alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J. 

demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth 

Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). 

Having considered petitioner's arguments and the 

documentation before this court, we conclude that our intervention by 

extraordinary writ relief is not warranted. See NRAP 21(b)(1); NRS 

34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. 

at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

J. 

Hardesty 

Douglas 

cc: Hon. Kenneth E. Pollock, District Judge 

Prestige Law Group 

Goodsell & Olsen 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1047A
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 12721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5270]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2012 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 12721]]

                Memorandum of February 27, 2012

                
Delegation of Reporting Function Specified In 
                Section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
                for Fiscal Year 2012

                Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense [and] the 
                Secretary of Energy

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 301 of title 3 of the United 
                States Code, I hereby delegate to you the reporting 
                function conferred upon the President by section 1043 
                of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
                Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81).

                The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed to 
                publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, February 27, 2012

[FR Doc. 2012-5270
Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
Billing code 5000-04-P
```

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paramount Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I J. Jay
Lobell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:  /s/ J. Jay Lobell                                    Dated: August 15, 2006
     -----------------
         J. Jay Lobell
         Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
         (Principal Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer)
```
EXHIBIT
32.2




AULTRA
GOLD INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Aultra Gold Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rauno Perttu, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company  and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Date: November
      14, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Rauno
      PerttuRauno
      PerttuChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
31.1




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Chapter
63, Title 18 USC Section 1350 (A) and (B)





I, George
J. Coates, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Coates International,
Ltd.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
evaluated the effectiveness of registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):




a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and




b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




April
      11, 2008
            By:
            /s/George
      J. CoatesGeorge
      J. CoatesPrincipal
      Executive Officer
EX-10.2



 





Exhibit 10.2




Schedule of Outside Director Fees

(as of January 1, 2007)




     Beginning on January 1, 2007, fees for non-employee members of the Company’s Board of
Directors will be as follows:




	 	•	 	an annual retainer of $50,000 for service on the Board of Directors, 35%
of which is payable in restricted shares of the Company’s common stock issued on the
first day of January each year, which shares shall be fully vested immediately but not
tradable in the public markets for one year, and 65% of which is payable in cash
quarterly;
	 
	 	•	 	the Audit Committee Chairman shall receive an additional annual retainer of $8,000,
payable in cash quarterly;
	 
	 	•	 	the Compensation Committee Chairman shall receive an additional annual
retainer of $6,000, payable in cash quarterly;
	 
	 	•	 	the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman shall receive
an additional annual retainer of $4,000, payable in cash quarterly; and
	 
	 	•	 	each board member shall be reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with his or her attendance at a board or committee
meeting.





7
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 24.7
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint
Lionel Reilly, or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my
name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL
VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2001, to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 with respect to the registration of the common stock of Professional
Veterinary Products, Ltd., and generally to do and perform all things necessary
to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could
do if personally present.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2/nd/ day of
October, 2001.

                                                /s/ Mark A. Basinger



STATE OF OHIO                             )
                                          )     ss.
COUNTY OF PUTNAM                          )


         On this 2/nd/ day of October, 2001, before me, a Notary Public
qualified for said County, personally came Mark A. Basinger, known to me to be
the identical person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the
execution thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.



                                                /s/ Tony J. Schroeder
                                                Notary Public

                                                My commission expires:
                                                August 31, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Charles J. Schreiber Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.

Date: May 4, 2006



/s/    CHARLES J. SCHREIBER,
JR.Charles J. Schreiber Jr.Chairman of the Board,Chief Executive Officer and Director
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 10760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Chairpersons, Boards of Scientific Counselors for Institutes and 
Centers at the National Institutes of Health, Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a meeting scheduled by the Deputy 
Director for Intramural Research at the National Institutes of Health 
(NIH) with the Chairpersons of the Boards of Scientific Counselors. The 
Boards of Scientific Counselors are advisory groups to the Scientific 
Directors of the Intramural Research Programs at the NIH. This meeting 
will take place on March 2, 2012, from 10 am to 2 pm, at the NIH, 1 
Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, Building 1, Room 151. The meeting will 
include a discussion of policies and procedures that apply to the 
regular review of NIH intramural scientists and their work.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Mr. Joe Kleinman at the Office of 
Intramural Research, NIH, Building 1, Room 160, Tel. (301) 496-1921, 
Fax (301) 402-4273, or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#761d1a131f181b17181c361b171f1a58181f1e58111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3853545d515655595652785559515416565150165f574e">[email protected]</span></a> in advance of the 
meeting.

    Dated: February 16, 2012.
Lawrence Tabak,
Deputy Director, NIH.
[FR Doc. 2012-4210 Filed 2-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7684

RAYMOND V. BETHEL, JR.,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VA,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:13-cv-00013-HEH)

Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond V. Bethel, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

For the second time, Raymond V. Bethel, Jr., seeks to 

appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition for failure to exhaust 

state court remedies. As our previous decision in No. 13-7615 

dismissed Bethel’s appeal from the same order and judgment, we 

dismiss the present appeal as duplicative. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Title 129 - Department of Environmental Quality

Chapter 32

Effective Date 12/15/98 (Rev. 6/26/94)

Chapter 32 - DUST; DUTY TO PREVENT ESCAPE OF 

001 Handling, Transportation, Storing. No person may cause or permit the handling, transporting 

or storage of any material in a manner which may allow particulate matter to become airborne in 

such quantities and concentrations that it remains visible in the ambient air beyond the premises 

where it originates. 

002 Construction, Use, Repair, Demolition. No person may cause or permit a building or its 

appurtenances or a road, or a driveway, or an open area to be constructed, used, repaired or 

demolished without applying all such reasonable measures to prevent particulate matter from 

becoming airborne so that it remains visible beyond the premises where it originates. The 

Director may require such reasonable measures as may be necessary to prevent particulate matter 

from becoming airborne, including but not limited to paving or frequent cleaning of roads, 

driveways and parking lots; application of dust-free surfaces; application of water; and the 

planting and maintenance of vegetative ground cover. 

003 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, the Department shall not regulate 

emissions from normal farming practices, on-farm crop drying and handling, and animal feeding 

activities, provided that reasonable and practical measures to limit particulate matter from such 

sources are utilized.

Enabling Legislation: Neb. Rev. Stat. §§81-1504(1)(2); 81-1505(12) 

Legal Citation: Title 129, Ch. 32, Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality 

www.DEQ.state.NE.US Home Page Security, Privacy & Accessibility Policy Nebraska.gov

Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality

1200 "N" Street, Suite 400

P.O. Box 98922

Lincoln, Nebraska 68509

(402) 471-2186
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




FIRST AMENDMENT TO COOPER INDUSTRIES PLC

AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

(As Amended and Restated September 8, 2009)




     WHEREAS, the Cooper Industries plc Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)
provides for awards of ordinary shares of Cooper Industries plc (“Cooper”) to certain employees of
Cooper US Inc. (the “Company”) and its affiliates; and



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has approved amending the Plan provisions to provide for the
continued participation in the Plan of certain participants who are employed by Cooper subsidiaries
that may be contributed to a joint venture involving Cooper’s Tools business.



     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of February 13, 2010, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:




	 	1.	 	Section 2.1 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
	 
	 	 	 	2.1 “Affiliate” shall mean any employer, present and future, with which the Company is
considered a single employer under Section 414(b) and 414(c) of the Code. In addition,
an “Affiliate” shall include entities that are part of a joint venture involving
Cooper’s Tools business, provided that the equity interest held by Cooper or its
subsidiaries in the joint venture is at least 20%.
	 
	 	2.	 	Article XXVIII shall be added to the Plan as follows:





XXVIII Awards to Cooper Joint Venture Participants





	 	 	 	A “Cooper Joint Venture Participant” means a Participant in the Plan who is an employee
of a subsidiary, which Cooper contributes to the joint venture that involves Cooper’s
Tools business or whose employment is otherwise transferred to an entity that is part of
such joint venture. Upon contribution by Cooper of its Tools business to the joint
venture, no further Awards under the Plan shall be granted to a Cooper Joint Venture
Participant, but a Cooper Joint Venture Participant shall continue to be eligible to
vest in and earn Awards granted on or after the effective date of this amendment subject
to the terms, conditions and restrictions set forth in the Plan and Award Agreement,
including provisions relating to Separation from Service. Upon contribution by Cooper
of its Tools business to the joint venture, a Cooper Joint Venture Participant shall
incur a Separation from Service with respect to outstanding Awards that were granted
before the effective date of this amendment, subject to the discretion of the Committee
to amend, waive or modify the conditions or other terms of such Awards pursuant to
Section 3.2 and Article XII of the Plan.
Exhibit
      32.4


**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FNANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the amended Quarterly report of Frezer, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in
      the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      August 18, 2006




By:
            /s/
                David
                KoosDavid
                KoosActing
                Chief Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
      adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
      of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Frezer,
      Inc. and will be retained by Frezer, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Frank J. CRIMMINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 26, Docket 74-1289.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Sept. 9, 1974.

Decided Oct. 8, 1974.

Donald Stuart Bab, New York City (Seymour Swidler, William J. Burke and Spear & Hill, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

John J. Loflin, New York City (Lord, Day & Lord, New York City, on *the*brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before SMITH, TIMBERS and GURFEIN,* Circuit Judges.

*

 At the time of oral argument, Judge Gur-fein was a District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM :

Frank J. Crimmins, a former registered representative of Walston & Co., Inc., which in turn was a member firm of the American Stock Exchange, appeals from a judgment entered December 18, 1973 in the Southern District of New York, Morris E. Lasker, *District Judge,*denying Crimmins’ motion for summary judgment, granting the Exchange’s cross-motion for summary judgment and dismissing Crimmins’ action to vacate the determination by a disciplinary panel of the American Stock Exchange, acting pursuant to Section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78f (1970), which found Crimmins guilty of violations of the Exchange rules in connection with trading in the stock of Four Seasons Nursing Centers of America, Inc., and suspended him for two years.

We have carefully considered each of Crimmins’ claims of error and find them to be without merit. We affirm on the comprehensive, well-reasoned opinion of Judge Lasker below. 368 F.Supp. 270 (S.D.N.Y.1973).

Affirmed.