alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ludwig *v.*Union Collieries Company, Appellant.

Argued November 12, 1941.

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Rhodes, Hirt and Kenworthey, JJ.

*248
      *Edw. J. I.*Gannon, of Hazlett, *Gannon &*Walter, for appellant.

*Paul N. Barna,*for appellee.

January 30, 1942 :

Opinion by

Kenworthey, J.,

This workmen’s compensation case was commenced by the employer’s petition to terminate or modify a total disability agreement. The petition alleged that all disability had ceased and the employee was able to return to work on. October 17, 1938. The referee and the board found fifty percent disability and modified the agreement accordingly. The court affirmed. The employer has appealed and contends that the evidence does not support the finding of any disability and certainly none in excess of twenty-five percent.

The accident occurred January 26, 1938, and the compensation for total disability was paid to November 2, 1938, under an agreement. The injuries were to the head, neck, wrist, arm and shoulder. The cause of disability, if any, beyond October 17, 1938, was a nervous or mental condition, a deformity of the wrist resulting from a fracture, and arthritis of the right arm. Without reviewing it in detail, the evidence consisted of: (1) The opinion of a physician called by the employer who said there was no disability beyond October 17, 1938; (2) the opinion of a physician called by the employee who said he was suffering from a brain injury and bone injuries to the right arm, both of which resulted from the accident and that, as a result, he was totally disabled; (3) the opinion of an impartial expert who said that the disability was fifty percent, half of which was caused by the brain condition, but who ventured no very clear opinion as to whether the *249brain condition was. caused by. the accident; and (4) the opinion of an impartial expert who said that the disability was fifty percent, half of which was. caused by the deformity of. the right wrist and who. expressed no opinion as to the brain condition.

The opinions of the two impartial experts that the employee was fifty, percent disabled, coupled with the opinion of the physician called by claimant that both the brain injury and the injury to the wrist resulted from the accident, furnish ample evidence to support the board’s finding that all the disability which it allowed was due to the accident. And it should be! borne in mind that, on a petition to terminate or modify, the burden of proof is on the employer and the board was at liberty to accept or reject any part or all of the oral evidence offered by it. *Pelosi v. The Overbrook Tile Co.,*138 Pa. Superior Ct. 30, 34, 10 A. (2d) 118.

The order of the court below directing the entry of judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT NO. 11


                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Year Ended
                                              December 31, 1998
                                             --------------------
                                                        Earnings
                                             Shares     Per Share
                                             ------     ---------
                                               (In Thousands)
<S>                                          <C>        <C> 
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding     3,185       $0.73
                                              =====       ===== 
 
Diluted
  Average Shares Outstanding                  3,185
  Common Stock Equivalents                      167
                                              ----- 
 
                                              3,352       $0.69
                                              =====       ===== 
 
 
                                               Year Ended
                                             December 31, 1997
                                           --------------------
 
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding     2,951       $0.88
                                              =====       ===== 
 
Diluted
  Average Shares Outstanding                  2,951
  Common Stock Equivalents                      305
                                              ----- 
 
                                              3,256       $0.80
                                              =====       ===== 
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5

<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                              MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                                         6,238
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               6,238
<PP&E>                                                       171,979
<DEPRECIATION>                                                95,614
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               237,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      3,136,914
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                   13,500
<COMMON>                                                     696,942
<OTHER-SE>                                               (10,172,629)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 237,558
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   0
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          12,704,601
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           808,505
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (13,513,106)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (13,513,106)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            (3,583,272)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (17,096,378)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.34)



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 14131-000; Project No. 14138-000; Project No. 14135-000]

                    The Commission has received three preliminary permit applications deemed filed on April 1, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.,[1]                                          for proposed projects to be located on the Tombigbee River, in Monroe County, Mississippi. The applications were filed by Riverbank Hydro No. 1, LLC for Project No. 14131-000, Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XXXVII for Project No. 14138-000, and Qualified Hydro 20, LLC for Project No. 14135-000.                

                    On February 22, 2012, at 9 a.m. (Eastern Time), the Secretary of the                           ( print page 9231)                        Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided in section 4.37 of its regulations.[2]                                          The priority established by this drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed application.                

The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing the results of the drawing.

Dated: February 10, 2012.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any document received after regular business hours is considered filed at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) (2011).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             18 CFR 4.37 (2011).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2012-3634 Filed 2-15-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREILY AUDILMER SALVATIERRABONILLA, AKA Julio Maldonado-Chaj, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-71761 

Agency No. A099-830-330 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 4, 2020**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Greily Audilmer Salvatierra-Bonilla, a native and citizen of Guatemala, 

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order 

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his 

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

review de novo questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th 

Cir. 2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s interpretation

of the governing statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 

(9th Cir. 2004). We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. 

Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny the 

petition for review.

The BIA did not err in finding that Salvatierra-Bonilla failed to establish 

membership in a cognizable particular social group. See Reyes v. Lynch, 842 F.3d 

1125, 1131 (9th Cir. 2016) (in order to demonstrate membership in a particular 

social group, “[t]he applicant must ‘establish that the group is (1) composed of 

members who share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with 

particularity, and (3) socially distinct within the society in question’” (quoting 

Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 227, 237 (BIA 2014))). Substantial evidence 

supports the agency’s determination that Salvatierra-Bonilla otherwise failed to 

establish that he was and will be persecuted on account of a protected ground. See 

Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be 

free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang 

members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). Thus, Salvatierra-Bonilla’s

asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.
3 

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Salvatierra-Bonilla failed to show that it is more likely than not he would be 

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to

Guatemala. See Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EX-10.21



 IMAX CORPORATION 

EXHIBIT 10.21 
 FIRST
AMENDING AGREEMENT 
 This First Amending Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2015 (the “First Amending Agreement”), is made
between IMAX CORPORATION, a corporation organized under the laws of Canada (the “Company”), and RICHARD L. GELFOND (the “Executive”). 

WHEREAS, the Executive is currently the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and is employed pursuant to an Employment Agreement dated as of
January 1, 2014, by and between the Company and the Executive (the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of
Directors of the Company (the “Board”) and the Executive wish to amend certain provisions of the Agreement as set forth herein; 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows: 
  

	1.	Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. 

  

	2.	2016 Options: The 2016 Options which were to be granted to the Executive on January 5, 2016, shall instead be granted to the Executive as soon as practicable after, and conditional upon, shareholder approval
of additional shares for issuance under the LTIP. Such approval is expected to be obtained on or around June 3, 2016 and in no event will such 2016 Options be granted to Executive later than July 1, 2016. The 2016 Options shall vest as
follows: (i) 1/3 shall vest upon grant; (ii) 1/3 shall vest on September 1, 2016; and (iii) 1/3 shall vest on December 31, 2016. 

  

	3.	Except as amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force, unamended. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have duly executed and delivered this First Amending Agreement
as of the date first set forth above. 
  

			
	IMAX CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael Lynne

		 	Name: Michael Lynne
		 	Title: Director
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert D. Lister

		 	Name: Robert D. Lister
		 	Title: Chief Legal Officer and
		 	Chief Business Development Officer
	
	EXECUTIVE:
	
	 /s/ Richard L.
Gelfond            

	Richard L. Gelfond
CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                      OF
                  PAINEWEBBER/GEODYNE INSTITUTIONAL/PENSION
                      ENERGY INCOME P-2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

       The undersigned  General Partner hereby duly executes this Certificate of
Limited Partnership of PaineWebber/ Geodyne  Institutional/Pension Energy Income
P-2  Limited  Partnership  (the  "Partnership"),  which is being  filed with the
Secretary of State of the State of Texas in  accordance  with the Texas  Revised
Limited Partnership Act.

       1.    The   name   of   the    Partnership    is    PaineWebber/Geodyne
Institutional/Pension Energy Income P-2 Limited Partnership.

       2. The address of the registered  office of the  Partnership is 1360 Post
Oak Boulevard,  Suite 1500,  Houston,  TX 77056,  and the name of the registered
agent whose business  office  address will be the same as the registered  office
address is Geodyne Properties, Inc.

       3.    The address of the  principal  office of the  Partnership  in the
United States where its  partnership  records are to be kept or made available
is c/o Geodyne  Properties,  Inc.,  320 South Boston  Avenue,  The  Mezzanine,
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103-3708.

       4. The name, the mailing address,  and the street address of the business
or residence of each general partner of the Partnership are as follows:

Name                            Mailing Address          Business Address
----                            ---------------          ----------------

Geodyne Properties, Inc.        320 S. Boston Ave.       320 S. Boston Ave.
                                The Mezzanine            The Mezzanine
                                Tulsa, OK 74103-3706     Tulsa, OK 74103-3706

       SIGNED on this 29th day of September, 1988.

                                     GENERAL PARTNER:

                                     GEODYNE PROPERTIES, INC., a
                                     Delaware corporation

                                     By:  /s/ Michael E. Luttrell
                                          --------------------------------
                                     Name:    Michael E. Luttrell
                                     Title:   Executive Vice President
Exhibit 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Alan D. Martin, President and Chief Executive Officer of IF Bancorp, Inc., (the Company) and Pamela J. Verkler, Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify in their capacity as an officer of the Company that they have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (the Report) and
that to the best of their knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2011 |  | /s/ Alan D. Martin                   
|                        |  | Alan D. Martin                       
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Date: November 14, 2011 |  | /s/ Pamela J. Verkler                
|                        |  | Pamela J. Verkler                    
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer              

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.79 MB)

Tags:Clear, Alaska, AIR FORCE

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery