alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1:  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
               Officer under Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant Section 906 of
               the Sarbanes-Oxley Act


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Signal Advance, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q as well as Amendment #1 on Form 10-Q/A (the "Reports") for the quarter
ended June 30, 2015 fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



     /s/Chris M. Hymel

     Chris M. Hymel
     President/Treasurer


November 10, 2015
exv10w36a






Exhibit 10.36A




Schedule of Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Notes Issued December 31, 2008


to Holders of Series B and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock




	 	 	 	 	 
	Holder	 	Principal Amount	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Apax Excelsior VI, L.P.
	 	$	599,320.75	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Apax Excelsior VI-A, C.V.
	 	$	48,955.62	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Apax Excelsior VI-B, C.V.
	 	$	32,613.62	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Patricof Private Investment Club III, L.P.
	 	$	20,480.37	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P.
	 	$	589,672.59	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P.
	 	$	235,685.19	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Camden Partners Strategic Fund III-A, L.P.
	 	$	24,506.48	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Camden Partners Strategic Fund III-A, L.P.
	 	$	9,794.53
## NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (NOPR) TECHNICAL

SUPPORT DOCUMENT (TSD):

ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL AND

INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT:

Commercial Ice­Cream Freezers; Self­Contained Commercial Refrigerators,

Freezers, and Refrigerator­Freezers without Doors; and Remote Condensing

Commercial Refrigerators, Freezers, and Refrigerator­Freezers

August 22, 2008

U.S. Department of Energy

**Assistant Secretary** 

**Office of**  **Energy Efficiency**  **and Renewable**  **Energy**

**Building Technologies**  **Program**

**Appliances and**  **Commercial Equipment**  **Standards**

**Washington, DC**  **20585 This**  **Document was**  **prepared for**  **the Department**  **of Energy** 

**by staff**  **members of** 

**Navigant Consulting,**  **Inc.,**

**and**

**Pacific Northwest**  **National Laboratory**
October 27, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF D.J.V., A CHILD

NO. 14-15-00419-CV

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights signed 

April 15, 2015, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the 

record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below 

AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.84 MB)

Tags:mrap, 386th air expeditionary wing, 386th Expeditionary Logistics Readiness Squadron 

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
## DECISION 

## AND FINDING OFNO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FORTHEENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: FIELDTRIAL OF AN EXPERIMENTALRABIES VACCINE, HUMAN ADENOVIRUS TYPE 5 VECTOR IN WEST VIRGINIA PURPOSE OFTHE EA The United States Department ofAgriculture (USDA), Animal and PlantHealth Inspection Service, Wildlife Services (APHIS-WS) program has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), in cooperation with the U.S. Forest Service, to analyze the potential impacts to the quality ofthe human environment from conducting a field trial to determine the safety and efficacy ofan experimental rabies vaccine, human adenovirus type 5rabies glycoprotein recombinant vaccine (AdRG1.3) (USDA 2011). The EA documents the need for an AdRG1.3 field trial and assesses the potential impacts on the human environment from the two alternatives to address that need. Underthe proposed action, APHlS-WS would use federal funds to purchase AdRG1.3 oral vaccinebaits and participate with the West Virginia Departments ofAgriculture and Health and Human Resources, the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, the Greenbrier County Commission, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in field trials involving the distribution ofthe AdRG1.3 oral vaccine baits under the authorities ofthe appropriate West Virginia state agencies and to evaluate the efficacy characteristics ofthe AdRG1.3 vaccine for wildlife rabies control under limited field conditions. TheEA was prepared to: 1) evaluate the potential environmental consequences ofthe alternatives, 2) facilitate planning and interagency coordination, 3) streamline program management, and 4) clearly communicateto the public the analysis ofindividual and cumulative impacts, thereby giving the public an opportunity to participate in the decision-making process. Based onthe analysis in the final EA and the Response to Comments, I have determined thatthere will not be a significant adverse impact, individually or cumulatively, onthe quality ofthe human environment as a result ofthe proposed action. 

### AUTHORITIES Under the Act ofMarch 2,1931, as amended (7 U.S.C. 426-426b), APHlS-WS is authorized to conduct a program ofwildlife services with respectto injurious animal species; and, under the Act ofDecember 22,1987 (7 U.S.C. 426c), APHlS-WS is authorized to control nuisance mammals and birds and those mammal and bird species that are reservoirs for zoonotic diseases. 

### NEED FORACTION The vaccine currently in use by APHlS-WS' Oral Rabies Vaccination (ORV) program, vacciniarabies glycoprotein (V-RG) vaccine does notproduce sufficient levels ofpopulation immunity in striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis). As a result ofspill-overrabies infections ofskunks from raccoons (Procyon lotor), skunks may serve as a source of perpetuating and maintaining the raccoon rabies virus variant and may compromisethe effectiveness ofAPHlS-WS' ORV program. In addition, higher levels ofpopulation immunity in raccoons are desired to further APHlS-WS' 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,538
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             475
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     62,218
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        117,284
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,978
<DEPOSITS>                                     151,899
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,813
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,229
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 190,978
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,129
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,985
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   156
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,270
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,436
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,765
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,505
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       50
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,741
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,312
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,312
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       840
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.98
<LOANS-NON>                                        515
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    164
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,878
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       40
<RECOVERIES>                                       122
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,010
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,302
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            708


</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.53 MB)

Tags:Loglines, Document Services, White House, January 2019, DLA Executive Print Facility

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 131111(92) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131111 COA: 243439 Wayne CC: 02-000492-01 WILLIAM A. WILLIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 29, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it doe s not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

W EAVER , J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would reverse this Court’s September 29, 2006 order reve rsing the Court of Appeals and trial court decisions and remanding to the trial court for a new trial, and would affirm defendant’s jury convictions of second degr ee murder and felony firearm.

d0122 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2007

Clerk
AAM-10-097-E 

December 24, 2009 

 Exemption No. 9985 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-1175 

Ms. Sue Cooper 

Designated Employer Representative 

Sunshine Helicopter Tours, LLC 

1321 Apopka Airport Road, Hangar 161 

Apopka, FL 32712 

Dear Ms. Cooper: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated December 2, 2009, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Sunshine Helicopter Tours, LLC (Sunshine Helicopter Tours) for an exemption 

from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, 

would allow Sunshine Helicopter Tours, which is operating under separate parts of the 

regulation, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Sunshine Helicopter Tours. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant 

of exemption; 

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Sunshine Helicopter Tours an exemption from part 120 to 

the extent necessary to allow Sunshine Helicopter Tours, LLC which is operating under 

separate parts of the regulation, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing 

program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Sunshine Helicopter Tours are subject to the drug and alcohol 

regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Sunshine Helicopter Tours part 135 operations not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on January 31, 2012 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Dr. Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. 

Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.1


                             YTB International, Inc.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the  accompanying  Annual Report of YTB  International,
Inc. (the  "Company")  on Form  10-KSB/A for the period ended  December 31, 2004
(the  "Report"),  I,  Michael Y.  Brent,  Chairman of the Board,  President  and
Secretary of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: 8/01/2005



/s/ Michael Y. Brent

-----------------------------------------
[Signature]

Director and Chief Executive Officer
571

1

Subject: Chemistry Science Advisory Council (ChemSAC) Meeting Minutes

Meeting Date: 3 April 2013

To: HED’s Chemistry Interest Group

From: HED’s ChemSAC

Attendees: See Attached

1. Review of Minutes (03/27/2013)

Draft documents were finalized with minor revisions.

2. Review of the Analysis of Two Proposed Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Groups for 

Edible Peel and Inedible Peel. 

ChemSAC and Canada PMRA agreed with the analysis of the USDA-IR-4 petitions presented by

Dr. B. Schneider of the crop grouping focus group to establish two new tropical fruit groups 

entitled: "Tropical and subtropical fruit group - edible peel 23” and “Tropical and 

subtropical fruit group - inedible peel 24." 

The Tropical and subtropical fruit group - edible peel 23 will have 108 commodities and 

three crop subgroups. The four representative commodities are olive, fig, guava, and date.

Subgroup 23A: Tropical and Subtropical, Small Fruit, Edible Peel Subgroup - Representative 

Commodity: Olive

Subgroup 23B: Tropical and Subtropical, Medium to Large Fruit, Edible Peel Subgroup -

Representative Commodities: Fig and Guava.

Subgroup 23C: Tropical and Subtropical Palm Fruit, Edible Peel Subgroup - Representative 

Commodity: Date

The Tropical and subtropical fruit group - inedible peel 24 will have 104 commodities and 

five crop subgroups. The eight representative commodities are: atemoya or sugar apple, 

avocado, pomegranate or banana, dragon fruit, prickly pear, fruit, lychee, passionfruit; and 

pineapple.

Subgroup 24A: Tropical and Subtropical, Small Fruit, Inedible Peel Subgroup

Representative Commodity: Lychee

Subgroup 24B: Tropical and Subtropical, Medium to Large Fruit, Smooth, Inedible Peel 

Subgroup
571

2

Representative Commodities: Avocado plus Pomegranate or Banana

Subgroup 24C: Tropical and Subtropical, Medium to Large Fruit, Rough or Hairy, 

Inedible Peel Subgroup

Representative Commodities: Pineapple plus Atemoya or Sugar apple

Subgroup 24D: Tropical and Subtropical, Inedible Peel, Cactus Subgroup 

Representative Commodities: Dragon fruit and Prickly pear, fruit

Subgroup 24E: Tropical and Subtropical, Inedible Peel, Vine Subgroup

Representative Commodity: Passionfruit

ChemSAC provided some editorial comments on how to make the representative commodities 

clear and these comments were incorporated above in the crop subgroups.

Additional comments on guidance for changes in commodity definitions under reregistration 

were discussed. Future guidance will be prepared by ChemSAC members to be discussed at a 

future meeting.

All supporting documents that were submitted for review and the slide shows for this analysis 

will be stored in the ChemSAC minutes database. Also the complete list of commodities for the 

two Tropical and subtropical fruit crop groups and their individual crop subgroups are listed in 

these documents.
571

3