alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 1956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-358]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


National Science Board; Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment 
on the National Science Board Data Policies Report

AGENCY: National Science Board (NSB), NSF.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Board seeks comments from the public on 
the report from the Committee on Strategy and Budget's Task Force on 
Data Policies, Digital Research Data Sharing and Management.

DATES: Send comments by email to Blane Dahl at the National Science 
Board Office at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c4a6a0a5aca884aab7a2eaa3abb2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f69492979e9ab6988590d8919980">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments are due by close of business 
Wednesday, January 18, 2012.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Recognizing that the proliferation of 
digital research data has significant policy implications, the National 
Science Board Committee on Strategy and Budget established the Task 
Force on Data Policies to lead a broad examination on how research data 
collected with NSF funding are shared and managed to ensure broad, 
timely, and long-term availability to the research community. The 
recommendations in the resulting Data Policies Report reflect the 
Board's firm commitment to ensuring broad, timely, and sustained access 
to digital research data; addressing the cost burdens associated with 
managing digital research data; and developing a qualified workforce in 
data-enabled science and engineering.
    The full Report is available at http:[sol][sol]www.nsf.gov/nsb/
news/news_summ.jsp?cntn--id=122702&org=NSB&from=news. Comments should 
be germane to the subject matter of the Report.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about this 
notice, please contact the National Science Board Office, telephone: 
(202) 292-7000.

    Dated: January 6, 2012.
Ann Bushmiller,
Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-358 Filed 1-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Bryan A. Shinn, Chief Executive Officer, U.S. Silica
Holdings, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | i. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 2, 2012



/s/ BRYAN A. SHINNName:

Bryan A. ShinnTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


A signed copy of this original statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Dawn Ursin, Individually and on behalf of JaCardo Hawkins

, Deceased v. Brand safway LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00651

- CV

Trial court case number: 2020

- 21353

Trial court: 295th District Court of Harris County

Appellant is appealing from the trial court’s August 9, 2022 order granting appellee’s

traditional and no

- evidence motion s for summary judgment. On September 12, 2022, the court reporter advi sed this Court that there was a reporter’s record

, but that appellant had not requested preparation and filing of the reporter’s record. On October 12, 2022, this Court sent a notice to appellant concerning the failure to request or make financial arrange ments for the filing of the reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(a).

Because the reporter’s record ha s not yet been filed, appellant’s brief is not yet due. But on December 15, 2022, appellant tendered a brief which was received only. The brief received on December 15, 2022 is not in compliance with the briefing requirements set out in the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because it lacks citations to the record , or inadequate citations to the record,

in the statement of facts and argument sec tions of the brief . There are some citations to depositions , but these citations do not cite to the pages in the record where these depositions may

be found. S ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1( g ), (i). W e strike the brief and order appellant to correct the

above

- described deficiencies.

If appellant intends to file a brief without the benefit of a reporter’s record, appellant shall advise the Court that no reporter’s record will be requested and must raise in the brief only those

i ssues that do not require the reporter’s record for decision.

The reporter’s record, if appellant intends to file one, shall be filed within 30 days of the

date of this order . If a reporter’s record is filed, appellant’s amended brief is due 30 days aft er the reporter’s record is filed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). If appellant does not intend to file a reporter’s record, appellant shall file its amended brief, noting that no reporter’s record will be

filed within 30 days of the date of this order

.
It is so ORDERED.Judge’s signature:

____ /s/ Richard Hightower

_________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ January 3, 2023

_____
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.49 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, DLA Aviation - Cherry Point, Always Accountable, Employee Spotlight

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
*Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 _____________________

No. 94-60743

Summary Calendar

 _____________________

ROBERTO LUGO,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE

CITY OF DONNA, HIDALGO COUNTY,

TEXAS, ET AL.,

Defendants,

ARACELIA REYES, Individuially,

Etc., ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellants.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Texas

(M-93-CV-260)

_______________________________________________________

(September 28, 1995)

Before REAVLEY, SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff Roberto Lugo brought various state claims and

three claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the commissioners of

the Donna Housing Authority. The commissioners moved under Fed.
2

R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the § 1983 claims on qualified

immunity grounds, arguing that Lugo's complaint did not meet the

heightened pleading standards applicable to § 1983 actions under

Elliott v. Perez, 751 F.2d 1472 (5th Cir. 1985). The

commissioners now appeal the denial of their 12(b)(6) motion.

Between the time the district court denied the motion to

dismiss and the consideration of this appeal, the Fifth Circuit

changed the pleading procedure for cases in which qualified

immunity is asserted as a defense. Schultea v. Wood, 47 F.3d

1427 (5th Cir. 1995) (en banc). Under Schultea, plaintiffs need

no longer anticipate a qualified immunity defense in the

complaint. Id. at 1430. If the complaint states a claim under

normal pleading standards, the defendant must raise his qualified

immunity defense in an answer, and if he does so, the district

court may, in its discretion, insist that plaintiff file a reply

tailored specifically to the issue of qualified immunity. Id. at

1433-34. After receiving the reply, the court can determine

whether the case can proceed and consider any motions for summary

judgment. Id. In light of Schultea, and because denial of a

motion to dismiss is not appealable, this appeal is dismissed.

DISMISSED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

** PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

I, Mark Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President, in connection with the Quarterly Reportof CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     The QuarterlyReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:November 10, 2016

 

|   |                                                                                                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Mark Gatto

Mark  Gatto  Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President

*(Principal Executive Officer)* |
|   | CĪON  Investment Corporation                                                                         |

 

 

----
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 7 February 2006         

implementing Council Directive 94/28/EC as regards a list of authorities in third countries approved for the keeping of a herdbook or register of certain animals

(notified under document number C(2006) 284)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/139/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 94/28/EC of 23 June 1994 laying down the principles relating to the zootechnical and genealogical conditions applicable to imports from third countries of animals, their semen, ova and embryos, and amending Directive 77/504/EEC on pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species (1), and in particular Article 3(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the purposes of Directive 94/28/EC the list of authorities which are approved for the keeping of a herd book or register in respect of breeding animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine and caprine species, their semen, ova and embryos as ‘pure-bred’ — or, in the case of porcine species also as ‘hybrid,’— is set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

Member States shall authorise the importation of breeding animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine and caprine species, their semen, ova and embryos as ‘pure-bred’ — or, in the case of porcine species also as ‘hybrid,’ — only if they are entered or registered in a herdbook or register kept by an authority listed in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 February 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 12.7.1994, p. 66.

----

ANNEX

I.   Country: Argentina

Species: bovine, caprine, ovine, porcine

II.   Country: Bulgaria (1)

Species: bovine, caprine, ovine, porcine

III.   Country: Canada

Species: bovine

Species: caprine

Species: ovine

Species: porcine

IV.   Country: Iceland

Species: bovine, caprine, ovine, porcine

V.   Country: Israel

Species: bovine

SION

SION Israel Company for Artificial Insemination and Breeding ltd.

VI.   Country: New Zealand

Species: bovine

VII.   United States of America

Species: bovine

Species: caprine

Species: ovine

Species: porcine

----

(1)  Applicable only until this acceding state becomes a Member State.

----
#### Edward A. RICHE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NORTH OGDEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, a Utah professional corporation, Defendant and Petitioner.

No. 880443.

Supreme Court of Utah.

June 23, 1989.

Pete N. Vlahos and F. Kim Walpole, Ogden, for plaintiff and respondent.

John P. Sampson, Ogden, for defendant and petitioner.

ON CERTIORARI TO THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM:

Having reviewed the briefs on appeal, this Court affirms the Court of Appeals for the reasons set forth in its opinion.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.71 MB)

Tags:UVA, Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, University of Virginia, Defense Logistics Agency, Information Operations, information security project, Strong partnership, Hacking for Defense, Prime Vendor

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
1 

### Request for Approval under the “ GENERIC CLEARANCE FO R QUALITATIVE

CONSUMER EDUCATION, ENGAGEMENT, AND EXPE RIENCE INFORMATION

COLLECTIONS 

### ” (OMB Control N umber: 3170

- XXXX )

TITLE OF INFORMATION COLLECTION:

PURPOSE:

DESCRIPTION OF RESPONDENTS :

TYPE OF COLLECTION: (Check all that apply)

[ ] In

- Person Meeting [ ] Qualitative Survey

[ ] Interview [ ] Small Discussion Group

[ ] Focus Group [ ] Online Discussion Forum

[ ] Social Media Poll [ ] Other:

______________________

CERTIFICATION:

By submitting this document, the Bureau certifies the following to be true:

1. The collection is voluntary.

2. The collection is low

- burden for respondents

. 3. The collection is non

- controversial and does not raise issues of concern to other federal

agencies.2 Personally Identifiable Information:

1. Is personally identifiable information (PII) collected ? [ ] Yes [ ] No

2. If Yes, is the information that will be collected included in records that are subject to the

Privacy Act of 1974? [ ] Yes [ ] No

3. If Applicable, has a System or Records Notice been published? [ ] Yes [ ] No

Gifts or Payments :

Is an incentive (e.g., money or reimbursement of expenses, token of appreciation) provided to

participants? [ ] Yes [ ] No

Assurances of Confidentiality:

1. Will a pledge of confidentiality be made to respondents? [ ] Yes [ ] No

2. If Yes, please cite the statue, regulation, or contractual terms supporting the pledge.

JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS (if applicable):

BURDEN HOUR S

Category of Respondent N umber of

Respondents Participation

Time Burden

Totals

FEDERAL COST : The estimated annual cost to the Federal government is ____________3 Strategies for Selecting Respondents

Do you have a customer list or something similar that defines the universe of potential

respondents and do you have a sampling plan for selecting from this universe ?

[ ] Yes

[ ] No

If the answer is yes, please provide a description of both below (or attach the sampling plan) ? If

the answer is no, please provide a description of how you plan to identify your potential group of

respondents and ho w you will select them ?

Information Collection Procedures

Please summarize the procedures that will be used to collect data from respondents.

Administration of the Instrument

1. H ow will you collect the information? (Check all that apply)

[ ] Web

- based or other forms of Social Media

[ ] Telephone

[ ] In

- person

[ ] Mail

[ ] Other, Explain

2. Will interviewers or facilitators be used? [ ] Yes [ ] No

Please make sure that all instruments, instructions, and scripts are submitted with the

request.
EXHIBIT 21
 COGNEX CORPORATION
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
  NAME OF
    
    STATE/COUNTRY OF
    
    PERCENTSUBSIDIARY
    
    INCORPORATION
    
    OWNERSHIPCognex Technology and Investment
Corporation
    
    California
    
    
    100
    %Cognex Canada Technology, Inc.
    
    California
    
    
    100
    %Cognex Foreign Sales Corporation
    
    Barbados
    
    
    100
    %Cognex Distribution Corporation
    
    Georgia
    
    
    100
    %AssistWare Technology, Inc.
    
    Pennsylvania
    
    
    100
    %Vision Drive, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Vision Drive Retail LLC
    
    Massachusetts
    
    
    100
    %Cognex Canada, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Cognex K.K.
    
    Japan
    
    
    100
    %Cognex International, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Cognex Europe, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Cognex Europe, b.v.
    
    Netherlands
    
    
    100
    %Cognex, Ltd.
    
    Ireland
    
    
    100
    %Cognex Germany, Inc.
    
    Massachusetts
    
    
    100
    %Cognex UK Ltd.
    
    United Kingdom
    
    
    100
    %Cognex Finland Oy
    
    Finland
    
    
    100
    %Cognex Singapore, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Cognex Korea, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Cognex Taiwan, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Cognex Asia, Inc.(formerly Cognex China,
Inc.)
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Cognex Sensors India Private Limited
    
    India
    
    
    100
    %Cognex Hungary Kft.
    
    Hungary
    
    
    100
    %
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 23, 2009

d0615 

# Order

June 23, 2009

138319

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138319 COA: 280434 Saginaw CC: 04-025108-FC OLATUNJI KEAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 5, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.