Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 2012 / Notices 10773 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

2The Commission has found the responses 

submitted by Core Pipe Products, Inc.; Ezeflow USA 

Inc.-Flowline Division; Shaw Alloy Piping 

Products, Inc.; Taylor Forge Stainless, Inc.; and by 

Filmag Italia, srl to be individually adequate. 

Comments from other interested parties will not be 

accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on January 3, 2011 (76 FR 166) 

and determined on April 8, 2011 that it 

would conduct full reviews (76 FR 

22422, April 21, 2011). Notice of the 

scheduling of the Commission’s reviews 

and of a public hearing to be held in 

connection therewith was given by 

posting copies of the notice in the Office 

of the Secretary, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, Washington, DC, 

and by publishing the notice in the 

Federal Register on July 1, 2011 (76 FR 

38698). The hearing was held in 

Washington, DC, on November 30, 2011, 

and all persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to appear in 

person or by counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determination in these reviews to the 

Secretary of Commerce on February 16, 

2011. The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 4303 

(February 2012), entitled Fresh and 

Chilled Atlantic Salmon from Norway: 

Investigation Nos. 701–TA–302 and 

731–TA–454 (Third Review). 

Issued: February 17, 2012. 

By order of the Commission. 

James R. Holbein, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2012–4199 Filed 2–22–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–865–867 

(Second Review)] 

Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings 

From Italy, Malaysia, and the 

Philippines; Scheduling of Expedited 

Five-Year Reviews 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of expedited 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine 

whether revocation of the antidumping 

duty orders on stainless steel butt-weld 

pipe fittings from Italy, Malaysia, and 

the Philippines would be likely to lead 

to continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. For further information 

concerning the conduct of these reviews 

and rules of general application, consult 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

DATES: Effective Date: February 6, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Barbara Elkins (202–205–2253), Office 

of Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On February 6, 2012, 

the Commission determined that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (76 

FR 67473, November 1, 2011) of the 

subject five-year reviews was adequate 

and that the respondent interested party 

group response was inadequate. The 

Commission did not find any other 

circumstances that would warrant 

conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly, 

the Commission determined that it 

would conduct expedited reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. 

Staff report.—A staff report 

containing information concerning the 

subject matter of these reviews will be 

placed in the nonpublic record on 

March 12, 2012 and made available to 

persons on the Administrative 

Protective Order service list for these 

reviews. A public version will be issued 

thereafter, pursuant to section 

207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions.—As provided in 

section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s 

rules, interested parties that are parties 

to the reviews and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,2 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

reviews may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determination the 

Commission should reach in the 

reviews. Comments are due on or before 

March 15, 2012 and may not contain 

new factual information. Any person 

that is neither a party to the five-year 

reviews nor an interested party may 

submit a brief written statement (which 

shall not contain any new factual 

information) pertinent to the reviews by 

March 15, 2012. However, should the 

Department of Commerce extend the 

time limit for its completion of the final 

results of its reviews, the deadline for 

comments (which may not contain new 

factual information) on Commerce’s 

final results is three business days after 

the issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of sections 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. Please be aware that the 

Commission’s rules with respect to 

electronic filing have been amended. 

The amendments took effect on 

November 7, 2011. See 76 FR 61937 

(Oct. 6, 2011) and the newly revised 

Commission’s Handbook on E–Filing, 

available on the Commission’s Web site 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

Also, in accordance with sections 

201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s 

rules, each document filed by a party to 

the review must be served on all other 

parties to the review (as identified by 

either the public or APO service list as 

appropriate), and a certificate of service 

must accompany the document (if you 

are not a party to the review you do not 

need to serve your response). The 

Secretary will not accept a document for 

filing without a certificate of service. 

Determination.—The Commission has 

determined to exercise its authority to 

extend the review period by up to 90 

days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 17, 2012. 

James R. Holbein, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2012–4196 Filed 2–22–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES