alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Kittel, a Taxpayer, Appellant, *v.*City of Cincinnati et al., Appellees.

(No. 30793

Decided November 13, 1946.)

*Mr. Sol Goodman*and *Messrs. Rosen &*Rosen, for appellant.

*247
      *Mr. John D. Ellis*and *Mr. Ed F. Alexander,*/or appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, 0. J., Zimmerman, Williams, Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Bell, J., not participating.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.26 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, always accountable, people and culture, Denison Consulting, Climate/Culture Survey, action plans

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Roberts Pharmaceutical Corporation on (1) Form S-3 (File No. 333-13729) and (2)
Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-34767, 33-61543, 333-09847 and 333-66705) of our report
dated February 5, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
of Roberts Pharmaceutical Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997
and for each of the two years in the periods ended December 31, 1997 and 1996,
which report is included in the Corporation's 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Florham Park, New Jersey
November 22, 1999
#### Keineth Garland FULLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-86-412.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Aug. 30, 1988.

ORDER CORRECTING OPINION

On August 26, 1988, this Court was informed that the opinion issued in the above-styled cause inadvertently and erroneously recited that appellant’s two life sentences on two counts of Shooting With Intent to Kill in Pontotoc County District Court, Case No. CRF-85-95, were to run concurrently. The judgment and sentence expressly indicates that Count II is to “run consecutive with ... Count I.” (O.R. 90).

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that the opinion in *Fuller v. State,*751 P.2d 766 (Okla.Crim.App.1988), shall be corrected to show that the two life sentences in Pontotoc County District Court, Case No. CFR-85-95, are to run *consecutively.*

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BRETT, P.J., and BUSSEY and PARKS, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                             Exhibit 23.2



          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                     (BDO Seidman, LLP letterhead)



Allegiant Bancorp, Inc.
St. Louis, Missouri

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-13451 and 333-26433) and on Form
S-3 (File No. 333-65699) of Allegiant Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) of our
report dated March 13, 1998, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 1997,
appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999.

                                      /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP


St. Louis, Missouri
March 13, 2000
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00355-CV

WILLIAM M. WINDSOR,

Appellant

v.

SAM ROUND,

Appellee

From the 378th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 88611

ORDER

On December 3, 2014, Appellant filed a Motion for Computer Access requesting 

this Court to order the Ellis County Jail to allow appellant access to his personal 

computer. Appellant is no longer confined in the Ellis County Jail.

Accordingly, appellant’s motion is dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM
Windsor v. Round Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion dismissed as moot

Order issued and filed May 28, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,099
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     42,593
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        103,976
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,964
<DEPOSITS>                                     134,303
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,833
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,204
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 159,964
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,637
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,507
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   138
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,282
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,154
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,157
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,125
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  (2)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,410
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,410
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.13
<LOANS-NON>                                        560
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    510
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,034
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      181
<RECOVERIES>                                       323
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,176
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,640
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,536


</TABLE>
ex10-1.htm


  


    EXHIBIT 10.1

    


    Executive
Salaries for 2010

    


    On March
22, 2010, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company
(the “Committee”) approved 2010 base salaries for the executive officers,
effective April 1, 2010, as set forth below:

    


    
      	
              Executive
      Officer

            	
              Title

            	 	
              Salary

            	 
	
              Richard
      J. Braun

            	
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer

            	 	$	390,000	 
	
              Kevin
      J. Wiersma

            	
              Chief
      Financial Officer, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of MEDTOX
      Laboratories, Inc.

            	 	$	235,800	 
	
              James
      A. Schoonover

            	
              Vice
      President and Chief Marketing Officer

            	 	$	235,800	 
	
              B.
      Mitchell Owens

            	
              Vice
      President and Chief Operating Officer of MEDTOX Diagnostics,
      Inc.

            	 	$	223,100	 
	
              Susan
      E. Puskas

            	
              Vice
      President Quality, Regulatory Affairs, and Human Resources

            	 	$	235,800
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald C. BLACK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 86CA0912.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Feb. 4, 1988.

Rehearing Denied March 3, 1988.

Certiorari Denied Aug. 1, 1988.

*747Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., Maureen Phelan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

David F. Vela, State Public Defender, Douglas D. Barnes, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

METZGER, Judge.

The defendant, Ronald C. Black, was convicted after a jury trial of sexual assault on a child and enticement of a child. He appeals only the judgment of conviction of enticement of a child, arguing that the trial court erred as a matter of law in denying his motion to dismiss that charge. We affirm.

Defendant contends that § 18-3-305, C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B) (enticement of a child) is limited by its plain language to sexual assaults in the first, second, or third degree as defined in §§ 18-3-402, 18-3-403, 18-3-404, C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B). Thus, he argues, since the offense of sexual assault on a child is not designated as having any degree, *see*§ 18-3-405, C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B), as a matter of statutory construction, conviction of sexual assault on a child precludes conviction of enticement of a child.

In response, the People assert that the enticement statute requires only that the actor entice the child with the intent to commit sexual assault in any degree. Thus, they argue, since the evidence showed that defendant intended to commit sexual assault at the time of enticement, the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss. We agree with the People.

Section 18-3-305(1), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B) provides that:

> “A person commits the crime of enticement of a child if he invites or persuades ... a child under the age of fifteen years to enter any vehicle ... *with the intent to commit sexual assault in any degree upon said*child....” (emphasis added)

The statute requires only that the People prove the defendant acted with the intent to cause the result of a sexual assault of some degree upon a victim younger than fifteen years of age. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the fact that he was unable to complete a sexual assault of any degree is irrelevant.

The People presented evidence showing that the defendant invited and persuaded the 12-year-old victim to enter his vehicle, drove to a remote location, overpowered her, and attempted to sexually assault her. This evidence was sufficient to establish defendant’s intent to commit a second-degree sexual assault, as defined by § 18-3-403(1)(e), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B). Thus, even though the defendant was neither charged with nor convicted of a first, second, or third degree sexual assault, the record contains sufficient evidence to demonstrate that defendant had the requisite intent to commit a sexual assault of any degree, as required by the enticement statute.

Judgment affirmed.

PIERCE and CRISWELL, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer, in connection with the Quarterly Report of CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                                            
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 9, 2018


/s/ Mark Gatto


Mark Gatto


Co-Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


CĪON Investment Corporation
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 124 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 124

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                   For the relief of Shigeru Yamada.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SHIGERU YAMADA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Shigeru 
Yamada shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Shigeru Yamada enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Shigeru 
Yamada shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall 
apply only if the application for issuance of an immigrant visa or the 
application for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees not 
later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Shigeru Yamada, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or subsequent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of birth of Shigeru 
Yamada under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of birth of Shigeru 
Yamada under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).

            Passed the Senate December 3, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 124

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

                   For the relief of Shigeru Yamada.
```
AFS
- 14
- 332
- E

June 30, 2014 Exemption No. 11018 Regulatory

Docket No. FAA
- 20 1 4
- 0399 Ms. Erin Nolan Parent of Parker Joseph Nolan 6263 L inden L ane Dallas, TX 75 230 Dear Ms. Nolan : This letter is to inform y ou that we have granted y our request for exemption. I t transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends. **The Basis for Our De cision**  By letter received June 18, 2014 , y ou petitioned the Federal Aviation Administrat ion (FAA) on behalf of Parker Joseph Nolan for an exemption from § 121.311(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
. That exemp tion , if granted, w ould allo w Parker to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA
- approved child restraint sy stem (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation ) during use of that child restraint sy stem (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft. The FAA has determined that good c ause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Parker
. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in c ircumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in y our petition. I n Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous p eople with phy sical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint sy stems that addressed unique phy sical needs regarding safety , support, and security in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint sy stems by persons with disabilities.2

Having reviewed y our reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—  they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834 ;  the reasons stated by

the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834 also apply to the situation y ou present; and  a grant of exemption is in the public interest. **Our Decision** Under the authority

contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegate d to me, Ihereby grant Parker Joseph Nolan an exemption from § 121.311(b)
. Inaddition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Parker is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent nece ssary

to allow h im to use an FAA
- approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft
. All operations under this exemption must be conducted w ith at least one of Parker ’s parents or a caregiver accompanying h im
. Parker Joseph Nolan may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger se ated behind him
. Inaddition, Parker ’ s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight. This exemption terminates on July 31, 2019 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded. Sincerely , /s/ John Barbagallo Acting Deputy

Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

The Flight Shop, Inc. D/B/ AI Professional Air and 

Aero Facilities, LLC 

Complainants 

v. 

City of Bend, Oregon Municipal Airport 

Respondent 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

Docket No. 16-14-12 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby 

extended to June 14, 2016. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March ~'J,..!) , 2016, I caused to be placed in the United 

States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the Notice of Extension of Time to 

June 14, 2016 for FAA Docket 16-14-12 addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant 

Leonard D. Kirsch, Esq. 

McBreen & Kopko 

500 North Broadway 

Jericho, NY 11753 

Email: lkirsch@mklawnyc.com 

Martin E. Hansen, Esq. 

Francis, Hansen & Martin LLP 

1148 NW Hill Street 

Bend,Oregon 97701 

Email: meh@francishansen.com 

Counsel for Respondent 

Pablo 0. Ni.iesch 

Katherine M. Mapes 

Jessica R. Bell 

Spiegel & McDiarmid LLP 

1875 Eye Street N.W. Suite 700 

Washington DC 20006 

Email: pablo.nuesch@spiegelmcd.com 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airports Compliance Division, AC0-100 

FAAANM II { G -_ ····-··· "--.. (2;;.414~ --:) ..... Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis