Name: Shawn Jennings

Title: E H & S Specialist

Company: Edison Mission

Sign Date: 9/9/2010

Name: Thomas F. Mattei

Title: Quality Assurance Manager / Techni

Company: Avogadro Environmental Corp.

Sign Date: 9/8/2010

Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date

American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

Final Test Report 

for

/ /

Based on information and belief formed 

after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the 

statements and information in this test 

report are true, accurate, and complete.

I have reviewed all testing details and 

results in this test report and hereby 

certify that the test report is authentic 

and accurate.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 1 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Facility Information:

American Bituminous Power Partners, LP

228 ABPP Drive

P O Box 159

GRANT TOWN W 26574

Contact: Shawn Jennings

Phone: 304-278-6103

Fax: 304-278-7437

Email: SJennings@edisonmission.com

Testing Company:

Avogadro Environmental Corporation

1350 Sullivan Trail

Suite A

Easton PA 18040

Contact:Thomas Mattei

Phone: 610-559-8776 x 103

Fax: 610-559-8913

Email: tmattei@avogadro.net

Air Permit Number:

R30-04900026-2009

Permitted Source ID/Name:

10151 Grant Town Power Plant

Permitted Maximum Process Rate:

675 MMBtu/hr

Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:

675 MMBtu/hr

Target Process Test Rate

606 MMBtu/hr

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or

 process flow diagram:

American Bituminous operates a coal refuse fired power plant in Grant Town, West Virginia referred to as the Grant 

Town Station. 

The Grant Town Station generates electricity with the steam supplied from two circulating fluidized bed combustion 

(CFB) boilers with a maximum rating of 551.9 MMBtu/hr each. The primary fuel is coal refuse supplemented with 

pond fines. Natural gas is used as a startup fuel. 

Limestone is injected directly into the furnace combustor for control of sulfur dioxide emissions. High fluidization 

velocities promote circulation of solids which provides more efficient combustion, emissions control, and heat 

transfer. Employing limestone as the sorbent material in the fluidized bed removes sulfur dioxide (SO2) at an 

efficiency of 90 to 94.8%. The addition of limestone to the coal refuse at the combustion chamber is integral to the 

design and operation of the CFB boilers. Once the sulfurization process has occurred, the remaining calcium sulfate 

is removed from the boiler in the bottom ash and fly ash streams.

Gases and particulate matter (PM) produced from combustion then move through a hot cyclone where heavy particles 

and ash are separated from the fine particulate hot exhaust gas. The hot exhaust gases then pass through a baghouse 

for capture of fine particulates. Both boiler units discharge through a common stack.

The CFB boiler technology produces lower levels of nitrogen oxides (NOx) than other combustion technologies. The 

CFB boilers operate at a relatively low temperature in the combustion zone producing less thermal NOx.

Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

AFS #: 5404900026 FRS #: 110007881998

SCC / Description 10102018 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Waste Coal - Circulating 

Fluidized Bed Combustion 

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 2 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Test Parameter Information:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width

Stack Exit 139.5 0 0 0 279 1908 3 12

Target

Parameter 

Test

Method

Number of

Test Runs

Test Run

Duration

Sample 

Location Points Comments

Stack Exit % H2O Method 1 - 4 3 0

Carbon Monoxide Method 10 3 127 0 runs range from 127 to 

137 minutes

Stack Exit

Total organic compounds 

(TOC) as Propane

Method 25A 3 127 0 runs range from 127 to 

137 minutes

Stack Exit

Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 60 0 The samples were 

collected in a 

combined train with 

HCN using NaOH

impingers only.

Chlorine data for 

Method 26A analysis 

is not available from 

the laboratory.

Method 26A & CTM033

The MDLs are 

determined by the 

analysis of at least 

seven replicate 

standards at a 

concentration near the 

expected MDL. To 

determine the MDL 

value, the standard 

deviation of the 

replicate analyses is 

calculated and that 

number is multiplied 

by the Student t factor 

that corresponds to the 

number of replicates 

analyzed. The MDL 

value should meet the 

criteria stated in the 

CFR Title 40, Part 136 

B.

If the MDL 

determined does not 

meet these criteria, a 

default MDL value 

will be used which is 

1/10 of the 

concentration of the 

standard used to 

produce the MDL 

value.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 3 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 60 0 The samples were 

collected in a 

combined train with 

HCN using NaOH

impingers only.

Chlorine data for 

Method 26A analysis 

is not available from 

the laboratory.

Method 26A & CTM033

The MDLs are 

determined by the 

analysis of at least 

seven replicate 

standards at a 

concentration near the 

expected MDL. To 

determine the MDL 

value, the standard 

deviation of the 

replicate analyses is 

calculated and that 

number is multiplied 

by the Student t factor 

that corresponds to the 

number of replicates 

analyzed. The MDL 

value should meet the 

criteria stated in the 

CFR Title 40, Part 136 

B.

If the MDL 

determined does not 

meet these criteria, a 

default MDL value 

will be used which is 

1/10 of the 

concentration of the 

standard used to 

produce the MDL 

value.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 4 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Filterable PM2.5 OTM - 27/28 3 300 0 Back half particulate 

matter (OTM-028) 

mass was calculated 

using the maximum 

allowable blank 

correction value of 

0.002 g. A correction 

value of 0.001 g was 

used for each fraction 

(organic and 

inorganic) for a total 

correction of 0.002 g. 

Method OTM-028

A portion of reagent 

water that has been 

spiked with a known 

amount of material is 

extracted 3 times with 

Methylene Chloride. 

The solvent is 

evaporated to dryness. 

Detection Limits are 

calculated by using the 

standard deviation 

from these 10 replicate 

low level spikes. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit. The 

non-extractable 

portion is determined 

by the weight 

difference on a series 

of 10 vials. Detection 

Limits are calculated 

by using the standard 

deviation from these 

10 replicates. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit.

runs range from 300 

to 345.25 minutes

Stack Exit

Filterable Particulate OTM - 27/28 3 300 0 Cyclone head not 

recovered.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 5 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Inorganic (Aqueous) 

Condensible Part.

OTM - 27/28 3 300 0 Back half particulate 

matter (OTM-028) 

mass was calculated 

using the maximum 

allowable blank 

correction value of 

0.002 g. A correction 

value of 0.001 g was 

used for each fraction 

(organic and 

inorganic) for a total 

correction of 0.002 g. 

Method OTM-028

A portion of reagent 

water that has been 

spiked with a known 

amount of material is 

extracted 3 times with 

Methylene Chloride. 

The solvent is 

evaporated to dryness. 

Detection Limits are 

calculated by using the 

standard deviation 

from these 10 replicate 

low level spikes. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit. The 

non-extractable 

portion is determined 

by the weight 

difference on a series 

of 10 vials. Detection 

Limits are calculated 

by using the standard 

deviation from these 

10 replicates. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit.

runs range from 300 

to 345.25 minutes

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 6 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Organic Condensible 

Particulate

OTM - 27/28 3 300 0 Back half particulate 

matter (OTM-028) 

mass was calculated 

using the maximum 

allowable blank 

correction value of 

0.002 g. A correction 

value of 0.001 g was 

used for each fraction 

(organic and 

inorganic) for a total 

correction of 0.002 g. 

Method OTM-028

A portion of reagent 

water that has been 

spiked with a known 

amount of material is 

extracted 3 times with 

Methylene Chloride. 

The solvent is 

evaporated to dryness. 

Detection Limits are 

calculated by using the 

standard deviation 

from these 10 replicate 

low level spikes. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit. The 

non-extractable 

portion is determined 

by the weight 

difference on a series 

of 10 vials. Detection 

Limits are calculated 

by using the standard 

deviation from these 

10 replicates. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit.

runs range from 300 

to 345.25 minutes

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 7 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Total PM2.5 OTM - 27/28 3 300 0 Back half particulate 

matter (OTM-028) 

mass was calculated 

using the maximum 

allowable blank 

correction value of 

0.002 g. A correction 

value of 0.001 g was 

used for each fraction 

(organic and 

inorganic) for a total 

correction of 0.002 g. 

Method OTM-028

A portion of reagent 

water that has been 

spiked with a known 

amount of material is 

extracted 3 times with 

Methylene Chloride. 

The solvent is 

evaporated to dryness. 

Detection Limits are 

calculated by using the 

standard deviation 

from these 10 replicate 

low level spikes. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit. The 

non-extractable 

portion is determined 

by the weight 

difference on a series 

of 10 vials. Detection 

Limits are calculated 

by using the standard 

deviation from these 

10 replicates. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit.

runs range from 300 

to 345.25 minutes

Stack Exit

Total Particulate OTM - 27/28 3 300 0 Cyclone head not 

recovered.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 8 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Cobalt Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 9 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Selenium Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 10 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Nickel Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 11 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Manganese Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 12 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Lead Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 13 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Chromium Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 14 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Cadmium Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 15 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Beryllium Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 16 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Arsenic Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 17 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Antimony Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 18 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

See attached QAPP for more information.

Filterable Particulate Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Stack Exit O2 Method 3A O2 3 0

Stack Exit Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 0

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 19 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location Stack Exit - Method 10

Average

Run Number M10-1 M10-2 M10-3

Test Date 6/8/2010 6/10/2010 6/10/2010

Run Start Time 1:27:00 PM 11:33:00 

AM

2:03:00 PM

Run Finish Time 3:44:00 PM 1:44:00 PM 4:10:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 11.8 11.7 11.7 11.733

Oxygen, % 8 8.1 8.1 8.067

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 312044 321091 320163 317,766.000

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Moisture, % 7.78 8.39 8.11 8.093

Fuel Type Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Location Stack Exit - Method 25A

Average

Run Number M25A-1 M25A-2 M25A-3

Test Date 6/8/2010 6/10/2010 6/10/2010

Run Start Time 1:27:00 PM 11:33:00 

AM

2:03:00 PM

Run Finish Time 3:44:00 PM 1:44:00 PM 4:10:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 11.8 11.7 11.7 11.733

Oxygen, % 8 8.1 8.1 8.067

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 312044 321091 320163 317,766.000

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Moisture, % 7.78 8.39 8.11 8.093

Fuel Type Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 20 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 26A

Average

Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Test Date 6/8/2010 6/9/2010 6/10/2010

Run Start Time 3:17:00 PM 3:54:00 PM 1:07:00 PM

Run Finish Time 4:29:00 PM 5:07:00 PM 2:25:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 35.635 35.716 37.510 36.287

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 6.43 10.97 5.40 7.600

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000

Carbon Dioxide, % 11.6 11.5 11.7 11.600

Oxygen, % 8.1 8.3 8.1 8.167

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 380.46 368.77 381.85 377.027

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 313,846.8 296,855.9 313,924.0 308,208.900

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 556,019.8 550,606.7 554,873.5 553,833.333

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 96.8 102.6 101.9 100.433

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Location Stack Exit - Method 29

Average

Run Number M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Test Date 6/8/2010 6/9/2010 6/10/2010

Run Start Time 8:25:00 AM 9:54:00 

AM

6:54:00 AM

Run Finish Time 12:38:00 PM 3:36:00 PM 11:07:00 AM

Net Run Time, minutes 240 240 240

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 134.676 133.775 134.305 134.252

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 7.77 8.88 8.85 8.500

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000

Carbon Dioxide, % 11.7 11.7 11.8 11.733

Oxygen, % 8.2 8.2 8.1 8.167

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 377.71 368.84 372.35 372.967

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 309,729.1 305,310.0 302,240.9 305,760.000

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 554,682.4 553,345.1 548,186.7 552,071.400

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.8 100.5 101.9 100.733

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 21 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Location Stack Exit - OTM - 27/28

Average

Run Number OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3

Test Date 6/8/2010 6/9/2010 6/10/2010

Run Start Time 8:25:00 AM 9:54:00 

AM

6:54:00 AM

Run Finish Time 2:20:00 PM 4:38:00 PM 12:35:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 345.75 300 332.25

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 129.192 106.276 118.935 118.134

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 6.82 8.51 8.30 7.877

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000

Carbon Dioxide, % 11.8 11.6 11.8 11.733

Oxygen, % 8.1 8.2 8.1 8.133

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 376.77 366.85 372.62 372.080

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 315,285.1 309,406.6 306,720.4 310,470.700

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 558,248.7 557,357.1 553,154.0 556,253.267

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 85.7 99.0 100.9 95.200

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 22 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Emissions Summary

Location: Stack Exit - Method 10

Compound: Carbon Monoxide

Average

Run M10-1 M10-2 M10-3

lb/mmBtuO2 2.48E-02 2.71E-02 2.60E-02 0.026

ppm 2.16E+01 2.34E+01 2.24E+01 22.467

ppm@7%O2 2.33E+01 2.54E+01 2.43E+01 24.333

Location: Stack Exit - Method 25A

Compound: Total organic compounds (TOC) as 

Average

Run M25A-1 M25A-2 M25A-3

lb/mmBtuO2 3.85E-04 7.32E-04 6.30E-04 0.001

ppm 2.12E-01 4.01E-01 3.45E-01 0.319

ppm@7%O2 2.28E-01 4.35E-01 3.75E-01 0.346

Location: Stack Exit - Method 26A

Compound: Hydrogen Chloride

Average

RunNumber M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Mass_mg 19.182 27.412 27.865 24.820

lb/mmBtuO2 1.90E-02 2.74E-02 2.62E-02 0.024

Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride

Average

RunNumber M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Mass_mg 0.4 0.419 0.436 0.418

lb/mmBtuO2 3.95E-04 4.20E-04 4.09E-04 0.000

Location: Stack Exit - Method 29

Compound: Antimony

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.0028 0.0028 0.0028 0.003

lb/mmBtuO2 7.38E-07 7.43E-07 7.34E-07 0.000

Compound: Arsenic

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.00504 0.00496 0.005 0.005

lb/mmBtuO2 1.33E-06 1.32E-06 1.31E-06 0.000

Compound: Beryllium

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.001

lb/mmBtuO2 1.84E-07 1.86E-07 1.83E-07 0.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 23 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Compound: Cadmium

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.0007 0.00361 0.0007 0.002

lb/mmBtuO2 1.84E-07 9.58E-07 1.83E-07 0.000

Compound: Chromium

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.01388 0.01068 0.00719 0.011

lb/mmBtuO2 3.66E-06 2.83E-06 1.88E-06 0.000

Compound: Cobalt

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.00196 0.00215 0.00336 0.002

lb/mmBtuO2 5.16E-07 5.70E-07 8.81E-07 0.000

Compound: Filterable Particulate

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 75 69.8 67.6 70.800

lb/mmBtuO2 1.98E-02 1.85E-02 1.77E-02 0.019

Compound: Lead

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.0063 0.01019 0.00696 0.008

lb/mmBtuO2 1.66E-06 2.70E-06 1.82E-06 0.000

Compound: Manganese

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.02908 0.02069 0.01749 0.022

lb/mmBtuO2 7.66E-06 5.49E-06 4.58E-06 0.000

Compound: Nickel

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.01296 0.04936 0.01156 0.025

lb/mmBtuO2 3.41E-06 1.31E-05 3.03E-06 0.000

Compound: Selenium

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007

lb/mmBtuO2 1.84E-06 1.86E-06 1.83E-06 0.000

Location: Stack Exit - OTM - 27/28

Compound: Filterable Particulate

Average

RunNumber OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3

Mass_mg 0 0 0 0.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 24 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Process Run Data

lb/mmBtuO2 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.000

Compound: Filterable PM2.5

Average

RunNumber OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3

Mass_mg 3.4 4.7 4.2 4.100

lb/mmBtuO2 9.27E-04 1.57E-03 1.24E-03 0.001

Compound: Inorganic (Aqueous) Condensible Pa

Average

RunNumber OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3

Mass_mg 18 12 8.2 12.733

lb/mmBtuO2 4.91E-03 4.01E-03 2.43E-03 0.004

Compound: Organic Condensible Particulate

Average

RunNumber OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3

Mass_mg 7.5 8 7.5 7.667

lb/mmBtuO2 2.04E-03 2.67E-03 2.22E-03 0.002

Compound: Total Particulate

Average

RunNumber OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3

Mass_mg 0 0 0 0.000

lb/mmBtuO2 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.000

Compound: Total PM2.5

Average

RunNumber OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3

Mass_mg 28.9 24.7 19.9 24.500

lb/mmBtuO2 7.88E-03 8.25E-03 5.89E-03 0.007

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 25 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Process Run Data

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 72.9 /hr M29 & M5; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1238

2 73.8 /hr M29 & M5; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1536

3 74.8 /hr M29 & M5; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1107

1 Average Heat Input 1204.4 MMBtu/hr M29 & M5; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1238

2 Average Heat Input 1176.9 MMBtu/hr M29 & M5; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1536

3 Average Heat Input 1172.9 MMBtu/hr M29 & M5; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1107

1 Steam Output - Unit 1 388.6 1000 lb steam/hr M29 & M5; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1238

2 Steam Output - Unit 1 385.6 1000 lb steam/hr M29 & M5; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1536

3 Steam Output - Unit 1 390.6 1000 lb steam/hr M29 & M5; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1107

1 Flue Gas Flow Rate 19754 kscfh M29 & M5; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1238

1 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 8.4 % M29 & M5; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1238

1 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 11 % M29 & M5; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1238

1 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 369.2 Deg F M29 & M5; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1238

1 Unit Gross Electrical Output 89.1 Mwe M29 & M5; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1238

1 Unit Net Electric Generation 79.1 MWh M29 & M5; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1238

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 26 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

1 Coal Burned - Unit 2 73.3 1000 Tons/hr M29 & M5; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1238

2 Flue Gas Flow Rate 19967 kscfh M29 & M5; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1536

2 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 8.9 % M29 & M5; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1536

2 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 10.6 % M29 & M5; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1536

2 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 361.4 Deg F M29 & M5; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1536

2 Unit Gross Electrical Output 88 Mwe M29 & M5; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1536

2 Unit Net Electric Generation 78.1 MWh M29 & M5; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1536

2 Coal Burned - Unit 2 71.1 1000 Tons/hr M29 & M5; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1536

3 Flue Gas Flow Rate 19694 kscfh M29 & M5; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1107

3 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 8.7 % M29 & M5; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1107

3 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 10.7 % M29 & M5; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1107

3 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 367.1 Deg F M29 & M5; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1107

3 Unit Gross Electrical Output 88.5 Mwe M29 & M5; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1107

3 Unit Net Electric Generation 78.4 MWh M29 & M5; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1107

3 Coal Burned - Unit 2 73.5 1000 Tons/hr M29 & M5; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1107

1 Steam Output - Unit 2 389.5 1000 lb steam/hr M29 & M5; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1238

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 27 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

2 Steam Output - Unit 2 387 1000 lb steam/hr M29 & M5; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1536

3 Steam Output - Unit 2 387.2 1000 lb steam/hr M29 & M5; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1107

1 Steam Output - combined 775.9 1000 lb steam/hr M29 & M5; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1238

2 Steam Output - combined 771.4 1000 lb steam/hr M29 & M5; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1536

3 Steam Output - combined 775.1 1000 lb steam/hr M29 & M5; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1107

4 72.7 /hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 1; 6/8/10; 

1327-1544

4 Average Heat Input 1234.5 MMBtu/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 1; 6/8/10; 

1327-1544

4 Steam Output - Unit 1 391.9 1000 lb steam/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 1; 6/8/10; 

1327-1544

4 Flue Gas Flow Rate 20101 kscfh M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 1; 6/8/10; 

1327-1544

4 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 8.4 % M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 1; 6/8/10; 

1327-1544

4 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 11.1 % M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 1; 6/8/10; 

1327-1544

4 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 382.5 Deg F M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 1; 6/8/10; 

1327-1544

4 Unit Gross Electrical Output 89.6 Mwe M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 1; 6/8/10; 

1327-1544

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 28 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

4 Unit Net Electric Generation 79.8 MWh M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 1; 6/8/10; 

1327-1544

4 Coal Burned - Unit 2 73.2 1000 Tons/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 1; 6/8/10; 

1327-1544

4 Steam Output - Unit 2 390.3 1000 lb steam/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 1; 6/8/10; 

1327-1544

4 Steam Output - combined 783.7 1000 lb steam/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 1; 6/8/10; 

1327-1544

5 74.8 /hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 2; 6/10/10; 

1133-1344

5 Average Heat Input 1148.1 MMBtu/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 2; 6/10/10; 

1133-1344

5 Steam Output - Unit 1 389 1000 lb steam/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 2; 6/10/10; 

1133-1344

5 Flue Gas Flow Rate 19165 kscfh M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 2; 6/10/10; 

1133-1344

5 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 8.7 % M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 2; 6/10/10; 

1133-1344

5 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 10.8 % M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 2; 6/10/10; 

1133-1344

5 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 361 Deg F M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 2; 6/10/10; 

1133-1344

5 Unit Gross Electrical Output 88.2 Mwe M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 2; 6/10/10; 

1133-1344

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 29 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

5 Unit Net Electric Generation 78.5 MWh M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 2; 6/10/10; 

1133-1344

5 Coal Burned - Unit 2 74.4 1000 Tons/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 2; 6/10/10; 

1133-1344

5 Steam Output - Unit 2 385 1000 lb steam/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 2; 6/10/10; 

1133-1344

5 Steam Output - combined 776 1000 lb steam/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 2; 6/10/10; 

1133-1344

6 74.9 /hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 3; 6/10/10; 

1403-1610

6 Average Heat Input 1139.1 MMBtu/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 3; 6/10/10; 

1403-1610

6 Steam Output - Unit 1 387.2 1000 lb steam/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 3; 6/10/10; 

1403-1610

6 Flue Gas Flow Rate 19091 kscfh M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 3; 6/10/10; 

1403-1610

6 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 8.7 % M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 3; 6/10/10; 

1403-1610

6 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 10.7 % M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 3; 6/10/10; 

1403-1610

6 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 361.9 Deg F M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 3; 6/10/10; 

1403-1610

6 Unit Gross Electrical Output 88.5 Mwe M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 3; 6/10/10; 

1403-1610

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 30 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

6 Unit Net Electric Generation 79 MWh M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 3; 6/10/10; 

1403-1610

6 Coal Burned - Unit 2 72.9 1000 Tons/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 3; 6/10/10; 

1403-1610

6 Steam Output - Unit 2 389.3 1000 lb steam/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 3; 6/10/10; 

1403-1610

6 Steam Output - combined 777 1000 lb steam/hr M10, M25A & 

Formaldehyde; 

Run 3; 6/10/10; 

1403-1610

10 72.7 /hr M26A; Run 1; 

6/8/10;1517-1629

10 Average Heat Input 1109.7 MMBtu/hr M26A; Run 1; 

6/8/10;1517-1629

10 Steam Output - Unit 1 390.3 1000 lb steam/hr M26A; Run 1; 

6/8/10;1517-1629

10 Flue Gas Flow Rate 18454 kscfh M26A; Run 1; 

6/8/10;1517-1629

10 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 8.6 % M26A; Run 1; 

6/8/10;1517-1629

10 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 10.8 % M26A; Run 1; 

6/8/10;1517-1629

10 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 350.6 Deg F M26A; Run 1; 

6/8/10;1517-1629

10 Unit Gross Electrical Output 89.5 Mwe M26A; Run 1; 

6/8/10;1517-1629

10 Unit Net Electric Generation 79.8 MWh M26A; Run 1; 

6/8/10;1517-1629

10 Coal Burned - Unit 2 72.6 1000 Tons/hr M26A; Run 1; 

6/8/10;1517-1629

10 Steam Output - Unit 2 391.2 1000 lb steam/hr M26A; Run 1; 

6/8/10;1517-1629

10 Steam Output - combined 781.2 1000 lb steam/hr M26A; Run 1; 

6/8/10;1517-1629

11 74 /hr M26A; Run 2; 

6/9/10;1554-1707

11 Average Heat Input 1075 MMBtu/hr M26A; Run 2; 

6/9/10;1554-1707

11 Steam Output - Unit 1 385.1 1000 lb steam/hr M26A; Run 2; 

6/9/10;1554-1707

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 31 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

11 Flue Gas Flow Rate 18618 kscfh M26A; Run 2; 

6/9/10;1554-1707

11 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 9.1 % M26A; Run 2; 

6/9/10;1554-1707

11 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 10.4 % M26A; Run 2; 

6/9/10;1554-1707

11 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 337.1 Deg F M26A; Run 2; 

6/9/10;1554-1707

11 Unit Gross Electrical Output 87.8 Mwe M26A; Run 2; 

6/9/10;1554-1707

11 Unit Net Electric Generation 78.1 MWh M26A; Run 2; 

6/9/10;1554-1707

11 Coal Burned - Unit 2 71.7 1000 Tons/hr M26A; Run 2; 

6/9/10;1554-1707

11 Steam Output - Unit 2 387.3 1000 lb steam/hr M26A; Run 2; 

6/9/10;1554-1707

11 Steam Output - combined 769.8 1000 lb steam/hr M26A; Run 2; 

6/9/10;1554-1707

12 74.9 /hr M26A; Run 3; 

6/10/10;1307-1425

12 Average Heat Input 1200.6 MMBtu/hr M26A; Run 3; 

6/10/10;1307-1425

12 Steam Output - Unit 1 386.7 1000 lb steam/hr M26A; Run 3; 

6/10/10;1307-1425

12 Flue Gas Flow Rate 20020 kscfh M26A; Run 3; 

6/10/10;1307-1425

12 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 8.6 % M26A; Run 3; 

6/10/10;1307-1425

12 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 10.8 % M26A; Run 3; 

6/10/10;1307-1425

12 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 380.2 Deg F M26A; Run 3; 

6/10/10;1307-1425

12 Unit Gross Electrical Output 88.4 Mwe M26A; Run 3; 

6/10/10;1307-1425

12 Unit Net Electric Generation 78.8 MWh M26A; Run 3; 

6/10/10;1307-1425

12 Coal Burned - Unit 2 73.2 1000 Tons/hr M26A; Run 3; 

6/10/10;1307-1425

12 Steam Output - Unit 2 388.8 1000 lb steam/hr M26A; Run 3; 

6/10/10;1307-1425

12 Steam Output - combined 776.5 1000 lb steam/hr M26A; Run 3; 

6/10/10;1307-1425

13 72.9 /hr OTM 27/28; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1420

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 32 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

13 Average Heat Input 1216.9 MMBtu/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1420

13 Steam Output - Unit 1 388.5 1000 lb steam/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1420

13 Flue Gas Flow Rate 19854 kscfh OTM 27/28; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1420

13 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 8.4 % OTM 27/28; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1420

13 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 11 % OTM 27/28; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1420

13 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 373.1 Deg F OTM 27/28; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1420

13 Unit Gross Electrical Output 89.1 Mwe OTM 27/28; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1420

13 Unit Net Electric Generation 79.2 MWh OTM 27/28; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1420

13 Coal Burned - Unit 2 73.4 1000 Tons/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1420

13 Steam Output - Unit 2 389.3 1000 lb steam/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1420

13 Steam Output - combined 778 1000 lb steam/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

1; 6/8/10; 0825-

1420

14 73.8 /hr OTM 27/28; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1638

14 Average Heat Input 1158.8 MMBtu/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1638

14 Steam Output - Unit 1 385.5 1000 lb steam/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1638

14 Flue Gas Flow Rate 19711 kscfh OTM 27/28; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1638

14 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 8.9 % OTM 27/28; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1638

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 33 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

14 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 10.6 % OTM 27/28; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1638

14 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 356.9 Deg F OTM 27/28; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1638

14 Unit Gross Electrical Output 87.9 Mwe OTM 27/28; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1638

14 Unit Net Electric Generation 78.1 MWh OTM 27/28; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1638

14 Coal Burned - Unit 2 71.2 1000 Tons/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1638

14 Steam Output - Unit 2 386.6 1000 lb steam/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1638

14 Steam Output - combined 771.4 1000 lb steam/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

2; 6/9/10; 0954-

1638

15 74.8 /hr OTM 27/28; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1235

15 Average Heat Input 1159.8 MMBtu/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1235

15 Steam Output - Unit 1 390.1 1000 lb steam/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1235

15 Flue Gas Flow Rate 19442 kscfh OTM 27/28; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1235

15 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 8.7 % OTM 27/28; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1235

15 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 10.7 % OTM 27/28; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1235

15 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 362.9 Deg F OTM 27/28; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1235

15 Unit Gross Electrical Output 88.4 Mwe OTM 27/28; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1235

15 Unit Net Electric Generation 78.3 MWh OTM 27/28; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1235

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 34 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data

15 Coal Burned - Unit 2 73.8 1000 Tons/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1235

15 Steam Output - Unit 2 386.1 1000 lb steam/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1235

15 Steam Output - combined 775.6 1000 lb steam/hr OTM 27/28; Run 

3; 6/10/10; 0654-

1235

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 DRY LIMESTONE INJECTION 0 0

1 CENTRIFUGAL COLLECTOR (CYCLONE) - 

HIGH EFFICIENCY

0 0

1 BAGHOUSE 0 0

Run Name Value UOM Comments

1 Fuel Higher Heating Value 0 Btu/lb

1 Fuel Moisture 0 %

1 Fuel Mercury Content 0 ppm

1 Fuel Cadmium Content 0 ppm

1 Ultimate/Proximate Analysis 0

1 Fuel Nickel Content 0 ppm

1 Fuel Arsenic Content 0 ppm

1 Fuel Chromium Content 0 ppm

1 Fuel Beryllium Content 0 ppm

1 Fuel Lead Content 0 ppm

1 Fuel Manganese Content 0 ppm

1 Fuel Chlorine Content 0 ppm

1 Fuel Fluorine Content 0 ppm

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 35 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location Stack Exit - Method 10

Average

Run Number M10-1 M10-2 M10-3

Test Date 6/8/2010 6/10/2010 6/10/2010

Run Start Time 1:27:00 PM 11:33:00 AM 2:03:00 PM

Run Finish Time 3:44:00 PM 1:44:00 PM 4:10:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 11.8 11.7 11.7 11.733

Oxygen, % 8 8.1 8.1 8.067

Fuel Factor 1.09 1.09 1.09

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 312044 321091 320163 317,766.000

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Moisture, % 7.78 8.39 8.11 8.093

Analyzer Make TECO TECO TECO

Analyzer Model Model 48 Model 48 Model 48

Analyzer Serial Number 57854-315 57854-315 57854-315

Operating Range 100 100 100 100.000

Operating Units ppm ppm ppm

No. Readings/Avg. 274 262 254 263.333

Calibration Set 4 5 6 5.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID CC-20290 CC-20290 CC-20290

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.233

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID CC-94739 CC-94739 CC-94739

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 47.2 47.8 47.2 47.400

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID CC-20290 CC-20290 CC-20290

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.167

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias 0 -0.11 -0.11 -0.073

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0 0.11 0.11 0.073

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID CC-94739 CC-94739 CC-94739

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 47.3 47.2 47 47.167

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias 0.11 -0.63 -0.21 -0.243

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.11 0.63 0.21 0.317

Cavg 21.75 23.71 22.48 22.647

Cavg Units ppmvd ppmvd ppmvd

Cgas 21.5729 23.3855 22.4013 22.453

Cgas Units ppmvd ppmvd ppmvd

Fuel Type Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000

Cgasw Units

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 36 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 25A

Average

Run Number M25A-1 M25A-2 M25A-3

Test Date 6/8/2010 6/10/2010 6/10/2010

Run Start Time 1:27:00 PM 11:33:00 AM 2:03:00 PM

Run Finish Time 3:44:00 PM 1:44:00 PM 4:10:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 11.8 11.7 11.7 11.733

Oxygen, % 8 8.1 8.1 8.067

Fuel Factor 1.09 1.09 1.09

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 312044 321091 320163 317,766.000

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Moisture, % 7.78 8.39 8.11 8.093

Analyzer Make JUM JUM JUM

Analyzer Model Model VE-7 Model VE-7 Model VE-7

Analyzer Serial Number 1011404921 1011404921 1011404921 1,011,404,9

21.000

Operating Range 25 25 25 25.000

Operating Units ppm ppm ppm

No. Readings/Avg. 274 262 154 230.000

Calibration Set 7 8 9 8.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID CC-20290 CC-20290 CC-20290

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.1 0.1 -0.2 0.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID CC-114193 CC-114193 CC-114193

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 8.2 8 8.4 8.200

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID CC-20290 CC-20290 CC-20290

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.2 -0.2 0.2 0.067

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias 0.36 -1.07 1.43 0.240

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0.36 1.07 1.43 0.953

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID CC-114193 CC-114193 CC-114193

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 8.4 8.4 8.2 8.333

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias 0.71 1.43 -0.71 0.477

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.71 1.43 0.71 0.950

Cavg 0.35 0.33 0.33 0.337

Cavg Units ppmvw ppmvw ppmvw

Cgas 0.2121 0.4007 0.3448 0.319

Cgas Units ppmvd ppmvd ppmvd

Fuel Type Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Cgasw 0.1955828220

8589

0.367103030

30303

0.316879518

072289

0.293

Cgasw Units ppmvw ppmvw ppmvw

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 37 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 26A

Average

Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Test Date 6/8/2010 6/9/2010 6/10/2010

Run Start Time 3:17:00 PM 3:54:00 PM 1:07:00 PM

Run Finish Time 4:29:00 PM 5:07:00 PM 2:25:00 PM

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.850

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.001 1.001 1.005 1.002

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.8 28.5 28.6 28.633

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.22 1.18 1.36 1.253

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 39.415 37.753 40.299 39.156

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 104.46 73.77 86.85 88.360

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 35.635 35.716 37.510 36.287

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 52.15 93.4 45.4 63.650

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.45 4.40 2.14 2.997

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 6.43 10.97 5.40 7.600

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000

Dry Mole Fraction 0.9357 0.8903 0.946 0.924

Carbon Dioxide, % 11.6 11.5 11.7 11.600

Oxygen, % 8.1 8.3 8.1 8.167

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.3 80.2 80.2 80.233

Fuel Factor 1.10 1.10 1.09

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.18 30.17 30.20 30.183

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.40 28.83 29.54 29.257

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.89 -0.8 -0.93 -0.873

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.73 28.44 28.53 28.567

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 380.46 368.77 381.85 377.027

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 1.4509451150

2191

1.400605703

85375

1.439434991

13122

1.430

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 87.31 86.46 87.13 86.967

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 106.139 106.139 106.139 106.139

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 313,846.8 296,855.9 313,924.0 308,208.900

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 556,019.8 550,606.7 554,873.5 553,833.333

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 96.8 102.6 101.9 100.433

Percent Excess Air, % 61.8 64.5 62.0 62.767

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Round Duct Diameter, inches 139.5 139.5 139.5

Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0

Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 38 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Location Stack Exit - Method 29

Average

Run Number M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Test Date 6/8/2010 6/9/2010 6/10/2010

Run Start Time 8:25:00 AM 9:54:00 AM 6:54:00 AM

Run Finish Time 12:38:00 PM 3:36:00 PM 11:07:00 AM

Net Traversing Points 48 48 48

Net Run Time, minutes 240 240 240

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.188 0.188 0.188 0.188

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.005 1.001 1.001 1.002

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.8 28.5 28.6 28.633

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.04 1.03 1.01 1.027

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 142.365 140.686 142.744 141.932

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 81.37 70.86 78.35 76.860

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 134.676 133.775 134.305 134.252

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 241.1 277 277 265.033

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 11.35 13.04 13.04 12.477

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 7.77 8.88 8.85 8.500

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000

Dry Mole Fraction 0.9223 0.9112 0.9115 0.915

Carbon Dioxide, % 11.7 11.7 11.8 11.733

Oxygen, % 8.2 8.2 8.1 8.167

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.1 80.1 80.1 80.100

Fuel Factor 1.09 1.09 1.08

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.20 30.20 30.21 30.203

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.25 29.12 29.13 29.167

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.8 -0.88 -0.9 -0.860

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.74 28.44 28.53 28.570

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 377.71 368.84 372.35 372.967

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 1.4764208614

7399

1.462862766

66723

1.434590892

66895

1.458

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 87.10 86.89 86.08 86.690

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 106.139 106.139 106.139 106.139

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 309,729.1 305,310.0 302,240.9 305,760.000

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 554,682.4 553,345.1 548,186.7 552,071.400

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.8 100.5 101.9 100.733

Percent Excess Air, % 63.3 63.3 62.1 62.900

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Round Duct Diameter, inches 139.5 139.5 139.5

Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0

Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 39 of 40
American Bituminous - Unit 1/2

9/9/2010

Location Stack Exit - OTM - 27/28

Average

Run Number OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3

Test Date 6/8/2010 6/9/2010 6/10/2010

Run Start Time 8:25:00 AM 9:54:00 AM 6:54:00 AM

Run Finish Time 2:20:00 PM 4:38:00 PM 12:35:00 PM

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Net Run Time, minutes 345.75 300 332.25

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.164 0.15 0.15 0.155

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.001 1.005 1.005 1.004

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.8 28.5 28.6 28.633

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 0.44 0.43 0.43 0.433

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 138.340 110.635 125.147 124.707

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 85.38 66.77 74.31 75.487

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 129.192 106.276 118.935 118.134

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 200.8 209.8 228.5 213.033

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 9.45 9.88 10.76 10.030

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 6.82 8.51 8.30 7.877

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000

Dry Mole Fraction 0.9318 0.9149 0.917 0.921

Carbon Dioxide, % 11.8 11.6 11.8 11.733

Oxygen, % 8.1 8.2 8.1 8.133

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.1 80.2 80.1 80.133

Fuel Factor 1.08 1.09 1.08

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.21 30.18 30.21 30.200

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.38 29.14 29.20 29.240

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.88 -0.92 -0.91 -0.903

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.74 28.43 28.53 28.567

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 376.77 366.85 372.62 372.080

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 1.5037640847

0516

1.488083754

44909

1.463940132

77588

1.485

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 87.66 87.52 86.86 87.347

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 106.139 106.139 106.139 106.139

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 315,285.1 309,406.6 306,720.4 310,470.700

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 558,248.7 557,357.1 553,154.0 556,253.267

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 85.7 99.0 100.9 95.200

Percent Excess Air, % 62.1 63.2 62.1 62.467

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Round Duct Diameter, inches 139.5 139.5 139.5

Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0

Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 40 of 40