UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-KSB

[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Fee Required)

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1999

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(No Fee Required)

For the Transition Period from_________________to________________________

Commission File Number 000-23261

SNB BANCSHARES, INC.

(Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)

GEORGIA

State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization

58-2107916

(I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization Identification No.)

2918 RIVERSIDE DRIVE

MACON, GEORGIA 31204

(Address of Principal Executive Offices

Issuer's Telephone Number (912) 722-6200

Securities Registered Under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: NONE

Securities Registered Under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

COMMON STOCK, $1.00 PAR VALUE

(Title of Class)



Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. XYes No

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Items 405 of Regulation S-B in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ X ]

State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $23,475,142 for year ended December 31, 1999.

State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such stock, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. $52,614,828
Based on Prices as of March 3, 2000.

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date.

3,340,624 shares of $1.00 par value common stock as of December 31, 1999.



DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant's Annual Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of stockholders on April 29, 1999 are incorporated by reference into Part III.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes XNo

Part I

Item 1

BUSINESS

General

SNB Bancshares, Inc. (SNB) is a Georgia corporation formed to act as a bank holding company for Security Bank of Bibb County ("SB-Bibb") under the Federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and the bank holding company laws of Georgia.
SNB was incorporated on February 10, 1994 at the instruction of management of SB-Bibb. At a special meeting of the shareholders of SB-Bibb on August 2, 1994, the shareholders of SB-Bibb voted in favor of a plan of reorganization and agreement of merger
pursuant to which SB-Bibb became a wholly-owned subsidiary of SNB. The reorganization was effective on September 30, 1994, as a result of which the shares of common stock of SB-Bibb then issued and outstanding were converted into shares of the common
stock of SNB. SB-Bibb has operated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of SNB since that time, although the functions and business of SB-Bibb, its Board of Directors, staff and physical office locations underwent no changes as a result of the reorganization.

On August 8, 1998, SNB acquired a 100 percent interest in Crossroads Bancshares, Inc., the parent holding company of Security Bank of Houston County (formerly Crossroads Bank of Georgia) ("SB-Houston") in Perry and Warner Robins, Georgia. The two
companies merged in a pooling of interests stock swap transaction and, accordingly, all prior financial information shown below has been restated as if this business combination had always existed. The parent company of SB-Houston was subsequently
dissolved. SB-Houston now operates as a wholly-owned subsidiary of SNB.

History and Business of the Subsidiaries

Substantially all of the business of SNB is conducted through its two subsidiary banks. A brief description of each Bank's history and business operations is discussed below.

SB-BIBB

SB-Bibb is a state-chartered bank which engages in the commercial banking business primarily in Bibb County, Georgia. SB-Bibb commenced operations on November 4, 1988. The Bank now operates six full-service offices in Macon, Georgia and has a
mortgage loan office in Warner Robins, Georgia. On March 1, 1999, the Bank converted its banking charter from a national to a state charter and changed its name from Security National Bank to Security Bank of Bibb County.

The Bank offers a full range of deposit products, lending services (including a specialized mortgage division), internet banking, automated teller machines, safe deposit boxes, credit cards, night depositories and other services for the convenience of
its customers. No trust services are currently offered. The Bank provides its own data processing services.

As of December 31, 1999, SB-Bibb had total assets of $188.3 million, total deposits of $155.4 million and total stockholders' equity of $15.2 million. Net income amounted to $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 1999.





Part I (Continued)

Item 1 (Continued)

SB-HOUSTON

SB-Houston commenced operation in 1987 as a state-chartered bank in Perry, Houston County, Georgia. The Bank currently operates four full-service facilities in Houston County, having added two full-service branches in Warner Robins, Georgia.
SB-Houston's main office remains at 1208 Washington Street, Perry, Georgia. The Bank established its fourth full-service office during the first quarter of 2000. This office is located on Houston Lake Road in Warner Robins.

SB-Houston operates a full-service commercial banking business and provides a wide range of banking services, including checking and savings accounts, a broad range of certificates of deposit, agricultural, consumer, commercial and real estate loans,
internet banking, safe deposit boxes, credit cards, night depositories and 24-hour automated teller machines. SB-Houston's customers reside mainly in the Houston County area. No trust services are currently offered. Data services are provided by SB-Bibb.

As of December 31, 1999, SB-Houston had total assets of $94.3 million, total deposits of $86.0 million, and stockholders' equity of $7.4 million. Net income for the year ended December 31, 1999 totaled $1.2 million.

Market Area

SNB primarily serves the residents of Bibb and Houston counties, with estimated populations of 156,000 and 105,000, respectively, as of July 1998. SNB also conducts business to a lesser extent in the surrounding counties of Jones, Monroe, Twiggs,
Crawford, Peach and Wilkinson. The loan portfolio is concentrated in various commercial, real estate and consumer loans to individuals and entities located in middle Georgia, and the ultimate collectiblity of the loans and future growth of the Company are
largely dependent upon economic conditions in the middle Georgia area. The Company's agricultural loans are negligible. The economy of the middle Georgia area has been generally favorable in recent years, although population growth has been moderate at
best. Robins Air Force Base, located in Houston County, is a major employer in the area, which has survived national base closure mandates and expanded in size in recent years.

Competition

The financial services industry in the middle Georgia area is highly competitive. SNB's subsidiary banks compete actively with national and state chartered banks, savings and loan associations and credit unions for loans and deposits. In addition,
the Banks compete with other financial service institutions, including brokers and dealers, insurance companies and finance companies, all of which actively engage in marketing various types of loans, deposits and other services. Management believes that
competitive pricing and personalized service will provide it with a method to compete effectively in the middle Georgia area.

Employees

As of December 31, 1999, the Company had 130 employees on a full-time equivalent basis. SNB considers its relationship with its employees to be excellent.



Part I (Continued)

Item 1 (Continued)



Supervision and Regulation

Bank holding companies and banks are regulated under both federal and state law. The following is a brief summary of certain statutes and rules and regulations affecting the Company, the Bank, and to a more limited extent the Company s subsidiaries.

This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statute and regulatory provision referred to and is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the statutes or regulations applicable to the business of the Company and its
subsidiaries. The scope of regulation and permissible activities of the Company and its subsidiaries is subject to change by future federal and state legislation. Supervision, regulation and examination of the Company and the Bank by the bank regulatory
agencies are intended primarily for the protection of depositors rather than shareholders of the Company.

Regulation of the Company

SNB is a registered holding company under the Federal Bank Holding Company Act and the Georgia Bank Holding Company Act and is regulated under such Act by the Federal Reserve and by the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance (the "Georgia
Department"), respectively. As a bank holding company, the Company is required to file annual reports with the Federal Reserve and the Georgia Department and provide such additional information as the applicable regulator may require pursuant to the
Federal and Georgia Bank Holding Company Acts. The Federal Reserve and the Georgia Department may also conduct examinations of the Company to determine whether the Company is in compliance with Bank Holding Company Acts and regulations promulgated
thereunder.

In addition, the Federal Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before: (1) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5 percent of the voting shares of any
bank; (2) acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of a bank; and (3) before merging or consolidating with another bank holding company.

The Georgia Department requires similar approval prior to the acquisition of any additional banks from every Georgia bank holding company. A Georgia bank holding company is generally prohibited from acquiring ownership or control of 5 percent or more
of the voting shares of a bank unless the bank being acquired is either a bank for purposes of the Federal Bank Holding Company Act, or a federal or state savings and loan association or savings bank or federal savings bank whose deposits are insured by
the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation and such bank has been in existence and continuously operating as a bank for a period of five years or more prior to the date of application to the Department for approval of such acquisition.

The Federal Reserve (pursuant to regulation and published statements) has maintained that a bank holding company must serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary banks. In adhering to the Federal Reserve policy, the Company may be
required to provide financial support to the Bank at a time when, absent such Federal Reserve policy, the Company may not deem it advisable to provide such assistance. Similarly, the Federal Reserve also monitors the financial performance and prospects of
nonbank subsidiaries with an inspection process to ascertain whether such nonbanking subsidiaries enhance or detract from the Company s ability to serve as a source of strength for the Bank.

Part I (Continued)

Item 1 (Continued)

Capital Requirements

The holding company is subject to regulatory capital requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve applied on a consolidated basis with the bank owned by the holding company. Bank holding companies must have capital (as defined in the rules) equal to
eight (8) percent of risk-weighted assets. The risk weights assigned to assets are based primarily on credit risk. For example, securities with an unconditional guarantee by the United States government are assigned the least risk category. A risk weight
of 50 percent is assigned to loans secured by owner-occupied one-to-four family residential mortgages. The aggregate amount of assets assigned to each risk category is multiplied by the risk weight assigned to that category to determine the weighted
values, which are added together to determine total risk-weighted assets.

The Federal Reserve also requires the maintenance of minimum capital leverage ratios to be used in tandem with the risk-based guidelines in assessing the overall capital adequacy of bank holding companies. The guidelines define capital as either Tier 1
(primarily shareholder equity) or Tier 2 (certain debt instruments and a portion of the allowance for loan losses). Tier 1 capital for banking organizations includes common equity, minority interest in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries,
qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and qualifying cumulative perpetual preferred stock. (Cumulative perpetual preferred stock is limited to 25 percent of Tier 1 capital.) Tier 1 capital excludes goodwill; amounts of mortgage servicing
assets, nonmortgage servicing assets, and purchased credit card relationships that, in the aggregate, exceed 100 percent of Tier 1 capital; nonmortgage servicing assets and purchased credit card relationships that in the aggregate,exceed 25 percent of Tier
1

capital; all other identifiable intangible assets; and deferred tax assets that are dependent upon future taxable income, net of their valuation allowance, in excess of certain limitations.

Effective June 30, 1998, the Board has established a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of 3.0 percent for strong bank holding companies (rated composite "1" under the BOPEC rating system of bank holding companies), and for bank holding
companies that have implemented the Board's risk-based capital measure for market risk. For all other bank holding companies, the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets is 4.0 percent. Banking organizations with supervisory, financial,
operational, or managerial weaknesses, as well as organizations that are anticipating or experiencing significant growth, are expected to maintain capital ratios well above the minimum levels. Higher capital ratios may be required for any bank holding
company if warranted by its particular circumstances or risk profile. Bank holding companies are required to hold capital commensurate with the level and nature of the risks, including the volume and severity of problem loans, to which they are exposed.

At December 31, 1999, SNB exceeded the minimum Tier 1, risk-based and leverage ratios. The table which follows sets forth certain capital information for the Company as of December 31, 1999.

Part I (Continued)

Item 1 (Continued)

|CAPITAL ADEQUACY
($ in Thousands)
|---------------------------------
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|Leverage Ratio                   
|Actual                           
|Minimum Required (1)             
|                                 
|Risked-Based Capital:            
|                                 
|Tier 1 Capital                   
|Actual                           
|Minimum Required                 
|                                 
|Total Capital                    
|Actual                           
|Minimum Required                 

1. Represents the minimum requirement. Institutions that are contemplating acquisitions or anticipating or experiencing significant growth may be required to maintain a substantially higher leverage ratio.

The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act

Prior to the enactment of the Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the "Riegle-Neal Act"), interstate expansion of bank holding companies was prohibited, unless such acquisition was specifically authorized by a statute of the
state in which the target bank was located. Pursuant to the Riegle-Neal Act, effective September 29, 1995, an adequately capitalized and adequately managed holding company may acquire a bank across state lines, without regard to whether such acquisition
is permissible under state law. A bank holding company is considered to be "adequately capitalized" if it meets all applicable federal regulatory capital standards.

While the Riegle-Neal Act precludes a state from entirely insulating its banks from acquisition by an out-of-state holding company, a state may still provide that a bank may not be acquired by an out-of-state company unless the bank has been in
existence for a specified number of years, not to exceed five years. Additionally, the Federal Reserve is directed not to approve an application for the acquisition of a bank across state lines if: (i) the applicant bank holding company, including all
affiliated insured depository institutions, controls or after the acquisition would control, more than ten (10) percent of the total amount of deposits of all insured depository institutions in the United States (the "ten percent concentration limit") or
(ii) the acquisition would result in the holding company controlling thirty (30) percent or more of the total deposits of insured depository institutions in any state in which the holding company controlled a bank or branch immediately prior to the
acquisition (the "thirty percent concentration limit"). States may waive the thirty percent concentration limit, or may make the limits more or less restrictive, so long as they do no discriminate against out-of-state bank holding companies.

Part I (Continued)

Item 1 (Continued)

The Riegle-Neal Act also provides that, beginning on June 1, 1997, banks located in different states may merge and operate the resulting institution as a bank with interstate branches. However, a state may (i) prevent interstate branching through
mergers by passing a law prior to June 1, 1997 that expressly prohibits mergers involving out-of-state banks, or (ii) permit such merger transactions prior to June 1, 1997. Under the Riegle-Neal Act, an interstate merger transaction may involve the
acquisition of a branch of an insured bank without the acquisition of the bank itself, but only if the law of the state in which the branch is located permits this type of transaction.

Under the Riegle-Neal Act, a state may impose certain conditions on a branch of an out-of-state bank resulting from an interstate merger so long as such conditions do not have the effect of discriminating against out-of-state banks or bank holding
companies, other than on the basis of a requirement of nationwide reciprocal treatment. The ten (10) percent concentration limit and the thirty (30) percent concentration limit described above, as well as the rights of the states to modify or waive the
thirty (30) percent concentration limit, apply to interstate bank mergers in the same manner as they apply to the acquisition of out-of-state banks.

A bank resulting from an interstate merger transaction may retain and operate any office that any bank involved in the transaction was operating immediately before the transaction. After completion of the transaction, the resulting bank may establish
or acquire additional branches at any location where any bank involved in the transaction could have established or acquired a branch. The Riegle-Neal Act also provides that the appropriate federal banking agency may approve an application by a bank to
establish and operate an interstate branch in any state that has in effect a law that expressly permits all out-of-state banks to establish and operate such a branch.

In response to the Riegle-Neal Act, effective June 1, 1997, Georgia permitted interstate branching, although only through merger and acquisition. In addition, Georgia law provides that a bank may not be acquired by an out-of-state company unless the
bank has been in existence for five years. Georgia has also adopted the thirty percent concentration limit, but permits state regulators to waive it on a case-by-case basis.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the "GLB Act") dramatically increases the ability of eligible banking organizations to affiliate with insurance, securities and other financial firms and insured depository institutions. The GLB Act permits eligible
banking organizations to engage in activities and to affiliate with nonbank firms engaged in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to such financial activities and also includes some additional activities that are complementary to such
financial activities.

The definition of activities that are financial in nature is handled by the GLB Act in two ways. First, there is a laundry list of activities that are designated as financial in nature. Second, the authorization of new activities as financial in nature
or incidental to a financial activity requires a consultative process between the Federal Reserve Board and the Secretary of the Treasury with each having the authority to veto proposals of the other. The Federal Reserve Board has the discretion to
determine what activities are complementary to financial activities.





Part I (Continued)

Item 1 (Continued)

The precise scope of the authority to engage in these new financial activities, however, depends on the type of banking organization, whether it is a holding company, a subsidiary of a national bank, or a national bank's direct conduct. The GLB Act
repealed two sections of the Glass-Stegall Act, Sections 20 and 32, which restricted affiliations between securities firms and banks. The GLB Act authorizes two types of banking organizations to engage in expanded securities activities. The GLB Act
authorizes a new type of bank holding company called a financial holding company to have a subsidiary company that engages in securities underwriting and dealing without limitation as to the types of securities involved. The GLB Act also permits a
national bank to control a financial subsidiary that can engage in many of the expanded securities activities permitted for financial holding companies. However, additional restrictions apply to national bank financial subsidiaries.

Since the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, and subsequent amendments, federal law has limited the types of activities that are permitted for a bank holding company, and it has also limited the types of companies that a bank holding company can
control. The GLB Act retains the bank holding company regulatory framework, but adds a new provision that authorizes enlarged authority for the new financial holding company form of organization to engage in any activity of a financial nature or
incidental thereto. A new Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act provides that a financial holding company may engage in any activity, and may acquire and retain shares of any company engaged in any activity, that the Federal Reserve Board, in
coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury, determines by regulation or order to be financial in nature or incidental to such financial activities, or is complementary to financial activities.

The GLB Act also amends the Bank Holding Company Act to prescribe eligibility criteria for financial holding companies, defines the scope of activities permitted for bank holding companies that do not become financial holding companies, and establishes
consequences for financial holding companies that cease to maintain the status needed to qualify as a financial holding company.

There are three special criteria to qualify for the enlarged activities and affiliation. First, all the depository institutions in the bank holding company organization must be well-capitalized. Second, all of the depository institutions of the bank
holding company must be well managed. Third, the bank holding company must have filed a declaration of intent with the Federal Reserve Board stating that it intends to exercise the expanded authority under the GLB Act and certify to the Federal Reserve
Board that the bank holding company's depository institutions meet the well-capitalized and well managed criteria. The GLB Act also requires the bank to achieve a rating of satisfactory or better in meeting community credit needs at the most recent
examination of such institution under the Community Reinvestment Act.

Once a bank holding company has filed a declaration of its intent to be a financial holding company, as long as there is no action by the Federal Reserve Board giving notice that it is not eligible, the company may proceed to engage in the activities
and enter into the affiliations under the large authority conferred by the GLB Act's amendments to the Bank Holding Company Act. The holding company does not need prior approval from the Federal Reserve Board to engage in activities that the GLB Act
identifies as financial in nature or that the Federal Reserve Board has determined to be financial in nature or incidental thereto by order or regulation.

Part I (Continued)

Item 1 (Continued)

The GLB Act retains the basic structure of the Bank Holding Company Act. Thus, a bank holding company that is not eligible for the expanded powers of a financial holding company is now subject to the amended Section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company
Act which freezes the activities that are authorized and defined as closely related to banking activities. Under this Section a bank holding company is not eligible for the expanded activities permitted under new Section 4(k) and is limited to those
specific activities previously approved by the Federal Reserve Board.

The GLB Act also addresses the consequences when a financial holding company that has exercised the expanded authority fails to maintain its eligibility to be a financial holding company. The Federal Reserve Board may impose such limitations on the
conduct or activities of a noncompliant financial holding company or any affiliate of that company as the Board determines to be appropriate under the circumstances and consistent with the purpose of the Act.

The GLB Act is essentially a dramatic liberalization of the restrictions placed on banks, especially bank holding companies, regarding the areas of financial businesses in which they are allowed to compete.



Regulation of the Banks

As state-chartered banks, the Banks are examined and regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") and the Georgia Department.

The major functions of the FDIC with respect to insured banks include paying depositors to the extent provided by law in the event an insured bank is closed without adequately providing for payment of the claim of depositors, acting as a receiver of
state banks placed in receivership when so appointed by state authorities, and preventing the continuance or development of unsound and unsafe banking practices. In addition, the FDIC also approves conversions, mergers, consolidations, and assumption of
deposit liability transactions between insured banks and noninsured banks or institutions to prevent capital or surplus diminution in such transactions where the resulting, continued or assumed bank is an insured nonmember state bank.

Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company are subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Bank Holding Company Act on any extension of credit to the bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries, on investment in the stock or other
securities thereof and on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower. In addition, a bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in arrangements in connection with any extension
of credit or provision of any property or services.

The Georgia Department regulates all areas of the banks' banking operations, including mergers, establishment of branches, loans, interest rates and reserves. The Bank must have the approval of the Commissioner to pay cash dividends, unless at the time
of such payment:

(i)	the total classified assets at the most recent examination of such banks do not exceed 80 percent of Tier 1 capital plus Allowance for Loan Losses as reflected at such examination;



Part I (Continued)

Item 1 (Continued)



(ii)	the aggregate amount of dividends declared or anticipated to be declared in the calendar year does not exceed 50 percent of the net profits, after taxes but before dividends, for the previous calendar year; and

(iii)	the ratio of Tier 1 Capital to Adjusted Total Assets shall not be less than six (6) percent.

The Banks are also subject to State of Georgia banking and usury laws restricting the amount of interest which it may charge in making loans or other extensions of credit.

Expansion through Branching, Merger or Consolidation

With respect to expansion, the Banks were previously prohibited from establishing branch offices or facilities outside of the county in which their main office was located, except:

1. in adjacent counties in certain situations, or
2. by means of merger or consolidation with a bank which has been in existence for at least five years.

In addition, in the case of a merger or consolidation, the acquiring bank must have been in existence for at least 24 months prior to the merger. However, effective July 1, 1996, Georgia permits the subsidiary bank(s) of any bank holding company then
engaged in the banking business in the State of Georgia to establish, de novo, upon receipt of required regulatory approval, an aggregate of up to three additional branch banks in any county within the State of Georgia. Effective July 1, 1998, this same
Georgia law permits, with required regulatory approval, the establishment of de novo branches in an unlimited number of counties within the State of Georgia by the subsidiary bank(s) of bank holding companies then engaged in the banking business in the
State of Georgia. This law may result in increased competition in the Banks' market area.

Capital Requirements

The FDIC adopted risk-based capital guidelines that went into effect on December 31, 1990 for all FDIC insured state chartered banks that are not members of the Federal Reserve System. Beginning December 31, 1992, all banks were required to
maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk weighted assets of eight (8) percent of which at least four (4) percent must consist of Tier 1 capital. Tier 1 capital of state chartered banks (as defined by the regulation) generally consists of: (i)
common stockholders' equity; (ii) qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus; and (iii) minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. In addition, the FDIC adopted a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to
total assets of banks, referred to as the leverage capital ratio of three (3) percent if the FDIC determines that the institution is not anticipating or experiencing significant growth and has well-diversified risk, including no undue interest rate
exposure, excellent asset quality, high liquidity, good earnings and, in general, is considered a strong banking organization, rated Composite "1" under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (the CAMEL rating system) established by the Federal
Financial Institutions Examination Council. All other financial institutions are required to maintain a leverage ratio of four (4) percent.

Part I (Continued)

Item 1 (Continued)

Effective October 1, 1998, the FDIC amended its risk-based and leverage capital rules as follows: (1) all servicing assets and purchase credit card relationships ("PCCRs") that are included in capital are each subject to a ninety (90) percent of fair
value limitation (also known as a "ten (10) percent haircut"); (2) the aggregate amount of all servicing assets and PCCRs included in capital cannot excess 100 percent of Tier I capital; (3) the aggregate amount of nonmortgage servicing assets ("NMSAs")
and PCCRS included in capital cannot exceed 25 percent of Tier 1 capital; and (4) all other intangible assets (other than qualifying PCCRS) must be deducted from Tier 1 capital.

Amounts of servicing assets and PCCRs in excess of the amounts allowable must be deducted in determining Tier 1 capital. Interest-only Strips receivable, whether or not in security form, are not subject to any regulatory capital limitation under the
amended rule.

FDIC Insurance Assessments

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA"), enacted in December, 1991, provided for a number of reforms relating to the safety and soundness of the deposit insurance system, supervision of domestic and foreign
depository institutions and improvement of accounting standards. One aspect of the Act is the requirement that banks will have to meet certain safety and soundness standards. In order to comply with the Act, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC implemented
regulations defining operational and managerial standards relating to internal controls, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, director and officer compensation, fees and benefits, asset quality, earnings and stock
valuation.

The regulations provide for a risk-based premium system which requires higher assessment rates for banks which the FDIC determines pose greater risks to the Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF"). Under the regulations, banks pay an assessment depending upon risk
classification.

To arrive at risk-based assessments, the FDIC places each bank in one of nine risk categories using a two-step process based on capital ratios and on other relevant information. Each bank is assigned to one of three groups: (i) well capitalized, (ii)
adequately capitalized, or (iii) under capitalized, based on its capital ratios. The FDIC also assigned each bank to one of three subgroups based upon an evaluation of the risk posed by the bank. The three subgroups include (i) banks that are financially
sound with only a few minor weaknesses, (ii) banks with weaknesses which, if not corrected, could result in significant deterioration of the bank and increased risk to the BIF, and (iii) those banks that pose a substantial probability of loss to the BIF
unless corrective action is taken. FDICIA imposes progressively more restrictive constraints on operations management and capital distributions depending on the category in which an institution is classified. As of December 31, 1998, the Bank met the
definition of a "well capitalized" institution and will be assessed accordingly for 1998.

Under FDICIA, insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law,
regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC.



Part I (Continued)

Item 1 (Continued)

Community Reinvestment Act

The Company and the Banks are subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, as amended (the "CRA") and the federal banking agencies regulations issued thereunder. Under the CRA, all banks and thrifts have a continuing and
affirmative obligation, consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs for their entire communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for
financial institutions, nor does it limit an institution s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA.

The CRA requires a depository institution s primary federal regulator, in connection with its examination of the institution, to assess the institution s record of assessing and meeting the credit needs of the community served by that institution,
including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The regulatory agency s assessment of the institution s record is made available to the public. In the case of a bank holding company applying for approval to acquire a bank or other bank holding company,
the Federal Reserve will assess the records of each subsidiary depository institution of the applicant bank holding company, and such records may be the basis for denying the application.

The evaluation system used to judge an institution s CRA performance consists of three tests: (1) a lending test; (2) an investment test; and (3) a service test. Each of these tests will be applied by the institution s primary federal regulator taking
into account such factors as: (i) demographic data about the community; (ii) the institution s capacity and constraints; (iii) the institution s product offerings and business strategy; and (iv) data on the prior performance of the institution and
similarly-situated lenders.

In addition, a financial institution will have the option of having its CRA performance evaluated based on a strategic plan of up to five years in length that it had developed in cooperation with local community groups. In order to be rated under a
strategic plan, the institution will be required to obtain the prior approval of its federal regulator.

The interagency CRA regulations provide that an institution evaluated under a given test will receive one of five ratings for the test: (1) outstanding; (2) high satisfactory; (3) low satisfactory; (4) needs to improve; and (5) substantial
noncompliance. An institution will receive a certain number of points for its rating on each test, and the points are combined to produce an overall composite rating. Evidence of discriminatory or other illegal credit practices would adversely affect an
institution s overall rating. Each of SNB's subsidiary banks received a "high satisfactory" CRA rating as a result of their last CRA examination.

Proposed Legislation

Legislation is regularly considered and adopted by both the United States Congress and the Georgia General Assembly. Such legislation could result in regulatory changes and changes in competitive relationships for banks and bank holding companies.
The effect of such legislation on the business of the Company and the Banks cannot be predicted.

Part I (Continued)

Item 1 (Continued)

Monetary Policy

The results of operations of the Company and the Banks are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Federal Reserve. The instruments of monetary policy employed by the Federal Reserve include open market operations in
U.S. Government securities, changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowings, changes in reserve requirements against member bank deposits and limitations on interest rates which member banks may pay on time and savings deposits. In view of the
changing conditions in the foreign and national economy, as well as the effect of policies and actions taken by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the Federal Reserve, no prediction can be made as to possible future changes in interest rates,
deposit levels, loan demand or the business and earnings of the Company.

Year 2000 Project

The Banks rely heavily upon computers for the daily conduct of their business and will commit all resources necessary to achieve a satisfactory and timely solution to computer based problems related to the Year 2000 and beyond.

The Year 2000 Issue is the result of computer programs being written using two digits rather than four to define the applicable year. Any of the Company s programs that have time-sensitive software may recognize a date using "00" as the year 1900
rather than the year 2000.

In accordance with sound management policy and directives from regulatory agencies, the bank began the Year 2000 review of hardware and software in 1997. The review included not only computer and information systems but heating and cooling systems,
alarms, vaults, elevators and other office equipment, and was completed in 1998. Items that were found not Year 2000 compliant were slated for upgrade or replacement.

The Company reports no problems in data processing or retrieval and has experienced no delays in operations due to the Year 2000 rollover.



Item 2

PROPERTIES

SNB's subsidiaries, SB-Bibb and SB-Houston, owned nine full-service banking locations as of December 31, 1999. Leased properties include one full-service branch, one mortgage lending facility and SB-Bibb's operations center, which houses its in-house
data processing facility and operational support functions. The net book value of all facilities including furniture, fixtures and equipment totaled $8,284,000 as of December 31, 1999. Management considers that its properties are well maintained.

Part I (Continued)

Item 3

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company and its subsidiaries may become parties to various legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business. As of December 31, 1999, there are no material pending legal proceedings to which SNB or its subsidiaries are a party or of
which any of its property is the subject.

Item 4

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.



Part II

Item 5

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

SNB common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol "SNBJ." Prior to December 1, 1997, SNB common stock was not traded on any public market or exchange, although certain brokerage firms made a market for its common stock. The
following table sets forth the high, low and close sale prices per share of the common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market, and the dividends declared per share for the periods indicated.

|Year Ended December 31, 1999 | High   | Low    | Close  | Dividend Per Share
|---------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------------------
|                             |        |        |        |                   
|Fourth Quarter               | $18.50 | $14.00 | $14.13 | $0.065            
|Third Quarter                | 20.00  | 16.00  | 16.00  | 0.065             
|Second Quarter               | 20.25  | 15.31  | 20.00  | 0.065             
|First Quarter                | 20.50  | 14.75  | 18.50  | 0.060             

|Year Ended December 31, 1998 | High   | Low    | Close  | Dividend Per Share
|---------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------------------
|                             |        |        |        |                   
|Fourth Quarter               | $21.00 | $17.00 | $20.00 | $0.060            
|Third Quarter                | 25.00  | 19.00  | 19.50  | 0.060             
|Second Quarter               | 25.00  | 22.20  | 23.94  | 0.063             
|First Quarter                | 23.00  | 18.00  | 22.00  | 0.037             

As of March 15, 2000 the Company had approximately 689 shareholders of record.