alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Adams, Kevin (OST)
From: Sent: To: Subject:
Sirs, Timothy Gaffney <timothygaffney@gmail.com> Monday, June 17, 2013 2:52 PM Adams, Kevin (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST) PHMU Waimea-Kohala, Hawaii EAS

For a few decades I have been involved with Waimea-KohalaAirport. I have seen EAS bid winning outfits come and go, and one unfortunately not deliver on EAS whenthe bid was zero. My vote is for Schuman Aviation. They are local, and believe me after making a study ofthe State ofHawaii (since the late 70's) it matters. Mokulele has putin writing an ambitious schedule for multiple trips to Maui and separate multiple trips to Honolulu almost every day ofthe week, should they receive the EAS. I don't foresee this ambitious schedule continuing withour demographic. This is a bit ofaploy to entice the communitythat does notrealize that unprofitable trips will be trimmed down to something like what Mr. Schuman is proposing. That schedule is one trip betweenHonolulu and Waimea-Kohala in the morning and one trip inthe late afternoon/evening. Konato Maul and return is very readily available viathe Kona International Airport (40-50 minute drive from Waimea_Kohala). Withthe very limited amount ofpassenger traffic to Maui ±rom Waimea-Kohala, Mokulele would soon drop the Waimea-Kohala/Maui trip from their schedule ifthey were to receive the EAS. I realize Mokulele is larger withmore aircraft and seems betterpoised to enterthis market with fewer logistical challenges. Butknowing Mr. Schuman and watching his operation and modus operandi for many years, and as a resident ofWaimea-Kohala I feel he would rise to the challenges ofthis service, add addtional aircraft andbe as good as any inthe shmiterm and more importantlybe here with community minded service in the long run. Something we have been lacking for many years. Thanks for your consideration. Feel free to contact me at (808) 987-9922 -IOGMT should you like to have additional information. Sincerely, Timothy Gaffney

1
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-25,679-49
IN RE ARTHUR DAV ID LOWE, Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 507052 IN THE 183RD DIST RICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ o f m an damus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he wrote to the Har ris County Distr i ct C lerk reque sting an estimate of the cost to pur chase copies of r equeste d rec ords, but r ece ived a response citing to Section 552.028 of the Texas Gover nment Code, stating that the Clerk’s Offic e did not have to acc ept or comply with a reque st from a person imprisoned or confine d in a corr ectional fac ility
. In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Har ris County , is order ed to file a response stating whether he rec eived a reque st from t h e R el at o r for a statement of costs for his rec ords. I f the District Clerk rec eived such a reque st, he shall state the2

nature of his response and, if available , provide a copy of the response . I f the District Clerk rec eived such a reque st and did not respond, he shall provide his rationale for not responding
. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitt ed the appropriate re sponse. Such re sponse shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.
Filed: August 11, 2021 Do not publish
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 11, 2021 No. 04-21-00273-CR The STATE of Texas, Appellant
v. Marco Antonio GLORIA , Appellee From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-02-07982-MCRAJA Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On August 10, 2021, appellee filed a Motion to Substitute Appellate Counsel. After consideration, appellee’s motion is GRANTED . We ORDER the clerk of this court to update the records of this case to show Clay Dean Thomas as attorney of record for appellee.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of August, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
# bAY ..EADJNç

(7-) Julyl3,2011 The Honorable Ray LaHood The Honorable Lisa Jackson Secretary Administrator Department of Transportation Environmental Protection Agency 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20590 Washington, DC 20004
Dear Secretary LaHood and Administrator Jackson: Union Pacific Railroad provides a variety of transportation services and products for the automotive industry. These offerings predominantly include the transport of finished vehicles to end markets as well as the movement of auto parts to support production. Given that your agencies are now developing national fuel economy standards for 2017-2025, we wanted to share our views. We are concerned that the Administration is going down a regulatory path on fuel economy that will result in job losses and other harmful costs to the economy. We encourage NHTSA and EPA to adopt a single, national fuel economy standard that considers America's needs for increased fuel economy while preserving affordable choices for customers and businesses to meet their transportation needs. NHTSA and EPA have already set strong standards for 2012-2016 that raised the fleet average by 40% to 35 miles per gallon. Looking forward, technology improvements should continue to support increases in fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards. However, we are concerned that overreaching regulations can place a significant cost burden on individuals, families, and businesses such as ours. The next phase of fuel economy standards for 2017-2025 should not pick winners and losers, but should support a variety of technologies and fuel diversity to preserve affordability. If fuel economy standards increase too quickly, resulting in more expensive vehicles, many consumers can be expected to hold on to their older vehicles longer and defer buying a new car, which could put jobs across the country at risk. The cost of overreaching is the loss of business and profitability. We encourage you to carefully balance these factors as you weigh sensible fuel economy standards, especially as our nation's economy continues to recover.

Linda A. Brandl Vice President & General Manager - Automotive Union Pacific RailroadU

(M

UNP F° '-

. Qg_D '•-"i

I\ j G NJ -U U C

# 0!

01 0 •c N) 

### o F') 00 0- ui
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  |  | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          |  |                                                       
|------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 26, 2005 |  | /s/ Roger M. Laverty                                  
|                          |  | Roger M. Laverty President and Chief Executive
Officer



Note: A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and will be retained by Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1575 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1575

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure that excess oil and 
   gas lease revenues are distributed in accordance with the Mineral 
                  Leasing Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 2009

   Mr. Udall of Colorado (for himself and Mr. Bennet) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure that excess oil and 
   gas lease revenues are distributed in accordance with the Mineral 
                  Leasing Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF OIL SHALE RESERVE RECEIPTS.

    Section 7439(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(3)(A) The moneys deposited in the Treasury under paragraph (1) 
that exceed the amounts described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 
paragraph (2) shall be transferred by the Secretary of the Treasury in 
accordance with section 35 of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 191) 
to the State of Colorado for use in accordance with subparagraph (B).
    ``(B) Amounts transferred to the State of Colorado under 
subparagraph (A) shall be used by the State and political subdivisions 
of the State for--
            ``(i) conservation, restoration, and protection of land, 
        water, and wildlife resources affected by oil or gas 
        development activities in Garfield and Rio Blanco Counties in 
        the State;
            ``(ii) repair, maintenance, and construction of State and 
        county roads in each of those counties; and
            ``(iii) the conduct of capital improvement projects 
        (including the construction and maintenance of sewer and water 
        treatment plants) that are designed and carried out to address 
        the impacts of oil and gas development activities in each of 
        those counties.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification  Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss.1350)

I,  Thomas W.  Martin,  Chief  Operating  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer
(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp., the General
Partner of the Registrant in connection with the Annual Report of ICON Cash Flow
Partners L.P. Seven (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31,  2005,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof  (the  "Annual  Report")   certify,   pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Annual Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78m); and

2.   The  information  contained in the Annual  Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.


Dated: April 18, 2006

/s/ Thomas W. Martin
-------------------------
Thomas W. Martin
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
ICON Capital Corp.
General Partner of ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P. Seven
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 14186-000; Project No. 14197-000]

On February 22, 2012, the Commission held a drawing to determine priority among competing preliminary permit applications with identical filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that none of the applicants' plans are better adapted than the others to develop, conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the region at issue, the priority established by this drawing will serve as the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order of priority is as follows:

1. Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XXXV, Project No. 14186-000.

2. FFP Project 57, LLC, Project No. 14197-000.

Dated: February 22, 2012.

 Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-4790 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

            We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in the  Registration
Statements  (Nos.  333-06705,  333-30042  and  333-89096) on Form S-8 and in the
Registration Statement (No. 333-99201) on Form S-3 of our report dated September
9, 2002,  except for Notes 5 and 6, as to which the date is September  27, 2002,
for the years ended June 30,  2000,  2001 and 2002,  and to the  addition of our
firm under the caption "Experts" in the Prospectus, insofar as it relates to our
report on the financial statements for the three years ended June 30, 2002.

                                           /s/ Margolin Winer & Evens LLP
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Margolin, Winer & Evens LLP

Garden City, New York
September 30, 2002
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from balance
sheets and statement of operation for the period of December 31, 1999 (audited)
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         294,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,665,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,665,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          290,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    23,794,634
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,734,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               280,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  280,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (647,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (647,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (647,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (140)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (140)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                      WILLIAMS HOLDINGS OF DELAWARE, INC.
 
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                  ------------------------------------------------
                                                   1995       1994       1993      1992      1991
                                                  ------     ------     ------     -----     -----
<S>                                               <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>
Earnings:
  Income from continuing operations before
     income taxes...............................  $268.7     $179.1     $244.9     $53.1     $23.8
  Add:
     Interest expense -- net....................    31.1       21.1        9.4      17.4      26.1
     Rental expense representative of interest
       factor...................................    13.1        4.9        3.4       3.6       3.8
     Preferred dividends of subsidiaries........     5.4         --         --        --        --
     Minority interest income...................     (.2)        --         --        --        --
     Other......................................      .8         .8       (1.0)     (5.7)      (.1)
                                                  ------     ------     ------     -----     -----
Total earnings as adjusted plus fixed charges...  $318.9     $205.9     $256.7     $68.4     $53.6
                                                  ======     ======     ======     =====     =====
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense -- net.......................  $ 31.1     $ 21.1     $  9.4     $17.4     $26.1
  Capitalized interest..........................     9.8        4.7        5.4       2.9       3.5
  Rental expense representative of interest
     factor.....................................    13.1        4.9        3.4       3.6       3.8
  Pretax effect of dividends on preferred stock
     of subsidiaries............................     7.7         --         --        --        --
                                                  ------     ------     ------     -----     -----
          Total fixed charges...................  $ 61.7     $ 30.7     $ 18.2     $23.9     $33.4
                                                  ======     ======     ======     =====     =====
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..............    5.17       6.71      14.10      2.86      1.60
                                                  ======     ======     ======     =====     =====
</TABLE>
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-442

Lower Tribunal No. 20-DR-000220

_____________________________

ADAM T. ST. GEORGE,

Appellant, 

v.

TRACEY B. ST. GEORGE,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County.

Elisabeth Adams, Judge.

March 5, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOZNIAK, MIZE and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Dustin Michael Butler, of Martin Law Firm, P.L., Cape Coral, for Appellant.

George A. Vaka of Vaka Law Group, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

       We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
       Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-10317) pertaining to the 1995 Incentive
       Plan and Non-Employee Directors' Incentive Plan of Patriot American
       Hospitality, Inc. (the "Company") and in the Registration Statement on
       Form S-3 (No. 333-12973) of the Company and the related Prospectus of our
       reports (a) dated January 31, 1997 (except for Note 14, as to which the
       date is March 18, 1997) with respect to the Consolidated Financial
       Statements and financial statement schedules of Patriot American
       Hospitality, Inc. and (b) dated February 16, 1996, with respect to the
       Combined Financial Statements of the Initial Hotels (which is based in
       part on the reports of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., independent accountants,
       as set forth in their reports on Certain of the Initial Hotels and Troy
       Hotel Investors); both included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
       the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP


       Dallas, Texas
       March 20, 1997
Exhibit
10.28


 


FIRST
AMENDMENT TO


GUIDANCE
SOFTWARE, INC.

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO
GUIDANCE SOFTWARE, INC. SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
(this “First Amendment”), made as of April 22, 2009,  is made and adopted by Guidance Software, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the
respective meanings ascribed to them in the Plan (as defined below).


 


WHEREAS, the Company
maintains the Guidance Software, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2004
Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”);


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16
of the Plan, the Plan may be amended from time to time by the Company’s Board
of Directors; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company
desires to amend the Plan as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Plan be amended as follows:


 


1.                                       The last sentence of Section 13(e)(ii) of
the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


“Each Annual Restricted Stock award shall vest
in full with respect to 100% of the Shares subject thereto upon the earlier to
occur of (A) the first anniversary of the date on which such Annual
Restricted Stock award was granted, and (B) the date of the Company’s annual
meeting of stockholders immediately following the Company’s annual meeting of
stockholders at which such Annual Restricted Stock award was granted, in each
case subject to the Independent Director’s continued status as a Service
Provider through such date.”


 


2.                                       This First Amendment shall be and is
hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan.


 


3.                                       All other terms and provisions of the
Plan shall remain unchanged except as specifically modified herein.


 

















 


I hereby certify that the
foregoing First Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of
Guidance Software, Inc. as of April 22, 2010.


 


Executed on this
           day of
                  ,
2010.


 


	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Secretary

  



 


2