alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 353 

Designating September 2014 as ‘‘National Brain Aneurysm Awareness 

Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2014 

Mr. MARKEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2014 as ‘‘National Brain Aneurysm 

Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas a brain aneurysm is an abnormal saccular or 

fusiform bulging of an artery in the brain; 

Whereas an estimated 1 out of every 50 people in the United 

States has a brain aneurysm; 

Whereas brain aneurysms are most likely to occur in people 

between the ages of 35 and 60 and there are typically no 

warning signs; 

Whereas brain aneurysms are more likely to occur in women 

than in men by a 3-to-2 ratio; 

Whereas young and middle aged African-Americans have a 

higher risk of brain aneurysm rupture compared to Caucasian Americans; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 353 IS 

Whereas various risk factors can contribute to the formation 

of a brain aneurysm, including smoking, hypertension, 

and a family history of brain aneurysms; 

Whereas approximately 6,000,000 people in the United 

States have a brain aneurysm; 

Whereas an unruptured brain aneurysm can lead to double 

vision, vision loss, loss of sensation, weakness, loss of balance, incoordination, and speech problems; 

Whereas a brain aneurysm is often discovered when it ruptures and causes a subarachnoid hemorrhage; 

Whereas a subarachnoid hemorrhage can lead to brain damage, hydrocephalus, stroke, and death; 

Whereas each year, more than 30,000 people in the United 

States suffer from ruptured brain aneurysms and 40 percent of these people die as a result; 

Whereas annually, between 3,000 and 4,500 people in the 

United States with ruptured brain aneurysms die before 

reaching the hospital; 

Whereas a number of advancements have been made in recent years regarding the detection of aneurysms, including the computerized tomography (CT) scan, the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) test, and the cerebral 

arteriogram, and early detection can save lives; 

Whereas various research studies are currently being conducted in the United States in order to better understand, prevent, and treat brain aneurysms; and 

Whereas the month of September would be an appropriate 

month to designate as ‘‘National Brain Aneurysm Awareness Month’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 353 IS 

1 (1) designates September 2014 as National 

2 Brain Aneurysm Awareness Month; and 

3 (2) continues to support research to prevent, 

4 detect, and treat brain aneurysms. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 13824-000; Project No. 13826-000]

                    The Commission has received two preliminary permit applications deemed filed on August 6, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.,[1]                                          for proposed projects to be located on the Ouachita River, in Caldwell Parish, Louisiana. The applications were filed by FFP Missouri 17, LLC for Project No. 13824-000 and BOST2 Hydroelectric, LLC for Project No. 13826-000.                

                    On February 22, 2012, at 9 a.m. (Eastern Time), the Secretary of the Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided in section 4.37 of its regulations.[2]                                          The priority established by this drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed application.                

The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing the results of the drawing.

Dated: February 10, 2012.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any document received after regular business hours is considered filed at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) (2011).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             CFR 4.37 (2011).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2012-3633 Filed 2-15-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 463



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION II No. CR-13-1099

TERRELL WAYNE HOOD APPELLANT
V.
STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered September 17, 2014 APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR-2012-511] HONORABLE MICHAEL A. MAGGIO, JUDGE AFFIRMED
JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge This is an appeal from a probation revocation. Appellant pled guilty on April 4, 2013, to charges of possession of a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia, and driving with a suspended license. He was placed on probation for a period of five years, conditioned, inter alia , on meeting with the probation office in a regular and timely manner. A petition to revoke was filed after appellant failed to appear at his initial probation intake. After a hearing, the trial court found that appellant violated the terms of his probation and sentenced him to six years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court employed the wrong standard in determining his punishment and that the revocation hearing was untimely. We affirm. Appellant argues for the first time on appeal that the trial court employed the wrong standard by failing to exercise its discretion in deciding whether or not to revoke. We cannot address this issue because appellant failed to object to the sentence imposed at the revocationCite as 2014 Ark. App. 463

hearing; the issue is therefore not preserved for appellate review. Mixon v. State , 330 Ark. 171, 954 S.W.2d 214 (1997). Appellant next argues that the probation hearing was untimely because he was initially incarcerated on revocation charges and remained incarcerated for over sixty days. Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-93-307(b)(2) (Supp. 2013) provides that a revocation hearing must be held within sixty days of an arrest for a probation violation. However, this is not in the nature of a speedy-trial provision, Miller v. State , 2011 Ark. App. 554, 386 S.W.3d 65, and is mandatory only when one is arrested for the violation of the conditions of his probation. Id . Where the accused is incarcerated on other charges, the limitation is inapplicable. Id

. Here, appellant was arrested for a probation violation on May 29, 2013. Less than two weeks later, on June 10, the petition to revoke was dismissed based on appellant’s agreement to a negotiated plea (on which he later reneged). Appellant remained incarcerated on other charges. Upon determining that appellant had rejected the plea offer, the revocation petition was refiled on August 15. The revocation hearing was then held promptly on August 28, less than two weeks after the petition was refiled. Therefore, although appellant may in fact have been incarcerated from April until August 2013, less than thirty days of the incarceration was attributable to the revocation charges, and the sixty-day limitation set out in section 16-93-307(b)(2) was not violated. Affirmed. WALMSLEY and H IXSON , JJ., agree. Brian G. Brooks, Attorney at Law, PLLC, by: Brian G. Brooks , for appellant. Dustin McDaniel , Att’y Gen., by: Nicana C. Sherman , Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.55 MB)

Tags:#20thEMS, #shawafb, #EMS, #FabricationFlight, #FabFlight, #Airmen, #AirForce

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                         78,039
<SECURITIES>                                   84,640
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,410
<ALLOWANCES>                                   18,707
<INVENTORY>                                    13,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               294,004
<PP&E>                                         151,118
<DEPRECIATION>                                 53,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 655,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          79,590
<BONDS>                                        163,143
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       404
<OTHER-SE>                                     402,824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   655,218
<SALES>                                        506,590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               517,309
<CGS>                                          360,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  360,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               71,945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                81,172
<INCOME-TAX>                                   30,765
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            50,295
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   50,295
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.27
        


</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.34 MB)

Tags:Naval Air Systems Command, DLA Aviation, F/A-18, Hornet, Super Hornet, Rhino Recovery

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

 

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Coast Oil Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|                     | The Bank of New York Mellon Trust   Company,   N.A., Trustee for Pacific Coast Oil Trust |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                                                     |   |
| Date: July 31, 2018 | By:                                                                                      | /s/ SARAH NEWELL |
|                     |                                                                                     | Sarah Newell |
| * *                 | * *                                                                                 | *Vice President   and Trust Officer* |

 

----
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




GRACO INC.




EXECUTIVE OFFICER INCENTIVE COMPENSATION RECOUPMENT POLICY




In the event that after a cash incentive award granted under the Graco Inc. Executive Officer
Annual Incentive Bonus Plan or the Graco Inc. Executive Officer Bonus Plan to an executive
officer of Graco Inc. (the “Company”) is paid, but prior to a Change of Control (as defined
in the employment agreement between the Company and such executive
officer) the Company
issues a material restatement of a financial statement because of material noncompliance by
the Company with applicable financial reporting requirements due to an executive officer’s
intentional misconduct or fraud, each executive officer shall, at the request of the
Management Organization and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) made within 90 days
after the restatement, remit to the Company the Net Proceeds (as hereafter defined) of such
cash incentive awards. The “Net Proceeds” of an award shall equal the portion of the payment
made with respect to the cash incentive award that the executive officer would not have been
entitled to receive if the financial results had been as reported in the restatement, net of
taxes paid or payable by the executive officer with respect to the forfeited payment.




In addition, for any executive officer who engaged in intentional misconduct or fraud that
caused or contributed to the need for such a restatement, such executive officer shall, at
the request of the Committee made within 90 days after the restatement, remit to the Company
the entire amount of any cash incentive payment received by the executive officer, net of
taxes paid or payable by the executive officer with respect to the forfeited payment.




The Committee may, but shall not be required by the executive officer to, reduce the
forfeiture, return and/or payment obligations hereunder to the extent that the Committee, in
its sole and absolute discretion, shall deem appropriate. Nothing herein shall limit any
other rights the Company shall have by law for misconduct of the executive officer that
caused or contributed to the need for such restatement.
----

| **NEVADA**                                                    | **36-4752858**                      |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.) |
|   | Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer         | ☐ |
|--------|-------------------------|---------|---------------------------|---------|
|   | Non-accelerated filer   | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☒ |

----

| 31.1   | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                     |
| 31.2   | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|   |                                                                     |
| 32     | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.         |

----

|              | MASCOTA RESOURCES CORP. |                                                      |
|-------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|              |                    |                                                      |   |
|              |                    |                                                      |   |
| November 18, 2016 | By:                     | /s/ Dale Rasmussen                                        |   |
|              |                    | Dale Rasmussen, Principal Executive and Financial Officer |   |
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Solin Hoem,
the Chief Financial Officer of GLORYWIN ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



1.     
The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.     
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of
the undersigned has executed this statement this 15th day of June, 2022.





/s/ Solin Hoem

Solin Hoem

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to Glorywin Entertainment Group Inc. and will be retained by Glorywin Entertainment Group Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The forgoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Ultitek, Ltd. (the “Registrant”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roman Price, the
      President and Chief Executive Officer, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Date:
                August 19, 2008
            
            /s/
                ROMAN PRICERoman
                PricePresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer) of Ultitek, Ltd.