alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation
150 South Wacker Drive, 28th Floor
Chicago, IL  60606
Tel. 312-499-5400
Fax  312-499-5406

GMAC Commercial Mortgage (LOGO)


GMAC Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. Series 1999-C3
Annual Statement as to Compliance
For the Year Ended December 31, 1999

Pursuant to Section 3.13 of the Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement  governing the
referenced transaction, I hereby attest that:

v.   A review of the  activities  of GMAC  Commercial  Mortgage  Corporation  as
     Master  Servicer  during  the  period,  and of its  performance  under this
     Pooling and Servicing Agreement, has been made under my supervision.

vi.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, GMAC Commercial Mortgage
     Corporation as Master Servicer,  has fulfilled in all material respects its
     obligations  under this  Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement  throughout  the
     period.

v.   GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation,  as Master Servicer,  has received no
     notice regarding  qualifications,  or challenging the status,  of the Trust
     Fund as a REMIC or of the  Grantor  Trust as a  "grantor  trust"  under the
     Grantor Trust  Provisions  from the Internal  Revenue  Service or any other
     governmental agency or body.


BY:
     Gary Severyn
     Senior Vice President
     GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation

Date:
     4/15/2000
#### Michele Gibbs, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Mary Gibbs, et al., Respondents, v Grenadier Realty Corp., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Hansel McGee, J.), entered March 30, 1990, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Michele Gibbs, then 17 years of age, was allegedly attacked in an elevator by a dog owned by a tenant in premises owned by defendant Grenadier Realty Corp. When the attack took place, the dog, a "pit bull”, was unleashed and unsupervised.

In opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment, plaintiff and her mother averred that the landlord, through its agents/employees, was aware not only of the dog’s presence in the building, but also knew that the dog was allowed to roam loose in the building’s lobby and nearby grounds without a leash, in violation of the building’s House Rules, and that on numerous occasions, the dog was observed by the landlord’s employees/agents barking at and attacking a stick in a "vi*172cious manner.” These contentions raise issues of fact as to whether defendant had prior knowledge of the dog’s vicious propensities, and of the fact that it was allowed to roam the premises without restraint, so as to impose liability on the defendant. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8) pertaining to the COMSYS IT Partners, Inc. 2004Stock Incentive Plan and 2003 Equity Incentive Plan of COMSYS IT Partners, Inc. (No. 333-120334), the Personnel Group of America, Inc. 2001 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan (No. 333-66334), the 1997 Employer Stock Purchase Plan ofPersonnel Group of America, Inc. (No. 333-39361), and the 1995 Equity Participation Plan of the Personnel Group of America, Inc. (No. 333-01954) of our report dated March 22, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and scheduleof COMSYS IT Partners, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 2, 2005. 

 

Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Houston, Texas 

March 30, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TAL International Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Burns, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
April 29, 2011

/s/ JOHN BURNS John Burns Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
*Consent of Independent Accountants*
          We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-01954, 333-39361 and 333-66334) and FormS-3 (File No. 333-31863) of Venturi Partners, Inc. of our report dated February10, 2004 relating to the financial statements which appears inthe Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation byreference of our report dated February 10, 2004 relating to thefinancial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12889-12890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5156]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDIO TRUST


Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Sec.  103(c)(6) of the Presidio Trust Act, 
16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix, and in accordance with the Presidio Trust's 
bylaws, notice is hereby given that a public meeting of the Presidio 
Trust Board of Directors will be held commencing 6:30 p.m. on 
Wednesday, March 14, 2012, at the Golden Gate Club, 135 Fisher Loop, 
Presidio of San Francisco, California. The Presidio Trust was created 
by Congress in 1996 to manage approximately eighty percent of the 
former U.S. Army base known as the Presidio, in San Francisco, 
California.
    The purposes of this meeting are to take action on the minutes of a 
previous Board meeting, to take action on forming Board Committees, to 
provide the Chairperson's report, to provide the Executive Director's 
report, to provide partners' reports, to provide program updates, and 
to receive public comment on other matters in accordance with the 
Trust's Public Outreach Policy.
    Individuals requiring special accommodation at this meeting, such 
as

[[Page 12890]]

needing a sign language interpreter, should contact Mollie Matull at 
415.561.5300 prior to March 9, 2012.
    Times: The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, March 14, 
2012.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Golden Gate Club, 135 Fisher 
Loop, Presidio of San Francisco.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Cook, General Counsel, the 
Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, 
California 94129-0052, Telephone: 415.561.5300.

    Dated: February 27, 2012.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-5156 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P
#### Carole Jacone et al., Respondents-Appellants, v Ann DeRosa et al., Appellants-Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*to impose a constructive trust upon certain real property, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Zeck, J.H.O.) dated June 22, 1989, which, after a nonjury trial, (1) is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them in the principal sum of $83,600, (2) grants the plaintiffs an equitable lien, and (3) grants the plaintiffs execution of the lien by public sale, and the plaintiffs cross-appeal from the same judgment on the ground of inadequacy.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the amount awarded to the plaintiffs, to wit, $83,600, and substituting therefor a provision awarding them the amounts expended by them in repairing the defendants’ home and in contributing to maintenance expenses, which amount is to be offset by the amounts paid by the defendants in maintenance expenses; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a hearing and determination with respect to those amounts, and for the entry of an appropriate amended judgment.

We agree with the defendants that the court should have awarded the plaintiffs an equitable lien for the amounts that the plaintiffs expended in repairing the defendants’ home while believing that the defendants would deed the house to them, and not for the amount representing the increase of value of the defendants’ home *(see, Scivoletti v Marsala,*97 AD2d 401, *affd*61 NY2d 806; *Petrukevich v Maksimovich,*1 AD2d 786).

We have considered the defendants’ and the plaintiffs’ re*526maining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

April 21, 2005

Before

 Hon. Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge

 Hon. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge

 Hon. Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge

No. 04-2549

Premcor USA, Inc., and the Premcor

Refining Group, Inc.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

American Home Assurance

Company,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of

Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 03 C 7377

John W. Darrah

Judge.

ORDER

The petition for rehearing filed by plaintiffs-appellants on March 22, 2005, is

GRANTED. The panel decision issued on March 9, 2005, is amended as follows:

Page 2, line 1, after “ . . . Illinois state court case.” insert: “Premcor also

argues that AHA had a duty to indemnify it for any liability incurred.”

Page 12, insert paragraph as new subpart D: “Finally, Premcor argues that

the district court should not have granted summary judgment on the issue of

AHA’s duty to indemnify. As the underlying state action remains pending on

appeal in the Illinois courts, Premcor is correct—the district court acted

precipitously. See, e.g., Outboard Marine Corp., 607 N.E. 2d at 1221 (“[T]he

question of whether the insurer has a duty to indemnify the insured for a

particular liability is only ripe for consideration if the insured has already

incurred liability in the underlying claim against it.”). Therefore, we reverse

the district court’s judgment on this point and remand for either dismissal
No. 04-2549 Page 2

without prejudice of this issue or a stay of the proceedings relating to this

issue until the underlying action in the Illinois state court has become final

(and any liability is determined).”

Page 12, section III, revise last sentence to read: “Summary judgment for

AHA on the duty to defend issues was correct. Summary judgment on the

duty to indemnify issue was premature, and we remand that issue to the

district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
### AEROTECHNIK CZ 

### 686 04 

### Kunovice CZECH 

### REPUBLIC Tel.: +420 632 537 111 Fax: +420 632 537 900 e-mail :aerotechnik@evektor.cz 

### issues 

# MA CTIN SW 

# 13-045a SEH 

# 13-003a SP 

# Y RELA'I'ED

TECHNICAL DATA ARE 

### APPROVED BY TI-CAA CZECH REP. Date: 12/15/98

1. REFER TO : 

### 2. REASON :

3. 

### REQUIRED ACTION : AllL 13SW,L 13 SE,L 13SEH,L 13SL,L 13SDM,andL 13SDL Vivat powered sailplanes Color marking of elevator drive, which controls and connects both elevator halves, is not checked and re-painted during sailplane operation. The elevator drive is not symmetrical and its improper installation causes significant elevator deflection changes. Paint with red color (or other clearly distinguishable color if sailplane tail unit is red) the left arm ofthe elevator drive together with its hinge on the left half of the elevator. The elevator drive marking check and possibly drive repainting must be done during each annual inspection.
4. 

### LATEST DATE OFTHE ACTION: Immediately after obtaining this bulletin 

### 5. ACTION CARRIED OUT BY : Sailplane operator 6. 

### COSTS COVEREDBY : Sailplane operator 

### 7. REQUIRED MATERIAL : Supplied by sailplane operator 8. 

### OPERATING SEQUENCE : Not described 

### 9. APPENDICES: None

AEROTECHNIK CZ, s 

### . r 

## . o 

## . 686 04 KUNOVICE tel.: 06321537 111, fax: 537 900 Dipl. Ing. Josef HRON Date: 12/4/98 Sailplane Manufacturer Representative

Page: 

### 1of 

### 1
McElmo Creek 

Unit Main Flare

CLEAN AIR ACT PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT 

DETERIORATION PERMIT AMENDMENT

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9

November 20, 2014
What is EPA’s Action?

•EPA is amending the Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration (PSD) permit for the MCU Facility to: 

Add pollution limits and other terms and conditions as required by a federal Consent 

Decree (United States v. Mobil Exploration and Producing U.S. Inc.) for the existing 

Main Flare at the site. 

Remove and update other permit requirements due to equipment that has been shut 

down and removed from the site. 

•Other than the replacement of a fixed speed fan with a variable speed 

fan to provide better pollution control at the Main Flare, this permit 

action does not authorize any new construction or modification of 

existing equipment at the site.
What is the Main Flare?

• The Main Flare is an existing device used to 

burn waste gases from various sources at 

the McElmo Creek Unit oilfield.

• The McElmo Creek Unit oilfield is primarily 

involved in crude petroleum oil production, 

and is one of four oilfield units in the 

greater Aneth oilfield on the Navajo Nation 

Reservation in southeastern Utah.

• The McElmo Creek Unit oilfield operation 

includes field operations and a gas 

compression plant. 

 Field Operations - About 90 producing wells 

where petroleum crude oil is recovered. 

 Gas Compression Plant - Used to support 

recovery of crude oil in the McElmo Creek 

Unit oilfield; Main Flare is physically located 

here. 
What is BACT for the Main 

Flare?

The pollution limits and other terms and conditions that will be added into 

the permit include the following Best Available Control Technology (BACT) limitations and conditions to minimize flaring.

Emissions from the Main Flare must not exceed 60 tons per year (tpy) sulfur dioxide, 13.4 tpy nitrogen oxides, 73 tpy carbon monoxide, and 95.4 

tpy volatile organic compounds

 Operate the Main Flare using air-assist technology

 Ensure that the net heating value for dilution is greater than or equal to 

24.4 BTU/ft2

 Operate and maintain Main Flare in accordance with the federal flare 

standards in 40 CFR § 60.18

 Follow other operations and maintenance, root cause, and corrective 

action requirements
What are the air quality 

impacts?

•The proposed amendments to the 

PSD permit:

Will not cause or contribute to a 

violation of EPA’s National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards; and

Are not expected to adversely impact 

the air quality of any designated federal 

Class I areas (i.e., national parks and 

wilderness areas) within 200 km of the 

site.
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Probe Manufacturing, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:  (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  May 21, 2010By: /s/ John BennettChief Financial OfficerDateJohn Bennett  The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information language in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday, March 2, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the event that the times 
or dates of these or any future meetings change, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted 
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-4864 Filed 2-24-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
## EPA SLN No. KS-040004*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment**Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment**Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment**Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment**Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment**Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment**Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment**Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment**Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment**Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, David M. Kepler, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Greenville Federal FinancialCorporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: February 12, 2008 /s/David M. Kepler   David M. Kepler   President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13119-13120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5237]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR12-15-000]


Enogex LLC; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on February 24, 2011, Enogex LLC (Enogex) filed 
pursuant to Exhibit A to its Operating Conditions Applicable to 
Transportation Services (SOC) and section 284.123(e) of the 
Commission's regulations, to revise its annual fuel percentages as more 
fully described in the filing.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a

[[Page 13120]]

document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e787b6c7d71505257505b6d4b4e4e514c4a7e585b4c5d10595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96d0d3c4d5d9f8fafff8f3c5e3e6e6f9e4e2d6f0f3e4f5b8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 27, 2012.

    Dated: February 28, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5237 Filed 3-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>