alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 12-40305 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. FRANCISCO PENA-ROSALES, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:11-CR-1143-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Franc i sco Pena-Rosales (Pena) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pena has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Pena’s response. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review

. Ac c o r d ingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Februa ry 6, 201 3 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 12-40305 Document: 00512136435 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/06/2013No. 12-40305

G RANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, a n d t h e APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-40305 Document: 00512136435 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/06/2013
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th day of August, 2012.








Dated:  August 14, 2012








/s/ Timothy J. Neher


Timothy J. Neher


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XIX, INC. and will be retained by ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XIX, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the quarterly Report of
Praetorian Property, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Llorn Kylo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Munjit Johal,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations
of the Company for the periods presented.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By:    | /s/ Llorn Kylo                          
|------ | ----------------------------------------
|Name:  | Llorn Kylo                              
|Title: | Principal Executive Officer and Director
|Date:  | January 12, 2016                        
|       |                                         
|By:    | /s/ Munjit Johal                        
|Name:  | Munjit Johal                            
|Title: | Principal Financial Officer             
|Date:  | January 12, 2016                        



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 5, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134693 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan _________________________________________ Robert P. Young, Jr. 

IN RE MARY KIANA JAMES and KAYLA 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

JOYCE JAMES, Minors. 

_________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 134693 

 COA: 274866

 Oakland CC

OTHA LEE JAMES, JR., 

Respondent-Appellant. 

 Family Division: 05-713874-NA 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 24, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1002 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 5, 2007 

Clerk
Summary of 2010 Amendments


 Exhibit 10.1 

Summary of 2010 Amendments to the 

Energy Partners, Ltd. Change of Control Severance Plan 

Amend the Change of Control Severance Plan effective as of March 24, 2005, as amended from time to time prior to the date hereof,
for designated officers and employees of the Company (the “COC Plan”) to provide for the following: 

(i) Provide that a Participant (as defined in the COC Plan) receives benefits under the COC Plan only if such
Participant’s termination of employment occurs within one year after a Change of Control (as defined in the COC Plan); 

(ii) Provide for levels of Designated Multiple (as defined in the COC Plan) of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5; 

(iii) Provide for levels of Designated Period (as defined in the COC Plan) of: 

 

	 	(A)	12 months for Participants with a Designated Multiple of 1.0; and 

  

	 	(B)	18 months for Participants with a Designated Multiple of 1.5, 2.0 or 2.5; 


(iv) Change the method of determining a Participant’s bonus for purposes of calculating the severance benefit payable
as follows: 
  

	 	(A)	for a termination of employment occurring during 2010, 50% of the target bonus for 2010; 


 

	 	(B)	for a termination of employment occurring during 2011, the average of (1) 50% of the target bonus for 2011, (2) 50% of the target bonus for 2011 and
(3) the actual bonus paid or to be paid for 2010; 

  

	 	(C)	for a termination of employment occurring during 2012, the average of (1) 50% of the target bonus for 2012, (2) the actual bonus paid for 2010 and
(3) the actual bonus paid or to be paid for 2011; 

  

	 	(D)	for a termination of employment occurring after 2012, the average annual bonus for the three years preceding termination; and 








	 	(E)	for a termination of employment of a Participant hired after the adoption of this proposed amendment of the COC Plan, the Board and/or the Compensation Committee can
determine to adjust the bonus calculation if, under the circumstances of such Participant’s employment, the Board and/or Compensation Committee determines such adjustment is necessary or appropriate to accomplishing the objectives of the COC
Plan; and 

 (v) For a period of 18 months after the adoption of this proposed amendment of the COC
Plan, no amendment or termination of the COC Plan is permitted that would remove a Participant from the COC Plan or would adversely affect a Participant’s rights to benefits under the COC Plan, other than to define an exchange offer, bankruptcy
or similar technical circumstance as not constituting, in the determination of the Board, a Change of Control, in terms of fulfilling the objectives of the COC Plan. 

 

 - 2 -
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 24

- 00185

- CR

J ESUS R AMIREZROSALES

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 396th District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 1798140 )

August 1, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                           1,442,263
<SECURITIES>                     519,141 <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                    48,519
<ALLOWANCES>                     0
<INVENTORY>                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 0
<PP&E>                           18,308,792 <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                   2,254,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   18,137,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            377,785 
<BONDS>                          (569) <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      0
<COMMON>                         17,760,409 <F4>
<OTHER-SE>                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     18,137,625
<SALES>                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 2,327,929 <F5>
<CGS>                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    921,133 <F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 (12,980) <F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              0
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     1,421,119
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0
<FN>
<F1>   "SECURITIES" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES
<F2>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F3>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MINORITY INTEREST IN JOINT VENTURE
<F4>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F5>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F6>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES
<F7>   "OTHER EXPENSES" REPRESENTS MINORITY INTEREST AND JOINT 
VENTURES' NET INCOME/LOSS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.41 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, DSCR, Defense Supply Center Richmond, DLA Installation Operations Richmond, people and culture, Safety Stand Down

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 24 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.24
                                      Agreed to October 16, 2013        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Wednesday, 
October 16, 2013, through Friday, October 25, 2013, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on Monday, 
October 28, 2013, or such other time on that day as may be specified by 
its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, 
or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House 
adjourns on any legislative day from Wednesday, October 16, 2013, 
through Monday, October 21, 2013, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
current resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 22, 2013, or until the 
time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, or their respective designees, acting jointly after consultation 
with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority Leader of the 
House, shall notify the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, 
to reassemble at such place and time as they may designate if, in their 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 160 DB 2020 (No. 100 RST 2020)

:

THOMAS G. SCULLY : Attorney Registration No. 43231

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM INACTIVE STATUS : ( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24 th day of December

, 2020 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated December 16

, 2020

, is approved and it is ORDERED

that Thomas G. Scully

, who has been on Inactive Status

, h as demonstrated that he has

the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to

practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner

.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS






The Board of Directors and Shareholders
The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.:



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-24913) on Form S-8 of The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. of our reports dated
October 22, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of The Santa Cruz
Operation, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1997 and 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1997,
and the related schedule, which reports appear or are incorporated by reference
in the September 30, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of The Santa Cruz
Operation, Inc.




                                    /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                    --------------------------------


San Jose, California
December 18, 1997
* Pursuant to 5th CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in 5th CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20848

Summary Calendar

EDWARD WILLIAM COLBERT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

HARRIS COUNTY, ET AL.; JERRY WAYNE COHN, Deputy Sheriff; ROBERT

KAMINSKY, Dr.; STATE OF TEXAS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-95-CV-31

March 3, 1999

Before JOHNSON, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this civil rights action, Edward William Colbert appeals from

the district court’s grant of summary judgment and award of attorney’s

fees to defendant Kaminsky and from the district court’s denial of his

motion for judgment as a matter of law or for new trial after the jury’s

verdict for defendant Cohn. Colbert argues that the district court

erred (1) by determining that he did not have standing to challenge the

constitutionality of Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 38.15, (2) in granting

summary judgment in favor of defendant Kaminsky, and (3) by granting
2

attorney’s fees to Kaminsky pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Further,

Colbert argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s

finding that defendant Cohn was entitled to qualified immunity based

upon extraordinary circumstances. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for

essentially the same reasons stated by the district court. See Colbert

v. Harris County, Texas, No. H-95-0031 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 11, 1997)

(Memorandum and Order); Colbert v. Harris County, Texas, No. H-95-0031

(S.D. Tex. Sept. 11, 1997) (Memorandum and Opinion); Colbert v. Harris

County, Texas, No. H-95-0031 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 1997); Colbert v.

Harris County, Texas, No. H-95-0031 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 1996).

AFFIRMED.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000103506-MAY-201310:28 AM
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 9697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-923-1310-FI; WYW151749]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
WYW151749, Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as 
amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for 
reinstatement from Redwine Resources, Inc. for competitive oil and gas 
lease WYW151749 for land in Carbon County, Wyoming. The petition was 
filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date 
the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. 
Weaver, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at 307-775-6176. Persons 
who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the 
Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact 
the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is 
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question 
with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal 
business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $159 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessee has 
met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in 
Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the BLM is proposing to reinstate lease WYW151749 
effective December 1, 2010, under the original terms and conditions of 
the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. The 
BLM has not issued a valid lease to any other interest affecting the 
lands.

Julie L. Weaver,
Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 2012-3764 Filed 2-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
Docket Number FAA-2014-0003

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?
EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID



### 1356 Ghent 4

1 4/14/2010 13:33 4/14/2010 2 4/14/2010 15:40 4/14/2010 3 4/14/2010 17:15 4/14/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used



### 14:46 [<0.102] Dry Method 26A 

### 16:57 0.243 Dry Method 26A 

### 18:31 0.195 Dry Method 26A Method 26A Method 26A Method 26A Test End Time Chlorine Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments 

### BDL [<0.000339] 3851.118 4514.3 

### 13.2 ADL 0.000815 3864.084 4549 

### 14.7 ADL 0.000647 3868.843 4556.4 

### 14.9 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method 

### 9.8 9.6 

### 1442542 127 431117 

### bituminous lb/hour 

### Other 9.9 9.2 1421210 128 438643 

### bituminous lb/hour 

### Other 9.7 9.1 1435382 127 437178 

### bituminous lb/hour 

### Other Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method 

### Fuel Input Rate is derived from coal feeder readings. Detection Limit Calculation descriptions were attached to the submitted ERT file (1356_Unit_4_ERT.mdb).

Fuel Input Rate is derived from coal feeder readings Fuel Input Rate is derived from coal feeder readings Other Supporting Information Fuel #4

### Fuel Input Rate is derived from coal feeder readings. Detection Limit Calculation descriptions were attached to the submitted ERT file (1356_Unit_4_ERT.mdb). Fuel Input Rate is derived from coal feeder readings Fuel Input Rate is derived from coal feeder readings

### Fuel Input Rate is derived from coal feeder readings. Detection Limit Calculation descriptions were attached to the submitted ERT file (1356_Unit_4_ERT.mdb).