alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.08 MB)

Tags:Department of Defense, Safety, Defense Logistics Agency, DLA, National Preparedness Month, Disaster Preparedness, Emergency Planning

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### The ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellants, v. BENCHCRAFT, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 74-1315.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 1974.

Decided Sept. 30, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 16, 1974.

Sam D. Parker, Jack W. R. Headley, Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., and Daniel M. Dibble, Kansas City, Mo., for appellants.

George L. Gisler, Lex A. Passman, and Howard D. Lay, Kansas City, Mo., for appellees.

Before VOGEL, Senior Circuit Judge, and ROSS and WEBSTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Summary judgment in favor of Benchcraft, Inc., Delivery, Inc. and Capitol Truck Lines, Inc. is affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the District Court. (Atchison, Topeka *&*Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Benchcraft, Inc., 381 F. Supp. 603 (W.D.Mo.1974)). Judge Collinson has accurately stated the applicable law and has properly applied the law to the facts. No purpose would be served in attempting to elaborate on his well considered opinion.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9844-9845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3855]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9571]
RIN 1545-BJ84


Allocation and Apportionment of Interest Expense; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final regulations 
(TD 9571), which were published in the Federal Register on January 17, 
2012 (77 FR 2225) that provide guidance regarding the allocation and 
apportionment of interest expense.

DATES: This correction is effective on February 21, 2012, and is 
applicable on January 17, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey L. Parry, (202) 622-3850 (not 
a toll-free call).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The temporary regulations (TD 9571) that are the subject of these 
corrections are under section 864 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the temporary regulations contain errors that may 
prove to be misleading and are in need of clarification.

List of Subjects 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendments:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in 
part as follows:

    Authority:  26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *


Sec.  1.861-9T  [Corrected]

0
Par. 2. Section 1.861-9T is amended by revising paragraph (l) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  1.861-9T  Allocation and apportionment of interest expense 
(temporary).

* * * * *
    (l) Expiration date. The applicability date of paragraphs (e)(2), 
(e)(3), and (h)(4) expires on January 13, 2015.


Sec.  1.861-11T  [Corrected]

0
Par. 3. Section 1.861-11T is amended by revising paragraph (i) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  1.861-11T  Special rules for allocating and apportioning interest 
expense of an affiliated group of corporations (temporary).

* * * * *

[[Page 9845]]

    (i) Expiration date. The applicability date of paragraph (d)(6)(ii) 
expires on January 13, 2015.

Robin R. Jones,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Publications and Regulations Branch, 
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, Procedure and 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-3855 Filed 2-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Haley, Appellant.

(No. 30869

Decided January 15, 1947.)

*Mr. Deane McLaughlin,*prosecuting attorney, *Mr. John Rossetti*and *Mr. W. Bernard Rodgers,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Amerman, Mills, Mills, Jones é Mansfield,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason- that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Sohngen, J., not participating.
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 489 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘Growth Awareness Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 26, 2014 

Mr. KIRK (for himself and Mr. MENENDEZ) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JULY 23, 2014 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘Growth Awareness 

Week’’. 

Whereas, according to the Pictures of Standard Syndromes 

and Undiagnosed Malformations database (commonly 

known as the ‘‘POSSUM’’ database), more than 600 serious diseases and health conditions cause growth failure; 

Whereas health conditions that cause growth failure may affect the overall health of a child; 

Whereas short stature may be a symptom of a serious underlying health condition; 

Whereas children with growth failure are often undiagnosed; 

Whereas, according to the MAGIC Foundation for children’s 

growth, 48 percent of children in the United States who 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 489 ATS 

were evaluated for the 2 most common causes of growth 

failure were undiagnosed with growth failure; 

Whereas the longer a child with growth failure goes 

undiagnosed, the greater the potential for damage and 

higher costs of care; 

Whereas early detection and a diagnosis of growth failure are 

crucial to ensure a healthy future for a child with growth 

failure; 

Whereas raising public awareness of, and educating the public about, growth failure is a vital public service; 

Whereas support for identification of growth failure will allow 

for early detection; and 

Whereas the MAGIC Foundation for children’s growth has 

designated the third week of September as ‘‘Growth 

Awareness Week’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the third week of September 

3 2014 as ‘‘Growth Awareness Week’’; and 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘Growth 

5 Awareness Week’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002),I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Golf Galaxy, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended August 27, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 
| Date: October 11, 2005 | /s/ RANDALL K. ZANATTA                             |   |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        | Randall K. Zanatta                                 |
|                        | *President, Chief Executive  Officer and Chairman* |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Richard C. Nordvold, certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golf Galaxy, Inc.;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: July 11, 2006 | /s/ RICHARD C. NORDVOLD   |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                     | Richard C. Nordvold       |   |
| * *                 | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of Insynergy Products, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of their knowledge, that:



1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2015 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |                                                     
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------
|                     |                                                     
|Dated:  May 19, 2015 | /s/Sanford Lang
Sanford Lang
Chief Executive Officer



|                    |                                                       
|------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|                    |                                                       
|Dated: May 19, 2015 | /s/Rachel Boulds
Rachel Boulds
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 360 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 360

 To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Onstad.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 2014

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Onstad.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Onstad, Crim. No. 13-65, pending in the 
        United States District Court for the District of Montana, the 
        prosecution has requested the production of testimony from Tom Lopach, 
        Chief of Staff for United States Senator Jon Tester;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current and former employees of the 
        Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony 
        relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Tom Lopach, Chief of Staff for United States Senator 
Jon Tester, and any other current or former employee of the Senator's 
office from whom relevant testimony may be sought, are authorized to 
testify in the case of United States v. Onstad, except concerning 
matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
current and former employees of Senator Tester's office in connection 
with the production of testimony authorized in section one of this 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT23.1. CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the following Registration Statements of our report dated January 25, 2002,except for Note 14, as to which the date is February 11, 2002, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements of SafeNet, Inc. and subsidiariesincluded in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

 

**Registration Statements on Form S-8**

 
| **Name**                                                                                                                                         |   | **Registration  Number** |   | **Date Filed**    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|-------------------|--------|
| SafeNet, Inc. 2001 Omnibus Stock Plan,  (Formerly 2000 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan)                                                           |   | 333-62584                |   | June 8, 2001      |   |
| SafeNet, Inc. 2000 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan                                                                                                |   | 333-50772                |   | November 28, 2000 |   |
| Information Resource Engineering, Inc. 2000   Nonqualified Stock Option Plan                                                                     |   | 333-43062                |   | August 4, 2000    |   |
| Information Resource Engineering, Inc. 1999 Employee   Stock Option Plan, 1999 Stock Bonus Plan, 1999   Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan |   | 333-91877                |   | December 1, 1999  |   |
| Information Resource Engineering, Inc. Stock Option Plan                                                                                         |   | 333-08343                |   | July 18, 1996     |   |

 

**Registration Statements on Form S-3**

 
| **Registration Number** |   | **Date Filed**    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------|--------|
| 333-93371               |   | December 22, 1999 |   |
| 333-90237               |   | November 3, 1999  |   |
| 333-04907               |   | May 31, 1996      |   |
| 033-94046               |   | August 18, 1995   |   |
| 033-94046               |   | June 28, 1995     |   |

 
|                     | **/s/ Ernst  & Young LLP** |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                     |                           |
| **Baltimore,  Maryland** |                           |
| **March 13,  2002**      |                           |

 

----
#### In the Matter of George Patterson, Doing Business under the Name of Franklyn Bar and Grill, Petitioner, against William O. Gulde et al., Constituting the Village Board of the Incorporated Village of Hempstead, Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

July 11, 1958.

*Halpern $ Halpern*for petitioner.

*Frederick G. Edel*for respondents.

Marcus G. Christ, J.

In this article 78 proceeding to compel the renewal of.the petitioner’s restaurant license by the respondent village, the return filed by the village wholly fails to set forth any findings by the Village Board to support their conclusion that the application should be denied.

It is incumbent upon them to inform the court of the basis for their decision to the end that it may be determined whether the decision is supported by the evidence. *(Moudis*v. *Macduff,*286 App. Div. 485.)

Accordingly, the matter is referred back to the Village Board to make findings and in the meantime the stay contained in the order to show cause is continued.

Short-form order signed.
IN REI'L Y REFER TO: 

1.A.2 (JELA) 

October 21, 2014 

Barbara Keeler 

EPA Region 6 

United States Department of the Interior 

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 

Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve 

New Orleans Jazz National Historical Park 

419 Decatur Street 

New Orleans, Louisiana 70130-1035 

Marine and Coastal Section 

1445 Ross Ave. 

Dallas, TX 75202-2733 

Re: Environmental Protection Agency Clean Water Act: Proposed Bayou aux Carpes Section 

404( c) Exemption for Entergy Louisiana, L.L.C. 

Dear Ms Keeler: 

We support the subject proposal by the EPA to extend coverage under the existing exception 

for routine operation and maintenance for the Southern Natural Gas Pipeline in the Bayou aux 

Carpes 404(c) area. As specified in the request from Entergy, the work would likely have only 

minimal and temporary effects on 0.003 acres of wetlands and would not likely be considered 

unacceptable. Further, the activities to be conducted are essentially the same as those 

envisioned under the Southern Natural Gas Pipeline exception, which was granted in the 1985 

EPA Bayou aux Carpes CW A Section 404( c) Final Determination. 

We would appreciate the EPA continuing to indicate to Entergy and others that the 

transmission and distribution lines in question are also in large part located on federal lands 

managed by the National Park Service as part of Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and 

Preserve. Entergy has an existing permit for operation and some maintenance of the 

transmission line in question, but the NPS has not determined whether or not the maintenance 

needs that we understand spurred the request for exemption could take place under that permit. 

Entergy has not yet requested that we do so, pending the outcome of your decision. 

We appreciate our ongoing partnership with the EPA in managing the Bayou aux Carpes 

404(c) area. Please contact Guy Hughes at 504-589-3882 x128 with any questions or 

concerns. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. 

Sincerely, 

nee atten 

Su(ntendcnt
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 08-2465 & 08-2466

_____________

SANDRA CORTEZ,

 Appellant in 08-2465

v.

TRANS UNION, LLC

SANDRA CORTEZ

v.

TRANS UNION, LLC,

 Appellant in 08-2466

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(Civ. No. 05-cv-5684)

District Judge: Hon. John P. Fullam

Before: McKee, Chief Judge, Hardiman and

 Van Antwerpen, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Slip Opinion filed in this case on August 13,

2010, be amended as follows:

On page 74 in footnote 37, the citation to “State Farm Mut. Auto.

Ins. Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 416 (3d Cir. 2003)” should be

changed to read as follows: “State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v.

Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 416 (2003).”
IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT,

/s/ Theodore A. McKee

Chief Judge

DATED: August 18, 2010

CRG/cc: All counsel of record