alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.74 MB)

Tags:Loglines, MacDill Air Force Base, September 2018, DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 23.4

Ryder Scott Company
Petroleum Consultants

1100 Louisiana                                              Fax (713) 651-0849
Suite 3800
Houston, TX  77002-5218                               Telephone (713) 651-9191






                      CONSENT OF PETROLEUM CONSULTING FIRM




      We consent to the  reference to our name included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 for Geodyne Instituitonal/Pension
Energy Income Limited Partnership P-5.


                              //s// Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

                              RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.




Houston, Texas
March 17, 2004
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 11 January 2006         

amending Appendix A to Annex V to the 2003 Act of Accession as regards certain establishments in the meat and milk sectors in the Czech Republic

(notified under document number C(2005) 6052)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/17/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, and in particular Annex V, Chapter 3, Section A(1), paragraph (d) thereto,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Appendix A to Annex V to the 2003 Act of Accession is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 January 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ C 227 E, 23.9.2003, p. 14.

----

ANNEX

                     ‘Appendix A

referred to in Chapter 3, Section A(1) to Annex V (*1)

List of establishments, including shortcomings and deadlines for the correction of these shortcomings

SLAUGHTERHOUSES

MEAT PROCESSING AND MANUFACTURING OF MEAT PRODUCTS

DAIRIES

----

(*1)  For the text of Annex V see OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 803.

----
#### Steven M. JOHNS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Kenneth V. SHULSEN, Warden, Utah State Prison, et al., Defendants and Appellees.

No. 890058.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Dec. 4, 1989.

*1152Steven M. Johns, pro se.

David L. Wilkinson, Paul M. Tinker, Salt Lake City, for defendants and appellees.

PER CURIAM:

This Court reviewed the denial of plaintiff’s previous petition for a writ of habeas corpus and issued its opinion affirming the trial court’s order on April 21, 1986. The opinion may be found at *Johns v. Shulsen,*717 P.2d 1336 (Utah 1986). The reader is referred thereto for the facts underlying plaintiff’s incarceration and revocation of his parole.

On May 20, 1986, plaintiff applied for a writ of habeas corpus to the federal district court for Utah. However, the federal magistrate ruled that the petition was a mixture of claims on which state remedies had been exhausted and those which had not been exhausted. He dismissed the petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b) and (c) and *Rose v. Lundy,*455 U.S. 509, 102 S.Ct. 1198, 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982). In his report and recommendation, the federal magistrate stated: “Comity dictates the Utah courts be afforded an opportunity to state whether there is a procedural default in this case,” which would preclude federal review of the issue.

After dismissal of his federal action, plaintiff, with the assistance of appointed counsel, once more applied to the state court for a writ of habeas corpus. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court entered its memorandum decision on June 27, 1987, in which it determined that the only unexhausted claim raised by plaintiff is his allegation that he was denied his right to a speedy revocation hearing.

The trial court ruled that the circumstances of this case do not show any unusual circumstances which would dictate an exception to our procedural default standard, particularly in view of the fact that plaintiffs revocation hearing was held within a reasonable time under *Morrissey v. Brewer,*408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972). We agree.

This is plaintiffs second appeal from the denial of a petition for habeas corpus relief. In *Hurst v. Cook,*777 P.2d 1029 (Utah 1989), this Court ruled that the prior adjudication of a habeas petition does not bar the adjudication of a subsequent petition as a matter of res judicata. However, Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 65B(i)(4) does require a showing of good cause for seeking a successive writ. Plaintiff did not raise the issue of a speedy revocation hearing in his first petition for habeas corpus and has not shown that he was previously unable to assert this issue or that he has now become aware of facts which were unknown to him at the time. Nor has he shown any other good cause for filing a successive petition. We find no unusual circumstances that would warrant relieving plaintiff of his waiver. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.

We have considered the other issues raised by plaintiff and find them to be without merit.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (4.47 MB)

Tags:USAFCENT, 380th Expeditionary Civil Engineer Squadron, 380 ECES, ADAB, U.S. Air Force, USCENTCOM, AFCENT, U.S. Central Command, Air Force, CENTCOM, U.S. Air Forces Central Command, UAE, Al Dhafra Air Base, 380 AEW, 380th Air Expeditionary Wing, Power Production, Power Pro, Barrier Maintenance

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6592
RICKY A. PIERCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PEGGY JONES; DEBORAH ADLES, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-68-5-BO) Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Ricky A. Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Neil Clark Dalton, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pierce v. Jones , No. CA-94-68-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 16 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 16

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR THE UNVEILING OF FREDERICK 
              DOUGLASS STATUE.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used for an event on June 19, 2013, to unveil a 
statue of Frederick Douglass.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.

            Passed the Senate May 16, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 16

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
          for the unveiling of a statue of Frederick Douglass.
```
#### DIVERSIFIED EQUITIES, INC., a Utah corporation, and Dakal, Inc., a Utah corporation, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. AMERICAN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant and Petitioner.

No. 870343.

Supreme Court of Utah.

July 12, 1989.

Ted Boyer, H. Mifflin Williams, III, Salt Lake City, for defendant and petitioner.

Jerome H. Mooney, Arthur M. Strong, Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs and respondents.

HALL, Chief Justice:

Having heard oral arguments and having further reviewed the record and the briefs on file, it appears that certiorari was improvidently granted. The case is therefore dismissed.

STEWART, DURHAM and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice

(dissenting):

I dissent. I do not join in dismissing the writ of certiorari. No valid reason exists for doing so, and the majority expresses none. In *Israel Pagan Estate v. Capitol Thrift and Loan,*771 P.2d 1032 (Utah 1989) (Howe, Assoc. C.J., dissenting), I set out the conditions under which the United States Supreme Court dismisses writs of certiorari as having been improvidently granted and suggested that we follow its practice. None of those conditions exist here, and I decry the wasteful use of time and money of the parties, their lawyers, and this Court which dismissal promotes. I refer the reader to that opinion for a full expression of my views on this practice.
EXHIBIT 31.2  SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION  I, Michael Garff, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fresh Medical Laboratories, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Steven ErorDate: August 16, 2012Steven ErorActing Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly Report of BioPharma Manufacturing
Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Gary Riccio, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | By:    | /s/ Gary Riccio                                            
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:  | Gary Riccio                                                
| | Title: | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
| | Date:  | August 14, 2014                                            



This certification has been furnished solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned officer of Pinacle Enterprise Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2012 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/Mikhail Kats Mikhail Kats Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer  June 19, 2012
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.59 MB)

Tags:U.S. Marine Corps; People and Culture

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

100F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Whiting USA Trust II (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

| ﻿

						 

						  |   |                                                                                     |
|--------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ﻿                             |   | Whiting USA Trust II                                                      |
| ﻿                             |   |                                                                                     |
| ﻿                             | By:    | The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., |
| ﻿                             |   | as Trustee                                                                          |
| ﻿                             |   |                                                                                     |
| ﻿                             | By:    | /s/ Mike Ulrich                                                                     |
| ﻿                             |   | Mike Ulrich                                                                              |
| ﻿                             |   | Vice President                                                                      |
| ﻿                             |   |                                                                                     |

Date: May 10, 2016

﻿

----