alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 1 to Lease and License Agreement, dated 05/28/2004



 Exhibit 10.16 

MARYLAND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER 

LICENSE AGREEMENT 

AMENDMENT 1 

This addendum is made this
28th day of May, 2004, by and between MEDCO and Neogenix
Oncology, Inc. (“Licensee”). 
 WHEREAS, MEDCO and Licensee have entered into a License Agreement dated April 28,
2004; 
 WHEREAS, Licensee currently occupies office #317 in the Maryland Technology Development Center in Montgomery County,
Maryland (the “Original Premises”); 
 WHEREAS Licensee wishes to expand into additional space within the Maryland
Technology Development Center and MEDCO is willing to provide for such expansion based on the terms provided for below; 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements stated herein, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Effective June 1, 2004, Licensee shall occupy Lab #222 (the “Expansion Premises”). 


 

	 	2.	The termination date of this License for the Expansion Premises shall be April 30, 2005, to coincide with the termination date for Licensee’s Original
Premises. 

  

	 	3.	The additional cash license payment resulting from the Expansion Premises (the “Monthly Payment”) shall be payable by Licensee in equal monthly installments,
on or before the first day of each month, and shall be as follows: 

  

				
	 6/1/04 to 4/30/05
	  	$	3,000
	 5/1/05 to 4/30/06
	  	$	3,300
	 5/1/06 to 4/30/07
	  	$	3,630

  

	 	4.	The aggregate Monthly Payment, to include the Monthly Payment for the Original Premises and the Expansion Premises provided for herein shall be as follows:


  

				
	 6/1/04 to 4/30/05
	  	$	481 + $3,000 = $3,481
	 5/1/05 to 4/30/06
	  	$	529 + $3,300 = $3,829
	 5/1/06 to 4/30/07
	  	$	582 + $3,630 = $4,212









	 	5.	Any Renewal Term provided under the License Agreement shall now be applicable to all space occupied by Licensee, including the Original Premises and the Expansion
Premises provided for herein. 

  

	 	6.	On or before the Effective Date of this Amendment, Licensee shall pay to MEDCO a sum equal to one (1) Monthly Payment for the Expansion Premises, to be held by
MEDCO as security deposit for the full, faithful and punctual performance by Licensee's terms, covenants and conditions contained herein for the full term of the License Agreement. At such time that this License Amendment commences, Licensee shall
be required to pay a sum of $3,000.00 as security deposit. 

  

	 	7.	All other provisions of the original License Agreement shall apply to this Amendment. 


This Amendment may be signed in counterparts. 
  

									
	FOR:	 	 Maryland Economic
 Development
Corporation
	  		 	FOR:	 	 Licensee
 Neogenix Oncology,
Inc.

					
	BY:	 	
 



	  		 	BY:	 	
 




		 	Scheer Partners Management, Inc. MTDC Manager	  		 		 	Director, R&D
					
	Date:	 	5/27/04	  		 	Date:	 	May 28, 2004
					
	BY:	 	 /s/ Hans Mayer
	  		 		 	
		 	 Hans Mayer
 Executive
Director, MEDCO
	  		 		 	
					
	Date:	 	Jun 7 2004	  		 		 	

  

 2
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Lounsberry Holdings III, Inc. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I,
        Mark Allen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to ss.
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/
        Mark
        Allen
 —————————————————
 Mark
        Allen
 Principal
        Executive Officer and
 Principal
        Financial Officer
 November
        14, 2005
**Exhibit      32.1**

| Signed                on this 8 day of August, 2007 | /s/                Prokopios (Akis) Tsirigakis                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                | Prokopios                (Akis) Tsirigakis                     |
|                                                | Chairman,                Chief Executive Officer and President |
|                                                | (Principal                Executive Officer)                   |
|                                                |                                                           |
|                                                |                                                           |
|                                                | /s/                George Syllantavos                          |
|                                                | George                Syllantavos                              |
|                                                | Chief                Financial Officer                         |
|                                                | (Principal                Financial Officer)                   |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

###### Finance, Budget & Program Committee of the Board of Directors; 

# DATES: 

Time and Date: 2 p.m., Thursday, February 23, 2012.

# Place: 

1325 G Street NW., Suite 800, Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.

# Status: 

 Open.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                         Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate Secretary, (202) 220-2376;                         *ehall@nw.org.*

# Agenda: 

I. Call to Order

II. Executive Session

III. Financial Report

IV. NFMC Interest Income Budget

V. Lease Update

VI. Corporate Scorecard & Dashboard

VII. NFMC & EHLP

VIII. Program Updates

IX. Adjournment

Erica Hall,

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-4274 Filed 2-21-12; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7570-02-P
340 Woodpecker Ridge

Santa Cruz, CA 95060

www.joby.aero

831.426.3733

RE: Request for Information ID: FAA-2016-5094-0009

Dear Mrs. Yvonne Barrett, Mr. Jake Troutman, Mrs. Michele Cappelle et al,

Joby Aviation has provided the information that you have requested in your RFI FAA-2016-5094-0009 in

our previous submissions, the last of which was a direct email submission to Dan Ngo in the Office of

Rulemaking, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division of the FAA, dated January 6 2017.

Joby Aviation will provide an updated document to your team in the coming days, via direct email

submission as the information that it contains is proprietary. This submission will be titled “Appendix B,”

it supersedes “Appendix A”.

Thank you for your continued assistance in processing this exemption request.

Sincerely,

Brett Goldsmith

on behalf of Joby Aviation

340 Woodpecker Ridge

Santa Cruz, CA 95060
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549



                                   ----------


                                    FORM 10-K
                                  ANNUAL REPORT



                                   ----------



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



                                   ----------



                          CNB Florida Bancshares, Inc.



                                   ----------



                                   EXHIBIT 23



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As  independent   certified  public  accountants,   we  hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation  of our  report  included  in this Form 10-K,  into the  Company's
previously filed Registration Statement File No. 333-68459.


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Jacksonville, Florida
March 27, 2002
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jerry A. Dukes, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 28, 2005



/s/    JERRY A. DUKESJerry A. Dukes Chief Executive Officer






68
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-16-00028-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF W.C.R., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 81,870

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ronnie Sue Miller and Timothy Andrew Miller timely filed a notice of appeal on April 20, 

2016. The reporter’s record was filed May 10, 2016. The clerk’s record was filed May 13, 2016. 

The Millers’ brief was due to be filed in this Court on June 13, 2016. When neither a brief nor a 

motion to extend time for filing same was received by June 28, this Court advised the Millers by 

letter dated June 28, 2016, that the brief was late. We further extended the deadline for filing the 

brief to July 13, 2016. We warned the Millers that failure to file the brief by July 13, 2016, would 

subject this appeal to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 

(c). 

We have received no responsive communication from the Millers and have not received 

their appellate brief. Having not received any response to this Court’s letter of June 28, 2016, the 

Miller’s appeal is ripe for dismissal for want of prosecution. Consequently, pursuant to Rules 38.8 

and 42.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss this appeal for want of 

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

Ralph K. Burgess

Justice

Date Submitted: August 4, 2016

Date Decided: August 5, 2016
# Un ited S tates C ourt of A ppea ls For the Seventh Ci rcui

t Chicago, Illinois 60604 June 25, 2001 Be fore Hon. W ILL IAM J. BA UER, Circuit Judge Hon. MICHA

EL S. K AN NE, Circuit Judge Hon. TER

ENCE T. EV

AN S, Circuit Judge
No. 00-2349 ROBERT BROW

N, Plaintiff- Appellant , v. ILL INOIS CE NT RAL RAI L ROA D COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
. Appeal from the Uni ted St ates District Court for the Northern Dis trict of I lli nois, Ea st er n Division. No. 97 C 4836 Charles P. K

ocoras, Judge
.
O R D E R The opin ion of this court dated June 20, 2001 i s hereb y c orrect ed. On pag e 3, first full para gr aph, t he sen tenc e readi

ng, “ Trai nm en wi th the most sen i ority at IC fi ll the regular, si

x day per week positi ons” sh

ould be del eted. On pag e 20 , first full para gr aph, li ne 8, t he wo r d “ as ” s ho uld be “w as ”. I n t he sa me paragraph, lin

e 15, the word “dis crim

in ation” sh ould be “n ondis crim in ation”. On page 21, f

irst f ull paragraph, lin

e 5, the word “rail

road” should b e l ower case. On page 23, f

oot note 12, li

ne5, the word “bri

ng” sh ould be “b rin gin g”.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

h1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147806 & (16)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147806

COA: 317052

Wayne CC: 86-673229

LARRY EUGENE WALTHALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 17, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED.
ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN THE MATTER OF THE

CONSERVATORSHIP OF:

G.R.R.,

A Protected Person.

I)A 20-0426

F"

OCT O G 2020

Bowen Greenvvooci

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of NInntana

ORDER

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with the Montana Rules of

Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellant's opening brief filed on October 5,

2020, this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the Rules and must

be resubmitted.

M. R. App. P. 10(6) requires that parties filing documents with the Clerk of the

Supreme Court shall use initials when referencing the names of parties in any proceeding

under Title 72, Chapter 5, part 3 (Guardians of Incapacitated Persons). There are

numerous references to the name of the protected person throughout the Appellant's

opening brief which must be removed and replaced by initials.

M. R. App. P. 11(3)(b) requires briefs to be double spaced. Sections of

Appellant's opening brief are not double spaced.

M. R. App. P. 12(1)(c) requires a statement of the case. The statement shall first

briefly indicate the nature of the case and its procedural disposition in the court below.

Only that procedural background which is relevant to the issue or issues raised shall be

included in the statement of the case. Appellant's opening brief does not include a

statement of the case.

M. R. App. P. 12 (1)(e) requires a staternent of the standard of review as to each

issue raised, together with a citation to authority. The standard of review section of the

Appellant's opening brief does not include citations to authority.

M. R. App. P. 12(1)(h) requires a short conclusion stating the precise relief sought.

10/06/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0426
Appellant's opening brief does not contain a short conclusion stating the precise relief

sought.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the signed original of the referenced brief be returned for

revisions necessary to comply with the specified Rules;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a signed original and nine copies of the revised

brief ordered herein be filed within ten (10) days of the date of this Order with the Clerk

of this Court and that one copy of the revised brief be served on each counsel of record;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions, or deletions other than

those specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the postage costs for returning the referenced

copies of Appellant's brief will be billed to Appellant by the Clerk of this Court and shall

be due and payable upon receipt; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained

in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to mail a true copy of this Order to Appellants

and to mail a true copy of this Order to all counsel upon whom the brief was served.

DATED this 6,41, day of October, 2020.

For the Court,

Justice
800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

October 7, 2014 

Mr. Thomas Knauff 

3523 South Eagle Valley Road 

Julian, PA 16844 

Dear Mr. Knauff: 

We apologize for the delay in responding to your letters dated November 22, 2010, and 

February 17, 2012, posted to the public docket (No. FAA-2010-1174 and FAA-2012-0181). 

You petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to initiate rulemaking to reword 

§ 91.121 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to make its meaning more clear. You 

state that the current wording allows pilots to interpret the regulation to mean if one is not 

using a “Flight Level” or “Airway” he can set his altimeter to zero for convenience – 

especially during flight training or local flying. 

On January 20, 2012, the FAA Office of the Chief Counsel responded to you with a legal 

interpretation that stated the application of § 91.121 is to all aircraft including gliders. This is 

consistent with altimeter setting guidance presented in the Glider Flying Handbook, FAA-H8083-13, Chapter 4. A copy of this letter enclosed. 

In accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73, the FAA must use the following criteria when making a 

decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition for 

rulemaking: 

1) The immediacy of the safety or security concerns you raise; 

2) The priority of other issues the FAA must deal with; and 

3) The resources we have available to address these issues. 

Each year, the FAA prioritizes its rulemaking projects based on issues that are crucial to the 

safety of the aviation community and the traveling public to ensure the FAA delivers the 

most value to the aviation system. 

After reviewing your request based on the current priorities for the FAA and the guidelines 

found in § 11.73, we determined the issue you raised does not meet the criteria to pursue 
2

rulemaking at this time. However, your comments and arguments for the proposed rule 

change in your petition will be placed in a database, which we will examine when we 

consider future rulemaking. 

If the FAA does pursue rulemaking in this area in the future, you would be able to find out 

and track it through one of the two following websites: 

 For significant rulemakings, you can find the status on the Department of 

Transportation’s (DOT) website (http://www.dot.gov/regulations/report-onsignificant-rulemakings). 

 For non-significant rulemakings, you can find the status on the DOT’s semiannual regulatory agenda, through the Office of Management and Budget’s 

(OMB) Office of Information and Regulatory Affair’s (OIRA) Unified 

Agenda website (http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain). 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Lirio Liu 

Director, Office of Rulemaking 

Enclosure
| Name      of Entity                                            |   | Jurisdiction      of Incorporation or Organization |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
| YourTravelBiz.com,      Inc.                                   |   | Delaware                                           |
| Your      Travel Biz Worldwide, Inc.                           |   | Illinois                                           |
| YourTravelBiz.com      Canada, ULC                             |   | Canada                                             |
| YourTravelBiz.com      UK, Ltd.                                |   | United      Kingdom                                |
| YTB      Air, Inc.                                             |   | Delaware                                           |
|                                                           |   |                                               |
| YTB      Travel Network, Inc.                                  |   | Delaware                                           |
| YTB      Travel Network of Illinois, Inc. (doing business |   | Illinois                                           |
| as      YTB Travel and Cruises)                                |   |                                               |
| YTB      Worldwide Travel, Inc.                                |   | Illinois                                           |
| YTB      Travel Network of Canada, ULC (operating              |   | Canada                                             |
|  as      Sunrise Travel)                                  |   |                                               |
| YTB      Travel Network UK, Ltd.                               |   | United      Kingdom                                |
| YTB      Tours, Inc.                                           |   | Delaware                                           |
|                                                           |   |                                               |
| YTB      Franchise Services, Inc.                         |   | Delaware                                           |
|                                                           |   |                                               |
| REZconnect      Technologies, Inc.                             |   | Delaware                                           |

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of
China Medicine Corporation (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)      The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
10, 2010





/s/ Senshan YangSenshan
      YangChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.