alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00499-CV

In the INTEREST OF J.A.M., J.R.M., J.P.M., and J.A.M., Children

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21-03-39707-MCVAJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal III, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Irene Rios, Justice

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 28, 2022

AFFIRMED

Mother A.G.

1 appeals the trial court’s order, wherein Mother’s sister, Y.F., was appointed 

sole managing conservator of Mother’s children, J.A.M., J.R.M., J.P.M., and J.A.M., and Mother 

was appointed possessory conservator of her children with court-ordered possession. Mother’s 

parental rights were not terminated. 

Mother’s court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief representing that 

she conducted a professional evaluation of the record and determined there are no arguable grounds 

to be raised on appeal. The brief satisfies the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967); see In re P.M., 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 n.10 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam) (recognizing Anders

1 To protect the identity of the minor children, we refer to the parties by fictitious names, initials, or aliases. See TEX.

FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(d); TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(b)(2).
04-22-00499-CV

- 2 -

procedure applies in parental termination appeals). Counsel also certified that she sent a copy of 

the brief and the motion to withdraw to Mother, informed her of the right to review the record and 

file her own brief, and provided Mother with a form motion to request access to the record. See

Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re A.L.H., No. 04-18-00153-

CV, 2018 WL 3861695, at *2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Aug. 15, 2018, no pet.). Mother submitted 

a pro se brief.

After reviewing the record, counsel’s brief, and Mother’s pro se brief, we agree that there 

are no meritorious issues to be raised and the appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm the trial 

court’s order. We deny counsel’s motion to withdraw because she does not assert any ground for 

withdrawal other than her conclusion that the appeal is frivolous. In re P.M., 520 S.W.3d at 27–28

(holding counsel’s obligations in parental termination cases extend through the exhaustion or 

waiver of all appeals, including the filing of a petition for review in the Texas Supreme Court). 

Irene Rios, Justice
Exhibit 13



THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD.



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY

RULE
13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Katsunori Nagayasu, President (principal executive officer) of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    KATSUNORI NAGAYASUName:

Katsunori NagayasuTitle:

President(Principal executive officer)




Dated: September 2, 2009



---

THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD.



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY

RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

AND
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of The Bank of
Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Takashi Oyamada, Managing
Director (principal financial officer) of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    TAKASHI OYAMADAName:

Takashi OyamadaTitle:

Managing Director(Principal financial officer)




Dated: September 2, 2009
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Black Nickel Acquisition Corp. III (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael D. Pruitt, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




February 25, 2011
/s/ Michael D. PruittMichael D. Pruitt

Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

DEANNA FULTON, KUNOOR CHOPRA,

Appellants

v.

LAGUNITAS BREWING COMPANY,

Appellee

______________________

2022-1471

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No. 

91254430.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of appellants’ unopposed motion to 

voluntarily dismiss this appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 42(b) and the parties’ agreement as to 

the allocation of costs,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted to the extent that the appeal 

is withdrawn. 

Case: 22-1471 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 07/11/2022
2 FULTON v. LAGUNITAS BREWING COMPANY

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

 July 11, 2022 

 Date

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 11, 2022

Case: 22-1471 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 07/11/2022
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-12-0572

SAT Date: 10/5/2012

Print Date: 7/1/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: No suitable analogs found.

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 12

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: MUTA; ONCO; DEVEL (UNCERT); AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-12-0572

FATE: 

MP = 197 C (E)

log Kow = -0.61 (E) 

S = 9.2 g/L at 25 C (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 1.00 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)

log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E) 
POTW removal (%) = 0-90 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = low

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: Not absorbed through the skin as the neat material poor 

absorption through the skin if in solution; absorbed from the lung and GI tract (pchem). Concern 

for mutagenicity based on submitted test data and oncogenicity based on aromatic amines and 

uncertain concern for developmental toxicity based on mutagenicity and oncogenicity concerns.

 Test Data: (+) in Salmonella strain TA98 with activation, (-) in other 

strains of Salmonella with activation and all stains without activation; (-) E. coli with and 

without activation

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 >100

daphnid 48-h LC50 1.3

green algal 96-h EC50 7.7

fish _ chronic value 7.8

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.11

algal _ chronic 

value

11

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for SAR chemical class 

= ; MW 177; log Kow = -0.465 (EPI), -0.61 (M); pH7; 

unknown mp (P); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured 

concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

11

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 
 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6881

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

KAREEM TAYLOR, a/k/a Che, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (5:06-cr-00057-F-2) 

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 27, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Kareem Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson Kocher, 

Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Kareem Taylor appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction 

in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Taylor, No. 5:06-cr-00057-F-2 

(E.D.N.C. May 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
# EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of CurrencySharesSMEuro Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Financial Officer of Rydex
Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: September 8, 2008

/s/ Nick Bonos  Nick Bonos*Chief
Financial Officer(principal financial officer)

*The Registrant is a trust
and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex
Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
Exhibit 21.1LIST OF SUBSIDIARY CORPORATIONS OF LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC.                Jurisdiction of % of VotingName Incorporation Securities OwnedSubsidiary of Landstar System, Inc.:        Landstar System Holdings, Inc. Delaware  100 Subsidiaries of Landstar System Holdings, Inc.:        Landstar Inway, Inc. Delaware  100 Also d/b/a Inway Nationwide Transportation Services        Also d/b/a Independent Freightways, Inc.        Landstar Global Logistics, Inc. Delaware  100 Landstar Ligon, Inc. Delaware  100 Also d/b/a Ligon Contract Services in Kentucky        Landstar Ranger, Inc. Delaware  100 Also d/b/a Ranger/Landstar, Inc. in South Carolina        Risk Management Claim Services, Inc. Kentucky  100 Also d/b/a RMCS, Inc. in Alabama and California        Landstar Carrier Services, Inc. Delaware  100 Landstar Contractor Financing, Inc. Delaware  100 Signature Insurance Company Cayman Islands,  BWI  100 Landstar Canada Holdings, Inc. Delaware  100 Signature Technology Services, Inc. Delaware  100 Subsidiary of Landstar Canada Holdings, Inc      Landstar Canada, Inc. Ontario, Canada  100 Subsidiary of Landstar Global Logistics, Inc.      Landstar Express America, Inc. North Carolina  100 Subsidiary of Landstar Ranger, Inc.        Landstar Gemini, Inc. Delaware  100 Also d/b/a Gemini Transportation Services of Greensburg,        PA in Ontario and New Jersey        Also d/b/a GTSI Transportation Services in Ontario        Also d/b/a Landstar Less Than Truck Load        Also d/b/a Landstar LTL        
65
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00514-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF Consuella Perkins ULBRICH, Deceased

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PC-0686

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, appellant’s motion for rehearing is 

GRANTED; the probate court’s Order Awarding Exempt Property is REVERSED; and this cause 

is REMANDED for the probate court to rule on Appellant Douglas J. Ulbrich’s section 271 

application.

Further, the probate court’s Order Finding Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel Apply is 

REVERSED AND VACATED. Costs of appeal are taxed against Appellees Robert T. Hope, 

Darlene Wilson, and Deborah Byrd. 

SIGNED January 15, 2014.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
Exhibit 10.2


 


UTSTARCOM, INC.


 


May 3, 2010


 


Re:          Kenneth Luk Resignation


 


Dear Mr. Luk:


 


This letter confirms our
agreement that you are hereby voluntarily resigning effective as of the date
immediately following the filing by UTStarcom, Inc. (the “Company”), with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission of its quarterly report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, (the “Effective
Date”) from all of your service positions with the Company
including, but not limited to: Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
and employee.


 


You acknowledge and
understand that your voluntary resignation is neither a termination without
Cause (as defined in the Company’s Amended and Restated Executive Involuntary
Termination Severance Pay Plan (the “Plan”) and
as referenced in your offer letter with the Company dated November 15,
2009 (the “Offer Letter”)) nor a
termination for Good Reason (as defined in the Plan and referenced in the Offer
Letter).


 


However, in consideration
of your execution, on or following the Effective Date and on or prior to June 30,
2010, of the attached separation agreement and release (the “Separation Agreement”), without
revocation, and subject to your continued employment, full business efforts and
fulfillment of your duties to the
Company through the Effective Date, including assisting with, and signing all required
certifications related to, the Company’s filing of the Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, the Company agrees to provide you the
following severance: (i) a lump-sum cash severance payment of $91,500 plus the
prorated amount of your base salary from the Effective Date through June 17,
2010, less applicable tax withholding; (ii) your retention of the sign-on bonus that
you otherwise would have been required to reimburse in full to the Company
pursuant to the terms of the Offer Letter; and (iii) accelerated vesting
of 50,000 shares of your initial restricted stock award covering shares of the
Company’s common stock, each as further described in the Separation
Agreement.  You acknowledge that you are
not entitled to any other benefits from the Company as a result of your
resignation other than the foregoing consideration and your accrued but unused
annual leave (if any) as required by applicable law and any accrued but unpaid
base salary as of the Effective Date.


 


 


	
  AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  UTStarcom, Inc.

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ PETER BLACKMORE

  	
   

  	
  /s/ KENNETH LUK

  
	
  Peter Blackmore

  	
   

  	
  Kenneth Luk

  
	
  Chief Executive Officer
  and President
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Cutter & Buck Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon July 14, 2005 (“the Report”), I, John T. Wyatt, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ JOHN  T. WYATT                  |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | John T. Wyatt                            |
|   | *President and Chief Executive  Officer* |
|   | *(Principal Executive Officer)*          |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1513 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1513

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
 Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2009

Ms. Landrieu (for herself and Ms. Snowe) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
 Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS 
              UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND THE SMALL BUSINESS 
              INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958.

    (a) In General.--Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to extend 
temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business Administration'', 
approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109-316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most 
recently amended by section 1 of Public Law 111-10 (123 Stat. 990), is 
amended by striking ``July 31, 2009'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``September 30, 2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on July 30, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                              INPRISE CORPORATION
 
                       ACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     Name                                         Jurisdiction of Incorporation
     ----                                         -----------------------------
     <S>                                          <C>
     INPRISE (AUSTRALIA) PTY, LTD.                       Australia
     INPRISE CANADA SOFTWARE, INC.                       Canada
     INPRISE (UK) LIMITED                                United Kingdom
     INPRISE (FRANCE), SARL                              France
     INPRISE GMBH                                        Germany
     INPRISE (HONG KONG) LTD.                            Hong Kong
     INPRISE COMPANY, LTD.                               Japan
     INPRISE, B.V.                                       Netherlands
     INPRISE TECHNOLOGIES (SINGAPORE) PTE., LTD.         Singapore
     INPRISE TECHNOLOGY, INC.                            Delaware
     INTERBASE SOFTWARE CORPORATION                      Delaware
     INTERACTIVE OBJECTS SOFTWARE GMBH                   Germany
     APOGEE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.                    United States
     INPRISE DO BRAZIL INFORMATICA LTDA                  Brasil
</TABLE>
FAA Docket No. 16-11-06

Motion by the County of Santa Clara to Relieve Palo Alto Airport and Reid-Hill Airport 

from Grant Funding Suspension imposed by the December 19, 2011 

Directors Decision Regarding San Martin Airport (E16)

EXHIBITS ARE IN OFFICIAL PAPER DOCKET

(Charts are oversized)
Exhibit
32.1


Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2010 (the “Report”) of United States Oil Fund, LP (the “Registrant”), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Nicholas D. Gerber, the President and Chief Executive Officer of United States
Commodity Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.







Date:  May
      10, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Nicholas D. GerberName:
                Title:
              Nicholas
      D. Gerber
                President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
                General
      Partner of United States Oil Fund,
LP