Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2012 / Notices 12561 

2 In the notice of opportunity to request 

administrative reviews that published on February 

1, 2012 (77 FR 4990) the Department incorrectly 

listed Drill Pipe from the PRC in the month of 

February. This is the correct month of review for 

this case. 

3 If the review request involves a non-market 

economy and the parties subject to the review 

request do not qualify for separate rates, all other 

exporters of subject merchandise from the nonmarket economy country who do not have a 

separate rate will be covered by the review as part 

of the single entity of which the named firms are 

a part. 

Suspension Agreements 

None. 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), an interested party as 

defined by section 771(9) of the Act may 

request in writing that the Secretary 

conduct an administrative review. For 

both antidumping and countervailing 

duty reviews, the interested party must 

specify the individual producers or 

exporters covered by an antidumping 

finding or an antidumping or 

countervailing duty order or suspension 

agreement for which it is requesting a 

review. In addition, a domestic 

interested party or an interested party 

described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act 

must state why it desires the Secretary 

to review those particular producers or 

exporters.3 If the interested party 

intends for the Secretary to review sales 

of merchandise by an exporter (or a 

producer if that producer also exports 

merchandise from other suppliers) 

which were produced in more than one 

country of origin and each country of 

origin is subject to a separate order, then 

the interested party must state 

specifically, on an order-by-order basis, 

which exporter(s) the request is 

intended to cover. 

Please note that, for any party the 

Department was unable to locate in 

prior segments, the Department will not 

accept a request for an administrative 

review of that party absent new 

information as to the party’s location. 

Moreover, if the interested party who 

files a request for review is unable to 

locate the producer or exporter for 

which it requested the review, the 

interested party must provide an 

explanation of the attempts it made to 

locate the producer or exporter at the 

same time it files its request for review, 

in order for the Secretary to determine 

if the interested party’s attempts were 

reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(3)(ii). 

As explained in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), the Department 

has clarified its practice with respect to 

the collection of final antidumping 

duties on imports of merchandise where 

intermediate firms are involved. The 

public should be aware of this 

clarification in determining whether to 

request an administrative review of 

merchandise subject to antidumping 

findings and orders. See also the Import 

Administration web site at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov. 

All requests must be filed 

electronically in Import 

Administration’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (‘‘IA 

ACCESS’’) on the IA ACCESS Web site 

at http://iaaccess.trade.gov. See 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing 

Procedures; Administrative Protective 

Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 

2011). Further, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each 

request must be served on the petitioner 

and each exporter or producer specified 

in the request. 

The Department will publish in the 

Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation 

of Administrative Review of 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation’’ for requests received by 

the last day of March 2012. If the 

Department does not receive, by the last 

day of March 2012, a request for review 

of entries covered by an order, finding, 

or suspended investigation listed in this 

notice and for the period identified 

above, the Department will instruct CBP 

to assess antidumping or countervailing 

duties on those entries at a rate equal to 

the cash deposit of (or bond for) 

estimated antidumping or 

countervailing duties required on those 

entries at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption and to continue to collect 

the cash deposit previously ordered. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the period of review. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: February 15, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–5015 Filed 2–29–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Advance Notification of 

Sunset Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

Background 

Every five years, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the 

International Trade Commission 

automatically initiate and conduct a 

review to determine whether revocation 

of a countervailing or antidumping duty 

order or termination of an investigation 

suspended under section 704 or 734 of 

the Act would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

or a countervailable subsidy (as the case 

may be) and of material injury. 

Upcoming Sunset Reviews for April 

2012 

The following Sunset Reviews are 

scheduled for initiation in April 2012 

and will appear in that month’s Notice 

of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset 

Reviews. 

Antidumping duty proceedings Department contact 

Folding Gift Boxes From the People’s Republic of China (A–570–866) (2nd Review) ............................... Jennifer Moats (202) 482–5047. 

Seamless Pipe and Pressure Pipe From Germany (A–428–820) (3rd Review) ......................................... Dana Mermelstein (202) 482–1391. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

12562 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2012 / Notices 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

No Sunset Review of suspended 

investigations is scheduled for initiation 

in April 2012. 

Suspended Investigations 

No Sunset Review of suspended 

investigations is scheduled for initiation 

in April 2012. 

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on 

methodological or analytical issues 

relevant to the Department’s conduct of 

Sunset Reviews is set forth in the 

Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3— 

Policies Regarding the Conduct of Fiveyear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 

(April 16, 1998). The Notice of Initiation 

of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews 

provides further information regarding 

what is required of all parties to 

participate in Sunset Reviews. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a service list for these 

proceedings. To facilitate the timely 

preparation of the service list(s), it is 

requested that those seeking recognition 

as interested parties to a proceeding 

contact the Department in writing 

within 10 days of the publication of the 

Notice of Initiation. 

Please note that if the Department 

receives a Notice of Intent to Participate 

from a member of the domestic industry 

within 15 days of the date of initiation, 

the review will continue. Thereafter, 

any interested party wishing to 

participate in the Sunset Review must 

provide substantive comments in 

response to the notice of initiation no 

later than 30 days after the date of 

initiation. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: February 8, 2012 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–5012 Filed 2–29–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[Application No. 10–2A001] 

Export Trade Certificate of Review 

ACTION: Notice of Application (10– 

2A001) to Amend the Export Trade 

Certificate of Review Issued to Alaska 

Longline Cod Commission (‘‘ALCC’’), 

Application no. 10–2A001. 

SUMMARY: The Office of Competition 

and Economic Analysis (‘‘OCEA’’) of the 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, has received 

an application to amend an Export 

Trade Certificate of Review 

(‘‘Certificate’’). This notice summarizes 

the proposed amendment and requests 

comments relevant to whether the 

amended Certificate should be issued. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of 

Competition and Economic Analysis, 

International Trade Administration, 

(202) 482–5131 (this is not a toll-free 

number) or email at etca@trade.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of 

the Export Trading Company Act of 

1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the 

Secretary of Commerce to issue Export 

Trade Certificates of Review. An Export 

Trade Certificate of Review protects the 

holder and the members identified in 

the Certificate from State and Federal 

government antitrust actions and from 

private treble damage antitrust actions 

for the export conduct specified in the 

Certificate and carried out in 

compliance with its terms and 

conditions. Section 302(b)(1) of the 

Export Trading Company Act of 1982 

and 15 CFR 325.6(a) require the 

Secretary to publish a notice in the 

Federal Register identifying the 

applicant and summarizing its proposed 

export conduct. 

Request for Public Comments 

Interested parties may submit written 

comments relevant to the determination 

whether an amended Certificate should 

be issued. If the comments include any 

privileged or confidential business 

information, it must be clearly marked 

and a nonconfidential version of the 

comments (identified as such) should be 

included. Any comments not marked as 

privileged or confidential business 

information will be deemed to be 

nonconfidential. 

An original and five (5) copies, plus 

two (2) copies of the nonconfidential 

version, should be submitted no later 

than 20 days after the date of this notice 

to: Export Trading Company Affairs, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 

7021–X, Washington, DC 20230. 

Information submitted by any person 

is exempt from disclosure under the 

Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 

552). However, nonconfidential versions 

of the comments will be made available 

to the applicant if necessary for 

determining whether or not to issue the 

Certificate. Comments should refer to 

this application as ‘‘Export Trade 

Certificate of Review, application 

number 10–2A001.’’ 

ALCC’s original Certificate was issued 

on May 13, 2010 (75 FR 29514, May 26, 

2010). A summary of the current 

application for an amendment follows. 

Summary of the Application 

Applicant: Alaska Longline Cod 

Commission (‘‘ALCC’’), 271 Wyatt Way 

NE., Suite 106, Bainbridge Island, WA 

98110. 

Contact: Duncan R. McIntosh, 

Attorney, Telephone: (206) 624–5950. 

Application No.: 10–2A001. 

Date Deemed Submitted: February 14, 

2012. 

Proposed Amendment: ALCC seeks to 

amend its Certificate to: 

1. Add the following company as new 

Member of the Certificate within the 

meaning of section 325.2(l) of the 

Regulations (15 CFR 325.2(l)): Coastal 

Villages Longline, LCC, #711 H Street, 

#200, Anchorage, AK 99501. 

Dated: February 24, 2012. 

Joseph E. Flynn, 

Director, Office of Competition and Economic 

Analysis. 

[FR Doc. 2012–4917 Filed 2–29–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is 

automatically initiating a five-year 

review (‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the 

antidumping duty order listed below. 

The International Trade Commission 

(‘‘the Commission’’) is publishing 

concurrently with this notice its notice 

of Institution of Five-Year Review which 

covers the same orders. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Department official identified in the 

Initiation of Review section below at 

AD/CVD Operations, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

For information from the Commission 

contact Mary Messer, Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission at (202) 205–3193. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES