alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2.74 MB)

Tags:176th Maintenance Squadron, 3rd Maintenance Squadron, JBER, C-17, HSC

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.36



                      EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH ALOK MOHAN

The following summarizes the agreement between SCO and Alok Mohan effective with
the appointment of a new President & CEO.

Effective with the appointment of a new President & CEO for SCO, Alok shall
become an advisor to the Company. The term of this agreement will be for one
year, and the board shall give him notice not later than 90 days prior to the
expiration of the term of the agreement, of their intention as to renewal for an
additional year. He shall remain as an employee while serving as an advisor and
shall be entitled to the same benefits as enjoyed by other officers of SCO. As
an advisor while remaining as an employee of the Company, Alok shall be
compensated as follows:

        o       Term of this agreement shall be for one year commencing on the
                date the newly elected CEO takes office. Such agreement may be
                extended beyond this one year term at the request of the CEO and
                acceptability of the Board.

        o       Base Salary to be $200,000 per year with an annual bonus
                opportunity of $152,000 at target. His bonus shall be based on
                the Corporate Incentive Plan for Fiscal Year 1998 and any
                subsequent years.

        o       Alok shall be expected to give SCO in his new role as an
                advisor, between 25% and 50% of his available work time during
                the term of this agreement.

        o       He will continue to vest in the stock options he has been
                granted during the term of his tenure as an advisor to the
                Company.

        o       This agreement shall cover customary travel and entertainment
                normally accorded to someone in this position, including travel
                between Dayton and Santa Cruz.

        o       His focus in this role will be:

                o       Assist in the transition of General Management
                        responsibilities to the new CEO.

                o       Provide ongoing advice and counsel, as requested and
                        needed by the new CEO.

                o       Assist the CEO with Board matters and other issues of
                        importance to the Corporation.

                o       Identify and develop potential incubators which are
                        critical to and capable of providing a "third pillar"
                        for SCO's product strategy.

                o       Assist SCO management in identifying and working with
                        potential acquisitions.

It has been suggested by Alok, and that suggestion is supported by Doug as the
new CEO, that he serve as Chairman of the Board. If he is so elected, such
election does not alter the terms and conditions of this agreement and no
additional compensation shall be provided.
Order entered December 6, 2021 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00532-CV 

IN RE STEFANIE HENDERSON, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 256th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-20-05757 

ORDER 

Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Smith 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for 

writ of mandamus, and DENY relator’s emergency motion for stay as moot. 

/s/ CRAIG SMITH 

 JUSTICE
#### Samuel S. Lamb, Sr., *et al.,*Appellants, v. The County of Manatee *et al.,*Appellees.

Division A.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Manatee county; J. B. Wall, Judge.

Langley & Singeltary for appellants.

*631C. C. Whitaker for appellees.

The bill in this cause was filed by the appellants against the appellees. There was decree for the defendants, and the complainants appeal. The decree is affirmed.

Decision *Per Curiam.*
---

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. §1350,                             
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of NovaCopper Inc. (the Registrant) for the period ended
February 28, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: | April 9, 2013                               | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------- | 
|      |                                             | 
|By:   | /s/ Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse                   | 
|      | Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse                       | 
|      | President and Chief Executive
      Officer | 
|      | (principal executive
      officer)         | 

---
[491Q-I3-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION tlNC!.'RllENCf.$ WUTING ~Y"'OOL Federal Aviation Administration
~ 14 CFR Part 39 .

# RaJ",~ (Docket No. FAA-2009-0615; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-043-AD; Amendmen 

# !l!~::LDq \Lo;'CJ<p 

## '2.010-0L

# H3 il/P-k 39-*****; AD 

###  -** -**1 

# r'Sl RIN 2120-AA64 m 

## I 12--/

### t-::r Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310-203, -221, -222 Airplanes and Model A300 F4-605R and -622R Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the products list

## AJjJ..-f 

# T~

m

## 1((1~J UTINGSVldllOl

ETI"" S"'MBOL 

### Ii 

## 0 OtW:;SY l 

### AivA'(\;1J 

# ABJt7J'11! ATf. 

# ?JIll 0 An unwanted movement ofpilot or co-pilot seat inthe aft direction is considered as potentially dangerous, especially during the take-off phase when the speed ofthe aeroplane is greater than 100knots and untillanding gear retraction. An A300-600 operator reported two events of !PECO pilot seat moved in the aft position, one during take-off roll and one during climb out. The investigation ofthese events showed that abroken/missing spring contributed to the seat not being correctly locked. condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct an unsafe 

## AIJf'-\lf above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)



## * * * * 

## * * * The unsafe condition ispotential loss ofcontrol ofthe airplane during take-off and
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.72 MB)

Tags:Naval Facilities Engineering Command Hawaii, Loglines, January 2019, fuel oil reclaimed

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### Hartman, Appellee, *v.*McMahill et al., Appellees; Hartman, Appellant.

(No. 30960

Decided February 26, 1947.)

*537
      *Mr. G. L. Schilling*and *Mr. Clinton H. Nichols,*for appellee Martha J. Hartman.

*Mr. C. Luther Swaim,*for appellees’ Rhea Hartman, trustee, and Walter Hartman.

*Mr. George S. Hawke,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged, *sua sponte,*that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Zimmerman, Bell and Sohngen, JJ., concur.

Hart, J., not participating.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6779

BOBBY GRADY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (CA-03-972-5-FL)

Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 20, 2004

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby Grady, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Bobby Grady, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Grady has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny

Grady’s motion for damages, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                        COMMUNITY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Year Ended December 31,
                                                      ---------------------------------------------------
                                                         1999                1998                1997
                                                      ---------           ----------          -----------
<S>                                                   <C>                 <C>                 <C>
Income Per Common Share
-----------------------
         Basic (1)
         -----
Net income (in thousands)                             $    3,501          $    2,581          $     2,058
                                                      ==========           =========           ==========

Net income per share                                  $      .86          $     1.08          $       .93
                                                      ----------          ----------           ----------

Weighted average common
  shares outstanding                                   4,067,522           2,393,576            2,205,043
                                                      ==========          ==========           ==========

Income Per Common Share,
------------------------
         Diluted (2)
         -------
Net income (in thousands)                             $    3,501          $    2,581          $     2,058
                                                      ==========          ==========          ===========

Net income per share                                  $      .85          $      .78          $       .89
                                                      ==========          ==========          ===========

Weighted average common share
  Outstanding                                          4,129,069           3,321,228            2,323,580
                                                      ==========          ==========          ===========
</TABLE>

(1)      Basic net income per share has been computed using the weighted
         average number of common shares outstanding during each year
         presented. See Note L to the Company's consolidated financial
         statements included in the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year
         ended December 31, 1999 incorporated herein by reference.

(2)      Diluted net income per share has been computed using the weighted
         average number of common shares outstanding and the dilutive effect of
         stock options and warrants outstanding during the years presented. See
         Note L to the Company's consolidated financial statements included in
         the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 1999
         incorporated herein by reference.




                                     -102-
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS*

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of
Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Terry R. McCormack                           
|Terry R. McCormack                               
|President and Chief Executive Officer            
|November 13, 2008                                
|                                                 
|/s/ Thomas H. Madden                             
|Thomas H. Madden                                 
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 13, 2008                                



|* | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



39
OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Casey Gadbury, Director 

Office of the Nationai TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Gadbury: 

We received your letter dated May 29, 2008, requesting the Environmental Protection 

Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the revised dra$ recertification letter you plan to issue to the 

Central Characterization Projeet (CCP) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). Your request is 

in accordance with the Carlsbad Field Offtce (CBFO) procedures that are intended to ensure that 

the Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site certifications 

correlate appropriately with BPA approvals for waste characterization activities at DOE 

transuranic (TRU) waste generator sites. 

On November 2, 2005 and January 12, 2007. EPA respectively, approved CCP's TRU 

waste characterization program for eharacterizing contact-handled (CH) waste and remotehandled (RH) waste prior to its disposal at the Waste Isolation Plant. 1'he inspection reports are 

available in the EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49; Item II-A4-59 and Item II-A4-72. EPA has also 

received and reviewed tiering reports covering the waste characterization program implemented 

by CCP at INL and have found all ehanges made to be acceptable. 

EPA concurs that the waste characterization equipment, proeedures and waste streams 

eneornpassed in DOE's dra$ recertification letter comport with all of EPA's existing approvals 

for CH and RH waste at INL-CCP. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft recertification letter 

for llvrL-CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343- 

9422 or Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462. 

SincerelvTom Peake, Aeting Direetor 

Center for Federal Regulations 

;nternetAddress(URL) ® iritp://ww.epa.gev 

RecyelerfiRecyc4ab3e e Prtnted wlih Vegeta6le Oil 8ased Inks on 1 QO % Postconsumer, Process Chiorine Free Recycietl Paper 
cc: Electronic Distribution 

Ava Holland, CBFO 

Vernon Daub, CBFO 

Courtland Fesmire, CBFO 

J. R. Stroble, CBFO 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO 

Dennis Miehls_ CBFO 

Allison Pangle, CTAC 

Wayne Ledford, CTAC 

Steve Zappe, NMED
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 67 

Designating April 5, 2013, as ‘‘Gold Star Wives Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2013 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mr. SANDERS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 5, 2013, as ‘‘Gold Star Wives Day’’. 

Whereas the Senate honors the sacrifices made by the 

spouses and families of the fallen members of the Armed 

Forces of the United States; 

Whereas Gold Star Wives of America, Inc. represents the 

spouses and families of the members and veterans of the 

Armed Forces of the United States who have died on active duty or as a result of a service-connected disability; 

Whereas the primary mission of Gold Star Wives of America, 

Inc. is to provide services, support, and friendship to the 

spouses of the fallen members and veterans of the Armed 

Forces of the United States; 

Whereas, in 1945, Gold Star Wives of America, Inc. was organized with the help of Eleanor Roosevelt to assist the 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 67 IS 

families left behind by the fallen members and veterans 

of the Armed Forces of the United States; 

Whereas the first meeting of Gold Star Wives of America, 

Inc. was held on April 5, 1945; 

Whereas April 5, 2013, marks the 68th anniversary of the 

first meeting of Gold Star Wives of America, Inc.; 

Whereas the members and veterans of the Armed Forces of 

the United States bear the burden of protecting the freedom of the people of the United States; and 

Whereas the sacrifices of the families of the fallen members 

and veterans of the Armed Forces of the United States 

should never be forgotten: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 5, 2013, as ‘‘Gold Star 

3 Wives Day’’; 

4 (2) honors and recognizes— 

5 (A) the contributions of the members of 

6 Gold Star Wives of America, Inc.; and 

7 (B) the dedication of the members of Gold 

8 Star Wives of America, Inc. to the members 

9 and veterans of the Armed Forces of the United 

10 States; and 

11 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

12 to observe Gold Star Wives Day to promote aware13 ness of— 

14 (A) the contributions and dedication of the 

15 members of Gold Star Wives of America, Inc. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 67 IS 

1 to the members and veterans of the Armed 

2 Forces of the United States; and 

3 (B) the important role Gold Star Wives of 

4 America, Inc. plays in the lives of the spouses 

5 and families of the fallen members and veterans 

6 of the Armed Forces of the United States. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS