Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Notices 9891 

1See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from 

the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the 

First Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order, 76 FR 77772 (December 14, 2011) 

(‘‘Final Results’’). 

OMB Control Number: 0648–0376. 

Form Number(s): NA. 

Type of Request: Regular submission 

(extension of a current information 

collection). 

Number of Respondents: 923. 

Average Hours per Response: 

Implementation plans, 6,634 hours; 

state approval/buyback, 270 hours; 

advance and post referenda, bids and 

buyer annual reports and seller/buyer 

reports, 4 hours each; fish tickets, 10 

minutes; buyer monthly reports, 2 

hours; advisements of conflict in 

ownership claims, 10 hours. 

Burden Hours: 18,922. 

Needs and Uses: This request is for an 

extension of a current information 

collection. 

NOAA has established a program to 

reduce excess fishing capacity by paying 

fishermen to (1) surrender their fishing 

permits or (2) surrender their permits, 

and either scrap their vessels or restrict 

vessel titles to prevent fishing. These 

fishing capacity reduction programs, or 

buybacks, can be funded by a Federal 

loan to the industry or by direct Federal 

or other funding. These buybacks are 

conducted pursuant to the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and 

Management Act, and the MagnusonStevens Reauthorization Act (Pub. L. 

109–479). The regulations implementing 

the buybacks are at 50 CFR part 600. 

Depending upon the type of buyback 

involved, the program can entail the 

submission of buyback requests by 

industry, the submission of bids, 

referenda of fishery participants, and 

reporting of the collection of fees to 

repay a Federal loan. For buybacks 

involving State-managed fisheries, the 

State may need to develop the buyback 

plan and comply with other information 

requirements. The information collected 

by NMFS is required to request a 

buyback, submit supporting data for 

requested buybacks, to submit bids, and 

to conduct referenda of fishery 

participants. 

The recordkeeping and reporting 

requirements at 50 CFR 600.1013 

through 600.1017 form the basis for this 

collection of information on fee 

payment and collection. NMFS requests 

information from participating buyback 

participants. This information, upon 

receipt, tracks the repayment of the 

Federal loans that are issued as part of 

the buybacks, and ensures accurate 

management and monitoring of the 

loans during the repayment term. 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. 

Frequency: Annually, monthly and on 

occasion. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Required to 

obtain or maintain benefits. 

OMB Desk Officer: 

OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. 

Copies of the above information 

collection proposal can be obtained by 

calling or writing Jennifer Jessup, 

Departmental Paperwork Clearance 

Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of 

Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 

JJessup@doc.gov). 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to 

OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. 

Dated: February 15, 2012. 

Gwellnar Banks, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3932 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–937] 

Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Amended Final Results of the First 

Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 14, 2011, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published the final 

results of the first administrative review 

of the antidumping duty order on citric 

acid and certain citrate salts (‘‘citric 

acid’’) from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’).1 The period of review is 

November 20, 2008, through April 30, 

2010. We are amending our Final 

Results to correct a ministerial error 

made in the calculation of the 

antidumping duty margin for Yixing 

Union Biochemical Co., Ltd. (‘‘Yixing 

Union’’) pursuant to section 751(h) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’). 

DATES: Effective Date: February 21, 

2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Krisha Hill or Maisha Cryor, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 4, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington DC, 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4037 or (202) 482– 

5831, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 19, 2011, Yixing Union 

timely submitted an allegation of a 

ministerial error with respect to the 

Final Results of the November 20, 2008, 

through April 30, 2010, administrative 

review, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(c)(ii). No other party submitted 

comments regarding ministerial error 

allegations. 

Ministerial Errors 

A ministerial error as defined in 

section 751(h) of the Act includes 

‘‘errors in addition, subtraction, or other 

arithmetic function, clerical error 

resulting from inaccurate copying, 

duplication, or the like, and any other 

type of unintentional error which the 

administering authority considers 

ministerial.’’ See also 19 CFR 351.224(f). 

After analyzing Yixing Union’s 

comments, we have determined, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(e), that 

a ministerial error existed in a certain 

calculation in the Final Results. 

Specifically, the Department 

inadvertently applied marine insurance 

to all, rather than a portion, of Yixing 

Union’s U.S. sales. Correction of this 

error results in a change to Yixing 

Union’s final antidumping duty margin. 

For a detailed discussion of this 

ministerial error, as well as the 

Department’s analysis, see Final Results 

of the 2008–2010 Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

for Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Allegation of Ministerial Error, dated 

concurrently with this notice. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), 

we are amending the Final Results of the 

administrative review of citric acid from 

the PRC. Listed below is the revised 

weighted-average dumping margin 

resulting from these amended final 

results: 

Exporter 

Original 

final 

margin 

Amended 

final 

margin 

Yixing Union Biochemical Co., Ltd. 1.11% 1.01% 

Disclosure 

We will disclose the calculation 

performed for these amended final 

results within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice to interested 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

9892 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Notices 

1Petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi 

Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Inc. and Toray Plastics 

(America), Inc. 

parties in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Assessment Rate 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the 

Department will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with these 

amended final results of review. For 

assessment purposes, we calculated 

importer (or customer)-specific 

assessment rates for merchandise 

subject to this review consistent with 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where appropriate, 

we calculated an ad valorem rate for 

each importer (or customer) by dividing 

the total dumping margins for reviewed 

sales to that party by the total entered 

values associated with those 

transactions. For duty-assessment rates 

calculated on this basis, we will direct 

CBP to assess the resulting ad valorem 

rate against the entered customs values 

for the subject merchandise. Where 

appropriate, we calculated a per-unit 

rate for each importer (or customer) by 

dividing the total dumping margins for 

reviewed sales to that party by the total 

sales quantity associated with those 

transactions. For duty-assessment rates 

calculated on this basis, we will direct 

CBP to assess the resulting per-unit rate 

against the entered quantity of the 

subject merchandise. Where an importer 

(or customer)-specific assessment rate is 

de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), 

the Department will instruct CBP to 

assess that importer’s (or customer’s) 

entries of subject merchandise without 

regard to antidumping duties, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

The Court of International Trade has 

issued a preliminary injunction 

enjoining the liquidation of certain 

entries during the period of review, 

therefore, assessment instructions will 

be issued as appropriate. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective 

retroactively on any entries made on or 

after December 14, 2011, the date of 

publication of the Final Results, for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided for by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

Yixing Union, the cash deposit rate will 

be the amended final margin rate shown 

above in the ‘‘Ministerial Errors’’ section 

of this notice; (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that have 

separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the exporter-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

for all PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the PRCwide rate of 156.87 percent; and (4) for 

all non-PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporters that supplied that non-PRC 

exporter. These deposit requirements 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

These amended final results are 

published in accordance with sections 

751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 10, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3971 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–825] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip from India: Preliminary Intent 

to Rescind Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 21, 

2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni 

Page, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–1398. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2011, the Department of 

Commerce (Department) published a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet 

and strip from India covering the period 

January 1, 2010, through December 31, 

2010. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 76 

FR 38609, 38610 (July 1, 2011). The 

Department received a timely request 

from Petitioners 1 for a CVD 

administrative review of five 

companies: Ester Industries Limited 

(Ester), Garware Polyester Ltd. 

(Garware), Jindal Poly Films Limited of 

India (Jindal), Polyplex Corporation Ltd. 

(Polyplex), and SRF Limited (SRF). The 

Department also received timely 

requests for a CVD review from Vacmet 

India Ltd. (Vacmet) and Polypacks 

Industries of India (Polypacks). 

On August 26, 2011, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of 

administrative review with respect to 

Ester, Garware, Jindal, Polyplex, SRF, 

Vacmet, and Polypacks. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 53404 

(August 26, 2011). Subsequently, 

Vacmet and Polypacks timely withdrew 

their requests for an administrative 

review; on September 20, 2011, the 

Department published a rescission, in 

part, of the CVD administrative review 

with respect to Vacmet and Polypacks. 

See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet and Strip From India: Rescission, 

In Part, of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review, 76 FR 58248 

(September 20, 2011). 

On September 12, 2011, SRF filed a 

certification of no shipments and 

requested that the Department rescind 

the CVD administrative review of the 

company. 

On November 25, 2011, Petitioners 

timely withdrew their request for CVD 

administrative reviews of Ester, 

Garware, Polyplex, and Jindal. The 

Department published a rescission, in 

part, of the CVD administrative review 

with respect to Ester, Garware, Polyplex, 

and Jindal on January 11, 2012. See 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip From India: Rescission, In 

Part, of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review, 77 FR 1668 

(January 11, 2012). The administrative 

review of SRF continued. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

all gauges of raw, pretreated, or primed 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet 

and strip, whether extruded or 

coextruded. Excluded are metallized 

films and other finished films that have 

had at least one of their surfaces 

modified by the application of a 

performance-enhancing resinous or 

inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 

inches thick. Imports of polyethylene 

terephthalate film, sheet and strip are 

classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES