alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
October 1, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TERRY MICHAEL NATIONS, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00791-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50219

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAYMOND CARSAREZ HERRERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-01-CR-425-ALL

--------------------

October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Raymond Carsarez Herrera appeals the sentence he received

following his guilty plea conviction for distributing cocaine. 

He argues that he was improperly sentenced as a career offender

under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Specifically, he contends that the

career-offender enhancement was error because his prior

convictions for using a telephone to facilitate drug offenses, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843, did not qualify as predicate

offenses for purposes of § 4B1.1 and that, to the extent that the
No. 02-50219

-2-

Sentencing Commission authorizes the enhancement based on such

convictions, it has exceeded its authority.

As Herrera concedes, his argument is foreclosed. See United

States v. Lightbourn, 115 F.3d 291, 293 & n.5 (5th Cir. 1997);

see also U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 & comment. (background); U.S.S.G.

§ 4B1.2, comment. (n.1). He raises the issue to preserve it for

possible Supreme Court review. The district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.
2012 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

11-13-2012 

# R ob e r t o S a n t o s;v

. D a v id B u sh

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al
D ock e t N o . 12-2963

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2012

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2012 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" R o be r t o S a n t os;v

. D a v id B ush " (2012). 2012 D e cisio n s . P a pe r 178. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2012/178

### NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 12

- 2963

____________ ROBERTO SANTOS, Appellant

v. DAVID L. BUSH; KAREN BALICKI

___________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civ. No. 09

- cv - 02018) District Judge: Noel L. Hillman

__________________________________ Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 October 25, 2012 Before: SLOVITER, VANASKIE and WEIS, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: November 6, 2012)

____________ ORDER AMENDING OPINION

____________ It appears that footnote number 2 of the opinions issued on November 6, 2012 was not complete. The complet e text of footnote number 2 is as follows:

### Several other psychiatrists employed by the DOC, other than Dr. Bush, evaluated Santos at various times and observed similar symptoms and made the same diagnosis of psychosis. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that an amended opinion shall be issued. The original filing date of the opinion will not be altered. The judgment is not impacted by the amendment. For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk Date: November 13, 2012
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132078-9 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. JERRY JAMES STANTON, Stephen J. Markman, Petitioner-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 132078-9 

 COA: 269221; 269222 

Tax Tribunal: 00-313568;

00-307323 

CITY OF COLDWATER,

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE LUIS ECHEVERRIA MAGANA,

AKA Luis Lara, AKA Alejandro Mendez,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General

,

Respondent. No. 16

- 70091

Agency No. A200

- 158

- 029

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Su bmitted March 13, 2018 **

Before: LEAVY , M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Jose Luis Echeverria Magana, a native and citizen of Mexico , petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 20 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 70091

denial of a motion to reopen , and we review de novo questions of law

. Najmabadi

v. Holder , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Echeverria Magana ’ s

motion to reopen, wh ere he did not include with the motion any applications or

sufficient supporting documentation for the relief sought

. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2 (c)(1) (“ A motion to reopen proceedings for the purpose of submitting an

application for relief must be accompanied by the appropriate application for relief

and all supporting documentation. ”)

.

W e do not reach Echeverria Magana ’s contentions regarding sua sponte

reopening. See Najmabadi , 597 F.3d at 986 (review is limited to the actual grounds

relied upon by the BIA)

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior National Park Service [2410-OYC]
 AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: Under the terms of the existing concession contract, the National Park Service intends to request an extension of visitor services in Mount Rainier National Park for a period not to exceed one year from the expiration date of the current contract.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         January 1, 2013.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Harvey, Acting Chief, Commercial Services Program, National Park Service, 1201 Eye Street NW., 11th Floor, Washington, DC 20005; Telephone: 202-513-7156.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The listed concession authorization will expire by its terms on December 31, 2012. The National Park Service has determined that the proposed extension is necessary in order to avoid interruption of visitor services and has taken all reasonable and appropriate steps to consider alternatives to avoid such interruption. Concession ID No.
Concessioner name
ParkMORA002-88
Guest Services, Inc
Mount Rainier National Park.
 Jo A. Pendry, Acting Associate Director, Business Services.


[FR Doc. 2012-4372 Filed 2-24-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-53-P
AFS-16-9633-E

April 18, 2016

 Exemption No. 10782C

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0279

Mr. Mario Cotumaccio

Aviation High School

45-30 36th Street

Long Island, NY 11101

Dear Mr. Cotumaccio:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 

10782, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the 

revised conditions and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated March 10, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Aviation High School for an amendment to Exemption No. 10782, as amended. 

That exemption, from §147.36 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), currently 

allows Aviation High School to conduct instruction with a student/instructor ratio greater than 

the designated 25 to 1 ratio. Specifically, the amendment you have requested would allow

Aviation High School to conduct instruction with a student/ instructor ratio of 28 to 1.

We are extending the current grant of exemption from § 147.36 to permit Aviation High 

School to conduct FAA-approved mechanic courses in the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 school 

years with a student/instructor ratio of 28 to 1, subject to the condition that Aviation High 

School ensures the facilities, instructional equipment, and instructor to student ratio continue 

to provide a level of safety equivalent to 14 CFR § 147.36.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10782, as 

amended, remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided 
2

AFS-13-582-E

by 49 U.S.C. §§106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, 

I have amended Exemption No. 10782, as amended, to allow Aviation High School to

conduct instruction with a student/ instructor ratio of up to 28 to 1, which is greater than the 

25 to 1 requirement specified in 14 CFR § 147.36.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10782, as amended, to June 30, 

2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 10782, as amended.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T J UNE 19, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 8

- 1 6 5 4 3 N o n - A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 7

- 0 0 2 0 8

- C R

- J

- 3 4

- M C R

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

L O N E L L B E R N A R D G A D S O N ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e M i d d l e D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( J u n e 1 9 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e B I R C H , H U L L a n d H I L L , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :

L y n n P a l m e r B a i l e y , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r L o n e l l B e r n a r d G a d s o n i n t h i sd i r e c t c r i m i n a l a p p e a l , h a s f i l e d a m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w o n a p p e a l , s u p p o r t e d b y a
b r i e f p r e p a r e d p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8

L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t

c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e
i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f m e r i t ,

c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d G a d s o n ’ s c o n v i c t i o n a n d

s e n t e n c e a r e A F F I R M E D

.

2
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned hereby certifies, in her capacity as an officer of Befut
International Co., Ltd. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of her knowledge:





(1)          
The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)          
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:  February
12, 2010





/s/
      Mei YuName:
      Mei YuTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer(principal
      financial officer and principal accounting
  officer)




This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# CAAssociates PtECEIVEO OPPT CBIC CBIC Control Number 

# 361129

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-1039 Document Control Office (7407M),

### %01~

## JUL23 AHtO: Sine30, 2014 Office ofPollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT)RECEIVED Environmental ProtectionAgency 1200 PennsylvaniaAve. NW 

### AUG O 

## 52014 Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Re: NoticeofOngoing Use of

## decabrom&f~~tim'e<f~mcfhoe) - MajiliteCorporation
Dear Ms. Hesla: Majilite Corporation is a surface coating facility, located in Dracut, MA, that manufactures synthetic leather products. These products are specified worldwide for a variety of market segments including retail, hospitality, contract and transportation. The company also specializes in the application ofprecision films for industrial markets. The synthetic leather is a polyurethane coated fabric and depending on the coating formulation and/or the substrate selection, the products can serve a wide variety offunctions. The polyurethane coating is cast on a release web and then laminatedtothefabric. Majilite has been serving customers for over 45 years and overthat time has developed many new and innovative solutions, based on customer needs. One such innovation was the introduction offire retardant fabrics. Majilite had been producing flame retardant fabrics using antimony-based coating formulations until Septemberof 1998. Those coatings met certain flame retardant criteria, but customers began demanding a more complex array of flame retardant parameters that the antimony-based coatings could not meet. In September of 1998, Majilite began using decabromodophenylether (decaBDE) as an additive in the coatings to provide fire retardant properties that met a broader range offlame retardant qualities. These coatings are now held to performances specifications measured by a variety ofstandard test methods, such as MVSS302, ASTM-84, FAR25, NFPA 701 and others. The added fire retardant properties satisfied customer needs without sacrificing other desired properties and Majilite has been providing these fire retardant products ever since. They are considered standard in avariety ofindustries. As these products have been well established in a variety of industries over the past sixteen years (well before April 2, 2012, the date decaBDE was proposed to be included in the rule), Majilite considersthe use ofdecaBDE to be an "ongoing use" that is exemptfrom the provisions of40 CFR 722

- SignificantNewUses ofChemicalSubstances. If you have any questions, please not hesitate to call at (978) 263-4895 or email at paul@pamurphype.com Sincerely,

Paul Murphy Project Manager
Cc: Bipin Lotia, Majilite Corporation



### 16RevolutionaryRoad, Acton, MA01720-3830 Phone: (978) 263-4895 • Fax: (978) 263-2191 • e-mail: oaul(a).oamurohvoe.com
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of RESCHEDULING a meeting for the transaction of National Science Board business.

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF ORIGINAL ANNOUNCEMENT:

83 FR 43710, published on August 27, 2018. The teleconference meeting was originally scheduled for Thursday, August 30, 2018, from 3:00-4:00 p.m. EDT.

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF POSTPONEMENT:

83 FR 44675, published on August 30, 2018.

# NEW TIME AND DATE OF MEETING:

This closed teleconference meeting of the National Science Board has been rescheduled and will be held on Tuesday, September 18, 2018, from 4:00-5:00 p.m. EDT.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Brad Gutierrez,                         *bgutierr@nsf.gov,*                         703-292-7000. Please refer to the National Science Board website for additional information. Meeting information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter, and status of meeting) may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​notices.jsp#sunshine.*

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant, National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2018-19927 Filed 9-10-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
June 02, 2014 Mr. Kevin Schlemmer Office of Aviation Analysis CityHall 208NorthFirstAvenue Alpena,Michigan49707 www.alpena.rni.us

U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Kevin, . ··,. i i

This letter is the formal response of the City of Alpena to the Department's request for comments regarding the aircarrier bid to provide Alpena EAS received May 15, 2014. We are very grateful that the incumbent carrier, SkyWest Airlines, has submitted a bid to continue providing Delta branded regional jetservice at ourairport. The SkyWest Airlines proposal for 12 round trip flights per week from Alpena_to Detroit is supported by the Mayor of Alpena, the Chairman of the Alpena County Board of Commissioners, the Chairman of the Alpena County Regional Airport Committee, the Airport Manager, the Executive Directorofthe AlpenaArea Chamberof Commerce, and the Director of Economic Development of the Alpena Area Chamber of Commerce. All have been directly involved with the EAS process and relations with SkyWest overthe lasttwo years. The County of Alpena recently invested $10,000 for a leakage study to determine the travel statistics of our region and SkyWest responded to that data with the revised schedule proposed in their bid. We appreciate their ongoing efforts to further improve theflight schedule to best suite ourbusiness and recreational travelers. SkyWest is one of the largest regional airlines in the nation, consistently profitable and provides excellent customerservice and reliable flight operationsto Northeast Michigan. Furthermore, SkyWest proposes to provide Alpena with service to Detroit under the Delta Air Lines brand and code, which is what our residents, businesses, and visitors have hadforseveral years. We again thank the Department of Transportation for working with us and for your continued service. We wholeheartedly endorse the SkyWest Airlines proposal and look forward to working with them well intothe future.

MatthewJ. Waligora Mayorof Alpena