**SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**  **NESHAP for Engine Test Cells/Stands (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart PPPPP) (Renewal)**
**1. Identification of the Information Collection 1(a) Title of the Information Collection**  NESHAP for Engine Test Cells/S tands (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart PPPPP) (Renewal) **1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract** The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Engine Test Cells/Stands were proposed on May 14, 2002 (67 FR 34547), and promulgated on May 2 7, 2003 (68 FR 28785). This standard applies to an y new or reconstructed engine test cells/stands located at major source facilities that are being used for testing internal combustion engines with a rated power of 25 horsepower (hp) or more. An engine t est cell/stand is any apparatus used for testing uninstalled stationary or uninstalled mobile (motive) engines. A plant site that is a major source of hazardous air pollutant ( HAP ) emissions emits or has the potential to emit any single HAP at a rate of 1 0 tons (9.07 megagrams) or more per year or any combination of HAP at a rate of 25 tons (22.68 megagrams) or more per ye ar. These new or reconstructed sources must be in compliance with the requirements of the engine test cells/stands NESHAP upon the star tup of a new or reconstructed engine test cell/stand. Owners and operators must submit an initial notification report upon the construction, or reconstruction of any engine test cells/stands used for testing internal combustion engines. For new or recons tructed engine test cells/stands that startup before the effective date of this subpart, the initial notification is due no later than 120 calendar day s after the effective date of the subpart. For new or reconstructed engine test cells/stands with startu p on or after the effective date of this subpart, the initial notification is due no later than 120 calendar day s after the source becomes subject to this subpart. The respondents are required to submit a semiannual compl iance report. If there were no de viation s from the emission limitation and the continuous emission monitoring s ys tem (CEMS) i s operating correctl y, the semiannual report must contain a statement b y a responsible official that no deviation occurred during the reporting period and that no C EMS or continuous parameter monitoring s ys tem (CPMS) was out of control. I f a deviation occurred from an emission limit, the report must contain detailed information of the nature of the deviation. Respondents of effected sources must submit a notificati on of compliance status, certifying that they have complied with the standard. In addition, the affected sources are required to use CEMS to monitor compliance with the standard and to conduct a performance evaluation of the CEMS. Any

owner or operator s ubject to the provisions of this part will maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such measurements,2

maintenance reports, and records. Each file will be on the site for at least two years a fter the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, report or record and off

- site for the remaining three ye ars. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority . In the event that there is no such delegated authority , the reports are sent directl y to the United States Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA) regional office. Approximately

18 respondents are currently subject to the regulation, and it is estimated that no additional respondents per ye ar will become subject to the regul ation in the next three ye ars. There are approximately 18 engine test cells/stands facilities in the United States, which are owned and operated by the engine test cells industry . None of the 18 facilities in the United States are owned b y state, local , tribal or the Federal government. They are owned and operated by privately owned for

- profit businesses. You can find the burden to the “Affected Public” listed below in Table 1: Annual Industry Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Engine Test Cells/Stands (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart PPPPP) (Renewal) . The Federal government burden does not include work performed b y Federal employees. The burden refers onl y to work performed b y contractors, which could be found listed below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden

- NESHAP for Engine Test Cells/Stands (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart PPPPP) (Renewal)

. In the development of the I CR, we addressed the O ffice of Management and Budget (OMB) “Terms of Clearance (TOC) ” on the active I CR. The TOC are as follows :

When this I CR is r enewed, EPA should review the respondent burden, universe, labor rates, and capital costs and ensure these estimates have been updated. EPA has addressed each item of concern in the TOC. The respondent burden, universe , labor rates, and capital cost have been thoroughl y checked , and all estimates updated.
**2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection**  The EPA is charged under section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each cat egory or subcategory

of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAP). These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of HAP and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction. In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any

owner or operator subject to any requirement of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports;

(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the3 Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, productio n variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonabl y require. In the Administrator's judgment, HAP emissions from engine test cells/stands cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably

be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NESHAP was promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR part 63, subpart PPPPP

. **2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data** The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard ensure compliance with the applicable regulations which were promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. In addition, the co llected information is used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings. Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility ’s initial capability to comply

with the emission standard. Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standard at all times. During the performance tests, a record of the operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor

. The notifications required in the standard are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to ensure that the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated, that leaks are being detected and repaired, and that the standards are being met. The performance test may also be observed. The information generated by the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements described in this I CR is used by the Agency

to ensure that facilities affected by the NESHAP continue to operate the control equipment in compliance with the regulation.
**3. Non**
**- duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria**  The request ed recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part 63, subpart PPPPP

. **3(a) Non**
**- duplication**  If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directly to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directl y to the delegated state or local agency . If a state or local agency has adopted their own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a cop y of the report submitted to the state or local agency can4

be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, no duplication exists. **3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB** An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this I CR was published in the Federal Regis ter ( 76 FR 26900 ) on May 9 , 201 1 . No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register

. **3(c) Consultations**
T he Agency ’s industry

experts have been consulted, and the Agency ’s internal data sources and projections of industry growth over the next three years have been considered. The primary source of information as reported b y industry , in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is the Online Tracking Information System (OTI S) which is operated and maintained by the EPA Office of Compliance. OTIS is the EPA database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of all compliance data. The growth rate for the industry is based on our consultations with the Agency ’s internal industry experts.
In dustry trade associations and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard as it was being developed. In developing this I CR, we contacted the Engine Manufacturers Association at ( 312) 82 7

- 8 7 3 4 , and the National Marine Manufacturers Association at (202) 737

- 9 7 57

. It is our policy

to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the First Federal Register Notice. **3(d ) Effects of Less Frequent Collection**  Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ens ure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequentl y, the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility

of detecting violations would be less likely

. **3(e) General Guidelines** None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of the regulations established by

OMB at 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5. These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five

- ye ar records retention requirement is consistent with the Part 70 perm it program and the five

- ye ar statute of limitations on which the permit program is based. The retention of records for five years allows EPA to establish the compliance history5

of a source, an y pattern of non

- compliance, and to determine the appropriate l evel of enforcement action. EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have violations extending beyond the five years. Without the five

- ye ar record retention, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of essential records. **3(f) Confidentiality** Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B

- Confidentiality of Business Information (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended b y 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979). **3(g) Sensitive Questions** None of the reporting or recordkeeping requirements c ontain sensitive questions. **4. The Respondents and the Information Requested 4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes**  The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are engine test cells/stands

. The United States Standard Industrial Classification (SI C) codes which correspond to the North American Industry Classification S ys tem (NAICS) codes are listed below for each source category

description. **40 CFR part 63, subpart PPPPP**  **SIC Codes NAICS Codes**  Turbine and Turbine Generator Set Units Manufacturing 3511 333611 Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing 3519 333618 All Other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing 3519 336399 Hand and Edge Tool Manufacturing 3523 332212 Lawn and Garden Tractors and Home Lawn and Garden Equipment Manufacturing 3524 333112 Hand and Edge Tool Manufacturing 3524 332212 Construction Machinery

Manufacturing 3531 333120 Farm Machinery

and Equipment Manufacturing 3559 333111 Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing 3559 333319 Speed Changers, Industrial H igh

- Speed Drives, and Gears Manufacturing 3566 333612 Motors and Generator Manufacturing 3621 335312 Automobile Manufacturing 3711 336111 Heav y Duty Truck Manufacturing 3711 3361206 **40 CFR part 63, subpart PPPPP**  **SIC Codes NAICS Codes**  Li ght Truck and Utility

Vehicle Manufacturing 3711 336112 Military Arm ored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing 3711 336992 Gasoline Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing 3714 336312 Motor Vehicle Transmission and Power Parts Manufacturing 3714 336350 Aircraft Manufacturing 3721 336411 Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences 3721 541710 Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing 3724 336412 Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences 3724 541710 Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing 3 761 336414 Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences 3761 541710 Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Propulsion Unit and Propulsion Unit Parts Manufacturing 3764 336415 Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences 3764 541710 Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation 4512 481111 Other Support Activities for Air Transportation 4581 488190 Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences 8731 541710 Testing Laboratories 8734 5 41380 Automobile Driving Schools 8299 611692 General Automotive Repair 7538 811111 Other Automotive Mechanical and Electrical Repair and Maintenance 7539 811118 Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance 7699 811310 Home and Garden Equipment Repair and Maintenance 7699 811411 Space Research and Technology 9661 927110 National Security 9711 928110 **4(b) Information Requested** None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violat e an y of the regulations established by

OMB at 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5. **(i) Data Items** In this ICR, all the data recorded or reported is required by National Emission Standards7

for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Engine Test Cells/Stands (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart PPPPP ). A source must make the following reports:
**Notifications** Initial notification 63.9345 (b), 63.5(d) , 63.9(b) Notification of compliance status 63.9345(c), 63.9(h) Notification of intent to conduct CEMS performance evaluation 63.93 45(d) , 63.8(e)(2) Initial performance evaluation 63.9320(b), 63.9345(d) , 63.8(e)(2) Notification of alternative monitoring method 63.8(f)(4) Waiver of recordkeeping or reporting requirements 63.10(f)
Additional notification 63.8(e), 63.8(f)(4), 63.8(f) (6), 63.9(b), 63.9(g)(1), 63.9(g)(2), 63.9(h), 63.9(j) Semiannual compliance report 63.9340(b), 63.9350(a), 63.9350(b), 63.9350(c), 63.9350(d), 63.10(a), 63.10(e) A source must keep the following records: **Recordkeeping** Maintain records of emission te st results and other data needed to determine compliance with emission limitation 63.9355(a)(5), 639355(a)(6), 63.9355(a)(7) Maintain records of all reports and notifications 63.9355(a), 63.9350, 63.10(b) Maintain records of applicability 63.10(b)(3) Maintain records for sources with continuous monitoring sy stems 63.9355(a)(2), 63.9355(b), 63.9355(c), 63.10(b), 63.10(c) Maintain records for initial notification and notification of compliance status 63.9355(a)(1), 63.10(b)(2)(xiv)

Electronic Reporting Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitorin g and recordkeeping at a plant site. Also, regulatory

agencies, in cooperation with the respondents, continue to create reporting s ys tems to transmit data electronicall y. However, electronic reporting s ys tems are not widely used. At this time, it is est imated that approximately 10 percent of the respondents are reporting electronicall y.8 **(ii) Respondent Activities**

**Respondent Activities** Read instructions. Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate C E MS for opacity

. Write the notifications and reports listed above. Enter information required to be recorded above. Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and sy stems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information. Develop, acquire, i nstall, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of providing information. Adjust the existing way s to comply with an y prev iously

applicable instructions and requirements. Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information. Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information. **5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Inform ation**  **Management 5(a) Agency Activities**  EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analy sis, storage, and distribution of the required information. **Agency Activities** Observe initial performance tests and repeat performan ce tests if necessary

. Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry

. Audit facility

records. Input, anal yz e, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information Sy s tem (OTI S). **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management** Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority might inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operational. Performance test repo rts are used b y the Agency to discern a source’s initial capability to compl y with the emission standard, and note the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs.9

In formation contained in the reports is entered into OTI S which is operated and maintained by

the EPA Office of Compliance. OTI S is the EPA database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government

- owned facilities. EPA uses OTI S for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement b y local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices, and EPA headquarters. EPA edits, stores, retriev es, and anal yz es the data. The records required b y this regulation must be retained by the owner or operator for five ye ars. **5(c) Small Entity Flexibility** All of the current respondents are large entities (i.e., large businesses). However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the regulation. Due to technical considerations involving the process operations and the ty pes of control equipment employed, the recordkeeping and reportin g requirements are the same for both small and large entities. The Agency considers these to be the minimum requirements needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities. To the extent that larger businesses can u se economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced. **5(d) Collection Schedule** The specific frequency

for each information collection activity within this request is shown below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden

- NESHAP f or Engine Test Cells/Stands (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart PPPPP ) (Renewal). **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection** Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this I CR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Wherever appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory

. The Agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. **6(a) Est im**  **ating Respondent Burden** The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be 3,043 (Total Labor Hours from Table 1). These hours are based on Agency studies and backgroun d documents from the development of the regulation, Agency

knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously approved ICR, and an y comments received.10

**6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs (i) Estimating Labor Costs**  Managerial $11 8

. 92 ($5 6 .6 3 + 110%) Technical $97. 78 ($46. 56 + 110%) Clerical $48. 76 ($23.2 2 + 110%) These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2010, " Table 2. Civilian Workers, by Occupational and Industry group. " The rate s are from column 1, " Total Compensation. " The rates have been increased b y 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry

. **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs** The ty pe of industry

costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standard are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. The capital/startup costs are one

- time costs when a facility becomes subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor and other costs such as photocopying and postage.

**(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs**  (A) Continuous Monitoring Device (B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent 1 (C)

Number of New Respondents (D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) (E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent (F)

Numb er of Respondents with O&M (G)

Total O&M, (E X F)

CPMS $500 0 $0 $300 18 $5,400 $0 $5,400 1 It is assumed that each new or reconstructed facility will purchase five thermocouples at a cost of $100 per thermocouple for a total cost of $500 per fa cility. The total capital/startup costs for this I CR are $0. This is the total of column D in the above table. The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for this I CR are $5,400. This is the total of column G The average annual cost for capital/ startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the IC R is estimated to be $5.000 (rounded). **6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost** The only costs to the Agency

are those costs associated with anal ys is of the reporte d11

information. The EPA compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as: the examination of records maintained by the respondents; periodic inspection of sources of emissions; and the publication and distribution of collected information.
T he average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 8,043. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rate as follows:

Managerial $62.27 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $38.92 + 60%) Technical $46.21 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $28.88 + 60%) Clerical $25.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $15.63 + 60%) These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2011 General Schedule, which excludes locality rate of pay . The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees
. Details upon which this estimate is based appear below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden

- NESHAP for Engine Test Cells/Stands (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart PPPPP ) (Renewal). **6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Tot al Burden and Costs**  Based on our research for this I CR, on average over the next three ye ars, approximately 18 respondents will be subject to the standard. It is estimated that no new respondents per ye ar will become subject to the standard. The overal l average number of respondents, as shown in the table below is 1 8 per ye ar. The number of respondents is calculated using the following table which addresses the three ye ars covered b y this I CR. **Number of Respondents**

Year (A)

Number of New Respondent s 1 (B)

Number of Existing Respondents (C)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents (E)

Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C

- D)
1 0 18 N/A 0 1 8 2 0 18 N/A 0 1 8 3 0 18 N/A 0 1 8 Average 0 18 N/A 0 1 8

1 New respondents include sources with constructed, reconstructed, and modified affected facilities. To avoid double

- counting respondents, column D is subtracted. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents o ver the three

- ye ar period of this ICR is 1 8. The total number of annual responses per ye ar is calculated using the following table:12 **Total Annual Responses** (A)
Information Collection Activity (B) Number of Respondents (C)

Number of Responses (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (E)

Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D

Com pliance status report 18 2 0 3 6 Performance evaluation report 2 1 0 2 Deviation report 1 2 0 2 Total Number of Annual Responses Total 4 0
Th e number of Total Annual Responses is 4 0

. The total annual labor costs are $ 288,361 . Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Engine Test Cells/Stands (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart PPPPP ) (Renewal). **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours Burden Hours and Cost Tables** The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectivel y, and summarized below. **(i) Respondent Tally** The total annual labor hours are 3,043 . Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Engine Test Cells/ Stands (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart PPPPP ) (Renewal). Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 76 hours per response. The total annual capital/startup and Operation and Maintenance (O&M) costs to the regulated entity are $5,000.

**(ii) The Agency Tally** The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 178 labor hours at a cost of $ 8,043 . See below Table 2: Annual Agency Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Engine Test Cells/Stands (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart PPPPP ) (Renewal). **6(f) R easons for Change in Burden**  There is no increase in the number of affected facilities or the number of responses as compared to the previous I CR. There is, however, an increase in the estimated burden cost as13

currentl y identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved Burdens. The increase is not due to any program changes. The change in burden cost is due to the use of the mo st updated labor rates. **6(g) Burden Statement** The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of informatio n is estimated to average 76 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency . This includes the time needed to review instructions; to develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; to adjust the exis ting ways to compl y with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; to train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; to search data sources; to complete and review the collection of information; and to transmit or othe rwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA = s regulations are listed at 40 CF R part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this I CR under Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 201 1

- 0 203 . An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov/ which may be used to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the content of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically . When in the sy stem, select “search” than key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, N.W ., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center Docket is (202) 566

- 1752

. Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer fo r EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 201 1

- 0 203 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0 4 8 3 in an y correspondence. **Part B of the Supporting Statement** This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this infor mation.**Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost**

**– NESHAP for**  **Engine Test Cells/Stands (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart**  **PPPPP )**  **(Renewal)**

**Burden item (A)**  **Person hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person hours per**  **respondent per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.1) (H)** 

**Total Cost Per year**  **b**

1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and studies N/A 3. Reporting requirements A. Read instructions c 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 $0 B. Notifications c Initial notifications 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of construction/reconstruction 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of anticipated startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 C. Create information See 3B D. Gather existing information See 3E E. Write report C om pliance status report d 4 2 8 18 144 7.2 14.4 $15,638.68 Performance evaluation report e 16 1 16 2 32 1.6 3.2 $3,475.26 Deviation report f 16 2 32 1 32 1.6 3.2 $3,475.26 Subtotal for Reporting Requirements 239.2 4. Recor dkeeping requirements A. Initial performance evaluation g , h, i 330 1 330 2 660 33 66 $71,677.32 B. Monitoring demonstration g , h, i 148 1 148 2 296 14.8 29.6 $33,146.20 C. Repeat performance evaluation g , h, j 330 1 330 0.4 132 6 .6 13.2 $14,335.46 D. Maintain records of CEMS performance k 1.5 50 75 18 1,350 67.5 135 $146,612.70 Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements 2,803.7 2,646 132.3 264.6 $288,360.88 **TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded)** 3,042.9 3, 043 $288,361

**Assu mptions:**  a We have assumed that the average number of existing sources subject to the rule will be 1 8

. There will be no additional new sources per year that will become subject to the rule over the three

- year period of this ICR. b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $11 8

. 92 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $97. 78 per hour for Technical labor, and $48.7 6 per hour for15 Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Departm ent of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December , 2010, Table 2. Civilian Workers, by Occupational and Industry group. The rates are from column 1, Total Compensation. The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the ben efit packages ava ilable to those employed by private industry. c We have assumed that there will be no new or reconstructed sources over the next three years. d We have assumed that compliance status reports are required semiannually. e We have assumed that 10 percent will have to write a performance evaluation report once a year. f We have assumed that one of the eighteen sources will have to w rite a deviation report. g We have assumed that all 18 sources are in compliance. h The technical persons

- hours per occurrenc e were taken from the ESD manual Table 4 “Burden of Performance Tests and Continuous Monitoring System (CMS) Demonstrations” (Volume X, Section 2.2). i We have assumed that performance evaluations and monitoring demonstrations will occur every five years. According to calculations the fifth year will fall on the first year of this renewal ICR , thus the requirements will only pertain to six facilities of the active ICR. Therefore, six facilities averaging over three years (6x3) = 2/yrs. j We have assumed that 20 percent of respondents will have to repeat the performance evaluations due to failure. k We have assumed that owners and operators will have to maintain monitoring records on a weekly basis.16 **Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burd en**  **- NESHAP for**  **Engine Test Cells/Stands (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart**  **PPPPP )**  **(Renewal)**

**Activity (A)**  **EPA person**
  ** hours per** **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per plant per year**  **(C)**

**EPA person**  **** **hours per plant per**  **year (C=AxB)**  **(D)**

**Plants per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technica l**  **person**   ** hours per** **year (E=CxD)**  **(F)**

**Managem ent**  **person -**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(Ex0.1) (H)** 

**Cost, $ b** 

1. Attend CEMS performance evaluation 32 1 32 0 0 0 0 $0 2. Repeat performance evaluation a. Retesting prep aration 12 1 12 0 0 0 0 $0 b. Attend retesting 32 1 32 0 0 0 0 $0 3. Deviation

– enforcement activities c 16 1 16 3.6 57.6 2.88 5.76 $ 2,985.10 4. Reporting requireme nts a. Review regulation 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 $0 b. Review waivers 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 $0 c. Review reports Review initial notification 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Compliance status report d , e 2 2 4 14.4 57.6 2.88 5.76 $ 2,985.10 Performance evaluation report f 2 1 2 18 36 1.8 3.6 $ 1,865.69 De viation report g 2 2 4 1 4 0.2 0.4 $ 207.29 Subtotals Labor Burden and cost 155.2 7.76 15.52 $ 8,043.18 **TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)**  178.48 178 (rounded) $ 8,043

**Assu mptions:**  a We have assumed that the average number of existing sour ces subject to the rule will be 1 8 and that no additional new sources will become subject to the rule over the three

- year period of this ICR. b This cost is based on the following labor rates w hich incorporates a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to acco unt for government overhead expenses: $62.27 Managerial rate (GS

- 13, Step 5, $38.92 x 1.6), $46.21 Technical rate (GS

- 12, Step 1, $28.88 x 1.6), and $25.01 Clerical rate (GS

- 6, Step 3, $15.63 x 1.6). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 201 1 General Schedule which excludes locality rates of pay. c We have assumed that 20 percent of respondents will be out of compliance. d We have assumed that 80 percent of respondents will be in compliance

. e Com pliance status reports review is required semiannually. f We have assumed that owners and operators are required to review performance evaluation reports once a year. g We have assumed that one respondent will have their deviation report reviewed on a semiannual basis.