alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Techprecision Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James
      G. Reindl, the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Mary Desmond, the Chief Financial
      Officer, of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief that:


(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:
                February 14, 2008
            /s/
                James G. ReindlJames
                G. ReindlChief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Mary DesmondMary
                DesmondChief
                Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 4, 2021

No. 04-21-00114-CV

Zulema GARZA,

Appellant

v.

Zulema J. GARZA, Jose Juan Garza, III, Andres Garza, Alejandro Garza, and Gabriel Garza,

Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CVK-002209-D1

Honorable Joe Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

CORRECTED

The current deadline for appellant’s brief is July 30, 2021. On July 31, 2021, appellant 

filed a document she described as an “incomplete” brief and a letter requesting a two-week 

extension of time to file the remaining portions of her brief. We construe appellant’s letter as 

both a motion for extension of time and a motion for leave to amend her brief. After 

consideration, we GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER her to file an amended brief by 

August 19, 2021. We remind appellant that pro se litigants are held to the same standards as 

licensed attorneys and are required to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, 

including the rules regarding the contents of an appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. We 

caution appellant that a brief that does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 

is subject to being stricken by this court.

 We further note that neither of appellant’s July 31, 2021 filings contain a certificate of 

service indicating appellant served those documents on appellees or their attorney. We therefore 

ORDER appellant to provide written proof by August 9, 2021 that she has served her July 31, 

2021 filings on appellees’ attorney. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(a) (“Service on a party represented 

by counsel must be made on that party’s lead counsel.”). We remind appellant that “[a]t or before 

the time of a document’s filing, the filing party must serve a copy on all parties to the 

proceeding” and “[a] document presented for filing must contain a proof of service in the form of 
either an acknowledgment of service by the person served or a certificate of service.” Id. R. 

9.5(a), (d).

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of August, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 11, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 11, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0302. PHILLIP RODRIGUEZ v. ANGEL FOSTER f/k/a ANGEL RODRIGUEZ.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

20CV2030
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 24

- 00010

- CV
IN RE Abelardo G. GONZALEZ Original Proceeding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 8, 2024

PETITION FOR WRIT OF INJUNCTION DENIED
On January 5, 2024, Abelard o Gonzalez filed a petition for a writ of injunction and a motion for emergency relief, in order to preserve this court’s jurisdiction in a related appeal styled Abelardo
G. Gonzalez v. Rosalinda Y. Gonzalez , No. 04

- 23

- 00314

- CV. On January 10, 2024, this c ourt issued a temporary injunction, prohibiting Rosalinda Gonzalez from selling, conveying, leasing, encumbering, or otherwise disposing of the real property at issue in that appeal. On March 13, 2024, that appeal was dismissed. Having resolved that appea l, we hereby lift the temporary injunction order issued in this matter and DENY the writ of injunction.
PER CURIAM
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE02898
THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 125 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 125

   For the relief of Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del Refugio 
                              Plascencia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   For the relief of Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del Refugio 
                              Plascencia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ALFREDO PLASCENCIA LOPEZ AND 
              MARIA DEL REFUGIO PLASCENCIA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Alfredo 
Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del Refugio Plascencia shall each be 
eligible for the issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of status to 
lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Alfredo Plascencia Lopez or Maria Del 
Refugio Plascencia enter the United States before the filing deadline 
specified in subsection (c), Alfredo Plascencia Lopez or Maria Del 
Refugio Plascencia, as appropriate, shall be considered to have entered 
and remained lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1255) as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall 
apply only if the application for issuance of immigrant visas or the 
application for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate fees 
within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of 
immigrant visas or permanent residence to Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and 
Maria Del Refugio Plascencia, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 
proper officer to reduce by 2, during the current or subsequent fiscal 
year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made available to 
natives of the country of birth of Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria 
Del Refugio Plascencia under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
birth of Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del Refugio Plascencia 
under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).
                                 <all>
```
[No. 37147.

Department Two.

December 5, 1963.]

#### *In the Matter of the Welfare of*Glenna May Penix (Camp). Joseph O. Camp, *Petitioner,*v. The Superior Court for Snohomish County, *Charles R. Denney, Judge, Respondent.*
      ***

*John M. Warnock,*for petitioner.

*E. Lloyd Meeds*and *Gerald R. Gates,*for respondent.

Reported in 387 P. (2d) 371.

Per Curiam.

This is a review by writ of certiorari of a juvenile court order determining Glenna May Penix (Camp) to be a dependent child pursuant to RCW 13.04.010. Rule on Appeal 57(b)(3); 61 Wn. (2d) xv.

April 23, 1963, the court heard evidence in support of the petition and announced its oral decision that Glenna May Penix (Camp) (bom January 11, 1946) was a dependent child because her parents could not control her. A written order was not entered that day because time was needed to find a “controlled setting” for her.

June 6, 1963, the order of dependency was filed without notice. A copy of the order was, however, mailed to counsel for Joseph O. Camp (to whom Glenna had been married April 12, 1963 without the consent of her parents), who had appeared at the hearing.

It is admitted that a copy of the order was delivered to the office of counsel June 10, 1963.

Rule on Appeal 57(e)(1) provides:

> “A petition for a writ must be filed in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court within fifteen (15) days after the determination in question has been made by the superior court, ...”

We assume, arguendo, that the trial court’s determination did not become effective, in so far as petitioner’s rights (if any) are concerned, until a copy of the order was furnished his counsel.

The petition for writ of certiorari (designated “Amended Petition”) was filed in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court June 26, 1963, more than 15 days after June 10, 1963.

Since this court did not acquire jurisdiction, the writ must be quashed.

It is so ordered.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S U K E T O S U R E N D R A D E S A I ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 73089 A ge nc yN os . A 070- 536- 970

A 070- 536- 969 A 070- 536- 967 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 29, 2010 ** B e f o r e : A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , an dG R A B E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . S uke t o S ur e ndr aD e s a i , and hi s f a m l y , na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of I ndi a , pe t i t i on f o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd is m is s in g th e ir ap p e a l f r o m an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s d e c i s i o n d e n y i n g th e i rap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l, an dr e lie f

u n d e rth e C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e ( “C A T ” ) .



# FI LED JU L 06 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS06- 73089 2 W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence an a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n , L i v . A s h c r o ft , 37 8 F . 3d 95 9, 96 2 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on ba s e d on i nc ons i s t e nc i e s i n the r e c or d r e gar di ng the t i m i ng and c i r c um s t anc e s of D e s a i’s b r o th e r ’s d e a th . See i d. at9 6 4 (w e are b o u n dt o accep tan ad v erse c r e di bi l i tyf

i ndi ng a s l ong a s one of the i de nt i f

i e d gr ounds i s s upport e d by subst ant i alevi dence and go es t o the heartof the pet i t i on er ’ s c l ai m ). D es ai w as prov i ded w i th an adequ at e opp ortun i ty t o exp l ai n these i ncon si st enci es , bu tfa i l ed to d o s o . See Kau r v . G on zales , 41 8 F . 3d10 61 , 10 66 -67 (9thC i r. 20 05 ). I n the abs e nc e of

c r e di bl e t e s t i m ony , D e s a i ’ s a s y l um and w i thhol di ng of r e m o v a l c la im s f

a il. Se e Fa ra h v . A s h c r o ft , 34 8 F . 3d 11 53 , 11 56 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). B e c aus e D e s a i ’ s C A T c l a i m i s ba s e d on the s a m e t e s t i m onyf ound t o be not c r e di bl e , and he poi nt s t o no othe re vi de nc e tha ts how s i ti s m or e l i ke l ythan nothe w ill b e to rtu r e din I n d ia , h is C A T c la im a ls o f a ils . Se e i d. a t1156- 57. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

Christy Windel 

Anderson Public Library 

3200 W Center Street 

Anderson, California 96007 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

November 22,2013 

Subject: Request to retain public documents at the Anderson Public Library for public 

inspection 

Dear Ms. Windel: 

Please retain the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's documents sent to you on 

November 7, 2013 at the Anderson Public for at least 90 days, rather than sixty (60) days as stated' in 

the previous letter dated November 7, 2013, for public inspection. These documents contain the 

preliminary decision for the proposed Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit for 

the expansion of the Sierra Pacific Industries facility located in Anderson, California. We have 

extended the public comment period for this preliminary decision. A copy of the public notice 

regarding the extended public comment period is enclosed. 

Please contact me at ( 415) 94 7-4156 or kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov if you have any questions. 

Enclosure 

Shaheerah Kelly, Environmen 

Air Division, Permits Office
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 124 Referred in House (RFH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 124

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2010

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                   For the relief of Shigeru Yamada.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SHIGERU YAMADA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Shigeru 
Yamada shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Shigeru Yamada enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Shigeru 
Yamada shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall 
apply only if the application for issuance of an immigrant visa or the 
application for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees not 
later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Shigeru Yamada, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or subsequent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of birth of Shigeru 
Yamada under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of birth of Shigeru 
Yamada under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).

            Passed the Senate December 3, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Frank Harrison, Chief Executive Officer of Bronco Drilling Company, Inc., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2005 |  | /s/ Frank Harrison     
|                        |  | Frank Harrison         
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

| (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| (2)    | The      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|   |
|   | Dated      this 15th      day of September, 2008.                                                                                                                    |
|   |

|                                              |   |   |                                |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/       Andrew Brodkey                     |   |   | /s/       Jas Butalia          |   |
| Name:      Andrew Brodkey                         |   |   | Name:      Jas Butalia              |   |
| Title:      President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   | Title:      Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
Exhibit
10.5


[Cantel Medical
Corp. Letterhead]


December 18, 2006


 


TO:  CRAIG A. SHELDON


Dear Craig:


This letter confirms that
the term of your Employment Agreement dated November 1, 2004 has been extended
for a one year period ending October 31, 2008.


Please acknowledge and
confirm your agreement to the extension by signing and returning a copy of this
letter to Joanna Albrecht.


 


	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ James P. Reilly

  
	
  President and CEO

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  ACKNOWLEDGED and CONFIRMED:

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ Craig A. Sheldon

  	
   

  
	
  Craig A. Sheldon
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1947-1948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-477]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLOR957000-L63100000-HD0000: HAG12-0068]


Filing of Plats of Survey: Oregon/Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described lands are 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management 
Oregon/Washington State Office, Portland, Oregon, 30 days from the date 
of this publication.

WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN

Oregon

T. 10 S., R. 1 East, accepted December 8, 2011
T. 14 S., R. 1 W., accepted December 27, 2011
T. 6 S., R. 7 W., accepted December 27, 2011
T. 37 S., R. 1 E., accepted December 27, 2011
T. 38 S., R. 4 E., accepted December 27, 2011
T. 25 S., R. 2 W., accepted December 27, 2011
T. 21 S., R. 4 W., accepted December 27, 2011

Washington

T. 17 N., R. 10 E., accepted December 27, 2011
T. 29 N., R. 36 E., accepted December 27, 2011

ADDRESSES: A copy of the plats may be obtained from the Land Office at 
the Bureau of Land Management, Oregon/Washington State Office, 333 SW. 
1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, upon

[[Page 1948]]

required payment. A person or party who wishes to protest against a 
survey must file a notice that they wish to protest (at the above 
address) with the Oregon/Washington State Director, Bureau of Land 
Management, Portland, Oregon.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Hensley, (503) 808-6124, Branch 
of Geographic Sciences, Bureau of Land Management, 333 SW. 1st Avenue, 
Portland, Oregon 97204. Persons who use a telecommunications device for 
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 
1-(800) 877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business 
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a 
message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply 
during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Before including your address, phone number, 
email address, or other personal identifying information in your 
comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including your 
personal identifying information--may be made publicly available at any 
time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal 
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we 
will be able to do so.

Timothy J. Moore,
Acting Chief, Cadastral Surveyor of Oregon/Washington.
[FR Doc. 2012-477 Filed 1-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P