alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6537

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY EDWARD ZELLNER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Vi rginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-99-164-2) Submitted: August 26, 2005 Decided: October 19, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Edward Zellner, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Anthony Edward Zellner seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider judgment and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to reconsider. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). The denial of a post-judgment motion in a habeas proceeding is a final order that requires a certificate of appealability. See Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Zellner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions- 3 - are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IIA 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 42 

To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against the Islamic 

State in Iraq and the Levant. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 

Mr. NELSON introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against 

the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This joint resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Authoriza5 tion for Use of Military Force against the Islamic State 

6 in Iraq and the Levant’’. 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 42 IS 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES 

2 ARMED FORCES AGAINST THE ISLAMIC 

3 STATE IN IRAQ AND THE LEVANT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—That the President is authorized 

5 to use appropriate force against the Islamic State in Iraq 

6 and the Levant (ISIL) in order to prevent terrorist attacks 

7 on the people and interests of the United States and our 

8 allies. 

9 (b) NO AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF ROTATIONAL

10 GROUND FORCES.—The authorization in this section does 

11 not include authorization for the use of rotational ground 

12 forces. 

13 (c) EXPIRATION.—The authorization in this section 

14 shall expire on the date that is three years after the date 

15 of the enactment of this joint resolution. 

16 (d) WAR POWERS RESOLUTION REQUIREMENTS.— 

17 (1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION.— 

18 Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers 

19 Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is 

20 intended to constitute specific statutory authoriza21 tion within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War 

22 Powers Resolution. 

23 (2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIRE24 MENTS.—Nothing in this resolution supercedes any 

25 requirement of the War Powers Resolution. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 949 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to improve upon the definitions provided 

for points and fees in connection with a mortgage transaction. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2013 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself and Mr. JOHANNS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to improve upon the 

definitions provided for points and fees in connection 

with a mortgage transaction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consumer Mortgage 

5 Choice Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF POINTS AND FEES. 

7 (a) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 103 OF TILA.—Sec8 tion 103(bb)(4) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 1602(bb)(4)) is amended— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 949 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(B)’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘paragraph (1)(A) and section 129C’’; 

3 (2) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘(B) all compensation paid directly by a 

6 consumer to a mortgage originator, including a 

7 mortgage originator that is also the creditor in 

8 a table-funded transaction, but not including 

9 compensation paid by a mortgage originator or 

10 a creditor to an individual employed by the 

11 mortgage originator or creditor;’’; 

12 (3) in subparagraph (C)— 

13 (A) by inserting ‘‘and insurance’’ after 

14 ‘‘taxes’’; 

15 (B) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘, except as 

16 retained by a creditor or its affiliate as a result 

17 of their participation in an affiliated business 

18 arrangement (as defined in section 2(7) of the 

19 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 

20 (12 U.S.C. 2602(7))’’ after ‘‘compensation’’; 

21 and 

22 (C) by striking clause (iii) and inserting 

23 the following: 

24 ‘‘(iii) the charge is— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 949 IS

1 ‘‘(I) a bona fide third-party 

2 charge not retained by the mortgage 

3 originator, creditor, or an affiliate of 

4 the creditor or mortgage originator; or 

5 ‘‘(II) a charge set forth in section 

6 106(e)(1);’’; and 

7 (4) in subparagraph (D)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘accident,’’; and 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘or any payments’’ and in10 serting ‘‘and any payments’’. 

11 (b) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 129C OF TILA.—Sec12 tion 129C of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1639c) 

13 is amended— 

14 (1) in subsection (a)(5)(C), by striking ‘‘103’’ 

15 and all that follows through ‘‘or mortgage origi16 nator’’ and inserting ‘‘103(bb)(4)’’; and 

17 (2) in subsection (b)(2)(C)(i), by striking ‘‘103’’ 

18 and all that follows through ‘‘or mortgage origi19 nator)’’ and inserting ‘‘103(bb)(4)’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-20-00561-CV

Enrique LOPEZ, Individually, and as Representative of the Estate of Tristan Lopez, Deceased,

Appellant

v.

GUIDING LIGHT, LLC,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI21729

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order Granting 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice and Motion to Award Attorneys’ Fees & Costs is 

AFFIRMED. Costs of appeal are assessed against appellant.

SIGNED December 1, 2021.

_____________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Haley, Millette and Senior Judge Coleman 

JOSEPH W. COBB 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0393-08-1 PER CURIAM 

JUNE 24, 2008 

DANNY NOCO CORPREW, SR. AND 

 UNINSURED EMPLOYER’S FUND 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (James P. Magner; Rutter Mills, L.L.P., on brief), for appellant. 

 No brief for appellee Danny Noco Corprew, Sr. 

 (Gerard E.W. Voyer; Natalie P. Mann; Taylor & Walker, P.C., on 

brief), for appellee Uninsured Employer’s Fund. 

 Joseph W. Cobb appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding 

that Danny Noco Corprew, Sr. was not subject to the jurisdiction of the Workers’ Compensation 

Act. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is 

without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final 

opinion. See Cobb v. Corprew, VWC File No. 231-32-50 (Jan. 15, 2008). We dispense with 

oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
#### RICHARDSON v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO. et al.

No. 9357.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Jan. 29, 1940.

John H. Benckenstein and H. C. Keen, both of Beaumont, Tex., for appellant.

Charles A. McCoy and Alvin O. King, both of Lake Charles, La., and Sumter D. Marks, Jr., of New Orleans, La., for appel-lees.

Before SIBLEY, HUTCHESON, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On further consideration of the motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal we are of opinion that there is no such apparent merit in the appeal as for us to waive the rule of the Court requiring printing of the record.

The motion to dismiss is sustained.
Exhibit 41151


		
			Exhibit 14.1.15.1
		

		
			SCHEDULE OF SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURES SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTICAL TO FORM OF SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE DURING AND AFTER 2014
		

		
			In accordance with Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant has omitted filing the following Supplemental Indentures by and between Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. and The Bank  of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. because they are substantially identical in all material respects to the form of Supplemental Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1.15 to Aqua America, Inc.’s  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015:
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			Forty-ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 1, 2014




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			Fiftieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 1, 2015
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SafeNet, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony A.
Caputo, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and
for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                                                                              | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Anthony A. CaputoAnthony A. Caputo
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2003 |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND DECEMBER 31,1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         494,781
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,091,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (51,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,045,195
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,664,920
<PP&E>                                       1,405,073
<DEPRECIATION>                               (421,971)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,371,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,851,796
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        380
<COMMON>                                         3,936
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,760,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,371,038
<SALES>                                      5,705,313
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,705,313
<CGS>                                      (3,040,919)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (4,422,835)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                98,977
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,645,039)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    53,427
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,598,008)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,598,008)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.51)

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 (the “Report”) of VII Peaks Co-Optivist
Income BDC II, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Gurpreet S. Chandhoke, the Chief Executive Officer and President, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                       | By: | /s/ Gurpreet S. Chandhoke                                                                            
|-------------------------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                       |     | Gurpreet S. Chandhoke                                                                                
|Dated this 16th day of November, 2015. |     | Chairman of the Board of Directors,Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.86 MB)

Tags:Loglines, Rapid Deployment Teams, july 2017

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.3




<PAGE>

                           Grupo Elektra, S.A. de C.V.

                              List of Subsidiaries

Elektrafin Comercial, S.A. de C.V.
Salinas y Rocha, S.A. de C.V.
Elektra Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.
Comercios Elektra, S.A. de C.V.
Entrega Especializada, S.A. de C.V.
Almacenes Especializados, S.A. de C.V.
Direccion Especial, S.A. de C.V.
Electronica del Moral, S.A. de C.V.
Inmuebeles Selectos, S.A. de C.V.
Mi Garantia Extendida, S.A. de C.V.
Importaciones Electronicas Ribesa, S.A. de C.V.
Inmuebles Ardoma, S.A. de C.V.
Compania Operadora de Teatros, S.A. de C.V.
Siglo XXI, S.A. de C.V.
Direccion de Administracion Central, S.A. de C.V.
Grupo Proasa, S.A. de C.V.
Grupo Mercantil Finemsa, S.A. de C.V.
Elmex Superior, S.A. de C.V.
Mercadotecnia Tezontle, S.A. de C.V.
Aerotraxis Metropolitanos, S.A. de C.V.
Sistemas de Mision Estrategica, S.A. de C.V.
Administrativos Empresariales, S.A. de C.V.
Inmobiliaria Hecali, S.A. de C.V.
THE ONE, S.A. de C.V.
The One Internet, S.A. de C.V.
Operadora SYR, S.A. de C.V.
Colchones, S.A.
Intra Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.
Elektra Transfer, S.A. de C.V.
Mercantil Agricola, S.A. de C.V.
Datacion y Supervision de Personal, S.A. de C.V.
Importadora y Exportadora Elektra de El Salvador, S.A. de C.V.
Comercializadora Elektra, S.A. de C.V.
Elektra

<PAGE>

Elektra del Peru, S.A.
Inmuebles Elektra, S.A. de C.V.
Elektra Centroamerica, S.A. de C.V.
Inmobiliaria Liur, S.A. de C.V.
Colchones Coloso, S.A. de C.V.
Direccion Sistematica Empresarial, S.A. de C.V.
Operadoras en Servicios Comerciales, S.A. de C.V.
Control y Direccion Administrativa, S.A. de C.V.
Direccion de Admimistracion en Proyectos Aplicados, S.A. de C.V.
Direccion de Admimistracion en Proyectos Especiales, S.A. de C.V.
Mediciones y Representaciones Comerciales, S.A. de C.V.
Gerencia Administrativas Operacionales, S.A. de C.V.
Bienes Raices en Promocion del Centro, S.A. de C.V.
Multinational Customer Services LLC
Investment Partners III, LLC
Cappello Investment Partners IV, LLC
Cappello Investment Partners V, LLC
martireempagramdexhibit1







1         Exhibit 10.29   AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT      This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is   effective as of February 23, 2016 (the "Effective Date"), by and between FIDELITY   NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., a Georgia corporation ("FIS" or the   "Company"), and Frank R. Martire (the "Employee") and amends that certain Amended and   Restated Employment Agreement dated March 31, 2009, as previously amended on December 1,   2009, March 30, 2012 and January 1, 2015 (as previously amended, the "Agreement").  Unless   expressly amended herein, the terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.  In   consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, the parties agree as   follows:   1. Section 9(a)(iv) is deleted and the following is inserted in lieu thereof:   “(iv) (iv) All stock option, restricted stock and other equity-based incentive   awards granted by the Company (or granted by an affiliate of the Company prior to   the Effective Time and assumed by the Company) that were outstanding but not   vested as of the Date of Termination shall, subject to Section 9(e), become   immediately vested and/or payable, as the case may be, and the Employee’s Prior   Equity Awards that are stock options shall be exercisable for the lesser of (x) the   remaining term of such stock options and (y) five (5) years after the Date of   Termination; and;”      IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Amendment to be effective as   of the date first set forth above.       FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION   SERVICES, INC.         By:  ___________//S//_______________   Its:  CEVP, Chief Administrative Officer           FRANK R. MARTIRE      _______________//S//_______________
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1070

CHERYL ANNE BATTLES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

EMILY ELIZABETH MCCANN,

Plaintiff,

versus

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; ANNE

ARUNDEL COUNTY, Superintendent; ANNE ARUNDEL

COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge.

(CA-95-508-Y)

Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Cheryl Anne Battles, Appellant Pro Se. B. Darren Burns, ANNE

ARUNDEL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Annapolis, Maryland; Shelly Eilene

Mintz, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on her civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Battles v.

Anne Arundel County Board of Education, No. CA-95-508-Y (D. Md.

Nov. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED