alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

               NOVELIS APPOINTS NEW INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS TO BOARD

    ATLANTA, Dec. 26 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Novelis Inc. (NYSE: NVL)
(TSX: NVL) today announced that it has appointed two new independent
directors, Patrick J. Monahan and Sheldon Plener, to its Board of Directors.
Mr. Monahan is Dean of the Osgoode Hall Law School of York University,
Toronto.  Mr. Plener is a senior partner with the Toronto law firm of Cassels
Brock & Blackwell LLP.

    The appointments take effect immediately and will continue until Novelis'
annual meeting in 2007. These appointments bring the current number of Board
members to 13.

    Patrick Monahan has been a Professor of Law at Osgoode Hall Law School since
1982 and was appointed Dean in 2003. Additionally, he is an Affiliated Scholar
with Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP, providing legal advice and opinions to
leading Canadian corporations and private sector organizations. He is also a
member of the Board of Governors of the Law Commission of Ontario. Mr. Monahan
holds a Master of Laws degree from Harvard University and a Bachelor of Laws
degree from Osgoode Hall Law School, as well as a Master of Arts degree from
Carleton University and a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Ottawa.

    Sheldon Plener joined Cassels Brock & Blackwell in 1978 and became a partner
in 1983 in the Business Law Practice Group. He is currently a member of the
firm's Executive Committee and Chair of its Audit Committee, and has been lead
counsel to public and private clients in a broad range of industries. He is also
a director of Biovail Corporation, the largest publicly traded pharmaceutical
company in Canada, and serves as Chair of its Risk and Compliance Committee. As
well, Mr. Plener is an Alternate National Hockey League Governor representing
the Ottawa Senators Hockey Team and is counsel to Ronald McDonald House Toronto
and the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation.

    "These gentlemen will be outstanding additions to our Board with their wide
breadth of legal and corporate experience," said William T. Monahan, Chairman of
the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer. "They also provide strong
Canadian representation for our Canada-based company."

    Novelis is the global leader in aluminum rolled products and aluminum can
recycling. The Company operates in 11 countries and has approximately 12,500
employees. Novelis has the unrivaled capability to provide its customers with a
regional supply of technologically sophisticated rolled aluminum products
throughout Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. Through its advanced
production capabilities, the Company supplies aluminum sheet and foil to the
automotive and transportation, beverage and food packaging, construction and
industrial, and printing markets. For more information, visit www.novelis.com.

SOURCE  Novelis Inc.
    -0-                             12/26/2006
    /CONTACT:  Charles Belbin, +1-404-814-4260, or charles.belbin@novelis.com,
or Eric Harris, +1-404-814-4304, or eric.harris@novelis.com, both of Novelis
Inc./
    /Web site:  http://www.novelis.com /
    (NVL)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 18, 2014

NO. 03-12-00497-CV

Edwin K. Lang, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Public Safety and

Steven C. McCraw, Director of Texas Dept. of Public Safety, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND ROSE

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on July 9, 2012. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the district court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 30118 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Leon Williams,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:18

- CR

- 143

- 1

Before **Davis, Stewart,** and **Dennis,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

Leon Williams appeals his 40

- month sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He challenges the district court’s application of the U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(3) base offense level, asserting that he did not
know the firearm he possessed was capable of accepting a large capacity

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 27, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-30118 Document: 00515618002 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/27/2020No. 20

- 30118

2 magazine. We review challenges to the district court’s interpretation or application of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo. United States v. Cisneros

Gutierrez , 517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir. 2008).

In U nited States v. Fry , 51 F.3d 543 , 546 (5th Cir. 1995), we held that, because § 2K2.1(a)(3) made “no reference to the defendant’s mental state[,] [t]he section [wa]s plain on its face and should not, in light of the apparent intent of the drafters, be read to imply a scienter requirement.” Although § 2K2.1(a)(3) has been amended since Fry , nothing in the text or commentary of § 2K2.1(a)(3) imposes a mens rea requirement. See § 2K2.1(a)(3) and comment. (n.2)

.
**AFFIRMED.** Case: 20-30118 Document: 00515618002 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/27/2020
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 12

                       WILLIAMS HOLDINGS OF DELAWARE, INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                              (Dollars in millions)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Years Ended December 31,
                                        ----------------------------------------------------------
                                          1997         1996        1995        1994        1993
                                        ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
<S>                                     <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings:
   Income from continuing
      operations before income taxes    $   278.7    $   316.6   $   268.7   $   179.1   $   244.9
   Add:
      Interest expense-net                   61.2         31.8        31.1        21.1         9.4
      Rental expense representative
         of interest factor                  14.9          6.8        13.1         4.9         3.4
      Preferred dividends of
         subsidiaries                        --           --           5.4        --          --
      Minority interest income of
         consolidated subsidiaries           14.0         --          --          --          --
      Other                                  (2.8)         1.2          .6          .8        (1.0)
                                        ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------

Total earnings as adjusted plus
   fixed charges                        $   366.0    $   356.4   $   318.9   $   205.9   $   256.7
                                        =========    =========   =========   =========   =========

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense-net                 $    61.2    $    31.8   $    31.1   $    21.1   $     9.4
   Capitalized interest                      11.9          3.5         9.8         4.7         5.4
   Rental expense representative
      of interest factor                     14.9          6.8        13.1         4.9         3.4
   Pretax effect of dividends on
      preferred stock of subsidiaries        --           --           7.7        --          --
                                        ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------

         Total fixed charges            $    88.0    $    42.1   $    61.7   $    30.7   $    18.2
                                        =========    =========   =========   =========   =========

Ratio of earnings to fixed
   charges                                   4.16         8.47        5.17        6.71       14.10
                                        =========    =========   =========   =========   =========
</TABLE>
| **EXHIBIT 23**                                          |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                    |
| **Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants** |

 

To the Board of Directors

 

Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.

As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report dated October 17, 2007, relating to the financial statements of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd., which report appears in the Annual Report dated July 31, 2007 on Form 10-K of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.

 

October 23, 2007

 

| /s/ Quick & McFarlin, P.C. |
|--------------------------------|
| Quick & McFarlin, P.C.     |
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary CHRISSINGER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 86CA0992.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Oct. 22, 1987.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 25, 1987.

*443Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., David R. Little, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

David F. Vela, State Public Defender, Judy Fried, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

BABCOCK, Judge.

Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of second degree forgery in connection with the execution of two checks on the bank account of another. We affirm his conviction, and remand for resentencing.

I.

Defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions. We disagree.

The checks in this case were written to pay for parts and installation of a car radiator and motor. At trial, defendant testified that he had never been at the auto parts store where the two false checks were passed. However, two eyewitnesses identified defendant as the person who wrote the checks, signing a name which later proved to be that of another person. The person whose name defendant signed testified that he had not written the checks, and that he had, in fact, closed the account on which the checks were drawn when the account checkbook was lost nearly a month before the checks were passed.

This testimony, along with other circumstantial evidence surrounding the transaction, was sufficient to sustain a conclusion by á reasonable person that, beyond a reasonable doubt, defendant had passed the checks in question, and that he had done so with knowledge that they were false and with the intent to defraud. *See*§ 18-5-103(1)(a), C.R.S. (1986 Repl. Vol. 8B); *People v. Bennett,*183 Colo. 125, 515 P.2d 466 (1973).

II.

Defendant also asserts that his sentence is illegal because imposition of a mandatory term of parole in addition to his community corrections sentence violated § 18-1-105(1)(a)(II), C.R.S. (1986 Repl. Vol. 8B). The People confess error, and we agree.

Section 18-1-105(1)(a)(II), C.R.S. (1986 Repl. Vol. 8B) does not authorize imposition of parole as part of a sentence for offenses committed on or after July 1, 1984, and before July 1, 1985. *Qureshi v. District Court,*727 P.2d 45 (Colo.1986). The offenses here were committed on June 13, 1985. Thus, the trial court erred in sentencing defendant to a mandatory parole term.

However, the trial court has discretion to subject defendant to up to one year of supervision by the district probation office after his release from the community correctional facility. *See*§ 17-27-105(5), C.R. S. (1986 Repl. Vol. 8A). Accordingly, on resentencing, the trial court may impose a period of supervision pursuant to § 17-27-105(5), C.R.S. (1986 Repl. Vol. 8A). *See*Crim.P. 35(a).

The judgment is affirmed, and the cause is remanded for resentencing in accordance with the views expressed herein.

ENOCH, C.J., and STERNBERG, J., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2495

LUCYNA B. PHAIR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA96-1060-DKC)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 28, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lucyna B. Phair, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Wellington Thompson,

Jr., County Attorney, Linda B. Thall, Senior Assistant County Attorney, Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Rockville,

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary

judgment in Appellant's suit alleging violations of Title VII of

the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3 (1994), and the

Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-

634 (West 1985 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Phair v.

Montgomery County Pub. Sch., No. CA-96-1060-DKC (D. Md. Sept. 29,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**DORIS VALINCIUS AND JOHN**
**VALINCIUS,**

**Petitioners**

**v.**

**BRUCE WEINER, M.D, ASSOCIATED SURGEONS, P.C., MONTGOMERY**  **HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, LINDA L. KURTZ, D.O. AND JOHN E.** 
**DEVENNY, M.D. ,**

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 649 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 1st day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowa nce of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justices Eakin and Wecht did not participate in the decision of this matter.**
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.15 MB)

Tags:Hotel Battery, DLA Aviation, Defense Supply Center Richmond, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, 14th Marines, Toys for Tots, 3D Battalion

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-23-00247-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1761172

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

DENELL HOWELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In accordance with a plea agreement, Appellant Denell Howell pled guilty to 

driving while intoxicated and received a sentence of 100 days in the Tarrant County 

Jail, probated for eighteen months. Howell filed a notice of appeal, but the trial court’s 

certification of Howell’s right to appeal stated that this was a plea-bargain case and 

that Howell had no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Given that

certification, we notified Howell that we would dismiss the appeal unless by October 

2, 2023, he or another party filed with this court a response showing grounds for the 

appeal’s continuation.

We have not received a response. Accordingly, we dismiss Howell’s appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 25(a)(2), (d), 43.2(f); Roberts v. State, 508 S.W.3d 481, 482 (Tex. App.—

Fort Worth 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.); see also Gray v. State, No. 02-17-00271-CR, 

2017 WL 4296449, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Sept. 28, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op., 

not designated for publication).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: November 2, 2023
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-17027,
333-26047 and 333-34492) of PW Eagle, Inc. (formerly Eagle Pacific Industries, Inc.) of our report dated February 2, 2001, except for Note 15, as to which
the date is March 20, 2001, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule information for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, which appears in this
Form 10-K.

|/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP       
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP           
|Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 30, 2001

50

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, James P. Cox, certifythat:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof PQ Corporation;

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
| Date: June 23,  2006 |                                             |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                      | /s/ James P. Cox                            |
|                      | James P. Cox                                |
|                      | Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 11534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4715]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

DATE & TIME: Thursday, March 1, 2012 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 
Correction and Approval of the Minutes for the Meeting of February 16, 
2012;
Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-04: Justice Party of Mississippi;
Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-03: ActRight;
Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-01: Stop This Insanity, Inc. Employee 
Leadership Fund;
Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Chris Dodd for President, 
Inc.;
Management and Administrative Matters.
    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at 
least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-4715 Filed 2-23-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P