alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 468 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 468

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2014

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs.

Whereas, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 
        Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs conducted an investigation 
        into Caterpillar Inc.'s Offshore Tax Strategy;
Whereas, the Subcommittee has received a request from a federal regulatory 
        agency for access to records of the Subcommittee's investigation;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the 
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs, acting jointly, are authorized to 
provide to law enforcement officials, regulatory agencies, and other 
entities or individuals duly authorized by federal, state, or foreign 
governments, records of the Subcommittee's investigation into 
Caterpillar's Offshore Tax Strategy.
                                 <all>
```
DAVID PAYNE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 5

- 3 29 3

___________ __________________/

Opinion filed August 22, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James O. Shelfer , J udge

. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, and A. Victoria Wiggins, Assistant Public Defe nder, Tallahassee , for Appellant

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris , Assistant Attorney General , Tallahassee

, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE

, KELSEY

, and JAY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11617-11618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4388]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments and Recommendations

ACTION: 60-Day notice and request for comments. 8(a) Business 
Development Program.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to 
request approval on a new and/or currently approved information 
collection.

DATES: Submit comments on or before April 27, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments regarding whether this information 
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the function of 
the agency, whether the burden estimates

[[Page 11618]]

are accurate, and if there are ways to minimize the estimated burden 
and enhance the quality of the collection, to Sandra Johnston, Program 
Analyst, Office of Financial Assistance, Small Business Administration, 
409 3rd Street, 7th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Johnston, Program Analyst, 202-
205-7528, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#184b79767c6a7936727770766b6c7776586b7a79367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="57043639332536793d383f39242338391724353679303821">[email protected]</span></a> Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, 
202-205-7030, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c5f494e48554f124e555f547c4f5e5d125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9cffe9eee8f5efb2eef5fff4dceffefdb2fbf3ea">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The servicing agent agreement is executed by 
the borrower, certified development company and the loan servicing 
agent. The agreement is primarily used to certify use of loan proceeds, 
appoint a servicing agent and acknowledge the imposition of various 
fees.
    Title: ``Servicing Agent Agreement''.
    Description of Respondents: Certified Development Companies and SBA 
Borrowers.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Annual Responses: 7,830.
    Annual Burden: 7,830.

Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 2012-4388 Filed 2-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE ;P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Jan 15, 2009 Page 1 of 1POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORTExposure report based on revised engineering report that dropped all water releases Summary Page

Chemical ID: P090038 Reviewer: Sherer

Endpoints-Assessed Table Reasons for not assessing releases

Endpoints/Assessment Cycles 1 Releases Assessed in NCEM2? No XB Testing Required No Hazard Concern No Releases Release Below Acute Threshold 5 Release Below Chronic Threshold 5 Other

Ingestion Surface water No NA NA NA Ground water (landfill) No NA NA Consumer Use: DtD 2 No NA NA NA NA No consumer use Inhalation Air: incineration (stack) No NA Air: fugitive No NA Consumer Use: CEM 3 No NA NA NA NA No consumer use Dermal Consumer Use: CEM No NA NA NA NA No consumer use Eco Surface water: ADR conc and/or PDM 4 No NA NA NA

Consumer Use: DtD No NA NA NA NA No consumer use

1 Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model.

2 Down-the-Drain

3 Consumer Exposure Model

4 Probabilistic Dilution Model

5 The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses.

EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch = s (EAB) Initial Review Exposure Report (this report).
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 551 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 551

   Recognizing September 2014 as ``National Campus Safety Awareness 
 Month'' and supporting the goals and ideals of National Campus Safety 
                            Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 17 (legislative day, September 16), 2014

   Mr. Heller (for himself and Mr. Grassley) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 
                          Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing September 2014 as ``National Campus Safety Awareness 
 Month'' and supporting the goals and ideals of National Campus Safety 
                            Awareness Month.

Whereas people on college and university campuses are not immune from the 
        potential acts of crime that the rest of society in the United States 
        faces;
Whereas men and women deserve to learn in a positive and safe environment free 
        from sexual assault;
Whereas experts estimate that 1 in 5 female undergraduate students will 
        experience sexual assault or attempted sexual assault;
Whereas the aggressor in a sexual assault is usually an acquaintance or friend 
        of the victim;
Whereas a majority of sexual assaults are not reported to law enforcement;
Whereas the majority of stalking victims are between the ages of 18 and 24 years 
        old;
Whereas approximately 3 in 10 women are injured emotionally or psychologically 
        from being stalked;
Whereas the Clery Center for Security on Campus, a nonprofit group dedicated to 
        preventing violence, substance abuse, and other crimes on college and 
        university campuses, has designated September as ``National Campus 
        Safety Awareness Month''; and
Whereas National Campus Safety Awareness Month provides an opportunity for 
        campus communities to become engaged in efforts to improve campus 
        safety: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Campus Safety 
        Awareness Month; and
            (2) encourages colleges and universities throughout the 
        United States to provide campus safety and other crime 
        awareness and prevention programs to students throughout the 
        year.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 24.1



POWER OF ATTORNEY



The Undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Donald R. Scotty Walsh, Beth O. MacLaughlin, and Christopher D. Olander as his
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, from such person and in each persons name, place, and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all registration statements,
amendments (including post-effective amendments) to any registration statement, or, with all exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith, as well as any annual or quarterly report or any Form 3, 4 or 5 under Section 16 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be
done as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.



|                          |  |          |  |                   
|------------------------- |  | -------- |  | ------------------
|Name                      |  | Title    |  | Date              
|/s/ Edgar D. Aronson      |  | Director |  | September 20, 2004
|Edgar D. Aronson          |  |          |  |                   
|                          |  |         
|/s/ Garnett Y. Clark, Jr. |  | Director |  | September 23, 2004
|Garnett Y. Clark, Jr.     |  |          |  |                   
|                          |  |         
|/s/ George Cox            |  | Director |  | September 20, 2004
|George Cox                |  |          |  |                   
|                          |  |         
|/s/ Eugene J. Fischer     |  | Director |  | September 28, 2004
|Eugene J. Fischer         |  |          |  |                   
|                          |  |         
|/s/ W. James Hindman      |  | Director |  | September 21, 2004
|W. James Hindman          |  |          |  |                   
|                          |  |         
|/s/ Robert Post           |  | Director |  | September 21, 2004
|Robert Post               |  |          |  |                   
|                          |  |         
|/s/ Donald Scotty Walsh |  | Director |  | September 23, 2004
|Donald Scotty Walsh     |  |          |  |
#### Charles Leon BRIGMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-85-374.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 8, 1988.

*899Gloyd L. McCoy, Asst. Appellate Public Defender, Norman, for appellant.

Robert H. Henry, Atty. Gen., Susan Stewart Dickerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

The appellant, Charles Leon Brigman, was charged, tried and convicted by jury of Unlawful Possession of Marijuana With Intent to Distribute After Former Conviction of a Felony in the District Court of Bryan County in Case No. CRF-84-15. He was sentenced to ten (10) years imprisonment, and he appeals. We AFFIRM.

The appellant does not dispute the facts. He was arrested after a legal search of his mobile home on January 15, 1984. The search uncovered several baggies full of marijuana and a number of firearms. At trial, evidence of a 1972 felony driving under the influence of alcohol conviction, for which he was sentenced to two (2) years imprisonment, was admitted.

The appellant’s first assignment argues that the trial court erred by giving a jury instruction shifting the burden of proof of showing the ten (10) year limit on prior convictions set out in 21 O.S.1981, § 51(A) had been exceeded. We have long held that jury instructions are within the sound discretion of the trial court. This Court will not disturb a trial court’s decision unless it can be shown that the instructions failed to represent the applicable law of this State. *Craft v. State,*744 P.2d 210 (Okl.Cr.1987). In *Goodwin v. State,*730 P.2d 1202 (Okl.Cr.1987), this Court reaffirmed its position that the defendant must bear the burden of proof that his prior conviction is outside the ten (10) year minimum set out in 21 O.S.1981, § 51(A). *Id.*at 1204. The trial court’s instruction represented the applicable law of the State. The appellant’s first assignment is without merit.

Next, the appellant contends that his sentence was improperly enhanced by the outdated prior conviction. He relies upon an affidavit presented by the records manager of the Department of Corrections. The affidavit reflects that the appellant’s discharge from the Department of Corrections was not final until April 27, 1975. The instant crime was committed on January 14, 1984, less than nine (9) years from appellant’s discharge from the Department of Corrections. This clearly falls within the ten (10) year range set out in 21 O.S. 1981, § 51(A). There was no improper enhancement; therefore the appellant’s second assignment is without merit. Judgment and sentence are, therefore, AFFIRMED.

BRETT, P.J., and PARKS, J., concur.
<PAGE>

                                 UNITED STATES
                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                   -------


                                  FORM 10-KSB
                                 ANNUAL REPORT


                                   -------


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                                   -------


                                 CNB, Inc.


                                   -------


                                 EXHIBIT 21


<PAGE>

MARCH 1, 1998

Subsidiaries of CNB, Inc.:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                STATE OF
SUBSIDIARY                    ORGANIZATION             BUSINESS NAME
-------------------------  -------------------  ------------------------
<S>                         <C>                 <C>
1. CNB National Bank               *               CNB National Bank

* CNB National Bank is organized as a National Association.
</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.86 MB)

Tags:Kuwait City, 387th AEG, Cargo City, 386th AEW

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |

|         |                                                                                                                                                         |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                                  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                  |
|                                                             |
| Dated: August 8, 2017                                       |
|                                                             |
| /s/    Michael Hart                          |
| Michael HartChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| * | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. |
#### Paul G. SALLE, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. William B. HOWE, d/b/a Green Mountain Cemetery, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

No. 85CA1685.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

April 7, 1988.

Rehearing Denied May 26, 1988.

Lee Jay Belstock, Denver, for plaintiff-appellee, cross-appellant.

Carl F. Manthei, P.C., Carl F. Manthei, Boulder, for defendant-appellant, cross-ap-pellee.

SMITH, Judge.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred when, in an action to set aside a default judgment, it required defendant to establish, by clear and convincing evidence, the validity of his contention that he had personally not been served with process. We affirm.

*155Our supreme court twice has addressed personally the issue of the burden of proof applicable in proceedings to set aside a default judgment. In *Craig v. Rider,*651 P.2d 397 (Colo.1982) the court, citing prior case law, held that the party seeking such relief has the burden of establishing the grounds by “clear, strong and satisfactory proof.” This is tantamount to the “clear and convincing evidence” test applied in the instant case. More recently, in *Buckmiller v. Safeway Stores, Inc.,*727 P.2d 1112 (Colo.1986) the court reiterated that the burden is on the movant to establish the grounds for such relief by clear, strong and satisfactory proof. In neither case did the court refer to the 1972 statutory enactment which provides that, notwithstanding any provision of the law to the contrary, the burden of proof in any civil action shall be by a preponderance of the evidence. Section 13-25-127(1), C.R.S. (1987 Repl. Vol. 6A).

Under such circumstances, we presume that, by applying the clear and convincing standard of proof in both *Craig*and *Buck-miller*subsequent to the enactment of § 13-25-127(1), our supreme court was cognizant of that statute, but specifically chose to maintain as a matter of procedure, the higher quantum of proof, developed at common law, in proceedings to set aside default judgments.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

BABCOCK and PLANK, JJ., concur.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SIR CHARLES A. CRAWLEY, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D22-887

LT Case No. 2006-CF-4663-A-O

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed July 5, 2022

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Orange County, 

Mark S. Blechman, Judge.

Sir Charles A. Crawley, Graceville, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

COHEN, EISNAUGLE and SASSO, JJ., concur.