12228 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 29, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

statement should notify Ce ́sar Cordero 

by email at cordero.cesar@epa.gov no 

later than April 20, 2012. Individuals 

that have scientific data that they would 

like EPA to consider during regulatory 

review of the uncovered finished water 

reservoir requirement are encouraged to 

email their data to Ce ́sar Cordero. It 

would be helpful to have the data in 

advance of the public meeting. 

Registration: Individuals planning to 

participate in the public meeting must 

register for the meeting by email at 

LT2Aprilmeeting@epa.gov no later than 

April 20, 2012. Teleconferencing will be 

available for individuals unable to 

attend the meeting in person. EPA will 

do its best to include all those 

interested, but may have to limit 

attendance due to room and/or 

teleconference size limitations and 

therefore urges people to register early. 

When registering, please include your 

full name, organization, phone number, 

and email address in the body of the 

email message and indicate whether you 

would be participating in person or via 

teleconference. Teleconference 

information will be emailed to 

registered participants in advance of the 

meeting. 

Special Accommodations: For 

information on access or 

accommodations for individuals with 

disabilities, please contact Jini Mohanty 

at (202) 564–5269 or by email at 

mohanty.jini@epa.gov. Please allow at 

least five business days prior to the 

meeting to give EPA time to process 

your request. 

Dated: February 24, 2012. 

Cynthia C. Dougherty, 

Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking 

Water. 

[FR Doc. 2012–4825 Filed 2–28–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 271 

[EPA–R10–RCRA–2011–0973; FRL–9633–8] 

Idaho: Proposed Authorization of State 

Hazardous Waste Management 

Program; Revision 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: Idaho has applied to EPA for 

final authorization of certain changes to 

its hazardous waste program under the 

Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act, as amended (RCRA). RCRA allows 

EPA to authorize State hazardous waste 

management programs if EPA finds that 

such programs are equivalent to and 

consistent with the Federal program and 

provide adequate enforcement of 

compliance. EPA has reviewed Idaho’s 

application, has preliminarily 

determined these changes satisfy all 

requirements needed to qualify for final 

authorization, and is proposing to 

authorize the State’s changes. 

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule 

must be received on or before March 30, 

2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10– 

RCRA–2011–0973 by one of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: kocourek.nina@epa.gov. 

• Mail: Nina Kocourek, U.S. EPA, 

Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 

900, Mail Stop AWT–122, Seattle, 

Washington 98101. 

• Hand Delivery: Nina Kocourek, U.S. 

EPA, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, 

Suite 900, Mail Stop AWT–122, Seattle, 

Washington 98101. Such deliveries are 

only accepted during the normal 

business hours of operation; special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R10–RCRA–2011– 

0973. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the EPA Region 10 Library, 1200 Sixth 

Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, Washington 

98101. The EPA Region 10 Library is 

open from 9 a.m. to noon, and 1 to 

4 p.m. Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The EPA 

Region 10 Library telephone number is 

(206) 553–1289. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nina Kocourek, U.S. EPA, Region 10, 

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Mail 

Stop AWT–122, Seattle, Washington 

98101, email: kocourek.nina@epa.gov, 

phone number (206) 553–6502. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Proposed Authorization Revision 

A. Why are revisions to State programs 

necessary? 

States which have received final 

authorization from EPA under RCRA 

section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must 

maintain a hazardous waste program 

that is equivalent to, consistent with, 

and no less stringent than the Federal 

program. As the Federal program 

changes, States must change their 

programs and ask EPA to authorize their 

changes. Changes to State programs may 

be necessary when Federal or State 

statutory or regulatory authority is 

modified or when certain other changes 

occur. Most commonly, States must 

change their programs because of 

changes to EPA’s regulations codified in 

Title 40 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260 

through 268, 270, 273, and 279. 

B. What decisions have we made in this 

proposed rule concerning 

authorization? 

EPA has preliminarily determined 

that Idaho’s application to revise its 

authorized program meets all of the 

statutory and regulatory requirements 

established by RCRA. Therefore, we are 

proposing to grant Idaho final 

authorization to operate its hazardous 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 29, 2012 / Proposed Rules 12229 

waste management program with the 

changes described in the authorization 

application. Idaho will have 

responsibility for permitting Treatment, 

Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) 

within its borders (except in Indian 

country) and for carrying out the aspects 

of the RCRA program described in its 

revised program application, subject to 

the limitations of the Hazardous and 

Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 

(HSWA). New Federal requirements and 

prohibitions imposed by Federal 

regulations that EPA promulgates under 

the authority of HSWA, and which are 

not less stringent than existing 

requirements, take effect in authorized 

States before the States are authorized 

for the requirements. Thus, EPA will 

implement those requirements and 

prohibitions in Idaho, including issuing 

permits, until the State is granted 

authorization to do so. 

C. What will be the effect if Idaho is 

authorized for these changes? 

If Idaho is authorized for these 

changes, a facility in Idaho subject to 

RCRA will have to comply with the 

authorized State requirements in lieu of 

the corresponding Federal requirements 

in order to comply with RCRA. 

Additionally, such persons will have to 

comply with any applicable Federal 

requirements, such as, for example, 

HSWA regulations issued by EPA for 

which the State has not received 

authorization, and RCRA requirements 

that are not supplanted by authorized 

State-issued requirements. Idaho 

continues to have enforcement 

responsibilities under its State 

hazardous waste management program 

for violations of this program, but EPA 

retains its authority under RCRA 

sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003, 42 

U.S.C. 6927, 6928, 6934 and 6973, and 

any other applicable statutory and 

regulatory provisions, which includes, 

among others, the authority to: 

• Conduct inspections; require 

monitoring, tests, analyses, or reports; 

• Enforce RCRA requirements; 

suspend, terminate, modify or revoke 

permits; and 

• Take enforcement actions regardless 

of whether the State has taken its own 

actions. 

The action to approve these revisions 

will not impose additional requirements 

on the regulated community because the 

regulations for which Idaho will be 

authorized are already effective under 

State law and are not changed by the act 

of authorization. 

D. What happens if EPA receives 

comments on this action? 

If EPA receives comments on this 

action, we will address those comments 

in a later final rule. You may not have 

another opportunity to comment. If you 

want to comment on this authorization, 

you must do so at this time. 

E. What has Idaho previously been 

authorized for? 

Idaho initially received final 

authorization for its hazardous waste 

management program effective April 9, 

1990 (55 FR 11015, March 29, 1990). 

Subsequently, EPA authorized revisions 

to the State’s program effective June 5, 

1992 (57 FR 11580, April 6, 1992), 

August 10, 1992, 1992 (57 FR 24757, 

June 11, 1992), June 11, 1995 (60 FR 

18549, April 12, 1995), January 19, 1999 

(63 FR 56086, October 21, 1998), July 1, 

2002 (67 FR 44069, July 1, 2002), March 

10, 2004 (69 FR 11322, March 10, 2004), 

July 22, 2005 (70 FR 42273, July 22, 

2005), February 26, 2007 (72 FR 8283, 

February 26, 2007), and December 23, 

2008 (73 FR 78647, December 23, 2008). 

F. What changes are we proposing? 

On October 25, 2011, Idaho submitted 

a program revision application 

requesting authorization for all 

delegable Federal hazardous waste 

regulations codified as of July 1, 2010. 

Idaho incorporated the delegable 

Federal regulations by reference in the 

following provisions of the Idaho 

Administrative Procedures Act (IDAPA): 

58.01.05.001 through 58.01.05.010; 

58.01.05.011 with the exception of the 

4th sentence; 58.01.05.012; 

58.01.05.013; 58.01.05.015 through 

58.01.05.018; 58.01.05.356.01; and 

58.01.05.998. This authorization 

revision request includes the following 

Federal rules for which Idaho is being 

authorized for the first time: Exclusion 

of Oil-Bearing Secondary Materials 

Processed in a Gasification System to 

Produce Synthesis Gas (73 FR 57, 

January 2, 2008); NESHAP: Final 

Standards for Hazardous Waste 

Combustors (Phase I Final Replacement 

Standards and Phase II) Amendments 

(73 FR 18970, April 8, 2008); F019 

Exemption for Wastewater Treatment 

Sludges from Auto Manufacturing Zinc 

Phosphating Processes (73 FR 31756, 

June 4, 2008); Revisions to the 

Definition of Solid Waste (73 FR 64668, 

October 30, 2008); Academic 

Laboratories Generator Standards, 

Alternative Standards for Hazardous 

Waste Determination and Accumulation 

(73 FR 72912, December 1, 2008); 

Expansion of RCRA Comparable Fuel 

Exclusion (73 FR 77954, December 19, 

2008); OECD Requirements; Export 

Shipments of Spend Lead-Acid Batteries 

(75 FR 1236, January 8, 2010); 

Hazardous Waste Technical Corrections 

and Clarifications (75 FR 12989, March 

18, 2010); and Withdrawal of the 

Emission Comparable Fuel Exclusion 

(75 FR 33712, June 15, 2010). EPA 

proposes to revise the state’s authorized 

hazardous waste program in its entirety 

through July 1, 2010. Notice and an 

opportunity for the public to comment 

on this proposed authorization revision 

action are being provided at this time. 

G. Where are the revised state rules 

different from the Federal rules? 

Under RCRA 3009, EPA may not 

authorize State rules that are less 

stringent than the Federal program. Any 

State rules that are less stringent do not 

supplant the Federal regulations. State 

rules that are broader in scope than the 

Federal program requirements are not 

authorized. State rules that are 

equivalent to, and State rules that are 

more stringent than, the Federal 

program may be authorized, in which 

case they are enforceable by EPA. This 

section discusses certain rules where 

EPA has made the finding that the State 

program is more stringent and will be 

authorized and discusses certain 

portions of the Federal program that are 

not delegable to the State because of the 

Federal government’s special role in 

foreign policy matters. 

EPA does not authorize States to 

administer Federal import and export 

functions in any section of the RCRA 

hazardous waste regulations. Even 

though States do not receive 

authorization to administer the Federal 

government’s import and export 

functions, found in 40 CFR part 262, 

subparts E, F and H, State programs are 

still required to adopt the Federal 

import and export provisions to 

maintain their equivalency with the 

Federal program. The State amended its 

import and export rules to include the 

Federal rule on Organization for 

Economic Cooperation and 

Development (OECD) Requirements; 

Export Shipments of Spend Lead-Acid 

Batteries (75 FR 1236, January 8, 2010). 

The State’s rule is found at IDAPA 

58.01.05.006. EPA will continue to 

implement those requirements directly 

through the RCRA regulations. 

EPA has found that the State’s 

Emergency Notification Requirements, 

(IDAPA 58.01.05.006.02), are more 

stringent than the Federal program. This 

is because the State’s regulations require 

that the State Communications Center 

be contacted along with the Federal 

Center. EPA has found that the State’s 

statutory requirement requiring 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
12230 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 29, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

hazardous waste generators and 

commercial hazardous waste disposal 

facilities to file annual hazardous waste 

generation reports, Idaho Code Section 

39–4411(4) and 39–4411(5), to be more 

stringent than the Federal program. EPA 

will authorize and enforce these more 

stringent provisions. 

H. Who handles permits after the 

authorization takes effect? 

Idaho will continue to issue permits 

for all the provisions for which it is 

authorized and administer the permits it 

issues. If EPA issued permits prior to 

authorizing Idaho for these revisions, 

these permits would continue in force 

until the effective date of the State’s 

issuance or denial of a State hazardous 

waste permit, at which time EPA would 

modify the existing EPA permit to 

expire at an earlier date, terminate the 

existing EPA permit for cause, or allow 

the existing EPA permit to otherwise 

expire by its terms, except for those 

facilities located in Indian Country. EPA 

will not issue new permits or new 

portions of permits for provisions for 

which Idaho is authorized after the 

effective date of this authorization. EPA 

will continue to implement and issue 

permits for HSWA requirements for 

which Idaho is not yet authorized. 

I. What is codification and is EPA 

codifying Idaho’s hazardous waste 

program as authorized in this proposed 

rule? 

Codification is the process of placing 

the State’s statutes and regulations that 

comprise the State’s authorized 

hazardous waste management program 

into the Code of Federal Regulations 

(CFR). This is done by referencing the 

authorized State rules in 40 CFR part 

272. EPA is reserving the amendment of 

40 CFR part 272, subpart N for this 

authorization of Idaho’s program 

revision until a later date. 

J. How would authorizing Idaho for 

these revisions affect Indian country (18 

U.S.C. 1151) in Idaho? 

Idaho is not authorized to carry out its 

hazardous waste program in Indian 

country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. 

Indian country includes: 

1. All lands within the exterior 

boundaries of Indian reservations 

within or abutting the State of Idaho; 

2. Any land held in trust by the U.S. 

for an Indian tribe; and 

3. Any other land, whether on or off 

an Indian reservation, that qualifies as 

Indian country. 

Therefore, this action has no effect on 

Indian country. EPA will continue to 

implement and administer the RCRA 

program on these lands. 

II. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This proposed rule seeks to revise the 

State of Idaho’s authorized hazardous 

waste program pursuant to section 3006 

of RCRA and imposes no requirements 

other than those currently imposed by 

State law. This proposed rule complies 

with applicable executive orders and 

statutory provisions as follows: 

1. Executive Order 12866 and 13563 

This action will authorize revisions to 

the federally approved hazardous waste 

program in Idaho. This type of action is 

exempt from review under Executive 

Order (EO) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 

4, 1993), and Executive Order 13563 (76 

FR 3821, January 21, 2011). 

2. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This action does not impose an 

information collection burden under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 

Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Burden is 

defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). This 

proposed rule does not establish or 

modify any information or 

recordkeeping requirements for the 

regulated community. 

3. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 

as amended by the Small Business 

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 

(SBREFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., 

generally requires Federal agencies to 

prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis 

of any rule subject to notice and 

comment rulemaking requirements 

under the Administrative Procedure Act 

or any other statute unless the agency 

certifies that the rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

Small entities include small businesses, 

small organizations, and small 

governmental jurisdictions. For 

purposes of assessing the impacts of this 

proposed rule on small entities, small 

entity is defined as: (1) A small 

business, as codified in the Small 

Business Size Regulations at 13 CFR 

part 121; (2) a small governmental 

jurisdiction that is a government of a 

city, county, town, school district or 

special district with a population of less 

than 50,000; and (3) a small 

organization that is any not-for-profit 

enterprise which is independently 

owned and operated and is not 

dominant in its field. EPA has 

determined that this proposed action 

will not have a significant impact on 

small entities because the proposed rule 

will only have the effect of authorizing 

pre-existing requirements under State 

law and imposes no additional 

requirements beyond those imposed by 

State law. After considering the 

economic impacts of this action, I 

certify that this action will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This action contains no Federal 

mandates under the provisions of Title 

II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform 

Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1531– 

1538 for State, local, or tribal 

governments or the private sector. This 

action imposes no new enforceable duty 

on any State, local or tribal governments 

or the private sector. Therefore this 

action is not subject to the requirements 

of sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA. 

This action is also not subject to the 

requirements of section 203 of the 

UMRA because it contains no regulatory 

requirements that might significantly or 

uniquely affect small government 

entities. 

5. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action does not have federalism 

implications. It will not have substantial 

direct effects on the States, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132. This rule 

proposes to authorize pre-existing State 

rules in the CFR. Thus, Executive Order 

13132 does not apply to this action. 

Although section 6 of Executive Order 

13132 does not apply to this action, EPA 

did consult with officials of the State of 

Idaho Department of Environmental 

Quality in developing this action. In the 

spirit of EO 13132 and consistent with 

EPA policy to promote communications 

between EPA and state and local 

governments, EPA specifically solicits 

comment on this proposed action from 

state and local officials. 

6. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This action does not have tribal 

implications, as specified in Executive 

Order 13175, because it proposes to 

authorize pre-existing State rules. Thus, 

EPA has determined that Executive 

Order 13175 does not apply to this rule. 

EPA specifically solicits comment on 

this proposed action from tribal 

officials. 

7. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

and Safety Risks 

EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 

(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as 

applying only to those regulatory 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 29, 2012 / Proposed Rules 12231 

actions that concern health or safety 

risks, such that the analysis required 

under section 5–501 of the EO has the 

potential to influence the regulation. 

This action is not subject to EO 13045 

because it proposes to authorize preexisting State rules. 

8. Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 

2001), because it is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ as defined under 

Executive Order 12866. 

9. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law 

104–113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 

note) directs EPA to use voluntary 

consensus standards in its regulatory 

activities unless to do so would be 

inconsistent with applicable law or 

otherwise impractical. Voluntary 

consensus standards are technical 

standards (e.g., materials specifications, 

test methods, sampling procedures, and 

business practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus bodies. 

The NTTAA directs EPA to provide 

Congress, through the OMB, 

explanations when the Agency decides 

not to use available and applicable 

voluntary consensus standards. This 

proposed action does not involve 

technical standards. Therefore EPA is 

not considering the use of any voluntary 

consensus standards. 

10. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR 

7629, February 16, 1994) establishes 

Federal executive policy on 

environmental justice. Its main 

provision directs Federal agencies, to 

the greatest extent practicable and 

permitted by law, to make 

environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies, and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. 

EPA has determined that this 

proposed action will not have 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects 

on minority or low-income populations 

because it does not affect the level of 

protection provided to human health or 

the environment. This action proposes 

to authorize pre-existing State rules 

which are equivalent to, and no less 

stringent than, existing Federal 

requirements. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Confidential business information, 

Hazardous materials transportation, 

Hazardous waste, Indians—lands, 

Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Authority: This proposed action is issued 

under the authority of sections 2002(a), 3006 

and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, 

as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b). 

Dated: February 13, 2012. 

Dennis J. McLerran, 

Regional Administrator, EPA Region 10. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3916 Filed 2–28–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Motor Carrier Safety 

Administration 

49 CFR Parts 385, 390, and 395 

[Docket No. FMCSA–2010–0167] 

RIN 2126–AB20 

Electronic On-Board Recorders and 

Hours of Service Supporting 

Documents 

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety 

Administration (FMCSA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of public listening 

session. 

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces that it will 

hold a public listening session to solicit 

information, concepts, ideas, and 

comments on Electronic On-Board 

Recorders (EOBRs) and the issue of 

driver harassment. Specifically, the 

Agency wants to know what factors, 

issues, and data it should consider as it 

addresses the distinction between 

productivity and harassment: what will 

prevent harassment from occurring; 

what types of harassment already exist; 

how frequently and to what extent 

harassment happens; and how an 

electronic device such as an EOBR, 

capable of contemporaneous 

transmission of information to a motor 

carrier will guard against (or fail to 

guard against) harassment. This session 

will be held in Louisville, Kentucky 

(KY), and will allow interested persons 

to present comments, views, and 

relevant new research that FMCSA 

should consider in development of the 

final rule. This listening session will be 

recorded and a transcript of the session 

will be placed in the docket for 

FMCSA’s consideration. The listening 

session will also be webcast via the 

Internet. 

DATES: The listening session will be 

held on Friday, March 23, 2012, at the 

Mid-America Trucking Show in 

Louisville, KY. The listening session 

will run from 10 a.m.–12 p.m., with a 

break between 12 p.m. and 2 p.m., and 

continue from 2 p.m.–4 p.m. local time, 

or earlier, if all participants wishing to 

express their views have done so. 

ADDRESSES: The listening session will 

be held at the Kentucky Exposition 

Center (KEC), 937 Phillips Lane, 

Louisville, KY 40209, South Wing, 

Meeting Room C–101. 

Internet Address for Live Webcast. 

FMCSA will post specific information 

on how to participate via the Internet on 

the FMCSA web site at: http:// 

www.fmcsa.dot.gov in advance of the 

listening session. 

You may submit comments bearing 

the Federal Docket Management System 

(FDMS) Docket ID FMCSA–2010–0167 

using any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Docket Management Facility; 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001. 

• Hand Delivery or Courier: West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday, 

except Federal Holidays. 

• Fax: 1–202–493–2251. 

Each submission must include the 

Agency name and the docket number for 

this notice. Note that DOT posts all 

comments received without change to 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information included in a 

comment. Please see the Privacy Act 

heading below. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments, go to www.regulations.gov at 

any time or visit Room W12–140 on the 

ground level of the West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. The on-line Federal document 

management system is available 24 

hours each day, 365 days each year. If 

you want acknowledgment that we 

received your comments, please include 

a self-addressed, stamped envelope or 

postcard or print the acknowledgement 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS