alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed 6/24/ 13 P. v. Kirker CA2/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b ). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

THOMAS ALLEN KIRKER,

Defendant and Appellant. 2d Crim. No. B246928

(Super. Ct. No. F479307

(San Luis Obispo County)

Thomas Allen Kirker appeals from the judgment entered after he pled no

contest to assault (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(4)) 1 and admitted a prior strike conviction

(§§ 667, subds. (d)

- (e); 1170.12, subds. (b)

- (c)). Five weeks after the plea, appellant

indicated that he wanted to withdraw his plea, but after new counsel was appointed,

withdrew the plea withdrawal motion. The trial court su spended imposition of sentence

and granted probation with 90 days jail. Appellant was ordered to pay a $240 restitution

fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b); a $240 probation revocation fine (§ 1202.44), and a $1,000 fine.

Appellant filed a notice of appeal and a r equest for certificate of probable

cause (§ 1237.5, subd. (a)) alleging that he did not commit the assault.

We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel's

examination of the record, counsel filed a brief raising no issues. On May 9, 2013, we

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code.2

advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions

or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. No response has been received.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant 's

attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist.

( People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 125

-

126.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

YEGAN, J.

W e concur:

GILBERT, P.J.

PERREN, J.3 Michael Duffy, Judge

Superior Court County of San Luis Obispo

______________________________

California Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal,

Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director an d Richard R. Lennon, Staff Attorney, for

Appellant./

No appearance for Respondent.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsCommentaries     Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians
        
            Commentaries
 Keyword
 Type Select a CategoryTop StoriesMission/TrainingFeaturesSecretary of the AFAF Chief of StaffChief Master Sgt. of the AFCommentariesSequestration NewsSpace/TechnologyHumanitarianAFSO 21Women's History Month 1-15EnvironmentalWarrior CareDiversityDignified TransferSafetyHeritageAir Force FamilyPersonnel MattersCommander's Call TopicsHaiti Earthquake ReliefDon't Ask Don't TellSuicide PreventionWarrior GamesEnergyAircraftEtchbergerSexual AssaultOperation TomodachiOperation Odyssey Dawn2011 Appropriations InformationHurricane Irene9/11AFAWeek in PhotosThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their Words2012 Appropriations InformationAfrican American History MonthAfrican American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29Fiscal Year BudgetAir Force StoriesColorado WildfireChief of Staff ArchiveHurricane IsaacAFA 2012APP RSSAPP Airman VisualsExpeditionary OperationsHurricane SandyTransition GPSAir Force in SpaceSports/RecreationH1N1Women's History Month 16-30Oklahoma Tornado ReliefMemorial DayCOVID-19 CommentariesCOVID-19
 RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 Sept. 2, 2014Eliminating stigma: A leadership responsibility
        Preventing suicide and defeating the mental health stigma.1

        


        2Go To Page
        
        of 2
        Go
1

        


        2Go To Page
        
        of 2
        Go  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*WILLIAM CONNELLY

*Lisa J. Steele,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 486 (AC 14639), is denied.

*908
      *Rita M. Shair,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 17, 1998
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00337

- CV

S PEARS C ONSTRUCTION M ANAGEMENT , LLC

, Appellant

V

.

P HYSICAL T HERAPY D YNAMICS , PLLC ; JRAD I NVESTMENTS , LLC ; AND F IRST G U A R ANTY B ANK , Appellees §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 348th District Court

of Tarrant County ( 348

- 314885

- 20 )

February 9, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that th e re

was error in the trial court’s o rder . It is ordered that the July 29, 2022 order granting

Physical Therapy Dynamics

, PLLC and JRAD Investments, LLC ’ s moti on to va cat e

the arb itration award and denying Spears Construction Management, LLC ’ s motio n to

co n firm is rever sed , and we render j ud gment confirming the final arbitration award

issued on Januar y 5, 2022.It is further ordered that Appellees Physical Therapy Dynamics , PLLC; JRAD

Investments, LLC ; and First Guar anty Bank shall pay all of the costs of t h is appeal,

for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel Justice Dabney Bassel
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1757 

To provide for the prepayment of a repayment contract between the United 

States and the Uintah Water Conservancy District, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 6, 2009 

Mr. BENNETT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the prepayment of a repayment contract between the United States and the Uintah Water Conservancy District, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PREPAYMENT OF CERTAIN REPAYMENT CON4 TRACTS BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND 

5 THE UINTAH WATER CONSERVANCY DIS6 TRICT. 

7 The Secretary of the Interior shall allow for prepay8 ment of the repayment contract no. 6–05–01–00143 be9 tween the United States and the Uintah Water Conser10 vancy District dated June 3, 1976, and supplemented and 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1757 IS

1 amended on November 1, 1985, and on December 30, 

2 1992, providing for repayment of municipal and industrial 

3 water delivery facilities for which repayment is provided 

4 pursuant to such contract, under terms and conditions 

5 similar to those used in implementing section 210 of the 

6 Central Utah Project Completion Act (Public Law 102– 

7 575), as amended. The prepayment— 

8 (1) shall result in the United States recovering 

9 the net present value of all repayment streams that 

10 would have been payable to the United States if this 

11 Act was not in effect; 

12 (2) may be provided in several installments to 

13 reflect substantial completion of the delivery facili14 ties being prepaid, and any increase in the repay15 ment obligation resulting from delivery of water in 

16 addition to the water being delivered under this con17 tract as of the date of enactment of this Act; 

18 (3) shall be adjusted to conform to a final cost 

19 allocation including costs incurred by the Bureau of 

20 Reclamation, but unallocated as of the date of the 

21 enactment of this Act that are allocable to the water 

22 delivered under this contract; 

23 (4) may not be adjusted on the basis of the 

24 type of prepayment financing used by the District; 

25 and 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1757 IS

1 (5) shall be made such that total repayment is 

2 made not later than September 30, 2019. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
U.S. D~ortment .;rf Tran~porta.Uon 

O;'T•Ce Of ::'II! sec~'Jry O{ 't:anSW'p:.1'"'0'1 

Chief. Documentary Services Div. 

Department of Tran.sporrarion 

Washington. D.C. 20590 

DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR 

SERVICE OF NOTiCE. PROCESS. ORDERS 

DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 

ATTENTION: DOC:K£T SECTION. C-55 

Air Ca1edonie International 

(Name of Company. please print) 

office at 8 rue Frederic Surleau, BP3736 Noumea. 98849 Nouvelle Ca1edonie 

(Address) 

• ha"ing its principal 

hereby de>igmues, pur;uanl to !'ection 46103 of Titlt; 49 of the U-S. Code 1 fum1erly section 1 005! bl of the Feder;d A' hl!ion Act 

of 1958. a~ am.:ndedt the person mm:.:d bci<>W as its Agent upon whom ~n-ic<: of all notices :u1d proce;;~_-nnd <Jll orders. decision><. 

and requirement> of 1he Department of-Transponation mn~· be made for and on behalf of ~id carrier. hereby cancding all pre,·iou, 

designations of agents mnde by it to the DOT. 

NruneofAgem ______________________________________________________________ Evelyn D. Sahr, Esq. __ 

Address 

. (Please Print) 

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC 

1717 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., 12th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20006 

The Agent so designated has written his name and ai50 his initials in the following space: 

Name ,

6\P iu C' 5'-q l\( r-,·oc..- ----'"'=~""'"""'-'..J.:I"'i:::t-~-~-' _:::-::.:-"-:co~=.-___;:._ _________________ {lnilials) -·"': ..=J.J:.'''"---------

'· 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Air Caledonie International ---------------------------has caused these 

(Name of Company) 

pre$enl5 to be signed in its name by -=D:..:id::::.;ie::.:r~T_,__ :...A.::P~P-=E::.:R~O::__ _______________ . PTesidem 

(P-lease Print) 

of said company. and to be anested under its corporate seal by 

Muriel FIXES corporate secretary 

(Secretary. or other Title) 

on this _ _.:.2_._3.___ __ day of september ' 19 2014 

ATIEST~ (Secretary . or other officer) 

CST F 1010.5 (1-95)
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1866 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the eligibility of 

parents of certain deceased veterans for interment in national cemeteries. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

eligibility of parents of certain deceased veterans for 

interment in national cemeteries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INTERMENT IN NATIONAL CEMETERIES OF 

4 PARENTS OF CERTAIN DECEASED VETERANS. 

5 (a) INTERMENT OF PARENTS OF CERTAIN DE6 CEASED VETERANS.—Section 2402 of title 38, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(9) If the Secretary determines there is 

10 enough space in open national cemeteries, the parent 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1866 IS

1 of a person listed in any of paragraphs (1) through 

2 (4) or paragraph (7) who, at the time of the par3 ent’s death, does not have a spouse, surviving 

4 spouse, or child who has been interred, or who, if de5 ceased, would be eligible to be interred, in a national 

6 cemetery pursuant to paragraph (5).’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (9) of section 

8 2402 of title 38, United States Code, shall apply with re9 spect to the death of an eligible parent on or after the 

10 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Order filed October 21, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00345

- CV

____________ ALBERT LUJAN D/B/A T EXAS WHOLESALE FLOWE R CO. , Appellant

V. NAVISTAR, INC., NAVI STAR INTERNATIONAL C ORPORATION, NAVISTAR INTERNATION AL TRANSPORTATION CORP. , INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AND ENGINE CORPORATI ON AND

SANTEX TRUCK CENTERS , LTD., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 77458



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed May 4, 2014

. To date, the filing fee of $19 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P

. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the following order.Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $1 9 5.00 to the

Clerk of this court on or before November 5 , 2014

. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal
will be dismiss ed.

PER CURIAM
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 5D 2 3

- 0821 LT Case No. 2016

- CP

- 001578

- A

_____________________________
H ANA A LKOOR O DEH , Appellant,

v.

M AHER M AH M OUD O DEH , A S P ERSONAL R EPRESENTATIVE O F T HE E STATE O F A DE L M AHER O DEH , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County

. Heidi Davis , Judge

. Kelly Feig, of The Law Office of Kelly D. Feig, P.A.
, Hallandale Beach , for Appellant.

Kelly C. Johnson , of KJ Law, P.A.
, Tavares , for Appellee.

September 26, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L AMBERT , H ARRIS , and B OATWRIGHT , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Waterstone Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard C. Larson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













/s/ Richard C. Larson


Richard C. Larson


Chief Financial Officer


August 6, 2010






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Waterstone Financial, Inc. and will be retained by Waterstone Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Farm Service Agency

# AGENCY:

Farm Service Agency, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces that the Farm Service Agency (FSA) now has funding for and is accepting guaranteed loan applications for the Conservation Loan (CL) Program. Due to a lack of program funding for direct CLs, direct loan applications are not being accepted at this time.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Connie Holman; telephone: (202) 690-0756. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication (Braille, large print, audio tape, etc.) should contact the USDA Target Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On May 13, 2011, FSA published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     (76 FR 27986) announcing that FSA was no longer accepting direct or guaranteed loan applications for the CL Program because of a lack of funding.                

On November 18, 2011, FSA received an appropriation to fund guaranteed CLs under the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012 (Pub. L. 112-55). Therefore, FSA has resumed accepting guaranteed loan applications for the CL Program.

FSA is not accepting direct CL applications as no new funding has been appropriated at this time. Conservation projects may still be funded through FSA's direct Farm Ownership and Farm Loan Operating programs for eligible applicants who do not qualify for the Guaranteed CL Program.

                    Potential guaranteed loan applicants should contact a lender. Potential direct loan applicants should contact their FSA state or county office; office locations can be found at                     *http://www.fsa.usda.gov.*

Signed on March 1, 2012.

Bruce Nelson,

Administrator, Farm Service Agency.

[FR Doc. 2012-5529 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
The HONORABLE GEORGE HOWARD, JR., United States District

1

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

___________

No. 95-3478

___________

Pearlie Creal Pope, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Jesse Brown, Secretary of * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Veteran's Affairs, et al., *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: June 19, 1996

 Filed: June 26, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Pearlie Creal Pope appeals from the district court's order

1

dismissing her employment discrimination suit, based on her failure to

timely file the complaint. After carefully reviewing the record and the

parties' briefs, we conclude that dismissal of the complaint was correct.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7727

MARK K. HYLTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of Virginia Corrections; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH

OF VIRGINIA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-98-329-7)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark K. Hylton, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen B. Martin, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mark Keith Hylton seeks to appeal from the district court’s

order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his

petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999).

With his motion for reconsideration, Hylton presented an affidavit,

which he contends constitutes new evidence of his innocence. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Hylton v. Angelone, No. CA-98-329-7 (W.D. Va. Dec. 17,

1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# L_2007075EN.01002601.xml

| 15.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 75/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 75/26

---

Corrigendum to Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA of 18 December 2006 on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 386 of 29 December 2006
  )

On page 94, Article 11(1):

for:

‘... to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision before 19 December 2006 ...’,

read:

‘... to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision before 19 December 2008 ...’;

and on page 94, Article 11(2):

| (a) | second phrase:







  for | : | ‘..., the Commission shall, before 19 December 2006, submit a report to the Council ...’, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| read | : | ‘..., the Commission shall, before 19 December 2010, submit a report to the Council ...’; |

(a)

second phrase:

for

:

‘..., the Commission shall, before 19 December 2006, submit a report to the Council ...’,

read

:

‘..., the Commission shall, before 19 December 2010, submit a report to the Council ...’;

| (b) | third phrase:







  for | : | ‘The Council shall before 19 December 2006 assess ...’, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| read | : | ‘The Council shall before 19 December 2011 assess ...’; |

(b)

third phrase:

for

:

‘The Council shall before 19 December 2006 assess ...’,

read

:

‘The Council shall before 19 December 2011 assess ...’;

On page 95, Article 12(6):

for:

‘6.   Member States shall no later than 19 December 2006, notify the Council and the Commission ...’;

read:

‘6.   Member States shall no later than 19 December 2007, notify the Council and the Commission ...’.

---