### Instructions for filling the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. Constituents of concern are: Carbon Monoxide, Formaldehyde, Methane, Speciated Volatile Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs), Speciated Semi HAPs, Sulfur Dioxide, Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, Hydrogen Cyanide, Nitrogen Oxides, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), and Total Suspended Solids (TSS). You must complete 3 separate sampling events for each of the requested constituents. spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in light green are populated using drop

- down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please Do Not modify the structure of this spreadsheet by adding or subtracting
rows, columns, cells. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg Hg +2 

### , or if the Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg 0 

### , HgP, and Hg Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

- Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please determine which units of measure (acfm or dscfm) were used for Exhaust Flow Rate and which units of measure (deg C or deg F) were used for Exhaust Temperature. Fill these units of measure into the Units of Measure field. 2. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of the 3 sample testing periods in the Sample 1, Sample 2, and Sample 3 fields

. 3. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

- downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. Then, enter the input rate of each fuel in the Sample 1, Sample 2, and Sample 3 fields. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero.

### If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

Emission Data

1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each of the 3 samples in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. Constituents of concern are: Carbon Monoxide, Formaldehyde, Methane, Speciated Volatile Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs), Speciated Semi

- Volatile Organic HAPs, Sulfur Dioxide, Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, Hydrogen Cyanide, Nitrogen Oxides, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), and Total Suspended Solids (TSS). You must complete 3 separate sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using Fields shaded in yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in light green are down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated

Please Do Not modify the structure of this spreadsheet by adding or subtracting Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg 0 

### and , HgP, and Hg +2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

- down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions

1. Please determine which units of measure (acfm or dscfm) were used for Exhaust Flow Rate and which units of measure (deg C or deg F) were used for Exhaust Temperature. Fill these units of measure into the Units of Measure field. 2. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of the 3 sample testing periods in the Sample 1, Sample

3. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. Then, enter the input rate of each fuel in the Sample 1, Sample 2, and Sample 3 fields. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero.

### If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero.

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each of the 3 samples in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

525 Hay den H2Control Device Configuraton

Listed (by

boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICRListed (by boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICREIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H2

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Date of Testing Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Basis (W et/Dry ) Exhaust Steam % Moisture Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate

Sample 2 Fuel Input Rate

Sample 3

Emission Test Results CO Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) CO Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) CO Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu)Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Me asurement Me thod Other Supporting

Information

CO Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) CO Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) CO Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA Me thod 10A ) Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H2

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Date of Testing Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Basis (W et/Dry ) Exhaust Steam % Moisture Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate

Sample 2 Fuel Input Rate

Sample 3

Emission Test Results Formaldehyde Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Formaldehyde

Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Formaldehyde Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu)Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Me asurement Me thod Other Supporting

Information

Formaldehyde Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Formaldehyde Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Formaldehyde

Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA Me thod 320)Other Supporting

InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H2

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Basis (W et/Dry ) Exhaust Steam % Moisture Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2

Emission Test Results Me thane Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Me thane Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2)Sample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Me thod Other Supporting Information

Me thane Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Me thane Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Me thane Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Me thane Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2)Test Method Used

(ex. U.S. EPA Me thod 18) Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H2

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Date of Testing 2/23/2010 2/24/2010 2/25/2010 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) 1,966.04 1,974.46 1,955.46 Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 2,831.56 2,814.21 2,799.48 Basis (W et/Dry ) Dry Dry Dry Exhaust Steam % Moisture 13 13.1 12.6 Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 592,000 595,000 587,000 Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 165 165 165

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 bitum inous 2,831.56 2,814.21 2,799.48

Emission Test Results SO2 Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) SO2 Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) SO2 Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) 0.12 48.81 0.12Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr Plant Historian Data MMBtu/hr CEMS Data N/A % Method 26A Test Run Data dscfm Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently deg F Method 26A Test Run Data

Unit of Measure Fuel Flow

Me asurement Method Other Supporting Information MMBtu/hr F-Factor

SO2 Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) SO2 Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) SO2 Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA Me thod 6) 50.60 0.12 49.80Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently

Other Supporting Information CEMS data used in lieu of actual test data, O2 based on CEMS measured CO2 valuesEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H2

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing 2/23/2010 2/24/2010 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) 1,969.94 1,961.33 Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 2,833.48 2,787.43 Basis (W et/Dry ) Dry Dry Exhaust Steam % Moisture 12.90 13.30 Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 591,000 594,000 Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 167 166

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 bitum inous 2,833.48 2,787.43

Emission Test Results Total Vapor Phase Me rcury Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Total Vapor Phase

Me rcury Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) 5.49E-07 5.88E-07



### Data Sheets and QA

/QC Documentation

trap ID Section 1 RUN 1 TRAP A - UNSPIKED 56994 52.9 RUN 1 TRAP B - SPIKED 56952 73.8 RUN 1 TRAP A - UNSPIKED 56989 28.7 RUN 1 TRAP B - SPIKED 56905 48.1 RUN 1 TRAP A - UNSPIKED 56975 25.5 RUN 1 TRAP B - SPIKED 49309 56.9

Start RUN 1 TRAP A - UNSPIKED 2/23/2010 13:18 RUN 1 TRAP B - SPIKED 2/23/2010 13:18 RUN 1 TRAP A - UNSPIKED 2/24/2010 12:15 RUN 1 TRAP B - SPIKED 2/24/2010 12:15

Run ID Test Date Run Time Summary of Hg Collected on Sorbent Traps via Method 30B

Run ID Appartioned Mass (ng)

Individual Sorbent Tube Emission Summary, Method 30BRUN 1 TRAP A - UNSPIKED 2/25/2010 8:10

RUN 1 TRAP B - SPIKED 2/25/2010 8:10 Averages

Average R Vol. diff (%) RUN 1 TRAP A - UNSPIKED 90.4 2.3 RUN 1 TRAP B - SPIKED 90.4 2.3 RUN 1 TRAP A - UNSPIKED 95.4 0.789 RUN 1 TRAP B - SPIKED 95.4 0.789 RUN 1 TRAP A - UNSPIKED 158 0.197 RUN 1 TRAP B - SPIKED 158 0.197

% Lim it RUN 1 TRAP A - UNSPIKED 1.281663516 RUN 1 TRAP B - SPIKED 0.514905149 RUN 1 TRAP A - UNSPIKED 0.996515679 RUN 1 TRAP B - SPIKED 0.856548857 RUN 1 TRAP A - UNSPIKED 1.321568627 RUN 1 TRAP B - SPIKED 1.152899824

Run ID Sorbent Trap Breakthrough (B)

≤ 10% of Section 1 Hg

ma ss for Hg conc. >1
μ g/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1 μg/dscm Summary of M30B Quality A ssurance Checks
Run ID Volum e Sam pled (dscm)Sample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information 2/25/2010 1,953.43 1000 lb/hr Plant Historian Data 2,789.56 MMBtu/hr CEMS Data Dry N/A

13.30 % Test Run Data 587,000 dscfm Test run data from OTM27/28 sample train 166 deg F Test Run Data

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Me asurement Me thod Other Supporting

Information 2,789.56 MMBtu/hr F-Factor

Total Vapor Phase Me rcury Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA Me thod 30B) Other Supporting

Information 5.18E-07 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL

Total Mass (ng) Section 2 Sections 1+2 (ng) (ug)

0.678 53.578 0 53.578 0.053578 0.38 74.18 20 54.18 0.05418 0.286 28.986 0 28.986 0.028986 0.412 48.512 20 28.512 0.028512 0.337 25.837 0 25.837 0.025837 0.656 57.556 20 37.556 0.037556

Stop per tube per run per tube per run

15:18 0.559 0.5495 0.00158 0.00156 15:18 0.54 0.00153 14:15 0.598 0.5885 0.00167 0.00164 14:15 0.579 0.00161 Run Time Hg Emissions(lb/Tbtu) Hg Emissions (lb/hr) Summary of Hg Collected on Sorbent Traps via Method 30B Initial Spike (ng) Total Non-spike

Individual Sorbent Tube Emission Summary, Method 30B10:10 0.424 0.5185 0.00118 0.00145 10:10 0.613 0.00171 0.552 0.001547931 Based on measured lb/Tbtu and CEMS recorded heat input during testing period

Lim it Abs. diff. % Lim it

C rec R (%) by Run R (%) by

program Lim it

0.653 158 0.189 18.22565092 ≤ 20% of field recovery

test 0.019 1.728844404

Measured Spike Recovery ( R )

0.234 90.4
114.6 Average Recovery

, between 85 and 115% 0.498 95.4 ≥ 10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% RD or ≤ 0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1 μg/dscm 0.019 1.614273577 Summary of M30B Quality A ssurance Checks Paired Trap Agreement (RD)per tube per run 13.88 13.64 13.40 14.60 14.37 14.14 Hg Emissions (lb/y r)*10.36 12.67 14.98 13.55987622 Based on measured lb/Tbtu and CEMS recorded heat input during testing periodEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H2

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Basis (W et/Dry ) Exhaust Steam % Moisture Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2

Emission Test Results Me rcury Species Me rcury Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Hg 0 Hg +2 Hg PSample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Me asurement Me thod Other Supporting

Information

Me rcury Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Me rcury Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Test Method Used

(ex. A STM Method D6784) Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H2

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Basis (W et/Dry ) Exhaust Steam % Moisture Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2

Compound (use drop down to define for as many

rows as needed) Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample

1 (lb/MMBtu) Volatile Organic HA P

Emission Rate Sample

1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Speciated Volatile Organic HA P Emission DataSample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Me asurement Me thod Other Supporting

Information

Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Volatile Organic

HA P Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Volatile Organic

HA P Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2)Test Method Used Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H2

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Basis (W et/Dry ) Exhaust Steam % Moisture Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2

Compound (use drop down to define for as many rows as needed) Semi-Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Semi-Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Am inoazobenzene Speciated Semi Volatile Organic HA P Emission DataSample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Me thod

Semi-Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Semi-Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Semi-Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu)Other Supporting Information

Semi-Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method UsedOther Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H2

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Date of Testing 2/23/2010 2/24/2010 2/25/2010 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) 1,966.04 1,974.46 1,955.46 Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 2,831.56 2,814.21 2,799.48 Basis (W et/Dry ) Dry Dry Dry Exhaust Steam % Moisture 13 13.1 12.6 Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 592,000 595,000 587,000 Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 165 165 165

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 bitum inous 2,831.56 2,814.21 2,799.48

Emission Test Results Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Hydrogen Cyanide

Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Hydrogen Cyanide

Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) [<1.69E-06] [<1.67E-06] [<1.76E-06]Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr Plant Historian Data MMBtu/hr CEMS Data N/A % Method 26A Test Run Data dscfm Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently deg F Method 26A Test Run Data

Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Me asurement Me thod MMBtu/hr F-Factor

Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA

Conditional Test Method 033) Other Supporting Information U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) BDL - Basis for MDL provided as Attachment 1 in ERTMethod 26A Test Run Data Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently Method 26A Test Run Data

Other Supporting Information

BDL - Basis for MDL provided as Attachment 1 in ERTEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H2

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing 2/23/2010 2/24/2010 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) 1,969.18 1,969.36 Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 2,822.70 2,804.83 Basis (W et/Dry ) Dry Dry Exhaust Steam % Moisture 12.9 13.3 Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 592,000 595,000 Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 167 166

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 bitum inous 2,822.70 2,804.83

Emission Test Results Constituent Consitutent Emission Rate Sample 1 (%)
O 2 4.5 CO 2 14.4Sample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information 2/25/2010 1,959.73 1000 lb/hr Plant Historian Data - Taken during Metals Test Runs 2,802.26 MMBtu/hr CEMS Recorded Value - Taken During Metals Test Runs Dry N/A Dry 13.3 % Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently 587,000 dscfm Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently 166 deg F Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Me asurement Method Other Supporting Information 2,802.26 MMBtu/hr F-Factor

Consitutent Emission Rate

Sample 2 (%) Consitutent Emission Rate Sample 3 (%) Test Method Used

(ex. U.S. EPA

Method 3B) Other Supporting Information
4.7 4.9 U.S. EPA Method 3B
14 13.4 U.S. EPA Method 3BPlant Historian Data - Taken during Metals Test Runs CEMS Recorded Value - Taken During Metals Test Runs

Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrentlyEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H2

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing 2/23/2010 2/24/2010 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) 1,966.04 1,974.46 Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 2,831.56 2,814.21 Basis (W et/Dry ) Dry Dry Exhaust Steam % Moisture 13 13.1 Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 592,000 595,000 Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 165 165

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 bitum inous 2,831.56 2,814.21

Emission Test Results Constituent Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) NO 0.32 NO 2Sample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information 2/25/2010 1,955.46 1000 lb/hr Plant Historian Data 2,799.48 MMBtu/hr CEMS Data Dry N/A 12.6 % Acid Gas Test Run Data 587,000 dscfm Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently 165 deg F Acid Gas Test Run Data

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method

2,799.48 MMBtu/hr F-Factor

Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate

Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) 184.17 0.32 182.41Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently

Other Supporting Information

Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate

Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA

Method 7) 0.32 182.70Other Supporting

Information CEMS data used in lieu of actual test data, O2 based on CEMS CO2 dataEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H2

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Basis (W et/Dry ) Exhaust Steam % Moisture Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2

Emission Test Results Constituent Constituent Emission Rate Sample 1 (mg solids/liter) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS)Sample 3 Unit of Measure

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Constituent Emission Rate

Sample 2 (mg solids/liter) Constituent Emission Rate Sample 3 (mg solids/liter)Other Supporting Information

Fuel Flow Measurement Method

Test Method Used (ex. Standard Test Method for Filterable and Nonfilterable Matter in Water A STM D5907)Other Supporting

Information

Other Supporting Information