, I 

### ° °

## ~ Offices nationwide. trinityconsultants.com 

# Tt**nt:lllty~** \JJllSU 

# tants
1120 East Sheridan, Suite 205, Oklahoma City, OK 73104 U.S.A .• (405) 228-3292 • Fax (405) 228-3293 

### December 1, 2006
Mr. Eddie Terrill Director, Air Quality Division Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality P.O. Box 1677 Oklahoma City, OK 73101-1677 

### Re: Visibility Modeling and BART Waiver Request Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. Tulsa Cement Plant
Dear Mr. Terrill: 

# RECEIVED [

# DECIl~ 7006 ] 

# AIR QUAbiTY

On behalf of the Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Lafarge), Trinity Consultants is pleased to submit this BART Wavier Request for the Tulsa Cement Plant. The Tulsa Plant has been identified as potentially subject to BART under the Regional Haze Program. Consequently, Lafarge contracted with Trinity Consultants to'determine the visibility impact of the facility on the nearby Class I Areas. The report of the modeling study is enclosed. The CALPUFF refined modeling conducted by Trinity confirms that the visibility impact is less than the 0.5 deciview threshold at Class I receptors located within 300 kilometers from the Plant. . , 

### In accordance with OAC 252: 100-8-73, Lafarge is requesting a waiver from DEQ that a BART determination for the Tulsa Cement Plant is not required. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Ms. Pamela Bennett at (918) 437-3902 ext. 271 or me at (405) 228-3292. Sincerely,

/ ..r 

### Vern Choque e Principal Consultant Encl: Visibility Modeling Report Copy: Pamela Bennett, Lafarge Building Materials, Inc.

# •



# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • • • • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# '. CALPUFF 

## BART MODELING REpORT • REFINED ANALYSIS LAFARGE BUILDING MATERIALS 

## INC.



# GE TuLSA CEMENT PLANT 

### Prepared by: Vern Choquette • Principal Consultant Don Whitney, PE • Managing Consultant Eugene Chen. PE • Senior Consultant Jeremy Townley • Consultant TRINITY CONSULTANTS 

### 120 East Sheridan Suite 205 Oklahoma City, OK 73104 (405) 228-3292
November 29, 2006 

### Project 063701.0044

# REC'El'J~-D 

# IOEC (1.1 

# 7006 

# 1 AIR 

# QUALITY


# • 

# • • • • 

# • •

# -



# • • 

# • • TABLE OF CONTENTS 

# • 

# • • 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
........................................................................................ 

### 1-1 

# • 

# • • 1.1 BACKGROUND
....................................................................................................... 

### 1-1 1.2 OBJECTIVE
............................................................................................................ 

### 1-1 

## 1.3 LOCATION OF SOURCE AND RELEVANT CLASS 

### I AREAS
....................................... 

### 1-2 

# • • 1.4 MODEL RESULTS
.................................................................................................. 

### 1-2 

## 2. CALPUFF MODELING SySTEM
......................................................................... 2-1" 2.1 MODEL VERSIONS
................................................................................................. 

### 2-1 

# • 

# • • 2.2 MODELING DOMAIN
............................................................................................. 

### 2-2 

## 3. CALMET ............................................................................................................ 3-1 

## 3.1 GEOPHYSICAL DA TA
............................................................................................. 

### 3-1 3.1.1 TERRAIN DATA
................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 LAND USE DATA
................................................................................................. 3-1 

### 3.2 METEOROLOGICAL DATA
..................................................................................... 

### 3-1 3.2.1 MESOSCALE MODEL DATA
................................................................................. 3-1 

# • • • • 

# • • 3.2.2 SURFACE DATA
................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.3 UPPER AIR DATA
................................................................................................ 3-2 3.2.4 PRECIPITATION DATA
......................................................................................... 3-2 

## 3.3 CALMET PROCESSING CONTROL
........................................................................ 

## 3-3 4. CALPUFF ........................................................................................................... 4-1 

# • 

# • • 

# • 4.1 BART-ELIGIBLE SOURCES
................................................................................... 4-1 

## 4.2 SOURCE EMISSIONS DATA
.................................................................................... 

## 4-1 

# • • 4.2.1 PM 10 EMISSIONS
.................................................................................................. 4-2 4.2.2 STACK PARAMETERS
........................................................................................... 4-3 

## 4.3 RECEYfOR LOCATIONS
.......................................................................................... 

## 4-3 4.4 BACKGROUND OZONE
.......................................................................................... 

## 4-6 4.5 BACKGROUND AMMONIA
..................................................................................... 

## 4-6 4.6 CALPUFF MODEL CONTROL PARAMETERS
........................................................ 

### 4-7 

# • • 

# • • 5. CALPOST
........................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 LIGHT EXTINCTION ALGORITHM
........................................................................... 

### 5-1 

## 5.2 CALPOST PROCESSING METHOD
......................................................................... 

## 5-1 

# • • 

# • 5.3 NATURAL BACKGROUND
...................................................................................... 

### 5-2 

## 5.4 EVALUATING BART-EXEMPTION
......................................................................... 

### 5-2 

## 5.5 SUMMARY OF CALPOST CONTROL PARAMETERS
............................................... 

### 5-2 

# • 

# • 6. MODEL RESULTS ...•......••....••....•••••.................••....•.....•...............•......•.....••.••....... 

### 6... 1 

# • 

# • Lafarge Building Ma terials Trinity Consultants 

# • • • 

# • • Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

# •

• • • 

# • • • ApPENDIX 

### A - EMISSION DATA APPENDIX 

## B - DATA FILE LIST APPENDIX 

### C - MODEL INPUT/OUTPUT FILES 

# • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • 

# • • 

# • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • • 

# • • • 

# • ii Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • • • 

# • •

# •

• • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • • • • 

# • LIST OF 

### FIGURES
TABLE 2-1. TABLE 2-2. TABLE 3-1. TABLE 4-1. TABLE 4-2. TABLE 4-3. 

# • • TABLE 4-4. TABLE 4-4. TABLE 5-1. TABLE 5-2. TABLE 5-3. TABLE 6-1. TABLE 6-2. TABLE 6-3. TABLE 6-4. 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • CALPUFF MODELING SYSTEM VERSION NUMBERS
......................................................... 2-1 VERTICAL GRID STRUCTURE
........................................................................................... 2-3 SUMMARY OF CALMET INPUTS
..................................................................................... 3-4 CONSTRUCTION DATE SUMMARY
.................................................................................. . 4-1 ESTIMATED 24-HOURAVERAGE EMISSION RATES
.................................................. : ..... . 4-2 SPECIATED PMIO EMISSIONS
........................................................................................... 4-3 POINT SOURCE STACK PARAMETERS
.............................................................................. 4-3 SUMMARY OF CALPUFF INPUTS
.................................................................................... 4-7 MONTHLY HUMIDITY FACTORS
...................................................................................... 5-1 DEFAULT AVERAGE ANNUAL NATURAL BACKGROUND LEVELS
................................... 5-2 SUMMARY OF CALPOST INPUTS
................................................................................... 5-2 VISIBLITY IMPACT MODEL RESULTS FROM CANEY CREEK 2001-03
.............................. 6-1 VISIBLITY IMPACT MODEL RESULTS FROM HERCULES-GLADES 2001-03
..................... 6-2 VISIBLITY IMPACT MODEL RESULTS FROM UPPER BUFFALO 2001-03
........................... 6-3 VISIBLITY IMPACT MODEL RESULTS FROM WICHITA MOUNTAINS 2001-03
.................. 6-4



# • iii Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • •

# •

• • • 

# • •

• 

# • • 

# • • • • • • LIST OF TABLES 

# • • • • FIGURE 1-1. LOCATION OF TULSA PLANT AND NEARBY CLASS 

### I AREAS
.......................................... 1-1 

# • FIGURE 2-1. PROPOSED MODELING DOMAIN
..................................................................................... 2-2 FIGURE 3-1. PLOT OF MODELING DOMAIN USGS TERRAIN DATA
................................................... 3-1 FIGURE 3-2. PLOT OF SURFACE STATIONS
......................................................................................... 3-2 FIGURE 3-3. PLOT OF PRECIPITATION STATIONS
................................................................................ 3-3 FIGURE 4-1. CANEY CREEK WILDERNESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
................................................... . 4-4 FIGURE 4-2. HERCULES-GLADES WILDERNESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
........................................... . 4-4 

# • • 

# • FIGURE 4-3. UPPER BUFFALO WILDERNESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
................................................ . 4-5 FIGURE 4-4. WICHITA MOUNTAINS WILDERNESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
........................................ . 4-6 

# • • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • Lafarge Building Materials IV 

### Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • •

# •



# • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • •
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

# • • 

# • • • • • 1.1 BACKGROUND On July 1, 1999, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the final Regional Haze 

# • Rule (RHR). The objective of the RHR is to improve visibility in 156 specific areas across the United States, known as Class I areas. The Clean Air Act defines Class I areas as certain national parks (over 6,000 acres), wilderness areas (over 5,000 acres), national memorial parks (over 5,000 acres), and international parks that were in existence on August 7, 1977. 

# • • • • 

# • On July 6, 2005, the EPA published amendments to its 1999 RHR, often called the BART rule, which included guidance for making source-specific Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) determinations. The BART rule defines BART-eligible sources as sources that meet the following criteria: 

# • • 

# • (1) 

### Have potential emissions of at least 250 tons per year ofa visibility-impairing pollutant, (2) Were "in existence" between August 7, 1962 and August 7, 1977, and (3) Are listed as one of the 26 listed source categories in the guidance. 

# • • • • A BART-eligible source is not automatically subject to BART. Rather, BART-eligible sources are subject-to-BART if the sources are "reasonably anticipated to cause or contribute to visibility impairment in any federal mandatory Class I area." EPA has determined that sources are reasonably anticipated to cause or contribute to visibility impairment if the visibility impacts from a source are greater than 0.5 deciviews (dv) when compared against a natural background. 

# • 

# • 

# • Air quality modeling is the tool that is used to determine a source's visibility impacts. States have the authority to exempt certain BART-eligible sources from installing BART controls if the results of the dispersion modeling demonstrate that the source cannot reasonably be anticipated to cause or contribute to visibility impairment in a Class I area. Further, states also have the authority to define the modeling procedures for conducting modeling related to making BART determinations. To promote consistency between states in the development of BART modeling protocols and to 

# • • harmonize the approaches between adjacent RPOs, the Central States Regional Air Planning (CENRAP) organization developed BARTModeling Guidelines 

### (December 15, 2005). The intent of the guidelines is to assist CENRAP states and source operators in the development of statewide and source-specific modeling protocols. 

# • 

# • • 1.2 OBJECTIVE The objective of this document is to provide a report summarizing the model results and the modeling methods and procedures that were followed by Trinity when conducting refined modeling for Lafarge Building Materials' Inc. (Lafarge) Portland Cement Plant in Tulsa, OK.
1-1 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • •

# •



# • • • • 1.3 LOCATION OF SOURCE AND RELEVANT CLASS 

## I AREAS 

# • Lafarge's Tulsa Plant is located due east of Tulsa, OK and operates as a portland cement 

# • 

# • manufacturing plant. It 

### operates two dry-process kilns that primarily consume a combination of coal and coke. Lafarge has identified the sources listed in Apperidix A at the Tulsa Plant as sources that meet the three criteria for being BART -eligible sources. These sources include: 

# •

.it. 

### Unit 221, Raw Material Grinding #2 

# • 

# • • .it. 

### Unit 222, Auxiliary Raw Material Grinding #2 .it. 

### Unit 223, Auxiliary Ra w Material Grinding #2 .it. 

### Unit 404, Kiln #2 Feed System .it. 

### Unit 502, Kiln #2 

# • • • 

# • • .it. 

### Unit 706,
. Finish Grinding #2 .it. 

### Unit 705, Finish Grinding #2 System .it. 

### Unit 704, Auxiliary Finish Grinding #2 .it. 

### Unit 602, Clinker Cooler #2 .it. 

### Unit 1101, Coal Unloading from Railcar .it. 

### Unit 1102, Coal Silo (drag conveyor and bucket elevators) .it. 

### Unit 11 03, Coal Silo (crusher) 

# • 

# • • • • A detailed summary of BART-eligibility is included in Section 4.1. Figure 1-1 provides a map ofthe location ofthe Tulsa Plant in relation to its neighboring Class I areas. As described in CENRAP's BART Modeling Guidelines, Class I areas within 300 km of the plant are included in this refined analysis. The following Class I areas fell within this 300 km radius: 

### Class I Area Name Distance from source (km) 

### Caney Creek Wilderness 247 Hercules-Glades Wilderness 258 Upper Buffalo Wilderness 213 

### Wichita Mountains National Wildlife Refuge 300 

# • • 

# • • • • • • • 1.4 MODEL RESULTS Model results from the refined analysis are included in Section 6. The tables in Section 6 indicate 

# • 

# • • that the 98 th 

### percentile visibility impairment values are below the 0.5 dv threshold at each of the four Class I areas within 300 km. As described in CENRAP's BARTModeling Guidelines 

### (December 15, 2005), these results indicate that the Lafarge Tulsa Plant is eligible for a waiver from BART requirements. 

# • 

# • 

# • • 

# • 1-2 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • • 

# • • •

# ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

FIGURE 

### 1-1. LOCATION OF TULSA PLANT AND NEARBY CLASS 

### I AREAS

Note: Tulsa Plant, CI88s I area , and domain boundary locations presented above are approximations for visual purposes and are not ex act



### 1-1 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refmed BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

# •

• • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • 

# • 2. CALPUFF MODELING SYSTEM 

# • 

# • • • The main components ofthe CALPUFF modeling system are CALMET, CALPUFF, and CALPOST. CALMET is the meteorological model that generates hourly three-dimensional meteorological fields such as wind and temperature. CALPUFF simulates the non-steady state transport, dispersion, and chemical transformation of air pollutants emitted from a source in "puffs". CALPUFF calculates 

# • 

# • hourly concentrations of visibility affecting pollutants at each specified receptor in a modeling domain. CALPOST is the post-processor for CALPUFF that computes visibility impacts from a source based on the visibility affecting pollutant concentrations that were output by CALPUFF. 

## 2.1 MODEL VERSIONS 

# • • • 

# • 

# • Earth Tech, Inc. is the primary developer of the CALPUFF modeling system and all related programs. The versions ofthe CALPUFF modeling system programs that Trinity used for Lafarge's modeling are listed in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 also compares the program versions that Trinity used with the program versions recommended by CENRAP. Note that some ofthe program versions are not the 

# • • 

# • same as the program versions recommended by CENRAP. Certain programs are being utilized in order to avoid data compatibility issues with previous versions ofthe CALPUFF sy stern. Trinity used the following software version numbers listed below. Model selection was primarily driven by a desire to utilize the most recent release of CALMET. CALPUFF and CALPOST executable versions were then selected as appropriate for compatibility.
TABLE 2-1. CALPUFF MODELING SYSTEM VERSION NUMBERS 

# • 

# '. • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# •

• 

# • • Program 

### CENRAP Suggested Version Level 

### TERREL 3.311 030709 CTGCOMP 2.42 030709 CTGPROC 2.42 030709 MAKEGEO 2.22 030709 CALMM5 2.4 050413 CALMET 5.53a 040716 CALPUFF 5.711a 040716

# POS~18 CALPOST 5.51 030709 Lafarge Refined Analysis Version Level



### 3.311 030709 2.22 030528 2.42 030709 2.22 030709 2.4 050413 6.211 060414 6.112 060412

1.4 040818 6.131 060410 Reason for Difference
Version recommended is not available

Most recent release of CALMET Use version compatible with CALMET v6.211 Use version compatible with CALPUFF 6,112



### 2-1 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

# •



# • • 

# •

• • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • •
• 

# • • • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# .' • • 

# • • • • • 

# -. • • • 

# • • 

# • 2.2 MODELING DOMAIN Trinity utilized a modeling domain that extends at least 50 km in all directions beyond the TulsaPlant and each of the fo'ur surrounding Class I areas. The map projection for the modeling domain is Lambert Conformal Conic (LCe) and the coordinate system will be North American Datum 1927 (NAD27), which is an LCC projection. The meteorological grid spacing is 3 km. The southwest corner of the modeling domain is Latitude 33.25°N, Longitude 100.5°W which was assigned as the 0,0 reference point for the domain. The northeast corner of the modeling domain is approximately Latitude 37.25°N, Longitude 92°W. At a grid spacing of3 km, the number ofX 

### grid cells is 256 and the number ofY grid cells will be 155. Figure 2-1 provides a plot of the modeling domain with respect to the sources and Class I 

### areas.

500
450
400

_ 350 

## !.**~** 300 .§ u 

### § 250 o C <3 200 

### " J:> 

### '" E .'3 150

100
50 FIGURE 2-1. PROPOSED MODELING DOMAIN



### r----------------------------------------I I m Joplin_MO Hercules-Glades 

# •
Lafarge_itulsa_PIant Ell EB Tulsa_OK Fayettevllle_AR • Upper_Buffalo**~----------------------------------** ______ I

-50 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 BOO Lambert Confonnal Conic (X) (km)


### For the purposes of this analysis, the CALMET and CALPUFF domains are identical for each analysis and are singularly referred to herein as the "domain."

2-2 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

# •



# • 

# • 

# • • • • 

# • The horizontal domain is comprised of grid cells, each containing a central grid point at which meteorological and computational parameters are calculated at each time step. For this analysis, grid spacing intervals of3 Ian are selected to resolve terrain features within the domain. Table 2-2 summarizes the vertical grid structure selected for both analyses. The cell face height of each cell indicates its vertical extent. The vertical domain is also composed of terrain-following grid cells, the 

# • 

# • • number and size of which are chosen so as to constrain the boundary layer in which dispersion and chemical trarlsformations take place. TABLE 2-2. VERTICAL GRIn STRUCTURE 

# • 

# • 

# • 

# • Cell Face Height Vertical Grid Cell (meters) 1 20 

# • • • • • 

# • 2 40 3 

### 80 4 160 

### 5 320 6 640 7 1,200 8 2,000 9 3,000 10 4,000 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • 2-3 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • 

# • 

# •

# •



# • 

# • • • 3. CALMET 

# • 

# • Trinity conducted a three-year CALMET analysis incorporating both mesoscale model and observation meteorological data to generate three years of CALMET outputs to be used as inputs to CALPUFF. The CALMET model requires the input of geophysical data, meteorological data, and 

# • 

# • • • • model parameter settings. The CALMET modeling procedures that Trinity used generally follows 

# • the recommendations in CENRAP's protocol. It 

### should be noted that Trinity used surface and precipitation data but not upper air observations in this CALMET analysis. As a result, some of 

# • CENRAP's recommendations may not apply. 

# •**~** 3.1 GEOPHYSICAL DATA CALMET requires geophysical data to characterize the terrain and land use parameters that potentially affect dispersion. Terrain features affect flows and create turbulence in the atmosphere and are potentially subjected to higher concentrations of elevated puffs. Different land uses exhibit 

# • 

# • • • variable characteristics such as surface roughness, albedo, Bowen ratio, and leaf-area index that also effect turbulence and dispersion. 

### 3.1.1 TERRAIN DATA 

# • • 

# • Trinity used terrain data obtained from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) in 1­ degree (1 :250,000 scale or approximately 90 meter resolution) digital format. A list of the 

# • USGS terrain files used in the analyses is provided in Appendix B. 

### A plot ofthe land 

# • • elevation for the modeling domain based on the referenced files is provided in Figure 3-1. 

# • 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • 3-1 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants 

# •
Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • • • •

# ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

FIGURE 

### 3-1. PLOT OF MODELING DOMAIN 

### USGS TERRAIN DATA

Longitude (degrees W) 300 200 100 

## o 800 700 600 500

Meters (Above MSL)



### 3-1 

### Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refilled BART Modeling Protocol 063701.0044

# •

• 

# • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • Trinity used the TERREL progralll to generate grid-cell elevation averages from the USGS terrain data across the modeling domain. 

### 3.1.2 LAND USE DATA 

### Trinity used USGS Composite Theme Grid (CTG) format Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) data files at I :2S0,000 resolutions. Where I :2S0,000 land use data was not available, Trinity used USGS data at I: 100,000 resolutions. A list of the USGS land use files that were used is provided in Appendix 

### B. Trinity used the CTGPROC program to generate land use for each grid cell from the LULC data across the modeling domain. Since the USGS CTG format LULC data files must be compressed prior to use in the CTGPROC utility processor, Trinity compressed the files using the program CTGCOMP. 

## 3.2 METEOROLOGICAL DATA CALMET was used to assimilate data for 2001,2002, and 2003 using mesoscale model output and National Weather Service (NWS) surface station observations, upper air station observations, and precipitation station observations to develop the meteorological field. 

### 3.2.1 MESOSCALE MODEL DATA 

### Hourly mesoscale data was used to supplement the hourly surface, upper air, and precipitation observation data. The mesoscale data was used to defme the initial guess field for the CAL MET simulations. Trinity used the following Sth generation mesoscale model meteorological data (or MMS data):

• 2001 MMS data (12 

### km resolution), • 2002 MMS data (36 

### km resolution), and • 2003 MMS data (36 

### km resolution) 

### 3.2.2 SURFACE DATA 

### The use ofmultiple stations for meteorological observations in CALMETICALPUFF provides a substantial enhancement over the steady-state treatment of observations from a single meteorological station. Parameters affecting turbulent dispersion that are observed hourly at surface stations include wind speed and direction, temperature, cloud cover and ceiling, relative humidity, and precipitation type. Surface data were extracted from among the surface stations listed in Appendix B and are illustrated in Figure 3-2. These sources were selected from the available data inventory to optimize spatial coverage and representation of the domain. Raw observations from these stations were obtained from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), quality assured and were merged using the SMERGE pre-proces sor to create a single assimilated data file of surface observations for each year analyzed. 3-3 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • • • •

### ~.

FIGURE 

### 3-2. PLOT OF SURFACE STATIONS

KTBN 

# .

.**~.** 

### 500 I<I()iAS 

# .. I<PPF**--~-** ....... 

## -- - --1

KWLI)



# . !<I.BL



# . 400 

# .**~O** 

# • KPNC Hercules-Glades 

# • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • E**~G** KHRO**~.L.P** 6**~G** 

# . KSWO 

### 2:. 

### • u c 

### 300 0 

### • () (i} KFSM I<IJK1S11K 

# .

.. E I KO.,\JN 0 

## c I I<MLC 

# 8 200 I 

# . 1::: 

# • • • 

# • • • (I)



# . ..CI Wichita_Mountainsl

### ~ E <ll**~DM** -l 

### 100 KBPS 

# . KPRX 

# . KTXK 

### • !<ELI) 

# .

__________**~_~** ______________ 1 

### L 

## o 

# • 

# • • • • • o 100 200 

### 300 400 500 600 700 800 Lambert Conformal Conic (Xl (km) 

## 3.2.3 UPPER 

### AIR DATA 

### Upper air observations were not used in this CALMET analysis (i.e., NOOBS = 

### I). 

## 3.2.4 PRECIPITATION DATA 

### The effects of chemical transfonnations and deposition processes on ambient pollutant concentrations were considered in this analysis. Therefore; it was necessary to include observations ofprecipitation in the CALMET analysis. The precipitation stations from which Trinity extracted data are listed in Appendix 

### B. The locations ofthe precipitation stations with respect to the modeling domain are shown in Figure 3-3. These stations were selected from the available data inventory to optimize spatial coverage and representation of the domain. Data from the stations were processed for use in CALMET using Version 5.31, Level 030528 of EPA's PMERGE program. 

# • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • • • • 3-4 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • • • 

# • • i<MKO KSL() 

# . .

I4AWT



# .

# •

• 

# • - -- 1 

# •



# • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 500

400 

# E .2 c: 

### 300 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • 0 () ii 

## E .s c: 

# • 

# • () 0 

### 200 1:: Q) .0 E IV ...I 

### 100



## o 

# • 

# • • • • • • 

# • FIGURE 

### 3-3. PLOT OF PRECIPITATION STATIONS**IO~l**

### ST6~VA**LE~O**

- -IMCHIT- - - - -**-€~** LOC1Mn..

- r;w!SHF

­**JO~N** M"lllJf liNG MEbICI INDEPe**Gltl!~** I**EIOng~lbs** I I Ge.!Ry**Oi<E~**

### ~O**CHI~KA** I Wichita Mountaini I**LE~GH** I CHltoR C.llNEY I

### ~~O**FOR~MA** MILLw) TEXAAK**~sv** I 

### J..cf<ss OB>1rON**FRI~CO** 

## o 100 200 300 400 

### 500 600 700 800 Lambert Conformal Conic (X) (km)


## 3.3 CALMET PROCESSING CONTROL Table 3-1 provides a listing of the CALMET parameters that Trinity used in Lafarge's modeling analysis. In 

### addition to the parameters that will be used for Lafarge's modeling, the table also lists CENRAP's recommended parameters for comparison. In cases where a parameter to be used is different than what CENRAP recommended, a short explanation as to the difference is proved. Note that most of the differences from CENRAP's recommended parameters are due to the inclusion of observation data into the modeling analysis, since CENRAP's parameters are based on a noobservation analysis. 

# • 

# • • • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • • 3-5 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

# ..,



# • • 

# • • • • TABLE 3-1. SUMMARY 

### OF CALMET INPUTS 

# • 

# • • • • • 

# • • • • • • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • • CALMET Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes NUSTA Number ofupper air data sites 0 0 Only surface and precipitation observations will be used Number of overwater data sites 0 0 IBYR Starting year 2001 Appropriate met year Years 2001, 2002, 2003 IBMO Starting month 1 Appropriate month Due to file size, analysis will be completed by month IBHR Starting hour 

### 1 1 IBTZ Base time zone 

### 6 6 IRLG Length of run 

### 6 Varies with month Due to file size, analysis will be completed by month IRTYPE Run type (I for CALPUFF) 1 

### 1 LCALGRD Compute CALFRlD data fields (T run CALGRlD) 

### F

" 

### F

!TEST Stop run after SETUP to do input QA (2 == run) 2 2

PMAP Map projection LCC LCC RLATO Latitude (decimal degrees) ofprojection origin 40N 3325N Appropriate for domain RLONO Longitude (decimal degrees) ofprojection origin 97W 100.5W Appropriate for domain XLATl Latitude of 1 st standard parallel 33N 33N Appropriate for domain XLAT2 Latitude of 2nd standard parallel 45N 40N Appropriate for domain DATUM Datum region for output coordinates WGS-G WGS-G Selected datum to match datum of land use data NX Number ofX grid cells in meteorological grid 300 256 Appropriate for domain


### 3-6 

### Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

# •

• • 

# • • • • • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • CALMET Variable Description NY Number ofY grid cells in meteorological grid DGRlDKi\1 Grid spacing (krn) XORIGKM Ref. coordinate of SW corner of grid cell YORIGKM Ref. coordinate of SW corner of grid cell NZ Number of vertical layers ZFACE Vertical cell face heights (NZ 

### + I values) LSAVE Save met. data fields in an unformatted file? IFORMO Type of unformatted output file (I for CALPUFF) LPRINT Print met. fields IPRINF Print intervals IUVOUT(NZ) SpecifY layers ofu,v wind components to print IWOUT(NZ) SpecifY layers ofw wind component to print ITOUT(NZ) SpecifY layers of 3D temperature field to print LOB Print met data and variables 

### NNI First time step for debug data to be printed 

### NN2 Last time step for debug data to be printed IOUTD Control variable for Value Included in CENRAP Protocol 

### 192

6.0 -1008

0.0

10 0, 20, 40, 80, 160, 320,640,1200,2000, 3000,4000
T

I

F I NZ*O

NZ*O

NZ*O

F 1



### 1

0 Value Trinity Used



### 155

3.0 0

0


### 10 0, 20, 40, 80, 160, 320, 640,

1200,2000, 3000,4000 T

I

F I NZ*O

NZ*O

NZ*O

F 1



### 2

0 Notes Appropriate for domain Refined grid spacing Appropriate for domain Appropriate for domain

Will generate debug data for a total of 

### 2 time steps 

### 3-7 

# • • 

# • • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • • • Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • • 

# • •

# •

• • • 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • CALMET Variable 

# ..

Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes writing test/debug wind fields NZPRN2 Number of levels starting at surface to print 0 1 Default

IPRO Print interpolated wind components 0 0 IPRI Print terrain adjusted surface wind components 0 0

IPR2 Print initial divergence fields 0 0 IPRJ Print final wind speed and direction 0 0 IPR4 Print final divergence fields 0 0 IPR5 Print winds after kinematic effects 0 0 IPR6 Print winds after Froude number adjustment 0 0

IPR7 Print winds after slope flows are added 0 0 IPR8 Print final wind field components 0 0 NOOBS No observation mode 

### (2 No surface, overwater, or upper air observations; use MM5 for surface, overwater, and upper air data) 

### 2 1 Will use surface and precipitation observations

NSSTA Number of meteorological stations in SURFDAT file 0 47 Number of stations

NPSTA Number of precipitation stations in PRECIP.DAT file 0 135 Number of stations

ICLOUD Gridded cloud fields (0 =: no, 3 Gridded cloud cover from prognostic relative 3 3 

# • • 

# • 3-8 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refmed BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

:. .. ':" 

# • •

# •



# • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • 

# • •
• 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# •

• 

# • • 

# • • 

# • CALMET V,ri,bl,

# k~Ption Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes IFORMS Fonnat of surface data (2 = fonnatted) 2 2 IFORMP Forrnatof precipitation data (2 

### = fonnatted) 2 2

IFORMC Fonnat of cloud data (2 

### = fonnatted) 2 

### 1 NI A - No cloud data used in model IWFCOD Generate winds by diagnostic wind module? (1 

### = yes) 

### 1 1

IFRADJ Adjust winds using Froude number effects? (1 

### = yes) 1 1

IKINE Adjust winds using kinematic effects? (0
= no) 0 1 Will compute kinematic effects in this analysis IOBR Use O'Brien procedure for vertical winds? (0 = no) 0 0

ISLOPE Compute slope flows? (1 = yes) 1 

### 1 IEXTRP Extrapolate surface winds to upper layers 

### (-I 

### = no extrapolation and ignore layer 1 of upper air station data) -1 -1

ICALM Extrapolate surface winds even ifcalm? (0 = no) 0 0

BIAS Layer dependent biases weighting aloft measurements 0, 0, 0, 0,0,0, 0, 0, 0, 0 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,0,0,0 RMIN2 Minimum vertical extrapolation distance Distance (km) around an upper air site where vertical extrapolation is excluded (set to -1 if IEXTRP=±4) -1 -1

IPROG Using prognostic or 14 14 

# • 

# • 3-9 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • • • e,

# •

• • 

# • • 

# • • • • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • CALMET Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes MM-FDDA data? (14 

### = Use winds from MM5.DAT as initial guess wind field) ISTEPPG Timestep (hours) of the MM5 data 1 1 LVARY Use varying radius of influence to develop surface winds? T T Use FLAG default

RMAXI Maximum radius of influence over land in surface layer (lan) 30 100 As included in IWAQM Phase 2 case study RMAX2 Maximum radius of influence over land aloft (Ian) 30 500 As included in IWAQM Phase 2 case study RMAX3 Maximum radius of influence over water (Ian) 50 36 Same as MM5 data spacing RMIN Minimum radius of influence used anywhere (lan) 0.1 0.1

TERRAD Radius of influence of terrain features (km) 12 

### 12

Rl Weighting of first guess surface field (lan) 1 50 As included in IWAQM Phase 2 case study R2 Weighting of first guess aloft field (Ian) 1 100 As included in IWAQM Phase 2 case study RPROG MM5 windfield weighting parameter (lan) 0 0

DIVLIM Maximum acceptable divergence 5.E-6 5.E-6 NITER Max number of passes in divergence minimization 50 50

NSMTH


# • Number ofpasses through smoothing filter in each layer of CALMET(NZ values) 2,4,4,4,4,4,4 2,4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4,4,4,4

;. 

# • • 

# • 3-10 

### Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refmed BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# •

# •



# • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • CALMET Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes NITR2 Max number of stations used in each layer for the interpolation of data to a grid point (NZ values) 

### 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5 5,5,5,5,5,5, 5,5,5,5

CRlTFM Critical Froude number LO 1.0 ALPHA Kinematic effects parameter 0.1 O.l FEXTR2 Scaling factor for extrapolating surface winds aloft NZ*O.O NZ*O.O

NBAR Number of terrain barriers 0 0 IDIOTPI Compute temperature from observations (0
= true) 0 0

ISURFT Surface station to use for surface temperature (between I and NSSTA) 4 4

-
IDIOPT2 Domain-averaged wind component switch 0 0

IUPT Station for lapse rates (between I and NUSTA) 2 2

ZUPT Depth through which lapse rate is calculated 200 200

IDIOPT3 Domain averaged wind component switch 0 0

IUPWND Upper air station for domain winds -1 -1 ZUPWND Bottom and top of layer through which the domain scale winds are computed 1., 1000. 1.,1000.

IDIOPT4 Observed surface wind component switch 0 0 

# • • • • • 3-11 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refmed BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

!'--.'- •. 

# • •

# •



# • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • • • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • • • Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refmed BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 CALMET Variable Description IDIOPT5 Observed aloft wind component switch LLBREZE Use lake breeze module? NBOX Number oflake breeze regions NLB Number of stations in the region METBXID(NLB) Station IDs in the region CONSTB Neutral stability mixing height coefficient CONSTE Convective stability mixing height coefficient CONSTN Stable stability mixing height coefficient CONSTW Overwater mixing height coefficient FCORIOL Absolute value of Coriolis parameter IAVEZI Conduct spatial averaging? (1 

### = yes) MNMDAV Max search radius in averaging process Jnumber of grid cells) HAFANG Half-angle of upwind looking cone for averaging (degrees) ILEVZI Layers of wind use in upwind averaging (between 1 and NZ) DPTMIN Minimum potential temperature lapse rate in the stable layer above the current convective mixing height DZZI Depth of layer above current convective mixing height Value Included in CENRAP Protocol 0 F 0 0 0 1.41

0.15

2400

0.l6 l.E-4

1 10

30

1

0.001

200



### 3-12 Value Trinity Used

0 F 0 0 0 1.41

0.l5

2400

0.16 l.E-4

1 10

30

1

0.001

200 Notes



# • •

·**,~.~.L",;** ......

# •



# • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# .' • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • CALMET Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes through which lapse rate is computed (m) ZIMIN Minimum overland mixing height (m) 50 50 ZIMAX Maximum overland mixing height (m) 3000 3000 ZIMINW Minimum overwater mixing height (m) 50 50 ZIMAXW Maximum overwater missing height (m) 3000 3000 ITPROG 3D temperature from observations or from MM5? 2 1 Will use surface observations and precipitation data lRAD Type of interpolation (l 

### = lIr) 1 1 TRADKM Temperature interpolation radius of influence (km) 36 36

NUMTS Max number of stations for temperature interpolations 5 5

IAVET Spatially average temperature? (1 

### = yes) 

### 1 1

TGDEFB Temperature gradient below the mixing height over water (Kim) -.0098 -0.0098

TGDEFA Temperature gradient above the mixing height over water (KIm) -.0045 -0.0045

JWATl Beginning land use categories over water 55 55

JWAT2 Ending land use categories for water 55 55

NFLAGP Precipitation interpolation flag (2 

### IIr) 2 2

SIGMAP 

# • • Radius of influence 50 50 

# • • 3-13 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants 

# • Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

# •

• 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • Value Included in 

# • • • Value Trinity CALMET Variable Description CENRAP Protocol Notes for precipitation interpolation (km) Used 

# • • CUTP Minimum 0.01 precipitation rate cut off(mmIhr) 0.01 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# •

• • • • 

# • • 

# • • 3-14 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refmed BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • •

# •



# • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# ­ 4. CALPUFF
Trinity conducted a three-year CAL PUFF analysis. The CALPUFF model requires the input of meteorological data output by CALMET, source emissions data, receptor data, ozone and ammonia data, and model parameter settings. 

## 4.1 BART-ELIGIBLE SOURCES As a Portland Cement plant, the Tulsa Plant is considered BART-eligible. In order to determine what specific units constitute the "BART-eligible" source, the construction dates of the each of the plant's units must be examined. A list ofthose units that were "in existence" within the 15-year BART window (7 August 1962-1977) is provided below. TABLE 4-1. CONSTRUCTION DATE SUMMARY 

### Unit No. Point ID Description Construction Date 221 EP04 #2 discharge chute, separator, bucket elev. 1964 222 EP05 Raw mill pump hopper 1964 223 EP05 Raw mill pump hopper 1964 404 EP13 Kiln #2 feed system 1964 502 EP15 Kiln No.2, screw conveyors, & 

### ,bucket elev. 1964 706 EP24 #2 bucket elev. and separator 1964 705 EP26 Finish mill #2 1964 704 EP25 Finish mill #2 feed belt 1964 602 EP17 Clinker cooler #2 1964 1101 EP27 Coallcoak unloading 1974 1102 EP28 Coallcoak drag conveyor, bucket elev., crusher 1974 1I03 EP28 Coallcoak drag conveyor, bucket elev., crusher 1974


## 4.2 SOURCE EMISSIONS DATA Trinity included emissions of80 2, 

### NO", and PM 10 

### in the model. For source-specific analyses, CENRAP has suggested several sources of emission data in the following priority:l

.. Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) data, for period 2001-03

.. CEM data for 2002

.. Actual 2002 emission rates in state emission inventories

.. Emission factors from AP-42 source profiles

.. Permit allowable emissions, or

.. Potential to emit

1 CENRAP BARTModeling Guidelines, p. 7-1. 

# • 

# • • 4-1 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • •

# •



# • 

# • • 

# • -- --

-- --



# -- 

# --

-- 

# --

-- 

# --

-- 

# --

-- 

# --

-- -- 

# • • • 

# • CEMS data over the 2001-03 time period is not available (as the Tulsa Plant does not operate with CEMS units), so model emissions are primarily based on emission factors and maximum 24-hour production rates. A detailed summary of emission rates and source data is included in Appendix A. 

# • • 

# • 

# • Table 4-2 provides a brief summary ofthese emission rates. Emissions were calculated using either AP-42 emission factors or baghouse manufacturer emission data. Based upon reported annual hours of operation from 2001-2005, it is reasonable to assume that each of these units operated continuously over a single 24-hour period. As a result, emissions are calculated based upon a full 24 hours of operation. In addition, emissions were based on the maximum achievable production rate (or heat 

# • • 

# • • duty in the case of combustion units) over a one hour period. TABLE 4-2. ESTIMATED 24-HOUR AVERAGE EMISSION RATES 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • Unit ID 

# v.

NO. PM 10 S02 

### Ibslhr Ibslhr Ibslhr EP04 0.089 3.857 0.001 EP05 0.429 EPl3 0.557 EP15 576.00 17.143 960.00 EP24 3.402 EP26 0.429 EP25 0.429 EP17 4.607 EP27 0.375 EP28 0.321


### 4.2.1 PMio EMISSIONS 

# • 

# • 

# • • • • PM lO 

### emissions are not directly entered into the model but are instead speciated out into its smaller constituents. The PM 10 

### emissions from the kiln are speciated according to the Federal Land 

# • Managers' guidance to include the following: 2 • 3 

# • 

# • • Coarse particulate matter (PMc, considered PM 25• l0 ) 

### • Fine particulate matter (PM F , 

### considered PM<2.s) • Sulfates (S04) • Secondary organic aerosols (SOA) • Elemental carbon (EC) Based upon FLM guidance, PM IO 

### emissions from natural gas combustion consists of primarily coarse (25%) and fine (75%) particulate matter and emissions from fabric filters consists of primarily coarse (70%) and fine (30%). A summary of speciated PM 10 

### emissions is presented in Table 4-3. Full 

# • details of PM 10 

### speciation can be found in Appendix A.

2 http://www2.nature.nps.gov/airlPennits/ectlectCementKiln.cfin J As recommended by Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS). 

# • 

# • • 

# • • 4-2 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • 

# •

# •

• 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# •

• • 

# • 

# ".

• • • • 

# • • • •

4.2.2 

# - Unit ID EP04 EP05 EP13 EP15 EP24 EP26 EP25 EP17 EP27 EP28 TABLE 4-3. SPECIATED PMIO EMISSIONS


### PM (coarse) PM (fine) S04 SOA 

### EC Ibslbr Ibslbr Ibslhr Ibslbr Ibslhr 0.964 2.893 

# -- -- -­ 0.300 0.129 

# -- -- -­ 0.390 0.167 

# -- -- 

# -­ 1.149 1.320 12.91 1.766 

# -­ 2.381 1.021 

# -- -- 

# -­ 0.300 0.129 

# -- 

# -- -­ 0.300 0.129 

# -- -- 

# -­ 3.225 1.382 

# -- 

# -- -­ 0.263 0.113 

# -- 

# -- -­ 0.225 0.096 

# -- -- -­

• STACK PARAMETERS 

# • • 

# • Table 4-4 provides a summary of source exhaust parameters. TABLE 4-4. POINT SOURCE STACK PARAMETERS 

# • • 

# • • • • Emission Latitude Longitude Base Exit Stack Stack Exit unit (degrees) (degrees) Elevation Velocity Height Diameter Temperature (m) (ftls) 

### (feet) (feet) (Fahrenheit) EP04 36.194777 95.811055 267 11.94 100 4 180 EP05 36.19475 95.810722 250 8.29 55 1.6 70 EP13 36.195472 95.811916 259 9.55 97 1.7 200 EPl5 36.195833 95.811777 234 17.83 60 6.9 500 EP24 36.19425 95.811222 271 10.53 100 4 200 EP26 36.194166 95.811166 260 33.16 64 0.8 70 EP25 36.194166 95.811166 258 33.16 55 0.8 200 EP17 36.19375 95.811805 240 3.56 53 8.0 200 EP27 36.194027 95.811027 230 4.64 7 2.0 70 EP28 36.194138 95.811333 245 4.91 135 1.8 70 

# • • • • • Base elevations are based upon visual inspection of USGS topographic maps, while source locations are based upon site inspections performed by Lafarge personnel. 

## 4.3 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS 

# • 

# • 

# • The National Park Service (NPS) has electronic files for each Class I area available on their website containing the locations and elevations of discrete Class I area receptors. The receptor files for Caney Creek Wilderness, Hercules-Glades Wilderness, Upper Buffalo Wilderness, and Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge were downloaded from the NPS we bsite, converted into the LCC NAD27 projection, 4-3 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants 

# • • 

# • Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • 

# •

# •



# • • 

# • • 

# .. and incorporated into the CALPUFF model. Receptor locations for these Class I areas are shown in Figures 4-1 to 4-4. FIGURE 

### 4-1. CANEY CREEK WILDERNESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
CanBY C{i!tkWildomess aD ReeeplCfS U SFS BQlJnl3arl' SOI.Hte:

FS NaticM! C**o\l~rage** tl.:l: NR 'S

- ALP group Corvalli'9. OR August 22,2003



# . • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • .. 

# .. 

# .. .. '"

,. 

# .. .. 

# .. .. 

# .. .. 

# • • '



# .. 

# .. • 

# .. ..**~**



# .. .. 

# .. .. .. .. • 

# L"
.. · .. ..

FIGURE 

### 4-2. HERCULES-GLADES WILDERNESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS 

# • • • 

# • 

# • •**~**

.. 

# • • • 

# • 

# • .. 

# • • • .. 

# .. ..



# .. .. 

# • •

.. .. .. .. 

# ..

.. 

# • 

# • 

# • 

# . • '



# .. Hercules-Glades**W~d.rness** 60 Receptors 

# - USFS Boundary Source: FS National Coverage ule: NIlIS - I4..P grQup


# .. COIII.llis. OR August 22.2003



# - • 4-4 

### Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • •

# •

• •



# • •



# • 

# • 

# ., • 

# • • 

# • • • • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# .' • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • 

# • • 

# • 

# • 

# • • • • 

# • • FIGURE 

### 4-3. UPPER BUFFALO WILDERNESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS



# .. Upper Buffalo Wilderness 72 Re ce ptors USFS Boundary Source:

FS National Coverage file: NRIS - ALP group Corvallis, OR Aug us! 22,2003



### 4-5 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 

### 063701.0044

# •



# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • 

# .. • 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • • • 

# • •
• 

# • • Ct FIGURE 

### 4-4. WICHITA MOUNTAINS WILDERl'JESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS Wichita MountainsWilderness ;;.ithin Wichita MountainsNWR 59 Receptors FWS Wilderness Boundary S.urce:

Region 2 GIS 500 Gold Ave., SW PO S•• 1306 Albuquerque, NM 87103 fWS ;JWR Boundary Source:

htlp:llwwwJws.govldatalr2gislboundary.hlml Septem ber 18, 2003 

# · 

# . 

# . . . 

# . 

# . 

# · .. .,. 

# . ,. 

# . ..



# ·1
· • 

# .! 

# .. :-:l

+



## 4.4 BACKGROUND OZONE 

### Background ozone concentrations are required in order to model the photochemical conversion of S02 and NO" to sulfates (SO

## J and nitrates (N03)' CALPUFF can use either a single background value representative of an area or hourly ozone data from one or more ozone monitoring stations. CENRAP recommends either developing background ozone estimates from ambient monitors located within the particular domain being modeled or**de~eloping** 

### background ozone estimates from CENRAP's most recent CMAQ or CAMx simulation for the 2002 

### base year. Trinity used a conservative value of 40 ppb (as recommended in CENRAP protocol Appendix) in lieu ofthe CENRAP recommendation. 

## 4.5 BACKGROUND AMMONIA 

### Background ammonia concentrations are required to model the formation of ammonium sulfates and ammonium nitrates. CENRAP recommends developing background ammonia estimates from CENRAP's most recent CMAQ or CAMx simulation for the 2002 

### base year. Since 

### CMAQ/CAMx modeled and observed monthly averaged ammonia concentrations exhibit wide spatial variability, CENRAP recommends obtaining separate monthly-averaged ammonia concentrations from CMAQ or CAMx for the CENRAP north, central and south modeling domains, respectively. These would then be used as input toCALPUFF. Since the data from CENRAP's CMAQ and CAMx simulations is not readily available, Trinity used a conservative monthly background concentration of 3 

### ppb. This 4-6 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

# •

• 

# • • 

# • •


# • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • 

# ..

background concentration is the value included in CENRAP's protocol as a default background value for the CENRAP region. 

## 4.6 CALPUFF MODEL CONTROL PARAMETERS 

# • 

# • • 

# • • • 4' 

# -

• 

# •

• 

# • • • Table 

### 4-4 provides a listing ofthe CALPUFF parameters that Trinity used in Lafarge's modeling analysis. In addition to the parameters used for Lafarge's modeling, the table also lists CENRAP's recommended parameters for comparison. In cases where a parameter is different than what CENRAP recommended, a short explanation as to the difference is provided. TABLE 4-4. SUMMARY OF CALPUFF INPUTS CALPUFF

Variable Description METRUN All model periods in met files will be run IBYR Starting year IBMO Starting month IBDY Starting day IBHR Starting hour XBTZ Base time zone (6


## = CST) IRLG Length of run NSPEC Number of MESOPUFF II chemical species NSE Number of chemical species to be emitted ITEST Program is executed after SETUP phase MRESTART Do not read or write a restart file during run NRESPD File written only at last period METFM CAL MET binary file (CALMET.MET) AVET Averaging time in minutes PGTlME PG Averaging Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used 0 0

2001 Appropriate met year 1 I I I 

### 1 1 6 6 8760 8760 10 10

8 6

2 2

0 0

0 0 1 1

60 60 60 60 Notes

Years 2001, 2002, 2003

S02, S04, NOx, PMC, PMF, SOA



### 4-7 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 

### 063701.0044

# •

•



# • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • 

# . . • '

' 

# • • • it 

# • • 

# • 

# • 

# • 

# .' • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • 

# • • • • • •

• 

# • CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes time in minutes MGAUSS Gaussian distribution used in near field 1 1

MCTADJ Partial plume path terrain adjustment 

### 3 3 MCTSG Sub-grid-scale complex terrain not modeled 0 0

MSLUG Near-field puffs not modeled as elongated 0 0

MTRANS Transitional plume rise modeled 1 1 MTIP Stack tip downwash used 1 1 MSHEAR (0,1) Vertical wind shear (not modeled, modeled) 0 0

MSPLIT Puffs are not split 0 1 Allowed for puff splitting due to significant sourcereceptor distances MCHEM MESOPUFF II chemical parameterization scheme 1 1

MAQCHEM Aqueous phase transformation not modeled 0 0

MWET Wet removal modeled 1 1 MDRY Dry deposition modeled 1 1 MDlSP PG dispersion coefficients 

### 3 

### ,., .J MTURBVW Use both 

### a v and 

### a w from PROFILE.DAT to compute 

### a y and 

### a, (n/a) 

### 3 

### ,., .J

MDlSP2 

# • 

# • PG dispersion 

### 3 3 

# • 

# • • 4-8 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

# •

• • 

# • •


# • 

# • • 

# .' • 

# • 

# • • 

# • •
• 

# • • • (e' 

# • • 

# '. .' • 

# • • •
• • 

# • 

# '. • 

# • • 

# • 

# •

• • • • 4-9 CALPUFF

Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes coefficients MROUGH PG cry and cr z not adjusted for roughness 0 0

MPARTL No partial plume penetration of elevated inversion 1 1

MTINV Strength of temperature inversion computed from default gradients 0 0

MPDF PDF not used for dispersion under convective conditions 0 0

MSGTIBL Sub-grid TIBL module not used for shoreline 0 0

MBCON Boundary concentration conditions not modeled 0 0

MFOG Do not configure for FOG model output 0 0

MREG Technical options must conform to USEPA Long Range Transport (LRT) guidance 1 1

CSPEC 

### CENRAP Lafarge Output Group Species Modeled Emitted Dry Deposition Output Group Species Modeled Emitted Dry Deposition S02 1 1 1 S02 1 1 1 S04 1 0 2 S04 1 1 2 

### NOX 1 1 1 

### NOX 1 1 1 HN03 1 0 1 HN03 1 0 1 N03 1 0 2 N03 1 0 2 NH3 1 1 1 NH3 1 0 1 PMC 1 1 2 PMC 1 1 2 PMF 1 1 2 PMF 1 1 2 

### Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants 

# • 

# • 

# • Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

# •



# • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# •**.~** 

# •

• 

# • • • • 

# • «I


# • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes

# ~ Map projection 12 EC 

# I 1 0 12 

# -+ 12 SOA 1 1 I 12 PMAP UTM LCC NX Number of X grid cells in meteorological grid 66 256 Based on refined grid parameters as specified in CALMETruns NY Number of Y grid cells in meteorological grid 66 155 Based on refined grid parameters as specified in CALMETruns NZ Number of vertical layers in meteorological grid 10 10

DGRIDKM Grid spacing (km) 6 3.0 Refined grid size ZFACE Cell face heights in meteorological grid (m) 0,20, 40, 80, 160, 320,640,1200,2000, 

## I 3000,4000 0,20,40,80,160, 320,640, 1200, 2000,3000,4000 XORIGKM Reference X coordinate for SW comer ofgrid cell of meteorological grid (km) 5 0 Appropriate for domain (refined grid)

YORIGKM Reference Y coordinate for SW comer of grid cell of meteorological grid (km) 3327 0 Appropriate for domain (refined grid)

IUTMZN UTM zone of coordinates (NAD83)(use only if PMAP=UTM) 12 14 N/A;LCC coordinates used

IBCOMP X index of lower left comer ofthe computational grid 1 1

JBCOMP Y index oflower left comer ofthe computational grids 

### 1 1

IECOMP X index ofupper right comer ofthe 66 256 Appropriate for domain (refined grid) 

### Lafarge Building Materials 

### Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 

### 063701.0044 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • •

# •

• 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • • • • 

# .'
• • 

# • •
• 

# • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • • • • • • • • CAL PUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes computational grid JECOMP Y index ofupper right comer ofthe computational grid 

### 66 155 Appropriate for domain (refined grid) LSAMP Sampling grid is not used F IF IBSAMP X index of lower left comer of sampling grid 

### 1 1

JBSAMP Y index oflower left comer of sampling !!rid 

### 1 I

IESAMP X index of upper right comer of sampling grid 

### 66 256 Appropriate for domain (refined grid) JESAMP Y index ofupper right comer of sampling grid 

### 66 155 Appropriate for domain (refined grid) MESHDN Nesting factor of sampling grid I 1 ICON Output file CONC.DAT containing concentrations is created I 

### 1

IDRY Output file DFLX.DAT containing 

### dry fluxes is created I 1

IWET Output file WFLX.DAT containing wet fluxes is created 1 

### 1

(VIS Output file containing relative humidity data is created 

### 1 1

LCOMPRS Perform data compression in output file T T

IMFLX


# • 

# • Do not calculate mass fluzes across specific boundaries 

### 0 0 

# • 

# • • 4-11 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

# •

• • • • 

# • • • • 

# • 

# • • • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • • CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes IMBAL Mass balances for each species not reported hourly 0 0

ICPRT Print concentration fields to output list file 1 1

IDPRT Do not print dry flux fields to output list file 0 0

IWPRT Do not print wet flux fields to output list fil e 0 0
ICFRQ Concentration fields are printed to output list file every hour 1 1

IDFRQ Dry flux fields are printed to output list file every 1 hour 

### 1 1

IWFRQ Wet flux fields are printed to output list file every 1 hour 1 1

IPRTU Units for line printer output are in g/mJ for concentration and g/m2/s for deposition 

### 3 3

IMESG Messages tracking the progress of run written to screen 2 2

LDEBUG Logical value for debug output F F IPFDEB First puff to track 1 1 y NPFDEB Number of puffs 1 1 NNI Meteorological period to start output 1 1 NN2 Meteorological period to end output 10 10



### 4-12 

# • 

# • • Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 

### 063701.0044 

# • • 

# • •

# •



# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • • 

# • CALPUFF Variable 

# •

Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes NHILL Number ofterrain features 

### 0 0 NCTREC Number of special complex terrain receptors 

### 0 0

MHILL Input terrain and receptor data for CTSG hills input in CTDM format 2 2

XHILL2M Conversion factor for changing horizontal dimensions to meters 1 1

ZHILL2M Conversion factor for changing vertical dimensions to meters 1 1

XCTDMKM X origin of CTDM system relative to CALPUFF coordinate system (km) 

### 0 0

YCTDMKM Y origin ofCTDM system relative to CALPUFF coordinate system (Ian) 

### 0 0

S02 Diffusivity 0.1509 0.1509 Alpha star 

### 1000 1000 Reactivity 

### 8 8 Mesophyll resistance 

### 0 0 Henry's Law coefficient 0.04 0.04 NOX Diffusivity 0.1656 0.1656 Alpha star 1 1 Reactivity 

### 8 8 Mesophyll resistance 5 5 

# • 

# • • 

# • Henry's Law coefficient 3.5 3.5


### 4-13 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# •CALPUFF Variable Description HN03 Diffusivity Alpha star Reactivity Mesophyll resistance Henry's Law coefficient S04-2 Geomatric mass mean diameter of S04-2 (flm) N03­ Geometric mass mean diameter of N03- ().tm) PMC Geometric mass mean diameter of PMC (flm) PMF Geometric mass mean diameter of PMF (flm) EC Geometric mass mean diameter of EC (flm) SOA Geometric mass mean diameter of SOA (flm) RCUTR Reference cuticle resistance (stcm) RGR Reference ground resistance (stcm) REACTR Reference pollutant reactivity NINT Number of particle size intervals for effective particle deposition velocity IVEG Vegetation in nonirregated areas is active and unstressed S02 Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (S'I) Value Included in CENRAP Protocol 0.1628 1 18 0 8.e-8 0.48

0.48

6

0.48

0.48

0.48

30 

### 10 8 9

1

3.21E-05 Value Trinity Used 0.1628 1 18 0 8.0e-8 0.48

0.48

6

0.48

0.48

0.48

30 10 8 9

1

3.21E-05 Notes



### 4-14 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • 

# • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 

# • • • • • • • • • • 

# • • •

# •

• • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • • 

# • 

# • • • • • • • • • • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • 

# • • • • • • 

# • CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (5. 1) 0 0

S04-2 Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (5. 1 ) l.OE-04 1.0E-04

Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (5. 1) 3.0E-05 3.0E-05

HN03 Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (5. 1) 6.0E-05 6.0E-05

Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (5. 1) 0 0

N03­ Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (5. 1) l.OE-04 l.OE-04

Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (S'l) 3.0E-05 3.0E-05

NH3 Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (5. 1) 8.0E-05 NA

Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (S·I) 0 NA

PMC Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (5. 1 ) 1.0E-4 1.0E-4



# • 

# • • Scavenging coefficient for frozen 3.0E-05 3.0E-05 

# • 

# • 4-15 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity 

### Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

# •

• • • • • 

# • • • • • • • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • CALPUFF Variable Description precipitation (s") PMF Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (s") Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (s") EC Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (S·I) Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (S·I) OC Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (S·I) Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (s") MOZ Read ozone background concentrations from ozone.dat file (measured values) BCK03 Background ozone concentration (ppb) BCKNH3 Background ammonia concentration (ppb) RNITEI Nighttime S02 loss rate is o/olhour Nightti"'" NOX loss rate is %/hour Nighttime HN03 loss rate is o/olhour Value Included in CENRAP Protocol I.OE-05

3.0E-05

1.0E-04

3.0E-05

I.OE-04

3.0E-05

1

12*40

12*3

0.2 2 2 Value Trinity Used I.OE-04

3.0E-05

I.OE-04

3.0E-05

I.OE-04

3.0E-05

1

12*40

12*3

0.2 2 2 Notes



### 4-16 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 

### 063701.0044

# •



# • •

• 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • • • • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • • • CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes MH202 Background H202 concentrations I 0 Need to choose 0 in order to use monthly background value BCKH202 Background monthly H202 concentrations 

### 1 12*1

BCKPMF Fine particulate concentration for SOAoption (llg/ m3 ) 1 1

OFRAC Organic fraction of fine particulate for SOA option .2 0.15,0.15,0.2,0.2,0.2, 0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2, 0.2,0.15 Irrelevant, since MCHEM not equal to 4 VCNX VOC/NOX ratio for SOA option 50 50 SYTDEP Horizontal size of a puff in meters beyond which the time dependant dispersion equation ofHeffter is used 550 550

MHFTSZ Do not use Heffter formulas for sigma z 0 0

JSUP Stability class used to determine dispersion rates for puffs above boundary layer 5 5

CONK I Vertical dispersion constant for stable conditions 0.01 

# om

CONK2 Vertical dispersion constant for neutral/stable conditions 0.1 0.1

TBD Use ISC transition point for determining the transition point between the Schulman-Scire to 0.5 0.5 

# • • • 

# • 4-17 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • 

# •

# •



# • • • • 

# • • 

# • ., 

# • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • 

# • •

• 

# • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • • 

# • • CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes Huber-Snyder Building Downwash scheme IURBI Lower range of land use categories for which urban dispersion is assumed 10 10

IURB2 Upper range of land use categories for which urban dispersion is assumed 19 19

ILANDUIN Land use category for modeling domain 

## * *

XLAIIN Leaf area index for modeling domain 

## * * ZOIN Roughness length in meters for modeling domain 

## * *

ELEVIN Elevation above sea level 

## * * XLATIN North latitude of station in degrees 

## - 

# - XLONIN South latitude of station in degrees 

# . . ANEMHT Anemometer height in meters 10 10 ISIGMAV Sigma-v is read for lateral turbulence data 1 1

IMIXCTDM Predicted mixing heights are used 0 0 XMXLEN Maximum length of emitted slug in meteorological grid units 1 1

XSAMLEN Maximum travel distance of slug or puffin meteorological 10 10



### 4-18 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 

### 063701.0044

# •

• 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • • • CALPUFF Variable Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes grid units one sampi

# [)e""~ MXNEW Maximum number of puffs or slugs released from one source during one time step 60 60

MXSAM Maximum number of sampling steps during one time step for a puff or slug 60 60

NCOUNT Number of iterations used when computing the transport wind for a sampling step that includes transitional plume rise 2 2

SYMIN Minimum sigma y in meters for a new puff or slug 1 1

SZMIN Minimum sigma z in meters for a new puff or slug 1 1

SVMIN Minimum lateral turbulence velocities (mls) 0.5 0.5

SWMIN Minimum vertical turbulence velocities (mls) 0.20,0.12, 0.08, 0.06, 0.03,0.016 0.20,0.12,0.08, 0.06,0.03,0.016 WSCALM Minimum noncalm wind speeds (mls) 0.5 0.5

XMAXZI Maximummi height (m) 3000 3000 XMlNZI Minimummi' height(m) 20 20 SL2PF Maxmium cry/puff length 10 10 PLXO Wind speed power-law 0.07,0.07,0.10,0.15, 0.35; 0.55 0.07, 0.Q7, 0.10, 0.15,0.35,0.55 

### 4-19 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • 

# • • 

# • 

# • •

# •



# • • 

# • •


# • • • • 

# • • • • • • • • 

# • • • 

# •



# • • 

# • • • 

# • •


# • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • CAL PUFF Variable 

# •

" Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes exponents WSCAT Upper bounds of 1 st 5 wind speed classes 1.54,3.09,5.14,8.23, 10.80 1.54,3.09,5.14, 8.23,10.80 PTGO Potential temp gradients PG E & F (deg/km) 0.020, 0.035 0.020,0.035

CDIV Divergence criterion for dw/dz (lIs) 0.01 0.01

PPC Plume path coefficients (only if MCTADJ = 3) . 0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5, 0.35,0.35 0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5, 0.35,0.35 NSPLIT Number of puffs when split 3 3 IRE SPLIT Hours when puff is eligible to split 1900 Hour 17 Should be by hour of day

- 1900 is hour 17 ZISPLIT Previous hours minimum mixing height, m 100 100

ROLDMAX Previous max mixing height/current height ratio, must be less than this value to allow puff to split 0.25 0.25

NSPLITH Number of puffs resulting from a split 5 5

SYSPLITH Minimum sigma-y of puff before it may split 1.0 1.0

SHSPLITH Minimum puff elongation rate from wind shear before puff may split 2.0 2.0

CNSPLITH Minimum species concentration before a pluff may split 1.0E-07 1.0E-07

EPSSLUG Criterion for 1.0E-04 1.0E-04 

# • 4-20 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • • 

# • •

# •

• • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • • 

# • • • • • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes SLUG sampling EPSAREA Criterion for area source integration 1.0E-06 I.OE-06 DSRISE Trajectory step length for numerical site algorithm 1.0 1.0

NPTl Number of point sources with constant stack parameters or variable emission rate scale factors Varies by scenario 10 Appropriate for Lafarge

IPTU Units for point source emission rates are gls 

### 1 3 Used different units (3 = Ib/hr) NSPTl Number of sourcespecies combinations with variable emissions scaling factors 

# - -

NPT2 Number of point sources with variable emission parameters provided in external file 

## - 

# -

MISC Other point source inputs include stack height, stack diameter, exit temperature, exit velocity, downwash flag and emissions by species 

## - 

# -

NARI Number of polygon area sources Varies by scenario 0 None modeled

IARU Units for area source emission rates are glm2/s 

### 1 1

NSARI Number of source 

## - - 

# • • 4-21 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • 

# • •

# •

• • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • •

• • • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • • • • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • CALPUFF Variable Description species combinations with variable emissions scaling factors NAR2 Number of buoyant polygon area sources with variable location and emission NLN2 Number of buoyant line sources with variable location and emission parameters NLINES Number of buoyant line sources ILNU Units for line source emission rates in gls NSLNl Number of sourcespecies combinations with variable emissions scaling factors MXNSEG Maximum number of segments used to model each line NLRlSE Number of distance at which transitional rise is computed XL Average line source length (m) HBL Average height of line source height (m) WBL Average building width (m) WML Average line source width (m) Value Included in CENRAP Protocol



## -



# -

-

-



# -

-

-



# -

-

-

- -

-

.



# -

-

-

.



# -

-

-

- Value Trinity Used Notes



### 4-22 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

# •

• • 

# • • 

# • • • • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • • • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol V Notes DXL Average separation between buildings (m) 

# · ·

FPRlMEL Average buoyancy er (m4/s3) 

### · · NYLl of volume 

### · 0 None modeled IVLU Units for volume source emission rates in grams/second 

### · 3 

# .

NSVLl Number of source· species combinations with variable emissions scaling factors 

# · ·

rGRDVL Gridded volume source data is not used 

# - -
VEFFHT Effective height of emissions (m) 

## - - VSIGYI Initial sigma-y value 

## - 

# - VSIGZI Initial signia-z value 

## - 

# - NREC



# • • 

# • • Number of nongridded receptors 5630 291 Receptor data provided in Appendix



# • • • 4-23 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants RefIned BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# •

## 5. CALPOST Trinity conducted a three-year CALPOST analysis to determine the change in light extinction caused by Lafarge's BART-eligible sources when compared to a natural background. The CALPOST model requires the input of concentration data output by CALPUFF. 

## 5.1 LIGHT EXTINCTION ALGORITHM Trinity utilized EPA's currently approved algorithm for reconstructing light extinction (as opposed to the new equation for reconstructing light extinction recommended by the IMPROVE Steering Committee). The light extinction equation is provided below.



### = 3*f(RH)*[(NH4)2S04] 

## + 3*f(RH)*[NH4N03] 

## + 4*[OC] 

## + l*[PM f ] 

### b ext 

## + 0.6 * [PM e ] 

## + 10*[EC] 

## + bRay 

### The algorithm was used to calculate the daily light extinction attributable to Lafarge's BART-eligible sources and light extinction attributable to a natural background. The change in deciviews based on the source and background light extinctions was evaluated using the equation below. 

### /). dv = 

### 10* 

### in b ext, background 

## + b ext, source 

# 1 [ b ext, background 

## 5.2 CALPOST PROCESSING METHOD Trinity used CALPOST Method 6, which calculates hourly light extinction impacts for the source and background using monthly average relative humidity adjustment factors. Trinity used monthly Class I area-specific relative humidity adjustment factors based on the centroid of the Class I area as included in Table A-3 of EPA's 

### Guidance/or Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Program. The factors for the relevant Class I areas in the analysis are provided in Table 5-1. TABLE 5-1. MONTHLY HUMIDITY FACTORS



### Class I Area Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 

### Dec 

### Caney Creek 

### 3.4 3.1 2.9 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.5 Hercules-Glades 

### 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.7 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.3

Upper Buffalo 

### 3.3 3.0 2.7 2.8 3.4 3.4 

### 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.3 3.2 3.3 Wichita Mountains 

### 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.4 3.0 2.7 2.3 2.5 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.8 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • • • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • 5-1 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 

### 06370l.0044 

# • •

# •



# •

5.3 NATURAL BACKGROUND 

# • • • • • 

# • For Caney Creek and the Wichita Mountains, Trinity used default west natural background values. Hercules-Glades and Upper Buffalo were processed using default east natural background values. 4 

# • 

# • The annual average concentrations are included in Table 2-1 of EPA's 

### Guidance/or Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Program and are provided in Table 5-2. TABLE 

### 5-2. DEFAULT AVERAGE ANNUAL NATURAL BACKGROUND LEVELS 

# • • • • • • • • 

# • 5.4 EvALUATING BART -EXEMPTION 

# • 

# • • • Trinity compared the high ofthe 2001 through 2003 daily**~dv** 

### values output by CALPOST to a contribution threshold of 0.5**~dv.** If the 98 th 

### percentile**~dv** values (the 7th 

### highest value, 22 nd 

### highest over three years) output by CALPOST is less 0.5**~dv,** 

### then the source is exempt from BART requirements. If the highest of the**~dv** 

### values output by CALPOST is greater than 0.5**~dv,** 

### then the source is considered subject to BART regulations and must start on a BART-determination process. 

## 5.5 SUMMARY OF CALPOST CONTROL PARAMETERS 

### Table 5-3 provides a listing of the CALPOST parameters that Trinity used in Lafarge's modeling analysis. In addition to the parameters used for Lafarge's modeling, the table also lists CENRAP's recommended parameters for comparison. In cases where a parameter to be used is different than what 

### CENRAP recommended, a short explanation as to the difference is provided. TABLE 

### 5-3. SUMMARY OF CALPOST INPUTS 

### Component Average Annual Natural Background West (j.lglm3) 0.12 

### Average Annual Natural Background East Olglm 3) 0.23 

### Ammonium Sulfate Ammonium Nitrate 0.10 0.10 

### Organic Carbon Mass 0.47 

### lAO



### Elemental Carbon 0.02 0.02 

### Soil 0.50 0.50 

### Coarse Mass 3.0 3.0



### CALPOST

Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes ISYR Starting year 2001 

### Appropriate met year Years 200 

### I, 2002, 2003 

### ISMO Starting month I I ISDY Starting day I 1 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • • • • • 4 Per comments received from EPA Region 7 to Trinity Consultants' Kansas City office, May 22, 2006. 

### 5-2 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • 

# • •

# •



# • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • 

# • CALPOST Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol
. Value Trinity Used Notes ISHR Starting hour 

### 0 1 All CALPUFF periods will be included NPER N umber of periods to process 

### 8760 8760 NREP Process every hour of data? 1 yes 1 1 ASPEC ILAYER Process species for visibility VISIB VlSIB Layer/deposition code; 1 for CALPUFF concentrations 1 1

A Scaling factor, slope 

### 0 0 B Scaling factor, intercept 

### 0 0 LBACK Add hourly background concentrations of fluxes? F F

LG Process gridded receptors? F F LD Process discrete receptors? Process complex terrain receptors? T T LCT F F LORING Report receptor ring results? F F NDRECP Select all discrete receptors -1 Varies As appropriate for Class I area being analyzed IBGRID mGRID X index ofLL comer of receptor grid -1 -1 Y index ofLL comer of receptor grid -1 -1 IEGRID X index of UR corner of receptor grid -1 -1 JEGRID Y index of UR corner of receptor grid -1 -1 NGONOFF Number of gridded receptor rows 

### 0 0 NGXRECP Exclude specific gridded receptors, Yes 

### =0 0 0 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • • 5-3 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 

### 063701.0044 

# • •

# •



# • • • • • 

# • • • • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • CALPOST Variable Description RHMAX Maximum RH% used in particle growth curve LVS04 Compute light extinction for sulfate? LVN03 Compute light extinction for nitrate? LVOC Compute light extinction for organic carbon? LVPMC Compute light extinction for coarse particles? LVPMF Compute light extinction for fme particles? LVEC Compute light extinction for elemental carbon? LVBK Include background in extinction calculation? SPECPMC Coarse particulate species SPECPMF Fine particulate species EEPMC Extinction efficiency for coarse particulates EEPMF Extinction efficiency for fine particles? EEPMCBCK Extinction efficiency for coarse part. Background EES04 Extinction efficiency for ammonium sulfate EEN03 Extinction efficiency for ammonium nitrate EEOC Extinction efficiency for organic carbon EESOIL Extinction efficiency for soil EEEC Extinction efficiency for elemental carbon Value Included in CENRAP Protocol 95

T T T

T

T

T

T PMC PMIO 0.6 1.0 0.6

3.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 10.0 Value Trinity Used 95

T T T

T

T

T

T PMC 

# lPMF

0.6 1.0 0.6

3.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 10.0 Notes

Notation difference



# • • • 

# • • • • 5-4 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • •

# •

• • • • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • 

# • • • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • CALPOST Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes MVISBK Method 6 for background 

### light extinction 6 6

BEXTBTBK Background extinction for MVISBK=1 12 Not Used Not necessary since MVISBK=6 RHFRAC % 

### of particles affected byRH 10 Not Used Not necessary since MVISBK=6 RHFAC Extinction coefficients for modeled and background hygroscopic species computed using EPA (2003) monthly RH adjustment factors Depends on Class I Area For Caney Creek: 

### 304,3.1,2.9,3.0, 3.6,3.6,304,304, 3.6, 3.5, 

### 304, 3.5 Hercules-Glades: 3.2,2.9,2.7,2.7, 3.3,3.3,3.3,3.3, 

### 304,3.1,3.1,3.3 Upper Buffalo: 3.3,3.0,2.7,2.8, 

### 304,304,3.4,304, 3.6, 3.3, 3.2, 3.3 Wichita Mountains: 

### 2.7,2.6,2.4,204, 3.0,2.7,2.3,2.5, 2.9,2.6,2.7,2.8 As appropriate for Class I area

BKS04 Background sulfate extinction coeff

- east 0.23 0.23 Used for HerculesGlades and Upper Buffalo BKN03 Background nitrate extinction coeff

- east 0.10 0.10 Used for HerculesG lades and Upper Buffalo BKPMC Background sulfate extinction coeff

- east 3.00 3.00 Used for HerculesGlades and Upper Buffalo BKSOC Background organic carbon extinction coeff- east lAO 

### lAO Used for HerculesGlades and Upper Buffalo BKSSOIL Background soil extinction coeff

- east 0.50 0.50 Used for HerculesGlades and Upper Buffalo BKSEC Background elemental carbon extinction coeff-east 0.02 0.02 Used for HerculesGlades and Upper Buffalo 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • • 5-5 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • •

# •

• • • • • • • 

# • • •



# • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • CALPOST Variable Description BKS04 Background sulfate extinction coeff

- west BKN03 Background nitrate extinction coeff

- west BKPMC Background sulfate extinction coeff

- west BKOC Background organic carbon extinction coeff-west BKSOIL Background soil extinction coeff

- west BKEC Background elemental carbon extinction coeff- west BEXTRAY Extinction due to Rayleigh scattering (IIMm) LDOC Print documentation image? IPRTU Print output units for concentrations and for deposition LlHR Report 1 hr averaging times L3HR Report 3 hr averaging times L24HR Report 24 hr averaging times LRUNL Report run-length averaging times LT50 Top 50 table LTOPN Top N table NTOP Number of Top-N values at each receptor ITOP Ranks of Top-N values at each receptor LEXCD Threshold exceedances counts Value Included in CENRAP Protocol 0.12

0.10

3.00

0.47

0.50

0.02

10.0

F 3

F F T F F F 4 1,2,3,4 F Value Trinity Used 0.12

0.10

3.00

0.47

0.50

0.02

10.0

F 1

F F T F F F 4 1,2,3,4 F Notes Used for Wichita Mountains and Caney Creek Used for Wichita Mountains and Caney Creek Used for Wichita Mountains and Caney Creek Used for Wichita Mountains and Caney Creek Used for Wichita Mountains and Caney Creek Used for Wichita Mountains and Caney Creek

Units preference



### 5-6 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 

### 063701.0044

# •

• • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • 

# • 

# • • • 

# •
• 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • CALPOST Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes THRESHl Averaging time threshold for 1 hr averages -1 -1

THRESH3 Averaging time threshold for 3 hr averages -1 -1

THRESH24 Averaging time threshold for 24 hr averages -1 -1

THRESHN Averaging time threshold for NAVOhr averages -1 -1

0 NDAY Accumulation period, days 0 NCOUNT Number of exceedances allowed 1 1 LECHO Echo option F F LTIME Time series option F F LPLT Plot file option F F LORD Use grid format instead ofDATA format F F

LDEBUO Output information for debugging? F F



# • • • • • • • • • • • 

# • • 5-7 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 

### 063701.0044



# -

# •



# • 

# • •



# • 

# • • 6. MODEL RESULTS

A summary ofthe top 25 visibility-impairing days at each ofthe relevant Class I areas over the 

# • • • • • • • • 

# • • • modeled 2001-03 period is summari zed in Table 6-1 to 6-4 below. Shaded values indicate visibility impacts that exceed the 0.5 Lldv threshold for contribution to visibility impairment. As seen in these tables, the 

### 98 th 

### percentile values indicate that the Tulsa Plant's contribution to visibility impairment is 

# • 

# • below the 0.5 dv threshold at each of the neighboring Class I areas. These results indicate that the Tulsa Plant therefore qualifies for exemption from BART. TABLE 6-1. VISIBLITY IMPACT MODEL RESULTS FROM CANEY CREEK 2001-03 

### Rank Modeled Background Extinction by Species (%) 

### Year Day Visibility



### ____________**~Im~p_a_ct_(~Ll_d_v~)1-~S~O~4L-** 

### __**~N~O~3** 

### __**~O~C~~E~C~~PM~C~~PMF** 

### "-peak 24-hr A**v~rage** 45.59
_**53.9_~,----=.:0.:::.:21** 0 2 

# • • 

# • 6.6_.5_8
__ ...**_.~3.25 O.O?~**  .. __..:..;.;:.

____.....;;. 68.81_--.:;.;=:::....
__ 4

8 

# • • 

# • • • 9 

## 1 0

.....

### _._-+--_..............."'..:...:::::.
.......--_..**---=~-** 

## ... - ....**".".,.~** 

## .............- ...".:
..'-'-
..... -- ....."
.. - ....__ .--'=-"_
..... .....::0.:.:..:.._+._
... ::".".:
...._._...... "..:::..,'
....... 1 11 

# • 

# • 12 

### o 0.04 0.14 L.
.......................**~.:** ... : : .... : .................. +_._36_.3_2**_...§~:~~_** ...**Q.,~?** 

### ...__.... . .........-- .. ....

## ­**~** ..**,,---.---~~-,** 1-

__..._......:;:.13:.....

__ . __ 1
...__:::.:...:..:....:......

__1...........:2=2:.:.:.2::::5_
......**2I:.~.~_ ~..**  0.04 0.11 1_
........___._....._....._: .. '-
.... __........

### _.+

__....................".:.:
..**:~.:..................** _1_.:::: :::.:.:... .._**44:~J2** ... _Q:g§__ 55 1

- ... 

### !L

__**~~.** 1

___.._ ......... ....:.::... ....................._ ..

## +··...···..··.. · ....**·"..:...:.,~·"····** 

## .... · .. · .. ···_·1_.:...73:::.:.2=--_
........-"'.,,.:."'--"
........._Q.:.!L_
...

### o

___ 0._05_
... 1------

___......:;:.::..

______

## + .._ ...__**.::.:..:.:~** 

## ___**.~1...........:2::.::9::.::.8:.:::9** ___ §9.4§..._._0_.2_9

___ 0_ 0.06 17 39.96 0.15 0.01 •••. "
.. _. __ ....**w_~_""'·~."""'_~,** 

# ° 18 

### 20 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 0.04 

### 98th Percentile 47.42 

### o 0.04 0.2

. .=2.::..3

____-I

__-------'0"-'".1.:.:;2:.....
__ .........:::66;::.:.::..54-'--._32_.7_4

__ 0_.3_3_
....... 

# ° 0.04 

### ..**..Q,,~L** 2003 110 

### r 

## ._11_._ 0.115 1--3=2:.:..1:..:1_
....**~~!.:<!.t..** _Q.._38_.
__ 

### !L
___ o

### .!..!_._ 0.35**2001_..~§_** 

# • 

# • 25 0.104 64.25 35.5 0.12 0.01 0.12 2001 89 

# ° 

# • 

# • 6-1 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • 

# •

# •

• • ••



# • 

# • • • • • • • •• 

# • • •

TABLE 6-2. VISIBLITY IMPACT MODEL RESULTS FROM HERCULES-GLADES 2001-03 

# • • • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • Rank Modeled Background Extinction by Species (%) 

### Year Day Visibility Impact (Adv) 50 4 

### N03 

## OC EC PMC PMF Peak 24·hr**Avera~I-** 

### __ 0:::..3;:c8:.-01_ 30.77 68.58 0.32 0 0.05 0.28 2001 362 2 30.45


## ....._--- ..__.._-_...... + .....-- ..--==:::=-...--+---=.::::...:..=-­ 69 0.26 0 0·
.. ___9·2f'L
. ...,_ 2003 351 

### -,
....

# __.....

### _._..**.-.~"""-~,--.~-.-.-** 

### 3 0.232 85.49 14.2 0.14 0 0.02 0.15 2003 256 0.191 32.92 2002 12 --""-'-' 39.7 60.01 0.16 0 0.01 0.13 2001 22

nn

___ """"

__ h**"-'~-' -.~.---.".--**  ....... 64.13**~~L** 

### __ O.13 0 0.03 0.15**?~_** 

### .. 

### ?L.

_ ...._.+.....:6:::.::6"-.1:..:::5

__..**_~~:!?1** 

### __.__QJ_L

____ O

___..**...Q,QL_QJ~..** 

### 2.9.92.
..._ .......___**~L** 44.92 1­

__. __ ,._._......_____ 

## +_.

___....**~..:..::....:** 

## ....__...._1__7:...:3"".2::..::6'-­
...

### ...?f3:1?..
.....

### _o'Jl
.._ .. 

### -.2_
...Q,.9
..L_
...

## _9.J.;L_
....2..oq?

___**.?~?_.** f

____ 7..,-'-"--:::._
......_+--=2:..:.7.:..:.0c::3_
.......**1?:3~** ......_O'.27 ._. __ 0 _
.. O.O§._
...

### JL?L._......fQ9.L_
..**_~_** 

### .. 0.128 27.6 71.62 0.38 0 0.05 0.35 2002 47

- .. ... .-..**----~"--** 1-
.....................___ ..... :.............__...___ 

### +................... c.:. .. :...... :: .. _................... f
.... _ ...**~Q:.!5.9.._.........** 48. 86
......_ ....**.9..:.?.~._** ......_ ..._Q.......
. ...Q,g.f3..._.9...27
...._... _ 2003
............... 

### !l.?
....._ l3 14 16 17 18 19 1--_---=2::..::0
.. ___ 21 98th 

### Percentile 

### 23 24 25 41.77 57.85 61.73 37.32

." ..**~~** ......**-~** 54.45 45.18 41.95 57.61 52.86 46.71

- ..**,,~,~,,-** .. ---. 38.76

52.28 :.:=-:_-----'3::..::9.94 5.27 0.16 0 0.02 0.54 0 0.06

....

# __....

# _-_.•.

# _",_

. 0.2 0 0.01
'''''-­ 0.21 0 0.02
0.15 0 0.03 0

0.22 

### o 0.13 

### o 0.46 

## o 0.23 

### o 0.08 0.26



### 6-2 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044

# • 

# • • • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • •

• • 

# • • • • 

# • • • TABLE 

### 6-3. VISIBLITY IMPACT MODEL RESULTS FROM UPPER BUFFALO 

### 20Ot-03 

### Rank Modeled Background Extinction by Species (%) 

### Year Day 

# • • • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# •


# • • 98th Percentile 0.114 40.74 58.94 0.16 0 0.01 0.14 

### 24 0.113 58.63 40.9 0.21 0 0.02 0.24 2001

.............. 

### 25 0.113 73.93 

# • • • • • •

6-3 Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044 

# • •

# •• 

# ••



# • • • 

# • • • • TABLE 6-4. VISIBLITY IM:PACT MODEL RESULTS FROM WICHITA MOUNTAINS 2001-03 

### Background Extinction by 

### Species (%) 

### Year Day Visibility Impact 1----------------------------1 (L\dv) 

### Rank Modeled 50 4 

### N0 3 

### OC EC PMC PMF 28.14 0.15 0 0.03 0.15 

# • • 

# • • • 19 0.34 0 0.1 0.34 66.34 0.27 0 0.07 0.26 2002 306**-,.~~-** .. ,42.27 57.04 0.31 0 (l.07 2003 43 

### 5 0.24 78.29

.. 21.38**.~_.** 0 0.04 2003 

### ...J§L m""
..... ""_••**~.,.,"** .. _''',',' 

### r-

_____**6~** 

### .. _ ............_ ......**_.~0.2=:2=8_** .. __ ....**+-~~~.~3~1** ___**4~5~.5~5** __**~0~.0~7** ___**~0~** __**~0.~0~1** 0.07 2003 59**M_·'W~** .. ___ .,.. 1--
..__ ...7.:.

__ .. __ ..._.1
.................... 0:"

.. =2:""'26-:..
........_ .....--l
...**~0=.0:.::2'--_4.:..:9:.:::.5:..:..7_-=0.=.2.3_.()._-.!l:OL_0J..i.** ..... _.2001
..**~308** .... . 1-

___... _.8.:::.

_____

## + .._ ....._....:::.:0
..:::2.:17.:._
..__+......:-:3:-::::8.29"----"6:..:.1:.::..2:::..9_...:0:.:.:.1:.::9.

__.::0
.. __**.J1.:.0~.** 0.18**~.** __**.~_** .. 

### 9 0.213 52.47 47.07 0.23 0 0.05 0.19 2003 145 

# • • • • • 

# •

__....c1;..;.4 

### QJ 38.
....._ ...:..;17_:--=-=_ 1--

__----i

___ ... __ .._ ..... 1_9;:..;1:..:,:.7..:..1_--'-7.:.::.94-'.- --=0.:..;..1..:..4_--=0

__.....:0:.:.;.0:....:.4.

__.....::.:0 2002 149 1--

__ ... ..::. ..._.__ :.1..:.;12=6
...._. __ .. t_._6_1"Q4
..:.:15'---.-._



### __ 0,QIL_..;;.;0.:.:.;15,,-­ 1-=---.5_._-'._
..._ 0-::..
.. ___..::3c:::8.c:::.,61'--_-=0
....

### Q 16 0.126 85.29 14.22 0.21 0 0.06 0.22 

### 17 0.12 4§l.:.t?
....... __**~.9_.B_5_0_.2§_** 0 0.06 0.24

..............**--,.,-.'''~~'''''** ..**~".** 

### 18 0.12 BO.19 19.39 0.19 0 0.04 0.21

...... ­**I----~--·--I······················** ..**··:.,··~=·-·-··-·i--·~~-~~** 19 0.119 42.63 56.9 0.22 0 0.02 0.22 20 0.11 2.B2 0.34 0.07 0.37 ._-'-,,--" 

# ° 21 0.102 95.05 4.09 0.38 0 0.08 0.4 

### 98th Percentile 0.102 50.45 49.12 0.2 0 0.02 0.21 

### 23 0.102 26.84 73.06 0.05 0 0.Q1 0.04



## __._...**_~4,_""""_"_,** 

## ___""",,,,,,_, 37.24 0.24 

### 25 59.38 0.45 

### o 0.19 0.44 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • •

,

# .• • • • 

# • 6-4 Lafarge Building Materials 

# • 2002 156 2003 279 2002 357 2003 278**N_~D** __ 2001 16 2003 223 2001 223 ,"-­ 2001 78 2002 123**'~_** •• M •• •• _ ••• _. 2001 268



# • • Trinity, Consultants Refined BART Modeling Report 063701.0044


# - •

# •• ApPENDIX A - EMISSION DATA



# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • • • • • 

# • • • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • • • • 

# • • • • Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Protocol 063701.0044 

# • • • 

# -

# •

# ••• ••••, ••:1**..~** 

# lit•••••••••· ••••

" .\ Printed 1013012006



### Year Installed

1964 1964 1964 1964 1964 1964 1964 1964 1964/1997

1974 1974 1974 

### Was this Unit in Existence on August 7, 1977? (Y or N)
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 

### Was this Unit in I Potential to Emit (tons/year) Operation after August 7, 1962? (Y or N) I PM IO 

### I NO. I SOl I VOC I NH)

Y 28.90 

## I 2.70 

### I 0.02 

### I 0.20 

# I I I Y 3.20 Y Y 4.20 Y 128.4011261.0012102.001 5.90 

# I I 25.50 

# I Y Y 3.20 Y 3.20 

### I I I I I 

# I I I I 34.50 

# I Y Y 

# I 7.00 Y 2.40 Y 240.50 [1263.7012102.021 6.10 

# I 0 

### Emission P . t 

# L I P' OlD



### EUG Oint ID I(UnitID)

## ~ 2A I I I

11 

# I I 7 Coallcoak unloading 

### Unit Description (Include MMBtulhr if applicable) Which of the 26 Categories does this Unit

fall into?A

I 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EP28 Coallcoak drag cOlweyor, bucket elevators 3 EP28 C oallcoak crusher 3 Total 

## 1 1 A. See attachc<nist of categories

Lafarge Building Materials Using Title V Trinity Consultants BART Modeling A-1 063701.0044

,'•.• I.;<i

# ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Printed 1013012006

Source Emissions Location Point III Unit Description
, Constr.Datel Heat Duty (MMBtulhr) Process Rate TPH Hours of Operation (hrs/day) Emission Factors PM 10 (Ilr/ad) Tulsa EP05 Raw millpump hopper 1964
-­ 100 24 0.025 Tulsa EPI3 Kiln #2feed .Iystem 1964 

## -­ 120 24 0.025 Tulsa EP24 #2 bucket elevator and separator 1964 

## -­ 39 24 0.025 Tulsa EP26 Finish mill #2 1964 

## -­ 39 24 0.025 Tulsa EP25 Finish mill #2feed bell 1964 

## -­ 39 24 0.025 Tulsa EPI7 Clinker cooler #2 1964/1997
-­ 96 24 0.025 Tulsa EP27 Coal kook unloading 1974
-­ ISO 24 0.025 Tulsa EP28 Coal kook drag conveyor, bucket elevators, crusher 1974 

## -­ ISO 24 0.025 Construction datcs and sourcc parameters as listed in Permit 98-174-TV. Construction of EP14 (odlcr kiln) commcnced on 1961 which is outsidc the 7-Aug-62 to 7-Aug-77 BART eligibility window. Source Emissions Location Point III Tulsa EPOS Unit Description Raw millpump hopper N02 Ibs/hr



# -­ PM 10 Ibslbr 0.429 Emission Data Input PM (coarse)2 PM (fine)l Ibslhr Ibslbr 0.300 0.129 S02 Ibs/hr



## -­ Tulsa EPI3 Kiln #2feed system 0.557 0.390 0.167 

## -­ Tulsa EP24 #2 bucket elevator and separator 3.402 2.381 1.021 Tulsa EP26 Finish mill #2 0.429 0.300 0.129 

## -­ Tulsa EP2S Finish mill #2feed belt 0.429 0.300 0.129 

## -­ Tulsa EPI7 Clinker cooler #2 

## -­ 4.607 3.225 1.382 

## -­ Tulsa EP27 Coo/kook unloading 

## -­ 0.375 0.263 0.113

-­ Tulsa EP28 Coo/kook drag conveyor, bucket elevators, crusher 

## -­ 0.321 0.225 0.096
-­ 2 PM Speciation based on AP 42 Table 8.2-2 category 4 (Dryers, grinders, etc.), PM2.5.is 30% ofTSP PM IO - Z .5 (filterable) 70% PM (coarse) PM z . 5 (condensible) 30% PM (fine)

Lafarge Building Materials Fabric Filters Trinity Consultants BART MorlAlino A-2 063701.0044

# ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Printed /013012006

Source Emissions Location Point ID Unit Description Tulsa EP 15 I Kiln, screw conveyors, & bucket elevator 1964

Emission Factors for NOx & S02 based on AP-42 (1/95) Table 11.6-8, PM 10 based on baghouse manufacturer exhaust loading rate. 2 Construction dates and source parameters as listed in Permit 98-1 74-TV. Unit EPI4 constructed outside of the 7-Aug-62 to 7-Aug-77 BART eligibility window 3 Where necessary, Ib/MMSCF were converted to IblMMBtu using a natural gas heating value 0: 1020 BTUlSCF Source Emissions Location Point ID Unit Description SOl SO. 

## NG. Emissions· PM IO (lb/hr) PM (coarse)4 PM (fine)· EC SOA Tulsa EPI5 Kiln, screw conveyors, & bucket elevator 960.00 12.91 576.00 17.143 1.149 1.320 0.000 1.766
4 Condensible/filterable PM speciation were based on the following proflles: National Park Service guidance for PC Dry Bollom FF. http://www2.naturc.nps.gov/air/Pcrmits/cct/cctCcmcntKiln.cfm Coarse 6.70% Fine Soil 7.70% Fine soil included in model as PM (finc) FineEC 0.00% CPMlOR 75.30% Inorganic condensible PM considered sulfates per NPS guidance CPMOR 10.30% Organic condensible PM considered secondary organic aerosols per NPS

Lafarge Building Materials Kiln Trinity Consultants BART Modeling A-3 063701.0044

# • •••**"~** 

## - ....... '. ,"

# '''~,

# •.•

'

# ••••• '.

Printed 1013012006

Source Emissions Emission Factors :,L Location Point III Unit Description Constr. Date Heat Duty Exhaust FI,owrate Hours of Operation NOx PM IO SOl i(MMBtu/hr (aefm) (hrs/day) i(lh/MMBtu) i (et/acC) (Ib/MMBtul

----------------­ Tulsa EP04 #2 discharge chute, separator, bucket elev. 1964 1.2 ' 36,000 24 0,075 0.025 0.001
I NO. & SDz emission factors based on AP-42 (7198) Table 1.4-1 and 1.4-2,PMIO based on baghouse manufacturer exhaust loading rate. 2 Ib/MMSCF eonvll1ed to Ib/MMBtu using a natural gas heating value of 1020 BtulSCF
Source Emissions , Emission Data Inpue Location Point ID Unit Description SOl S04 NO. PM IO PM
... , .. PM n.. EC SOA (Ib/hrl Tulsa EP04 #2 discharge chide. separator, bucket elev. 0.001 

### .­ 0.089 3.857 0.964 2.893 _. 3 Condensible/filterable PM speciation were based on the following profiles: For Natural Gas, National Park Service guidance for NG·fired combustion turbines. http://www2.nature.nps.gov/air/Pennits/cct/cctGasFiredCT.c!in PM IO•2 .5 (filtcrablc) 25% PM (coarse) PM 2,5 (condensible) 75% PM (fine)

Lafarge Building Materials Combustion Sources Trinity Consultants BART Modeling A-4 063701.0044 

# j

# It•••':.•;.· •••'•••• ;.**~,r:** . 

# ':,: ••·.,·.,1

Printed 1013012006

Stack parameters (Eng/ish) 1 Location Point ID Stack Flow Tulsa EP04 36,000 Tulsa EP05 4,000 Tulsa EPI3 5,200 Tulsa EPI5 160,000 Tulsa EP24 31,750 Tulsa EP26 4,000 Tulsa EP25 4,000 Tulsa EPI7 43,000 Tulsa EP27 3,500 Tulsa EP28 3,000 Stackparameters (Metric) Location PointID Tulsa EP04 Tulsa EP05 Tulsa EPI3 Tulsa EPI5 Tulsa EP24 Tulsa EP26 Tulsa EP25 Tulsa EPI7 Tulsa EP27 Tulsa EP28 Exit Velocity ft/sec 11.94 8.29 9.55 17.83 10.53 33.16 33.16 3.56 4.64 4.91 Exit Velocity (m/s) 3.64 2.53 2.91 5.44 3.21 10.11 10.11 1.09 1.42 1.50 Stack Height feet 100 55 97 60 100 64 55 53 7 135 Stack Height (m) 30.49 16.77 29.57 18.29 30.49 19.51 16.77 16.16 2.13 41.16 Stack Dia. feet 4 1.6 1.7 6.9 4 0.8 0.8 8.0 2.0 1.8 Stack Dia. (m) 1.22 0.49 0.52 2.10 1.22 0.24 0.24 2.44 0.61 0.55 Stack Temp. Fahrenheit 180 70 200 500 200 70 200 200 70 70 Stack Temp

Kelvin

355 294 366 533 366 294 366 366 294 294 Base Elev. 2 (feet) 875 820 851 768 890 854 845 788 754 8j}5 Base Ek-v. (meters)

267 250 259 234 271 260 258 240 230 245
I Source parameters obtained from Permit 98-1 74-TV 2 Base elevations obtained from visual inspection of USGS topographic map!

Lafarge Building Materials Stack Parameters Trinity Consultants BART Modeling A-5 063701.0044

# •



# • • • 

# • • • APPENDIX 

## B - DATA FILE LIST 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • _.



# • •• 

# •• 

# • • • •• 

# • 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • • Station ID LIST OF SURFACE STATIONS

Location Winfield/Ark. Ci""tv'-'..**~KS",,-** _______ Station No. (official ID Latitude (d .)

7..7.4502 .___ .._.Jll(i§._ Longitude
-97.033**Bartlesvill""e.-"O~K-,--** __________**-,-7~23"-,5",6,,,-5** __......_ ...3.!iL(i7..
.._ .... _._ .. _:2!i'Q.l1
.... _. Childress. TX 723604 ._....__.._ ..**3.~Hn** .._ •._... -100.283 CoffeYVille MunicioaL KS 724519.17JQQ
....._.__**.2~**

.**ChanutelM~n** John. KS 13986.n,§§1.
.. _.._ .... . .::2?,4.8.J
...._..

.... Clil).ton-SherIlllll!,_OK

_____ . 723526.3.5..Jn._._
... __**.:22,~00**

..... _DentO!LTX
_______ 722589


### ...........**:27.J.~.3...._**

El Dorado/Goodwin_ AR.-'--

_______---"9""3"'99"-=2'--_ 

### 11l.!L
... _ ........ ----=2.b..817

...................... .Yanfll AF!JlEnid. OK 723535
__ ......•. 

### }!i13.3._
....... _._ -97.91_7_

........... She!:!!]lllllI?.ennison. TX

_____ . ___---'-7-=22""6"-'7-"'3

__ ........ 

### _.}11J7._._
......**_.~2§J:i§7._**

......_..**Fred~Jick._~** _____ .___ . 22222
... 

### _3.413.3.
__ .... __**~2~,2~L** Fliooin. AR 55555
.. 

### .3.!iJQQ
... ___... -92.467

......**Fort~mith·_M !3964}_~13.3..**  -94.367**.FavettevilleLPrak~** AR

__ .__ .. 93993
.. 

### }_!i99Q.
. .....

### :24J!i?
......._

.. . Gae:e. OK 13975
.. _ .. 3.!iJQQ
... _ ...___ :22]§.Z
..._ Hobart OK 93986.

__... 

### 3.2,.9.QQ
..... _. ___..:-2.2,.9..29.
__

. ...,H"'o-"t S",o,..nn",,· ",e:s",­

. ...,AR=--

__________ 7'-'2"'3"'41'-=5'___
.....___**.?_4,4§7.._._._~·9'_=3"'.0'"8",-3** _ _1**...,Harri=-,-·",·so",nIB~o",o",n",-e-",C",-o.,,-.** AR'-='--

_______--"13"'9'-'7.!.1

__ ..___..3.§.,ln

___ ...__**-~93"'._"11.'_'7**_ _I McConnell AFB. KS 3923
. ___

### .3.7.61L

__... __**~2n§L** 

### .. Wichita KS""'--___________**39~8** __._._._Jl&?Q.

__...__ ..**~2H?3** ..._.l::!
........_........_}oolin Rel!ionaL MO
. _______**--'7-=2~34"'9"'5** ___.._._._..3.7-15Q
.._ ..__. __**~94** ..299
.._ .._ Lawto"'n.-"O"-'K"'-

__________**~99"'9"'99~** __ .....__._... }4,.2!i7..
..___**._._~-9'-'8"-.4'-'-1_'_7** __ 1 Liberal. KS 11111
...... _._ ..**3.l,m~** ......_._.... _ -100.950 Little Rock/Adams. AR

________**--'1-"'39~6""3'___** ......__..**}4.21~** 

### ......__.... _ ...... :27,7..3.?
.._. Little Rock AFB. AR 723405
...._ .. .3.4.JE
..._._..... _-=27.J19
..._ ..

... _._Q
.. __ ....**Mu~koe:ee/Q!lvis** Field. OK 11112.
__**.3.~§..?Q.** __._... ____

### :2.2d§7

___ McAlester Ree:ionaL OK"-

______----"9-=-39"-'5"'0'___

_ ..**_.~4.JQQ** .. __ ...**_~-9'_=5"--'.7'_"8"'_3** _ _I Mena International Mun
.. AR 723435
........._ .._J!JJ.Q
.._ .........._--'-'-9"'4"'.2C'-17'--.



### ....... 'OklaJ:\.oma City. OK

____-"'13<-"9"'6.!...7

__.........._ ..**~5..~4QQ.** __....._..**_.~2I§QQ.** . _J-l·orman-vtesthe!m!l!:.**O~** __ . ___ 7'-'2"'3"'57'_"0'--

__..... _._ ..**3..5...7.1~** .. _ ................._.:2H?Q
.... .. Medicine Lode:e. K""S____

___--'7""2""45""2"'0'--_
.... _._ .... E.7.J!3.
..._ ............._---'-9-=8=.5",50,,--_**.Poll~.£)tv·_91L.** __ ._._.. __ .... ___-'1-=-39"-'6""9
__**'par~on~ri** <;:itv.JS.L_ 745431
..**J7}~?**

........ ParislCo?'**Fi~ld.** 

### IX

__________-=3"'33"'3""3'___
......_ ........It§3.3.
..

....**Ro~ers.** AR _. 66666'
......._ ......J!iJ.Q!..

_.Sori!Jgfielq. MO
_____ 13995
.........**_.JV~.3.** ....__ ...... . ...........**~95.517**

... .......**~95.450**



### _:24J99
..._

-93.383 

### Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants

. Refined BART Modeling Protocol 063701.0044.... Siloam SoriJ:!l!.**~'--** ___ ___..!...77"-,7,-,-7..!...7

__.......__._ ...l(Lm
..._.___ ...**_._:2~A~J.** __.... Wichita Falls
.. TX

________--'1"""3"'966""'-

__ ....__....**IL9~~** 

### ..._._......__ -_"_9"'8.=_51"_'7'___I Stillwater. O""K"'-

___ _____**~1l~1~13'---** __......**_~§..J..?:Q** .._ .._ .._-97.083

.....__ .Fort Leonl!!d**Wood~** .. ___**---'-'72"'44~57'--_** ...... _ ...**_._J?7~Q_** ......___**~~!?L**

........ 3ink!!r AFB".....-"'O"'K'--
________ ._ ..**72~?~0** ...__ ..... _J..?41L_
......._ ....... _

....**_~.97.cJ.~L** .. .

____ . _____-'7-=2=.o25'-'4
..... 1

___..... _._ ... 

### J?cHJ_.
__ .... _ ...__**~9§..583** Tulsa lnt. Airnort. OK 13968
...... _._._..J§,;WO
...___....**_~-9'-=5"'.8""8"'-3** _ _I Texarkana ReeiolJll"'I.""TX'-'-"-

_______..... 1"""3""97""7

__.......__._.....lH..?JL
...._ ....**_~-9'-'4"-'.0'_"0"'_0** _ _I Bentonville. AR**_~_.....;8"-'8"'8"'-88"__** __ ......_ ......J§,}..?...Q
...._ ..__. ___ ....**-94.~E** __ M Ardmore Municioal. OK 723555 34.300 -97.017

LIST OF PRECIPITATION STATIONS Cooperative station ID Location/name State Latitude (deg.) Longitude (deg.) 30130 ALUM FORK AR 34.480 -92.510**~O 17~**  __ .. _ .._... ANTOINE
. _____ . ___.._...;..A.c:..R'--

__**.}±.2.~0_** ..__ -_9_3._25_0_
..._ 30220 ARKADELPHIA 2 N AR 34.090 -93.030 30458 BATESVILLE LIVESTOCK AR 35.500 -91.460 30530 BEEBE

_______........:..AR=-=-_
...... .J...s...:Q:I.<L
.._____...**~2!_.5_40** __.._**~.Q.~.~** ....__._. ____**..!'!~~YVI:....:..:=LL""E=..::.5** . .:..:NW:..:..:...
.._ ... __ .__.. __..:..:A:.::R'-­
...**_~~.,~Q** ...._ ......**_.:~3.3:?()_._** 3.Q_764_
.._._..._,B=.:L=.:Ac.::K:.:;::EL=.Y:.....:.:M.:..:O:..:UN::.:..:.T.:..:Ac.:::I:.:..N:...:D::.:Ac..:.M:.:..:..-

___ ._:...:A::.:R=--_.....;3=...4;.:,:.3:..:4c::O

____ -9_3._12_0_**~Q79~_** .._____ B=-L=.UE=_"M.:..:O:..:UN::.:..:.T.:..:A...::IN:.:..:...:D::.:Ac.::M=-

_____---=-A.::.:Rc:.......
_ _=3.::..5.:.:.0.:..;70'---

__ -...;..9::.:3
. .::..39:...:0:........._1**~.083?._._** .. 30842**..._._B_O_O~_EV_I_L_L~_3_S_SE** __ . ______**._A~R** ___**}2:.Q~.Q...._** ...._ ..._ ...**~~:.s2Q_** ... _ BOTKINBURG 3 NE AR 35.430 -92.280

............................................_-_ .._---­ ................................................

## _ ...... . 30900 BRIGGSVILLE AR 34.560 -93.300

..... _----_ ....

# _ ..

### _

.....

# _ ..........

# _ ....... - .......... ­ ......... ­ 31020 BULL**SHOA."'L:..;S....;;D,~A...;..M** _______---'A"'R:..:....._ ...:3....:c6':"c2:,;;;2,;:...0

___ -9-=.2.;.c.3...;..40"----I**~3-ll-4-0-_.--~C..:..:A~L.:..:10::.:N~L~&:..:D~--------:...:A~R~--=33::.:** .**.:..:18~0~_~-9~2~.2~90~_1 3JJ.~**  ....._ .. ___ . __**CI\MD§~_** ..__.. __ . _____ . __........:...:A=-=R_
...**_2l.}~Q_** ...___**._~f.,:I.?Q_** 31457 CLARKSVILLE 6 NE AR 35.320 -93.240
..........._._......_ ... -_....__........_ ...__._.__........._-_.

__...._._.._._._._:..=.:_.....__.... - .........._._......_ ....__......_ .......**~!582** COMPTON AR 36.050 -93.180**~!952..** ___.....__..__p=..:E::...::sQ.::U=E=EN:..:...::D.:..:A:.:cM-"-

_______--=..:A::.:R'--_....:3:..:4-'.:.0.:::,6°"--

__ -::..94-".2:::2:.::0
__ 32020 DIERKS DAM AR 34.0?Q....

___ ._ -94.95o

__.._**~.?~.~** 

### ..__**I?Y._~~** 

### .........__.___________ .....**.A~** 

### ....__ ._..... 33**.530=~:f~<L** .... .**~230Q_** .. __......_ ..E_L_D_O_RA

__

D_OgOo.'2..."Y..IN_FD

___ P2356 32444 EUREKA SPRINGS 3 WNW FA YETTEVILLE EXP STN AR
...**~J~g** 

### __ . __ ..**-92.:I.~** __ AR 36.250 -93.470 AR 36.060 -94.100**~j.~_.** ___._cF:...:E:.:RN.=..::D=.:A...::L=E=...6=-=E

________....:AR-=.:..._
...**_.~_::I.~Q** _____._:?_2.:_27_0
__**~.s._"±...._** 

### .... __ ._ FOREl'1AN

__________...__---=-A.::R-=--
_ _**~:~Q** .._._.........::?4_.2_3Q......._ FORT SMITH MU, OKc:.....

_____..__.:..:A=R'---_
.._35.:?QQ.._
...**.........::?~:229.........._.** 1



### Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Protocol 063701.0044

# •

• 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • •


# • 

# • •• 

# • •• 

# • • 

# • •



# • 

# • 

# • • • •



# • • • 

# • • • 

# •

• 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • •**~~.22i** 

### .. __ .__-,G::.::I=LB::.:E=Rc:.:T,---

____ . _____---,-A""R_,__

___ 3_5._59_0
_ ___ -92_A_3_°_**3~81** O
... _____**~G",I:::::L::::LHA:o:.:~M'--___** . _____ .__**.:.:A::.:R'--_..:3:c.:4~.1=20=--** ____ -..::.9.-"4
. .:;.:15:.;0'-­ 32978

..._ .._g_RE_ERS**.~E~Y I?~_M**  __ . __..____-,-,A::.:R,--
_ _**~}l.L_.** 

### ____**::2~-,QQQ_** ...**~}1}~.** HARDY AR 36.170 -91.280

••••••••••• _ •••• H •••••••• _ •••••••••••••••••••• _ •••••••• _ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• _ •••••• 33165 HARRISON FAA AP**~¥** 

### __...___.._.::.:HUN:.::.:..:..::T=-SVI-'-=L:.::L:::E--"I...::.Sc::S-'-W'--_.

_____-'A-=R"--

__ }_6_.0_4_0

___• -93A50 34185 LEWISVILLE AR 33.220 -93.340 34248 NORTH LITTLE ROCKfMUNICIPAL AR 34.500 -92.160**~.~?56.** __ ..._....... 

### _.MENA._._
..._ ...___..__._._.. _ _ ....**_._A:...:R~_** ...**_~~:~Q** ... _ .... __..**:.~±l~.9.._** 

### ......**3~839** __ .__**._._:.:.. M:.::IL=L~..:Wc.:..O::::.O:;;;.::::.D...::D:.:.AM** **:::.:..** _______**___=_A.::.:R~** _ __:::.:33::.:.A'_'I..:::.0

___**----'-~_3._59_0_ 3~988._._._"'M:-=-O::::.UN.::.:..:.T.:....:.:ID::.:A..:..::..3..:::S::::E**  _______ ._:..:A.:.:R'___
_ _=3:..:.4:.=..3=2.0:=--

__ -9::..:3:.:.;.3:.:5..:::.0_ 35110

..._ ...**_N_A_~_OW_S_D_A_M** __....___._.._._.:..A:.::R=---
__**.}..±:Q~Q..** ..**_._::2}~30** .. _ 35112 NASHVILLE AR 33560 -93510

......._-_._---_......... -.. . 35200

_... .N_I_MROp.**D~~** ___ . ____ .. ___ AR.}..±??Q..
..**:.~~JQ9_.** __ 35228 NORFORK DAM AR 36.150 -92.150**~2_0_** .._. ___.::..N:.::O:.::..R:.::T=..:H:..::L:;:.ITT.:...:.;:L::.::E:...;R;..:.O::...C;;;.:KfMUNI=:.;;;;.::..;.:.C.;;;.;I:.:.P:...;A:::L._....:A..::R:..:.-_--"--34.cc.:...;50;..;;0

__---'--9..;;;2.;..;;.1.::..60'----I 35602 PARTHENON AR 35570 -93.150**~??~'!** .......__...._ .....__

### Xr..NE**.! 3.!::.IB** **:.~** 

### ___....._ ....__...___._..::.A""R_'___
....**...l.~!..±9.** 

### ....__ ... __**:.?~1** 

### . .9_
.._. 3?2.Q§.
...____._cP:...;RE..;;;::.::S-"C-"O..::.T..::.T

__________---'-A:.:;R=---_....:3::.::3c:..A"'8::::.0

___ -..::.93::.:."'23::.::0'-----1 3?393 ....•_. __.._.:S_T-"P.c..A-"UL-"-'..

___________ A'-'R'-'--

__**3~5_._49_0** ____**-~346.9._** 36920 STUTTGART 9 ESE AR 34.280 -91.250

...

# __.....

# _ ....

# __.....

# __._.. ...

### _._....

# __.... _--'----_ ......

### _._..........

# _ .._ ......

# __....

# _ .........

# _ ......

# _­ 37488 WALDRON AR 34.540 -94.060

.......................... _ ..... . 141427
........_ ...... _.C_HA_.**Nl[T_E_l'v!:!Q.Jil'I~QN ~.!'_**  

### ...._ ... _..:.K:.::S'--_
......**}2:~.9..L** ..._ ......**::2.?.~2.9.** ___ ._14_16_99

__..._. __. ...:C:..:O:.:::;L=B..:;.Y....:1...:S:...;W-'--

________---CK:::S=--_......;;:..39:...;.::..24.:..;:0

___ -..::.1.::..01;::..0:..;4:..:;.0_-1**~.~4----._-=D~O-=D...:G:.::::E....:C:::IT.::..Y.::...::..MU~,.:.:K=S--------'K:.::::S=---~37:..:.A~6:.::..0** __**~-9.::..9:.=.5.::..80~_** 142432
......_.. __ ... EL_KHA_.RT

__ .______ _",",K=.S_
.... 

### _}?:.929.._.:.!9.1.:.?}.9.._ 142980
.. __ 

### QARJ?JO:1i
.. 

### £!.E EXR STI.'I

___ ._. __.......;:;K=S_
....**_~.?QQ9..._** .....**_~}9..9..:.~~L** 1**~}95~__** __..._cIND,"-'-":.=E"-P::::ENDo..:.o::EN"'-'-C=E"-

_______**---"K"'S'---_..:3:.:.7.:.:.1:..:. 40~**  ___ -:.;95:::.A=20, 143984 lOLA 1 W KS 37.550 -95.260 r- ...._ .... -- ... - ..._­ 145175_MEDICINE LODGE

________K..-S"___.}?:!.?L
.. _.:2.?}30_ 147922 SUBLETTE KS 37.290 -100.500 148830 WICHITA KS. KS 37.390 -97.260

.. - ...

### _ ..

### _

......

# _ ...

# _ ....

# _._..._ ..

## __.....

# __ ._....

# _ ...• ----'--_ ..•.....

# _ .........

# _ .•.... -- .....•. - .......... - ......•-­**~_:3_078_9_** .._____"'B::..:O::.=L::.:I..:..VA:...:.:.:R

__________....:M=O

__...::3.:..7::::.3
. .:.:70:....

___....:-9...::3...::.2::.;30'-_--1**~32302** DORA MO 36A70 -92.140**~~315._____.** ___ JOPLll-!
..**ICIPAL..Af ....**  ___ . MO 37.090 -94.300**@}~~~.~** 

### .. _ ...._ ..**_.!!RK.~Yl~!-E** 

### __..._ ..._ ... ___ .._._. MO 40.120 -92.340**~.~~~___.** __ L:::E:::B.:.:A::..:Nc:::O.:..N:...:2=-W'-'-

________....:M:.::.O::::....._ 37.410 •.

__**:?24~~ ~~191 ~**  __ .._._.. LICKING 4 N MO 37.330 -91.530**@350~2......_..!::OCKWQOD** _. ______ . MO}7.23.L._._.:2},5l9...
__**@~?}9.?.** MARSHFIELD MO 37.200 -92.550

### @}??~'!... 

# _ ......

### _-_....

# __ ..

# __...

# _ ..._

...

### _._.

# __._...

# _ .......- ...... _.:.:..:..::'--_ .......

# __...

# _ ......

# _ .........

# _ ..

### _

...•.

# _ ....... . MILLER 1 E MO 37.130 -93.500**~36460** OZARK BEACH MO 36AOO -93.080 

### Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Protocol 063701.0044

# •

• • • 

# • • • 

# •

.._--.

# __ .. --.-­ ..............**-~** SPRINGFlELDIMUN. MO. MO 37.140 .93.230

..**-.~--** ...

### ­ STOCKTON DAM MO 37.420 -93.460 TABLE ROCK DAM MO 36.360 -93.180 MO 36.450

OK 36.450 -96.000**-~--.** BENGAL

...**~-** ......

## ­ ..**--~----------~-** ..... --. _c::0.:.::K

____..._34_5!_o
___ -95.050 .102.290
ClllCKASHA EXP STN OK 35.030 -97.550 DUNCAN AIRPORT OK 34.290 -97.580 -'---

__________ O:::;K"'-_ 35.230

OK 36.450 -98.080

OK 36.090 -97.370 OK 34.530 -95.470 OK 35.460 -95.200 NOWATA OK 36.420 -95.380

, ..... _ •••• _ ••• m .. _._ ••••

_____ •

___ ••**_~~** __**""~** __ .. __ ._. -"'O:::IL:o.;T:.oO;:.:N.:c2=.S""E:::.......

________---'O::.:K-'---_ 36040 -96.340 OKEMAH OK 35.260 -96.180 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK OK 35.230 -97.360

______.!'_A_WNE_._E_5_N
____ ....______

### 9JS.._
...**_---.?.~~40** ...............**~?~~?(L** 

### .. '--

___---':.==:...=.::.:..:...::.:..o::.:..:.:..:..:.:'----

_____**...::::O.:.::K'-----','--1§.:.±:IQ....~g60** .. _ OK 36.330 -101.050 OK 36.470 -100.250 OK 36.170 -99.530 

## ._--_....... 

### - ......**~~,** ..**,-,~** ...**,-,-''''''-,,~,~.**

_____ .----'O""K"'--_. 36.070
OK OK 36.320 34.440 32.250 -95.530 -98.530 -98.430 -99.410

_ ....____ ....___ A_MA

__

RI_L_L_O_m:!!!::J.:..;:..X

_____...::T.:.:X=--

__**}_5_.I~L** ...___._...**~19._~.:4_20**__ ClllLDRESS MUNI AP TX 34.260 -100.170 

# • 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# -. • 

# • •

-e 

# • • 

# • • 

# • ". 

# • 

# •

_.



# • • • Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Protocol 063701.0044 

# .• •

_

# •

# •

• 

# • • 

# •
• c. r- .... _ ..... __ ......**-.-.~.--------------------- ~!**  1773 CLARKSVILLE I W**~U~L** 

### ____ . __-=.C.=O=M:.::M..::E=R::.:C:.=E,--

_________:.:..:..

__=.:..=

__--'...:c==-_I**~.'-!.~.?L** ...__**<;:ON~OE** __ ._....__ . ____ . ___ __ DALLAS-FORT WORTWFORT. TX.**~l?~.~L** ........ - ............_ .. _ ........._..... . .................

### _ .............. __.... .**~-'-~.~** ______ ._**DA_l:LA~.LOYE ~!~LQ**  ___ . ______--"",,-_**~12404** DENTON 2 SE**~13284** FORT WORTH MEACHAM F**~.~285** ____.... FORT WORTH WSFO**~}370** ___**._£.~::.::S:..::Cc:::O**____ . ______ . ____

## -==--_**~..** GRAPEVINE DAM**~1409~_** .._. HEREFORD**~143??..._** .. ___**..!:fUN_.!~~** 

### _______...__._.::..:..:..__**~l~?IL__** JACKSBORO TX 33.140 -98.090**~IJ..'.~~.___._'=§.?9_N_GTO~** ....______.._ ..__ ._...__..:..TX""-_
.....**~,??L** 

### __... -97:.Q!Q_**~15411** LUBBOCKfLUBBOCK INTL TX. TX 33.390 -101.490**~15897** MlDLOTIDAN 2 TX 32.290 -97.000**~1958_._._** MINERAL WELLS MUN AP

___..:..TX",,-
__**..1~j70** .. _ ..__..J80'!,9..._._.**~_?.108** __....._._ MOUNT**PLEA~ANT** __ . __ . _____---'T;.:.X'--
_ _ 2JQQ..

__--=2.5_0_09_.**~!6177** NACOGDOCHES TX 31.370 -94.390**~!_6776** ...;:.P_A_M...;:P_A...;:2'--

________ ._..;:..TX"'-_--'.3c:...5
. .;:..34..:..:0'--_--=-I
..:c00"".c:...58",,0_
_ 1**~170~** PLAINS

________....:.T.:,:X'--

__..:3:.::.;.:31_10

___ :102500
__**4.!_~.~L** STEPHENVILLE I N TX 32.150 -98.120**~!!?:!.~** 

### .. __..**!Lu.r:-_PHl!.~Jf~(J~._.** 

### ___.._ .....___.._....:.T.:,:X'--_
..**_}l:.Q~L___~?}~_** 418942 TEXARKANA TX 33.250 -94.050 419532 WEATHERFORD TX 32.450 -97.460 419729 WlCIDTA FALLS/SHEPS AFB TX TX 33590 -98.300



### Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Protocol 063701.0044

•• .... ot 

### ,..**~**

# l 

# ..•• ::.,

# .••. 

# ., •• ; 

# •.•.**".~**

'''>'
. 37 36 35 34 33 .; 

### . ';<" ., Dodge Cily-E Prall-W Prall-E Wichita-W Wichita-E Joplin-W Joplin-E Springfield- W Springficld-E RolI.-W '. Pcrry1on-E Woodward-W Woodward-E. Enid-W Enid-E Tulsn-W**Tulsa~E** Harrison-W llarrison-E Poplar Bluff-W
Plainvlcw-E Chnlon-W Clinton-E Oklahoma Cily-W Oklahoma Cily-E FortSmilh-W FortSmilh-E Russcllvillc-W Russcllvillc-E Mcmphis-W
AmariUo-E Lawton-W Lawton-E Ardmorc-W Ardmorc-E Me Alcslcr-W Me Alcslcr-E LIllie Rock-W Lillie Rock-E Helen.-W
Lubbock-E Wichila Fall,·W Wichita Falls-E Shcrman-W Shennan-E Texarkana- W Texarkana-E EIDorado-W EI Dorado-E Greenwood-W ]0] ]00 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92



# !**~**

### ~**~** 

# ,**~.**. .**~** " "**.,~\~~:~~~** ' '. ,." '., -.. ;:'**>':':'(~~~~~** 

# .. ......... .:••**·'.J'.~I** List of US Uind Cover 

### (LULC) File,s (1 

### :250,000 km Format)

38.5
37.5
36.5
35.5 34.5 Dodge City Pratt Wichita Joplin Springfield Rolla Perryton Woodward Enid Tulsa Harrison Poplar Bluff
Plainview

Amarillo Clinton

Lawlon Oklahoma City

Ardmore Fort Smith
Me Alester, Antlers,

DeQueen, Mena Russellville, Conway, Flygap Mountain, Mountain View

Little Rock Memphis

Helena

Lubbock Wichita Falls Sherman Texarkana EI Dorado Greenwood 102 100 98, 

### 96 94 92

### ApPENDIX 

## C - MODEL INpUT/OUTPUT FILES

Lafarge Building Materials Trinity Consultants Refined BART Modeling Protocol 063701.0044