alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.3
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, David G. Zahka, Chief Financial Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc., have reviewed Talk America Holdings, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 and, based on the inquiries I have made or caused to be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as the Chief Financial Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc., I hereby certify that:
 
 (i) the Talk America Holdings, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Talk America Holdings, Inc.
 
 This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Financial Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc. with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purposes. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Talk America Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Talk America Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 /s/ David G. Zahka
 David G. Zahka
 Chief Financial Officer
 May 7, 2004
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2854424-AUG-201108:45 AM
Exhibit
      34.2














Report
      of
      Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
      have
      examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
      Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation B Servicing Criteria, that U.S.
      Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria
      set
      forth in Item
      1122
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Corporate
      Trust Asset Backed Securities platform (the Platform) as of and for the year
      ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122 (d)(1)(iii) and 1122
      (d)(4)(iv) through 1122 (d)(4)(xiv), which the Company has determined are not
      applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing
      platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s
      compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express
      an
      opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the
      servicing criteria based on our examination.





Our
      examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
      Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
      on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable
      servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
      necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than
      all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise
      the
      Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the
      Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected
      transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the
      servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
      transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
      covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
      errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
      have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
      during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
      other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
      for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on
      the
      Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.





In
      our
      opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the
      afore-mentioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
      2006, for the
      Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated, in all
      material respects.





/s/
      Ernst
& Young LLP





February
      26, 2007
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

June 26, 2009

Mr. Mike A. Hatchell

Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell, LLP

100 Congress Avenue, Suite 300

Austin, TX 78701-4042

Mr. Robert B. Gilbreath

Hawkins, Parnell & Thackston, LLP

Highland Park Place

4514 Cole Avenue, Suite 500

Dallas, TX 75205

RE:Case Number:  06-0911

Court of Appeals Number:  03-04-00379-CV

Trial Court Number:  C2002-0547-A

Style:EDWARDS AQUIFER AUTHORITY, ET AL.

v.

CHEMICAL LIME, LTD.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinions and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 06-0911Page 1**
#### The Public Service Commission, Appellant, *v.*Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company.

Argued Jan. 8, 1918.

Appeal, No. 191, Jan. T., 1917, by The Public Service Commission, from order of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1916, No. 263, reversing order of The Public Service Commission, in case of The Public *328Service Commission of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company.

Before Brown, C. J., Mestrezat, Potter, Stewart, Moschzisker, Frazer and Walling, JJ.

Reversed.

Appeal from Superior Court.

The Superior Court reversed the order of The Public Service Commission. The Public Service Commission appealed.

*Error assigned*was the order of the Superior Court.

*William N. Trinkle,*with him *Berne H. Evans,*for appellant.

*W. L. Kinter, J. T. Brady*and *W. A.*Barkalovafor appellee.

February 25, 1918:

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Brown,

The question on this appeal is identical with that raised.on the appeal of The Public Service Commission in the matter of the complaint against the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, January Term, 1917, No. 190, and, for the reason stated in the opinion this day filed in that case, the order of the Superior Court is reversed and that of The Public Service Commission is affirmed, all costs to be paid by the appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth Fund III, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, H. Kerr Taylor, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, in the capacity as an officer of the General Partner of the
company, that, to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

|                   |     |                    |                                                                                                                                                                
|------------------ | --- | ------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2009 | By: | /s/ H. Kerr Taylor
|                   |     | Name:              | H. Kerr Taylor                                                                                                                                                 
|                   |     | Title              | President and Chief Executive Officer of AmREIT Monthly Income &
 Growth III Corporation, the General Partner of AmREIT Monthly Income &
 Growth Fund III, Ltd.

---
##### 



CERTIFICATION  CFO
    
    Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Robert C. FarenhemVice President and Secretary(principal financial and accounting officer)
February 27, 2007
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Armstrong, Christopher W <christopher.w.armstrong@exxonmobil.com>

Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 6:39 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Cc: Mintz, Tom

Subject: RE: Status of McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility -- PSD Permit

OK.  Thanks.  Chris.

From: Kelly, Shaheerah [mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 8:38 AM 

To: Armstrong, Christopher W 

Cc: Mintz, Tom 

Subject: RE: Status of McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility -- PSD Permit 

Mr. Armstrong ,

I cannot provide a schedule at this time.

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

From: Armstrong, Christopher W [mailto:christopher.w.armstrong@exxonmobil.com]  

Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 6:35 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Cc: Mintz, Tom

Subject: RE: Status of McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility ‐‐ PSD Permit

Ms. Kelly:

Any idea of when the permit is likely to be finalized?  Thanks, Chris.

From: Kelly, Shaheerah [mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 8:34 AM 

To: Armstrong, Christopher W 

Cc: Mintz, Tom 

Subject: RE: Status of McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility -- PSD Permit 

Mr. Armstrong,

EPA issued a proposed permit for public comment last year and has not yet issued the final permit. We will notify you

when the final permit is issued.
2

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

From: Armstrong, Christopher W [mailto:christopher.w.armstrong@exxonmobil.com]  

Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 5:54 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Cc: Mintz, Tom

Subject: Status of McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility ‐‐ PSD Permit

Can you tell me the likely issuance timing for the above‐referenced PSD permit?  Thanks, Chris.  

Christopher W. Armstrong 

Assistant Chief Attorney 

Environmental & Safety Law 

Exxon Mobil Corporation 

Energy 3 4A 505 

22777 Springwoods Village Parkway 

Spring, Texas 77389 

832.624.6429 Tel 

832.584.3886 Mobile 

christopher.w.armstrong@exxonmobil.com

This document may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are

not the intended recipient, you are on notice that any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking of any action in

reliance on the contents of this document is prohibited.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1694 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1694

  To allow the funding for the interoperable emergency communications 
 grant program established under the Digital Television Transition and 
 Public Safety Act of 2005 to remain available until expended through 
               fiscal year 2012, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2009

    Mr. Rockefeller (for himself and Mrs. Hutchison) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To allow the funding for the interoperable emergency communications 
 grant program established under the Digital Television Transition and 
 Public Safety Act of 2005 to remain available until expended through 
               fiscal year 2012, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PUBLIC SAFETY INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS GRANTS.

    (a) Notwithstanding section 3006(a)(2) of the Digital Television 
Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005 (47 U.S.C. 309 note), sums 
made available to administer the Public Safety Interoperable 
Communications Grant Program under section 309(j)(8)(E) of the 
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)(8)(E)) shall remain 
available until expended, but not beyond September 30, 2012.
    (b) The period for performance of any investment approved under the 
Program as of the date of enactment of this Act shall be extended by 
one year, but not later than September 30, 2011, except that the 
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information may 
extend, on a case-by-case basis, the period of performance for any 
investment approved under the Program as of that date for a period of 
not more than 2 years, but not later than September 30, 2012. In making 
a determination as to whether an extension beyond September 30, 2011, 
is warranted, the Assistant Secretary should consider the circumstances 
that gave rise to the need for the extension, the likelihood of 
completion of performance within the deadline for completion, and such 
other factors as the Assistant Secretary deems necessary to make the 
determination.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Nursing Research Special Emphasis Panel; Loan Repayment.                    

*Date:*                         March 30, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 1 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mario Rinaudo, M.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Review, National Inst of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd. (DEM 1), Suite 710, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-5973,                         *mrinaudo@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 22, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-4881 Filed 2-29-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Imre Eszenyi, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Chartwell International, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and    (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 8, 2006



/s/ Imre Eszenyi

Imre Eszenyi

Acting President and Chairman of the Board

(Principal Executive Officer)
Name: Percy Mondell Berry, III

Contact Info:

Address - 20 Wright’s Point Circle

Beaufort, SC 29902

Email: tberry@gmka.com

Cell Phone: 803-513-2242

I am a Licensed Private Pilot with an instrument rating, a Licensed Registered 

Professional Engineer in South Carolina and North Carolina, a Licensed Merchant 

Mariner Captain with 100 ton credentials, and have a Transportation Worker’s 

Identification Card. I am also the president at a Design-Build Construction Business that 

develops properties.

I operate a DSI Phantom Vision 2 Plus Drone recreationally and would like to use it to 

photograph our construction sites for our clients and our own use and potentially real 

estate properties for sale or for preliminary evaluation.

I wish to apply for exemption of Sections 61.23(a), 61.113(a)(b), 91.121, 91.151(b), 

91.405, 91.409, 91.407 and 91.417 of 14 CFR to operate a DSI Phantom 2 Vision Plus 

unmanned aircraft pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 

2012.

Full relief from these sections is sought as the following procedures will be used to 

provide the alternate controls, monitors, and observations as follows:

- Preflight inspections will be made for each flight to insure controllability of 

flight.

 Inspect rotor blades

 Observe battery strength

 Insure connection between controller and aircraft

 Insure sufficient GPS signal

 Calibrate the compass

- Flights will be made by only authorized repair facilities.

- Altitude of aircraft will be monitored on the controller.

It is believed that granting the relief of these sections would enable real estate properties 

to be better viewed by prospective purchasers.

The operations of this aircraft would not adversely affect safety as the provisions would 

be monitored by preflight inspections and aircraft inspections, altitude monitoring, and 

VFR flight by a licensed pilot.
A summary of the exemption request: 

For an Exemption of Sections 61.23(a), 61.113(a)(b), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405, 91.409, 

91.407 and 91.417 concerning operation of DSI Phantom 2 Vision Plus unmanned 

aircraft system pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 

2012 (Public Law 112-95).

Percy M. Berry, III

20 Wright’s Point Circle

Beaufort, SC 29902

803-513-2242