alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF JENNINGS et al., Appellees.

No. 75-1885.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 1976.

Decided July 27, 1976.

*656Marie E. Klimesz, Dept, of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Washington, D.C., for appellant; Donald J. Stohr (former U.S. Atty., effective May 15th, Barry A. Short, U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo.), J. Stanley Pottinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Brian K. Landsberg and Daniel F. Rinzel, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., on briefs.

Edward K. Fehlig, Clayton, Mo., for appellee.

Before BRIGHT and HENLEY, Circuit Judges, and TALBOT SMITH, Senior District Judge.*

*

 TALBOT SMITH, Senior District Judge, Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

The United States sued the school district of the City of Jennings, Missouri (a St. Louis suburb), pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, *as amended,*42 U.S.C. § 2000e *et seq.,*alleging a pattern and practice of discrimination against black applicants for employment in faculty and staff positions. After a full trial, the district court ruled for the defendants. 399 F.Supp. 322 (E.D.Mo.1975).

Subsequent to that district court opinion, this court decided *United States v. Hazelwood School District,*534 F.2d 805 (8 Cir., 1976). In *Hazelwood,*the United States had sued the school district of the City of Hazelwood (also a St. Louis suburb) pursuant to Title VII, alleging a pattern and practice of discrimination against black applicants for employment in faculty and staff positions. This court granted relief to the United States.

The issues presented on appeal in this case are substantially identical to those in *Hazelwood,*and the facts here also seem comparable. Thus, we think it appropriate as a matter of judicial economy that the district court should reconsider this case in light of our opinion in *Hazelwood.*

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand this case to it for further consideration.1

1

. We are aware that the Hazelwood School District has indicated that it will apply to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari to review this court’s *Hazelwood*opinion. We presume that the district court in its reconsideration of *Jennings*will await exhaustion of appellate review in *Hazelwood.*
#### Lincoln D. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. A-1911.

Court of Appeals of Alaska.

March 11, 1988.

Lincoln D. Roberts, pro se.

Nancy R. Simel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Office of Sp. Prosecutions and Appeals, Anchorage, and Grace Berg Schaible, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before BRYNER, C.J., and COATS and SINGLETON, JJ.

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Judge.

Lincoln D. Roberts was convicted of robbery in the second degree and criminal trespass in the first degree. In *Roberts v. State,*680 P.2d 503 (Alaska App.1984), this court upheld his conviction and sentence. Roberts thereafter filed a *pro se*petition for *habeas corpus*with the superior court, alleging ineffective assistance on the part of both his trial and appellate counsel. The superior court treated the petition as an application for post-conviction relief. *See Knaub v. State,*443 P.2d 44 (Alaska 1968). Upon motion by the state, and after notice of intent to Roberts, the superior court summarily denied the petition. Roberts appeals, reasserting the substantive issues he raised below and, in addition, contending that the superior court erred in summarily disposing of his claims.

On appeal, the state concedes that the superior court erred in dismissing Roberts’ petition without either appointing counsel or securing an express waiver of counsel. We are obligated to make an independent determination whether the state’s concession of error is supported by the record and has legal foundation. *Marks v. State,*496 P.2d 66, 67-68 (Alaska 1972).

Roberts’ petition for *habeas corpus*was his first attempt to raise a collateral challenge to his conviction. He therefore had a right to appointed counsel upon filing the petition.1
      *Donnelly v. State,*516 P.2d 396, 399 (Alaska 1973); *Hampton v. Huston,*653 P.2d 1058, 1059-60 (Alaska App.1982). Roberts would, of course, have *508the right to proceed without the benefit of counsel, provided that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel. *See McCracken v. State,*518 P.2d 85 (Alaska 1974); *Hampton v. Huston,*653 P.2d at 1059. Here, however, no waiver of counsel appears of record, and no inquiry with respect to counsel was made by the superior court prior to dismissing the petition. The superior court’s failure to either appoint counsel for Roberts or secure an express waiver from him prior to ruling on his petition was error. *Id.*

The superior court order summarily disposing of the petition is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED. Upon remand, the superior court should appoint counsel to assist Roberts. After Roberts has had an opportunity to consult with his court-appointed counsel, the superior court should ascertain whether he wishes to proceed *pro se*and, if so, whether he is competent to do so.

. Roberts was represented by appointed counsel at trial and on direct appeal. He has been incarcerated since that time. There is nothing to suggest that his financial status has changed or that he would now be financially capable of retaining counsel.
Exhibit
      10.1

    


    Amendment
      No. 1 to 

    Consulting
      Agreement

    


    This
      Amendment No. 1 (this
      “Amendment No. 1”) to
      that
      certain Consulting Agreement
      dated
      June 20, 2006 (the “Consulting Agreement”) by and among NuWay Medical, Inc. and
      Kenneth Reay Code. Capitalized terms used herein without definitions shall
      have
      the same meanings as defined in the Consulting Agreement.

     

    1.
      The
      Parties agree that the term of the Consulting Agreement shall be extended from
      January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007. 

     

    2.
      Except
      as further modified by this Amendment No. 1, the Consulting Agreement is, and
      remains, in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

     

    In
      Witness Whereof, the Parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of December
      20, 2006.

      

    
      	
              NUWAY
                MEDICAL, INC.

            	
              CONSULTANT

            
	
               

            	
               

            
	
              By:
                /s/
                Dennis Calvert         
                                             

            	
              By:
                /s/
                Kenneth Reay Code        
                                         

            
	
                  
                President

            	
                 
                Kenneth Reay Code
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Interstate Land Investors II Limited
Partnership (the "Registrant"), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, James Christopher Boone, General Partner and Principal
Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Registrant.

                                         By: /s/ James Christopher Boone
                                             -----------------------------------

                                             James Christopher Boone
                                             President
                                             ISC Realty Corporation,
                                             General Partner and Principal
                                             Executive Officer of the Registrant

                                             April 15, 2005
Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-ELP-0759



 Exhibit 10.5 

6-1162-ELP-0759 
 United Air Lines, Inc.

 PO Box 60100 
 Chicago, IL 60666-0100

  

			
	Subject:	  	Delivery [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]
		
	 Reference:
	  	Purchase Agreement No. 3427 (Purchase Agreement) between The Boeing Company (Boeing) and United Air Lines, Inc. (Customer) relating to Model 787-8 aircraft
(Aircraft)

 This letter agreement (Letter Agreement) amends and supplements the Purchase Agreement. All terms used but not
defined in this Letter Agreement have the same meaning as in the Purchase Agreement. 
 In order to provide Customer with [CONFIDENTIAL
MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]. 
 1. Customer must provide Boeing
[CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] 
 2. Customer may
exercise [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]. For the avoidance of doubt, [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST
FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]. 
 3. [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]. Boeing will confirm [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]. Customer must confirm [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]. 
 4. [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC
PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] 
  


			
	P.A. No. 3427	 	
	Delivery_[CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]
	 BOEING / UNITED PROPRIETARY










 United Air Lines, Inc. 

6-1162-ELP-0759 
 5. [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] 
 6. Assignment. 

The rights and obligations described in this Letter Agreement are provided to Customer in consideration of Customer becoming the operator
of the Aircraft and can only be assigned, in whole or in part, pursuant to Article 9 of the AGTA as amended by Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-IRS-0184. 

7. Confidential Treatment. 

Customer and Boeing understand that certain commercial and financial information contained in this Letter Agreement are considered by
Boeing and Customer as confidential and are subject to the terms and conditions set forth in Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-IRS-0182. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	THE BOEING COMPANY
		
	By	 	 /s/ Nobuko Wiles

		
	Its	 	Attorney-In-Fact
	
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO this
		
	Date:	 	February 19, 2010
	
	UNITED AIR LINES, INC.
		
	By	 	 /s/ Kathryn A. Mikells

		
	Its	 	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  


			
	P.A. No. 3427	 	
	 Delivery_[CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT]
 BOEING / UNITED PROPRIETARY
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.49 MB)

Tags:Ginnane, Retirement, Flag Salute

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.85 MB)

Tags:Defense Supply Center Richmond, National Preparedness Month 2018

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
I. Date: March 11, 2009

II. Subject: Meeting with Industry Representative s and U.S. EPA, Sector Policies and Program Division, Metals and Minerals Group

III. Location: EPA Campus, RTP, North Carolina

IV. Attendees:

EPA Steve Fruh, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD Chuck French, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD

Gold Mine Industry Representatives Denise Kennedy, Holland and Hart Joe Beetler, Newmont Mining Corporation Greg Schoen, Round Mountain Gold Corporation Mike Tomko, Parsons Behle & Latimer Steve Barringer, Holland and Hart Andy Cole, Barrick Goldstrike Mines Inc. Melissa Barbanell, Barrick Senior Counsel, Regulatory Policy Kevin Lewis, Air Sciences Inc.

RTI International
Marvin Branscome Gabrielle Raymond

V. Discussion Items:

• A copy of the major discussion items is included in the attached agenda.

• EPA described the process for developing MACT floors and MACT and briefly

described the general status of the proposal development. EPA said they expected to complete the initial data analysis and deve lopment of preliminary draft MACT floors by the end of April.

• Industry representatives desc ribed the thermal processes us ed at gold mines, including

the ore pretreatment processes (roasters and autoclaves) used to pretreat refractory ore and carbon processes used to remove and r ecover gold (carbon kilns, electrowinning, retorts, and melt furnaces). They also described a few facilities that did not use carbon and, consequently, only had two therma l units: retorts and melt furnaces.

• Mercury test data were di scussed. Data are available for 2007 and 2008 for all of the

thermal units from stack testing required by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection. EPA is in the pr ocess of obtaining all of th e test data and performing preliminary analyses.AGENDA (3/11/2009)

Mercury Emissions from Gold Mi ne Ore Processing Facilities

Meeting with Industry Representatives and U.S. EPA, Sector Policies and Program Division, Metals and Minerals Group

Date and Time: March 11, 2009 from 1:00 pm to 4:00 pm (Eastern Time)

Location: EPA Campus, Room D201, RTP, North Carolina

Agenda



### Time Topic Presenter

1:00 to 1:10 Welcome and Introductions All

1:10 to 1:20 General Status of the Development of a Draft Proposed MACT Rule EPA Representative

1:20 to 2:05 Presentation by Industry, including: descriptions of processes; available data; possible groupings of processes; and other related topics Representative from Industry

2:05 to 2:20 Open Discussion, Qs & As All

2:20 to 2:30 Coffee Break

2:30 to 2:45 Summary of Emissions
Data and Emissions Factors EPA Representative

2:45 to 3:45 Other Issues, Open Discussion, Qs and As All
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

I D 

M.AR 0 2 2015 

DOCKET 

--------~~~--~~--~~~-------d0\5 Qd0~ In the Matter of Northeastern Aviation Corp. 

WASHINGTON, D.C. H 

2011EA110045 

Judge Not Assigned 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States 

Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 

C.F .R. § 13 .204(b ), that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney 

listed below. All communications, notices, pleadings, or documents are respectfully 

requested to be forwarded as follows: 

Daniel P. Kohlmeyer 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718 553-3266 

Facsimile: 718 995-5699 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By: 

DallieiP~ b-~ 

Attorney 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that on this day copies of the foregoing Notice of Appearance were placed 

in the United States mail, postage prepaid, Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested 

addressed as follows: 

Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott, LLC 

Evelyn D. Sahr 

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

121

h Floor 

Washington, DC 20006 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

~IF FILING BY FEDERAL EXPRESS 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Date:c?jq0P75 L},~ ~ks Paralegal Specialist 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

2
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1337 

To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the 

numerical limitations on immigrant visas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2009 

Mr. AKAKA (for himself, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. KENNEDY, and Ms. CANTWELL) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans 

from the numerical limitations on immigrant visas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Filipino Veterans 

5 Family Reunification Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM IMMIGRANT VISA LIMIT. 

7 Section 201(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(1)) is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following: 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 1337 IS

1 ‘‘(F) Aliens who are eligible for a visa under 

2 paragraph (1) or (3) of section 203(a) and who have 

3 a parent who was naturalized pursuant to section 

4 405 of the Immigration Act of 1990 (Public Law 

5 101–649; 8 U.S.C. 1440 note).’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by 
reference in this Form 10-K of our report dated April 16, 1997, (except with 
respect to the matter discussed in Note 6, as to which the date is March 6, 
1998) included in the Company's previously filed Registration Statements 
(No.'s 333-11681, 333-49733 and 333-61125) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-49731) on 
Form S-3. It should be noted that we have not audited any financial 
statements of the Company subsequent to December 31, 1996 or performed any 
audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.

                                                     ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 29, 1999