* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii) (2001).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40316

Summary Calendar

MELVIN RAY WHITE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICKY ELLEDRIDGE, Correctional Officer III; GARY L. JOHNSON,

Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(6:00-CV-729)

August 22, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Melvin Ray White, Texas inmate #582778, appeals from the

district court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint. The court

dismissed White's complaint as frivolous and for failure to state

a claim. 12 See Siglar v. Hightower

, 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997).

3 Huds on v. McMillian , 503 U.S. 1, 9-10 (1992) (internal

quotations and citations omitted).

4 See id.

5 See Siglar , 112 F.3d at 193-94.

2 We find no error in the court's ac tions. Although White

alleged that he was verbally abused by Elledridge, verbal abuse by

a pris on official is insufficient to state a section 1983 claim. 2

M oreover, "[t]he Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and

unusual punishments necessarily excludes from constitutional

recognition de minim is u ses of physical force, provided that the

use of force is not o f a sort repugnant to the conscience of

mankind." 3 Consequently, Elledridge's alleged pushing and shoving

of White does not implicate the Eight Amendment. 4

White' s assertion of emotional harm also does not support a

section 1983 claim. Allegations of mental stress do not support a

section 1983 claim without a prior showing of physical injury. 5

White has made no such showing.

Finally, Elledridge's alleged conduct does not create the risk

of imminent future danger sufficient to generate section 1983

liability. In the absence of present physical injury, an inmate may

obtain injunctive relief under section 1983 against "sufficiently

imminent dangers" that are likely to cause harm in the "next week6 Helling v. McKinney

, 509 U.S. 25, 32-35 (1993); see also

Herman v. Holiday , 238 F.3d 660, 664-65 (5th Cir. 2001).

7 See Helling , 509 U.S. at 32-35.

8 See Bradley v. Puckett

, 157 F.3d 1022, 1025 (5th Cir. 1998);

Siglar , 112 F.3d at 193-94.

9 See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2001).

3 or month or year." 6 White alleges that Elledridge shov e d him in a

hallway, pushed him as he exited a barbershop, confiscated his

s hower bag, and verbally abused him. These allegations do not

support a section 1983 claim based on imminent harm. 7

We conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing

the complaint for failure to state a claim. Nor do we find that the

c ourt abused its discretion in dismissing the complaint a s

frivolous. 8 The district court's judgment is therefore

AFFIRMED.

Moreover, White is hereby informed that the district court's

dismissal of this action as frivolous counts as a strike for

purposes of § 1915(g). We caution White that once he accumulates

three strikes, he may not proceed IFP either in any civil action or

in any appeal of a civil action which is file d while he is

incarcerated or detaine d in any facility, unless he is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury. 9

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; THREE-STRIKES WARNING ISSUED.