## 1544 S aw dust R oad, Sui te 30 1, The W oodl ands TX 77380 281.292 .0636, fax : 281 .298. 2550 ht tp:/ /w w w .denov og t.c om X 

# NIT RIC AC ID T AIL GAS UN IT NO EMISSIONS

PERFORMANCE T EST COFFEYVI LLE RESOUR CES N IT ROGEN FERT ILIZERS

COFFEYVI LLE , KANSAS

Fi nal R epor

t 4/11/ 08

DN V- 5283.03

## 1544 S aw dust R oad, Sui te 30 1, The W oodl ands TX 77380 281.292 .0636, fax : 281 .298. 2550 ht tp:/ /w w w .denov og t.c om Apr il 11, 2008

Mr . D oug R obker Cof f eyv ille Resources Nitrogen Fertiliz ers P.O. Box 5000 Coffey v il le, Kans as 67337

X 

## Re: Ni tr ic A cid T ail Gas U ni t NO Em issio ns Perf or man ce T est , C of fe y v ill e Res ou rces Ni tr og en Fer ti liz ers Faci lit y

C of fe y v ill e, K ansa s

Dear Mr. R obke r:

Enclo sed a re 3 hard co pies an d 1 cop y on CD of

the f inal test report f or the Nitric Acid

X 

## Tail Gas U nit N O Emi ss ion s P er formance Test, at t he C off ey v il le Res our ces N it ro g en Fertiliz ers f acility

locate d in Cof

f eyv ille, Kansa s. If y ou hav e any

q uest ion s o r comments , pl ease do not hes it ate t o c all me at : (2 81) 292- 0636 E x t. 14. D enov o appr eci ates thi s o ppor tuni ty and w e l ook forw ar d to cont inu ing our

su cc ess ful and las ti ng r ela ti onshi p.

S in c e re ly,

Loui s M . Es posi to

LM E/th Encl osur es

# SUM M A RY

X 3



## Den ov o Gl obal Technol og ies
, Inc . ( Den ov o) co nduct ed th e l b- NO / ton H NO Emi ss ion s Per formance Test a t t he N it ri c A ci d Tail Ga s Uni t ( NA TGU) EU -1 004, ass oci ated w it h C offey v i l l e R es ou r c es N i tr og en F er ti l i z er s ( C R N F ) p l an t op er at i on s , C offey v i l l e, Kansa s.

x 2 

## T esting w as con duct ed f or the p olluta nt Oxides of Nitrog en (NO ), d il u e n t Ox y gen (O )
alo ng w it h s tac k flo w

and mois tur e. This test w as per formed to pr ov ide doc umentati on of compl ian ce w it h re q uir ements cont ain ed in the Kans as Dep artment of H eal th and
Env ir onment ( KD HE ) oper ati ng per mit and 40 CF R 60 Sub par t G

.

T he te sting w as con duct ed o n April 04, 2 008 . Th e test proced ures we re perf orme d in

acc or dance w it h 40 CF R, Par t 60, Appen dix

A, Me thods 1, 2, and 4 for sta ck flow , al ong

2 X 

## wit h m e t h o d s 3 A 7 E f o r t h e d e t e rm in a t io n o f O a n d NO re s p e c t ive ly.

Mr . Doug Robker

of CRN F w as the p ro

jec t c oor din ator . M r. Sc ott Post ma w as pr esent for
EPA re g ion VII

. Mr . J av ier Ahumada and M r. Je re my D uis w er e pre se nt for KD HE . The
team l eader

for D enov o w as Mr . Lou is Es posi to.

Bas ed on t he resu lt s o f th is t est , t he Ni tr ic A cid T ail Gas U ni t com pl ies w it h th e

X 3 

## lb -N O / to n HN O p erf or man ce cer ti fi cat io n req ui rem ent s.

L o u i s M

. E sp o si to
Pro ject M ana ger De No v o Gl oba l Techno lo gies, Inc.

## i 

# TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE

SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................. P age -1-

SECTION 2.0 TEST METHOD AND EQUIPMENT SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . P age -2-

SECTION 3.0 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P age -3-
SECTION 3.1 EMISSION PERFORMANCE TEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P age -3-
SECTION 3.2 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ..... P age -3- 3.2.1 Sampling Instrumentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P age -3-
3.2.2 Instrumentation Calibration Procedure ............... P age -3- 3.2.3 Pollutant Sampling Procedure ..................... P age -4- 3.2.4 Pollutant Sample Data Collection and Reduction ....... P age -4- 3.2.5 Flow Sample Data Collection and Reduction .......... P age -4- SECTION 3.3 Supporting Documentation ...................... P age -5-
SECTION 3.3.1 Unit Mass Emission Determination . . . . . . . . . P age -5- SECTION 3.3.2 Ammonia Slip Determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P age -5- SECTION 3.3.3 NO vs NO2 Determination in Gas Stream . . . . . . . . . . P age -5-

Table 3-1: Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit Emission Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P age -6-

APPENDIX A - PERFORMANCE TEST DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

APPENDIX B - STACK FLOW DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

APPENDIX C - UNIT OPERATING DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

APPENDIX D - GAS CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

APPENDIX E - QUALITY ASSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

## Pag e - 1- 

# SEC TION 1.0 INT ROD UC TION

X 3 

## Deno v o con duct ed th e lb-NO / ton HNO E mission s P erf orma nce T est f or the Nitric Acid
T ail Gas Unit ope ration s a t the CRNF f acility in Co f f eyv ille, K ansa s. Th e Perf orma nce T est

ser ies w as condu cte d w hil e the uni t w as oper ati ng at a > 90% oper ati ng l oad c ondi ti on. The Perf orma nce test cond ition con sisted o f three (3) six ty min ute runs.

T he su bseque nt sect ions of this report prese nt results f or the te sts as f ollows:

Sect io n 2.0

— T est Meth od a nd Equipm ent Sum ma ry Sect io n 3.0

— Summary of Test R esul ts

T he a ppe ndice s provi d e d o c um ent ation and supp orting data . Th e ap pen dices are organiz ed a s f ollows:

A pp end ix A

— Per formance Test D ata
A pp end ix B

__ Stac k F low D ata
A pp end ix C

__ Uni t O per ati ng D ata
A pp end ix D

__ Gas C ali br ati on C erti ficat es A pp end ix E

__ Qua lity Assuran ce

## Pag e - 2-



# SECTI ON 2.0 T EST METHOD AND EQUI PMENT SUMMARY

The tes t pr og ra m w as desi g ned to pr ov ide data for document ati on of c omplian ce w ith federal re g ula ti ons ass oci ated w it h New Sour ce Per

formance Standa rd s ( NS PS) and sta te
ope rating permit requirem ent s related to the certif ica t io n o f t h e Nitric Acid Ta il Gas unit

em ission limits. Spe cif ically , testin g f or the CRNF f acility consiste d of sam pling the Nitric

2 x 

## Aci d Tail Gas U nit ex haust for O , N O , flow and mois tur e.

3 

## Cal cul ated pr oces s flo w and NH O pr oduct ion r a te s wer e c oll ect ed on the P lan t D ata Acq uis it ion Sy stem ( DA S) whic h i s mana g ed by a H oney

w ell Total D is tr ibu ti v e C ontr ol (TDC) processo r w hich com piles dat a poin ts f rom the unit into the Hone y w ell Plant History
Dat abase ( PH D) . The P HD sy ste m pr ov ide s o ne mi nute av er ag e dat a.

Other oper ati onal data i ncl uded t he fiel d det er minat ion of act ual ni tr ic ac id co n centra ti on for conv er si on to 100% aci d bas is and the a mount of ex ces s a mmonia in the v ent s tr eam by plan t person nel.

## Pag e - 3- 

# SECTI ON 3.0 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS

A s ummary

of the P er

formance Test i s g iv en i n Tabl e 3- 1

SEC TI ON 3.1 EM ISSI ON PER FO RM A NC E T EST

An Emi ss ion s p er

fo rm a n ce Test ( EPT) w as condu cte d on the N it ri c A ci d Tail Gas U nit to

X 3 

## ev alu ate t he l b- NO / ton H NO emi ss ion s r ates of the unit on A pr il 04, 2008. Thre e ( 60) minut e test run s w er e us ed to ca lc ula te t he emi ss ion and flow av er ag es for th e pr oces s u nit

. T hese av erages w ere the n com pare d w ith the allowable unit limits to dete rmine the overall

X 3 

## uni t c ompli ance. The Per formance Spec ific ati on for the uni t lb- NO / ton H NO emi ss ion s

X 3 

## ra tes s peci fies the e mis si on l ev els ca n no t ex ceed 0.8624 lb- NO / ton N HO (@1 00%

X 3 

## conc entr ati on) emi ss ion s d ur ing a 7 day ro ll ing av er ag e or 0.600 lb- NO /ton HN O ( @100%

conc entr ati on) on a 365- day r oll ing av er ag e. For

the pur pose of this tes t, the 7 day emis si on l imi t w as used to de ter mine compl ian ce.

SEC TI ON 3.2 SA MP LI NG A ND A NA LY TI CA L PR OC ED UR ES

3.2 .1 Sampl ing Instrumentation

x 2 

## The compoun ds cal ibr ated for w er e Ox ide s o f Ni tr og en (N O ) and Ox y g en (O ). The

2 

## O w as de tecte d using a Calif ornia An alytical Instru me nts Mode l 600 Pa rama gnetic

2 x 

## O anal y z er . N O anal y si s w as per formed ut il iz ing a C ali forni a Anal y ti cal Ins tr uments Mode l 600 CLD Chem ilumin escen ce an alyz er.

3.2.2 In st ru men ta ti on C alib rat io n Pro cedu re Al l anal y z er s w er e c ali br ated usi ng EPA pr otoc ol 1 g as mix tur es. Eac h anal y z er w as
z er oed w it h ul tr a- pur e ni tr og en, fol low ed by a mid and hi g h r ang e c ali br ati on sta ndar d, cor re spond ing to betw een 40% and 60% for the m id r ang e, and 100% of the a nal y z er

full sp an v alu e. For the Ni tr ic Aci d Tail Gas Uni t t he c ali br ati on r ang es

2 X X 

## w er e as follo w s: O : 0 - 10.01 %, NO : 0 - 33.6 ppm and 74.3 ppm. NO co nv erter

2 

## ef f iciency is checked using 49 ppm N0 . During the cou rse of the test se ries, the u nit

X 

## N0 co ncent ra ti on s teadi ly r ose re sul ti ng in the re- cal ibr ati on of the anal y z er

at the

X 

## compl eti on of the sec ond r un. The N0 anal y z er r ang e us ed f or

the firs t tw o runs w as 33.6 ppm and 74.3 ppm for t he final r un.

## Page -4-A system bias check was performed before and after each test run using the midrange gas mixture through the entire sampling system to check for line
contamination and leaks. Calibration correction factors were determined and used to correct the raw sample concentrations.

A system leak check was performed before and after the test series.

3.2.3 Pollutant Sampling Procedure The flue gas samples present in the exhaust stack gas were sampled and measured according to the requirements and procedures of EPA Reference Met hod 3A (O 2 

## ) and 7E (NO x 

## ). Samples were drawn from three points across the stack diameter, 16.7%, 50%, and 83.3% using a multi port probe. From the probe, the sample was then transferred through a heated line to the mobile laboratory. Upon entering the lab, the sample passed through a sev en micron filter assembly to remove particulate, a Universal Analyzer Model 1090 to remove moisture, and a manifold, used to control flow to the analyzers.

3.2.4 Pollutant Sample Data Collection and Reduction The sample data was collected and averaged on a Measurement Systems DSM Data Processor with LabTech data acquisition software. The data was collected every second, with one minute averages prin ted out. Performance testing consisted of (3), sixty minute test runs. The results from each run were then averaged together to determine the overall concentration for the system.

3.2.5 Flow Sample Data Collection and Reduction Stack flow data was collected using Methods 1, 2, and 4 found in 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, and was based on the average of three (60) minute test runs. The results from each run were then averaged together to determine the overall flow and moisture concentration for the system.

## Pag e - 5-

SECTION 3.3 Supporting Do cumentation

SECTION 3.3 .1 Unit Mass Emiss ion Determination

X 3 

## T esting w as pe rf orme d to de term ine m ass em is s io n s and lb-NO /ton HNO ( @
100 % conce ntrat ion). Mass emission a nalysis w as det ermin ed f or the o pera ting unit

X 2 

## based on t he meas ur ed s tac k flo w r ates al ong w it h N O and O co nce n tr a ti ons

X 3 

## collecte d by D e No vo

. T h e lb-NO /ton HNO f acto r is generat ed f rom th e ma ss

3 

## emis si on v alu es measur ed and the repo rt ed plant HN O produc ti on rates ( cor re cte d
to 10 0% a ci d) for t he s ame ti me frame t hat t he fiel d tes ti ng oc cur re d.

SECTION 3.3 .2 A mmonia Sli p Determination
At the end of

t h e test series, a se para te te st to de term ine th e residua l amm onia

conc entr ati on in the stack w as conduc ted byplant per sonne l. It w as obser v ed dur ing
the t est , t hat t he ammoni a c oncen tr ati on w as too l ow for a co lor

ch ang e to be
obser v ed i n the fiel d. A

su bseq uent ti tr ati on of the tes t sol uti on i n the l ab det er mined
th at t he a mmo ni a c on c en tr at i on w as a pp r ox i ma te l y 6 p pm

.

SEC TI ON 3.3. 3 N O v s N O2 D et erm in at io n in Gas St ream

X 

## At t he c oncl usi on of the tes t s er ies , t he N O analy z er w as tog g led betw een N O and

X 2 2 

## NO to det ermin e the ratio of NO to NO . It w as dem onst rated t hat t he p ercen t NO

X 

## in the g as s t re am w as less the n 2% (< 1 ppm ) of the to tal me asure d NO

conc entr ati on.

## Pag e - 6- 

# T ab l e 3- 1: N i tr i c A ci d T ai l G as U ni t E m i ssi on D at a

I nst r um ent M easur ed or C al cul at ed Per m i t ( 7 day

aver age) RUN 1 RUN 2 RUN 3 A ve r a ge

X *N O E m i s s i o n s (l b / h r) 1 0 .2 3 1 2 .4 7 2 0 .0 7 1 4 .2 6 N /A

3 N H O P ro d u c tio n R a te (to n / h r) 2 4 .5 2 4 .5 2 4 .6 9 2 4 .5 6 N /A

X 3 E m i s s i on r a t e ( l b * NO / t on NHO )

. 417

. 509

. 813 0. 58

. 8624

X A v e r a g e Me a s u r e d * N O ( p p m) 2 6 .8 2 3 1 .9 7 5 2 .9 1 3 7 .2 3 N /A

X 3 * NO / pp m - Ton o f HNO f a c t or .0 1 5 6 .0 1 5 9 .0 1 5 4 0 .0 2 N /A

2 % N O i n st ack exhaust < 2 N /A

R e s i d u a l A mmo n i a ( p p m) 6 N /A

X 2 

## * Fo r c a l c u l a t i o n p u r p o s e s , NO a s s u m e d t o b e a l l NO

# A PPEN DIX A - PE R F OR M AN C E TES T D ATA

# DeNovo-nv, Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND TESTING SERVICES

CLIENT: DATE: 04/04/08 LOCATION: PROJECT NO.: 5283.003

STATION: Unit - Model # / Serial #:

UNIT #: LOAD:

Applicable Regulations: Crew Information
40 CFR Part 60 X L. Esposito Project Mgr.:
40 CFR Part 75

Facility Representative(s) Applicable Methods EPA 1,2 & 4 X Doug Robker EPA 3a X EPA 7e X EPA 10 RM System Leak Check: in, HG Time EPA 19 Pretest - Start 17.5 7:35 Pretest - End 17.5 7:45 Applicable Standards Leak Rate (In-HG / Min) CO Nox Post Test - Start 18 13:22 PPM: N/A N/A Post Test - End 18 13:28 lb/hr: N/A N/A Leak Rate (In-HG / Min) tons/year: N/A N/A
lb/MMBtu: N/A N/A Line Temperature O F Line 1 Line 2 249.5 N/A Stack Information Stack Diameter (inches): 41.5 Chiller Temperature O C 4 Sample Point Height (feet): 45 RM Corrections % O2 Correction 0 1 6.9 % Moisture (bwa). 0 2 20.8 3 34.6 RM Sample
Wet NO X O 2 CO Dry X Component Deviation % : 0.00% 0.00% n/a Stack Stratified : No Nox Converter Check 98.78% Probe Position Settin g s ( 0.00 94.47% NH3 Plant

0.00 

## TESTING INFORMATION N/A 1544 Sawdust Road, Suite 302 The Woodlands, TX 77380

CRNF Coffeyville, KS

# DeNovo-nv, Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND TESTING SERVICES

CLIENT: CRNF DATE: LOCATION: Coffeyville, KS PROJECT NO.:

STATION: N/A UNIT - MODEL# :

UNIT #: NH3 Plant LOAD:

RM Bias RM Instrumentation Gas SPAN

Carbon Monoxide Monitor Cylinder No. Concentration Manufacturer: California Analytical SG9905181A Zero 0.00 Serial Number: 03584 Mid x Model No. 601 NDIR High

Oxygen Monitor:

Manufacturer: California Analytical SG9905181A Zero 0.00 10.00 Serial Number: 03584 EB0000169 Mid 5.10 x Model No. 601 Paramagnetic EB0006632 High 10.01

NOx Monitor: Manufacturer: California Analytical SG9905181A Zero 0.00 33.60 Serial Number: T - 02015 CC141585 Mid 18.10 x Model No. 600 CLD CC204419 High 33.60 CC204451 Recal 74.30

NO 2 Cal Gas: SD13871 49.00

SO2 Monitor: Manufacturer: SG9905181A Zero 0.00 Serial Number: Mid x Model No. High

Facility (Fd): Fuel Factor Dry (Fd): 1544 Sawdust Road, Suite 302 The Woodlands, TX 77380

>90% 04/04/08

Protocol Gases RM 

## RM INSTRUMENTATION & PROTOCOL GAS DATA 5283.003 0DeNovo-nv, Inc.ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND TESTING SERVICES1544 Sawdust Road, Suite 302The Woodlands, TX 77380CLIENT:DATE: 04/04/08LOCATION:PROJECT NO.: 5283.003STATION:UNIT - MODEL# : 0UNIT #:LOAD:Actual Analyzer Analyzer10Conc., Cma Resp., Cm Calibration% % Error, %Zero Gas 0.00 -0.02-0.20Mid Span 5.10 5.110.10xHigh Span 10.01 10.030.20Zero Gas Upscale GasInitial Final Initial FinalSystem System System System System System System SystemResponse, Bias, Response, Bias, Drift Response, Bias, Response, Bias, DriftRun No. Date Time % % of Span % % of Span % of Span % % of Span % % of Span % of Span1 4/4/2008 8:33 -0.02 0.00 0.04 0.60 0.60 5.10 -0.10 5.15 0.40 0.502 4/4/2008 9:42 0.04 0.60 0.01 0.30 -0.30 5.15 0.40 5.12 0.10 -0.303 4/4/2008 11:04 0.01 0.30 0.00 0.20 -0.10 5.12 0.10 5.11 0.00 -0.104 4/4/2008 0:00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.00 5.11 0.00 0.00 -51.10 -51.10Average Average Average Corr. GasLimits:Initial Calibration <= 4.0%Conc., Zero Bias, Upscale Bias, Conc., Bias Check <= 10.0%Run No. Date Time C, % Co, % Cm, % Cgas, % Instrument Drift <= 6.0%1 4/4/2008 8:33 3.65 0.01 5.13 3.632 4/4/2008 9:42 3.56 0.03 5.14 3.53Equations:3 4/4/2008 11:04 3.32 0.01 5.12 3.31 Bias =4 4/4/2008 0:00 0.00 0.00 2.56 0.00Drift =Run No.CalibrationError <2%System Bias< 5%Zero Drift< 3%CalibrationDrift < 3%1Pass Pass Pass Pass2Pass Pass Pass PassCgasO2=(C - Co) * Cma3Pass Pass Pass PassCm - Co4Pass Pass Pass PassCRNFCalibration Q/A Q/CBias and Drift ValuesBias Corrected ConcentrationsCalibration Correction / Bias Correction Data SheetEPA Method 3A, Excess Oxygen (O2)Span: 0 -Cal gas usedfor systembias(Final Cal. Response - Initial Cal Response) * 100%Span>90%Coffeyville, KS(System Response - Analyzer Response) * 100%SpanN/ANH3 PlantDeNovo-nv, Inc.ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND TESTING SERVICES1544 Sawdust Road, Suite 302The Woodlands, TX 77380CLIENT:DATE: 04/04/08OCATION:PROJECT NO.: 5283.003STATION:UNIT - MODEL# : 0UNIT #:LOAD:Actual Analyzer Analyzer33.6Conc., Cma Resp., Cm Calibrationppm ppm Error, %Zero Gas 0.00 0.030.09Mid Span 18.10 18.120.06xHigh Span 33.60 33.900.89Zero Gas Upscale GasInitial Final Initial FinalSystem System System System System System System SystemResponse, Bias, Response, Bias, Drift Response, Bias, Response, Bias, DriftRun No. Time ppm % of Span ppm % of Span % of Span ppm % of Span ppm % of Span % of Span1 8:33 0.06 0.1 0.00 -0.1 -0.18 18.04 -0.24 17.96 -0.48 -0.242 9:42 0.00 -0.1 0.00 -0.1 0.00 17.96 -0.48 18.22 0.30 0.773 11:04 0.00 -0.1 0.01 -0.1 0.03 33.70 -0.60 33.56 -1.01 -0.424 #REF! 0:00 0.0 -0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.03 34 45.95 0 -53.93 -99.88Equations:Bias =Average Average Average Bias Corr. O2 O2 Corr.Conc., Zero Bias, Upscale Bias, Gas Conc., Correction Gas Conc., Drift =Run No. C, ppm Co, ppm Cm, ppmCgas, ppm% COCgas, ppm1 26.66 0.03 18.00 26.82N/A26.822 31.95 0.00 18.09 31.97N/A31.97Cgas =(C - Co) * Cma3 52.95 0.01 33.63 52.91N/A52.91Cm - Co4 #REF! 0:00 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!COCgas=Run No.CalibrationError <2%System Bias< 5%Zero Drift< 3%Calibration Drift< 3%1Pass Pass Pass PassLimits:Initial Calibration <= 4.0%2Pass Pass Pass PassBias Check <= 10.0%3Pass Pass Pass PassInstrument Drift <= 6.0%4Fail Pass Pass PassCoffeyville, KSN/ACRNFNH3 Plant>90%Cal gas used forsystem biasSpan: 0 -(Final Cal. Response - Initial Cal Response) * 100%Span(System Response - Analyzer Response) * 100%Bias and Drift ValuesCalibration Correction / Bias Correction Data SheetEPA Method 7E, Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx)Bias CorrectedCgas* (20.9-O2 Correction)(20.9 - CO2gas )Corrected ConcentrationsO2 CorrectedSpanCalibration Q/A Q/C

# DeNovo-nv, Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND TESTING SERVICES

CLIENT: CRNF DATE: LOCATION: Coffeyville, KS PROJECT NO.:

STATION: N/A UNIT - MODEL# :

UNIT #: NH3 Plant LOAD:

PRETEST POST TEST PRETEST

System Response System Response System Response Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 O2 Zero -0.02 0.00 -0.02 0.04 0.01 0.00 O2 Mid 5.11 5.11 5.10 5.15 5.12 5.11 O2 High 10.03 10.03 NOx Zero 0.03 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 NOx Mid 18.12 0.00 18.04 17.96 18.22 NOx High 33.90 33.9 33.7 33.6 Nox Converter Check 48.4

Pre-Convertor Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Test Average. Run 4 O2 (%) 3.65 3.56 3.32 3.51 Nox (ppm) 26.66 31.95 52.95 37.2 CO2 (ppm) #DIV/0! Start Time 8:33 9:42 11:04 End Time 9:33 10:42 12:04

Pre-Converter 100% HNO3 Ton/hr (Rated) Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Test 4 Amb._Temp.: Deg. F 51 53 57 Amb._Press.: (In. Hg.) 29.29 29.29 29.29 Relative Humidity 42% 42% 42% Humidity Ratio (lb. Moisture / lb. Air) 0.0034 0.0036 0.0042 100% HNO3 Ton/hr Throughput 24.50 24.50 24.69

Stack Temp.: - Deg. F 325 327 325 1544 Sawdust Road, Suite 302 The Woodlands, TX 77380

04/04/08

POST TEST CALIBRATION ERROR 5283.003 0

26 

### FIELD DATA

RM CALIBRATION & BIAS DATA < 90%

OPERATING CONDITIONS Stack SYSTEM BIAS CHECK

TEST RUN CONCENTRATIONSDeNovo Global Technologies, Inc. CRNF Performance Test Date is 4-04-2008. Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizers Time O2 NOx O2 NOX Nitric Acid Process Data HH:MM:SS % PPM % PPM 7:54:16 0.01 0.02 7:55:16 0.04 0.03 A verage Acid Production (100% ) 7:56:16 5.46 0.07 Production 8.2 tons/hr 7:57:16 10.03 0.04 O2 Mid 7:58:16 9.84 0.04 7:59:16 5.25 0.03 O2 High Nitric Acid Concentration 8:00:16 5.11 0.03 Nox Zero 09:05 Sample 55.7 % 8:01:16 4.92 1.02 13:15 Sample 56.6 % 8:02:16 0.10 17.66 Average 56.15 % 8:03:16 -0.02 18.12 Nox Mid 8:04:16 -0.02 22.90 8:05:16 -0.02 33.10 O2 Zero A mmonia in Stack gas 8:06:16 -0.02 33.90 Nox High Titrated value 6 ppm 8:07:16 0.00 33.72 8:08:16 0.34 26.49 8:09:16 0.35 43.16 8:10:16 0.35 48.27 8:11:16 0.24 48.40 8:12:16 -0.01 22.67 8:13:16 2.23 2.55 8:14:16 5.09 1.58 8:15:16 5.10 0.06 O2 Mid Nox Zero 8:16:16 2.34 13.73 8:17:16 -0.02 17.67 8:18:16 -0.02 18.04 O2 Zero Nox Mid 

8:31:59 3.65 26.95 O2 NOX NITRIC ACID PRODUCTION HNO3 @ (100%) 8:32:59 3.62 26.84 % PPM lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr tons/hr 8:33:59 3.57 26.73 3.65 26.66 86576.8 48612.9 49002.2 24.50 8:34:59 3.61 26.98 86792.3 48733.9 8:35:59 3.65 27.22 86901.0 48794.9 8:36:59 3.65 26.89 87115.6 48915.4 8:37:59 3.66 26.98 87333.1 49037.6 8:38:59 3.64 26.93 87423.9 49088.5 8:39:59 3.62 26.58 87403.9 49077.3 8:40:59 3.67 26.23 87410.3 49080.9 8:41:59 3.70 26.41 87543.4 49155.6 8:42:59 3.67 26.52 87340.0 49041.4 8:43:59 3.64 26.32 87206.7 48966.5 8:44:59 3.61 26.09 87493.6 49127.7 8:45:59 3.60 26.28 87770.2 49283.0 8:46:59 3.58 26.08 88163.5 49503.8 8:47:59 3.59 25.73 88474.6 49678.5 8:48:59 3.56 25.43 88527.8 49708.4 8:49:59 3.57 25.52 88492.7 49688.6 8:50:59 3.60 25.45 88285.6 49572.4 8:51:59 3.54 25.23 87907.8 49360.3 8:52:59 3.55 25.10 87611.1 49193.6 8:53:59 3.62 25.80 87310.5 49024.8 8:54:59 3.71 26.94 87184.0 48953.8 8:55:59 3.72 26.77 87077.6 48894.1 8:56:59 3.71 26.68 87251.5 48991.7 8:57:59 3.72 26.56 87522.6 49143.9 8:58:59 3.69 26.65 87305.0 49021.7 8:59:59 3.68 26.83 86925.8 48808.8 9:00:59 3.70 26.97 86946.9 48820.7 9:01:59 3.74 27.26 87096.6 48904.7 9:02:59 3.74 27.53 87132.9 48925.1 9:03:59 3.68 26.90 86993.6 48846.9 RUN 1 HNO3 Production @ (100%) Pretest Calibration

N0x Converter Check Pretest Bias

RUN 19:04:59 3.69 26.72 86730.3 48699.0 9:05:59 3.64 26.31 86274.6 48443.2 9:06:59 3.58 26.14 85699.4 48120.2 9:07:59 3.57 25.98 85349.9 47924.0 9:08:59 3.60 26.15 85367.1 47933.6 9:09:59 3.69 26.33 85496.7 48006.4 9:10:59 3.66 26.25 85625.5 48078.7 9:11:59 3.63 25.64 85818.4 48187.0 9:12:59 3.58 25.60 86232.8 48419.7 9:13:59 3.56 25.38 86717.3 48691.8 9:14:59 3.63 25.40 86918.9 48805.0 9:15:59 3.73 25.87 87324.1 49032.5 9:16:59 3.77 26.48 87685.3 49235.3 9:17:59 3.75 26.90 88098.7 49467.4 9:18:59 3.69 26.90 88544.4 49717.7 9:19:59 3.69 27.07 88743.5 49829.5 9:20:59 3.68 27.13 88892.4 49913.1 9:21:59 3.64 27.99 89083.0 50020.1 9:22:59 3.63 28.14 89255.0 50116.7 9:23:59 3.61 27.94 89082.5 50019.8 9:24:59 3.63 28.10 88624.8 49762.8 9:25:59 3.66 28.11 88246.4 49550.3 9:26:59 3.67 28.02 87664.4 49223.6 9:27:59 3.62 27.83 87189.0 48956.6 9:28:59 3.59 27.21 86919.5 48805.3 9:29:59 3.61 26.87 86553.4 48599.8 9:30:59 3.67 27.06 86279.3 48445.8 9:31:59 3.71 27.60 86188.1 48394.6 9:32:59 3.68 27.82 86223.1 48414.3 9:33:59 3.68 27.90 86133.3 48363.9 9:34:59 3.63 27.67 9:35:59 4.51 7.11 9:36:59 5.15 0.00 O2 Mid Nox Zero 9:37:59 4.47 2.40 9:38:59 0.06 17.61 9:39:59 0.04 17.96 O2 Zero Nox Mid  9:40:37 0.03 18.11 O2 NOX 9:41:37 1.30 22.69 % PPM lb/hr tons/hr 9:42:37 3.68 30.86 3.56 31.95 86506.1 48573.2 49004.3 24.50 9:43:37 3.67 30.78 86480.5 48558.8 9:44:37 3.70 30.72 86462.1 48548.5 9:45:37 3.73 30.86 86681.7 48671.8 9:46:37 3.76 31.06 87117.4 48916.4 9:47:37 3.74 31.16 87524.8 49145.2 9:48:37 3.73 30.68 88009.9 49417.6 9:49:37 3.70 30.44 88248.3 49551.4 9:50:37 3.64 30.11 88381.5 49626.2 9:51:37 3.67 30.08 88554.9 49723.6 9:52:37 3.72 27.69 88391.5 49631.8 9:53:37 3.72 23.79 87949.1 49383.4 9:54:37 3.61 21.61 87658.1 49220.0 9:55:37 3.56 19.58 87293.8 49015.5 9:56:37 3.59 18.43 86958.5 48827.2 9:57:37 3.63 18.00 86704.1 48684.3 9:58:37 3.59 18.07 86675.9 48668.5 9:59:37 3.54 18.51 86544.3 48594.6 10:00:37 3.53 18.97 86171.2 48385.1 10:01:37 3.66 20.74 85832.6 48195.0 10:02:37 3.75 23.18 85768.1 48158.8 10:03:37 3.69 25.47 85860.9 48210.9 10:04:37 3.66 27.59 85987.1 48281.8 10:05:37 3.59 28.49 86544.9 48595.0 10:06:37 3.61 28.55 87073.8 48891.9 10:07:37 3.64 28.07 87552.1 49160.5 Post Run Bias

RUN 2 HNO3 Production @ (100%)

RUN 210:08:37 3.59 28.14 87871.5 49339.9 10:09:37 3.50 31.07 87928.7 49372.0 10:10:37 3.48 30.65 87668.5 49225.9 10:11:37 3.51 29.02 87054.4 48881.0 10:12:37 3.53 30.93 86635.1 48645.6 10:13:37 3.52 33.40 86329.4 48474.0 10:14:37 3.47 33.24 86046.3 48315.0 10:15:37 3.42 33.84 85783.0 48167.1 10:16:37 3.46 34.38 85680.3 48109.5 10:17:37 3.56 34.62 85684.7 48112.0 10:18:37 3.51 34.14 85813.9 48184.5 10:19:37 3.48 33.35 86144.3 48370.0 10:20:37 3.49 33.50 86827.8 48753.8 10:21:37 3.50 34.05 87403.6 49077.1 10:22:37 3.48 33.48 87791.9 49295.2 10:23:37 3.45 30.47 88158.5 49501.0 10:24:37 3.41 28.59 88232.9 49542.8 10:25:37 3.41 30.38 88133.9 49487.2 10:26:37 3.43 29.75 87863.1 49335.2 10:27:37 3.43 35.80 87460.6 49109.1 10:28:37 3.46 42.24 87305.2 49021.9 10:29:37 3.49 41.88 87308.5 49023.7 10:30:37 3.53 39.47 87441.7 49098.5 10:31:37 3.53 36.86 87668.5 49225.9 10:32:37 3.52 37.28 87593.2 49183.6 10:33:37 3.51 39.38 87510.0 49136.9 10:34:37 3.53 40.57 87595.7 49185.0 10:35:37 3.52 42.52 88106.4 49471.7 10:36:37 3.43 42.67 88761.1 49839.4 10:37:37 3.43 43.70 88926.8 49932.4 10:38:37 3.44 45.61 88723.8 49818.4 10:39:37 3.43 45.73 88778.7 49849.2 10:40:37 3.46 44.45 88672.1 49789.4 10:41:37 3.52 44.78 88192.5 49520.1 10:42:37 3.52 45.57 87683.2 49234.1 10:43:37 3.49 46.81 10:44:37 1.08 22.25 10:45:37 0.01 18.22 O2 Zero Nox Mid 10:46:37 2.45 9.64 10:47:37 5.12 0.00 O2 Mid Nox Zero  NOX PPM 10:49:07 0.11 0.25 Nox Zero 10:50:07 0.12 15.48 10:51:07 0.15 26.85 10:52:07 0.14 26.93 Nox Mid 10:53:07 0.13 32.77 10:54:07 0.13 34.00 10:55:07 0.11 59.39 10:56:07 0.11 77.59 Nox High 10:57:07 0.11 74.68 10:58:07 0.11 74.71 10:59:07 0.12 45.18 11:00:07 0.11 33.70 Nox Mid 11:01:07 0.11 13.10 11:02:07 0.11 0.25 Nox Zero  11:02:24 -0.02 0.00 O2 NOX 11:03:24 1.18 21.30 % PPM lb/hr tons/hr 11:04:24 3.37 62.45 3.32 52.95 87312.5 49026.0 49378.2 24.69 11:05:24 3.31 61.65 86965.4 48831.1 11:06:24 3.27 61.93 86717.3 48691.8 11:07:24 3.24 63.13 86660.4 48659.8 11:08:24 3.24 64.83 87061.3 48884.9 Pretest Run Bias

RUN 3 Post Run Bias

Nox Re-Calibration

RUN 3 HNO3 Production @ (100%)11:09:24 3.27 66.09 87316.7 49028.4 11:10:24 3.32 66.61 86938.4 48815.9 11:11:24 3.35 65.59 86634.0 48645.0 11:12:24 3.33 65.87 86325.6 48471.8 11:13:24 3.28 65.92 86023.2 48302.0 11:14:24 3.29 66.95 85844.3 48201.6 11:15:24 3.32 66.69 85948.1 48259.9 11:16:24 3.35 66.52 86420.3 48525.0 11:17:24 3.38 65.28 86866.7 48775.6 11:18:24 3.36 61.99 87544.5 49156.2 11:19:24 3.37 60.28 88559.2 49726.0 11:20:24 3.41 60.39 89502.3 50255.6 11:21:24 3.43 57.16 90424.5 50773.4 11:22:24 3.45 56.60 91002.7 51098.0 11:23:24 3.43 56.48 91045.9 51122.3 11:24:24 3.39 55.42 90501.7 50816.7 11:25:24 3.39 53.10 89403.7 50200.2 11:26:24 3.40 51.09 88008.6 49416.8 11:27:24 3.32 47.84 86686.6 48674.5 11:28:24 3.26 43.50 85609.0 48069.5 11:29:24 3.26 41.99 85164.1 47819.6 11:30:24 3.25 42.41 84985.0 47719.1 11:31:24 3.25 41.71 85118.7 47794.1 11:32:24 3.31 45.27 86108.2 48349.8 11:33:24 3.42 46.31 87248.0 48989.8 11:34:24 3.45 47.75 88350.7 49608.9 11:35:24 3.43 50.37 89351.6 50170.9 11:36:24 3.38 52.64 90037.8 50556.2 11:37:24 3.37 54.12 90333.4 50722.2 11:38:24 3.35 55.16 90431.6 50777.3 11:39:24 3.36 56.83 90238.6 50669.0 11:40:24 3.38 58.59 89715.2 50375.1 11:41:24 3.38 56.88 89029.9 49990.3 11:42:24 3.33 55.99 88500.5 49693.0 11:43:24 3.26 56.56 87926.1 49370.5 11:44:24 3.22 56.83 87213.0 48970.1 11:45:24 3.27 52.97 86841.0 48761.2 11:46:24 3.34 50.48 86684.6 48673.4 11:47:24 3.37 51.00 86612.0 48632.6 11:48:24 3.36 50.06 86715.0 48690.5 11:49:24 3.29 47.65 87150.2 48934.8 11:50:24 3.22 49.89 87611.0 49193.6 11:51:24 3.19 49.70 88042.2 49435.7 11:52:24 3.22 45.95 88199.1 49523.8 11:53:24 3.22 43.81 87970.2 49395.3 11:54:24 3.23 44.85 87571.7 49171.5 11:55:24 3.24 44.40 87306.9 49022.8 11:56:24 3.32 44.36 87499.1 49130.8 11:57:24 3.34 43.72 87865.5 49336.5 11:58:24 3.30 42.42 88165.7 49505.1 11:59:24 3.28 43.67 88751.4 49833.9 12:00:24 3.30 44.19 89155.2 50060.7 12:01:24 3.30 39.45 89495.6 50251.8 12:02:24 3.30 36.81 90045.5 50560.6 12:03:24 3.34 36.10 90540.7 50838.6 12:04:24 3.36 35.44 91032.4 51114.7 12:05:24 3.35 35.38 12:06:24 4.35 5.50 12:07:24 5.11 0.01 12:08:24 5.11 0.01 O2 Mid Nox Zero 12:09:24 4.54 2.40 12:10:24 0.03 30.63 12:11:24 0.00 33.56 O2 Zero Nox Mid  Post Run BiasWDuration00:24:3600:0000:1000:2000:3000:4000:5001:00CRNF, Unit, Pretest Calibration & Bias, 04/04/080102030405060708090100O2Trace00:00 00:10 00:20 00:30 00:40 00:50 01:00WO2 ( % )NOx (ppm)-0.02518.06O2 - Min AvgNOx Min Avg-0.02518.04SP - 1BIASONOFFBias OnWDuration00:29:4500:0000:1000:2000:3000:4000:5001:00CNRF Performance Test Run # 1 - 04/04/080102030405060708090100%ofScale00:00 00:10 00:20 00:30 00:40 00:50 01:00WO2 -( % )NOx (ppm)3.7427.30O2 - Min AvgNOx Min Avg3.7026.97SP - 1SP - 2SP - 3BIASWDuration01:08:2500:0800:1800:2800:3800:4800:5801:08CNRF Performance Test Run # 1 - 04/04/080102030405060708090100%ofScale00:08 00:18 00:28 00:38 00:48 00:58 01:08WO2 -( % )NOx (ppm)0.03418.09O2 - Min AvgNOx Min Avg0.03617.96SP - 1SP - 2SP - 3BIASWDuration00:34:3100:0000:1000:2000:3000:4000:5001:00CNRF Performance Test Run #2- 04/04/080102030405060708090100%ofScale00:00 00:10 00:20 00:30 00:40 00:50 01:00WO2 -( % )NOx (ppm)3.4233.74O2 - Min AvgNOx Min Avg3.4733.24SP - 1SP - 2SP - 3BIASWDuration01:07:1100:0700:1700:2700:3700:4700:5701:07CNRF Performance Test Run # 2 - 04/04/080102030405060708090100%ofScale00:07 00:17 00:27 00:37 00:47 00:57 01:07WO2 -( % )NOx (ppm)5.120.0072O2 - Min AvgNOx Min Avg5.120.0048SP - 1SP - 2SP - 3BIASWDuration00:09:1200:0000:1000:2000:3000:4000:5001:00CRNF, Unit, NOxRe-Calibration, 04/04/080102030405060708090100O2Trace00:0000:1000:2000:3000:4000:5001:00WO2 ( % )NOx (ppm)-0.02533.63O2 - Min AvgNOx Min Avg0.1133.70SP - 1BIASONOFFBias OnWDuration00:23:5100:0000:1000:2000:3000:4000:5001:00CNRF Performance Test Run # 3 - 04/04/080102030405060708090100%ofScale00:00 00:10 00:20 00:30 00:40 00:50 01:00WO2 -( % )NOx (ppm)3.4050.58O2 - Min AvgNOx Min Avg3.3953.10SP - 1SP - 2SP - 3BIASWDuration01:09:0900:0900:1900:2900:3900:4900:5901:09CNRF Performance Test Run # 3 - 04/04/080102030405060708090100%ofScale00:09 00:19 00:29 00:39 00:49 00:59 01:09WO2 -( % )NOx (ppm)0.002033.51O2 - Min AvgNOx Min Avg0.003033.56SP - 1SP - 2SP - 3BIAS

# A PPEN DIX B - STAC K F LOW D ATA5283.03 Unit Flow.xls Run 1 Stack Flow Worksheet

A s = ID =

π =

=

A s =  ft 2 A s =  m 2 A s =  ft 2 A s =  m 2

A s = ft 2 A s = m 2

P s = Static pressure inside the stack measured in inchesof water "H 2 O P bar = P std = Standard Barometric Pressure P cor = K flow =

K flow =( / )x x 60 = A s

K flow =( / )x x 60 = A s A rea of the Stack ( L x W ) or ( π x ( ID/2 ) 2 )

K flow scm/min

29.07 K-Flow is the flow that would exist in the stack based on the ambient pressure and the internal pressure, and corrected to standard conditions

29.07 29.92 9.393 547.65 CNRF

12:10

3.1415927 as a pre-defined constant for circular geometry inside diameter of the stack wall in inches End Time

ID

29.92 0.873 50.88 P cor P std 0.87 Tail Gas 4/4/2008 11:00

L (ength) 1 inch

2.54 cm 105.41 AREA OF THE STACK Plant Unit Date Start Time

41.50 ID L (ength) W (idth) centimeters

Ambient barometric pressure in inches of Mercury "Hg W (idth)

9.39 0.87

KINETIC FLOW IN THE STACK inches

9.39

" H 2 O

29.07 "Hg -2.95 29.29 29.92

sec/min Corrected Barometric Pressure "Hg "Hg

P cor P std sec/min K flow scf/min RUN 15283.03 Unit Flow.xls Run 1 Stack Flow Worksheet

=

=

= =

1 2 3 4 5 6 SG

mL V ic

mL x = scf V ic V k
Allowing that flue gas is composed of CO2 + O2 + N2

=

=

=

=

100 % - ( + ) =

+ += g CO 2 /mol 1.16 g O 2 /mol 26.17 g N 2 /mol 1.28 93.47 %N 2 Distribution of components of the flue gas

M d g/mol of dry flue gas 28.6092 2.9 %O 2 3.63 %CO 2 %O 2 %N 2 Dry Molecular Weight of Theoretical Flue Gas Measured Percentage of CO 2 in the Flue Gas Measured Percentage of O 2 in the Flue Gas Calculated Percentage of N 2 in the Flue Gas M d %CO 2 scm

Dry Molecular Weight

. 0.414 V w std 8.8 0.04707 0.01173 V w std 4.2

Total Volume of Water Collected 8.8

675.3 -1.2 5.2 0.6 Difference

679.5 577.7 584.0 503.4 576.5 589.2 504.0 Impinger weights in grams

Impinger # Initial Final V k Total volume of Water collected in Impinger Train Vapor Constant to correct mL of water to scf of water vapor 0.04707 V ic V w

std Volume of Water Vapor Corrected to Standard Conditions

Volume of Water Vapor in gas sample Corrected to Standard Conditions5283.03 Unit Flow.xls Run 1 Stack Flow Worksheet

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1.013 x x ( / ) = 9

Y 10 11 12

x = 13 14 15

x = 16 17 18 19 20 / ( + ) / 100 = 21 22 23 24 25

averages

=

=

=
( x ) + ( x ) = Average of the DGM inlet and outlet temperatures o F

sc f 64.0

dscf dscm/dscf V m std

V w std

Wet Molecular weight of the Flue Gas 22.318 0.028317 0.6320 dscm

0.4142

V w std 22.318 V m std 1.2647 E 1

1.82%

B ws 22.500 V dgm 529.1 P c T dgm 29.360

17.647
Ideal Gas Constan t

74.5 63.8 0.95 0.95 0.95 ∆ H " H 2 O 0.95

0.95 63.0

64.0 64.0 75.0 Inlet 73.0 Outlet DGM Temperatures o F

22.318 V m std 75.0

75.0 Dry Gas Meter Readings Initial Final

0.4142 90.500 113.000

22.5 V dgm

1.2647

E 1 T avg

P c Percentage of Moisture by Volume Volume of gas measured by the Dry Gas Meter (DGM) Dry Gas Meter Volume corrected to standard conditions

T av g corrected to standard temperature Rankin ( o F +460) Y correction Factor for DGM, Determined at calibration of DGM DGM Pressur e [(average of Delta H readings / 13.6) + P bar ] V m std

V dgm Percent Moisture by Volume of the Stack Flue Gase s

MW H2O M s P dg Percentage of dry gas in the sample. (100 % - B ws ) Wet Molecular Weight of the flue gas measured Molecular weight of water (18 g/mol) T dgm

Y B ws

1.82% MW H2O B ws 18 98.18%

P dg 28.609 M d 28.41 6 M s g/mol5283.03 Unit Flow.xls Run 1 Stack Flow Worksheet

=

=

=

= Average temperature across the stack in Rankin (T s + 460)

= T s

xx= 1 o F avg E 1 2 o F 3 o F 4 o F ( / ( x ) ) 1/2 = 5 o F 6 o F 7 o F 8 o F 9 o F 10 o F x = 11 o F 12 o F 13 o F 14 o F = fps 15 o F 16 o F = mps 17 o F 18 o F 19 o F 20 o F 21 o F 22 o F 23 o F 24 o F 25 o F
Averages

AVF =

x x=

x x= A s V s

E 1 85.48

K p

sec/min V s Flue gas velocity in feet per secon d

T s cor Pitot Tube Constant 85.48 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 Differential pressure across the Pitot Tube in inches of Water " H 2 O K p C p ∆ P

1.84 325 4.20 ∆ P 3.40 2.05 Stack Tem p

4.80 5.00 4.99 4.75 5.00 4.00

2.09 2.00 4.75 4.25 4.50 4.37 3.99 2.23 2.18 2.24

2.12 2.00 2.18 2.06

1.97 1.96 2.09 2.18 2.18

2.13 2.09 2.09 2.19 2.24 2.17 2.20 327

325 325

324

325

4.428 2.10 325.2 1.96 3.86 147.13

V s Metric 4.35 150.92 0.97 147.13 E 2 V s

4.75 4.76 Stack Gas Velocity in feet per Secon d

28.41 6 Poin t

4.35 4.83 4.54 4.73 3.89 3.85

4.37 2.1018 9 150.92 0.84 C p

9.39 T s cor 785.16 7 P cor 29.07

Actual Volumetric Flow in the stack M s 0.97 E 2

V s English

44.85

60 44.85 0.87 Actual Volumetric Flow In the Stac k

60 sec/min 147.13 V s ft 3 / min

A s AVF 2,348.16 m 3 / min 82,924.51

AVF5283.03 Unit Flow.xls Run 1 Stack Flow Worksheet

T std = T k =

x x = x 60 =

x 60 =

Q sd = P k = T std = T k =

x x x = x 60 =

x x x = x 60 =

x /= =

x x x 60 =

lb NO 2 / ton HNO 3 NO 2 /ppm-ton of HNO 3 24.50 Ton/hr HNO 3 0.417 0.0156 92,062.5 6 SVF in scm/hr 3,251,140.9 5 SVF in scf/hr

1,534.38 SVF in scm/min K flow SVF in scf/min

ng/hr NO X x10 6 = 4.6385E+12 4.64E+06 mg/hr NO X SVF scm/min P dg 1,534.38 mg/dscm NO X 51.319 98.18% Mass Per Hour Emissions of Pollutants 90,384.5 6 Q sd Nm 3 /hr 98.18% 2,348.1 6

P dg AVF T k P k Q sd Nm 3 /min 0.672 0.972 1,506.41 Dry Standard Volumetric Flow in the stack (Normal Volumetric Units)

0.672 147.132 547.6 5 54,185.6 8

T k V s Temperature correction Coefficient ( T std /T s cor)

Temperature correction Coefficient ( T std /T s cor)

P dg AVF T k P k Q sd dsft 3 /min 98.18% 0.672 0.972 3,191,900.5 8 Q sd dsft 3 /hr Standard Temperature in degrees Rankin 528 Pressure correction coefficient ( P cor

/P std )

53,198.3 4 82,924.51

Conversion of ppm to mg/Nm 3 and then to ng/Nm 3

26.82 ppm NO x 46.000 MW NO x 24.04 l/mol mg/dscm NO x 51.319 5.132E+07 ng/dscm NO x Dry Standard (Normal) Volumetric Flow Rate Standard Volumetric Flow in the Stac k
Standard Temperature in degrees Rankin 528

10.23 43.26 lb/hr NO X ton/yr NO X5283.03 Unit flow Run 2 Stack Flow Worksheet

A s = ID =

π =

=

A s =  ft 2 A s =  m 2 A s =  ft 2 A s =  m 2

A s = ft 2 A s = m 2

P s = Static pressure inside the stack measured in inchesof water "H 2 O P bar = P std = Standard Barometric Pressure P cor = K flow =

K flow =( / ) x x 60 = A s

K flow =( / ) x x 60 = A s Area of the Stack ( L x W ) or ( π x ( ID/2 ) 2 )

P cor P std sec/min K flow scm/min 29.07 29.92 0.873 50.88 P cor P std sec/min K flow scf/min K-Flow is the flow that would exist in the stack based on the ambient pressure and the internal pressure, and corrected to standard conditions

29.07 29.92 9.393 547.67 29.92 "Hg Corrected Barometric Pressure 29.07 "Hg KINETIC FLOW IN THE STAC K
-2.94 " H 2 O Ambient barometric pressure in inches of Mercury "Hg 29.29 "Hg 9.39 0.87 W (idth) inches centimeters

9.39 0.87 W (idth) 2.54 cm ID L (ength) L (ength) 41.50 ID 1 inch 105.41 14:40

AREA OF THE STAC K

inside diameter of the stack wall in inches 3.1415927 as a pre-defined constant for circular geometry Plant CNRF Unit Tail Gas Date 4/4/2008 Start Time 13:30 End Time RUN 25283.03 Unit Flow.xls Run 2 Stack Flow Worksheet

=

=

= =

1 2 3 4
5 6 SG

mL V ic

mL x = scf V ic V k
Allowing that flue gas is composed of CO2 + O2 + N2

=

=

=

=

100 % - ( + ) =

++ = 28.6052 g/mol of dry flue gas g CO 2 /mol g O 2 /mol g N 2 /mol M d %CO 2 %O 2 %N 2

1.28 1.13 26.20 2.9 3.53 93.57 Distribution of components of the flue gas %O 2 Measured Percentage of O 2 in the Flue Gas %N 2 Calculated Percentage of N 2 in the Flue Gas

M d Dry Molecular Weight of Theoretical Flue Gas %CO 2 Measured Percentage of CO 2 in the Flue Gas Dry Molecular Weight

. 6.5 0.04707 0.306 Total Volume of Water Collected 6.5

scm V w

std V w std 0.00866 717.1 722.9 5.8 608.1 608.1 0 497.6 498.3 0.7 Impinger # Initial Final Difference V ic Total volume of Water collected in Impinger Train V k Vapor Constant to correct mL of water to scf of water vapor Volume of Water Vapor in gas sample Corrected to Standard Conditions

0.04707

Impinger weights in grams

641.5 641.5 0 Volume of Water Vapor Corrected to Standard Conditions

V w

std5283.03 Unit Flow.xls Run 2 Stack Flow Worksheet

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1.013 x x ( / ) = 9

Y 10 11 12

x = 13 14 15

x = 16 17 18 19 20 / ( + ) / 100 = 21 22 23 24 25

averages

=

=

=
( x ) + ( x ) = Average of the DGM inlet and outlet temperatures o F

scf 0.94 75.0 74.0

dscf dscm/dscf V m std 35.300 0.028317 0.9996 dscm

28.514 g/mol P dg M d B ws MW H2O M s MW H2O Molecular weight of water (18 g/mol)

99.14% 28.605 0.86% 18 P dg Percentage of dry gas in the sample. (100 % - B ws ) M s Wet Molecular Weight of the flue gas measured 74.5 73.0 0.94
Wet Molecular weight of the Flue Gas 75.0 74.0 0.94 V w

std V w std V m std B ws 0.3060 0.3060 35 0.86% 74.0 E 1 Ideal Gas Constan t V m std 2.0004 17.647 35.300 75.0 0.94 V dgm P c T dgm E 1 35.900 29.359 533.8 2.0004 V dgm 35.9 0.94 113.100 149.000 73.0 70.0

Dry Gas Meter Readings DGM Temperatures o F ∆ H Initial Final Inlet Outlet " H 2 O Y Y correction Factor for DGM, Determined at calibration of DGM P c DGM Pressure[(average of Delta H readings / 13.6) + P bar ] V m std Dry Gas Meter Volume corrected to standard conditions

T avg T dgm T av g corrected to standard temperature Rankin ( o F +460) Percent Moisture by Volume of the Stack Flue Gases

B ws Percentage of Moisture by Volume V dgm Volume of gas measured by the Dry Gas Meter (DGM)5283.03 Unit Flow.xls Run 2 Stack Flow Worksheet

=

=

=

= Average temperature across the stack in Rankin (T s + 460)

= T s

xx= 1 o F avg E 1 2 o F 3 o F 4 o F ( / ( x ) ) 1/2 = 5 o F 6 o F 7 o F 8 o F 9 o F 10 o F x = 11 o F 12 o F 13 o F 14 o F = fps 15 o F 16 o F = mps 17 o F 18 o F 19 o F 20 o F 21 o F 22 o F 23 o F 24 o F 25 o F
Averages

AVF =

x x=

x x= m 3 /min sec/min V s A s AVF

60 45.48 0.87 2,381.41 ft 3 /min sec/min V s A s AVF Actual Volumetric Flow In the Stack

Actual Volumetric Flow in the stack

60 149.22 9.39 84,098.86 4.560 2.13 326.0 4.21 2.05 3.72 1.93 325 4.75 2.18 4.51 2.12 4.68 2.16 4.53 2.13 4.75 2.18 V s Metric 45.48 4.59 2.14 4.68 2.16 V s English 149.22 4.60 2.14 4.99 2.23 326 4.54 2.13 E 1 E 2 V s 4.85 2.20 326 153.24 0.97 149.22 5.00 4.90 2.21

2.24 4.88 2.21 4.44 2.11 4.38 2.09 4.72 2.17 T s cor P cor M s E 2 4.00 2.00 786 29.07 28.514 0.97 4.81 2.19 4.11 2.03 2.09 327 K p C p 4.46 2.11 85.48 0.84 2.13423 153.24 Point ∆ P 4.35 Stack Temp ∆ P Differential pressure across the Pitot Tube in inches of Water "H 2 O T s co r

V s Stack Gas Velocity in feet per Second Flue gas velocity in feet per second

K p Pitot Tube Constant 85.48 C p Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.845283.03 Unit Flow.xls Run 2 Stack Flow Worksheet

T std = T k =

x x = x 60 =

x 60 =

Q sd = P k = T std = T k =

x x x = x 60 =

x x x = x 60 =

x/= =

x x x 60 =

lb NO 2 / ton HNO 3 NO 2 /ppm-ton of HNO 3 1,554.49 93,269.69 SVF in scm/min SVF in scm/hr 3,293,770.15 T k V s K flow SVF in scf/min SVF in scf/hr Standard Volumetric Flow in the Stack

Standard Temperature in degrees Rankin 528 Temperature correction Coefficient (T std /T s cor)

0.672 149.216 547.67 54,896.17

x10 6 = 5.6566E+12 ng/hr NO x mg/dscm NO x P dg SVF scm/min mg/hr NO x

61.174 99.14% 1,554.49 5.66E+06 Mass Per Hour Emissions of Pollutants 6.117E+07 ppm NO x MW NO x l/mol mg/dscm NO x ng/dscm NO x

31.97 46.000 24.04 61.174 Conversion of ppm to mg/Nm 3 and then to ng/Nm 3 Q sd dsft 3 /hr

Q sd Nm 3 /min Q sd Nm 3 /hr 99.14% 2,381.41 0.672

P dg AVF T k P k P dg AVF T k P k

92,467.75 Dry Standard Volumetric Flow in the stack (Normal Volumetric Units)

Dry Standard (Normal) Volumetric Flow Rate Pressure correction coefficient (P cor /P std )

99.14% 84,098.86 0.672 0.972 54,424.46 3,265,467.77 Standard Temperature in degrees Rankin 528 Temperature correction Coefficient (T std /T s cor)

1,541.13 Q sd dsft 3 /min

0.972

12.47 52.75
lb/hr NO X ton/yr NO X

24.50 0.509 0.0159
Ton/hr HNO 35283.03 Unit Flow Run 3 Stack Flow Worksheet



### A s 

### = ID =

π =

=

A s 

### =  ft 2 

### A s 

### =  m 2 

### A s 

### =  ft 2 

### A s 

### =  m 2



### A s 

### = ft 2 

### A s 

### = m 2



### P s 

### = Static pressure inside the stack measured in inchesof water "H 2 

### O P bar 

### = P std 

### = Standard Barometric Pressure P cor 

### = K flo w 

### =

K flo w 

### =( / ) x x 60 

### = A s



### K flo w 

### =( / ) x x 60 

### = A s 

### Date 4/4/2008 Start Time 15:20

3.1415927 as a pre-defined constant for circular geometry

ID 41.50 

### ID Tail Gas

16:35

AREA OF THE STACK

inside diameter of the stack wall in inches RUN 3 Plant CNRF Unit

End Time

Area of the Stack (L x W) or ( π x (ID/2) 2 

### )

1 inch 105.41 

### L (ength) L (ength) W (idth) inches centimeters

9.39 0.87 

### W (idth) 2.54 cm

9.39 0.87



### Corrected Barometric Pressure 29.07 

### "Hg KINETIC FLOW IN THE STACK
-2.96 " H 2 

### O Ambient barometric pressure in inches of Mercury "Hg 29.29 

### "Hg

K-Flow is the flow that would exist in the stack based on the ambient pressure and the internal pressure, and corrected to standard conditions

29.07 29.92 9.393 547.64 29.92 

### "Hg

P cor 

### P std 

### sec/min K flow scf/min

29.07 29.92 0.873 50.88 

### P cor 

### P std 

### sec/min K flow scm/min5283.03 Unit Flow.xls Run 3 Stack Flow Worksheet



### =

=

= =

1 2 3 4 5 6 SG



### mL V ic



### mL x = scf V ic 

### V k


### Allowing that flue gas is composed of CO2 + O2 + N2

=

=

=

=

100 

### % - ( + ) =

++ = 28.5964 

### g/mol of dry flue gas g CO 2 

### /mol g O 2 

### /mol g N 2 

### /mol M d 

### %CO 2 

### %O 2 

### %N 2

1.28 1.06 26.26 2.9 3.31 93.79 

### Distribution of components of the flue gas %O 2 

### Measured Percentage of O 2 

### in the Flue Gas %N 2 

### Calculated Percentage of N 2 

### in the Flue Gas

M d 

### Dry Molecular Weight of Theoretical Flue Gas %CO 2 

### Measured Percentage of CO 2 

### in the Flue Gas scm V w 

### std V w 

### std

Dry Molecular Weight

. 17.8 0.04707 0.838 0.02373 679.8 686.6 6.8



### Total Volume of Water Collected 17.8

504.0 504.5 0.5 587.0 593.4 6.4 544.0 548.1 4.1 

### Impinger # Initial Final Difference V k 

### Vapor Constant to correct mL of water to scf of water vapor 0.04707



### Impinger weights in grams Volume of Water Vapor Corrected to Standard Conditions

V w 

### std Volume of Water Vapor in gas sample Corrected to Standard Conditions V ic 

### Total volume of Water collected in Impinger Train5283.03 Unit Flow.xls Run 3 Stack Flow Worksheet

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1.013 x x ( / ) = 9

Y 10 11 12

x = 13 14 15

x = 16 17 18 19 20 / ( + ) / 100 = 21 22 23 24 25

averages

=

=

=
( x ) + ( x ) = P dg M d B ws MW H2O 28.363 g/mol MW H2O

M s 97.80% 28.59 6 2.20% 18 sc f 0.96 76.0 72.0 72.0 76.0

dscf dscm/dscf V m std 37.188 0.028317 1.0531 dscm

0.96
Wet Molecular weight of the Flue Ga s

M s Wet Molecular Weight of the flue gas measured Molecular weight of water (18 g/mol) P dg Percentage of dry gas in the sample. (100 % - B ws ) 75.5 71.5 76.0 71.0 0.96 V w

std V w std V m std B ws 0.8378 0.8378 37 2.20% E 1 Ideal Gas Constant V m std 2.1073 17.647 37.188 0.96 V dgm P c T dgm E 1 37.800 29.361 533. 5 2.1073 V dgm 37.8 0.96 150.200 188.000 74.0 71.0

Dry Gas Meter Readings DGM Temperatures o F ∆ H Initial Final Inlet Outlet " H 2 O Y Y correction Factor for DGM, Determined at calibration of DGM P c DGM Pressure[(average of Delta H readings / 13.6) + P bar ] V m std Dry Gas Meter Volume corrected to standard conditions

T avg T dgm T av g corrected to standard temperature Rankin ( o F +460) Average of the DGM inlet and outlet temperatures o F Percent Moisture by Volume of the Stack Flue Gase s

B ws Percentage of Moisture by Volume V dgm Volume of gas measured by the Dry Gas Meter (DGM)5283.03 Unit Flow.xls Run 3 Stack Flow Worksheet

=

=

=

= Average temperature across the stack in Rankin (T s + 460)

= T s

xx= 1 o F avg E 1 2 o F 3 o F 4 o F ( / ( x ) ) 1/2 = 5 o F 6 o F 7 o F 8 o F 9 o F 10 o F x = 11 o F 12 o F 13 o F 14 o F = fps 15 o F 16 o F = mps 17 o F 18 o F 19 o F 20 o F 21 o F 22 o F 23 o F 24 o F 25 o F
Averages

AVF =

x x=

x x= sec/min V s A s AVF ft 3 /min sec/min V s A s AVF

60 146.99 9.39 V s English 146.99

Actual Volumetric Flow In the Stac k

Actual Volumetric Flow in the stack V s Metric 44.80 150.63 0.98 146.99

E 1 E 2 V s 28.363 0.98 T s co r P cor M s E 2 K p C p

785.2 5 29.07 Stack Temp 0.8 4 2.0977 6 150.63 3.71 1.93 326 ∆ P Flue gas velocity in feet per secon d

K p Pitot Tube Constant 85.48

m 3 /min 82,844.51

60 44.80 0.87 2,345.90 4.406 2.10 325.3 325 4.65 2.16 3.91 1.98 4.25 2.06 4.74 2.18 4.42 2.10 4.43 2.10 4.81 2.19 4.29 2.07 4.50 2.12 4.51 2.12 4.45 2.11 325

4.55 2.13 4.13 2.03 325 4.68 2.16 4.59 2.1 4 3.65 1.91 4.75 2.18 4.57 2.14 4.16 2.04 4.75 2.18 4.5 4 2.13 4.21 4.50 2.05 2.12 V s

85.48 Stack Gas Velocity in feet per Second Point ∆ P T s co r C p Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 Differential pressure across the Pitot Tube in inches of Water "H 2 O5283.03 Unit Flow.xls Run 3 Stack Flow Worksheet

T std = T k =

x x = x 60 =

x 60 =

Q sd = P k = T std = T k =

x x x = x 60 =

x x x = x 60 =



### x/= =

x x x 60 =

lb NO 2 / ton HNO 3 NO 2 /ppm-ton of HNO 3 ng/dscm NO x ppm NO x 

### MW NO x 

### l/mol mg/dscm NO x 

### Conversion of ppm to mg/Nm 3 and then to ng/Nm 3 89,934.9 3 P dg AVF T k P k Q sd Nm 3 /min Q sd Nm 3 /hr 97.80% 2,345.9 0 0.672 3,176,021.9 4

P dg AVF T k P k Q sd dsft 3 /min Q sd dsft 3 /hr Pressure correction coefficient (P cor /P std )
Temperature correction Coefficient (T std /T s cor)

97.80% 82,844.51 0.672 0.972 52,933.7 0 SVF in scm/min SVF in scm/hr

Dry Standard Volumetric Flow in the stack (Normal Volumetric Units )

Dry Standard (Normal) Volumetric Flow Rate 3,247,577.8 0 T k V s K flow SVF in scf/min SVF in scf/hr Standard Volumetric Flow in the Stac k
Standard Temperature in degrees Rankin 528 Temperature correction Coefficient (T std /T s cor)

0.672 146.99 0 547.6 4 54,126.3 0

1,532.6 9 91,961.6 6

9.11E+06 

### x10 6 = 9.1052E+12 mg/dscm NO x 

### P dg SVF scm/min mg/hr NO x ng/hr NO x

101.242 97.80% 1,532.69 

### Mass Per Hour Emissions of Pollutants

52.91 46.000 24.04 101.242 1.012E+08 % ISO Standard Temperature in degrees Rankin 528

1,498.9 2 0.972



### 20.07 84.91 lb/hr NO X ton/yr NO X



### 24.69 0.813 0.0154 Ton/hr HNO 3

# A PPEN DIX C - U N IT O PE R ATI N G D ATA

# A PPEN DIX D - GAS CA LIBR ATION C ER TIFIC ATES

## I nst rum ent C ert i f i cat i on

All instruments are c ertified by the vendor s with reg ards to interf ere nce, r esponse a

nd repe atability . The following limit s are stated for the instrumentation utiliz ed;

• Resolution: 0.1 ppm

• No ise : L e ss t

he n 0 .5 % o f f

ull sc a le

• L ine a ri ty : + /- 0- .5 % o f f ull sc a le

• Re pe a ta

bil ity : B e tte r t

he n 0 .5 % o f f

ull sc a le

• Z e ro a nd

Spa n d ri ft : L e ss t

he n 0 .5 % o f f

ull sc a le in 1 68 ho ur s.

• I ns tr

ume nt R e sp on se Ti me : 1. 5 to 20 se c on ds (i ns tr ume nt a nd c on fi g ur a tio n d e pe nd a nt)

• All interfer ence < 1%

• All repa irs are perf

ormed by cer tified manufa cture r re prese ntatives

Sy s t em Sam pl e R es ponse:
Denovo ope rate s the sample sy stem at a c onstant flow ra te of a pproxi mately

5 liters / minute and 8 psi sample manifold pressur e. Sample line suction vac uum is allowed to fluctuate w ith the sy ste m de ma nd s. Exc e ss s a mpl e no t di re c te d to the a na ly zer s is e xter

na lly du mpe d to atmosphere

.
Us ing10 0 f

e e t of sa mpl e lin e , th e sa mpl e sy ste m ha s b e e n c a lc ulate d to ha ve a tot a l vo lum e (f ro m sa mpl e pr ob e to i ns tr

ume nt) of a pp ro xima te ly

2. 1 li te rs re su lti ng in a

n in iti a l sa

mpl e response time of 25 seconds. The same c onfig uration, including the bias loop has a c alculate d tot a l vo lum e of

3. 6 li te rs re su lti ng in a

n in iti a l bi a s r e sp on se tim e of 43 se c on ds

.

# Model 600 HCLD NO Interference Data

Interference Response

Date of Test 7/26/2006
Analyzer Type NO Model No. 600-HCLD Serial No. S050301
Calibration Span 3000ppm

Test Gas Type Concentration Analyzer Response (ppm) Wet Dry H2O 2.5% 0 0 CO2 5% 0 0 CO2 15% 0 0 CO 50 0 0 CH4 50 0 0 SO2 N/A N/A N/A NH3 15 0 0 NO N/A N/A N/A N2O 9 0 0 NO2 N/A N/A N/A

# California Analytical Instruments
Stability Certification to 40CFR53.23

California Analytical Instruments 600 series produc t line are produced with barometric and temperature compensation and th erefore intrinsically meet the EPA guidelines for temperatu re and pressure stability under 40CFR53.23 specification.
The input AC voltage range is 100 to 270VAC which i s greater than the specified range of variation stated in 40CFR53.23 a nd therefore meets or exceeds the requirement of the EPA guideline.
CAI’s 600 series includes the following analyzers;

600 HFID / M-HFID

600 CLD / HCLD

601 NDIR

601P NDIR

602 NDIR

602P NDIR

603 NDIR

# A PPE N DIX E - Q U ALITY AS S U R A N CE

# QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL

Specific quality control measures were used to insure the generation of reliable data from all sampling and analysis activities. Proper collection and organization of information followed by clear and concise reporting of the data was a primary goal in the project.

The objective of a quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program is to ensure that the precision and accuracy of all environmental data generated by DeNovo Global Technologies, Inc. is commensurate with data quality objectives (DQOs). DQOs are based on a common understanding of the intended end use(s) of the data, t he measurement process, and the availab ility of resources. Once DQOs are established, formally or informally, QC protocol can be defined for the
measurements.

In this project, the final data users will be Coffeyville Resources Nitr ogen Fert ilizers, U SEPA Region VII and the State of Kansas. The DQOs for th is project are to generate legally defensible data to be used to demonstrate compliance with Federal regulations associated with NSPS Subpart G and state operating permit requirements related to annual certification of continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS).

Two basic goals of a QC program are to:

1) Control errors; and

2) Verify that the entire analytical method is operating within acceptable performance
limits.

Use of qualified personnel, reliable and well-maintained equipment, appropriate calibrations and standards, and close supervision of all operations are important components of the QC program. The following sections describe the QC results for maintaining instruments and equipment in a state of calibration (defines the accuracy or bias error), results for measuring a continuously maintained state of cleanliness (eliminates interference or contamination), and the paper trail which documents that the methods were performed to in structions, calibrated within method performance standards, and/or traceable to National Technical Information Services (NTIS) standard reference materials. Standards of QA set forth in the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems , Volume III (U SEPA-600/4-77-027b) were strictly followed.

### F IE L D D A T A R E D U C T ION

Ex ampl e c al cul ati ons are us ed in the fiel d to ch eck on sa mpl in g cond iti ons an d a l is t of f ormul as

u se d t o r e d u ce t h e fi e l d d a ta

. Th e d a ta c o l l e ct e d w a s re v i e w e d i n the f i e l d by the Pr o je ct M a n a ger

. Erro rs o r disc r ep an ci es were note d o n th e d ata she et. Ap pen di ces of thi s re port pres ent the
stan dard iz ed f orms th at w ere use d to rec ord f ie ld sa mpl in g data

.

INTERNA L QC CHECKS A ND FREQUENCY

QC c hec ks w ere performed to e nsu re the col le cti on of repres enta tiv e s ampl es and the gene rati on

o f v a l i d a n a l y ti ca l r e su l ts o f th e se s a mp l e s. The se ch e cks w e re p e rfor me d b y p ro je ct p a rt i ci p a n ts
th ro u gho u t th e p ro gra m.

QA PROCEDURES

The fol l o w i n g QA

p ro ce d u re s w e re i mp l e me n te d d u ri n g th i s te st p ro gra m:

! Use of de si gnated sampl in g and an al y tic al equi pmen t. T he sa mpl in g equip ment

use d i n th is tes t met al l cal ib rati on and op erati ng cri teri a o f the ap pl ic abl e K ans as De partmen t of He al th a nd En v iro nmen t an d U SE PA M etho ds.

! Sa mpl in g sy stem w as cal ib rated and op erate d a cco rdi ng to Ka nsa s D epa rtment o f
He al th a nd E nvironment and U SE PA do cumen ted proc edu res. A ll si te a cti v iti es i n cl u d i n g a u d i t re su l ts w e re l o gged i n to t h e d a i l y s i te b o o k.

! E q u ip m e n t ca li b r a t io n

. T h e po r t a b le sa m p li n g eq u ip m e n t i s c a l i b r a t e d wit h t wo

co n ce n tr a ti o n s o f U S E P A P ro to co l 1 ga ss e s and a zero gas b e fore t h e fi rs t te st

. Calibration span sett ing s are chec k ed af te r e a ch run. Ot her t est equ ipmen t is
cal ib rated i n a cco rdan ce w ith U SE PA sp eci f ic ati o n s i n Q u a l i t y A ssu ranc e H and boo k for A i r P o l l u ti o n M e a su re me n t S y st e ms , V o l u me I II ( U S E P A -6 0 0 /4 -7 7 -0 2 7 b ).