alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | [ X ] | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|--------|-------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | [   ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|--------|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| None                | None                                      |

| UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST(Title of Class)      |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

| (b)   | Exhibits |
|-----------------|----------|

| 31.1   | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 31.2   | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 32.1   | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 32.2   | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Richard C. Larson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 ofWauwatosa Holdings, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 1, 2006      /s/ Richard C. Larson   Richard C. Larson  Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32 .01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Microelectronics Technology Company (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"),

I, Brian Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial  condition  and result of  operations of
the Company.

  /s/ Brian Stewart
     Brian Stewart
Chief Executive Officer

May 12, 2010














EXHIBIT 32 .02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Microelectronics Technology Company., (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"),

I, Michael Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial  condition  and result of  operations of
the Company.

/s/ Michael Lee
   Michael Lee
Chief Financial Officer

May 12, 2010
| **Exhibit 24.1**      |
|-----------------------|
|                  |
| **POWER OF ATTORNEY** |

 

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Lionel Reilly or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf (i) to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008, and any such amendment thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“**SEC**”) pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (ii) to file the Annual Report on Form 10-K, any amendment thereto, and all exhibits and documents required in connection therewith with the SEC, and (iii) generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of October, 2008.

 

| /s/ G.W. Buckaloo, Jr., D.V.M. |
|--------------------------------|
| G.W. Buckaloo, Jr., D.V.M.     |

 

| STATE OF MISSOURI | ) |   |
|-------------------|---|--------|
|              | ) | ss.    |
| COUNTY OF JACKSON | ) |   |

 

On this 17th day of October, 2008, before me, a Notary public qualified for said County, personally came G.W. Buckaloo, Jr., D.V.M., known to me to be the identical person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the execution thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.

 

| /s/ Vivian Ellenberger |
|------------------------|
| Notary Public          |
| My commission expires: |

 

| 2-12-12 |
|---------|
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Adagio Acquisition III, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
      P. Dioguardi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ William
              P. DioguardiWilliam P. Dioguardi
              Principal Executive Officer
              Principal Financial Officer
              May 11, 2006
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Borderline Management, LLC, * From the 29th District Court

 of Palo Pinto County,

 Trial Court No. C46164-1.

Vs. No. 11-19-00152-CV * March 5, 2020

Suzann Ruff, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, S.C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

 Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

 sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we 

reverse the order of the trial court insofar as it awarded $14,355 to Suzann Ruff for 

attorney’s fees, and we remand that issue to the trial court for a redetermination of 

the amount of attorney’s fees that Suzann Ruff is entitled to receive. In all other 

respects, the order of the trial court is affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal are taxed against Borderline Management, LLC.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1497 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1497

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow tax-exempt bond 
          financing for fixed-wing emergency medical aircraft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 22, 2009

  Ms. Cantwell (for herself and Mrs. Murray) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow tax-exempt bond 
          financing for fixed-wing emergency medical aircraft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TAX-EXEMPT BOND FINANCING FOR FIXED-WING EMERGENCY MEDICAL 
              AIRCRAFT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (e) of section 147 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to no portion of bonds may be issued for 
skyboxes, airplanes, gambling establishments, etc.) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new sentence: ``The preceding sentence 
shall not apply to any fixed-wing aircraft equipped for, and 
exclusively dedicated to providing, acute care emergency medical 
services (within the meaning of 4261(g)(2)).''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to obligations issued after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7408

ROBERT DOUGLAS TURNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NED M. MIKULA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-95-693)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Douglas Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the

district court. Turner v. Mikula, No. CA-95-693 (E.D. Va. Aug. 2,

1995). To the extent that Appellant claims his counsel conspired

with the prosecution, his claim may not be barred by the statute of

limitations, but it is barred by the Supreme Court's holding in

Heck v. Humphrey, ___ U.S. ___, 62 U.S.L.W. 4594 (U.S. June 24,

1994) (No. 93-6188). In all other respects Appellant's claims

against his attorney are not cognizable because the attorney was

not a state actor. See Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312 (1981);

Deas v. Potts, 547 F.2d 800 (4th Cir. 1976). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

KAREN TURLEY and MICHAEL 

TURLEY,

)

)

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 14-cv-0004 (TSC)(AK)

)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, )

)

Defendant. )

)

ORDER

Upon careful consideration of the record in this case, Magistrate Judge Kay’s Report & 

Recommendation (ECF No. 22), and having received no objections or responses to the 

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation from either of the parties to this case, the Court 

hereby ADOPTS and ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation in full. It is therefore

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED IN 

PART and DENIED IN PART; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiffs are awarded total fees and costs of $10,503.79, as calculated 

at pages 11-12 of Magistrate Judge Kay’s Report & Recommendation; and it is further

ORDERED that the Court retains jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of 

enforcing the directives set forth in this order and resolving any disputes or other matters related 

thereto.

THIS IS A FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER.
Date: November 18, 2015

Tanya S. Chutkan 

TANYA S. CHUTKAN

United States District Judge
****

In The

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

**________________________**

**No. 07-13-0036-CR**

**________________________**

**JOHN MURPHY, APPELLANT**

**V.**

**THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE**

****

**On Appeal from the 361ST District Court**

**Brazos County, Texas**

**Trial Court No. 11-00935-CRF-361, Honorable Harold “Bob” Towslee, Presiding**

****

**February 20, 2013**

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

**Before Quinn, C.J., and Hancock and Pirtle, JJ.**

	Pursuant to a plea bargain, Appellant, John Murphy, was convicted of injury to a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual with an affirmative finding on use of a deadly weapon and sentenced to thirty-five years confinement.[footnoteRef:1]  The *Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal* reflects that Appellant's case is a plea bargain case, that he has no right of appeal and that he waived the right of appeal.  The certification notwithstanding, Appellant’s counsel filed a notice of appeal challenging the conviction.   [1: TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.04(e) (WEST SUPP. 2012).] 

	By letter dated January 16, 2013,[footnoteRef:2] the transferor court notified Appellant’s counsel of the consequences of the certification and invited him to file a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal on or before February 6, 2013, noting that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal.   [2: Originally appealed to the 10th Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts.  TEX. GOVT CODE ANN.  73.001 (WEST 2005).  We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the 10th Court of Appeals and that of this Court on certifications of defendant’s right of appeal.  TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.] 

	Counsel did not file a response.  Consequently, we have no alternative but to dismiss this appeal based on the certification signed by the trial court.  *See* TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

							Patrick A. Pirtle

							      Justice

Do not publish.

2

# image1.jpeg
Amendment Eleven to the 1995 Key Employees' Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT ELEVEN TO THE 

1995 KEY EMPLOYEES’ STOCK OPTION PLAN OF 

DUKE REALTY INVESTMENTS, INC. 

This Amendment Eleven to the 1995 Key Employees’ Stock Option Plan of Duke Realty Investments, Inc.
(“Plan”) is hereby adopted as of the 28th day of
April, 2010 by Duke Realty Corporation (“Corporation”). Each capitalized term not otherwise defined herein has the meaning set forth in the Plan. 

WITNESSETH: 

WHEREAS, the Corporation maintains the Plan for the purposes set forth therein; and 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation approved, subject to approval by the Corporation’s shareholders, an amendment to
the Plan to permit a one-time stock option exchange program for employees other than the Corporation’s named executive officers and directors (the “Amendment”); and 

WHEREAS, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Corporation held on April 28, 2010, the Corporation’s stockholders voted
in favor of the Amendment; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of April 28, 2010, by adding the
following new Section 3.9(d): 
 “OPTION EXCHANGE: Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary,
upon approval of this amendment by the Company’s shareholders in accordance with the terms of this Plan, the Board of Directors or the Committee may provide for, and the Company may implement, a one-time-only option exchange offer, pursuant to
which certain outstanding Options could, at the election of the person holding such Option, be tendered to the Company for cancellation in exchange for the issuance of a lesser number of restricted stock units, provided that (a) the terms and
conditions of such one-time-only option exchange offer are materially consistent with the description of the exchange offer contained in the Company’s Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on March 17, 2010 for the Company’s 2010 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders at which the exchange offer was approved, and (b) the exchange offer is commenced within 12 months after the date of such shareholder approval.” 

All other provisions of the Plan shall remain the same and in full force and effect. 

[remainder of page intentionally blank] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Duke Realty Corporation, by a duly authorized
officer thereunder, has executed this Amendment Eleven to the 1995 Key Employees’ Stock Option Plan of Duke Realty Investments, Inc. effective as of the
28th day of April, 2010. 

 

			
	DUKE REALTY CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Dennis D. Oklak

		 	Dennis D. Oklak
		 	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer