alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of InterAmerican Acquisition Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Morro, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:  August
18, 2009


By:
            /s/ William C.
      Morro


William
Morro


Chief
Executive Officer


(principal
executive officer and


principal
financial officer)
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 138 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal alternative minimum 

tax limitations on private activity bond interest, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Ms. SNOWE, and Mrs. LINCOLN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

alternative minimum tax limitations on private activity 

bond interest, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX LIMI4 TATIONS ON PRIVATE ACTIVITY BOND INTER5 EST. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 57(a)(5) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(D) TERMINATION.—This paragraph 

10 shall not apply to bonds issued after the date 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 138 IS

1 of the enactment of this subparagraph. The 

2 preceding sentence shall not apply to any re3 funding bond unless such preceding sentence 

4 applied to the refunded bond (or in the case of 

5 a series of refundings, the original bond).’’. 

6 (b) NO ADJUSTMENT TO ADJUSTED CURRENT

7 EARNINGS.—Clause (iii) of section 56(g)(4)(B) of the In8 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as fol9 lows: 

10 ‘‘(iii) TAX EXEMPT INTEREST ON CER11 TAIN BONDS.—Clause (i) shall not apply in 

12 the case of any interest on a bond to which 

13 section 57(a)(5)(D) applies.’’. 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of 

16 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000117 05-NOV-2018 08:11 AM
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ PETER H. BEER, TERRY J. HATTER, JR., THOMAS F. HOGAN, RICHARD A. PAEZ, JAMES ROBERTSON, LAURENCE H. SILBERMAN, A. WALLACE TASHIMA AND U. W. CLEMON, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. UNITED STATES, Defendant Appellee.

__________________________
2010-5012

__________________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in case no. 09-CV-037, Senior Judge Robert H. Hodges, Jr.

__________________________
O R D E R

The court has received briefs in this case on the issue that was the subject of the remand from the Supreme Court. Each side may file a reply of no more than 10 pages in length, to be received by the court no later than November 10, 2011. Oral argu ment will be heard before a panel of this court on Friday, December 16, 2011, at 10

a.m.BEER v. US 2

The parties shall notify the clerk in writing of the name of the counsel who will present oral argument no later than November 28, 2011.

F OR T HE C OURT

September 30, 2011 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Christopher Landau, Esq. Brian M. Simkin, Esq. Jeffrey A. Lamken, Esq.
**Exhibit
      32.0**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADDED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE** **SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Equitable Financial Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I hereby
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company
              as of and for the period covered by this
              Report.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









By:  /s/
      Richard L. Harbaugh


Richard
      L. Harbaugh


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


November
      13, 2006













By:  /s/
      Kim E. Marco


Kim
      E.
      Marco


Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


November
      13, 2006
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 

CONSERVATION 

Standard Operating Permit Condition XIV – Document 

Submittals and Electronic Copies 

Permit Condition for Air Quality Permits 

Adopted by Reference in 18 AAC 50.346 

August 20. 2008 
Standard Permit Condition XIV – 

Document Submittals and Electronic Copies August 20. 2008 

 2 

Standard Operating Permit Condition XIV – Document 

Submittals and Electronic Copies 

Emission Unit or Stationary Source Categories This Condition Applies to: 

 Condition XIV.1 applies to all sources and Permittees subject to 18 AAC 

50.326(a)-(c). 

The department will use Standard Permit Condition XIV in any operating permit unless 

the department determines that emission unit or stationary source specific conditions 

more adequately meet the requirements of 18 AAC 50. 

Permit Wording: 

<Insert Section Number here> - Permit Changes and Renewal 

1. The Permittee shall comply with the following requirements for submitting 

application information to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): 

1.1 The permittee shall provide a copy of each application for modification or 

renewal of this permit, including any compliance plan, or application 

addenda, at the time the application or addendum is submitted to the 

department; 

1.2 The information shall be submitted to the same address as in Condition 

<insert reference to Annual Compliance Certification condition 

subparagraph with EPA’s address>;

1.3 To the extent practicable, the permittee shall provide to EPA applications in 

portable document format (pdf); MS Word format (.doc); or other computerreadable format compatible with EPA's national database management 

system; and 

1.4 The permittee shall maintain records as necessary to demonstrate compliance 

with this condition. 

[18 AAC 50.040(j)(7), 18 AAC 50.326(b), 12/1/04] 

[40 CFR 71.10(d)(1)), 7/1/04] 
Standard Permit Condition XIV – 

Document Submittals and Electronic Copies August 20. 2008 

 3 

STATEMENT OF BASIS FOR THE PERMIT CONDITIONS 

The state and federal regulations for each Condition are cited in Operating Permit 

No. <Insert Operating Permit Number here>. 

Condition <insert condition cross-reference>, Permit Applications and Submittals 

Applicability: Applies because the permittee may need to submit permit 

applications and related correspondence. 

Factual Basis: Condition XIV directs the applicant to send copies of all 

application materials required to be submitted to the Department directly to the EPA, 

in electronic format if practicable. This condition shifts the burden of compliance 

from the Department to ensure that copies of application materials are submitted to 

EPA by transferring that responsibility to the Permittee.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-30638

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANTHONY SCOTT TAYLOR,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 6:04-CR-60023-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Anthony Scott Taylor

on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Taylor has filed a response in

which he plainly states his wish to withdraw his appeal. Taylor’s motion for

voluntary dismissal is GRANTED; counsel’s Anders motion is DENIED AS

MOOT; and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See FED. R. APP. P. 42(b).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 15, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-30638 Document: 00511382567 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2011
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                               CROWN VANTAGE INC.
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Crown Vantage Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-96788, File No. 33-96854,
File No. 33-96856, File No. 333-09361 and File No. 333-4420) of our report
dated February 23, 1996 on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Crown Vantage Inc. as of December 31, 1995 and for each of the
two years in the period ended December 31, 1995 and the related financial
statement schedule as of December 31, 1995 and for the period since inception
through December 31, 1995, which report is included as Exhibit 23.1 to this
Form 10-K.

                                   COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

San Francisco, California
March 25, 1997




                                       24
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.45
ASSURED GUARANTY LTD.
DESCRIPTION OF 2016 EXECUTIVE OFFICER CASH COMPENSATION


Set forth below are the 2016 annual salaries of the Executive Officers named in the compensation tables in Assured Guaranty’s 2016 proxy statement. 
 
	
		
	Executive Officer
	Salary

	

Dominic J. Frederico
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$1,150,000

	

Robert A. Bailenson
Chief Financial Officer
	$600,000

	

James M. Michener
General Counsel
	$600,000

	

Russell B. Brewer II
Chief Surveillance Officer
	$450,000

	

Bruce E. Stern
Executive Officer
	$450,000






The named executive officers will also be eligible for the following:
		
	•
	To be considered to receive non-equity incentive compensation for 2016 performance.


		
	•
	To be considered to receive grants in 2017 under Assured Guaranty’s long-term incentive plans for 2016 performance.  


		
	•
	To receive other annual compensation and benefits, including employer contributions to retirement plans and perquisites provided under the Assured Guaranty Ltd. Perquisite Policy.
No, 83291



# FILED
AUG 1 2 2021
ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK • PREME COURT BY DEPUTY CLERK. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TH

- E STATE OF NEVADA

TULY LEPOLO, Petitioner,
vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; THE HONORABLE MICHAEL VILLANL DISTRICT J LLDG E; AN D TH E HONORABLE DAVID BARKER, SENIOR JUDGE, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges district court oral decisions denying a motion for bail and a renewed motion for bail.

It is petitioner's burden to demonstrate that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 9 9 8, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). As part of petitioner's burden, it was his obligation to provide an appendix that includes all records essential to understand the issues raised in the petition. See NRAP 21(a)(4); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228-29, 88 P.3d at 844. This obligation included, at a minimum. contacting real party in interest and the district court to facilitate preparation of the court's order and, if such an order was not promptly forthcoming, proposing his own order for the district court's review. See Rust v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev. 686, 689, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987) (explaining that a written order is essential to this court's review). Petitioner does not, however. argue

Soften Couar OF NEVADA 10) 1947A 460or demonstrate that he made any such attempt to do so, instead merely

indicating that no written order was entered. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

6-dt c„)

. Hardesty

J. Parraguirre Cadish

cc: Chiefjudge, The Eighth judicial District Court Hon. David Barker, Senior Judge Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Special Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
101 1947A 04601e, 2
II 

Calendar No. 507 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1448 

[Report No. 111–245] 

To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, to authorize the Coquille Indian 

Tribe, the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians, the Confederated Tribes 

of the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw, the Klamath Tribes, and 

the Burns Paiute Tribe to obtain 99-year lease authority for trust land. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2009 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

AUGUST 3, 2010 

Reported by Mr. DORGAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, to authorize the 

Coquille Indian Tribe, the Confederated Tribes of Siletz 

Indians, the Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower 

Umpqua, and Siuslaw, the Klamath Tribes, and the 

Burns Paiute Tribe to obtain 99-year lease authority 

for trust land. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1448 RS

1 SECTION 1. LEASES OF RESTRICTED LAND. 

2 Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of Au3 gust 9, 1955 (25 U.S.C. 415(a)), is amended in the second 

4 sentence by inserting ‘‘land held in trust for the Coquille 

5 Indian Tribe, land held in trust for the Confederated 

6 Tribes of Siletz Indians, land held in trust for the Confed7 erated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw 

8 Indians, land held in trust for the Klamath Tribes, and 

9 land held in trust for the Burns Paiute Tribe,’’ after 

10 ‘‘lands held in trust for the Confederated Tribes of the 

11 Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon,’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 507 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1448 

[Report No. 111–245] 

A BILL 

To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, to authorize 

obtain 99-year lease authority for trust land. Klamath Tribes, and the Burns Paiute Tribe to of the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw, the Tribes of Siletz Indians, the Confederated Tribes the Coquille Indian Tribe, the Confederated 

AUGUST 3, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following are descriptions of subsidiaries which are directly or indirectly
owned by the BostonFed Bancorp, Inc .(the "Company"):

Boston Federal Savings Bank. Boston Federal Savings Bank ("Boston Federal") is a
subsidiary of the Company and is a federally-chartered savings bank.

Broadway National Bank. Broadway National Bank ("Broadway National") is a
subsidiary of the Company and is a nationally-chartered commercial bank.

BFD Preferred Capital Trust I. BFD Preferred Capital Trust I is a subsidiary of
the Company and was organized as a common law trust under New York law in 2000.

BFD Preferred Capital Trust II. BFD Preferred Capital Trust II is a subsidiary
of the Company and was organized as a statutory business trust under Delaware
law in 2000.

Diversified Ventures, Inc. d/b/a Forward Financial Company. Forward Financial
Company was acquired by Boston Federal in December 1999. It is incorporated
under Massachusetts law and operates as a subsidiary of Boston Federal.

Elmsmere Insurance Agency, Inc. Ellsmere Insurance Agency, Inc. was acquired by
Broadway National in December 1999. It is incorporated under Massachusetts law
and operates as a subsidiary of Broadway National.

BFS Preferred Capital Corp. BFS Preferred Capital Corp. is a subsidiary of
Boston Federal and was organized under Massachusetts law in 1998 as a real
estate investment trust, in satisfaction of Section 858 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended.

BNB Preferred Capital Corp. BNB Preferred Capital Corp. is a subsidiary of
Broadway National and was organized under Massachusetts law in 1998 as a real
estate investment trust, in satisfaction of Section 858 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended.

BFS Security Corp. BFS Security Corp. is a subsidiary of Boston Federal and was
organized under Massachusetts law in 1998 as an investment subsidiary.

BNB Security Corp. BNB Security Corp. is a subsidiary of Broadway National and
was organized under Massachusetts law in 1998 as an investment subsidiary.

BF Funding Corporation. BF Funding Corporation is a subsidiary of the Company
and was organized under Massachusetts law in 1995 for purposes of funding the
Boston Federal Savings Bank ESOP plan.

Leader Corporation. Leader Corporation is incorporated under Massachusetts law
and is a subsidiary of Boston Federal.


<PAGE>   2



Connelly Development Corporation is incorporated under Massachusetts law and is
a subsidiary of Leader Corporation. It has been inactive and will be closed in
2001.

Connelly Hill Limited Partnership is a partnership under Massachusetts law. It
is owned by Leader Corporation and Connelly Development Corporation. The
partnership is inactive and will be closed in 2001.
Exhibit 32.1

NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009 (the Report), I, James S. Quarforth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ James S. QuarforthJames S. QuarforthChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors


November 6, 2009
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with this Quarterly Report of AISystems, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen Johnston, Chief Executive Officer of AISystems, Inc., certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AISystems, Inc.
 
 
 Date:November 15, 2010                                                                      /s/Stephen Johnston
 Stephen Johnston
 Chief Executive Officer
## THE ATIWDRNEY GENERAL OF -XAS AUSTXN, 'I-EXAR 78711 November IO,1967
Honorable Homer Garrison, Jr. Opinion No. M-l56 DireCtor,Texas Department of Public.Safety P.0. Box 4087, North Austin Station Re: Whether under Senate Bill No. 15, 60th Austin, Texas 7875 1 Legislature, authorizing the Department of Public Safety to purchase land and to construct a subdistrict headquarters building in El Paso, the Department may purchase the land together ,with the desired fully constructed building, without the necessity of DearColonel Garrison: construction.

In your request for an opinion from this office you state the following: “Werequest your opinion on the following: Senate Bill i5 ofthe 60th Legislatureprovides in part as follows:

‘$‘From funds appropriated above for the Department ofPublic Safety Construction Program, the Department is authorized to undertake the followingprojects: “ ‘

. . 1 “ ‘7. For the purchase of land and the construction of a subdistrict headquarters building in El Paso.’

“The Department has located property in El Paso, Texas, with a suitable building which will provide necessary facilities. Can the Department purchase this property even though there will be no construction required?

‘I

. . .” In construing the statute, the Court must look to the object to be accomplished and place on it a reasonable or liberal construction which willbest effect its purpose rather than one which will defeat it. 82 C.J.S. 593, Statutes, Sec.323, An act should be givenapractical and reasonable rather than aliteral construction so asto accomplish asnearly aspossible the intent of the Legislature. Brown andRoot v.Durhnd. 126Tex. 20, 84 S.W.Zd1073 (1935). Astatute will
-727-Col. Homer Garrison, Jr., page2,

be construed in such manner as to accomplish the legislative intent Independent LifeInsurance Company Y.Work, 124 Tex. 281, 77 S.W.2d 1036 (1934). T’he aim and object of construction is to ascertain and enforce the legislative intent. Kay Y. Schneider, 110 Tex. 369, 218 SW. 479 (1920). By enacting said Senate Bill No. 15, the 60th Legislature intended to authorize the Department of Public Safety to aCquirea subdistrict headquarters building in El Paso, Texas. The purchase of land includes the purchase of any permanent improvements situated upon the land. The object for which the legislation was enacted will be fulfilled by purchasing land with a suitable building on it.

It is the opinion of this office that the Department of Public Safety has the authority under Senate Bill No. 1 S ofthe 60th Legislature to purchase land in El Paso,Texas, with a suitable subdistrict headquarters building upon it even though no construction is required. SUMMARY Senate Bill No. 15ofthe 60th Legislature authorizes the Department of Public Safety to purchase land in El Paso, Texas, with a suitable subdistrict headquarters building upon it even though no construction will be required.

ney General of Texas Prepared by Jack Sparks Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMI’ITEE Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman Kerns B. Taylor, Co-Chairman W.V. Geppert Pat Cain Steve Hollahan Joseph H. Sharpley STAFF LEGAL ASSISTANT’ A. J. Carubbi, Jr. -728.