alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Diericx, Rick" <Aric.Diericx@dynegy.com>

Date: 7/21/2010 3:15 PM

Subject: Re: DMG Request for Extension of Time

Attachments: pic13152.gif

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire for the following Dynegy Midwest Generation

(DMG) facilities:

 Baldwin Energy Complex

 Havana Power Plant

 Hennepin Power Plant

 Vermilion Power Plant

 Wood River Power Plant

The deadline for your plant to submit Version 1 and Version 2 of the

completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. Please note

that the deadline for Part G, if applicable, is unchanged and remains

120 days after receipt of the questionnaire.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric

questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at

steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic13152.gif)

 

 From: "Diericx, Rick" <Aric.Diericx@dynegy.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "Davis, Thomas L" <Thomas.L.Davis@dynegy.com>, "Trammell, Ben" 

<Ben.Trammell@dynegy.com>, Robert 

 Dellinger/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Betsy Devlin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

 Date: 07/07/2010 09:50 AM 

 Subject: DMG Request for Extension of Time 

Attached is a copy of Dynegy Midwest Generation’s request for an

extension of time to prepare and submit its responses to USEPA’s Steam

Electric Power Generating Industry Effluent Limitations Guidelines

Information Collection Request.
Please let me know if you have any questions.

Rick Diericx

Senior Director – Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc.

618.206.5912[attachment "DMG Request for Extension of Time 7-6-2010.pdf"

deleted by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 11, 2014

No. 04-13-00791-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF AMINTA PEREZ-MUZZA, DECEASED,

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007PB7000089-L2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure will hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation.

# DATE:

September 11-12, 2012.

**TIME:**                     8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                

# ADDRESSES:

Hotel Monaco Portland, 506 SW Washington Street, Portland, OR 97204.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Benjamin J. Robinson, Deputy Rules Officer and Counsel, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: February 21, 2012.

Benjamin J. Robinson,

Deputy Rules Officer and Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2012-4637 Filed 2-27-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Scott Long, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 14, 2007



/s/ SCOTT LONGScott LongChief Financial Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00211

- CR

Christopher M. Wong, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 167TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- DC

- 15

- 302712 , THE HONORABLE P. D AVID WAHLBERG, JUDGE PRESI DING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due August 12, 2019 . On counsel’s
motion s , the time for filing was extended to November 12, 2019. Appellant’s counsel has now
filed a third motion, requesting that the Court extend the time for filing appellant’s brief. We
grant the motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than
November 27, 2019. No further extension of time wi ll be granted and failure to comply with this
order will result in the r eferral of this case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
It is ordered on N o vember 19, 2019

.

Before Justices Goodwin, B aker, and K elly
Do Not Pub lish
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Michael E.  DeDomenico,  Chief  Executive  Officer of NuCO2
Inc., a Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify,  to his
knowledge, that:

The Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended June 30,  2007 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                /s/ Michael E. DeDomenico
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Michael E. DeDomenico
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                September 13, 2007
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.81 MB)

Tags:Defense Supply Center Richmond, Black history month, Virginia, Army Reserve Chief Warrant Officer Phillip Brashear, Fort Lee Kenner Army Health Clinic, 80th Training Command 

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
ex10_z1.htm








Exhibit 10(z)(1)







Description of Ardour Capital Warrants







The Ardour Capital Warrants shall be in the form of Exhibit 10(y) to this Report except that the exercise price will be $16.45 per share and the term will be until November 1, 2011.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NewPage Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew L. Jesch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/s/ Matthew L. Jesch                                   
|Matthew L. Jesch Chief Financial Officer August 8, 2006
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NARJIT SINGH, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 11-72177 Agency No. A070-541-436
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted December 11, 2014 ** San Francisco, California Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FISHER and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Narjit Singh petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his claims for asylum, withholding of removal and relie f under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We deny the petition. 

# FILED
DEC 15 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).The BIA’s adverse credibility determination is supported by substantial evidence. See Cui v. Holder , 712 F.3d 1332, 1336 (9th Cir. 2013); Zamanov v. Holder , 649 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2011). Singh testified inconsistently regarding when he first encountered problems with the police because of his support for Shiromani Akali Dal Mann, first testif ying the problems began in 1990 but later testifying that they began in 1987. Singh al so testified inconsistently regarding the reasons for his 1991 arrest. In his asylum application, he asserted that he was arrested for participating in a militant a ttack in which police officers were killed. At his hearing before the IJ, he testifie d that he was arrested for hosting militants and supplying them with food. He also provided inconsistent testimony regarding his 1990 detention. In his asylum applica tion, he asserted that both he and his father had been hung upside down, but he omitted that detail at his hearing before the IJ, even when pressed. These incons istencies go to the heart of Singh’s asylum claim and therefore support the adverse credibility determination. See Singh v. Gonzales , 439 F.3d 1100, 1108-09 (9th Cir. 2006). Singh argues that the BIA erred by citi ng his failure to offer corroborating evidence as additional support for its advers e credibility determination. We agree. Under Sidhu v. INS , 220 F.3d 1085, 1091 (9th Cir. 2000), “[t]he petitioner must be given an opportunity at his IJ hearing to explain his failure to produce material
2corroborating evidence.” That did not o ccur here. This error, however, is not alone sufficient to set aside the adverse credibility finding. See Wang v. INS , 352 F.3d 1250, 1259 (9th Cir. 2003) (“So long as one of the identified grounds is supported by substantial evidence and goes to the heart of [Singh’s] claim of persecution, we are bound to accept the IJ’s adverse credibility finding.”). PETITION DENIED.

3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0517

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SHANE CLARK JOHNSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 14, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 8 2023

05/08/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0517
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00394-CV 

SANDRA JOYCE HEMPHILL APPELLANT

V.

LARRY MOFFETT APPELLEE 

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

This is an attempted appeal from the trial court’s final judgment of October 

1, 2013, in favor of Appellee Larry Moffett. On November 6, 2013, Appellant 

Sandra Joyce Hemphill filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1. On November 8, 2013, we notified Hemphill that her 

notice of appeal appeared untimely and advised that we would dismiss her 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

appeal for want of jurisdiction if she did not file a verified response by November 

18, 2013, showing a reasonable explanation for the late notice of appeal. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 10.2, 10.5(b), 26.1, 26.3(b), 42.3(a), 44.3. Hemphill did not 

respond; however, Moffett filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Hemphill failed to file her notice of appeal within the thirty-day deadline 

imposed by the appellate rules and failed to give a reasonable explanation for its 

lateness, which divests this court of jurisdiction to hear her appeal. See Verburgt 

v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Therefore, we grant Moffett’s 

motion to dismiss and dismiss Hemphill’s appeal for want of jurisdiction. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

LEE GABRIEL

JUSTICE

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 9, 2014
Exhibit 10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 

Execution Copy 

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO SEARCH SERVICES AGREEMENT 

This Fourth Amendment to Search Services Agreement (“Fourth Amendment”) is entered into by and between AOL Inc.
(successor-in-interest to AOL LLC), a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business at 770 Broadway, New York, NY 10003 (“AOL”), and CNN Interactive Group, Inc. (“CNN”), a Delaware corporation with
offices at One CNN Center, Atlanta, GA 30303, effective as of February 28, 2010 (the “Fourth Amendment Effective Date”). 

INTRODUCTION 

The Parties hereto wish to amend the Search Services Agreement entered into by and between AOL and CNN on or about September 1,
2007, as amended by the First Amendment dated as of April 30, 2008, the Second Amendment dated as of December 10, 2009, and the Third Amendment dated as of January 31, 2010 (collectively, the “Existing Agreement”).
Together, the Existing Agreement and this Fourth Amendment shall be referred to collectively as the “Agreement”. Capitalized terms not defined in this Fourth Amendment shall have the meanings set forth in the Existing Agreement.

 AGREEMENT 

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby amend the Existing
Agreement as follows: 
  

	1.	Term. Section 6.1 (titled, “Term”) of the Existing Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 “This Agreement will commence on the Effective Date and shall expire at 11:59 p.m. (EST) on March 31,
2010, unless terminated earlier as provided for in this Agreement (the “Term”). 
  

	2.	Order of Precedence; Entire Agreement. Except as expressly modified by this Fourth Amendment, all terms and conditions, and provisions of the Existing
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. In the event of conflict between the terms and conditions of the Existing Agreement and the terms and conditions of this Fourth Amendment, the terms and conditions of this Fourth Amendment will
control. The Existing Agreement, together with any exhibits, and schedules attached thereto and referenced therein, all as modified by this Fourth Amendment, constitutes the entire and exclusive agreement between the Parties with respect to the
subject matter thereof. 

  

	3.	Counterparts; Facsimile. This Fourth Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall
constitute one and the same document. This Fourth Amendment may be executed by signatures transmitted by facsimile or email. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Fourth Amendment to Search Services Agreement to be signed by their duly authorized
representatives and delivered as of the dates set forth below. 
  

									
	 AOL INC.
	 		 	CNN INTERACTIVE GROUP, INC.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Steven Quan
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Susan Grant

	Name:	 	Steven Quan	 		 	Name:	 	Susan Grant
	Title:	 	VP, Business Development	 		 	Title:	 	EVP, CNN News Services
	Date:	 	2/25/10	 		 	Date:	 	2/26/10

  


			
	 Confidential
	  	1
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Roger Arnet, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of WestCoast Golf
     Experiences, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
4th day of September, 2007.


/s/ Roger Arnet
-----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 21.1****SUBSIDIARIES OF****INTERNATIONAL WIRE GROUP, INC.**     **JURISDICTION OF**  **INCORPORATION OR****SUBSIDIARY** **ORGANIZATION**Omega Wire, Inc. Delaware   Wire Technologies, Inc. Indiana   IWG High Performance Conductors, Inc. New York   IWG International, Inc. Barbados   IWG Resources LLC Nevada   Italtrecce-Societa Italiana Trecce & Affini, S.r.l Italy   International Wire, S.A.S. France   International Wire Group, S.A.S. France   Tresse Metallique J. Forissier, S.A. France   Cablerie E. Charbonnet, S.A. France