alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Regulatory Evaluation
Docket No. FAA- 

# ?-01 4- 

# rt-oo,.. "AD Directorate Identifier: -AD ((nm make dtwtges lo tlte values in t!te tahl e hdmr. youtuu. \1 eusttr<! tlte lotal s updalt' ttcct w dingly. (f ilt<T tlo tw l, 

### dic k fu r lit h) 

### in/0 wtt! then our 

### t?lllw 

### dumged cell. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, (e.g
.. In spection. propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost To tal Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (incl ude cost (labor+ 

## u.s. for U .S. Fleet Do nat include 011 - condition costs h ere access , testing. (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

### SB 4131 Inspection 12.0 

### 12 Repl acement 96.0 

### 12 LH LE Outbrd Cell

**~2.5 45**  

### 12 RH LE Outbrd Cell 

### $2.545 12 LH 

## LE lnb rd Cell 

### $1.877 12 

## RH L E Inbrd Cell 

### $2,994 

### 12 

## LH Center Cell 

### $4,210 12 RH Center Cell 

### $2,18 8 12 Add 'l 

### 17 spares 16 .0 

### $4.210 17 Clamps Max 

### $28 12 Gaskets Max 

### $110 12 Gask e t/clamp s pare 

### $54 17 SB 28-4127 Part 1 Inspection* 30.0 

### 12 Install/Replace 10 .0 

### 12 Tube Assembly 

### $286 12 Flex Hose, Clamps 

### $368 12 SB 28-4127Part 2 4.0 

### 12 Logbook Rev iew 

### 0. 5 

## so 3,279 The known number of products in complia nce: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $595.818 Costs covered under warranty
_ (if known) 

# s On

- Condition Costs: 

# U Action Wo r k-h ours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g., Inspec tion, (include access, ( @$85/hour) testing
. and close- replacement) up)



### 8

# * Inspection time maybe reduced due to work completed during SB 28

- 4131

Special considerations for E c onomic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Cost s table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs ) : 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a '"significant regulatory action''? 

# G YES* 

# 0 NO(g] *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is 

### the AD significant? 

# G YES* 

# 0 NO(g] *Explanation: 

### Rcgulator·y Flexibility Act: Will the 

### AD have a significant economic impact on 

### a substantial number 

### of small entities? Ex plain for either a Yes or No an swer . 

# G YES 

# 0 NO(g] Explanation : 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska : This 

### AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska
. 

### Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviat ion might 

### be the on l y mode of transportation? 

# G YES* 

# D N0[8] *Explanation:



### 9
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 20284 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ODILON PEREZ GARCIA , also known as Odilon Perez

- Garcia, al so known as Odilon Garcia Perez,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appea l s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CR

- 8

- 1

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Odilon Perez Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez Garcia filed a letter requesting more time to file a response to the Anders brief, and he was given more time

. However, he never

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 16, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-20284 Document: 00512598983 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014No. 13

- 20284

filed a supplemental brief. We have reviewed counsel’s brief , the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , and the points raised in Perez Garcia’s
initial letter . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issu e for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-20284 Document: 00512598983 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William Goebel, the
chief financial officer of FS Investment Corporation II (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 14, 2012/s/ William GoebelWilliam GoebelChief Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.57 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, financial stewardship, Process excellence, Senior NCO of the Quarter, People and Culture, diversity

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1

May 15, 2012

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F. Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549



|Re: | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Trust.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
Trustee for Chesapeake Granite Wash TrustBy:

/s/ Michael UlrichMichael J. Ulrich
Vice President and Trust Officer
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0603 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2009-SW-079-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### MILLER v. CLARK (two cases).

Nos. 7344, 7345.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided Jan. 29, 1940.

Samuel W. McCart, of Washington, D. G, for appellant.

Chas. S. Baker, Benj. L. Tepper, and Warren E. Magee, all of Washington, D. G, for appellees.

Before STEPHENS; EDGERTON, and RUTLEDGE, Associate Justices.

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

Appellees recovered judgments against appellant in actions for personal injuries to appellee Pansy A. Clark caused by collision with appellant’s truck. The question is whether the trial court should have granted appellant’s motions to direct verdicts in his favor, and to set aside verdicts in appellees’ favor, on the ground that the evidence showed contributory negligence on the part of Mrs. Clark. Appellant’s negligence is not disputed on this appeal.

Mrs. Clark’s testimony was that she walked slowly south on the west sidewalk of Nichols Avenue, S. E., to the north curb of Chicago Street, stopped at this curb, looked back up Nichols Avenue to see if any car was turning from Nichols Avenue into Chicago Street, looked west on Chicago Street, saw her way clear, and then “made one step down and another step forward, when this truck come very quick and I tried to push myself, and I fell back; and, as I fell back I was unconscious.” She lived in the neighborhood, and had been told that the crossing was dangerous. Her statement that she stopped, looked up Nichols Avenue and then up Chicago Street was corroborated by several eyewitnesses. Defendant’s truck approached the intersection from the same direction as Mrs. Clark, i. e., from the north, on Nichols Avenue. It turned into Chicago Street. A witness testified that it was traveling about 25 miles per hour as it approached the corner, that it turned without slowing down, that the front of the truck passed Mrs. Clark but the rear ran nearer to the curb than the front, and that the right rear fender of the truck struck her “just as she stepped off.” One witness placed the truck about 40 feet north of the intersection when Mrs. Clark reached the curb. Appellant did not sound his horn, or in any way signal a right turn.

The evidence supports, if it does not require, the inference that appellee was free from contributory negligence. It is possible that, notwithstanding appellant’s negligence, the greatest of care on appellee’s *678part might have prevented the accident; but she was, of course, required to use only reasonable care. She was not necessarily careless in entering the crosswalk after looking both ways, or in looking up Nichols Avenue first and then up Chicago Street; and reasonable care did not necessarily require her, before or after entering the crosswalk, to look again up Nichols Avenue on the chance that-a negligent driver might approach swiftly and without warning from around the corner. It follows that appellant’s motions were properly overruled.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Mike Ulrich, is an authorized officer of The Bank of New York Mellon Trust
Company, N.A., the trustee of BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (the registrant).

This statement is being furnished in
connection with the filing by the registrant of the registrants annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | (A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant as of the dates
and for the periods covered by the Report.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 1, 2013



By:

/s/ Mike UlrichMike Ulrich Vice
President
Exhibit 32.1

Station Casinos LLC

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as follows:



|1. | Soohyung Kim is the Chief Executive Officer of ALST Casino Holdco, LLC (the Company).
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The undersigned certifies to the best of his knowledge:
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------



| | (A) | The Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: December 15, 2011



/s/ SOOHYUNG KIMSoohyung KimManager, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
EX-10.27



 IMAX CORPORATION 

EXHIBIT 10.27 
 FIRST
AMENDING AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of May 14th, 2009 (the “Amending Agreement”) is made between: 

IMAX CORPORATION, a corporation incorporated under the laws of Canada (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”), 

and 
 JOESPH SPARACIO, of the Town of Holmdel in the
State of New Jersey 
 (the “Executive”), 

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to enter into this Amending Agreement to amend and extend the Employment Agreement dated as of May 14, 2007 between
the Company and Executive (together, the “Agreement”), whereunder the Executive provides services to the Company, and the Executive wishes to so continue such engagement, as on the same terms and conditions as set out thereunder. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows: 
 1. Section 1.3 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with the following: 

“Section 1.3 Term of Employment. The Executive’s employment under this Agreement commenced on the 14th day of May, 2007 (the
“Commencement Date”) and shall terminate on the earlier of (i) May 14, 2010, or (ii) the termination of the Executive’s employment pursuant to this Agreement. The period commencing as of the Commencement Date and ending
on May 13, 2010 or such later date to which the term of the Executive’s employment under this Agreement shall have been extended is hereinafter referred to as the “Employment Term. The Company shall notify the Executive at least six
(6) months prior to the anniversary of this Amending agreement of its intentions with respect to renewing the Agreement. 
 Except as amended herein,
all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force, unamended. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have duly executed and
delivered this mending Agreement on this 14th day of May, 2009. 
  

			
	IMAX CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert D. Lister

	Name:	 	Robert D. Lister
	Title:	 	Senior Exec VP & General Counsel
		
	By:	 	 /s/ G. Mary Ruby

	Name:	 	G. Mary Ruby
	Title:	 	Exec VP, Corporate Services
		 	& Corporate Secretary


  

					
	SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED	 		 	EXECUTIVE:
	in the presence of:	 		 	
			
	 /s/ Tamara R. Steele
	 		 	 /s/ Joe Sparacio

	Witness	 		 	Joe Sparacio
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 32005R1797

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1797/2005 of 28 October 2005 amending for the 56th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001***Official Journal L 288 , 29/10/2005 P. 0044 - 0045*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1797/2005

of 28 October 2005

amending for the 56th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001 prohibiting the export of certain goods and services to Afghanistan, strengthening the flight ban and extending the freeze of funds and other financial resources in respect of the Taliban of Afghanistan [1], and in particular Article 7(1), first indent, thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

(2) On 24 October 2005, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one individual from the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. Annex I should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2005.

For the Commission

Eneko Landáburu

Director-General of External Relations

[1] OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1690/2005 (OJ L 271, 15.10.2005, p. 31).

--------------------------------------------------

ANNEX

The following entry under the heading "Natural persons" shall be removed from Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002:

"Rahmatullah Safi. Title: General. Date of birth: (a) Circa 1948, (b) 21.3.1913. Place of birth: Tagaab district, Kapisa, province, Afghanistan. Other information: Taliban representative in Europe."

--------------------------------------------------