alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 10598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4195]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


BIOTECH Holdings Ltd., California Oil & Gas Corp., Central Minera 
Corp., Chemokine Therapeutics Corp., and Global Precision Medical Inc.; 
Order of Suspension of Trading

February 17, 2012.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
BIOTECH Holdings Ltd. because it has not filed any annual reports since 
the period ended March 31, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
California Oil & Gas Corp. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended August 31, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Central Minera Corp. because it has not filed any annual reports since 
the period ended June 30, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Chemokine Therapeutics Corp. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended September 30, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Global Precision Medical Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended March 31, 2007.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered, 
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended 
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on February 17, 2012, through 11:59 
p.m. EST on March 2, 2012.

    By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4195 Filed 2-17-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 29 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 29

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for the appointment of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Patricia Q. Stonesifer of 
Washington, DC, on December 21, 2013, is filled by the appointment of 
Risa Lavizzo-Mourey of Pennsylvania. The appointment is for a term of 6 
years, beginning on the later of December 22, 2013, or the date of 
enactment of this joint resolution.

            Passed the Senate January 29, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 29

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

   Providing for the appointment of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
```
From: Modi, David [ mailto:DMODI@irco.com ]

Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:54 AM

To: Cymbalsky, John

Subject: Meeting Summary

John,

On November 16, 2012, Ingersoll Rand/Trane met with the Department of Energy to discuss a proposed

Department rule on certification and enforcement of, among other products, residential and

commercial air conditioning equipment. Representing Ingersoll Rand/Trane was Jordan Doria, Jill

Hootman and David Modi. From the Department were John Cymbalsky and Ashley Armstrong.

Dave Modi

Ingersoll Rand
AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed September 25, 2015.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 1 4
- 0 1483
- CR
JEREMY DEMONE WILLIA MS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial Distri ct Court

Dallas Coun ty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 10
- 30956
- M 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Whitehill Opinion b y Justice Lang Jeremy Demone Williams appeals his conviction, following the adjudication of his guilt, for burglary of a habitation

. See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN
. § 30.02(a)(1) (West 2011) . The trial court assessed punishment at five years’ imprisonment

. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the re quirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811

– 12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1 978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he- 2

-

did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appell ate courts and counsel in Anders cases). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief

. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824,
82 6

– 2 7 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases)

. We agree the appeal is frivolous and witho ut merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/ Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 141483F.U05- 3

- 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JEREMY DEMONE WILLIA MS , Appellant No. 05

- 1 4

- 01483

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F10

- 30956

- M ). Opinion delivered by Justice Lang , Just ices Evans and Whitehill participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered this 25th of September , 2015.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.6 MB)

Tags:APS, Europe, RAF Mildenhall, LRS, Stratotanker, Training, Training, USAFE, England, Exercise, KC- 135, MAINTAIN, AMAZON, FORKLIFT, WAREHOUSE, TEAM, BUILDING, READINESS, MRSP

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
South Coast 

Air Quality Management District 

21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 

(909) 396-2000 • www.aqmd.gov 

Mr. Alex Krichevsky 

Air Pollution Specialist 

Stationary Source Division 

Air Resources Board 

1001 I Street 

P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, CA 95812 

May23,2008 

Re: SIP Submittal: Ru1e 2449 (Control of Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions from OffRoad Diesel Vehicles) 

Dear Mr. Krichevsky: 

Attached you will find information pertaining to Rule 2449 which was adopted by the 

South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Governing Board on May 2, 

2008. 

We are requesting that upon your review and concurrence the attached information be 

provided to EPA for its review and inclusion in the SIP. 

If you have any questions on this submittal, please contact Mr. Henry Hogo, Assistant 

Deputy Executive Officer - Mobile Source Division, Science and Technology 

Advancement at (909) 396-3184. 

HH:ZP 

Attachments 

Sincerely, .. Wr <:?<::2= _.., 

Elaine Chang, DrPH 7 

Deputy Executive Officer 

Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources 

SIP Completeness Checklist (Attachment I) 

Clean copy of adopted rule (Attachment 2) 

Referenced Documents (Attachment 3) 

Proof of Publication (Attachment 4) 

Signed Board Resolution/Minutes (Attachment 5) 

APCD/AQMD Rule Evaluation Form (Attachment 6) 

Staff Report (includes public comments & responses) (Attachment 7) 

cc: Andrew Steckel/EPA Region IX (w/o attachments) 

Mary Leonard/SCAQMD (w/o attachments) 

Rule 2449 (w/o attachments) 

SIP File (w/attachments)
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**SECTION1350 CERTIFICATION**

 

**In connection with this annual report of John W. Henry& Co./Millburn L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (this “Report”), I, Robert M. Alderman, Chief Executive Officer,President and Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report containing the financial statements fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 31, 2006 |   |
|----------------------|--------|

 
| By                                             | /s/ ROBERT M. ALDERMAN |   |
|------------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| Robert M. Alderman                             |
| Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                  |

 

 

----
#### Anastasia CHEHAK, Appellant, v. OKLAHOMA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, Appellee.

No. 69340.

Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2.

March 15, 1988.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 1988.

Certiorari Denied Nov. 15, 1988.

Approved For Publication by Order of the Supreme Court Dec. 1, 1988.

Brian J. Stanley, Reed, Shadid & Pipes, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Daniel J. Gamino, Daniel J. Gamino & Associates, P.C., Oklahoma City, for appel-lee.

OPINION

MEANS, Chief Judge.

Anastasia Chehak, a licensed dietician, brought this action in the District Court of Oklahoma County as an appeal from the discipline imposed on her by the Board of Medical Examiners pursuant to the Licensed Dietician Act, 59 O.S.Supp.1987 §§ 1721 through 1739. The District Court granted the Board’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, based on the statement in *State Board of Medical Examiners v. Naifeh,*598 P.2d 225 (Okla.1979), that “all appeals from a decision of the Oklahoma Board of Medical Examiners lie exclusively *1236to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.” The learned trial judge's reliance upon *Naifeh*was overly broad, and we summarily reverse.

The *Naifeh*statement was based on 59 O.S.1971 § 513, which specifically provides that license appeals of physicians and/or surgeons lie exclusively with the Oklahoma Supreme Court. Section 513 does not mention licensed dieticians. Licensure for dieticians was not placed under the Board until five years after the *Naifeh*decision.

Chehak urges that the appellate provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act, found in 75 O.S.1981 § 318, apply. Section 318 provides for appeals to the District Court. We agree.

Section 301 of the A.P.A.1 applies the provisions of the Act to any state board or agency except where specifically exempted by the Act. Nowhere in the statutes is the State Board of Medical Examiners exempt from provisions of the A.P.A., except under 59 O.S.Supp.1987 § 513, applying solely to licensing appeals of physicians and/or surgeons.

The order sustaining the Board’s motion to dismiss is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

RAPP and STUBBLEFIELD, JJ., concur.

1

. Renumbered as 75 O.S.Supp.1987 § 250.3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

JAMES BIDWELL,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 778 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12080-12081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4581]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-81,047]


Era Systems, LLC, Formerly Era Systems Corporation, a Subsidiary 
of Systems Research and Applications Corporation, Syracuse, NY; Notice 
of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated February 2, 2012, a worker requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 
applicable to workers and former workers of Era Systems, LLC, formerly 
Era Systems Corporation, a subsidiary of Systems Research and 
Applications Corporation, Syracuse, New York (hereafter referred to as 
``Era Systems, LLC'' or ``the subject firm''). The determination was 
issued on January 13, 2012 and the Department's Notice of determination 
will soon be published in the Federal Register.
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the findings that imports of services like or directly 
competitive with the services supplied by the firm have not increased; 
there has not been a shift to a foreign country of services like or 
directly competitive with the research and development services 
supplied by the firm; and there has not been an acquisition from a 
foreign country of services like or directly competitive with the 
research and development services supplied by the firm. The 
investigation also revealed that Era Systems, LLC is not a Supplier or 
Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who 
received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the 
Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a).
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner supplied new 
information regarding a possible shift to/acquisition

[[Page 12081]]

from a foreign country by the subject firm in the supply of services.
    The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements to apply for TAA.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of February, 2012.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-4581 Filed 2-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred Delgado ARELLANES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 73-2671.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 24, 1974.

*809Stephen M. Chase, Huntington Beach, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

William D. Keller, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

Before TRASK and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT, * District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Alfred D. Arellanes appeals from the refusal of the trial court to direct a commitment under the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act (NARA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 4251-4255, instead of committing him to the custody of the Attorney General.

The appellant had entered a plea of guilty to count one of a three-count indictment, which charged him with conspiring with a codefendant named Arias to distribute heroin. Overt acts included delivery of 1,037 grams of heroin and conspiring to effect future delivery of 1 kilogram of heroin. The validity of the guilty plea and conviction are not at issue.

After the plea, appellant was sent to Terminal Island by the court for a 30-day study to determine his eligibility for commitment and treatment pursuant to Title II of NARA. The conclusion of the staff after study was that appellant was an addict who would benefit from treatment under NARA.

 Between the date of the study and the final sentencing of the appellant he had testified on behalf of his codefendant and in the judgment of the trial court had committed perjury in doing so. For this announced reason and perhaps for other unannounced reasons the court refused to sentence him under NARA. Appellant contends that the favorable report of NARA makes it mandatory upon the court to sentence him under it. We disagree.

Section 4253 provides in pertinent part:

> “(a) Following the examination [authorized by NARA], if the court determines that an eligible offender is an addict and is likely to be rehabilitated through treatment, it shall commit him . . . for treatment *if*

> “(b) If, following the examination . the court determines that an eligible offender is not an addict, or is an addict not likely to be rehabilitated through treatment, it shall impose such other sentence as may be authorized or required by law.”

In our judgment the matter is clearly left to the discretion of the trial court. We find no abuse in the court’s manner of exercise of that discretion. United States v. Smothers, 451 F.2d 995, 996-997 (9th Cir. 1971).

We do not find it necessary to reach the arguments posed by the Government that under sections 4251(f)(2) and 4251(f)(4) the appellant was not an “eligible offender.”

Judgment affirmed.

*

 Honorable William B. Enriglit, United States California, sitting by designation. District Judge for the Southern District of
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.21 MB)

Tags:EUCOM, CENTCOM, AFRICOM, warfighter support, warfighter first, DLA Troop Support Europe & Africa

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                               SECTION 906 OF THE

                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Telynx, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form10-KSB for the period ended October, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 29, 2006

/s/ Beth N. Ochoa
-----------------
Beth Ochoa, Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00564-CR

MARION WASHINGTON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The motion 

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this 

motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: March 6, 2014