alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 117 DB 2023 (No. 70 RST 2023)

:

KENNETH EVERETT MCPHERSON : Attorney Registration No. 51316

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION : ( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26 th day of October , 2023, the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated October 17 , 2023, is approved and it is ORDERED that

KENNETH EVERETT MCPHERSON , who has been on Administrative Suspension, has

dem onstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law

required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby

reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses

incurred b y the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by

the Petitioner.
RULE 203. TRANSFER .

_ An Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate shall not be transferable, whether by operation of law or otherwise, ` either from one location to another, from one piece of equip- ®

ment to another, or from one person to another.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly report of Frezer, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: November 14, 2005



|By: | /s/ David Koos                
|--- | ------------------------------
|    | David Koos                    
|    | Acting Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Frezer, Inc. and will be retained by Frezer, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM NUCO2 INC.
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                336,510
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       4,457,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                          395,491
<INVENTORY>                                           211,027
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    5,267,479
<PP&E>                                             97,827,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                     12,392,012
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    124,498,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               8,387,017
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                7,217
<OTHER-SE>                                         55,635,670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      124,498,267
<SALES>                                            35,077,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   35,077,361
<CGS>                                              18,578,063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      36,886,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  3,809,138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (5,447,807)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (5,447,807)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       186,945
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (5,634,752)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.78)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10416 

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GEORGE MUNOZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:92-CR-102-A

--------------------

November 27, 2002

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent George

Munoz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Munoz

received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief and has filed a

response. Munoz submits that counsel’s Anders brief is deficient

because counsel fails to raise a nonfrivolous issue. Munoz argues

that the district court failed to follow 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(5),

which requires the district court to consider “any pertinent policy
No. 02-10416

-2-

statement issued by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

994(a)(2) that is in effect on the date the defendant is

sentenced.” 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(5). Munoz also moves for the

appointment of counsel. His motion is DENIED.

Our independent review of the brief, the issues raised in

Munoz’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1413 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1413

To amend the Adams National Historical Park Act of 1998 to include the 
 Quincy Homestead within the boundary of the Adams National Historical 
                     Park, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 8, 2009

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Adams National Historical Park Act of 1998 to include the 
 Quincy Homestead within the boundary of the Adams National Historical 
                     Park, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Adams National 
Historical Park Boundary Addition Act of 2009''.
    (b) Finding.--The Quincy Homestead has been designated a National 
Historic Landmark.

SEC. 2. ADDITION TO ADAMS NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    Section 4(b) of the Adams National Historical Park Act of 1998 (16 
U.S.C. 410eee-2(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
            (2) by adding after paragraph (1) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(2) The property at 34 Butler Road in Quincy, 
        Massachusetts, known as the Quincy Homestead and carriage shed, 
        consisting of approximately 1.8 acres, as generally depicted on 
        the map entitled `Boundary Addition Adams National Historical 
        Park', numbered N.E.R.R.D. 386/80,001, and dated August, 
        2003.''.
                                 <all>
```
### Court of Appeals, State ofMichigan ORDER In Re Pierson/Berry, Minors Docket No. 328599; 328675 LC No. 02-002014-NA Michael J. Talbot Presiding Judge Joel P. Hoekstra Douglas B. Shapiro

Judges In light of this Court's opinion in In re D Gach, _Mich App_; _NW2d_ (Docket No. 328714, April 19, 2016), the Court, on its own motion, orders that this Court's April 19, 2016 opinion and concurrent order are hereby VACATED . A new opinion and order is attached.

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr. , ChiefClerk, on 

# APR 

# , z 6 

# 2016 Date
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Initial Review Group, Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Clinical Trials Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         March 26, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Courtyard by Marriott, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Charles H Washabaugh, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch,National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Heath, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 824, MSC 4872, Bethesda, MD 20817, (301) 496-9568,                         *washabac@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 23, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-4909 Filed 2-29-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Attachment 1 

Page 1/1

TS-P999BH

   CBI

    CBI

                                              

                    CBI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: REESTABLISHMENT OF THE M AGISTERIAL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE 41 st JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :

:

:

: NO. 507

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

P ER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23 rd day of August 20 22 , upon consideration of the Petition to

Reestablish the Magisterial District s of the 41 st Judicial District ( Juniata and Perry

Count ies ) of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, it is hereby ORDERED AND

DECREED that the Petition, which provides for the reestablishment of the Magisterial

District s 41

- 3

- 01 and 41

- 3

- 02 within Juniata County as they currently exist, to be effective

immediately, is granted. I t is further ORDERED AND DECREED that the Petition, which

also provides for the reestablishment of the Magisterial District s 41

- 3

- 0 3, 41

- 3

- 04 and 41

-

3

- 0 5 within Perry County as they currently exist, to be effective immediately, is granted

.

Said Magisterial Districts w ill be reestablished as follows :

Magisterial District 41

- 3

- 01 Magisterial District Judge Tracy L. Powell Delaware Township Fayette Township Fermanagh Township Greenwood Township Mifflintown Borough Monroe Township Susquehanna Township Thompsontown Borough- 2

-

Magisterial District 41

- 3

- 0 2 Magisterial District Judge Jacqueline T. Leister Beale Township Lack Township Mifflin Borough Milford Township Port Royal Borough Spruce Hill Township Turbett Township Tuscarora Township Walker Township

Magisterial District 41

- 3

- 0 3 Magisterial District Judge Richard C. Gibney Duncannon Borough Marysville Borough Miller Township New Buffalo Borough Penn Township Rye Township Watts Township Wheatfield Township

Magisterial District 41

- 3

- 04 Magisterial District Judge Jeffrey J. Wood Bloomfield Borough Buffalo Township Centre Township Greenwood Township Howe Township Juniata Township Liverpool Borough Liverpool Township Millerstown Borough Newport Borough Oliver Township Tuscarora Township

Magisterial District 41

- 3

- 05 Magisterial District Judge (VACANT) Blain Borough Carroll Township Jackson Township Landisburg Borough Northeast Madison Township Saville Township Southwest Madison Township Spring Township Toboyne Township Tyrone Township
#### Meyer, Appellant, *v.*Daniel, d. b. a. Oakley Realty Co., Appellee.

(No. 30651

Decided June 26, 1946.)

*28
      *Messrs. Krusling £ Krusling,*for appellant.

*Mr. Robert F. Dreidame,*for appellee.

By the Court.

We are in accord with the Court of Appeals in its conclusion that the overruling of a motion for judgment on the pleadings is not a final order upon which an appeal may be predicated.

Counsel for appellant rely upon Section 11601, General Code, which permits judgment to be rendered when upon statements in the pleadings one party is entitled by law to judgment in his favor.

A motion for judgment on the pleadings is in the nature of a general demurrer and presents only questions of law. 31 Ohio Jurisprudence, 877, Section 286; *State, ex rel. Dunphy,*v. *Graham, Judge,*146 Ohio St., 547, 66 N. E. (2d), 321. Appeal may not be taken from the overruling of a demurrer or a motion for judgment on the pleadings unless the pleader stands on the demurrer or such motion and permits judgment to be entered against him.

The motion for judgment _ on the pleadings in the *29present case expressly reserved in plaintiff the right to go to the jury in the event that motion was overruled.

Section 12223-2, General Code, reads:

“An order affecting a substantial right in an action, when in effect it determines 'the action and prevents a judgment, * * * is a final order which may be reviewed, affirmed, modified, or reversed * *

The entry of the Court of Common Pleas in the present controversy was not a final order which determined the action, the Court of Appeals did not err in dismissing the appeal and, therefore, the judgment of that court is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Bell, Williams, Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 24.5
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint
Lionel Reilly, or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my
name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL
VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2001, to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 with respect to the registration of the common stock of Professional
Veterinary Products, Ltd., and generally to do and perform all things necessary
to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could
do if personally present.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4/th/ day of
October, 2001.

                                                /s/ Wayne E. Rychnovsky



STATE OF IOWA                             )
                                          )     ss.
COUNTY OF ADAMS                           )


         On this 4/th/ day of October, 2001, before me, a Notary Public
qualified for said County, personally came Wayne E. Rychnovsky, known to me to
be the identical person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the
execution thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.



                                                   /s/ Teresa Shepherd
                                                   Notary Public

                                                   My commission expires:
                                                   April 25, 2004
1,000 Gallon Reactor Heat Distill off Thiol 700 Kg/batch Methyl Carbitol 1400 Kg/batch Perfluoroiodide
292 Kg/batch Thiourea
338 Kg/batch 2-(2Aminoethylamino)ethanol SZ-203 = New Chemical Substance Production Flows Cleaning Flows 

# Intermediate I Process Operation Wednesday, May 05, 2010

1010 Kg/batch Thiol Material not isolated 1720 Kg/batch Still Bottoms To off site re-claimer for recovery of Iodide 330 Kg/batch Methanol To clean reactor

330 Kg/batch MeOH 1 Kg Thiol To off site incinerator1,000 Gallon Reactor Heat Filter off Salts 806 Kg/batch Water 342 Kg/batch Sodium Chloroacetate
1258 Kg/batch Ethanol

475 Kg/batch N-[3- (dimethylamino)propyl]methacrylamide SZ-203 = New Chemical Substance Production Flows Cleaning Flows 

# Intermediate II Process Operation Wednesday, May 05, 2010

1274 Kg/batch SZ-203 Intermediate Material not isolated 1132 Kg/batch Ethanol Recycled for next batch 330 Kg/batch Methanol To clean reactor

330 Kg/batch MeOH 1 Kg Betaine To off site incinerator 1274 Kg/batch SZ-203 Intermediate Material not isolated 330 Kg/batch Water1,000 Gallon Reactor Heat 320 Kg/batch Water 656 Kg/Batch Butyl Carbitol 22 Kg/batch Sodium Bicarbonate
1274 Kg/batch Betaine Intermediate (material directed transferred into vessel not isolated)
1010 Kg/batch Thiol Intermediate (material directed transferred into vessel not isolated) SZ-203 = New Chemical Substance Production Flows Cleaning Flows 

# Surface Active Agent Process Operation Wednesday, May 05, 2010

3282 Kg/batch SZ-203 Packaged into Drums 330 Kg/batch Methanol To clean reactor

330 Kg/batch MeOH 1 Kg SZ-203 To off site incinerator
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-60062

_____________________

RAYMOND PHILLIPS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JOHN F. DONNELLY, JR.;

MICHAEL C. MOORE, Attorney General,

State of Mississippi,

Respondents-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Mississippi

_________________________________________________________________

August 22, 2000

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The petition for rehearing is GRANTED to the extent that our

reference to the defendant bearing the burden should instead place

the burden on the petitioner. In all other respects, the petition

for rehearing with respect to this published opinion is DENIED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT:

___________________________

United States Circuit Judge
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE LUIS RANGEL-LEDESMA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

Nos. 05-71966 

 05-75104

Agency No. A076-842-691

MEMORANDUM*

On Petitions for Review of Orders of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated petitions for review, Jose Luis Rangel-Ledesma, a

native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”)

FILED

SEP 24 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 05-75104

removal order, and the BIA’s order denying his motion to reopen proceedings

based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen.

Maravilla-Maravilla v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 855, 857 (9th Cir. 2004) (per curiam). 

We dismiss the petition for review in No. 05-71966, and grant the petition for

review in No. 05-75104.

The BIA abused its discretion in determining that Rangel-Ledesma’s

ineffective assistance of counsel claim was not new and could have been presented

during the pendency of the appeal. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) (evidence must not

have been available to be presented “at the former hearing”); see also Bhasin v.

Gonzales, 423 F.3d 977, 987 (9th Cir. 2005) (explaining that 8 C.F.R. §

1003.2(c)(1) requires that the evidence must not have been available to be

presented at the former hearing before the IJ).

We do not address the petition for review in No. 05-71966 in light of our

disposition in No. 05-75104. 

IN NO. 05-71966: PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

IN NO. 05-75104: PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; 

REMANDED.
<PAGE>

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-21267) of Triathlon Broadcasting Company and in the related
Prospectus of our report dated April 4, 1997, except for Note 13, as to which
the date is April 25, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Triathlon Broadcasting Company included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-KSB) for the transition period from April 1, 1996 to December 31,
1996.


                                            Ernst & Young LLP


New York, New York
May 9, 1997