alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CrowdGather, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Sanjay
Sabnani, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
CrowdGather, Inc., and will be retained by CrowdGather, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






/s/
      Sanjay SabnaniSanjay
      Sabnani
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
                  September
      15, 2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6770

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CLAUDIO CAMPANELLA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CR-92-444-A, CA-95-325-AM)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claudio Campanella, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Campanella Nos. CR-92-444-A; CA-95-325-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31
                           ==========


   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

     I, John Xinos, hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB of NorthTech
Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing  and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to Mistral Ventures, Inc., including
its subsidiaries, if any, is made known to us by others within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and

      c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.  The other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of our board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) that there were no significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect our ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have further advised our auditors that
there we are not aware of any material weaknesses in our internal controls;
and
b) that there was no fraud, whether or not material, that involved our
management or other employees who have a significant role in our internal
controls.

6.  The other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report
that there were no significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the
date of our most recent evaluation.

                              Mistral Ventures, Inc.
                              a Nevada corporation

May 27, 2006                  By:/s/ John Xinos
                              --------------------------------------
                              President, CEO, CFO, Principal
                              Accounting Officer and Chairman
                              of the Board of Directors
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Richard C. Larson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 ofWauwatosa Holdings, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the
-48-

 
   registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: July 31, 2006     /s/ Richard C. Larson Richard C. Larson  Chief Financial Officer  
-49-
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**Certification**

I, Tommy A. Moore, Jr.,certify that:

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-K of First Investors Financial Services Group, Inc.

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The Company’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theCompany and based on such evaluation:

a)        Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b)       Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report(based on such evaluation); and

c)        Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)        Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)       Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 24, 2007
|   | By: /s/ TOMMY A. MOORE, JR. |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | Tommy A. Moore,  Jr.        |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer    |

 

----
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS

S E C O N D D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S

CHIEF JUSTICE

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICES

SUE WALKER

BILL MEIER

LEE GABRIEL

ELIZABETH KERR

MARK T. PITTMAN

J. WADE BIRDWELL TIM CURRY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER

401 W. BELKNAP, SUITE 9000

FO RT WORTH, TEXAS 76196

- 0211

TEL: (817) 884

- 1900

FAX: (817) 884

- 1932

www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa CLERK

DEBRA SPISAK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

LISA M. WEST

GENERAL COUNSEL

CLARISSA HODGES

December 13, 2017

Barry J. Alford

1319 B allinger St.

Fort Worth, TX 76102

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Debra A. Windsor

Assistant District Attorney

401 W. Belknap St.

Fort Worth, TX 76196

- 0201

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 02

- 17

- 00148

- CR, 02

- 17

- 00149

- CR

Trial Court Case Nu mber: 1451483D, 1451837D

Style: Gary Deon Elbeyallen a/k/a Gary Deon Allen

v.

The State of Texas

The reporter ’ s record has been filed under the date of Tu esday, December

12, 2017 in the above referenced cause.

The appellant ’s brief is due Thursday, January 11, 2018

. See Tex. R.

App. P. 38.6. You will be notified when the case is set for submission.

A party desiring oral argument must note that request on the outside cover

of the party's brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.7

. If no oral argument is requested

by either party, the case may be submitted on the briefs

.

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THIS COURT HAS ADOPTED THE

STANDARDS FOR APPELLATE CONDUCT, WHICH WER E ADOPTED AND

PROMULGATED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS AND THE TEXAS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ON FEBRUARY 1, 1999 BY

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET ORDER NO. 99

- 9012. Copies of the standards

are available from this office and appear on the court's website at

www. txcourts.gov/2ndcoa

. Parties appearing before this court are expected

to adhere to these standards and non

- compliance will be addressed by the

court accordingly.02

- 17

- 00 148

- CR

December 13, 2017

Page 2

Respectfully yours,

DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK

By: Bonnie Alexander, Deputy Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4951]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13124-003]


Copper Valley Electric Association, Inc.; Notice of Extension of 
Time for Filing of Comments, Final Terms and Conditions, 
Recommendations, and Prescriptions

    As stated in a letter dated January 27, 2012, in this proceeding by 
the Director, Division of Hydropower Licensing, the date for filing of 
comments, final terms and conditions, recommendations, and 
prescriptions, and pursuant to the Notice of Application and Applicant-
Prepared EA Accepted for Filing, Soliciting Motions to Intervene and 
Protests, and Soliciting Comments, and Final Terms and Conditions, 
Recommendations, and Prescriptions issued on December 9, 2011, for the 
Allison Creek Hydroelectric Project No. 13124-003 has been extended to 
April 6, 2012.

    Dated: February 24, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4951 Filed 2-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1


SHAMIKA 2 GOLD,INC.
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Shamika 2 Gold, Inc.. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Vivian, President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  Date: May 17, 2011

/s/ Robert VivianName:  Robert VivianTitle:  President and Chief Executive Officer and Interim Financial Officer(Principal Executive and  Accounting Officer)
#### Joe T. BARRERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROSCOE, SNYDER & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 73-3731.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 1974.

Aubrey L. Roberts, Jr., R. Temple Dickson, Sweetwater, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

D. L. Case, Jack Pew, Jr., Dallas, Tex., W. James Rosser, Snyder, Tex., for defendant-appellee.

Before RIVES, GEWIN and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We have given careful consideration to the contentions of the parties as set forth in their well-prepared briefs and further amplified at oral argument. It is our opinion that the district court arrived at the proper conclusion and that the appellant has not presented any valid basis for reversal. Accordingly, the judgment entered for appellee by the district court is affirmed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6752** 

CHAUNCEY LAURENT WALKER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith , District Judge. ( 2:10

- cv - 00548

- RBS

- DEM )

Submitted : September 29, 2011 Decided: October 5, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judge s.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Chauncey Laurent Walker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Chauncey Laurent Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition as untimely . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonab le jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on p rocedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed t he record and conclude that Walker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Walker’s motion for tr anscripts at government expense and his request for the appointment of

counse l. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and3 legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, James S. Quarforth, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2007 of NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
Registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238: 34-47986 Section III-E.];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting and

5. The Registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 2, 2007



/s/ James S. QuarforthJames S. QuarforthChief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of Techprecision Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James
      G. Reindl, the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Mary Desmond, the Chief Financial
      Officer, of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief that:




(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August 16, 2006/s/ James
              G.
              ReindlJames
              G. ReindlChief
              Executive Officer




/s/ Mary
              DesmondMary
              DesmondChief
              Financial Officer