Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that thi s opinion should not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 50154

UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA , P l ai n t i f f - A pp el l ee v. KEENAN M I LL ER , D efen d a n t - A p p ell a n t

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f o rt he W e s t e r n Di s t r i c to f Te xa s , Sa n Ant o ni o D ivi s i o n

B e fo r e J O L LY , D e M O S S , a n dP R A D O , C ir c u it J u d g e s : P E R C U R IA M: * K e e n a n M illera p p e a ls aco n d iti o n of su p e rv is e d r e lea se . B e ca u se of a
s u b s e q u e n t m o d ific a tio n to th e co n d itio n , h is a p p e a l is m o o t. O n F ebru ary 23, 200 9, t h e di st ri ctcou rtim posedcon di t i on s of sup ervi sed rel ease, i n cl u di n g: “ T h e defen da nts hallt ak ea ny pr o perly prescr ibedm edi cat i on andc o nt i nue t o t ak e suc h m e di c at i o n w hi l e pr e s c r ibe d bya m e di c aldo c t o ra nd
a u th o r iz e db yh is p r o b a tio n o ffic e r .” M ille ra p p e a le d

. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September

11, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 50154

2 M i l l er i s presc ribed P al i peri don e, an an t i psych ot i c m edi cat i on . H e argu es t h at th e di st ri ctcourt ’ s i n vol u n t ary m edi cat i on ord er vi ol ated h i s r i gh t s un der th e F o u r te e n th A m e n d m e n t b yfa ilin gto a ffo r dh im d u e p r o c e s s . O n Ju l y 23, t h e governm en tm ovedun opp osed u n der F e d e ra l R u l e of C ri m i n alP rocedure 32. 1(c) t o m odi f y t h e conditio n . T h e nex tday , t h e di st ri ct
c o u r t g r a n te dth e m o tio n . T h e n e w co n d itio n re a d s :

W i t h r e ga r d t o t he s upe rvi s e d- r e l e as e c o ndit i o n r e quir i ng t he D ef en d a nt ’ s par t i c i pat i on i n m ent al

- heal t h t r eat m ent , as ad m i ni st ere d b y t he pr o ba t i o n o f f i c e , t he D e fe nda nts hallt ak e m edi cat i on w h en an d as p re scribeda probati on - of f i ce- au t h ori zed m e nt al

- he alt h- t r eat m e ntpr o vi de rw ho i s am e di c aldo c t o r . Any r e q u ir e dm e d ic a t io n m u s tb e r e a s o n a b lyr e la t e dt o t h e D e fe n d a n t ’s m e nt al

- he alt h t r e at m e nt
. H o w e ve r , t he D e fe nda nt ’ s r e f us alt o t ak e ant i ps yc ho t i co rps yc ho t r o pi cm edi c at i o n pr e s c r ibe d b y s uc h a t reat m en tprovi der sha l lnot be a vi ol ati on of sup ervi sed rel ease u n l ess t h e C ou rt , af t er af f ordi n g t h e D efen da n td u e p roces s, d eterm i n es a n dord ers th a t t h e D efen d a n t sh a l lb e com p ell ed to t ak e s uc h m e di c at i o n, a nd the D e fe nda ntt he r e af t e rv i o l at e s t he C ou rt ’ s or der. The go ve r nm e ntno t i f i e d t hi s Cour t o f t he c hang e o n J ul y 27 a nd u r ge s us t o c o n s i d e rt h e a p p e a lmo o t
. Mi l l e rr e p l i e do n A u g u s t1 7 , ar g ui ngt h a twe s h o u lds till c o n s id e rth e a p p e a l. W e hol d th a t th e n e w co n d iti o n of su p e rv ise dre lea se im p o se s n o ob li g a tion on M il l er . I nst ead, i tes t abl i she s a f r am ew or k ac c or di ng t o w hi c h t he c our tm ay l aterrequi re M i l l er t o t ak e an t i psych ot i c orpsychotropi c dru g s. O n l y af t er a h eari n g af

f ordi n g M i l l er due p roces s w i l lhe be requ i red t o t ak e an y m edi cat i on a n dp o te n tia llyfa c e p u n is h m e n t fo rre f u s in gto co m p ly . M ille r ’ s a p p e a l, th e r e fo r e , is m o o t. AP P EA L DI S M I S S ED

.