March 25, 2013

Page **1** of **25 SUPPORTING STATEMENT**  **FOR AN INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST (ICR)** 
**1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION**  **1(a). Title of the Information Collection**  Soil Fumigant Risk Mitigation OMB Control No.: 2070

-NEW EPA No.: 2451.01 **1(b). Short Characterization/Abstract**  This new information collection request (I CR) will ensure that for certain soil fumigant chemicals, risk mitigation measures necessary for reregistration eligibility are adequatel y implemented. In May

2008, the Environmental Protection Agency (“ EPA ” or “the A gency”) completed Reregistration Eligibility Decisions (REDs) for a group of soil fumigant chemicals after an extensive review and public participation process. The Agency ’s decision takes into account the best available information on the potential risks and benefits of soil fumigant use. EPA published the final decision documents for public comment, and issued final RED s in June 2009. The Agency

has determined that certain uses of these soil fumigants are eligible for reregistration, provided that the risk mitigation measures outlined in the REDs are adopted. The required mitigation measures may result in a burden , a

pplicable under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), on those participating in soil fumigant applications, on those enforc ing soil fumigant label requirements, and on the registrants of soil fumigant products. These measures are designed to decrease the likelihood of exposures to these chemicals while maintaining important benefits to United States (U

. S .) agriculture. To ensure that risk mitigation measures are adequatel y implemented, the respondents identified below must complete the following activities :

 Users

– Users of soil fumigants include both certified applicators and pesticide handlers. Applicators must understand the new requirements , complete application information on posting signs , provide notice of fumigant applications to applicable states , prepare a Fumigant Management Plan (FMP) and Post

- Application Summary (PAS), participate in an EPA

- approved fumigant training program , and disseminate fumigant safe handling information to handlers. Handlers may help in the posting of buffer zone signs, and must also complete a fumigant training program.

 Registrants

– Registrants of soil fumigant products must develop and implement training for fumigators in charge of fumigations , develop and disseminate safety information for handlers, develop and implement community outreach and education programs, and develop and implement first responder training.

 States

– States are involved in the enforcement of soil fumigant label requirements, and would receive notification of fumigations in their state if they have selected this option.March 25, 2013

Page **2** of **25** Without the complete suite of measures, these chemicals do not meet the requirements to be eligible for reregi stration under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)

. The programs and activities represented in this I CR are the result of the Agency exercising the authority

of s ection 3(c)(2)(B) or s ection 3(c)(5) of FIFRA, which authorizes EP A to require pesticide registrants to generate and submit data to the Agency , when such data are needed to maintain an existing registration of a pesticide. Due to the high benefits to agriculture from these chemicals, there could be significant economic impact if soil fumigant products are no longer available to American farmers.
**2. NEED FOR AND USE OF THE COLLECTION 2(a).**  **Need/Authority for the Collection** EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), under the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) , will use the information collected under this ICR to ensure that risk mitigation measures for certain soil fumigant chemicals necessary for reregistration eligibility are adequatel y implemented. The programs and activities represented in this new I CR are the result of the Agency exercising the authority

of s ection 3(c)(2)(B) (Attachment A) or s ection 3(c)(5) (Attachment B ) of FIFRA, which authorizes EPA to require pesticide registrants to generate and submit data to the Agency when such data are needed to maintain an existing registration of a pesticide.
Sec tions 3(a) and 12(a)(1) of FIFRA require a person to register a pesticide product with the EPA before the pesticide product may be lawfully

sold or distributed in the U.S . A pesti cide registration is a license that allows a pesticide product to be sold and distributed for specific uses under specified terms and conditions such as use instructions and precautions. The proponent of initial or continued registration always bears the burden of demonstrating that a pesticide product meets the statutory

standard for registration. A pesticide product may be registered or remain registered onl y if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in section 3(c)(5) of FIFRA, which is as follows: (A) Its composition is such as to warrant the proposed claims for it. (B) Its labeling and other material required to be submitted comply with the requirements of this Act. (C) It will perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on the environment. (D) When used in accordance with widespread and commonly recognized practice it will not generally

cause unreasonable adverse effects on the environment. Section 2(bb) of FIFRA defines “unreasonable adverse effects on the environment'' as (1) “any unreasonable risk to man or the environment, taking into account the economic, social, and environmental costs and benefits of the use of any pesticide, or (2) a human dietary risk from residues that result from a use of a pesticide in or on any f ood inconsistent with the standard under section 408 of the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act.'' Section 4 of FIFRA requires EPA to reassess the health and safety data for all pesticideMarch 25, 2013

Page **3** of **25** active ingredients registered before November 1, 1984, to determine whether these “older” pesticides meet the criteria for registration that would be expected of a pesticide being registered today for the first time. Section 4 directs EPA to use s ection 3 (c)(2)(B) authority to obtain the required data. Section 4( g)(2)(A) of FIFRA calls for EPA to determine, after submission of relevant data concerning an active ingredient, whether pesticides containing the active ingredient are eligible for reregistration

. EPA completed REDs for a group of soil fumigant chemicals in May 2008 after an extensive review and public participation process. The Agency’s decision takes into account the best available information on the potential risks and benefits of soil fumi gant use. EPA published the final decision documents for public comment, and issued final REDs in June 2009. The chemicals included in this review are metam sodium/potassium, dazomet, chloropicrin, and methyl bromide. Preceding the REDs for these chemic als, the Agency had also completed a RED for another soil fumigant, 1,3

- dichloropropene (Telone ®), in 1998

. In addition to these chemicals, the soil fumigant dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) was registered in July 2010

. EPA considered the se soil fumigants as a group in order to ensure that similar risk assessment tools and methods were used for all and that risk management approaches were consistent. Documents to support the reregistration or registration actions for this group of chemicals can be found in the public docket at www.regulations.gov under the following docket numbers: EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2005

- 0123 (methylbromide), EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2005

- 0124 (1,3

- dichloropropene), EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2005

- 0125 (metam sodium/p otassium), EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2005

- 0128 (dazomet), EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2007

- 0350 (chloropicrin), and EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2007

- 0092 (DMDS). Attachment C lists these chemicals and the docket numbers. The Agency

has determined that certain uses of these soil fumigants are eligible for reregistration, provided that the same risk mitigation measures outlined in the REDs are adopted. EPA is requiring a suite of complementary mitigation measures to protect handlers, reentry workers, and b ys tanders from risks resulting from exposure to the soil fumigant s . While these measures are designed to work together to address all risks, the new mitigation measures have a specific focus on the acute human inhalation risks that have been identified in the revised risk assessments for these fumigants . This I CR accounts for the additional risk mitigation activities outlined in the REDs that are applicable under the P RA, and documents the respondent burden and costs for these activities

. In addition, when the new soil fumigant DMDS was registered in 2010 , the conditions of the registration required products containing this active ingredient to include the same risk mitigation measures to those that were required in the REDs for the other chemicals. Similarly , these measures are required to ensure handlers, reentry workers, and by standers who may be exposed to soil fumigants are protected. Without the complete suite of measures, these chemic als do not meet the eligibility requirements for reregistration under FIFRA. EPA may determine that products containing these chemicals do not meet the 3(c)(5) standard for registration under FIFRA

. Due to the high benefits to agriculture, there could be significant economic impact if soil fumigant products are no longer available.March 25, 2013

Page **4** of **25 2(b).**  **Practical Utility/Uses of the Data Background on Soil Fumigants**  Soil fumigants are pesticides that, when applied to soil, form a gas to control pests that live in th e soil and can disrupt plant growth and crop production. The fumigants are either volatile chemicals that become gases at relativel y l ow temperatures, around 40 degrees Fahrenheit, or they

are chemicals that react to produce such a gas (e.g., dazomet and metam sodium converting to methyl isothiocyanate , or MITC). Soil fumigants are used on many high value crops, including vegetables, fruits, nuts, forest seedlings, ornamentals, and nursery crops, to control a wide range of pests including nematodes, fungi, bacteria, insects, and weeds. Benefit s anal ys es have indicate d that fumigant use is important in a variety of crops . I f these fumigants could not be used, there would likel y be significant negative economic impacts. Because of the broad range of pests controlled, soil fumigants are used as part of the production of a wide variety of crops and provide high benefits for many growers. As gases, however, fumigants move from the soil to the air at the application site and may pose risks to handlers, re

- entry

workers, and by standers

. To reduce these exposures and address risks of concern, the Agency

has required a number of mitigation measures designed to work together to address all risks, but focus on the acute human inhalation risks that have been identified in the revised risk assessments for these fumigants. Bystanders, who are not involved in the fumigant application but who live, work, go to school, or are otherwise located in nearb y areas, may be exposed to airborne fumigants that move off the application site. Bystanders also include agricultural workers in nearb y fields who are not involved with the fumigant application. Incidents of by stander exposure demonstrate that fumigants have the potential to move off site at concentrations that produce adverse health effects in humans, over periods of several hours to day s after application. These health effects may range from mild and reversible eye irritation to more severe and irreversible effects, depending on the fumigant and the level of exposure. The Agency

is requiring a number of mitigation measures (as described in Section 4 of this document) that may

result in a burden to those participating in soil fumigant applications, to those enforc ing soil fumigant label requirements, and to those who regist er soil fumigant products. These measures are designed to decrease the likelihood of exposures to these chemicals while maintaining their benefits to U

. S

. agriculture. For example , measures such as FMPs are designed to reduce workplace injuries and accidents b y prescribing a series of operational requirements and criteria. Also, training is required to ensure applicators across the country receive the same basic level of information prior to making an application. Although there are some areas of the country where training is currentl y available from state s or registrants, there is currently no consistent training standard across states and regions where soil fumigation is conducted . For the most part , people living and working near areas where fumigation is taking place do not have much knowledge about these typ es of applications. In several incidents , even emergency first responders who have responded to incidents involvingMarch 25, 2013

Page **5** of **25** soil fumigants do not understand the unique chemical properties of these chemicals and have in some cases increased the exposure of by standers to these chemicals following an incident. 1 In general, m ore information on the soil fumigants , including links to all of the public comments received during the reregistration process for this group of chemicals , can be found at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/index.htm

. **3. NON** 
**- DUPLICATION, CONSULTATIONS, AND OTHER COLLECTION** 

**CRITERIA 3(a).**  **Non**
**- duplication**  Respondents will not be asked to collect or provide information that has been or is currentl y being collected by EPA, other federal or state agencies or proprietary sources , or is available elsewhere . The information collected is unique and is not duplicative of previous information collection req uests. **3(b). Public Notice**  Pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d), EPA publish ed a Federal Register (FR) Notice (77 FR 39699, July

5, 2012) announcing this proposed information collection activity and provide d a 60

- day public comment period. The A gency established a public docket for this proposal, which can be accessed at http://www.regulations.gov using the docket identifier **EP A** 
**- HQ** 
**- OPP** 
**- 2011** 
**- 1036** 

. The A gency did not receive any comments during the public comment period. **3(c). Consultation Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB**  In addition to the public notice publish ed in the Federal Register concerning the development of this I CR, the Agency has and will continue to consult with stakeholders and respondents who actively interact with the Agency. For example, in developing the REDs the Agency used a thorough, multi

- step , comprehensive process to elicit public comment, provide responses, and revise the decisions as appropriate. Starting in 2004 , EPA held a series of public meetings to discuss the proposed risk assessment methods which the Agency then used to develop draft risk assessments. In 2005, EPA incorporated new modeling tools developed by industry and reviewed by the Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) into the risk assessments, presented the preliminary risk assessments at another public meeting, and opened the first public comment period soliciting comments on the Agency ’s assessment. In 2007, EPA issued responses to public comments on the revised risk and benefits assessments, and issued risk mitigation proposals for public comment. EPA then held a series of public meetings around the country to get input on the risk mitigation proposals. Then in 2008 , EPA published REDs for public comment. The REDs showed label statements that would be used to mitigate risks and how the new measures would be implemented. In 2009, EPA published amended REDs that were revised based on public comments on the 2008 REDs. EPA continues to work closel y with stakeholders to help ensure new label changes are implemented in a timely manner, and that

1 Summary Fumigants Group Incident Report. R. Allen. 4/17/07. http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2005

- 0125

- 0075March 25, 2013

Page **6** of **25** users and enforcement personnel are prepared when these changes take effect. For more information, EPA’s fumigant webpage 2 contains a number of implementation resources as well as background information on these decisions.
B efore sending this ICR to OMB for review and approval, EPA staff contact ed five representatives from a cross

- section of respondents to seek feedback on the burden estimates in the I CR, the clarity of instructions provided, and other questions pertaining to the requirements of the program. Based on the comments received during the consultation process, EPA has made changes to the original burden estimates in section 6 of this supporting statement. EPA has summarized those comments and describes how EPA has changed its original estimates below. For representatives’ c ontact information and their complete responses to the consultation questions, please see Attachment D

. First, in the original suppor ting statement, EPA did not specify additional capital or operation and maintenance costs. Several of the representatives commented that EPA should consider the costs associated with creating buffer zone signs . Additionally, several commenters also sugges ted that there are costs associated with purchasing air monitoring equipment that EPA did not address . EPA agrees that these are additional costs, and has accounted for them in section 6(b)(1)(a) of the supporting statement. None of the representatives provide d estimates for costs associated with these items , so EPA has provided an estimate for each of these based off of current market prices for the materials and equipment

. Second, in the original supporting statement, EPA had indicated that it would take approximately

30 minutes to post buffer zone signs (see Table 6). Several commenters suggested that this was too short of a time to post signs for buffer zones. These commenters suggested that it could take anywhere from 1 to 2 hours to post the neces sary signs. EPA has changed its estimate from 30 minutes to 1 hour based on these recommendations , accounting for the time it takes to both post and remove these signs after the buffer zone time period has expired. Third, one commenter stated that EPA did not assign a cost to the distribution of training materials listed in Table 10. However, EPA did include the distribution of materials as a “clerical task” in all cases , so the time associated with this activity is liste d in the “clerical” column

. In reviewing the initial supporting statement and representative comments pertaining to this particular , EPA has decided to include 10 hours under the “technical ” category for that activity in addition to the time accounted for in the “clerical” category . EPA has also changed the name of that activity

from “Distribute Training M aterials” to “Maintain/Distribute Training M aterials

. ” EPA felt that in addition the distribution of training materials at the clerical staff level, te chnical staff will also be needed to ensure that the fumigant training materials for certified applicators is up to date

. EPA also received two comments regarding EPA’s estimate that it takes 30 minutes to read a soil fumigant label (see Table 6). The representatives suggested that it could take 2

- 3 hours to read a soil fumigant label. EPA has changed the activity name to “Understanding requirements,” but it has not changed the burden estimate. Reading the label is the law for all

2 http ://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/index.htmMarch 25, 2013

Page **7** of **25** pesticide products, but the Agency did want to capture the additional time it may take to understand the suite o f fumigant risk mitigation measures. These measures are included on fumigant product labels, but could also be learned in REDs or on EPA’s fumigant webpage. Additio nally , 30 minutes is an average for all soil fumigant applications. Certified applicators will likely

make multiple fumigant applications, oftentimes with the same soil fumigant. The initial application will take more time to understand the requirements as suggested b y the representatives, but EPA believes that subsequent applications will require less time as the certified applicator will already be familiar with the requirements. Therefore, EPA has decided not to change this estimate. For the representative s’ complete responses to the consultation questions, as well as EPA’s responses to those comments, please see Attachment D of this supporting statement. **3(d). Effects of Less Frequent Collection**  The Agency

is not requiring regular reporting on the status of these tasks back to the Agency which will significantly

reduce the burden on the respondents. In formation is reported only when needed, and cannot be collected less frequently and still maintain necessary risk mitigation. For example, certi fied applicators must only give FMP s to state enforcement officials when requested. **3(e). General Guidelines**  The information collection activities discussed in this ICR comply with all regulatory guidelines under 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2). Respondents are required to retain records, but respondents will not be required to retain records for more than 2 ye ars. **3(f). Confidentiality** 
No ne of the information collected b y EPA under this I CR comprises confidential business information. **3(g) Sensitive Questions**  The information collection activities discussed in this document do not involve any sensitive questions.
**4. THE RESPONDENTS AND THE INFORMATION REQUESTED**  **4(a). Respondents/NAICS Codes**  Respondents affected b y the collection activities under this I CR are soil fumigant users , specificall y certified applicators and agriculture pesticide handlers (NAICS 111000

– Agriculture, Forestry , Fishing and Hunting); soil fumigant registrants (NAICS 325300

- Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufa cturing); and state and tribal lead agencies (NAICS 999200

– State Government)

.March 25, 2013

Page **8** of **25** Soil fumigant users subject to the I CR are considered “applicators” and “handlers”. Soil fumigants are onl y allowed to be applied by , or under direct supervision of , special ly trained and certified applicators. Certification programs are conducted by states, territories, and tribes in accordance with national standards . Fumigant handlers are identified as workers working in a fumigant application block or buffer zone that performs certain kinds of tasks as specified on fumigant labels.
U sers of soil fumigants containing the active ingredients listed in Table 1 are subject to the collection activities specified in this I CR

. **Table 1: Active Ingredients Subject to this IC R** 

**Active Ingredient Pesticide Chemical (**  **PC )**  **Code** 1, 3

- dichloropropene 029001 Chloropicrin 081501 Dazomet 035602 DMDS 000011 Metam sodium 039003 Metam potassium 039002 Methyl bromide 053201 Methyl isothiocyanate 068103 **4(b)**
**. Information Collected** 
U sers of soil fumigants will need to engage in the following activities to assure compliance with new fumigant label requirements:
**Table 2**  **: U**  **ser (applicators or handlers) A**  **ctivities Burden**  **Description** Understand the requirements (applicator’s responsibility) Learn/refresh understanding of fumigant requirements

.

While all of the new requirements are on fumigant labels, EPA has also provided information on these requirements at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/index.htm

. Specific links to new requirements are included below. Posting: Fill

- in application information on signs and post buffer zones (applicator or handler’s responsibi lity) Obtain signs from product dealers (provided to dealers b y registrants); fill

in (1) product name, and (2) contact information for the fumigator; place signs at usual points of entry and along likely

routes of approach unless a physical barrier (fence , wall) prevents access to the buffer ; remove signs after buffer zone time period has ended

. In formation on buffer zone posting can be found at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/factsheets/sfm

posting

- 2012.pdf State L ead Agencies ( SLAs ) : Applicators must check the EPA fumigant website for a list of states that

require notification.March 25, 2013

Page **9** of **25** Check EPA website to determine if notice is required and provide notice of applications to applicable SLAs (applicator’s responsibili ty) Provide to the SLA that require notification, the following: contact

information for the fumigator and owner/operator; location of the field to be treated; product name and registration number; and when the fumigation is expected to occur.
In formation on notification to S LAs can be found at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/statenotices/

Fumigant Management Plan (FMP ) : Prepare a FMP and a post

- application s ummary (PAS) (applicator’s responsibility) Prepare a written FMP for each fumigation to include the following:

information on the site, fumigator, and owner/operator; fumigation procedures; buffer determinations; information on worker protection; proced ures for air monitoring, posting, communication among key parties; and record keeping; emergency response plans and procedures for addressing accidental fumigant releases. Results of air monitoring for handlers, air monitoring results between buffers an d bystanders, as well as any deviations from the FMP must be recorded in a PAS

. Both documents must be filed and retained b y both the certified applicator and the property owner for at least 2 years, and available to disclose to enforcement personnel or handlers participating in the application if requested.
In formation on FMPs can be found at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/soil

- fum

mgmt

-plans

- templates.html Applicator Training: Applicators must take registrant developed and EPA approved fumigant training (applicator’s responsibility) Applicators must attend a soil fumigant training program designed

specificall y to cover the following topics: how to correctly

appl y the fumigant, how to protect handlers and bystanders, how to determine buffer zone distances, how to develop an FMP and pos t

- fumigation summary report, how to determine when unfavorable conditions exist, and how to comply with the required GAPs. The applicators participation in the training must be documented in the FMP

. In formation on applicator training can be found at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/soil

- fum

handlers.html#applicators Handler In formation: Handlers must receive fumigant Applicators are responsible for disseminating fumigant specific

information prior to each fumigation to every handler participating in the application.March 25, 2013

Page **10** of **25** specific information (applicator and handler’s responsibilities) In formation on handler information can be found at

http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/soil

- fum

handlers.html#handlers

EPA has included certain aspects of these requirements in the Data Call

- In(DCI) notices that are being sent to the fumigant registrants. The DCI is requiring registrants to submit proposals on how they

are planning to address each of the reregistration requirements liste d below. The registrant’s burden covered in the DCI ICR (OMB Control No. 2070

- 0174) has not been duplicated here. The burden and activities listed below deal with development and implementation of requirements and therefore fall outside of the scope of the DCI ICR

. **Table 3 :**  **R egistrant**  **A ctivities** 

**Burden Description**  Training: Develop/update and implement training for fumigators in charge of fumigations Prepare training materials, develop channels for training fumigators, and design and implement mechanisms for tracking fumigators who successfully complete training. Update training materials periodicall y. Disseminate training materials (either electronic ally , by paper, or in person) As discussed in Table 2, information on applicator training can be found at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/soil

fum

- handlers.html#applicators Handler Information: Develop/update and disseminate safety information for handlers Prepare safety training materials for handlers and make them available to fumigators to provide to fumigant handlers under their supervisio n. Update safety information periodicall y. Disseminate training materials (either electronic ally or by paper) As discussed in table 2, information on handler information can be found at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/soil

fum

- handlers.html#handlers Community

Outreach: Develop/update and implement community outreach and education programs Design and implement outreach programs to provide communities with information about soil fumigants, buffer zones, earl y signs of exposure, and what to do in case of an exposure, emergency , or incident ; Update community

outreach program periodically.
In formation on community outreach can be found at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/soil

fum

- communities.htmlMarch 25, 2013

Page **11** of **25** First Responder Training: Develop/update and implement first responder training Id entify communities in which fumigants are used which do not already have information or training on appropriate response to soil fumigant incidents, and develop and incorporate training for first responders into ex isting programs ; Update first responder training periodicall y. In formation on first responder training can be found at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/soil

fum

- communities.html

**Table 4 :**  **State Activities Burden**  **Description** Notice to States State L ead Agencies (SLAs) have the option to receive notice prior to

fumigant applications. As discussed in table 2, information on notification to SLAs can be found at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/statenotices/

**5. THE INF**  **ORMATION COLLECTED**

**– AGENCY ACTIVITIES, COLLECTION**  **METHODOLOGY, AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 5(a).**  **Agency Activities** This I CR primaril y involves activities conducted for the purpose of submi tting or providing information to third parties. EPA , however, does receive and review training and safety information materials developed or updated by registrant task forces prior to their distribution to third parties. EPA implements the soil fumigant mitigation measures as part of the reregistration pro gram
. **Table 5: Agency Activities** 

**Burden Description**  EPA Review, Coordination, and Implementation Responsibilities EPA has the responsibility to implement the soil fumigant mitigation measures, review and approve materials that are submitted, and coordinate reviews among experienced professionals. **5(b). Collection Methodology and Management**  This I CR primaril y involves activities conducted for the purpose of submitting or providing information to third parties. F or the information that EPA may collect in the future under this IC R (i.e., training and safety information materials) , registrant task forces will submit the materials as needed and EPA will track, review and approve any new or updated materialsMarch 25, 2013

Page **12** of **25** consistent with current Agency processes and pro cedures for the submission of pesticide information to the Agency. **5(c). Small Entity Flexibility**  The reregistration eligibility of the soil fumigants depend upon applicators receiving the various information and training required in the soil fumigant labels. These cannot be reduced for small establishments without seriously compromising the protections offered to applicators and by standers. As such, small entities are required to follow the same requirements as larger establishments. **5(d). Collection Schedule**  This I CR primaril y involves activities conducted for the purpose of submitting or providing information to third parties. For registrant task forces who must submit training and safety information materials to the Agency for review , there is no set collection schedule as registrant task forces submit materials only when developed or updated

. EPA periodically checks the f

umigant risk mitigation measures as a part of the registration review program.
**6. ESTIMATING THE BURDEN AND COST**  **OF THE COLLECTION 6(a)** 
**. Estimating Respondent Burden**  The burden associated with this collection of information is described in detail in the following sections. The respondents include certified applicators, pesticide handler s , fumigant registrants and states. To estimate the respondent burden, the Agency used current information and statistics on the number of fumigant applications made annuall y, the number of certified applicators and pesticide handlers that appl y or handle soil fumigants , and the number of fumigant registrants. Certified applicators and pesticide handlers have paperwork burden associated with fumigant application activities, such as understanding the requirements , posting treatment areas and developing a FMP . It is estimated that the burden associated with the first application will be highest, mostly

due to the time necessary to develop the FMP (12 hours). Each of the other paperwork related activities is estimated to take no more than an hour. Total burden for the first application is estimated to be nearl y 1 5 hours, while each subsequent application is estimated to take less than 4 hours. The Agency estimates that more than 12,000 soil fumigant applications are made in the U

. S

. each year. Requirem ents currently

exist to ensure that certified applicators and agricultural handlers possess general pesticide use and safety information. Applicators must be determined to be competent to become certified, and to maintain their certification they must either receive training or be recertified by exam on a schedule determined by the state (Certification of Pesticide Applicators, 40 CFR 171). That schedule ranges, depending on the state, from 1 to 5 ye ars. Under the agricultural Worker Protection Standard (40 CFR 170), agricultural handlers are required to receive general pesticide safety training at least once every 5 years. BurdensMarch 25, 2013

Page **13** of **25** from those requirements are included in currently

- approved ICRs for those two rules (Certification of Pesticide Applicators (OMB Control No. 2070

- 0029) and Worker Protection Standard Training and Notification (OMB Control No. 2070

- 0148)) , and are not included here. The soil fumigant label revisions establish training requirements specific to soil fumigation for certified applicators and handlers on the safe and appropriate use of these products. Soil fumigant applicators are required to receive this fumigant

- specific training every 3 ye ars; handlers involved in soil fumigant application must be provided with the specific safe handling information annually . Burdens from these fumigant

- specific requirements are included in this I CR and are separate and distinct from th e requirements cited above under the Certification of Pesticide Applicators ICR ( OMB Control No. 2070

- 0029) and the agricultural Worker Protection Standard ICR ( OMB Control No. 2070

- 0148) . There are an estimated 4,458 certified applicators applying soil fumigants and 13,374 pesticide handlers of soil fumigants subject to these training requirements. Registrant burden is associated with the development and dissemination of fumigant application, handler safety and first responder training materials. They must also develop and implement a community

outreach program. The majority of the burden associated with these activities is in the one

- time development of the materials. An estimated 320 hours will be spent by each registrant developing the fumigant training materials; 120 hours will be spent developing the handler safety materials; and 240 hours will be spent developing the first responder training and developing the community outreach program. The annual dissemination of fumigant training and handler safety materials is estimated to take 22 hours per registrant for each activity , while the implementation of the community outreach program is estimated to take 120 hours per registrant annuall y, and the dissemination of first responder training is estimat ed to take 120 hours per registrant annually . There are six task forces that will be developing and disseminating the required materials. States are responsible for enforcement and compliance of the fumigant application

related requirements. It is estim ated that states will spend an average of 15 minutes per application on enforcement and compliance activities. Given the more than 12,000 fumigant applications made per ye ar, state activities amount to more than 3,000 hours per year. The detailed burden estimates and calculations are presented below for each respondent group, along with costs. The burden for certified applicators and pesticide handlers is shown in Tables 6, 7, 8, and 9; burden for registrants of soil fumigant products in Tables 10 and 11 ; and burden for states in Tables 12 and 13. **6(b)**
**. Methodology for**  **Estimating Respondent Cost** Respondent cost is based on the burden as described above and summarized below , and wages, benefits and overhead for all labor categories for affected industries, state government, and EPA employees. This approach uses a transparent and cons istent methodology and current publicly

- available data to provide more accurate estimates and allow eas y replication of the estimates of wages, benefits and overhead

.March 25, 2013

Page **14** of **25** Methodology: The methodology uses data on each sector and labor ty pe for an u nloaded wage rate (hourl y wage rate), and calculates the loaded wage rate (unloaded wage rate + benefits), and the f

ully loaded wage rate (loaded wage rate + overhead). Costs are indexed to 2010 dollars. Wage Rates : Wages are estimated for occupations (management, t echnical, and clerical) within applicable sectors. The Agency uses average unloaded wage data for the relevant sectors available in the National Industry- Specific Occupational Employ ment and Wage Estimates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) at http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm

. For loaded wage rates, benefits represent 44% of unlo aded wage rates, based on benefits for all civilian non

farm workers, from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t01.htm

. Fully loaded wage rates include an additional 50% on top of the loaded wage rate to capture overhead costs ( EPA guidelines 20

- 70%)

. The data and calculations for wage rates used in this document are presented in Attachment E

. Sectors: The specific North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code and website for each sector is included in that sector’s wage rate table. Within each sector, the wage data are provided by

Standard Occupational Classification (SOC). The SOC sy stem is used by Federal statistical agencies to classify workers into occupational categories f or the purpose of collecting, calculating, or disseminating data (see http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm ). There are three categories of respondents: certified applicators and handl ers, registrants and states. The cost associated with each is described in this section. (1) Certified Applicators and Pesticide Handlers The estimated costs of paperwork activities for certified applicators and pesticide handlers are shown in Tables 6, 7, 8, and 9 , along with burden . Tables 6 and 7 list the estimated costs associated with paperwork for user application activities, while Tables 8 and 9 list the costs associated with training activities. Wage rates are based on NAICS code 111000

- Agriculture, Fishing, Forestry

and Hunting. They

are loaded to account for some benefits paid by the employer , but do not account for overhead . The loaded wage rate for certified applicators ($33.24) is based on the scientist/technician labor category , while the pesticide handler wage is based on an average of the loaded wage rate for the scientist/technician and agriculture worker labor categories (($33.2 4 +$13. 40 )/2 = $23.32) , reflecting a higher skilled worker (see Attachment E)

.(1a) User Application Activi ties Table 6 summarizes the burden and cost for paperwork activities per soil fumigant application for certified applicators and pesticide handlers. Table 7 summarizes the burden and cost per ye ar. The annual burden and cost is based on the number of app lications made per year. EPA estimates that more than 12,000 applications are made per ye ar b y certified applicators and pesticide handlers based on historical pesticide usage data for the soil fumigants. In addition to the hourly

burden and cost of co mpliance with the application requirements, applicators are required to purchase signs for the posting requirement and tubesMarch 25, 2013

Page **15** of **25** and pumps for the air monitoring requirement. The sign cost is $0.09 per sheet 3 and assuming 4 sheets per application (posting at 2 points of entry to the treated field and 2 postings along routes of approach to the treated field on average), the cost per application is $0.36. The total annual material cost for posting, assuming 12,651 applications per year , is $4,554. With 37,953 applications over 3 ye ars, the total estimated 3 year cost is $13,663. Monitoring devices must be used during methyl bromide applications and if sensory irritation occurs while applying other fumigants. Each application requires a pump to be on

- site, and a new tube is necessary for every measurement. The cost of a Draeger tube for monitoring the air at an application site is $16 on average 4 and the cost of a Draeger pump is $405 5

. Assuming one tube per application, the total annual cost of the tubes is $202,416 ($16 per tube per application multiplied by 12,651 applications)

. O ver 3 ye ars , the total cost of the tubes is $607,248. Assuming each certified applicator (there are an estimated 4,458 certified applicators) purchases one new pump every 3 ye ars, the total 3 year cost for the pumps is $1,805,490 , for an average of $601,830 per year
. Burden for this measurement is included in the FMP estimates since the labels require measurements to be recorded in the PAS

. The material cost of compliance is equal to the cost of purchasing the signs for posting plus the cost of the tubes and pumps for air monitoring . The total 3 year cost is $2,426,401 , for an average annual cost of $808,800

.

3 Source: Staples, 2008 4 Draeger tubes are sold in packages of 10 for as much as $160 per package. Source: AFC International, Inc., 2012. 5 Source: AFC International, Inc., 2012.March 25, 2013

Page **16** of **25 Table**  **6 . Certified Applicator and Pesticide Handler Burden and**  **Cost for User Application Activities per Application**  **, By Activity Category**  **Activity Frequency**  **Certified Applicator**  **Hours Cost**  **( @**  **$3 3** 
**. 2**  **4 /hr)**  **1 Pesticide** 

**Handler Hours**  **Cost (**  **@ $2**  **3**
**. 3**  **2 /hr)**  **1 Total** 

**Hours Cost** **2**

Understanding requirements Learn/refresh

understanding of fumigant requirements Annual 0.50 $16.62 0

$0 0.50

$16.62
Posting Fill in

In formation Per

Application 0.13

$4.32 0

$0 0.13

$4.32 Post/Remove Signs Per

Application 0

$0 1.0

$23.32 1.0

$23.32 Notice to SLA Prepare

information in Notice Per

Application 0.17

$5.65 0

$0 0.17

$5.65
Send Notice Per

Application 0.05

$1.66 0

$0 0.05

$1.66 Fumigant Management Plan Prepare Initial

Plan Per Initial

Application 12.00

$398.88 0

$0 12.00

$398.88 Prepare Subsequent Plan Per

Subsequent Application 1.00

$33.24 0

$0 1.00

$33.24
Create Post Fumigation Report Per

Application 1.00

$33.24 0

$0 1.00

$33.24
File and Disclose Plan Per

Application 0.05

$1.66 0

$0 0.05

$1.66 **Total Burden and Cost Per**  **Initial and Subsequent Application**  **3** Initial Application 13.90

$462.04 1.0

$23.32 14.90

$485.36 Subsequent Application 2.90

$96.40 1.0

$23.32 3.90

$119.72 Numbers may not add due to rounding. 1

- Cost is equal to the hours times the wage rate ($/hr). 2

- Total hours and cost are the sum of certified applicator and pesticide handler hours and cost. 3

– Initial Application is equal to the sum of each activity less prepare subsequent plan. Subsequent application hours and cost is equal to the sum of each activity less prepare initial application.March 25, 2013

Page **17** of **25 Table**  **7 . Total Annual Certified Applicator and Pesticide Handler Burden and Cost for**  **User Application Activities Year**  **Certified Applicator**

**Hours Cost**  **1 Pesticide Handler** 

**Hours Cost**  **1 Total** 

**Hours Cost** **2** Year 1 175,849 $5,845,217 12,651

$295,021 188,500

$6,140,239 Year 2 175,849 $5,845,217 12,651

$295,021 188,500

$6,140,239 Year 3 106,268 $3,532,362 12,651

$295,021 118,919

$3,827,383 3 Year Annual Average 152,655 $5,074,265 12,651

$295,021 165,306

$5,369,287 3 Year Total 457,966

$15,222,796 37,953

$885,064 495,919

$16,107,860 Numbers may not add due to rounding. 1

- Cost is equal to the total hours and cost for the initial and subsequent application as listed in rows 11 and 12 of Table 6 multiplied times the number of application s
. EPA assumes that fumigations occur once every two years, and that 100% of fumigations in year 1 and 2 are first time fumigation, and 50% of fumigations are first time fumigations starting in year 3. The estimated number of applications per year is as f ollows: Initial Applications Subsequent Applications Year 1 12,651 0 Year 2 12,651 0 Year 3 6,326 6,326 3 Year Average 10,543 2,109 3 Year Total 31,628 6,326 For Example: For certified applicators in Year 3 the hours are equal to foll owing: Certified applicator: (13.90 hours/application x 6,326 applications) + (2.90 hours/application x 6,326 applications) 2

- Total hours and cost are the sum of certified applicator and pesticide handler hours and cost.

(1b) Training Activities Table 8 summarizes the burden and cost for certified applicators and pesticide handlers for training activities per trainee , while Table 9 summarizes the burden and cost per year of training activities. The annual burden and cost is based on the number of certified applicators and pesticide handlers involved with soil fumigant applications . EPA estimates that there are 4,458 applicable certified applicators and 13 ,374 handlers. This is based on data submitted to EPA on the number of certified applicators and the assumption of three pesticide handlers per certified applicator.March 25, 2013

Page **18** of **25 Table**  **8 . Certified Applicator and Pesticide Handler Burden and Cost for Training**  **Activities per Applicator , By Activity**  **Category Activity**  **Frequency Certified**  **Applicator Hours**  **and Cost**  **( @**  **$3 3** 
**. 2**  **4 /hr)**  **1 Pesticide** 

**Handler Hours and**  **Cost (**  **@ $2**  **3**
**. 3**  **2 /hr)**  **1 Total** 

**Hours and Cost** **2**

Applicator Fumigant Training Mandatory

Training Once Every

3 Years 8.00

$265.92 0

$0 8.00

$265.92 Retain Training Documentation Once Every

3 Years 0.05

$1.66 0

$0 0.05

$1.66 Handler Safety In formation Fumigant

Specific Safety In formation Annual 3 0.08 $2.66 1.00

$23.3 2 1.08

$25.9 8

Numbers may not add due to rounding. 1

- Cost is equal to the hours times the wage rate ($/hr). 2

- Total hours and cost are the sum of certified applicator and pesticide handler hours and cost. 3

– Information is disseminated to pesticide handlers on a per application basis. Estimates presented here are the total estimated annual burden of all applications conducted by a certified applicator or pesticide handler in a given year
. **Table 9**  **. Total Annual Certified Applicator and Pesticide Handler Burden and Cost for Training Activities**  **Year Certified Applicator**  **Hours and Cost**  **1 Pesticide Handler**  **Hours and Cost**  **1 Total** 

**Hours and Cost** **2** Year 1 36,244 $1,204, 735 13,374 $311, 882 49,618

$1,516, 617 Year 2 357 $11,85 5 13,374 $311, 882 13,731

$323, 736 Year 3 357 $11,85 5 13,374 $311, 882 13,731

$323, 736 3 Year Annual Average 12,319 $409, 482 13,374 $311, 882 25,693

$721, 363 3 Year Total 36,957 $1,228, 445 40,122 $935, 645 77,079

$2,16 4,090 Numbers may not add due to rounding. 1

- Cost is equal to the total hours and costs as listed Table 8 times the number of certified applicators and pesticide handlers that apply or handle soil fumigants . EPA estimates an applicable 4,458 certified applicators and 13,374 pesticide handlers. For Example: For certified applicators in Year 1 the hours are equal to following: Certified applicator: (8.00 hours/applicator + 0.05 hours/applicators + 0.08 hours/applicator) x (4,458 applicators ) 2

- Total hours and cost are the sum of certified applicator and pesticide handler hours and cost. (2) Registrants of Soil Fumigant Products The estimated paperwo rk costs for soil fumigant registrants are shown in Tables 10 and 11

. Wage rates are for NAI CS 325300

- Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing and are fully loaded to account for benefits and overhead. EPA estimates thatMarch 25, 2013

Page **19** of **25** there are 6 registrant task forces that will develop and distribute the required materials based on correspondence with these task forces

. Table 10 shows the estimates of burden and cost per registrant task force to develop and distribute training materials; prepare and distribute safety information; design and implement community outreach; and develop and distribute first responder training materials. Table 11 shows the annual cost across all registrants of the activities taking into account the frequency o f the activity

. **Table 10** 
**. Soil Fumigant**  **Registrant Burden and Cost , By Activity**  **Category Activities**  **Frequency Management**  **Hours and Cost**  **( @$120.2**  **8/ hr)**  **1 Technical** 

**Hours and**  **Cost (**  **@$60.85 /**  **hr) 1**  **Clerical**

**Hours and**  **Cost (**  **@$37.11 /**  **hr) 1**  **Total**

**Hours and**  **Cost 2** 

Fumigant Training Develop/Update

Training Materials One Time 80.00 $9,622.40 160.00

$9 , 7 36.00 80.00

$2,968.8 0 320.00

$22,327
Maintain / Distribute Training Materials Annually 0 $0 10

$ 6 0 8.50 12.00

$445.32 2 2.00

$1,054

Handler Safety In formation Prepare/Update

In formation One Time 40.00 $4,811.20 40.00

$2,434.0 0 40.00

$1,484.40 120.00

$8,730 Distribute Training Materials Annually 0 $0 0

$0 12.00

$445.32 12.00

$44 5 Community Outreach Program Design/Update

Program One Time 80.00 $9,622.40 80.00

$4,868. 0 0 80.00

$2,968.8 0 240.00

$17,459 Implement Program in High Use Areas Annually 40.00 $4,811.20 40.00

$2,434.0 0 40.00

$1,484.40 120.00

$8,730

First Responder Training Develop/Update

Training Materials One Time 80.00 $9,622.40 80.00

$4,868. 0 0 80.00

$2,968.8 0 240.00

$ 17,459
Distribute Material in High Use Areas Annually 0 $0 0

$0 120.00

$4,453.2 0 120.00

$4,453

Numbers may not add due to rounding. 1

- Cost is equal to the hours times the wage rate ($/hr). 2

- Total hours and cost are the sum of managerial, technical and clerical hours and cost.March 25, 2013

Page **20** of **25 Table**  **11 . Total Annual Registrant Burden and Cost**  **Year Managerial** 

**Hours and Cost**  **1 Technical** 

**Hours and Cost**  **1 Clerical** 

**Hours and Cost**  **1 Total** 

**Hours and Cost** **2** Year 1 1,920

$230 , 938 2,4 6 0

$149,691 2,784

$ 103,314 7,1 6 4

$483,943 Year 2 240

$28,867 30 0

$18,255 1,104

$40,969 1, 64 4

$88,092 Year 3 240

$28,867 30 0

$18,255 1,104

$40,969 1, 64 4

$88,092 3 Year Annual Average 800

$96,224 1, 0 20

$62,067 1,664

$61,751 3,4 8 4

$220,042 3 Year Total 2,400

$288,672 3,060

$186,201,201 4,992

$18 5,253 10, 45 2

$660,126 Numbers may not add due to rounding. 1

- Cost is equal to the total hours and cost in Table 10 multiplied times the estimated number of registrant task force s ( 6 ) . For Example: The Year 1 number of managerial hours is equal to the hours per registrant for each of the activities times 6 : (80 hours/registrant+0 hours/registrant+40 hours/registrant+0 hours/registrant+80 hours/registrant+40 hours/registrant+80 hours/registrant+0 hours/registrant) x ( 6 registrants) 2

- Total hours and cost are the sum of managerial, technical and clerical hours and cost. (3) States The burden for states per application for compliance and enforcement activities is shown in Table 12

. Wage rates are for NAICS 999200

– State Government and are fully loaded to account for benefits and overhead. EPA’s requirements are for only those states with high fumigant use, and currently , EPA estimates that there are 15 states that account for the majority of fumigant use and are considered high use : California, Washington, Idaho, Oregon, Wisconsin, Michigan, Florida, Minnesota, North Carolina, Virginia, Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, Colorado, and North Dakota . This is based on an EPA anal ysis of fumigant pesticide usage and U

. S

. crop acreage grown which showed that a majority of soil fumigant usage occurred in 15 states. 6 Costs are measured on a per application basis. Annual burden , assuming more than 12,000 fumigant applications per year , is shown in Table 13 . The Agency estimates that all of the paperwork burden for responding to this I CR will be conducted b y clerical (or administrative) staff.

6 The EP A document can be found at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2005

- 0125

- 0516

.March 25, 2013

Page **21** of **25 Table**  **12 . State Burden and Cost**  **per Application Category**  **Activities Frequency**  **Clerical Hours and**  **Cost (**  **@$39.20 /hr)**  **1 Total** 

**Hours and Cost** **2**
State Compliance and Enforcement Paperwork for

Compliance and Enforcement Annual ly 0.25 $9.80 0.25

$ 9. 80 Numbers may not add due to rounding. State management and technical staff are not estimated to be impacted by this ICR. 1

- Cost is equal to the hours times the wage rate ($/hr). 2

- Total hours and cost are the sum of managerial, technical and clerical hours and cost. Since only clerical staff is im pacted, the total hours and cost are equal to the clerical hours and cost. **Table 13** 
**. Total Annual**  **State Burden and Cost Year**  **Clerical Hours and Cost**  **1 Total**  **Hours and Cost 2**  Year 1 3,163 $123,980 3,163 $123,980 Year 2 3,163 $123,980 3,163 $123,980 Year 3 3,163 $123,980 3,163 $123,980 3 Year Annual Average 3,163 $123,980 3,163 $123,980 3 Year Total 9,488 $371,939 9,488 $ 371,939 Numbers may not add due to rounding. State management and technical staff are not estimated to be impacted by this ICR. 1

- Cost is equal to the total hours and cost per application as listed in Table 7 mu ltiplied times the number of applications

. EPA assumes that fumigations occur once every two years, and that 100% of fumigations in year 1 and 2 are first time fumigation, and 50% of fumigations are first time fumigations starting in year 3. The estimated number of applications per year as follows: Initial Applications Subsequent Applications Year 1 12,651 0 Year 2 12,651 0 Year 3 6,326 6,326 3 Year Average 10,543 2,109 3 Year Total 31,628 6,326 For Example: For states in Ye ar 1 , the hours are equal to the following: (0.25 hours/application x 12,651 applications) 2

- Total hours and cost are the sum of managerial, technical and clerical hours and cost. Since only clerical staff is im pacted, the total hours and cost are equal to the clerical hours and cost. **6(c)**
**. Estimating Agency Burden and Cost**  Agency burden is shown in Tables 14 and 15

. To determine Agency costs, the Agency used the Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates of labor rates for the North American Industry Classification System code for the Federal Ex ecutive Branch (NAICS 999100). Wage rates areMarch 25, 2013

Page **22** of **25** fully loaded to account for benefits and overhead. Table 14 shows the burden and cost per activity for the Agency , while Table 15 is the annual burden and cost across all activities. Agency costs are based on managerial and technical hours spent on compliance and enforcement activities.
**Table 14**  **. Agency Burden and Cost Category**  **Activities Frequency**  **Management Hours and**  **Cost (@$119.**  **8 5**  **/hr) 1**  **Technical**

**Hours and Cost**  **(@$71.58 /hr)**  **1 Total** 

**Hours and Cost** **2** Federal Compliance and Enforcement Review

Registrant Training Materials One Time 80.00 $9,588.00 1,092.00

$78,165.36 1,172

$87,753
Develop User Tools and Templates One Time 40.00 $4,794.00 1,092.00

$78,165.36 1,132

$82,959
Review Labels and Materials One Time 40.00 $4,794.00 2,184.00

$156,330.72 2,224

$161,125 Compliance Training and Stakeholder Engagement Annually 104.00 $12,464.40 1,092.00

$78,165.36 1,196

$90,630

Numbers may not add due to rounding. Agency clerical staff are not impacted by this ICR. 1

- Cost is equal to the hours times the wage rate ($/hr). 2

- Total hours and cost are the sum of managerial, technical hours and cost. **Table 15**  **. Total Annual Age ncy Burden and Cost**  **Year Managerial** 

**Hours/Cost 1**  **Technical**

**Hours/Cost 1**  **Total**

**Hours/Cost 2**  Year 1 264 $31,640 5,460

$390,827 5,724

$422,467 Year 2 104 $12,464 1,092

$78,165 1,196

$90,630 Year 3 104 $12,464 1,092

$78,165 1,196

$90,630 3 Year Annual Average 157 $18,856 2,548

$182,386 2,705

$201,242 3 Year Total 472

$56,569 7,644

$547,158 8,116

$603,727 Numbers may not add due to rounding. 1

- Cost is equal to the total hours and cost across activities based on frequency from Table 14

. For e xample: The Year 1 number of managerial hours is equal to the sum of the hours for each activity : 80 hours + 40 hours + 40 hours + 104 hours. Years 2 and 3 only include the activities incurred annually (104 hours ). 2

- Total hours and cost are the sum of managerial and technical hours and cost.March 25, 2013

Page **23** of **25 6(d)** 
**. Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost**  Tables 16 and 17 summarize the total annual respondent and Agency burden, respectivel y. In cluding the cost to applicators for the materials required for compliance with the posting and air monitoring requirements ($2,426,401), the total 3 year respondent cost is $21,730,417. **Table 16. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost Information Collection**  **Respondent No. of**  **Responses Burden** 

**Hours Costs**  Fumigant User Application Activities (Table 7) Certified Applicators 12,651 152,655 $5, 883 , 065 1
Pesticide Handlers 12,651 12,651 $295,021 Fumigant Training Activities (Table 9) Certified Applicators 4,458 12,319 $409,482
Pesticide Handlers 13,374 13,374 $311,882 Development and Distribution of Training & In formational Materials (Table 11) Registrants 6 3, 484 $220,042

Paperwork for Compliance and Enforcement in High Use States (Table 13) State Agencies 12,651 3,163 $123,980

**Total Annual Average**  55,791 197,646 $ 7,243 , 472 1

- Costs for certified applicators include the capital costs of $808,800 for purchasing buffer zone signs and air monitoring equipment (pumps and tubes). See section 6(b)(1a) and Table 7.
**Table 1 7**  **. Annual Agency Burden and Cost**  **Year Total**  **Hours 1**  **Total Cost**  **1** Year 1 5,724 $422,467 Year 2 1,196 $90,630 Year 3 1,196 $90,630 **3 Year Annual Average** 2,705 $201,242 **3 Year Total** 8,116 $603,727 1

– Total hours and cost are a sum of total hours and cost for the Agency . See Table 15

. **6(e)**
**. Reasons for Change in Burden**  This is a new ICR. **6(f)**
**. Burden Statement**  The total estimated annual respondent paperwork burden to comply with this information collection activity

is 197,646 hours. This estimate includes the time needed for certifiedMarch 25, 2013

Page **24** of **25** applicators (164,974 hours) , pesticide handlers (26,025 hours) , registrants ( 3,484 hours), and states (3,163 hours) to conduct fumigant application related paperwork activities (see s ection 6(b ) and 6 (d) ). For certified applicators, the burden for this collection is estimated to be 2.9 to 13.9 hours per soil fumigant applicatio n , and 0.08 to 8.13 hours per certified applicator per year for training . For pesticide handlers, the burden for this collection is estimated to average 1 hour per soil fumigant application , and 1 hour per pesticide handler per year for safety training. Th e burden for registrant task forces to develop, distribute , and implement fumigant training and informational materials is estimated to be 274 to 1,194 hours per task force per year . For states, the burden for this collection is estimated to average 0.25 hours per application. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the **Federal Register**  , are listed in 40 CFR Part 9, and included on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this I CR under docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2011

- 1036, which is available for public viewing at the OPP Docket in the EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Rm. 3334, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington , DC 20460

- 0001 . This docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The OPP Docket telephone number is (703) 305

- 5 805

. An electronic version of the public docket is available through Federal eRulemaking Portal, http://www.regulations.gov

. Follow the online instructions for viewing documents and submitting comments. You can also send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Office for EPA. Please include the docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2011

- 1036 and OMB control numbe r 2070

-NEW in any correspondence.March 25, 2013

Page **25** of **25 A** **ttachments to the Supporting Statement** Attachments to the supporting statement are available in the public docket established for this ICR under docket identification number EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 20 11

- 1036 . These attachments are available for online viewing at www.regulations.gov or otherwise accessed as described in section 6(f) of the supporting statement. Attachment A: 7 U.S.C. 136 a - F IFRA s ection 3(c)(2)( B )

. This is also available online at

the House of Representatives’ **US Code Website**

Attachment B: 7 U.S.C. 136 a - FIFRA Section 3(c)(5)

. This is also available online at the

House of Representatives’ **US Code Website**

Attachment C : Docket Numbers for Fumigant Reregistration Eligibility Decisions and Supporting Documents Attachment D: Record of Consultations Between the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency and Respondents to the Information Collection Request: “Soil Fumigant Risk Mitigation” Attachment E: Worksheet for Estimating OPP I CR Wage Rates for Industry , State and

EPA L abor Costs