alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.4


[Cantel Medical
Corp. Letterhead]


December 18, 2006


 


TO:  SETH R. SEGEL


 


Dear Seth:


This letter confirms that
the term of your Employment Agreement dated November 1, 2004 has been extended
for a one year period ending October 31, 2008.


Please acknowledge and
confirm your agreement to the extension by signing and returning a copy of this
letter to Joanna Albrecht.


 


	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ James P. Reilly

  
	
  President and CEO

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  ACKNOWLEDGED and CONFIRMED:

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ Seth R. Segel

  	
   

  
	
  Seth R. Segel
**Docket Number: FA A**  **- 2013**  **- 0209**  **Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?**
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.      SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: | November                14, 2007 |   | By: |  /s/              H. Kerr Taylor |
|-------|----------------------------------|--------|-----|---------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Susan J. Allread, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Greenville FederalFinancial Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issueras of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date: November  6, 2007 /s/Susan J. Allread   Susan J. Allread   Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
31.1




AULTRA
GOLD INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302




I, Rauno
Perttu, Chief Executive Officer of Aultra Gold Inc., certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2008, of Aultra Gold Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4. The
issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the issuer including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; and




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's
internal control over financial reporting;




5. The
issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls over financial
reporting.




Date: August
      14, 2008
                By:
                /s/ Rauno
      PerttuRauno
      PerttuPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION F OR R EHEARING EN B ANC

Cause number: 01

- 18

- 0 0390

- C R

Style: David Allyn Sweat v. The State of Texas

Type of motion: Motion for rehearing

Part y filing motion: Appell ant

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for rehearing en banc is denied

.

Judge’s signature:

____ /s/ Julie C ountiss

____

En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly,

Goodman, Landau, Hightower, Countiss, and Adams.

Date: December 29, 2020
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-51225

consolidated with

No. 21-51233

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

ERNESTO VILLALOBOS-MARQUEZ, 

Defendant—Appellant,

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-497-4

USDC No. 4:21-CR-707-1

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Ernesto Villalobos-Marquez appeals his conviction and sentence 

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2), along with the district court’s order 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 31, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-51225 Document: 00516262138 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2022
No. 21-51225

c/w No. 21-51233

2

revoking the term of supervised release he was serving at the time of the 

offense. Because his appellate brief does not address the validity of the 

revocation or the revocation sentence, he abandons any challenge to that 

order. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

Villalobos-Marquez contends that it violates the Constitution to treat 

a prior conviction that increases the statutory maximum under § 1326(b)(2) 

as a sentencing factor, rather than an element of the offense. He correctly 

concedes that the argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United 

States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he wishes to preserve it for further review. 

Villalobos-Marquez has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

affirmance. Because Villalobos-Marquez’s position “is clearly right as a 

matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to the outcome 

of the case,” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 

1969), summary affirmance is proper.

Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and 

the judgment of conviction and order of revocation are AFFIRMED. 

Case: 21-51225 Document: 00516262138 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/31/2022
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Jaguar Acquisition Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the “Report”), as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
      Jonathan Kalman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
                /s/ Jonathan Kalman
            
            
            Dated:
              November
              __, 2007Jonathan
              KalmanChief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
Exhibit 4.9  New Dutch Originator Accession Agreement  To:          Security Agent  From:      Buhrmann Office Products Nederland B.V.  Master Definitions and
Framework Deed (dated 27 September 2000 as amended and restated on 28 September
2001, 18 July 2002 and 16 April 2003)(the  Master Definitions and Framework
Deed)  This
Agreement shall have expressly and specifically incorporated into it the
provisions set out in the Master Definitions and Framework Deed (hereafter
referred to as the Provisions),
as though the same were set out in full in this Agreement mutatis mutandis and subject to English
law.  In the event of any conflict
between the provisions of this Agreement and the Provisions, this Agreement
shall prevail.  We
refer to Clause 4 of the Master Definitions and Framework Deed.  With
effect from the date specified below, Buhrmann Office Products Nederland, B.V.
incorporated in The Netherlands with registered number 33272529, hereby agrees
to become an Additional Dutch Originator and to be bound by the terms of:  1.the Master Definitions and Framework Deed;  2.the Servicing Agreement dated 27 September 2000, as amended and
restated on 28 September 2001 and 18 July 2002;  3.the Deed of Amendment (English Law Governed Transaction Documents)
dated 18 July 2002; and  4.the Dutch Master Receivables Purchase Agreement dated 27 September
2000 as amended and restated on 18 July 2002,  subject
to and in accordance with Clause 4 of the Master Definitions and Framework
Deed.  The
following is the address for notices to the proposed Additional Dutch
Originator:
Buhrmann Office Products Nederland B.V.
Atoomweg, 103, 3542 AA Utrecht
PO Box 8129, 3503 RC Utrecht
The Netherlands
Attention:  Jouke van der Veer, Finance
Director
Fax:  +31 30 248 41 04  
   Copy
to:
Buhrmann N.V.
Hoogoorddreef 62
1101EE Amsterdam Zuidoost
The Netherlands
Attention:  Marcel Graven and Raf
Monnens  This
Agreement is governed by English law.  By:Authorised
  Signatory of Buhrmann Office Products Nederland B.V.  Date:       16 April 2003
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement  on  Forms  S-8  (Nos.  333-04479,  333-05923,  333-42111,  333-71025,
333-88451,  333-52162 and 333-52166) and Forms S-3 (Nos.  333-14549,  333-23193,
333-39787,  333-49825, 333-65397, 333-66287, 333-69737, 333-72357 and 333-84017)
of Talk.com Inc. and its  Subsidiaries  of our reports  dated  February 27, 2001
relating to the financial  statements and financial statement  schedules,  which
appear in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 30, 2001
Exhibit
4.8  New US Originator Accession Agreement  To:Security Agent  From:A.S.A.P. Software Express, Inc.  Master
Definitions and Framework Deed (dated 27 September 2000 as amended and
restated on 28 September 2001, 18 July 2002 and
16 April 2003)(the  Master Definitions and Framework
Deed)  We refer to Clause 4 of the Master
Definitions and Framework Deed.  This Agreement shall have expressly and
specifically incorporated into it the provisions set out in the Master
Definitions and Framework deed (hereafter referred to as the Provisions), as
though the same were set out in full in this Agreement mutatis mutandis and subject to English
law.  In the event of any conflict
between the provisions of this Agreement and the Provisions, this Agreement
shall prevail.  With effect from the date specified below,
A.S.A.P. Software Express, Inc. incorporated in the United States with
registered number 5358-166-8 hereby agrees to become an Additional US
Originator and to be bound by the terms of:  1.the Master Definitions and Framework Deed;  2.the Servicing Agreement dated 27 September 2000, as amended and
restated on 28 September 2001 and 18 July 2002;  3.the Deed of Amendment (English Law Governed Transaction Documents)
dated 18 July 2002;  4.the US Contribution Agreement dated as of 28 September 2001 as
amended and restated on 18 July 2002;  5.the amended and restated limited liability company agreement (the
LLC Agreement) dated as of 18 July 2002;  6.the US Collection Account Agreement dated as of 28 September 2001
as amended and restated on 18 July 2002; and  7.the Lock Box and Assigned Account Agreement Letter of Amendment
dated 18 July 2002,  subject
to and in accordance with Clause 4 of the Master Definitions and Framework
Deed.  The following is the address for notices of
the proposed Additional US Originator:  
   A.S.A.P. Software Express, Inc.
C/o CT Corp System
208 So. LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60604  Copy:  A.S.A.P. Software Express, Inc.
850 Ashbury Drive
Buffalo Grove, IL 60089
Attention:  Kim Stuart, VP Finance
Facsimile:  +1 847 465 3277  A.S.A.P. Software Express, Inc.Bodemstraat 11
bus1, 3830 Wellen, Belgium
Attn:  Raf Monnen
Facsimile:  +32 11 37 6044  A.S.A.P.
Software Express, Inc.Hoogoorddreef 62
1101 BE Amsterdam ZO Attn:  Marcel
Graven
Facsimile:  +31 20 651 10 17  This Agreement is governed by English law.  By:Authorised Signatory of A.S.A.P. Software
  Express, Inc.  Date:16 April 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6218

BENNIE A. MACK, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR., in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Federal District Court Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina; KAREN L. NENSTEIL, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as a former agent for the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation; ROBERT M. HAMILTON, in his individual and in his official capacity as an Assistant United States Attorney; JOSEPH M. WILSON, JR., in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as a practicing attorney and partner in the Law Firm of “Merr itt Flebotte Wilson Webb & Carusso PLLC; PAUL TREVOR SHARP, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as a Federal Magistrate Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina; JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as a Federal Magistrate Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as United States Attorney General; ANNA MILLS WAGONER, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina; FRANK J. CHUT, JR., in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Assistant United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina; ROBIN PENDERGRAFT, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as
Director of the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation; NC ATTORNEY GENERAL ROY COOPER, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as North Carolina Attorney General; KEVIN SNEAD, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as an agent for the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation,

Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00776-NCT-RAE)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 5, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bennie A. Mack, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, Gill Paul Beck, Sr., Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM:

Bennie A. Mack, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that

this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

for the reasons stated by the district court. Mack v. Osteen

,

No. 1:08-cv-00776-NCT-RAE (M.D.N.C. Jan. 30, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|**Exhibit
99.9**
|----------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Tembec Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the year ended September 30, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James M. Lopez, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|1. |  | the Report fully complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | the information contained
      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   |  |                                                                                                                                                                

Date: December 21, 2006

*(s) James M. Lopez*James M.
LopezPresident and Chief Executive
Officer

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0459

IN THE MATTER OF:

K.G.,

A Youth in Need of Care.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Kendra A. 

Steppler is granted an extension of time to and including December 14,

2021, within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested 

on appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 21 2021

10/21/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0459
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-18-00026-CV

KELLY THOMAS APPELLANT

V.

CARL PUGLIESE; SETH JOHNS, 

CMO OF CARL’S HANDYMAN; 

AND CULPEPPER PLUMBING & 

AIR CONDITIONING, INC.

APPELLEES 

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. CV-2016-01764

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

This is the fourth appeal brought by appellant Kelly Thomas arising from 

her pending lawsuit against appellees Carl Pugliese, Seth Johns, and Culpepper 

Plumbing & Air Conditioning, Inc. As we have with her three prior appeals, we 

dismiss this appeal.

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

In 2016, Thomas filed suit against the appellees, alleging that they had 

performed defective plumbing services at her home. See Thomas v. Pugliese, 

No. 02-17-00423-CV, 2018 WL 547596, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 25, 

2018, no pet. h.) (mem. op.) (discussing Thomas’s prior appeals against the 

appellees). On November 28, 2017, the trial court granted the appellees’ motion 

for sanctions against Thomas and warned that it would dismiss her claims “[i]f 

any [sanctions] payments are not delivered, either timely or in full” to the 

appellees. To date, the trial court has not dismissed Plaintiff’s claims. Thomas 

attempts to appeal this order for the second time. As we noted in our prior 

dismissal of Thomas’s first attempt to appeal this order, it is not a final or 

otherwise appealable order. See id. at *1–2.

We notified Thomas of our jurisdictional concerns. See Tex. R. App. P. 

44.3. And although Thomas responded, she did not establish our jurisdiction 

over her attempted appeal.2 We dismiss Thomas’s appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.3 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, KERR, and PITTMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 8, 2018

 

2She asserted that her claims had been dismissed in the sanctions order; 

however, they were not. 

3Because we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal, we dismiss 

Thomas’s motion to transfer as moot.