### SIP CHECKLISTS

ADMINISTRATIVE & TECHNICAL Page 1 of 3

Administrative Materials for SIP submittal dated: February 2015

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof (hereafter “the plan”). The cover letter transmitting this proposed 110(l) Miscellaneous Rule Removal SIP

Revision is the formal letter of submission.

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement (hereafter “document”)

in final fo rm. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date.

The state removed Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(aaa), Consumer and Commercial Products; and Georg ia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(bbb), Gasoline Marketing; from the Georgia SIP; and revised Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(mmm), NOx Emissions from Stationary Gas Turbines and Stationary Engines used to Generate Electricity consistent with section 110 (l) of the CAA. These changes were adopted by the Board of Natural Resources on March 25, 2014, and were effective May 4 , 2014.

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. The Georgia Air Quality Act, Ar ticle 1: Air Quality (O.C.G.A. 12

- 9, et. seq.) provides the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the revisions. The Act, in its entirety, is located at http://www.lexi s

nexis.com/hottopics/gacode/ under Title 12, Chapter 9, Article 1.

4. A copy of the actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved pl an, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/ document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document sh all, whenever possible, be indicated in the document

itself.

Enclosed is a c opy of the affected plan for approval and incorporation into the State Implementation Plan.

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State’s laws and Constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan and compilation of public comments and the State’s response thereto. The procedural requirements associated with this plan and public comment period

are included in the su bmittal to EPA.

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice and Certification that public hearings(s) were held in accordance with the inform ation provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. Documentation for the public notice, hearing and comment requirements is

included in the submittal to EPA.

### SIP CHECKLISTS

ADMINISTRATIVE & TECHNICAL Page 2 of 3

Technical Support for SIP Submittal dated: January 201 5

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. The proposed plan covers all emissions associated with the removal of Georgia

Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(aaa), Consumer and Commercial Products; and Georgia Rule

391

- 3

- 1

-

. 02(2)(bbb), Gasoline Marketing and any associated with Georgia’s request to revise Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(mmm), NOx Emissions from Stationary Gas Turbines and Stationary Engines used to Generate Electricity.

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources includi ng the EPA
attainment/non

- attainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected areas(s).

Ge orgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(aaa) is applicable to nonattainment areas classified

as severe ozone nonattainment areas. The Me tro Atlanta Nonattainment Area was designated serious for the previous 1

- hour ozone NAAQS. This plan for this area includes the following counties: Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Paulding, and Rockdale.
G eorgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(bbb) and Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(mmm), apply

to the expanded 45

- county nonattainment area. Th is area includes the following

counties: Banks, Barrow, Bartow, Butts, Carroll, Chattooga, Cherokee, Clarke, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, Dawson, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Floyd, Forsyth, Fulton, Gordon, Gwinnett, Hall, Haralson, Heard, Henry, Jackson, Jasper, Jones, Lamar, Lumpkin, Madison, Meriwether, Monroe, Morgan, Newton, Oconee, Paulding, Pickens, Pike, Polk, Putnam, Rock dale , Spalding, Troup, Upson, and

Walton

.

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision.

Emissions are discussed in Sections 2, 3, and 4

.

4. The State’s demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. For all requests to redes ignate an area to attainment for a national primary ambient air quality standard, under section 107 of the Act, a revision must be submitted to provide for the maintenance of the national primary ambient air quality standards for at least 10 years as requi red by section 175A of

the Act.

Removal of this rule from Georgia’s State Implementation Plan is consistent with section 110 (l) of the CAA.

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used , justification of model selections, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data

### SIP CHECKLISTS

ADMINISTRATIVE & TECHNICAL Page 3 of 3

(where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the model ing analysis. Modeling is discussed in Section 5.0

.

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. This requirement is not applicable for this revision.

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensure emission

levels.

Removal of this rule from Georgia’s State Implementation Plan is consistent with section 110 (l) of the CAA.

8. Compliance /enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice.
Enforcement will be carried out as described in the State/EPA Enforcement Agreement.

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA pol icies, or an explanation of why such justifications are not necessary. No special economic or technological justifications are required for this proposed

p lan.