From: Christopher Bolduc [mailto:cabolduc@lbl.gov]

Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 8:24 PM

To: Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com

Cc: Richard Parker; Aaron.Meyers@cooperindustries.com;

adelaski@standardsasap.org; ahofmann@publicpower.org; Aris Marantan;

artrosenfeld@gmail.com; august.esch@gmail.com; BermanEconomics@gmail.com; Brian

Coffey; bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; bsmith@federalpacific.com; Caitlin Johnson;

carlos.gaytan@ge.com; carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com; chad.kennedy@us.schneider

‐ electric.com; charlied@uss.org; chuck.simmons@pgnmail.com; Cla_Silcox@nema.org;

cstephens@neea.org; Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; dave.millure@metglas.com;

DYoung@energy

‐ solution.com; eduardorobles@eaton.com; gbf1@pge.com;

gjrosenquist@lbl.gov; greg.coulter405@gmail.com; James.Lass@cleco.com;

Jennifer.Tiedeman@hq.doe.com; Jeremiah.Freeman@ee.doe.gov;

jerry.corkran@cooperindustries.com; jerry.schoen@aksteel.com; jhodg e@howard

‐

ind.com ; Jim.creevy@nema.org; Jim.Raba@ee.doe.gov; jmauer@standardsasap.org;

Joh_Caskey@nema.org; john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov; jrossetti@mlgw.org;

kcoughlin@lbl.gov; kwinder@mleainc.com; maheshsampat@bellsouth.net;

mark.stoering@xcelenergy.com; Matthew Nardotti; mhyland@appanet.org; Michael

Rivest; mwaltner@nrdc.org; Paul.Ryan@hitmet.com; phil@pjharter.com;

phopkinson@hvolt.com; pkumar@publicpower.org; Raymond.Polinski@atimetals.com;

rgreeson@federalpacific.com; rick.anderson@faypwc.com; robert.saint@nreca.coop;

rroy@nrdc.org; ScottB@lvmetals.com; snadel@aceee.org; srosenstock@eei.org;

tballo@earthjustice.org; Teckman@nwcouncil.org; thomas.patzner@us.schneider

‐ electric.com; vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com; Zhimei Luo

Subject: Re: Efficiency Level between 0 and 1

Mr. Petersen,

We can add an add itional cu stom EL to the LCC results for DL 1 at 99.13%. These

results will be prepared for the next meeting.

Thank you,

‐ Chris

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:58 AM, <Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com> wrote:

>

> Mr. Parker,

>

> At the end of our last committee meeting, Mr. Ro senstock r equested an

> additional Efficiency Level be considered between 0 and 1.

>

> I would like to emphasize our support of his request and inquire as to

> whether or not this analysis will be conducted?

>

> I would propose an Efficiency Level of 0.6, which would be 99.13% fo r

> a 50K VA transformer, be included in the analysis for consideration by

> the committee.

>

> Is it feasible to have this analysis conducted for the next meeting?

>

> Regards,

>>

> Eric Petersen

> Director

> Customer Technical Services and Research AK Steel Corporation

>

> Confidentiality Notice

> This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to

> which it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary, or

> otherwise private information.

> If you are not the named add ressee, yo u are not authorized to read,

> print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If

> you have received this message in error, please notify the sender

> immediately by e

‐ mail and delete all copies of the message.

>

‐‐

‐‐‐‐

Chris Bolduc

Energy Eff iciency St andards Group

Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

t. 416

‐ 535

‐ 7546 c. 647

‐ 832

‐ 4021