CHAPTER 4. SCREENING ANALYSIS 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

4.1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................4-1
 

4.2 SCREENED-OUT TECHNOLOGIES..........................................................................4-2
 

4.3 REMAINING TECHNOLOGIES .................................................................................4-2
 

LIST OF TABLES 

Table 4.3.1 Fluorescent Lamp Ballast Design Options ................................................... 4-3
 

4-i 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0016 COMMENT 25
CHAPTER 4. SCREENING ANALYSIS
 

4.1 INTRODUCTION 

This chapter discusses the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) screening 

analysis of the technology options identified for fluorescent lamp ballasts. As discussed 

in chapter 3 of the preliminary technical support document (TSD), DOE consults with 

industry, technical experts, and other interested parties to develop a list of technology 

options for consideration. The purpose of the screening analysis is to determine which 

options to consider further and which to screen out. 

Section 325(o)(2) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) provides 

that any new or revised standard must be designed to achieve the maximum improvement 

in energy efficiency that is determined to be technologically feasible and economically 

justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)) In view of the EPCA requirements appendix A to 

subpart C of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), part 430 (10 CFR part 430), 

Procedures, Interpretations, and Policies for Consideration of New or Revised Energy 

Conservation Standards for Consumer Products (the Process Rule) sets forth procedures 

to guide DOE in its consideration and promulgation of new or revised efficiency 

standards. These procedures elaborate on the statutory criteria provided in 42 U.S.C. 

6295(o) and, in part, eliminate problematic technologies early in the process of 

prescribing or amending an energy efficiency standard. In particular, sections 4(b)(4) and 

5(b) of the Process Rule provide guidance to DOE for determining which design options 

are unsuitable for further consideration: 

1.	 Technological feasibility. DOE will consider technologies incorporated in 

commercial products or in working prototypes to be technologically feasible. 

2.	 Practicability to manufacture, install, and service. If mass production and 

reliable installation and servicing of a technology in commercial products could 

be achieved on the scale necessary to serve the relevant market at the time the 

standard comes into effect, then DOE will consider that technology practicable to 

manufacture, install, and service. 

3.	 Adverse impacts on product utility or product availability. If DOE determines 

a technology would have significant adverse impact on the utility of the product 

to significant subgroups of consumers, or would result in the unavailability of any 

covered product type with performance characteristics (including reliability), 

features, sizes, capacities, and volumes that are substantially the same as products 

generally available in the United States at the time, it will not consider this 

technology further. 

4.	 Adverse impacts on health or safety. If DOE determines that a technology will 

have significant adverse impacts on health or safety, it will not consider this 

technology further. 

4-1 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0016 COMMENT 25
 

Section 4.2 discusses the technology options DOE screened out from further 

consideration. Section 4.3 lists the remaining design options DOE considered in its 

analyses. 

4.2 SCREENED-OUT TECHNOLOGIES 

This section addresses the technologies that DOE screened out, having considered 

the following four factors: (1) technological feasibility; (2) practicability to manufacture, 

install, and service; (3) adverse impacts on product utility to consumers; and (4) adverse 

impacts on health or safety. 

DOE examined all of the technology options presented in the technology 

assessment. Of those options, DOE screened out one: laminated sheets of amorphous 

steel. The following discussion details DOE’s consideration of this option in the context 

of the four screening criteria. 

A ballast’s efficiency can be improved by using higher-quality inductors. The 

transformer affects the efficiency of magnetic and electronic ballasts. For electronic 

ballasts, transformers influence the efficiency of the electromagnetic interference, power 

factor correction, and output stage of the ballast. For magnetic ballasts, the transformer 

influences the efficiency of the output stage and current-limiting portion of the ballast. 

One method of decreasing transformer losses is to create the core of the inductor from 

laminated sheets of amorphous steel, insulated from each other. 

DOE screened out this technology because this method increases the size and 

weight of the ballast and therefore is not “practicable to manufacture, install, and 

service.” Larger inductors may cause problems in installing and servicing ballasts 

because the ballast could be too large to fit in a fixture. DOE also believes this 

technology option could have adverse impacts on consumer utility. Specifically, 

increasing the size and weight of the ballast may limit the places a consumer could use 

the ballast in a building. DOE is unaware of whether this technology option is 

technologically feasible or whether it has adverse impacts on health or safety. 

4.3 REMAINING TECHNOLOGIES 

After screening out laminated sheets of amorphous steel in accordance with the 

policies set forth in 10 CFR Part 430, Subpart C, Appendix A, (4)(a)(4) and 5(b), DOE is 

considering the design options in the following table as viable means for improving 

ballast efficacy. Chapter 3 provides a detailed description of these design options, which 

DOE will consider in the engineering analysis (chapter 5). 

4-2 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0016 COMMENT 25
 

 

Table 4.3.1 Fluorescent Lamp Ballast Design Options 

Technology Option Description 

Magnetic Ballast Use a magnetic ballast design. 

Electronic Ballast Use an electronic ballast design. 

Lamp Diameter Vary the lamp diameter to improve system performance. 

Improved Components 

Transformers 

Use grain-oriented silicon steel or amorphous steel to reduce core 

losses. 

Use litz wire to reduce winding losses. 

Diodes Use diodes with lower losses. 

Capacitors Use capacitors with a lower effective series resistance. 

Transistors Use transistors with low drain-to-source resistance. 

Improved Circuit Design 

Cathode Cutout Remove filament heating after lamp has started. 

Integrated Circuits Substitute discrete components with an integrated circuit. 

Starting Method Use instant start instead of rapid start as a starting method for 

lamp operation. 

4-3 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0016 COMMENT 25