alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

MAR 1 9 2015 

Ms. Cathy Scheu 

Managing Director Policies Training and Administration 

American Airlines, Inc. 

4255 Amon Carter Blvd., MD 4290 

Fort Worth, TX 76155 

Ms. Scheu: 

800 Independence Ave, SW 

Washington DC 20591 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is in receipt of a petition for exemption from 

American Airlines (http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetaii;D=F AA-20 15-0409) 

requesting relief from Title 14 Code ofF ederal Regulations ( 14 CFR) section 121.311 (b) to 

the extent required for infants/children traveling on American Airlines to be able to use an 

FAA-approved Child Restraint System (CRS) in certain obliquely-oriented seats 

(not forward facing, as required by 14 CFR section 121.311) in the premium cabin on 

Boeing 777 and Boeing 787 aircraft during all phases of flight. 

The FAA is in the process of conducting a technical analysis of your petition for exemption. 

We understand that the FAA has already made an Equivalent Level of Safety finding to 

14 CFR sections 25.562 and 25.785 relative to the ZSUS 2938 model obliquely-oriented 

Business Class Passenger Seats on the American Airlines fleet, to address the classification 

of the seat model design as forward and aft facing. However, this determination did not 

specifically consider the use of CRS in those seats. 

Therefore, as part of our technical analysis of your petition for exemption, the FAA has 

determined that it is necessary for you to provide dynamic testing data (generated under the 

conditions prescribed in 14 CFR section 25.562) regarding the efficacy of FAA-approved 

CRS in these obliquely-oriented passenger seats (that may result in up to a maximum angle 

of28 degrees to the aircraft centerline for the seat occupant). This data is necessary to 

demonstrate that, if your petition for exemption is granted, American Airlines' proposal would result in an equivalent level of safety to 14 CFR section 121.311 (b) regarding the 

requirement that the CRS be properly secured to an approved forward-facing seat or berth. 

If you have any questions, please contact Nancy Claussen, Aviation Safety Inspector, 

Policy Integration Branch, AfS-270 at (202) 267-9991 . 

Sincerely,
Exhibit 10 (a) 



CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 



We consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Amendment No. 20 to Registration Statement (Investment Company Act File
No. 811-21162) on Form N-1A of our report dated October 19, 2006, relating to the
financial statements and financial highlights of BlackRock Fundamental Growth Principal
Protected Fund (the “Fund”) of BlackRock Principal Protected Trust appearing in
the Annual Report on Form N-CSR of the Fund for the year ended August 31, 2006, and to
the reference to us under the heading “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm” in part B of such Registration Statement. 





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 



Princeton, New Jersey

  December 26,
2006
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1358 Referred in House (RFH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1358

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2009

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark 
Office to use funds made available under the Trademark Act of 1946 for 
 patent operations in order to avoid furloughs and reductions-in-force.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OF PTO DIRECTOR TO USE TRADEMARK FUND.

    (a) Authority.--The Director of the United States Patent and 
Trademark Office may use funds made available under section 31 of the 
Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1113) to support the processing of 
patents and other activities, services, and materials relating to 
patents, notwithstanding section 42(c) of title 35, United States Code, 
if--
            (1) the Director certifies to Congress that the use of such 
        funds is reasonably necessary to avoid furloughs or a 
        reduction-in-force in the Patent and Trademark Office, or both; 
        and
            (2) funds so used are repaid to trademark operations not 
        later than September 30, 2011.
    (b) Expiration of Authority.--The authority under subsection (a) 
shall terminate on June 30, 2010.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Director.--The terms ``Director of the United States 
        Patent and Trademark Office'' and ``Director'' mean the Under 
        Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of 
        the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
            (2) Trademark act of 1946.--The term ``Trademark Act of 
        1946'' means the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the 
        registration and protection of trademarks used in commerce, to 
        carry out the provisions of certain international conventions, 
        and for other purposes'', approved July 5, 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1051 
        et seq.).

            Passed the Senate June 25, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P.(the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Daniel C. Sibley, Chief Financial Officer of Reef Oil & Gas Partners,L.P., the managing general partner of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P., certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                 The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m OR 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                 The information contained in the Reporton Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
| Date: November 19, 2007 | /s/ Daniel C. Sibley              |   |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Daniel C. Sibley                  |   |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer           |   |
|                    | Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P. |   |

 

 

This certification is not deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwisesubject to the liability of that section. This certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference in anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it byreference.

 

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fresh Harvest Products, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2008 (the Report), the undersigned, Michael Jordan Friedman, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Michael Jordan Friedman





_________________________________________

Michael Jordan Friedman, Chief Executive Officer

And Chief Financial Officer



Date: February 25, 2009
10-Q Exhibit 32.1: Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iShares® Silver Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee T. Kranefuss, Chief Executive Officer of Barclays Global Investors International Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 6, 2009                                                                          
|                                                                                                
|/s/    Lee T.
Kranefuss Lee T. Kranefuss * Chief Executive Officer (Principal executive officer)





|* | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Kranefuss is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors International Inc., the Sponsor of the
Registrant.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1829 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic snow globes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21, 2009 

Mr. BAUCUS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic snow 

globes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACRYLIC SNOW GLOBES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic snow globes, not festive (provided for in subheading 3926.40.00) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1829 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statements on Form  S-8 (Nos. 33-80871,
33-98148 and 33-98150) of Transpro, Inc. of our report dated March 17,
2004 relating to the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash
flows, and changes in stockholders' equity for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the financial statement schedule for the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 , which appears in this Form
10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Hartford, CT

March 28,
2005

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Miguel Ayala, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Carey, J.), rendered March 8, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On February 20, 1989, two police officers, responding to a report of a man with a gun, arrived at 13 Cottage Place Gardens in Westchester. There, they saw the defendant run past a woman who was pointing at the defendant and screaming, "He’s got a gun”. When the defendant failed to respond when the police officers both shouted at him to stop, the officers chased him. The defendant was caught by the officers and became violent, knocking one of the officers to the ground and injuring him. The defendant was eventually detained by the officers, and a pat-down search revealed a loaded revolver in his jacket pocket.

We find that under these circumstances, the officers acted reasonably in stopping the defendant and performing the pat-down search *(see,*CPL 140.50; *People v Salaman,*71 NY2d 869; *People v Benjamin,*51 NY2d 267; *People v Brown,*127 AD2d 674). Further, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, *718upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 23.3




Report of Independent Public Accountants

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Personnel Group of America, Inc.


      We have audited the consolidated statements of income, shareholders'
equity and cash flows of Personnel Group of America, Inc. and subsidiaries (a
Delaware corporation) for the year ended December 29, 1996. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

      We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the results of the operations and the
cash flows of Personnel Group of America, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year
ended December 29, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.



/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina,
  February 7, 1997, except for Note 4, for which 
  the date is December 26, 1997 and except for 
  Note 10, for which the date is March 5, 1998.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Jennings, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fisher, J.), rendered March 8, 1988, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to the police.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court did not err in refusing to suppress the defendant’s statement to the police. Notwithstanding the defendant’s testimony to the contrary, the police testimony at the pretrial hearing established that the defendant’s statement was spontaneous *(see, People v Stoesser, 53*NY2d 648, 650; *People v Grimaldi,*52 NY2d 611, 617; Richardson, Evidence, 1972-1985 Cumulative Supplement § 545 [a] [Prince 10th ed]). Keeping in mind that much weight is to be accorded the determination of the hearing court and that its findings are not to be set aside unless they are clearly erroneous *(see, People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759; *People v Moore,*161 AD2d 733), we cannot conclude from this record that the hearing court erred in crediting the police testimony over that of the defendant *(see, People v Moore, supra).*

The trial court properly admitted into evidence two bullets *734which were found at the scene of the crime several months after it was committed. The bullets were sufficiently connected to the defendant to render them admissible *(see, People v McGee,*49 NY2d 48, 59, *cert denied sub nom. Waters v New York,*446 US 942; *People v Mirenda,*23 NY2d 439, 453; *People v Price,*128 AD2d 648). Furthermore, the fact that several months had elapsed between the commission of the crime and the recovery of the bullets goes to the weight or probative force of the evidence and not its admissibility *(see, People v Martinez,*115 AD2d 665).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ,, concur.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

> 
(1) I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.

 

 By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation      General Partner

 

/S/ Brenda G. Gujral                          

Name: Brenda G. Gujral
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Vincent Verdiramo, President of Serino 1, Corp. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  September 14, 2005

/s/ Vincent L. Verdiramo

___________________________



President
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4933]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Mental Health Services in Non-Specialty Settings 
Conflicts.
    Date: March 8, 2012.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Aileen Schulte, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 
6140, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-1225, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bedfcdddd6cbd2cadbfed3dfd7d290d0d7d690d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7110021219041d0514311c10181d5f1f18195f161e07">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 22, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-4933 Filed 2-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>