alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.72 MB)

Tags:Nev., medication, pharmacy , Mike O’Callaghan Federal Medical Center, 99th Medical Support Squadron , Pyxis, NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.98 MB)

Tags:Loglines, Rapid Deployment Teams, july 2017

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134258 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134258 

 COA: 277489 

Berrien CC: 2006-406195-FH 

EARNEST WHITE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 3 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 3

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
relative to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may 
    serve to 3 in the House of Representatives and 2 in the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 23 (legislative day, January 3), 2013

 Mr. Paul (for himself and Mr. Vitter) introduced the following joint 
 resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
relative to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may 
    serve to 3 in the House of Representatives and 2 in the Senate.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person who has served three terms as a 
Representative shall be eligible for election to the House of 
Representatives. For purposes of this section, the election of a person 
to fill a vacancy in the House of Representatives shall be included as 
one term in determining the number of terms that such person has served 
as a Representative if the person fills the vacancy for more than one 
year.
    ``Section 2. No person who has served two terms as a Senator shall 
be eligible for election or appointment to the Senate. For purposes of 
this section, the election or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy 
in the Senate shall be included as one term in determining the number 
of terms that such person has served as a Senator if the person fills 
the vacancy for more than three years.
    ``Section 3. No term beginning before the date of the ratification 
of this article shall be taken into account in determining eligibility 
for election or appointment under this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of J. Frank Vieillard, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

March 18, 1959.

*Shapiro Driscoll & Gottschalk*for petitioner.

*Harry Pfeffer*for respondents.

John D. Bennett, S.

As much of the proponent’s application is granted as seeks a preliminary hearing to determine the status of the contestants who were named as beneficiaries in a prior will executed by the decedent on February 5, 1957. The decedent’s signature on this instrument, as submitted, has a red line drawn through it (see *Matter of Dicks,*267 App. Div. 117; *Matter of Fehringer,*183 Misc. 438). The facts presented in *Matter of Aims*(199 Misc. 185); *Matter of Aspenleiter*(187 Misc. 167); *Matter of Cohen*(151 Misc. 98); *Matter of Hendrickson*(99 N. Y. S. 2d 664); *Matter of Irvin*(N. Y. L. J., May 15, 1958, p. 7, col. 5) render them inapplicable here.

The motion to dismiss will be held in abeyance pending a determination of the issue of revocation of the prior will.
#### Carol FREY, Petitioner, v. ADAMS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14 and Board of Education of Adams County School District No. 14, Respondents.

No. 89SC234.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Jan. 16, 1990.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari GRANTED.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF T.J.L., JR.,

A C HILD. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 2 4

- 00 072

- CV

Appeal from the

21st Judicial District Court

o f Burleson County, Texas

(TC# 31170 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before this Court is Appellant’s motion to dismiss. 1 Appellant’s motion states that she has

filed motions in the trial court to amend the order at issue in this appeal, and the appeal is not ripe

for our review. As the Court has not yet issued an opinion in this case, the motion to dismiss the

appeal is granted pursuant to Texas Rule of A ppellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1)

. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.1(a) (1) (allowing appe llate courts to dismiss an appeal on the motion of the appellant). Costs

of the appeal are taxed against Appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d)

.

GINA M. PALAFOX

, Justice

April 26 , 202 4

Before Alley , C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.

1 This case was transferred from the Tenth Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the

Supreme Court of Texas. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 73.001 . We follow the precedent of the Tenth Court of Appeals

to the extent it might conflict with our own. See Tex. R. App. P. 41.3

.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 430 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 430

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2014, as ``Silver Star 
                         Service Banner Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 2014

  Mrs. McCaskill (for herself and Mr. Blunt) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2014, as ``Silver Star 
                         Service Banner Day''.

Whereas the Senate has always honored the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill 
        members of the Armed Forces;
Whereas the Silver Star Service Banner has come to represent the members of the 
        Armed Forces and veterans who were wounded or became ill in combat in 
        the wars fought by the United States;
Whereas the Silver Star Families of America was formed to help the American 
        people remember the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill members of 
        the Armed Forces by designing and manufacturing Silver Star Service 
        Banners and Silver Star Flags for that purpose;
Whereas the sole mission of the Silver Star Families of America is to evoke 
        memories of the sacrifices of members and veterans of the Armed Forces 
        on behalf of the United States through the presence of a Silver Star 
        Service Banner in a window or a Silver Star Flag flying;
Whereas the sacrifices of members and veterans of the Armed Forces on behalf of 
        the United States should never be forgotten; and
Whereas May 1, 2014, is an appropriate date to designate as ``Silver Star 
        Service Banner Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate supports the designation of May 1, 2014, 
as ``Silver Star Service Banner Day'' and calls upon the people of the 
United States to observe the day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, 
and activities.
                                 <all>
```
### SERVE D JUL Y 6 , 201 0 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASfflNGTON , D.C
. I N TH E MATTE RO F MARI A TAVERAS , Respondent
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP10SW000 5 DM S NO
. FAA-2010-031 6

HEARIN G NOTIC E PLEAS E TAK

E NOTICE tha

t the hearing in thi s cas e will b e hel don July 15 , 2010 , beginning a

t 10:0 0 a.m. , loca

l tim e a t the following location : Manhatta n Servic e Distric t 2 6 Federa l Plaza , Roo

m23 0 New York, NY 1027 8 nI T "Tin' I



### Allo w time to pas s through security
.

Isaa c D . Benkin Administrativ e La

w Judg e Attachment-Servic e Lis t

L.s
_FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP10SW000 5 (Civi l Penalty Action )
SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-4 3 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 *

ON E COP Y Alexe i Schacht , Respondent' s Counse l Nalve n & Schacht , Attorney s at La w 35 0 Fift h Avenue , Suit e 402 2 New York , N Y 1011 8 TEL : 212-616-554 0 FAX : 212-616-554 3 Yoland aAyal aBemal , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Southwes t

Region , ASW-7E3 , YA B Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 MeachamBoulevar d For t Worth , T X 76137-000 7 TEL : 817-222-509 9 FAX : 817-222-5945/509 2 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D . Benkin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r

202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000, Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1959** 

In re: LARRY RAY MITCHELL , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (No. 5:16

- ct

- 03057

- D)

Submitted : January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
. Larry Ray Mitchell, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Larry Ray Mitchell petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order for his immediate release . We conclude that Mitchell is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U
. S
. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) ; United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass ’ n , 860 F. 2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988)
. This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials, Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg Cnty. , 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969), and does not have jurisdiction to review final state cou rt orders, Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983). The relief sought by Mitchell is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the fact s and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 10(b)


 


CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


 


We hereby consent to the
use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-113070)
of our report dated March 31, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules of Protective Life Insurance
Company and subsidiaries, which appears in such Registration Statement.  We also consent to the use in this
Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-113070) of our
report dated April 23, 2010, relating to the financial statements of
Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account, which appears in such
Registration Statement.  We also consent
to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Registration
Statement.


 


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP


PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP


Birmingham, Alabama


April 27, 2010
Order filed July 10, 2018.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00384

- CV

____________ MIDTOWN PARK DEVELOP MENT LTD, PAUL T. YO UNG AND

HORIZON 2003, LLC , Appellant s

V.
LOUIS F. GOZA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 212th Distric t Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 14

- CV

- 0010



### O R D E R Appellant s ’ brief

s were due June 22, 2018

. No brief or motion for extension
of time has been filed.

Unless appellant s file a brief with this court on or before July 2 5 , 2018 , th e court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
SERVED: DECEMBER 11, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF MISSISSIPPI AIREXPRESS, LLC

DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0866 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING : i

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013S0950114)has been assignedto Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List. --··-- 

# \
.. )

**r.~**

Attachment

- Service List 

# ~ **~---<_\_,.**

**'--~:A. Y~er--·**  // ChiefAdministrative La0udge
........ 

# (

____....SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1 ONE COPY 

### Mississippi AirExpress, LLC, Respondent 

### 233 Clark Farms Rd. Madison, MS 39110 Wayne E. Ferrell, Jr., Respondent's Counsel 

### Law Offices ofWayne E. Ferrell, Jr. P.O. Box 24448 405 Tombigbee St. Jackson,MS 39228-4448 Deitrick H. Johnson, Complainant's Counsel 

### Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Southern Region 1701 Columbia Avenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FPCK: 404-305-5223 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,AdministrativeLawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-20 14-0866 · (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430. 

### -2-
#### Perkins et al., Appellees, *v.*Trustees of Monroe Avenue Church of Christ, Appellants.

(No. 30931

Decided March 5, 1947.)

*538
      *Messrs. Davies & Davies,*for appellees.'

*Mr. Frank G. Shearer*and *Mr. David D. White,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Zimmerman and Sohngen, JJ., concur.

Hart, J., not participating.
Exhibit 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Robert I. Jordan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Southern Sauce
Company, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared;

   (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
   controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
   the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
   the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
   internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
   business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
   fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
   affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
   issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
   summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
   over financial reporting.

Date: July 19, 2007

/s/ Robert I. Jordan
    President