alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.14 MB)

Tags:Snowcat

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
|     |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Deloitte & Touche
Hardwicke House Hatch Street
Dublin 2 Tel: +353 (1) 417 2800
Fax: ++353 (1) 417 2900 Chartered Accountants
 www.deloitte.com/ie

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement on Form 20-F of our reports dated 4 March 2014, relating to (1) the 2013 financial
statements and the retrospective adjustments to the 2012 and 2011 financial statements of Allied Irish Banks, p.l.c. and (2) the effectiveness of Allied Irish Banks, p.l.c.s internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2013
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Allied Irish Banks, p.l.c. for the year ended 31 December 2013.



LOGO

Deloitte & Touche,

Independent Registered Chartered Accountants and Statutory Audit Firm

Hardwicke House,

Hatch Street,

Dublin 2.

25 April 2014



LOGO
EXHIBIT 12.1

Section 302 Certification

I, Bill Baird, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Twin Mining Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 30, 2007

| |                                               
| | ----------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Bill Baird                                
| | Bill Baird
    Interim Chief Executive Officer
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL 

Shelby County 

Health Department 

PERMIT TO OPERATE 

TITLE V ... MAJOR SOURCE 

PERMITNUMBE:k: 

CARGILL, INC. 

2330 Buoy Street 

Memphis, Tennessee 38113 

INITIALISSUANCE DATE: July 16,2001 

EXPIRATION DATE: November 20,2019 

RENEWAL DATE: November 20,2014 

A permit condition maybe appealed by filing a petition for reconsideration within thirty (30) days 

after the mailing date ofthe permit. 

This permit may be subject to revocation, suspension, modification or amendment by the 

Technical Secretary for cause including the evidence of non-compliance witlt any of.the above, or for 

any misrepresentation made in the application(s), supporting data entered therein or llttached thereto, 

or any subsequent submittal or supporting data, or for any alterations affecting the emissions from 

this source.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-50485

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Carlos Enrique Navarro-Trevino, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:23-CR-105-1

______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Carlos Enrique Navarro-Trevino appeals following his conviction for 

illegally reentering the United States after removal. He argues that the 

statutory sentencing enhancement in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional. 

Navarro-Trevino has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition,

correctly conceding that the only issue he raises is foreclosed by Almendarez-

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 15, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50485 Document: 00517065028 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2024
No. 23-50485

2

Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis, 937 

F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019). He explains that he has raised the issue to 

preserve it for possible further review. 

Accordingly, because summary disposition is appropriate, see 

Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969),

Navarro-Trevino’s motion is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment 

is AFFIRMED.

Case: 23-50485 Document: 00517065028 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/15/2024
Exhibit 32.1


November 10, 2016


Via EDGAR


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F. Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





Re:Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Ladies and Gentlemen:


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Trust.

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.





The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.Trustee for Chesapeake Granite Wash TrustBy:/s/ Sarah C. NewellSarah C. NewellVice President
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 60118 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. DONALD LEE HATHORN , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 2:09

- CR

- 25

- 1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Donald Lee Hathorn, federal prisoner # 10194

- 043, pleaded guilty to one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute and was sentenced to 106 months of imprisonment. Hath orn moved for a reduction of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) based on the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. The distr ict court granted the motion and reduced his sentence to 89 months

. After an untimely appeal, Hathorn moved the district court to

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 9, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-60118 Document: 00512495746 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/10/2014No. 13

- 60118

correct a clerical error under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36

. Hathorn asserted that the amended presentence report incorrectly calculated his new guidelines range and that the district court failed to take the correct range into account in red ucing his sentence under § 3582. The district court denied the motion as being without merit and untimely. The district court denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal and certified that the appeal was not taken in good faith. Rule 36 provides that the district court “ may at any time correct a clerical error in a judgment, order, or other part of the record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight or omission .” F ED

. R. C RIM

. P . 36

. A clerical error occurs when the cou rt intends to do one thing, but through clerical mistake or oversight does another. United States v. Buendia

- Rangel , 553 F.3d 378, 379 ( 5th Cir. 2008) . The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hathorn ’s Rule 36 motion. Se e United State s v. Mueller , 168 F.3d 186, 188 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we deny Hathorn’s motion for leave to appeal IFP, and we dismiss the appeal as frivolous. Ba ugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997); Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) ; 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2

. MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

2 Case: 13-60118 Document: 00512495746 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/10/2014
EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Fisher, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enova International, Inc.; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: June 13, 2016

 

| /s/ David A. Fisher              |
|---------------------------------------|
| David A. Fisher                       |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 15-0884

Filed June 29, 2016

HAJRUDIN PURIC a/k/a RUDY PURIC,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

vs. 

SAMIR DURATOVIC, COCO

TRANSPORTATION, LLC, and 

C & A TRANSPORT, LLC, 

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------------------------------------

ARJANA ROSIC, and 

C & A TRANSPORT, LLC, 

Counterclaim Plaintiffs,

vs. 

HAJRUDIN PURIC, 

Counterclaim Defendant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, David F.

Staudt, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the district court’s denial of his conversion and contract 

claims and the district court’s award of damages to defendants on their 

counterclaim. AFFIRMED.

Erin Patrick Lyons of Dutton, Braun, Staack & Hellman, P.L.C., Waterloo, 

for appellant.

Michael H. Bandy of Bandy Law Office, Waterloo, for appellees.

Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Doyle and Mullins, JJ.
2

MULLINS, Judge.

Hajrudin Puric sued Samir Duratovic, CCO Transportation, LLC, and C & 

A Transport, LLC, alleging several theories of recovery arising out of 

misunderstandings concerning certain loans, a motor vehicle title, and the 

transfer of that title. Arjana Rosic and C & A Transport, LLC sued Puric for 

moneys they claimed were owed for repairs to the motor vehicle.1 After the 

cases were consolidated and heard by the district court, it issued a thorough 

written ruling. Puric has appealed, alleging the court erred in denying his 

conversion and breach-of-contract claims and in granting relief to defendants on 

what is referenced as a counterclaim.

Apart from a lease agreement, which provided terms pertaining to Puric’s 

role as an independent contractor with defendants, the alleged contracts by and 

between the parties were all oral agreements. Puric signed the title assigning it 

to defendants. Although some documents exist with regard to damage claims, 

the agreements or misunderstandings concerning the agreements were mostly

oral. The district court considered all the evidence and made numerous 

credibility findings that bore directly on determining what was agreed by the 

parties and what was not. It likewise made numerous credibility findings in 

reaching conclusions as to what agreements were breached and what were not.

On our review of the briefs, the record, and the district court’s ruling and

giving appropriate deference to that court’s credibility findings, we agree with the 

 

1 For ease of reference, all parties other than Puric will be collectively identified as 

defendants.
3

factual findings of that court and determine based on those findings it made no 

errors at law and its ruling is supported by substantial evidence.

We affirm by memorandum opinion. Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(b), (d).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) PROMULGATED UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Milagro Oil & Gas, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Robert D. LaRocque

Robert D. LaRocqueVice President of Finance & Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Cytyc Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick J. Sullivan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that, to my knowledge on the date
hereof:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                                          
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: March 1, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Patrick J. Sullivan                                  
|                    |  |  |  | Patrick J. Sullivan Chief Executive Officer and President



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as our exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of
the Form 10-K.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Beachwood Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President, Director,
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: August 19, 2011