alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. ss.1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bancorp of New Jersey, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the "Report") as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, we Joseph Kliminski, Chief Executive Officer, and Eric Heyer, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and                                                                                                                                          
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | The information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial
statements included in such report.

|Dated: | February 9, 2007 |  | /s/ Joseph KliminskiJoseph KliminskiChief Executive Officer                    
|------ | ---------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: | February 9, 2007 |  | /s/ Eric B. HeyerEric B. HeyerSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14**

**PROMULGATED UNDER**

**SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

I, Ray Wirta, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CBRE Realty Finance, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for the registrant and we have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and 

(b) [Omitted inreliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986, Section III E.] 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 14, 2007
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 19, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1787 Lower Tribunal No.16-8303

________________ 

### Aymara Sorhegui , Appellant,
vs. 

### Park East Home Owners Association, Inc., etc. , Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Judge. Aymara Sorhegui, in proper person. Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., and Lilliana M. Farinas-Sabogal, for appellee. Before SCALES, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Title 129

- Department of Environmental Quality Chapter 32 Effective Date 12/15/98 (Rev. 6/26/94)

Chapter 32

- DUST; DUTY TO PREVENT ESCAPE OF

001 Handling, Transportation, Storing. No person may cause or permit the handling, transporting or storage of any material in a manner which may allow particulate matter to become airborne in such quantities and concentrations that it remains visible in the ambient air beyond the premises where it originates.

002 Construction, Use, Repair, Demolition. No person may cause or permit a building or its appurtenances or a road, or a driveway, or an open area to be constructed, used, repaired or demolished without applying all such reasonable measures to prevent particulate matter from becoming airborne so that it rema ins visible beyond the premises where it originates. The Director may require such reasonable measures as may be necessary to prevent particulate matter from becoming airborne, including but not limited to paving or frequent cleaning of roads, driveways an d parking lots; application of dust

- free surfaces; application of water; and the planting and maintenance of vegetative ground cover.

003 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, the Department shall not regulate emissions from normal farming practices, on

- farm crop drying and handling, and animal feeding activities, provided that reasonable and practical measures to limit particulate matter from such

sources are utilized.

Enabling Legislation: Neb. Rev. Stat. §§81

- 1504(1)(2); 81

- 1505(12)

L egal Citation: Title 129, Ch. 32, Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality

www.DEQ.state.NE.US Home Page Security, Privac y & Accessibility Policy Nebraska.gov

Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality

1200 "N" Street, Suite 400
P.O. Box 98922 Lincoln, Nebraska 68509 (402) 471

- 2186
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |

|         |                                                                                                                                                         |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                     |
|                                                                |
| Dated: November 7, 2017                                        |
|                                                                |
| /s/ Venugopal Rathi                                                 |
| Venugopal RathiChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| * | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. |
1 WR

- 85,011

- 01

, WR

- 85,011 -0 2, WR

- 85,011 -0 3, WR

- 85,011 -04

EX PARTE § IN THE TEXAS § § COURT OF § EDUARDO ENRIQUE ALFARO § CRIMINAL APPEALS

MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING

THE FILING OF EVIDENCE IN THE TRIAL COURT

TO TH E HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

COMES NOW EDUARDO ENRIQUE ALFARO, Applicant, and

respectfully asks this Court to stay the proceedings in t his case

.

Alfaro’s application s for writ of habeas corpus were filed on October

7, 2015, in the 401 st Judicial District Court. Upon the State’s filing of a

reply on March 24, 2016 , Alfaro asked the court for time to file a response

before the court made its findings. A response was crucial —i n the State’s

reply

, the State argued Alfaro had not shown his attorneys were

ineffective in fail ing to consult with a forensic psychologist as to

mitigation evidence to present at punishment because Alfaro did not

“provide[ ] any evidence of what such testimony would have be en.” (Resp.

at 13). But Alfaro’s failure to provide evidence of what a forensic

psychologist would have testified was not knowing

— it was a cleric al

WR-85,011-01 ,02,03,04

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
Transmitted 6/2/2016 11:01:05 AM Accepted 6/2/2016 11:21:01 AM

ABEL ACOSTA
CLERK2 oversight. Alfaro simply for got to attach his examining forensic

psychologist ’s report. Acco rdingly, Alfaro sought to respond to the State’s

reply with the report attached hereto

.

The state was aware of this and

, in fact

, agreed to Alfaro’s request

to supplement the record with the report

. Additionally, c ounsel spoke to

the Judge of the 401 st Judicial District Court, Mark Rus c h

, and he agreed

to the request

. For some indeterminable reason, however, without any

order or notice to either Alfaro or the State

, the case was then transferred

to the 199 th Judicial District Court. On April 26, 2016 , t hat court without

prior notice to c ounsel then entered findings and conclusions

recommending Alfaro’s application be denied and forwarded the case to

this Court on May 2, 2016.

Those Findings and Conclusions were prematurely entered. Alfaro

has additional evidence to be submit ted and requests a stay to provide

said evidence to the trial court. Accordingly, Alfaro respectfully asks that

this motion be granted.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Bruce Anton

B RUCE A NTON Bar Card No. 012747003 S ORRELS

, U DASHEN & A NTON 2311 Cedar Springs Road

Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 75201

214

- 468

- 8100

214

- 468

- 8104 (fax)

Attorney for Applicant

Certificate of Service

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing M otion to Stay Proceedings Pending the Filing of Evidence in

t he Trial Court was served to the Collin County District Attorney’s Office

and the 401 st Judicial District Court on June 2, 2016.

/s/ Bruce Anton

B RUCE A NTON
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41373 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EDNA MARTINEZ SIERRA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-26-ALL

-------------------- July 2, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Edna Martinez Sierra appeals her jury conviction and sentence for income tax fraud pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 287, 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1)&(2). She argues that the evidence was insufficient to find her guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; that the district court erred in not holding a hearing to determine whether extrinsic evidence tainted the jury’s verdict; and that the district court erred in calculating the amount of monetary loss to the government pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1. The standard of review in assessing Sierra's sufficiency-of-evidence challenge is "whether, considering allNo. 00-41373 -2- the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, a reasonable trier of fact could have found that the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt." United States v. Mendoza , 226 F.3d 340, 343 (5th Cir. 2000). We hold that the evidence was sufficient for the jury to find Sierra guilty beyond a reasonable doubt on all counts charged in the indictment. The district court's decision whether to hold an evidentiary hearing to investigate allegations of juror misconduct is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Jobe , 101 F.3d 1046, 1057-58 (5th Cir. 1996). We hold that Sierra has not made a “colorable showing of extrinsic influence” and therefore has not demonstrated that the district court abused its discretion in determining that an evidentiary hearing was
unnecessary. See id. This court reviews a district court's loss determination pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1 for clear error. United States v.
Oates , 122 F.3d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1997). We further hold that the district court did not clearly err in its calculation of the total monetary loss attributable to Sierra’s criminal conduct. We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
# Delegation of Reporting Function Specified In Section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense [and] the Secretary of Energy 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, I hereby delegate to you the reporting function conferred upon the President by section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81).

                    The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register.*

[FR Doc. 2012-5270

Billing code 5000-04-P
Exhibit 13.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the amended Annual Report of Globetech Ventures Corp. (the ACompany@) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the AReport@), I, Casey Forward, President and Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: April 11, 2011
By:
/s/ Casey ForwardCasey ForwardPresident and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Globetech Ventures Corp. and will be retained by Globetech Ventures Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.77 MB)

Tags:EEO, Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, Defense Logistics Agency, Days of Remembrance, Holocaust Observance Program

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing Tax Credits L.P. V (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.











/s/Kenneth J. Cutillo


Kenneth J. Cutillo


Principal Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer


Arch Street VIII, Inc., as


Managing General Partner of


Boston Financial Qualified


Housing Tax Credits L.P. V








Date:            June 29, 2011











A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DARLENE PEOPLES, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D23-46

LT Case No. 2017-CA-3340

COMMUNITY REHABILITATION CENTER,

INC., 

 Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed February 28, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Duval County, 

Eric Roberson, Judge.

Lindsey Lawton, of Lawton Law,

PLLC, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

John Daniel Webb, of John D.

Webb, P.A., Jacksonville, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., WALLIS and SOUD, JJ., concur.
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Pippin, Sheri (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 7:36 PM

To: ellen.birmingham@united.com

Subject: Docket FAA 2015-5566 Use Outside U.S.

Ms. Birmingham,

In accordance with Title 14 CFR § 11.81(h), if United Airlines wants to exercise the privileges of an exemption, if granted,

outside the United States, “the reason why you need to do so” must be included in the petition for exemption.

Otherwise, in accordance with § 11.83, the FAA will limit the exemption, if granted, to use within the United States.

The United Airlines petition for exemption from Title 14 CFR §§ 121.438 and 121.652, dated November 3, 2015, revised

December 15, 2015, did not specifically request use of the petition outside of the United States. However, the FAA is

aware that United Airlines conducts international operations with the Boeing 767. Therefore, the FAA requests

clarification on whether United Airlines wants to exercise the privileges of this exemption, if granted, outside the United

States.

Please submit the clarification directly to the docket ID FAA‐2015‐5566. If United Airlines wants to exercise the privileges

of this exemption, if granted, outside the United States, please also include the information required by § 11.81(h).

Thanks,

Sheri Pippin

Air Transportation Division

Air Carrier Training Systems and Voluntary Safety Programs Branch, AFS‐280

800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591

(310) 725‐7342

Remote Sited Address: Los Angeles IFO, 15000 Aviation Blvd. Lawndale, CA 90261

This message is intended solely for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is

privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this communication in

error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email.  Thank you