alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1956

DR. MARLA FAITH CRAWFORD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DAVID PATRICK CORRIGAN; HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & 

WELLMAN,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

SCHOOL BOARD FOR RICHMOND CITY,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:20-cv-00923-JAG)

Submitted: December 20, 2022 Decided: December 22, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1956 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 4
2

Marla Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Smith Palmer, HARMAN CLAYTOR 

CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1956 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 4
3

PER CURIAM:

Dr. Marla Faith Crawford seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her 

civil complaint for failure to state a claim, and two subsequent orders granting Defendants’ 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 motion for monetary sanctions and subjecting Crawford to a pre-filing 

injunction in future cases. We dismiss in part and affirm in part. 

With respect to the district court’s order dismissing Crawford’s civil complaint for 

failure to state a claim, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of 

appeal was not timely filed. In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district 

court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the 

district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal 

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil 

case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on May 12, 2021. The notice of appeal was 

filed on August 27, 2021. Because Crawford failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to 

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal as to this 

order.

As to the district court’s orders granting the Rule 11 motion for sanctions, we have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1956 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/22/2022 Pg: 3 of 4
4

orders. Crawford v. School Bd. for Richmond City, No. 3:20-cv-00923-JAG (E.D. Va. July 

28, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART,

AFFIRMED IN PART

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1956 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/22/2022 Pg: 4 of 4
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 20, 2021

No. 04-19-00206-CR

Joel ALEJANDREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-CR-101

Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

The en banc court has considered Appellant’s motion for en banc reconsideration; the 

motion is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.7.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of July, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kevin Rich, Chief Executive Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of PowerShares
DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Kevin Rich         
|Kevin Rich             
|Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2006



E-4
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.3

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the filing of the Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd. Form
10-K (the "Report") for the year ended July 31, 2002, each of the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Professional
Veterinary Products, Ltd.



/s/ Dr. Lionel L. Reilly

-------------------------------------
Dr. Lionel L. Reilly
President/Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Neal B. Soderquist

-------------------------------------
Neal B. Soderquist
Chief Financial Officer
(

Uonday, October 15, 2007 1 .( ( __

You, as vendor, are authorized to publish this advertisement in your newspaper, subject to the terms of this order, as

follows: Advertisement to be published in regular advertising columns, no position specuied; caption of two hues and signature

• to be in capitals and subjtct matter and title of otficerohe set

pjyeising; charge to be made at ihe ate charged to and paidby commercial advertisers for matter similarly set and

• occupying similar space; advertisement to be run in the editions specified above. Vendor agrees that, in the performance of any

contract awarded to it hereunder said vendor sull not c1sr.iiminate against any ernploye or other persons on account of race color

st,x ri.Iigious creed ancory age or national origin aria that the Commonwealth upon receipt of satisfactory evidence of suchdiscrimination; shall have the rightto cancel said contract. Réturnthis äopy at once if you will not cceptthis advertisement unde’rthe termsset forth. . . . . .

Proof of advertising in the form of a tearsheet must be included on Parts 1,2 & 3. Return original and two copies (signed

by the editor or publisher) to Agency listed above. Part 1 must be notarized. Part 4 is yours.

Commonwealth to be billed only for actual number of printed lines published.

ACCOUNT

FUND .OT : APP: YEAR LOG OR COSTFUNcTION Oi - AMOUNT

CODE 1

, j/ ((. ‘

11 I 1?) h 2 i -

INVOICE (To be completed by publisher): —

-

. DATE OF INSERTION ACTUAL NO OF pEINTrD L:l.ES

IstAd / . -. .•- : :. ..:

,

t,. : . •-• •—

2ndAd I

A 3rd Ad

- GRAND TOTAL—I”

‘S

PASTETEARSHEETHERE

Commqnwealth of Pennsylvania

Countyof ‘ij( •. r_• •,

Before me, the subscriber, a Notary Public in and for said County, pejçonally came ‘ 1•( (

who eing duly sworn doth depose and say that he is’ ( — ( ( i /i’)’ /.the (‘t U I ‘ Yfl-tc.- a general newspaper published at C J i5_ 1_5)L- that the advertisement of which tearsheet is attached hereto was published in the regular advertising columns of said newspaper

in the editions of sard newspaper, in all respects as ordered and invOiced above and that the Commonwealth Is not charged

thorefor at a rate higher than is charged any ordinary commercial advertiser for a similar amount of matter occupying similar space

apd 3et in a jmilar mannr in saidnewspaper

.N(: L?5 ••ij: i-i

— - - J- t /

Swaitt arid s bcribed beforeme this f ‘‘

.---‘ , , ,

dit :-‘ :-.‘S..: :“ :.•• . .:

/ Lk /t r,4 C //, SIGNATU1EOFAFFIANT

NOTARY PUBLIC . -. -_

/ /

My commission expires I o tanai Sea’ 1: C’ r itD’chàeiIy Notary Pubhc *Thjs affidavit must be made by the Owner, Pubiisher. or the designated agent of tieo’1etQr Sucks County

MyCorsPires 2O°

,AG.NCY (PENlltG) •• Norarles

COST PER LINE TOTAL AMOUNT

I —
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1994

In Re: TRACEY C. THARP, a/k/a Yvette Decker, a/k/a Tracie Davis, a/k/a Tracie Moody, a/k/a Tracey Davis Tharp, a/k/a Tracy Davis,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:04-cr-00034-RBS-JEB-2)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 20, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tracey C. Tharp, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tracey C. Tharp petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the Bureau of Prisons to let her finish her prison sentence in home confinement. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. &

Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Tharp has not demonstrated that she has a clear right to the relief sought, nor has she demonstrated that the district court has a duty to grant that relief. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I, Mark Gatto, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofCĪON Investment Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to me byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

(a)    All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

Date:November 13, 2013

 

|   | /s/ Mark Gatto

Mark  Gatto  Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President

*(Principal Executive Officer)* |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | CĪON  Investment Corporation                                                                         |

 

 

----
Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alan J. Power, President and Chief Executive Officer of Decoma International Inc. (the "Registrant"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1.                   | the annual report on Form 40-F of the Registrant dated May 19, 2004, for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2.                   | the information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.                                                                                                                             
|Dated:  May 19, 2004 | /signed/ "Alan Power"                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|                     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             



|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1453 

To amend Public Law 106–392 to maintain annual base funding for the 

Bureau of Reclamation for the Upper Colorado River and San Juan 

fish recovery programs through fiscal year 2023. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2009 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. BENNET, Mr. BENNETT, and Mr. HATCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 106–392 to maintain annual base 

funding for the Bureau of Reclamation for the Upper 

Colorado River and San Juan fish recovery programs 

through fiscal year 2023. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau of Reclamation 

5 Fish Recovery Programs Reauthorization Act of 2009’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1453 IS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF BASE FUNDING FOR FISH 

2 RECOVERY PROGRAMS. 

3 Section 3(d)(2) of Public Law 106–392 (114 Stat. 

4 1602) is amended in the fourth sentence by striking 

5 ‘‘2011’’ and inserting ‘‘2023’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

WARREN EVANS,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 144 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of March , 2020, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the “Writ of Mandamus” is DENIED.
Record of Discussion

 FDMS Docket No. FAA-2013-0426

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Yosha Mendis

(613) 952-4388

04/23/13 No Objections

Bombardier 

Aerospace

Catherine Auger

(514) 855-5001

X 61571

04/23/13 No Objections

N/A N/A N/A N/A
March 3 , 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

STEPHEN JOSEPH ALTOBELLO , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00988

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell ee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the motion of the appellant to withdraw notice of appeal. Having considered the motion the Court orders the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2 MB)

Tags:Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, Lean Six Sigma, : Defense Logistics Agency, Lean Six Sigma Green Belt, Continious Process Improvement 

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 323 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 323

 Expressing the sense of the Senate on maintaining the current annual 
adjustment in retired pay for members of the Armed Forces under the age 
                                 of 62.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 18, 2013

Mr. Chambliss (for himself, Mr. Isakson, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. McCain, Mr. 
   Hoeven, Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin, Ms. Collins, Mr. Blunt, and Mr. 
Portman) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate on maintaining the current annual 
adjustment in retired pay for members of the Armed Forces under the age 
                                 of 62.

Whereas it is the responsibility of Congress to get the fiscal house of 
        government in order, and all government spending should be examined to 
        achieve that goal;
Whereas H.J. Res. 59 (113th Congress), a bipartisan budget proposal, is a first 
        step in this direction, though it fails to address broader government 
        spending issues;
Whereas retirees from the Armed Forces, both those who served a full career and 
        those medically retired and their survivors, have provided great service 
        and sacrificed much for our country;
Whereas H.J. Res. 59 (113th Congress) disproportionally targets these military 
        retirees in the name of fiscal responsibility; and
Whereas, while the decisions regarding future spending cuts may be difficult and 
        painful, the solution should require contributions from all Americans: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) retirees from the Armed Forces should not unfairly bear 
        the burden of excessive government spending;
            (2) military retirees earned the benefits they were 
        promised upon entering the military, and it is the duty of the 
        Senate to protect them; and
            (3) the Senate should seek alternatives to the provisions 
        of section 403 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (introduced 
        as H.J. Res. 59 (113th Congress)) before the effective date of 
        that section and the amendments made by that section.
                                 <all>
```