alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.85 MB)

Tags:PEO LS, MTVR, Marine Corps Systems Command, MCSC, MARCORSYSCOM, Program Executive Officer Land Systems, Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement 

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed December 13, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-0417

Lower Tribunal No. 18-919-A-K

________________

Olaoluwa Ogunwale,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Mark H. Jones, Judge.

Olaoluwa Ogunwale, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Richard Polin, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and HENDON and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 230/2006

of 9 February 2006         

fixing the A1 and B export refunds for fruit and vegetables (tomatoes, oranges, lemons and apples)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 35(3),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   For system A1, the refund rates, the refund application period and the scheduled quantities for the products concerned are fixed in the Annex hereto. For system B, the indicative refund rates, the licence application period and the scheduled quantities for the products concerned are fixed in the Annex hereto.

2.   The licences issued in respect of food aid as referred to in Article 16 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 (4) shall not count against the eligible quantities in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 March 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 February 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64).

(2)OJ L 268, 9.10.2001, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

(3)OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2091/2005 (OJ L 343, 24.12.2005, p. 1).

(4)OJ L 152, 24.6.2000, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1856/2005 (OJ L 297, 15.11.2005, p. 7).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 9 February 2006 fixing the export refunds on fruit and vegetables (tomatoes, oranges, lemons and apples)

----

(1)  The product codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 (OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1), as amended.

(2)  The ‘            A            ’ series destination codes are set out in Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87.

The numeric destination codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11).

The other destinations are defined as follows:

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(b) OF
THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.


13a-14(b)




| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on
    Form 10-K of the
    Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                      



| |                               
| | ------------------------------
| | /s/ GLENN J. HOLLER           
| |                               
| | Name: Glenn J. Holler         
| | Title: Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6897
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner - Appellee, versus CRAIG O. COPLEY, Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge; Alexander B. Denson, Magistrate Judge. (CA-90-47-HC-BR) Submitted: November 15, 1995 Decided: January 29, 1996 Before HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Craig O. Copley, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen Coffey Moore, Fenita Talore Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order revoking his conditional release pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 4246(f) (West 1985). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Copley , No. CA90-47-HC-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 1995). Additionally, we find that Appellant's revocation hearing was not unnecessarily delayed in violation of § 4246(f). In light of this disposit ion, we denyAppellant's Petition to Dismiss Violation of Conditional ReleaseDischarge and his Notice of Motion for an Order. In addition, Appellant's motion for an expedited appeal is moot and is dismissed for that reason. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# neia a^(3Lincy

Januar y 5,201 2 U . S . Department

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s Essential Ai r

Servic e Divisio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Attn ; Mr . Denni s J . DeVany , Chie f Essentia ] Ai r

Servic e Divisio n RE : Docke t

081-2011-010 9 Rhinelander , Wisconsi n Dea r Mr . DeVany , O n behal f o f th e Oneid aCount

y Economi c Development Corporation' s (OCEDC ) Boai' do f Directors , I as k

you t o favorabl y conside r th e proposa

l o f Grea t Lalce s Aviation , Ltd . t

o provid e essential air

transportatio n service s t o Rhinelander , Wl . Grea t Lake s Aviatio n ha s astron g histor y o f providin g reliabl e Essential Ai r Servic e s o critical t o region s lik e tha t o f norther n Wisconsi n an

dth e U.P . o f

Michiga n serve dby th e Rhinelander/Oneid aCount y Airport . OCED C i s apublic/private partnershi p fo r economi c developmen t

whos e charg e i s t

o assis t are a businesse s t o compete an dgro w i n today' s marke t

place . Continue dgrowt

h i n our internationall y competitiv e manufacturin g firms suc h a s Oldenbur g Group , Superio r Diesel , Wausa

u Paper , LaserPro , ABX , NEX , Re dArrow , Ponss e Nort h Americ aandPrintpac k

wil l b e greatl y influence db

y reliabl e ai r

servic e t o majo

r airlin e hubs . Grea

t Lake s Aviatio n will provid e tha t suppor t fo r our loca l businesses . Touris mi s th e Northwoo dregion s secon dlarges t economi c engine . Secondhom e ownershi p i n Vila s County , immediatel y nort h o f Rhinelander

by les s tha

n 4 0 miles , make s u

p 60 % o f th e housin g market

andover 80 % o f th e countie s assesse dvalue . Oneid aCount y an dVila s Count

y combine dare th e destinatio n o f tliousand s o f

secon dhomeowner s fro

mth e Minneapoli s and Chicag o markets . Grea

t Lake s Aviatio n wil l provid e thos e "weeken dwarriors " wit h a n alternativ e mean s o f

transpoitatio n muc h shorte r tha n th e five t o seven hou

r aut o commute . W e strongl y urg e you r

suppor t o f th e Grea t Lake s Aviatio n applicatio n t o provid e Essential Ai r Services ^ Rhinelander/Oneid aCount y Aiiport , Respeetfi,illy , / ' oge r A . Luce , Executiv e Directo r

P.O . Bo x 68 2 •Rhinelander . W l 5450 1 ' 71ftnfi9-911 Q ' ocedciSnewnofth.ne t * WVW/OCEDCOR G Thi s documen t i s confidentia l an d intende d solei y fo rth e us e o f th e individua l o rentit y t o whic h i t i s addressed . A s th e recipien t o 1 thi s document , an y use . dissemination , forwarding , printing , o rcopyin g o f thi s documen t i s stricU y prohibite d an d disseminatio n require s th e writte n pennissio n o f th e author .
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 15, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00189

- CV

KEN OKORIE AND LINDA OKORIE , Appellant s

V.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING , LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 13966

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 6, 2014

. On July 3
, 2014, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

Accord ingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 14-1444

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,

v. MELVIN HERNÁNDEZ-MALDONADO,
Defendant, Appellant.

**ERRATA SHEET**
The opinion of this Court issued on July 17, 2015, is amended as follows:
On page 5, line 11, "to" is inserted between "according" and "the".
On page 6, line 6, a hyphen is inserted between "120" and "month".
On page 8, line 20, "to" is inserted between "but" and "those".
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.14


AMENDMENT NO. 6
TO THE 
THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN PACIFIC COAST ENERGY COMPANY LP AND 
BREITBURN MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC


This Amendment No. 6 to the Third Amended and Restated Administrative Services Agreement, as amended (the “ASA”) by and between Pacific Coast Energy Company LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“PCEC”), and Breitburn Management Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Breitburn Management” and together with PCEC, the “Parties”), is dated as of December 22, 2015 (this “Amendment”). Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined are used as defined in the ASA.


W I T N E S S E T H


WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the ASA with respect to certain notice provisions.


NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the benefits set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


I.    AMENDMENT.  The first paragraph (and only the first paragraph) of Section 7.1 of the ASA is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following paragraph:


“The initial term of this Agreement shall be from the Effective Date through December 31, 2016; provided, however, in the event PCEC has not received the County of Santa Barbara permits required to drill at least 50% of the proposed total wells for OHREP by December 31, 2015, PCEC may terminate this Agreement effective as of June 30, 2016 by giving prior written notice to Breitburn Management of its intention to terminate this Agreement by January 31, 2016.”


II.    MISCELLANEOUS.


		
	A.
	Successors and Assigns. This Amendment shall be binding upon, and shall enure to the benefit of, each of the Parties, and their respective successors and assigns.




		
	B.
	Full Force and Effect. Except to the extent modified hereby, the ASA shall remain in full force and effect.




		
	C.
	Governing Law. This Amendment shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware (without regard to conflict of laws principles), all rights and remedies being governed by such laws.











		
	D.
	Execution in Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. 




[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.




PACIFIC COAST ENERGY COMPANY LP


By: PCEC (GP) LLC, its general partner




By:    /s/ Randall H. Breitenbach
Randall H. Breitenbach
Chief Executive Officer




BREITBURN MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC


By: Breitburn Energy Partners LP, its sole member
By: Breitburn GP LLC, its general partner




By:    /s/ Halbert S. Washburn
Halbert S. Washburn
Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,in connection with the filing of the Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd. Form 10-K/A (the“Report”) for the year ended July 31, 2004, asamended, each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toProfessional Veterinary Products, Ltd. and will be retained by Professional Veterinary Products,Ltd. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.   /s/ Lionel L. Reilly September 7, 2005Dr. Lionel L. Reilly  President/Chief Executive Officer     /s/ Neal B. Soderquist September 7, 2005Neal B. Soderquist
exv4w3wb











Exhibit 4.3(b)




Amendment to EOG Resources, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan




     WHEREAS, EOG Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted and maintains the EOG
Resources, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan, and the Board of Directors of the Company and
the shareholders of the Company, pursuant to Sections 1.4 and 9.2 of the Plan, have approved the
amendments to Section 1.1 and 1.2 of the Plan set forth below;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:



     1. Section 1.1 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to provide as
follows:




     1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this Plan is to provide Employees of the Company
and its Affiliates which adopt the Plan with an opportunity to purchase Stock of
the Company through offerings of options at a discount and thus develop a stronger
incentive to work for the continued success of the Company and its Affiliates.
Therefore, this Plan is available to all Employees of every Employer upon their
fulfilling the eligibility requirements of Section 3.1. Any Affiliate may adopt it
with the approval of the Committee by fulfilling the requirements of Section 8.1.
This Plan is sponsored by the Company. Unless terminated by the Company earlier,
the Plan will terminate on December 31, 2019.



     2. Section 1.2 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to provide as
follows:




     1.2 Share Commitment. The aggregate number of Shares authorized to be sold
pursuant to Options granted under this Plan is 2,000,000 Shares, subject to
adjustment as provided in this Section. Any Shares relating to Options that are
granted, but subsequently lapse, are canceled, or are otherwise not exercised by
the Exercise Date, shall be available for future grants of Options.




     In the event of any stock dividend, split-up, recapitalization, merger,
consolidation, combination or exchange of Shares, or the like, as a result of
which shares shall be issued in respect of the outstanding Shares, or the Shares
shall be changed into the same or a different number of the same or another class
of stock, the total number of Shares authorized to be committed to this Plan, the
number of Shares subject to each outstanding Option and the Option Price
applicable to each Option shall be appropriately adjusted by the Committee.



[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]






1









 








     AS AMENDED HEREBY, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.


Dated effective as of January 1, 2010.




	 	 	 	 	 

	 	ATTEST:

	 	 	EOG RESOURCES, INC.
	 
	 	 
	By:	 /s/ Michael P. Donaldson

	 	By:	 /s/ Patricia L. Edwards
	 	Name: Michael P. Donaldson

	 	 	Name: Patricia L. Edwards
	 	Title: Corporate Secretary

	 	 	Title: Vice President, Human Resources and Administration







2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50219 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAYMOND CARSAREZ HERRERA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-01-CR-425-ALL

-------------------- October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Raymond Carsarez Herrera appeals the sentence he received following his guilty plea conviction for distributing cocaine. He argues that he was improperly sentenced as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Specifically, he contends that the career-offender enhancement was error because his prior convictions for using a telephone to facilitate drug offenses, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843, did not qualify as predicate offenses for purposes of § 4B1.1 and that, to the extent that theNo. 02-50219 -2- Sentencing Commission authorizes the enhancement based on such convictions, it has exceeded its authority. As Herrera concedes, his argument is foreclosed. See United States v. Lightbourn , 115 F.3d 291, 293 & n.5 (5 th Cir. 1997);

see also U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 & comment. (background); U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, comment. (n.1). He raises the issue to preserve it for possible Supreme Court review. The district court’s judgment is
AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K Amendment for the yearended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Scott M. Long, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PW Eagle, Inc. andwill be retained by PW Eagle, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. 

Dated:April 28, 2006
----

| **NEVADA**                                                    | **36-4752858**                      |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.) |
|   | Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer         | ☐ |
|--------|-------------------------|---------|---------------------------|---------|
|   | Non-accelerated filer   | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☒ |

----

| 31.1   | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                     |
| 31.2   | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|   |                                                                     |
| 32     | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.         |

----

|              | MASCOTA RESOURCES CORP. |                                                      |
|-------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|              |                    |                                                      |   |
|              |                    |                                                      |   |
| November 18, 2016 | By:                     | */s/ Dale Rasmussen*                                      |   |
|              |                    | Dale Rasmussen, Principal Executive and Financial Officer |   |