alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of New Horizons Worldwide, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in Form 10-K.

Dated: March 15, 2004

/s/  Thomas J. Bresnan 
Thomas J. Bresnan
Chief Executive Officer

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C.
78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by
reference.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of GWG Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jon R. Sabes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Jon Gangelhoff, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/  Jon R. Sabes


Jon R. Sabes


Chief Executive Officer





May 15, 2012








/s/  Jon Gangelhoff


Jon Gangelhoff


Chief Financial Officer





May 15, 2012
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of New Source Energy Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: June 22, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Kristian B. Kos                  
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Kristian B. Kos                      
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                     CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Douglas  H.  Symons,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Goran Capital Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

(1)the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2002  (the  "Report")  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  April  15,  2003          By:  /s/  Douglas  H.  Symons
                                       ------------------------
                                            Douglas  H.  Symons
                                      Chief  Executive  Officer
Complete the following tables for each sampling pointPlant NameSampleCollectionNumberDate of SampleCollectionSample CollectionTime Temperature (°C)pH(S.U.)Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Plant NameSampleCollectionNumberUnit OverflowSampled atInfluent(1, 2, or 3)Influent SamplesCollected as Grabs(Yes or No)Mercury and CyanideSamples Collected asGrabs(Yes or No)Effluent SamplesCollected as 24-Hour Composites(Yes or No)Tyvek Suitsused(Yes or No)Dust MasksUsed forMercury(Yes or No)Clean Hands/DirtyHands SamplingTechniques Used(Yes or No)Description of SampleCollection Technique (ifdifferent thaninstructions)Description of AbnormalConditions in FGD Systemor FGD WastewaterTreatment System that MayImpact ConcentrationsSet 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Complete the following tables based on the plant operating characteristics during each set of samples collectedUnits OperatingDuring SamplingDayUnits Off-lineEntireSampling DaySCRs/SNCRsOperating onUnitsSet 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Flow Rate (gpm) DurationSet 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Lime Usage(tons)Ferric ChlorideUsage(Liters/day)Organosulfide Usage(Liters/day)Polymer Usage(Liters/day)Acid Usage(Liters/day)ChemicalPrecipitationSystem EffluentFlow Rate (gpd)Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Scrubber SlurryPercent SolidsPercent HydrocloneOverflow RecycledBack to ScrubberPlant NameSampleCollectionNumberDate of SampleCollectionPlant Operation During Sample CollectionFGD Wastewater Treatment Operation During Sample CollectionPlant NameSampleCollectionNumberDate of SampleCollectionScrubber PurgeFlow Rate DuringInfluent SampleCollection(gpm)Plant NameSampleCollectionNumberDate of SampleCollectionPlant Operation During Sample CollectionScrubber Slurry Blowdown FlowRate

# Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Daily Power Generation (MW-hrs)

Plant Name Date Provide the daily power generation for each scrubbed unit starting two weeks prior to the first

set of samples through the last set of samples

# FGD Wastewater Treatment System Flow

Rates

(gpd)

Chemical Precipitation Effluent Plant Name Date Provide the average flow rate in the FGD wastewater treatment system for each stream included in the

table starting two weeks prior to the first set of samples through the last set of samples
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00001

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

00001\00001_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 00001\00001_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00001\00001_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00001\00001_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00001\00001_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00001\00001_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00001\00001_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00001\00001_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00001\00001_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00001\Certification Statement Plant ID_00001.pdf Plant certification statement

x 00001\Supporting Documentation\00001_MAP_WB.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00001\Supporting Documentation\00001_POND-1.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00001\Supporting Documentation\00001_Study Ash Pond Berm Stability.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00001\Supporting Documentation\00001_Study Ash Pond Berm Stability.zip Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00001\Supporting Documentation\00001_Table C-6 revision _1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00001\Supporting Documentation\00001_TEC Cinder Pit Overflow Drain Evaluation.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00001\Supporting Documentation\00001_Well_diagram.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00001\00001_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00001\00001_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 00001\00001_questions.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Section 1350 Certifications



I am the Principal Financial Officer
of Ameritek Ventures, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended November 30, 2017 and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form
10-Q”).



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Ameritek Ventures (the “Company”)
certifies to his knowledge that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2017 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | The information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                                



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth P. Mayeaux     
|Kenneth P. Mayeaux         
|Principal Financial Officer
|                           
|Date:  January 22, 2017
ACCEPTED

14-14-00167-CR

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

3/11/2015 4:10:01 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/11/2015 4:10:01 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                         LLOYDS BAHAMAS SECURITIES, LTD.
                                 NEW PROVIDENCE
                               NASSAU, THE BAHAMAS



                                        November 14, 2000




Select Media Communications, Inc.
666 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10017

                  RE: Financing Commitment

Gentlemen:

         This will confirm that Lloyds Bahamas Securities, Ltd. ("Lloyds") is
ready and able to provide $500,000 in total financing to enable Select Media
Communications, Inc. ("Select Media") to make the down payments totalling
$500,000 for the acquisition of Betelgeuse Productions, LLC. Lloyd's is prepared
to forward necessary funds on the schedule required by the letter of intent,
executed by the Select Media on August 23, 2000, as amended, November 8, 2000.
Once you present Lloyds with a fully executed copy of the definitive asset
purchase agreement, Lloyds will require to your account, or to your order,
$200,000, which constitutes the cash down payment required upon execution of the
asset purchase agreement. Every thirty (30) days thereafter, for three periods,
Lloyds will forward to Betelgeuse the required $100,000 additional down payment.

         This is an unconditional commitment on Lloyds behalf to fund the total
of $500,000 for the down payment required under the letter of intent.

         If you have any questions concerning this, please call me.

                                        LLOYDS BAHAMAS SECURITIES, LTD.



                                        BY: /s/ THOMAS KESSLER
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           THOMAS KESSLER,
                                           Managing Director
Order entered August 13, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 00267 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 00268 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 00269 - CR CHRISTOPHER JAMES RY ALS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial D istrict Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F05 - 18864 - U , F12 - 40687 - U, F12 - 41706 - U



### O RDER T he Court has before it appellant’s August 5, 2013 motion to extend time to file his brief. In the motion, counsel states the record is not complete. T he Court has reviewed the record before it and determined the following.

 In cause no. 05

- 13

- 00267

- CR, it appears a plea hearing was conducted on November 2, 2005 and a punishment hearing was conducted on January 19, 2006. The records of these hearings hav e not been filed, and the Court cannot determine from the clerk’s record who recorded the hearings.

 In cause no. 05

- 13

- 00268

- CR, a plea hearing was conducted on June 20, 2012. The docket sheet contained in the clerk’s record reflects that Winnie Lacy rec orded th e hearing. In all three cases, a hearing was conducted on February 13, 2013. The reporter’s record

of this hearing has been filed. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the following:

 As to cause no. 05

- 13

- 00267

- CR , (1) whether hearings were conducted on November 2, 2005 and January 19, 2006; (2) if hearings were conducted on those dates, whether the hearings were recorded; (3) if the hearings were recorded, the name of the court reporter(s) who recorded the hearings; (4) whether the notes are available and can be transcribed; (5) if the notes are available, the date by which the records will be filed; and (6) if the notes are not available or cannot be transcribed, whether appellant is at fault for the lo ss or destruction of the notes and whether the parties can agree on a substituted record.

 As to cause no. 05

- 13

- 00268

- CR , (1) whether the notes of the June 20, 2012 hearing are available and can be transcribed; (2) if the notes are available, the date by which the record will be filed; and (3) if the notes are not available or cannot be transcribed, whether appellant is at fault for the loss or destruction of the notes and whether the parties can agree on a substituted record. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, including its written findings of fact, any orders, and any supporting documentation to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. We ABATE the appeals to allow the trial court to comply with the order. The appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7007** 

DEMETRIUS L. GREEN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MS. CAPERS, Jail Administrator; MR. BROOKS, Jail Guard; MS. ELMORE, Jail Guard , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson

. Jacquelyn Denise Austin , Magistrate Judge. ( 8:16

- cv - 00126

- DCN

- JDA )

Submitted : September 13, 2016 Decided: September 15, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Demetrius L. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Clifford Rollins, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in th is circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Demetrius L

. Green seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s

text orders denying his motion s to amend his complaint and to compel discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (20 12 ), and c ertain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (20 12 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The text order s Green seeks to appeal are neither final order s nor appealable interlocutory or
collateral order s . Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional p rocess.
DISMISSED
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.17




    
2016 BASE SALARY TABLE FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


The 2016 annual base salaries of the following Named Executive Officers of Ameren Corporation (“Ameren”), Union Electric Company (“UE”) and Ameren Illinois Company (“AIC”) (which officers are  employed by Ameren and/or an Ameren subsidiary as of February 28, 2016, and were determined to the extent applicable by reference to the Ameren Proxy Statement and the UE and AIC Information Statements for the 2016 annual meetings of shareholders and by reference to the definition of “Named Executive Officer” in Item 402(a)(3) of SEC Regulation S-K) are as follows: 


	
		
	Name and Position at February 28, 2016
	2016 Base Salary

	Warner L. Baxter
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer - Ameren 
	$1,040,000

	Martin J. Lyons, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer - Ameren, UE and AIC 
	$640,000

	Michael L. Moehn
Chairman and President - UE
	$512,000

	Richard J. Mark
Chairman and President - AIC
	$490,000

	Gregory L. Nelson
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and  Secretary - Ameren, UE and AIC
	$479,000

	Daniel F. Cole
Chairman and President - Ameren Services Company 
	$444,000

	Fadi M. Diya
Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer - UE
	$450,000

	Bruce A. Steinke
Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Accounting Officer - Ameren, UE and AIC
	$357,000
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41490 Conference Calendar

ROBERT MEADOWS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus W. CLARK; M. MERCHANT, Officer; DOW, Officer; MAYFIELD, Sergeant; THOMAS, Major, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-95-CV-116

- - - - - - - - - - December 10, 1998 Before DAVIS, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Robert Meadows, # 662193, appeals the summary judgment for the defendants in his civil rights suit filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Meadows argues that the defendants failed to protect him from harm at the hands of another inmate. Meadows claim for damages is not cognizable under § 1983. Edwards v. Balisok , 117 S. Ct. 1584, 1589 (1997). Accordingly, the summary judgment for the defendants is AFFIRMED for theNo. 97-41490 - 2 - reasons set forth by the district court. Meadows v. Clark , No. G-95-CV-116 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 25, 1997). Because Meadow's appeal lacks arguable merit, it is DISMISSED as frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 703 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 703

    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the 
    eligibility of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for 
 designation for participation in the visa waiver program for certain 
                     visitors to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 11, 2013

 Ms. Hirono (for herself and Mr. Hatch) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the 
    eligibility of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for 
 designation for participation in the visa waiver program for certain 
                     visitors to the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION FOR 
              DESIGNATION FOR PARTICIPATION IN VISA WAIVER PROGRAM FOR 
              CERTAIN VISITORS TO THE UNITED STATES.

    Section 217(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1187(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(12) Eligibility of certain region for designation as 
        program country.--The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 
        of the People's Republic of China--
                    ``(A) shall be eligible for designation as a 
                program country for purposes of this subsection; and
                    ``(B) may be designated as a program country for 
                purposes of this subsection if such region meets 
                requirements applicable for such designation in this 
                subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```