T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T A N I TA B. CA RR, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. LI BERTY LI FE A SSU RA N CE C O M P A N Y , aM a s s a c hus e tt s C orpor a t i on; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 15738 D. C . No . 3 : 0 5 - c v - 0 3 1 9 0 - T HE ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia T he l t on E . H e nde r s on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d J ul y19, 2010 ** B e f o r e : B . F L E T C H E R , R E I N H A R D T , a n d W A R D L A W , C ir c u it J u d g e s . A ni t aB . C a rrappe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntc om pe l l i ng bi nd i ng arbi tra t i on , confi rm i ng the arbi tra t i on aw ar d, and d enyi ng l ea ve t o fi l e a 

# FI LED AU G 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 15738 2 s e c ond a m e nde d c om pl a i nti n he rdi s abi l i tybe ne f i t s s ui tunde rthe E m pl oy m e nt Re t i r e me n tI n c o me Se c u r i tyA c t( “ ERI SA ” ) . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o th e c o n f irm a tio n o f

a n a rb itr a tio n a w a r d , P o w e r a g e n t, Inc. v. E lec . D ata S

ys . , 358 F . 3d 1187, 1193 ( 9th C i r . 2004) , a nd f ora n abus e of d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f

le a v e to a m e n d , Ca s w e ll v . Ca lde r o n , 363 F . 3d 832, 836 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e a f

f irm in p a rt a n d d is m is s in p a rt. W e di s m i s s a s unt i m e l yC a rr ’ s appe a l of the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s J a nua ry10 a nd June 22 , 20 06 orders com pel l i ng bi nd i ng arbi tra t i on and d i sm i ss i ng the ca se . See F ed. R . A pp . P . 4(a) (1)( A ) ( prov i di ng 18 0 d ay s t o app ea l fr om fi nal order on w hi ch n o ju d g m e n t is e n te r e d ) . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y c on fi rm ed the arbi tra t i on aw ar d b ec ause , af t er c o n s e n tin g to a n d m o v in g to c o m p e l b in d in g a rb itr a tio n , C a rrw a s ju d ic ia lly e s t oppe d f

r om obj e c t i ng t o the a w a r d on the gr ound tha tthe a rbi tr a t i on w a s not b in d in g o n h e ru n d e rE R I S A r e g u la tio n s . See P ow erag ent , Inc. , 358 F . 3d a t1192- 93 ( p a rtyo n w h o s e c o n s e n t to a rb itr a to r ’s au th o r ityth e c o u rt r e lie d is ju d ic ia lly e s to p p e d f

r o m g a in in g u n f

a ira d v a n ta g e b ya s s e rtin g c le a r lyin c o n s is te n t p o s itio n ) . T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng C arr l ea ve t o fi l e a s e c o n d a m e n d e d c o m p la in t o n g r o u n d s th a t it w o u ld b e f u tile to r e o p e n h e rc a s e .09- 15738 3 See Ca s w e ll , 3 6 3 F .3 d a t 8 3 7 ( n o ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g le a v e to a d d f u tile equal prot ec t i on cl ai m ). T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt a ls o d id n o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g C a rr ’s p o s tj udgm e ntm ot i ons f

orr e c ons i de r a t i on, t o s e ta s i de the j udgm e nt , t o va c a t e the aw ar d, or for di sc ov ery bec ause she f ai l ed t o est abl i sh any groun d t o w arrantsuch r e lie f . See 9 U . S . C . §§ 10 -12 (F eder al A rbi trat i on A ctprov i si on s a l l ow i ng l i m i t ed ju d ic ia l r e v ie w o f

a rb itr a l a w a r d s ) ; L at

shaw v. T

rai ner , 452 F . 3d 1097, 1102- 03 (9th C i r. 20 06 ) ( nei ther party’ s m i st aken bel i ef s nor her a tt orney’ s a l l eged m alprac t i ce w arrant s r ec on si dera t i on of j ud gm entor si m i l arre l i ef un der F eder al R u le o f C iv il P r o c e d u r e 6 0 ( b ) ) ; H al le t t v . Mor gan , 29 6 F . 3d 73 2, 75 1 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( no abuse of di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng di sc ov ery) . C arr’ s r equestfor e ntryof defaul ti s deni ed bu ther r equest s f or j ud i ci al not i c e a r e gr a nt e d. C a rr ’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons a r e unpe r s ua s i ve , a nd w e do not c o n s id e ris s u e s r a is e d f

o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. See Fo t iv. C i t y o f Men lo P a rk , 14 6 F . 3d 62 9, 23 8 (9th C i r. 19 98 ). A F F IR M E D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art .