alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1759-1760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31649]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR PART 52

[FRL-9767-5]

Notice of Approval of Clean Air Act Outer Continental Shelf Minor 
Source/Title V Minor Permit Modification Issued to Shell Offshore, Inc. 
for the Kulluk Conical Drilling Unit

AGENCY: United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces that EPA Region 10 has issued a final 
decision granting Shell Offshore Inc.'s (``Shell'') request for minor 
modifications of Clean Air Act Outer Continental Shelf (``OCS'') Minor 
Source/Title V Permit No. R10OCS03000 (``permits''). The permits 
authorize air emissions associated with Shell's operation of the Kulluk 
Conical Drilling Unit (``Kulluk'') in the Beaufort Sea to conduct 
exploratory oil and gas drilling.

DATES: January 9, 2013.

ADDRESSES: The documents relevant to the above-referenced permits are 
available for public inspection during normal business hours at the 
following address: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 
1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, AWT-107, Seattle, WA 98101. To arrange 
for viewing of these documents, call Natasha Greaves at (206) 553-7079.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Natasha Greaves, Office of Air Waste 
and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 6th 
Avenue, Suite 900, AWT-107, Seattle, WA 98101.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA Region 10 issued a final decision on the 
minor modifications of the permits on September 28, 2012. The modified 
permits also became effective on that date, and the 30-day period 
provided by 40 CFR 71.11(l) to file with the Environmental Appeals 
Board (``EAB'')

[[Page 1760]]

a petition to review the minor modifications of the permits ended on 
October 29, 2012. Pursuant to section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 
42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1), judicial review of these final permit decisions, 
to the extent it is available, may be sought by filing a petition for 
review in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 
within 60 days of January 9, 2013.
    On April 12, 2012, EPA issued a final decision on the permits which 
authorize air emissions from Shell's operation of the Kulluk in the 
Beaufort Sea to conduct exploratory drilling. Shell submitted an 
application to EPA Region 10 requesting minor modifications of the 
permits on July 5, 2012. EPA Region 10 reviewed and issued the 
requested minor modifications of the permits on September 28, 2012.
    All conditions of the Kulluk permit, issued by EPA on September 28, 
2012, are final and effective.

    Dated: November 6, 2012.
Kate Kelly,
Director, Office of Air, Waste & Toxics, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2012-31649 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Terms of Employment of Lisa Klinger



 Exhibit 10.7 

Terms of Employment of Lisa Klinger 
  

	 	1.	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer – reporting to Craig Carlock, President and Chief Executive Officer. The Vice Presidents of Finance and
Business Strategy/IT will report directly to Ms. Klinger. 

  

	 	2.	 Starting date of March 23, 2009 with a Salary of $330,000/year. 



 

	 	3.	 “Target” Bonus of 35% of Salary with a minimum first year guarantee of $50,000. 



 

	 	4.	 2009 Shadow Equity Bonus (SEB) awards of $200,000 and $100,000 under terms provided under separate cover. 



 

	 	5.	 On Ms. Klinger’s first year anniversary, as long as she remains in good standing, the company will offer her the ability to purchase 1% of the
company at a price determined by a valuation methodology that is no less favorable than the Possible Principal Terms provided under separate cover. 


  

	 	6.	 TFM will pay for all reasonable and customary relocation costs either directly or via documented reimbursement to Ms. Klinger, up to $100,000.



  

	 	7.	 Signing Bonus of $100,000 to be paid within 30 days of Ms. Klinger’s start date. If Ms. Klinger leaves voluntarily or is terminated for cause
within one year, she must repay the entire amount of the bonus. If she leaves voluntarily or is terminated for cause between her first and second year of employment, she must repay the applicable prorata portion remaining (i.e., $100,000 X (730 days
- days worked)/730 days). 


  

	 	8.	 Benefit/401(k) information has been sent to Ms. Klinger’s personal email. Our 401(k) plan requires a 12 month waiting period until eligible.
Ms. Klinger will be entitled to participate in our Exec-u-Care program. 


  

	 	9.	 Ms. Klinger will be entitled to a company car not to exceed a $65,000 all-in cost to the company. 



 

	 	10.	 TFM will pay for weekly travel from Dallas to Greensboro from March 23 – June 12 and provide short-term housing.



  

	 	11.	 Ms. Klinger will be entitled to seventeen vacation days/year. 



 

	 	12.	 TFM will pay for up to two family trips to Greensboro.
#### Indian River State Bank, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The Home Insurance Company, *Defendant in Error.*

This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Brevard county.

*Geo. M. Robbins*and *Geo. P. Raney*for plaintiff in • error.

*A. W. Cockrell & Son*for defendant in error.

*339Per Curiam.

The above stated cause coming on for final disposition before Division A of the court upon the transcript of record and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, after due consideration the court finds that the case made in the transcript of record- is substantially the same in all material particulars as that of the Indian River State Bank as plaintiff in error against the Hartford Fire Insurance Company, as defendant in error decided by written opinion by Division A of the court at the present term, in which substantially the same questions were presented as are involved in the present case, and that what is said in that case is fully decisive of the questions presented in this case. It is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the* judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby reversed with directions to overrule the demurrer of the defendant insurance company to the last amended declaration of the plaintiff below, the Indian River State Bank, and to sustain the demurrer of the said plaintiff to the pleas of the defendant in all such particulars wherein such pleas may be inconsistent with the views expressed in tbe said opinion of this court in the said-case of the *Indian River State Bank v. The Hartford Fire Insurance Company*herein above referred to, and for such further proceedings as shall be consonant with law. The costs of this appellate proceeding to be taxed against the defendant in error.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133494 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133494 COA: 262054 Jackson CC: 03-000128-FC PHILIP CRAIG THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk
#### Leroy F. PRIDAY, Petitioner, v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Respondent.

No. 86SC268.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Sept. 8, 1987.

*322Lozow, Lozow and Elliott, Charles W. Elliott, Karen A. Chaney, Denver, for petitioner.

Donald E. Mielke, Dist. Atty., E. Ronald Beeks, Laura K. Dunbar, Deputy Dist. At-tys., Golden, for respondent.

Charles H. Richardson, Claybourne M. Douglas, Aurora, amicus curiae for City of Aurora.

QUINN, Chief Justice.

We granted Leroy F. Priday’s petition for certiorari to consider whether the District Court of Jefferson County erred in holding that the compulsory joinder statute, § 18-1-408(2), 8B C.R.S. (1986), does not prohibit successive prosecutions in municipal and county courts for separate offenses based on the same act or series of acts arising from the same criminal episode. Priday was charged in Lakewood Municipal Court with assault in violation of section 9.020.010 of the Lakewood Municipal Code and in Jefferson County Court with driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of section 42-4-, 1202(l)(a), 17 C.R.S. (1984). Both charges arose out of a single criminal episode. After entering a guilty plea to assault in the Lakewood Municipal Court, Priday filed a motion in Jefferson County Court to dismiss the charge of driving under the influence on the basis that the prosecution for this offense was barred by the compulsory joinder statute, § 18-1-408, 8B C.R.S. (1986). The county court granted Priday’s motion, but the district court reversed the judgment of dismissal and remanded the case to the county court for further proceedings.

Our holding in *People v. Wright,*742 P.2d 316 (Colo.1987), announced today, is dispositive of this case. The compulsory joinder statute has no application where the initial prosecution in a municipal court was for a municipal ordinance violation and a subsequent prosecution in a state court is for a state offense based on conduct different from the ordinance violation, even though both the municipal ordinance violation and the state offense arose out of the same criminal episode. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Annual Report of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K, as amended, for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods reflected therein.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 6, 2007 |  | /s/ Donald R. Walsh    
|                    |  | Donald R. Walsh        
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                    | 
|                    |  | /s/ Lawrence Rychlak   
|                    |  | Lawrence Rychlak       
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 21.1



BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION



SUBSIDIARIES*



|                                       |  |                             
|-------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name                                   |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation
|BORLAND (FRANCE)                       |  | France                      
|BORLAND (H.K.) LIMITED                 |  | Hong Kong                   
|BORLAND (JAPAN) CO., LTD.              |  | Japan                       
|BORLAND (SINGAPORE) PTE., LTD.         |  | Singapore                   
|BORLAND (UK) LIMITED                   |  | United Kingdom              
|BORLAND AUSTRALIA PTY LTD.             |  | Australia                   
|BORLAND B.V.                           |  | The Netherlands             
|BORLAND CANADA, INC.                   |  | Canada                      
|BORLAND GMBH                           |  | Germany                     
|BORLAND KOREA LTD.                     |  | Korea                       
|BORLAND LATIN AMERICA LTDA.            |  | Brazil                      
|BORLAND NEW ZEALAND LIMITED            |  | New Zealand                 
|BORLAND SOFTWARE (BEIJING) CO., LTD.   |  | China                       
|BORLAND SOFTWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED |  | India                       
|BORLAND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION         |  | Delaware                    
|BORLAND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION         |  | Russia                      
|STARBASE CORPORATION                   |  | Delaware                    

---

|* | Excludes some subsidiaries that do not fall under definition of Significant Subsidiary as defined under Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.01 MB)

Tags:DLA, Awards, DLA DISTRUBUTION, Team Rally

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 134 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 134

 To amend the National Trails System Act to clarify Federal authority 
relating to land acquisition from willing sellers for the North Country 
                         National Scenic Trail.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2009

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Trails System Act to clarify Federal authority 
relating to land acquisition from willing sellers for the North Country 
                         National Scenic Trail.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``North Country National Scenic Trail 
Willing Seller Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE LAND FROM WILLING SELLERS FOR THE NORTH 
              COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(8)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``No land or 
interest in land outside the exterior boundaries of any federally 
administered area may be acquired by the Federal Government for the 
trail except with the consent of the owner of the land or interest in 
land.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Edison CROWLEY, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 860341.

Supreme Court of Utah.

April 22, 1987.

John R. Bucher, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Earl F. Dorius, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

PER CURIAM:

The record before us indicates that defendant was convicted of rape, a first degree felony. On March 17, 1986, defendant filed a motion to arrest judgment or to enter judgment on reduced charges. On May 12, he filed an amended motion for a new trial. An unsigned minute entry was filed on June 10, 1986, granting defendant an additional thirty days to appear at the Utah County jail for transportation to the Utah State Prison. No judgment or sentence appears of record.

An unsigned minute entry does not constitute a final order for purposes of appeal. *199
      *South Salt Lake v.*R. Utah S.Ct. 3(a); *Burton,*718 P.2d 405 (Utah 1986).

Appeal dismissed.
Page 1 of 6
 

 

 

 

Page 2 of 6
 

 

 

 

Page 3 of 6
Page 4 of 6
 

 

Page 5 of 6
 

Page 6 of 6
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

%anorrhle C. E. Cstaess 

State Auditor 

Austin, Texas 

Dear klx . Camesar 

ve hare gitaii 0 

letter of Septeder 20 ,-’ 1 

ear lssl, they 

opinion as to whether 

.oo ii-cm the books of the 

State Treasury Deya.rtntsnt . If he does 

not, how em suoh clearance be mdeTa 

Under the Escbeat Law, aa it exlated in l%%l, 

it V;LS speciPically provided that, whera any property 

in mesas zzs in existence to rh-ich no perscm olaixt& an 

intsrest, the L)istrict Attcrney or Ccrunty Attorney could 

bring s-nit an2 h37e smrd3 esoheattv% to the State, and provliled that the judgisni af the court shnnld place the 

title to ssi:l proptwty in the Stats. %e presume that the 
111. 

tmo notes describe4 in your letter were under said statutes 

deer.eod to be the propeTty of the State of Texas. 

The note for $275.50, a copy of a1ti.i.h is sbtacher? 

to gour letter, shcws that it wss dated F3wuary 12, ly6¶, 

and is poyzble to Phurmart and Zatscn, anil has a w&it 

thereon of $lSo.oU, of date Bcbruarg 13, 1881, and ia signed by J. Ii. Stevena. 

?h% note Por $~O~.QCJ is dsted April 8, Will, and' 

Is payable to XI. %. Diadericl, and has a eredlt of $r)S.c6 

thereon as of date February 20 tb, and is signed by L. I. % . 

lamis. 

These netes are uore than eighty-eight years past 

due, and unquestionaly t&e signers to the notes hate long 

since passed to their renard. Horcver, there is no way 

fcr the account to be olosed and SWSC should be csrricd on 

the books.
RB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0256

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHARLES DAVID AMENT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including October 19, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 13 2024

08/13/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0256
In the matter of: BRIANWALLAESA BRIAN A WALLAESA
) ) ) ) ) ) ) FDMS No. FAA-2010-0628 Case No. 201OWP190018 Hon. Ronnie A. Yoder 

## -------------------------) Requested information by Administrative Law Judge in respect to Complaint Filed July 28,2010 C-I rn -0 N o )? 

### .p 1·

Brian Wallaesa (Respondent) herby files an answer to the Administrative Law Judge regarding complaintFiled July 28,2010. I. Respondentmakes note that the proper contact number for the Respondent is (570) 778-1335. II. Respondent proposes the following information to be considered ifthe case continues forward. Respondentproposes that by November 15, 2010 all stipulations, lists ofwitnesses, testimony should be submitted. Respondent also proposes that by December 6,2010 all exhibits and discovery shall be exchanged. Respondent proposes thatthe hearing site be located in Washington, D.C.

Dated September 17, 2010 Respectfully;>ulrmittedl 

### //"'?' -''7**~:"** ,-'/ -/ ,/"" 

### /

- </,{-';/.

# /Ifrf~w**al6esa----·~-·····** Respondent 11272 Wortbam Crest Circle Manassas, VA 20109 (570) 778-1335 ., ,"