alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-50762 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. QUITTMAN ANDRE GOODLEY, also known as Q-Good, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:11-CR-331-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney a ppointed to r epresent Q uittman Andre Goodley has moved for leave to wi t h d raw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and U n ited States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Goodley has filed responses and has moved for a ppointment of new counsel. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well a s G oodley’s responses. The record is insufficiently U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Nov em ber 19, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-50762 Document: 00512445839 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/19/2013No. 12-50762

developed to a llow consideration at this time of Goodle y ’ s claim of ineffective assistance of c ounsel; such a claim generally “cannot be r esolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before t he d istrict court since no opportunity existed to develop the r ecord on the merits of the allegations.” United S tates v. Cantwell , 470 F .3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotat i o n m a rks and citation omitted). Further, we c oncur with counsel’s assessment t hat the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for a ppellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s m otion for leave to withdraw is G RANTED, counsel is excused f rom f u r t her responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 4 2.2. The motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

2 Case: 12-50762 Document: 00512445839 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/19/2013
SIGNATURES

    Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.


                        AMERICAN NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.


Date: 10/28/96              By: /s/ A. Bruce Tucker
                                A. Bruce Tucker, President
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                and Director


    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.



By: /s/ A. Bruce Tucker           By: /s/ James M. Uveges
    A. Bruce Tucker, President,      James M. Uveges, Senior Vice
     Chief Executive                  President and Chief
     and Director                     Financial Officer 
    (principal accounting officer)

Date: 10/28/96                    Date: 10/28/96



By: /s/ Howard K. Thompson        By: /s/ Lenwood M. Ivey
    Howard K. Thompson, Chairman     Lenwood M. Ivey, Director
     of the Board           

Date: 10/28/96                    Date: 10/28/96



By: /s/ David L. Pippinger        By: /s/ Joseph M. Solomon
    David L. Pippinger, Director      Joseph M. Solomon, Director

Date: 10/28/96                    Date: 10/28/96



By: /s/ Betty J. Stull            By: /s/ Jimmie T. Noble
    Betty J. Stull, Director         Jimmie T. Noble, Director

Date: 10/28/96                   Date: 10/28/96

PAGE
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10(c)


CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 



We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 20 to the BlackRock Fundamental Growth
Principal Protected Fund of BlackRock Principal Protected Trust’s Registration Statement
on Form N-1A of our report dated March 14, 2006 except as to the effects of
reclassifications of balances for reportable segments as reflected in Note 20 for which
the date is May 25, 2006, relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in Bank of America
Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 25, 2006. 



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 



Charlotte, North Carolina
December
28, 2006
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Donald J. Stephens, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 ofWauwatosa Holdings, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
-44-

 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: October 31, 2006   /s/ Donald J. Stephens     Donald J. Stephens  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer  
-45-
### Served: October 25 , 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 25 th of October, 2012

Essential Air Service at

El CENTRO, CALIFORNIA

Under 49 U. S.C. 41731 et seq

. DOCKET DOT

- OST

- 200 8

- 0 299

NOTICE OF EXTENSION FOR COMMENTS AT EL CENTRO, CALIFORNIA

By Order 2010

- 12

- 6 the Department selected SkyWest Airlines, Inc., d/b /a United Express

, to provide Essential Air Service (EAS) at El Centro

, California , for $ 1,852,091 annual subsidy. The

r ate is set to expire on December 31 , 2012. With the end of the contract approaching, by Order 201 2

- 8

- 18
, August 17 , 2012 , we requested proposals by September 18 , 2012

. On September 17 , 2012, Seaport Airlin es, Inc., requested a two

- week extension to submit proposals
at El Centro

. We received proposals on October 2 from SkyWest, Seaport, and Sovereign Air, and on October 9 requested comments by November 6, 2012. On October 24, 2012, the El Centro Chamber of Commerce requested an extension to November 14, 2012.

We will grant the extension request. Comments regarding the carrier

- selection decision at El Centro , California, are now due on November 14 , 2012.

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.regulations.gov
#### Kenneth S. KELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-84-811.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 26, 1987.

*567Patti Palmer, Public Defender, Norman, for appellant.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., Terry J. Jenks, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

BUSSEY, Judge:

The appellant, Kenneth S. Kelly, was tried and convicted in the District Court of Logan County of the crimes of Assault and Battery With a Deadly Weapon, Resisting an Officer, and Larceny of Merchandise From a Retailer in Case Nos. CRF-83-127, CRF-83-626, and CRF-83-627 and was sentenced to ten (10) .years, one (1) year, and twenty (20) days imprisonment, respectively, and he appeals.

In his third assignment of error, appellant contends that the trial court failed to follow Oklahoma law regarding the determination of competency. We agree.

This Court recently held in *Scott v. State,*730 P.2d 7 (Okl.Cr.1986) that:

> Under the new system, a defendant may make an application to the trial court for a determination of competency to stand trial. Title 22 O.S.1981, § 1175.2(A). When an application is made, the trial court must hold an *initial*hearing to determine whether there is any doubt as to the defendant’s competency. Title 22 O.S.1981, § 1175.3(B). If, after holding the initial hearing, the trial court finds that ‘there is no doubt as to the competency of the person, it shall order the criminal proceedings to resume.’ Title 22 O.S.1981, § 1175.3(C). If, on the other hand, the trial court determines that a doubt exists, it must order a competency examination. Title 22 O.S.1981, § 1175.-3(D). The defendant is then examined by an appropriate expert and the expert must answer a number of specific questions relating to the defendant’s competency. Title 22 O.S.1981, § 1175.3(E). Once the examination has been completed, the statutory system directs that a second ‘hearing on the competency of the person *shall*be held.’ Title 22 O.S.1981, § 1175.4(A) (emphasis added).

In the instant case the trial court held an initial hearing and found that there was a doubt as to appellant’s sanity, and appellant was examined by experts. However, appellant was never afforded a post-examination hearing as required by 22 O.S.1981, § 1175.4(A).

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial consistent with this opinion.

BRETT, P.J., and PARKS, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,706
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,866
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     25,810
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,362
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,388
<LOANS>                                        100,717
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,089
<DEPOSITS>                                      99,339
<SHORT-TERM>                                    20,162
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,027
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,843
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,718
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 140,089
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,835
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,283
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    82
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,200
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,056
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,112
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,088
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       33
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,853
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,853
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,200
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.09
<LOANS-NON>                                        973
<LOANS-PAST>                                       973
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    973
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   951
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       17
<RECOVERIES>                                        87
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,054
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,054
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Renaissance Bioenergy Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Scott
Pummill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 13th day of January 2010.





SCOTT PUMMILLScott PummillChief Executive Officer
Certification Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Casey Forward, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A, of Globetech Ventures Corp.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: October 17, 2005



Casey Forward



Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of TechPrecision Corporation (Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, James S. Molinaro, the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Richard F. Fitzgerald, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: February 14, 2011
/s/  James S. MolinaroJames S. MolinaroChief Executive OfficerDated: February 14, 2011
/s/  Richard F. FitzgeraldRichard F. FitzgeraldChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greenville Federal Financial
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David M. Kepler, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ David M. Kepler
-------------------------------------
David M. Kepler
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 11, 2006
Exhibit
      10.2


LINE
      OF
      CREDIT PROMISSORY NOTE





$50,0000
      Date: July 3, 2006





FOR
      VALUE
      RECEIVED, Frezer, Inc. , ("Borrower") a Nevada corporation whose address is
      promises to pay to the order of Bio Technology Partners Business Trust
      ("Lender"), a Pennsylvania Business Trust, the principal sum of Fifty Thousand
      Dollars ($50,000), or so much thereof as may be disbursed to, or for the benefit
      of the Borrower by Lender in Lender's sole and absolute discretion. It is the
      intent of the Borrower and Lender hereunder to create a line of credit agreement
      between Borrower and Lender whereby Borrower may borrow up to $50,000 from
      Lender; provided, however, that Lender has no obligation to lend Borrower any
      amounts hereunder and the decision to lend such money lies in the sole and
      complete discretion of the Lender.





INTEREST
      & PRINCIPAL: The unpaid principal of this line of credit shall bear simple
      interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum. Interest on any advance
      shall be calculated based on the principal balance of that individual advance.
      Interest on the unpaid balance of any advance shall accrue monthly but shall
      not
      be due and payable until such time as when the principal balance of the advance
      becomes due and payable. The principal balance of this Note in regards to any
      advance made shall be due and payable on the date that is 365 days from the
      date
      of that advance . There shall be no penalty for early repayment of all or any
      part of the principal of any advance.





DEFAULT:
      The Borrower shall be in default of this Note on the occurrence of any of the
      following events: (i) the Borrower shall fail to meet its obligation to make
      the
      required principal or interest payments hereunder.


(ii)
      the
      Borrower shall be dissolved or liquidated;


(iii)
      the
      Borrower shall make an assignment for the benefit of creditors or shall be
      unable to, or shall admit in writing their inability to pay their debts as
      they
      become due;


(iv)
      the
      Borrower shall commence any case, proceeding, or other action under any existing
      or future law of any jurisdiction relating to bankruptcy, insolvency,
      reorganization or relief of debtors, or any such action shall be commenced
      against the undersigned;


(v)
      the
      Borrower shall suffer a receiver to be appointed for it or for any of its
      property or shall suffer a garnishment, attachment, levy or execution.





REMEDIES:
      Upon default of this Note, Lender may declare the entire amount due and owing
      hereunder to be immediately due and payable. Lender may also use all remedies
      in
      law and in equity to enforce and collect the amount owed under this
      Note.





Borrower
      hereby waives demand, presentment, notice of dishonor, diligence in collecting,
      grace and notice of protest.





BORROWER:





By:
      Frezer
      Inc.


/s/
      David R. Koos


Chairman
      & CEO