Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2012 / Notices 8869 

system(s) (type of facilities constructed 

and their operational status is required). 

Any 38.6–40.0 GHz band licensees 

adjudged not to be providing substantial 

service will not have their license(s) 

renewed. 

The requirement to demonstrate 

substantial service happens once every 

10 years. Every licensee in this band 

will have to make a showing in the next 

three years because of when the licenses 

were originally issued and our decision 

to extend the deadline for some 

licensees. However, the number of 

respondents that will need to comply 

with this substantial service 

requirement of the 47 CFR 101.17 

within the period covered by this 

submission is far less than the 

Commission originally sought and 

received OMB approval in 2006. 

Without this information the 

Commission would not be able to carry 

out its statutory responsibilities. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of 

Managing Director. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3429 Filed 2–14–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Radio Broadcasting Services; AM or 

FM Proposals To Change the 

Community of License 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The following applicants filed 

AM or FM proposals to change the 

community of license: BBC 

BROADCASTING, INC, Station KPRI, 

Facility ID 21416, BP–20090226AAF, 

From FERNDALE, WA, To POINT 

ROBERTS, WA; CUMULUS LICENSING 

LLC, Station WYOK, Facility ID 8680, 

BPH–20120131AJS, From ATMORE, 

AL, To SARALAND, FL; GRACE 

BAPTIST CHURCH OF ORANGE BURG, 

Station NEW, Facility ID 171479, 

BMPED–20120131ALI, From 

RIDGEVILLE, SC, To ST. GEORGE, SC; 

RADIO LICENSE HOLDING II, LLC, 

Station WYAY, Facility ID 48727, BPH– 

20120131AHR, From GAINESVILLE, 

GA, To SANDING SPRINGS, GA. 

DATES: Comments may be filed through 

April 16, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tung Bui, 202–418–2700. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The full 

text of these applications is available for 

inspection and copying during normal 

business hours in the Commission’s 

Reference Center, 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20554 or electronically 

via the Media Bureau’s Consolidated 

Data Base System, http:// 

svartifoss2.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/pubacc/

prod/cdbs_pa.htm. A copy of this 

application may also be purchased from 

the Commission’s duplicating 

contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 

445 12th Street SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1– 

800–378–3160 or www.BCPIWEB.com. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

James D. Bradshaw, 

Deputy Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3561 Filed 2–14–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

Granting of Request for Early 

Termination of the Waiting Period 

Under the Premerger Notification 

Rules 

Section 7A of the Clayton Act, 15 

U.S.C. 18a, as added by Title II of the 

Hart-ScottRodino Antitrust 

Improvements Act of 1976, requires 

persons contemplating certain mergers 

or acquisitions to give the Federal Trade 

Commission and the Assistant Attorney 

General advance notice and to wait 

designated periods before 

consummation of such plans. Section 

7A(b)(2) of the Act permits the agencies, 

in individual cases, to terminate this 

waiting period prior to its expiration 

and requires that notice of this action be 

published in the Federal Register. 

The following transactions were 

granted early termination—on the dates 

indicated—of the waiting period 

provided by law and the premerger 

notification rules. The listing for each 

transaction includes the transaction 

number and the parties to the 

transaction. The grants were made by 

the Federal Trade Commission and the 

Assistant Attorney General for the 

Antitrust Division of the Department of 

Justice. Neither agency intends to take 

any action with respect to these 

proposed acquisitions during the 

applicable waiting period. 

EARLY TERMINATIONS GRANTED JANUARY 1, 2012 THRU JANUARY 31, 2012 

01/03/2012 

20120360 ......... G Pall Corporation; ForteBio, Inc.; Pall Corporation. 

20120362 ......... G Wells Fargo & Company; Long Point Capital Fund. L.P.; Wells Fargo & Company. 

20120363 ......... G Sterling Holdings Ultimate Parent, Inc.; Acxiom Corporation; Sterling Holdings Ultimate Parent, Inc. 

20120364 ......... G Apollo Investment Fund VII, L.P.; Pearls Invest S.a.r.l.; Apollo Investment Fund VII, L.P. 

20120365 ......... G AEI Fisker Investments II, LLC; Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc.; AEI Fisker Investments II, LLC. 

20120367 ......... G Leggett & Platt, Incorporated; Tinicum Capital Partners II, L.P.; Leggett & Platt. Incorporated. 

20120368 ......... G International Business Machines Corporation; DemandTec. Inc.; International Business Machines Corporation. 

20120369 ......... G Tilman J. Fertitta; Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc.; Tilman J. Fertitta. 

20120371 ......... G Baxter International Inc.; Synovis Life Technologies, Inc.; Baxter International Inc. 

01/05/2012 

20120375 ......... G Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc.; GlaxoSmithKline plc; Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. 

20120381 ......... G PTT Global Chemical Public Company; Financiere Foret S.a r.l.; PTT Global Chemical Public Company. 

01/06/2012 

20120334 ......... G Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Pharmasset Inc.; Gilead Sciences, Inc. 

20120352 ......... G Humana Inc.; SeniorBridge Family Companies, Inc.; Humana Inc. 

20120373 ......... G Symantec Corporation; Live0fficeHolding Corporation; Symantec Corporation. 

20120376 ......... G Project Barbour Holdings Corporation; Blue Coat Systems, Inc.; Project Barbour Holdings Corporation. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8870 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2012 / Notices 

EARLY TERMINATIONS GRANTED JANUARY 1, 2012 THRU JANUARY 31, 2012—Continued 

20120379 ......... G Bank of Montreal ; Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.; Bank of Montreal. 

01/09/2012 

20120380 ......... G Wellspring Capital Partners V, L.P.; Sun Capital Partners III QP, L.P.; Wellspring Capital Partners V, L.P. 

20120383 ......... G Bain Capital Fund X, L.P.; SquareTrade, Inc.; Bain Capital Fund X, L.P. 

20120386 ......... G Ann Konecny; Dean Operations, Inc.; Ann Konecny. 

20120387 ......... G Kyocera Corporation; Japan Industrial Fund II, L.P.; Kyocera Corporation. 

01/10/2012 

20120111 ......... G UG1 Corporation; Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.; UGI Corporation. 

20120348 ......... G AbitibiBowater Inc.; Fibrek Inc.; AbitibiBowater Inc. 

01/11/2012 

20120346 ......... G Marian Health System, Inc.; Affinity Health System; Marian Health System, Inc. 

01/12/2012 

20120382 ......... G International Business Machines Corporation; MEP Holdings I, LLC; International Business Machines Corporation. 

20120385 ......... G Lone Star V Fund (U.S.), L.P.; Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.; Lone Star V Fund (U.S.), L.P. 

20120395 ......... G L–3 Communications Holdings, Inc.; Danaher Corporation; L–3 Communications Holdings, Inc. 

20120396 ......... G FMC Technologies, Inc.; Schilling Robotics, Inc.; FMC Technologies, Inc. 

01/13/2012 

20120399 ......... G GS Road Investors, L.L.C.; ArcLight Energy Partners Fund III, L.P.; GS Road Investors, L.L.C. 

20120402 ......... G ESL Partners, L.P.; Sears Holdings Corporation; ESL Partners, L.P. 

20120409 ......... G Det Norske Veritas Foundation; N.V. KEMA; Det Norske Veritas Foundation. 

01/18/2012 

20120377 ......... G Oak Investment Partners X, Limited Partnership; Visto Corporation; Oak Investment Partners X, Limited Partnership. 

01/19/2012 

20120417 ......... G BRH Holdings, L.P.; Michael J. Levitt; BRH Holdings, L.P. 

01/20/2012 

20120411 ......... G InfoSpace, Inc.; TA IX L.P.; InfoSpace, Inc. 

01/23/2012 

20120418 ......... G BE Aerospace, Inc.; Douglas and Catherine Davis; BE Aerospace, Inc. 

20120420 ......... G RTI International Metals, Inc.; Marathon Fund Limited Partnership V; RTI International Metals, Inc. 

20120422 ......... G Sigma-Aldrich Corporation; Avista Capital Partners, L.P.; Sigma-Aldrich Corporation. 

01/24/2012 

20120151 ......... G Oracle Corporation; RightNow Technologies, Inc.; Oracle Corporation 

20120433 ......... G Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.; Thoma Cressey Fund VIII, L.P.; Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. 

20120435 ......... G Lightyear Fund III, L.P.; Sterling Capital Partners II, L.P.; Lightyear Fund III, L.P. 

01/25/2012 

20120428 ......... G Chicago Growth Partners II, L.P.; Diane Trister Dodge; Chicago Growth Partners II, L.P. 

01/26/2012 

20120430 ......... G Cerberus Institutional Partners, L.P.; Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.; Cerberus Institutional Partners, L.P. 

01/27/2012 

20120445 ......... G American Securities Partners V. L.P.; Blue Water Communications Group LLC; American Securities Partners V. L.P. 

20120451 ......... G Anglo American plc; DB Investments S.A.; Anglo American plc. 

01/30/2012 

20120441 ......... G Pembina Pipeline Corporation; Provident Energy Ltd.; Pembina Pipeline Corporation. 

20120454 ......... G Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.; Robert Rosenkranz; Tokio Marine Holdings. Inc. 

01/31/2012 

20120429 ......... G BMC Software, Inc.; Numara Software Holdings, Inc.; BMC Software, Inc. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2012 / Notices 8871 

For Further Information Contact: 

Renee Chapman, Contact 

Representative; or Theresa Kingsberry, 

Legal Assistant; Federal Trade 

Commission, Premerger Notification 

Office,Bureau of Competition, Room H– 

303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326– 

3100. 

By Direction of the Commission. 

Donald S. Clark, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3310 Filed 2–14–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6750–01–M 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Agency for Healthcare Research and 

Quality 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research 

and Quality, HHS. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

intention of the Agency for Healthcare 

Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) approve the proposed 

information collection project: ‘‘Use of 

Deliberative Methods to Enhance Public 

Engagement in the Agency for 

Healthcare Research and Quality’s 

(AHRQ’s) Effective Healthcare (EHC) 

Program and Comparative Effectiveness 

Research (CER) Enterprise.’’ In 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521, 

AHRQ invites the public to comment on 

this proposed information collection. 

This proposed information collection 

was previously published in the Federal 

Register on December 1st, 2011 and 

allowed 60 days for public comment. No 

comments were received. The purpose 

of this notice is to allow an additional 

30 days for public comment. 

DATES: Comments on this notice must be 

received by March 16, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments should 

be submitted to: AHRQ’s OMB Desk 

Officer by fax at (202) 395–6974 

(attention: AHRQ’s desk officer) or by 

email at 

OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov 

(attention: AHRQ’s desk officer). 

Copies of the proposed collection 

plans, data collection instruments, and 

specific details on the estimated burden 

can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports 

Clearance Officer. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports 

Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by 

email at doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Proposed Project 

Use of Deliberative Methods To Enhance 

Public Engagement in the Agency for 

Healthcare Research and Quality’s 

(AHRQ’s) Effective Healthcare (EHC) 

Program and Comparative Effectiveness 

Research (CER) Enterprise 

With this project, AHRQ seeks 

evidence on the feasibility and 

usefulness of public deliberation as an 

approach to obtaining public input on 

questions related to the conduct and use 

of comparative effectiveness research 

(CER). Although stakeholder 

engagement has been central to the 

Effective Healthcare (EHC) program to 

date, public input has not traditionally 

been used to inform and guide broad 

strategies related to the use of evidence 

to inform decisions. This study would 

provide a research base to address this 

gap. This project closely ties to AHRQ’s 

efforts to improve the rigor of methods, 

as it will generate methodological 

evidence through a randomized 

controlled experiment comparing five 

distinct methods of public deliberation 

to find the most effective approaches for 

involving the general public, including 

members of AHRQ’s priority 

populations, in questions related to the 

research enterprise. 

Public deliberation is a strategy for 

engaging lay people in informing 

decisions when these decisions require 

consideration of values and ethics in 

addition to scientific evidence. It 

includes three core elements: 

(1) Convening a group of people 

(either in person or via online 

technologies to connect people in 

remote locations), 

(2) Educating the participants on the 

relevant issue(s) through dissemination 

of educational materials and/or the use 

of content experts, and 

(3) Having the participants engage in 

a reason-based discussion, or 

deliberation, on all sides of the issue(s). 

AHRQ wishes to study the 

effectiveness of public deliberation, 

because it offers the opportunity to 

obtain public input on complex topics 

in an environment that encourages 

participants to educate themselves 

about the topic and discuss it in a 

thoughtful, respectful manner. 

Information about the topic is 

intentionally neutral and respectful of 

the full range of underlying values and 

experience with health care issues in 

the population. This approach is 

designed to improve upon the 

sometimes superficial or ‘‘top of mind’’ 

responses that are often provided by 

public opinion surveys. AHRQ views 

public deliberation as a potential source 

of higher quality public input on issues 

fundamental to the Agency’s mission, 

such as the best and most effective ways 

to use comparative effectiveness 

research, than has heretofore been 

available. 

Several distinct deliberative methods 

have been developed and used 

previously. They share the three core 

elements of public deliberation, but 

differ on key features of implementation 

such as duration, whether they take 

place in-person or online, and the use 

of content experts. Although there is 

considerable theoretical and case study 

literature endorsing the value of public 

deliberation, there has been little 

empirical research about its 

effectiveness and even less about the 

comparative merits of different 

deliberative methods (Community 

Forum Deliberative Methods Literature 

Review, 2010). 

The objectives of this study are to: 

1. Obtain informed and deliberated 

input from lay people on important 

questions underlying AHRQ’s research 

program; and 

2. Expand the evidence base for the 

use of public deliberation methods for 

exploring issues relevant to health care 

research by comparing the outcomes of 

five distinct deliberative methods to a 

control condition and to each other. 

This study is being conducted by 

AHRQ through its contractor, the 

American Institutes of Research (AIR), 

pursuant to AHRQ’s statutory authority 

to (1) promote health care quality 

improvement by conducting and 

supporting both research that develops 

and presents scientific evidence 

regarding all aspects of health care and 

the synthesis and dissemination of 

available scientific evidence for use by 

policymakers, among others, and (2) 

conduct and support research, provide 

technical assistance, and disseminate 

information on healthcare and on 

systems for the delivery of such care. 

See 42 U.S.C. 299(b)(1)(A), (D), (F), and 

(G); 42 U.S.C. 299(b)(2); 42 U.S.C. 

299a(a)(1)–(4). 

Method of Collection 

To achieve the objectives of this study 

the following activities and data 

collections will be implemented: 

(1) Participant recruitment—A short 

screening questionnaire, including a 

brief overview of the study, will be used 

to recruit persons for the study. 

(2) Educational Materials— 

Educational materials are designed to 

inform participants about the topics that 

are being deliberated and will be 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES