alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-2224

___________________________

Brian Billings

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Batesville

____________

 Submitted: March 7, 2016 

Filed: March 18, 2016 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Brian Billings appeals the district court’s1

 order affirming the Commissioner’s

denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, after his

hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ). For reversal, Billings argues that

the ALJ’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole,

and in particular, he challenges the ALJ’s severity and credibility determinations; the

ALJ’s residual functional capacity (RFC) finding; and the ALJ’s decision to credit

some physicians’ opinions in the record over other physician’s opinions, including the

opinion of consultative medical examiner Anandaraj Subramanium, M.D.

Following careful de novo review, we conclude that substantial evidence in the

record as a whole supports the denial of Billings’s applications, see Halverson v.

Astrue, 600 F.3d 922, 929-31(8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review), including the ALJ’s

determination on which impairments were severe, see Kirby v. Astrue, 500 F.3d 705,

707-08 (8th Cir. 2007); the credibility determinations, see Perks v. Astrue, 687 F.3d

1086, 1092-93 (8th Cir. 2012); the assessment of RFC, see id. at 1092; and the

decision to discount Dr. Subramanium’s opinion on the severity of Billings’s

limitations, see Estes v. Barnhart, 275 F.3d 722, 725 (8th Cir. 2002).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent

of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.3 MB)

Tags:DSCR, Defense Supply Center Richmond, JFHQ, HQ, Virginia, ribbon-cutting, Virginia National Guard, new building

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:43 PM

To: 'mogriffin@earthlink.net'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Information: G5 Drones



### May 12, 2015

Dear Mr. Griffin:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0560). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, S ection 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operat ion please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by May 26, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.5


                           Amendment Number 3 to the

    Automatic Flexible Premium Variable Life Reinsurance Agreement Number 2
                         (Referred to as the Agreement)

                                    Between

                   WESTERN RESERVE LIFE ASSURANCE CO. OF OHIO
                            St. Petersburg, Florida
                         (referred to as the Reinsured)

                                      and

                       WMA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
                               Hamilton, Bermuda
                         (referred to as the Reinsurer)


                           Effective February 1, 2000


Amendment Number 1 to the Agreement is hereby rendered null and void.


                                   * * * * *

Except as expressed herein, all terms, covenants and provisions of the
Automatic Flexible Premium Variable Life Reinsurance Agreement Number 2 that
are not in conflict with the provisions of this amendment shall remain
unaltered and in full force and effect.

In witness of the above, the Reinsured and the Reinsurer, by their respective
officers have executed this amendment in duplicate at the dates and places
indicated and shall be effective as of February 1, 2000.



  WESTERN RESERVE LIFE                        WMA LIFE INSURANCE
  ASSURANCE CO. OF OHIO                       COMPANY LIMITED

  at     St. Petersburg, FL                   at    Kamuela, Hawaii
  on     March 16, 2000                       on    March 20, 2000


  By:   /s/ Larry Kirkland                    By:   /s/ Edward F. McKernan
      -----------------------------               ------------------------
  Title:   VP & Managing Actuary              Title:      Vice President


  By:  /s/ Alan Yaeger                        By: /s/ Thomas W. Montgomery
      -----------------------------               ------------------------
  Title:  EVP                                 Title:   Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1558

STEPHEN THOMAS YELVERTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

YELVERTON FARMS, LTD.; PHYLLIS Y. EDMUNDSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:14-cv-00365-FL)

Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 23, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Thomas Yelverton, Appellant Pro Se. John C. Bircher, 

III, WHITE & ALLEN, PA, New Bern, North Carolina; John Pierce 

Marshall, Matthew Scott Sullivan, WHITE & ALLEN, PA, Kinston, 

North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Thomas Yelverton appeals from the district court’s 

orders dismissing his complaint against Yelverton Farms, Ltd., 

and Phyllis Y. Edmundson for lack of standing and for failure to 

state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and denying his 

motion for reconsideration and for leave to amend the complaint. 

We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on 

appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Yelverton v. Yelverton Farms, 

Ltd., No. 5:14-cv-00365-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 2015; Apr. 22, 

2015). We deny Yelverton’s motion to remand the case, and we 

deny his motion for leave to file a supplemental brief 

addressing issues he intends to present on appeal from an order 

entered in a separate case in the district court. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 15-2224

___________________________ Brian Billings lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Batesville

____________ Submitted: March 7, 2016 Filed: March 18, 2016 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Brian Billings appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits a nd supplemental security income, after his hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ). For reversal, Billings argues that the ALJ’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, and in particular, he challe nges the ALJ’s severity and cr edibility determinations; the ALJ’s residual functional capacity (RFC) fi nding; and the ALJ’s decision to credit some physicians’ opinions in the record over other physician’s opinions, including the opinion of consultative medical examiner Anandaraj Subramanium, M.D. Following careful de novo revi ew, we conclude that substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the deni al of Billings’s applications, see Halverson v. Astrue , 600 F.3d 922, 929-31(8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review), including the ALJ’s determination on which impairments were severe, see Kirby v. Astrue , 500 F.3d 705, 707-08 (8th Cir. 2007); the credibility determinations, see Perks v. Astrue , 687 F.3d 1086, 1092-93 (8th Cir. 2012); the assessment of RFC, see id. at 1092; and the decision to discount Dr. Subramanium’s opinion on the severity of Billings’s limitations, see Estes v. Barnhart , 275 F.3d 722, 725 (8th Cir. 2002). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United Stat es Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). -2-
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12106-12107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4623]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

Kapka Butte Sno-Park Construction

AGENCY: Western Federal Lands Highway Division, Federal Highway 
Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of the Federal Highway Administration's designation as 
Joint-Lead Agency for the Kapka Butte Sno-Park Construction project.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that the 
FHWA is officially designated as the Joint-Lead Agency pursuant to 23 
U.S.C. 139(c)(1) for the Kapka Butte Sno-Park Construction project 
which is being studied in an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under 
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

DATES: Comments concerning this notice must be received by 30 days 
following the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David K. Kennedy--Environmental 
Program Manager, Western Federal Lands Highway Division, 360-619-7967.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 2, 2009 the United States Forest 
Service (USFS) published a ``Notice of Intent'' in the Federal Register 
at (Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 1/Friday, January 2, 2009/Notices) to 
develop an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Kapka Butte 
Sno-Park Construction project. FHWA is providing funding to the USFS, 
the Federal Lead Agency, for the proposed project. The project includes 
construction of a new sno-park to accommodate motorized and non-
motorized trail use.
    The proposed sno-park would be located on National Forest lands on 
the Deschutes National Forest between Kapka Butte and the junction of 
Forest Road 46 (Cascade Lakes Highway) and Forest Road 45 (Sunriver 
cutoff). The proposed sno-park area is located about 30 miles west of 
Bend, Oregon; it is

[[Page 12107]]

located in Section 35, Township 18S, Range 9E.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)

    Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).

    Issued on: February 22, 2012.
David K. Kennedy,
Environmental Program Manager, Federal Highway Administration, 
Vancouver, Washington.
[FR Doc. 2012-4623 Filed 2-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
**Exhibit 10.35**

 

REVOLVING NOTE 

 

 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED,the undersigned, (hereinafter “Co-Borrowers”), hereby, jointly and severally, PROMISES TO PAY to the order of FLEET CAPITAL CORPORATION (“Lender”), or its registered assigns, at the principal office of Fleet Capital Corporation,as agent for such Lender, or at such other place in the United States of America as the holder of this Note may designate from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately available funds, the principalamount of FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS ($50,000,000.00) or such lesser principal amount as may be outstanding pursuant to the Loan Agreement (as hereinafter defined) with respect to the Revolving Credit Loan, together with interest on the unpaid principalamount of this Note outstanding from time to time. 

 

This Noteis one of the Revolving Credit Notes referred to in, and issued pursuant to, that certain Fourth Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of October     , 2004, by and among Co-Borrowers, the lendersignatories thereto (including Lender) and Fleet Capital Corporation (“Fleet”), as agent for such Lenders (Fleet in such capacity “Agent”) (hereinafter amended from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”), and is entitledto the benefit and security of the Loan Agreement. All of the terms, covenants and conditions of the Loan Agreement and the Security Documents are hereby made a part of this Note and are deemed incorporated herein in full. All capitalized termsherein, unless otherwise specifically defined in this Note, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Loan Agreement. 

 

The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be payable in the amounts and on the dates specified in the Loan Agreement and, if notsooner paid in full, on October 24, 2009, unless the term hereof is extended in accordance with the Loan Agreement. Interest thereon shall be paid until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest rates and at such times as are specifiedin the Loan Agreement. 

 

Upon and after the occurrence, andduring the continuation, of an Event of Default, this Note shall or may, as provided in the Loan Agreement, become or be declared immediately due and payable. 

 

The right to receive principal of, and stated interest on, this Note may only be transferred in accordance with the provisions of the Loan Agreement.

 

Demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment andprotest are hereby waived by Co-Borrowers. 

 

 

***Revolving NoteSignature Page***

 

This Note shall be interpreted,governed by, and construed in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of Illinois. 

 
**PW EAGLE, INC.**, a Minnesota corporation and successor by merger to Extrusion Technologies, Inc.
By:
 
/s/ Dobson West
  
Name:
 
Dobson West
  
Title:
 
Secretary
**EXHIBIT 31.2** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Dirkson R. Charles, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of K & F Industries, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible For establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that    has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially    affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial    reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     /s/  DIRKSON R. CHARLES    Dirkson R. Charles
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

October 3, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 0058 8

- CV

Rene SAENZ , Carlos Saenz and Mae Saenz

,

Appellant s

v.

Ramon SAENZ , Javier Saenz, and Alvaro Hinojosa,

Appellee s

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11

- 10

- 16006

- CV Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presid ing



### O R D E R

The District Clerk's notification of late clerk's record is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to October 7, 2016.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed th e seal of the said
court on this 3rd day of October, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0483

Focus Ready Draft 7/28/2011

ENGINEER: Avcin \ AG

PV (kg/yr): 

 
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]

SAT (concerns) (07/19/2011):

Migration to groundwater: Moderate

PBT rating: P3B3T2 PMN: Health: 2; Eco: 3 //

Degradation Product: Health: 2; Eco: 3 // high concern

for toxicity of incomplete incineration products to

terrestrial organisms

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0483
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]

 

 
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0483
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0483
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]

 

 

 

 

 
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]

 

 

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0483
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110483.eng.txt[5/1/2013 1:43:22 PM]