Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 2012 / Notices 8279 

population revealed that a State would 

be responsible for entering subgrant data 

for as many as 499 programs (California) 

to as few as 9 programs (District of 

Columbia). 

The estimated time to enter a record 

via the Grants Management System is 

three minutes (.05 hour). Therefore, the 

estimated clerical time can range from 

27 minutes to 25 hours, based on the 

number of records that are entered. It 

would take 265 hours to enter 5,300 

responses electronically [5,300 × .05 

hour]. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The current estimated 

burden is 265 (5,300 responses × .05 

hour per response = 265 hours). There 

is no increase in the annual 

recordkeeping and reporting burden. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Jerri Murray, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street, NE., Room 2E– 

508, Washington, DC 20530 

Jerri Murray, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3370 Filed 2–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–81,097] 

Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc., a 

Subsidiary of Kimberly-Clark 

Corporation, Everett Mill, Including OnSite Leased Workers From Injury Free, 

Incorporated, Ventilation Power 

Cleaning, Inc., Covenant Security 

Services, Healthforce, Uniseve 

Corporation, Jacobs Engineering and 

Stafflogix Corporation, Everett, WA; 

Amended Certification Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 

19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor 

issued a Certification of Eligibility to 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance on December 14, 2011, 

applicable to workers of Kimberly-Clark 

Worldwide, Inc., a subsidiary of 

Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Everett 

Mill, including on-site leased workers 

from Injury Free, Incorporated, 

Ventilation Power Cleaning, Inc., 

Covenant Security Services, 

Healthforce, UNISEVE Corporation and 

Jacobs Engineering, Everett, 

Washington. The workers are engaged in 

activities related to the production of 

tissue products (paper towels, toilet 

paper, wipes) and wood pulp. The 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register on December 29, 2011 (76 FR 

81988). 

At the request of Washington State 

and a company official, the Department 

reviewed the certification for workers of 

the subject firm. New information from 

the company shows that workers leased 

from STAFFLOGIX Corporation were 

employed on-site at the Everett, 

Washington location of Kimberly-Clark 

Worldwide, Inc., a subsidiary of 

Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Everett 

Mill. The Department has determined 

that these workers were sufficiently 

under the control of Kimberly-Clark 

Worldwide, Inc., a subsidiary of 

Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Everett 

Mill to be considered leased workers. 

The intent of the Department’s 

certification is to include all workers of 

the subject firm who were adversely 

affected by increased company imports 

of tissue products (paper towels, toilet 

paper, wipes) and wood pulp. 

Based on these findings, the 

Department is amending this 

certification to include workers leased 

from STAFFLOGIX Corporation 

working on-site at the Everett, 

Washington location of the subject firm. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–81,097 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers from Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, 

Inc., a subsidiary of Kimberly-Clark 

Corporation, Everett Mill, including on-site 

leased workers from Injury Free, 

Incorporated, Ventilation Power Cleaning, 

Inc., Covenant Security Services, Healthforce, 

UNISEVE Corporation, Jacobs Engineering 

and STAFFLOGIX Corporation, Everett, 

Washington, who became totally or partially 

separated from employment on or after 

February 13, 2010, through December 16, 

2013, and all workers in the group threatened 

with total or partial separation from 

employment on date of certification through 

two years from the date of certification, are 

eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 

under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act 

of 1074, as amended. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of 

January 2012. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3325 Filed 2–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of January 9, 2012 

through January 13, 2012. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

Following Must Be Satisfied 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

Following Must Be Satisfied 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

8280 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 2012 / Notices 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 1- 

year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) The 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1-year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

80,488 ............... Plexus Services Corp., Plexus Corp., Adecco ................................. Nampa, ID ................................... July 24, 2011. 

81,079 ............... Sierrapine ......................................................................................... Rocklin, CA ................................. February 13, 2010. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

80,467 ............... Covad Communications Company, d/b/a Megapath ....................... Seattle, WA ................................. September 23, 2010. 

81,075 ............... Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), Volt and HCL America, Inc. Austin, TX ................................... February 13, 2010. 

81,075A ............. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), Volt and HCL America, Inc. Sunnyvale, CA ............................ February 13, 2010. 

81,105 ............... WellPoint, Inc., Colorado/Nevada Utilization Management Intake 

Division.

Denver, CO ................................. February 13, 2010. 

81,120 ............... Euclid Industries Inc,, A Subsidiary of M & R Corporate Services, LLC.Bay City, MI ................................ February 13, 2010. 

81,126 ............... Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd (Portland Office), Argonaut 

Management Services Division, including home-based workers.

Portland, OR ............................... February 13, 2010. 

81,126A ............. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

Chicago, IL .................................. February 13, 2010. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 2012 / Notices 8281 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

81,126B ............. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

Geneva, IL .................................. February 13, 2010. 

81,126C ............. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

Peoria, IL .................................... February 13, 2010. 

81,126D ............. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

Denver, CO ................................. February 13, 2010. 

81,126E ............. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

Fresno, CA .................................. February 13, 2010. 

81,126F ............. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

Redwood City, CA ...................... February 13, 2010. 

81,126G ............. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

Los Angeles, CA ......................... February 13, 2010. 

81,126H ............. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

San Antonio, TX ......................... February 13, 2010. 

81,126I .............. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

Dallas, TX ................................... February 13, 2010. 

81,126J .............. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

Greenfield, MA ............................ February 13, 2010. 

81,126K ............. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

Boston, MA ................................. February 13, 2010. 

81,126L ............. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

Jersey City, NJ ........................... February 13, 2010. 

81,126M ............ Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

New York, NY ............................. February 13, 2010. 

81,126N ............. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

Richmond, VA ............................. February 13, 2010. 

81,126O ............. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, Argo Group International 

Division.

Scottsdale, AZ ............................ February 13, 2010. 

81,138 ............... Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc., Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable, All Star Staffing Group.Exeter, PA ................................... February 13, 2010. 

81,151 ............... Ahlstrom Glass Nonwovens LLC ..................................................... Bishopville, SC ............................ February 13, 2010. 

81,170 ............... Thomson Reuters Markets, LLC ...................................................... Boston, MA ................................. February 13, 2010. 

81,175 ............... Albany International, PMC Division .................................................. Menasha, WI ............................... February 13, 2010. 

81,193 ............... Segue Manufacturing Services, LLC, On-Site Leased Workers 

From Additional Contract Services, Express, and Tech.

Lowell, MA .................................. February 13, 2010. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

81,146 ............... L.A. Darling Company, LLC, Wood Division, Staffmark .................. Piggott, AR .................................. February 13, 2010. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

80,432 ............... Infuscience South Carolina, LLC ..................................................... North Charleston, SC.

81,047 ............... ERA Systems LLC (Formerly ERA Systems Corporation), a Subsidiary of SRA Corporation.Syracuse, NY.

81,135 ............... Peninsula Daily News ...................................................................... Port Angeles, WA.

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

The following determination 

terminating an investigation was issued 

because the petitioner has requested 

that the petition be withdrawn. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

81,168 ............... Lightspeed Technologies ................................................................. Tualatin, OR.

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

8282 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 2012 / Notices 

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of January 9, 

2012 through January 13, 2012. These 

determinations are available on the 

Department’s Web site at tradeact/taa/ 

taa search form.cfm under the 

searchable listing of determinations or 

by calling the Office of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance toll-free at 888– 

365–6822. 

Dated: January 23, 2012. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2012–3323 Filed 2–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of January 16, 2012 

through January 20, 2012. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

Following Must Be Satisfied 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) All of the 

Following Must Be Satisfied 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and 

the component parts it supplied to the 

firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) a loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 1- 

year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES