Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2012 / Notices 11489 

18As discussed in the First Partial Preliminary 

Results, the Department selected four mandatory 

respondents. In the First Partial Preliminary 

Results, the Department found Longtai and 

Hongqiao to be part of the PRC-wide entity. 

Final Results of Review 

As a result of our review, we 

determine that the following margin 

exists for the PRC-wide entity during 

the period November 1, 2009, through 

October 31, 2010.18

Manufacturer/exporter 

Weighted-average margin (dollars per kilogram) 

PRC-wide entity (see Appendix I) ........................ 4.71 

Assessment and Cash Deposit Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the 

Department will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with these 

partial final results of review. The 

Department will direct CBP to assess a 

$4.71 per-unit (i.e., per kilogram) 

assessment rate amount on each entry of 

the subject merchandise, entered, or 

withdrawn for entry, during the POR, by 

companies subject to these partial final 

results. The Department intends to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions for 

such companies directly to CBP 15 days 

after the publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register. 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of these final results of 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For all PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the PRC-wide entity rate of $4.71 per 

kilogram; and (2) for all non-PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the PRC exporter that 

supplied that non-PRC exporter. These 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with regulations and 

terms of an APO is a violation which is 

subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice of these final results in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 17, 2012. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I 

1. Linshu Dading Private Agricultural 

Products Co., Ltd. 

2. Linyi City Kangfa Foodstuff Drinkable Co., 

Ltd. 

3. Shandong Chenhe Int’l Trading Co., Ltd. 

4. Shenzhen Greening Trading Co., Ltd. 

5. Sunny Import & Export Limited 

6. Shandong Longtai Fruits and Vegetables 

Co., Ltd. 

7. Weifang Hongqiao International Logistic 

Co., Ltd. 

Appendix II 

1. Jining Yifa Garlic Produce Co., Ltd. 

2. Jining Yongjia Trade Co., Ltd. 

3. Jinxiang Chengda Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

4. Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd. 

5. Jinxiang Yuanxin Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

6. Qingdao Sea-Line International Trading 

Co., Ltd. 

7. Qingdao Tiantaixing Foods Co., Ltd. 

8. Shandong Wonderland Organic Food Co., 

Ltd. 

9. Shanghai LJ International Trading Co., Ltd. 

10. Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd. 

11. Weifang Chenglong Import & Export Co., 

Ltd. 

12. XuZhou Simple Garlic Industry Co., Ltd. 

13. Zhengzhou Huachao Industrial Co., Ltd. 

14. Zhengzhou Yuanli Trading Co., Ltd. 

Appendix III 

Comment 1: Selection and Corroboration of 

the PRC-wide entity rate as to the PRCentity 

Comment 2: Respondent Selection Process in 

Reviews 

[FR Doc. 2012–4486 Filed 2–24–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–863] 

Honey From the People’s Republic of 

China: Extension of Time Limit for 

Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 27, 

2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Catherine Bertrand, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3207. 

Background 

On January 3, 2012, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published 

the notice preliminarily rescinding the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

on honey from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’), covering the period 

December 12, 2009, through November 

30, 2010. See Honey From the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary 

Rescission of the Administrative Review, 

77 FR 79 (January 3, 2012). The final 

results are currently due on May 2, 

2012. 

Extension of Time Limits for Final 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), requires 

the Department to issue the final results 

in an administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order 120 days after 

the date on which the preliminary 

results are published. The Department 

may, however, extend the deadline for 

completion of the final results of an 

administrative review to 180 days if it 

determines it is not practicable to 

complete the review within the 

foregoing time period. See section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2). 

The Department requires additional 

time to complete this review because 

the Department must fully analyze and 

consider significant issues regarding 

whether the respondent’s sales were 

bona fide. Further, the Department 

extended the due date for submission of 

the rebuttal comments to the case briefs 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
11490 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2012 / Notices 

at the request of an interested party. 

Thus, it is not practicable to complete 

this review within the time specified 

under the Act. Therefore, we are 

extending the time for the completion of 

the final results of this review by 40 

days to June 11, 2012. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 21, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–4490 Filed 2–24–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation 

in Part 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) has received 

requests to conduct administrative 

reviews of various antidumping and 

countervailing duty orders and findings 

with January anniversary dates. In 

accordance with the Department’s 

regulations, we are initiating those 

administrative reviews. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 27, 

2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Unit, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–4735. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department has received timely 

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), for administrative reviews of 

various antidumping and countervailing 

duty orders and findings with January 

anniversary dates. With respect to the 

antidumping duty order on Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture from the People’s 

Republic of China, the initiation of the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

for that case is being published in a 

separate initiation notice. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

various types of information, 

certifications, or comments or actions by 

the Department discussed below refer to 

the number of calendar days from the 

applicable starting time. 

Notice of No Sales 

If a producer or exporter named in 

this notice of initiation had no exports, 

sales, or entries during the period of 

review (‘‘POR’’), it must notify the 

Department within 60 days of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. All submissions must be filed 

electronically at http:// 

iaaccess.trade.gov in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.303. See Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order 

Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). 

Such submissions are subject to 

verification in accordance with section 

782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘Act’’). Further, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(3)(ii), a copy of each request 

must be served on the petitioner and 

each exporter or producer specified in 

the request. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event the Department limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews, 

the Department intends to select 

respondents based on U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. 

imports during the POR. We intend to 

release the CBP data under 

Administrative Protective Order 

(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO 

within seven days of publication of this 

initiation notice and to make our 

decision regarding respondent selection 

within 21 days of publication of this 

Federal Register notice. The 

Department invites comments regarding 

the CBP data and respondent selection 

within five days of placement of the 

CBP data on the record of the applicable 

review. 

In the event the Department decides 

it is necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: 

In general, the Department has found 

that determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, the Department 

will not conduct collapsing analyses at 

the respondent selection phase of this 

review and will not collapse companies 

at the respondent selection phase unless 

there has been a determination to 

collapse certain companies in a 

previous segment of this antidumping 

proceeding (i.e., investigation, 

administrative review, new shipper 

review or changed circumstances 

review). For any company subject to this 

review, if the Department determined, 

or continued to treat, that company as 

collapsed with others, the Department 

will assume that such companies 

continue to operate in the same manner 

and will collapse them for respondent 

selection purposes. Otherwise, the 

Department will not-collapse companies 

for purposes of respondent selection. 

Parties are requested to (a) identify 

which companies subject to review 

previously were collapsed, and (b) 

provide a citation to the proceeding in 

which they were collapsed. Further, if 

companies are requested to complete 

the Quantity and Value Questionnaire 

for purposes of respondent selection, in 

general each company must report 

volume and value data separately for 

itself. Parties should not include data 

for any other party, even if they believe 

they should be treated as a single entity 

with that other party. If a company was 

collapsed with another company or 

companies in the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

where the Department considered 

collapsing that entity, complete quantity 

and value data for that collapsed entity 

must be submitted. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that has requested a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that the Department 

may extend this time if it is reasonable 

to do so. In order to provide parties 

additional certainty with respect to 

when the Department will exercise its 

discretion to extend this 90-day 

deadline, interested parties are advised 

that, with regard to reviews requested 

on the basis of anniversary months on 

or after August 2011, the Department 

does not intend to extend the 90-day 

deadline unless the requestor 

demonstrates that an extraordinary 

circumstance has prevented it from 

submitting a timely withdrawal request. 

Determinations by the Department to 

extend the 90-day deadline will be 

made on a case-by-case basis. 

Separate Rates 

In proceedings involving non-market 

economy (‘‘NME’’) countries, the 

Department begins with a rebuttable 

presumption that all companies within 

the country are subject to government 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES