alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.35 MB)

Tags:Alaska, Eielson Air Force Base, F-35, 354th Fighter Wing, Pacific Air Forces, Airmen, PACAF, F-35A Lightning II, Indo-PACOM, arctic survival 

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the  quarterly  report of Northern  Explorations,  Ltd. (the
Company)  on Form 10-Q for the  period  ended  September 30,  2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the  Report)  the
undersigned  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: Novmeber 23, 2009             /s/ KENNETH J. YONIKA
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Kenneth Yonika, Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to WHY USA and will be retained by
WHY USA and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4651

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL O. SHELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-95-105)

Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 25, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David W. Plowden, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville,

South Carolina, for Appellant. Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael O. Shell appeals the district court’s judgment

revoking his supervised release and imposing a prison term of

twenty-four months. Shell’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there were

no meritorious grounds for appeal but raising the issue of whether

the district court abused its discretion by revoking Shell’s

supervised release. Shell was advised of his right to file a pro

se supplemental brief but has declined to do so.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and conclude that

the district court did not abuse its discretion by revoking Shell’s

supervised release and imposing a prison sentence. See United

States v. Davis, 53 F.3d 638, 642 (4th Cir. 1995) (providing

standard of review). 

In accordance with the requirements of Anders, we have

reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no

meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the

revocation of Shell’s supervised release and his sentence. This

court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his

right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for

further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed,

but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then

counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from

representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof
- 3 -

was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.29 MB)

Tags:Environmental Management Program, DSCR, DLA Installation Operations Richmond, Virginia Wildlife

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
In the

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-23-00064-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF SAMANTHA YVETTE VALENZUELA

AND ANGEL EZAU VALENZUELA AND

IN THE INTEREST OF S.E.V., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. CC-23-339

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The appellant filed a motion with this Court seeking to voluntarily dismiss this appeal.1 

Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion is granted. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Scott E. Stevens

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: September 11, 2023

Date Decided: September 12, 2023

1Originally appealed to the Fourth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme 

Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23.1

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements of our report dated September 18, 2003, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Avatech Solutions, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2003.

Registration Statements on Form S-3:

Registration Number                    Date Filed

333-50426                              November 28, 2001

Registration Statements on Form S-8:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Registration Number      Name                                                  Date Filed
-------------------      ----                                                  ----------
<S>                   <C>                                                   <C>
333-14429                1996 Amended and Restated 1987 Stock Option Plan      October 18, 1996
                         1996 Equity Incentive Plan
                         1996 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan
                         Employee Stock Purchase Plan
333-56079                1996 Equity Incentive Plan                            June 4, 1998
                         Employee Stock Purchase Plan
333-59569                1998 Non-Officer Stock Option Plan                    July 22, 1998
333-85939                1996 Equity Incentive Plan                            August 26, 1999
                         Employee Stock Purchase Plan
                         1998 Non-Officer Stock Option Plan
333-107017               Restricted Stock Award Plan                           July 14, 2003
333-108354               2002 Stock Option Plan                                August 29, 2003
</TABLE>

Baltimore, Maryland
September 26, 2003
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00005

- CR

C ESAR A BRAM P ADILLA

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 213th District Court

of Tarrant County (1554757D)

February 14, 2019

Per Curiam

(nfp)

J UDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 11
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 11



SEVENTH GENERATION, INC.

Calculation of Shares Used in Determining
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Common Share


                                                    Year Ended December 31

                                                      1997          1996

Income available to common stockholders           (288,033)     (263,926)

Weighted average shares outstanding              2,428,791     2,428,791

Basic and diluted earnings per share               $ (0.12)      $ (0.11)

	The calculation above for diluted earnings per common share excludes the
potentially dilutive effect of both common stock equivalents (stock options
and warrants) and the impact of conversion of any debentures into the Company's
common stock since the impact would be anti-dilutive for both 1997 and 1996.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 01-4265



# 

M ICHAEL L EE S MITH ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CR-99-466-AMD)
Submitted: September 25, 2001

Decided: October 16, 2001

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL
James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Alexandra Natapoff, AssistantFederal Public Defender, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Stephen M. Schenning, United States Attorney, Jonathan P. Luna, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION

PER CURIAM:
Michael Lee Smith pled guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West 2000); he was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of fifty-one months. Smith reserved the right in his plea agreement to contest thedistrict court’s denial of his motion to suppress the fruits of a challenged search of his home. Finding no error, we affirm. Initially, Smith challenges the police practice of "knock and talk" when no probable cause or reasonable suspicion exists to question the residents of a dwelling. We find the officers’ conduct appropriate under the standard recognized by this court in United States v. Cephas , 254 F.3d 488, 494 (4th Cir. 2001).Smith next avers that Charlene Smith, his wife, did not give consent for the police to either enter the house or to search the house.Whether knowing and voluntary consent was given to search is a factual determination that is reversed on appeal only if clearly erroneous. United States v. Elie , 111 F.3d 1135, 1144 (4th Cir. 1997). The government must establish knowing and voluntary consent by a preponderance of the evidence, which is assessed under a "totality of the circumstances test." United States v. Latimore , 87 F.3d 647, 650 (4th Cir. 1996) (en banc). The district court’s determination of witness credibility is entitled to great deference. United States v. Murray , 65F.3d 1161, 1169 (4th Cir. 1995). In reviewing the totality of the circumstances surrounding the entry to the Smith residence and the search, as well as the district court’s credibility determination, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Mrs. Smith consented to the entry of the police officers and provided knowing and voluntary written consent for the search of the home. We therefore affirm Smith’s conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions of the parties are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. S MITH
EXHIBIT 32.1

August 10, 2012

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Tronox Limited (the Registrant) hereby certifies
that the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Thomas Casey       
|Thomas Casey           
|Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1

NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30,
2007 (the Report), I, James S. Quarforth, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ James S. QuarforthJames S. QuarforthChief Executive Officer, President andChairman of the Board of Directors


August 2, 2007
SERVED : FEBRUAR Y 1 , 201 2 

### :^:R^.RTMENTO F

^^::;Kh T OFERATiOi'i S i^\ l PE G - 2 P | : 5 0

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON . D C I N TH E MATTERO F 

### K.S . AVIATION , INC. , d/b/ aSierr aAcadem y o f Aeronautic s FA A DOCKE T No . [T O B E ASSIGNED l (Civi l Penalt y Case ) FDM S No . FAA-2011-048 3 

### ORDE RO FDISMISSA L On Jun e 13 , 2011 , th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant" ) fileda Complaint . On Jun e 2 , 2011 , K.S . Aviation , Inc . d/b/aSierr aAcademy of Aeronautic s ("Respondent" ) ha

dfile da.Rcques i fo

r Hearing . On January 31 . 2012 , Complainan t file d aMotio n t o Withdra w Complaint , citin g settlemen t o f th e matter . 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.21 5 states : "At any tim e before or

durin g ahearing , a

n agenc y attorne y ma

y withdra w acomplain t

o r part y ma y withdra w areques t

fo r ahearin g withou t th e consen t

of th e administrativ e la

w judge . I

f a n agenc y attorne y withdraw s th e complain t

o r apart y withdraw s th e reques t

fo r ahearin g andth e answer , th e administrativ e la w judg e shal l dismis s th e proceeding s unde r thi s subpar t wit h prejudice. " WHEREFORE , Complainant' s Motio n t o Withdra w Complain t havin g bee n read an dconsidered , i

t i s ORDERE D a s follows : Complainant' s Motio n to Withdraw Complain t b e andi s hereb y granted ; and2 . Thi s proceedin g h e an di s hereb y dismisse dwit h preiudicc .

RichardC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e La

w Judg e Attachment s - Servic e Lis tFDM S No . FAA-2 0 II-048 3 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbur^Wrigh t

Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON E COP Y Cyri l L . Lawrence , Responden t '. v Counse l Cyri l Lawrence , Inc . 211 1 K Stree t Merced , C A 9534 0 TEL : 209-383-685 4 FAX : 209-383-685 6 Lierr e Green , CompJaina)) ! ' s Coioise l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacifi c Reoion , AWP-7. 6 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-711 7 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Adminisirafiv e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX . 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mui

l Fo r service i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier, use tlic followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Adininistralion , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.

W, Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington . D

C 20591 : Anenlion : Hearin g Docke t Clerk . AGC-430 . - 2 -
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 8 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 8

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue 
 Service of the Department of the Treasury relating to taxable medical 
                                devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2013

  Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue 
 Service of the Department of the Treasury relating to taxable medical 
                                devices.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service of the Department of the 
Treasury relating to taxable medical devices (published at 77 Fed. Reg. 
72924 (December 7, 2012)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```