alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.8 MB)

Tags:ras, 15TH MEU, uss san diego, AMERICA ARG

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 23.2

                INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN

Section 11(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time
it becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements
therein not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant as such
registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition
such person knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among
others, an accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part
of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in
connection with the registration statement.

GTSI Corp. dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") as its independent
auditors, effective July 11, 2002. For additional information, see GTSI Corp.'s
current report on Form 8-K dated July 16, 2002. After reasonable efforts, GTSI
Corp. has been unable to obtain Andersen's written consent to the incorporation
by reference into GTSI Corp.'s registration statements (File Nos. 33-44363,
33-55090, 333-29439, 333-62681, 333-78199, 333-44922, and 33-59478) of
Andersen's audit report with respect to GTSI Corp.'s consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2001, and for the two years in the period then
ended. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits
GTSI Corp. to file this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated by
reference into the Registration Statements, without consents from Andersen. As a
result, with respect to transactions in GTSI Corp. securities pursuant to the
Registration Statement that occur subsequent to the date this Annual Report on
Form 10-K is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Andersen will
not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue
statements of a material fact contained in the financial statement audited by
Andersen or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein.
Accordingly, you would not be unable to assert a claim against Andersen under
Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.


                                       97
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 283 

To constitute the majority party’s membership on certain committees for 

the One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, or until their successors are chosen. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 31, 2013 

Mr. REID submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed 

to 

RESOLUTION 

To constitute the majority party’s membership on certain 

committees for the One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, 

or until their successors are chosen. 

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the ma2 jority party’s membership on the following committees for 

3 the One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, or until their suc4 cessors are chosen: 

5 COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANS6 PORTATION: Mr. Rockefeller (Chairman), Mrs. Boxer, Mr. 

7 Nelson, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Pryor, Mrs. McCaskill, Ms. 

8 Klobuchar, Mr. Warner, Mr. Begich, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. 

9 Schatz, Mr. Markey, Mr. Booker. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 283 ATS 

1 COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS: 

2 Mrs. Boxer (Chairman), Mr. Baucus, Mr. Carper, Mr. 

3 Cardin, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Udall of New 

4 Mexico, Mr. Merkley, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Booker. 

5 COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRE6 NEURSHIP: Ms. Landrieu (Chairman), Mr. Levin, Ms. 

7 Cantwell, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Cardin, Mrs. Shaheen, Mrs. 

8 Hagan, Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. Markey, Mr. Booker. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10(e)(15) 


Annual Performance Incentive Plan for 2015 (“2015 APIP”) 


Under the 2015 APIP, executive officers of the Company are eligible to receive performance related cash payments. Payments are, in general, only made if performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) are met. 


The Committee previously approved an incentive target opportunity for 2015, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for each participating officer. The Committee also established overall threshold, target and maximum performance metrics for the 2015 APIP.  Certain additional goals were established for some officers based on business unit measures.  Additionally, the Committee had established an opportunity for an individual performance component whereby the Committee has the authority to increase or decrease the award, subject to the limitations of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.  The performance measures and weightings were adjusted earnings per share (weighted at 50%), operating cash flow (weighted at 20%) and constant currency revenue growth (adjusted to exclude the impact of changes in the translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars) (weighted at 30%).


The performance against the 2015 APIP goals was as follows:  adjusted earnings per share was at threshold, operating cash flow was below target, and constant currency revenue growth was below threshold.  



1











2
ex10-2.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2

 

 

 

Summary Description of Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

 

 

 

Our annual executive incentive bonuses are intended to compensate officers for achieving our annual financial goals at corporate levels (and for achieving measurable individual annual performance objectives). Our annual incentive bonus plan provides for a cash bonus, dependent upon the level of achievement of the stated corporate goals (and personal performance goals), calculated as a percentage of the officer's base salary. The annual incentive bonus ties incentive compensation to net earnings per share as reported in the Company’s audited financial statements adjusted for certain items (“BEPS”). Under this plan, the Compensation Committee establishes a minimum BEPS target that must be reached before any bonuses are earned. The target BEPS is based upon the annually established financial growth plan and goal. The Compensation Committee also establishes for each participant in the Plan, including executive officers, individual incentive amounts (“TIA”) that may be earned, in whole or in part, depending upon whether the minimum BEPS target is reached and by how much it is exceeded during the fiscal year. At the minimum target BEPS level, the plan participants will earn a bonus equal to 20% of the TIA. For 2016, the target incentive awards (as a percentage of base salary) will be as follows: Chief Executive Officer, 50%; Chief Financial Officer, 40%; President, 40% and Executive Vice President, 40%. The payout continues to increase as BEPS increases and there is no maximum bonus payment.   The BEPS level for 100% payout of the TIA is equal to $0.82 per share.  The Company’s BEPS was $1.04 for the year ended December 31, 2015 and $0.99 for the year ended December 31, 2014. Any incentive compensation earned under this plan is paid during February of the following year.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Trio Resource, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2014, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, J. Duncan Reid, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The
                                         Report on Form Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014, fully complies with the
                                         requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The
                                         information contained in the Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014,
                                         fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                                         of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:
    July 17, 2014 | By: | /s/
    J. Duncan Reid                                                 
|----------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |     | J.
    Duncan Reid                                                     
|                        |     | Principal
        Executive Officer
        Trio
        Resource, Inc.
Exhibit 23.1

Ryder Scott Company
Petroleum Consultants

1100 Louisiana                                              Fax (713) 651-0849
Suite 3800
Houston, TX  77002-5218                               Telephone (713) 651-9191






                      CONSENT OF PETROLEUM CONSULTING FIRM




      We consent to the  reference to our name included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 for Geodyne Instituitonal/Pension
Energy Income P-1 Limited Partnership.


                              //s// Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

                              RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.




Houston, Texas
March 14, 2005
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40697 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ARTURO PACHECO

- ZAVALA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16

- CR

- 859

- 1

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Arturo Pacheco

- Zavala has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pacheco

- Zavala h a s not filed a response. We have revi ewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. As did counsel, we have reviewed both Pacheco

- Zavala’s current conviction and his

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 26, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40697 Document: 00514657113 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/26/2018No. 17

- 40697

2 revocation proceedings. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonf rivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-40697 Document: 00514657113 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/26/2018
Internet Capital Group, Inc. Compensation Clawback Policy


 Exhibit 10.1 

INTERNET CAPITAL GROUP, INC. 

COMPENSATION CLAWBACK POLICY 

Effective as of April 12, 2010 

In addition to any other remedies available to Internet Capital Group, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “ICG”), if the
Board of Directors of Internet Capital Group, Inc. (the “Board”) (or, at the discretion of the Board, a duly authorized committee of the Board) determines in its sole discretion that it is appropriate, ICG may recover (in whole or in part)
any performance-based bonus or other incentive-based compensation paid to any officer of ICG after the date hereof to the extent that such bonus or compensation is based upon any financial results that were impacted by such officer’s fraud or
intentional misconduct.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2.1 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Rosenbaum-Grinell, Inc., Petitioner, and Bart Schwartz International Textiles, Ltd., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

December 8, 1958.

*451
      *Guzik S Boukstein (Leo Guzik*and *Edward I. Friedman*of counsel), for petitioner.

*Edelman & Schneer*for respondent.

Feas oís X. Cowlon, J.

Petitioner claims that no arbitrable dispute is presented. The right to object to the arbitration on this ground was waived by the selection of an arbitrator by petitioner’s then attorney. Where a party has participated in the selection of an arbitrator, he is limited to the objections specified in subdivision 1 of section 1458 of the Civil Practice Act, which do not include the right to stay the arbitration on the ground urged by petitioner. Subdivision 2 of this section permits a party who has *not*participated in the selection of an arbitrator to put in issue “ the failure to comply” with the contract containing an arbitration provision, thus mating it clear that a party who has participated in the selection of an arbitrator may not claim that there is no failure on his part to comply with the arbitration clause. What petitioner is now claiming is that because the dispute is not arbitrable, he has not failed to comply with the contract between the parties calling for arbitration. By participating in the selection of an arbitrator, petitioner has waived its right to assert such a el aim.

Moreover, it appears that there is an arbitrable dispute between the parties. Respondent claims that the failure to deliver within the time prescribed in the contract was due to respondent’s compliance with petitioner’s request to hold up delivery until a spongers’ strike was over. Whether or not the failure to deliver was due to such a request by petitioner is for the arbitrator to determine. If it was, the Statute of Frauds (Personal Property Law, § 33-c) would not avail the petitioner, for the latter would be estopped by its conduct from el aiming *452the benefit of the statute *(Imperator Realty Co.*v. *Tull,*228 N. Y. 447; *Thomson*v. *Poor,*147 N. Y. 402, 409).

The claim that the contract is illegal may not be asserted at this time, in view of petitioner’s participation in the selection of an arbitrator, but even if this were not so, petitioner has failed to establish that the effect of the provision complained of might be *“*to substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly.” In the absence of such proof, the contract may not be held to be illegal.

The motion to stay the arbitration is denied.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, Mark Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President, in connection with the Quarterly Report of CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 30, 2012
  /s/ Mark Gatto

Mark Gatto

Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President

(Principal Executive Officer)

CĪON Investment Corporation
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


     The Company's subsidiaries, fictitious business names (if any) under which
they do business, percentage of ownership, and the state or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization of each are set forth below.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     PERCENTAGE      STATE OR COUNTRY     FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
SUBSIDIARY                          OF OWNERSHIP     OF INCORPORATION        NAME (IF ANY)

<S>                                     <C>             <C>               <C>
Associated Health Services, Inc.        100%            Delaware
Associated Medication Services, Inc.    100%            Delaware
Asthma & Allergy CareAmerica, Inc.      100%            Nevada
Vivra Renal Care, Inc.**                100%            Nevada
Community Dialysis Supply Corp.         100%            Florida
Vivra Health Advantage, Inc.            100%            Nevada
VNS                                      75%            Florida
PCHS Co., Inc.                          100%            California
Specialty Care America, Inc.***         100%            Delaware          Nephrology Services Group/
                                                                          Vivra Nephrology Partners
Surgical Partners of America, Inc.      100%            California
Vivra Heart Services, Inc.                              Nevada
Vivra OB-GYN, Inc.                                      Nevada
Vivra Orthopedics, Inc.                                 Delaware
Vivra Specialty Partners, Inc.                          Nevada
Vivra Physician Services, Inc.          100%            Delaware
VPSL CORPORATION                        100%*           Delaware
   Celsus of Louisville
Vivra Physician Services of
   Colorado Springs, Inc.                83%*           Delaware
Vivra Laboratories, Inc.                100%            Nevada

*    Vivra Physician Services, Inc., is 100% owner of VPSL CORPORATION and Vivra
     Physician Services of Colorado Springs, Inc.

**   Occasionally owns as subsidiaries clinics acquired in pooling transactions.

***  Owns approximately ten subsidiaries which operate nephrology practices.


</TABLE>