alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         985,382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  427,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,659
<INVENTORY>                                  1,394,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,791,066
<PP&E>                                      45,141,204
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,606,417
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,992,708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,212,564
<BONDS>                                     15,908,582
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    25,271,737
<OTHER-SE>                                     587,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,992,708
<SALES>                                     66,583,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            66,583,196
<CGS>                                       22,408,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,408,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            43,116,157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,291,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (196,478)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    65,119
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (131,359)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    (132,299)
<NET-INCOME>                                 (263,658)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# TIMES AND DATES:

The Commission has scheduled a meeting for the following date: March 9, 2012 at 9:30 a.m.

# PLACE:

Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, Lobby Level Hearing Room (Room 1300).

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Commission has scheduled this meeting to consider various rulemaking matters, including the issuance of proposed rules and the approval of final rules. The Commission may also consider and vote on dates and times for future meetings. The agenda for this meeting will be made available to the public and posted on the Commission's Web site at                         *http://www.cftc.gov*                         at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting. In the event that the time or date of the meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

David A. Stawick, Secretary of the Commission, 202-418-5071.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2012-4867 Filed 2-27-12; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Black Nickel Acquisition Corp. III
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul
      T.
      Mannion Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      ss.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Paul
              T.
              Mannion Jr.Paul
              T. Mannion Jr.Principal
              Executive OfficerMay 10, 2006
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00472-CR

Donald Kenneth Mitchell, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

NO. 77434, THE HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Donald Kenneth Mitchell seeks to appeal his December 7, 2017 judgment of 

conviction. The thirty-day deadline for perfecting the appeal was January 8, 2018, and the 

deadline for seeking an extension of time to file the notice of appeal was January 22, 2018. See

Tex. R. App. P. 4.1, 26.2(a)(1), 26.3. But this notice of appeal was filed September 21, 2020.

1

Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of this purported appeal 

in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 918 

S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (concluding that when belated notice of appeal is 

filed without timely motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal, appellate court must 

1

 This is Mitchell’s second attempted appeal from this conviction. See Mitchell v. State, 

No. 03-18-00210-CR, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 4196, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin June 12, 2018, no 

pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). The remedy for a late-filed notice of appeal is 

to file a postconviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals 

for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07.
2

dismiss purported appeal for lack of jurisdiction); see also Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (holding that amendments to rules of appellate procedure did not affect 

Olivo’s rationale requiring timely notice of appeal to vest appellate court with jurisdiction).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Kelly

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: October 16, 2020

Do Not Publish
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1694 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1694

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
  To allow the funding for the interoperable emergency communications 
 grant program established under the Digital Television Transition and 
  Public Safety Act of 2005 to remain available until expended through 
                fiscal year 2012, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PUBLIC SAFETY INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS GRANTS.

    (a) Notwithstanding section 3006(a)(2) of the Digital Television 
Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005 (47 U.S.C. 309 note), sums 
made available to administer the Public Safety Interoperable 
Communications Grant Program under section 309(j)(8)(E) of the 
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)(8)(E)) shall remain 
available until expended, but not beyond September 30, 2012.
    (b) The period for performance of any investment approved under the 
Program as of the date of enactment of this Act shall be extended by 
one year, but not later than September 30, 2011, except that the 
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information may 
extend, on a case-by-case basis, the period of performance for any 
investment approved under the Program as of that date for a period of 
not more than 2 years, but not later than September 30, 2012. In making 
a determination as to whether an extension beyond September 30, 2011, 
is warranted, the Assistant Secretary should consider the circumstances 
that gave rise to the need for the extension, the likelihood of 
completion of performance within the deadline for completion, and such 
other factors as the Assistant Secretary deems necessary to make the 
determination.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 577 

Permitting the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares during the 

holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2014 

Mr. SANDERS (for himself and Mr. BURR) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Permitting the collection of clothing, toys, food, and 

housewares during the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. COLLECTION OF CLOTHING, TOYS, FOOD, AND 

3 HOUSEWARES DURING THE HOLIDAY SEASON 

4 FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES IN SENATE 

5 BUILDINGS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of the rules or regulations of the Senate— 

8 (1) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or em9 ployee of the Senate may collect from another Sen10 ator, officer of the Senate, or employee of the Senate 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 577 IS 

1 within Senate buildings nonmonetary donations of 

2 clothing, toys, food, and housewares for charitable 

3 purposes related to serving persons in need or mem4 bers of the Armed Forces and the families of those 

5 members during the holiday season, if the charitable 

6 purposes do not otherwise violate any rule or regula7 tion of the Senate or of Federal law; and 

8 (2) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or em9 ployee of the Senate may work with a nonprofit or10 ganization with respect to the delivery of donations 

11 described under paragraph (1). 

12 (b) EXPIRATION.—The authority provided by this 

13 resolution shall expire at the end of the second session 

14 of the 113th Congress. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1




AULTRA
GOLD INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Aultra Gold Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rauno Perttu, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company  and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.




Date: August
      19, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Rauno
      PerttuRauno
      PerttuPresident
      and Chief ExecutiveOfficer
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

ARTHUR CARMONA, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 18-0457 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2013-424039-001

The Honorable Danielle J. Viola, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Arthur Carmona, Kingman

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Diane M. Johnsen, Judge Maria Elena Cruz, and Judge 

Randall M. Howe delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 10-9-2018
STATE v. CARMONA

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Arthur Carmona seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s second 

petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 

2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. Petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review but deny relief.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Red Rock Pictures Holdings,
Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
the Company for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2009 (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  April
      19, 2010/s/
      Reno RolléReno
      Rollé,President,
      Chief Executive Officer, and Director
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1338 

AN ACT 

To require the accreditation of English language training 

programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1338 ES

1 SECTION 1. ACCREDITATION OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE 

2 TRAINING PROGRAMS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(a) of the Immigra4 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (15)(F)(i), by striking ‘‘a lan6 guage’’ and inserting ‘‘an accredited language’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(52) The term ‘accredited language training pro9 gram’ means a language training program that is accred10 ited by an accrediting agency recognized by the Secretary 

11 of Education.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

13 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para14 graph (2), the amendments made by subsection (a) 

15 shall— 

16 (A) take effect on the date that is 180 

17 days after the date of the enactment of this 

18 Act; and 

19 (B) apply with respect to applications for 

20 a nonimmigrant visa under section 

21 101(a)(15)(F)(i) of the Immigration and Na22 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(F)(i)) that 

23 are filed on or after the effective date described 

24 in subparagraph (A). 

25 (2) TEMPORARY EXCEPTION.— 
3 

†S 1338 ES

1 (A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sec2 tion 101(a)(15)(F)(i) of the Immigration and 

3 Nationality Act, as amended by subsection (a), 

4 during the 3-year period beginning on the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act, an alien seeking 

6 to enter the United States to pursue a course 

7 of study at a language training program that 

8 has been certified by the Secretary of Home9 land Security and has not been accredited or 

10 denied accreditation by an entity described in 

11 section 101(a)(52) of such Act may be granted 

12 a nonimmigrant visa under such section 

13 101(a)(15)(F)(i). 

14 (B) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT.—An 

15 alien may not be granted a nonimmigrant visa 

16 under subparagraph (A) if the sponsoring insti17 tution of the language training program to 

18 which the alien seeks to enroll does not— 

19 (i) submit an application for the ac20 creditation of such program to a regional 

21 or national accrediting agency recognized 

22 by the Secretary of Education within 1 

23 year after the date of the enactment of this 

24 Act; and 
4 

†S 1338 ES

1 (ii) comply with the applicable accred2 iting requirements of such agency. 

Passed the Senate September 27, 2010. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1338 

AN ACT 

To require the accreditation of English language 

training programs, and for other purposes.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.23 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, dla

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Broad Based Employee Stock Option Plan Amendment


    

      Exhibit
        10(e)

      


      AMENDMENT
        NUMBER TWO TO THE WALGREEN CO. BROAD BASED EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION
        PLAN

      


      


      Effective
        October 11, 2006, the second paragraph of Article 4 of the Plan is amended
        in
        its entirety to read as follows:

      


      "In
        the
        event of any change (increase or decrease) in the outstanding shares of the
        Company by reason of a stock dividend, recapitalization, merger, consolidation,
        stock split, split up, spin off, combination or exchange of shares,
        reorganization, liquidation, or other change in corporate capitalization,
        the
        aggregate number and class of Shares available under this Plan, the number
        and
        class of Shares subject to each outstanding Option and the Option prices
        shall
        be appropriately and proportionately adjusted by the Committee to prevent
        dilution or enlargement of rights and preserve the value of outstanding awards;
        provided that fractional Shares shall be rounded to the nearest whole Share.
        The
        Committee’s determination shall be final and
        conclusive."