2007 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
2-15-2007 

# U SA v . Gr ie r P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 05-1698

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2007 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du
. Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" U SA v . Gr ie r " (2007). 2007 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1544. h tt p://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007/1544T h is case w as origina ll y arg u ed o n O ctob er 25 , 2 0 0 5 , b ef o re Jud g es S lov it er, Fish er, * and R os enn. T he cor am w as r econs t i t ut ed t o i ncl ude C hi ef J udge Sci r i ca a ft ert he dea t h of J udge R os enn. O n J une 6, 2006, an o p inion b y a maj or i t yof t he or i gi nal panel w as fi l ed, aff i r m i ng t he D i s t r i ctC our t’ s l egal concl us i ons , butr emandi ng forr es ent enci ng, di r ect i ng t he D i s t r i ctC our tt o s t at e more ful l y i t s r eas ons fori m pos i ng t he par t i cul ars ent ence . J udge Sl ovit erfi l ed a di s s ent i ng opi ni on on t he s ame day
. A ppel l antpet i t i oned forr ehea r i ng en banc. T he C our tgr ant ed t he pet i t i on and vac at ed t he pane l ’ s j udgm entand opi ni on. Fol l ow i ng ar gum ent , J udge V an A nt w erpen t ook s eni ors t atus on O ct ober23, 2006, ** butcont i nues t o t ake pa r ti n t hi s m at t erpur s uantt o I nt er nal O per at i ng Pr ocedur e 9. 6. 4. P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT
N o. 05- 1698
UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v. S EAN M I CHAEL GRI ER,

A ppel l ant
O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e M id d le D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( D
. C
. N o. 03- cr - 00284) D i s t r i ctJ udge: H onor abl e Sy l vi a H
. R ambo
A r gued En B anc Sept ember 13, 2006 * B e f o re : S C IR IC A , C hi ef

Judge , S L OVI T E R, M c KE E , RE NDE L L , BA RR Y, AM BR O, F UE NT E S , S M I T H, F I S HE R, CH AGAR E S a n d VAN AN T WER P E N, C i r cui tJudges
. ** ( O pi ni on fi l ed Februar y5, 2007)2 OR DE R A M E ND I NG P UB L I S HE D O P I NI ON A M B R O , C i r cui tJudge

I ti s now or der ed t hatt he publ i s hed O pi ni on i n t he above cas e fi l ed F ebruary5, 20 07 , be am end ed as fo l l ow s:

I n J udge A m br o’ s opi ni on concurr i ng i n j udgm ent , page 40, t he s econd s ent ence i n t he onl yful l par agr aph on t he page , r epl ace t he w or ds “byw ay ” w i t h t he w or ds “t hr ough us e”, s o t hatt he phr as e r eads “t hr ough us e of the Feder al Sent enci ng G ui del i nes ”.
B yth e C o u rt, / s /T hom as L
. A m br o, C i r cui tJ udge
D at ed: Februar y15, 2007