alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Audrey C. McAlpin, Plaintiff, *v.*George V. Browne, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

October 29, 1958.

*256*Martin, Clearwater & Bell (John H. Tovey, Jr.,*of counsel), for defendant.

*Hecht, Hadfield, Farbach & McAlpin (J. Arthur Ijeve*of counsel), for plaintiff.

Vincent A. Ltjpiano, J.

Defendant moves for dismissal of the complaint upon the ground that the action therein described is time barred. If the stated causes are for malpractice they are barred. 'The court is not confronted with 'any question of sufficiency of the alleged causes nor plaintiff’s ability to prove the claims.

In the first cause, plaintiff alleges that the defendant had contracted to perform exclusively and personally upon plaintiff a 1 ‘ Caldwell-Luc ’ ’ operation; that said operation was performed during anesthesis and without plaintiff’s consent in part, if not in whole, by a surgeon other than the defendant; that in fact a “ Caldwell-Luc” operation was not performed upon her and that defendant in failing to perform said operation exclusively and permitting its performance by another, in whole or in part, breached the contract.

In the second cause of action, it is alleged that subsequent to the operation defendant represented that he had performed it himself and that he had performed a “ C'aldwell-Luc ” operation without the participation of any other person. The representation was false in that the operation was performed in a major part thereof by a surgeon other than the defendant. Upon discovery of the facts plaintiff was advised that in order to save her life the performance of a “ Caldwell-Luc” operation was necessary. The breach thus alleged is not in negligent performance, which despite nomenclature would constitute a cause in malpractice, but rather a total failure of performance *257with respect to sole conduct of a “ Caldwell-Lue ” operation which was the operation to he undertaken with plaintiff’s consent. The deceit is not with respect to the manner of performance of the contract or of any incident thereof, but rather with respect to the stated fact that the operation was performed and that it was performed by the defendant.

The motion is denied.
Kenneth Williams, sUASMake & Model I certify that the aircraft is in an airworthy condition and that a daily Log Page Ser # inspection has been performed IAW the operators Maintenance Procedures. N# Time Today A/F T.T. Eng T.T. 1 LF Eng T.T. 2 LR Eng T.T. 3 RF Eng T.T. 4 RR Date: Daily Signature

Maintenance Discrepancy Maintenance Performed Close Out Weekly
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                        RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
                              1995 STOCK OPTION PLAN

Ramtron International Corporation's 1995 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") shall
be amended as follows:

The text of Section 2(h) of the Plan, entitled "Disinterested Person," is
hereby deleted in its entirety.

A new sub-section is hereby inserted as sub-section (h) to read in its
entirety as follows:

     "Non-Employee Director" shall have the meaning of such term under, and
shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with, Rule 16b-3 promulgated by
the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended from time to time (the "Exchange Act").  "Director" shall
mean a duly elected and qualified member of the Board of Directors.

Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

     The Plan shall be administered by the Board of Directors or, if appointed
pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors, by a Committee designated
by the Board of Directors to administer the Plan.  If so appointed, the
Committee shall be comprised of not less than two persons.  Members of the
Committee shall serve for such period of time as the Board of Directors may
determine.  From time to time the Board of Directors may increase the size of
the Committee and appoint additional members thereto, remove members (with or
without cause) and appoint new members in substitution therefor, fill
vacancies however caused, or remove all members of the Committee and
thereafter directly administer the Plan.  In the event the Company has a class
of equity securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act and
unless the Board of Directors determines otherwise, from the effective date of
such registration until six months after the termination of such registration,
all grants of Options to persons subject to the provisions of Section 16(b) of
the Exchange Act shall be made by the Board of Directors in accordance with
the recommendations of a Committee of two or more persons having full
authority to act in the matter and all of whom are Non-Employee Directors.

The text of Section 9 of the Plan, entitled "Holding Period," is hereby
deleted in its entirety.

Dated:  October 24, 1996
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.15 MB)

Tags:Loglines, rations, Sealed packaging

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DE Acquisition 9, Inc., for the quarter ending November 30, 2011, I, Ruth Shepley, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  1. Such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending November 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2011, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DE Acquisition 9, Inc.  Dated:  January 13, 2012   DE ACQUISITION 9, INC.  By:/s/  Ruth Shepley
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
### US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDA RD S FOR

SMALL ELECTRIC MOTORS U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW 

### Washington, DC 20585 Room 1E-245 September 13, 2007 Purpose The Department is holding this informal public meeting as a first step in the standards rulemaking process for small electric motors. This meeting is intended to familiarize interested stakeholders with the approach and analytical tools that the DOE proposes to use in its analysis for proposed standards for these motors. The meeting will solicit feedback on the assumptions, methodology, and analytical tools DOE proposes to use in this rulemaking. 

## Agenda 9:00 - 9:05 am Welcome 9:05 - 9:20 am Introduction , agenda review, and opening remarks

Antonio Bouza 9:20 - 9 : 30 am Rulemaking overview and analytical methodology

Antonio Bouza 

### ANOPR ANALYSIS 9:30 - 10 : 30 am Market and Technology Assessment Mahima Gupta 

### 10:30

- 10:45 am Break 10:45 - 11:30 am Screening Analysis , Engineering Analysis , and Preliminary Manufacturer Impact Analysis Mahima Gupta and Michael Scholand 11:30

- 12:00 am Discussion of Pertinent Issues 12:00 - 1:00 pm Break for Lunch (on your own)1:00 - 1:45 pm Markups for Equipment Price Determination, Energy Use and End-Use Load Characterization, and Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis Robert Van Buskirk 1:45 - 2:15 pm Shipments Analysis and National Impact Analysis

Robert Van Buskirk 2:15 - 2:45 pm Discussion of Pertinent Issues 2:45 - 3:00 pm Break



### NOPR ANALYSIS 3:00 - 3:30 pm Revisions to ANOPR analyses and LCC Subgroup Analysis,

Manufacturer Impact Analysis 3:30 - 4:00 pm Utility Impact Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis,

Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Impact Analysis Robert Van Buskirk 

### FINAL RULE 4:00 - 5:00 pm Other Issues and Comments, Closing Remarks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997
     AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-27-1996
<CASH>                                          9,271
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     2,939
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,464
<PP&E>                                          1,591
<DEPRECIATION>                                    780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 22,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,379
<BONDS>                                            22
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           10
<OTHER-SE>                                     17,650
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   22,584
<SALES>                                        10,005
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,141
<CGS>                                           5,972
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   5,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                9,747
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 70
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,648)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,300)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,348)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  4,583
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.03
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Grace A. Edstrom, Appellant.

County Court, Nassau County,

May 28, 1958.

*Patrick J. Beary*for appellant.

*Frank A. Gulotta, District Attorney,*for respondent.

Johh P. Dowohoe

(Putnam County Judge and Acting Judge for Nassau County). This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction after trial in the Nassau County District Court for a violation of section 1433 of the Penal Law (malicious mischief; injury to property).

On September 17,1957 an information was filed in the Nassau County District Court charging the defendant with a violation of section 1433 of the Penal Law in that the defendant unlaw*568fully and willfully destroyed certain property of another, *‘ ‘*to wit, defendant threw a foreign substance on shrubs and flowering bushes on the above premises, the value of property injured or destroyed thereof by reason of the foregoing was less than $100.00.” In the course of a somewhat lengthy trial the People established that the shrub which was allegedly injured was an Azalea bush planted on the complaining witness ’ private property. On cross-examination, the People’s horticultural expert testified that the Azalea bush is classified as an ornamental plant.

Appellant contends that the conviction must be reversed on the ground that she was charged and convicted for a violation of a section of the Penal Law which had no application to the alleged offense. Her argument is that section 1433 of the Penal Law applies to cases involving destruction or injury of the property of another “ where the punishment is not specially prescribed by statute.” The damage to an ornamental plant situated on private grounds, however, is covered and made a misdemeanor by virtue of section 1427 of the Penal Law. Thus, the appellant argues, the present criminal prosecution was one in respect of which punishment for the act of the defendant was specially prescribed by statute and, that being so, section 1433 of the Penal Law, under which she was convicted, has no application herein.

That very contention was passed upon by the Court of Appeals in *People*v. *Costello*(305 N. Y. 63) and was sustained by a unanimous court.

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is reversed and the information dismissed. Submit order.
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

MetLife Building

200 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10166



Spencer G. Feldman

212-801-9221

E-mail: feldmans@gtlaw.com



February 14, 2013



VIA EDGAR



U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549



| | Re: | Gold Party Payday, Inc. — Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------
| |     | for the Quarter ended December 31, 2012                



Dear Sirs:



On behalf of
Gold Party Payday, Inc., a Delaware corporation, we hereby submit in electronic format for filing with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 101(a) (1) (iii) of Regulation S-T, one
copy of Gold Party Payday, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2012.



Please address
any comments or questions that you may have concerning the Form 10-Q to Tatum L. Morita, Gold Party Payday’s President, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or to me.



Very truly yours,



/s/ Spencer G. Feldman



Spencer G. Feldman



Encls.



cc:	   Mr. Tatum L. Morita
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.61 MB)

Tags:Loglines, Workforce Recruitment Program, September 2017

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 8888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3544]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, Clinical Trial 
Review.
    Date: February 21, 2012.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Christine A. Livingston, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National 
Institutes of Health/NIDCD, 6120 Executive Blvd.--MSC 7180, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-8683 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#264a4f504f48415545664b474f4a08484f4e08414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b57524d52555c48587b565a525715555253155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/about/groups/sep/, where an agenda 
and any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 9, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-3544 Filed 2-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-4729
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DANNY ALONOZA SURRATT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (4:93-cr-00083-LHT) Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 25, 2008 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold M. Vaught, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Danny Alonoza Surratt appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing a four-month custodial sentence. Surratt’s attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but questioning whether Surratt’s sentence violates the Ex Post Facto Clause. Surratt has been informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done so. During the pendency of this appeal, Surratt has been discharged from federal custody. Moreover, his sentence did not include a term of supervised release, and there are no continuing collateral consequences from the district court’s judgment on revocation of supervised release. Accordingly, the appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna , 523 U.S. 1, 10 (1998). In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record and found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore dismiss Surratt’s appeal as moot. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition to the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions- 3 - are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED