alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re Petition of SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS, SIGMA DELTA CHI, UTAH CHAPTER, KUTV, Inc., KSL-TV, KTVX, KUED and KBYU.

No. 20269.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Oct. 14, 1987.

Patrick A. Shea and Randy L. Dryer, Salt Lake City, for petitioners.

PER CURIAM:

The petitioners were granted a one-year experimental period for the modification of canons 3A(7) and 3A(8) of the Utah Code of Judicial Conduct,1 which prohibit “broadcasting, televising, or recording in the courtroom and areas immediately adjacent thereto during sessions of court or recesses between sessions” and “taking photographs (including motion picture and videotape),” respectively. Those canons were suspended only with respect to proceedings in the Supreme Court. The petitioners have asked for a one-year extension of that ruling, and this Court hereby grants said extension. The guidelines set forth in *In*
      *461
      *re Society of Professional*Journalists2 shall remain in full force and effect.

. *In re Society of Professional Journalists,*727 P.2d 198 (Utah 1986).

. *Id.*at 200.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE02898

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
#### In the Matter of Ronald Martin, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin III, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

In this proceeding, petitioner challenges the determination finding him guilty of possessing and distributing drugs primarily on the ground that the Hearing Officer failed to make his own assessment of the confidential informants’ credibility. However, the Hearing Officer personally interviewed one of the informants and the record establishes that this informant’s testimony was sufficiently detailed to allow the Hear*1040ing Officer to assess his credibility and to form a basis for the finding of guilt *(see, Matter of McClean v LeFevre,*142 AD2d 911; *Matter of Harris v Coughlin,*116 AD2d 896, *lv denied*67 NY2d 610, 1047). Furthermore, while the misbehavior report did not set forth the precise time and date of petitioner’s drug transactions, it was more than adequate to inform petitioner of the specific charge against him to enable him to prepare a defense *(see, Matter of Vogelsang v Coombe,*105 AD2d 913, *affd*66 NY2d 835). As we have previously noted, greater detail may not always be possible if it is necessary to keep the information confidential to protect security interests *(see, Matter of Bryant v Mann,*160 AD2d 1086, *lv denied*76 NY2d 706). Here, any more detail could have disclosed the identity of the informant. Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
```

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

            We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in the  Registration
Statements (Nos. 333-06705, 333-30042, 333-89096 and 333-114898) on Form S-8 and
in the  Registration  Statement (No.  333-99201) on Form S-3 of our report dated
August 18, 2004 for the years  ended June 30,  2002,  2003 and 2004,  and to the
addition of our firm under the caption  "Experts" in the Prospectus,  insofar as
it relates to our report on the financial  statements  for the three years ended
June 30, 2004.

                                     /s/ Margolin Winer & Evens LLP
                                     ----------------------------------
                                     Margolin, Winer & Evens LLP

Garden City, New York
September 13, 2004
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JOHN ANTHONY VEGA,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 410 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# Dates and Times:

 Wednesday, March 21, 2012, at 10 a.m.

# Place: 

Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

# Status:

 Closed.

## Matters To Be Considered

### Wednesday, March 21, at 10 a.m. (Closed)

1. Strategic Issues.

2. Financial Matters.

3. Pricing.

4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.

5. Governors' Executive Session—Discussion of prior agenda items and Board Governance.

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-5327 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-10-P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18. U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Report of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (the Bank) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Gilleran, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006              
|                                     
|/s/ James E. Gilleran                
|James E. Gilleran                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of the Parental Rights to T.R. and J.S., a/k/a J.T.S., Minors. P.R., a/k/a P.S., Appellant, (Respondent), v. Charles W. SHANNON, Director of the Department of Public Assistance and Social Services in and for Big Horn County, Appellee (Petitioner).

No. 86-174.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Oct. 8, 1986.

John W. Davis, Davis, Donnell, Worrall & Bancroft, P.C., Worland, for appellant (respondent).

A.G. McClintock, Atty. Gen., Peter J. Mulvaney, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Richard E. Dixon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee (petitioner).

Before, THOMAS, C.J., and BROWN, CARDINE, URBIGKIT and MACY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

An appeal from a parental-termination decision for two young children initiated by the Big Horn County Department of Assistance and Social Services, is now before this court by brief of the appellant mother, and confession of error by the Attorney General.

Expressly contrary to *Matter of Parental Rights to Child X,*Wyo., 617 P.2d 1078 (1980), and provisions of § 14-3-211(a), W.S. 1977, 1986 Replacement, as therein construed, no guardian ad litem for the children was appointed to represent the minors’ best interest in the parental-rights termination litigation.

Consistent with our earlier decision, this court in noting that the proceedings below were fatally defective remands the case to the district court where a guardian ad litem shall be appointed and a new trial conducted.

This jurisdictional disposition does not invoke analysis or consideration by this court of substantive evidentiary issues discussed in the brief by the appellant to which the State did not have an opportunity to respond. Those concerns can be comprehensively reconsidered at retrial, with benefit of the additional briefing and review by the litigants.

Reversed and remanded for retrial.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1786 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ski boots, cross 

country ski footwear, and snowboard boots. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 14, 2009 

Mr. LEAHY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ski 

boots, cross country ski footwear, and snowboard boots. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SKI BOOTS, CROSS COUNTRY SKI 

4 FOOTWEAR, AND SNOWBOARD BOOTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.64.04 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain ski boots, cross country ski footwear, and 

8 snowboard boots) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1786 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-2152

___________________________

Nhut Le; Chai M. Le

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff

v.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Schiller & Adam, P.A.; JamesJ. Pauly; Divine N. Difongwa

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

Sidney Jintara Yang; Wells Fargo & Company

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants

Rebecca Schiller; Sarah J.B. Adam; Jeffrey D. Klobucar

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: March 6, 2015

Filed: March 13, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________
Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Nhut Le and Chai M. Le appeal fromthe order of the District Court dismissing 1

their complaint. Following careful de novo review, we agree with the District Court

that the Les’ complaint—which was devoid of factual allegations and contained only

conclusory legal theories about improprietiessurrounding the foreclosure sale oftheir

home and the underlying loan-related documents—failed to state a claim upon which

relief could be granted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556

U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (“To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain

sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible

on its face.’” (citation to quoted case omitted)); Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550

U.S. 544, 555 (2007); Topchian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 760 F.3d 843, 848

(8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review). We have considered the Les’ other arguments

for reversal and find them to be without merit. We therefore affirm the judgment of

the District Court.

______________________________

The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the

1

District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Jeffrey J. Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth Fund III, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, H. Kerr Taylor, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, in the capacity as an officer of the General Partner of the company,
that, to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

|      |                  |  |       |                                                                                                                                                                
|----- | ---------------- |  | ----- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: | August 14,
 2009 |  | By:   | /s/ H. Kerr
 Taylor                                                                                                                                            
|      |                  |  | Name: | H. Kerr
 Taylor                                                                                                                                                
|      |                  |  | Title | President and Chief Executive Officer of AmREIT Monthly
 Income & Growth III Corporation, the General Partner of
 AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III, Ltd.



---
Form of Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 [Company letterhead] 
 December     , 2006 
 Via Hand Delivery 
 [Name] 
  

	 	Re:	Change in Control Payment 

 Dear [Name]: 
 Reference is made to Section 3 of your Change in Control Agreement entered into on
[            ], 2006 (the “Change in Control Agreement”), pursuant to which you are entitled to receive certain payments and benefits as described in Sections 3.1.1, 3.1.2. and
3.1.3 of the Change in Control Agreement, in the event you are terminated by the Company without Cause or if you resign for Good Reason during the period commencing on the 30th day immediately preceding a “Change in Control” and ending on the first anniversary of the Change in Control (hereinafter referred to as the
“Change in Control Payment”). The purpose of this letter is to memorialize your agreement with the Company, as authorized by the Compensation Committee of our Board, to vary the application of Section 3 of your Change in Control
Agreement. Except as otherwise noted herein, capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as is set forth in your Change in Control Agreement. 
 Specifically, your right to receive the Change in Control Payment will be triggered solely upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, and you will no longer be required to experience a termination of employment as an
additional condition to trigger such payment. 
 The changes to your Change in Control Agreement, as described herein, are being made
pursuant to and in accordance with the new rules governing non-qualified deferred compensation as promulgated under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Specifically, certain transition relief
provided under the proposed regulations to Section 409A of the Code permits modifications to be made to the timing and form of certain payments subject to Section 409A of the Code (i.e., the Change in Control Payment) during calendar year
2006, to the extent the time and form of such payments are payable, but for the modification, after calendar year 2006. 
 Except as
otherwise expressly modified under this letter, all other terms and conditions of your Change in Control Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 
 This letter merges and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous discussions, agreements and understandings of every nature regarding the Change in Control Payment and may not be changed or modified, except by an
agreement in writing signed by you and an authorized representative of the Company. 







 Intended to be legally bound, please acknowledge that this letter reflects our agreement by signing in
the space provided below and returning the original to me. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	  
  

	[Name]
	[Title]


 Acknowledged and agreed on 
 this      day of December, 2006: 
  

	
	  

	[Name]
<PAGE>

           Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Statement of Additional Information
and the incorporation by reference therein and to the use of our report dated
February 27, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of IDS
Life Insurance Company (name subsequently changed to RiverSource Life
Insurance Company) and to the use of our report dated March 31, 2006 with
respect to the financial statements of American Enterprise Variable Annuity
Account (name subsequently changed to RiverSource Variable Annuity Account) in
the Initial Registration Statement on Form N-4 for the registration of the
RiverSource Signature(SM) One Select Variable Annuity offered by RiverSource
Life Insurance Company.

                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                     Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 2, 2007
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132256 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132256 

 COA: 268261 

Hillsdale CC: 02-021840-FC 

TERRENCE VERNELL WILLIAMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

KELLY, J., would remand this case for a hearing pursuant to People v Ginther, 390 

Mich 436 (1973). 

p0117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 24, 2007 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 153 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 153

   To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Arizona 
                         National Scenic Trail.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2009

  Mr. McCain (for himself and Mr. Kyl) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Arizona 
                         National Scenic Trail.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Arizona National Scenic Trail Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF ARIZONA NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(27) Arizona national scenic trail.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Arizona National Scenic 
                Trail, extending approximately 807 miles across the 
                State of Arizona from the U.S.-Mexico international 
                border to the Arizona-Utah border, as generally 
                depicted on the map entitled `Arizona National Scenic 
                Trail' and dated December 5, 2007, to be administered 
                by the Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with 
                the Secretary of the Interior and appropriate State, 
                tribal, and local governmental agencies.
                    ``(B) Availability of map.--The map shall be on 
                file and available for public inspection in appropriate 
                offices of the Forest Service.''.
                                 <all>
```