alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**OFFIf OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

questing matter.
4th Honorable I. I. Masale County Auditor Xllbarger **Couuty** Vernon, Texar Dear Sir:



### rof resent date reIIthe above ~stated

s of September Distrlo t Clerk
eal onany copy

hat the two ohargee are ldentloal.’ mewhere oneaharga 1s applioable

provisiona or Ii. B, No. 642, 49th Legislature, referred to in your lcttsr, as well at the type of rrerrlor coritaaaplated for t&erespeotlre fees prescribed, yc?aare adrisad, a8 follows : **(1)** *Certlfloate and seal onanyoooy” involves the dbtrlat elerk.8 **service** la preparing aeertlfloato andatflxlng his seal thereto, andattaohlng- .

Honorable F. L. Masai*, page 2

said aertliloats and oral to s oopy of an ln#trumant on lile in his otrioe, when said oopy~4ias bean proparrd by aam psraon other than th& **dir-.** triot olerk. In thla lnstanoe the oler merely aartlfles that apartloular aopy of M Lntrwmt is **a true**  an4 eorrrot aopy o? sn original lnstrasent onills In his oftios, and it doaa not fnvalve the duty of the aotual preparation of the COPY

l (2) “Faoh oertlflaats o? any fasts aontalnsd in him

ii “lnld th di tl rot 8lork*8 8rrrloes &%ohi~“h2~ reiordi. meparing a **rtatrmrnt** of the laatter 

### or iaot tovdiiofi he ~ertliler and his aertltleatr to sama. This ir dlatingalshable froa **the serviaes**  **oantemplated in**  (1) ia that it ir not oontsqplated that **the olerk**  **ln** (1) will preparethe oo+ ,of the instrmant whioh heoertlfirn f8 a rue andoorreot oopy, while in (2) It is oontsmplated that the 61erk will prepare tha rtatsmenh of the matter m taot to xhlah he aertltlrs, or will transorlbo namefrom the original, aa well as maka the oartifioats 

### tosuoh faot. **?#a trust**  that tha foregohg ratlsfaotori.lY anmars your lnquirle*, Your8rery trulf, &f .:, f ~> ;.‘: ATTORHBY OlcNmAL

or TEXAS

aAB:ddt
Exhibit 32.1





Certification

of

PSB Holdings, Inc.

under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of PSB Holdings, Inc. (the Company) certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d), and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



Date:  March 15, 2010



|                         
|-------------------------
|PETER W. KNITT           
|Peter W. Knitt           
|President and CEO        
|                         
|                         
|SCOTT M. CATTANACH       
|Scott M. Cattanach       
|Treasurer                
|(Chief Financial Officer)





This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by PSB Holdings, Inc. for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| 1.   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                |   |                                        |
|---------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                |   |                                        |   |
| March      30, 2009 | By:    | /s/ George      J. Coates              |   |
|                |   | George      J. Coates                       |   |
|                |   | President,      Chief Executive Officer and |   |
|                |   | Principal      Executive Officer            |   |

|   |   |                                    |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                    |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Barry      C. Kaye             |   |
|   |   | Barry      C. Kaye                      |   |
|   |   | Treasurer,      Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   | and      Principal Accounting Officer   |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MIDWEST
EXPRESS HOLDINGS, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTH
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          24,498
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                       376
<INVENTORY>                                      3,468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,776
<PP&E>                                         156,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,872
<BONDS>                                          3,362
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,797
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               252,663
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  225,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   114
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,603
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,216
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,387
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,387
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.82
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.66 MB)

Tags:Loglines, January 2019, Fort Belvoir Commander’s Cup, Team Achievement

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 99.3

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Coates International, Ltd., on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("Report"), I, George J. Coates, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Coates International, Ltd., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Coates
International, Ltd as of and for the period covered by the Report.



Dated: November 2, 2005                 COATES INTERNATIONAL, LTD.

                                        By: /s/ George J. Coates
                                            ---------------------
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Principal Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1337 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1337

 To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the 
               numerical limitations on immigrant visas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2009

  Mr. Akaka (for himself, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Kennedy, and Ms. Cantwell) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the 
               numerical limitations on immigrant visas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Filipino Veterans Family 
Reunification Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM IMMIGRANT VISA LIMIT.

    Section 201(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1151(b)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(F) Aliens who are eligible for a visa under paragraph 
        (1) or (3) of section 203(a) and who have a parent who was 
        naturalized pursuant to section 405 of the Immigration Act of 
        1990 (Public Law 101-649; 8 U.S.C. 1440 note).''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UROQUEST MEDICAL CORPORATION, INCLUDING THE
NOTES THERETO, OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,980,128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,205,490
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,557,618
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,944,075
<PP&E>                                       7,681,572
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,982,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,159,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,798,473
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,356
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,426,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,159,047
<SALES>                                     17,603,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,603,575
<CGS>                                        8,931,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,931,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,205,366
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,221,787)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   100,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,321,787)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,321,787)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
#### Maureen A. Stancage, Respondent, v Vaughn F. Stancage, Appellant.

Appeals (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) (1) from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court (Hickman, J.), *inter alia,*ordering equitable distribution of the parties’ marital property, entered January 9, 1990 in Orange County, upon a decision of the court, and (2) from an order of said court, entered April 3, 1990 in Orange County, which denied defendant’s motion for, *inter alia,*reargument.

Because defendant served his notice of appeal more than 30 days (CPLR 5513 [a]), plus five days for mailing (CPLR 2103 [b] [2]), after the date of service of a copy of the amended judgment and notice of its entry, his appeal therefrom must be dismissed as untimely. Furthermore, although defendant claims that service upon defendant’s counsel of record was after the time that they were discharged as counsel, there is no evidence in the record to show that the discharge was done in the method prescribed by law; therefore, such service was adequate to fulfill the statutory requirements of service *(see,*CPLR 321 [bj; *Siegel v Obes,*112 AD2d 930). With respect to defendant’s appeal from the order denying his motion to reargue, that too must be dismissed inasmuch as such a denial is not subject to appeal *(see, Great Commn. v Northeastern Communications,*159 AD2d 921).

Appeals dismissed, without costs. Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation of Saybolt LP, as a Commercial Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation of Saybolt LP, as a commercial 
laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12, 
Saybolt LP, 109 Woodland Dr., Laplace, LA 70068, has been accredited to 
test petroleum, petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable 
oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 
151.12. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory 
analyses should request and receive written assurances from the entity 
that it is accredited by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 
conduct the specific test requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding 
the specific test this entity is accredited to perform may be directed 
to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. 
The inquiry may also be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c0f0e1c42000d0e041d2c08041f420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f5c5d4f11535e5d574e7f5b574c11585049">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the 
Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers 
and accredited laboratories.

http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/

DATES: The accreditation of Saybolt LP, as commercial laboratory became 
effective on September 29, 2011. The next triennial inspection date 
will be scheduled for September 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Mocella, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: February 22, 2012.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-5116 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Randall GURULE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 82CA1405.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Nov. 15, 1984.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 13, 1984.

Certiorari Denied April 29, 1985.

Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., Maureen Phelan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

David Vela, State Public Defender, Claire Levy, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

ENOCH, Chief Judge.

The defendant, Mark Randall Gurule, appeals from the judgment of conviction en*10tered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of felony murder. We affirm.

In a previous appeal of this matter, the defendant’s convictions for extreme indifference murder in the first degree, attempt to commit first degree murder after deliberation, and aggravated robbery were reversed, and the cause was remanded for a new trial on the charges of felony murder, attempt to commit first degree murder after deliberation, and aggravated robbery. *See People v. Gurule,*628 P.2d 99 (Colo.1981) appealing after remand 196 Colo. 562, 593 P.2d 319 (1978). In reversing the conviction for extreme indifference murder, the court stated:

> “The jury’s verdict of guilty to extreme indifference murder did not explicitly or implicitly resolve the defendant’s guilt to the crime of felony murder.... Murder by extreme indifference and felony murder are separate and distinct offenses, each of which carries the same penalty, and neither of which is the lesser offense of the other. The defendant, therefore, may be retried for the crime of felony murder.”

In a petition for rehearing the defendant challenged the remand order on the basis that a retrial on the felony murder charge would violate the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. That petition was denied. Thereafter, the defendant filed a motion in the trial court to dismiss the felony murder charge on the same grounds alleged in his petition for rehearing. That motion was also denied.

Defendant’s sole contention is that his retrial on the felony murder charge violated his constitutional protection against double jeopardy. *See*U.S. Const. amend. V; Colo. Const. art. II, § 18.

Defendant recognizes that, under the doctrine of the law of the case, a decision on an issue of law made at one stage of the case becomes binding precedent to be followed in successive stages of the same litigation, *see, e.g., People v. Casey,*192 Colo. 568, 563 P.2d 2 (1977), but argues that this doctrine is a discretionary rule of practice which should not be applied here. This court, however, is bound by the mandate of the Colorado Supreme Court in *People v. Gurule, supra,*and cannot, as defendant would have us do, reconsider and reverse that mandate. *Cf. Pope Heating & Air Conditioning Co. v. Garrett-Bromfield Mortgage Co.,*29 Colo.App. 169, 480 P.2d 602 (1971).

Judgment affirmed.

KELLY and METZGER, JJ., concur.