alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1444 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1444

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the meaning of 
    ``combat with the enemy'' for purposes of service-connection of 
                             disabilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2009

   Mr. Kerry introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the meaning of 
    ``combat with the enemy'' for purposes of service-connection of 
                             disabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Compensation Owed for Mental Health 
Based on Activities in Theater Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Act'' or 
the ``COMBAT PTSD Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF MEANING OF ``COMBAT WITH THE ENEMY'' FOR 
              PURPOSES OF SERVICE-CONNECTION OF DISABILITIES.

    (a) Clarification.--Section 1154(b) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``In the case'' and inserting ``(1) In the 
        case''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) For the purposes of this subsection, the term `combat with 
the enemy' includes service on active duty--
            ``(A) in a theater of combat operations (as determined by 
        the Secretary in consultation with the Secretary of Defense) 
        during a period of war; or
            ``(B) in combat against a hostile force during a period of 
        hostilities.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Paragraph (2) of subsection (b) of section 
1154 of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall 
apply with respect to a claim for disability compensation under chapter 
11 of such title pending on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 15

- 00032

- CR

DAMON LAVELLE ASBERR Y , Appellant

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007

- 1625

- C2A

O R D E R

The Court has received the Court of Criminal Appeals’ mandate which issued on January 3, 2017. This appeal was remanded for reconsideration in light of all the evidence before the trial court in making its ruling. We abated this appeal on January 18, 201 7 to the trial court for preparation of a record for our review of the merits of the appeal. It is reinstated as of the date of this

order.Asberry v. State Page 2

The appeal now stands at the point as if the record has just been filed, and appellant's brief on remand is due 30 days from the date of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
38.6(a); Robinson v. State , 790 S.W.2d 334, 335

- 36 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). The State’s brief on remand is due 30 days after appellant’s brief is filed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(b). Because

the record wa s not complete at the time the initial briefing in this appeal occurred, the parties will not be able to rely on their prior briefs. If a brief on remand is not timely filed, this proceeding must be abated to the trial court for a hearing to determine why no brief has been timely filed on behalf of appellant.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(b).

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed March 8, 2017
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05279**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  05279\05279_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 05279\05279_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05279\05279_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05279\05279_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05279\05279_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05279\05279_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05279\Certification Statement Plant ID 05279.pdf Plant certification statement 05279\Supplemental Documents\05279_Part A A5-2 Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05279\Supplemental Documents\05279_Part A A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05279\05279_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05279\05279_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
DISMISS; Opinion Filed November 25, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01761-CR

JOE EARL WALTON, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-51913-Y

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers, and Myers

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s counsel has approved the 

motion.

The Court hereby GRANTS the motion to dismiss and ORDERS the appeal 

DISMISSED and that this decision be certified below for observance. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

131761F.U05
-2-

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT

JOE EARL WALTON, JR., Appellant 

No. 05-13-01761-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the Criminal District Court

No. 7 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F12-51913-Y).

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers, 

Justices Bridges and Lang-Miers 

participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT appellant’s motion to voluntarily 

dismiss his appeal and DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 25th day of November, 2014.
#### John PITTSER, Appellant (Employee-Claimant), v. NATRONA COUNTY ROAD & BRIDGE, Appellee (Employee-Respondent).

No. 87-78.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Aug. 6, 1987.

Donald L. Painter, Casper, for appellant.

Eric A. Easton, Casper, for appellee.

Before BROWN, C.J., and THOMAS, CARDINE, URBIGKIT, and MACY, JJ.

MACY, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the claim of appellant John Pittser for benefits provided under the Wyoming Worker’s Compensation Act for nontrau-*403matic mental injury arising from his employment with appellee Natrona County Road & Bridge.

We affirm.'

The only question to be considered by this Court is whether or not appellant presented sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he was entitled to benefits for nontraumatic mental injury.

In *Graves v. Utah Power & Light Company,*Wyo., 713 P.2d 187, 193 (1986), this Court held that:

> “A worker seeking compensation for nontraumatic mental injury must show that the injury was caused by workplace stress of greater magnitude than the day-to-day mental stresses experienced by other workers employed in the same or similar jobs.”

It is incumbent upon a claimant to introduce some evidence of the usual stresses experienced by other workers. Id. at 194.

The district court dismissed appellant’s claim because he “failed in his burden of proving unusual workplace stress, in that [appellant] did not introduce evidence regarding stress generally encountered by workers in the same or similar industry.” Although appellant did present testimony which described in some detail his mental injury and workplace stress and which attributed these to specific incidents at work, he did not introduce any comparative-stress evidence. Given the total absence of evidence of usual workplace stress, the district court did not err in granting appellee’s motion to dismiss.

Affirmed.

URBIGKIT, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

URBIGKIT, Justice,

dissenting.

My perception of human behavior and the anatomy of disability has not been altered by any more recently acquired information or by the present opinion of this court. For the reasons stated in dissent in *Graves v. Utah Power & Light Company,*Wyo., 713 P.2d 187 (1986), I will now also dissent from this decision constituting a benefit denial of a job-related mental injury-
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


   
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (number 333-20043) of United Dental Care, Inc., of our
report dated February 23, 1998, except for Note 12, as to which the date is
March 11, 1998, appearing on page F-2 of this Form 10-K/A. We also consent to
the application of such report to the Financial Statement Schedule for the
three years ended December 31, 1997 appearing as Exhibit 99.2 to this Form
10-K/A when such schedule is read in conjunction with the financial statements
referred to in our report.
    


   
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
    

   
Dallas, Texas
July 31, 1998
SCPR-14-0001306

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN RE JULIET ANN FOLLANSBEE, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Petitioner Juliet Ann

Follansbee’s petition to resign and surrender her license to

practice law in the State of Hawai#i, filed pursuant to Rule 1.10

of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH),

and of the affidavits and exhibits in support thereof, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g),

that Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and

record requirements of RSCH Rule 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the

name of Petitioner Juliet Ann Follansbee, attorney number 7121,

from the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai#i, effective

with the filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 3, 2014.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-14-0001306

03-DEC-2014

10:13 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,317
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,075
<INVENTORY>                                     32,311
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,551
<PP&E>                                         276,399
<DEPRECIATION>                                 128,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 516,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,601
<BONDS>                                        294,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           874
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   516,143
<SALES>                                        575,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               575,743
<CGS>                                          392,226
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  556,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,312
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,027
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,314)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,832
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,706)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (744)
<CHANGES>                                      (9,450)
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7679

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BETTY JEAN MURPHY-BARBER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-89-280)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 19, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Betty Jean Murphy-Barber, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order affirming

the magistrate judge's order denying her motion for transcripts at

government expense. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Murphy, No. CR-89-280 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

| (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| (2)    | The      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|   |
|   | Dated      this 23rd day of March, 2009.                                                                                                                             |
|   |

|                                              |   |   |                                |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/       Andrew Brodkey                     |   |   | /s/       Jas Butalia          |   |
| Name:      Andrew Brodkey                         |   |   | Name:      Jas Butalia              |   |
| Title:      President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   | Title:      Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-502]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XT82


Marine Mammals; File No. 14676

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a major amendment to Permit No. 
14676 has been issued to Paul Ponganis, Ph.D., University of California 
at San Diego, La Jolla, CA for research on California sea lions 
(Zalophus californianus).

ADDRESSES: The permit amendment and related documents are available for 
review upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; 
phone (301) 427-8401; fax (301) 713-0376; and
    Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA 90802-4213; phone (562) 980-4001; fax (562) 980-4018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tammy Adams or Amy Sloan, (301) 427-
8401.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 7, 2011, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (76 FR 68719) that a request for an amendment 
Permit No. 14676 to conduct research on California sea lions had been 
submitted by the above-named applicant. The requested permit amendment 
has been issued under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act 
of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and the regulations 
governing the taking and importing of marine mammals (50 CFR part 216).
    The amendment includes authorization for capture of up to 30 
animals over two field seasons and an additional procedure, deployment 
of a heart rate/stroke rate recorder on half of the animals. The 
amendment is valid through the original permit expiration date, 
February 1, 2015.
    In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), a final determination has been made that the 
activity proposed is categorically excluded from the requirement to 
prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.

     Dated: January 9, 2012.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-502 Filed 1-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### STEVEN B. KULMAC *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

*Raymond J. Rigat,*in support of the petition.

*LeonF. Dalbec, Jr.,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 17, 1998

The petitioner Steven B. Kulmac’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 935 (AC 16805), is denied.

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal.
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date:  |                           | March 30, 2011           |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|--------------------------|
|   |   |                           |                     |
|   |   |                           |                     |
|   | By:    |       | /s/ Frederic W.J. Birner |
|   | Name:  |                           | Frederic W.J. Birner     |
|   | Title: |                           | Chief Executive Officer  |
|   |   |                           |                     |
|   |   |                           |                     |
|   | By:    |                           | /s/ Dennis N. Genty      |
|   | Name:  |                           | Dennis N. Genty          |
|   | Title: |                           | Chief Financial Officer  |

----
Form of Common Stock Certificate


     

    Exhibit
      4.1

     

     

    

     

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

      For
        Value Received, ___________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
        __________________________________________________________ Shares represented
        by
        the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
        _______________________________________________ Attorney to transfer the
        said
        Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
        substitution in the premises.

      


      Dated
        ___________________

      


      In
        presence of ________________________________

       

       

      NOTICE:
        THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN
        UPON
        THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
        ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Techprecision Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three and six months  ended September
30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Louis A. Winoski, the Interim Chief Executive Officer,
and I, Richard F. Fitzgerald, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      November 12, 2009
            /s/Louis
      A. WinoskiLouis
      A. WinoskiInterim
      Chief Executive OfficerDated:
      November 12, 2009
            /s/Richard
      F. FitzgeraldRichard
      F. FitzgeraldChief
      Financial Officer