alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4616]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 14, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Perry Hodgson, Alexander Hodgson, and Raymond Hodgson, all of 
Charlevoix, Michigan; to join the existing Hodgson control group and to 
retain and acquire voting shares of Charlevoix First Corporation, and 
indirectly retain and acquire voting shares of Charlevoix State Bank, 
Charlevoix, Michigan.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 23, 
2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-4616 Filed 2-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

Octob er 6, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00179

- CV

Rodney WARRIOR, Appellant

v.

Maria Cristina WARRIOR

, Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CI07193 Honorable Monique Diaz , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On September 26 , 202 2

, appellant timely filed a motion requesting a n extension of time to file appellant’s brief

. On October 3, 2022, appellant filed an amended motion containing a certificate of service and certificate of conference. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due no later tha n December 15 , 202 2

. Further requests for extensions of time will be d isfavored.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of October, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
_____________ No. 95-3977NE

_____________ Terry L. Christianson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Nebraska. Robert P. Houston; Attorney * General, State of Nebraska, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: May 13, 1996 Filed: May 22, 1996

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Terry L. Christianson appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Initially, we reject Christianson's contentio n that Nebraska's robbery statute is constitutionally ambiguous. Havin g rejectedChristianson's constitutional claim, we conclude Christianson' s trial and appellate c ounsel were not ineffective for failing to challenge the statute's constitutionality. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4798]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 14178-000, 14190-000]


Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLVII FFP Project 52, LLC; Notice 
Announcing Filing Priority for Preliminary Permit Applications

    On February 22, 2012, the Commission held a drawing to determine 
priority among competing preliminary permit applications with identical 
filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that none of 
the applicants' plans are better adapted than the others to develop, 
conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the 
region at issue, the priority established by this drawing will serve as 
the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order of priority is as 
follows:
    1. Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLVII, Project No. 14178-000.
    2. FFP Project 52, LLC, Project No. 14190-000.

    Dated: February 22, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4798 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1372 

To provide a vehicle maintenance building to house the Smithsonian Institution’s Vehicle Maintenance Branch at the Suitland Collections Center 

in Suitland, Maryland. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 25, 2009 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. COCHRAN, and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules 

and Administration 

A BILL 

To provide a vehicle maintenance building to house the 

Smithsonian Institution’s Vehicle Maintenance Branch 

at the Suitland Collections Center in Suitland, Maryland. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING. 

4 The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution 

5 is authorized to plan, design, and construct a vehicle main6 tenance building at its Vehicle Maintenance Branch in 

7 Suitland, Maryland, to house, maintain, and repair Smith8 sonian vehicles and transportation equipment. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 1372 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 There are authorized to be appropriated $4,000,000 

3 for fiscal year 2010 for the purposes described in section 

4 1. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Roger Arnet, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of WestCoast Golf
     Experiences, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
26th day of February, 2007.


/s/ Roger Arnet
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 354 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should leave 

no member of the Armed Forces unaccounted for during the drawdown 

of forces in Afghanistan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2014 

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. BURR, and Mr. CASEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States 

should leave no member of the Armed Forces unaccounted for during the drawdown of forces in Afghanistan. 

Whereas the United States is a country of great honor and 

integrity; 

Whereas the United States has made a sacred promise to 

members of the Armed Forces who are deployed overseas 

in defense of this country that their sacrifice and service 

will never be forgotten; and 

Whereas the United States can never thank the proud members of the Armed Forces enough for what they do for 

this country on a daily basis: Now, therefore, be it 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 354 IS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) believes that the United States should un3 dertake every reasonable effort— 

4 (A) to find and repatriate members of the 

5 Armed Forces who are missing; and 

6 (B) to repatriate members of the Armed 

7 Forces who are captured; 

8 (2) believes that the United States has a re9 sponsibility to keep the promises made to members 

10 of the Armed Forces who risk their lives on a daily 

11 basis on behalf of the people of the United States; 

12 (3) supports the United States Soldier’s Creed 

13 and the Warrior Ethos, which state that ‘‘I will 

14 never leave a fallen comrade’’; and 

15 (4) believes that, while the United States con16 tinues to transition leadership roles in combat oper17 ations in Afghanistan to the people of Afghanistan, 

18 the United States must continue to fulfill these im19 portant promises to any member of the Armed 

20 Forces who is in a missing status or captured as a 

21 result of service in Afghanistan now or in the future. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 508 

Commemorating the centennial anniversary of the establishment of the 

Congressional Research Service. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 17, 2014 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the centennial anniversary of the 

establishment of the Congressional Research Service. 

Whereas, in 1914, Congress recognized the need for greater 

assistance and established a reference unit within the Library of Congress to support an informed and independent legislature; 

Whereas the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970 (2 

U.S.C. 28 et seq.) transformed the Legislative Reference 

Service into the Congressional Research Service, expanding its size and analytic capacity; 

Whereas the Congressional Research Service is housed within 

the Library of Congress and benefits from the unparalleled collections of the Library of Congress to complete 

research and analysis and to disseminate information and 

materials to assist Congress; 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 508 ATS 

Whereas Congressional Research Service products are the result of collaboration between a diverse workforce consisting of analysts, attorneys, information professionals, 

and support staff; 

Whereas the Congressional Research Service strives to provide accurate and objective assistance to all members and 

committees at all stages of the legislative process, and in 

a timely, confidential, and non-partisan manner; and 

Whereas the Congressional Research Service provides Congress with analysis and information on legislative and 

oversight issues in reports, memoranda, seminars, and 

briefings: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the centennial anniversary of the 

3 establishment of the Congressional Research Service 

4 and commends the employees of the Congressional 

5 Research Service for their service to Congress and 

6 the people of the United States; and 

7 (2) respectfully requests the Secretary of the 

8 Senate to transmit an enrolled copy of this resolu9 tion to— 

10 (A) the Librarian of Congress; and 

11 (B) the Director of the Congressional Re12 search Service. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NAICS Description Companies

Number of 

Establishments

325199 All Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing 539 700

325211 Plastics Material and Resin Manufacturing 794 1,059

325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing 1,079 1,223

321219 Reconstituted wood product MFG 177 282

321211 Hardwood veneer & plywood MFG 303 337

321911 Wood window & door MFG 1,326 1,443

321918 Other millwork (including flooring) 2,016 2,071

321991 Manufactured home (mobile home) MFG 237 416

321992 Prefabricated wood building MFG 667 739

337110 Wood kitchen cabinet & counter top MFG 9,457 9,561

337121 Upholstered household furniture MFG 1,686 1,911

337122 Nonupholstered wood household furniture MFG 3,975 4,114

337127 Institutional furniture MFG 687 731

337129 Wood television, radio, & sewing machine cabinet MFG 201 205

337211 Wood office furniture MFG 547 570

337212 Custom architectural woodwork & millwork MFG 1,543 1,568

337215 Showcase, partition, shelving, & locker MFG 1,795 1,891

Chemical and Resin Manufacturing

Downstream Product MFG

CWP Manufacturing
Production 

Workers

Aggregate 

Production Hours 

Worked (1,000)

Average Production 

Workers per Site

Average Production 

Days per Year 

(assuming 8 hr/day)

Average Production Hours 

per Day (assuming 250 

days/yr)

40,771 84,466 58 259 8.29

48,002 99,003 45 258 8.25

21,950 44,356 18 253 8.08

17,967 38,383 64 267 8.55

16,861 34,298 50 254 8.14

55,566 106,720 39 240 7.68

35,989 69,325 17 241 7.71

40,290 75,296 97 234 7.48

18,472 36,193 25 245 7.84

100,210 195,053 10 243 7.79

77,284 145,105 40 235 7.51

95,890 184,861 23 241 7.71

24,557 48,944 34 249 7.97

2,827 5,767 14 255 8.16

19,230 36,877 34 240 7.67

23,080 45,310 15 245 7.85

53,283 102,777 28 241 7.72

and Resin Manufacturing

stream Product MFG

WP Manufacturing
Link to Source

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i325199t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i325211t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i325998t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i321219t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i321211t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i321911t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i321918t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i321991t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i321992t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i337110t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i337121t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i337122t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i337127t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i337129t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i337211t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i337212t.pdf

http://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0231i337215t.pdf
1 1 Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases

on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."

Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 95-10244

Summary Calendar

_____________________________________

MELVIN JOSHUA DELANEY

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

SHAWN KELM, Lt

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:94 CV 1230 AH)

______________________________________________________

July 31, 1995

Before DUHÉ, WIENER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Appellant Delaney, a Texas state prisoner, sued Deputy Sheriff

Kelm under § 1983 alleging use of excessive force. The parties

agreed to trial by a magistrate judge who granted summary judgment

for Defendant. We affirm.

In the order of reference the district court recited that any

appeal from the judgment rendered by the magistrate judge would lie

in the district court. This was error. It is the agreement of the
2

parties which governs. Oliver v. Collins, 904 F.2d 278, 280 (5th

Cir. 1990), 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The parties did not agree to

appeal to the district court so the general rule applies and appeal

to this court is correct.

Appellant contends that it was error for the court to grant

summary judgment because he did not have an opportunity to respond

to it. Seven months after the suit was filed, Defendant moved for

summary judgment. About three weeks later the judge ruled and

granted the motion. The following day Appellant asked for more

time to respond which request was denied as untimely. Appellant

was entitled to ten days to respond to the motion under Rule 56(c).

He was afforded more than that. We find no abuse of discretion.

The record amply supports the summary judgment. Defendant

submitted affidavits fully documenting the use of force incident

which make it clear that the force was not excessive and was

necessary. Appellant submitted nothing in opposition. He claims

in this Court, by way of a motion to supplement the record, that he

was precluded from submitting information from the infirmary

records because the rules of the Northern District prohibit the

filing into the record of the results of discovery. We deny his

motion, however, because the rules, while they do not permit the

routine filing of discovery matter, specifically provide for the

filing into the record of matter discovered which is relied upon in

opposition to a motion for summary judgment. We note in passing

that the material, even if considered, goes to the severity of the

alleged injury and not to the reasonableness or necessity of the
3

force. This record makes clear that the force was applied in a

good faith effort to restore discipline and not maliciously or

sadistically to cause harm. Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 6-7

(1992).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 78 (Friday, April 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 21246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9598]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, May 28, 2010.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-9598 Filed 4-21-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
OFFICE OFCHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION MEMORANDUM DATE: December21, 2010 SUBJECT: Methyl Bromide, PC Code 053201, DP Barcode 383515; Health Effects Division (HED), Review ofLogistical Infonnation Submitted 

### By Methyl Bromide Industry Panel Related To Post-Fumigation Aeration Activities PC Code: 053201 DP Barcode: D383515 Decision No.: 345514 Re2istration No.: varied Pelilian No.: N/A Re2ulalorv Action: RED Follow UD Risk Assessment Type: Review of

....'Orker activity Case No.: N/A information TXR No.: N/A CAS No.: 74-83-9 MRlD No.: 48267)-01 40 CFR: N/A FROM: Jeffrey L. Dawson, ChemistIRisk Assess Registration Action Branch 7 Health Effects Division (7509P) THROUGH: Michael Metzger. Chief Registration Action Branch 7 Health Effects Division (7509P) TO: Susan Bartow, Chemical Review Manager Pesticide Reevaluation Division (7508P) The Methyl Bromide Industry Panel (MBIP) submitted information attempting to document logistical and economic post-fumigation aeration factors related to current methyl bromide commodity fumigation practices and the potential impacton those practices shouldthe target aeration airconcentration level be reduced from 5 ppm for methyl bromidecommodity fumigations. I This action was inresponse to a March 23,2010 letterto MBIP from EPA indicating a possiblereduction in the aeration level for methyl bromide treated commodities from 5 to I ppm. The submission also noted (I) a workerexposure study required under aJuly 22, 2009 Data Calf-III for the post-harvest uses ofmethyl bromide that MBIP is committed to completing in atimely manner, (2) it would be "prudent" to wait until the study is completed to define risk managementprocedures, and (3) a September22,2010 conference call between MBIP and EPA that discussed recentefforts by the CaliforniaDepanment ofPesticide Regulation on related issues and a proposal to manage exposures by the Chilean fruit industry. This documenthas been reviewed within the contextofthe stated purposebut ithas also considered these otherpertinent issues/efforts as appropriate.

I EPA MRID482761-01, MBJP (10119/10) Methyl Bromide COltwwdiry Fumigatiolls: LogisticalandEconomic Factors Related To Post-FwnigariOlIAeratioll Page I 017
PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT

Rule 102. Definitions.
( a) General Rule.

-- Subject to additional definitions contained in subsequent provisions of these rules which are applicable to specific provisions of these rules, the following words and phrases when used in these rules shall have, unless the context clearly indicates other wise, the meanings given to them in this rule:

***
“Experienced hearing committee member.” An attorney who at the time is a member of the panel of hearing committee members in a disciplinary district and who has served on at least one hearing committee th at has conducted a hearing into formal charges of misconduct by a respondent

- attorney or a hearing on a petition for re instatement fr o m discipline by a petitioner

- attorney

.

***
“Senior hearing committee member.” An attorney who at the time is a member of the panel of hearing committee members in a disciplinary district and who has served either (i) as a member of the Board, or (ii) on at least two hearing committees that have

co nducted hearings into formal charges of misconduct by respondent

- attorney s or hearings on petition s for r einstatement fr o m discipline by petit io ner - attorneys

.