alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,156,227
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         104,683
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,875,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,440,662
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         949,109
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           911,125
<LOANS>                                     49,394,455
<ALLOWANCE>                                    295,457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,925,368
<DEPOSITS>                                  42,180,698
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            229,125
<LONG-TERM>                                 11,440,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       231,439
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,844,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              58,925,368
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,155,451
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              258,042
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               175,153
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,588,646
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,909,686
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,436,580
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,152,066
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   87,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               6,748
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,913,379
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                386,708
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   242,775
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.07
<LOANS-NON>                                    145,466
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               221,356
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   20,810
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,911
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              295,457
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           295,457
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                         THE SANTA CRUZ OPERATION, INC.
         STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET PROFIT (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                ----------------------------------------------------
                                                                    1996                1995                1994
                                                                ------------        ------------        ------------

<S>                                                             <C>                 <C>                 <C>         
Net profit (loss)                                               $(22,414,000)       $ (6,108,000)       $ 14,246,000
                                                                ============        ============        ============

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding              36,179,050          30,921,705          30,170,963

Number of common equivalents as a result of stock options
     outstanding using the treasury stock method                          --                  --           1,769,573

                                                                ------------        ------------        ------------
          Total                                                   36,179,050          30,921,705          31,940,536
                                                                ------------        ------------        ------------

Primary net profit (loss) per share                             $      (0.62)       $      (0.20)       $       0.45
                                                                ============        ============        ============
</TABLE>
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 422 

To authorize written testimony, document production, and representation in 

Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Foundation, Inc. v. United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 10, 2014 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize written testimony, document production, and 

representation in Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks 

Foundation, Inc. v. United States. 

Whereas, in the case of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks 

Foundation, Inc. v. United States, No. 09–568 C, pending 

in the United States Court of Federal Claims, the plaintiff has issued a subpoena for testimony and production 

of documents from Holly Luck, a former employee of 

Senator Baucus; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current and former employees of the Senate with 

respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony 

relating to their official responsibilities; 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 422 ATS 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Holly Luck is authorized to provide 

2 written testimony and produce documents in the case of 

3 Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Foundation, Inc. v. 

4 United States, except concerning matters for which a privi5 lege should be asserted. 

6 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

7 represent Holly Luck in connection with the written testi8 mony and document production authorized by section 1 

9 of this resolution. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### J. W. Perry *et al.,*Plaintiffs in Error, v. Florida V. Bush, Defendant in Error.

Division A.

Writ of error to Circuit Court, Columbia county; John F. White, Judge.

T. B. Oliver for plaintiff in error.

*634B. H. Palmer for defendant in error.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendants take writ of error. The judgment is affirmed.

Decision *Per Curiam.*
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41129

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

KATHERINE RENEE POE, aka KATHERINE RENEE SHATTO, KATHERINE RENEE JOHNSON, KATHRINE RENEE POE, RENEE POE,

RENEE JOHNSON

,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 398

Filed: February 25, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Cheri C. Cops ey , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with two years determinate, for possession of a controlled substance, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defe nder; Kimberly E. Smith, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Katherine Renee Poe pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance. Idaho Code

§ 37

- 2732(c). The district court se ntenced Poe to a unified term of seven years, with two years

determinate. Poe appeals, contending her sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluati ng the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011,2 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and h aving reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Poe’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David L. Dyckman, as Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of Thermadyne Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  theaccompanying Form 10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2004 asfiled with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: March 31,  2005 |     |                                            |
|-----------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                        |     |                                            |
|                        | By:      | /s/ David L. Dyckman                            |
|                        |     | David L. Dyckman                                |
|                        |     | *Executive  Vice President and*                 |
|                        |     | *Chief  Financial Officer*                      |
| * *                    | * * | *(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pazoo, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Benjamin Hoehn, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
/s/ Benjamin HoehnActing Chief Financial Officer

June 23, 2015








This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION — CEO**CERTIFICATION**I, Richard C. Rochon, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Coconut Palm Acquisition Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, is made known to us by others within such entity,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date: November 13, 2006/s/ Richard C. Rochon   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer   **(principal executive officer)**
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-20-00066-CR

__________________

BEYONKA LIMBRICK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 411th District Court

San Jacinto County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 9,585

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Beyonka Limbrick pleaded 

guilty to possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, a state jail 

felony. The trial court found Limbrick guilty and assessed punishment at two years 

in state jail, then suspended imposition of sentence, placed Limbrick on community 

supervision for five years, and assessed a $500 fine. Subsequently, the State filed a 

motion to revoke Limbrick’s community supervision. Limbrick pleaded “not true” 

to the alleged violations of the terms of the community supervision order. After 
2

conducting an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that Limbrick violated the 

terms of her community supervision, revoked Limbrick’s community supervision, 

and imposed a sentence of ten months of confinement. 

Limbrick’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional

evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1978). On May 15, 2020, we granted an extension of time for Limbrick to file a pro 

se brief. We received no response from Limbrick. We have reviewed the appellate 

record, and we agree with counsel’s conclusion that no arguable issues support an 

appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to rebrief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.1

AFFIRMED.

_________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN

 Chief Justice

Submitted on October 1, 2020

Opinion Delivered November 4, 2020

Do Not Publish 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

1

Limbrick may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for 

discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.8 MB)

Tags:Defense Logisitcs Agency Troop Support, TROOP SUPPORT, Department of Defense, DoD, People and Culture, DLA Troop Support, Defense Logistics Agency, Holiday Season

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Unilens Vision
Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Micheal J. Pecora, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date: December 28, 2009



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Pecora                              
|Michael J. Pecora President/Chief Executive Officer



151
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-60666, 33-82280, 33-89388, 33-65186, 33-92372, 33-96030, 33-33726, 333-04439,
333-16067, 333-16211, 333-21573, 333-23819 and 333-48189 of S3 Incorporated on
Form S-8 and No. 333-17519 on Form S-3 of our report dated January 22, 1998,
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of S3 Incorporated for the year
ended December 31, 1997.

/s/  Price Waterhouse LLP
----------------------------
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Hsinchu, Taiwan R.O.C.
January 22, 1998