alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 443/2006

of 16 March 2006         

fixing the maximum export refund for butter in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 581/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 581/2004, for the tendering period ending on 14 March 2006, the maximum amount of refund for the products referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be as shown in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 March 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 March 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2)OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 64. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1239/2005 (OJ L 200, 30.7.2005, p. 32).

(3)OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1814/2005 (OJ L 292, 8.11.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2012, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy Butler, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002:



1.          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.          The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date: September 28, 2012 | By: /s/ Randy Butler   
|------------------------ | -----------------------
|                         | Randy Butler           
|                         | Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6994

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BEATRIZ CORPORAN-CUEVAS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Hebert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-92-409-WMN, CA-00-2665-HNM) Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 27, 2001 Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Beatriz Corporan-Cuevas, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Beatriz Corporan-Cuevas seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Corporan-Cuevas , Nos. CR92-409-WMN; CA-00-2665-HNM (D. Md. filed May 18, 2001; entered May 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
The Board of Directors
Mid-Coast Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-
KSB) of Mid-Coast Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated May 1, 1998, included in 
the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of Mid-Coast Bancorp, Inc. We also 
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 33-69194) pertaining to the 1989 Stock Option Plan of Mid-
Coast Bancorp, Inc. and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-
49003) pertaining to the Recognition and Retention Plan of Mid-Coast 
Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated May 1, 1998, with respect to the 
consolidated financial statements of Mid-Coast Bancorp, Inc. incorporated by 
reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended March 31, 
1998.



                                       /s/ Baker Newman & Noyes
                                       Limited Liability Company

Portland, Maine
June 26, 1998
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Intelligence AgencyCOMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN DEFENSE OF THE NATION

Search
Search

Search
                    - Facilities Operating Status
                    - Employee Resources

-  Home		 
-  About    -  FAQs             
  -  Organization      -  Locations             
    -  Missile and Space Intelligence Center             
    -  Joint Military Attache School             
    -  Joint Military Intelligence Training Center 
  -  Open Source Intelligence             
  -  Equal Opportunity & Diversity             
  -  History      -  DIA Museum             
    -  George Washington Letters             
    -  Directors of DIA             
    -  The Historians 
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response             
  -  Contact Us 
-  News & Features    -  Articles             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  Videos             
  -  DIA in the News             
  -  Threat Reports             
  -  Photo Gallery             
  -  No FEAR             
  -  Podcasts 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Career Fields      -  Analysis             
    -  Counterintelligence             
    -  Finance & Acquisition             
    -  Human Intelligence             
    -  Human Services             
    -  Information Technology             
    -  Inspector General             
    -  Legal             
    -  Mission Management             
    -  Office Management & Infrastructure             
    -  Science & Technology             
    -  Security 
  -  Search Vacancies             
  -  Apply to DIA             
  -  Hiring Process             
  -  Internships             
  -  Veteran Programs 
-  Business    -  Contractor Personnel Security             
  -  SIA3             
  -  SITE III             
  -  Innovation             
  -  NeedipeDIA             
  -  Office of Small Business Programs             
  -  Small Business FAQs 

HOMENEWS & FEATURES

Search

Search

                            - All Images 
                            - Other 

                            - Upload Date
                            - Photo Date
                            - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.4 MB)

Tags:Robins AFB, RAFB, SR71, absolute speed record, July 28 1976, Museum Of Aviation, USAF, aircraft, Robins Air Force Base, jet, Warner Robins

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 505/2006

of 29 March 2006         

amending Regulation (EC) No 27/2006 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the export of common wheat held by the German intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 27/2006 is hereby replaced by the following:

‘Article 2

The invitation to tender shall cover a maximum of 1 500 000 tonnes of common wheat for export to third countries with the exception of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Liechtenstein, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro (*1) and Switzerland.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 6, 11.1.2006, p. 15. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 311/2006 (OJ L 52, 23.2.2006, p. 10).

----
Exhibit 31.02
                                                                 -------------
                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Debi B. Halbert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Alternative Asset Growth Fund,
L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
     to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
     its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
     most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
     case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
     likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
     financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 30, 2005



/s/ Debi B. Halbert

-----------------------------------------

Debi B. Halbert, Chief Financial Officer
ProFutures, Inc., General Partner
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

** PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

I, Mark Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President, in connection with the Quarterly Reportof CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     The QuarterlyReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:May 11, 2016

 

|   |                                                                                                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Mark Gatto

Mark  Gatto  Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President

*(Principal Executive Officer)* |
|   | CĪON  Investment Corporation                                                                         |

 

 

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.9 MB)

Tags:Elks, Loglines, Defense Supply Center Richmond, november 2018

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President, in connection with the Quarterly Report of CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: June 10, 2013
  /s/ Michael A. Reisner

Michael A. Reisner

Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President

(Principal Executive Officer)

CĪON Investment Corporation
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20339 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR HERNAN-ARROYO, also known as Oscar Hernan-Mora, also known as Oscar Arroyo, also known as Oscar Arroyo Mora,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-579-1

-------------------- September 20, 2001 Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Oscar Hernan-Arroyo (“Hernan”) pleaded guilty to

conspiracy, thr ee counts of transferring false social security

cards, one count of knowingly possessing a counterfeit alienregistration card, and two counts of being present in the United

States, without consent from the Attorney General, following

deportation. He was sentenced to 78 months’ imprisonment and

appeals his sentence. Hernan asserts that the district court erred

in declining to g rant him a reduction pursuant to U.S.S.G.No. 00-20339 -2-

§3E1.1(a) and (b). Interpreting defense counsel’s comments during

the sentencing hearing liberally, we believe he pre served this

issue for appeal. Based on the deference afforded sentencing

courts in determining a defendant’s acceptance of responsibility,

however, the district court did not err by finding that Hernan’s

statements were insufficient to warrant a reduction for acceptance

of responsibility. United States v. Cano-Guel , 167 F.3d 900, 906

(5th Cir. 1999).

Hernan also contends that a prior felony conviction that

resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was

an element of the off ense that should have been charged in the

indictment. Hernan acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States
,

523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme

Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey
,

530 U.S. 466 (2000).

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. S ee Apprendi

,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit

, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th

Cir. 2000), cert. denied

, 121 S.Ct. 1214 (2001). Hernan’s argument

is foreclosed.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1286 CA 16-00664 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, DEJOSEPH, AND CURRAN, JJ.

NAKITA HARRIS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF MYRA HARRIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

CITY OF BUFFALO, BUFFALO BOARD OF EDUCATION, BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOL #53, THE AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM AND THE DIRECTOR OF THE AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM (JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY), DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

JAMES P. DAVIS, BUFFALO, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY A. BALL, CORPORATION COUNSEL, BUFFALO (DAVID M. LEE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered May 5, 2015. The order granted the motion of defendants for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court ( see Brandy B. v Eden Cent. Sch. Dist. , 15 NY3d 297, 301-303).

Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Order entered December 20, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00619-CV

LYNDON THOMPSON AND PAULA THOMPSON, Appellants

V.

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIET FSB AS OWNER TRUSTEE OF 

THE RESIDENTAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-00129-B

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ December 19, 2022 second motion for 

extension of time to file their brief. We GRANT the motion to the extent we

ORDER the brief be filed no later than January 30, 2023. Because the brief was 

first due November 30, 2022, we caution appellants that further extension requests 

will be disfavored. 

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
#### STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. James M. LEVINE, Respondent.

OBAD No. 939.

SCBD No. 3619.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 24, 1990.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the agreed recommendation for discipline submitted by the Oklahoma Bar Association, complainant, James M. Levine, respondent, and the Professional Responsibility Tribunal, in the above styled and captioned cause, THE COURT FINDS:

> (1) The parties stipulated that the respondent had violated 5 O.S. 1981 Ch. 1, App. 3, DR 1-102(A)(5) and (6). The Oklahoma Bar Association and the respondent entered into stipulations agreeing that the respondent should receive a public reprimand.

> (2) The respondent hired his brother to work in his law firm as a legal assistant. The brother was a licensed attorney in Florida and Illinois. However, the Oklahoma Board of Bar Examiners had denied his application for admission. The respondent was aware that his brother gave legal advice and he attended a meeting at which his brother solicited and assisted prospective investors in organizing general partnerships. During *633this period of time, the brother collected $215,000.00 in attorney fees which was used to expand the law firm. Although, the firm eventually went into bankruptcy due to the additional expenses from the expansion. The brother pleaded nolo contendere to conspiracy to violate the Oklahoma Securities Act; failure to register agents and employment of unregistered agents; distribution of unfiled and unapproved sales literature; and fraud in the offer and sale of securities. He received *2lk*years on each count to run concurrently.

> (3) Because the respondent knew or should have known of his brother’s activities, and failed not only to sever his professional connections with his brother but allowed the attorneys fees his brother received to be used to enhance the respondent’s practice, the respondent has violated 5 O.S.1981 Ch. 1, App. 3, DR 1-102(A)(5) and (6).

> (4) The respondent should receive a public reprimand.

> (5) The respondent is directed to pay the costs of all proceedings in the amount of $2,561.48.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by this Court that the respondent stands reprimanded by publication of this order, and that the respondent pay the costs of all proceedings.

HARGRAVE, C.J., and HODGES, LAVENDER, KAUGER, and SUMMERS, JJ., concur.

OPALA, V.C.J., concurs in imposing discipline; dissents from administering public reprimand; I would visit a more severe sanction.

SIMMS, J., with whom ALMA WILSON, J., joins, dissenting: I would reject the stipulations and remand to the Professional Responsibility Tribunal.