alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 49830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20001]

[[Page 49830]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8840]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Innovation and Spectacle: Chinese Ornamental 
Bronzes'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Innovation and Spectacle: Chinese 
Ornamental Bronzes,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owner or 
custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from 
on or about October 8, 2014, until on or about March 8, 2015, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 14, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-20001 Filed 8-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris Craddock, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Keewatin Windpower
      Corp., for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2008, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                      

Date: January 13, 2009

/s/
      Chris CraddockChris
Craddock Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the: (i) Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-87658) pertaining to the ValuJet Airlines, Inc. 1993 Incentive
Stock Option Plan and the ValuJet Airlines, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan, (ii)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-91624) pertaining to the ValuJet
Airlines, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (iii) Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-98568) pertaining to the Airways Corporation 1995 Stock Option
Plan and 1995 Director Stock Plan, (iv) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-62863) of AirTran Holdings, Inc., (v) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
33-83048) of ValuJet Airlines, Inc. and, (vi) Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-82727) pertaining to the AirTran 1996 Stock Option Plan, of our report
dated January 25, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of AirTran Holdings, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 23, 2000
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1980 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain fiberglass sheets used to make 

flooring substrate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain fiberglass sheets 

used to make flooring substrate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FIBERGLASS SHEETS USED TO MAKE 

4 FLOORING SUBSTRATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1980 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Thin smooth nonwoven fiberglass sheets, approximately 

0.3 mm to 0.8 mm thick, 

comprised principally of a 

blend of 8 micron to 10 micron glass fibers bound in a 

urea formaldehyde matrix 

modified with vinyl acetate 

and acrylic latex of a kind 

primarily used as vinyl flooring substrate (provided for in 

subheading 7019.32.00). ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Transderm Laboratories Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,
      acting in the capacity of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.   The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





**SIGNATURE**
            
            **TITLE**
            
            **DATE**/s/
                Andy Yurowitz
              Andy
                Yurowitz
            
            President
                and
              Chief
                Executive
              Officer
            
            April
                12, 2007
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11


               MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                        FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                        --------------------------------
                                               1997          1996          1995
                                               ----          ----          ----
<S>                                        <C>           <C>           <C>
Basic:
   Weighted average shares outstanding       8,657,677     8,630,150     4,970,626


Diluted:
   Weighted average shares outstanding       8,657,677     8,630,150     4,970,626
   Common stock equivalents                    519,077       554,122       494,310
                                           -----------   -----------   -----------
                                             9,176,754     9,184,272     5,464,936
                                           ===========   ===========   ===========


Income before extraordinary item and
   preferred dividend requirement          $13,042,456   $ 8,706,024   $ 7,219,870
Preferred dividend requirement                    --            --            --
                                           -----------   -----------   -----------
Income applicable to common shareholders
   and before extraordinary item           $13,042,456   $ 8,706,024   $ 7,219,870
Extraordinary item                                --            --            --
                                           -----------   -----------   -----------
Net income applicable to common
   shareholders                            $13,042,456   $ 8,706,024   $ 7,219,870
                                           ===========   ===========   ===========


Earnings per share:

Basic -
   Net income before extraordinary item    $      1.51   $      1.01   $      1.45
   Extraordinary item                             --            --            --
   Net income                                     1.51          1.01          1.45

Diluted -
   Net income before extraordinary item           1.42           .95          1.32
   Extraordinary item                             --            --            --
   Net income                                     1.42           .95          1.32
</TABLE>


                                       21
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


2002 Reopened--Previously Denied Determinations; Notice of 
Negative Determinations on Reconsideration Under the Trade Adjustment 
Assistance Extension Act of 2011 Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) (Act) the Department of Labor (Department) herein 
presents summaries of negative determinations on reconsideration 
regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance for 
workers by case (TA-W-) number regarding negative determinations issued 
during the period of February 13, 2011 through October 21, 2011. 
Notices of negative determinations were published in the Federal 
Register and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271). As required by the Trade Adjustment 
Assistance Extension Act of 2011 (TAAEA), all petitions that were 
denied during this time period were automatically reopened. The 
reconsideration investigation revealed that the following workers 
groups have not met the certification criteria under the provisions of 
TAAEA.
    After careful review of the additional facts obtained, the 
following negative determinations on reconsideration have been issued.

TA-W-80,152; CompOne Services, LTD, Ithaca, New York

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned negative determinations on 
reconsideration were issued on February 21 2012. These determinations 
are available on the Department's Web site at tradeact/taa/taa--
search--form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by 
calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll-free at 888-365-
6822.

    Dated: February 24, 2012.
 Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-5387 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50492 Conference Calendar

GERALD DEWAYNE HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, NFN GOINGS, Assistant Warden at the Sanchez Unit; NFN BENAVENTE, Officer, TDCJ Sanchez Unit; NFN OAXACA, Officer, TDCJ Sanchez Unit; NFN HOWERTON, Officer, TDCJ Sanchez Unit; NFN SERNA, Sergeant, TDCJ Sanchez Unit; NFN CHAVEZ, Officer, TDCJ Sanchez Unit, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-02-CV-19-DB

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gerald Dewayne Howard, Texas prisoner # 1034561, has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal following the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c)(2). By moving forNo. 03-50492 -2- IFP status, Howard is challenging the district court’s certification that IFP status should not be granted on appeal because his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Howard has not shown that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); Days v. Johnson , 322 F.3d 863, 866 (5th Cir. 2003). Because Howard has not shown that the district court erred in certifying that his appeal is not taken in good faith, his request for IFP status is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous.
See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Howard is cautioned that the district court’s dismissal of this action, and this court’s dismissal of this appeal, both count as “strikes” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba
v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). Howard is advised that if he accumulates three strikes, he will be barred from bringing a civil action or an appeal proceeding IFP unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Hopkinson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), rendered July 20, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On February 12, 1987, at approximately 8:20 p.m., Police Officers Badamo and McMullen were patrolling in the vicinity of Beach 43rd Street and Beach Channel Drive in Rockaway, Queens, in a marked police car. They observed the defendant reach into a brown paper bag, remove a clear plastic bag containing a white powdery substance and hand it to the codefendant, John Chapman. Just after the defendant handed the plastic bag to Chapman, the two looked up, saw the police car, and threw the bags towards a nearby vacant parking lot. They were placed under arrest and the police recovered the two bags. The clear plastic bag contained seven-eighths of an *732ounce of cocaine, and the brown bag contained 49 vials of cocaine. The defendant was charged in connection with the cocaine found in the plastic bag but not in connection with the vials found in the brown paper bag. Accordingly, he contends that the trial court erred in allowing the 49 vials to be admitted into evidence against him at trial. We disagree.

Although the defendant was not charged with possession of the 49 vials, the evidence was nonetheless admissible to establish his intent to sell the cocaine found in the plastic bag *(see, People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233, 241; *People v Ventimiglia,*52 NY2d 350; *People v Molineux,*168 NY 264). We agree that there was a deficiency in the chain of custody of the vials, but find that this deficiency related to the weight to be accorded the evidence, not its admissibility.

The defendant’s argument that he was deprived of a fair trial because the prosecutor used his peremptory challenges to excuse five black potential jurors is also without merit. In response to objections by defense counsel, the prosecutor explained that he excused five prospective black jurors, three on the basis of their present employment, one due to a prior criminal record and another because of her responsiveness to defense counsel. Consequently, assuming that the defendant established a prima facie case of discrimination, the People satisfied their burden of articulating race-neutral explanations for their peremptory challenges *(see, People v Cartagena,*128 AD2d 797, 798; *see also, People v Hernandez,*75 NY2d 350, *cert granted in part*— US —, 111 S Ct 242).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1852 

To suspend temporarily the duty on prosulfuron technical. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 22, 2009 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on prosulfuron technical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROSULFURON TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5- 

triazin-2-yl)-3-[2-(3,3,3- 

trifluoropropyl) 

phenylsulfonyl]urea 

(Prosulfuron) (CAS No. 

94125–34–5) (provided for in 

subheading 2935.00.75) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1852 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In the Matter of: LAKE MATHEWS

MINERAL PROPERTIES, LTD.,

Debtor

.

------------------------------

PAUL MERRITT,

Appellant,

v.

ELISSA D. MILLER, Trustee,

Appellee. No. 21

- 55810

D.C. No. 2:20

- cv

- 07808

- GW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 18, 2023 * *

Before: GRABER, PAEZ, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Paul Merritt appeals pro se from the district court ’ s order affirming the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 25 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 55810

bankruptcy court ’s order on final fee applications

. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 158(d). “We r eview decisions of the bankruptcy court independently

without deference to the district court ’ s determinations.” Leichty v. Neary (In re

Strand) , 375 F.3d 854, 857 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm

.

Contrary to his contention, Merritt’s filing of two interlocu tory appeals

related to the bankruptcy court’s orders disallowing his proof of claim and denying

his motion to dismiss did not deprive the bankruptcy court of jurisdiction to

approve the final fee applications because Merritt’s pending appeals divested the

bankruptcy court of jurisdiction only over matters directly involved in th ose

appeal s. See In re Castaic Partners II, LLC , 823 F.3d 966, 969 n. 3 (9th Cir. 2016)

( “[T] he filing of a notice of appeal does not divest the trial court of jurisdiction

over matters or issues not appealed. ”) ; Sherman v. SEC (In re Sherman) , 491 F.3d

948, 967 (9th Cir. 2007) (“If a party wants to stay all of the proceedings in

bankruptcy court while an appeal is pending, it must file a motio n for a stay.”).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief

. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1




Independent Auditor's Consent



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(No. 333-109878) on Form S-8 of PSB Holdings, Inc. of our report dated January
20, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of PSB Holdings, Inc. and
Subsidiary as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2005, which appears in the December 31, 2005,
Annual Report on Form 10-K of PSB Holdings, Inc.


Wipfli LLP

WIPFLI LLP

Wausau, Wisconsin
March 10, 2006