alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w1



 





EXHIBIT 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     This First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into
December 29, 2006, to be effective January 1, 2007, by and between Michael D. Rumbolz (the
“Executive”), an individual, and Cash Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation.


RECITALS




	 	A.	 	The Company desires to continue to employ the Executive as the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer beyond the term of the original Executive Employment
Agreement, dated December 22, 2004, which has a termination date of December 31, 2006.
	 
	 	B.	 	The Company is currently reviewing its entire compensation program during
this time with the assistance of a consultant and wants to complete this review to
incorporate any suggested compensation elements into a new contract with Executive.






NOW THEREFORE, inconsideration of the foregoing Recitals, and for other good, fair and
valuable consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the Company and
the Executive agree as follows:


ARTICLE I




1.1 TERM OF EMPLOYEMENT. The term of the Agreement is hereby amended to add a new termination date of March 31, 2007.


The remainder of this page is left blank intentionally.



 









 







ARTICLE II




2.1 All other terms and conditions of the Executive Employment Agreement dated December 22,
2004, shall remain in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first
written above.



	 
 	 	 	 	 
	CASH SYSTEMS, INC.

 
 	 	 
	By  	/s/ Patricia Becker
 	 	 
	 	Patricia Becker, Chair 	 	 
	 	Compensation Committee 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	By  	/s/ Michael D. Rumbolz
 	 	 
	 	Michael D. Rumbolz
***EXHIBIT 32 (b)***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANICAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Mistral Ventures, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Kent Carasquero, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (3) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the registrant for the period covered by this Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Kent Carasquero

Kent Carasquero 

Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 14, 2008

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

48
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 33 

Commemorating the 150th anniversary of Emporia State University. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2013 

Mr. MORAN (for himself and Mr. ROBERTS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 150th anniversary of Emporia State 

University. 

Whereas, in 1863, the State of Kansas founded the Kansas 

State Normal School to provide opportunities for higher 

education in the fields of teaching, mechanic arts, agriculture, and various other arts and sciences; 

Whereas the Kansas State Normal School became the Kansas 

State Teachers College in 1923, Emporia Kansas State 

College in 1974, and Emporia State University in 1977; 

Whereas Emporia State University has prepared thousands 

of teachers in the United States through its nationally 

acclaimed teacher education programs; 

Whereas Emporia State University is the host of the National Teachers Hall of Fame, which recognizes and honVerDate Mar 15 2010 18:10 Feb 14, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR33.ATS SR33

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 33 ATS 

ors exceptional career educators from throughout the 

United States; 

Whereas Emporia State University offers outstanding and 

highly accredited programs, including programs in education, business, and library and information management; 

Whereas Emporia State University is the alma mater of more 

than 75,000 proud alumni; and 

Whereas the quality of Emporia State University as an institution of higher learning is a reflection of the extraordinary caliber of its educational professionals and students: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes and extends its 

2 congratulations to the educational professionals, students, 

3 and alumni of Emporia State University for 150 years of 

4 excellence in higher education. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Fw: Interagency Comments on EGU MACT RobertJ Wayland to: tsirigotis.peter
11/28/2011 10:03 PM Cc: blake.wendy, Paul Versace, Bill Maxwell, Nick Hutson, Mary Johnson, Kevin Culligan, wegman.lydia

FYI - attached are the initial set of interagency comments on MATS.

----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/28/2011 10:01 PM

----- From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
Date: 11/28/2011 09:33 PM Subject: Interagency Comments on EGU MACT

Hi Bob,

Attached you will find the interagency comments on the EGU MACT preamble and RIA. Also attached is a supplemental document referenced in the comments. Finally, a redline of the preamble is also attached that contains comments that are not included in the interagency comments

document.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,
Cortney
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Wauwatosa Holdings (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas S. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
   (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
   
   /s/ Douglas S.
Gordon
 Douglas
S. Gordon
 Chief
Executive Officer
 May 9,
2008
   A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Wauwatosa Holdings, Inc. and will be
retained by Wauwatosa Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 4.3

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

                     T.T.I. TEAM TELECOM INTERNATIONAL LTD.

                         2004 EMPLOYEE SHARE OPTION PLAN

     T.T.I. Team Telecom International Ltd., a company organized under the laws
of the State of Israel (the "COMPANY"), originally adopted the TTI Team Telecom
International Ltd. 2004 Employee Share Option Plan (as amended from time to
time, the "PLAN") effective as of December 29, 2004. Section 13.2 of the Plan
allows the Board of Directors of the Company to amend the Plan in certain
respects at any time or from time to time, subject to the approval of the
Shareholders of the Company if such is required by applicable law or
regulations.

     In order to amend the Plan in certain respects, an amendment to the Plan
has been adopted by a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company on
June 20, 2006, and was approved by the shareholders of the Company on August 10,
2006, effective as of such date. This First Amendment to the Plan, together with
the Plan, constitutes the entire Plan as amended to date.

     1. Effective as of August 10, 2006, the first sentence of Section 6 of the
Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

     "6. RESERVED SHARES. The total number of Shares that may be subject to
     Options granted under this Plan shall not exceed 1,500,000 in the
     aggregate, subject to adjustments as provided in Section 11 hereof."

                                   ----------

Executed on August 10, 2006

T.T.I. TEAM TELECOM INTERNATIONAL LTD.

By:

---------------------------------------------
Title: Meir Lipshes, CEO and Israel Ofer, CFO
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 56 (Friday, March 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 17634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06556]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meetings of the Colorado Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that an orientation meeting 
and a planning meeting of the Colorado Advisory Committee to the 
Commission will convene at 10:00 a.m. (MDT) on Thursday, April 11, 
2013, at Denver Place, 999 18th Street, South Terrace 2nd Floor 
Conference Room, Denver, CO 80202. The meetings are to conduct an 
orientation and for project planning.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Monday, May 13, 
2013. Comments may be mailed to the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, 
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 999-18th Street, Suite 1380 South, 
Denver, CO 80202, faxed to 303-866-1050, or emailed to 
ebohor@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may contact 
the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at 303-866-1040.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Rocky 
Mountain Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, as they become available, both 
before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this 
advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at the 
above phone number, email or street address.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, on March 18, 2013.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2013-06556 Filed 3-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-3221

___________________________ Reginald L. Dunahue lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. William F. Straughn, Deputy Director, ADC; Maurice Culclager, Warden, Brickeys, ADC; C. Johnson, Assistant Warden, Brickeys Max, ADC; Marcus Etherly, Captain, Brickeys Max, ADC; Richardson, Assistant Warden, Brickeys Max, ADC; Stephanie Palmer, Sgt., Brickeys Max, ADC; White, Sgt., Brickeys Max, ADC; Westbrook, Sgt., Brickeys Max, ADC; Tyrone Allison, Sgt./Major, Brickeys Max, ADC; Erma Bell, Captain, Brickeys Max, ADC; James Shipman, Warden, Brickeys, ADC; Moses Jackson, Warden, Brickeys Max, ADC; Swiney, Captain, Brickeys Max, ADC;

Dexter Payne, Director, ADC lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

____________ Submitted: April 16, 2024 Filed: April 19, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before BENTON, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________PER CURIAM.

In this pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Reginald Dunahue appeals the district court’s 1 orders dismissing some of his claims for improper joinder and granting summary judgment on the remaining claims. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Strandlund v. Hawley , 532 F.3d 741, 745 (8th Cir. 2008) (reviewing dismissal for misjoinder under abuse of discretion standard); Townsend v. Murphy , 898 F.3d 780, 783 (8th Cir. 2018) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Dunahue’s motion for appointment of counsel as moot.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the recommended disposition of the Honorable Edie R. Ervin, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID CHAVIRA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00128-CR

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20120D03609)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter’s third request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Reporter’s Record until July 21, 2015. NO FURTHER REQUESTS 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Leticia D. Perez, Court Reporter for the 41th District Court, 

for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record for the above styled and numbered 

cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before July 21, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of June, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report of FCB Bancorp (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report).

I, Romolo Santarosa, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 14, 2006



By:

/s/ Romolo SantarosaRomolo SantarosaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
SCWC-14-0001090

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAI‘I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

KEAKA MARTIN, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________ 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-14-0001090; 3PC131000062)

ORDER OF CORRECTION

(By: McKenna, J.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court,

filed April 22, 2020, is corrected as follows: 

On page 32, line 16, the word “identify” is corrected 

to read “identity.” 

The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all 

necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of this 

change. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, April 23, 2020. 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

Associate Justice

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-14-0001090

23-APR-2020

10:10 AM
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements No. 333-62181 of Union Pacific Resources
Group Inc. on Form S-3 and No. 333-22613 and No. 333-35641 of Union Pacific
Resources Group, Inc. on Form S-8, of our report dated February 2, 2000 on the
combined financial statements of Black Butte Coal Company, A Joint Venture, and
R-K Leasing Company as of December 31, 1999 and December 26, 1998 and for the
fiscal years then ended, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Union
Pacific Resources Group, Inc.

                                             /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 23, 2000
Orusevic v. Fletcher Allen, No. S0037-02 Cncv (Katz , J., Aug. 23, 2004)

[The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is un official. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial cou rt opinion database is not guaranteed.]

STATE OF VERMONT
Chittenden County, ss. :

ORUSEVIC

v.

FLETCHER ALLEN

ENTRY (Motion in Limine)

Evidence Rule 103(a)(1) requires a timely objectio n “stating the specific grounds of objection.” Here, defense coun sel timely stated “objection,” but gave no more explanation.

In the context of depositions, it is common for at torneys to simply “object.” Mostly this is to the form of the questi on, “an invocation of discretion.” 21 C. Wright & K. Graham, Federal Pra ctice and Procedure § 5036, at 176 (1977). Although this was explicitly not a discoverydeposition, but one for the preservation of testimo ny, How was plaintiff

counsel to know the objection was more than a merel y discretionary invocation to the form of the question? He could h ave asked. Knowing counsel, we assume he would have been told. But, t he law should not be based on a small-town judge’s presuming to know wel l his steady

customers.

The situation here objected to was counsel’s failu re to phrase questions in terms of “the standard of care.” Inde ed, it could probably have been cured by a single prefatory comment: “Dr. Depo nent, whatever question I may ask, assume it is in reference to th e standard of care.” Defense counsel could also easily have stated, “Obj ection; question posed in terms of what deponent would have done, not in t erms of the standard of
care.”

In the context of a preservation deposition, we co nclude that Evidence Rule 103(a)(1) must apply. See In re Diet Drugs , 2000 WL 876900, at *7 (E.D.Pa.) (noting that preservation d epositions are subject to
the Rules of Evidence as well as issues of state su bstantive law); Basham v.
Clark , 115 Wash.App. 1024 (Wash.App. 2003) (upholding ex clusion of testimony from a preservation deposition based on t imely, specific, and constructive objections). Defense counsel had the obligation to state the specific grounds of the objection. State v. Bisson ette , 145 Vt. 381, 392 (1985) (“There are three primary purposes for objec tions: to let the opponent correct the error, to inform the court so it can rule intelligently and quickly, and to reduce the necessity for revers al and new trial.”).
Counsel did not. It was not obvious from the conte xt. See 21 Wright & Graham, § 5036, at 174, 179 (discussing the so-call ed “Schwartz proviso” to the rule for when the grounds are apparent). Th is was also not a particularly leading examination. The testimony el icited was notinadmissible hearsay. Stating the grounds at the d eposition would have

been simple, constructive, and not a repetition of the obvious.

Dated at Burlington, Vermont________________, 2004

.

________________________ Judge
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Execute Sports, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
      I, Geno M. Apicella, Chief Executive Officer and Principle Accounting Officer
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      the
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      the
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ Geno
                M.
                ApicellaGeno
                M. Apicella
                Chief
                  Executive Officer and
                Principle
                  Accounting Officer





Dated:
      November 14, 2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.