alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ENTENMANN’S, INC., Petitioner, v. Kenneth W. LATHROP, Respondent.

No. 89SC154.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari GRANTED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

I, Michael J. Pecora, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Unilens Vision Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 15, 2004

/s/ Michael J. Pecora
----------------------------------------
Michael J. Pecora
Principal Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00529-CR

Anthony Devern Session

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1302847D)

April 3, 2014

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier_______________________

 Justice Bill Meier
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 8258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3358]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than February 29, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Moishe Gubin, Hillside, Illinois, and Mark Orenstein, Chicago, 
Illinois; to collectively acquire voting shares of OptimumBank 
Holdings, Inc., Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of OptimumBank, Plantation, Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 9, 
2012.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-3358 Filed 2-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 11, 2010 

s0603 

Order 

 

June 11, 2010 

140190 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140190 

 COA: 284824 

Ingham CC: 07-001144-FC 

TERRANCE DARNELL GAMBLE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 22, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2066/2005

of 16 December 2005         

fixing the minimum selling price for skimmed-milk powder for the 31st individual invitation to tender issued under the standing invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 214/2001

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10(c) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 31st individual invitation to tender pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 214/2001, in respect of which the time limit for the submission of tenders expired on 13 December 2005, the minimum selling price for skimmed milk is fixed at 185,50 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 December 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 37, 7.2.2001, p. 100. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

----
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No.333-55843 and 333-32252) and Form S-8 (No. 33-38831,
33-40506, 33-53052, 33-53158, 33-63603, 33-82524, 333-07089, 333-07101,
333-07103, 333-07095, 333-11787, 333-11795, 333-31213 and 333-31233, 333-47372,
333-60441, 333-60443, 333-60445, 333-92713 and 333-72530) pertaining to the
1984 Stock Option Plan, the 1989 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1994 Stock
Option Plan, the 1995 Directors Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Replacement Option
Plan, the 1998 Engineering Stock Incentive Plan, the 1999 Directors Stock
Option Plan, the 1999 Retention Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of Laserscope, of our report dated February 14, 2002 relating to
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule for the
year ended December 31, 2001, which appear in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
March 15, 2002
Exhibit 99.2

In  connection  with the CNB Florida  Bancshares,  Inc. (the  "Company")  Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December  31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  (the  "Report"),  I, G.
Thomas  Frankland,  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



    1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and


    2. The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                    /s/ G. Thomas Frankland
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    G. Thomas Frankland
                                                    Executive Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
Letter Agreement dated February 28, 2010



 Exhibit 10.58 

February 28, 2010 
 Matthew
J. Szulik 
 [address omitted] 
 Dear
Matthew: 
 This letter (the “Agreement”) sets forth the agreement between Red Hat, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), and you regarding the terms that shall govern your service as non-executive chairman (“Chairman”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company for the
twelve-month period beginning on March 1, 2010 through February 28, 2011 (the “Term”). 
 1. During
the Term, you will receive the cash and equity compensation provided for the Chairman under the Company’s Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan, amended and restated as of March 1, 2010 (the “Plan”), a copy of which is
attached to this Agreement as Appendix A. 
 2. As of the date of this Agreement, the Non-Executive Chairman Agreement, between
you and the Company, dated as of February 28, 2008 and as amended on December 29, 2008 (the “Chairman’s Agreement”) shall be terminated and shall be of no further force and effect; provided, however, that you and the
Company shall continue to be bound by the provisions of Sections 4.4 and 5.2 of the Chairman’s Agreement, and such provisions are incorporated by reference into this Agreement. 

3. Your uninterrupted and continued service as a member of the Board is intended to be treated as continued service with the Company for
purposes of vesting and (as applicable) exercisability of your outstanding Company equity incentive awards. 
 4. This agreement
may only be amended in a writing signed by both you and the Company. The respective rights and obligations of the Company and you under this Agreement shall terminate at the end of the Term, except for the rights and obligations under Paragraph 2 of
this Agreement which shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 
 5. Nothing in this Agreement shall interfere with or
limit in any way the right of the Company to terminate your service as Chairman or as a director in accordance with the Company’s governing documents and Delaware corporate law. During your service as Chairman, you will be subject to the same
terms, conditions and policies as those that apply to other non-employee members of the Board, except as provided for in this Agreement. 

6. This Agreement shall be construed, interpreted and governed in accordance with the laws of North Carolina without reference to rules
relating to conflict of laws. 
 Please confirm your acceptance of the terms of this Agreement by signing this Agreement in the
space provided below. 
  

			
	RED HAT, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Charles E. Peters, Jr.




Acknowledged and agreed: 
  

			
	 /s/ Matthew J. Szulik

	Matthew J. Szulik
	Date: February 28, 2010
EXHIBIT 18





April 17, 1998

CCAIR, Inc.
Post Office Box 19929
Charlotte, North Carolina  28219-0929




Gentlemen/Ladies:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a registrant's independent accounts whenever there has been a change
in accounting principle or practice.

As of July 1, 1997, the Company changed from the deferral method of accounting
for engine, propeller and landing gear overhauls to the accrual method.
According to the management of the Company, this change was made to more closely
emulate its lease agreements and contracts for repair and maintenance of these
components.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable alternative
principles has not been established by the accounting profession. Thus, we
cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in accounting
described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have
reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to financial reporting,
in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our opinion stated below is
based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to an
acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the reasons
stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also preferable under the
circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion, we have
relied on the business judgement and business planning of your management.

Very truly yours,

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer, in connection with the Quarterly Report of CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                                            
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 10, 2019


/s/ Mark Gatto


Mark Gatto


Co-Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


CĪON Investment Corporation
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.44 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, Defense Supply Center Richmond, workplace safety , Warfighter First, People and Culture

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 9969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3925]

[[Page 9969]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-80,463]

Clow Water Systems Company Including On-Site Leased Workers From 
Carol Harris Stafffing Including Workers Whose Unemployment Insurance 
(UI) Wages Are Reported Through McWane, Inc., Coshocton, OH; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on December 14, 2011, applicable to workers of Clow Water Systems 
Company, including on-site leased workers from Carol Harris Staffing, 
Coshocton, Ohio. The workers are engaged in activities related to the 
production of iron pipe and utility fittings. The notice was published 
in the Federal Register on December 29, 2011(76 FR 81988).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information shows 
that McWane, Inc. is the parent firm of Clow Water Systems Company. 
Some workers separated from employment at the Coshocton, Ohio location 
of Clow Water Systems Company had their wages reported through a 
separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account under the name McWane, 
Inc.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
include workers of the subject firm whose unemployment insurance (UI) 
wages are reported through McWane, Inc. The intent of the Department's 
certification is to include all workers of the subject firm who were 
adversely affected by increased imports of iron pipe and utility 
fittings.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-80,463 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Clow Water Systems Company, including on-site 
leased workers from Carol Harris Staffing, including workers whose 
unemployment insurance (UI) wages are reported through McWane, Inc., 
Coshocton, Ohio, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after September 23, 2010, through December 14, 
2013, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 
223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for 
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of February 2012.
 Michael W. Jaffe
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-3925 Filed 2-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 19

- 00078

- CV

IN RE HAMPTON ROADS LANDSCAPING & LAWN C ARE, LLC

AND MARK RYAN TAYLOR

Original Proceeding

M EMORANDUM OPINION

Relators’ Petition for Writ of Mandamus, filed on February 27, 2019, is denied. The

stay ordered by the Court on February 28, 2019 is lifted.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Stay lifted

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed April 24 , 2019

[OT06]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 98-10431

Summary Calendar

_____________________

OTIS C. TOLBERT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ROBERT VASQUEZ, in his official capacity at

Dallas Area Rapid Transit as Assistant

Executive Director of Administration, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:93-CV-1468-X)

_________________________________________________________________

November 12, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Otis C. Tolbert, pro se, appeals the summary judgment

dismissing his claims against the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART)

and its employees, officers, and board members, for racial

discrimination, denial of due process and equal protection, and

intentional infliction of emotional distress, arising out of his

demotion and discharge in 1990 from his position as Director of

Minority Affairs.
- 2 -

Based upon our de novo review of the record, we AFFIRM the

summary judgment essentially for the reasons stated by the district

court in its comprehensive opinion. See Tolbert v. Vasquez, No.

3:93-CV-1468-X (N.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 1998) (unpublished). Tolbert

has not shown an abuse of discretion (or plain error with regard to

those contentions raised for the first time on appeal) concerning

his claim that the summary judgment was obtained by

misrepresentation and fraud in connection with the extension of a

deadline.

Appellees’ request for attorneys’ fees and costs, on the

ground that Tolbert’s appeal is frivolous, is denied. Tolbert has

filed several actions concerning this matter; accordingly, he is

cautioned that sanctions may be imposed against him if he makes any

further attempts to relitigate his claims concerning his demotion

and discharge.

 AFFIRMED