alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.21 MB)

Tags:Strong Partnerships; Warfighter First

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  §1350),
the undersigned, Michael E. DeDomenico, Chief Executive Officer of NuCO2 Inc., a
Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to his knowledge,
that:

The Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended June 30,  2006 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                  /s/ Michael E. DeDomenico
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Michael E. DeDomenico
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  September 13, 2006
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kevin Rich, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, DB Commodity Services
LLC (the Managing Owner), of PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kevin Rich         
|Kevin Rich             
|Chief Executive Officer

August 11, 2006



E-4
[Cite as Martin v. Woods, 121 Ohio St.3d 609, 2009-Ohio-1928.] 

MARTIN, APPELLANT, v. WOODS ET AL., APPELLEES. 

[Cite as Martin v. Woods, 121 Ohio St.3d 609, 2009-Ohio-1928.] 

Appeal from dismissal of complaint for writ of mandamus — Application of R.C. 

2731.04 and 2969.21 to 2969.27 — Judgment affirmed. 

(No. 2009-0226 ─ Submitted April 21, 2009 ─ Decided April 30, 2009.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9-08-56. 

__________________ 

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the 

complaint of appellant, Robert Martin, for a writ of mandamus. Martin did not 

bring this action in the name of the state and failed to seek leave to amend his 

complaint to comply with this R.C. 2731.04 requirement when appellees raised it. 

Rust v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections, 108 Ohio St.3d 139, 2005-Ohio-5795, 841 

N.E.2d 766, ¶ 16. Martin also did not comply with the requirements of R.C. 

2969.21 to 2969.27. See, e.g., State ex rel. Ridenour v. Brunsman, 117 Ohio 

St.3d 260, 2008-Ohio-854, 883 N.E.2d 438, ¶ 5. Notwithstanding Martin’s 

contention to the contrary, R.C. 2969.21 to 2969.27 apply to civil actions that an 

inmate commences against the state, a political subdivision, or an employee of 

those entities in the court of appeals. R.C. 2969.21(B)(1)(a). 

{¶ 2} We further deny appellant’s motion to strike appellees’ merit brief. 

Judgment affirmed. 

 MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,

O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

 Robert Martin, pro se. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

 Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Ashley Dawn Rutherford, 

Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. 

______________________
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.72 MB)

Tags:Loglines, DLA Land and Maritime, Supplier Conference and Expo

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Hon. Riley Eugene Fletcher County Attorney Navarro County Corsicana, Texas

Deer Sir: April 8, 1953
Opinion No. S-27 Re: Authority ofthe commissioners’ court to include adjacent rural territory within the election precincts for a city of more than 10,000 inhabitants. You have requested an opinion as towhether the Commissioners’ Court of Navarro County may include adjacent rural territory within any of the election precincts establishe,d for the City of CorsicanaO which has a population in excess ef 10,000 inhabitants and is divided into five wards, Inyour brief yeu have reached the conclusion that the court may not do so We agree with this conclusion.

Se,ction 13 of the Texas Etectioa Co& (Vernon’s Electiea Code, Art. .?.QS) pravidee:

“The cenmsiosieners oourt, inestablishing new eloctim precincts, shall divide any city or town into as many election precincts as they may see proper, none ofwhich shall have resident therein more than two thousand (2,SlIfJ),~ as ascertained by the vote of ahepreceding general city or town election. Every ward in every incorporated city, town or village shall constitute an election precinct, unless there shall have been cast in said ward, at the last general city or town election hsld therein, more then two thousand (2,000) votes. Cities and towns, and towns and villages incorporated under the general laws shall not necessarily constitute electien precincts. No precinct shell be made out of parts oftwo (2) wards. This Section shall not apply to cities* towns and villages of less than ten thousand (10,000) inhabitants; andp. in such cities, tewns and villages, thejustice precincts in which said cities: towns and villages are situated may be divided into election precincts without regard to thewards of such cities, towns and villages, and without reference to the number ofvotes tobe cast.” This statute requires that each ward ina city of 10,000 or more inhabitants constitute a separate, distinct ele,ction precinct or precincts, and itwould not be proper for the commissioners” court to include eitherHon. Riley Eugene 

### Fletcher, page 2 (S-27)

incorporated or unincsrperated territory outside the ward within askyef the precincts into which a particular ward is divided. While the inclmaien of other territorv would not necessarily invalidate electieas held inaccord-- ~~.~ ante with the impraperly formed precincts [Davis v. State ex rel. Wren, 75 Tex. 420, 12S.W. 

### 957(18g9); Bell v. Faulkner, 8’4Tex. 117 19 SW 

### 400(1092); Ilkpark White, 

### 33Tex. Ciim. 594-2%S.W. 542(Ai94)],‘&ertheleos &e cemmiedieners’ court is under a d&y te ebaerve the statutory requirements 

### and shanld net knowingly disregard them. 

### SUMMARY The commissieners’ ceurt should net include adjacent rural territory within the electia precincts established 

### in the wards ofa city having 10,000 or **mere** inhabitants. 

### APPROVED: Yours very truly, C. K.Richards SQfw BEN SHEPPERD Reviewe,r Atkerney Generrl WjllIs =Ea.GEcskm Reviewer 

### Robert S,Trotti First 

### Assistant JohnBemSheppard Attorney 

### General 

# w

v rrcf ‘t ’ulclc

*rY .Wall 

### Aesistaut
Order entered September 25, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 01303 - CV JOHN WILLIAMS, Appellant

V. DART TRANSIT, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No . CC - 14 - 00720 - B



### O RDER W e DENY appellant’s September 24, 2015 motion for judgment on the pleadings

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of CurrencySharesSMEuro Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Carl G. Verboncoeur, Chief Executive Officer of
Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: September 14, 2007

/s/ Carl G. VerboncoeurCarl G.
Verboncoeur*Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)

*The Registrant is a
trust and Carl G. Verboncoeur is signing in his capacity as the principal executive
officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
Order entered October 29 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00671

- CR

WILLIAM GERARD PALME R, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. F12

- 00445

- K



### O RDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to pros ecute the appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shal l determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact,

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRT Y DAYS of the date

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received,

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS
JU STICE
#### Michael N. MILLIGAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86CA0740.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

Jan. 28, 1988.

*76Michael N. Milligan, Pro Se.

Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., Terrence A. Gillespie, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for respondent-appellee.

BABCOCK, Judge.

Petitioner, Michael N. Milligan, an inmate in the custody of respondent, the Colorado Department of Institutions, appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing his C.R.C.P. 106(a)(2) petition for relief in the nature of mandamus and prohibition. He alleges that his continued medium security classification violates his rights under the due process and equal protection provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment. We conclude that the trial court did not err in dismissing the action because defendant has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. *See Gramiger v. Crowley,*660 P.2d 1279 (Colo.1983); *McDonald v. Lakewood County Club,*170 Colo. 355, 461 P.2d 437 (1969).

Where, as here, inmate classification decisions are within the discretion of Department of Corrections officials, *see*Department of Corrections Regulation No. 202-1, defendant’s particular classification implicates no liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause. *Milligan v. McGoff (Dist.*Colo. No. 86-2-1131, February 27, 1987). *See Meachum v. Fano,*427 U.S. 215, 96 S.Ct. 2532, 49 L.Ed.2d 451 (1976); *Olim v. Wakinekona,*461 U.S. 238, 103 S.Ct. 1741, 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983); *Kinney v. Young,*689 P.2d 614 (Colo.1984).

Further, because a fundamental interest is not implicated, classification decisions do not violate equal protection so long as they bear a rational relationship to a legitimate state purpose. *See Milligan v. McGoff, supra; Kinney v. Young, supra.*Here, the 80-year length of defendant’s sentence following his convictions of first degree sexual assault, second degree burglary, and forgery, the seriousness of these crimes, and his refusal to participate in recommended mental health treatment are rationally related to the state’s interest in maintaining internal prison security and offender rehabilitation. *See Milligan v. McGoff, supra; Kinney v. Young, supra.*

Judgment affirmed.

SMITH and PLANK, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,456
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                       525
<INVENTORY>                                     14,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,840
<PP&E>                                          17,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,292
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,118
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           51,268
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (32,597)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,593
<SALES>                                         52,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,728
<CGS>                                           31,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,819
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,082
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,612)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       184
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,796)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,796)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.79)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of New Source Energy Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: June 22, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Richard D. Finley  
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Richard D. Finley      
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 513 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 513

         Honoring the 70th anniversary of the Warsaw Uprising.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2014

Ms. Mikulski (for herself, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Risch, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Murphy, 
  Mr. Durbin, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Portman) submitted the 
 following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                               Relations

                             July 29, 2014

              Reported by Mr. Menendez, without amendment

                             July 31, 2014

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         Honoring the 70th anniversary of the Warsaw Uprising.

Whereas August 1, 2014, marks the 70th anniversary of the Warsaw Uprising, a 
        heroic event during World War II during which citizens of Poland, 
        against all odds, fought against the Nazi occupation of Warsaw;
Whereas, on August 1, 1944, the Polish Home Army, with limited supplies and 
        armed with mostly homemade weapons, rose up against the Nazis to fight 
        the nationwide occupation of Poland by Nazi Germany;
Whereas the Polish resistance fought German forces for 63 days, suffering 
        extreme hardship, retribution, and personal sacrifice, and during which 
        approximately 250,000 Poles were killed, wounded, or went missing;
Whereas Adolf Hitler ordered the destruction of Warsaw as punishment for the 
        uprising, leaving 85 percent of the city of Warsaw in ruins, including 
        many historical buildings and monuments;
Whereas the actions of the Polish resistance inspire people throughout the world 
        who fight for freedom and democracy; and
Whereas the actions of the Polish people during the Warsaw Uprising were a 
        significant contribution to Allied war efforts during World War II and 
        those actions continue to be respected and remembered throughout Poland: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the 70th anniversary of the 
Warsaw Uprising, which occurred during World War II and serves as a 
symbol of heroism and the power of the human spirit.
                                 <all>
```