alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Tommy A. Moore, Jr., certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Kof First Investors Financial Services Group, Inc.

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.     The Company’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) forthe Company and based on such evaluation:

 

a)   Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

 

b)  Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport (based on such evaluation); and

 

c)   Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)   All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)  Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: July 29, 2005

 
|   | By: /s/ TOMMY A. MOORE, JR. |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | Tommy A. Moore, Jr.    |
|   | Chief Executive Officer     |

 

----
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1342 

To include Idaho and Montana as affected areas for purposes of making 

claims under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 

note) based on exposure to atmospheric nuclear testing. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2009 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. TESTER, and Mr. RISCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To include Idaho and Montana as affected areas for purposes 

of making claims under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note) based on exposure 

to atmospheric nuclear testing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF IDAHO AND MONTANA IN RADI4 ATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION. 

5 Section 4(b)(1) of the Radiation Exposure Com6 pensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note) is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

8 after the semicolon; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 1342 IS

1 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

2 after the semicolon; and 

3 (3) by adding after subparagraph (C) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(D) the State of Idaho; and 

6 ‘‘(E) the State of Montana; and’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of NewPage Holding Corporation and NewPage Corporation (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, George F. Martin, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of
the Companies.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ George F. Martin   
|George F. Martin       
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 12, 2011
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.84 MB)

Tags:Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of TechPrecision Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James S. Molinaro, the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Richard F. Fitzgerald, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: August 13, 2010
/s/  James S. MolinaroJames S. MolinaroChief Executive OfficerDated: August 13, 2010
/s/Richard F. FitzgeraldRichard F. FitzgeraldChief Financial Officer
VI 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 128 

For the relief of Jose Alberto Martinez Moreno, Micaela Lopez Martinez, 

and Adilene Martinez. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Jose Alberto Martinez Moreno, Micaela 

Lopez Martinez, and Adilene Martinez. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for the purposes of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Jose Alberto Mar7 tinez Moreno, Micaela Lopez Martinez, and Adilene Mar8 tinez shall each be deemed to have been lawfully admitted 

9 to, and remained in, the United States, and shall be eligi10 ble for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•S 128 IS

1 admitted for permanent residence under section 245 of the 

2 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) upon 

3 filing an application for such adjustment of status. 

4 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub5 section (a) shall apply only if the application for adjust6 ment of status is filed with appropriate fees not later than 

7 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

9 Upon the granting of permanent resident status to Jose 

10 Alberto Martinez Moreno, Micaela Lopez Martinez, and 

11 Adilene Martinez, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 

12 proper officer to reduce by 3, during the current or subse13 quent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that 

14 are made available to natives of the country of the birth 

15 of Jose Alberto Martinez Moreno, Micaela Lopez Mar16 tinez, and Adilene Martinez under section 202(e) or 

17 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

18 1152(e) and 1153(a)), as applicable. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of MangoSoft, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dale Vincent, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
                    /s/ Dale
      VincentChief
      Executive Officer (principal executive and financial
                      officer)August
      12, 2009




This
certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wolf Resources, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: March 5, 2009


/s/ Graeme McNeill
----------------------------------
Graeme McNeill
Principal Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer
AFS-14-332-E

June 30, 2014

 Exemption No. 11018

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0399

Ms. Erin Nolan

Parent of Parker Joseph Nolan

6263 Linden Lane

Dallas, TX 75230

Dear Ms. Nolan:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received June 18, 2014, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Parker Joseph Nolan for an exemption from § 121.311(b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Parker to exceed the 

specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by

AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States 

(U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Parker.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 

petition would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons 

with disabilities.
2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9834;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Parker Joseph Nolan an exemption from 

§ 121.311(b). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 

while Parker is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the 

extent necessary to allow him to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Parker’s parents or 

a caregiver accompanying him. Parker Joseph Nolan may only occupy a passenger seat with 

no passenger seated behind him. In addition, Parker’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of 

this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours 

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2019, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1483 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Alexandria, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Max J. Beilke Department of Veterans Affairs 

Outpatient Clinic’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2009 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient 

clinic in Alexandria, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Max J. Beilke 

Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 OUTPATIENT CLINIC, ALEXANDRIA, MIN5 NESOTA. 

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Af7 fairs outpatient clinic in Alexandria, Minnesota, expected 

8 to open in September 2009, shall after the date of the 

9 enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1483 IS

1 ‘‘Max J. Beilke Department of Veterans Affairs Out2 patient Clinic’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula4 tion, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

5 States to the outpatient clinic referred to in subsection 

6 (a) shall be considered to be a reference to the Max J. 

7 Beilke Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135868 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135868 COA: 282401 Genesee CC: 06-019049-FC HERBERT EARL ALLEN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 29, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 145 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 145

  For the relief of Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2009

   Mr. Akaka introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  For the relief of Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Vichai Sae 
Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree) shall be held and considered to 
have been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent 
residence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon payment of 
the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Vichai Sae Tung (also 
known as Chai Chaowasaree), as provided in this Act, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by the appropriate 
number during the current fiscal year the total number of immigrant 
visas available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under 
section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
`EXHIBIT 32

                                            SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS


I, David E. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, certify that

         this periodic report containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of
         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
         that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects,
         the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

Date:    April 13     , 2007
     -----------------

                                                      /s/ David E. Johnson
                                                     -------------------------------
                                                     David E. Johnson
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


I, Dee Dee Lowery, Chief Financial Officer, certify that

         this periodic report containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of
         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
         that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects,
         the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

Date:    April 13     , 2007
     -----------------

                                                      /s/ Dee Dee Lowery
                                                     -------------------------------
                                                     Dee Dee Lowery
                                                     Chief Financial Officer`
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 1, 2010 

# Order

September 1, 2010

139541-2(67)(72) 139544-5

GREAT WOLF LODGE OF TRAVERSE CITY, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 139541-2 v COA: 281398, 281404 Ingham CC: 06-001484-AA MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMI SSION, MPSC U-14593 Defendant-Appellant, and

CHERRYLAND ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, Defendant-Appellee.

_____________ _______________ _____________

GREAT WOLF LODGE OF TRAVERSE CITY, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 139544-5 v COA: 281398, 281404 Ingham CC: 06-001484-AA MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMI SSION, MPSC U-14593 Defendant-Appellee, and

CHERRYLAND ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________ _______________ _____________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, motions by the Mich igan Municipal Electric
Association for leave to file a brief amicus curiae and for extension of the time for filing
are considered and th ey are GRANTED.
**MEMORANDUM**

**Date:** January

31, 2014 **Subject:** Polyether Pol yols Production Risk Modeling File **From:** Nick Parsons, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/RCG **To:** EPA Docket File (EPA - HQ - OAR - 2011

–0435 ) The attached “PEPO_ModFiles_20130903.zip” file contains the emissions inventory used for the risk modeling of the Pol yether Polyols Production (PEPO) source category.
PEPO _M odFi le s_201 30903. zi p