Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 77 / Tuesday, April 22, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 22415 

(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and 

vessels are prohibited from entering, 

transiting through, anchoring in, or 

remaining within the regulated area 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port Charleston or a designated 

representative. 

(2) Persons and vessels desiring to 

enter, transit through, anchor in, or 

remain within the regulated area may 

contact the Captain of the Port 

Charleston by telephone at 843–740– 

7050, or a designated representative via 

VHF radio on channel 16, to request 

authorization. If authorization to enter, 

transit through, anchor in, or remain 

within the regulated area is granted by 

the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative, all persons 

and vessels receiving such authorization 

must comply with the instructions of 

the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative. 

(3) The Coast Guard will provide 

notice of the regulated area by Local 

Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners, and on-scene designated 

representatives. 

(d) Effective date. This rule is 

effective on May 4, 2014. This rule will 

be enforced from 7:30 a.m. until 8:15 

a.m. on Sunday, May 4, 2014. 

Dated: April 4, 2014. 

R.R. Rodriguez, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Charleston. 

[FR Doc. 2014–09060 Filed 4–21–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2013–0320] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone, Chicago Harbor, Navy 

Pier Southeast, Chicago, IL 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of 

regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce 

the Navy Pier Southeast Safety Zone 

within the Chicago Harbor during 

specified periods from May 24, 2014, 

through January 1, 2015. This action is 

necessary and intended to ensure safety 

of life on the navigable waters of the 

United States immediately prior to, 

during, and immediately after various 

firework events. During the enforcement 

periods listed below, no person or 

vessel may enter the safety zone without 

permission of the Captain of the Port, 

Lake Michigan. 

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 

165.931 will be enforced at specified 

times between 10 p.m. on May 24, 2014, 

through 12:30 a.m. on January 1, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this notice, call 

or email MST1 John Ng, Waterways 

Management Division, Marine Safety 

Unit Chicago, telephone 630–986–2122, 

email address john.h.ng@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast 

Guard will enforce the Safety Zone; 

Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier Southeast, 

Chicago, IL listed in 33 CFR 165.931, on 

each Saturday from 10 p.m. until 10:30 

p.m. and each Wednesday from 9:15 

p.m. until 9:45 p.m. during the period 

starting May 24, 2014, through August 

30, 2014. Additionally, on the dates 

below during this period, this safety 

zone will be enforced with the following 

adjustments in times: 

• Friday, July 4, 2014, from 9:15 p.m. 

until 10 p.m.; 

• Saturday, August 9, 2014, from 9:15 

p.m. until 9:45 p.m.; 

• Saturday, October 25, 2014, from 9 

p.m. until 10:30 p.m.; and 

• Wednesday, December 31, 2014, 

from 11:45 p.m. until 12:30 a.m. on 

Thursday, January 1, 2015. 

This safety zone encompasses the 

waters of Lake Michigan within Chicago 

Harbor bounded by coordinates 

beginning at 41°53′26.5′′ N, 087°35′26.5′′ 

W; then south to 41°53′7.6′′ N, 

087°35′26.3′′ W; then west to 41°53′7.6′′ 

N, 087°36′23.2′′ W; then north to 

41°53′26.5′′ N, 087°36′24.6′′ W; then east 

back to the point of origin (NAD 83). All 

vessels must obtain permission from the 

Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or 

his on-scene representative to enter, 

move within or exit the safety zone. 

Vessels and persons granted permission 

to enter the safety zone shall obey all 

lawful orders or directions of the 

Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or 

his on-scene representative. 

This notice is issued under authority 

of 33 CFR 165.931 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). 

In addition to this notice in the Federal 

Register, the Coast Guard will provide 

the maritime community with advance 

notification of these enforcement 

periods via broadcast Notice to Mariners 

or Local Notice to Mariners. If the 

Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, 

determines that the safety zone need not 

be enforced for the full duration stated 

in this notice, he may use a Broadcast 

Notice to Mariners to grant general 

permission to enter the safety zone. The 

Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or 

his on-scene representative may be 

contacted via VHF Channel 16. 

Dated: April 10, 2014. 

K.M. Moser, 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting 

Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan. 

[FR Doc. 2014–09058 Filed 4–21–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0464; FRL–9909–50– 

Region–5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Wisconsin; Redesignation of the 

Milwaukee-Racine 2006 24-Hour Fine 

Particle Nonattainment Area to 

Attainment 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving Wisconsin’s 

request to redesignate the MilwaukeeRacine, Wisconsin nonattainment area 

(Milwaukee, Racine and Waukesha 

Counties) to attainment for the 2006 24- 

hour National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS or standard) for fine 

particulate matter (PM2.5) because the 

request meets the statutory requirements 

for redesignation under the Clean Air 

Act (CAA). The Wisconsin Department 

of Natural Resources (WDNR) submitted 

this request to EPA on June 8, 2012, and 

supplemented it on May 30, 2013. EPA’s 

approval involves several related 

actions. EPA is making a determination 

that the Milwaukee-Racine area has 

attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5

standard. EPA is approving, as a 

revision to the Wisconsin state 

implementation plan (SIP), the state’s 

plan for maintaining the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS through 2025 in the area. 

EPA is also approving the 

comprehensive emissions inventories 

submitted by WDNR for Nitrogen 

Oxides (NOX), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), 

primary PM2.5, Volatile Organic 

Compounds (VOC), and ammonia as 

meeting the requirements of the CAA. 

Finally, EPA finds adequate and is 

approving Wisconsin’s direct PM2.5, 

SO2, NOX and VOC Motor Vehicle 

Emission Budgets (MVEBs) for 2020 and 

2025 for the Milwaukee-Racine area. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

April 22, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0464. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
22416 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 77 / Tuesday, April 22, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

1Fine particulates directly emitted by sources 

and not formed in a secondary manner through 

chemical reactions or other processes in the 

atmosphere. 

2NOX and SO2 are precursors for fine particulates 

through chemical reactions and other related 

processes in the atmosphere. 

the www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone Gilberto 

Alvarez, Environmental Scientist, at 

(312 886–6143 before visiting the 

Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gilberto Alvarez, Environmental 

Scientist, Attainment Planning and 

Maintenance Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 

60604, (312) 886–6143, 

alvarez.gilberto@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What is the background for the actions? 

II. What actions is EPA taking? 

III. What is EPA’s response to comments? 

IV. Why is EPA taking these actions? 

V. Final Action 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is the background for the 

actions? 

On June 8, 2012, WDNR submitted its 

request to redesignate the MilwaukeeRacine, Wisconsin nonattainment area 

(Milwaukee, Racine and Waukesha 

Counties) to attainment for the 2006 24- 

hour PM2.5 NAAQS, and for EPA 

approval of the SIP revision containing 

an emissions inventory and a 

maintenance plan for the area. WDNR 

supplemented its submission on May 

30, 2013. On February 18, 2014, EPA 

published a proposed rule (79 FR 9134) 

making a determination that the 

Milwaukee-Racine area is attaining the 

2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard and that 

the area has met the requirements for 

redesignation under section 107(d)(3)(E) 

of the CAA. 

II. What actions is EPA taking? 

EPA has determined that the 

Milwaukee-Racine area has attained and 

continues to attain the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 standard, that the area has 

attained this standard by the applicable 

attainment date, and that the area meets 

the requirements for redesignation 

under section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA. 

EPA proposed this determination based 

on monitoring data showing attainment 

of the standard for the 2008–2010, 

2009–2011, 2010–2012 and 2013 time 

periods. Monitoring data for 2013 show 

that the area continues to attain the 

standard. Because the area continues to 

attain the standard and meets all other 

requirements for redesignation under 

CAA section 107(d)(3)(E), EPA is 

approving the request from Wisconsin 

to change the legal designation of the 

Milwaukee-Racine area from 

nonattainment to attainment for the 

2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. 

EPA is taking several actions related 

to Wisconsin’s PM2.5 redesignation 

request, as discussed below. 

EPA is approving, pursuant to CAA 

section 175A, Wisconsin’s 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 maintenance plan for the 

Milwaukee-Racine area as a revision to 

the Wisconsin SIP (such approval being 

one of the CAA criteria for redesignation 

to attainment status). The maintenance 

plan is designed to keep the MilwaukeeRacine area in attainment of the 2006 

24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS through 2025. 

EPA is approving, pursuant to CAA 

section 172(c)(3), both the 2006 

emission inventories for primary PM2.5,1

NOX, VOC and SO2,2 and the 2007 

emission inventory for ammonia. These 

emission inventories satisfy the 

requirement in section 172(c)(3) of the 

CAA for a comprehensive, current 

emission inventory. 

Finally, for transportation conformity 

purposes EPA finds adequate and is 

approving Wisconsin’s direct PM2.5, 

SO2, NOX and VOC MVEBs for 2020 and 

2025 for the Milwaukee-Racine area. 

III. What is EPA’s response to 

comments? 

EPA received no adverse comments 

on the February 18, 2014, proposal. EPA 

received four comments in support of 

the February 18, 2014, proposal from: 

(1) Harold Pederson, a private citizen, 

(2) the WDNR, (3) Eric Bott, with the 

Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce 

organization and (4) five members of the 

United States Congressional delegation 

from Wisconsin. 

In addition, EPA would like to correct 

two of the 98th Percentile values within 

Table 1 on page 9136 of the proposed 

rule (79 FR 9134). The value (in 

micrograms per cubic meter) for 2013 

for monitor number 550790026 which is 

currently listed as 19.0 should be 

changed to 21.2. The value for 2013 for 

monitor number 550790099 which is 

currently 19.7 should be changed to 

20.5. The original values were entered 

incorrectly due to a calculation error. 

EPA notes that both of these corrected 

values are still below the NAAQS and 

do not impact the overall outcome of the 

redesignation. 

IV. Why is EPA taking these actions? 

EPA has determined that the 

Milwaukee-Racine area has attained and 

continues to attain the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS and that the area has 

attained this standard by its applicable 

attainment date. EPA has also 

determined that all other criteria have 

been met for the redesignation of the 

Milwaukee-Racine area from 

nonattainment to attainment of the 2006 

24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS and for approval 

of Wisconsin’s maintenance plan for the 

area. See CAA sections 107(d)(3)(E) and 

175A. The detailed rationale for EPA’s 

findings and actions is set forth in the 

proposed rulemaking of February 18, 

2014 (79 FR 9134), and in this final 

rulemaking. 

V. Final Action 

EPA is making a determination that 

the Milwaukee-Racine area has attained 

the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard by its 

attainment date and that the area 

continues to attain the standard. EPA 

has determined that the area has met the 

requirements for redesignation under 

section 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A of the 

CAA. EPA is thus approving the request 

from Wisconsin to change the legal 

designation of the Milwaukee-Racine 

area from nonattainment to attainment 

for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. 

EPA is also approving Wisconsin’s 

PM2.5 maintenance plan for the 

Milwaukee-Racine area as a revision to 

the Wisconsin SIP, because the plan 

meets the requirements of section 175A 

of the CAA. EPA is approving the 

comprehensive emissions inventories 

submitted by WDNR for NOX, SO2, 

primary PM2.5, VOC, and ammonia as 

meeting the requirements of the CAA. 

Finally, EPA finds adequate and is 

approving Wisconsin’s direct PM2.5, 

SO2, NOX and VOC MVEBs for 2020 and 

2025 for the Milwaukee-Racine area. 

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d), 

EPA finds there is good cause for these 

actions to become effective immediately 

upon publication. This is because a 

delayed effective date is unnecessary 

due to the nature of a redesignation to 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 77 / Tuesday, April 22, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 22417 

attainment, which relieves the area from 

certain CAA requirements that would 

otherwise apply to it. The immediate 

effective date for this action is 

authorized under both 5 U.S.C. 

553(d)(1), which provides that 

rulemaking actions may become 

effective less than 30 days after 

publication if the rule ‘‘grants or 

recognizes an exemption or relieves a 

restriction,’’ and section 553(d)(3) 

which allows an effective date less than 

30 days after publication ‘‘as otherwise 

provided by the agency for good cause 

found and published with the rule.’’ 

The purpose of the 30-day waiting 

period prescribed in section 553(d) is to 

give affected parties a reasonable time to 

adjust their behavior and prepare before 

the final rule takes effect. Today’s rule, 

however, does not create any new 

regulatory requirements such that 

affected parties would need time to 

prepare before the rule takes effect. 

Rather, today’s rule relieves the state of 

planning requirements for the 

Milwaukee-Racine 24-hour PM2.5

nonattainment area. For these reasons, 

EPA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 

553(d)(3) for these actions to become 

effective on the date of publication of 

these actions. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, redesignation of an 

area to attainment and the 

accompanying approval of a 

maintenance plan under section 

107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the 

status of a geographical area and do not 

impose any additional regulatory 

requirements on sources beyond those 

imposed by state law. A redesignation to 

attainment does not in and of itself 

create any new requirements, but rather 

results in the applicability of 

requirements contained in the CAA for 

areas that have been redesignated to 

attainment. Moreover, the Administrator 

is required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, these actions 

merely do not impose additional 

requirements beyond those imposed by 

state law and the CAA. For that reason, 

these actions: 

• Are not ‘‘significant regulatory 

actions’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• do not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• are certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• do not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• do not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• are not economically significant 

regulatory actions based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• are not significant regulatory 

actions subject to Executive Order 

13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); 

• are not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• do not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because a 

determination of attainment is an action 

that affects the status of a geographical 

area and does not impose any new 

regulatory requirements on tribes, 

impact any existing sources of air 

pollution on tribal lands, nor impair the 

maintenance of particulate matter 

national ambient air quality standards 

in tribal lands. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

These actions are not ‘‘major rules’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by June 23, 2014. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of these actions for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. These actions may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce their requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2)) 

List of Subjects 

40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Particulate matter. 

40 CFR Part 81 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, National parks, 

Wilderness areas. 

Dated: April 4, 2014. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended 

as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. Section 52.2584 is amended by 

adding paragraphs (d) and (e) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.2584 Control strategy; Particulate 

matter. 

* * * * * 

(d) Approval—On April 22, 2014, 

EPA approved the 2006 24-Hour PM2.5

maintenance plan for the MilwaukeeRacine nonattainment area (Milwaukee, 

Racine and Waukesha Counties), as 

submitted on June 8, 2012. The 

maintenance plan establishes 2020 

motor vehicle emissions budgets for the 

Milwaukee-Racine area of 2.33 tons per 

winter day 1 (tpwd) and 2.16 tpwd 

direct PM2.5 and 32.62 tpwd and 28.69 

tpwd NOX for the years 2020 and 2025, 

respectively. 

(e) Approval—On April 22, 2014, EPA 

approved the 2006 24-hour PM2.5

comprehensive emissions inventories 

for the Milwaukee-Racine area 

(Milwaukee, Racine and Waukesha 

Counties). Wisconsin’s 2006 NOX, 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
22418 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 77 / Tuesday, April 22, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

directly emitted PM2.5, SO2, VOC, as 

well as the 2007 supplemental ammonia 

emissions inventory satisfies the 

emission inventory requirements of 

section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act for 

the Milwaukee-Racine area. 

PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS 

FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

PURPOSES 

■ 3. The authority citation for part 81 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. 

■ 4. Section 81.350 is amended by 

revising the entry for MilwaukeeRacine, WI in the table entitled 

‘‘Wisconsin—PM2.5 [24-Hour NAAQS]’’ 

to read as follows: 

§ 81.350 Wisconsin. 

* * * * * 

WISCONSIN—PM2.5

[24-Hour NAAQS] 

Designated area 

Designation for the 1997 NAAQSa Designation for the 2006 NAAQSa

Date 1 Type Date 2 Type 

Milwaukee-Racine, WI: 

Milwaukee County .......................................................

Racine County 

Waukesha County 

.................... Unclassifiable/Attainment April 22, 2014 Attainment. 

*******

a Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified. 

1This date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted. 

2This date is 30 days after November 13, 2009, unless otherwise noted. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–08613 Filed 4–21–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0791; FRL–9908–83] 

Linuron; Pesticide Tolerances; 

Technical Correction 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule; technical correction. 

SUMMARY: EPA issued a final rule in the 

Federal Register of February 12, 2014, 

concerning the establishment of 

tolerances for residues of linuron in or 

on multiple commodities and the 

removal of a tolerance with regional 

registrations in or on parsley leaves. 

This document corrects an error in the 

listing of the registrant associated with 

this action. 

DATES: This final rule correction is 

effective April 22, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0791, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. The Public Reading 

Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 

p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 

legal holidays. The telephone number 

for the Public Reading Room is (202) 

566–1744, and the telephone number for 

the OPP Docket is (703) 305–5805. 

Please review the visitor instructions 

and additional information about the 

docket available at http://www.epa.gov/ 

dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois 

Rossi, Registration Division (7505P), 

Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

(703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Does this action apply to me? 

The Agency included in the final rule 

published in the Federal Register of 

February 12, 2014 (79 FR 8301) (FRL– 

9905–22) a list of those who may be 

potentially affected by this action. 

II. What does this technical correction 

do? 

EPA issued a final rule in the Federal 

Register of February 12, 2014, that 

established tolerances for residues of 

linuron in or on multiple commodities 

and removed a tolerance with regional 

registrations in or on parsley leaves. 

EPA inadvertently listed the incorrect 

registrant associated with this action as 

Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, in Unit 

II. Summary of Petitioned-for Tolerance. 

The correct registrant associated with 

this action is Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. 

The same incorrect registrant’s name 

appears in the notice of receipt 

associated with this regulatory action, 

which published in the Federal Register 

of November 7, 2012 (77 FR 66832) 

(FRL–9523–9). 

The preamble for FR Doc. 2014– 

03077, published in the Federal 

Register of February 12, 2014 (79 FR 

8301) is corrected as follows: 

On page 8302, under the heading ‘‘II. 

Summary of Petitioned-for Tolerance,’’ 

second column, first full paragraph, line 

22, correct ‘‘Syngenta Crop Protection, 

LLC’’ to read ‘‘Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc.’’. 

III. Why is this correction issued as a 

final rule? 

Section 553 of the Administrative 

Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 

553(b)(3)(B)) provides that, when an 

agency for good cause finds that notice 

and public procedure are impracticable, 

unnecessary, or contrary to the public 

interest, the agency may issue a final 

rule without providing notice and an 

opportunity for public comment. EPA 

has determined that there is good cause 

for making this technical correction 

final without prior proposal and 

opportunity for comment, because the 

technical amendment serves only to 

correct the registrant that is listed as 

having prepared a summary of the 

petition associated with the final rule. 

EPA finds that this constitutes good 

cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). 

IV. Do any of the statutory and 

Executive Order reviews apply to this 

action? 

No. For a detailed discussion 

concerning the statutory and executive 

order review, refer to ‘‘Unit VII. 

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews’’ 

of the February 12, 2014 final rule. 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES