Name: John M. McManus

Title: Vice President- Environmental Service Company: American Electric Power Sign Date: 6/30/2010 Name: Scott W. Banach Title: Director, Project Engineering Company: Platt Environmental Services, Inc. Sign Date: 6/25/2010 Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date 

### General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 1 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010 Facility Information:

General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

7397 N. St. Rte. 7

Cheshire OH45620
Contact:Paul Jackson

Phone: 614-716-3278

Fax: 614-716-1252

Email: pmjackson@aep.com Testing Company:
Platt Environmental Services, Inc. 1520 Kensington Road

Suite 204

Oak Brook IL 60523
Contact:Scott Banach

Phone:630-521-9400

Fax: 630-521-9494

Email: sbanach@plattenv.com

Air Permit Number:
06-27-01-0056 Permitted Source ID/Name:
General James M. Gavin Unit 1 0627010056

Permitted Maximum Process Rate:
11936 mmBTU/hr Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:
11936 mmBTU/hr Target Process Test Rate
11936 mmBTU/hr

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram:
Babcock and Wilcox model UP-102 pulverized coal-fired, dry-bottom boiler having a nominal capacity of 11,936 mmBTU/hr, and controlled with a SCR, ESP and wet FGD.

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates. Industry/SCC/NAIS

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #: FRS #:

SCC / Description10100202 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal - Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Bituminous Coal)

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width
Stack 504 252 1008 4 0 6 0 0

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Sample

Points Comments Location Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 0 Stack Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 0 Stack O2 Method 3A O2 0 Stack Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 0 Stack

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 2 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 3 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010 Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location Stack - Method 26A Average
Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Test Date 3/10/2010 3/10/2010 3/10/2010

Run Start Time 9:51:00 AM 12:12:00 PM 2:05:00 PM

Run Finish Time 11:16:00 AM1:32:00 PM 3:24:00 PM
Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 47.978 51.061 48.904 49.314
Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 16.82 16.01 15.86 16.230 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 13.48 13.48 13.14 13.367
Carbon Dioxide, % 12.3 12.3 12.4 12.333 Oxygen, % 6.7 6.7 6.5 6.633 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 124.25 124.25 123.33 123.943 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3,650,383.73,644,149.1 3,578,354.03,624,295.60 0
Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 4,867,057.74,858,745.1 4,744,861.8 4,823,554.86 7 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.8 107.4 104.8 104.333
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2 Average
Run Number M26A-2 M26A-3 M26A1

Test Date 3/10/2010 3/10/2010 3/10/2010

Run Start Time 12:12:00 PM2:05:00 PM 9:51:00 AM

Run Finish Time 1:32:00 PM3:24:00 PM11:16:00 AM
Carbon Dioxide, % 12.3 12.4 12.3 12.333 Oxygen, % 6.7 6.5 6.7 6.633 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3672931 3606012 36876363,655,526.33 3
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000
Moisture, % 13.5 13.2 13.5 13.400 Fuel Type Coal - Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 4 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2 Average
Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Test Date 3/10/2010 3/10/2010 3/10/2010

Run Start Time 9:51:00 AM 12:12:00 PM 2:05:00 PM

Run Finish Time 11:16:00 AM1:32:00 PM 3:24:00 PM
Carbon Dioxide, % 12.3 12.3 12.4 12.333 Oxygen, % 6.7 6.7 6.5 6.633 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3687636 3672931 36060123,655,526.33 3
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000
Moisture, % 13.5 13.5 13.2 13.400 Fuel Type Coal - Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 5 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010 Emissions Summary

Process Run Data Location: Stack - Method 26A Compound: Hydrogen Chloride Average RunNumber M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3 Mass_mg 18 18 18 18.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.19E-02 1.12E-02 1.15E-02 0.012
Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride Average RunNumber M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3 Mass_mg 120 120 120 120.000 lb/mmBtuO2 7.94E-02 7.46E-02 7.68E-02 0.077

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 6 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010
Process Run Data

Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value
1 Bituminous Coal Burned 1103 1000 tons/ hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1100

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 7 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

1 Gross Load 1411 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1400

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 8 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

1 Total Excess Air 20.7 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 20

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 9 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

1 NH3 flow 850 gal/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 0

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 10 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

1 Sorbent Injection Rate 1.5 Tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1.5

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 11 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

1 Main Steam Temperature 1000 F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 12 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

1 Main Steam Pressure 2584 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 2600

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 13 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

2 Bituminous Coal Burned 1108 1000 tons/ hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1100

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 14 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

2 Gross Load 1411 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1400

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 15 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

2 Total Excess Air 20.54 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 20

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 16 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

2 NH3 flow 850 gal/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 0

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 17 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

2 Sorbent Injection Rate 1.21 Tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1.5

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 18 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

2 Main Steam Temperature 1001 F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 19 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

2 Main Steam Pressure 2604 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 2600

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 20 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

3 Bituminous Coal Burned 1111 1000 tons/ hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1100

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 21 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

3 Gross Load 1414 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1400

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 22 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

3 Total Excess Air 20.3 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 20

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 23 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

3 NH3 flow 850 gal/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 0

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 24 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

3 Sorbent Injection Rate 1.36 Tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1.5

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 25 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

3 Main Steam Temperature 1000 F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 26 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

3 Main Steam Pressure 2640 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 2600

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 27 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data 1 0 The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 0

Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value
1 CATALYTIC REDUCTION 850 nh3 flow 850

2 CATALYTIC REDUCTION 850 nh3 flow 850

3 CATALYTIC REDUCTION 850 nh3 flow 850

1 WET SCRUBBER - HIGH EFFICIENCY 1.5 Sorbent Injection Rate (tph) 1.5

2 WET SCRUBBER - HIGH EFFICIENCY 1.21 Sorbent Injection Rate (tph) 1.5

3 WET SCRUBBER - HIGH EFFICIENCY 1.36 Sorbent Injection Rate (tph) 1.5

1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 7 opacity (%) 10

2 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 7.8 opacity (%) 10

3 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 6.39 opacity (%) 10

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 28 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 29 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010
Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location Stack - Method 26A Average Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3
Test Date 3/10/2010 3/10/2010 3/10/2010 Run Start Time 9:51:00 AM12:12:00 PM 2:05:00 PM Run Finish Time 11:16:00 AM 1:32:00 PM 3:24:00 PM Net Traversing Points 16 16 16 Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.235 0.235 0.235 0.235 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1 1 1 1.000 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.66 28.66 28.66 28.660 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.89 1.88 1.82 1.863 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 48.508 51.643 50.204 50.118 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 53.83 54.00 61.63 56.487 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 47.978 51.061 48.904 49.314 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 206 206.8 195.8 202.867 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 9.70 9.73 9.22 9.550 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 16.82 16.01 15.86 16.230 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 13.48 13.48 13.14 13.367 Dry Mole Fraction 0.8652 0.8652 0.8686 0.866 Carbon Dioxide, % 12.3 12.3 12.4 12.333 Oxygen, % 6.7 6.7 6.5 6.633 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 81 81 81.1 81.033 Fuel Factor 1.15 1.15 1.16 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.24 30.24 30.24 30.240 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.19 29.05 29.12 29.120 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.500 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.70 28.70 28.70 28.700 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 124.25 124.25 123.33 123.943 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.9531128784 358020.945526822

507808 0.905057562

65526 0.935

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 58.55 58.45 57.08 58.027 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 1,385.442 1,385.442 1,385.442 1,385.442 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3,650,383.7 3,644,149.1 3,578,354.03,624,295.6 00 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 4,867,057.7 4,858,745.1 4,744,861.84,823,554.8 67 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.8 107.4 104.8 104.333 Percent Excess Air, % 45.6 45.6 43.6 44.933 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Round Duct Diameter, inches 504 504 504 Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0 Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0
Fw 10640 10640 1064010,640.000
Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 30 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2 Average Run Number M26A-2 M26A-3 M26A1
Test Date 3/10/2010 3/10/2010 3/10/2010 Run Start Time 12:12:00 PM 2:05:00 PM 9:51:00 AM Run Finish Time 1:32:00 PM 3:24:00 PM11:16:00 AM Carbon Dioxide, % 12.3 12.4 12.3 12.333 Oxygen, % 6.7 6.5 6.7 6.633 Fuel Factor 1.15 1.16 1.15 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3672931 3606012 36876363,655,526.3 33 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Moisture, % 13.5 13.2 13.5 13.400 Analyzer Make Servomex Servomex Servomex Analyzer Model 01440D1 01440D1 01440D114,400.000 Analyzer Serial Number 3951 3951 3951 3,951.000 Operating Range 25 25 25 25.000 Operating Units % % % No. Readings/Avg. 80 79 70 76.333 Calibration Set 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID CC203369- co2 CC203369-

co2 CC203369-

co2 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0 0.02 -0.02 0.000 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0.08 0.2 0 0.093 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID CC20938-co2 CC20938- co2CC20938-co2

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 9.95 9.95 9.95 9.950 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID CC203369- co2 CC203369-

co2 CC203369-

co2 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.02 0.01 0 0.010 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias 0.16 0.15 0.1 0.137 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0.08 0.05 0.1 0.077 Calibration Post High Cylinder ID CC20938-co2 CC20938- co2CC20938-co2

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 9.95 9.97 9.95 9.957 Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias 0 0.1 0 0.033 Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0 0.1 0 0.033 Cavg 12.3 12.4 12.3 12.333 Cavg Units %vd %vd %vd Cgas 12.3036 12.3925 12.2989 12.332 Cgas Units %vd %vd %vd Fuel Type Coal - Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous
Fw 10640 10640 1064010,640.000
Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000 Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000 Cgasw Units

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 31 of 31General James M. Gavin Unit 1- 8102

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2 Average Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3
Test Date 3/10/2010 3/10/2010 3/10/2010 Run Start Time 9:51:00 AM12:12:00 PM 2:05:00 PM Run Finish Time 11:16:00 AM 1:32:00 PM 3:24:00 PM Carbon Dioxide, % 12.3 12.3 12.4 12.333 Oxygen, % 6.7 6.7 6.5 6.633 Fuel Factor 1.15 1.15 1.16 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3687636 3672931 36060123,655,526.3 33 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Moisture, % 13.5 13.5 13.2 13.400 Analyzer Make Servomex Servomex Servomex Analyzer Model 01440D1 01440D1 01440D114,400.000 Analyzer Serial Number 3951 3951 3951 3,951.000 Operating Range 25 25 25 25.000 Operating Units % % % No. Readings/Avg. 80 80 79 79.667 Calibration Set 1 1 1 1.000 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID SA10353-o2SA10353-o2 SA10353-o2 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.08 0.03 0.1 0.070 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 -0.2 0.08 -0.040 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID CC20938-o2CC20938-o2 CC20938-o2 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 11.96 11.98 12.01 11.983 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias 0 0.08 0.2 0.093 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID SA10353-o2SA10353-o2 SA10353-o2 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.03 0.1 0.11 0.080 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias -0.2 0.08 0.12 0.000 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0.2 0.28 0.04 0.173 Calibration Post High Cylinder ID CC20938-o2CC20938-o2 CC20938-o2 Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 11.98 12.01 12.07 12.020 Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias 0.08 0.2 0.44 0.240 Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.08 0.12 0.24 0.147 Cavg 12.3 6.7 6.5 8.500 Cavg Units %vd %vd %vd Cgas 12.3118 6.6628 6.4191 8.465 Cgas Units %vd %vd %vd Fuel Type Coal - Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous
Fw 10640 10640 1064010,640.000
Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000 Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000 Cgasw Units

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 32 of 31