alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

II Tiesību akti, kuru publicēšana nav obligāta

Komisija

----

LĒMUMS Nr. 202

(2005. gada 17. marts)

par paraugveidlapām, kas vajadzīgas, lai piemērotu Padomes Regulu (EEK) Nr. 1408/71 un Regulu (EEK) Nr. 574/72 (E 001, E 101, E 102, E 103, E 104, E 106, E 107, E 108, E 109, E 112, E 115, E 116, E 117, E 118, E 120, E 121, E 123, E 124, E 125, E 126 un E 127)

(Dokuments attiecas uz EEZ un ES/Šveices nolīgumu)

(2006/203/EK)

MIGRĒJOŠO DARBA ŅĒMĒJU SOCIĀLĀ NODROŠINĀJUMA ADMINISTRATĪVĀ KOMISIJA,

ņemot vērā 81. panta a) punktu Padomes 1971. gada 14. jūnija Regulā (EEK) Nr. 1408/71 par sociālā nodrošinājuma shēmu piemērošanu darba ņēmējiem, pašnodarbinātajām personām un viņu ģimenes locekļiem, kas pārvietojas Kopienas teritorijā (1), saskaņā ar kuru administratīvās komisijas pienākums ir nodarboties ar visiem administratīviem jautājumiem, kas rodas no Regulas (EEK) Nr. 1408/71 un tai sekojošām regulām,

ņemot vērā 2. panta 1. punktu Padomes 1972. gada 21. marta Regulā (EEK) Nr. 574/72, ar ko nosaka izpildes kārtību Regulai (EEK) Nr. 1408/71 par sociālās drošības shēmu piemērošanu nodarbinātām personām un to ģimenēm, pārvietojoties Kopienā (2), saskaņā ar kuru administratīvās komisijas pienākums ir sagatavot dokumentu paraugus, kuri ir vajadzīgi regulu piemērošanai,

ņemot vērā 1993. gada 7. oktobra Lēmumu Nr. 153 par paraugveidlapām, kas vajadzīgas, lai piemērotu Padomes Regulu (EEK) Nr. 1408/71 un Regulu (EEK) Nr. 574/72 (E 001, E 103 līdz E 127) (3),

ņemot vērā 1996. gada 27. novembra Lēmumu Nr. 164 par paraugveidlapām, kas vajadzīgas, lai piemērotu Padomes Regulu (EEK) Nr. 1408/71 un Regulu (EEK) Nr. 574/72 (E 101 un E 102) (4),

ņemot vērā 1997. gada 2. oktobra Lēmumu Nr. 166 par grozījumu izdarīšanu veidlapās E 106 un E 109 (5),

ņemot vērā 1998. gada 11. jūnija Lēmumu Nr. 168 par grozījumu izdarīšanu veidlapās E 121 un E 127 un veidlapas E 122 anulēšanu (6),

ņemot vērā 2000. gada 18. aprīļa Lēmumu Nr. 179 par paraugveidlapām, kas vajadzīgas, lai piemērotu Padomes Regulu (EEK) Nr. 1408/71 un Regulu (EEK) Nr. 574/72 (E 111, E 111 B, E 113 līdz E 118 un E 125 līdz E 127) (7),

ņemot vērā 2002. gada 27. jūnija Lēmumu Nr. 185, ar ko groza 1993. gada 7. oktobra Lēmumu Nr. 153 (veidlapu E 108) (8),

ņemot vērā 2002. gada 27. jūnija Lēmumu Nr. 186 par paraugveidlapām, kas vajadzīgas, lai piemērotu Padomes Regulu (EEK) Nr. 1408/71 un Regulu (EEK) Nr. 574/72 (E 101) (9),

tā kā:

IR NOLĒMUSI ŠĀDI:

Administratīvās komisijas priekšsēdētāja –

Claude EWEN

----

(1)OV L 149, 5.7.1971., 2. lpp. Regulā jaunākie grozījumi izdarīti ar Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 647/2005 (OV L 17, 4.5.2005., 1. lpp.).

(2)OV L 74, 27.3.1972., 1. lpp. Regulā jaunākie grozījumi izdarīti ar Regulu (EK) Nr. 647/2005.

(3)OV L 244, 19.9.1994., 22. lpp.

(4)OV L 216, 8.8.1997., 85. lpp.

(5)OV L 195, 11.7.1998., 25. lpp.

(6)OV L 195, 11.7.1998., 37. lpp.

(7)OV L 54, 25.2.2002., 1. lpp.

(8)OV L 55, 1.3.2003., 74. lpp.

(9)OV L 55, 1.3.2003., 80. lpp.

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----
2079_Hawthorn_5A_Part_III_Process_Data_notes.txt

This file contains additional information for the 2079_Hawthorn_5A_Part_III_Process_Data.xls Process Data_Metals_Testing worksheet: The Flue Ga s Flow Rate (dscfm) was calculated by using plant provided data in scfm and average moisture data for the metals test series.

Page 1
Exhibit 10.68
                               AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
                            THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This  Amendment  No. 2 to the  Employment  Agreement  ("Amendment  No. 2"),
effective as of January 1, 1999,  is entered into by and between  Tanknology-NDE
International, Inc., a Delaware corporate (the "Company") and A. Daniel Sharplin
(the  "Executive").  Capitalized  terms used herein but not defined herein shall
have the meaning  assigned to them in the Employment  Agreement (the "Employment
Agreement"),  dated as of July 1,  1997,  by and  between  the  Company  and the
Executive.

     Pursuant to Section 3(a) of the  Employment  Agreement,  the Base Salary of
the  Executive is increased  by the sum of $40,000 per annum from  $250,000,  as
provided in the original Employment Agreement,  to $290,000 effective January 1,
1999.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  Company and the  Executive  have  executed  this
Amendment No. 2 effective as of January 1, 1999.


TANKNOLOGY-NDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.


BY:
         Jay Allen Chaffee
         Chairman of the Board



EXECUTIVE


BY:
         A. Daniel Sharplin
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 21
- 00200
- CR

__________________ IN RE PATRICK ANDRE DENLEY

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 252nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 81756

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
In a petition ask ing this Court to issue a writ of mandamus , Patrick Andre Denley complains the judgment the trial court signed in T rial C ause N umber 81756 is inconsistent with the oral pronouncement of his sentence

. For the reasons explained below, we deny Den ley’s petition. The judgment from Denley’s criminal case

— a judgment signed in December
20 0 0

— re f lects Denley was convicted of robbery . Based on Denley ’s status as a repeat offender, coupled with the plea bargain agreement he made with the State, the trial court assessed a thirty

- year sentence. The record also shows the State agreed to2 abandon the allegations in the indictment charging he committed the robbery “by using and exhibiting a deadly weapon, to wit: a firearm.” In his petition, Denley complain s th e judgment reflects he was convicted of a first

- degree felony when under the plea agreement he made with the State, the agreement shows he was to be convicted of a second

- degree felony and sentenced as a repeat offender

. Denley argues he should now be allowed to withdraw his plea and that he should not be subjected to any further prosecution of the State’s claim alleging he was guilty of committing a robbery. In part, Denley ’s petition asks for this Court to release him from prison. But we do not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus in a case seeking to overturn a defendant’s conviction on a felony

. 1 Additionally, t he judge who signed the judgment in Denley’s case in 2000 no longer holds office . Yet Denley failed to name th at judge who succeeded the judge who signed the judgment in the case he seeks to overturn as a respondent in the petition he filed in this Court. In addition , Denley did nothing to show that the judge currently presiding over the 252nd District Court either f ailed or refused to rule on
a mot i on properly filed in that court within a reasonable period of time. 2

1 See Tex. Code. Crim

. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 ; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 2 See In re Fields , 619 S.W.3d 394, 395 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2021, orig. proceeding) (to obtain mandamus relief form the appellate court, a relator must show3 For all these reasons, Denley has not shown he is entitled to relief on the petition for mandamus he filed in this Court.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM Submitted on July 27 , 2021 Opinion Delivered July 28, 2021 Do Not Publish Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.

that he filed a motion with the curre n t judge an d that the current judge failed to act after having had an adequate time to rule ).
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 8, 2011

0405 

# Order

April 8, 2011

142228

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142228 COA: 292942 Hillsdale CC: 08-321794-FH MICHAEL CARL COOLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 19, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed whet her offense variable (OV) 19 was properly scored at 10 points under MC L 777.49(c), because the defe ndant “interfered with or attempted to interfere with the administration of justi ce,” based on his conduct in throwing away evidence and denying guilt.

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are invite d to file briefs amicus curiae.
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 315 

To authorize the production of records by the Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 10, 2013 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize the production of records by the Committee 

on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. 

Whereas, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs conducted a review of disability claims adjudications made in the Social Security Administration’s 

Huntington, West Virginia Office of Disability Adjudication and Review; 

Whereas, the Committee has received a request from a federal agency for access to records of the Committee’s review; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 315 ATS 

from such control or possession but by permission of the 

Senate; 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Chairman and Ranking Minority 

2 Member of the Committee on Homeland Security and Gov3 ernmental Affairs, acting jointly, are authorized to provide 

4 to law enforcement officials, regulatory agencies, and 

5 other entities or individuals duly authorized by federal or 

6 state governments, records of the Committee’s review of 

7 the disability claims adjudications made in the Social Se8 curity Administration’s Huntington, West Virginia Office 

9 of Disability Adjudication and Review. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, DLA

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pazoo, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David M. Cunic, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
/s/ David M. CunicChief Executive Officer

November 16, 2015








This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
October 16, 2015

Mr. Dill

1028 Broadway Avenue

New Johnsonville, TN 37134

Dear Mr. Dill :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your July 23, 2015, exemption request filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 3115 , but

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you wan t us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.2

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.27 MB)

Tags:Commander, golf, Eagle Eye, dscc

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### In the Matter of Frederick Caro, Petitioner, against Robert C. Weaver, as State Rent Administrator, Respondent, and George Mantzoukas, Intervenor.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

November 21, 1958.

*Olterberg, Steindler, Houston, Rosen*for petitioner.

*Nathan Heller*for respondent.

*John Mamarellis*for intervenor.

Aron Stetjer, J.

The petitioner, a tenant, seeks to review a determination of respondent Rent Commission which resulted in the issuance of a certificate of eviction. The landlord has intervened in the proceeding and makes this motion to change the venue to Queens County. The apartment in question is located in that county.

The venue of proceedings against a State body or officer is governed by section 1287 of the Civil Practice Act, which fixes it as the district where the officer made his determination, or where the material facts took place, or where the principal office of the respondent is located. Here, the determination was made and the material facts took place in Queens.

In *Matter of Lacqua*v. *O'Connell*(280 App. Div. 31) the court had before it an application to review a determination of the State Liquor Authority. There the facts giving rise to the determination took place in Kings County, the determination was made in New York County and the Authority had its principal office in Albany County. Venue for the application was laid in New York County. The court did not question that this was permissible under the statute, but stated that the proceeding could be best heard and determined where the material facts took place. And of its own motion the court transferred the matter. It is true that the Justices of the Appellate Division *559of the Second Department agreed in the reasoning and acquiesced in the transfer before it was made. But this was merely a courtesy.

The same statute is here involved. No distinction between the relation of the situs of the incident and the functioning of the regulatory body has been found as between the Rent Commission and the Liquor Authority. Nor is any distinction in the convenience of litigants due to the distance to be travelled discoverable. The key to the situation is to be found in the statement of the court (p. 32) —“It will be expected that future proceedings of this nature will be brought in the judicial district of such county ’ ’, referring to the county where the materia] facts took place.

The reason is obvious. It is the proper distribution of judicial business, relegating it wherever feasible to the geographical unit where it arose. It may be argued that the time and energy involved in determining the proper forum may be equal or greater than that required for the question involved, and thus the purpose is defeated. The answer Res in the implied direction expressed in the expectation that counsel will hereafter initiate proceedings in the county indicated.

Motion granted and the clerk is directed to transfer all papers to the Special Term of Supreme Court, Queens County.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 46242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19777]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10541]


Certification Pursuant to Sections 7045(a)(3)(A) of the 
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs 
Appropriations Act, 2018

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as the Secretary of State, 
including pursuant to section 7045(a)(3)(A) of the Department of State, 
Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2018 (Div. 
K, Pub. L. 115-141) (SFOAA), I hereby certify that the central 
government of Guatemala is:
    <bullet> Informing its citizens of the dangers of the journey to 
the southwest border of the United States;
    <bullet> combating human smuggling and trafficking;
    <bullet> improving border security, including preventing illegal 
migration, human smuggling and trafficking, and trafficking of illicit 
drugs and other contraband; and
    <bullet> cooperating with United States Government agencies and 
other governments in the region to facilitate the return, repatriation, 
and reintegration of illegal migrants arriving at the southwest border 
of the United States who do not qualify for asylum, consistent with 
international law.
    This certification shall be published in the Federal Register and, 
along with the accompanying Memorandum of Justification, shall be 
reported to Congress.

    Dated: August 11, 2018.
Michael R. Pompeo,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2018-19777 Filed 9-11-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-29-P