alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|**Exhibit
99.6**
|----------------

KPMG LLP
    
    Telephone
    
    (514)
      840-2100Chartered Accountants
    
    Fax
    
    (514)
      840-2187600 de
      Maisonneuve Blvd. West
    
    Internet
    
    www.kpmg.caSuite
      1500Montréal, Québec
      H3A 0A3






ACCOUNTANTS
CONSENT

The Board of DirectorsTembec Inc.

We consent to the use of our report
on the consolidated financial statements dated November 15, 2006, except as to
note 22 (b), which is as of December 5, 2006, included in this annual report on
Form 40-F. We also consent to the use of our report dated November 15, 2006 on
the Reconciliation to United States GAAP included
in this annual report on Form 40-F.















|KPMG, a Canadian
      limited liability partnership is the Canadianmember firm of KPMG
      International, a Swiss cooperative.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
exv10w64



 





Exhibit 10.64




FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     This First Amendment to Employment Agreement is entered into and effective as of June 15, 2006
(the Effective Date”), by and between Cyberonics, Inc (the “Company”) and David S. Wise
(“Employee”).



RECITALS




     WHEREAS, the Company and Employee previously entered into an Employment Agreement dated
September 17, 2003 (the “Agreement”), which Agreement remains in full force and effect as of this
date. The Company and Employee now desire to amend the Agreement as
provided herein.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth in this Amendment and other
good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:



TERMS




     1. Section 2 of the Agreement (“Term”) is deleted in its entirety and the following
provision is inserted therefor:




“Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, unless sooner
terminated pursuant to Section 5 of this Agreement, Employee shall be
employed by the Company commencing on the Effective Date and terminating
on June 1, 2009 (the “Term”). Termination of this Agreement shall not
alter or impair any rights of Employee (or his beneficiaries or heirs)
with respect to payments, benefits or other rights provided by the terms
of this Agreement, arising before or after the end of the Term.”



     2. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the provisions of the Agreement
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused the Amendment to be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Cyberonics, Inc.	 	Employee:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Robert P. Cummins
	 	/s/ David S. Wise
	 

	 	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Robert P. Cummins
	 	David S. Wise
	 

	 	Chairman of the Board of Directors and	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Executive Officer
#### LOUISE D. ROBINSON *v.*COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES

*Louise D. Robinson,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided April 28, 1998

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 902 (AC 17117), is denied.
# Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Midwest Air Group, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (the Company),
hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/  Timothy E. Hoeksema

---

/s/  Curtis E. Sawyer

---

Date: February 18, 2005
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1826 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain glass snow globes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21, 2009 

Mr. BAUCUS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain glass snow 

globes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GLASS SNOW GLOBES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Glass snow globes, not festive 

(provided for in subheading 

7013.99.50) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1826 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 13.1



906 CERTIFICATION



April 15, 2015



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Telecom Italia S.p.A. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2014 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Marco Patuano, the Chief Executive Officer, and Piergiorgio Peluso, the Head of Administration, Finance and Control, of Telecom Italia S.p.A., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Telecom Italia S.p.A.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/S/    MARCO
PATUANOName:

Marco PatuanoTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/S/    PIERGIORGIO
PELUSOName:

Piergiorgio PelusoTitle:

Head of Administration, Finance and Control
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2284

In Re: BARBARA MICHELLE BUSH,

Petitioner.

No. 11-1493

In Re: BARBARA MICHELLE BUSH,

Petitioner.

On Petitions for Writs of Mandamus.

(8:10-cv-02191-AW; 8:10-cv-02953-AW;

8:11-cv-00777-AW; 8:11-cv-00960-AW)

Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 14, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barbara Michelle Bush, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Barbara Michelle Bush has filed petitions for writs of 

mandamus seeking an order compelling the district court to stop 

assigning a particular judge to her cases and for that judge to 

stop reviewing her cases, and to correct the record in a case 

filed in a federal district court in Texas. Mandamus is a 

drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 

(1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). 

Mandamus relief is available only where there is no other 

available remedy. In re Braxton

In addition, we ordered Bush to show cause as to why 

she should not be sanctioned for filing frivolous original 

actions in this court and enjoined from filing any further 

original actions in this court unless she pays the sanctions.

, 258 F.3d 250, 261 (4th Cir. 

2001). Because Bush had other means of pursuing the relief she 

seeks, mandamus relief is not available. Accordingly, we deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Bush’s motions for 

appointment of counsel, and deny the petitions for writs of 

mandamus. 

*

 * This court previously sanctioned Bush for filing frivolous 

appeals and enjoined her from filing further actions in this 

court unless she pays the sanctions and a district court finds 

that the appeal is not frivolous.

 
3

We find her response fails to show cause why sanctions and an 

injunction should not be imposed. Therefore, Bush is now 

sanctioned $500 for filing frivolous original actions in this 

court and enjoined from filing further original actions in this 

court unless she pays the sanctions. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITIONS DENIED
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the: (i) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-87658) pertaining to the ValuJet Airlines, Inc. 1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the ValuJet Airlines, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan, (ii) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-91624) pertaining to the ValuJet Airlines, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (iii) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-98568) pertaining to the Airways Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan and 1995 Director Stock Option Plan, (iv) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-62863) of AirTran Holdings, Inc., (v) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-83048) of ValuJet Airlines, Inc., (vi) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-82727) pertaining to the AirTran 1996 Stock Option Plan, (vii) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-41480) of AirTran Holdings, Inc., (viii) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-103209) pertaining to the AirTran Holdings, Inc. 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and (ix) Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-67300) of AirTran Airways, Inc., of our report dated January 27, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of AirTran Holdings, Inc. and our report dated January 27, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of AirTran Aiways, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.
                                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 26, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of China Clean Energy Inc. (the “Company”).  I, Tai-ming Ou, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that, based on my knowledge:





(1)
The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in this report.





Date: August 13, 2010

By:
/s/ Tai-ming OuName:
Tai-ming OuTitle:
President and Chief Executive Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, David M. Kepler, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Greenville FederalFinancial Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issueras of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date: November 10, 2006 /s/ David M. Kepler   David M. Kepler   President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10.65

                       AMENDMENT TO THE INDENTURE OF LEASE

                   NOTICE OF USE OF ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE

Pursuant  to  Section  15.03,  Entire Agreement, of the Indenture of Lease dated
August  1,  1998,  between  Woodruff  Properties,  Landlord,  and  OmniCall,
Incorporated,  Tenant, the parties hereby execute the following modifications to
their  agreement:

     (1)  The term of said lease shall be extended for a period of two (2) years
commencing  August  1,  2001  and  ending  July  30,  2003

     (2)  Tenant hereby agrees to pay monthly rent of $12,856.30 to the landlord
beginning  with  the  payment  period  starting  August 1, 2001 and as otherwise
specified  in  the  Indenture  of  Lease,  and

     (3)  Except  for the extension of term and new rent amount described above,
all  other  terms of the Indenture of Lease dated August 1, 1998 shall remain in
full  force  and  effect and are hereby accepted and ratified as set forth fully
herein.

     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Landlord and the Tenant have respectfully signed
and  sealed  this  Amendment  to  the  Indenture  of  Lease as of the 9th day of
February,  2001

                                           WOODRUFF  PROPERTIES

                                           By: /s/ Frank Rogers
                                              --------------------
                                          Its:  Partner
-------------------                            -------------------

                                           OMNICALL  INCORPORATED

                                           By: /s/ Aloysius T. Lawn IV
                                               -------------------
                                           Its:  EVP-General Counsel
                                               -------------------
# EUR-Lex - 32006M4176 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32006M4176

**Commission Decision of 10/05/2006 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.4176 - DEUTSCHE BANK ET AL / DEUTSCHE STEINZEUG CREMER & BREUER) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

| |Brussels, 10/05/2006

SG-Greffe(2006) D/202491/202492/202493/202494

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject : Case No. COMP/M.4176 - DEUTSCHE BANK ET AL / DEUTSCHE STEINZEUG CREMER & BREUER Notification of 29/03/2006 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C-85 , 08/04/2006, page 9.

1. On 29.03.2006 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertakings Deutsche Bank AG (“DB”, Germany), Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (“GS”, United Kingdom) and Lone Star Fund V (“LS”, USA and Bermuda) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the undertaking Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer AG (“DSCB”, Germany) by way of purchase of shares following a debt restructuring plan.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for DB: universal banking services;

- for GS: investment banking and securities;

- for LS: private equity investments;

- for DSCB: manufacturer and distributor of ceramic tiles.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5(b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004[2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission, signed, Philip LOWE Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION
Exhibit
      32.1





**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of InferX Corporation, a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
      that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
      (the
“Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained
      in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:August
              12,2008
            
            
            /s/
              B.K.
              GogiaChairman
                of the Board(Principal
                  Executive, Financial and
                Accounting
                  Officer)




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not
      being filed as a separate disclosure document.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 22

- 14028 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus SCOTT P. HAINES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 3:22

- cr
- 00004

- MCR

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-14028 Document: 22-1 Date Filed: 05/03/2023 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 22

- 14028

Before N EWSOM , G RANT , and B RASHER , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Donald M. Sheehan, counsel for Scott Haines in this directcriminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent revi ew of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Haines’s convic tion and sentence are AFFIRMED

. USCA11 Case: 22-14028 Document: 22-1 Date Filed: 05/03/2023 Page: 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

s0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

138228 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138228 

 COA: 280087 

Wayne CC: 07-005809-01 

LEONDO EUGENE FORD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 23, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of ESE Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Christopher M. Armstrong, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated this 14th day of October, 2009.














CHRISTOPHER ARMSTRONGChristopher M. Armstrong
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer