alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |

|         |                                                                                                                                                         |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                                        |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                        |
|                                                                   |
| Dated: August 6, 2019                                             |
|                                                                   |
| /s/ Thomas M. Hennigan                                                 |
| Thomas M. HenniganChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| * | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. |
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Probe Manufacturing, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:  (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  May 21, 2010By: /s/ Kambiz MahdiChief Executive OfficerDateKambiz Mahdi  The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information language in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4957]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds--Name Change: White 
Mountains Reinsurance Company of America

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. ID to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2011 Revision, published July 1, 2011, at 76 FR 38892.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that White Mountains 
Reinsurance Company of America (NAIC<greek-i>38776) has changed its 
name to Sirius America Insurance Company effective September 10, 2011. 
Federal bond-approving officials should annotate their reference copies 
of the Treasury Department Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2011 Revision, 
to reflect this change.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

     Dated: February 21, 2012.
Laura Carrico,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-4957 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-30689

Summary Calendar

FELIX A. PRICE,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:17-CV-4052

Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Felix A. Price, Louisiana prisoner # 91688, appeals from the denial of his 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. The magistrate judge denied 

Price’s Rule 60(b) motion. After Price filed a notice of appeal, the district court 

affirmed the magistrate judge’s denial.

 The magistrate judge lacked authorization to rule on Price’s Rule 60(b) 

motion under these circumstances because Price did not consent under 28 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 29, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-30689 Document: 00514620983 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2018
No. 17-30689

2

U.S.C. § 636(c) and there was no other basis for the magistrate judge’s 

authority over that motion. See McLeod, Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. 

Quarles, 925 F.2d 853, 856 (5th Cir. 1991); Parks By and Through Parks v. 

Collins, 761 F.2d 1101, 1104 (5th Cir. 1985). Because the magistrate judge’s 

order was not a final appealable decision, we lack jurisdiction to review it. See 

28 U.S.C. § 1291; Trufant v. Autocon, Inc. 729 F.2d 308, 309 (5th Cir. 1984). 

Moreover, Price’s premature notice of appeal was insufficient to confer 

jurisdiction on this court from the district court’s order affirming the 

magistrate judge’s denial. See FirsTier Mortg. Co. v. Investors Mortg. Ins. Co., 

498 U.S. 269, 276-77 (1991); see also United States v. Cooper, 135 F.3d 960, 963 

(5th Cir. 1998).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 Case: 17-30689 Document: 00514620983 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2018
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1557 

To reinstate the Interim Management Strategy governing off-road vehicle 

use in the Cape Hatteras National Seashore, North Carolina, pending 

the issuance of a final rule for off-road vehicle use by the National 

Park Service. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2009 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reinstate the Interim Management Strategy governing 

off-road vehicle use in the Cape Hatteras National Seashore, North Carolina, pending the issuance of a final 

rule for off-road vehicle use by the National Park Service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving Public Ac5 cess to Cape Hatteras Beaches Act of 2009’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1557 IS

1 SEC. 2. CAPE HATTERAS NATIONAL SEASHORE, NORTH 

2 CAROLINA. 

3 (a) REINSTATEMENT OF INTERIM MANAGEMENT

4 STRATEGY.—During the period beginning on the date of 

5 enactment of this Act and ending on the date on which 

6 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director 

7 of the National Park Service, issues a special regulation 

8 and long-term off-road vehicle management plan for the 

9 use of Cape Hatteras National Seashore, North Carolina 

10 (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Seashore’’), the Sea11 shore shall be managed in accordance with the Interim 

12 Protected Species Management Strategy/Environmental 

13 Assessment issued by the National Park Service on June 

14 13, 2007. 

15 (b) INAPPLICABILITY OF CONSENT DECREE.—The 

16 consent decree dated April 30, 2008, and filed in the 

17 United States District Court for the Eastern District of 

18 North Carolina regarding off-road vehicle use at the Sea19 shore shall not apply after the date of enactment of this 

20 Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF
                             WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                             % of Securities
                                                                                                Owned by
Name                                                             Incorporated                 Immed. Parent
----                                                             ------------                ---------------
<S>                                                           <C>                            <C>
WestPoint Stevens Inc. I                                      Delaware                            100%
     J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc.                                 Delaware                            100%
          WestPoint Stevens (Canada) Ltd.                     Canada                              100%
          J.P. Stevens Enterprises, Inc.                      Delaware                            100%
     Alamac Holdings Inc.                                     Delaware                            100%
     Liebhardt Inc.                                           Delaware                            100%
WestPoint Stevens (Asia) Inc.                                 British Virgin Islands              100%
WestPoint Stevens Stores Inc.                                 Georgia                             100%
WestPoint Stevens (UK) Limited                                England                             100%
    WestPoint Stevens (Europe) Limited                        England                             100%
          Lexward Properties Limited                          England                             100%
          P.J. Flower Inc.                                    New Jersey                          100%
          DPC Associates Limited                              England & Wales                     100%
WPS Receivables Corporation                                   Delaware                            100%
WPSI Inc.                                                     Delaware                            100%
</TABLE>


                                       48
<PAGE>
  
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1




           PEPSI-COLA PUERTO RICO BOTTLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
           --------------------------------------------------------

                Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings
                                  (Unaudited)
             (U.S. Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                            Three Months
                                                Ended                      Fiscal Years Ended September 30 
                                             December 31,                  ------------------------------
                                                1998                1998                1997               1996 
                                              --------           ---------          -----------          ---------
<S>                                          <C>                 <C>                <C>                  <C> 
Net loss                                      $ (1,420)          $ (9,610)          $  (19,503)          $(74,330)
                                              ========           ========           ==========           ========

Net loss - assuming dilution                  $ (1,420)          $ (9,610)          $  (19,503)          $(74,330)
                                              ========           ========           ==========           ========

Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding                         21,690             21,516               21,500             21,500

Shares assumed to be issued upon
     exercise of stock options                     *                  *                    *                  *

Shares assumed to be issued upon
     exercise of stock warrant                     *                  *                    *                  *

Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding - assuming
     dilution                                   21,690             21,516               21,500             21,500
                                              ========           ========           ==========           ========

Net loss per common share                     $  (0.07)          $  (0.45)          $    (0.91)          $  (3.46)
                                              ========           ========           ==========           ========

Net loss per common share - assuming
     dilution                                 $  (0.07)          $  (0.45)          $    (0.91)          $  (3.46)
                                              ========           ========           ==========           ========
</TABLE> 

Note: if an item appears with a *, the security was antidilutive for the period
presented.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MIGUEL REMEDIO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 307 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of December, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 31.3



CERTIFICATION



I, Allen E. Larson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter (fourth fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting; and



5. the Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to our auditors and to the audit committee of our Board of Directors:



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect our ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:
        11-27-07
        
        
        /s/  Allen E. LarsonController and Chief Accounting Officer






---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-41373

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDNA MARTINEZ SIERRA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:00-CR-26-ALL

--------------------

July 2, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edna Martinez Sierra appeals her jury conviction and

sentence for income tax fraud pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 287, 18

U.S.C. § 1001, and 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1)&(2). She argues that the

evidence was insufficient to find her guilty beyond a reasonable

doubt; that the district court erred in not holding a hearing to

determine whether extrinsic evidence tainted the jury’s verdict;

and that the district court erred in calculating the amount of

monetary loss to the government pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1. 

The standard of review in assessing Sierra's

sufficiency-of-evidence challenge is "whether, considering all
No. 00-41373

-2-

the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, a

reasonable trier of fact could have found that the evidence

established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt." United States v.

Mendoza, 226 F.3d 340, 343 (5th Cir. 2000). We hold that the

evidence was sufficient for the jury to find Sierra guilty beyond

a reasonable doubt on all counts charged in the indictment.

The district court's decision whether to hold an evidentiary

hearing to investigate allegations of juror misconduct is

reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Jobe, 101

F.3d 1046, 1057-58 (5th Cir. 1996). We hold that Sierra has not

made a “colorable showing of extrinsic influence” and therefore

has not demonstrated that the district court abused its

discretion in determining that an evidentiary hearing was

unnecessary. See id.

This court reviews a district court's loss determination

pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1 for clear error. United States v.

Oates, 122 F.3d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1997). We further hold that

the district court did not clearly err in its calculation of the

total monetary loss attributable to Sierra’s criminal conduct. 

We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
Exhibit
      31.2




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Mary
      Desmond, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December
      31,
      2006, of Techprecision Corporation;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible
      for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
      in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
      have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have
      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
      financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
      registrant’s board of directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




****Dated:
              February 14, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Mary
              DesmondMary
              DesmondChief
                Financial Officer