alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Allied Irish Banks, p.l.c., a public limited
liability company incorporated and registered in Ireland (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |              |  |                                                
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 16, 2004 |  |  |  | GARY KENNEDY
|                    |  |  |  | Name:        |  | Gary Kennedy                                   
|                    |  |  |  | Title:       |  | Group Director, Finance & Enterprise Technology



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
EX-10.74



 Exhibit 10.74 

English Translation 
  

 
 Power of Attorney 

The Company, Beijing Changyou Star Digital Technology Co., Ltd., a citizen/registered limited liability company in the People’s Republic of China
(hereinafter referred to as “China”), has a company registration number 110107019384580, and holds 100% equity of Beijing Guanyou Gamespace Digital Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Guanyou Gamespace”) as Guanyou Gamespace’s
shareholder. The Company again agrees to and irrevocably authorizes the person designated by the board of directors of Beijing Changyou Gamespace Software Technology Co.,Ltd. (the “ Gamespace “) from time to time in the form of a written
resolution (the “Trustee”) to exercise rights as follows within the term hereof: 
 Authorize the Trustee as the Company’s sole and exclusive
agent, to exercise on behalf of the Company, all the shareholders’ rights available to the Company according to Chinese laws and Guanyou Gamespace’s articles of association (the present and as revised from time to time), including but not
limited to: the right to propose a shareholders’ meeting (if applicable), accept any notice on the convening and proceedings of a shareholders’ meeting (if applicable), attend the shareholders’ meeting of Guanyou Gamespace and
exercise voting rights at the same (if applicable, including but not limited to nomination and election or appointment of Gamease’s directors, general manager, chief financial officer and other senior officers, decision on dividend, etc.), make
any shareholder’s decision, decide to sell or transfer its equity in Guanyou Gamespace in whole or in part, etc. 
 The above authorization is subject
to the Trustee’s employment by Gamespace or Gamespace’s affiliates. Once the Trustee resigns from Gamespace or its affiliates or Gamespace’s board of directors terminates the above authorization in the form of a resolution in writing
and with Gamespace’s written notice, the Company’s authorization will lose effect immediately and the Company will specify/authorize the new trustee nominated by Gamespace’s board of directors in the form of a written resolution to
exercise all the shareholders’ rights available to the Company. 
 The term hereof is the same as that of the Business Agreement signed by and among
Gamespace, Guanyou Gamespace and other parties on July 6, 2015. Where the above Business Agreement is terminated early or delayed in accordance with its terms, the Power of Attorney and the Business Agreement will terminate at the same time, or
at the same time be extended to the extent that they are extended by the same period. Within the term hereof, the Power of Attorney shall not be modified or terminated without the written consent of Gamespace. 

Beijing Changyou Star Digital Technology Co., Ltd. (seal) 

July 6, 2015
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-1445

Lower Tribunal No. 2022-CT-000291-E

_____________________________

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellant,

v.

DARREN ROBERT EARL CRITTENDEN,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the County Court for Orange County.

Brian F. Duckworth, Judge.

April 30, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, NARDELLA and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. Pallas, Jr., Assistant 

Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Ryan M. Belanger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1997 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          56,996
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  565,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                    66,225
<INVENTORY>                                     76,531
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               763,944
<PP&E>                                       2,006,439
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,009,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,415,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          921,783
<BONDS>                                        925,404
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    724,820
<COMMON>                                       112,055
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,415,593
<SALES>                                      3,318,528
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,318,528
<CGS>                                        1,674,596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,674,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                26,891
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                417,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                   166,995
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            250,312
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   250,312
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.29
        

</TABLE>
8. ATTACHMENTS:

1. SJVUAPCD Rule 9510, “Indirect Source Review (ISR).” 

2. “SJVUAPCD Final Draft Staff Report” for Rule 9510 (including Appendices A through 

G) dated December 15, 2005 and submitted to EPA on December 29, 2006. We will 

refer to this document as the “Staff Report.” These documents are also available on 

SJVUAPCD’s web site at http://www.valleyair.org/ISR/ISRSupportDocuments.htm.

3. SJVUAPCD’s Board Resolution No. 07-04-11b, “In the Matter of: Adopting 

Commitments to Enhance SIP Creditability of Incentive-Based Emission Reductions.”

4. SJVUAPCD’s March 1, 2006 document entitled, “Application Review Process Flow 

Chart.” This document is also available at: 

http://www.valleyair.org/isr/Documents/ISRProcessFlowChart.pdf

5. SJVUAPCD Annual Reports to the Governing Board. Page 5 of “2008 Annual Report on 

the District’s Indirect Source Review Rule,” and page 3 of “2007 Annual Report on the 

District’s Indirect Source Review Rule.” These documents are also available at: 

http://www.valleyair.org/ISR/ISRResources.htm#ISRReports

6. Excerpts: Table 4-1 in the 2004 1-hour Ozone Plan and Table 2 in EPA’s proposed 

approval of the plan at 74 FR 33933 (July 14, 2009)
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0561 Directorate ID: 2010-SW-001-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. Model 205A, 205A-1, 205B, 212, 412, 412CF, and 

412EP Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 263 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: to detect corrosion or pitting in the forward spar area of a tail rotor (T/R) blade in order to 

prevent a crack in the T/R blade, loss of the T/R blade, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $17,495 for each T/R blade assembly

Labor per Helicopter

(10 x $85/work-hour to 

remove, inspect, refinish, and 

re-install)

(6 x $85/work-hour to 

replace)

$850

$510

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $850 to remove, inspect, refinish, and re-install

$18,005 to replace 

Total US Fleet Cost $277,565, assuming all affected helicopters are 

inspected and three tail rotor blades are replaced in 

the US fleet

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Michael Kohner
#### Marilyn Korenyi, an Infant, by Viola Korenyi, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, *v.*Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

November 24, 1958.

*119
      *Tanner, Friend, Kinnan d Post (David B. Crow*of counsel), for appellant.

*Joseph Terranova*and *James F. Coughlin*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The wording of the beneficiary designation, fairly construed, authorized the defendant, in the event of the insured’s death during the infant plaintiff’s minority, to pay the proceeds of the policy to Julius Korenyi as the alternate beneficiary.

The judgment and order granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $10 costs to the defendant, and summary judgment granted in favor of the defendant, dismissing the complaint on the merits.

Concur — Pette, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.
______________________________________ _________________________________________________ __________________

*TYPED/PRINTED FULL NAME *SIGNATURE * DATE

Defense Intelligence Agency FOIA Request Form

Items marked with (*) are required.

Prefix:

*

Street Address:

City: State: Zip code:

First Name: Middle Name: Last Name: * *

* * *

Requester Information 

Requester Status

In order to help to determine potential fees please select one of the following:

____ An individual seeking information for personal use. 

____ Affiliated with an educational or noncommercial scientific institution, 

and this request is made for a scholarly purpose. 

____ Affiliated with a private corporation and seeking information for use in 

the company's business. 

____ A representative of the news media/press and this request is made as 

part of news gathering and not for commercial use.

____ Affiliated with a public interest group and this request is not for ____________________________

Fees

The maximum dollar amount I am willing to pay for this request is $ ______. 

Please notify me if the fees will exceed $25.00 or the maximum dollar amount I 

entered. 

____ I request a waiver of all fees for this request. Disclosure of the requested 

information to me is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute 

significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the 

commercial use. government and is not primarily in my commercial interest. 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

FOIA Request

Please describe the records you seek, and provide any additional pertinet information

By signing above you affirm that you have filled out this form to the best of your ability and provided all known information that could aid in the search of the record(s) you have requested. 

Failure to provide all pertiant information could negativly impart the ability and time required complete the request.

Defense Intelligence Agency Contact Information:

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Defense Intelligence Agency 

ATTN: IMO-2C (FOIA)

7400 Pentagon 

Washington, DC 20301-7400 

Mailing Address: Email: FOIA1@dodiis.mil

Phone Number: (301) 394-6253

Form Updated Sept. 2022

Form Updated Sept. 2022

Phone Number: Email:

* *

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Please fill out the following so that, if fees are determined, we know if/when 

to contact you regarding them.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.35 MB)

Tags:Loglines, November 2017, Korea

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### Joseph BYRNES, Appellant, v. Joseph W. SANFORD, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Appellee.

No. 9392.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 13, 1940.

Joseph Byrnes, in pro per.

Lawrence S. Camp, U. S.- Atty., and Harvey H. Tisinger and Jas. T. Manning, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Atlanta, Ga., for appel-lee.

Before SIBLEY, HUTCHESON, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### William Franklin PROBST, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-89-987.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Nov. 1, 1991.

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR REHEARING

The State of Oklahoma has filed a Petition for Rehearing asking that the Court clarify certain language set forth in the opinion handed down herein on September 9,1991. Now on this 1st day of November, 1991, having examined the Petition for Rehearing filed by the State of Oklahoma in the above styled and numbered cause, and being fully advised in the premesis, this Court finds that clarification of certain language concerning statutory construction is necessary and that the petition should be, and is hereby GRANTED.

The clarification required does not change the ultimate disposition of the case. However, to avoid unnecessary confusion the original opinion handed down in the above styled and numbered cause is hereby WITHDRAWN.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ James F. Lane JAMES F. LANE Presiding Judge

/s/ Gary Lumpkin GARY LUMPKIN Vice Presiding Judge

/s/ Tom Brett TOM BRETT Judge

*/&/*Ed Parks ED PARKS, Judge

*/&/*Charles A. Johnson CHARLES A. JOHNSON, Judge
## NO. 12

- 19

- 00188

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

INTERTEK ASSET INTEG RITY

MANAGEMENT, INC.,

APPELLANT

V.

DARRIN TODD DIRKSEN,

APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appell ee, Darrin Todd Dirksen, filed a n unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. The

parties agree that the appeal has become moot

. No decision has been delivered in this appeal.

Accordingly, Appell ee ’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed as moot

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42. 1 (a) (1)

.
Opinion delivered March 18 , 2020.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MARCH 18 , 2020

NO. 12

- 19

- 00188

- CV

INTERTEK ASSET INTEG RITY MANAGEMENT, INC

., Appellant

V.
DARRIN TODD DIRKSEN,
Appellee

Appeal from the 7th District Court

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 19

- 1029

- A)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the motion of the Appell ee, Darrin Todd

Dirksen, to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED,

ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal

be dismissed as moot

, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

August 19, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00296

- CR

Neil Howard MCGINNIS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas

, Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court

, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6781 Honorable Ki rsten Cohoon , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On August 10, 2020, we advised the court reporter that the records were late. On August 17, 2020, court reporter Connie Calvert advised this court that counsel has not asked her to

prepare the reporter’s records

.
W e ORDER Appellant to provide written proof to this court wi thin TEN DAYS of the date of this order that (1) Appellant has delivered a written request to prepare the reporter’s
record s to court reporter Connie Calvert that designates any exhibits to be included, see T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 34.6(b), and (2) either the arran gements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee, or Appellant is entitled to free reporter’s record s , see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.2.

If Appellant fails to respond as ordered , Appellant’s brief s will be due within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points raised in Appellant’s brief

s that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set m y hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of August, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**     Theundersigned, Remo Reale, is an authorized officer of The Bank of New York, thetrustee of BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (the “registrant”).     This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the registrant of theregistrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”).     By execution of this statement, I certify that: (A) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and  (B) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant as of thedates and for the periods covered by the Report.Date: March 1, 2007       By: /s/ Remo Reale    RemoReale    Vice President
APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS

(Position to which Appointed) (Date Appointed)
DOD DIA
(Department or Agency) (Bureau or Division) (Place of Employment)
iF , do solemnly swear (or affirm) that—
A. OATH OF OFFICE

I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against al! enemies, foreign and domestic;
that | will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that | take this obligation freely, without any mental
reservation or purpose of evasion; and that | will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which
lam about to enter. So help me God.

B. AFFIDAVIT AS TO STRIKING AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

| am not participating in any strike against the Government of the United States or any agency thereof,
and | will not so participate while an employee of the Government of the United States or any agency
thereof.

C. AFFIDAVIT AS TO THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF OFFICE

| have not, nor has anyone acting in my behalf, given, transferred, promised or paid any consideration
for or in expectation or hope of receiving assistance in securing this appointment.

(Signature of Appointee)
Subscribed and sworn (or affirmed) before me this___ day of oe
at
(City) (State)
(SEAL) (Signature of Officer)
Commission expires_______
(ifby @ Notary Public, the date of his/her Commission should be shown) Title)

Note - if the appointee objects to the form of the oath on religious grounds, certain modifications may be permitted pursuant to the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Please contact your agency's legal counsel for advice.

‘Standard Form 61
U.S. Office of Personnel Management Revised August 2002
The Guide to Processing Personnel Actions NSN 7540-00-634-4015 Previous editions not usable