alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0888 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-CE-024-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
2 

ONaiff 111-jr, '1,71=' 

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to 

do so here, see Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 

(1987). Gendron's sentence of 24 to 60 months in prison is within the 

statutory limits, see NRS 205.222(2), and she does not allege that the 

district court relied solely on "impalpable and highly suspect evidence," 

Denson v. State, 112 Nev. 489, 492, 915 P.2d 284, 286 (1996). 

Having considered Gendron's contentions and concluded that 

they are without merit, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Gibbons 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge 

Washoe County Alternate Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A
#### Joseph Cappello, Appellant, v Rosarie Cappello, Respondent.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Liebowitz, J.), dated June 5, 1989, which, *inter alia,*(1) directed that he pay nondurational maintenance to the defendant wife in the amount of $150 per week, (2) awarded a 25% *480interest in the marital residence to him and a 75% interest therein to the defendant wife and gave the defendant wife the option to purchase the plaintiff husband’s share of the marital residence at its stipulated market value, and (3) directed that certain pension annuity and deferred compensation plans owned by the plaintiff husband be distributed equally between the parties.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The court properly considered the issue of maintenance de novo since the prior judgment of separation between the parties was not conclusive with respect to fixation of maintenance in the divorce action *(see, Kover v Kover,*29 NY2d 408, 414). The award of maintenance in the divorce action was made with due regard for the enumerated statutory factors *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [a]), and the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding nondurational maintenance *(see, Petrie v Petrie,*124 AD2d 449; *Kerlinger v Kerlinger,*121 AD2d 691; *Foy v Foy,*121 AD2d 501). Moreover, the trial court, by giving due regard to the enumerated statutory factors *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [d]), achieved a fair and equitable distribution of the marital property which was supported by the evidence and based upon sound reasoning *(see, Arvantides v Arvantides,*64 NY2d 1033; *Ierardi v Ierardi,*151 AD2d 548). Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
#### Continental Casualty Company, Plaintiff, *v.*Milford Construction Corporation et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

October 21, 1958.

*Jacob I. Goodstein*for George Negri, Inc., defendant.

*Andrew Echel*for plaintiff.

*Arthur H. Christy, United States Attorney,*for United States of America, defendant.

Henry Olay Greenberg, J.

Defendant George Negri, Inc. moves for dismissal of the complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice or, alternatively, for relief pursuant to rule 90. The action is brought by a surety upon bonds furnished pursuant to two contracts for public improvements. -While the movant is not precluded from instituting appropriate suit against the surety secondarily liable (see *Negri, Inc.*v. *Milford Constr. Corp.,*15 Misc 2d 1029) it is, nevertheless, bound by plaintiff’s right of exoneration whereby all claimants will receive their due in accordance with the paramount right of the city and of the surety to apply the moneys earned and the retained percentages to the satisfaction of all bonded claims. The statement of one cause upon two such contracts in the circumstances here is not prejudicial to the defendant.

The motion is denied.
IIA 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 33 

Relating to the approval of the proposed Third Amendment to the Agreement 

for Co-operation Between the United States of America and the International Atomic Energy Agency. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2014 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself and Mr. CORKER) (by request) introduced the 

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the approval of the proposed Third Amendment 

to the Agreement for Co-operation Between the United 

States of America and the International Atomic Energy 

Agency. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Congress does favor the proposed agreement for 

4 cooperation transmitted to the Congress by the President 

5 on January 29, 2014. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 9674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; ZHD1 DSR-L 54 2, ``Male 
Reproduction.''
    Date: March 14, 2012.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Dennis E. Leszczynski, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child 
Health, and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-2717, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e525b4d445d475a7e535f57521050575610595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fd91988e879e8499bd909c9491d3939495d39a928b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 13, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-3807 Filed 2-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

 

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Coast Oil Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|                        | The Bank of New York Mellon Trust   Company, |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                        | N.A., Trustee for Pacific Coast   Oil Trust  |
|                        |                                         |
| Date: November 7, 2016 | By:                                          | /s/ SARAH NEWELL |
|                        |                                         | Sarah Newell |
| * *                    | * *                                     | *Vice   President and Trust Officer* |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL  FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



Francine Lavoie, President and Chief Executive Officer of Boreal
Water Collection, Inc. (the “Registrant”) certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



| | Date: | April 15, 2013
| | ----- | --------------

| | By: | /s/ Francine Lavoie
| | --- | -------------------

| | Name: | Francine Lavoie
| | ----- | ---------------

| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| | ------ | -----------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.61 MB)

Tags:Loglines, STOWW

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1209 CA 11-00918 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF MARK C. POLONCARZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COMPTROLLER OF ERIE COUNTY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

CHRISTOPHER C. COLLINS, COUNTY EXECUTIVE OF ERIE COUNTY, ERIE COUNTY LEGISLATURE, DANIEL M. KOZUB, TIMOTHY M. KENNEDY, BARBARA MILLER-WILLIAMS, RAYMOND W. WALTER, DINO J. FUDOLI, MARIA R. WHYTE, BETTY JEAN GRANT, THOMAS J. MAZUR, CHRISTINA W. BOVE, KEVIN R. HARDWICK, LYNN M. MARINELLI, LYNNE M. DIXON, JOHN J. MILLS, THOMAS A. LOUGHRAN AND EDWARD A. RATH, III, AS DULY ELECTED LEGISLATORS CONSTITUTING THE ERIE COUNTY LEGISLATURE, GREGORY G. GACH, ERIE COUNTY DIRECTOR OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT, AND COUNTY OF ERIE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

JEROME D. SCHAD, WILLIAMSVILLE, FOR PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (A. VINCENT BUZARD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS CHRISTOPHER C. COLLINS, COUNTY EXECUTIVE OF ERIE COUNTY, GREGORY G. GACH, ERIE COUNTY DIRECTOR OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT, AND COUNTY OF ERIE.

BENNETT, DIFILIPPO & KURTHALTS, LLP, HOLLAND (RONALD P. BENNETT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS JOHN J. MILLS, RAYMOND W. WALTER, DINO J. FUDOLI, KEVIN R. HARDWICK, LYNNE M. DIXON AND EDWARD A. RATH, III.

LAW OFFICE OF SHAWN P. MARTIN, WEST SENECA (SHAWN P. MARTIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS ERIE COUNTYLEGISLATURE, DANIEL M. KOZUB, TIMOTHY M. KENNEDY, BARBARA MILLERWILLIAMS, MARIA R. WHYTE, BETTY JEAN GRANT, THOMAS J. MAZUR, CHRISTINA W. BOVE, LYNN M. MARINELLI AND THOMAS A. LOUGHRAN.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Gerald J. Whalen, J.), dated November 19, 2010 in a declaratory judgment action/CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment dismissed the complaint/petition (denominated petition).

Now upon reading and filing the stipulations of discontinuance of-2- 1209 CA 11-00918
appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on December 21, 2011 and January 23, 2012,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: June 8, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 401 

Recognizing Easy Company, 2nd Battalion of the 506th Parachute Infantry 

Regiment of the 101st Airborne Division. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2014 

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself and Mr. CASEY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Easy Company, 2nd Battalion of the 506th 

Parachute Infantry Regiment of the 101st Airborne Division. 

Whereas Easy Company, 2nd Battalion comprised part of the 

506th Parachute Infantry Regiment of the 101st Airborne Division of the United States Army; 

Whereas Easy Company was immortalized by the heroic actions of its soldiers during World War II; 

Whereas the book and miniseries, ‘‘Band of Brothers’’, introduces a new generation of people of the United States to 

the valorous deeds of Easy Company; 

Whereas Easy Company engaged in critical combat missions 

during World War II, including the Battle of Normandy, 

Operation Market Garden, the Battle of Bastogne, and 

the Allied capture of Hitler’s Eagles Nest; 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 401 IS 

Whereas Easy Company was originally comprised of 140 soldiers, 12 of whom were natives of the State of Pennsylvania; 

Whereas the Pennsylvania heroes who helped to form Easy 

Company were Richard D. ‘‘Dick’’ Winters, Thomas Meehan III, Harry F. Welsh, Jack Edward Foley, Joseph D. 

Toye, William J. Guarnere, Forrest L. Guth, Edward 

James Heffron, Albert Blithe, Carl L. Fenstermaker, 

Roderick G. Strohl, and Joseph A. Lesniewski; 

Whereas Easy Company lost 49 soldiers, including Thomas 

Meehan III, who paid the ultimate price for freedom during World War II; and 

Whereas with the passing of William J. Guarnere, also known 

as ‘‘Wild Bill’’, on March 8, 2014, all of the Pennsylvania natives who served in Easy Company, except for 

Roderick G. Strohl, have passed away: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes— 

2 (1) the impact of Easy Company and the brav3 ery of all of the heroes who have served in the com4 pany; and 

5 (2) the brave Pennsylvania natives who served 

6 in Easy Company. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.53 MB)

Tags:DLA Land and Maritime

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 19-2915

___________________________ 

Anthony Lamar Hayes

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Mitchell Johnson, Jr., Captain, Hawkins Unit for Women; Michael M. Lowe, 

Major, Wrightsville Unit; Terrie L. Banister, Disciplinary Hearing Judge, ADC; 

Itena Jackson, SATP Counselor, Wrightsville Unit; Claudia Harris, Deputy 

Warden, Wrightsville Unit; Randy Watson, Warden, Wrightsville Unit; Dexter 

Payne, Deputy Director, ADC

 Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________ 

Submitted: October 27, 2020

 Filed: November 3, 2020 

[Unpublished]

____________ 

Before BENTON, WOLLMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
- 2 -

Anthony Lamar Hayes, an inmate in the Arkansas Department of Correction, 

appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro 

se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court 

affirms. 

After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, this 

court concludes that the district court properly granted summary judgment. See 

Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (grant of summary judgment is 

reviewed de novo; record is viewed in light most favorable to nonmoving party). 

This court clarifies, however, that to the extent Hayes raised retaliation claims 

against defendants Claudia Harris and Itena Jackson, the dismissal of those claims 

is without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (appellate court may modify any 

judgment brought before it for review).

The judgment is affirmed as modified. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1

The Honorable D.P. Marshall, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the 

Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of 

Arkansas.