Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Notices 72239 

Modality of completion Number of 

respondents 

Frequency of 

response 

Average 

burden per 

response 

(minutes) 

Estimated total 

annual burden 

(hours) 

HA–4631 .......................................................................................................... 200,000 1 10 33,333 

5. Certification of Low Birth Weight 

for SSI Eligibility of Funds You Provided 

to Another and Statement of Funds You 

Received—20 CFR 416.931, 

416.926a(m), and 416.924—0960–0720. 

Hospitals and claimants use Form SSA– 

3380 to provide medical information to 

local field offices (FO) and the DDS on 

behalf of infants with low birth weight. 

FOs use the form as a protective filing 

statement and the medical information 

to make presumptive disability findings, 

which allow expedited payment to 

eligible claimants. DDSs use the medical 

information to determine disability and 

continuing disability. The respondents 

are hospitals and claimants who have 

information identifying low birth weight 

babies and their medical conditions. 

Type of Request: Revision of an OMBapproved information collection. 

Modality of completion Number of 

respondents 

Frequency of 

response 

Average 

burden per 

response 

(minutes) 

Estimated total 

annual burden 

(hours) 

SSA–3380 ........................................................................................................ 28,125 1 15 7,031 

6. Request to Show Cause for Failure 

to Appear—20 CFR 404.938, 20 CFR 

416.1438, and 20 CFR 404.957(a)(ii)— 

0960–0794. When claimants who 

requested a hearing before an ALJ fail to 

appear at their scheduled hearing, the 

ALJ may reschedule the hearing if the 

claimants establish good cause for 

missing the hearings. To establish good 

cause, claimants must show one of the 

following: (1) SSA did not properly 

notify the claimant of the hearing, or (2) 

an unexpected event occurred without 

sufficient time for the claimant to 

request a postponement. The claimants 

can use paper Form HA–L90 to provide 

their reason for not appearing at their 

scheduled hearings; or the claimants’ 

representatives can use Electronic 

Records Express to submit the HA–L90 

online. If the ALJ determines the 

claimants established good cause for 

failure to appear at the hearing, the ALJ 

will schedule a supplemental hearing; if 

not, the ALJ will make a claims 

eligibility determination based on the 

claimants’ evidence of record. 

Respondents are claimants, or their 

representatives, seeking to establish 

good cause for failure to appear at a 

scheduled hearing before an ALJ. 

Type of Request: Extension of an 

OMB-approved information collection. 

Modality of completion Number of 

respondents 

Frequency of 

response 

Average 

burden per 

response 

(minutes) 

Estimated total 

annual burden 

(hours) 

HA–L90 (paper or Electronic Records Express) ............................................. 40,000 1 10 6,667 

Dated: December 2, 2014. 

Faye Lipsky, 

Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28562 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4191–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To 

Release Airport Property at Eufaula 

Municipal Airport, Eufaula, Arkansas 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of Request to Release 

Airport Property. 

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and 

invites public comment on the release of 

land at Eufaula Municipal Airport under 

the provisions of Section 125 of the 

Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment 

Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 

21). 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before January 5, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Comments on this 

application may be mailed or delivered 

to the FAA at the following address: Mr. 

Glenn A Boles, Manager, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Southwest 

Region, Airports Division, AR/OK 

Airports Development Office, ASW– 

630, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. 

In addition, one copy of any 

comments submitted to the FAA must 

be mailed or delivered to The Honorable 

Selina Jayne-Dornan, Mayor of Eufaula 

at the following address: City of Eufaula, 

Oklahoma, 64 Memorial Drive, Eufaula, 

OK 74432. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs 

Kathy Franklin, Program Manager, 

Federal Aviation Administration, AR/

OK Airports Development Office, ASW– 

630, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, 

Texas 76137. 

The request to release property may 

be reviewed in person at this same 

location. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

invites public comment on the request 

to release property at the Eufaula 

Municipal Airport under the provisions 

of the AIR 21. 

On November 18, 2014, the FAA 

determined that the request to release 

property at Eufaula Municipal Airport 

submitted by the City of Eufaula met the 

procedural requirements of the Federal 

aviation Regulations, Part 155. The FAA 

may approve the request, in whole or in 

part, no later than January, 2015. 

The following is a brief overview of 

the request: The City of Eufaula requests 

the release of 14.68 acres of airport 

property valued at $29,360.00. The 

release of property will allow for the 

sale of the property to the Oklahoma 

Department of Transportation for the 

development of an industrial facility for 

maintenance activities. The City of 

Eufaula will use the $29,360.00 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
72240 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Notices 

1We note that, due to the unique characteristics 

of this mission, FAA regulations require us to 

account for risks that are typically not included in 

our § 417.107 analysis—namely, the uncontrolled 

reentry of an upper stage after orbital insertion. 

2Although the module is a reentry vehicle and 

not a reusable launch vehicle, 14 CFR 435.33 

incorporates and applies § 431.43 to all reentry 

vehicles. 

3Our March 2014 Notice correctly identified the 

total mission debris risk as 165 × 10¥6, but when 

breaking down the sources of that risk, we listed 

four risk factors adding up to a total of only 164 

× 10¥6. 79 FR at 13376. This breakdown mistakenly 

omitted the debris risk related from controlled 

disposal of the upper stage, with an Ec of < 1 × 

10¥6. 

resulting from the sale to fund 

construction of a pilots lounge and 

restrooms which are not presently 

available at the airport. 

Any person may inspect the request 

in person at the FAA office listed above 

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

In addition, any person may, upon 

request, inspect the application, notice 

and other documents germane to the 

application in person at the Eufaula 

Municipal Airport. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November 

18, 2014. 

Byron K. Huffman, 

Acting Manager, Airports Division. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28611 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Commercial Space 

Transportation; Amended Waiver for 

Launch and Mission Risk 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of amended waiver. 

SUMMARY: This notice concerns an 

amendment to a waiver related to the 

launch and reentry of an Orion MultiPurpose Crew Vehicle. On March 10, 

2014, the FAA issued United Launch 

Alliance (ULA) and Lockheed Martin 

(Lockheed) waivers to certain risk 

requirements of the FAA’s regulations. 

Since that time, changes to the mission’s 

flight plan have increased its risk 

profile. After analyzing this updated 

risk profile, the FAA finds that the 

analysis underlying the original waiver 

decisions still applies. The FAA, 

therefore, amends its original waiver to 

permit launch risk from debris of 217 × 

10¥6 and total mission risk from debris 

of up to 218 × 10¥6. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

technical questions concerning this 

waiver, contact Charles P. Brinkman, 

Aerospace Engineer, AST–200, Office of 

Commercial Space Transportation 

(AST), Federal Aviation Administration, 

800 Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 

267–7715; email: phil.brinkman@

faa.gov. For legal questions concerning 

this waiver, contact Benjamin Jacobs, 

Attorney-Advisor, Regulations Division 

(AGC–210), Office of the Chief Counsel, 

Federal Aviation Administration, 800 

Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 

267–7240; email: benjamin.jacobs@

faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Lockheed and ULA are private 

commercial space flight companies. 

Lockheed entered into a contract with 

the National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration (NASA) to provide the 

first orbital flight test for NASA’s Orion 

Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (Orion) 

Program. Lockheed has contracted with 

ULA to provide launch services for the 

mission. 

The FAA is responsible for licensing, 

among other things, the launch of a 

launch vehicle and the reentry of a 

reentry vehicle, under authority granted 

to the Secretary of Transportation by 51 

U.S.C. Subtitle V, chapter 509 (Chapter 

509), and delegated to the FAA’s 

Administrator and Associate 

Administrator for Commercial Space 

Transportation. 

The mission at issue in this notice is 

Orion Exploration Flight Test 1, which 

is scheduled to launch from Cape 

Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida 

in early December. The mission tests the 

Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle in an 

un-crewed, limited-capability 

configuration, and serves as a stepping 

stone towards a crew-capable vehicle 

that would enable human exploration 

missions beyond Earth orbit. The 

mission is comprised of a launch, which 

is conducted by ULA, and a reentry, 

which is conducted by Lockheed. The 

launch vehicle is ULA’s Delta IV Heavy 

launch vehicle, which consists of a 

Common Booster Core (CBC) as the first 

stage with two additional strap-on CBCs 

and a Delta IV Cryogenic Second Stage 

(DCSS). The first burn of the DCSS 

places the Orion and the DCSS in orbit, 

and a second DCSS burn places the 

Orion into a highly elliptical, negativeperigee trajectory, to simulate the 

thermal conditions and high reentry 

speeds the module would experience 

returning from missions beyond Earth 

orbit. After separating from the DCSS, 

the Orion module reenters over the 

eastern Pacific Ocean, splashing down 

231 nautical miles west of Baja 

California, Mexico.1

Section 417.107(b)(1) of Title 14 of the 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 

prohibits, in relevant part, the launch of 

a launch vehicle if the expected casualty 

(Ec) rate for the flight exceeds 30 × 10¥6

for impacting inert and explosive debris 

(debris). Section 435.35 establishes 

acceptable risk for reentry vehicles, and 

requires operators to comply with 

§§ 431.35(a) and 431.35(b)(1)(i),2 which 

in turn prohibit an Ec for debris in 

excess of 30 × 10¥6 for both launch and 

reentry combined. 

On February 27, 2014, ULA petitioned 

the FAA for waivers of these provisions 

because the projected risk from debris 

during launch was 164 × 10¥ 6, and the 

projected risk from debris during 

reentry was less than 1 × 10¥6—for a 

total-mission debris risk of 

approximately 165 × 10¥6. The FAA 

issued a waiver and, on March 10, 2014, 

gave notice in the Federal Register. 

Notice of Waiver, Mar. 10, 2014 (79 FR 

13375). This initial waiver allowed a 

maximum-allowable Ec value for ULA 

and Lockheed’s proposed mission of 

165 × 10¥6,3 based on the risk increase 

the launch operators requested. 

On November 3, 2014, ULA and 

Lockheed transmitted to the FAA the 

mission’s final trajectory and an 

updated risk analysis. Since that time, 

ULA and Lockheed have continued to 

submit updated risk information, as it 

becomes available, to the FAA. 

According to these documents, it is 

necessary for ULA and Lockheed to 

modify the mission’s launch trajectory, 

for two reasons: To lower the mission’s 

maximum heating temperature 

constraint, and to adjust the flight 

azimuth to be the same as what was 

flown in previous missions. On 

November 20, 2014, in light of the 

changed mission trajectory, ULA 

petitioned for an amendment to its 

waiver to allow an Ec of 207 × 10¥6 for 

debris from launch. On November 21, 

2014, Lockheed petitioned for an 

amendment to its waiver to allow total 

mission risk of 208 × 10¥6. 

Using ULA’s updated trajectory, the 

FAA calculates the debris-related Ec for 

failure during the de-orbit burn, after 

the first 120 seconds, increases to 76 × 

10¥6 from 53 × 10¥6. In addition, 

calculations by the FAA and the United 

States Air Force indicate an increased 

debris risk, from launch to orbital 

insertion, of approximately 30 × 10¥6

above original estimates. As a result, the 

FAA calculates that overall launch risk 

increases from 164 × 10¥6 to 217 × 

10¥6, and total mission risk increases 

from 165 × 10¥6 to 218 × 10¥6. The 

FAA believes these risk figures best 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES