## Instructions **for Developing Industry**

**- specific**  **Impacts for Heat**  **Exchange Systems**

**Step 1** . Revise the labor rates for the specific industry, if desired. The heat exchange system impacts model includes labor rates manufacturing industry sector (2

- digit NAICS code 31 to 33) in the “labor rates” sheet within the impacts model. Industry Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (U.S. DOL, 2010) for specific NAICS codes. For the NAICS code associated with the specific the specified SOC Code Numbers specified in the model can be found and entered into the spreadsheet. The new values should b sheet “labor rates”). If desired, the fringe benefits loading factor and overhead and profit rate can be adjusted in the cor

**Step 2** . Determine the number of heat exchange systems per facility for which to estimate facility costs (per heat exchange system) in the “Cost by monitoring method” sheet. As discussed previously, the cost per heat exchange system is a function of the nu need to be monitored at a specific facility. The number of heat exchange systems should be entered in the yellow sheet. There are five monitoring frequencies evaluated in the macro: four periodic frequencies specified in the green highl monitoring method” sheet and a continuous monitoring option. If desired, the periodic monitoring frequencies in Cells R9 to monitoring frequencies than those pre

- loaded in the spreadsheet. In general, no other edits should be made to this sheet. Run “Generate Control_Options Costs” button to automatically calculate an array of costs for different monitoring frequencies and “Control_Options” sheet.

**Step 3 (Optional)** . Review the table starting at Cell B9 in the “Control_Options” sheet. After running the “Generate Control_Options Costs” m control options (monitoring frequencies) will be generated and stored in this table. The “Control_Options” sheet also houses the “Control_Options” sheet are used in the “Cost by HEsize” sheet for projecting the impacts per model heat exchange system. subsequent rows in the “Control_Options” sheet to store costs for previously evaluated sets of runs. One advantage of using several cost tables are already developed and stored in this sheet; however, with the macro, these costs can be easily and qu
unnecessary.

**Step 4** . The next step in the process is to evaluate the specific options in the “Cost by HEsize” sheet. There is a drop down sele frequency in Row 10, and yellow

- highlighted input selections for the leak definition (in terms of water concentration), delay of factor (“Reduct_Factor”), fraction of leaks that below the delay

- of

- repair threshold that are delayed (“Fr_Delayed”), and the VO **Step 4** . The next step in the process is to evaluate the specific options in the “Cost by HEsize” sheet. There is a drop down sele frequency in Row 10, and yellow

- highlighted input selections for the leak definition (in terms of water concentration), delay of factor (“Reduct_Factor”), fraction of leaks that below the delay

- of

- repair threshold that are delayed (“Fr_Delayed”), and the VO are summarized on a per heat exchange system level for four different model heat exchange system water circulation sizes: 5, 110,000 gpm. The macro “Generate Impact Results Summary” allows the evaluation of using modified El Paso monitoring at all f “Control_Options” table. These results will be in the placed in the “Results_temp” sheet. The macro will automatically high copied into one of the three “Results_#” sheets (where # = 1, 2, or 3). The “Results_#” sheets are used to save the specific selected range from the “Results_temp” sheet would be copied to Cell B1, I1, P1, or W1 in one of the “Results_#” sheets as ap

**Step 5** . Repeat Step 4 as needed for different model run evaluations for a given model plant ( i.e. , a given number of heat exchange systems at a facility). Each “Results_#” sheet is designed to hold results for 4 different model runs. The model runs in a given sheet can be used to evaluate the ef different model assumptions ( e.g. , different leak reduction factors or differences in fraction of leaks for which delay of repair is used). Graphs are provid results of the different model runs for each of the four model heat exchange systems (see Rows 77

- 98). It is anticipated that t the yellow highlighted in Cells D11:G13 of the “Cost by HEsize” sheet. The results output by the macro will include these in systems per facility) for documentation of the run results. The results summary does not store the initial leak distribution the “Cost by HEsize” sheet). If the initial leak distribution is varied across these runs, the leak distribution should also

**Step 6** . Repeat Steps 2 through 5 as needed for different model plants ( i.e. , to develop impacts for different numbers of heat exchange systems per facility). It is likely that the impacts for a specific industry may entail developing costs for a variety of model plant sizes or complexities, whic different numbers of heat exchange systems. For example, evaluation of three different model facilities may be desired for d facility with one heat exchange system to be monitored; a moderately complex facility with two heat exchange systems to be mo exchange systems to be monitored. Steps 2 through 5 would have to be repeated of each of these model plants. The three “Res house impact results for three different model plants, with each sheet representing the results for a given model plant. How sheet to house the results for a specific set of model inputs (leak definition and repair threshold), and use the four column If this second option is used, the graphs included in the “Results_#” sheets at Row 80 will be meaningless, but it may be eas

### If this second option is used, the graphs included in the “Results_#” sheets at Row 80 will be meaningless, but it may be eas

“NW_Impacts” sheet for calculation of nationwide impacts.

**Step 7** . Assign a nationwide number of heat exchange systems that can be represented by each model heat exchange system / model pla emission reductions presented are per heat exchange system. By multiplying the costs and emission reductions by the number o impacts are developed for the source category. The “NW_Impacts” sheet provides a means to calculate the number of heat excha heat exchange system / model plant combination for up to four model plants. The inputs needed for these calculations are the the source category and the relative distribution of heat exchange systems by size and model plant. Note: the number of the each model plant combination is rounded to whole numbers for the impact calculations, so there may be a slight difference in Cell F32 and the total number of heat exchange system input in Cell G5 due to rounding.

**Step 8** . Identify the specific control options for evaluation to calculate the nationwide impacts and enter those results in the “N previously, if a single sheet contains output for the different model plants, it may expedite the manual process of transferr (but the graphs in the “Results_#” sheets will be of little value). Once the impacts for the selected control options are en the sheet will automatically calculate the nationwide impacts in the final results table.

If additional edits to the costing assumptions are deemed necessary (i.e., hours required for training, reporting, or other e the “Generate Control_Option Costs” macro. The password to unlock the "Cost by monitoring method" and "Cost_by_HEsize" sheets is: "epa".

### . Revise the labor rates for the specific industry, if desired. The heat exchange system impacts model includes labor rates (i n May 2009 dollars) for general digit NAICS code 31 to 33) in the “labor rates” sheet within the impacts model. Industry

- speci fic labor rates are available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (U.S. DOL, 2010) for specific NAICS codes. For the NAICS code associated with the specific sou rce category, the mean hourly labor rates for the specified SOC Code Numbers specified in the model can be found and entered into the spreadsheet. The new values should b e e ntered in shaded cells (Cells I3 to I7 of sheet “labor rates”). If desired, the fringe benefits loading factor and overhead and profit rate can be adjusted in the cor res ponding cells in columns C and D.

. Determine the number of heat exchange systems per facility for which to estimate facility costs (per heat exchange system)

. The monitoring costs are calculated in the “Cost by monitoring method” sheet. As discussed previously, the cost per heat exchange system is a function of the nu mbe r of heat exchange systems that will need to be monitored at a specific facility. The number of heat exchange systems should be entered in the yellow

- highlighted Ce ll I9 in the “Cost by monitoring method” sheet. There are five monitoring frequencies evaluated in the macro: four periodic frequencies specified in the green highl igh ted cells (Cells R9 to R12) in the “Cost by monitoring method” sheet and a continuous monitoring option. If desired, the periodic monitoring frequencies in Cells R9 to R12 can be adjusted to evaluate different loaded in the spreadsheet. In general, no other edits should be made to this sheet. Run the macro provided by pushing the “Generate Control_Options Costs” button to automatically calculate an array of costs for different monitoring frequencies and st ore the results for further use in the

. Review the table starting at Cell B9 in the “Control_Options” sheet. After running the “Generate Control_Options Costs” m acr o, costs for the various control options (monitoring frequencies) will be generated and stored in this table. The “Control_Options” sheet also houses th e repair cost estimates. The top 30 rows of the “Control_Options” sheet are used in the “Cost by HEsize” sheet for projecting the impacts per model heat exchange system. I f you choose to do so, you can use subsequent rows in the “Control_Options” sheet to store costs for previously evaluated sets of runs. One advantage of using the general manufacturing labor rates is that several cost tables are already developed and stored in this sheet; however, with the macro, these costs can be easily and qu ick ly updated, so most users will find this step

. The next step in the process is to evaluate the specific options in the “Cost by HEsize” sheet. There is a drop down sele cti on for the monitoring method and highlighted input selections for the leak definition (in terms of water concentration), delay of leak threshold concentration, leak reduction repair threshold that are delayed (“Fr_Delayed”), and the VO C credit. The results of the model analysis . The next step in the process is to evaluate the specific options in the “Cost by HEsize” sheet. There is a drop down sele cti on for the monitoring method and highlighted input selections for the leak definition (in terms of water concentration), delay of leak threshold concentration, leak reduction repair threshold that are delayed (“Fr_Delayed”), and the VO C credit. The results of the model analysis are summarized on a per heat exchange system level for four different model heat exchange system water circulation sizes: 5, 000 gpm; 15,000 gpm; 40,000 gpm; and 110,000 gpm. The macro “Generate Impact Results Summary” allows the evaluation of using modified El Paso monitoring at all f req uencies included in the current “Control_Options” table. These results will be in the placed in the “Results_temp” sheet. The macro will automatically high lig ht the results range which can then be copied into one of the three “Results_#” sheets (where # = 1, 2, or 3). The “Results_#” sheets are used to save the specific mo del run results for further analysis. The selected range from the “Results_temp” sheet would be copied to Cell B1, I1, P1, or W1 in one of the “Results_#” sheets as ap pro priate.

, a given number of heat exchange systems at a facility). Each “Results_#” sheet is designed to hold results for 4 different model runs. The model runs in a given sheet can be used to evaluate the ef fec t of different leak definitions or the impact of , different leak reduction factors or differences in fraction of leaks for which delay of repair is used). Graphs are provid ed to illustrate the 98). It is anticipated that t he results for any given sheet will only alter the yellow highlighted in Cells D11:G13 of the “Cost by HEsize” sheet. The results output by the macro will include these in put s (along with the number of heat exchange systems per facility) for documentation of the run results. The results summary does not store the initial leak distribution ( i.e. , the yellow highlighted in Cells M11:M16 of the “Cost by HEsize” sheet). If the initial leak distribution is varied across these runs, the leak distribution should also be saved to document these inputs as well.

, to develop impacts for different numbers of heat exchange systems per facility). It is likely that the impacts for a specific industry may entail developing costs for a variety of model plant sizes or complexities, whic h m ay require costs to be evaluated for several different numbers of heat exchange systems. For example, evaluation of three different model facilities may be desired for d iff erent facility complexities: a simple model facility with one heat exchange system to be monitored; a moderately complex facility with two heat exchange systems to be mo nit ored; a complex facility with four heat exchange systems to be monitored. Steps 2 through 5 would have to be repeated of each of these model plants. The three “Res ult s_#” sheets were originally designed to house impact results for three different model plants, with each sheet representing the results for a given model plant. How eve r, you could alternatively use one results sheet to house the results for a specific set of model inputs (leak definition and repair threshold), and use the four column s t o house the results for different model plants. If this second option is used, the graphs included in the “Results_#” sheets at Row 80 will be meaningless, but it may be eas ier to quickly copy the selected results to the

### If this second option is used, the graphs included in the “Results_#” sheets at Row 80 will be meaningless, but it may be eas ier to quickly copy the selected results to the

. Assign a nationwide number of heat exchange systems that can be represented by each model heat exchange system / model pla nt combination. The costs and emission reductions presented are per heat exchange system. By multiplying the costs and emission reductions by the number o f h eat exchange systems, nationwide impacts are developed for the source category. The “NW_Impacts” sheet provides a means to calculate the number of heat excha nge systems represented by each model heat exchange system / model plant combination for up to four model plants. The inputs needed for these calculations are the to tal number of heat exchange systems in the source category and the relative distribution of heat exchange systems by size and model plant. Note: the number of the nu mber of heat exchange systems used for each model plant combination is rounded to whole numbers for the impact calculations, so there may be a slight difference in the number of heat exchangers calculated in

. Identify the specific control options for evaluation to calculate the nationwide impacts and enter those results in the “N W_I mpacts” sheet (see Cell J32). As noted previously, if a single sheet contains output for the different model plants, it may expedite the manual process of transferr ing selected results to the “NW_Impacts” sheet (but the graphs in the “Results_#” sheets will be of little value). Once the impacts for the selected control options are en ter ed (or copied) into the “NW_Impacts” sheet,

If additional edits to the costing assumptions are deemed necessary (i.e., hours required for training, reporting, or other e lem ents), these should be made prior to running unlock the "Cost by monitoring method" and "Cost_by_HEsize" sheets is: "epa".

## Nationw **ide Impact Summary Sheet**  **Input Parameters Section Enter appropriate values in the yellow highlighted cells** 

**1) Number of Impacted Heat Exchange Systems Nationwide:**  100

**2) Distribution of Model Heat Exchange System by Size** 

Wa ter Flow Rate (gpm) Fraction HE

sy stems of this size 5,000 0.2000 15,000 0.3000 40,000 0.3000 100,000 0.2000

Sum Check: 1.0000 (value should equal 1.0000)

**3) Distribution of Model Plants** 

Model Plant Number Fraction

facilities represented by this model plant No. of HE

sy stems for this model plant Intermed.

Calc. for Wt . Factor Wt d.

Average HE Sy stems by Model Plant 1 0.4500 1 0.45 0.2195 2 0.3000 2 0.60 0.2927 3 0.2500 4 1.00 0.4878 4

- 6

- - 2.05 Sum Check: 1.0000 (value should equal 1.0000)

**3) Number of HE Systems for each of Model HE Size and Model Plant** 

Wa ter Flow Rate (gpm) 1 2 3 4 5,000 4 6 10 0 15,000 7 9 15 0 40,000 7 9 15 0 100,000 4 6 10 0

Total Number of HES (rounded) 102 Model Plant Num ber

### Output Summary **Section**

**Final results table**

**Control Option**  **Option Description TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C**

**w/recovery credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)**
BL Baseline 1 80 ppbw, m onthly 836,282 $ 549,253

$ 43,593

$ 1,011 43 $ 2 40 ppbw, quarterly 323,832 $ 368,813

$ (144,314)

$ 1,026 (141) $ 3 40 ppbw, m onthly 836,282 $ 589,765

$ 55,142

$ 1,069 52 $ 4 40 ppbw, continuous 2,583,407 $ 1,663,430

$ 1,118,073

$ 1,091 1,025 $

**Copy the results for specific options in the designated areas below:**

**Control Option 1 Results Model Plant 1** 

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C**

**w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 16,895 $ 7,738 $ 7,074

$ 1.33 5,323 $ 15,000 16,895

$ 7,738 $ 5,745

$ 3.99 1,441 $ 40,000 16,895

$ 7,738 $ 2,423

$ 10.63 228 $ 100,000 16,895

$ 7,738 $ (5,551)

$ 26.58 (209) $

**Control Option 2 Results Model Plant 1** 

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C**

**w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 3,045 $ 4,853 $ 4,179

$ 1.35 3,099 $15,000 3,045 $ 4,853 $ 2,831

$ 4.05 700 $ 40,000 3,045

$ 4,853 $ (541)

$ 10.79 (50) $ 100,000 3,045

$ 4,853 $ (8,632)

$ 26.97 (320) $

**Control Option 3 Results Model Plant 1** 

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C**

**w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 16,895 $ 8,136 $ 7,433

$ 1.41 5,290 $ 15,000 16,895

$ 8,136 $ 6,028

$ 4.22 1,430 $ 40,000 16,895

$ 8,136 $ 2,515

$ 11.24 224 $ 100,000 16,895

$ 8,136 $ (5,915)

$ 28.10 (210) $

**Control Option 4 Results Model Plant 1** 

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C**

**w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 26,895 $ 16,923 $ 16,206

$ 1.43 11,307 $ 15,000 26,895

$ 16,923 $ 14,773

$ 4.30 3,436 $ 40,000 26,895

$ 16,923 $ 11,190

$ 11.47 976 $ 100,000 26,895

$ 16,923 $ 2,590

$ 28.67 90 $

**Intermediate Calculations - Do Not A lter**  **Option 1**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C**

**w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 160,499 $ 106,755 $ 93,466

$ 27 3,517 $ 15,000 257,642

$ 167,871 $ 106,076

$ 124 858 $ 40,000 257,642

$ 167,871 $ 3,083

$ 330 9 $ 100,000 160,499

$ 106,755 $ (159,032)

$ 532 (299) $ Totals 836,282

$ 549,253 $ 43,593

$ 1,011 43 $

**Option 2 Model** 

**Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C**  **($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C** 

**w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 63,549 $ 71,821 $ 58,336

$ 27 2,163 $ 15,000 98,367

$ 112,585 $ 49,877

$ 125 398 $ 40,000 98,367

$ 112,585 $ (54,636)

$ 334 (163) $ 100,000 63,549

$ 71,821 $ (197,891)

$ 539 (367) $ Totals 323,832

$ 368,813 $ (144,314)

$ 1,026 (141) $

**Option 3**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C**

**w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 160,499 $ 114,699 $ 100,648

$ 28 3,582 $ 15,000 257,642

$ 180,184 $ 114,849

$ 131 879 $ 40,000 257,642

$ 180,184 $ 5,957

$ 348 17 $ 100,000 160,499

$ 114,699 $ (166,312)

$ 562 (296) $ Totals 836,282

$ 589,765 $ 55,142

$ 1,069 52 $

**Option 4**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C**

**w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 505,924 $ 325,917 $ 311,584

$ 29 10,870 $ 15,000 785,780

$ 505,798 $ 439,151

$ 133 3,295 $ 40,000 785,780

$ 505,798 $ 328,074

$ 355 923 $ 100,000 505,924

$ 325,917 $ 39,264

$ 573 68 $ Totals 2,583,407

$ 1,663,430 $ 1,118,073

$ 1,091 1,025 $**Incremental**

**Cost-Effect ($/tons)** 

43 $ (12,582) $ 4,639 $ 49,515 $

**Model Plant 2 Model Plant 3** 

**Model Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C**  **($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C** 

**w/recovery credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost**

**Effect ($/tons)**  **Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  5 8,447 $ 5,452

$ 4,788

$ 1.33 3,603 $ 5,000 4,224 $ 15,000 8,447

$ 5,452

$ 3,459

$ 3.99 868 $ 15,000 4,224 $ 40,000 8,447

$ 5,452

$ 136

$ 10.63 13 $ 40,000 4,224 $ 100,000 8,447

$ 5,452

$ (7,837)

$ 26.58 (295) $ 100,000 4,224 $

**Model Plant 2 Model Plant 3** 

**Model Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C**  **($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C** 

**w/recovery credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost**

**Effect ($/tons)**  **Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  5 1,522 $ 3,512

$ 2,838

$ 1.35 2,104 $ 5,000 4,224 $15,000 1,522 $ 3,512

$ 1,489

$ 4.05 368 $ 15,000 4,224 $ 40,000 1,522

$ 3,512

$ (1,882)

$ 10.79 (174) $ 40,000 4,224 $ 100,000 1,522

$ 3,512

$ (9,973)

$ 26.97 (370) $ 100,000 4,224 $

**Model Plant 2 Model Plant 3** 

**Model Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C**  **($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C** 

**w/recovery credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost**

**Effect ($/tons)**  **Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  5 8,447 $ 5,849

$ 5,147

$ 1.41 3,663 $ 5,000 4,224 $ 15,000 8,447

$ 5,849

$ 3,742

$ 4.22 888 $ 15,000 4,224 $ 40,000 8,447

$ 5,849

$ 229

$ 11.24 20 $ 40,000 4,224 $ 100,000 8,447

$ 5,849

$ (8,201)

$ 28.10 (292) $ 100,000 4,224 $

**Model Plant 2 Model Plant 3** 

**Model Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C**  **($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C** 

**w/recovery credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost**

**Effect ($/tons)**  **Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  5 25,372 $ 16,326

$ 15,609

$ 1.43 10,891 $ 5,000 24,611 $ 15,000 25,372

$ 16,326

$ 14,176

$ 4.30 3,297 $ 15,000 24,611 $ 40,000 25,372

$ 16,326

$ 10,593

$ 11.47 924 $ 40,000 24,611 $ 100,000 25,372

$ 16,326

$ 1,993

$ 28.67 70 $ 100,000 24,611 $**Model Plant 4**

**Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C**

**w/recovery credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost**

**Effect ($/tons)**  **Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C w/recover**  **y credits ($/yr)**  4,309 $ 3,644

$ 1.33 2,742 $ 5,000 4,224 $ 4,309

$ 3,644

$ 4,309 $ 2,315

$ 3.99 581 $ 15,000 4,224 $ 4,309

$ 2,315

$ 4,309 $ (1,007)

$ 10.63 (95) $ 40,000 4,224 $ 4,309

$ (1,007)

$ 4,309 $ (8,980)

$ 26.58 (338) $ 100,000 4,224 $ 4,309

$ (8,980)

$

**Model Plant 4**

**Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C**

**w/recovery credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost**

**Effect ($/tons)**  **Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C w/recover**  **y credits ($/yr)**  3,134 $ 2,459

$ 1.35 1,824 $ 5,000 4,224 $ 3,134

$ 2,459

$3,134

$ 1,111

$ 4.05 275 $ 15,000 4,224 $ 3,134

$ 1,111

$ 3,134 $ (2,261)

$ 10.79 (210) $ 40,000 4,224 $ 3,134

$ (2,261)

$ 3,134 $ (10,352)

$ 26.97 (384) $ 100,000 4,224 $ 3,134

$ (10,352)

$

**Model Plant 4**

**Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C**

**w/recovery credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost**

**Effect ($/tons)**  **Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C w/recover**  **y credits ($/yr)**  4,706 $ 4,004

$ 1.41 2,849 $ 5,000 4,224 $ 4,706

$ 4,004

$ 4,706 $ 2,598

$ 4.22 616 $ 15,000 4,224 $ 4,706

$ 2,598

$ 4,706 $ (914)

$ 11.24 (81) $ 40,000 4,224 $ 4,706

$ (914)

$ 4,706 $ (9,344)

$ 28.10 (333) $ 100,000 4,224 $ 4,706

$ (9,344)

$

**Model Plant 4**

**Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C**

**w/recovery credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost**

**Effect ($/tons)**  **Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C w/recover**  **y credits ($/yr)**  16,027 $ 15,310

$ 1.43 10,682 $ 5,000 24,611 $ 16,027

$ 15,310

$ 16,027 $ 13,877

$ 4.30 3,227 $ 15,000 24,611 $ 16,027

$ 13,877

$ 16,027 $ 10,294

$ 11.47 898 $ 40,000 24,611 $ 16,027

$ 10,294

$ 16,027 $ 1,694

$ 28.67 59 $ 100,000 24,611 $ 16,027

$ 1,694

$**VOC**

**Emiss Reductio** 

**n (tons/yr)**  **Cost**

**Effect ($/tons)**  1.33 2,742 $ 3.99 581 $ 10.63 (95) $ 26.58 (338) $

**VOC Emiss**  **Reductio**

**n (tons/yr)**  **Cost**

**Effect ($/tons)**  1.35 1,824 $4.05 275 $ 10.79 (210) $ 26.97 (384) $

**VOC Emiss**  **Reductio**

**n (tons/yr)**  **Cost**

**Effect ($/tons)**  1.41 2,849 $ 4.22 616 $ 11.24 (81) $ 28.10 (333) $

**VOC Emiss**  **Reductio**

**n (tons/yr)**  **Cost**

**Effect ($/tons)**  1.43 10,682 $ 4.30 3,227 $ 11.47 898 $ 28.67 59 $A B C D E May -09 NAICS--> 31 - 33

**Labor Class Labor Rate from** 

**the Bureau of Labor Statistics**  **Fringe Benefit Loading**  **Factor Overhead and** 

**profit rate Loaded wage rate** 

**(B x C x D) SOC**  **Code Number**  **Me an** 

**Hourly Wage** 
Professional specialty and Technical 39.53 1.5 1.4 83.01 Environm ental Engr. 17-2041 39.53

Executive, adm inistrative and

ma nagerial 57.80 1.5 1.4 121.38 Engr. Manager 11-9041 57.80

Adm inistrative support, including clerical 17.31 1.5 1.4 36.35
Adm in 43-0000 17.31

Installation, Maintenance, and Repair 22.08 1.5 1.4 46.37 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair 49-0000 22.08

Plant and Sy stem Operators, All 22.72 1.5 1.4 47.71 Plant and Sy stem Operators, All 51-8099 22.72

May 2009 Labor rates (accessed in December 2010). http://stats.bls.gov/oes/oes_dl.htm total cost/tech hr 92.72

## Cost Comparison of Direct Water Sampling w **ith Texas El Paso Stripping Column Sampling**

**Facility/General Input Variables** Number of Affected Heat Exchange Sy stems at the facility Number of Required Monitoring Events per Year per HE Sy stem (Enter 1 for Annual; 4 for Quarterly ; 12 for Monthly ; 52 for W eekly ; 365 for Daily )

**Summary Costs for Current Modeling Run - Costs per HE System**

**Monitoring Method Capital and 1x**  **Costs A**  **nnualized**

**Capital Cost An**  **nual**

**Operating Costs**  Wa ter sampling TOC in/out 761 $ 186

$ 28,135

$ Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 761 $ 186

$ 21,174

$ El Paso - contracted out 761 $ 186

$ 19,034

$ El Paso - buy ing sy stem 4,224 $ 1,030

$ 10,744

$ El Paso - continuous 24,611 $ 6,002

$ 9,230

$

**Cost Estimate for Direct TOC Water Sampling (Inlet/Outlet) per Heat Exchange System**

Planning/QA/Training 1 3,045 $ TCI per Cooling tower 761 $ This sheet evaluates the costs of direct cooling water sampling (determining a leak by difference from inlet and outlet) and the costs associated with the Texas El Paso stripping column method. It does not account for costs of leak repair; it assumes that these costs would be similar assuming the leak definition is effectively the same. Full speciation analysis for identifying the location of a leak are similar for water and air sampling. Similarly, it assumes recordkeeping and reporting costs would be similar regardless of the sampling method, being more a functionof frequency. Note: It would be difficult for the direct water sampling method to achieve the same effective leak definitions as the Texas El Paso method; however, the purpose of this sheet is to illustrate the relative monitoing costs per affected heat exchange system and not the impact of the leak definition.

Labor to collect samples 2 3,722 $ Analy tical Costs 3 23,383 $ Repair Costs 4

- $ Recordkeeping 5 620 $ Reporting 6 410 $ AOC (per HE sy stem) 28,135 $ TAC (per HE sy stem) 28,321 $

**Cost Estimate for Direct Water Sampling (Outlet only) per Heat Exchange System**

Planning/QA/Training 1 3,045 $ TCI per Cooling tower 761 $

Labor to collect samples 12 2,481 $ Analy tical Costs 13 17,663 $

Repair Costs 4

- $ Recordkeeping 5 620 $ Reporting 6 410 $ AOC (per HE sy stem) 21,174 $ TAC (per HE sy stem) 21,360 $1 Planning costs/initial evaluation and QA plan= 32 hrs engineer, 2 hrs management, 4 Admin.

2 Time to take 3 inlet and 3 outlet samples; prepare for shipping 3 Costs for six TOC analy sis (on-line price lists ranged from $50-75/sample; used $60/sample + $30 to include sample shipping and handling Add 0.5 hours tech and admin labor/event for sample shipping and results review.

4 5 Assume recordkeeping 0.25 hrs/event for operators 6 Assume reporting is 2 technical hr/report, semi-annual report; adds 10% Management and 20% Admin independent of the number of CT's

12 Time to take 1 sample; prepare for shipping 13 Costs for EPA Method 601/602 = $250/sample. Add $30 express shipping Add 0.5 hours tech and admin labor/event for sample shipping and results review. Not included, evaluating m onitoring only

## Cost Comparison of Direct Water Sampling w **ith Texas El Paso Stripping Column Sampling**

**Input Value** No_HE 4 No_Events 52

**Total An**  **nualized Costs**  **No. HE No.**  **Events** 28,321 $ 4 52 21,360 $ 4 52 19,219 $ 4 52 11,775 $ 4 52 15,233 $ 4 8760

**Hrs** Total Technical Mgm t Adm in/Support Repair Operators 38 32 2 4 0 0 This sheet evaluates the costs of direct cooling water sampling (determining a leak by difference from inlet and outlet) and the costs associated with the Texas El Paso stripping column method. It does not account for costs of leak repair; it assumes that these costs would be similar assuming the leak definition is effectively the same. Full speciation analysis for identifying the location of a leak are similar for water and air sampling. Similarly, it assumes recordkeeping and reporting costs would be similar regardless of the sampling method, being more a functionof frequency. Note: It would be difficult for the direct water sampling method to achieve the same effective leak definitions as the Texas El Paso method; however, the purpose of this sheet is to illustrate the relative monitoing costs per affected heat exchange system and not the impact of the leak definition.

78 0 0 0 0 78 52 26 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 13.0 5.2 4 0.4 0.8 0 0

**Hrs** Total Technical Mgm t Adm in/Support Repair Operators 38 32 2 4 0 0

52 0 0 0 0 52 52 26 0 26 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 13.0 5.2 4 0.4 0.8 0 01.5 hrs/event Costs for six TOC analy sis (on-line price lists ranged from $50-75/sample; used $60/sample + $30 to include sample shipping and handling $390 per sample 0.5 hrs/event

0.25 hrs/event Assume reporting is 2 technical hr/report, semi-annual report; adds 10% Management and 20% Admin 2 hrs/y r

1 hrs/event $280 per sample 0.5 hrs/event El Paso - specific costs... 7

8 9

10

11 14 15Macro Fields - Alter only green cells Frequency

Options Current_FreqOpt 1 1 tim es/y r 4 2 4 tim es/y r 3 12 tim es/y r 4 52 tim es/y r

52 Eqn copy

if needed to reset No_Events cell

**Cost Estimate for El Paso Sampling per Heat Exchange System, hiring tester Hrs**  Total Technical Mgm t Adm in/Support Repair Planning 1 3,045 $ 38 32 2 4 0 Costs for Stripping Column and equipment 9 0 0 0 0 0 TCI per Cooling tower 761 $ This sheet evaluates the costs of direct cooling water sampling (determining a leak by difference from inlet and outlet) and the costs associated with the Texas El Paso stripping column method. It does not account for costs of leak repair; it assumes that these costs would be similar assuming the leak definition is effectively the same. Full speciation analysis for identifying the location of a leak are similar for water and air sampling. Similarly, it assumes recordkeeping and reporting costs would be similar regardless of the sampling method, being more a functionof frequency. Note: It would be difficult for the direct water sampling method to achieve the same effective leak definitions as the Texas El Paso method; however, the purpose of this sheet is to illustrate the relative monitoing costs per affected heat exchange system and not the impact of the leak definition.

TCI per Cooling tower 761 $

Monitoring - El Paso ; All HE 10 74,413 $ 26 26 0 0 0 Repair Costs 4

- $ 0 0 0 0 0 Recordkeeping 11 21 $ 0 0.25 0 0 0 Reporting 6 410 $ 5.2 4 0.4 0.8 0 Training 8

- $ 0 0 0 0 0 AOC (per HE sy stem) 19,034 $ TAC (per HE sy stem) 19,219 $

**Cost Estimate for El Paso Sampling per Heat Exchange System when purchasing equipment Hrs**  Total Technical Mgm t Adm in/Support Repair Planning 1 3,045 $ 38 32 2 4 0 Costs for Stripping Column and equipment 9 13,850 $ 0 0 0 0 0 TCI per Cooling tower 4,224 $

Monitoring - El Paso stripping column for total strippable VOC 7 9,601 $ 182 26 0 0 0

Repair Costs 4

- $ 0 0 0 0 0 Recordkeeping 5 620 $ 13 0 0 0 0 Reporting 6 410 $ 5.2 4 0.4 0.8 0 Training 8 452 $ 8 2 0 0 0 AOC (per HE sy stem) 10,744 $TAC (per HE sy stem) 11,775 $

**Cost Estimate for El Paso Sampling per Heat Exchange System when purchasing equipment continuous monitoring Hrs**  Total Technical Mgm t Adm in/Support Repair Planning 1 3,045 $ 38 32 2 4 0 Costs for Stripping Column and equipment 9,15 23,850 $ 0 0 0 0 0 TCI per Cooling tower 24,611 $ 38

Monitoring - El Paso stripping column for total strippable VOC 14 8,707 $ 182.5 0 0 0 0

Repair Costs 4

- $ 0 0 0 0 0 Recordkeeping 14

- $ 0 0 0 0 0 Reporting 6 410 $ 5.2 4 0.4 0.8 0 Training 8 452 $ 8 2 0 0 0 AOC (per HE sy stem) 9,230 $ TAC (per HE sy stem) 15,233 $

El Paso - specific costs... Assume 3 hours to set-up, and line-out, sample/analy ze per sam pling point 3 hrs/event Add 0.5 hours tech to review results. 0.5 hrs/event Training by

engr for 3 operators for 1 hour each once per y ear Costs from EnRUD Resources, Inc.; Price quote 11/2/10: purchasing equipment $13,850 Includes column, accessories, and OVA Costs from EnRUD Resources, Inc.; Price quote 11/2/10 Costs for 1st HE/CT sample $680 for 1st HE Costs for subsequent HE/CT sample $195 Prep /Setup + 2 hours Add 0.5 hours tech to review results. 0.5 hrs/event Assume 0.25 hours of operators for recordkeeping 0.25 hrs/HE Daily check 0.5 hrs/includes recordkeeping (365 day s/y r) 0.5 hrs/day check 0.5 hrs/includes recordkeeping (365 day hrs/day Shelter for continuous monitoring sy stem (estimated) $10,000

**Capital Recovery Factor (CRF)** Useful life of QA plan &/or monitor 5 yr s Annual interest rate 7% CRF 0.2439

Costs from 27 TexReg 5416 1y r $70,000 TAC as reported (2002 $) 30 TAC 115, Subch H, HRVOC, Div 3 for CT HES. 2y r $52,000 TAC as reported (2002 $) 21-Jun-02 Apparent equipment and planning costs $18,000 Estimated equipment costs $14,955Operators

0 0 This sheet evaluates the costs of direct cooling water sampling (determining a leak by difference from inlet and outlet) and the costs associated with the Texas El Paso stripping column method. It does not account for costs of leak repair; it assumes that these costs would be similar assuming the leak definition is effectively the same. Full speciation analysis for identifying the location of a leak are similar for water and air sampling. Similarly, it assumes recordkeeping and reporting costs would be similar regardless of the sampling method, being more a functionof frequency. Note: It would be difficult for

0 0 0 0 0

Operators 0 0

156

0 13.0 0 6**Cost Estimate for El Paso Sampling per Heat Exchange System when purchasing equipment continuous monitoring**

Operators 0 0

182.5

0 0 0 6

hrs/event hrs/event

for 1st HE Prep /Setup + 2 hours hrs/event

## Costs for Control Options

These are the costs used in the "Cost_by_HEsize" sheet **Summary Costs for Current Modeling Run - Costs per HE System**

**Monitoring Method Capital and**  **1x Costs A**  **nnualized**

**Capital Cost An**  **nual**

**Operating Costs**  **Total**

**An nualized**  **Costs** Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 761 $ 186

$ 604

$ 790

$ Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 761 $ 186

$ 2,007

$ 2,193

$ Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 761 $ 186

$ 5,202

$ 5,387

$ Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 761 $ 186

$ 21,174

$ 21,360

$ El Paso - contracted out 761 $ 186

$ 583

$ 769

$ El Paso - buy ing sy stem 4,224 $ 1,030

$ 1,309

$ 2,339

$ El Paso - buy ing sy stem 4,224 $ 1,030

$ 2,882

$ 3,912

$ El Paso - buy ing sy stem 4,224 $ 1,030

$ 10,744

$ 11,775

$ El Paso - continuous 24,611 $ 6,002

$ 9,230

$ 15,233

$

**Cost Estimate for Heat Exchange System Leak Repair**

Total Labor costs for finding & repairing 2,809 $ 60 Material costs for repair (=labor) 2,809 $ Speciated sample analy sis 400 $ Total cost for repair 6,018 $

These are the costs for different # of HE systems; cut-and-paste table to Cell B9 above to use in model

**Summary Costs for Current Modeling Run - Costs per HE System**

**Monitoring Method Capital and**  **1x Costs A**  **nnualized**

**Capital Cost An**  **nual**

**Operating Costs**  **Total**

**An nualized**  **Costs** Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 3,045 $ 743

$ 604

$ 1,347

$ Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 3,045 $ 743

$ 2,007

$ 2,750

$ Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 3,045 $ 743

$ 5,202

$ 5,944

$ Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 3,045 $ 743

$ 21,174

$ 21,917

$ El Paso - contracted out 3,045 $ 743

$ 947

$ 1,690

$ El Paso - contracted out 3,045 $ 743

$ 3,316

$ 4,059

$ El Paso - buy ing sy stem 16,895 $ 4,120

$ 3,221

$ 7,341

$ El Paso - buy ing sy stem 16,895 $ 4,120

$ 11,084

$ 15,204

$ El Paso - continuous 26,895 $ 6,559

$ 9,569

$ 16,129

$ This sheet fixes costs from "Cost by monitoring method" for use in the impacts analysis used in Sheet "Cost_by_Ctsize"**Summary Costs for Current Modeling Run - Costs per HE System**

**Monitoring Method Capital and**  **1x Costs A**  **nnualized**

**Capital Cost An**  **nual**

**Operating Costs**  **Total**

**An nualized**  **Costs** Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 1,522 $ 371

$ 604

$ 975

$ Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 1,522 $ 371

$ 2,007

$ 2,378

$ Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 1,522 $ 371

$ 5,202

$ 5,573

$ Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 1,522 $ 371

$ 21,174

$ 21,546

$ El Paso - contracted out 1,522 $ 371

$ 705

$ 1,076

$ El Paso - contracted out 1,522 $ 371

$ 2,346

$ 2,718

$ El Paso - buy ing sy stem 8,447 $ 2,060

$ 2,995

$ 5,055

$ El Paso - buy ing sy stem 8,447 $ 2,060

$ 10,857

$ 12,918

$ El Paso - continuous 25,372 $ 6,188

$ 9,343

$ 15,531

$

**Summary Costs for Current Modeling Run - Costs per HE System**

**Monitoring Method Capital and**  **1x Costs A**  **nnualized**

**Capital Cost An**  **nual**

**Operating Costs**  **Total**

**An nualized**  **Costs** Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 761 $ 186

$ 604

$ 790

$ Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 761 $ 186

$ 2,007

$ 2,193

$ Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 761 $ 186

$ 5,202

$ 5,387

$ Wa ter sampling speciated org. in only 761 $ 186

$ 21,174

$ 21,360

$ El Paso - contracted out 761 $ 186

$ 583

$ 769

$ El Paso - buy ing sy stem 4,224 $ 1,030

$ 1,309

$ 2,339

$ El Paso - buy ing sy stem 4,224 $ 1,030

$ 2,882

$ 3,912

$ El Paso - buy ing sy stem 4,224 $ 1,030

$ 10,744

$ 11,775

$ El Paso - continuous 24,611 $ 6,002

$ 9,230

$ 15,233

$**No. HE No.**  **Events** 4 1 4 4 4 12 4 52 4 1 4 4 4 12 4 52 4 8760

Technical Mgm t Adm in/Support Repair Operators 0 0 40 20

These are the costs for different # of HE systems; cut-and-paste table to Cell B9 above to use in model

**No. HE No.** 

**Events** 1 1 1 4 1 12 1 52 1 1 1 4 1 12 1 52 1 8760 This sheet fixes costs from "Cost by monitoring method" for use in the impacts analysis used in Sheet "Cost_by_Ctsize"**No. HE No.**  **Events** 2 1 2 4 2 12 2 52 2 1 2 4 2 12 2 52 2 8760

**No. HE No.** 

**Events** 4 1 4 4 4 12 4 52 4 1 4 4 4 12 4 52 4 8760Appendix C

15,233 $ 16,689

$ 1.46 (731) $ 15,958

$ 10,912.52

15,233 $ 16,689

$ 4.39 (2,194) $ 14,495

$ 3,304.17

15,233 $ 16,689

$ 11.70 (5,849) $ 10,840

$ 926.57

0900006480f64192.xls Cost by HEsize

### Results for 1 HE sy **stems at facility ; 50% delay**  **ed leak repair, $500/ton VOC credit** No. HE per facility 1 Reduct_Factor 0.3 Leak_Defn 1000 ppbw Fr_Delay ed 0.5 Delay _Lim it 5000 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton

**Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 3,045 $ 1,822

$ 1,410

$ 0.82 1,710 $ 15,000 3,045

$ 1,822

$ 586

$ 2.47 237 $ 40,000 3,045

$ 1,822

$ (1,475)

$ 6.59 (224) $ 110,000 3,045

$ 1,822

$ (7,245)

$ 18.13 (400) $

**Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 3,045 $ 4,191

$ 3,682

$ 1.02 3,610 $ 15,000 3,045

$ 4,191

$ 2,662

$ 3.06 870 $ 40,000 3,045

$ 4,191

$ 113

$ 8.16 14 $ 110,000 3,045

$ 4,191

$ (7,025)

$ 22.43 (313) $

**Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling**

**Model Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery VOC Emiss**  **Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) w/recovery**  **credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 16,895 $ 7,474

$ 6,942

$ 1.06 6,530 $ 15,000 16,895

$ 7,474

$ 5,879

$ 3.19 1,843 $ 40,000 16,895

$ 7,474

$ 3,221

$ 8.51 379 $ 110,000 16,895

$ 7,474

$ (4,221)

$ 23.39 (180) $

**Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 16,895 $ 15,336

$ 14,797

$ 1.08 13,702 $ 15,000 16,895

$ 15,336

$ 13,717

$ 3.24 4,234 $ 40,000 16,895

$ 15,336

$ 11,017

$ 8.64 1,275 $ 110,000 16,895

$ 15,336

$ 3,458

$ 23.76 146 $

**Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)**5,000 26,895 $ 16,261

$ 15,719

$ 1.08 14,490 $ 15,000 26,895

$ 16,261

$ 14,634

$ 3.25 4,497 $ 40,000 26,895

$ 16,261

$ 11,922

$ 8.68 1,374 $ 110,000 26,895

$ 16,261

$ 4,328

$ 23.87 181 $

No. HE 202

**Summary of results for 5,000 gpm CT**

Net TAC Em Red 1a 1,410

$ 0.82 1b 1,569

$ 1.03 1c 1,937

$ 1.09 1d 2,587

$ 1.12 2a 3,682

$ 1.02 2b 3,818

$ 1.28 2c 4,179

$ 1.35 2d 4,827

$ 1.38 3a 6,942

$ 1.06 3b 7,074

$ 1.33 3c 7,433

$ 1.41 3d 8,081

$ 1.43 4a 14,797

$ 1.08 4b 14,927

$ 1.35 4c 15,285

$ 1.43 4d 15,933

$ 1.46 5a 15,719

$ 1.08 5b 15,848

$ 1.36 5c 16,206

$ 1.43 5d 16,854

$ 1.46

CE IncrCE 1b 1,569

$ 1.03 1,517 $ 2b 3,818

$ 1.28 2,994 $ 9,345

$ 2c 4,179

$ 1.35 3,099 $ 4,933

$ 3c 7,433

$ 1.41 5,290 $ 57,599

$ 5c 16,206

$ 1.43 11,307 $ 311,019

$

$

- $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 $18,000 

# 5,000 GPM HE System

Annual Quarterly Monthly Weekly

Continuous$

-

- 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 **Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system)**

### Results for 1 HE sy **stems at facility ; 50% delay**  **ed leak repair, $500/ton VOC credit** No. HE per facility 1 Reduct_Factor 0.3 Leak_Defn 80 ppbw Fr_Delay ed 0.5 Delay _Lim it 800 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton

**Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 3,045 $ 2,087

$ 1,569

$ 1.03 1,517 $ 15,000 3,045

$ 2,087

$ 535

$ 3.10 172 $ 40,000 3,045

$ 2,087

$ (2,052)

$ 8.28 (248) $ 110,000 3,045

$ 2,087

$ (9,296)

$ 22.77 (408) $

**Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 3,045 $ 4,456

$ 3,818

$ 1.28 2,994 $ 15,000 3,045

$ 4,456

$ 2,543

$ 3.83 665 $ 40,000 3,045

$ 4,456

$ (646)

$ 10.20 (63) $ 110,000 3,045

$ 4,456

$ (9,574)

$ 28.06 (341) $

**Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling**

**Model Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery VOC Emiss**  **Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) w/recovery**  **credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 16,895 $ 7,738

$ 7,074

$ 1.33 5,323 $ 15,000 16,895

$ 7,738

$ 5,745

$ 3.99 1,441 $ 40,000 16,895

$ 7,738

$ 2,423

$ 10.63 228 $ 110,000 16,895

$ 7,738

$ (6,880)

$ 29.24 (235) $

**Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 16,895 $ 15,601

$ 14,927

$ 1.35 11,061 $ 15,000 16,895

$ 15,601

$ 13,577

$ 4.05 3,354 $ 40,000 16,895

$ 15,601

$ 10,203

$ 10.80 945 $ 110,000 16,895

$ 15,601

$ 757

$ 29.69 25 $

**Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)**5,000 26,895 $ 16,526

$ 15,848

$ 1.36 11,691 $ 15,000 26,895

$ 16,526

$ 14,492

$ 4.07 3,564 $ 40,000 26,895

$ 16,526

$ 11,103

$ 10.85 1,024 $ 110,000 26,895

$ 16,526

$ 1,614

$ 29.82 54 $

No. HE 150

**Summary of results for 15,000 gpm CT**

Net TAC Em Red 1a 586

$ 2.47 1b 535

$ 3.10 1c 843

$ 3.28 1,470 $ 3.35 2a 2,662

$ 3.06 2b 2,543

$ 3.83 2c 2,831

$ 4.05 3,451 $ 4.13 3a 5,879

$ 3.19 3b 5,745

$ 3.99 3c 6,028

$ 4.22 6,647 $ 4.30 4a 13,717

$ 3.24 4b 13,577

$ 4.05 4c 13,858

$ 4.28 14,477 $ 4.37 5a 14,634

$ 3.25 5b 14,492

$ 4.07 5c 14,773

$ 4.30 15,392 $ 4.39

CE IncrCE 535 $ 3.10 172 $ 2,543 $ 3.83 665 $ 2,782

$ 2,831 $ 4.05 700 $ 1,311

$ 6,028 $ 4.22 1,430 $ 18,866

$ 14,773 $ 4.30 3,436 $ 103,340

$

$(2,000) $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000

$

- $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 $18,000 

# 15,000 GPM HE System

Annual Quarterly Monthly Weekly

Continuous$(4,000) $

-

- 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

**Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system)**No. HE per facility 1 Reduct_Factor 0.3 No. HE per facility

Leak_Defn 40 ppbw Fr_Delay ed 0.5 Leak_Defn Delay _Lim it 800 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton Delay _Lim it

**Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling** 

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons) Model**  **Size (gpm)**  5,000 3,045 $ 2,484

$ 1,937

$ 1.09 1,770 $ 5,000 15,000 3,045

$ 2,484

$ 843

$ 3.28 257 $ 15,000 40,000 3,045

$ 2,484

$ (1,893)

$ 8.75 (216) $ 40,000 110,000 3,045

$ 2,484

$ (9,554)

$ 24.08 (397) $ 110,000

**Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling** 

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons) Model**  **Size (gpm)**  5,000 3,045 $ 4,853

$ 4,179

$ 1.35 3,099 $ 5,000 15,000 3,045

$ 4,853

$ 2,831

$ 4.05 700 $ 15,000 40,000 3,045

$ 4,853

$ (541)

$ 10.79 (50) $ 40,000 110,000 3,045

$ 4,853

$ (9,981)

$ 29.67 (336) $ 110,000

**Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling** 

**Model Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery VOC Emiss**  **Model Model**  **Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/yr)**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons) Model**  **Size (gpm)**  5,000 16,895 $ 8,136

$ 7,433

$ 1.41 5,290 $ 5,000 15,000 16,895

$ 8,136

$ 6,028

$ 4.22 1,430 $ 15,000 40,000 16,895

$ 8,136

$ 2,515

$ 11.24 224 $ 40,000 110,000 16,895

$ 8,136

$ (7,320)

$ 30.91 (237) $ 110,000

**Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling** 

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons) Model**  **Size (gpm)**  5,000 16,895 $ 15,998

$ 15,285

$ 1.43 10,713 $ 5,000 15,000 16,895

$ 15,998

$ 13,858

$ 4.28 3,238 $ 15,000 40,000 16,895

$ 15,998

$ 10,291

$ 11.41 902 $ 40,000 110,000 16,895

$ 15,998

$ 304

$ 31.39 10 $ 110,000

**Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling** 

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons) Model**  **Size (gpm)** 5,000 26,895 $ 16,923

$ 16,206

$ 1.43 11,307 $ 5,000 15,000 26,895

$ 16,923

$ 14,773

$ 4.30 3,436 $ 15,000 40,000 26,895

$ 16,923

$ 11,190

$ 11.47 976 $ 40,000 110,000 26,895

$ 16,923

$ 1,157

$ 31.53 37 $ 110,000

No. HE 150 No. HE

**Summary of results for 40,000 gpm CT Summary of results for 110,000 gpm CT** 

Net TAC Em Red 1a (1,475)

$ 6.59 1a 1b (2,052)

$ 8.28 1b 1c (1,893)

$ 8.75 1c (1,324) $ 8.94 2a 113

$ 8.16 2a 2b (646)

$ 10.20 2b 2c (541)

$ 10.79 2c

11 $ 11.01 3a 3,221

$ 8.51 3a 3b 2,423

$ 10.63 3b 3c 2,515

$ 11.24 3c 3,063 $ 11.47 4a 11,017

$ 8.64 4a 4b 10,203

$ 10.80 4b 4c 10,291

$ 11.41 4c 10,837 $ 11.65 5a 11,922

$ 8.68 5a 5b 11,103

$ 10.85 5b 5c 11,190

$ 11.47 5c 11,736 $ 11.70

CE IncrCE (2,052) $ 8.28 (248) $ (646) $ 10.20 (63) $ 731

$ (541) $ 10.79 (50) $ 179

$ 2,515 $ 11.24 224 $ 6,762

$ 11,190 $ 11.47 976 $ 38,440

$

$(2,000) $

- $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000

- 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00



# 40,000 GPM HE System

Annual Quarterly Monthly Weekly

Continuous

$(12,000) $(10,000) $(8,000) $(6,000) $(4,000) $(2,000) $

- $2,000 $4,000 $6,000

-$(4,000) **Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system)** $(12,000)1 Reduct_Factor 0.3 10 ppbw Fr_Delay ed 0.5 800 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton

**Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling**

**TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C w/recovery**  **credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 3,045 $ 3,146

$ 2,587

$ 1.12 2,316 $ 3,045 $ 3,146

$ 1,470

$ 3.35 439 $ 3,045 $ 3,146

$ (1,324)

$ 8.94 (148) $ 3,045 $ 3,146

$ (9,145)

$ 24.58 (372) $

**Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling**

**TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C w/recovery**  **credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 3,045 $ 5,515

$ 4,827

$ 1.38 3,508 $ 3,045 $ 5,515

$ 3,451

$ 4.13 836 $ 3,045 $ 5,515

$ 11

$ 11.01 1 $ 3,045 $ 5,515

$ (9,622)

$ 30.27 (318) $

**Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery VOC Emiss** 

**TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/yr)**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 16,895 $ 8,798

$ 8,081

$ 1.43 5,637 $ 16,895 $ 8,798

$ 6,647

$ 4.30 1,546 $ 16,895 $ 8,798

$ 3,063

$ 11.47 267 $ 16,895 $ 8,798

$ (6,972)

$ 31.54 (221) $

**Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling**

**TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C w/recovery**  **credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 16,895 $ 16,660

$ 15,933

$ 1.46 10,945 $ 16,895 $ 16,660

$ 14,477

$ 4.37 3,315 $ 16,895 $ 16,660

$ 10,837

$ 11.65 931 $ 16,895 $ 16,660

$ 647

$ 32.03 20 $

**Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling**

**TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C w/recovery**  **credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)**26,895

$ 17,585

$ 16,854

$ 1.46 11,525 $ 26,895 $ 17,585

$ 15,392

$ 4.39 3,508 $ 26,895 $ 17,585

$ 11,736

$ 11.70 1,003 $ 26,895 $ 17,585

$ 1,499

$ 32.17 47 $

18

**Summary of results for 110,000 gpm CT Summary of Nationwide Results** 

Net TAC Em Red (7,245) $ 18.13 1a (9,296) $ 22.77 1b (9,554) $ 24.08 1c (9,145) $ 24.58 (7,025) $ 22.43 2a (9,574) $ 28.06 2b (9,981) $ 29.67 Quarterly _all 2c (9,622) $ 30.27 Quarterly _small/Monthly

_large 2c/3c (4,221) $ 23.39 3a (6,880) $ 29.24 Monthly _all 3b (7,320) $ 30.91 Monthly _all 3c (6,972) $ 31.54 3,458 $ 23.76 4a 757 $ 29.69 4b 304 $ 31.39 4c 647 $ 32.03 4,328 $ 23.87 5a 1,614 $ 29.82 5b 1,157 $ 31.53 5c 1,499 $ 32.17

CE IncrCE (9,296) $ 22.77 (408) $ 3b (9,574) $ 28.06 (341) $ (52)

$ 2c (9,981) $ 29.67 (336) $ (253)

$ 2c/3c (7,320) $ 30.91 (237) $ 2,141

$ 3c 1,157 $ 31.53 37 $ 13,660

$ 5c

5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 

# 110,000 GPM HE System

Annual Quarterly Monthly Weekly

Continuous**Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system) Summary of Nationwide Results** 

Net TAC Em Red 20,952 $ 1,853.02 (77,965) $ 2,326.23 61,654 $ 2,460.06 379,977 $ 2,511.87 1,033,370 $ 2,292.32 883,608 $ 2,867.22 1,007,973 $ 3,031.56 1,514,309 $ 3,121.73

2,530,268 $ 2,987.44 MACT Floor 2,651,244 $ 3,158.56 2,963,353 $ 3,222.79 6,761,222 $ 2,427.49 6,595,815 $ 3,033.68 6,715,487 $ 3,207.41 7,027,162 $ 3,272.51 7,236,458 $ 2,438.69 7,069,755 $ 3,047.47 7,189,038 $ 3,221.97 7,500,583 $ 3,287.34

CE IncrCE 2,530,268 $ 2,987.44 847 $ 1,007,973 $ 3,031.56 332 $ (34,505)

$ 1,514,309 $ 3,121.73 485 $ 5,616

$ 2,651,244 $ 3,158.56 839 $ 30,866

$ 7,189,038 $ 3,221.97 2,231 $ 71,560

$**Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly**  **sampling Summary**  **of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling** 

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/y r)**  **Av e. TA** 

**C w/**  **recovery credits**  **($/y r)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/y**  **r) Cost-Effect** 

**($/tons) Model**  **Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/y**  **r) Av**  **e. TA**

**C w/**  **recovery credits**  **($/y r)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/y**  **r)** 5,000 1,522 $ 2,850

$ 2,340

$ 1.02 2,295 $ 5,000 1,522 $ 3,115

$ 2,477

$ 1.28 15,000 1,522

$ 2,850

$ 1,321

$ 3.06 432 $ 15,000 1,522 $ 3,115

$ 1,202

$ 3.83 40,000 1,522

$ 2,850

$ (1,229)

$ 8.16 (151) $ 40,000 1,522 $ 3,115

$ (1,987)

$ 10.20 110,000 1,522

$ 2,850

$ (8,367)

$ 22.43 (373) $ 110,000 1,522 $ 3,115

$ (10,915)

$ 28.06

**Summary**

**of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling**  **Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly**  **sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/y r)**  **Av e. TA** 

**C w/**  **recovery credits**  **($/y r)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/y**  **r) Cost-Effect** 

**($/tons) Model**  **Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/y**  **r) Av**  **e. TA**

**C w/**  **recovery credits**  **($/y r)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/y**  **r)** 5,000 8,447 $ 5,187

$ 4,656

$ 1.06 4,379 $ 5,000 8,447 $ 5,452

$ 4,788

$ 1.33 15,000 8,447

$ 5,187

$ 3,593

$ 3.19 1,126 $ 15,000 8,447 $ 5,452

$ 3,459

$ 3.99 40,000 8,447

$ 5,187

$ 935

$ 8.51 110 $ 40,000 8,447 $ 5,452

$ 136

$ 10.63 110,000 8,447

$ 5,187

$ (6,507)

$ 23.39 (278) $ 110,000 8,447 $ 5,452

$ (9,166)

$ 29.24

**Summary**

**of Results for Option 4 - w eekly**  **sampling Summary**  **of Results for Option 4 - w eekly**  **sampling**

**Model Size**  **Av e. TA**  **C w/**  **recovery credits**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction Cost-Effect**  **Model Size**  **Av e. TA**  **C w/**  **recovery credits**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction**

11/1/2011 0900006480f64192.xls Results_2

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/y r)**  **w/ recovery** 

**credits ($/y**  **r) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/y**  **r) Cost-Effect** 

**($/tons) Model**  **Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/y**  **r) w/**  **recovery**

**credits ($/y**  **r) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/y**  **r)** 5,000 8,447 $ 13,050

$ 12,510

$ 1.08 11,585 $ 5,000 8,447 $ 13,315

$ 12,640

$ 1.35 15,000 8,447

$ 13,050

$ 11,430

$ 3.24 3,528 $ 15,000 8,447 $ 13,315

$ 11,291

$ 4.05 40,000 8,447

$ 13,050

$ 8,731

$ 8.64 1,011 $ 40,000 8,447 $ 13,315

$ 7,917

$ 10.80 110,000 8,447

$ 13,050

$ 1,172

$ 23.76 49 $ 110,000 8,447 $ 13,315

$ (1,530)

$ 29.69

**Summary**

**of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling Summary**  **of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/y r)**  **Av e. TA** 

**C w/**  **recovery credits**  **($/y r)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/y**  **r) Cost-Effect** 

**($/tons) Model**  **Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/y**  **r) Av**  **e. TA**

**C w/**  **recovery credits**  **($/y r)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/y**  **r)** 5,000 25,372 $ 15,664

$ 15,121

$ 1.08 13,939 $ 5,000 25,372 $ 15,929

$ 15,251

$ 1.36 15,000 25,372

$ 15,664

$ 14,036

$ 3.25 4,313 $ 15,000 25,372 $ 15,929

$ 13,895

$ 4.07 40,000 25,372

$ 15,664

$ 11,324

$ 8.68 1,305 $ 40,000 25,372 $ 15,929

$ 10,506

$ 10.85

11/1/2011 0900006480f64192.xls Results_2

### Results for 4 HE sy **stem at facility ; 50% delay**  **ed repair; $500 recovery credit**  No. HE per facility 4 Reduct_Factor 0.3 Leak_Defn 1000 ppbw Fr_Delay ed 0.5 Delay _Lim it 5000 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton

**Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 761 $ 901

$ 489

$ 0.82 594 $ 15,000 761

$ 901

$ (335)

$ 2.47 (135) $ 40,000 761

$ 901

$ (2,396)

$ 6.59 (363) $ 110,000 761

$ 901

$ (8,166)

$ 18.13 (450) $

**Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 4,224 $ 2,472

$ 1,962

$ 1.02 1,924 $ 15,000 4,224

$ 2,472

$ 942

$ 3.06 308 $ 40,000 4,224

$ 2,472

$ (1,607)

$ 8.16 (197) $ 110,000 4,224

$ 2,472

$ (8,745)

$ 22.43 (390) $

**Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling**

**Model Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery VOC Emiss**  **Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) w/recovery**  **credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 4,224 $ 4,044

$ 3,513

$ 1.06 3,304 $ 15,000 4,224

$ 4,044

$ 2,449

$ 3.19 768 $ 40,000 4,224

$ 4,044

$ (208)

$ 8.51 (25) $ 110,000 4,224

$ 4,044

$ (7,650)

$ 23.39 (327) $

**Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 4,224 $ 11,907

$ 11,367

$ 1.08 10,527 $ 15,000 4,224

$ 11,907

$ 10,287

$ 3.24 3,176 $ 40,000 4,224

$ 11,907

$ 7,588

$ 8.64 878 $ 110,000 4,224

$ 11,907

$ 29

$ 23.76 1 $

**Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)**5,000 24,611 $ 15,365

$ 14,823

$ 1.08 13,664 $ 15,000 24,611

$ 15,365

$ 13,738

$ 3.25 4,221 $ 40,000 24,611

$ 15,365

$ 11,026

$ 8.68 1,270 $ 110,000 24,611

$ 15,365

$ 3,432

$ 23.87 144 $

No. HE 202

**Summary of results for 5,000 gpm CT**

Net TAC Em Red 1a 489

$ 0.82 1b 649

$ 1.03 1c 1,016

$ 1.09 1d 1,667

$ 1.12 2a 1,962

$ 1.02 2b 2,099

$ 1.28 2c 2,459

$ 1.35 2d 3,107

$ 1.38 3a 3,513

$ 1.06 3b 3,644

$ 1.33 3c 4,004

$ 1.41 3d 4,651

$ 1.43 4a 11,367

$ 1.08 4b 11,497

$ 1.35 4c 11,856

$ 1.43 4d 12,503

$ 1.46 5a 14,823

$ 1.08 5b 14,952

$ 1.36 5c 15,310

$ 1.43 5d 15,958

$ 1.46

CE IncrCE 1b 649

$ 1.03 627 $ 2b 2,099

$ 1.28 1,645 $ 6,025

$ 2c 2,459

$ 1.35 1,824 $ 4,933

$ 3c 4,004

$ 1.41 2,849 $ 27,336

$ 5c 15,310

$ 1.43 10,682 $ 400,829

$

$2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 $18,000**T o** **t a** **l A** **n n** **u a** **l i** **z e** **d C** **o s** **t (** **$ /** **y r** **/ H** **E s** **y s** **t e** **m )**  

# 5,000 GPM HE System

Annual Quarterly Monthly Weekly

Continuous$

-

$2,000

- 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00**T o** **t a** **l A** **n n** **u a** **l i** **z e** **d C** **o s** **t (** **$ /** **y r** **/ H** **E s** **y s** **t e** **m )** 

**Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system)**No. HE per facility 4 Reduct_Factor 0.3 Leak_Defn 80 ppbw Fr_Delay ed 0.5 Delay _Lim it 800 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton

**Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 761 $ 1,166

$ 649

$ 1.03 627 $ 15,000 761

$ 1,166

$ (386)

$ 3.10 (124) $ 40,000 761

$ 1,166

$ (2,973)

$ 8.28 (359) $ 110,000 761

$ 1,166

$ (10,217)

$ 22.77 (449) $

**Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 4,224 $ 2,736

$ 2,099

$ 1.28 1,645 $ 15,000 4,224

$ 2,736

$ 823

$ 3.83 215 $ 40,000 4,224

$ 2,736

$ (2,365)

$ 10.20 (232) $ 110,000 4,224

$ 2,736

$ (11,294)

$ 28.06 (402) $

**Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling**

**Model Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery VOC Emiss**  **Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) w/recovery**  **credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 4,224 $ 4,309

$ 3,644

$ 1.33 2,742 $ 15,000 4,224

$ 4,309

$ 2,315

$ 3.99 581 $ 40,000 4,224

$ 4,309

$ (1,007)

$ 10.63 (95) $ 110,000 4,224

$ 4,309

$ (10,309)

$ 29.24 (353) $

**Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 4,224 $ 12,172

$ 11,497

$ 1.35 8,519 $ 15,000 4,224

$ 12,172

$ 10,147

$ 4.05 2,506 $ 40,000 4,224

$ 12,172

$ 6,774

$ 10.80 627 $ 110,000 4,224

$ 12,172

$ (2,673)

$ 29.69 (90) $

**Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling**

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)**5,000 24,611 $ 15,630

$ 14,952

$ 1.36 11,029 $ 15,000 24,611

$ 15,630

$ 13,596

$ 4.07 3,343 $ 40,000 24,611

$ 15,630

$ 10,207

$ 10.85 941 $ 110,000 24,611

$ 15,630

$ 718

$ 29.82 24 $

No. HE 150

**Summary of results for 15,000 gpm CT**

Net TAC Em Red 1a (335)

$ 2.47 1b (386)

$ 3.10 1c (78)

$ 3.28 549 $ 3.35 2a 942

$ 3.06 2b 823

$ 3.83 2c 1,111

$ 4.05 1,731 $ 4.13 3a 2,449

$ 3.19 3b 2,315

$ 3.99 3c 2,598

$ 4.22 3,218 $ 4.30 4a 10,287

$ 3.24 4b 10,147

$ 4.05 4c 10,429

$ 4.28 11,047 $ 4.37 5a 13,738

$ 3.25 5b 13,596

$ 4.07 5c 13,877

$ 4.30 14,495 $ 4.39

CE IncrCE (386) $ 3.10 (124) $ 823 $ 3.83 215 $ 1,675

$ 1,111 $ 4.05 275 $ 1,311

$ 2,598 $ 4.22 616 $ 8,779

$ 13,877 $ 4.30 3,227 $ 133,276

$

$(2,000) $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000**T o** **t a** **l A** **n n** **u a** **l i** **z e** **d C** **o s** **t (** **$ /** **y r** **/ H** **E s** **y s** **t e** **m )** 

$

- $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000**T o** **t a** **l A** **n n** **u a** **l i** **z e** **d C** **o s** **t (** **$ /** **y r** **/ H** **E s** **y s** **t e** **m )**  

# 15,000 GPM HE System

Annual Quarterly Monthly Weekly

Continuous$(4,000) $(2,000)**T o** **t a** **l A** **n n** **u a** **l i** **z e** **d C** **o s** **t (** **$ /** **y r** **/ H** **E s** **y s** **t e** **m )** 

$(2,000) $

-

- 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00**T o** **t a** **l A** **n n** **u a** **l i** **z e** **d C** **o s** **t (** **$ /** **y r** **/ H** **E s** **y s** **t e** **m )** 

**Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system)**No. HE per facility 4 Reduct_Factor 0.3 No. HE per facility

Leak_Defn 40 ppbw Fr_Delay ed 0.5 Leak_Defn Delay _Lim it 800 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton Delay _Lim it

**Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling** 

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons) Model**  **Size (gpm)**  5,000 761 $ 1,563

$ 1,016

$ 1.09 929 $ 5,000 15,000 761

$ 1,563

$ (78)

$ 3.28 (24) $ 15,000 40,000 761

$ 1,563

$ (2,814)

$ 8.75 (321) $ 40,000 110,000 761

$ 1,563

$ (10,474)

$ 24.08 (435) $ 110,000

**Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling** 

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons) Model**  **Size (gpm)**  5,000 4,224 $ 3,134

$ 2,459

$ 1.35 1,824 $ 5,000 15,000 4,224

$ 3,134

$ 1,111

$ 4.05 275 $ 15,000 40,000 4,224

$ 3,134

$ (2,261)

$ 10.79 (210) $ 40,000 110,000 4,224

$ 3,134

$ (11,701)

$ 29.67 (394) $ 110,000

**Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling** 

**Model Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery VOC Emiss**  **Model Model**  **Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/yr)**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons) Model**  **Size (gpm)**  5,000 4,224 $ 4,706

$ 4,004

$ 1.41 2,849 $ 5,000 15,000 4,224

$ 4,706

$ 2,598

$ 4.22 616 $ 15,000 40,000 4,224

$ 4,706

$ (914)

$ 11.24 (81) $ 40,000 110,000 4,224

$ 4,706

$ (10,750)

$ 30.91 (348) $ 110,000

**Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling** 

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons) Model**  **Size (gpm)**  5,000 4,224 $ 12,569

$ 11,856

$ 1.43 8,309 $ 5,000 15,000 4,224

$ 12,569

$ 10,429

$ 4.28 2,436 $ 15,000 40,000 4,224

$ 12,569

$ 6,862

$ 11.41 601 $ 40,000 110,000 4,224

$ 12,569

$ (3,126)

$ 31.39 (100) $ 110,000

**Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling** 

**Model Size**  **(gpm) TCI ($)**  **Av e. TA**  **C ($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons) Model**  **Size (gpm)** 5,000 24,611 $ 16,027

$ 15,310

$ 1.43 10,682 $ 5,000 15,000 24,611

$ 16,027

$ 13,877

$ 4.30 3,227 $ 15,000 40,000 24,611

$ 16,027

$ 10,294

$ 11.47 898 $ 40,000 110,000 24,611

$ 16,027

$ 261

$ 31.53 8 $ 110,000

No. HE 150 No. HE

**Summary of results for 40,000 gpm CT Summary of results for 110,000 gpm CT** 

Net TAC Em Red 1a (2,396)

$ 6.59 1a 1b (2,973)

$ 8.28 1b 1c (2,814)

$ 8.75 1c (2,244) $ 8.94 2a (1,607)

$ 8.16 2a 2b (2,365)

$ 10.20 2b 2c (2,261)

$ 10.79 2c (1,709) $ 11.01 3a (208)

$ 8.51 3a 3b (1,007)

$ 10.63 3b 3c (914)

$ 11.24 3c (366) $ 11.47 4a 7,588

$ 8.64 4a 4b 6,774

$ 10.80 4b 4c 6,862

$ 11.41 4c 7,408 $ 11.65 5a 11,026

$ 8.68 5a 5b 10,207

$ 10.85 5b 5c 10,294

$ 11.47 5c 10,840 $ 11.70

CE IncrCE (2,973) $ 8.28 (359) $ (2,365) $ 10.20 (232) $ 316

$ (2,261) $ 10.79 (210) $ 179

$ (914) $ 11.24 (81) $ 2,979

$ 10,294 $ 11.47 898 $ 49,666

$

$(2,000) $

- $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000

- 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00



# 40,000 GPM HE System

Annual Quarterly Monthly Weekly

Continuous

$(12,000) $(10,000) $(8,000) $(6,000) $(4,000) $(2,000) $

- $2,000 $4,000 $6,000

-**T o** **t a** **l A** **n n** **u a** **l i** **z e** **d C** **o s** **t (** **$ /** **y r** **/ H** **E s** **y s** **t e** **m )** $(4,000) $(2,000)

**Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system)** $(14,000) $(12,000)**T o** **t a** **l A** **n n** **u a** **l i** **z e** **d C** **o s** **t (** **$ /** **y r** **/ H** **E s** **y s** **t e** **m )** 4 Reduct_Factor 0.3 10 ppbw Fr_Delay ed 0.5 800 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton

**Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling**

**TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C w/recovery**  **credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 761 $ 2,225

$ 1,667

$ 1.12 1,492 $ 761 $ 2,225

$ 549

$ 3.35 164 $ 761 $ 2,225

$ (2,244)

$ 8.94 (251) $ 761 $ 2,225

$ (10,066)

$ 24.58 (409) $

**Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling**

**TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C w/recovery**  **credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 4,224 $ 3,795

$ 3,107

$ 1.38 2,258 $ 4,224 $ 3,795

$ 1,731

$ 4.13 419 $ 4,224 $ 3,795

$ (1,709)

$ 11.01 (155) $ 4,224 $ 3,795

$ (11,342)

$ 30.27 (375) $

**Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling Av**  **e. TA C**  **w/recovery VOC Emiss** 

**TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/yr)**  **w/recovery credits**  **($/yr) VOC Emiss** 

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 4,224 $ 5,368

$ 4,651

$ 1.43 3,244 $ 4,224 $ 5,368

$ 3,218

$ 4.30 748 $ 4,224 $ 5,368

$ (366)

$ 11.47 (32) $ 4,224 $ 5,368

$ (10,402)

$ 31.54 (330) $

**Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling**

**TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C w/recovery**  **credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 4,224 $ 13,231

$ 12,503

$ 1.46 8,589 $ 4,224 $ 13,231

$ 11,047

$ 4.37 2,530 $ 4,224 $ 13,231

$ 7,408

$ 11.65 636 $ 4,224 $ 13,231

$ (2,782)

$ 32.03 (87) $

**Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling**

**TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C ($/yr)**  **Av e. TA**  **C w/recovery**  **credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)**24,611

$ 16,689

$ 15,958

$ 1.46 10,913 $ 24,611 $ 16,689

$ 14,495

$ 4.39 3,304 $ 24,611 $ 16,689

$ 10,840

$ 11.70 927 $ 24,611 $ 16,689

$ 603

$ 32.17 19 $

18

**Summary of results for 110,000 gpm CT Summary of Nationwide Results** 

Net TAC Em Red (8,166) $ 18.13 1a (10,217) $ 22.77 1b (10,474) $ 24.08 1c (10,066) $ 24.58 (8,745) $ 22.43 2a (11,294) $ 28.06 2b (11,701) $ 29.67 Quarterly _all 2c (11,342) $ 30.27 Quarterly _small/Monthly

_large 2c/3c (7,650) $ 23.39 3a (10,309) $ 29.24 Monthly _all 3b (10,750) $ 30.91 Monthly _all 3c (10,402) $ 31.54

29 $ 23.76 4a (2,673) $ 29.69 4b (3,126) $ 31.39 4c (2,782) $ 32.03 3,432 $ 23.87 5a 718 $ 29.82 5b 261 $ 31.53 5c 603 $ 32.17

CE IncrCE (10,217) $ 22.77 (449) $ 3b (11,294) $ 28.06 (402) $ (203)

$ 2c (11,701) $ 29.67 (394) $ (253)

$ 2c/3c (10,750) $ 30.91 (348) $ 765

$ 3c 261 $ 31.53 8 $ 17,742

$ 5c

5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 

# 110,000 GPM HE System

Annual Quarterly Monthly Weekly

Continuous**Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system) Summary of Nationwide Results** 

Net TAC Em Red (457,790) $ 1,853.02 (556,707) $ 2,326.23 (417,088) $ 2,460.06 (98,765) $ 2,511.87 139,043 $ 2,292.32 (10,719) $ 2,867.22 113,646 $ 3,031.56 332,754 $ 3,121.73

746,904 $ 2,987.44 MACT Floor 867,880 $ 3,158.56 1,179,989 $ 3,222.79 4,977,858 $ 2,427.49 4,812,451 $ 3,033.68 4,932,123 $ 3,207.41 5,243,798 $ 3,272.51 6,770,469 $ 2,438.69 6,603,766 $ 3,047.47 6,723,049 $ 3,221.97 7,034,594 $ 3,287.34

CE IncrCE 746,904 $ 2,987.44 250 $ 3,038.03 113,646 $ 3,031.56 37 $ (14,354)

$ 3,140.07 332,754 $ 3,121.73 107 $ 2,430

$ 3,196.15 867,880 $ 3,158.56 275 $ 14,528

$ 3,219.59 6,723,049 $ 3,221.97 2,087 $ 92,334

$ 3,259.30No. HE per facility 4 Reduct_Factor 0.3 Leak_Defn 10 ppbw Fr_Delay ed 0.5 Delay _Lim it 800 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton

**Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling**

**Model Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C**  **($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C** 

**w/recovery credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 761 $ 2,225

$ 1,667

$ 1.12 1,492 $ 15,000 761

$ 2,225

$ 549

$ 3.35 164 $ 40,000 761

$ 2,225

$ (2,244)

$ 8.94 (251) $ 110,000 761

$ 2,225

$ (10,066)

$ 24.58 (409) $

**Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling**

**Model Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C**  **($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C** 

**w/recovery credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 4,224 $ 3,795

$ 3,107

$ 1.38 2,258 $ 15,000 4,224

$ 3,795

$ 1,731

$ 4.13 419 $ 40,000 4,224

$ 3,795

$ (1,709)

$ 11.01 (155) $ 110,000 4,224

$ 3,795

$ (11,342)

$ 30.27 (375) $

**Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling**

**Model Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C**  **($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C** 

**w/recovery credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 4,224 $ 5,368

$ 4,651

$ 1.43 3,244 $ 15,000 4,224

$ 5,368

$ 3,218

$ 4.30 748 $ 40,000 4,224

$ 5,368

$ (366)

$ 11.47 (32) $ 110,000 4,224

$ 5,368

$ (10,402)

$ 31.54 (330) $

**Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling**

**Model Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C**  **($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C** 

**w/recovery credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 4,224 $ 13,231

$ 12,503

$ 1.46 8,589 $ 15,000 4,224

$ 13,231

$ 11,047

$ 4.37 2,530 $ 40,000 4,224

$ 13,231

$ 7,408

$ 11.65 636 $ 110,000 4,224

$ 13,231

$ (2,782)

$ 32.03 (87) $

**Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling**

**Model Size (gpm)**  **TCI ($) Av**  **e. TA C**  **($/yr) Av**  **e. TA C** 

**w/recovery credits ($/yr)**  **VOC Emiss**

**Reduction (tons/yr)**  **Cost-Effect**

**($/tons)** 5,000 24,611 $ 16,689

$ 15,958

$ 1.46 10,913 $ 15,000 24,611

$ 16,689

$ 14,495

$ 4.39 3,304 $ 40,000 24,611

$ 16,689

$ 10,840

$ 11.70 927 $ 110,000 24,611

$ 16,689

$ 603

$ 32.17 19 $5000 16894.58 8135.625 7433.098 1.405054 5290.257

15000 16894.58 8135.625 6028.044 4.215163 1430.086 40000 16894.58 8135.625 2515.408 11.24043 223.7821 100000 16894.58 8135.625 -5914.92 28.10109 -210.4875000 16894.58 8135.625 7433.098 1.405054 5290.257 15000 16894.58 8135.625 6028.044 4.215163 1430.086 40000 16894.58 8135.625 2515.408 11.24043 223.7821 100000 16894.58 8135.625 -5914.92 28.10109 -210.487