Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 156 / Wednesday, August 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 47377 

Environmental Impact 

This final rule involves a rate or cost 

determination and a related fiscal 

requirement that do not constitute a 

development decision affecting the 

physical condition of specific project 

areas or building sites. Accordingly, 

under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(6), this final rule 

is categorically excluded from 

environmental review under the 

National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321). 

Federalism Impact 

Executive Order 13132 (entitled 

‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits, to the extent 

practicable and permitted by law, an 

agency from promulgating a regulation 

that has federalism implications and 

either imposes substantial direct 

compliance costs on State and local 

governments and is not required by 

statute, or preempts State law, unless 

the relevant requirements of section 6 of 

the Executive Order are met. This rule 

does not have federalism implications 

and does not impose substantial direct 

compliance costs on State and local 

governments or preempt State law 

within the meaning of the Executive 

Order. 

List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 3284 

Consumer protection, Manufactured 

homes. 

Accordingly, for the reasons 

discussed in this preamble, HUD 

amends 24 CFR part 3284 as follows: 

PART 3284—MANUFACTURED 

HOUSING PROGRAM FEE 

■ 1. The authority citation for 24 CFR 

part 3284 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), 5419, and 

5424. 

■ 2. Revise § 3284.5 to read as follows: 

§ 3284.5 Amount of fee. 

Each manufacturer, as defined in 

§ 3282.7 of this chapter, must pay a fee 

of $100 per transportable section of each 

manufactured housing unit that it 

manufactures under the requirements of 

part 3280 of this chapter. 

Dated: August 8, 2014. 

Carol J. Galante, 

Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal 

Housing Commissioner. 

[FR Doc. 2014–19173 Filed 8–12–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0046; FRL–9913–15– 

Region 5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois; 

Amendments to Vehicle Inspection and 

Maintenance Program for Illinois 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving a state 

implementation plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the Illinois Environmental 

Protection Agency on November 29, 

2012, concerning the state’s vehicle 

inspection and maintenance (I/M) 

program in the Chicago and Metro-East 

St. Louis ozone nonattainment areas in 

Illinois. The revision amends I/M 

program requirements in the active 

control measures portion of the ozone 

SIP to reflect changes that have been 

implemented at the state level since 

EPA fully approved the I/M program on 

February 22, 1999. The submittal also 

includes a demonstration under section 

110(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) 

addressing lost emission reductions 

associated with the program changes. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

September 12, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0046. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., Confidential Business Information 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone 

Francisco J. Acevedo, Mobile Source 

Program Manager, at (312) 886–6061, 

before visiting the Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Francisco J. Acevedo, Mobile Source 

Program Manager, Control Strategies 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6061, 

acevedo.francisco@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What is being addressed by this document? 

II. What is our response to comments 

received on the notice of proposed 

rulemaking? 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is being addressed by this 

document? 

On November 14, 2013, at 78 FR 

68378, EPA proposed to approve into 

the state’s Federally-approved SIP 

several regulatory changes to the 

previously approved I/M program 

operating in the Chicago and Metro-East 

St. Louis ozone nonattainment areas in 

Illinois. The most significant changes to 

the Illinois I/M program took effect 

beginning on February 1, 2007 and 

include: 

• The elimination of the IM240 

transient mode exhaust test for all 

vehicles beginning February 1, 2007. 

• The elimination of the evaporative 

system integrity (gas cap pressure) test 

for all on-board diagnostics (OBD) 

compliant vehicles beginning February 

1, 2007. 

• The replacement of the computermatching enforcement mechanism with 

a registration denial based system 

beginning January 1, 2008. 

• The elimination of the steady-state 

idle exhaust and evaporative integrity 

(gas cap pressure) testing for all vehicles 

beginning February 1, 2012. 

• The exemption of pre-2007 model 

year (MY) heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) 

with gross vehicle weight rating 

(GVWR) between 8,501 and 14,000 

pounds beginning February 1, 2012. 

• The exemption of all HDVs with a 

GVWR greater than 14,000 pounds as of 

February 1, 2012. 

• The requirement of OBD pass/fail 

testing for all 2007 and newer OBDcompliant HDVs. 

In addition to the changes discussed 

above, the November 29, 2012, 

submittal included a number of minor 

revisions to the program that do not 

have a significant impact on overall 

program operations or the emissions 

reductions associated with it. A full list 

of the regulatory changes submitted by 

Illinois for EPA approval includes: 

• VEIL of 2005, as amended, 625 ILCS 

5/13C (Public Act 94–526 enacted on 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
47378 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 156 / Wednesday, August 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

August 10, 2005; Public Act 94–848 

enacted on June 9, 2006; Public Act 97– 

106, enacted on July 14, 2011). 

• Revisions to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 240 

(R11–19 effective March 18, 2011 (35 Ill. 

Reg. 5552 (April 1, 2011)); R12–12 

effective February 1, 2012 (36 Ill. Reg. 

1066 (January 27, 2012)). 

• Revisions to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 276 

effective June 28, 2011 (35 Ill. Reg. 

11268) and January 30, 2012 (36 Ill. Reg. 

2257). 

II. What is our response to comments 

received on the notice of proposed 

rulemaking? 

The November 14, 2013, proposal 

provided a 30-day review and comment 

period. The comment period closed on 

December 16, 2013. EPA received 

comments from two parties during the 

public comment period. One was 

supportive of our proposed action. We 

are responding to the second commenter 

who disagreed with our action. 

Comment. The commenter notes that 

the primary concern with EPA’s 

proposed approval of Illinois’ SIP 

revision is ensuring it is not counterproductive to compliance of the 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). The commenter states that 

compliance with these standards should 

be a prerequisite for considering such 

revisions to ensure timely attainment of 

all applicable NAAQS. The commenter 

further claims that the SIP revision 

would limit Illinois’ ability to reduce its 

precursor emissions, interfere with 

attainment of multiple NAAQS, and 

place additional burden on neighboring 

states. 

Response. States have primary 

responsibility for deciding how to attain 

and maintain the NAAQS. In reviewing 

SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to 

approve state choices, provided that 

they meet minimum criteria set by the 

CAA or any applicable EPA regulations. 

To ensure that impacts on the NAAQS 

are considered, any change submitted to 

EPA for approval must include a 

demonstration of non-interference with 

the NAAQS, pursuant to section 110(l) 

of the CAA. In the absence of an 

attainment demonstration, to 

demonstrate non-interference with any 

applicable NAAQS or requirement of 

the CAA under section 110(l), EPA’s 

policy is that states may substitute 

equivalent emissions reductions to 

compensate for any change to a SIP 

approved program, to ensure that actual 

emissions in the air are not increased. 

Allowing states to use substitute 

equivalent emissions to address section 

110(l) provides states with flexibility, 

while not interfering with attainment or 

maintenance of the NAAQS. The 

compensating equivalent reductions 

must represent permanent emissions 

reductions achieved in a 

contemporaneous time frame to the 

change of the existing SIP control 

measure, in order to ensure that there is 

no degradation of air quality. 

As outlined in EPA’s proposed 

approval, Illinois’ SIP revision includes 

such a demonstration using equivalent 

emissions reductions achieved through 

the shutdown of permitted emission 

sources to compensate for emission 

reduction losses resulting from changes 

to the I/M program that was approved 

into the SIP in 1999 (64 FR 8517 (Feb. 

22, 1999). In the Chicago nonattainment 

area, Illinois identified 1,168 facilities 

with permitted volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions and 687 

facilities with permitted nitrogen oxides 

(NOX) emissions that have permanently 

closed and have expired permits that 

have been revoked. 

In the Metro-East St. Louis 

nonattainment area, Illinois identified 

82 facilities with permitted VOC 

emissions and 39 facilities with 

permitted NOX emissions that have 

permanently closed and have expired 

permits that have been revoked. These 

sources all ceased operations within the 

same timeframe of Illinois 

implementing the revisions to the I/M 

program. At this point, these sources 

have all been shutdown for at least two 

years. 

EPA has a well-established policy that 

reactivation of a permanently shutdown 

facility will be treated as operation of a 

new source for purposes of Prevention 

of Significant Deterioration (PSD) 

review. See In the Matter of Monroe 

Electric Generating Plant, Entergy 

Louisiana, Inc. Proposed Operating 

Permit, Petition No. 6–99–2, Order 

Partially Granting and Partially Denying 

Petition for Objection to Permit (June 11, 

1999) at p.8 & n.9 (citing authorities). In 

general, whether a shutdown is treated 

as permanent depends on the facts and 

circumstances, although shutdowns of 

more than two years or that result in 

removal of a source from the state’s 

emissions inventory are presumed to be 

permanent. 

EPA has determined, for the sources 

identified in the record as part of 

Illinois’ submission, that these sources 

are permanently shutdown for purposes 

of PSD. Any restart of operations, and 

associated emissions, at these sites will 

be treated as a new sources, subject to 

the requirements of the PSD program. In 

addition, the state’s 110(l) 

demonstration indicates that the 

reductions achieved by the source 

shutdowns occurred during the same 

timeframe as the increased emissions 

from the modified I/M program. As a 

result, EPA believes it is reasonable for 

Illinois to use the reductions in actual 

emissions of ozone precursors resulting 

from the shutdown of these sources as 

offsets for any increases in emissions of 

ozone precursors associated with the 

changes to the I/M program. 

A review of Illinois’ 110(l) 

demonstration shows that the emissions 

reductions of both VOC and NOX

emissions far exceed the increase in 

emissions resulting from the revised I/ 

M program. EPA finds that the net result 

of these changes will not interfere with 

attainment and maintenance of the 

ozone, or other, NAAQS. 

Comment. The same commenter also 

included an analysis that it claims 

demonstrates that the changes to the 

Illinois I/M program resulted in an 

increase in precursor emissions for 

ozone. The commenter further states 

that the increase in emissions resulting 

from the Illinois I/M program changes 

alone (or largely) was responsible for the 

monitored violation of the 2008 ozone 

standard at the Zion, IL monitor. The 

commenter points to a photochemical 

modeling analysis conducted by the 

commenter, showing that the decreased 

effectiveness in the emission reduction 

potential of the Illinois I/M program 

equates to an increase in ozone 

concentrations. The commenter argues 

that because the State has been 

implementing the modified program 

since 2007, any analysis should not be 

based solely on emissions modeling or 

speculative results, but supported by 

actual monitoring data that 

demonstrates compliance with the 

applicable air quality standards as well. 

The commenter points to multiple 

monitored violations of the standard 

that have occurred in Illinois 

subsequent to these I/M program 

changes, and claims that such 

monitored violations provide strong 

indication that the current controls and 

current approved SIP are inadequate to 

support attainment of the 2008 ozone 

standard and are also insufficient to 

support attainment of the 2012 standard 

for fine particles as well. 

Response. The commenter’s 

photochemical modeling analysis 

referenced above only reflects the 

impacts of the changes made to the 

Illinois I/M program. The analysis 

however fails to take into consideration 

the emissions reductions achieved 

through the shutdown of permitted 

emission sources that Illinois relies on 

to compensate for the emission 

reduction losses resulting from changes 

to the February 22, 1999, SIP approved 

I/M program. When the compensating 

emission reductions being used by 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 156 / Wednesday, August 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 47379 

Illinois to address 110(l) are taken into 

account in the commenter’s analysis, 

the direct link between the violating 

monitoring data and the I/M program 

changes claimed by the commenter can 

no longer be supported. The 

compensating emission reductions of 

both VOC and NOX emissions far exceed 

the increase in emissions resulting from 

the revised I/M program and ensure that 

there is no net increase in precursor 

emissions resulting from the approval of 

the I/M program changes. EPA believes 

that, had the commenter modeled the 

ozone impact of the combined increased 

emissions from the I/M revision and the 

decrease in emissions from the 

offsetting emission reductions, the 

commenter would have modeled a net 

decrease in peak downwind ozone 

concentrations. In addition, Illinois’ 

analysis also shows that the emission 

reduction losses resulting from the 

changes to the I/M program continue to 

significantly decline through 2025 while 

the compensating emission reductions 

being relied on during the same time 

period do not. The commenter’s claims 

that Illinois’ current control measures 

and current approved SIP are 

inadequate to support attainment of the 

2008 ozone and 2012 fine particle 

standards are outside the scope of this 

action. As stated before, any SIP 

revision submitted to EPA for 

consideration needs to include a 

demonstration of non-interference with 

the NAAQS under section 110(l) of the 

CAA to ensure that impacts on the 

NAAQS are considered. Illinois’ SIP 

revision included such a demonstration 

and EPA has determined that Illinois’ 

use of substitute emission reductions 

does not affect timely attainment of all 

applicable NAAQS. 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is approving the revisions to the 

Illinois ozone SIP submitted on 

November 29, 2012, concerning the I/M 

program in Illinois. EPA finds that the 

revisions meet all applicable 

requirements and will not interfere with 

reasonable further progress or 

attainment of any of the national 

ambient air quality standards. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by October 14, 2014. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: June 23, 2014. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. Section 52.720 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(200) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.720 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(200) On November 29, 2012, the 

Illinois Environmental Protection 

Agency submitted a request to revise 

Illinois’ vehicle inspection and 

maintenance (I/M) program to reflect 

changes that have been made to the 

program since EPA fully approved the I/ 

M program on February 22, 1999. 

(i) Incorporation by reference. 

(A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 

35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle 

B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution 

Control Board, Subchapter k: Emission 

Standards and Limitations for Mobile 

Sources, Part 240 Mobile Sources. 

Effective February 1, 2012. 

(B) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 

35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle 

B: Air Pollution, Chapter II: 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
47380 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 156 / Wednesday, August 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

Environmental Protection Agency, Part 

276 Procedures to be Followed in the 

Performance of Inspections of Motor 

Vehicle Emissions. Effective January 30, 

2012. 

(ii) Other materials. 

(A) Transmittal letter dated November 

29, 2012. 

(B) Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law 

of 2005, as amended, 625 ILCS 5/13C 

(Public Act 94–526 enacted on August 

10, 2005; Public Act 94–848 enacted on 

June 9, 2006; Public Act 97–106, 

enacted on July 14, 2011). 

(C) Listing of Chicago and Metro-East 

St. Louis NAA Facility Closures (July 

2012). 

[FR Doc. 2014–17331 Filed 8–12–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MB Docket No. 14–37; RM–11711; DA 14– 

1059] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; 

Haynesville, Louisiana 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Audio Division, at the 

request of SSR Communications, Inc., 

allots Channel 286A at Haynesville, 

Louisiana, as a ‘‘backfill’’ allotment to 

prevent the removal of the community’s 

potential first local service that 

accommodates the ‘‘hybrid’’ application 

for Station KIMW, Channel 288A from 

Haynesville, Louisiana, to Heflin, 

Louisiana. A staff engineering analysis 

indicates that Channel 286A can be 

allotted to Haynesville consistent with 

the minimum distance separation 

requirements of the Commission’s rules 

with a site restriction 4.6 kilometers (2.9 

miles) south of the community. The 

reference coordinates are 33–00–12 NL 

and 93–08–19 WL. 

DATES: Effective September 8, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 

Twelfth Street SW., Washington, DC 

20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2700. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Report 

and Order, adopted July 24, 2014, and 

released July 25, 2014. The full text of 

this Commission decision is available 

for inspection and copying during 

normal business hours in the FCC’s 

Reference Information Center at Portals 

II, CY–A257, 445 Twelfth Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. This document 

may also be purchased from the 

Commission’s duplicating contractors, 

Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th 

Street SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1– 

800–378–3160 or via email 

www.BCPIWEB.com. This document 

does not contain proposed information 

collection requirements subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13. The Commission 

will send a copy of this Report and 

Order in a report to be sent to Congress 

and the Government Accountability 

Office pursuant to the Congressional 

Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Radio, Radio broadcasting. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Nazifa Sawez, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media 

Bureau. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Federal Communications 

Commission amends 47 CFR part 73 as 

follows: 

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336 

and 339. 

§ 73.202 [Amended] 

■ 2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM 

Allotments under Louisiana, is 

amended by removing Channel 288A at 

Haynesville, and by adding Channel 

286A at Haynesville. 

[FR Doc. 2014–19162 Filed 8–12–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 14–1060] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; Various 

Locations 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Audio Division amends 

the FM Table of Allotments (‘‘FM 

Table’’) to remove certain vacant FM 

allotments that were auctioned in FM 

Auction 79 that are currently considered 

authorized stations. FM assignments for 

authorized stations and reserved 

facilities will be reflected solely in 

Media Bureau’s Consolidated Database 

System (CDBS). 

DATES: Effective August 13, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2700. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Commission’s Report 

and Order, DA 14–1060, adopted July 

24, 2014, and released July 25, 2014. 

The full text of this Commission 

decision is available for inspection and 

copying during normal business hours 

in the Commission’s Reference Center 

445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 

20554. The complete text of this 

decision may also be purchased from 

the Commission’s duplicating 

contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 

445 12th Street SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20054, telephone 1– 

800–378–3160 or www.BCPIWEB.com. 

The Commission will not send a copy 

of this Report and Order pursuant to the 

Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 

801(a)(1)(A), because the adopted rules 

are rules of particular applicability. This 

document does not contain proposed 

information collection requirements 

subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act 

of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition, 

therefore, it does not contain any 

proposed information collection burden 

‘‘for small business concerns with fewer 

than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the 

Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 

2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4). 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Radio, Radio broadcasting. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Nazifa Sawez, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media 

Bureau. 

As stated in the preamble, the Federal 

Communications Commission amends 

47 CFR part 73 as follows: 

PART 73—RADIO BROADCASTING 

SERVICES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336 

and 339. 

§ 73.202 [Amended] 

■ 2. Amend § 73.202(b) Table of FM 

Allotments as follows: 

■ a. Remove Boligee, under Alabama, 

Channel 297A; and Maplesville, 

Channel 292A. 

■ b. Remove Grand Canyon Village, 

under Arizona, Channel 273C1; and 

Channel 268C3 at Peach Springs. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES