alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1787 

To reauthorize the Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 14, 2009 

Mr. BINGAMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Federal Land Transaction Facilitation 

Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Land Trans5 action Facilitation Act Reauthorization of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FEDERAL LAND TRANSACTION FACILITATION ACT. 

7 The Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act is 

8 amended— 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1787 IS

1 (1) in section 203(2) (43 U.S.C. 2302(2)), by 

2 striking ‘‘on the date of enactment of this Act was’’ 

3 and inserting ‘‘is’’; 

4 (2) in section 205 (43 U.S.C. 2304)— 

5 (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘this 

6 Act’’ and inserting ‘‘the Federal Land Trans7 action Facilitation Act Reauthorization of 

8 2009’’; and 

9 (B) by striking subsection (d); 

10 (3) in section 206 (43 U.S.C. 2305), by striking 

11 subsection (f); and 

12 (4) in section 207(b) (43 U.S.C. 2306(b))— 

13 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘; or’’ 

14 and inserting a semicolon; 

15 (B) in paragraph (2)— 

16 (i) by inserting ‘‘Public Law 105– 

17 263;’’ before ‘‘112 Stat.’’; and 

18 (ii) by striking the period at the end 

19 and inserting a semicolon; and 

20 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(3) the White Pine County Conservation, 

22 Recreation, and Development Act of 2006 (Public 

23 Law 109–432; 120 Stat. 3028); or 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1787 IS

1 ‘‘(4) the Lincoln County Conservation, Recre2 ation, and Development Act of 2004 (Public Law 

3 108–424; 118 Stat. 2403).’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
| **Exhibit 24.5**      |
|-----------------------|
|                  |
| **POWER OF ATTORNEY** |

 

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Lionel Reilly or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006, and any such amendment thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to file any such amendment to the Form 10-K, exhibits thereto and documents required in connection therewith with the SEC, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 25th day of October, 2006.

 
| /s/ Tom Latta |
|---------------|
| Tom Latta     |

 
| STATE OF TEXAS     | ) |   |
|--------------------|---|--------|
|               | ) | ss.    |
| COUNTY OF HANSFORD | ) |   |

 

On this 25th day of October, 2006, before me, a Notary public qualified for said County, personally came Tom Latta, known to me to be the identical person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the execution thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.

 
| /s/ Cynthia Copp       |
|------------------------|
| Notary Public          |
| My commission expires: |

 
| July 30, 2008 |
|---------------|
#### Rollinger, Appellee, *v.*Rollinger, Appellant.

(No. 31047

Decided June 11, 1947.)

*Mr. Samuel L. Chalfie,*for appellee.

*Mr. David L. Shannon*and *Mr. Hyman B. Rosen,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
      4(2).1

    AMENDMENT
      NO. 1

    


    DATED
      AS
      OF December 30, 2005

    


    TO
      MASTER
      FISCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT,

    


    DATED
      AS
      OF FEBRUARY 16, 2001

    


    BETWEEN

    


    THE
      STATE
      OF ISRAEL

    


    AND

    


    THE
      BANK
      OF NEW YORK

    


    


    WHEREAS,
      the parties wish to amend the Master Fiscal Agency Agreement, dated as of
      February 16, 2001 (the “Agreement”), in respect of the Procedures on Issuance of
      the Bonds to which the Agreement applies;

    


    NOW
      THEREFORE, in accordance with Section 8.2 of the Agreement, the parties hereto
      hereby agree as follows:

    


    1.           Terms
      used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning as provided in
      the
      Agreement. 

    


    2.           Section
      3.1.g of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read in full as
      follows:

    “Each
      Friday, the Fiscal Agent shall transfer the subscription funds in respect of
      which Bonds were issued through the close of the business day on the preceding
      Thursday, together with any earnings thereon, into an account to be designated
      by the State. Pending such transfer, the Fiscal Agent shall hold such funds
      in
      an interest bearing account for the benefit of the State.”

    


    3.           Article
      VIII of the Agreement is hereby incorporated mutatis
      mutandis.

    


    [REMAINDER
      OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

    



    


    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the State has caused this Amendment to the Master Fiscal Agency
      Agreement to be signed in its behalf by its Chief Fiscal Officer and the Deputy
      Chief Fiscal Officer of the Ministry of Finance for the Western Hemisphere
      thereunto duly authorized, and the Fiscal Agent has caused this Agreement to
      be
      signed by its President or Vice President, attested by its Secretary or
      Assistant Secretary.

    


    


    STATE
      OF
      ISRAEL

    


    


    BY: 
      /s/Zvi
      Chalamish        
Chief
      Fiscal Officer of the
Ministry
      of Finance for the
Western
      Hemisphere

    


    


    BY: 
      /s/Ran
      Alon          

Deputy
      Chief Fiscal Officer
of
      the
      Ministry of Finance
for
      the
      Western Hemisphere

     

    


    


    THE
      BANK
      OF NEW YORK

    


    


    BY: 
      /s/Fredrick
      W. Clark       
Name:
      Fredrick W. Clark
Title:
      Vice President

    


    


    Attest:

    


    


                            
      /s/Luis Perez        

    Assistant
      Vice President
Exhibit 10.21

                                 DESCRIPTION OF
             EGAMES, INC. 2000 EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


         On July 19,  1999,  the  Board  of  Directors  of  eGames,  Inc.  ("the
Company")   approved  the  adoption  of  a   company-wide   Employee   Incentive
Compensation Plan (the "Plan").  The amount of incentive  compensation that each
Company  employee  was  eligible  to earn under the Plan was  contingent  on the
Company achieving certain net income  objectives.  Under the Plan, each employee
was  eligible to earn a specified  percentage  of the  employee's  total  annual
salary in incentive  compensation.  These percentages  ranged from 10% of annual
salary for  administrative  employees to 50% of the annual  salary for the Chief
Executive Officer.

         No bonuses were to be earned until the Company had earned net income of
at least $1,135,000 (the "Minimum Threshold") during the 2000 fiscal year, which
amount was equivalent to the net income earned in fiscal 1998. Upon reaching the
Minimum  Threshold,  plus the amount  required to pay the bonuses  earned if the
Minimum  Threshold were achieved,  then 50% of the potential bonus to which each
employee was eligible  would be earned.  If net income of  $3,100,000  (the 100%
Threshold")  was earned during the 2000 fiscal year, plus the amount required to
pay the bonuses earned when that net income level had been  achieved,  then 100%
of the potential bonus to which each employee was eligible would be earned.

         If the  Company  earned net income  during  the 2000  fiscal  year that
exceeded  the  Minimum  Threshold,  plus the amount  required to pay the bonuses
earned,  then each  employee  would earn a bonus equal to the  percentage of the
potential  bonus to which they were eligible equal to the percentage of earnings
as measured  against the 100%  Threshold.  For  example,  if an employee  earned
$50,000  per year and was  eligible  to earn a bonus  equal to 10% of his or her
salary if the 100% Threshold were met, then that employee would be paid a $5,000
bonus if the 100% Threshold were met.

         On the date of adoption of the Plan,  based on the number of  employees
of the Company and their  respective bonus  percentages,  the Company would have
been required to achieve pre-bonus  earnings of approximately  $1,400,000 during
the 2000  fiscal  year in order to earn the minimum  bonus  (50%).  There was no
maximum  incentive   compensation  level.  If  the  Company  exceeded  the  100%
Threshold,  then additional  incentive  compensation would be earned on a linear
basis.

         Any bonuses earned were to be paid  subsequent to the completion of the
2000 fiscal year's financial  statement audit. Since the Company did not achieve
the 50% minimum  pre-bonus  earnings level,  the Company did not pay any bonuses
out under this Plan.
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*DAVID BISPHAM

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15925.

*Glenn W. Falk,*in support of the petition.

*Lisa Herskowitz,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 28, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 135 (AC 15820), is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a written statement of the complainant as constancy of accusation evidence, and that the defendant did not show prejudice from the admission of such evidence, despite the prosecutor’s closing argument that the written statement would be available for review in the jury room to support the complainant’s credibility?”
# L_2006197EN.01001401.xml

| 19.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 197/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 197/14

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION MONUC SPT/1/2006

of 30 May 2006

on the acceptance of third States’ contributions to the European Union military operation in support of the United Nations Organisation Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUC) during the election process

(2006/499/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular third subparagraph of Article 25 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2006/319/CFSP of 27 April 2006 on the European Union military operation in support of the United Nations Organisation Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUC) during the election process (1) (Operation EUFOR RD Congo), and in particular Article 10(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | At the request of the Political and Security Committee and in accordance with the tasking by the European Union Military Committee (EUMC), the EU Operation Commander and EU Force Commander held the Force Generation and Manning Conferences on 3 and 10 May 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

At the request of the Political and Security Committee and in accordance with the tasking by the European Union Military Committee (EUMC), the EU Operation Commander and EU Force Commander held the Force Generation and Manning Conferences on 3 and 10 May 2006.

| (2) | Following recommendations on a contribution from Turkey by the EU Operation Commander and the EUMC, the contribution from Turkey should be accepted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following recommendations on a contribution from Turkey by the EU Operation Commander and the EUMC, the contribution from Turkey should be accepted.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 6 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the European Union which have defence implications, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 6 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the European Union which have defence implications,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Third States’ contributions

Following the Force Generation and Manning Conferences, the contribution from Turkey shall be accepted for the EU military operation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in support of MONUC during the election process.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 30 May 2006.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

F.J. KUGLITSCH

---

(1)  
  OJ L 116, 29.4.2006, p. 98.

1

---
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly report of Frezer, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 17, 2006

|By: | /s/ David Koos         
|--- | -----------------------
|    | David Koos             
|    | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Frezer, Inc. and will be retained by Frezer, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, March 22, 2012, 8 a.m. to March 23, 2012, 5 p.m., Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, 5701 Marinelli Road, Bethesda, MD 20852 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 9, 2011, 76 FR 76981.                

This notice is being amended to change the ending time and date from 5 p.m. March 23, 2012 to 6 p.m. March 22, 2012. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: February 27, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-5288 Filed 3-2-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,145,265
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  357,149
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,001)
<INVENTORY>                                    420,819
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,144,194
<PP&E>                                      31,506,417
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,811,941)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,562,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,041,422
<BONDS>                                      5,959,959
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        9,153,078
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    14,175,109
<OTHER-SE>                                     295,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,562,985
<SALES>                                     40,159,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            40,159,715
<CGS>                                       12,480,215
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,480,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            26,244,503
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,280
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             514,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                862,697
<INCOME-TAX>                                   284,184
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            578,713
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   578,713
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Vincent Verdiramo, President of Serino 1, Corp. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  September 14, 2005

/s/ Vincent L. Verdiramo

___________________________



President
*** E.O. 12866 Review - Draft - Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review ***

Category

Primary 

Estimate Low Estimate High Estimate

Year 

Dollar

Discount 

Rate

Period 

Covered Notes

Benefits

$10,100.0 NA NA 2012 7% 2015-2059

$11,800.0 NA NA 2012 3% 2015-2059

NA NA NA NA 7% NA

NA NA NA NA 3% NA

Qualitative

Costs

$1,300.0 NA NA 2012 7% 2015-2059

$1,400.0 NA NA 2012 3% 2015-2059

NA NA NA 7%

NA NA NA 3%

Qualitative

Transfers

NA NA NA 7%

NA NA NA 3%

From/To From: To:

NA NA NA 7%

NA NA NA 3%

From/To From: To:

Effects

State, Local, 

and/or Tribal 

Government

Small Business

Wages

Growth

Other Annualized 

Monetized 

($millions/year)

Federal 

Annualized 

Monetized 

($millions/year)

The cost analysis does not include any cost savings associated with the 

small entity flexibilities

Annualized 

Monetized 

($millions/year)

Annualized 

Quantified 

Estimates Units

Annualized 

Monetized 

($millions/year)

Annualized 

Quantified (tons)

EPA conducted a Small Business Advocacy Review (SBAR) Panel as required by the RFA/SBREFA. The agencies are 

proposing flexibilities for small businesses meeting the criteria specified in 13 CFR 121.201 that would ensure the rule 

does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The proposed flexibilities include 

additional lead time, less stringent standards, and reduced compliance requirements.

This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

These rules will be implemented at the Federal level and impose compliance costs on vehicle manufacturers. Tribal 

governments would be affected only to the extent they purchase and use regulated vehicles. Thus, Executive Order 13175 

does not apply to these rules.

Note: The present value of costs and 

benefits reflect costs/benefits that accrue 

over the lifetime of each 2018-2029 MY 

vehicle, discounted back to 2015. 

Annualized benefits represent total benefits 

(including fuel savings, the social cost of 

carbon, energy security, and other economic 

impacts) from EPA's model year analysis. 

The model year benefits presented here are 

also based on an average social cost of 

carbon (SCC) value derived using a 3% 

discount rate; as such, annualized SCC 

benefits always use a 3% discount rate. 

More details regarding the benefits can be 

found in the preamble Section IX.

Note: Annualized costs include costs for 

new technology along with compliance, 

R&D and increased maintenance. More 

details regarding costs can be found in 

preamble Section IX.