alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.94 MB)

Tags:LRS, Air Force, Airman, fuels, 51st Fighter Wing

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 26, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00396

- CV

TEXAS ARMORING CORPORATION

, Appellant

v.

Tinyan OKUNBO

, Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court N o. 2013

- CI

- 18380 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The court reporter responsible for filing the portion of the reporter’s record relating to the May 1, 2018 hearing on the motion for new trial, Angeliz Rivera, filed a letter informing the court that the reporter’s record has not been filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the reporter’s record.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within thirty days from the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points raised in appellant’s b rief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________ Irene Rios , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of July, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement on Form S-3 (No. 333-55843 and 333-32252) and S-8 (No. 33-38831,33-40506, 33-53052, 33-53158, 33-63603, 33-82524, 333-07089, 333-07101,333-07103, 333-07095, 333-11787, 333-11795, 333-31213 and 333-31233, 333-47372,333-60441, 333-60443, 333-60445, 333-92713, 333-72530, 333-101212 and333-110492)pertaining to the 1984 Stock Option Plan, the 1989 Employee Stock PurchasePlan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the1995 Replacement Option Plan, the 1998 Engineering Stock Incentive Plan, the1999 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the 1999 Retention Stock Option Plan and the1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Laserscope of our report datedMarch 12,2004, relating tothe consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, whichappears in this Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 41 

Supporting the designation of March 2013, as National Colorectal Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2013 

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Mr. CARDIN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of March 2013, as National 

Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month. 

Whereas colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among men and women in the United States, 

killing more non-smokers than any other cancer; 

Whereas every year it is estimated that more than 135,000 

individuals in the United States are diagnosed with 

colorectal cancer and more than 50,000 individuals die 

from the disease; 

Whereas colorectal cancer is one of the most highly preventable forms of cancer because screening tests can find polyps that can be removed before becoming cancerous; 

Whereas screening tests can detect colorectal cancer early, 

when treatment works best; 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 41 ATS 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that if every individual aged 50 or older had regular screening tests, as many as 60 percent of deaths 

from colorectal cancer could be prevented; 

Whereas the 5-year survival rate for patients with localized 

colorectal cancer is 90 percent, but only 39 percent of all 

diagnoses occur at this stage; 

Whereas colorectal cancer screening can effectively reduce 

colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, yet 1 in 3 

adults between the ages of 50 and 75 are not up to date 

with recommended colorectal cancer screening; 

Whereas public awareness and education campaigns on 

colorectal cancer prevention, screening, and symptoms 

are held during the month of March each year; and 

Whereas educational efforts can help provide information to 

the public of methods of prevention and screening, as 

well as about symptoms for early detection: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the month with appropriate awareness 

6 and educational activities. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 394 

Designating April 5, 2014, as ‘‘Gold Star Wives Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 24, 2014 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mrs. MURRAY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

APRIL 3, 2014 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 5, 2014, as ‘‘Gold Star Wives Day’’. 

Whereas the Senate honors the sacrifices made by the 

spouses and families of the fallen members of the Armed 

Forces of the United States; 

Whereas Gold Star Wives of America, Inc. represents the 

spouses and families of the members and veterans of the 

Armed Forces of the United States who have died on active duty or as a result of a service-connected disability; 

Whereas the primary mission of Gold Star Wives of America, 

Inc. is to provide services, support, and friendship to the 

spouses of the fallen members and veterans of the Armed 

Forces of the United States; 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 394 ATS 

Whereas in 1945, Gold Star Wives of America, Inc. was organized with the help of Eleanor Roosevelt to assist the 

families left behind by the fallen members and veterans 

of the Armed Forces of the United States; 

Whereas the first meeting of Gold Star Wives of America, 

Inc. was held on April 5, 1945; 

Whereas April 5, 2014, marks the 69th anniversary of the 

first meeting of Gold Star Wives of America, Inc.; 

Whereas the members and veterans of the Armed Forces of 

the United States bear the burden of protecting the freedom of the people of the United States; and 

Whereas the sacrifices of the families of the fallen members 

and veterans of the Armed Forces of the United States 

should never be forgotten: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 5, 2014, as ‘‘Gold Star 

3 Wives Day’’; 

4 (2) honors and recognizes— 

5 (A) the contributions of the members of 

6 Gold Star Wives of America, Inc.; and 

7 (B) the dedication of the members of Gold 

8 Star Wives of America, Inc. to the members 

9 and veterans of the Armed Forces of the United 

10 States; and 

11 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

12 to observe Gold Star Wives Day to promote aware13 ness of— 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 394 ATS 

1 (A) the contributions and dedication of the 

2 members of Gold Star Wives of America, Inc. 

3 to the members and veterans of the Armed 

4 Forces of the United States; and 

5 (B) the important role that Gold Star 

6 Wives of America, Inc. plays in the lives of the 

7 spouses and families of the fallen members and 

8 veterans of the Armed Forces of the United 

9 States. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 50195 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **James Alexander Winstead,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:21

- CR

- 231

- 2

**_____________ _________________**  Before **Jolly, Jones,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
The attorney appointed to represent James Alexander Winstead has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Winstead has filed a response. To the extent that Winstead attempts to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, t he record is not

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 28, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-50195 Document: 00516691952 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2023No. 22

- 50195

2 sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Winstead’ s claim ; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Winstead ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Acc ordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

. 42.2. Case: 22-50195 Document: 00516691952 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/28/2023
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Redpoint BioCorporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, F. Raymond Salemme, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 7, 2008 |   | /s/ F. Raymond Salemme                 |
|------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                         |   | F. Raymond  Salemme                    |
|                         |   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |   | (Principal  Executive Officer)         |

 

----

*                          A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Redpoint Bio Corporationand will be retained by Redpoint Bio Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-23-00158-CR 

 

DOUGLAS RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 390th District Court 

Travis County, Texas 

Trial Court No. D-1-DC-21-302504, Honorable Julie H. Kocurek, Presiding 

May 23, 2023 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. 

Appellant, Douglas Rodriguez, appeals his conviction for aggravated assault with 

a deadly weapon1 and sentence to six years confinement.

2 Pending before this Court is 

Appellant’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. As required by Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.2(a), the motion to dismiss is signed by Appellant and his attorney. As no 

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(a)(2).

2 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the 

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
2

decision of the Court has been delivered, the motion is granted and the appeal is 

dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue 

forthwith.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
No. 99-20527 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20527 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MAE JUNE HICKS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-195-1

- - - - - - - - - - May 2, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mae June Hicks appeals her jury convictions for conspiracy to commit money laundering, mail fraud, and wire fraud. The record is not adequately developed in this direct criminal appeal for this court to review Hicks’ ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Accordingly, we decline to consider this claim without prejudice to Hicks’ right to raise the claim in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See United States v. Rivas , 157 F.3d 364, 369 (5th Cir. 1998). We discern no plain error in the district court’s failure to order sua sponte the production of a summaryNo. 99-20527 -2- report prepared by an unidentified federal agent who had interviewed Hicks’ coconspirator. The district court did not abuse its discretion in its handling of Hicks’ cross-examination of her coconspirator. See United States v. Alexius , 76 F.3d 642, 644 (5th Cir. 1996). Finally, the prosecutor’s comments during closing do not cast serious doubt on the correctness of the jury’s verdict in light of the overwhelming evidence of Hicks’ guilt and the court’s curative instruction to the jury. See United States v. Morrow , 177 F.3d 272, 299 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 120 S. Ct. 333, 514, 600 (1999), and 120 S. Ct. 814 (2000). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jerome Griffith, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Tumi Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 25, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tumi Holdings, Inc.

Date: May 23, 2012



By:

/s/ Jerome GriffithName:

Jerome GriffithTitle:

Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-51116

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE JIMENEZ-VARGAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-01-CR-146-ALL-SS 

--------------------

June 19, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Jimenez-Vargas appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends

that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the two-year

maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). 

Jimenez-Vargas complains that his sentence was improperly

enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his prior

deportation following an aggravated felony conviction. He argues

that the sentencing provision violates the Due Process Clause. 
No. 01-51116 

-2-

Alternatively, Jimenez-Vargas contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)

and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues

that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his

increased sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Jimenez-Vargas acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court

must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court

itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit 31.7





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TORULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Henry Ji, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 3 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: June 26, 2017 | By: |  | /s/ Henry Ji                         
|------------------- | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|                    |     |  | Henry Ji                             
|                    |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                    |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Indian River State Bank, Plaintiff in Error, v. Liverpool and London and Globe Insurance Company, Defendant in Error.

(No. 1.)

Division A.

Writ of error to Circuit Court, Brevard county; Rhydon M. Call, Judge.

Robbins & Graham and Geo. P. Raney for plaintiff in error.

A. W. Cockrell & Son for defendant in error.

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error. There was judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff takes writ of error. Judgment reversed on the authority of Indian River State Bank v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, *ante,*p. 283.

Decision *Per Curiam.*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael Gilligan, Principal Financial Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of
PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2009 |  | /s/ Michael Gilligan       
|                  |  | Michael Gilligan           
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer



E-5