alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
**EXHIBIT 32

                                              CERTIFICATIONS**

I, M. Ray (Hoppy) Cole, Jr. Chief Executive Officer, certify that

         this periodic report containing financial statements fully complies with the
         requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
         U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the periodic report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the issuer.

         Date: March 25, 2010

                                                     /s/ M. Ray (Hoppy) Cole, Jr.
                                                   ---------------------------------------
                                                     M. Ray (Hoppy) Cole, Jr.
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

I, Dee Dee Lowery, Chief Financial Officer, certify that

         this periodic report containing financial statements fully complies with the
         requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
         U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the periodic report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the issuer.

         Date: March 25, 2010

                                                     /s/ Dee Dee Lowery
                                                   ---------------------------------------
                                                     Dee Dee Lowery
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
```
02/18/2010 11:56 FAX 2024835142 FAA 

. _. "^"fl * DMS aOOI/003 

L:.n u'l 

f:^ 

''''''' -^CEIVEO 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION£ARU>tO OOGr^f c -

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFHCE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of Helicopters Flite, Inc. 

FAA Docket No. CP09EA0015 

Judge Benkin 

AGENCY'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE RESPONDENT FROM 

CALLING WITNESSES AND OFFERING EXmBITS INTO EVIDENCE AT THE 

HEARING 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by counsel, hereby requests diat 

Respondent be precluded from calling any witnesses and offering any exhibits into 

evidence at the hearing based on the following: 

(1) Under the Administrative Law Judge's Order Postponing Hearing served on 

August 14, 2009, the parties were required to exchange witness lists and 

proposed exhibits by January 12,2010. 

(2) The Agency submitted its witness and exhibit hst, and subsequently 

submitted a supplement to (his infonnation on January 7,2010. 

(3) Respondent, however, has failed to submit any exhibit or witness list. 

(4) This failure on the part of Respondent is prejudicial to the Agency in that it 

hampere the Agency's ability to prepare for the hearing. 
02/18/2010 11:57 FAX 2024835142 FAA ^ DMS 002/003 

WHEREFORE, the Agency requests that this motion in hmine be granted in all 

respects and that Respondent be precluded from calling any wimesses or offering any 

exhibits into evidence at the hearing. 

Respectfiilly submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

' J . VTiJ UJ^f^f l l.,. ^ M l M ' 

By: 

Zachary Nf Bejinan 

Attorney 

Federal Aviation AdminisUration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

PH: (718)553-3258 

FAX: (718)995-5699 
02/18/2010 11:57 FAX 2024835142 FAA * DMS @1003/003 

CERTinCATE OF SERVICE 

T hereby certify that the foregoing AGENCY^S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE 

RESPONDENT FROM CALLING WITNTESSES AND OFFERING EXHIBITS 

INTO EVIDENCE AT THE HEARING has been sent via first class mail and facsimile on 

this date to the folJowing: 

Christopher T. Powell, Jr., Esq. 

Powell Law 

527 Linden Street 

Scranton, PA 18503 

Telefax: (570)342-1232 

The Honorable Isaac Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El 2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Telefax: (202)366-7536 

1 hereby certify that the foregoing Agency's Supplemental List of Exhibits and Witnesses has 

been sent via first class mail and facsimile on this date to the following: 

Federal Aviation Adminisuation (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington,DC. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-*30 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014 

Date: JAN 1 9 2010 

Carolyn O'kseete 

Legal Technician 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434
Exhibit 32.1

NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 (the Report), I, James A. Hyde, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|            |  |     |  |                                      
|----------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|            |  | By: |  | /s/ James A. Hyde                    
|            |  |     |  | James A. Hyde                        
|            |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|            |  |    
|May 4, 2010 |  |     |  |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1502

KEVIN POTTER; MARGUERITE C. POTTER; HARRY H. POTTER; THEODORE POTTER; DALE M. POTTER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus JAMES MOSTELLER, III; JAMES NANCE; STANLEY MCGUFFIN; HENDERSON AND SALLEY; BEDINGFIELD & WILLIAMS; NANCE & MCCANTS; AUGUSTA FIBERGLASSCOATINGS, INC.; CRESTWOOD GOLF CLUB, INCORPORATED; CRESTWOOD PARTNERSHIP; JOHN BOYD; DALE BRYANT; GEORGE SPRUCE MCCAIN; CLAUDE MCCAIN; MCCAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, INCORPORATED; RYANTIDWELL; CRESTWOOD GOLF CLUB TRUST, INCORPORATED; SOUTH CAROLINA NATIONAL BANK; WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, N.A.; SINKLER & BOYD, P.A.; EDWARD HAYES; WALTER BRYANT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-98-1158-5-22) Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Kevin Potter, Marguerite C. Potter, Harry H. Potter, Theodore Potter, Dale M. Potter, Appellants Pro Se. James Donovan Mosteller, III, BEDINGFIELD LAW OFFICES, Barnwell, South Carolina; James Drayton Nance, NANCE & MCCANTS, Aiken, South Carolina; Clarke Wardlaw DuBose, SINKLER & BOYD, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; Edward A. Frazier, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying their Fed. R. Civ.P. 60(b) motion and granting sanctions against them. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Potter v. Mosteller , No. CA-98-1158-5- 22 (D.S.C. Mar. 22 & 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1


                               POWERS OF ATTORNEY
                               ------------------


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned does hereby make and
appoint HOBART BIRMINGHAM and KATHLEEN FISHER and each of them, acting together
or alone, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with full power of
substitution, in his name, place and stead to execute on his behalf, in his
capacity as Director and/or an Officer of Borland International, Inc., an annual
report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 or other appropriate
forms and any and all amendments thereto (including post effective amendments)
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") pursuant to
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act") and any and all
instruments which said attorneys-in-fact and agents deem necessary or advisable
to enable Borland International, Inc. to comply with the 1933 Act and the rules
and regulations and requirements of the SEC in respect thereof, giving and
granting to said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them acting together
or alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing whatsoever necessary or appropriate to be done in and about the premises
as fully to all intents as he might or would do if personally present at the
doing thereof, with full power of substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that his said attorneys-in-fact or substitutes may or shall
lawfully do or cause or be done by virtue hereof.

     THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY expires on September 30, 1998.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand on the date
indicated below.

Dated: February 10, 1998

                                           /s/ Delbert W. Yocam
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Delbert W. Yocam

                                           /s/ Harry Saal
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Harry Saal

                                           /s/ George Hara
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           George Hara

                                           /s/ David Heller
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           David Heller

                                           /s/ Stephen Lewis
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Stephen Lewis

                                           /s/ William Miller
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           William Miller
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6674

DEVINCHE JAVON ALBRITTON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 2:16

- cv - 00737

- AWA

- LRL )

Submitted : October 17, 2019 Decided: October 21, 2019

Before MOTZ and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. DeVinche Albritton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: DeVinche Javon Albritton, a Virginia inmate, seeks to appeal the district court’s order * denying various postjudgment motions filed in Albritton’ s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) proceeding . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate
of a ppealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits , a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U .S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional r ight. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Albritton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the app eal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

* Because Albritton filed numerous postjudgment motions in his federal habeas proceeding, which the district court resolved in various orders, we note that the subject order was entered on April 24, 2019.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Interstate Land Investors II Limited
Partnership (the Registrant), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey K. Harpel, General Partner and Principal
Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant. By:
    /s/ Jeffrey K. HarpelJeffrey K. HarpelSenior Vice PresidentISC Realty Corporation,General Partner and PrincipalExecutive Officer of the RegistrantApril 9, 2004
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AppleREIT Seven, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endingSeptember 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Reportfairly represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions andresults of operations of the Company as of September 30, 2009, and for theperiod then ended.

 
| /s/    GLADE M. KNIGHT |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| **Glade M. Knight**                        |   |
| **Chief Executive Officer**                |   |
|                                       |   |
| November 4, 2009                      |   |
|                                       |   |
| /s/    BRYAN PEERY     |   |
| **Bryan Peery**                            |   |
| **Chief Financial Officer**                |   |
|                                       |   |
| November 4, 2009                      |   |

 

1

----
NOS. 06-15-00065-CR; 06-15-00066-CR; 06-15-00071-CR

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE

§

VS. § 6th COURT

§

CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY 

DAVIDSON

§ OF APPEALS

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: 

Now comes Katherine A. Ferguson, Movant, court appointed counsel for 

Appellant CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY DAVIDSON in the above styled and 

numbered causes, and moves this Court to grant her Motion to Withdraw as Counsel 

pursuant to Rule 6.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and for good cause 

shows the following: 

1. Movant is appointed counsel of record CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY 

DAVIDSON. 

2. Counsel was unable to find any non-frivolous issues to bring on appeal. 

3. Counsel has mailed a copy of the Reporter’s Record, Clerks Record, 

this Motion and Brief in support of motion to withdraw to Appellant by certified 

mail. 

4. Counsel has informed Appellant of his right to file a pro se brief and, 

ACCEPTED

06-15-00065-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

7/2/2015 4:50:32 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 7/7/2015 4:29:00 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
or request for extension of time to file a pro se brief.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Movant prays that this Court 

grant this Motion To Withdraw, and for such other and further relief as the Court 

may deem appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

RENSHAW, DAVIS & FERGUSON, L.L.P.

By: /s/ Katherine A. Ferguson

Katherine A. Ferguson (SBN 06918050)

2900 Lee Street, Suite 102

P.O. Box 21

Greenville, Texas 75403-0021

Telephone: (903) 454-6050 

Facsimile: (903) 454-4898 

Email: rdflawoffice@yahoo.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the Motion to Withdraw was sent 

by first class United States Mail, postage prepaid, to the Honorable Noble Walker, 

Hunt County District Attorney, P.O. Box 441, Greenville, Texas 75403-0441 on this 

the 2

nd day of July, 2015.

I further certify that a true and correct copy of Motion to Withdraw was 

sent by first class United States mail, postage prepaid to CHRISTOPHER 

ANTHONY DAVIDSON, TDJC#01988392, Fabian Dale Dominguez State Jail,

6535Cagnon Road, San Antonio, Texas 78252-2202 on this the 2

nd day of July, 2015

/s/ Katherine A. Ferguson

Katherine A. Ferguson
# EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of CurrencySharesSM Euro Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Financial Officer of Rydex
Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.              The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information
          contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial           condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: February 28, 2007

/s/ NICK BONOS  Nick Bonos*Chief
 Financial Officer(principal financial officer)

*The Registrant is a trust
and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex
Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
<PAGE> 1

Exhibit 23.1 - Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of Allegiant Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 21,
1999, included in the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of Allegiant
Bancorp, Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-13451) pertaining to the Allegiant Bancorp,
Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, the Allegiant Bancorp, Inc. Directors Stock
Option Plan, the Allegiant Bancorp, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan and the
Allegiant Bancorp, Inc. 1989 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-26433) pertaining to the Reliance Financial,
Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3
No. 333-65699) of Allegiant Bancorp, Inc. and in the related Prospectus
pertaining to the Allegiant Bancorp, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock
Purchase Plan of our report dated January 21, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference of
Allegiant Bancorp, Inc.



                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 29, 1999
October 11, 2011

Mr. Stephen M. Schiller Colonel, US Army (Retired)

Senior Vice President Training & Security Group International, Inc.

P.O. Box 2603 Weatherford, TX 76086

Dear Mr. Schiller:

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for exemption. It acknowledges receipt of the petition and describes how we will process it.

We Have the Petition

We’ve received your September 9, 2011, petition on behalf of Training & Security Group International, Inc., (TSGI) for an exemption from § 91.205(h) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption, if granted, would allow TSGI to continue to use night vision goggles (NVGs) in its aircraft.

How We’ll Process the Petition

A petition for an exem ption, according to 14 CFR 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. In addition, we publish a summary of the petition in the Federal Register for public comment unless, according to 14 CFR 11.87, we determine that good cause exists for not publishing it.

Because granting your petition wouldn’t set a precedent, we’ve determined that we shouldn’t delay action on it by publishing it for public comment. Therefore, we’ve waived the requirement for Federal Register publication. Even though we have waived this requirement, you shouldn’t construe this action to be approval of your request.2

We will consider fully the facts and circumstances contained in your petition and will process it accordingly.

We will advise you of the agency's final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions in the meantime, you may contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Frances Shaver Program Analyst Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Sirs, 

Timothy Gaffney <timothygaffney@gmail.com> 

Monday, June 17, 2013 2:52 PM 

Adams, Kevin (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST) 

PHMU Waimea-Kohala, Hawaii EAS 

For a few decades I have been involved with Waimea-Kohala Airport. I have seen EAS bid winning outfits 

come and go, and one unfortunately not deliver on EAS when the bid was zero. 

My vote is for Schuman Aviation. They are local, and believe me after making a study of the State of Hawaii 

(since the late 70's) it matters. 

Mokulele has put in writing an ambitious schedule for multiple trips to Maui and separate multiple trips to 

Honolulu almost every day of the week, should they receive the EAS. I don't foresee this ambitious schedule 

continuing with our demographic. This is a bit of a ploy to entice the community that does not realize that 

unprofitable trips will be trimmed down to something like what Mr. Schuman is proposing. That schedule is one 

trip between Honolulu and Waimea-Kohala in the morning and one trip in the late afternoon/evening. 

Kona to Maul and return is very readily available via the Kona International Airport ( 40-50 minute drive from 

Waimea_Kohala). With the very limited amount of passenger traffic to Maui ±rom Waimea-Kohala, Mokulele 

would soon drop the Waimea-Kohala/Maui trip from their schedule if they were to receive the EAS. 

I realize Mokulele is larger with more aircraft and seems better poised to enter this market with fewer logistical 

challenges. But knowing Mr. Schuman and watching his operation and modus operandi for many years, and as a 

resident of Waimea-Kohala I feel he would rise to the challenges of this service, add addtional aircraft and be as 

good as any in the shmi term and more importantly be here with community minded service in the long run. 

Something we have been lacking for many years. 

Thanks for your consideration. 

Feel free to contact me at (808) 987-9922 -IOGMT should you like to have additional information. 

Sincerely, 

Timothy Gaffney 

1