1950 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2012 / Notices 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Agency: Employment and Training 

Administration. 

Title of Collection: Trade Adjustment 

Assistance Community College and 

Career Training Grant Program 

Reporting Requirements. 

OMB ICR Reference Number: 201110– 

1205–003. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

Households and Private Sector—NotFor-Profit Institutions. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Respondents: 168,247. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Responses: 336,644. 

Total Estimated Annual Burden 

Hours: 23,620. 

Total Estimated Annual Other Costs 

Burden: $0. 

Dated: January 5, 2012. 

Michel Smyth, 

Departmental Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2012–449 Filed 1–11–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of December 19, 2011 

through December 30, 2011. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

Following Must Be Satisfied 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) All of the 

Following Must Be Satisfied 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2012 / Notices 1951 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 1- 

year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) The 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1-year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

80,405 ............... Schweizer Aircraft Corporation, Sikorsky Aircraft, dba Sikorsky 

Military Completion, Adecco, Aerotek, etc.

Horseheads, NY ......................... August 30, 2010. 

80,413 ............... Flextronics, Flextronics International, Global Services Division, 

Aerotek.

Louisville, KY .............................. December 9, 2011. 

80,425 ............... Portage Mold and Die Co ............................................................... Ravenna, OH .............................. September 8, 2010. 

80,483 ............... American Apparel, Inc ..................................................................... Garden Grove, CA ..................... September 29, 2010. 

80,493 ............... Molded Fiber Glass Companies Texas, Class 8 Truck Roof Division.Gainesville, TX ........................... October 4, 2010. 

81,004 ............... Pace American Enterprises, Inc ...................................................... McGregor, TX ............................. February 13, 2010. 

81,004A ............ Pace American Enterprises, Inc ...................................................... Middlebury, IN ............................ February 13, 2010. 

81,004B ............ Pace American Enterprises, Inc ...................................................... Fitzgerald, GA ............................ February 13, 2010. 

81,004C ............ Pace American Enterprises, Inc ...................................................... Lebanon, OR .............................. February 13, 2010. 

81,004D ............ Pace American Enterprises, Inc ...................................................... Hurricane, UT ............................. February 13, 2010. 

81,009 ............... Birds Eye Foods, LLC, Fulton, NY Plant, Pinnacle Foods Group 

LLC, W L Staff Svces., Inc.

Fulton, NY .................................. February 13, 2010. 

81,010 ............... Velsicol Chemical LLC .................................................................... Memphis, TN .............................. February 13, 2010. 

81,050 ............... Fenton Gift Shops, Inc .................................................................... Williamstown, WV ....................... February 13, 2010. 

81,050A ............ Fenton Gift Shops, Inc .................................................................... Sutton, WV ................................. February 13, 2010. 

81,087 ............... Burlington Basket Company ............................................................ West Burlington, IA .................... February 13, 2010. 

81,115 ............... The Rupp Forge Company ............................................................. Cleveland, OH ............................ February 13, 2010. 

81,131 ............... Topsail Coast Enterprises, Inc ........................................................ Surf City, NC .............................. February 13, 2010. 

81,136 ............... Michelin North America, Inc., BF Goodrich Tire Manufacturing Division.Opelika, AL ................................. June 26, 2010. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

80,409 ............... Bosch Security Systems, Inc., Robert Bosch N.A .......................... Lancaster, PA ............................. February 13, 2010. 

80,523 ............... Siemens Water Technologies, Spherion Corporation ..................... Vineland, NJ ............................... October 14, 2010. 

81,007 ............... A. Schulman, On-Site Leased Workers From Manpower .............. Nashville, TN .............................. February 13, 2010. 

81,036 ............... Fair-Rite Products Corp .................................................................. Flat Rock, IL ............................... February 13, 2010. 

81,036A ............ Fair-Rite Products Corp .................................................................. Wallkill, NY ................................. February 13, 2010. 

81,037 ............... Emerson Power Transmission, On-Site Leased Workers from 

Nesco Services.

Maysville, KY .............................. February 13, 2010. 

81,037A ............ Emerson Power Transmission, On-Site Leased Workers from 

Nesco Services.

Maysville, KY .............................. February 13, 2010. 

81,043 ............... Outcomes Health Information Solutions, LLC ................................. Albuquerque, NM ....................... February 13, 2010. 

81,052 ............... Mohawk Fine Paper, Beckett Mill Division, Prestige Technical 

Services.

Hamilton, OH .............................. February 13, 2010. 

81,074 ............... Radia Inc., P.S., Business Services Division .................................. Everett, WA ................................ February 13, 2010. 

81,100 ............... Checkpoint Caribbean, Ltd., Checkpoint Systems, Personnel Recruiting Services.Ponce, PR .................................. February 13, 2010. 

81,107 ............... New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. (NUMMI), Joint Venture of 

General Motors Corporation & Toyota Motor Corporation.

Freemont, CA ............................. November 20, 2011. 

81,110 ............... Meggitt Aircraft Braking Systems Corporation, Meggitt PLC .......... Akron, OH ................................... February 13, 2010. 

81,110A ............ Kelly Services, Working On-Site Meggitt Aircraft Braking Systems 

Corporation.

Akron, OH ................................... February 13, 2010. 

81,119 ............... Federal-Mogul, Wiper Products Division ......................................... Michigan City, IN ........................ January 23, 2012. 

81,119A ............ Express Employment Working On-Site at Federal-Mogul .............. Michigan City, IN ........................ February 13, 2010. 

81,142 ............... Jeunique International, Inc .............................................................. Santa Fe Springs, CA ................ February 13, 2010. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1952 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2012 / Notices 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

81,160 ............... Kardex Production USA, Inc., Kardex AG ...................................... Lewistown, PA ............................ February 13, 2010. 

81,163 ............... Smith Jones, Inc., D.B.A. Midwest Manufacturing Company ......... Stanberry, MO ............................ February 13, 2011. 

81,164 ............... BAE Systems Controls, Inc., Electronic Systems Division ............. Irving, TX .................................... December 8, 2011. 

81,165 ............... Cengage Learning, Manufacturing Buyers’ Department, Adecco, 

Ajilon and Brooksource.

Mason, OH ................................. February 13, 2010. 

81,165A ............ Cengage Learning, Manufacturing Buyers’ Department ................. Belmont, CA ............................... February 13, 2010. 

81,169 ............... Ikano Communications, Inc. DBA DSL Extreme, Customer Service Department.Chatsworth, CA .......................... February 13, 2010. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

81,016 ............... Smart Papers Holdings LLC, Plainfield Paper Holdings LLC ......... Hamilton, OH .............................. February 13, 2010. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or 

(b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or 

threat of separation) of section 222 has 

not been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

80,529 ............... Wheatland Tube Company ............................................................. Sharon, PA. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) 

(decline in sales or production, or both) 

and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services to a foreign country) of section 

222 have not been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

80,421 ............... Geiger International, A Subsidiary of Herman Miller ...................... Lake Mills, WI. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

80,414 ............... Equistar Chemicals, LP, A Subsidiary of Lyondell Chemical Co Cincinnati, OH. 

80,446 ............... GoldToeMoretz, LLC, A Subsidiary of GTB Holding LLC .............. Newton, NC. 

80,493A ............ Molded Fiber Glass Companies Texas, Wind Turbine Blade Division.Gainesville, TX. 

80,512 ............... Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation ............................................................. Dallas, TX 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of December 19, 2011 through December 30, 

2011. These determinations are available on 

the Department’s Web site at tradeact/taa/taa 

search form.cfm under the searchable listing 

of determinations or by calling the Office of 

Trade Adjustment Assistance toll-free at 

(888) 365–6822. 

Dated: January 5, 2012. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2012–436 Filed 1–11–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Investigations Regarding Certifications 

of Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

Petitions have been filed with the 

Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and 

are identified in the Appendix to this 

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, 

the Director of the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, Employment 

and Training Administration, has 

instituted investigations pursuant to 

Section 221(a) of the Act. 

The purpose of each of the 

investigations is to determine whether 

the workers are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Title II, 

Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations 

will further relate, as appropriate, to the 

determination of the date on which total 

or partial separations began or 

threatened to begin and the subdivision 

of the firm involved. 

The petitioners or any other persons 

showing a substantial interest in the 

subject matter of the investigations may 

request a public hearing, provided such 

request is filed in writing with the 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES