10530 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2012 / Notices 

the use of appropriate technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

April 23, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

identified by Information Collection 

9000–0043, Delivery Schedules by any 

of the following methods: 

• Regulations.gov: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Submit comments 

via the Federal eRulemaking portal by 

inputting ‘‘Information Collection 9000– 

0043, Delivery Schedules’’ under the 

heading ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID’’ and 

selecting ‘‘Search’’. Select the link 

‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds 

with ‘‘Information Collection 9000– 

0043, Delivery Schedules’’. Follow the 

instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a 

Comment’’ screen. Please include your 

name, company name (if any), and 

‘‘Information Collection 9000–0043, 

Delivery Schedules’’ on your attached 

document. 

• Fax: 202–501–4067. 

• Mail: General Services 

Administration, Regulatory Secretariat 

(MVCB), 1275 First Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20417. Attn: Hada 

Flowers/IC 9000–0043, Delivery 

Schedules. 

Instructions: Please submit comments 

only and cite Information Collection 

9000–0043, Delivery Schedules, in all 

correspondence related to this 

collection. All comments received will 

be posted without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal and/or business confidential 

information provided. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Anthony Robinson, Procurement 

Analyst, Federal Acquisition Policy 

Division, GSA (202) 501–2568 or via 

email at Anthony.robinson@gsa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Purpose 

The time of delivery or performance 

is an essential contract element and 

must be clearly stated in solicitations 

and contracts. The contracting officer 

may set forth a required delivery 

schedule or may allow an offeror to 

propose an alternate delivery schedule, 

for other than those for construction and 

architect-engineering, by inserting in 

solicitations and contracts a clause 

substantially the same as either FAR 

52.211–8, Time of Delivery, or FAR 

52.211–9, Desired and Required Time of 

Delivery. The information is needed to 

assure supplies or services are obtained 

in a timely manner. 

B. Annual Reporting Burden 

Respondents: 3,440. 

Responses per Respondent: 5. 

Annual Responses: 17,200. 

Hours per Response: .167. 

Total Burden Hours: 2,872. 

Obtaining Copies of Proposals: 

Requesters may obtain a copy of the 

information collection documents from 

the General Services Administration, 

Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 

First Street NE., Washington, DC 20417, 

telephone (202) 501–4755. Please cite 

OMB Control No. 9000–0043, Delivery 

Schedules, in all correspondence. 

Dated: February 14, 2012. 

Laura Auletta, 

Director, Office of Governmentwide 

Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition 

Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2012–4088 Filed 2–21–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

[Document Identifier: OS–0990–0376; 30- 

day notice] 

Agency Information Collection 

Request; 30-Day Public Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS. 

In compliance with the requirement 

of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 

Office of the Secretary (OS), Department 

of Health and Human Services, is 

publishing the following summary of a 

proposed collection for public 

comment. Interested persons are invited 

to send comments regarding this burden 

estimate or any other aspect of this 

collection of information, including any 

of the following subjects: (1) The 

necessity and utility of the proposed 

information collection for the proper 

performance of the agency’s functions; 

(2) the accuracy of the estimated 

burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (4) the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology to 

minimize the information collection 

burden. 

To obtain copies of the supporting 

statement and any related forms for the 

proposed paperwork collections 

referenced above, email your request, 

including your address, phone number, 

OMB number, and OS document 

identifier, to Sherette.funncoleman@

hhs.gov, or call the Reports Clearance 

Office on (202) 690–5683. Send written 

comments and recommendations for the 

proposed information collections within 

30 days of this notice directly to the OS 

OMB Desk Officer; faxed to OMB at 

202–395–5806. 

Proposed Project: Generic Clearance 

for Communications Testing for 

Comprehensive Communication 

Campaign for HITECH Act—Revision— 

OMB No. 0990–0376—Office of the 

National Coordinator for Health 

Information Technology (ONC). 

Abstract: As part of the Health 

Information Technology for Economic 

and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) of 

2009, ONC is proposing to conduct a 

nationwide communication campaign to 

meet the Congressional mandate to 

educate the public about privacy and 

security of electronically exchanged 

personal health information. ONC 

requires formative and process 

information about different segments of 

the public to conduct the campaign 

effectively. Data collection will occur 

continuously through the 24 months of 

the campaign and be used to inform 

campaign strategies, messages, materials 

and Web sites. Due to the growing use 

of mobile devices in exchanging 

personal health information 

electronically, ONC is proposing a 

revision of the currently approved 

collection to increase focus group 

burden hours and explore consumer 

attitudes and preferences regarding the 

communication of personal health 

information electronically using mobile 

devices. Additionally, an increase in 

burden hours is necessary to understand 

attitudes and preferences regarding how 

privacy and security information is 

presented to consumers electronically. 

ONC is collaborating with the HHS 

Office of Civil Rights to oversee the 

education and communication activities 

to build approval for HIT adoption and 

meaningful use, educate the public 

about privacy and security and increase 

participation in health information 

exchange. 

Electronic health information 

exchange promises an array of potential 

benefits for individuals and the U.S. 

health care system through improved 

health care quality, safety, and 

efficiency. At the same time, this 

environment also poses new challenges 

and opportunities for protecting health 

information, including methods for 

individuals to engage with their health 

care providers and affect how their 

health information may be exchanged. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2012 / Notices 10531 

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE

Forms Type of respondent Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Average burden 

per response 

(in hours) 

Total 

burden 

hours 

Focus Group ................................. General Public .............................. 621 1 1.5 932 

Focus Group screening ................ General Public .............................. 5,544 1 10/60 924 

Web usability testing ..................... General Public .............................. 144 1 1.5 216 

Web usability screening ................ General Public .............................. 2,160 1 10/60 360 

Self-Administered Surveys ............ General Public .............................. 2,000 1 15/60 500 

Self-Administered survey screening.General Public .............................. 8,000 1 10/60 1,333 

Omnibus Surveys .......................... General Public .............................. 2,000 1 10/60 333 

Cognitive testing ........................... General Public .............................. 25 1 2 50 

Focus Group ................................. Health Professional ...................... 288 1 1.5 432 

Screening ...................................... Health Professional ...................... 4,320 1 10/60 720 

Web usability testing ..................... Health Professional ...................... 144 1 1.5 216 

Screening ...................................... Health Professional ...................... 2,160 1 10/60 360 

Self-Administered Surveys ............ Health Professional ...................... 2,000 1 15/60 500 

Screening ...................................... Health Professional ...................... 8,000 1 10/60 1,333 

Omnibus Surveys .......................... Health Professional ...................... 2,000 1 10/60 333 

In-Depth Interviews ....................... Health Professional ...................... 100 1 45/60 75 

Screening ...................................... Health Professional ...................... 1,000 1 10/60 167 

Total (Overall) ........................ ....................................................... 40,506 .......................... .......................... 8,784 

Keith A. Tucker, 

Office of the Secretary, Paperwork Reduction 

Act Reports Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2012–4033 Filed 2–21–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Administration for Children and 

Families 

Proposed Information Collection 

Activity; Comment Request 

Title: Permanency Innovations 

Initiative Evaluation: Phase I. 

OMB No.: New collection. 

Description: The Administration for 

Children and Families (ACF), U.S. 

Department of Health and Human 

Services (HHS) intends to collect data 

for an evaluation of the Permanency 

Innovations Initiative (PII). This 5-year 

initiative, funded by the Children’s 

Bureau (CB) within ACF, is intended to 

build the evidence base for innovative 

interventions that enhance well-being 

and improve permanency outcomes for 

particular groups of children and youth 

who are at risk for long-term foster care 

and who experience the most serious 

barriers to timely permanency. 

Six grantees are funded to identify 

local barriers to permanent placement 

and implement innovative strategies 

that mitigate or eliminate those barriers 

and reduce the likelihood that children 

will remain in foster care for three years 

or longer. The first year of the initiative 

focused on clarifying grantees’ target 

populations and intervention programs. 

In addition, evaluation plans were 

developed to support rigorous sitespecific and cross-site studies to 

document the implementation and 

effectiveness of the grantees’ projects 

and the initiative overall. 

Data collection for the PII evaluation 

includes a number of components being 

launched at different points in time. The 

purpose of the current document is to 

request approval of data collection 

efforts needed for a first phase of data 

collection and to request a waiver for 

subsequent 60 day notices for later 

components of the evaluation. The first 

phase includes data collection for a 

cross-site implementation evaluation 

and site-specific evaluations of two PII 

grantees (Washoe County, Nevada, and 

the State of Kansas) that will begin 

implementing interventions during the 

second year of the PII grant period. The 

second phase includes a cost evaluation 

and site-specific evaluations of four PII 

grantees expected to implement 

interventions in the third year of the PII 

grant period. 

Data for the evaluations will be 

collected through: (1) Direct assessment 

of caregivers; (2) service providers’ 

clinical assessments of children and 

families; (3) interviews and focus groups 

with grantee staff during site visits and 

through telephone interviews; (4) webbased data collection from service 

providers and key informants; and (5) 

retrieval and submission of data from 

grantee data systems. 

Respondents: Children and their 

parents or permanent or foster 

caregivers, caseworkers, supervisors, 

service providers, and key informants 

such as grantee project directors, data 

managers, and representatives of partner 

agencies. 

ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES

Instrument 

Annual 

number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Average 

burden hours 

per response 

Total annual 

burden hours 

CROSS-SITE IMPLEMENTATION STUDY 

Baseline Survey of Organization/System Readiness .................................. 60 1 .75 45 

Implementation Drivers Web Survey ........................................................... 150 2 .0 .75 225 

Grantee Case Study Field Visit Discussion Guide ...................................... 60 1 2 .0 120 

Fidelity Data (Implementation Quotient Tracker) ......................................... 2 8 1 .5 24 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES