alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

           Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Statement of Additional Information
and to the use of our reports dated February 27, 2006 with respect to the
financial statements of American Centurion Life Assurance Company and IDS Life
Insurance Company of New York (name subsequently changed to RiverSource Life
Insurance Co. of New York), January 2, 2007 with respect to the supplemental
financial statements of IDS Life Insurance Company of New York (name
subsequently changed to RiverSource Life Insurance Co. of New York), and March
31, 2006 with respect to the financial statements of ACL Variable Annuity
Account 2 (name subsequently changed to RiverSource of New York Variable
Annuity Account 2) included in the Initial Registration Statement on Form N-4
for the registration of the RiverSource Innovations(SM) Variable Annuity
offered by RiverSource Life Insurance Co. of New York.

                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                     Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 2, 2007
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 24.6
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint
Lionel Reilly, or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my
name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL
VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2002, to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 with respect to the registration of the common stock of Professional
Veterinary Products, Ltd., and generally to do and perform all things necessary
to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could
do if personally present.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ___ day of
October, 2002.

                                              /s/ Raymond C. Ebert II



STATE OF NEBRASKA            )
                             )                ss.
COUNTY OF DOUGLAS            )


         On this __ day of October, 2002, before me, a Notary Public qualified
for said County, personally came Raymond C. Ebert II, known to me to be the
identical person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the
execution thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.

                                              /s/
                                              Notary Public

                                              My commission expires:
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Renaissance Bioenergy Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Samuel Gulko, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 12th day of April 2010.





SAMUEL GULKOSamuel GulkoChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1









Independent Auditors Consent







We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-109878) on Form S-8 of PSB Holdings, Inc. of our report dated February 16, 2007, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of PSB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, which appears in the December 31, 2006, Annual Report on Form 10-K of PSB Holdings, Inc.





Wipfli LLP



WIPFLI LLP



Wausau, Wisconsin

March 14, 2007
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Bender, Appellant.

(No. 31144

Decided October 15, 1947.)

*Mr. Marvin A. Kelly,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. W. W. Weidner,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Kimble, Kimble é Schapiro,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart and Stewart, JJ., concur.

Zim:merman, J., not participating.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                               SECTION 906 OF THE

                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Telynx, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form10-KSB for the period ended October, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 12, 2007

/s/ Beth N. Ochoa
---------------------------------

Beth Ochoa, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10K OF BORLAND
INTERNATIONAL, INC. THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THE AMOUNTS SHOWN ARE IN
THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE AMOUNTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          85,169
<SECURITIES>                                     1,843
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,028
<PP&E>                                         206,051
<DEPRECIATION>                                 104,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,238
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           27,358
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           390
<OTHER-SE>                                     322,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,822
<SALES>                                        127,485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,485
<CGS>                                           18,167
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               105,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,073
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,195
<INCOME-TAX>                                       771
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,424
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,424
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
From: Jackson, Anne

To: Aagenes, Jason D.

Cc: Fenske, Mary Jean

Subject: Comments on UTAC scrubber cost estimate

Date: Friday, July 13, 2007 12:21:14 PM

Jason, Mary Jean asked me to finish up the cost estimate for this project. I am in the process of

doing that, but thought I should try to answer your questions directly. I don’t see a “natural”

place to address these questions in the cost writeup documentation, so I’m replying in this

email.

These are the comments Mary Jean passed on to me and Hal Taylor:

1) Since the proposed project is a major modification to the process and building, significant

process downtime would be anticipated. Please include the economic cost of lost production

on Line 2 during construction.

In the conduct of BACT analyses, EPA guidance directs BACT preparers to not include lost

production time in the development of capital cost estimates for retrofit projects. Because we

are preparing and comparing pollution control alternatives in the same manner as a BACT

analysis, lost production costs will not be included in this estimate.

2) Verify that complete water treatment costs for removal of fluorides, sulfates, etc. are included

(capital, O&M) for blowdown water. I’m concerned that, over time, untreated blowdown water

reporting to the tailings basin would significantly deteriorate our process water quality.

I spoke to John Engesser about the need for additional blowdown water treatment. John reports

that as long as the water in the scrubber recirculation system is treated with lime, it will be

removing sulfates and fluorides which will be landfilled with the solids and not represent a

tailing pond water problem. Chlorides will continue to build, but would take several decades to

reach levels of concern (and still be below drinking water standards).

No additional units are included in the cost estimate for water treatment.

3) Verify that proper sized process air fans are included in the design as well as increased

electrical demand. A critical component of maintaining production is ensuring that sufficient air

remains available to the grate/kiln. With an increased pressure drop expected for this type of

scrubber, the process air fans and motors may need to be upgraded.

The cost proposal includes two new ID fans and motors, and are assumed to be properly sized. Power

use is included in the annual costs.

Anne M. Jackson, P.E.

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

ph: (651) 296-7949
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

DESIGNATION OF CHAIR AND VICE

CHAIR OF THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD
OF PENNSYLVANIA :

:

:

:

: No. 316

DISCIPLINARY BOARD APPOINTMENT
DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19 th d ay of January, 2022

, J erry M. Lehocky, Esquire, is

designated as Chair

, and J ohn C. Rafferty, Jr., Esquire, as Vice

- Chair

, of the Disciplinary

Board of Pennsylvania , commencing April 1, 202 2

.
EXHIBIT 32
                           ==========



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to
     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NorthTech Corporation (Registrant)
on Form 10Q-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission filed
concurrently herewith (the Report), I, Cecelia Pineda, Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of
Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

   (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of Registrant.


                              NorthTech Corporation
                              a Nevada corporation

May 14, 2006                  By:/s/ Cecelia Pineda
                              --------------------------------------
                              President, CEO, CFO, Principal
                              Accounting Officer and Chairman
                              of the Board of Directors
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liberator BDC, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




       Date: May 15, 2008               By:  /s/ Edward J. Wegel
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                 Edward J. Wegel
                                                 Principal Executive Officer





       Date: May 15, 2008               By:  /s/ Edward J. Wegel
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                 Edward J. Wegel
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 98-4857 JACK SHERMAN WYATT, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-98-224-WMN) Submitted: June 30, 1999 Decided: September 24, 1999 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELJames S. Salkin, SALKIN & SHOCKETT, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Tarra DeShields-Minnis, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM:Jack Sherman Wyatt appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C.§ 922(g) (1994). On appeal, Wyatt challenges the sufficiency of the evidence used to convict him and contends that the district court erred in denying his motion pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. Finding no merit to either of his assignments of error on appeal, we affirm Wyatt's conviction and sentence.Considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, as we must, we have no difficulty concluding that the evidence was "sufficient for a rational trier of fact to have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." United States v. Brewer , 1 F.3d 1430, 1437 (4th Cir. 1993); see also Glasser v. United States , 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). Wyatt's contrary assertions go to the credibility of the witnesses and the weight of the evidence, rather than its sufficiency. See United States v. Saunders , 886 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir. 1989). Moreover, we find no abuse of discretion on the part of the district court in declining to order a new trial as a result of Wyatt's allegations of juror misconduct. See United States v. Dorsey , 45 F.3d 809, 817 (4th Cir. 1995); Fed. R. Evid. 606(b); see also Tanner v. United States , 483 U.S. 107, 121 (1987).Accordingly, we affirm Wyatt's conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
2006 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

2-9-2006

Jahic v. Atty Gen USA

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 04-3726

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Jahic v. Atty Gen USA" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1611.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1611
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 January 30, 2006

No. 04–3726

Sead Jahic; Selma Jahic; Amar Jahic, Petitioners

vs.

Attorney General of the United States

(A71-873-466, 67 & 68)

PRESENT: ROTH, RENDELL and BARRY, Circuit Judges.

Motion by Respondent to vacate the decision and dismiss the 

 Petition for Review for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

 

 /s/ Carolyn Hicks 

Answer due 2/13/06 Carolyn Hicks 267-299-4926

 Case Manager

 O R D E R 

The foregoing motion is GRANTED. Because petitioners are no longer subject to a final order of

deportation, this Court’s decision of August 2, 2005 is vacated and the petition dismissed for lack

of subject matter jurisdiction. 

By the Court,

/s/ Maryanne Trump Barry 

Circuit Judge

Dated: February 9, 2006

CH/cc: JBS, AMI, WCP, TJS, LSW, ERB
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                          |                                                                                                                                         |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:                November 13, 2008  | /s/                Imre Eszenyi                                                                                                         |   |
|                                          | Imre                Eszenyi                                                                                                             |   |
|                                          | Acting                President and Chairman of the Board(Principal                Executive Officer)                                   |   |
|                                          |
|                                          |                                                                                                                                         |   |
| Dated:                November 13, 2008  | /s/                Paul Biberkraut                                                                                                      |   |
|                                          | Paul                Biberkraut                                                                                                          |   |
|                                          | Chief                Financial and Administrative Officer(Principal                Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)  |   |

----
Exhibit 32.1**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,each of the undersigned officers of InferX Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-QSB”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: June 13, 2007/s/ B.K. Gogia   B.K. Gogia   Chief Executive Officer           Date: June 13, 2007/s/ Scott B. Parliament   Scott B. Parliament   Chief Financial Officer   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as a separatedisclosure document.
Order entered December 6, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01312-CV

CHAN IL PAK, Appellant

V.

AD VILLARAI, LLC, ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-06030

ORDER

By letter dated December 5, 2017, the above-numbered case was set for submission on 

Friday, December 8, 2017. We REMOVE the case from the submission docket. Appellees 

have until January 2, 2018 to file a responsive brief or rely on the brief previously filed.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project Nos. 14185-000, 14196-000]

On February 28, 2012, the Commission held a drawing to determine priority between two competing preliminary permit applications with identical filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that neither of the applicants' plans is better adapted than the other to develop, conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the region at issue, the priority established by this drawing will serve as the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order of priority is as follows:

1. Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund IV: Project No. 14185-000.

2. FFP Project 55, LLC: Project No. 14196-000.

Dated: February 29, 2012.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-5342 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P