alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2120/2005

of 22 December 2005         

amending Regulation (EC) No 638/2003 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 2286/2002 and Council Decision 2001/822/EC as regards the arrangements applicable to imports of rice originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP States) and the overseas countries and territories (OCT)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1), and in particular Article 13(1) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2286/2002 of 10 December 2002 on the arrangements applicable to agricultural products and goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP States) (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2001/822/EC of 27 November 2001 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Community (Overseas Association Decision) (3), and in particular the seventh subparagraph of Article 6(5) of Annex III thereto,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 638/2003 is hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 December 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96.

(2)OJ L 348, 21.12.2002, p. 5.

(3)OJ L 314, 30.11.2001, p. 1.

(4)OJ L 93, 10.4.2003, p. 3. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1950/2005 (OJ L 312, 29.11.2005, p. 18).

----
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Moosewood Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President, Director,
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: August 19, 2011
**Exhibit 32**

 

Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549

 

RE:         Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Coast Oil Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|   | /s/   Michael J. Ulrich                            |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael   J. Ulrich                                |
|   | Vice   President                                   |
|   | The   Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., |
|   | as   Trustee of Pacific Coast Oil Trust            |

November 7, 2013

 

1

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.23 MB)

Tags:Employee of the Quarter, EOQ

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32

Via EDGAR

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Whiting USA Trust II (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

|  | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--|-----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|  | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. |
|--|-----|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

|   |   |                                                                                     |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Whiting USA Trust II                                                      |
|   |   |                                                                                     |
|   | By:    | The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., |
|   |   | as Trustee                                                                          |
|   |   |                                                                                     |
|   | By:    | /s/ Mike Ulrich                                                                     |
|   |   | Mike Ulrich                                                                              |
|   |   | Vice President                                                                      |
|   |   |                                                                                     |

Date: November 8, 2019
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6561

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALBERT SHAW NELSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CR-95-333)

Submitted: October 31, 2000 Decided: November 16, 2000

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Shaw Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Albert Shaw Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Nelson, No. CR-95-333 (D.S.C.

Mar. 31, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.42 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 31.5





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TORULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Henry Ji, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 28, 2017 | By: | /s/ Henry Ji                         
|-------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------
|                     |     | Henry Ji                             
|                     |     | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |     | (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dino Energy Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending April 30, 2014, I, Vanleo Y.W. Fung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending April 30, 2014, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending April 30, 2014, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  June 19, 2014

Dino Energy Corporation



By: /s/ Vanleo Y.W. Fung



Vanleo Y.W. Fung
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

             CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Form 10-K fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant at the dates and for the periods indicated. No purchaser or seller of
securities shall be entitled to rely on the foregoing statement for any purpose,
and the undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing
statement except as required by law.

                                                FIRST FEDERAL CAPITAL CORP

/s/ Jack C. Rusch                                        February 24, 2004
Jack C. Rusch
President and Chief Executive Officer
(duly authorized officer)

                                       78
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of Reporting Requirements Submitted for OMB Review.

# SUMMARY:

                        Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         notifying the public that the agency has made such a submission.                    

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before March 16, 2012. If you intend to comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline.

*Copies:*                         Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the Agency Clearance Officer.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        Address all comments concerning this notice to:                         *Agency Clearance Officer,*                         Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and                         *OMB Reviewer,*                         Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance Officer, (202) 205-7044.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Title:*                     “Intellectual Property and Women Entrepreneurs.”                

*Frequency:*                     On Occasion.                

*SBA Form Number:*                     N/A.                

*Description of Respondents:*                     Women Entrepreneurs.                

*Responses:*                     60.                

*Annual Burden:*                     100.                

Jacqueline White,

Chief, Administrative Information Branch.

[FR Doc. 2012-3539 Filed 2-14-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Opinion issued September 14, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-21-00336-CR

———————————

IN RE JOHN ANTHONY BUCHANAN, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, John Anthony Buchanan, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has 

filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking an order to compel the trial court to 

vacate a previous order appointing counsel, perform a proper indigency

determination, and reinstate former counsel.1 

We deny the mandamus petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. John Anthony Buchanan, cause 

number 1618854, pending in the 179th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the 

Honorable Ana Martinez presiding. 
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Countiss.

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6338

TIMOTHY D. HILLIARD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JACK LEE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-98-1671-AM)

Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy D. Hilliard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is stamped “filed” on

January 27, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on February 3, 1999. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the

date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy D. Hilliard seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hilliard’s motion to change the name of Respondent,

a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Hilliard v. Lee, No. CA-98-1671-

AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order filed October 26, 2018

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00839-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.Z.A-S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-00529J

____________

NO. 14-18-00840-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.A.A.-S-T. AKA Z.T, A CHILD

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-04990J

ORDER
2

These are accelerated appeals from judgments in parental termination appeals.

Appellant’s brief in each appeal was due October 25, 2018. No brief has been filed. 

Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be 

brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. 

See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (effective May 1, 2012). This accelerated schedule 

requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines. 

Therefore, we order appellant’s appointed counsel, William Thursland, to 

file appellant’s brief no later than November 6, 2018. If the brief is not filed by that 

date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt 

of court. In addition, the court may require appointment of new counsel due to the 

failure to timely file appellant’s brief.

PER CURIAM