alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (4.4 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, DLA, ADA, DDJC

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7084
TYRONE DOUGLAS POWE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-124-3) Submitted: October 15, 1996 Decided: October 30, 1996 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Douglas Powe, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's * order denying relief on his habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Powe v. Angelone , No. CA-96-124-3 (E.D. Va. June 17, 1996). We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.41



ADDENDUM

TO

STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT



The following provisions are hereby incorporated into, and are hereby made a part of, that certain Stock Option Agreement (the Option
Agreement) by and between Borland Software Corporation (the Corporation) and Scott Arnold (Optionee) evidencing the stock option (the Option) granted to Optionee under the terms of the Corporations
2002 Stock Incentive Plan, and such provisions are effective immediately. All capitalized terms in this Addendum, to the extent not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Option Agreement.



SPECIAL ACCELERATION



1. To the extent the Option is assumed in connection with a Change in Control
or otherwise continued in effect or replaced with a substitute option, the Option (or such substitute option) shall not accelerate to any extent upon the occurrence of that Change in Control, and the Option (or such substitute option) shall
accordingly continue, over Optionees period of Service after the Change in Control, to become exercisable for the Option Shares in one or more installments in accordance with the provisions of the Option Agreement. However, upon termination of
Optionees status as an Employee of the Corporation for any reason other than for Misconduct as such term is defined in Optionees offer letter dated October 2, 2003 (the Offer Letter) or upon Optionees Constructive
Termination (as defined in the Offer Letter) within twelve (12) months following such a Change in Control, then one hundred percent (100%) of the unvested shares under such Option (or such substitute option), shall automatically accelerate and such
Option (or substitute option) may be exercised for any or all of those accelerated Option Shares (or other securities) as fully-vested shares, together with any other Option Shares (or other securities) for which the Option has already become vested
and exercisable in accordance with the normal Vesting Schedule.



2. In the event of any conflict, ambiguity, or inconsistency between the provisions of the Option Agreement and the provisions of this Addendum, to the extent possible such provisions will be interpreted so as to resolve any such conflict,
ambiguity, or inconsistency, and if that is not possible, the provisions of the this Addendum will prevail.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borland Software Corporation has caused this Addendum to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the Effective Date
specified below.



BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATIONBy:

/s/    Timothy J. StevensTitle:

Sr. Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary




EFFECTIVE
DATE: November 3, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1954-1955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


2002 Reopened--Previously Denied Determinations; Notice of 
Negative Determinations on Reconsideration Under the Trade Adjustment 
Assistance Extension Act of 2011 Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) (Act) the Department of Labor (Department) herein 
presents summaries of negative determinations on reconsideration 
regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance for 
workers by case (TA-W-) number regarding negative determinations issued 
during the period of February 13, 2011 through October 21, 2011. 
Notices of negative determinations were published in the Federal 
Register and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271). As required by the Trade Adjustment 
Assistance Extension Act of 2011 (TAAEA), all petitions that were 
denied during this time period were automatically reopened. The 
reconsideration investigation revealed that the following workers 
groups have not met the certification criteria under the provisions of 
TAAEA.
    After careful review of the additional facts obtained, the 
following negative determinations on reconsideration have been issued.

TA-W-80,069; Hydro Aluminum North America, Ellenville, NY

[[Page 1955]]

TA-W-80,102; JPMorgan Chase & Co., Fort Worth, TX
TA-W-80,184; Merchants Bank of California, Carson, CA
TA-W-80,222; Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Watervliet, NY
TA-W-80,279; Paris Accessories, Yellville, AR
TA-W-80,305; General Advertising Products, Cincinnati, OH
TA-W-80,385; UBP Asset Management, LLC (``UBPAM''), New York, NY
TA-W-80,404; Golden Living, Fort Smith, AR
TA-W-80,474; Simonton Windows, McAlester, OK
TA-W-80,401; Newlife Academy of Information, East Liverpool, OH

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned negative determinations on 
reconsideration were issued on December 22, 2011 through December 30, 
2011. These determinations are available on the Department's Web site 
at tradeact/taa/taa--search--form.cfm under the searchable listing of 
determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance 
toll-free at (888) 365-6822.

     Dated: January 5, 2012.
 Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-439 Filed 1-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CurrencySharesSMEuro Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Arruda, Chief Financial Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: March 12, 2010

|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|/s/ Joseph Arruda                                                   
|Joseph Arruda* Chief
Financial Officer (principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is
a trust and Joseph Arruda is signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 12, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00795-CV

ASSET RES SERVICES, LLC, Appellant

V.

PARADIGM RECOVERY AND REMARKETING LLC AND SONIA 

RODRIGUEZ, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1140142

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a final judgment signed August 23, 2022. Although 

appellant contends a premature notice of appeal became effective on that date, 

appellant filed an amended notice of appeal on October 24, 2022, after having filed 

a motion requesting reconsideration of that judgment and a new trial on September 

22, 2022.
2

Appellant has not paid the filing fee of $205.00, and no evidence that appellant 

is excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs 

has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. On December 20, 2022, the court ordered 

appellant to pay the filing fee on or before December 30, 2022, and further warned 

appellant that if it did not do so, the appeal was subject to dismissal without further 

notice. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. As of the date of this opinion, appellant has not paid 

the filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) 

(allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant failed to comply with

court order or notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified 

time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6897

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner - Appellee,

versus

CRAIG O. COPLEY,

Respondent - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge; Alexander B. Denson, Magistrate Judge. (CA-90-47-HC-BR)

Submitted: November 15, 1995 Decided: January 29, 1996

Before HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Craig O. Copley, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen Coffey Moore, Fenita

Talore Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order revoking his

conditional release pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 4246(f) (West 1985).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Copley, No. CA90-47-HC-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 1995). Additionally, we find that

Appellant's revocation hearing was not unnecessarily delayed in

violation of § 4246(f). In light of this disposition, we deny

Appellant's Petition to Dismiss Violation of Conditional ReleaseDischarge and his Notice of Motion for an Order. In addition,

Appellant's motion for an expedited appeal is moot and is dismissed

for that reason. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
SERVED: FEBRUARY 1, 2012 

:^:R^.RTMENTOF 

^^::;KhT OFERATiOi'iS 

i^\l PEG - 2 P |: 5 0 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON. DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

K.S. AVIATION, INC., d/b/a Sierra Academy of Aeronautics 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNEDl 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-0483 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On June 13, 2011, the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed a 

Complaint. On June 2, 2011, K.S. Aviation, Inc. d/b/a Sierra Academy of Aeronautics 

("Respondent") had filed a.Rcquesi for Hearing. On January 31. 2012, Complainant filed 

a Motion to Withdraw Complaint, citing settlement of the matter. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, Complainant's Motion to Withdraw Complaint having been read 

and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

Complainant's Motion to Withdraw Complaint be and is hereby granted; 

and 
2. This proceeding he and is hereby dismissed with preiudicc. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachments - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-20 II-0483 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur^Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Cyril L. Lawrence, Respondent '.v Counsel 

Cyril Lawrence, Inc. 

2111 K Street 

Merced, CA 95340 

TEL: 209-383-6854 

FAX: 209-383-6856 

Lierre Green, CompJaina))! 's Coioisel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Reoion, AWP-7.6 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7117 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, 

Adminisirafive Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX. 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Muil For service in person or by expedited courier, use tlic following address: 

Federal Aviation Adininistralion, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W , Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington. DC 20591: Anenlion: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430. 

- 2 -
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 262 

Supporting the goals and ideals of suicide prevention awareness. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 

Mr. DONNELLY (for himself, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. 

CHAMBLISS, Ms. HIRONO, and Mr. TESTER) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of suicide prevention 

awareness. 

Whereas suicide is the tenth leading cause of all deaths in the 

United States and the second leading cause of death 

among individuals between the ages of 10 and 34; 

Whereas, on average, there is a death by suicide in the 

United States every 13.7 minutes; 

Whereas an estimated 6,000,000 individuals in the United 

States are survivors of suicide, meaning they have lost a 

loved one to suicide; 

Whereas suicide is a leading noncombat cause of death 

among members of the Armed Forces; 

Whereas, on average, 22 veterans are lost to suicide in the 

United States each day; 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 262 ATS 

Whereas the Joshua Omvig Veterans Suicide Prevention Act 

(Public Law 110–110; 121 Stat. 1031) was enacted in 

2007 to establish a comprehensive program for suicide 

prevention among veterans; 

Whereas the Veterans Crisis Line, which was established 

under the Joshua Omvig Veteran Suicide Prevention Act, 

has received more than 890,000 telephone calls and facilitated more than 30,000 life-saving rescues; 

Whereas the stigma associated with mental illness and 

suicidality works against suicide prevention by discouraging individuals at risk of suicide from seeking life-saving help and further traumatizes survivors of suicide; 

Whereas 90 percent of the individuals who die by suicide 

have a diagnosable psychiatric disorder at the time of 

death; 

Whereas many suicides are preventable; and 

Whereas September is National Suicide Prevention Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Suicide Prevention Awareness Month; 

4 (2) supports efforts during National Suicide 

5 Prevention Awareness Month to raise awareness and 

6 improve outreach to individuals at risk for suicide, 

7 especially such efforts addressed to veterans and 

8 members of the Armed Forces; and 

9 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

10 to learn more about the warning signs of suicide and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 262 ATS 

1 how each person can help prevent suicide and pro2 mote mental health. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NARJIT SINGH,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 11-72177

Agency No. A070-541-436

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 11, 2014** 

San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FISHER and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Narjit Singh petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his claims for

asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture

(CAT). We deny the petition.

FILED

DEC 15 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 *This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 **The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
The BIA’s adverse credibility determination is supported by substantial

evidence. See Cui v. Holder, 712 F.3d 1332, 1336 (9th Cir. 2013); Zamanov v.

Holder, 649 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2011). Singh testified inconsistently regarding

when he first encountered problems with the police because of his support for

Shiromani Akali Dal Mann, first testifying the problems began in 1990 but later

testifying that they began in 1987. Singh also testified inconsistently regarding the

reasons for his 1991 arrest. In his asylum application, he asserted that he was

arrested for participating in a militant attack in which police officers were killed. 

At his hearing before the IJ, he testified that he was arrested for hosting militants

and supplying them with food. He also provided inconsistent testimony regarding

his 1990 detention. In his asylum application, he asserted that both he and his

father had been hung upside down, but he omitted that detail at his hearing before

the IJ, even when pressed. These inconsistencies go to the heart of Singh’s asylum

claim and therefore support the adverse credibility determination. See Singh v.

Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1108-09 (9th Cir. 2006).

Singh argues that the BIA erred by citing his failure to offer corroborating

evidence as additional support for its adverse credibility determination. We agree. 

Under Sidhu v. INS, 220 F.3d 1085, 1091 (9th Cir. 2000), “[t]he petitioner must be

given an opportunity at his IJ hearing to explain his failure to produce material

2
corroborating evidence.” That did not occur here. This error, however, is not

alone sufficient to set aside the adverse credibility finding. See Wang v. INS, 352

F.3d 1250, 1259 (9th Cir. 2003) (“So long as one of the identified grounds is

supported by substantial evidence and goes to the heart of [Singh’s] claim of

persecution, we are bound to accept the IJ’s adverse credibility finding.”).

PETITION DENIED.

3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2015

t0421 

# Order

Clerk April 24, 2015

150307

SUSAN BAILEY,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150307

COA: 321655

Ingham CC: 13

- 000806

- CK

GREAT LAKES MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 11, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for

considerati on as on leave granted. We direct the Court of Appeals’ attention to Ellis v

Farm Bureau Ins Co, 482 Mich 1119 (2008).
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher Paterson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Cantop Ventures, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended
January 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Cantop Ventures, Inc.

Date: March 10, 2008


/s/ Christopher Paterson
--------------------------------------
Christopher Paterson
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
(Principal Financial Officer)