alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I, Erik Levitt, the Chief Executive Officer of Hammer Fiber Optics Holdings Corp., certify, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended April 30, 2020, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

Date: June 22, 2020

 

**Hammer Fiber Optics Holdings Corp.**

 

By: */s/ Erik B. Levitt*

Name: Erik B. Levitt

Title: Chief Executive Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Employment Agreement Update for Sarit Firon



 Exhibit 10.17 

 

 

 January 2010 

Sarit Firon 
 New York 

Dear Sarit: 
 I am pleased to confirm the
compensation approved for you by the Compensation Committee of the Board. It is effective January 1, 2010 
  

							
	 	  	2010	  	2009
	 Annual Salary
	  	$	250,000	  	$	212,000
	 Quarterly Bonus
	  	 	16,000	  	 	16,000
	 Commission OTE
	  	 	40,000	  	 	24,400
		  	 	 	  	 	 
	 Total 2010 Compensation
	  	$	354,000	  	$	300,400

 Your Commission is based on the
Global Revenue target for 2010 of $80,000,000. Your commission rate is 0.050%. Should Eyeblaster exceed the revenue target your commission rate on the amount that exceeds will be 0.075% 

The Committee also approved an option grant of 15,000 for you. Details and documents on the grant will come to you in the next several weeks 

 

	
	All the best,
	
	/s/ Gal Trifon
	 Gal Trifon

CEO


  

	cc:	Maureen McGovern
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 14181-000; Project No. 14195-000]

On February 22, 2012, the Commission held a drawing to determine priority among competing preliminary permit applications with identical filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that none of the applicants' plans are better adapted than the others to develop, conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the region at issue, the priority established by this drawing will serve as the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order of priority is as follows:

1. Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLIII, Project No. 14181-000.

2. FFP Project 53, LLC, Project No. 14195-000.

Dated: February 22, 2012.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-4800 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: L.R.J.P., A MINOR

PETITION OF: T.T., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 75 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: J.M.C.P., A MINOR

PETITION OF: T.T., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 76 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of March, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-2538

Lower Tribunal Nos. 2022-GA-000219 and 2022-MH-002595

_____________________________

CHRISTINE J. LOMAS,

Appellant, 

v.

IN RE: PETER PAPPAS, an alleged incapacitated person, and GEORGE PAPPAS,

emergency temporary guardian,

Appellees.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Alice L. Blackwell, Judge.

April 9, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

NARDELLA, WHITE and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Christine Lomas, of LomasLaw, P.A., Winter Park, pro se. 

Brandon Tyson, of Tyson Law Firm, LLC, Winter Park, for Appellees.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, Kevin Rich, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, DB Commodity Services LLC (the Managing Owner), of DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kevin Rich         
|Kevin Rich             
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|May 18, 2006           



E-4
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.2.2


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment to the September 17, 1999 Employment Agreement (as amended from time to time, the “Employment Agreement”) between East West Bancorp, Inc. (“Company”) and Douglas Krause (“Employee”) is entered into as of this 27th day of February, 2015 by and between Company and Employee.


The Following terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement are hereby modified:


		
	1.
	Section 3.1 (Term) of the Agreement is hereby modified in its entirety to read as follows: This Agreement and employment under this Agreement shall terminate on February 27, 2018 unless extended by Company.




		
	2.
	Except as expressly agreed to herein, the Employment Agreement between the parties shall remain in force and effect.




	
		
	 
	EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.

	 
	/s/ GARY TEO

	 
	Gary Teo

	 
	Head of Human Resources

	 
	 

	 
	/s/ DOUGLAS P. KRAUSE

	 
	Employee: Douglas P. Krause
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHULAN LIANG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 14-70130

Agency No. A201-004-569

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 26, 2016**

Before: McKEOWN, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Shulan Liang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum and 

withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 2 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-70130

review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the 

standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID 

Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the 

petition for review.

The BIA affirmed the IJ’s adverse credibility determination based on a lack 

of candor, implausibilities, and inconsistencies between Liang’s testimony and the 

evidence. Substantial evidence supports the adverse credibility determination 

under the totality of circumstances. See id. at 1048; see also Singh-Kaur v. INS, 

183 F.3d 1147, 1153 (9th Cir. 1999) (“In the circumstances, the IJ reasonably 

resolved her doubt against Petitioner, who bore the burden of proof.”). Liang’s 

explanations do not compel the contrary result. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 

1245 (9th Cir. 2000). Thus, in the absence of credible testimony, Liang’s asylum 

and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 

1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.5 MB)

Tags:Naval Facilities Engineering Command Hawaii, Loglines, January 2019, fuel oil reclaimed

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT








I,
      Howard
      Mah, Chief Financial Officer of Victoria Bay Asset Management, LLC, the general
      partner of United States Oil Fund, LP (the "Registrant"), certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
      The
      quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the fiscal quarter ended
      September 30, 2007 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of  Section  13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.











Date:  November
      13, 2007














/s/
      Howard Mah


Howard
      Mah


Chief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                     EXHIBIT 27.1

                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

                            CORPORATE REALTY INCOME TRUST I

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
AS REPORTED ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                  834,489
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        937,014
<PP&E>                                               32,600,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                        5,054,542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       30,585,114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   446,149
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                                101,078
<OTHER-SE>                                           14,633,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         30,585,114
<SALES>                                               3,423,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      3,459,966
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      1,142,892
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    1,407,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         909,193
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                            909,193
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               .90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               .90

</TABLE>
Initial Sustainability

Advice Letter

National Advisory Council on Environmental 

Policy and Technology

March 26, 2012
Charge - Part 1

Should EPA adopt the National Academies 

recommendation to incorporate sustainability into 

its decision making processes?

If yes;

How should the Agency include sustainability in its 

vision and mission?

What are the key points that should be included in a 

sustainability vision?

What are the critical steps necessary to implement 

sustainability principles and processes into its programs 

and practices?
Should EPA adopt the National Academies 

recommendation to incorporate sustainability 

into its decision making processes?

In keeping with NEPA mandate

Responsive to Executive Order 13514

Aligns EPA with global sustainability 

movement
Benefits to EPA

Encourages a search for innovative win-win 

triple bottom line approaches

Builds EPA’s capacity to work with other 

organizations in dealing with complex, crosscutting problems

Reinforces a focus on sustainability among 

all stakeholders
How should the Agency include 

sustainability in its vision and mission?

Emphasize a Sustainability Vision designed 

to raise people’s personal aspirations, 

provide a focus for collective activity, create 

a big picture of ‘what we are about’
Key Points for a

Sustainability Vision

Further environmental, social & economic 

goals as much as possible at the same time

Protect ecological foundations

Ensure everyone enjoys protection

Meet current needs in ways which ensure 

future generations can meet theirs

Facilitate transition to environmentally superior 

technologies
Key Points for a

Sustainability Vision

Remain competitive with regulatory standards 

that acknowledge capital constraints & cycles

Avoid significant irreversible adverse impacts 

on the environment & natural cycles

Manage release of toxics to prevent exceeding 

assimilative capacity of environment

Ensure renewable resources are regenerated

Use nonrenewable resources efficiently, 

recycle, track depletion, develop substitutes 
Initial Thoughts on EPA Actions

Incorporate current risk-based paradigm 

into a larger sustainability paradigm

Emphasize whole system thinking

Emphasize the “social” aspect of 

sustainability

Hire people proficient in more than one 

discipline

Emphasize sustainability-related R&D
Initial Thoughts on EPA Actions

Coordinate extensively with other 

agencies & relevant organizations

Build a “sustainability toolbox”

Create a “dashboard of progress”

Develop an environmental scanning 

system & targeted foresight studies

Foster a continuous learning culture
Critical Steps

Adopt a comprehensive “sustainability 

framework”

Establish an Agency-wide vision, use 

it as touchstone to set long-term goals & to 

“backcast’ intermediate goals 

Establish several 3-5 year ‘breakthrough 

objectives”

In the next 5 years, develop: 

Assessment & management strategy and analytical 

tools for applying it

 Measurements for assessing progress & a regular 

process of public reporting

Agency-wide scanning process
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.25 MB)

Tags:PWD, Global Posture, French SEA, Strong Partnerships, Warfighter First

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Form of Letter Agreement with the Named Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.11 

January [    ], 2010 
 Dear
[    ]: 
 You are receiving this letter agreement in reference to the long-term equity incentive awards
that you are eligible to receive from time to time in the discretion of the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(the “Company”). By signing below, you acknowledge and agree that, with respect to any long-term equity incentive awards that may be granted to you in connection with the Company’s regular 2010 long-term incentive
grant cycle, the grant date of any portion of such award that consists of performance-vested restricted stock may be deferred at the option of the Company until after the Company’s 2010 Annual General Meeting of shareholders, at which time the
Company plans to submit for shareholder approval a new performance-based equity incentive plan (the “Proposed Plan”). If the Proposed Plan is adopted by the shareholders, such deferred portion of your 2010 long-term equity
incentive award will be granted thereunder. Otherwise, such deferred portion will be granted under the Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Notwithstanding the deferral of any award grant pursuant to the terms hereof, the amount and value of
any deferred portion of your 2010 long-term equity incentive award shall be calculated as if granted pursuant to the Company’s regular grant practices (i.e., on March 1, 2010), and to the extent any extraordinary event occurs
between March 1, 2010, and the actual grant date for your award, you will be economically protected such that the economic result to you in respect of such award will be the same as if the award were granted to you on March 1, 2010.

 Consistent with the terms of your employment agreement with the Company, this letter agreement does not guarantee any
long-term equity incentive grant for 2010, and the determination of whether to grant such an award to you remains in the discretion of the Committee. Please indicate your agreement to and acceptance of the terms of this letter agreement by signing
below. 
 Sincerely, 
  

	
	Agreed and accepted:
	
	  
	[Name]
	
	  
	Date