alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 144 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 144

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to remove cell phones from 
                  listed property under section 280F.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2009

 Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Ensign) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to remove cell phones from 
                  listed property under section 280F.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Modernize Our Bookkeeping In the Law 
for Employee's Cell Phone Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF CELLULAR TELEPHONES (OR SIMILAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS 
              EQUIPMENT) FROM LISTED PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 280F(d)(4) of the 
Internal Revenue Code (defining listed property) is amended by 
inserting ``and'' at the end of clause (iv), by striking clause (v), 
and by redesignating clause (vi) as clause (v).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



Certification





Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:



(1) I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;



(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.





|       |                                                                      
|------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation                            
|       | General Partner                                                      
|       |                                                                      
|       |                                                                      
|       | /S/ Brenda G. Gujral                                                 
|       |                                                                      
|Name:  | Brenda G. Gujral                                                     
|Title: | President of the General Partner and                                 
|       | principal executive officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.
|Date:  | March 23, 2006
Dear Mr. Sewell:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−3649). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) to process your petition.

 Your petition references the material(s) listed below, however the material(s) was/were

not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced 

materials:

o Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/26/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4549.

Sincerely,

/S/

Michael J. Cameron

Program Analyst
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4761]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of RCRA Consent Decree

    Notice is hereby given that on February 14, 2012, a proposed 
Consent Decree (``Decree'') in United States v. Pure Earth Recycling, 
Inc. (f/k/a Casie Ecology Oil Salvage, Inc. and Mid-Atlantic Recycling 
Technologies, Inc.), Civil Action No. 11-CV-00161-JBS-AMD, was lodged 
with the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
    In this action the United States sought civil penalties and 
injunctive relief against Pure Earth Recycling under the Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act (``RCRA''), 42 U.S.C. 6928, in connection 
with the Settling Defendant's violations of RCRA at its Vineland, New 
Jersey Facility. Under the proposed Consent Decree, the Settling 
Defendant agrees to pay a civil penalty of $750,000 subject to certain 
circumstances; comply with all terms and provisions of RCRA; comply 
with all applicable state and federal hazardous waste regulations; and 
if the Settling Defendant resumes operations at its Facility, comply 
with the Standard Operating Procedures set forth in the Consent Decree. 
The terms of the settlement regarding the amount of the civil penalty 
are based upon representations made by the Settling Defendant 
concerning its ability to pay.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Decree. 
Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, 
Environmental and Natural Resources Division, and either emailed to 
[email protected] or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to 
United States v. Pure Earth Recycling, Inc. (f/k/a Casie Ecology Oil 
Salvage, Inc. and Mid-Atlantic Recycling Technologies, Inc.), Civil 
Action No. 11-CV-00161-JBS-AMD (D. N.J.), D.J. Ref. 90-7-1-09668.
    During the public comment period, the Decree may also be examined 
on the following Department of Justice Web site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the Decree may also be obtained 
by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department 
of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 or by faxing or emailing a 
request to ``Consent Decree Copy'' ([email protected]), fax no. 
(202) 514-0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514-5271. In requesting 
a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the 
amount of $8.75 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the 
U.S. Treasury or, if by email or fax, forward a check in that amount to 
the Consent Decree Library at the address given above.

Ronald G. Gluck,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-4761 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
```
Exhibit 99.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer,
Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Borland Software Corporation (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Dale L. Fuller, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Report and result
of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/    DALE L.
FULLER                 
|Dale L. Fuller Chief Executive Officer

March 27, 2003



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.44 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, Loglines, Warrant Officers

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Aspirity Holdings LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy S. Krieger, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and I, Wiley H. Sharp III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act
of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









/s/ Timothy S. Krieger

Timothy S. Krieger

Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and President

Date: August
17, 2015









/s/ Wiley H. Sharp III

Wiley H. Sharp
III

Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial
Officer

Date: August
17, 2015
Exhibit 10.3
  LANDSTAR
    SYSTEM, INC.
  SUPPLEMENTAL
    EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
  As
    Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2010
      ARTICLE 1
  DEFINITIONS
  Accrued Benefit
  Beneficiary
  Board
  Code
  Committee
  Company
  Compensation
  Deferral Contributions
  Effective Date




---



##### 



Employer
  Employee
  Grandfathered Account
  Individual Account
  Matching Contributions
  Participant
  Plan
  Plan Year
  Savings Plan
  Termination of Employment
  ARTICLE 2
  ELIGIBILITY
    AND ELECTIONS
  Eligibility.
  Election as to Form of
    Payment.
      Election as to Time of
    Payment.




---



##### 



ARTICLE 3
  INDIVIDUAL
    ACCOUNT
  Creation of Individual
    Account.
  Election to Make Deferral Contributions.
        Matching Contributions.
  Earnings.




---



##### 



ARTICLE 4
  DISTRIBUTIONS
    OF RETIREMENT BENEFITS
  Payment of Individual
    Account.
  Separate Payments.
  Distributions of Grandfathered
    Account.
  ARTICLE 5DEATH BENEFIT
    ARTICLE 6VESTING
    ARTICLE 7FUNDING




---



##### 



ARTICLE 8ADMINISTRATION
  Powers and Duties of the
    Committee.
  Claim for Benefits.
  Initial Review.
              Appeal. 60-day
  Decision on Review.
  ARTICLE 9AMENDMENT




---



##### 



ARTICLE 10TERMINATION
    ARTICLE 11MISCELLANEOUS
  Rights of
    Participants.
  Effect on Other Plans.
  Binding Nature of Plan.
  Governing Law.
  No Assignment.
  No Liability.
  Section 409A.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

SR/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARTIN HERNANDEZ-OLGUIN, AKA

Alvaro Martin Hernandez- Fuentes, AKA

Martin Hernandez-Olquin,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-10350

D.C. No. 4:06-cr-01610-FRZ

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Frank R. Zapata, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2010** 

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. 

Martin Hernandez-Olguin appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 66-

month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1326. 

FILED

APR 01 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
SR/Research 2 08-10350

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hernandez-Olguin’s

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Amendment No. 5 to Lease and License Agreement, dated 01/25/2008



 Exhibit 10.20 

MARYLAND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER 

LICENSE AGREEMENT 

AMENDMENT 5 

This addendum is made this
25th day of January, 2008, by and between MEDCO and
Neogenix Oncology, Inc. (“Licensee”). 
 WHEREAS, MEDCO and Licensee have entered into a License Agreement dated
April 28, 2004; 
 WHEREAS, Licensee currently occupies Labs #211 and #222, and office #317 in the Maryland Technology
Development Center in Montgomery County, Maryland (the “Original Premises”); 
 WHEREAS Licensee wishes to expand its
space within the Maryland Technology Development Center and MEDCO is willing to provide for such expansion based on the terms provided for below; 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements stated herein, the parties agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	MEDCO hereby grants to Licensee and Licensee hereby accepts a License (the “License”) to use an additional office spaces identified as offices #267 (“the
Expansion Premises”) effective February 1, 2008 

  

	 	2.	The additional monthly cash license payment resulting from the Expansion Premises (the “Monthly Payment”) shall be payable by Licensee in equal monthly
installments, on or before the first day of each month, and shall be as follows: 

  

				
	 From February 1, 2008 to April 30, 2008
	  	$	725
		
	 Renewal Term (If granted by MEDCO):
	  		
		
	 From May 1, 2008 to April 30, 2009:
	  	$	797

  

	 	3.	The aggregate Monthly Payment, to include the Monthly Payment for the Original Premises and the Expansion Premises provided for herein shall be as follows:


  

				
	 From February 1, 2008 to April 30, 2008
	  	$	9,351
		
	 Renewal Term (If granted by MEDCO):
	  		
		
	 From May 1, 2008 to April 30, 2009:
	  	$	10,286









	 	4.	On or before the Effective Date of this Amendment, Licensee shall pay to MEDCO a sum equal to one (1) Monthly Payment for the Expansion Premises, to be held by
MEDCO as security deposit for the full, faithful and punctual performance by Licensee’s terms, covenants and conditions contained herein for the full term of the License Agreement. At such time that this License Amendment commences, Licensee
shall be required to pay a sum of $725.00 as additional security deposit. 

  

	 	5.	All other provisions of the original License Agreement shall apply to this Amendment 


This Amendment may be signed in counterparts. 
  

									
	 FOR:
	 	 Maryland Economic

Development Corporation
	 		 	FOR:	 	 Licensee
 Neogenix Oncology,
Inc.

					
	 BY:
	 	
 



	 		 	BY:	 	
 




		 	 Scheer Partners, Inc.

Center Manager
	 		 		 	
					
	 Date:
	 	01/28/2008	 		 	Date:	 	Jan. 25, 2008
					
	 BY:
	 	 /s/ Robert C. Brennan
	 		 		 	
		 	 Robert C. Brennan
 Executive
Director, MEDCO
	 		 		 	
					
	 Date:
	 	2/4/08
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance  sheet and the  consolidated  statement of income filed as
part of the  annual  report on Form 10-K and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to such annual report on Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000853102
<NAME>                                         Day Runner, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                         15,550
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,664
<INVENTORY>                                     23,406
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,054
<PP&E>                                          18,231
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,344
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,478
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,880
<SALES>                                        127,376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,376
<CGS>                                           60,452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,301)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,650
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,102
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,548
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,548
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.90
        


</TABLE>
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Replace Disk 48.0 $4,080.0

0

$73,000 $77,080.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): ASE estimated 

cost based on pro-rata reduction on the life of the disk (9,700 cycles vs ALS 11,610 cycles), which 

applies to all 20 disks. Disk cost provided by RR plc ($443,000 for a new disk).
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: