alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         124,766
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  565,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (91,156)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      47,080,064
<DEPRECIATION>                            (23,938,318)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,162,099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,745,547
<BONDS>                                     50,093,792
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,677,240)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,162,099
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,713,788
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,092,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,371)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,759,271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,021,003)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,021,003)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,021,003)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (22.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (22.83)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES — OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of HMS Income Fund, Inc. (“the Company”), each hereby certifies that to his or her knowledge, on the date hereof:





(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016 , filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section l3(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:May 16, 2016By:/s/ SHERRI W. SCHUGARTSherri W. SchugartChairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentDate:May 16, 2016By:/s/ RYAN T. SIMSRyan T. SimsChief Financial Officer and Secretary
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.47 MB)

Tags:Naval Aviation Enterprise, DLA Aviation, Strategic engagement, Process excellence, Defense Supply Center Richmond, Graybeards, Warfighter First

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Thermadyne Holdings Corporation of our report dated February 7, 1997,
included in the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders of Thermadyne Holdings
Corporation.
 
     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-82674, Form S-8 No. 33-85552, Form S-8 No. 333-04083
and Form S-3 No. 33-77124) pertaining to the 1993 Management Option Plan, the
1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan and
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, and the 10.25% Senior Notes due May 1,
2002 and the 10.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due November 1, 2003,
respectively, of our reports dated February 7, 1997 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Thermadyne Holdings Corporation
incorporated by reference in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996 and the related financial statement schedule included there,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
March 27, 1997
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-51179 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus IRIS DELGADO-CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-01-CR-362-1-FB

-------------------- June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Iris Delgado-Castillo appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. She contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Delgado-Castillo complains that her sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on her prior deportation following an aggravated felony conviction. She argues that the sentencing provision violates the Due ProcessNo. 01-51179 -2- Clause. Alternatively, Delgado-Castillo contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. She argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in her increased sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in her indictment.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Delgado-Castillo acknowledges that her arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). She seeks to preserve her arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
~ ' 

.'/Fxi!S &11~-r fJ? {l.£z~.z-;t/;f-L ;//k-#LS 

• . - · ll/iLSL do_!'_/1--_!£-f11_a/d~o_:_/!.£-/d- 2. ____ -'--

J21Ji g 'fi_:zij.0v/dL£~* .- U*/aA ~ z;_22£L!/~L- ~ eu-::_:_..;---n ~ /. /"} ~L o :1 t-t_ . .--n .. · - .. 6 - - - - .u_____ ~<..V---. H-{L __ 1_oc..2 __ c:.:;;_~,--'I£ .v.LS'LL;_t!,_L: _'(}I/,£'L_ aL 

_____ J}-;t.~rU( . -% firL.&fL~~P-

~- - ~·~------~----

Z£~~¢ SrLV-~ ~----,---------------

~{;/Q//1/L{; _ 2)~Sai~ .t;-;::t L/Y __ ¢fi1___(}_E;_fj /IL -~_Lf:j_~~-;r-~---------

. ~£Sbd~U~--------. --~-----

~------~-~~---------~­

o·r.rfflA!rJ!s ~//Lz:e>tu<u~U wf.z--r-e~ ~//SA Lff-· i)A!QLCf~LL. ~/]£_ (J_L cfdr::ZZ · (b//,.ec._ .. _-__ 

• . ~~fS_~ ~ 7JA«,U ;z:·L£r;_:/EL4_-z:Q£_r-&!_a_~_r5~--_ 

;u_7f/L$aV6S'¥K2/~,f'~-4~~£L£P~f¥£L~o~ _ _ /}~daL/).d;z;__£kS~~;y_(/£L~&_LY¢L~&:z-2Zz~~£~ 

#L'&L~~LLiiL~W~ oJ€- ~AW'M:J14r"~/ &Ls.voth'Z=_ 

c:-r-· /4~~ I! /. - // /1 Z -P ~· C3 -/ 3 ,;: \ -. L '27'_/,--- -r~r/id-r - _;Lo___7Z& _ ~k.L__. /-L:_(;.L ___ U£~L7_w_ L~-~-- -:,9'.C:--L..C:..DL7-~-

_fo_:J)£_ Q~tfL!I~j/N'& 2Jat'LZJR'/t~ ;f~--~9U'L'2-~ 

_S_;~;;uf_ -~- &//~ ~/~.LLa/dL/Lt:_ ~ · • 

--~-~-~-------~------~---- /I)_J.d._4I12If; ~ ;z;j~t-L22eL.-d. /.tUQ.~ ~ __ ,iS· _·- , 

. 4~L:2odfL_Uif!!Leop-Li2 /AL--~ Pf%& 1J..c/~~ 

a£ l!tfiJjl;.o,L;?;kdl!~- h~Ls_lfh'£J~-.e/:dLd;a._s4~krf0 1 

_l;fd_ JfL_jti.t!f7iJDl~ ¥/£:P_/;fLt1~-c-~_-c;~&.tjEZL 

• {'a,IL~,-"L'df:?~'Ji!.>U -. _ _ · _ , _ _ , _ _ I 

-~£L~Lc2,1__~P~8fi$Lsrr-:zz__;jl:S_fl-,#JL7!/£S-c--#22. _ ~ ·. f ' ./ .! ./' .- .: .'' 

-------~-------' - :1.- ,.:;· 
-------------~·---~-----~--------~~-· 
.• . 

. e ~lf)_lic:; &-~d2?,e.&&::_)tfaL~ lifrz'eL .. r /L~, · .-&::_ezz a.¥--_3_(:)_~-. ;z-~_· ·'u:xj'-'s . t!op.,c_Q_:;Jl-~l/ltl/fl21J'L-~. ,/' '' - ' J .... - '4 ~ 

• • • •." r ~ ' ; ' 1 ' r 

---- --~-3---------------------1 


--t-'
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7618

WILLIAM R. STRONG, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID ROBINSON, Warden, Nottoway Correctional

Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge.

(CA-99-1394-AM)

Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 17, 2000

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William R. Strong, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

October 29, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on November 2, 1999. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the

date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

William R. Strong, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Strong v. Robinson, No. CA-99-

1394-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 2, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 9969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3922]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-73,074]


Johnson Controls D/B/A Hoover Universal, Inc. Including On-Site 
Leased Workers from Kelly Services Sycamore, Illinois; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on June 1, 2010, applicable to workers of Johnson Controls, including 
on-site leased workers from Kelly Services, Sycamore, Illinois. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2010 (75 FR 
34177).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produce 
seating for automobiles.
    The company reports that in the state of Illinois, Johnson Controls 
and Hoover Universal, Inc. are one and the same companies. Some workers 
separated from employment at the subject firm had their wages reported 
under a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account under the name 
Hoover Universal, Inc.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected as a secondary 
component supplier of automotive seating for an active TAA certified 
firm.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-73,074 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ''All workers of Johnston Controls, d/b/a Hoover Universal, 
Inc., including on-site leased workers from Kelly services, 
Sycamore, Illinois, who became totally or partially separated from 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after December 9, 2008, through June 1, 2012, and all workers in the 
group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on 
the date of certification through two years from the date of 
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.''


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of February 2012.
 Michael W. Jaffe.
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-3922 Filed 2-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          49,328
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,423
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,952
<PP&E>                                          82,213
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,365
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,005
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         40
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,688)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,944
<SALES>                                        583,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               583,068
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  534,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,809
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (44,740)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,549
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    70,549
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.97


</TABLE>
Order entered January 12, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01454-CV

No. 05-16-01455-CV

IN RE SENRICK WILKERSON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-01183-J and F10-01184-J

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s December 13, 2016 

petition for writ of mandamus.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### The State, ex rel. Relyea, Appellant, *v.*Schoonmaker, City Mgr., at al., Appellees.

(No. 30723

Decided December 11, 1946.)

*216
      *Mr. Charles J. McLaughlin*and *Mr. Steven L. Markowski,*for appellant.

*Mr. W. G. Christensen,*director of law, and *Mr. Jas. Slater Gibson,*for appellees.

By the Court.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of *Miner*v. *Witt, City Clerk,*82 Ohio St., 237, 92 N. E., 21, and *State, ex rel. Maysville Bridge Co.,*v. *Quinlan, Judge,*124 Ohio St., 658, 181 N. E., 880.

*Judgment affirmed. ■*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Bell, Williams, Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Notices 9899 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–BB69 

New England Fishery Management 

Council; Notice of Intent To Prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS); 

Northeast Multispecies Fishery; Notice 

of Public Scoping Meetings; 

Correction 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; correction. 

SUMMARY: This action makes a 

correction to a notice published on 

December 21, 2011. The notice 

referenced a control date of March 7, 

2011; however the correct date is April 

7, 2011. This notice inserts the correct 

April 7, 2011, control date, as intended. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Travis Ford, Fishery Management 

Specialist, 978–281–9233. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS 

published a Notice of Intent (NOI) to 

prepare an Environmental Impact 

Statement and announced public 

scoping meetings for the New England 

Fishery Management Council’s 

(Council) Amendment 18 to the 

Northeast Multispecies Fishery 

Management Plan (Amendment 18) on 

December 21, 2011 (76 FR 79153). The 

subject document contained an error 

that needs to be corrected. 

In the background information for the 

December 21, 2011 notice there is a 

reference to a March 7, 2011 control 

date for the NE multispecies fishery. 

Because the date reflects the wrong 

month, therefore, NMFS, through this 

notice, corrects the control date to April 

7, 2011. Other published materials 

referencing the control date reflect the 

correct date of April 7, 2011. 

Correction 

The NOI published on December 21, 

2011, in FR Doc. 2011–32694, on page 

79154, in column 2, in the first full 

paragraph, line 2, correct the month 

‘‘March’’ to read as ‘‘April.’’ 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. 

Dated: February 14, 2012. 

Carrie Selberg, 

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable 

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3846 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 11–54] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation 

Agency, Department of Defense. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated July 21, 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 11–54 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: February 14, 2012. 

Aaron Siegel, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
In The · Matter Of: 

### SERVED: March 13, 2017
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC 

## DEPARTMENT OF 

## T

RAt SPORT 

## I ION 

# zn

# n

**R** 

### '

# s P t2: 

## tt3 

## DOCKET OPERATlO S
Docket No. FAA-2015-1321 Fisher Scientific Company, LLC ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2011S0700457 Respondent


### DISMISSAL ORDER On March 2, 2017, the Complainant filed a Withdrawal ofComplaint. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge at any time before or during a hearing. Upon such withdrawal, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the case with prejudice. 

### THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that these proceedings are dismissed with prejudice.

DOUGLAS M. RAWALD Administrative Law Judge Attachment: Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Jerry W. Cox, Respondent's Counsel Counsel for Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

and Fisher Scientific Co., LLC 2050 Jamieson Ave., Suite 1212 Alexandria, VA 22314 TEL: 703-757-5866 ONE COPY

Email: jcox@potomacstrategyassociates.com Ryan Landers, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Enforcement Division, Southern Team Federal Aviation Administration 1701 Columbia Ave. College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5206 FAX: 404-305-5223 The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2015-1321 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.