alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.9 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Distribution Headquarters, DLA Land and Maritime, DLA employees, In-House Coaching Program

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne  Institutional/Pension  Energy Income P-1 Limited Partnership ("Issuer")
for the  period  ending  December  31,  2005 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 29th day of March, 2006.

                                    GEODYNE INSTITUTIONAL/PENSION ENERGY INCOME
                                    P-1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Seven, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of June 30, 2008, and for the period then ended.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ GLADE M. KNIGHT    
|Glade M. Knight        
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|August 4, 2008         
|                       
|/s/ BRYAN PEERY        
|Bryan Peery            
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|August 4, 2008         



25
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10752-10753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4168]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0129]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request; General Licensing Provisions; Section 351(k) 
Biosimilar Applications; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice 
that appeared in the Federal Register of February 15, 2012 (77 FR 
8880). The document announced an opportunity for public comment on the 
proposed collection of certain information by the Agency. The document 
was published with an incorrect docket number. This document corrects 
that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Joyce Strong, Office of Policy, Food 
and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, rm. 3208,

[[Page 10753]]

Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-9148.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2012-3548, appearing on page 
8880, in the Federal Register of Wednesday, February 15, 2012, the 
following correction is made:
    On page 8880, in the second column, in the Docket No. heading, 
``[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-1029]'' is corrected to read ``[Docket No. 
FDA-2012-N-0129]''.

    Dated: February 16, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-4168 Filed 2-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
---

Exhibit 12.1


2 0 1 2   F O R M - 2 0 F    E X H I B I T - 12.1 SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONSThe disclosure required to be filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 is included below in this Exhibit-12.2 in the form required as Certificates by the Company's CEO. CEO CERTIFICATE I, Richard L. McAdoo, certify that: 1.

   I have reviewed and read this annual report on Form-20F of Continental Energy Corporation (the “Company”);2.

   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.

   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.

   The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: (a)

   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(c)

   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)

   disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered y the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5.

   The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluations of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a)

   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)

   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Dated: November 9, 2012 <Signed> __________________ Richard L. McAdoo CEO


---
#### ST. MARY’S CHURCH & MISSION, and the Archdiocese of Denver c/o Gallagher Bassett Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF the STATE OF COLORADO, and Barbara Jean Price, Respondents.

No. 87SC29.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

April 29, 1988.

Rehearing Denied May 23, 1988.*

*

 Justice ROVIRA would grant.

*770ORDER OF COURT

Upon consideration of the oral argument by counsel and the briefs and record submitted in the above cause, and now being sufficiently advised in the premises,

IT IS THIS DAY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is DENIED as having been improvidently granted.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FNANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly report of Frezer, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:May 17, 2006



|By: | /s/ David Koos                
|--- | ------------------------------
|    | David Koos                    
|    | Acting Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or othr document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Frezer, Inc. and will be retained by Frezer, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

** PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

I, Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President, in connection with the Quarterly Reportof CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     The Quarterly Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     The informationcontained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:November 10, 2016

|   |                                                                                                                      |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Michael A. Reisner

Michael  A. Reisner  Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President

*(Principal Executive Officer)* |
|   | CĪON  Investment Corporation                                                                                         |

 

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Redpoint BioCorporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, Scott M. Horvitz, Chief Financial and Operating Officer andTreasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  August 13, 2009 | /s/ Scott M. Horvitz                                                     |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Scott M Horvitz                                                          |
|                         | Chief Financial and Operating Officer  and Treasurer |
|                         | (Principal Financial  and Accounting Officer)                            |

 

----

*                           A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Redpoint BioCorporation and will be retained by Redpoint Bio Corporation and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7550

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

CARLOS WOODS, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District 

Judge. (1:07-cr-00127-WDQ-1) 

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Carlos Woods, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., 

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Carlos Woods appeals from the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction 

of sentence based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. 

Although Amendment 782 to the Guidelines lowered offense levels 

applicable to drug offenses by two levels and is retroactively 

applicable, see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(d), 

p.s. (2016); USSG app. C, amend. 782, Woods was determined to be 

a career offender under the Guidelines, and his status as a 

career offender is not affected by Amendment 782. Because 

Amendment 782 “does not have the effect of lowering [Woods’] 

applicable guideline range because of the operation of another 

guideline or statutory provision,” USSG § 1B1.10, p.s., cmt. 

n.1(A), he was not entitled to a sentence reduction under 

§ 3582(c)(2). The district court thus did not reversibly err in 

denying Woods’ motion. See USSG § 1B1.10(a)(2)(B), p.s.; United 

States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010), abrogation on 

other grounds recognized in United States v. Muldrow, ___ F.3d 

___, Nos. 15-7298, 15-7608, 2016 WL 7441620, at **3-6 (4th Cir. 

Dec. 27, 2016). 

Accordingly, although we grant Woods’ motion to file a 

supplemental informal opening brief, we affirm the district 

court’s denial order. United States v. Woods, No. 

1:07-cr-00127-WDQ-1 (D. Md. Oct. 21, 2016). We deny Woods’ 
3

motions to appoint counsel and for a transcript at government 

expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
|   | (i) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June      30, 2008 (the “Form      10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C.      78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Dated:      August 8, 2008 |
|--------|----------------------------|

|                            |
|---------------------------------|
| /S/      ZACHARY      M. GRAVES |
| Zachary      M. Graves          |
| Chief      Financial Officer    |
<PAGE>



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


The Board of Directors
Pinnacle Financial Services, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement of Form
S-8 (Registration Statement Number 33-8488) of Pinnacle Financial Services,
Inc. of our report dated March 3, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Pinnacle Financial Services, Inc. and its subsidiary as of December
31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes
in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1996
annual report on Form 10-K of Pinnacle Financial Services, Inc.


                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 28, 1997
**Exhibit 23**

 

# **Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

 

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-118718) pertainingto the 2004 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, 2004 Stock IncentivePlan, Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, and IndividualStock Option Agreements of Thermadyne Holdings Corporation of our reports datedMarch 30, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofThermadyne Holdings Corporation, Thermadyne Holdings Corporation management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofThermadyne Holdings Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) forthe year ended December 31, 2004.

 

 
|                 | /s/ Ernst  & Young LLP |   |
|----------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                 |                       |
|                 |                       |
| St. Louis,  Missouri |                       |
| March 30,  2005      |                       |

 

----

** **
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-4030

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

DAVID WILLIAMS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:06-

cr-00591-AMD-1) 

Submitted: October 27, 2009 Decided: November 23, 2009 

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Joanna Silver, Assistant 

Federal Public Defender, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. 

Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, James G. Warwick, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Following a bench trial, David Williams was convicted 

of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2006), and sentenced to 262 months in 

prison. Williams appeals, contending that his sentence is 

procedurally unreasonable because the district court 

miscalculated his guidelines range and treated the guidelines as 

mandatory. Finding his claims meritless, we affirm. 

 We review a sentence for reasonableness under an abuse 

of discretion standard. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, __, 

128 S. Ct. 586, 597 (2007). This review requires appellate 

consideration of both the procedural and substantive 

reasonableness of a sentence. Id. In this case, Williams 

challenges only the procedural reasonableness of his sentence. 

 In determining whether a sentence is procedurally 

reasonable, we first assess whether the district court properly 

calculated the defendant’s advisory guidelines range. Id. at 

596-97. We then determine whether the district court failed to 

consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006) factors and any 

arguments presented by the parties, selected a sentence based on 

“clearly erroneous facts,” or failed to sufficiently explain the 

selected sentence. Id. at 597. 

 Williams asserts that the district court miscalculated 

his guidelines range because it incorrectly believed that it 

2 
3 

could impose an obstruction of justice enhancement. However, 

the court did not apply such an enhancement. Therefore, 

Williams is not entitled to relief on this claim. 

 Williams also argues that his sentence is procedurally 

unreasonable because the district court treated the guidelines 

as mandatory by imposing a within-guidelines sentence after 

repeated remarks that the guidelines range was too long. This 

claim is belied by the record, which shows that the court also 

noted that Williams had earned that guidelines range and that a 

sentence within that range was necessary to satisfy the goals of 

sentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). 

 Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED