alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 Written Certification of Chief Financial Officer
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ PETER WHITFIELD

Peter Whitfield
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.79 MB)

Tags:AbilityOne, dla, Defense Logisitcs Agency, Scott Owens, land and maritime

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence Group, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen R. Head, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Secretary and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





­/s/ Stephen R. Head
 Stephen R. Head
 Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration,
 Secretary and Treasurer
 (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
 June 22, 2012
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Pagan, Appellant.

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered April 21, 1989, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of from three to nine years incarceration, unanimously affirmed.

On September 23, 1988, defendant pleaded guilty to a violation of probation for possession of heroin, and was "restored to probation” pending sentencing on November 18, 1988. A presentence report, which recommended incarceration due to defendant’s failure to attend a drug rehabilitation program, was prepared for November 18, but defendant failed to appear, and was eventually returned on a warrant on April 21, 1989. At that time, the court revoked probation and sentenced defendant as noted above.

We reject defendant’s argument that new charges and a new hearing were required prior to revoking defendant’s probation. The argument is predicated on the assumption that when the court restored defendant to probation on September 23, it was, in fact, pronouncing sentence. In context, and given the fact that a date was set for sentencing, we think it clear that the court simply meant that defendant was to remain at liberty pending sentence.

*234Nor, under the circumstances presented, was it error for the court to sentence defendant without ordering a presentence report detailing his activities during the five-month period in which he was an absconder. *(Cf, People v Gordon,*155 AD2d 225.) The presentence report prepared for the November 18, 1988 sentencing date was sufficient.

We have examined defendant’s other argument and find it to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Asch and Smith, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0088 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LEWIS LEON BRYSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 10 2022

08/10/2022
Case Number: DA 22-0088
Exhibit 32.1




Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of WRASP 33, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard A. RappaportRichard A. RappaportPrincipal Executive OfficerMay 11, 2011
## INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS CONSENT

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-16903 and 333-56585
of New Horizons Worldwide, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 11, 2003
(our report on the consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualified
opinion and explanatory paragraph referring to a change in method of accounting
for goodwill and other intangible assets in 2002), appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of New Horizons Worldwide, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Costa Mesa, California
March 28, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                         Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                                     2,285
<SECURITIES>                                             133,936
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         136,408
<PP&E>                                                   833,054
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         1,005,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    103,152
<BONDS>                                                  516,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     90,701
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                      92
<OTHER-SE>                                                67,845
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           1,005,944
<SALES>                                                      937
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             937
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              8,822
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        39,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (29,763)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (29,763)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (29,763)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (47)
                                              


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         101,678                 122,078
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,867,335               2,064,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                   1,170
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,876,335               2,062,891
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,876,335               2,064,061
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,995                   7,457
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,519                  38,345
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,476                 (30,888)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,476                 (30,888)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 21-1528

Filed August 17, 2022

ROGER RICHARD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

CITY OF DUBUQUE and CITY OF DUBUQUE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY 

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dubuque County, Monica Zrinyi 

Ackley, Judge.

Roger Richard appeals the denial of his application for permanent 

injunction. AFFIRMED.

Roger Richard, Dubuque, self-represented appellant.

Crenna Brumwell of the City of Dubuque, Dubuque, for appellee.

Considered by Bower, C.J., and Schumacher and Ahlers, JJ.
2

AHLERS, Judge.

The City of Dubuque (City) obtained title to an abandoned property by using 

procedures under Iowa Code chapter 657A (2021). Roger Richard lived next door 

to the abandoned property and claimed to have a lease to the garage situated on 

it. He also claimed not to have received notice of the abandoned-property lawsuit. 

In an effort to prevent the City from disposing of his personal property in the 

garage, Richard filed this lawsuit seeking a permanent injunction against the City. 

The City sought dismissal of the suit, asserting that Richard has an adequate 

remedy at law, his claim is moot, and he cannot collaterally attack the order issued 

in the abandonment lawsuit that transferred title to the property to the City. The 

district court granted the City’s request for dismissal. Richard appeals.

We are unable to discern any issue that has been preserved for our review

or that has been adequately developed that could provide a pathway to allowing 

Richard to prevail. Therefore, we find no grounds for reversal and affirm without 

further opinion. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(e) (permitting a memorandum opinion 

when “[a] full opinion would not augment or clarify existing case law”).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chief Executive Officer, in connection with the Quarterly Report of CĪON Investment Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                                            
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 10, 2019





/s/ Michael A. Reisner


Michael A. Reisner


Co-Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


CĪON Investment Corporation
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0336 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 213

-AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet External Inspection

- Group 1 23.0 $1,955.0 0 $1,955.00 91 $177,905.00 External Inspection

- Group 2 6.0 $ 510.00 $ 510.00 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $177,905 

### Costs covered under warranty ( i f known ) $ **On -**  **Condition Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

Internal Inspection

- Group 1 (per location) 1.5 $ 127.50 $0 $ 127.50 Repair

- Group 1 (per repair) 7.0 $ 595.00 $0 $ 595.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**  Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO 

### * Explanation 

### :
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pegasus Aircraft Partners II, L.P. (the“Partnership”) for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Richard S. Wiley, President and Chairman of the Boardof Pegasus Aircraft Management Corporation, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certifythat:
 1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.       Date: March 30, 2005 By: /s/ RICHARD S. WILEY     Richard S. Wiley     President and Chairman of the Board of     Pegasus Aircraft Management Corporation