alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Sheridan Garner [sgarner@,localnet.com] 

Seot: 

To: -. ~t "t ~~~ 

,·Saturday, February 13, 20103:35 PM 

.Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Subject: airlines at Plattsburgh International Airport 

" " ' .r· . 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

I am writing regafding the recent vote by the Clinton County Legislature to endorse Colgan Air as the Essential Air Service 

for Plattsburgh"lnU~'rnational Airport. I believe this choice to be ill advised for several reasons. First of all safety. In light of . 

the information regarding the crash of flight 3407 I personally would not feel safe flying Colgan Air any time soon. I would 

certainly be finding an alternate method of transportation to Boston if the need arose. 

Secondly, Cape Air; while small.er planes, offer more frequent flights. 

Cape Air 21 weekly(28 during the summer) versus Colgan's 12. Which do you think offers more flexibility for making 

connections or for frequent business travelers? Cape Air also gave a a price guarantee of $65 one-way, while Colgan has 

a target price of $75 to $125. Any guesses what the price will really be? Will there be more canceled flights if their planes 

are not filled? 

Lastly, The taxpayers will again be as.ked to foot the bill with a 59% higher subsidy for Colgan than for Cape Air. 

I urge you to consider these.1actors when making your decision and 

choose Cape Air. . 

Thank you, 

Peggy Garner 

336 Irish Settlement Road 

Plattsburgh, NY 12901 

1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


            We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in the  Registration
Statement  (No.  333-06705)  on Form S-8 of our report dated August 20, 1999 for
the years ended June 30,  1997,  1998 and 1999,  and to the addition of our firm
under the  caption  "Experts"  in the  Prospectus,  insofar as it relates to our
report on the financial statements for the three years ended June 30, 1999.


                                        /s/ Margolin, Winer & Evens LLP
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Margolin, Winer & Evens LLP


Garden City, New York
September 28, 1999
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350,


Chapter
      63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
      (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
      undersigned officer of Smart Balance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “Form
      10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in
      the
      Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                May 9, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Stephen B. HughesStephen
                B. HughesChairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                executive officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1b

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'



The Board of Directors
UroQuest Medical Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-32725) on Form S-8 of UroQuest Medical Corporation of our report dated
February 10, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of UroQuest
Medical Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report
appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of UroQuest Medical
Corporation.


                                   /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Salt Lake City, Utah
March 30, 1998
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C
.

Safer Medical ofMontana and

George Ackerson Complainants,


### v. City ofFort Benton, Montana and

Chouteau County, Montana Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### FAA Docket No. 16

- 15

- 12



### NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally

- AssistedAirport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, Part 16, subpart B, the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to December 11, 2016. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

in C. Willis, Director 1ce ofAirport Compliance d Management Analysis

# Ol'5o**~** 1 1 

# Z OIC, Date 

## I2 

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 6, 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (ftrst class, postage paid) or personally delivered a true copy ofthe foregoing Order addressed to:
Counsel for Complainants Adrian Miller HOLLAND & HART LLP 40 1 North 31st Street Suite 1500 Billings, Montana 59101 aamiller@hollandhart.com Counsel for Respondent City Brian Lilletvedt BOSCH, KUHR, DUGDALE, MARTIN, & KAZE, PLLP 335 Fourth Avenue P.O. Box 7152 Havre, Montana 59501 blilletvedt@bkdlaw.org Counsel for Respondent County Mitchell A. Young MONT ANA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES Defense Services 2717 Skyway Drive, Suite F Helena, Montana 59602 myoung@mtcounties.org
Hand-Delivered to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) FAA Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis (AC0-100)

laudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1775 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide that interest shall 

not accrue on Federal Direct Loans for members of the Armed Forces 

on active duty regardless of the date of disbursement. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 13, 2009 

Mr. BAYH (for himself, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. BENNET, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. 

INHOFE, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. 

SCHUMER, Mr. SPECTER, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. 

BINGAMAN, and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide 

that interest shall not accrue on Federal Direct Loans 

for members of the Armed Forces on active duty regardless of the date of disbursement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Servicemember Stu5 dent Loan Interest Relief Act’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1775 IS

1 SEC. 2. NO ACCRUAL OF INTEREST FOR MEMBERS OF THE 

2 ARMED FORCES ON ACTIVE DUTY. 

3 Section 455(o) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

4 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(o)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (4)’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘paragraph (3)’’; and 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘for which the first dis9 bursement is made on or after October 1, 

10 2008’’; 

11 (2) by striking paragraph (2); and 

12 (3) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as 

13 paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### Bidermann Industries Licensing, Inc., et al., Respondents, v Avmar N.V. et al., Appellants.

Order and judgment *402(one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.) entered January 23, 1991, which granted the motion to stay arbitration of the issue of whether petitioner’s attorneys should be disqualified from representing it in arbitration proceedings, with leave to apply to the court for a ruling on the merits of the disqualification issue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this dispute concerning certain licensing agreements, respondents have sought to disqualify Bidermann Industries’ attorneys on grounds that the attorneys ought to be called as witnesses due to their involvement in the underlying events and that the attorneys received confidential information pertaining to respondent Lagerfeld in the course of representing him in a related 1985 transaction. The Supreme Court properly stayed arbitration of the disqualification issue, as such matter is intertwined with overriding public policy considerations *(Matter of Aimcee Wholesale Corp. [Tomar Prods.],*21 NY2d 621; *Garrity v Lyle Stuart, Inc.,*40 NY2d 354; *Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg]*46 NY2d 623, 630-632). We have held matters of attorney discipline are beyond the jurisdiction of arbitrators *(Matter of Erdheim [Selkowe]*51 AD2d 705). Issues of attorney disqualification similarly involve interpretation and application of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Disciplinary Rules, as well as the potential deprivation of counsel of the client’s choosing *(Matter of Abrams [John Anonymous]*62 NY2d 183, 196; *S & S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v 777 S. H. Corp.,*69 NY2d 437, 443), and cannot be left to the determination of arbitrators selected by the parties themselves for their expertise in the particular industries engaged in. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5063]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-1153-000]


Bounce Energy NY, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Bounce Energy NY, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is March 19, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#97d1d2c5d4d8f9fbfef9f2c4e2e7e7f8e5e3d7f1f2e5f4b9f0f8e1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="60262532232f0e0c090e05331510100f121420060512034e070f16">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: February 27, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5063 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ALEX AND KIRA CHARLTON,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF G.C., A MINOR,

Petitioners

v.

STEVEN M. TROY, D.O., HAN OB

- GYN ASSOCIATES OF DELAWARE COUNTY,

HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK,

DELAWARE COUNTY MEMORIAL

HOSPITAL AND CROZER

- KEYSTONE HEALTH SYSTEM,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 587 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ALEX AND KIRA CHARLTON,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF G.C., A MINOR,

Petitioners

v.

STEVEN M. TROY, D.O., HAN OB

- GYN ASSOCIATES OF DELAWARE COUNTY, HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK,

DELAWARE COUNTY MEMORIAL

HOSPITAL AND CROZER

- KEYSTONE HEALTH SYSTEM,

Res pondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 588 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER[ 587 MAL 2020 and 588 MAL 2020 ]

- 2

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of March, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Additionally, Pennsylvania Association of Justice’s Application of Amicus Curiae

for Leave to File Statement in Support of Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED

.
----

----

II Akty, ktorých uverejnenie nie je povinné

Komisia

----

ROZHODNUTIE č. 202

zo 17. marca 2005

o vzorových tlačivách potrebných na uplatňovanie nariadení Rady (EHS) č. 1408/71 a (EHS) č. 574/72 (E 001, E 101, E 102, E 103, E 104, E 106, E 107, E 108, E 109, E 112, E 115, E 116, E 117, E 118, E 120, E 121, E 123, E 124, E 125, E 126 a E 127)

(Text s významom pre EHP a dohodu EÚ so Švajčiarskom)

(2006/203/ES)

SPRÁVNA KOMISIA PRE SOCIÁLNE ZABEZPEČENIE MIGRUJÚCICH PRACOVNÍKOV,

so zreteľom na článok 81 písm. a) nariadenia Rady (EHS) č. 1408/71 zo 14. júna 1971 o uplatňovaní systémov sociálneho zabezpečenia na zamestnancov, samostatne zárobkovo činné osoby a ich rodinných príslušníkov pohybujúcich sa v rámci Spoločenstva (1), podľa ktorého je povinnosťou správnej komisie riešiť všetky administratívne záležitosti vyplývajúce z nariadenia (EHS) č. 1408/71 a ďalších nariadení,

so zreteľom na článok 2 ods. 1 nariadenia Rady (EHS) č. 574/72 z 21. marca 1972, ktorým sa stanovuje postup pri vykonávaní nariadenia (EHS) č. 1408/71 o uplatňovaní systémov sociálneho zabezpečenia na zamestnancov a ich rodiny, ktorí sa pohybujú rámci Spoločenstva (2), podľa ktorého povinnosťou správnej komisie je navrhnúť vzory dokumentov potrebných na uplatňovanie nariadení,

so zreteľom na rozhodnutie č. 153 zo 7. októbra 1993 o vzorových tlačivách potrebných na uplatňovanie nariadení Rady (EHS) 1408/71 a (EHS) č. 574/72 (E 001, E 103 až E 127) (3),

so zreteľom na rozhodnutie č. 164 z 27. novembra 1996 o vzorových tlačivách potrebných na uplatňovanie nariadení Rady (EHS) 1408/71 a (EHS) č. 574/72 (E 101 a E 102) (4),

so zreteľom na rozhodnutie č. 166 z 2. októbra 1997 o zmene a doplnení tlačív E 106 a E 109 (5),

so zreteľom na rozhodnutie č. 168 z 11. júna 1998 o zmene a doplnení tlačív E 121 a E 127 a vyradení tlačiva E 122 (6),

so zreteľom na rozhodnutie č. 179 z 18. apríla 2000 o vzorových tlačivách potrebných na uplatňovanie nariadení Rady (EHS) č. 1408/71 a (EHS) č. 574/72 (E 111, E 111 B, E 113 až E 118 a E 125 až E 127) (7),

so zreteľom na rozhodnutie č. 185 z 27. júna 2002, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa rozhodnutie č. 153 zo 7. októbra 1993 (tlačivo E 108) (8),

so zreteľom na rozhodnutie č. 186 z 27. júna 2002 o vzorových tlačivách potrebných na uplatňovanie nariadení Rady (EHS) č. 1408/71 a (EHS) č. 574/72 (E 101) (9),

keďže:

ROZHODLA TAKTO:

Predseda správnej komisie

Claude EWEN

----

(1)Ú. v. ES L 149, 5.7.1971, s. 2. Nariadenie naposledy zmenené a doplnené nariadením Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 647/2005 (Ú. v. EÚ L 117, 4.5.2005, s. 1).

(2)Ú. v. ES L 74, 17.3.1972, s. 1. Nariadenie naposledy zmenené a doplnené nariadením (EHS) č. 647/2005.

(3)Ú. v. ES L 244, 19.9.1994, s. 22.

(4)Ú. v. ES L 216, 8.8.1997, s. 85.

(5)Ú. v. ES L 195, 11.7.1998, s. 25.

(6)Ú. v. ES L 195, 11.7.1998, s. 37.

(7)Ú. v. ES L 54, 25.2.2002, s. 1.

(8)Ú. v. ES L 55, 1.3.2003, s. 74.

(9)Ú. v. ES L 55, 1.3.2003, s. 80.

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----
Exhibit21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF TRANSPRO, INC.

Thefollowing sets forth a list of all the direct and indirect subsidiariesas of December 31, 2004 of Transpro, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the"Company"), and the State or otherjurisdiction of incorporation or organization ofeach.

|                                      |  |                                             |  |  |  |  |
|--------------------------------------|--|---------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Name                                 |  | JurisdictionofIncorporation or Organization |
| G&OManufacturing Company,Inc.(a) |  | Delaware                                    |
| GO/DANIndustries, Inc.               |  | Delaware                                    |
| Transpro, Inc. deMexico, SA de C.V.  |  | Mexico                                      |
| Radiadores GDI,S.A. de C.V.(b)       |  | Mexico                                      |
| ReadyAire,Inc.                       |  | Texas                                       |
|                                      |

|  |                          |
|--|--------------------------|
|  | (a)Sold on March 1, 2005 |

|  |                                     |
|--|-------------------------------------|
|  | (b)Currently an inactivesubsidiary. |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Restated Financial Data Schedule
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-2-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1996
<CASH>                                          29,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,183
<INVENTORY>                                      7,176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,328
<PP&E>                                       1,116,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                 218,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,063,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,135
<BONDS>                                        548,813
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,770
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           424
<OTHER-SE>                                     361,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,063,728
<SALES>                                         24,881
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               369,699
<CGS>                                           25,615
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  201,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,055
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,114
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                       761
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                809
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       809
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
# L_2006124EN.01002901.xml

| 11.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 124/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 124/29

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 10 May 2006

amending Decision 2005/380/EC establishing a group of non-governmental experts on corporate governance and company law

(2006/336/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Decision 2005/380/EC of 28 April 2005 establishing a group of non-governmental experts on corporate governance and company law (1), and in particular Articles 3 and 4 thereof,

Whereas:

A member of the group has resigned during his period of appointment. Therefore, the Commission should appoint a new member of the group,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr. Lajos Váradi is appointed member of the group of non-governmental experts on corporate governance and company law, as a replacement for Mr. Józef Okolski.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply until 27 April 2008.

Done at Brussels, 10 May 2006.

For the Commission

Charlie McCREEVY

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 40.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Red Rock Pictures Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  January 14, 2011/s/ Reno RolléReno Rollé,President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
<PAGE>

           Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Statement of Additional Information
and to the use of our reports dated February 27, 2006 with respect to the
financial statements of American Centurion Life Assurance Company and IDS Life
Insurance Company of New York (name subsequently changed to RiverSource Life
Insurance Co. of New York), January 2, 2007 with respect to the supplemental
financial statements of IDS Life Insurance Company of New York (name
subsequently changed to RiverSource Life Insurance Co. of New York), and March
31, 2006 with respect to the financial statements of ACL Variable Annuity
Account 2 (name subsequently changed to RiverSource of New York Variable
Annuity Account 2) included in the Initial Registration Statement on Form N-4
for the registration of the RiverSource Innovations(SM) Select Variable Annuity
offered by RiverSource Life Insurance Co. of New York.

                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                     Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 2, 2007