alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1296 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1296

To increase the number of non-dual status technicians employable by the 
                            National Guards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2009

   Mr. Pryor introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To increase the number of non-dual status technicians employable by the 
                            National Guards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN NUMBER OF NON-DUAL STATUS TECHNICIANS EMPLOYABLE 
              BY THE NATIONAL GUARD.

    (a) Fiscal Year 2009 Limitation on Army National Guard of the 
United States Technicians.--Section 414(a)(1)(A) of the Duncan Hunter 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 
110-417; 112 Stat. 4429) is amended by striking ``1,600'' and inserting 
``3,200''.
    (b) Permanent Limitation on National Guard Technicians.--Section 
10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``1,950'' and inserting ``3,550''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      David
      W. Ze, Chief Financial Officer of China YouTV Corp.,


certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as enacted by Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended


March
      31,
      2007 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully


complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities


Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





(2)
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
      all


material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China YouTV
      Corp.





**CHINA
              YOUTV CORP.**Date: May
              14,
              2007
            By:
            /s/ David
              W.
              ZeDavid
              W. ZeTitle Chief
              Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
      other


document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that


appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written
      statement


required
      by Section 906, has been provided to China YouTV Corp. and


will
      be
      retained by China YouTV Corp. and furnished to the


Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request .
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year endedDecember 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jerry A. Dukes, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

Dated: April 30, 2007
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS






The Board of Directors and Shareholders
The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.:



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-71794) on Form S-8 of The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. of our reports dated
October 25, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of The Santa Cruz
Operation, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1996 and 1995, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1996,
and the related schedule, which reports appear or are incorporated by reference
in the September 30, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of The Santa Cruz
Operation, Inc.




 /s/  KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP
------------------------------

KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP

San Jose, California
December 18, 1996
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 283 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 283

To constitute the majority party's membership on certain committees for 
  the One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, or until their successors are 
                                chosen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 31, 2013

 Mr. Reid submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To constitute the majority party's membership on certain committees for 
  the One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, or until their successors are 
                                chosen.

    Resolved, That the following shall constitute the majority party's 
membership on the following committees for the One Hundred Thirteenth 
Congress, or until their successors are chosen:
    Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation: Mr. Rockefeller 
(Chairman), Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Nelson, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Pryor, Mrs. 
McCaskill, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Warner, Mr. Begich, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. 
Schatz, Mr. Markey, Mr. Booker.
    Committee on Environment and Public Works: Mrs. Boxer (Chairman), 
Mr. Baucus, Mr. Carper, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. 
Udall of New Mexico, Mr. Merkley, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Booker.
    Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship: Ms. Landrieu 
(Chairman), Mr. Levin, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Cardin, Mrs. 
Shaheen, Mrs. Hagan, Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. Markey, Mr. Booker.
                                 <all>
```
### Baltimore Serious A r ea MOVES Files

T o support its mobile source emissions MOVES modeling for the

Baltimore A r ea Serious O zone P lan, Maryland submitted hundreds of

fi les whose cumulative size is approximately 28 0 MB. Many of these

files are multi

- spreadsheet EXCEL files or model input and output files that are not easily converted to the pdf format for uploading to www.regulations.gov

. Because of the large number of files and the

format of these file

, they are not available for download from www.regulations.gov . Copies of the s e files are available for public inspection at the EPA Region III address listed in the Federal Register Proposed Rule document. For further information, EPA Regio n III's point o f contact (POC) is listed in this docket.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 27, 2019

NO. 03-18-00541-CR

Robert Thomas, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 390TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in 

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Exhibit 4.17





Exhibit 4.17




SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO THE EQUITY PLEDGE AGREEMENT




This Supplemental Agreement to the Equity Pledge Agreement (this “Supplemental Agreement”) is
entered into by and between the following parties on [August 18], 2009 in [Shenzhen]:



PLEDGEE:




Party A: Shenzhen Nepstar Pharmaceutical Coompany Ltd.




Registered address: Neptunus Building A-15B, Nanshan District, Shenzhen



PLEDGORS:




Party B: Feng Tu




ID No.: 320828196810190013




Party C: Liping Zhou




ID No.: 310104196310262825



(Party B and Party C are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Pledgors”.)




WHEREAS:



The Pledgee and the Pledgors have entered into the Equity Pledge Agreement on June 22, 2007 and
gone through the procedures for registration of the equity pledge. During the period of such equity
pledge, the Pledgee and the Pledgors have made another investment to set up a new regional chain
company. Therefore, the Pledgee and the Pledgors hereby enter into this Supplemental Agreement
through friendly consultation.



1. REGIONAL CHAIN COMPANIES




The Regional Chain Companies set out in Annex I to the Equity Pledge Agreement shall be
amended as follows:



	 	 	 
	Item

	 	Company Name
	1

	 	Shenzhen Nepstar Chain Co., Ltd
	2

	 	Ningbo Nepstar Chain Co., Ltd.
	3

	 	Dalian Nepstar Chain Co., Ltd.
	4

	 	Hangzhou Nepstar Chain Co., Ltd.
	5

	 	Guangzhou Nepstar Chain Co., Ltd.
	6

	 	Shanghai Nepstar Chain Co., Ltd.
	7

	 	Sichuan Nepstar Chain Co., Ltd.
	8

	 	Jiangsu Nepstar Chain Co., Ltd
	9

	 	Shandong Nepstar Chain Co., Ltd.
	10

	 	Qingdao Nepstar Chain Co., Ltd.
	11

	 	Tianjin Nepstar Chain Co., Ltd.
	12

	 	Fuzhou Nepstar Chain Co., Ltd.





 


 









 





Supplemental Agreement to the Equity Pledge Agreement (Domestic Residents)




2. EFFECTIVENESS




This Supplemental Agreement shall be executed on the date first written above, and shall
become effective on the date on which it has been duly signed by the authorized representatives of
the parties. This Supplemental Agreement shall be binding on the Parties upon effectiveness.



2. COUNTERPARTS




This Supplemental Agreement is made in Chinese with four (4) originals. Each of Party A, Party
B and Party C has one original, with the remainder used for registration and filing. Each original
shall have the same legal effect.


 


2









 





Supplemental Agreement to the Equity Pledge Agreement (Domestic Residents)




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed or have caused their legal representatives or
authorized representatives to execute this Supplemental Agreement on the date first written above.



[END OF TEXT]




PLEDGEE: SHENZHEN NEPSTAR PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.



Legal Representative/ authorized representative: /s/ Simin Zhang




Corporate Seal: /s/ Shenzhen Nepstar Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.



PLEDGOR: FENG TU




Signature: /s/ Feng Tu




PLEDGOR: LIPING ZHOU




Signature: /s/ Liping Zhou





 


3
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, James P. Cox, certifythat:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PQCorporation;

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  November 14, 2006
| ** ** | /s/ James P. Cox               |   |
|------------|--------------------------------|--------|
| ** ** | James P. Cox                   |
| ** ** | Vice President,  Treasurer and |
| ** ** | Chief Financial  Officer       |

 

1

----
#### The Public Service Commission, Appellant, *v.*The Central Railroad Company of New Jersey.

Argued Jan. 8, 1918.

Appeal, No. 192, Jan. T., 1917, by The Public Service Commission, from order of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1916, No. 264, reversing order of The Public Service Commission, in case of The Public *329Service Commission of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. The Central Railroad Company of New Jersey.

Before Brown, C. J., Mestrezat, Potter, Stewart, Mosohzisker, Frazer and Walling, JJ.

Reversed.

Appeal from Superior Court.

The Superior Court reversed the order of The Public Service Commission. The Public Service Commission appealed.

*Error assigned*was the order of the Superior Court.

*William, N. Trinkle,*with him *Berne H. Evans,*for appellant.

*W. L. Kinter, J. T. Brady*and *W. A. Barkalow,*for appellee.

February 25, 1918:

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Brown,

The question on this appeal is identical with that raised on the appeal of The Public Service Commission in the matter of the complaint against the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, January Term, 1917, No. 190, and, for the reason stated in the opinion this day filed in that case, the order of the Superior Court is reversed and that of The Public Service Commission is affirmed, all costs to be paid by the appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,208
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,761
<INVENTORY>                                     21,676
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,410
<PP&E>                                          27,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,119
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,373
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,221
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,119
<SALES>                                         97,984
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,715
<CGS>                                           50,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  133,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (628)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (204)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,846
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1073
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,773
<DISCONTINUED>                                  11,344
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,117
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to

Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Borland Software Corporation (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Dale L. Fuller, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and results
of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/S/    DALE L. FULLER  
|                       
|Dale L. Fuller         
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 15, 2004         



This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed
original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered July 27, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 15
- 00123
- CV BRINSON BENEFITS, IN C., Appellant
V. LINDA HOOPER, SEAN S ENDELBACH AND HOLMES MURPHY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellee s On Appeal from the 101st Ju dicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 12
- 07520 

### O RDER
B e fore the Court is appellant’s July 23, 2015 letter , attached to this order, informing the Court that certain exhibits contained in volume 20 of the reporter’s record wer e ordered sealed by the trial court, yet the reporter filed them unsealed

. Appellant request s to have th o se exhibits removed from the record and access to them restricted. We construe the letter as a motion and GRANT the motion to the extent we STRIKE v olume 20 of the reporter’s record and ORDER court reporter David W. Langford to re file volume 20 with the unsealed exhibits only. We further ORDER Mr. Langford to file, under seal, volume 21 with th e exhibits identified in the attached letter. The record of the exhibits shall be filed no later than August 10, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 11567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4372]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[2410-OYC]


Notice of Extension of Visitor Services--Mount Rainier National 
Park

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the terms of the existing concession contract, the 
National Park Service intends to request an extension of visitor 
services in Mount Rainier National Park for a period not to exceed one 
year from the expiration date of the current contract.

DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Harvey, Acting Chief, 
Commercial Services Program, National Park Service, 1201 Eye Street 
NW., 11th Floor, Washington, DC 20005; Telephone: 202-513-7156.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The listed concession authorization will 
expire by its terms on December 31, 2012. The National Park Service has 
determined that the proposed extension is necessary in order to avoid 
interruption of visitor services and has taken all reasonable and 
appropriate steps to consider alternatives to avoid such interruption.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Concession ID No.                Concessioner name                          Park
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MORA002-88............................  Guest Services, Inc.....  Mount Rainier National Park.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Jo A. Pendry,
Acting Associate Director, Business Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-4372 Filed 2-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-53-P