Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration
 AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration (ETA), Labor.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (Department) is seeking public comment on two proposed UI Performs Core Measures for UI Integrity: (1) UI Improper Payments; and (2) UI Overpayment Recovery.
 DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the addresses section below on or before March 14, 2012.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted to the address specified below. All comments will be made available to the public. **Warning:** Do not include any personally identifiable information (such as name, address, or other contact information) or confidential business information that you do not want publically disclosed. All comments may be posted on the Internet and can be retrieved by most Internet search engines. Comments may be submitted anonymously. *Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov,* identified by Docket ID Number ETA-2012-0001. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
          *Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier:* Please submit all written comments (including disk and CD-ROM submissions) to Mr. Andrew Spisak, U.S. Department of Labor, ETA/Office of Unemployment Insurance, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room S-4524, Washington, DC 20210. Be advised that mail delivery in the Washington, DC area may be delayed due to security concerns. Hand-delivered comments will be received at the above address. All overnight mail will be considered to be hand-delivered and must be received at the designated place by the date specified above. Please submit your comments by only one method. The Department will not review comments received by means other than those listed above or that are received after the comment period has closed. The Department will post all comments received on *http://www.regulations.gov* without making any change to the comments, including any personal information provided. The *http://www.regulations.gov* Web site is a Federal portal, and all comments posted there are available and accessible to the public.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background IPERA [Pub. L. 111-204 (31 U.S.C. 3321 note)] amended the Improper Payments Information Act of 2002 (IPIA) [Pub. L. 107-300 (31 U.S.C. 3321 note)] and established several criteria that Federal agencies must meet in order to be in compliance with the law. According to section 3(a)(3) of IPERA: The term `compliance' means that the agency (F) has reported an improper payment rate of less than 10 percent for each program and activity for which an estimate was published under section 2(b) of the Improper Payments Information Act of 2002 (31 U.S.C. 3321 note). For the 2010 IPIA reporting period, the Department reported an improper payment rate of 11.2 percent (10.6 percent overpayment rate and 0.6 percent underpayment rate) in its Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Agency Financial Report (AFR), p. 179, (*http://www.dol.gov/​_sec/​media/​reports/​annual2010/​2010annualreport.pdf*). For the 2011 IPIA reporting period, the Department reported an improper payment rate of 12.0 percent (11.35 percent overpayment rate and 0.65 percent underpayment rate) in its FY 2011 AFR, p. 204 (*http://www.dol.gov/​_sec/​media/​( print page 7605)reports/​annual2011/​2011annualreport.pdf*). In addition, IPERA establishes requirements for payment recapture audits. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidelines in Appendix C of OMB Circular A-123, Part I(B)(3), established the follow requirements that Federal agencies must follow: [A]ll agencies are required to establish annual targets for their payment recapture audit programs that will drive their annual performance. The targets shall be based on the rate of recovery (*i.e.,* amount of improper overpayments recovered divided by the amount of improper overpayments identified). Agencies have the discretion to set their own payment recapture targets for review and approval by OMB, but agencies shall strive to achieve annual recapture targets of at least 85 percent within three years (with the first reporting year being FY 2011, the second FY 2012, and the third FY 2013). In response, the Department has developed statistical models to set recovery targets based on historical performance data and the Administration's economic assumptions. These targets have been reviewed by OMB and published in the Department's FY 2011 AFR, p. 215. Because the UI improper payment rate exceeds the 10 percent minimum performance level in IPERA, the Department has developed an Integrity Strategic Plan to bring the UI program into compliance. In June 2011, the Department issued a “call to action” in Unemployment Insurance Program Letter (UIPL) No. 19-11 to ensure that UI integrity is a top priority and to provide tools and support for State agencies to develop strategic plans to reduce improper payments. UIPL No. 33-11 (September 21, 2011) launched an initiative to reduce unacceptably high levels of improper payments in six “High Priority” States. The Department will work closely with these States to support cross-functional teams and develop strategic plans to reduce improper payments below the 10 percent IPERA criterion. UIPL No. 34-11 (September 28, 2011) provided information on the definition and implementation of the UI Performs Benefit Year Earnings Core Measure to reduce the leading cause of UI improper payments—claimants who return to work and who continue to claim and collect UI benefits. This notice describes and solicits comments on two proposed performance measures to meet the IPERA statutory requirements. The Department establishes measures that capture key dimensions of UI program performance in accordance with applicable legislation and sets criteria or target levels defining acceptable performance according to the measure. If a State's performance does not attain these levels, the State must take corrective action through its annual State Quality Service Plan (SQSP) (OMB No. 1205-0132, Expiration Date 10/31/2014). Comments should be submitted by the date and to the address provided in the addresses section of this notice. II. Proposed Improper Payments Measure Definition and Acceptable Level of Performance (ALP) *Measure Definition:* Combined percentage of UI benefits overpaid and underpaid, estimated from the results of the Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) survey of paid UI claims in the State UI, Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE), and Unemployment Compensation for Ex-Service Members (UCX) programs. *ALP:* Section 3(a)(3)(F) of IPERA establishes “an improper payment rate of less than 10 percent for each program and activity for which an estimate was published under [IPIA].” Section 2(e) of IPERA amends section 2 of IPIA and defines an improper payment as “any payment that should not have been made or that was made in an incorrect amount (including overpayments and underpayments).” In accordance with IPERA requirements, the Department is proposing an ALP of less than 10 percent, first applicable to calendar year (CY) 2012 performance. State performance for the 2011 IPIA reporting period (July 2010 through June 2011) is provided in Attachment A. This ALP will be effective unless the IPERA and/or IPIA are amended, in which case the Department will bring its ALP into line with the amended requirement. *Calculation:* The measure would be calculated from BAM data using the following data elements: *Total Overpayment Amount for Key Week (BAM data element h5)*—defines the amount overpaid to the claimant in the key week (the paid week selected for audit), excluding overpayments for improper payments caused by another State's workforce agency. The amounts coded in h5 include overpayment codes 10, 11, 12, 13, and 15 in data element ei2 (Key Week Action). Overpayments attributable to a State workforce agency other than the State agency that selected and audited the payment are excluded (Prior Agency Action (data element ei6) codes 90 to 99). *Total Underpayment Amount for Key Week (BAM data element h6)*—defines the amount underpaid to the claimant in the key week, excluding underpayments for improper payments caused by another State's workforce agency. The amounts coded in h6 include underpayment codes 20, 21, and 22 in data element ei2 (Key Week Action). Underpayments attributable to a State workforce agency other than the State agency that selected and audited the payment are excluded (Prior Agency Action (data element ei6) codes 90 to 99). *Original Amount Paid (BAM data element f13)*—defines the amount paid to the claimant in key week. The Annual Report overpayment (OP) rate is the estimate of:  It is derived from the weekly BAM samples; each week's sample result is weighted by the number of paid UI weeks in the BAM survey population. The Annual Report underpayment (UP) rate is the estimate of:  
 
 It is derived from the weekly BAM samples; each week's sample result is weighted by the number of paid UI weeks in the BAM survey population. The improper payment (IP) rate (expressed as a percentage) is the sum of the Annual Report overpayment rate plus the underpayment rate: IP = OP + UP. Information on the BAM program is available at *http://oui.doleta.gov/​unemploy/​bqc.asp.* *Performance Period:* The performance period would be based on BAM data for the CY. Per the BAM State Operations Handbook (ET Handbook 395, 5th edition), 95 percent of BAM cases must be completed within 90 days after the week ending date of the BAM sampling week (referred to as a batch), and 98 percent of BAM cases for the CY must be completed within 120 days after December 31. The first measurement period would be January 1, 2012, to December 29, 2012 (end date of the last BAM sampling batch in 2012). *Sampling Error:* Because this measure would be based on sample data, the sampling error of the estimated BAM improper payment rate would be taken into account in determining whether a State meets its ALP. All estimates from samples are characterized as a distribution of values around the expected value of the universe. The sampling error is used to measure the variability of that distribution, and it is used to determine the probability that the value calculated from a particular sample drawn from a universe that meets an ALP may be below (or above) the true (universe) value. *Failure to Meet the ALP:* States failing to meet the ALP would be expected to develop a Corrective Action Plan as part of the SQSP. Failures to attain an ALP in the first measurement period would be addressed in the 2014 SQSP (OMB No. 1205-0132, Expiration Date 10/31/2014). *Data Collection Costs:* Because the performance measure would use data collected through the BAM survey, there would be no data collection start-up costs for this performance measure. III. Proposed UI Overpayment Recovery Measure Definition and ALP *Measure Definition:* OMB Issuance of Revised Parts I and II to Appendix C of OMB Circular A-123 [Part 1(B)(3)] defines the recovery rate as “the amount of improper overpayments recovered divided by the amount of improper overpayments identified.” This ratio will be expressed as a percentage. *ALP:* The Department conducted an analysis of the UI recovery data and has established recovery targets of 64 percent in FY 2012 and 72 percent in FY 2013. These targets were reviewed by OMB and published in the Department's AFR, p 125. Attachment B outlines the methodology. The Department will use this methodology to compute future recovery targets based on the most recent recovery and other performance data available. State performance data for the period October 1, 2010, through September 30, 2011, the most recent 12-month reporting period available, are provided in Attachment C. *Calculation:* The measure would be calculated from ETA Overpayment Detection and Recovery reports (ETA 227 and ETA 227 EUC): Total Overpayments Recovered—section C, the sum of line 302, columns 11, 12, 13, 14, 22, and 23.
        Total Overpayments Established Minus Overpayments Waived—section A, the sum of line 101, columns 4, 5, and 21, and line 103, columns 4, 5, and 21, minus section C, the sum of line 308, columns 13, 14, and 23.  *Performance Period:* The performance period would be based on the ETA 227 and ETA 227 EUC data for the CY. Per the Unemployment Insurance Reports Handbook (ET Handbook 401, 4th edition), the December quarter ETA 227 reports are due February 1. The first measurement period would be January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2012. *Sampling Error:* Not applicable; this measure would be based on population data reported on the ETA 227 reports. *Failure to Meet the ALP:* States failing to meet the ALP would be expected to develop a Corrective Action Plan as part of the SQSP. Failures to meet the CY 2012 target will be addressed in the 2014 SQSP (OMB No. 1205-0132, Expiration Date 10/31/2014). *Data Collection Costs:* Because the performance measure would use data collected through the ETA 227 and ETA 227 EUC reports, there would be no data collection start-up costs for this performance measure. Attachment A Unemployment Insurance Integrity Rates
[From: CY 2010 QTR 3]
[To: CY 2011 QTR 2]
ST
Amount paid
IPIA  (OP+UP)  
                 (percent)
Annual report rate  (percent)
Under payment rate  (percent)AK
$187,793,437
13.06
12.01
1.05AL
423,475,745
24.38
24.15
.24AR
404,922,070
12.59
12.43
.16AZ
612,311,633
21.70
21.52
.18CA
7,878,548,634
6.28
5.78
.51CO
759,225,578
16.84
16.13
.71CT
910,540,113
6.62
5.64
.98DC
173,907,643
7.05
6.26
.78DE
130,506,869
11.07
9.35
1.72FL
1,981,338,921
8.36
8.09
.27GA
1,051,141,752
5.36
5.05
.31HI
308,105,469
3.62
3.29
.32( print page 7607)IA
517,702,648
14.37
12.70
1.67ID
244,089,005
9.60
9.52
.08IL
2,614,374,425
14.91
13.49
1.42IN
950,389,758
60.33
59.90
.42KS
460,373,464
3.64
3.61
.02KY
574,241,696
8.42
7.95
.47LA
356,969,426
32.95
31.46
1.49MA
1,808,499,194
5.54
4.20
1.34MD
864,135,379
10.83
10.74
.09ME
198,708,529
17.76
16.97
.78MI
1,608,631,516
11.91
11.40
.51MN
1,040,046,493
10.72
10.25
.47MO
722,648,523
8.26
7.73
.54MS
234,393,333
13.73
13.15
.58MT
155,810,976
11.45
10.41
1.03NC
1,564,424,194
10.66
10.42
.24ND
66,158,178
11.87
11.30
.57NE
161,824,757
16.46
15.94
.52NH
123,301,707
8.07
6.84
1.23NJ
2,770,764,470
12.51
10.86
1.65NM
270,220,624
22.71
21.83
.88NV
642,558,333
9.17
8.77
.40NY
3,760,176,447
7.39
6.99
.40OH
1,491,641,475
20.95
19.42
1.53OK
347,057,290
6.61
6.14
.47OR
884,638,346
12.13
11.80
.32PA
3,329,117,904
11.82
11.24
.58PR
265,690,172
10.06
8.73
1.33RI
289,317,413
6.06
5.65
.41SC
486,351,866
17.94
17.72
.22SD
43,851,969
17.12
16.69
.43TN
539,350,249
17.92
17.77
.15TX
2,548,344,654
12.54
12.00
.54UT
331,290,619
10.99
10.43
.56VA
692,676,373
16.73
16.57
.16VT
131,581,881
5.63
5.25
.38WA
1,509,672,386
15.71
15.52
.19WI
1,154,698,728
12.73
12.37
.36WV
217,742,942
5.52
5.01
.51WY
97,180,931
9.42
8.96
.47**Notes:** 1. Amount paid includes State UI, UCFE, and UCX payments.2. Rates exclude agency errors by States other than the sampling State.*Source:* Benefit Accuracy Measurement.Prepared by: ETA Office of Unemployment Insurance on 18 Jan 12.
 Attachment B Methodology for Establishing Recovery Targets Background As required by the IPERA implementing guidance, ETA has developed UI overpayment recovery targets for FY 2011, FY 2012 and FY 2013. According to Part I(B)(3) of OMB's IPERA guidelines, “Issuance of Revised Parts I and II to Appendix C of OMB Circular A-123” (April 14, 2011): [A]ll agencies are required to establish annual targets for their payment recapture audit programs that will drive their annual performance. The targets shall be based on the rate of recovery (*i.e.,* amount of improper overpayments recovered divided by the amount of improper overpayments identified). Methodology The UI recovery targets involve aggregating overpayments established and recovered under three UI program areas: State UI, permanent Extended Benefits (EB) and the temporary Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC) programs. Recoveries are made using the traditional tools available to States in addition to the Federal Tax Offset Program (TOP), implemented by only three States as of the date of the analysis. The recovery targets reflect separate methodologies for projecting recoveries or recovery rates for (a) State UI plus EB recoveries obtained using traditional tools; (b) recoveries of EUC overpayments made using traditional tools; and (c) recoveries of State UI, EB, and EUC overpayments through TOP. Administration economic assumptions as of the time of the analysis were taken into consideration for all projections. a. *Traditional State UI and EB recoveries.* Recovery estimates for this segment are based on statistical (regression) models that use the historical establishment and recovery data reported on the ETA 227 report to project recoveries for State UI and EB overpayments. The models estimate the relationships between UI overpayments established and recovered for the State UI and EB programs based on several explanatory variables, including the amount of State UI and EB unemployment compensation (UC) program benefit payments, the Total Unemployment Rate (TUR), the overpayment balances available for collection, and the amount of EB program payments as a percentage of total UC benefits paid. The TUR, produced by the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, is used as the primary economic indicator of overall labor market conditions. UI overpayment recovery targets for FY 2011 ( print page 7608)were projected for the full FY based on actual performance data for the first three quarters. Model projections for FY 2012 and FY 2013 were based on the Administration's economic assumptions for the TUR and projections of UI and EB payments based on those assumptions. Estimates for FY 2012 and FY 2013 reflect TOP recoveries to the extent that those recoveries reduce overpayment balances available for collection by standard State recovery techniques, for example, recovery through cash, UI benefit offset, liens, wage garnishment, etc. These models exclude EUC establishments and recoveries because EUC is a temporary program without sufficient historical data. b. *TOP Recoveries.* In 2008, State workforce agencies gained access to TOP to recover UI fraud overpayments that were not more than 10 years old. In December 2010, new legislation expanded TOP access to include nonfraud overpayments resulting from claimants' failures to report earnings and removed the 10-year limit on the debt. During FY 2011, three States—New York, Michigan, and Wisconsin—began participating in TOP, and data on their recoveries are reported by the U. S. Department of the Treasury. Projections of amounts recovered through TOP are based on the rates of TOP recoveries in these three States relative to the uncollected overpayment balance data from the ETA 227 report and fraud overpayments that the States wrote off as uncollectable before they gained access to TOP. At the beginning of FY 2011, States had uncollected fraud overpayment balances of approximately $3.2 billion, of which about $360 million was amounts written off during the past 10 years. Projected national totals for TOP for the country as a whole are based on very preliminary estimates of the rate at which States begin to access TOP. c. *EUC Recoveries.* The recovery targets also take into account overpayment establishments and recoveries contributed by the EUC program. It is assumed that EUC overpayment establishments and recoveries will continue into FY 2013 and that collections through traditional techniques and TOP will be based on the amount of unrecovered EUC overpayments. The rates reflect existing information on amounts established and recovered reported on the ETA 227 EUC report. Existing data show that EUC recovery rates are considerably lower than State UI and EB recovery rates. Targets The following table summarizes the UI overpayment recovery rate targets, rounded down to the nearest integer. The UI recovery rates are constructed by dividing UI overpayment recoveries reported on the ETA 227 UI/EB and EUC reports by overpayments established, minus overpayments waived because they are unrecoverable under State law or policy. The sharp increase in recovery targets for FY 2012 and FY 2013 reflects the expected impact of the TOP program. FY
UI + EB + EUC  including TOP  
                 (Adjusted for 
                 Waivers)2011
45%2012
64%2013
72%
 These targets are based on the following assumptions: The TUR and State UI/EB outlays will not differ significantly from the Administration assumptions in the FY 2012 Budget Midsession Review. The TUR is projected as part of the Administration economic assumptions, and ETA forecasts UI and EB outlays based on the TUR and other economic assumptions. Because amounts of overpayments made, established, and recovered are highly sensitive to economic conditions, any significant change in these economic assumptions will affect the recovery rate estimates of the model.
          Recovery activity for overpayments established for the EUC program is expected to continue into FY 2013 with residual recoveries for overpayments established after the expiration of the EUC program.
          State agencies will begin to participate in TOP according to the adoption path reflected in the model. Based on Treasury information on State plans for adopting TOP and implementation status, the model assumes that by the end of FY 2011 three States will have enrolled in TOP; by the end of FY 2012, 26 States will participate; and by the end of FY 2013 and beyond, 49 States will participate. The implementation model is quarterly because data from the first three States suggest that over 95 percent of recoveries by TOP occur in the first or second calendar quarters, so the calendar quarter during which a State begins to participate in TOP is critical for estimates of first-year recoveries. Changes in the TOP implementation schedule will have a significant impact on recovery rates. It is important to note that these estimates are based on actual counts of UI overpayments identified and recovered by the State agencies and reported on the ETA 227 reports for the FY 1986 to the third quarter of FY 2011 period, not the estimated UI overpayment rates and amounts that are reported in the Department's AFR for the IPIA, which are based on the results of the BAM audits of paid claims samples. Targets are also adjusted to exclude overpayments that are waived as unrecoverable by State agencies, according to the definition in the UI Reports Handbook (ET Handbook 401, 4th edition). Additionally, although these targets were developed using historical FY counts of UI overpayments identified and recovered as reported on the ETA 227, they may be applied to a calendar year measurement cycle. As actual data on recoveries accumulate—driven largely by the rate at which States implement TOP—the out-year targets are likely to be revised. Attachment C State UI Overpayments Established and Recovered
[October 2010-September 2011]
ST
UI + EB + EUC  overpayments  
                 established
UI + EB + EUC  adjusted OPs  
                 established
UI + EB + EUC  overpayments  
                 recovered
Pct. rec.  (percent)AK
$10,786,946
$10,786,946
$4,926,536
45.67AL
43,289,401
43,109,121
10,989,706
25.49AR
15,834,291
15,535,040
3,548,631
22.84AZ
49,972,545
49,153,663
17,927,220
36.47CA
355,671,845
319,473,699
88,802,967
27.80CO
68,391,997
61,271,197
29,375,647
47.94CT
24,034,518
23,869,538
9,940,414
41.64DC
12,220,616
12,202,781
3,673,039
30.10DE
8,965,003
8,935,039
4,552,476
50.95FL
147,623,645
145,775,041
44,571,895
30.58GA
23,231,700
22,569,632
8,087,146
35.83HI
2,770,116
2,357,971
1,435,108
60.86IA
15,843,340
15,754,367
9,341,187
59.29ID
15,065,271
14,128,402
7,303,007
51.69IL
182,087,681
182,087,681
70,338,632
38.63IN
42,788,522
42,788,522
26,348,519
61.58KS
34,676,662
34,144,019
10,576,328
30.98KY
19,160,015
19,160,015
8,310,033
43.37LA
26,509,327
25,299,358
7,617,548
30.11MA
52,507,008
49,520,685
19,786,563
39.96( print page 7609)MD
74,634,081
73,857,637
24,762,560
33.53ME
11,251,820
10,473,860
4,290,528
40.96MI
159,904,300
154,893,349
46,695,875
30.15MN
78,107,121
78,107,121
34,172,193
43.75MO
43,124,208
43,124,208
17,194,165
39.87MS
24,647,373
24,647,373
10,327,401
41.90MT
8,315,543
8,243,443
3,282,896
39.82NC
29,499,484
26,206,623
13,432,770
51.26ND
2,829,616
2,819,461
1,590,573
56.41NE
9,203,878
9,203,878
6,117,042
66.46NH
8,765,741
6,758,020
2,106,741
31.17NJ
217,078,665
216,569,050
173,289,168
80.02NM
26,144,403
26,144,403
7,695,583
29.43NV
79,263,713
75,184,087
11,304,039
15.04NY
173,450,225
136,332,802
119,837,684
87.90OH
110,977,907
110,839,890
40,467,585
36.51OK
13,589,431
13,589,431
6,334,034
46.61OR
52,034,282
43,226,825
15,972,461
36.95PA
179,666,995
178,969,168
71,342,580
39.86PR
9,015,270
9,015,270
4,352,634
48.28RI
12,555,567
11,690,902
4,753,249
40.66SC
42,786,170
42,315,788
18,882,525
44.62SD
2,598,766
2,511,814
1,280,515
50.98TN
26,502,776
25,426,645
9,965,361
39.19TX
200,713,633
193,763,711
83,402,654
43.04UT
24,886,880
24,659,843
11,568,309
46.91VA
37,941,504
37,941,504
15,385,906
40.55VT
3,181,382
2,097,223
917,377
43.74WA
144,933,042
137,873,967
71,128,301
51.59WI
81,590,555
78,734,237
53,254,357
67.64WV
8,231,348
8,231,348
3,020,124
36.69WY
6,047,490
5,741,420
2,155,330
37.54**Notes:** 1. UI includes State UI, UCFE, and UCX overpayments.2. Overpayments established exclude overpayments waived.*Source:* ETA 227 and ETA 227 EUC Reports.Prepared by Div. of Performance Management on: 18 Jan 12.
 Signed in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of February, 2012. Jane Oates, Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training.


[FR Doc. 2012-3252 Filed 2-10-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P