alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 341 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 341

 Observing the 100<SUP>th</SUP> birthday of civil rights leader Daisy 
         Bates and honoring her legacy as an American heroine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 29, 2014

Mr. Pryor submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Observing the 100<SUP>th</SUP> birthday of civil rights leader Daisy 
         Bates and honoring her legacy as an American heroine.

Whereas Daisy Lee Gatson Bates was born on November 11, 1914, in Huttig, 
        Arkansas;
Whereas in 1941, Daisy Bates and her husband, Lucious Christopher ``L.C.'' 
        Bates, founded the Arkansas State Press, a weekly African-American 
        newspaper that promoted awareness of social injustice and championed 
        civil rights;
Whereas Daisy Bates took a leadership role in the civil rights movement and 
        became president of the Arkansas State Conference of NAACP Branches in 
        1952;
Whereas in 1957, Daisy Bates became an advisor to the Little Rock Nine and was a 
        champion for public school integration;
Whereas, on September 23, 1957, and September 25, 1957, Daisy Bates courageously 
        led members of the Little Rock Nine from her home to their first days at 
        Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas;
Whereas in the face of mounting opposition, death threats, harassment, arrests, 
        and violence, Daisy Bates continued her work in advising the Little Rock 
        Nine and fighting for them to attend Central High School;
Whereas after completing her work with the Little Rock Nine, Daisy Bates 
        continued her work in public service as a community organizer and by 
        working on anti-poverty programs;
Whereas in 1990, Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton recognized Daisy Bates as the 
        ``most distinguished Arkansas citizen of all time'';
Whereas, on November 4, 1999, Daisy Bates died in Little Rock, Arkansas;
Whereas in 2001, the Arkansas General Assembly designated the third Monday in 
        February as ``Daisy Gatson Bates Day'' to celebrate her contributions to 
        civil rights; and
Whereas generations of Americans can look to Daisy Bates as an example of 
        determination, courage, and leadership for promoting social justice and 
        equality: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) observes the 100<SUP>th</SUP> birthday of civil rights 
        leader Daisy Bates; and
            (2) commemorates the legacy of Daisy Bates by encouraging 
        all people of the United States to promote social justice, 
        equality, and the principles of the Constitution.
                                 <all>
```
## FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

DATE: March 3

, 2022

CASE OF: IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF

JUVENILE PROCEDUR E

– 20 21 FAST

- TRACK

REPORT

DOCKET NO.: SC 21

- 1 681

OPINION FILED: February 3

, 202 2

ATTENTION: ALL PUBLISHERS

THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION S H AVE BEEN MADE IN THE

ABOVE OPINION:

On page 10

, “ shall be ” was changed to “ is ” in the second line of

Rule 8.217(d).

On page 15, line 20 , inserted “(c)

– (i) [No change]” in bold lettering.

SIGNED: OPINION CLERK
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  |  | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended June 29, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             |  |                                                                     
|---------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:    September 29, 2005 |  | /s/ Martin A. Lynch                                                 
|                             |  | Martin A. Lynch Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer



Note: A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and will be retained by Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
;'

SERVED: JULY 18, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF SKYWESTAIRLINES, FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0293
NOTICE OFASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as CaseNo. 2012NM060040) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the otherpersons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite2W10001



### Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

### Director

- Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 ONE COPY



### Michael L. 

### Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

### MICHAEL L. 

### DWORKIN AND ASSOCIATES 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, CA 94104 TEL: 415-421-2500 FAX: 415-421-2560 EMAIL: law@avialex.com Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

### Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1417 FAX: 425-227-1007 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0293 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-

### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant ·FAX: 202-366-7536



### -3-
John Kinross-Kennedy, C.P.A. 17848 Skypark Circle Irvine, CA  92614-6401 (949) 955-2522.  Fax (949) 724-3817 jkinross@zamucen.com   February 14, 2013    Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street NE Washington, DC 20549    RE: Microelectronics Technology Company  We have read the statements that we understand Microelectronics Technology Company, will include under Item 5 of the Form 10-Q report it will file regarding the recent change of auditors. We agree with such statements made regarding our firm.   Very Truly Yours,  /s/John Kinross-Kennedy, CPA  John Kinross-Kennedy, CPA
#### SOUTH SALT LAKE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Kitty K. BURTON, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 20879.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 8, 1986.

*406Kitty K. Burton, pro-se.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Clint Balmforth, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Defendant was convicted of driving a motor vehicle without a valid driver’s license, by a jury sitting in the Justice of the Peace Court of South Salt Lake. She was sentenced to serve 90 days in the Salt Lake County jail and to pay a fine of $299, the jail sentence to be suspended upon payment of the fine. Defendant appealed to the district court and was provided a trial de novo.1 After this trial, the court clerk recorded in a minute entry: “The court thereupon finds in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant and orders the previously imposed sentence reinstated.”

The record does not show that defendant was resentenced following the trial de novo, and the minute entry was not signed by the judge. An unsigned minute entry is not susceptible of enforcement and does not constitute a final judgment for purposes of appeal to this Court. *See Wisden v. City of Salina,*Utah, 696 P.2d 1205 (1985); *Wilson v. Manning,*Utah, 645 P.2d 655 (1982); *State Tax Commission v. Erekson,*Utah, 714 P.2d 1151 (1986). This appeal is therefore dismissed as it is not properly before this Court.

Dismissed.

1

. The justice of the peace court is not a court of record in this state. Appeals to the district court are on questions of fact as well as law under U.C.A., 1953, § 78-3-5 and are therefore heard anew. *See State v. Johnson,*Utah, 700 P.2d 1125 (1985).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                                 SUBSIDIARIES OF
                         INTERNATIONAL WIRE GROUP, INC.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             JURISDICTION OF
                                                             INCORPORATION OR
SUSIDIARY                                                      ORGANIZATION
<S>                                                            <C>
Wirekraft Industries, Inc.................................     Delaware
ECM Holding Company.......................................     Delaware
Wirekraft Employment Company..............................     Delaware
Electro Componentes de Mexico, S.A. de C.V................     Mexico
Wirekraft Industries de Mexico, S.A. de C.V...............     Mexico
Omega Wire, Inc...........................................     Delaware
OWI Corporation...........................................     New York
Wire Technologies, Inc....................................     Indiana
Wire Harness Industries, Inc..............................     Delaware
Camden Wire Company, Inc..................................     New York
IWG-Philippines, Inc......................................     Philippines
IWG International, Inc....................................     Barbados
International Wire Rome Operations, Inc...................     Delaware
Italtrecce-Societa Italiana Trecce & Affini S.r.l.........     Italy
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5340]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL12-2-000]


Southwest Power Pool, Inc.; Notice of Initiation of Proceeding 
and Refund Effective Date

    On February 29, 2012, the Commission issued an order that initiated 
a proceeding in Docket No. EL12-2-000, pursuant to section 206 of the 
Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2006), to determine the 
justness and reasonableness of certain language in section VII.8(b) of 
Attachment O of Southwest Power Pool's existing open access 
transmission tariff. Southwest Power Pool, Inc., 138 FERC ] 61,150 
(2012).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL12-2-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 29, 2012.
 Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
 Deputy Secretary
[FR Doc. 2012-5340 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1696 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1696

  To require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study of video game 
                       console energy efficiency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2009

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study of video game 
                       console energy efficiency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Green Gaming Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. VIDEO GAME CONSOLE ENERGY EFFICIENCY STUDY.

    (a) Initial Study.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy (referred to in 
        this section as the ``Secretary'') shall conduct a study of--
                    (A) video game console energy use; and
                    (B) opportunities for energy savings regarding that 
                energy use.
            (2) Inclusions.--The study under paragraph (1) shall 
        include an assessment of all power consuming modes and media 
        playback modes.
    (b) Action on Completion.--On completion of the initial study under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, by regulation, whether 
minimum energy efficiency standards for video game console energy use 
should be established.
    (c) Follow-Up Study.--If the Secretary determines under subsection 
(b) that standards should not be established, not later than 3 years 
after the date of completion of the determination, the Secretary shall 
conduct a follow-up study.
    (d) Effect of Section.--Nothing in this section prohibits a State 
from establishing an energy efficiency standard for video game console 
energy use before the date on which such a standard, if any, is 
established by the Secretary pursuant to this section.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Edward Douglas Halper, a Suspended Attorney.

Motion to confirm the report of the Hearing Panel and deny the application for reinstatement granted; and cross-motion to disaffirm the Hearing Panel’s report, and to reinstate petitioner denied in its entirety. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.
Certification Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Casey Forward, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, of Globetech Ventures Corp.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 31, 2006



Casey Forward

______________________

Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wallace Mountain Resources Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Gelfand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
31st day of July, 2006.


/s/ Robert Gelfand
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350,


Chapter
      63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
      (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
      undersigned officer of Smart Balance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the
      “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained
      in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                November 6, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Alan S. GeverAlan
                S. GeverExecutive
                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                financial officer of Registrant)
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 84 (Monday, May 2, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 26178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10011]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2015-1649; Airspace Docket No. 15-AGL-6]

Proposed Amendment of Class D Airspace and Revocation of Class E 
Airspace; Columbus, Ohio State University Airport, OH, and Amendment of 
Class E Airspace; Columbus, OH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the NPRM published in the Federal 
Register on June 24, 2015, proposing to amend Class D and Class E 
airspace and remove Class E airspace in the Columbus, OH, area. The FAA 
has determined that withdrawal of that NPRM is warranted as a second 
NPRM for the same airspace action was issued in July 2015.

DATES: May 2, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101 
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5711.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An NPRM was published in the Federal 
Register of June 24, 2015 (80 FR 36265), to amend Title 14 Code of 
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71, by amending Class D and Class E 
airspace and removing Class E airspace in the Columbus, OH area. The 
proposed action was due to the decommissioning of the Dan Scott non-
directional beacon (NDB) and cancellation of the NDB approach at Ohio 
State University Airport, Columbus, OH. A second NPRM was published in 
the Federal Register of July 17, 2015 (80 FR 42434), proposing the same 
airspace actions and followed by a final rule published in the Federal 
Register of October 20, 2015 (80 FR 63426), acknowledging only the 
second NPRM. Therefore, the first NPRM issued is being withdrawn.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Withdrawal

    In consideration of the foregoing, the NPRM for FR Doc. FAA-2015-
1649, Airspace Docket No. 15-AGL-6, as published in the Federal 
Register of June 24, 2015 (80 FR 36265) (FR Doc. 2015-15461), is hereby 
withdrawn.

     Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 
10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on April 19, 2016.
Walter Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2016-10011 Filed 4-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```