alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, James S. Quarforth, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238: 34-47986 Section III-E.];

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting and

5. The Registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 10, 2007



/s/ James S. QuarforthJames S. QuarforthChief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Martin, Michael (OST) v. __ I _

Tuesday, November OS,2013 4:08 PM

Frazier, Gregory (OSn - .J -:; P l:: 3 \

Paluvai, Venkatesh.CTR (OST); Jennifer Seale QseaJe@flygreatiakes.com); Schlemmer,

Kevin (OST)

Authorization for payment of cancelled Great Lakes flights at Page, Arizona

AIRPORT CLOSURELETTERlO.J.13.pdf

Subject:

Attachments:

Martin, Michael (OSn

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Greg,

This e-mail serves as approval from EASto pay Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. for flights not operated at Page, Arizona, due to

runway construction from October 23, 2013, through October 27, 2013. J have attached a letter from the Page

Municipal Airport detailing the reason for the airport runway closure. Obviously, Great Lakes had no control over this

and we see no reason to deny them compensation. We authorize Great Lakes to be compensated per the payout as

listed in Order 2013-6-1, Page 2 of Appendix C.

Please contact me if have questions or need additional clarification.

Regards,

Michael Martin

United States Department of Transportation

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP)

(202) 366-6494

1
October 7, 2013

American Aviation

Avis Car Rental

Classic Helicopters

Grand Canyon Airlines

Great Lakes Airlines

National Park Services

Page Jet Center

Amangiri Resort

Salt River Project

Navajo Nation Air Ambulance

Page Banner Hospital

TSA

Airport Tenants and Users

A R I ZONA

THE CENTER OF CANYON COUNTRY

Re: Page Municipal Airport Runway Overlay - October 2013

Good Monday morning,

On March 14, 2013, I wrote you regarding a "runway overlay" project which was

scheduled to be completed in May 2013. Because of the Highway 89 collapse, ADOT

Aeronautical had to re-bid the project. The City of Page was notified last week that the

overlay must be completed in October 2013; since ADOT grant money is funding the

majority of the project, the City would like your help in making this project possible.

A pre-construction meeting was held on Thursday, October 3, 2013, and the

following schedule was adopted:

The runway will be CLOSED during the EVENINGS of October 16-17, from 8:00

PM until 6:00 AM (each evening), for preparation and crack sealing.

2013.

Both day and night operations may be conducted from October 18 through 22,

The runway will be CLOSED at 6:00 AM on Wednesday, October 23, 2013, and

will REMAIN CLOSED until 8:00 PM on Sunday, October 27, 2013. AN EXTENSION

OF THE CLOSURE MAY BE NECESSARY IF LOCAL WEATHER PROHIBITS

UNINTERRUPTED RECONSTRUCTION.

A brief closure on Monday, November 25, 2013, will be required for painting.

Expect further details in November.

The City of Page thanks you for your assistance and patience. Every effort has

been made to mitigate closures for this essential project.

City of Page

Po. Box 1180 • 697 Vista Avenue

Page, Arizona 86040

(928) 645-8861 • Fax (928) 645-4244
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at

(928) 645-4240.

Cc; Mayor Diak

City Council

Page Airport Board
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT YINGJI JIN, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 13-71909 Age n c y No. A099-443-683 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d De c e m

be r 9, 2015 ** B e fore : W ALLAC E, R AW LINSON, a

n d IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s. Yingji Jin, a

native and c itiz e n of C hina , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m i gration Appe a l s ’ orde r dism issing he r a ppe a l from

an im m igrat ion judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing he r a pplic ation for a sy lum

and withholding of re

m o va l. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e 

# FIL ED DEC 15 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, Re n v . Holde r , 648 F.3d 1079, 1083 (9th C ir. 2011),

and de novo dueproc e ss c la im s, Ze tino v . Holde r , 622 F.3d 1007, 1011 (9th C ir. 2010). W e de ny

the pe tition for re vie w. W ith re spe c t to a sy lum

and withholding of re

m ova l, substa

ntia l e vide nc e supports the

a ge nc y ’ s de te rm ination tha t Jin fa ile d to c a

rry he r burde n of proving e ligibility for a sy lum

and withholding of re

m ova l. The a ge nc y

did not e rr in c onc luding tha

t Jin fa ile d

to c orroborate he r te s tim o ny with re a sona bly obta ina

ble e vide nc e . Se e 8 U.S.C . § 1252(b)(4) (“ No c ourt sha l l re ve rse a

de te rm ination m a de by a trie r of fa c t with re spe c t to theava i la bility of c orroborating e v ide nc e . . . unle ss the c ourt finds . . . tha t a re a sona ble trie r of fa c t is c o m

pe lle d to c o nc lude that suc h c orroborat ing e vide n c e is una va ila ble . ” ); Ade n v . Holde r , 589 F.3d 1040, 1044-45 (9th C ir. 2009) (IJ m ay re q uire re a sona

bly obta ina ble c orroborat ion). The re c o rd doe s not support Jin’ s due proc e ss c onte ntion tha t the IJ did not provide

he r an opportunity to e xpla in the la c k of e vide nc e . Se e Lata v . IN S , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th C ir. 2000) (re quiring e rror to pre va il on a due proc e ss c la im ). Fina lly , the l e tte rs Jin submitte d a long with the re st of the e vide nc e in the re c ord doe s not c om pe l the c onc lusion tha

t Jin m e t he r burde n of proof. Se e Re n v . Holde r ,

2 1 3 - 7 1 9 0 9648 F.3d 1079, 1094 (9th C ir. 2011). Thus, Jin’ s a sy l um and withholding of re m ova l c la im s fa i l. Se e id . PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

3 1 3 - 7 1 9 0 9
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications



I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer of ATVRockN, a Nevada Company (the “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended November 30, 2014 and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(“Form 10-Q”).



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ATVRockN (the “Company”) certifies
to his knowledge that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2014 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | The information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                                   



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|Hal B. Heyer, M.D.                                             
|Hal B. Heyer, M.D.                                             
|Principal Executive Officer
        Principal Financial Officer
|                                                               
|Date:  January 13, 2015                                        
|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0047 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TAMARA L CHAMBERLAIN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 30 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 22 2023

09/22/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0047
Exhibit 32.1**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,each of the undersigned officers of InferX Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2006 (the “Form10-QSB”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/   B.K. Gogia  Date: November 14, 2006  B.K. Gogia    Chief Executive Officer         /s/   Scott B. Parliament  Date: November 14, 2006  Scott B. Parliament    Chief Financial Officer  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as a separatedisclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 24.2
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


        KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint
Lionel Reilly, or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my
name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL
VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2000, to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 with respect to the registration of the common stock of Professional
Veterinary Products, Ltd., and generally to do and perform all things necessary
to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could
do if personally present.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of October,
2000.



                                                   /s/ Russ R. Weston



STATE OF ILLINOIS                           )
                                            )      ss.
COUNTY OF STEPHENSON                        )


        On this 6th day of October, 2000, before me, a Notary Public qualified
for said County, personally came Russ R. Weston, known to me to be the identical
person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the execution
thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.




                                                    /s/ Sherry L. Brinker
                                                    Notary Public

                                                    My commission expires:
                                                    May 14, 2001
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ATI Jet Sales, LLC

. ,

Appellant

,

City of El Paso, Texas and Maria O.

Pasillas, Tax Assessor

- Collector, City of

El Paso

,

Appellee s

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 2 1

- 00 208

- C V

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 6

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 202 1DCV1168 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ee ’s third motion for extension of time within which to file

the brief until Decemb er 12 , 202 2

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE THE APPE LLEE ’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jose Padilla , the Appell ee ’ s attorney, prepare the

Appell ee ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before December 12 , 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5 th day o f December , 202 2

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox , and Alley , JJ.
NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
              1996 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB/A (Amendment No.1)
                                    Exhibits



Exhibit 21.01

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

     Tanknology/NDE   Corporation,  a  Delaware  corporation,   incorporated  on
December 27, 1991, is a wholly owned subsidiary of NDE Environmental Corporation
and does business under the name Tanknology/NDE Corporation.

     NDE Environmental  Canada  Corporation,  incorporated on May 21, 1993 under
the Business  Corporations  Act of Alberta,  is a wholly owned subsidiary of NDE
Environmental  Corporation  and does business  under the name NDE  Environmental
Canada Corporation.

     ProEco,  Inc.,  a  Delaware  corporation,   incorporated  as  Tank  Testing
International,  Inc. on March 19, 1990, changed its name to ProEco, Inc. on July
26, 1991, and is a wholly owned subsidiary of NDE Environmental  Corporation and
does business under the name ProEco, Inc.

     EcoAm,  Inc., a Florida  corporation,  incorporated  on July 15, 1991, is a
wholly owned subsidiary of NDE Environmental Corporation and does business under
the name EcoAm, Inc.

     ProEco,  Ltd., a United Kingdom  corporation,  incorporated  in October 16,
1992,  as  EcoAm,  Ltd.,  is a  wholly  owned  subsidiary  of NDE  Environmental
Corporation and does business under the name ProEco, Ltd.

     Tanknology Canada (1988) Inc., incorporated in Ontario, Canada, is a wholly
owned  subsidiary of NDE  Environmental  Corporation and does business under the
name Tanknology Canada (1988) Inc.

     USTMAN Industries,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation,  incorporated on May 29,
1992, is a wholly owned  subsidiary of NDE  Environmental  Corporation  and does
business under the name USTMAN Industries, Inc.
exv4w4



 





Exhibit
4.4




AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO

THE SANTARUS, INC.

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN




     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE SANTARUS, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED 2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARD
PLAN (this “Amendment”), dated as of January 1, 2007, is made and adopted by SANTARUS, INC., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan (as defined below).



RECITALS




     WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Santarus, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive
Award Plan (the “Plan”);



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan as set forth below;



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 14.1 of the Plan, the Plan may be amended by the Board of
Directors of the Company; and



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has approved this Amendment pursuant to
resolutions adopted effective January 1, 2007.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Company hereby amends the Plan as
follows:



     1. Section 2.1(n) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:



          “(n) “Fair Market Value” shall mean, as of any date, the value of Stock determined as
follows:




               (1) If the Stock is listed on any established stock exchange, its Fair Market Value shall be
the closing sales price for such stock (or the closing bid, if no sales were reported) as quoted on
such exchange on the date of determination (or the most recent preceding day on which sales were
reported if none were reported on such date), as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other
source as the Committee deems reliable;



               (2) If the Stock is regularly quoted by a recognized securities dealer but selling prices are
not reported, its Fair Market Value shall be the mean of the closing bid and asked prices for the
Stock on the date of determination (or the most recent preceding day on which bid and asked prices
were reported if none were reported on such date), as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such
other source as the Committee deems reliable; or



               (3) In the absence of an established market for the Stock, the Fair Market Value thereof shall
be determined in good faith by the Committee.



     2. This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan. All
other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged except as specifically modified
herein. The Plan, as amended by this Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed.



 









 





     I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors
of Santarus, Inc. effective as of January 1, 2007.



	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	/s/ Debra P. Crawford	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Debra P. Crawford	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	SVP, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Secretary	 






2
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

THOMAS STINE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

____________________

2010-5125

______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 08-CV-0063, Ju dge George W. Miller.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

M ICHAEL D.J. E ISENBERG , Law Office of Michael D.J.Eisenberg, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffappellant.

J OHN S. G ROAT , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department ofJustice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendantappellee. With him on the brief were T ONY W EST
, Assistant Attorney General, J EANNE E. D AVIDSON
, Director, and K IRK T. M ANHARDT , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was K ATHLEEN L. K ADLEC , United States Department of the Navy, of Washington, DC.______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (R ADER
, Chief Judge, L INN and O’M ALLEY
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 12, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

AXS-One Inc.:

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-11681,333-49733, 333-61125, 333-72142, 333-72138 and 333-119327) on Form S-8 and(Nos. 333-49731 and 333-115145) on Form S-3 of AXS-One Inc. ofour report dated March 30, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balancesheets of AXS-One Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensiveincome (loss), stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for each of the years inthe three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and our report dated March 30,2005 on the related consolidated financial statement schedule, which reportsappear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K ofAXS-One Inc.

 

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP             |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
|                     |   |
|                     |   |
| Short Hills, New  Jersey |   |
| March 30, 2005      |   |

 

----