alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices 

# Order

July 22, 2011

142177 & (15)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142177 COA: 299228 Berrien CC: 2009-015594-FH DAVID IVAN FREEZE, II, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of April 28 , 2011, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the appli cation for leave to appeal is again considered, and it is DENIED, becaus e we are not persuaded that the question presented should be revi ewed by this Court.

Y OUNG , C.J. ( concurring ).

Even assuming, without deciding, that an at torney renders ineffe ctive assistance of

counsel where he fails to advise his client that the client will be required to register under the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) if he pleads guilty, see People v Fonville

, ___ Mich App ___ (No. 294554, i ssued January 25, 2011), defe ndant in this case cannot demonstrate prejudice necessary to accord relief. See Strickland v Washington , 466 US 668 (1984); People v Carbin , 463 Mich 590 (2001). As the Berrein Circuit Court determined at a hearing conducted pursuant to People v Ginther , 390 Mich 436 (1973), even though defense counsel advised defe ndant that counsel was unaware whether defendant would have to regist er as a sex offender if he pl eaded guilty to two counts of possessing child sexually abusiv e material and one count of using a computer to commit the crime, defendant nevertheless pleaded guilty with the actual know ledge that he might have to register as a sex offender. Becaus e, by his own admission, defendant agreed to plead guilty with the knowledge that SORA registration mi ght be required, he cannot demonstrate a reasonable probability that the result of the proceedi ng would have been

different even if counsel had informed him of the mandatory SORA registration requirements.I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 22, 2011

y0719 2

M ARKMAN and M ARY B ETH K ELLY , JJ., join the statement of Y OUNG , C.J.

M ARILYN K ELLY , J., would remand this case to the trial court for reconsideration in light of People v Fonville , ___ Mich App ___ (2011) (D ocket No. 294554, decided January 25, 2011).

Z AHRA , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 6201

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CURTIS WASHINGTON, a/k/a Murk , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 4:16

- cr - 00050

- FL

- 1 ; 4:18

- cv - 00189

- FL )

Submitted : September 1, 2022 Decided: October 6, 2022

Before DIAZ, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Curtis Washington , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6201 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/06/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Curtis Washington seeks to appeal t he district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Washington’s 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by dem onstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner mus t demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Washington has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6201 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/06/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10539-10540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4110]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review of RFA DE 12-006 and -007 
Oral Diseases in Medically Compromised Patients (R21, R01).
    Date: March 13, 2012.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Jonathan Horsford, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Natl Inst of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National 
Insitutes

[[Page 10540]]

of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 664, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
594-4859, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adc5c2dfdecbc2dfc7edc0ccc4c183c3c4c583cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="254d4a5756434a574f6548444c490b4b4c4d0b424a53">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 14, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-4110 Filed 2-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00 633

- C R



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

GUADALUPE DE LEON AC UNA , Appellant,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On a ppeal from the 389 th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is currently before the Court on appellant's third motion for extension of

time to file the brief. The clerk’s record was filed on January 2 7 , 2014 and a ppellant ’ s
brief was originally due to be filed thirty days thereafter. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(a).

T his Court has previously granted appellant two extensions of time totaling one hundred2

and fifty

- two days to file the brief, and appellant now seeks an additional ninety days, until

October 28 , 2014, to file the brief. By order previously issued in this cause, the Court

ordered counsel to file the brief, informed counsel that the Court looked with disfav or on
the delay caused by counsel’s failure to timely file a brief in this matter , and informed

counsel that n o further extensions of time would be granted absent exigent

circumstances. By his third motion for extension of time, counsel asserts that good cause
exists to grant this final extension of time because it will be necessary for counsel to order

and review an additional trial transcript for full and adequate briefing on the issue of

collateral estoppel in this case. Counsel asserts that his client and opposing counsel are

in agreement with the request for an extension of time.

Accordingly, based on the exigent circumstances described, we GRANT

appellant’s third request for extension of time to file the brief

. The brief is now due on or

before Oc tober 28, 2014. I f counsel fails to file the brief within the specified period of

time, the Court will act appropriately to ensure that appellant's rights are protected. See

id. R. 38.8(b)(4).

PER CURIAM

Justice Perkes dissenting without separate order.

Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 6 th day of August, 2014.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2.38 MB)

Tags:#MarianasStrong #TyphoonYutu #Yutu #TyphoonYutuArmyReserve #9thM

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 10.7






EXHIBIT 10.7




Acknowledgement and Amendment of Employment Agreement




WHEREAS, the undersigned employee (the “Executive”) of Pride International, Inc. (the
“Company”) and the Company are parties to that certain Amended and Restated
Employment/Non-Competition/Confidentiality Agreement, effective as of December 31, 2008 (the
“Employment Agreement”); and



WHEREAS, the Company desires to terminate the car allowance benefit recited in Section 3.04 of
the Employment Agreement (the “Car Allowance”) in exchange for the Company’s agreement to reimburse
the Executive for up to $10,000 per calendar year of expenses the Executive incurs related to tax,
estate and/or financial advisory services (the “Financial Services”), subject to any conditions
specified by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, including, but not
limited to, reimbursement in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code; and



WHEREAS, the Executive agrees to the termination of the Car Allowance in exchange for the
Financial Services benefit, subject to any conditions specified by the Compensation Committee of
the Company’s Board of Directors; and



WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6.09 of the Employment Agreement, no provision of the Employment
Agreement may be amended, waived or discharged except by the mutual written agreement of the
parties.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises herein and the consideration recited above,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to this
Acknowledgement and Amendment of the Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”), effective as of
January 1, 2010, as follows:



1. From and after January 1, 2010, the Executive hereby acknowledges that the Company is no
longer obligated to provide to the Executive the Car Allowance.



2. The Executive hereby waives any right to the Car Allowance and discharges the Company from
the obligation to provide the Car Allowance.



3. From and after January 1, 2010, the Company agrees to provide to Executive the Financial
Services benefit, subject to any conditions specified by the Compensation Committee of the
Company’s Board of Directors.



4. The Executive acknowledges that the Company’s ceasing to provide the Car Allowance does not
constitute an involuntary termination or a constructive termination under the Employment Agreement.



5. The Executive and the Company hereby agree that the Employment Agreement is deemed to be
amended and modified to affect the intent of this Amendment.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set his hand, and the Company has caused these
presents to be executed in its name and on its behalf, on the dates indicated below, but effective
as of January 1, 2010.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	EXECUTIVE	 	PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Lonnie D. Bane
 

Name (please print)

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Brady K. Long
 

Name: Brady K. Long
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Title: Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Lonnie D. Bane
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Executive’s Signature

	 	 	 	Date: April 14, 2010	 	 






Date: March 15, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 155 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 155

 Recognizing the City of Erie, Pennsylvania, for its critical role in 
   the development and construction of the fleet of Commodore Oliver 
                  Hazard Perry during the War of 1812.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2013

Mr. Casey submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the City of Erie, Pennsylvania, for its critical role in 
   the development and construction of the fleet of Commodore Oliver 
                  Hazard Perry during the War of 1812.

Whereas the City of Erie, Pennsylvania, due to its abundant resources and 
        strategic positioning, was recommended by shipbuilder Daniel Dobbins to 
        the United States Department of the Navy as an ideal location for the 
        construction of a naval fleet;
Whereas the victory by the United States over Great Britain in the Battle of 
        Lake Erie on September 10, 1813, was a crucial victory for the United 
        States during the War of 1812, and ensured that the United States 
        maintained control over Lake Erie for the duration of the war;
Whereas the success of the fleet of Commodore Oliver Hazard Perry in the Battle 
        of Lake Erie helped to facilitate the important victory of General 
        William Henry Harrison at the Battle of the Thames, as well as other 
        military actions of the United States throughout the War of 1812;
Whereas the USS Lawrence and the USS Niagara, 2 flagships of the fleet of 
        Commodore Perry, were returned to Presque Isle Bay, off the coast of the 
        City of Erie, after completion of their service;
Whereas the City of Erie is home to the USS Niagara, which continues to sail in 
        memory of the heroism of the United States forces in the Battle of Lake 
        Erie;
Whereas the City of Erie honors the legacy of Commodore Perry through the Perry 
        Monument at Presque Isle State Park; and
Whereas the City of Erie this year is recognizing the 200th anniversary of the 
        Battle of Lake Erie: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors the City of Erie, Pennsylvania, for its role in 
        the development and construction of the fleet of Commodore 
        Oliver Hazard Perry during the War of 1812; and
            (2) recognizes the historical significance of the 
        construction of the fleet of Commodore Perry and the consequent 
        victory of the United States in the Battle of Lake Erie.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 434 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 434

 Electing Andrew B. Willison as the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of 
                              the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 2014

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Electing Andrew B. Willison as the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of 
                              the Senate.

    Resolved, That Andrew B. Willison of Ohio be, and he is hereby, 
elected Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
FAA submitting exemption for Section 33 for operation of UAV

I Calvin Henshaw am seeking exemption for Section 333. Will operate a business which support local 

businesses in marketing and advertising effors. The equipment utilizes both still photography and full 

videography in support of clients and projects.

All flights are logged, remain under an altitude of 400 feet and with clearance of local ATC.

Operation will be in such a way that it will minimize the risk to public safety, as well as the natural 

environment. My flight time is in excess of 500 hours flying of all types. With no crashes, or damage to 

people and or property.

Regular maintenance and preflight checklist are utilized before, during and after operations.

Calvin Henshaw

19754 Sugarloaf Mt. Rd.

Clermont, Flroida 34715
# pennsylvania
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Northcentral Regional Office March 30, 2012 Jeffery Williams Clearfi eld Municipal Authority 107 E Market Street Clear.J.eld, PA 16830 Re: Return ofNPDES Permit Application No. PA0026310 A-2 Clearfield Municipal Authority WWTP Lawrence Township, Clearfield County Dear Mr
. Williams: The Department has reviewed your letter dated 2/2112012. The letter states that the Clearfield Municipal Authority WWTP ceased accepting shallow well brine wastewater on 2/17/2012. The letter also states that physical separation between the brine receiving station and the treatment pant occurred on 2/20/2012. As requested in your respective letter, the Department is returning the abovementioned NPDES permit amendment application. Please be reminded that ifyou wish o reinstate the acceptance and treatment ofnatural gas well wastewater at your facility that an NPDES permit amendment must first be obtained. All relative correspondence regarding this matter will be kept on file. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Permits Section ofthis office at 570.327.3664. RECEIVED EPA REGION Ill



## APR·o 32012 NPDES PERMITS. BRANCH (3WP41)

Enclosures: NPDES PA002631 0 Amendment Application
cc: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Central Office Regional Office

208 West Third Street 1Suite 101 1Williamsport, PA 17701-6448 570.327.0532 I Fax 570.327.3565 ..-:.-'-**Pr!nt~d** on Recycled Par;er**t~:~:~)** www.depweb.state.pa.us
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (4.46 MB)

Tags:Deploy, 56th FW, CBRN, Airmen, Luke AFB, 56th LRS

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery