alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, In connection with the filing of the Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd. Form 10-K (the Report) for the year ended July 31, 2003, each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



2. The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/    Lionel L. Reilly          
|Dr. Lionel L. Reilly             
|President/Chief Executive Officer



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/    Neal B. Soderquist
|Neal B. Soderquist       
|Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4796]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 13824-000, 13826-000]

FFP Missouri 17, LLC BOST2 Hydroelectric, LLC; Notice Announcing 
Filing Priority for Preliminary Permit Applications

    On February 22, 2012, the Commission held a drawing to determine 
priority among competing preliminary permit applications with identical 
filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that none of 
the applicants' plans are better adapted than the others to develop, 
conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the 
region at issue, the priority established by this drawing will serve as 
the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order of priority is as 
follows:
    1. BOST2 Hydroelectric, LLC, Project No. 13826-000.
    2. FFP Missouri 17, LLC, Project No. 13824-000.

    Dated: February 22, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4796 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.15 MB)

Tags:DLA Energy Pacific, RIMPAC 2016, training

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 32 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 32

  Congratulating the North Dakota State University football team for 
 winning the 2012 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I 
                Football Championship Subdivision title.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2013

   Mr. Hoeven (for himself and Ms. Heitkamp) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Congratulating the North Dakota State University football team for 
 winning the 2012 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I 
                Football Championship Subdivision title.

Whereas the North Dakota State University (referred to in this preamble as 
        ``NDSU'') Bison won the 2012 National Collegiate Athletic Association 
        (referred to in this preamble as the ``NCAA'') Division I Football 
        Championship Subdivision title game in Frisco, Texas, on January 5, 
        2013, in a hard fought victory over the Sam Houston State University 
        Bearkats by a score of 39 to 13;
Whereas the NDSU Bison and coach Craig Bohl had an incredible 2012 season with 
        14 wins and 1 defeat;
Whereas NDSU has won 10 NCAA Football Championships;
Whereas, during the championship game, the NDSU Bison offense scored 39 points 
        against the Sam Houston State Bearkats;
Whereas Coach Bohl and his staff have instilled character and confidence in the 
        NDSU players and have done an outstanding job with the Bison football 
        program;
Whereas the leadership of President Dean Bresciani and Athletic Director Gene 
        Taylor has helped bring both academic and athletic excellence to NDSU; 
        and
Whereas the 2012 NCAA Division I Football Championship Subdivision title was a 
        victory not only for the NDSU football team, but also for the entire 
        State of North Dakota: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates the North Dakota State University 
        football team, the 2012 National Collegiate Athletic 
        Association Division I Football Championship Subdivision 
        champions;
            (2) commends the North Dakota State University players, 
        coaches, and staff for their hard work and dedication; and
            (3) recognizes the students, alumni, and loyal fans for 
        supporting the Bison on their successful quest to capture 
        another Division I trophy for North Dakota State University.
                                 <all>
```
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the undersigned, Michael E. DeDomenico, Chief Executive Officer of NuCO2 Inc., a
Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to his knowledge,
that:

The Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended June 30,  2005 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                             /s/ Michael E. DeDomenico
                                             -------------------------
                                             Michael E. DeDomenico
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             September 13, 2005
```
| **Exhibit 24.4**      |
|-----------------------|
|                  |
| **POWER OF ATTORNEY** |

 

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Lionel Reilly or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006, and any such amendment thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to file any such amendment to the Form 10-K, exhibits thereto and documents required in connection therewith with the SEC, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 24th day of October, 2006.

 
| /s/ G.W. Buckaloo, Jr. |
|------------------------|
| G.W. Buckaloo, Jr.     |

 
| STATE OF MISSOURI | ) |   |
|-------------------|---|--------|
|              | ) | ss.    |
| COUNTY OF JACKSON | ) |   |

 

On this 24th day of October, 2006, before me, a Notary public qualified for said County, personally came G. W. Buckaloo, Jr., known to me to be the identical person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the execution thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.

 
| /s/ Kelli A. Brown     |
|------------------------|
| Notary Public          |
| My commission expires: |

 
| July 11, 2009 |
|---------------|
Exhibit
      31.1




CERTIFICATION




I,
      James
      G. Reindl, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
      30, 2007, of Techprecision Corporation;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated:
              November 14, 2007
            
            /s/
              James G. ReindlJames
                G. Reindl
              Chief
                Executive Officer
Appendix M

Supporting Information for:

Best Available Retrofit Technology

(BART) Rule
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                               
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         13,943,693
<SECURITIES>                                   13,827,161
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,494,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                   651,500
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               40,584,602
<PP&E>                                         4,462,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,952,363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 47,531,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,703,660
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       153,253
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,115,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   47,531,066
<SALES>                                        39,101,380
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               39,101,380
<CGS>                                          7,900,286
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  28,357,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               425,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,984,038
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,973,385
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            7,010,653
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7,010,653
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.44
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF
                             WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                 % of Securities
                                                                                                 Owned by
Name                                                          Incorporated                       Immed. Parent
----                                                          ------------                       ---------------
<S>                                                           <C>                                <C>
West Point-Pepperell Enterprises, Inc.                        Delaware                           100%
     J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc.                                 Delaware                           100%
     WestPoint Stevens (Canada) Ltd.                          Canada                             100%
     J.P. Stevens Enterprises, Inc.                           Delaware                           100%
     Alamac Holdings Inc.                                     Delaware                           100%
     Liebhardt Inc.                                           Delaware                           100%
WestPoint Stevens (Asia) Inc.                                 British Virgin Islands             100%
     WestPoint Stevens (Japan) Inc.                           Japan                              100%
WestPoint Stevens Stores Inc.                                 Georgia                            100%
WestPoint Stevens (UK) Limited                                England                            100%
     WestPoint Stevens (Europe) Limited                       England                            100%
     Lexward Properties Limited                               England                            100%
     P.J. Flower Inc.                                         New Jersey                         100%
     DPC Associates Limited                                   England & Wales                    100%
WPS Receivables Corporation                                   Delaware                           100%
WPSI Inc.                                                     Delaware                           100%
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-11195 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WALTER LEE MCGRUDER, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CR-111-P

- - - - - - - - - - August 30, 1996 Before KING, JOLLY, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Walter Lee McGruder argues that the district court misapplied the guidelines in determining that he was not entitled to an adjustment of his offense level for his minor role in the offense. We have reviewed the record, including the trial and sentencing transcripts, the presentence report and McGruder’s objections thereto, and the briefs, and find that the districtcourt’s properly applied the guidelines and did not commit clear

error in denying McGruder an adjustment for his minor role in the offense. The district court did not rely solely on the relativeculpability of McGruder in light of the acts of the coparticipants. Further, the evidence presented at trial showed that McGruder initiated the kickback scheme and remained actively involved in the scheme to obtain additional business for his company, C&A Electronics. The district court did not err in denying the adjustment to McGruder’s offense level based on his minor role in the offense. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. AFFIRMED.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2008

___________ Richland V. Reed, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Remington Arms Company, Inc.; Paul * Appeal from the United States Cahan, in his individual and official * District Court for the capacity; Roger Lynch, in his individual * Eastern District of Arkansas. and official capacity; Michael Jones, in * his individual and official capacity; * [UNPUBLISHED] Gary Boyles, in his individual and * official capacity; Kim Schroeder, in his * individual and official capacity, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 27, 1998 Filed: November 3, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.The Honorable George Howard Jr., United States Di strict Judge for the Eastern 1 District of Arkansas. -2- RichlandV. Reed appeals following a final judgment by the district court 1 dismissing his employment discrimination action. Reed argues that the court abused its discretion in refusing to enter default judgment against defendants

. Having carefully reviewed the record and t

he parties’ submissions, we find the district court did not err in refusing to enter default judgment for the reasons set f orth in its order, and we affirm the court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 10(a)



 EXHIBIT 10(a) 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional
Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 9, 2010, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, and (2) dated April 26, 2010, with respect to the financial
statements of the subaccounts of Separate Account VA – WNY, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-120125) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related Prospectus of Flexible Premium Variable
Annuity - H. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Des Moines, Iowa 
 April 26, 2010
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-69181) pertaining to the 1998 Management Incentive Plan and the
1998 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-57455) pertaining to the 12 1/2 percent Senior Discount
Debentures due 2008 of our reports dated March 14, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Thermadyne Holdings
Corporation and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-57457) pertaining to the 9 7/8 percent Senior Subordinated
Notes due 2008 of our report dated March 14, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Thermadyne Mfg. LLC, each of which are
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 28, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7247

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

TAKI MICARIO WASHINGTON, a/k/a Joey Williams, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:00-cr-00318-GBL-1) 

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009 

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Taki Micario Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Colin Christopher 

Sampson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Taki Micario Washington appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Washington, No. 1:00-cr-00318-GBL-1 (E.D. Va. filed June 17, 

2009; entered June 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED