alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 3 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 3

            Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 3, 2013

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the daily meeting of the Senate be 12 o'clock 
meridian unless otherwise ordered.
                                 <all>
```
[ DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-10289

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cv-02584-VMC,

Bkcy No. 8:10-bk-14527-CPM

In Re: JAMES V. UTTERMOHLEN,

Debtor.

___________________________________________________

TRACI K. STEVENSON,

Plaintiff- Appellant,

versus

JAMES V. UTTERMOHLEN,

Defendant -Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(August 9, 2013)

Before BARKETT, MARCUS, and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Case: 13-10289 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 1 of 3 
2

PER CURIAM:

This appeal involves debtor James V. Uttermohlen=s (Uttermohlen) filing 

under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code in 2010, seeking to discharge 

approximately $40,000.00, in unsecured, non-priority liabilities.1

 On his Schedule 

C, Uttermohlen filed a Schedule C exempt asset claim to a A2010 Tax Refund,@ in 

an amount to be determined, under Florida law. Uttermohlen later amended his 

Schedule C to claim that the amount was $10,668.00, and by definition was 

exempt as tenancy-by-the-entireties property under 11 U.S.C. ' 522(b)(3)(B), as 

well as Florida law.

Bankruptcy trustee Traci K. Stevenson (Trustee) objected on three grounds: 

(1) that the refunded tax contributions solely related to Uttermohlen=s income, 

business income, and losses; (2) that the non-filing spouse does not work outside 

the home; and, (3) that the 2010 Tax Refund is not tenancy-by-the-entireties 

property and should be apportioned according to each spouse’s= income 

contribution.

 1 There was a jurisdictional issue in this appeal that was carried with the case. Upon 

review, we find that the order of the district court, affirming the bankruptcy court order 

overruling the Trustee=s objection to an exemption claimed under 11 U.S.C. ' 522(b)(3)(B), is a 

final and appealable order. See Wisz v. Moister (in the Matter of Wisz), 778 F.2d 762, 764 (11th 

Cir. 1985); Growth Realty Cos. v. Regency Woods Apts. (In re Regency Woods Apts.), 686 F.2d 

899, 902 (11th Cir. 1982). 

Case: 13-10289 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 2 of 3 
3

After two hearings, the bankruptcy court overruled the Trustee=s Objection 

to Debtor=s Claim of Exemptions in 2011. The bankruptcy court found that all 

unities required to own property as tenants-by-the-entireties existed on the date that 

Uttermohlen filed bankruptcy, and that therefore the tax refund was properly 

claimed as exempt property.

The Trustee appealed to the district court. In a well-reasoned, thorough 

opinion, the district court affirmed the ruling of the bankruptcy court. We have 

reviewed the record in this appeal, the briefs, and the arguments of counsel. 

Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-10289 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLNML00000 L12200000.DF0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Las Cruces District Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet as indicated below.

# DATES:

The meeting date is January 25, 2012, at the BLM Las Cruces District Office, 1800 Marquess Street, Las Cruces, NM 88005, from 10 a.m.-4 p.m.

The public may send written comments to the RAC at the above address.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rena Gutierrez, BLM Las Cruces District, 1800 Marquess Street, Las Cruces, NM 88005, (575) 525-4338. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-(800) 877-8229 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The 10-member RAC advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in New Mexico.

Planned agenda items include opening remarks from the District Manager, recreation fees, renewable energy projects, access issues, and future project work for the RAC. A half-hour public comment period during which the public may address the Council will begin at 2:30 p.m. on January 25, 2012. All RAC meetings are open to the public. Depending on the number of individuals wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited.

Bill Childress,

District Manager, Las Cruces.

[FR Doc. 2012-370 Filed 1-10-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-VC-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.72 MB)

Tags:Loglines, November 2018, DLA Workforce Recruitment Program

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128668 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan REYNALDO C. VARGAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128668 COA: 259645 WCAC: 03-000370 KAYDON CORPORATIO N and TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 6, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN.

If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. 

Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA.

A	d v s on	of	the	Amer can	Chem ca 	Soc ety	 Phone:	800-631-1884,	614-447-3870

Fax:	614-447-3747

E-ma : answers@cas.org

Web: www.cas.org/products/other-cas-products/c ent-serv ces/

InventoryExpertService

CAS					•					2540	Olentangy	River	Road					•					P.O.	Box	3343					•					Columbus,	OH		43210-0334					•					USA
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; RFA DE12-004 & 005 Functional Restoration of Salivary Glands.                    

*Date:*                         March 8, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Garden Inn, 7301 Waverly St., Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Marilyn Moore-Hoon, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial, Research, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Rm. 676, Bethesda, MD 20892-4878, 301-594-4861,                         *mooremar@nidcr.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 14, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-4098 Filed 2-21-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a briefing and planning meeting of the Maine Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 9 a.m. (EST) on Monday, April 2, 2012. The meetings will be held at the Wishcamper Auditorium, University of Southern Maine, 34 Bedford Street, Portland, ME 04101. The purpose of the briefing meeting is to gather information from law enforcement, government officials, human service providers, advocates and community members on the issue of human trafficking in Maine. The purpose of the planning meeting is to plan future activities.

                    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The comments must be received in the regional office by Wednesday, May 2, 2012. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 9th Street NW., Suite 740, Washington, DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to                     *ero@usccr.gov.*

Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Eastern Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

                    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site,                     *www.usccr.gov,*                     or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above email or street address.                

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Dated in Washington, DC, February 16, 2012.

Peter Minarik,

Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 2012-4152 Filed 2-22-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7405

NICHOLAS ROBERTO-IARA BAKER,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, 

District Judge. (2:15-cv-00066-AWA-DEM)

Submitted: January 21, 2016 Decided: February 5, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nicholas Roberto-Iara Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Leah A. Darron, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Nicholas Roberto-Iara Baker seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Baker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny 

Baker’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 
3

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Shengkai Innovations, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Wang Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




Date:
      February 10, 2010/s/Wang ChenWang
      ChenChief
      Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer, principal financial
                officer,
      and principal accounting officer
)
Exhibit 32.1





Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





RE:  Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)





Ladies and Gentlemen:





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SandRidge Mississippian Trust II (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.














/s/ Sarah NewellSarah NewellVice PresidentThe Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,as Trustee of SandRidge Mississippian Trust IIMay 9, 2019
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ALFONZO EXUM,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 75 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Order entered July 30, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00543-CV

IN RE DELORIS PHILLIPS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-00541

ORDER

Before the Court is relator’s July 21, 2018 “Request for Preservation of Any/All 

Records/Files/Documents, Etc.” We DENY AS MOOT the request for preservation because all 

records and documents filed in this original proceeding will be retained in accordance with 

applicable statutes and the Court’s record retention policy. 

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

JUSTICE