alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED: October 2, 2018 AMENDED: November 27, 2018 ∗ PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 1173 (L) (LRH

- 2015

- 5 9 2

- GBR)

SIERRA CLUB; WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION; INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION; APPALACHIAN VOICES; CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK Petitioners

v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Army; TODD T. SEMONITE, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; PHILIP M. SECRIST, in his official capacity as District Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District; MICHAEL E. HATTEN, in his official capacity as Chief, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District Respondents MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
Intervenor

∗ The United States Army Corps of Engineers File Number is changed from LRH

2015

- 582

- GBR to LRH

- 2015

- 592

- GBR.2 O R D E R

PER CURIAM: Petitioners ask this Court to set aside Respondent U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (the “Corps”) December 22, 2017, verification and July 3, 2018, reinstated verification that construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline (the “Pipeline”) can proceed under the terms and conditions of Clean Water Act Nationwide Permit 12 (“NWP 12”), rather than an individual permit. Among other arguments, Petitioners assert that, in issuing its verification, the Corps improperly imposed one condition

— requiring use of a “dry cut” method fo r constructing four river crossings

— “in lieu of” a special condition imposed by the State of West Virginia, J.A. 232

— that “[i]ndividual stream crossings must be completed in a continuous, progressive manner within 72 hours , ” J.A. 43

— as part of its certifi cation of NWP 12. Construction of each of the four river crossings using the “dry cut” method is expected to take four

- to

- six weeks to complete. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 717r(d)(1), we conclude, for reasons to be more fully explaine d in a forthcoming opinion, that the Corps lacked authority to substitute the “dry cut” requirement “in lieu of” West Virginia’s 72

- hour temporal
restriction . Accordingly, we VACATE , in its entirety, the Corps’ verification of the Pipeline’s compliance wi th NWP 12

. See 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) ; 33 C.F.R. § 330.6(d) (explaining that if any part of a project requires an individual permit, then “the NWP does not apply and all portions of the project must be evaluated as part of the individual permit3 process . ”). We reserve judgment on the parties’ remaining arguments until our forthcoming opinion



### .

FOR THE COURT /s/ Patricia S. Connor Cl erk
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

NOV 0 6 2015 

Steven Cohen 

President, Drone User Group Network 

11 Lenox Ave 

Ridgewood, NJ 07450 

Dear Mr. Cohen, 

This is in response to your November 2, 2015 comment requesting an extension of the 

comment period for the Federal Register Notice entitled "Clarification of Applicability of 

Aircraft Registration Requirements for Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Request for 

Information Regarding Electronic Registration" (Docket F AA-20 15-4378-0022). In your 

comment, you requested an extension to the comment period for this Notice. 

The Notice comment period closes November 6, 2015. The FAA believes that it is important 

to move quickly to address the registration of small unmanned aircraft systems. Therefore, 

the FAA does not believe it is necessary to extend the comment period per your request, and 

your request for an extension of the comment period is denied. However, as stated in 14 

Code ofFederal Regulations§ 11.45, we will consider comments filed late if it is possible to 

do so without incurring expense or delay. 

We have placed this response in the rulemaking docket. 

Sincerely, 

Director, Office of Rulemaking
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FreeFlow, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), S Douglas Henderson,
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-OxLey Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: March 15, 2013                    By: /s/ S. Douglas Henderson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            S. Douglas Henderson
                                            Chief Executive Officer

     This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 23, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51002 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GUSTAVO BELTRAN-DEL MORO, also known as Rigoberto Del Moro, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-02-CR-896-ALL-PRM

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gustavo Beltran-Del Moro appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the district court erred in determining that his prior state felony conviction for possession of cocaine was a “drug trafficking” crime and thus an “aggravated felony” whichNo. 02-51002 -2- warranted an eight-level increase in his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C)(2001). Beltran-Del Moro’s argument is foreclosed by United States v. Caicedo-Cuero , 312 F.3d 697, 706-11 (5th Cir. 2002), petition for cert. filed , (U.S. March 19, 2003)(No. 02-9747), which held that simple possession of a controlled substance is a drug trafficking crime for purposes of the aggravated felony enhancement in U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C)(2001). Because BeltranDel Moro’s argument is foreclosed, the Government has moved for a summary affirmance. It asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
MOTION GRANTED; AFFIRMED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.84 MB)

Tags:Air Forces Central Command, 455th Expeditionary Logistics Readiness Squadron, U.S. AFCENT, U.S. Air Force, pilot, aircraft, 455th Air Expeditionary Wing, Bagram Airfield, Bagram, team, Air Force, Afghanistan, usaf, airmen, vehicle maintenance, aerial port, vehicles, fuels, fuels, contractors, aircrew, Operation Freedom’s Sentinel, supply, contingency operations, passenger terminal, NATO Resolute Support, transportation management

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 37 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2014 

Referred to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the United States 

Capitol in commemoration of the Shimon Peres Congressional Gold Medal ceremony. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE UNITED STATES 

4 CAPITOL IN COMMEMORATION OF THE 

5 SHIMON PERES CONGRESSIONAL GOLD 

6 MEDAL CEREMONY. 

7 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The rotunda of the United 

8 States Capitol is authorized to be used on June 26, 2014, 

9 for the commemoration of the award of the Congressional 

10 Gold Medal to Shimon Peres. 

11 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

12 conduct of the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SCON 37 RFH 

1 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may 

2 be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the Senate June 11, 2014. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



CERTIFICATION  CFO
    
    Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Robert C. Farenhem

Vice President and Secretary(principal financial and accounting officer)February 27,
2007
 19
**B G**  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 02 55 STATE OF MONTANA,

P la intiff and Appellee , v. CARL SANGREY ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including November 20 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court October 11 2022

10/11/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0255
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.14 MB)

Tags:National Image award, Hispanic Heritage , DLA Troop Support, diversity

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Order entered October 24, 2017 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01047-CV 

EDDY'S MOTORS, LLC, Appellant 

V. 

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC. D/B/A CHRYSLER CAPITAL, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-14698 

ORDER 

By letter dated October 3, 2017, court reporter Thu Bui informed the Court appellant has 

failed to pay the reporter’s fee. That same day, we directed appellant to file, within ten days, 

written verification it had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee. We cautioned appellant that 

failure to comply could result in the appeal being submitted without the reporter’s record. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). To date, however, appellant has not complied. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See id. As the clerk’s record has 

been filed, we ORDER appellant to file its brief no later than November 27, 2017. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

 JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

  

I, Erik Levitt, the Chief Executive Officer of Hammer Fiber Optics Holdings Corp., certify, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended October 31, 2020, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

  

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

  

Date: December 15, 2020

  

**Hammer Fiber Optics Holdings Corp.**

  

By: */s/ Erik B. Levitt*

Name: Erik B. Levitt

Title: Chief Executive Officer

  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
14erR Part 39

14910-I3-Pj

[)EPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal .-\\'iation Administration

lo3~

{Docket No. FAA-IOl 0-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-150-AOj

RlN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Services B.Y. Model F.28 Mark 0070 and UJ00

Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMAR Y: We propose to adopt a new ain.\'orthincss directive (AD) for the produc

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandalOlY continuing mrwonhincss

infonnation (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation prOduce The MeAl describes the unsa~

condition as:

During a llonna1 walkaround check on a f:28 Mark 0100 aeroplane, n large

crack was discovered in the lower p0l1ion of tile right (RR) l\1LG [main

landing gear] piston. The affected MLG unit had accumulated 7909 night

cycles (FC) at the time of detectioo ..• ~ .••

This condition, if not detttted and corrected, could lead to MLG failure,

possibly resulting in loss of comrol orlhe aeroplane during the landing

roll-ouL

The proposed AD would reqUITe actions that arc intended to address the unsafe condni n

fnvJ

described in the MeAl.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45

DAYS AFTER DATE OF PtJBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

FAA Form 1350-14.1 (6·89) OFFICIAL FILE COPY
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameri Metro, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Date: March 23, 2015  By:/s/ Debra MathiasDebra MathiasChief Executive Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 29, 2020

NO. 03

- 18

- 00307

- CV

Robert Anding and Roberta Anding, Appellant s

v.

City of Austin, Texas; and Ferdinand D. Clervi, Austin Municipal Court Judge, Appellee s

APPEAL F ROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the jud gment signed by the tr i a l court on April 30, 2018 . Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that the district court did not err

in denying the Andings ’ motion for summa ry judgment and in gra n t ing the City ’ s motion for

summary judgment. Acco rding ly , we affirm the distric t court ’ s summary judg ment in favor of

the City

. T he C ourt also holds that the district court did err in sust aining Clervi ’ s pl ea to the

jurisdiction. The Court there for e re ve rse s the district court ’ s order sustaining the pl ea and

remand s the Anding s ’ mandamus claim again st Clervi to the district co urt for further

proceedings.

Each party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court

be low.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50876 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
WILLIAM HARRIS JONES , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:14

- CR

- 90

- 1

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * William Harris Jones, federal prisoner # 28772

- 298, who was convicted of attempted coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in sexual activity, moves for leave to proceed in fo rma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. H e see ks to appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion “to reverse ‘void’ federal judgment to correct a ‘manifest injustice,’” which the district court construed

as a petition for a writ of coram nobis

.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 30, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50876 Document: 00513854156 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/30/2017No. 16

- 50876

2 Jones remains in custody . Accordingly , the district court correctly determined that t he writ of coram nobis is not available to him. See United States v. Hatten , 167 F.3d 884, 887 n.6 (5th Cir. 1999). Because the appeal lacks arguable merit and is therefore frivolous,
Jones ’s motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and h is appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Case: 16-50876 Document: 00513854156 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/30/2017
##### 



CERTIFICATION  CEO
    
    Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Richard C. RochonChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)
August 18, 2006