Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Robert Harrison to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 05:03 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Robert Harrison <rdharrison@mac.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Robert Harrison <rdharrison@mac.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. Robert Harrison

40374 Waterman Rd

Homer, AK 99603-9404
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Jeanette Hanneman to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 05:03 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Jeanette Hanneman <dyrkss@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Jeanette Hanneman <dyrkss@yahoo.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Jeanette Hanneman

PO Box 1118

Seward, AK 99664-1118

(907) 357-7511
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Nina Gondos to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 05:03 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Nina Gondos <ninaninettev@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Nina Gondos <ninaninettev@hotmail.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mrs. Nina Gondos

27 Woodlands Grove

Anchorage, AK 99502
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Renae Thompson to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 05:03 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Renae Thompson <renaejthompson@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Renae Thompson <renaejthompson@yahoo.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Miss Renae Thompson

9731 Vanguard Dr

# 31

Anchorage, AK 99507-4415
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Tom Young to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 05:03 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Tom Young <ravnhous@xyz.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Tom Young <ravnhous@xyz.net>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. Tom Young

1776 Saltwater Drive

Homer, AK 99603

(907) 235-4292
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Connie Newman to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 05:03 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Connie Newman <canewman@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Connie Newman <canewman@hotmail.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Connie Newman

PO Box 56

Pelican, AK 99832-0056

(907) 735-1199
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Joan Frankevich to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 05:33 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Joan Frankevich <jfrankevich@npca.org>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Joan Frankevich <jfrankevich@npca.org>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I have been enjoying Denali's clear and awe-inspiring views of

Mt.McKinley for almost 30 years. While Denali's air is very clean, air

pollution problems in the lower 48 (like at Great Smoky Mountains

national park) began with just one power plant. The purpose of the

Clean Air Act is to protect our nation's air quality, especially at

special places like Denali - the only national park in Alaska

classified as a Class 1 area.

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;
please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,

Ms. Joan Frankevich

PO Box 1001

Girdwood, AK 99587-1001

(907) 783-2382
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Nava Sarracino to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 05:33 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Nava Sarracino <navabas@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Nava Sarracino <navabas@hotmail.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Nava Sarracino

1300 W Street, #211

Anchorage, AK 99501
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Marion Townsend to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 05:33 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Marion Townsend <marion_sphinx@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Marion Townsend <marion_sphinx@yahoo.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Marion Townsend

PO Box 244624

Anchorage, AK 99524-4624
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Cathy Hart to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 06:04 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Cathy Hart <cathylynnhart@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Cathy Hart <cathylynnhart@gmail.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters. I am a nature photographer and spend a great deal of time in

Denali National park and understand the value to the state's economy.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Cathy Hart

2200 Jennison Cir

Anchorage, AK 99508-3781

(907) 337-1669
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Mary Helen Stephens to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 06:34 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Mary Helen Stephens <maryhelenstephens@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Mary Helen Stephens <maryhelenstephens@hotmail.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

All of our Nat'l Parks are needing help to obtain Clean Air quality and

to keep it that way. Please read the following and Move in that

direction. Alaska, of all places, should not be affected by haze or bad

air coming from nearby communities.

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.
Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,

Mrs. Mary Helen Stephens

PO Box 1272

Valdez, AK 99686-1272
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Rudy Wittshirk to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 06:34 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Rudy Wittshirk <fromtheland@mtaonline.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Rudy Wittshirk <fromtheland@mtaonline.net>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. Rudy Wittshirk

Mile 11.5 Hatcher Pass Road

Willow, AK 99688

(907) 495-5095
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Dogan Ozkan to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 07:33 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Dogan Ozkan <doanodna@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Dogan Ozkan <doanodna@hotmail.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. Dogan Ozkan

zambak sok. no:8/10 ciftci apt.

dikilitas besiktas

istanbul turkey, AK 997010216
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Robert Sylvester to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 07:33 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Robert Sylvester <hikeak@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Robert Sylvester <hikeak@yahoo.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. Robert Sylvester

PO Box 22487

Juneau, AK 99802-2487

(907) 500-7950
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Leon Koenck to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 07:33 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Leon Koenck <leonkoenck@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Leon Koenck <leonkoenck@hotmail.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. Leon Koenck

200 W 34th Ave # 539

Anchorage, AK 99503-3969

(907) 529-2558
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

R. Jeannine Lyerly to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 07:33 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: "R. Jeannine Lyerly" <rj907l@msn.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to "R. Jeannine Lyerly" <rj907l@msn.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Are we going to be saying: "Oh! You can't see Denali today

because of the smog"? I, as an Alaskan want to keep the air here

as clean and pristine as possible. No coal plants would be best, but

if we must have them, then they must be required to have adequate
haze-limiting controls and be monitored.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,

Miss R. Jeannine Lyerly

PO Box 201313

Anchorage, AK 99520-1313

(907) 279-9257
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Beatriz Lavagnino to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 08:04 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Beatriz Lavagnino <blavagnino@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Beatriz Lavagnino <blavagnino@yahoo.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mrs. Beatriz Lavagnino

PO Box 210536

Anchorage, AK 99521-0536
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Sunny Reed to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 08:34 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Sunny Reed <sunnyindy@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Sunny Reed <sunnyindy@hotmail.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Sunny Reed

2807 McRae Rd

Anchorage, AK 99517-2151
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Claire Lacey to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 08:34 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Claire Lacey <horse_girl63@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Claire Lacey <horse_girl63@yahoo.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Claire Lacey

17100 Feodosia Dr

Anchorage, AK 99516-5319
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Kimberly McConkey to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 08:34 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Kimberly McConkey <tuffykim@aol.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Kimberly McConkey <tuffykim@aol.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Miss Kimberly McConkey

2610 E 42nd Ave Apt 1

Anchorage, AK 99508-5396

(907) 569-5466
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Lorraine Murray to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 09:03 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Lorraine Murray <lfm@alaska.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Lorraine Murray <lfm@alaska.net>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Lorraine Murray

PO Box 210192

Auke Bay, AK 99821-0192

(907) 790-3951
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Gretchen Small to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 09:03 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Gretchen Small <artem1s1a@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Gretchen Small <artem1s1a@yahoo.com>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Gretchen Small

PO Box 9554

Ketchikan, AK 99901-4554
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Cathy Teich to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 09:34 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Cathy Teich <cathyt@mtaonline.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Cathy Teich <cathyt@mtaonline.net>

Mar 20, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Cathy Teich

PO Box 155

Talkeetna, AK 99676-0155

(907) 733-2155
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Nancy Caudill to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 10:04 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Nancy Caudill <nancyc@operamail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Nancy Caudill <nancyc@operamail.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Nancy Caudill

2804 W 29th Ave

Anchorage, AK 99517-1701

(907) 276-4821
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Susan Whitefeather to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 10:04 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Susan Whitefeather <swhitefeather@ak.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Susan Whitefeather <swhitefeather@ak.net>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Dr. Susan Whitefeather

PO Box 3428

Palmer, AK 99645-3428
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Linda Middaugh to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 10:34 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Linda Middaugh <treehugger35@msn.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Linda Middaugh <treehugger35@msn.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Linda Middaugh

8101 Rovenna St

Anchorage, AK 99518-2473

(907) 717-4944
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Vera Paschke to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 11:04 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Vera Paschke <verapaschke@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Vera Paschke <verapaschke@hotmail.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Vera Paschke

2401 Redwood St

Anchorage, AK 99508-3968
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Harry Robinson to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 11:04 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Harry Robinson <harryj@eagle.ptialaska.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Harry Robinson <harryj@eagle.ptialaska.net>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. Harry Robinson

3835 Lee Ct # 3

Juneau, AK 99801-8653

(907) 789-5843
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Richard Anderson to: R10-Public Comments 03/20/2012 11:04 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Richard Anderson <fjord4@acsalaska.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Richard Anderson <fjord4@acsalaska.net>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

Denali is a Class I air quality wilderness national park. As such, its

air quality should not be allowed to degrade.

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.
Sincerely,

Mr. Richard Anderson

2321 Legacy Dr

Anchorage, AK 99516-2643

(907) 522-0202
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

John Nagel to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 12:04 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: John Nagel <freestylin257@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to John Nagel <freestylin257@yahoo.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. John Nagel

3253 Nowell Ave

Juneau, AK 99801-1933
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Tina Brown to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 12:04 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Tina Brown <zerobridgewon@aol.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Tina Brown <zerobridgewon@aol.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Tina Brown

19400 Beardsley Way

Juneau, AK 99801-8218
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Dana Durham to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 12:34 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Dana Durham <dizzydunkin@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Dana Durham <dizzydunkin@hotmail.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Dana Durham

PO Box 1016

Girdwood, AK 99587-1016

(907) 783-1187
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Afrodith Mauropoulou to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 03:04 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Afrodith Mauropoulou <vikimauria@yahoo.gr>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Afrodith Mauropoulou <vikimauria@yahoo.gr>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Miss Afrodith Mauropoulou

Clarks Point

Clarks Point, AK 99569
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Martin Antuna to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 03:34 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Martin Antuna <martinantuna@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Martin Antuna <martinantuna@hotmail.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. Martin Antuna

6416 15th Ct Apt A

Elmendorf Afb, AK 99506-2005
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Shelley True to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 07:35 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Shelley True <sheamctrue@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Shelley True <sheamctrue@hotmail.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Shelley True

HC 60 Box 3409

Haines, AK 99827-9605

(907) 767-5562
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Nina Cornett to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 08:05 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Nina Cornett <ngcornett@aol.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Nina Cornett <ngcornett@aol.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Nina Cornett

PO Box 685

Cooper Landing, AK 99572-0685
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Alan Seegert to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 08:35 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Alan Seegert <zemmo@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Alan Seegert <zemmo@yahoo.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. Alan Seegert

PO Box 203

Denali Park, AK 99755-0203
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Mark Bloch to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 09:05 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Mark Bloch <mbloch18@comcast.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Mark Bloch <mbloch18@comcast.net>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

My wife and I recently had the opportunity to drive from Anchorage to

Fairbanks and our trip took us past Denali and the past th coal

plants. It was a beautiful drive and an extremely cold and clear day.

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to us.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.
Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,

Mr. Mark Bloch

16010 Terracewood Ln

Anchorage, AK 99516-4825

(801) 363-2221
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Linda Bassett to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 10:06 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Linda Bassett <labak8@netscape.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Linda Bassett <labak8@netscape.net>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Linda Bassett

1120 Huffman Rd Ste 24

Pmb 508

Anchorage, AK 99515-3516
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Jos Bakker to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 10:07 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Jos Bakker <josb1214@aol.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Jos Bakker <josb1214@aol.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mrs. Jos Bakker

PO Box 211403

Auke Bay, AK 99821-1403
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Sarah Mangum to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 11:06 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Sarah Mangum <arcticblarney@live.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Sarah Mangum <arcticblarney@live.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Sarah Mangum

411 Fischer Ave # B

Anchorage, AK 99518-1842
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Sarah Mangum to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 11:06 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Sarah Mangum <arcticblarney@live.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Sarah Mangum <arcticblarney@live.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Sarah Mangum

411 Fischer Ave # B

Anchorage, AK 99518-1842
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Laura Asbell to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 12:06 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Laura Asbell <nbagal1@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Laura Asbell <nbagal1@hotmail.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Miss Laura Asbell

PO Box 15002

Fritz Creek, AK 99603-6002
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Jackie Watson to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 12:06 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Jackie Watson <jackie.watson62@yahoo.co.uk>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Jackie Watson <jackie.watson62@yahoo.co.uk>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Jackie Watson

7 Highfield Road

Five Lane Ends

Bradford, AK 76876

(785) 255-9436
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Lorraine Murray to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 12:36 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Lorraine Murray <lfm@alaska.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Lorraine Murray <lfm@alaska.net>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

As an Alaskan I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan and

to please stop exempting Alaskans from the protections offered via

EPA's authority.

The Alaskan people, our wildlife, and the environment all need the help

of EPA's regulations, especially considering how polluted our state

ALREADY is and that many of Alaska's decisions makers tend to favor

development over the health concerns of the public and that of the

environment.

And our state now leads the rest of the country in Toxic Chemical

releases. We need EPA's help to prevent more pollution from spilling

into our environment not allowing more of it to continue.

Coal, Coal Ash is one the worst pollutants, and our state already has

a growing acidification problem. Our marine life and fisheries are also

already suffering from pollution

Please improve your proposal and require greater pollution reductions

from the Healy Coal Power Plants.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,

Ms. Lorraine Murray

PO Box 210192

Auke Bay, AK 99821-0192
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Rob Lund to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 12:36 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Rob Lund <summersong@alaska.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Rob Lund <summersong@alaska.net>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. Rob Lund

4178 Hohe St

Homer, AK 99603-7007
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Barbara Karl to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 12:36 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Barbara Karl <karlbarbara@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Barbara Karl <karlbarbara@hotmail.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Barbara Karl

2400 E 16th Ave

Anchorage, AK 99508-2906

(907) 279-5229
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Mary Ann Swaim to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 12:36 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Mary Ann Swaim <lady_bug_555@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Mary Ann Swaim <lady_bug_555@hotmail.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Mary Ann Swaim

PO Box 2536

Kenai, AK 99611-2536
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Maureen Powers to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 01:39 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Maureen Powers <circlesofrainbows@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Maureen Powers <circlesofrainbows@yahoo.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Maureen Powers

PO Box 2826

Homer, AK 99603-2826
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Tina Williams to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 02:08 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Tina Williams <hillbillybearpaw@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Tina Williams <hillbillybearpaw@yahoo.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mrs. Tina Williams

1051 E Bogard Rd

Wasilla, AK 99654-7174
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Becky Breeding to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 03:39 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Becky Breeding <seadoo_10@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Becky Breeding <seadoo_10@yahoo.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Becky Breeding

PO Box 672569

Chugiak, AK 99567-2569
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Judy Jessee to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 03:39 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Judy Jessee <judy@meyeres.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Judy Jessee <judy@meyeres.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Judy Jessee

1591 Opry Way

Fairbanks, AK 99709-5641
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Rob Clingan to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 05:09 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Rob Clingan <robclingan@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Rob Clingan <robclingan@hotmail.com>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. Rob Clingan

PO Box 39065

Elim, AK 99739-0065
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Shawn O'Donnell to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 07:39 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Shawn O'Donnell <odfamily@acsalaska.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Shawn O'Donnell <odfamily@acsalaska.net>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. Shawn O'Donnell

7539 Eastbrook Cir

Anchorage, AK 99504-3569

(907) 332-0438
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Mike Giannechini to: R10-Public Comments 03/21/2012 09:40 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Mike Giannechini <mikeyg@mtaonline.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Mike Giannechini <mikeyg@mtaonline.net>

Mar 21, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. Mike Giannechini

PO Box 58

Healy, AK 99743-0058

(907) 683-2926
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Eileen Harney to: R10-Public Comments 03/22/2012 02:10 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Eileen Harney <eileen.harney@utoronto.ca>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Eileen Harney <eileen.harney@utoronto.ca>

Mar 22, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Dr. Eileen Harney

PO Box 0199

University of Alaska

Fairbanks, AK 99775-1319

(508) 359-2476
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Samuel Flores to: R10-Public Comments 03/22/2012 10:44 AM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Samuel Flores <samuelfl2001@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Samuel Flores <samuelfl2001@yahoo.com>

Mar 22, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mr. Samuel Flores

PO Box 731

Denali Park, AK 99755-0731

(907) 250-1276
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Tiffany Derenzy to: R10-Public Comments 03/22/2012 04:43 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Tiffany Derenzy <tderenzy@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Tiffany Derenzy <tderenzy@gmail.com>

Mar 22, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Tiffany Derenzy

PO Box 244595

Anchorage, AK 99524-4595
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Renae Thompson to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 02:15 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Renae Thompson <renaejthompson@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Renae Thompson <renaejthompson@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Renae Thompson

9731 Vanguard Dr Apt 16

Anchorage, AK 99507-5308
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Nell Clayton to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 02:15 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Nell Clayton <nell@alaska.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Nell Clayton <nell@alaska.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Nell Clayton

PO Box 2528

Valdez, AK 99686-2528
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Annie Duffy to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 02:19 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Annie Duffy <annie@duffyinfodesign.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Annie Duffy <annie@duffyinfodesign.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Annie Duffy

208 7th Ave

Fairbanks, AK 99701-5034
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Mariah Johnson to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 02:21 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Mariah Johnson <mariahn_99@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Mariah Johnson <mariahn_99@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Mariah Johnson

PO Box 3043

Seward, AK 99664-3043

(978) 314-4093
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Niklaus Lotscher to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 02:45 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Niklaus Lotscher <lotschern@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Niklaus Lotscher <lotschern@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Niklaus Lotscher

PO Box 1741

Homer, AK 99603-1741
ADEC Comment letter on EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Smith, Rebecca T (DEC) to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 02:58 PM

Cc: "Edwards, Alice L S (DEC)", "Kuterbach, John F (DEC)", "Turner, Thomas 

E (DEC)", "Heil, Cynthia L (DEC)", "Williams, Cynthia L (DEC)"

From: "Smith, Rebecca T (DEC)" <rebecca.smith@alaska.gov>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Cc: "Edwards, Alice L S (DEC)" <alice.edwards@alaska.gov>, "Kuterbach, John F (DEC)" 

<john.kuterbach@alaska.gov>, "Turner, Thomas E (DEC)" <tom.turner@alaska.gov>, "Heil, Cynthia L 

(DEC)" <cindy.heil@alaska.gov>, "Williams, Cynthia L (DEC)" <cynthia.williams@alaska.gov>

Attached please find the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation’s comment letter on

EPA‐R10‐OAR‐2011‐0367, EPA’s proposed approval of Alaska’s Regional Haze State Implementation

Plan.

Thank you,

  Rebecca Tyson SmithEPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367 RH SIP letter 3-23-12.pdf
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Angeles Selgas to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 03:15 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Angeles Selgas <gelipondia@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Angeles Selgas <gelipondia@hotmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Angeles Selgas

Fiobre

15165

Bergondo, AK 15165
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Gene Agnew to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 03:22 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Gene Agnew <gragnew@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Gene Agnew <gragnew@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Gene Agnew

9510 N Glenn Hwy

Palmer, AK 99645-8122
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Maryann Clark to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 03:39 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Maryann Clark <maryann.clark@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Maryann Clark <maryann.clark@hotmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Maryann Clark

11601 E Norman Ave

Palmer, AK 99645-9413
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Celestina Simmons to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 04:17 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Celestina Simmons <celess@hageninsurance.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Celestina Simmons <celess@hageninsurance.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Celestina Simmons

7401 Hillside Way

Anchorage, AK 99516-3826

(907) 345-5110
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Mark And Janet Bloch to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 04:19 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Mark And Janet Bloch <mbloch18@comcast.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Mark And Janet Bloch <mbloch18@comcast.net>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Mark And Janet Bloch

16010 Terracewood Ln

Anchorage, AK 99516-4825

(907) 222-2869
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Cheryl Sennett to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 04:20 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Cheryl Sennett <cheryl.sennett@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Cheryl Sennett <cheryl.sennett@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Cheryl Sennett

PO Box 243493

Anchorage, AK 99524-3493
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Kris E. DuBois to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 05:09 PM

Cc: "ckp@aterwynne.com"

From: "Kris E. DuBois" <KEDuBois@gvea.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Cc: "ckp@aterwynne.com" <ckp@aterwynne.com>

Dear EPA – Please find attached, GVEA’s comments on EPA’s evaluation of the Alaska Regional Haze Sate

Implementation Plan published in the Federal Register on February 24, 2012.  

Kristen DuBois

Environmental Officer

Golden Valley Electric Association

758 Illinois St.

Fairbanks, Alaska  99707

Office: 907‐451‐5627

Cell: 907‐388‐6300

EPA AKRHSIP GVEA Comments 032312.pdf
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

SUSAN GRACE BLANDIN to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 05:24 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: SUSAN GRACE BLANDIN <b2nharmony@att.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to SUSAN GRACE BLANDIN <b2nharmony@att.net>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

SUSAN GRACE BLANDIN

PO Box 4234

Palmer, AK 99645-4234
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

John Repass to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 05:48 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: John Repass <juven_29@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to John Repass <juven_29@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

John Repass

414 Mission Rd

Kodiak, AK 99615-6329
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Laura Baldwin to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 05:50 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Laura Baldwin <meanqueens@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Laura Baldwin <meanqueens@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Laura Baldwin

5800 Lake Otis Pkwy Apt J341

Anchorage, AK 99507-1767

ul
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Sophia Myers to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 05:51 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Sophia Myers <cladiopterix_lover@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Sophia Myers <cladiopterix_lover@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Sophia Myers

PO Box 2103

Cordova, AK 99574-2103

(907) 424-5356
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Dennis Kogl to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 05:52 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Dennis Kogl <dennis.kogl@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Dennis Kogl <dennis.kogl@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

Coal fired power plants should be outlawed unless they can meet the

standards of no emissions, like a plant burning hydrogen. We know they

can't do that. Large corporations control our country. We are a long

way from democracy. Until we regain control of our country, we are

basically screwed. Big business will keep skimming off the profits

produced by the workers and keep their wages low. If you think about

that, that makes no sense, because if you don't pay workers they can't

buy industries products, and the plants lay off or shut down.

When you drive to Healy from the south at 40 below F. , you see a

yellow brown smudge in the sky over most of Healy. Pollution from the

power plant is not so visible in summer, although on windless days, the

monitors would pick up particulates.

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.
Sincerely,

Dennis Kogl

PO Box 21

Denali Park, AK 99755-0021
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Frances Levi to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 05:52 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Frances Levi <arachne246@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Frances Levi <arachne246@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Frances Levi

1209 Oxford Dr

Anchorage, AK 99503-6939

(907) 563-1484
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Dana Williams to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 06:21 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Dana Williams <dgwill55@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Dana Williams <dgwill55@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Dana Williams

8913 Eagle Place Loop

Eagle River, AK 99577-8846

(314) 520-6286
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Katherine East to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 07:16 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Katherine East <mukluckathy@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Katherine East <mukluckathy@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Katherine East

1610 Silver Pines Rd

Kenai, AK 99611-9008

(907) 830-7885
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Patricia Gangestad to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 07:17 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Patricia Gangestad <mckinley@gci.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Patricia Gangestad <mckinley@gci.net>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Patricia Gangestad

PO Box 671201

Chugiak, AK 99567-1201

(907) 688-2165
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Keith Merrifield to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 07:20 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Keith Merrifield <kwmerrifield@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Keith Merrifield <kwmerrifield@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Keith Merrifield

PO Box 2163

Wrangell, AK 99929-2163
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Guy Runco to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 08:15 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Guy Runco <southsherman@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Guy Runco <southsherman@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Guy Runco

7908 Chaimi Loop

Anchorage, AK 99504-4692

(303) 931-4328
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

cindy Neubauer to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 08:16 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: cindy Neubauer <bobandcindy@mtaonline.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to cindy Neubauer <bobandcindy@mtaonline.net>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

cindy Neubauer

PO Box 874769

Wasilla, AK 99687-4769

(907) 373-1466
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Alice Labarre to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 08:18 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Alice Labarre <rjlabarre@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Alice Labarre <rjlabarre@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Alice Labarre

4376 Dartmouth Dr Apt 1

Fairbanks, AK 99709-3000
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Rick Steiner to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 08:47 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Rick Steiner <richard.g.steiner@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Rick Steiner <richard.g.steiner@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Rick Steiner

9138 Arlon St Ste A3

Anchorage, AK 99507-3876
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Susan Bright to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 09:16 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Susan Bright <sbright40@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Susan Bright <sbright40@hotmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Susan Bright

2246 Maudest Pl

Anchorage, AK 99508-3740
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Haley Duryea to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 09:17 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Haley Duryea <hali-92@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Haley Duryea <hali-92@hotmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Haley Duryea

7730 McHenry Cir

Anchorage, AK 99502-4474
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Donald Surgeon to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 10:47 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Donald Surgeon <way2drenched@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Donald Surgeon <way2drenched@gmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Donald Surgeon

312 Islander Dr

Sitka, AK 99835-9730

(907) 747-5547
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Karen Todd to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 11:46 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Karen Todd <raisingcanestudio@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Karen Todd <raisingcanestudio@yahoo.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Karen Todd

25 Jefferson Way Ste 102

Ketchikan, AK 99901-5953
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Leslie Hafemeister to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 11:47 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Leslie Hafemeister <anappren@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Leslie Hafemeister <anappren@hotmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Leslie Hafemeister

PO Box 83217

Fairbanks, AK 99708-3217
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Michele Cornelius to: R10-Public Comments 03/23/2012 11:47 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Michele Cornelius <michelescornelius@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Michele Cornelius <michelescornelius@gmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Michele Cornelius

PO Box 739

Homer, AK 99603-0739
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Eileen Harney to: R10-Public Comments 03/24/2012 01:46 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Eileen Harney <eileen.harney@utoronto.ca>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Eileen Harney <eileen.harney@utoronto.ca>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Eileen Harney

PO Box 750199

University of Alaska

Fairbanks, AK 99775-0199

(504) 309-3755
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Nathalie Dupont to: R10-Public Comments 03/24/2012 02:16 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Nathalie Dupont <nathaliequinten@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Nathalie Dupont <nathaliequinten@hotmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Nathalie Dupont

Rue LÃ©on Herman 52

69530

Masbourg, AK 69530
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Maureen Powers to: R10-Public Comments 03/24/2012 12:21 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Maureen Powers <circlesofrainbows@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Maureen Powers <circlesofrainbows@yahoo.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Maureen Powers

PO Box 2826

Homer, AK 99603-2826

(907) 235-1464
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Roland Göttert to: R10-Public Comments 03/24/2012 12:50 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Roland Göttert <roand.goettert@googlemail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Roland Göttert <roand.goettert@googlemail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Roland Göttert

Katzenloch

Kempfeld, MN 55758
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Zachary Neubauer to: R10-Public Comments 03/24/2012 01:18 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Zachary Neubauer <neubauer.zachary@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Zachary Neubauer <neubauer.zachary@gmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Zachary Neubauer

PO Box 874769

Wasilla, AK 99687-4769

(907) 841-1379
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Jeanette Holmgren to: R10-Public Comments 03/24/2012 01:50 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Jeanette Holmgren <howlingwithwolves@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Jeanette Holmgren <howlingwithwolves@gmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Jeanette Holmgren

Strömsegatan 23 A

Boden, AK 96167
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Kathie Livesley to: R10-Public Comments 03/24/2012 07:47 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Kathie Livesley <kathie@mtaonline.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Kathie Livesley <kathie@mtaonline.net>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Kathie Livesley

PO Box 877347

Wasilla, AK 99687-7347

(907) 373-7998
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Mireille Coninx to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 02:18 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Mireille Coninx <mireille.coninx@pandora.be>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Mireille Coninx <mireille.coninx@pandora.be>

Mar 25, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Mireille Coninx

Pelikaanstraat 14

35300

Houthalen Belgium, AK 35300
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Deirdre Booth to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 03:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Deirdre Booth <deirdrebooth@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Deirdre Booth <deirdrebooth@hotmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Deirdre Booth

7440 Tyone Ct

Anchorage, AK 99504-3531
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Diane Zarnetske to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 03:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Diane Zarnetske <dzarnetske@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Diane Zarnetske <dzarnetske@hotmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Diane Zarnetske

836 E 78th Ave

Anchorage, AK 99518-3126
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Judy Engh to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 03:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Judy Engh <judyrae427@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Judy Engh <judyrae427@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism. I also have asthma and like to be able to breathe freely.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Judy Engh

7754 Port Orford Dr

Anchorage, AK 99507-6018

(907) 345-8851
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Dorothy Lazar to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 04:13 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Dorothy Lazar <dlazar@alaska.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Dorothy Lazar <dlazar@alaska.net>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Dorothy Lazar

2781 Seafarer Loop

Anchorage, AK 99516-3555

(907) 348-8789
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Martin Antuna to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 04:13 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Martin Antuna <martinantuna@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Martin Antuna <martinantuna@hotmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Martin Antuna

6416 15th Ct Apt A

Elmendorf Afb, AK 99506-2005

(240) 328-6539
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Linda Bassett to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 04:13 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Linda Bassett <labak8@netscape.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Linda Bassett <labak8@netscape.net>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Linda Bassett

1120 Huffman Rd Ste 24

Pmb 508

Anchorage, AK 99515-3516
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Lance Westing to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 04:13 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Lance Westing <lwesting@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Lance Westing <lwesting@hotmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

As an Alaskan resident it makes absolutely no sense to me to burn coal

with anything but the best technology if coal has to be burned. I

don't know how much the Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit

No. 1 plant ("Healy") coal burning plant will affect the

views in national parks, and this should certainly be considered.

However, adding unnatural levels of mercury to the food chain, from

coal power plant emissions, is very much is a concern to me, especially

since many Alaskans, at least partially, get their food from subistence

resources that are predominantly pretty high up on the food chain when

it comes to aquatic foods like salmon. Alaska is one of the last

places on Earth where almost all of our fish is still safe for pregnant

women and children to eat. This also contributes to the high market

price Alaskan Wild Salmon and other Alaska seafood fetches in the world

market. Lets keep it that way, especially considering that fish

(especially salmon) is one of the best foods for pregnant woman and

children to eat has the omega 3 fatty acids it contains are critical

for proper brain development.

Please subject the Healy coal plant to "Best Available Retrofit

Technology" (BART) limits under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. The

only thing better than this would be to not let coal be burned at all

in a way that releases mercury into the atmosphere. Regardless the EPA

should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Lance Westing

PO Box 622

Kotzebue, AK 99752-0622

(907) 442-4474
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Michael Salzmann to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 04:13 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Michael Salzmann <homerplumber@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Michael Salzmann <homerplumber@gmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Michael Salzmann

39529 Old Sterling Hwy

Anchor Point, AK 99556-9453
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

C X Martinson to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 04:13 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: C X Martinson <martinson@arctic.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to C X Martinson <martinson@arctic.net>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

C X Martinson

310 W 10th Ave

Anchorage, AK 99501-3501

(907) 272-1073
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Carol Seekins to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 04:13 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Carol Seekins <wardseekins@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Carol Seekins <wardseekins@yahoo.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Carol Seekins

PO Box 1073

Willow, AK 99688-1073

(805) 682-5130
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Martin & Christine Niemi to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 05:13 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Martin & Christine Niemi <cmniemi@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Martin & Christine Niemi <cmniemi@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Martin & Christine Niemi

616 Alta Ct

Douglas, AK 99824-5522
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Andy Wilson to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 05:13 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Andy Wilson <andy.wilson@sierraclub.org>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Andy Wilson <andy.wilson@sierraclub.org>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Andy Wilson

1202 San Antonio St

Austin, TX 78701-1834

(512) 477-1729
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Robert Standish to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 05:13 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Robert Standish <bobscabinak@starband.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Robert Standish <bobscabinak@starband.net>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I live in Alaska and care deeply about protecting public health, air

quality at national parks and wilderness areas, and local economies

supported by recreation and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Robert Standish

PO Box 1106

Kenai, AK 99611-1106

(907) 283-7594
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Jedediah Smith to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 05:13 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Jedediah Smith <akjed@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Jedediah Smith <akjed@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Jedediah Smith

4215 Spenard Rd

Anchorage, AK 99517-2905

(907) 978-4318
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Morgan Macconaugha to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 05:13 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Morgan Macconaugha <theosophy369@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Morgan Macconaugha <theosophy369@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Morgan Macconaugha

PO Box 113357

Anchorage, AK 99511-3357

(907) 344-7374
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Joann Varner to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 05:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Joann Varner <shmu@mtaonline.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Joann Varner <shmu@mtaonline.net>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Joann Varner

PO Box 3336

Palmer, AK 99645-3336

(907) 746-7464
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

erlaitz goikoetxea to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 05:15 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: erlaitz goikoetxea <iraultzak@yahoo.es>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to erlaitz goikoetxea <iraultzak@yahoo.es>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

erlaitz goikoetxea

donostia

DONOSTIA, NY 20001
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Linda McNamara to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 05:15 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Linda McNamara <ljmcout@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Linda McNamara <ljmcout@hotmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Linda McNamara

525 McKee Farm Rd

Fairbanks, AK 99712-3647

(907) 687-5117
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Rob Clingan to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 05:15 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Rob Clingan <robclingan@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Rob Clingan <robclingan@hotmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Rob Clingan

PO Box 39065

Elim, AK 99739-0065

(907) 890-2041
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

William Everett to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 05:15 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: William Everett <aestevalis_0@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to William Everett <aestevalis_0@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

William Everett

1055 W 27th Ave

Anchorage, AK 99503-2423
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Don Soileau to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Don Soileau <donsoileau@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Don Soileau <donsoileau@hotmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

I have been working as a tour guide in Denali National Park for the

past thirty years and can unequivocally state that clean air and an

unimpaired viewshed are critical elements in a visitor's experience of

the park.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Don Soileau

645 G St

# 530

Anchorage, AK 99501-3443

(907) 272-3010

RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Jeffrey Sbonek to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Jeffrey Sbonek <jfsbonttearth@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Jeffrey Sbonek <jfsbonttearth@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey Sbonek

PO Box 16

Point Baker, AK 99927-0016
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

LILLIAN WITHEY to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: LILLIAN WITHEY <with@gci.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to LILLIAN WITHEY <with@gci.net>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

LILLIAN WITHEY

1521 Beaver Pl

Anchorage, AK 99504-2516
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Megan Donhauser to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Megan Donhauser <nervoona@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Megan Donhauser <nervoona@gmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Megan Donhauser

2625 W 67th Ave

Anchorage, AK 99502-2220
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Lynnda Strong to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Lynnda Strong <lynndastrong@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Lynnda Strong <lynndastrong@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Lynnda Strong

2309 Halibut Point Rd Spc 34

Sitka, AK 99835-9641

(907) 747-5098
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Ann Yates to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Ann Yates <annkyates@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Ann Yates <annkyates@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Ann Yates

3231 E 43rd Ave

Anchorage, AK 99508-5424
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Zeke Hilsinger to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Zeke Hilsinger <zhilsinger@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Zeke Hilsinger <zhilsinger@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

Why not use alcohol all motors diesel, gas, 2 cycle or 4 are able to be

converted. Emissions from alcohol is co2 and oxygen, much cleaner then

fossil fuels. Heck even if we just added 15% denatured alcohol to

current gas motors you would save around 75% of emissions. Also alcohol

can be locally produced at a cost of no more then $1.30 a gallon.

People seem to want to get rich at the cost of whatever; my kids life,

your life my life. Anyway you look at it fossil fuels are uneconomical,

environmentally hazardous and will only lead us to destruction of our

species and possibly the rest of the life on our one and only planet

EARTH.

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Zeke Hilsinger
PO Box 377

Sutton, AK 99674-0377
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Steven Oyler to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Steven Oyler <greybar_2000@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Steven Oyler <greybar_2000@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Steven Oyler

4620 Reka Dr Apt B17

Anchorage, AK 99508-3617

(907) 339-9242
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Mark Kline to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:45 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Mark Kline <mkline@gci.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Mark Kline <mkline@gci.net>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Mark Kline

3754 Mitchell Ave

Fairbanks, AK 99709-4635

(907) 451-6822
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Elvira Paschke to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:45 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Elvira Paschke <verapaschke@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Elvira Paschke <verapaschke@hotmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Alaska has beem my home for 34 years and durin this time, I have

experienced and observed, with increasing concern, the impact on air

quality.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Elvira Paschke

2401 Redwood St

Anchorage, AK 99508-3968

(907) 277-4824
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Colleen Heberer to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:45 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Colleen Heberer <colleenheberer@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Colleen Heberer <colleenheberer@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Colleen Heberer

12303 Lake St

Eagle River, AK 99577-7637

(907) 622-5275
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Zoe Goldstein to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:45 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Zoe Goldstein <handz@helpamate.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Zoe Goldstein <handz@helpamate.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Zoe Goldstein

603/98 Maroubra Rd

Maroubra

Sydney, AK 11111

(612) 934-4773
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Peter J. Keiser to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:45 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: "Peter J. Keiser" <peterjkeiser@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to "Peter J. Keiser" <peterjkeiser@yahoo.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Peter J. Keiser

N. Douglas I.

Juneau, AK 99802
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Rudy De Bock to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:45 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Rudy De Bock <debockrudy@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Rudy De Bock <debockrudy@gmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Rudy De Bock

Zonnebloemstraat

9600

Ronse, AK 99615

(325) 521-4871
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Dogan Ozkan to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:45 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Dogan Ozkan <doanodna@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Dogan Ozkan <doanodna@hotmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Dogan Ozkan

Zambak Sok. No:8/10 Ciftci Apt

Dikilitas Besiktas

Istanbul Turkey, AK 99701-2160

(538) 517-1715
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Rudy Wittshirk to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:45 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Rudy Wittshirk <fromtheland@mtaonline.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Rudy Wittshirk <fromtheland@mtaonline.net>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Rudy Wittshirk

Mile 11.5 Hatcher Pass Rd.

Willow, AK 99688

(907) 495-5095
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Laura Dodge to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 07:44 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Laura Dodge <dodge_laura@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Laura Dodge <dodge_laura@yahoo.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Laura Dodge

65 Preston St Apt 3

Providence, RI 02906-3816
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Brian Vincent to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 08:49 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Brian Vincent <brianinalaska@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Brian Vincent <brianinalaska@gmail.com>

Mar 25, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Brian Vincent

PO Box 874794

Wasilla, AK 99687-4794
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Cynthia Hovland to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:16 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Cynthia Hovland <cynthiahovland@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Cynthia Hovland <cynthiahovland@gmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Cynthia Hovland

PO Box 15

Seward, AK 99664-0015
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Becky Myrvold to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:16 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Becky Myrvold <bjmyrvold@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Becky Myrvold <bjmyrvold@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Becky Myrvold

PO Box 938

Palmer, AK 99645-0938

(907) 745-1620
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Avia Aspelund to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:16 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Avia Aspelund <aspelund.aas@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Avia Aspelund <aspelund.aas@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Avia Aspelund

810 E 42nd Ave

Apt H

Anchorage, AK 99503-6042
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Kristel Clark to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:16 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Kristel Clark <kalaska64@aol.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Kristel Clark <kalaska64@aol.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Kristel Clark

4812 Kupreanof St

Anchorage, AK 99507-1013

(907) 529-1116
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Aio Gw to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:19 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Aio Gw <aio_01@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Aio Gw <aio_01@hotmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Aio Gw

The World

The Earth, AK 38000
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Michelle Wilson Nordhoff to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:19 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Michelle Wilson Nordhoff <michelle@ak.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Michelle Wilson Nordhoff <michelle@ak.net>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

As a long-time Alaskan resident, I care deeply about protecting my

state's public health, air quality at national parks and wilderness

areas, and local economies supported by recreation and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Michelle Wilson Nordhoff

8711 Pluto Dr

Anchorage, AK 99507-3738
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Amy Snider to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:48 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Amy Snider <amy@akmarine.org>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Amy Snider <amy@akmarine.org>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I am a Healy land owner and Alaskan concerned about air quality in the

Interior, please protect our health and environment!

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Amy Snider

General Delivery

Anchorage, AK 99501-9999

(907) 322-3273
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Melea Roed to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:48 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Melea Roed <melea.roed@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Melea Roed <melea.roed@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Melea Roed

PO Box 1193

Chickaloon, AK 99674-1193
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Della Dempsey to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:49 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Della Dempsey <dladmc@peopleagainstbs.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Della Dempsey <dladmc@peopleagainstbs.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Della Dempsey

8530 W Waldal Cir

Wasilla, AK 99623-4110

(907) 892-5876
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Rick Bennent to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:49 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Rick Bennent <rick.bennent@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Rick Bennent <rick.bennent@gmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Rick Bennent

PO Box 1034

Skagway, AK 99840-1034
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Jan St.Peters to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:49 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: "Jan St.Peters" <lakeotto@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to "Jan St.Peters" <lakeotto@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

Being a resident of where the coal mine is located, i will say that

their track record has been good so far. However, there is no such

thing as clean coal. And Usibelli wants to pursue coal bed methane in

our area too. The idle power plant needs to be developed with current

clean air standards enforced.

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Jan St.Peters

PO Box 323

Healy, AK 99743-0323
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Robert Caywood to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:49 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Robert Caywood <cmmgen@mtaonline.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Robert Caywood <cmmgen@mtaonline.net>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

I have hunted and fished this area for over 25 years and have never

seen any sign of poulition in the area,I am talking about all around

the whole park. I have snowmachined around the park and seen only pure

white snow. I would say somebody is trying to blow smoke up somebodies

rear end.

Sincerely,

Robert Caywood

PO Box 774042

Eagle River, AK 99577-4042
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Angelika Fey-Merritt to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:49 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Angelika Fey-Merritt <afmge@earthlink.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Angelika Fey-Merritt <afmge@earthlink.net>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Angelika Fey-Merritt

1600 Beaver Pl

Anchorage, AK 99504-2519
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Lindsey Hajduk to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:49 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Lindsey Hajduk <lhajduk@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Lindsey Hajduk <lhajduk@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

Denali, like many National Parks across the country is extremely

important to Americans. I don't know what like would be like if you

couldn't see "the mountain" from Anchorage hundreds of miles

away. We need to make sure we're taking care of the air around all our

national parks, not to mention everywhere, for innumerable reasons:

aesthetics, health, recreation, and more.

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Lindsey Hajduk

750 W 2nd Ave

Ste 100

Anchorage, AK 99501-2167

RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Janet Wass to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:49 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Janet Wass <janetinghana@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Janet Wass <janetinghana@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Janet Wass

3932 Robin St

Anchorage, AK 99504-4679
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Nj Gates to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:49 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Nj Gates <sayitsister1949@fastmail.fm>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Nj Gates <sayitsister1949@fastmail.fm>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Nj Gates

PO Box 43

Denali Park, AK 99755-0043

(907) 683-5444
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Marion Tillmann to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Marion Tillmann <mt7357@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Marion Tillmann <mt7357@gmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Marion Tillmann

tarraga 2

el morche malaga, AK 29793
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

John Dodge to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: John Dodge <trosszone@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to John Dodge <trosszone@yahoo.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal. We need to preserve our national

park's habitat, view included!

Sincerely,

John Dodge

PO Box 2532

Homer, AK 99603-2532

(907) 299-3677
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Steven Bergt to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:14 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Steven Bergt <sbergt@gci.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Steven Bergt <sbergt@gci.net>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Steven Bergt

2600 Draper Dr

Anchorage, AK 99517-1239

(907) 727-0767
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Peter Appleton to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:16 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Peter Appleton <ocupdh@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Peter Appleton <ocupdh@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Peter Appleton

29 Helen

Dundas, AK 11287
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

W. Chris Jones to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:16 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: "W. Chris Jones" <wcjones@mtaonline.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to "W. Chris Jones" <wcjones@mtaonline.net>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

W. Chris Jones

PO Box 1237

Palmer, AK 99645-1237

(907) 745-4624
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Brian Macmillan to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:16 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Brian Macmillan <bmac_ak@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Brian Macmillan <bmac_ak@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

We will be shooting ourselves in the foot if we trade tourist dollars

for cheaper electricity. Either upgrade the Healy Coal Plant or keep it

off line. Don't pollute the goose that lays the Golden Eggs.

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Brian Macmillan

716 O St Apt 8

Anchorage, AK 99501-3259

(907) 980-8886
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Sean Egan to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:16 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Sean Egan <sdegan@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Sean Egan <sdegan@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Sean Egan

PO Box 750349

Fairbanks, AK 99775-0349
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Cassia Stewart to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:16 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Cassia Stewart <cassiareft@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Cassia Stewart <cassiareft@yahoo.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Cassia Stewart

1545 Hoyt St Spc 85

Anchorage, AK 99508-3185
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Art Kolter to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:16 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Art Kolter <alkolter@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Art Kolter <alkolter@gmail.com>

Mar 23, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Art Kolter

PO Box 20414

Juneau, AK 99802-0414
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Victoria McDonald to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:17 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Victoria McDonald <victoriamcdonald48@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Victoria McDonald <victoriamcdonald48@gmail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Coal is a well-known pollutant. Please stop burning it and use

renewable energy. Alaska deserves the best!

Sincerely,

Victoria McDonald

6526 Rogers Pass Rd

Ketchikan, AK 99901-9745

(907) 254-0914
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Philip Richey to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:18 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Philip Richey <wulfeneq@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Philip Richey <wulfeneq@yahoo.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Philip Richey

7700 Chaimi Loop

Anchorage, AK 99504-4699
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Alice Ciostek to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:44 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Alice Ciostek <alice@computermail.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Alice Ciostek <alice@computermail.net>

Mar 25, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

We Alaskan residents and our gests must be protected from toxic

emissions by

coal mining and coal burning in a heart of pristine environment, called

Denali National Park. It should be a priority for GVEA's

"Healy" to eliminate harmfull

emitions by using new technologies.

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Alice Ciostek

13601 E Norman Ave

Palmer, AK 99645-9469

(907) 745-7766

RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Roland Göttert to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:46 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Roland Göttert <roand.goettert@googlemail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Roland Göttert <roand.goettert@googlemail.com>

Mar 24, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Roland Göttert

Katzenloch

Kempfeld, MN 55758
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Judy Brakel to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 12:20 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Judy Brakel <judybrakel@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Judy Brakel <judybrakel@gmail.com>

Mar 25, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I live in Alaska and I care deeply about protecting public health, air

quality at national parks and wilderness areas, and local economies

supported by recreation and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Judy Brakel

PO Box 94

Gustavus, AK 99826-0094

(907) 697-2287
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Lilli Ohse to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 01:16 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Lilli Ohse <lilliohse@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Lilli Ohse <lilliohse@yahoo.com>

Mar 25, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Ms. Lilli Ohse

PO Box 186

Seldovia, AK 99663-0186
Don't Exempt Alaska Park-Polluters from Emission Controls (Docket ID No. 

EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367)

Rebecca Redwine to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 04:15 PM

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association 

<takeaction@npca.org>

From: Rebecca Redwine <auntbot@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: National Parks Conservation Association <takeaction@npca.org>

Please respond to Rebecca Redwine <auntbot@hotmail.com>

Mar 25, 2012

Administrator Dennis McLerran

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Administrator McLerran,

I urge you to strengthen Alaska's regional haze plan. Clean and clear

air in Denali National Park and Preserve is important to me.

Unfortunately, one industrial facility, Healy Units 1 and 2, is less

than five miles from Denali, and is not being required to clean up

enough to significantly decrease its impact on the park. Please improve

your proposal and require greater pollution reductions from these park

polluters.

As a national park visitor and advocate for the parks, I value Denali's

pristine air and breathtaking views. Unfortunately, EPA has approved an

Alaska haze plan that will not adequately protect the places that I

care deeply about. For Healy Unit 1, an older power plant, modern

controls should be required to stem the haze pollution that currently

threatens Denali's majestic lands. For Healy Unit 2, a newer facility,

no pollution controls were proposed. This plan would allow the Healy

Unit 2 to operate for five years or more, next door to Denali, without

being evaluated for modern, haze-limiting controls. I ask that EPA

require modern and effective pollution controls to mitigate haze before

this facility restarts operations.

Reduced views and compromised air quality are problems that Congress

sought to fix by setting aside these lands for special air quality

protection. And we need to fix these problems.

The EPA cannot let Alaska power plants escape pollution controls;

please require an adequate Alaska haze plan that would ensure clean air

in Denali, and throughout the region for present and future

generations.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
Mrs. Rebecca Redwine

PO Box 206

Haines, AK 99827-0206
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Deirdre Holzweiler to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 04:20 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Deirdre Holzweiler <deirdree06@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Deirdre Holzweiler <deirdree06@gmail.com>

Mar 25, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

This is shocking that haze is limiting the view of denali. I never

expect haze and air ollution here of all places!!

Please stop this and make the air clean again.We shouldnt have this

problem in pristine Alaska!!!

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Deirdre Holzweiler

5100 Fairchild Ave

Fairbanks, AK 99709-4523

(907) 479-4796
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Maureen Carey to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 05:19 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Maureen Carey <trsrugi@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Maureen Carey <trsrugi@gmail.com>

Mar 25, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

YES! YES! I have been working towards such a future here in Alaska.

Thank you for being strong and steadfast for the pristine beauty and

integrity of life for all those living in Alaska as well as the

tourists who provide another source of income for Alaska besides fossil

fuel businesses. Namaste, Maureen

Sincerely,

Maureen Carey

PO Box 102

Hoonah, AK 99829-0102

(907) 988-4008

RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Meg Simm to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 05:49 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Meg Simm <miss.m.simm@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Meg Simm <miss.m.simm@gmail.com>

Mar 25, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Meg Simm

18 Gillespie Ave.

Toronto, AK 99517
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Nina Gondos to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:19 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Nina Gondos <ninaninettev@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Nina Gondos <ninaninettev@hotmail.com>

Mar 25, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Nina Gondos

27 Woodlands Grove

Frankston, AK 99502
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Josanne Breeding-Owen to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 06:38 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Josanne Breeding-Owen <71josie@earthlink.net>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Josanne Breeding-Owen <71josie@earthlink.net>

Mar 25, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Josanne Breeding-Owen

7141 Montagne Cir

Anchorage, AK 99507-1283
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Jill Burkert to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 07:21 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Jill Burkert <jillburkert@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Jill Burkert <jillburkert@yahoo.com>

Mar 25, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

I think we have to decide whether we want to live in a wasteland or to

preserve the wilderness that remains. Time to wake up.

Sincerely,

Jill Burkert

PO Box 33403

Juneau, AK 99803-3403
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Camden Yehle to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 09:50 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Camden Yehle <camdenyehle@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Camden Yehle <camdenyehle@gmail.com>

Mar 25, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Camden Yehle

7283 Meadows Loop

Anchorage, AK 99507
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Angelina Wellborn to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 10:51 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Angelina Wellborn <arcticangel19@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Angelina Wellborn <arcticangel19@gmail.com>

Mar 26, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Angelina Wellborn

16308 Copper Mountain Cir

Eagle River, AK 99577-7705
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Linda Middaugh to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:20 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Linda Middaugh <treehugger35@msn.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Linda Middaugh <treehugger35@msn.com>

Mar 26, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Linda Middaugh

8101 Rovenna St

Anchorage, AK 99518-2473

(520) 717-4944
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Dana Durham to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:50 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Dana Durham <dizzydunkin@hotmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Dana Durham <dizzydunkin@hotmail.com>

Mar 26, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Dana Durham

PO Box 1016

Girdwood, AK 99587-1016

(907) 783-1187
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

James Doeppers to: R10-Public Comments 03/25/2012 11:50 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: James Doeppers <jimdoeppers@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to James Doeppers <jimdoeppers@gmail.com>

Mar 26, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

James Doeppers

259 Richardson Dr

Mill Valley, CA 94941-2518
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Dorothea Ott to: R10-Public Comments 03/26/2012 02:50 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Dorothea Ott <dhtribleott@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Dorothea Ott <dhtribleott@gmail.com>

Mar 26, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Dorothea Ott

4795 Princeton Dr

Fairbanks, AK 99709-3216

(907) 328-9069
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Bonnie Bromley to: R10-Public Comments 03/26/2012 11:23 AM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Bonnie Bromley <comatosetomatoes@yahoo.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Bonnie Bromley <comatosetomatoes@yahoo.com>

Mar 26, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Bonnie Bromley

822 Warren St Uppr

Ketchikan, AK 99901-6139

(907) 225-6977
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Andrew Tomasuolo to: R10-Public Comments 03/26/2012 12:52 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Andrew Tomasuolo <nyhoser39@aol.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Andrew Tomasuolo <nyhoser39@aol.com>

Mar 26, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Andrew Tomasuolo

558 Clawson St

Staten Island, NY 10306-4239
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Judy Jessee to: R10-Public Comments 03/26/2012 03:22 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Judy Jessee <judy@meyeres.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Judy Jessee <judy@meyeres.com>

Mar 26, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Judy Jessee

1591 Opry Way

Fairbanks, AK 99709-5641

(907) 452-2378
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Tina Brown to: R10-Public Comments 03/26/2012 04:51 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Tina Brown <zerobridgewon@aol.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Tina Brown <zerobridgewon@aol.com>

Mar 26, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Tina Brown

19400 Beardsley Way

Juneau, AK 99801-8218

(907) 523-5402
RE: EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0367

Lynn Savonen to: R10-Public Comments 03/26/2012 05:53 PM

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

From: Lynn Savonen <savonen@infinityusers.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA

Sent by: Sierra Club <information@sierraclub.org>

Please respond to Lynn Savonen <savonen@infinityusers.com>

Mar 26, 2012

Dennis McLerran

Dear McLerran,

I care deeply about protecting public health, air quality at national

parks and wilderness areas, and local economies supported by recreation

and tourism.

Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy Unit No. 1 plant

("Healy") is a coal-fired boiler that was constructed over

forty years ago. Its emissions cause substantial visibility impairment

in Denali National Park, and around the region. Denali is one of the

nation's most magnificent national parks. Denali is a popular tourist

destination that encompasses more than six million acres of open tundra

gleaning with wildflowers, spruce trees, and valleys with glacier-fed

rivers and lakes.

Because Healy contributes to visibility impairment in Denali, it is

subject to "Best Available Retrofit Technology" (BART) limits

under EPA's Regional Haze Rule. .

EPA should impose lower BART emissions limits for sulfur dioxide and

nitrogen oxides at Healy that are consistent with modern pollution

control technology to protect public health, the environment and Denali

National Park. In the long term, Alaska's energy future is best founded

on clean, efficient energy not coal.

Sincerely,

Lynn Savonen

Mountainview Hwy

Gustavus, AK 99826

(208) 651-2527