alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.1



906 CERTIFICATION



May 27, 2005



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W

Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:



The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the Telecom Italia S.p.A. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Marco Tronchetti Provera, the Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors, Carlo Orazio Buora, the Chief Executive Officer, and Enrico
Parazzini, the Chief Financial Officer, of Telecom Italia S.p.A., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Telecom Italia S.p.A.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Marco Tronchetti ProveraName:

Marco Tronchetti Provera Executive Chairman/s/ Carlo Orazio BuoraName:

Carlo Orazio Buora Chief Executive Officer/s/ Enrico ParazziniName:

Enrico Parazzini Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4908]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Corporate Administration Committee Board of Directors; Sunshine 
Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 1 p.m., Thursday, March 8, 2012.

PLACE: 1325 G Street NW., Suite 800, Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.

STATUS: Open.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate 
Secretary, (202) 220-2376; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aacfc2cbc6c6eac4dd84c5d8cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d2b7bab3bebe92bca5fcbda0b5">[email protected]</span></a>.

AGENDA: 
I. Call to Order
II. Executive Session
III. Severance Policy
IV. Board Committee Composition/Elections/Appointments
V. Washington, DC Lease Update
VI. Human Resources Updates
VII. Benefit Activities
VIII. Strategic Planning Update
IX. Adjournment

Erica Hall,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4908 Filed 2-27-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7570-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| **Caterpillar Financial Asset Trust 2003-A**                                    |                  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
|                                                                                 |                  |  |  |
| **STATEMENT TO CERTIFICATEHOLDER**                                              | **EXHIBIT 99.2** |
|                                                                                 |                  |  |  |
| **ORIGINAL DEAL PARAMETERS**                                                    |                  |
| Certificate Balance                                                             |                  | $10,243,196.21 |
|                                                                                 |                  |  |  |
| **INPUTS FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD STATEMENT TO CERTIFICATEHOLDER**                  |                  |
| Certificate Balance                                                             |                  | N/A |
|                                                                                 |                  |  |  |
| **CALCULATION OF DISTRIBUTABLE AMOUNTS**                                        |                  |
| Deposit to Certificate Distribution Account from Collection Account plus        | $6,526,811.13    |
| Deposit to Certificate Distribution Account from Principal Distribution Account | $0.00            |
| Deposit to Certificate Distribution Account from Reserve Account                | $0.00            |
| Total Deposit to Certificate Distribution Account                               | $6,526,811.13    |
|                                                                                 |                  |  |  |
| **DISTRIBUTIONS FROM CERTIFICATE DISTRIBUTION ACCOUNT**                         |                  |
| 1.  Principal to Fixed Rate Certificateholders                             | $0.00            |
| 2.  Any remaining amounts to the Seller                                    | $6,526,811.13    |
| 3.  Amount of Principal being paid on Certificate                          | $0.00            |
|      per $1,000 original principal balance                  | $0.00            |
|                                                                                 |                  |  |  |
| **SUMMARY OF DISTRIBUTIONS**                                                    |                  |
| Certificates Principal Paid                                                     | $0.00            |
| Ending Certificates Principal Balance                                           | $10,243,196.21   |
| Certificate Pool Factor                                                         | 1.00             |
|                                                                                 |                  |  |  |
| Remaining amounts to the Seller                                                 | $6,526,811.13    |
|                                                                                 |                  |  |  |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7569

ROBERT LAWRENCE TAYLOR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-1188) Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 29, 2001 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lawrence Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert Lawrence Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Director Va. Dep’t of Corrections , No. CA-00-1188 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 5, 2000; entered Oct. 6, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1725 

To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to remove retroactive immunity protection for electronic communications service providers that participated in the Terrorist Surveillance Program and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2009 

Mr. DODD (for himself, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. LEAHY, and Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 

to remove retroactive immunity protection for electronic 

communications service providers that participated in the 

Terrorist Surveillance Program and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Retroactive Immunity 

5 Repeal Act’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1725 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN PROTECTIONS FOR ELEC2 TRONIC COMMUNICATION SERVICE PRO3 VIDERS. 

4 (a) REPEAL.—The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance 

5 Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), as amended by the 

6 FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–261; 

7 112 Stat. 2436), is amended by striking title VIII (50 

8 U.S.C. 1885 et seq.). 

9 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

10 in the first section of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance 

11 Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), as amended by sec12 tion 202 of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (Public 

13 Law 110–261; 112 Stat. 2471), is amended by striking 

14 the items relating to title VIII. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the quarterly report
of Shamika 2 Gold, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Henry Riedl, President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                     |  |                                                                             | 
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: August 3, 2012 |  | /s/ Henry Riedl                                                             | 
|                     |  | Name:  Henry Riedl                                                          | 
|                     |  | Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer and Interim Financial Officer | 
|                     |  | (Principal Executive and  Accounting Officer)                               |
November 18, 1954

R. Stevenson, Jr. OpinionNo. S-147 Administrator Texas Liquor ControlBoard P. o. Box 56 Austin 61, Texas
Dear Mr. Stevenson: Re: Subpoena power of Texas Liquor ControlBoard under Section 7 of Article 666,Vernon's Penal Code,

Your recent letter asks this office for an opinion on the followingquestion:

"Wedesire your valued opinion as to whether or not thisDepartment under Section 7 of Article 666, Penal Code of Texas, has the authority to issue a subpoena-tocompel the production of the personal records and accounts of all officers and atoakholdera of a corporationholding a permit or iicense issuedby the Texas Liquor ControlBoard. Section 7, supra, provides, in part: "TheBoard, the Administratorand any inspector under the direction of theBoard, shall for the purposes contemplatedby this Act, have power to issue subpoenas, compel the attendance of witnesses, administer oaths, certify to official acts, take depositionswithin or without the State of Texas, as now providedby law, and compel the production of pertinent books, accounts, records, documents,and testimong." (Emphasisadded.)
In the light of the quoted statutoryprovision, your question is answered in the affirmative,qualified to the extent that the personal records and accounts of all officers and atockholders of a corporationholding a permit or license issuedby theBoard are pertinent to thematters under investigation. The subpoena shouldbe specific in the description of the records and accountswanted, by date, title, substance,or the eubject to which they relate. Ex Parte Gould, 60 Tex. Crlm. 442, 132 S.W. 364 (1910).Hon. Coke R. Stevenson, Jr., page 2 (S-147)

SUNMARY

The Texas Liquor Control Board may issue a subpoena to compel the production of the personal records and accounts of all officers and stockholdersof a corporation holding a permit or license Issued by theBoard, provided such personal records and accounts are pertinent to the matters under investigationand the subpoena is specific in the description of the records and accountswanted, by date, title, substance, or the subject to which they relate. Art. 666, Sec. 7,V.P.C., and Ex Parte Gould, 60 Tex. Grim. 442, 132 S.W. 364 (1910).

APPROVED: Yours very truly, Rudy 0. Rice JOHN BEN SREPPERD State Affairs Division ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS J.'A.'Amis, Jr. Reviewer
W. V. Geppert Reviewer Robert S. Trotti First Assistant JohnBen Shepperd Attorney General HW/rt By&r+ HoraceWimberly Assistant
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsCommentaries     Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians
        
            Commentaries
 Keyword
 Type Select a CategoryTop StoriesMission/TrainingFeaturesSecretary of the AFAF Chief of StaffChief Master Sgt. of the AFCommentariesSequestration NewsSpace/TechnologyHumanitarianAFSO 21Women's History Month 1-15EnvironmentalWarrior CareDiversityDignified TransferSafetyHeritageAir Force FamilyPersonnel MattersCommander's Call TopicsHaiti Earthquake ReliefDon't Ask Don't TellSuicide PreventionWarrior GamesEnergyAircraftEtchbergerSexual AssaultOperation TomodachiOperation Odyssey Dawn2011 Appropriations InformationHurricane Irene9/11AFAWeek in PhotosThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their Words2012 Appropriations InformationAfrican American History MonthAfrican American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29Fiscal Year BudgetAir Force StoriesColorado WildfireChief of Staff ArchiveHurricane IsaacAFA 2012APP RSSAPP Airman VisualsExpeditionary OperationsHurricane SandyTransition GPSAir Force in SpaceSports/RecreationH1N1Women's History Month 16-30Oklahoma Tornado ReliefMemorial DayCOVID-19 CommentariesCOVID-19
 RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 June 5, 2017Serving with pride
        I am an American Airman. I am a warrior. I have answered my nation’s call.I am a wingman, a photojournalist and a husband.I am gay.  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, William W. Smith, Jr., certify that:

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Smith Micro Software, Inc.; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: April 17, 2018 | /s/ William W. Smith, Jr.             |   |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | William W. Smith, Jr.                 |   |
|                 | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                 | (Principal Executive Officer)         |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Vital Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30. 2010 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 18, 2010



        By: /s/ Michael Levine
        -------------------------------
        Michael Levine
        Chief Executive Officer and
        Principal Executive Officer


Date: June 18, 2010

        By: /s/ Henry Goldberg
        -------------------------------
        Henry Goldberg
        Chief Financial Officer,
        Principal Financial Officer and
        Principal Accounting Officer

<PAGE>
#### E. E. Ropes, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. C. W. Lansing and J. J. Curry, Late Copartners Doing Business Under the Name and Style of Lansing & Curry, *Defendants in Error.*

Appellate Practice — Final Judgment Necessary to Support Writ of Error — Dismissal as to One Co-Defendant Not a Final Judgment.

1. There must be a final judgment to support a writ of error.

2. Where there are two co-defendant^ to a suit and one of them demurs to the declaration, and upon the sustaining of such demurrer the suit is dismissed as to such demurring defendant, but is still pending as to the other defendant, such order dismissing the case as to such defendant is not such a final judgment as will support a writ of error.

This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Volusia county.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*E. E. Ropes, in pro per.*

No appearance for defendants in error.

*232Per Curiam.

The plaintiff in error sued' the defendants in error as copartners in an action of assumpsit. The defendants appeared in the suit and thereafter defaults were entered by the clerk against them for want of plea, answer or demurrer.

On September 2nd, 1899, the plaintiff filed his proofs and the clerk entered a final judgment thereon in his favor against C. W. Lansing and J. J. Curry, late copartners doing business under the name and style of Lansing & Curry.

On November 14th, 1899, more than sixty days after the entry of final judgment, the defendant Lansing moved the court to vacate the judgment, which motion the court granted on the same day it was filed, and the defendant Lansing demurred to the declaration. This demurrer was sustained, and the plaintiff amended his declaration. The amended declaration was demurred to by Lansing, and on November 22nd, 1901, the court sustained the demurrer, and dismissed the case as to Lansing.

On April 22nd, 1902, the plaintiff sued out of writ of error to this court. The writ of error was not sued out within six months of the date upon which the court granted defendant Lansing’s motion to open up the final judgment against the copartnership *(Einstein’s Sons et al. v. Davidson, admx.,*35 Fla. 342, text 351, 17 South. Rep. 563), but was taken within six months from the date on which the court dismissed the case as to Lansing, and that judgment doubtless was the basis upon which the writ of error issued. This, however, was not a final judgment, as the case was still pending as to Curry, so far as this order could affect the status of the parties. *Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.,*148 U. S. 262, text 264, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 590, and cases therein cited.

The writ of error is dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error.

*233Taylor, C. J., and Hooker and Shackleford, JJ., concur.

Carter, P. J., and Maxwell and Cockrell, JJ., concur in the opinion.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-5114, -5115 FRANCISCO JAVIER RIVERA AGREDANO and ALFONSO CALDERON LEON,

Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 05-CV-608, Judge Emily C. Hewitt.

ON MOTION Before NEWMAN, 

### Circuit Judge. ORDER The cross-appellants move for leave to file a 19,000-word opening brief. The cross-appellants also move for an extension of time to file their opening brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion for leave to file a 19,000-word opening brief is denied. The motion for an extension of time is granted. The cross-appellants' opening brief, not to exceed 16,500 words, is due no later than June 8, 2009. FOR THE COURT


### MAY 18 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk COUIVRWIA Int ttU (iMUL/11"
MAY 1 8 2009 Date

JAN lithionti CLERKcc: Teresa Trucchi, Esq.

Patricia M. McCarthy, Esq. s8

2008-5114 - 2 -
EXHIBIT
32.1




AULTRA
GOLD INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Aultra Gold Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q /A for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Rauno Perttu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company  and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:  October
      29, 2009
              By:
              /s/ 
      Rauno
      PerttuRauno
      PerttuChief
      Financial
                Officer