alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,017,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,781,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,774,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,411,000
<PP&E>                                       6,276,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,216,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,471,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,606,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,788,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     399,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,471,000
<SALES>                                     71,454,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            71,454,000
<CGS>                                       59,314,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               65,781,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               135,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             101,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,684,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,474,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,390,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,390,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: CIVIL BEAT LAW CENTER FOR 

THE PUBLIC INTEREST, INC., 

______________________________ 

CIVIL BEAT LAW CENTER FOR THE 

PUBLIC INTEREST, INC., 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII, 

Respondent.

No. 23-70023 

MEMORANDUM*

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Argued and Submitted February 15, 2024

Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: PAEZ, M. SMITH, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest, Inc. (Civil Beat) petitions the 

court for a writ of mandamus. Civil Beat requests that the court invalidate portions 

of the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii’s Criminal Local Rule 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

FILED

MAR 7 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

5.2, which requires automatic filing under seal for specific categories of 

documents. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, so do not recount 

them here. Because Civil Beat lacks standing to file this petition, we dismiss the 

case for lack of jurisdiction. 

1. Civil Beat does not meet Article III’s injury-in-fact requirement. 

Parties must have standing to petition this court for a writ of mandamus. See 

United States v. Mindel, 80 F.3d 394, 398 (9th Cir. 1996); United States v. 

Sherman, 581 F.2d 1358, 1360–61 (9th Cir. 1978). Civil Beat bears the burden of 

establishing standing because it is the party invoking federal jurisdiction. See 

Lopez v. Candaele, 630 F.3d 775, 785 (9th Cir. 2010). To meet the constitutional 

minimum of standing, a party must have, inter alia, suffered an “‘injury in fact,’ 

which is an actual or imminent invasion of a legally protected, concrete, and 

particularized interest.” United States v. Kovall, 857 F.3d 1060, 1065 (9th Cir. 

2017) (citing Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560–61 (1992)). 

Because Civil Beat did not file this petition as a result of being denied access 

to a particular document in a particular case, nothing in the briefing or record1

before us allows us to conclude that Civil Beat established it has suffered any 

legally protected, concrete, and particularized interest. Cf. United States v. 

Guerrero, 693 F.3d 990, 998–99 (9th Cir. 2012) (“Third parties challenging orders

1 Neither party supplemented its briefing with a record. 
3 

denying public access to proceedings or documents do not have standing to appeal 

directly . . . [but] they may petition this Court for a writ of mandamus.” (emphasis 

added)); United States v. Brooklier, 685 F.2d 1162, 1165 (9th Cir. 1982). 

2. We deny Civil Beat leave to amend the petition and supplement the 

record. See Schmier v. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 279 F.3d 817, 

824 (9th Cir. 2002) (affirming decision to deny leave to amend where plaintiff 

could not possibly have alleged injury in fact). 

DISMISSED.
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 280 

Recognizing the 40th anniversary of the withdrawal of United States combat 

troops from the Vietnam War and expressing renewed support for United 

States veterans of that conflict. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 31, 2013 

Mr. THUNE (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, and Mr. MCCAIN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 40th anniversary of the withdrawal of 

United States combat troops from the Vietnam War and 

expressing renewed support for United States veterans 

of that conflict. 

Whereas the United States Armed Forces supported the 

cause of freedom in South Vietnam between October 

1955 and May 7, 1975, beginning with the commencement of the Military Assistance Advisory Group, Vietnam, with many servicemembers making the ultimate 

sacrifice; 

Whereas the United States carried out its first combat mission in Vietnam on January 12, 1962; 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 280 IS 

Whereas a total of 8,744,000 personnel served worldwide during the Vietnam War era, including 4,368,000 in the 

United States Army, 1,842,000 in the United States 

Navy, 794,000 in the United States Marine Corps, and 

1,740,000 in the United States Air Force; 

Whereas the number of United States servicemembers deployed in theater rose to a peak of 543,482 in April 

1969; 

Whereas 1,857,304 men entered military service through the 

Selective Service System between August 1964 and February 1973; 

Whereas, of the 58,220 casualties of United States personnel, 

47,434 were battle deaths; 

Whereas 153,303 wounded United States servicemembers required hospital care; 

Whereas an additional 150,341 wounded United States 

servicemembers did not require hospital care; 

Whereas 2,646 United States servicemembers went missing 

in action during the Vietnam War, of whom 1,645 are 

still unaccounted for; 

Whereas 725 United States servicemembers were taken as 

prisoners of war, with 64 dying while in internment; 

Whereas the Paris Peace Accords, signed on January 27, 

1973, put an end to the direct intervention of the United 

States in the Vietnam War; and 

Whereas the last United States combat troops left South 

Vietnam 2 months later in the spring of 1973: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 280 IS 

1 (1) the Senate honors the 40th anniversary of 

2 the withdrawal of United States combat troops from 

3 the Vietnam War; 

4 (2) the Senate renews its support for United 

5 States veterans of that conflict; and 

6 (3) when the Senate adjourns today, the Senate 

7 will stand adjourned as a further mark of respect to 

8 the memory of United States servicemembers who 

9 have given their lives in the name of service to the 

10 United States. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |

|         |                                                                                                                                                         |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                                  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                  |
|                                                             |
| Dated: August 7, 2018                                       |
|                                                             |
| /s/    Michael Hart                          |
| Michael HartChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| * | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. |
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S

N O . A P - 7 6 , 7 8 6

E X P A R T E H U G O I S R A E L M A R T I N E Z , A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R A W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U S E N O . B - 3 5 , 0 3 1
- A I N T H E 1 6 1 J U D I C I A L D I S T R I C T C O U R T S T F R O M E C T O R C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m . O P I N I O N P u rsuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Proced u re , t h e cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession with intent to deliver a c ontrolled substance and sente nced to sixt een year s’ imprisonment. Applicant contends he was denied his rig ht to appea l, beca use althoug h trial counsel timely filed a motion for new trial and was subsequently permitted to withdraw, appellate counsel was not appointed until afte r the deadline for filing the notice of appea l. We rema nded this application to the trial court f

or finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law.2

The trial court has deter

mined that Applicant was d en i ed t h e opportunity to appea l his conviction throug h no fault of his own. See Ex parte Riley , 193 S.W .3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We fi n d t h at Applicant is entitled to the opportuni ty to file an out-of-time appeal of the j udg ment of conviction in Caus e No

. B- 35,031-A from the 161st J udicial District Court of Ector County

. Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of appea l so that he may then, with the aid of c ounsel, obtain a mea ningf ul appea l. Wit hin ten day s of t he is suance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indig ent. I f Applicant is indig ent and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shal l i m m ediately appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. W e hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an appea l, he must take aff irmative steps to file a written notice of appea l in the trial court within 30 day s after the mandate of this Court issues.

Deliver ed: May

2, 2012 Do Not Publish
1

The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-2206

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Frederick Duane Fisher, * [UNPUBLISHED]

* 

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 22, 2004

Filed: February 2, 2004

___________

Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Duane Fisher appeals the restitution order imposed by the district

court1

 after he pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting an assault resulting in serious

bodily harm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 113(a)(6), 1151, and 1153(a). Fisher

does not challenge the imposition of 78 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised

release. Instead, he argues in a brief filed under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), that he should not be responsible for any funeral or burial expenses because
-2-

he was not convicted of murdering the victim. Upon review of the record, it is

apparent that he was not ordered to pay any funeral or burial expenses. Rather, the

$5,630 in restitution the district court ordered Fisher to pay to the representative of

the victim’s estate -- jointly and severally with three other individuals -- included

reimbursement only for grief counseling, lost wages, transportation, and the victim’s

coat. Fisher’s argument on appeal is therefore unfounded. 

We have reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75, 80 (1988), for any nonfrivolous issue, and we have found none.

Accordingly, we affirm. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. 

______________________________
## 倀 爀 椀 洀 愀 爀 礀 䄀 爀 攀 愀 漀 昀 伀 瀀 攀 爀 愀 琀 椀 漀 渀 猀

渀 漀 琀 琀 漀 椀 渀 挀 氀 甀 搀 攀 爀 攀 猀 琀 爀 椀 挀 琀 攀 搀 愀 爀 攀 愀 猀 

## 䔀 砀 琀 攀 渀 搀 攀 搀 䄀 爀 攀 愀 漀 昀 伀 瀀 攀 爀 愀 琀 椀 漀 渀 猀

渀 漀 琀 琀 漀 椀 渀 挀 氀 甀 搀 攀 爀 攀 猀 琀 爀 椀 挀 琀 攀 搀 愀 爀 攀 愀 猀
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


   EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE 



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      Year-Ended December 31,
                              ----------------------------------------
                              1994            1995               1996
                              -----           -----             ------
<S>                           <C>             <C>               <C>

Continuing Operations         $0.34           $0.42             $(0.15)
Discontinued Operations         --              --               (1.00)
                              -----           -----             ------
                                      
                              $0.34           $0.42             $(1.15)
                              =====           =====             ======

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Garth Likes, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cyplasin Biomedical Ltd. for the period ended July 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cyplasin Biomedical Ltd.                                                          

|Dated: September 12, 2008 | /s/ Garth Likes                                          
|------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                          | Garth
Likes                                              
|                          | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director          
|                          | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer
|                          | and
Principal Accounting Officer)                        
|                          | Cyplasin Biomedical Ltd.                                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Cyplasin Biomedical Ltd. and will be retained by Cyplasin Biomedical Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

SMALL ELECTRIC MOTORS

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20585

Room 1E-245

September 13, 2007

Purpose

The Department is holding this informal public meeting as a first step in the standards

rulemaking process for small electric motors. This meeting is intended to familiarize

interested stakeholders with the approach and analytical tools that the DOE proposes to

use in its analysis for proposed standards for these motors. The meeting will solicit

feedback on the assumptions, methodology, and analytical tools DOE proposes to use in

this rulemaking.

Agenda

9:00 - 9:05 am Welcome

9:05 - 9:20 am Introduction, agenda review, and opening remarks

Antonio Bouza

9:20 - 9 : 30 am Rulemaking overview and analytical methodology

Antonio Bouza

ANOPR ANALYSIS

9:30 - 10 : 30 am Market and Technology Assessment

Mahima Gupta

10:30 - 10:45 am Break

10:45 - 11:30 am Screening Analysis, Engineering Analysis, and Preliminary

Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Mahima Gupta and Michael Scholand

11:30 - 12:00 am Discussion of Pertinent Issues

12:00 - 1:00 pm Break for Lunch (on your own)

 EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 03.2
1:00 - 1:45 pm Markups for Equipment Price Determination, Energy Use and

End-Use Load Characterization, and Life-Cycle Cost and

Payback Period Analysis

Robert Van Buskirk

1:45 - 2:15 pm Shipments Analysis and National Impact Analysis

Robert Van Buskirk

2:15 - 2:45 pm Discussion of Pertinent Issues

2:45 - 3:00 pm Break

NOPR ANALYSIS

3:00 - 3:30 pm Revisions to ANOPR analyses and LCC Subgroup Analysis,

Manufacturer Impact Analysis

3:30 - 4:00 pm Utility Impact Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis,

Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Impact Analysis

Robert Van Buskirk

FINAL RULE

4:00 - 5:00 pm Other Issues and Comments, Closing Remarks

 EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 03.2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.2 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2.37 MB)

Tags:673d Logistic Readiness Squadron, MATERIEL MANAGEMENT, 673d LRS, 673d Logistics Readiness Group, JBER

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery