FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P E A LS E LE V EN T HC IRC U IT JUNE 22 , 2006 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 15728 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 2 - 0 0 2 5 9 - CR- T- 2 6 - M SS U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s S Y L V E S T E R E U G E N E B E N N E T T , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( Ju n e 22, 2006) B efo re T JO F L A T , A N D E R S O N an d B IR C H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M:2

T hi s c a s e i s be f

or e us f orthe thi r d t i m e . I n U ni t e d S t a t e s v. B e nne tt , N o. 02- 16868 ( de c i de d J ul y 28, 2003) ( unpubl i s he d) , w e a f f i r m e d appe l l a nt ’ s pr i s on s e nt e nc e of

216 m onths f

orc om m i tt i ng ba nk r obbe ry i n vi ol a t i on of 18 U . S . C . §§ 21 13 (a ) a nd (d). In ou r opi ni on , w e not ed that“ [a ] pp el l anti s aca re eroffe nd er . ” A p p e lla n t th e r e a f

te rm o v e d th e d is tr ic t c o u r t p u r s u a n t 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 5 to v a c a te hi s s e nt e nc e on the gr ound tha the s houl d notha ve be e n c onvi c t e d of vi ol a t i ng 18 U . S . C . § 2 11 3(d) because , i n p l ea di ng gu i l ty, he di d n otadm i tthe el em ent s of § 21 13 (d), spec i fi ca l l y, thatthe offens e i nv ol ved “ a dangerous w eapo n o r devi ce . ” T he G ove rnm e ntc onf

e s s e d e rr or , s t a t i ng tha tappe l l a nt ’ s c onvi c t i on s houl d ha ve b e e n u n d e r1 8 U. S . C . § 2 1 1 3 ( a ) o n l y , s o th e c o u r tv a c a t e d ap p e l l a n t ’ s s e n t e n c e . At the s ubs e que ntr e s e nt e nc i ng he a r i ng, the c our t , a dhe r e d t o i t s pr e vi ous d e te r m in a tio n th a t ap p e lla n t w a s a c a r e e ro f f e n d e ra n d th is tim e s e n te n c e d h im to p r is o n f o ra te r m o f

1 6 9 m o n th s . A p p e lla n t ap p e a le d th is s e n te n c e , c o n te n d in g th a t th e c o u r t im p o s e d it in vi ol a t i on of

U ni t e d S t a t e s v. B ooke r , 543 U . S . ____, 125 S . C t . 738, 160 L . E d. 2d 62 1 (20 05 ). A ft erconcl ud i ng thatthe di stri ctcourthad p roperl y det erm i ned appe l l a nt ’ s s e nt e nc e r a nge unde rthe G ui de l i ne s – i n pa rt i c ul a r , by c l a s s i f y i ng appel l antas a c ar ee r off ender – w e f

ou nd B oo ker s t atut ory e rr or because the court ha d tr e a t e d the G ui de l i ne s a s m a nda t ory , r a the rtha n a dvi s or y . S i nc e theAppe lla nt admitte d at sentenc ingthat th ec halleng e d p ri or co nv ictionswerevalid . H is 1 objection was, by

his own admission, an attempt collaterally to attack the c onvictions. 3 G ov ernm entw as un abl e t o d em on stra t e thatthe error w as harm l es s, w e vac at ed appe l l a nt ’ s s e nt e nc e a nd r e m a nde d the c a s e f orr e s e nt e nc i ng. U ni t e d S t a t e s v. H i gh t ow er , N o. 04 -163 58 (dec i ded Jul y 28, 20 05 ) ( un pu bl i shed). O n r e s e nt e nc i ng, appe l l a ntobj e c t e d t o hi s c a r e e rof f e nde rc l a s s i f

i c a t i on on the gr ound tha tthe i ndi c tm e ntf a i l e d t o a l l e ge tha the w a s a c a r e e rof f e nde ra s , he c ont e nde d, B ooke rr e qui r e s . T he c our tove rrul e d hi s obj e c t i on, a nd a tthe c onc l us i on of

the he a r i ng, s e nt e nc e d hi m t o pr i s on f ora t e r m of

151 m onths , a tthe l ow end o f the G ui del i nes s ent ence ra ng e. H e now appeal s thatse nt ence , r e ite r a tin g th e o b

je c tio n h e p r e s e n te d to th e d is tr ic t c o u r t – th a t, u n d e rB o o k e r , h is p r io rc o n v ic tio n s s h o u ld h a v e b e e n a lle g e d in th e in d ic tm e n t. 1 T h e la w - o f

- th e - c a s e d o c tr in e f

o r e c lo s e s ap p e lla n t’s B o o k e ro b je c tio n . I n h is p r io rap p e a l, N o . 0 4 - 1 6 3 5 8 , ap p e lla n t a r g u e d th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t e rr e d in cl as si fy i ng hi m as a c ar ee r off ender. W e r ej ec t ed hi s a rgum ent , and t he di stri ct c o u r t, o b e y in g o u rm a n d a te , p r o p e r ly r e s e n te n c e d h im a s s u c h . AF F I R ME D.