alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 44 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.44
                                    Agreed to September 19, 2014        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Thursday, 
September 18, 2014, through Tuesday, October 14, 2014, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on 
Wednesday, October 15, 2014, or such other time on that day as may be 
specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
recess or adjourn; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on 
Wednesday, October 15, 2014, it stand adjourned until 12:00 noon on 
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, or such other time on that day as may be 
specified by its Majority Leader or his designee, or until the time of 
any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on any 
legislative day from Thursday, September 18, 2014, through Friday, 
November 7, 2014, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned 
until 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 12, 2014, or until the time of 
any reassembly pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  (a) The Majority Leader of the Senate or his designee, 
after concurrence with the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify 
the Members of the Senate to reassemble at such place and time as he 
may designate if, in his opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
     (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the Senate 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the Senate shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.
    Sec. 3.  (a) The Speaker or his designee, after consultation with 
the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the House 
to reassemble at such place and time as he may designate if, in his 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
     (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the House 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the House shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9265-9266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3684]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--PXI Systems Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 26, 2012, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Logic 
Instruments S.A., Domont, France, has been added as a party to this 
venture. Also, Averna, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and Hunan RunCore 
High-Tech Co. Ltd., Chang Sha, Hunan, People's Republic of China, have 
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. intends 
to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.

[[Page 9266]]

    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 22, 
2011. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on December 23, 2011 (76 FR 80405).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-3684 Filed 2-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT R OLANDO RIVER

A-IB ANEZ, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 08-72811 Age n c y No. A098-435-487

M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d De c e m

be r 9, 2015 ** B e fore : W ALLAC E, R AW LINSON, a

n d IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s. R ola ndo Rive ra -Ibane z , a

native and c itiz e n of El Sa lva dor, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a pplic ation for a sy lum , withholding of rem o v a l, a nd prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture



# FIL ED DEC 15 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).(“ C AT” ). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, se e W ak k ary v . Holde r , 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th C ir. 2009), a

nd we de ny

the pe t ition for re vie w. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the B IA’ s de te rm ination tha

t R ive ra -Ibane z fa ile d to e sta

blish a prote c te d ground wa s “ one c e ntra l re a son” for ha rm he suffe re d or fe ars. Se e Parussimov a v . Muk ase y , 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th C i r. 2009) (“ The REAL ID Ac t re quire s tha t a prote c te d ground repre se nt ‘ one c e n tra l re a son’ for an a sy lum a p plic ant’ s pe rse c ution[.] ” ); s e e also Gormle y v . Ashc roft , 364 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th C ir. 2004) (“ R andom , isola te d c rim ina l a c ts pe rpe t

ra te d by anony m ous thie v e s do not e s ta

blish pe rse c ution.” ). Thus, Rive ra -Ibane z ’ s a sy lum and withholding of re

m o va l c la im s fa il. Se e Ze tino v . Holde r , 622 F.3d 1007, 1015–16 (9th C ir. 2010). Substa ntia l e v i de nc e a lso supports the B IA’ s de nia l of C AT prote c tion be c a use R ive ra -Iban e z fa ile d

to e sta blish it is m

ore like ly tha n not tha t a gove rnm e nt offic ia l would c onse nt to or a c quie s c e in his torture by ga n g m e m be rs if he re turns to El Salva dor. S e e 8 C .F.R . § 1208.18(a)(1); se e also Silay a v . Muk ase y , 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th C ir. 2008). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

0 8 - 7 2 8 1 1 2
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1994/2005

of 7 December 2005         

fixing the basic products which do not qualify for advance payment of export refunds

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 18, first paragraph thereof, and to the corresponding provisions of the other Regulations on the common organisation of the market in agricultural products,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 565/80 of 4 March 1980 on the advance payment of export refunds in respect of agricultural products (2),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The basic products which shall not qualify under the arrangements referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EEC) No 565/80 are listed in Annex I of this Regulation.

However, such basic products shall be excluded only where they are intended for use in the processing of the products mentioned:

Article 2

Regulation (EEC) No 1618/81 is repealed.

References to the repealed Regulation shall be construed as references to this Regulation and shall be read in accordance with the correlation table in Annex III.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2005.

For the Commission

José Manuel BARROSO            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 62, 7.3.1980, p. 5. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 444/2003 (OJ L 67, 12.3.2003, p. 3).

(3)OJ L 160, 18.6.1981, p. 17. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3480/88 (OJ L 305, 10.11.1988, p. 28).

(4)  See Annex II.

(5)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96.

----

ANNEX I

----

ANNEX II

Repealed Regulation with its successive amendments

----

ANNEX III

CORRELATION TABLE

----
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-11-00325-CR

RICHARD WORLEY, JR.,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-172-C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Richard Worley, Jr. was found guilty of the felony offense of aggravated robbery 

with a deadly weapon and was sentenced to sixty years in prison after Worley pleaded 

true to an enhancement paragraph. Worley appealed.

Worley’s appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an 

Anders brief, asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in 

his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 

18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although informed of his right to do so, Worley did not file a pro 
Worley v. State Page 2

se response to the Anders brief.1

In an Anders case, we must, “after a full examination of all the proceedings, ... 

decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.” Id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; accord Stafford v. 

State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is “wholly frivolous” or 

“without merit” when it “lacks any basis in law or fact.” McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 

U.S. 429, 439 n.10, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988). We have conducted 

an independent review of the record, and because we find this appeal to be wholly 

frivolous, we affirm the judgment.

We grant appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of 

Worley. Notwithstanding this grant, appointed counsel must send Worley a copy of 

our decision, notify him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and 

send this Court a letter certifying counsel’s compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 48.4. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4; see also Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670, 673-74 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2006).

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed April 25, 2012

Do not publish

[CRPM]

 

1 An apparent relative of Worley’s has filed an opposition to appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw and 

a response to the Anders brief. This person is not a licensed Texas attorney, nor does the response comply 

with Rule 11’s requirements for an amicus curiae brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 11. Accordingly, these 

documents will not be considered by the Court.
Exhibit 99.1

[Freedonia Letterhead]

CONSENT OF THE FREEDONIA GROUP, INC.

We hereby consent to the references to our companys name in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly
Period Ended September 30, 2012 (the Quarterly Report) of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (the Company) and the quotation by the Company in the Quarterly Report from Table IV-4 from our report World Well Stimulation
Materials, April 2011. We also hereby consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Quarterly Report.



THE FREEDONIA GROUP, INC.By:

/S/ CORINNE GANGLOFFName:

Corinne GangloffTitle:

Media Relations Director


October 29, 2012
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.19 MB)

Tags:dla, Construction and Equipment, MRO, usace

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 10367



		

			Exhibit 10.367

		


		

			 

		




		
			SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
		

		
			 
		

		
			The Board of Directors approved revisions to the supplemental cash retainers paid to committee members and committee chairs on December 9, 2015.  Effective January 1, 2016, non-employee director compensation was as follows:
		

		
			Cash Retainers
		

		
			Each non-employee director receives an annual cash retainer in the amount of $100,000.
		

		
			The Chair of the Audit Committee and the Risk Committee receive a supplemental annual cash retainer of $35,000 and each other member of the Audit Committee and Risk Committee receives  a supplemental annual cash retainer of $15,000.  The Chair of the Compensation Committee receives a supplemental cash retainer of $30,000, and the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee receives  a supplemental annual cash retainer of $25,000.  Each other member of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives a supplemental annual cash retainer of $10,000.  There are no fees paid for attendance at board or committee meetings.
		

		
			The board retains the discretion to establish special committees in the future and to pay a special retainer to the Chair and the members of any such special committee.
		

		
			Equity Grants
		

		
			Each non-employee director receives an annual equity grant under the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan with an aggregate value of $140,000.  The equity grants  are 50 percent in stock options and 50 percent in restricted shares.  Equity grants vest 25% on each of the first and second anniversaries of the date of grant and the remaining 50% on the third anniversary of the date of grant.
		

		
			In the event a new non-employee director is elected to the board during the year, a pro-rata retainer amount with the same ratio between cash retainers and equity grants is granted to that individual.
EXHIBIT 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Henry P.
Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Henry P. Hoffman
------------------------
Henry P. Hoffman
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2006


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
exv10w16






Exhibit 10.16




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE NORTEK, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN B




     WHEREAS, Nortek, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the Nortek, Inc. Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan B (the “Plan”) effective January 1, 1998; and



     WHEREAS, the Plan provides that the Board may, from time to time, amend said Plan provided
that such amendment does not reduce the accrued benefit of any participant.



     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the date of this Amendment, the Plan is hereby amended and
revised to read as follows:




	 	1.	 	Section 2.20 is amended to read as follows:






         “2.20. “Years of Service” means Years of Service for purposes of benefit accrual as
defined in the Nortek, Inc. Retirement Plan (as in effect on December 31, 1995), but
computed without regard to the fact that benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan ceased
after December 31, 1995, unless otherwise provided in Schedule A attached hereto.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed this 4th day of
May, 2000.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	NORTEK, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Richard J. Harris
 	 
	 	 	Vice President and Treasurer 	 
	 	 	 	 



 









 






	 	 	 	 	 



SCHEDULE A




Participants



	 	 	 
	Name	 	Date of Participation
	Bruce Fleming

	 	January 1, 1998 and his “Years of Service” as defined in
Section 2.20 shall include the period of his prior
employment from October 21, 1985 to November 30, 1989.
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 227 

To commemorate the 70th anniversary of the heroic rescue of Danish Jews 

during the Second World War by the Danish people. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 

Mr. MENENDEZ submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

To commemorate the 70th anniversary of the heroic rescue 

of Danish Jews during the Second World War by the 

Danish people. 

Whereas, in the fall of 1943, the Nazis occupied Denmark 

and issued orders that the Danes deport all Danish Jews 

to concentration camps where the Jews would eventually 

be exterminated; 

Whereas the Danish people, as a result of the Nazi mandate, 

refused to accept the prosecution of the Jews and began 

a mission of mercy on October 1, 1943, smuggling Jews 

across the Oresund Strait to neutral Sweden via small 

boats and fishing cutters; 

Whereas the Danish rescuers unselfishly risked their own 

lives, avoiding German patrols for weeks during the rescue operations; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 227 IS 

Whereas approximately 90 percent of the Danish Jews were 

saved from certain death at the hands of the Nazis by 

the sheer courage and compassion demonstrated by the 

Danes; and 

Whereas it is imperative that future generations continue to 

remember and understand what happened so that the 

horrors of the Holocaust will never be repeated: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes and commemorates the bravery 

3 and valor of those Danes who participated in the 

4 1943 rescue operations that saved the lives of 7,300 

5 Jews who would otherwise have perished in Nazi 

6 concentration camps; and 

7 (2) declares that the world owes a great debt to 

8 these Danes who did not turn a blind eye on the 

9 dangers that faced Jews under Nazi occupation and 

10 continue to serve as inspiration to others in times of 

11 difficulties and challenges. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00149-CR

Billy Joshua Brewer, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NO. 17-1557-K368, THE HONORABLE RICK J. KENNON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant Billy Joshua Brewer seeks to appeal a judgment of conviction for 

aggravated assault on a family member with a deadly weapon. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.02(b)(1).

The trial court has certified that (1) this is a plea-bargain case and Brewer has no right of appeal, 

and (2) Brewer has waived the right of appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Triana

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: September 4, 2020

Do Not Publish