alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 24.1****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Lionel Reilly or NealSoderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31,2005, and any such amendment thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(“SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to file any such amendment to theForm 10-K, exhibits thereto and documents required in connection therewith with the SEC, andgenerally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully andeffectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.     INWITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 19th day of October, 2005.             /s/ Buddy D. Ray DVM               Buddy D. Ray       STATEOF KENTUCKY  )      )  ss.COUNTYOF GRAVES  )        Onthis 19th day of October, 2005, before me, a Notary Public qualified for said County,personally came Buddy D. Ray, known to me to be the identical person who signed the foregoinginstrument and acknowledged the execution thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.     /s/ Kay F. Richardson             Notary Public  My commission expires:         5-29-06
1

The Honorable F.A. Gossett, III, United States Magistrate Judge for the

District of Nebraska, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent

of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2570

___________

Kathaleen Burnett, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Nagl Manufacturing, Company, *

Norm Fredrickson; June Jones; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Richard Keeten, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: August 28, 2007

Filed: September 4, 2007

___________

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Kathaleen Burnett appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in her employment-discrimination action against her former employer, Nagl

Manufacturing Company and others. Having carefully reviewed the record and

considered Burnett’s arguments, we conclude that the district court properly granted
-2-

summary judgment and that there is no basis for reversal. See Jacob-Mua v.

Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (de novo standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Burnett’s pending motions.

______________________________
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2013

d1118 

# Order

Clerk November 25, 2013

146882(72)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146882

COA: 304163

Wayne CC: 10

- 010029

- FC

CRAIG MELVIN JACKSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 25, 2013

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 134489 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 134489 COA: 270556 Lenawee CC: 05-011493-FH TRACY R. HUFF, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 14, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1022 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 29, 2007

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               449,567
<SECURITIES>                                         2,840,127
<RECEIVABLES>                                        000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         000
<INVENTORY>                                          000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     000
<PP&E>                                               000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       33,871,495<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                000
<BONDS>                                              000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                000
<PREFERRED>                                          000
<COMMON>                                             000
<OTHER-SE>                                           33,573,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         33,871,495<F2>
<SALES>                                              000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     204,683<F3>
<CGS>                                                000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     498,031<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      000
<CHANGES>                                            000
<NET-INCOME>                                         (4,337,761)<F5>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (62.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        000
<FN>
<F1>Total  Assets  includes   Investments  in  Local  Limited   Partnerships  of
$30,531,768 and other assets of $50,033.
<F2>Included  in Total  Liabilities and Equity is Deferred  revenue of $174,357.
Accounts  payable to affiliates of $88,227 and accounts  payable and
accrued expenses of $35,692.
<F3>Total Revenue includes Investment of $191,349 and Other revenue of $13,334.
<F4>Included in Other Expenses are General and Administrative of $237,545, Asset
management fees of $231,035 and  Amortization of $29,451.  
<F5>Net Loss includes
Equity in losses of Local Limited Partnerships of $4,044,413.
</FN>

        

</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00061-CV

Southern County Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant

v. Charles Choukalos, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT , NO. GN 022247, HONORABLE W. JEANNE MEURER. , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed an agreed motion to dispo se of this case pursuant to a settlement agreement. The parties request that this Court reverse and remand the trial court’s judgment to allow for entry of a final judgment consistent with their settlement agreement.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded for the entry of final judgment consistent with the parties’ settlement agreement. Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(d).

Mack Kidd, Justice Before: Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear Reversed and Remanded on Agreed Motion Filed: July 24, 2003
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.46 MB)

Tags:Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, Defense Logistics Agency, Awards, Rim of the Pacific exercise, Subsistence, Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Pacific, Food Inspection, RIMPACT

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
| **Exhibit 24.6**      |
|-----------------------|
|                  |
| **POWER OF ATTORNEY** |

 

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Lionel Reilly or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf  (i) to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007, and any such amendment thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (ii) to file the Annual Report on Form 10-K, any amendment thereto, and all exhibits and documents required in connection therewith the SEC, and (iii) generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 18th day of October, 2007.

 

| /s/ William Swartz, D.V.M. |
|----------------------------|
| William Swartz             |

 

| STATE OF FLORIDA  | ) |   |
|-------------------|---|--------|
|              | ) | ss.    |
| COUNTY OF COLLIER | ) |   |

 

On this 18th day of October, 2007, before me, a Notary public qualified for said County, personally came William Swartz, known to me to be the identical person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the execution thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.

 

| /s/ Roxanne L. Fechter |
|------------------------|
| Notary Public          |
| My commission expires: |

 

| May 17, 2009 |
|--------------|
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.13

                               M E M O R A N D U M




TO:     EAGLE RIVER INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

FROM:   AZCO Mining Inc.

DATE:   June 7, 1996

RE:     STRATEGIC ALLIANCE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The purpose of this Memorandum is to briefly set forth our agreement to form a
strategic alliance on the following term:

1.      The parties will form a joint venture company, or other appropriate
        entity as advised by counsel, to mutually develop properties identified
        by Eagle River.

2.      The parties's interest in the joint venture entity shall be as to 75%
        for AZCO and 25% for Eagle River.

3.      Eagle River's responsibility is to seek out, pursue and acquire such
        properties of merit as the parties may mutually determine, for which
        Eagle River shall be funded by the joint venture entity.

4.      AZCO's responsibility is to provide, or raise the necessary funds for
        the joint venture enterprise.

5.      Any ventures which Eagle River wishes to pursue shall first be brought
        to the strategic alliance joint venture for AZCO's consideration and, if
        AZCO determines, in consultation with Eagle River, that the particular
        planned endeavour is not considered appropriate for the joint venture,
        then Eagle River may pursue such planned venture on its own without
        further reference to the strategic alliance.

6.      The parties acknowledge that it is intended that the properties to be
        acquired and developed by the strategic alliance will be vended into
        public vehicles mutually agreed for development and fund raising or, if
        AZCO shall determine that the interest shall be directly acquired by
        AZCO, AZCO shall negotiate fair and reasonable compensation for Eagle
        River's 25% interest and such compensation shall be based upon an
        independent professionally qualified, mutually agreed, evaluator. If the
        parties cannot agree then the interest shall be vended to a public
        corporation under the terms of this Memorandum.








<PAGE>   2

7.      The joint venture shall negotiate anti-dilution provisions for each
        party for any equity consideration received in the public vehicles.


If the foregoing accurately represents our agreement, please execute a copy of
this Memorandum as our agreement in principle. We will thereupon instruct our
solicitors to proceed with a detailed agreement. It is intended that this
Memorandum shall have binding legal effects.


Yours truly,


AGREED THIS ______ day of June, 1996

AZCO MINING INC.


Per:
    -----------------------------------
           Authorized Signatory

AGREED THIS ______ day of June, 1996

EAGLE RIVER INTERNATIONAL LIMITED


Per:
    -----------------------------------
           Authorized Signatory
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Earth Energy Reserves, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Steven Kranker, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Steven Kranker
-----------------------------
Steven Kranker
Chief Executive Officer

September 23, 2010


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Earth Energy Reserves,
Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, W.A. Sikora, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/W.A. Sikora
-----------------------------
W.A. Sikora
Chief Financial Officer

September 23, 2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 14, 2015

Order 

July 14, 2015

151421(53)

TOD MCLAIN, Personal Representative of the

ESTATE OF TRACY MCLAIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

LANSING FIRE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF

LANSING, and JEFFREY WILLIAMS,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

MICHAEL DEMPS,

Defendant.

SC: 151421

COA: 318927

Ingham CC: 11-000859-NH

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to extend the time 

for filing a reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if submitted 

on or before July 17, 2015.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _
No. 1 8- 11 81

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _

Jo el Gom ez An dr ad e

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Peti ti on er

v.

Mat th ew G. W hi ta ke r, Acti ng Att or ne y Gene ral of t he Uni te d S ta te s

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Resp on de nt

__ __ __ __ __ __

Pet it io n fo r Rev ie w of a n Ord er o f th e Bo ard of I m

m ig rat io n Ap pe al s

__ __ __ __ __ __
Su bm it te d: Nov em

be r 1, 2 01 8 Fi le d: Nov em

be r 21 , 20 18 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __
Befo re WOL LMAN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __

PER CURI AM.

M e x i c a n c i t iz en Jo el Gom ez And rad e pe ti ti on s fo r rev ie w of an or de r of th e Bo ard of Im

m ig rat io n Ap p e a l s d i s m is si ng hi s ap pe al fro m th e de ci si on of an im m ig rat io n ju dg e, whi ch de ni ed hi m wit hh ol di ng of r em ov al

. 1

1 The de ni al of as y lu m an d rel ie f un de r th e Co nv en ti on Aga in st Tort ur e are no t be fo re th e pa ne l. See Ch ay -Vel as qu ez v. Hol de r , 36 7 F.3 d 75 1, 75 6 (8 th Ci r. 20 04 )Upo n rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at su bs ta nt ia l ev id en ce su pp or ts th e de ni al of

wit hh ol di ng of rem ov al be cau se Gom ez And rad e di d no t sh ow a cl ear pr ob ab il it y th at
hi s li fe or free do m wou ld be th reat en ed on acco un t o f m em be rs hi p in a pa rti cu la r

so ci al gr ou p, po li ti cal op in io n, or any ot he r pr ot ect ed gr ou nd sh ou ld he be ret ur ne d

to Mex ic o. Se e 8 U.S.C. § 12 31 (b )(3 )(A) (li st in g pr ot ect ed gr ou nd s) ; Mal o n ga v. Hol de r , 6 2 1 F.3 d 75 7, 76 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ) (p la ci ng th e bu rd en of pr oo f in th e wit hh ol di ng co nt ex t on th e ap pl ic an t). Fu rth er, th e reco rd do es no t de m on st rat e th at
th e Mex ic an go ve rn m en t was un ab le or un wil li ng to co nt ro l th e ha rm Gom ez And rad e al le ge s. Se e Men ji va r v. Gon za le s , 41 6 F.3 d 91 8, 9 2 1 ( 8 t h C i r. 20 05 ) (req ui rin g th at th e go ve rn m en t was “ u n a b l e o r un wil li ng to co nt ro l” th e ha rm in fli ct ed ). Fi na ll y , in li gh t o f t h e f a ct th at Gom ez And rad e’s fam il y co nt in ue s to

res id e in Mex ic o un ha rm ed , he d id no t pr ov id e su ffi ci en t ev id en ce to pr ov e th at he

co ul d no t sa fel y rel oc at e wit hi n Mex ic o. S e e Kr as no

pi vt se v v. Ash cr of

t , 38 2 F.3 d
83 2, 83 9 (8 th Ci r. 20 04 ) (“ The reas on ab le ne ss of a fear of pe rs ecu ti on is di m in is he d
whe n fam il y m em

be rs rem ai n in th e na ti ve co un try un ha rm e d

, a n d th e ap pl ic an t
hi m se lf ha d no t be en si ng le d ou t fo r ab us e.”). The jud gm en t is affi rm ed

. Se e 8t h Ci r. R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

(cl ai m is waiv ed on ap pe al wher e it is no t m ean in gf ul ly argu ed in op en in g b rie f).

-2

-
Exhibit 32.1

NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the
Report), I, James S. Quarforth, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



By: /s/ James S. QuarforthJames S. QuarforthChief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors


May 10, 2007
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED S IR CHARLES A. CRAWLEY , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 887 LT Case No. 2006

- CF

- 4663

- A

- O STATE O F FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed July 5, 2022 3.850 A ppeal f rom the C ircuit C ourt for Orange C ounty , Mark S

. B lechman , Judge. Sir Charles A. C rawley, Graceville, pr o s e. Ashley M oody, A ttorney G eneral, Tallahassee, an d N ora Hutchinson H all, Assistant A ttorney G eneral, D aytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

COHEN , EISNAUGLE and SASSO, JJ. , concur.