alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.0**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADDED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE **
**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the                Company                as of and for the period covered by this                Report. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/              Richard              L. Harbaugh                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Richard                L. Harbaugh                                  |
|   | President                and Chief Executive Officer                |
|   | November                13, 2007                                    |
|   |                                                                |
| By:    | /s/              Kim              E. Marco                          |
|   | Kim                E. Marco                                         |
|   | Executive                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | November                13, 2007                                    |

----
cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge McCoy Law Group Boulder City Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09948]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

20 CFR Part 655

Temporary Employment of Foreign Workers in the United States; CFR 
Correction

    In Title 20 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 500 to 656, 
revised as of April 1, 2014, on page 314, in Sec.  655.10, the second 
paragraph (h) and the second paragraph (i) are removed.

[FR Doc. 2015-09948 Filed 4-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-P
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1696 

To require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study of video game console 

energy efficiency. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study of 

video game console energy efficiency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Green Gaming Act 

5 of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. VIDEO GAME CONSOLE ENERGY EFFICIENCY 

7 STUDY. 

8 (a) INITIAL STUDY.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after 

10 the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1696 IS

1 Energy (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Sec2 retary’’) shall conduct a study of— 

3 (A) video game console energy use; and 

4 (B) opportunities for energy savings re5 garding that energy use. 

6 (2) INCLUSIONS.—The study under paragraph 

7 (1) shall include an assessment of all power con8 suming modes and media playback modes. 

9 (b) ACTION ON COMPLETION.—On completion of the 

10 initial study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall de11 termine, by regulation, whether minimum energy effi12 ciency standards for video game console energy use should 

13 be established. 

14 (c) FOLLOW-UP STUDY.—If the Secretary deter15 mines under subsection (b) that standards should not be 

16 established, not later than 3 years after the date of com17 pletion of the determination, the Secretary shall conduct 

18 a follow-up study. 

19 (d) EFFECT OF SECTION.—Nothing in this section 

20 prohibits a State from establishing an energy efficiency 

21 standard for video game console energy use before the 

22 date on which such a standard, if any, is established by 

23 the Secretary pursuant to this section. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 5 

77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD 

CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 

REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF: 

CERTIFIED MAIL 7009 1680 0000 7674 5345 

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

M:r. Scott McDonald 

Project Manager 

Archer Daniels Midland Company 

4666 Faries Parkway 

Decatur, Illinois 62526 

WU-161 

Subject: Request for Information Regarding Archer Daniels Midland (AD.I\1) Financial 

Assurance for the CCS Wells. 

Dear Mr. McDonald: 

Pursuant to 40 CPR 146.82(a) (14), please submit estimates of the costs to perform the activities 

for which financial responsibility must be maintained at the CCS project. Please submit separate 

estimates for a third-party to complete the following activities: 

• Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure, considering the length of the post-injection 

timefrarne, the frequency and type of monitoring that will be performed and the depth, 

diameter, and number of monitoring wells that will need to be plugged. 

• Emergency and Remedial Response, considering how any impacts to the resources 

identified in Appendix H would be addressed. 

Since ADM plans to use a corporate guarantee, we request the following information to support 

an evaluation of this proposed instrument: 

• A signed letter by the CPO of the parent company guaranteeing that the company meets 

the financial coverage criteria in the Class VI Rule at 40 CPR 146.85. 

• A copy of the independently certified report of the company's financial statements 

showing that the company meets the above financial coverage criteria. 

• Financial information (certified by an independent auditor) that provides proof that the 

company meets the five financial ratios described at 40 CPR 146.58(a)(6)(v) 
- 2 -

• Results of a bond rating test, i.e., obtained online through Moody's or S&P, that meet the 

minimum requirements of the bond rating test 

Also, is ADM using self insurance to cover other financial responsibility liabilities (e.g., through 

UIC, CERCLA, and/or RCRA)? 

Additional information about financial responsibility instruments and developing cost estim'ltes, 

including a more complete list of costs to consider, is presented in the Class VI Financial 

Responsibility Guidance available at 

http://water.epa.gov/type/groundwater/uic/class6/gsguidedoc.cfin. Example text for the CPO 

letter and corporate gnarantee, along with a calculation worksheet for the ratios/tests, is provided 

in Appendix B of the guidance. 

Inquiries concerning the contents of this letter may be directed to Dana Rzeznik of my staff by 

telephone at (312) 353-6492 or by email to rzeznik.dana@epa.gov. 

Rebecca Harvey, Chief 

Underground Injection Control Branch 

cc: Mark Buran, ADM, with enclosure 

Stephen Nightingale, IEP A 

Enclosure
Exhibit 11 - Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings


         The net income or loss per share  computations  presented  are based on
the weighted  average  number of common  shares and dilutive  common  equivalent
shares outstanding during each year. Diluted and basic income or loss per common
share are the same amounts for each period.

         In  connection  with the Initial  Public  Offering  (IPO),  155,164 and
300,266  shares of common stock were issued upon the conversion of the Company's
Series C convertible  preferred stock and Series D convertible  preferred stock,
respectively.  An additional 805,209 shares of common stock were issued upon the
conversion  of the  convertible  portion  of the Senior  Subordinated  Notes and
118,167 shares of common stock upon exercise of warrants and options.  The above
shares have been treated as  outstanding  since July 1, 1995.  Stock options and
warrants to purchase an additional 152,851 shares of common stock granted during
1995 have  also been  treated  as  outstanding  since  July 1,  1995,  using the
treasury stock method.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1405 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2010 

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the Longfellow National Historic Site, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Longfellow House-Washington’s Headquarters National Historic Site’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1405 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Longfellow House3 Washington’s Headquarters National Historic Site Des4 ignation Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF LONGFELLOW NATIONAL HIS6 TORIC SITE, MASSACHUSETTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Longfellow National Historic 

8 Site in Cambridge, Massachusetts, shall be known and 

9 designated as ‘‘Longfellow House-Washington’s Head10 quarters National Historic Site’’. 

11 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg12 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

13 States to the Longfellow National Historic Site shall be 

14 considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Longfellow House15 Washington’s Headquarters National Historic Site’’. 

Passed the Senate May 7, 2010. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Opinion filed January 13, 2011

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

Nos. 11-10-00241-CR, 11-10-00242-CR, & 11-10-00243-CR

__________

JAYSON WAYNE GRUMBLES A/K/A JAYSON GRUMBLES, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 266th District Court

Erath County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. CR13391, CR13392, & CR13393

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Jayson Wayne Grumbles pleaded guilty to the offenses of unauthorized use of a vehicle, 

burglary of a building, and harassment by a person in a correctional facility and true to the 

enhancement allegations. In each case, the trial court assessed appellant’s punishment, in 

accordance with the terms of the plea bargain agreement, at confinement for ten years and a 

$1,000 fine with the sentences to run concurrently. We dismiss these appeals.

The trial court certified that these were plea bargain cases in which appellant waived his 

right of appeal and that appellant had no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). 
2

Upon receiving the trial court’s certifications, the clerk of this court wrote appellant’s attorney 

and requested a response showing grounds to continue these appeals. Appellant responded, 

indicating that the trial court’s certifications are defective because appellant had filed pretrial 

motions that are reviewable on appeal. We continued the appeals based upon appellant’s 

response. However, the clerk’s records have now been filed in this court and reveal that the 

certifications are not defective. 

The clerk’s records reflect that appellant entered into a plea bargain agreement in which 

the State agreed to dismiss another case that was pending against appellant and to recommend a 

concurrent ten-year sentence and a $1,000 fine in the three cases at issue in these appeals. In 

exchange, appellant agreed to plead guilty, to waive any pretrial motions that had been asserted, 

and to waive any right to appeal. The records show that the punishment assessed by the trial 

court did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by appellant. 

In each case, the trial court’s certification is supported by the record and is not defective. See 

Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). These certifications reflect that

appellant has no right to appeal. Because appellant’s appeals are prohibited by Rule 25.2, we 

must dismiss them without further action. Rule 25.2(d); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.

PER CURIAM

January 13, 2011

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1622 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1622

  To limit the applicability of a certain judicial ruling to sources 
           regulated under section 202 of the Clean Air Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 6, 2009

 Mr. Barrasso introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To limit the applicability of a certain judicial ruling to sources 
           regulated under section 202 of the Clean Air Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Air Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF STANDARDS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the decision and 
holding of the Supreme Court of the United States in Massachusetts v. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 549 U.S. 497 (2007), and any 
establishment of standards resulting from the proposed rule published 
by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency entitled 
``Proposed Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse 
Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act'' (74 Fed. Reg. 18886 
(April 24, 2009)) or any similar or subsequent proposed or final rule 
or other action relying on that decision or holding, shall apply only 
to sources regulated as of the date of enactment of this Act under 
section 202 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7521).
                                 <all>
```
#### Stephen W. PORTER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Gerald COOK, Warden, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 860647.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Dec. 1, 1987.

*1032Phil Jones, Orem, for plaintiff and appellant.

David L. Wilkinson and Kimberly Hor-nak, Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.

*Memorandum of Decision*

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

A jury found defendant Steven Wayne Porter guilty of aggravated burglary under section 76-6-203 of the Code, burglary under section 76-6-202, and theft under section 76-6-404. He appealed, and this Court affirmed his convictions in *State v. Porter,*705 P.2d 1174, 1179 (Utah 1985). Porter next filed a writ of habeas corpus. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied Porter’s request for relief. This is an appeal from that ruling.

Before this Court, Porter essentially repeats the arguments made below. He contends on a number . of grounds that throughout his defense, he has been denied effective assistance of counsel. The trial court rejected these contentions after the evidentiary hearing, ruling that defense counsel’s representation met constitutional standards. This conclusion was supported by a detailed memorandum of decision and findings and conclusions. We are not persuaded that the trial court erred.

Porter also argues that certain rulings made in the course of his original trial were erroneous. These arguments should have been addressed in his direct appeal. We will not consider them now. *See, e.g., Codianna v. Morris,*660 P.2d 1101, 1104 (Utah 1983); *State v. Boggess,*601 P.2d 927, 929 (Utah 1979).

Affirmed.

HALL, C.J., STEWART, Associate C.J., and HOWE and DURHAM, JJ., concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.78 MB)

Tags:Air Forces Central Command, 455th Expeditionary Logistics Readiness Squadron, U.S. AFCENT, U.S. Air Force, pilot, aircraft, 455th Air Expeditionary Wing, Bagram Airfield, Bagram, team, Air Force, Afghanistan, usaf, airmen, vehicle maintenance, aerial port, vehicles, fuels, fuels, contractors, aircrew, Operation Freedom’s Sentinel, supply, contingency operations, passenger terminal, NATO Resolute Support, transportation management

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS ~

PricewaterhouseCoopers **LLP
1177 Avenue of the Americas

New York NY 10036

Telephone (646) 471 4000 

Facsimile (813) 286 6000
**Report ofIndependentAccountants
 

 

 

To the Board of Directors andShareholder of

GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion, dated March 17, 2003, about GMAC 

Commercial Mortgage Corporation's compliance with its established minimum master 

servicing standards ("Master Servicing Policy"), which were derived from the Mortgage 

Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage 
Bankers (USAP), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 included in the 

accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for the company's 

compliance with the Master Servicing Policy. Our responsibility is to express an 

opinion on management's assertion about the company's compliance based on our 

examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with the standards established by the

 American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included 

examining, on a test basis, evidence about the company's compliance with the Master 

Servicing Policy and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in 

the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our 

opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination of the company's 

compliance with the Master Servicing Policy.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the company complied with the 

aforementioned Master Servicing Policy as of and for the year ended December 31, 

2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 
***PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP*
March 17, 2003******
Order entered April 10 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 01430
- CR No. 05
- 12
- 01603
- CR
NAKIA LASHUAN FRANKL IN, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 416
- 81048
- 20 08 , 416
- 81072
- 2012 

### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeals. On March 6, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: ( 1) appellant desire to pursue the appeals; (2) appellant was represented by retained counsel at trial, but did not retain counsel for the appeals; (3) appellant is indigent; (4) Angela D’Amore has now been appointed to represent appellant; and (5) Ms. D’Am ore should be given forty

- five days to file appellant’s brief.
We DIRECT the Clerk to substitute Angela D’Amore as appellant’s appointed attorney of record in place of Matthew Rolston.We ORDER appellant to file his brief within FORTY
- FIVE DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Matthew Rolston, Angela D’Amore, and John Rolater.

/s/ DAVI D EVANS JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12902-12903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5041]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Reporting Requirements Submitted for OMB Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the public that the 
agency has made such a submission.

DATES: Submit comments on or before April 2, 2012. If you intend to 
comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB 
Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline.
    Copies: Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and 
other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the 
Agency Clearance Officer.

ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this notice to: Agency 
Clearance Officer, Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 
3rd Street, SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and OMB Reviewer, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget, New

[[Page 12903]]

Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance 
Officer, (202) 205-7044.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title: ``8(a) Annual Update''.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    SBA Form Number: 1450.
    Description of Respondents: Firms that are currently certified as 
Participant firms in the 8(a) Business Development program and are 
owned by one of the following entities: Tribe, Alaska Native 
Corporation (ANC), Native Hawaiian Organization (NHO), or Community 
Development Corporation (CDC).
    Responses: 360.
    Annual Burden: 540.

Curtis Rich,
Acting Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 2012-5041 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P