alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Garth Likes, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cyplasin Biomedical
      Ltd. for the period ended April 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Cyplasin Biomedical Ltd.                                                                 

|Dated: June 14, 2010 | /s/
      Garth Likes                                          
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | Garth Likes                                                    
|                     | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director                
|                     | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer
|                     | and Principal Accounting Officer)                              
|                     | Cyplasin Biomedical Ltd.                                       



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cyplasin
Biomedical Ltd. and will be retained by Cyplasin Biomedical Ltd. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1172 

CA 14-00175 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF SYNERGY, LLC AND SYNERGY 

BIOGAS, LLC, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SUSAN KIBLER, ASSESSOR, TOWN OF COVINGTON, 

TOWN OF COVINGTON BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 

RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS, 

AND WYOMING CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, ROCHESTER (KARL S. ESSLER OF COUNSEL),

FOR PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS. 

DIMATTEO LAW OFFICE, WARSAW (DAVID M. ROACH OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. 

HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (J. RYAN WHITE OF COUNSEL), FOR

INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.

SUSAN G. ROSENTHAL, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND

MARKETS, ALBANY (JOHN F. RUSNICA OF COUNSEL), FOR COMMISSIONER OF THE

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND MARKETS, AMICUS CURIAE.

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark

H. Dadd, A.J.), entered December 23, 2013. The order denied

petitioners’ motion for leave to reargue and/or renew. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as

it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is

affirmed without costs. 

Same Memorandum as in Matter of Synergy, LLC v Kibler ([appeal

No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Jan. 2, 2015]). 

Entered: January 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTOION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Santa Fe Gold Corporation. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our
knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                                                                             
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
      Report.

|Date: July 2, 2013 | /s/ W. Pierce Carson                                        
|------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                   | W. Pierce Carson                                            
|                   | Chief Executive Officer, President, Director                
|                   | And Chairman of the Board                                   
|                   |                                                             
|                   | /s/ Michael P. Martinez                                     
|                   | Michael P. Martinez                                         
|                   | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
      Officer)

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.46 MB)

Tags:Loglines, DLA Distribution, March 2018, Sig Sauer P320

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 36 Referred in House (RFH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 36

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2014

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY TO AWARD CONGRESSIONAL GOLD 
              MEDAL TO THE NEXT OF KIN OR PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF 
              RAOUL WALLENBERG.

    (a) In General.--The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be 
used on July 9, 2014, for a ceremony to award the Congressional Gold 
Medal to the next of kin or personal representative of Raoul Wallenberg 
in recognition of his achievements and heroic actions during the 
Holocaust.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the ceremony described 
in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance with such 
conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

            Passed the Senate May 22, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
AFS-10-342-E September 24, 2010 Exemption No. 9382B Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-25466

Mr. Robert W. Kneisley

Associate General Counsel

Southwest Airlines Co. 1901 L Street, NW., Suite 640 Washington, DC 20036

Dear Mr. Kneisley:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9382, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated July 23, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Southwest Airlines Company (Southwest) for an extension of Exemption No. 9382, as amended. That exemption from § 121.391(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Southwest to substitute a qualified crewmember for one required flight attendant crewmember during boarding at all stops and to reduce the number of required flight attendants onboard during the deplaning of passengers at all stops, subject to certain

conditions and limitations.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Southwest.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9382, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 9382, as amended, to September 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9382, as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9382.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen Director, Flight Standards Service
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANK VARELA, on behalf of himself and 

all other similarly situated, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

LAMPS PLUS, INC.; LAMPS PLUS 

CENTENNIAL, INC.; LAMPS PLUS 

HOLDINGS, INC.; DOES, 1 through 10, 

inclusive, 

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 16-56085 

D.C. No. 

5:16-cv-00577-DMG-KS 

ORDER*

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Before: FERNANDEZ and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela, No. 

17-988, 2019 WL 1780275 (U.S. Apr. 24, 2019), the memorandum disposition of 

this Court dated August 3, 2017, is VACATED, and judgment is entered 

REVERSING the district court’s judgment. We remand this case to the district 

court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. 

REVERSED and REMANDED.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

FILED

MAY 31 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6124

JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SALLIE C. SMITH; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA;

OCONEE COUNTY,

Respondents - Appellees,

and

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (2:06-3012-HMH-RSC)

Submitted: June 29, 2007 Decided: July 18, 2007

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Julian Edward Rochester seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rochester has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability, deny the motion for leave to appeal in forma

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. The motion to compel the district court to

rule on an application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Erik Levitt, the Chief Executive Officer of Hammer Fiber Optics Holdings Corp., certify, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended January 31, 2020, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

Date: March 23, 2020

 

**Hammer Fiber Optics Holdings Corp.**

 

By: */s/ Erik B. Levitt*

Name: Erik B. Levitt

Title: Chief Executive Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this
Quarterly Report of Mojo Data Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Spiteri, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: September 6, 2018 | By: | /s/ Joseph Spiteri                                
|----------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Joseph Spiteri                                    
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer, Mojo Data Solutions, Inc.

| |  | 
| |  |
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 297 

Congratulating the Minnesota Lynx women’s basketball team on winning 

the 2013 Women’s National Basketball Association Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2013 

Mr. FRANKEN (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Minnesota Lynx women’s basketball team 

on winning the 2013 Women’s National Basketball Association Championship. 

Whereas on October 10, 2013, the Minnesota Lynx won the 

2013 Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA) 

Championship; 

Whereas this is the second WNBA Championship for the 

Minnesota Lynx in 3 years; 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx won every game in the 2013 

WNBA playoffs, beating the Seattle Storm in the Western Conference semifinals, the Phoenix Mercury in the 

Conference finals, and decisively beating the Atlanta 

Dream in the Championship round; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 297 ATS 

Whereas, on average, more than 13,000 fans attended each 

home game during the Championship round at the Target Center in Minneapolis to cheer on the Minnesota 

Lynx; 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx feature 3 gold medal-winning 

Olympians, Maya Moore, Seimone Augustus, and Lindsay 

Whalen, and a highly talented team of professionals, including Rebekkah Brunson, Janel McCarville, and 

Monica Wright; and 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx are one of only four WNBA 

teams to win multiple titles, with both championships 

coming under the coaching guidance of Cheryl Reeve: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the achievements of the players, 

3 coaches, fans, and staff whose hard work and dedi4 cation helped the Minnesota Lynx win the 2013 

5 Women’s National Basketball Association Cham6 pionship; and 

7 (2) recognizes the Twin Cities region and the 

8 State of Minnesota, both of which enthusiastically 

9 support the team and women’s professional basket10 ball. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
### SERVE D JUL Y 19,201 1
u s . DEPARTMEN T O

H TRANSPORTATION ' . ^/^T-'-J^^^PORJA^ ^ OFFIC EO FHEARING S ''.iUr . U ; Ld-.l|(Jl-l b WASHINGTON , D C ;:Ol i JU L n P 2 : 3"

^ I N TH EMATTERO F SKYWES T AIRLINE S FA A DOCKE T NO . |T 0 B EASSIGNED ) (Civi l Penall y Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2011-048 6 NOTIC EO

K ASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heielofor c designate da s Cas e No . 2011NM060010 ) ha s beenassigne d 1 0 Administrativ e La

w Judg e RichardC . Goodwin . All futur e pleading s andother communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do nth e Judge , t.h

e FA A Hearin g Docket , an

dth e othe r

person s o

n th e attache dServic e List .

Attachment

- Servic e Lis tFDM S No . FAA-2011-048 6 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Tod dC . Emerson , Respondent' s Representativ e Directo r - Govermnen i an dLega l Affair s SkyWes l Airline s 44 4 Sout hRive r

Roa d St . George , U T 8479 0 TEL : . 435-634-353 0 FAX : 435-634-350 5 Jeffre y M . Harper , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Northwes t

Mountai n Region , ANM- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S.W . Rcnton , W A 9805 7 TEL : 425-227-216 1 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodw'm , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

Service wa s b y U.S . Mail . To

r service i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier, use th

e rollowin g address : l-'edera

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2WI000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-'IBO .

- 2 -
SERVED JULY 19,2011 

u s . DEPARTMENT OH TRANSPORTATION' . ^/^T-'-J^^^PORJA^^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ''.iUr. U; Ld-.l|(Jl-lb 

WASHINGTON, DC 

;:Oli JUL n P 2: 3"^ 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. |T0 BE ASSIGNED) 

(Civil Penally Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-0486 

NOTICE OK ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heieloforc designated as Case No. 2011NM060010) has been assigned 

10 Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, t.he FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2011-0486 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Representative 

Director - Govermneni and Legal Affairs 

SkyWesl Airlines 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84790 

TEL: . 435-634-3530 

FAX: 435-634-3505 

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Rcnton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodw'm, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. Tor service in person or by expedited courier, use the rollowing address: l-'ederal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-'IBO. 

- 2 -