alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed October 25 , 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00860

- CV

____________ DONALD RAY MCCRAY , Appellant

V.
DO UGLAS D. MULDER AND MICHELLE MULDER , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12

- DCV

- 196144



### ORDER
This is an attempted appeal from an order dismissing appellant’s cause of action
under section 11.103 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. P ursuant to chapter
11 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Donald Ray McCray has been declared a vexatious litigant and is therefore subject to the pre

- filing order under section 11.101. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 11.101, 11.103 (West Supp. 2012).
Under section 11.103( a), the clerk of this court may not file an appeal presented by a vexatious litigant subject to a pre

- filing order under section 11.101 unless the litigant obtains an order from the local administrative judge permitting the filing, or the appeal isfrom a pre

- filing order entered under section 11.101 designating a person a vexatious

litigant. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 11.103(a) & (d) (West Supp. 2012). This is not an appeal from a pre

- filing order entered under section 11.101.

This court will c onsider dismissal of this appeal unless appellant, within 10 days of the date of this order, files a copy of the order from the local administrative judge permit ting the filing of this appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 11.103(a) (West Supp. 2 012).

PER CURIAM
Order entered February 6, 2020

In the

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01348-CR

DETRICK BLAIR DEAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-82171-2015

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 4, 2020 second motion to extend time to file 

appellant’s brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or 

before February 11, 2020. If appellant’s brief is not filed by February 11, 2020, this appeal may 

be abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8. 

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-50764 and 333-58412 each on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No.
333-41886 on Form S-2 of our report dated February 22, 2002 (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph as to a
going concern uncertainty), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
MangoSoft, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 29, 2002
<PAGE>   1
   
                                                                EXHIBIT 3(a)(7)
    

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                      U.S. ALCOHOL TESTING OF AMERICA, INC.

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Adopted in accordance with the provisions
                    of Section 242 of the General Corporation
                          Law of the State of Delaware
   --------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is hereby certified that:

         FIRST: The name of the Corporation is U.S. ALCOHOL TESTING OF AMERICA,
INC.

         SECOND: The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby
amended by striking out the whole of Article FIRST thereof as it now exists and
inserting in lieu and instead thereof a new Article FIRST, reading in its
entirety as follows:

         "FIRST: The name of the Corporation is SUBSTANCE ABUSE TECHNOLOGIES,
INC. (hereinafter called the "corporation")."

         THIRD: The amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section
242 of the General Corporation law of the State of Delaware.

         Signed and attested to this 22nd day of October, 1996.

                         U.S. ALCOHOL TESTING OF AMERICA, INC.

                         By:      /s/ Robert M. Stutman
                                  ----------------------------------
                                  Robert M. Stutman
                                  Chairman of the Board

Attest:

/s/ Robert W. Berend
----------------------------
Robert W. Berend
Secretary



                                     E-58
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.74 MB)

Tags:Loglines, DLA Strategic Materials, November 2018, DLA Information Operations Research and Development

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                  OF THE
                   RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                    OF
                        FINET HOLDINGS CORPORATION
                                     
                          Pursuant to Section 242

FINET HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under and
by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does
hereby certify:

FIRST: That at a duly noticed and constituted meeting of the Board of
Directors of said corporation, the Board unanimously adopted the following
resolutions:

WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has determined that certain amendments to
the Corporation's Restated Certificate of Incorporation are advisable for
the best interests of the corporation and that said amendments should be
submitted to the shareholders for their consent and authorization as
provided for by Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That Article FOURTH of the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation be amended to read as
follows:

"FOURTH: Capital Stock. The total number of shares which the Corporation
shall have authority to issue is Sixty Million One Hundred Thousand
(60,100,000) shares, consisting of One Hundred Thousand (100,000) shares of
Preferred Stock, of the par value of one cent ($.01) per share (hereinafter
called "Preferred Stock"), and Sixty Million (60,000,000) shares of Common
Stock of the par value of one cent ($.01) per share (hereinafter called
"Common Stock").

SECOND: That, pursuant to Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of
Delaware, the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of
stock of the corporation entitled to vote, voted, via written consent, in
favor of this amendment, as adopted, pursuant to resolution by the Board of
Directors, and thus the necessary number of shares required by the statute
were voted in favor of, and consented to, the amendments.
<PAGE> 75

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, FINET HOLDINGS CORPORATION has caused this certificate
to be signed by L. Daniel Rawitch its Chief Executive Officer, on this day
October 29, 1997

FINET HOLDINGS CORPORATION

By: /s/ L. Daniel Rawitch
L. Daniel Rawitch CEO

Attest: /s/ Jan Hoeffel
Jan Hoeffel, Secretary

I hereby acknowledge that the signing of this Certificate is my act and
deed and the act and deed of the Corporation, and that the facts stated
herein are true.

Executed under penalty of perjury on October 29, 1997.

/s/ L. Daniel Rawitch
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1) The
accompanying Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended August 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                        |  |                               | 
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | 
|Date: November
 1, 2011 |  | /s/ David H.
 Roche           | 
|                        |  | President
 and               
|                        |  | Chief
 Executive Officer     
|                        |  |                              
|                        |  | /s/ Steven
 M. Caspers        | 
|                        |  | Executive
 Vice President and
|                        |  | Chief
 Financial Officer     

A signed original of this
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commissions or its staff upon request.

101

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     1996 Form 10K
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000853086
<NAME>                        Textainer Equipment Income Fund II, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,665
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,073
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               25
<PP&E>                                         61,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                 21,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 46,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,983
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     44,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   46,510
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,613
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  9,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (355)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,806
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,806
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WestCoast Golf Experiences, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Roger Arnet, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
5th day of December, 2006.


/s/ Roger Arnet
-----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Reinstated; Motion Granted; Order filed December 23, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00427

- CR

____________ NARJES MODARRESI , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1260243



### ORDER
On December 18, 2014, this court abated this appeal and requested that the trial court conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file appellant’s brief. Appellant’s counsel, Vivian R. K ing, filed a motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief, which contained a reasonable explanation for the late brief. Accordingly, we order the appeal REINSTATED. We GRANT appellant’s request for an extension of time to file appellant’s brief t o January 30, 2015, with a notation that no further extensions of time will be granted absentexceptional circumstances.

The request for the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason
for the failure to file a brief is WITHDRAWN.

PER CURIAM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUKETO SURENDRA DESAI; et al.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-73089

Agency Nos. A070-536-970

A070-536-969

A070-536-967

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. 

Suketo Surendra Desai, and his famly, natives and citizens of India, petition

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

FILED

JUL 06 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 06-73089

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

an adverse credibility determination, Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir.

2004), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on inconsistencies in the record regarding the timing and circumstances of

Desai’s brother’s death. See id. at 964 (we are bound to accept an adverse

credibility finding as long as one of the identified grounds is supported by

substantial evidence and goes to the heart of the petitioner’s claim). Desai was

provided with an adequate opportunity to explain these inconsistencies, but failed

to do so. See Kaur v. Gonzales, 418 F.3d 1061, 1066-67 (9thCir. 2005).

In the absence of credible testimony, Desai’s asylum and withholding of

removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Because Desai’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony found to be not

credible, and he points to no other evidence that shows it is more likely than not he

will be tortured in India, his CAT claim also fails. See id. at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0620. FULLER v. WHITEHEAD et al.

The appellant having moved to withdraw her appeal, the motion is hereby

GRANTED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/24/2016

May 24, 2016
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-0085 Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-078-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Identification 29.0 $2,465.0

0

$0 $2,465.00 24 $59,160.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $59,160

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Replacement 1.0 $ 85.00 0 $ 85.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0367

CITY OF MISSOULA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRIANNA NICOLE RANA,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including March 29, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

February 24 2022

02/24/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0367
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.41 MB)

Tags:DSCR, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, Fire & EMS, Defense Supply Center Richmond Virginia, DLA Installation Operations Richmond, People & Culture, Angel Tree

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery