TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00235-CV

NO. 03-10-00455-CV

NO. 03-10-00456-CV

NO. 03-10-00457-CV

NO. 03-10-00458-CV

John Stritzinger, Appellant

v.

Katherine Wright, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-04-004690, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The above-referenced causes each arise from the same district court cause, Cause No.

D-1-FM-04-004690, a suit affecting the parent-child relationship between John S. Stritzinger, III;

his ex-wife Katherine Wright; and three children of their marriage. To date, Stritzinger, who is

pro se, has filed at least five separate notices of appeal complaining of seven different district court

orders:

Appellate Cause No. District Court Order Challenged

03-10-00235-CV January 1, 2009, “Final Order in Suit

Affecting Parent-Child Relationship” 
03-10-00455-CV January 20, 2009, “Addendum to [January 1,

2009] Final Order in Suit Affecting ParentChild Relationship” 

03-10-00456-CV January 29, 2010, “Order Holding

Respondent in Contempt, Suspending

Commitment, And Order for Sanctions”

03-10-00457-CV June 9, 2010, “Order of Contempt to Coerce

Compliance” 

June 9, 2010, “Order of Contempt for

Violations of Court Order”

03-10-00458-CV July 9, 2010, “Order Granting Katherine

Wright’s Motion to Quash and for Protective

Order” 

July 21, 2010, “Order Requiring John

Stritzinger to Seek Court Approval Prior to

Requesting Issuance of a Subpoena” 

Now pending in these appellate causes are several motions. Stritzinger has filed an unopposed

motion to consolidate all five causes to the extent of having a single appellate record. He has also

filed unopposed motions to consolidate Cause Nos. 03-10-00456-CV, -00457, and -00458 for

purposes of briefing. Wright has moved to dismiss Stritzinger’s two appeals from contempt orders,

Cause Nos. 03-10-00456-CV and -00457, for want of subject-matter jurisdiction. Stritzinger has

filed a response in opposition to each dismissal motion.

Because they concern the same final order, we consolidate Cause Nos. 03-10-00235-

CV and -00455 for all purposes. The records filed in Cause No. 03-10-00235-CV shall be

transferred to Cause No. 03-10-00455-CV. The consolidated causes will proceed under the style of

Cause No. 03-10-00455-CV. Cause No. 03-10-00235-CV is dismissed.

2
Becausewe lack subject-matterjurisdiction over Stritzinger’s attempted appeals from

contempt orders, see Ex parte Williams, 690 S.W.2d 243, 243 n.1 (Tex. 1985); Metzger v. Sebek,

892 S.W.2d 20, 54-55 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, writ denied), we grant Wright’s

motions and dismiss Cause Nos. 03-10-00456-CV and -00457 for want of jurisdiction. In light of

these dismissals, we dismiss as moot Stritzinger’s motions to consolidate Cause Nos. 03-10-00456-

CV, -00457, and -00458 for briefing purposes.

We grant Stritzinger’s motion to consolidate the five causes for appellate record

purposes to the extent that the parties in Cause No. 03-10-00458-CV may rely upon the appellate

record in the consolidated Cause No. 03-10-00455-CV. We otherwise dismiss that motion as moot.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed

Filed: September 29, 2010

3