alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Johannes T. Petersen, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Director of Century Petroleum Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Century Petroleum
Corp. for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Century Petroleum Corp.

Dated: June 9, 2008

/s/ Johnannes T. PetersenJohannes T.
PetersenChief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director (Principal
Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Century
Petroleum Corp. and will be retained by Century Petroleum Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 27, 2013

N o. 04

- 13

- 00650

- CR

John CANALES

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR8914 Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Defendant pled nolo contendre to possession of a controlled substance PG 1 less than 1

gram and was sentenced within the terms of a plea bargain

. The trial court imposed or suspended sentence on July 26, 2013 . Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed August 26, 2013 . Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on September 9, 2013 . Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Appellant filed notice of appeal on September 23, 2013 . Appellant did not file a motion

for extension of time.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing no later than October 10, 2013 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

We also note t he trial court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal states this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and “defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain and a written waiver of appeal, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by defendant; therefore, the trial

court’s certification accurately reflects that defendant’s case is a plea bargain case and defendant does not have a right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2).“In a plea bargain case .

. . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written moti on filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court's permission to appeal.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record does not contain a written motion ruled on before trial nor does it indicate the trial court granted defendan t permission to appeal. This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made a part of the record.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d).

If appellant demonstrates this court has jurisdiction no la ter than October 10, 2013 , i t is

nevertheless ORDERED this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification that shows defendant has the right of appeal has been made part of the ap pellate record by October 30 , 201 3

. See Daniels v. State

, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); 37.1.

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification

issue.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of September, 2013

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 16 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to remove the temporary 

suspension of waiver authority for participation in the Visa Waiver Program and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. VOINOVICH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to remove 

the temporary suspension of waiver authority for participation in the Visa Waiver Program and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Visa Waiver Program 

5 Expansion Act of 2010’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 16 IS

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF WAIVER 

2 AUTHORITY FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE 

3 VISA WAIVER PROGRAM. 

4 Section 217(c)(8)(A) of the Immigration and Nation5 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(c)(8)(A)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking clause (iii); and 

7 (2) by redesignating clause (iv) as clause (iii). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
250 Airside Drive

Moon Township, PA 15108

Tel. 412-809-6000

water.info@veoliawater.com

www.vwsoilandgas.com
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Michael Jordan Friedman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Fresh Harvest Products, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Michael Jordan Friedman  _________________________________________ Michael Jordan Friedman, Chief Executive Officer   Date: signed on January 22, 2007 as of March 17, 2006
#### The Brown-Brockmeyer Co., Appellant, *v.*Roach et al., Appellees.

(No. 30998

Decided May 7, 1947.)

*Mr. A. K. Meek,*for appellant.

*Mr. Hugh S. Jenkins,*attorney general, and *Mr. John M. Woy,*for appellee Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. „

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of *126right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Wbygandt, C. J., Turnee, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
May 10, 2010 

N3615 (2350) 

Terry L. O’Clair, P.E., Director 

Division of Air Quality 

North Dakota Department of Health 

Environmental Health Section 

918 E. Divide Ave., 2nd Floor 

Bismarck, North Dakota 58501-1947 

Dear Mr. O’Clair: 

As requested in your recent Public Notice, the National Park Service (NPS) is submitting 

the enclosed comments regarding the proposed Best Available Control Technology 

(BACT) determinations for the Milton R. Young Station (MRYS) near Center, North 

Dakota. MRYS is located within 300 km of two Class I areas, Lostwood National 

Wildlife Refuge administered by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and Theodore 

Roosevelt National Park administered by the NPS. Our comments include appendices 

regarding baseline emissions and costs of adding Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) at 

MRYS. We conclude that SCR is technically and economically feasible at MRYS and 

should be determined to be BACT for that facility, thereby minimizing the impacts of 

MEYS at these Class I areas. 

We look forward to working with the North Dakota Department of Health and with EPA 

as this process advances. We believe that good communication and sharing of 

information will help expedite this process, and suggest that you contact Don Shepherd of 

my staff (don_shepherd@nps.gov, 303-969-2075) if you have any questions or 

comments. 

Sincerely, 

John Bunyak 

Chief, Policy, Planning and Permit Review Branch 

Enclosures 
2 

cc: 

Callie Videtich 

Air Technical Assistance Unit (8P-AR) 

U.S. EPA Region V-III 

999 18th St., Suite 300 

Denver, Colorado 80202-2466 

bcc: 

WASO: Julie McNamee 

MWR: David Pohlman 

THRO: Supt. 

AQB-DEN: Tim Allen 

ARD-DEN: Chris Shaver, Permit Review Group, Reading and Project File 

ARD-DEN:DShepherd:ds:5/10/10:x2075:MR Young Station BACT.Ltr.doc
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Vincent Verdiramo, President of Serino 2, Corp. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  December 14, 2005

/s/ Vincent L. Verdiramo

___________________________



President
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS I, James C. Hunt, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Venturi Partners,
Inc. (the registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: March 24, 2004
    
    /s/ James C. HuntJames C. Hunt
 63
#### STATE of Oklahoma, Appellant, v. Charles Earl WOODWARD and Gerald Edward Wyche, Appellees.

No. J-87-158.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Nov. 6, 1987.

NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER CLARIFYING OPINION

On November 6,1987, oral argument in a matter of habeas corpus was heard by this Court in the petition of *Charles Earl Woodward v. State of Oklahoma, ex rel; The Honorable David Harris, Associate District Judge within and for Adair County, State of Oklahoma,*No. H-87-836. During the hearing it was made clear that the interpretation of this Court’s opinion in *State v. Woodward,*737 P.2d 569 (Okl.Cr.1987), was not that intended by this Court when the opinion was filed.

NOW THEREFORE, this Court finds that this *Nunc Pro Tunc*order becomes necessary in order to rectify any misunderstanding of the intention of this Court concerning the aforementioned opinion.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that the words in the last paragraph on page 571, 737 P.2d, as follows, shall be stricken: “and the appellees herein shall stand trial as charged.” The last paragraph of the opinion shall read as follows:

> We are therefore of the opinion that the judgment and sentence of the Honorable District Judge of the Adair County District Court certifying appellees to the juvenile division of the court is erroneous and is therefore REVERSED. It is the order of this Court that the order of the Adair County District Court in CRF-86-94 certifying appellees to the juvenile division shall be vacated and set aside.

The Honorable District Court shall proceed with the matter of CRF-86-94 from the point of vacating the order certifying the juveniles to the juvenile division of the district court. This matter is therefore remanded to the District Court of Adair County, Oklahoma, for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion, as corrected.

(s)BRETT, Presiding Judge

(s)PARKS, Judge.
II 

Calendar No. 178 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1776 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for the update 

under the Medicare physician fee schedule for years beginning with 

2010 and to sunset the application of the sustainable growth rate formula, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 13, 2009 

Ms. STABENOW introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

OCTOBER 14, 2009 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for the update under the Medicare physician fee schedule 

for years beginning with 2010 and to sunset the application of the sustainable growth rate formula, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Physician 

5 Fairness Act of 2009’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1776 PCS

1 SEC. 2. MEDICARE PHYSICIAN FEE SCHEDULE UPDATE FOR 

2 YEARS BEGINNING WITH 2010. 

3 (a) UPDATE.—Section 1848(d) of the Social Security 

4 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–4(d)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(10) UPDATE FOR 2010 AND SUBSEQUENT

7 YEARS.—The update to the single conversion factor 

8 established in paragraph (1)(C) for 2010 and each 

9 subsequent year shall be 0 percent.’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING SUNSET OF SUSTAINABLE

11 GROWTH RATE.—Section 1848(f)(1)(B) of the Social Se12 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–4(f)(1)(B)) is amended by 

13 inserting ‘‘(ending with 2008)’’ after ‘‘each succeeding 

14 year’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 178 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1776 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to 

growth rate formula, and for other purposes. and to sunset the application of the sustainable cian fee schedule for years beginning with 2010 provide for the update under the Medicare physiOCTOBER 14, 2009 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
| 1.     | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A of Aspen Diversified Fund LLC;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| 3.     | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.                        |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |

|   |   /s/ Jeremy L. Standrod            |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Jeremy L. Standrod, Managing Partner          |   |
|   | Aspen Partners, Ltd.                          |   |
|   | Managing Member of Aspen Diversified Fund LLC |   |

----
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
M ISAEL C ARB A JAL M EJIA, AKA M isa e l B onilla

Silva , Pe titione r,
v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 13-73829 Age n c y No. A078-062-194
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 12, 2016 * * Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : FAR

R IS, C LIFTON, a

nd B EA, C irc uit Judge s. M isa e l C arba

ja l M e jia , a native and c itiz e n of Hondura s, pe titions pro se for
re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing his a p pe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c i sion de ny i ng his a pplic at ion for withholding of re m ova l 

# F IL ED F EB 19 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).and prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Aga inst Torture (“ C AT” ). W e have

jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e v ide nc e the
a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings. Silay a v . Muk ase y , 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th C ir. 2008). B e fore the a g e nc y , C arba

ja l M e jia c la im e d he wa s pe rse c ute d a n d fe ars pe rse c ution on a c c ount of his politic a l opinion a nd m e m be rship in a

pa rtic ula r soc i a l group of Na

tiona l Party

m e m be rs. Substa

ntia l e vide nc e supports the
a ge nc y ’ s c onc lusion tha

t C arba ja l M e jia did not e s ta

blish a ne xus to a

prote c te d ground ba se d on the proble m s he e xpe rie nc e d a fte r witne ssing thekilling of a
m ay ora l c andida

t e . Se e Parussimov

a v . Muk ase y , 555 F.3d 734, 740-42 (9th C ir. 2009) (the REAL ID Ac t

“ re quire s tha

t a prote c te d ground repre s e nt ‘ o ne c e ntra l
re a s on’ for an a sy lum

a pplic a nt’ s pe rse c ution” ; re c o rd did not c om pe l finding of
ne xus). Thus, C a

rba ja l M e jia ’ s withholding of re

m ova l c l a im

fa i ls. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e a lso supports the a ge nc y ’ s de nia l of C AT re lie f be c a u se C arba ja l M e jia fa ile d to e sta

blish it is m

ore like ly tha

n not he would betorture d at the i nstiga

tion of or with the a c quie sc e nc e of the gove rnm e n t if re turne d to Hondura s. Se e S

ilay a , 524 F.3d a

t 1073. Fina lly , a c c ording to the

gove rnm e nt, C arba

ja l M e jia wa s re m ove d from

the Unite d State s on M arc h 11, 2014. Thus, his c ha lle nge s a s to his de t e ntion a nd the de nia l of a

bond he aring a

re m oot. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.