alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
pursuant toTitle 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, James Vandeberg, Chief Financial
Officer of Reg Technologies Inc.., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Reg Technologies Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Reg Technologies Inc.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: September 23, 2014 | /s/ “James Vandeberg”    
|------------------------ | -------------------------
|                         | James Vandeberg          
|                         | (Chief Financial Officer)



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Reg Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Reg Technologies Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending January 5, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. T. Malugen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
April 7, 2003

|/s/ J. T. MalugenName: J. T. Malugen
Its: Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Movie Gallery, Inc. and will be retained by Movie
Gallery, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 29 Referred in House (RFH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 29

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2014

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for the appointment of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Patricia Q. Stonesifer of 
Washington, DC, on December 21, 2013, is filled by the appointment of 
Risa Lavizzo-Mourey of Pennsylvania. The appointment is for a term of 6 
years, beginning on the later of December 22, 2013, or the date of 
enactment of this joint resolution.

            Passed the Senate January 29, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of SafeNet, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony A. Caputo,
the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Anthony A. Caputo
Anthony A. Caputo
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
March 10, 2004
02/25/201 1 14:4 4 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS aooi/ooi 

PA^q^l^tWc MALONEY & MILLER 

. ,^ „ _ -jy^ j.p . .XTOHMEYS AT LAW 

lyiHWERfilDB AVE., SUITE 91 1 

•ikuMt, WASHIKGTON 9930 1 •KET OPE 

Thomu B. Maloney (19M) '--'• ' CO / O f-^ ^.- b i 

Thonuu J. MUIer 

Telcphoaa: (509)-634-3020 

PBcatanile: (509| 623-1650 

Not for Service or Notice 

February 11,2011 

Ucaulln/^la.via.tioa-ltL'w.com 

VIA FAX: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, AU 

Office of Hearines. M-20 

US Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, S.W., Room 5411 

Washington, DC 20590 

Fax; 202-366-7536 

Federal Aviation Adnunistration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk AGC-43U 

Wilbur Wright Bdg, Suite 2W1000 

Karen Davis Huber, Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Nonhwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057-3356 

Fax: 425-227-1007 

RE; Empire Airlines 

FAA Docket No: CP06NM0009 / c^OO^ -OfT ^ 

Please note that the undersigned is not the attorney of record for the above captioned civil penalty 

action. All future notices and service should be sent directly to Empire Airlines, Inc. We 

respecifully request that all parties amend their service list to reflect die correct status. 

Accordingly, by a copy of this letccr, Empire Aii'lines will be notified of this discrepancy. 

Very truly yours, 

CONLIN, MALONEY & MILLER 

Mark jrCo'nIin 

MJC/gd 

cc: Knpirc MrlJJies *^^R/NG DOCKET
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.84 MB)

Tags:GW, Ship, Carrier, Ocean, Cliff, wave, george washington, hull-swap, NAVAL, Navy 

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1


August 5, 2016


Via EDGAR


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F. Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





Re:Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Ladies and Gentlemen:


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Trust.

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.





The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.Trustee for Chesapeake Granite Wash TrustBy:/s/ Sarah C. NewellSarah C. NewellVice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,892
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,365
<INVENTORY>                                     36,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,498
<PP&E>                                          25,439
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,929
<BONDS>                                         21,167
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,940
<SALES>                                         65,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,032
<CGS>                                           31,690
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    96
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   160
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,829
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,867
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,962
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,962
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 18**

March 1, 2010 

The Board of Directors 

Silgan Holdings Inc. 

4 Landmark Square 

Suite 400 

Stamford, CT 06901 

Dear Directors: 

Note 1 of Notes to theconsolidated financial statements of Silgan Holdings Inc. included in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, describes a change in the method of accounting for inventory valuation in the Company’s U.S. plastic containerbusiness from the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method to the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. There are no authoritative criteria for determining a ‘preferable’ inventory method based on the particular circumstances; however, we concludethat such a change in method of accounting is to an acceptable alternative method which, based on your business judgment to make this change and for the stated reasons, is preferable in your circumstances. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Beaufort Exploration Licence 446 (Ajurak) 

Submission Regarding the Relief Well Policy 

for Offshore Drilling in Arctic Waters

Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited, 

Calgary 

IPRCC.PR.2010.06 

March 2010 
March 2010 Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited 4-7 

CC004 

Section 4.3

 SSRW CAPABILITY 

SUBMISSION REGARDING 

THE RELIEF WELL POLICY 

FOR OFFSHORE DRILLING 

IN ARCTIC WATERS 

 CAPABILITY IN SHALLOW WATER 

LIMITATIONS THROUGHOUT THE OFFSHORE 

For most circumstances in deepwater, completing a relief well operation in a 

single season is impossible. In many instances, completing a relief well operation 

in shallow water, or even on land, could also be unlikely or impossible. 

Figure 4-4 shows the typical types of drilling rigs that could be used through a 

range of geographical and geological conditions. 

Number of Wells Drilled • 37 wells* • 48 wells* • 0 wells

Winter Season • 120 days • none • none

Open Water Season • 85 days • 70 days • 50 days

• dynamically positioned 

drilling

• bottom-founded and • moored drilling

moored drilling

Type of Offshore Drilling Rig

• land-fast, first-year ice • multi-year ice intrusions • multi-year ice present

• limited multi-year ice

Ice

• 3,500 m • 4,500–5,000 m • 5,000 m and deeper True Vertical Depth (TVD)

Water Depth • 0 m–25 m • 25 m–100 m • 100 m–1,200 m

Factors Shallow Shelf Deep Shelf Slope

Number of Wells Drilled • 37 wells* • 48 wells* • 0 wells

Winter Season • 120 days • none • none

Open Water Season • 85 days • 70 days • 50 days

• dynamically positioned 

drilling

• bottom-founded and • moored drilling

moored drilling

Type of Offshore Drilling Rig

• land-fast, first-year ice • multi-year ice intrusions • multi-year ice present

• limited multi-year ice

Ice

• 3,500 m • 4,500–5,000 m • 5,000 m and deeper True Vertical Depth (TVD)

Water Depth • 0 m–25 m • 25 m–100 m • 100 m–1,200 m

Factors Shallow Shelf Deep Shelf Slope

*Source: Geologic Survey of Canada

0 m 25 m 100 m 650 m 1,200 m

Shore Shallow Shelf Deep Shelf Slope

• expected Ajurak drilling location is in water 650 m deep

0 m 25 m 100 m 650 m 1,200 m

Shore Shallow Shelf Deep Shelf Slope

• expected Ajurak drilling location is in water 650 m deep

Figure 4-4: Environmental Factors Influencing Well Design and Planning 

The deep shelf has a lower probability of unwanted incursions of multi-year ice 

than the deepwater on the slope. However, the geologic targets can be just as 

deep, and the resupply and operations window constraints also apply. 

On the shallow shelf and on land, the operations are typically on bottom-founded 

rigs and the season is the winter season rather than the summer open-water 

season. Although the geologic targets are generally more shallow than those
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Richard S. Wiley, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pegasus Aircraft Partners II, L.P.
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financing reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.    Date: March 30, 2005     By: /s/ RICHARD S. WILEY   Richard S. Wiley President and Chairman of the Board of Pegasus Aircraft Management Corporation, General Partner of Pegasus Aircraft Partners II, L.P.
September 03, 2015

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 W Front St Ste 354

Tyler TX 75702

- 7854

Re: Gerardo Fernando Romo

- Orta



### 12

- 15

- 00116

- CR

To The Honorable Clerk of the Court:

Please find enclosed a copy of the letter sent to my client regarding his right to file a PDR along

with a copy of the certified return receipt showing the mailing of the same.

Sincerely,

/s/ Austin Reeve Jackson ACCEPTED

12-15-00116-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

9/3/2015 4:13:42 PM

Pam Estes

CLERKSeptember 03, 2015

Gerardo Fernando Romo

- Orta

Inmate

Smith County Jail

206 E. Elm

Tyler

, TX 75702

Re: Opinion

Mr. Romo

- Orta :

Please find enclosed a copy of opinion issued by the Court of Appeals in your case. The Court

has affirmed your conviction.

Should you desire to do so, you do have the right to file a pro se Petition for Discretionary

Review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. If you decide to pursue that option you must file your

petition prior to the expiration of thirty days from the date of the court’s opinion

.

I would be happy to address any questions or concerns you have if you will simply let me know.

Sincerely,

Austin Reeve Jackson
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7109** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. IVAN JULIAN STEVENSON, a/k/a Ike, a/k/a Isaac , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Harrisonburg
. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 5:93

- cr - 30025

- JPJ

- 3; 5:14

- cv - 80740

- JPJ

- RSB )

Submitted : November 18 , 2014 Decided: November 21, 2014

Before NIEMEYER , MOTZ, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Ivan Julian Stevenson, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy J. Heaphy, United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia; Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, C harlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ivan Julian Stevenson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Sla ck v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stevenson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argume nt would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED