alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**From:** Green, Robert (FAA)

**Sent:** Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:50 AM **To:** Galvin, Jonathan (FAA) **Subject:** Add Notice in Docket No. FAA 2015 1682 for Meetings on RR Proposed Control Program Jon, Please add a notice in Docket No. FAA- 2015 - 1682, Directorate Identifier 2015 - NE - 16 -AD, documenting two teleconferences between the ECO and EASA/Rolls- Royce plc (RR) regarding RR’s proposed plan to manage the legacy US Airways RB211 - 535E4 life - limited parts consumed life corrections. The first teleconference occurre d on April 29 th, 2015. RR presented their proposed plan for correcting the consumed cyclic life for the legacy US Airways RB211 - 535E4 life - limited parts, their draw - down plan for removing engines from service that might already exceed their declared safe cyclic life limits, and the rational justifying the plan. The proposed control program is defined in draft Non - Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB) RB.211 - 72 -AH972, which has been provided to operators, EASA, and the ECO for comment. The following peopl e participated in the April 29 th call: Richard Johnson (Rolls - Royce), Tunde Oyinloye (Rolls - Royce), David Wightman (Rolls - Royce), Tony Martin (Rolls - Royce), Julien Delanoy (EASA), Frederic Chambon (EASA), Thomas Boudreau (FAA), Eugene Triozzi (FAA), Karen Grant (FAA), Anthony Cerra (FAA), Robert Green (FAA), Carlos Fernandes (FAA), Timoleon Mouzakis (FAA), Roger Love (FAA), and Henrique Mendes (FAA). The second teleconference occurred on May 14 th, 2015. RR briefed the ECO on the comments they had receive d on the draft NMSB and their planned changes to the document. The following people participated in the May 14 th call: Richard Johnson (Rolls - Royce), Tunde Oyinloye (Rolls - Royce), David Taylor (Rolls - Royce), David Wightman (Rolls - Royce), Tony Martin (Rol ls - Royce), and Robert Green (FAA). Robert Green Engine Certification Branch, ANE - 142 FAA Engine Certification Office Ph: (781) 238 -7754 We value your feedback. The Aircraft Certification Service (AIR) Stakeholder Feedback Form is available at: http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/avs/stakeholder_feedback/air/field/
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

James Mark Jokel, * From the 266th District Court

of Erath County,

Trial Court No. CR15254.

Vs. No. 11-20-00087-CR * February 17, 2022

The State of Texas, * Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

we reverse the judgment of the trial court, and we remand this cause to the trial 

court for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion.
SCPW-24-0000341

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

________________________________________________________________ LEONARDO CHAVEZ, Petitioner,

vs.
THE HONORABLE PAUL B.K. WONG, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai ʻ i, Respondent Judge.

________________________________________________________________ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 1PC141000360)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald , C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ .) Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus filed on April 30, 2024, and the record, Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, nor a lack of alternative means to seek relief. An extraordinary writ is unwarranted. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawai ʻ i 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023). It is ordered that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, July 8, 2024. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Vladimir P. Devens Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-24-0000341 08-JUL-2024 09:24 AM Dkt. 14 ODDP
Exhibit 32.2

NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30,
2007 (the Report), I, Michael B. Moneymaker, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Michael B. MoneymakerMichael B. MoneymakerExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary


August 2, 2007
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.99 MB)

Tags:DLA Disposition Services, Defense Logisitcs Agency, Sagami, Yokosuka Naval Base 

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                       7,441,717
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,419,108
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (754,700)
<INVENTORY>                                 12,489,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,061,218
<PP&E>                                       2,646,018
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,171,274)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,960,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,250,303
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    29,750,791
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,960,159
<SALES>                                     46,592,758
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,592,758
<CGS>                                       28,053,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,053,845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,542,451
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                52,877
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (196,973)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,208,217)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,610,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,597,617
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,597,617
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.77
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of BEFUT International Co., Ltd. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
The Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  September 16, 2011/s/ Hongbo CaoName: Hongbo CaoPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation
550 California Street, 14th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel. 415-835-9200
Fax: 415-391-2949


GMAC Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.
Series 1999-C3
Annual Statement as to Compliance
For Period of September 1 through December 31, 1999

Pursuant to section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, I attest that:


(i.)      A review of the  activities  of GMAC  Commercial  Mortgage  as Special
          Servicer  during  the  period,  and  of  its  performance  under  this
          Agreement, has been made under my supervision.


(ii.)     To the best of my  knowledge,  based on such review,  GMAC  Commercial
          Mortgage as Special  Servicer,  has fulfilled in all material respects
          its obligations under this Agreement  throughout the period.  However,
          during the period of June 1 through December 31, 1999, GMAC Commercial
          Mortgage as Special  Servicer did not service any  Specially  Serviced
          Mortgaged Loans.



(ii)      GMAC  Commercial  Mortgage as Special  Servicer has received no notice
          regarding qualifications, or challenging the status, of the Trust Fund
          as a REMIC or of the  Grantor  Trust as a  "grantor  trust"  under the
          Grantor  Trust  Provisions  from the Internal  Revenue  Service or any
          other governmental agency or body.


BY:
Michele Heisler
Vice President, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation

Date:
3/8/00
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 134 

To amend the National Trails System Act to clarify Federal authority relating 

to land acquisition from willing sellers for the North Country National 

Scenic Trail. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to clarify Federal 

authority relating to land acquisition from willing sellers 

for the North Country National Scenic Trail. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Country Na5 tional Scenic Trail Willing Seller Act’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 134 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE LAND FROM WILLING 

2 SELLERS FOR THE NORTH COUNTRY NA3 TIONAL SCENIC TRAIL. 

4 Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 

5 U.S.C. 1244(a)(8)) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: ‘‘No land or interest in land outside the exterior 

7 boundaries of any federally administered area may be ac8 quired by the Federal Government for the trail except with 

9 the consent of the owner of the land or interest in land.’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99


         906 CERTIFICATION


The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, that:

         (1) The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
         August 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Company.




Date:  November 27, 2002                   /s/ Steven M. Caspers
     ----------------------------          -------------------------------------
                                          Executive Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 24.3
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


        KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint
Lionel Reilly, or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my
name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL
VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2000, to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 with respect to the registration of the common stock of Professional
Veterinary Products, Ltd., and generally to do and perform all things necessary
to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could
do if personally present.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of
October, 2000.



                                                   /s/ Timothy P. Trayer



STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA                       )
                                            )         ss.
COUNTY OF BERKS                             )


        On this 12th day of October, 2000, before me, a Notary Public qualified
for said County, personally came Timothy P. Trayer, known to me to be the
identical person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the
execution thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.




                                                   /s/ Richard H. Hassler
                                                   Notary Public

                                                   My commission expires:
                                                   June 6, 2002
### The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the rep ort and recomm endationof the Honorable Beverly R. Stites, United State s Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ___________ No. 96-1500

___________ Michael G. Branch, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Gary Grimes, in his official * and individual capacity; * Robert Hammond, Administrator, * Appeal from the United States Individually and in his * District Court for the official capacity; Unknown * Western District of Arkansas Agents of Sebastian County * Detention Center; Alan Marx, * {UNPUBLISHED} Night Supervisor, Individually * and in his official capacity; * David Lane, Acting Supervisor, * Individually and in his * official capacity, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 8, 1996 Filed: November 15, 1996

___________ Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Michael G . Branch appeals from a final judgment of the Distric t Court for the Western District of Arkansas granting defendants judgmen t

1 inthis 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have carefully reviewed the record, including the trial transcript, and

### -2-

we affirm on the basis of the district court's order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B
. A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
From: "Martz, Verle" <vmartz@srmaterials.com>

To: Colleen McKaughan/R9/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: "Lindsay, Brett" <BLindsay@srmaterials.com>, Gregory Nudd/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, "Kuehner, 

Pete" <pkuehner@srmaterials.com>, "Smith, Roger" <rsmith@srmaterials.com>, Thomas 

Webb/R9/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 11/28/2012 10:07 AM 

Subject: EPA Information for Salt River Materials Group_RE: FW: 2012 Phoenix Cement Plant ENERGY 

STAR Certification 

Hi Colleen, 

 

I just wanted to let you know that SRPMIC-PCC is still in the process of reviewing the documents you emailed on November 6. Once our review is complete and at the appropriate time (depending perhaps 

on related proceedings), SRPMIC-PCC will share its comments or furnish questionsregarding the 

information in the documents. 

 

Also, toward developing a response to your November 6 e-mail questions, we are wondering if you 

would let us know: (1) if the questions were asked pursuant to a particular statute or regulation; (2) 

what the EPA intends to do with our answers; and (3) if the EPA is getting ready to propose that the 

Clarkdale facility is a BART-eligible source. 

 

I ask these questions because our preliminary review of the documents you e-mailed seems to indicate 

that the EPA may be getting ready to propose that the Clarkdale facility is a BART-eligible source. This 

would seem contrary to the information in the administrative record, including the WRAP proceedings 

which concluded with a determination that the Clarkdale facility is not BART-eligible. 

 

I look forward to your answers to my questions. They will certainly help us fashion our response to your 

November 6 e-mail questions and our comments or questions on the documents you e-mailed. 

 

Thanks, 

 

Verle Martz 

VP Engineering & Environment 

Salt River Materials Group / 

Phoenix Cement Company and 

Salt River Sand & Rock 

(480) 850-5757 office 

(602) 695-0723 mobile 

vmartz@srmaterials.com
#### STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Johnny A. TURNER, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 860202.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Dec. 30, 1986.

Marlynn Bennett, Price, for defendant and appellant.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Dave B. Thompson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

Memorandum Decision

PER CURIAM:

Defendant was convicted by a jury of forging an $800 check as an advance payment for truck repairs. He now appeals, raising a plethora of issues, all of which are meritless. Without an unnecessary recitation of facts or argument, we affirm his conviction because:

> 1. Having appealed, defendant was not denied his right to appeal.

> 2. The trial testimony, including defendant’s, adequately established the occurrence of the offense, even though the actual day of the month was disputed.

> 3. The offense occurred in Price, Utah. The jury was entitled to take notice that Price is in Carbon County. *State v. Wade,*725 P.2d 1316 (Utah 1986).

> 4. The trial court did not err in allowing disputed testimony to which no objection *494was raised below. *Cf State v. Wardle,*564 P.2d 764 (Utah 1977).

> 5. The State sufficiently established a chain of custody of the check forged by defendant. *State v. Madsen,*28 Utah 2d 108, 498 P.2d 670 (1972).

Finally, defendant’s claim of “ineffective assistance” of counsel at trial must also fail. He does not satisfy his burden to show that he was unfairly prejudiced merely because his attorney did not secure the appearance at trial of a person who was supposedly somewhere in Georgia at the time of trial. *State v. Frame,*723 P.2d 401 (Utah 1986). Even assuming that defendant’s phone bill or other unrevealed documents had been introduced as exhibits and that defendant’s witnesses could have testified as he claimed, we do not find that with any reasonable probability the verdict would have been different. *State v. Frame; State v. Lairby,*699 P.2d 1187, 1204 (Utah 1984). Defendant does not show that his counsel’s representation falls below an objective standard of reasonableness. There was nothing fundamentally unfair or prejudicial in the diligent representation by defendant’s trial counsel.

Affirmed.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1489 

To amend the Small Business Act to create parity among small business 

contracting programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2009 

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to create parity among 

small business contracting programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Con5 tracting Programs Parity Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act— 

8 (1) the terms ‘‘Administration’’ and ‘‘Adminis9 trator’’ mean the Small Business Administration 

10 and the Administrator thereof, respectively; and 


smartinez on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1489 IS

1 (2) the terms ‘‘HUBZone small business con2 cern’’, ‘‘small business concern’’, ‘‘small business 

3 concern owned and controlled by service-disabled 

4 veterans’’, and ‘‘small business concern owned and 

5 controlled by women’’ have the same meanings as in 

6 section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

7 632). 

8 SEC. 3. CONTRACTING IMPROVEMENTS. 

9 (a) CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES.—Section 

10 31(b)(2)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

11 657a(b)(2)(B)) is amended by striking ‘‘shall’’ and insert12 ing ‘‘may’’. 

13 (b) CONTRACTING GOALS.—Section 15(g)(1) of the 

14 Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)) is amended in 

15 the fourth sentence by inserting ‘‘and subcontract’’ after 

16 ‘‘not less than 3 percent of the total value of all prime 

17 contract’’. 

18 (c) MENTOR-PROTEGE PROGRAMS.—The Adminis19 trator may establish mentor-protege programs for small 

20 business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled 

21 veterans, small business concerns owned and controlled by 

22 women, and HUBZone small business concerns modeled 

23 on the mentor-protege program of the Administration for 


smartinez on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1489 IS

1 small business concerns participating in programs under 

2 section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS