alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**WrittenCertification of Chief Executive Officer**

I, James J. Leto,certify that:

1.      I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of GTSI Corp.;

2.      Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.                  Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.                 Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.                  Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, theregistrants’ internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

a.                  All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b.                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: April 2,2007

| /s/ JAMES J. LETO                      |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| James J. Leto                          |   |   |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

----
Page 1










Page 2










Page 3










Page 4










Page 5










Page 6










Page 7










Page 8










Page 9










Page 10










Page 11










Page 12









Page 13










Page 14










Page 15










Page 16










Page 17










Page 18










Page 19










Page 20










Page 21












Page 22
EXHIBIT 22.1


                     BEI ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES





1.   Defense Systems Company,  Inc., a Delaware company, doing business in Texas
     as BEI Defense Systems Company.

2.   BEI Sensors & Systems Company,  Inc., a Delaware company, doing business in
     California and Arkansas as BEI Sensors & Systems Company.

3.   BEI International, Inc., a Delaware company.

4.   BEI Export Sales Co., Inc., a U.S. Virgin Islands company.

5.   BEI Properties, Inc., an Arkansas company.

6.   BEI Medical Systems Company,  Inc., a Delaware  company,  doing business in
     California and New Jersey.
### -82 -80 -78 -76

38 40 42



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 09/25 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          59,063
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,063
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,641
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,284,997)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,063
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,455
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,954
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,420
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,420
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 211 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 211

 Designating September 2013 as ``National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2013

    Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Nelson) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating September 2013 as ``National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness 
                                Month''.

Whereas the estimated 1,275,000 individuals in the United States who live with a 
        spinal cord injury cost society billions of dollars in health care costs 
        and lost wages;
Whereas an estimated 100,000 of those people are veterans who suffered the 
        spinal cord injury while serving as members of the Armed Forces of the 
        United States;
Whereas accidents are the leading cause of spinal cord injuries;
Whereas motor vehicle crashes are the second leading cause of spinal cord and 
        traumatic brain injuries;
Whereas 70 percent of all spinal cord injuries that occur in children under the 
        age of 18 are a result of motor vehicle accidents;
Whereas every 48 minutes a person will become paralyzed, underscoring the urgent 
        need to develop new neuroprotection, pharmacological, and regeneration 
        treatments to reduce, prevent, and reverse paralysis; and
Whereas increased education and investment in research are key factors in 
        improving outcomes for victims of spinal cord injuries, improving the 
        quality of life of victims, and ultimately curing paralysis: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates September 2013 as ``National Spinal Cord 
        Injury Awareness Month'';
            (2) supports the goals and ideals of National Spinal Cord 
        Injury Awareness Month;
            (3) continues to support research to find better 
        treatments, therapies, and a cure for paralysis;
            (4) supports clinical trials for new therapies that offer 
        promise and hope to those persons living with paralysis; and
            (5) commends the dedication of local, regional, and 
        national organizations, researchers, doctors, volunteers, and 
        people across the United States that are working to improve the 
        quality of life of people living with paralysis and their 
        families.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.56 MB)

Tags:CVN 74, USS John C. Stennis 

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.13 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, DSCR, 241st Marine Corps Birthday, MARINE CORPS

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### PARKER v. JOHNSTON, Warden.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 17, 1940.

Homer Zeaman Parker, in propria persona.

No other appearance entered.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is upon application for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, “from an opinion and order of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, Southern Division, issued on the twenty-sixth day of October in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred thirty-nine, and from an order and certificate of the same court of December eighth, year aforesaid, denying appeal and certifying the grounds for appeal are frivolous”. In view of this certificate of the trial court the application is denied. See, Smith et al. v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 109 F.2d 152, filed by this court, January 15, 1940.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 9707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3840]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Meeting of the ACRS 
Subcommittee on Power Uprates; Revision to February 23, 2012, ACRS 
Meeting Federal Register Notice

    The Federal Register Notice for the ACRS Subcommittee meeting on 
Power Uprates, scheduled to be held on February 23, 2012, is being 
revised to notify the following:
    The meeting has been moved to Friday, February 24, 2012, from 8:30 
a.m. to 5 p.m.
    The notice of this meeting was previously published in the Federal 
Register on January 30, 2012 [77 FR 4585-4586]. All other items remain 
the same as previously published.
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting Weidong Wang, Designated Federal Official (Telephone: 301-
415-6279, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1f6c4c8c5cecfc68ff6c0cfc6e1cfd3c28fc6ced7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f1a69498959e9f96dfa6909f96b19f8392df969e87">[email protected]</span></a>) between 7:30 a.m. and 5:15 p.m. 
(ET).

    Dated: February 13, 2012.
Antonio F. Dias,
Technical Advisor, Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2012-3840 Filed 2-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Opinion filed May 9, 2019

 

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-18-00231-CR

__________

LAURA SUSAN DEMATTI, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 142nd District Court

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR48631

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Laura Susan Dematti entered an open plea of guilty to the first-degree felony 

offense of solicitation of capital murder. The trial court convicted her of that offense 

and assessed her punishment at confinement for ten years. We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed in this court a motion to 

withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and 

conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and concludes that the

appeal is frivolous and without merit. Counsel provided Appellant with a copy of 
2

the brief, a copy of the motion to withdraw, and a copy of both the clerk’s record 

and the reporter’s record. Counsel advised Appellant of her right to review the 

record and file a response to counsel’s brief. Counsel also advised Appellant of her

right to file a petition for discretionary review with the clerk of the Texas Court of 

Criminal Appeals seeking review by that court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68. Courtappointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967); Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re 

Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); and Stafford v. State, 813 

S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 

Appellant has not filed a response to counsel’s Anders brief. Following the 

procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the 

record, and we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit.1

 

We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the 

trial court. 

PER CURIAM

May 9, 2019

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.2

Willson, J., not participating.

 1

We note that Appellant has a right to file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to TEX. R.

APP. P. 68.

2

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
#### Charles Eddie GRIFFITH, Petitioner, v. SPECIAL INDEMNITY FUND and The Workers’ Compensation Court, Respondents.

No. 72474.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Jan. 30, 1990.

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR CERTIORARI TO REVIEW AN OPINION BY THE COURT OF APPEALS, DIVISION I

On consideration of the paperwork on file, which consists of the petition for cer-tiorari by the Special Indemnity Fund, respondent and cross-petitioner [SIF], the petitioner’s answer and of this court’s November 9, 1989 order directing SIF to amend its certiorari petition by November 15, 1989, THE COURT FINDS AND HOLDS:

1.SIF’s belated filing of its rehearing petition in the Court of Appeals was met with denial based on “out-of-time filing without leave”.

2. Neither in the intermediate court nor here did SIF offer a tenable legal ground or “good cause” for its tardiness.

3. Although this court’s pronouncement in *Special Indem. Fund v. Washburn,*Okl., 722 P.2d 1204, 1211 [1986], does not bar one whose rehearing petition was not timely filed in the Court of Appeals from consideration of a later quest for certio-rari, neither does it require this court’s acceptance of such petition where tardiness appears unexcused on the face of the record. See also, *Stiles v. Oklahoma Tax Com’n.,*Okl., 752 P.2d 800 [1987],

4. Unlike in *Washburn,*this record is devoid of any “good cause” for SIF’s tardy filing of its rehearing petition in the Court of Appeals, Division I.

5. SIF’s petition for certiorari, whose amendment was directed by this court but its command was ignored, is hereby DISMISSED for failure timely to petition for rehearing in the Court of Appeals or show to that or this tribunal a good cause for a retroactive extension of time to present, belatedly, its rehearing quest below.

PETITION FOR CERTIORARI DISMISSED.

OPALA, V.C.J., and LAVENDER, DOOLIN, ALMA WILSON and KAUGER, JJ., concur.

HODGES, SIMMS and SUMMERS, JJ., dissent.

HODGES, J.,

with whom SIMMS and SUMMERS, JJ., join, dissenting: I would deny the petition for certiorari.
#### BANK OF WILSON, Appellant, v. T.H. HARTMAN, Appellee.

No. 71347.

Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1.

Dec. 26, 1989.

Thomas R. Carlock, Gregory L. Johnson, Ardmore, for appellant,

Charles E. Roberts, Marietta, for appel-lee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PATRICIA DOUGHERTY MacGUIGAN, Judge:

Proceeding in the District Court of Carter County, Bank of Wilson (Bank) obtained a judgment on a note and foreclosure of the mortgage given by T.H. Hartman (Hartman) securing real property situated in Love County. On December 16, 1987, Bank filed another petition, this time in Love County, to foreclose the mortgage on the same realty and for money judgment on the same note. On February 1, 1988, the Bank made application to the Carter County District Court to vacate the prior judgment as to the mortgage foreclosure only. The Bank then filed an amended petition in Love County seeking only foreclosure of the real property.

Hartman moved to dismiss the action in Love County on the grounds of estoppel, res judicata and improper splitting of a cause of action. Bank filed a response and a hearing on the motion was held. After supplemental briefings by both parties, the trial court granted Hartman’s motion to dismiss.

The Bank asserts on appeal that the trial court erred in dismissing its foreclosure action. The Bank asserts that since the real property was located in Love County, *339the Carter County District Court was without venue to determine right, title and interest to the property. We agree. Tit. 12 O.S.1981 § 131 mandates an action foreclosing real property be brought in the county in which it is situated. The action was instead brought in neighboring Carter County. When an order was entered vacating the judgment in that action, the issue of right, title and interest in Love County real property was subject to determination by the trial court sitting in Love County, the county of situs of the mortgaged real property.

An action to obtain a judgment against an individual for money due and owing as evidenced by a note, is a transitory action. It is an action in personam and can be brought where proper service can be obtained. An action in foreclosure, is in rem. *Pettis v. Johnston,*190 P. 681, 78 Okl. 277 (1920). It must be brought in the county the real property is located. Tit. 12 O.S.1981 § 131. A foreclosure action may be separated from an action on the underlying note, and if tried separately is one of equitable cognizance. *Irwin v. Sands,*265 P.2d 1097 (Okl.1954).

As an action in foreclosure is one of equitable cognizance, we will not sustain on appeal an action that is contrary to established principles of equity. *Paris Bank of Texas v. Custer,*681 P.2d 71 (Okl.1984). Bank may bring its separate action in foreclosure in the proper county, that in which the real property is located.

REVERSED.

GARRETT, P.J., and HUNTER, J„ concur.