alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.63


December 30, 1998

Mr. Daniel Borislow
Chief Executive Officer
Tel-Save.com, Inc.
6802 Rte. 202
New Hope, PA  18938

Dear Dan:

A "Change in Control" as defined in my Employment  Agreement  dated July 3, 1997
and as defined in my Stock Option Agreement dated October 13, 1998 will occur on
your  resignation  as Chief  Executive  Officer.  As a result I may terminate my
employment  and receive  Compensation  for the remaining  term of the Employment
Agreement (approximately 22 months) without mitigation.

You have  requested  that I continue  in my current  capacity  rather than elect
immediate  termination of my employment and payment of the Compensation required
under the Employment Agreement.

     1.   I will continue as Chief Financial Officer of Tel-Save.com, Inc. until
          a replacement is found but no later than October 31, 1999.

     2.   My compensation  will continue  without any requirement for mitigation
          for 22 months after a replacement is found or October 31, 1999.

     3.   I will continue as a Director of  Tel-Save.com,  Inc. until expiration
          of my current Term (year 2000).

     4.   I will consult on a limited basis after cessation of employment  until
          December 31, 2000.

     5.   I will be paid $20,000.00 per month for commencing January 1999.

     6.   The  250  000  stock  options  which  I  have  are  fully  vested  and
          exercisable as of December 30,1998.

     7.   All other  terms of my  Employment  Contract  will  continue  to be in
          effect until October 31, 1999.

Any other arrangements for services will be separately  negotiated with the then
appropriate executives of the Company.

Please indicate your acceptance and agreement in the space provided below.

Yours truly;                                            Accepted and Agreed
                                                        Tel-Save.com, Inc.


George P. Farley                                        By:
                                                           ---------------------
                                                           Daniel Borislow, CEO
Exhibit 13



THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD.



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY

RULE
13a14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nobuo Kuroyanagi, President (principal executive officer) of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    NOBUO KUROYANAGIName: Nobuo Kuroyanagi Title:  
President (Principal executive officer)




Dated: September 28, 2006



---

THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD.



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY

RULE 13a14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual
Report of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nobuyuki
Hirano, Managing Director (principal financial officer) of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    NOBUYUKI HIRANOName: Nobuyuki Hirano Title:   Managing
Director (Principal financial officer)




Dated: September 28, 2006
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41689 Summary Calendar

EDGAR ALEXANDER HERRERA-VILLATORO Petitioner-Appellant

v. WARDEN JOE D. DRIVER Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CV-30
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Edgar Alexander Herrera-Villatoro (“Herrera”), federal inmate # 97107- 079, appeals the dismissal without prejudice ofhis 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Herrera challenged the starting date of his federal sentence for illegal reentry and argued that he should have received credit for the Texas state sentence he served after the state revoked his deferred-adjudication probation. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D February 12, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-41689

2 Before filing the instant action, Herrera did not complete the final step of the admi nistrative process provided by the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The Central Officeofthe Bureau ofPrisonstwice rejected hisappeal, finding that the first appeal was untimely and the second appeal did not include the correct number of copies or a copy of the Institution Administrative Remedy Request Form or warden’s response. Herrera therefore failed to exhaust properly his available administrative remedies. SeeWoodford v. Ngo, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 2386- 87 (2006) (holding that habeas exhaustion requires proper exhaustion of the administrative process). Consequently, the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action without prejudice to Herrera’s return to federal court once his administrative remedies are fully exhausted. See Fuller
v. Rich, 11 F.3d 61, 62 (5th Cir. 1994). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 16, 2015

No. 04-15-00640-CR

Eduardo REYES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR0808

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court imposed sentence on September 9, 2015. Appellant’s notice of appeal was 

due to be filed by October 9, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). On October 13, 2015, Appellant

filed a notice of appeal, and on October 14, 2015, he filed a motion for extension of time to file a 

notice of appeal.

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal is GRANTED; 

Appellant’s notice of appeal is deemed timely filed. See id. R. 26.3.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of October, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsCommentaries     Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians
        
            Commentaries
 Keyword
 Type Select a CategoryTop StoriesMission/TrainingFeaturesSecretary of the AFAF Chief of StaffChief Master Sgt. of the AFCommentariesSequestration NewsSpace/TechnologyHumanitarianAFSO 21Women's History Month 1-15EnvironmentalWarrior CareDiversityDignified TransferSafetyHeritageAir Force FamilyPersonnel MattersCommander's Call TopicsHaiti Earthquake ReliefDon't Ask Don't TellSuicide PreventionWarrior GamesEnergyAircraftEtchbergerSexual AssaultOperation TomodachiOperation Odyssey Dawn2011 Appropriations InformationHurricane Irene9/11AFAWeek in PhotosThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their Words2012 Appropriations InformationAfrican American History MonthAfrican American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29Fiscal Year BudgetAir Force StoriesColorado WildfireChief of Staff ArchiveHurricane IsaacAFA 2012APP RSSAPP Airman VisualsExpeditionary OperationsHurricane SandyTransition GPSAir Force in SpaceSports/RecreationH1N1Women's History Month 16-30Oklahoma Tornado ReliefMemorial DayCOVID-19 CommentariesCOVID-19
 RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 March 24, 2014100 pounds later: The new me
        I never used to push myself physically. Even as a high school athlete, I didn’t feel the drive to push harder. I spent my first 10 years in the Air Force getting by just fine as a smoker, who barely exercised. I steadily gained 10 pounds per year during the first four years.  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
SCWC

- 15

- 0000309

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

________________________________________________________________ AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B., a federal savings bank,

Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

JOHNNY KINMAN CHAN ; JEAN TOSHIKO CHAN ; DIRECTOR OF TAXATION, STATE OF HAWAI  I ; CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) N.A. ; HAWAI  I HOUSING FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Public Body and Corporate

Politic , Respondents/Defendant s - Appellees ,
and

VILLAGES OF KAPOLEI ASSOC IATION (incorrectly identified in t he caption as ASSOCIATION OF AP ARTMENT OWNERS OF THE VILLAGES OF

KAPOLEI), Petitioner /Defendant

- Appellant.
(SCWC

- 15

- 0000309; CAAP

- 15

- 0000309; CIVIL NO. 13

- 1

- 0944)

VILLAGES OF KAPOLEI ASSOCIATION, a Hawai  i non

- profit corporation, Petitioner/Plaintiff

- Appellant,

vs.
JOHNNY KINMAN CHAN, JEAN TOSHIKO CHAN ; FIRST BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ; DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, STATE OF HAWAI  I; CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) N.A.; HAWAII HOUSING FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a P ublic Body and Body Corporate and Politic, Respondents/D efendants

- Cross

- Claim Defendants

- Appellees,

and Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000395 04-DEC-2019 10:36 AM2

AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B., a federal savings bank, Res pondent /Defendant

- Cross

- Claimant

- Appellee

. (SCWC

- 15

- 0000395; CAAP

- 15

- 0000395; CIVIL NO. 12

- 1

- 2466)

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION S FOR WRIT O F CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner Defendant

- Appellant/Plaintiff

- Appellant Villages of Kapolei Association’s application s for writ of certiorari
filed on October 19, 2019 in SCWC

- 15

- 0000 309 and October 21,
2019 in SCWC

- 15

- 0000 395 , are her eby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai  i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, D ecember 4, 2019

.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A157
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18. U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Report of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (the Bank) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard M. Riccobono, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank.

Date: August 12, 2008



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard M. Riccobono             
|Richard M. Riccobono                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
      31.2




CERTIFICATION


I,
      Mary
      Desmond, certify that:


1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December
      31,
      2007, of Techprecision Corporation;


2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:


a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and


c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:


a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and


b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.







Dated:
                February 14, 2008
            /s/
                Mary DesmondMary
                DesmondChief
                Financial Officer
#### Cunningham, Appellant, *v.*Marable, Appellee.

(No. 31022

Decided May 28, 1947.)

*Mr. John Buffalo*and *Mr. Clinton J. Wall,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Crifchfield, Critchfield $ Critchfield, Mr. John G. Johnston, Jr.,*and *Mr. Huber J. Snyder,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENT OF OPERATION FOR THE PERIOD OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 (AUDITED)
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000948547
<NAME> PHYSICIAN HEALTHCARE PLAN OF NEW JERSEY, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,504,664
<SECURITIES>                                 6,529,250
<RECEIVABLES>                                  424,211
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,637,823
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,637,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,839,555
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    23,794,634
<OTHER-SE>                                (18,996,366)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,637,823
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,118,557
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,498,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,380,226)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,380,226)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,380,226)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (946)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (946)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51497

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OSCAR DOMINGUEZ-RIVERA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-2258-ALL

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Oscar Dominguez-Rivera

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 4, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-51497

2

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AgFeed Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), John A. Stadler, Interim Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 10, 2011
By:
/s/ John A. StadlerJohn A. StadlerInterim Chief Executive Officer and President





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 29, 2019

p1021 

# Order

Clerk October 29, 2019

158588

STEVEN SYKES,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 158588

COA: 339722

Wayne CC: 16

- 006510

- NO

CITY OF DETROIT,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

By order of February 4, 2019, the application for leave to appeal the September

11, 201 8 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decisions in

Wigfall v City of Detroit (Docket No. 156793) and West v City of Detroit (Docket No.

157097). On order of the Court, the cases having been decided on July 16, 2019, 504

Mich ___ (2019), the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1),

in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals

and we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for further proceedings not

inconsiste nt with our decision in Wigfall

.