C-148 

Figure C-73b. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Best 

20 percent days at Dolly Sods (DOSO), West Virginia for Soil (top left), CM (top right), Sea Salt 

(bottom left) and Total Bext (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 500
 C-149 

Figure C-74. Bugle Plots of Fractional Bias and Fractional Gross Error for DOSO and 

the Best 20 Percent Days. 

Appendix F - 501
 C-150 

2.3.15.2 DOSO Worst 20 Percent Days 

Figure C-75a. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Worst 

20 percent days at Dolly Sods (DOSO), West Virginia for SO4 (top left), NO3 (top right), OMC 

(bottom left) and EC (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 502
 C-151 

Figure C-75b. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Worst 

20 percent days at Dolly Sods (DOSO), West Virginia for Soil (top left), CM (top right), Sea Salt 

(bottom left) and Total Bext (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 503
 C-152 

Figure C-76. Bugle Plots of Fractional Bias and Fractional Gross Error for DOSO and 

the Worst 20 Percent Days. 

Appendix F - 504
 C-153 

2.3.15.3 DOSO for All Days 

Figure C-77. Time series of predicted and observed SO4, NO3, OMC, EC, Soil, CM, 

Sea Salt and PM2.5 mass across all monitoring days at Dolly Sods (DOSO), West Virginia for 

the CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km base case simulation.

Appendix F - 505
 C-154 

Figure C-77. (concluded) Time series of predicted and observed SO4, NO3, OMC, EC, 

Soil, CM, Sea Salt and PM2.5 mass across all monitoring days at Dolly Sods (DOSO), West 

Virginia for the CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km base case simulation.

Appendix F - 506
 C-155 

2.3.16 Breton Island Wildlife Refuge (BRET), Louisiana 

2.3.16.1 BRET Best 20 Percent Days 

Figure C-78a. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Best 

20 percent days at Breton (BRET), Louisiana for SO4 (top left), NO3 (top right), OMC (bottom 

left) and EC (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 507
 C-156 

Figure C-78b. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Best 

20 percent days at Breton (BRET), Louisiana for Soil (top left), CM (top right), Sea Salt (bottom 

left) and Total Bext (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 508
 C-157 

Figure C-79. Bugle Plots of Fractional Bias and Fractional Gross Error for BRET and 

the Best 20 Percent Days. 

Appendix F - 509
 C-158 

2.3.16.2 BRET Worst 20 Percent Days 

Figure C-80a. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Worst 

20 percent days at Breton (BRET), Louisiana for SO4 (top left), NO3 (top right), OMC (bottom 

left) and EC (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 510
 C-159 

Figure C-80b. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Worst 

20 percent days at Breton (BRET), Louisiana for Soil (top left), CM (top right), Sea Salt (bottom 

left) and Total Bext (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 511
 C-160 

Figure C-81. Bugle Plots of Fractional Bias and Fractional Gross Error for BRET and 

the Worst 20 Percent Days. 

Appendix F - 512
 C-161 

2.3.16.3 BRET for All Days 

Appendix F - 513
 C-162 

Figure C-82. Time series of predicted and observed SO4, NO3, OMC, EC, Soil, CM, 

Sea Salt and PM2.5 mass across all monitoring days at Breton (BRET), Louisiana for the 

CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km base case simulation.

Appendix F - 514
 C-163 

2.3.17 Caney Creek Wilderness Area (CACR), Arkansas 

2.3.17.1 CACR Best 20 Percent Days 

Figure C-83a. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Best 

20 percent days at Caney Creek (CACR), Arkansas for SO4 (top left), NO3 (top right), OMC 

(bottom left) and EC (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 515
 C-164 

Figure C-83b. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Best 

20 percent days at Caney Creek (CACR), Arkansas for Soil (top left), CM (top right), Sea Salt 

(bottom left) and Total Bext (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 516
 C-165 

Figure C-84. Bugle Plots of Fractional Bias and Fractional Gross Error for CACR and 

the Best 20 Percent Days. 

Appendix F - 517
 C-166 

2.3.17.2 CACR Worst 20 Percent Days 

Figure C-85a. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Worst 

20 percent days at Caney Creek (CACR), Arkansas for SO4 (top left), NO3 (top right), OMC 

(bottom left) and EC (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 518
 C-167 

Figure C-85b. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Worst 

20 percent days at Caney Creek (CACR), Arkansas for Soil (top left), CM (top right), Sea Salt 

(bottom left) and Total Bext (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 519
 C-168 

Figure C-86. Bugle Plots of Fractional Bias and Fractional Gross Error for CACR and 

the Worst 20 Percent Days. 

Appendix F - 520
 C-169 

2.3.17.3 CACR for All Days 

Appendix F - 521
 C-170 

Figure C-87. Time series of predicted and observed SO4, NO3, OMC, EC, Soil, CM, 

Sea Salt and PM2.5 mass across all monitoring days at Caney Creek (CACR), Arkansas for the 

CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km base case simulation.

Appendix F - 522
 C-171 

2.3.18 Upper Buffalo Wilderness Area (UPBU), Arkansas 

2.3.18.1 UPBU Best 20 Percent Days 

Figure C-88a. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Best 

20 percent days at Upper Buffalo (UPBU), Arkansas for SO4 (top left), NO3 (top right), OMC 

(bottom left) and EC (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 523
 C-172 

Figure C-88b. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Best 

20 percent days at Upper Buffalo (UPBU), Arkansas for Soil (top left), CM (top right), Sea Salt 

(bottom left) and Total Bext (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 524
 C-173 

Figure C-89. Bugle Plots of Fractional Bias and Fractional Gross Error for UPBU and 

the Best 20 Percent Days. 

Appendix F - 525
 C-174 

2.3.18.2 UPBU Worst 20 Percent Days 

Figure C-90a. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Worst 

20 percent days at Upper Buffalo (UPBU), Arkansas for SO4 (top left), NO3 (top right), OMC 

(bottom left) and EC (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 526
 C-175 

Figure C-90b. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Worst 

20 percent days at Upper Buffalo (UPBU), Arkansas for Soil (top left), CM (top right), Sea Salt 

(bottom left) and Total Bext (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 527
 C-176 

Figure C-91. Bugle Plots of Fractional Bias and Fractional Gross Error for UPBU and 

the Worst 20 Percent Days. 

Appendix F - 528
 C-177 

2.3.18.3 UPBU for All Days 

Figure C-92. Time series of predicted and observed SO4, NO3, OMC, EC, Soil, CM, 

Sea Salt and PM2.5 mass across all monitoring days at Upper Buffalo (UPBU), Arkansas for the 

CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km base case simulation.

Appendix F - 529
 C-178 

Figure C-92. (concluded) Time series of predicted and observed SO4, NO3, OMC, EC, 

Soil, CM, Sea Salt and PM2.5 mass across all monitoring days at Upper Buffalo (UPBU), 

Arkansas for the CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km base case simulation.

Appendix F - 530
 C-179 

2.3.19 Mingo Wildlife Refuge (MING), Missouri 

Figure C-96... .   . . ٛ ๓ ๓〃ٛٛٛٛٛٛ MING Best 20 Percent Days 

Figure C-93a. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Best 

20 percent days at Mingo (MING), Missouri for SO4 (top left), NO3 (top right), OMC (bottom left) 

and EC (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 531
 C-180 

Figure C-93b. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Best 

20 percent days at Mingo (MING), Missouri for Soil (top left), CM (top right), Sea Salt (bottom 

left) and Total Bext (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 532
 C-181 

Figure C-94. Bugle Plots of Fractional Bias and Fractional Gross Error for MING and 

the Best 20 Percent Days. 

Appendix F - 533
 C-182 

2.3.19.2 MING Worst 20 Percent Days 

Figure C-95a. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Worst 

20 percent days at Mingo (MING), Missouri for SO4 (top left), NO3 (top right), OMC (bottom left) 

and EC (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 534
 C-183 

Figure C-95b. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Worst 

20 percent days at Mingo (MING), Missouri for Soil (top left), CM (top right), Sea Salt (bottom 

left) and Total Bext (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 535
 C-184 

Figure C-96. Bugle Plots of Fractional Bias and Fractional Gross Error for MING and 

the Worst 20 Percent Days. 

Appendix F - 536
 C-185 

2.3.19.3 MING for All Days 

Figure C-97. Time series of predicted and observed SO4, NO3, OMC, EC, Soil, CM, 

Sea Salt and PM2.5 mass across all monitoring days at Mingo (MING), Missouri for the CMAQ 

2002 Base G2 12 km base case simulation.

Appendix F - 537
 C-186 

Figure C-97. (concluded) Time series of predicted and observed SO4, NO3, OMC, EC, 

Soil, CM, Sea Salt and PM2.5 mass across all monitoring days at Mingo (MING), Missouri for 

the CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km base case simulation.

Appendix F - 538
 C-187 

2.3.20 Hercules Glade Wilderness Area (HEGL), Missouri 

2.3.20.1 HEGL Best 20 Percent Days 

Figure C-98a. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Best 

20 percent days at Hercules Glade (HEGL), Missouri for SO4 (top left), NO3 (top right), OMC 

(bottom left) and EC (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 539
 C-188 

Figure C-98b. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Best 

20 percent days at Hercules Glade (HEGL), Missouri for Soil (top left), CM (top right), Sea Salt 

(bottom left) and Total Bext (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 540
 C-189 

Figure C-99. Bugle Plots of Fractional Bias and Fractional Gross Error for HEGL and 

the Best 20 Percent Days. 

Appendix F - 541
 C-190 

2.3.20.2 HEGL Worst 20 Percent Days 

Figure C-100a. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the 

Worst 20 percent days at Hercules Glade (HEGL), Missouri for SO4 (top left), NO3 (top right), 

OMC (bottom left) and EC (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 542
 C-191 

Figure C-100b. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the 

Worst 20 percent days at Hercules Glade (HEGL), Missouri for Soil (top left), CM (top right), Sea 

Salt (bottom left) and Total Bext (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 543
 C-192 

Figure C-101. Bugle Plots of Fractional Bias and Fractional Gross Error for HEGL and 

the Worst 20 Percent Days. 

Appendix F - 544
 C-193 

2.3.20.3 HEGL for All Days 

Figure C-102. Time series of predicted and observed SO4, NO3, OMC, EC, Soil, CM, 

Sea Salt and PM2.5 mass across all monitoring days at Hercules Glade (HEGL), Missouri for 

the CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km base case simulation.

Appendix F - 545
 C-194 

Figure C-102. (concluded) Time series of predicted and observed SO4, NO3, OMC, EC, 

Soil, CM, Sea Salt and PM2.5 mass across all monitoring days at Hercules Glade (HEGL), 

Missouri for the CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km base case simulation.

Appendix F - 546
 C-195 

2.3.21 Brigantine Wildlife Refuge (BRIG), New Jersey 

2.3.21.1 BRIG Best 20 Percent Days 

Figure C-103a. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Best 

20 percent days at Brigantine (BRIG), New Jersey for SO4 (top left), NO3 (top right), OMC 

(bottom left) and EC (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 547
 C-196 

Figure C-103b. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the Best 

20 percent days at Brigantine (BRIG), New Jersey for Soil (top left), CM (top right), Sea Salt 

(bottom left) and Total Bext (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 548
 C-197 

Figure C-104. Bugle Plots of Fractional Bias and Fractional Gross Error for BRIG and 

the Best 20 Percent Days. 

Appendix F - 549
 C-198 

2.3.21.2 BRIG Worst 20 Percent Days 

Figure C-105a. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the 

Worst 20 percent days at Brigantine (BRIG), New Jersey for SO4 (top left), NO3 (top right), OMC 

(bottom left) and EC (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 550
 C-199 

Figure C-105b. CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km Actual base case model performance for the 

Worst 20 percent days at Brigantine (BRIG), New Jersey for Soil (top left), CM (top right), Sea 

Salt (bottom left) and Total Bext (bottom right). 

Appendix F - 551
 C-200 

Figure C-106. Bugle Plots of Fractional Bias and Fractional Gross Error for BGIG and 

the Worst 20 Percent Days. 

Appendix F - 552
 C-201 

2.3.21.3 BRIG for All Days 

Figure C-107. Time series of predicted and observed SO4, NO3, OMC, EC, Soil, CM, 

Sea Salt and PM2.5 mass across all monitoring days at Brigantine (BRIG), New Jersey for the 

CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km base case simulation.

Appendix F - 553
 C-202 

Figure C-107. (concluded) Time series of predicted and observed SO4, NO3, OMC, EC, 

Soil, CM, Sea Salt and PM2.5 mass across all monitoring days at Brigantine (BRIG), New 

Jersey for the CMAQ 2002 Base G2 12 km base case simulation.

Appendix F - 554
 

APPENDIX D 

Air Quality Model 

Performance Evaluation: 

Spatial Maps of Model Performance 

 on the Best and Worst 20 Percent Days 

 at VISTAS and Nearby Class I Areas

 

Appendix F - 555
D. SPATIAL PLOTS 

The 12km domain spatial plots of model-simulated daily concentration of the constituents 

of particle pollution most responsible for light extinction for 2002, with the actual 

observed concentrations overlaid are presented in this section. These plots are presented 

for the entire 12km domain. The 20 percent best and 20 percent worst days used in 

calculating light extinction for the IMPROVE monitoring sites representative of the 

VISTA’s Class I Federal areas are presented here. Table C-1 in Appendix C of Appendix 

F lists the 20 percent best and worst days for all of the VISTA’s Class I Federal areas, 

including Cape Romain. 

There are three pages of overlays for each date identified as a 20 percent best or 20 

percent worst day for any of the Class I Federal Area. The first page for each date 

contains the spatial plots for sulfate (SO4), nitrate (NO3), ammonium (NH4), and organic 

carbon (OC). The second page contains plots for elemental carbon (EC), coarse matter 

(CM), sea salt, and the soil constituent of fine particulate matter. The third page in the 

series is a plot of total fine particulate matter (PM2.5). A table immediately follows the 

plot of total reconstructed particulate matter, which details whether that particular date 

was a 20 percent best or 20 percent worst day in each of the Class I Federal areas. The 

color scale for all of the plots moves from lower concentrations in shade of blue to 

warmer colors for higher ozone concentrations. 

Across the 12km modeling domain, the general spatial pattern of peaks and valleys of 

sulfate concentrations were well represented. Gradients across South Carolina were 

generally well captured. There was some tendency for under-prediction or displacement 

of peaks especially on days with complex gradient. There was a tendency for the model 

to perform better on days with wide spread high sulfate concentrations. 

For nitrates, there were some issues with capturing the exact magnitude of peaks and 

minimum concentrations in the modeling. However, the spatial pattern was captured 

reasonably well, even with the typically low concentration seen across the southeast. 

Ammonium model performance was similar, as there were issues capturing the exact 

magnitudes of minimums and maximums, but with generally good spatial pattern capture. 

Organic carbon had well captured spatial patterns with only a slight issue in capturing 

peak values, which were usually just slightly displaced from observed values. The model 

also seemed to have a weaker concentration gradient than suggested by observations. 

Elemental carbon generally had low values, with some isolated high values likely due to 

large sources (or large urban areas) with minimal plume dispersion, which were not 

captured with the IMPROVE monitoring observations. 

Coarse matter pattern is not handled as well as other species, especially with respect to 

capturing finer concentration gradients. The observations along the Appalachian 

Mountains from late spring through summer are not captured well, as peak values are 

often missed. However, at this same time, concentrations to the northwest are captured 

well. By the fall, concentrations lower, and are better represented. Sea salt model 

________________________________________________________________________ 

D-1 

Appendix F - 556
________________________________________________________________________ 

D-2 

performance is a little hard to quantify, as there are few observation throughout 2002 to 

base an analysis. Generally concentrations are low, with most peaks occurring near the 

coast, which at least follow natural logic. The model predicted peaks near the shore 

usually do not reach as high as the available observations, but further support the model 

produced pattern. 

The soil component of particulate matter is generally over predicted, especially peaks 

through the Midwestern states. The model shows some grasp of the pattern of soil 

concentrations, but with actual magnitudes of peak values over predicted. The model 

seems to do better with lower concentrations through the coastal states. 

For reconstructed fine particulate matter, the overall pattern is generally predicted well, 

with a slight under-prediction of peak values. Widespread events are generally captured 

well (especially June 4th, 10th, and 19th). Performance during the summer seems 

especially well captured as well. 

Appendix F - 557
 D-3 

D.1 January 5, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

01/05/02 5 W20% CHAS, EVER, SWAN, HEGL 

01/05/02 5 B20% LIGO, SHRO, SHEN, DOSO 

Figure D-1: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 5, 2002 

Appendix F - 558
 D-4 

Figure D-2: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 5, 2002 

Appendix F - 559
 D-5 

Figure D-3: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For January 5, 2002 

Appendix F - 560
 D-6 

D.2 January 8, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

01/08/02 8 W20% 

01/08/02 8 B20% LIGO, SHRO, GRSM, JARI, BRET 

Figure D-4: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 8, 2002 

Appendix F - 561
 D-7 

Figure D-5: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 8, 2002 

Appendix F - 562
 D-8 

Figure D-6: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For January 8, 2002 

Appendix F - 563
 D-9 

D.3 January 11, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

01/11/02 11 W20% 

01/11/02 11 B20% LIGO, SHRO, GRSM, JARI, SIPS, SAMA, OKEF, 

CACR 

Figure D-7: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 11, 2002 

Appendix F - 564
 D-10 

Figure D-8: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 11, 2002 

Appendix F - 565
 D-11 

Figure D-9: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For January 11, 2002 

Appendix F - 566
 D-12 

D.4 January 14, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

01/14/02 14 W20% 

01/14/02 14 B20% 

GRSM, SIPS, SAMA, CACR, BRET, SHEN, 

DOSO, SWAN, HEGL, MACA, ROMA, UPBU, 

MING 

Figure D-10: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Appendix F - 567
 D-13 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 14, 2002 

Figure D-11: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 14, 2002 

Appendix F - 568
 D-14 

Figure D-12: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For January 14, 2002 

Appendix F - 569
 D-15 

D.5 January 17, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

01/17/02 17 W20% OKEF, CHAS, ROMA 

01/17/02 17 B20% 

Figure D-13: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 17, 2002 

Appendix F - 570
 D-16 

Figure D-14: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 17, 2002 

Appendix F - 571
 D-17 

Figure D-15: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For January 17, 2002 

Appendix F - 572
 D-18 

D.6 January 20, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

01/20/02 20 W20% MING, BRIG 

01/20/02 20 B20% SAMA, OKEF, BRET 

Figure D-16: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 20, 2002 

Appendix F - 573
 D-19 

Figure D-17: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 20, 2002 

Appendix F - 574
 D-20 

Figure D-18: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For January 20, 2002 

Appendix F - 575
 D-21 

D.7 January 23, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

01/23/02 23 W20% OKEF 

01/23/02 23 B20% LIGO, GRSM, JARI, SHEN, DOSO, EVER, 

COHU, MACA, ROMA 

Figure D-19: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 23, 2002 

Appendix F - 576
 D-22 

Figure D-20: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 23, 2002 

Appendix F - 577
 D-23 

Figure D-21: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For January 23, 2002 

Appendix F - 578
 D-24 

D.8 January 26, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

01/26/02 26 W20% CHAS 

01/26/02 26 B20% LIGO, SHRO, JARI, SIPS, CACR, SHEN, DOSO, 

SWAN, HEGL, COHU, UPBU 

Figure D-22: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 26, 2002 

Appendix F - 579
 D-25 

Figure D-23: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 26, 2002 

Appendix F - 580
 D-26 

Figure D-24: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For January 26, 2002 

Appendix F - 581
 D-27 

D.9 January 29, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

01/29/02 29 W20% ROMA 

01/29/02 29 B20% EVER 

Figure D-25: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 29, 2002 

Appendix F - 582
 D-28 

Figure D-26: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For January 29, 2002 

Appendix F - 583
 D-29 

Figure D-27: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For January 29, 2002 

Appendix F - 584
 D-30 

D.10 February 1, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

02/01/02 32 W20% 

02/01/02 32 B20% GRSM, SIPS, SAMA, BRET, EVER, COHU, 

MACA, MING, BRIG 

Figure D-28: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentr:ations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 1, 2002 

Appendix F - 585
 D-31 

Figure D-29: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 1, 2002 

Appendix F - 586
 D-32 

Figure D-30: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For February 1, 2002 

Appendix F - 587
 D-33 

D.11 February 4, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

02/04/02 35 W20% SAMA, EVER 

02/04/02 35 B20% JARI, MACA 

Figure D-31: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 4, 2002 

Appendix F - 588
 D-34 

Figure D-32: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 4, 2002 

Appendix F - 589
 D-35 

Figure D-33: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For February 4, 2002 

Appendix F - 590
 D-36 

D.12 February 7, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

02/07/02 38 W20% 

02/07/02 38 B20% LIGO, SHRO, GRSM, SAMA, OKEF, BRET, 

SHEN, CHAS, COHU 

Figure D-34: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 7, 2002 

Appendix F - 591
 D-37 

Figure D-35: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 7, 2002 

Appendix F - 592
 D-38 

Figure D-36: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For February 7, 2002 

Appendix F - 593
 D-39 

D.13 February 10, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

02/10/02 41 W20% CHAS 

02/10/02 41 B20% 

Figure D-37: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 10, 2002 

Appendix F - 594
 D-40 

Figure D-38: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 10, 2002 

Appendix F - 595
 D-41 

Figure D-39: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For February 10, 2002 

Appendix F - 596
 D-42 

D.14 February 13, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

02/13/02 44 W20% SAMA, OKEF, BRET, CHAS, EVER, ROMA 

02/13/02 44 B20% JARI, HEGL, COHU, MACA, MING 

Figure D-40: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 13, 2002 

Appendix F - 597
 D-43 

Figure D-41: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 13, 2002 

Appendix F - 598
 D-44 

Figure D-42: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For February 13, 2002 

Appendix F - 599
 D-45 

D.15 February 16, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

02/16/02 47 W20% SAMA, BRET, CHAS, ROMA 

02/16/02 47 B20% UPBU 

Figure D-43: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 16, 2002 

Appendix F - 600
 D-46 

Figure D-44: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 16, 2002 

Appendix F - 601
 D-47 

Figure D-45: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For February 16, 2002 

Appendix F - 602
 D-48 

D.16 February 19, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

02/19/02 50 W20% 

02/19/02 50 B20% SHRO, GRSM, SHEN, DOSO 

Figure D-46: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 19, 2002 

Appendix F - 603
 D-49 

Figure D-47: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 19, 2002 

Appendix F - 604
 D-50 

Figure D-48: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For February 19, 2002 

Appendix F - 605
 D-51 

D.17 February 22, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

02/22/02 53 W20% SWAN, ROMA 

02/22/02 53 B20% 

Figure D-49: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 22, 2002 

Appendix F - 606
 D-52 

Figure D-50: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 22, 2002 

Appendix F - 607
 D-53 

Figure D-51: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For February 22, 2002 

Appendix F - 608
 D-54 

D.18 February 25, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

02/25/02 56 W20% GRSM, SAMA, OKEF, CHAS, EVER, SWAN, 

COHU 

02/25/02 56 B20% 

Figure D-52: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 25, 2002 

Appendix F - 609
 D-55 

Figure D-53: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 25, 2002 

Appendix F - 610
 D-56 

Figure D-54: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For February 25, 2002 

Appendix F - 611
 D-57 

D.19 February 28, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

02/28/02 59 W20% SHEN 

02/28/02 59 B20% GRSM, JARI, SIPS, OKEF 

Figure D-55: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 28, 2002 

Appendix F - 612
 D-58 

Figure D-56: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For February 28, 2002 

Appendix F - 613
 D-59 

Figure D-57: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For February 28, 2002 

Appendix F - 614
 D-60 

D.20 March 3, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

03/03/02 62 W20% EVER 

03/03/02 62 B20% LIGO, GRSM, OKEF, SHEN, COHU, MACA, 

ROMA, MING 

Figure D-58: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For March 3, 2002 

Appendix F - 615
 D-61 

Figure D-59: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For March 3, 2002 

Appendix F - 616
 D-62 

Figure D-60: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For March 3, 2002 

Appendix F - 617
 D-63 

D.21 March 6, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

03/06/02 65 W20% 

03/06/02 65 B20% ROMA 

Figure D-61: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For March 6, 2002 

Appendix F - 618
 D-64 

Figure D-62: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For March 6, 2002 

Appendix F - 619
 D-65 

Figure D-63: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Total Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM25) Concentration Spatial Plots For March 6, 2002 

Appendix F - 620
 D-66 

D.22 March 9, 2002 

Date Julian Day Type Class I Areas Affected 

03/09/02 68 W20% 

03/09/02 68 B20% 

SHRO, GRSM, JARI, SAMA, BRET, SHEN, 

DOSO, CHAS, SWAN, HEGL, MACA, ROMA, 

UPBU, BRIG 

Figure D-64: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Appendix F - 621
 D-67 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For March 9, 2002 

Figure D-65: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For March 9, 2002 

Appendix F - 622
 D-68 

Figure D-66: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Sulfate (SO4) Component 

Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Nitrate (NO3) Component 

Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Ammonium (NH4) Component 

Concentrations, And Daily Average Organic Carbon (OC) Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For March 12, 2002 

Appendix F - 623
 D-69 

Figure D-67: Modeled Predicted And Observed Daily Average Elemental Carbon (EC) 

Component Concentrations (top left), Daily Average Coarse Particle Mass 

(CM) Component Concentrations (top right), Daily Average Sea Salt 

Component Concentrations, And Daily Average Soil Component 

Concentrations Spatial Plots For March 12, 2002 

Appendix F - 624