alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Hans Ephraimson, Chief Executive Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of DB Commodity Index Tracking
Master Fund (the Master Fund), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Master Funds Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Master Fund.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 25, 2010 |  | /s/ Hans Ephraimson    
|                     |  | Hans Ephraimson        
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer



E-8
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6975

YUESEYUAN CRUEL-EL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF 

SOCIAL SERVICES; STEPHEN YARBOROUGH; HENRY MCMASTER; 

KATHERINE H. TIFFANY; W. MARSH ROBERTSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:18-cv-01680-HMH)

Submitted: November 29, 2018 Decided: December 4, 2018

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yueseyuan Cruel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Yueseyuan Cruel-El appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action.

*

 The district court referred this case to a magistrate 

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended 

dismissing the action and advised Cruel-El that failure to file timely, specific objections 

to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon 

the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is 

necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the 

parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 

F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). By 

failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice, Cruel-El has waived 

appellate review of the district court’s order.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We deny Cruel-El’s 

motion for a temporary restraining order and injunction. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * We have jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court dismissed the 

action for defects that could not be cured by amendment to the complaint. See Goode v. 

Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 624 (4th Cir. 2015).
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00224

- CR

L EONIDAS H ERNANDEZ R ODRIGUEZ

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from Criminal District

Court No. 4

of Tarrant County ( 1788542 )

April 4, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in th e tri al court’s judgment s . It is ordered that the judgment s of the

trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

Justice Dabney Bassel
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 23.3



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-64002) of PW Eagle, Inc. of our report dated June
22, 2001 relating to the financial statements of the PWPipe Employees' Savings
Plan which appears in this Amendment No. 1 (on Form 10-K/A) to the PW Eagle,
Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                        /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 27, 2001
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 583 

Designating November 30, 2014, as ‘‘Drive Safer Sunday’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2014 

Mr. ISAKSON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating November 30, 2014, as ‘‘Drive Safer Sunday’’. 

Whereas motor vehicle travel is the primary means of transportation in the United States; 

Whereas every individual traveling on the roads and highways 

needs to drive in a safer manner to reduce deaths and 

injuries that result from motor vehicle accidents; 

Whereas according to the National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration, wearing a seat belt saves as many as 

15,000 lives each year; and 

Whereas the Sunday after Thanksgiving is the busiest highway traffic day of the year: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) encourages— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 583 IS 

1 (A) high schools, colleges, universities, ad2 ministrators, teachers, primary schools, and 

3 secondary schools to launch campus-wide edu4 cational campaigns to urge students to focus on 

5 safety when driving; 

6 (B) national trucking firms to alert their 

7 drivers to be especially focused on driving safely 

8 on the Sunday after Thanksgiving, and to pub9 licize the importance of the day through use of 

10 the Citizens Band Radio Service and at truck 

11 stops across the United States; 

12 (C) clergies to remind their congregations 

13 to travel safely when attending services and 

14 gatherings; 

15 (D) law enforcement personnel to remind 

16 drivers and passengers to drive safely, particu17 larly on the Sunday after Thanksgiving; 

18 (E) motorists to drive safely, not just dur19 ing the holiday season, but every time they get 

20 behind the wheel; and 

21 (F) all people of the United States to un22 derstand the life-saving importance of wearing 

23 a seat belt and to use the Sunday after Thanks24 giving as an opportunity to educate themselves 

25 about highway safety; and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 583 IS 

1 (2) designates November 30, 2014, as ‘‘Drive 

2 Safer Sunday’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, in
his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Befut International Co., Ltd. (the
“Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:





(1)
               
The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)               
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








Dated:
      November 16, 2009/s/ Hongbo CaoName:
      Hongbo CaoPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-ELP-0794



 Exhibit 10.21 

6-1162-ELP-0794 
 United Air Lines, Inc.

 P. O. Box 66100 
 Chicago, IL
60601-0100 
  

			
	Subject:	  	[CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] Program 
		
	Reference:	  	Purchase Agreement No. 3427 (Purchase Agreement) between The Boeing Company (Boeing) and United Air Lines, Inc. (Customer) relating to Model 787-8 aircraft (Aircraft)


 This letter agreement (Letter Agreement) amends and supplements the Purchase Agreement. All terms used but not
defined in this Letter Agreement have the same meaning as in the Purchase Agreement. 
 In consideration of Customer executing
the Purchase Agreement and fully performing obligations under such Purchase Agreement including taking delivery of no less than twenty-five (25) Boeing model 787 aircraft, Boeing agrees to provide the special considerations set forth below for
Customer’s [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]. 

1. [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] 

2. Administration of the [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]

 2.1 Annual Confirmation. Customer shall annually confirms in writing that the [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED
SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] 
 2.2. Annual Review. [CONFIDENTIAL
MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] 







 3. Documentation [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST
FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] 
 4. [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] 







 5. Assignment. 

The rights and obligations described in this Letter Agreement are provided to Customer in consideration of Customer becoming the operator
of the Aircraft and can only be assigned, in whole or in part, pursuant to Article 9 of the AGTA as amended by Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-IRS-0184. 

6. Confidential Treatment. 

Customer and Boeing understand that certain commercial and financial information contained in this Letter Agreement are considered by
Boeing and Customer as confidential and are subject to the terms and conditions set forth in Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-IRS-0182. 








			
	Very truly yours,
	
	THE BOEING COMPANY
		
	By	 	 /s/ Nobuko Wiles

		
	Its	 	 Attorney-In-Fact

	
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO this
	
	Date: February 19, 2010
	
	UNITED AIR LINES, INC.


			
		
	By	 	 /s/ Kathryn A. Mikells

		
	Its	 	
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



Attachment 







 United Air Lines, Inc. 

Attachment A to 6-1162-ELP-0794 

[CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC 

PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) (Act) the Department of Labor (Department) herein presents summaries of revised determinations on reconsideration regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers by case (TA-W-) number regarding negative determinations issued during the period of                     *February 13, 2011 through October 21, 2011.*                     Notices of negative determinations were published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271). As required by the Trade Adjustment Assistance Extension Act of 2011 (TAAEA), all petitions that were denied during this time period were automatically reconsidered. The reconsideration investigation revealed that the following workers groups have met the certification criteria under the provisions of TAAEA.                

After careful review of the additional facts obtained, the following revised determinations on reconsideration have been issued.

TA-W-80,125; Shine Electronics Co., Inc., Long Island City, NY: February 7, 2010.

                        I hereby certify that the aforementioned revised determinations on reconsideration were issued on                         *February 8, 2012.*                         These determinations are available on the Department's Web site at                         *tradeact/taa/taa_search_form.cfm*                         under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll-free at 888-365-6822.                    

 Dated February 13, 2012. 

Del Min Amy Chen,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2012-4583 Filed 2-27-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
u.s. Department of

Transportation

Office of the Secretary

Of Transportation

April 29; 2014

Ms. JoAnn Wolters

Gem Air LLC

31 Hamner Drive

Salmon, ID 83467

Dear Ms. Wolters:

t.,uY')O DO'. 10 .•.. 1. 1.<]' ~; I :;.. 0

'200 New Jersey Ave .• S.E.

Washington. DC 20590

I couldn't find the corrected resume for Dan Schroederin the document that you sent on April

18,2014. Please send the resume with corrected datesthat he served as Director of Operations

and Chief Pilot for Gem Air.

I also need account information from the Capital One 360 account on company/bank letterhead.

The Department does not accept online statementsto verify account information.

Additionally, what is the core business ofW&S EnterprisesLLC and what is their relationship

with Gem Air?

Will the financial forecast you provided for the proposed commuter operations remain applicable

for any l2-month period?

Please respond fully to this request within 30 days of the date of this letter. You may upload

your response via the web at www.regulations.gov or you may mail your response to u.S .

. Departnient of Transportation Dockets, West Building, Ground Floor, W12-l40, 1200 New

Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, D.C. 20590. In either case, your response should be filed in

Docket DOT-OST-2014-0020.

Please include a statement signed by a representative of the air carrier [who shall be a principal

owner, senior officer, or internal counsel of the carrier] indicating that, pursuant to Title 18 .

United States Code Section 1001, the information provided in response to this letter is true and

correct and that the aforementioned individual has not kDowingly and willingly falsified,

concealed or failed to disclose any material fact or made any false, fictitious, or fraudulent

statement in connection with the preparation or filing of the material submitted.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this letter or

the requested information, please contact me at (202) 366-9721' or via email at

Barbara.Snoden@dot.gov.

Sincerely,

Barbara Snoden

Transportation Analyst.

Air Carrier Fitness Division

Office of Aviation Analysis

cc: Docket DOT-OST-20l4-0020

Mr. Patrick Darling

POI for Gem Air LLC

FAA Boise FSDO

3295 Elder St., Suite 350

Boise, ID 833705

2
Exhibit
32.1





PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of InferX Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 (the
“Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:    
      July 13, 2009
                  /s/ B.K. GogiaChairman
      of the Board(Principal
      Executive, Financial andAccounting
      Officer)








The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not
being filed as a separate disclosure document.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 2013 - 0495 FROM: Nick Hutson, Energy and Strategies Group, Sector Policies and Programs Division RE: Docket Items 11827 - 11875 and 11876 - 1188 8 DATE: December 10, 2015 I am Dr. Nick Hutson. I was closely involved in the development, preparation, and drafting of the standards of performance for new electric utility generating sources under section 111 (b) of the Clean Air Act. All of the docket items noted above were co mpleted by or before August 3, 2015, the date of the rule’s signature. However, due to delays in electronic loading, docket items 11827 - 11875 were physically docketed in the early morning hours of August 4, 2015. Docket items 11876 - 1188 8 were inadvertent ly not physically docketed until later dates, but are cited in the preamble to the final rule and so were in existence and relied upon by the EPA by the date of the final rule’s signature.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Probe Manufacturing, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:  (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|             |                      |                        
|------------ | -------------------- | -----------------------
|May 16, 2011 | By: /s/ Kambiz Mahdi | Chief Executive Officer
|Date         | Kambiz Mahdi         |                        

The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the "Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



|Dated: September 30, 2003 |  | /s/ROGER M. LAVERTYRoger M. Laverty
President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note:
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and will be retained by Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Cole Distribution, Inc. and Cole Chemical & Distributing, Inc. v. 

Vexapak L.L.C., Antonio Gonzalez Cortez aka Antonio Gonzalez, Jr. 

aka Antonio D. Gonzalez aka Antonio D. Gonzalez Cortes and 

Antonio Gonzalez Cardenas, Princess Properties Limited Partnership, 

Cole International, Inc., and Donna F. Cole

Appellate case number: 01-16-00599-CV

Trial court case number: 2008-27646

Trial court: 125th District Court of Harris County

Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to abate this appeal until September 30, 2016 

while the parties engage in mediation. The motion is granted. This appeal is abated, treated as a 

closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this 

Court’s active docket without further order of the Court on September 30, 2016. All appellate 

deadlines are suspended while this case is abated.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 8, 2016
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-1845-18T3

ZEENA PAUL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BIJOY K. PAUL,

Defendant-Respondent.

_________________________

Submitted November 18, 2019 – Decided

Before Judges Rothstadt and Mitterhoff.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, 

Chancery Division, Family Part, Monmouth County, 

Docket No. FM-13-0890-12.

The Law Office of Rajeh A. Saadeh, LLC, attorneys for 

appellant (Rajeh A. Saadeh and Stilianos Michael

Cambilis, on the briefs). 

Law Office of Edward Fradkin, LLC, attorneys for 

respondent (Edward Peter Fradkin, of counsel and on 

the brief). 

PER CURIAM

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

December 3, 2019
2

A-1845-18T3

The matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties having stipulated to the 

dismissal of this appeal, it is hereby ordered that the appeal is dismissed with prejudice 

and without costs. 

Dismissed.