alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### City of New York, Acting by the Board of Transportation of the City of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Rita Casey, as Administratrix of the Estate of Walter J. Casey, Deceased, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

September 20, 1958.

*557
      *Peter Campbell Brown, Corporation Counsel,*for plaintiff.

*Konheim, Halpern S Wolf*for defendant.

James S. Bbowu, J.

In this third-party action instituted hy plaintiff as assignee pursuant to section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law defendant moves to dismiss the complaint for failure of the plaintiff to prosecute the action with due diligence, granting judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice and for summary judgment. The papers reveal that plaintiff’s assignor, who was an employee of plaintiff, was injured in an accident which occurred on June 20, 1950. A claim for workmen’s compensation was thereafter filed by the injured employee. On June 5 or 6, 1953 plaintiff, apparently pursuant to the provisions of section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, instituted the instant action even though no award for compensation had been made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Issue was joined by the service of the defendant’s answer on October 23,1953. On July 7,1955, Mr. Justice Olliffe denied defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. In connection with that application plaintiff submitted an affidavit in which it stated ‘ ‘ As soon as a decision is rendered by the Compensation Board on the claim of plaintiff’s assignor and employee, the plaintiff, the City of New York, will notice this case for trial.” On November 10,1955, the compensation board rendered a decision on the claim of the employee against plaintiff. Four years and eight months have elapsed since the joinder of issue and two years and eight months since the decision was rendered in the workmen’s compensation matter, and only when the instant motion was made did plaintiff attempt to place the case on the calendar. Plaintiff’s excuse that it was waiting to determine the permanency of the employee’s injuries before it would file its note of issue is not such a reasonable excuse as to warrant the exercise of the court’s discretion in denying the motion *(Brassner Mfg. Co.*v. *Consolidated Edison Co. of N. Y.,*1 A D 2d 840; *Taylor*v. *Savoy Ballroom Corp.,*3 A D 2d 675). The motion is granted.

The relief requested for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment becomes academic and the court does not pass upon them.

Settle order on notice.
Order entered January 9, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 01337
- CV
PAULA MOORE & ALL OCCUPANTS, Appellant s V. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BA NK, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Tex as Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 13
- 05404
- E 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellant Tina Miles’s January 6, 2014 motion for extension of time and ORDER her to provide , within twenty (20) days of the date of this order , written verification that she (1) has paid or made arra ngements to pay the reporter’s fee or (2) has been found entitled to proceed without prepayment of costs

.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Southeast Technical Services, Inc. ) ) Under ContractNo. W912QR-14-P-0077 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59805

Mr. Robert Gibson Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Jonathan R. Bryant, Esq.

Assistant District Counsel U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville ORDER OF DISMISSAL By Board Order dated 20 April 2015, the Board directed appellant to provide a valid mailing address and telephone number, show that appellant is represented by a person meeting the criteria ofBoard Rule 15(a), and file a complaint or designate the document entitled notice ofappeal as its complaint. By email dated 24 April 2015, appellant provided a mailing address, but did not otherwiserespond to the Board's Order. On 11 May 2015, appellant was ordered to fully respond to the Board's 20 April 2015 Order by 1June 2015. Afterthe deadline to provide a response passed, appellant called to request an extension oftime. The Board granted an extension until 12 June 2015. The Board has received no response. Since the Board cannot proceed without a representative meeting the requirements ofBoardRule 15(a), this appeal is dismissed. Dated: 22 June 2015

(Signatures continued) Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I concur 

# '"f

# 5 b PETERD. TING Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59805, Appeal ofSoutheast Technical Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION IX
 

75 Hawthorne Street
 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901
 

JUN 2 3 2011 

Mr. Robert D. Fletcher 

Deputy Executive Officer 

California Air Resources Board 

Post Office Box 2815 

Sacramento, California 95812 

Dear~her:

On June 14,20 II, the California Air Resources Board submitted revisions to the 

California State Implementation Plan. We have reviewed materials submitted with the 

following rule and found that it fulfills the completeness criteria in 40 Code of Federal 

Regulations Part 51, Appendix V. 

APCO/AQMO Rule# Rule Title 

San Joaquin Valley 3170 Federally Mandated Ozone 

Nonattainment Fee 

This addresses all revisions in this submittal. In the coming months we will review the 

complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 11 O(k). 

Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia G. Allen at 

(415) 947-4120. 

Sincerely, 

Deborah Jardan 

Director, Air Division 

cc:	 Mr. Seyed Sadredin, APCO 

San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD 

Mr. Michael Guzzetta, Manager 

Rule Evaluation Section 

Stationary Source Division 

Prillted 011 Raveled Paper
#### Jerry MONTOYA, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.

No. 89SC257.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Oct. 16, 1989.

Justice ROVIRA

would grant on the following issue:

Whether the court of appeals erred in overturning defendant’s conviction on the grounds that the jury had access to an *917unsworn videotaped statement of a witness during deliberations.

LOHR, J., does not participate.
Exhibit 10.3





Exhibit 10.3




SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

OF RALPH A. BEATTIE





This second amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement of
Ralph A. Beattie is entered into effective as of January 1, 2010, by and between
Capital Senior Living Corporation (the “Company”) and Ralph
A. Beattie (“Employee”).



WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into the Employment Agreement effective June 1,
1999, as amended by the First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated January 16, 2003 (the
“Employment Agreement”), and




WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to amend the Employment
Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the mutual promises of the parties hereto
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:




	 	1.	 	Paragraph 4(A) shall be deleted in its entirety and the following Paragraph
shall be added in its place: “Effective January 1, 2010, CSL shall pay to Employee a
base salary of an annual rate of not less than $350,115 per annum, subject to annual
adjustment on the anniversary of the Employment Commencement Date and paid in
approximately equal installments no less frequently than semi-monthly. An annual
bonus shall be paid as determined by the Compensation Committee. The Company shall
deduct from Employee’s compensation all applicable local, state, Federal or foreign
taxes, including, but not limited to, income tax, withholding tax, social security
tax and pension contributions (if any).”






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed on the 14 day of
April,
2010.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	COMPANY: CAPITAL SENIOR LIVING CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
Lawrence A. Cohen	 
	 
	 	EMPLOYEE:

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Ralph A. Beattie
 	 
	 	 	Ralph A. Beattie
##### 



|                |  |                                                                                                                                                                     
|--------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(CABLETEL LOGO) |  |                                                                                                                                                                     
|                |  | Head
Office:
230 Travail Road, Markham, Ontario L3S 3J1 Canada
Tel: (905) 475-1030      Fax: (905) 475-9571
Toll Free: 1-800-268-3231
Website: www.cabletelgroup.com



---

Exhibit 99.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, D. Gregory Walling, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cabletel
Communications Corp. (the Registrant), certifies that to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2002 of the Registrant (the Report):

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

|                                                                      |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ D. Gregory Walling

Name: D. Gregory Walling
Date: March 25, 2003 |  | 

78
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Capital Art, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2015 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Sean Goodchild, Chief Executive Officer, and David Morton, Chief Financial officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. Based on my knowledge, the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and



2. The information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations.



|                        |                        
|----------------------- | -----------------------
|Dated: January 15, 2016 | /s/ Sean Goodchild     
|                        | Sean Goodchild         
|                        | Chief Executive Officer





|                        |                        
|----------------------- | -----------------------
|Dated: January 15, 2016 | /s/ David Morton       
|                        | David Morton           
|                        | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                               Exhibit 11.1

                   GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.

                     COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                 (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Years Ended
                                                          ------------------------------
                                                            1998       1997       1996  
                                                          --------   --------   --------
<S>                                                       <C>        <C>        <C>

Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $  2,339   $ (5,104)  $(17,838)
                                                          ========   ========   ========

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding . . .    8,700      6,733      6,690

Weighted average effect of common share equivalents . . .      209          -          -
                                                          --------   --------   --------

Weighted average shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . .    8,909      6,733      6,690
                                                          ========   ========   ========

Net income (loss) per common share and common share
  equivalent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $   0.26   $  (0.76)  $  (2.67)
                                                          ========   ========   ========

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2.33 MB)

Tags:673d Logistic Readiness Squadron, MATERIEL MANAGEMENT, 673d LRS, 673d Logistics Readiness Group, JBER

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE>

                                                        EXHIBIT 32.1


             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                    THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Technology Funding Venture Partners V, An
Aggressive Growth Fund, L.P. (the Partnership) Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I Charles, R. Kokesh,
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Chairman of Technology Funding Inc. and Managing General Partner of
Technology Funding Ltd., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as added Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partnership as of
and for the period covered by the Report.

Date:  March 23, 2005      By:    /s/Charles R. Kokesh
                               --------------------------------
                                     Charles R. Kokesh
                                     President, Chief Executive
                                     Officer, Chief Financial
                                     Officer and Chairman of
                                     Technology Funding Inc. and
                                     Managing General Partner of
                                     Technology Funding Ltd.

Technology Funding Venture Partners V, L.P.
(a Delaware limited partnership)

Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AHMAD MOHAMMAD AL DARBI, Petitioner, v. BARACK OBAMA, et al. , Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 05-2371 (RCL)

ORDER Upon consideration of the Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Memorandum In Support of Petitioner’s Motion to Compel Production of Exculpatory Information and Automati c Discovery, and without objection by Respondents, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner’s time to file his reply memorandum is continued until October 5, 2009.

Signed by Royce C. Lamberth, Chief Judge, on September 25, 2009.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.62 MB)

Tags:NMCS, DVIDS Bulk Import

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
"Confidential treatment has been granted or requested with respect to
     portions of this exhibit, and such portions have been replaced with "**".
     Such confidential portions have been deleted and separately filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2."

                                AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                        TO
                      HIGH-DENSITY FRAM COOPERATION AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 2 ("Amendment No. 2") is made and entered into as of
March 11, 1996, by and between Ramtron International Corporation ("RAMTRON")
and Hitachi, Ltd. ("HITACHI"), with respect to the Amendment ("Amendment
No. 1") to the High-Density FRAM Cooperation Agreement dated September 21,
1995.

1.  Section 6.3 shall be further modified and read as follows.

6.3  Jointly Developed High-Density FRAM Technology

Trade Secret Rights, Copyrights and Mask Work Rights to Jointly Developed
High-Density FRAM Technology shall be jointly owned by the parties, with each
party having an undivided equal ownership interest.  Each party may
perpetually utilize Jointly Developed High-Density FRAM Technology    **   .

   **   .

2.  Unless specifically provided hereunder, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement and the Amendment No. 1 shall remain unchanged.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment No. 2 to be
executed by their duly authorized officers.

RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL              HITACHI, LTD.
CORPORATION

/S/ L. David Sikes                 /S/ Tokumasa Yasui
------------------                 ------------------
L. David Sikes                     Tokumasa Yasui
Chairman and CEO                   General Manager
                                   Memory Business Operation
                                   Semiconductor and Integrated Circuits Div.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
                                                                                

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF COST-U-LESS, INC.

                              AS OF MARCH 20, 1999


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   State of Incorporation
                                                    or Country in Which 
                   Subsidiary                            Organized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                 <C>
CULGUAM, Inc.                                       Guam
CULUSVI, Inc.                                       USVI
CULSAMOA, Inc.                                      American Samoa
CULNEV, Inc.                                        Nevada
CUL (CURACAO), NV                                   Netherlands Antilles
CULNZ, Ltd                                          New Zealand
CUL (FIJI), Ltd                                     Fiji
CUL (Saint Martin), NV                              Netherlands Antilles
CUL (ARUBA), NV                                     Netherlands Antilles
</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SE PTEMBER 19, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00566

- CR

Joe Ed Davis, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 391ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONE S, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over thi s appeal. Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.