alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.16 MB)

Tags:DLA Installation SUpport at Richmond, People & CUlture, fallen law enforcement officers, Virginia State Trooper, National Police Week , police

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 3632 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NM

- 023

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$8 5 / h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Initial In spection 9.5 $ 807.50 $ 

### 0 $ 807.50 

### 922 $ 744,515.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance: 

### 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 744,515



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### Replacement 2.0 $ 170.00 $10,000 $ 10,170.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0 .00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Wi ll the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include spec ific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.73 MB)

Tags:HURRICANE IRMA, Maxwell Air Force Base, FEMA

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.27 MB)

Tags:DLA Disposition Services, Defense Logisitcs Agency, USAG Kwajalein Atoll

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Thomas Coyle, alias Edmund Spanburgh, Defendant.

Court of General Sessions, New York County,

October 18, 1956.

*Thomas Coyle,*defendant in person.

*Franh S. Hogan, District Attorney (Bernard L. Friedman*of counsel), for plaintiff.

Thomas Dickens J.

The defendant moves by means of this *coram nobis*proceeding to set aside his plea of guilty and asks leave to enter in place thereof a plea of not guilty.

The indictment, charging the defendant with the crime of attempted robbery in the first degree, is dated September 9,1936.

The crux of the application is that he was not informed of his right to be represented by counsel at the time he pleaded guilty.

Assuming the factual merit of his assertion concerning the court’s failure to inform him of the right to counsel at the time *425of pleading, this court must nevertheless deny the application herein.

The reason is that the defendant admits in his affidavit that he was represented by counsel at the time of sentence.

This admission brings the defendant’s application within the purview of the adverse reasoning of the language of the court in *Canizio*v. *New York*(327 U. S. 82, 85-86, cited in *People*v. *Matera,*132 N. Y. S. 2d 117, 119), where the court observed, with respect to a similar situation, as follows: ‘ ‘ The attorney could have moved to withdraw the plea of guilty and the County Court of Kings County would have had the power to set aside the plea and let the petitioner stand trial, New York Code of Criminal Procedure, § 337 * * * At any rate, whatever the reason, petitioner’s counsel did not move to withdraw the guilty plea. All of this demonstrated to the satisfaction of the court below that even though petitioner may not have had counsel at the beginning, he had counsel in ample time to take advantage of every defense which could have been available to him originally. We think the record shows that petitioner actually had the benefit of counsel. When that counsel took over petitioner’s defense, he could have raised the question of a defect in the earlier part of the proceedings. Failing to do so when the statute afforded him the opportunity, we cannot say that the court denied petitioner the right to have a trial with the benefit of counsel. ’ ’

The application is therefore denied.

The District Attorney is directed to enter an order in conformance with the decision herein and to forward a certified copy to defendant.
#### Domenico Avelino et al., Appellants, *v.*Nick Fasano, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 20, 1958.

*Thomas Cartelli*for appellants.

*Frank J. Gafaro*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The acceptance of the old rent for May, 1957 was with the implied understanding that commencing with June 1, 1957 it would be $150 per month, pursuant to the 30 days’ notice eoneededly served upon the tenant on April 12, 1957. Notwithstanding the 30 days’ notice, tenant chose to remain in possession after June 1, 1957, and by doing so, became liable for the full month’s rent for June in the sum of $150, since the dwelling was decontrolled. The court was without power to apportion the rent for the 10 days tenant remained in possession commencing June 1, 1957.

Accordingly, judgment should be modified by increasing the recovery herein to $170.76, with costs, and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs to appellants.

*636Hofstadter, J.

(dissenting). From the disposition made by the Trial Justice, it must be assumed that he gave effect to the testimony of Mrs. Fasano that when the plaintiff was informed of the efforts to find a new apartment he told her not to worry. The statement may well be regarded as his assurance that he would not hold the defendant to a strict time schedule and make reasonable allowance for delay in vacating. This conversation took place in May, before the increase from $65 to $150 was to go into effect. The plaintiff’s assurance given in these circumstances fits in with the established rule that, in the absence of express agreement, rent is not payable in advance but only after it has been earned. *(Smathers*v. *Standard Oil Co.,*199 App. Div. 368, affd. 233 N. Y. 617; *De Simone*v. *Canzonieri,*246 App. Div. 735; *Arcade Realty Co.*v. *Tunney,*52 Misc. 148; *Bernard*v. *Triangle Music Co.,*1 Wn. [2d] 41; Ann. 126 A. L. R. 558; see full annotations in the A. L. R. report). While under the cases, remaining over after notice of an increase of rent, may in some circumstances be deemed an assent to the increase, it is abundantly clear here that neither party believed there was a renewal of the lease at the increased rental nor any new agreement at all. There was merely acquiescence by the plaintiffs in the continued possession until the defendant was able to move into a new apartment. In this context any implied assent to pay the increase can reasonably be limited to the period of actual occupancy after June 1, especially since this limitation is perfectly consistent with the rule cited. There was no agreement to pay a full month’s rent in advance. The disposition below, which gives the plaintiffs rent at the rate of $150 for the period during which the defendant continued in possession of the apartment since rented at only $75 a month, was a fair and equitable disposition of the controversy. Hence, I dissent.

Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur in *Per Curiam*opinion; Hofstadter, J., dissents in opinion.

Judgment modified, etc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SYNETIC,
INC.'S 6/30/98 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          90,645
<SECURITIES>                                     9,995
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,857
<ALLOWANCES>                                       786
<INVENTORY>                                      5,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,096
<PP&E>                                          51,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 396,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,027
<BONDS>                                        159,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           230
<OTHER-SE>                                     205,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   396,926
<SALES>                                         64,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,945
<CGS>                                           34,508
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,832
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,788
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,044
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,044
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.5 MB)

Tags:Defense Logisitics Agency, DLA Troop Support, RESTRICTED INGREDIENTS, R&DA, SUBSISTENCE, MILITARY MENUS

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF DELOITTE AND TOUCHE LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
33-60666, 33-82280, 33-89388, 33-65186, 33-92372, 33-96030, 33-33726, 333-04439,
333-16067, 333-16211, 333-21573, 333-23819, 333-59799, 333-48189, 333-71869 and
333-88041 of S3 Incorporated on Form S-8 and No. 333-17519 on Form S-3 of our
report dated January 23, 1998, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of S3
Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 1999.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
March 29, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from NDE
Environmental  Inc.'s financial statements as of and for the year ended December
31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                             193,627
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                   10,923,157
<ALLOWANCES>                     1,066,331
<INVENTORY>                        482,107
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                11,682,510
<PP&E>                          15,865,086
<DEPRECIATION>                  11,052,586
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  21,748,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           10,938,898
<BONDS>                         10,589,252
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            1,500,000
<PREFERRED>                          5,000
<COMMON>                             1,598
<OTHER-SE>                      (1,810,930)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    21,748,818
<SALES>                         38,683,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                38,683,146
<CGS>                           29,246,121
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   37,099,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    11,420
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               3,205,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (1,314,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                        39,060
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (1,353,635)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                    (1,353,635)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.09)



</TABLE>