alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Certificationof Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Garcia Hanson, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of Authoriszor, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.  I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
|                 |   |                                   |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
| Date:  March 1, 2005 |   | /S/  GARCIA HANSON                     |   |
|                 |   |                                   |
|                 |   | Garcia  Hanson                         |
|                 |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 9928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3893]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 16, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Clifford Stanford, Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. First Volunteer Corporation, Chattanooga, Tennessee, to merge 
with Gateway Bancshares, Inc. and thereby acquire Gateway Bank & Trust, 
both of Ringgold, Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 15, 
2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-3893 Filed 2-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
From: Jordan, Ronald

To: Schroeder, Cuc; Flanders, Phillip; Yan Zhuang; Thomas Finseth; Dan-Tam Nguyen

Subject: FW: EPA questions for upcoming call with We Energies (P4 data)

Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 2:40:45 PM

Attachments: 2014-06-11 Answers to EPA_s Questions about P4 Data for ELG Rulemaking.PDF

From: Castronovo.Alison [mailto:Alison.Castronovo@we-energies.com]

Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 2:32 PM

To: Jordan, Ronald

Subject: RE: EPA questions for upcoming call with We Energies (P4 data)

Ron,

Attached is the written response from We Energies relaying the answers to EPA’s questions about

P4 data.

If you have any other questions or require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact

Dave Lee or me.

Alison Castronovo

Environmental Engineer

We Energies

333 W. Everett Street, A231

Milwaukee, WI 53203

Office: (414) 221-4337

From: Jordan, Ronald [mailto:Jordan.Ronald@epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:36 AM

To: Lee.David; Thomas Finseth; Dan-Tam Nguyen; Yan Zhuang; Schroeder, Cuc; Flanders, Phillip

Subject: EPA questions for upcoming call with We Energies (P4 data)
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 430/2006

of 15 March 2006         

approving operations to check conformity with the marketing standards applicable to fresh fruit and vegetables carried out in Senegal prior to import into the Community

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Checks on conformity with the marketing standards applicable to fresh fruit and vegetables carried out by Senegal prior to import into the Community are hereby approved in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1148/2001.

Article 2

Details of the official authority and inspection body in Senegal, as referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1148/2001, are given in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from the date of publication in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union of the notice referred to in Article 7(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1148/2001, relating to the establishment of administrative cooperation between the Community and Senegal.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 March 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64).

(2)OJ L 156, 13.6.2001, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 408/2003 (OJ L 62, 6.3.2003, p. 8).

----

ANNEX

Official authority referred to in Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1148/2001:

Inspection body referred to in Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1148/2001:

----
Appendix 1 : UAVs used for Operations

Manufacturer Make/Models:

Representative Images:

3DR Hexa (X) 3DR Y6

DJI Phantom 3 Pro Cinestar 8

Tarot 680 Flitetest Electrohub
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 9230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3636]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 14180-000; 14193-000]


Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLV; FFP Project 2, LLC; Notice 
Announcing Preliminary Permit Drawing

    The Commission has received two preliminary permit applications 
deemed filed on May 3, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.,\1\ for proposed projects to 
be located on the Arkansas River, in Pulaski County, Arkansas. The 
applications were filed by Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLV for Project No. 
14180-000 and FFP Project 2, LLC for Project No. 14193-000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any 
document received after regular business hours is considered filed 
at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) 
(2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 22, 2012, at 9 a.m. (Eastern Time), the Secretary of 
the Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to 
determine the filing priority of the applicants identified in this 
notice. The Commission will select among competing permit applications 
as provided in section 4.37 of its regulations.\2\ The priority 
established by this drawing will be used to determine which applicant, 
among those with identical filing times, will be considered to have the 
first-filed application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 18 CFR 4.37 (2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the 
Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary 
announcing the results of the drawing.

    Dated: February 10, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-3636 Filed 2-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**EDDIE BELL,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 481 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 9th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT Aug. 14, 2012 Report Request ID: 1012181 Report Code: AMP430

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID:FMC

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date 04 023 0004 88101 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

SELECTED OPTIONS OZONE EVALUATION AGENCY ROLE MERGE PDF FILES Option Type Option Value SEASONAL-HOURLY REPORTING YES SORT ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Order Column

EPA_REGION STATE_CODE MONITOR_TYPE COUNTY_CODE SITE_ID PARAMETER_CODE POC GLOBAL DATES 2010 Start Date End Date 2010 1 12 Tribal CodeAug. 14, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 1 of 4 MONITORS NOT REPORTINGAug. 14, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 2 of 4 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

Arizona MONITOR TYPE: Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality SLAMS JAN. 01, 2010 DEC. 31, 2010

THRU SITE ID CITY ADDRESS PARAMETER POCDURATION METHOD ------------------------------- OBSERVATIONS ------------------------------- NUMBER / PERCENT 04-023-0004 88101PM2.5 - Local Conditions 17 Nogales 300 N MORLEY AVE 143 5 100% 5

100% 3

60% 5 100% 5 100% 5 100% 6

100% 5 100% 4

80% 5 100% 5 100% 5 100% 58

95% MONITORS REPORTING

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR STATE: REP ORG:Aug. 14, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 3 of 4 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

Arizona MONITOR TYPE: Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality QA COLLOCATED JAN. 01, 2010 DEC. 31, 2010

THRU SITE ID CITY ADDRESS PARAMETER POCDURATION METHOD ------------------------------- OBSERVATIONS ------------------------------- NUMBER / PERCENT 04-023-0004 88101PM2.5 - Local Conditions 2 7 Nogales 300 N MORLEY AVE 143 5 100% 5

100% 5 100% 5 100% 5 100% 5 100% 6

100% 5 100% 4

80% 5 100% 4

80% 5 100% 59

97% MONITORS REPORTING

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR STATE: REP ORG:Aug. 14, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 4 of 4 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

Arizona MONITOR TYPE: MONITOR TYPE:

Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality SLAMS QA COLLOCATED JAN. 01, 2010 DEC. 31, 2010

THRU

PARAMETER PARAMETER ACTIVE MONITORS ACTIVE MONITORS # NOT REPORTING # NOT REPORTING # MONITORS > 75% # MONITORS > 75% MONITORS AVG COMPLETENESS MONITORS AVG COMPLETENESS 88101 88101 PM2.5 - Local Conditions

PM2.5 - Local Conditions 1 1 0 0 1 1 95.0% 97.0% 1 1 0 0 1 1 95.0% 97.0% 2 0 2 96.0% 2 0 2 96.0% 2 0 2 96.0% 2 0 2 96.0% Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality Arizona REGION SUMMARY:(09) SAN FRANCISCO REPORT SUMMARY: MT SUMMARY: MT SUMMARY:SLAMS

QA COLLOCATED REPORT SUMMARY STATE:

STATE SUMMARY: REP ORG:

RO SUMMARY:
Order entered March 27, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01106-CR

GERARDO ISRAEL STRAUSS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-33722-Q

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s March 25, 2019 motion to extend time to file appellant’s 

brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER the brief received March 25, 2019 filed as 

of the date of this order.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1962/2005

of 30 November 2005         

derogating from Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 as regards the determination of the refund rate for milk and milk products in the case of supplies as referred to in Articles 36 and 44 of that Regulation and carried out from 1 to 16 June 2005         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 31(14) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

By way of derogation from Article 37(2) of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999, the date 16 June 2005 shall be used to determine the rate of refund applicable to milk and milk products in the case of supplies as referred to in Article 36(1)(a) and (c) and in Article 44(1)(a) and (b) of that Regulation and carried out from 1 to 16 June 2005 in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 37 of that Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 154, 17.6.2005, p. 10.

(3)OJ L 102, 17.4.1999, p. 11. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 671/2004 (OJ L 105, 14.4.2004, p. 5).

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000854066
<NAME> GEODYNE INSTITUTIONAL/PENSION ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP P-3
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         415,354
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  396,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               811,552
<PP&E>                                      12,571,148
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,414,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,968,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,968,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,968,083
<SALES>                                      1,706,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,825,212
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  725,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,099,886
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,099,886
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,099,886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (3.05 MB)

Tags:MAF, missiles, LF, 91 MW, missile complex, Airman 1st Class Alyssa M. Akers, Alyssa Akers, Akers, 5th Force Support Squadron, 5 FSS, code change, missile chef, AF, training, Minot AFB, 5th Bomb Wing, home, 91st Missile Wing, 5 BW, Airmen, Air Force, food, Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, ND, development, family, breakfast, lunch, chefs, take care of Airmen, home-cooked meal, meal, mealtime, dinner, midnight snack, missile field, Airman 1st Class Amanda Owen, Amanda Owen, Owen, Missile Alert Facility, Launch Facility, home away from home

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130645 & (14) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 130645 

 COA: 266877 

Muskegon CC: 96-139083-FH

RAYMOND LANE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 11, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion to remand 

is DENIED. 

s0522 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2006 

Clerk