Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Proposed Rules 9877 

last 21 NM of the airway; terminating 

the route at the existing RUGBB fix, 

shared with V–502. Ending the modified 

V–508 at the RUGBB fix would provide 

eastbound IFR aircraft with the ability to 

continue to destinations further east or 

northeast via transition from V–508 to 

V–502. 

VOR Federal airways are published in 

paragraph 6010(a) of FAA Order 

7400.9V dated August 9, 2011, and 

effective September 15, 2011, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The VOR Federal Airways listed in 

this document would be subsequently 

published in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. 

Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) 

Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that will only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this proposed rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 

40103. Under that section, the FAA is 

charged with prescribing regulations to 

assign the use of the airspace necessary 

to ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it proposes to modify VOR Federal 

Airways in the vicinity of Olathe, KS. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures,’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of the FAA Order 7400.9V, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 9, 2011, and 

effective September 15, 2011, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR federal 

airways. 

* * * * * 

V–10 [Amended] 

From Pueblo, CO; 18 miles, 48 miles, 60 

MSL, Lamar, CO; Garden City, KS; Dodge 

City, KS; Hutchinson, KS; Emporia, KS; INT 

Emporia 063°(T)/055°(M) and Napoleon, MO, 

242°(T)/235°(M) radials; Napoleon; 

Kirksville, MO; Burlington, IA; Bradford, IL; 

to INT Bradford 058° and Joliet, IL, 287° 

radials. From INT Chicago Heights, IL, 358° 

and Gipper, MI, 271° radials; Gipper; 

Litchfield, MI; INT Litchfield 101° and 

Carleton, MI, 262° radials; Carleton; INT 

Jefferson, OH, 279° and Youngstown, OH, 

320° radials; Youngstown; INT Youngstown 

116° and Revloc, PA, 300° radials; Revloc; 

INT Revloc 107° and Lancaster, PA, 280° 

radials; to Lancaster. The airspace within 

Canada is excluded. 

* * * * * 

V–12 [Amended] 

From Gaviota, CA; San Marcus, CA; 

Palmdale, CA; 38 miles, 6 miles wide, 

Hector, CA; 12 miles, 38 miles, 85 MSL, 

14 miles, 75 MSL, Needles, CA; 45 miles, 34 

miles, 95 MSL, Drake, AZ; Winslow, AZ; 30 

miles, 85 MSL, Zuni, NM; Albuquerque, NM; 

Otto, NM; Anton Chico, NM; Tucumcari, 

NM; Amarillo, TX; Mitbee, OK; Anthony, KS; 

Wichita, KS; Emporia, KS; INT Emporia 

063°(T)/055°(M) and Napoleon, MO, 242°(T)/ 

235°(M) radials; Napoleon; INT Napoleon 

095° and Columbia, MO, 292° radials; 

Columbia; Foristell, MO; Troy, IL; Bible 

Grove, IL; Shelbyville, IN; Richmond, IN; 

Dayton, OH; Appleton, OH; Newcomerstown, 

OH; Allegheny, PA; Johnstown, PA; 

Harrisburg, PA; INT Harrisburg 092° and 

Pottstown, PA, 278° radials; to Pottstown. 

* * * * * 

V–508 [Amended] 

From Hill City, KS; Hays, KS; Salina, KS, 

INT Salina 082° and Manhattan, KS, 207° 

radials; Manhattan; INT Manhattan 078° and 

Topeka, KS, 293° radials; Topeka; to INT 

Topeka 112°(T)/107°(M) and Kansas City, 

MO, 228°(T)/223°(M) radials. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on February 9, 

2012. 

Gary A. Norek, 

Acting Manager, Airspace, Regulations & ATC 

Procedures Group. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3820 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

26 CFR Part 1 

[REG–130302–10] 

RIN 1545–BJ69 

Reporting of Specified Foreign 

Financial Assets; Correction 

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: This document contains 

corrections to a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (REG–130302–10), which 

was published in the Federal Register 

on Monday, December 19, 2011, relating 

to the reporting of specified foreign 

financial assets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joseph S. Henderson (202) 622–3880 

(not a toll-free number). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The notice of proposed rulemaking 

that is the subject of these corrections 

are under section 6038 of the Internal 

Revenue Code. 

Need for Correction 

As published on December 19, 2011, 

(76 FR 78594), the notice of proposed 

rulemaking (REG–130302–10), contains 

errors which may prove to be 

misleading and are in need of 

clarification. 

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1 

Income taxes, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

PART 1—INCOME TAXES 

Paragraph 1. The authority citation 

for part 1 continues to read in part as 

follows: 

Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
9878 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

PART 1—[CORRECTED] 

Par. 2. Section 1.6038D–6 is amended 

by revising paragraph (d)(3) to read as 

follows: 

§ 1.6038D–6 Specified domestic entities. 

* * * * * 

(d) * * * 

(3) * * * A trust described in section 

7701(a)(30)(E) to the extent such trust or 

any portion thereof is treated as owned 

by one or more specified persons under 

sections 671 through 678 and the 

regulations issued under those sections. 

* * * * * 

Guy R. Traynor, 

Federal Register Liaison, Legal Processing 

Division, Publications and Regulations Br., 

Procedure and Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3933 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

28 CFR Part 16 

[CPCLO Order No. 003–2012] 

Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation 

AGENCY: Department of Justice. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: Elsewhere in the Federal 

Register, the Department of Justice (DOJ 

or Department) has published a notice 

of a new Department-wide Privacy Act 

system of records, Debt Collection 

Enforcement System, JUSTICE/DOJ– 

016. In this notice of proposed 

rulemaking, the DOJ proposes to exempt 

certain records in this system from 

certain provisions of the Privacy Act in 

order to avoid interference with the law 

enforcement functions and 

responsibilities of the DOJ. Public 

comment is invited. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

March 22, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Address all comments to 

the Department of Justice, ATTN: 

Privacy Analyst, Office of Privacy and 

Civil Liberties, National Place Building, 

1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 

1000, Washington, DC 20530, or 

facsimile (202) 307–0693. To ensure 

proper handling, please reference the 

CPCLO Order number in your 

correspondence. You may review an 

electronic version of the proposed rule 

at http://www.regulations.gov. You may 

also submit a comment via the Internet 

by emailing DOJPrivacyActProposed

Regulations@usdoj.gov or by using the 

comment form for this regulation at 

http://www.regulation.gov. Please 

include the CPCLO Order number in the 

subject box. 

Please note that the Department is 

requesting that electronic comments be 

submitted before midnight Eastern 

standard time on the day the comment 

period closes because http:// 

www.regulations.gov terminates the 

public’s ability to submit comments at 

that time. Commenters in time zones 

other than Eastern standard time may 

want to consider this so that their 

electronic comments are received. All 

comments sent via regular or express 

mail will be considered timely if 

postmarked on the day the comment 

period closes. 

Posting of Public Comments: Please 

note that all comments received are 

considered part of the public record and 

made available for public inspection 

online at http://www.regulations.gov 

and in the Department’s public docket. 

Such information includes personally 

identifying information (such as your 

name, address, etc.) voluntarily 

submitted by the commenter. 

If you want to submit personally 

identifying information (such as your 

name, address, etc.) as part of your 

comment but do not want it to be posted 

online or made available in the public 

docket, you must include the term 

‘‘PERSONALLY IDENTIFYING 

INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph 

of your comment. You must also place 

all the personally identifying 

information you do not want posted 

online or made available in the public 

docket in the first paragraph of your 

comment and identify what information 

you want redacted. 

If you want to submit confidential 

business information as part of your 

comment but do not want it to be posted 

online or made available in the public 

docket, you must include the term 

‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS 

INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph 

of your comment. You must also 

prominently identify confidential 

business information to be redacted 

within the comment. If a comment has 

so much confidential business 

information that it cannot be effectively 

redacted, all or part of that comment 

may not be posted online or made 

available in the public docket. 

Personally identifying information 

and confidential business information 

identified and located as set forth above 

will be redacted and the comment, in 

redacted form, will be posted online and 

placed in the Department’s public 

docket file. Please note that the Freedom 

of Information Act applies to all 

comments received. If you wish to 

inspect the agency’s public docket file 

in person by appointment, please see 

the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

paragraph. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Holley B. O’Brien, Director, Debt 

Collection Management Staff, Justice 

Management Division, Department of 

Justice, at (202) 514–5343. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Notice section of today’s Federal 

Register, the DOJ published a new 

Department-wide Privacy Act system of 

records, Debt Collection Enforcement 

System, JUSTICE/DOJ–016, to reflect the 

consolidation of the Department’s debt 

collection enforcement systems, that 

were previously maintained in various 

individual DOJ components, into a 

single, centralized system. This system 

of records is maintained by the 

Department of Justice to cover records 

used by the Department’s components 

or offices, and/or contract private 

counsel retained by DOJ to perform 

legal, financial and administrative 

services associated with the collection 

of debts due the United States, 

including related negotiation, 

settlement, litigation, and enforcement 

efforts. 

In this rulemaking, the DOJ proposes 

to exempt certain records in this Privacy 

Act system of records from certain 

provisions of the Privacy Act because 

the system contains material compiled 

for law enforcement purposes. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

This proposed rule relates to 

individuals, as opposed to small 

business entities. Pursuant to the 

requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, the 

proposed rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507(d), requires that 

the DOJ consider the impact of 

paperwork and other information 

collection burdens imposed on the 

public. There are no current or new 

information collection requirements 

associated with this proposed rule. The 

records that are contributed to the Debt 

Collection Enforcement system would 

be created in any event by law 

enforcement entities and their sharing of 

this information electronically will not 

increase the paperwork burden on the 

public. 

Unfunded Mandates 

Title II of the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public 

Law 104–4, 109 Stat. 48, requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

certain regulatory actions on State, 

local, and tribal governments, and the 

private sector. UMRA requires a written 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS