alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         718,798
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,022,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,903,205
<PP&E>                                          84,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,690,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,316,012
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        93,365
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,271,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,690,852
<SALES>                                         37,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               301,434
<CGS>                                           24,582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (102,707)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,116,527)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,116,527)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,116,527
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-135627, 333-134514, 333-133773, 333-17027, 333-26047, 333-34492 and 333-64002) and Form S-1 (File No. 333-130869) of PW Eagle, Inc. (formerly Eagle Plastics Industries, Inc.) of our reports dated
March 25, 2005 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP       
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP           
|                                     
|Minneapolis, Minnesota March 14,
2007
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2.58 MB)

Tags:dla, Medical supply chain, Medcom, USAMRMC, Strong Partnerships, Warfighter First, DLA Troop Support

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
                          BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Jurisdiction
                                                                        of
Name                                                              Incorporation
----                                                              --------------
<S>                                                               <C>
BORLAND AUSTRALIA PTY LTD. ......................................   Australia
BORLAND CANADA, INC. ............................................     Canada
BORLAND (UK) LIMITED............................................. United Kingdom
BORLAND (HOLDING) UK LIMITED..................................... United Kingdom
BORLAND (FRANCE).................................................     France
BORLAND GMBH.....................................................    Germany
INPRISE (H.K.) LTD. .............................................   Hong Kong
BORLAND (JAPAN) CO., LTD. .......................................     Japan
BORLAND (SINGAPORE) PTE., LTD. ..................................   Singapore
BORLAND B.V. (NETHERLANDS).......................................  Netherlands
INPRISE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION...................................     Russia
BORLAND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION...................................    Delaware
BORLAND LATIN AMERICA LTDA.......................................     Brazil
INPRISE SOLUTIONS GMBH...........................................    Germany
BORLAND SOFTWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED...........................     India
BORLAND KOREA LTD. ..............................................     Korea
INPRISE (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED....................................  New Zealand
</TABLE>
_____________

No. 95-3977NE

_____________

Terry L. Christianson, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District

* of Nebraska.

Robert P. Houston; Attorney *

General, State of Nebraska, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

_____________

Submitted: May 13, 1996

 Filed: May 22, 1996

_____________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Terry L. Christianson appeals the district court's denial of his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Initially, we reject Christianson's contention

that Nebraska's robbery statute is constitutionally ambiguous. Having

rejected Christianson's constitutional claim, we conclude Christianson's

trial and appellate counsel were not ineffective for failing to challenge

the statute's constitutionality. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

THOMAS STINE,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

____________________ 

2010-5125 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 08-CV-0063, Judge George W. Miller. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

MICHAEL D.J. EISENBERG, Law Office of Michael D.J. 

Eisenberg, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffappellant. 

JOHN S. GROAT, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation 

Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of 

Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendantappellee. With him on the brief were TONY WEST, 

Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, 

Director, and KIRK T. MANHARDT, Assistant Director. Of 

counsel on the brief was KATHLEEN L. KADLEC, United 

States Department of the Navy, of Washington, DC. 
______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LINN and 

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 12, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41017 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JESUS MORALES

- SANCHEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:14

- CR

- 912

- 1

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Jesus Morales

- Sanchez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2) and was sentenced to 41 months of imprisonment

. Morales

- Sanchez appealed and asserted that the district court plainly erred by convicting, sentencing, and entering judgment against him under § 1326(b)(2) based on its determination that his prior conviction for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 2, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41017 Document: 00514779681 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/02/2019No. 15

- 41017 Summary Calendar

2 Texas aggravated assault qualified as a conviction for a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). W e granted the Government’s moti on for summary affirmance and affirmed Morales

- Sanchez ’s conviction. The Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded for consideration in the light of Sessions v. Dimaya , 138 S. Ct. 1204 (2018)

. On remand, the parties agree that Dimaya precludes using § 16(b)’s crime of violence definition as the basis for designating Morales

- Sanchez’s Texas aggravated assault conviction as an aggravated felony that would justify his § 1326(b)(2) conviction. The parties dispute whether a Texas aggravated assault convi ction is an aggravated felony as a crime of violence defined by § 16(a) in accordance with United States v. Shepherd , 848 F.3d 425, 427

- 28 (5th Cir. 2017). The law on this issue is not settled. Therefore, even if Morales

Sanchez is correct in arguing tha t Texas aggravated assault is not an aggravated felony, he cannot show that the district court clearly or obviously erred in its judgment. Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009); United States v. Rodriguez

- Parra , 581 F.3d 227, 230 (5th Cir. 20 09). Morales

- Sanchez’s judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED. Case: 15-41017 Document: 00514779681 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/02/2019
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12640-12641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4925]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Revocation of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration by the Wind-Up Order of the United States 
District Court of the Western District of Kentucky, Louisville 
Division, dated July 11, 2011, the United States Small Business 
Administration hereby revokes the license of Prosperitas Investment 
Partners, L.P. a Kentucky limited partnership, to function as a small 
business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company 
License No. 04/74-0283 issued to Prosperitas Investment Partner, L.P., 
on June 29, 2000 and said license is hereby declared null and void as 
of July 11, 2011.


[[Page 12641]]


United States Small Business Administration.
Sean J. Greene,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 2012-4925 Filed 2-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

TMI PRODUCTS INC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ROSEN ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEMS LP,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-1553

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Central District of California in No. 5:12-cv-02263-RGKSP, Judge R. Gary Klausner.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

TMI PRODUCTS INC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ROSEN ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEMS LP,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________ 

2014-1585

______________________ 

Case: 14-1553 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 11/06/2014
2 TMI PRODUCTS INC v. ROSEN ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEMS

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Central District of California in No. 5:12-cv-02263-RGKSP, Judge R. Gary Klausner.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Rosen Electronics, L.P. moves without opposition to 

voluntarily dismiss its cross-appeal, No. 2014-1585, 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b).

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion is granted. Appeal No. 2014-1585 is 

dismissed.

(2) The revised official caption is reflected above.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs in Appeal No. 

2014-1585. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 2014-1585 only): 

November 6, 2014 

s30

Case: 14-1553 Document: 50 Page: 2 Filed: 11/06/2014
Exhibit 23.1

                                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration  statements
of HPR Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos.  033-80141,  033-80143,  and  033-80145) and
Form S-3 (File No.  333-12749) of our report dated August 1, 1997, on our audits
of the  consolidated  financial  statements  of HPR Inc. as of June 30, 1997 and
1996 and for the years ended June 30,  1997,  1996,  and 1995,  which  report is
included in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1997. We
also consent to the reference to our firm under Item 6, Selected Financial Data.



                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Boston, Massachusetts
August 21, 1997
EXHIBIT 10.15

LIST OF CERTAIN BENEFITS 

  AVAILABLE TO CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS




The following benefits are available to some or all executive officers (among other persons), but not to all full-time employees of the registrant. 

	 	
1)	
If the Board has authorized a stock repurchase program, an executive may request the repurchase of shares of the registrant at the day’s volume-weighted average price with no payment of any fees or commissions if the
repurchase of the shares is otherwise permissible under the authorized program.	
	 
	 	
2)	
An automobile allowance is paid to certain executive officers and others up to a limit. The limit applicable to the CEO for 2006 was $19,150 annually. Certain maintenance and repair expenses associated with automobiles
covered by the allowance are reimbursed by the registrant.	
	 
	 	
3)	
Employees above a certain grade level, including executive officers, who are members of a country club or other social organization and who use the club in part for business purposes may request payment of 50% of the annual
dues associated with the club.	
	 
	 	
4)	
The registrant’s disability insurance program generally is available to employees. Persons above a certain grade level, including executive officers, are paid an amount each year intended to reimburse premiums
associated with the program.	
	 
	 	
5)	
The registrant makes available or pays for tax preparation, tax consulting, estate planning, and financial counseling services for executive officers.	
	 
	 	
6)	
The registrant occasionally allows certain employees, including executive officers, or their spouses to travel for personal purposes in company aircraft on trips that occur for business reasons. Such cases typically result
in no additional costs for the registrant, since the seat filled would have otherwise been empty, but do result in the recognition of taxable income for the employee involved.	
	 
	 	
7)	
On occasion spouses of certain employees, including executive officers, are asked by the registrant, for business reasons, to accompany the employee on a business trip or function. In those cases the registrant may pay the
travel, accommodation, and other expenses of the spouse incidental to the trip or function, some or all of which can result in taxable income for the employee.	
	 
	 	
8)	
The registrant provides a relocation benefit to a wide range of employees, including executive officers, under varying circumstances and subject to certain constraints. The benefit may be in the form of an allowance or a
reimbursement of actual expenses.	
	 
	 	
9)	
The registrant offers certain health club benefits to a wide range of employees, including executive officers.	
	 
	 	
10)	
The registrant provides a cash allowance to certain employees, including executive officers, which is intended to defray expenses associated with goods and services purchased personally and used at least in part for
business purposes (such as cell phone service).
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Stephanie Stone,

 

 Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas,

State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00343-CR

Appeal from the

403rd District Court

of Travis County, Texas 

(TC# D-1-DC-16-907410)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until May 24, 2017. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. J. Deniz Kadirhan, the Appellant’s Attorney, 

prepare the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before May 24, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5

th day of April, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
```

[Federal Register: March 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 52)]
[Notices]               
[Page 13087]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18mr10-45]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, March 24, 2010; 3-5 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered

Compliance Weekly Report--Commission Briefing

    The staff will brief the Commission on the status of various 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: March 16, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-6132 Filed 3-16-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
DISMISS; Opinion Filed August 28, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00623-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.U., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-52121-2013

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Evans

Opinion by Justice Myers

This is an appeal from the trial court’s temporary orders in a pending suit for divorce and orders 

regarding conservatorship of the child. Because an appeal from an interlocutory order can only be taken 

if authorized by statute, and the Texas Family Code specifically precludes an interlocutory appeal from an 

order for the temporary conservatorship of a child, we directed appellant Father to file a letter brief 

demonstrating our jurisdiction over the appeal. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 105.001(e) (West 2008); 

Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992). We directed Father to file the brief 

no later than July 29, 2013. To date, however, Father has not complied or otherwise communicated with 

the Court. Accordingly, with no authority granting us jurisdiction over the complained-of order, we 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

130623F.P05

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

In the Interest of S.U., A Minor Child

No. 05-13-00623-CV

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-52121-2013.

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices 

Lang and Evans participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee Dawn Deborah Ukpong recover her costs of this appeal from appellant 

Onoyom Ukpong.

Judgment entered this 28th day of August, 2013.

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

RICKY SCHLOTT, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 201 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Maritime Acquisition Corp. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      the undersigned’s knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
      certified.




Signed
                on this 10th day of May, 2007
            /s/  
                Prokopios (Akis) TsirigakisProkopios
                (Akis) TsirigakisChairman,
                Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal
                Executive Officer)/s/   George
                SyllantavosGeorge
                SyllantavosChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer)