alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Triton Pacific Investment Corporation, Inc., (the “Company”)
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), we, Craig J. Faggen and Michael L. Carroll, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively,
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Dated: November 14, 2018 | By |  | /s/ Craig J. Faggen    
|------------------------ | -- |  | -----------------------
|                         |    |  | Craig J. Faggen        
|                         |    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                         |    |  |                        
|                         | By |  | /s/ Michael L. Carroll 
|                         |    |  | Michael L. Carroll     
|                         |    |  | Chief Financial Officer





58
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.56 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.17
AMENDMENT TO 
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment (this “Amendment”), dated as of February 9, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), is made by and between Windstream Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Windstream”) and Anthony W. Thomas (“Executive”).
WHEREAS, Windstream and Executive are parties to an employment agreement dated as of December 11, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”);
WHEREAS, prior to the Effective Date, the Company has granted equity awards with double trigger vesting provisions to Executive under the Windstream Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”); and
WHEREAS, as a condition of making equity grants with double trigger vesting provisions on and after the Effective Date, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Windstream has determined that Executive shall enter into this Amendment to increase the non-compete period contained in the Employment Agreement from one year to two years.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual agreements herein contained and Windstream’s grant of equity awards to Executive with double trigger vesting provisions under the Equity Incentive Plan on and after the Effective Date, Windstream and Executive agree as follows:   
1.    Section 1.12 of the Employment Agreement is hereby superseded and replaced in its entirety as set forth below: 
“1.12    “Non-Interference/Assistance Period” shall mean the period commencing with the Termination Date and ending on the second anniversary of the Termination Date.”
2.    Except as explicitly set forth herein, the Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect.
	
	
	WINDSTREAM HOLDINGS, INC.

	 

	By:  /s/ John P. Fletcher

	John P. Fletcher, Executive Vice President & General Counsel




	
	
	EXECUTIVE

	 

	/s/ Anthony W. Thomas
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EMS Find, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Rubakh, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| 1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 26, 2016

*/s/ Steve Rubakh*

 

By: Steve Rubakh

 

Chief Financial Officer |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Sierra Income Corporation, (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Seth Taube and
Richard T. Allorto, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |    |  |                            
|------------------ |  | -- |  | ---------------------------
|Dated: May 7, 2015 |  | By |  | /s/ Seth Taube             
|                   |  |    |  | Seth Taube                 
|                   |  |    |  | Chief Executive Officer    
|                   |  |   
|                   |  | By |  | /s/ Richard T. Allorto, Jr.
|                   |  |    |  | Richard T. Allorto, Jr.    
|                   |  |    |  | Chief Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.18 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, People & CUlture, JACKSONVILLE

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.28 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, dla, Marine Birthday

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 8304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3478]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, 
February 16, 2012 at 2:00 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
February 16, 2012 will be:
    Formal order of investigation;
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: February 9, 2012.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-3478 Filed 2-10-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patricio Dawson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), rendered June 26, 1989, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Brown, Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10193 Summary Calendar

MIGUEL SALDANA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ALLAN B. POLUNSKY; WAYNE SCOTT, Director; RONALD DREWRY; CRAIG A. RAINES, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:96-CV-274

- - - - - - - - - - July 10, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Miguel Saldana, Texas prisoner #669276, filed this civil rights lawsuit, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Allan Polunsky, Chairman, Texas Board of Criminal Justice; Wayne Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice; Ronald Drewry, Warden; and Craig A. Raines, Assistant Warden, alleging that the defendants instituted a policy that allows punishment of inmates without a prior determination of guilt through due process.No. 97-10193 - 2 - Saldana also asserts, for the first time, that the policy allows prison officials to inflict corporal punishment on inmates. Saldana admits that he does not challenge his custody classification. Saldana also admits that he received notice and hearings concerning his disciplinary charges and was found guilty. Saldana has not demonstrated that the policy is so deficient that the policy itself is a repudiation of constitutional rights.
See Thompkins v. Belt , 828 F.2d 298, 304 (5th Cir. 1987). The changes in Saldana’s conditions of confinement, resulting from the implementation of the policy, do not constitute an “atypical and significant hardship on [Saldana] in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” See Sandin v. Conner , 115 S. Ct. 2293, 2300 (1995). Further, prison authorities have discretion to place an inmate in segregated facilities pending investigation into charges of misconduct, provided that the inmate is given notice and an informal hearing within a reasonable time. See Hewitt v. Helms , 459 U.S. 460, 476 (1983). Accordingly, Saldana has not demonstrated the violation of a constitutional right, which is required to obtain relief under § 1983. Manax v.
McNamara , 842 F.2d 808, 812 (5th Cir. 1988). To the extent that Saldana is challenging the policy on behalf of other inmates, Saldana has no standing to assert the rights of other inmates for any deprivation they may have suffered. See Warth v. Seldin , 422 U.S. 490, 498-99 (1975)No. 97-10193 - 3 - (plaintiff must assert his own legal rights and interests and cannot rest his claim on the rights and interests of others). The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 7, 2003 Session

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JERRY BAXTER GRAVES

Appeal by Permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals

Criminal Court for Knox County No. 69593 Richard R. Baumgartner, Judge

No. E2001-00123-SC-R11-CD - Filed May 27, 2003

Janice M. Holder, J., concurring.

I agree thatthe judgmentof the Court of

CriminalAppeals should be affirmed. I write separately because I disagree with the majority ’ s conclusion that the trial court did not err in failing to grant the defendant ’ s pre-trial Rule 5.1(a) motion to dismiss the indictment and remand for a new preliminary hearing when a recording of the defendant ’ spreliminary hearing was not preserved. I would hold that in all cases in which the failure to record a preliminary hearing is brought to the attention of the trial court prior to trial, the appropriate remedy is to dismiss the indictment and remand for a new preliminary hearing thatis properly recorded. To so require will promote judicial economy and obviate subsequent review to determine if

the failure to comply withRule 5.1(a) constituted error.

In the present case, I would apply the non-constitutional harmless error standard to determine whetherthe trial court ’ sfailure to dismiss the indictmentand remand for a new preliminary hearing merits reversal, as there is no constitutional right to have one ’ s preliminary hearing recorded. Under this standard, reversal is not warranted unless the error complained ofmore probably than not affected the judgment to the defendant ’ s prejudice. See Tenn. R. Crim. P. 52(a) (stating that “ [n]o judgment of conviction shall be reversed on appeal except for errors which affirmatively appear to have affected the result ofthe trial on the merits ”); see also State v. Bowers
, 77 S.W.3d 776, 791 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001) (applying non-constitutional harmless error analysis to the trial court ’ s violation ofRule 30 of the Tennessee Rules of

CriminalProcedure).

Thedefendant argues thatbecause Richards ’ testimony at trial was differentfromhis testimony at the preliminary hearing, the lack of a recording hampered his ability to impeach Richards at trial. However, defense counsel, who was present at the preliminary hearing, illustrated discrepancies in Richards ’ testimony at trial without the benefit ofa recording ofthe preliminary hearing. Therefore, no prejudice to the defendant was shown. Moreover, remanding the case for a new preliminary hearing would not assure the defense that the same discrepancies would occur in Richards ’ testimony. Thus, because the failure to properly record the preliminary hearing did not more probably than not affect the judgmentto the defendant ’ sprejudice, I would holdthatreversal inthis case is notwarranted.

Page 1In summary, I disagree with the majority ’ s conclusion that the trial court did not err in failing to

grant the defendant ’ s pre-trial Rule 5.1(a) motion to dismiss the indictment and remand for a new preliminary hearing. However, I would holdthatthe error inthis case was harmless.

____________________________ JANICE M. HOLDER, JUSTICE

Page 2
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated February 25, 2016, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-208401) of Smart Trust 225,
comprising Smart Trust, Dynamic Sector Income Trust, Series 14.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


February 25, 2016
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE: A.H.C.S., INC.,

Appellant

______________________ 

2018-1013

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No. 

86782221.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JAMES A. KNOWLTON, Law Office of James A Knowlton, Basalt, CO, argued for appellant. 

 THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, 

argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by

THOMAS W. KRAUSE, CHRISTINA J. HIEBER, MARY BETH 

WALKER. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 
 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and 

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 November 13, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court