alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51032

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANCISCO JAVIER MARTINEZ-SANDOVAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:06-CR-560-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco Javier

Martinez-Sandoval raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA) Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 11:12 AM To: 'CoastalLuxuryFilms@gmail.com' Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Inform ation - Coastal Luxury Films



### Dear Ms. Virabov:
This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-1212). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.
* Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Televisi on Operations Manual (MPT OM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Secti on 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by 7/14/15. If we do not receive the in formation, we will close the docket without notifying you further.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9521.
Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman Program Analyst | Rulemaking FAA Office of Aviation Safety Airmen and Airspace Rules Division 202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-21154 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BUSARI DANIAN, a/k/a Ubong Okon Mbatt, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-92-CR-283-9

- - - - - - - - - - February 12, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Busari Danian has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and we have independently reviewed counsel’s brief, the points raised by Danian in response to that brief, and the record, and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
IN IT I AL REVI EW ENG I NEERI NG R EPORT PMN : 15 - 0 1 04 Focus R eady Draft 1 2/ 1 8/2014 ENG I N EER : Proth ero \ EV PV ( kg/yr) : 50 , 000 SUBMI TTER : Nanosys I nc .

MSDS : Yes Labe l : No Gen Eqpt : Safety g l asses wi t h s i de - shie l ds . Long s l eeved clothi n g . Ch emi cal resista n t apron . Impervious gloves comp r i sed o f mat erial s pass ing ASTM F - 739 tes ti ng . Resp ir ator : Fu l l f ace - p i ece a i r pur ifying r esp ir ator w i th a h i g h effi ciency particu l ate a i r f il te r P 1 00 (or N1 00/ R 1 00) cartr idges . H

ea l t h Ef f ec t s : Fumes may cause eye a n d resp i ra t ory i r r i ta t ion . May cause lung damage . Ove r exposure may cau se central ne r vous system depress i on . Breat h i ng h i gh conce n trations can cau se i r regular h eartbeats w h i ch may be f a t a l. Poten t ial rep r odu ct i ve h azard . Con t a i ns a know n or s u spected carc in ogen . Contains a know n or suspec t ed r eprodu ct i ve toxin . Ex t remely fl ammable l i qu i d a n d vapor . Vapo r may cause f l ash f i re or exp l osion .

### Consumer Use : No SAT (concern s) ( 1 2/ 1 2/ 2 0 1 4 ) : Re l ated Ca s es a n d M i s e SAT Same as X - 1 3 - 1 . Ana l ogs : Migrat ion to grou ndwater : PBT ra ti ng : P 3 B ?T 1 H

ea l t h : 2 De r mal , I nhalat i o n Eco : 1 No releases to wate rOCCU PAT I ONAL EXPOSURE RAT I NG : l B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPT I ONS :

POLLUT ION PREVENT I ON CONS I D ERAT I ONS : No ne . EXPOSURE - BAS E D R EVI EW : NoIN ITI AL REVI EW ENG I NEER I NG REPORT es/ Location : 1 Na n osys - Hil l v i ew M il pitas CA 9 5 035 Days/y r : 255

ENV I RONMENTAL R E LEASES ESTIMATE S U MMARY The daily re l eases l isted for any source be l ow may coi n c i de with dai l y r e l eases fr om the othe r sources to t he same medium . Per submi ss i on , any waste mat er i a l wi l l be co ll ec t ed and d i sposed by i nc i ne r a ti on . No o t her r e l ease media a r e expected . I n c i ne r at i o n Ou t put 2 : 9 . 0E - 3 kg/s it e - day ove r 255 days/yr fr om 1 s i te s i te - r fr om 1 s i te or 2 . 3E + O kg/yr - a ll s i tes

R

E LEAS E TOTAL 2 . 3E + O kg/yr - al l s i tes

### IN IT I AL REVI E W ENG I NEER I NG REPORT Nanosys - Hil l view Mi l pitas CA 95035 Days/yr : 255

ENV I RONMENTAL R ELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Inc i neration H

igh End : 5.9E + O kg/si t e - day over 255 days/yr

R

ELEAS E TOTAL 1 .5E + 3 kg/yr - al l sites s i te
EXHIBIT
32.1





AULTRA
GOLD INC.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Aultra Gold Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rauno Perttu, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company  and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: November
      14, 2009
            By:
            /s/ 
      Rauno
      PerttuRauno
      PerttuChief
      Financial Officer
O rder filed April 18, 2013



## In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

___________



### No. 11

- 1 3

- 00 0 14

- CV

__________

LONE STAR TRANSMISSION, LLC , Appellant

V.

WILKS RANCH TEXAS, LTD. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 91st District Court

Eastland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV1242569

O R D E R

Lone Star Transmission, LLC, the appellant in this cause, has filed in this court an

unopposed motion to abate the appeal for sixty days

. In the motion, Lone Star states tha t

abatement is sought “to facilitate ongoing discussions between the parties regarding a potential

settlement” and to serve judicial economy. Lone Star also states that the motion is not opposed.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is abated

.

PER CURIAM

April 18, 2013

P anel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1493 

To designate the current and future Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

Center in Louisville, Kentucky, as the ‘‘Robley Rex Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2009 

Mr. MCCONNELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the current and future Department of Veterans 

Affairs Medical Center in Louisville, Kentucky, as the 

‘‘Robley Rex Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBLEY REX DEPARTMENT 

4 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Af6 fairs Medical Center in Louisville, Kentucky, and any suc7 cessor to such medical center, shall after the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1493 IS

1 ‘‘Robley Rex Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

2 Center’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula4 tion, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

5 States to the medical center referred to in subsection (a) 

6 shall be considered to be a reference to the Robley Rex 

7 Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Provens, Appellant.

(No. 31179

Decided October 8, 1947.)

*Mr. Milton J. Andrews,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. A. J. Layne,*for appellee.

*Mr. George E. TyaeJc*and *Mr. Abraham Gertner,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this - appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
Express 

DEmRTMENTOF 

-AN3P0RWI0N 

- ^Kt:T OPERATIONS 

0 m ?U P 3: 25 

leniil Dcpartmeni 

3620 Harts Cross Road 

Building B. 3rd Floor 

MemplMS,TN 38125 

Telephone 90143<t saoo 

VIA E-MAIL 

August 3, 2010 

Mr. Paul L. Gretch - Director 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Brazil Cargo Charter Authorizations Procedures 

Dear Mr. Gretch: 

Federal Express Cotporation ("FedEx Express") hereby files this letter in support of the 

recent filings of Atlas Air, Inc. ("Atlas") and United Pai-cel Service Co. ("UPS") 

regarding the Brazil Cargo Charter Authorizations Procedures.' FedEx Express agrees 

with the position and comments articulated by Atlas and UPS, including, but not limited 

to, the alternate proposal contained in the August 2, 2010, UPS letter. 

FedEx Express would also like to point out that, given the large number of charter 

opportunities available, a charter operator could effectively operate as a scheduled 

operator (up to five weekly flights, for the monthly maximum permitted under the existing 

rules). Such a charter operator could offer quasi-scheduled services with such charter 

grants while continuing to participate freely in the ad hoc charter market, from which the 

opei'atoi-s actually holding scheduled authority are barred. Such disparate opportunities 

should not be mandated by the regulator. 

Furtheiinore, given the facts that (I) numerous opportunities went unused last year, (2) 

the present rules limit charter operators from requesting more than 20 a month and (3) the 

number of potential charter operators is declining, it is clear that the existing mles mean 

that waste of scarce opportunities will be repeated this year. Not only is this an 

inappropriate rationing of limited opportunities, but it means that U.S. shippers will not 

be allowed adequate choice in the U.S.-Brazil charter markets and competition will be 

artificially constrained. 

To the extenl required, FedEx Express respectfully requests leave to file this response witli the 

Departnienl. 
Thanlc you in advance for considering the views of FedEx Express on this matter. 

Very truly yours, 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

Courtney E. Felts J 

Senior Attorney 

Regulatory Affair's 

(901) 434-8632 

(901)434-8283(1) 

cefei ts@fedex .com 

CEr'Vg32S09 

cc: Mary Street 

Esta Rosenberg 

Brian Hedberg 

All persons on attached service list 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by 

electronic mail on all persons named below: / 

( : ^<'y(^-

Pierre Muiphy - Arrow 

Russell E. Pommer-Atlas 

William C. Evans - Centurion 

Marshall Sinick - Florida West 

Mark W. Atwood - Kalitta 

Kevin Montgomery - Polar 

Aaron Goerlich - Southern Air 

Jason Maddox 

David Vaughn-UPS 

pmuiphy@lopmurphy.com 

russell.pommer@atlasair.com 

bill@mietuslaw.com 

msinick@ssd.com 

matwood@sherblackwell .com 

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com 

agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com 

jmaddox@ggh-airlaw.com 

dvaughn@kelleydiye.com
EXHIBIT 31.1





AULTRA GOLD INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302





I, Rauno Perttu, Chief Executive Officer of Aultra Gold Inc., certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, of Aultra Gold Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared; and





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial
reporting;





5. The issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls over financial reporting.


Date: August 12, 2009
By:
/s/  Rauno PerttuRauno PerttuPresident and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





AULTRA
GOLD INC.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Aultra Gold Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q /A for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Rauno Perttu, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company  and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  October
      29, 2009
            By:
            /s/ 
      Rauno
      PerttuRauno
      PerttuPresident
      and Chief Executive
              Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1882 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1882

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ethylene-vinyl 
                          acetate copolymers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ethylene-vinyl 
                          acetate copolymers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ETHYLENE-VINYL ACETATE COPOLYMERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.55 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to ethylene-vinyl acetate 
copolymers) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and by inserting 
``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

Brown, Kelly

From: Sasser, Erika

Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 4:51 PM

To: Brown, Kelly

Subject: FW: Ozone NAAQS Interagency Review Materials

Attachments: O3 NAAQS NPRM draft Executive Summary 11-13-14.docx; Ozone ICR Supporting 

Statement Proposed Rule 111214 draft.pdf; Ozone NAAQS ICR2014 Cost Spreadhseet 

Proposed Rule 111214.pdf; Ozone Season Analysis 111314.pdf; Ozone Season Attachment 

A Ozone Season Maps 111314.pdf; Ozone Season Attachment B Distribution Charts 

111314.pdf; Ozone Season Attachment C Detailed Infomation by State 111314.pdf; PAMS 

Network Design Options 111314.pdf; EPA Report EPA-600-R14-432 -Ozone FRM 

111214.pdf; Ozone Data Handling 111314.pdf; Summary of EPA responses to Interagency 

Comments Under EOs 12866_13563_OzoneNAAQs_NPRM.docx

Please post email and attachment(s) to Ozone NAAQS Rulemaking docket. Thanks 

From: Sasser, Erika 

Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 6:21 PM 

To: 'Frey, Nathan J.' 

Cc: Kimber Scavo; Wesson, Karen; Hemby, James; Mathias, Scott; Elman, Barry (Elman.Barry@epa.gov); Cooperstein, 

Sharon 

Subject: Ozone NAAQS Interagency Review Materials 

Nathan— 

Below you will find a variety of materials for Interagency reviewers on the O3 NAAQS NPRM. These include: 

• The draft executive summary from the NPRM 

• The EPA responses to the first batch of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13565 (as sent by OMB 

10/27 and amended 11/12) 

• The draft ICR supporting statement for the monitoring season expansion and spreadsheet showing the details of 

the cost estimates 

• Four technical memos on the following topics: 

1. The technical memo and 3 attachments for the proposed changes to the ozone monitoring seasons 

2. The technical memo for the proposed changes to the PAMS Network Design 

3. ORD's EPA Report EPA/600/R-14/432 for the proposed FRM/FEM provisions 

4. Ozone data handling technical memo 

I hope that these materials are helpful to the interagency reviewers. Please let me know if we can provide anything 

further with regard to these materials. 

Thanks, 

Erika
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-KSB AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             809
<SECURITIES>                                     6,825
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,541
<ALLOWANCES>                                       690
<INVENTORY>                                      6,086
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,466
<PP&E>                                           4,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,670
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,301
<BONDS>                                            849
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              139
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,341
<SALES>                                          3,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,818
<CGS>                                            2,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (5)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (5)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    257
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       252
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>