alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER JESSE TORRES,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 16

- 30062

D.C. No. 1:07

- cr

- 00235

- EJL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2017 **

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Christopher Jesse Torres appeals from the district court’ s judgment and

challenges the 24

- month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Torres contends that the district court procedurally erred by mis calculating

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 22 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 30062

the Guidelines range

, failing to explain adequately the sentence , and relying on

improper sentencing factors. Contrary to Torres’s contention, th e district court

correctly calculated the Guidelines range because it properly concluded that his

state criminal conviction was a G rade B violation

. See U.S.S.G. § 7B1.1 (a)(2);

United States v. Jones , 696 F.3d 932, 935

- 37 (9th Cir. 2012) (court properly

treated conduct as Grade B violation where it was punishable by a term of

imprisonment exceeding one year due to application of enhancement)

.

Furthermore, the district court’s explanation of the sentence was legally sufficient.

See United States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Finally,

the record reflects that the district court considered only the proper 8 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e) sentencing factors, including Torres’s criminal history and the need to

protect the public. See United States v. Simtob , 4 85 F.3d 1 058 , 1 062 (9th Cir.

200 7)

.

Torres ne xt contends that his sentence i s substantively unreasonable because

the district court imposed it to run consecutive to his sentence for the state criminal

conviction which formed the basis of the violation. The district court did not abuse

its discretion. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The consecut ive

sentence i s substantively reasonable in light of the section 3583 ( e ) factors and the

totality of the circumstances , including Torres’s extensive criminal history, his

failure to be deterred by prior sentences, and the need to protect the public

. See3 16

- 30062

Gall , 552 U.S. at 51; see also U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f)

.

AFFIRMED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.68 MB)

Tags:Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, Industrial Hardware, Department of Defense, DLA Troop Support, Defense Logistics Agency, DOD, DLA, Troop Support, people and culture, teambuilding

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
DEMETRIUS ANDERSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3129

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 5, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Ysleta W. Mcdonald , Judge

.

Dane K. Chase and Tim Bower R odriguez, Tampa , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Joshua R. Heller, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., MARSTILLER and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.43 MB)

Tags:commissioned officer, Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, Defense Logistics Agency, promotion ceremony, Chicago Heights, Ill. native

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MOHAMMED DRAMMEH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-74998

Agency No. A096-145-417

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 6, 2012** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Mohammed Drammeh, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding

of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

FILED

MAR 14 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
08-74998

substantial evidence factual findings. Sowe v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1281, 1285 (9th

Cir. 2008). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. 

 We lack jurisdiction to consider Drammeh’s request for a humanitarian

grant of asylum because he did not raise this claim to the agency. See

Rodas-Mendoza v. INS, 246 F.3d 1237, 1240 (9th Cir. 2001). 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Drammeh failed

to establish that his experiences in Sierra Leone rose to the level of persecution, see

Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir. 2003), or that he was targeted on

account of a protected ground, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 482-84

(1992). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s conclusion that Drammeh

failed to establish a future fear of persecution. See Nagoulko, 333 F.3d at 1018

(possibility of future persecution too speculative). Accordingly, Drammeh’s

asylum claim fails.

Because Drammeh failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily

failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Zehatye

v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.15 MB)

Tags:DLA 51st Employee Recognition Award Winners

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE> 1

<TABLE>
Exhibit 11.1
Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
<CAPTION>
                                               For the Year Ended December 31,
                                               -------------------------------
                                                  1996                 1995
                                               ----------           ----------
<S>                                            <C>                  <C>
PRIMARY SHARES:
--------------

  Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding                   2,198,675            1,965,586

  Effect of shares issuable under
    all stock option plans as
    determined by the treasury
    stock method                                  187,367               90,845
                                               ----------           ----------

  Weighted average number of
    primary common shares
    outstanding as adjusted                     2,386,042            2,056,431
                                               ==========           ==========

Per primary common share computations:

  Net income                                   $1,808,000           $1,275,000
                                               ==========           ==========

  Per primary common share                          $0.76                $0.62
                                               ==========           ==========

FULLY DILUTED SHARES:
--------------------

  Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding                   2,198,675            1,965,586

  Effect of shares issuable under
    all stock option plans as
    determined by the treasury
    stock method                                  217,770              187,283
                                               ----------           ----------

  Weighted average number of
    fully diluted common shares
    outstanding as adjusted                     2,416,445            2,152,869
                                               ==========           ==========

Per fully diluted common share computations:

  Net income                                   $1,808,000           $1,275,000

  Add interest on debentures,
    net of tax effect                                  --               28,000
                                               ----------           ----------

  Net income, as adjusted                      $1,808,000           $1,303,000
                                               ==========           ==========

  Per fully diluted common share                    $0.75                $0.61
                                               ==========           ==========
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The Federal Register Notice for the ACRS Subcommittee meeting on Thermal-Hydraulics Phenomena scheduled to be held on February 22, 2012, has been cancelled.

                    The notice of this meeting was previously published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 1, 2012 [77 FR 5063].                

                    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting Kent Howard, Designated Federal Official (Telephone: 301-415-2989, Email:                     *Kent.Howard@nrc.gov*) between 7:30 a.m. and 5:15 p.m. (ET).                

Dated: February 13, 2012.

Antonio F. Dias,

Technical Advisor, Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.

[FR Doc. 2012-3842 Filed 2-16-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 21 September 2005         

on State aid No C 5/2004 (ex N 609/2003) which Germany is planning to implement for Kronoply

(notified under document number C(2005) 3497)

(Only the German text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/262/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 88(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 62(1)(a) thereof,

Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those provisions (1) and having regard to their comments,

Whereas:

1.   PROCEDURE

2.   DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE AID

2.1.   First notification N 813/2000

2.2.   Second notification N 609/2003

2.3.   Decision to initiate the procedure

3.   COMMENTS FROM GERMANY

4.   COMMENTS FROM INTERESTED PARTIES

5.   ASSESSMENT

5.1.   No further eligible investment costs within the meaning of the regional aid guidelines

5.2.   Incentive effect

5.2.1.   Investment process

5.2.2.   Ex ante assessment of the incentive effect under the regional aid guidelines

5.2.3.   Ex post assessment of the incentive effect on the basis of the facts

5.3.   Necessity

6.   CONCLUSIONS

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The state aid which, according to notification N 609/2003, Germany is planning to implement for Kronoply, amounting to €3 936 947, is incompatible with the common market.

The aid may accordingly not be implemented.

Article 2

Germany shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this decision, of the measures taken to comply with it.

Article 3

This decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.

Done at Brussels, 21 September 2005.

For the Commission

Neelie KROES            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ C 258, 20.10.2004, p. 12.

(2)OJ C 107, 7.4.1998, p. 7.

(3)  See footnote 2.

(4)  OSB is a wooden panel used in construction and consisting of three layers of ‘strands’ made primarily of pine. It is used in timber frame construction, in particular for the refurbishment and restoration of old buildings, in the prefabricated building industry and in the packaging industry.

(5)  Consisting of investment aid in the form of (i) a non-repayable grant amounting to €19,92 million under the 29th general plan of the joint Federal Government/Länder scheme for improving regional economic structures and (ii) an investment allowance of €15,48 million under the Investment Allowance Law 1999.

(6)OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1; as amended by the 2004 Acts of Accession.

(7)  Case T-130/02 Kronoply v Commission [2003] ECR II-4857.

(8)  See footnote 7, paragraph 50.

(9)  Case T-212/00 Nuove Industrie Molisane Srl v Commission [2002] ECR II-347, paragraph 47.

(10)  See footnote 9, paragraph 41.

(11)OJ C 74, 10.3.1998, p. 9.

(12)  Case C-288/96 Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I-8237, paragraph 48.

(13)  Case 730/79 Philip Morris v Commission [1980] ECR 2671.

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.11 MB)

Tags:Promotion ceremony, DLA Installation Operations Richmond, fire department, People and Culture

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Te xas

May 13, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00115

- CV

UNIVERSITY OF THE INCARNATE WORD,

Appellant

v.

Valerie REDUS , Individually, and Robert M. Redus, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Cameron Redus,

Appellees

From the 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 07249 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Court reporter Mary Scopas filed a notification of later reporter’s record, requesting an
extension of time. We GRANT her request. The reporter’s record has now been filed.

________________________________ _ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 13th day of May, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court