alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Juan Vasquez, Alias Juan Lozado, Defendant.

Court of General Sessions of County of New York,

March 3, 1959.

*Frank 8. Hogan, District Attorney (Peter J. O’Connor*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*Juan Vasquez,*defendant in person.

Thomas Dickens, J.

This motion in *coram nobis*instituted by defendant in person, attacks the validity of the sentence. I shall consider the substance of the application and disregard its label. *(People*v. *Culina,*5 Misc 2d 663; Eli Frank, Coram Nobis [Supp.], Errors of Law, pp. 20, 21.)

To sustain the merit of this application, defendant relies upon his complaint that it was illegal for the sentencing Judge to send him to the penitentiary for an indefinite term upon his plea of guilty interposed to an indictment charging him with criminally possessing a pistol after a prior conviction.

The alleged illegality is attributed to the remarks made by the sentencing Judge preliminarily to the imposition of the sentence. According to defendant’s interpretation, the remarks marked him as a “ hardened ” criminal; therefore, he contends, he did not qualify for confinement as an inmate in the penitentiary.

Defendant concedes that he has already served his sentence and that the other avenues for relief, that is, habeas corpus and appeal, are now foreclosed by the passing of time.

Without delving into an analysis of the remarks allegedly made by the sentencing Judge and their effect, if any, in view of the state of this record, I find as to the law that defendant’s failure to proceed in time to challenge the propriety of the sentence either by means of a writ of habeas corpus or by means of an appeal, precludes him, as a result of his delinquency, from receiving relief here, even if warranted. *(People ex rel. Kern [Gross]*v. *Silberglitt,*3 A D 2d 996, affd. 4 N Y 2d 59.) In *851any event, service of the sentence makes the question academic. *(People*v. *Burke,*13 Misc 2d 907, 908 [top].)

Motion denied.

The District Attorney is directed to enter an order in conformance with the decision herein and to forward a certified copy to defendant.
February 24, 1965

Hon. Ellis A. Oualllne, Jr. Opinion No. C-392 District Attorney Montgomery County Re: Whether criminal cases are Conroe, Texas properly transferrablebetween the Ninth and SecondNinth DisDear Mr. Oualline: trlct Courts.

By yowr .letterof January 22, 1965, you reque;;;$ an opinion of this office regarding the abovematter. cle 64, Vernon's Code of Criminal Procedure,provides:

"When two or more courtshave concurrent jurisdictionof any criminal offense, the court in which an Indictment or a complaint shall first' be filed shall retain jurisdictionof such offense to the exclusion of all other courts." This statute is intended to prevent any confusion or contentionwhich might arise between courts having concurrent jurisdictionsof the person and subjectmatter of the prosecution. Article 64 is a general statute. Cowleyv. State, 1.63 S.W.2d 193 (Tex.Crlm.1942) A specialact will prevail over a general law and will be treated as an exce - tion to the general law. A reading of Article 199,Vernon's Ci 11 S%tz% %~w~~~%! Perez v. Perez, the Ninth and SecondNinth Judicial DTstrict Courts are set up on a basis of concurrent jurisdiction. It Is therefore our opinion that In the absence of special legislation expressly providing for such transfer, criminal casesmay not be transferredbetween the two courts. Johnson v. State, 148 S.W. 300 (Tex.&lm. 1912); In re Drane 191 S W 115 6 1917); Wrenn 'v.State, 200 S.W. 844 (1918);Bra& ;. S.W.2d 365 (1928); a State, lnger v: State, 121 S.W.2d 364 (19381. As noted above, such transfermay be authorized by statute;Moore v. State, 35 S.W. 668 (Tex.Crim.1896); Cummings v. State; 35 S W 979 (Tex.Crlm.1896); Llttleton V. State, 239 S kd

. . 202 iTix.Crim.1922); Ehrlich v. State,

-1850-Hon. Ellis A. Oualline,Jr., Page 2 (C-392)

281 S.W. 548 (Tex.Crlm.1926). Rowever, there is no provision in Article 199, above, allowing transferbetween the two courts.

SUMMARY Criminal casesmay not be transferred between the Ninth and the SecondNinth Judicial District Courts. Yours very truly, WAGGONER CARR Attorney ffeneral

of Texas

## k-ihhqAssistant'AttorneyGeneral CBS/lb APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Sam Kelley Roy Johnson V. F. Taylor Bob Flowers APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Stanton Stone

-1851-
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SMART Modular Technologies (WWH), Inc. (the
“Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.




Iain
MacKenzie, the Chief Executive Officer and Barry Zwarenstein, the Chief
Financial Officer of SMART Modular Technologies (WWH), Inc., each certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Exchange Act; and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SMART
      Modular Technologies (WWH), Inc.







Date:
April 7, 2009






By:
                  /s/
      IAIN MACKENZIEName:
                  Iain
      MacKenzieTitle:
                  President
      and Chief Executive
Officer










By:
                  /s/
      BARRY ZWARENSTEINName:
                  Barry
      ZwarensteinTitle:
                  Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 80 (Thursday, April 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 24386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09849]

[[Page 24386]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, May 17, 2013.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of this or any future meetings change, an 
announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melissa D. Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

 Natise Stowe,
Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2013-09849 Filed 4-23-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
Base Salaries of Named Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.8 

BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 

On April 26, 2010, the Compensation & Organization Committee of the Board of Directors approved annual base salaries
for executive management effective July 1, 2010, increasing salaries in each case by the amount of the July 1, 2009 salary reduction announced on April 27, 2009. Effective July 1, 2010, the base salaries for our named executive officers will be as
follows: 
  

				
	 J. P. Surma
	  	$	1,260,000
	 J. H. Goodish
	  	$	750,000
	 G. R. Haggerty
	  	$	585,000
	 J. D. Garraux
	  	$	522,504
	 D. H. Lohr
	  	$	500,000

 The
named executive officers listed above are also provided the following perquisites: limited personal use of corporate aircraft and automobiles; lunch service supplement; club memberships; financial planning and tax preparation services; annual
physical examinations; a parking supplement; personal use of corporate properties; tickets to entertainment and sporting events; and, in the case of executives on foreign assignment, the services of a driver as well as security, housing and utility
benefits.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 227 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 227

To commemorate the 70th anniversary of the heroic rescue of Danish Jews 
           during the Second World War by the Danish people.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2013

Mr. Menendez submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To commemorate the 70th anniversary of the heroic rescue of Danish Jews 
           during the Second World War by the Danish people.

Whereas, in the fall of 1943, the Nazis occupied Denmark and issued orders that 
        the Danes deport all Danish Jews to concentration camps where the Jews 
        would eventually be exterminated;
Whereas the Danish people, as a result of the Nazi mandate, refused to accept 
        the prosecution of the Jews and began a mission of mercy on October 1, 
        1943, smuggling Jews across the Oresund Strait to neutral Sweden via 
        small boats and fishing cutters;
Whereas the Danish rescuers unselfishly risked their own lives, avoiding German 
        patrols for weeks during the rescue operations;
Whereas approximately 90 percent of the Danish Jews were saved from certain 
        death at the hands of the Nazis by the sheer courage and compassion 
        demonstrated by the Danes; and
Whereas it is imperative that future generations continue to remember and 
        understand what happened so that the horrors of the Holocaust will never 
        be repeated: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes and commemorates the bravery and valor of 
        those Danes who participated in the 1943 rescue operations that 
        saved the lives of 7,300 Jews who would otherwise have perished 
        in Nazi concentration camps; and
            (2) declares that the world owes a great debt to these 
        Danes who did not turn a blind eye on the dangers that faced 
        Jews under Nazi occupation and continue to serve as inspiration 
        to others in times of difficulties and challenges.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Alternative Fuels Americas, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J.
Bohannon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 18, 2012



| | /s/ Thomas J. Bohannon 
| | -----------------------
| | Thomas J. Bohannon     
| | Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report
of Solar America Corp. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian Barrilleaux, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2012, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |     |                                                         | 
|--------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: August 14, 2012 | By: | /s/ Brian Barrilleaux                                   | 
|                      |     | Brian Barrilleaux                                       | 
|                      |     | Principal Financial Officer
        Solar America Corp. |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

DANIEL LEE RATHMAN,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 30164

D.C. No. 1:09

- cr

- 00218

- BLW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2018 **

Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Daniel Lee Rathman appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 14

- month sentence imposed upon his third revocation of supervised

release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Rathman contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suit able for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 13 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 30164

the mitigating arguments he made in the district court in support of his request for

a six

- month sentence

. The court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United

States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of

the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) se ntencing factors and the totality of the circumstances,

including Rathman’s repeated violations of supervised release

. See Gall , 552 U.S.

at 51 ; see also United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062

- 63 (9th Cir. 2007)

.

Moreover, contrary to Rathman’s claim, the record reflects that the district court

considered his arguments for a below

- Guidelines sentence but found them

unpersuasive. See Rita v. United States , 551 U.S. 338, 358 (2007).

AFFIRMED

.
p0207_ex10-1f.htm


Exhibit 10.1(f)


 




PROXY


 


WHEREAS, Chi Lin Technology Co., Ltd. ("Chi Lin"), an entity of the Republic of China (Taiwan), doing business at No. 18, Sheng Li 1st Street, Jen Te Hsiang, Tainan County 71758, Taiwan, Republic of China, is the owner of 6,043,704 shares (the "InMedica Shares") of restricted common stock of InMedica Development Corporation, a Utah corporation ("InMedica"); and









WHEREAS, Larry Clark and Richard Bruggeman, former officers of InMedica, desire to acquire an irrevocable proxy to be able to vote the InMedica Shares owned by Chi Lin in any vote or consent of InMedica shareholders; and







THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged:







Chi Lin hereby appoints Larry Clark and Richard Bruggeman, and any successors of them, with full power of substitution, its proxy to vote the InMedica Shares for a period commencing with the date hereof through and including May 28, 2010, at any shareholders' meeting or any consent resolution of the shareholders of InMedica, without restriction except any vote by the proxies must be unanimous. This Proxy is coupled with an interest in that Clark and Bruggeman are creditors of InMedica and continue to forebear collection of amounts owing to them based on, among other things, this Proxy being granted to enhance their security for debts due to them.  Mr. Clark and Bruggeman agree that they will be responsible to report to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission any change in their beneficial ownership in InMedica caused by this Proxy, pursuant to the appropriate forms under Section 16A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Williams Act of the federal securities laws.







Dated the 28th day of January, 2010.




	 	 	 
	 	
CHI LIN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD 


	 

 	
  




/s/ Yeou-Geng Hsu 


	 	



	 	Yeou-Geng Hsu, President
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 354 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 354

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should leave 
 no member of the Armed Forces unaccounted for during the drawdown of 
                         forces in Afghanistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 11, 2014

   Mr. Toomey (for himself, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Burr, and Mr. Casey) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                           on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should leave 
 no member of the Armed Forces unaccounted for during the drawdown of 
                         forces in Afghanistan.

Whereas the United States is a country of great honor and integrity;
Whereas the United States has made a sacred promise to members of the Armed 
        Forces who are deployed overseas in defense of this country that their 
        sacrifice and service will never be forgotten; and
Whereas the United States can never thank the proud members of the Armed Forces 
        enough for what they do for this country on a daily basis: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) believes that the United States should undertake every 
        reasonable effort--
                    (A) to find and repatriate members of the Armed 
                Forces who are missing; and
                    (B) to repatriate members of the Armed Forces who 
                are captured;
            (2) believes that the United States has a responsibility to 
        keep the promises made to members of the Armed Forces who risk 
        their lives on a daily basis on behalf of the people of the 
        United States;
            (3) supports the United States Soldier's Creed and the 
        Warrior Ethos, which state that ``I will never leave a fallen 
        comrade''; and
            (4) believes that, while the United States continues to 
        transition leadership roles in combat operations in Afghanistan 
        to the people of Afghanistan, the United States must continue 
        to fulfill these important promises to any member of the Armed 
        Forces who is in a missing status or captured as a result of 
        service in Afghanistan now or in the future.
                                 <all>
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1 D 2 0 2 3

- 1449

_____________________________ L.T., father of L.S.T., Jr., and T.N.T., minor children

,
Appellant,

v.

F LORIDA D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES ,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County

. David J. Oberliesen , Judge

.

December 26, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.

D ISMISSED

. N.S.H. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fam. Servs. , 843 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 2003) (approving procedure that includes dismissal when, after counsel withdraws, the appellant fails to timely file his or her own brief in support of appeal of termination of parental rights)

.

R OBERTS , R OWE , and R AY , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

L.T., pro se

, Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, Children’s Legal Services , Tallahassee

, for Appellee ; Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Caitlin E. Burke, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem.
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Triton
Pacific Investment Corporation, Inc., (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Craig J. Faggen and Michael L. Carroll,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:







| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
        all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed
        in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                         |    |  |                                                            
|------------------------ | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                         |    |  |                                                            
|Dated: November 16, 2015 | By |  | /s/ Craig J. Faggen                                        
|                         |    |  | Craig J. Faggen
        
        Chief Executive Officer   
|                         |    |  |                                                            
|                         | By |  | /s/ Michael L. Carroll                                     
|                         |    |  | Michael L. Carroll
        
        Chief Financial Officer





46