AAM-10-231-E May 5, 2010 Exemption No. 10059 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0396

Mr. Jeff Veers Designated Employee Representative Duffy’s Aircraft Sales and Leasing (also d.b.a. Aviation on Demand, LLC)

400 West 29 th Street Marshfield, WI 54449

Dear Mr. Veers:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 1, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Duffy’s Aircraft Sales and Leasing (also d.b.a Aviation on Demand, LLC) (Duffy’s Aircraft Sales and Leasing) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Duffy’s Aircraft Sales andLeasing, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Duffy’s Aircraft Sales and Leasing.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that2

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant of exemption;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Duffy’s Aircraft Sales and Leasing d.b.a Aviation on Demand, LLC an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Duffy’s Aircraft Sales and Leasing, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the conditions and

limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Duffy’s Aircraft Sales and L easing are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Duffy’s Aircraft Sale s and Leasing part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure