alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10(b)


 


CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


 


We hereby consent to the
use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-146508)
of our report dated April 20, 2010, relating to the statutory financial
statements of Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company, which appears in
such Registration Statement.  We also
consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-146508)
of our report dated April 23, 2010, relating to the financial statements of
Variable Annuity Account A of Protective Life, which appears in such
Registration Statement.  We also consent
to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Registration
Statement.


 


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers



 


PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP


Birmingham, Alabama


April 29, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4416

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SOFIA KRAIT WINKLER, a/k/a Sofia Krait,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (2:06-cr-00107-RAJ)

Submitted: October 10, 2007 Decided: January 17, 2008

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James S. Ellenson, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck

Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Joseph E. DePadilla, Assistant

United States Attorney, Matthew P. Kertz, Third Year Law Student,

Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Sofia Krait Winkler was found guilty by a jury of Count

1, conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2000), and Counts

3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, false statements related to naturalization or

citizenship, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1015(a) (West Supp.

2007). She was sentenced to twenty-five months of imprisonment.

On appeal, Winkler argues that the district court erred in denying

her request for a jury instruction on entrapment. For the reasons

that follow, we affirm. 

We find no reversible error in the district court’s

refusal to issue the instruction. United States v. Phan, 121 F.3d

149, 154 (4th Cir. 1997) (stating review standard). The record

does not support Winkler’s claim that she was induced to commit her

crimes and that she had no previous predisposition to do so. See

Mathews v. United States, 485 U.S. 58, 63 (1998); United States v.

Sarihifard, 155 F.3d 301, 308 (4th Cir. 1998). In particular,

Winkler failed in her evidentiary burden to establish grounds for

the affirmative defense, United States v. Lewis, 53 F.3d 29, 33 n.8

(4th Cir. 1995), and the evidence of her predisposition to commit

the crimes was abundant. United States v. Sligh, 142 F.3d 761,

762-63 (4th Cir. 1998).

Accordingly, we affirm her convictions. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
- 3 -

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

 AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 23.1





Consent of Registered Independent Public Accounting Firm





Fortune Industries, Inc.


Indianapolis, Indiana





We consent the use of our audit report dated September 28, 2010, except for Note 23, as to which the date is May 13, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Fortune Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the fiscal periods ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and August 31, 2008.





/s/ SOMERSET CPAs, P.C.Indianapolis, IndianaSeptember 28, 2010, except for Note 23, as to which the date is May 13, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Susquehanna River Basin Commission

# AGENCY:

Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Susquehanna River Basin Commission published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of January 23, 2012, concerning a public hearing to be held on February 16, 2012, in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The document contained an incorrect location for one of the projects listed in the Supplementary Information section of such notice.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Richard A. Cairo, General Counsel, telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 306; fax: (717) 238-2436; email:                         *rcairo@srbc.net*                         or Stephanie L. Richardson, Secretary to the Commission, telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 304; fax: (717) 238-2436; email:                         *srichardson@srbc.net*. Information concerning the applications for these projects is available at the SRBC Water Resource Portal at                         *www.srbc.net/​wrp*. Materials and supporting documents are available to inspect and copy in accordance with the Commission's Access to Records Policy at                         *www.srbc.net/​pubinfo/​docs/​2009-02%20Access%20to%20Records%20Policy%209-10-09.PDF*.                    

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of January 23, 2012, in FR Doc. 77-14, on page 3323, in the second column, correct project no. 34 to read:                    

34. Project Sponsor and Facility: Water Treatment Solutions, LLC (South Mountain Lake), Woodward Township, Lycoming County, Pa. Application for surface water withdrawal of up to 0.499 mgd (peak day).

Authority:  Pub. L. 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq., 18 CFR parts 806-808.

Dated: February 14, 2012.

Thomas W. Beauduy,

Deputy Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2012-3890 Filed 2-17-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7040-01-P
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 419 

Recognizing the celebration of National Student Employment Week 2014 

at the University of Minnesota Duluth. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 8, 2014 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. FRANKEN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the celebration of National Student Employment 

Week 2014 at the University of Minnesota Duluth. 

Whereas National Student Employment Week offers the University of Minnesota Duluth the opportunity to recognize 

students who work while attending college; 

Whereas the University of Minnesota Duluth is committed to 

increasing awareness of student employment as an educational experience for students and as an alternative to 

financial aid; 

Whereas there are nearly 1,500 student employees at the 

University of Minnesota Duluth; 

Whereas the University of Minnesota Duluth recognizes the 

importance of student employees to their employers; and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 419 IS 

Whereas National Student Employment Week is celebrated 

the week of April 14 through 18, 2014: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the celebration 

2 of National Student Employment Week at the University 

3 of Minnesota Duluth. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chief Executive Officer, in connection with the Quarterly Report of CĪON Investment Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                                            
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 9, 2019





/s/ Michael A. Reisner


Michael A. Reisner


Co-Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


CĪON Investment Corporation
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000825

14-AUG-2015

08:25 AM
#### Ricardo ROYBAL, Petitioner, v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Respondent.

No. 89SC345.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Oct. 23, 1989.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0621

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

WAYNE ROBERT ARMSTRONG,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 21, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2024

09/13/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0621
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.7 MB)

Tags:logistical, coordinate, transportation, channel, complex, demand, coordination, professional, organization, concept, concept, inbound, real, conceptual, analysis, optimize, risk, resources, security, business, information, management, simulation, data, logistics, digital, software, time, program, chain, supply, distribution, channels, manage, outbound, inventory, optimal, resource, storage, transmit, location, warehouse, warehousing, realtime, tracker

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER11-4628-000]

                    As indicated in the February 2, 2012 Supplement Notice, Supplemental Notice For Staff Technical Conference, in the above-captioned proceeding,[1]                                          this notice establishes the due date for comments on the staff technical conference held on February 14, 2012 as 15 days from the date of the conference, or Wednesday, February 29, 2012. Reply comments are due seven days later on Wednesday, March 7, 2012.                

Dated: February 14, 2012.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             Supplement Notice,                         *Supplemental Notice For Staff Technical Conference,*                         issued February 2, 2012.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2012-4011 Filed 2-21-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 24, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 24, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20I0231. CHRISTOPHER LEE FRITH v. MELINDA DAWN HARVEY.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: SU10DM3672
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 123/2005

of 30 September 2005         

amending Annex XV (State aid) and Protocol 26 (on the powers and functions of the EFTA Surveillance Authority in the field of State aid) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Annex XV to the Agreement shall be amended as specified in Annex I to this Decision.

Article 2

Protocol 26 to the Agreement shall be amended as specified in Annex II to this Decision.

Article 3

The text of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004, as corrected by OJ L 25, 28. 1.2005, p. 74 and OJ L 131, 25.5.2005, p. 45, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 October 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 5

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

HSH Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN            

----

(1)OJ L 64, 10.3.2005, p. 67.

(2)OJ L 130, 29.4.2004, p. 3.

(3)OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----

ANNEX I

Annex XV to the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

The text of points 2 (C/252/80/p. 2: The notification of State aids to the Commission pursuant to Article 93 (3) of the EEC Treaty), 3 (Letter from the Commission to the Member States SG(81) 12740 of 2 October 1981), 4 (Letter from the Commission to the Member States SG(89) D/5521 of 27 April 1989), 5 (Letter from the Commission to the Member States SG(87) D/5540 of 30 April 1989), 6 (Letter from the Commission to the Member States SG(90) D/28091 of 11 October 1990), 7 (Letter from the Commission to the Member States SG(91) D/4577 of 4 March 1991), 8 (C/40/90/p. 2: Notification of an aid scheme of minor importance), 10 (C/318/83/p. 3: Commission Communication on aids granted illegally), 34 (C/3/85/p. 2: Commission communication on the cumulation of aids for different purposes) shall be deleted.

----

ANNEX II

Protocol 26 to the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

----
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred John FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87CA0056.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.

April 7, 1988.

Rehearing Denied May 12, 1988.

Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., Robert M. Petrusak, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

Clifford J. Barnard, Boulder, for defendant-appellant.

JONES, Judge.

Contending that, upon his conviction, the trial court erred in regarding conspiracy to commit first degree murder as a crime of *160violence, defendant, Alfred John Flores, appeals his sentencing beyond the presumptive range provided for that offense. We conclude that the trial court sentenced defendant in the aggravated range on a basis other than that urged by defendant, and therefore affirm.

At the time pertinent to this case, crime of violence was defined as:

> “[A] crime in which the defendant used, or possessed and threatened the use of, a deadly weapon during the commission of any crime committed against an elderly or handicapped person or of a crime of murder, first or second degree assault, kidnapping, sexual assault, robbery, first degree arson, first or second degree burglary, escape, or criminal extortion, or during the immediate flight therefrom, or who caused serious bodily injury or death to any person, other than himself or another participant, during the commission of any such felony or during the immediate flight therefrom.” Section 16-ll-309(2)(a)(I), C.R.S. (1978 Repl.Vol. 8).

Since the general assembly did not expressly include conspiracy among those offenses defined as crimes of violence, we conclude that one convicted of conspiracy may not be sentenced pursuant to § 16-ll-309(l)(a), C.R.S. (1978 Repl.Vol. 8).

However, pursuant to § 18-l-105(9)(c) C.R.S. (1978 RepLVol. 8), the trial court was authorized to consider aggravating circumstances other than conviction for a crime of violence, or other statutory extraordinary aggravating circumstances, as the basis for sentencing defendant in the aggravated range. Here, the trial court found extraordinary aggravating circumstances in that two people were killed, that the defendant was present and did nothing to prevent the murders, that he obtained the murder weapon, that in the criminal episode he committed burglary and robbery, that he transported the co-defendant and aided in covering up the offenses, and that he removed stolen property and fled to avoid apprehension. These circumstances do provide a basis for imposition of a sentence beyond the presumptive range. *Cf. People v. Jenkins,*674 P.2d 981 (Colo.App.1983). Hence, we will not disturb the sentence imposed.

The other contentions of defendant are without merit.

The sentence is affirmed.

VAN CISE and STERNBERG, JJ., concur.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 16 ) ll-K - (B)- 4 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:48AM Sheet 16 of 325P. 2

^ H-K-(B)- 4 PEDC o BOILE R COS T DATA . Lette r fro mK.F . Held , EE At o J . Pratapas , EPA:EAB . Jun e 18 , 1979 . THI S INFORMATIO NCA

NB E FOUN D I

NDOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE M II-K-(B)- 4
#### National School Bus Service, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v Hartford Fire Insurance Company et al., Respondents, and Home Indemnity Company, Appellant.

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed with costs to plaintiff for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Fallon, J. (Appeals from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fallon, J.—Declaratory Judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7338
In Re: GERALD DAMONE HOPPER,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-95-119) Submitted: November 23, 2005 Decided: December 15, 2005 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gerald Damone Hopper, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Gerald Damone Hopper petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2005). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court granted Hopper’s motion on October 28, 2005. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Hopper’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED