`UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549

                                    --------

                                    FORM 10-K/A


|X| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005

                                       OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________ to ___________

Commission file number:  0-27378


                                   NUCO2 INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

            Florida                                            65-0180800
--------------------------------                            --------------------
(State or Other Jurisdiction of                             (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)                               Identification No.)

2800 S.E. Market Place, Stuart, Florida                           34997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                        (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (772) 221-1754

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

                                      None.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

                          common stock, $.001 par value
                          -----------------------------
                                (Title of Class)

            Indicate  by check mark  whether the  Registrant:  (1) has filed all
reports  required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter  period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No [ ]

            Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent  filers  pursuant
to  Item  405 of  Regulation  S-K is  not  contained  herein,  and  will  not be
contained,  to the  best of  Registrant's  knowledge,  in  definitive  proxy  or
information  statements  incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

                                                           (CONTINUED NEXT PAGE)






            Indicate by check mark  whether  the  Registrant  is an  accelerated
filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes |X| No [ ]

            Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No |X|

            The  aggregate  market  value at December  31, 2004 of shares of the
Registrant's  common  stock,  $.001 par value per share  (based upon the closing
price of $22.19 per share of such stock on the  Nasdaq  National  Market on such
date), held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately  $275,862,000.
Solely for the  purposes  of this  calculation,  shares  held by  directors  and
executive  officers of the Registrant have been excluded.  Such exclusion should
not be  deemed a  determination  or an  admission  by the  Registrant  that such
individuals are, in fact, affiliates of the Registrant.

            At September 10, 2005, there were outstanding  15,313,568  shares of
the Registrant's common stock, $.001 par value.

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

            The information  required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III
is incorporated by reference to the  Registrant's  definitive proxy statement to
be filed not later than October 28, 2005 pursuant to Regulation 14A.



                                EXPLANATORY NOTE

            On September  13, 2005,  the filing date of Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2005 (the "10-K") of NuC02 Inc. (the "Company"), the Company
believed that separate  presentation of noncurrent  deferred tax assets of $39.3
million  and the  noncurrent  deferred  tax  liability  of $24.2  million in the
balance  sheet as of June 30, 2005 was  appropriate.  Prior to the filing of the
Company's  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September  30, 2005 (the  "September
10-Q"),  the Company  determined  that in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting  Standards No. 109,  "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS 109"),  all
noncurrent deferred tax assets and liabilities should be offset and presented as
a single amount in the balance sheet,  and  accordingly,  in the September 10-Q,
noncurrent  deferred tax assets and the  noncurrent  deferred tax  liability are
presented as a single amount in the balance sheet as of both  September 30, 2005
and June 30, 2005.  The Company's  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  December 31,
2005 also presents  noncurrent  deferred tax assets and the noncurrent  deferred
tax  liability as a single  amount in the balance  sheet as of both December 31,
2005 and June 30, 2005.

            The  purpose  of  this  Amendment  to  the  10-K  is to  offset  the
noncurrent  deferred tax  liability  against  noncurrent  deferred tax assets in
accordance with SFAS 109, and to present noncurrent deferred tax assets, net, of
$15.1 million and $0  noncurrent  deferred tax liability in the balance sheet as
of June 30, 2005.

            This Amendment revises pages 17, F-2, F-4 and F-28 of the 10-K.




                                   NUCO2 INC.

                                      Index
                                      -----
                                                                            Page
                                                                            ----

PART I.
Item 1.        Business.                                                       1
Item 2.        Properties.                                                    15
Item 3.        Legal Proceedings.                                             15
Item 4.        Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.           15

PART II.
Item 5.        Market For Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder
               Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.             15
Item 6.        Selected Financial Data.                                       17
Item 7.        Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
               and Results of Operations.                                     18
Item 7A.       Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.    36
Item 8         Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.                   36
Item 9.        Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on
               Accounting and Financial Disclosure.                           36
Item 9A.       Controls and Procedures.                                       36
Item 9B.       Other Information.                                             37

PART III.
Item 10.       Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.            37
Item 11.       Executive Compensation.                                        37
Item 12.       Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
               Management and Related Stockholder Matters.                    37
Item 13.       Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.                37
Item 14.       Principal Accountant Fees and Services.                        37

PART IV.
Item 15.       Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.                    37

Signatures                                                                    40
Index to Financial Statements                                                F-1




            THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, INCLUDING "MANAGEMENT'S  DISCUSSION
AND  ANALYSIS  OF  FINANCIAL  CONDITION  AND  RESULTS OF  OPERATIONS,"  CONTAINS
FORWARD-LOOKING  STATEMENTS  REGARDING FUTURE EVENTS AND OUR FUTURE RESULTS THAT
ARE BASED ON CURRENT EXPECTATIONS,  ESTIMATES,  FORECASTS, AND PROJECTIONS ABOUT
THE  INDUSTRY  IN  WHICH WE  OPERATE  AND THE  BELIEFS  AND  ASSUMPTIONS  OF OUR
MANAGEMENT.   WORDS  SUCH  AS  "EXPECTS,"   "ANTICIPATES,"  "TARGETS,"  "GOALS,"
"PROJECTS," "INTENDS," "PLANS," "BELIEVES," "SEEKS," "ESTIMATES,"  VARIATIONS OF
SUCH   WORDS,   AND  SIMILAR   EXPRESSIONS   ARE   INTENDED  TO  IDENTIFY   SUCH
FORWARD-LOOKING   STATEMENTS.   IN  ADDITION,   ANY  STATEMENTS  THAT  REFER  TO
PROJECTIONS OF OUR FUTURE  FINANCIAL  PERFORMANCE,  OUR  ANTICIPATED  GROWTH AND
TRENDS  IN OUR  BUSINESS,  AND  OTHER  CHARACTERIZATIONS  OF  FUTURE  EVENTS  OR
CIRCUMSTANCES,  ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. READERS ARE CAUTIONED THAT THESE
FORWARD-LOOKING  STATEMENTS  ARE ONLY  PREDICTIONS  AND ARE  SUBJECT  TO  RISKS,
UNCERTAINTIES,  AND ASSUMPTIONS THAT ARE DIFFICULT TO PREDICT. THEREFORE, ACTUAL
RESULTS  MAY  DIFFER  MATERIALLY  AND  ADVERSELY  FROM  THOSE  EXPRESSED  IN ANY
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.  READERS ARE REFERRED TO THE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
IDENTIFIED  BELOW,  UNDER  "RISK  FACTORS,"  AND  ELSEWHERE.   WE  UNDERTAKE  NO
OBLIGATION TO REVISE OR UPDATE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS FOR ANY REASON.

1.          BUSINESS.

GENERAL

            We believe we are the leading  provider of bulk CO2 systems and bulk
CO2 for carbonating  fountain beverages in the United States based on the number
of bulk CO2 systems  leased to customers and the only company in our industry to
operate  a  national  network  of bulk  CO2  service  locations.  We  provide  a
comprehensive  range of services,  including  bulk CO2 system  installation  and
maintenance,  bulk CO2 delivery and dedicated  in-house  technical  support on a
nationwide basis. We are the only national provider of beverage-grade  bulk CO2,
a premium  grade  CO2,  which is  increasingly  required  by our  customers  for
carbonating  fountain  beverages.  Many of our customers are major  national and
regional restaurant and convenience store chains, movie theater operators, theme
parks,  resorts and sports venues,  including  McDonald's,  Burger King, Subway,
Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, 7-Eleven, Loews Cineplex, Six Flags, Walt Disney World and
Madison Square Garden.

            Bulk CO2  systems  store CO2 in liquid  form and  convert the liquid
product to gaseous CO2 on demand.  Gaseous CO2 is the necessary  ingredient  for
beverage  carbonation,  which is a critical component of our customers' fountain
beverage  product.  We install bulk CO2 systems at the customer's  site,  refill
them on a regular basis and perform  periodic  maintenance to provide a constant
supply of bulk CO2 with consistent quality. Prior to the commercial introduction
of bulk CO2 systems in 1986, high pressure cylinders were the primary method for
carbonating  fountain beverages.  High pressure cylinders containing gaseous CO2
can weigh up to 155  pounds,  require  specialized  handling  skills and must be
returned to the supplier when empty,  although they may be less  expensive  than
bulk CO2 systems for low volume users of CO2. Bulk CO2 systems  typically  store
sufficient  CO2 to replace at least 10 high pressure  cylinders,  and have clear
advantages over high pressure cylinders, including:

    o       consistent and improved beverage quality;
    o       increased product yields;
    o       no cylinder handling or storage requirements;
    o       elimination  of downtime  and  product  waste  during high  pressure
            cylinder changeovers; and
    o       enhanced safety for both the supplier and the customer.

            Today,  the  majority of our growth is driven by the  conversion  of
high  pressure  cylinder  users  to bulk CO2  systems.  Our  ability  to grow is
dependent on the success of our  marketing  efforts to acquire new customers and
their  acceptance  of bulk  CO2  systems  as a  replacement  for  high  pressure
cylinders.

            Since our  incorporation  in Florida in 1990,  we have  expanded our
service  area from one  service  location  and 19  customers  in  Florida to 117
service  locations  supporting  approximately  99,000  customer  locations in 45
states as of June 30, 2005.  Since our initial public offering in December 1995,
this growth has been achieved,  in large part,  with the proceeds of our initial
public offering of common stock as well as a secondary  offering of common stock
in June 1996,  borrowings  under our senior credit  facilities,  the issuance in
1997  and  1999  of our  12%  senior  subordinated  notes  due  2004  and  2005,
respectively  (prepaid in August  2003),  the sale of our Series A 8% Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock in May 2000 (converted into 754,982 shares of common
stock in August 2004) and Series B 8% Cumulative  Convertible Preferred Stock in
November 2001  (converted into 247,420 shares of common stock in December 2004),
the private placement of our common stock in August 2002, the issuance in August
2003 of our 16.3% senior subordinated notes due 2009 (prepaid in April 2005) and
the proceeds of a secondary offering of our common stock in March 2005.

                                       1



            Our  website  is  www.nuco2.com.  Through  a link  on  our  Investor
Relations  section of our website,  we make  available the following  filings as
soon as  reasonably  practicable  after  they are  electronically  filed with or
furnished to the U.S.  Securities and Exchange  Commission  ("SEC"):  our Annual
Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K
and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934. All such filings are available
free of charge.

BUSINESS STRATEGY

            Our business and strategic  plan focuses on the continued  growth of
our bulk  CO2  business  due to  conversion  of high  pressure  cylinder  users,
increased  penetration  of the existing bulk CO2 market and growth in the United
States fountain beverage market.

            ACCELERATE  PENETRATION AND EXPANSION OF CUSTOMER  ACCOUNTS  THROUGH
MASTER SERVICE  AGREEMENTS.  We have entered into 34 master  service  agreements
which include 31 of the 100 largest restaurant and convenience store chains that
serve fountain beverages.  We currently service  approximately  37,000 chain and
franchisee locations with chains that have signed master service agreements.  In
addition, we are the only supplier of bulk CO2 capable of offering comprehensive
master  service  agreements due to our  established  national  distribution  and
service  network.  By  negotiating  terms with the  customer  on a  national  or
regional  level,  we are generally able to offer a customer's  franchisees  more
favorable  terms than they could achieve on their own, with the added benefit of
avoiding the expense and time spent  negotiating  contract terms and testing our
capabilities.

            MAINTAIN  FOCUS ON FOUNTAIN  BEVERAGE  BULK CO2  MARKET.  We believe
there is  significant  potential  for  growth  in our  business  as a result  of
continued conversion from high pressure cylinders, competitive share capture and
organic growth in the fountain beverage market.  The sale of fountain  beverages
is a business not subject to significant  fluctuations,  which has  historically
experienced  stable growth.  We have focused our marketing  efforts on educating
fountain  beverage  providers about the improved  safety,  quality and potential
cost  benefits  of bulk  CO2  systems.  By  operating  exclusively  in bulk  CO2
distribution,  we are better equipped to focus our resources,  minimize overhead
costs and maintain high levels of customer support and service.  As a result, we
believe we have  significant  opportunity  to grow our  business  by  increasing
market share in an expanding market.

            INCREASE DENSITY AT EXISTING OPERATIONS TO IMPROVE PROFITABILITY. We
maintain a highly  efficient  route structure and establish  additional  service
locations as service areas expand through  geographic growth. Our strategy is to
increase the density of our customer base for our existing service  locations in
order to lower  the  average  time and  distance  between  stops  and  allow for
increased  absorption  of  fixed  costs.  For the  year  ended  June  30,  2005,
approximately 75% of our service locations operated at over 50% gross margin.

            SELECTIVELY PURSUE CUSTOMER ACCOUNT ACQUISITION  OPPORTUNITIES WHILE
MAINTAINING  HIGH LEVELS OF SERVICE.  The  fountain  beverage  CO2  distribution
market is fragmented, which provides numerous opportunities for continued growth
in our business through selective customer account acquisitions. Our competitors
range from small,  local companies in the fountain  beverage  industry to larger
companies  that  generally  consider  bulk CO2 a  non-core  business.  It may be
increasingly   difficult   for   our   competitors   to   match   the   breadth,
cost-effectiveness and quality of our nationwide services and therefore they may
be motivated to consider alternatives to continued participation in the fountain
beverage CO2  distribution  industry.  For example,  in Fiscal 2005, we acquired
Pain  Enterprises' bulk CO2 beverage  carbonation  business and certain beverage
carbonation  assets of  Coca-Cola  Enterprises,  Inc.,  and we will  continue to
selectively evaluate customer account acquisitions that will expand our customer
base and increase our existing route density.  In addition,  we believe that our
superior  nationwide  customer  service  capabilities  enable us to attract  and
retain customers. We intend to continue our disciplined approach to growth while
maintaining our high level of service.

OPERATIONS

            We offer our customers two principal services:

    o       we lease, install and maintain stationery bulk CO2 systems; and

    o       we routinely refill bulk CO2 systems with beverage-grade bulk CO2.

                                       2



            We generally provide these services through  long-term  contracts of
five to six years in duration.  The  following  table  provides a summary of our
service plans, which are tailored to individual customers' needs:

                                      % of Fiscal
                                     2005 Service
                                        Plan
       Service Plan                    Revenue               Description
       ------------                    -------               -----------

Budget Plan                             69%          Customer    pays   a   flat
                                                     monthly  fee for  bulk  CO2
                                                     system rental and bulk CO2

Equipment Lease and Product             19%          Customer   rents  bulk  CO2
Purchase Plan                                        system and pays a per pound
                                                     rate for bulk CO2

Fill Plan                               12%          Customer   owns   bulk  CO2
                                                     system and pays a per pound
                                                     rate for bulk CO2

            Budget Plan  customers  pay a flat  monthly fee for the lease of our
bulk CO2 system  installed  on the  customer's  premises and refills of bulk CO2
according to a predetermined  schedule.  The bulk CO2 is included in the monthly
rental charge up to a predetermined maximum annual volume cap. If the annual cap
is exceeded,  the customer is charged for additional bulk CO2 delivered on a per
pound basis.  Customers under the Equipment Lease and Product Purchase Plan also
lease  from us a bulk CO2  system,  but the  customer  is charged on a per pound
basis for all bulk CO2  delivered.  Fill Plan  customers  own their own bulk CO2
system and purchase  bulk CO2 on a per pound basis from us. We seek to negotiate
six-year  supply  contracts  even  with  customers  that own  their own bulk CO2
systems. We believe that the use of long-term service plans provides benefits to
both our  customers and us.  Customers are able to largely  eliminate CO2 supply
interruptions  and the need to  operate  CO2  equipment  themselves,  while  the
long-term  nature of the service plan adds stability to our revenue base.  After
the expiration of the initial term of service plan,  the plan  generally  renews
automatically or a new service plan is agreed upon.

            At June 30, 2005, we operated 117 service  locations (103 stationary
and 14  mobile)  located  in 42  states  along  with a  dedicated  fleet  of 203
specialized bulk CO2 delivery vehicles and 92 technical  service vehicles.  Each
stationary  service  location is equipped  with a storage tank (up to 40 tons in
size) which receives bulk CO2 from large  capacity  tanker trucks and from which
our specialized bulk CO2 delivery vehicles are filled with bulk CO2 for delivery
to customers.

            Upon activation of a customer  account,  our technicians  design the
customer's bulk CO2 system and install the bulk CO2 tank and piping systems.  In
most instances,  the bulk CO2 system at a customer's site is accessible from the
outside of the customer's  establishment and delivery of bulk CO2 does not cause
any interference with the operations of the customer.  We place a locking device
on the bulk CO2 fill port to reduce the  likelihood  of tampering and to prevent
customers from using  alternative  sources of bulk CO2 while under contract with
us.

            We  maintain  a  highly  efficient   delivery  route  structure  and
establish  additional  stationary  bulk CO2 service  locations as service  areas
expand  through  geographic  growth.  Our  goal  is to have a  service  location
centrally  located  within 75 miles of each customer  serviced from that service
location. As we increase route density by lowering the average time and distance
traveled between stops, we lower the average cost per delivery.  Currently,  our
bulk CO2  delivery  vehicles  are each  servicing  an  average  of 450  customer
locations.  We believe that optimal  route density is achieved when our bulk CO2
delivery vehicles are each servicing 500 customer locations.  Collectively,  our
delivery vehicles make more than 3,500 deliveries per day.

            We have developed an automated  scheduling system to achieve maximum
route optimization. In order to ensure reliability and consistent service levels
to the customer,  CO2 deliveries are made at fixed  intervals.  Information from
our proprietary AccuRoute(R) system is used to determine the proper frequency of
deliveries.  Each account is placed into the correct frequency grouping based on
delivery history, seasonality and promotions reported to us by the customer. The
scheduling  system  analyzes a customer's  CO2 usage (as measured by flow meters
installed on our  specialized  bulk CO2 delivery  vehicles) and  determines  the
optimal  next  delivery  date,  considering  both maximum  payload  delivery and
remaining  bulk CO2 stock held in the  customer's  tank.  The  foundation of our
scheduling system is the delivery  information  gathered by the portable account
link,  or PAL,  system.  The PAL system  utilizes a hand-held  device to provide
field personnel with up to date delivery route and customer account  information
and  also  serves  as  an  input  source  to  record  all  delivery  transaction
information.  The scheduling system utilizes  sophisticated  computer algorithms
that consider:

                                       3



       o    Tank size;
       o    Delivery history;
       o    Seasonal factors; and
       o    Safety margins.

            Based on  delivered  quantities  over time,  the  scheduling  system
determines  a daily  usage  rate.  CO2 usage,  combined  with tank size and last
delivery date, is used to determine how often a customer's  tank must be filled.
Accounts are closely monitored by our field and corporate personnel.

            Our customer  service and support  complements  our bulk CO2 systems
installation and bulk CO2 deliveries.  Our bulk CO2 route drivers are trained to
fix minor technical  problems with the bulk CO2 systems and to educate customers
as to how the bulk CO2 systems  work. We operate a 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
customer  service call center.  Our in-house  customer  service  representatives
provide  access  to  experienced  technical  personnel  who are  able to  answer
customer queries,  identify problems and dispatch service personnel as required.
In addition,  our in-house  technical  expertise in maintaining and refurbishing
tanks adds to our  knowledge and  understanding  of the bulk CO2 systems that we
offer.  As a result of this expertise,  we have a sufficient  supply of bulk CO2
tanks readily  available for our customers' use and are able to minimize service
interruptions and downtime for CO2 tank maintenance.

CUSTOMERS

            Among our  customers  are many of the major  national  and  regional
restaurant and convenience  store chains (based on U.S.  systemwide  foodservice
sales),  movie  theater  operators,  theme  parks,  resorts  and sports  venues,
including:

             QUICK SERVE RESTAURANTS                               CASUAL/DINNER HOUSES
Arby's                         McDonald's                Applebee's                   On the Border
Boston Market                  Panera Bread Company      Bahama Breeze                Outback Steakhouse
Bumpers Drive-In               Papa Gino's               Bertucci's                   Perkins Family Restaurants
Burger King                    Pizza Hut                 Cheesecake Factory           Pizzeria Uno
Captain D's                    Pizza Inn                 Chevy's                      Ponderosa Steak House
Carl's Jr.                     Quizno's Classic Subs     Chili's                      Red Lobster/Olive Garden
Checker's Drive-In             Rubios                    Corner Bakery                Roadhouse Grill
Chick-Fil-A                    Sbarro                    Don Pablo's                  Rockfish
Chipotle Grill                 Schlotzsky's Deli         Friendly's Restaurant        Romano's Macaroni Grill
Church's Chicken               Sonic Drive-In            Hard Rock Cafe               Ruby Tuesday
D'Angelo's Sandwich Shop       Steak'n Shake             Hooters                      Ryan's Family Steak House
Dunkin' Donuts                 Subway                    Landry's                     Shoney's
El Pollo Loco                  Taco Bell                 Longhorn Steakhouse          Spaghetti Warehouse
Hardee's                       Wendy's                   Maggiano's Little Italy
KFC                            White Castle
Krystal                                                             CONVENIENCE/PETROLEUM
                                                         7-Eleven                     Golden Pantry
CONTRACT FEEDERS               WHOLESALE CLUBS           AM/PM                        Phillips 66
ARAmark                        BJ's Wholesale            BP/Amoco                     Pilot Travel
Compass Group                  Costco                    Circle K                     Racetrac Petroleum
Fine Host                      Sam's Club                Coastal Market               Shell ETD
Host Marriott                                            Conoco                       Spectrum Stores
Sodexho Operations                                       Cumberland Farms             Thornton Oil
                                                         Exxon                        Tom Thumb
                     SPORTS VENUES                                       MOVIE THEATRES
AMF Bowling Centers            Madison Square Garden     Carmike Cinemas              Regal Entertainment
Brunswick Recreation Centers   Pro Player Stadium        Loews Cineplex               Wallace Theatres
Derby Lane                     Raymond James Stadium
Georgia Dome                   Staples Center                            THEME/AMUSEMENT
                                                         Six Flags                    Wet `n' Wild
                                                         Universal Studios Florida    White Waters
                                                         Walt Disney World

                                       4



MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENTS

            We have entered into 34 master service  agreements  which include 31
of the largest 100 restaurant and  convenience  store chains that serve fountain
beverages.  We  currently  service  approximately  37,000  chain and  franchisee
locations with chains that have signed existing master service agreements. These
master service agreements  generally provide for a commitment on the part of the
operator for all of its currently  owned  locations and may also include  future
locations.  We are actively  working on expanding  the number of master  service
agreements  with  numerous  restaurant  chains,  including  some of the  largest
operators.

COMPETITION

            We  believe  that our  ability  to  compete  depends  on a number of
factors,  including product quality,  availability and reliability,  price, name
recognition,  delivery time and service and support.  Despite the customer-level
advantages of bulk CO2 systems over high pressure cylinders,  we generally price
our services comparably to the price of high pressure cylinders. This has proved
an  effective  inducement  to cause  customers  to  convert  from high  pressure
cylinders to bulk CO2  systems.  We believe  that we enjoy  advantages  over our
competitors due to our hub and spoke delivery system,  overall route density and
lower average time and distance  traveled between stops. Our toll-free  customer
support  help line is  clearly  marked on each bulk CO2 system we  service.  The
experience  level of our support  personnel  aids in the resolution of equipment
failures or other service  interruptions,  regardless  of whether  caused by our
equipment.

            Major restaurant and convenience store chains continue to adopt bulk
CO2 systems and search for  qualified  suppliers to install and service bulk CO2
systems.  We are  the  only  bulk  CO2  provider  with  nationwide  service  and
distribution  capabilities and we believe that other qualified suppliers of bulk
CO2 systems and  services do not  presently  exist in many regions of the United
States.  Unlike many of our competitors for whom bulk CO2 is a secondary service
line, we have no material  lines of business at present other than the provision
of bulk CO2 services.  All aspects of our  operations are guided by our focus on
the bulk CO2  business,  including  our  selection  of operating  equipment  and
technical personnel,  design of delivery routes,  location of service locations,
structure  of customer  contracts,  content of employee  training  programs  and
design of management  information  and accounting  systems.  By restricting  the
scope of our  activities to bulk CO2 business and largely  avoiding the dilution
of management  time and resources that would be required by other service lines,
we believe  that we are able to maximize  the level of service we provide to our
bulk CO2 customers.

            Many  types of  businesses  compete  in the  fountain  beverage  CO2
business and market share is  fragmented.  High pressure  cylinders and bulk CO2
services are most frequently provided by distributors of industrial gases. These
companies generally provide a number of products and services in addition to CO2
and often view bulk CO2 systems as high-service adjuncts to their core business.
Industrial gas distributors  generally have been reluctant to attempt to convert
their high pressure  cylinder  customers to bulk CO2 systems for several reasons
including  the capital  outlays  required  to purchase  bulk CO2 systems and the
idling of existing  high  pressure  cylinders and  associated  equipment.  Other
competitors  in the  fountain  beverage  CO2 business  include  fountain  supply
companies and  distributors  of restaurant  supplies and  groceries,  which vary
greatly in size.  There are also a number of small  companies  that provide bulk
CO2 services that operate on a local or regional geographic scope. While many of
these  suppliers  lack the  capital  necessary  to offer  bulk  CO2  systems  to
customers on lease,  suppliers  vary widely in size and some of our  competitors
may have significantly greater financial,  technical or marketing resources than
we do.

                                       5



COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS

            Our  competitive  strengths  position us to benefit  from  continued
growth in bulk CO2 usage.

            MARKET LEADERSHIP IN A GROWING MARKET. We believe we are the leading
provider  of bulk  CO2  systems  and  beverage-grade  bulk  CO2 to the  fountain
beverage market, with an estimated market share of approximately 60%. Our market
leadership  and  nationwide  service  and  distribution   capabilities  uniquely
position us to benefit from the  conversion of high  pressure  cylinders to bulk
CO2 systems.  This  conversion is primarily  driven by the numerous  benefits of
bulk CO2 systems as  compared  to high  pressure  cylinders.  We  estimate  that
approximately 600,000 of the approximately  900,000 food service  establishments
in the United States use fountain beverage carbonation systems. Of these 600,000
fountain beverage users, we estimate that approximately  440,000,  or 73% of the
market,  currently use high pressure  cylinders and represent  potential organic
growth targets.

            SOLE  NATIONAL  PROVIDER  OF BULK  CO2.  We are the  only  bulk  CO2
provider with nationwide service and distribution  capabilities,  enabling us to
establish  service  agreements  with  multi-location  customers  such  as  major
national and regional  restaurant and convenience store chains and movie theater
operators. Increasingly, these customers seek providers who can offer consistent
product  quality,  high  levels of local  service and  centralized  support on a
nationwide  basis.  As the only bulk CO2 provider  with these  capabilities,  we
expect  to  achieve  increasing  market  share  and  growth  that  outpaces  our
competition.  In addition,  our national service and  distribution  capabilities
have enabled us to negotiate master service  agreements with many restaurant and
convenience store chains as well as agreements with franchisees who own multiple
locations. These master service agreements generally provide for a commitment on
the part of the customer for all of its currently  owned  locations and may also
include future locations.

            UNIQUE   AND   COMPREHENSIVE   SERVICE   PLATFORM.   We   provide  a
comprehensive   range  of  services   nationwide,   including  bulk  CO2  system
installation and maintenance, bulk CO2 delivery and dedicated in-house technical
support.  We believe  our  responsiveness  and the  breadth  and  quality of our
service  offerings  differentiate  us from our  competition,  and  influence our
customers'  decision  to choose and  continue  using our  services.  Our service
platform enables us to offer our customers a "one-stop-shop"  for their bulk CO2
needs:

      o     We  supply  and  install  a  complete  range  of  bulk  CO2  systems
            customized   to  meet  the   specific   needs   of  our   customers.
            Complementing  this service is our in-house  technical  expertise in
            maintaining  and  refurbishing  bulk CO2 tanks.  As a result of this
            expertise,  we have a  sufficient  supply of bulk CO2 tanks  readily
            available for our  customers'  use and are able to minimize  service
            interruptions and downtime for bulk CO2 tank maintenance.

      o     We provide bulk CO2 delivery utilizing our AccuRoute(R) distribution
            system,   which  relies  on  computer   algorithms  to  analyze  our
            proprietary  database of usage history,  tank size,  seasonality and
            customer promotions for each of our individual accounts to determine
            the  optimal   bulk  CO2   delivery   schedule.   Our   AccuRoute(R)
            distribution system minimizes service interruptions and the need for
            customers to schedule bulk CO2 deliveries.

      o     We operate a 24 hours a day,  7 days a week  customer  service  call
            center. Our in-house customer service representatives provide access
            to experienced  technical  personnel who are able to answer customer
            queries,   identify  problems  and  dispatch  service  personnel  as
            required.

      o     As of June 30, 2005,  we had a fleet of 295  delivery and  technical
            service  vehicles  operated  by 332 drivers  and 94  technicians  to
            maintain  our  installed  base of bulk CO2  systems  and  respond to
            service calls allowing us to provide on-site service to any customer
            generally   within   a   matter   of   hours,   minimizing   service
            interruptions.  As carbonated  fountain beverages represent a highly
            profitable product for our customers, our ability to respond quickly
            can minimize costly downtime due to lack of carbonation.

            SCALABLE BUSINESS MODEL WITH OPERATING LEVERAGE. We have established
a network of service  locations which allows us to service  virtually all of the
fountain  beverage  providers in the continental  United States. We can leverage
our network and operating efficiencies to service incremental customer locations
with minimal incremental investment.  We are able to expand our base of customer
locations without  significantly  increasing our distribution  network,  thereby
increasing our profitability and cash flow.

                                       6



            HIGHLY  VISIBLE  REVENUE  STREAM  SUPPORTED  BY STRONG  BACKLOG  AND
LONG-TERM CUSTOMER  CONTRACTS.  As of June 30, 2005, we had a signed contractual
backlog of approximately  5,300 new customer accounts awaiting  activation.  Our
contracts are typically five to six years in duration,  providing  stability and
visibility to our revenue base. We have established long-term relationships with
our customers' organizations and have experienced strong renewal rates under our
existing contracts,  with customer cancellations in fiscal 2005 of less than 2%.
In fiscal 2005, total customer  attrition was less than 5%. In addition,  we are
not overly  dependent  on the business of any one  customer.  For the year ended
June 30, 2005, no single customer accounted for more than 4% of our revenues.

            LONG-STANDING   RELATIONSHIPS  WITH  BLUE-CHIP  SUPPLIERS.  We  have
long-standing  relationships  with  our  suppliers  who  are  leaders  in  their
respective  industries  including,  The BOC Group,  Inc. which supplies our bulk
CO2;  Ryder System Inc.,  from whom we lease our  delivery  vehicles;  and Chart
Industries,  Inc. and Harsco  Corporation,  which provide our bulk CO2 tanks. As
one of the  largest  purchasers  of  both  bulk  CO2  and  bulk  CO2  tanks  for
carbonating  fountain  beverages,  we believe we are able to negotiate long-term
agreements  with  our  suppliers  at  favorable  terms  and to  secure  priority
delivery.

            STRONG  OPERATING CASH FLOW.  Since 2000, we have maintained  EBITDA
(earnings before interest,  taxes,  depreciation  and  amortization)  margins in
excess of 25% on average while  generating cash from  operations  totaling $90.0
million.  We have  invested  this cash in the future  growth of our  business by
purchasing  bulk CO2 tanks and  equipment  and  expanding our network of service
locations.  Since 2000, our investments have enabled us to increase our customer
locations served by 35.6%, to approximately  99,000 accounts currently.  We plan
to use the increased cash generated by our improving  profitability to invest in
the future  growth of our business  both through  direct  investment  in revenue
generating  equipment and  acquisitions,  and through debt repayment to increase
our balance sheet flexibility.

SALES AND MARKETING

            Our bulk CO2  systems and  services  are sold by a sales force of 49
commission  only  independent  sales   representatives  and  29  salaried  sales
personnel.  We market our bulk CO2 systems and services to large  customers such
as restaurant  and  convenience  store chains,  movie theater  operators,  theme
parks,  resorts  and sports  venues.  Our  customers  include  many of the major
national and regional  chains  throughout the United  States.  We approach large
chains on a corporate  or regional  level for  approval to become the  exclusive
supplier  of bulk CO2  systems  and  services  on a  national  basis or within a
designated territory. We then direct our sales efforts to the managers or owners
of the individual or franchised  operating units. Our  relationships  with chain
customers in one geographic  market frequently help us to establish service with
these same chains  when we expand  into new  markets.  After  obtaining  service
relationships  for a chains'  locations  in a new market,  we attempt to rapidly
build route density by targeting independent restaurants, convenience stores and
theaters for bulk CO2 system conversion and/or service.

BACKLOG

            As of June 30, 2004 and 2005, we had a signed contractual backlog of
approximately  3,900 and 5,300 new  service  locations,  respectively,  awaiting
activation.  New activations  are dependent upon a number of factors,  including
the expiration of any existing agreements the customer may have with its current
CO2 supplier.

BULK CO2 SUPPLY

            Bulk CO2 is currently a readily available  commodity product,  which
is  processed  and sold by various  sources.  In May 1997,  we  entered  into an
exclusive  bulk CO2  requirements  contract  with  The BOC  Group,  Inc.,  which
currently expires in May 2011, for 100% of our bulk CO2 requirements. Under this
contract, BOC, a multinational industrial gases company, is committed to provide
us with a  stable  supply  of  beverage  grade  CO2 at  competitive  prices.  In
addition,  the  agreement  provides  that if  sufficient  quantities of bulk CO2
become  unavailable  for any reason,  we will  receive  treatment as a preferred
customer. For example, in the event of a CO2 shortage, many CO2 suppliers reduce
deliveries of CO2 to all customers. Our agreement with BOC provides that we will
continue  to receive  CO2  deliveries  in full,  along with  BOC's  other  large
customers, prior to deliveries to other customers.

            Our agreement  with BOC also requires that BOC certify the purity of
CO2 they supply to us. Our bulk CO2 service  locations and our delivery vehicles
are used solely for storage and transport of beverage-grade  CO2 to minimize any
possibility  of  contamination.  This supply system enables us to provide to our
customers  beverage-grade CO2 that has a known composition and is traceable from
the point of  production  to the point of use,  a  service  that many  customers
value.

                                       7



BULK CO2 SYSTEMS

            We purchase  new bulk CO2 systems  from the two major  manufacturers
and we believe that we are the largest  purchaser of bulk CO2 systems from these
manufacturers  combined.  We currently  purchase bulk CO2 systems in three sizes
(300,  450 or 600  lbs.  of bulk CO2  capacity)  depending  on the  needs of our
customers.  Bulk CO2 systems are vacuum insulated containers with extremely high
insulation  characteristics  allowing the storage of CO2, in its liquid form, at
very low  temperatures.  Our bulk CO2 systems  operate under low  pressure,  are
fully  automatic,   and  require  no  electricity.   Based  upon  manufacturers'
estimates, the service life of a bulk CO2 system is expected to exceed 20 years.
We also refurbish bulk CO2 tanks at our Stuart, Florida facility. We maintain an
adequate inventory of bulk CO2 systems to meet expected customer demand.

EMPLOYEES

            At June 30, 2005, we employed 613 full-time  employees,  187 of whom
were involved in management,  sales or customer support,  332 of whom were route
drivers  and 94 of  whom  were  in  technical  service  functions.  None  of our
employees is subject to a collective bargaining agreement; however, employees in
Chicago, Illinois and Hampshire, Illinois have elected union representation.  We
consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

TRADEMARKS

            We  market  our  services   using  the  NuCO2(R)  and   AccuRoute(R)
trademarks  which have been  registered by us with the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office. The current  registrations for these trademarks expire in 2007 and 2013,
respectively.

SEASONALITY

            CO2 usage is subject to seasonal  variations.  CO2 usage  fluctuates
based on factors  such as weather and  traditional  summer and holiday  periods.
Demand  for CO2 in times of cold or  inclement  weather  is lower  than at other
times. Based on historical data and expected trends, we anticipate that revenues
from the delivery of CO2 will be highest in our first  quarter and lowest in our
third quarter.

REGULATORY MATTERS

            Our business is subject to various federal, state and local laws and
regulations  adopted for the use,  storage and handling of hazardous  materials,
the  protection of the  environment,  the health and safety of our employees and
users of our products and services. The transportation of bulk CO2 is subject to
regulation  by various  federal,  state and local  agencies,  including the U.S.
Department of  Transportation.  Regulatory  authorities have broad powers and we
are subject to regulatory and legislative  changes that can affect the economics
of our industry by requiring  changes in operating  practices or by  influencing
the demand for and the costs of  providing  services.  We believe that we are in
compliance  in all  material  respects  with  all  such  laws,  regulations  and
standards  currently in effect and that the cost of  compliance  with such laws,
regulations and standards has not and is not anticipated to materially adversely
affect us.

                                  RISK FACTORS

            Set forth below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and
in other documents we file with the SEC are risks and  uncertainties  that could
cause actual results to differ  materially from the results  contemplated by the
forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

OUR  INABILITY  TO MANAGE OUR GROWTH MAY  OVEREXTEND  OUR  MANAGEMENT  AND OTHER
RESOURCES,  CAUSING  INEFFICIENCIES,  WHICH MAY  ADVERSELY  AFFECT OUR OPERATING
RESULTS.

            We intend to continue to expand our operations aggressively.  We may
be unable to:

               o  manage effectively the expansion of our operations;
               o  implement and develop our systems, procedures or controls;
               o  adequately support our operations;

                                       8



               o  achieve and manage the currently  projected  installations  of
                  bulk CO2 systems; or
               o  maintain our superior level of customer service.

            If we are  unable to manage our growth  effectively,  our  business,
financial  condition  and results of  operations  and our ability to service our
indebtedness  could be seriously harmed. The growth in the size and scale of our
business  has  placed,  and we expect  it will  continue  to place,  significant
demands on our personnel and operating  systems.  Any  additional  expansion may
further strain management and other resources.  Our ability to manage our growth
effectively will depend on our ability to:

               o  improve our operating systems;
               o  expand, train and mange our employee base; and
               o  develop additional service capacity.

OUR FUTURE  OPERATING  RESULTS  ARE  UNCERTAIN  DESPITE  THE GROWTH  RATE IN OUR
REVENUES AND STRONG BACKLOG.

            You  should  not  consider  growth  rates  in  our  revenues  to  be
indicative of growth rates in our operating results. In addition, you should not
consider  prior growth rates in our revenues to be  indicative  of future growth
rates in our  revenues.  The timing and amount of future  revenues  will  depend
almost  entirely  on our  ability to obtain  agreements  with new  customers  to
install  bulk CO2 systems and use our  services,  and on our ability to increase
the density of our customer base for our existing service  locations in order to
allow for increased  absorption of our fixed costs. Our future operating results
will depend on many factors, including:

            o   the level of product and price competition;
            o   our ability to manage growth;
            o   our ability to hire additional employees; and
            o   our ability to control costs.

            As of  June  30,  2005,  we  had a  signed  contractual  backlog  of
approximately  5,300 new customer accounts awaiting  activation.  However,  this
backlog is not  necessarily  indicative  of future growth rates in our operating
results,  which will depend in part on our  ability to  implement  new  customer
agreements.  Additionally,  these  agreements may be subject to  modification or
termination  prior to implementation or may not be implemented for a significant
period of time due to customers' prior contractual commitments.

WE LACK  PRODUCT  DIVERSITY,  AND  OUR  BUSINESS  DEPENDS  ON  CONTINUED  MARKET
ACCEPTANCE BY THE FOUNTAIN  BEVERAGE MARKET OF OUR BULK CO2 SYSTEMS AND CONSUMER
PREFERENCE FOR CARBONATED BEVERAGES.

            We depend on continued market  acceptance of our bulk CO2 systems by
the  fountain  beverage  market,  which  accounts for  substantially  all of our
revenues.  Unlike  many of our  competitors  for whom  bulk  CO2 is a  secondary
business,  we have no material  lines of business other than the leasing of bulk
CO2  systems  and  the  sale  of  bulk  CO2.  We  currently  do  not  anticipate
diversifying into other product or service lines.  Although conversion from high
pressure  cylinders to bulk CO2 systems  represents a continued  opportunity for
growth in the bulk CO2  market,  total  demand  for CO2 is limited  because  the
fountain  beverage  market is mature.  Our ability to grow is dependent upon the
success of our marketing  efforts to acquire new customers and their  acceptance
of bulk CO2 systems as a  replacement  for high  pressure  cylinders.  While the
fountain  beverage  market to date has been  receptive to bulk CO2  systems,  we
cannot be certain that the operating  results of our installed  base of bulk CO2
systems will continue to be favorable or that past results will be indicative of
future market acceptance of our services. In addition, any recession experienced
by the fountain beverage market or any significant shift in consumer preferences
away from  carbonated  beverages to other types of  beverages  would result in a
loss of revenues,  which would  adversely  affect our  financial  condition  and
results of operations and our ability to service our indebtedness.

WE HAVE SUBSTANTIAL INDEBTEDNESS AND OUR OBLIGATION TO SERVICE THAT INDEBTEDNESS
COULD DIVERT FUNDS FROM  OPERATIONS  AND LIMIT OUR ABILITY TO OBTAIN  ADDITIONAL
FUNDING TO EXPAND OUR BUSINESS.

            As  of  September  6,  2005,  we  had  outstanding  indebtedness  of
approximately $30.5 million under our revolving credit facility.

                                       9



            If we are unable to  generate  sufficient  cash flow to service  our
indebtedness, we will have to:

            o   reduce or delay planned capital expenditures;
            o   sell assets;
            o   restructure or refinance our indebtedness; or
            o   seek additional equity capital.

            We are uncertain  whether any of these strategies can be effected on
satisfactory  terms,  if at  all,  particularly  in  light  of  our  substantial
indebtedness.  In addition,  the extent to which we continue to have substantial
indebtedness could have significant consequences, including:

            o   our  ability to obtain  additional  financing  in the future for
                working capital,  capital  expenditures,  acquisitions and other
                general  corporate   purposes  may  be  materially   limited  or
                impaired;

            o   a substantial  portion of our cash flow from operations may need
                to be dedicated to the payment of principal  and interest on our
                indebtedness  and  therefore may not be available to finance our
                business; and

            o   our high degree of  indebtedness  may make us more vulnerable to
                economic downturns,  limit our ability to withstand  competitive
                pressures or reduce our  flexibility  in  responding to changing
                business and economic conditions.

            Our  agreements  with  our  lenders  require  that  we  comply  with
financial and business  covenants.  If we fail to maintain these covenants,  our
lenders  could  declare us in default.  They could  demand the  repayment of our
indebtedness to them if this default were not cured or waived.  At various times
in the past,  we have  been  unable to meet  certain  covenants  and have had to
obtain  waivers or  modifications  of terms from our lenders.  In addition,  the
conditions that these  agreements  place on the amount of debt we can incur, our
level of liquidity and our cash flows may have a negative  effect on our ability
to grow our business.

IMPLEMENTING  OUR  ACQUISITION   STRATEGY  INVOLVES  RISK  AND  OUR  FAILURE  TO
SUCCESSFULLY IMPLEMENT THIS STRATEGY COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR
BUSINESS.

            One of our key  strategies  is to grow our  business by  selectively
pursuing  acquisitions  of bulk  CO2  customer  accounts.  Since  1995,  we have
acquired more than 25,000 bulk CO2 customer  accounts,  and we are continuing to
actively  pursue   additional   customer  account   acquisition   opportunities.
Acquisitions involve risks, including those relating to:

            o   identification   of   appropriate   acquisition   candidates  or
                negotiation of acquisitions on favorable terms and valuations;
            o   integration of acquired bulk CO2 customer accounts;
            o   implementation of proper business and accounting controls;
            o   ability to obtain financing, on favorable terms or at all;
            o   diversion of management attention;
            o   retention of bulk CO2 customers;
            o   maintaining  our  superior  level  of  customer  service  as  we
                continue to grow; and
            o   unexpected costs, expenses and liabilities.

            Our growth  strategy may affect  short-term cash flow and net income
as we expend  funds,  increase  indebtedness  and incur  additional  expenses in
connection  with  pursuing  acquisitions  of  bulk  CO2  customer  accounts.  We
experienced  some of the risk described above  following  prior  acquisitions of
bulk CO2  customer  accounts.  As a result,  we were unable to manage our growth
effectively and our customer service levels declined.  As a result, our business
suffered.  If we are not able to identify or acquire bulk CO2 customer  accounts
consistent with our growth strategy or if we fail to integrate any acquired bulk
CO2  customer  accounts  into our  operations  successfully,  we may not achieve
anticipated increases in revenue,  costs savings and economies of scale, and our
operating results may be adversely affected.

                                       10



THE  FOUNTAIN  BEVERAGE  CARBONATION  MARKET  IS  HIGHLY  COMPETITIVE,  AND  OUR
INABILITY  TO  RESPOND TO VARIOUS  COMPETITIVE  FACTORS  MAY RESULT IN A LOSS OF
CURRENT CUSTOMERS AND A FAILURE TO ATTRACT NEW CUSTOMERS.

            The fountain beverage  carbonation market is highly competitive.  We
primarily compete on a regional and local basis with several direct competitors.
We cannot be certain  that these  competitors  will not  substantially  increase
their  installed  base of bulk CO2 systems and expand their service  nationwide,
provide  customer service superior to ours or reduce the price of their services
below our prices.  As there are no major  barriers to entry with  respect to the
delivery  of bulk CO2 on a local or regional  basis,  we also face the risk of a
well-capitalized  competitor's  entry  into  our  existing  or  future  local or
regional markets. In addition, we compete with numerous distributors of bulk and
high pressure CO2, including;

            o   industrial gas and welding supply companies;
            o   specialty gas companies;
            o   restaurant and grocery supply companies; and
            o   fountain supply companies.

            These  suppliers vary widely in size.  Some of our  competitors  may
have significantly  greater financial,  technical or marketing resources than we
do. Our  competitors  might  succeed in  developing  technologies,  products  or
services that are  superior,  less costly or more widely used than those that we
have or are  developing  or that  would  render  our  technologies  or  products
obsolete or uncompetitive.  In addition,  competitors may have an advantage over
us with  customers who prefer  dealing with one company that can supply bulk CO2
as well as fountain  syrup. We cannot be certain that we will be able to compete
effectively with current or future competitors.

WE DEPEND ON THE CONTINUED CONTRIBUTIONS OF OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND OTHER KEY
MANAGEMENT, EACH OF WHOM WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO REPLACE.

            Our  future  success  depends  to  a  significant  degree  upon  the
continued  contributions of our senior management and our ability to attract and
retain other highly  qualified  management  personnel.  We face  competition for
management from other companies and organizations. Therefore, we may not be able
to retain our existing management  personnel or fill new management positions or
vacancies created by expansion or turnover at our existing  compensation levels.
We have entered into executive employment  agreements with key members of senior
management.  The employment  agreements with our chief executive officer,  chief
financial officer,  chief operating officer and chief customer officer expire in
June 2007,  October 2006, May 2006 and June 2009,  respectively.  We do not have
"key-person"  insurance  on the lives of any of our key  officers or  management
personnel  to mitigate  the impact to our  company  that the loss of any of them
would  cause.  Specifically,  the loss of any of our  executive  officers  would
disrupt  our  operations  and divert  the time and  attention  of our  remaining
officers.   Additionally,   failure  to  attract  and  retain  highly  qualified
management personnel would damage our business prospects.

AS WE ARE DEPENDENT ON THIRD-PARTY  SUPPLIERS,  WE MAY HAVE  DIFFICULTY  FINDING
SUITABLE  REPLACEMENTS TO MEET OUR NEEDS IF THESE SUPPLIERS CEASE DOING BUSINESS
WITH US.

            We do not conduct  manufacturing  operations  and  depend,  and will
continue to depend,  on outside  parties for the manufacture of bulk CO2 systems
and components. We intend to significantly expand our installed base of bulk CO2
systems.  Our  expansion  may be limited by the  manufacturing  capacity  of our
third-party   manufacturers.   Manufacturers   may  not  be  able  to  meet  our
manufacturing  needs  in a  satisfactory  and  timely  manner.  If  there  is an
unanticipated  increase in demand for bulk CO2 systems, we may be unable to meet
such demand due to manufacturing constraints.  We purchase bulk CO2 systems from
Chart Industries,  Inc. and Harsco  Corporation,  the two major manufacturers of
bulk CO2  systems.  Should  either  manufacturer  cease  manufacturing  bulk CO2
systems, we would be required to locate additional  suppliers.  We may be unable
to locate alternate manufacturers on a timely basis or negotiate the purchase of
bulk CO2 systems on favorable  terms.  A delay in the supply of bulk CO2 systems
could cause potential customers to delay their decision to purchase our services
or to choose not to purchase  our  services.  This would  result in delays in or
loss of future revenues.

            In  addition,  we purchase CO2 for resale to our  customers.  In May
1997, we entered into an exclusive bulk CO2  requirements  contract with The BOC
Group,  Inc.  In the event that BOC is unable to fulfill  our  requirements,  we
would  have to  locate  additional  suppliers.  A delay in  locating  additional
suppliers or our inability to locate  additional  suppliers would result in loss
of revenues, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations and our ability to service our indebtedness.

                                       11



WE ARE  DEPENDENT  ON THE  PRICING  AND  AVAILABILITY  OF CO2 AND  SHORTAGES  OR
INCREASES IN THE PRICE OF CO2 OR OTHER RAW MATERIALS COULD INCREASE OUR COSTS OF
GOODS SOLD, REDUCE OUR PROFITS AND MARGINS AND ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR OPERATIONS.

            Our principal raw material is CO2, which is a commodity product.  We
purchase  our CO2 for  resale  from  The BOC  Group,  Inc.  under  an  exclusive
requirements  contract expiring in 2011 which provides for annual adjustments in
the purchase  price for bulk CO2 based upon changes in the Producer  Price Index
for Chemical and Allied Products or increases in the price of bulk CO2 purchased
by  BOC's  large,  multi-location  beverage  customers  in  the  United  States,
whichever is less.

            Steel is used in the  manufacture of our bulk CO2 tanks. We purchase
our  tanks  from  manufacturers  under  agreements,   the  terms  of  which  are
renegotiated on an annual basis. Hot rolled steel prices increased significantly
during fiscal 2005. Future increases in steel prices may result in higher prices
for the CO2 tanks we must purchase.

            Our  business  also  depends on our  ability  to deliver  CO2 to our
customers through specialized CO2 delivery vehicles. There have been significant
increases in fuel costs in recent  years.  Continued  high fuel costs or further
increases and our  inability to pass on increases to our customers  could reduce
our profits and margins.

            Increases in the prices of CO2,  bulk CO2 tanks and fuel,  including
increases that may occur as a result of shortages, duties or other restrictions,
could  increase  our cost of sales and reduce  profits  and  margins.  We cannot
assure you that  shortages or  increases  in the prices of our raw  materials or
fuel will not have an adverse  effect on our financial  condition and results of
operations.

OUR OPERATING RESULTS MAY FLUCTUATE DUE TO SEASONALITY BECAUSE CONSUMERS TEND TO
DRINK FEWER QUANTITIES OF CARBONATED BEVERAGES DURING THE WINTER MONTHS.

            Demand for CO2 in times of cold or  inclement  weather is lower than
at other times. Based on historical data and expected trends, we anticipate that
revenues  from the  delivery  of CO2 will be  highest in our first  quarter  and
lowest in our third  quarter.  As a result,  we expect our quarterly  results of
operations to continue to experience  variability from quarter to quarter in the
future.

OUR OPERATING  RESULTS ARE AFFECTED BY RISING  INTEREST  RATES SINCE MORE OF OUR
CASH FLOW WILL BE NEEDED TO SERVICE OUR INDEBTEDNESS.

            The  interest  rate on our credit  facility  fluctuates  with market
interest rates,  resulting in greater interest costs in times of rising interest
rates. Consequently, our earnings, cash flows and profitability are sensitive to
changes in interest rates.  High interest rates could also affect our ability to
service our indebtedness.  To the extent that we cannot generate sufficient cash
flows to make interest payments on time, our lenders could declare us in default
and demand repayment of our indebtedness,  which could have a negative effect on
our financial condition.

OUR INSURANCE  POLICIES MAY NOT COVER ALL OPERATING  RISKS,  AND A CASUALTY LOSS
BEYOND OUR COVERAGE COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR BUSINESS.

            Our operations are subject to all of the operating hazards and risks
normally incidental to handling, storing and transporting CO2. CO2 is classified
as a hazardous  material and can cause  serious  injuries  such as frostbite and
asphyxiation  that may  result  in, and have in the past  resulted  in,  serious
injury  or death to our  employees  and other  persons.  We  maintain  insurance
policies in such amounts and with such coverages and deductibles that we believe
are  reasonable  and prudent.  However,  we cannot assure you that our insurance
will be adequate to protect us from all  liabilities and expenses that may arise
from  claims for  personal  injury or death or  property  damage  arising in the
ordinary  course  of  business  or that  current  levels  of  insurance  will be
maintained or available at economical  prices. If a significant  liability claim
is brought  against us that is not covered by insurance,  we may have to pay the
claim with our own funds and our financial  condition and ability to service our
indebtedness could be seriously harmed.

OUR BUSINESS AND  FACILITIES ARE SUBJECT TO EXTENSIVE  GOVERNMENTAL  REGULATION,
WHICH MAY INCREASE OUR COST OF DOING  BUSINESS.  IN ADDITION,  FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH THESE  REGULATIONS MAY SUBJECT US TO FINES,  PENALTIES  AND/OR  INJUNCTIONS
THAT MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR OPERATING RESULTS.

            Our business and facilities are subject to federal,  state and local
laws and  regulations  adopted  for the use,  storage and  handling of CO2,  the
protection of the environment,  the health and safety of our employees and users

                                       12



of our products and services.  Among these environmental laws are rules by which
a current  or  previous  lessee  may be liable  for the costs of  investigation,
removal or  remediation of hazardous  materials at such  property.  In addition,
these laws typically impose liability  regardless of whether the lessee knew, or
was  responsible  for,  the  presence of any  hazardous  materials.  Persons who
arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous  materials  may be liable for
the costs of  investigation,  removal or remediation  of such  substances at the
disposal or treatment  site,  regardless  of whether the affected site is owned,
leased or operated by them.

            As we lease a number of service locations that may store,  handle or
arrange for the disposal of various hazardous materials,  we may incur costs for
investigation,  removal and  remediation,  as well as capital costs,  associated
with compliance with environmental laws.  Although  environmental costs have not
been  material  in the past,  we cannot be certain  that these  matters,  or any
similar liabilities that arise in the future, will not exceed our resources, nor
can we completely eliminate the risk of accidental  contamination or injury from
these materials. The transportation of bulk CO2 is also subject to regulation by
various  federal,  state and local  agencies,  including the U.S.  Department of
Transportation.  These  regulatory  authorities  have broad  powers,  and we are
subject to regulatory and  legislative  changes that can affect the economics of
our industry by  requiring  changes in operating  practices or  influencing  the
demand for and the cost of providing  services.  A  significant  increase in the
cost of our operations  resulting from changing  governmental  regulations could
adversely affect our profitability.

WE MAY BE LIMITED IN OUR ABILITY TO OFFSET  FUTURE  TAXABLE  INCOME WITH OUR NET
OPERATING LOSS CARRYFORWARDS.

            We have net  operating  loss  carryforwards  for  federal  and state
income  tax  purposes.  If we  undergo  an  ownership  change  in the  future as
described in Section 382 of the Internal  Revenue Code, our ability to use those
net operating  losses to offset future taxable  income may be limited.  This may
have the effect of reducing our after-tax cash flow in future years.

THE MARKET  PRICE OF OUR COMMON  STOCK HAS BEEN AND MAY  CONTINUE TO BE VOLATILE
AND MAY DECLINE REGARDLESS OF OUR OPERATING PERFORMANCE.

            Our  common  stock  price  has  fluctuated  substantially  since our
initial   public   offering  in  December   1995  and  has  recently   increased
significantly.  From June 30, 2004 to June 30, 2005,  the closing sales price of
our common stock as reported on The Nasdaq National Market increased from $19.63
per share to $25.67 per share.  Our common stock  closing  sales price reached a
52-week  high of $27.00 on July 5,  2005.  There  can be no  assurance  that the
market  price  for our  common  stock  will  remain at its  current  level and a
decrease in the market price could result in substantial loses for investors.

            The market price of our common stock may be  significantly  affected
by the following factors:

            o   announcements  of  technological  innovations or new products or
                services by us or our competitors;
            o   trends and fluctuations in the use of bulk CO2 systems;
            o   timing of bulk CO2 systems  installations  relative to financial
                reporting periods;
            o   release of securities analysts' reports;
            o   operating results below expectations;
            o   changes  in, or our  failure  to meet,  financial  estimates  by
                securities analysts;
            o   our business prospects as perceived by others;
            o   market reaction to any acquisitions,  joint ventures,  strategic
                investments or alliances announced by us or our competitors;
            o   industry developments;
            o   market acceptance of bulk CO2 systems;
            o   decrease in the safety record in the use of bulk CO2 systems;
            o   economic and other external factors; and
            o   period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results.

            The  volatility in our share price as a result of any of the factors
described  above,  many of  which  are  beyond  our  control,  could  result  in
substantial or total losses for investors.

            The securities  markets have also experienced  significant price and
volume  fluctuations  from  time to time  that are  unrelated  to the  operating
performance  of  particular  companies.   These  market  fluctuations  may  also
materially  and  adversely  affect the  market  price of our  common  stock.  In

                                       13



addition,  because the daily trading volume in our common stock has from time to
time been light, investors may not be able to sell our common stock on favorable
terms or in the volume and at the times desired.

WE DO NOT INTEND TO PAY DIVIDENDS FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.

            We have  never  declared  or paid any cash  dividends  on our common
stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings for funding growth.

WE MAY ISSUE PREFERRED STOCK WHICH COULD LIMIT INVESTORS' ABILITY TO ACQUIRE OUR
COMMON STOCK AND AFFECT OUR MARKET PRICE.

            Our board of  directors  has the  authority to issue up to 5,000,000
shares of preferred  stock. Our articles of  incorporation  currently  authorize
5,000 shares of Series A 8% cumulative convertible preferred stock, 2,500 shares
on Series B 8%  cumulative  convertible  preferred  stock and 200,000  shares of
Series C  participating  preferred  stock.  No  shares  of  preferred  stock are
currently issued and outstanding. If we designate or issue a series of preferred
stock,  it will  create  additional  securities  that  will  have  dividend  and
liquidation  preferences  over  the  common  shares.  If  we  issue  convertible
preferred  stock, a subsequent  conversion may dilute the current  shareholders'
interest.  Without any further  vote or action on the part of the  shareholders,
our board of directors  will have the authority to determine the price,  rights,
preferences,  privileges  and  restrictions  of the  preferred  stock.  Although
issuing  preferred  stock could provide us with  flexibility in connection  with
possible  acquisitions  and other corporate  purposes,  the issuance may make it
more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting
stock,  which could limit the price  investors are willing to pay for our common
stock.

OUR  CHARTER'S  ANTI-TAKEOVER  PROVISIONS  AND  FLORIDA  LAW COULD  RESTRICT  AN
INVESTOR'S  ABILITY TO PURCHASE OUR COMMON STOCK AT A FAVORABLE PRICE AND AFFECT
OUR MARKET VALUE.

            We have adopted a shareholder  rights plan that may prevent a change
in  control or sale of us in a manner or on terms not  approved  by the board of
directors.  In addition,  our articles of incorporation provide for a classified
board of directors. This structure may significantly extend the time required to
effect a change in control of the board of directors and may discourage  hostile
takeover  bids for us. It could  take at least two  annual  meetings  for even a
majority of  shareholders  to make a change in control of the board of directors
because  only a minority of the  directors  is  scheduled  to be elected at each
meeting.  Without the ability to easily obtain immediate control of the board of
directors,  a  takeover  bidder may not be able to take  action to remove  other
impediments to acquiring us.

            We are also subject to several  anti-takeover  provisions that apply
to public corporations  organized under Florida law. These provisions  generally
require that certain  transactions  between a  corporation  and a holder of more
than 10% of its outstanding  voting securities must be approved by a majority of
disinterested  directors or the holders of  two-thirds  of the voting shares not
beneficially  owned  by  an  "interested  shareholder."  Additionally,  "control
shares" (shares acquired in excess of certain specified  thresholds) acquired in
specified  control  share  acquisitions  have  voting  rights only to the extent
conferred by resolution  approved by shareholders,  excluding  holders of shares
defined as "interested shares."

            A Florida corporation may opt out of the Florida  anti-takeover laws
if its articles of incorporation or, depending on the provision in question, its
bylaws so provide.  We have not opted out of the provisions of the anti-takeover
laws.  Consequently,  these  laws  could  prohibit  or delay a  merger  or other
takeover or change in control and may discourage  attempts by other companies to
acquire us.

FUTURE SALES OF SHARES MAY  ADVERSELY  AFFECT OUR STOCK PRICE SINCE ANY INCREASE
IN THE AMOUNT OF OUTSTANDING SHARES MAY HAVE A DILUTIVE EFFECT ON OUR STOCK.

            If our shareholders sell substantial  amounts of our common stock in
the public market,  the market price of our common stock could fall. These sales
could be due to shares issued upon exercise of outstanding options and warrants.
These  sales  also  might  make  it more  difficult  for us to  sell  equity  or
equity-related  securities  in the  future  at a time  and  price  that  we deem
appropriate.  At June 30, 2005, we had granted  options to purchase an aggregate
of 1,537,569  shares of common  stock at a  weighted-average  exercise  price of
$14.00 per share and  outstanding  warrants to purchase an  aggregate of 200,000
shares of common  stock at an  exercise  price of $17.00  per  share.  We cannot
assure  you  that  substantial  sales of our  common  stock  resulting  from the
exercise of stock  options or warrants will not dilute our common stock or lower
our share price.

                                       14



COMPLIANCE  WITH  CHANGING   REGULATION  OF  CORPORATE   GOVERNANCE  AND  PUBLIC
DISCLOSURE MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL EXPENSES.

            Keeping  abreast  of,  and  in  compliance   with,   changing  laws,
regulations   and  standards   relating  to  corporate   governance  and  public
disclosure,  including the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, new SEC regulations and
Nasdaq  Stock Market  rules,  will  require an  increased  amount of  management
attention and external resources. We intend to continue to invest all reasonably
necessary  resources  to comply  with  evolving  standards,  which may result in
increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time
and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

SECURITIES ANALYSTS MAY NOT CONTINUE OR INITIATE COVERAGE OF OUR COMMON STOCK OR
MAY ISSUE NEGATIVE  REPORTS,  AND THIS MAY HAVE A NEGATIVE  IMPACT ON OUR COMMON
STOCK'S MARKET PRICE.

            There is no assurance  that  securities  analysts  will  continue to
publish  research  reports on us. If  securities  analysts do not,  this lack of
research  coverage may  adversely  affect the market price of our common  stock.
Recently adopted rules mandated by the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and a global
settlement  reached between the SEC, other  regulatory  agencies and a number of
investment  banks in April 2003, has led to a number of  fundamental  changes in
how analysts  are  reviewed and  compensated.  In  particular,  many  investment
banking firms are now required to contract with independent  financial  analysts
for their stock research.  It may be difficult for companies with smaller market
capitalizations,  including us, to attract  independent  financial  analysts who
will cover our common  stock,  which could have a negative  effect on our market
price.

            The  trading  market for our  common  stock will rely in part on the
research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our
business.  If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrades our stock, our
stock price  could  decline  rapidly.  If one or more of these  analysts  ceases
coverage  of us, we could lose  visibility  in the  market,  which in turn could
cause our stock price to decline.

2.          PROPERTIES.

            Our  corporate  headquarters  are  located in a 32,000  square  foot
leased facility in Stuart, Florida that accommodates corporate,  administrative,
customer  service,  marketing,  and sales.  At June 30, 2005, we also leased 103
stationary  service  locations.  These facilities are rented on terms consistent
with market  conditions  prevailing  in the area.  We believe  that our existing
facilities are suitable for our current needs and that additional or replacement
facilities, if needed, are available to meet future needs.

3.          LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

            We are  involved  from  time to time in  litigation  arising  in the
ordinary  course  of  business,  none of which is  expected  to have a  material
adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

4.          SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

            Not applicable.

5.          MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S  COMMON EQUITY,  RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
            AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

            Our common  stock  trades on the Nasdaq  National  Market  under the
symbol "NUCO".  The following  table  indicates the high and low sale prices for
our common  stock for each  quarterly  period  during  fiscal 2004 and 2005,  as
reported by the Nasdaq National Market.

                                       15



                                            HIGH                   LOW
                                            ----                   ---
CALENDAR 2003
-------------
Third Quarter                             $ 11.48                $   8.50
Fourth Quarter                              13.20                   10.94

CALENDAR 2004
-------------
First Quarter                             $ 18.70                $  11.80
Second Quarter                              20.17                   16.70
Third Quarter                               20.58                   15.28
Fourth Quarter                              25.00                   18.58

CALENDAR 2005
-------------
First Quarter                             $ 26.62                $  20.70
Second Quarter                              27.87                   22.73

            At  September  10,  2005,  there were  approximately  200 holders of
record of our common stock, although there is a much larger number of beneficial
owners.

            We have never paid cash  dividends on our common stock and we do not
anticipate  declaring any cash dividends on our common stock in the  foreseeable
future.  We intend to retain all future  earnings for use in the  development of
our business.

            The following table sets forth certain information  regarding equity
compensation plans as of June 30, 2005.

                                                         EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

                                  Number of securities to be   Weighted-average exercise     Number of securities remaining
                                    issued upon exercise of      price of outstanding     available for future issuance under
                                      outstanding options,             options            equity compensation plans (excluding
Plan Category                         warrants and rights         warrants and rights      securities reflected in column (a)
-------------                         -------------------         -------------------      ----------------------------------
                                             (a)                          (b)                           (c)

Equity compensation plans                 1,537,569                     $14.00                        10,423
approved by security                 shares of common stock                                  shares of common stock
holders ...

Equity compensation plans not                 0                           0                               0
approved by security holders ...

              Total ...                   1,537,569                     $14.00                        10,423
                                     shares of common stock                                  shares of common stock

                                       16



6.          SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

            The Selected  Financial  Data set forth below reflect our historical
results of  operations,  financial  condition and operating data for the periods
indicated  and should be read in  conjunction  with the  consolidated  financial
statements  and notes  thereto  and  Management's  Discussion  and  Analysis  of
Financial  Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

                                                                FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                                --------------------------
                                                   2005        2004*       2003*        2002*        2001*
                                                   ----        -----       -----        -----        -----
                                                  (in thousands, except per share amounts and Operating Data)
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
Product sales ...............................   $  61,602    $  49,900   $  45,833    $  46,209    $  43,909
Equipment rentals ...........................      35,738       30,936      28,576       26,103       23,724
                                                ---------    ---------   ---------    ---------    ---------

Total revenues ..............................      97,340       80,836      74,409       72,312       67,633
                                                ---------    ---------   ---------    ---------    ---------

Cost of products sold, excluding depreciation
and amortization ............................      41,147       33,883      32,047       31,903       28,921
Cost of equipment rentals, excluding
depreciation and amortization ...............       2,522        2,345       3,513        3,595        4,270
Selling, general and administrative expenses       17,020       15,722      17,484       17,614       17,368
Depreciation and amortization ...............      16,484       15,234      17,167       16,319       17,475
Loss on asset disposal ......................       1,332        1,242       1,650        4,654        4,877
                                                ---------    ---------   ---------    ---------    ---------

Operating income (loss) .....................      18,835       12,410       2,548       (1,773)      (5,278)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt ........       5,817        1,964        --            796         --
Unrealized loss on financial instrument .....        --            177        --           --           --
Interest expense ............................       6,985        7,947       7,487        8,402       10,207
                                                ---------    ---------   ---------    ---------    ---------

Net income (loss) before income taxes .......       6,033        2,322      (4,939)     (10,971)     (15,485)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes ...     (19,558)         142        --           --           --
                                                ---------    ---------   ---------    ---------    ---------
Net income (loss) ...........................   $  25,591    $   2,180   $  (4,939)   $ (10,971)   $ (15,485)
                                                =========    =========   =========    =========    =========

Net income (loss) per basic common share ....   $    1.98    $    0.13   $   (0.54)   $   (1.32)   $   (2.01)
Net income (loss) per diluted common share ..   $    1.79    $    0.12   $   (0.54)   $   (1.32)   $   (2.01)

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic .      12,808       10,689      10,396        8,742        7,926
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted      14,295       11,822      10,396        8,742        7,926

OTHER DATA:
EBITDA (1) ..................................   $  35,319    $  27,644   $  19,715    $  14,546    $  12,197

Total company owned bulk CO2 systems serviced      82,000       68,000      63,000       61,000       60,000
Customer owned bulk CO2 systems serviced ....      16,000       12,000      11,000        9,000        9,000
                                                ---------    ---------   ---------    ---------    ---------
Total bulk CO2 systems serviced .............      98,000       80,000      74,000       70,000       69,000
Total high pressure CO2 customers ...........       1,000        1,000       1,000        1,000        2,000
                                                ---------    ---------   ---------    ---------    ---------
Total customers .............................      99,000       81,000      75,000       71,000       71,000
Stationary depots ...........................         103           97          91           76           74
Mobile depots ...............................          14           11          10           22           19
Bulk CO2 trucks .............................         203          173         168          161          157
Technical service vehicles ..................          92           83          73           76           87
High pressure cylinder delivery trucks ......        --           --          --           --              2

BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents ...................   $     968    $     505   $     455    $   1,562    $     626
Total assets ................................     173,132      128,502     125,846      132,638      138,016
Total debt (including short-term debt) ......      32,000       66,173      70,529       87,660       87,346
Redeemable preferred stock ..................        --         10,021       9,258        8,552        5,466
Total shareholders' equity ..................     129,184       40,756      34,936       25,219       33,982

*Restated to conform to current year presentation.

                                       17



(1) RECONCILIATION OF GAAP AND EBITDA

                                                                     Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
                                                    ----------------------------------------------------------
                                                       2005        2004        2003       2002        2001
                                                       ----        ----        ----       ----        ----
Net Income (loss)                                   $ 25,591    $  2,180    $ (4,939)   $(10,971)   $(15,485)
Interest expense                                       6,985       7,947       7,487       8,402      10,207
Depreciation and amortization                         16,484      15,234      17,167      16,319      17,475
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes            (19,558)        142        --          --          --
Unrealized loss on financial instrument                 --           177        --          --          --
Loss on early extinguishment of debt                   5,817       1,964        --           796        --
                                                    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------

EBITDA                                              $ 35,319    $ 27,644    $ 19,715    $ 14,546    $ 12,197
                                                    ========    ========    ========    ========    ========

Cash flows provided by (used in):
     Operating activities                           $ 29,651    $ 21,657    $ 15,826    $ 10,858    $  5,213
     Investing activities                           $(38,781)   $(16,595)   $(13,891)   $(12,817)   $(11,761)
     Financing activities                           $  9,593    $ (5,012)   $ (3,042)   $  2,895    $  6,895

            Earnings  before  interest,  taxes,  depreciation  and  amortization
("EBITDA")  is one of the principal  financial  measures by which we measure our
financial  performance.  EBITDA is a widely accepted financial indicator used by
many  investors,  lenders and  analysts to analyze and compare  companies on the
basis of  operating  performance,  and we believe  that EBITDA  provides  useful
information  regarding  our ability to service  our debt and other  obligations.
However,  EBITDA does not represent cash flow from  operations,  nor has it been
presented as a substitute to operating income or net income as indicators of our
operating  performance.  EBITDA excludes significant costs of doing business and
should not be  considered  in  isolation  or as a  substitute  for  measures  of
performance prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.  In addition,  our calculation of EBITDA may be
different  from  the  calculation  used  by  our   competitors,   and  therefore
comparability  may be  affected.  In  addition,  our lenders  also use EBITDA to
assess our compliance with debt covenants.  These financial  covenants are based
on a  measure  that  is not  consistent  with  accounting  principles  generally
accepted in the United States of America. Such measure is EBITDA (as defined) as
modified by certain defined adjustments.

7.          MANAGEMENT'S  DISCUSSION  AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL  CONDITION  AND
            RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

OVERVIEW

            We believe we are the leading  supplier of bulk CO2 systems and bulk
 CO2 for carbonating fountain beverages in the United States based on the number
 of bulk CO2 systems  leased to  customers.  As of June 30, 2005,  we operated a
 national  network  of 117  service  locations  servicing  approximately  99,000
 customer  locations in 45 states.  Currently,  virtually all fountain  beverage
 users in the continental  United States are within our present service area. On
 October 1, 2004,  we purchased  the bulk CO2 beverage  carbonation  business of
 Pain   Enterprises,   Inc.  The   transaction   involved  the   acquisition  of
 approximately 9,000 customer accounts,  including  approximately 6,300 tanks in
 service,  vehicles,  parts, and supplies.  The acquisition of Pain Enterprises'
 bulk CO2  beverage  carbonation  business  in 12  Midwestern  and  Southeastern
 states:  Florida,  Georgia,  Illinois,   Indiana,  Iowa,  Kentucky,   Michigan,
 Missouri,   Minnesota,   Ohio,   Tennessee  and  Wisconsin,   provides  further
 penetration into markets in which we operate.

            We market our bulk CO2 products and services to large customers such
as restaurant  and  convenience  store chains,  movie theater  operators,  theme
parks,  resorts  and sports  venues.  Our  customers  include  many of the major
national  and  regional  chains  throughout  the United  States.  Our success in
reaching multi-unit placement agreements is due in part to our national delivery
system. We typically  approach large chains on a corporate or regional level for
approval to become the exclusive supplier of bulk CO2 products and services on a
national  basis or  within a  designated  territory.  We then  direct  our sales
efforts to the  managers or owners of the  individual  or  franchised  operating
units.  Our  relationships   with  chain  customers  in  one  geographic  market
frequently  help us to  establish  service with these same chains when we expand
into new markets. After accessing the chain accounts in a new market, we attempt
to  rapidly  build  route  density by leasing  bulk CO2  systems to  independent
restaurants, convenience stores and theaters.

            We have entered into 34 master service  agreements  which include 31
of the largest 100 restaurant and convenience store chains that provide fountain
beverages. These master service agreements generally provide for a commitment on

                                       18



the part of the operator for all of its currently  owned  locations and may also
include future locations.  We currently service  approximately  37,000 chain and
franchisee locations with chains that have signed master service agreements.  We
are actively  working on expanding the number of master service  agreements with
numerous restaurant chains.

            We believe that our future revenue growth, gains in gross margin and
profitability  will be  dependent  upon (1)  increases  in route  density in our
existing   markets  and  the  expansion  and  penetration  of  bulk  CO2  system
installations  in new market  regions,  both resulting from  successful  ongoing
marketing,  (2) improved  operating  efficiencies and (3) price  increases.  New
multi-unit placement agreements combined with single-unit  placements will drive
improvements  in achieving route density.  We maintain a highly  efficient route
structure and  establish  additional  service  locations as service areas expand
through geographic  growth. Our entry into many states was accomplished  largely
through the acquisition of businesses having thinly developed route networks. We
expect to benefit  from route  efficiencies  and other  economies of scale as we
build our customer  base in these states  through  intensive  regional and local
marketing initiatives.  Greater density should also lead to enhanced utilization
of vehicles and other fixed assets and the ability to spread fixed marketing and
administrative costs over a broader revenue base.

            Generally,  our  experience  has been that as our service  locations
mature their gross profit margins  improve as a result of business volume growth
while fixed costs remain essentially unchanged.  New service locations typically
operate at low or negative  gross  margins in the early  stages and detract from
our highly profitable service locations in more mature markets.  Accordingly, we
believe that we are in position to build our customer base while maintaining and
improving upon our superior  levels of customer  service,  with minimal  changes
required  to support  our  infrastructure.  We  continue  to focus on  improving
operating  effectiveness,  increasing  prices for our services and strengthening
our workforce,  and anticipate that these initiatives will contribute positively
to all areas of our company.

GENERAL

            Substantially  all of our revenues have been derived from the rental
of bulk CO2 systems installed at customers' sites, the sale of bulk CO2 and high
pressure  cylinder  revenues.  Revenues  have grown from $67.6 million in fiscal
2001 to $97.3 million in fiscal 2005. We believe that our revenue base is stable
due to the existence of long-term contracts with our customers,  which generally
rollover with a limited number expiring without renewal in any one year. Revenue
growth  is  largely   dependent   on  (1)  the  rate  of  new  bulk  CO2  system
installations, (2) the growth in bulk CO2 sales and (3) price increases.

            Cost of products  sold is comprised of purchased CO2 and vehicle and
service  location costs  associated  with the storage and delivery of CO2. As of
June 30, 2005, we operated a total of 295 specialized bulk CO2 delivery vehicles
and technical  service  vehicles that logged  approximately  13 million miles in
fiscal 2005.  While  significant  increases in fuel prices  impact our operating
costs,  such impact is largely offset by fuel surcharges  billed to the majority
of our  customers.  Consequently,  while  the  impact on our  gross  profit  and
operating  income is  substantially  mitigated,  rising fuel prices do result in
lower gross  profit  margins.  Cost of  equipment  rentals is comprised of costs
associated with customer equipment leases.  Selling,  general and administrative
expenses consist of wages and benefits,  dispatch and  communications  costs, as
well as expenses  associated  with  marketing,  administration,  accounting  and
employee training. Consistent with the capital intensive nature of our business,
we incur significant depreciation and amortization expenses. These stem from the
depreciation   of  our  bulk  CO2  systems  and  related   installation   costs,
amortization of deferred lease  acquisition  costs, and amortization of deferred
financing costs and other intangible assets.  With respect to company owned bulk
CO2 systems,  we capitalize  installation  costs based on a standard  amount per
installation that is associated with specific installations of such systems with
customers under non-cancelable contracts and which would not be incurred but for
a successful  placement.  All other service,  marketing and administrative costs
are expensed as incurred.

            Since 1990,  we have  devoted  significant  resources  to building a
sales and marketing organization, adding administrative personnel and developing
a  national  infrastructure  to  support  the rapid  growth in the number of our
installed  base of bulk  CO2  systems.  The  costs  of  this  expansion  and the
significant  depreciation  expense  recognized  on our  installed  network  have
resulted in accumulated net losses of $30.1 million at June 30, 2005.

                                       19




RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

            The  following  table sets  forth,  for the periods  indicated,  the
percentage relationship which the various items bear to total revenues:

                                                      Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
                                                      --------------------------
Income Statement Data:                               2005        2004       2003
                                                     ----        ----       ----

Product sales                                        63.3%       61.7%      61.6%
Equipment rentals                                    36.7        38.3       38.4
                                                    -----       -----      -----
Total revenues                                      100.0       100.0      100.0

Cost of products sold, excluding
    depreciation and amortization                    42.3        41.9       43.1
Cost of equipment rentals, excluding
    depreciation and amortization                     2.6         2.9        4.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses         17.5        19.4       23.5
Depreciation and amortization                        16.9        18.8       23.1
Loss on asset disposal                                1.4         1.6        2.2
                                                    -----       -----      -----
Operating income                                     19.3        15.4        3.4
Loss on early extinguishment of debt                  6.0         2.5        --
Unrealized loss on financial instrument               --          0.2        --
Interest expense                                      7.1         9.8       10.0
                                                    -----       -----      -----

Income (loss) before income taxes                     6.2         2.9       (6.6)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes           (20.1)        0.2        --
                                                    -----       -----      -----
Net income (loss)                                    26.3%        2.7%      (6.6)%
                                                    =====       =====      =====

FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2004

TOTAL REVENUES

            Total  revenues  increased by $16.5  million,  or 20.4%,  from $80.8
million in 2004 to $97.3  million in 2005.  Revenues  derived  from our bulk CO2
service plans  increased by $13.9  million,  primarily due to an increase in the
number of customer locations.  During the year, the number of customer locations
utilizing our bulk CO2 services increased from 80,000 customers at June 30, 2004
to 98,000 at June 30,  2005,  due to strong  organic  growth and the purchase of
approximately 9,000 customer locations from Pain Enterprises, Inc. on October 1,
2004 which  generated  revenues of $7.3 million in 2005.  In addition,  revenues
derived from the sale of high pressure cylinder products,  fuel surcharges,  and
other revenues increased by $2.6 million.

            The  following  table sets  forth,  for the periods  indicated,  the
percentage relationship which our service plans bear to total revenues:

                                       20



                                                            Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
                                                            --------------------------
Service Plan                                                 2005             2004
                                                            -------         --------
        Bulk budget plan(1)                                  57.0%            61.5%
        Equipment lease/product purchase plan(2)             15.4             12.0
        Product purchase plan(3)                              9.7              8.8
        High pressure cylinder(4)                             5.7              6.0
        Other revenues(5)                                    12.2             11.7
                                                            -----            -----
                                                            100.0%           100.0%
                                                            ======           ======

        (1)  Combined  fee for bulk CO2 tank and bulk CO2.
        (2)  Fee for bulk CO2 tank and, separately, bulk CO2 usage.
        (3)  Bulk CO2 only.
        (4)  High pressure CO2 cylinders and non-CO2 gases.
        (5)  Surcharges and other charges.

        The high pressure  cylinder category includes all high pressure cylinder
        rental and gas  related  revenues,  including  those  revenues  for high
        pressure  cylinders  provided  as  a  peripheral  product  to  customers
        utilizing  a bulk CO2  plan  and  those  customers  that  use only  high
        pressure  cylinders.  During fiscal 2002, we adopted a plan to phase out
        those  customers  that use only high  pressure  cylinders and who do not
        utilize one of our bulk CO2 service  plans.  Revenues  derived  from our
        stand-alone high pressure cylinder customers may not be fully eliminated
        from our  ongoing  revenues  inasmuch  as our goal is to  convert  these
        customers  to  a  bulk  CO2  service  plan.  Accordingly,  the  expected
        declining  revenues  derived from  stand-alone  high  pressure  cylinder
        customers  are not expected to have a material  impact on our results of
        operations.

            PRODUCT  SALES - Revenues  derived from the product sales portion of
our service plans  increased by $11.7 million,  or 23.5%,  from $49.9 million in
2004 to $61.6  million in 2005.  The increase in revenues is primarily  due to a
17.7% increase in the average  number of customer  locations  serviced  combined
with an increase in CO2 sold to the average customer. In addition,  the sales of
products and services other than bulk CO2 increased by $2.6 million due in large
part to an increase in revenues derived from cylinder products,  fuel surcharges
and other revenues.

            EQUIPMENT  RENTALS - Revenues  derived from the lease portion of our
service plans increased by $4.8 million, or 15.5%, from $30.9 million in 2004 to
$35.7 million in 2005,  primarily due to a 16.8%  increase in the average number
of  customer  locations  leasing  equipment  from us and  price  increases  to a
significant  number of our customers  consistent  with the Consumer Price Index,
offset  by  incentive   pricing   provided  to  multiple   national   restaurant
organizations  utilizing our equipment  under the bulk budget plan and equipment
lease/product  purchase plans pursuant to master service agreements.  The number
of customer  locations  renting  equipment from us increased from 68,000 at June
30,  2004 to  82,000 at June 30,  2005,  due to strong  organic  growth  and the
purchase of approximately  6,300 customer locations  utilizing  equipment rental
plans from Pain Enterprises, Inc. on October 1, 2004.

COST OF PRODUCTS SOLD, EXCLUDING DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

            Cost of products  sold,  excluding  depreciation  and  amortization,
increased from $33.9 million in 2004 to $41.1 million in 2005,  while decreasing
as a percentage of product sales revenue from 67.9% to 66.8%.

            Product  costs  increased by $3.1 million from $12.3 million in 2004
to $15.4  million  in 2005.  The base  price with our  primary  supplier  of CO2
increased  by the  Producer  Price  Index,  while  the  volume of CO2 sold by us
increased 25.2%,  primarily due to a 17.7% increase in our average customer base
and a 6.1% increase in CO2 sold to these customers.

            Operational  costs,  primarily wages and benefits related to cost of
products  sold,  increased  from $13.3 million in 2004 to $16.0 million in 2005,
primarily due to a $2.4 million  increase in route driver costs  associated with
an increased  customer base. As of June 30, 2005, we had 332 drivers as compared
to 270 at the same point last year.

            Truck delivery expenses  increased from $5.2 million in 2004 to $6.4
million in 2005 primarily due to the increased  customer base and fuel costs. We
have been able to minimize the impact of increased fuel costs and variable lease
costs  associated with truck usage by continuing to improve  efficiencies in the
timing and routing of deliveries. While total miles driven increased by 12.8% on

                                       21



an average  customer  base that  increased  by 17.7%,  miles  driven per average
customer decreased 5.1%

            Occupancy and shop costs related to cost of products sold  increased
from $3.1 million in 2004 to $3.3 million in 2005.

COST OF EQUIPMENT RENTALS, EXCLUDING DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

            Cost of equipment rentals,  excluding depreciation and amortization,
increased from $2.3 million in 2004 to $2.5 million in 2005 while  decreasing as
a percentage of equipment rentals revenue from 7.6% to 7.1%. The increase in the
cost  of  equipment   rental   expense  is  primarily   related  to   additional
refurbishment expense associated with tanks acquired from Pain Enterprises, Inc.
in October 2004, and the rental of bulk CO2 equipment from third parties.

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

            Selling,  general  and  administrative  expenses  increased  by $1.3
million from $15.7 million in 2004 to $17.0 million in 2005, while decreasing as
a percentage of total revenues from 19.4% in 2004 to 17.5% in 2005.

            Selling  related  expenses  increased  by $0.3  million,  from  $3.3
million  in 2004 to $3.6  million  in 2005,  primarily  the  result of  expenses
directed towards training, marketing and growth opportunities.

            General and administrative  expenses  increased by $1.0 million,  or
7.9%, from $12.4 million in 2004 to $13.4 million in 2005. This increase was the
result of  acquisition  integration,  wage  increases,  provision  for  doubtful
accounts,  public company related  expenses,  including  expenses related to the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, and expenses  associated  with the four  hurricanes
that  impacted the  southeastern  United  States in during the first  quarter of
fiscal 2005.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

            Depreciation and  amortization  increased from $15.2 million in 2004
to $16.5 million in 2005. As a percentage of total  revenues,  depreciation  and
amortization expense decreased from 18.8% in 2004 to 16.9% in 2005.

            Depreciation  expense  increased from $13.2 million in 2004 to $13.8
million in 2005. An increase of  approximately  $0.5 million due to the purchase
of tanks and equipment from Pain Enterprises, Inc., was offset by a $0.3 million
decrease in  depreciation  associated  with the shortened lives of certain small
tanks that were  partially  impaired and scheduled to be phased out over a three
to four year period commencing June 30, 2002.

            Amortization  expense  increased  from $2.0  million in 2004 to $2.7
million in 2005.  This increase is due in large part to a $0.6 million  increase
in amortization  associated with the acquisition of customer  accounts and other
intangible assets associated with the Pain Enterprises, Inc. transaction.

LOSS ON ASSET DISPOSAL

            Loss on asset  disposal  increased from $1.2 million in 2004 to $1.3
million in 2005, decreasing as a percentage of total revenues from 1.6% to
1.4%.

OPERATING INCOME

            For the reasons previously discussed,  operating income increased by
$6.4  million  from  $12.4  million  in 2004 to  $18.8  million  in  2005.  As a
percentage of total  revenues,  operating  income improved from 15.4% in 2004 to
19.3% in 2005.

                                       22



LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT

            In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, we accelerated  the recognition
of $1.5 million in deferred  financing costs  associated with the refinancing of
our  long-term  debt.  In  addition,  we  accelerated  the  recognition  of  the
unamortized  portion of the  original  issue  discount  associated  with our 12%
Senior  Subordinated  Promissory Notes,  $0.4 million,  and paid $0.1 million in
conjunction with the early termination of an interest rate swap agreement.

            In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we accelerated the recognition
of $2.4 million in deferred  financing costs  associated with the refinancing of
our long-term  debt. In addition,  in connection with the repayment of our 16.3%
Senior  Subordinated  Promissory Notes we incurred a prepayment  penalty of $1.8
million  and  accelerated  the  recognition  of the  unamortized  portion of the
original issue discount associated with those notes, $1.6 million.

            See "Liquidity and Capital Resources."

UNREALIZED LOSS ON FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT

            In order to reduce our exposure to increases in Eurodollar  interest
rates, and consequently to increases in interest  payments,  on October 2, 2003,
we entered into an interest rate swap  transaction (the "Swap") in the amount of
$20.0 million (the "Notional  Amount") with an effective date of March 15, 2004.
Pursuant  to the  Swap,  we pay a fixed  interest  rate of 2.12%  per  annum and
receive  a  Eurodollar-based  floating  rate.  The  effect  of  the  Swap  is to
neutralize any changes in Eurodollar rates on the Notional  Amount.  As the Swap
was not effective until March 15, 2004 and no cash flows were exchanged prior to
that date,  the Swap did not meet the  requirements  to be  designated as a cash
flow hedge.  As such, an unrealized  loss of $0.2 million was  recognized in our
results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2004,  reflecting the
change in fair value of the Swap from  inception to the  effective  date.  As of
March 31, 2004,  the Swap met the  requirements  to be designated as a cash flow
hedge and is deemed a highly effective transaction.

INTEREST EXPENSE

            Interest expense decreased from $7.9 million in 2004 to $7.0 million
in 2005, while decreasing as a percentage of total revenues from 9.8% in 2004 to
7.1% in 2005.  This  reduction  in expense was due in large part to repayment of
our  16.3%  Senior   Subordinated   Promissory  Notes  in  April  2005  and  the
modification of our former senior  borrowing  facilities at more favorable rates
in October 2004 in conjunction with the Pain Enterprises, Inc. transaction.
See "Liquidity and Capital Resources."

            The effective interest rate of our debt decreased from 11.4% in 2004
to 10.5% in 2005, with the weighted cost of borrowing on our outstanding debt as
of June 30, 2005 being 4.8%.

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

            For  the  reasons  described  above,   income  before  income  taxes
increased from $2.3 million 2004 to $6.0 million in 2005.

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

            As of June 30, 2005, we had net  operating  loss  carryforwards  for
federal income tax purposes of approximately $114 million and for state purposes
in varying amounts, which are available to offset future federal taxable income,
if any, in varying  amounts  through  June 2025.  If an  "ownership  change" for
federal income tax purposes were to occur in the future,  our ability to use our
pre-ownership  change  federal and state net operating loss  carryforwards  (and
certain built-in losses, if any) would be subject to an annual usage limitation,
which under  certain  circumstances  may prevent us from being able to utilize a
portion  of such loss  carryforwards  in future tax  periods  and may reduce our
after-tax cash flow. In addition,  a portion of our future taxable income may be
subject to the alternative minimum tax ("AMT")

            We  continue  to  evaluate  the  necessity  of a deferred  tax asset
valuation allowance. Deferred income taxes reflect the benefits of net operating
loss carryforwards and the net tax effects of temporary  differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial  reporting purposes and
the amounts used for income tax  purposes.  Our deferred tax assets  include the
benefit of loss  carryforwards  incurred  through  fiscal 2005. In assessing the

                                       23




realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than
not that some  portion or all of the  deferred  tax assets will not be realized.
Among other matters,  realization of the entire  deferred tax asset is dependent
on our ability to generate  sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of
the carryforwards.

            As of June 30, 2005, after  consideration of all available  positive
and negative evidence,  we concluded that the deferred tax asset relating to our
net operating  loss  carryforwards  will more likely than not be realized in the
future.  Thus,  the entire  valuation  allowance  was reversed and reported as a
component  of the fiscal 2005 income tax  provision.  See  "Critical  Accounting
Policies and Significant Estimates."  Accordingly,  we recognized a $19.6 income
tax benefit in fiscal 2005.  During fiscal 2004, we recognized  $0.1 million for
AMT and state/local taxes.

            While we  anticipate  recognizing  a full tax  provision  in  future
periods,  we expect to pay only AMT and  state/local  taxes until such time that
our net operating loss carryforwards are fully utilized.

NET INCOME

            For the reasons  described  above,  net income  increased  from $2.2
million 2004 to $25.6 million in 2005.

EBITDA

            Earnings  before  interest,  taxes,  depreciation  and  amortization
("EBITDA")  is one of the principal  financial  measures by which we measure our
financial  performance.  EBITDA is a widely accepted financial indicator used by
many  investors,  lenders and  analysts to analyze and compare  companies on the
basis of  operating  performance,  and we believe  that EBITDA  provides  useful
information  regarding  our ability to service  our debt and other  obligations.
However,  EBITDA does not represent cash flow from  operations,  nor has it been
presented as a substitute to operating income or net income as indicators of our
operating  performance.  EBITDA excludes significant costs of doing business and
should not be  considered  in  isolation  or as a  substitute  for  measures  of
performance prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.  In addition,  our calculation of EBITDA may be
different  from  the  calculation  used  by  our   competitors,   and  therefore
comparability  may be  affected.  In  addition,  our lenders  also use EBITDA to
assess our compliance with debt covenants.  These financial  covenants are based
on a  measure  that  is not  consistent  with  accounting  principles  generally
accepted in the United States of America. Such measure is EBITDA (as defined) as
modified by certain defined adjustments.

            EBITDA, as set forth in the table below (in thousands), increased by
$7.7 million,  or 27.8%, from $27.6 million in 2004 to $35.3 million in 2005 and
increased as a percentage of total revenues from 34.2 % to 36.3%.

                                                      Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
                                                      --------------------------
                                                         2005            2004
                                                       --------        ---------
Net income                                             $ 25,591        $  2,180
Interest expense                                          6,985           7,947
Depreciation and amortization                            16,484          15,234
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes               (19,558)            142
Unrealized loss on financial instrument                    --               177
Loss on early extinguishment of debt                      5,817           1,964
EBITDA                                                 $ 35,319        $ 27,644

Cash flows provided by (used in):
  Operating activities                                 $ 29,651        $ 21,657
  Investing activities                                 $(38,781)       $(16,595)
  Financing activities                                 $  9,593        $ (5,012)

FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2004 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2003

TOTAL REVENUES

            Total  revenues  increased  by $6.4  million,  or 8.6%,  from  $74.4
million in 2003 to $80.8 million in 2004. Revenues derived from our bulk service
plans  increased by $7.2 million,  or 10.0%, of which $5.8 million was due to an
increase  in the number of accounts  and $1.4  million was due to an increase in
the sale of gases and services  other than CO2.  These  increases were partially
offset by the net impact of a $0.8  million  decrease in revenue  derived from a

                                       24



slight  decrease  in pricing of CO2.  This  decrease in pricing was due in large
part to incentive pricing provided to multiple national restaurant organizations
utilizing both our equipment  lease/product  purchase, and product only purchase
plans.

            The  following  table sets  forth,  for the periods  indicated,  the
percentage relationship which our service plans bear to total revenues:

                                              Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
                                              --------------------------
Service Plan                                     2004           2003
                                                ------        --------
Bulk budget plan(1)                              61.5%          65.5%
Equipment lease/product purchase plan(2)         12.0            8.7
Product purchase plan(3)                          8.8            8.4
High pressure cylinder(4)                         6.0            6.1
Other revenues(5)                                11.7           11.3
                                                -----          -----
                                                100.0%         100.0%
                                                =====          =====

        (1) Combined  fee for bulk CO2 tank and bulk CO2.
        (2) Fee for bulk CO2 tank and, separately, bulk CO2 usage.
        (3) Bulk CO2 only.
        (4) High pressure CO2 cylinders and non-CO2 gases.
        (5) Surcharges and other charges.

        The high pressure  cylinder category includes all high pressure cylinder
        rental and gas  related  revenues,  including  those  revenues  for high
        pressure  cylinders  provided  as  a  peripheral  product  to  customers
        utilizing  a bulk CO2  plan  and  those  customers  that  use only  high
        pressure  cylinders.  During fiscal 2002, we adopted a plan to phase out
        those  customers  that use only high  pressure  cylinders and who do not
        utilize one of our bulk CO2 service  plans.  Revenues  derived  from our
        stand-alone high pressure cylinder customers may not be fully eliminated
        from our  ongoing  revenues  inasmuch  as our goal is to  convert  these
        customers  to  a  bulk  CO2  service  plan.  Accordingly,  the  expected
        declining  revenues  derived from  stand-alone  high  pressure  cylinder
        customers  are not expected to have a material  impact on our results of
        operations.

            PRODUCT  SALES - Revenues  derived from the product sales portion of
our service contracts  increased by $4.1 million, or 8.9%, from $45.8 million in
2003 to $49.9  million  in 2004.  The  increase  in  revenues  is due to an 8.2%
increase  in the  average  number  of  customer  locations  serviced  and a 1.0%
increase in CO2 used by the average  customer.  In addition,  sales of gases and
services  other than CO2,  increased by $1.4  million or 11.0%  compared to last
year.  All of this was  partially  offset by a 1.7%  decrease in pricing of CO2.
This decrease in pricing was due in large part to incentive  pricing provided to
multiple  national  restaurant   organizations   utilizing  both  our  equipment
lease/product purchase, and product only purchase plans.

            EQUIPMENT  RENTALS - Revenues  derived from the lease portion of our
service contracts increased by $2.3 million, or 8.3%, from $28.6 million in 2003
to $30.9 million in 2004, primarily due to a 7.3% increase in the average number
of customers  leasing  equipment  from us and price  increases to a  significant
number of our customers,  consistent  with the Consumer  Price Index,  partially
offset  by  incentive   pricing   provided  to  multiple   national   restaurant
organizations utilizing our equipment under the equipment lease/product purchase
plan.

COST OF PRODUCTS SOLD, EXCLUDING DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

            Cost of products  sold,  excluding  depreciation  and  amortization,
increased from $32.0 million in 2003 to $33.9 million in 2004,  while decreasing
as a percentage of product sales from 69.9% to 67.9%. Product costs increased by
$1.4 million from $10.9 million in 2003 to $12.3 million in 2004. The base price
with our primary  supplier of CO2 increased by the Producer  Price Index,  while
the  volume  of CO2 sold by us  increased  by  10.2%,  primarily  due to an 8.2%
increase in our average customer base.

            Operational  costs,  primarily wages and benefits related to cost of
products  sold,  increased  from $12.4 million in 2003 to $13.3 million in 2004,
primarily due to an increase in route driver costs.  As of June 30, 2004, we had
270 drivers as compared to 249 last year, primarily  representing the filling of
open positions. However, some of the headcount increase in drivers was offset by
a reduction in depot and regional management  headcount.  In addition,  while we

                                       25



have  realized a  substantial  savings in workers'  compensation  costs due to a
reduction in claims and severity,  we continue to experience  higher health care
costs, generally due to market conditions.

            Truck delivery expenses  decreased from $5.5 million in 2003 to $5.2
million in 2004.  Increases  in lease  related  costs were more than offset by a
decrease  in  insurance  and repair  costs.  In  addition,  we have been able to
minimize the impact of increased fuel costs and variable lease costs  associated
with truck usage by continuing to improve efficiencies in the timing and routing
of deliveries.  Unscheduled  deliveries in 2004 improved over the same period in
2003 by 16.3%  while  total miles  driven  increased  by just 1.4% on an average
customer base that  increased by 8.2%. In addition,  improvements  in our safety
record  during 2004 have  resulted in a  significant  reduction in the amount of
workers' compensation and vehicle accident claims expense.

            Occupancy and shop costs related to cost of products sold  decreased
from $3.2 million in 2003 to $3.1 million in 2004. The  improvement is primarily
the result of strategic  relocation of targeted depots,  improved  insurance and
communication costs.

COST OF EQUIPMENT RENTALS, EXCLUDING DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

            Cost of equipment rentals,  excluding depreciation and amortization,
decreased  by $1.1  million  from $3.5  million in 2003 to $2.3 million in 2004,
while deceasing as a percentage of equipment  rental revenue from 12.3% to 7.6%.
The  reduction  in cost of equipment  rentals  reflected in expense is primarily
attributable  to a greater  percentage of costs being  capitalized in connection
with  our  bulk  CO2  systems  due to  increased  efficiency  of  our  technical
installers and the number of new  activations.  In addition,  occupancy and shop
costs related to cost of equipment  rentals  decreased from $2.0 million in 2003
to $1.6 million in 2004, as we continue to realize savings in tank refurbishment
and repair costs.

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

            Selling,  general  and  administrative  expenses  decreased  by $1.8
million from $17.5 million in 2003 to $15.7 million in 2004, while decreasing as
a percentage of total revenues from 23.5% in 2003 to 19.4% in 2004.

            Selling  related  expenses  decreased  by $0.2  million,  from  $3.5
million in 2003 to $3.3 million in 2004,  primarily  the result of a decrease in
wages and related  benefits  due to a reduction  in the  headcount  of our sales
organization in February 2003.  During the fourth quarter of 2004, we have begun
to  increase  our  sales   force,   primarily   by  adding   independent   sales
representatives,  to take  advantage of  opportunities  for growth in the market
place.

            General and administrative  expenses  decreased by $1.6 million,  or
10.8%,  from $14.0 million in 2003 to $12.4 million in 2004. This improvement is
due to a $0.8 million  reduction in executive wages, a $0.5 million reduction in
expenses related to uncollectible accounts receivable,  a $0.2 million reduction
in outside  contract  labor,  and a $0.7  million  reduction in  consulting  and
professional   fees.   These  were  offset  by  a  $0.3   million   increase  in
administrative wages,  primarily related to achieving incentive related targets,
and $0.3 million in other  general  expenses.  During  fiscal 2003, we initiated
numerous procedures to improve our review and collection of outstanding accounts
receivable.  Consulting  fees  decreased,  primarily due to  non-recurring  fees
incurred  during the first  seven  months of fiscal  2003 for repairs of certain
systems,   improvements   in  our  processes  to  track  and  collect   customer
receivables, and other process improvements.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

            Depreciation and  amortization  decreased from $17.2 million in 2003
to $15.2 million in 2004. As a percentage of total  revenues,  depreciation  and
amortization expense decreased from 23.1% in 2003 to 18.8% in 2004.

            Depreciation  expense  decreased from $13.8 million in 2003 to $13.2
million in 2004.  As we  continue  with our plan to  replace  all 50 and 100 lb.
tanks over the next two years,  depreciation  expense  from these  tanks,  whose
expected  useful lives were  shortened to coincide  with the  replacement  plan,
resulted in depreciation expense of $0.9 million in 2004, down from $1.2 million
in 2003. In addition, certain costs associated with the initial direct placement
of bulk CO2 customer sites,  which are capitalized,  are fully  depreciated upon
the completion of the initial contract term, and upon contract renewal,  no such
costs are incurred.

                                       26



            Amortization  expense  decreased  from $3.4  million in 2003 to $2.0
million in 2004.  This  decrease is due to a reduction  in the  amortization  of
deferred charges from our current  financing  arrangements  effective August 25,
2003 as compared to the  amortization of fees related to our previous  financing
arrangements,  and to the  amortization  of customer  lists,  many of which were
fully amortized as of March 31, 2003.

LOSS ON ASSET DISPOSAL

            Loss on asset  disposal  decreased from $1.7 million in 2003 to $1.2
million in 2004, while decreasing as a percentage of total revenues from 2.2% to
1.6%.

OPERATING INCOME

            For the reasons previously discussed,  operating income increased by
$9.9 million from $2.5 million in 2003 to $12.4 million in 2004. As a percentage
of total revenues, operating income improved from 3.4% in 2003 to 15.4% in 2004.

LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT

            In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, we accelerated  the recognition
of $1.5 million in deferred  financing costs  associated with the refinancing of
our  long-term  debt.  In  addition,  we  accelerated  the  recognition  of  the
unamortized  portion of the  Original  Issue  Discount  associated  with our 12%
Senior  Subordinated  Promissory Notes,  $0.4 million,  and paid $0.1 million in
conjunction with the early termination of an interest rate swap agreement.

UNREALIZED LOSS ON FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT

            In order to reduce our exposure to increases in Eurodollar  interest
rates, and consequently to increases in interest  payments,  on October 2, 2003,
we entered into an interest rate swap  transaction (the "Swap") in the amount of
$20.0 million (the "Notional  Amount") with an effective date of March 15, 2004.
Pursuant  to the  Swap,  we pay a fixed  interest  rate of 2.12%  per  annum and
receive  a  Eurodollar-based  floating  rate.  The  effect  of  the  Swap  is to
neutralize any changes in Eurodollar rates on the Notional  Amount.  As the Swap
was not effective until March 15, 2004 and no cash flows were exchanged prior to
that date,  the Swap did not meet the  requirements  to be  designated as a cash
flow hedge.  As such,  an  unrealized  loss of $177,000  was  recognized  in our
results of  operations  during the nine months ended March 31, 2004,  reflecting
the change in fair value of the Swap from inception to the effective date. As of
March 15, 2004,  the Swap met the  requirements  to be designated as a cash-flow
hedge and is deemed a highly effective transaction.

INTEREST EXPENSE

            Interest expense increased from $7.5 million in 2003 to $7.9 million
in 2004,  while  decreasing as a percentage of total revenues from 10.0% in 2003
to 9.8% in 2004. The effective  interest rate of our debt increased from 9.8% to
11.4% per annum, primarily due to the terms of our refinancing in August 2003.

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES

            See discussion of Net Income (Loss).

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

            As of June 30, 2004, we had net  operating  loss  carryforwards  for
federal  income tax  purposes  of  approximately  $108.9  million  and for state
purposes  in varying  amounts,  which are  available  to offset  future  taxable
income,  if any, in varying amounts through June 2024. If an "ownership  change"
for federal income tax purposes were to occur in the future,  our ability to use
our pre-ownership change federal and state net operating loss carryforwards (and
certain built-in losses, if any) would be subject to an annual usage limitation,
which under  certain  circumstances  may prevent us from being able to utilize a
portion  of such loss  carryforwards  in future tax  periods  and may reduce our
after-tax cash flow. In addition,  a portion of our taxable income is subject to
the AMT,  which is reflected in our statements of operations for 2004 along with
a provision for state income taxes.  Our provisions for income taxes in 2004 was
$0.1  million.  No provision  was made for income tax expense in 2003 due to our
net loss.

                                       27



NET INCOME (LOSS)

            For the reasons  described above, net income (loss) improved by $7.1
from a $4.9 million net loss in 2003 to net income of $2.2 million in
2004.

EBITDA

            Earnings  before  interest,  taxes,  depreciation  and  amortization
("EBITDA")  is one of the principal  financial  measures by which we measure our
financial  performance.  EBITDA is a widely accepted financial indicator used by
many  investors,  lenders and  analysts to analyze and compare  companies on the
basis of  operating  performance,  and we believe  that EBITDA  provides  useful
information  regarding  our ability to service  our debt and other  obligations.
However,  EBITDA does not represent cash flow from  operations,  nor has it been
presented as a substitute to operating income or net income as indicators of our
operating  performance.  EBITDA excludes significant costs of doing business and
should not be  considered  in  isolation  or as a  substitute  for  measures  of
performance prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.  In addition,  our calculation of EBITDA may be
different  from  the  calculation  used  by  our   competitors,   and  therefore
comparability  may be  affected.  In  addition,  our lenders  also use EBITDA to
assess our compliance with debt covenants.  These financial  covenants are based
on a  measure  that  is not  consistent  with  accounting  principles  generally
accepted in the United States of America. Such measure is EBITDA (as defined) as
modified by certain defined adjustments.

            EBITDA, as set forth in the table below (in thousands), increased by
$7.9 million,  or 40.2%, from $19.7 million in 2003 to $27.6 million in 2004 and
increased as a percentage of total revenues from 26.5% to 34.2%.

                                                       Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
                                                      ---------------------------
                                                         2004            2003
                                                      ---------       ----------
Net income (loss)                                      $  2,180        $ (4,939)
Interest expense                                          7,947           7,487
Depreciation and amortization                            15,234          17,167
Provision for income taxes                                  142            --
Unrealized loss on financial instrument                     177            --
Loss on early extinguishment of debt                      1,964            --
                                                       --------        --------
EBITDA                                                 $ 27,644        $ 19,715
                                                       ========        ========

Cash flows provided by (used in):
  Operating activities                                 $ 21,657        $ 15,826
  Investing activities                                 $(16,595)       $(13,891)
  Financing activities                                 $ (5,012)       $ (3,042)

 RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

            In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB")
issued SFAS No. 145, "RESCISSION OF FASB STATEMENTS NO. 4, 44, AND 64, AMENDMENT
OF FASB STATEMENT NO. 13, AND TECHNICAL  CORRECTIONS"  ("SFAS 145"). Among other
things, SFAS 145 rescinds the provisions of SFAS No. 4 that require companies to
classify  certain gains and losses from debt  extinguishments  as  extraordinary
items.   The  provisions  of  SFAS  145  related  to   classification   of  debt
extinguishments  are  effective for fiscal years  beginning  after May 15, 2002.
Gains and losses from extinguishment of debt will be classified as extraordinary
items only if they meet the criteria in APB Opinion No. 30 ("APB 30"); otherwise
such losses will be  classified  as a component  of  continuing  operations.  We
adopted SFAS 145 during the quarter ended September 30, 2002.

            In  December  2002,  FASB  issued  SFAS  No.  148,  "ACCOUNTING  FOR
STOCK-BASED  COMPENSATION - TRANSITION AND  DISCLOSURE"  ("SFAS 148").  SFAS 148
amends SFAS No. 123, "ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED  COMPENSATION" ("SFAS 123"), to
provide  alternative  methods of transition  for a voluntary  change to the fair
value based method of  accounting  for  stock-based  employee  compensation.  In
addition,  SFAS 148 amends the  disclosure  requirements  of SFAS 123 to require
prominent  disclosure in both annual and interim financial  statements about the
method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the
method used on the reported  results.  The  provisions of SFAS 148 are effective
for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The

                                       28



adoption  of SFAS  148 had no  impact  on our  financial  position,  results  of
operations or cash flows for the periods presented.

            In  December  2004,  FASB  revised  SFAS No.  123,  "ACCOUNTING  FOR
STOCK-BASED  COMPENSATION" through the issuance of SFAS NO. 123-R,  "SHARE-BASED
PAYMENTS" ("SFAS 123-R").  SFAS 123-R supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, "ACCOUNTING
FOR STOCK ISSUED TO EMPLOYEES," and its related  implementation  guidance.  SFAS
123-R  requires  all  share-based  payments to  employees,  including  grants of
employee stock options, to be recognized in the statement of operations based on
their fair value and vesting schedule.  However,  SFAS 123-R does not change the
accounting guidance for share-based payment transactions with parties other than
employees  provided in SFAS 123 as  originally  issued and EITF Issue No. 96-18,
"ACCOUNTING FOR EQUITY  INSTRUMENTS  THAT ARE ISSUED TO OTHER THAN EMPLOYEES FOR
ACQUIRING,  OR IN  CONJUNCTION  WITH SELLING,  GOODS OR SERVICES." We will adopt
SFAS 123-R  effective with the fiscal  quarter  beginning July 1, 2005, at which
time,  pro forma  disclosure of net income and earnings per share will no longer
be an alternative to recognition in the statement of operations.

            In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, "AMENDMENT OF STATEMENT
133 ON DERIVATIVE  INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING  ACTIVITIES"  ("SFAS 149").  SFAS 149
amends  and  clarifies   financial   accounting  and  reporting  for  derivative
instruments,   including  certain  derivative   instruments  embedded  in  other
contracts  (collectively  referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities
under SFAS No. 133. SFAS 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified
after June 30, 2003, and designated hedges after June 30, 2003, except for those
provisions of SFAS 149 which relate to SFAS No. 133  implementation  issues that
have been  effective for fiscal  quarters that began prior to June 15, 2003. For
those issues,  the provisions that are currently in effect should continue to be
applied in  accordance  with their  respective  effective  dates.  In  addition,
certain  provisions of SFAS 149,  which relate to forward  purchases or sales of
when-issued  securities  or other  securities  that do not yet exist,  should be
applied to both existing contracts and new contracts entered into after June 30,
2003. The adoption of SFAS 149 had no material impact on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.

            On  July  1,  2003,  we  adopted  EITF  Issue  No.  00-21,  "REVENUE
ARRANGEMENTS WITH MULTIPLE  DELIVERABLES"  ("EITF 00-21").  EITF 00-21 addresses
certain aspects of the accounting by a vendor for  arrangements  under which the
vendor will perform multiple revenue generating activities. As of June 30, 2005,
approximately  65,000 of our customer  locations  utilized a plan agreement that
provides for a fixed monthly payment to cover the use of a bulk CO2 system and a
predetermined maximum quantity of CO2 ("budget plan"). Prior to July 1, 2003, as
lessor,  we  recognized  revenue from leasing CO2 systems  under our budget plan
agreements on a straight-line basis over the life of the related leases. We have
developed a  methodology  for the purpose of separating  the  aggregate  revenue
stream  between the rental of the equipment  and the sale of the CO2.  Effective
July  1,  2003,  revenue  attributable  to the  lease  of  equipment,  including
equipment  leased under the budget plan,  is recorded on a  straight-line  basis
over the term of the lease and  revenue  attributable  to the  supply of CO2 and
other gases,  including  CO2 provided  under the budget plan,  is recorded  upon
delivery to the customer.

            We  elected to apply EITF  00-21  retroactively  to all budget  plan
agreements in existence as of July 1, 2003. Based on our analysis, the aggregate
amount of CO2 actually  delivered  under  budget plans during the quarter  ended
June 30, 2003 was not materially different than the corresponding portion of the
fixed charges attributable to CO2. Accordingly, we believe the cumulative effect
of the adoption of EITF 00-21 as of July 1, 2003 was not significant.

            Under the budget plan,  each  customer  has a maximum CO2  allowance
that is measured and reset on the contract anniversary date. At that date, it is
appropriate  to  record  revenue  for  contract  billings  in  excess  of actual
deliveries  of CO2.  Because of the large number of  customers  under the budget
plan and the fact that the anniversary dates for determining  maximum quantities
are spread  throughout the year, our  methodology  involves the use of estimates
and assumptions to separate the aggregate  revenue stream derived from equipment
rentals to budget plan  customers,  and also to approximate  the  recognition of
revenue from CO2 sales to budget plan customers  upon delivery.  We believe that
the adoption of EITF 00-21 has the most impact on the  recognition of revenue on
a quarterly basis as CO2 usage fluctuates  during a fiscal year based on factors
such as weather, and traditional summer and holiday periods. Over a twelve-month
period, we believe that the effect is less significant since seasonal variations
are largely  eliminated  and CO2  allowances  under budget plan  agreements  are
measured and reset annually.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

            Our  cash   requirements   consist   principally   of  (1)   capital
expenditures  associated  with  purchasing and placing new bulk CO2 systems into
service  at  customers'  sites;  (2)  payments  of  principal  and  interest  on
outstanding indebtedness; and (3) working capital. Whenever possible, we seek to
obtain the use of  vehicles,  land,  buildings,  and other  office  and  service

                                       29



equipment under operating leases as a means of conserving capital. We anticipate
making cash capital  expenditures  of  approximately  $30.0 million for internal
growth over the next twelve months,  primarily for purchases of bulk CO2 systems
for new customers,  the  replacement  with larger bulk CO2 systems of 50 and 100
lb. bulk CO2 systems in service at existing  customers and replacement units for
our truck fleet.  In June 2002,  we adopted a plan to replace all 50 and 100 lb.
bulk CO2 systems in service at customers over a three to four year period. While
this decision may not increase  revenues  generated from these customers,  it is
expected to improve  operating  efficiencies,  gross margins and  profitability.
Once bulk CO2 systems are placed into service, we generally  experience positive
cash  flows  on a  per-unit  basis,  as there  are  minimal  additional  capital
expenditures required for ordinary operations.

            In addition to capital  expenditures  related to internal growth, we
review opportunities to acquire bulk CO2 service accounts,  and may require cash
in an  amount  dictated  by the scale  and  terms of any such  transactions.  On
October 1, 2004,  we  purchased  the bulk CO2 beverage  carbonation  business of
privately-owned Pain Enterprises, Inc., of Bloomington,  Indiana, for total cash
consideration  of $15.7 million.  The  transaction  involved the  acquisition of
approximately  9,000 customer accounts,  including  approximately 6,300 tanks in
service,  vehicles,  parts, and supplies.  Pain  Enterprises'  bulk CO2 beverage
carbonation business operated in 12 Midwestern and Southeastern states: Florida,
Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Minnesota, Ohio,
Tennessee and Wisconsin.

LONG TERM DEBT

            On  September  24,  2001,  we entered  into a $60.0  million  second
amended  and  restated  revolving  credit  facility  with a  syndicate  of banks
("Amended  Credit  Facility").  On August 25, 2003,  we  terminated  the Amended
Credit  Facility and entered into a $50.0 million senior credit  facility with a
syndicate of banks (the "Senior Credit  Facility").  The Senior Credit  Facility
initially consisted of a $30.0 million A term loan facility (the "A Term Loan"),
a $10.0 million B term loan  facility  (the "B Term Loan"),  and a $10.0 million
revolving loan facility (the "Revolving Loan Facility").  On October 1, 2004, in
conjunction  with the Pain  Enterprises,  Inc.  transaction,  the Senior  Credit
Facility was amended to, among other  things,  increase the B Term Loan to $23.0
million and to modify certain financial covenants. The A Term Loan and Revolving
Loan Facility  were due to mature on August 25, 2007,  while the B Term Loan was
due to mature on August 25, 2008. We were  entitled to select either  Eurodollar
Loans (as defined) or Base Rate Loans (as defined),  plus applicable margin, for
principal  borrowings  under the Senior Credit Facility.  Applicable  margin was
determined by a pricing grid based on our Consolidated  Total Leverage Ratio (as
defined).  Interest  was payable  periodically  on  borrowings  under the Senior
Credit  Facility.  In addition,  commencing on December 31, 2003 and on the last
day of each quarter thereafter, we were required to make principal repayments on
the A Term Loan in  increasing  amounts and on December 31, 2004 and on the last
day of each quarter  thereafter,  we were required to make principal payments on
the B Term Loan in the amount of  $57,500  until  August  25,  2008 when we were
required to make a final payment of $22,137,500.  The Senior Credit Facility was
collateralized  by all of our  assets.  Additionally,  we  were  precluded  from
declaring or paying any cash dividends.

            We were also  required  to meet  certain  affirmative  and  negative
covenants, including but not limited to financial covenants. We were required to
assess our compliance  with these  financial  covenants  under the Senior Credit
Facility on a quarterly basis. These financial covenants were based on a measure
that is not consistent  with  accounting  principles  generally  accepted in the
United States of America. Such measure is EBITDA (as defined),  which represents
earnings before  interest,  taxes,  depreciation  and  amortization,  as further
modified by certain defined  adjustments.  The failure to meet these  covenants,
absent a waiver or amendment, would have placed us in default and cause the debt
outstanding  under the Senior  Credit  Facility  to  immediately  become due and

                                       30



payable.  We were in  compliance  with all  covenants  under the  Senior  Credit
Facility  as of  September  30,  2003  and  all  subsequent  quarters  up to and
including March 31, 2005.

            In connection with the  termination of the Amended Credit  Facility,
during the first  quarter of fiscal 2004,  we  recognized a loss of $0.9 million
from the write-off of unamortized  financing  costs  associated with the Amended
Credit Facility and recorded $2.3 million in financing costs associated with the
Senior Credit  Facility.  Such costs were being  amortized  over the life of the
Senior Credit Facility.

            On May 27,  2005,  we  terminated  the Senior  Credit  Facility  and
entered into a $60.0  million  revolving  credit  facility with Bank of America,
N.A. (the "2005 Credit  Facility").  The 2005 Credit Facility matures on May 27,
2010.  We are  entitled  to select  either  Base  Rate  Loans  (as  defined)  or
Eurodollar  Rate Loans (as  defined),  plus  applicable  margin,  for  principal
borrowings under the 2005 Credit Facility.  Applicable margin is determined by a
pricing grid based on our Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined) as follows:

               Pricing      Consolidated Leverage       Eurodollar Rate     Base Rate
                Level             Ratio                     Loans             Loans
               ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                  I         Greater than or equal to       2.250%            0.750%
                            2.50x
               ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                 II         Less than 2.50x but greater    2.000%            0.500%
                            than or equal to 2.00x
               ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                III         Less than 2.00x but greater    1.750%            0.250%
                            than or equal to 1.50x
               ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                 IV         Less than 1.50x but greater    1.500             0.000%
                            than or equal to 0.50x
               ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                  V         Less than 0.50x                1.250%            0.000%
               ----------------------------------------------------------------------

            Interest is payable periodically on borrowings under the 2005 Credit
Facility. The 2005 Credit Facility is uncollateralized.  We are required to meet
certain affirmative and negative covenants,  including financial  covenants.  We
are required to assess our compliance with these  financial  covenants under the
2005 Credit Facility on a quarterly basis.  These financial  covenants are based
on a  measure  that  is not  consistent  with  accounting  principles  generally
accepted in the United  States of America.  Such measure is EBITDA (as defined),
which represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,
as further  modified by certain defined  adjustments.  The failure to meet these
covenants, absent a waiver or amendment, would place us in default and cause the
debt outstanding  under the 2005 Credit Agreement to immediately  become due and
payable. We were in compliance with all covenants under the 2005 Credit Facility
as of June 30, 2005.

            In connection  with the  termination of the Senior Credit  Facility,
during the fourth  quarter of fiscal 2005,  we recognized a loss of $1.7 million
from the write-off of unamortized  financing  costs  associated  with the Senior
Credit Facility and recorded $0.4 million in financing costs associated with the
2005 Credit  Facility.  Such costs are being amortized over the life of the 2005
Credit Facility.

            As of June  30,  2005,  a total  of $32.0  million  was  outstanding
pursuant to the 2005 Credit  Facility with a weighted  average  interest rate of
4.8% per annum.

SUBORDINATED DEBT

            In  October  1997,  we  issued  $30.0  million  of  our  12%  Senior
Subordinated   Promissory  Notes  ("1997  Notes")  with  interest  only  payable
semi-annually  on April 30 and October 31, due October 31, 2004. On May 4, 1999,
we sold an additional  $10.0 million of our 12% Senior  Subordinated  Promissory
Notes ("1999 Notes").  Except for their October 31, 2005 maturity date, the 1999
Notes were substantially identical to the 1997 Notes. As of June 30, 2002 and at

                                       31




various  dates in the past we have been unable to meet certain  covenants  under
the 1997 Notes and 1999 Notes and have had to obtain  waivers or  modifications.
On September 27, 2002,  concurrently  with the  amendment to the Amended  Credit
Facility,  certain  financial  covenants  of the 1997  Notes and 1999 Notes were
amended to adjust  certain  financial  covenants  for the quarter ended June 30,
2002,  and  prospectively.  On February 7, 2003,  the  interest  coverage  ratio
governing the 1997 Notes and 1999 Notes was amended for the quarter ending March
31, 2003 and  prospectively.  As of March 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003, we were in
compliance  with all of the  financial  covenants  under the 1997 Notes and 1999
Notes.

            On August  25,  2003,  concurrently  with the  closing of the Senior
Credit  Facility,  we prepaid  the 1997  Notes and 1999  Notes and issued  $30.0
million of our 16.3% Senior  Subordinated  Notes Due February 27, 2009 (the "New
Notes") with interest only payable  quarterly in arrears on February 28, May 31,
August 31 and November 30 of each year,  commencing  November 30, 2003. Interest
on the New Notes was 12% per annum  payable  in cash and 4.3% per annum  payable
"in kind" by adding the amount of such interest to the  principal  amount of the
New Notes then  outstanding.  Ten year  warrants  to purchase  an  aggregate  of
425,000  shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.79 per share were
issued in connection with the New Notes.  Utilizing the Black-Scholes Model, the
warrants  issued  in  connection  with the New  Notes  were  valued at $3.70 per
warrant, or an aggregate value of $1,573,000.  In addition, the maturity date of
665,403  existing  warrants,  335,101  due to expire in 2004 and  330,302 due to
expire in 2005, was extended to February 2009,  resulting in additional value of
$1.31 and $0.97 per warrant, respectively, or an aggregate value of $760,090. At
the date of issuance,  in accordance  with APB 14,  "ACCOUNTING  FOR CONVERTIBLE
DEBT AND DEBT ISSUED WITH  PURCHASE  WARRANTS,"  we allocated  proceeds of $27.7
million  to the  debt and  $2.3  million  to the  warrants,  with the  resulting
discount on the debt referred to as the Original  Issue  Discount.  The Original
Issue  Discount  was being  amortized  as interest  expense over the life of the
debt.  As with the Senior  Credit  Facility,  we were  required to meet  certain
affirmative  and  negative  covenants  under the New  Notes,  including  but not
limited to financial  covenants.  We were in compliance with all covenants under
the New Notes as of  September  30, 2003 and all  subsequent  quarters up to and
including March 31, 2005.

            In  connection  with the early  repayment of the 1997 Notes and 1999
Notes,  during the first  quarter of fiscal  2004 we  recognized  a loss of $1.1
million  attributable  to the  unamortized  financing  costs and original  issue
discount  associated  with the 1997  Notes and 1999  Notes,  and  recorded  $0.6
million of  financing  costs and original  issue  discount  associated  with New
Notes.  Such fees  were  being  amortized  over the life of the New  Notes.  The
weighted  average  effective  interest  rate of the  New  Notes,  including  the
amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount,  was 18.0%
per annum.

            On April 4, 2005, we used $34.3 million of the net proceeds from the
sale of 2,041,713 shares of our common stock in an underwritten  public offering
in March 2005 to redeem the New Notes at 106% of the original  principal  amount
plus accrued interest.  In addition,  during the quarter ended June 30, 2005, we
recognized a loss on the early termination of debt associated with the New Notes
of  approximately   $4.1  million,   which  includes  the  prepayment   penalty,
unamortized fees and the amortized portion of the original issue discount.

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

            On March 30, 2005, we sold  2,041,713  shares of our common stock in
an underwritten  public  offering.  Based on the public offering price of $24.17
per  share and after  deducting  underwriting  discounts  and  commissions,  net
proceeds were  approximately  $46.6  million.  On March 31, 2005, we reduced the
outstanding  principal amount of the Senior Credit Facility by $11.2 million and
on April 4, 2005, we used  approximately  $34.3 million of the net proceeds from
the offering to redeem all of the New Notes.

            In May  2000,  we  sold  5,000  shares  of  Series  A 8%  Cumulative
Convertible  Preferred Stock, no par value (the "Series A Preferred Stock"), for
$1,000 per share.  Shares of the Series A Preferred Stock were  convertible into
shares of common stock at any time at a conversion  price of $9.28 per share. In
addition,  in  November  2001,  we sold 2,500  shares of Series B 8%  Cumulative
Convertible  Preferred Stock, no par value (the "Series B Preferred Stock"), for
$1,000 per share.  Shares of the Series B Preferred Stock were  convertible into
shares of common  stock at any time at a  conversion  price of $12,92 per share.
Effective  August 18, 2004, the holder of the Series A Preferred Stock converted
its shares into 754,982 shares of our common stock.  Effective December 7, 2004,
the holder of the Series B Preferred  Stock  converted  its shares into  247,420
shares of our common stock.

            During the fiscal year ended June 30,  2005,  our capital  resources
included cash flows from  operations,  available  borrowing  capacity  under the
Senior Credit Facility and 2005 Credit Facility and the net proceeds of the sale
of  2,041,713  shares of our common  stock in March 2005.  We believe  that cash
flows from  operations and available  borrowings  under the 2005 Credit Facility
will be  sufficient  to fund  proposed  operations  for at least the next twelve
months.

                                       32




            The  table  below  sets  forth  our   contractual   obligations  (in
thousands):

                                                               Less than
Contractual Obligations                       Total               1 Year        2-3 Years           4-5 Years           Thereafter
-----------------------                    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 Credit Facility
   Principal                                $ 32,000            $    -           $     -            $ 32,000                $   -
   Interest                                    8,000              1,600             3,200              3,200                    -
                                            --------            -------          --------             ------                ------
Total 2005 Credit Facility                   40,000               1,600             3,200             35,200                    -
                                            --------            -------          --------             ------                ------

Employment agreements                         2,359               1,167               972                220                    -
Operating leases                             15,522               4,656             7,032              3,499                  335
                                           --------             -------          --------           --------                ------
Total obligations                          $ 57,881             $ 7,423          $ 11,204           $ 38,919                $ 335
                                           ========             =======          ========           ========                ======

            In addition,  in May 1997,  we entered  into an  exclusive  bulk CO2
requirements contract with The BOC Group, Inc., which expires in May 2011.

            WORKING  CAPITAL.  At June 30, 2005 we had working  capital of $11.2
million  compared to a working capital deficit of $4.6 million at June 30, 2004.
Improvements in working capital were due to improvements  from  operations,  the
reversal of the net deferred tax asset valuation  allowance,  the replacement of
the Senior Credit  Facility with the 2005 Credit  Facility  under more favorable
terms, and the redemption of the Subordinated Notes.

            CASH  FLOWS  FROM  OPERATING  ACTIVITIES.  Cash  flows  provided  by
operations increased by $8.0 million from $21.7 million in 2004 to $29.7 million
in 2005.  The  improvement  is primarily  due to our  improvement  in net income
(excluding  non-cash  charges) of $8.6  million,  while cash used by the working
capital  components of our balance sheet  increased by $0.6 million from 2004 to
2005.

            During 2003, we enacted a deliberate  plan to strengthen  cash flows
generated by operations by improvements  to operating  income and the management
of working capital assets. For example, improvements were made in the collection
of  our  outstanding  accounts  receivable,  primarily  the  result  of  process
improvements.  While we  continue  to make  improvements  in the  management  of
working capital assets, the most dramatic  improvement was seen prior to the end
of fiscal 2003, as compared to 2002. In contrast, an increase in working capital
assets from 2004 to 2005 was directly  attributable  to growth in customer sales
from approximately 18,000 account activations and customer acquisitions,  offset
by a reduction of amounts placed in escrow by contractual  requirements with our
business insurance  carrier,  the majority of which is refundable upon continued
favorable claims experience.

            CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES. During 2005 and 2004, net cash
used in investing activities was $38.8 million and $16.6 million,  respectively.
Investing  activities in 2005 included $15.7 million paid for the acquisition of
the bulk CO2 beverage carbonation business of Pain Enterprises, Inc. and related
acquisition expenses on October 1, 2004. Such purchase price was allocated among
tangible assets,  intangible assets,  and goodwill as follows:  $6.7 million for
tangible  assets,  $6.2  million  for  intangible  assets and $2.8  million  for
goodwill.  In  addition,  we acquired  certain  bulk CO2  customer  accounts and
equipment  from  Coca-Cola  Enterprises,  Inc. on June 30, 2005 for $1.4 million
allocated  as follows:  $1.0 million was  allocated to tangible  assets and $0.4
million for intangible  assets.  Exclusive of acquisition  purchases,  investing
activities  are primarily  attributable  to the  acquisition,  installation  and
direct placement costs of bulk CO2 systems.

            CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES. During fiscal 2005, cash flows
provided by financing  activities was $9.6 million compared to $5.0 million used
in financing activities in 2004.

            During fiscal 2005,  concurrent with the acquisition of the bulk CO2
beverage carbonation business of Pain Enterprises,  Inc., the B Term Loan of our
Senior  Credit  Facility was  increased by $13.0  million from $10.0  million to
$23.0 million.  In addition,  on March 30, 2005, we sold 2,041,713 shares of our
common stock in an underwritten  public  offering.  Based on the public offering
price of  $24.17  per  share  and after  deducting  underwriting  discounts  and
commissions,  net proceeds were approximately  $46.6 million. On March 31, 2005,
we reduced the  outstanding  principal  amount of the Senior Credit  Facility by
$11.2 million and on April 4, 2005, we used  approximately  $34.3 million of the
net proceeds from the offering to redeem all of the New Notes.

                                       33



            During  fiscal 2004,  we  terminated  the Amended  Credit  Facility,
retired the 1997 Notes and 1999 Notes,  entered into the Senior Credit  Facility
and issued the New Notes.

            In 2003, we completed the private  placement of 1,663,846  shares of
our  common  stock to 24  accredited  investors  at a price of $9.75  per  share
realizing net cash proceeds of approximately $15.1 million after $1.1 million of
issuance costs.  Pursuant to the requirements of the Amended Credit Facility, we
used  $14.5  million  of the  proceeds  to pay down  outstanding  debt under the
Amended Credit Facility.

INFLATION

            The modest  levels of  inflation  in the  general  economy  have not
affected  our  results  of  operations.  Additionally,  our  customer  contracts
generally  provide  for annual  increases  in the  monthly  rental rate based on
increases in the consumer price index. We believe that inflation will not have a
material adverse effect on our future results of operations.

            Our bulk CO2  exclusive  requirements  contract  with The BOC Group,
Inc. ("BOC") provides for annual  adjustments in the purchase price for bulk CO2
based upon  increases or decreases in the Producer  Price Index for Chemical and
Allied Products or the average percentage  increase in the selling price of bulk
merchant  carbon  dioxide  purchased  by BOC's  large,  multi-location  beverage
customers in the United States, whichever is less.

            As of June 30, 2005, we operated a total of 295 specialized bulk CO2
delivery  vehicles and technical  service vehicles that logged  approximately 13
million miles in fiscal 2005. While significant  increases in fuel prices impact
our operating costs,  such impact is largely offset by fuel surcharges billed to
the majority of our customers.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND SIGNIFICANT ESTIMATES

            In  preparing  our   financial   statements,   we  make   estimates,
assumptions  and judgments  that can have a  significant  impact on our revenue,
operating  income and net income,  as well as on the reported amounts of certain
assets and  liabilities  on our balance  sheet.  We believe that the  estimates,
assumptions and judgments  involved in the accounting  policies  described below
have the greatest potential impact on our financial  statements,  so we consider
these to be our critical accounting  policies.  Estimates in each of these areas
are based on historical  experience and a variety of assumptions that we believe
are appropriate. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 VALUATION OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

            We review our long-lived assets for impairment, principally property
and equipment,  whenever  events or changes in  circumstances  indicate that the
carrying  amount  of the  assets  may not be  fully  recoverable.  To  determine
recoverability of our long-lived assets, we evaluate the probability that future
undiscounted  net cash  flows will be greater  than the  carrying  amount of our
assets.  Impairment  is measured  based on the  difference  between the carrying
amount of our assets and their estimated fair value.

            Certain events may occur that would materially  affect our estimates
and assumptions  related to  depreciation.  Unforeseen  changes in operations or
technology could  substantially  alter  management's  assumptions  regarding our
ability  to  realize  the  return of our  investment  in  operating  assets  and
therefore  affect the amount of  depreciation  expense  to charge  against  both
current  and future  revenues.  Because  depreciation  expense is a function  of
historical  experiences,  analytical studies and professional  judgments made of
property,  plant and  equipment,  subsequent  studies  could result in different
estimates of useful lives and net salvage values. If future depreciation studies
yield  results  indicating  that our assets  have  shorter  lives as a result of
obsolescence,  physical  condition,  changes  in  technology  or  changes in net
salvage values, the estimate of depreciation  expense could increase.  Likewise,
if studies  indicate that assets have longer lives, the estimate of depreciation
expense could decrease.  For the year ended June 30, 2005,  depreciation expense
was $13.8 million  representing  17.5% of operating  expenses.  If the estimated
lives of all assets being  depreciated were increased by one year,  depreciation
expense would have decreased by approximately $0.9 million or 6.7%.  Conversely,
if the estimated lives of all assets decreased by one year, depreciation expense
would have increased by $1.1 million or 7.7%.

            Goodwill  represents  the cost in  excess  of the fair  value of the
tangible and  identifiable  intangible  net assets of  businesses  acquired and,
prior to July 1, 2001,  was amortized on a  straight-line  method over 20 years.
Effective July 1, 2001, we adopted Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards
No. 142, "GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS," pursuant to which, goodwill and
indefinite  life  intangible  assets are no longer  amortized but are subject to
annual impairment  tests.  Other intangible assets with finite lives continue to
be amortized  on a  straight-line  method over the periods of expected  benefit.
Other   intangible   assets  consist  of  customer  lists  and   non-competition

                                       34



agreements,  principally acquired in connection with certain asset acquisitions.
Customer  lists are being  amortized on a straight  line method over five to ten
years, and non-competition agreements,  which generally preclude the other party
from competing with us in a designated  geographical area for a stated period of
time, are being amortized on a straight line method over their contractual lives
which range from thirty to one hundred and twenty months.

RESERVES FOR UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

            We make ongoing  assumptions  relating to the  collectability of our
accounts  receivable.  The  accounts  receivable  amount  on our  balance  sheet
includes  a reserve  for  accounts  that  might  not be paid.  Such  reserve  is
evaluated and adjusted on a monthly basis by examining our historical losses and
collections experience,  aging of our trade receivables, the creditworthiness of
significant customers based on ongoing evaluations,  and current economic trends
that might impact the level of credit losses in the future.  The  composition of
receivables consists of on-time payers,  "slow" payers, and at risk receivables,
such as  receivables  from  customers  who no longer do  business  with us,  are
bankrupt, or are out of business. While we believe that our current reserves are
adequate to cover potential  credit losses,  we cannot predict future changes in
the  financial  stability  of our  customers  and we cannot  guarantee  that our
reserves will continue to be adequate. If actual credit losses are significantly
greater than the reserve we have  established,  that would  increase our general
and administrative expenses and reduce our reported net income.  Conversely,  if
actual  credit  losses  are  significantly  less than our  reserve,  this  would
eventually  decrease  our general and  administrative  expenses and increase our
reported net income.

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES

            Deferred  income taxes  reflect the net tax effects of net operating
loss  carryforwards  and temporary  differences  between the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for
income  tax  purposes.  Our  deferred  tax  assets  include  the  benefit of net
operating loss  carryforwards  incurred through June 30, 2005. While we attained
profitability  during fiscal year 2004, based on the consideration of all of the
available evidence including the recent history of losses,  management concluded
as of June 30, 2004 that it was more likely than not that the net  deferred  tax
assets would not be  realized.  Accordingly,  we recorded a valuation  allowance
equal to the amount of our net deferred tax assets at that time.

            However,  as of June 30, 2005, after  consideration of all available
positive  and  negative  evidence,  we  concluded  that the  deferred  tax asset
relating to our net operating  loss  carryforwards  will more likely than not be
realized in the future.  Thus, the entire  valuation  allowance was reversed and
reported as a component of the fiscal 2005 income tax provision.  In considering
whether or not a  valuation  allowance  was  appropriate  at June 30,  2005,  we
considered several aspects, including, but not limited to the following items:

     o      Cumulative  pretax book income during the three years ended June 30,
            2005

     o      Both positive and negative evidence as to our ability to utilize our
            federal net operating loss carry forwards prior to expiration,  such
            as current and projected  generation of taxable income, our position
            in the  market  place  (servicing  approximately  70%  of  customers
            currently  utilizing  bulk  CO2),  existence  of long term  customer
            contracts  (generally  for five to six  years in  duration),  growth
            opportunities  and  conversion of  restaurants  currently  utilizing
            high-pressure CO2 to beverage grade bulk CO2

     o      Future reversals of taxable temporary differences

     o      Tax  planning  strategies,  including  the option of an  alternative
            method of depreciating assets for tax purposes

     o      The refinancing of our senior borrowing facilities at more favorable
            terms  and  conditions  and  the  retirement  of  our  16.3%  Senior
            Subordinated  Notes,  lowering our cost of  borrowing  from 10.5% to
            4.8%

            In future years we will continue to evaluate  whether or not our net
deferred  tax assets will be fully  realized.  Should it become more likely than
not that all or a portion of the net  deferred  tax assets  will not be realized
prior to expiration, a valuation allowance will be recorded.

                                       35




7A.         QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

            As  discussed  under   "Management's   Discussion  and  Analysis  of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources"
above, as of June 30, 2005, a total of $32.0 million was  outstanding  under the
2005 Credit Facility with a weighted  average  interest rate of 4.8%. Based upon
the $32.0 million  outstanding  under the 2005 Credit Facility at June 30, 2005,
our annual  interest cost under the 2005 Credit  Facility would increase by $0.3
million for each 1% increase in Eurodollar interest rates.

            In order to reduce our exposure to increases in Eurodollar  interest
rates, and consequently to increases in interest  payments,  on October 2, 2003,
we entered into an interest rate swap  transaction (the "Swap") in the amount of
$20.0 million (the "Notional  Amount") with an effective date of March 15, 2004.
Pursuant  to the  Swap,  we pay a fixed  interest  rate of 2.12%  per  annum and
receive  a  Eurodollar-based  floating  rate.  The  effect  of  the  Swap  is to
neutralize any changes in Eurodollar rates on the Notional Amount. We do not, on
a routine basis,  enter into  speculative  derivative  transactions or leveraged
swap  transactions,  except as disclosed.  As the Swap was not  effective  until
March 15, 2004 and no cash flows were exchanged prior to that date, the Swap did
not meet the  requirements  to be designated  as a cash flow hedge.  As such, an
unrealized  loss of $177,000 was recognized in our results of operations for the
nine months  ended March 31,  2004,  reflecting  the change in fair value of the
Swap from  inception to the effective  date. As of March 15, 2004,  the Swap met
the  requirements  to be  designated as a cash flow hedge and is deemed a highly
effective transaction.

8.          FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

            See page F-1.

9.          CHANGES IN AND  DISAGREEMENTS  WITH  ACCOUNTANTS  ON ACCOUNTING  AND
            FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

            None.

 9A.        CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

            EVALUATION  OF  DISCLOSURE  CONTROLS  AND  PROCEDURES.  Based on our
 management's  evaluation  (with the  participation  of our principal  executive
 officer and principal financial  officer),  as of the end of the period covered
 by this report, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer
 have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
 (the "Exchange  Act") are effective to ensure that  information  required to be
 disclosed  by us in reports  that we file or submit  under the  Exchange Act is
 recorded, processed,  summarized and reported within the time periods specified
 in SEC rules and forms.

            CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL  REPORTING.  There was no
change in our internal control over financial reporting during our fourth fiscal
quarter that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting. As part of our evaluation
and testing of internal  control over financial  reporting  under Section 404 of
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we strengthened internal controls over financial
reporting by providing for greater segregation of duties in key areas, improving
adherence to our procedures and guidelines, and improving our ability to monitor
and audit information systems activities.

            MANAGEMENT'S  REPORT ON INTERNAL  CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL  REPORTING.
Under Section 404 of The  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our management is required
to assess the  effectiveness  of the Company's  internal  control over financial
reporting  as of  the  end of  each  fiscal  year  and  report,  based  on  that
assessment,  whether the Company's internal control over financial  reporting is
effective.

            Management  of the  Company  is  responsible  for  establishing  and
maintaining  adequate internal control over financial  reporting.  The Company's
internal  control over  financial  reporting  is designed to provide  reasonable
assurance as to the  reliability  of the Company's  financial  reporting and the
preparation  of financial  statements for external  purposes in accordance  with
generally accepted accounting principles.

            Internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  no  matter  how well
designed, has inherent limitations.  Therefore,  internal control over financial
reporting  determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to  financial  statement  preparation  and may not prevent or detect all
misstatements.  Moreover,  projections  of any  evaluation of  effectiveness  to
future  periods  are  subject to the risk that  controls  may become  inadequate
because of  changes in  conditions,  or that the degree of  compliance  with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.

                                       36



            The  Company's  management  has  assessed the  effectiveness  of the
Company's  internal  control over  financial  reporting as of June 30, 2005.  In
making  this  assessment,  the  Company  used  the  criteria  of the  Integrated
Framework  adopted by the Committee of Sponsoring  Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). These criteria are in the areas of control environment,  risk
assessment,  control  activities,  information and communication and monitoring.
The Company's assessment included extensive documenting,  evaluating and testing
the design and operating  effectiveness  of its internal  control over financial
reporting.

            Based on the Company's processes and assessment, as described above,
management  has  concluded  that, as of June 30, 2005,  the  Company's  internal
control over financial reporting was effective.

            Margolin,  Winer & Evens LLP, the registered  public accounting firm
that has  audited the  Company's  financial  statements  included in this annual
report has issued their  attestation  report on  management's  assessment of the
Company's internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.

9B.         OTHER INFORMATION.

            Not applicable.

10.         DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.

            The information  required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference to
our  definitive  proxy  statement to be filed with the SEC no later than October
28, 2005 pursuant to Regulation 14A.

11.         EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

            The information  required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference to
our  definitive  proxy  statement to be filed with the SEC no later than October
28, 2005 pursuant to Regulation 14A.

12.         SECURITY  OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN  BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
            RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

            The information  required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference to
our  definitive  proxy  statement to be filed with the SEC no later than October
28, 2005 pursuant to Regulation 14A.

13.         CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

            The information  required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference to
our  definitive  proxy  statement to be filed with the SEC no later than October
28, 2005 pursuant to Regulation 14A.

14.         PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

            The information  required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference to
our  definitive  proxy  statement to be filed with the SEC no later than October
28, 2005 pursuant to Regulation 14A.

15.         EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

            (a) The following documents are filed as part of this report.

            (1) Financial statements.
                See Index to  Financial  Statements  which  appears  on page F-1
                herein.

            (2) Financial Statement Schedules

                II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

            (3) Exhibits:

                                       37




            Exhibit No.         Exhibit
            -----------         -------

            3.1           --    Amended and Restated  Articles of  Incorporation
                                of the Company. (2)

            3.2           --    Articles  of   Amendment   to  the  Articles  of
                                Incorporation of the Company, dated December 18,
                                1995. (3)

            3.3           --    Articles  of   Amendment   to  the  Articles  of
                                Incorporation of the Company, dated December 17,
                                1996. (3)

            3.4           --    Articles  of   Amendment   to  the  Articles  of
                                Incorporation  of the  Company,  dated  May  10,
                                2000. (4)

            3.5           --    Articles  of   Amendment   to  the  Articles  of
                                Incorporation of the Company,  dated November 1,
                                2001. (5)

            3.6           --    Articles  of   Amendment   to  the  Articles  of
                                Incorporation  of the  Company,  dated March 31,
                                2003. (9)

            3.7           --    Articles  of   Amendment   to  the  Articles  of
                                Incorporation of the Company, dated December 10,
                                2003. (10)

            3.8           --    Bylaws of the Company. (10)

            4             --    Rights  Agreement,  dated as of March 27,  2003,
                                between  the  Company  and   Continental   Stock
                                Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent. (8)

            10.1*         --    1995 Stock Option Plan of the Company. (10)

            10.2*         --    Directors'  Stock  Option  Plan of the  Company.
                                (11)

            10.3          --    Credit Agreement dated as of May 27, 2005, among
                                the Company, each lender from time to time party
                                thereto   and   Bank  of   America,   N.A.,   as
                                Administrative  Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C
                                Issuer. (12)

            10.4          --    Asset Purchase  Agreement dated October 1, 2004,
                                by and between the Company and Pain Enterprises,
                                Inc. (13)

            10.5          --    Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 22,
                                2002,   by  and  between  the  Company  and  the
                                purchasers named therein. (7)

            10.6          --    Registration Right Agreement, dated as of August
                                22,  2002,  by and  between  the Company and the
                                selling shareholders named therein. (6)

            10.7*         --    Amended  and   Restated   Employment   Agreement
                                between  the  Company  and  Michael  DeDomenico,
                                effective as of August 10, 2004. (11)

            10.8*         --    Employment  Agreement  between  the  Company and
                                William  Scott Wade,  dated as of May 13,  2002.
                                (7)

            10.9*         --    Amendment  dated  December 9, 2004 to Employment
                                Agreement by and between the Company and William
                                Scott Wade. (14)

            10.10*        --    Employment  Agreement  between  the  Company and
                                Robert R. Galvin,  dated as of October 21, 2002.
                                (9)

            10.11*        --    Amendment  dated  December 9, 2004 to Employment
                                Agreement  by and between the Company and Robert
                                R. Galvin. (14)

                                       38




            10.12*        --    Letter  Agreement  dated December 9, 2004 by and
                                between the Company and Eric M. Wechsler. (14)

            10.13*        --    Employment  Agreement  between  the  Company and
                                John E. Wilson, dated as of June 6, 2005. (15)

            10.14*        --    Stock Option  Agreement  between the Company and
                                Robert L. Frome dated March 21, 2003. (9)

            10.15*        --    Stock Option  Agreement  between the Company and
                                Daniel Raynor dated March 21, 2003. (9)

            10.16*        --    Stock Option  Agreement  between the Company and
                                Robert L. Frome dated March 21, 2003. (9)

            10.17*        --    Stock Option  Agreement  between the Company and
                                Daniel Raynor dated March 21, 2003. (9)

            10.18*        --    Stock Option  Agreement  between the Company and
                                Daniel Raynor dated September 11, 2003. (11)

            10.19*        --    Stock Option  Agreement  between the Company and
                                Robert L. Frome dated September 11, 2003. (11)

            10.20*        --    Stock Option  Agreement  between the Company and
                                J. Robert Vipond dated April 5, 2004. (11)

            14            --    Code of Ethics. (9)

            23            --    Consent  of  Margolin,  Winer & Evens LLP to the
                                incorporation  by  reference  to  the  Company's
                                Registration   Statements   on  Form  S-8  (Nos.
                                333-06705,  333-30042, 333-89096 and 333-114898)
                                and Form S-3 (No.  333-99201) of the independent
                                registered   public   accounting  firm's  report
                                included herein. (1)

            31.1          --    Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive
                                Officer. (1)

            31.2          --    Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial
                                Officer. (1)

            32.1          --    Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive
                                Officer. (1)

            32.2          --    Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial
                                Officer. (1)

            *  Indicates  a  management   contract  or   compensation   plan  or
arrangement.
---------------------------

(1)    Included herein.
(2)    Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
       SB-2,  filed with the Commission on November 7, 1995 (Commission File No.
       33-99078), as amended.
(3)    Incorporated  by reference to the Company's  Form 10-K for the year ended
       June 30, 1998.
(4)    Incorporated  by reference to the Company's  Form 10-K for the year ended
       June 30, 2000.
(5)    Incorporated  by  reference  to the  Company's  Form 10-Q for the quarter
       ended December 31, 2001.
(6)    Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on From
       S-3, filed with the Commission on September 5, 2002  (Commission File No.
       333- 99201).
(7)    Incorporated  by reference to the Company's  Form 10-K for the year ended
       June 30, 2002.
(8)    Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
       8-A, filed on March 31, 2003.
(9)    Incorporated  by reference to the Company's  Form 10-K for the year ended
       June 30, 2003.
(10)   Incorporated  by  reference  to the  Company's  Form 10-Q for the quarter
       ended December 31, 2003.
(11)   Incorporated  by reference to the Company's  Form 10-K for the year ended
       June 30, 2004.
(12)   Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated May 27, 2005.

                                       39





(13)   Incorporated  by reference  to the  Company's  Form 8-K dated  October 1,
       2004.
(14)   Incorporated  by reference to the  Company's  Form 8-K dated  December 8,
       2004.
(15)   Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated June 6, 2005.

                                       40





                                   SIGNATURES

            Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of  Section  13  or  15(d)  of  the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                            NUCO2 INC.

Dated:  September 13, 2005                  /s/ Michael E. DeDomenico
                                            -------------------------
                                            Michael E. DeDomenico
                                            Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following  persons on behalf of the  Registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 Signature                              Title                       Date
 ---------                              -----                       ----


 /s/ Michael E. DeDomenico       Director,                    September 13, 2005
 --------------------------      Chief Executive Officer
 Michael E. DeDomenico


 /s/ Robert L. Frome             Director                     September 13, 2005
 ------------------------
 Robert L. Frome


 /s/ Steven J. Landwehr          Director                     September 13, 2005
 ----------------------
 Steven J. Landwehr


 /s/ Daniel Raynor               Director                     September 13, 2005
 -----------------
 Daniel Raynor


 /s/ J. Robert Vipond            Director                     September 13, 2005
 --------------------
 J. Robert Vipond


 /s/ Christopher White           Director                     September 13, 2005
 ---------------------
 Christopher White


 /s/ Robert R. Galvin            Chief Financial Officer      September 13, 2005
 --------------------
 Robert R. Galvin

                                       41



                          INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


                                                                                Page No.
                                                                                --------

                                   NUCO2 INC.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.......................    F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Controls..    F-3

Financial Statements:

        Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 and 2004...........................    F-4

        Statements of Operations for the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2005,
            2004 and 2003.....................................................    F-5

        Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Fiscal Years Ended
            June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003......................................    F-6

        Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2005,
            2004 and 2003.....................................................    F-7

Notes to Financial Statements.................................................    F-9

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Fiscal Years Ended
            June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003......................................    F-29

                                      F-1




             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
NuCO2 Inc.
Stuart, Florida

We have  audited the  accompanying  balance  sheets of NuCO2 Inc. as of June 30,
2005 and 2004, and the related statements of operations,  shareholders'  equity,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2005. We
have also audited the financial  statement  schedule listed in the  accompanying
index.  These financial  statements and schedule are the  responsibility  of the
Company's  management.  Our  responsibility  is to  express  an opinion on these
financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance  with the standards of the Public  Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a
test basis,  evidence  supporting  the amounts and  disclosures in the financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant  estimates  made by  management,  as well as evaluating  the overall
financial  statement  presentation.   We  believe  that  our  audits  provide  a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,  the financial  statements  referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects,  the financial position of NuCO2 Inc. as of June 30, 2005
and 2004,  and the results of its  operations and its cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended June 30, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted  accounting  principles.  Also, in our opinion,  the related  financial
statement schedule when considered in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein.

As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements,  effective July 1, 2003, the
Company changed the manner in which it accounts for multiple deliverable revenue
arrangements as a result of the adoption of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No.
00-21.

We also have  audited,  in accordance  with the standards of the Public  Company
Accounting  Oversight Board (United States),  the effectiveness of the Company's
internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2005, based on criteria
established in INTERNAL CONTROL--INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK ISSUED BY THE COMMITTEE OF
SPONSORING  ORGANIZATIONS OF THE TREADWAY COMMISSION and our report dated August
17, 2005, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

As discussed in Note 19 to the financial statements, the Company's June 30, 2005
balance  sheet  reported  noncurrent  deferred tax assets of  $39,321,000  and a
noncurrent  deferred tax liability of $24,198,000.  The noncurrent  deferred tax
assets and  liability  should have been  netted.  Accordingly,  the deferred tax
assets should have been reported as $15,123,000  and no noncurrent  deferred tax
liability should have been reported. The financial statements have been restated
to reflect the correction of this error.

                                              MARGOLIN, WINER & EVENS LLP



Garden City, New York
August 17, 2005, except for Note 19,
as to which the date is February 21, 2006

                                      F-2




  REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL CONTROLS

To the Board of Director and Shareholders
NuCO2 Inc.
Stuart, Florida

We  have  audited   management's   assessment,   included  in  the  accompanying
Management's  Report on Internal Controls over Financial  Reporting,  that NuCO2
Inc.  maintained  effective internal control over financial reporting as of June
30,  2005,  based  on  criteria  established  in  INTERNAL   CONTROL--INTEGRATED
FRAMEWORK  ISSUED BY THE COMMITTEE OF SPONSORING  ORGANIZATIONS  OF THE TREADWAY
COMMISSION  (COSO).  The Company's  management is  responsible  for  maintaining
effective  internal  control over financial  reporting and for its assessment of
the   effectiveness   of  internal   control  over  financial   reporting.   Our
responsibility  is to  express  an opinion  on  management's  assessment  and an
opinion on the  effectiveness  of the Company's  internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.

We conducted  our audit in accordance  with the standards of the Public  Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain  reasonable  assurance  about whether  effective
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  was  maintained  in all  material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting,  evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating
the design and operating  effectiveness of internal control, and performing such
other  procedures as we considered  necessary in the  circumstances.  We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's  internal control over financial  reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable  assurance  regarding the reliability of financial  reporting
and the preparation of financial  statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over
financial  reporting  includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the  maintenance  of records that, in reasonable  detail,  accurately and fairly
reflect the  transactions  and  dispositions  of the assets of the company;  (2)
provide  reasonable  assurance  that  transactions  are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting  principles,  and that receipts and  expenditures  of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of  unauthorized  acquisition,  use, or  disposition  of the company's
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent  limitations,  internal control over financial reporting
may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate  because of changes in  conditions,  or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion,  management's  assessment that NuCO2 Inc.  maintained  effective
internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2005, is fairly stated,
in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also in our opinion, NuCO2
Inc.  maintained,  in all material  respects,  effective  internal  control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2005, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have  audited,  in accordance  with the standards of the Public  Company
Accounting  Oversight Board (United States),  the balance sheet of NuCO2 Inc. as
of June 30, 2005 and the  related  statements  of  operations,  cash flows,  and
changes in  shareholders'  equity  for the year then ended and our report  dated
August 17, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

                                       MARGOLIN, WINER & EVENS LLP

Garden City, New York
August 17, 2005

                                      F-3





                                                             NUCO2 INC.
                                                           BALANCE SHEETS
                                                (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                                               ASSETS
                                                               ------
                                                                                               June 30,
                                                                                     -------------------------------

                                                                                          2005              2004*
                                                                                     -----------        -----------
Current assets:
    Cash and cash equivalents                                                        $       968        $       505
    Trade accounts receivable; net of allowance for doubtful
        accounts of $1,850 and $2,095, respectively                                        8,568              6,141
    Inventories                                                                              259                226
    Prepaid insurance expense and deposits                                                 1,281              2,193
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                                854                685
    Deferred tax assets - current portion                                                  7,596               --
                                                                                     -----------        -----------

        Total current assets                                                              19,526              9,750
                                                                                     -----------        -----------

Property and equipment, net                                                              104,787             92,969
                                                                                     -----------        -----------

Other assets:
    Goodwill, net                                                                         22,094             19,222
    Deferred financing costs, net                                                            402              2,178
    Customer lists, net                                                                    5,760                 41
    Non-competition agreements, net                                                          836                703
    Deferred lease acquisition costs, net                                                  4,429              3,458
    Deferred tax assets                                                                   15,123               --
    Other assets                                                                             175                181
                                                                                     -----------        -----------
                                                                                          48,819             25,783
                                                                                     -----------        -----------
        Total assets                                                                 $   173,132        $   128,502
                                                                                     ===========        ===========

                                                LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
                                                ------------------------------------
Current liabilities:
    Current maturities of long-term debt                                             $      --          $     6,048
    Accounts payable                                                                       5,178              4,579
    Accrued expenses                                                                         608                483
    Accrued insurance                                                                        596                430
    Accrued interest                                                                         112                440
    Accrued payroll                                                                        1,464              2,030
    Other current liabilities                                                                366                343
                                                                                     -----------        -----------
        Total current liabilities                                                          8,324             14,353

Long-term debt, excluding current maturities                                              32,000             30,962
Subordinated debt                                                                           --               29,163
Customer deposits                                                                          3,624              3,247
                                                                                     -----------        -----------
        Total liabilities                                                                 43,948             77,725
                                                                                     -----------        -----------

Commitments and contingencies
Redeemable preferred stock                                                                  --               10,021
Shareholders' equity:
    Preferred  stock;  no par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized;
      issued and outstanding 0 shares at June 30, 2005
      and 7,500 shares at June 30, 2004                                                     --                 --
    Common stock; par value $.001 per share; 30,000,000 shares authorized;
        issued and outstanding 15,300,905 shares at June 30, 2005 and 10,840,831
        at June 30, 2004                                                                      15                 11
    Additional paid-in capital                                                           159,040             96,185
    Accumulated deficit                                                                  (30,113)           (55,704)
    Accumulated other comprehensive income                                                   242                264
                                                                                     -----------        -----------
        Total shareholders' equity                                                       129,184             40,756
                                                                                     -----------        -----------
                                                                                     $   173,132        $   128,502
                                                                                     ===========        ===========


See accompanying notes to financial statements.

*Restated to conform to current year presentation.

                                                                F-4



                                   NUCO2 INC.
                            STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

                                                                       Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
                                                                  ---------------------------------
                                                                     2005        2004*       2003*
                                                                     ----        -----       -----

Revenues:
              Product sales                                       $ 61,602    $ 49,900   $ 45,833
              Equipment rentals                                     35,738      30,936     28,576
                                                                  --------    --------   --------
Total revenues                                                      97,340      80,836     74,409
                                                                  --------    --------   --------

Costs and expenses:
              Cost of products sold, excluding depreciation
                    and amortization                                41,147      33,883     32,047
              Cost of equipment rentals, excluding depreciation
                    and amortization                                 2,522       2,345      3,513
              Selling, general and administrative expenses          17,020      15,722     17,484
              Depreciation and amortization                         16,484      15,234     17,167
              Loss on asset disposal                                 1,332       1,242      1,650
                                                                  --------    --------   --------
                                                                    78,505      68,426     71,861
                                                                  --------    --------   --------

Operating income                                                    18,835      12,410      2,548

Loss on early extinguishment of debt                                 5,817       1,964       --
Unrealized loss on financial instrument                               --           177       --
Interest expense                                                     6,985       7,947      7,487
                                                                  --------    --------   --------

Income (loss) before income taxes                                    6,033       2,322     (4,939)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes                          (19,558)        142       --
                                                                  --------    --------   --------
Net income (loss)                                                 $ 25,591    $  2,180   $ (4,939)
                                                                  ========    ========   ========

Weighted average number of common and common
      equivalent shares outstanding
              Basic                                                 12,808      10,689     10,396
                                                                  ========    ========   ========
              Diluted                                               14,295      11,822     10,396
                                                                  ========    ========   ========

Net income (loss) per basic share                                 $   1.98    $   0.13   $  (0.54)
                                                                  ========    ========   ========
Net income (loss) per diluted share                               $   1.79    $   0.12   $  (0.54)
                                                                  ========    ========   ========


See accompanying notes to financial statements.
*Restated to conform to current year presentation.

                                      F-5



                                   NUCO2 INC.
                       STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
                      (In thousands, except share amounts)


                                                                                  Additional
                                                                                    Paid-In      Accumulated
                                                              Common Stock          Capital        Deficit
                                                        -----------------------     -------      -----------
                                                          Shares         Amount
                                                          ------         ------
Balance, June 30, 2002                                  8,969,059    $         9  $    78,584    $   (52,945)
Comprehensive (loss):
       Net (loss)                                            --             --           --           (4,939)
       Other comprehensive income:
          Interest rate swap transaction                     --             --           --             --

Total comprehensive (loss)
Redeemable preferred stock dividend                          --             --           (706)          --
Issuance of 500 shares of common stock -
       exercise of options                                    500           --              6           --
Issuance of 1,663,846 shares of common stock            1,663,846              2       15,054           --
                                                      -----------    -----------  -----------    -----------

Balance, June 30, 2003                                 10,633,405             11       92,938        (57,884)

Comprehensive income:
       Net income                                            --             --           --            2,180
       Other comprehensive income:
          Interest rate swap transaction, including
            reclassification adjustment of $86               --             --           --             --

Total comprehensive income
Redeemable preferred stock dividend                          --             --           (763)          --
Issuance of 425,000 warrants to purchase
       shares of common stock                                --             --          1,573           --
Extension of 665,403 warrants to purchase
       shares of common stock                                --             --            760           --
Issuance of 107,331 shares of common stock --
       exercise of warrants                               107,331           --            675           --
Issuance of 100,095 shares of common stock ---
       exercise of options                                100,095           --          1,002           --
                                                      -----------    -----------  -----------    -----------
Balance, June 30, 2004                                 10,840,831             11       96,185        (55,704)
Comprehensive income:
  Net income                                                 --             --           --           25,591
  Other comprehensive (loss):
    Interest rate swap transaction                           --             --           --             --

Total comprehensive income
Conversion of 5,000 shares of Redeemable
       Preferred Stock                                    754,982              1        7,006           --
Conversion of 2,500 shares of Redeemable
       Preferred Stock                                    247,420           --          3,196           --
Issuance of 953,285 shares of common stock -
       exercise of warrants                               953,285              1          742           --
Issuance of 462,674 shares of common stock -
       exercise of options                                462,674           --          3,500           --
Tax effect of disqualifying dispositions -
       exercise of options                                   --             --          3,080           --
Issuance of 2,041,713 shares of common stock            2,041,713              2       45,513           --
Redeemable preferred stock dividend                          --             --           (182)          --
                                                      -----------    -----------  -----------    -----------
Balance, June 30, 2005                                 15,300,905    $      15    $   159,040    $   (30,113)
                                                      ===========    ===========  ===========    ===========


See accompanying notes to financial statements.

                                                                F-6


                                                          Accumulated
                                                             Other            Total
                                                         Comprehensive     Shareholders'
                                                         Income (loss)        Equity
                                                         -------------     -------------

Balance, June 30, 2002                                 $      (429)   $    25,219
Comprehensive (loss):
       Net (loss)                                             --           (4,939)
       Other comprehensive income:
          Interest rate swap transaction                       300            300
                                                                      -----------
Total comprehensive (loss)                                                 (4,639)
Redeemable preferred stock dividend                           --             (706)
Issuance of 500 shares of common stock -
       exercise of options                                    --                6
Issuance of 1,663,846 shares of common stock                  --           15,056
                                                       -----------    -----------
Balance, June 30, 2003                                        (129)        34,936

Comprehensive income:
       Net income                                             --            2,180
       Other comprehensive income:
          Interest rate swap transaction, including
            reclassification adjustment of $86                 393            393
                                                                      -----------
Total comprehensive income                                                  2,573
Redeemable preferred stock dividend                           --             (763)
Issuance of 425,000 warrants to purchase
       shares of common stock                                 --            1,573
Extension of 665,403 warrants to purchase
       shares of common stock                                 --              760
Issuance of 107,331 shares of common stock --
       exercise of warrants                                   --              675
Issuance of 100,095 shares of common stock ---
       exercise of options                                    --            1,002
                                                       -----------    -----------
Balance, June 30, 2004                                         264         40,756
Comprehensive income:
  Net income                                                  --           25,591
  Other comprehensive (loss):
    Interest rate swap transaction                             (22)           (22)
                                                                      -----------
Total comprehensive income                                                 25,569
Conversion of 5,000 shares of Redeemable
       Preferred Stock                                        --            7,007
Conversion of 2,500 shares of Redeemable
       Preferred Stock                                        --            3,196
Issuance of 953,285 shares of common stock -
       exercise of warrants                                   --              743
Issuance of 462,674 shares of common stock -
       exercise of options                                    --            3,500
Tax effect of disqualifying dispositions -
       exercise of options                                    --            3,080
Issuance of 2,041,713 shares of common stock                  --           45,515
Redeemable preferred stock dividend                           --             (182)
                                                       -----------    -----------
Balance, June 30, 2005                                 $       242    $   129,184
                                                       ===========    ===========


See accompanying notes to financial statements.

                                      F-6a




                                   NUCO2 INC.
                            STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)


                                                                            Years Ended June 30,
                                                                            --------------------
                                                                      2005         2004*      2003*
                                                                    --------     -------    ---------

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)                                                   $ 25,591    $  2,180    $ (4,939)
   Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
      provided by operating activities:
          Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment     13,751      13,255      13,836
          Amortization of other assets                                 2,733       1,979       3,331
          Amortization of original issue discount                        318         406         210
          Paid-in-kind interest                                        1,014       1,107        --
          Loss on asset disposal                                       1,332       1,242       1,650
          Loss on early extinguishment of debt                         5,817       1,964        --
          Change in net deferred tax asset                           (19,638)       --          --
          Unrealized loss on financial instrument                       --           177        --
          Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
              Decrease (increase) in:
                  Trade accounts receivable                           (2,427)         76         954
                  Inventories                                            (33)        (16)         25
                  Prepaid insurance expense and deposits                 912      (1,119)       (460)
                  Prepaid expenses and other current assets             (191)       (188)        821
              Increase (decrease) in:
                  Accounts payable                                       599         483         743
                  Accrued expenses                                       201         229        (855)
                  Accrued insurance                                      166        (155)          0
                  Accrued payroll                                       (566)        381         203
                  Accrued interest                                      (328)       (413)       (198)
                  Other current liabilities                               23          13         (42)
                  Customer deposits                                      377          56         547
                                                                    --------    --------    --------

              Net cash provided by operating activities               29,651      21,657      15,826
                                                                    --------    --------    --------

Cash flows from investing activities:
   Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment                     --             1          19
   Purchase of property and equipment                                (19,371)    (14,962)    (12,752)
   Increase in non-competition agreements                               --          --          (160)
   Increase in deferred lease acquisition costs                       (2,244)     (1,624)     (1,125)
   Acquisition of businesses                                         (17,172)       --          --
   Decrease (increase) in other assets                                     6         (10)        127
                                                                    --------    --------    --------

              Net cash used in investing activities                 $(38,781)   $(16,595)   $(13,891)
                                                                    --------    --------    --------

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
*Restated to conform to current year presentation.

                                      F-7





                                   NUCO2 INC.
                            STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
                                   (CONTINUED)

                                                                                          Years Ended June 30,
                                                                                          --------------------
                                                                                    2005         2004*       2003*
                                                                                  --------     --------      ----


Cash flows from financing activities:
   Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
      and subordinated debt and warrants                                           $ 59,350    $ 74,150    $   --
   Repayment of long-term debt and subordinated debt                                (98,281)    (78,094)    (17,340)
   Proceeds from issuance of common stock                                            46,632        --        16,222
   Issuance costs - common stock                                                     (1,117)       --        (1,168)
   Increase in deferred financing costs                                              (1,234)     (2,745)       (762)
   Exercise of options and warrants                                                   4,243       1,677           6
                                                                                   --------    --------    --------

              Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities                     9,593      (5,012)     (3,042)
                                                                                   --------    --------    --------

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                                        463          50      (1,107)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year                                            505         455       1,562
                                                                                   --------    --------    --------

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year                                             $    968    $    505    $    455
                                                                                   ========    ========    ========

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid during the year for:

      Interest                                                                     $  5,981    $  6,760    $  7,475
                                                                                   ========    ========    ========

      Income taxes                                                                 $    125    $     80    $      -
                                                                                   ========    ========    ========

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:

            In 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company increased the carrying amount of
the  redeemable  preferred  stock by $182,  $763,  and $706,  respectively,  for
dividends that were not paid and accordingly  reduced additional paid-in capital
by a like amount.





See accompanying notes to financial statements.
*Restated to conform to current year presentation.

                                      F-8



                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

         (a)   DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

               NuCO2 Inc. (the  "Company") is a supplier of bulk CO2  dispensing
systems to customers in the food, beverage,  lodging and recreational industries
in the United States.

         (b)   CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

               The  Company   considers  all  highly  liquid  debt   instruments
purchased  with  an  original  maturity  of  three  months  or  less  to be cash
equivalents. The Company maintains cash balances with a financial institution in
an amount that exceeds the federal government deposit insurance.

         (c)   INVENTORIES

               Inventories,  consisting  primarily  of carbon  dioxide  gas, are
stated at the  lower of cost or  market.  Cost is  determined  by the  first-in,
first-out method.

         (d)   PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

               Property and  equipment  is stated at cost.  The Company does not
depreciate bulk systems held for  installation  until the systems are in service
and leased to customers.  Upon  installation,  the systems,  component parts and
direct costs  associated  with the  installation  are  transferred to the leased
equipment account.  These direct costs are associated with successful placements
of such systems with customers under noncancelable contracts and which would not
be incurred by the Company but for a successful  placement.  Upon early  service
termination,  the  unamortized  portion  of  direct  costs  associated  with the
installation are expensed.  Depreciation and amortization are computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets or
the lease terms for leasehold improvements, whichever is shorter.

               The depreciable lives of property and equipment are as follows:

                                                      Estimated Life
                                                      --------------
         Leased equipment                               5-20 years
         Equipment and cylinders                        3-20 years
         Vehicles                                       3-5 years
         Computer equipment                             3-7 years
         Office furniture and fixtures                  5-7 years
         Leasehold improvements                         lease term

         (e)   GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

               Goodwill, net of accumulated  amortization of $5,006,  represents
the cost in excess of the fair value of the tangible and identifiable intangible
net assets of businesses acquired and, prior to July 1, 2001, was amortized on a
straight-line method over 20 years.  Effective July 1, 2001, the Company adopted
Statement  of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  No.  142,  "GOODWILL  AND OTHER
INTANGIBLE  ASSETS," pursuant to which,  goodwill and indefinite life intangible
assets are no longer amortized but are subject to annual impairment tests. Other
intangible  assets with finite lives continue to be amortized on a straight-line
method over the periods of expected  benefit.  The  Company's  other  intangible
assets consist of customer  lists and  non-competition  agreements,  principally
acquired in 1995 through 1998 and during 2005 in  connection  with certain asset
acquisitions.  Customer lists are being amortized on a straight-line method over
five to ten years, and non-competition agreements,  which generally preclude the
other party from  competing with the Company in a designated  geographical  area
for a stated period of time, are being amortized on a straight-line  method over
their  contractual  lives  which  range from  thirty to one  hundred  and twenty
months.  Non-competition  agreements  also include an agreement  entered into in
January 2001, for $480, with the Company's  former Chief  Executive  Officer and
Chairman  of the  Board  of  Directors,  precluding  this  former  officer  from
competing with the Company for a period of five years.

                                      F-9




                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

         (f)   IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

               Long-lived assets,  other than goodwill,  consist of property and
equipment,  customer lists, and  non-competition  agreements.  Long-lived assets
being  retained  for use by the Company are tested for  recoverability  whenever
events or changes in  circumstances  indicate that their carrying values may not
be  recoverable by comparing the carrying value of the assets with the estimated
future  undiscounted  cash flows that are directly  associated with and that are
expected to arise as a direct result of the use and eventual  disposition of the
asset.  Impairment  losses  are  recognized  only if the  carrying  amount  of a
long-lived  asset is not  recoverable  and exceeds the asset's  fair value.  The
impairment  loss would be calculated as the  difference  between asset  carrying
values and the fair value of the asset with fair value generally estimated based
on the present value of the estimated future net cash flows.

               Long-lived assets to be disposed of by abandonment continue to be
classified as held and used until they cease to be used. If the Company  commits
to a plan to  abandon  a  long-lived  asset  before  the  end of its  previously
estimated useful life,  depreciation estimates are revised to reflect the use of
the asset over its shortened useful life. Long-lived assets to be disposed of by
sale that meet certain criteria are classified as held for sale and are reported
at the lower of their carrying amounts or fair values less cost to sell.

         (g)   DEFERRED FINANCING COST, NET

               Financing costs are amortized on a straight-line  method over the
term of the related  indebtedness.  Accumulated  amortization of financing costs
was $14 and $566 at June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

         (h)   DEFERRED LEASE ACQUISITION COSTS, NET

               Deferred lease  acquisition  costs,  net,  consist of commissions
associated  with the  acquisition of new leases and are being amortized over the
life of the  related  leases,  generally  five to six  years on a  straight-line
method.  Accumulated amortization of deferred lease acquisition costs was $6,826
and  $6,079  at June  30,  2005  and  2004,  respectively.  Upon  early  service
termination,  the unamortized  portion of deferred lease  acquisition  costs are
expensed as a component of operating expenses.

         (i)   REVENUE RECOGNITION

               The Company  earns its  revenues  from the leasing of CO2 systems
and related gas sales. The Company,  as lessor,  recognizes revenue from leasing
of CO2 systems over the life of the related  leases.  The majority of CO2 system
agreements  generally include payments for leasing of equipment and a continuous
supply of CO2 until usage reaches a pre-determined  maximum annual level, beyond
which the customer  pays for CO2 on a per pound  basis.  Other CO2 and gas sales
are recorded upon delivery to the customer.

               On July 1, 2003,  the  Company  adopted  EITF  00-21.  EITF 00-21
addresses  certain aspects of the accounting by a vendor for arrangements  under
which the vendor  will  perform  multiple  revenue  generating  activities.  The
Company's bulk CO2 budget plan agreements provide for a fixed monthly payment to
cover the use of a bulk CO2 system and a predetermined  maximum quantity of CO2.
As of June 30, 2005,  approximately  65,000 of the Company's  customer locations
utilized this plan.  Prior to July 1, 2003, the Company,  as lessor,  recognized
revenue  from  leasing  CO2  systems  under  its  budget  plan  agreements  on a
straight-line basis over the life of the related leases. The Company developed a
methodology  for the purpose of separating the aggregate  revenue stream between
the rental of the  equipment  and the sale of the CO2.  Effective  July 1, 2003,
revenue attributable to the lease of equipment, including equipment leased under
the budget plan, is recorded on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease
and revenue  attributable  to the supply of CO2 and other gases,  including  CO2
provided under the budget plan, is recorded upon delivery to the customer.

               The  Company  elected to apply EITF  00-21  retroactively  to all
budget plan  agreements in existence as of July 1, 2003.  Based on the Company's
analysis,  the  aggregate  amount of CO2 actually  delivered  under budget plans
during the quarter  ended June 30, 2003 was not  materially  different  than the
corresponding portion of the fixed charges attributable to CO2. Accordingly, the
Company believes that the cumulative  effect of the adoption of EITF 00-21 as of
July 1, 2003 was not significant.

               Under the budget plan,  each customer has a maximum CO2 allowance
that is measured and reset on the contract anniversary date. At that date, it is
appropriate  to  record  revenue  for  contract  billings  in  excess  of actual

                                      F-10




                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

deliveries  of CO2.  Because of the large number of  customers  under the budget
plan and the fact that the anniversary dates for determining  maximum quantities
are spread throughout the year, the Company's  methodology  necessarily involves
the use of estimates and  assumptions  to separate the aggregate  revenue stream
derived from equipment rentals to budget plan customers, and also to approximate
the  recognition  of  revenue  from CO2  sales to  budget  plan  customers  upon
delivery.  The  Company  believes  that the  adoption of EITF 00-21 has the most
impact  on the  recognition  of  revenue  on a  quarterly  basis  as  CO2  usage
fluctuates  during  a  fiscal  year  based  on  factors  such  as  weather,  and
traditional  summer and holiday periods.  Solely for comparative  purposes,  the
Company  has  separated  equipment  rentals and CO2 sales in the  statements  of
operations  for the year ended June 30, 2003;  however,  the  aggregate  revenue
derived  from  budget  plan  agreements  for those  periods is  recognized  on a
straight-line basis. The Company believes that if the guidance of EITF 00-21 had
been applied  retroactively,  the effect on total revenues and net loss for that
period would be  immaterial  as the impact of applying  EITF 00-21 over a twelve
month period is insignificant as seasonal  variations are largely eliminated and
CO2 allowances under budget plan agreements are measured and reset annually.

         (j)   INCOME TAXES

               Income  taxes  are  accounted  for  under  Financial   Accounting
Standards Board Statement No. 109,  "ACCOUNTING FOR INCOME TAXES." Statement No.
109 requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected
future tax  consequences  of events  that have been  included  in the  financial
statements  or  tax  returns.  Under  this  method,   deferred  tax  assets  and
liabilities  are  determined  based  on the  difference  between  the  financial
statement  and tax bases of assets and  liabilities  using  enacted tax rates in
effect for the year in which the  differences  are  expected to  reverse.  Under
Statement No. 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change
in tax rates is  recognized  in income in the period that includes the enactment
date.

         (k)   NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

               Net income  (loss) per common share is  presented  in  accordance
with SFAS No. 128,  "EARNINGS  PER SHARE."  Basic  earnings  per common share is
computed using the weighted average number of common shares  outstanding  during
the period. Diluted earnings per common share incorporate the incremental shares
issuable  upon the assumed  exercise of stock options and warrants to the extent
they are not anti-dilutive.

         (l)   USE OF ESTIMATES

               The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  conformity  with
generally accepted  accounting  principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions  that affect the reported  amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of  contingent  assets and  liabilities  at the date of the financial
statements  and the  reported  amounts  of  revenues  and  expenses  during  the
reporting  period.  Estimates used when  accounting for items such as allowances
for doubtful  accounts,  depreciation  and  amortization  periods,  valuation of
long-lived  assets  and  income  taxes  are  regarded  by  management  as  being
particularly  significant.  These  estimates and assumptions are evaluated on an
on-going basis and may require adjustment in the near term. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.

         (m)   EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

               On June 1, 1996, the Company adopted a deferred compensation plan
under Section  401(k) of the Internal  Revenue  Code,  which covers all eligible
employees.  Under the  provisions  of the plan,  eligible  employees may defer a
percentage of their compensation subject to the Internal Revenue Service limits.
Contributions  to the plan are made by  employees  and matched at the  Company's
discretion, up to a maximum of 1% of employee's wages.  For the years ended June
30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company contributed $94, $0 and $0, respectively.

         (n)   STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

               At June 30, 2005,  the Company had two  stock-based  compensation
plans which are more fully  described in Note 8. The Company  accounts for these
plans under the recognition  and  measurement  principles of APB Opinion No. 25,
"ACCOUNTING  FOR STOCK ISSUED TO  EMPLOYEES,"  and related  interpretations.  No
stock-based  compensation cost is reflected in net income (loss), as all options
granted under these plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying  common stock on the date of grant.  The following table  illustrates
the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share if the Company had
applied the fair value recognition  provisions of SFAS No. 123,  "ACCOUNTING FOR
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION," to stock-based compensation.

                                      F-11



                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


                                                           Fiscal Years Ended June 30,
                                                       ---------------------------------
                                                         2005        2004         2003
                                                       --------     -------      -------
Net income (loss), as reported                         $ 25,591     $ 2,180      $(4,939)
Less:
   Stock-based compensation
       - fair value measurement                          (2,287)     (1,272)      (1,085)
                                                       --------     -------      -------
Net income (loss), proforma                              23,304         908       (6,024)
Preferred stock dividends                                  (182)       (763)        (706)
                                                       --------     -------      -------
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
   proforma                                            $ 23,122     $   145      $(6,730)
                                                       ========     =======      =======

Basic earnings (loss) per share - reported             $   1.98     $  0.13      $ (0.54)
                                                       ========     =======      =======
Basic earnings (loss) per share - proforma             $   1.81     $  0.01      $ (0.64)
                                                       ========     =======      =======

Diluted earnings (loss) per share - reported           $   1.79     $  0.12      $ (0.54)
                                                       ========     =======      =======
Diluted earnings (loss) per share - proforma           $   1.63     $  0.01      $ (0.64)
                                                       ========     =======      =======



Expected volatility                                     30 - 32%      28 - 40%       40%
Risk free interest rate                               3.6% - 3.7%   2.6% - 3.2%  3.7% - 4.8%
Expected dividend yield                                    0%            0%           0%
Expected lives                                          3-4 years     3-4 years    1-5 years

            In December  2004,  the FASB revised SFAS No. 123,  "ACCOUNTING  FOR
STOCK-BASED  COMPENSATION"  through  the  issuance  of SFAS 123-R  "SHARE  BASED
PAYMENTS"  ("SFAS  123-R").  SFAS  123-R  supersedes  APB  25  and  its  related
implementation  guidance.  SFAS  123-R  requires  all  share-based  payments  to
employees,  including grants of employee stock options,  to be recognized in the
statement of operations based on their fair value and vesting schedule. However,
SFAS 123-R  does not change the  accounting  guidance  for  share-based  payment
transactions  with  parties  other  than  employees  provided  in  SFAS  123  as
originally issued and EITF Issue No. 96-18,  "ACCOUNTING FOR EQUITY  INSTRUMENTS
THAT ARE ISSUED TO OTHER THAN  EMPLOYEES FOR ACQUIRING,  OR IN CONJUNCTION  WITH
SELLING,  GOODS OR SERVICES."  The Company will adopt SFAS 123-R  effective with
the fiscal quarter  beginning July 1, 2005, at which time, pro forma  disclosure
of net  income  and  earnings  per  share,  as  provided,  will no  longer be an
alternative to recognition in the statement of operations.

         (o)   VENDOR REBATES

            Pursuant  to EITF  02-16,  "ACCOUNTING  BY A CUSTOMER  (INCLUDING  A
RESELLER)  FOR  CERTAIN  CONSIDERATION  RECEIVED  FROM A  VENDOR,"  the  Company
recognizes  rebates received from its suppliers of bulk CO2 tanks as a reduction
of  capitalizable  cost.  The Company  received  rebates of $886,  $548 and $393
during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 respectively.

         (p)   TRADE RECEIVABLES AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS

               The Company  invoices  its  customers  on a monthly  basis,  with
payment due within 30 days of the  invoice  date.  The Company  does not provide
discounts for early payment.

               In  conjunction  with  its  trade  receivables  the  Company  has
established a reserve for accounts that might not be  collectible.  Such reserve
is  evaluated  and  adjusted  on a  monthly  basis by  examining  the  Company's
historical  losses,  aging of its trade  receivables,  the  creditworthiness  of
significant customers based on ongoing evaluations,  and current economic trends
that might impact the level of credit losses in the future.  The  composition of
receivables consists of on-time payers,  "slow" payers, and at risk receivables,
such as  receivables  from customers who no longer do business with the Company,
are bankrupt, or are out of business.

                                      F-12




                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

         (q)   RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

               In April 2002, the Financial  Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
issued SFAS No. 145, "RESCISSION OF FASB STATEMENTS NO. 4, 44, AND 64, AMENDMENT
OF FASB STATEMENT NO. 13, AND TECHNICAL  CORRECTIONS"  ("SFAS 145"). Among other
things, SFAS 145 rescinds the provisions of SFAS No. 4 that require companies to
classify  certain gains and losses from debt  extinguishments  as  extraordinary
items.   The  provisions  of  SFAS  145  related  to   classification   of  debt
extinguishments  are  effective for fiscal years  beginning  after May 15, 2002.
Gains and losses from extinguishment of debt will be classified as extraordinary
items only if they meet the criteria in APB Opinion No. 30 ("APB 30"); otherwise
such losses will be  classified  as a component of  continuing  operations.  The
Company adopted SFAS 145 during the quarter ended September 30, 2002.

               In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148,  "ACCOUNTING  FOR
STOCK-BASED  COMPENSATION - TRANSITION AND  DISCLOSURE"  ("SFAS 148").  SFAS 148
amends SFAS No. 123, "ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED  COMPENSATION" ("SFAS 123"), to
provide  alternative  methods of transition  for a voluntary  change to the fair
value based method of  accounting  for  stock-based  employee  compensation.  In
addition,  SFAS 148 amends the  disclosure  requirements  of SFAS 123 to require
prominent  disclosure in both annual and interim financial  statements about the
method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the
method used on the reported  results.  The  provisions of SFAS 148 are effective
for financial  statements  for fiscal years ending after  December 15, 2002. The
adoption of SFAS 148 had no impact on the Company's financial position,  results
of operations or cash flows for the periods presented.

               In April  2003,  the FASB  issued  SFAS No.  149,  "AMENDMENT  OF
STATEMENT 133 ON DERIVATIVE  INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING  ACTIVITIES"  ("SFAS 149").
SFAS 149 amends and clarifies financial  accounting and reporting for derivative
instruments,   including  certain  derivative   instruments  embedded  in  other
contracts  (collectively  referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities
under SFAS No. 133. SFAS 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified
after June 30, 2003, and designated hedges after June 30, 2003, except for those
provisions of SFAS 149 which relate to SFAS No. 133  implementation  issues that
have been  effective for fiscal  quarters that began prior to June 15, 2003. For
those issues,  the provisions that are currently in effect should continue to be
applied in  accordance  with their  respective  effective  dates.  In  addition,
certain  provisions of SFAS 149,  which relate to forward  purchases or sales of
when-issued  securities  or other  securities  that do not yet exist,  should be
applied to both existing contracts and new contracts entered into after June 30,
2003. The adoption of SFAS 149 had no material impact on the Company's financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 2 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

         Property and equipment, net consists of the following:

                                                                       As of June 30,
                                                                  -----------------------
                                                                     2005        2004
                                                                  --------     ---------
               Leased equipment                                   $156,160     $137,124
               Equipment and cylinders                              19,985       17,707
               Tanks held for installation                           5,498        4,557
               Vehicles                                              1,044          285
               Computer equipment and software                       5,103        4,401
               Office furniture and fixtures                         1,671        1,658
               Leasehold improvements                                1,978        1,963
                                                                  --------     --------
                                                                   191,439      167,695
               Less accumulated depreciation and amortization       86,652       74,726
                                                                  --------     --------

                                                                  $104,787     $ 92,969
                                                                  ========     ========

                                      F-13




                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

            Included in leased  equipment  is  capitalized  component  parts and
direct costs  associated  with  installation  of  equipment  leased to others of
$46,812  and  $41,485  at June 30,  2005  and  2004,  respectively.  Accumulated
depreciation and amortization of these costs was $28,922 and $25,450 at June 30,
2005 and 2004, respectively.  Upon early service termination, the Company writes
off  the  remaining  net  book  value  of  direct  costs   associated  with  the
installation of equipment.

            Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment was $13,751,
$13,255  and  $13,836  for the  years  ended  June 30,  2005,  2004,  and  2003,
respectively.

NOTE 3 - ACQUISITIONS

            On October 1, 2004,  the  Company  purchased  the bulk CO2  beverage
carbonation business of privately owned Pain Enterprises,  Inc., of Bloomington,
Indiana  ("Pain"),  for total cash  consideration of $15.7 million.  The Company
acquired  approximately  9,000 net customer  accounts,  including 6,300 tanks in
service,  vehicles,  parts, and supplies.  The acquisition of Pain  Enterprises'
bulk CO2 beverage  carbonation  business,  which  operated in 12 Midwestern  and
Southeastern  states:  Florida,  Georgia,  Illinois,  Indiana,  Iowa,  Kentucky,
Michigan, Missouri,  Minnesota, Ohio, Tennessee and Wisconsin,  provides further
penetration and increased operating efficiencies in markets in which the Company
operates.

            The purchase price was allocated between tangible assets, intangible
assets, and goodwill as follows:  $6.7 million for tangible assets, $6.2 million
for intangible  assets and $2.8 million for goodwill.  Tangible assets are being
depreciated over a weighted average life of 10 years,  while intangible  assets,
excluding  goodwill,  are being amortized over a weighted  average life of eight
years.

            Goodwill  was  recorded  as the  purchase  price of the  acquisition
exceeded the fair market value of the tangible and  intangible  assets  acquired
and is a direct  result of  synergies  arising  from the  transaction.  Both the
purchase  price  allocation  and the  useful  lives of  purchased  tangible  and
intangible  assets were derived with the assistance of an independent  valuation
consultant and other independent sources as appropriate.

            In conjunction with this transaction, the Senior Credit Facility was
amended to, among other  things,  increase the B Term Loan from $10.0 million to
$23.0 million and to modify certain covenants.

            In addition,  on June 30, 2005, the Company  acquired  approximately
1,200 customer  accounts and 1,000 bulk CO2 tanks, most of which were in service
from Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. ("CCE") for approximately $1.4 million. Subject
to completion of an analysis of the purchase  price  allocation and useful lives
of tangible and  intangible  assets by September 30, 2005, the purchase price is
being  allocated  between  tangible  and  intangible  assets:  $1.0  million for
tangible assets, and $0.4 million for customer lists.  Tangible assets are being
depreciated  over a weighted average life of 12 years,  while intangible  assets
are being amortized over a weighted average life of 8.5 years.

            The results of operations for the Pain  acquisition  are included in
the  statements of operations for the period of October 1, 2004 through June 30,
2005. However, the following unaudited pro forma results of operations have been
prepared  assuming  the  acquisitions  described  above had  occurred  as of the
beginning  of the  periods  presented  in  the  Company's  historical  financial
statements,  including  adjustments  to the financial  statements for additional
depreciation  of  tangible  assets,   amortization  of  intangible  assets,  and
increased interest on borrowings to finance the acquisitions.  The unaudited pro
forma operating results are not necessarily indicative of operating results that
would have occurred had these  acquisitions been consummated as of the beginning
of the periods presented,  or of future operating results. In certain cases, the
operating  results  for  periods  prior  to the  acquisitions  are  based on (a)
unaudited  financial data provided by the seller or (b) an estimate of revenues,

                                      F-14





                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

cost of revenues and/or selling,  general and  administrative  expenses based on
information  provided  by the  seller or  otherwise  available  to the  Company.
Inasmuch as the Company acquired customer accounts,  tanks at customer sites and
other  assets  related to the  beverage  carbonation  business of Pain,  certain
operational  and support costs  provided for by the seller are not applicable to
the Company's cost of servicing these  customers and were therefore  eliminated;
however,  the Company incurred  approximately $500 in non-recurring costs during
the integration phase of Pain acquisition that are included in the unaudited pro
forma  results  presented  below.  Integration  costs  associated  with CCE were
minimal.

     Unaudited Pro Forma:

                                         For the Year Ended June 30,
                                         ---------------------------
                                      2005           2004           2003
                                    ---------      ---------      ---------
     Total Revenues                 $ 100,863      $  91,623      $  85,196
     Operating Income                  20,135         15,784          5,922

     Net income                        26,594          4,555         (2,564)
     Preferred stock dividends           (182)          (763)          (706)
                                    ---------      ---------      ---------
     Net income available to
            common shareholders     $  26,412      $   3,792      $  (3,270)
                                    =========      =========      =========

     Basic income per share         $    2.06      $    0.35      $   (0.31)
                                    =========      =========      =========
     Diluted income per share       $    1.86      $    0.32      $   (0.31)
                                    =========      =========      =========

NOTE 4 -    GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

            The Company  adopted  SFAS 142 as of July 1, 2001,  resulting  in no
goodwill  amortization expense for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
Goodwill and indefinite life intangible  assets are no longer  amortized but are
subject to annual  impairment  tests.  The Company  determined that there was no
impairment of goodwill during 2005, 2004 and 2003.

            Information  regarding the Company's  goodwill and other  intangible
assets is as follows:

                                          Accumulated   Net Book
As of June 30, 2005              Cost     Amortization   Value
                               -------     ----------- ---------
Goodwill                       $27,099     $ 5,006     $22,094
Non-competition agreements       2,865       2,029         836
Customer lists                   6,347         587       5,760
                               -------     -------     -------
                               $36,311     $ 7,622     $28,690
                               =======     =======     =======

As of June 30, 2004:
Goodwill                       $24,228     $ 5,006     $19,222
Non-competition agreements       2,315       1,612         703
Customer lists                      62          21          41
                               -------     -------     -------
                               $26,605     $ 6,639     $19,966
                               =======     =======     =======

            Changes in goodwill are summarized as follows:

Year Ended June 30,          Beginning   Additions    Disposals     Ending
--------------------         ---------   ---------    ---------     ------
2003                         $ 24,228         -             -      $ 24,228
2004                         $ 24,228         -             -      $ 24,228
2005                         $ 24,228    $ 2,871            -      $ 27,099

            Amortization  expense for other intangible assets was $986, $291 and
$552 for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

            Estimated  amortization  expense  for each of the next five years is
$1,171,  $1,085,  $818,  $754,  and $495 for fiscal  years ending June 30, 2006,
2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.

                                      F-15



                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

NOTE 5 -    LEASES

            The Company leases equipment to its customers  generally pursuant to
five-year or six-year  non-cancelable  operating  leases which expire on varying
dates  through June 2011.  At June 30, 2005,  future  minimum  payments due from
customers  include,  where  applicable,  amounts for a continuous  supply of CO2
under the budget plan,  which provides  bundled pricing for tank rental and CO2.
The revenue stream has been segregated in conformity with EITF 00-21 between the
estimated  rental of equipment and the sale of CO2. The following table presents
the separate revenue streams  attributable to the lease of the equipment and the
sale of the CO2:

            Year Ended June 30,          Equipment                   CO2
            -------------------          ---------                   ---
            2006                         $ 30,965                $ 18,883
            2007                           25,120                  15,318
            2008                           19,489                  11,884
            2009                           14,435                   8,803
            2010                            8,956                   5,461
            Thereafter                      3,256                   1,986
                                         --------                --------
                                         $102,221                $ 62,335
                                         ========                =========

NOTE 6 -    LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following:

                                                                            As of June 30,
                                                                            --------------
                                                                          2005        2004
                                                                       --------      --------
Notes payable to banks under credit  facility.  Drawings at
       June 30, 2005 and 2004 are at a weighted  average
       interest rate of 4.8% and 6.4%, respectively.                   $ 32,000      $ 36,800
Other note payable                                                            -           210
                                                                       --------      --------
                                                                         32,000        37,010
Less current maturities of long-term debt                                     -         6,048
                                                                       --------      --------
       Long-term debt, excluding current maturities                    $ 32,000      $ 30,962
                                                                       ========      ========

PREVIOUS FACILITIES

            In September  2001, the Company  entered into a $60.0 million second
amended  and  restated  revolving  credit  facility  with a  syndicate  of banks
("Amended Credit Facility").

            Prior to June 30, 2002, the Amended  Credit  Facility was amended to
adjust  certain  financial  covenants  for the quarter  ended March 31, 2002 and
prospectively, and non-compliance with the minimum EBITDA covenant for the three
months ended March 31, 2002 was waived. As of June 30, 2002, the Company was not
in compliance  with certain of its financial  covenants.  On September 27, 2002,
the Amended Credit  Facility was amended to adjust certain  financial  covenants
for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, and prospectively,  and the maturity of the
Amended  Credit  Facility was extended to November 17, 2003. As of September 30,
2002, the Company was in compliance  with all of the financial  covenants  under
the Amended Credit  Facility.  On February 7, 2003, the Amended Credit  Facility
was amended to adjust certain financial covenants for the quarter ended December
31, 2002 and prospectively,  non-compliance with the minimum EBITDA covenant for
the three months ended December 31, 2002 was waived, the maturity of the Amended
Credit  Facility was extended to April 29, 2004, and the Amended Credit Facility
was  reduced  to $45.0  million.  As of March 31,  2003 and June 30,  2003,  the
Company was in compliance with all of the financial  covenants under the Amended
Credit Facility.

            On August 25,  2003,  the  Company  terminated  the  Amended  Credit
Facility  and  entered  into a  $50.0  million  senior  credit  facility  with a
syndicate of banks (the "Senior Credit  Facility").  The Senior Credit  Facility
initially consisted of a $30.0 million A term loan facility (the "A Term Loan"),
a $10.0 million B term loan  facility  (the "B Term Loan"),  and a $10.0 million
revolving loan facility (the "Revolving Loan Facility"). On October 1, 2004, the
Senior Credit  Facility was amended to, among other things,  increase the B Term
Loan to $23.0  million and to modify  certain  financial  covenants.  The Senior
Credit Facility was collateralized by all of the Company's assets. Additionally,
the Company was precluded from declaring or paying any cash dividends.

            The  Company  was  entitled to select  either  Eurodollar  Loans (as
defined) or Base Rate Loans (as defined),  plus applicable margin, for principal
borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility. Applicable margin was determined by
a pricing grid based on the  Company's  Consolidated  Total  Leverage  Ratio (as
defined) as follows:

                                      F-16




                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

                                               B Term        Revolving           A Term             B Term           Revolving
             Consolidated   A Term Loans        Loans          Loans              Loans              Loans            Loans
                Total       maintained as    maintained as  maintained as      maintained as      maintained as     maintained
              Leverage      Base Rate          Base Rate     Eurodollar         Base Rate          Eurodollar      as Eurodollar
Level          Ratio          Loans              Loans         Loans              Loans               Loans           Loans
-----          -----          -----              -----         -----              -----               -----           -----

            Less than
  1         2.50:1.00         2.50%               2.75%        2.50%               3.50%             3.75%            3.50%

            Greater than
            or equal to
            2.50:1.00
            but less than
  2         3.00:1.00         2.75%               3.00%        2.75%               3.75%             4.00%            3.75%

            Greater than
            or equal to
  3         3.00:1.00         3.00%               3.25%        3.00%               4.00%             4.25%            4.00%

            The  Company  was also  required  to meet  certain  affirmative  and
negative  covenants,  including  but not  limited to  financial  covenants.  The
Company was required to assess  compliance with these financial  covenants under
the Senior Credit Facility on a quarterly basis. These financial  covenants were
based on a measure that is not consistent with accounting  principles  generally
accepted in the United States of America.  Such measure was EBITDA (as defined),
which represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,
as further  modified by certain defined  adjustments.  The failure to meet these
covenants,  absent a waiver or  amendment,  would  have  placed  the  Company in
default  and cause the debt  outstanding  under the Senior  Credit  Facility  to
immediately  become due and  payable.  The  Company was in  compliance  with all
covenants  under the Senior  Credit  Facility as of  September  30, 2003 and all
subsequent quarters up to and including March 31, 2005.

            In connection with the  termination of the Amended Credit  Facility,
during the first quarter of fiscal 2004,  the Company  recognized a loss of $0.9
million from the write-off of unamortized  financing  costs  associated with the
Amended Credit Facility and recorded $2.2 million in financing costs  associated
with the Senior Credit Facility. Such costs are being amortized over the life of
the Senior Credit Facility.

CURRENT FACILITY

            On May 27, 2005, the Company  terminated the Senior Credit  Facility
and entered into a $60.0 million revolving credit facility with Bank of America,
N.A.  (the "2005  Credit  Facility"),  maturing  May 27,  2010.  The  Company is
entitled to select either Base Rate Loans (as defined) or Eurodollar  Rate Loans
(as defined),  plus applicable margin,  for principal  borrowings under the 2005
Credit Facility.  Applicable margin is determined by a pricing grid based on the
Company's Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined) as follows:

              Pricing   Consolidated Leverage       Eurodollar Rate        Base Rate
               Level            Ratio                    Loans               Loans
              -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                I        Greater than or equal to        2.250%              0.750%
                         2.50x
              -----------------------------------------------------------------------
               II        Less than 2.50x but greater     2.000%              0.500%
                         than or equal to 2.00x
              -----------------------------------------------------------------------
              III        Less than 2.00x but greater     1.750%              0.250%
                         than or equal to 1.50x
              -----------------------------------------------------------------------
               IV        Less than 1.50x but greater     1.500%              0.000%
                         than or equal to 0.50x
              -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                V        Less than 0.50x                 1.250%              0.000%
              -----------------------------------------------------------------------

                                      F-17




                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

            Interest is payable periodically on borrowings under the 2005 Credit
Facility. The 2005 Credit Facility is uncollateralized.

            The Company is required to meet  certain  affirmative  and  negative
covenants,  including financial covenants. The Company is required to assess our
compliance  with these  financial  covenants under the 2005 Credit Facility on a
quarterly  basis.  These financial  covenants are based on a measure that is not
consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.  Such measure is EBITDA (as defined),  which represents earnings before
interest, taxes,  depreciation and amortization,  as further modified by certain
defined  adjustments.  The failure to meet these  covenants,  absent a waiver or
amendment,  would place the  Company in default  and cause the debt  outstanding
under the 2005 Credit  Agreement to  immediately  become due and payable.  As of
June 30, 2005, the Company was in compliance  with all covenants  under the 2005
Credit Facility.

            In connection  with the  termination of the Senior Credit  Facility,
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company  recognized a loss of $1.7
million from the write-off of unamortized  financing  costs  associated with the
Senior Credit Facility and recorded $0.4 million in financing  costs  associated
with the 2005 Credit  Facility.  Such costs are being amortized over the life of
the 2005 Credit Facility.

            As of June  30,  2005,  a total  of $32.0  million  was  outstanding
pursuant to the 2005 Credit  Facility,  due in full in May 2010, with a weighted
average interest rate of 4.8% per annum.

HEDGING ACTIVITIES

            Effective July 1, 2000, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133 "ACCOUNTING
FOR DERIVATIVE  INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING  ACTIVITIES," as amended,  which,  among
other things,  establishes  accounting  and reporting  standards for  derivative
instruments,   including  certain  derivative   instruments  embedded  in  other
contracts and for hedging  activities.  All derivatives,  whether  designated in
hedging  relationships  or not, are required to be recorded on the balance sheet
at fair value.  For a derivative  designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective
portions of changes in the fair value of the  derivative  are  recorded in other
comprehensive  income and are recognized in the income statement when the hedged
item affects earnings. Ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of cash
flow hedges are recognized in earnings.

            The  Company  uses  derivative  instruments  to manage  exposure  to
interest rate risks.  The Company's  objectives for holding  derivatives  are to
minimize the risks using the most  effective  methods to eliminate or reduce the
impact of this exposure. Prior to August 25, 2003, the Company was a party to an
interest rate swap agreement (the "Prior Swap") with a notional  amount of $12.5
million and a termination  date of September 28, 2003. Under the Prior Swap, the
Company paid a fixed interest rate of 5.23% per annum and received a LIBOR-based
floating  rate. In conjunction  with the  termination of the Prior Swap prior to
maturity,  the Company paid $86,  which  represented  the fair value of the swap
liability.  The  $86  was  reclassified  from  other  comprehensive  income  and
recognized as a component of the loss on early extinguishment of debt.

            The Prior  Swap,  which was  designated  as a cash flow  hedge,  was
deemed to be a highly  effective  transaction,  and  accordingly the loss on the
derivative  instrument was reported as a component of other comprehensive income
(loss).  Prior to  termination  of the Prior Swap in August  2003,  the  Company
recorded $43, net of the  reclassification  adjustment of $86,  representing the
change in fair value of the Prior Swap, as other comprehensive income.

            In order to reduce the Company's exposure to increases in Eurodollar
rates, and consequently to increases in interest  payments,  the Company entered
into an interest rate swap  transaction  (the "Swap") on October 2, 2003, in the
amount of $20.0 million ("Notional  Amount") with an effective date of March 15,
2004 and a maturity  date of  September  15,  2005.  Pursuant  to the Swap,  the
Company  pays  a  fixed  interest  rate  of  2.12%  per  annum  and  receives  a
Eurodollar-based  floating  rate.  The effect of the Swap is to  neutralize  any
changes  in  Eurodollar  rates  on the  Notional  Amount.  As the  Swap  was not
effective  until March 15, 2004 and no cash flows were  exchanged  prior to that
date,  the Swap did not meet the  requirements  to be  designated as a cash flow
hedge.  As such,  an  unrealized  loss of $177 was  recognized  in the Company's
results of operations  for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004,  reflecting  the
change in fair value of the Swap from  inception to the  effective  date.  As of
March 15, 2004,  the Swap met the  requirements  to be designated as a cash flow
hedge and is deemed a highly  effective  transaction.  Accordingly,  the Company
recorded $264  representing  the change in fair value of the Swap from March 15,
2004 through June 30, 2004, as other comprehensive  income.  During fiscal 2005,
the fair value of the Swap decreased by $22 to $65.

                                      F-18




                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

NOTE 7 - SUBORDINATED DEBT

            In October 1997,  the Company issued $30.0 million of its 12% Senior
Subordinated  Promissory  Notes (the "1997  Notes") with  interest  only payable
semi-annually  on April 30 and October 31, due October 31, 2004.  The 1997 Notes
were sold with  detachable  seven year  warrants  to purchase  an  aggregate  of
655,738 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $16.40 per share.  At the
date of issuance,  in accordance with APB 14,  "ACCOUNTING FOR CONVERTIBLE  DEBT
AND DEBT ISSUED WITH PURCHASE WARRANTS," the Company allocated proceeds of $29.7
million to the debt and $0.3 million to warrants, with the resulting discount on
the debt referred to as the original issue  discount.  Prior to August 25, 2003,
the original  issue  discount was being  amortized as interest  expense over the
life of the debt,  resulting in an effective  interest rate on the 1997 Notes of
12.1% per annum. The amount allocated to the warrants was credited to additional
paid-in capital. In conjunction with the issuance of the 1997 Notes, the Company
was required to meet certain affirmative and negative covenants.

            On May 4, 1999, the Company sold an additional  $10.0 million of its
12% Senior  Subordinated  Promissory Notes (the "1999 Notes").  Except for their
October 31, 2005 maturity date, the 1999 Notes were  substantially  identical to
the 1997 Notes described  above.  The 1999 Notes were sold with detachable 6-1/2
year  warrants to purchase an aggregate of 372,892  shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $6.65 per share.

            In return for modifying  certain financial  covenants  governing the
1997 Notes,  the exercise price of 612,053 of the warrants  issued in connection
with the 1997 Notes was reduced to $6.65 per share.  On May 4, 1999, the trading
range of the Company's common stock was $6.44 to $6.88 per share. To assist with
the  valuation of the newly  issued  warrants  and the  repriced  warrants,  the
Company hired an outside  consultant.  Utilizing the  Black-Scholes  Model,  the
warrants  issued  with the 1997 Notes were  valued at $1.26 per  warrant,  or an
aggregate value of $774 and the warrants issued with the 1999 Notes at $1.47 per
warrant, or an aggregate value of $549. Both amounts were recorded as additional
paid-in capital, offset by the original issue discount,  which is netted against
the outstanding balance of the 1997 Notes and 1999 Notes. After giving effect to
the amortization of the original issue discount,  the effective interest rate on
the 1999 Notes was 13.57% per annum.

            As of December 31, 2002,  the Company was in compliance  with all of
the  financial  covenants  under the 1997 Notes and 1999  Notes.  On February 7,
2003, the interest  coverage  ratio  governing the 1997 Notes and 1999 Notes was
amended for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 and prospectively. As of March 31,
2003 and June 30, 2003, the Company was in compliance  with all of the financial
covenants under the 1997 Notes and 1999 Notes.

            On August  25,  2003,  concurrently  with the  closing of the Senior
Credit  Facility,  the Company  prepaid the 1997 Notes and 1999 Notes and issued
$30.0 million of the Company's 16.3% Senior  Subordinated Notes due February 27,
2009 (the "New  Notes")  with  interest  only  payable  quarterly  in arrears on
February 28, May 31, August 31 and November 30 of each year, commencing November
30, 2003.  Interest on the New Notes was 12% per annum  payable in cash and 4.3%
per annum  payable  "in  kind" by adding  the  amount  of such  interest  to the
principal  amount  of the New  Notes  then  outstanding.  Ten year  warrants  to
purchase an  aggregate  of 425,000  shares of the  Company's  common stock at an
exercise price of $8.79 per share were issued in connection  with the New Notes.
Utilizing the  Black-Scholes  Model,  the warrants issued in connection with the
New Notes were valued at $3.70 per warrant,  or an aggregate value of $1,573. In
addition, the maturity date of 665,403 existing warrants,  335,101 due to expire
in 2004 and  330,302  due to expire in 2005,  was  extended  to  February  2009,
resulting in additional value of $1.31 and $0.97 per warrant,  respectively,  or
an aggregate value of $760. At the date of issuance,  in accordance with APB 14,
"ACCOUNTING  FOR CONVERTIBLE  DEBT AND DEBT ISSUED WITH PURCHASE  WARRANTS," the
Company allocated  proceeds of $27.7 million to the debt and $2.3 million to the
warrants,  with the  resulting  discount on the debt referred to as the original
issue  discount.  The original  issue  discount was being  amortized as interest
expense over the life of the debt.

            In  connection  with the early  repayment of the 1997 Notes and 1999
Notes during the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company  recognized a loss of
$1.0 million attributable to the unamortized  financing costs and original issue
discount  associated  with the 1997  Notes and 1999  Notes,  and  recorded  $0.6
million of financing costs  associated with the New Notes.  Such fees were being
amortized  over  the  life of the New  Notes.  The  weighted  average  effective
interest rate of the New Notes,  including the  amortization  of original  issue
discount, was 18.0% per annum.

            As with the Senior Credit Facility, the Company was required to meet
certain  affirmative and negative  covenants under the New Notes,  including but
not limited to financial covenants.  In conjunction with the modification of the
Senior Credit Facility on October 1, 2004,  certain  financial  covenants of the
New Notes were modified.  The Company was in compliance with all covenants under
the New Notes as of  September  30, 2003 and all  subsequent  quarters up to and
including the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

                                      F-19




                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

            On April 4, 2005, the Company used $34.3 million of the net proceeds
from the sale of 2,041,713 shares of its common stock in an underwritten  public
offering in March 2005 to redeem the New Notes at 106% of the original principal
amount plus accrued  interest.  In addition,  during the quarter  ended June 30,
2005, the Company  recognized a loss on the early termination of debt associated
with the New Notes of  approximately  $4.1 million,  which included a prepayment
penalty,  unamortized  fees and the  unamortized  portion of the original  issue
discount.

            During the fiscal year ended June 30,  2002,  65,574 of the warrants
issued in  connection  with the 1997 Notes were  exercised  and  converted  into
shares of the Company's  common stock.  On August 22, 2002, in conjunction  with
the private  placement of 1,663,846  shares of the Company's  common stock,  the
remaining  warrants  issued in conjunction  with the 1997 Notes and the warrants
issued in connection with the 1999 Notes were adjusted pursuant to anti-dilution
provisions  to provide for the purchase of an  additional  21,906  shares of the
Company's common stock.  During fiscal 2004,  warrants to purchase 30,831 shares
of the Company's  common stock issued in connection with the 1997 Notes and 1999
Notes were exercised  pursuant to the cashless exercise  provision  contained in
the warrants.  In connection  with the cashless  exercise,  warrants to purchase
50,647  shares of the  Company's  common stock were  canceled.  In addition,  in
fiscal 2004 warrants to purchase  75,000  shares of the  Company's  common stock
issued in  connection  with the New Notes were  exercised  for proceeds of $659,
recorded as additional paid-in-capital on the Company's balance sheet as of June
30,  2004.  During  fiscal  2005,  warrants  to purchase  893,956  shares of the
Company's common stock issued in connection with the 1997 Notes,  1999 Notes and
New Notes were  exercised  for  proceeds of $743.  In  connection  with  certain
cashless exercises,  warrants to purchase 389,528 shares of the Company's common
stock were canceled.  As of June 30, 2005, no warrants issued in connection with
the 1997 Notes, 1999 Notes or New Notes were outstanding.

NOTE 8 -    REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK

            In May 2000,  the  Company  sold  5,000  shares  of its  Series A 8%
Cumulative  Convertible  Preferred  Stock, no par value (the "Series A Preferred
Stock"), for $1,000 per share (the initial "Liquidation Preference"). Cumulative
dividends  were payable  quarterly in arrears at the rate of 8% per annum on the
Liquidation  Preference,  and, to the extent not paid in cash, were added to the
Liquidation Preference.  Shares of the Series A Preferred Stock were convertible
into  shares  of  common  stock at any time at a  conversion  price of $9.28 per
share. In connection  with the sale,  costs in the amount of $65 were charged to
additional paid-in capital. In August 2004, the holder of the Series A Preferred
Stock  converted  its shares into 754,982  shares of common  stock,  and $7,007,
representing  the Liquidation  Preference,  was reclassified to common stock and
additional paid-in capital on the Company's balance sheet.

            In November  2001,  the Company sold 2,500 shares of its Series B 8%
Cumulative  Convertible  Preferred  Stock, no par value (the "Series B Preferred
Stock"), for $1,000 per share (the initial "Liquidation Preference"). Cumulative
dividends  were payable  quarterly in arrears at the rate of 8% per annum on the
Liquidation  Preference,  and, to the extent not paid in cash, were added to the
Liquidation Preference.  Shares of the Series B Preferred Stock were convertible
into  shares of common  stock at any time at a  conversion  price of $12.92  per
share.  In December 2004, the holder of the Series B Preferred  Stock  converted
its shares into 247,420  shares of common stock,  and $3,197,  representing  the
Liquidation Preference,  was reclassified to common stock and additional paid-in
capital on the Company's balance sheet.

            During the fiscal  years  ended June 30,  2005,  2004 and 2003,  the
carrying  amount (and  Liquidation  Preferences) of the Series A Preferred Stock
and Series B Preferred Stock ("Preferred Stock") was increased by $182, $763 and
$706, respectively, for dividends accrued.

NOTE 9 -    SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

            (a)         OFFERING

            On March 30, 2005, the Company sold  2,041,713  shares of its common
stock in an underwritten public offering.  Based on the public offering price of
$24.17 per share and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions, net
proceeds  were  approximately  $46.6  million.  On March 31,  2005,  the Company
reduced the outstanding  principal amount of the Senior Credit Facility by $11.2
million and on April 4, 2005,  the Company used  approximately  $34.3 million of
the net proceeds  from the offering to redeem all of the New Notes (see Note 7).
In addition,  the Company incurred $1.1 million in legal,  accounting,  printing
and other expenses which were  recorded  as a reduction  of  additional  paid in
capital.

                                      F-20



                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


            (b)         NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

            In May 1997,  the Company  entered into a supply  agreement with The
BOC Group,  Inc. ("BOC") by which BOC committed to provide the Company with 100%
of  its  CO2  requirements  at  competitive  prices.  In  connection  with  this
agreement, the Company granted BOC a warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of its
common stock.  The warrant was  exercisable at $17 per share from May 1, 1999 to
May 1, 2002 and  thereafter  at $20 per share until April 30, 2007. In May 2000,
the Company  solicited BOC to purchase  1,111,111  shares of its common stock at
$9.00  per  share.  In  connection  with this  purchase  of  common  stock,  the
outstanding warrant was reduced to 400,000 shares, with an exercise price of $17
per share. On the date of issuance of the common stock, the closing price of the
common stock on the Nasdaq National Market was $8.00 per share. In addition,  in
March 2005,  warrants to purchase  59,329 shares of common stock were  exercised
pursuant to the  cashless  exercise  provisions  contained in the  warrants.  In
connection with this cashless  exercise,  warrants to purchase 140,671 shares of
the Company's common stock were canceled.  As of June 30, 2005, 200,000 warrants
to purchase shares of the Company's common stock were outstanding.

            In January 2001, the Company granted to each  non-employee  director
options for 10,000 shares of common stock.  An aggregate of 50,000  options were
granted at an exercise price equal to $7.82.  In March 2003, the Company granted
to each  non-employee  director  options for 6,000 shares of common stock, or an
aggregate of 36,000  options at an exercise price of $4.85.  In September  2003,
the  Company  granted to two of its  non-employee  directors  options for 22,000
shares of common stock,  or an aggregate of 44,000  options at an exercise price
of $8.91.  In  addition,  in March  2004,  the  Company  granted a  non-employee
director  options  for  6,000  shares of common  stock at an  exercise  price of
$16.25.  The exercise price for all grants is equal to the average closing price
of the common stock on the Nasdaq  National Market for the 20 trading days prior
to the grant date.  All options vest in three to five equal annual  installments
commencing upon issuance,  and have a ten-year term, and as of June 30, 2005 and
2004,  options for 52,267 and 58,533  shares,  respectively,  were  exercisable.
During the year ended June 30, 2005, 51,333 shares were exercised.

            (c)         STOCK OPTION PLANS

            The Board of Directors  of the Company  adopted the 1995 Option Plan
(the "1995  Plan").  Under the 1995 Plan,  the  Company has  reserved  2,400,000
shares of common stock for employees of the Company. Under the terms of the 1995
Plan,  options granted may be either  incentive  stock options or  non-qualified
stock options.  The exercise price of incentive  options shall be at least equal
to 100% of the fair market  value of the  Company's  common stock at the date of
the grant,  and the exercise  price of  non-qualified  stock  options  issued to
employees  may not be less than 75% of the fair  market  value of the  Company's
common  stock at the date of the grant.  The maximum term for all options is ten
years.  Options granted to date generally vest in equal annual installments from
one to five years,  though a limited number of grants were  partially  vested at
the grant date.  The  weighted-average  fair value per share of options  granted
during the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $7.80,  $4.11 and $2.41,
respectively.

            The following summarizes the transactions pursuant to the 1995 Plan:

                                                             Weighted Average
                                               Options       Exercise Price Per
                                             Outstanding          Option           Options Exercisable
                                             -----------          ------           -------------------
            Outstanding at June 30, 2002      1,162,450          $ 10.15                 503,072
                   Granted                      326,350             6.87
                   Expired or canceled         (199,780)           11.36
                   Exercised                       (500)           11.25
                                             ----------
            Outstanding at June 30, 2003      1,288,520             9.13                 640,373
                   Granted                      379,300            15.61
                   Expired or canceled         (73,288)            12.18
                   Exercised                   (90,009)            10.17
                                             ----------
            Outstanding at June 30, 2004      1,504,523            10.55                 865,653
                   Granted                      290,500            25.42
                   Expired or canceled          (12,713)           13.50
                   Exercised                   (362,408)            7.66
                                            -----------
            Outstanding at June 30, 2005      1,419,902          $ 14.31                 896,444
                                            ===========

                                      F-21



                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

            The following  table sets forth certain  information  as of June 30,
2005:

                                            Options Outstanding                                Options Exercisable
                       ------------------------------------------------------------   -------------------------------------------

   Range of Exercise           Options        Weighted Average     Weighted Average                             Weighted Average
       Prices                Outstanding       Remaining Life       Exercise Price     Options Exercisable       Exercise Price
--------------------         -----------       --------------       --------------     -------------------       --------------
$  0.00 - $ 5.00                 20,673            7.02             $      4.72             16,270                     $ 4.79
$  5.01 - $10.00                463,299            6.06                    7.67            371,028                       7.42
$ 10.01 - $15.00                468,754            6.60                   12.52            348,183                      12.32
$ 15.01 - $20.00                177,676            8.99                   19.29             88,588                      19.29
$ 20.01 - $26.00                289,500            9.99                   25.44             72,375                      25.44
                           ------------      -----------------      ----------------   ------------------        ----------------
                              1,419,902            7.42             $     14.31            896,444                    $ 11.90
                           ============      =================      ================   ==================        ================

            The Board of Directors of the Company  adopted the Directors'  Stock
Option  Plan  (the   "Directors'   Plan").   Under  the  Directors'  Plan,  each
non-employee  director will receive  options for 6,000 shares of common stock on
the date of his or her first election to the board of directors. In addition, on
the third  anniversary of each  director's  first election to the Board,  and on
each three year anniversary thereafter,  each non-employee director will receive
an  additional  option to purchase  6,000 shares of common  stock.  The exercise
price per share for all options  granted under the Directors' Plan will be equal
to the fair  market  value of the  common  stock  as of the date of  grant.  All
options  vest  in  three  equal  annual  installments  beginning  on  the  first
anniversary of the date of grant. The maximum term for all options is ten years.
The  weighted-average  fair value per share of options  granted during the years
ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $5.94, $3.90 and $1.82, respectively.

            The following summarizes the transactions pursuant to the Directors'
Plan:

                                                                  Weighted Average
                                                  Options        Exercise Price Per
                                                Outstanding            Options         Options Exercisable
                                                -----------      ------------------    -------------------

          Outstanding at June 30, 2002             60,000        $         9.15                34,000
                  Granted                           6,000                  8.69
                                                -----------
          Outstanding at June 30, 2003             66,000                  9.11                45,997
                  Granted                          24,000                 13.71
                  Exercised                       (10,086)                 8.63
                                                ------------
          Outstanding at June 30, 2004             79,914                 10.55                53,994
                  Granted                           6,000                 22.70
                  Expired or canceled              (3,981)                 7.94
                  Exercised                       (48,933)                 8.90
                                                ------------
          Outstanding at June 30, 2005             33,000        $        15.53                24,998
                                                ============

            The following  table sets forth certain  information  as of June 30,
2005:

                                        Options Outstanding                               Options Exercisable
                          ------------------------------------------------------    ----------------------------------------

 Range of Exercise          Options        Weighted Average     Weighted Average                             Weighted Average
       Prices             Outstanding       Remaining Life       Exercise Price     Options Exercisable      Exercise Price
 -----------------        -----------      -----------------    ----------------    -------------------      ---------------
$ 10.01 - $15.00              15,000                4.60                $ 12.50              15,000            $    12.50
$ 15.01 - $20.00              12,000                8.69                  15.74               8,000                 15.74
$ 20.01 - $25.00               6,000                9.46                  22.70               1,998                 22.70
                          ----------       -----------------   -----------------    -------------------      ---------------
                              33,000                6.97                $ 15.53              24,998            $    14.35
                          ==========       =================   =================    ===================      ===============

                                      F-22


                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

NOTE 10 -   EARNINGS PER SHARE

            The Company  calculates  earnings per share in  accordance  with the
requirements of SFAS No. 128,  "EARNINGS PER SHARE" ("SFAS 128").  The following
table presents the Company's net income (loss) available to common  shareholders
and income (loss) per share,  basic and diluted (in thousands,  except per share
amounts):

                                                             Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
                                                        ------------------------------------
                                                          2005           2004           2003
                                                          ----           ----           ----

Net income (loss)                                        $ 25,591      $  2,180      $ (4,939)
Redeemable preferred stock dividends                         (182)         (763)         (706)
                                                         --------      --------      --------
Net income (loss) -
    available to common shareholders                     $ 25,409      $  1,417      $ (5,645)
                                                         ========      ========      ========

Weighted average outstanding shares of common stock:

Basic                                                      12,808        10,689        10,396
Diluted                                                    14,295        11,822        10,396

Basic income (loss) per share                            $   1.98      $   0.13      $  (0.54)
                                                         ========      ========      ========
Diluted income (loss) per share                          $   1.79      $   0.12      $  (0.54)
                                                         ========      ========      ========

            In August 2004, 5,000 shares of the Company's  redeemable  preferred
stock were converted into 754,982  shares of common stock.  The remaining  2,500
shares of  redeemable  preferred  stock were  converted  into 247,420  shares of
common stock in December 2004 (see Note 8). In accordance with SFAS 128, diluted
shares of common stock in fiscal 2005 includes 209,812 common stock  equivalents
as if the  Redeemable  Preferred  Stock,  prior to  exercise  (Note 8), had been
converted to shares of common stock as such  conversion  would had been dilutive
to diluted income per share. Accordingly,  the calculation of diluted income per
share for the year ended  June 30,  2005  excludes  redeemable  preferred  stock
dividends.

                The weighted average shares  outstanding used to calculate basic
and diluted earnings (loss) per share were calculated as follows:

                                                             Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
                                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                         2005             2004           2003
                                                       -----------     ----------     ----------

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic             12,808,025     10,688,802     10,396,352

Outanding  options and  warrants to purchase
  shares of common stock - remaining shares
  after assuming repurchase with proceeds
  from exercise                                          1,486,514      1,133,033           --
                                                        ----------     ----------     ----------

Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted           14,294,539     11,821,835     10,396,352
                                                        ==========     ==========     ==========

Excluded from calculation of loss per common share:
   Outanding options and warrants to purchase
    shares of common stock - remaining shares
    after assuming repurchase with proceeds
    from exercise                                             --             --          287,915
                                                        ==========     ==========     ==========

                                      F-23



                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

            During  the year ended  June 30,  2005,  the  Company  excluded  the
equivalent  shares listed as these options and warrants to purchase common stock
were anti-dilutive.  In addition, for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 the
Company  excluded the effects of the  conversion of its  outstanding  redeemable
preferred  stock  using  the "if  converted"  method,  as the  effect  would  be
anti-dilutive (Note 8). The Company's redeemable preferred stock was convertible
into  973,104 and 910,983  shares of common  stock as of June 30, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.

            The following table lists options and warrants outstanding as of the
periods shown which were not included in the  computation of diluted EPS because
the options and  warrants  exercise  price was greater  than the average  market
price of the common shares:


                                                       As of June 30,
                                            --------------------------------
         Range of Exercise Prices             2005         2004        2003
         ------------------------             ----         ----        ----
             $  5.01 - $10.00                  -            -        160,370
             $ 10.01 - $15.00                  -          112,200    646,087
             $ 15.01 - $20.00                  -          646,779    444,679
             $ 20.01 - $26.00               295,500         -           -
                                            --------      -------  ---------
                                            295,500       758,979  1,251,136
                                            ========      =======  =========

NOTE 11 -INCOME TAXES

            The Company accounts for income taxes under SFAS No. 109 "ACCOUNTING
FOR INCOME  TAXES"  ("SFAS  109").  Deferred  income  taxes  reflect the net tax
effects of net operating loss  carryforwards and temporary  differences  between
the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial  reporting purposes
and the  amounts  used for income tax  purposes.  The tax  effects of  temporary
differences  that give rise to  significant  portions of deferred tax assets and
deferred tax liabilities are as follows:

                                                           As of June 30,
                                                           --------------
                                                       2005              2004*
                                                       -----              ----
      Deferred tax assets:
      Current
         Allowance for doubtful accounts             $    725          $    821
         Net operating loss carryforwards               6,871                -
                                                     --------          --------
                                                        7,596               821
                                                     --------          --------
      Non-current
         Intangible assets                              1,407             1,531
         Other                                             75                74
         Net operating loss carryforwards              37,839            42,688
                                                     --------          --------
                                                       39,321            44,293

      Total gross deferred tax assets                  46,917            45,114
      Less:  Valuation allowance                          -             (22,684)
                                                     --------          --------
      Net deferred tax assets                          46,917            22,430
                                                     --------          --------

      Deferred tax liabilities:
         Goodwill                                      (3,217)           (2,542)
         Fixed assets                                 (20,981)          (19,888)
                                                     --------          --------
      Total gross deferred liabilities                (24,198)          (22,430)
                                                     --------          --------

      Net deferred taxes                             $ 22,719          $     -
                                                     ========          =========

* Components of net deferred taxes have been reclassified.

            The  Company's  deferred  tax  assets  include  the  benefit  of net
operating  loss  carryforwards  incurred by the Company  through the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2005.  While the Company attained  profitability  during the year
ended June 30, 2004, based on the consideration of all of the available evidence
including the recent history of losses, management concluded as of June 30, 2004
that it was more likely than not that all of the net  deferred  tax assets would
not be realized.  Accordingly,  the Company recorded a valuation allowance equal
to the net deferred tax assets at that time.

                                      F-24




                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

            However,  as of June 30, 2005, after  consideration of all available
positive and negative  evidence,  it was  concluded  that the deferred tax asset
relating to the Company's net operating loss carryforwards will more likely than
not be realized in the future. Thus, the entire valuation allowance was reversed
and  reported  as a  component  of the  fiscal  2005  income tax  provision.  In
considering  whether or not a valuation  allowance was  appropriate  at June 30,
2005, the Company considered several aspects,  including, but not limited to the
following items:

     o      Cumulative  pretax book income during the three years ended June 30,
            2005

     o      Both positive and negative  evidence as to the Company's  ability to
            utilize  its  federal  net  operating  loss  carryforwards  prior to
            expiration,  such as the projected generation of taxable income, the
            Company's  position  in the market  place,  existence  of  long-term
            customer contracts, and growth opportunities

     o      Future reversals of taxable temporary differences

     o      Tax planning strategies

            In future years the Company will continue to evaluate whether or not
its net deferred tax assets will be fully realized  prior to expiration.  Should
it become  more likely  than not that all or a portion of the net  deferred  tax
assets will not be realized a valuation allowance will be recorded.

            As  of  June  30,  2005,   the  Company  had  net   operating   loss
carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately  $114 million and
for state purposes in varying amounts.  The federal net operating  carryforwards
expire in varying amounts through June 2025 as follows:

                   Year of Expiration
                   ------------------
                   2007-2011                           $    8,201
                   2012-2016                               18,864
                   2017-2021                               59,539
                   Thereafter                              27,435
                                                       ----------
                                                       $  114,039
                                                       ==========

            If an  "ownership  change" for federal  income tax purposes  were to
occur in the  future,  the  Company's  ability to use its  pre-ownership  change
federal and state net operating loss carryforwards (and certain built-in losses,
if any) would be subject to an annual  usage  limitation,  which  under  certain
circumstances  may prevent  the Company  from being able to utilize a portion of
such loss  carryforwards in future tax periods and may reduce its after-tax cash
flow.

                                      F-25



                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

            The  significant   components  for  income  taxes   attributable  to
continuing  operations for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004, and 2003 were as
follows:

                                                         Years Ended June, 30
                                               ------------------------------------------
                                                  2005            2004            2003
                                               ---------       ----------       ---------
      Current
          Federal                              $       -       $       63       $       -
          State                                       80               79               -
                                               ---------       ----------       ---------
      Total - Current                          $      80       $      142       $       -
                                               =========       ==========       =========

      Deferred
          Federal                              $ (16,397)      $        -       $       -
          State                                   (3,241)               -               -
                                               ---------       ----------       ---------
      Total - deferred                         $ (19,638)      $        -       $       -
                                               ---------       ----------       ---------
         Total                                 $ (19,558)      $      142       $       -
                                               =========       ==========       =========

            The income tax  provision  differs from that which would result from
applying the U.S. statutory income tax rate of 35% as follows:

       Tax at U.S. statutory rate              $   2,112       $      813       $ (1,729)
       State taxes, net of federal benefit           301              141       $   (183)
       Non-deductible items                          445              116              -
       Change in valuation allowance             (22,416)            (928)         1,911
                                               ---------       ----------       ---------
                                               $ (19,558)      $      142       $      -
                                               ==========      ==========       =========

            The change of the net  deferred tax  valuation  allowance of $22,416
during the year ended June 30, 2005 is net $268 tax impact of the  disqualifying
dispositions of incentive stock options reflected as additional paid-in capital.
In  addition,  during  the year  ended  June 30,  2005,  the tax  impact  of the
disqualifying  dispositions of incentive  stock options  reflected as additional
paid-in capital was $2,777 recorded as additional paid-in capital.

NOTE 12 - LEASE COMMITMENTS

            The Company leases office equipment,  trucks and warehouse/depot and
office  facilities  under operating  leases that expire at various dates through
June 2012.  Primarily all of the leases contain  renewal options and escalations
for real estate taxes, common charges,  etc. Future minimum lease payments under
noncancelable  operating leases (that have initial  noncancelable lease terms in
excess of one year) are as follows:

                    Year Ending June 30,
                              2006                     $  4,656
                              2007                        3,991
                              2008                        3,041
                              2009                        2,103
                              2010                        1,396
                           Thereafter                       335
                                                       --------
                                                       $ 15,522
                                                       ========

            Total  rental  costs  under  non-cancelable  operating  leases  were
approximately $5,650, $5,377 and $5,359 in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

NOTE 13 - CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT AND BUSINESS RISKS

            The Company's business activity is with customers located within the
United  States.  For each of the years  ended June 30,  2005,  2004 and 2003 the
Company's   sales  to  customers  in  the  food  and  beverage   industry   were
approximately 95%.

            There were no customers  that accounted for greater than 5% of total
sales  for each of the three  years  ended  June 30,  2005,  nor were  there any

                                      F-26



                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

customers  that  accounted for greater than 5% of total  accounts  receivable at
June 30, 2005 or 2004.

            The  Company  purchases  new bulk  CO2  systems  from the two  major
manufacturers  of such  systems.  The  inability  of  either  or  both of  these
manufacturers  to deliver new systems to the Company  could cause a delay in the
Company's  ability to fulfill the demand for its services and a possible loss of
sales, which could adversely affect operating results.

NOTE 14 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

            In May 1997,  the Company  entered into an exclusive  carbon dioxide
supply  agreement with The BOC Group,  Inc.  ("BOC") (See Note 8). The agreement
ensures readily  available high quality CO2 as well as relatively  stable liquid
carbon  dioxide  prices.  Pursuant  to  the  agreement,  the  Company  purchases
virtually all of its liquid CO2  requirements  from BOC. The agreement  contains
annual  adjustments  over the prior contract year for an increase or decrease in
the Producer Price Index for Chemical and Allied Products ("PPI") or the average
percentage  increase  in the  selling  price  of bulk  merchant  carbon  dioxide
purchased  by BOC's  large,  multi-location  beverage  customers  in the  United
States, whichever is less.

            The  Company is a  defendant  in legal  actions  which  arise in the
normal course of business.  In the opinion of  management,  the outcome of these
matters will not have a material effect on the Company's  financial  position or
results of operations.

NOTE 15 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

            Robert L. Frome,  a Director of the Company,  is a member of the law
firm of Olshan Grundman Frome  Rosenzweig & Wolosky LLP, which law firm has been
retained by the Company. Fees paid by the Company to such law firm during fiscal
2005, 2004 and 2003, were $631, $117 and $184, respectively.

            In connection  with the  Refinancing  described in Note 6, 55,000 of
the ten year  warrants  to  purchase  an  aggregate  of  425,000  shares  of the
Company's  common  stock at an exercise  price of $8.79 per share were issued to
Craig L. Burr, then a Director of the Company,  and one of the purchasers of the
New Notes, an affiliate of Mr. Burr's. Such warrants were exercised in May 2004.

            In connection with the  Refinancing  described in Note 6, 250,000 of
the ten year  warrants  to  purchase  an  aggregate  of  425,000  shares  of the
Company's  common  stock at an exercise  price of $8.79 per share were issued to
affiliates of J.P. Morgan Partners (BHCA), L.P.,  purchasers of a portion of the
New Notes. In addition, the expiration date of warrants to purchase an aggregate
of 665,403  shares of the Company's  common stock at an exercise  price of $6.65
per share previously  issued to J.P. Morgan Partners (BHCA),  L.P. in connection
with the 1997 Notes and 1999 Notes was  extended  until  February  27, 2009 (See
Note 6). Richard D. Waters, Jr., then a Director of the Company, is an affiliate
of J.P.  Morgan  Partners  (BHCA),  L.P.  All such  warrants  were  exercised in
December 2004.

NOTE 16 - DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

            The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair
value of each class of financial instruments.

            (a) Cash and cash  equivalents,  accounts  receivable  and  accounts
payable and accrued expenses

                The  carrying  amounts  approximate  fair value due to the short
maturity of these instruments.

            (b) Long-term and subordinated debt

                The fair value of the Company's  long-term and subordinated debt
has been estimated based on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of
the same remaining maturities.

            The  carrying  amounts  and fair values of the  Company's  financial
instruments are as follows:

                                      F-27




                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

                                                                   As of June 30,
                                                                   --------------
                                                              2005                   2004
                                                          -------------        ---------------
          Cash and cash equivalents                       $         968        $           505
          Accounts receivable                                     8,568                  6,141
          Accounts payable and accrued expenses                   7,958                  7,996
          Long-term debt, including current maturities           32,000                 37,010
          Subordinated debt                                           -                 29,163
          Fair value of swap - asset/(liability)                     65                     87

NOTE 17 - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

                                 1st Quarter              2nd Quarter            3rd Quarter             4th Quarter
                               -----------------     --------------------    -------------------    -------------------
                               2005        2004         2005       2004        2005        2004      2005         2004
                               ----        ----         ----       ----        ----        ----      ----         ----
Total revenues                $21,881     $20,238     $24,680     $19,454     $24,611    $20,072    $26,168      $21,072
Gross profit                   11,921      10,784      14,049      10,688      13,383     11,084     14,318       12,052
Operating income                3,948       2,442       4,717       2,824       4,881      3,229      5,289        3,915
Net income (loss)               1,854      (1,419)      2,437         774       2,710      1,072     18,590        1,753

Earnings (loss) per share (a):
   Basic                      $  0.15     $ (0.15)    $  0.20     $  0.05     $  0.21    $  0.08    $  1.98      $  0.14
   Diluted                    $  0.14     $ (0.15)    $  0.18     $  0.05     $  0.20    $  0.07    $  1.79      $  0.13


            (a) Per  common  share  amounts  for the  quarters  have  each  been
calculated separately.  Accordingly, quarterly amounts may not add to total year
earnings  per  share  because  of  differences  in  the  average  common  shares
outstanding during each period.

NOTE 18 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT

            The Company is in the process of evaluating  the impact of Hurricane
Katrina, a major hurricane,  which directly or indirectly impacted the Company's
operations and assets in northwest Florida and in portions of Alabama, Louisiana
and  Mississippi.  Several  cities  along the  coast of the Gulf of Mexico  were
devastated,  including  New Orleans,  Louisiana and Biloxi,  Mississippi.  Along
these coastal areas,  the Company has 500 to 1,500  customers that may have been
impacted. In addition,  the Company has tanks and other assets at customer sites
and at depot  distribution  sites  which  may not be  recoverable.  Accordingly,
during the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company  anticipates  recognizing a
reserve for unrecoverable or impaired assets,  unamortized tank installation and
placement  costs,  and  accounts  receivable  deemed not  collectible.  Based on
preliminary  estimates,  we  expect  such  reserve  to be $0.5  million  to $1.0
million.  However,  as we are able to examine the  recoverability  of assets and
evaluate each impacted customer, actual losses may differ from our estimate.

NOTE 19 - RESTATEMENT

            On September  13, 2005,  the filing date of Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2005 (the "10-K") of NuCO2 Inc. (the "Company"), the Company
believed that separate  presentation of  noncurrent deferred tax assets of $39.3
million  and the  noncurrent  deferred  tax  liability  of $24.2  million in the
balance  sheet as of June 30, 2005 was  appropriate.  Prior to the filing of the
Company's  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September  30, 2005 (the  "September
10-Q"),  the Company  determined  that in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting  Standards No. 109,  "ACCOUNTING FOR INCOME TAXES" ("SFAS 109"),  all
noncurrent deferred tax assets and liabilities should be offset and presented as
a single amount in the balance sheet,  and  accordingly,  in the September 10-Q,
noncurrent  deferred tax assets and the  noncurrent  deferred tax  liability are
presented as a single amount in the balance sheet as of both  September 30, 2005
and June 30, 2005.  The Company's  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  December 31,
2005 also presents  noncurrent  deferred tax assets and the noncurrent  deferred
tax  liability as a single  amount in the balance  sheet as of both December 31,
2005 and June 30, 2005. The financial  statements,  as now presented,  have been
restated to reflect the correction of this error.



                                      F-28


                                   NUCO2 INC.
                                   SCHEDULE II
                        VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                                  IN THOUSANDS

                                        Column B        Column C - Additions       Column D         Column E
                                        --------        --------------------       --------         --------
                                       Balance at     Charge to
                                      beginning of    costs and     Charged to                      Balance at
                                         period       expenses    other accounts   Deductions     end of period
                                         ------       --------    --------------   ----------     -------------
Year ended June 30, 2003
   Allowance for doubtful accounts    $   3,085       $     860     $    -         $   1,646      $  2,299
Year ended June 30, 2004
   Allowance for doubtful accounts    $   2,299       $     316     $    -         $     520      $  2,095
Year ended June 30, 2005
   Allowance for doubtful accounts    $   2,095       $     595     $    -         $     840      $  1,850`