alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.95 MB)

Tags:DLA Disposition Services, Defense Logistics Agency, Blue Grass Army Depot

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,078
<INVENTORY>                                     74,406
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               188,880
<PP&E>                                         257,127
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,888
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 628,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,209
<BONDS>                                        519,302
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (45,828)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   628,048
<SALES>                                        695,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               695,148
<CGS>                                          530,310
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  530,310
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,026
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,635
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,654
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,981
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,991)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       990
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 24.8
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint
Lionel Reilly, or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my
name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL
VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2001, to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 with respect to the registration of the common stock of Professional
Veterinary Products, Ltd., and generally to do and perform all things necessary
to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could
do if personally present.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3/rd/ day of
October, 2001.

                                                /s/ Fred G. Garrison



STATE OF VIRGINIA                         )
                                          )     ss.
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX                         )


         On this 3/rd/ day of October, 2001, before me, a Notary Public
qualified for said County, personally came Fred G. Garrison, known to me to be
the identical person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the
execution thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.



                                                /s/ Roger M. Bostic
                                                Notary Public

                                                My commission expires:
                                                November 30, 2001
DEC. 20. 2010 11:33A M F -^ A REGIONAL COUNSEL, A£A- ? •- WO. 2852 P. 2/ 3 

U.S. Department liastem Region 1 Avlaiion Plaza 

of Traijsportaiion Office of Regional Counsel Room 561 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Federal Aviation Telephone: 718-553-3259 

AdmimstRition Facsimile: 718-995-5699 

DEC 2 0 2010 

Vi^ Facsimile 

Chief Adminisirativc Law Judge Ronnie A. Yodcr 

Office of Adminislrdtivc I.-aw Judges , 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

U.S. Department of Transportation ' ^ 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 'j ^ y'^ ^ 

East BuiJding Grotuid Woor S^ 5 

Room El2-320 'O '§g o 

Washington. D-C. 20590 f:9 ^^" ^ 

FAX 202-366-7536 en 

o 

"^•W^ 

j O 

Federal Aviation Adininistration (OrigiuaJ and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Cleric, AGC-430 

WilbLir Wright Buiiding - Room 2014 

FAX 202-493-5142 

Re; In tlie Matter of the Matter of Cenogcnics Coiporation 

FDMS Mo. FAA-20 10-07 86 

CP10EA0007 

Dear Chief Judge Yodcr and Hearing Docket Cleik: 

Tills is to confirm that the parties lo the above-referenced matter have reached a 

setdcment. Tlierefoie, Respondent, Cenogenics Corporation, withdraws Its reqv.iest 

for a hearing and the Complainant, FAA, vvitlidraws its complaint, 

iOO/SOO ® SWG <r VVJ StLSSGtSO S XVd G1?:G L 0L02/B3/2 L 
)EC, 20. 2&10 11:33A M F- ^ A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA- 7 - NO, 2852 P, 3/ 3 

Please feel free lo call me at (718) 553-3272 if you have any questions or 

concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jeanine C Golimer 

Attorney 

For CompIainaMt; For Respondent: 

Jeafeijie C. Gotimer IdinWBcyel j 

Attorney /Mc^'Ircij:, DjjutsSh, Mulvaiiey & 

's^cfipenLer, LLP 

Attorneys at Law 

1300 Mount Kenible Avenue 

PO Box 2075 

Monrisrown, New Jci-scy 07962-

2075 

ioo/soo® swQ <- vvj stissetsos XVd et:eL OLOS/63/S L
Cite as 2014 Ark. 373



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
No. CR-13-927

STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLANT
V.
SHAWN TREVELL RAINER APPELLEE Opinion DeliveredSeptember 11, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE MISSISSIPPI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CHICKASAWBA DISTRICT [NO. 47CR-2009-193] HONORABLE JOHN N. FOGLEMAN, JUDGE
DISSENTING OPINION ON DENIAL OF REHEARING.

JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Associate Justice I stand by my identification of the mistakes of law and fact that I noted in my dissent. The gross deviation from the previously settled standard of review, the abandonment of the most basic rules of argument preservation—that the argument be raised and ruled on by the trial court, and the application of an apparently new doctrine that this court may deny Rule 37 relief for any reason, are egregious enough to warrant a rehearing of this case. I, however, wish to note an additional reason why not rehearing this case is a grave mistake. In federal habeas corpus proceedings, our procedural default jurisprudence is granted deference. We will likely lose that deference if federal habeas defendants successfully argue that we do not apply our rules consistently. The majority in the case before us has clearly deviated from the hitherto settled way in which we have procedurally limited and barred arguments raised on appeal.Cite as 2014 Ark. 373

First, Rainer notes in his rehearing petition, it was our settled practice to require that specific arguments are made to the circuit court before we consider the same on appeal. He cites as an example Walker v. State , 301 Ark. 218, 783 S.W. 2d 44 (1990), where this court refused to consider an argument based on Arkansas Rule of Evidence 403 when the appellant had only argued relevance to the trial court. Here, the State only argued relevance, yet the majority—on its own initiative—stated that a relevancy argument automatically preserved an argument based on Arkansas Rule of Evidence 405, which concerns methods of proving
character. Second, despite the fact that it is so well settled as to be axiomatic that we will not consider an argument raised for the first time on appeal and that preservation of an issue requires a contemporaneous objection and ruling by the trial court, the majority has chosen a different path. In the case before us the State argued to exclude evidence under Rules 402 and 404, and never broached the subject of applicability of Rule 405. Accordingly, the trial court never ruled on a Rule 405 argument. The majority’s contention that it was “readily apparent” is simply not based on law or fact. As Rainer points out, this court is bound to consider only the arguments actually raised to and ruled on by the trial court or risk jeopardizing the entirety of our procedural default law and the deference its entitled to in federal habeas because the State is getting special consideration that we have never afforded
a criminal defendant.
H ANNAH , C.J., and B AKER , J., join.

2
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,475-01

EX PARTE DEREK DAVID ELMS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. A-35,489-A IN THE 70TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM ECTOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant pleaded guilty to capital murder in exchange for a sentence of life imprisonment. 

He did not appeal his conviction. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the

county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC.

art. 11.07.

The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, recommending that relief be

denied. This Court adopts the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, with the

exception of finding of fact number 5. Based on the trial court’s other findings and conclusions and

this Court’s independent review of the entire record, relief is denied. 
2

Filed: August 19, 2020

Do not publish
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00271

- CV

Pedison USA, Inc. and Dickson

Ewemade

v.

CNC Construction Inc. §

§

§

§ From the 48th District Court

of Tarrant County (048

- 263530

- 13)

November 23, 2016

Opinion by Justice Walker



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Sue Walker

__________ ____ Justice Sue Walker
May II, 2015 

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11067 issued pursuant to Section 333 ofthe FAA 

Reform Act and Part II of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket 

No. FAA-2014-0357. 

Dear Sir or Madam; 

Pictorvision Inc. was issued an Exemption numbered II 067 (hereinafter the Exemption) 

for the purpose of conducting scripted. closed-set filming for the motion picture and television 

industry. Pictorvision Inc. herby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow 3 additional 

models of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies with the conditions of the 

Exemption, and to also allow the use of all their UAS systems for Aerial Data Collection. 

Pictorvision Inc. wishes to operate three additional variations of the sUAS (models number 

PV-HL 3, DJI Phantom 2, and DJI Phantom 3) under the same terms and conditions contained in the 

Exemption. Attached hereto, and submitted as a confidential document, is the Flight Operations and 

Procedures Manual (FOPM) for the additional UAS. All operations of the additional UAS will be 

in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption. 

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for the addition of3 similar models of 

unmanned aerial vehicle and to allow Aerial Data Collection, Pictorvision Inc. respectfully submits 

that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the 

requested amendment. 

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an 

amendment to the Exemption. 

Jfm\. 

Tom Hallman 

President Pictorvision Inc . 

818-785-9282 

cc: 

James Williams 

Robert Pappas 

Jake Troutman 

16238 Rdymer Street. Van Nuys, California 9 H06 

P: 818.785.9282 F: 81 B. 785.9787 www. Pictu1 vision.com
**Exhibit 10.52**

 

REVOLVING NOTE 

 

 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED,the undersigned, (hereinafter “Co-Borrowers”), hereby, jointly and severally, PROMISES TO PAY to the order of THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC. (“Lender”), or its registered assigns, at the principal office of Fleet CapitalCorporation, as agent for such Lender, or at such other place in the United States of America as the holder of this Note may designate from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately available funds,the principal amount of TWENTY-FIVE MILLION DOLLARS ($25,000,000.00) or such lesser principal amount as may be outstanding pursuant to the Loan Agreement (as hereinafter defined) with respect to the Revolving Credit Loan, together with interest onthe unpaid principal amount of this Note outstanding from time to time. 

 

This Note is one of the Revolving Credit Notes referred to in, and issued pursuant to, that certain Fourth Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of October     , 2004, by and amongCo-Borrowers, the lender signatories thereto (including Lender) and Fleet Capital Corporation (“Fleet”), as agent for such Lenders (Fleet in such capacity “Agent”) (hereinafter amended from time to time, the “LoanAgreement”), and is entitled to the benefit and security of the Loan Agreement. All of the terms, covenants and conditions of the Loan Agreement and the Security Documents are hereby made a part of this Note and are deemed incorporated hereinin full. All capitalized terms herein, unless otherwise specifically defined in this Note, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Loan Agreement. 

 

The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be payable in the amounts and on the dates specified in the Loan Agreement and, if notsooner paid in full, on October     , 2009, unless the term hereof is extended in accordance with the Loan Agreement. Interest thereon shall be paid until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest rates and atsuch times as are specified in the Loan Agreement. 

 

Upon andafter the occurrence, and during the continuation, of an Event of Default, this Note shall or may, as provided in the Loan Agreement, become or be declared immediately due and payable. 

 

The right to receive principal of, and stated interest on, this Note may only be transferred in accordance with theprovisions of the Loan Agreement. 

 

Demand, presentment, protestand notice of nonpayment and protest are hereby waived by Co-Borrowers. 

 

***Revolving Note Signature Page***

 

This Note shall be interpreted, governed by, and construed in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of Illinois.

 
**PW EAGLE, INC.**, a Minnesota corporation and successor by merger to Extrusion Technologies, Inc.By: 
/s/ Dobson West
  Name: 
Dobson West
  Title: 
Secretary
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.1 MB)

Tags:CFC, combined federal campaign

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 11594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4714]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Type: Quarterly meeting.

Date and Time: March 9, 2012, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

Location: 1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036.

Status: The meeting on March 9 will be open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: The agenda for the board meeting includes an 
update on the Council's various reports including the annual progress 
report, a discussion on several funding proposals including a project 
focused on the subminimum wage and competitive integrated employment, a 
public comment session, a presentation by Peter Blanck, Chairman of the 
Burton Blatt Institute at Syracuse University, to provide an update on 
emerging issues in regards to disability law, policy, and research such 
as equal access to technology and opportunities for competitive 
integrated employment and other items to be determined. A public 
comment session will be held on Friday, March 9, 2012 from 1:30 p.m. 
until 2 p.m.
    Interested parties may join the meeting in a listening-only 
capacity (with the exception of the public comment period) using the 
following call-in information: Call-in number: 888-428-9505. The 
passcode is ``NCD Meeting.'' Written comments on disability-related 
issues of concern or interest may be mailed to NCD's office at 1331 F 
Street NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004 or faxed to the NCD office 
at (202) 272-2022. Comments may also be emailed to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#93c3e6f1fffaf0d0fcfefef6fde7d3fdf0f7bdf4fce5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8f8ddcac4c1cbebc7c5c5cdc6dce8c6cbcc86cfc7de">[email protected]</span></a> at any time.

Contact Person for more Information: Lawrence Carter-Long, NCD, 1331 F 
Street NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004; 202-272-2004 (V), 202-272-
2074 (TTY).

Accommodations: Those who plan to attend and require accommodations 
should notify NCD as soon as possible to allow time to make 
arrangements.

    Dated: February 23, 2012.
Aaron Bishop,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-4714 Filed 2-23-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>