alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### George Alford, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.

Writ of error to Criminal Court of Record, Escambia county; E. D. Beggs, Judge.

C. M. Jones and Chas. M. Coston for plaintiff in error.

Attorney-General for the State.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant takes writ of error. Writ of error dismissed by the clerk on praecipe of counsel for the plaintiff in error, under Rule 24.
Exhibit 10(a)



 EXHIBIT (10)(a) 

Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional
Information, and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 9, 2010, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, and (2) dated April 29, 2010, with
respect to the financial statements of the subaccounts of TFLIC Separate Account VNY, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-122235) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related
Prospectus of the Advisor’s Edge NY Variable Annuity. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Des Moines, Iowa 
 April 29, 2010
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Redpoint Bio Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Scott M. Horvitz, Chief Financial and Operating Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   May 16, 2011 |   | /s/   Scott M. Horvitz                                                    |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Scott   M. Horvitz                                                        |
|                       |   | Chief Financial and Operating Officer   and Treasurer |
|                       |   | (Principal   Financial and Accounting Officer)                            |

 

----

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Redpoint Bio Corporation and will be retained by Redpoint Bio Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Abatement Order filed November 3, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00901-CR

____________

JESUS GONZALEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 184th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1351489

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant appealed from a conviction for the offense of aggravated sexual 

assault. On October 30, 2015, the trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record, which 

contains a certification of appellant’s right to appeal his original guilty plea, but 

does not contain a certification of appellant’s right to appeal on the adjudication. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 34.5(a)(12); see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 

610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (“The court of appeals must dismiss an appeal if 

a certification showing that the defendant has the right to appeal is not made a part 
of the appellate record.”). We therefore abate the case and order the trial court to 

execute a certification of appellant’s right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

34.5(c)(2), 37.1, 44.4; Cortez v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803, 806–07 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2013).

An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant 

has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. Tex. R. App. P. 

25.2(d); Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 613. In connection with this record, pursuant to Tex. 

R. App. P. 37.1 and 44.4, we abate this appeal and direct the trial court to file a

certification of the defendant’s right of appeal with the trial court clerk and direct 

the clerk to prepare and file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the corrected 

certification with this court within 30 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 416 

Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber of the United States 

Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7, 2014 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber 

of the United States Senate. 

1 Resolved, That paragraph 1 of Rule IV of the Rules 

2 for the Regulation of the Senate Wing of the United 

3 States Capitol (prohibiting the taking of pictures in the 

4 Senate Chamber) be temporarily suspended for the sole 

5 and specific purpose of permitting the Senate Photo6 graphic Studio to photograph the United States Senate 

7 in actual session on Tuesday, May 6, 2014, at the hour 

8 of 2:15 p.m. 

9 SEC. 2. The Sergeant at Arms of the Senate is au10 thorized and directed to make the necessary arrangements 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 416 ATS 

1 therefore, which arrangements shall provide for a min2 imum of disruption to Senate proceedings. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.49 MB)

Tags:Air Forces Central Command, 455th Expeditionary Logistics Readiness Squadron, U.S. AFCENT, U.S. Air Force, pilot, aircraft, 455th Air Expeditionary Wing, Bagram Airfield, Bagram, team, Air Force, Afghanistan, usaf, airmen, vehicle maintenance, aerial port, vehicles, fuels, fuels, contractors, aircrew, Operation Freedom’s Sentinel, supply, contingency operations, passenger terminal, NATO Resolute Support, transportation management

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-85,408-01

EX PARTE PEDRO VALENTIN-ESCOBAR, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. F-2014-1145-A WHC-1 IN THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM DENTON COUNTY

PER CURIAM. ALCALA, J., filed a concurring opinion in which JOHNSON, J.,

joined.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of engaging in

organized criminal activity and sentenced to seventeen years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his

conviction. 

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because counsel advised Applicant

incorrectly as to his parole eligibility. Ex parte Moussazadeh, 361 S.W.3d 684, 691–92 (Tex. Crim.
2

App. 2012); TEX. GOV’T. CODE § 508.145(d)(1). Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might

entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte

Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for

findings of fact. The trial court shall provide Applicant’s trial counsel with the opportunity to

respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel and involuntary plea. The trial

court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). 

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant’s

claim that his plea was involuntary. The trial court shall make specific findings as to whether counsel

told Applicant that he would be eligible for parole in two years, despite a conviction for an offense

that is not eligible for parole until time served equals one-half the sentence. If the court finds

counsel erred, it shall make specific findings as to whether there is a reasonable probability that, but

for counsel’s errors, Applicant would have insisted on a trial. The trial court shall also make any

other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition

of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact

issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript

containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any

hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of

law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of
3

time must be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: October 5, 2016

Do not publish
##### 



Exhibit 32.2*
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   /s/ Richard A. MorinRichard A. MorinSenior Vice President of Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
(principal financial officer) 
 *
    
    This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2.65 MB)

Tags:DSCC, EMS Week, Dylan Garrett

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-18-00772- CV

In re Madele ine Connor

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Relator Madele ine Connor has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s order sever ing her claims ag ainst cer tain defe ndants afte r those claims wer e dismiss ed pursua

nt to the Texas Ci tiz ens Participation Ac t. See Tex. R. App. P . 52. 1 Mandamus relief may be appropr iate if a trial court improperly sever s claims into a separ ate case . See, e.g. , In re State , 355 S.W .3d 611, 614-15 (Tex. 2011) (whe n sever ance into eig ht

2 separ ate suits was improper, State lacke d adequate reme dy by appea l beca use of “enormous waste of judicial and public resour ces” ); In re City of Austin Police Dep’ t , No. 03-98 -00661-CV, 1999 WL 11224, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin J an. 14, 1999, o ri g . proce eding ) (per curia m) (not desig nated f

or publication) ( Texas courts have a poli cy ag ainst “piec emea l trials,” and manda mus relief “is appropr iate when the trial court im p ro perly sever s a single cause of action”)
. Howeve r,

See Tex. Ci v. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 27.001-.011. 1 See In re State , 3 5 5 S
. W
. 3d 611, 614 (Tex. 2011) (seve ranc e is proper if controve rsy 2 involves multipl e cause s of action, sever ed claim could be inde pendently asser ted, and sever ed claim is not so int erw oven with re maining c laim that they involve same fa cts and issues).Connor’s claims ag ainst the rea l parties in interest have been dismiss ed and thus can no long er be

considere d interwove n with her remaining claims. Fur ther, Connor ha s expl ained that she wishes to c halleng e the dismiss al of her c laims ag ainst the rea l parties in intere st, a nd the sever ance order rende red those dismiss als final and appea lable. See, e.g. , Martinez v. Humble Sand & Grave l, Inc. , 875 S.W .2d 311, 313 (Tex
. 1 9 94). Thus, Connor has an adequate reme dy by appea l. See In re Rogers , No. 09-11-00644- CV, 2012 WL 112553, at *1 (Tex. App.—B eaumont J an. 12, 2012, orig
. proce eding ) (mem. op.) (“A s to the sever ed cause , appea l is available an d will be an adequate
reme dy .”); In re Fantroy , No. 10-09-00008- CV, 2009 WL 91712, at *1-2 (Tex
. Ap p.—Waco J an. 9, 2 0 0 9 , o rig
. proce eding ) (mem. op.) (“be cause he has an adequate reme dy by appea l of the judgme nt and sever ance order , Fa ntroy ’s petition for writ of mandamus is de nied”) ; In re Clayton , No. 09-05-00412- CV, 2006 WL 1045175, at *2 (Tex. App.—B eaumont Apr. 20 , 2 0 0 6 , o ri g . proce eding (mem. op.) (once sever ance signe d, interlocutory order s wer e appea lable). We deny the petition for writ of manda mus. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8(a)
.

__________________________________________ Cindy Olson Bour land, J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and B ourland Filed: De cembe r 13, 2018

2
October 16, 2015

Mr. Dill

1028 Broadway Avenue

New Johnsonville, TN 37134

Dear Mr. Dill:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your July 23, 2015, exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−3115, but 

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.
2

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended July 31, 2014 of Gawk, Inc. (“the Company”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer
of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his respective knowledge:



|1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



|Date:
    January 5, 2015 | /s/
    Scott Kettle                                                                                                                          
|------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          | Scott
    Kettle                                                                                                                              
|                          | Chairman,
                                         Chief Executive Officer, and 
Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal
Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof SSTL, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q, for the period ended August 6, 2012 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, I, Jason White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.

 

 

Date:  August 6, 2012

 

   /s/  Jason White                                                      

Name:  Jason White

Its:  Chief Executive Officer (Principal ExecutiveOfficer)
#### Indian River State Bank, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. The Providence Washington Insurance Company, *Defendant in Error.*

This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Brevard county.

*Geo. M. Robbins*and *Geo. P. Raney*for plaintiff in error.

*A. 'W. Cockrell & Son*for defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

The above stated cause coming on for final disposition before Division A of the court upon the transcript of record and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, after due consideration the court finds that the case made in the transcript of record is substantially the same in all material particulars as that of the Indian *347River State Bank as plaintiff in error against the Hartford Fire Insurance Company, as defendant in error decided by written opinion by Division A of the court at the present term, in which substantially the same questions were presented as are involved in the present case, and that what is said in that case is fully decisive of the questions presented in this case. It is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby reversed with directions to overrule the demurrer of the defendant insurance company to the last amended declaration of the plaintiff below, the Indian River State Bank, and to sustain the demurrer of the said plaintiff to the pleas of the defendant in all such particulars wherein such pleas may be inconsistent with the views expressed in the said opinion of this court in the said case of the *Indian River State Bank v. The Hartford Fire Insurance Company*herein above referred to, and for such further proceedings as shall be consonant with law. The costs of this appellate proceeding to be taxed against the defendant in error.