alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 372 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 308 Nebraska Reports GARRISON v . OTTO Cite as 308 Neb. 372

Margaret L. Garrison, appellee, v. Logan M. Otto II, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed February 5, 2021. No. S-20-386. Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: John A. Colborn , Judge. Affirmed. Edith T. Peebles, of Brodkey, Cuddigan, Peebles, Belmont & Line, L.L.P., for appellant. Adam R. Little, of Ballew Hazen, P.C., L.L.O., for appellee.
Heavican , C.J., Miller

- Lerman , Cassel , Stacy, Funke , Papik , and Freudenberg , JJ. Per Curiam

. This is an appeal of a domestic abuse protection order, which we moved to our docket. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1106(3) (Cum. Supp. 2018). The court, having considered the oral arguments and hav

ing reviewed the record de novo, finds that the domestic abuse protection order entered by the trial court should be affirmed. Affirmed. Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 03/05/2021 01:09 AM CST
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0 657 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ETHAN JOSEPH MURPHY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 29 , 20 20 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brie f on appeal.

Electronically signed by: James Jeremiah Shea Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 22 2020

05/22/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0657
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:43 PM

To: 'mogriffin@earthlink.net'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Request for Additional Information: G5 Drones

May 12, 2015 

Dear Mr. Griffin: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0560). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by 

Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and 

remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the 

requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by May 26, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
| **EXHIBIT 11**                                     |
|----------------------------------------------------|
|                                               |
| **PROFESSIONAL VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD.**         |
|                                               |
| **Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings** |
| (in thousands, except per share data)              |

 
| The following table sets forth the computation of basic earnings per share: |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|                           |   | July 31,   |   | July 31,   |   | July 31,   |   | July 31, |   | July 31, |
|--------------------------------|--------|------------|--------|------------|--------|------------|--------|----------|--------|----------|
|                           |   | 2002       |   | 2003       |   | 2004       |   | 2005     |   | 2006     |
|                           |   | (Restated) |   | (Restated) |   | (Restated) |   |     |   |     |
| Numerator:                     |   |       |   |       |   |       |   |     |   |     |
| Net income                     | $      | 1,109      | $      | 3,214      | $      | 2,978      | $      | 2,536    | $      | 2,392    |
|                           |   |       |   |       |   |       |   |     |   |     |
| Denominator:                   |   |       |   |       |   |       |   |     |   |     |
| Weighted average common shares |   |       |   |       |   |       |   |     |   |     |
| outstanding                    |   | 1,546      |   | 1,733      |   | 1,197      |   | 1,254    |   | 1,409    |
|                           |   |       |   |       |   |       |   |     |   |     |
| Earnings per common share      | $      | 717.14     | $      | 1,854.47   | $      | 2,487.77   | $      | 2,022.61 | $      | 1,697.62 |
II 

Calendar No. 292 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1453 

[Report No. 111–142] 

To amend Public Law 106–392 to maintain annual base funding for the 

Bureau of Reclamation for the Upper Colorado River and San Juan 

fish recovery programs through fiscal year 2023. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2009 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. BENNET, Mr. BENNETT, and Mr. HATCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

MARCH 2, 2010 

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 106–392 to maintain annual base 

funding for the Bureau of Reclamation for the Upper 

Colorado River and San Juan fish recovery programs 

through fiscal year 2023. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1453 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau of Reclamation 

3 Fish Recovery Programs Reauthorization Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF BASE FUNDING FOR FISH 

5 RECOVERY PROGRAMS. 

6 Section 3(d)(2) of Public Law 106–392 (114 Stat. 

7 1602) is amended in the fourth sentence by striking 

8 ‘‘2011’’ and inserting ‘‘2023’’. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS

dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 292 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1453 

[Report No. 111–142] 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 106–392 to maintain annual 

covery programs through fiscal year 2023. the Upper Colorado River and San Juan fish rebase funding for the Bureau of Reclamation for 

MARCH 2, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Ernest R. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of Cutter & Buck Inc.,certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form10-K/A of Cutter & Buck Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

 
| Dated:  August 27, 2004 |                                          |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                          |
|                         | /s/  ERNEST R. JOHNSON                   |   |
|                         | Ernest  R. Johnson                            |
|                         | Chief  Financial Officer                      |
|                         | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Transderm Laboratories Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,
      acting in the capacity of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





**SIGNATURE**
            
            **TITLE**
            
            **DATE**/s/
                Andy Yurowitz
              Andy
                Yurowitz
            
            President
                andChief
                ExecutiveOfficer
            
            February
                27, 2007
#### KATHY’S FOOD STORES, INC., dba Time Out Food Stores, a Utah corporation, and Jay Slaughter and Vaughn Nelson, individuals, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. EQUITABLE LIFE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Utah corporation, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 870394.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 3, 1988.

Rehearing Denied April 27, 1988.

Richard L. Halliday and Michael A. Neider, Midvale, for plaintiffs and appellants.

Daniel W. Anderson, Patrick L. Anderson, and Gary E. Jebber, Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Respondent’s motion to dismiss this matter is hereby granted on the ground that the order appealed is not a final judgment and this Court has no jurisdiction. *See*Utah R.Civ.P. 54(b).

A majority of the Court is in favor of granting sanctions pursuant to Rule 33, Rules of the Utah Supreme Court, on the ground that this appeal is frivolous and was brought for delay. This matter is remanded for the purpose of taking evidence on the amount of reasonable attorney fees awardable to respondent for bringing the motion for summary disposition.

STEWART, Associate C.J., and HOWE, J., dissent from the ruling on sanctions.
## DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

Standard Operating Permit Condition XIV – Document Submittals and Electronic Copies

Permit Condition for Air Quality Permits Adopted by Reference in 18 AAC 50.346

August 20. 2008Standard Permit Condition XIV – Document Submittals and Electronic Copies August 20. 2008

2 

## Standard Operating Permit Condition XIV – Document Submittals and Electronic Copies

Emission Unit or Stationary Source Categories This Condition Applies to:

 Condition XIV.1 applies to all sources and Permittees subject to 18 AAC 50.326(a)-(c).

The department will use Standard Permit Condition XIV in any operating permit unless the department determines that emission un it or stationary source specific conditions more adequately meet the requirements of 18 AAC 50.

Permit Wording:

<

Insert Section Number here > - Permit Changes and Renewal

1. The Permittee shall comply with the following requirements for submitting application information to the US E nvironmental Protection Agency (EPA):

1.1 The permittee shall provide a copy of each application for modification or renewal of this permit, including an y compliance plan, or application addenda, at the time the application or addendum is submitted to the department;

1.2 The information shall be submitted to the same address as in Condition

< insert reference to Annual Co mpliance Certification condition subparagraph with EPA’s address>;

1.3 To the extent practicable, the permittee shall provide to EPA applications in portable document format (pdf); MS Wo rd format (.doc); or other computerreadable format compatible with EPA's national database management system; and

1.4 The permittee shall maintain records as necessary to demonstrate compliance
with this condition.
[18 AAC 50.040(j)(7), 18 AAC 50.326(b), 12/1/04] [40 CFR 71.10(d)(1)), 7/1/04]Standard Permit Condition XIV – Document Submittals and Electronic Copies August 20. 2008

3 STATEMENT OF BASIS FOR THE PERMIT CONDITIONS

The state and federal regulations for each Condition are cited in Operating Permit

No. < Insert Operating Permit Number here >.

Condition <insert condition cross-reference> , Permit Applications and Submittals

Applicability: Applies because the permittee may need to submit permit applications and related correspondence.

Factual Basis: Condition XIV directs the applicant to send copies of all application materials required to be submitted to the Department directly to the EPA, in electronic format if practicable. Th is condition shifts th e burden of compliance from the Department to ensure that copies of application materials are submitted to EPA by transferring that res ponsibility to the Permittee.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 23-2068

CRYSTAL HARRIS;

KADEYJA DIXON-FOWLER,

Appellants

v.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY LARRY KRASNER;

BRIAN KEAN; ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY;

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

(E.D. Pa. No. 2-22-cv-00839)

Present: HARDIMAN, PORTER and AMBRO, Circuit Judges

1. Motion by Appellees Brian Kean and Larry Krasner for Redesignation of 

Opinion as Precedential and Request for Correction

Respectfully,

Clerk/CJG

_________________________________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing Motion is GRANTED. The Not Precedential opinion previously issued 

was drafted primarily for the parties. As the opinion will now be issued as a Precedential 

opinion, the text of the original opinion has been modified because it is now binding 

authority. The Judgment entered June 6, 2024 is not changed. The time for filing a 

petition for rehearing is extended until 14 days after the date of this order. 

By the Court,

s/ Thomas M. Hardiman

Circuit Judge

Dated: July 22, 2024

Tmm/cc: All Counsel of Record
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:      August 14, 2008
    By:
    /s/ H. Kerr Taylor, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of AmREIT
Monthly 
Income & Growth III
Corporation, the 
General Partner of
AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund
III, Ltd. 24
FinalReport00LSIMedienceCorporation100003004005006007c0800900100011c1200130014cc1500160017c018001900200021002200230000.,.,N00"'N000000N00000033
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00102

- CV

EX PARTE N.C.

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 26744

ORDER

N.C., a prison inmate, appealed the trial court’s order denying his petition for

expunction. His brief is due March 20, 2017. On January 25, 2017, N.C. filed a “Motion

for an Order of a State Amicus Curiae Investigation Prior to Allowing the Appellant to

Invoke the Court Magistrate(s) Penal Authority

, ” complaining in part about his inability

to access his legal materials to prepa re his brief. The Court requests a response from the

State in this appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1(b) . Any response shall be filed with the Clerk

of this Court no later than 14 days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAME x parte N.C. Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Response requested

Order issued and filed February 15 , 2017
**EXHIBIT 23****Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants**To the Board of Directors     Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.     As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report datedOctober 7, 2004, except as to Notes 6 and 14 which is July 6, 2005, relating to the financialstatements of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd., which reportappears in Amendment No. 2 to theAnnual Report dated July 31, 2004 on Form 10-K/A of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.September 7, 2005                                                            /s/ Quick & McFarlin, P.C.   Quick & McFarlin, P.C.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Black Nickel Acquisition Corp. III
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
      Reckles, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                        Andrew Reckles
                Andrew
                        Reckles
                      Principal
                        Financial Officer
                      August
                        10,
                        2007
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with this Quarterly Report of AISystems, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen C. Johnston, Chief Financial Officer of AISystems, Inc., certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AISystems, Inc.
 
 
 Date: November 15, 2010                                                                         /s/Stephen C. Johnston
 Stephen C. Johnston
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION





I, Sean M. Gavin, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MangoSoft, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:





(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





By:
/s/ Sean M. GavinChief Financial OfficerMarch 31, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5346]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 14269-000, 14270-000]


Riverbank Hydro No. 22, LLC, FFP Project 93, LLC; Notice 
Announcing Filing Priority for Preliminary Permit Applications

    On February 28, 2012, the Commission held a drawing to determine 
priority between two competing preliminary permit applications with 
identical filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that 
neither of the applicants' plans is better adapted than the other to 
develop, conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water 
resources of the region at issue, the priority established by this 
drawing will serve as the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order 
of priority is as follows:
    1. FFP Project 93, LLC: Project No. 14270-000.
    2. Riverbank Hydro No. 22, LLC: Project No. 14269-000.

    Dated: February 29, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5346 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P