alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Jaguar Acquisition Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the “Report”), as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James
      S. Cassano, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:/s/ James S. Cassano
            
            
            Dated:
                August 14,
                2006James
                S. CassanoChief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Accounting and Financial Officer)
regional haze SIP questions 

Hoffman, Barbara to : Anne McWilliams, Anne Arnold 06/29/201211 :22 AM 

Cc: "Martone, Charles H", "Underhill, Jeff" 

From: "Hoffman, Barbara" <Barbara .Hoffman@des.nh .gov> 

To: Anne McWilliams/R1/USEPA/US@EPA, Anne Arnold/R1/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: "Martone, Charles H" <CharIes.Markone@des.nh .gov>, "Underhill, Jeff" 

<Jeffrey .Underhill @des.nh.gov> 

History : This message has been forwarded. 

1 attachment 

response to EPA questions 6.29.12.doc 

Please see the attached for DES's responses to the questions about sample points at MK2 and 

whether ASOFA was considered for IVIK2 . Let Charlie or me know if you have any questions. 

Thanks . 

Barbara L. Hoffman 

SIP Planning Manager 

NH Dept. of Environmental Services, Air Resources Div . 

P.O. Box 95 

29 Hazen Drive 

Concord, NH 03302-0095 

Tel: (603)271-7874 

FAX: (603)271-1381 

-----Original Message-----

From : Underhill, Jeff 

Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 9 :44 AM 

To: 'Anne McWilliams' 

Cc: Anne Arnold; Hoffman, Barbara; Martone, Charles H 

Subject : RE: PM at Merrimack Station 

Thanks Anne! I forwarded your message to those who researched it . You will likely receive an 

answer from Barbara Hoffman or Charlie Martone . 

-Jeff 

P.S . I'll be forwarding a sample CALPUFF output file shortly. As stated before, we used the 

maximum modeled source to Class I area concentration, not some percentage of it . I think the 

wording of the description of the work in the SIP may not have been as clear as it could have been 

regarding this . 

-----Original Message----- 

From : Anne McWilliams [mailto :mcwilliams .anne@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 8 :53 AM 

To : Underhill, Jeff; Martone, Charles H 

Cc: Anne Arnold 

Subject : PM at Merrimack Station 
Good Morning, 

One of the comments we received on the proposed approval of the New Hampshire RH 

SIP questioned the TSP emission limit for MK2. In the proposal, NHDES combined the 

emission limits from MK1 and MK2. Is it technically feasible to sample the emission limit 

post ESPs from MK2 before the FGD? In other words, it is possible to separate the TSP 

emission limits sampling for MK1 and MK2? 

Anne 

Anne McWilliams 

Air Quality Planning 

EPA - New England 

Tel: 617 918-1697 

Fax: 617 918-0697 

""** New Mailing Address After December 14, 2009"**'` 

EPA Region 1 

Five Post Office Square - Suite 100 

Mail Code - OEP05-02 

Boston, MA 02109-3912
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Randall D. Stilley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hercules Offshore, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 7, 2006



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Randall D. Stilley               
|    |  | Randall D. Stilley                   
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
#### Catherine A. Madigan, Respondent, v Theodore Klumpp, Jr., Appellant.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated January 22, 1990, which granted the plaintiff wife’s motion to strike a proposed judgment and to dismiss the action and the defendant’s counterclaim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Trial of this matrimonial action, during which the husband evidently succeeded on his counterclaim for divorce, focused on the financial aspects of the parties’ relationship. In that regard, the husband successfully defended against the wife’s claim for the appreciated value of his separate property and successfully obtained substantial credits against proceeds of the sale to be had of joiñtly-held marital property. Although *594the Supreme Court in its lengthy decision after trial directed that a judgment be submitted on notice, no proposed judgment was forthcoming until 18 months later when the husband served a notice of settlement and submitted a proposed judgment. In response, the wife moved to strike the proposed judgment on the ground that the action was "deemed abandoned” pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.48 (b) on account of husband’s failure to submit a judgment within 60 days of issuance of the decision as required by 22 NYCRR 202.48 (a).

We conclude that it was incumbent upon the husband to show good cause for the delay in seeking a conclusion to the action by submitting a proposed judgment *(cf., Tuller v Tuller,*162 AD2d 801; *Seeman v Seeman,*154 AD2d 584; *see also, Hickson v Gardner,*134 AD2d 930). Although there were post-decision applications for reargument, upon which the husband achieved some success, submission of the proposed judgment by the husband, who made no demand that the wife prepare a judgment *(cf., Hickson v Gardner, supra),*was in any event untimely by almost a year. The husband’s only explanation for the delay was his belief that preparing the judgment was the wife’s obligation. Since this excuse does not constitute "good cause” (22 NYCRR 202.48 [b]; *see, Tuller v Tuller, supra; Seeman v Seeman, supra),*the order granting the wife’s motion was well within the parameters of the discretion afforded to the Supreme Court to grant or deny the requested relief *(see, Tuller v Tuller, supra),*and we decline to disturb it. Harwood, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: July 7, 2016 521292

________________________________ In the Matter of ZACHARY M. and Others, Alleged to be Neglected Children.
OTSEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ASHLEY N., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: June 3, 2016 Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ.

__________ Susan Patnode, Rural Law Center of New York, Castleton (Cynthia Feathers of counsel), for appellant. Steven E. Ratner, Otsego County Department of Social Services, Cooperstown, for respondent. Christine A. McCue, Central Bridge, attorney for the children.

__________ Lahtinen, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Otsego County (Burns, J.), entered May 21, 2015, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to adjudicate respondents' children to be neglected.-2- 521292

Respondent Ashley N. (hereinafter the mother) and respondent Russell M. are the parents of one child (born in 2010), and the mother has another child (born in 2013). Based on allegations of, among other things, drug abuse and domestic violence, petitioner brought a neglect petition. In July 2014, the parties made admissions and consented to an order (eventually entered in January 2015), which adjourned the matter in contemplation of dismissal subject to respondents' compliance with certain conditions for one year. Respondents failed to comply with all the conditions, resulting in a violation petition. At an ensuing appearance before Family Court, the mother stipulated on the record to restore the neglect petition. She consented to findings based on her prior admissions and entry of an order providing for petitioner's supervision for one year while the children remained with her. Family Court issued such an order in May 2015, and the mother now appeals. The mother contends that the facts which she had previously admitted were insufficient to establish neglect. However, the order was entered upon consent. "It is well settled that no appeal lies from an order entered upon a party's consent" (Matter of Connor CC. [Jennifer DD.], 99 AD3d 1127, 1127 [2012]; see Matter of Gabrielle S. [Reberick T.], 105 AD3d 1098-1099 [2013]). The mother "failed to move to vacate the order on the grounds that [she] now raises" (Matter of Connor S. [Joseph S.], 122 AD3d 1096, 1097 [2014]; see Matter of Landon U. [Amanda U.], 132 AD3d 1081, 1086 n 1 [2015]; Matter of Cheyenne QQ., 37 AD3d 977, 978 [2007]). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed (see e.g. Matter of Jacob EE. [Autumn HH.], 118 AD3d 1179, 1179 [2014]; Matter of Trenton G. [Lianne H.], 100 AD3d 1124, 1125 [2012]). Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.-3- 521292

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         953,648
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,978,238
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,000
<INVENTORY>                                    800,742
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,828,522
<PP&E>                                         622,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                 368,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,403,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,413,501
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,176,826
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,148,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,403,422
<SALES>                                      9,275,889
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,275,889
<CGS>                                        3,441,793
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,441,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,532,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,229
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,255,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,069
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,252,630
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,252,630
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsCommentaries     Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians
        
            Commentaries
 Keyword
 Type Select a CategoryTop StoriesMission/TrainingFeaturesSecretary of the AFAF Chief of StaffChief Master Sgt. of the AFCommentariesSequestration NewsSpace/TechnologyHumanitarianAFSO 21Women's History Month 1-15EnvironmentalWarrior CareDiversityDignified TransferSafetyHeritageAir Force FamilyPersonnel MattersCommander's Call TopicsHaiti Earthquake ReliefDon't Ask Don't TellSuicide PreventionWarrior GamesEnergyAircraftEtchbergerSexual AssaultOperation TomodachiOperation Odyssey Dawn2011 Appropriations InformationHurricane Irene9/11AFAWeek in PhotosThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their Words2012 Appropriations InformationAfrican American History MonthAfrican American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29Fiscal Year BudgetAir Force StoriesColorado WildfireChief of Staff ArchiveHurricane IsaacAFA 2012APP RSSAPP Airman VisualsExpeditionary OperationsHurricane SandyTransition GPSAir Force in SpaceSports/RecreationH1N1Women's History Month 16-30Oklahoma Tornado ReliefMemorial DayCOVID-19 CommentariesCOVID-19
 RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 Dec. 5, 2019Depression can offer opportunity for reconnection
        Depression can be spurred by a range of factors such as a change in life circumstances, a change in lifestyle behaviors, loss of a loved one, loss of a job, or even loss of hope. The antidote for depression often begins with talking to people.  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1785 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1785

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to require State approving 
agencies to approve courses of education that have been accredited and 
approved by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or association, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 14, 2009

  Mr. Ensign introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to require State approving 
agencies to approve courses of education that have been accredited and 
approved by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or association, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MANDATORY APPROVAL OF ACCREDITED COURSES.

    Section 3675(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``A State'' and inserting ``Subject to 
        subsection (b), a State'';
            (2) by striking ``agency may'' and all that follows through 
        ``such courses have'' and inserting the following: ``agency--
            ``(A) shall approve the courses offered by an educational 
        institution when such courses have'';
            (3) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) through (D) as 
        clauses (i) through (iii), respectively; and
            (4) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by adding ``and'' after ``or association;''; 
                and
                    (B) by inserting before clause (i), as redesignated 
                by paragraph (4), the following new subparagraph (B):
            ``(B) may approve the courses offered by an educational 
        institution when--''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Probe Manufacturing, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Quarterly Report for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:  November 13, 2008   /s/  Barrett Evans ---------------------- Barrett Evans Interim Chief Executive  Officer    Date:  November 13, 2008   /s/  John Bennett ------------------------ John Bennett Chief  Financial  Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 LEGACY BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Rule 13a  14(a) / 15d-14(a)
 I, Stephen M. Conley, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Legacy Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:
July 7, 2006
    
    /s/ Stephen M. ConleyStephen M. ConleyChief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Treasurer
 23