FIRST DIVISION

DOYLE, C. J.,

ANDREWS, P.J., and RAY, J.

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be

physically received in our clerk’s office within ten

days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.

http://www.gaappeals.us/rules

July 14, 2016

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

A15A1933. LINCOLN & KATHERINE WILLIAMS

IRREVOCABLE TRUSTet al. v. DELIVERANCE TEMPLE

CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST OF ATLANTA.

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is from the grant of judgment on the pleadings for the plaintiff in

a declaratory judgment action over the ownership of a church property.

The plaintiff/appellee, Deliverance Temple Church of God inChrist of Atlanta,

commenced this action seeking a declaration that it owned the property upon which

it is situated. In answering the complaint, the defendants/appellants, the Lincoln &

Katherine Williams Irrevocable Trust and trustee Daryl Williams, also claimed

ownership of the subject property and by counterclaim, likewise sought a declaration

of its ownership and an order ejecting the appellee from the property. 
The appellee’s pleadingsset forth the following. In May 1997, the Greater Life

Pentecostal Church, Inc. and its trustee executed a warranty deed for the property to

Calvin Darden, Patricia Darden, and Lincoln Williams, Sr., as co-trustees of the

Deliverance Temple Church of God in Christ, Inc., a New York Corporation, as joint

tenants with a right of survivorship. On February 13, 1998, the Dardens and Williams

as co-trustees executed a deed to secure debt on the property. After the appellee

church was established, the Rev. Lincoln Williams, Sr., and his son, Daryl Williams,

served as co-pastors and conducted the church’s ministry on the subject property. 

Subsequently, Daryl Williams left the church to form his own, and Roney Hall

took his place as co-pastor. Hall became full pastor in 2008 when the Rev. Lincoln

Williams became unable to serve due to illness. On May 5, 2011, Calvin Darden,

Patricia Darden, and Lincoln Williams, Sr., asindividuals, executed a quitclaim deed

for the property to the Lincoln & Katherine Williams Irrevocable Trust. Shortly

afterwards, DarylWilliams, astrustee ofthat irrevocable trust, demanded the appellee

church to vacate the premises. Two separate dispossessory proceedings brought by

Daryl Williams and the irrevocable trust were eventually filed, but both were

ultimately dismissed. 

2
The appellee church submitted the controversy over the property ownership to

the Church of God in Christ, Inc., Judicial Review Committee/Ecclesiastical Appeals

Court on July 15, 2011. On November 29, 2012, that entity issued its decision

explaining that the national church organization required warranty deedsfor property

purchased on behalf of a member church to include a trust clause stating the property

was held in trust for the benefit of the member church. The 1997 deed in the instant

case did not comply, and so the ecclesiastical appeals court ordered the appellee to

amend the warranty deed to add such a trust clause. The appeals court also noted that

the appellee church was not associated with the Deliverance Temple Church of God

in Christ, Inc, a New York Corporation, and that the appellants failed to respond to

its requests for documentation to support their claim for the property. 

In answering the complaint, the appellants admitted the 1997 warranty deed

identified the Dardens and the Rev. Lincoln Williams, Sr. as co-trustees of the

Deliverance Temple Church of God in Christ, Inc., a New York Corporation, but

otherwise denied all other substantive allegations. 

On September 30, 2014, the trial court granted the appellee church’s motion

for judgment on the pleadings; declared the May 2011 quitclaim deed null and void;

and ordered the appellee to file a corrective deed showing itself as the proper owner.

3
Finding the appellants failed to defend the action throughout the course of the

litigation and thereby caused the appellee unnecessary expense and trouble, the trial

court also awarded the appellee $5000 attorney fees. This appeal followed.

1

1. The appellants contend the trial court erred in granting judgment on the

pleadings for the appellee, because the pleadings did not completely fail to state a

defense, or a cause of action in the counterclaim. We agree.

“[T]he granting of a motion for judgment on the pleadings under OCGA § 9-

11-12 (c) is proper only where there is a complete failure to state a cause of action or

defense.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Holland Ins. Group, LLC v. Senior Life

Ins. Co., 329 Ga. App. 834, 836 (1) (766 SE2d 187) (2014). “For purposes of the

motion, all well-pleaded material allegations of the opposing party’s pleading are to

be taken as true, and all allegations of the moving party which have been denied are

taken as false.” (Citations omitted.) Pressley v. Maxwell, 242 Ga. 360 (249 SE2d 49)

(1978).

1 This Court originally transferred the appeal to the Supreme Court, as a case

involving title to land. However, the Supreme Court transferred the case back to this

Court, explaining that the case did not involve title to land because the “appellee’s

suit below did not seek recovery of the property from appellants’ possession.”

4
In the instant case, other than admitting the 1997 warranty deed for the

property identified the Dardens and the Rev. Lincoln Williams, Sr. as co-trustees for

the Deliverance Temple Church of God in Christ, Inc., a New York Corporation, the

appellants denied all other material allegations set forth in the complaint. The

appellee argues that admission totally defeats the claim of ownership asserted by the

Lincoln & Katherine Williams Irrevocable Trust and Daryl Williams as trustee.

However, the admission doesn’t completely establish the appellee as owner either.

The decision of the ecclesiastical appeals court, relied upon by the appellee itself,

concluded the appellee Deliverance Temple Church of God in Christ of Atlanta was

not associated with the Deliverance Temple Church of God in Christ, Inc., a New

York Corporation, which wasthe grantee on the 1997 warranty deed. In short, neither

the appellee nor the appellants have pleaded an unassailable claim of ownership.

Accordingly, applying the principle stated in Pressley v. Maxwell, supra, it does not

appear the instant case was a proper one for judgment on the pleadings.

2. In light of our reversal of the judgment on the pleadings, the attorney fees

award under OCGA § 13-6-11 must be vacated. See Scarborough v. Hunter, 293 Ga.

431, 439 (3) (746 SE2d 119) (2013).

Judgment reversed. Doyle, C. J., and Ray, J., concur.

5