alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2006 (the "Report"), I, J.
Richard Iler, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ J. Richard Iler
------------------------------
J. Richard Iler
Principal Financial Officer
March 31, 2006


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals 

For the Seventh Circuit 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Submitted April 20, 2021*

Decided April 21, 2021 

Before 

MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Circuit Judge 

MICHAEL Y. SCUDDER, Circuit Judge 

THOMAS L. KIRSCH II, Circuit Judge

No. 20-3519 

DEBORAH B. BURNS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

 

Appeal from the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. 

No. 20-C-1689 

Lynn Adelman, 

Judge. 

O R D E R 

This appeal is successive and frivolous. In a 2018 action, Deborah Burns sued the 

United States, among others, asserting claims arising out of her federal drug 

prosecution and conviction in 1990. The district court dismissed Burns’s complaint at 

screening. See 18 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We affirmed, concluding that the defendants were 

*

 Under Operating Procedure 6(b), this successive appeal is submitted to the two 

remaining members of the original panel and a third judge assigned at random. The 

defendant was not served with process and is not participating in this appeal. We have 

agreed to decide the case without oral argument because the brief and record 

adequately present the facts and legal arguments, and oral argument would not 

significantly aid the court. FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C). 

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION 

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 
No. 20-3519 Page 2 

either immune or the claims against them were time-barred. Burns v. United States, 

762 F. App’x 338 (7th Cir. 2019). Undeterred, Burns has sued again, still alleging that the 

United States violated her civil rights by falsely charging her for the 1990 drug crime; 

she also accuses the government of “creat[ing] false cases to force enslavement.” After 

granting Burns leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the district court screened and 

dismissed her complaint, explaining that her prior litigation barred the suit and, 

regardless, sovereign immunity protected the United States. 

On appeal, Burns reasserts that the government wrongfully prosecuted her and 

targeted her as a minority in order to enslave her. She raised, or could have raised, these 

contentions in her 2018 lawsuit, because in that action she sued the United States and 

challenged the legality of its prosecution and conviction of her in 1990. Therefore, claim 

preclusion is an insuperable bar to her present action. See Adams v. City of Indianapolis, 

742 F.3d 720, 736 (7th Cir. 2014). Even if her claims were not barred, her complaint 

would still fail for other reasons. Among them: Burns named only one defendant—the 

United States. As we explained in her prior appeal, it is protected by sovereign 

immunity. Burns, 762 F. App’x at 339 (citing Lane v. Pena, 518 U.S. 187, 192 (1996)). 

We have considered Burns’s remaining arguments, and none has merit. We also 

warn Burns that if she persists in further frivolous litigation, we may sanction her with 

fines, the nonpayment of which could lead to a filing bar under Support Systems 

International, Inc. v. Mack, 45 F.3d 185, 186 (7th Cir. 1995). 

AFFIRMED
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-11-0528 SAT Date: 8/2/2011 Print Date: 5/1/2013

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3 Health: PMN substance ; Eco: chronic concerns only for the intact materi 2 3 Health: Incomplete incineration product ; Eco: concern for toxicity of inc o incineration produts to terrestrial organisms
Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 31 2

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ;

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: N oi Commen t Keywords : Keywords: IRR-E,S,L GI SENS UNCERT DEVEL AQUATOX-C

LIVER BLOODMALE REPRO

IMMUNO ONCO
AQUATOX-C Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-11-0528 FATE: log Kow = 7.38 (E)
VP = 5.7E-2 torr at 25 C (E) BP = 236 C (E) H = 9.74E+0 (E) log Koc = 6.76 (E) log Fish BCF = 3.94 (E) log Fish BAF = 5.87 (E) POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption and stripping Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate Volatilization half-life from a standard river = 2 hrs Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 9 da Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 2.0 hr via OH radical PBT Potential: P3B3 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = moderate

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes, based on physical/chemical p roperties. The thiol constituent of the PMN can form in the body. There is concern for irritation to the eye, skin, and lung, and for disturbances to the GI tract if ingested, based on information in the PMN MSDS. There also is concern for sensitization, and uncertain concern for developmental toxicity, based on

. For the potential degradation product, based on test data for the analog concerns are liver toxicity, blood toxicity, and male reproductive toxicity [rat 28-day oral N OAEL = 50 mg/kg, LOAEL = 150 mg/kg with liver toxicity; rat 90-day oral LOAEL = 10 mg/kg based on decreased body weight in males at all doses and liver toxicity and anemia at 200 mg/kg; there were toxic effects on the testes in 2 males in the 90-day oral study that were judged by the reviewer to be indicative of the potential for male reproductive toxicity. There is also concern for immunosuppression and oncogenicity based on data forEcotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value 0.001 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.001
algal

_ chronic value 0.016 or *
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for thiols; SAR chemical class = thiol- MW 468; log Kow = 7.38 (EPI), 6.71 (ACD); p H7; 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; high concern for the degradation product
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1

SARs thiols SAR Class thiol new chemicals category: thiols Ecotox Category
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 11 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 11

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Friday, March 
22, 2013 through Tuesday, March 26, 2013, on a motion offered pursuant 
to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, 
it stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on Monday, April 8, 
2013, or such other time on that day as may be specified by its 
Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or 
until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House 
adjourns on Monday, March 25, 2013, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 9, 2013, or until the 
time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, or their respective designees, acting jointly after consultation 
with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority Leader of the 
House, shall notify the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, 
to reassemble at such place and time as they may designate if, in their 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the Senate March 23 (legislative day, March 22), 
      2013.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 11

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an 
              adjournment of the House of Representatives.
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.81 MB)

Tags:pacer, DLA, DLA troop support

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00135-CV

CENTRAL STATES WATER RESOURCES,

INC., Appellant

V.

TERRA SOUTHWEST, INC., Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 431st District 

Court

of Denton County (21-10909-431)

August 11, 2022

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 472/2006

of 22 March 2006         

derogating for 2006 from Regulation (EC) No 1518/2003 regarding the date of issue of export licences in the pigmeat sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in pigmeat (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Notwithstanding Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1518/2003, licences shall be delivered for 2006 on the dates set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

This derogation shall apply provided that none of the special measures referred to in Article 3(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1518/2003 have been taken before the dates of issue in question.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 March 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2)OJ L 217, 29.8.2003, p. 35. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1361/2004 (OJ L 253, 29.7.2004, p. 9).

----

ANNEX

----
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the quarterly report of First Independence Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q /A Amendment No. 1 for the period ended November 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Bruno Pasquali, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  March 6, 2013/s/ Nigel G. LindsayNigel G. Lindsay , PresidentPrincipal Executive Officer,Principal Financial and Accounting Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ex10_47.htm








Exhibit 10.47







RENEWAL AND EXTENSION AGREEMENT







This Renewal and Extension Agreement is entered into effective as of April 7, 2010 between Best Energy Services, Inc. (“Company”) and James Byrd, Jr. (“Byrd”)







1.           Byrd is the current Vice Chairman of Best, serving under an original agreement dated June 16, 2008, as amended (the “Agreement”).







2.           The parties hereby renew and extend the Agreement under the terms hereof.







3.           Byrd shall continue to act as Vice Chairman of Best, for an additional period of 12 months, up through and including March 31, 2011.







4.           Byrd shall continue to provide ongoing assistance and consulting to the CEO and management of Best as provided under the Agreement. For his services, Byrd shall be paid cash compensation of $4,000 per month, payable on the 15th of each month. This payment shall be in addition to any other remuneration that Byrd is entitled to receive, or is awarded as a member of the Board of the Company.







4.           The parties acknowledge that Byrd has been serving in this capacity since June 2009 without any cash or other remuneration, and that the sum of $48,000 is owed Byrd for those services ($8,000 per month for July, August and September 2009 and $4,000 per month for October 2009 through March 2010). In lieu of cash compensation for said past monies owed, the Company agrees to issue, and Byrd agrees to accept 240,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company, which shall be issued forthwith, to Byrd & Company, LLC.







5.           Except as specifically amended hereby, all other terms and conditions of the original Agreement shall be incorporated by reference under the terms of this renewal.







Best Energy Services, Inc.








	
By:

	
/s/ Mark Harrington

	  	
/s/ James Byrd, Jr.


	
Mark Harrington, Chairman and CEO

	  	
James Byrd, Jr.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: CIVIL BEAT LAW CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST, INC.,

______________________________

CIVIL BEAT LAW CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST, INC.,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII,

Respondent. No. 23

- 70023

MEMORANDUM *

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Argued and Submitted February 15, 2024

Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: PAEZ, M. SMITH, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest, Inc. (Civil Beat) petitions the

court for a writ of mandamus . Civil Beat request s that the court invalidate portions

of the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii’s Criminal Local Rule

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3. 

# FILED

MAR 7 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

5.2 , which requires automatic filing under seal for specific categories of

documents. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, so do not recount

them here. Because Civil Beat lacks standing to file this petition, we dismiss the

case for lack of jurisdiction.

1. Civil Beat does not meet Article III’ s injury

- in

- fact requirement.

Parties must have standing to petition this court for a writ of mandamus. See

U nited States v. Mindel , 80 F.3d 394, 398 (9th Cir. 1996) ; U nited States v.

Sherman , 581 F.2d 1358, 1360

– 61 ( 9th Cir. 1978)

. Civil Beat bears the burden of

establishing standing because it is the party invoking federal jurisdiction. See

Lopez v. Candaele , 630 F.3d 775, 785 (9th Cir. 2010). To meet the constitutional

minimum of standing, a party must have

, inter alia

, suffered an “‘injury in fact,’

which is an actual or imminent invasion of a legally protected, concrete, and

particularized interest.” United States v. Kovall , 857 F.3d 1060, 1065 (9th Cir.

2017) ( citing Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560

– 61 (1992)).

Because Civil Beat did not file this petition as a result of being denied access

to a particular document in a particular case, n othing in the briefing or record 1

before us allows us to conclude that Civil Beat established it has suffered any

legally protected, concrete, and particularized interest. Cf. United States v.

Guerrero , 693 F.3d 990, 998

– 99 (9th Cir. 2012) (“Third parties challenging orders

1 Neither party supplemented its briefing with a record.3

denying public access to proceedings or documents do not have standing to appeal

directly .

. . [but] they may petition this Court for a writ of mandamus.” (emphasis

added) ) ; United States v. Brooklier , 685 F.2d 1162, 1165 (9th Cir. 1982)

.

2. We deny Civil Beat leave to amend the petition and supplement the

record. See Schmier v. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit , 279 F.3d 817,

824 (9th Cir. 2002) ( affirming decision to deny leave to amend where plaintiff

could not possibly have alleged injury in fact).

DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 23.2





                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement on
Form S-8 pertaining to the 1989 Long-Term  Incentive Plan and the 1995 Incentive
Plan for Non-Management Employees of Tanknology-NDE International,  Inc., of our
report  dated  March  19,  1999,  with  respect  to the  consolidated  financial
statements of Tanknology-NDE  International,  Inc. included in its Form 10-K for
the year ended  December  31,  1998,  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Austin, Texas
March 26, 1999
Exhibit 32.3





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Keith S. Franz, Chief Financial Officer, in connection with the Quarterly Report of CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                                            
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 9, 2018





/s/ Keith S. Franz


Keith S. Franz


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


CĪON Investment Corporation
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q/A of Mobetize Corp. for the quarterly period ended

December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ajay

Hans, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial

condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations

of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

Date: May 10, 2016

/s/ Ajay Hans

Ajay Hans

Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall

not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant

for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not

be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),

irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.