alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      31.1




CERTIFICATION




I,
      James
      G. Reindl, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended December
      31,
      2006, of Techprecision Corporation;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible
      for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
      in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
      have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have
      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
      financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
      registrant’s board of directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated:
                June 13, 2007
              
              /s/ James
                G.
                ReindlJames
                G. ReindlChief
                  Executive Officer
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

SANDRA FOSTER and WILLIAM FOSTER, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

UNPUBLISHED 

February 16, 2017 

v No. 328283 

Monroe Circuit Court 

M & H PARTY STORE, INC., LC No. 14-036470-NI 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

Before: STEPHENS, P.J., and SAAD and METER, JJ. 

STEPHENS, P.J. (Concurring). 

 I adopt the reasoning of Quinto v Woodward Detroit CVS, 305 Mich App 73; 850 NW2d 

642 (2014), disapproving Kennedy’s1 application of the open and obvious doctrine to 

shopkeepers. However, the trial court here based its ruling not on whether the puddle was open 

and obvious, but on a finding that defendant met its duty to warn invitees by posting wet-floor 

signs. Plaintiffs’ argument that the continuous placement of the signs was a special aspect was 

an indirect assertion that the warnings were inadequate or ineffective. I agree with the majority 

that this argument was not well developed or supported by material facts or citation. I write 

separately only to note that the clear liquid was not open or obvious and that the adequacy of 

warnings in such circumstances, when supported by competent evidence, can defeat a motion 

brought under MCR 2.116 (C)(8) and (10). Such was not the case here. 

/s/ Cynthia Diane Stephens 

 

1 Kennedy v Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, 274 Mich App 710; 737 NW2d 179 (2007).
Ron. Tom &Berry, Member 

Stafe Board of Control 

Opinion MO. a182 

.kustln, Texas Ret E’umbase of Plc!nap truuk 

D%ar sire 

Your letter of Gatober jl asks th%s department 

whether a coupe pickup truck may be mchased by you at a 

e 

ride exoeedlng $7~.00 (ticludlng the trade-in value of 

he used ear) und,er the provisions of Section 2, subaectlon 

X4, General Prwlsions, Senate Bill 423, Aots Regular Sesa%cm 47th Legislature, reading as followsr 

n(l4) Uurcbase of passenger ears. Moo 

moneys herein approprlatsd shall be spent for 

the purehuae of a passenger ear in excess f9r 

Sevsn QWred P’lfty ($750.00) Dollars, including 

the frade-in velue of t&e used ear, and t&r 

UrLted pr%ce shall cwer a aar equi.p ed rlth 

and extra rim or wheel but LIQ e an extra 

or ‘tube.” 

7th advise that the .picSuxp ?XW@ 5s aonticted 

exaotly like a passenger soUpa with the *xnexptitm that it 

paG%&trdk body behin&the seat ratker than the 

Bfi 

You alsa advise thag *heha Chrwliet ~truek 

& a book as w& as the automobIle dealer* P market record, 

elasiaify <ha plekup as a commercial motor TehlCle~. 

Under the above r3.d~~ it is oux spfnicm that the 

queetlon whether the automoblle iwofved im a ~npaarenger ear” 

is to be determIned by condderirrg its desiga and~ean&ru~lon. 

XX it; is derigned and construeted by the.. msnuf’acturer for the 

prtmary use of oqrrylng paasengeirs It is. ‘8 “passengBF aarm, 

and within the rUer; if if ‘ie dedgned ‘and aaostr~ted for the 

~pr%mary purpose of transporting property, it Ir not tiWi.n the 

ridur q-ted. 

The pickup coupe debaribedl we balim, $8 clearlp 

designed and constructed priBlerri1 fog! ‘use ln trans@ing 

property; hence it is not wI.th3.n f he ri.der. 

we awnate that the .mh%de is to be used ~OZ tha 

pose far whioh It la deslaed. We da not meen to etV&ViSt tE- 
Ron. TomDeBerry-Page2 

the above, rider may be evaded by pnrchas3ng a vehiole designed and construeted primarily for the pUrpoae of tramportiag property, with~the purpose to use the veh.%klexclusfvuly for the $mnsportatlon of passengers. 

We return to you herewith the emlosnres appended 

to your letter of request.. 

Yours very truly 

Al'TORHJ3YGElfEiUL OF!CIiXkS 

By /s/ B. W. Falmblld 

R. W. FalrcMld, Assistant
<TABLE>
                                                                          EXHIBIT 11.1


                           BEI MEDICAL SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC.

                           COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<CAPTION>
                                                           YEAR ENDED
                                          September 27,   September 28,  September 30,
(in thousands except per share amounts)            1997           1996           1995
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                               <C>            <C>            <C>  
Weighted average shares outstanding               7,033          6,926          6,759
                                                                           
Net effect of dilutive stock options                                       
    based on the treasury stock method                                     
    using fair market value                         170            182           --
                                                -------------------------------------
                                                                           
Total weighted average shares                     7,203          7,108          6,759
    outstanding                                                            
                                                =====================================
                                                                           
Net income                                      $   235        $ 1,889        $(4,391)
                                                -------------------------------------
                                                                           
Earnings per common share and common                                       
    equivalent share                            $  0.03        $  0.27        $ (0.65)
                                                =====================================
                                                                           
                                                                     
</TABLE>
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 520/2006

of 30 March 2006         

fixing the production refund on white sugar used in the chemical industry for the period from 1 to 30 April 2006         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the fifth indent of Article 7(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The production refund on white sugar referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1265/2001 shall be equal to 23,731 EUR/100 kg net for the period from 1 to 30 April 2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 63.

----
**EXHIBIT 32****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, in connection with the filing of the Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd. Form 10-K (the“Report”) for the year ended July 31, 2005, each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toProfessional Veterinary Products, Ltd. and will be retained by Professional Veterinary Products,Ltd. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.   /s/ Dr. Lionel L. Reilly October 27, 2005 Dr. Lionel L. Reilly  President/Chief Executive Officer        /s/ Neal B. Soderquist October 27, 2005 Neal B. Soderquist  Chief Financial Officer and Vice President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-4439

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMIE JOHN SALOMON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CR-99-160) Submitted: December 29, 2000 Decided: January 18, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary Lou Newberger, Acting Federal Public Defender, Edward H. Weis, First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, John H. Tinney, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Jamie John Salomon appeals his conviction and resulting fiftyone month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2) (1994). He assertsthat the trial court erred in instructing the jury that the Government could prove interstate commerce nexus by establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the firearm in question had at any time traveled across state lines. We find no error in the court’s jury instructions. See United States v. Crump , 120 F.3d 462, 466(4th Cir. 1997). We therefore affirm Salomon’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legalcontentions of the parties are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Interstate Land Investors II Limited
Partnership (the "Registrant"), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, James Christopher Boone, General Partner and Principal
Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Registrant.

                                         By: /s/ James Christopher Boone
                                             -----------------------------------

                                             James Christopher Boone
                                             President
                                             ISC Realty Corporation,
                                             General Partner and
                                             Principal Financial Officer
                                             of the Registrant

                                             April 15, 2005
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1450 

To enable State homes to furnish nursing home care to parents any of 

whose children died while serving in the Armed Forces. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2009 

Mr. ENSIGN (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To enable State homes to furnish nursing home care to 

parents any of whose children died while serving in the 

Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF STATE HOME CARE FOR PAR4 ENTS OF VETERANS WHO DIED WHILE SERV5 ING IN ARMED FORCES. 

6 In administering section 51.210(d) of title 38, Code 

7 of Federal Regulations, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

8 shall permit a State home to provide services to, in addi9 tion to non-veterans described in such subsection, a nonmstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1450 IS

1 veteran any of whose children died while serving in the 

2 Armed Forces. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
exv10w33



 





Exhibit 10.33




ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

PERFORMANCE SHARE AGREEMENT

2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN



The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of ABM Industries Incorporated has approved a
grant to you (the “Grantee”) of Performance Share Equivalents (“PSs”) pursuant to the ABM
Industries Incorporated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), as described below.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Grantee Name:

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Number of PSs Granted:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Date of Grant:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Performance Date:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 




Performance Share Settlement: Provided you continue to provide services to the Company or any
subsidiary or parent of the Company through the applicable Performance Date, the PSs will become
vested and paid out in accordance with the performance objectives, performance period, and other
terms set forth on Attachment 1 hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. Unvested PSs
may be subject to forfeiture if you terminate employment before the vesting date, as set forth in
the Plan and the Statement of Terms and Conditions attached hereto.



The Plan and the Statement of Terms and Conditions are incorporated herein by reference.
Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan or in the
Statement of Terms and Conditions, as applicable.



The Grantee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, the Statement of Terms and Conditions and
the Plan Prospectus, represents that the Grantee has carefully read and is familiar with their
provisions, and hereby accepts the PSs subject to all of their terms and conditions. The Grantee
acknowledges that there may be adverse tax consequences upon settlement of the PSs or disposition
of the shares, if any, received in connection therewith and that Grantee should consult a tax
adviser prior to such settlement or disposition.



By their signatures below, the Company and the Grantee agree that the PSs are granted under and
governed by this Performance Share Agreement and by the provisions of the Plan and the Statement of
Terms and Conditions attached hereto.



Please sign your name in the space provided below on this Performance Share Agreement and return an
executed copy to Sandra Briggs, ABM Industries Incorporated, 160 Pacific Ave., Ste. 222, San
Francisco, CA 94111.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED	 	GRANTEE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Henrik C. Slipsager	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	President & Chief Executive Officer	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	 	 	 	 	Date:	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 





ATTACHMENTS:




2006 Equity Incentive Plan

Statement of Terms and Conditions

Prospectus
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 2, 1997 and the Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the year ended January 2, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-2-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-2-1997
<CASH>                                          44,131
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,261
<INVENTORY>                                      7,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,320
<PP&E>                                       1,163,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                 236,563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,119,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,238
<BONDS>                                        527,006
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,022
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           489
<OTHER-SE>                                     438,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,119,582
<SALES>                                         55,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               777,472
<CGS>                                           53,668
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  415,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,892
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,733
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (22,699)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,639
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,639
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        

</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1444 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the meaning of ‘‘combat 

with the enemy’’ for purposes of service-connection of disabilities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2009 

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the meaning of ‘‘combat with the enemy’’ for purposes of serviceconnection of disabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Compensation Owed 

5 for Mental Health Based on Activities in Theater Post6 traumatic Stress Disorder Act’’ or the ‘‘COMBAT PTSD 

7 Act’’. 


jbell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1444 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF MEANING OF ‘‘COMBAT WITH 

2 THE ENEMY’’ FOR PURPOSES OF SERVICE3 CONNECTION OF DISABILITIES. 

4 (a) CLARIFICATION.—Section 1154(b) of title 38, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘In the case’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

7 In the case’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2) For the purposes of this subsection, the term 

11 ‘combat with the enemy’ includes service on active duty— 

12 ‘‘(A) in a theater of combat operations (as de13 termined by the Secretary in consultation with the 

14 Secretary of Defense) during a period of war; or 

15 ‘‘(B) in combat against a hostile force during a 

16 period of hostilities.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (2) of subsection 

18 (b) of section 1154 of title 38, United States Code, as 

19 added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to a claim 

20 for disability compensation under chapter 11 of such title 

21 pending on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS