alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 22.1

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF WEIRTON STEEL CORPORATION



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Percentage owned  
Subsidiary                                   by Registrant              State of Incorporation
----------                                   -------------              ----------------------

<S>                                          <C>                        <C>
Weirton Receivables, Inc.                        100%                          Delaware
Weirton Venture Holdings Corp.                   100%                          Delaware
Weirton Coatings L.L.C.                          100%                          Delaware
MetalSite General Partner, LLC                    94%*                         Delaware
MetalSite, L.P.                                   92%*                         Delaware
</TABLE>





*Percentage indicated is Weirton Steel Corporation's economic interest in the
subsidiary
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.29 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, F-15 Eagle , Warner Robins Air Logistics Complex, 402nd  Maintenance Support Group, 573rd Commodities Manufacturing Squadron , organic manufacture , USAF, Robins Air Force Base, AIR FORCE, Warfighter Support

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.81 MB)

Tags:Pathways to Career Excellence program, Col Mark Simerly, Warfighter First, DLA Troop Support

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### Commonwealth vs. Jose Santiago.

No. 95-P-1220.

September 20, 1996.

*Controlled Substances. Intent. Practice, Criminal,*Argument by prosecutor. *Evidence,*Opinion.

The defendant urges us to reverse his conviction for possession of heroin with intent to distribute it (his second such offense) on the ground that a question and answer by the prosecutor and her detective expert witness usurped the jury’s function by opining the defendant’s guilt. See *Commonwealth*v. *Woods,*419 Mass. 366, 374-375 (1995). See also Liacos, Massachusetts Evidence § 7.3 (6th ed. 1994). We affirm the conviction, but not on the basis urged by the Commonwealth.

When the defendant was arrested, after a police chase, he had thirteen small bags of heroin in his possession, and he had just discarded five other bags. His defense to the charge was that the heroin was intended for his *917personal use, not distribution. The assistant district attorney, an experienced prosecutor, asked the veteran detective, “. . . do you have an opinion as to whether or not that amount of heroin is consistent or inconsistent with personal use?” The witness answered: “It’s inconsistent with personal use.” So far, so good. Unwilling to let well enough alone, however, the prosecutor next asked: “Now, do you have an opinion ... to whether or not this amount of heroin packaged in this manner *was intended for*distribution or for personal use?” (emphasis added). The witness answered: “Distribution.”

*J. Daniel Silverman*for the defendant.

*Nicole M. Procida,*Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

The foregoing answers were nonresponsive, but they were not objected to on that ground or any other, and the defendant’s only complaint here is that the question and answer about his intent, because they constituted an opinion as to his guilt, were so improper as to create a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice.

In its brief on appeal and at oral argument, the Commonwealth maintains that the question and answer about the defendant’s intent were proper ones. That is incorrect. Where a specified intent is an element of the crime, a witness’s opinion as to what the defendant intended is improper. Standing alone, such evidence cannot sustain a conviction.

We affirm the conviction because, in light of the other evidence, including the defendant’s testimony that he intended to give some of the heroin to his girlfriend, “the admission of the improper testimony was not substantially prejudicial.” *Commonwealth*v. *Woods,*419 Mass, at 375.

*Judgment affirmed.*
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE02980

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7341

FREDERICK LYNN SELLERS, 

Petitioner - Appellant, 

v. 

BRYAN K. DOBBS, Warden, 

Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Orangeburg. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (5:20-cv-01683-RBH) 

Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 23, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Frederick Lynn Sellers, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren L. Hummel, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, 

for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Frederick Lynn Sellers, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting 

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 

28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he sought to challenge his conviction by way of the 

savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Pursuant to § 2255(e), a prisoner may challenge his 

conviction in a traditional writ of habeas corpus pursuant to § 2241 if a § 2255 motion 

would be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention. 

[Section] 2255 is inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of a 

conviction when: (1) at the time of conviction, settled law of this circuit or 

the Supreme Court established the legality of the conviction; (2) subsequent 

to the prisoner’s direct appeal and first § 2255 motion, the substantive law 

changed such that the conduct of which the prisoner was convicted is deemed 

not to be criminal; and (3) the prisoner cannot satisfy the gatekeeping 

provisions of § 2255 because the new rule is not one of constitutional law. 

In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir. 2000). 

We have reviewed the record and, following the Supreme Court’s decision in 

Greer v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 2090 (2021), find no reversible error in the district 

court’s determination that Sellers failed to demonstrate that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is an 

inadequate or ineffective means of challenging his conviction. However, because the 

district court lacked jurisdiction over Sellers’ § 2241 petition, Rice v. Rivera, 617 F.3d 802, 

807-08 (4th Cir. 2010) (per curiam), we modify the court’s order to reflect that the 

dismissal of Sellers’ petition is without prejudice and affirm the order, Sellers v. Dobbs, 

No. 5:20-cv-01683-RBH (D.S.C. Sept. 7, 2021), as modified, see 28 U.S.C. § 2106; 

S. Walk at Broadlands Homeowner’s Ass’n, Inc. v. OpenBand at Broadlands, LLC, 

713 F.3d 175, 185 (4th Cir. 2013). We deny Sellers’ motion to appoint counsel and
3

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
ex10-6.htm


Exhibit 10.6


PROMISSORY NOTE













	
$1,200.00

	
March 31, 2010


	  	
Austin, Texas


	  	  










FOR VALUE, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Restaurant Concepts of America, a Nevada company referred to as (“Borrower”), promises to pay to David Cho (“Lender”), or order, at Austin, Texas, or as otherwise instructed, the principal sum of one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200.00) in lawful tender of the United States, together with simple interest thereon at an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%).







Terms of Repayment.  This Promissory Note shall become due and payable together will all accrued interest on March 31, 2011.







Default.  Any one or more of the following events shall constitute a Default under the terms of this Note:








	  	
1)

	
Borrower fail to make timely payment when due.


	  	  	  
	  	
2)

	
Borrower breaches an agreement or promise made to Lender, or fails to timely perform any obligation owing to Lender













	  	
3)

	
Borrower makes any representation or statement to Lender that is false or misleading in any material manner.


	  	  	  
	  	
4)

	
Borrower becomes insolvent, or a receiver is appointed for any part of all of Borrower’s property, of Borrower makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or any proceeding is brought either by Borrower of against Borrower under any Bankruptcy or insolvency laws.












In the event of any default as described herein, Lender, without further protest, presentment or notice, may declare all sums due and payable, together with any interest then due.







Waiver.  Forbearance of any payment due of modification of any term of this Note by Lender in any manner shall not be deemed nor construed as a waiver of any other rights in favor of Lender under the terms of this Notice.







Legal.  This Note shall be construed in accordance with the laws of that State of Texas, which shall be the choice of jurisdiction and venue for purposes of enforcement of this Note.  If any action is brought to enforce any provision or collect on this Note, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement for all reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.








	  	
Restaurant Concepts of America


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
By: /s/ David Cho                               


	  	
David Cho - President / CEO
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3938

To provide duty-free privileges to participants in, and other individuals

associated with, the 1994 World Rowing Championships.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1994

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide duty-free privileges to participants in, and other

individuals associated with, the 1994 World Rowing

Championships.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DUTY-FREE ENTRIES.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 is amended by inserting

5 in numerical sequence the following new heading:
2

•HR 3938 IH

‘‘ 9902.98.04 Personal effects of

aliens who are participants in, or officials of, the 1994

World Rowing

Championships,

who are accredited

members of delegations thereto, who

are members of the

immediate familes

of any of the foregoing persons, or

who are their servants; equipment for

use in connection

with such games,

and such other related articles as

may be prescribed

by the Secretary of

the Treasury ......... Free No change Free On or before

10/30/94 ’’.

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with

3 respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse

4 for consumption, on or after the fifteenth day after the

5 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 172/2006

of 31 January 2006         

fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on malt

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organization of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 15(2),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The corrective amount referred to in Article 15(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 which is applicable to export refunds fixed in advance in respect of malt shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 February 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 January 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

(3)OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1104/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 1).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 31 January 2006 fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on malt

NB: The product codes and the ‘                     A                     ’ series destination codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 (OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1) as amended.

The numeric destination codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11).

----
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 2214

In re: JAMES T. SMITH

,

Petitioner

.

On Petition s for Writ of Mandamus . ( 5:17

- cv

- 00051

- FPS

- JES )

Submitted : February 15, 2018 Decided: February 16, 2018

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Petition s denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

James T. Smith , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

James T. Smith petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has

unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition . He seeks an order from

this court directing the district court to act. We conclude that the present record does not

reveal undue d elay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny Smith’s petition and

s upplemental petition for mandamus relief . We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argume nt would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION S DENIED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.06 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Army Brig. Gen. Richard Dix, Byron Davis, DLA Meritorious Service Award, dla, People and Culture, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
##### 



Exhibit 31.5 Certification of Acting Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 I, David J. Reinke, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of First
Federal Capital Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: July 8, 2004
    
    /s/ David J. Reinke
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer