alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.91 MB)

Tags:DHA, DLA Distribution, Medical supply chain, Strong Partnerships, DLA Troop Support, Influenza Vaccination Program

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Chester Ku, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Glass Wave Enterprises, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Glass Wave Enterprises, Inc. for the nine month period ended October 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Glass Wave Enterprises, Inc. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated:  December 14, 2006

/s/ Chester Ku

Chester Ku, President, Secretary and Treasurer 

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Glass Wave Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Glass Wave Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 29 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.J.Res.29

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                            Joint Resolution

 
Providing for the appointment of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey as a citizen regent 
         of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Patricia Q. Stonesifer of 
Washington, DC, on December 21, 2013, is filled by the appointment of 
Risa Lavizzo-Mourey of Pennsylvania. The appointment is for a term of 6 
years, beginning on the later of December 22, 2013, or the date of 
enactment of this joint resolution.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# 1 IGINAIJ

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22-0483 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee.
v. KEVIN CHARLES WALLA,

Defendant and Appellant. ORDER 

# FILED MAR - 5 2024 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana Appellant Kevin Charles Walla moves to stay appellate briefing in order to reconstruct the record of a September 13, 2021 motion hearing and an October 18, 2021 Informal Omnibus Hearing, concerning his requests for a mental health evaluation by a PTSD expert and a new deadline for disclosing expert witnesses. Walla representsthat the on February 15, 2024,thecourt reporter notified theDistrict Court and thepartiesthat dueto a recording equipment failure no record ofthe September hearingwas available. The court reporter filed an affidavit to that effect with this Court on the same date. As to the informal omnibus hearing, Walla states that no minutes ofthat hearing are listed on the case register and that no written record exists beyond the second omnibus order. Walla indicates further that, without agreeing with his account ofthe hearings at issue, the State does not object to Walla's request to move the district court to establish a record of the two hearings in question. M.R.App. P. 8(7)sets forththe procedure for recreatinga portion oftherecord ifitis unavailable. Walla correctly observes that the deadlines in the rule cannot be met here, because Rule 8(7)(c)requiresthe movingpartyto file amotionwiththeDistrict Courtwithin fifteen days after filing the notice of appeal. Subsection (b) alternatively permits a joint written statement and stipulation between the parties, but it must be submitted with the District Court within thirty days after notice ofappeal is filed. Here, Walla filed his Notice 03/05/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0483ofAppeal on August 25, 2022. The court reporter did not advise ofthe unavailability ofthe

September 2021 hearing record untiljust last month, and Walla submits that there is good cause to allow his request to proceed regarding both hearings despite the delay. Without objection by the State, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is STAYED pending the filing ofthe statement of unavailable hearing record pursuant to M. R. App. P. 8(7). The District Court retains the necessary jurisdiction to resolve this issue under M. R. App. P. 8(7)(g). The parties are directed to proceed in accordance with M. R. App. P. 8(7). The Clerk is directed to provide notice ofthis order to all counsel ofrecord, to the Clerk ofthe Tenth Jud'cial District Court, and to the Hon. Heather Perry, presidingjudge. Dated this day ofMarch, 2024.

2 ChiefJustice
.1-z 7 1 2^


# m 

# Justices
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JOHN SIMMONS,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 13 EAP 2016

Appeal from the Order of 

Commonwealth Court dated January 

13, 2016 at No. 551 MD 2015

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2017, Appellant’s petition for leave to file 

post-submission communications is DENIED, and the order of the Commonwealth 

Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF THE REGISTRANT AT FEBRUARY 29, 1996 AND FEBRUARY
28, 1995 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE REGISTRANT FOR THE
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 1996 AND FEBRUARY 28, 1995 AND 1994 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS IN THE FORM 10-K FOR
THE TWELVE MONTH PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 1996.

</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                               MAR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                 FEB-29-1996
<CASH>                                         3,318,000
<SECURITIES>                                   2,752,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                 15,655,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              30,731,000
<PP&E>                                         5,690,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                37,614,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         12,556,000 
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0 
<PREFERRED>                                            0 
<COMMON>                                               0 
<OTHER-SE>                                        39,000 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  37,614,000 
<SALES>                                                0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              69,825,000 
<CGS>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 68,565,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               310,000 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,283,000 
<INCOME-TAX>                                     485,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              798,000 
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (99,000) 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0 
<CHANGES>                                              0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     699,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .18 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .18 
        

</TABLE>
March 15, 2006

To Whom it may Concern, 

We at Boston Engineering are pleased to submit this letter of support regarding the Section 333 

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Commercial Use Exemption petition to the FAA by Unmanned Aerial 

Systems Development, Inc. (UASD) of Holliston, MA. Through their ongoing research initiatives, 

UASD stands to become a significant supplier of UAV technology and services in the robotics 

engineering research industry, both locally in New England and nationally.

Boston Engineering Corporation is a well-established engineering services organization that has 

delivered leading-edge products and system solutions to customers for over 19 years. Boston 

Engineering conducts design and analysis and testing of autonomous robotic systems. The 

company includes a multi-disciplined, cross-functional team of approximately 60 employees. We 

have headquarters with 20,500 sq. ft. of office and lab space in Waltham MA, where we 

specialize in ground-based and underwater robotics, electromechanical systems, development 

and use of embedded software, custom manufacturing systems, specialized motor controllers 

and actuators, and human-robot interaction. Since 2009 we have designed and built and 

demonstrated two new Biomimetic underwater vehicles: ONR and NAVSEA’s Ghost swimmer 

and the DHS’s BIO Swimmer, Designed an autonomous control and manipulator for remote 

robotic door opening for TARDEC’s “AURIS” program, and are actively involved with the DARPA 

funded Human Robotic Interaction (HRI) “R-Lucid” program. Boston Engineering is a Gold-level 

PTC Channel Advantage VAR that offers training, sales & support, performance toolkits, and 

additional solutions for product optimization. 

As leaders in the design and development of autonomous vehicles and robotics systems, BEC 

can attest to the unprecedented level of demand for safety and performance advancements that 

the impending integration of UAVs into our nation’s airspace has already created. Meeting these 

significant technology developments will require robust systems design and testing, and 

executing these tests under real world conditions will vastly improve results. Granting operators 

like UASD the authorization to conduct commercial operations will help foster such research 

programs with valuable data that will otherwise be missing from the development and growth of 

our nation’s UAV industry.

To this end, we urge the FAA to approve UASD’s commercial exemption petition as submitted, 

and look forward to participating fully in the continued growth of our nation’s flight programs.

Sincerely yours, 

Mark Smithers

Mark Smithers

Vice President, CTO

Boston Engineering Corporation

(781) 466-8010

MSmithers@Boston-Engineering.com

______________________________________________________________________________

_ 

Boston Engineering Corporation ● 300 Bear Hill Road, Waltham, MA 02451 ● 781-466-8010 ● Fax: 781-466-8020 ● www.boston-engineering.com
Order entered April 9, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00191-CR

JOHN WHEELER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-10261-T

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this jury trial is past due. By postcard dated February 15, 2019, 

we notified court reporter Vearneas Faggett that the reporter’s record was overdue. We directed 

her to file the (1) reporter’s record, (2) written verification that no hearings were recorded, or (3) 

written verification that appellant has not requested the reporter’s record by March 17, 2019. To 

date, the reporter’s record has not been filed and we have had no communication from Ms. 

Faggett.

We ORDER the complete reporter’s record filed BY APRIL 19, 2019. We caution 

Ms. Faggett that the failure to do so will result in the Court taking whatever remedies it has 

available to ensure that the appeal proceeds in a timely fashion, which may include ordering that 

she not sit until the complete reporter’s record is filed.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Lela Lawrence 

Mays, Presiding Judge, 283rd Judicial District Court; Vearneas Faggett, official court reporter, 

283rd Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.28 MB)

Tags:Town Hall, DLA Aviation, :, Warfighter First, People and Culture

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### Gilbert R. WILBURN, Plaintiff and Petitioner, v. INTERSTATE ELECTRIC, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Second Injury Fund and Utah State Industrial Commission, Defendants and Respondents.

No. 880086.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 23, 1989.

Michael E. Dyer, Lloyd A. Hardcastle, Salt Lake City, for Gilbert R. Wilburn.

Stuart L. Poelman, Larry R. Layeock, Salt Lake City, for Interstate Elec, and Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co.

Erie V. Boorman, Salt Lake City, for Second Injury Fund.

HALL, Chief Justice:

The petition for certiorari is hereby dismissed, the same having been improvidently granted.

DURHAM and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., and GREENWOOD, Court of Appeals Judge, concur.

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice

(dissenting):

I dissent. I do not join in dismissing the writ of certiorari. No valid reason exists for doing so, and the majority expresses none. In *Israel Pagan Estate v. Capitol Thrift and Loan,*771 P.2d 1032, 1033, 104 Utah Adv.Rep. 3, 3-4 (Utah 1989) (Howe, Associate C.J., dissenting), I set out the conditions under which the United States Supreme Court dismisses writs of certiorari as having been improvidently granted and *1150suggested that we follow its practice. None of those conditions exist here, and I decry the wasteful use of time and money of the parties, their lawyers and this Court which dismissal promotes. I refer the reader to that opinion for a full expression of my views on this practice.

STEWART, J., does not participate herein; GREENWOOD, Court of Appeals Judge, sat.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 9964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3963]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Availability of the Reclamation National Environmental Policy Act 
Handbook

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) is announcing the 
availability of its updated National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 
Handbook. This handbook is intended for use as guidance by 
Reclamation's NEPA practitioners. It provides a quick reference for 
existing laws, regulations, policies, and other guidance. It is a 
guidance document, and as such, does not create or alter any policy or 
otherwise implement any law and should not be cited as a source of 
authority. Reclamation is announcing the availability of its NEPA 
Handbook to assure transparency of its efforts to the public.

ADDRESSES: The updated Reclamation NEPA Handbook is available online at 
www.usbr.gov/NEPA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Cunningham, Water and 
Environmental Resources Division, Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 
25007, Denver, Colorado 80225; telephone 303-445-2875.

Grayford F. Payne,
Deputy Commissioner--Policy, Administration and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2012-3963 Filed 2-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00259-CV

M. S., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-FM-12-006947, HONORABLE SCOTT H. JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due to be filed on May 5, 2014. 

By request to this Court dated May 14, 2014, Chavela Crain requested an extension of time in 

which to complete the record.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure prohibit this Court from granting 

extensions of over 10 days for the filing of reporters’ records in accelerated appeals, including 

those from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Further, any 

extensions of time granted for the filing of the reporters’ records may not exceed 30 days 

cumulatively. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(2). Accordingly, Chavela Crain is hereby ordered to 

file the reporter’s record in this case on or before May 27, 2014. If the record is not filed by that 

date, Crain may be required to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court.
It is ordered on May 15, 2014.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose