alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
On behalf of Aerial Crafters Services, the Apollon Data Metrics Agency would like to supply the necessary topics regarding request for federal section 333 exemption, to Arnold Leon Carroll aka the owner and operator of Aerial Crafters Services..

Our client is requesting this exemption for the ability to use mobile drone services, regarding..

* Search and Rescue Assistance provided to local law enforcement

* Photography applicable to Nature, Agriculture Mapping, and Scenic Mapping

* Local Marketing Strategy regarding Business Progression to applicable clientele of Aerial Crafters Services

Our client is also in possession of the necessary documentation such as..

* Current Federal Regulations (CFR)

* Safety Protocols for Agricultural use

* Maintenance Operations using 3DR products as well as applicable to using all in public Certification.

In regards to the necessary hardware and items for using the drones for intended purposes. Our client is in possession of the following devices, as well as the sub-hardware to maintain complete functionality..

* 3DR Solo Drone

* GoPro Professional Imaging Camera

+ GoPro maintenance hardware

* Updated Computer

+ Updated Operating System

+ Area Mapping Software

* Third party Safety Items

+ emergency assistance kit

+ contact hardware in affiliation regarding safety circumstances

Thankyou for considering or client for Section 333 Exemption.
14910-I3-Pj '<OUTING SYMBOL

-7

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

Federal Aviation Administration

LNLTLALSi.IG

ROUTING SYMBOL

-(DC?

~;L;;::~

IlATE •

'D;LoJ~

ROUTlNQ SYMBO

CN-235-300 Airplanes, and Model C-295 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

Ainvorthiness Directives; EADS CASA (Type Certificate Previously Held by

RlN 2120-AA64

Constmcciones Aeronauticas, S.A.) Model CN-235, CN-235-1 00, CN-235-200, and

14 CFR Part 39 -(I

INrrr,LSlSlG

[Do,:~eJ;.No. FAA-2010-0640; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-I42-AD; Amendme t ljj~

\0Y'1Y ""

39-**;AD**IJ,OIO-J-3-0'6 o:~(,LIi)

-10 !

,l.

ROUTlNQ sn180L

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

DATE

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for the

OIiTING,YMBOL

products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness lNI1'lAlS',lG

infoffilation (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify 1"1"1':

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsan OlJTINGS¥MUOL

condition as:

NlTlA.lSISlG

ATE

Prompted by [an] accident * * '" the FAA published SFAR 88 (Special

Federal Aviation Regulation 88) * * "'. OLITI"'G SYMBOL

, ,

*

,

''''l'nA.lS,SlG

Fuel Airworthiness Limitations arising from the required systems safety T

E

analysis are items that have been shown to have failure mode(s) associated LL _

with an 'wlsafe condition' '" '" "'. These are identified in Failure Conditions

for which an unacceptable probability of ignition risk could exist if

specific tasks and/or practices are not performed in accordance with the
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Bennie H. Duck, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Kof First Investors Financial Services Group, Inc.

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The Company’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) forthe Company and based on such evaluation:

 

a)   Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

 

b)  Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report(based on such evaluation); and

 

c)   Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)   All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)  Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date:  July 29, 2005

 
|   | By: /s/ BENNIE H. DUCK   |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Bennie H. Duck           |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 10(b)


 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


 


We hereby consent to the use in this Registration
Statement on Form N-6 (File No. 333-45963) of our report dated March 31,
2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedules of Protective Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries, which appears
in such Registration Statement.  We also
consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-6 (File No. 333-45963)
of our report dated April 23, 2010, relating to the financial statements
of Protective Variable Life Separate Account, which appears in such
Registration Statement.  We also consent
to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Registration
Statement.


 


 


	
  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

  
	
   

  
	
  PricewaterhouseCoopers
  LLP

  
	
  Birmingham, Alabama

  
	
  April 30, 2010
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6975

YUESEYUAN CRUEL

- EL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; STEPHEN YARBOROUGH; HENRY MCMASTER; KATHERINE H. TIFFANY; W. MARSH ROBERTSON , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 6:18

- cv
- 01680

- HMH )

Submitted : November 29, 2018 Decided: December 4, 2018

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Yueseyuan Cruel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Yueseyuan Cruel

- El appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action

. * The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 63 6(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action and advised Cruel

- El that failure to file timely , specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon
the recommendation.
Th e timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). B y failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice , Cruel

- El has waived appellate review of the district court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We deny Cruel

- El’s motion for a temporary restraining order and injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument wo uld not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* We have jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court dismissed the action for defects that could not be cured by amendment to the complaint. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc. , 807 F.3d 619, 624 (4th Cir. 2015).
J-A31017-16

2017 PA Super 262

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 

Appellant

v.

ANGEL RIBOT

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 1190 EDA 2015

Appeal from the Order March 27, 2015

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County 

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0009168-2014

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., MOULTON, and FITZGERALD*, JJ.

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY FITZGERALD, J.: FILED AUGUST 15, 2017

I agree with the majority that the best evidence rule does not preclude 

the admission of testimony that Appellant was in possession of the buy 

money. However, I believe the trial court acted within its discretion when it 

credited Appellant’s evidence of a written policy requiring that the buy 

money be photocopied over the testimony regarding a change in policy. 

Thus, there was an adequate basis for the trial court to find a violation of 

departmental policy, which could give rise to a sanction. However, the 

preclusion of all testimony regarding the buy money appears to be a drastic 

remedy that is not supported by the circumstances of this case. Thus, I 

concur in the result. 

____________________________________________

*

Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 158 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the availability 

of industrial development bonds to facilities manufacturing intangible 

property. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Ms. SNOWE (for herself, Mr. KERRY, Mr. BROWN, and Mrs. LINCOLN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

the availability of industrial development bonds to facilities manufacturing intangible property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF AVAILABILITY OF INDUSTRIAL 

4 DEVELOPMENT BONDS TO FACILITIES MANU5 FACTURING INTANGIBLE PROPERTY. 

6 (a) EXPANSION TO INTANGIBLE PROPERTY.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section 

8 144(a)(12)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

9 (defining manufacturing facility) is amended— 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 158 IS

1 (A) by inserting ‘‘, creation,’’ after ‘‘used 

2 in the manufacturing’’, and 

3 (B) by inserting ‘‘or intangible property 

4 which is described in section 197(d)(1)(C)(iii)’’ 

5 before the period at the end. 

6 (2) CLARIFICATION.—The last sentence of sec7 tion 144(a)(12)(C) of such Code is amended to read 

8 as follows: ‘‘For purposes of the first sentence of 

9 this subparagraph, the term ‘manufacturing facility’ 

10 includes— 

11 ‘‘(i) facilities which are functionally 

12 related and subordinate to a manufac13 turing facility (determined without regard 

14 to this clause), and 

15 ‘‘(ii) facilities which are directly re16 lated and ancillary to a manufacturing fa17 cility (determined without regard to this 

18 clause) if— 

19 ‘‘(I) such facilities are located on 

20 the same site as the manufacturing 

21 facility, and 

22 ‘‘(II) not more than 25 percent 

23 of the net proceeds of the issue are 

24 used to provide such facilities.’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•S 158 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of 

3 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.1

FIRST INVESTORS FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report of First Investors Financial Services Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended April 30, 2002 (the
"Report"), I, Tommy A. Moore, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                         |  |                                                                  
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 29, 2002 |  | /s/TOMMY A. MOORE, JR.Tommy A. Moore, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer

The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K/A or as a separate
disclosure document.

---

QuickLinks
Order entered April 14, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01356-CR

ELIZABETH HENDERSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-63121-Q

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On March 17, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the clerk’s 

and reporter’s records had not been filed. On March 18, 2014, we received the clerk’s record. 

On April 11, 2014, we received the reporter’s record. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the 

appeal, we VACATE the March 17, 2014 order requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 13056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04395]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9784-9]

Office of Environmental Information; Announcement of Availability 
and Comment Period for the Draft Quality Standard for Environmental 
Data Collection, Production, and Use by Non-EPA (External) 
Organizations and Two Associated QA Handbooks; Extension of Comment 
Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency published a document in 
the Federal Register of December 26, 2012, concerning request for 
comments for the Draft Quality Standard for Environmental Data 
Collection, Production, and Use by Non-EPA (External) Organizations and 
two associated QA Handbooks. The notice of availability is being 
extended to a 90 day review and comment period to provide more time for 
external reviewers to provide comments. This document extends the 
comment period for 28 days, from February 28, 2013, to March 29, 2013.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 29, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Warren, Environmental Protection 
Agency; 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, MC 2811R; Washington, DC 20460; 
Phone: 202-564-6876; email address: quality@epa.gov.

    Dated: February 20, 2013.
Monica D. Jones,
Director, Quality Staff.
[FR Doc. 2013-04395 Filed 2-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Donald J. Stephens, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 ofWauwatosa Holdings, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: November 2, 2005 /s/ Donald J. Stephens  DonaldJ. StephensChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
-36-
Exhibit 24.8



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Lionel Reilly, or Neal Soderquist, or either of them, attorney for me and in my
name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PROFESSIONAL VETERINARY PRODUCTS, LTD. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2003, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with
respect to the registration of the common stock of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd., and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this
 day of October, 2003.



/s/ William SwartzWilliam Swartz




|STATE OF VIRGINIA |  | )           
|----------------- |  | ------------
|                  |  | )        ss.
|COUNTY OF LOUDOUN |  | )           



On this 24th day of
October, 2003, before me, a Notary Public qualified for said County, personally came William Swartz, known to me to be the identical person who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the execution thereof to be his voluntary act and
deed.



/s/ illegibleNotary PublicMy commission expires:3/31/07
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

James Mark Jokel

, * From the 2 66 th District Court

of Erath County,

Trial Court No. CR 15254

.

Vs. No. 11

- 20

- 00 087

- CR * February 17 , 20 2 2

The State of Texas

, * Opinion by Trotter , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion,

we reverse the judgment of the trial court, and we remand this cause to the trial

court for furt her proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion

.
MEMORANDUM

Date: January 31, 2014

Subject: Polyether Polyols Production Risk Modeling File

From: Nick Parsons, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/RCG

To: EPA Docket File (EPA-HQ-OAR-2011–0435)

The attached “PEPO_ModFiles_20130903.zip” file contains the emissions inventory used for the 

risk modeling of the Polyether Polyols Production (PEPO) source category.

PEPO_ModFiles_201

30903.zip
Exhibit
10.1

    
      


      Memorandum
of Understanding, dated April 21, 2010,

      by an
between China Auto Logistics Inc. and

      Chongqing
Qizhong Technology Development Corporation.
Exhibit 32.1  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral PartnerBy:/s/ Brenda G. GujralName:Brenda G. GujralTitle:President of the General Partner andprincipal executive officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.Date:March 12, 2010
Exhibit 10.1(b)


         Schedule of Secured Convertible Note (new financings) Issued by
              NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on December 15, 2006


   Issue Date        Due Date          Principal           Conversion Price
   ----------        --------          ---------           ----------------
    12/15/06         06/15/07          $600,000         Greater of: (i) $0.0029;
                                                        or (ii) the par value of
                                                        NCT Group, Inc.
                                                        common stock on the
                                                        date of conversion
Statement on toxicological data: 

 has not completed any toxicological studies on the LVE substance. The data provided 

is based on structurally similar products that are sold into the personal care markets. The data 

provide may be used as read across data. We would expect the same lack of adverse effects if 

the LVE substance was tested. 

Substance 1 – 

Substance 2 – 

Substance 3 -