alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TIMOTHY BING, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1957

[July 30, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Glenn D. Kelley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502017CF006413A.

Jack A. Fleischman of Fleischman & Fleischman, P.A., West Palm 

Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lindsey A. Warner, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY, JJ., and HILAL, JENNIFER, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 7TH DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNT Y, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 3 1st
day of March, 2015 , the cause up on appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

SHANNA SUZANNE WICK , Appellant

NO. 12

- 15

- 00064

- CR; Trial Court No. 007

- 0663

- 13

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in the se words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGE D and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction ; and that this decision be certified to

the court below for observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, wi th the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyler, this the 26 th day of Ma y , 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James Sammon, hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Greenwind NRG Inc. for the period
          ended  April  30,  2013  (the   "Report")   fully  complies  with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Greenwind NRG Inc.

Dated: June 26, 2013

                                         /s/ James Sammon
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         James Sammon
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)
                                         Greenwind NRG Inc.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906, has been  provided to  Greenwind  NRG Inc. and will be
retained by Greenwind  NRG Inc. and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Benjamin Ibelli, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

November 26, 1958.

*500
      *George F. Beits*for petitioners.

*Theodora W. Joven*for Anna Ibelli and others, respondents.

Maximilian Moss, S.

Testator gave Ms residuary estate in trust for the lifetime benefit of his wife, and upon her death in further trust for the benefit of his children until each arrived at the age of 26, when each was to be paid his or her distributive share. Testator’s wife predeceased him. He was survived by 10 children, 2 of whom had not attained their 26th birthday. Their respective shares, therefore, were to have been placed in separate trusts, under article “ TMrd ” of the will, until each reached the specified age. The other children, including Lucia, were each entitled to their share of the residuary estate as they were over 26 years old when testator died. The absolute gift of principal to Lucia, as a child of testator, under article “Third” of the will was not cut down by article “Sixth” thereof as article ‘ ‘ Fifth ’ ’ clearly evinces the primary purpose of the children’s trusts was the creation of a fund to educate them.

Under article “ Fourth ” of the will, the trustee and executors were given the power to sell all realty, which power is construed to have survived the termination of the two trusts for testator’s children *(Cussack*v. *Tweedy,*126 N. Y. 81; *Matter of Jones,*306 N. Y. 197), so as to permit distribution to all of the legatees. *501The nominated trustee having qualified as executor and the executors not having accounted, letters of trusteeship will issue to the said nominated trustee upon qualifying according to law. The power of sale granted under article *“*Fourth ” however, will be exercisable solely by the named trustee upon qualifying.

The respondents’ objections to the issuance of letters of trusteeship and to the exercise of the power of sale are dismissed, as is also their alternative prayer that the realty be sold as one parcel, which is a discretionary matter determinable by the trustee. The testator exonerated the executors and trustee from the requirement of posting bonds under article *“*Seventh ” of his will, therefore the respondents’ objection that they post bonds is dismissed (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 169).

Settle order on notice.
/ 

CO CLINTO N 

COUNT Y ECONOMIC "msmm 

ALLIANCE 

:v',RTfv<ENT OF 

SPQRWIGIv 

:i Of'ERsjIONS 

m l';3 22 P 2: 32 

12800 Escanaba Drive, Suite D 

DeWitt, Ml 48820 

517-669-1345 

www.cceami.orq 

February 17,2012 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Ref: Sun Country Slot Exemption - Docket Number FAA-2012-0089 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Through no fault of its own, the Lansing, Michigan region may lose the only large aircraft service (737-800) 

to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) in the State of Michigan outside of Detroit. 

On January 6, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated a DOT order 

exempting Sun Country Airlines from the slot limit at DCA. The two slots that were used by Sun Country, 

which was not involved in the court decision, for its Lansing Capital Region International Airport (LAN) 

service to DCA were ordered to be given to another airline. 

As in many cases, there was an unintended consequence. Unless at least one daily slot is provided to Sun 

Country during each of the 1000 and 1100 hours at DCA, the airline will have no choice but to discontinue 

air service between Lansing and Washington, DC. 

This is no small loss for the residents of the Easing area. The Lansing - East Lansing region is not only the 

state capital of Michigan and home to the majority of government officials and state employees, it is also 

home to Michigan State University, one of the top research institutions in the country. Research and other 

grants to MSU from top federal funding agencies such as the National Science Foundation, the U.S. 

Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the U.S. Department of 

Agriculture totaled $495 million in the 2009 - 10 school year. 

Without the two replacement slots at DCA, our government officials, university researchers, and business 

people from the high tech companies spawned locally by MSU and its research capabilities who deal 

regularly with federal agencies will be forced to drive two hours to Detroit for regular air service. 

The Lansing business and civic community has worked very hard to attract Sun Country Airlines to Lansing 

Capital Region International Airport. Please don't defeat that effort by taking this air service away. 

Sincerely, 

rs 

Brian Coughlin 

President & CEO
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 7TH DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 31st

day of March, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

SHANNA SUZANNE WICK, Appellant

NO. 12-15-00064-CR; Trial Court No. 007-0663-13

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, 

it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the 

appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, 

and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to 

the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 26th day of May, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 69 SSM 43 In the Matter of County of Broome, Respondent, v. Nirav R. Shah, &c., et al., Appellants.

Submitted by Victor Paladino, for appellants. Respondent, precluded.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, without costs, petition dismissed in its entirety, and a declaration made in favor of respondents Nirav R. Shah, &c., et al. that section 61 of part D of Chapter 56 of the Laws of 2012 has not been shown to be unconstitutional (see Matter of County of Chemung v Shah, 28 NY3d 244 [2016]). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Garcia and Wilson concur. Judges Stein and Fahey took no part.
Decided February 16, 2017
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of TMX Finance LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Tracy Young, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    TRACY
YOUNG     
|Tracy Young            
|Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2011
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (8.01 MB)

Tags:Feds Feed Families, food drive

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION





I, W. Pierce Carson, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Azco Mining Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure rules and procedures, or caused such disclosure rules and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers control over internal reporting.



Date:  December 20, 2005



/s/ W. Pierce Carson

W. Pierce Carson

Chief Financial Officer
#### Howard, Admr., Appellant, *v.*The Pennsylvania Rd. Co., Appellee.

(No. 30811

Decided November 13, 1946.)

*Mr. Hugh Huntington*and *Mr. E. D. Howard,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Burr, Porter,< Stanley é Treffinger,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Bell, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Turner, J., not participating.
## Adams, Kevin (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments:
Hi All, Adams, Kevin (OST) Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:43 AM Charity Speich (charityspeich@chippewavalleyairport.com); Mike Huggins (CityHaII@EauClaireWI.gov) Brad Rawson (brad.rawson@skywest.com) Request for Comment rethe proposal of SkyWest at EauClaire (the only carrier to bid) Proposal, SkyWest, EauClaire.pdf

Attached above isa copy of the one timely-filed proposal for Essential Air Service (EAS)at EauClaire, submitted by SkyWest. We are currently reviewing those proposals. The attached proposal isdirectly from the rier and will soon be reflected in the Docket, which you may access through Regulations.gov at DOT-OST-2009-0306, along with other pertinent information on this proceeding. The next~tep in the carrier-selection process isfor you to provide uswith your community's comments, a critically important element in our c.arrier-selection decision, especially the comments of civic officials. Accordingly, Iaskthat everyone get back to us, preferably by email, no later than August 13, 2013. We will docket this email, aswell asany replies. -Inbrief, look at the proposal, and if you have any questions, call me, and get back to us bythe deadline, August 13. \

... Best,
Kevin Adams 202-366-1047



# --'

1
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11115 Summary Calendar

KESHA TERRY , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
SUPERVISOR AND DETENTION WORKERS , Defendant s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CV

- 4

Before DENNIS, HAYNES , and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM : * Kesha Terry moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. She has also filed a motion to amend her complaint. By moving this court for leave to proceed IFP, Terry is challenging the district court’s determination that her appeal is no t taken in good faith. Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 26, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11115 Document: 00515090917 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/26/2019No. 18

- 11115

2 “This [c]ourt must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). Because Terry did not file a timely notice of appeal from the district court’s denial of her post

judgment motion styled as a motion to reopen and for clarification, this court lacks jurisdiction over the instant appeal. See id .; F ED

. R. A PP . P. 4(a)(1)(A). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Terry’s
IF P motion is DENIED as MOOT . Her motion to amend her complaint is
DENIED. Case: 18-11115 Document: 00515090917 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/26/2019
#### Brandt L. HARRIS, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. The UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING; Brian Miracle; Donald E. Chapin; Terry Roark; Robert Houston; Roland Braden; James Hurst; Walter Eggars; Lee Schick; Dennis Tool; Janet Constantanides, Appellees (Defendants).

No. 88-318.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

March 14, 1989.

Brandt L. Harris*, pro se.

James R. Bell of Murane & Bostwick, Casper, for appellees.

Before CARDINE, C.J., and THOMAS, URBIGKIT, MACY and GOLDEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Brandt L. Harris filed a claim for damages against appellees, University of Wyoming, Brian Miracle, Donald E. Cha-pin, Terry Roark, Robert Houston, Roland Barden, James Hurst, Walter Eggars, Lee Schick, Dennis Tool, and Janet Constantan-ides, based upon his receiving a failing grade in a course at the university. The complaint was dismissed by the district court for lack of jurisdiction.

In the appeal to this court, the appellant seeks to have a reversal of the district court decision. The merits have been considered in detail and the decision of the district court is affirmed. We concur with the citation of authority provided in the order of dismissal entered by the district court. See *Sowerwine v. State,*767 P.2d 181 (Wyo.1989) and *Nollsch v. State,*768 P.2d 603 (Wyo.1989).

Affirmed.
V/^RTMENTOF 

: • '\NSPORWIOM 

MICHAE L R BEL L . .--S DPERATIOMS 

MAYO R 

m m '^0 p 2-0 

Aloha Ley 

Small Community Air Service Development Program 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

July 27, 2011 

Director Ley: 

Over the past decade Toledo Express Airport has suffered from a significant decline in its 

air service, and airline capacity at Toledo Express is down more than 70% from 2003. 

I am writing this letter to show my support for Toledo Express Airport and their 

application fora Small Community Air Service Development Program Grant. 

This grant would be used to attract new air service for Toledo Express and to improve air 

service needs to our communities'. 

With a commitment to match the grant funding with significant local cash and in-kind 

matches, Toledo Express Airport and its partners are throwing their fiill support behind 

establishing a comprehensive new air service incentive program which includes ground 

handling support and start-up phase fee waivers. The combination of the grant supported 

marketing and promotional ftmding and the incentive programs will provide Toledo 

Express the resources it needs to bolster local air travel demand and to re-establish some 

of the air service that has been lost in recent years. 

As a member of the Toledo Region, I sfrongly urge you to give the Toledo Small 

Community Grant Application favorable consideration. 

Sincerely, 

wms 

•t^^^t>2 

One Government Center Suite 2200 Toledo, Ohio 43604 

Office (419)245-1004 Fax (419)245-1370 

E-mail mayor@toledo.oh.gov