alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Unassociated Document


    “Health
      Assistance” Designated Medicine Supply Contract

     

    Party
      A: Chinese Red Cross Health Assistance Office

    Party
      B: Harbin OT Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

    


    To
      advocate the spirit of “humanity, philanthropy and dedication”, further expand
      the influence of Red Cross and improve public health, “Health Assistance” Office
      will use all of gynecological medicine (including Shehuang Suppository) of
      OT
      series produced by Party B as designated medicine in “Health Assistance——Red
      Cross Actions”. The two parties enter into the following
      agreements:

    


    1.
      Having
      ascertained by Party A and examined by special review board, all gynecological
      medicine (including Shehuang Suppository) of OT series produced by Party B
      shall
      be the designated medicines in “Health Assistance——Red Cross
      Actions.

    


    2.
      Party
      B should ensure to provide designated medicines for “Health Assistance Station”
in “Health Assistance——Red Cross Actions” while performing other sales
      contract.

    


    3.
      Party
      B shall provide medicines to “Health Assistance Station” in accordance with
      Party A’s written notice. Party B shall deliver medicine to “Health Assistance
      Station” within three working days after receiving the notice.

    


    4.
      Settlement of accounts: The two parties shall check the total amount of medicine
      provided in 2005 before Dec.12th 2005. Party A will pay Party B after the
      Chinese government allocates sufficient grants to Health Assistance
      Office.

    


    5.
      Party
      B shall ensure to provide medicine with good quality.

    


    6.
      The
      term of the contract is temporarily designated as two years.

     

    7.
      This
      contract has one version and four copies, each party possessing two
      copies.

    


    Party
      A:
      /s/ Chinese Red Cross Health Assistance Office

    Oct.22nd,
      2004

    


    Party
      B:
      /s/ Harbin OT Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

    Oct.22nd,
      2004
Exhibit 10.2


REDD Engagement Letter


[BETTER BIODIESEL
LOGO]

1400 West 400 North

Ph: (801) 990-2810

Fax: (801) 225-8635

www.betterbiodiesel.com

E-mail: info@betterbiodiesel.com


November 15, 2006


Mr. Lowry Redd, PE

President

REDD Engineering & Construction, Inc.

1600 West 2200 South, Suite 107

Salt Lake City, Utah 84119


Dear Mr. Redd,


This Engagement
Letter (the “Letter”) confirms the understanding by which Better Biodiesel,
Inc. (“BBD”) has engaged REDD Engineering & Construction, Inc. (“REDD”),
and REDD has agreed to be engaged by BBD, to perform the engineering and
consulting services (the “Services”) reflected in REDD’s October 5, 2006 letter
to BBD, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Hereinafter, REDD and BBD shall be
collectively referred to as the “Parties”.


As evidenced by my
email to you confirming the Notice to Proceed and subsequently, the check for
Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) which BBD sent REDD last month as a
retainer for the Services, BBD desires to move forward with the relationship.
As discussed and agreed, the Parties expect to work together to prepare
additional formalized agreements for each major addition or change to this work
scope in order to facilitate the various phases of program development,
including, but not limited to: Study, Design / Engineering, Permitting,
Procurement / Fabrication, Construction / Commissioning / Startup, Operations
and Maintenance, and Process and Facility Upgrade.


Also enclosed
hereto as Exhibit B is the budget cost estimate sheet prepared by REDD,
representing the current estimate of capital costs for a standard package, 10
million gallons per year (“gpy”) module of the process and components as
invented by BBD.


The Parties
acknowledge their mutual intent to work together to timely perform the tasks to
be outlined in the various project correspondence and plans, including timely
payment of all obligations by BBD, in order to meet BBD targets for scope,
schedule and budget.


This Letter may be
executed by facsimile and in one or more counterparts, all of which taken
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties have each
executed and delivered this Letter as of the day and year first above written.


	
  REDD ENGINEERING &
  CONSTRUCTION, INC.

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ Lowry Redd

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  Lowry Redd, PE

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  President

  	
   

  



 









 



 


	
  BETTER BIODIESEL, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Ron Crafts

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  Ron Crafts

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Cc:

  	
  F. Briton McConkie

  
	
   

  	
  Peter Kristensen

  
	
   

  	
  David Otto

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Encl: 

  	
  October 5, 2006
  letter from Lowry Redd to Ron Crafts (Exhibit A)

  
	
   

  	
  REDD Standard
  Terms & Conditions and Billing Rate Schedule (Exhibit A)

  
	
   

  	
  Budget Cost
  Estimate Sheet (Exhibit B)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,     Respondent     v.   ENRIQUE JIMINEZ,     Petitioner 

No. 209 EAL 2015   Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1632 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1632

  To require full and complete public disclosure of the terms of home 
                 mortgages held by Members of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 6, 2009

Mrs. Boxer (for herself and Mr. Isakson) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require full and complete public disclosure of the terms of home 
                 mortgages held by Members of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIRING MORTGAGE DISCLOSURE.

    Section 102(a)(4)(A) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 
U.S.C. App) is amended by inserting after ``spouse'' the following: ``, 
except that this exception shall not apply to a reporting individual 
described in section 101(f)(9)''.
                                 <all>
```
### u.s. Department of

Transportation Office of the Secretary Of Transportation

April 29; 2014 Ms. JoAnn Wolters Gem Air LLC 31 Hamner Drive Salmon, ID 83467 Dear Ms. Wolters: t.,uY')O DO'. 

### 10 .•.. 1. 1.<]' ~; I :;.. 0 '200 New Jersey Ave .• S.E. Washington. DC 20590

I couldn't find the corrected resume forDan Schroederinthe documentthat you sent on April 18,2014. Please send the resume with correcteddatesthathe served as Director of Operations and Chief Pilot for Gem Air. I also need account information fromthe CapitalOne 360accounton company/bank letterhead. The Department does not accept online statementsto verify accountinformation. Additionally, what is the core business ofW&S EnterprisesLLC andwhat is their relationship with Gem Air? Will the financial forecast you provided fortheproposedcommuteroperations remain applicable for any l2-month period? Please respond fully to this request within 30 days of the date of this letter. You may upload your response via the web at www.regulations.gov or you may mail your response to u.S
.

. Departnient of Transportation Dockets, West Building, Ground Floor, W12-l40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, D.C. 20590. In either case, yourresponse should be filed in Docket DOT-OST-2014-0020. Please include a statement signed by a representativeofthe air carrier [who shall be a principal owner, senior officer, or internal counsel of the carrier] indicating that, pursuant to Title 18
. United States Code Section 1001,the informationprovided in response to this letter is true and correct and that the aforementioned individual has not kDowingly and willingly falsified, concealed or failed to disclose any material fact or made any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement in connection with the preparationorfiling ofthe material submitted.Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Ifyou have any questions regarding this letter or

the requested information, please contact me at (202) 366-9721' or via email at Barbara.Snoden@dot.gov. Sincerely,

Barbara Snoden Transportation Analyst. Air Carrier Fitness Division Office ofAviation Analysis

cc: Docket DOT-OST-20l4-0020 Mr. Patrick Darling POI for Gem Air LLC FAA Boise FSDO 3295 Elder St., Suite 350 Boise, ID 833705

2
Exhibit 32.1

NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008 (the Report), I, James S. Quarforth, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ James S. QuarforthJames S. QuarforthChief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors


August 8, 2008
#### .'Carr et al., Appellees, *v.*The Cleveland Trust Co.,  ?

(No. 31029

Decided June 4, 1947.)

*Mr. Lex Kintner,*for appellees.

*Messrs. Todd & .Todd,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged, *-sua sponte,*that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 24.7**
**POWER OF ATTORNEY**
     KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appointLionel Reilly, or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in myname and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONALVETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004, and any suchamendment thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(“SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to file any suchamendment to the Form 10-K, exhibits thereto and documents required inconnection therewith with the SEC, and generally to do and perform all thingsnecessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respectsas I could do if personally present.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 28 day of October,2004.     /s/ Tom Latta DVM     Tom Latta     STATE OF TEXAS )   ) ss.COUNTY OF HANSFORD )  
     On this       day of October, 2004, before me, a Notary Public qualified forsaid County, personally came Tom Latta, known to me to be the identical personwho signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the execution thereof tobe his voluntary act and deed.     /s/ Cynthia Copp     Notary PublicMy commission expires: 7-30-08
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of NewPage Holding Corporation and NewPage Corporation (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David J. Prystash, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of
the Companies.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ David J. Prystash  
|David J. Prystash      
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 10, 2009
Letter Amendment to Employment Agreement - Bruce R. Wright



 Exhibit 10.3 

Ultratech, Inc. 

3050 Zanker Road 

San Jose, California 95134 

April 19, 2010 

Mr. Bruce R. Wright 
 c/o Ultratech,
Inc. 
 3050 Zanker Road 
 San Jose,
California 95134 
 Dear Bruce: 
 We
would like to take this opportunity to clarify certain provisions in your Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Ultratech, Inc. (the “Company”), that became effective as of January 1, 2009 (the “Employment
Agreement”). 
 Release Requirement. Under your Employment Agreement, you are required to execute and deliver a general
release to the Company as a condition to your qualifying for certain severance benefits. We wish to resolve any potential ambiguity as to the impact that release will have upon the commencement date of the payment of any such severance benefits to
which you may become entitled under your Employment Agreement, whether payable in cash or equity, should the delayed commencement date provisions of Section 10.1 of your Employment Agreement not otherwise be applicable at that time. As a point
of clarification, in that event each of the references in your Employment Agreement to “any applicable revocation period” is intended to refer to the maximum applicable review/delivery and revocation period to which you are entitled under
applicable law with respect to the release. That maximum period will accordingly be used to determine the date (and taxable year) for the commencement of such severance benefits. 

Except for the clarifications set forth in this letter, all the terms and provisions of your Employment Agreement will continue in full force and effect.

  

	
	 /s/ Henri Richard

	 Henri Richard

	 Chairman, Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors



APPROVAL 
 I hereby
approve and accept the clarifying changes to my Employment Agreement set forth above. 
  

	
	 /s/ Bruce R. Wright

	 Bruce R. Wright



Dated: April 19, 2010 
  

 1
<PAGE>

           Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Statement of Additional Information
and the incorporation by reference therein and to the use of our report dated
February 27, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of IDS
Life Insurance Company (name subsequently changed to RiverSource Life
Insurance Company) and to the use of our report dated March 31, 2006 with
respect to the financial statements of American Enterprise Variable Annuity
Account (name subsequently changed to RiverSource Variable Annuity Account) in
the Initial Registration Statement on Form N-4 for the registration of the
Wells Fargo Advantage(R) Builder Select Variable Annuity offered by
RiverSource Life Insurance Company.

                                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                               ------------------------------
                                                   Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 2, 2007
Exhibit
32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Waterstone Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard C. Larson, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Richard C.
Larson


Richard
C. Larson


Chief
Financial Officer


May 8,
2009






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Waterstone Financial, Inc. and will be
retained by Waterstone Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification**

I, Bennie H. Duck,certify that:

1.               I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-K of First Investors Financial Services Group, Inc.

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.               The Company’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theCompany and based on such evaluation:

a)        Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b)       Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport (based on such evaluation); and

c)        Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)        Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)       Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: July 27, 2006 |                     |
|---------------------|--------------------------|
|                |                     |
|                | By: /s/ BENNIE  H. DUCK  |   |
|                | Bennie H. Duck           |
|                | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
Sona,

I don’t recall exactly, but I have seen various distances and have seen feed quite a distance from the cows... Three feet is not that much so, 

I’m sure that in many instances it has been greater than 3 feet. 

Sheraz Gill

Supervising Air Quality Engineer

San Joaquin Valley APCD

Phone: (559) 230-5908

Fax: (559) 230-6061

sheraz.gill@valleyair.org

From: Chilingaryan.Sona@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Chilingaryan.Sona@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 10:48 AM 

To: Ramon Norman; Sheraz Gill 

Cc: Levin.Nancy@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: distance of feed from cows at dairies 

 

Hi Ramon and Sheraz, 

At the dairies that I've been to in the past, I've seen feed be more than three feet away from a feed lane fence. You have 

been to far more dairies than I have-- can you please confirm whether you've seen the same? 

Thanks much, 

s. 

Sona Chilingaryan 

Agriculture Program 

U.S. EPA Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street (Air-6) 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-972-3368 

Fax: 415-947-3579

RE: distance of feed from cows at dairies 

Sheraz Gill 

to: 

Sona Chilingaryan, Ramon Norman 

12/05/2011 11:12 AM 

Cc: 

Nancy Levin 

Hide Details 

From: "Sheraz Gill" <Sheraz.Gill@valleyair.org>

To: Sona Chilingaryan/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, "Ramon Norman" <Ramon.Norman@valleyair.org>

Cc: Nancy Levin/R9/USEPA/US@EPA 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\nlevin\Local Settings\Temp\notesBAAA25\~web1335.htm 12/22/2011