2005 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 8-29-2005 

# P arip ovic v . Atty Ge n U SA P r e c e de nt i al or N on-P r e c e de nt i al : P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 03-4193

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi ll a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e and ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a nova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2005 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a nova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C arl s on@l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " P ar ipovic v

. Atty Ge n U SA" (2005). 2005 D e cisio n s . P ape r 584. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005/584P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N o. 03- 4193 Z E L JK O P A R IP O V IC

Pet i t i oner v. * AL BE RT O R . GONZ AL E S , AT T OR NE Y GE NE RA L OF T HE UNI T E D S T AT E S OF AM E RI CA , R es pondent * Su bs t i tut e d p ur s ua ntt o Rul e 43 c , F. R. A . P. O n A p p ea l from an O rde r en tered b ef o re T h e B o a rd o f

Im m ig ra tio n A p p e a ls ( N o. A 72- 780- 152) A r gued D ece m ber13, 2004 B efor e: A M B R O , V A N A N T W E R PE N and ST A PL E T O N , C i r cui tJ udges

( O pi ni on fi l ed A ugus t12, 2005) Suni tK . J os hi , E s qui r e ( A r gued) S o k o l B rah a, E sq u ir e J o s h i & A s s o c i a t e s , P . C. 225 B r oadw ay , Sui t e 705 N ew Y or k, N Y 10007 A t t or ney s forPet i t i oner Pet erD . K ei s l er A s s i s t antA t t or neyG ener al C i vi l D i vi s i on R i char d M . E vansA s s i s t antD i r ect or

D o u g las G insb u rg, E sq u ir e Jo h n D . W il li am s, E sq u ir e D avi d E . D auenhe i m er , E s qui r e ( A r gued) U ni t ed St at es D epart m entof J us t i ce O ffi ce of I m m i gr at i on L i t i gat i on P. O . B ox 878, B en Fr ankl i n St at i on W as hi ngt on, D . C . 20044 A t t or ney s forR es pondent

OR DE R A M E ND I NG P UB L I S HE D O P I NI ON A M B R O , C i r cui tJudge

I T I S N O W O R D E R E D t hatt he publ i s hed O pi ni on i n t he above cas e fi l ed A ug ust12 , 20 05 , be am end ed as fo l l ow s:

O n page 7, r epl ace t he ent i r e par agr aph i n t he mi ddl e of the page begi nni ng “B eca us e Par i povi c’ s depor t at i on . . . ( Sept . 30, 1996) . ”, w i t h t he fol l ow i ng:

A t th e tim e P a rip o v ic’ s p e tit io n f o r re v iew (w h ich re late s to depor t at i on pr ocee di ngs begun pr i ort o A pr i l 1, 1997) w as fi l ed, ourj ur i s di ct i on ar os e fr om t he form erI m m i gr at i on and N at i onal i t yA ct( “I N A ”) § 106( a) and w as governed byt he “tr ans i t i onal rul es ” of § 309( c) of the I l l egal I m m i gr at i on Re f o r m a n d I mmi g r a n tRe s p o n s i b i l i t yActo f 1 9 9 6 , Pu b . L. N o. 104- 208, 110 St at . 3009 ( Sept . 30, 1996) . O n M ay11, 20 05 , C on gress enacted T he R E A L ID A ct , w hich provides, in tera lia , t hata “pe t i t i on forr evi ew fi l ed underfor m er s ect i on 106( a) of the I m m i gr at i on and N at i onal i t yA ct

. . . s hal l be tr eat ed as i f i thad bee n fi l ed as a pet i t i on for r evi ew under[8 U . S. C . § 1252] , as amended byt hi s s ect i on. ” R E A L ID A c t § 1 0 6 (d ), 1 1 9 S ta t. 3 1 0 -3 1 1 (M a y1 1 , 2 0 0 5 ). T hus , ourj ur i s di ct i on now ar i s es under8 U . S. C . § 1252, as a m e n d e d b yT h e R E A L ID A c t. Cf . E l i a v. G onz al es , __ F. 3d

__ , 2 0 0 5 W L 1 9 0 3 7 2 3 at *3 (6th C ir . Ju ly2 2 , 2 0 0 5 ). B yth e C o u rt, / s /T hom as L . A m br o, C i r cui tJ udge D at ed: A ugus t29, 2005