alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1513 

AN ACT 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small Business Act and the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1513 ES

1 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AU2 THORIZATION OF PROGRAMS UNDER THE 

3 SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND THE SMALL BUSI4 NESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An 

6 Act to extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small 

7 Business Administration’’, approved October 10, 2006 

8 (Public Law 109–316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most recently 

9 amended by section 1 of Public Law 111–10 (123 Stat. 

10 990), is amended by striking ‘‘July 31, 2009’’ each place 

11 it appears and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2009’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 subsection (a) shall take effect on July 30, 2009. 

Passed the Senate July 24, 2009. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1513 

AN ACT 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of 

other purposes. Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for programs under the Small Business Act and the
each reguiar and entire issue of said 

newspaper and not in any supplement 

thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 

18 

all in the year 2012_. 

I (or declare) under penalty of 

perJury that the foregoing is true and 

correct. 

. 

ent-s:GNATURE 

* Printer, Foreman of the Printer, or 

Principal Clerk of the Printer 

9ate, cr2- 1 X 

at El Cen 

The newly proposed and revised rules with :assodated staff rep.orts are available at the ICAPCD 

Website at VMW,w.imaeria).ca.us under "Air Pbilutfcin Contror. Hard copy requests can be made at the 

Cotmty Air Pollution Central District office, 150 SQ. 9th St .. 8 Centro, CA. 

The hearing_ will be oofl(lucted In accOrdance with the procedures of th'e Imperial County Air Pollution 

Control District Board of Directors. IHourteefl copies of written comments received more than five 

days before the hearing they will be included in the Board AAckets for this item. Comments 

should be addressed to Brad Pairiez, Air P-ollution Control offioor, at" 150 So. 9th st., El. Centro, CA 

92243. - -

All interested individuals are encouraged to attend and be heard. All supporting documentation may be 

reviewed 10 gays prior to the- scheduled hearing at the Clerk of the Bora dos Supervisors Office located 

at 940 Main Su!te·209, 8 eentro, CA. · 

l L295 

BLANCA ACOSTA 

Interim Clerk of the Board 

Air Pollution Control District 

S18 

RECEIVED 

AIR POLLUTION 

CONTROL DISTRICT
#### Indian River State Bank, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Orient Insurance Company, *Defendant in Error.*

This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Volusia county.

*Geo. M. Robbins*and *Geo. P. Raney*for plaintiff in ■error.

*A. W. Cockrell & Son*for defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

The above stated cause coming on for final disposition before Division A of the court upon the *348transcript of record' and briefs and arguments ■ of counsel for the respective parties, after due consideration the court finds that the case made in the transcript of record is substantially the same in all material particulars as that of the Indian River State Bank as plaintiff in error against the Hartford Fire Insurance Company, as defendant in error decided by written opinion by Division A of the court at the present term, in which substantially the same questions were presented as are involved in the present case, and that what is said in that case is fully decisive of the questions presented in this case. It is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby reversed with directions to overrule the demurrer of the defendant insurance company to the last amended declaration of the plaintiff below, the Indian River State Bank, and to sustain the demurrer of the said plaintiff to the pleas of the defendant in all such particulars wherein such pleas may be inconsistent with the views expressed in the said opinion of this court in the said case of the *Indian River State Bank v. The Hartford Fire Insurance Company*herein above referred to, and for such further proceedings as shall be consonant with law. The costs of this appellate proceeding to be taxed against the defendant in error.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 153 

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Arizona National 

Scenic Trail. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. KYL) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the 

Arizona National Scenic Trail. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Arizona National Sce5 nic Trail Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF ARIZONA NATIONAL SCENIC 

7 TRAIL. 

8 Section 5(a) of the National Trails System Act (16 

9 U.S.C. 1244(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•S 153 IS

1 ‘‘(27) ARIZONA NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.— 

2 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Arizona National 

3 Scenic Trail, extending approximately 807 miles 

4 across the State of Arizona from the U.S.-Mex5 ico international border to the Arizona-Utah 

6 border, as generally depicted on the map enti7 tled ‘Arizona National Scenic Trail’ and dated 

8 December 5, 2007, to be administered by the 

9 Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with 

10 the Secretary of the Interior and appropriate 

11 State, tribal, and local governmental agencies. 

12 ‘‘(B) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map 

13 shall be on file and available for public inspec14 tion in appropriate offices of the Forest Serv15 ice.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
The      undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of the knowledge of the      undersigned, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,      2008 filed by Neuro-Hitech, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of the issuer.

| Date:                August 11, 2008 | By:                                        | /s/                Matthew E. Colpoys |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                 | Matthew                E. Colpoys                    |
|                                 | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                 |                                                 |                                  |
| Date:                August 11, 2008 | By:                                        | /s/                David J. Barrett   |
|                                 | David                J. Barrett                      |
|                                 | Chief                Financial Officer               |

 

----
1

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by

assignment. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2002). 

2This type of proceeding is now denominated as a Restricted Appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 30.

NO. 07-88-0235-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

OCTOBER 28, 2002

______________________________

4-COUNTY TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS

V.

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 100TH DISTRICT COURT OF CHILDRESS COUNTY;

NO. 7108; HONORABLE JOHN T. FORBIS, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, SJ.1

In the underlying suit for writ of error,2 on February 16, 1988, the First State Bank

of Childress (the Bank) obtained a default judgment against appellants 4-County Tractor
2

& Equipment, Inc., Larry Womble, Jerry Hester and Ann Hester in the total amount of

$196,565.26, with post-judgment interest at the rate of 10% per annum until paid.

Appellants’ application for writ of error in the trial court was denied and an appeal to this

court was duly and timely perfected on October 5, 1988. On October 26, 1988, the

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was substituted for 4-County Tractor &

Equipment Inc. as the real party-in-interest. 

Appellants’ brief was filed on February 2, 1989. Appellee has filed no brief. On

January 3, 1989, appellants filed a “Suggestion of Bankruptcy” notifying this court that

appellant Larry Womble had filed for bankruptcy. On April 28, 1992, this court issued its

order abating the appeal until the receipt of notice that the bankruptcy stay had been

removed.

Nothing further occurred in this court and, on June 13, 2002, under instruction from

the court, our clerk notified all attorneys of record requesting information as to the status

of the bankruptcy and directing that a reply be made not later than ten days from the date

of the written notice. In response to that notice, we received a notification that Larry

Womble had been discharged in bankruptcy on February 6, 1994. 

However, other than that information about the discharge in bankruptcy, none of the

attorneys of record, with the exception of the attorney for the FDIC, were able to give us

any information about the status of the case. The notification to the attorney of record for

the FDIC was returned with the notation that she had moved and left no forwarding
3

address. We have received a June 17, 2002 letter from appellants’ attorney of record to

another attorney, in which appellants’ attorney states that “I simply do not recall facts

sufficient to respond to the Court’s request.”

Thus, no satisfactory response justifying the retention of this case on our docket,

we must, and do hereby, dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

John T. Boyd

Senior Justice

Do not publish.
#





















Exhibit 99.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Globetech Ventures Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dilbagh Gujral, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





(signed) Dilbagh Gujral___________________

Dilbagh Gujral,

Acting Chief Financial Officer

April 10, 2003





#
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States      Code)**

|                                         |                                                                  |                                        |
|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                                             |                                   |
| Dated: December                22, 2006 |                                                                  | /s/ Jeffrey                S. Davidson |
|                                         | Jeffrey                S. Davidson                                    |
|                                         | Co-Chairman                and                Chief Executive Officer |

|         |                          |                                   |
|--------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|    |                     |                              |
|         |                          | /s/ Udi                  Toledano |
|         | Udi                  Toledano |
|         | President                     |

----
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Adagio Acquisition II, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      William P. Dioguardi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ William
              P. DioguardiWilliam
                P. Dioguardi
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              November
                14, 2006
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, James P. Wilson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of JK Acquisition Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: May 15, 2007       /s/ James P. Wilson James P. Wilson
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Reza Zarif, certify that:  1.   I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  of  Probe Manufacturing,  Inc.;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a  material  fact  or  omit  to state a material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the period covered by this report;  3.   Based on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in  all material respects  the  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this report;  4.   The registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating to the registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which  this  report  is  being  prepared;  b)   evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure controls  and  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the  end  of  the  period  covered  by  this  report based on such evaluation;  and  c)   disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most  recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the  case  of  an  annual  report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the registrant's internal control  over  financial  reporting;  and  5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):  a)   all significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are  reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information; and  b)   any fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management or other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the registrant's  internal  control  over  financial  reporting.    DATED  this  13th day  of  November, 2007.   /s/  Reza Zarif __________________________ Reza Zarif Chief  Executive  Officer  and Director
| **EXHIBIT 23.1(A)**                                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                    |
| **Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants** |

 

To the Board of Directors

 

Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.

 

As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report dated October 23, 2008, relating to the financial statements of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd., which report appears in the Annual Report dated July 31, 2008 on Form 10-K of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.

 

October 23, 2008

 

| /s/ BKD LLP |
|-------------|
| BKD LLP     |
Exhibit 3.1



                                     AMENDED AND RESTATED
                                    ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                            OF
                                      PSB HOLDINGS, INC.
                                (As last amended November 22, 2002)


     Article 1.  Name.  The name of the Corporation is PSB Holdings, Inc.

     Article 2.  Specific Purpose.  The Corporation is organized for the

purpose of acting as a bank holding company under the provisions of the Bank

Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and for any other lawful purpose.

     Article 3.  Authorized Shares.  The aggregate number of shares that the

Corporation shall have authority to issue is 3,000,000 shares of common stock

with no par value.

     Article 4.  Registered Office and Registered Agent.  The street address of

the Corporation's registered office located in Wisconsin is 1905 West Stewart

Avenue, Wausau, Wisconsin, 54401.  The name of the Corporation's registered

agent at this address is Kenneth M. Selner.

     Article 5.  Directors.  The Board of Directors of this Corporation shall

consist of not less than five members nor more than seventeen members.  The

initial Board of Directors shall consist of 10 members.  The number of

directors may be fixed, from time to time and within the limits prescribed

herein, by resolution of the Board of Directors.

     Article 6.  Mergers, Consolidations, Sale or Share Exchange.  The

affirmative vote or consent of the holders of two-thirds of all voting groups

of this Corporation entitled to vote in elections of directors shall be

required for (a) the adoption of any agreement for the merger or
                                      -1-
consolidation of this Corporation with or into any other corporation, (b) the

sale of all or substantially all of the assets of this Corporation, or (c)

approval of a plan of share exchange of the stock of this Corporation in
<PAGE>
addition to the vote or consent of the holders of the stock of this

Corporation otherwise required by law.

     Article 7.  Amendment of Articles.  An amendment of these articles of

incorporation shall be effective only if such amendment shall have received the

affirmative vote of two-thirds of all voting groups of this Corporation

entitled to vote in the election of directors in addition to the vote or

consent of the holders of the stock of this Corporation otherwise required by

law.

     Article 8.  Supersession of Previous Articles.  These articles shall

supersede and take the place of the heretofore existing Articles of

Incorporation and all amendments thereto.
                                      -2-
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 18

- 00580

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF A.C

. , a Child

From the 289th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018JUV00416

Honorable Daphne Previti Austin, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order of adjudication

is AFFIRMED. Because appellant is indigent, no costs of this appeal are assessed.

SIGNED February 26, 2019.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice