### 57755 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 186 / Friday, September 25, 2015 / Proposed Rules

condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as a need to revise the maintenance program to include the revised airworthiness limitations for the internal wing structure and wing attachment inspections. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the wing structure and fuselage attachment due to undetected fatigue and corrosion.
(f) Actions and Compliance

Unless already done, before further flight after the effective date of this AD, insert the following into the Airworthiness Limitations section of the FAA-approved maintenance program ( e.g., maintenance manual). These revisions to the Limitations sections incorporate the wing spar inspection uponthe accumulation of 3,500 hours time-inservice (TIS) and requires a repetitive inspection thereafter every 750 hours TIS (the requirements of AD 2008–09–01):

(1) For S/Ns 001 through 378: Insert paragraph 3.4.9, Wing 3500 hr Inspection, on pages 3–3 and 3–4, dated August 2015, of Section 3: Airworthiness Limitations, Time Limits, & Maintenance Inspections, dated August 2015, of the APEX R2000 Service Manual S/N 001 to 378, Alpha Aviation Ltd.

(2) For S/Ns 160A–06001 and subsequent: Insert paragraph 3.4.9, Wing 3500 hr Inspection, on pages 3–3 and 3–4, dated August 2015, of Section 3: Airworthiness Limitations, Time Limits, & Maintenance Inspections, all dated August 2015, of the R2000 Service Manual, Alpha Aviation Ltd.
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions

The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–4146; fax: (816) 329–4090; email: karl.schletzbaum@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved.Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(h) Related Information

Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) AD DCA/R2000/43, dated August 7, 2015, for related information. You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–3956. For service information related to this AD, contact Alpha Aviation Holdings Limited, Steele Road, RD 2 Hamilton Airport, Hamilton 3282, New Zealand, telephone: +64 7 843 9877; fax: +64 7 929 2878; Internet: http://www.alphaaviation.co.nz/. You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148.

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 17, 2015. Melvin Johnson, Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–24149 Filed 9–24–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No.FAA–2015–3084; Airspace Docket No. 15–AGL–13]** 

**Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; International Falls, MN** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), correction.

**SUMMARY :**  This action makes a correction to the NPRM published in the Federal Register of August 27, 2015, proposing to establish Class E en route domestic airspace in the International Falls, MN area. Exclusionary reference to Canadian airspace was omitted from the regulatory text.

**DATES :**  Comments due date remains October 13, 2015.

**ADDRESSES :**  Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001. You must identify the docket number FAA–2015– 3084/Airspace Docket No. 15–AGL–13, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov

. You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1–800– 647–5527), is on the ground floor of the building at the above address.

FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air

_ traffic/ publications/. For further information, you can contact the Airspace Policy and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC, 20591; telephone: 202–267–8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/ federal

_register/code

_ of

_federalregulations/ibr

_locations.html

. FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is published yearly and effective on September 15.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Raul Garza, Jr., Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone: 817–868–
2927.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

History. A notice of proposed rulemaking was published in the Federal Register of August 27, 2015 (80 FR 51972). In the regulatory text of the proposed rule, exclusionary language was inadvertently omitted from the legal description of the airspace. This action makes the correction. The legal description is rewritten for clarity.
Proposed Amendment Correction

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, in the Federal Register of August 27, 2015 (80 FR 51972), FR Docket 2015–21087, the legal description on page 51973, column 2, beginning at line 31, is corrected to read as follows:

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**
AGL MN E6 International Falls, MN [Corrected]

That airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within an area bounded by lat. 49 ° 00 ′ 00 ′′ N., long.
095 ° 00 ′ 00 ′′ W.; to lat. 49 ° 00 ′00 ′′ N., long.
093 ° 30 ′ 00 ′′ W.; to lat. 48 ° 06 ′ 30 ′′ N., long.
090 ° 06 ′ 00 ′′ W.; to lat. 47 ° 53 ′00 ′′ N., long.
090 ° 55 ′ 00 ′′ W.; to lat. 48 ° 34 ′00 ′′ N., long.
094 ° 00 ′ 00 ′′ W.; to lat. 48 ° 40 ′ 00 ′′ N., long.
095 ° 00 ′ 00 ′′ W., thence to the point of beginning, excluding that airspace within Federal airways and within Canadian airspace.

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on September 9,

2015. Robert W. Beck, Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2015–24159 Filed 9–24–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**