alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit10.1**

Paramount AcquisitionCorp.

787 7th Avenue, 48thFloor

New York, New York10019

April 21, 2007

EarlyBirdCapital, Inc.

275 Madison Avenue

Suite 1203

New York, New York 10016

Gentlemen:

Reference is madeto the letter agreements, dated July 25, 2005 (each, a “Letter Agreement”),between EarlyBirdCapital, Inc., Paramount Acquisition Corp. and each of LindsayA. Rosenwald, Lindsay A. Rosenwald 2000 Family Trusts, J. Jay Lobell, I. KeithMaher, Michael Weiser, Arie Belldegrun and Isaac Kier.

Paragraph 2 ofeach Letter Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the phrase “effective date(“Effective Date”) of the registration statement relating to the IPO” with thephrase “consummation of the IPO”. Notwithstanding such amendment, the phrase “Effective Date” as usedelsewhere in each Letter Agreement shall continue to mean the effective date ofthe registration statement relating to the IPO.
|                    | Very truly yours,             |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                    |                          |
|                    | PARAMOUNT ACQUISITION CORP.   |
|                    |                          |
|                    |                          |
|                    | By:                           |   /s/ J. JAY LOBELL |   |
|                    |                          | J. Jay Lobell |
|                    |                          | Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |                          |   |
|                    |                          |   |
| ACNOWLEDGED AND AGREED: |                          |   |
|                    |                          |   |
| EARLYBIRDCAPITAL, INC.  |                          |   |
|                    |                          |   |
| By:                     |   /s/ STEVEN LEVINE |   |   |   |
| Name: Steven Levine     |                          |   |
| Title: CEO              |                          |   |
|                         |                               |  |  |  |  |

 

----
# -State 

# of-- 

# North Dakota Office of the Governor 

### Jack Dalrymple Governor

U.S. EPA Administrator January 23, 2013

c/oJames B. Martin, Regional Administrator U.S. EPA, Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 Dear Mr. Martin: I am submitting to the Environmental ProtectionAgency one hard copy and one electronic copy (CD) ofrevisions to the State Implementation Plan for the Control ofAir Pollution for the State ofNorth Dakota. The electronic copyis an exact copy ofthe hard copy. The State Health Department held a hearing onApril 10, 2012, and received testimony concerning amendments to the Air Pollution Control Rules and changes to the State Implementation Plan. Consideration has been given to the testimony as well as written comments received during the public commentperiod. A copy ofthe hearing record is incorporated with the revisions. Ifyou have any questions concerning the revisions, please feel free to contact the Division ofAir Quality ofthe North Dakota Department ofHealth at (701) 328-5188. Sincerely,

# ~~ Governor C: Terry O'Clair, NDDH 37:68:56

600 E BoulevardAve. • Bismarck, ND 58505-0001 • Phone: 701.328.2200 • Fax: 701.328.2205 • www.govemor.nd.gov
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the
Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  |  | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended June 24, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          |  |                                           
|------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 22, 2009 |  | /s/ Sean M. McCarthy                      
|                          |  | Sean M. McCarthy                          
|                          |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                          |  | (Principal Financial Officer)             

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and will be retained by Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Appendix A:

Current Information Collection Requests

Associated with the

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program
List of Rulemakings Associated with the GHGRP

Title OMB Control Number EPA ICR Number

Information Collection Request for 

the GHGRP

2060-0620 2300.10

GWP Change ICR Change Memo (EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-

0934-0126)

Inputs Rule 2060-0629 2300.12

Subpart W amendments 2060-0620 2300.15

Fluorinated Gas amendments 2060-0650 2373.05

Mobile Sources
#### Phillip Ronald MATHIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-85-22.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 10, 1987.

David Autry, Public Defender, Norman, for appellant.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., Jean M. LeBlanc, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

The appellant, Phillip Ronald Mathis, was tried and convicted in the District Court of Latimer County for the crime of Felo-niously Carrying a Firearm in Case No. CRF-83-92 and was sentenced to ten (10) years imprisonment, and he appeals. Appellant makes several assignments of error, one of which we find dictates reversal of the judgment; therefore, it alone will be addressed.

At the close of the State's case in chief, appellant moved for a directed verdict on the ground that the State failed to establish venue. The trial court overruled his motion.

It is the general rule of this State that the State’s proof of venue in a criminal *313action need not be beyond a reasonable doubt and may be established by direct or circumstantial evidence. *Voran v. State,*536 P.2d 1322 (Okl.Cr.1975). This Court has also held that we will take judicial notice of the boundaries of the counties of the State, and geographical location of cities and towns within the State. *Morris v. State,*363 P.2d 377 (Okl.Cr.1961). However, we have refused to judicially notice streets and buildings when there is no evidence as to the town or city in which they are located. *Id.*

In the present case, the evidence reflects that the crime occurred at Posse’s Bar. This, plus evidence that the crime was investigated by a Latimer County un-dersheriff, are the only indications of venue. The record does not provide evidence in what city or town Posse’s Bar is located, its location in reference to any geographically recognizable point, or whether it is in Latimer County. Consequently, we find that the State failed to prove venue, and the trial court should have sustained appellant’s motion for directed verdict.

The judgment is REVERSED and the case REMANDED for a new trial consistent with this opinion.

BRETT, P.J., and PARKS, J., concur.
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | May      15, 2008 |   | By:    | /s/      H. Kerr Taylor                                                                                                                                                                    |
|--------|-------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |              |   | Name:  | H.      Kerr Taylor                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   |              |   | Title: | President      and Chief Executive Officer of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth III      Corporation, the General Partner of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth      Fund III, Ltd.  |
|   |              |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                       |
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis 

YOUSEF M. ALKADI 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 1394-98-4 PER CURIAM 

 NOVEMBER 24, 1998 

ARLINGTON (COUNTY OF) SCHOOL BOARD AND 

 VIRGINIA MUNICIPAL GROUP SELF-INSURANCE 

 ASSOCIATION 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Yousef M. Alkadi, pro se, on brief). 

 (William S. Sands, Jr.; Duncan and Hopkins, 

on brief), for appellees. 

 On July 14, 1997, Yousef M. Alkadi filed an application with 

the Workers' Compensation Commission seeking temporary total 

disability benefits beginning June 13, 1989, related to his May 

19, 1989 left knee injury. The commission ruled that the 

application was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 

 Alkadi contends that the commission erred. Upon reviewing the 

record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this 

appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the 

commission's decision. See Rule 5A:27. 

 On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable 

to the prevailing party below. See R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v. 

Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). 

 So viewed, the evidence proved that on March 8, 1991, the 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

commission awarded Alkadi medical benefits only for his 

compensable May 19, 1989 left knee injury. In its opinion, the 

commission refused to award Alkadi compensation for work 

incapacity and found that the medical evidence did not prove that 

he sustained work-related disability in excess of seven days. 

Alkadi did not appeal that decision. On July 14, 1997, Alkadi 

filed an application seeking an award of temporary total 

disability benefits beginning June 13, 1989, related to his May 

19, 1989 left knee injury. 

 "A claim for compensation must be filed with the commission 

within two years after the accident or the claim shall be forever 

barred." Mayberry v. Alcoa Bldg. Prods., 18 Va. App. 18, 20, 441 

S.E.2d 349, 350 (1994). Because the commission never entered an 

award for work incapacity, Alkadi's July 14, 1997 application 

cannot be treated as an application for a change in condition. 

See id. Alkadi's application seeking an award of total 

disability benefits was required to be filed within two years 

after his May 19, 1989 accident. See id. at 20-21, 441 S.E.2d at 

350. It was not. Thus, the record clearly supports the 

commission's finding that Alkadi's July 14, 1997 claim was 

time-barred. 

 For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision. 

 Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          30,290
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,223
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                15,750
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    372,157
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        609,564
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,069,121
<DEPOSITS>                                     761,269
<SHORT-TERM>                                   113,961
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,442
<LONG-TERM>                                    111,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,110
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,069,121
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 50,009
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               23,021
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   939
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                73,969
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              30,536
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,693
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           34,276
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      375
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 653
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 26,956<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,253
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      14,253
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,152
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.79
<LOANS-NON>                                        761
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,916
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   227
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 10,157
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,852
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      934
<RECOVERIES>                                       350
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,643
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,643
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
<F1> Includes 2,374 for Special SAIF Assessment
</FN>


</TABLE>
Order entered December 6, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01312
- CV
CHAN IL PAK, Appellant

V. AD VILLARAI, LLC, ET AL, Appellee s On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 06030



### O RDER By letter dated December 5, 2017, the above

- numbered case was set for submission on Friday, December 8, 2017. We REMOVE the case from the submission docket. Appellees have until January 2, 2018 to file a responsive brief or rely on the brief previously filed.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FNANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Frezer, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
      capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      November 14, 2006




By:
            /s/
                David
                KoosDavid
                KoosActing
                Chief Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
      adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
      of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Frezer,
      Inc. and will be retained by Frezer, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 Tronox
        Incorporated
 123
        Robert S. Kerr Avenue
 Oklahoma
        City, OK 73102
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **REGARDING
        PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**
 **FINANCIAL
        STATEMENTS**
 
 
 I,
        Mary
        Mikkelson, the Chief Financial Officer of Tronox Incorporated, in compliance
        with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify in connection with the registrant’s
        report on Form 10-Q for the period that ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) that:
 
 ·
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
                  the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 ·
              information
                  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                  the
                  financial condition and results of operations of the
                  Issuer.
 
 
 /s/
        Mary
        Mikkelson
 __________________________
 
 Mary
        Mikkelson
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 May
        15,
        2006
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1706 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber tow. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2009 

Mr. BARRASSO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber 

tow. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC FIBER TOW. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1706 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic fiber tow 

(polyacrylonitrile tow) containing by weight a minimum 

of 98 percent acrylonitrile, 

not more than 30ppm sodium 

and from 2 to 4 percent 

water, imported in the form 

of three sub-bundles, each 

containing 50,000 filaments 

and with average filament 

measuring 1.2 decitex (plus 

or minus 0.1)(provided for in 

subheading 5501.30.00) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Statement of Additional Information
and the incorporation by reference therein and to the use of our report dated
February 27, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of IDS
Life Insurance Company (name subsequently changed to RiverSource Life
Insurance Company) and to the use of our report dated March 31, 2006 with
respect to the financial statements of American Enterprise Variable Annuity
Account (name subsequently changed to RiverSource Variable Annuity Account) in
the Initial Registration Statement on Form N-4 for the registration of the
RiverSource New Solutions(SM) Variable Annuity offered by RiverSource Life
Insurance Company.

                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                     Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 2, 2007
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Probe Manufacturing, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Quarterly Report for the three months ended June 30, 2007 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:  August 9, 2007   /s/  Reza Zarif ---------------------- Reza Zarif Chief  Executive  Officer Director   Date:  August 9, 2007   /s/  John Bennett ------------------------ John Bennett Chief  Financial  Officer