Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 29, 2012 / Notices 12235 

long enough during the growing season to 

develop anaerobic conditions in the upper 

part. This definition includes soils that 

developed under anaerobic conditions in the 

upper part but no longer experience these 

conditions due to hydrologic alteration such 

as those hydric soils that have been 

artificially drained or protected (e.g., ditches 

or levees) (http://soils.usda.gov/use/hydric/ 

intro.html). 

Long duration means a duration class in 

which inundation for a single event ranges 

from 7 days to 1 month. 

Map unit means a collection of areas 

defined and named the same in terms of their 

soil components or miscellaneous areas or 

both. 

Map unit components means the collection 

of soils and miscellaneous areas found 

within a map unit. 

Phase, map unit means a subdivision of a 

map unit based on features that affect its use 

and management (e.g., slope, surface texture, 

stoniness, and thickness). 

Ponded means a condition in which water 

stands in a closed depression. The water is 

removed only by percolation, evaporation, or 

transpiration. 

Very long duration means a duration class 

in which innundation for a single event is 

greater than 1 month. 

What’s included on the hydric soils 

lists? 

National List 

‘‘Hydric Soils of the United States’’ is 

a compilation of all map units with 

either a major or minor component that 

is at least in part hydric. This could 

include components that are soil series, 

components that are classified at 

categories higher than the series level in 

Soil Taxonomy, and miscellaneous land 

types. Because the list includes both 

major and minor (small) percentages for 

map units, in some cases most of the 

map unit may not be hydric. Also, some 

components may be phases of soil series 

that have a range of characteristics that 

both meet and do not meet hydric 

indicator requirements; therefore, only a 

portion of that component’s concept (or 

range in characteristics) may in fact be 

hydric. The list is useful in identifying 

map units that may contain hydric soils. 

The national list is generated once per 

calendar year (usually in January or 

February) to satisfy legislated mandates. 

The NRCS Hydric Soils Lists, 

available at ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/ 

NSSC/Hydric_Soils/Lists/ 

hydric_soils.xlsx, are by soil map unit 

component. Detailed and up-to-date 

hydric soil lists (e.g., by soil survey area 

map unit component) are maintained by 

the NRCS State offices and local field 

offices and can be downloaded from the 

Soil Data Mart at: http:// 

soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/. 

State Lists 

The State lists are subsets of the 

national hydric soils list by State. For 

more detailed State lists by map unit, 

contact the appropriate NRCS State 

office. 

Local Lists 

NRCS has developed local lists of 

map units that contain hydric soils for 

each county, parish, or soil survey area 

in the United States. These local lists 

are available at the NRCS State offices, 

local NRCS field office, and on the Soil 

Data Mart at: http:// 

soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/ and are the 

preferred lists for use in making 

preliminary wetland determinations. 

Information from the Soil Data Mart is 

the most up-to-date information as well 

as the official soil survey information. 

Since the national list is only compiled 

once a year and Soil Data Mart may be 

updated on a more frequent basis, the 

Soil Data Mart should be deferred to 

when there is a discrepancy. 

Signed this 22nd day of February, 2012, in 

Washington, DC. 

Dave White, 

Chief, Natural Resources Conservation 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2012–4733 Filed 2–28–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–16–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Economic Development Administration 

Meeting of the National Advisory 

Council on Innovation and 

Entrepreneurship 

AGENCY: Economic Development 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of an open meeting. 

SUMMARY: The National Advisory 

Council on Innovation and 

Entrepreneurship will hold a meeting 

on Tuesday, March 13, 2012. The open 

meeting will be conducted from 10 

a.m.–1 p.m. and will be open to the 

public. The meeting will take place at 

Gallier Hall, 545 St. Charles Avenue, 

New Orleans, LA 70130. The Council 

was chartered on November 10, 2009 to 

advise the Secretary of Commerce on 

matters relating to innovation and 

entrepreneurship in the United States. 

DATES: March 13, 2012. 

Time: 10 a.m.–1 p.m. (CST). 

ADDRESSES: Gallier Hall, 545 St. Charles 

Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70130. Please 

specify any special requests for 

participation five business days in 

advance. Last minute requests will be 

accepted, but may be impossible to 

complete. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

purpose of this meeting is to discuss the 

implementation of the components of 

the University President’s letter 

organized by the National Advisory 

Council on Innovation and 

Entrepreneurship, discuss further policy 

implications of this letter and its efforts, 

and to hear from entrepreneurs in New 

Orleans. Specific topics for discussion 

include student entrepreneurship, highgrowth entrepreneurship, technology 

transfer, and the opportunities and 

challenges for entrepreneurs in New 

Orleans, and how the United States 

government can support them. The final 

agenda will be posted on the U.S. 

Department of Commerce Web site at 

www.commerce.gov. Any member of the 

public may submit pertinent written 

comments concerning the Council’s 

affairs at any time before or after the 

meeting. Comments may be submitted 

to Nish Acharya at the contact 

information indicated below. Copies of 

meeting minutes will be available 

within 90 days. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nish 

Acharya, Office of Innovation and 

Entrepreneurship, Room 7019, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington 

DC 20230, telephone 202–482–4068; 

fax: 202–273–4781. Please reference, 

‘‘NACIE March 13, 2012’’ in the subject 

line of your fax. 

Dated: February 24, 2012. 

Nishith H. Acharya, 

Director, Office of Innovation & 

Entrepreneurship, U.S. Department of 

Commerce. 

[FR Doc. 2012–4868 Filed 2–28–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–03–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–890 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation 

of Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) has received requests to 

conduct an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on wooden 

bedroom furniture from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). The 

anniversary month of this order is 

January. In accordance with the 

Department’s regulations, we are 

initiating this administrative review. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
12236 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 29, 2012 / Notices 

1See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 

2005). 

2Producers or exporters may also fulfill this 

requirement by submitting a properly filed and 

timely quantity and value (‘‘Q&V’’) questionnaire 

response that indicates that the entity or entities 

had no exports, sales, or entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR. See discussion infra 

providing further information regarding Q&V 

questionnaires. 

3See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

DATES: Effective Date: February 29, 

2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rebecca Pandolph or Patrick O’Connor, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–3627 or (202) 482– 

0989 respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background 

The Department received timely 

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), for an administrative review 

of the antidumping duty order on 

wooden bedroom furniture from the 

PRC covering multiple entities.1 The 

Department is now initiating an 

administrative review of the order 

covering those entities. All deadlines for 

the submission of various types of 

information, certifications, or comments 

or actions by the Department discussed 

below refer to the number of calendar 

days from the applicable starting time. 

Notice of No Sales 

If a producer or exporter named in 

this notice of initiation had no exports, 

sales, or entries during the period of 

review (‘‘POR’’), it must notify the 

Department within 60 days of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register.2 All submissions must be filed 

electronically at http://iaaccess.trade.

gov in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303.3 Such submissions are subject 

to verification in accordance with 

section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (‘‘Act’’). Further, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(3)(ii), a copy of each request 

must be served on the petitioner and 

each exporter or producer specified in 

the request. 

Respondent Selection 

Section 777A(c)(1) of the Act directs 

the Department to calculate individual 

dumping margins for each known 

exporter and producer of the subject 

merchandise. Where it is not practicable 

to examine all known producers/ 

exporters of subject merchandise, 

section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act permits 

the Department to examine exporters 

and producers accounting for the largest 

volume of the subject merchandise from 

the exporting country that can be 

reasonably examined. Due to the large 

number of firms for which an 

administrative review of wooden 

bedroom furniture has been requested, 

and the Department’s experience 

regarding the resulting administrative 

burden of reviewing each company for 

which a request has been made, the 

Department is considering exercising its 

authority to limit the number of 

respondents selected for review in 

accordance with the Act. 

In the event that the Department 

limits the number of respondents for 

individual examination in the 

administrative review of wooden 

bedroom furniture, the Department 

intends to select respondents based on 

volume data contained in responses to 

Q&V questionnaires. Further, the 

Department intends to limit the number 

of Q&V questionnaires issued in the 

review based on U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. 

imports of wooden bedroom furniture 

from the PRC. Since the units used to 

measure import quantities are not 

consistent across the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States headings 

identified in the scope of the order on 

wooden bedroom furniture from the 

PRC, the Department will limit the 

number of Q&V questionnaires issued 

based on the import values in CBP data 

which will serve as a proxy for import 

quantities. Parties subject to the review 

to which the Department does not send 

a Q&V questionnaire may file a response 

to the Q&V questionnaire by the 

applicable deadline if they desire to be 

included in the pool of companies from 

which the Department will select 

mandatory respondents. Parties will be 

given the opportunity to comment on 

the CBP data used by the Department to 

limit the number of Q&V questionnaires 

issued. We intend to release the CBP 

data under administrative protective 

order (‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an 

APO within seven days of publication of 

this notice in the Federal Register. The 

Department invites comments regarding 

CBP data and respondent selection 

within five days of placement of the 

CBP data on the record. 

In this case, the Department has 

decided to send Q&V questionnaires to 

the 20 companies for which reviews 

were requested with the largest total 

values of subject merchandise imported 

into the United States during the POR 

according to CBP data. The Department 

will issue the Q&V questionnaires the 

day after this notice is signed. In 

addition, the Q&V questionnaire will be 

available on the Department’s Web site 

at http://trade.gov/ia/ on the date this 

notice is signed. The responses to the 

Q&V questionnaire must be received by 

the Department by March 15, 2012. 

Please be advised that due to the time 

constraints imposed by the statutory 

and regulatory deadlines for 

antidumping duty administrative 

reviews, the Department does not intend 

to grant any extensions for the 

submission of responses to the Q&V 

questionnaire. 

In general, the Department has found 

that determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, the Department 

will not conduct collapsing analyses at 

the respondent selection phase of this 

review and will not collapse companies 

at the respondent selection phase unless 

there has been a determination to 

collapse certain companies in a 

previous segment of this antidumping 

proceeding (i.e., investigation, 

administrative review, new shipper 

review or changed circumstances 

review). For any company subject to this 

review, if the Department determined, 

or continued to treat, that company as 

collapsed with others, the Department 

will assume that such companies 

continue to operate in the same manner 

and will collapse them for respondent 

selection purposes. Otherwise, the 

Department will not collapse companies 

for purposes of respondent selection. 

Parties are requested to (a) identify 

which companies subject to review 

previously were collapsed, and (b) 

provide a citation to the proceeding in 

which they were collapsed. Further, if 

companies are requested to complete 

the Q&V questionnaire for purposes of 

respondent selection, in general each 

company must report Q&V data 

separately for itself. Parties should not 

include data for any other party, even if 

they believe they should be treated as a 

single entity with that other party. If a 

company was collapsed with another 

company or companies in the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding where the Department 

considered collapsing that entity, 

complete quantity and value data for 

that collapsed entity must be submitted. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 29, 2012 / Notices 12237 

4Such entities include entities that have not 

participated in the proceeding, entities that were 

preliminarily granted a separate rate in any 

currently incomplete segment of the proceedings 

(e.g., an ongoing administrative review, new 

shipper review, etc.) and entities that lost their 

separate rate in the most recently completed 

segment of the proceeding in which they 

participated. 

5Only changes to the official company name, 

rather than trade names, need to be addressed via 

a Separate Rate Application. Information regarding 

new trade names may be submitted via a Separate 

Rate Certification. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that has requested a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that the Department 

may extend this time if it is reasonable 

to do so. In order to provide parties 

additional certainty with respect to 

when the Department will exercise its 

discretion to extend this 90-day 

deadline, interested parties are advised 

that, with regard to reviews requested 

on the basis of anniversary months on 

or after August 2011, the Department 

does not intend to extend the 90-day 

deadline unless the requestor 

demonstrates that an extraordinary 

circumstance has prevented it from 

submitting a timely withdrawal request. 

Determinations by the Department to 

extend the 90-day deadline will be 

made on a case-by-case basis. 

Separate Rates 

In proceedings involving non-market 

economy (‘‘NME’’) countries, the 

Department begins with a rebuttable 

presumption that all companies within 

the country are subject to government 

control and, thus, should be assigned a 

single antidumping duty deposit rate. It 

is the Department’s policy to assign all 

exporters of merchandise subject to an 

administrative review in an NME 

country this single rate unless an 

exporter can demonstrate that it is 

sufficiently independent so as to be 

entitled to a separate rate. 

To establish whether a firm is 

sufficiently independent from 

government control of its export 

activities to be entitled to a separate 

rate, the Department analyzes each 

entity exporting the subject 

merchandise under criteria arising from 

the Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Sparklers From the 

People’s Republic of China, 56 FR 20588 

(May 6, 1991), as amplified by Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value: Silicon Carbide From the 

People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 22585 

(May 2, 1994). In accordance with the 

separate-rates test, the Department 

assigns separate rates to companies in 

NME cases only if respondents can 

demonstrate the absence of both de jure 

and de facto government control over 

export activities. 

All firms listed below that wish to 

qualify for separate-rate status in this 

administrative review must complete, as 

appropriate, either a separate-rate 

certification or application, as described 

below. In order to demonstrate separaterate eligibility, the Department requires 

entities for which a review was 

requested and that were assigned a 

separate rate in the most recent segment 

of this proceeding in which they 

participated, to certify that they 

continue to meet the criteria for 

obtaining a separate rate. The Separate 

Rate Certification form will be available 

on the Department’s Web site at 

http://ia.ita.doc.gov/nme/nme-seprate.html. In responding to the 

certification, please follow the 

‘‘Instructions for Filing the 

Certification’’ in the Separate Rate 

Certification. Separate Rate 

Certifications are due to the Department 

no later than 60 days after publication 

of this Federal Register notice. The 

deadline and requirement for submitting 

a Certification applies equally to NMEowned firms, wholly foreign-owned 

firms, and foreign sellers who purchase 

and export subject merchandise to the 

United States. 

Entities that currently do not have a 

separate rate from a completed segment 

of the proceeding 4 should timely file a 

Separate Rate Application to 

demonstrate eligibility for a separate 

rate in this proceeding. In addition, 

companies that received a separate rate 

in a completed segment of the 

proceeding that have subsequently 

made changes, including, but not 

limited to, changes to corporate 

structure, acquisitions of new 

companies or facilities, or changes to 

their official company name,5 should 

timely file a Separate Rate Application 

to demonstrate eligibility for a separate 

rate in this proceeding. The Separate 

Rate Application will be available on 

the Department’s Web site at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov/nme/nme-sep-rate.html. 

In responding to the Separate Rate 

Application, refer to the instructions 

contained in the application. Separate 

Rate Applications are due to the 

Department no later than 60 calendar 

days after publication of this Federal 

Register notice. The deadline and 

requirement for submitting a Separate 

Rate Application applies equally to 

NME-owned firms, wholly foreignowned firms, and foreign sellers that 

purchase and export subject 

merchandise to the United States. 

For exporters and producers who 

submit a separate-rate application or 

certification and subsequently are 

selected as mandatory respondents, 

these exporters and producers will no 

longer be eligible for separate-rate status 

unless they respond to all parts of the 

questionnaire as mandatory 

respondents. 

Notification 

This notice constitutes public 

notification to all firms for which an 

administrative review of wooden 

bedroom furniture has been requested 

and that are seeking separate rate status 

in that review, that they must submit a 

timely Separate Rate Application or 

Certification (as appropriate) as 

described above, in order to receive 

consideration for separate-rate status. 

Firms to which the Department issues a 

Q&V questionnaire must submit a 

timely and complete response to the 

Q&V questionnaire, in addition to a 

timely and complete Separate Rate 

Application or Certification in order to 

receive consideration for separate-rate 

status. In other words, the Department 

will not give consideration to any timely 

Separate Rate Certification or 

Application made by parties to whom 

the Department issued a Q&V 

questionnaire but who failed to respond 

in a timely manner to the Q&V 

questionnaire. Exporters subject to the 

review to which the Department does 

not send a Q&V questionnaire may 

receive consideration for separate-rate 

status if they file a timely Separate Rate 

Application or a timely Separate Rate 

Certification without filing a response to 

the Q&V questionnaire. All information 

submitted by respondents in this 

administrative review is subject to 

verification. As noted above, the 

Separate Rate Certification, the Separate 

Rate Application, and the Q&V 

questionnaire will be available on the 

Department’s Web site on the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. 

Initiation of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on wooden 

bedroom furniture from the PRC with 

respect to the following companies, for 

the January 1, 2011, through December 

31, 2011, POR. We intend to issue the 

final results of this review no later than 

January 31, 2013. 

• Alexandre International Corp.;* 

Southern Art Development Ltd.;* 

Alexandre Furniture (Shenzhen) Co., 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
12238 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 29, 2012 / Notices 

Ltd.;* Southern Art Furniture 

Factory.* 

• Art Heritage International, Ltd.;* 

Super Art Furniture Co., Ltd.;* 

Artwork Metal & Plastic Co., Ltd.;* 

Jibson Industries Ltd.;* Always Loyal 

International* 

• Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai* 

• Billy Wood Industrial (Dong Guan) 

Co., Ltd.;* Great Union Industrial 

(Dongguan) Co., Ltd.;* Time Faith 

Ltd.* 

• Brother Furniture Manufacture Co., 

Ltd. 

• C.F. Kent Co., Inc. 

• C.F. Kent Hospitality, Inc. 

• Champion Sun Industries Limited 

• Changshu HTC Import & Export Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Cheng Meng Furniture (Pte) Ltd.;* 

Cheng Meng Decoration & Furniture 

(Suzhou) Co., Ltd.* 

• Chuan Fa Furniture Factory* 

• Clearwise Company Limited* 

• COE Ltd.* 

• Contact Co., Ltd. 

• Creation Industries Co., Ltd. 

• Dalian Huafeng Furniture Co., Ltd.*/ 

Dalian Huafeng Furniture Group Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Decca Furniture Ltd.* 

• Denny’s Furniture Associates Corp. 

• Denny’s International Co., Ltd. 

• Der Chang Wooden Works 

• Der Cheng Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Dong Guan Golden Fortune 

Houseware Co., Ltd. 

• Dongguan Bon Ten Furniture Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Cambridge Furniture Co., 

Ltd.;* Glory Oceanic Co., Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Chunsan Wood Products 

Co., Ltd. 

• Dongguan Creation Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Dongguan Grand Style Furniture Co., 

Ltd.;* Hong Kong Da Zhi Furniture 

Co., Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Great Reputation Furniture 

Co., Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Haoshun Furniture Ltd. 

• Dongguan Hero Way Woodwork Co., 

Ltd.;* Dongguan Da Zhong Woodwork 

Co., Ltd.;* Hero Way Enterprises 

Ltd.;* Well Earth International Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Hua Ban Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Dongguan Huansheng Furniture Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Hung Sheng Artware 

Products Co., Ltd.;* Coronal 

Enterprise Co., Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Kin Feng Furniture Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Kingstone Furniture Co., 

Ltd.;* Kingstone Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Landmark Furniture 

Products Ltd. 

• Dongguan Liaobushangdun Huada 

Furniture Factory;* Great Rich (Hk) 

Enterprises Co., Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Lung Dong Furniture Co., 

Ltd.;* Dongguan Dong He Furniture 

Co., Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Mingsheng Furniture Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Mu Si Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Singways Furniture Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Sundart Timber Products 

Co., Ltd. 

• Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co. 

• Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., 

Ltd.;* Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry 

Co., Ltd.;* Taicang Fairmount Designs 

Furniture Co., Ltd.;* Meizhou Sunrise 

Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Sunshine Furniture Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Dongguan Yihaiwei Furniture 

Limited.* 

• Dongguan Yujia Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Dongying Huanghekou Furniture 

Industry Co., Ltd.* 

• Dorbest Ltd.;* Rui Feng Woodwork 

Co., Ltd. aka Rui Feng Woodwork 

(Dongguan) Co., Ltd.;* Rui Feng 

Lumber Development Co., Ltd. aka 

Rui Feng Lumber Development 

(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.* 

• Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.;* Eurosa 

Furniture Co., (Pte) Ltd.* 

• Ever Spring Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Evershine Enterprise Co. 

• Fairmont Designs 

• Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd.* 

• Fleetwood Fine Furniture Lp. 

• Foliot Furniture Inc. 

• Foliot Furniture Corporation 

• Foliot Furniture Pacific Inc. 

• Forward Win Enterprises Co. Ltd. 

• Foshan Guanqiu Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Fuijian Lianfu Forestry Co, Ltd. aka 

Fujian Wonder Pacific Inc.;* Fuzhou 

Huan Mei Furniture Co., Ltd.;* 

Jiangsu Dare* 

• Fujian Putian Jinggong Furniture Co., 

Ltd. 

• Gainwell Industries Limited 

• Garri Furniture (Dong Guan) Co., 

Ltd.;* Molabile International, Inc.;* 

Weei Geo Enterprise Co., Ltd.* 

• Golden Well International (HK) Ltd.* 

• Gotop Global Inc. 

• Gotop Global Ltd. 

• Green River Wood (Dongguan) Ltd. 

• Guangdong Gainwell Industrial 

Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Guangdong Sunwin Green Furniture 

Industry Group Co., Ltd. 

• Guangzhou Maria Yee Furnishings 

Ltd.;* Pyla HK, Ltd.;* Maria Yee, 

Inc.* 

• Hainan Jong Bao Lumber Co., Ltd.;* 

Jibbon Enterprise Co., Ltd.* 

• Hang Hai Woodcraft’s Art Factory* 

• Hangzhou Cadman Trading Co., Ltd.* 

• Hong Kong Jingbi Group 

• Hualing Furniture (China) Co., Ltd.;* 

Tony House Manufacture (China) Co., 

Ltd.;* Buysell Investments Ltd.;* 

Tony House Industries Co., Ltd.* 

• Huasen Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Jardine Enterprise, Ltd.* 

• Jiangmen Kinwai Furniture 

Decoration Co., Ltd.* 

• Jiangmen Kinwai International 

Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Jiangsu Weifu Group Fullhouse 

Furniture Manufacturing Corp. 

• Jiangsu Xiangsheng Bedtime 

Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Jiangsu Yuexing Furniture Group Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Jiant Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Jiedong Lehouse Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• King Kei Trading Company Limited 

• King’s Way Furniture Industries Co., 

Ltd. 

• Kingsyear, Ltd. 

• Kuan Lin Furniture (Dong Guan) Co., 

Ltd.;* Kuan Lin Furniture Factory;* 

Kuan Lin Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Kunshan Lee Wood Product Co., Ltd.* 

• Kunshan Summit Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Langfang Tiancheng Furniture Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Leefu Wood (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.;* 

King Rich International, Ltd.* 

• Link Silver Ltd. (V.I.B.) 

• Locke Furniture Factory;* Kai Chan 

Furniture Co., Ltd.;* Kai Chan (Hong 

Kong) Enterprise Ltd.;* Taiwan Kai 

Chan Co., Ltd.* 

• Longkou Huangshan Furniture 

Factory.* 

• Longrange Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Marvin Furniture (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. 

• Meikangchi (Nantong) Furniture 

Company Ltd.* 

• Meubles Foliot Inc. 

• Moonart Furniture Group 

• Moonart International Inc. 

• Nanhai Baiyi Woodwork Co., Ltd.* 

• Nanhai Jiantai Woodwork Co., Ltd.;* 

Fortune Glory Industrial Ltd. (H.K. 

Ltd.)* 

• Nanjing Jardine Enterprises, Ltd. 

• Nanjing Nanmu Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Nantong Dongfang Orient Furniture 

Co., Ltd.* 

• Nantong Yangzi Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Nantong Yushi Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Nathan International Ltd.;* Nathan 

Rattan Factory* 

• Ningbo Fubang Furniture Industries 

Limited 

• Ningbo Furniture Industries Company 

Ltd. 

• Ningbo Techniwood Furniture 

Industries Limited 

• Northeast Lumber Co., Ltd. 

• Passwell Corporation; * Pleasant 

Wave Ltd.* 

• Passwell Wood Corporation 

• Perfect Line Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Prime Wood International Co., Ltd; * 

Prime Best International Co., Ltd.; * 

Prime Best Factory; * Liang Huang 

(Jiaxing) Enterprise Co., Ltd.* 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 29, 2012 / Notices 12239 

• Putian Jinggong Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Qingdao Liangmu Co., Ltd.* 

• Qingdao Shengchang Wooden Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Restonic (Dongguan) Furniture Ltd.; * 

Restonic Far East (Samoa) Ltd.* 

• Rizhao Sanmu Woodworking Co., 

Ltd.* 

• S.Y.C Family Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

• Samso Industries Ltd. 

• Season Furniture Manufacturing 

Co.; * Season Industrial Development 

Co.* 

• Sen Yeong International Co., Ltd.; * 

Sheh Hau International Trading Ltd.* 

• Senyuan Furniture Group. 

• Shanghai Aosen Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Shanghai Fangjia Industry Co. Ltd.* 

• Shanghai Hospitality Product Mfg., 

Co., Ltd. 

• Shanghai Industries Group 

• Shanghai Jian Pu Export & Import Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Shanghai Kent Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Shanghai Maoji Imp and Exp Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Shanghai Season Industry & 

Commerce Co., Ltd. 

• Shanghai Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Shanghai Zhiyi (Jiashun) Furniture 

Co., Ltd. 

• Shanghai Zhiyi Furniture and 

Decoration Co., Ltd. 

• Shaoxing Mengxing Furniture Co., 

Ltd. 

• Sheng Jing Wood Products (Beijing) 

Co., Ltd.; * Telstar Enterprises Ltd.* 

• Shenyang Shining Dongxing 

Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Shenzhen Forest Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Shenzhen Jiafa High Grade Furniture 

Co., Ltd.; * Golden Lion International 

Trading Ltd.* 

• Shenzhen New Fudu Furniture Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Shenzhen Shen Long Hang Industry 

Co., Ltd.* 

• Shenzhen Wonderful Furniture Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Shenzhen Xiande Furniture Factory 

• Shing Mark Enterprise Co., Ltd.; * 

Carven Industries Limited (BVI); * 

Carven Industries Limited (HK); * 

Dongguan Zhenxin Furniture Co., 

Ltd.; * Dongguan Yongpeng Furniture 

Co., Ltd.* 

• Shun Feng Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Songgang Jasonwood Furniture 

Factory; * Jasonwood Industrial Co., 

Ltd. S.A.* 

• Starwood Furniture Manufacturing 

Co., Ltd. 

• Starwood Industries Ltd.* 

• Strongson Furniture (Shenzhen) Co., 

Ltd.; * Strongson Furniture Co., Ltd.; * 

Strongson (HK) Co.* 

• Sundart International, Ltd. 

• Sunforce Furniture (Hui-Yang) Co., 

Ltd.; * Sun Fung Wooden Factory; * 

Sun Fung Co.; * Shin Feng Furniture 

Co., Ltd.; * Stupendous International 

Co., Ltd.* 

• Superwood Co., Ltd.; * Lianjiang 

Zongyu Art Products Co., Ltd.* 

• Tarzan Furniture Industries, Ltd. 

• Teamway Furniture (Dong Guan) 

Ltd.; * Brittomart Inc.* 

• Techniwood (Macao Commercial 

Offshore) Limited. 

• Techniwood Industries Ltd.; * Ningbo 

Furniture Industries Limited; * 

Ningbo Hengrun Furniture Co. Ltd.* 

• Tianjin Fortune Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Tianjin Master Home Furniture 

Company 

• Tianjin Phu Shing Woodwork 

Enterprise Co., Ltd.* 

• Tradewinds Furniture Ltd.; * Fortune 

Glory Industrial Ltd. (H. K. Ltd.)* 

• Tradewinds International Enterprise 

Ltd. 

• Transworld (Zhang Zhou) Furniture 

Co. Ltd.* 

• Trendex Industries Limited 

• Tube-Smith Enterprise (Zhangzhou) 

Co., Ltd.; * Tube-Smith Enterprise 

(Haimen) Co., Ltd.; * Billionworth 

Enterprises Ltd.* 

• U-Rich Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., 

Ltd.; * U-Rich Furniture Ltd.* 

• Wan Bao Chen Group Hong Kong Co., 

Ltd. 

• Wanhengtong Nueevder (Furniture) 

Manufacture Co., Ltd.;* Dongguan 

Wanengtong Industry Co., Ltd.* 

• Wanvog Furniture (Kunshan) Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Winny Overseas, Ltd.; * Zhongshan 

Winny Furniture Ltd.; * Winny 

Universal Ltd.* 

• Woodworth Wooden Industries (Dong 

Guan) Co., Ltd.* 

• World Design International Co., Ltd. 

• Xiamen Yongquan Sci-Tech 

Development Co., Ltd.* 

• Xilinmen Furniture Co., Ltd.* 

• Xingli Arts & Crafts Factory of 

Yangchun 

• Yeh Brothers World Trade, Inc.* 

• Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd.; * 

Guangdong Yihua Timber Industry 

Co., Ltd.* 

• Yuexing Group Co., Ltd. 

• Zhang Zhou Sanlong Wood Product 

Co., Ltd.* 

• Zhangjiagang Daye Hotel Furniture 

Co., Ltd.* 

• Zhangjiagang Zheng Yan Decoration 

Co., Ltd.* 

• Zhangjiang Sunwin Arts & Crafts Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Zhangzhou Guohui Industrial & Trade 

Co. Ltd.* 

• Zhejiang Shaoxing Huaweimei 

Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific & 

Educational Equipment Co., Ltd.* 

• Zhong Shan Fullwin Furniture Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Zhong Shan Heng Fu Furniture Co. 

• Zhongshan Fengheng Furniture Co., 

Ltd. 

• Zhongshan Fookyik Furniture Co., 

Ltd.* 

• Zhongshan Gainwell Furniture Co., 

Ltd. 

• Zhongshan Golden King Furniture 

Industrial Co., Ltd.* 

• Zhongshan Gotop Furniture Co., Ltd 

• Zhongshang Yiming Furniture Co., 

Ltd. 

• Zhoushan For-Strong Wood Co., Ltd.* 

* These companies had a separate rate in 

the most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which they participated. 

During any administrative review 

covering all or part of a period falling 

between the first and second or third 

and fourth anniversary of the 

publication of an antidumping duty 

order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a 

determination under 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or 

suspended investigation (after sunset 

review), the Secretary, if requested by a 

domestic interested party within 30 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the review, will 

determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. 

United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed. Cir. 

2002), as appropriate, whether 

antidumping duties have been absorbed 

by an exporter or producer subject to the 

review if the subject merchandise is 

sold in the United States through an 

importer that is affiliated with such 

exporter or producer. The request must 

include the name(s) of the exporter or 

producer for which the inquiry is 

requested. 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On 

January 22, 2008, the Department 

published Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Documents Submission Procedures; 

APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 

22, 2008). Those procedures apply to 

the administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on wooden 

bedroom furniture from the PRC which 

is being initiated through this notice. 

Parties that wish to participate in the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

of wooden bedroom furniture from the 

PRC should ensure that they meet the 

requirements in these procedures (e.g. 

the filing of separate letters of 

appearance as discussed in 19 CFR 

351.103 (d)). 

Any party submitting factual 

information in an antidumping duty or 

countervailing duty proceeding must 

certify to the accuracy and completeness 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
12240 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 29, 2012 / Notices 

6See section 782(b) of the Act. 

7See Certification of Factual Information to 

Import Administration During Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Interim Final 

Rule, 76 FR 7491 (February 10, 2011) (’’Interim 

Final Rule’’), amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1) and 

(2). 

of that information.6 Parties are hereby 

reminded that revised certification 

requirements are in effect for company/ 

government officials as well as their 

representatives in all segments of any 

antidumping duty or countervailing 

duty proceedings initiated on or after 

March 14, 2011.7 The formats for the 

revised certifications are provided at the 

end of the Interim Final Rule. The 

Department intends to reject factual 

submissions in any proceeding 

segments initiated on or after March 14, 

2011 if the submitting party does not 

comply with the revised certification 

requirements. 

This initiation and notice are in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act (19 USC 1675(a)), and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: February 23, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–4839 Filed 2–28–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of 

Scientific Instruments 

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 

36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we 

invite comments on the question of 

whether instruments of equivalent 

scientific value, for the purposes for 

which the instruments shown below are 

intended to be used, are being 

manufactured in the United States. 

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 

301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and 

be postmarked on or before March 20, 

2012. Address written comments to 

Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 

3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

Washington, DC 20230. Applications 

may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 

5 p.m. at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce in Room 3720. 

Docket Number: 12–004. Applicant: 

Max Planck Florida Institute, 5353 

Parkside Dr MC 19–RE, Jupiter, FL 

33458. Instrument: Freeze Fracture/ 

Freeze Etch device. Manufacturer: JEOL 

Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: The 

instrument will be used to reveal the 

two-dimensional localization of 

membrane proteins using freeze fracture 

replica immuno-gold labeling, including 

all kinds of receptors and channels. 

Because freeze-fracture replica immunogold labeling has a high sensitivity for 

the detection of the epitope of the target 

molecules, small numbers of receptors 

that would be easily missed by LM or 

by conventional immuno-EM can be 

revealed using this instrument in 

particular unknown subcellular 

locations. Justification for Duty-Free 

Entry: There are no instruments of the 

same general category manufactured in 

the United States. Application accepted 

by Commissioner of Customs: February 

8, 2012. 

Dated: February 22, 2012. 

Gregory Campbell, 

Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement Office. 

[FR Doc. 2012–4837 Filed 2–28–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of 

Scientific Instruments 

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 

36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we 

invite comments on the question of 

whether instruments of equivalent 

scientific value, for the purposes for 

which the instruments shown below are 

intended to be used, are being 

manufactured in the United States. 

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 

301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and 

be postmarked on or before March 20, 

2012. Address written comments to 

Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 

3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

Washington, DC 20230. Applications 

may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 

5 p.m. at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce in Room 3720. 

Docket Number: 11–074. Applicant: 

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 4000 

Jones Bridge Rd., Chevy Chase, MD 

20815. Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech 

Republic. Intended Use: The instrument 

will be used to understand how proteins 

interact with DNA, with a focus on 

proteins that are involved in DNA 

damage recognition and repair. The 

experiments will consist of direct visual 

observations of fluorescently tagged 

DNA and DNA-bound protein molecules 

using total internal reflection 

fluorescence microscopy. The 

instrument will provide the capability 

to generate ‘‘DNA Curtains.’’ 

Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There 

are no instruments of the same general 

category manufactured in the United 

States. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: December 

21, 2011. 

Docket Number: 12–002. Applicant: 

National Center for Toxicological 

Research, 3900 NCTR Rd., Jefferson, AR 

72079. Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: JEOL Instruments, Japan. 

Intended Use: The instrument will be 

used to determine the toxicity of 

nanoscale metal oxides culutured cells, 

quantifying the distribution and toxicity 

of nanoscale silver and metal oxides, 

and determining the genotoxicity of 

nanoscale materials in cultured cells. 

Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There 

are no instruments of the same general 

category manufactured in the United 

States. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: January 10, 

2012. 

Docket Number: 12–005. Applicant: 

VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Azhar 

Lab, Bldg 4, Room C320, 3801 Miranda 

Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94304–1207. 

Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech 

Republic. Intended Use: The instrument 

will be used to study cell cultures and 

lab animal tissue specimens for 

verification of normal morphological 

features or morphological changes, as 

well as searching for proteins of interest 

labeled with commercially available 

colloidal gold conjugated to antibodies. 

Cellular organelles can be clearly seen 

and identified using this instrument, 

which would not be visible with a light 

microscope. Justification for Duty-Free 

Entry: There are no instruments of the 

same general category manufactured in 

the United States. Application accepted 

by Commissioner of Customs: February 

8, 2012. 

Docket Number: 12–006. Applicant: 

William Patterson University, 300 

Pompon Rd., Wayne, NJ 07470. 

Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: Hitachi High 

Technologies America Inc, Japan. 

Intended Use: The instrument will be 

used to study specimens including 

animal tissues, bacteria, insects and 

parasites, involving the examination of 

their morphological and structural 

features. Justification for Duty-Free 

Entry: There are no instruments of the 

same general category manufactured in 

the United States. Application accepted 

by Commissioner of Customs: February 

13, 2012. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES