alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13348-13349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5353]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Approval of VIP Chemical, Inc., As a Commercial Gauger

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of approval of VIP Chemical, Inc., as a commercial 
gauger.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, VIP 
Chemical, Inc., 4026 FM 1694, Robstown, TX 78310, has been approved to 
gauge petroleum, petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable 
oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 
151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct gauger services 
should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it 
is approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the 
specific gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding 
the specific gauger service this entity is approved to perform may be 
directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 
344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c0f0e1c42000d0e041d2c08041f420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="37545547195b56555f4677535f4419505841">[email protected]</span></a>. Please 
reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP 
approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.
    http://cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/trade/automated/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/gaulist.ctt/gaulist.pdf

DATES: The approval of VIP Chemical, Inc., as commercial gauger became 
effective on June 16, 2011. The next triennial inspection date will be 
scheduled for June 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan McGrath, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.


[[Page 13349]]


    Dated: February 28, 2012.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-5353 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0458

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DONALD COLEN BRYANT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 30, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 24 2023

07/24/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0458
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5294]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

Notice of Sunshine Act Meetings

DATES: Time and Date: Wednesday, March 14, 2012, at 11 a.m.

Place: Commission Hearing Room, 901 New York Avenue NW., Suite 200, 
Washington, DC 20268-0001.

Status: Part of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public. The open session will be 
audiocast. The audiocast may be accessed via the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.prc.gov. A period for public comment will be offered 
following consideration of the last numbered item in the open session.

Matters to be Considered: The agenda for the Commission's March 14, 
2012 meeting includes the items identified below.

Portions Open to the Public: 1. Report on legislative activities.
    2. Report on status of Commission dockets.
    3. Report from the Office of the Secretary and Administration.
    4. Report on analytical tools used by Commission staff.
    5. Report on international activities and inbound international 
mail revenues and costs.
    6. Strategic overview of the military postal service.
    Chairman's public comment period.

Portion Closed to the Public:
    7. Discussion of pending litigation.

Contact Person for More Information: Stephen L. Sharfman, General 
Counsel, Postal Regulatory Commission, 901 New York Avenue NW., Suite 
200, Washington, DC 20268-0001, at 202-789-6820 (for agenda-related 
inquiries) and Shoshana M. Grove, Secretary of the Commission, at 202-
789-6800 or [email protected] (for inquiries related to meeting 
location, access for handicapped or disabled persons, the audiocast, or 
similar matters).

    By the Commission.

    Dated: February 29, 2012.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5294 Filed 2-29-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30959

STELIOS COUTSODONTIS

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

SEA TRADE MARITIME CORP, in personam

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

WIENER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-Appellant Stelios Coutsodontis appeals the judgment of the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana vacating its

earlier arrest warrant of the M/V ATHENA, a vessel titled to Sea Trade

Maritime Corporation. The district court determined that it lacked in rem

admiralty jurisdiction under Rule D of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty

and Maritime Claims to hear any of the claims asserted by Coutsodontis

because he had not pleaded a maritime tort or a contract relating to the “ship in

its use as such, or to commerce or navigation on navigable waters, or to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-30959

 Coutsodontis v. M/V ATHENA, Civ. A. No. 08-4285,2008 WL 4330236, at *2 (E.D. 1

La. Sept.. 16, 2008).

2

transportation by sea or to maritime employment.” After careful consideration 1

of the facts and applicable law gleaned from our examination of the record on

appeal and the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we are convinced that

the judgment of the district court vacating its arrest warrant and dismissing this

action should be and hereby is, 

AFFIRMED.
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT TO THE

HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANY

401(K) PLAN AND TRUST



This Amendment to the Houston Exploration Company 401(K) Plan and Trust (the
“Plan”), is made on behalf of the Houston Exploration Company (the
“Company”), the sponsor of the Plan, and is effective as of immediately prior to,
and contingent upon, the effective time of the merger contemplated by the Agreement and
Plan of Merger dated January 7, 2007, by and among Forest Oil Corporation, a New York
corporation (“Parent”), MJCO Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent and the Company.



1. The Adoption Agreement for the Plan is hereby amended to add the following new Section 69
thereto:





69. Change of Control. Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to
the contrary, the Employer Contributions credited to each Participant’s account
under the Plan shall automatically become one hundred percent (100%) vested upon a
“Change of Control” (as that term is defined in the Employer’s 2004 Long Term
Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time); provided that
such Participant is employed by the Employer immediately prior to the effective
time of such Change of Control.


2. Except as specifically modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain
in effect.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
Roger B. Rice	 
	 	 	Name:  Roger B. Rice	 	 
	 	 	Title:  Senior Vice President - Administration
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24311-24312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10145]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9118]

Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``North Cape''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following Determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.

[[Page 24312]]

2459), E. O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 
note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, 
Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as 
appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I 
hereby determine that the object to be included in the exhibition 
``North Cape'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at 
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about 
May 15, 2015, until on or about May 15, 2017, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
description of the imported object, contact the Office of Public 
Diplomacy and Public Affairs in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. 
Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email: 
section2459@state.gov). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: April 20, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-10145 Filed 4-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      Exhibit 23



                      [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP]


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 333-23995 and 333-34521) on Form S-8 of BostonFed Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") of our report, dated January 21, 1999, related to the consolidated
balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998,
which report is incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 29, 1999
<PAGE>


                                    Exhibit 23.1



                 Consent Of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Cutter & Buck Inc. of our report dated June 12, 1998, included in the 1998
Annual Report to Shareholders of Cutter & Buck Inc.


Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Cutter & Buck Inc.
listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. 
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.


We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements (Form S-8) pertaining to the 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan, 1995 
Nonemployee Director Stock Incentive Plan, 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan 
and the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated June 12, 1998, with 
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Cutter & Buck Inc. 
incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding 
paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in this 
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended April 30, 1998.


                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 


Seattle, Washington

July 24, 1998
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1853 

To extend the suspension of duty on mefenoxam technical. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 22, 2009 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on mefenoxam technical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MEFENOXAM TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.58 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 mefenoxam technical) is amended by striking the date in 

7 the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Hall, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered November 16, 1988, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Rockland County, for resentencing in accordance herewith.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s challenge of the trial court’s ruling permitting the People to elicit testimony regarding a prior consistent statement of a key prosecution witness is without merit. Generally, the testimony of a witness may not be corroborated or bolstered by evidence of prior consistent statements made before trial *(see, People v Davis,*44 NY2d 269). When, however, the witness’s testimony is assailed as a recent fabrication, given under motives of interest or bias, the party calling the witness, in order to rebut that inference, may show that *730the witness made statements similar to his trial testimony at some earlier time when he was free from the alleged bias *(see, People v McClean,*69 NY2d 426; *People v Baker,*23 NY2d 307). Inasmuch as defense counsel’s extensive questioning of the witness Córtese was designed to create the inference that his testimony as to the defendant’s admission of his complicity in the burglary was of recent invention, given to obtain leniency from law enforcement officials relative to criminal charges pending against him, the People were properly permitted to elicit from another witness that Córtese had related his conversation with the defendant to him prior to trial.

The sentencing court’s order of restitution in the amount of $450 is supported by the record, specifically, the victim’s detailed trial testimony regarding his loss, and was, accordingly, appropriate *(see,*Penal Law § 60.27 [2]; *People v King,*158 AD2d 972; *People v Welsher,*154 AD2d 915). The matter must, however, be remitted for resentencing since the trial court failed to pronounce sentence on each count, namely petit larceny and criminal mischief in the fourth degree *(see,*CPL 380.20; *People v Goddard,*112 AD2d 379; *People v Richard H.,*101 AD2d 867).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Repp, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-4239.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. REPP.

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Repp, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-4239.]

(No. 2021-0757—Submitted November 28, 2022—Decided November 29, 2022.)

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.

____________________

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, Judge Mark Edward Repp, Attorney 

Registration No. 0058853, last known business address in Tiffin, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 9, 2021, 

wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from 

the practice of law for a period of one year, finds that respondent has complied with 

that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 

the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).

{¶ 5} For previous case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Repp, 165 Ohio St.3d 

582, 2021-Ohio-3923, 180 N.E.3d 1128.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART,

and BRUNNER, JJ., concur.

_________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      14,809,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,060,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                   411,881
<INVENTORY>                                  1,313,611
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,216,974
<PP&E>                                     221,681,162
<DEPRECIATION>                            (57,976,447)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             215,695,439
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,735,984
<BONDS>                                    206,191,485
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       19,631,397
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,128
<OTHER-SE>                                (37,903,555)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               215,695,439
<SALES>                                     23,558,865
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           194,998,230
<CGS>                                       11,876,566
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              166,080,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               882,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               560,462
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          25,495,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,293,592)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,293,592)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             19,247,928
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (31,541,520)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (8.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.89)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.45





LETTER AGREEMENT



This LETTER AGREEMENT (Agreement) is made between Azco Mining Inc. (AZCO), a company registered in Delaware and Metallica Ventures, LLC(Metallica), a company registered in Wyoming (also a Party or the Parties).



THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSESthat in consideration of the mutual promises and other valuable consideration herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:



1.

In return for consideration that AZCO shall pay or cause to be paid to Metallica, Metallica shall enter into the Assignment and Assumption of Planet Lease Agreement (Assignment Agreement) with AZCO.  The consideration paid to Metallica shall consist of:  A) ten thousand dollars ($10,000); and B) two million (2,000,000) shares of AZCO common stock which shall be issued to W. Pierce Carson and which shall carry piggyback registration rights.



2.

Metallica has made lease payments current to the payment due September 5, 2005.  AZCO shall make lease payments commencing with the payment due October 5, 2005.



3.

AZCO shall pay all outstanding taxes due under the lease.



4.

Time is of the essence in this Agreement.



5.

If any litigation arises between the Parties relating to this Agreement, the losing Party shall pay the prevailing Partys costs and expenses of litigation, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys fees.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed and effective as of the 22nd day of September, 2005.



Azco Mining Inc.

Metallica Ventures, LLC





By:_________________________

By:_________________________



Its:_________________________

Its:_________________________
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

July 17 , 2012

No

. 11

- 3958

MARIO MENDOZA, Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

( D.N.J. D.C. No. 3:11

- cv

- 03540)

Present: AMBRO

, VANASKIE and AL DISERT

, Circuit Judges

.

1. Motion by Appellee to Publish Opinion dated June 28, 2012

.

Respectfully,

Clerk/tyw/tmm

______________________ ___________ORDER________________________________

Appellee’s motion to publish opinion dated June 28, 2012, is hereby GRANTED.

The designation of the op inion as precedential does not alter the judgment previously

entered or the original filing date.

By the Court,

Circuit Judge /s/ Aldisert

Dated: August 1, 2012

tyw/cc: Thomas R. Ashley, Esq.

Mark E. Coyne, Esq.

Norman Gross, Esq.
EXHIBIT21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF PROLIANCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

The following sets forth a list of all the direct andindirect subsidiaries as of December   31,   2005 ofProliance International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the‘‘Company’’), and the State or otherjurisdiction of incorporation or organization of each.

|                                                             |  |                                              |  |  |  |  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--|----------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Name                                                        |  | Jurisdictionof Incorporation or Organization |
| ProlianceInternational de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.              |  | Mexico                                       |
| Radiadores GDI, S.A. de C.V.(a)                             |  | Mexico                                       |
| Ready Aire, Inc.                                            |  | Texas                                        |
| Manufacturera Mexicana de Partes deAutomoviles, S.A.de C.V. |  | Mexico                                       |
| Nederlandse Radiateuren Fabriek B.V.                        |  | TheNetherlands                               |
| Modine National Sales, Ltd.                                 |  | Canada                                       |
|                                                             |

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

|     |                                  |
|-----|----------------------------------|
| (a) | Currentlyan inactive subsidiary. |

----