alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 11617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4618]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


PGI Energy, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

February 23, 2012.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
PGI Energy, Inc. f/k/a Tensas, Inc. (``PGI Energy'') because of 
questions regarding the accuracy and adequacy of representations by PGI 
Energy in press releases and other public statements concerning the 
company's business activities and contracts, and the nature and timing 
of a dividend the company announced to shareholders. PGI Energy is 
quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. under the ticker 
symbol ``PGIE.''
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the 
above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST, on 
February 23, 2012 through 11:59 p.m. EST, on March 7, 2012.

    By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4618 Filed 2-23-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 14-576V 

Filed: October 29, 2014 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

GREGORY SMITH * 

 * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

 * Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis 

v. * (“Tdap); Shoulder Injury Related to 

 * Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) 

 * 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Marvin Firestone, MD, JD & Associates, San Mateo, CA for petitioner. 

Heather Pearlman, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Vowell, Chief Special Master: 

 On July 8, 2014, Gregory Smith filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq,

2

 [the 

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. The petition alleges that as a result of a tetanusdiphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination on July 11, 2011, petitioner suffered 

an injury to his left shoulder and related sequelae. Petition at 6. 

On October 29, 2014, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report [“Respondent’s 

Report”], in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. 

Respondent’s Report at 5. Specifically, respondent submits “petitioner’s alleged injury 

is consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”)” and that 

 

1

 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to 

post this ruling and order on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the 

E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 

U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to delete medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted 

invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will 

delete such material from public access. 

2

 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2006). 
2

“based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for 

compensation under the Act.” Id. at 5. 

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

 s/Denise K. Vowell 

 Denise K. Vowell 

 Chief Special Master
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i at e f orpubl i c at i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OS E L UI S R AN GE L - L E DE S MA, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N os . 05- 71966 05- 75104 A ge nc yN o. A 076- 842- 691 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i ons f

orR e vi e w of

O r de r s of

the B o ar do f I m m ig r atio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I n th e s e c o n s o lid ate dp e titio n s f o rr e v ie w , J o s e L u is R an g e l- L e d e s m a , a na t i ve and c i t i z e n of

M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr at i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea lfr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s ( “ IJ ”) 

# FI LED SEP 24 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS05- 75104 2 r e m ova lor de r , and the B I A ’ s or de rde ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e ope n pr oc e e di ngs b a s e do n in e f

f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l. W e h av e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f

orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a lof am ot i on t o r e ope n. M a ra v illa

-M

a ra v illa v . A s h c r o

ft , 3 8 1 F .3 d8 5 5 , 8 5 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) ( p e rc u r iam ) . W e di s m i s s the pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w i n N o. 05- 71966, and gr antthe pe t i t i on f or r e vi e w i n N o. 05- 75104. T h e B IA ab u se dit s d iscr etio n ind eterm in in g th at R an g el-L ed es m a’s i neff ec t i ve as si st ance of coun se lcl ai m w as no tnew and cou l d h ave been pres ent ed du r in g th e p e n d e n c yo f

th e ap p e a l. See 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 2( c ) ( 1) ( e vi de nc e m us tnot h av e b e e n av a ilab le to b e p r e s e n te d“a t th e f o rm e rh e ar in g ” ) ; se e al

so B ha sin v. G on zales , 4 2 3 F .3 d9 7 7 , 9 8 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) ( e x p la in in g th at 8 C .F .R . § 1003. 2( c ) ( 1) r e qui r e s thatthe e vi de nc e m us tnothave be e n ava i l abl e t o be pres ent ed atthe form erhear i ng before the IJ ). W e do nota ddr e s s the pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w i n N o. 05- 71966 i n l i ghtof our d is p o s itio n in N o . 0 5 - 7 5 1 0 4 . I N N O. 0 5 - 7 1 9 6 6 : P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D. IN N O . 05 -751 04 : P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W G R A N T E D ; RE MAND E D.
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

CLOVIS GENO,

Petitioner,
v. OP 20-0395

MONTANA FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,

ROOSEVELY, HONORABLE DAVID CYBULSKI,presiding,

Respondent. 

### AUG 1 3 2020
Bowen Greenw000 Clerk of Supreme Coun State of Montana
ORDER

On August 7, 2020,Represented petitioner Clovis Geno (Petitioner)petitioned this Court for exercise ofsupervisory control in the underlying matter ofState v. Geno,Cause No.DC-20-6,Montana Fifteenth Judicial District Court,due to the State's alleged failure to timely comply with Montana Supreme Court Rule 97-326(I)(a)and § 46-1-401, MCA. Petitioner asserts that the State failed to timely file a notice of intent to seek the death penalty as required by Rule 97-326(I)(a), and further failed to properly specify and show supporting probable cause for one or more particular aggravating circumstances required for a death penalty prosecution under Rule 97-326(1)(a) and § 46-1-401, MCA; thus precluding prosecution of the case, and potential sentencing, as a death penalty case pursuant to Miller v. Mont. Eighteenth Jud. Court,2007 MT 149,337 Mont.488, 162 P.3d 121. Upon review ofthe Petition and supporting documents, we find that Petitioner has shown sufficient cause to require a summary response pursuant to M.R. App. P. 14(7). Therefore,pursuant to M.R.App.P. 14(7), IT IS ORDERED that the District Court and State of Montana are hereby granted twenty (20) days from the date of this Order to file and serve a summary response(s), separately or together, ifany,to the petition. 08/13/2020

Case Number: OP 20-0395

### The Clerk ofthis Court is hereby directed to provide immediate notice ofthis Order

to the District Court, Hon. David Cybulski, presiding, and all counsel of record in the underlying matter of State v. Geno, Cause No. DC-20-6, Montana Fifteenth Judicial District Court. DATED this W14 day ofAugust, 2020. 

# (94 /4 „tit, Justices

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WENDY A. SCHULTZ,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 657 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 04-14-00004-CR

POSS CHILD

OFFENSE: PORNOGRAPHY

DEVIN ALEXANDER KANE V. „llklTW „,-„„

STYLE: the state of texas COUNTY: KERR

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 216TM DISTRICT COURT

DATE: 02/11/15 Publish: YES TC CASE #: A1319

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ELECTRONIC RECORD

DEVIN ALEXANDER KANE V.

STYLE: THE STATE OF TEXAS cca# V?-/C 1XU'/€

APPFLLAhlT*** Petition CCA Disposition:

FDR ni.qr.RFTinNARY RFVIFW IN CCA IS: DATE:

Refused JUDGE:

DATE" /rt*>v ZO ZO/S' SIGNED:

JUDGE: /4l PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:
PROMISSORY NOTE TO FREZER INC.

FROM BIO-MATRIX SCIENTIFIC GROUP INC.





FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promise to pay the order of Frezer Inc., the sum of ten thousand and no/100ths US Dollars ($10,000), together with interest thereon at the rate of 10% per annum on the unpaid balance.



Said principal and interest shall be payable as follows:



1.  Principle is due December 30, 2006 and is Payable US Dollars and / or securities acceptable to Frezer's Board of Directors,



2.  Interest is due semi-annually from the date of the execution of this agreement and is payable in US Dollars and / or securities acceptable to Frezer's Board of Directors,



3.  This note may be called, extended or modified by approval of the Board of Directors of Frezer Inc., with thirty days (30 days) written notice to borrower.



4.  There is no pre-payment penalty should borrower decide to pay note off before the stated maturity date. Interest shall be calculated on a pro rata basis should note be paid off prior to maturity.



The undersigned may prepay this Note in whole or in part without penalty. In the event any payment due hereunder is not paid when due, the entire balance shall be immediately due and payable upon demand of the holder. Upon default, the undersigned shall pay all reasonable attorney fees and costs necessary for the collection of this Note,



This Note is executed to evidence an existing indebtedness due the payee from the undersigned on an open account balance as of this date, and this Note shall not be construed as a separate obligation.



Signed in agreement this 6th day of January 2006,



BIO-MATRIX SCIENTIFIC GROUP INC.



(Borrower's name)



/s/David Koos

Borrowers  Signature
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-2291

___________ Eugene Cortez Saunders, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Southern * District of Iowa. Gregory Frost, sued as Officer * Gregory Frost #942; Gregory Dickel, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 15, 2005 Filed: February 22, 2005

___________ Before MELLOY, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Eugene Cortez Saunders was stopped by Des Moines police officer Gregory Frost. Saunders fled a short distance, then stopped. During Saunders’s arrest, Frost struck Saunders with a baton on the back and right knee. Officer Gregory Dickel arrived later and allegedly stood on Saunders. Saunders later brought this civil rights action against the officers claiming excessive force. At his jury trial, Saunders introduced his medical records, which showed significant pre-arrest problems with his right knee, including a surgery nine years earlier. No expert testimony was presented showing a connection between Saunders’s knee problems and the officer’s* The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
-2- blows. At the close of Saunders’s case in chief, the district court * granted the officer judgment as a matter of law on the issue of proximate cause. Saunders appeals arguing he presented sufficient evidence of pain and injury to allow the case to go to the jury.
Although Saunders had surgery on his right knee months after his arrest to remove a loose body, he was diagnosed with a right knee loose body secondary to degenerative joint disease, right knee severe degenerative joint changes, and an ACL deficient knee. Contrary to Saunders’s claim that the baton blows broke his knee and caused the need for the surgery to remove broken bone, the medical records show the piece of bone that was removed was not broken off anything. Instead, the loose mass grew in Saunders’s knee because of joint disease. Saunder’s knee had a long medical history marked by earlier traumas and an earlier surgery. Under the circumstances, we agree with the district court that Saunders’s injury was sophisticated requiring Saunders to prove causation by expert testimony. Robinson v. Hager , 292 F.3d 560, 564 (8 th Cir. 2002); Turner v. Iowa Fire Equip. Co. , 229 F.3d 1202, 1210 (8 thCir. 2000). Because Saunders failed to do so, no reasonable juror could have found in favor of Saunders, and the district court properly granted the officers’ motion for judgment as a matter of law. Robinson , 292 F.3d at 563-64. We decline to consider Saunders’s argument that he should have been allowed to go the jury because he showed pain and suffering. Saunders failed to raise the argument in the district court.
Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
Kristine Arlitt

Attorney at Law

 206 East Locust Street 500 Main Street 

 San Antonio, Texas 78212 Kerrville, Texas 78028

 P.O. Box 90771 P.O. Box 295101

 San Antonio, Texas 78209 Kerrville, Texas 78029

 Telephone 210-821-6101 Telephone 830-896-5101

 Telecopier 210-821-6105 Telecopier 830-896-5102

July 9, 2015

Clerk of the Court Via E-File

Fourth Court of Appeals

Bexar County Justice Center, Floor 3

San Antonio, Texas 78205

RE: The Estate of Consuella Perkins Ulbrich, deceased

Cause Number 2011-PC-0686

Appeal Number 04-14-00812-CV

Dear Clerk:

Please take notice, I will not be available for any proceedings in the above referenced matter for the

following dates:

July 20, 2015 to July 28, 2015

September 3 to September 15, 2015

October 22, 2015 to November 2, 2015

December 17, 2015 to December 28, 2015

Respectfully, I request that no matters be set during these time periods. 

As always, please feel free to contact me directly with any question at 210-269-6101.

Very truly yours, 

/s/

Kristine Arlitt

Attorney at Law

cc: Bill Bailey Via E-Service

Philip M. Ross Via E-Service

Amy Bitter Via E-Service

William D. Crist Via E-Service

ACCEPTED

04-14-00812-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

7/9/2015 6:49:13 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7/9/2015 6:49:13 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1358 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2009 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize the Director of the United States Patent and 

Trademark Office to use funds made available under 

the Trademark Act of 1946 for patent operations in 

order to avoid furloughs and reductions-in-force. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

S 1358 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OF PTO DIRECTOR TO USE TRADE2 MARK FUND. 

3 (a) AUTHORITY.—The Director of the United States 

4 Patent and Trademark Office may use funds made avail5 able under section 31 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 

6 U.S.C. 1113) to support the processing of patents and 

7 other activities, services, and materials relating to patents, 

8 notwithstanding section 42(c) of title 35, United States 

9 Code, if— 

10 (1) the Director certifies to Congress that the 

11 use of such funds is reasonably necessary to avoid 

12 furloughs or a reduction-in-force in the Patent and 

13 Trademark Office, or both; and 

14 (2) funds so used are repaid to trademark oper15 ations not later than September 30, 2011. 

16 (b) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority 

17 under subsection (a) shall terminate on June 30, 2010. 

18 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

19 (1) DIRECTOR.—The terms ‘‘Director of the 

20 United States Patent and Trademark Office’’ and 

21 ‘‘Director’’ mean the Under Secretary of Commerce 

22 for Intellectual Property and Director of the United 

23 States Patent and Trademark Office. 

24 (2) TRADEMARK ACT OF 1946.—The term 

25 ‘‘Trademark Act of 1946’’ means the Act entitled 

26 ‘‘An Act to provide for the registration and protecVerDate Nov 24 2008 21:00 Jul 27, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1358.RFH S1358

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

S 1358 RFH 

1 tion of trademarks used in commerce, to carry out 

2 the provisions of certain international conventions, 

3 and for other purposes’’, approved July 5, 1946 (15 

4 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.). 

Passed the Senate June 25, 2009. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
The Board of Directors
Mosaix, Inc.:
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-18577, 33-93948, 33-88544, 33-51620, 33-41199, 33-41197 and 33-36617)
on Form S-8 of Mosaix, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") of our reports
dated February 2, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of the
Company as of December 31, 1997, and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows and the related
financial statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 1997, which reports appear in the Company's annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.
 
/s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
 
Seattle, Washington
March 10, 1998
1 

### T o n g, St a nl ey

Fr o m: M i c h ae l L ay bo urn < M L ay bo urn @a q m d.g ov> S e nt: W e dn e s d ay
, M a r c h 16

, 2016 10 : 03 AM

T o: T o ng, St a nl ey C c: V irgini a L a u; L a w, Ni c o le

S u b j ec t: C h a r b r o il e r t e s ting

H i E v e r y b o d y , Ju s t w a n te d t o p ass a l o ng CE-CER T ( t e s t k i t c h e n ) h a s l et u s k n o w t h e i r fir e s upp r e ssi o n s y s te m upg ra d e s w i l l d e la y
te s t i ng f o r up t o f o u r mo n t h s

. H o p e f u ll y i t w ill b e l e s s

. M i k e
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 135 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 135

  To decrease the matching funds requirement and authorize additional 
 appropriations for Keweenaw National Historical Park in the State of 
                               Michigan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2009

Mr. Levin (for himself and Ms. Stabenow) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To decrease the matching funds requirement and authorize additional 
 appropriations for Keweenaw National Historical Park in the State of 
                               Michigan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDING FOR KEWEENAW NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    (a) Acquisition of Property.--Section 4 of Public Law 102-543 (16 
U.S.C. 410yy-3) is amended by striking subsection (d).
    (b) Matching Funds.--Section 8(b) of Public Law 102-543 (16 U.S.C. 
410yy-7(b)) is amended by striking ``$4'' and inserting ``$1''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 10 of Public Law 102-
543 (16 U.S.C. 410yy-9) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$50,000,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$3,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$25,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``$100,000'' and all 
        that follows through ``those duties'' and inserting 
        ``$250,000''.
                                 <all>
```
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Northern Way  Resources,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

    1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  November 8, 2005


/s/ Keith Andrews
-------------------------------------------
Keith Andrews, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)