alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1353 

To amend title 1 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 

of 1968 to include nonprofit and volunteer ground and air ambulance 

crew members and first responders for certain benefits. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 25, 2009 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 1 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

Streets Act of 1968 to include nonprofit and volunteer 

ground and air ambulance crew members and first responders for certain benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dale Long Emergency 

5 Medical Service Providers Protection Act’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 1353 IS

1 SEC. 2. BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN NONPROFIT EMERGENCY 

2 MEDICAL SERVICE PROVIDERS. 

3 Section 1204 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control 

4 and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘public em7 ployee member of a rescue squad or ambulance 

8 crew’’ and inserting ‘‘employee or volunteer member 

9 of a rescue squad or ambulance crew (including a 

10 ground or air ambulance service) that— 

11 ‘‘(A) is a public agency; or 

12 ‘‘(B) is (or is a part of) a nonprofit entity 

13 serving the public that is officially authorized or 

14 licensed— 

15 ‘‘(i) to engage in rescue activity or to 

16 provide emergency medical services; and 

17 ‘‘(ii) to respond to an emergency situ18 ation;’’; and 

19 (2) in paragraph (9)— 

20 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘as a 

21 chaplain’’ and all that follows through the semi22 colon, and inserting ‘‘or as a chaplain;’’; 

23 (B) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking 

24 ‘‘or’’ after the semicolon; 

25 (C) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by striking 

26 the period and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•S 1353 IS

1 (D) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(D) a member of a rescue squad or am3 bulance crew who, as authorized or licensed by 

4 law and by the applicable agency or entity, is 

5 engaging in rescue activity or in the provision 

6 of emergency medical services.’’. 

7 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

8 The amendments made by section 2(1) of this Act 

9 shall apply only to injuries sustained on or after January 

10 1, 2009. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000947986
<NAME>                        ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P. Seven


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          4,516,385
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 100,704,816
<ALLOWANCES>                                      177,222
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                      0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                147,879,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                                0
<BONDS>                                       100,650,890
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     45,901,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  147,879,442
<SALES>                                         9,632,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                9,749,244
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,297,147
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  150,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3,652,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,649,580
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        6.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        6.34
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>




</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.75 MB)

Tags:Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Tinian, CNMI, Japan, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, Okinawa, III Marine Expeditionary Force, III MEF, Guam, FEMA, Marine Corps, Marines, 31st MEU, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Saipan, Super Typhoon Yutu, Defense Support of Civil Authorities DSCA

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
J

- A31017

- 16

2017 PA Super 262

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Appellant

v.

ANGEL RIBOT :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1190 EDA 2015

Appeal from the Order March 27, 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 51

- CR

- 0009168

- 2014

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., MOULTON, and FITZGERALD * , JJ.

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY FITZGERALD, J.: FILED AUGUST 15, 2017

I agree with the majority that the best evidence rule does not preclude

the admission of testimony that Appellant was in possession of the buy

money. However, I believe the trial court acted within its discretion when it

credited Appellant’s evidence of a written policy requiring that the buy

money be photocopied over the testimony regarding a change in policy.

Thus, there was an adequate basis for the trial court to find a violation of

departmental policy, which could give rise to a sanction. However, t he

preclusion of all testimony regarding the buy money appears to be a drastic

remedy that is not supported by the circumstances of this case. Thus, I

concur in the result.

____ ________________________________________

* Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Crown Vantage Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and 
changes in equity of Crown Vantage Inc. and subsidiaries, as described in 
Note 2, for the year ended December 31, 1995 which financial statements are 
included on pages 26 through 46 of the 1997 Annual Report to shareholders of 
Crown Vantage Inc. and incorporated by reference herein.  We have also 
audited the financial statement schedule for the period since inception 
through December 31, 1995 listed in the index on page 12 of this Form 10-K.  
These financial statements are the responsibility of the management of Crown 
Vantage Inc.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial 
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. 
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in 
all material respects, the consolidated results of operations and cash flows 
of Crown Vantage Inc. and subsidiaries, as described in Note 2, for the year 
ended December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting 
principles.  In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule 
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial 
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the 
information required to be included therein.

                                       COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Oakland, California
February 23, 1996


                                      23
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Platinum Services, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W91QV1-11-D-0003 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 58382 

Carol L. O'Riordan, Esq. 

Anthony J. Marchese, Esq. 

The O'Riordan Bethel Law Firm, LLP 

Washington, DC 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Lawrence Gilbert, JA 

MAJ Jamal A. Rhinehardt, JA 

Trial Attorneys 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 2 June 2016 

DIANA ~- DICKINSON 

Adminis'trative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58382, Appeal of Platinum Services, 

Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **2012 -**  **0631** Docket Number
**2011 -**  **SW -**  **021 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Eurocopter Al ert Service Bulletin No. AS350 - 05.00.63, Revision 1, dated April 18, 2011 Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin No. AS355 - 05.00.58, Revision 1, dated April 18, 2011


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwes t Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAVIER BAUTISTA

- DELACRUZ,

Petitioner,

v.

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 73564

Agency No. A071

- 594

- 601

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 17, 2018 San Francisco, California

Before: HAWKINS and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and EATON, ** Judge.

Javier Bautista

- Delacruz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration

Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his motion to reopen deportation proceedings as untimely.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for a buse of discretion,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** Richard K. Eaton, Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

NOV 13 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

Cano

- Merida v. INS , 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002), we deny in part and dismiss

in part the petition.

1. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Bautista

- Delacruz’s motion

as untimely because he failed to offer any evidence of country conditions in Mexico

at the time of his initial deportation proceedings. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii). As

a result

, the BIA could not conduct the necessary comparison between evidence

presented on the current motion, and evidence of conditions in existence at the time

of the original hearing. See Salim v. Lynch , 831 F.3d 1133, 1137 (9th Cir. 2016);

Matter of S

- Y

- G

- , 24 I. & N. Dec. 247, 253 (B.I.A. 2007).

2. The BIA determined that Bautista

- Delacruz had not shown an “exceptional

circumstanc e” warranting sua sponte reopening . The BIA’s decision of whether to

exercise its sua sponte authority is not subject to judicial review. See Ekimian v.

INS , 303 F.3d 1153, 1158

– 59 (9th Cir. 2002).

D ENIED in part; DISMISSED in part

.
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS 


         Loss per  common  share of $.20 for the year  ended  June 30,  1997 was
calculated  by dividing net loss of $534,000 for the year ended June 30, 1997 by
the  weighted-average  number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding
of  2,665,277.  Earnings  per common  share of $0.45 for the year ended June 30,
1996 was calculated by dividing  post-conversion net income of $1,102,000 by the
weighted-average  number of common and common equivalent  shares  outstanding of
2,466,832.   For  purposes  of  the   weighted-average   number  of  common  and
common-equivalent shares outstanding,  common stock equivalents consist of stock
options.  The number of shares  purchased by the employee  stock  ownership plan
which  have not been  allocated  or  committed  to be  released  to  participant
accounts are not assumed to be outstanding.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Seven, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of September 30, 2007, and for the periods then ended.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Glade M. Knight    
|Glade M. Knight        
|Chief Executive Officer

November 2, 2007



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Bryan Peery        
|Bryan Peery            
|Chief Financial Officer

November 2, 2007
EXHIBIT 31.1

# CERTIFICATION

I, David H. Roche, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of
Minn Dak Farmers Cooperative;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.    The Companys other certifying officers and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and Rule 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)    disclosed in this report any change in our internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter (fourth fiscal quarter) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    the Companys other certifying officers and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to our auditors and to the audit
committee of our board of directors:

a)    all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
our ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: |                                       | 11-26-04 |  | /s/   David H. Roche | 
|----- | ------------------------------------- | -------- |  | -------------------- | 
|      |                                       |          | 
|      | President and Chief Executive Officer |         

58

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00271-CV

Pedison USA, Inc. and Dickson 

Ewemade

v.

CNC Construction Inc.

§

§

§

§

From the 48th District Court

of Tarrant County (048-263530-13)

November 23, 2016

Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker ______________

 Justice Sue Walker
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1368 

To amend title 35, United States Code, to create an exception from infringement of design patents for certain component parts used to repair another article of manufacture. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 25, 2009 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 35, United States Code, to create an exception from infringement of design patents for certain component parts used to repair another article of manufacture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Access to Repair Parts 

5 Act’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 1368 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION FROM INFRINGEMENT FOR CERTAIN 

2 COMPONENT PARTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 271 of title 35, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(j) It shall not be an act of infringement of any de7 sign patent to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the 

8 United States or import into the United States any article 

9 of manufacture that itself constitutes a component part 

10 of another article of manufacture, if the sole purpose of 

11 the component part is for the repair of the article of man12 ufacture of which it is a part so as to restore its original 

13 appearance.’’. 

14 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub15 section (a) applies to acts done on or after the date of 

16 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****As Adopted Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Borland Software Corporation (the “Company”)for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), Tod Nielsen, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition of the Company at the endof the period covered by the Report and results of operations of theCompany for the period covered by the Report.        /s/ Tod Nielsen   Tod NielsenChief Executive Officer