alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.07 MB)

Tags:Clothing & Textiles, Flag ladies, PA Lt. Gov. Mike Stack, DLA Troop Support

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 10.35
Summary of Cost-U-Less, Inc. Non-EmployeeDirector Compensation
     Our non-employeedirectors are paid $2,500 for each meeting of the board of directors attended and $250 for each committee meeting attended. Thechairman of the board and the chairman of the compensation committee are paid an additional $500 for each board or compensationcommittee meeting they chaired, and the chairman of the audit committee is paid an additional $1,000 for each audit committeemeeting chaired. We also reimburse directors for travel expenses in attending meetings.
     Each non-employeedirector also receives an automatic annual grant of options to purchase 1,000 shares of common stock under our 1998 stock incentivecompensation plan on the date of each year’s annual meeting.
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-20-0000415

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS, AFSCME, LOCAL 646, AFL-CIO, Complainant-Appellant/Appellee v. CHRISTINA KISHIMOTO, Superintendent, Department of Education, State of Hawai # i, Respondent-Appellee/Appellant, and HAWAII LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; MARCUS OSHIRO; SESNITA A.D. MOEPONO, and J N. MUSTO,

Agency-Appellees/Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 191001179)

ORDER APPROVING IN PART STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF APPEAL (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Chan and Hiraoka, JJ.) Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal of Appeal Without Prejudice (Stipulation), filed July 20, 2020, by Complainant-Appellant/Appellee United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the appeal has been docketed; (2) the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal without prejudice and bear their own attorneys' fees and costs; (3) the Stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal; and (4) dismissal is authorized by Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-20-0000415 22-JUL-2020 09:31 AMN O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### Stipulation is approved in part and the appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, July 22, 2020. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge /s/ Keith H. Hiraoka Associate Judge

2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (11.49 MB)

Tags:Snow Warriors

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-31010

Conference Calendar

 

CHARLES A. BADEAUX,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STATE OF LOUISIANA; JUDGE SUSAN

M. CHEHARDY; JEFFERSON PARISH

SHERIFF’S OFFICE; HARRY LEE,

Sheriff,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC Nos. 95-CV-2240, 95-CV-2432

- - - - - - - - - -

June 26, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Charles A. Badeaux, Louisiana pre-trial detainee, #162692,

appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Appellant argues

that the defendants violated his constitutional rights because

the law library at the Jefferson Parish Correctional Center in
No. 95-31010

- 2 -

which he was incarcerated did not have a “Black’s Law

Dictionary.”

We have reviewed the record, the district court’s opinion,

and Badeaux’s brief, and find no abuse of discretion. Badeaux’s

appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d

215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); see 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution

Badeaux that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will

invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Badeaux

is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that

they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have

been previously decided by this court.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
**ORDER**

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21

- 0336 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. GINA DELIGHT KRUEGER ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

o f time to and including March 24 , 2022 , within which to prepare, file, and serve her opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 11 2022

02/11/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0336
### NUMBER 13 - 1 9 - 00 22 8 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ PLAINSCAPITAL BANK AND ALBERT CHAPA , A ppellant s ,
v. ANDY HERNANDEZ , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 229th District Court Of Starr County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria Appellant s PlainsCapital Bank and Albert Chapa attempted to perfect an appeal from an April 17, 2019 order denying their motion to compel ar bitration in cause number DC

- 17

- 712 in the 229th District Court of Starr County, Texas. On May 17, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants that it did not appear that we had jurisdiction over the appeal and requested correction of this defect, if it could be done. See T EX

. R. A PP

.2 P. 37.1, 42.3. The Clerk further notified appellants that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected after the expiration of ten days from receipt of the Court’s notice. Appellants have not replied to the Co urt’s notice

. The State of Texas is divided into fourteen court of appeals districts with a court of appeals in each district. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.201(a). “Each court of appeals has appellate jurisdiction of all civil cases within its district of which the district courts or county courts have jurisdiction when the amount in controversy or the judgment rendered exceeds $250, exclusive of interest and costs.” I d. § 22.220 (a) ; see T EX

. C ONST

. art. V, § 6

. In this case, the order appealed from was not from a district or county court in our court of appeals district. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.201(n). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See id. § 22.220(a); Kim v. State , 181 S.W.3d 448, 449 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2005, no pet.)

. The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. See T E X

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a),(c). All pending motions, if any, are likewise dismissed for want of jurisdiction. NORA L. LONGORIA Justice
D elivered and filed the 18th day of July, 2019.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Randall K. Zanatta, certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golf Galaxy, Inc.;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: October 10, 2006 |     | /s/ RANDALL K. ZANATTA                            |   |   |
|------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                   |     | Randall K. Zanatta                                |   |
| * *               | * * | *President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman* |   |

 

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.34 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### Althaus, Appellee, *v.*Sheipline, Appellee; Elliott, Appellant.

(No. 30720

Decided February 28, 1947.)

*Mr. R. S. Steiner*and *Mr. J. K. Rockey,*for appellee L. E. Althaus.

*Messrs. Gable & Gable,*for appellant.

*539It is ordered and adjudged, *sua sponte,*that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Bell, JJ., concur.

Sohngen, J., not participating.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RICHARD DWAYNE TEEL, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 11

- 00217

- CR

Appeal from the

396th District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC#1200565D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and A ntcliff, JJ.

Antcliff, J., not participating
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2.17 MB)

Tags:relief efforts, national guard, air national guard, hurricane michael, hurricanemichael18, miller county

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-12325

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

ELIZABETH KORCZ, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Respondent-Appellee.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

D.C. Docket No. 2:23-cv-08002-RDP

____________________

USCA11 Case: 23-12325 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 09/25/2023 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 23-12325

Before WILSON, NEWSOM, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. The 60-day statutory time limit required Elizabeth Korcz to 

file a notice of appeal from the district court’s April 18, 2023 memorandum opinion and separate order denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

motion to vacate on or before June 20, 2023. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), 26(a)(1)(C). However, Korcz 

did not file her notice of appeal until July 11, 2023. 

Further, the district court entered its final order in a document separate and apart from its accompanying memorandum 

opinion, so the time to appeal began to run that day—April 18, 

2023. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) (providing that every judgment must 

generally “be set out in a separate document”); Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(7) (stating that when a separate document is required, a judgment or order is deemed entered for timeliness purposes when it is 

set forth on a separate document or 150 days have passed from entry of the judgment or order in the civil docket, whichever is earlier); State Nat’l Bank of El Paso v. United States, 488 F.2d 890, 892-93 

(5th Cir. 1974); Weinberger v. United States, 559 F.2d 401, 402 & n.1 

(5th Cir. 1977); Wright v. Preferred Research, Inc., 937 F.2d 1556, 1560 

(11th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and 

cannot invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010).

USCA11 Case: 23-12325 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 09/25/2023 Page: 2 of 3
23-12325 Opinion of the Court 3

All pending motions are DENIED as MOOT. No petition 

for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and 

other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable 

rules.

USCA11 Case: 23-12325 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 09/25/2023 Page: 3 of 3