### 68135 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2013 / Notices

rights made available to European Union carriers in the future.

Barbara J. Hairston, Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2013–27103 Filed 11–12–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**[Summary Notice No. PE–2013–39]**

**Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of petition for exemption received.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to improve the public’s awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition.

**DATES :**  Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket number and must be received on or before December 3, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA– 2013–0710 using any of the following methods:

• Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically.

• Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590.

• Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at 202–493–2251.

• Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the Docket Management Facility in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Privacy: We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. Using the search function of our docket Web site, anyone can find and read the comments received into any of our dockets, including the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78).

Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to the Docket Management Facility in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Keira Jones (202) 267–4024, Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591.

This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

Issued in Washington, DC, on November 4,
2013. Brenda D. Courtney, Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking. Petition For Exemption

Docket No.: FAA–2013–0710. Petitioner: Atlas Air, Inc. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR § 121.1005.

Description of Relief Sought: Atlas Air seeks relief to have the ability to provide training on any pre-transportation functions related to handling hazmat (including but not limited to acceptance, rejection, handling, storage incidental to transport, packaging, or loading, or any function listed under § 121.1001(a)) for individuals used by Atlas and received hazmat training from a foreign air carrier issued operations specifications under 14 CFR part 129. Atlas has determined this training issubstantially similar to Atlas’s FAAapproved training and satisfies international hazardous materials training standards provided by Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) or the International Civil Aviation Organization’s Technical Instructions (ICAO TI), and all other 14 CFR requirements.

[FR Doc. 2013–27032 Filed 11–12–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Highway Administration**

**Environmental Impact Statement: Los Angeles County, California** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. **ACTION :**  Notice of Intent.

**SUMMARY :**  The FHWA, on behalf of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), is issuing this notice to advise the public that an Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared for a proposed highway project in Los Angeles County, California.

**DATES :**  Public Scoping meetings will be held in early part of 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Tami Podesta, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 100 S. Main Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, telephone (213) 897–0309 and tami

_ podesta@dot.ca.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Effective July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) assigned, and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) assumed, environmental responsibilities fOr this project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. Caltrans as the assigned National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) agency will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement on a proposal for State Route 138 (SR–138) Northwest Corridor Improvement project in Los Angeles County, California. This project is located in northern Los Angeles County, three miles south of the Kern County Line and passing within one-half mile of the northernmost limits of the City of Lancaster. The project extends from Interstate 5 (1–5) on the west to State Route 14 (SR–14) on the east, a distance of approximately 36 miles. It is currently a two-lane rural highway with no access control. SR–138 Northwest Corridor Improvement Project proposes to improve the highway as a freeway, expressway with access control and/or traffic system/multi-modal facility. The SR–138 currently supports the regional transportation needs of the local community, and serves as an alternate route for east-west traffic in northern Los Angeles County.

Four alternatives are identified for the project corridor. Alternative 1 is an expressway facility throughout the entire corridor. Alternative 2 is a freeway/expressway facility throughout the entire corridor. Alternative 3 is a traffic system/multi-modal facility throughout the entire corridor. Alternative 4 is the No-Build Alternative.

These alternatives may be refined, combined with various different alternatives, or be removed from further consideration, as more analysis is conducted on the project alternatives. Analysis supporting the EIS will determine the type of facility necessary to meet the existing and future