alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1765 

To amend the Hate Crime Statistics Act to include crimes against the 

homeless. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 8, 2009 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. BROWN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. 

WHITEHOUSE, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. BURRIS) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Hate Crime Statistics Act to include crimes 

against the homeless. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hate Crimes Against 

5 the Homeless Statistics Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF HOMELESS. 

7 Section (1)(b) of the Hate Crime Statistics Act is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘homeless 

10 status,’’ after ‘‘sexual orientation,’’; and 


bajohnson on DSK29S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1765 IS

1 (2) by adding the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(6) As used in this subsection, the term 

3 ‘homeless status’ with respect to an individual, re4 fers to an individual who— 

5 ‘‘(A) lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate 

6 nighttime residence; or 

7 ‘‘(B) has a primary nighttime residence 

8 that is— 

9 ‘‘(i) a public or private place not de10 signed for, or ordinarily used as, a regular 

11 sleeping accommodation for human beings, 

12 including cars, parks, public spaces, aban13 doned buildings, substandard housing, bus 

14 or train stations, or similar settings; 

15 ‘‘(ii) a supervised publicly or privately 

16 operated shelter designed to provide tem17 porary living accommodations, including 

18 motels, hotels, congregate shelters, and 

19 transitional housing; or 

20 ‘‘(iii) housing of other persons in 

21 which the individual is temporarily staying 

22 due to loss of housing, economic hardship, 

23 or a similar reason.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on DSK29S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) by Mach One Corporation
("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





/s/ TAD
      M. BALLANTYNETad
      M. BallantyneChief
      Executive Officer





Date: 
May 19, 2010








A signed
original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been
provided to Mach One Corporation and will be retained by Mach One Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1893 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzenamine, 4 Dodecyl. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzenamine, 4 Dodecyl. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENZENAMINE, 4 DODECYL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Benzenamine, 4 Dodecyl 

(CAS No. 104–42–7) (provided for in subheading 

2904.10.50) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1893 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1850 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1850

       To modify and extend the suspension of duty on pinoxaden.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 22, 2009

 Mr. Nelson of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To modify and extend the suspension of duty on pinoxaden.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PINOXADEN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.60 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to pinoxaden) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``1.8%'' and inserting ``0.5%''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1







Certification of




the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




(18 U.S.C. 1350)






In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Century Aluminum Company (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Logan W. Kruger, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael A. Bless, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.
This report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Logan W. Kruger


/s/ Michael A. BlessBy:
Logan W. Kruger

By:
Michael A. BlessTitle:
Chief Executive Officer

Title:
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
March 16, 2010

Date:
March 16, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; A Low Molecular Weight Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Agonist for Thyroid Cancer (SBIR Contract)                    

*Date:*                         March 28, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680,                         *skandasa@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: ;March 2, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-5677 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1894 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1894

      To suspend temporarily the duty on N-Benzyl-N-ethylaniline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on N-Benzyl-N-ethylaniline.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. N-BENZYL-N-ETHYLANILINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      N-Benzyl-N-         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        ethylaniline (CAS                                                  31/2011.......
                        No. 92-59-1)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2921.42.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700166

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

MICHAEL J. NORTON

Ensign (0-1), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Northwest, 

Silverdale, WA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Commander Justin L. 

Hawks, JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Major David A. Peters, USMCR.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 16 November 2017

_________________________

Before HUTCHISON, PRICE, and FULTON, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
* Pursu ant to 5 T H C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 98-60211

Summary Calendar

_______________



### ABU KAMAL,

Petitioner,

VERSUS

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

_________________________

Petition for Review of an Order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals

(A70-848-392)

_________________________

June 14, 1999

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Abu Kamal petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA")

dismissi ng his petition for asylum and withholding of deportation. He argues that he is entitled to

asylum because he was persecuted while living in Bangladesh and that he has a well-founded fear that

he will be persecuted if he returns there. He avers that the BIA did not give meaningful consideration

to his evidence showing that his fear of return is well-founded.

Our review is limited to evidence included in the administrative record. S ee Miranda-Lo res v.

INS

, 17 F.3d 84, 85 (5th Cir. 1994). There is substantial evidence to support the BIA's determination2

that Kamal was not persecuted while in Bangladesh. S ee Abdel-Masieh v. INS

, 73 F.3d 579, 583 (5th

Cir. 1996). Kamal was questioned by law enforcement personnel as part of an investigation of

President Ershad but never was subjected to physical mistreatment, nor was he arrest ed. While

Kamal claims he lost responsibilities at the bank, he suffered no diminished salary.

Kamal contends that the BIA's decision does not reflect that it gave meaningful consideration to

all the relevant evidence concerning his fear of future persecution. While "we do not require that the

BIA address evidentiary minutiae or write any lengthy exegesis," id. at 585, we do require that the

BIA's decision reflect that it gave meaningful consideration to all the relevant evidence regarding the

fear of future persecution, see id.

The BIA did not adopt the findings and conclusions of the immigration judge, so its own findings

are especially limit

ed. The BIA did not, for example, address the murder of other banking officials,

the threats made on Kamal's life, or the inquiries into his whereabouts after he left Bangladesh. Nor

did the BIA address the information in the State Department reports concerning continuing human

rights abuses in Bangladesh.

The petition for review is GRANTED, and the order of the BIA is VACATED and REMANDED

for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We do not, however, intimate what conclusion

the BIA should reach on remand.
# L_2007140EN.01005901.xml

| 1.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 140/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 140/59

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 2006/88/EC of 24 October 2006 on animal health requirements for aquaculture animals and products thereof, and on the prevention and control of certain diseases in aquatic animals

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 328 of 24 November 2006
  )

On page 18, Article 1(2):

for:

‘2.   Member States shall remain free to take more stringent measures in the field covered by Article 13 of Chapter II, and Chapter V, provided that such measures do not affect trade with other Member States.’;

read:

‘2.   Member States shall remain free to take more stringent measures in the field covered by Chapter II, Article 13, and Chapter V, provided that such measures do not affect trade with other Member States.’;

and on page 35, Article 65(1):

for:

‘1.   Member States shall adopt and publish, not later than 1 May 2008, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive before 14 December 2008. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

They shall apply those provisions from 1 August 2008.’;

read:

‘1.   Member States shall adopt and publish, not later than 1 May 2008, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

They shall apply those provisions from 1 August 2008.’.

---
#### Michael A. GLENN, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. 0-84-100.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Jan. 30, 1986.

*213Elaine Meek, Asst. Appellate Public Defender, Norman, for appellant.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., Mary F. Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

BRETT, Judge:

The appellant, Michael A. Glenn, entered a plea of guilty in the District Court of Johnson County, Case No. CRF-80-45, to the crime of Obtaining Cash and/or Merchandise by Bogus Check (21 O.S.1981, § 1541.2). He received a three-year suspended sentence, which began to run October 24, 1980. As a condition of the suspended sentence, the appellant was to pay restitution and court costs. On March 4, 1983, the suspended sentence was revoked for failure to pay restitution and court costs. The trial court imposed a second three-year suspended sentence, which was revoked August 19, 1983. From this revocation the appellant has perfected an appeal.

In his first assignment of error appellant correctly asserts that the second suspended sentence imposed on appellant on March 4, 1983, was error. However, insofar as the present application for revocation of suspended sentence fell within the original three year period imposed by the trial court, such attempted reimposition of a new suspended sentence becomes harmless error. Admittedly, had the present application for revocation of the suspended sentence been filed after October 24, 1983, the court would have clearly been without jurisdiction to enforce the sentence. There seems to be little dispute but that appellant had failed to make restitution to the injured parties, as ordered by the trial court. Therefore, the violation of the conditions imposed by the court appears not to be in dispute. As stated in *Degraffenreid v. State,*599 P.2d 1107 (Okl.Cr.1979):

> In *Avance v. State,*Okl.Cr., 495 P.2d 828 (1972), this Court promulgated the rule for circumstances similar to the appellant’s. We held that an application to revoke a suspended sentence, filed before the expiration of the sentence, vests the trial court with the judicial power and authority to hear and determine the issue of revocation.

*Id.*at 1109.

In the instant case the original three year suspended sentence was imposed on October 24, 1980. The final application to revoke was filed on June 21, 1983, prior to the expiration of the original suspended sentence. Therefore, the trial court did have jurisdiction and authority to hear and dispose of the matter. The hearing and purported action that took place on March 4, 1983, was a nullity.

Secondly, appellant asserts that the three year sentence imposed at the conclusion of the revocation hearing was excessive. After reviewing the facts of this case, this Court finds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when imposing sentence. *Taylor v. State,*490 P.2d 1404 (Okl.Cr.1971).

We are therefore of the opinion that the revocation hearing was properly conducted and the judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.

PARKS, P.J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.2      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES- OXLEY ACT OF 2002    I, John E. Mack, Principal  Financial Officer of International Power Group, Ltd. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date:  November 20, 2006   /s/ John E. MackJohn E. Mack(Chief Financial Officer )
## Technical Comments Regarding the "White Papers on M ethane and VOC Emissions"

To Whom It May Concern, The attached comments are respectfully submitted to the attention of Administrator McCarthy. Many thanks, D. Marc Jacobs, Jr. Senior Vice President

6608 Route 22 • Delmont, PA 15626­2408 Ph: (724) 468­8232 • Fax: (724) 468­8230 Web: www.penneco.com 

### Jacobs <dmarcj@penneco.com> Marc Fri 6/13/2014 4:24 PM To: OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.go v>;  1 attachment Technical Comments - EPA Emissions White Papers.doc; **Page 1**  **of 1**  **Technical Comments Regarding the "White Papers on M... -**  **OilandGas.Whitepapers**

**8/ 27/**  **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than January 31, 2012.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:

                    1.                     *Montlake Capital, LLC and its control parties, Andrew Russell Dale, Montlake Capital Advisor II, LLC, Montlake Capital II, LP, and Montlake Capital II-B, LP, and their investors;*                     to retain voting shares of Coastal Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Coastal Community Bank, both in Everett, Washington.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 10, 2012.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-554 Filed 1-12-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000681 02-JUN-2014 11:04 AM