alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.75 MB)

Tags:Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, Defense Logistics Agency, Army Quartermaster General, Future Warfighter Support

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 10(a)


 


[Sutherland
Asbill and Brennan LLP Letterhead]


 


STEPHEN E. ROTH


DIRECT LINE: 202.383.0158


Internet:
steve.roth@sutherland.com


 


April 26, 2010


 


Board of Directors


Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company


2801 Highway 201 South


Birmingham, Alabama 35223


 


Directors:


 


We hereby consent to the reference to our
name under the caption “Legal Matters” in the statement of additional
information filed as part of post-effective amendment number 5 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-146508) filed by Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company
and Variable Annuity Account A of Protective Life with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.  In giving this
consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is
required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.


 


 


	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Stephen E. Roth

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   Stephen E. Roth
**No. DA 20**  **- 0115** 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

______________________ T HE C IT

Y OF M ISSOULA , Plaintiff and Appellant, VS . M OUNTAIN W

ATER C OMPANY , a Montana Corporation ; AND C ARLYLE INFRASTRUCTURE P ARTNERS , LP, a Delaware limit ed partnership , Defendants/Appellees and Cross
Appellants, AND T HE E MPLOYEES OF M OUNTAIN W ATER C OMPANY ,

Intervenors and Appellees
.

__________________ ON APPEAL F ROM T HE M ONTANA F OURTH JUDICIAL D ISTRICT C OURT , M ISSOULA C OUNTY , H ON . K AREN T OWNSEND , P RESIDING C ASE N O . DV - 14 - 352

______________________________________________________________________________ **GRANT OF UNOPPOSED M OTION FOR**  **E XTENSION OF TIME** 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

### Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), Defendant/Appellee, Cross Appellant Carlyle Infrastructure Partners, LP’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to F ile Opening Brief is granted. Plaintiff/Appellee, Cross Appellant Carlyle Infrastructure Partners, LP may file and serve its opening brief on or before September 18, 2020. Dated: __________, 20 20 . 15155395_v1 Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court August 4 2020

08/04/2020
<PAGE> 249

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ENTITY                             LEGAL STATUS
STATUS
---------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
-------
<S>                                <C>
<C>
Coastal Federal Mortgage Company   a New Jersey corporation
active
Coastal Federal Mortgage Company   d/b/a CFM Mortgage Company: NY, SC
active
Coastal Federal Mortgage Company   d/b/a Freeway Funding: NY, PA, NC, FL
active
Finet Corporation                  a California corporation
dormant
Finet Corporation                  d/b/a Finet Mortgage
dormant
Finet Correspondent, Inc.          a California corporation
dormant
Finet Holdings Corporation <F1>    a Delaware Corporation
active
FWC Shell Company                  a California corporation
dormant
iQualify                           a California corporation
active
Mical Mortgage, Inc.               a California corporation
active
Monument Mortgage, Inc.            a California corporation
active
Monument Mortgage, Inc.            d/b/a Capital Mortgage, CA, NV
dormant
Monument Mortgage, Inc.            d/b/a Finet Direct
active
Monument Mortgage, Inc.            d/b/a Finet Mortgage: MA
active
Monument Mortgage, Inc.            d/b/a Interloan
active
Monument Mortgage, Inc.            d/b/a Monument Acceptance Corporation
active
Monument Mortgage, Inc.            d/b/a PAMN: WA
dormant
Monument Mortgage, Inc.            d/b/a Politzer Group
dormant
PreferenceAmerica Mortgage Network a California Corporation
dormant
PreferenceAmerica Mortgage Network d/b/a American Mortgage Benefits Network
dormant
Property Transaction Network       a California corporation
active
<FN>
<F1>
FWC Shell Corporation, Inc., a wholly owned Finet subsidiary, has three
wholly owned subsidiaries: RPM Mortgage, Inc., RPM Fremont, Inc. and RPM
Affiliates, Inc, each a dormant California corporation.
<?FN>
</TABLE>
EXHIBT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Talieh Safadi, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Telynx, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual
Report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c.   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

Date:  January 12, 2007

/s/ Talieh Safadi
----------------------------------

Talieh Safadi, Chief Executive Officer
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Lori Elizabeth Hill, Appellant

No. 06-16-00058-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 82nd District Court of 

Falls County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 9475). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Lori Elizabeth Hill, has adequately indicated her inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 14, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Potline

SS198

A-398 Dry 

Scrubber 

SA398

12 

Individual 

Stacks 

SA3982

Alcoa Massena West Subpart LL Process Flow Diagram 

Page 1 5/11/11

= EU S-00001 

Potline

= Emission Point

= Emission Flow

Anode Bake 

Furnace 

SS078

Bush Baily Dry 

Scrubber 

SS78S

Stack 

S0078

Green Mill 

SS099

Procedair Dry 

Coke Scrubber 

SS100

Stack 

S0100 

= EU S-00002 

Bake Furnace

= EU S-00003 

Green Mill

Pitch Storage 

Tank 

S0088

Empty Pitch 

Storage Tank 

S0089

Vent 

SS089

= EU S-00005 

Coal Tar Pitch 

Storage

12 

Individual 

Stacks 

SA3981

12 

Individual 

Stacks 

SA3983
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1831
HERSCHELL L. HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SUE KING, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-96-238) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 18, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herschell L. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, Harris v. King , No. CA-96-238 (E.D. Va. Mar. 21, 1996), but modify the dismissal to be without prejudice. 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1994). We denyAppellant's motions for production of documents, expedited consideration, and to amend the caption. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Attachment B—Lake Road Aerial Photo
-78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 39

 40

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

09/05

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 05 Sep 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0129]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 15, 2012 (77 FR 8880). The document announced an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain information by the Agency. The document was published with an incorrect docket number. This document corrects that error.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Joyce Strong, Office of Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, rm. 3208,                               ( print page 10753)                            Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-9148.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 2012-3548, appearing on page 8880, in the                     **Federal Register**                     of Wednesday, February 15, 2012, the following correction is made:                

On page 8880, in the second column, in the Docket No. heading, “[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-1029]” is corrected to read “[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0129]”.

Dated: February 16, 2012.

Leslie Kux,

Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-4168 Filed 2-22-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











The undersigned, Matthew Neher, the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Treasurer of Greentech Mining International, Inc. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th day of August, 2012.








Dated:  August 14, 2012








/s/Matthew J. Neher


Matthew J. Neher


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Greentech Mining International, Inc. and will be retained by Greentech Mining International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.6

                                1ST AMENDMENT TO
                         EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the 18th day of August, 1998, between KIM MACKAY, a
Washington resident ("Executive"), and MOSAIX, INC., a Washington corporation
("Company").

The parties agree as follows:

1.       AMENDMENT OF PRIOR AGREEMENT.

This Agreement amends that certain "Executive Employment Agreement" dated as of
April 28, 1998 between Executive and the Company. Except as expressly provided
herein, the terms and conditions of that agreement remain in effect between the
parties, and defined terms therein shall have the same meaning when used in this
Agreement.

2.       SEVERANCE PAYMENTS.

Section 7 of the Executive Employment Agreement is hereby amended so that, in
the event Executive terminates his employment for Good Reason, or if the Company
terminates employment without cause following a Corporate Transaction, the
Company shall be obligated to pay to Executive his then regular base salary for
a period of eighteen months after the effective date of termination of
employment (as opposed to 6 months, as originally provided). This amendment will
not apply in the event of any termination unrelated to a Corporate Transaction.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and entered into this Agreement as
of the date above first written.

EXECUTIVE:                        COMPANY:
                              
                                  MOSAIX, INC.,
                                  a Washington Corporation
                              
                              
/s/ Kim Mackay                    By: /s/ Wm. Bradford Weller
------------------------------        ------------------------------------------
KIM MACKAY                            Wm. Bradford Weller
                                      Its General Counsel & Assistant Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports, dated August 27, 1999, included in this Form 10-K, into the previously
filed Registration Statements of Medical Manager Corporation (formerly
Synetic, Inc.) and Subsidiaries on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-34925, 33-34926,
33-38446, 33-46639, 33-46640, 333-19043, 333-21555, 333-36041, 333-72517,
333-72567, and 333-81123).


                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP




New York, New York
September 27, 1999
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 46084

STATE OF IDAHO
,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

JOSHUA LEON WEEKS
,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: February 14, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
OPINION AND SHALL NOT
BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for possession of a controlled substance, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State A ppellate Public Defender; Jenny C. Swinford

, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Atto rney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Joshua Leon Weeks pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance . I.C. § 37

- 27362(c)

. In exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed. The district court

sentenced Weeks to a unified term of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of two

years

. Weeks appeals, arguing that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our stand ard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and2 need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Weeks ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Page 1 

### Notes from Call with Vectren Corporation on January 21 , 201 4

On Tu esday, January 21 , 201 4
, ERG contacted the Vectren Corporation to discuss what appeared to be a discrepancy between information provided regarding the questionnaire responses for the A.B.
Brown Station (Plant ID 8502) and the Vectren Corporation’s comments on the proposed steam electric
effluent limitatio ns guidelines and standards (ELGs) (EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 2009

- 0819

- 4317

- A1) . In the questionnaire responses, the company noted that the A.B. Brown Station had a flue gas desulfurization (FGD) wastewater flow rate of 1.242 MGD coming from the truck bay wash and the b elt filter wash area. However, in the company’s comments on the proposed ELGs, the company stated that the plant did not discharge any FGD wastewater. ERG asked Lisa Messinger, the primary technical contact for the questionnaire, about this discrepancy. Ms. Messinger provided ERG with the following information :

The FGD wastewater generated from the truck bay wash area and the belt filter wash area are transferred to the ash pond and the ash pond does not discharge to surface water. All the ash pond wat er is reused at the plant; therefore, there is no discharge of FGD wastewater from the plant. In terms of the large flow rate for the belt filter wash water, the plant continually washes the underside of the belt filter with fire hoses using ash pond wate r as the source of the wash water. This operation results in a large volume of water that is transferred to the ash pond but is ultimately returned to the FGD system for use as belt filter wash water.

Ms. Messinger provided ERG with additional informati on regarding the FGD wastewater flow rates via email after the call. See Appendices A through D of these notes for the additional information provided. Based on the information provided, ERG determined that the A.B. Brown plant does not discharge FGD was tewater to surface water.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1196 KA 10-00283**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
JEFFREY WYNTERS, ALSO KNOWN AS JOHN DOE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DREW R. DUBRIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LESLIE E. SWIFT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David D. Egan, J.), rendered September 25, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of attempted rape in the third degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: November 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court