# APPENDIX B: Data Sheets for Existing Products

### Table of Contents

Product Rulemaking Priority Page Product Rulemaking Priority Page Commercial Air-Cooled Central A/C & Air-Source HP, 65-240 kBtu/h Standards High B-I High Intensity Discharge Lamps Determination High B-27 Central A/C & HP, 3 phase, < 65 kBtu/h Standards Medium B-2 Test Procedure Low B-28 Clothes Dryers Standards Low B-3 Lamps, Fluorescent Standards Low B-29 Test Procedure Low B-4 Test Procedure Low B-30 Clothes Washers Standards* Low B-5 Lamps, Incandescent General Service Standards Low B-3I Test Procedure* Low B-6 Test Procedure Low B-32Commercial Water-Cooled A/C & WaterSource Heat Pumps Standards Low B-7 Lamps, Incandescent Reflector Standards Low B-33 Commercial A/C & HP (all types & sizes) Test Procedure High B-8 Test Procedure Low B-34 Commercial Furnaces Standards Low B-9 Packaged Terminal A/C & Heat Pumps Standards High B-35 Commercial Oil and Gas-Fired Packaged Boilers Standards High B-10 Plumbing Fixtures/Fittings Standards Low B-36
Test Procedure High B-II Test Procedure Low B-37 Commercial Furnaces Test Procedure High B-12 Pool Heaters, Gas Standards Low B-38 Commercial Water Heaters Standards Low B-13 Test Procedure* Low B-39 Test Procedure High B-14 Refrigerators Standards* Low B-40 Cooking Products Standards Low B-15 Test Procedure Low - Med for Compacts B-41 Test Procedure Low B-16 Residential Central A/C & HP (Small Duct High Velocity) Standards High B-42 Direct Heating Equipment, Gas Standards Low B-17 Test Procedure High B-43 Test Procedure* Low B-18 Res. Central A/C & HP - Ductless Split Test Procedure Medium B-44 Dishwashers Standards Medium B-19 Residential Furnaces and Boilers Standards High B-45
Test Procedure High B-20 Test Procedure* Low B-46 Distribution Transformers Standards High B-21 Residential Water Heaters Standards* Low B-47
Test Procedure High B-22 Test Procedure* Low B-48 Electric Motors, 1-200 HP Standards Low B-23 Room Air Conditioners Standards* Low B-49 Test Procedure* Low B-24 Test Procedure Low B-50 Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts* Standards Low B-25 Tankless Gas-Fired Instantaneous Water Heater Standards Standards High B-51 Test Procedure Low B-26 Small Electric Motors Determination High B-52
Test Procedure Low B-53 * Final Rules for these products have been recently published

### Summary of Priorities Standards and Determinations (D) High Priority Products Page Low Priority Products (cont.) Page Commercial Air-Cooled Central Air Conditioners and Air-Source Heat Pumps, 65-240 kBtu/h B-1 Commercial Furnaces* B-9 Distribution Transformers B-21 Commercial Water Heaters* B-13 Packaged Terminal Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps B-35 Cooking Products B-15 Residential Central AC/HP (Small Duct High Velocity) B-42 Direct Heating Equipment, Gas B-17 Residential Furnaces and Boilers B-45 Small Electric Motors (D) B-52 Electric Motors, 1-200 HP B-23 High Intensity Discharge Lamps (D) B-27 Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts* B-25 Commercial Oil and Gas-Fired Packaged Boilers B-10
Tankless Gas-Fired Instantaneous Water Heaters B- 51

Medium Priority Products Dishwashers B-19 Lamps, Fluorescent* B-29 Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps, 3 Phase, <65 kBtu/h B-2 Lamps, Incandescent General Service B-31 Lamps, Incandescent Reflector B-33 Plumbing Fixtures/Fittings B-36 Low Priority Products Pool Heaters, Gas B-38 Clothes Dryers B-3 Refrigerators* B-40 Clothes Washers* B-5 Residential Water Heaters* B-47Commercial Water-Cooled A/C and WaterSource Heat Pumps* B-7 Room Air Conditioners* B-49 *Final Rules for these products have recently been published.High Priority Products Page Low Priority Products (cont.) Page

Commercial A/C and Heat Pumps B-8 Direct Heating Equipment, Gas* B-18 Commercial Furnaces B-12 Commercial Water Heaters B-14 Electric Motors, 1-200 HP* B-24 Dishwashers B-20 Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts B-26 Residential Central A/C and Heat Pump (SDHV) B-43 High Intensity Discharge Lamps B-28 Distribution Transformers B-22 Lamps, Fluorescent B-30 Commercial Oil and Gas-Fired Packaged Boilers B-11 Medium Priority Products Lamps, Incandescent General Service* B-32 Compact Refrigerators B-41 Lamps, Incandescent Reflector* B-34 Ductless Split Central AC/HP B-44 Plumbing Fixtures/Fittings* B-37 Pool Heaters, Gas B-39 Low Priority Products Refrigerators B-41 Clothes Dryers B-4 Residential Furnaces and Boilers* B-46 Clothes Washers* B-6 Residential Water Heaters* B-48 Room Air Conditioners B-50 Cooking Products* B-16 Small Electric Motors B-53 

### Test Procedures

* Final Rules for these products have been recently published

## Standards

Product: Commercial Air-Cooled Central Air Conditioners and Air-Source Heat Pumps, 65-240 kBtu/h Priority: High

Potential Energy Savings 0.50' (to go beyond ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1999 levels) from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2005- 2030 Potential Economic 0.4 (estimated NPV, billions of $1998) Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Carbon emissions reduction - est. 7 million tons. Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes DOE plans to publish Final Rule to incorporate the test procedures referred to in to Test Procedures ASHRAE Standard 90.1 into the CFR early in FY 2002. See page 8. Other Regulatory Actions Possible State and regional environmental regulation (e.g. air quality). Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market-Driven or None known. Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues Revised ASHRAE 90.1 standards approved June 1999, which would save an estimated 2.2 quads from 2005-2030. DOE will consider higher standards for additional energy savings. FY 2002 Priority High Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level DOE initiated a rulemaking in FY 2002. Energy savings are significant.

1 Based on Screening Analysis Report for Commercial HVAC Standards, see 65 FR 30929.

## Standards

Product: Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps, 3 phase, <65 kBtu/h Priority : Medium

Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2004 - 2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market- Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements ssues
FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level SEER 13 standard level = 2.912 SEER 12 standard level = 2.172 SEER 13 = (0.7) (NPV, billions of $1998) SEER 12 = 1.1 (NPV, billions of $1998) Carbon emissions reduction: SEER 12 = 34 million tons, SEER 13 = 43 million tons DOE plans to publish Final Rule to incorporate the test procedures referred to in ASHRAE Standard 90.1 into the CFR early in FY 2002. See page 8. Possible State and regional environmental regulation (e.g. air quality).
None known.
Revised ASHRAE 90.1 standards approved June 1999. Efficiencies of these products were left unchanged . Single

-phase products are regulated by NAECA, and it is desirable to have the same standards for single and three phase products. A DOE rulemaking is in progress for single phase products. Medium

DOE plans to initiate rulemaking for three phase equipment when rulemaking for residential (single phase) products is completed. Energy savings are significant.

2 Based on Screening Analysis Report for Commercial HVAC Standards, see 65 FR 30929.

## Standards

Product : Clothes Dryers - (Gas/Electric) Priority: Low
Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2008 - 2030 Potential Economic BenefitsBurdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market
-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues
FY 2002 Priority

Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level Heat Pump Elec. Dryer (5.5 EF) = 3.8 Microwave Elec. Dryer (3.5 EF) = 1.2 Modulating Gas Dryer (2.8 EF) = 0.06 Heat Pump Electric Dryer (5.2 EF) = 3.5 Not available Not available Reduced annual cycles needs to be considered, definitions and creation of new product class for condensing dryers. DOE regulation of clothes washers. DOE regulation of white goods for full line manufacturers. There appears to be a general consensus among stakeholders that updating clothes dryer standards should be given low priority. At least three U.S. manufacturers are marketing high efficiency clothes washers, which are likely to have improved moisture extraction. Significant dryer savings potential has been considered in clothes washer rulemaking (greater moisture extraction). Mechanical extraction has been estimated to be much more cost effective than thermal extraction. New electric dryers advertise 30% reduction in energy usage. Low

DOE does not plan to actively pursue rulemaking in the next year. Work would be limited to basic technology investigation and monitoring of voluntary programs. Interested Parties believe this is a low priority product. Other DOE standards will impose cumulative burden on white goods manufacturers.

## Test Procedure

Product: Clothes Dryers - (Gas/Electric) Priority: Low
Relationship to Changes in Test Procedure needs to be changed for standard. Standard Priority of Standard Low International or Other CSA has conducted specialized dryer tests and has asked DOE to consider revisions Coordinating Activities to the test procedure. Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues

Proposed Schedule and Rationale: A new product class needs to be defined for condenser dryers; currently there is one waiver in effect. Numerous changes that are required prior to a standards rulemaking for clothes dryers, including the investigation of the same test cloth issues as for the clothes washer rulemaking.

Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level Considered to be a low priority by stakeholders.

## Standards

Product: Clothes Washers Priority: Low Factors for Priority Setting Assessment

Total range considered: [0.28 - 7.70]4 Specific examples below: Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Eff iciency Improvement Cumulative (Quads) Over the Base Case MEF Range of Energy Savings 2004-2030 5% 0.860 0.28-0.28 10% 0.908 0.93-0.94 15% 0.961 1.74-1.76 20% 1.021 2.13-2.15 25% 1.089 4.06-4.08 35% 1.257 5.94-6.09 40% 1.362 5.98-6.13 45% 1.485 6.98-7.28 50% 1.634 7.36-7.70 The 1.0 Final Rule energy savings equals 5.5 quads over 2004-2030. Required MEF of 4 in 2004 and 1.26 in 2007. Potential Economic The Net Present Value (NPV) is $15.3 billion cumulative from 2004 to 2030 in 1997 Benefits/Burdens dollars. Potential Environmental or For period 2004- 2030, 95 million metric tons of carbon and 254 thousand metric Energy Security Benefits ton s of NO,. Status of Required Changes Final Rule issued January 12, 2001. Changes to the test procedure were incorporated to Test Procedures into the standards rulemaking. Other Regulatory Actions DOE regulation of clothes dryers. DOE regulation of white goods for full line Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market
-Driven ma
Conufacturers. nsortium for Energy Efficiency program with utilities. Energy Star program. or Voluntary Efficiency Federal Energy Management Program for procurement initiative. At least three U.S. Improvements manufacturers are marketing high efficient clothes washers. Issues FY 2002 Priority High Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule
Rationale for Priority Level ANOPR - Published November, 1998 NOPR - July, 2000 Final Rule - January, 2001 Final Rule published January 12, 2001. Reviewed April 12, 2001. 4 Based on DOE Technical Support Document, January 2001.

## Test Procedure

Product: Clothes Washers Priority: Low
Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline ssues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Test Procedure was changed as part of the standards rulemaking. Low

Proposed Schedule I Published as part of standards rulemaking. NOPR - July, 2000. Final Rule January, 2001. Rationale for Priority Level ( Test procedure was revised recently to implement the standards rlemaking.

## Standards

Product: Commercial Air Conditioners & Heat Pumps (All products for which DOE proposes to accept ASHRAE 90.1-1999

levels) Priority: Low
Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2005- 2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level 0.65 (ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1999)

Not available. Specific estimates of emission reductions have not been developed however, energy savings indicated above are indicative of the comparative emission benefits that are likely to be possible. Expected oil savings are minimal. DOE plans to publish Final Rules to incorporate the test procedures referred to in ASHRAE Standard 90.1 into the CFR early in FY 2002. EPA phase out of HCFC refrigerants.

None known. Revised ASHRAE 90.1 standards approved June, 1999. High

Notice of Availability 5/00. Final Rule published January 12, 2001. Standards set by EPACT were amended to adopt revised ASHRAE 90.1. No further action. 5 Based on Screening Analysis Report for Commercial HVAC Standards, see 65 FR 30929.

## Test Procedure

Product : Commercial Air Conditioners & Heat Pumps (DOE accepts ASHRAE 90.1-1999 test procedures for all commercial

air conditioner and heat pump products.) Priority: High
Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Standards set by EPACT have been amended upon revision of ASHRAE 90.1 as of January 12, 2001. Low for most products.

NOPR - June, 2000 Rationale for Priority Level I Final Rule should be published in FY2003

## Standards

Product: Commercial Furnaces Priority: Low

Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2005- 2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market- Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale 0.56 (ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1999)

Not available. Specific estimates of emission reductions have not been developed however, estimated energy savings indicated above are indicative of the comparative emission benefits that are likely to be possible. Expected oil savings are minimal. DOE plans to publish Final Rule to incorporate the test procedures referred to in ASHRAE Standard 90.1 into the CFR early in FY 2002. Possible State and regional environmental regulation (e.g. air quality).
None known.
Revised ASHRAE 90.1 standards approved June, 1999. High

Proposed Schedule Notice of Availability May, 2000. Final Rule published January 12, 2001. Rationale for Priority Level Standards set by EPACT were amended to adopt revised ASHRAE 90.1. No further action.

6 Based on Screening Analysis Report for Commercial HVAC Standards, see 65 FR 30929.

## Standards

Product : Commercial Oil and Gas-Fired Packaged Boilers Priority: High

Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2004- 2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market
-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level 0.287 (to go beyond ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1999 levels)
0.2 (NPV, billions of $1998) Carbon emissions reduction - 4 million tons. DOE plans to publish Final Rule to incorporate the test procedures referred to in ASHRAE Standard 90.1 into the CFR early in FY 2002. Possible State and regional environmental regulation (e.g. air quality).
None known. Revised ASHRAE 90.1 standards approved June 1999, which would save an estimated 0.06 quads from 2001
-2030 . DOE will consider higher standards for additional energy savings. N/A

DOE plans to initiate work in support of rulemaking in FY 2003. Energy savings are significant.

7 Based on Screening Analysis Report for Commercial HVAC Standards, see 65 FR 30929.



## B-10

## Test Procedure

Product: Commercial Oil and Gas-Fired Packaged Boilers Priority: High
Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Standards set by EPACT are being amended upon revision of ASHRAE 90.1

NOPR - August, 2000 Rationale for Priority Level I Final rule should be published in FY2003.

## Test Procedure

Product : Commercial Furnaces Priority: High
Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Standards set by EPACT have been amended upon revision of ASHRAE 90.1 as of January 12, 2001. Low

NOPR - December, 1999 Rationale for Priority Level I Final rule should be published in FY2003



## B-12

## Standards

Product: Commercial Water Heaters Priority: Low
Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2005- 2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions 0.078

Not available. Specific estimates of emission reductions have not been developed however, estimated energy savings indicated above are indicative of the comparative emission benefits that are likely to be possible. Expected oil savings are minimal. DOE plans to publish the Final Rule to incorporate the test procedures referred to in ASHRAE Standard 90.1 into the CFR early in FY 2002. Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market- Driven or None known. Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues Revised ASHRAE 90.1 standards approved June 1999. FY 2002 Priority High Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Notice of Availability May, 2000. Final Rule January, 2001. Rationale for Priority Level Standards set by EPACT have been amended to adopt revised ASHRAE 90.1- 1999 levels for gas- and oil
-fired storage water heaters

8 Based on Screening Analysis Report for Commercial HVAC Standards, see 65 FR 30929.



## B-13

## Test Procedure

Product: Commercial Water Heaters Priority: High
Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Standards set by EPACT have been amended upon revision of ASHRAE 90.1 as of January 12, 2001 Low ASHRAE is in process of revising ( SPC 118 . 1). Will include heat pump water heaters.

NOPR - June, 2000 Rationale for Priority Level I Final rule should be published in FY2003



## B-14

## Standards

Product: Cooking Products - Gas & Electric Ovens, Cooktops, and Microwave Ovens Priority: Low
Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 1999 - 2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens
Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits
Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market
-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule
Rationale for Priority Level Total ranges considered (Gas only): 9 Ovens Cooktops [0.2 - 0.4] [0.1 - 0.2] Total ranges considered (Gas only): 9 Ovens Cooktops [(1.4) - 0.2] [(0.9) - 0.1] Cumulative Net Present Value, 1999-2030, billions 1990$ @ 7% discount rate Total ranges considered (Gas and Electric not including Microwave): 9 Ovens Cooktops NOx [I 1 - 239] NOx [ 0 - 65 ] CO2 [6 - 133] CO2 [0-36] Cumulative emission reductions, 1999-2030, in (kt) for NOx, and (Mt) for CO2. DOE regulation of white goods for full line manufacturers.
None known. Pilotless designs may require installation of an electrical outlet. Loss of consumer utility if loss of electrical power. If a loss of electricity, cannot use oven. High (Gas); Low (Electric)

Final Rule, no new standards for electric cooking products including microwave ovens, issued - September 8, 1998 Final Rule gas cooking products - To Be Determined. Potential energy savings are low to moderate. Analysis too old to use - requires new analysis for rulemaking.
9 Based on Draft Report, April 1996 and Supplemental Analysis, November 1997.



## B-15

## Test Procedure

Product: Cooking Products - Gas & Electric Ovens, Cooktops, and Microwave Ovens Priority: Low
Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline ssues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Final Rule issued - October 3, 1997 Rationale for Priority Level



## B-16

## Standards

Product: Direct Heating Equipment (Gas) Priority: Low
Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 1998- 2030

Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level Total range considered: [0 - 0.1]9 Specific examples below:10

[(1.4) - 0.1] NPV, Billions of 1990$ @ 7%

0 0.1 (0.6) (1.4) SOz 0 (7) (140) (320) NOx 0 (6) (132) (301) CO2 0 (3) (72) (165) Emission reductions in (kt) for SO2 and NOx, and (Mt) for CO2. Final rule published 5/12/97. None known that will impact product.
None known. Fuel switching. Rural communities use for backup heating during power outages. Utility concern with electronic ignition. Low

DOE does not plan to actively pursue rulemaking in the next year. Work would be limited to basic technology investigation and monitoring of voluntary programs. Interested parties believe this is a low priority product. Potential energy savings are low.

9 Based on DOE preliminary analysis , June 1995. 10 Examples shown for design options and AFUE are for gravity wall heaters (27 - 46 kBtu/hr).



## B-17

## Test Procedure

Product: Direct Heating Equipment (Gas) Priority: Low 0 i l! ; _x., ^ Al , I Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Test Procedure not needed to be changed for standard Low

Proposed Schedule Final Rule issued May 12, 1997. Rationale for Priority Level



## B-18

## Standards

Product : Dishwashers Priority : Medium
Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2008 - 2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market
-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Best Available (as listed in Energy Star) (1.05 EF) = 1.4 Soil Sensor = 0.9 Current Energy Star Dishwasher (0.58 EF) = 0.4 Not available. Not available. Test procedure is being revised to better reflect energy consumption for new technologies (e.g. adaptive controls ) and reduced annual cycles. DOE regulation for energy efficiency of other white goods for full line manufacturers. Some manufacturers believe that updating the dishwasher standard should be given a low priority. Energy Savers program . Federal Energy Management Program for procurement initiative . At least two U.S. manufacturers are marketing adaptive control dishwashers . ENERGY STAR program. Increased efficiency may impact product utility (e.g. may require pre-rinsing of dishes or cleaning of filters ) or the availability of affordable models (contract housing). Possible increase in standby energy consumption from displays. Low

Proposed Schedule DOE does not plan to actively pursue rulemaking in the next year. Work would be limited to basic technology investigation and monitoring of voluntary programs. Rationale for Priority Level Estimated potential energy savings of the ENERGY STAR level are low; the "Best Available" level is not appropriate for rulemaking.



## B-19Product: Dishwashers

Priority: High
Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule
Rationale for Priority Level 

## Test Procedure

Test Procedure needed to be changed for standard. Low Efforts underway to harmonize international test procedures should include dishwashers. Manufacturers support a test procedure revision for more accurate testing of new adaptive control models . Industry working on revising its test procedure suggestions to encompass the variety of sensor techniques now in the market. New technology in product , i.e. smart controls , fuzzy logic.

NOPR -published September, 1999 Reopening Notice - July, 2000 Final Rule -Second half of 2002 New technology in product, i.e. smart controls, fuzzy logic (e.g., dirt sensors).



## B-20

## Standards

Product : Distribution Transformers Priority: High
Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 1995- 2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule
Rationale for Priority Level [0.39-10.7] 12

Not available. Specific estimates of emission reductions have not been developed however, estimated energy savings indicated above are indicative of the comparative emission benefits that are likely to be possible. Expected oil savings are minimal. Need to publish a test procedure before rule. None known. EPA Energy Star program for liquid immersion transformers . NEMA is TP-l promotes energy efficient electrical products. NEMA recommends adoption of voluntary standards as specified in TP-1. Potential energy savings from regulatory action questioned by NEMA. High

ANOPR - 3/03 NOPR - 03/04 Final Rule 9/04. Potential for significant energy savings through regulatory action under EPCA, as amended by EPAct.

12 Based on DOE determination notice, October 22, 1997.Product: Distribution Transformers

Priority: High
Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule

Rationale for Priority Level 

## Test Procedure

Test Procedure needs to be established for standard. High NEMA recommends using NEMA TP-2 test standard. Sampling Plan; Definitions of Covered Products, Basic Mode Definition.

NOPR -published November 12, 1998 Reopening Notice - June, 1999 SNOPR - 4/03 Final Rule 10/03 Test procedure needs to established for Standard rulemaking in FY 2003.



## B-22

## Standards

Product : Electric Motors, 1 - 200 HP Priority: Low

^jp-C ? dog Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market
-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule
Rationale for Priority Level Estimated 31.3 billion kWh/yr (0.106Quad/yr) could be saved through enforcement of EPCA standards that became effective 1997. Certification program to take effect in early 2003. Not Available. Not Available. Final rule for test procedures published October 5, 1999. None known that will impact product. Enforcement ASHRAE 90. 1. Consortium for Energy Efficiency program with utilities. Motor Challenge . Motor Master+. NEMA Premium efficient motors programs. DOE regulates system efficiencies (e.g. HVAC ) where motors are components of such systems. Low

DOE does not plan to actively pursue rulemaking in the next two years. Work would be limited to basic technology investigation and monitoring of voluntary programs. Interested Parties believe this is a low priority product. Potential energy savings are unknown at this time. Determination required by EPCA



## B-23

## Test Procedure

Product : Electric Motors, 1 - 200 HP Priority: Low
Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues
Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level Test Procedure needed to be revised to support the standard Low Natural Resources Canada: Energy Efficiency Regulations for Electric Motors International Electro technical Commission/International Standards Organization (IEC/ISO) Manufacturers and energy efficiency advocates support test procedure rulemaking. Expect DOE test procedure to be revised for compatibility with global (IEC/ISO) test procedure.

Proposed Rule Issued
- November 27, 1997 Final Rule - October 5, 1999 Final Rule recently published.Product : Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts

Priority: Low
Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2005-2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level 

## Standards

1.2-2.3

1.4 - 2.6 NPV , billions of 1997$ @ 7%

None required. In Canada, Natural Resources Canada has proposed to adopt similar ballast standards with an effective date in 2005 (for both new and replacement ballasts). EPA Green Lights and Energy Star Buildings, ASHRAE 90.1, DOE's FEMP Procurement Guidelines and Federal Relighting Initiative, EPAct 1992 Voluntary Luminaire Testing and Rating Program, The Energy Cost Savings Council, and some utility DSM programs.
Low

Final Rule -published in September, 2000 Final Rule published in FY2000.



## B-25

## Test Procedure

Product: Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts Priority: Low

Relationship to Changes in Efficiency levels for new standards are already in the market and are covered by Standard existing standards and test procedures. Priority of Standard Low International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level



## B-26

## Standards Determination

Product: High Intensity Discharge (HID) Lamps Priority: High

Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 1995- 2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market
-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule 1.4

Not Available. Specific estimates of emission reductions have not been developed IES and ANSI procedures are in place. Issues with definitions, covered products and sampling. EPA mercury disposal requirements apply. Market-driven replacement of inefficient mercury vapor lamps with metal halide and high-pressure sodium lamps has occurred but the Department does not expect this trend to continue into the future.
Low

DOE plans to move this activity to a high priority. Rationale for Priority Level ( Determination required by EPACT.

## Test Procedure

Product : High Intensity Discharge (HID) Lamp Priority: Low

Relationship to Changes in Test Procedure needs to be developed for standard. Standard Priority of Standard Low International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level I No work expected during FY2003.



## B-28

## Standards

Product: Lamps, Fluorescent Priority: Low

Potential Energy Savings Best Available FEMP procurement recommendation levels (4-foot, 8-foot, and Ufrom Regulatory Action; tube lamps) = 0.47 Cumulative (Quads) 2008
- 2030 Recommended FEMP procurement recommendation levels (4-foot, 8-foot, and Utube lamps) = 0.14 Potential Economic Not Available. Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Not Available. Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes IES and ANSI procedures are in place, DOE test procedure Final Rule issued May to Test Procedures 29, 1997. Other Regulatory Actions Existing EPA mercury disposal requirements apply, but EPA issued a final rule July 6, 1999, including lamps as Universal Hazardous Waste. Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market-Driven or EPA Green Lights/Energy Star Buildings, ASHRAE 90.1, FEMP Procurement Voluntary Efficiency Guidelines and Federal Relighting Initiative, and some utility DSM programs. Improvements Issues Because lamps are components of systems, establishment of standards is more difficult. FY 2002 Priority Low Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level DOE does not plan to actively pursue rulemaking in the next year. Low energy savings potential.



## B-29

## Test Procedure

Product : Lamps, Fluorescent Priority: Low

it Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level Test Procedure changes not needed for standard
Low

I Final Rule issued May 29, 1997



## B-30

## Standards

Product: Lamps, Incandescent General Service Priority: Low

Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2008 - 2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market
-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level 17% efficacy increase (halogen lamp)= 8.52 3% efficacy increase = 1.57 1.5% efficacy increase = 0.80 Not Available. Not Available. IES and ANSI procedures are in place, DOE test procedure Final Rule issued May 29, 1997.

EPA Green Lights/Energy Star Buildings, ASHRAE 90.1, FEMP Federal Relighting Initiative, and some utility DSM programs, Voluntary Luminaire Testing and Rating Program. Because lamps are components of systems, establishment of standards is more difficult. Low

DOE does not plan to actively pursue rulemaking in the next year Low priority because the more efficient technologies do not appear to be economically viable for this very mature technology.

## Test Procedure

Product: Lamps, Incandescent General Service Priority: Low

Relationship to Changes in I Test Procedure changes not needed for standard. Standard Priority of Standard Low International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level I Final Rule issued May 29, 1997



## B-32

## Standards

Product: Lamps, Incandescent Reflector Priority: Low

Potential Energy Savings Currently Regulated Currently Unregulated from Regulatory Action ; 30% efficacy increase (HIR) = 1.44 54% efficacy increase (HIR) = 2.26 Cumulative (Quads) 2008
- 3% efficacy increase = 0.18 18% efficacy increase (H) = 1.0 2030 1.5% efficacy increase = 0.09 1.5% efficacy increase = 0.1 Note: Halogen (H); Halogen Infrared Reflector (HIR) Potential Economic Not Available. Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Not Available. Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes IES and ANSI procedures are in place, DOE test procedure Final Rule issued May to Test Procedures 29, 1997. Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market
-Driven or EPA Green Lights/Energy Star Buildings, ASHRAE 90.1, FEMP Federal Voluntary Efficiency Relighting Initiative, and some utility DSM programs, Voluntary Luminaire Improvements Testing and Rating Program. Issues Because lamps are components of systems, establishment of standards is more difficult. FY 2001 Priority Low Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule
Rationale for Priority Level DOE plans to assess whether to classify currently exempt incandescent reflector lamps as covered products. Based on completion of assessment.



## B-33

## Test Procedure

Product: Lamps, Incandescent Reflector Priority: Low

- __ -

^^{^ u) l^n9CtJ t e!L Tip rt ^_^Idi^r ^ Relationship to Changes in Test Procedure changes not needed for standard. Standard Priority of Standard Low International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level I Final Rule issued May 29, 1997



## B-34

## Standards

Product: Packaged Terminal Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Priority: High

Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2004 - 2030 Potential Economic BenefitsBurdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market- Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level 0.5617 (to go beyond ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1999 replacement equip. levels) 0.0317 (to go beyond ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1999 new construction equip. levels) 0.6 above replacement equip. levels (NPV, billions of $1998) .01 above new construction equip. levels (NPV, billions of $1998) Carbon emissions reduction = 8 million tons (above replacement equip. levels), 1 million tons (above new construction equip. levels) DOE plans to publish Final Rules to incorporate the test procedures referred to in ASHRAE Standard 90.1 into the CFR by September 2001. EPA phase out of HCFC refrigerants.

None known. Revised ASHRAE 90.1 standards approved 6/99, which would save an estimated 0.11 quads from 2001-2030. DOE will consider higher standards for additional energy savings. High

DOE plans to initiate rulemaking in FY2003. Energy savings are significant.

17 Based on Screening Analysis Report for Commercial HVAC Standards, see 65 FR 30929.



## B-35

## Standards

Product: Plumbing Fixtures/Fittings Priority: Low

Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market
-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level The Department has not conducted any recent analysis regarding potential energy savings for this product. Not available. Not available.

None.

None known. As flow rates and water consumption decline the effects on utility need to be carefully considered. Low

DOE does not plan to actively pursue rulemaking in the next year. Work would be limited to basic technology investigation and monitoring of voluntary programs. Dependent upon revision by ASME and approval by ANSI to ASME/ANSI Al 12.18.1 and ASME/ANSI Al 12.19.6.



## B-36

## Test Procedure

Product: Plumbing Fixtures/Fittings Priority: Low

Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level Low

I Final Rule - March 18, 1998



## B-37

## Standards

Product: Pool Heaters (Gas) Priority: Low i Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2000-2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens
Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits
Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level Total range considered: [0.2 - 0.9] 18 Specific examples below: IID, (78% ET) Non-condensing limit, (82.2% ET) Condensing , (90.8% ET) 0.2 0.4 0.7 Total range: [ (1.4) - 0.2 ] 16 Cumulative Net Present Value, Billions 1990$ @ 7% IID, (78% ET) 0.2 Non-condensing limit , (82.2% ET)

0.2 IID, (78% ET) NOx 42 CO2 I1 Condensing, (90.8% ET) (0.6) Non-cond. limit, (82.2% ET) Condensing, (90.8% ET)

42 42 18 35 Cumulative Emission reductions in (kt) for SO2 and NOx, and (Mt) for CO2 Final rule issued 5/12/97. None known that will impact product.

None known.

Low

DOE does not plan to actively pursue rulemaking in the next year. Work would be limited to basic technology investigation and monitoring of voluntary programs. Interested Parties believe this is a low priority product. Potential energy savings are low.

18 Based on DOE preliminary analysis, June 1995.



## B-38

## Test Procedure

Product: Pool Heaters (Gas) Priority: Low
i i 1797L1'. Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level Test Procedure not needed to be changed for standard.
Low

Final rule issued May 12, 1997.



## B-39

## Standards

Product : Refrigerators, Refrigerator/Freezers, & Freezers Priority: Low

Potential Energy Savings Energy Star (-l0% more efficient) = 1.4019 from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 1998- 2030 Potential Economic Not available Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Not available Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes No changes required for standards. to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions EPA phase out of insulation HCFCs in 2003. DOE regulation of white goods for full line manufacturers. Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market-Driven or Super Efficient Refrigerator Program (Golden Carrot). New York Housing Voluntary Efficiency Authority mass procurement. Energy Savers program. Significant quantities of Improvements new high efficiency models are being marketed. Issues Final Rule Issued - April 28, 1997. FY 2002 Priority Low Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level Final Rule Issued - April 28, 1997 Rule issued , effective July 1, 2001
19 Based on LBNL rough estimate, September, 2001. No formal analysis has been conducted for Department since the Final Rule was issued in 1997.



## B-40

## Test Procedure

Product: Refrigerators, Refrigerator/Freezers, & Freezers Priority : Medium for compact refrigerators and refrigerator/freezers, Low for all others.

Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues

Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule

Rationale for Priority Level Test Procedure not needed to be changed for standard.
Low

Tests at NIST have revealed deficiencies in the compact refrigerator test procedure. These will be researched and corrected, probably by revising the test procedure for compact refrigerators.

NIST tested compact refrigerators, and proposed a modification of the compact refrigerator test procedure. A rulemaking to modify the test procedure will begin in 2002. A separate Direct Final Rule to make a small modification to the defrost calculations for some models will be completed in September 2002. Compact refrigerator manufacturers have obtained inconsistent results when testing each other's products. Deficiencies in test procedure have been identified.

## Standards

Product: Residential Central Air Conditioners & Heat Pumps ( Small Duct High Velocity) Priority : High - drops to Low priority upon completion of Small Duct High Velocity (SDHV)

(qil 1011 1=1 yaiml ^ Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2006 - 2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule

Rationale for Priority Level N/A

SDHV test procedures will be conducted concurrently with the standards.

Separate rulemaking being conducted SDHV. High

SANOPR - November, 1999 NOPR - October, 2000 Final Rule - January 22, 2001 Supplemental NOPR (Final Rule withdrawn) - July 25, 2001. Final Rule - May 23, 2002 Separate class needed for SDHV.



## B-42

### Test Procedure

Product: Residential Central Air Conditioners & Heat Pumps (SDHV) Priority: High

Relationship to Changes in Test Procedure for SDHV will be changed concurrently with the standard Standard rulemaking. Priority of Standard High International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule

Rationale for Priority Level NOPR - published January, 2001 Final Rule to be issued in FY 2003. A separate rulemaking to change the minimum external static test pressure for small duct high velocity units and promulgate new cycle degradation defaults will begin in early FY 2003. Test procedure being conducted concurrent with standards.



## B-43

## Test Procedure

Product : Residential Central Air Conditioners & Heat Pumps - Ductless Split Systems Priority : Medium

Relationship to Changes in I Test Procedure does not need to be changed for standard. Standard Priority of Standard High International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Ductless split system manufacturers would prefer to use calorimeter test. Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Calorimeter test (which is used for room air conditioners) is more suitable and accurate for testing ductless split central air conditioners, but this test is not currently in the DOE central air conditioning test procedure. Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level DOE plans to initiate work in support of rulemaking Change would make test procedure more accurate for this product.



## B-44

## Standards

Product: Residential Furnaces & Boilers Priority: High

Potential Energy Savings Total range considered: [1.8 - 15.1]21 Specific examples below: from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2012 - 2042

Potential Economic I Not available. Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Specific estimates of emission reductions have not been developed however, Energy Security Benefits estimated energy savings indicated above are indicative of the comparative emission benefits that are likely to be possible. Expected oil savings are more significant than other products. Status of Required Changes I Final rule issued May 12, 1997. to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions I Possible State and regional environmental regulation. DOE regulation of central air conditioning/heat pump products. Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market- Driven or Energy Star program. Wisconsin state condensing furnace/boiler program. Voluntary Efficiency ACEEE indicated that trend for higher efficiency products stopped in 1994. Improvements Issues Venting and electricity issues. FY 2002 Priority High Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level Rulemaking was initiated in 2001. Potential energy savings are significant. Higher standards levels requiring technologies such as condensing furnaces would impact utility to consumers.

21 Based on LBNL rough estimate for gas only, September 2001.



## B-45

## Test Procedure

Product: Residential Furnaces & Boilers Priority: Low

- T-f ^^^] f tom) ^. 11 q l,.i___J •^ I r ^rJ l r-^ Relationship to Changes in Test Procedure not needed to be changed for standard. The test procedure for Standard combined space- and water-heating appliances (a separate product class within the standards ndemaking) needs to be developed. Priority of Standard High International or Other ASHRAE SPC 124 has released for public review a test procedure for combined Coordinating Activities appliances. Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level I Final rule issued May 12, 1997.



## B-46

## Standards

Product: Residential Water Heaters - Gas, Oil & Electric Priority: Low Factors for Priority Setting Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2004-2030

Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market- Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Assessment Total ranges considered : 3.3 - 11.522 Specific examples below:

The Final Rule energy savings equals 4 . 6 quads over 2004-2030. The Net Present Value (NPV) is $ 2.0 billion cumulative from 2004 to 2030 in 1997 dollars. For period 2004- 2030 , 152 million metric tons of carbon and 273 thousand metric tons of NO,. Changes not required for standards . Final rule for test procedure was published in 1998. EPA phase out of HCFCs for insulation (2003). Consumer Product Safety Commission initiative for prevention of ignition of flammable vapors by gas water heaters. Demand-side management programs for high efficiency water heaters. Fuel switching. Replacement blowing agent for insulation . Installation in small spaces. High

Proposed Schedule NOPR - April, 2000 Final Rule - January, 2001 Rationale for Priority Level Final Rule published January 17, 2001. Reviewed April 12, 2001. 22 Based on DOE Technical Support Document, January 2001.



## B-47

### Test Procedure

Product: Residential Water Heaters - Gas, Oil & Electric Priority: Low

Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues No change needed
Low

Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level Test procedure published in May, 1998.



## B-48

## Standards

Product: Room Air Conditioners Priority: Low

Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2008-2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market- Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level

23 ---7% more efficient than Energy Star (-10.8 EER) = 0.7223 -15% more efficient than Energy Star (-11.5 EER) = 1.223 Not available Not available Not required for standards. EPA phase out of HCFC-22 refrigerant. DSM programs. Labeling program very effective.
Final Rule Issued
- September 24, 1997 Low

I Final Rule Issued
- September 24, 1997

LBNL estimate, September, 2001. No formal analysis has been conducted for Department since the Final Rule was issued in 1997.



## B-49Product: Room Air Conditioners

Priority: Low 

### I i1 r 6w, 11 CFA Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues

Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level 

## Test Procedure

Test Procedure not needed to be changed for standard Low

There are no other existing or proposed test procedures specifically targeted at room air conditioners. The only possible alternative would be to develop a seasonal energy efficiency measure analogous to the SEER used for central air conditioners. It is uncertain how valuable such a seasonal standard would be in better predicting actual energy usage, as many people tend to use RACs as on-off devices.



## B-50

## Standards

Product : Tankless Gas-Fired Instantaneous Water Heaters Priority: High

Potential Energy Savings from Regulatory Action; Cumulative (Quads) 2004- 2030 Potential Economic Benefits/Burdens Potential Environmental or Energy Security Benefits Status of Required Changes to Test Procedures Other Regulatory Actions Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market
-Driven or Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues FY 2002 Priority Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level 0.1024 (to go beyond ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1999 levels)
0.05 (NPV, billions of $1998) Carbon emissions reduction = 2 million tons. DOE plans to publish the Final Rule to incorporate the test procedures referred in ASHRAE Standard 90.1 into the CFR in 2003.

None known.

Medium

DOE plans to initiate work in support of rulemaking Re-evaluation of ASHRAE Standard 90.1 1999 levels.

24 Based on Screening Analysis Report for Commercial HVAC Standards, see 65 FR 30929.

## Standards Determination

Product: Small Electric Motors Priority: High

Potential Energy Savings Cumulative net present value est. $.6 - 1 billion for certain single phase motors, from Regulatory Action ; cumulative net present value est. $.09 - .29 billion for certain poly phase motors. Cumulative (Quads) 1998- 2030 [0.6 - I for certain single phase motors]25 [0.15 - .2 for certain poly phase motors] Potential Economic I Not available. BeneftsBurdens Potential Environmental or Specific estimates of emission reductions have not been developed however, Energy Security Benefits estimated energy savings indicated above are indicative of the comparative emission benefits that are likely to be possible. Expected oil savings are minimal. Status of Required Changes IEEE 114 - 2001 test procedure for single-phase induction motors was published to Test Procedures May 24, 2002. IEEE 112 - 1996 test procedure for poly phase motors is in effect. Other Regulatory Actions Small motors used in NAECA "covered products" (e.g. white goods) and certain commercial equipment are exempt. Recommendations by Interested Parties Evidence of Market- Driven or None known. Voluntary Efficiency Improvements Issues None. FY 2002 Priority Medium Proposed Schedule and Rationale Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level DOE plans to publish determination in FY2003. Determination required by EPCA.

25 Based on draft DOE report, April 2002. Other estimates are in preparation and should be ready by the end of 2002.



## B-52

## Test Procedure

Product: Small Electric Motors Priority: Low

Relationship to Changes in Standard Priority of Standard International or Other Coordinating Activities Recommendation by Interested Parties Statutory Deadline Issues Proposed Schedule and Rationale: Proposed Schedule Rationale for Priority Level Low

I Dependent upon Determination. 1T1,]!IJ



## B-53