alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AQS$ID Site$Name 10/15/2010:$Not$Submitted

2/19/113/12/2011:$Local$Activity7/2/2011:$Tribal$Only7/3/117/4/117/5/117/6/117/7/117/8/117/18/118/3/118/5/2011: Not$Submitted$8/18/118/25/118/26/118/27/118/28/119/2/119/6/2011:$Not$Submitted9/11/119/12/1110/4/1111/2/2011:$Not$Submitted11/4/111/21/2012:$Proposed$No$Action1/22/2012:$Proposed$No$Action2/27/124/3/2012:$Local$Ag$Activity4/4/2012:$Local$Ag$Activity6/16/126/18/2012:$Local$Activity6/27/127/11/128/6/2012:$Not$Submitted8/11/128/14/129/6/12NonAEvent$Exceedance$CountViolation$Day$Count

4A21A3002A1 Apache$Junction$ C 0 1

4A21A3002A3 Apache$Junction$A$TEOM6 C C C 1 C 1 5

4A13A4011A1 Buckeye C C C 1 C C C C C C 1 2 11

4A13A3002A4 Central$Phoenix C C C C C C C C C 0 9

4A13A9812A1 Durango$Complex C C C C C C C C C C C C 0 12

4A13A4010A1 Dysart C C C C C C 0 6

4A13A2001A1 Glendale C C C C C C 0 6

4A13A3010A1 Greenwood 1 C C C C C C C C C 1 10

4A13A4006A1 Higley C C C C C C C C 1 C C C 1 12

4A13A9997A3 JLG$Supersite$A$BAM1020 C C C C C 0 5

4A13A9997A4 JLG$Supersite$A$TEOM5 C C C C C C C 0 7

4A13A1003A1 Mesa 0 0

4A13A1003A2 Mesa$A$TEOM1 0 0

4A13A1004A1 North$Phoenix C C C 0 3

4A13A1004A2 North$Phoenix$A$TEOM2 C C 0 2

4A13A4003A1 South$Phoenix 1 C C C C C C C C C C C 1 12

4A13A3003A1 South$Scottsdale 0 0

4A13A3003A2 South$Scottsdale$A$TEOM3 0 0

4A13A4005A1 Tempe4 C 0 1

4A13A4009A1 West$43rd$ C C C C C C C 1 C C 1 C C C 2 14

4A13A4004A1 West$Chandler C C C C C C C C C C C 1 1 C C C 2 16

4A13A0019A1 West$Phoenix C C C C C C C C C 0 9

4A13A4016A1 Zuni$Hills$ C C 1 C C 1 5

14 1 11 2 1

1 8 1 4 13 1 9 2 10 2 17 1

5 3 7 13 4 2 2 1

Total$#$Exceedances

69

29

37

135

Demonstration$1:$September$6,$2012$Concurrance

Demonstration$2:$May$6,$2013$Concurrance

Demonstration$3:$July$1,$29013$Concurrance
Ron. Tom&Berry, Member Stafe Board of Control Opinion MO. a182 .kustln, Texas Ret E ’umbase of Plc!nap truuk D%arsire Your letter of Gatober jl asks th%s department whether a coupe 

## pickup truck may be mchased by you at a
eride exoeedlng $7~.00 (ticludlng the trade-in value of he used ear) und,er the provisions of Section 2, subaectlon X4, General Prwlsions, Senate Bill 423, Aots Regular Sesa%cm 47th Legislature, reading as followsr n(l4) Uurcbase of passenger ears. Moo moneys herein approprlatsd shall be spent for the purehuae of a passenger ear in excess f9r Sevsn QWred P’lfty ($750.00) Dollars, including the frade-in velue of t&e used ear, **and** t&r UrLted pr%ce shall cwer a aar equi.p ed rlth

and extra rim or wheel but LIQ an extra e or ‘tube.” 7th advise that the .picSuxp ?XW@ 5s aonticted exaotly like a passenger soUpa with the *xnexptitm that it paG%&trdk body behin&the **seat** ratker than the Bfi You alsa advise thag *heha Chrwliet ~truek & a book as w& as the automobIle dealer* P market record, elasiaify <ha plekup as a commercial motor TehlCle~.

Under the above r3.d~~ it is oux spfnicm that the queetlon whether the automoblle iwofved im a ~npaarengerear” is to be determIned by condderirrg its desiga and~ean&ru~lon. XXit; is derigned and construeted by the.. msnuf ’acturer for the prtmary use of oqrrylng paasengeirs It is. ‘8 “passengBF aarm, and within the rUer; if if ‘ie dedgned ‘and aaostr~ted for the ~pr%mary

purpose of transporting property, it Ir not tiWi.n the ridur q-ted.

The pickup coupe debaribedl we 

## balim, $8 clearlp designed and constructed priBlerri1 fog! ‘use ln trans@ing property; hence it is not wI.th3.n fhe ri.der.

we awnate that the .mh%de is 

## tobe used ~OZtha pose far whioh It la deslaed. Weda not meen to etV&ViSt tE-

### Ron.TomDeBerry-Page2

the above,

ridermay be evaded by pnrchas3ng

a vehioledesigned and construeted

primarily

for 

### the pUrpoaeof tramportiag

property,

with~the

purpose

to use the veh.%kle

xclusfvuly

for the $mnsportatlonof passengers. We returnto you herewith the emlosnres appended to your letterof request.. Yoursvery truly Al'TORHJ3YGElfEiUL

OF!CIiXkS By /s/ B. 

## W.Falmblld R. W. FalrcMld,Assistant
<PAGE>

           Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Statement of Additional Information
and the incorporation by reference therein and to the use of our report dated
February 27, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of IDS
Life Insurance Company (name subsequently changed to RiverSource Life
Insurance Company) and to the use of our report dated March 31, 2006 with
respect to the financial statements of American Enterprise Variable Annuity
Account (name subsequently changed to RiverSource Variable Annuity Account) in
the Initial Registration Statement on Form N-4 for the registration of
RiverSource(SM) Galaxy Premier Variable Annuity offered by RiverSource Life
Insurance Company.

                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                     Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 2, 2007
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ACTION LOSS MITIGATION, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK, 

AS SUCCESSOR TO JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR FIRST FRANKLIN MORTGAGE LOAN 

TRUST 2004-FF10,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1679

[April 19, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Dina A. Keever-Agrama, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502015CA13314XXXXMB.

Evan B. Plotka of Evan B. Plotka, P.L., Hollywood, for appellant.

Shawn Taylor of DeLuca Law Group, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

(Principal Accounting Officer)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Platinum Research Organization, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify that the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report):



| | 1. | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|/s/ John T. Jaeger, Jr.                                            
|John T. Jaeger, Jr.                                                
|President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)

March 31, 2008

|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|/s/ David A. Hart                                                           
|David A. Hart                                                               
|Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)

March 31, 2008
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Adagio Acquisition I, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
      P. Dioguardi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                William P. Dioguardi
              -----------------------------------
              William
                P. Dioguardi
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              August
                16, 2006
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2011 

p0620 

Order 

 

June 28, 2011 

142738 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142738 

 COA: 301331 

Kalamazoo CC: 09-000435-FH 

BRYAN KEITH COX, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 26, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04488

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

04488\04488_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04488\04488_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04488\04488_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04488\04488_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04488\Certification Statement Plant ID 04488.pdf Plant certification statement

04488\Supplemental Documents\04488_Part A A5-2 Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04488\Supplemental Documents\04488_Part A A5-2 Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04488\Supplemental Documents\04488_Part A A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04488\Supplemental Documents\04488_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04488\04488_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04488\04488_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 10.1


 





 


	
  Kari Heerdt

  16612 Green Dolphin Lane

  Cornelius, NC 28031

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  P.O. Box 110526

  4101 Research Commons

  79 TW Alexander Drive

  Research Triangle Park

  North Carolina 27709

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  February 24, 2010

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Lawrence D. Stern

  Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

  Tel 919.316.6668

  Fax 919.316.6669

  lawrence.stern@talecris.com

  



 


Dear
Kari:


 


Your
employment agreement, entered January 21, 2008, and amended and restated
on November 26, 2008, between you and Talecris Biotherapeutics Holdings
Corp. (“Agreement”) expires on April 1, 2010.


 


The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has authorized me to give you
notice of renewal pursuant to Section 2 of the Agreement to extend the
Agreement through April 1, 2011 on the same terms as contained in the
Agreement, except as follows:


 


(1)     The second sentence of Section 4.2 of the Agreement shall
be amended to read as follows:


 


“The Executive’s target bonus shall be 65% of base
salary (the “Target Bonus”), with the actual amount of each Bonus being
determined under the Bonus Plan in effect at that time as approved by the
Board.”


 


(2)     Section 4.8 shall be amended to read in its entirety as
follows:


 


“The Executive may commute from a primary residence
located in Charlotte NC metro area or other location as approved by the CEO.
The Executive will be permitted to travel back and forth weekly, and the
Company shall reimburse the cost. From time to time, the Executive shall be
expected to attend employee and/or community events over the weekend in the
greater Raleigh area. The Company will provide temporary housing or reasonable
reimbursement for temporary housing. The expenses described in Section 4.8
will be grossed up to cover Executive’s federal and state income tax liability.
Reimbursement of relevant items, housing costs or reimbursement and gross-ups
of federal and state income tax liability shall all be in accordance with
relevant items of the Company’s Commuter Policy during the Term. The Executive
is expected to pay for all local living expenses not covered by the Company’s
Commuter Policy. The Executive shall apply for all reimbursements hereunder for
a particular calendar year not later than forty-five (45) days after it ends,
and payment shall occur not later than two and one-half months after the end of
the calendar year to which the reimbursable expenses relate.


 


If you agree with the terms of this renewal, please
sign both copies of this letter in the space provided below and return one copy
to me.


 


 


	
  Very truly
  yours,

  	
   

  	
  AGREED:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Lawrence
  Stern

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Lawrence Stern

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Kari Heerdt

  
	
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  Kari Heerdt

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  3/3/10

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  www.talecris.com
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. ss.1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bancorp of New Jersey, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2005 (the "Report") as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, we Joseph Kliminski, Chief Executive Officer, and Eric
Heyer, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and                                                                                                                                          
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial
statements included in such report.

|Date: | February 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Joseph KliminskiJoseph KliminskiChief Executive Officer                     
|----- | ----------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     
|Date: | February 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Eric B. HeyerEric B. Heyer	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2321

ERIC E. MILLER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF VIRGINIA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:17-cv-00610-HEH)

Submitted: February 22, 2018 Decided: February 26, 2018

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric E. Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Eric E. Miller seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil 

complaint without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 

28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 

541, 545-46 (1949). The order Miller seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, 

Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local 

Union 393, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal 

for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Torrey W. HOLLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-85-616.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Nov. 9, 1987.

*746E. Alvin Schay, Appellate Public Defender, Norman, for appellant.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., P. Kay Floyd, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

The appellant, Torrey W. Holland, was tried and convicted in the District Court of Woodward County for the crime of Injury of a Minor Child in Case No. CRF-84-91 and the jury returned a verdict of guilty and set punishment of ninety (90) days imprisonment in the county jail and a five hundred dollar ($500.00) fine. The trial court imposed an indeterminate sentence pursuant to the Nonviolent Intermediate Offender Act, 22 O.S.Supp.1984, § 995.1 et seq.

For his first assignment of error appellant asserts that the trial court erred in applying the Nonviolent Intermediate Offender Act because it is unconstitutional and invalid. In light of this Court’s ruling in *Swart v. State,*720 P.2d 1265 (Okl.Cr.1986), to which this writer dissented, holding that the Nonviolent Intermediate Offender Act is unconstitutional, we agree with appellant’s contention and find that this matter must be remanded for resen-tencing.

Appellant next alleges that the State presented insufficient evidence that he committed the crime of Injury of a Minor Child. We disagree. Appellant testified that he wilfully struck the two and one-half (21⁄2) year old child on the back, grabbed her by the throat and hit her in the mouth. His testimony was corroborated by the physical injuries observed and by the testimony of the child’s mother. A doctor who examined the child also testified that the child was indeed injured. Viewing this evidence in the light most favorable to the State, we are of the opinion that a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. *Spuehler v. State,*709 P.2d 202 (Okl.Cr.1985). This assignment of error is without merit.

Appellant finally urges that the trial court failed to instruct the jury that circumstantial evidence must be inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. We first observe that appellant failed to object to the instructions given and further failed to submit requested instructions; therefore, this assignment was waived. *Maghe v. State,*620 P.2d 433 (Okl.Cr.1980). Moreover, we have reviewed the instructions as a whole and find that they fairly state the applicable law. *Green v. State,*611 P.2d 262 (Okl.Cr.1980). This assignment is groundless.

*747The judgment is AFFIRMED, but this matter is REMANDED for RESENTENC-ING.

BRETT, P.J., and PARKS, J., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-11258 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TRACY L. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:99-CR-126-ALL-L

-------------------- August 24, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown has received a copy of counsel’s brief and motion but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               | China      YouTV Corp. |                                         |
|------------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                               |                   |                                         |   |
|                               | By:                    | /s/ James Wei                           |   |
|  Date:      November 13, 2008 |                   | Name: James      Wei                    |   |
|                               |                   | Title: Principal      Executive Officer |   |
|                               |                   |                                         |   |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NewPage Holding Corporation and NewPage Corporation (the
Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew L. Jesch, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Matthew L. Jesch   
|Matthew L. Jesch       
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 13, 2006