U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIOJ l ^ ^

FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N WISCONSI N AVIATION , INC . 174 1 Rive rDriv e - , Watertown , W l 5309 4 Defendan t V . FA ACas e No . 2007SW9100S 0 (Judg e no t assigned ) FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N fs^UT ^ 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . lH-\f \ O-tilO " ' Plaintiff , DEFENDANT' S MOTIO N TO DISMIS S COMPLAIN T Wisconsi n Aviation , Inc. , Defendant , Pro Se , move s th e Court , pursuan tt o 14CFR , Sec . 13.218(1 ) an d (2 ) t o dismis s th e Complain t file d i n thi s actio n o n Ma y18 , 2010 . A n affidavi ti n suppor to fthi s motio n i s attache d heret o an d as ground s fo rsuc h dismissal . Defendan tallege s th e following : 1 . That th e lengt h o ftim e th e cas e ha s bee n pendin g i s excessive . 2 . That th e Plaintif fha s faile d t o answe ral l th e Defendant' s questions . 3 . That th e fou rindividual s initiall yhired/transferre d d o no tfal l unde rth e auspice s o f1 4 CF R Par t 135.251(a ) no r1 4 CF

R Part 121 , Appendi xI . 4 . That th e fou remployee s wer e dru g teste d an d negativ e result s obtaine d prio rt o thei r hiring/transferrin g fro m non-safety-sensitiv e function s t o safety-sensitiv e functions . 5 . That ther e wer e n o Part 121/Par t13 5 drug-relate d regulation s violated . WHEREFORE , fo rth e reason s state d herei n an d as supporte d b yDefendant' s Affidavit , Wisconsi n Aviation , Inc. , respectfull yrequest s tha t th e Cour t ente ra n orde rdismissin g th e Complain tfile d i n thi s matte ro n Ma y18 , 2010 . 

# Dated : 0//^/ D Bv : ^M^fi W€'S^^ J fl^fit i pTeaum , President/C I j^pf h [

ABa President/CE O isconsi n Aviation , Inc . Defendan t 

# CEIVE D Wisconsi n Aviation , Inc . 174 1 Rive rDriv e Watertown , W l 5309 4 Defendan t JU M 2 2 201 0 Ph : 920/261-456 7 

# HbARIN G DOCKE TU.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WISCONSI N AVIATION , INC . 174 1 Rive rDriv e Watertown , W l 5309 4 Defendan t FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Plaintiff , FA ACas e No . 2007SW91005 0 (Judg e no tassigned )

AFFIDAVI TI N SUPPORTO F DEFENDANT' S MOTIO N T O DISMIS S TH E STATE O F WISCONSI N } }s s DAN E COUNT

Y} Jame s A . Schumacher , afte rfirs t bein g dul yswor n unde roath , state s th e following : 1 . I a m a n employe e wit h th e Defendant , Wisconsi n Aviation , Inc. , an d hav e acte d a s th e specia l project s manage ro n th e above-captione d matter . 2 . Afte rconductin g a revie wo fm yfile s an d records , I determin e th e followin g t o b e a n accurat e accoun t o fthi s matter . 3 . Thi s complain t ha s bee n pendin g fo rove r4 2 months , includin g tw o excessiv e period s o fn o communication s whatsoeve rfro m th e Plaintiff , on e lastin g 9 month s an d th e secon d fo ra perio d o f2 1 months . 4 . Th e Defendant , throughou t thi s process , has expeditiousl yresponde d t o an yan d al l writte n correspondence , telephoni cconversations , an d emai l exchange s i n a complet e an d informativ e manne rwithi n th e respons e time s requeste d b yth e Plaintiff . 5 . Throughou t th e complaint , th e Plaintif fstate d tha tth e Defendan tfaile d t o administe rrequisit e dru g test s and/o rreceiv e negativ e tes tresult s as require d by1 4 CF R Part135.251(a ) prio rt o hirin g o rtransferrin g fou rpersonne l t o perfor m safety-sensitiv e function s as liste d i n 1 4 CF R Par t 121 , Appendi xI . [Th e abov e tw o reference s appl yt o Federa l Aviatio n Regulation s (FAR) Part121 , Ai rCarrie r Operations , an d Part 135 , Commute ran d On-Deman d Operation s only. ] 6 . Throughou t th e complaint , th e Plaintif fidentifie d fou remployee s tha twer e eithe rhire d fo ro r transferre d t o "maintenanc e functions. " Reference s liste d i n paragrap h thre e abov e identif y "maintenanc e duties " as safety-sensitiv e functions .7 . Throughou t th e exchang e o fcorrespondence , th e Defendan tattempte d t o explai n th e fac ttha t whil e som e o fit s maintenanc e operation s fal l unde rth e auspice s o fFA R Part135 , th e preponderanc e o fit s maintenanc e operation s ar e conducte d unde rFA R Part91 , a sectio n tha t doe s no t requir e dru g o ralcoho l testing . 8 . Th e Defendant' s maintenanc e record s o fth e yea r200 6 reveale d tha ta tota l o f2,47 3 maintenanc e wor k

order s wer e completed , o fwhic h 1,961 , o r79 % o fth e work , wa s performe d o n Par t 9 1 aircraft . Th e remainin g 512 , o r21 % o fth e maintenance , wa s performe d o n Par t135 aircraft . 9. Defendan t ha s prove n tha t i n al l o fth e fou rcases , th e individual s i n questio n wer e no thire d no r transferre d int o position s identifie d i n 1 4 CF R Par t121 , Appendi xI . Individual s i n questio n clearl ywer e teste d an d negativ e result s wer e verifie d befor e th e individual s wer e allowe d t o perfor m safety-sensitiv e functions . Defendan trequeste d Plaintif ft o cit e th e regulation s an d authorit ytha t preclude s hirin g mechanic s fo rnon-safety-sensitiv e dutie s an d the n testin g the m prio rt o assignin g the m t o safety-sensitiv e dutie s (lette rdate d 4/9/2010) . T o date , n o respons e ha s bee n received . 10 . Th e Defendan t explaine d numerou s time s t o th e Plaintif ftha twhe n personne l ar e hired/transferre d fo r"maintenanc e duties, " the yar e specificall yhired/transferre d int o eithe ra non-safety-sensitiv e positio n (Part91 ) or , onl yi fo rwhe n deeme d qualifie d byth e Defendant , assigne d t o safety-sensitiv e position s (Part121/135) . 11 . Th e Plaintif ftotall yfaile d t o acknowledg e tha tth e preponderanc e o fth e Defendant' s operation s d o no t occu runde rauspice s o fth e safety-sensitiv e regulations , tha tth e Defendan tdoe s hir e numerou s employee s fo rnon-safety-sensitiv e operations , an d tha tth e Defendan tdoe s dru g tes t thos e prio rt o tha t performin g dutie s i n safety-sensitiv e areas . Th e Plaintif ffail s t o distinguis h betwee n th e Defendant' s FA R 9 1 an d FA

R 13 5 operation s an d faile d t o sho wwher e safet ywa s compromise d i n an yway , shape , o rform . 12 . O fth e fou rpersonne l liste d i n th e complaint , tw o wer e ne whire s an d tw o wer e transferre d fro m othe rpositions . Al l fou rwer e assigne d t o fil l Par t91 , non-safety-sensitiv e maintenanc e duties .

Subscribe d an d swor n t o befor e m e thi s 11* " dayo fJune , 2010 . Notar yPublic , Stat e o fWisconsi n M ycommissio n i s permanent ., f•

CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E

I hereb ycertif ytha t th e foregoin g Motio n t o Dismis s an d Supportin g Affidavit , i n th e Wisconsi n Aviation , FA ACas e No . 2007SW910050 , have bee n maile d thi s dat e byCertifie d Mail , Retur n Receipt . Requested,to : Autum n Killingha m Enforcemen t Division , AGC-30 0 Offic e o fth e Chie fCounse l Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1

Th e origina l an d a cop ywer e maile d to : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Cler k AGC-400 , Roo m 201 4