alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 22

- 00499

- CV In the INTEREST OF J.A.M., J.R.M., J.P.M. , and J. A. M. , Children From the 365th Judicial District Court , Maverick County, Texas Trial Court No. 21

- 03

- 39707

- MCVAJA Honorable Amado J. Abascal III , Judge Presiding Opinion by: Irene Rios , Justice Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios , Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice Delivered and Filed: December 28, 2022
AFFIRMED Mother A.G

. 1 appeals the trial court’s order , wherein Mother’s sister, Y.F., was appointed sole managing conservator of Mother’s children , J.A.M., J.R.M., J.P.M., and J. A. M., and Mother was appointed possessory conservator of her children with court

- ordered possession. Mother’s parental rights were not terminated.
M other’s court

- appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief representing that she conducted a professional evaluation of the record and determined there are no arguable grounds to be raised on appe al. The brief satisfies the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967) ; s ee In re P.M. , 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 n.10 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam) (recognizing Anders

1 To protect the identity of the minor children, we refer to the parties by fictitious names, initials, or aliases. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 109.002(d); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.8(b)(2).04

- 22

- 00499

- CV

- 2

- procedure applies in pare ntal termination appeals). Counsel also certified that she sent a copy of the brief and the motion to withdraw to Mother, informed her of the right to review the record and file her own brief, and provided Mother with a form motion to request access to the record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) ; In re A.L.H. , No. 04

- 18

- 00153

- CV, 2018 WL 3861695, at *2 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Aug. 15, 2018, no pet.)

. Mother submitted a pro se brief. After reviewing the record, counsel’s brief, and Mother’s pro se brief, we agree that there are no meritorious issues to be raised and the appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order. We deny counsel’s motion to withdraw because she does not assert any ground for withdrawal other than her conclusion that the appeal is frivolous. In re P.M. , 520 S.W.3d at 27

– 28 (holding counsel’s obligations in parental termination cases extend throug h the exhaustion or waiver of all appeals, including the filing of a petition for review in the Texas Supreme Court).

Irene Rios , Justice
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 10502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL12-26-000]


MATL LLP; Montana Alberta Tie, Ltd; Notice of Petition for 
Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on February 13, 2012, MATL LLP (MATL) and Montana 
Alberta Tie Ltd (Montana Alberta Tie) (collectively, Applicants), filed 
a Petition for Declaratory Order, requesting that the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) confirm that MATL will continue to 
have negotiated rate authority following the completion of a 
transaction under which Enbridge Inc. (Enbridge) has become the new 
ultimate owner of Applicants.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b7d7e697874555752555e684e4b4b54494f7b5d5e4958155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e3a5a6b1a0ac8d8f8a8d86b09693938c9197a385869180cd848c95">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 14, 2012.

    Dated: February 14, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4015 Filed 2-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12981 and #12982]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of California dated 01/05/2012. *Incident:*
                         1502 Golden Gate Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         12/22/2011. *Effective Date:*
                         01/05/2012. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/05/2012. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/05/2012.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* San Francisco. *Contiguous Counties:* California: San Mateo. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.125Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.063Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.125Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 129815 and for economic injury is 129820. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is California. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: January 5, 2012. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2012-471 Filed 1-11-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit
32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Waterstone Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard C. Larson, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.










/s/ Richard C.
Larson


Richard
C. Larson


Chief
Financial Officer


August 8,
2008






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Waterstone Financial, Inc. and will be
retained by Waterstone Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1










CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPALEXECUTIVE OFFICER






PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In
connection with the Report of China YouTV Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Wei, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.













China
      YouTV Corp.By:
            /s/
      James
      WeiFebruary
      17, 2009
            
            James
      WeiPrincipal
      Executive Officer
#### STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Scott William KATZ, Respondent.

SCBD No. 3394. No. OBAD-756.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Jan. 13, 1987.

As Corrected Feb. 4, 1987.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 19, 1987.

ORDER

DOOLIN, Chief Justice.

Upon consideration of the certified copies of an order entered by the Supreme Court of Florida, August 13, 1986, disbarring respondent, Scott William Katz, and of the briefs and motions submitted by the parties, and of the respondent’s response to this Court’s order of November 3, 1986, the COURT FINDS:

> 1. The request for oral argument should be denied.

> 2. The Florida order of disbarment contained three counts: (1) violation of the disciplinary rules pertaining to a conflict of interest by representing a wife in a divorce proceeding and obtaining child support, and then representing the husband to reduce the child support; (2) coercion of a client by obtaining an agreement to pay damages on a claim which did not have a legal basis; and (3) misrepresentation of material facts in a sworn pleading. These actions violate 5 O.S. 1981 Ch. 1, App. 3, DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4), (5), (6); DR 4-101(A), (B); DR 5-105(A)(B); DR 7-102(A)(5); DR 9-101.

> 3. On November 25, 1986, pursuant to 5 O.S. 1981 Ch. 1, App. 1-A, Rule 7.7, this Court issued a show cause order directing the respondent to respond in writing why he should not be disciplined. The respondent failed to submit a certified transcript of the Florida proceedings nor did he assert that his conduct was insufficient grounds for discipline to be imposed. Additionally, the response did not contain any evidence in support of mitigation of the severity of discipline.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED BY THIS COURT that the respondent, Scott William Katz, be disbarred and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys. The respondent shall pay the costs of this proceeding.

HARGRAVE, V.C.J., and LAVENDER, SIMMS, OPALA, ALMA WILSON, KAUGER and SUMMERS, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Laserscope on Form
10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002, I, Dennis LaLumandiere,
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Laserscope, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Annual Report on Form
10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002 fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Laserscope.

|      |  |                |  |     |  |                                                                                                
|----- |  | -------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | March 27, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/  Dennis LaLumandiereDennis LaLumandiere
Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ESE Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Christopher M. Armstrong, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 12th day of January, 2009.                                                                                                                
|   

CHRISTOPHER M. ARMSTRONGChristopher M. ArmstrongChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


---
VI 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1654 

For the relief of Maria I. Benitez and Maria Guadalupe Lopez. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2009 

Mr. BURRIS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Maria I. Benitez and Maria Guadalupe 

Lopez. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

5 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

6 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), the beneficiaries described in sub7 section (f) shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant 

8 visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully 

9 admitted for permanent residence upon filing an applica10 tion for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1654 IS

1 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of status 

2 to lawful permanent resident. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If a beneficiary de4 scribed in subsection (f) enters the United States before 

5 the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), the bene6 ficiary shall be considered to have entered and remained 

7 lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for ad8 justment of status under section 245 of the Immigration 

9 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of the 

10 enactment of this Act. 

11 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

12 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap13 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica14 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

15 not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of 

16 this Act. 

17 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

18 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res19 idence to a beneficiary described in subsection (f), the Sec20 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce 

21 by one, during the current or next following fiscal year, 

22 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail23 able to natives of the country of the beneficiary’s nation24 ality under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nation25 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1654 IS

1 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na2 tives of the country of the beneficiary’s nationality under 

3 section 202(e) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

4 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

5 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

6 parents, brothers, and sisters of a beneficiary described 

7 in subsection (f) shall not, by virtue of such relationship, 

8 be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immi9 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.). 

10 (f) BENEFICIARIES.—The beneficiaries described in 

11 this subsection are the following: 

12 (1) Maria I. Benitez. 

13 (2) Maria Guadalupe Lopez. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
**TTM FACILITY:** Chippewa Falls, WI

**PROCESS OPERATION:**Outerlayer Etcher

**Process Tank Process**  **Contents / Concentrations Dimension of Tank (LxWxD)**  **Temp. Volume** **Rinse Rate Dump**  **Discharge Remarks**  **No. Step No.**  **(ft-in) (0F)**  **(Gal.) (GPM)**  **Frequency Disposition**  1 1 **Etching Chamber** 3-11 x 3-0 x 2-0 126 120 Not 0.25 gpm To spent etch Process tank Cleaning and applicable bleed based tank, then Freq.: once per quarter 2A 1/2 **Etch Comp Chamber** 1-11 x 3-0 x 2-0 126 5 ammonium carbonate 1% - 4% by wt. on specific offsite for Cleaning Chemistry: ammonium chloride 2% - 6% by wt. gravity recycling 10% Hydrochloric acid ammonium hydroxide 3% -8% by wt. tetraamine copper dichloride 20-35% by wt. **Worker Activity 2** 2 B, C 2 **Etcher Comp & Replenish Chambers** 1-11 x 3-0 x 2-0 Amb. 25 Not Never dumped In operation fresh etch applicable fed from Replenisher ammonium carbonate 1% - 4% by wt. 2b = 10 gallons Module to etcher based ammonium chloride 22% - 26% by wt. 2c = 10 gallons on specific gravity of ammonium hydroxide 18% -28% by wt. etchant 3 A, B, C 3 **Rinse** 2-9 x 3-0 x 2-0 Amb. 9 2 Once / week On-site WWT system 3 station cascade 3a = 3 gallons spray rinse station 3b = 3 gallons 3c = 3 gallons NOTE: Miscellaneous wastewaters from the above process tanks include spills, leaks, equipment and floor washdowns, sample bottle contents and rinsing, PPE (gloves, boots, etc) cleaning water, and safety shower/eyewash drainings that may flow into the trench serving this line and then into WW treatment system. **Fresh etch makeup from tank/tote**  **Unetched Etching Chamber**  **3 stage counter flow rinses Etched**  **Panels Panels**  **1 2A**  **2B 2C**  **Rinse chambers 3A,3B&3C**

**Worker Activity 1 To Spent Etch Tank**  **Release 1 To On-site WWT System**  Tetraamine copper dichloride 275 Kg/day Average 325 Kg/day Maximum **Comp & Replenisher chambers**
# Delegation of Waiver Authority Under Section 1022(a)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 

# Memorandum for the Attorney General 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to you the authority conferred upon the President by section 1022(a)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Public Law 112-81, to waive certain requirements of the Act. You shall exercise this authority in consultation with other senior national security officials, including the Secretaries of State, Defense, Homeland Security, Director of National Intelligence, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, and Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, as well as any other official I may designate.

                        You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                         *Federal Register*.                    

[FR Doc. 2012-5120

Billing code 4410-19-P
Extension Letter Agreement to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 

 
 CONFIDENTIAL 
 December 21, 2006 
 Soo Hong Jeong 
 #202 Sam-Ik
Park Villa 
 248 Gumi-Dong 
 Bundang, Seongnam, Kyeonggi

 Korea 463-802 
 Re: Extension of your
Employment Agreement 
 Dear S. H.: 
 This letter will amend your
Employment Agreement dated June 9, 2006 to renew the Agreement for an additional period of one year beginning on October 29, 2006 and ending on October 28, 2007. 
 Please indicate your acceptance of this amendment by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to the undersigned. 
  

									
	Sincerely,	 		 		 	
	Photronics, Inc.	 		 	Agreed:
					
	By:	 	/s/ Michael J. Luttati	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Soo Hong Jeong
		 	 	 		 		 	 
		 	Michael J. Luttati	 		 		 	Soo Hong Jeong
		 	Chief Executive Officer	 		 	Date:	 	December 29, 2006