alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report
of Aspen Diversified Fund LLC (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended March  31, 2011, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Deborah Terry,Chief
Financial Officer of Aspen Partners, Ltd, Managing Member of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | the
forgoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | the
information contained in the Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Fund.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | Date: May 16, 2011                           
| | ---------------------------------------------
| |                                              
| |                                              
| | /s/ Deborah Terry                            
| | Deborah Terry, Chief Financial Officer       
| | Aspen Partners, Ltd.                         
| | Managing Member of Aspen Diversified Fund LLC
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10239

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LAWRENCE DERWOOD KENEMORE, JR., a/k/a

Lawrence D. Kenemore, Jr., a/k/a Larry Kenemore,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:95-CR-099-D

- - - - - - - - - -

September 27, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lawrence Kenemore appeals from the district court’s denial

of his motion, made at rearraignment as a plea of double

jeopardy, to dismiss the indictment against him on the ground

that it violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. We have

jurisdiction over the interlocutory appeal pursuant to Abney v.

United States, 431 U.S. 651, 662 (1977).
No. 96-10239

- 2 -

The independent fiduciary appointed in Kenemore’s civil case

exercised what amounted to a receivership over the assets of the

ATG Association of Trust and Guarantee (ATG), including the funds

seized from Kenemore’s bank and brokerage accounts. The

independent fiduciary’s actions did not constitute punishment for

double jeopardy purposes. United States v. Woods, 949 F.2d 175,

177 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 961 (1992).

Kenemore’s allegation that the default judgment in the civil

action included a fine and restitution is without a factual

basis; the district court deferred imposition of a money judgment

until after the completion of the criminal prosecution. 

Kenemore’s contention that the district court in the civil action

was attempting to circumvent double jeopardy by declining to

impose civil sanctions is not ripe for review. Cinel v. Connick,

15 F.3d 1338, 1341 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 189

(1994). Kenemore’s appeal is frivolous; his notice of appeal did

not deprive the district court of jurisdiction to proceed to

trial. United States v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985, 988 (5th Cir.)(en

banc), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 (1980).

The motions of Kenemore and the Government to supplement

their record excerpts and the Government’s motion for an

extension of the briefing schedule and withdrawal of its original

record excerpts are DENIED.

Finally, Kenemore has been warned that frivolous appeals may

result in sanctions against him. Accordingly, Kenemore is barred
No. 96-10239

- 3 -

from filing any pro se appeals in this court without the advance

written permission of a judge of this court; the clerk of this

court is directed to return to Kenemore, unfiled, any attempted

submission inconsistent with this bar. To avoid further

sanctions, which could include monetary sanctions, Kenemore is

admonished to review any pending appeals and to withdraw any

appeals that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED. MOTIONS DENIED. SANCTIONS IMPOSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT OF PEGASUS MEDIA & COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY  BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>          0000948590
<NAME>         PEGASUS MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>   1
<CURRENCY>     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       8,416,778
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,273,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                   243,000
<INVENTORY>                                    697,957
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,442,930
<PP&E>                                      47,111,810
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,288,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             126,228,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,963,936
<BONDS>                                     81,587,778
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,700
<OTHER-SE>                                  (9,598,181)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               126,228,208
<SALES>                                     46,196,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,196,700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               43,251,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (96,326)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,438,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (9,396,351)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   120,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (9,276,351)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (250,603)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (9,526,954)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (56.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (56.04)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Michael R. Boyce, Chief Executive
Officer and President of PQ Corporation (the "Registrant") and James P. Cox, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:



Date:
May 14, 2007

| |  | By: |  | /s/MICHAEL R. BOYCEMichael R. Boyce Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief
Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
| |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By: |  | /s/JAMES P. COXJames P. Cox Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)                            

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.2

Exhibit 10.2 -- Executive Officer Compensation

         The Temecula Valley Bank ("Bank") Board of Directors, upon the
recommendation of the Executive Officer Compensation Committee, approved the
following:

         (1)   An increase in the annual base compensation effective January 1,
               2007 of:

               (a)  James W. Andrews, EVP/Real Estate Manager, from $210,000 to
                    $220,000;
               (b)  Frank Basirico Jr., SEVP/Chief Administrative Officer, from
                    $250,000 to $262,500;
               (c)  Thomas P. Ivory, SEVP/East County Regional Manager, from
                    $170,000 to $180,000;
               (d)  Timothy McDougal, EVP/Manager, from $145,000 to $155,000;
               (e)  William H. McGaughey, SEVP/Director of Finance and SBA, from
                    $210,000 to $220,000;
               (f)  Donald A. Pitcher, EVP/CFO, from $170,000 to $180,000;
               (g)  Martin E. Plourd, EVP/Chief Operating Officer, from $165,000
                    to $180,000;
               (h)  Thomas M. Shepherd, SEVP/Chief Credit Officer, from $210,000
                    to $220,000;
               (i)  Donald L. Schempp, EVP/North County Regional Manager, from
                    $175,000 to $185,000;
               (j)  Stephen H. Wacknitz, CEO/President/Chairman, from $400,000
                    to $500,000;

         (2)   Upon the request of Stephen H. Wacknitz, the Bank entered into an
               amendment to the Wacknitz employment agreement dated December 26,
               2006 that provides for the reduction of his annual bonus from 5%
               pre-tax, pre-bonus net income to 4%, to be effective beginning
               with the year ended December 31, 2007 and continuing annually
               thereafter. (Mr. Wacknitz had previously requested reductions
               from the 7% level provided in his 2003 employment agreement);

         (3)   A Salary Continuation Plan ("SCP") to provide for a $200,000
               benefit per year, for 20 years, beginning at the age of 70, and
               authorization to purchase a related Bank-Owned Life Insurance
               policy, the terms of which are to be determined. As soon as the
               SCP is finalized, it will be filed as an exhibit to the
               appropriate filing under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;

         (4)   To the extent Executive Officers are affected, effective
               beginning in January 2007: (a) Bank Board of Director fees will
               increase per meeting from $1,750 to $1,850; and (b) Bank Director
               Loan Committee fees will increase per meeting from $350 to $400.
               Fees will not be paid to any member not in attendance beginning
               with the second missed meeting in any calendar year.
# L_2007091EN.01005301.xml

| 31.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 91/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 91/53

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2006/635/Euratom of 4 April 2006 on the conclusion, by way of signature, of and Agreement for Co-operation in the Peaceful Uses Nuclear Energy between the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 261 of 22 September 2006
  )

On the cover in the contents and on page 26 in the title and the signature:

for:

‘
  4 April 2006
  ’,

read:

‘
  4 April 2005
  ’.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-11275 Conference Calendar

ALEXANDER TITO HUMPHRIES, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ARTHUR STRAPP, Respondents-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CV-2121-L

-------------------- August 25, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Alexander Tito Humphries (“Humphries”) (a/k/a Achala-Odanga Humphrey) has appealed the decision of the district court to dismiss his case. The district court dismissed Humphries’ complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because Humphries does not address the district court’s dismissal of his case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in his appellate brief, he has abandoned the sole issue on appeal. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County DeputyNo. 98-11275 -2- Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, his appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED as such. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Furthermore, Humphries’ recently filed motion for leave to file exhibits in support of his brief is DENIED because the exhibits possess no relevance to the sole issue on appeal. MOTION DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MONSUR KAYODE RUFAI,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-70847

Agency No. A029-455-965

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 10, 2015** 

Before: FARRIS, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Monsur Kayode Rufai, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen to apply for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

FILED

MAR 16 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. 

Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the

petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Rufai’s motion to reopen for

failure to establish a prima facie case for asylum, withholding and relief under the

CAT, where Rufai did not establish that the Nigerian government would be unable

or unwilling to protect him, see Rahimzadeh v. Holder, 613 F.3d 916, 920 (9th Cir.

2010) (an applicant for asylum and withholding of removal bears the burden of

establishing that the government would be unwilling or unable to prevent his

persecution), or that he cannot safely relocate to another region of Nigera, see

Singh v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1113 (9th Cir. 2006) (“[T]o be eligible for relief

under the Convention Against Torture, [an applicant] bears the burden of proving

he would be unable to live elsewhere in the country safely.” (citation and internal

quotation marks omitted)).

Contrary to Rufai’s contention, the BIA elaborated its conclusions in

sufficient detail in denying his motion to reopen. See Najmabadi v. Holder, 597

F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010) (“[The BIA] does not have to write an exegesis on

every contention. What is required is merely that [the BIA] consider the issues

raised, and announce its decision in terms sufficient to enable a reviewing court to

2 13-70847
perceive that it has heard and thought and not merely reacted.” (citation and

quotation marks omitted)).

In light of this disposition, we do not reach Rufai’s remaining contentions. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 13-70847
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5352]



[[Page 13384]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Additional Guidance on Airfare/Air Tour Price Advertisements; 
Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department published a notice entitled ``Additional 
Guidance on Airfare/Air Tour Price Advertisements,'' in the Federal 
Register of February 27, 2012; the notice contained an incorrect 
address for the Department.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Lowry, Attorney, Office of 
Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings (C-70), 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., 
Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9349.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of February 27, 2012, in Vol. 38, at 77 FR 
11618, on page 11619, in the last paragraph, correct the address of the 
Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings (C-70) to read: 1200 New 
Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590. An electronic version of this 
document is available at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: February 29, 2012.
Samuel Podberesky,
Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings.
[FR Doc. 2012-5352 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
EXHIBIT 31.2





AULTRA GOLD INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302





I, Rauno Perttu, Chief Financial Officer of Aultra Gold Inc., certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 of Aultra Gold Inc





2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared; and





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial
reporting;





5. The issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls over financial reporting.





Date: August 12, 2009
By:
/s/  Rauno PerttuRauno PerttuChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5293]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Government/Industry Aeronautical Charting Forum Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the bi-annual meeting of the Federal 
Aviation Administration (FAA) Aeronautical Charting Forum (ACF) to 
discuss informational content and design of aeronautical charts and 
related products, as well as instrument flight procedures development 
policy and design criteria.

DATES: The ACF is separated into two distinct groups. The Instrument 
Procedures Group (IPG) will meet April 24, 2012 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 
p.m. The Charting Group will meet April 25 and 26, 2012 from 8:30 a.m. 
to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be hosted by Innovative Solutions 
International, a Pragmatics, Inc. Company at 1761 Business Center 
Drive, Reston, VA 20190.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information relating to the 
Instrument Procedures Group, contact Thomas E. Schneider, FAA, Flight 
Procedures Standards Branch, AFS-420, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., P.O. 
Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125; telephone (405) 954-5852; fax: 
(405) 954-2528.
    For information relating to the Charting Group, contact Valerie S. 
Watson, FAA, National Aeronautical Navigation Products (AeroNav 
Products), Quality Assurance & Regulatory Support, AJV-3B, 1305 East-
West Highway, SSMC4, Station 4640, Silver Spring, MD 20910; telephone: 
(301) 427-5155, fax: (301) 427-5412.
    The public must make arrangements by April 6, 2012, to present oral 
statements at the meeting. The public may present written statements 
and/or new agenda items to the committee by providing a copy to the 
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section not later 
than April 6, 2012, Public statements will only be considered if time 
permits.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 28, 2012.
Valerie S. Watson,
Co-Chair, Aeronautical Charting Forum.
[FR Doc. 2012-5293 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
[No. 36365.

Department Two.

November 21, 1963.]

#### W. G. Elmore *et al., Appellants,*v. Graystone of Centralia, Inc., *Respondent.*
      ***

*Wright, Wendells, Froelich & Power*and *Duane S. Rad-liff,*for appellants.

*251
      *R. George Ferrer*(of *Montgomery, Purdue, Blankinship &*Austin), for respondent.

Reported in 387 P. (2d) 75.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment (a) dismissing their action for rescission of a contract and (b) foreclosing defendant’s labor and materialmen’s lien for the construction of a concrete silo built pursuant to the contract.

Plaintiffs make 9 assignments of error: 5 to findings of fact entered; 3 to findings of fact requested but refused; and 1 to entry of judgment.

The first two categories of assignments of error present nothing but a conflicting interpretation by the parties of the evidence. The trial judge remarked, “There is considerable dispute in the evidence.” A review of the record discloses that the findings are supported by substantial evidence; we cannot disturb them. *Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.,*54 Wn. (2d) 570, 343 P. (2d) 183 (1959).

The findings of fact support the conclusions of law and judgment.

The judgment is affirmed, but the cause is remanded to the trial court to consider defendant’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees on appeal. RCW 60.04.130; *Hopkins v. Ulvestad,*46 Wn. (2d) 514, 522, 282 P. (2d) 806 (1955).

It is so ordered.