court on or before November 18, 2013 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
NO. 03

## -16-00239-CV



### ROSEMARYNWANKPA ) THE COURT OF APPEALS



### v. ) 

## 3rd JUDICIAL 

### DISTRICT ) 

### CECILIA OBILOM ) AUSTIN, TEXAS APPELLANT'S 

### UNOPPOSED MOTION TO 

### EXTEND TIME TO 

### FILE BRIEF 

### TO THE HONORABLE 

### JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW Rosemary Nwankpa 

### ("Appellant") to 

### urge 

### the above

### -captioned 

### motion and, 

### in support hereof, 

### shows the following: 

### I. On

### April 8, 2016, Appellant perfected her appeal. On 

### April 19, 2016, the Clerk's Record 

### was 

### filed. On October 27, 2016, the Reporter's 

### Record was 

### filed. Appellant's 

### brief must 

### therefore be 

### submitted to 

### the Court by 

### or 

### about 

### November 27, 2016. II. Due to Appellant's 

### counsel's workload, 

### an

### additional but 

### reasonable period 

### time is requested to complete and 

### submit Appellant's 

### brief, to-

### wit: by

### December 21, 2016. Prayer WHEREFORE, Appellant prays that the 

### time by 

### which Appellant must 

### file her 

### brief be extended to December 21, 2016. ACCEPTED 03-16-00239-CV 13861084 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/17/2016 4:31:28 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKRespectfully 

### submitted, 

# -- WILLIAMAPT Attorney 

### at Law 812 San

### Antonio St, Ste 401 

### Austin TX 78701 

### 512/708-8300 512/708-8011 FAX 

### billyapt@gmail

### .com Bar No 01282000 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE The 

### above-signed 

### certifies that: [X] 

### The 

### parties 

### conferred about 

### the 

### merits of 

### this motion. [ ] The above

### -signed made 

### a reasonable attempt to 

### confer 

### with opposing counsel about the 

### merits of 

### this motion. The above

### -signed 

### further 

### certifies that 

### opposing counsel: [ ] Opposes 

### this motion. [X] Does not oppose 

### this motion. [ ] 

### Is 

### believed to not 

### oppose 

### this motion for the 

### following 

### reasons: 

### N/A. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### The above-

### signed 

### certifies that a true copy 

### of the 

### foregoing

### was faxed or 

### emailed onNovember 17, 2016 to:

### Richard Anton

ANTON LAW OFFICE 

### VIA EMAIL
#### Marie Santangelo et al., Respondents, v Elliot Raskin, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rader, J.H.O.), entered March 1, 1989, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of the plaintiffs’ failure to timely to comply with an order of this court dated May 9, 1988.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

By opinion and order of this court dated May 9, 1988, the plaintiffs were directed to produce a reasonable excuse for their failure to serve a certificate of merit pursuant to CPLR 3012-a, as well as a physician’s affidavit attesting to the legal merit of their medical malpractice claim, within 45 days after service upon them of a copy of the order and opinion *(see, Santangelo v Raskin,*137 AD2d 74). The plaintiffs failed to timely comply with this court’s order. On November 30, 1988, a hearing was held to determine whether or not the plaintiffs’ attorneys had received this court’s order. At the hearing, an attorney and a secretary from the law firm retained by the plaintiffs, gave sworn testimony as to their office’s practice regarding incoming mail—"indicating, by implication, that the [order was] never received” *(Vita v Heller,*97 AD2d 464). The plaintiff’s showing was sufficient to rebut the presumption of service created by the defendant’s affidavit of service, so as to at least raise a question of fact to be decided by the finder-of-fact *(see, Vita v Heller, supra).*We conclude that the Judicial Hearing Officer’s determinations that the "plaintiffs’ lawyers never received that order”, that the defendant was not prejudiced by the short delay, and that it was preferable that the lawsuit be decided on its merits, were not irrational, arbitrary or capricious. Accordingly, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint *(cf., Swidler v World-Wide Volkswagen Corp.,*85 AD2d 239). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 96-4622

ARTHUR PURDIE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston.

David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CR-95-845)

Submitted: January 23, 1997

Decided: February 5, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Ann Briks Walsh, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston,

South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney,

Ben A. Hagood, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston,

South Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Purdie pled guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to

distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841 (1994), possession of crack cocaine with

intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841, and possession of a firearm after

conviction of a felony, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (1994). He appeals his

46-month sentence, arguing that the district court clearly erred

in enhancing his sentence for possession of a firearm during the offense. United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual,

§ 2D1.1(b)(1) (Nov. 1995). We affirm.

Purdie sold cocaine to an undercover officer on March 22 and

March 30, 1994. On November 19, 1995, a search warrant was executed at Purdie's residence. When the agents knocked on the door,

Purdie shouted, "If I can't see you, I'm going to start shooting." The

agents identified themselves and Purdie came to the door unarmed.

However, a loaded firearm was found on the dresser in his bedroom

next to 39.1 grams of cocaine and 2.7 grams of crack packaged in

small plastic bags. Purdie told the federal agent in charge that he

operated a nightclub and carried the gun for protection.

The two-level enhancement is applicable if the government shows

that a firearm was present during the offense, unless the court finds

that it was clearly improbable that the firearm was connected with the

offense. USSG § 2D1.1, comment. (n.3). At sentencing, Purdie argued that it was clearly improbable that the firearm was connected

with the offense, but the district court found that the loaded weapon's

close proximity to the drugs did not permit that conclusion. The

court's finding was not clearly erroneous.

The sentence is therefore affirmed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
 00000<ss2,BF> 00000<ss3,RO> 00000<ss4,BF> 00000<ss5,RO> 00000<ss6,RO> 00000<ss7,IT> 00000<ss8,RO> 00000<ss9,RO>

01980<ss10,BF> 00000<ss11,RO> 00000<ss12,RO> 00000<ss13,BF> 00000
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


I, Robert Gelfand, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Wallace Mountain
      Resources Corp.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this quarterly report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
      quarterly report;

4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
      registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
      auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
      persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.    I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
      significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
      significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
      recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
8th day of December, 2005.


/s/ Robert Gelfand
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer