alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed, September 13, 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00381

- CV

____________ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY , Appellant

V.

CALVIN MCCHRISTIAN , Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris Cou nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 64777



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due July 9, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The
record has not been filed with the cou rt. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Gina Wilburn , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50601

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH WAYNE SIMPSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-96-CR-231-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

September 25, 1997

Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Joseph Wayne Simpson has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 3086 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
August 2, 2016 

Dear Mr. Barnes: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA-2016-1883). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

Per the Notice to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 Petitioners 

Regarding Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations, part 107 letter posted to your docket, we have reviewed your original 

request and found you will be able to operate under part 107 without further relief (Tier 1). Your 

petition will be closed and you will be able operate in accordance with part 107 on the effective 

date of August 29, 2016. 

However, we have identified a request to conduct operations outside of the United States. In 

addition to the applicable regulations of the foreign country, operators of U.S.-registered aircraft 

will need to seek relief from the provisions of Part 91, Subpart H of Title 14 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations to conduct operations outside of the United States. 

Please confirm your intention to pursue operations outside of the United States as a comment to 

your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information is submitted, please save your 

tracking number and submit your tracking number along with the information submitted to the 

docket via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 8/16/16. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
----

----

| (1) | The      Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June      30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date      hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.      78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Michael V. Shustek         |
|-------------------------------------|
| Michael      V. Shustek             |
| Chief      Executive Officer        |
| Vestin      Realty Mortgage I, Inc. |

| /s/      Rocio Revollo             |
|------------------------------------|
| Rocio      Revollo                 |
| Chief      Financial Officer       |
| Vestin      Realty Mortgage I,Inc. |
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5044]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, NHLBI Cardiovascular T32 Training 
Application.
    Date: March 23, 2012.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Charles Joyce, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7196, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 
301-435-0288, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c4f4643554f496c4244404e4502424544024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="50333a3f293335103e383c32397e3e39387e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 24, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-5044 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 60 

Supporting women’s reproductive health. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2013 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. BROWN, and 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting women’s reproductive health. 

Whereas access to comprehensive reproductive health care is 

critical to improving the health and well-being of women 

and their families; 

Whereas access to affordable contraceptives and medically accurate information prevents unintended pregnancies, 

thereby improving the health of women, children, families, and society as a whole; 

Whereas title X of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

300 et seq.) and the Medicaid program under title XIX 

of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.) cover 

health care and family planning services for millions of 

women and men who do not have other insurance coverage, with the Medicaid program alone covering 71 perVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:33 Feb 28, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR60.IS SR60

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 60 IS 

cent of publicly funded family planning services and more 

than 40 percent of all births in the United States; 

Whereas women need access to comprehensive, affordable insurance that covers family planning services, prenatal 

and postnatal care, miscarriage management, labor and 

delivery services, and abortion; and 

Whereas the lack of adequate prenatal care increases the 

risks of infant and maternal mortality and preterm birth, 

which cost our health care system approximately 

$26,000,000,000 annually: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports efforts to— 

2 (1) ensure that women have access to contra3 ception, other preventive services, and medically ac4 curate information necessary to make health care 

5 decisions; 

6 (2) ensure that the millions of women who rely 

7 on title X of the Public Health Service Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 300 et seq.), the Medicaid program under 

9 title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 

10 et seq.), and non-profit providers like Planned Par11 enthood continue to get cancer screenings, birth con12 trol, and other essential health care services; 

13 (3) ensure that women have access to afford14 able insurance coverage for all pregnancy-related 

15 health care needs; and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 60 IS 

1 (4) reduce health disparities between men and 

2 women and among women of different races, 

3 ethnicities, and sexual orientations. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES DIVERONICA,

Appellant,

v.

WELSS FARGO, N.A.,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2926

[May 19, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Nicholas Richard Lopane, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18-

020951.

Kenneth D. Cooper of Kenneth D. Cooper, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellant.

R. Shawn Hogue of K&L Gates LLP, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Order entered May 6, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00290-CR

No. 05-20-00292-CR

JAMES ARNAZ RANDLE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F17-30614-P & F17-30615-P

ORDER

Appellant’s notices of appeal were timely filed in the trial court on June 4, 

2018, but for unknown reasons, were not forwarded to this Court until March 3, 

2020. According to the docketing statement, the reporter’s record was requested 

on February 19, 2020. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed, and we 

have had no communication from court reporter Debi Harris.

We ORDER court reporter Debi Harris to file the complete reporter’s record 

in these appeals within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. 
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Raquel

Jones, Presiding Judge, 203rd Judicial District Court; Debi Harris, court reporter; 

Crystal Brown, official court reporter, 203rd Judicial District Court; and counsel 

for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 21.1 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Borland Software Corporation: In our opinion, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders equity and cash flows for each of two years in the period ended
December 31, 2007, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Borland Software Corporation and
its subsidiaries at December 31, 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule for each of the two years in the
period ended December 31, 2007 presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read
in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements
in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California

March 7, 2008, except for the effects of discontinued operations discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, as to which the date is March 5, 2009
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-60776

Summary Calendar

Freddis Balmore Castillo, 

Petitioner,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A090 472 547

Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Costa, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Freddis Balmore Castillo petitions this court to review a motion to 

reopen removal proceedings that was denied by the BIA. Castillo concedes 

that the motion is untimely but argues that equitable tolling should be applied 

because of new caselaw. See Monteon-Camargo v. Barr, 918 F.3d 423 (5th Cir.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 8, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-60776 Document: 00515890753 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2021
No. 19-60776

2

2019). He also argues that the 1999 removal order for conviction of driving 

while intoxicated, an aggravated felony, and for convictions of theft, a crime 

of moral turpitude, is invalidated by this case.

We lack jurisdiction to consider this petition because Castillo has not 

demonstrated a gross miscarriage of justice. See Ramirez-Molina v. Ziglar, 

436 F.3d 508, 513-14 (5th Cir. 2006). Monteon-Camargo does not change the 

law retrospectively with regards to removal orders based on criminal 

convictions. See Monteon-Camargo, 918 F.3d at 423. Moreover, Castillo has 

not demonstrated that his removal based on his theft convictions was clearly 

unlawful when the removal order was entered. See Gonzalez-Cantu v. 

Sessions, 866 F.3d 302, 306 (5th Cir. 2017); Matter of Umer, 2010 WL 

1606998 at *2 (BIA Mar. 31, 2010) (unpublished), denied in part and dismissed 

in part by Umer v. Holder, 417 F. App’x 403 (5th Cir. 2011), vacated on other 

grounds by Umer v. Holder, 565 U.S. 1105 (2012). Because Castillo attempts 

to rely on a case that did not change the law retroactively, and because he 

raises arguments against his theft convictions based on the law in place at the 

time his removal order was entered, he has not shown that he is entitled to 

equitable tolling. See Lugo-Resendez v. Lynch, 831 F.3d 337, 344 (5th Cir. 

2016). 

Because the theft convictions were sufficient to support Castillo’s 

removal, we do not address his arguments regarding his DWI conviction. 

Castillo also presents an argument regarding cancellation of removal, but he 

lacks the required legal status for that remedy to be considered and we do not 

have the power to confer that status upon him. 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a).

Finally, we note that Counsel denies the existence of a motion that he 

himself litigated before the BIA and this court. See Matter of Castillo, 

2014 WL 4966525 (BIA Sept. 15, 2014) (unpublished); Castillo v. Lynch, 

653 F. App’x 800-01 (5th Cir. 2016). We admonish counsel.

DISMISSED.

Case: 19-60776 Document: 00515890753 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/08/2021
EX-4.2






EXHIBIT 4.2




Incremental Assumption Agreement and Amendment No. 1 dated as of November 3, 2006, to the Credit
Agreement dated as of December 21, 2005, among Live Nation, Inc., Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. and
the Foreign Borrowers party thereto, as Borrowers, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative
Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Toronto Branch, as Canadian Agent, J.P. Morgan Europe Limited, as
London Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 of Live Nation, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 9, 2006)
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1338 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2010 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To require the accreditation of English language training 

programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1338 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. ACCREDITATION OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE 

2 TRAINING PROGRAMS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(a) of the Immigra4 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (15)(F)(i), by striking ‘‘a lan6 guage’’ and inserting ‘‘an accredited language’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(52) The term ‘accredited language training pro9 gram’ means a language training program that is accred10 ited by an accrediting agency recognized by the Secretary 

11 of Education.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

13 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para14 graph (2), the amendments made by subsection (a) 

15 shall— 

16 (A) take effect on the date that is 180 

17 days after the date of the enactment of this 

18 Act; and 

19 (B) apply with respect to applications for 

20 a nonimmigrant visa under section 

21 101(a)(15)(F)(i) of the Immigration and Na22 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(F)(i)) that 

23 are filed on or after the effective date described 

24 in subparagraph (A). 

25 (2) TEMPORARY EXCEPTION.— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

S 1338 RFH 

1 (A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sec2 tion 101(a)(15)(F)(i) of the Immigration and 

3 Nationality Act, as amended by subsection (a), 

4 during the 3-year period beginning on the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act, an alien seeking 

6 to enter the United States to pursue a course 

7 of study at a language training program that 

8 has been certified by the Secretary of Home9 land Security and has not been accredited or 

10 denied accreditation by an entity described in 

11 section 101(a)(52) of such Act may be granted 

12 a nonimmigrant visa under such section 

13 101(a)(15)(F)(i). 

14 (B) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT.—An 

15 alien may not be granted a nonimmigrant visa 

16 under subparagraph (A) if the sponsoring insti17 tution of the language training program to 

18 which the alien seeks to enroll does not— 

19 (i) submit an application for the ac20 creditation of such program to a regional 

21 or national accrediting agency recognized 

22 by the Secretary of Education within 1 

23 year after the date of the enactment of this 

24 Act; and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
4 

S 1338 RFH 

1 (ii) comply with the applicable accred2 iting requirements of such agency. 

Passed the Senate September 27, 2010. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Question 1
– Description of Process for Iron Ore Mining and Taconite Pellet Manufacturing

The mining operation at Babbitt includes the drilling, blasting, and coarse crushing of the crude taconite ore. Taconite is a hard, low

-grade iron ore containing iron oxide and silica. The iron oxide is magnetite, which is magnetic. The taconite ore sup plied to the coarse crusher is blended in order to meet processing requirements. This is accomplished through the proper selection of the blast sites at the mine and the truck deliveries to the coarse crusher. Ore is removed from the mine pit by shovels and loaded into haul trucks that dump the ore into the crusher. Primary and secondary coarse crushing crushes ore to minus 4 inch size chunks of ore. Crushed ore is conveyed to an ore load out bin that releases ore into railcars to be shipped on a compan y owned railroad 47 miles to the Northshore Silver Bay taconite processing facility. A portable aggregate crusher is also employed at the mine and is used to crush aggregate for blast stemming, drill pad construction, haul road surfacing, or railroad ball ast. Crushed ore received at the processing plant is unloaded with a rotary railcar dumper and conveyed to bins where it is housed until conveyed to the tertiary crushers. Tertiary crushing reduces the ore to

- 3/4 inch chunks. The crushed ore is convey ed to dry cobbers where larger non

- metallic chunks of ore are separated from chunks with higher iron ore content with magnetic separation. Cobbed ore is stored in bins until it proceeds to a series of rod and ball mills, magnetic separators, water hydraul ic separators, flotation cells, and regrind mills that serve to concentrate the ore to achieve an iron content of approximately 62.5%. The iron concentrate is pumped to a slurry tank. The coarse tailings produced by these processes are hauled by rail to Milepost 7 and used to build dams and roads. The fine tailings are pumped to and deposited in the tailings basin. Recycled water from the tailings basin meets the process water requirements for the plant at Silver Bay. The concentrate slurry of water and high

- grade iron oxide particles is dewatered using disk filters in the concentrate filtering building. This process produces a filter cake of optimum moisture content for balling in the pelletizing plant. The pelletizing plant provides the final stages o f processing taconite ore into high

-grade iron ore pellets. Prior to and in the balling drum circuit, additives such as bentonite clay, organic compounds, and limestone are mixed with the concentrate to improve the physical integrity of the green balls, o r pellets, before and during firing in the furnaces. The additives also enhance the properties of the finished fired pellets for use in the blast furnace operation, the first stage of steel making. After the balling drum circuit, the green pellets are con veyed to Furnace 5, 6, 11, or 12 . There they are dried, fired at progressively higher temperatures, and then cooled. The finished fired

- pellet product is conveyed through the pellet transfer area to the storage yard, a cooling pile or directly into bins and is then shipped to customers.