alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
**EXHIBIT 32

                                             SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

I, David E. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, certify that

         this periodic report containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of
         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
         that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects,
         the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

         Date: March 23, 2006

                                         /s/ David E. Johnson
                                         ----------------------------------
                                         David E. Johnson
                                         Chief Executive Officer

I, Donna T. Rutland, Chief Financial Officer, certify that

         this periodic report containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of
         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
         that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects,
         the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

         Date: March 23, 2006

                                         /s/ Donna T. Rutland
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Donna T. Rutland
                                         Chief Financial Officer
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Seven, Inc., (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of March 31, 2011, and for the period then ended.

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ GLADE M. KNIGHT     | 
|                        | 
|Glade M. Knight         | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|May 6, 2011             | 
|                        | 
|/s/ BRYAN PEERY         | 
|                        | 
|Bryan Peery             | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|                        | 
|May 6, 2011             | 

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

KAREN TURLEY and MICHAEL

TURLEY, )

)

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 14

- cv

- 00 0 4 (TSC)(AK)

)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, )

)

Defendant. )

)

ORDER

Upon careful consideration of the record in this case, Magistrate Judge Kay’s Report &

Recommendation (ECF No. 22 ), and having received no objections or responses to the

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation from either of the parties to this case

, the Court

hereby ADOPTS and ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation in full. It is therefore

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees (ECF No. 19 ) is GRANTED IN

PART and DENIED IN PART ; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiffs are awarded total fees and costs of $ 10,503.79, as calculated

at pages 11

- 12 of Magistrate Judge Kay’s Report & Recommendation ; and it is further

ORDERED that the Court retains jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of

enforcing the directives set forth in this orde r and resolving any disputes or other matters related

thereto

.

THIS IS A FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER.Date: November 18, 2015



## Tanya S. Chutkan

TANYA S. CHUTKAN

United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 62 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 62

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2013

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs.

Whereas, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 
        Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs conducted an investigation 
        into offshore profit shifting and the United States tax code;
Whereas, the Subcommittee has received a request from a federal law enforcement 
        agency for access to records of the Subcommittee's investigation;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the 
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs, acting jointly, are authorized to 
provide to law enforcement officials, regulatory agencies, and other 
entities or individuals duly authorized by federal, state, or foreign 
governments, records of the Subcommittee's investigation into offshore 
profit shifting and the United States tax code.
                                 <all>
```
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 0052 9

- CR

Anthony Devern Session

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 371st District Court

o f Tarr ant County (130 284 7 D )

April 3 , 2014

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

_______________________ Justice Bill Meier
Chemical Structure 

SubsLance No. 2 

[ X ] entlre page is CB1
Exhibit 10.1

Erwin
J. Goede
Vice President and PresidentChemicals Europe, Asia and Australia

April 23,
2007

Dear
Erwin:

This
letter is being presented to you in acknowledgement of your on-going contribution and efforts in helping implement PQ's strategic ownership alternatives and your
continued positive cooperation during this process.

The
PQ Board of Directors has approved my request to make you eligible for a one time special payment in the amount of $200,000 as follows.



This
special payment does not change any other conditions of your employment with PQ, as it is considered an extraordinary event tied solely to a Change of Control or an IPO actually
taking place. As such, it will not be treated as normal compensation for purposes of calculating compensation driven benefits (i.e. Pensionable Earnings, 401k match etc.).

Should
you decide to leave PQ voluntarily prior to the date of payment, you will not receive this special payment.

On
behalf of the PQ Board and me personally, thank you for your past efforts. I look forward to your continued positive contributions towards the future success of PQ.

Sincerely,

|/s/MICHAEL R. BOYCEMichael R. Boyce Chairman and
CEO |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

906 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

|(1) |  | The
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2005,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|      |                        
|----- | -----------------------
|     
|     
|Date: | November 29, 2005      
|      | President and          
|      | Chief Executive Officer

| |                             
| | ----------------------------
|
|
| |                             
| | Executive Vice President and
| | Chief Financial Officer     

---
OFFICE **OF** THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF **TEXAS** AUSTIN

Bonorrblo Vi’.Loo O’Danirl Governor of Taxar Aurtin, Tsrar Dear Oovornor OIDanlrl:
eeoond thir

“1 have been Info one Harry Lacy was giv murdet by the is ty, Texas, and t, July le.) 1939. Bald Harry Lao tion in acoor Constitution oution date into-d th are also been by the United

d that on Ootober e writ or certiorari, rrstanding that on Noorre-eentenoed and given l Dlstriot Court or Pantthe exeoutfon date 8et for

e foregoing information I would like or or not I hare the authority under 3ection 11, Artiole 4, Comtitution or Texas, to grant Harry Laoy another thirty (30) day 8tay of oxsoution.w The applicable part O?Artiale 4, Section 11, Of the Constitution of Texas (which was adopted at eleotion Rovsmbber3, 1936) roads:Konorablr :V.Lee OIDanlol, Page 2

‘The Covernor shall have thr power to grant one 

### reprfera in 

### any oapltal oam 

### rora period not 

### toexceedthirty 

### (30)day8; 

### , . ." As statad in your latter, you have already exercfeed the power siren you by thla constitutional provision to grant wone reprieve*. The Laot that a petition for writ of Certiorari has been denied by the Unltrd State8 supreme Court in the aeantinm doe8 not conetituto thir a dirrerent “oapital ease” rrom the one in which you granted Harry Laoy a thirty (30) day atay of exoaution on July 11, 1939. It is, thererom, our opinion that you do not have authority to grant Harry Lacy another thirty (30) day stay of exeoution. Yours very truly ATTOl-NEY

GD??RAL

OF'TEXAS

AX’EOVXD DEC. 12, 1939 (signed) Gerald C. Mmn AT’TORNEY CZIERALOF TEXAS APXQ?XDOPIXIONC OXITTEE SY9. Y. 3. CPAIR%N. By (:signed) V!alter R. Koch Walter R. Koch Assistant
Exhibit
      31.2




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Mary
      Desmond, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
      30, 2007, of Techprecision Corporation;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible
      for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
      in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
      have:





a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have
      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
      financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
      registrant’s board of directors:





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated:
              November 14, 2007
            
            /s/
              Mary
              DesmondMary
                  Desmond
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
#### Thomas E. HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Perry M. JOHNSON, Jr., Clerk 19th Judicial District Court of East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 76-1992

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 23, 1976.

Thomas E. Hill, pro se.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, La., for defendant-appellee.

Before CLARK, TJOFLAT and HILL, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see *Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al.,*5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas E. Hill, appellant, is confined in a Texas prison for causes unrelated to the present litigation. Pleading 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 as a jurisdictional basis, Hill sued the Clerk of the 19th Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, Louisiana, seeking to have a 1956 felony conviction in that court declared constitutionally invalid and to have it expunged from the Court’s records.1 2The complaint specifically states that the sentence from that conviction has been satisfied and that he is no longer under any form of restraint pursuant to that conviction.

The district court treated the suit as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies.

The characterization of the appellant’s complaint as a petition for habeas corpus is incorrect. There is no restraint on appellant sufficient to satisfy the “in custody” requirement of 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. *440The sole function of the writ is to grant relief from unlawful imprisonment or custody, and it cannot be used properly for any other purpose. *Pierre v. United States,*525 F.2d 933 (5th Cir. 1976).

Nevertheless, on the basis of *Carter v. Hardy,*526 F.2d 314 (5th Cir. 1976), we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

1

. There was no prayer for monetary relief in the complaint, and we pretermit consideration of the immunity issue. *See Qualls v. Shaw,*535 F.2d 318 (5th Cir. 1976).
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40601

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EULALIO MOLINA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:15-CR-1106-1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eulalio Molina has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Molina has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40601 Document: 00513805066 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 16-40601

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40601 Document: 00513805066 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court No. DA - 22 - 0054

__________________________________________________________________ SHANDOR S. BADARUDDIN,

Appellant, v. THE STATE OF MONTANA, and the NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, HONORABLE MATTHEW CUFFE, Presiding.

Appellees.

__________________________________________________________________ **ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF**  **CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS TO FILE BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE** 

__________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of the Motion of Amicus Curiae , the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, (NACDL) , and with no objection from the parties, Appellant Shandor S. Badaruddin , and Appellees State of Montana and the Nineteenth Judicial District Court , and good cause appearing therefore, said Motion is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to file the Amicus Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defe nse Lawyers attached to the Motion.

Electronically signed below:

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 5 2022

10/05/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0054
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12279-12280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4792]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14184-000; Project No. 14191-000]


Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XXXVIII; FFP Project 1, LLC; Notice 
Announcing Filing Priority for Preliminary Permit Applications

    On February 22, 2012, the Commission held a drawing to determine 
priority among competing preliminary permit applications with identical 
filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that none of 
the applicants' plans are better adapted than the others to develop, 
conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the 
region at issue, the priority established by this drawing will serve as 
the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order of priority is as 
follows:
    1. Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XXXVIII, Project No. 14184-000.
    2. FFP Project 1, LLC, Project No. 14191-000.


[[Page 12280]]


    Dated: February 22, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4792 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                            LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF
                             WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                % of Securities
                                                                Owned by
Name                                    Incorporated            Immed. Parent
--------------------------------------  ----------------------  ---------------
<S>                                     <C>                     <C>
West Point-Pepperell Enterprises, Inc.  Delaware                   100%
   J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc.             Delaware                   100%
     WestPoint Stevens (Canada) Ltd.    Canada                     100%
      J.P. Stevens Enterprises, Inc.    Delaware                   100%
   Alamac Holdings Inc.                 Delaware                   100%
     Alamac Sub Holdings Inc.           Delaware                   100%
WestPoint Stevens Stores Inc.           Georgia                    100%
WestPoint Stevens (UK) Limited          England                    100%
   WestPoint Stevens (Europe) Limited   England                    100%
     Artway Designs Limited             England                    100%
     Lexward Properties Limited         England                    100%
     P.J. Flower Inc.                   New Jersey                 100%
WPS Receivables Corporation             Delaware                   100%
WPSI Inc.                               Delaware                   100%
WestPoint Stevens (Asia) Inc.           British Virgin Islands     100%
</TABLE>


                                       45
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          55,975
<SECURITIES>                                    34,262
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,136
<INVENTORY>                                     67,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               238,462
<PP&E>                                          56,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 284,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,159
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           217
<OTHER-SE>                                     197,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   284,543
<SALES>                                        206,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,914
<CGS>                                           98,416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  124,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,247<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 988
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,274
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,835
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,439
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,439
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57
<FN>
<F1>EXCLUDES SG&A AS SG&A IS PART OF 5-03(b)(4).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>