alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Execute Sports, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September
      30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Periodic Report"), I, Sheryl Gardner, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      the
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;


and





2.
      the
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.














Dated:
      November 15, 2006


/s/
      Sheryl Gardner


Sheryl
      Gardner


Chief
      Financial Officer


And
      Principle Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6633

KIRK L. ANDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr.,

District Judge. (3:15-cv-00466-JAG-RCY)

Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 20, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kirk L. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kirk L. Anderson appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failing to 

comply with a court order. On appeal, we confine our review to 

the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 

34(b). Because Anderson’s informal brief does not challenge the 

basis for the district court’s disposition, Anderson has 

forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams 

v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Walter John McMILLEN and Mark L. Haug, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Scott MATHESON, Governor, David L. Wilkinson, Attorney General, and Fred Schwendiman, Driver License Services, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 19924.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Aug. 28, 1987.

David L. Wilkinson, Stephen Schwendi-man, Bruce Hale, Salt Lake City, for defendants and appellants.

Robert Van Sciver, Edward K. Brass, Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs and respondents.

*961PER CURIAM:

Since this case was briefed to this Court, the Utah Court of Appeals rendered its decision in *Kehl v. Schwendiman,*735 P.2d 413 (Utah App.1987). In both that case and this, the district court had reversed an administrative suspension of a driver’s license as not supported by a residuum of competent legal evidence. In both cases, the Department of Public Safety appealed, contending that the “residuum rule” should not apply to per se drivers’ license revocation hearings or, alternatively, that there was sufficient competent evidence introduced at the hearing to meet the requirement of the “residuum rule.”

The *Kehl*court affirmed the trial court’s ruling that the examiner’s order to suspend Kehl’s driver’s license was not supported by a residuum of legal evidence. The same is true in the case here under review. *See also Harry v. Schwendiman,*740 P.2d 1344 (Utah App.1987); *Williams v. Schwendiman,*740 P.2d 1354 (Utah App.1987).

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1749 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 269
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1749

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the possession or 
 use of cell phones and similar wireless devices by Federal prisoners.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 5, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. Grassley, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Hatch, Mr. 
Whitehouse, and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the following bill; which was 
       read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                            February 2, 2010

                 Reported by Mr. Leahy, with amendments
  [Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the possession or 
 use of cell phones and similar wireless devices by Federal prisoners.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cell Phone Contraband Act of 
<DELETED>2009</DELETED>2010''.

SEC. 2. WIRELESS DEVICES IN PRISON.

    Section <DELETED>1971</DELETED>1791 of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (4), by striking ``or (d)(1)(E)'' 
                and inserting ``, (d)(1)(E), or (d)(1)(F)''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (5), by striking ``(d)(1)(F)'' and 
                inserting ``(d)(1)(G)''; and
            (2) in subsection (d)(1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (E), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraph (F) as 
                subparagraph (G); and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the 
                following:
                    ``(F) a phone or other device used by a user of 
                commercial mobile service (as defined in section 332(d) 
                of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 332(d))) 
                in connection with such service; and''.
                                                       Calendar No. 269

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1749

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the possession or 
 use of cell phones and similar wireless devices by Federal prisoners.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 2, 2010

                        Reported with amendments
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Red Rock Pictures Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  July 20, 2011/s/ Reno RolléReno Rollé,President, Chief Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer and Director
#### Pillar et al., Appellants, *v.*The Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co., Appellee.

(No. 31068

Decided June 18, 1947.)

*Mr. William C. Schuch,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Waite, Schindel £ Bayless, Mr. Philip J. Schneider*and *Mr. Edward L. Douglass, Jr.,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weyganbt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NewPage Holding Corporation and NewPage Corporation (the
Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark A. Suwyn, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Companies.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mark A. Suwyn      
|Mark A. Suwyn          
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 12, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 14179-000, 14194-000]


Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLIV FFP Project 51, LLC; Notice 
Announcing Filing Priority for Preliminary Permit Applications

    On February 22, 2012, the Commission held a drawing to determine 
priority among competing preliminary permit applications with identical 
filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that none of 
the applicants' plans are better adapted than the others to develop, 
conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the 
region at issue, the priority established by this drawing will serve as 
the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order of priority is as 
follows:
    1. Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLIV, Project No. 14179-000.
    2. FFP Project 51, LLC, Project No. 14194-000.

    Dated: February 22, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4799 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward George WHITESELL, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 85SA451.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Dec. 22, 1986.

*986G.F. Sandstrom, Dist. Atty., Charles D. Behrens, Deputy Dist. Atty., Pueblo, for plaintiff-appellant.

William L. Lloyd, Pueblo, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The People appeal the trial court s order dismissing an information filed July 17, 1985, alleging that between January 1, 1982, and May 1, 1982, the defendant, Edward George Whitesell, committed sexual assault on a child, in violation of section 18-3-405(1), 8B C.R.S. (1986). The trial court ruled that the prosecution of this case was barred by section 16-5-401(1), 8 C.R.S. (1978), a statute of limitations containing a three-year period within which to bring charges for this and other felony offenses. The trial court correctly stated that the three-year statute was amended, effective July 1, 1982, to provide a seven-year period within which an information alleging this offense might be filed and that the statute was silent with respect to the effect of this amendment on offenses committed prior to the effective date. The trial court concluded that, with regard to offenses committed prior to July 1, 1982, the amendment did not extend the former three-year period of limitations.

In *People v. Holland,*708 P.2d 119 (Colo.1985), we concluded that on the basis of the language of H.B. 1254, 1985 Colo.Sess. Laws 616, again amending section 16-5-401, effective July 1, 1985, the General Assembly expressed a clear intent that its amendment of this statute of limitations insofar as it affects the offense of sexual assault on a child was intended to apply to all offenses not time-barred as of the effective dates of the amendatory legislation. We reached a similar result in *People v. Midgley,*714 P.2d 902 (Colo.1986). The 1982 amendment effectively extended the period of limitations within which to file this action to seven years. Accordingly, the trial court erred in dismissing the information.

The order of the trial court is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Exhibit 10.1 


STATEMENT OF UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT
 TO ACTION TAKEN IN LIEU OF THE ANNUAL MEETING
 OF THE DIRECTORS OF
Global Environmental Energy Corp (Bahamas)
 A Bahamian Corporation and a U.S. Public Company

	
  
Date:
  	
  
December 29th   2006
  
	
  
Time
  	
  
9:00AM
  
	
  
Place:
  	
  
Telephonically
  




THE UNDERSIGNED, being a majority of the directors of Global Environmental Energy Corp., a Bahamian Company and a U.S. Public Company do hereby take the following actions in the name of and on behalf of the Corporation:


RESOLVED, 


First: Given that Tom Kessler has experienced declining personal health and has also reached retirement age, Global Environmental Energy Corp (Bahamas) accept Tom’s request that he resign forthwith from the positions of Director of Global Environmental Energy Corp (Bahamas) and its subsidiaries Sahara Petroleum Exploration Corp (Bahamas) and Biosphere Development Corp (Bahamas)


Second: That Global Environmental Energy Corp (Bahamas) accepts the nomination and appointment of Ms Ivy Grant to the vacant positions of Officer and Director of Global Environmental Energy Corp (Bahamas) and its subsidiaries Sahara Petroleum Exploration Corp (Bahamas) and Biosphere Development Corp (Bahamas) with immediate effect.


Third: That the Board of Global Environmental Energy Corp (Bahamas) instructs its Chairman Dr CA McCormack to assess what medical assistance Mr. Kessler might need in his retirement.

RESOLVED, that all the acts, actions and things done for, in the name of, and on behalf of the Corporation by its officers and directors since the last annual meeting of the corporation be, and they hereby are, in all respects, approved, ratified and confirmed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Consent as of 29th December 2006.

Dr CA McCormack______________________

Mr. Salim Ghafari______________________

End of Filing
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Cold Spring Capital Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph S.
      Weingarten, President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Dated:
      May 15, 2006




/s/
                Joseph S. WeingartenJoseph
                S. Weingarten
              President
| 1.     | The forgoing Report on Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                             |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |
|   |                                                                                                                                                             |

|   |   /s/ Adam Langley                  |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Adam Langley, Chief Compliance Officer        |   |
|   | Aspen Partners, Ltd.                          |   |
|   | Managing Member of Aspen Diversified Fund LLC |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth Fund III, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Chad C. Braun, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity
as an officer of the General Partner of the company, that, to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

|      |                    |  |       |                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|----- | ------------------ |  | ----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: | November 13,
 2009 |  | By:   | /s/ Chad C.
 Braun                                                                                                                                                                                   
|      |                    |  | Name: | Chad C.
 Braun                                                                                                                                                                                       
|      |                    |  | Title | Executive
 Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of AmREIT
 Monthly Income & Growth III Corporation, the General Partner of AmREIT
 Monthly Income & Growth Fund III, Ltd.

---
Exhibit 11
 PROFESSIONAL VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD.
 Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings
  July 31,
    
    July 31,
    
    July 31,
    
    July 31,
    
    July 31,2005
    
    2006
    
    2007
    
    2008
    
    2009Numerator:Net income
    
    $
    2,536
    
    
    $
    2,392
    
    
    $
    2,384
    
    
    $
    1,428
    
    
    $
    (4,373
    )Denominator:Weighted
average
common shares
outstanding
    
    
    1,254
    
    
    
    1,409
    
    
    
    2,039
    
    
    
    2,046
    
    
    
    1,986Earnings per common share
    
    $
    2,022.61
    
    
    $
    1,697.62
    
    
    $
    1,169.27
    
    
    $
    697.92
    
    
    $
    (2,201.91
    )
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*JAMES DUKE

*Wesley W. Horton, Louis W. Flynn, Jr.,*and *Peter B. Prestley,*in support of the petition.

*Toni Smith-Rosario,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 17, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 71 (AC 17541), is denied.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Heavy-Duty Hybrid Onboard Diagnostics

FROM: Amy Kopin

TO: The Docket

DATE: July 15, 2011

On June 6th, 2011 we held a conference call with the California Air Resources Board 

(CARB) to discuss concerns raised by hybrid manufacturers, engine manufacturers, and related 

industry trade groups regarding heavy-duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. 

Concerns were raised during the comment period for the heavy-duty greenhouse gas notice of 

proposed rulemaking that heavy-duty hybrid applications may not be able to meet the 2013 

heavy-duty OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking.

1,2

 

Attendees from the EPA and CARB are shown in the table below.

Attendee Affiliation 

Cleophas Jackson EPA – Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division 

Anthony Neam EPA – Assessment and Standards Division 

Amy Kopin EPA – Assessment and Standards Division 

Annette Hebert CARB

Michael McCarthy CARB

Michael Regenfuss CARB

 

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: 

http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-29/html/2010-32726.htm

2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule 

Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy-Duty Engines Used in Highway 

Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy-Duty 

Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd-obd-frm-02-24-09-notice-74-fr-8310.pdf

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
<PAGE>

           Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Statement of Additional Information
and the incorporation by reference therein and to the use of our report dated
February 27, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of IDS
Life Insurance Company (name subsequently changed to RiverSource Life
Insurance Company) and to the use of our report dated March 31, 2006 with
respect to the financial statements of American Enterprise Variable Annuity
Account (name subsequently changed to RiverSource Variable Annuity Account) in
the Initial Registration Statement on Form N-4 for the registration of the
Wells Fargo Advantage(R) Builder Variable Annuity offered by RiverSource Life
Insurance Company.

                                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                               ------------------------------
                                                   Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 2, 2007