alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# McElmo Creek Unit Main Flare

CLEAN AIR ACT PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION PERMIT AMENDMENT U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 November 20, 2014

# What is EPA’s Action ?

• EPA is amending the Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant

Deterioration (PSD) permit for the MCU Facility to:

 Add pollution limits and other terms and conditions as required by a federal Consent Decree (United States v. Mobil Exploration and Producing U.S. Inc.) for the existing Main Flare at the site

.  Remove and update other permit requirements due to equipment that has been shut down and removed from the site.



### •Other than the replacement of a fixed speed fan with a variable speed

fan to provide better pollution control at the Main Flare, this permit action does not authorize any new construction or modification of existing equipment at the site.

# What is the Main Flare?

• The Main Flare is an existing device used to burn waste gases from various sources at the McElmo Creek Unit oilfield

.

• The McElmo Creek Unit oilfield is primarily involved in crude petroleum oil production, and is one of four oilfield units in the greater Aneth oilfield on the Navajo Nation Reservation in southeastern Utah.

• The McElmo Creek Unit oilfield operation includes field operations and a gas compression plant.  Field Operations

- About 90 producing wells where petroleum crude oil is recovered.  Gas Compression Plant

- Used to support recovery of crude oil in the McElmo Creek Unit oilfield; Main Flare is physically located here.

# What is BACT for the Main Flare?

The pollution limits and other terms and conditions that will be added into the permit include the following Best Available Control Technology (BACT) limitations and conditions to minimize flaring.  Emissions from the Main Flare must not exceed 60 tons per year (tpy ) sulfur dioxide, 13.4 tpy nitrogen oxides, 73 tpy carbon monoxide, and 95.4 tpy volatile organic compounds  Operate the Main Flare using air

-assist technology  Ensure that the net heating value for dilution is greater than or equal to 24.4 BTU/ft 2  Operate and maintain Main Flare in accordance with the federal flare standards in 40 CFR § 60.18  Follow other operations and maintenance, root cause, and corrective action requirements

# What are the air quality impacts?

•The proposed amendments to the

PSD permit:

 Will not cause or contribute to a violation of EPA’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards; and  Are not expected to adversely impact the air quality of any designated federal Class I areas (i.e., national parks and wilderness areas) within 200 km of the site.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Steven A. Manz, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hercules Offshore, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:
December 9, 2005



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Steven A. Manz     
|    |  | Steven A. Manz         
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14**

**PROMULGATED UNDER**

**SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Michael Angerthal, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CBRE Realty Finance, Inc.; 

2. Based onmy knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986, Section III E.] 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 15, 2007
```

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paramount Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I J. Jay Lobell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

By:  /s/ J. Jay Lobell                                       Dated: May 15, 2006
     -----------------------------
     J. Jay Lobell
     Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
     (Principal Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer)
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Frezer, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin R. Keating,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Kevin R. KeatingKevin
                R. Keating
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              August
                8, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of NewPage Holding Corporation and NewPage Corporation (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Richard D. Willett, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of
the Companies.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Richard D. Willett, Jr.
|Richard D. Willett, Jr.    
|Chief Executive Officer    
|November 10, 2009
exv10w31



 





Exhibit 10.31




ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT

2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN



The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of ABM Industries Incorporated has approved a
grant to you (the “Grantee”) of shares of Restricted Stock (“Restricted Shares”) of ABM Industries
Incorporated pursuant to the ABM Industries Incorporated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”),
as described below.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Grantee Name:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Number of Shares Granted:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Date of Grant:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Vesting Schedule:	 	50% on the second anniversary of the Grant Date;

remaining shares on the fourth anniversary of the Grant Date





Provided you continue to provide services to the Company or any Affiliate of the Company
through the applicable vesting date, the Restricted Shares will vest as provided above.
Unvested Restricted Shares may be subject to forfeiture if you terminate employment before the
vesting date, as set forth in the Plan and the Statement of Terms and Conditions attached hereto.



Additional Terms:  ̈ If this box is checked, the additional terms and conditions set
forth on Attachment 1 hereto are applicable and are incorporated herein by reference. (No
document need be attached as Attachment 1).



The Plan and the Statement of Terms and Conditions are incorporated herein by reference.
Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan or in the
Statement of Terms and Conditions, as applicable.



By their signatures below, the Company and the Grantee agree that the Restricted Shares are granted
under and governed by this Restricted Share Agreement and by the provisions of the Plan and the
Statement of Terms and Conditions attached hereto.



The Grantee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, the Statement of Terms and Conditions and
the Plan Prospectus, represents that the Grantee has carefully read and is familiar with their
provisions, and hereby accepts the Restricted Shares subject to all of their terms and conditions.
The Grantee acknowledges that there may be adverse tax consequences upon vesting or disposition of
the Restricted Shares and that Grantee should consult a tax adviser prior to such vesting or
disposition.



Please sign your name in the space provided below on this Restricted Stock Agreement and return an
executed copy to Sandra Briggs, ABM Industries Incorporated, 160 Pacific Ave., Ste. 222, San
Francisco, CA 94111.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED	 	GRANTEE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Henrik C. Slipsager	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	President & Chief Executive Officer	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	 	 	 	 	Date:	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 





ATTACHMENTS:




2006 Equity Incentive Plan

Statement of Terms and Conditions

Prospectus
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 JANUARY 21, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-13014

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-81041-CV-DMM

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMIE L. SOLOW,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(January 21, 2009)

Before HULL, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, we conclude that the Defendant, Jamie L.

Solow, has not shown reversible error in (1) the district court’s order, dated March
26, 2008, denying Solow’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, or in the

alternative for a new trial, (2) the district court’s order, dated September 10, 2007,

granting the Securities Exchange Commission’s motion for leave to file a second

amended complaint, (3) the district court’s order, dated May 10, 2007, denying

Solow’s motion to dismiss, (4) the district court’s order, dated January 22, 2008,

denying Solow’s motions in limine, (5) the jury’s finding as enumerated on the

general verdict form dated January 31, 2008, and (6) the district court’s entry of

final judgment, dated May 14, 2008, in favor of the SEC.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Robert P. Grim, Jane C. Grim, Shannon :

M. Crowe, Alexander G. Crowe, :

Stephen J. Demchyk, Barbara K. :

Demchyk, John C. Zima, Darrell L. :

Browning, Diane Dudley, Kenneth P. :

Franke, Anne H. Franke, Dean Haas, :

Helen A. Wanamaker, Dwight S. :

Wanamaker, and Laurel L. Burkhardt, :

Appellants :

:

v. :

:

Maxatawny Township Board of :

Supervisors, Duke Realty Limited :

Partnership, Charles E. Wessner, :

Carol J. Wessner, Cynthia K. Schlegel, :

Pollyanna G. Hartman, Kathy Karpeuk, :

Robert M. Skrip, Linda Skrip, Roy :

Wessner, Dale Wessner, Jenni Reinhard, : No. 1452 C.D. 2021

and Jeremy Reinhard :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2023, the Application for Reargument 

En Banc by Appellee Duke Realty Limited Partnership Pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 2541-

2546 (Application) is GRANTED IN PART. This Court’s Opinion filed April 6, 

2023 is amended to delete footnote 12 on page 11. The Opinion is withdrawn and 

the attached amended Opinion is entered. The Court’s April 6, 2023 Order is not 

affected by the amendment to the Opinion. 

The Application is otherwise DENIED.

__________________________________

CHRISTINE FIZZANO CANNON, Judge
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         | China      YouTV Corp. |                                         |
|------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                         |                   |                                         |   |
| Date:      November 13, 2008 | By:                    | /s/ Jie Wang                            |   |
|                         |                   | Name:      Jie Wang                          |   |
|                         |                   | Title: Principal      Financial Officer |   |
|                         |                   |                                         |   |
<PAGE>

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
RomTech, Inc.

         We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (No.'s 333-23709 and 333-26305) on Form S-3 of RomTech, Inc. of our
report dated September 17, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of
RomTech, Inc. and subsidiary as of June 30, 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the two-year period ended June 30, 1997, which report appears in the
June 30, 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of RomTech, Inc.



                                                    /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

                                                    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
                                                    September 24, 1997
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*DESI ARNEZ MORTON

*Donald D. Dakers,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Paul Ferencek,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 28, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 903 (AC 16391), is denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.06 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, DSCR, DLA Installation SUpport at Richmond, RAB

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report of FCB Bancorp (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report).

I, C. G. Kum, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 14, 2006



By:

/s/ C. G. KumC.G. KumPresident and Chief Executive Officer