alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                             BRITE VOICE SYSTEMS, INC.
                                    SUBSIDIARIES
                                    EXHIBIT 22.1


Brite Voice Systems Group, Limited
Brite Court, Park Road
Gatley, Cheadle, Cheshire  SK8 4HZ
UNITED KINGDOM

Brite Voice Systems Group, GmbH
Bleichstrasse 1-3
65183 Wiesbaden
GERMANY

Brite Holding AG
c/o Societe Fiduciaire Visura SA
Rue St-Martin 9
CH-1002, Lausanne
SWITZERLAND

Brite Voice Systems AG
Industriestrasse 12
CH-8305 Dietlikon
SWITZERLAND

Brite Voice Systems S.p.A.
Via Flaminia 173
Roma 00196
ITALY

Brite Leasing, Inc.
7309 E. 21st Street North
Wichita, KS  67206
USA

Brite Voice Systems Pte Ltd.
47-A, Kreta Ayer Road
SINGAPORE 089006

Brite Voice Systems S.A. (Pty) Ltd.
6 Sandown Manor
Stella Street
Sandown 2146
SOUTH AFRICA

BVSI, Inc.
c/o Griffin Corporate Services, Inc.
900 Market Street, Ste. 200
Wilmington, Delaware  19801
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1384

LEROY BLOUNT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NATIONAL CARD CONTROL, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-746-3) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: July 31, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. LeRoy Blount, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Michael DeCamps, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia; Mary A. Gambardella, EPSTEIN, BECKER & GREEN, Stamford, Connecticut, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Leroy Blount appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action based on a jury verdict. The proper standard for review of a jury verdict is stated in Price v. City of Charlotte , 93 F.3d 1241 (4th Cir. 1996). “Recognizing that we may not substitute our judgment for that of the jury or make credibility determinations, if there is evidence on which a reasonable jury may return verdicts in favor of Appellees, we must affirm.” Id. at 1249-50 (citations omitted). There is ample evidentiary basis to support the jury's verdict that the decisions by the Defendant, National Card Control, Inc., not to promote Blount and to subsequently terminate him was not the result of racial discrimination or retaliation. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Restated Financial Data Schedule
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                OCT-2-1997
<CASH>                                          32,702
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,822
<INVENTORY>                                      6,641
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,415
<PP&E>                                       1,171,564
<DEPRECIATION>                                 263,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,082,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,574
<BONDS>                                        500,753
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,422
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           491
<OTHER-SE>                                     448,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,082,612
<SALES>                                         39,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               592,017
<CGS>                                           41,351
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  307,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,825
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,261
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,475
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,643
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,349
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,349
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March 14, 2007,
accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of PW Eagle Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of PW Eagle, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-135627, 333-134514, 333-133773, 333-17027, 333-26047, 333-34492, 333-64002) and Form S-1 (File No. 333-130869).



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ Grant Thornton LLP         
|Grant Thornton LLP             
|                               
|Portland, Oregon March 14, 2007
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 565 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the President and the Secretary 

of State should ensure that the Canadian Government does not permanently store nuclear waste in the Great Lakes Basin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. LEVIN (for himself, Mr. KIRK, Ms. STABENOW, and Ms. BALDWIN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the President and 

the Secretary of State should ensure that the Canadian 

Government does not permanently store nuclear waste 

in the Great Lakes Basin. 

Whereas the water resources of the Great Lakes Basin are 

precious public natural resources, shared by the Great 

Lakes States and the Canadian Provinces; 

Whereas since 1909, the United States and Canada have 

worked to maintain and improve the water quality of the 

Great Lakes through water quality agreements; 

Whereas more than 40,000,000 people in Canada and the 

United States depend on the fresh water from the Great 

Lakes for drinking water; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 565 IS 

Whereas Ontario Power Generation is proposing to build a 

permanent geological repository for nuclear waste less 

than one mile from Lake Huron in Kincardine, Ontario, 

Canada; 

Whereas nuclear waste is highly toxic and can take tens of 

thousands of years to decompose to safe levels; 

Whereas during the 1980s when the Department of Energy, 

in accordance with the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 

(42 U.S.C. 10101 et seq.), was studying potential sites 

for a permanent nuclear waste repository in the United 

States, the Canadian Government expressed concern with 

locating a permanent nuclear waste repository within the 

shared water basins of the 2 countries; and 

Whereas a spill of nuclear waste into the Great Lakes could 

have lasting and severely adverse environmental, health, 

and economic impacts on the Great Lakes and the people 

that depend on them for their livelihood: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate— 

2 (1) the Canadian Government should not allow 

3 a permanent nuclear waste repository to be built 

4 within the Great Lakes Basin; 

5 (2) the President and the Secretary of State 

6 should take appropriate action to work with the Ca7 nadian Government to prevent a permanent nuclear 

8 waste repository from being built within the Great 

9 Lakes Basin; and 

10 (3) the President and the Secretary of State 

11 should work together with their Canadian GovernVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:30 Sep 20, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR565.IS SR565

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 565 IS 

1 ment counterparts on a safe and responsible solution 

2 for the long-term storage of nuclear waste. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000962 28-JAN-2014 11:09 AM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 98-4857

JACK SHERMAN WYATT,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation.

(CR-98-224-WMN)

Submitted: June 30, 1999

Decided: September 24, 1999

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

James S. Salkin, SALKIN & SHOCKETT, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Tarra

DeShields-Minnis, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Jack Sherman Wyatt appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C.§ 922(g) (1994).

On appeal, Wyatt challenges the sufficiency of the evidence used to

convict him and contends that the district court erred in denying his

motion pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. Finding no merit to either of

his assignments of error on appeal, we affirm Wyatt's conviction and

sentence.

Considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, as we must, we have no difficulty concluding that the evidence

was "sufficient for a rational trier of fact to have found the essential

elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." United States v.

Brewer, 1 F.3d 1430, 1437 (4th Cir. 1993); see also Glasser v. United

States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). Wyatt's contrary assertions go to the

credibility of the witnesses and the weight of the evidence, rather than

its sufficiency. See United States v. Saunders , 886 F.2d 56, 60 (4th

Cir. 1989). Moreover, we find no abuse of discretion on the part of

the district court in declining to order a new trial as a result of Wyatt's

allegations of juror misconduct. See United States v. Dorsey, 45 F.3d

809, 817 (4th Cir. 1995); Fed. R. Evid. 606(b); see also Tanner v.

United States, 483 U.S. 107, 121 (1987).

Accordingly, we affirm Wyatt's conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 22.1

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Subsidiary                                             Jurisdiction of
------------------                                             Incorporation
                                                               -------------
<S>                                                            <C>
1. GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.                                  Massachusetts

2. GZA Securities Corporation                                  Massachusetts

3. GZA Drilling, Inc. (a wholly owned                          Massachusetts
   subsidiary of GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.)

4. GZA Texas, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of GZA           Massachusetts
   GeoEnvironmental, Inc.)
</TABLE>




                                       43
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Chester Valley Bancorp Inc.:


We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements Nos.
33-71736  and  333-42099  on Form S-8 and No.  33-72210  on Form S-3 of  Chester
Valley  Bancorp  Inc.  of our  report  dated  July  24,  1998,  relating  to the
consolidated  statements of financial  condition of Chester  Valley Bancorp Inc.
and  subsidiaries  as of June 30, 1998 and 1997,  and the  related  consolidated
statements of operations,  changes in stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 1998, which appears in
the June 30, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Chester Valley Bancorp Inc.







Philadelphia, PA
September 25, 1998
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing Tax Credits L.P. V (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.











/s/Kenneth J. Cutillo


Kenneth J. Cutillo


Principal Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer


Arch Street VIII, Inc., as


Managing General Partner of


Boston Financial Qualified


Housing Tax Credits L.P. V








Date:            June 29, 2011











A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE> 83

The Company has five wholly owned subsidiaries: Property Transaction
Network, Preference America Mortgage Network and Monument Mortgage, Inc.,
Finet Corporation and FWC Shell Corporation, Inc. FWC Shell Corporation,
Inc. has three wholly owned subsidiaries: RPM Mortgage, Inc., RPM Fremont,
Inc. and RPM Affiliates, Inc. All subsidiaries are California corporations.
Finet Corporation and FWC Shell Corporation, Inc. and its subsidiaries are
inactive. As a result of the reverse acquisition of Monument Mortgage, Inc.
by Finet, Finet Correspondent, Inc., a wholly owned inactive subsidiary,
became Monument Mortgage, Inc.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                 SUBSIDIARIES OF
                         INTERNATIONAL WIRE GROUP, INC.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               JURISDICTION OF
                                                               INCORPORATION OR
SUSIDIARY                                                      ORGANIZATION
<S>                                                            <C>
Omega Wire, Inc...........................................     Delaware
OWI Corporation...........................................     New York
Wire Technologies, Inc....................................     Indiana
Camden Wire Company, Inc..................................     New York
IWG-Philippines, Inc......................................     Philippines
IWG International, Inc....................................     Barbados
International Wire Rome Operations, Inc...................     Delaware
Italtrecce-Societa Italiana Trecce & Affini S.r.l.........     Italy
International Wire Leasing, Inc...........................     Delaware
IWG Resources, Inc........................................     Nevada
International Wire SAS....................................     France
S.A. Tresse Metallique J. Forissier.......................     France
S.A. Cablerie E. Charbonnet...............................     France
S.A. Fressynet............................................     France
</TABLE>
TX116 - 011 - 29 CENRAP_PSAT_Tool_ENVIRON_Aug27_2007 .mdb

This type of file ( Microsoft Access Database ) cannot be posted to the docket. This file is available upon request. For questions or requesting copies of availa ble files and making arrangements, contact either Erik Snyder via email at Snyder.erik@epa.gov or phone 214 - 665 - 7305 or Michael Feldman via email at Feldman.michael@e pa.gov or phone 214 - 665 - 9793.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Ultitek, Ltd. (the “Registrant”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roman Price, the
      President and Chief Executive Officer, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Date:
                May 19, 2008
            /s/
                ROMAN PRICERoman
                PricePresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer) of Ultitek, Ltd.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (4.99 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### Hans A. Iverson, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.

■ *In Banc.*

Writ of error to Criminal Court of Record, Volusia county; Isaac A. Stewart, Judge.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant takes writ of error. Writ of error dismissed for failure to file briefs.
<PAGE>   1








                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       XXXXXXXXXX                      
                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                             XXXXX          XXXXX      XXXXX
                             XXXXX          XXXXX      XXXXX
                             XXXXX          XXXXX      XXXXX
                             XXXXX          XXXXX      XXXXX
                             XXXXX          XXXXX      XXXXX
                             XXXXX          XXXXX      XXXXX
                             XXXXX          XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                             XXXXX           XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                             XXXXX             XXXXXXXXXX



      XXXXXXXXXX          XXXXXXXXXX       XXXX         XXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXX      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     XXXXX       XXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
   XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XXXXXX     XXXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
   XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXXXX   XXXXXXX    XXXXX
   XXXXX               XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX    XXXXX
   XXXXX               XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXX
   XXXXX               XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXX
   XXXXX               XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX    XXXXX
   XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXX  XXX  XXXXX    XXXXX
   XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XXXXX   X   XXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXX      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     XXXXX       XXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
      XXXXXXXXXX          XXXXXXXXXX       XXXXX       XXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Macromolecular Structure and Function A Study Section, February 2, 2012, 8 a.m. to February 2, 2012, 7 p.m., George Washington University Inn, 824 New Hampshire Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 4, 2012, 77 FR 296.                

The meeting will be held February 2, 2012, from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. at The Westin Georgetown, 2350 M Street NW., Washington, DC 20037. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: January 5, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-461 Filed 1-11-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P