SERVED APRIL 2, 2012 

;;r[V\HTMENTOF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIOMNSPORTATIQN 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS -•-^^i:'i OPERATIONS 

WASHINGTON, DC - . .n n r. . , r 

In The Matter Of: 

COASTAL AIR 

TRANSPORT, INC., 

Respondent 

Docket No. FAA-2011-1005 

CaseNo. 2010SO700037 

ORDER SETTING A SECOND RULE 16 LITIGATION 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, AND DIRECTING 

RULE 26(f) PLANNING AND SUBMISSION 

On March 30, 2012 an Order Accepting Respondent's Answer and Granting/Denying 

Other Relief was filed. 

It is Hereby Ordered: 

1) Rule ) 6 Litigation Scheduling Conference: 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §n.205(aXl) and (7) and Civ. R. 16, the parties shall appear by telephone on Wednesday, May 23, 2012 at lliOQam Eastern time for a Rule 16 

Litigation Scheduling Conference. During this Conference the parties will discuss the issues in the dispute, their Jointly submitted proposed scheduling/discovery plan (see paragraph 2 iy^frci) and respond to any questions regarding disagreements not resolved in the 

proposed plan. During the Conference a final scheduling/discovery plan will be ruled 

upon, as well as any other related matters pursuant to Rule 16(c). The Office of Hearings 

will initiate the Conference by telephone call, contacting each party at the party's telephone number of record. A party may provide an alternate number by notifying the Office of Hearings at least 24 hours prior to the Conference. 

2) Rule 26(f) Attorneys' Planning Meeting, and Submission of Proposed Discovery Plan: 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.217 and Civ. R. 26{f), prior to convening with the 

Judge for the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, the parties shall privately conduct a Rule 26(f) planning meeting and prepare a jointly written proposed scheduling/discovery plan, which must be completed and filed with the undersigned Judge on or 

before Wednesday, May 16, 2012 (i.e., seven (7) calendar days before the Conference). 

In addition to filing the proposed scheduling/discovery plan by regular mail filing with 

the U.S. Department of Transportation's Docket Office, the parties shall file a working 

copy of the scheduling/discovery plan with the undersigned Judge at the Office of HearPage 1 of 2 
ings by fax, express carrier, or personal delivery. The certificate of service should refiect 

the manner of service. 

The Attorneys' Rule 26(1) planning meeting shall include a good faith discussion 

about the nature and basis of each party's claims, the possibility of resolving all or pari of 

the case, the scope and type of discovery (including electronic discovery) and the place of 

venue for hearing. During this meeting, the parties shall discuss matters identified in 14 

C.F.R. §13.217 and Rule 26(f)(2) and (3) as part of developing their proposed sciieduling/discovery plan. 

The parties' planning meeting should also include discussion about the sequence 

and timing of follow-up discovery, including whether that discovery should be conducted 

in phases to prepare for any filing of particular motions (e.g., limiting scope of trial, dispositive motions, etc). 

The deadlines in the parties' proposed scheduling/discovery plan should be mutually agreeable, with a view to achieving case resolution with a minimum of expense 

and delay. Any unresolved scheduling/discovery disputes should be clearly identified 

in the proposed plan, so that these disputes may be addressed by the Judge during the 

Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference. 

3) Conflicts with Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference Date: 

If a party develops an unavoidable conflict with the scheduled Rule 16 Litigation 

Scheduling Conference set in paragraph 1 supra, and wishes to modify the date/time of 

the scheduled Conference, the party shall first confer with opposing counsel about riiutually agreeable alternate dates, and then contact C. Diane Mays at the Office of Hearings 

(202-366-2132) as soon as possible after receipt of this Order, with at least three (3) mutually-agreed, proposed alternate dates/times for the Judge's consideration. 

tstrative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 

Page 2 of 2 
FDMS No. FAA-2011-1005 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30 

WilburWright Building—Suite 2WI000' 

ONE COPY 

George Logan, Agent for Service 

Coastal Air Transport, Inc., Respondent 

1131 King Street, Suite 204 

Christiansted, St. Croix, VI 00820-4971 

Michael Foster, President 

Coastal Air Transport, Inc., Respondent 

P.O. Box 3985 

Christiansted, St. Croix, VI 00822 

TEL: 340-773-6862 

Rashawn Rich George, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use ibe following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Cicrk, AGC-430.