alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISA/JFHQ Meeting Request Submission Form

**Attach the completed form to an email and send to DISA/JFHQ Corporate Connections****disa.meade.bd.mbx.corp-connections@mail.mil**

**This form was developed using Microsoft Word for Office 365.  Please ensure a compatible application is used to complete the form.**

DISA/JFHQ Meeting Request Submission Form

**Attach the completed form to an email and send to DISA/JFHQ Corporate Connections****disa.meade.bd.mbx.corp-connections@mail.mil**

**This form was developed using Microsoft Word for Office 365.  Please ensure a compatible application is used to complete the form.**

****(CONTROL+CLICK TO GO TO TOP)

**** (CONTROL+CLICK TO GO TO TOP)

**** (CONTROL+CLICK TO GO TO TOP)

**** (CONTROL+CLICK TO GO TO TOP)

**Corporate Connections Data Collection Form– Jan. 2023**

****Page 1 of 2

**Corporate Connections Data Collection Form– Jan. 2023**

****Page 2 of 2

# image1.png
REGULATORY EVAU ATION

Directorate Identifier: 20 1O-NM~ 162-AD
Costs:Labor per airplane (4 work hours x $85/hour) Parts per airplane Cost per airplane Number ofU.S.-registered airplanes Total fleet cost $ 340 $ + --.!) $ 340


## , ---ll $7,140
Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? YES () explain NO (X) 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? YES () explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on asubstantial number of small entities? YES ()explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is itappropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated inAlaska, where aviation might bethe only mode of transportation? YES () explain NO (X)
VI 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 69 

For the relief of Anton Dodaj, Gjyljana Dodaj, Franc Dodaj, Kristjan Dodaj, 

and Kanto Macotaj. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2013 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Anton Dodaj, Gjyljana Dodaj, Franc Dodaj, 

Kristjan Dodaj, and Kanto Macotaj. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for the purposes of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Anton Dodaj, 

7 Gjyljana Dodaj, Franc Dodaj, Kristjan Dodaj, and Kanto 

8 Macotaj shall be deemed to have been lawfully admitted 

9 to, and remained in, the United States, and shall be eligi10 ble for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully 


smartinez on DSK6TPVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 69 IS

1 admitted for permanent residence under section 245 of the 

2 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) upon 

3 filing an application for such adjustment of status. 

4 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub5 section (a) shall apply only if the application for adjust6 ment of status is filed with appropriate fees not later than 

7 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

9 Upon the granting of permanent resident status to Anton 

10 Dodaj, Gjyljana Dodaj, Franc Dodaj, Kristjan Dodaj, or 

11 Kanto Macotaj, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 

12 proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current or next 

13 following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 

14 that are made available to natives of the country of the 

15 birth of Anton Dodaj, Gjyljana Dodaj, Franc Dodaj, 

16 Kristjan Dodaj, or Kanto Macotaj under section 202(a)(2) 

17 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

18 1152(a)(2)). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPVN1PROD with
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-80,041]

                    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated in response to a petition filed on March 15, 2011, on behalf of workers of Quad/Graphics, a Subdivision of Quad Graphics, Inc., Depew, New York. The negative                           ( print page 8288)                        determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 8, 2011 (76 FR 40402). The worker group includes on-site leased workers from SPS Temporaries.                

As required by the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) Extension Act of 2011 (the TAAEA), the investigation into this petition was reopened for a reconsideration investigation to apply the requirements for worker group eligibility under chapter 2 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the TAAEA, to the facts of this petition.

The worker group on whose behalf the petition was filed is covered under a certification (TA-W-73,441G) applicable to workers and former workers of Quad Graphics, Inc., a wholly-owned subdivision of Quad Graphics, Inc., including leased workers from SPS Temporaries, Depew, New York, who were totally or partially separated or threatened with such separation from February 9, 2009 through September 27, 2013. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 20th day of January, 2012.

Del Min Amy Chen,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2012-3326 Filed 2-13-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE ;P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ALLEN RAY JORDAN,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 10393

D.C. No. 2:96

- cr

- 00475

- GEB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 10, 2018 **

Before: CANBY, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Allen Ray Jordan appeals from th e district court’s order denying his motion

for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review discretionary denials of sentence reduction motions

for abuse of discretion

, see United States v. Ch aney , 581 F.3d 1123, 1125 (9th Cir.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 11 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 10393

2009), and we affirm.

Jordan argues that the district court erred by failing to consider adequately

his amended Guidelines range and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, and

by insufficiently explaining its decisi on. We disagree. The district court

acknowledged the reduced Guidelines range and Jordan’s eligibility for a

reduction. The court then discuss ed its reasons for denying the reduction in light

of the section 3553(a) factors. On this record, we conclude that the court properly

considered the section 3553(a) factors and adequately explained the sentence. See

Chavez

- Meza v. United States , 138 S. Ct. 1959 , 1965 (2018)

.

Jordan also contends that the denial of his motion was substantively

unreasonable in light of his post

- sentencing rehabilitation and other mitigating

factors. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. Jordan’s

360

- month sentence is not substantively un reasonable in light of the section

3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the

nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the

defendant. See United States v. Dunn , 728 F.3d 1151, 115 9 (9th Cir. 2013).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of First Rate Staffing Corporation (the "Company"),
hereby certify to my knowledge that:



The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015
of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



|/s/ Cliff Blake                          
|-----------------------------------------
|President and Principal executive officer
|Principal financial officer              



Date:
May 15, 2015
Exhibit 10.13

 

Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary

 

The compensation program for non-employee directors of Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) is summarized as follows:

 

Grant of Options Upon Appointment

 

Each new non-employee director receives an option to purchase 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock upon election or appointment to the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), with 1/3 of such option vesting on the first anniversary of the date of election or appointment and an additional 8 1/3% vesting at the end of every three-month period thereafter, subject to the director’s continued service to the Company.  Each such option is granted pursuant to, and subject to the terms of, the Company’s incentive award plan and a stock option award agreement in substantially the form of the Company’s standard stock option agreement approved by the Board.

 

Grant of Additional Stock Options

 

Each non-employee director who served as a director in the previous year receives an option to purchase 17,750 shares of the Company’s common stock on the date of each annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders, such option vests in full on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to the director’s continued service to the Company.  Each such option is granted pursuant to, and subject to the terms of, the Company’s incentive award plan and a stock option award agreement in substantially the form of the Company’s standard stock option agreement approved by the Board.

 

Payment of Retainer Fee; Reimbursement of Travel and Other Expenses

 

Each non-employee director is entitled to receive an annual retainer for his or her service on the Board as well as additional fees for committee service as follows:

 

	
Position
    	
 
    	
Fees
    
	
Annual Retainer
    	
 
    	
$40,000
    
	
Non-Employee Chairman of the Board
    	
 
    	
$30,000
    
	
Audit Committee Chair
    	
 
    	
$20,000
    
	
Audit Committee Members (other than the Chair)
    	
 
    	
$10,000
    
	
Compensation Committee Chair
    	
 
    	
$15,000
    
	
Compensation Committee Members (other than the   Chair)
    	
 
    	
$7,500
    
	
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair
    	
 
    	
$12,000
    
	
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee   Members (other than the Chair)
    	
 
    	
$6,000
    
	
Science Committee Chair
    	
 
    	
$10,000
    
	
Science Committee Members
    	
 
    	
$7,500
    
	
Additional Payments to Science Committee Chair and   Members
    	
 
    	
$3,000 for each all day session attended (up to a   maximum of $15,000 per year) that is in addition to the standard quarterly   meetings of the Scientific Committee
    


 

All retainer amounts are paid quarterly in arrears during the fiscal year. Non-employee directors also receive reimbursement for reasonable travel and other expenses in connection with attending Board meetings.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

of Periodic Report
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

I, Seth Taube, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sierra Income Corporation (the Company);

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The Companys other certifying officer(s)
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the Company and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The Companys other
certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 4, 2015



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Seth Taube               
|Seth Taube                   
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
Catalyst Paper (Snowflake) Inc. 

Spur 277 North 

P.O. Box 128 

Snowflake, AZ 85937 

Tel: 928 536 4314 

Fax: 928 536 9436 

December 21, 2012 

Mr. Eric Massey 

Director, Air Quality Division 

Arizona Department of 

Environmental Quality 

1110 West Washington Street 

Phoenix, AZ 85007 

Re: Catalyst Paper (Snowflake) Inc 

Facility Closure 

Title V Permit No. 46898 Termination 

Dear Mr. Massey: 

This notification is to inform you of Catalyst’s intention to terminate the Title V Operating Permit. 

The Snowflake Mill ceased production on September 30th 2012 and has permanently closed. 

As the Mill has closed and the boilers were shut down permanently there is no need for the 

permit. The new owners of the Snowflake site will not be operating the boilers. 

Please contact Fred Mollenhauer, Senior Environmental Engineer, at 928-536-9462, FAX 928-

536-9469, or email at Fred.Mollenhauer@CatalystPaper.com if you have any questions 

concerning this notification. 

Very Truly Yours, 

John Groothuizen 

Site Manager 

cc: Director, Region IX, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

B. Vaidyanathan - ADEQ 

Fred Mollenhauer

Env. File
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 11-1663

FISHMAN TRANSDUCERS, INC.,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

STEPHEN PAUL, d/b/a Esteban; DAYSTAR PRODUCTIONS;

HSN INTERACTIVE LLC,

Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees.

__________

FORCE USA, INC.; FORCE, LTD.,

Third-Party Defendants.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on July 3, 2012, should be

amended as follows.

On page 6, line 6 of 1st paragraph, replace "(section 1125@)"

with "(section 1125(c))".
EXHIBIT 21


Name of Subsidiary                                Jurisdiction of Incorporation

HomeClub, Inc.                                              Nevada
HomeClub, Inc. of Texas                                     Delaware
Fullerton Corporation                                       Delaware
HCI Development Corp.                                       California
HomeClub First Realty Corp.                                 Colorado
HCWA Realty Corp.                                           Washington
HCCA Realty Corp.                                           California
HBNM Realty Corp.                                           New Mexico
HBCA 1993 Realty Corp.                                      California
HBOR Realty Corp.                                           Oregon
HBUT Realty Corp.                                           Utah
HCWA 1993 Realty Corp.                                      Washington
HBCO Realty Corp.                                           Colorado
HBNM 1994 Realty Corp. New Mexico                           New Mexico
HBCO 1994 Realty Corp.                                      Colorado
HBCA Pomona Realty Corp.                                    California
HBCA Vacaville Realty Corp.                                 California
HBI Holdings                                                Nevada
Exhibit 32

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549



|RE: | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.



/s/ Michael J. UlrichMichael J. Ulrich Vice
President The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust


December 22, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 36 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 36

  Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
   award the Congressional Gold Medal to the next of kin or personal 
                  representative of Raoul Wallenberg.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2014

 Mrs. Gillibrand submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
   award the Congressional Gold Medal to the next of kin or personal 
                  representative of Raoul Wallenberg.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY TO AWARD CONGRESSIONAL GOLD 
              MEDAL TO THE NEXT OF KIN OR PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF 
              RAOUL WALLENBERG.

    (a) In General.--The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be 
used on July 9, 2014, for a ceremony to award the Congressional Gold 
Medal to the next of kin or personal representative of Raoul Wallenberg 
in recognition of his achievements and heroic actions during the 
Holocaust.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the ceremony described 
in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance with such 
conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
                                 <all>
```