alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

**Exhibit32.2**

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with thequarterly report of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel C. Sibley, ChiefFinancial Officer of Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P., the managing generalpartner of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           The information contained in theReport on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| Date: August 14, 2006 |   | /s/ Daniel C. Sibley              |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                  |   | Daniel C. Sibley                  |
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer           |
|                  |   | Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P. |

 

Thiscertification is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of thatsection.  This certification is notdeemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that theCompany specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

1

----
EXHIBIT
31.2




Certification
of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Chapter
63, Title 18 USC Section 1350 (A) and (B)





I, Barry
C. Kaye, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Coates International,
Ltd.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
evaluated the effectiveness of registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):




a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and




b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.







April
      11, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Barry
      C. KayeBarry
      C. KayePrincipal
      Accounting Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00443-CV

IN RE ALFARO OIL & GAS, LLC, 

Pinnacle Financial Partners Corporation, and Brian Alfaro

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 7, 2013

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On July 12, 2013, Relators Alfaro Oil & Gas, LLC, Pinnacle Partners Financial 

Corporation and Brian Alfaro filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On July 22, 2013, Relators 

filed a motion for stay of the sanctions order pending a ruling on the mandamus petition. The court 

has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that Relators are not entitled 

to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion to stay the 

sanctions order are denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. DC-12-315, styled Leland Rogness v. Alfaro Oil & Gas, LLC, Pinnacle 

Partners Financial Corporation, and Brian Alfaro, Individually, pending in the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval 

County, Texas, the Honorable Ana Lisa Garza presiding.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Michael J. Smith, President and Chief Financial Officer of Trimaine Holdings,
Inc.  (the "Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  that:

(1)  the  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  of the Company for the period ended
     December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
     78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 28, 2003


                                    /s/  Michael  J.  Smith
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Michael  J.  Smith
                                    President and Chief Financial  Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





|In connection with the quarterly report of Execute Sports, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|Dated:  August 19, 2008
# L_2006015EN.01004301.xml

| 20.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 15/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 15/43

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 96/2006

of 19 January 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 13 to 19 January 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 January 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
#### Fredrick George BEIHL, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. C-86-832.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 27, 1988.

*977E. Alvin Schay, Appellant Public Defender, Norman, for appellant.

No appearance by appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

Frederick George Beihl, appellant, was charged in Oklahoma County District Court, Case Nos. CRF-86-1665, 1668, 1673 and 1677, with two counts of Indecent Exposure, four counts of Lewd Acts with a Child Under Sixteen Years of Age, six counts of Forcible Oral Sodomy and two counts of First Degree Rape. Petitioner entered guilty pleas to all counts and was sentenced to five (5) years for each of the Indecent Exposure counts, ten (10) years for each count of the Lewd Acts With Child Under Sixteen, fifteen (15) years for each of the Forcible Oral Sodomy counts and fifty (50) years for each of the Rape counts, all sentences to be served consecutively. The petitioner filed an application to withdraw his guilty pleas which was denied by the trial court. He now petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari.

After reviewing the record, we find that the trial court, in accordance with *King v. State,*553 P.2d 529 (Okl.Cr.1976), fully advised petitioner of the nature and consequences of his guilty pleas, clearly determined the voluntariness of the pleas, and clearly established the factual basis for each count. Although the trial court did not question petitioner extensively concerning his mental state, he did ask petitioner if the medication he was taking affected his judgment or if he had ever been treated for mental illness. The court also asked defense counsel if he had any reason to believe that petitioner was not mentally competent to appreciate and understand the nature, purpose, and consequences of his acts and of the proceeding. Defense counsel responded negatively. Consequently, we are of the opinion that the trial court substantially complied with the plea guidelines. *See State v. Durant,*609 P.2d 792 (Okl.Cr.1980). This assignment of error is without merit.

The petitioner states in his second proposition that his sentences are excessive and should be modified in the interest of justice. The petitioner’s sentences are based on fourteen (14) separate sexual offenses. Those offenses were committed over a period of approximately fourteen (14) months with four separate victims including the petitioner’s own daughter, and none of the victimized children were over the age of nine years old. This Court has long held that no sentence may be modified unless that sentence shocks the conscience of this Court. *Clanton v. State,*711 P.2d 937 (Okl.Cr.1985). Considering the serious nature of these offenses and the number of offenses, we cannot say the sentences shock the conscience of this Court. This assignment is meritless.

The petition for writ of certiorari is accordingly DENIED.

BRETT, P.J., and PARKS, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          17,629
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 659,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        626,816
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   659,337
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,329
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   804
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,030
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,247
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,783
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,783
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 161 (Friday, August 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 52044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21265]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7559]

In the Matter of the Designation of Sangeen Zadran, Also Known as 
Sangin, Also Known as Sangin Zadran, Also Known as Sangeen, Also Known 
as Sangeen Khan Zadran, Also Known as Fateh, as a Specially Designated 
Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as 
Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Sangeen Zadran, 
also known as Sangin, also known as Sangin Zadran, also known as 
Sangeen, also known as Sangeen Khan Zadran, also known as Fateh, 
committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism 
that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, 
foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: August 15, 2011.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-21265 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13263-13264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5418]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 48-2011]


Foreign-Trade Zone 109 -- Watertown, NY; Amendment to 
Application; North American Tapes, LLC (Textile Athletic Tape), 
Watertown, NY

    A request has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the 
Board) by the Jefferson County Industrial Development Authority 
(JCIDA), grantee of FTZ 109, to amend its application requesting 
authority on behalf of North American Tapes (NAT), to manufacture 
athletic tape under FTZ procedures within FTZ 109. The application was 
docketed under docket number 48-2011 on July 15, 2011 (76 FR 43259, 7-
20-2011).
    The NAT facility (25 employees) is located within FTZ 109 at 22430 
Fisher

[[Page 13264]]

Road in the Jefferson County Industrial Park (Site 1). The facility is 
used to produce pressure-sensitive adhesive athletic tape with textile 
fabric backing material for the U.S. market and export.
    JCIDA has now amended the application to provide updated and 
corrected information regarding the domestic availability and technical 
specifications of the textile fabric that would be used as an input to 
NAT's manufacturing process.
    Public comment on the amended application is invited from 
interested parties. Submissions (original and 3 copies) shall be 
addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at the following address: 
Office of the Executive Secretary, Room 2111, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230-0002. The 
closing period for receipt of comments is April 5, 2012. Rebuttal 
comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period 
may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to April 20, 2012.
    A copy of the amended application will be available for public 
inspection at the Office of the Foreign-Trade Zones Board's Executive 
Secretary at the address listed above and in the ``Reading Room'' 
section of the Board's Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. For further information, contact Pierre Duy at or (202) 482-1378.

    Dated: February 29, 2012.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5418 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 28, 2020

a0720 

# Order

Clerk July 28, 2020

160300(17)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 160300

COA: 350088

Wayne CC: 08

- 001672

- FC

RICHARD MERLO,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s Mar ch 3,

2020 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
(d) EPA-approve

State Source-speci

requirements.