alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed October 25, 2012. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00860-CV

____________

DONALD RAY MCCRAY, Appellant

V.

DOUGLAS D. MULDER AND MICHELLE MULDER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 240th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-DCV-196144

ORDER

This is an attempted appeal from an order dismissing appellant’s cause of action 

under section 11.103 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Pursuant to chapter 

11 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Donald Ray McCray has been 

declared a vexatious litigant and is therefore subject to the pre-filing order under section 

11.101. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 11.101, 11.103 (West Supp. 2012).

Under section 11.103(a), the clerk of this court may not file an appeal presented by 

a vexatious litigant subject to a pre-filing order under section 11.101 unless the litigant 

obtains an order from the local administrative judge permitting the filing, or the appeal is 
from a pre-filing order entered under section 11.101 designating a person a vexatious 

litigant. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 11.103(a) & (d) (West Supp. 2012). This 

is not an appeal from a pre-filing order entered under section 11.101. 

This court will consider dismissal of this appeal unless appellant, within 10 days 

of the date of this order, files a copy of the order from the local administrative judge 

permitting the filing of this appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 11.103(a) 

(West Supp. 2012).

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 23
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Seventh Generation, Inc. and subsidiary on Form S-8 (File No. 33-85748) of our
report dated February 19, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Seventh Generation, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1997
and December 31, 1996, and for the years then ended, which report is included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.




/s/ Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.
Albany, NY 12207
March 17, 1998
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.24


                            UNITED DENTAL CARE, INC.
                               14755 Preston Rd.
                                   Suite 300
                              Dallas, Texas  75240


                               November 14, 1996


Peter R. Barnett, D.M.D.
14755 Preston Rd.
Suite 300
Dallas, Texas  75240

Dear Peter:

         This letter is intended to summarize the transactions between United
Dental Care, Inc. ("UDC"), OraCare Dental Associates, P.A. ("OraCare PA"), and
you.  As provided in the Stock Purchase Agreement between UDC, Frank A.
Pettisani, Sr., and OraCare PA, United Dental Care is required to designate an
assignee of its rights to acquire the shares of OraCare PA, and such assignee
must be a dentist duly licensed and in good standing in the State of New
Jersey.  You have agreed to become the designated assignee of UDC's rights
under the Stock Purchase Agreement and to acquire the OraCare PA shares under
the Agreement.

         UDC has agreed to loan to you the amount required to purchase the
issued and outstanding shares of OraCare PA.  The loan will be evidenced by a
note payable to UDC in the amount of the purchase price.  You will have no
personal liability under the note.  Instead, the note will be secured by a
Pledge and Security Agreement executed by you and UDC, providing for a security
interest in the shares of OraCare PA as the collateral for the note.

         Also you have agreed to sign an option agreement providing UDC, or its
assignee, the right to purchase all of your shares of OraCare PA on the terms
and conditions stated therein.  It is also contemplated that OraCare PA will
enter into a management agreement with OraCare Consultants, Inc.


<PAGE>   2


Peter R. Barnett
November 14, 1996
Page 2                 
--------------------




         If this letter accurately summarizes the transaction and the documents
to be executed in connection thereunder, please so indicate by signing below.



                                        Sincerely,
                                        
                                        UNITED DENTAL CARE, INC.
                                        
                                        
                                        By:    /s/ Mark E. Pape                
                                             -----------------------------------
                                        
                                        Its:   Sr. Vice President              
                                             -----------------------------------


Accepted and Agreed to:



/s/ Peter R. Barnett         
-----------------------------
Peter R. Barnett, D.M.D.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 12 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 12

  To require the Secretary of the Army to operate the Buford Dam/Lake 
             Sidney Lanier Project, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2010

 Mr. Isakson (for himself and Mr. Chambliss) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of the Army to operate the Buford Dam/Lake 
             Sidney Lanier Project, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INDUSTRIAL AND MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY, LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, 
              GEORGIA.

    (a) Requirement of Secretary of the Army.--Subject to subsection 
(b), the Secretary of the Army (acting through the Chief of Engineers) 
(referred to in this section as the ``Secretary'') shall operate the 
Buford Dam/Lake Sidney Lanier Project--
            (1) for the purpose of municipal and industrial water 
        supply; and
            (2) notwithstanding each limitation described in section 
        301(d) of the Water Supply Act of 1958 (43 U.S.C. 390b(d)), to 
        include storage in the project for water supply.
    (b) Condition.--Subsection (a) shall not apply unless the non-
Federal sponsor of the water supply storage described in subsection (a) 
pays the cost for the capital investment for reallocated storage space 
in accordance with each procedure that the Secretary determines to be 
necessary.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1(A)**

**Certification required by Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**

I, Dr. Lionel L. Reilly, certify that:

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation;

c)             disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

October 25, 2007

 

| /s/ Dr. Lionel L. Reilly         |
|---------------------------------------|
| Dr. Lionel L. Reilly             |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
#### Indian River State Bank, Plaintiff in Error, v. Liverpool and London and Globe Insurance Company, Defendant in Error.

(No. 2.)

Division A.

Writ of error to Circuit Court, Brevard county; Rhydon M. Call, Judge.

*624. Robbins & Graham and Geo. P. Raney for plaintiff in error.

A. W. Cockrell & Son for defendant in error.

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error. There was judgment for the defendant and the plaintiff takes writ of error. Judgment reversed on the authority of Indian River State Bank v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, *ante,*p. 283.

Decision *Per Curiam.*
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer****and Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Frezer, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin R. Keating,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Kevin R. KeatingKevin
                R. Keating
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              May
                9, 2008
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1398 

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to increase 

the payment rate for certain payments under the milk income loss contract program as an emergency measure. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 6, 2009 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 

to increase the payment rate for certain payments under 

the milk income loss contract program as an emergency 

measure. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Dairy Preser5 vation Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MILK INCOME LOSS CONTRACT PROGRAM. 

7 Section 1506(c)(3) of the Food, Conservation, and 

8 Energy Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 8773(c)(3)) is amended— 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1398 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as sub2 paragraph (E); and 

3 (2) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘(B) for the period beginning on October 

6 1, 2008, and ending on February 28, 2009, 45 

7 percent; 

8 ‘‘(C) for the period beginning on March 1, 

9 2009, and ending on November 30, 2009, 90 

10 percent; and 

11 ‘‘(D) for the period beginning on December 

12 1, 2009, and ending on August 31, 2012, 45 

13 percent; and’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of ESE Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A-1 for the period ended February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Christopher Armstrong, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 7thday of May, 2008.                                                                                                                      
|   

CHRISTOPHER ARMSTRONGChristopher ArmstrongChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

























---
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Each
      of
      the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of China
      Medicine Corporation (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 20,
      2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 13, 2007


/s/
                Senshan
                YangSenshan
                Yang
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (principal
                executive officer)





/s/
                Huizhen
                YuHuizhen
                YuChief
                Financial Officer
              (principal
                financial officer and accounting
                officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Billy Keith McGREGOR, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, the District Court of Hughes County, and the Honorable Gordon Melson, Respondents.

No. P-87-90.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Feb. 10, 1987.

ORDER GRANTING WRIT OF MANDAMUS

On September 24, 1986, this Court remanded 728 P.2d 846 (Case No. CRF-83-58 below) to the District Court of Hughes County for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the petitioner was entitled to a court-appointed psychiatrist under the holding of *Ake v. Oklahoma,*470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985). On remand, the petitioner filed a motion requesting the district court to hold the hearing ex parte. The motion was denied, and the petitioner now petitions this Court for a writ prohibiting inclusion of the district attorney at the hearing and ordering the district court to conduct the evidentiary hearing ex parte.

The intention of the majority of the *Ake*Court that such hearings be held ex parte is manifest from the following passage:

> The risk of error from denial of such assistance, as well as its probable value, are most predictably at their height when the defendant’s mental condition is seriously in question. When the defendant is able to make an *ex parte*threshold showing to the trial court that his sanity is likely to be a significant factor in his defense, the need for assistance of a psychiatrist is readily apparent.... In such a circumstance, where the potential accuracy of the jury’s determination is so dramatically enhanced, and where the interests of the individual and the State in an accurate proceeding are substantial, the State’s interest in its fisc must yield.

*Id.*at 1097.

NOW, THEREFORE, being fully advised in the premises, we are compelled to agree with the petitioner’s assertion that there is no need for an adversarial proceeding, that to allow participation, or even presence, by the State would thwart the Supreme Court’s attempt to place indigent defendants, as nearly as possible, on a level of equality with nonindigent defendants.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that the evidentiary hearing ordered by this Court be conducted ex *417parte; and that petitioner be required to show by competent evidence that he falls within the provisions of *Ake.*The Honorable Respondent is further ordered to make findings of fact and conclusions of law all of which shall be contained in a transcript to be transmitted to this Court for review.
#### Boyle, Treas., Appellee, *v.*The Public Adjustment & Construction Co. et al., Appellants.

*220(No. 31006

Decided May 28, 1947.)

*Mr. Frank T. Cullitan,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. John F. Smolka,*for appellee.

*Mr. Wm. H. Rosenfeld*and *Mr. Alfred Palay,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged, *sua sponte,*that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1716 

To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 to 

reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2009 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. LUGAR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring 

Act of 1998 to reauthorize the United States Advisory 

Commission on Public Diplomacy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF UNITED STATES ADVI4 SORY COMMISSION ON PUBLIC DIPLOMACY. 

5 Section 1334 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Re6 structuring Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6553) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘October 1, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 

8 2010’’. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
=========================================================================================================================================

UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, DC 20549

FORM 10-QSB/A-1

[X]
     Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 2006OR[ ]
     Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934For the transition period from to


COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 333-127388ROCHDALE MINING CORP.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

NEVADA
     N/A(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
     (IRS Employer Identification Number)


Unit 321 - 255 Newport DrivePort Moody, British ColumbiaCanada V6E 4H1(Address of principal executive offices)

(504) 639-7757(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X]  No [  ]

The Registrant is a shell company. Yes [X]   No [  ]



=========================================================================================================================================





---



PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6.       EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.The following Exhibits are attached hereto:

|Exhibit No. | Document Description                                                                    
|----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|31.1        | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
|            | Rule 13a-15(a) and Rule 15d-15(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of     
|            | 1934, as amended.                                                                       
|32.1        | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To 18     
|            | U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of    
|            | 2002.                                                                                   





































-2-

---

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to besigned on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on this 21stday of November, 2006.

ROCHDALE MINING CORP.(Registrant)BY:
     PAUL BROCKPaul BrockPresident, Principal Executive Officer,Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer andmember of the Board of Directors.BY:
     DAVID RAMBARANDavid RambaranSecretary and a member of the Board ofDirectors.




























-3-

---