alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Earth Science Tech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wendell
Hecker and Robert Stevens as Receiver for Earth Science Tech, Inc. in Case No. A-18-784952-C, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



|                             | RECEIVER
        FOR EARTH SCIENCE TECH, INC.
        CASE
        NO. A-18-784952-C
        STRONGBOW
        ADVISORS, INC.
|---------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                             |                                                                                                                              
|Dated:
    November 14, 2019 | By:                                                                                                                          
|                             |                                                                                                                              
|                             | Its:                                                                                                                         



|                             | EARTH
    SCIENCE TECH, INC.
|---------------------------- | ----------------------------
|                             |                             
|Dated:
    November 14, 2019 | By:                         
|                             |                             
|                             | Its:                        





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of New Source Energy Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                      
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2012 |  | /s/ Kristian B. Kos                                  
|                      |  | Kristian B. Kos President
and Chief Executive Officer
Social cost estimate for Ch. 9 of the proposed toxics rule RIA, and a related appendix Larry Sorrels to: cortney_higgins 03/03/2011 06:19 PM Cc: Ron Evans, RobertJ Wayland, Lydia Wegman, Peter Tsirigotis, Bill Maxwell, Sam Napolitano, Al McGartland, DavidA Evans, Peter Nagelhout, Alex Barron

Cortney,

Attached is the portion of Chapter 9 of the toxics rule RIA that includes an estimate of the social cost of the proposal. Also attached is an appendix describing the multimarket model and data that the model uses. Thank you.

ToxicsRuleRIAChapter9socialcosts3-03.docx ToxicsRuleRIAAppendixE3-03.docx

Larry Sorrels US EPA/OAQPS/HEID/AEG RTP, NC 27711 919-541-5041 919-541-0839 (fax) C439-02 Room No. C445-A
<PAGE>

                                FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                           THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED
                        THERMADYNE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
                       1994 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

1.       PURPOSE.

         This First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Thermadyne Holdings
Corporation 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (this "Amendment") amends that
certain Third Amended and Restated Thermadyne Holdings Corporation 1994
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan"). In connection with that certain
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated January 20, 1998, among Thermadyne Holdings
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), and Mercury
Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation, the Board of Directors has
determined that it is advisable and in the best interest of the Corporation to
amend the Plan as set forth in this Amendment.

2.       AMENDMENT OF SECTION 4(A).

         Section 4(A) of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:

A. An Eligible Employee of the Corporation or a Subsidiary may participate in
the Plan by completing an enrollment agreement ("Enrollment Agreement") and any
other necessary documents supplied by the Corporation authorizing payroll
deductions to cover the aggregate purchase price of those shares of Common
Stock which he intends to purchase pursuant to the terms of the Plan and filing
such Enrollment Agreement with the designated officer of the Corporation prior
to the start of the Payroll Deduction Period. Such election and authorization
shall continue in effect for the entire Payroll Deduction Period; provided,
however, that an Eligible Employee shall have the option to decrease (but not
increase) his payroll deduction once during the Payroll Deduction Period by
filing a new Enrollment Agreement (the "Amended Enrollment Agreement"). The
Amended Enrollment Agreement shall become effective on the beginning of the
first calendar quarter following the date of filing the Amended Enrollment
Agreement with the designated officer of the Corporation.

3.       REFERENCE TO AND EFFECT ON THE PLAN.

                  (a) On and after the date hereof, each reference in the Plan
         to "the Plan", "hereunder", "hereof", "herein" or words of like import
         referring to the Plan shall mean and be a reference to the Plan as
         hereby amended.

                  (b) Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the
         Plan shall remain in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and
         confirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



GLOBAL EQUITY INTERNATIONAL, INC.

A Nevada corporation

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Global Equity International, Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Enzo Taddei, Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentication, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed from within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: August 10, 2012 | /s/
    Enzo Taddei                         
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                      | Enzo Taddei                                 
|                      | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                      | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.54 MB)

Tags:VIPR , Hurricane Maria

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
*Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 94-60743 Summary Calendar

_____________________ ROBERTO LUGO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF DONNA, HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS, ET AL., Defendants, ARACELIA REYES, Individuially, Etc., ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

_______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Texas

(M-93-CV-260)

_______________________________________________________ (September 28, 1995) Before REAVLEY, SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Plaintiff Roberto Lugo brought various state claims and three claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the commissioners of the Donna Housing Authority. The commissioners moved under Fed.2

R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the § 1983 claims on qualified immunity grounds, arguing that Lugo's complaint did not meet the heightened pleading standards applicable to § 1983 actions under Elliott v. Perez , 751 F.2d 1472 (5th Cir. 1985). The commissioners now appeal the denial of their 12(b)(6) motion. Between the time the district court denied the motion to dismiss and the consideration of this appeal, the Fifth Circuit changed the pleading procedure for cases in which qualified immunity is asserted as a defense. Schultea v. Wood, 47 F.3d 1427 (5th Cir. 1995) (en banc). Under Schultea , plaintiffs need no longer anticipate a qualified immunity defense in the complaint. Id . at 1430. If the complaint states a claim under normal pleading standards, the defendant must raise his qualified immunity defense in an answer, and if he does so, the district court may, in its discretion, insist that plaintiff file a reply tailored specifically to the issue of qualified immunity. Id . at 1433-34. After receiving the reply, the court can determine whether the case can proceed and consider any motions for summary judgment. Id . In light of Schultea , and because denial of a motion to dismiss is not appealable, this appeal is dismissed. DISMISSED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.64 MB)

Tags:ohio, lima, DLA Land and Maritime, People and Culture L&M, JSMC, Joint Systems Manufacturing Center

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 185 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 185

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 
           R. Wayne Patterson v. United States Senate, et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2013

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 
           R. Wayne Patterson v. United States Senate, et al.

Whereas, the United States Senate, Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., and 
        Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth C. MacDonough have been named as 
        defendants in the case of R. Wayne Patterson v. United States Senate, et 
        al., No. 13-cv-2311, now pending in the United States District Court for 
        the Northern District of California;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to defend the Senate and officers and employees of 
        the Senate in civil actions relating to their official responsibilities: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
the United States Senate, Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., and 
Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth C. MacDonough in the case of R. Wayne 
Patterson v. United States Senate, et al.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TELLY ALEXANDER HEATH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

GREG JONES; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

JOAN BARTON,

Defendant.

No. 15-35211

D.C. No. 2:13-cv-01875-MA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Malcolm F. Marsh, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 14, 2016**

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Telly Alexander Heath, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se from the 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 23 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 15-35211 

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Eighth 

Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We 

review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we 

affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Heath failed 

to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were 

deliberately indifferent to his serious mental health needs by housing him in the 

Disciplinary Segregation Unit, Intensive Management Unit, or Behavioral Health 

Unit. See Toguchi, 391 F.3d at 1057-60 (a prison official is deliberately 

indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to an 

inmate’s health). Further, Heath failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact 

as to whether his placement in these units denied him the “minimal civilized 

measure of life’s necessities.” Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 347 (1981).

Heath’s motion for appellees’ default is denied.

AFFIRMED.
From: Berge, Jonas

To: Goldsmith, Jason

Cc: McMillan, Shannon L.; Carr, Paul; Jorgenson, Robert

Subject: Re: FW: Chromium Electroplating NESHAP - Data Request

Date: Friday, March 11, 2011 3:07:15 PM

Attachments: Updated Cr Electroplating Plant List - CO.xls

Colorado MACT N Chromium Source Information.zip

Mr. Goldsmith,

Attached are two files containing information requested by RTI on behalf of EPA.

The first attachment is an updated version of the Electroplating Plant List spreadsheet provided in

your request. The update includes information regarding the operational status of the chromeplating facilities. Please note that a majority of the facilities are no longer operational, according

to the State’s emissions inventory.

The second attachment is a .zip file containing multiple documents with pertinent information

regarding three Colorado plating facilities that were judged by the Air Division to be “High Risk”

facilities, based primarily on the proximity of the facility to nearby residential areas. The facilities

selected as being high risk do not correspond to the suggested high risk facilities in the original

plant list provided by RTI. The documents include modified “Electroplating Data Needs” files, as

well as .pdf versions of State-issued construction permits and available performance testing reports

and permit applications.

If you have any questions regarding the information provided to you, or if additional information is

desired, please feel free to contact me.

Cheers,

Jonas Berge

Environmental Protection Specialist

Colorado Air Pollution Control Division

(303) 692-2293

APCD-SSP-B1

4300 Cherry Creek Dr. South

Denver, CO 80246-1530

Fax: (303)782-0278
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (8.13 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, dla, norfolk, Change of Command, People and Culture, Virginia

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3425

_____________________________
B OBBY J OHNSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela M. Cox , Judge

. July 2, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. Davis v. State , 214 So. 2d 399 (Fla 1st DCA 2017).

W ETHERELL , O STERHAUS , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Bobby Johnson, pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appelle e.