alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27110-27111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11095]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7872]

Notice of Meeting

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA), the Advisory Committee on the Secretary of State's 
Strategic Dialogue with Civil Society will convene in Washington, DC on 
May 16, 2012. The Committee provides advice on the formulation of U.S. 
policies, proposals, and strategies for engagement with, and protection 
of, civil society worldwide. The objective of this meeting is to

[[Page 27111]]

review the progress of the Committee's five subcommittees. The meeting 
is open to public participation through live stream at http://www.state.gov/s/sacsed/c47725.htm.

DATES: The meeting will be held on May 16, 2012, from 12:15 p.m. to 
1:45 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of State, 
2201 C Street NW., Washington, DC.
    Written comments may be submitted to Madeleine Ioannou via email to 
civilsociety@state.gov or facsimile to (202) 736-7880. All comments, 
including names and addresses when provided, are placed in the record 
and are available for inspection and copying. The public may inspect 
comments received at the U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., 
Room 1317, Washington, DC 20520. Please call ahead to (202) 736-7824 to 
facilitate entry into the building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeleine Ioannou, Committee Executive 
Secretary, U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street NW., Room 1317, 
Washington, DC 20520; (202) 736-7308; civilsociety@state.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public and will 
be streamed live at: http://www.state.gov/s/sacsed/c47725.htm. Agenda 
items to be covered include: (1) Introductions, (2) Presentations by 
the Chairs of the Subcommittees, (3) Discussion of any Public 
Submissions, (4) General Discussion, (5) Adjournment. Anyone who would 
like to bring related matters to the attention of the Committee may 
file written statements with the Committee staff by sending an email to 
civilsociety@state.gov.

    Dated: April 25, 2012.
Madeleine Ioannou,
Office of the Senior Advisor for Civil Society and Emerging 
Democracies, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-11095 Filed 5-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
ME lnventoryExpertService 

A division of the American Chemical Society Phone: 800-631-1884, 614-447-3870 

Fax; 614-447-3747 

E-mail: answers@cas.org 

Web: www.cas.orglproducts/other-cas-products/client-services/ 

INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT 

IES Order Number: 378763-2 

Registry Number: Not Registered 

c 

CA Index Na.me: 

~ ~~ 

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. 

F—I If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. 

Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA. 

CAS • 2540 Olentangy River Road - P.O. Box 3343 - Columbus, OH 43210-0334 • USA
Concurring memorandum opinion issued April 12, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 14
- 00925
- CR

——————————— EX PARTE TERRY LYNN SPIES , Appellant

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1343443
- A

CONCURRING MEMORANDUM OPINION I join the court’s holding that Terry Lynn Spies failed to preserve error on any legal argument that section 33.021(c) of the Texas Penal Code is unconstitutional as applied to him. Not only did Spies fail to present any substantive legal argument to the trial court, he also failed to present an adequate brief including a legal argument to this court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 33.1 , 38.1(i).2

For precisely that reason, I would not go further to address the merits of the constitutionality of section 33.021(c) by attempting to distinguish it from section 33.021(b) and the holdings in Ex parte Lo , 424 S.W.3d 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013), and Ex parte Chance , 439 S.W.3d 918 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (mem.)

. See VanDevender v. Woods , 222 S.W.3d 430, 433 (Tex. 2007) (noting “the cardinal principle of judicial restraint

— if it is not necessary to decide more, it is necessary not to decide more” )

.

Mic hael Massengale Justice Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kelly Leemont, Also Known as David Collins, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Howard Bell, J.), rendered on November 20, 1989, resentencing defendant, as a second felony offender, to consecutive indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 5 to 10 years on two counts of robbery in the first degree, unanimously affirmed.

On April 6, 1989, the defendant was sentenced, following a jury trial, as a persistent violent felon, to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 12 years to life on his convictions for robbery in the first degree. On appeal, this Court found that the defendant was not properly adjudicated a persistent violent felon, and ordered that the sentence be vacated and defendant be resentenced as a second felony offender or persistent felony offender (154 AD2d 277). The Court resentenced the defendant as a second felony offender imposing indeterminate terms of 5 to 10 years, but directed that these sentences run consecutively, where previously defendant had received concurrent terms. The imposition of consecutive sentences was not excessive, as the aggregate minimum period of incarceration (10 years) represented a reduction from the twelve year minimum originally imposed. Defendant’s contention in his *pro se*supplemental brief that he is entitled to have jail time credit applied to the sentence on each of his robbery counts, as opposed to the aggregate, is not reviewable on this appeal from the judgment of resentence *(People v Young,*161 AD2d 367). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin, Ross and Asch,. JJ.
***EXHIBIT 32(i)***

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the report on Form 10-QSB of Mistral Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, John Xinos, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all  material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at  the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of  the small business issuer for the period covered by this Report. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: November 12, 2007

 

/s/ John Xinos

John Xinos

Chief Executive Officer 

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

63

 

----
GMAC
Commercial Mortgage
550 California Street, 12th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel. 415 835 9200

Fax 415 391 2949

 

 

 

 

GMAC Commercial Mortgage Securities, Corp..

               Series 2002 C2

                                              Annual Statement as to Compliance

                                For Period of June 27, 2002 through December 31, 2002

 

 

Pursuant to Section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement I attest that:

A review of the activities of GMAC Commercial Mortgage as Special  Servicer during the period, and of its performance under this Agreement, has been made under my supervision.

To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, GMAC Commercial Mortgage as Special Servicer, has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under this Agreement throughout the period. However, during the period of June  27, 2002 through December 31, 2002, GMAC Commercial Mortgage as Special Servicer did not service any Specially Serviced Mortgaged Loans.

GMAC Commercial Mortgage as Special Servicer has received no notice  regarding qualifications, or challenging the status, of the Trust Fund as a REMIC or of the Grantor Trust as a "grantor trust" under the Grantor Trust Provisions from the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or body.

 

GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION

 
* 

 

 

By: *Michele Heisler     Date:     1/31/03
      Michele Heisler

      Vice President, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation

 

 

               481A	**
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

WR-62,426-04

EX PARTE JUAN CARLOS ALVAREZ

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 787007 IN THE 338 DISTRICT COURT

TH

HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., filed a concurring opinion in which JOHNSON and

NEWELL, JJ., joined. ALCALA, J., not participating.

O R D E R

This is a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the

provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071, § 5.

In September 1999, Applicant was convicted of the offense of capital murder. The

jury answered the special issues submitted under Article 37.071, TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.,

and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed Applicant’s

conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Alvarez v. State, No. AP-73,648 (Tex. Crim. App.

October 30, 2002). This Court denied relief on Applicant’s initial post-conviction
Alvarez - 2

application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Alvarez, No. WR-62,426-01 (Tex. Crim.

App. September 24, 2008). This Court dismissed Applicant’s second post-conviction

application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Alvarez, No. WR-62,426-02 (Tex. Crim.

App. Sept. 15, 2010). Applicant’s instant post-conviction application for writ of habeas

corpus, Ex parte Alvarez, No. WR-62,426-04, was received in this Court on November 5,

2014.

1

The record reflectsthat Applicant is currently challenging his conviction in Cause No.

4:09-cv-03040,styled Juan Carlos Alvarez v. Rick Thaler, in the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. The record also reflectsthat the federal

district court has entered an order staying its proceedings for Applicant to return to state court

to consider his current unexhausted claims. Therefore, this Court may consider this

subsequent state application. See Ex parte Soffar,143 S.W.3d 804 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).

Applicant presents eleven allegations in the instant application. We have reviewed

the application and find that Applicant has failed to satisfy the requirements of Article

11.071, § 5(a). Accordingly, we dismiss the application as an abuse of the writ without

considering the merits of the claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 29 DAY OF APRIL, 2015.

TH

Do Not Publish

 Ex parte Alvarez, No. WR-62,426-03, was a motion for leave to file a petition for writ 1

of mandamus. This Court denied leave to file on September 17, 2014.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.52 MB)

Tags:mrap, 386th air expeditionary wing, 386th Expeditionary Logistics Readiness Squadron 

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth Fund III, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Chad C. Braun, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of the General Partner
of the company, that, to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
 applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|      |              |       |                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|----- | ------------ | ----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: | May 14, 2010 | By:   | /s/ Chad C.
 Braun                                                                                                                                                                                   
|      |              | Name: | Chad C.
 Braun                                                                                                                                                                                       
|      |              | Title | Executive
 Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of AmREIT
 Monthly Income & Growth III Corporation, the General Partner of AmREIT
 Monthly Income & Growth Fund III, Ltd.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 387 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 387

    Celebrating the 2014 Arctic Winter Games, in Fairbanks, Alaska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2014

  Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Begich) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 
                           and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Celebrating the 2014 Arctic Winter Games, in Fairbanks, Alaska.

Whereas the Arctic Winter Games, held every 2 years, is a premier sporting and 
        cultural event and a true celebration of athletic competition, 
        friendship, and cooperation among individuals living in the Arctic;
Whereas the Arctic Winter Games, as envisioned over 40 years ago by Alaska 
        Governor Wally Hickel and commissioners from the Northwest Territories 
        and Yukon, continues to promote the core values of its creation: 
        athletic competition, cultural exhibition, and social interchange;
Whereas the Fairbanks North Star Borough has a uniquely qualified community to 
        welcome the vast cultural benefits that accompany serving as the host of 
        the 2014 Arctic Winter Games;
Whereas the 2014 Arctic Winter Games welcomes more than 1,400 athletes from 9 
        contingents, representing nations that include the United States, 
        Canada, Greenland, and Russia;
Whereas the State of Alaska is proud to contribute to the Arctic Winter Games 
        287 Alaskan athletes, ages 13 to 24; and
Whereas the 2014 Arctic Winter Games marks the fifth Arctic Winter Games hosted 
        in Alaska since the first competition in 1970: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates the dedicated athletes, coaches, 
        volunteers, leaders, and staff who contribute to the mission 
        and success of the 2014 Arctic Winter Games;
            (2) welcomes the return of the Arctic Winter Games to 
        Fairbanks, Alaska, for the first time since 1988; and
            (3) celebrates the continuing friendly competition among 
        northern circumpolar countries and the great cultural exchange 
        that keeps northern traditions alive.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 3287-006]


American Land Company, LLC, Burnshire Hydroelectric, LLC; Notice 
of Transfer of Exemption

    1. By letter filed February 14, 2012, American Land Company, LLC 
informed the Commission that its exemption from licensing for the 
Burnshire Dam Project No. 3287, originally issued September 22, 
1982,\1\ has been transferred to Burnshire Hydroelectric, LLC. The 
project is located on the North Fork, Shenandoah River in Shenandoah 
County, Virginia. The transfer of an exemption does not require 
Commission approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 20 FERC ] 62,512, Order Granting Exemption From Licensing of 
a Small Hydroelectric Project of 5 Megawatts or Less.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Burnshire Hydroelectric, LLC, located at 480 N Pifer Road, Star 
Tannery, Virginia 22654 is now the exemptee of the Burnshire Dam 
Project No. 3287.

    Dated: February 27, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5107 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VIRNA L. SANTOS ,

Plaintiff,

v.

LORETTA LYNCH ,

Defendant s

. No. 1:16

- cv

- 00351

- DAD

- SMS

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OR TRANSFER (Doc. Nos. 9, 13)

On April 29, 2016, defendant Loretta Lynch filed a motion to dismiss this action for lack of venue pursuant to Rule 12(b)( 3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or in the alternative, to transfer the matter to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. (Doc. No. 9.) Subsequently, on May 27, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation to transfer this acti on to the District of Columbia. (Doc. No. 13.)
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), “[t] he district court of a district in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice,

transfer s uch case to any district or division in which it could have been brought. ” According to the stipulation, the parties agree that the District of Columbia is the only district for which venue is proper. (Doc. No. 13 at 1.) Finding good cause and in the in terest s of justice, the court grants the parties’ stipulation.1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Accordingly,

1. The parties’ stipulation to transfer this action to the District of Columbia (Doc. No. 13) is granted;

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to transfer this action to the United Stat es District

Court for the District of Columbia as soon as reasonably possible;

3. Defendant’s motion for dismiss al or transfer (Doc. No. 9) is denied as moot; and

4. The initial scheduling conference
, currently set for June 22, 2016 before Magistrate Judge Sand ra M. Snyder
, is vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

### May 31, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
October 29, 2013



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MARK DAVID MEIER , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00555

- CV V.

LISA MEIER , Appellee

____________ ____________________ Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on April 5, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Mark David Meier. We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.