alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR10-95-001]


Enogex LLC; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on February 21, 2012, Enogex LLC submitted a 
revised baseline filing of their Statement of Operating Conditions to 
comply with an unpublished Delegated letter order issued on February 
10, 2012, as more fully described in the filing.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#591f1c0b1a16373530373c0a2c2929362b2d193f3c2b3a773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="30767562737f5e5c595e55634540405f424470565542531e575f46">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 5, 2012.

    Dated: February 22, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4768 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Amendment No. 11 to Lease and License Agreement, dated 01/19/2010



 Exhibit 10.26 

SHADY GROVE INNOVATION CENTER 

f/k/a 

MARYLAND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER 

LICENSE AGREEMENT 

AMENDMENT 11 
 This
addendum is made this 19 day of January, 2010, by and between MEDCO and Neogenix Oncology, Inc. (“Licensee”). 

WHEREAS, MEDCO and Licensee have entered into a License Agreement dated April 28, 2004; 

WHEREAS, Licensee currently occupies Labs #211, #222 and #226, and offices #260, #261, #262, #267 and #317 in the Shady Grove Innovation
Center f/k/a Maryland Technology Development Center in Montgomery County, Maryland (the “Original Premises”); 

WHEREAS Licensee wishes to expand and renew its office space within the Shady Grove Innovation Center and MEDCO is willing to provide for
such expansion and renewal based on the terms provided for below; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
and agreements stated herein, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Effective January 19, 2010, Licensee shall occupy office #318 (the “Expansion Premises”). 


 

	 	2.	The Monthly Payment, for the Expansion Premises, provided herein shall be as follows: 


 

			
	 From January 19, 2010 to January 31, 2010
	  	$207 (pro-rate)
	 From February 1, 2010 to April 30, 2011
	  	$535 + $15 furniture rental
charge = $550.00

  

	 	3.	The aggregate Monthly Payment, to include the Monthly Payment for the Original Premises and the Expansion Premises provided for herein shall be as follows:


  

				
	 From February 1, 2010 to April 30, 2010
	  	$	15,049
		
	 Renewal Term:
	  		
		
	 From May 1, 2010 to April 30, 2011
	  	$	15,049









	 	4.	Notwithstanding anything contained in the License Agreement to the contrary, effective May 1, 2010 (the “Effective Date”), the Term of the License
Agreement is hereby extended for a period of One (1) year, commencing on May 1, 2010 and ending on April 30, 2011. 

  

	 	5.	All other provisions of the original License Agreement shall apply to this Amendment 


This Amendment may be signed in counterparts. 
  

									
	FOR:	 	 Maryland Economic

Development Corporation
	 		 	FOR:	 	Neogenix Oncology, Inc.
					
	BY:	 	
 



	 		 	By:	 	
 




		 	 Scheer Partners, Inc.
 SGIC
Manager
	 		 		 	
					
	Date:	 	12/1/10	 		 	Date:	 	1.19.2010
					
	BY:	 	 /s/ Robert C. Brennan
	 		 		 	
		 	 Robert C. Brennan
 Executive
Director, MEDCO
	 		 		 	
					
	Date:	 	2/22/10
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0542

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

FRANK WEBB,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 29, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 22 2023

11/22/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0542
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PETER J. MILLIGAN PURSUANT TO SEC. 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter J.
Milligan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its combined subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|               |  |  |  |                                                  
|-------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|August 3, 2012 |  |  |  | /S/    PETER J. MILLIGAN                         
|(Date)         |  |  |  | Peter J. Milligan                                
|               |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

Officer Certification under 18 USC 1350

We, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of AXS-One Inc. (the "issuer"), do hereby certify that this Annual
Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

|                    |  | AXS-ONE INC.
|------------------- |  | ------------
|Date:March 31, 2003 |  | By:         
|                    |  | By:         

---

QuickLinks
Order filed April 21, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00260

- CV

____________ JONATHAN SALAZAR , Appellant

V. ALTA VISTA APTS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1058681



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed March 23, 2015

. To date, the filing fee of $19 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P

. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $1 9 5.00 to the

c lerk of this court on or before May 6, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellantfails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be

dismissed.

PER CURIAM
---

EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Santa Fe Gold Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Pierce Carson,
President, Chief Executive Officer AND Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                                                                             
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
      Report.

|Date: October 15,2007 |     |                                           
|--------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                      | By: | /s/ W. Pierce Carson                      
|                      |     | W. Pierce Carson                          
|                      |     | President, Chief Executive
      Officer, 
|                      |     | Director and Chief Financial
      Officer

---
May 10, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

839 E. 19TH STREET, L.P., Appellant

NO. 14-11-00349-CV V.

SCOTT FRIEDSON D/B/A NATIONAL INCOME PROPERTY, L.L.C., Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Scott Friedson d/b/a 

National Income Property, L.L.C., signed January 19, 2011, was heard on the transcript 

of the record. We have inspected the record and find the evidence is legally insufficient 

to support the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below 

REVERSED and RENDER judgment that appellee, Scott Friedson d/b/a National 

Income Property, L.L.C., take nothing on his claims against appellant, 839th E. 19th 

Street, L.P.

We order appellee, Scott Friedson d/b/a National Income Property, L.L.C., to pay 

all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for 

observance.
March 29, 2011

Darrell Mike

Chairperson29 Palms Tribal Council

46-200 Harrison Place

Coachella, CA 92236

Dear Chairperson Mike:

I am writing to provide you with guidance for designating areas under the recently

revised primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2).

Tribes are not required to submit designation recommendations for new or revised air quality

standards, but I am inviting you to participate in the designations process by submitting a

designation recommendation for your tribal lands by June 3, 2011.

On June 3, 2010, EPA added a new primary (health-based) NAAQS for SO2in order to

provide increased protection of public health from SO2pollution. The new standard of 75 parts

per billion (ppb), is attained when the 3-year average of the 99th percentile of 1-hour daily

maximum concentrations does not exceed 75 ppb. No changes were made to the existing 3-hour

secondary standard. In this action EPA is only designating for the new, 1-hour 75 ppb SO2standard.

Establishing area designations is a key step in the process of providing the health

protection intended by the Clean Air Act (CAA). Within two years of promulgation of a new or

revised NAAQS, section 107(d)(1)(A) of the CAA requires EPA to list and designate all areas in

the country, including Indian country, as either:

Attainment—areas that meet the standard;Nonattainment—areas that either do not meet the standard, or are contributing to a nearby

area that does not meet the standard; or

Unclassifiable—areas where there is insufficient information to make a determination.

These designations are based on current air quality information, recommendations from

State Governors and Tribal Leaders, and other relevant information. We request and encourage

you to submit a designation recommendation for consideration in this process. If you do choose

to participate, we ask that you provide your recommendation to EPA by June 3, 2011.

Printed on Recycled Paper
calendar years of certified, quality-assured monitoring data available, state and tribalrecommendations, and any other relevant information that is provided, including refined air

quality dispersion modeling, as discussed further in the attached guidance document.

As the process moves forward, we will keep you and your staff informed of any

additional guidance or other support activities. Should you have any questions regarding this

matter, please do not hesitate to contact me or Colleen McKaughan, Air Division AssociateDirector, at (520) 498-0118.

Sincerely,

Jared Blumenfeld

Enclosure

cc: Marshall Cheung, Tribal EPA Coordinator
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.18 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, DLA Aviation - Ogden, Employee Spotlight

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
VI 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 136 

For the relief of Ziad Mohamed Shaban Khweis, Heyam Ziad Khweis, and 

Juman Ziad Khweis. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. BINGAMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Ziad Mohamed Shaban Khweis, Heyam 

Ziad Khweis, and Juman Ziad Khweis. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Ziad Mohamed Shaban Khweis, Heyam 

7 Ziad Khweis, and Juman Ziad Khweis shall be considered 

8 to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for 

9 permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of 

10 this Act upon payment of the required visa fees. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 136 IS

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

2 Upon the granting of lawful permanent residence sta3 tus to Ziad Mohamed Shaban Khweis, Heyam Ziad 

4 Khweis, and Juman Ziad Khweis, the Secretary of State 

5 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 3, for the 

6 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

7 immigrant visas available to natives of the country of the 

8 aliens’ birth under section 202(e) or 203(a) of the Immi9 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e) and 

10 1153(a)). 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

10 a.m., Thursday, March 1, 2012.

# PLACE:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey Avenue NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open session:                         *Secretary of Labor*                         v.                         *Black Beauty Coal Co.,*                         Docket No. LAKE 2008-477. (Issues include whether the judge erred in concluding that adequate berms had not been provided and that the violations were “significant and substantial” and due to unwarrantable failures to comply.)                    

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Emogene Johnson,

Administrative Assistant.

[FR Doc. 2012-4487 Filed 2-22-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7646

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee,

v. SCOTT LEWIS RENDELMAN, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07- cr-00331-RWT-1; 8:08-cv-01832-RWT)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 22, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott Lewis Rendelman, Appellant Pro Se. Stacy Dawson Belf, James Marton Trusty, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Scott Lewis Rendelman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as premature. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rendelman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED