alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Tronox
      Incorporated


123
      Robert S. Kerr Avenue


Oklahoma
      City, OK 73102








**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**REGARDING
      PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**








I,
      Mary
      Mikkelson the Chief Financial Officer of Tronox Incorporated, in compliance
      with
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, hereby certify in connection with the registrant’s report on Form
      10-Q for the period that ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”) that:





·
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





·
            information
                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the
                financial condition and results of operations of the
                Issuer.











/s/
      Mary
      Mikkelson


__________________________





Mary
      Mikkelson


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      14, 2006
[Cite as Martin v. Woods, 121 Ohio St.3d 609, 2009-Ohio-1928.]

M ARTIN , A PPELLANT , v. W OODS ET AL ., A PPELLEES . [Cite as Martin v. Woods, 121 Ohio St.3d 609, 2009-Ohio-1928.] Appeal from dismissal of complaint for writ of mandamus — Application of R.C. 2731.04 and 2969.21 to 2969.27 — Judgment affirmed. (No. 2009-0226

─ Submitted April 21, 2009

─ Decided April 30, 2009.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9-08-56.

__________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint of appellant, Robe rt Martin, for a writ of mandamus. Martin did not bring this action in the name of the state and failed to seek leave to amend his complaint to comply with this R.C. 2731.04 requirement when appellees raised it. Rust v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections , 108 Ohio St.3d 139, 2005-Ohio-5795, 841 N.E.2d 766, ¶ 16. Martin also did not comply with the requirements of R.C. 2969.21 to 2969.27. See, e.g., State ex rel. Ridenour v. Brunsman , 117 Ohio St.3d 260, 2008-Ohio-854, 883 N.E.2d 438, ¶ 5. Notwithstanding Martin’s contention to the contrary, R.C. 2969.21 to 2969.27 apply to civil actions that an inmate commences against the state, a political subdivision, or an employee of those entities in the court of appeals. R.C. 2969.21(B)(1)(a). {¶ 2} We further deny appellant’s motion to strike appellees’ merit brief. Judgment affirmed.
M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

__________________ Robert Martin, pro se.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Ashley Dawn Rutherford, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

______________________
1

OFFICE OF 

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND 

POLLUTION PREVENTION

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON D.C., 20460 

 PC Code: 101701 

 DP Barcode: 396719, 396720, 398267, 418144 

 Date: October 13, 2015 

MEMORANDUM 

Subject: Propyzamide: Data Evaluation Record for an Environmental Chemistry Methods 

in Soil and Water and the Corresponding Independent Laboratory Validation 

(MRIDs 48599205, 48599206, 48599207, 48690302, 49800801 and 498005802). 

TO: Wilhelmena Livingston, Chemical Review Manager 

Cathryn Britton, Team Leader 

Kevin Costello, Branch Chief 

Risk Management and Implementation Branch 4 

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P) 

FROM: Karen Milians, Ph.D., Chemist 

ERB IV/EFED (7507P) 

APPROVED Jean Holmes, D.V.M., MPH, Branch Chief

BY: ERB IV / EFED (7507P) 

The Environmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED) has reviewed the data submitted DOW 

Agrosciences for the herbicide propyzamide (also known as pronamide). 

The results of the reviews are described in the attached Data Evaluation Records (DERs). Some 

studies were classified as invalid because of deficiencies in the ECM/ILV (e.g. insufficient 

performance data reported, not meeting OCSPP guideline 850.6100 criteria for precision and 

accuracy, etc.). The attached DERs provide complete details about the studies. The environmental 

chemistry methods in soil and water along with their corresponding ILVs will be needed to address 

uncertainties in the data submitted. 

MRIDs Guideline Number/Title Classification Comments 

48599205 OCSPP 835.6100, Environmental 

Chemistry Method in Soil 

Invalid The study cannot be 

used for risk assessment 

purposes 

48599206 OCSPP 835.6100, Independent 

Laboratory Validation in Soil 

Invalid The study cannot be 

used for risk assessment 

purposes 
2

48599207 OCSPP 835.6100, Environmental 

Chemistry Method in Water 

Supplemental This study can be used 

for characterization 

purposes. 

48690302 OCSPP 835.6100, Independent 

Laboratory Validation in Water 

Supplemental This study can be used 

for characterization 

purposes. 

49800801 OCSPP 835.6100, Environmental 

Chemistry Method in Soil 

Supplemental This study can be used 

for characterization 

purposes. 

49800802 OCSPP 835.6100, Independent 

Laboratory Validation in Soil 

Supplemental This study can be used 

for characterization 

purposes.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.47 MB)

Tags:People and Culture, DLA Troop Support, Civilian Retirement

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 32 .01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Microelectronics Technology Company (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"),

I, Brian Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial  condition  and result of  operations of
the Company.

           /s/ Brian Stewart
	     Brian Stewart
      Chief Executive Officer

December 11, 2009














EXHIBIT 32 .02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Microelectronics Technology Company., (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"),

I, Michael Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial  condition  and result of  operations of
the Company.

   /s/ Michael Lee
      Michael Lee
  Chief Financial Officer

December 11, 2009










2
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ TMI PRODUCTS INC, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. ROSEN ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEMS LP, Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________ 2014

- 1553

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 5:12

- cv - 02263

- RGK

SP, Judge R. Gary Klausner.

--------------------------------------------------------------------- TMI PRODUCTS INC, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. ROSEN ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEMS LP, Defendant

- Appellant.

______________________ 2014

- 1585

______________________ Case: 14-1553 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 11/06/2014TMI PRODUCTS INC v. ROSEN ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEMS 2
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 5:12

- cv - 02263

- RGK

SP, Judge R. Gary Klausner.

______________________ ON MOTION

______________________ O R D E R Rosen Electronics, L.P. moves without opposition to voluntarily dismiss its cross

- appeal, No. 2014

- 1585, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). Upon consideration thereof, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted. Appeal No. 2014

- 1585 is dismissed. (2) The revised official caption is reflected above. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in Appeal No. 2014

- 1585

.
F OR THE C OURT /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (a s to 2014

- 1585 only ): November 6, 2014

s30 Case: 14-1553 Document: 50 Page: 2 Filed: 11/06/2014
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7247

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. TAKI MICARIO WASHINGTON, a/k/a Joey Williams,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:00-cr-00318-GBL-1)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Taki Micario Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Colin Christopher Sampson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Taki Micario Washington appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Washington , No. 1:00-cr-00318-GBL-1 (E.D. Va. filed June 17,
2009; entered June 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1




PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN




(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009)




First Amendment




Pride International, Inc. (the “Company”), having previously established the Pride
International, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009
(the “Plan”), and having reserved the right under Section 19 thereof to amend the Plan, does hereby
amend the Plan, effective as of January 1, 2010, to make certain design changes in accordance with
final regulations promulgated under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
on November 17, 2009, as follows:



1. Section 8 of the Plan is hereby amended by (a) deleting the word “and” at the end of item
(vi), (b) replacing the period at the end of item (vii) with “; and” and (c) adding the following
new item (viii) to the end thereof to read as follows:




“(viii) the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by a
Participant during any Purchase Period shall not exceed 5,000 shares.”




2. The last sentence of Section 9 of the Plan is hereby deleted.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Lonnie D. Bane
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Lonnie D. Bane 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President, Human Resources and 

Administration 	 
	 
	ATTEST:
	 
	/s/ Brady K. Long
GMAC

Commercial Mortgage

 

Servicing Officer Certificate

For the Year Ended December 31, 2001

GMAC Commercial Securites

Series 2001-C2

Pursuant to GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation Servicing standards, I hereby

attest that:

A review of the activities of GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation as Servicer

during the period, and of its compliance with procedures has been made under my

Supervision.

To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, GMAC Commercial Mortgage

Corporation as Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations throughout the period.

GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation, as Master Servicer, has received no

notice regarding qualifications, or challenging the status, of the Trust Fund as a 

REMIC from the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or

body.

GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION

Brian T. Stauffer

By:	Brian T. Stauffer

Title:	Senior Vice President

Date:	March 29, 2002

 

 

 

 

 

.569

A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200 Witmer Road   *   P.O. Box 1015   *   Horsham, PA 19044-8015
#### Albert Wesley BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-84-94.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Oct. 28, 1987.

Order Recalling Mandate, Allowing Petition for Rehearing and Withdrawing Opinion from Publication.

BRETT, Presiding Judge:

On August 31, 1987, this Court entered an opinion, 742 P.2d 588, in the above styled and numbered appeal. On September 30,1987, the mandate was issued. Appellant has filed a Petition for Rehearing which the Court considers and waives this Court’s Rule requiring the filing of a Petition for Rehearing within twenty days from the date the opinion is filed. After considering the Petition for Rehearing, this Court finds that the petition should be granted, the mandate should be withdrawn and the opinion should be withdrawn from publication.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT, that the mandate issued in the above styled and numbered appeal on September 30, 1987, shall be withdrawn, the Petition for Rehearing shall be granted and the opinion entered on August 31, 1987, shall be withdrawn from Publication. A new opinion will be filed in lieu of the opinion being withdrawn.

PARKS, J., concurs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that members of the Commission's staff may attend the following meetings related to the transmission planning activities of the New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO):

## Joint Inter-Regional Planning Task Force/Electric System Planning Working Group

February 27, 2012, 11 a.m.-4 p.m., Local Time.

## Inter-Area Planning Stakeholder Advisory Subcommittee

March 30, 2012, 8:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m., Local Time (conference call only).

The above-referenced meetings will be held at: NYISO's offices, Rensselaer, NY.

The above-referenced meetings are open to stakeholders.

                    Further information may be found at                     *www.nyiso.com.*

The discussions at the meetings described above may address matters at issue in the following proceeding:

                    Docket No. ER08-1281,                     *New York Independent System Operator, Inc.*

                    For more information, contact James Eason, Office of Energy Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-8622 or                     *James.Eason@ferc.gov.*

Dated: February 22, 2012.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-4772 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### PREFERRED RISK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. POOLE et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 76-1926

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 23, 1976.

Wade H. Lagrone, Tupelo, Miss., for plaintiff-appellant.

David L. Coleman, Orma R. Smith, Jr., Corinth, Miss., for J. Q. Morris, et al.

Robert G. Rrohn, Corinth, Miss., for Samuel Poole.

Before COLEMAN, GOLDBERG and GEE, Circuit Judges.

*

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see *Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir.,*1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the District Court in this case, reported at 411 F.Supp. 429, is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
OFFICE OFTHEATTORNEY GENERALOF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
eon. E. Harold Beak, February 3, 1939, p%&J8 2 

Op8ratiVe", unleea orgrinlzeil pursuant to the provlsione of Our Terse Aot, or nt least authorized to do 

business In this state, and though the wording ofthe 

Aot ie 8omewhat ambiguow, we belierre that ,for a parmit to issuqthe foreign oorporatlon shall at lsast 

have been organized in oonformlty with th8 statutea 

0r this atate. 'Ashaveoompareiitbe RuralEleotrlfS,- 

cation Statute of tikaneas with that of Texas, and 

find same to be identioel in alma& ev8rg rearpeot. iW 

take it that the Ieglslature desired~that the State OS 

Texas have Bone rrort OS ooa*Lrol oter such a oorporatlon doing buslnese inTeras. If the Southwest Arkansas Eleotrio Cooperative Corporation were parmlttsd 

to oame lx'and do bwineee In this state as a forei@ 

oorporatian without a permit, the Stat8 of Texas Would 

have only Xl&ted oontrol over such corporation. We 

thinkthat the Legialatu.reofT8xas by&m. 7 of Art. 

152Sb sought to prevent auab a situation. 

Mr. Sherrill raieee the question of ubeth8r 

Se&ion 7 of ouip AOt pzohlbits the sOUthW8St ASkiumaa 

r;ytp, Cooperative Co tion 

"f"" 

firm doing business 

. We dP not be1 eve that the Legislatiire intended that It go that far, It ie our opinica.that the 

Southwest Arkansas Eleotrlo~Ooop8nMve Corporation 

may oorae into Texae aad serve the oitieew of thicr irtate, 

after it has ssoureda pcirmitfromthe Seorefaryof 

State of Taxas to do bUsioe6s in'tbls state, 

Tours very truly 

ATTORNEY 0lCRBU.L OF TELAs
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1452 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the meaning of ‘‘combat 

with the enemy’’ for purposes of service-connection of disabilities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2009 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself, Mr. WICKER, Mr. BAYH, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, and 

Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the meaning of ‘‘combat with the enemy’’ for purposes of serviceconnection of disabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Compensation Owed 

5 for Mental Health Based on Activities in Theater Post6 traumatic Stress Disorder Act’’ or the ‘‘COMBAT PTSD 

7 Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1452 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF MEANING OF ‘‘COMBAT WITH 

2 THE ENEMY’’ FOR PURPOSES OF SERVICE3 CONNECTION OF DISABILITIES. 

4 (a) CLARIFICATION.—Section 1154(b) of title 38, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘In the case’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

7 In the case’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2) For the purposes of this subsection, the term 

11 ‘combat with the enemy’ includes service on active duty— 

12 ‘‘(A) in a theater of combat operations (as de13 termined by the Secretary in consultation with the 

14 Secretary of Defense) during a period of war; or 

15 ‘‘(B) in combat against a hostile force during a 

16 period of hostilities.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (2) of subsection 

18 (b) of section 1154 of title 38, United States Code, as 

19 added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to a claim 

20 for disability compensation under chapter 11 of such title 

21 pending on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135868 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135868 

 COA: 282401 

Genesee CC: 06-019049-FC 

HERBERT EARL ALLEN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 29, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk