alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I. Date: March 11, 2009 

II. Subject: Meeting with Industry Representatives and U.S. EPA, Sector Policies and 

Program Division, Metals and Minerals Group 

III. Location: EPA Campus, RTP, North Carolina 

IV. Attendees: 

EPA

Steve Fruh, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD 

 Chuck French, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD 

 Gold Mine Industry Representatives

 Denise Kennedy, Holland and Hart 

 Joe Beetler, Newmont Mining Corporation 

 Greg Schoen, Round Mountain Gold Corporation 

 Mike Tomko, Parsons Behle & Latimer 

 Steve Barringer, Holland and Hart 

 Andy Cole, Barrick Goldstrike Mines Inc. 

 Melissa Barbanell, Barrick Senior Counsel, Regulatory Policy 

 Kevin Lewis, Air Sciences Inc. 

 RTI International

 Marvin Branscome 

 Gabrielle Raymond 

V. Discussion Items: 

• A copy of the major discussion items is included in the attached agenda. 

• EPA described the process for developing MACT floors and MACT and briefly 

described the general status of the proposal development. EPA said they expected to 

complete the initial data analysis and development of preliminary draft MACT floors by 

the end of April. 

• Industry representatives described the thermal processes used at gold mines, including 

the ore pretreatment processes (roasters and autoclaves) used to pretreat refractory ore 

and carbon processes used to remove and recover gold (carbon kilns, electrowinning, 

retorts, and melt furnaces). They also described a few facilities that did not use carbon 

and, consequently, only had two thermal units: retorts and melt furnaces. 

• Mercury test data were discussed. Data are available for 2007 and 2008 for all of the 

thermal units from stack testing required by the Nevada Division of Environmental 

Protection. EPA is in the process of obtaining all of the test data and performing 

preliminary analyses. 
AGENDA (3/11/2009) 

Mercury Emissions from Gold Mine Ore Processing Facilities 

Meeting with Industry Representatives and U.S. EPA, Sector Policies and Program Division, 

Metals and Minerals Group 

Date and Time: March 11, 2009 from 1:00 pm to 4:00 pm (Eastern Time) 

Location: EPA Campus, Room D201, RTP, North Carolina 

Agenda 

Time Topic Presenter 

1:00 to 1:10 Welcome and Introductions All 

1:10 to 1:20 General Status of the 

Development of a Draft 

Proposed MACT Rule 

EPA Representative 

1:20 to 2:05 Presentation by Industry, 

including: descriptions of 

processes; available data; 

possible groupings of 

processes; and other related 

topics 

Representative from 

Industry 

2:05 to 2:20 Open Discussion, Qs & As All 

2:20 to 2:30 Coffee Break 

2:30 to 2:45 Summary of Emissions 

Data and Emissions Factors 

EPA Representative 

2:45 to 3:45 Other Issues, Open 

Discussion, Qs and As 

All
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6154

HUNG YEE, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

J.D. WHITEHEAD, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. 

(1:08-cv-01550-CCB) 

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009 

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Hung Yee, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Hung Yee, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the 

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

(2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will 

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Yee has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate 

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.77 MB)

Tags:Elks, Loglines, Defense Supply Center Richmond, November 2018

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.34 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, Loglines, RPPOB, March 2019, Replensihment Parts Purchase or Borrow Program

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.17 MB)

Tags:resolutions, new years

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
# Capacitor Sta rt Resilient Base Motors

1 1 www.aosmithmotors.com 

## Features

• Class “B” Insulation • Reversible • 2 and 4 Pole • High Start Torque • Sleeve & Ball • 40° C Ambient • Open Construction Bearing • 60 HZ

F.L. Stock Pro- A p p r o x . Dim. En- Conn. HP RPM Volts Amps S.F. Frame Number Alternate Bearings tector “C” “AG” clos. Dia. Notes 3⁄4 3450 115/208-230 8.8/4.4 1.25 48 RBF1072ABF1072 Ball Auto 10.4 8.5 Open 38 9

115/208-230 10.0/5.0 1.5 48 BF1072 Ball Auto 11.1 9.2 Open 22 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 115/208-230 10.0/5.0 1.5 56 BK1072 Ball Auto 11.6 9.4 Open 22 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 115/230 11.2/5.6 1.25 56 RB1072A B588 Ball Auto 11.3 9.1 Open 38 1725 115/208-230 12.0/6.0 1.25 56 BK1074 C426 Ball Auto 12.7 10.7 Open 22 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 115/208-230 11.6/5.8 1.25 56 RB1074A Ball Auto 11.3 9.1 Open 38 115/230 13/6.5 1.00 56 RS1070A Sleeve Auto 11.3 9.1 Open 38 115/230 10.4/5.20 1.25 56 RS1074 C666 Sleeve None 11.8 9.6 Open 101 115/230 10.4/5.20 1.25 56 RS1074A Sleeve Auto 11.8 9.6 Open 38 115/230 10.4/5.20 1.25 56 RB1074 C666 Ball None 11.8 9.6 Open 101 1 3450 115/208-230 12.6/6.3 1.4 48 BF1102 Ball Auto 11.6 9.7 Open 22 5,6,7,8

115/208-230 12.6/6.3 1.4 56 BK1102 Ball Auto 11.9 9.7 Open 22 5,6,7,8 115/230 11/5.5 1.25 48 RBF1102A Ball Auto 10.9 9.0 Open 38 9 115/230 12.2/6.1 1.25 56 RS1102A B701 Sleeve Auto 11.8 9.6 Open 38 9 115/230 12.2/6.1 1.25 56H RB1102A B589 Ball Auto 11.4 9.2 Open 38 9 115/230 12.2/6.1 1.25 56H RB1102 B703 Ball None 11.4 9.2 Open 101 9 1725 115/208-230 14/7.0 1.25 56 BK1104 RB1104A Ball Auto 13.7 11.5 Open 22 5,6,7,8,9

115/230 14.2/7.1 1.25 56H RS1104A Sleeve Auto 11.8 9.6 Open 38 115/230 14.2/7.1 1.15 56 RB1104 C524 Ball None 11.8 9.6 Open 101 9 115/230 14.2/7.1 1.25 56 RB1104A Ball Auto 11.4 9.2 Open 38 1-1⁄2 3450 115/208-230 17.2/8.6 1.3 56H BK1152 Ball Auto 13.7 11.5 Open 22 5,6,7,8

115/230 16.4/8.2 1.2 56 RB1152A B722 Ball Auto 11.8 9.6 Open 38 9 1725 115/208-230 16.4/8.2 1.2 56H RB1154A Ball Auto 12.8 10.6 Open 38 115/208-230 19.0/9.5 1.15 56H BK1154 RB1154A Ball Auto 14.7 12.5 Open 22 5,6,7,8,9 2 3450 115/208-230 24.6/12.3 1.2 56 RB1202A Ball Auto 12.8 10.6 Open 38 9

115/208-230 21.2/10.6 1.2 56H BK1202 Ball Auto 14.2 12.0 Open 22 5,6,7,8 1725 115/208-230 24.6/12.3 1.15 56 RB1204A Ball Auto 12.8 10.6 Open 38 115/208-230 25/12.5 1.15 56H BK1204 RB1204A Ball Auto 15.3 13.1 Open 22 5,6,7,8,9

Notes: 5. Sealed switch design 6. Start capacitor inside 7. Terminal board 8. Moderate start torque 9. Item to be discontinued when stock is depleted See page 117 for mounting dimensions.



### Shaft Dimensions 48 = 1/2” Flat x 1-5/8” 56 = 5/8” Keyed x 1-7/8” 56H = 5/8” Keyed x 1-7/8” Continued from previous page

BK1204 RB1104A 

### Features:Class “B” Insulation • High Start T orque • Open Construction • Reversible • Sleeve & Ball Bearing
• 2 and 4 Pole • 40° C Ambient • 60 HZ
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 58 

Authorizing the reporting of committee funding resolutions for the period 

March 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2013 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. ROBERTS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the reporting of committee funding resolutions 

for the period March 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013. 

1 Resolved, That notwithstanding paragraph 9 of rule 

2 XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate— 

3 (1) not later than February 26, 2013, each 

4 committee shall report 1 resolution authorizing the 

5 committee to make expenditures out of the contin6 gent fund of the Senate to defray its expenses, in7 cluding the compensation of members of its staff, for 

8 the period March 1, 2013 through September 30, 

9 2013; and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 58 ATS 

1 (2) the Committee on Rules and Administration 

2 may report 1 authorization resolution containing 

3 more than 1 committee authorization resolution for 

4 the period March 1, 2013 through September 30, 

5 2013. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 2012)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 11375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4600]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 77 , No. 37 / Friday, February 24, 2012 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 11375]]


                Memorandum of February 3, 2012

                
Delegation of Authority Pursuant to Sections 
                110(d)(4) and 110(f) of the Trafficking Victims 
                Protection Act of 2000, as Amended

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 301 of title 3, United 
                States Code, I hereby delegate to you the authority 
                conferred upon the President by the Trafficking Victims 
                Protection Act of 2000 (Division A of Public Law 106-
                386), as amended (the ``Act''), to determine, 
                consistent with sections 110(d)(4) and 110(f) of the 
                Act, with respect to Burma for fiscal year 2012, that 
                assistance described in section 110(d)(1)(B) of the Act 
                would promote the purposes of the Act or is otherwise 
                in the national interest of the United States.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, February 3, 2012

[FR Doc. 2012-4600
Filed 2-23-12; 11:15 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
Exhibit 99.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT VALUATION FIRM

We hereby consent to the reference
to our name, the description of our role and the valuation of the real properties and related assumptions provided under the heading Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsNet Asset
Value Calculation in Part I, Item 2 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 of Dividend Capital Diversified Property Fund Inc., being incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.
333-162636) of Dividend Capital Diversified Property Fund Inc., and the related prospectus. We also hereby consent to the same information and the reference to our firm under the caption Experts being included in Supplement No. 2 to the
prospectus related to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-175989) of Dividend Capital Diversified Property Fund Inc. In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is
required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.



/s/ Altus Group U.S., Inc.Altus Group U.S., Inc.


August 13, 2012
Exhibit 32.2

NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of NTELOS Holdings Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 (the
Report), I, Michael B. Moneymaker, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Michael B. MoneymakerMichael B. MoneymakerExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary


August 9, 2006
#### The State of Florida *ex rel.*Charles Perry *et al.,*Plaintiffs in Error, v. Board of Pilot Commissioners and Port Wardens of the Port of Pensacola, Defendants in Error.

Writ of error to Circuit Court, Escambia county; Lucius J. Reeves, Judge.

*638John C. Avery for plaintiffs in error.

Blount & Blount for defendants in error.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs in error against the defendants in error. There was judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiffs take writ of error. Writ of error dismissed by the clerk, on praecipe of counsel for the plaintiffs in error, under Rule 24.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in LocalRule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10117

(Summary Calendar)

GEORGE FOSTER,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:95-CV-135-Y)

July 31, 1996

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

George Foster, #520110, appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Foster argues that an unfulfilled state promise and his

former trial counsel’s erroneous advice rendered his guilty plea involuntary. He also contends that
2

he was denied due process and deprived of a liberty interest because his minimum discharge date was

calculated incorrectly. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and AFFIRM the district court’s

denial for essentially the same reasons adopted by the district court. Foster v. Scott, No. 4:95-CV135-Y (N.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 1996).
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 9, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

_______________ 

### m 05-61011

_______________ 

### M ALINDA 

### J OHNSON AND 

### B UBBA 

### J OHNSON 

### , Plaintiffs-Appellants, VERSUS 

### D AVIDSON 

### LADDER 

### , I NC 

### ., ET 

### AL 

### ., Defendants, 

### L OUISVILLE 

### LADDER 

### G ROUP 

### , LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the Northern District of Mississippi



### m 2:03-CV-227

______________________________
Before S MITH , G ARZA , and C LEMENT , Circuit Judges. P ER C URIAM * : We have reviewed th e parties’ bri ef s and pertinent parts of the record, as well as th e applicable l aw. Having done so, we conclude th at th e district court com mit ted no error of law or fact. Therefore, we AFFIRM for essenti ally the reasons stated by the district court in it s com prehensive Memorandum Opinion. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.