alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.42 MB)

Tags:Air Forces Central Command, 455th Expeditionary Logistics Readiness Squadron, U.S. AFCENT, U.S. Air Force, pilot, aircraft, 455th Air Expeditionary Wing, Bagram Airfield, Bagram, team, Air Force, Afghanistan, usaf, airmen, vehicle maintenance, aerial port, vehicles, fuels, fuels, contractors, aircrew, Operation Freedom’s Sentinel, supply, contingency operations, passenger terminal, NATO Resolute Support, transportation management

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 32.1





WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES — OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of HMS Income Fund, Inc. (“the Company”), each hereby certifies that to his or her knowledge, on the date hereof:





(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018 , filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section l3(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:August 14, 2018By:/s/ SHERRI W. SCHUGARTSherri W. SchugartChairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentDate:August 14, 2018By:/s/ RYAN T. SIMSRyan T. SimsChief Financial Officer and Secretary
ex4c.htm


SUBPRIME ADVANTAGE, INC.







TOTAL AUTHORIZED ISSUE


100,000,000 SHARES PAR VALUE $.001 EACH


COMMON STOCK







THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ________________________________________ IS THE OWNER OF _________________________________________________________________________ FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE ABOVE CORPORATION TRANSFERABLE ONLY ON THE BOOKS OF THE CORPORATION BY THE HOLDER HEREOF IN PERSON OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED WITNESS, THE SEAL OF THE CORPORATION AND THE SIGNATURES OF ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS.







DATED












SECRETARY                                                                                     PRESIDENT
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1128

_____________________________

TRENTON PATRICK HOOKS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County.

Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.

June 13, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

KELSEY, WINOKUR, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Trenton Patrick Hooks, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
U.S. Department of Transportation 12/23/15

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption No. 13255

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–3244

Dear Sir or Madam:

Please accept this as formal petition to amend PT Geospatial LLC (hereinafter petitioner or 

operator) section 333 exemption number 13255 to add the following sUAS:

• Swift Radioplanes Lynx M

The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the Swift Radioplanes Lynx M in 

Exemption No. 11432A (Compass Data, Inc.).

All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms set forth in the

previously approved FAA Exemption No. 13255. Since the requested amendment to the 

petitioner’s exemption would not set any precedent or raise any novel issue, and because 

petitioner seeks to begin these operations without delay, PT Geospatial respectfully requests the 

FAA to determine that good cause exists to grant the requested amendment expeditiously by 

summary means.

Thank you for your consideration of this amendment request and please be in contact if you

require any additional information.

.

Sincerely,

Mr. Roy Tomlinson

Owner

PT Geospatial LLC

140 Liner Street

Ruston, LA 71270

trent@ptgeospatial.com
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special                               ( print page 10541)                            Emphasis Panel; Collaborative Research on the Transition from Acute to Chronic Pain.                    

*Date:*                         March 12, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Silver Spring, 8727 Colesville Road, Silver Spring, MD 20910.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Victor Henriquez, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, DEA/SRB/NIDCR, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 668, Bethesda, MD 20892-4878, 301-451-2405,                         *henriquv@nidcr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 14, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-4103 Filed 2-21-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 195 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 195

To authorize testimony and representation In the Matter of the Proposed 
                    Discipline of Laura Block Lower.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2013

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize testimony and representation In the Matter of the Proposed 
                    Discipline of Laura Block Lower.

Whereas, in the Matter of the Proposed Discipline of Laura Block Lower, Case No. 
        2012-SWP-LIC-445, pending before the Montana Board of Social Work 
        Examiners and Professional Counselors, the licensee has requested the 
        deposition of Siobhan Gilmartin, an employee in the state office of 
        Senator Jon Tester;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to 
        any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their official 
        responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Siobhan Gilmartin is authorized to provide testimony 
in the Matter of the Proposed Discipline of Laura Block Lower, except 
concerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Siobhan Gilmartin in connection with the production of testimony 
authorized in section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

TIMOTHY WEINER

,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D 16

- 3414

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O

JESICA M. SOINSKI

,

Appellee.

/

Opinion filed March 17, 2017

Non

- Final Appeal from the Circuit

Court for Hernando County,

Donald E. Scaglione

, Judge.

Timothy Weiner, New Port Richey, pro se

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Toni C. Bernstein,

Senior Assistant Attorney General,

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

ON CONF ESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to The Flor ida Department of Revenue’s Conf ession of Error, we reverse

the Order on Objection to Driver’s License Suspension Report of the Child Support

Hearing Officer

, and remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and EDWARDS

, JJ., concur.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
POWER MANAGEMENT SOL UTIONS LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVIC ES, INC., Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2013

- 1455

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 12

- CV

- 0426, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

POWER MANAGEMENT SOL UTIONS LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

NVIDIA CORPORATION, Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2013

- 1456

______________________Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 12

- CV

- 0427, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

POWER MANAGEMENT SOL UTIONS LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant

- Appellee,

AND

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS IN CORPORATED, Defendant

- Appellee,

AND

MARVELL SEMICONDUCTO R, INC., Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2013

- 1457

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 11

- CV

- 0743, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________

B RYAN G UY H ARRISON , Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. With him on the brief was J EFFREY T HOMAS B RELOSKI

.3

D AVID C. M ARCUS , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for all defendant s-appellees . With him on the brief for defendant

appellee Intel Corporation were M ARK C. F LEMING , L OUIS W. T OMPROS , and K EVIN A. G OLDMAN , of Boston, Mass achus etts; and A RTHUR W. C OVIELLO , of Palo Alto, Califo rnia. O n the brief for defendant -appellee Texas Instruments Incorporated was T HOMAS R. J ACKSON , Jones Day, of Dallas, Texas. Of counsel was D ANIEL T. C ONRAD

. On the brief for defendant

- appellee Marvell Semi conductor, Inc., was M ICHAEL A. M OLANO , Mayer Brown, LLP, of Palo Alto, California

.

A

ARON R. F AHRENKROG , Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, for defendant

appellee Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

M ICHAEL G. R HODES , Cooley LLP, of San Francisco, California, for defendant

- appellee NVIDIA Corporation. With him on the brief were B ENJAMIN G. D AMSTEDT and L AM K. N GUYEN , of Palo Alto, California.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (R ADER , Chief Judge, L OURIE , and M OORE , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 14, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) of United States Oil Fund, LP (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Nicholas D. Gerber, the Chief Executive Officer of United States
Commodity Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Date: November
      9, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Nicholas D. GerberName:
              Nicholas
      D. GerberTitle:
              Chief
      Executive OfficerUnited
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
                General
      Partner of United States Oil Fund, LP
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-2546EA

_____________ Debra Kay Fuller, * * Appellant, *

* v. * * Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing * Appeal from the United States Corporation, Inc.; Oil, Chemical and * District Court for the Eastern Atomic Workers International Union; * District of Arkansas. Bill Venable, as President of AWU and * Individually; Jerry Jones, Individually; * [UNPUBLISHED] Tony Hudson, Individually and as * Supervisor of 3M; Ed Reagan, * Individually and as Supervisor of 3M, * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: December 8, 1997

Filed: December 16, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. DebraKa y Fuller appeals the district court's rulings and judgment that denie d relie f on Fuller's employment-related discrimination claims. Having reviewed th e record and the parties briefs, we conclude that an extensive discussion is not warranted.-2-

We believe the district court's decisions are correct, and we affirm on the basis of the district court's opinion. See8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Fuller's attorney's motion for permission to withdraw as moot. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-10067

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

AVERY LASHAUN BENNETT, also known as Soldier,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-41-4

Before WIENER, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Avery Lashaun Bennett, federal prisoner # 32980-177, proceeding pro se

and in forma pauperis, challenges the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) motion seeking modification of his 2005 sentence of 188 months of

imprisonment for possession with intent to distribute less than 50 grams of

cocaine base and aiding and abetting. 

The decision to reduce a sentence pursuant to § 3582(c)(2) is reviewed for

abuse of discretion. See United States v. Evans, 587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 4, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 12-10067 Document: 00512009349 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/04/2012
No. 12-10067

2009). In determining whether to reduce a sentence, the court first determines

whether a sentence modification is authorized and to what extent. Dillon v.

United States, 130 S. Ct. 2683, 2691 (2010). Next, the court must consider any

applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and determine whether any

reduction is warranted. Id. at 2692. 

The court implicitly determined Bennett was eligible for a reduction, see

United States v. Larry, 632 F.3d 933, 936 (5th Cir. 2011), but concluded that it

was not warranted in the light of the § 3553(a) factors and the circumstances of

his case. Having concluded that Bennett was eligible for a reduction, the court

was under no obligation to reduce his sentence. See United States v. Evans, 587

F.3d 667, 673 (5th Cir. 2009); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, comment. (n.1(B)(i-iii)). The

court properly considered the § 3553(a) factors and Bennett’s post-sentencing

conduct. See Evans, 587 F.3d at 672-73; U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, cmt. n.1 (B)(i)-(iii). 

We see no abuse of discretion in the court’s determination.

In his reply brief, Bennett argues for the first time that there is a disparity

in the way defendants’ motions for reduction of sentences are handled,

specifically referring to two other individuals. This court generally does not

consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief. See United States

v. Rodriguez, 602 F.3d 346, 360 (5th Cir. 2010). In any event, Bennett has not

shown that the two people he cited have similar criminal records, which include

gang membership, or similar post-sentencing conduct involving sexual conduct. 

Thus, he has not shown that any disparity was unwarranted. 

Bennett has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in

denying § 3582(c)(2) relief. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 12-10067 Document: 00512009349 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/04/2012
ex10-22.htm


Exhibit 10.22

 

Director Compensation Summary

 (EFFECTIVE AS OF MAY 22, 2015)

 

     Employee directors receive no additional compensation other than their normal salary for serving on the Board or its committees. The Chairman of the Board receives $130,000 annually. Each non-employee director (other than the Chairman of the Board) receives $55,000 annually. In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives a $30,000 annual retainer. The Chairmen of the Compensation and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees each receive an additional $20,000 annual retainer. Each Audit Committee member (other than the Chairman of the Committee) receives an additional $15,000 annual retainer. Each member of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees (other than the Chairmen of those Committees) receives an additional $10,000 annual retainer. Outside directors (including the Chairman of the Board) also receive an initial grant, upon first election or appointment, and an annual grant of shares of restricted stock equal to $150,000, except the Chairman of the Board who receives an annual grant of shares of restricted stock equal to $170,000, which valuation is based on the price of Newpark stock on the date of the grant (appointment, election or re-election).

 

 

 

(effective as of MARCH 1, 2016)

 

     Reflecting conditions in the oil and gas industry, the annual retainers of each of the Board members has been reduced by 10% effective March 1, 2016. Employee directors receive no additional compensation other than their normal salary for serving on the Board or its committees. The Chairman of the Board receives $117,000 annually. Each non-employee director (other than the Chairman of the Board) receives $49,500 annually. In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives a $27,000 annual retainer. The Chairmen of the Compensation and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees each receive an additional $18,000 annual retainer. Each Audit Committee member (other than the Chairman of the Committee) receives an additional $13,500 annual retainer. Each member of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees (other than the Chairmen of those Committees) receives an additional $9,000 annual retainer. Outside directors (including the Chairman of the Board) also receive an initial grant, upon first election or appointment, and an annual grant of shares of restricted stock equal to $150,000, except the Chairman of the Board who receives an annual grant of shares of restricted stock equal to $170,000, which valuation is based on the price of Newpark stock on the date of the grant (appointment, election or re-election).