alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.89 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, Reverse Auctions

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Patrick Doran                                                                          |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Chief                Financial Officer                                                                    |
| **(principal                financial and accounting officer)****November                19, 2008**  |

----
|   | (i) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March      31, 2009 (the “Form      10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C.      78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Dated:      May 8, 2009 |
|--------|-------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             /S/      D. FRANK      HARRISON |
|                             D.      Frank Harrison          |
|                             Chief      Executive Officer    |
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) BVB Construction, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W912PL-12-C-0030 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT:
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60910

Mr. Benjamin Valenzuela, Sr.

President Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney John F. Bazan, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE THRASHER The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enterjudgment in favor ofappellant. It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 

### §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the parties' request, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature ofa consentjudgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of$41,000. This amount is inclusive ofinterest. No further interest shall be paid. Dated: 15 June 2017

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals dministrative Judge Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I concur

DAYID D'ALESSANDRIS Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60910, Appeal ofBVB Construction, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.02 MB)

Tags:Vehicle Maintenance , 354th LRS, heavy shop, snow fleet, USAF, Eielson AFB, 354th Fighter Wing

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7391
JAMES DAVID FAIRCLOTH, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RANDALL LEE, Superintendent; WADE L. MOSELEY; ALBERT MOSELEY, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:05-ct-00021-FL) Submitted: February 21, 2007 Decided: June 11, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James David Faircloth, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: James David Faircloth, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Faircloth v. Lee , No. 5:05-ct-00021-FL (E.D.N.C. July 25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1292 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1292

    To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide for take-back 
 disposal of controlled substances in certain instances, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2009

     Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Grassley, and Mrs. Feinstein) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide for take-back 
 disposal of controlled substances in certain instances, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Secure and Responsible Drug Disposal 
Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. DELIVERY OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES BY ULTIMATE USERS FOR 
              DISPOSAL.

    (a) Regulatory Authority.--Section 302 of the Controlled Substances 
Act (21 U.S.C. 822) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g)(1) An ultimate user who has lawfully obtained a controlled 
substance in accordance with this title may, without being registered, 
deliver the controlled substance to another person for the purpose of 
disposal of the controlled substance if--
            ``(A) the person receiving the controlled substance is 
        authorized under this title to engage in such activity; and
            ``(B) the disposal takes place in accordance with 
        regulations issued by the Attorney General to prevent diversion 
        of controlled substances.
    ``(2) The Attorney General may, by regulation, authorize long-term 
care facilities, as defined by the Attorney General by regulation, to 
dispose of controlled substances on behalf of ultimate users in a 
manner that the Attorney General determines will provide effective 
controls against diversion and be consistent with the public health and 
safety.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 308(b) of the Controlled 
Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 828(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (2) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) the delivery of such a substance for the purpose of 
        disposal by an ultimate user or long-term care facility acting 
        in accordance with section 302(g) of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 30689 Summary Calendar

FELIX A. PRICE , Petitioner

- Appellant

v. DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY , Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:17

- CV

- 4052

Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Felix A

. Price, Louisiana prisoner # 91688, appeals from the denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. The magistrate judge denied Price’s Rule 60(b) motion . A fter Price filed a notice of appeal, the district court affirmed the magistrate ju dge’s denial. The magistrate judge lacked authorization to rule on Price’s Rule 60(b)
motion under these circumstances because Price did not consent under 28

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 29, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-30689 Document: 00514620983 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2018No. 17

- 30689

2 U.S.C. § 636(c) and there was no other basis for the magistrate judge’s authority over that mot ion

. See McLeod, Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Quarles , 925 F.2d 853, 856 (5th Cir. 1991); Parks By and Through Parks v. Collins , 761 F.2d 1101, 1104 (5th Cir. 1985). Because the magistrate judge’s order was not a final appealable decision, we lack jurisdiction to review it. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Trufant v. Autocon, Inc. 729 F.2d 308, 309 (5th Cir. 1984). Moreover, Price’s premature notice of appeal was insufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court from the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s denial. See FirsTier Mortg. Co. v. Investors Mortg. Ins. Co. , 498 U.S. 269, 276

- 77 (1991); see also United States v. Cooper , 135 F.3d 960, 963 (5th Cir. 1998). APPEAL DISMISSED. Case: 17-30689 Document: 00514620983 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2018
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 40th District Court of Ellis County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on June 5,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Preston Dennard Massey v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-14-00133-CR Trial Court Number: 37429CR

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated June 5, 2015, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court is reformed as set forth in the opinion

and affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have already been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on December 10, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fitzgeralds Gaming
Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Philip D. Griffith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                 
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of
the dates indicated and result of operations of the Company for the
periods indicated.



| | /s/ Philip D. Griffith
Philip D. Griffith
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 25, 2003
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1456 

To fully compensate local educational agencies and local governments for 

tax revenues lost when the Federal Government takes land into trust 

for the benefit of a federally recognized Indian tribe or an individual 

Indian. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2009 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To fully compensate local educational agencies and local governments for tax revenues lost when the Federal Government takes land into trust for the benefit of a federally 

recognized Indian tribe or an individual Indian. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Land-In-Trust Schools 

5 and Local Governments Equitable Compensation Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1456 IS

1 SEC. 2. MANDATORY PAYMENTS FOR CERTAIN LANDS HELD 

2 IN TRUST. 

3 For each fiscal year that begins after the date of the 

4 enactment of this Act— 

5 (1) the Secretary of the Interior shall pay each 

6 local educational agency and unit of local govern7 ment such amounts as are necessary to ensure that 

8 such local educational agency and unit of general 

9 local government receives full payment for the 

10 amount of property tax revenues lost as a result of 

11 lands within their jurisdiction being held in trust by 

12 the United States for the benefit of a federally rec13 ognized Indian tribe or an individual Indian, to be 

14 calculated so that the taxes (otherwise payable but 

15 for the status of the lands being held in trust) shall 

16 be assessed and paid annually at the same rate as 

17 the taxes would be assessed and paid if not in trust; 

18 and 

19 (2) the Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer 

20 directly to the Secretary of Interior from the general 

21 fund of the Treasury, without further appropriation, 

22 such amounts as are necessary, after taking into ac23 count amount appropriated for this purpose, to carry 

24 out paragraph (1). 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 1456 IS

1 SEC. 3. PARTIAL PAYMENTS FOR CERTAIN LANDS HELD IN 

2 TRUST. 

3 Notwithstanding section 2, a local education agency 

4 or a unit of local government may enter into a written 

5 agreement with the Secretary of the Interior, the appro6 priate State, and, if appropriate, any federally recognized 

7 Indian tribe or individual Indian, under which all parties 

8 agree that the amounts described in section 2 shall be— 

9 (1) waived in whole or in part; 

10 (2) limited for an agreed upon number of years; 

11 or 

12 (3) otherwise adjusted, including the timing of 

13 any payment or payments. 

14 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

15 This Act shall apply to all lands taken into trust by 

16 the United States for the benefit of a federally recognized 

17 Indian tribe or an individual Indian on or after October 

18 1, 2008. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                          COMPUTRON SOFTWARE, INC.
                            LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

                          (AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997)


Computron Software Europe Limited (incorporated in England and Wales)
Computron Software International Limited -- In Liquidation (Hong Kong)
Computron Software Pty Limited (incorporated in Australia)
Computron Software Asia Pte Ltd (incorporated in Singapore)
Computron Software (Canada) Inc. (incorporated in Canada)
Computron Poland Sp.z.o.o. (incorporated in Poland)
Computron Software Germany GmbH. (incorporated in Germany)
Computron Software S.A. (incorporated in France)
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 144 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to remove cell phones from 

listed property under section 280F. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. ENSIGN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to remove 

cell phones from listed property under section 280F. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Modernize Our Book5 keeping In the Law for Employee’s Cell Phone Act of 

6 2009’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 144 IS

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF CELLULAR TELEPHONES (OR SIMILAR 

2 TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT) FROM 

3 LISTED PROPERTY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

5 280F(d)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code (defining listed 

6 property) is amended by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of 

7 clause (iv), by striking clause (v), and by redesignating 

8 clause (vi) as clause (v). 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 December 31, 2008. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS