alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1575 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure that excess oil and gas 

lease revenues are distributed in accordance with the Mineral Leasing 

Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 4, 2009 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure that excess 

oil and gas lease revenues are distributed in accordance 

with the Mineral Leasing Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF OIL SHALE RESERVE RE4 CEIPTS. 

5 Section 7439(f) of title 10, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(3)(A) The moneys deposited in the Treasury under 

8 paragraph (1) that exceed the amounts described in sub9 paragraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (2) shall be transVerDate Nov 24 2008 05:10 Aug 05, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1575.IS S1575

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1575 IS

1 ferred by the Secretary of the Treasury in accordance with 

2 section 35 of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 191) 

3 to the State of Colorado for use in accordance with sub4 paragraph (B). 

5 ‘‘(B) Amounts transferred to the State of Colorado 

6 under subparagraph (A) shall be used by the State and 

7 political subdivisions of the State for— 

8 ‘‘(i) conservation, restoration, and protection of 

9 land, water, and wildlife resources affected by oil or 

10 gas development activities in Garfield and Rio Blan11 co Counties in the State; 

12 ‘‘(ii) repair, maintenance, and construction of 

13 State and county roads in each of those counties; 

14 and 

15 ‘‘(iii) the conduct of capital improvement 

16 projects (including the construction and maintenance 

17 of sewer and water treatment plants) that are de18 signed and carried out to address the impacts of oil 

19 and gas development activities in each of those coun20 ties.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Clark et al., Appellants.

(No. 31110

Decided October 8, 1947.)

*Mr. Frank T. Cullitan,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Norman 8. Minor,*for appellee.

*Mr. A. L. Kearns, Mr. B. B. Kearns*and *Mr. George F. Hayes,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Hart, Zimmerman, 'Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10119 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LATONYA RENA MILES, also know as So Fine, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-256-G

-------------------- December 14, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * LaTonya Rena Miles pleaded guilty to count 1 of a five-count indictment charging her with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute over one kilogram of cocaine base and has appealed his sentence. Miles contends that the district court erred in determining the quantity of drugs attributable to her. We review the sentencing court’s calculation of the quantity of drugs involved for clear error. United States v. Mergerson , 4 F.3d 337, 345 (5th Cir. 1993). A factual finding is not clearlyNo. 99-10119 -2- erroneous if it is plausible in light of the record read as a whole. United States v. Watson , 966 F.2d 161, 162 (5th Cir. 1992). Miles argues that the record does not support the attribution of two kilograms of cocaine base to her from an uncompleted transaction. Instead she argues that she should only be held responsible for 1.19 kilograms of cocaine base. The record reflects that Miles negotiated, intended to, and was capable of supplying this quantity of cocaine base. The uncontroverted facts in the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) and the testimony of Special Agent Brady of the Federal Bureau of Investigation support this finding. Miles has not produced any evidence to refute the report or Brady’s testimony. Because Miles did not present any rebuttal evidence, the district court was free to adopt those facts without further inquiry. See United States v. Mir , 919 F.2d 940, 943 (5th Cir. 1990). Miles has failed to show that the district court clearly erred in the amount of drugs attributed to her.
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1:  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
               Officer under Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant Section 906 of
               the Sarbanes-Oxley Act



               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Signal Advance, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2014 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



     /s/Chris M. Hymel

     Chris M. Hymel
     President/Treasurer


August 14, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1642 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1642

To reduce the national debt and eliminate the current slush fund at the 
Treasury Department by directing that proceeds from the Troubled Asset 
   Relief Program go toward a reduction in the statutory debt limit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 6, 2009

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce the national debt and eliminate the current slush fund at the 
Treasury Department by directing that proceeds from the Troubled Asset 
   Relief Program go toward a reduction in the statutory debt limit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save American Free Enterprise Act'' 
or the ``SAFE Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF STATUTORY LIMIT ON THE PUBLIC DEBT.

    Section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by inserting ``minus the aggregate 
        amounts described in subsection (d)'' before ``, outstanding at 
        one time''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Amounts described in this subsection are $80,893,000,000 plus 
any additional amounts which are received by the Secretary of the 
Treasury pursuant to section 106(d) of the Emergency Economic 
Stabilization Act of 2008 plus the interest and dividends attributable 
to those amounts after August 7, 2009.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Donald H. GREGORY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FOURTHWEST INVESTMENTS, LTD. dba Ellis R. Ivory a general partnership, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 870017.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 4, 1987.

Byron L. Stubbs, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.

Dennis C. Ferguson, Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.

*34ORDER

PER CURIAM:

In his docketing statement to this Court, counsel for appellant stated that “[jjurisdiction to hear this appeal is conferred on this Court by Rule 3, U.R.A.P.” We informed counsel by telephone that our appellate rules do not confer *jurisdiction*and requested that he amend the docketing statement, citing section 78-2-2 1 of the Judicial Code. His failure to comply with our request constrains us to dismiss the appeal. Utah R.App.P. 9(e).

So ordered.

STEWART, C.J., does not participate herein.

1

. In all cases appealed after January 1, 1987, reference to § 78-2-2 (1986 Cum.Supp.) above will be considered insufficient; instead the appropriate subsection must be included to alert this Court that it has original appellate jurisdiction over the case.
Pristine Solutions Inc.: Exhibit 4.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






[FRONT]

Form of Share Certificate

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

[LOGO] 

CUSIP NO. [sample] 

Pristine Solutions Inc.

AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK: 100,000,000 SHARES 
PAR VALUE:
$.0001 PER SHARE

THIS CERTIFIES THAT

[SAMPLE]

IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF __________________

     Shares of Pristine Solutions Inc.
Common Stock transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly
authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This
Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and
registered by the Registrar.

Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers.

Dated:

	 	 	 
	
      Secretary 
	
       
	
      President 



[PRISTINE SOLUTIONS INC. CORPORATE SEAL NEVADA]




[BACK]

Signature must be guaranteed by a firm which is a member of a
registered national stock exchange, or by bank (other than a savings bank), or a
trust company. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the
face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in
full according to applicable laws or regulations.

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not on the
above list.

For Value Received, _______ hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF
ASSIGNEE

	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	(Please print or typewrite name and address,
      including zip code or assignee) 
	 
	 		  Shares 
	 	  	 
	of the capital stock represented by the within
      certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 
	 
	 		  Attorney 
	 	 	 
	to transfer the said stock on the books of the
      within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.
    
	 
	Dated: 		 


NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with
the name as written upon the face of the certificate in every particular without
alteration or enlargement or any change whatever
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the bi-annual meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Aeronautical Charting Forum (ACF) to discuss informational content and design of aeronautical charts and related products, as well as instrument flight procedures development policy and design criteria.

# DATES:

The ACF is separated into two distinct groups. The Instrument Procedures Group (IPG) will meet April 24, 2012 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. The Charting Group will meet April 25 and 26, 2012 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be hosted by Innovative Solutions International, a Pragmatics, Inc. Company at 1761 Business Center Drive, Reston, VA 20190.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For information relating to the Instrument Procedures Group, contact Thomas E. Schneider, FAA, Flight Procedures Standards Branch, AFS-420, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125; telephone (405) 954-5852; fax: (405) 954-2528.

For information relating to the Charting Group, contact Valerie S. Watson, FAA, National Aeronautical Navigation Products (AeroNav Products), Quality Assurance & Regulatory Support, AJV-3B, 1305 East-West Highway, SSMC4, Station 4640, Silver Spring, MD 20910; telephone: (301) 427-5155, fax: (301) 427-5412.

                        The public must make arrangements by April 6, 2012, to present oral statements at the meeting. The public may present written statements and/or new agenda items to the committee by providing a copy to the person listed in the                         **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                         section not later than April 6, 2012, Public statements will only be considered if time permits.                    

Issued in Washington, DC, on February 28, 2012.

Valerie S. Watson,

Co-Chair, Aeronautical Charting Forum.

[FR Doc. 2012-5293 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
#### Robert Dale PUCKETT, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF REVIEW OF the INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF UTAH, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendant, Deseret Industries, Intervenor.

No. 860309.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Feb. 20, 1987.

*469Robert Dale Puckett, pro se.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Ralph L. Finlayson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendant.

Larry R. White, Salt Lake City, for inter-venor.

*Memorandum of Decision*

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Mr. Puckett appeals from a decision of the Industrial Commission denying him a formal hearing to determine eligibility for workers’ compensation benefits. Mr. Puckett was hired by Deseret Industries in Las Vegas, Nevada. While working there he suffered a debilitating injury. Mr. Puckett filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits in Utah because Deseret Industries is headquartered in this state. The administrative law judge determined that he was without authority to hear Mr. Puckett’s claim because Mr. Puckett was not “hired or ... regularly employed in this state,” as required by section 35-1-54 of the Code. U.C.A., 1953, § 35-1-54 (1974 ed.). We have reviewed Mr. Puckett’s arguments on appeal and conclude that they are without merit. He is not eligible for benefits under Utah law. The decision of the Commission is affirmed.

HALL, C.J., STEWART, Associate C.J., and HOWE and DURHAM, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1402 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount allowed 

as a deduction for start-up expenditures. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 7, 2009 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself and Mr. ALEXANDER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the amount allowed as a deduction for start-up expenditures. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Jump 

5 Start Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AMOUNT ALLOWED AS DEDUCTION 

7 FOR START-UP EXPENDITURES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 195 of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

10 at the end the following new paragraph: 


jbell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1402 IS

1 ‘‘(3) SPECIAL RULE FOR TAXABLE YEARS BE2 GINNING IN 2009, 2010, OR 2011.—In the case of a 

3 taxable year beginning in 2009, 2010, or 2011, 

4 paragraph (1)(A)(ii) shall be applied— 

5 ‘‘(A) by substituting ‘$10,000’ for 

6 ‘$5,000’, and 

7 ‘‘(B) by substituting ‘$60,000’ for 

8 ‘$50,000’.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred in tax11 able years beginning after the date of the enactment of 

12 this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Amendment to 2005 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Amendment to Technical Communications Corporation 2005 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan 
 Pursuant to
the resolution of the Board of Directors of Technical Communications Corporation adopted on November 9, 2006, Section 4(a) of the Technical Communications Corporation 2005 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan is hereby amended by deleting the
number “100,000” and inserting in its place the number “150,000” so that the first sentence of Section 4(a) now reads as follows: 
 “Subject to the provisions of Section 12 of this Plan, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock for which Options may be granted under the Plan is 150,000 shares of Common Stock.”

  

	
	TECHNICAL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
	
	 /s/ David A. White

	David A. White, Secretary
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT








I,
      Nicholas Gerber, Chief Executive Officer of Victoria Bay Asset Management,
      LLC,
      the general partner of United States Oil Fund, LP (the "Registrant"), certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




1.
      The
      quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarterly period ended
      June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.











Date:
      August 8, 2006










/s/Nicholas
      D. Gerber


-------------------------------------------


Nicholas
      D. Gerber, Chief Executive Officer


(principal
      executive officer)











CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT








I,
      Howard
      Mah, Chief Financial Officer of Victoria Bay Asset Management, LLC, the general
      partner of United States Oil Fund, LP (the "Registrant"), certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




1.
      The
      quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarterly period ended
      June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.











Date:
      August 8, 2006










/s/Howard
      Mah


---------------------------------------


Howard
      Mah, Chief Financial Officer


(principal
      financial officer)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED AMBER AYERS LARKIN,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v. Case No. 5D 16 - 1455 DENNIS MICHAEL LARKIN,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant. ________________________________/ Opinion filed January 13, 2017 Non
- Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Bob Leblanc, Judge. Marc James Ayers, of Bradley Arant Boult, Cummings, LLP, Birmingham Alabama, and Terry C. Young and Jennifer R. Dixon, of Lowndes Drosdic k Doster Kantor & Reed, P.A., Orlando , for Appellant /Cross
Appellee

. Andrew F. Nickolaou, and Ophe lia G. Bernal
- Mora, of Bernal
- Mora & Nickolaou, Winter Park, for Appellee /Cross
- Appella nt
. PER CURIAM. We affirm, without discussion, the trial court’s determination as to the proper distribution of the parties’ Morgan Stanley account pursuant to the terms of their marital settlement agreement. However, we conclude that the trial court erred in failing to award2

the former wife a reasonable attorney’s fee. The marital settlement agreement provided for an award of fees to the prevailing party “in the event of a legal action or other proceeding arising under this Agreement

. ” Here, the former wife prev ailed on the only significant issue resolved by the trial court in its post
- judgment order. Therefore, we reverse the portion of the trial court’s order denying the former wife’s motion for attorney’s fees. AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED

. TORPY , EVANDER and LAMBERT , JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**




**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Platinum Energy Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
      that:




The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the “Form
      10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in
      the
      Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      August 13, 2007


By:
            /s/
                Mark NordlichtMark
                NordlichtChairman
                of the Board (Principal Executive and Financial and Accounting
                Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Black Nickel Acquisition Corp. III (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael D. Pruitt, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





February 25, 2011
/s/ Michael D. PruittMichael D. Pruitt

Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer