alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsCommentaries     Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians
        
            Commentaries
 Keyword
 Type Select a CategoryTop StoriesMission/TrainingFeaturesSecretary of the AFAF Chief of StaffChief Master Sgt. of the AFCommentariesSequestration NewsSpace/TechnologyHumanitarianAFSO 21Women's History Month 1-15EnvironmentalWarrior CareDiversityDignified TransferSafetyHeritageAir Force FamilyPersonnel MattersCommander's Call TopicsHaiti Earthquake ReliefDon't Ask Don't TellSuicide PreventionWarrior GamesEnergyAircraftEtchbergerSexual AssaultOperation TomodachiOperation Odyssey Dawn2011 Appropriations InformationHurricane Irene9/11AFAWeek in PhotosThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their Words2012 Appropriations InformationAfrican American History MonthAfrican American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29Fiscal Year BudgetAir Force StoriesColorado WildfireChief of Staff ArchiveHurricane IsaacAFA 2012APP RSSAPP Airman VisualsExpeditionary OperationsHurricane SandyTransition GPSAir Force in SpaceSports/RecreationH1N1Women's History Month 16-30Oklahoma Tornado ReliefMemorial DayCOVID-19 CommentariesCOVID-19
 RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 April 21, 2016Introspection
        We were all created different. We think differently, perceive things differently and interpret success and failure through very different lenses. At each person’s unique period in life, they begin to look back, wondering if they truly made a difference.  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# L_2006212EN.01001501.xml

| 2.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 212/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 212/15

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 24 July 2006

appointing a Deputy Director of Europol

(2006/531/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention) (1), and in particular Article 29(2) thereof,

Acting as the authority vested with the power to appoint Deputy Directors of Europol,

Having regard to the opinion of the Management Board,

Whereas:

| (1) | Due to the resignation of a Deputy Director of Europol, it is necessary to appoint a Deputy Director. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Due to the resignation of a Deputy Director of Europol, it is necessary to appoint a Deputy Director.

| (2) | The Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees (2), and in particular their Appendix 8, establish special provisions on the procedure for the selection of the Director or a Deputy Director of Europol. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees (2), and in particular their Appendix 8, establish special provisions on the procedure for the selection of the Director or a Deputy Director of Europol.

| (3) | The Management Board presented the Council with a short-list of suitable applicants for appointment, together with the full file of each of those applicants, as well as the full list of the applicants. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Board presented the Council with a short-list of suitable applicants for appointment, together with the full file of each of those applicants, as well as the full list of the applicants.

| (4) | On the basis of all relevant information provided by the Management Board, the Council wishes to appoint the applicant who, according to the Council, meets all the requirements of the vacant position of Deputy Director, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

On the basis of all relevant information provided by the Management Board, the Council wishes to appoint the applicant who, according to the Council, meets all the requirements of the vacant position of Deputy Director,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Michel QUILLÉ is hereby appointed as Deputy Director of Europol from 1 September 2006 to 31 August 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 July 2006.

For the Council

The President

K. RAJAMÄKI

---

(1)  
  OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 2.

1

(2)  See Council Act of 3 December 1998 laying down the staff regulations applicable to Europol employees (OJ C 26, 30.1.1999, p. 23) as amended by Council Act of 19 December 2002 (OJ C 24, 31.1.2003, p. 1).

2

---
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 93RD DISTRICT COURT of HIDALGO COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 25th day of May,

2017, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Everett James Morris, Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-16-00323-CR (Tr.Ct.No. CR-4102-13-B)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal,

concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court orders

the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 9th day of August, 2017.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.01 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, Fort Lee Band, Veterans day

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
MEMORANDUM 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 4 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

November 7, 2014 

SUBJECT: MOVES Modeling Files for Federal Register Document EPA-R04-0AR-2014-

0267; Approval of Implementation Plans and Designation of Areas; Georgia; 

Redesignation of the Georgia Portion of the Chattanooga, 1997 PM2.s 

Nonattainment Area to Attainment 

FROM: Joydeb Majumder -j'\ 

Regulatory Development Section 

TO: File and Docket EPA-R04-0AR-2014-0267 

Due to the MOVES modeling file type, the Region was unable to upload the MOVES files from 

Georgia's submittal to the Federal Docket Management System. An electronic copy can be 

viewed at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that, if at all possible, you schedule your 

inspection. Please contact Joydeb Majumder, listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 

CONTACT section, of the Federal Register notice for an appointment. The Regional Office's 

official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays. 

Internet Address (URLl • http:/fwww.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-30330

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Willie James Cook, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:21-CV-1010

USDC No. 3:19-CR-174-1

Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Willie James Cook, federal prisoner # 21194-035, seeks a certificate of 

appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255 motion challenging his sentence for possessing a firearm as a felon in 

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). In his § 2255 motion, Cook contended that 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 28, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-30330 Document: 00516256338 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2022
No. 21-30330

2

he received ineffective assistance when his counsel failed to advocate for a 

reduced sentence based on time that he served in state custody for an offense 

related to his § 922(g) offense. The district court dismissed the § 2255 

motion as untimely and, alternatively, on the merits. Cook also appeals the 

district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his motion to modify his 

sentence, which is construed as arising under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

BecauseCook fails to challenge the district court’s denial of his § 2255 

motion as time barred, he has abandoned the issue. See Hughes v. Johnson, 

191 F.3d 607, 613 (5th Cir. 1999). Cook has thus not “made a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right,” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), or 

shown “that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district 

court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000). It is unnecessary to address the merits of his claims. See Houser 

v. Dretke, 395 F.3d 560, 561-62 (5th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, a COA is 

DENIED.

The district court dismissed Cook’s § 2241 petition without prejudice 

for lack of jurisdiction because Cook failed to exhaust his administrative 

remedies. Cook does not argue that he exhausted administrative remedies; 

he instead argues that the exhaustion requirement is not jurisdictional. His 

argument is unavailing. See Pierce v. Holder, 614 F.3d 158, 160 (5th Cir. 2010). 

Even if Cook was correct in his assertion, because Cook was incarcerated in 

the federal prison in Beaumont, Texas when he filed his § 2241 petition in 

the Western District of Louisiana, the district court nevertheless lacked 

jurisdiction to entertain the petition. See United States v. Brown, 753 F.2d 

455, 456 (5th Cir. 1985). Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal of Cook’s 

§ 2241 petition without prejudice is AFFIRMED. Cook’s motion to 

proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED.

Case: 21-30330 Document: 00516256338 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/28/2022
S. 1774 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

For the relief of Hotaru Nakama Ferschke. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR HOTARU NAKAMA 

FERSCHKE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of 

section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Hotaru Nakama 

Ferschke shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or 

for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted 

for permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance 

of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

of status to lawful permanent resident. 

(b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Hotaru Nakama Ferschke 

enters the United States before the filing deadline specified in 

subsection (c), she shall be considered to have entered and remained 

lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment 

of status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance 

of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status 

is filed with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of 

the enactment of this Act. 

(d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—Upon the 

granting of an immigrant visa or permanent residence to Hotaru 

Nakama Ferschke, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 

officer to reduce by 1, during the current or next following fiscal 

year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 

of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 

of the country of the alien’s birth under section 202(e) of such 

Act. 

(e) PAYGO.—The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose 

of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go-Act of 2010, shall 

be determined by reference to the latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary 

Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing 

in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate Budget 
S. 1774—2 

Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior 

to the vote on passage. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5389]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


2002 Reopened--Previously Denied Determinations; Notice of 
Negative Determinations on Reconsideration Under the Trade Adjustment 
Assistance Extension Act of 2011 Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) (Act) the Department of Labor (Department) herein 
presents summaries of negative determinations on reconsideration 
regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance for 
workers by case (TA-W-) number regarding negative determinations issued 
during the period of February 13, 2011 through October 21, 2011. 
Notices of negative determinations were published in the Federal 
Register and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271). As required by the Trade Adjustment 
Assistance Extension Act of 2011 (TAAEA), all petitions that were 
denied during this time period were automatically reopened. The 
reconsideration investigation revealed that the following workers 
groups have not met the certification criteria under the provisions of 
TAAEA.
    After careful review of the additional facts obtained, the 
following negative determinations on reconsideration have been issued.

TA-W-80,160; Pension Systems Corp., Sherman Oaks, CA

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned negative determinations on 
reconsideration were issued on February 16 2012. These determinations 
are available on the Department's Web site at tradeact/taa/taa--
search--form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by 
calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll-free at 888-365-
6822.

     Dated February 21, 2012.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-5389 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF
			THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Aspen Diversified Fund LLC (the
"Fund") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2007 (the
"Report"), I, Jeremy L. Standrod, Managing Partners of Aspen Partners, Ltd.,
Managing Member of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   1. the forgoing Report on Form 10-Q full complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   2. the information contained in the Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Fund.


Dated:  November 14, 2007


/s/ Jeremy L. Standrod

Jeremy L. Standrod, Managing Partner
Aspen Partners, Ltd.
Managing Member of Aspen Diversified Fund LLC
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report ofRochdale Mining Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Paul Brock, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

Dated this 21stday of November, 2006.

PAUL BROCKPaul BrockChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
























---
Exhibit32.2

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Richard A.Wisot, the chief financial officer of Proliance International, Inc.(the ‘‘issuer’’), does hereby certify that thereport on Form 10-K accompanying this certification (the‘‘report’’) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in thereport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the issuer.

/s/ Richard A.Wisot                                        Richard A. Wisot Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(chief financial officer) Proliance International, Inc. Date:March 31, 2006

----
---

Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Birner Dental Management Services, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the Company), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:      March 27, 2009





By:    /s/ Frederic W.J. Birner

Name:

Frederic W.J. Birner

Title:

Chief Executive Officer





By:    /s/ Dennis N. Genty

Name:    Dennis N. Genty

Title:

Chief Financial Officer





---