alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 8275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3372]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO200-LLCOF00000-L16520000-XX0000]

Notice of Meeting, Rio Grande Natural Area Commission

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976 (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 
the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 
Rio Grande Natural Area Commission will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. on March 14, 
2012.

ADDRESSES: Hampton Inn Alamosa, 710 Mariposa Street, Alamosa, CO 81101.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Adamic, Public Affairs 
Specialist, BLM Front Range District Office, 3028 East Main, Canon 
City, CO 81212. Phone: (719) 269-8553. Email: [email protected]. Persons 
who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the 
Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact 
the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is 
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question 
with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal 
business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Rio Grande Natural Area Commission was 
established in the Rio Grande Natural Area Act (16 U.S.C. 460rrr-2). 
The nine-member Commission advises the Secretary of the Interior, 
through the BLM, concerning the preparation and implementation of a 
management plan relating to non-Federal land in the Rio Grande Natural 
Area, as directed by law. Planned agenda topics include: discussing 
resource concerns and goals that should be addressed in the management 
plan, and how the area's boundaries should be defined. In addition, the 
BLM will give a presentation on Cadastral Survey and present the State 
Director's Volunteer of the Year Award. This meeting is open to the 
public. The public may offer oral comments at 2:15 p.m. or written 
statements may be submitted for the Commission's consideration. Please 
send written comments to Denise Adamic at the address above by March 
12, 2012. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and 
time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. 
Summary minutes for the Commission Meeting will be maintained in the 
San Luis Valley Field Office and will be available for public 
inspection and reproduction during regular business hours within 30 
days following the meeting. Meeting minutes and agenda are also 
available at: http://www.blm.gov/co/st/en/fo/slvfo.html.

    Dated: February 7, 2012.
Helen M. Hankins,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-3372 Filed 2-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
```
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald L. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 85CA0141.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.

May 12, 1988.

Rehearing Denied June 2, 1988.

Certiorari Denied Sept. 6, 1988.

*262Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., Patricia Hummons Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

David F. Vela, Colorado State Public Defender, Frances Smylie Brown, Jaydee K. Bachman, Deputy State Public Defenders, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

VAN CISE, Judge.

Defendant, Donald L. Brown, appeals a judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict of guilty of sexual assault on a child by one in a position of trust in violation of § 18-3-405(1) and (2)(b), C.R.S. (1986 Repl. Vol. 8B). On April 20, 1987, in *People v. Brown,*749 P.2d 436*(Brown I),*we reversed defendant’s conviction. Thereafter, the supreme court vacated this court’s judgment and remanded the case to us for reconsideration in light of *People v. Wood,*743 P.2d 422, decided by it on October 5, 1987. On reconsideration, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

I.

In parts I and II of *Brown I,*we agreed with defendant’s contentions that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting into evidence hearsay statements of the child without complying with the safeguards provided in § 13 — 25—129, C.R.S., as then in effect. Part I pertained to the lack of notice of intention to offer the statements or to furnish the particulars of the statements. In part II we held that, because of those deficiencies, the hearing as to the reliability of the statements was inadequate.

We now conclude that parts I and II of *Brown I*were overruled by *People v. Wood, supra.*As in *Wood,*the People in the instant case did not comply strictly with the notice requirements. However, as stated in *Wood,*“because the defendant had adequate information from other sources, reversal is not required.” Here, the hearsay statements contemplated were contained in the police report, and the names of the stepmother and the social worker were included in the list of People’s witnesses submitted prior to trial. Thus, defendant had to have known that those two would testify at trial and, further, had to have known the gist of their testimony.

Also, under § 13-25-129, the court is required to find, in a hearing held outside the presence of the jury, that the time, content, and circumstances of the hearsay statements provide sufficient safeguards of reliability to warrant admission of the statements. Here, the trial court made detailed findings pursuant to this statute which are supported by the evidence. Thus, the ruling is not to be disturbed on appeal. *People v. Galloway,*726 P.2d 249 (Colo.App.1986).

II.

We adhere to our previous ruling in part III of *Brown I*that there was sufficient evidence presented for the jury to find that defendant was “one in a position of trust with respect to the victim.”

III.

The other claimed error is without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

BABCOCK and METZGER, JJ., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2023

NO. 03-23-00078-CV

Sarah Bailey, Appellant

v.

David Conde, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on January 12, 2023. Appellant has 

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the 

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.09 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, financial stewardship, strategic plan, Strategic engagement, Process excellence, Warfighter First, People and Culture

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2.82 MB)

Tags:673d Logistic Readiness Squadron, MATERIEL MANAGEMENT, 673d LRS, 673d Logistics Readiness Group, JBER

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Second Amendment of Officer Employment Agreement - Steven C. McCracken



 Exhibit 10.56 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO 

OFFICER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Second Amendment to Officer Employment Agreement (“Second Amendment”) is entered into effective April 30, 2010, by
and between Callaway Golf Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Steven C. McCracken (“Employee”). 

A. The Company and Employee are parties to that certain Officer Employment Agreement entered into as of May 1, 2008, as amended
effective January 26, 2009 (collectively the “Agreement”). 
 B. The Company and Employee desire to amend the
Agreement pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other
consideration, the value and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the Company and Employee agree as follows: 
 1.
Term. Section 1 of the Agreement is amended to extend the termination date of the Agreement to and including April 30, 2011. 

2. Compensation. Section 4(a) of the Agreement is amended to read: 

“Base Salary. The Company agrees to pay Employee a base salary at the rate of $550,000.00 per year (prorated for any partial
years of employment), payable in equal installments on regularly scheduled Company pay dates.” 
 3. Expenses and
Benefits. 
 Paid Time Off and Retirement. Employee acknowledges that, effective January 1, 2010, the
Company’s Paid Time Off Program described in Section 5(b) has been reinstated and that the Company’s 401(k) retirement investment plan described in Section 5(d) has been amended to reinstate the Company match of 401(k)
contributions for all eligible employees, including officers. Employee acknowledges that the temporary changes to the above-referenced policies, in effect in 2009, did not constitute a breach of the terms and conditions of the Agreement. 

Insurance/Death Benefit. Section 5(c) of the Agreement is amended to add a new sub-section (iv), as follows: 

“(iv) In the event of Employee’s death, all outstanding unvested service-based full value long-term incentive awards (e.g.,
restricted stock units and phantom stock units) held by Employee shall immediately vest.” 
 4. But for the amendments
contained herein, and any other written amendments properly executed by the parties, the Agreement shall otherwise remain unchanged. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment on the dates set forth below, to be effective as of the date first
set forth above. 
  

							
	EMPLOYEE	 		 	COMPANY
			
		 		 	Callaway Golf Company, a Delaware corporation
				
	 /s/ Steven C. McCracken
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ George Fellows

	Steven C. McCracken	 		 		 	George Fellows
		 		 		 	President and Chief Executive Officer
				
	Dated: April 19, 2010	 		 		 	Dated: April 19, 2010
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 277 

Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival of Diwali. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2013 

Mr. WARNER (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Mr. COONS) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the 

festival of Diwali. 

Whereas Diwali is a festival of great significance and celebrated annually by Hindus, Sikhs, and Jains throughout 

India, the United States, and the world; 

Whereas Diwali is a festival of lights that marks the beginning of the Hindu new year, during which celebrants 

light and place small lamps around the home and pray 

for health, knowledge, peace, wealth, and prosperity in 

the new year; 

Whereas Diwali will be celebrated throughout the world for 

five days and is an opportunity to celebrate the faith of 

all people and the universal right to religious expression 

and spiritual freedom; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•SRES 277 IS 

Whereas the lights symbolize the light of knowledge within 

the individual that overwhelms the darkness of ignorance, 

empowering each celebrant to do good deeds and show 

compassion to others; 

Whereas Diwali falls on the last day of the last month in the 

lunar calendar and is celebrated as a day of thanksgiving 

for the homecoming of the Lord Rama and worship of 

Lord Ganesha, the remover of obstacles and bestower of 

blessings, at the beginning of the new year for many Hindus; 

Whereas, for Sikhs, Diwali is celebrated as Bandhi Chhor 

Diwas (The Celebration of Freedom), in honor of the release from imprisonment of the sixth guru, Guru 

Hargobind; and 

Whereas, for Jains, Diwali marks the anniversary of the attainment of moksha, or liberation, by Mahavira, the last 

of the Tirthankaras (the great teachers of Jain dharma), 

at the end of his life in 527 B.C.: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the religious and historical sig3 nificance of the festival of Diwali, the festival of 

4 lights, and expresses its respect for the people of 

5 India, Indian Americans, and members of the Indian 

6 diaspora around the world on this significant occa7 sion; and 

8 (2) supports a strong relationship between the 

9 people and governments of the United States and 

10 India, based on mutual trust and respect that will 

11 enable the countries to more closely collaborate 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•SRES 277 IS 

1 across a broad spectrum of interests, such as global 

2 peace and prosperity. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 248/2006

of 13 February 2006         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 February 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 February 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 13 February 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
### -IMISPOBTATIO H SERVED : OCTOBE R12,201 0 VjKt T OPEBATlON

b 7111 0 OC T i 3 P ^2'

- 0 5 U.S
. DEPARTMEN

T O F TRANSPORTATIO

N OFFIC E O F HEARINGS WASHINGTON , DC I N TH E MATTE RO F HARRISO

N YACH T SALES , INC
. FA A DOCKE

T NO
. CP10EA000 6 (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) FDM S NO
. FAA-2010-062 6

NOTIC E O F PREHEARIN G CONFERENC E A Prehearing Telephone Conferenc e i s scheduledon Novembe r 1 , 2010 , a

t 1:30 p.m. . Easter n Time
. Al l partie s shoul db e prepare dt o discus s al l issue s an

dfacts a t issue
. All document s tha

t have bee n exchangedandtha

t hav e no t alread y bee n provide dto th e Judg e shoul db e furnishe d t o himby Octobe

r 22 , 2010
. Pursuan t to Sectio n 55 6 o f

th e Administrativ e Procedur e Act , 5 U.S.C
. § 556(c)(8) , eac h part y shall b e represente db y someone wh o ha s authorit

y to negotiat

e concernin g resolutio n of

all issue s in controversy . S O ORDERED
.
Ronni e A
. Yo c Chief Administrativ e ff ^ Judg e Attachmen t - Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP10EA000 6 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Davi dHarrison , Presiden t Harriso n Yach t

Sales , Inc. , Responden t 10 6 Well s Cov e Roa d P.O
. Bo x 9 8 Grasonville,M D 2163 8 TEL : 410-827-780 0 FAX : 410-827-483 0 Mar y Madelin e McCarthy , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , EAL- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n Easterf t Regio n 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-326 7 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A
. Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e Law Judg e U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE l 2-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Washington , D C ^059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite d courier , us e th e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000, Washington , D C 20591 , Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
-2 -
#### In the Matter of Carla Cohen, Appellant, v William Cohen, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner mother appeals, by permission, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Feiden, J.), entered January 3, 1991, as denied that branch of her cross motion which was for the recusal of the Family Court Judge.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, that branch of the cross motion which was for the recusal of the Family Court Judge is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings before a different Judge.

In this custody proceeding, the mother moved, *inter alia,*for recusal of the Judge, alleging that certain of his remarks indicated that he was not impartial. The Judge thereafter commented on the pending matter to a newspaper reporter before rendering a determination denying the mother’s motion. On appeal, the respondent father does not oppose the mother’s request for recusal of the Judge. We find that such relief is warranted under the circumstances *(see,*22 NYCRR 100.3 [a] [6]; [c] [1] [i]) and remit the matter to the Family Court for further proceedings before a different Judge.

We decline to consider the father’s request that the matter be transferred to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, where *523the parties’ matrimonial action is pending, as no motion for a transfer has been made by either party. Finally, since the father did not file a notice of cross appeal, we have not considered his contention that the Family Court erred in denying his request for sanctions against the mother. Thompson, J. P., Fiber, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.