alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Lease
Agreement

    


    Party A:
Dachang Hui Autonomous County, Xiadian Town, Xiaodingfu Village
Committee

    Party B:
Baosheng Steel Products Company Ltd

    


    Both
parties enter into an agreement by which Party B will rent land from Party A,
through consultation of the Bureau of Land Management of county, town, and
development zone, we agree and commonly adhere to the following
conditions:

    


    
      	
              1.

            	
              Party
      B will rent an area the size of 46.23 mu in land from Party
      A.  The rent term is 20 years, begins on
    2005-11-11.

            


    

    
      	
              2.

            	
              Party
      B should pay 600RMB/ mu/ year as compensation. Total fee is
      27,738RMB/year, Party B will pay compensation by year, and shall pay the
      total annual fee before November 11th
      of every year.

            


    

    
      	
              3.

            	
              During
      the period of rental term, Party A shall allow Party B to build temporary
      structures, Party B pledges that they will not build structures in
      perpetuity.

            


    

    
      	
              4.

            	
              Party
      A will be responsible for the removal of all tombs from the land out
      within one month that from the sign date, with reasonable fees to be paid
      by Party B.

            


    

    
      	
              5.

            	
              After
      this agreement is executed, Party A shall assist to communicate with
      villagers, and will not be allowed to interfere with Party B for any
      reason.

            


    

    
      	
              6.

            	
              This
      agreement will be effective from the sign date, in duplicate, one for each
      party.

            


    

    


    
      
        
          
            	
                    Party
      A:  Xiaoding Fu Village Committee

                  	 	
                    Party
      B: Baosheng Steel Products Co.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier:

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet


### Replace Disk 48.0 $4,080.0 0 $ 

### 73 ,000 $77,080.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in co mpliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Conditi**  **on Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : 

### ASE estimated cost based on pro

- rata reduction on the life of the disk (9,700 cycles vs ALS 11,610 cycles), which applies to all 20 disks. Disk cost provided by RR plc ($443,000 for a new disk).

### Executive Order 12 **866:**

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a su bstantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
Order entered June 18, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 01370 - CR JEREMY DEANDRE TAYLO R, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. F - 0760083 - K



### O RDER The clerk’s record filed in the above

- styled appeal is, in large part, a duplicate of the clerk’s record filed in cause no. 05

- 13

- 01369

- CR. It contains documents germane to cause no. 05

- 13

- 01369

- CR. Accordingly, Appella nt’s May 31, 2014 motion to supplement the clerk’s record on appeal is GRANTED
. We STRIKE the clerk’s record filed in this cause on February 19, 2014. We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within TWENTY - ONE DAYS of the date of this order, th e clerk’s record in this case. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the following: Dallas County District Clerk Gary FitzsimmonsThe Dallas County District Clerk, Criminal Records Division

Coun sel for all parties

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

October 10, 2014 

Mr. James D. Wampler 

508 Pheasant Run 

Zionsville, IN 46077- 9666 

Dear Mr. Wampler: 

This is in response to your November 6, 2009 letter sent to the public docket (Docket No. 

FAA-2009-1061) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to initiate 

rulemaking to hold operator an d operator holding company principal management 

personnel accountable for their actions, separate from action against the operator business 

entity and operator certificate. Specifically, the petition for rulemaking requested the 

FAA to amend §§ 119.65, 119.67, 119.69, and 119.71 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). 

In accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73, the FAA must use the following criteria when 

making a decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition 

for rulemaking: 

1) The immediacy of the safety or security concerns you raise; 

2) The priority of other issues the FAA must deal with; and 

3) The resources we have available to address these issues. 

Each year, the FAA prioritizes its rulemaking projects based on issues that are crucial to 

the safety of the aviation community and the traveling public to ensure the FAA delivers 

the most value to the aviation system. 

After reviewing your request based on the current priorities for the FAA and the 

guidelines found in § 11.73, we determined the issue you raised does not meet the criteria 

to pursue rulemaking at this time. However, your comments and arguments for the 

proposed rule change in your petition will be placed in a database, which we will 

examine when we consider future rulemaking. 

If the FAA does pursue rulemaking in this area in the future, you would be able to find 

out and track it through one of the two following websites: 
2

 For significant rulemakings, you can find the status on the Department of 

Transportation’s (DOT) website (http://www.dot.gov/regulations/report-onsignificant-rulemakings). 

 For non-significant rulemakings, you can find the status on the DOT’s semi-annual 

regulatory agenda, through the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affair’s (OIRA) Unified Agenda website 

(http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain). 

For the reasons above, we are dismissing your petition for rulemaking in accordance with 

14 CFR § 11.73. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Lirio Liu 

Director, Office of Rulemaking
# Federal Aviation Administration Small UAS Certificate of Registration CERTIFICATE HOLDER: 

## Randall Hawkins UAS CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 

## FA3N7C7FXL ISSUED: 

# 12/22/2015 EXPIRES : 

# 12/21/2018 For U.S. citi zens , permanent residents. and certain non-citi zen U.S . corporations , this document constitutes a Certificate ofRegistration. For all others, this document represents a recognition ofownership. For all holders , for all operations other than as a model aircraft under sec. 336 of Pub

. L

. 112-95 , addit ional safety authority from FAA and economic authority from DOTmay be required

. 

### Safety guidelines for flying your unmanned aircraft :

Fly below 400 feet Never fly near other aircraft Keep your UAS within visual Line of 

### sight Keep away from emergency responders Never fly over stadiums , sports events or groups of people Never fly under the influence of drugs or alcohol Never fly within 5 miles of 

### an airport without first contacting air traffic control and airport authorities
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARCUS LAKEITH HARRIS,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00070-CR

Appeal from the

183rd District Court

of Harris County, Texas 

(TC# 159318601010)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until December 7, 2021. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Diogu Kalu Diogu and the Hon. Tanika J. Solomon, 

the Appellant’s attorneys, prepare the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or 

before December 7, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.36 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, U.S. Navy, Toys for Tots, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation-Jacksonville

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 99.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Douglas M.
Pasquale, the Chief Executive Officer, of ARV Assisted Living, Inc., Managing General Partner of American Retirement Villas Properties III, L.P. (ARVP III), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that:



(i)    the annual Form 10K
of the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: March 28, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                     
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 513 

Honoring the 70th anniversary of the Warsaw Uprising. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2014 

Ms. MIKULSKI (for herself, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. RISCH, Mr. KIRK, Mr. MURPHY, 

Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. PORTMAN) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Relations 

JULY 29, 2014 

Reported by Mr. MENENDEZ, without amendment 

JULY 31, 2014 

Considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the 70th anniversary of the Warsaw Uprising. 

Whereas August 1, 2014, marks the 70th anniversary of the 

Warsaw Uprising, a heroic event during World War II 

during which citizens of Poland, against all odds, fought 

against the Nazi occupation of Warsaw; 

Whereas, on August 1, 1944, the Polish Home Army, with 

limited supplies and armed with mostly homemade weapons, rose up against the Nazis to fight the nationwide occupation of Poland by Nazi Germany; 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 513 ATS 

Whereas the Polish resistance fought German forces for 63 

days, suffering extreme hardship, retribution, and personal sacrifice, and during which approximately 250,000 

Poles were killed, wounded, or went missing; 

Whereas Adolf Hitler ordered the destruction of Warsaw as 

punishment for the uprising, leaving 85 percent of the 

city of Warsaw in ruins, including many historical buildings and monuments; 

Whereas the actions of the Polish resistance inspire people 

throughout the world who fight for freedom and democracy; and 

Whereas the actions of the Polish people during the Warsaw 

Uprising were a significant contribution to Allied war efforts during World War II and those actions continue to 

be respected and remembered throughout Poland: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the 70th anni2 versary of the Warsaw Uprising, which occurred during 

3 World War II and serves as a symbol of heroism and the 

4 power of the human spirit. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC

The Flight Shop, Inc. D/B/ AI 

### Professional Air and Aero Facilities, LLC Complainants 

## v. City of Bend, Oregon Municipal Airport Respondent

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME Docket No. 16-14-12

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above

referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16
. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to June 14, 2016. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case .

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March

## ~'J,..!) 

# , 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice of Extension ofTime to June 14, 2016 for FAA Docket 16-14

- 12 addressed to: 

### Counsel for Complainant Leonard D. Kirsch, Esq. McBreen & Kopko 500 North Broadway Jericho, NY 11753 Email: lkirsch@mklawnyc.com Martin E. Hansen, Esq. Francis, Hansen & Martin LLP 1148 NW Hill Street Bend,Oregon 97701 Email: meh @ francishansen.co m 

### Counsel for Respondent Pablo 0. Ni.iesch Katherine M. Mapes Jessica R. Bell Spiegel & McDiarmid LLP 1875 Eye Street N.W. Suite 700 Washington DC 20006 Email: pablo.nuesch@ spiegelmcd.com Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airports Compliance Division, AC0-100 FAAANM 

# II { G

- _

····-··· "--..**(2;;. 414** **~** 

# --:)
..... Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance

and Management Analysis
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41133

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANCISCO JAVIER ACIAIN-PORRAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-03-CR-68-1

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Francisco Javier Aciain-Porras appeals from his guilty-plea

conviction for being illegally present in the United States

following a previous deportation. For the first time on appeal,

Aciain-Porras argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional

on its face and as applied in his case because it does not

require the fact of a prior felony or aggravated felony

conviction to be charged in the indictment and proved beyond a

reasonable doubt. He thus contends that his sentence is invalid
No. 03-41133

-2-

and argues that it should not exceed the two-year maximum term of

imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Aciain-Porras acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed

by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but

asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his

argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule

Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90; United

States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court

must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court

itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 

Accordingly, as Aciain-Porras’s sole argument on appeal is

foreclosed, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (3.46 MB)

Tags:USAFCENT, 380th Expeditionary Civil Engineer Squadron, 380 ECES, ADAB, U.S. Air Force, USCENTCOM, AFCENT, U.S. Central Command, Air Force, CENTCOM, U.S. Air Forces Central Command, UAE, Al Dhafra Air Base, 380 AEW, 380th Air Expeditionary Wing, Power Production, Power Pro, Barrier Maintenance

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
# EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of CurrencySharesSM Euro Trust t (the Trust) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Financial Officer of
Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.    The information
          contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial           condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: February 28, 2007

/s/ NICK BONOS Nick Bonos*Chief
Financial Officer(principal financial officer)

*The Registrant is a trust
and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex
Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.