alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Dean Whipple, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2213

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Mary Nathell Jones, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 6, 2000 Filed: April 11, 2000

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Mary Nathell Jones pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 317, 1344 & 2. The district court 1 sentenced her to 15 months of imprisonment and 3 years of supervised release. During the term of supervised release, the probation officer reported that Jones had violated the conditions of release by traveling outside the judicial district and by associating with a person engagedin criminal activity or convicted of a felony; the probation officer also referred-2-

to Jones’s three previous violation reports involving drug use. The government moved for revocation. At the hearing, Jones admitted that she had associated with a convicted felon but denied that she had left the judicial district. After a state trooper testified, the district court found that Jones had committed both violations, revoked her release, and sentenced her to 11 months imprisonment with no further term of supervised release. Jones appeals the revocation and sentence.

Because Jones voiced no objection at sentencing, we review for plain error. See Un ited States v. Prendergast , 4 F.3d 560, 561 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam). We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to show she committed the charged violations of her supervised release and that the district court did not plainly err in imposing the revocation sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (court may revoke defendant’s supervised release if it finds by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant violated condition of supervised release; authorizing up to 3 years imprisonment upon revocation of supervised release if offense that resulted in term of supervised release was a Class B felony); 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (authorizing not more than 30 years imprisonment); 18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(2) (Class B felony is an offense for which the maximum term of imprisonment is 25 years or more); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a) (recommending revocation imprisonment range of 5 to 11 months). We reject Jones’s contention that the district court erred in permitting and considering certain hearsay testimony. See UnitedStates v. Reynolds , 49 F.3d 423, 526 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard for admitting hearsay in revocation hearing is different than at trial; federal rules of evidence do not apply, but rules of criminal procedure afford defendant the opportunity to question adverse witnesses).
Accordingly, we affirm.-3-

A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIaGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6690

In Re: VERNON BULLOCK,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-03-280-5)

Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 5, 2004

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vernon Bullock, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Vernon Bullock petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging

the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (2000) case. He seeks an order from this court directing

the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals

that the district court has dismissed Bullock’s § 2241 petition.

Because the district court has recently decided Bullock’s case, we

deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in

forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
P. 1


# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 77 ) IV-C-4

3 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:55AM Sheet 77 of 232P. 2

^ ' t0Sr " 4 > "CZ-C--M 3

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO NAGENC Y

WASHINGTON

, D.C
. 2046 0 <TA N as' -98

a

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N Honorabl e Fred Grand y Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D . C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Grandy : Thi s in respons e t o you r January11 , communicatio n relaying the concern s o f Mr . Willi-a mL . Mou

w regarding EPA' s regulatoryproposa l t o requir e onboar d canister s o n ne w vehicle s t o contro l refueling emissions . T o assis t yo u with you r response , I hav e enclose d a cop yo f our proposa l fo r you r review . Sectio n E (page s 31177-31182 ) explain s EPA' s overal l rational e fo r proposing onboar d controls . I f yo u woul dlik e furthe r detail s o f ou r analysis , pleas e contac t Mr . Phili p Carlso n o f the Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc ho f th e Emissio n Contro l Technolog yDivision , 256 5 Plymout hRoad , An n Arbor , M I 4810 5 (FT S 374-827 0 o r Commercia l (313 ) 668-4270) . Than k yo u fo r sending Mr . Mouw' s lette r whic hw e wil l plac e in ou r publi c docke t fo r consideratio n i n the nex t phas e o f ou r rulemaking process . Sincerel yyours ,
Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s Enclosur e l/ca Docke t A-87-1 1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-21154

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BUSARI DANIAN, a/k/a Ubong Okon Mbatt,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-92-CR-283-9

- - - - - - - - - -

February 12, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Busari Danian has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and we

have independently reviewed counsel’s brief, the points raised by

Danian in response to that brief, and the record, and found no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Please attach the following grant letter to Cochise Community College (Docket No. FAA-2015-0812)
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael Jordan Friedman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Fresh Harvest Products, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael Jordan Friedman



_________________________________________

Michael Jordan Friedman, Chief Executive Officer

And Chief Financial Officer



Date: February 25, 2009
Subject: FW: Petition to exempt food-related chemical substances from TSCA CDR exposure reproting 

requirments in 2016 

From: Karen Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Estreicher, Herb" <estreicher@khlaw.com>

Date: 04/11/2012 03:20 PM

Subject: Petition to exempt food-related chemical substances from TSCA CDR exposure reproting requirments in 2016 

Mr. Herb Estreicher, J.D., Ph.D.

Keller and Heckman LLP

1001 G Street, N.W., Suite 500 West

Washington, D.C. 20001

RE: Petition for Partial Exemption from CDR Reporting Requirements

Dear Mr. Estreicher:

On December 14, 2011, EPA received your petition, pursuant to 40 CFR 711.15(b)(2)(iii), requesting a partial exemption from 

CDR reporting requirements for 1,3-Propanediol, (CAS RN: 504-63-2), Bentonite, Acid Leached, (CAS RN: 70131-50-9) and 

Palm Kernel Oils (CASRN: 8023-79-8). Your petition has been assigned docket number OPPT-2012-0221. 

Your petition is in the queue for review. I will keep you informed of any developments. If you have any questions, please 

contact me at Hoffman.karen@epa.gov or 202-564-8158

Sincerely,

Karen Hoffman

IUR Petitions Manager

Chemical Control Division

cc: Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2012-0221

Karen Hoffman

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington, DC 20460

202-564-8158

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Program Files (x86)\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\7792800156852413... 7/17/2013
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, John Bennett, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report of Probe Manufacturing, Inc.;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the period covered by this  report;  3.   Based on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in  all material respects  the  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this report;  4.   The registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such disclosure  controls  and              procedures  to  be  designed  under  our supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating to the registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which  this  report  is  being  prepared;  b)   evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure controls  and  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the  end  of  the  period  covered  by  this  report based on such evaluation;  and  c)   disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most  recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the  case  of  an  annual  report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably  likely  to  materially     affect,  the registrant's internal control  over  financial  reporting;  and  5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):  a)   all significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are  reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information; and  b)   any fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management or other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the registrant's internal  control  over  financial  reporting.     DATED  this  9th  day  of  August, 2007.   /s/  John Bennett ------------------------------- John Bennett Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 25, 2010

d0517 

# Order

May 25, 2010

139992(26)(27)

GENE T. FAVORS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 139992 COA: 292245 Ingham CC: 08-001343-CZ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 26, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously. The motion fo r miscellaneous relief is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5239]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP12-399-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: 2012 Annual FL&U Percentage Adjustment to be effective 
4/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 2/24/12.
    Accession Number: 20120224-5076.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-400-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Updates to GT&C Section 3.13 to be effective 4/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 2/27/12.
    Accession Number: 20120227-5075.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-403-000.
    Applicants: Crossroads Pipeline Company.
    Description: TRA 2012 to be effective 4/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 2/27/12.
    Accession Number: 20120227-5230.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-402-000.
    Applicants: Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Fuel Retention Rates--2012 to be effective 4/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 2/28/12.
    Accession Number: 20120228-5021.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-404-000.
    Applicants: High Island Offshore System, L.L.C.
    Description: 2012 Annual Fuel Filing to be effective 4/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 2/28/12.
    Accession Number: 20120228-5049.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-405-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company
    Description: Annual Fuel Tracker Filing 2012 to be effective 4/1/
2012.
    Filed Date: 2/28/12.
    Accession Number: 20120228-5051.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/12.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, and service can be found at: 
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other 
information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-
8659.

    Dated: February 28, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary
[FR Doc. 2012-5239 Filed 3-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Globetech Ventures Corp. (the Company) on Amended Form 20-F for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.   Date:  April 12, 2007/s/ Ping ShenName:Ping ShenTitle:Chief Financial Officer/s/ Casey ForwardName:Casey ForwardTitle:President, Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of approval of International Marine Consultants, as a commercial gauger.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, International Marine Consultants, 429 Padre Rufo St. Floral Park, Hato Rey, PR 00917, has been approved to gauge petroleum, petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific gauger service this entity is approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                    

*http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​*

# DATES:

The approval of International Marine Consultants as commercial gauger became effective on November 3, 2011. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for November 2014.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher Mocella, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: February 22, 2012.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. 2012-5122 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
#### PERCELL BLAKENEY *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

*Timothy H. Everett*and *Nicole Anker,*legal intern, in support of the petition.

*Paul J. Ferencek,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 25, 1998

The petitioner Percell Blakeney’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 568 (AC 15788), is denied.
UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D.C .

• ) AER O WAYS , INC. , )

COMPLAINANT , ) ) V . ) Docke t No . 16-09-1 2 ) DELAWAR ERIVE R& BA Y AUTHORITY , )

RESPONDENT . )

NOTIC EO FEXTENSIO N O FTIM E - a

— I

:..'-> X D Th e FA A receive dyou r

fa x an dlette r

date dFebruary 16 , 2008 , o n behal f o f th e Aer o Way s In&.g

p wher e b y an dthroug hcounsel , Aer o Ways , Inc . submitte dit s unoppose dMotio n for Extensio n ^ Tim e t o Respon dt o Respondent' s Motio n t o Dismiss . 3 S Respondent' s documentatio n submitte dwithit s Motion t o Dismis s i s substantia l an d Complainant' s motio n was timely . Althoug hPart 1 6 intend s t o expedit e th e handlin g an d dispositio n o f

airport-relate dcomplaints , Sectio n 16.11(a ) provide s tha t a n extensio n o f

tim e may b e grante dwher e necessary o r appropriat e for

afai t an dcomplet e hearin g o f th e matter s before th e agency . A s th e reques t

fo r extensio n o f

tim e i s wit hth e consen t

o f th e partie s an dnecessary , a n extensio n o f tim e t o fil e Complainant' s Respons e t o th e Motio n t o Dismis s an dit s Repl y t o Respondent' s Answe r i s appropriate . Complainant' s Respons e t o th e Motion t o Dismis s an dit s Repl y ar e no w du e o n o r before Marc h31 , 2010 . Accordingly , th e Respondent' s Rebutta l i s no w du e o n o r before Apri l 12 , 2010 .

ERz^bCT t J . Wei r Attorne y Airport s an dEnvironmenta l La w Branc h 

# ^"^MAJ^^IMO .

i.iliji.- . .\ :CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E

I HEREB Y CERTIF Y tha t o n Marc h15 , 2010, 1 cause dt o b e place di n th e Unite dState s mai l (firs t

class , postag e pre-paid ) o r personall y delivered , atru e cop y o f th e foregoin g NOTIC EO FEXTENSIO N O FTIM Eaddresse dto : Mr . Josep hMichae l Lamonac a Ne w Castl e County Airport P.O . Bo x 1058 3 Wilmington , D E19850-058 3 (610)558-337 6 (302)221-234 7 FA X avlaw@prodigy.ne t peggy . craven@prodigy.ne t Mr . R . Judso n Scaggs , Jr . Ms . Lesli e A . Polozot i Morris , Nichols , Arsht , & , Tunnell , LL P 120 1 Marke t

Street , 18 * Floo r P.O . Bo x 134 7 Wilmington , D E19899-134 7 : . . (302)658-920 0 ' • ' lpolizoti@mnat.co m

EliiaVeth)J,Wei r Airport s La w Branch , Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l

:ii>^ :
Exhibit 10(d) 





CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 




We consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report, dated October 14, 2005, with respect to the financial statements
of BlackRock Fundamental Growth Principal Protected Fund of BlackRock Principal Protected
Trust (formerly Merrill Lynch Fundamental Growth Principal Protected Fund of Merrill
Lynch Principal Protected Trust) for the year ended August 31, 2005 in this Registration
Statement on Form N-1A under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (File No. 811-21162) of
BlackRock Fundamental Growth Principal Protected Fund of BlackRock Principal Protected
Trust. 



	  	/s/  Ernst
& Young LLP 







Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

   December
26, 2006