**Supporting Statement for a Request for OMB Review under The Paperwork Reduction Act** 
**1 IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION**  **1(a) Title and Number of the Information Collection**  **Title: Notification of Substantial Risk of**  **Injury to Health and the Environment under TSCA Section 8(e)**  **EPA ICR No.: 0794.13 OMB Control No.:**  **2070 -**  **0046 1(b)**  **Short Characterization** Section 8(e) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) states, “an y person who manufactures, [imports,] pro cesses, or distributes in commerce a chemical substance or mixture and who obtains information which reasonabl y supports the conclusion that such substance or mixture presents a substantial risk of injury to health or the environment shall immediately info rm the [EPA] Administrator of such information unless such person has actual knowledge that the Administrator has been adequatel y informed of such information.” (15 U.S.C. 2607(e); see Attachment 1) From January

1977 through December 2008, EPA received 17,233 initial section 8(e) submissions covering a large number of chemical substances and mixtures on a wide range of chemical toxicity

/exposure information. This includes approximately 10,500 submissions EPA received following a 1992 Compliance Audit Pr ogram, described below in Part 2(a). Although EPA’s receipt of section 8(e) information does not necessarily trigger immediate regulatory action under TSCA or other authorities administered by EPA, all section 8(e) submissions receive screening level evaluations by EPA’s Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) to identify

priorities for further Agency action and appropriate referrals to other programs. OPPT routinely

disseminates section 8(e) data to EPA’s Program and Regional Offices and other federal agencies (e.g., NIOSH, OSHA, CPSC, FDA, NTP) on newly discovered chemical hazards/risks. Since June 2001, OPPT has made these referrals primarily via e

- mails of biweekl y tables summarizing all new section 8(e) submissions. There is also public outreach and information access to section 8(e) data through the TSCA Public Docket, online data bases that include TSCA 8(e) records, as well as through the TSCA 8(e) web page that includes all biweekl y reports of new 8(e) submissions back to June 2001 with PDF links to the submissions.**2 NEED FOR AND USE OF THE COLLECTION** 

**2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection**  Section 8(e) of TSCA continues to be an important and useful tool for earl y warning and identification of potential substantial risk situations allowing EPA and others to focus their limited resources on chemicals or mixtures of highest concern. The submission of section 8(e) information makes it possible for the Agency and others to learn quickl y about potential new chemical hazards/risks posed by exposure to chemical substances, to conduct more complete assessments and, if needed, effective action to eliminate or reduce such risks in a timely manner. The statutory

authorit y for this information collection is section 8(e) of TSCA (U .S. Public L aw 94

- 469; 90 Stat. 2029; 15 U.S.C. 2607(e)). No formal rule

- making by the Agency was required to implement section 8(e), in that section 8(e) was a self

- activating reporting provision of TSCA that became immediatel y effective on January 1, 19 77 (the effective date of the Act). However, in order to facilitate compliance with section 8(e), EPA clarified the kinds of information that constitute substantial risk information, specified the t ypes of information exempt from the reporting requirement s, and outlined standard reporting procedures, in published proposed guidance (42 FR 45362; September 9, 1977). After holding several public meetings and considering the public comments on the proposed section 8(e) guidance, the Agency published its final “Statement of Interpretation and Enforcement Policy ; Notification of Substantial Risk” (43 FR 11110; March 16, 1978). In June 1991, EPA published a “Section 8(e) Reporting Guide” to further assist the regulated community in compl yi ng with section 8(e). The 1991 Reporting Guide references examples of submitted information and EPA’s comments on these submissions to help persons subject to section 8(e) better understand the ty pes of information that are reportable under section 8(e). The 1991 Guide also i ncludes dose ranges and exposure factors to consider in determining the section 8(e) reportability of acute lethality data. In February

of 1991, the Agency

initiated a voluntary

section 8(e) “Compliance Audit Program” (CAP). This compliance program, whi ch followed several section 8(e) enforcement cases indicating that some companies were not complying with section 8(e) reporting requirements, was designed to 1) achieve EPA’s goal of obtaining any outstanding section 8(e) data, and 2) provide maximum enco uragement to companies to voluntarily audit their files for section 8(e)

- reportable information. The section 8(e) CAP involved consent agreements/orders pursuant to section 15 of TSCA, stipulated monetary penalties and an overall penalty ceiling. 123 companies elected to participate voluntaril y in the Agency’s section 8(e) CAP activity. The CAP was terminated on May 15, 1996 and settlements with CAP participants were announced on October 15, 1996. In implementing the section 8(e) CAP, EPA determined th at there was a need to suspend and refine those portions of the 1978 section 8(e) Policy Statement that deal specificall y with the reportability

of chemical releases to the environment and the detection of toxic chemicals in environmental media. On July 1 3, 1993 (58 FR 37735), EPA published proposed guidance on the detection of toxic chemicals in environmental media. EPA received comments from 49 companies and industry

associations. Based on the submitted comments and a number ofmeetings with industry r epresentatives, EPA revised the proposed guidance and made it available for additional public comment through a notice in the Federal Register published on March 20, 1995 (60 FR 14756). In response, EPA received an additional 22 comments. While the comme nts offered additional refinements to the revised guidance, their basic tenor was that industry was in support of the changes. Beginning in 1996, there was an ongoing collaboration between EPA and industry to develop a question and answer (Q&A) document to promote industry understanding of and compliance with the Agency ’s anticipated revised section 8(e) reporting criteria for environmental release and contamination information. The intent was to make the Q&A publicl y available before the revised guidanc e was published. However, the finalized Q&A document was not yet available when the revised guidance, “TSCA Section 8(e); Notification of Substantial Risk; Policy

Clarification and Reporting Guidance” (68 FR 33129

- 33139), was published on June 3, 2003. T he revised guidance included a re

- publication of the 1978 Policy Statement and incorporated revisions that address the reporting of information on the release of chemical substances to the environment and the detection of toxic chemicals in environmental m edia. Also included in the June 2003 Reporting Guidance is a change in the deadline for reporting “substantial risk” information to the Agency (from 15 working day s to 30 calendar day s) and the circumstances under which certain information need not be rep orted to EPA under section 8(e) of TSCA. In a subsequent Federal Register Notice, “TSCA Section 8(e) Reporting Guidance; Correction, Clarification of Applicability, and Announcement Regarding the Issuance (of) Questions and Answers” (70 FR 2162

- 2164), EPA announced certain corrections to the June 2003 Reporting Guidance (due to transcription errors from the 1978 Policy Statement that appeared in the June 2003 Guidance), stated that the applicability date for the June 2003 Guidance Document was the publicat ion date, and announced the availability on the TSCA 8(e) web page ( http://www.epa.gov/oppt/tsca8e ) of a Q&A document on the section 8(e) reportability of releases of chemical substances to the environment and t he detection of toxic chemicals in environmental media. This Q&A document included only a few of the items drafted earlier by industry stakeholders with EPA participation, but EPA will be adding Q&As to the TSCA 8(e) web page on environmental releases and other aspects of section 8(e) reporting following further comment and review. **2(b) Use/Users of the Data**  Since 1977, the Agency

and members of the chemical industry have devoted significant efforts in fulfilling their respective responsibilities und er section 8(e). Since January 1, 1977, 16,063 initial section 8(e) notices (includes CAP and non

- CAP submissions) covering a broad range of toxicity

and exposure

- related data on a wide range of chemicals and chemical mixtures have been received b y the Ag ency , screened, and received follow

- up attention as needed. All incoming section 8(e) submissions are reviewed by EPA shortly

after receipt. The initial processing of section 8(e) submissions includes a screening level evaluation of the submitted data. Such evaluations are not risk assessments, nor do they consider other available toxicity data on the chemical or exposure

- related information on the chemical/mixture being reviewed. The results of screening level evaluations are used for priority - setting to select cases for more detailed assessment, as well as to identify referrals to other Offices and Agencies.EPA utilizes section 8(e) submission information for hazard/risk identification purposes

in the initial stages of the TSCA chemical screening a nd review program. Section 8(e) data are also used in ongoing EPA hazard and exposure assessments of both existing and new chemicals, in the SIDS international testing program, in the High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program, and in support of regul ation development under TSCA, e.g., development of chemical testing rules under section 4 of TSCA, as well as regulation development under other authorities administered b y the Agency. In addition, section 8(e) submissions have been the basis for chemical advisories to communicate potential health risks and the need for exposure controls, as well as for chemical summaries to identify data availability

for chemical hazard and exposure assessment. Regardless of the t ype of section 8(e) follow

- up action or activity taken, all reported information not claimed as TSCA confidential business information is made available to other EPA program and Regional Offices, other federal agencies and others (e.g., chemical industry , trade unions, environmental groups, gene ral public, international community) that may be interested in the subject chemical or mixture. EPA Offices and other federal agencies routinel y utilize section 8(e) data in implementing their regulatory programs. The principal vehicles for making the in formation publicly available are the TSCATS database, the TSCA docket, and the TSCA section 8(e) web page at http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/tsca8e . The TSCA 8(e) web page includes all published section 8(e) gu idance and full text copies of all new section 8(e) submissions. EPA’s proactive implementation of section 8(e) has also resulted in heightened corporate awareness of the potential risk of injury posed b y exposure to chemical substances. This increased corporate awareness has led to a variet y of voluntary corporate actions designed to protect human health and/or the environment. Many companies have reported to EPA that the following t ypes of risk reduction/pollution prevention measures were initiated in direct response to the submitted chemical toxicity and/or exposure data:

- Notification of workers, customers and others;

- Revision of product labels and Material Safet y Data Sheets;

- Modification of manufacturing, processing, and/or handling;

- Ceasing production/use either temporaril y or permanently;

- Initiation of additional toxicity or exposure studies to further define potential risks.
**3 NON**  **- DUPLICATION, CONSULTATIONS AND OTHER COLLECTION**  **CRITERIA 3(a)**  **Non -**  **Duplication** There is no other source of data that can be used in place of the data submitted to EPA under the section 8(e) statutory reporting requirement. The “substantial risk” information required to be reported to EPA is unpublished information not already known to the Agency. In additi on, information need not be submitted under section 8(e) if the information has beenreported already to EPA pursuant to another mandatory information reporting requirement of

TSCA or some other authority administered or delegated to the states by EPA. In the June 3, 2003 Reporting Guidance, the Agency clarified the circumstances under which certain information need not be reported to EPA under section 8(e) of TSCA. This is expected to result in some additional reduction of the overall respondent reportin g burden for section 8(e). **3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB**  Prior to submission to OMB, this I CR will be made available to the public for comment through a Federal Register notice. The public will have 60 day s to provide comments. Any comments received will be given consideration when completing the supporting statement that is submitted to OMB. **3(c) Consultations**  EPA personnel have participated in numerous public mee tings and other fora to discuss the section 8(e) Policy

Statement and the Agency ’s implementation of section 8(e). Large EPA

sponsored public meetings at which section 8(e) was a primary topic of discussion were held in 1978, 1986, 1987, 1990 and 1992 with chemical industry representatives and other interested parties. EPA staff also met on numerous occasions with members of the chemical industry to discuss section 8(e) in the context of the section 8(e) Compliance Audit Program. In addition, EPA staff m embers have participated in more than 30 industry

- sponsored meetings at which section 8(e) of TSCA was the major or primary topic of discussion. EPA proposed amendments to the section 8(e) policy statement in 1993 and again in 1995. The proposed amendme nts dealt specifically with clarifications on reporting requirements for occurrences of environmental exposure or contamination. The Agency received numerous public comments on these proposed amendments and developed a “Comment and Response Document for R evised Policy Statement of Section 8(e) of TSCA” (OPPT

- 2002

- 0067

- 0002) to record these comments and the Agency ’s responses. EPA has also collaborated with industry in preparing a question and answer document dealing with revisions to the 1978 Policy State ment and from 1994 to the present section 8(e) has been on the agenda of the “Living with TSCA” conferences held annually for all TSCA stakeholders. Under 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1) OMB requires agencies to consult with potential I CR respondents and data users a bout specific aspects of I CRs before submitting an original or renewal I CR to OMB for review and approval. In accordance with this regulation, EPA will pursue additional consultations with interested parties during the development of the renewal of this c ollection. **3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection**  TSCA section 8(e) reporting is not cyclical but rather is self

- implementing. The statute states that persons covered under the section 8(e) reporting requirement shall immediately notify the EPA Administrator upon obtaining reportable information. As stated previously , section 8(e) continues to be an extremely important and useful EPA tool for earl y identification of potentialsubstantial risk situations and allows the Agency as well as others to f

ocus their resources on those chemicals or mixtures of highest concern. The consequences of EPA’s not receiving section 8(e) data immediately following receipt by

a respondent are serious. The Agency would be prevented from learning about and publicizing new information about substantial risks to health or environmental injury posed b y exposure to chemical substances and/or mixtures. Further, EPA would not be in a position to adequately assess and, if necessary , take action to effectivel y eliminate or re duce such risks in an expeditious manner. **3(e) General Guidelines**  The required reporting that takes place under section 8(e) does not appear to exceed the Paperwork Reduction Act

- imposed guidelines that are found at 5 CFR 1320.6. **3(f) Confidentiality**  Any person submitting a notice to EPA under section 8(e) may assert a claim of business confidentiality

covering information contained in the submission. Any information covered by

a claim will be disclosed by EPA onl y to the extent and by means of the procedures set forth at 40 CFR Part 2. If no confidentiality claim accompanies a section 8(e) notice, the submission is placed in the TSCA Docket and is available to the public without further notice to the submitting organization. The Ag ency has established and actively implements well

- publicized standard procedures for the handling and safeguarding of information claimed as TSCA Confidential Business Information (TSCA CBI). **3(g) Sensitive Questions**  Under section 8(e), EPA does not seek submission of information with regard to sexual behavior or attitudes, religious beliefs, or other matters usually considered to be of a private nature.
**4 RESPONDENTS AND THE INFORMATION REQUESTED**  **4(a) Respondents/NAICS Codes**  A statutory

secti on 8(e) reporting obligation can be incurred by an y person who manufactures, imports, processes or distributes a TSCA

- covered chemical substance or mixture. EPA’s section 8(e) Policy Statement defines the term “person” broadly to include “any

natural pers on, corporation, firm, company , joint

- venture, partnership, sole proprietorship, association, or an y other business entity, an y State or political subdivision thereof, an y municipality , an y interstate body and an y department, agency, instrumentality of the Federal Government.” Although this definition is quite broad in terms of subject persons, section 8(e) reporting obligations are most ty

pically incurred by

companies engaged in activities classified b y NAICS Codes 325

- Chemicals and Allied Products Manu facturers and 32411

- Petroleum Refining.**4(b) Information Requested** 

**(i) Data Items**  There is no required collection instrument or reporting form on which section 8(e) information must be submitted to EPA; however, the section 8(e) Policy Statement requires all respondents to ensure that a written section 8(e) notice:

- is sent to EPA by

a method verifying the Agency ’s receipt;

- states that it is being submitted under section 8(e) of TSCA;

- contains the name, address, job title, phone number and signature of the person reporting, and the name and address of the establishment with which the person is associated;

- identifies the chemical substance(s) or mixture including, if known, the Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) Registry Number(s);

- summarizes adverse health/environmental effects being reported including a description of the nature and extent of the risk; and

- contains the specific source/summary of the supporting data. EPA is continuing its efforts to implement optional electronic reporting of s ection 8(e) submissions to increase processing efficiency for both the Agency

and the regulated community

. **(ii) Respondent Activities**  The overall purpose of section 8(e) reporting is to ensure that new information that reasonabl y supports a conclusion that a chemical substance or mixture presents a “substantial risk” of injury

to health or the environment is brought to EPA’s attention immediately upon discovery . It should be noted again that section 8(e) applies to all chemical manufacturers, importer s, processors, and distributors and applies also to information that a subject person possesses or about which that person has knowledge. Although compliance with section 8(e) does not require subject persons to search for information or to make extraordi nary efforts to acquire information, section 8(e) does apply to information that is “obtained” (i.e., information that a person possesses or about which that person knows). Following a review of existing information and a decision that such information is of the ty pe required under section 8(e), respondents must notify

EPA in writing immediately . EPA’s June 2003 Reporting Guidance defines the term “immediately” in the context of written section 8(e) reports to mean within 30 calendar day s of the date on which the information was obtained; the immediate reporting of an emergency

incident of environmental contamination by a toxic substance is defined as a phone report to EPA or to the National Response Center as soon as a person knows about the incident.**5 INFORMATION COLLECTION**  **- EPA ACTIVITIES, COLLECTION** 

**METHODOLOGY AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 5(a)**  **Agency Activities** As explained in additional detail in the following sections, the Agency’s section 8(e) activities involve answering general and speci fic section 8(e)

- related questions, development and maintenance of computerized information tracking (including data extraction, entry and quality assurance/control), microfilming, confidential (restricted

- access) and non

- confidential (public

access) secti on 8(e) information filing, initial evaluation of all submitted section 8(e) information (including review of TSCA Confidential Business Information (CBI) substantiations), and the posting of section 8(e)

- related information on the Internet for public acce ss. **5(b) Collection Methodology and Information Management**  EPA uses Document Control Numbers (DCNs) to identify TSCA submissions; section 8(e) has the following format: 88

- YYXXXXXXX. The assigned 7

- digit ascending numbers begin each ye ar with 000000 1. EPA also identifies section 8(e) submissions by 8EHQ Numbers, which are chronological from January 1977. The format is 8EHQ

- MMYY
- XXXXX. Initial submissions are assigned as Sequence A; supplemental and follow

- up submissions are assigned Sequence B, C, D, etc. Internal EPA tracking of section 8(e) submission information is handled via non

- confidential and confidential computerized data bases. In order to assure that the public is kept apprised of new adverse chemical

- related toxicity and exposure inf

ormation, the Agency

provides public access to and actively disseminates non

confidential section 8(e) submission information in many way s. Examples of EPA’s public access/outreach activities follow. Non
- confidential section 8(e) initial and follow

- up/supplemental submissions, status reports, submission summaries, and EPA follow

- up letters can be viewed/copied in the TSCA Public Docket located at EPA Headquarters. Non

- confidential section 8(e)

- related documents can also be obtained b y writing to EPA’s Freedom of Information Office. Relevant non

- confidential information from section 8(e) submissions is routinely entered into TSCATS (Toxic Substances Control Act Test Submissions), a publicly available computerized data base that serves as an on

- line index of unpublished health and safet y studies submitted to EPA under TSCA. The most recent version of the TSCATS data base is available on the web at http://yosemite.epa.gov/oppts/epatscat8.nsf/ReportSearch?OpenForm . The submitted studies themselves are stored and available on microfiche. Microfiche copies of the studies referenced in the TSCATS database are available from either CI S or the National Technical Information Service (NT IS ) in Springfield, VA. EPA has also been creating full electronic (PDF) copies of all new section 8(e) submissions since June 2001. Electronic copies of these most recent section 8(e) submissions are available to the public from the TSCA Public Docket, as well as from the section 8(e) web site at http://www.epa.gov/oppt/tsca8e

.Under established Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) procedures, EPA respon ds to

requests from industry , other stakeholders and the public. And in cooperation with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) information

- gathering “Switchboard” project, EPA responds as well to international requests for sec tion 8(e) and other unpublished health and safet y data on chemicals of concern to OECD members. As stated previousl y, EPA routinely notifies other Federal Agencies on incoming section 8(e) information via biweekl y tabular reports of new section 8(e) subm issions and by targeted referrals. As the direct result of these public outreach activities, several of these other Agencies activel y publicize the information even further. For example, the National Library of Medicine (NLM) at the National Institutes o f Health makes section 8(e) information available via its publicly available computerized Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB) and Toxline data bases. In addition, the National Institute for Occupational Safet y and Health (NIOSH) cites section 8(e) notic es in the printed and on

- line computerized versions of the “Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances” (RTECS) data base. **5(c) Small Entity Flexibility**  The statutory

obligation to report information under section 8(e) of TSCA applies to all manufacturers, importers, processors, and/or distributors of TSCA

- covered chemical substances and mixtures. The statutory language of section 8(e) itself does not allow for any reporting exemption or burden minimization based on the size or earnings of a re spondent. However, nearl y all reporting is b y large and medium size companies. This is mainly because onl y larger companies have the financial resources to conduct toxicity testing that comprises most section 8(e) reporting. Since there is no routine reporting or recordkeeping provisions for section 8(e), the true burden on most small entities is practically nonexistent. **5(d) Collection Schedule**  Considering that section 8(e) submissions are received by the Agency

on an ad hoc basis, there is no standard reporting cycle. Submitters are required to comply with section 8(e) immediately

when they

come into possession of or know about section 8(e)

- reportable information. If section 8(e) information were not made available immediately to EPA, the Agency ’s ability

to learn about, publicize, effectively assess, and respond appropriatel y to newl y discovered chemical

- related risks would be severely impeded, if not completely thwarted.
**6 ESTIMATING THE BURDEN AND COST OF COLLECTION**  For the current IC R ren ewal, EPA utilized data on the number of section 8(e) submissions for fiscal years FY 200 9

- 20 11 . The averaged annual number of initial 8(e) submissions was 364 (392+413+286=1,091/3). The averaged annual number of supplemental and follow

- up 8(e) submissions was 179 (136+114+288=538/3). In the previous ICR renewal, it was determined that for initial section 8(e)s, submission equivalents were also estimated to account for the need to review data that are not ultimatelysubmitted as TSCA 8(e). F or initial section 8(e)s, the number of submission equivalents is used

instead of the number of actual submissions. Assum ing that the number of cases not submitted is 50% of the number of cases submitted, the number of initial section 8(e) submission equi valents per year for the next three years increase s from 364 to 546 (364 x 1.5). **6(a) Estimating Submitter Burden**  The following discussion provides the basis for the Agency ’s upper

- bound estimate of approximately 28,741 total hours of annual reporting burden for submitters in complying with section 8(e). EPA believes that it should take approximately 49 hours per submission to judge and concur on the section 8(e)

- applicability of obtained information plus 2 additional hours to prepare/submit the nece ssary information. The first figure is based on an average of 45 hours per submission of managerial and technical staff time to review and evaluate data and an additional 4 hours for staff training on TSCA 8(e) regulatory requirements. Using the calculat ed average of 546 initial section 8(e) submission equivalents per year, the total number of hours required for initial section 8(e) reporting is estimated to be 27,846 (546 x 51) hours. The submission of follow

- up/supplemental information in response to EPA questions on the initial section 8(e) submission, or as a result of further investigation/evaluation by the compan y, is estimated to be 5 hours per notice, assuming 3 hours to assemble the required information, 1 hour to prepare the submission, and 1 h our for review. Using the calculated average of 136 follow

- up/supplemental submissions per year, the total number of hours required for follow

- up/supplemental section 8(e) reporting is estimated to be 895 (179 x 5) hours. Therefore, the total number of s ection 8(e) initial submission equivalents plus follow

up/supplemental submissions is 725 (546 + 179) submissions per year with an estimated respondent reporting burden of 28,741 (27,846 + 895) hours per ye ar. **INITIAL SUBMISSIONS SUBTOTAL** Burden It em Hour s/Submitter Submissions/Year Hours/Year

a 1 49 546 26,754 b 2 2 546 1,092 27,846 1 Reflects managerial/technical review, data evaluation, decision

- making and concurrence processes to determine the section 8(e)

- reportability and crafting the usually 1

- 2 page section 8(e) notification letter. 2 Reflects general clerical work (typing, copying, and sending the section 8(e) submission). Considering that the respondent’s decision

- making/concurrence activities for determining section 8(e)

- applicability/reportability has already taken place for the initial submission, the activities surrounding the submission of follow

- up/supplemental information related to the initial submission are viewed by the Agency as being less burdensome as follows:**FOLLOW -**  **UP AND SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSIONS SUBTOTAL**

Burden It em Hours/Submitter Submissions/Year Hours/Year

a 1 4 179 716 b 2 1 179 179 895 1 This item involves managerial and technical revie w, concurrence and letter writing activities in submitting a follow

- up/supplemental section 8(e) submission. 2 This item reflects the typing, copying and transmittal of a follow

- up/supplemental section 8(e) submission. Based on the figures presented in the preceding tables, the total submitter burden (in hours/year) for initial and follow

- up/supplemental section 8(e) submissions to EPA is as follows: **TOTAL HOURLY BURDEN/YEAR Initial**  **Follow -**  **Up/Supplemental Total**  **Submissions +**  **Submissions =**  **Hours/Year** 27,846 hours/year + 895 hours/year = 28,741 **6(b) Estimating Subm**  **itter Costs** EPA estimates that a respondent incurs costs up to $69.21/hour in managerial/technical labor costs and $27.59/hour in clerical labor costs in submitting information to EPA under section 8(e). These hourly costs take into account the involveme nt of the respondent’s managerial, technical and clerical personnel and takes into account standard labor wage rates (including fringe benefits) using Bureau of Labor Statistics (BL S) wage rates for the Private Manufacturing industries adjusted for the ye ar 2011. It should be noted that section 8(e) reporting does not involve operating/maintenance or capital costs to the respondent. The hourl y labor wage rates used in the computations appear below. **Hourly Labor Rates** * Labor Category 2007 Hourly Rate Managerial $ 69.21 Technical $ 55.42 Clerical $ 27.59 EPA staff $ 68.99 *See Appendix A for derivations.Based on the total estimated reporting burden of 28,741 hours/y ear and the hourly labor rates listed above, the annual cost for submitters to comply with section 8(e) is estimated to be $1,936,264 as follows. **TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS** Burden Item Submitter

Hours/Year (Initial) Submitter Hours/Year

(Supplemental) Total

Hours/Year Wage

Rate Total

Cost/Year

a 1 26,754 716 27,470 $69.21/hr $1,901,197
b 2 1,092 179 1,271 $27.59/hr $35,067 **$1,936,264** 1 Reflects managerial/technical review, data evaluation, decision

- making and concurrence processes to determine the section 8(e)

- reportability and crafting the usually 1

- 2 page section 8(e) notification letter. 2 Reflects general clerical work (typing, copying, and sending the section 8(e) submission). **6(c) Estimating EPA Burden and Costs**  Based on reasonable costs for reports received b y EPA as the result of general section 8 rule

- making activities, EPA estimates the cost per submission can range from $275 to $ 900. This assumes that it takes a GS

- 13 Step 5 staff member between 4 and 13 hours to process, cop y, file, and initially

review and/or answer questions on each section 8(e) submission (4 * $68.99 and 13 * $68.99). Therefore, EPA estimates its total annual cost for these activities involving 725 incoming section 8(e) submissions (546 initial plus 179 follow

- up/supplemental notices per ye ar) to range from $198,275

- $648,900 per ye ar as follows: **EPA BURDEN/COSTS Initial/Follow**  **- Up/Supplemental**  **Cost of EPA Total**  **Submissions per Year x**  **Processing/ Review =**  **Cost/Year** 725 submissions/year x $275

- $900/Submission = $199,375

- $652,500/ year **6(d) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Costs**  General note: A full discussion and description of the rationale used to derive the following burden estimates can be found in sections 6(a), 6(b) and 6(c) of this Supporting Statement and is summarized below.**(i) Submitters’ Annual Burden (Hours and Costs)** 

**(a) Hours**  Initial Sect ion 8(e) Submissions 51 hours x 546 submissions = 27,846 hours Follow

- up/Supplemental Section 8(e) Submissions 5 hours x 179 submissions = 895 hours Submitters’ Total Annual Hourly Burden 27,846 hours + 895 hours = 28,741 hours **(b) Costs**  Submitters’ Total Annual Cost 27,470 managerial hours x $69.21/hour = $ 1,901,197 1,271 clerical hours x $27.59/hour = $35,067 $ 1,901,197 + $35,067= $ 1,936,264 **(ii) EPA’s Annual Burden/Cost**  Initial Section 8(e) Submissions 546 submissions x $275

- $900/submission = $150,150

- $491,400 Follow

- up/Supplemental Section 8(e) Submissions 179 submissions x $275

- $900/submission = $49,225

- $161,100 EPA’s Total Annual Estimated Burden/Cost 725 submissions x $275

- $900/submission = $199,375

- $ 652,500 **6(e) Change in Burden**  There is a decrease of 1,774 hours (30,515 to 28,741 hours) in the total estimated respondent burden compared with that identified in the information collection request most recentl y approved b y OMB. This difference in burden hours is consistent primarily due to an increase in submissions for a number of reasons. First, there has been increased awareness andtherefore enforcement of the submissions. With the High Production Volume Challenge

Program, the public has the ri ght to know information on the hazard of certain chemicals. Data from the 8(e) submissions is often used for this program. Companies have also been submitting information on chemicals to assure that there is no enforcement action taken upon the companies d ue to the chemical hazard assessment, which reviews chemicals on the Toxic Release Inventory
. The estimate in submitter annual costs associated with this I CR is higher than the previous section 8(e) ICR because of the above considerations as well as the increased hourl y labor rates. The previous estimate was based on a simpler BL S data series whereas the current ICR uses an overhead rate of 17% based on assumptions in Wage Rates for Economic Analyses of the Toxics Release Inventory Program (Rice, 2002) an d the Revised Economic Analysis for the Amended Inventory Update Rule: Final Report (EPAB, 2002). 2007 is the most recent y ear for which wage rates were available not subject to revision by BLS. **6(f) Burden Statement**  The annual public burden for this collection of information, which is approved under OMB Control No. 2070

- 0046, is estimated to average 51 hours per initial section 8(e) submission and 5 hours per follow

- up/supplemental section 8(e) submission. Burden is defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(b). An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it display s a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for this information collection appe ars above. In addition, the OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations, after initial display in the final rule, are listed in 40 CFR part 9. The Agency

has established a public docket for this I CR under Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

OPPT

- 201 2

- 0 674 , which is avai lable for online viewing at www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Pollution Prevention and Toxics Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC). The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is located in the EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW ., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the Pollution Prevention and Toxics Docket is (202) 566

- 0280. You may submit comments regarding the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of autom ated collection techniques. Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OPPT

- 201 2

- 0 674 and OMB Control No. 2070

- 00 46 , to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), or b y mail to: Pollution Prevention and Toxics Docket, Env ironmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), Mail C ode: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB b y mail to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503.