alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.32 MB)

Tags:Town Hall, Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, Defense Logistics Agency, Innovation Award

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 131163 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 131163 COA: 258741 Charlevoix CC: 01-059009-FC THOMAS ARYON SHULICK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0821 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 29, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.21A 
Schedule of Named Executive Officers Party to Change of Control Employment Agreement (BE4 and Higher Version) 
(As of December 31, 2015) 
Ralph W. Babb, Jr. 
Jon W. Bilstrom 
David E. Duprey
Curtis C. Farmer
October 22, 2012 

Dennis J. DeVany 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, S.W. 

Washington/ D.C. 20590 

RE: Air Services Proposals for El Centro I Imperial, CA Airport 

Thank you for providing an opportunity to comment regarding the proposals for air services 

for the El Centro/ Imperial, California, Airport. The City of El Centro values the air services and 

current flight schedules. 

The City of El Centro would like to express the importance of early morning departure to Los 

Angeles and late evening return to Imperial. If this service was eliminated, enplanements 

would decrease. A decrease in flights would cause a considerable amount of enplanements to 

"leak" to either Palm Springs, Yuma or San Diego and could cause a significant reduction in 

the amount of entitlement funds the County receives from FAA. The airport relies heavily on 

these FAA grant funds to meet the standards required by FAR part 139. 

A morning flight coupled with a later evening flight provides the most benefit to the 

community, particularly to those who want to do "day trips" to Los Angeles, Sacramento/ or 

San Francisco. In addition the selected air service provider must address the issue of "through 

ticketing" with major airlines and baggage transfer. Without this service/ we believe that the 

quality of the airline service is significantly diminished and would affect bookings. Lastly/ the 

destination airport needs to be a true major hub such as Los Angeles (LAX), San Diego (SAN) 

or Phoenix (PHX). Utilizing other airports will likely discourage thmugh ticketing bookings. 

Please feel free to contact Ruben Duran, City Manager at 760-337-4540 if you have any 

questions. 

Office of the City Manager 

1275 Main Street, El Centro, CA 92243 (760) 337-4540 Fax (760) 352-6177
#### Reubin Marsh, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Porter S. Bennett, M. S. Merrill and E. T. Merrill, *Defendants in Error.*

Appellate Practice — Final Judgment Necessary to Support Writ oe Error.

Where the record brought to an appellate court by writ of error shows that there was no final judgment in the cause from which such writ would lie, the said writ of error will be dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error.

This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Volusia county.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*John W. Price*for plaintiff in error.

*Isaac A. Stew&rt*(with whom was *Egford Bly*on the brief) for defendants in error.

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on for final adjudication before Division A of the court upon the transcript of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, upon due consideration the court finds that there was no final judgment rendered in said cause from which writ of error would lie, and it is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the writ of error in said cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error. *Harrison v. Thurston,*11 Fla. 307; *Gates v. Hayner,*22 Fla. 325; *Ropes v.*Eldridge, 39 Fla. 47, 21. South. Rep. 570.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10768

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

MARIO PEREZ, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:15-CR-271-11

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Mario Perez has moved for leave to 

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 13, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10768 Document: 00513951269 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/13/2017
No. 16-10768

2 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-10768 Document: 00513951269 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/13/2017
Order filed September 18, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 11

- 00888

- CR

____________ JARMONE TYRIC ADAMS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1272904



### ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to T ex as R ule of App ellate P rocedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of States exhibit 1, a DVD and States exhibit 2, a DVD

.The clerk of the 176th District Court is d irected to deliver to the Clerk of this court

the original of States exhibit 1, a DVD and States exhibit 2, a DVD , on or before September 27, 2012

. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection ; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of States exhibit 1, a DVD and States exhibit 2, a DVD , to the clerk of the 176th District Court.

PER CURIAM
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

JUL 0 2 2015 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MEMO RAD UM 

From: 

To: 

Rebecca von dem Hagen, EPA/Stratospheric Protection Division 7 / l/ IS 

EPA Air Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0198 

Subject: Comments Submitted After the Close of the Public Comment Period on the 

Proposed SNAP Status Change Rule 

EPA provided a public comment period on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking from August 6, 

2014 to October 20, 2014, which included an initial 60-day comment period and a 14-day 

extension. EPA has provided responses to comments submitted during the public comments 

period within the preamble to the final rule and in the Response to Comments document. The 

following is a list of entities that submitted comments after the close of the comment period. 

Because these comments were submitted after the close of the comment period, EPA is not 

required to provide a response. The comments are available in the docket. 

Environmental Defense Fund- Submitted October 22, 2014. 

Rheem Manufacturing Company- Submitted October 22, 2014. 

GE Appliances and Lighting-Submitted October 24, 2015 

Honeywell International, Inc. - Submitted November 11 , 2014. 

Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLC Submission of European Commission Statement of 

Objection to Honeywell and DuPont- Submitted November 21 , 2014. 

Johnson Controls Incorporated- Submitted December 7, 2014. 

EUR OM II group - a consortium of laboratory instrumentation and equipment 

associations in Europe-Submitted December 16, 2014. 

Internet Address (URL) • http //www epa gov 

Recycled/Recyclable · Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
The International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement 

Workers of America (UAW)-Submitted December 15, 2014. 

Air Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) - Submitted December 

19, 2014. 

ASHRAE- Submitted March 5, 2015. 

The American Trucking Association (ATA)-Submitted May 6, 2015.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 349 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 349

 Celebrating the 30<SUP>th</SUP> Anniversary of the Walla Walla Valley 
                      American Viticultural Area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 6, 2014

  Ms. Cantwell (for herself and Mrs. Murray) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Celebrating the 30<SUP>th</SUP> Anniversary of the Walla Walla Valley 
                      American Viticultural Area.

Whereas the Walla Walla Valley American Viticultural Area was designated an 
        American Viticultural Area on February 6, 1984;
Whereas the Walla Walla Valley American Viticultural Area is considered one of 
        the most awarded and recognized of the American Viticultural Areas in 
        the United States;
Whereas in 2013, 4 Walla Walla Valley American Viticultural Area wines were 
        selected by 3 leading wine publications as among the top 100 wines in 
        the world;
Whereas the wine industry contributes over $500 million annually to the economy 
        of Walla Walla County;
Whereas jobs in the wine industry are steadily growing in Walla Walla County and 
        are expected to account for 20 percent of jobs in Walla Walla County by 
        2020;
Whereas the number of wineries in the Walla Walla Valley American Viticultural 
        Area has grown from 4 in 1984 to approximately 130 today;
Whereas agricultural land devoted to growing wine grapes in the Walla Walla 
        Valley American Viticultural Area has grown from 30 acres in 1984 to 
        1,800 acres in 2013; and
Whereas Walla Walla Valley American Viticultural Area wines are consistently 
        rated highly by critics and enjoyed by wine connoisseurs around the 
        world: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commends the Walla Walla Valley American Viticultural 
        Area on the occasion of its 30 year anniversary;
            (2) recognizes the Walla Walla Valley American Viticultural 
        Area as a pioneer in the wine industry of Washington; and
            (3) requests the Secretary of the Senate to transmit an 
        enrolled copy of this resolution for appropriate display to the 
        Walla Walla Valley Wine Alliance.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

LKQ CORPORATION, KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE

INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Appellants

v.

GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC,

Appellee

______________________

2022-1253

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. PGR2020-

00055.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

Before MOORE, Chief Judge, LOURIE, DYK, PROST, REYNA,

TARANTO, CHEN, HUGHES, STOLL, and STARK, Circuit 

Judges.*

* Circuit Judge Newman and Circuit Judge Cunningham did not participate. Circuit Judge Clevenger, who was 

a member of the original panel, also did not participate.

Case: 22-1253 Document: 87 Page: 1 Filed: 08/23/2024
LKQ CORPORATION v.

GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC

2

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Before the court is a joint motion by Appellants LKQ 

Corporation and Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. 

(“LKQ”) and Appellee GM Global Technology Operations 

LLC (“GM”) (collectively, the “Parties”). Dkt. 86. The Parties jointly requested that in light of LKQ Corp. v. GM 

Global Technology Operations LLC, 102 F.4th 1280 

(Fed. Cir. 2024) (“En Banc Decision”), we resolve LKQ’s 

pending request for rehearing en banc, Dkt. 50 (Mar. 23, 

2023), by: (1) vacating Dkt. 45 (Jan. 20, 2023) (“Panel Decision”) as to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s non-obviousness determination in the appealed Final Written 

Decision, PGR2020-00055, Dkt. 33 (Oct. 8, 2021) (“FWD”); 

(2) vacating the Board’s non-obviousness determination in 

the FWD; (3) affirming, consistent with the Panel Decision, 

the Board’s finding of no anticipation; and (4) remanding 

to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this 

court’s En Banc Decision. Dkt. 86 at 1.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Parties’ joint motion to vacate in part and remand (Dkt. 86) is granted as follows;

(2) The Panel Decision (Dkt. 45) affirming the Board’s 

FWD is vacated with respect to the panel’s affirmance of 

the Board’s holding of non-obviousness under the RosenDurling test; 

(3) The Board’s finding of no anticipation in the FWD

is affirmed;

(4) The Board’s non-obviousness determination in the 

FWD is vacated;

(5) The case is remanded to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this court’s En Banc Decision; and

Case: 22-1253 Document: 87 Page: 2 Filed: 08/23/2024
LKQ CORPORATION v.

GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC

3

(6) The pending request for rehearing en banc 

(Dkt. 50) is denied as moot.

August 23, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 23, 2024. 

 

 

Case: 22-1253 Document: 87 Page: 3 Filed: 08/23/2024
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Aaron Philip Fernandez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-21-00541-CR

Trial court case number: 1609682

Trial court: 177th District Court of Harris County

On February 15, 2022, Appellant Aaron Philip Fernandez filed a “Motion to Withdraw 

and Motion to Substitute Counsel,” requesting that Seth Kretzer be allowed to withdraw as 

Appellant’s counsel and Kristen Jernigan be substituted as Appellant’s counsel. Appellant’s

motion is granted. 

The Clerk of this Court is directed to note Seth Kretzer’s withdrawal as counsel for 

Appellant and to substitute Kristen Jernigan as counsel for Appellant on the docket of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy

Acting individually 

Date: February 24, 2022
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2.19 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Multicultural Committee, DLA, Native American Heritage

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
NUMBER 13-22-00339-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

JERRY E. CRAWFORD AND 

DEBORAH J. CRAWFORD, Appellants,

 v.

GREATHOUSE ROAD PARTNERS, LLC 

AND TRES GROUP, LLC Appellees.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 40th District Court

of Ellis County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

This matter is before the Court on appellants’ unopposed amended motion to 

dismiss appeal.

1 Appellants request dismissal, and appellees will not be prevented from 

seeking relief to which they would otherwise be entitled. 

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket 
2

The Court, having considered appellants’ motion, is of the opinion that the motion 

should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, appellants’ unopposed 

amended motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. In 

accordance with the unopposed motion, costs will be taxed against the party incurring the 

same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). Because the appeal is dismissed at appellants’

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

JAIME TIJERINA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

15th day of December, 2022.

equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.43 MB)

Tags:DSCR, DLA Installation Operations Richmond, pool, MWR, swimming, summer, people and culture

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery