T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E R W IN H E R R E R A , a. k. a. Jose M anuel C a s t i l l o, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 74543 A ge nc yN o. A 078- 039- 482 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 20, 2011 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E rw i n H e rr e r a , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of H ondur a s , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s dec i si on denyi ng hi s app l i ca t i on for w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve 

# FI LED MA Y03 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 74543 2 ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e , G o n za lezH e rn a n dezv . A s h c r o

ft , 336 F . 3d 995, 998 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , a nd w e de nythe p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. S ub st ant i al evi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s f i nd i ng that , even i f H erre ra es t abl i shed pastpers ec ut i on by the G on za l ez fam i l y on acc ou ntof a prot ec t ed grou nd , any pre sum pt i on of a c l ear probabi l i ty of f uture pers ec ut i on w as re bu tt ed b ye v id e n c e th a t h e c o u ldr e a s o n ab lyr e lo c a te w ith in H o n d u r a s . See 8 C. F. R. § 1 2 0 8 .1 6 ( b ) ( 1 ) ( i) ( B ) ; G on zalez -H erna ndez , 3 3 6 F .3 dat 9 9 8 -9 9 . H erre ra ’s cont ent i on thatthe agency app l i ed the w rong st andard w hen d et erm i ni ng i tw as r e a s onabl e f

orhi m t o r e l oc a t e i s be l i e d bythe r e c or d. S ub st ant i al evi dence al so supp ort s the agency’ s det erm i nat i on thatH erre ra fa i l ed t o est abl i sh hi s uncl e’ s threa t s r egar di ng H erre ra ’ s c on t i nu ed fi nanci al s u p p o rt o f

h is g r a n d m o th e rw e r e o n a c c o u n t o f ap r o te c te dg r o u n d . Se e B ol s hakov v . I NS , 1 3 3 F . 3 d 1 2 7 9 , 1 2 8 0 -8 1 (9 th C i r. 1 9 9 8 ) (cri m i n al act i v i ty d o es n o test ab l i sh p e r s e c u tio n o n a c c o u n t o f ap r o te c te dg r o u n d ) ; se e al so P arussi m ova v. Mukasey , 55 5 F . 3d 73 4, 74 0 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( “ [t ] he R E A L ID A ctre qu i re s thata prot ec t ed grou nd re pres ent‘ on e c entra l re as on ’ for an asy l um appl i cant ’ s per se cut i on ”) . A c c o r d in g ly , H e rr e r a ’s w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im f

a ils .08- 74543 3 He rr e r ah a s n o tr a i s e d a n yd i r e c tc h a l l e n g e t o th e a g e n c y ’ s d e n i a l o f C AT r e lie f . Se e M a r t i n ez - Se rr a n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1259- 60 ( 9th C i r . 1996) (s t at i ng thati ss ues notsupp ort ed by ar gu m entar e dee m ed abando ned). F in a lly , w e d e n yH e rr e r a ’s r e q u e s t f o rar e m a n db e c au s e th e B I A s u f f ic ie n tly a rtic u la te d th e r e a s o n s f o rits d e c is io n . See T

ekle v . Mukasey , 533 F . 3d 1044, 1051 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.