9892 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Notices 

1Petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi 

Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Inc. and Toray Plastics 

(America), Inc. 

parties in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Assessment Rate 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the 

Department will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with these 

amended final results of review. For 

assessment purposes, we calculated 

importer (or customer)-specific 

assessment rates for merchandise 

subject to this review consistent with 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where appropriate, 

we calculated an ad valorem rate for 

each importer (or customer) by dividing 

the total dumping margins for reviewed 

sales to that party by the total entered 

values associated with those 

transactions. For duty-assessment rates 

calculated on this basis, we will direct 

CBP to assess the resulting ad valorem 

rate against the entered customs values 

for the subject merchandise. Where 

appropriate, we calculated a per-unit 

rate for each importer (or customer) by 

dividing the total dumping margins for 

reviewed sales to that party by the total 

sales quantity associated with those 

transactions. For duty-assessment rates 

calculated on this basis, we will direct 

CBP to assess the resulting per-unit rate 

against the entered quantity of the 

subject merchandise. Where an importer 

(or customer)-specific assessment rate is 

de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), 

the Department will instruct CBP to 

assess that importer’s (or customer’s) 

entries of subject merchandise without 

regard to antidumping duties, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

The Court of International Trade has 

issued a preliminary injunction 

enjoining the liquidation of certain 

entries during the period of review, 

therefore, assessment instructions will 

be issued as appropriate. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective 

retroactively on any entries made on or 

after December 14, 2011, the date of 

publication of the Final Results, for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided for by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

Yixing Union, the cash deposit rate will 

be the amended final margin rate shown 

above in the ‘‘Ministerial Errors’’ section 

of this notice; (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that have 

separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the exporter-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

for all PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the PRCwide rate of 156.87 percent; and (4) for 

all non-PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporters that supplied that non-PRC 

exporter. These deposit requirements 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

These amended final results are 

published in accordance with sections 

751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 10, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3971 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–825] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip from India: Preliminary Intent 

to Rescind Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 21, 

2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni 

Page, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–1398. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2011, the Department of 

Commerce (Department) published a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet 

and strip from India covering the period 

January 1, 2010, through December 31, 

2010. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 76 

FR 38609, 38610 (July 1, 2011). The 

Department received a timely request 

from Petitioners 1 for a CVD 

administrative review of five 

companies: Ester Industries Limited 

(Ester), Garware Polyester Ltd. 

(Garware), Jindal Poly Films Limited of 

India (Jindal), Polyplex Corporation Ltd. 

(Polyplex), and SRF Limited (SRF). The 

Department also received timely 

requests for a CVD review from Vacmet 

India Ltd. (Vacmet) and Polypacks 

Industries of India (Polypacks). 

On August 26, 2011, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of 

administrative review with respect to 

Ester, Garware, Jindal, Polyplex, SRF, 

Vacmet, and Polypacks. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 53404 

(August 26, 2011). Subsequently, 

Vacmet and Polypacks timely withdrew 

their requests for an administrative 

review; on September 20, 2011, the 

Department published a rescission, in 

part, of the CVD administrative review 

with respect to Vacmet and Polypacks. 

See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet and Strip From India: Rescission, 

In Part, of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review, 76 FR 58248 

(September 20, 2011). 

On September 12, 2011, SRF filed a 

certification of no shipments and 

requested that the Department rescind 

the CVD administrative review of the 

company. 

On November 25, 2011, Petitioners 

timely withdrew their request for CVD 

administrative reviews of Ester, 

Garware, Polyplex, and Jindal. The 

Department published a rescission, in 

part, of the CVD administrative review 

with respect to Ester, Garware, Polyplex, 

and Jindal on January 11, 2012. See 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip From India: Rescission, In 

Part, of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review, 77 FR 1668 

(January 11, 2012). The administrative 

review of SRF continued. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

all gauges of raw, pretreated, or primed 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet 

and strip, whether extruded or 

coextruded. Excluded are metallized 

films and other finished films that have 

had at least one of their surfaces 

modified by the application of a 

performance-enhancing resinous or 

inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 

inches thick. Imports of polyethylene 

terephthalate film, sheet and strip are 

classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Notices 9893 

2See Message number 1285302, available at 

http://addcvd.cbp.gov/index.asp. 

3See, e.g., Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe 

and Tube from Turkey: Notice of Rescission of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, In Part, 

74 FR 47921 (September 18, 2009). 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

under item number 3920.62.00.90. 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes. The 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

Intent To Rescind the 2010 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review 

SRF submitted a letter to the 

Department on September 12, 2011, 

certifying that it had no shipments of 

subject merchandise that entered the 

United States during calendar year 

2010, which is the period of review 

(POR). Petitioners did not comment on 

SRF’s claim of no shipments or entries. 

Previously, on September 1, 2011, the 

Department released the results of a U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

data query to interested parties with an 

administrative protective order for this 

segment of the administrative review, 

which showed SRF had no suspended 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR. After the receipt of SRF’s no 

shipment certification, we sent a ‘‘no 

shipments inquiry’’ message to CBP, 

which posted the message on October 

12, 2011.2 We have not received any 

responses from CBP regarding the no 

shipments inquiry indicating that there 

were any suspended entries from SRF 

during the POR. See Memorandum to 

the File through Barbara E. Tillman, 

Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, 

‘‘Claim of No Shipments from SRF 

Limited in the 2010 Administrative 

Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate 

Film, Sheet and Strip from India’’ (dated 

concurrently with this notice). 

Based on our analysis of all of the 

information on the record, we 

preliminarily determine that SRF had 

no shipments or entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR. Therefore, 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3), and consistent with our 

practice,3 we preliminarily determine to 

rescind the review for SRF. Because SRF 

is the sole remaining company in this 

administrative review, the rescission of 

the review with respect to SRF would 

result in a rescission of the 

administrative review in its entirety. 

Public Comment 

The Department is setting aside a 

period for interested parties to raise 

issues regarding the Department’s 

preliminary intent to rescind the 

administrative review for SRF. 

Interested parties should submit such 

comments within 20 calendar days of 

the publication of this notice. 

Comments must be filed electronically 

via Import Administration’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(IA ACCESS) (https:// 

iaaccess.trade.gov/). The period for 

public comment is intended to provide 

the Department with ample opportunity 

to consider all views prior to making a 

final determination concerning whether 

to rescind the administrative review. 

We are issuing this notice in 

accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: February 14, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3972 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Notice of Scope Rulings 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 21, 

2012. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) hereby publishes a list 

of scope rulings completed between 

April 1, 2011, and June 30, 2011. In 

conjunction with this list, the 

Department is also publishing a list of 

requests for scope rulings and 

anticircumvention determinations 

pending as of June 30, 2011. We intend 

to publish future lists after the close of 

the next calendar quarter. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia 

Hancock, AD/CVD Operations, China/ 

NME Group, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202– 

482–1394. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department’s regulations provide 

that the Secretary will publish in the 

Federal Register a list of scope rulings 

on a quarterly basis. See 19 CFR 

351.225(o). Our most recent notification 

of scope rulings was published on 

November 29, 2011. See Notice of Scope 

Rulings, 76 FR 73596 (November 29, 

2011). This current notice covers all 

scope rulings and anticircumvention 

determinations completed by Import 

Administration between April 1, 2011, 

and June 30, 2011, inclusive, and it also 

lists any scope or anticircumvention 

inquiries pending as of June 30, 2011. 

As described below, subsequent lists 

will follow after the close of each 

calendar quarter. 

Scope Rulings Completed Between April 

1, 2011, and June 30, 2011 

People’s Republic of China 

A–570–504: Petroleum Wax Candles 

from the People’s Republic of China. 

Requestor: R&D Chemicals, Inc.; ‘‘Bite 

Lite’’ brand candles are not within the 

scope of the antidumping duty order; 

April 18, 2011. 

A–570–601: Tapered Roller Bearings 

from the People’s Republic of China. 

Requestor: New Trend Engineering 

Limited; its wheel hub units are within 

the scope of the antidumping duty 

order; April 18, 2011. 

A–570–601: Tapered Roller Bearings 

from the People’s Republic of China. 

Requestor: Bosda International (USA) 

LLC and Kingdom Auto Parts Ltd.; its 

wheel hub units are within the scope of 

the antidumping duty order; June 14, 

2011. 

A–570–803: Heavy Forged Hand Tools 

from the People’s Republic of China. 

Requestor: Lucky Distributing, Inc.; 

Lucky Distributing, Inc.’s cast smart 

splitter is not within the scope of the 

antidumping duty order; June 6, 2011. 

A–570–868: Folding Metal Tables and 

Chairs from the People’s Republic of 

China. 

Requestor: Lifetime Products, Inc.; its 

33-inch round tables are not within the 

scope of the antidumping duty order; 

May 2, 2011. 

A–570–868: Folding Metal Tables and 

Chairs from the People’s Republic of 

China. 

Requestor: Meco Corporation; its 

pedestal tables are not within the scope 

of the antidumping duty order; May 19, 

2011. 

A–570–890: Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China. 

Requestor: Acme Furniture Industry 

Inc.; partially upholstered daybed with 

trundle unit is within the scope of the 

antidumping duty order; fully 

upholstered daybed without trundle 

unit is not within the scope of the 

antidumping duty order; April 15, 2011. 

A–570–890: Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China. 

Requestor: Ashley Furniture 

Industries Inc.; certain polyurethane 

mirrors and an upholstered mirror are 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES