Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2012 / Notices 13263 

Library of Medicine’s Docline. 

Information provided in these requests 

include the name, address, and 

telephone number of the party 

requesting the material, and depending 

on the method of delivery of the 

material to the party, may include either 

a fax number, email address, or Ariel IP 

address. The requestor must also 

provide a statement acknowledging 

copyright compliance, bibliographic 

information for the material they are 

requesting, and the maximum dollar 

amount they are willing to pay for the 

material. The collected information is 

used to deliver the material to the 

requesting party, bill for and track 

payment of applicable fees, monitor the 

return to NAL of loaned material, 

identify and locate the requested 

material in NAL collections, and 

determine whether the requesting party 

consents to the fees charged by NAL. 

Estimate of Burden: Average 1.00 

minute per response. 

Description of Respondents: 

Respondents to the collection of 

information are those libraries, 

institutions, or organizations that 

request interlibrary loans or copies of 

material in the NAL collections. Each 

respondent must furnish the 

information for each loan or copying 

request. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

1,350. 

Frequency of Responses: Average 9 

per respondent. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 203 hours. 

Comments: Comments are invited on 

(a) whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information will have a practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of the burden of the proposed collection 

of information, including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used; 

(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, 

and clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond, such as 

through the use of appropriate 

automated, electronic, mechanical, or 

other technological collection 

techniques. Comments may be sent to 

the address in the preamble. All 

responses to this notice will be 

summarized and included in the request 

for OMB approval. All comments will 

also become a matter of public record. 

Dated: February 10, 2012. 

Edward Knipling, 

Administrator, Agricultural Research Service. 

[FR Doc. 2012–5432 Filed 3–5–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–03–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Natural Resources Conservation 

Service 

Withdrawal of Notice of Intent To 

Prepare an Environmental Impact 

Statement for the Upper Deckers Creek 

Watershed, Preston County, WV 

AGENCY: Natural Resources 

Conservation Service. 

ACTION: Withdrawal of Notice of Intent 

to prepare an EIS. 

SUMMARY: In the Monday, November 21, 

2011, Federal Register, Vol. 76. No. 224, 

the Natural Resources Conservation 

Service (NRCS) announced its intension 

to prepare an Environmental Impact 

Statement (EIS) for the rehabilitation of 

the Upper Deckers Creek Site 1, in 

Preston County, West Virginia. 

Preparation of an EIS is no longer 

planned at this time. 

The purpose of the project is to bring 

the dam up to current dam safety 

standards. NRCS policy requires that an 

EIS be prepared for watershed project 

activities that include stream channel 

realignment, increases in channel 

capacity, or projects that require 

congressional action or that have the 

potential to significantly affect the 

quality of the human environment. 

Upon review, it now appears that none 

of these conditions apply to the Upper 

Deckers Creek Site 1 dam rehabilitation 

project. Therefore, NRCS is withdrawing 

its Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kevin Wickey, State Conservationist, 

Natural Resources Conservation Service, 

1550 Earl Core Road, Suite 200, 

Morgantown, West Virginia 26505. 

Telephone: (304) 284–7545. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

project involves the rehabilitation of the 

Upper Deckers Creek Site 1 dam and 

impoundment to meet current design 

criteria and performance standards. The 

Site 1 dam, located about 1.5 miles 

northwest of Arthurdale, WV, was 

constructed in 1969 as a single purpose 

flood control structure. Alternatives 

under consideration include the 

addition of rural raw water supply as a 

project purpose and increasing the 

reservoir volume, evaluating other raw 

water supply sources, raising the top of 

the dam elevation, flattening upstream 

and downstream face of the dam to 

improve slope stability, installing an 

internal drainage system in the dam, 

constructing a new auxiliary spillway, 

and constructing a new principal 

spillway riser structure. In addition to 

these structural alternatives, a no-action 

and a decommissioning alternative will 

be evaluated. 

A draft Plan-Environmental 

Assessment will be prepared and 

circulated for review by agencies and 

the public. The Natural Resources 

Conservation Service invites 

participation and consultation of 

agencies and individuals that have 

special expertise, legal jurisdiction, or 

interest in the preparation of the draft 

environmental assessment. Comments 

received, including the names and 

addresses of those who comment, will 

be considered part of the public record 

for this proposal. As a result of the 

process, if it is determined that the 

project may have significant impacts, 

the EIS process will be reinitiated and 

a NOI published. Further information 

on the proposed action may be obtained 

from Kevin Wickey, State 

Conservationist, at the above address or 

telephone (304–284–7545). 

Dated: February 24, 2012. 

Kevin Wickey, 

State Conservationist. 

(This activity is listed in the Catalog of 

Federal Domestic Assistance under No. 

10.904—Watershed Protection and Flood 

Prevention—and is subject to the provisions 

of Executive Order 12372, which requires 

intergovernmental consultation with State 

and local officials.) 

[FR Doc. 2012–5429 Filed 3–5–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–16–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Docket 48–2011] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 109 — Watertown, 

NY; Amendment to Application; North 

American Tapes, LLC (Textile Athletic 

Tape), Watertown, NY 

A request has been submitted to the 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) 

by the Jefferson County Industrial 

Development Authority (JCIDA), grantee 

of FTZ 109, to amend its application 

requesting authority on behalf of North 

American Tapes (NAT), to manufacture 

athletic tape under FTZ procedures 

within FTZ 109. The application was 

docketed under docket number 48–2011 

on July 15, 2011 (76 FR 43259, 7–20– 

2011). 

The NAT facility (25 employees) is 

located within FTZ 109 at 22430 Fisher 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
13264 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2012 / Notices 

1See Notice of Amendment of Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Preserved 

Mushrooms From the People’s Republic of China, 

64 FR 8308 (February 19, 1999) (‘‘the Order’’). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 76 FR 5559 

(February 1, 2011). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 

Request for Revocation in Part, and Deferral of 

Administrative Review, 76 FR 17825 (March 31, 

2011) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

Road in the Jefferson County Industrial 

Park (Site 1). The facility is used to 

produce pressure-sensitive adhesive 

athletic tape with textile fabric backing 

material for the U.S. market and export. 

JCIDA has now amended the 

application to provide updated and 

corrected information regarding the 

domestic availability and technical 

specifications of the textile fabric that 

would be used as an input to NAT’s 

manufacturing process. 

Public comment on the amended 

application is invited from interested 

parties. Submissions (original and 3 

copies) shall be addressed to the Board’s 

Executive Secretary at the following 

address: Office of the Executive 

Secretary, Room 2111, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230–0002. The 

closing period for receipt of comments 

is April 5, 2012. Rebuttal comments in 

response to material submitted during 

the foregoing period may be submitted 

during the subsequent 15-day period to 

April 20, 2012. 

A copy of the amended application 

will be available for public inspection at 

the Office of the Foreign-Trade Zones 

Board’s Executive Secretary at the 

address listed above and in the 

‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s 

Web site, which is accessible via 

www.trade.gov/ftz. For further 

information, contact Pierre Duy at or 

(202) 482–1378. 

Dated: February 29, 2012. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–5418 Filed 3–5–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–851] 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms From 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, and 

Rescission in Part 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce 

DATES: Effective Date: March 6, 2012. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) is currently 

conducting an administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the 

period February 1, 2010, through 

January 31, 2011. We preliminarily 

determine that sales made by Blue Field 

(Sichuan) Food Industrial Co., Ltd. 

(Blue Field), and Dujiangyan Xingda 

Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. (Xingda) were made 

below normal value (‘‘NV’’). We invite 

interested parties to comment on these 

preliminary results. In addition, we are 

also rescinding this administrative 

review with respect to China National 

Cereals, Oils & Foodstuffs Import & 

Export Corp. (China National), China 

Processed Food Import & Export Co. 

(China Processed), Fujian Pinghe 

Baofeng Canned Foods (Fujian Pinghe), 

Fujian Yuxing Fruits and Vegetables 

Foodstufs Development Co., Ltd. (Fujian 

Yuxing), Fujian Zishan Group Co., Ltd. 

(Fujian Zishan), Guangxi Eastwing 

Trading Co., Ltd. (Guangxi Eastwing), 

Guangxi Hengyong Industrial & 

Commercial Dev. Ltd. (Guangxi 

Hengyong), Guangxi Jisheng Foods, Inc. 

(Jisheng), Linyi City Kangfu Foodstuff 

Drinkable Co.Ltd. (Linyi City), Longhai 

Guangfa Food Co., Ltd.(Longhai 

Guangfa), Primera Harvest (Xingfan) Co., 

Ltd. (Primera Harvest), Shandong 

Fengyu Edible Fungus Corporation Ltd. 

(Shangdong Fengyu), Sun Wave Trading 

Co., Ltd. (Sun Wave Trading), Xiamen 

Greenland Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

(Xiamen Greenland), Xiamen Gulong 

Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Xiamen 

Gulong), Xiamen Jiahua Import & Export 

Trading Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Jiahua), 

Xiamen International Trade & Industrial 

Co., Ltd. (XITIC), Xiamen Longhuai 

Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Xiamen 

Longhuai), Zhangzhou Ganchang Foods 

Co., Ltd. (Zhangzhou Ganchang), 

Zhangzhou Hongda Import & Export 

Trading Co., Ltd. (Zhangzhou Hongda), 

and Zhangzhou Tongfa Foods Industry 

Co., Ltd. (Zhangzhou Tongfa). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael J. Heaney, or Robert James, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4475 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 19, 1999, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms (‘‘mushrooms’’) 

from the PRC.1 On February 1, 2011, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register its notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on mushrooms 

from the PRC.2 On February 25, 2011, 

Ayecue (Liaocheng) Foodstuff Co.,Ltd. 

(Ayecue) filed a request for review. On 

February 28, 2011, Blue Field also filed 

a review request. Finally, on February 

28, 2011, Petitioner, Monterey 

Mushrooms, Inc., requested reviews for 

the following exporters: (1) Ayecue, (2) 

Blue Field, (3) China National, (4) China 

Processed, (5) Dujiangyan Xingda 

Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. (Xingda), (6) Fujian 

Golden Banyan Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. 

(Golden Banyan), (7) Fujian Pinghe, (8) 

Fujian Yuxing, (9) Fujian Zishan, (10) 

Guangxi Eastwing, (11) Guangxi 

Hengyong, (12) Jisheng, (13) Linyi City, 

(14) Longhai Guangfa, (15) Primera 

Harvest, (16) Shandong Fengyu, (17) 

Shandong Jiufa, (18) Sun Wave Trading, 

(19) Xiamen Greenland, (20) Xiamen 

Gulong, (21) XITIC, (22) Xiamen Jiahua, 

(23) XITIC, (24) Xiamen Longhuai, (25) 

Zhangzhou Ganchang, Ltd. (Zhangzhou 

Ganchang), (26) Zhangzhou Golden 

Banyan Foodstuffs Industrial Co., Ltd. 

(Zhangzgou Golden), (27) Zhangzhou 

Hongda, (28) Zhangzhou Tongfa Foods 

Industry Co., Ltd., (Zhangzhou Tongfa) 

and (29) Zhejiang Iceman Food Co., Ltd 

(Zhejiang Iceman). On March 31 2011, 

the Department published in the 

Federal Register a notice of initiation of 

the antidumping duty administrative 

review of mushrooms from the PRC for 

the period February 1, 2010, through 

January 31, 2011, with respect to the 28 

companies named in the review 

requests specified above.3

On April 8, 2011, we received a 

separate rate certification from Ayecue. 

On April 28, 2010, we received a 

separate rate certification from Jisheng. 

On May 27, 2011, Shandong Jiufa 

submitted a separate rate certificaton. 

On May 31, 2011, Golden Banyan filed 

a separate rate certification. 

On June 27, 2011 the petitioner filed 

a letter withdrawing its request for Linyi 

City and for Zhangzhou Ganchang. 

Finally, on June 29, 2011, the petitioner 

filed a letter withdrawing its request for 

review of XITIC. As the review request 

was timely withdrawn for one of the 

exporters previously selected for 

examination (i.e., XITIC), the 

Department selected an additional 

exporter for individual examination in 

this administrative review according to 

the methodology specified below. 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES