alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Report of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (the Bank) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark R. Szczepaniak, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank.

Date: August 10, 2007



|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/  Mark R. Szczepaniak                                                
|Mark R. Szczepaniak Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation
150 South Wacker Drive, 28th Floor
Chicago, IL  60606
Tel. 312-499-5400
Fax  312-499-5406

GMAC Commercial Mortgage (LOGO)


GMAC Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.
Series 1999-C1
Annual Statement as to Compliance
For the Year Ended December 31, 1999

Pursuant to Section 3.13 of the Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement  governing the
referenced transaction, I hereby attest that:

xi.       A review of the activities of GMAC Commercial Mortgage  Corporation as
          Master Servicer during the period,  and of its performance  under this
          Pooling and Servicing Agreement, has been made under my supervision.


xii.      To the best of my  knowledge,  based on such review,  GMAC  Commercial
          Mortgage Corporation as Master Servicer, has fulfilled in all material
          respects its  obligations  under this Pooling and Servicing  Agreement
          throughout the period.


viii.     GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation, as Master Servicer, has received
          no notice regarding qualifications,  or challenging the status, of the
          Trust Fund as a REMIC or of the  Grantor  Trust as a  "grantor  trust"
          under the Grantor Trust  Provisions from the Internal  Revenue Service
          or any other governmental agency or body.

By:
Gary Severyn
Senior Vice President
GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation

Date:
4/26/00
From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/23/2010 11:04 AM

Subject: RE: Additional CO NAAQS materials

Thank you very much, Deirdre and Lydia, I will distribute them immediately.

On monitoring briefing, I suggested to Crystal that we schedule something at EPA’s convenience 1/6, 7 

or 8, but I have not heard back from her. Do you think we could confirm a time, before folks disappear 

for the holiday?

Best regards,

heidi
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Shengkai Innovations, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Wang Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Date:
      October 13, 2010
                      By:
                      /s/
      Wang ChenName:
      Wang ChenTitle:
                      Chief
      Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer
)
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4617]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 23, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. SCBT Financial Corporation, Columbia, South Carolina; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Peoples Bancorporation, Inc., and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The Peoples National Bank, 
both in Easley, South Carolina, Bank of Anderson, NA, Anderson, South 
Carolina, and Seneca National Bank, Seneca, South Carolina.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. United Group of Central Florida II, LLC, Longwood, Florida, to 
become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting 
shares of Citizens Bancorp of Oviedo, Inc., and thereby indirectly 
acquire voting shares of Citizens Bank of Florida, both in Oviedo, 
Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 23, 
2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-4617 Filed 2-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION — CEO**CERTIFICATION**I, Richard C. Rochon, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Coconut Palm Acquisition Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, is made known to us by others within such entity,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date: February 27, 2007/s/ Richard C. Rochon   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer   **(principal executive officer)**
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, John Bennett, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this quartely report of Probe Manufacturing, Inc.;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the period covered by this  report;  3.   Based on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in  all material respects  the  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this report;  4.   The registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such disclosure  controls  and              procedures  to  be  designed  under  our supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating to the registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which  this  report  is  being  prepared;  b)   evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure controls  and  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the  end  of  the  period  covered  by  this  report based on such evaluation;  and  c)   disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most  recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the  case  of  an  annual  report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably  likely  to  materially     affect,  the registrant's internal control  over  financial  reporting;  and  5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):  a)   all significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are  reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information; and  b)   any fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management or other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the registrant's internal  control  over  financial  reporting.     DATED  this  14th  day  of  May, 2007.   /s/  John Bennett ------------------------------- John Bennett Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 20, 2015 

# Order

October 20, 2015

152061 ( 53 )

SHAWLENE PERRY

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

GLENN M

- D COTTON and GLENN M

- D

COTTON, PLC

, Defendant s

- Appell ants

. SC: 152061

COA: 322069

Genesee CC: 13

- 099724

- NM

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the State Bar of Michigan’s Probate

and Estate Planning Section to extend the time for filing an amicus curiae brief on the

application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. An amicus brief will be accepted for filing

if submitted on or before November 10, 2015

.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.45



                       EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLANS FOR 1998


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                               Portion
                                                     Portion   Based on
                                             1998     Based   Personal
                                            Bonus     on EPS    Goals
       Executive Officer                    Maximum     (a)      (b)
-----------------------------------------   --------   ------ ----------
<S>                                        <C>        <C>      <C>
 William H. Wilcox, President, CEO ......   $325,000    100%       0%

 John W. McCarty, Senior Vice ...........   $131,250     85%      15%

 Peter R. Barnett, Senior Vice ..........   $123,750     85%      15%

 Jeffrey R. Gullo, Senior Vice ..........   $123,750     75%      25%

 Jeffrey P. Hollansworth, Senior ........   $123,750     75%      25%
</TABLE>


NOTES:

(a)  The percentage in this column reflects the portion of the maximum bonus
     that may be paid upon achievement of targeted earnings per share.  This
     percentage varies (up or down) based on earnings per share and may be
     reduced to zero if an established minimum level of earnings per share is
     not achieved.

(b)  The percentage in this column reflects the portion of the maximum bonus
     that may be awarded upon achievement of defined personal objectives.  Such
     objectives are individually designed to reflect the executive's functional
     responsibilities within the context of the company's strategic and
     tactical objectives.  This percentage may be reduced to zero if the
     defined personal objectives are not achieved.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Allocation of Capacity on New Merchant Transmission Projects and New Cost-Based, Participant-Funded Transmission Projects
Docket No. AD12-9-000.Priority Rights to New Participant-Funded Transmission
Docket No. AD11-11-000.Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
Docket No. EL10-72-001.( print page 12827)National Grid Transmission Services Corporation Bangor Hydro Electric Company
Docket No. EL11-49-000.Rock Island Clean Line LLC
Docket No. ER12-365-000.
 With respect to the workshop to be held by Commission staff on February 28, 2012 in Docket No. AD12-9-000, the following Commission staff are designated as non-decisional in deliberations by the Commission in this docket: Robert McLean, Office of the General Counsel; David Faerberg, Office of the General Counsel; David Maranville, Office of the General Counsel; and David Hunger, Office of Energy Policy and Innovation. Accordingly, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.2202 (2010), they will not serve as advisors to the Commission with respect to any of the above-referenced dockets. Likewise, as non-decisional staff, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.2201 (2010), they are prohibited from communicating with advisory staff concerning any deliberations with respect to the above-referenced dockets. Dated: February 27, 2012. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2012-5064 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1715 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1715

 To amend the United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 to 
  extend the authority of the Broadcasting Board of Governors to make 
          grants for the purpose of operating Radio Free Asia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2009

 Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Lugar) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 to 
  extend the authority of the Broadcasting Board of Governors to make 
          grants for the purpose of operating Radio Free Asia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF GRANT AUTHORITY FOR RADIO FREE ASIA.

    Section 309(f) of the United States International Broadcasting Act 
of 1994 (22 U.S.C. 6208(f)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 
2009'' and inserting ``September 30, 2010''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Master Sergeant George C. BAKER, Appellant, v. Major General John G. WAGGENER, and Honorable Martin Hoffman, Secretary of the Army, Appellees.

No. 75-1883.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 5, 1976.

Decided Aug. 25, 1976.

Francis L. Ruppert, Clayton, Mo., for appellant.

Burt C. Hurn, U. S. Atty. and J. Whitfield Moody, Asst. U. S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., and Edward C. Newton, IV, Captain, JAGC, U. S. Army, Military Personnel Branch, Litigation Div., Office of The Judge Advocate Gen., Dept, of the Army, Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before GIBSON, Chief Judge, and HEANEY and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges.

*1197PER CURIAM.

This case raises the issue as to whether a noncommissioned officer of the United States Army, who has been discharged “for the convenience of the Government” pursuant to Paragraph 5-3, Army Regulation 635-200, may seek a preliminary injunction in the District Court staying his discharge prior to the exhaustion of administrative remedies. The District Court held that he may not under the circumstances of this case, and we affirm. *Horn v. Schlesinger,*514 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1975). *See Sampson v. Murray,*415 U.S. 61, 94 S.Ct. 937, 39 L.Ed.2d 166 (1974).
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this order 

is not citable as precedent. It is a public order. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

05-5025, -5029 

PAYMASTER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING 

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit 

Judge. 

O R D E R

 A petition for panel rehearing was filed by the defendant-appellant, and a 

response thereto was invited by the court and filed by the plaintiff-cross appellant. 

 Upon consideration thereof, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

 The petition for rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of making the 

following changes to the original opinion entered on May 4, 2006, and reported at 2006 

WL 1228851 (Fed. Cir. 2006): 

 Page 10, line 3 delete “five-part” 

 Page 10, line 5 delete “five-part” 

 Page 12, line 4 replace “one” with “any” 

 Page 12, line 5 replace “either” with “any” 

 Page 12, line 5 delete “two”. 
The mandate of the court will issue on August 14, 2006. 

 FOR THE COURT

_August 7, 2006__ _s/ Jan Horbaly____________ 

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk

cc: Paul L. Brown, Esq. 

John J. Fargo, Esq. 

05-5025, -5029 2
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


      NAME OF CORPORATION
      -------------------
1.    United Dental Care of Texas, Inc., a Texas corporation.

2.    UDC Ohio, Inc. (d/b/a United Dental Care of Ohio, Inc.), an Ohio

      corporation.

3.    United Dental Care of Pennsylvania, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation.

4.    United Dental Care of Missouri, Inc., a Missouri corporation.

5.    UDC Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

6.    Associated Companies, Inc., an Arizona corporation.

7.    Associated Health Plans, Inc., an Arizona corporation.

8.    UDC Dental California, Inc., a California corporation.

9.    UDC Preferred, Inc., an Arizona corporation.

10.   United Dental Care Insurance Company, an Arizona corporation.

11.   United Dental Care of Arizona, Inc., an Arizona corporation.

12.   United Dental Care of Colorado, Inc., a Colorado corporation.

13.   United Dental Care of Indiana, Inc., an Indiana corporation.

14.   United Dental Care of Nebraska, Inc., a Nebraska corporation.

15.   United Dental Care of New Mexico, Inc., a New Mexico corporation.

16.   United Dental Care of North Carolina, Inc., a North Carolina

      corporation.

17.   United Dental Care of Utah, Inc., a Utah corporation.

18.   United Dental Care of Washington, Inc., a Washington corporation.

19.   Independent Dental Plans, Inc., a Michigan corporation.

20.   Association Dental Plan, Inc., a District of Columbia corporation.

21.   OraCare Consultants, Inc., a New Jersey corporation.

22.   OraCare DPO, Inc., a New Jersey corporation.

23.   Kansas City Dental Care, Inc., a Missouri corporation.

24.   United Dental Care, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation.