alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 Defendant Ramon Terrell Daniels did not petition for rehearing, as we have already

remanded both of his counts (Count 1 and Count 8) for resentencing. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-30413

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAMON TERRELL DANIELS; JECARLOS MONTRAE CARTER; TENISHA

DESHEA CARTER; ANTONIO DEMETRIOUS FURLOW; GRANSIHI DEON

MIMS, also known as Granshi; AUBURN THOMAS, also known as Big, 

Defendants-Appellants

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:

In thisPetition for Panel Rehearing, Defendants JeCarlos Montrae Carter,

Tenisha Deshea Carter, Antonio Demetrious Furlow, Gransihi Deon Mims, and

Auburn Thomas argue that the sentences on their substantive counts should be

vacated and remanded for resentencing because those sentences are intertwined

with their now-vacated sentences on the conspiracy count.1In other words, they

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 5, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 12-30413

2

argue that in addition to being resentenced on the conspiracy count, they are

entitled to be resentenced on their substantive counts as well. While arguing

that resentencing on the substantive counts is not required, the Government

does not oppose vacating the sentences on the substantive counts and agrees

that defendants should have their offense levels recalculated because, using

grouping principles, their Guidelines range calculations were driven by the

conspiracy’s now-vacated 5 kilogram finding.

Accordingly, we VACATE the sentences of all defendants and REMAND

the case for resentencing consistent with this Order. The Petition for Panel

Rehearing is GRANTED to this extent and this extent only. The Petition is

otherwise denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

*Board Action:*                     Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the  Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as  amended, and the FASAB Rules of Procedure, as amended in  October, 2010, notice is hereby given that the Federal  Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has released  the Exposure Draft,                     *Accounting for Impairment of General**Property, Plant, and Equipment Remaining in Use.*

                    The Exposure Draft is available on the FASAB home page                     *http://www.fasab.gov/​board-activities/​documents-for-comment/​exposure-drafts-and-documents-for-comment/​.*                     Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350. Respondents are encouraged to comment on any part of the exposure draft. Written comments on the Exposure Draft are requested by May 28, 2012. Comments on the Exposure Drafts should be sent to: Wendy M. Payne, Executive Director, Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, 441 G Street NW., Suite 6814, Mail Stop 6K17V, Washington, DC 20548.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wendy Payne, Executive  Director, at (202) 512-7350.

Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463.

Dated: February 28, 2012.

Charles Jackson,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-5144 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 21.0

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


The following are descriptions of subsidiaries which are directly or indirectly
owned by the Company.

BFS Preferred Capital Corp. BFS Preferred Capital Corp. is a subsidiary of BFS
and was organized under Massachusetts law in 1998 as a real estate investment
trust, in satisfaction of Section 858 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended.

BNB Preferred Capital Corp. BNB Preferred Capital Corp. is a subsidiary of BNB
and was organized under Massachusetts law in 1998 as a real estate investment
trust, in satisfaction of Section 858 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended.

BFS Security Corp. BFS Security Corp. is a subsidiary of BFS and was organized
under Massachusetts law in 1998 as an investment subsidiary.

BNB Security Corp. BNB Security Corp. is a subsidiary of BNB and was organized
under Massachusetts law in 1998 as an investment subsidiary.

BF Funding Corporation. BF Funding Corporation is a subsidiary of the Company
and was organized under Massachusetts law in 1995 for purposes of funding the
BFS' ESOP plan.

Diversified Ventures, Inc. d/b/a Forward Financial Company. Forward Financial
Company was acquired by BFS in December 1999. It is incorporated under
Massachusetts law and operates as a subsidiary of BFS.

Ellsmere Insurance Agency, Inc. Ellsmere Insurance Agency, Inc. was acquired by
BNB in December 1999. It is incorporated under Massachusetts law and operates as
a subsidiary of BNB.

Leader Corporation. Leader Corporation is incorporated under Massachusetts law
and is a subsidiary of BFS.

BFS Service Corp. BFS Service Corp. was a subsidiary of BFS organized under
Massachusetts law. In November 1999, BFS Service Corp. was dissolved.

Agyro Corp. Agyro Corp. was a subsidiary of BNB organized under Massachusetts
law. In November 1999, Agyro Corp. was dissolved.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Tronox Incorporated;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on our
evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ Mary Mikkelson

Mary MikkelsonChief Financial OfficerAugust 11, 2008
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0234 KATRINA SULLIVAN, a/k/a KATRINA JORGENSEN,

Plaintiff and Appellee ,

- vs - O R D E R PENNY WEYMILLER and LARRY McGILL,

Defendants and Appellants . Appellee Katrina Sullivan has filed an unopposed motion for an extension o f time to file her Response Brief in the referenced matter. Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for extension is GRANTED. Appellee has until September 16, 2020 within which to file her Response Brief. DATED this

__ day of August , 2020. For the Court, By : _______________________________

Chief Justice

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court August 12 2020

08/12/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0234
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-2640

_____________________________

THEODORE J. THOMPSON,

Appellant,

v.

ADMIRAL MANUFACTURING 

HOUSING COMMUNITY; BRANDI 

PARKER,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Gary L. Bergosh, Judge.

September 20, 2019

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Dedge v. Crosby, 914 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA 

2005) (holding mere phrase "with prejudice" does not make a final 

order of an order merely granting a motion); Johnson v. First City 

Bank of Gainesville, 491 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (holding 

that an order granting a motion to dismiss with prejudice is “an 

order granting a motion, not an order dismissing the action” and 

is not final or appealable).

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Theodore J. Thompson, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellees.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.88 MB)

Tags:AbilityOne, DSCC, Defense Supply Center Columbus, L&M EEO

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 12724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5049]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE\TM\

39 CFR Part 20


International Postal Service--Global Expedited Package Services 
(GEPS) Contracts

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service will revise Mailing Standards of the United 
States Postal Service, International Mail Manual (IMM[supreg]) to 
incorporate a change concerning the requirements that a mailer must 
meet in order to qualify for a Global Expedited Package Services (GEPS) 
contract.

DATES: Effective date: April 1, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret M. Falwell, 202-268-2576.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
gives notice that, on January 30, 2012, the Postal Service filed with 
the Postal Regulatory Commission a notice of a minor classification 
change for the international competitive product Global Expedited 
Package Services (GEPS) Contracts. The minor classification change 
concerns the requirements that a mailer must meet in order to qualify 
for a GEPS contract. This change is designed for consistency with 
published commercial plus pricing discounts for Express Mail 
International and Priority Mail International. The Commission concurred 
with the notice in its Order No. 1225, issued on February 10, 2012. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket No. MC2012-8.

List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 20

    Foreign relations, International postal services.

    Accordingly, 39 CFR Part 20 is amended as follows:

PART 20--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 20 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 552(a); 13 U.S.C. 301-307; 18 U.S.C. 1692-
1737; 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 407, 414, 416, 3001-3011, 3201-
3219, 3403-3406, 3621, 3622, 3626, 3632, 3633, and 5001.


0
2. Revise the following sections of Mailing Standards of the United 
States Postal Service, International Mail Manual (IMM), as follows:
* * * * *

2 Conditions for Mailing

* * * * *

297 Customized Agreements

* * * * *

297.2 Qualifying Mailers

[Revise IMM 297.2 as follows:]

    To qualify for a GEPS contract, a mailer must be capable, on an 
annualized basis, of paying at least $200,000 in international postage 
to the Postal Service.
* * * * *
    We will publish an amendment to 39 CFR part 20 to reflect these 
changes.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice.
[FR Doc. 2012-5049 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
- 372 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

GARRISON v. OTTO

Cite as 308 Neb. 372

Margaret L. Garrison, appellee, v. 

Logan M. Otto II, appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed February 5, 2021. No. S-20-386.

Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: John 

A. Colborn, Judge. Affirmed.

Edith T. Peebles, of Brodkey, Cuddigan, Peebles, Belmont & 

Line, L.L.P., for appellant.

Adam R. Little, of Ballew Hazen, P.C., L.L.O., for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, 

Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal of a domestic abuse protection order, which 

we moved to our docket. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1106(3) 

(Cum. Supp. 2018).

The court, having considered the oral arguments and having reviewed the record de novo, finds that the domestic abuse 

protection order entered by the trial court should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

03/05/2021 01:09 AM CST
Exhibit 24.5



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Lionel Reilly, or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my
name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2003, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with
respect to the registration of the common stock of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd., and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 24th day
of October, 2003.



/s/    Michael B. DavisMichael B. Davis




|STATE OF IOWA     |  | )           
|----------------- |  | ------------
|                  |  | )        ss.
|COUNTY OF CARROLL |  | )           



On this
 day of October, 2003, before me, a Notary Public qualified for said County, personally came Michael B. Davis, known to me to be the identical person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the execution
thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.



/s/    Jennifer J. WallcupNotary PublicMy commission expires:5-7-04
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form SB-2)pertaining to the 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan and 1995 Non-employeeDirector Stock Incentive Plan (No.33-94540-LA), and theRegistration Statements (Forms S-8) pertaining to the 1995 Employee StockPurchase Plan (No. 333-80783), 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (No. 333-43145),1999 Non-employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (No. 333-88627),2000 Stock Incentive Plan, 2000 Transition Stock Incentive Plan for Officers,and the 2000 Transition Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Officers (No. 333-48264)of Cutter & Buck Inc. of our reports dated July 6,2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofCutter & Buck Inc., Cutter & Buck Inc. management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Cutter & Buck Inc.included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended April 30,2005.
|                     | /s/ ERNST &  YOUNG LLP |
|---------------------|---------------------------------|
| Seattle, Washington |                            |
| July 11,  2005 |                            |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32 .01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Microelectronics Technology Company (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"),

I, Wei-Chieh Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial  condition  and result of  operations of
the Company.

  /s/ Wei-Chieh Wang
      --------------
      Wei-Chieh Wang
Director & Chief Executive Officer

November 10, 2010














EXHIBIT 32 .02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Microelectronics Technology Company., (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"),

I, Albert Ng, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial  condition  and result of  operations of
the Company.

/s/ Albert Ng
    ---------
    Albert Ng
Director & Chief Financial Officer

November 10, 2010
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00018-CR

No. 02-22-00019-CR

On Appeal from the 235th District Court

Cooke County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR21-00132, CR21-00133

ORDER

AMENDED ABATEMENT ORDER

We have considered “Motion To Abate Appeal In Order To Obtain 

Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law.”

The motion is GRANTED.

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and direct the trial court to prepare written

findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The trial court shall file a record in this court on or before Friday, 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

JOSEPH TURNER
2

September 30, 2022. The record shall include a supplemental clerk’s record

containing the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and a

supplemental reporter's record of any hearings on this matter. Upon our receipt of 

the supplemental record, the appeal of this cause shall be reinstated automatically 

without further order.

We direct the clerk of this court to send a notice of this order to the 

attorneys of record, the trial court judge, the trial court clerk, and the court 

reporter.

Dated August 1, 2022.

Per Curiam