53480 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 172 / Friday, September 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

potential impacts to stakeholders/

licensees from implementing any of the 

desired regulatory changes described in 

this draft regulatory basis (e.g., what 

would be a reasonable cost estimate for 

implementation of the cyber security 

programs, including startup and annual 

costs)? 

• The NRC staff is aware of licensee 

voluntary efforts to address cyber 

security. Is there additional information 

related to these efforts that would 

inform the NRC staff’s assessment or 

analysis? 

IV. Cumulative Effects of Regulation 

The Cumulative Effects of Regulation 

(CER) describes the challenges that 

licensees or other impacted entities 

(such as State agency partners) may face 

while implementing new regulatory 

positions, programs, and requirements 

(e.g., rules, generic letters, backfits, 

inspections). The CER is an 

organizational effectiveness challenge 

that results from a licensee or impacted 

entity implementing a number of 

complex positions, programs, or 

requirements within a limited 

implementation period and with 

available resources (which may include 

limited available expertise to address a 

specific issue). The NRC has 

implemented CER enhancements to the 

rulemaking process to facilitate public 

involvement throughout the rulemaking 

process. Therefore, the NRC is 

specifically requesting comment on the 

cumulative effects that may result from 

this proposed rulemaking. In developing 

comments on the draft regulatory basis, 

consider the following questions: 

(1) In light of any current or projected 

CER challenges, what should be a 

reasonable effective date, compliance 

date, or submittal date(s) from the time 

the final rule is published to the actual 

implementation of any new proposed 

requirements, including changes to 

programs, procedures, or the facility? 

(2) If current or projected CER 

challenges exist, what should be done to 

address this situation (e.g., if more time 

is required to implement the new 

requirements, what period of time 

would be sufficient, and why such a 

time frame is necessary)? 

(3) Do other regulatory actions (e.g., 

orders, generic communications, license 

amendment requests, and inspection 

findings of a generic nature) by NRC or 

other agencies influence the 

implementation of the potential 

proposed requirements? 

(4) Are there unintended 

consequences? Does the potential 

proposed action create conditions that 

would be contrary to the potential 

proposed action’s purpose and 

objectives? If so, what are the 

consequences and how should they be 

addressed? 

Please provide information on the 

costs and benefits of the potential 

proposed action. This information will 

be used to support any regulatory 

analysis by the NRC. 

V. Availability of Documents 

The NRC may post additional 

materials related to this rulemaking 

activity to the Federal rulemaking Web 

site at www.regulations.gov under 

Docket ID NRC–2015–0179. By making 

these documents publicly available, the 

NRC seeks to inform stakeholders of the 

current status of the NRC’s rulemaking 

development activities and to provide 

preparatory material for future public 

meetings. 

The Federal rulemaking Web site 

allows you to receive alerts when 

changes or additions occur in a docket 

folder. To subscribe: (1) Navigate to the 

docket folder (NRC–2015–0179); (2) 

click the ‘‘Sign up for Email Alerts’’ 

link; and (3) enter your email address 

and select how frequently you would 

like to receive emails (daily, weekly, or 

monthly). 

VI. Plain Writing 

The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub. 

L. 111–274) requires Federal agencies to 

write documents in a clear, concise, 

well-organized manner. The NRC has 

written this document to be consistent 

with the Plain Writing Act as well as the 

Presidential Memorandum, ‘‘Plain 

Language in Government Writing,’’ 

published in the Federal Register on 

June 10, 1998 (63 FR 31883). The NRC 

requests comment on this document 

with respect to the clarity and 

effectiveness of the language used. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day 

of August, 2015. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Marissa G. Bailey, 

Director, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, 

Safeguards, and Environmental Review, 

Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and 

Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. 2015–22051 Filed 9–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2015–3073; Directorate 

Identifier 2015–CE–017–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air 

Limited Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

that published in the Federal Register. 

That NPRM applies to Viking Air 

Limited Model DHC–3 airplanes. The 

repetitive inspection column in ‘‘Table 

1 of Paragraph (f)(3) of This AD— 

Inspection Schedule’’ contains data that 

is intended to apply to all conditions. 

However, the way the table is displayed 

makes it look as if it only applies to the 

first condition. This document corrects 

it to assure that it applies to all 

conditions. In all other respects, the 

original document remains the same. 

DATES: The last date for submitting 

comments to the NPRM (80 FR 44892, 

July 28, 2015) remains September 11, 

2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Viking Air 

Limited Technical Support, 1959 De 

Havilland Way, Sidney, British 

Columbia, Canada, V8L 5V5; Fax: 250– 

656–0673; telephone: (North America) 

1–800–663–8444; email: 

technical.support@vikingair.com; 

Internet: http://www.vikingair.com/

support/service-bulletins. It is also 

available on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– 

3073.You may view this referenced 

service information at the FAA, Small 


rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 172 / Friday, September 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules 53481 

Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, 

Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call (816) 329– 

4148. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– 

3073; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 

(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aziz 

Ahmed, Aerospace Safety Engineer, 

FAA, New York Aircraft Certification 

Office (ACO), 1600 Steward Avenue, 

Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; 

telephone: (516) 228–7329; fax: (516) 

794–5531; email: aziz.ahmed@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 

28, 2015, a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) (80 FR 44892) was 

published in the Federal Register to 

apply to Viking Air Limited Model 

DHC–3 airplanes. That NPRM proposed 

to require installing additional wing 

inspection access panels and inspecting 

the wings using borescope and visual 

methods with corrective action as 

necessary. 

As published, the repetitive 

inspection column in ‘‘Table 1 of 

Paragraph (f)(3) of This AD—Inspection 

Schedule’’ contains data that when 

displayed makes it look as if the 

repetitive inspections only apply to the 

first condition, whereas when printed 

shows that it applies to all conditions. 

To correct this, we are including the 

data in each condition. 

Although no other part of the 

preamble or regulatory information has 

been corrected, we are publishing the 

entire NPRM (80 FR 44892, July 28, 

2015) in the Federal Register. 

The last date for submitting comments 

to the NPRM (80 FR 44892, July 28, 

2015) remains September 11, 2015. 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

Viking Air Limited: Docket No. FAA–2015– 

3073; Directorate Identifier 2015–CE– 

017–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by September 

11, 2015. The date as originally published in 

the NPRM (80 FR 44892, July 28, 2015). 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Viking Air Limited 

DHC–3 airplanes, all serial numbers, 

certificated in any category. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association of America 

(ATA) Code 57: Wings. 

(e) Reason 

This AD was prompted by mandatory 

continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) 

originated by an aviation authority of another 

country to identify and correct an unsafe 

condition on an aviation product. The MCAI 

describes the unsafe condition as reports of 

corrugation cracking found at various wing 

stations and on the main spar lower cap. We 

are issuing this proposed AD to detect 

cracking and correct as necessary to address 

the unsafe condition on these products. 

(f) Actions and Compliance 

Unless already done, do the following 

actions in paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(5) of 

this AD: 

(1) Within 30 days after the effective date 

of this AD, determine the accumulated air 

time for each wing by contacting Technical 

Support at Viking Air Limited. You can find 

contact information for Viking Air Limited in 

paragraph (h) of this AD. 

(2) Within 30 days after the effective date 

of this AD, determine all installed 

supplemental type certificates (STC) or 

modifications affecting the wings. Based on 

the accumulated air time determined from 

paragraph (f)(1) of this AD and before the 

initial inspection required in paragraph (f)(3) 

of this AD, install access panels as follows: 

(i) If the airplane is free of STCs or any 

other modifications affecting the wings, 

install additional inspection access panels 

following the Accomplishment Instructions 

Part A of Viking DHC–3 Otter Service 

Bulletin No. V3/0002, Revision ‘‘C’’, dated 

April 30, 2014. 

(ii) If the airplane is fitted with STC 

SA2009NY (which can be found on the 

Internet at: http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_

and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/F7309

B7D9B008C588625734F00730144?Open

Document&Highlight=sa02009ny), 

incorporate additional inspection access 

panels following the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Viking Air Limited SB 3–STC 

(03–50)-001, Revision ‘‘NC’’, dated April 30, 

2014. 

Note 1 to paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this AD: 

STC SA03–50 would be the Canadian 

equivalent of the United States STC 

2A2009NY. 

(iii) If there are other STCs or 

modifications affecting the wings the 

operator must contact the FAA to request an 

FAA-approved alternative method of 

compliance using the procedures in 

paragraph (g)(1) of this AD and 14 CFR 39.19. 

To develop these procedures, we recommend 

you contact the STC holder for guidance in 

developing substantiating data. 

(3) Based on the accumulated air time on 

the wings determined in paragraph (f)(1) of 

this AD, perform initial and repetitive 

borescope and visual inspections of both the 

left-hand and right-hand wing box following 

Part B of the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Viking DHC–3 Otter Service Bulletin V3/

0002, Revision ‘‘C’’, dated April 30, 2014, 

using the inspection schedules specified in 

Table 1 of paragraph (f)(3) of this AD: 

TABLE 1 OF PARAGRAPH (F)(3) OF THIS AD—INSPECTION SCHEDULE

Effectivity Initial inspection Repetitive inspection 

If Viking Air Limited SB V3/0002, Revision ‘‘A’’, 

dated February 22, 2013; or Viking Air Limited SB V3/0002, Revision ‘‘B’’, dated July 3, 

2013; were complied with prior to the effective date of this AD.

The initial inspection is not required since the 

inspection was accomplished while complying with Revision ‘‘A’’ or ‘‘B’’ of Viking Air 

Limited SB V3/0002.

Repetitively inspect not to exceed every 1,600 

wing air time hours accumulated after the 

last inspection or 2,100 flight cycles after 

the last inspection, whichever occurs first. 

If, as of the effective date of this AD, the airplane has less than 31,200 wing air time 

hours.

Inspect within 800 wing air time hours after 

the effective date of this AD, or within 6 

months after the effective date of this AD, 

whichever occurs first.

Repetitively inspect not to exceed every 1,600 

wing air time hours accumulated after the 

last inspection or 2,100 flight cycles after 

the last inspection, whichever occurs first. 

If, as of the effective date of this AD, the airplane has 31,200 hours wing air time or more 

but less than 31,600 hours wing air time 

hours.

Inspect upon or before accumulating 32,000 

wing air time hours or within 6 months after 

the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.

Repetitively inspect not to exceed every 1,600 

wing air time hours accumulated after the 

last inspection or 2,100 flight cycles after 

the last inspection, whichever occurs first. 


rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
53482 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 172 / Friday, September 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

1 64 FR 59888 (November 3, 1999). 

2 16 CFR part 312. 

3 78 FR 3972 (January 17, 2013). 

TABLE 1 OF PARAGRAPH (F)(3) OF THIS AD—INSPECTION SCHEDULE—Continued 

Effectivity Initial inspection Repetitive inspection 

If, as of the effective date of this AD, the airplane has 31,600 wing air time hours or more.Inspect within 400 wing air time hours accumulated after the effective date of this AD 

or 3 months after the effective date of this 

AD, whichever occurs first.

Repetitively inspect not to exceed every 1,600 

wing air time hours accumulated after the 

last inspection or 2,100 flight cycles after 

the last inspection, whichever occurs first. 

(4) If the total flight cycles have not been 

kept, multiply the total number of airplane 

hours time-in-service (TIS) by 2 to calculate 

the cycles. For the purpose of this AD, some 

examples are below: 

(i) .5 hour TIS × 2 = 1 cycle; and 

(ii) 200 hours TIS × 2 = 400 cycles. 

(5) If any cracks are found, contact 

Technical Support at Viking Air Limited for 

an FAA-approved repair and incorporate the 

repair before further flight. You can find 

contact information for Viking Air Limited in 

paragraph (i) of this AD. The FAA-approved 

repair must specifically reference this AD. 

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, 

FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs 

for this AD, if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to 

ATTN: Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Safety 

Engineer, FAA, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Steward 

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 

11590; telephone: (516) 228–7329; fax: (516) 

794–5531; email: aziz.ahmed@faa.gov. Before 

using any approved AMOC on any airplane 

to which the AMOC applies, notify your 

appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the 

FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), 

or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, a federal 

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a 

person is not required to respond to, nor 

shall a person be subject to a penalty for 

failure to comply with a collection of 

information subject to the requirements of 

the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that 

collection of information displays a current 

valid OMB Control Number. The OMB 

Control Number for this information 

collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for 

this collection of information is estimated to 

be approximately 5 minutes per response, 

including the time for reviewing instructions, 

completing and reviewing the collection of 

information. All responses to this collection 

of information are mandatory. Comments 

concerning the accuracy of this burden and 

suggestions for reducing the burden should 

be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence 

Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: 

Information Collection Clearance Officer, 

AES–200. 

(h) Related Information 

Refer to MCAI Transport Canada AD No. 

CF–2015–05, dated March 18, 2015. You may 

examine the MCAI on the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–3073. 

For service information related to this AD, 

contact Viking Air Limited Technical 

Support, 1959 De Havilland Way, Sidney, 

British Columbia, Canada, V8L 5V5; Fax: 

250–656–0673; telephone: (North America) 

1–800–663–8444; email: technical.support@

vikingair.com; Internet: http://www.vikingair.

com/support/service-bulletins. You may 

review this referenced service information at 

the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 

Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 

28, 2015. 

Earl Lawrence, 

Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2015–21934 Filed 9–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

16 CFR Part 312 

RIN 3084–AB20 

Children’s Online Privacy Protection 

Rule Proposed Parental Consent 

Method; Jest8 Limited Trading as 

Riyo’s Application for Approval of 

Parental Consent Method; Extension of 

Comment Period 

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission 

(FTC or Commission). 

ACTION: Extension of comment period. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Trade 

Commission is extending the comment 

period concerning the proposed 

parental consent method submitted by 

Jest8 Limited, trading as Riyo (‘‘Riyo’’), 

under the Voluntary Commission 

Approval Processes provision of the 

Children’s Online Privacy Protection 

Rule. 

DATES: Written comments on the request 

for public comment published August 7, 

2015 (80 FR 47429) must be received on 

or before September 14, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a 

comment at http://

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/

riyocoppaconsent online or on paper, by 

following the instructions in the 

Request for Comment part of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below. Write ‘‘Jest8 Limited Trading as 

Riyo’s Application for Parental Consent 

Method, Project No. P–155405’’ on your 

comment, and file your comment online 

at http://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/

ftc/riyocoppaconsent by following the 

instructions on the Web-based form. If 

you prefer to file your comment on 

paper, write ‘‘Jest8 Limited Trading as 

Riyo’s Application for Parental Consent 

Method, Project No. P–155405’’ on your 

comment and on the envelope, and mail 

your comment to the following address: 

Federal Trade Commission, Office of the 

Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue 

NW, Suite CC–5610 (Annex E), 

Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your 

comment to the following address: 

Federal Trade Commission, Office of the 

Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th 

Street SW., 5th Floor, Suite 5610 

(Annex E), Washington, DC 20024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Miry Kim, Attorney, (202) 326–3622, 

Division of Privacy and Identity 

Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC 20580. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Section A. Background 

On October 20, 1999, the Commission 

issued its final Rule 1 pursuant to the 

Children’s Online Privacy Protection 

Act, 15 U.S.C. 6501 et seq., which 

became effective on April 21, 2000.2 On 

December 19, 2012, the Commission 

amended the Rule, and these 

amendments became effective on July 1, 

2013.3 The Rule requires certain Web 

site operators to post privacy policies 

and provide notice, and to obtain 

verifiable parental consent, prior to 

collecting, using, or disclosing personal 

information from children under the age 

of 13. The Rule enumerates methods for 

obtaining verifiable parental consent, 

while also allowing an interested party 

to file a written request for Commission 


rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS