alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.16 MB)

Tags:DFSP San Pedro, Task Force 85, Defense Fuel Support Point

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors and Shareholders
The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.:


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-79583) of Santa Cruz Operations of our reports
dated October 22, 1999 except for note 17 which is as of December 1, 1999 and
October 22, 1999 relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

                                                  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
November 6, 2000





The Board of Directors
The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.:



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-79583) on Form S-8 of The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. of our reports dated
October 22, 1997, relating to the consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows of The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
and subsidiaries for the year ended September 30, 1997, and the related
schedule, which reports appear or are incorporated by reference in the September
30, 1999, annual report on Form 10-K/A of The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.

                                                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


Mountain View, California
November 6, 2000
#### Mark A. HOPKINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee.

No. 85-132.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Sept. 20, 1990.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE ORDER AND WARRANT FOR EXECUTION OF DEATH SENTENCE

This case came on before the court upon the Motion to Vacate Order and Warrant for Execution of Death Sentence, filed herein on August 31,1990, on behalf of the Appellant, Mark A. Hopkinson; the Response to Motion to Vacate Order and Warrant for Execution of Death Sentence, filed herein on September 4, 1990, on behalf of the Appellee, the State of Wyoming; and the arguments of counsel on September 19, 1990, and the court, having examined the *1193file and record of the court; having considered the authorities cited by the parties; and having heard the arguments of counsel, and being fully advised in the premises, finds that the Motion to Vacate Order and Warrant for Execution of Death Sentence should be denied, and it therefore is

ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate Order and Warrant for Execution of Death Sentence, filed herein on behalf of the Appellant, Mark A. Hopkinson, be, and the same hereby is, denied.

CARDINE and MACY, JJ., consistent with their views on the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in *Hopkinson v. State,*No. 90-218, In the Supreme Court, State of Wyoming would stay the execution now ordered for September 25, 1990.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 3- 23 58

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Pau l Bu rch am ; Pa tt y

Bu rch am
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff s - Ap pe ll an ts

v.
W ey erh aeu se r NR Co m

pa ny
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee
Bi tu m in ou s In su ran ce Co m pa ny; Mi ke Alex an de r Log gi ng
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l In te rv en or Pla in ti ff s

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s - Tex ark an a

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Feb ru ary 7, 2 01 4 Fi le d: Marc h 2 5, 2 01 4 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, BYE, an d C OLLOTO N, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Pau l an d Pat ty Bu rch am (th e Bu rch am s) ap pe al th e di s t r i c t c ou rt’s ad ve rs e 1 gr an t of su m

m ary jud gm en t in th ei r di ve rs it y ne gl ig en ce act i on whi ch aro se fro m in juri es Pau l Bu rch am su st ai ne d whi le us in g a ch ai ns aw to rem ov e ti m be r. Upo n de

no vo rev ie w o f th e reco rd an d th e di s tri ct co ur t’s ap pl ic at io n of st at e la w, s ee Day 2 v. Case Cred it Co rp ., 42 7 F.3d 11 48 , 11 52 (8 th Ci r. 20 05 ), we affi rm
. Sp eci fic al ly,

we fin d th at ev en as su m in g th at th e reco rd es ta bl is he d ge nu in e is su es of m at eri al fact

o n w h e t he r W ey erh aeu se r NR Co m pa ny (WN R) un de rto ok to pr ov id e a sa fe wor k

en vi ro nm en t, a jury wou ld be un ab le to co nc lu de th at th ere was ne gl ig en ce on W NR’s pa rt. See Sto lt ze v. Ark

. Vall ey Elec t. Co op
. Co rp ., 12 7 S.W

. 3d 46 6, 46 9- 70 (Ark

. 20 03 ) (o ne ex cep ti on to ge ne ral ru le th at em pl oyer is no t res p o n s i b le fo r in juri es
su st ai ne d by in de pe nd en t co nt ract or ’s em pl oyees is whe n em

pl oyer un de rta ke s to pe rfo rm cert ai n du ti es an d ne gl ig e n t l y fai ls to pe rfo rm th em or pe rfo rm s th em
ne gl ig en tl y ); see al so W ag ne r v. Gen

. Mo to rs Co rp ., 25 8 S.W .3d 74 9, 75 3- 54 (Ark

. 20 07 ) (es se nt ia l el em en ts of ne gl ig en ce cl ai m ); Bes s v. Herri n, 83 1 S.W

. 2d 90 7, 90 8 (Ark

. 19 92 ) (n eg li ge nc e can no t be pr es um ed fro m m ere ha pp en in g of acci de nt ). The jud gm en t o f th e d is tri ct co ur t i s af fir m ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Su sa n O. Hick ey , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn 1 Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s. W e fin d no m eri t to th e Bu rch am s’ co nt en ti on s th at th e di st ric t cou rt di d no t 2
co ns tru e th e reco rd in a li gh t m os t fav or ab le to th em , se e McKe nn ey v. Harri so n, 63 5 F.3 d 35 4, 35 8 (8 th Ci r. 20 11 ), or im pr op erl y mad e cred ib il it y de te rm in at io ns , se e Co ke r v. Ark . Sta te Po li ce, 7 34 F.3d 83 8, 8 43 (8t h C ir. 2 01 3)

. -2

-
Gottsegen Employment Agreement, First Amendment



 Exhibit 10(c) 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), is made and entered into as of the
31st day of March 2010, by and between United Rentals,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Jonathan M. Gottsegen, a resident of the State of New York (“Executive”). 

RECITALS 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive previously entered into that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of February 2, 2009 (the
“Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, on March 11, 2010, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of
Directors determined to increase Executive’s target incentive opportunity under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan from 60% of Base Salary (at the beginning of the applicable performance period) to 80% of Base Salary (at the beginning of
the applicable performance period); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement to reflect
Executive’s increased target incentive opportunity percentage. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
and agreement contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Pursuant to and in accordance with Section 7(l) of the Agreement, the third sentence of Section 3(c) of the Agreement is hereby amended and replaced in full
with the following language: 

 “Executive’s target incentive opportunity under the Annual Incentive
Plan shall be 80% of Base Salary (as at the beginning of the applicable performance period) and Executive’s maximum incentive opportunity shall be 100% of Base Salary (as at the beginning of the applicable performance period).” 

 

	 	2.	Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. 


 

	 	3.	Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 


 

	 	4.	This Amendment may be amended only by a writing which makes express reference to this Amendment as the subject of such amendment and which is signed by Executive and,
on behalf of the Company, by its duly authorized officer. 

  

	 	5.	This Agreement shall be governed by and construed (both as to validity and performance) and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of










	 	
Connecticut applicable to agreements made and to be performed wholly within such jurisdiction, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law or where the parties are located at the time a
dispute arises. 

 [Signature page follows.] 

 

 2 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first
written above. 
  

							
	UNITED RENTALS, INC.	 	 	 	EXECUTIVE
				
	 By:
	 	 /s/ MICHAEL J. KNEELAND
	 		 	 /s/ JONATHAN M. GOTTSEGEN

	 Name:
	 	Michael J. Kneeland	 		 	Jonathan M. Gottsegen
	 Title:
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 		 	

  

 3
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

** **

I, Mark Gatto, certify that:

1.     I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CĪON Investment Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     I am responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

(a)   Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     I have disclosed,based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)   All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2013

 

|   | /s/  Mark Gatto

Mark Gatto  Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President

*(Principal Executive  Officer)* |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | CĪON Investment  Corporation                                                                          |

 

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7144

DANNY HOSKIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HELEN F. FAHEY; DAVID N. HARKER; CAROL ANN

SIEVERS; HERBERT COULTON; MICHAEL M. HAWES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief

District Judge. (CA-04-192)

Submitted: October 7, 2004 Decided: October 15, 2004

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Hoskin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Danny Hoskin appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his

motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Hoskin v. Fahey, No. CA-04-192 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 7,

2004 & entered Apr. 12, 2004; filed June 22, 2004 & entered

June 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
HATTIESBURG-LAUREL 

REGIONAL AIRPORT <PIBJ 

May 7, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

" i ; . I 

Reference; DOT-OST-2008~0209, 2001-10685, 2009-0305, 2000-7856 

Greenville, MS, Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS, Tupelo, MS and Muscle Shoals, AL EAS 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

1 002 Terminal Drive 

Moselle, MS 39459 

Phone (601) 545-3111 

(601) 649-2444 

Fax (601) 545-3155 

That Hattiesburg-Laurel Regional Airport Authority in Moselle, Mississippi wishes to lend its support to 

the proposal of Silver Airways to provide essential air service at Hattiesburg-Laurel (PIB), Mississippi as 

replacement for current Delta Air Lines service. 

Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air 

transportation system is critical to the economic well being ofthe Hattiesburg-Laurel, Mississippi area. 

The Silver Airways proposals offer us a modern 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights to Atlanta, which is 

not only the largest hub airport in the world but also a popular business and leisure travel destination 

from Hattiesburg-Laurel Regional Airport. 

We believe the Silver air service proposals represent the best option for retaining our local air service 

long term and building up traffic so that government subsidies can eventually be reduced or eliminated. 

We urge the Department of Transportation to award Silver Airways the designation to provide _ 

Hattiesburg-Laurel (PI B), Mississippi essential air service. 

Best regards, 

. ~-- ~~e, Executive Director 

Hattiesburg-Laurel Regional Airport Authority
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41486 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SERGIO QUINTERO-GUEVARA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-454-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Sergio QuinteroGuevara raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.51 MB)

Tags:Loglines, November 2018, DLA Logistics Operations

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35352-35353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13962]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending May 25, 
2013

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within

[[Page 35353]]

21 days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2013-0110.
    Date Filed: May 24, 2013.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

PTC COMP Mail Vote 734.
Resolution 024d Currency Names, Codes.
Rounding Units and Acceptability of Currencies.
South Africa Implementation date: 17 June 2013
(Memo PTC COMP 1713).

    Intended effective date: June 10, 2013.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Acting Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2013-13962 Filed 6-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```