alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased Equipment Costs:

Tanks

Purchased Equipment Costs are the sum of the following cost elements:

(1) Pump Costs

(2) Tank Costs

(3) Chemical Feed System Costs

(4) Mixer Costs

(5) Clarifier Costs

(6) Filter Press Costs

(7) Sand Filter Costs

Legend

Each cost component includes the cost of freight and associated ancillary equipment such as piping, valves, and 

controllers.

This Excel workbook supports EPA's derivation of cost element (2) using information provided in response to the Steam 

Electric Survey.

The following worksheet develops the freight cost equation used for FRP tanks in the Steam Electric Cost Model. 

Information from the vendors (see DCNs SE01825.A10 and A12) was used to develop a relationship between freight cost 

per mile and tank volume. The vendors provided the maximum size of a tank (diameter, height, and volume) and the cost 

per mile associated with each tank diameter, for tanks of equivalent height and diameter. EPA then calculated the volume 

of each tank. The freight cost per mile was then plotted against tank volume to determine the relationship.

Vendor provided data. See DCNs SE01825.A10 and A12 for data used as the source for this 

analysis.
 valves, and 

ponse to the Steam 

 Cost Model. 

 between freight cost 

volume) and the cost 

calculated the volume 

d as the source for this 
diameter, ft radius, ft Bottom Surface Area, sq ft

Volume per foot 

of height, gal Height, ft Tank volume, gal

8 4 50.26548246 375.9858088 8 3007.88647

10 5 78.53981634 587.4778262 10 5874.778262

12 6 113.0973355 845.9680698 12 10151.61684

14 7 153.93804 1151.456539 14 16120.39155

42 21 1385.44236 10363.10885 25 259077.7214

y = 0.0454x0.5481

R2 = 0.9954

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000

Freight cost/mi, $

Tank volume, gal

Freight cost/mi vs. Tank Volume
Freight 

cost/mi, $

Freight 

cost/500 mi, $

3.5 1750

5 2500

7.5 3750

10 5000

40.5 20250
y = 22.686x0.5481

R2 = 0.9954

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000

Series1

Power (Series1)
EXHIBIT 31.3





CERTIFICATION



I, Frederic W.J. Birner, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Birner Dental
                                                                               Management Services, Inc.; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A does not
                                                                               contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
                                                                               light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
                                                                               Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 28, 2017



|/s/ Frederic W.J. Birner       | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Name: Frederic W.J. Birner     | 
|Title: Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 23.01
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-49293 and Form S-8 No. 33-46702) pertaining to the 1990 Stock Option
Plan of Law Companies  Group,  Inc., the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.
33-48096) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of LawGibb Group, Inc.,
and the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-99114) pertaining to the 401(k)
Savings Plan of Law  Companies  Group,  Inc., of our report dated March 9, 2001,
with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements of LawGibb Group,  Inc.
incorporated  by reference  in the Annual  Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2000.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of LawGibb Group, Inc.
listed in Item 14(a).  This  schedule  is the  responsibility  of the  Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial  statements taken as a whole,  present fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.


                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                          ------------------------
                                          Ernst & Young LLP



Atlanta, Georgia
March 29, 2001
----

----

I Akty, ktorých uverejnenie je povinné

----

NARIADENIE KOMISIE (ES) č. 317/2006

z 22. decembra 2005,

ktorým sa na rok 2005 stanovuje zoznam Prodcom priemyselných výrobkov, ustanovený nariadením Rady (EHS) č. 3924/91

KOMISIA EURÓPSKYCH SPOLOČENSTIEV,

so zreteľom na Zmluvu o založení Európskeho spoločenstva,

so zreteľom na nariadenie Rady (EHS) č. 3924/91 z 19. decembra 1991 o zavedení štatistických zisťovaní týkajúcich sa priemyselnej výroby Spoločenstva (1), a najmä na jeho článok 2 ods. 6,

keďže:

PRIJALA TOTO NARIADENIE:

Článok 1

Zoznam Prodcom na rok 2005 je uvedený v prílohe.

Článok 2

Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť dvadsiatym dňom po jeho uverejnení v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie.

Uplatňuje sa od 1. januára 2005.

Toto nariadenie je záväzné v celom rozsahu a priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch.

V Bruseli 22. decembra 2005.

Za Komisiu

Joaquín ALMUNIA

člen Komisie

----

(1)Ú. v. ES L 374, 31.12.1991, s. 1. Nariadenie zmenené a doplnené nariadením Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 1882/2003 (Ú. v. EÚ L 284, 31.10.2003, s. 1).

(2)Ú. v. ES L 181, 28.6.1989, s. 47.

----

PRÍLOHA

----
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Accounting and Administrative Officer *

Pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Report of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (the Bank) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Christina J. Gehrke, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank.

Date: August 12, 2008



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Christina J. Gehrke                                             
|Christina J. Gehrke                                                 
|Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting and Administrative Officer *



|* | The Chief Accounting and Administrative Officer for purposes of the Seattle Banks disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting performs
similar functions as a principal financial officer.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
kpmg.htm


 



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


 


The Board of Directors


 


Kansas City Life Insurance Company:


 


We consent to the use of our reports dated February 26, 2010 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Kansas City Life Insurance Company (the Company) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, cash flows, and comprehensive income for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009; and to the use of our report dated April 20, 2010 with respect to the statement of net assets of Kansas City Life Variable Annuity Separate Account (comprising individual subaccounts as listed in note 1 to the financial statements) as of December 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the period or year then ended; the statement of changes in net assets for each of the periods or years in the two-year period then ended; and financial highlights for each of the periods or years in the five-year period then ended, which reports appear in the Statement of Additional Information accompanying the Prospectus of Century II Freedom Variable Annuity, included in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to the Registration Statement under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 (File No. 333-98805) on Form N-4 and to the reference to our firm under the heading Experts, also in the Statement of Additional Information.


 


As discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities due to the adoption of new accounting requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), effective January 1, 2009, the Company changed its method of recognizing and measuring the tax effects related to uncertain tax positions due to the adoption of new accounting requirements issued by the FASB, effective January 1, 2007, and the Company changed its method of accounting for deferred acquisition costs on internal replacements of insurance contracts due to adoption of new accounting requirements issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, effective January 1, 2007.


 


 


/s/ KPMG LLP


 


 


Kansas City, Missouri


April 26, 2010
1

Werner, Christopher

From: Werner, Christopher

Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:41 AM

To: 'Szabo, Aaron'

Subject: RE: Example

Thank you Aaron, this is helpful. 

Chris Werner 

US EPA – Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Air Quality Policy Division 

(919) 541-5133 

werner.christopher@epa.gov 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Szabo, Aaron [mailto:Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:26 AM 

To: Werner, Christopher <Werner.Christopher@epa.gov> 

Subject: Example 

Chris, 

Per our discussion, please see page 387 of the following link: 

http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/02/f29/General%20Service%20Lamp%20NOPR_1.pdf
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roy MANDUJANO, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 73-3353.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 15, 1976.

William S. Sessions, U. S. Atty., John Pinckney, III, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

Michael Allen Peters, Houston, Tex. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellee.

Before TUTTLE, COLEMAN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court of the United States having reversed the judgment of this Court, 496 F.2d 1050 (5th Cir. 1974) it now ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the trial court be and the same is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 1768, 48 L.Ed.2d 212.
| **Exhibit 24.3**      |
|-----------------------|
|                  |
| **POWER OF ATTORNEY** |

 

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Lionel Reilly or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf  (i) to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007, and any such amendment thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (ii) to file the Annual Report on Form 10-K, any amendment thereto, and all exhibits and documents required in connection therewith the SEC, and (iii) generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 22nd day of October, 2007.

 

| /s/ Scott A. Shuey, D.V.M. |
|----------------------------|
| Scott A. Shuey             |

 

| STATE OF IOWA   | ) |   |
|-----------------|---|--------|
|            | ) | ss.    |
| COUNTY OF ADAMS | ) |   |

 

On this 22nd day of October, 2007, before me, a Notary public qualified for said County, personally came Scott A. Shuey, known to me to be the identical person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the execution thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.

 

| /s/ Judy K. Antisdel   |
|------------------------|
| Notary Public          |
| My commission expires: |
|                   |

 

| April 13, 2010 |
|----------------|
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rochdale Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Paul Brock, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of September, 2006.



| | PAUL BROCK                                         
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Paul Brock                                         
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer























---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30096 Summary Calendar

TOMAS CHAVEZ MEMBRADO, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus ROBERT A. WALLIS, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service; DAVID A. WING, Officer in charge of Immigration and Naturalization Service, Bradenton Detention Center, Respondents-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-1743

-------------------- September 30, 1999 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Tomas Chavez Membrado, #760.07, appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his application for a writ of habeas corpus, which sought review of the immigration judge’s bond determination and order of deportation. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He argues that the Immigration and Naturalization Service’s continued detention of him is unlawful based upon his incarceration for over sixNo. 99-30096 -2- months pursuant to an immigration deportation order without his being deported or released on bond. Membrado’s claim is not of constitutional magnitude so as to warrant habeas relief. Further, Membrado’s continued detention is not unlawful and does not implicate due process concerns. Gisbert v. United States Attorney General , 988 F.2d 1437, 1447 (5th Cir.), modified , 997 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir. 1993). Finally, Membrado’s “motion to obtain contract,” which this court treats as a motion for the production of documents, is denied.
AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10617-10618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3944]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[Docket No. FD 35595]


Wellsboro & Corning Railroad, LLC--Acquisition and Operation 
Exemption--Wellsboro & Corning Railroad Company

    Wellsboro & Corning Railroad, LLC (WCLLC), a noncarrier, has filed 
a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire from 
Wellsboro & Corning Railroad Company and to operate approximately 35.5 
miles of rail line between milepost 109.90 at Wellsboro, Pa., and 
milepost 74.70 at Erwin, NY, in Tioga County, PA, and Steuben County, 
NY.
    WCLLC states that it intends to interchange traffic with Norfolk 
Southern Railway Company and Canadian Pacific Railway Company.
    The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on or after March 7, 
2012 (30 days after the notice of exemption was filed).
    WCLLC certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result of 
this transaction will not result in its becoming a Class II or Class I 
rail carrier and will not exceed $5 million.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the 
exemption. Petitions to stay must be filed no later than February 29, 
2012 (at least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective).
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to Docket No. 
FD 35595, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each 
pleading must be served on Louis E. Gitomer, 600 Baltimore Ave., Suite 
301, Towson, MD 21204.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at 
www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: February 13, 2012.

[[Page 10618]]

    By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2012-3944 Filed 2-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
#### James Wallace WOLFE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-84-560.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 29, 1987.

*547E. Alvin Schay, Appellate Public Defender, Norman, for appellant.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., Tomilou Gentry Liddell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

PARKS, Judge:

The appellant, James Wallace Wolfe, was charged, tried and convicted in the District Court of Coal County, Case No. CRF-83-60, for the offense of First Degree Murder. The jury assessed punishment at life imprisonment, and judgment and sentence was imposed in accordance with the jury’s verdict.

The facts of this case are relatively uncomplicated. Ninety-one year old Nancy Yoakum had been the victim of an assault by the appellant’s brother. Appellant had threatened Ms. Yoakum in an attempt to force her to dismiss the charges. In the early morning hours of June 12, 1983, appellant went to Ms. Yoakum’s apartment, apparently to again urge her to dismiss charges against his brother. Appellant claimed Ms. Yoakum pulled a pistol, and that he stabbed her twice with a pocket knife, the attack injuring her heart and causing her death. A pistol was found in Ms. Yoakum’s pocket. Appellant had told several persons he would “get” Ms. Yoa-kum if she did not dismiss the charges pending against his brother. After the murder, he told a friend, “I made damn sure she’s dead. She won’t do no more talking.”

I.

In his first two asssignments of error, the appellant asserts that portions of his tape recorded statement were improperly admitted into evidence, inasmuch as the statement was made during plea negotiations with the prosecutor, and was coerced by law enforcement officials. However, we find that appellant failed to properly preserve this error at trial, and it is waived for purposes of appeal.

Title 12 O.S.1981, § 2104(A)(1) requires that objections to the admission of evidence must be both *specific*and *timely,*in order for merits of the objection to be considered on appeal. At trial, counsel objected “for the purposes of appeal,” but stated no rea; son for his objection. Accordingly, we find that any argument regarding admission of the tapes has been waived.

II.

Next, appellant complains that the jury herein did not represent a fair cross-section of society, a right guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Federal Constitution. However, we rejected this precise argument in *Walker v. State,*723 P.2d 273, 282 (Okl.Cr.1986), and we adhere to that holding today.

The judgment and sentence of the District Court is

AFFIRMED.

BRETT, P.J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher Paterson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-QSB of Cantop Ventures, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended
October 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Cantop Ventures, Inc.

Date: December 7, 2007


/s/ Christopher Paterson
--------------------------------------
Christopher Paterson
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
(Principal Financial Officer)
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00140-CR

Michael Gowan

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 89th District Court

of Wichita County (30,832-C)

May 19, 2016

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Anne Gardne r_________

_________ Justice Anne Gardner
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0458 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DONALD COLEN BRYANT,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 30 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 24 2023

07/24/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0458