alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of E Energy Adams, LLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer, as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)), and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over
financial reporting.
 Date:      August 13, 2008
    /s/ Jonathan CosbyJonathan Cosby, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of the agreements are available through the Commission's Web site (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     012067-005.                

*Title:*                     U.S. Supplemental Agreement to HLC Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     BBC Chartering & Logistics GmbH & Co. KG; Beluga Chartering GmbH; Chipolbrok; Clipper Project Ltd.; Hyndai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.; Industrial Maritime Carriers, L.L.C.; Nordana Line A/S; and Rickmers-Linie GmbH & Cie. KG.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wade S. Hooker, Esq.; 211 Central Park W, New York, NY 10024.                

*Synopsis:*                     The adds Peter Dohle Schiffahrts KG as party to the HLC Agreement.                

*Agreement No.:*                     012157.                

*Title:*                     CSCL/CMA CGM Slot Exchange Agreement Asia—U.S. East Coast.                

*Parties:*                     China Shipping Container Lines Co., Ltd., China Shipping Container Lines (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., and CMA CGM S.A.                

*Filing Party:*                     Tara L. Leiter, Esquire; Blank Rome LLP; 600 New Hampshire Avenue NW.; Washington, DC 20037.                

*Synopsis:*                     The agreement authorizes China Shipping and CMA to charter slots to each other on their vessels in the trade between the U.S. East and Gulf Coasts and Asia.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: February 24, 2012.

Karen V. Gregory, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-4858 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CurrencySharesSMEuro Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Carl G. Verboncoeur, Chief Executive Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|Date: March 19, 2007                        
|                                            
|/s/ Carl G. Verboncoeur Carl G.
Verboncoeur*
|Chief Executive Officer                     
|(principal executive officer)               

---

|* | The Registrant is a trust and Carl G. Verboncoeur is signing in his capacity as the principal executive officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order entered February 1 2 , 2014

In The **Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**  No. 05 - 13 - 01311 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF N .A.A. AND K.D.A., CH ILDREN On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 3 80 - 52696 - 06 ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 15, 2014 motion for extension of time to file brief concurrently tendered. The motion was held pending a response from appellant regarding the timeliness of his appeal. On January 31, 2014, we r eceived appellant’s respon se. In his response, appellant assert s the notice of appeal , which was filed one day late but within the fifteen

- day grace period allowed under rule 26.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, was timely filed under the “mail box rule.” See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.2(b), 26.3. Attached to appellant’s letter is a certified mail receipt and a United States Postal Service tracking sheet r e flecting appellant filed his notice of appeal within the time allowed under rule 26.1(a)

. See id. 26.1(a). Although given an opportunity to reply, appellee has not replied. We consider the notice of appeal timely for jurisdictional purposes, g iven appellant’ s proof. W e GRANT appellant’s January 15 th extension motion and ORDER the brief concurrently tendered filed as of the date of this order. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(333-133782, 333-128385, 333-88760, 333-62118, 333-13707, 333-16313, 333-42809, 333-47175,333-47177, 333-61315, 333-79249, 333-87987, 333-45078, 333-102688, 333-108505 and 333-143675) andForm S-3 (333-147766) of Borland Software Corporation of our report dated March 7, 2008 relating tothe financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPSan Jose, California
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

REVISED DECEMBER 1, 2005

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 03-50057

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

HORACE EDWARD HOLLIS, JR

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, Waco

W-02-CR-62-ALL

---------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the

sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand case for resentencing consistent with Mitchell v. United

States, 482 F.2d 289 (5th Cir. 1973) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 30, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
extend the time to file supplemental material requested by court

fourteen (14) days from disposition of motion to vacate is DENIED

AS MOOT.
ex-1004.htm



	 EXHIBIT 10.4
	 
	 





 


Amendment to


The Dow Chemical Company


Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan







 


By authority of the resolution of the board of directors of The Dow Chemical Company adopted on April 14, 2010, and Article VI of The Dow Chemical Company Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (“Plan”), as restated and effective April 14, 2010, Section 6.06 is amended and restated as follows:


 



	
6.06

	
Amendment







 


The Board or its delegate may amend or modify the Plan at any time, and the President, Chief Financial Officer, VPHR, Vice President of Compensation and Benefits, and Global Director of Benefits, each acting individually, may amend or modify the Plan at any time.


 


Notwithstanding the foregoing:  (i) an amendment that affects only Section 16 Employees, as defined by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and determined by the Administrator, shall not be valid unless it is adopted or approved by the Board; (ii) any amendment shall have prospective application only and shall not reduce or impair a Participant's right to benefits accrued and vested under the Plan as of the date such amendment is made; and (iii) no amendment of the Plan shall apply to amounts that were earned and vested (within the meaning of Code section 409A and regulations thereunder) under the Plan prior to 2005, unless the amendment specifically provides that it applies to such amounts.  The purpose of this restriction is to prevent a Plan amendment from resulting in an inadvertent "material modification" to amounts that are "grandfathered" and exempt from the requirements of Code section 409A.


 


Each Participant shall receive written notice of the amendment or termination of the Plan describing the action taken in detail.


 


The authority of the President, Chief Financial Officer, VPHR, Vice President of Compensation and Benefits, and Global Director of Benefits to amend or modify the Plan under this Section 6.06 may not be delegated.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amended and restated Plan document to be executed in its name on this 14th day of April, 2010.


 


 


 



	 	 THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY





 


 



	 	 By:	  /s/ GREGORY M. FREIWALD
	 	 	 
	 	 Its:	 Executive Vice President of Human Resources,
	 	 	 Aviation & Corporate Affairs





 






  





62
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50468 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. SCOUBART QUGO REFUGO, also known as Jose Juan Hernandez-Torres Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-861-ALL
Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Scoubart Qugo Refugo appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation. Because Refugo previously had been convicted of illegal reentry, his offense level was adjusted upward by four levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(D). Refugo requested a downward variance from the guidelines sentence range. The request was denied, and Refugo was sentenced at the top of the guidelines range to 21 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D January 6, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-50468

2 Refugo contends that his sentence of imprisonment was greater than necessary to accomplish the goals ofsentencing listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2). Refugo concedes that this court ordinarily applies a presumption of reasonableness to within-guideli nes sentences. See United States v. CamposMaldonado, 531 F.3d 337, 338 (5th Cir.), ce rt. denied, 129 S. Ct. 328 (2008); United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 565-66 (5th Cir.), c ert. denied, 2008 WL 2754087 (Dec. 1, 2008) (No. 08-5226). Citing K imbrough v. Uni ted States, 128 S. Ct. 558, 574-75 (2007), Refugo contends that the presumption should not apply i n this case because § 2L1.2 is not empirically supported. In support of his contention that application ofthis guideline results in sentences that are arbitrarily harsh, he notes that his conviction for illegal reentry was considered both in determining his criminal history score and in applying the four-level adjustment under § 2L1.2. Refugo also contends that the guidelines range did not account for the following factors: that the instant illegal reentry offense did not involveviolence, drugsor firearms; the seriousness ofthe offense was mitigated by his history of mental health problems; and his prior offenses were relatively minor. Refugo’s reliance on Kimbrough is misplaced as the Court did not address the applicability of the presumption of reasonableness. The district court considered Refugo’s request for leniency in light of his personal circumstances, but it ultimately determined that a sentence within the guidelines range was appropriate. Refugo’s within-guidelines sentence is presumptively reasonable, and Refugo has not shown that his sentence is unreasonable. See CamposMaldonado, 531 F.3d at 338; Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d at 565-66. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1288 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1288

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize appropriations for grants to the States participating in 
  the Emergency Management Assistance Compact, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Management Assistance 
Compact Grant Reauthorization Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE COMPACT GRANTS.

    Section 661(d) of the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act 
of 2006 (6 U.S.C. 761(d)) is amended by striking ``fiscal year 2008'' 
and inserting ``each of fiscal years 2010 through 2012''.

            Passed the Senate July 14, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1288

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize appropriations for grants to the States participating in 
  the Emergency Management Assistance Compact, and for other purposes.
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.92 MB)

Tags:Loglines, I am DLA, January 2019

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 21.1
LIST OF SUBSIDIARY CORPORATIONS OF LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC.       Jurisdiction of % of VotingName Incorporation Securities OwnedSubsidiary of Landstar System, Inc.:    Landstar System Holdings, Inc. Delaware 100Subsidiaries of Landstar System Holdings, Inc.:    Landstar Express America, Inc. North Carolina 100Landstar Inway, Inc. Delaware 100Also d/b/a Inway Nationwide Transportation Services    Also d/b/a Independent Freightways, Inc.    Landstar Logistics, Inc. Delaware 100Landstar Ligon, Inc. Delaware 100Also d/b/a Ligon Contract Services in Kentucky    Landstar Ranger, Inc. Delaware 100Also d/b/a Ranger/Landstar, Inc. in South Carolina    Risk Management Claim Services, Inc. Kentucky 100Also d/b/a RMCS, Inc. in Alabama and California    Landstar Carrier Services, Inc. Delaware 100Landstar Contractor Financing, Inc. Delaware 100Signature Insurance Company Cayman Islands, BWI 100Signature Technology Services, Inc. Delaware 100Subsidiary of Landstar Ranger, Inc.    Landstar Gemini, Inc. Delaware 100Also d/b/a Gemini Transportation Services of Greensburg,    PA in Ontario and New Jersey    Also d/b/a GTSI Transportation Services in Ontario    Also d/b/a Landstar Less Than Truck Load    Also d/b/a Landstar LTL
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00348

- CR

NO. 02

- 13

- 00349

- CR

CHRISTOPHER WOOTTON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT CO URT NO. 4 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered Appellan t’s “Motion to Withdraw Notice of Appeal,”

which request s that the se appeals be dismissed. This motion substantially

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. 3

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

3 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).2 No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this

motion, we grant Appellant’s motion and dismiss these appeals. 4

P ER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 3, 2013

4 See Tex. R. App. P. 42 .2( a ), 43.2(f).
' \.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1398 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1398

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to increase the 
 payment rate for certain payments under the milk income loss contract 
                    program as an emergency measure.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 6, 2009

Mrs. Gillibrand introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to increase the 
 payment rate for certain payments under the milk income loss contract 
                    program as an emergency measure.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Dairy Preservation Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. MILK INCOME LOSS CONTRACT PROGRAM.

    Section 1506(c)(3) of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 
2008 (7 U.S.C. 8773(c)(3)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (E); 
        and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(B) for the period beginning on October 1, 2008, 
                and ending on February 28, 2009, 45 percent;
                    ``(C) for the period beginning on March 1, 2009, 
                and ending on November 30, 2009, 90 percent; and
                    ``(D) for the period beginning on December 1, 2009, 
                and ending on August 31, 2012, 45 percent; and''.
                                 <all>
```