alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (the Trust) and iShares® S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Investing Pool LLC (the Investing Pool) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Latham, Chief Financial Officer of Barclays Global Investors International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust and Manager of the Investing Pool, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust and Investing Pool.

Date: August 6, 2009



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Michael A. Latham        
|Michael A. Latham *          
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and the Co-Registrant is a limited liability company and Mr. Latham is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors
International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant and Manager of the Co-Registrant.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Karen M. Spaun, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. By:
    
    /s/ Karen M. SpaunKaren M. Spaun
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 12, 2004
# L_2006337EN.01006801.xml

| 5.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 337/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 337/68

---

Corrigendum to Decision 1719/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 establishing the ‘Youth in Action’ programme for the period 2007 to 2013

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 327 of 24 November 2006
  )

On the first page of the cover in the ‘Contents’:

for:

‘Decision No 1714/2006/EC ...’,

read:

‘Decision No 1719/2006/EC ...’.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

t1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145354

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145354

COA: 306861

Clinton CC: 07

- 008187

- FC

MICHAEL WAYNE WELLMAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 2, 2012 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James White, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen G. Crane, J.), rendered October 30, 1986, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of murder in the second degree (two counts), burglary in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, and robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 25 years to life on each murder count, *8V3*to 25 years on the burglary and first degree robbery counts, and 5 to 15 years on the second degree robbery count, unanimously affirmed.

We reject defendant’s argument that the prosecutor’s summation comments improperly vouched for the credibility of the People’s witnesses and deprived him of a fair trial. The defense summation focused almost entirely upon the issue of the credibility of the People’s two major witnesses, extending to an outright statement that the jury could assume from their testimony that they "lied about everything.” Thus, the prosecutor’s suggestion to the jury that the testimony of those witnesses was, indeed, worthy of belief, supported by appropriate references to that testimony, constituted fair comment on the evidence *(see, e.g., People v Fielding,*158 NY 542), and appropriate response to the defense summation *(see, e.g., People v Marks,*6 NY2d 67, *cert denied*362 US 912). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Ross and Smith, JJ.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James B. Hersch, President and Director of
Century Petroleum Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Century Petroleum
Corp. for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Century Petroleum Corp.

Dated: December 17, 2007

/s/ James B. HerschJames B. Hersch
President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Century
Petroleum Corp. and will be retained by Century Petroleum Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-15-00503- CV In re Ronald D. Pat ton ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The petition for writ of mandamus and prohibi t i o n is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Pemberton a nd Field Filed: Aug ust 26, 2015
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
I, Frank A. Dottori, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this annual  report on Form 40-F of Tembec Inc.; 
2) Based on my knowledge, this  annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit  to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of  the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with  respect to the period covered by this annual report; 
3) Based on my knowledge, the  financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the  periods presented in this annual report; 
4) The registrant's other  certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)  and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
a) designed such    disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and    procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material    information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,    particularly during the period in which this annual report is being    prepared;

b) evaluated the    effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of    the end of the period covered by this annual report (the "Evaluation Date");

c) presented in this    annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;    and

d)disclosed in this annual    report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial    reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that    has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the    registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
5) The registrant's other  certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation  of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and  audit committee of registrant's board of directors (and persons performing the  equivalent function); 
a) all significant    deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal    control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely    affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report    financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether    or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a    significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial    reporting. 
Date: December 21, 2005 

/s/ Frank Dottori                                       Frank A. Dottori President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the quarterly report of American Basketball Association, Inc
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2007 (the “Report”),
      I, Darren Cioffi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





/s/ Darren
              CioffiDarren
                Cioffi
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              August
                14, 2007


A
      signed
      original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 I, Stefan
A. Bird, President of Salton Sea Funding Corporation (the “Company”), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
    
    the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
      December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.Dated:
    February
      25,
      2005
 
 
 /s/
Stefan A. Bird
 Stefan A.
Bird
 President
 (chief
executive officer)
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
                             THE RETIREMENT PLAN OF
                    SCHEIN PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. & AFFILIATES
                  (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 1998)

      Effective as of the dates set forth herein, the Retirement Plan of Schein
Pharmaceutical, Inc. & Affiliates (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 1998)
(the "Plan"), is amended as follows:

            Effective as of September 1, 1998, Section 6.04 of the Plan is
amended by deleting the word "or" from subsection (b), deleting the period at
the end of subsection (c) and adding ", or" to the end of such subsection (c),
and adding the following new subsection (d):

            "(d) termination of employment with the Employer pursuant to an
      employment reduction plan during the period September 1, 1998 through and
      including August 3l, 1999."
AAM-12-262-E 

May 21, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10536 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0136 

Mr. James M. Williams 

Vertical Solutions, LLC 

P.O. Box 3485 

Valdez, AK 99686 

Dear Mr. Williams: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated March 5, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Vertical Solutions, LLC (Vertical Solutions) for an exemption from part 120 of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Vertical 

Solutions to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Vertical Solutions. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one 

would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Vertical Solutions, LLC an exemption from 14 CFR part 

120 to the extent necessary to allow Vertical Solutions to cover its safety-sensitive employees 

under one testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Vertical Solutions are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of 

the Vertical Solutions part 135 operation, not under part 91 

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 08

- 801 V

Filed: September 16, 2014

Not for P ublication

*************************************

TRACY ROSE, *

Parent of CARTER ROSE

, a Minor

, *

*

Petitioner

, * Final a ttorneys’ fees and costs decision b ased

* on s tipulation of f act

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Ronald C

. Homer

, Boston, MA

, for petitioner.

Althea W. Davis , Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING FINAL ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

The undersigned awarded interim attorney s ’ fees and costs in this case on July 25, 2013.

On September 16 , 2014 , the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an

appropriate amount for final attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

Petitioner f

iled her applica tion for final attorneys ’ fees and costs on September 3, 2014.

I n accordance with t he General Order #9 r equiremen t, petitioner assert s that s he did not incur any

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master’ s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ s website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special master s will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of priva cy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public access.2

final co sts

. During informal discussions, respondent ra ised objections t o certain items in

petitioner’ s application

. Based on these objections, petitioner a mend s her application for final

attor ne ys’ fees and costs to $1 1 ,6 00

. 00

. Respondent does not object to this amount. The

undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $ 1 1 ,6 00

. 00

, representing reimbursement for final attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of

a chec k payable jointly to petitioner and Conway, Homer & Chin

- Caplan, P

. C. in the amount of

$ 1 1 ,6 00

. 00

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

court is dire cted to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 16, 2014 / s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-1390

_____________________________

BETTY CAITLIN NICOLE SMITH,

Petitioner,

v.

ZACHARY TAYLOR DANIEL,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

May 6, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate Order for Fraud Upon the Court 

on Grounds of Rule 60 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and 

Emergency Time Sensitive Motion for Stay of Fraudulent Order, 

filed on April 4, 2019, and transferred to this Court for 

consideration on April 15, 2019, are denied. All other requests for 

relief are denied. 

WOLF, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Betty Caitlin Nicole Smith, pro se, Petitioner.

Zachary Taylor Daniel, pro se, Respondent.
# L_2006104EN.01000701.xml

| 13.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 104/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 104/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 589/2006

of 12 April 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 11 April 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 11 April 2006.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 11 April 2006, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 7,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 April 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 409/2006 (OJ L 71, 10.3.2006, p. 5).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1814/2005 (OJ L 292, 8.11.2005, p. 3).

3

---