alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the ESTATE OF David Wreyford BURNFORD, a/k/a D.W. Burnford, David Burnford, David W. Burnford, Dr. Burnford, D. Wreyford Burnford and Dr. David Burnford, And Concerning: Sharon Roark Burnford, Petitioner-Appellant.

No. 86CA1301.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

May 7, 1987.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 27, 1987.

Certiorari Denied Nov. 16, 1987.

Douglas P. Allen, Aspen, for the Estate.

James R. Benson, Jr. P.C., James R. Benson, Jr., Denver, for petitioner-appellant.

METZGER, Judge.

In this probate matter, Sharon Roark Burnford (wife) appeals the order of a district court referee in which the referee ruled that her petition to take an elective share of her decedent husband's estate was filed untimely. We conclude that because wife failed to seek review of the referee’s order in the district court, this court is without jurisdiction to consider her appeal. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal with prejudice.

After her husband’s will was admitted to formal probate, wife filed a petition to take her elective share of his estate. Thereafter, a district court referee conducted a hearing to determine whether the petition had been filed timely. In his order, the referee concluded that wife’s petition had been filed untimely and, pursuant to G.R.R. 5(e)(1), ordered that any party seeking review of his decision by the district court *52must do so within 15 days. Neither party filed a petition for review.

Over seven months later, wife filed a motion requesting the district court to certify the referee’s order as a final, appeal-able judgment pursuant to C.R.C.P. 54(b). After the district court entered the C.R.C. P. 54(b) certification order, wife filed her notice of appeal.

Procedures for seeking review of an order entered by a district court referee are found in the Colorado Rules for Referees (C.R.R.). C.R.R. 5(e)(5) provides that a party to a proceeding conducted by a district court referee shall not be entitled to appellate review of any order or judgment entered in that proceeding unless that party filed a motion for review of the order or judgment pursuant to C.R.R. 5(e)(5)(2). Since wife failed to file a motion seeking district court review of the referee’s order, we hold that she is not entitled to appellate review.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

PIERCE and KELLY, JJ., concur.
KATHLEEN C. HOCHUL 1711 LONGWORTH HOUSE OFRCE BUILDING 

, „ „ ' , ., WASHINGTON, DC 20515 

26TH DISTRICT, NEW YORK (2021 225-5265 

i ...- D I LMMJ ^ 

n A !i: uo 

Consres^s^ ot tfte ^niteb States? 

i^ousfe of 3^epre2!cntatit)C£( 

Masfjington, BC 20515-3226 

July 28, 2011 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

8*'' Floor, Room W86-310 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington D.C. 20590 

Re: Niagara County Center for Economic Development 

Small Community Air Service Development Program Grant Application 

To Whom It May Concern, 

I am writing in strong support of the Niagara County Center for Economic Development 

(NCCED) application to the US Department of Transportation Small Community Air Service 

Development Program (SCASDP). The NCCED proposes to request funds designed to provide 

financial assistance to help enhance air service operations and marketing of the Niagara Falls 

International Airport (NFIA). 

The NFIA is an attractive alternative to currently congested major North American 

International airports. With its 10,825 ft. main runway, 24-hour operation (no curfews), 24 hr. 

operations services, excellent access to inspection agencies, and price competitive landing fees, 

the NFIA is ideally suited and strategically located to accommodate various types of aviation 

operations suited for business and leisure use. The close proximity of the airport to the 

Canada/USA border, its location just off a major highway, and its central location to the Canada 

and USA population base, offer great economic advantages. 

Significant developments and investment has been made at the airport. This has 

created private investment throughout the community and has secured additional 

transportation needs and opportunities. Grant funding from the SCASDP is needed to ensure 

that these new developments continue to grow. 

The local stakeholder community cannot completely fund their marketing airport 

initiatives and provide incentives to entice additional airline carriers. Federal assistance is 

needed to 

PRIMTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 
KATHLEEN C. HOCHUL 

26TH DISTRICT, NEW YORK 

1711 LONGWORTH HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING 

WASHINGTON, DC 20515 

(202)225-6265 

Congresfsf of tfje Winitth States; 

^ou&t of il^epregentatibes; 

mammton, mt 20515-3226 

complete this important task. A SCASDP award will help expand the airport's existence, bring 

greater involvement to the community while enhancing economic competiveness. 

I am confident that the NCCED grant request will greatly improve quality of life 

throughout Western New York and act as a model initiative that could assist future airlines to 

invest throughout our community that benefits stakeholders and tourist to our region. 

In closing, I would like to go on record in support of their application and I urge you to 

consider this application favorably. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this 

application or the proposed project, please do not hesitate to contact my office. 

Sincerely, 

/(fety ^Lij 

Kathy C. Hochul 

Member of Congress 

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (5.37 MB)

Tags:Fort Bliss, Iron Soldiers, Soldiers, Army, Training, Engineers, Engineer, Bradley Fighting Vehicle, Army Soldiers, Ram Focus, combat training, defensive perimeter

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of
China  Medicine  Corporation  (the  "Company"),  for the  purposes  of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2006 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May __, 2006

/s/ Senshan Yang
--------------------------------
Senshan Yang
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Huizhen Yu
--------------------------------
Huizhen Yu
Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000852220
<NAME> ALLSTATE FINANCILA CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1624899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 39462302
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2478972
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              43284924
<PP&E>                                         1123269
<DEPRECIATION>                                  586630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                45939431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         18365815
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         40000
<OTHER-SE>                                    22486537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  45939431
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              12404561
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6572477
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               5878167
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1606561
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1652644)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (611500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1041144)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1041144)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.45)


</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.23 MB)

Tags:DSCC, Commander, golf, Eagle Eye

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
ENTRY REMOVED AS

ENTERED IN ERROR
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 194/2006

of 3 February 2006         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 February 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 February 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 3 February 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.65 MB)

Tags:Loglines, DLA Distribution, November 2018, Industrial Hardware Team

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1397

MY ’ KA EL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. R. HARRIS, Judicial Official; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; MECKLENBURG COUNTY , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Robert J. Conrad, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:20

- cv
- 00016

- RJC

- DSC )

Submitted : June 11, 2020 Decided: August 7, 2020

Before WYNN , HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
My ’ Ka El , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: My’Ka El seeks to appeal the district court’s order dis missing his civil action in part and granting him 30 days within which to file an amended complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (201 8 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2 01 8 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order El seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny El’s motion for the appointme nt of counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
exhibit-10_1.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 


ADDENDUM TO


EXECUTIVE RETENTION AGREEMENT







In connection with that Executive Retention Agreement (“Agreement”) executed between Kinetic Concepts, Inc. (the “Company”) and Marty Landon (“Executive”) and dated as of  February 6, 2007, the Company and Executive have agreed that in order for the Agreement to comply with the provisions of Section 409A ("Section 409A") of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") and the regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder so as not to subject Executive to the payment of additional taxes and interest under Section 409A, the following changes to the Agreement (in bold) have been made effective as of March 19, 2010:







Good Reason.  "Good Reason" shall mean one or more of the following:  (i) the material reduction of Executive’s duties and/or responsibilities, which is not cured within 30 days after the Executive provides written notice to the Company; provided, however, it shall not be considered Good Reason if, upon or following a Change in Control, the Executive’s duties and responsibilities remain the same as those prior to the Change in Control but the Executive’s title and/or reporting relationship is changed; (ii) the material reduction of Executive’s base salary (which is not cured within 30 days after the Executive provides written notice), other than across-the-board decreases in base salary applicable to all executive officers of the Company; or (iii) the relocation of the Executive to a business location in excess of fifty (50) miles from the Company’s headquarters in San Antonio (which is not cured within 30 days after the Executive provides written notice). To be considered a resignation from employment on account of Good Reason, the Executive must provide written notice to the Company (stating that Executive believes one or more of the Good Reason conditions described above exists) within 30 days of the initial existence of such condition, and must resign within 30 days of the Company’s failure to cure such condition.








	
6.  

	
Conditions to Severance Benefits.












             (a)  No severance benefits shall be made under Sections 4(a) and (b) unless and until the Executive shall, in consideration of such benefits, execute a full waiver and release of all claims in a form provided by the Company which waiver and release shall be delivered to the Company within 45 days following termination of employment.


 




 



	
  

	
In Witness Whereof, each of the Parties has executed this Addendum, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer:







 




 



	
COMPANY

	
Kinetic Concepts, Inc.


 


By:   /s/ Catherine Burzik  


 


Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer


 


 


	
EXECUTIVE

	
Marty Landon


 


/s/ Martin J. Landon
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [CERCLA-04-2012-3763; FRL 9637-7]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice of Settlement.

# SUMMARY:

Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement for past response costs concerning the Anniston PCB Superfund Site located in Anniston, Calhoun County, Alabama.

# DATES:

The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until March 28, 2012. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

# ADDRESSES:

Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. Painter. Submit your comments by Site name Anniston PCB by one of the following methods:
      - www.epa.gov/​region4/​superfund/​programs/​enforcement/​enforcement.html.
      -  Email. Painter.Paula@epa.gov .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

Dated: February 2, 2012.

Anita L. Davis, 

Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund Division.

[FR Doc. 2012-4482 Filed 2-24-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P