alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Unilens Vision Inc. (the ompany) on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Pecora, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|Date: January 12, 2011           
|                                 
|/s/ Michael J. Pecora            
|Michael J. Pecora                
|President/Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project Nos. 14187-000, 14199-000]

On February 22, 2012, the Commission held a drawing to determine priority among competing preliminary permit applications with identical filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that none of the applicants' plans are better adapted than the others to develop, conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the region at issue, the priority established by this drawing will serve as the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order of priority is as follows:

1. Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XXXIV, Project No. 14187-000.

2. FFP Project 58, LLC, Project No. 14199-000.

Dated: February 22, 2012.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-4801 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 18 - 00026 - CV KELLY THOMAS APPELLANT
V. CARL PU GLIESE; SETH JOHNS, CMO OF CARL’ S HANDYMAN; AND CULPEPPER PLUMBI NG & AIR CONDITIONING, IN C. APPELLEES

---------- FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. CV

- 2 016

- 01764

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- This is the fourth appeal brought by appellant Kelly Thomas arising fr om her pending lawsuit against appellees Carl Pugliese, Seth Johns, and Culpepper Plumbing & Air Conditioning, Inc. As we have with her three prior appeals, we dismiss this appeal.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

In 2016, Thomas filed suit against the appellees, alleging that they had performed defective plumbing services at her home. See Thomas v. Pugliese , No . 02

- 17

- 00423

- CV, 2018 WL 547596, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Jan. 25, 2018, no pet. h.) (mem. op.) (discussing Thomas’s prior appeals against the appellees). On November 28, 20 17, the trial court granted the appellees ’ motion for sanctions against Thomas and warned that it would dismiss her claims “[i]f any [sanctions] payments are not delivered, either timely or in full” to the appellees. To date, the trial court has not dismi ssed Plaintiff’s claims. Thomas attempts to appeal this order for the second time. As we noted in our prior dismissal of Thomas’s first attempt to appeal this order, it is not a final or otherwise appealable order. See id. at *1

– 2

. We notified Thomas of our jurisdictional concerns. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. And although Thomas responded, she did not establish our jurisdiction over her attempted appeal. 2 We dismiss Thomas’s appeal for want of jurisdiction. 3 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, 43.2(f).

PER C URIAM PANEL: GABRIEL , KERR, and PITTMAN, JJ.
DELIVERED: February 8 , 2018

2 She asserted that her claims had been dismissed in the sanctions order; however, they were not.

3 Because we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal , we dismiss Thomas’s motion to transfer as moot.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RM01-5-000]

                    This is to provide notice that Commission staff has posted (at                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​etariff/​comm-order/​extend-date.pdf*) procedures that public utilities filing under Part 35 must follow if they seek to extend the date by which the Commission must act on a rate case or other statutory filing.                

Dated: February 23, 2012.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-5003 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SINCLAIR DAVIS, DC# R70885, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3266

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 25, 2018. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco 

County; Susan G. Barthle, Judge. 

Sinclair Davis, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., KELLY, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 10.1


Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China dated November 23, 2006.

	
  
Summary of the main articles
  
	
  
•
  	
  
Contract   number: NO.81101200600001989
  
	
  
•
  	
  
Loan   Principal: RMB 200 million;
  
	
  
•
  	
  
Loan term: five   years starting from the date loan is actually provided to the Company;
  
	
  
•
  	
  
Floating   interest rate: Interest rate of loan shall be the benchmark rate of RMB loans   announced by the People’s Bank of China less 10%, and shall be adjusted every   three months in accordance with the benchmark rate of Renminbi loans   announced by the People’s Bank of China;
  
	
  
•
  	
  
Purpose of   the loan is to purchase equipments and machines for the Company;
  
	
  •
  	
  
Advanced   repayment of loan needs to be approved by the Creditor;
  
	
  
•
  	
  
Breach of   contract penalties: suspension of loan un-provided, demand prepayment of loan   principal and interest before maturity; imposition of punitive interest;   compensation for the Creditor’s expenses incurred due to the Company’s breach   of contract such as lawyer’s fee, travel cost in case of litigation, etc.
  
	
  
•
  	
  
Other terms:
  
	
  
 
  	
  
i)
  	
  
This loan agreement   provides for borrowing capacity in addition to the Comprehensive Credit   Facility Agreement Of Maximum Amount No. 81001200613170001;
  
	
  
 
  	
  
ii)
  	
  
The Obligor   undertakes to pledge all its manufacturing facilities to the Creditor   immediately after the Obligor receives the land use rights certification of   the BAK Industrial Park, Kuichong Street, Shenzhen;
  
	
  
 
  	
  
iii)
  	
  
The Obligor undertakes   to pledge the machines and equipments which it buys in the future to the   Creditor immediately after the Obligor receives these machines and   equipments;
  
	
   
  	
  
iv)
  	
  
The Maximum term   of this contract is five years, starting from the date loan is actually   provided to the Company;
  
	
  
 
  	
  
v)
  	
  
This   contract is guaranteed by the Guaranty Contract NO.81901200600001462 and the   Pledge Contract NO.81902200600005528.
  





	
  
Summary of the articles omitted
  
	
  
•
  	
  
Types of the   loan
  
	
  
•
  	
  
Clearing of   the loan interest
  
	
  
•
  	
  
Condition   precedent to the drawing of the loan
  
	
  
•
  	
  
Rights and   obligations of the Obligor
  
	
  •
  	
  Rights and   obligations of the Creditor
  
	
  •
  	
  Guarantee of   the loan
  
	
  •
  	
  Dispute   settlement
  
	
  •
  	
  Validity
  
	
  •
  	
  Notes
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 60293

CECILIO MENDEZ MENDE Z ,
Petitioner

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A037

- 001

- 280

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM : *
The Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals is reviewed and its order of removal is vacated for the following reason. The record shows a full concession, by an attorney at the initial hearing, of all charges for removability made by the government in its Notice to Appear. However, both the IJ and BIA granted the removal because , by common sense, they saw the conduct of Mendez to be a crime for which he was convicted

. The

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 19, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-60293 Document: 00512877053 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2014No. 13

- 60293 government does not contend that the initial concession should affect our decision.
T he problem is that the record shows no conviction of an agg ravated felony

– or of the sexual abuse of a minor. We may know that the conduct of Mendez would support a conviction of a crime charged, but none of the statutes require violence or force or sexual abuse of a minor for conviction . T herefore,
it is not s hown that any conviction met the categorical compatibility required to justify Mendez’s deport ation

. Review GRANTED and Order of Removal VACATED

.

2 Case: 13-60293 Document: 00512877053 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/19/2014
<PAGE>
 
 
                                  EXHIBIT 21

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                          PERCENTAGE OF        STATE OF INCORPORATION
   PARENT                       SUBSIDIARY                  OWNERSHIP             OR ORGANIZATION
   ------                       ----------                -------------        ----------------------
<S>                          <C>                          <C>                  <C>   
American National            American National                  
 Bancorp, Inc.                Savings Bank, F.S.B.              100%                 Federal    

American National            American National Insurance        
 Savings Bank, F.S.B.         Agency, Inc.                      100%                 Maryland   

American National            National Development               
 Savings Bank, F.S.B.         Corporation                       100%                 Maryland   

American National            ANSB Corporation                   100%                 Delaware   
 Savings Bank, F.S.B.        

American National            Liberty Street, Inc.               100%                 Maryland   
 Savings Bank, F.S.B.         

American National            Fayette Street Realty, Inc.        100%                 Maryland   
 Savings Bank, F.S.B.         
</TABLE> 


                                     -98-
| **Exhibit 24.7**      |
|-----------------------|
|                  |
| **POWER OF ATTORNEY** |

 

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Lionel Reilly or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf  (i) to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007, and any such amendment thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (ii) to file the Annual Report on Form 10-K, any amendment thereto, and all exhibits and documents required in connection therewith the SEC, and (iii) generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of October, 2007.

 

| /s/ A. Donald Janezic, Jr. |
|----------------------------|
| A. Donald Janezic, Jr.     |

 

| STATE OF CONNECTICUT | ) |   |
|----------------------|---|--------|
|                 | ) | ss.    |
| COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD  | ) |   |

 

On this 17th day of October, 2007, before me, a Notary public qualified for said County, personally came A. Donald Janezic, Jr., known to me to be the identical person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the execution thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.

 

| /s/ Elizabeth Keily    |
|------------------------|
| Notary Public          |
| My commission expires: |

 

| October 31, 2007 |
|------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4944]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Revocation

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license has been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 
409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515, effective on 
the corresponding date shown below:

    License Number: 004621F.
    Name: Global Forwarding, Inc. dba Global Connection.
    Address: 305 Joyce Avenue, Arcadia, CA 91006.
    Date Revoked: February 10, 2012.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 016207N.
    Name: Admiral Overseas Shipping Company, Inc.
    Address: 323 South Swing Road, Greensboro, NC 27409.
    Date Revoked: January 28, 2012.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 018164N.
    Name: Cibao Cargo, Inc.
    Address: 1345 Cromwell Avenue, Bronx, NY 10452.
    Date Revoked: February 2, 2012.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 1900F.
    Name: U.S.A. Shipping Corporation.
    Address: 1890 NW 82nd Avenue, Suite 101, Miami, FL 33126.
    Date Revoked: February 4, 2012.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 020275N.
    Name: Global Tech Investments, L.L.C. dba Global Freight 
Forwarding.
    Address: 1851 Central Place South, Suite 122, Kent, WA 98030.
    Date Revoked: February 9, 2012.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 020479F.
    Name: Karon Jones dba Keene Machinery and Export.
    Address: 425 Sandy Lane, Dublin, TX 76446.
    Date Revoked: February 11, 2012.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 020527NF.
    Name: Fast Logistics, Inc.
    Address: 3350 SW 3rd Avenue, Suite 207, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33315.
    Date Revoked: February 1, 2012.
    Reason: Failed to maintain valid bonds.

    License Number: 021014N.
    Name: Magic Transport, Inc.
    Address: Pepsi Industrial Park, PR-2, KM 19.5, Interior BO 
Candelaria, Toa Baja, PR 00949.
    Date Revoked: February 2, 2012.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 021869F.
    Name: Merco Air & Ocean Cargo, Inc.
    Address: 6 Fir Way, Cooper City, FL 33026.
    Date Revoked: February 1, 2012.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

Vern W. Hill,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2012-4944 Filed 2-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1421 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 366
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1421

                          [Report No. 111-181]

 To amend section 42 of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the 
          importation and shipment of certain species of carp.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 9, 2009

Mr. Levin (for himself, Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Feingold, Mrs. 
Gillibrand, Mr. Durbin, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Casey, Mr. Brown of Ohio, and 
Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

                              May 5, 2010

               Reported by Mrs. Boxer, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 42 of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the 
          importation and shipment of certain species of carp.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Asian Carp Prevention and Control 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ADDITION OF SPECIES OF CARP TO THE LIST OF INJURIOUS SPECIES 
              THAT ARE PROHIBITED FROM BEING IMPORTED OR SHIPPED.

    Section 42(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``of the bighead carp of the species Hypophthalmichthys 
nobilis;'' after ``Dreissena polymorpha;''.
                                                       Calendar No. 366

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1421

                          [Report No. 111-181]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend section 42 of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the 
          importation and shipment of certain species of carp.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 5, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, Mark Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President, in connection with the Quarterly Report of CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: June 10, 2013
  /s/ Mark Gatto

Mark Gatto

Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President

(Principal Executive Officer)

CĪON Investment Corporation
English
Summary of Auction Confirmation Letter Relating to Land Use Rights

    


    
      
        
          	
                  Date
      of Signing:

                	 
      	
                  March
      19, 2010

                
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                  Parties:

                	 
      	
                  Actions
      Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., or Actions Technology Shanghai
      (“Winning Bidder”)

                
	 
      	 
      	
                  Shanghai
      Real Property Transaction Center (“Auctioneer”)

                
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                  Property:

                	 
      	
                  Land
      use rights of lot No. C-5-4, Middle District, Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park,
      Pudong District, Shanghai (the “Land”)

                
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                  Consideration:

                	 
      	
                  RMB61,200,000,
      which was the bid price offered by Actions Technology Shanghai and
      accepted by the Auctioneer at the auction.

                
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                  Other
      Terms:

                	 
      	
                  Actions
      Technology Shanghai shall enter into a certain land use rights purchase
      agreement with Pudong District Development and Reform Commission (the
      “Seller”) within three months from the date of signing of this letter (the
      “Effective Period).  Actions Technology Shanghai may apply in
      writing to extend the Effective Period ten days prior to the expiration of
      the Effective Period.

                
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                  In
      the event that the Winning Bidder fails to meet the bidding requirements,
      the Seller has the right to disqualify the Winning Bidder from its right
      to purchase the land use rights for the
Land.