alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                             WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-69209, Form S-8 No. 333-63339, Form S-8 No. 33-85718, Form S-8
No. 33-95580 and Form S-8 No. 333-27913) pertaining to (i) the Retirement
Savings Value Plan For Employees of WestPoint Stevens Inc. and Retirement
Savings Value Plan For Employees of Liebhardt Inc., (ii) the 1995 Key Employee
Stock Bonus Plan, (iii) the Retirement Savings Value Plan For Employees of
WestPoint Stevens Inc., (iv) the 1995 Key Employee Stock Bonus Plan and (v) the
Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, respectively, of our report dated February 9,
1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
WestPoint Stevens Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1998.





                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Columbus, Georgia
March 26, 1999
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan, the Amended and
Restated 1989 Stock Option Plan, and the 401(K) Retirement Plan for Cost-U-Less,
Inc., of our report dated February 23, 2001, except as to Note 13 as to which
the date is March 29, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Cost-U-Less, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form
10-K/A) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.

                                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 29, 2002
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1319 

To require Congress to specify the source of authority under the United 

States Constitution for the enactment of laws, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2009 

Mr. COBURN (for himself, Mr. KYL, Mr. THUNE, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. CRAPO, 

Mr. INHOFE, Mr. ENZI, Mr. BURR, Mr. WICKER, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. 

MCCAIN, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. VITTER, Mr. 

BARRASSO, Mr. DEMINT, and Mrs. HUTCHISON) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and 

Administration 

A BILL 

To require Congress to specify the source of authority under 

the United States Constitution for the enactment of laws, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enumerated Powers 

5 Act’’. 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 1319 IS

1 SEC. 2. SPECIFICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY 

2 FOR ENACTMENT OF LAW. 

3 (a) CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY FOR THIS ACT.— 

4 This Act proposes to establish new procedures by which 

5 legislation shall be considered by Congress and is enacted 

6 pursuant to the power granted Congress under article I, 

7 section 5, clause 2, of the United States Constitution es8 tablishing that each House may determine the rules of its 

9 proceedings. 

10 (b) CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT RE11 QUIRED.—Chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is 

12 amended by inserting after section 102 the following new 

13 section: 

14 ‘‘§ 102a. Constitutional authority clause 

15 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Each Act of Congress shall con16 tain a concise explanation of the specific constitutional au17 thority relied upon for the enactment of each portion of 

18 that Act. The failure to comply with this section shall give 

19 rise to a point of order in either House of Congress. The 

20 availability of this point of order does not affect any other 

21 available relief. 

22 ‘‘(b) DISPOSITION OF POINT OF ORDER IN THE SEN23 ATE.— 

24 ‘‘(1) LIMIT ON DEBATE.—In the Senate, a 

25 point of order raised under subsection (a) shall be— 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
3 

•S 1319 IS

1 ‘‘(A) submitted to the Senate for decision; 

2 and 

3 ‘‘(B) subject to not more than 3 hours of 

4 debate equally divided between the Senator rais5 ing the point of order and the floor manager of 

6 the underlying measure or their designees. 

7 ‘‘(2) MOTION TO TABLE.—In the Senate, no 

8 motion to table a point of order raised under sub9 section (a) shall be in order until all debate time has 

10 expired or has been yielded back.’’. 

11 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

12 at the beginning of chapter 2 of title 1, United States 

13 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to 

14 section 102 the following new item: 

‘‘102a. Constitutional authority clause.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
### Oa (sc . 

## me-i -- (.-koD cl 1 d S 

### cs d e \ycck, (o---w\eo6)--kC iniNt 

# -3 LP /014_ 

## J,

OMT- - L00` -- t — coo/ 

### 363IZ6_S



### COMPANY SANITIZED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner

v. WILLIAM TERRY LEDFORD, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : No. 639 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 25th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the  quarterly  report of Northern  Explorations,  Ltd. (the
Company)  on Form 10-Q for the  period  ended  June 30,  2009 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  Report)  the
undersigned  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: September 18, 2009            /s/ KENNETH J. YONIKA
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Kenneth Yonika, CPA, Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to WHY USA and will be retained by
WHY USA and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.
EX-4.13



 Exhibit 4.13 

Schedule 4.13 
 The Supplemental
Indentures listed below were entered into in substantially the same form as the Supplemental Indenture (2022 Notes), dated as of September 25, 2015, by and among the Company, certain of its subsidiaries, and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee (previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission File no. 001-16109), filed with the Commission on September 25, 2015). The only material difference between the documents is the addition of
new Company subsidiary guarantors under the applicable indenture. 
  

	 	1.	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 2015, by and among the Company, certain of its subsidiaries, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee. 


 

	 	2.	Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 8, 2016, by and among the Company, certain of its subsidiaries, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.
**Memorandum**





Party
      A:
      Hongyuan Pharmaceutical Technology Consulting Service Center of Yuexiu District
      of Guangzhou


Party
      B:
      Guangzhou Konzern Pharmaceutical Co., LTD





In
      accordance with the approval procedure set forth in the Regulation on Biological
      Product Registration of PRC, in the view that approval procedure of Bacillus
      Calmette-Guerin Vaccine is much different than that of other drugs, and in
      view
      of the high risk in Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Vaccine Transfer Agreement made
      and
      entered by Party A and Party B, both parties agree on the memorandum of the
      aforesaid agreement. Both the Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Vaccine Transfer
      Agreement and this Memorandum are equally legal binding.





1.
            Party
                B should pay the deposit amounted RMD 20million to attend the
                bidding;


2.
            When
                Party A obtain the manufacturing license, Party B may attend the
                bidding;


3.
            Both
                parties hereto acknowledge that the term of clinical experiment is
                2
                years. Party A should return the deposit amounted RMD 20million if
                the
                clinical experiment can not be concluded;
                and


4.
            If
                Party B does not win the manufacturing license in bidding, Party
                A should
                fully return the deposit set forth in Article 1 within 20
                days.











Party
      A:
      Hongyuan Pharmaceutical Technology Consulting Service Center of Yuexiu District
      of Guangzhou


Representative:
      Ms Yanli Gu


Date:
      June 2, 2008





Party
      B:
      Guangzhou Konzern Pharmaceutical Co., LTD


Representative:
      Mr Senshan Yang


Date:
      June 2, 2008
exv10w3






Exhibit 10.3




BUY-OUT AGREEMENT




     This Buy-Out (this “Agreement”), dated and effective as of April 28, 2010 (the
“Effective Date”) is by and between Superior Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), and Terence E. Hall (the “Executive”).



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, Executive is serving as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company pursuant to an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective as of July 15, 1999 and
amendments to that agreement (the “1999 Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to terminate the 1999 Agreement.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the respective representations and
warranties hereinafter set forth and of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto
agree as follows:



     1. Termination of 1999 Agreement. As of the Effective Date, the 1999 Agreement (other
than Articles 9, 11, 12, 13, 17 and Appendix A) shall terminate. However, if Executive enters into
the Executive Chairman Agreement on or before the Effective Date, Executive shall be treated as
having no break in employment for purposes of vesting in any stock options and restricted stock he
may have been granted before the Effective Date.



     2. Buy-Out Payment. The Company shall pay Executive $7,992,000 on the Effective Date.



     3. Release. Executive agrees that the payment under this Agreement satisfies and
extinguishes all obligations arising out of the 1999 Agreement and any prior employment agreement
and Executive releases the Company from any further obligation under the terms of the 1999
Agreement, including any right Executive may have to receive further payments under the terms of
the 1999 Agreement.



     4. Withholding. The Company may withhold from any amounts payable under this
Agreement such federal, state or local taxes required to be withheld pursuant to any applicable law
or regulation.



     5. Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement of the parties
hereto and replaces and merges any previous agreements or discussions concerning the subject matter
of this Agreement. This Agreement may not be altered, modified, or amended except by written
instrument signed by the parties hereto.



     6. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument.



     7. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced according to and
governed by Louisiana law without regard to principles of conflict of laws.



 









 







     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above
written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 /s/ Enoch L. Dawkins	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

Enoch L. Dawkins 


Lead Director
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EXECUTIVE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
/s/ Terence E. Hall	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Terence E. Hall	 	 






					
	 	 	 	 	 
	Terence E. Hall 

Bay-Out Agreement
	 	Page 2
	 	Effective April 28, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                             866
<SECURITIES>                                       505
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,185
<ALLOWANCES>                                       346
<INVENTORY>                                        391
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,839
<PP&E>                                           8,169
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,715
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,448
<SALES>                                         14,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,257
<CGS>                                            4,979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   118
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    265
<INCOME-TAX>                                       112
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                153
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       153
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of E Energy Adams, LLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of E Energy Adams, LLC, as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    E Energy Adams, LLCs other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for E Energy Adams, LLC, and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to E Energy Adams, LLC, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of E Energy Adams, LLCs disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in E Energy Adams, LLCs internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during E Energy Adams, LLCs most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, E Energy Adams, LLCs internal control over financial reporting.
 5
    
    E Energy Adams, LLCs other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to E Energy Adams, LLCs
auditors and the audit committee of E Energy Adams, LLCs board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect E Energy Adams, LLCs ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in E Energy Adams, LLCs internal controls over financial
reporting.
 Date:      July 5, 2006
    
    /s/ Jack L. AldermanJack L. AldermanChairman and President (Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,731,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                   203,500
<INVENTORY>                                 13,269,560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,537,678
<PP&E>                                      21,035,516
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,181,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,828,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,457,354
<BONDS>                                      9,672,470
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       10,037,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        65,062
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,596,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,828,971
<SALES>                                     71,685,080
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            71,685,080
<CGS>                                       57,451,620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               57,451,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,834,276
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                43,688
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,636,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                759,444
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (171,321)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            930,765
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   930,765
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        


</TABLE>
WILLIE CHARLES 

CARPENTER, JR.,

Petitioner,

v.

HENRIETTA BROWN 

DRAYTON,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-1866

Opinion filed July 9, 2015.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Willie Charles Carpenter, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

ROBERTS, C.J., THOMAS and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [ Project No. 1992-003—California]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for a new license for the Fire Mountain Lodge Hydroelectric Project, located on Fern Spring, near the town of Mill Creek in Tehama County, California, and has prepared an environmental assessment (EA). In the EA, Commission staff analyze the potential environmental effects of the proposed project and conclude that issuing a new license for the proposed project, with appropriate environmental measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.

                    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*                     or toll-free at (866) 208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.                

                    You may also register online at                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​esubscribenow.htm*                     to be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*                     or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.                

                    Please contact Matt Buhyoff by telephone at (202) 502-6824 or by email at                     *matt.buhyoff@ferc.gov*                     if you have any questions.                

Dated: February 16, 2012.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-4410 Filed 2-24-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00203-CV

Myra Morris, Kleberg County Attorney Kira Talip, and Kleberg County Judge Rudy 

Madrid

v.

Corina Madrigal

On Appeal from the

105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 15-124-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 11, 2015