alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Prepared for: Federal Aviation Administration/FAA Aircraft Registration Branch, AFS-750 Prepared by: Jerry Bruce /Caesars Entertainment Services PO Box 60332, Boulder City, NV. 89006 March 11, 2015
Contents Petition for Exemption Letter FAA UAS Civil COA Request Location of proposed operation with VFR Chart FAA N number Registration N6789X Proof of Ownership THE CASCATA GOLF COURSE

# EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Objective Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, ligula suspendisse nulla pretium, rhoncus tempor fermentum, enim integer ad vestibulum volutpat. Nisl rhoncus turpis est, vel elit, congue wisi enim nunc ultricies sit, magna tincidunt. Maecenas aliquam maecenas ligula nostra, accumsan taciti. 

### Goals Sociis mauris in integer, a dolor netus non dui aliquet, sagittis felis sodales, dolor sociis mauris, vel eu libero cras. Faucibus at. Arcu habitasse elementum est, ipsum purus pede porttitor class, ut adipiscing, aliquet sed auctor, imperdiet arcu per diam dapibus libero duis. Enim eros in vel, volutpat nec pellentesque leo, temporibus nec. 

### Solution Ac dolor ac adipiscing amet bibendum nullam, lacus molestie ut libero nec, diam et, pharetra sodales, feugiat ullamcorper id tempor id vitae. Mauris pretium aliquet, lectus tincidunt. 

### Project Outline Porttitor mollis imperdiet libero senectus pulvinar. Etiam molestie mauris ligula laoreet, vehicula eleifend. Repellat orci erat et, sem cum, ultricies sollicitudin amet eleifend dolor nullam erat, malesuada est leo ac.

• Varius natoque turpis elementum est. Duis montes, tellus lobortis lacus amet arcu et. In vitae vel.

• Wisi at id praesent bibendum libero faucibus porta egestas, quisque praesent ipsum fermentum tempor. Curabitur auctor, erat mollis sed.

• Turpis vivamus a dictumst congue magnis. Aliquam amet ullamcorper dignissim molestie, mollis. Tortor vitae tortor eros wisi facilisis. 

### COMPANY NAME

# BUDGET

Ut vehicula nunc mattis pede Curabitur labore. Ac augue donec, sed a dolor luctus, congue arcu id diam praesent, pretium ac, ullamcorper non hac in quisque hac. Magna amet libero maecenas justo.

Description Quantity Unit Price Cost Item 1 55 $ 100 $ 5,500 Item 2 13 $ 90 $ 1,170 Item 3 25 $ 50 $ 1,250

Total $ 7,920 

### COMPANY NAME
•1EB'r OFSh^ll^iaeS^feMTfeTiRTTTFTRIMINALAPPEALS OFTEXAS -/(S 1 P.O.BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXASJ^JU \Z\ 

### OFFICIAL BUSINESS k^^k.hj <f* \ STATE OF TEXAS^ ,§fi PENALTYFOR t v '"-

1/21/2015 SMITH, KENNETH EARL 

### is?5
Tr.-Gt Ncf. 1246787-A The Court has dismissed your applicatipn*for writ of habeas corpus without written 

### order; the sentence has been discharge'd^Sel? ExparteHarrington, 310 S.W.3d 452 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). ^ ""

KENNETH EARL SMITH L> 0 2 1M 0004279596 JAN22 2015 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 78701 WR-82,611-01

Abel Acosta, Clerk
Second Amendment to
                      Certificate of Limited Partnership of
                 Geodyne Institutional/Pension Energy Income
                             Limited Partnership P-5


     The  undersigned,  desiring to amend its amended  certificate  of limited
partnership  pursuant to the Oklahoma Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act,
as amended,  Okla.  Stat. tit. 54 (1993),  Section 301 et seq (the "Act"),  do
hereby state:

     1.   The    name    of    the    limited     partnership    is    Geodyne
Institutional/Pension Energy Income Limited Partnership P-5.

     2. The date of filing of the original  Certificate  of Limited  Partnership
was November  13, 1989,  as amended by the First  Amendment  to  Certificate  of
Limited  Partnership  of Geodyne  Institutional/Pension  Energy  Income  Limited
Partnership P-5 filed on February 25, 1993.

     3.   The Amended  Certificate of Limited Partnership is hereby revised to
change the name of the  General  Partner  and  Registered  Agent from  Geodyne
Properties, Inc. to the following:

              Geodyne Resources, Inc.

Geodyne  Properties,  Inc. merged with Geodyne  Resources,  Inc., with Geodyne
Resources, Inc. surviving, effective June 30, 1996.

     DATED:  July 1, 1996

                                       Geodyne Properties, Inc.
                                       by Geodyne Resources, Inc.,
                                       successor by merger

                                       By:  /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Dennis R. Neill
                                            President

                                       Geodyne Resources, Inc.
                                       as General Partner


                                       By:  /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Dennis R. Neill
                                            President

                                      -1-
<PAGE>



                                       Geodyne Institutional Depositary
                                       Company, as the Limited Partner


                                       By:  /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Dennis R. Neill
                                            President

                                       Geodyne Resources, Inc., as
                                       Attorney-in-Fact for all Substituted
                                       Limited Partners


                                       By:  /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Dennis R. Neill
                                            President

                                      -2-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5601-N-08]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Juanita Perry, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                    *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: February 16, 2012.

 Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 2012-4155 Filed 2-23-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 293 

Designating the week beginning on November 18, 2013, as ‘‘National Tribal 

Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2013 

Ms. HEITKAMP (for herself, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. UDALL of New 

Mexico, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. SCHATZ, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. TESTER, Mr. 

FRANKEN, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. MORAN, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, Mr. 

THUNE, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. BARRASSO, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. BAUCUS, and Mr. HEINRICH) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week beginning on November 18, 2013, as 

‘‘National Tribal Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

Whereas there are 37 tribal colleges and universities operating on more than 75 campuses in 15 States; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities are tribally or Federally chartered institutions of higher education and therefore have a unique relationship with the Federal Government; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities serve students from 

more than 250 Federally recognized Indian tribes; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities offer students access 

to knowledge and skills grounded in cultural traditions 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 293 ATS 

and values, including indigenous languages, which enhance Indian communities and enrich the United States 

as a whole; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities provide access to 

quality higher education opportunities for American Indians, Alaska Natives, and other individuals living in some 

of the most isolated and economically depressed areas in 

the United States; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities are accredited institutions of higher education that effectively prepare students 

to succeed in a global and highly competitive workforce; 

Whereas open enrollment policies have resulted in non-Indians constituting nearly one-fifth of the students at tribal 

colleges and universities; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities are effectively providing access to quality higher education opportunities to 

residents of reservation communities and the North Slope 

of Alaska; and 

Whereas the mission and achievements of tribal colleges and 

universities deserve national recognition: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week beginning on November 

3 18, 2013, as ‘‘National Tribal Colleges and Univer4 sities Week’’; and 

5 (2) calls on the people of the United States and 

6 interested groups to observe the week with approVerDate Mar 15 2010 21:08 Nov 13, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR293.ATS SR293

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 293 ATS 

1 priate ceremonies, activities, and programs to dem2 onstrate support for tribal colleges and universities. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 45/2006

of 12 January 2006         

amending Regulation (EC) No 2805/95 fixing the export refunds in the wine sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Articles 63(3) and 64(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2805/95 is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 January 2006.

It shall apply from 16 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 January 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2165/2005 (OJ L 345, 28.12.2005, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 291, 6.12.1995, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1481/2005 (OJ L 237, 14.9.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

                     ‘ANNEX

----
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10003-10004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4047]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS:  Nuclear Regulatory Commission, [NRC-2012-
0002].

DATE:  Week of February 20, 2012.

PLACE:  Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland.

STATUS:  Public and Closed.

Additional Items To Be Considered

Week of February 20, 2012

Wednesday, February 22, 2012
8:55 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative).
a. Entergy Nuclear Generation Co. and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 
(Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station),

[[Page 10004]]

Pilgrim Watch's Petition for Review of Memorandum and Order (Denying 
Pilgrim Watch's Requests for Hearing on New Contentions Relating to 
Fukushima Accident) Sept. 8, 2011 (Sept. 23, 2011) (Tentative).
b. Crow Butte Resources, Inc. (License Renewal for the In Situ Leach 
Facility, Crawford, Nebraska), Docket No. 40-8943, Memorandum (Bringing 
Matter of Concern to Commission's Attention) (Tentative)
This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address--www.nrc.gov.

* * * * *
    *The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)--(301) 415-
1292. Contact person for more information: Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415-
1651.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy-making/schedule.html.
* * * * *
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify Bill Dosch, Chief, 
Work Life and Benefits Branch, at 301-415-6200, TDD: 301-415-2100, or 
by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e196888d8d88808ccf858e928289a18f9382cf868e97"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="52253b3e3e3b333f7c363d21313a123c20317c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>. Determinations on requests for 
reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed electronically to subscribers. If you no 
longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969), or send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2d6d3c0ded7dcd79cc5c0dbd5dac6f2dcc0d19cd5ddc4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5e3a3f2c323b303b70292c3739362a1e302c3d70393128">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 15, 2012.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4047 Filed 2-16-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Page 1

Anthony J. Pucciarella

ALARIS

PO Box 1835 Lusby, MD 20657

240.538.8444 Tony@TeamAlaris.com

21 August 2015

United States Department of Transportation
Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

West Building Ground Floor Room W12

- 140 Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition for Amendment to Exemption 12109 dated July 22, 2015

, UAV Solutions, Inc

. Regulatory Docket FAA

- 2015

- 1122

Dear Sir or Madam:

On 22 July 2015, the FAA issued Exemption 1 2109 to UAV Solutions, Inc. (UAVS) , allowing commercial operations of its Phoenix 30 UAS under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and
Reform Act of 2012. UAVS now respectfully applies for an amendment to the Exemption to

allow UAVS to operate the following additional models under the same conditions as approved in exemption 12109, Docket FAA

- 2015

- 1122:

• Phoenix 15 UAS produced by UAVS

• DJI Inspire 1

• DJI Phantom 3

• 3D Robotics IRIS+

The Phoenix 15 UAS is a smaller, simplified version of the Phoenix 30. It shares the same flight control system and procedures (Normal, Emergency, and Maintenance procedures) as the larger Phoenix 30. A copy of the Operations and Maintenance Manual will b e provided as proprietary information.

The DJI Inspire 1, DJI Phantom 3, and 3D Robotics IRIS+ have been approved under previous exemptions and weigh less than the Phoenix 30

. See the following previously approved exemptions for these systems:

• DJI Inspire 1 ( Exemption No. 11394 , Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 0160 )

• DJI Phantom 3 ( Exemption No. 11991

, Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 1492)

• 3D Robotics IRIS+ ( Exemption No. 12084 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 0385 )Page 2

The addition of the systems requested does not affect the basis upon which the FAA granted its approval in Exemption 1 2109. To the extent necessary, UAVS refers the FAA to its original exemption request submitted in Docket FAA

- 2015

- 1122 for a listing of regulations (as amended by Exemption 1 2109 ) for which a waiver is being sought; a demonstration of the public interest; and a showing of an equivalent level of safety.

Because the se additional systems are very similar in size and performance to the Phoenix 30 as approved for commercial operation s in Exemption 1 2109 , and the conditions under which it will operate remain the same, UAVS respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

Please contact me at y our earliest convenience if there are any questions.

Sincerely,

Anthony J. Pucciarella

ALARIS Agent for UAV Solutions, Inc.

Cc: William Davidson
cERlFINALREPORTJune,2010ChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,KurumeSponsorTitleStudynumberSTATEMENTChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,KunnneSponsorTitleStudynumberSTATEMENTChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,KurumeSponsorTitleStudynumberQUALITYASSURANCESTATEMENT-ChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,Kurume-1--2--3--4--5--6--7--8--9--10--11--12--13--14-Appendix1-lAppcndixl-Appendix2-1Appendix2--2Appendix2--3Appendix2-Appendix3-1Appendix3--2Appendix3--3Appendix3--4Appcndix3--5Appendix3-AdditionaldataResultsofpreliminarystudies-lAdditionaldata--2Additionaldata-
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00090-CR

Jerrid Damond Brunt, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 65829, THE HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, Jerrid Damond Brunt, pled guilty and judicially confessed to the offense

of felony driving while intoxicated, a third-degree felony. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 49.04(a),

1

49.09(b)(2) (West 2011). He entered his plea open to the court without benefit of a plea bargain

agreement as to punishment. After reviewing the pre-sentence investigation report, the trial court

found Brunt guilty and assessed his punishment at confinement for ten years in the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.34 (West 2011).

Brunt’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief

concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the

record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio,

We note that Brunt simultaneously pled guilty to aggravated assault with a deadlyweapon, 1

a first-degree felony as indicted, arising out of the same incident. Brunt is not appealing that case.
488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State,

516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972);

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

Brunt received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to examine the

appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. No pro se brief or other

written response has been filed.

We have reviewed the record, including appellate counsel’s brief, and find no

reversible error. See Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Bledsoe v. State,

178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the appeal is

frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin

Affirmed

Filed: November 8, 2011

Do Not Publish

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DIAJHMERE DORTCH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 32 WM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2022, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Petitioner’s counsel is directed to 

file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 15 days.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Section 1350 Certifications



I am the Principal Financial Officer
of Ameritek Ventures, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended August 31, 2018 and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form
10-Q”).



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Ameritek Ventures (the “Company”)
certifies to his knowledge that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2018 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | The information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                                 



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth P. Mayeaux     
|Kenneth P. Mayeaux         
|Principal Financial Officer
|                           
|Date:  October 22, 2018