alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, James P. Cox, certifythat:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof PQ Corporation;

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
| Date: August 14,  2006 |                                             |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                   | /s/ James P. Cox                            |
|                   | James P. Cox                                |
|                   | Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 315/2006

of 22 February 2006         

implementing Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) as regards the list of target secondary variables relating to housing conditions

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 June 2003 concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) (1), and in particular Article 15(2)(f) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The list of target secondary variables, the variable codes, and the definitions for the 2007 module on housing conditions to be included in the cross-sectional component of Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) shall be as laid down in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 February 2006.

For the Commission

Joaquín ALMUNIA            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 165, 3.7.2003, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1553/2005 (OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p. 6).

----

ANNEX

For the purposes of this Regulation, the following units, modes of data collection, reference periods and definitions shall apply.

1.   Units

The target variables relate to two types of units:

2.   Modes of data collection

For all target variables the mode of data collection is personal interview with the household respondent or register.

3.   Reference periods

The target variables relate to three types of reference periods:

4.   Definitions

1.   Shortage of space in dwelling

2.   Dwelling installations and facilities

3.   Accessibility of basic needs

4.   Overall satisfaction with dwelling

5.   Change of dwelling

5.   Transmission of data to Eurostat

The target secondary variables on ‘housing conditions’ will be sent to Eurostat in the household data file (H) after the target primary variables.

AREAS AND LIST OF TARGET VARIABLES

Module 2007 Housing Conditions

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Jerry Silva, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chem Rx Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Registrant");

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



---



5.     The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Dated
November 14, 2007

| | /s/JERRY SILVAJerry Silva
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WestCoast Golf Experiences, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  January 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Roger Arnet,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this  certification as of the
14th day of March, 2006.

/s/ Roger Arnet
-------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1







SHAMIKA 2 GOLD, INC.
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Shamika 2 Gold, Inc.. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Vivian, President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: May 17, 2011
/s/ Robert VivianName:  Robert VivianTitle:  President and Chief Executive Officer and Interim Financial Officer(Principal Executive and  Accounting Officer)
GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation
550 California Street, 14th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel. 415-835-9200
Fax: 415-391-2949



GMAC Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.
Series 1999-C1
Annual Statement as to Compliance
For Period of February 1 through December 31, 1999

Pursuant to section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, I attest that:


(i.)      A review of the  activities  of GMAC  Commercial  Mortgage  as Special
          Servicer  during  the  period,  and  of  its  performance  under  this
          Agreement, has been made under my supervision.


(ii.)     To the best of my  knowledge,  based on such review,  GMAC  Commercial
          Mortgage as Special  Servicer,  has fulfilled in all material respects
          its obligations under this Agreement  throughout the period.  However,
          during  the period of  February  1 through  December  31,  1999,  GMAC
          Commercial  Mortgage as Special Servicer did not service any Specially
          Serviced Mortgaged Loans.


(ii)      GMAC  Commercial  Mortgage as Special  Servicer has received no notice
          regarding qualifications, or challenging the status, of the Trust Fund
          as a REMIC or of the  Grantor  Trust as a  "grantor  trust"  under the
          Grantor  Trust  Provisions  from the Internal  Revenue  Service or any
          other governmental agency or body.

BY:
     Michele Heisler
     Vice President, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation

Date:
     3/8/00
#### Jonathan A. GILLESPIE, Appellant, v. Gloria L. CLAY, Appellee.

No. 64781.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 24, 1986.

Rehearing Granted for Limited Purpose and Opinion Amended June 24, 1986.

Robert H. Warren, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

John Sopher, Oklahoma City, for appel-lee.

OPINION BY ORDER

Upon review of the record in this cause and after consideration of the arguments and authorities presented by the parties, we find appellee failed to exercise due diligence to ascertain the whereabouts of appellant, the record owner of a certain parcel of real property for which appellee applied for a Certificate Tax Deed. Notice given in conjunction with appellee’s application was had by publication and fails for want of due diligence as that term is defined in *Bomford v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.,*440 P.2d 713 (Okl.1968). See also: *Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Co.,*339 U.S. 306, 70 S.Ct. 652, 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950).

Specifically, appellee had knowledge of the name and address of the attorney who administered the estate by which appellant acquired title to the property in question, and which attorney subsequently entered an appearance on behalf of appellant in a civil action brought against appellant in the District Court of Oklahoma County, the county in which the property is located. Given these facts, a reasonable person should have deduced said attorney was a source to be inquired of in any meaningful effort to learn appellant’s whereabouts. Failure to do so renders the publication notice void and the subsequent tax deed proceedings were therefore done in violation of appellant’s right of due process.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that the judgment of the trial court is REVERSED in accordance with the rule of the Supreme Court governing accelerated disposition of appeals, dated November 7, 1985, 56 OBJ 2773.

DOOLIN, V.C.J., and LAVENDER, HARGRAVE, OPALA, WILSON, KAU-GER and SUMMERS, JJ., concur.

*264SIMMS, C.J., concurs in part, dissents in part.

HODGES, J., dissents.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Donald J. Stephens, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 ofWauwatosa Holdings, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the
-46-

 
   registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: July 31, 2006     /s/ Donald J. Stephens Donald J. Stephens  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer  
-47-
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

mtniteb ~tates QCourt of §ppeaIs

for tbe jfeberaI QCircuit

KENNETH SWINGER,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,

Respondent.

2012-3213

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection

Board in case no. AT0752110607-I-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Kenneth Swinger moves for leave to proceed in forma

paupens.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

Case: 12-3213 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 10/19/2012
KENNETH SWINGER v. ARMY

s24

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

2

Case: 12-3213 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 10/19/2012
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsCommentaries     Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians
        
            Commentaries
 Keyword
 Type Select a CategoryTop StoriesMission/TrainingFeaturesSecretary of the AFAF Chief of StaffChief Master Sgt. of the AFCommentariesSequestration NewsSpace/TechnologyHumanitarianAFSO 21Women's History Month 1-15EnvironmentalWarrior CareDiversityDignified TransferSafetyHeritageAir Force FamilyPersonnel MattersCommander's Call TopicsHaiti Earthquake ReliefDon't Ask Don't TellSuicide PreventionWarrior GamesEnergyAircraftEtchbergerSexual AssaultOperation TomodachiOperation Odyssey Dawn2011 Appropriations InformationHurricane Irene9/11AFAWeek in PhotosThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their Words2012 Appropriations InformationAfrican American History MonthAfrican American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29Fiscal Year BudgetAir Force StoriesColorado WildfireChief of Staff ArchiveHurricane IsaacAFA 2012APP RSSAPP Airman VisualsExpeditionary OperationsHurricane SandyTransition GPSAir Force in SpaceSports/RecreationH1N1Women's History Month 16-30Oklahoma Tornado ReliefMemorial DayCOVID-19 CommentariesCOVID-19
 RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 Jan. 8, 2022What is 'purpose?'
        In a recent study, 57% of younger Americans said when developing their career priorities, the most important is to do work that is enjoyable and meaningful, as this is what keeps them most engaged.  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 563 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 563

  Expressing the sense of the Senate that the President should pursue 
   extradition authority for international cybercriminals committing 
          credit card theft targeting United States citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2014

   Mr. Kirk (for himself, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Coats, Mr. Isakson, Mr. 
 Chambliss, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Thune, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Johnson 
  of Wisconsin, Mr. Cornyn, and Mr. Grassley) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Senate that the President should pursue 
   extradition authority for international cybercriminals committing 
          credit card theft targeting United States citizens.

Whereas the number of United States citizens who have had their identity and 
        financial information compromised as a result of recent data breaches at 
        major retailers exceeds 100,000,000;
Whereas the financial security of middle class Americans has been put at risk by 
        these criminal attacks;
Whereas cybercrimes targeting the financial information of United States 
        citizens are often transnational crimes; and
Whereas the United States does not currently have established extradition 
        agreements with many countries acting as safe havens for cybercriminals: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the President 
should immediately launch international negotiations with the 
governments of the world's leading powers for new, effective 
extradition treaties with countries with which the United States has no 
current extradition authority, as well as renegotiate old, ineffective 
treaties, in order to combat more effectively international 
cybercriminals, including those who target the credit card information 
of United States citizens.
                                 <all>
```
October 2, 2015

Mr. Sean Cope

465 Coloma Street Unit D

Sausalito, CA 94965

Dear Mr. Cope:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your July 15, 2015, exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2772, but 

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4