alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

of Periodic Report
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

I, Seth Taube, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sierra Income Corporation (the Company);

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The Companys other certifying officer(s)
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the Company and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The Companys other
certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 7, 2013



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Seth Taube               
|Seth Taube                   
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
Defense Intelligence Agency

ATTN: FAC-2C (FOIA)

7400 Pentagon

Washington, DC 20301-7400

________________________________________________________________________________________

THIRD PARTY RELEASE of INFORMATION AUTHORIZATION

I, ___________________________________________________, authorize the Defense Intelligence 

Agency 

to release the following information concerning myself:

to the following Third Party (name, address, contact/phone/email) (please submit a separate form for each 

Party, if authorizing more than one party):

Subscribed and sworn before me,

This ______ day of ________________, 20______.

/Foreign notaries are not /

/accepted. If outside the U.S., /

/ Notary must be before U.S. /

/Consulate Personnel/

________________________________________________________

Notary Public

My Commission Expires ____________________________________

ORIGINAL Stamp or Seal

Required Here

I certify that I am the person named above. I understand that any falsification of this statement is punishable, under the 

provisions of 18 U.S.C. Section 1001, by a fine of not more than $10,000, or by imprisonment of not more than five 

years, or both and that requesting or obtaining any record(s) under false pretenses is punishable under the provisions 

of 5 U.S.C. § 552a(i)(3) by a fine of not more than $5000.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determ ined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 18, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60542 Summary Calendar SALIM AHMED ALI,

Peti tioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

---------------------------------------------------------- Peti tion for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A79 007 925

---------------------------------------------------------- Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Salim Ahmed Ali, a native and cit izen of Pakistan, peti tions fo r review of th e order of th e Board of Im

migration Appeals (BIA) adopti ng and affirming th e immigrat io n judge’s (IJ) decision denying his application for withholding of removal, filed pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3). Because th e BIA adopted th e IJ’s decision, th e IJ’s decision is th e final agency determ inat io n fo r judicial review. S

ee Mikha el v. INS , 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). We will uphold the2

finding that an alien is not eligible fo r wit hholding of removal if that find ing is supported by substantial evidence. S

ee Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994). The substantial evidence standard require s that the IJ’s deci sio n be based on the record evidence and that the decision be substantially reasonable. Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS, 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). Under this standard, th e IJ’s determ

inat io n will be affirmed unless th e “evidence com pels a contrary conclusion.” Id. Our review of th e record reveals that th e IJ’s decision was substantially reasonable. Carbajal-Gonzalez , 78 F.3d at 197. As determined by the IJ, other than the affidavits of his brothers, Ali failed to produce documentary evidence supporting his claims that he was (1) forced to pay bribes, (2) targeted fo r wri ti ng and publishing anti-government articles, (3) arrested by th e police, and (4) hospitalized for injuries inflict ed by government agents. Ali also failed t o establish by objective evidence that h e was a member of the Mohajir Quami Movement (MQM). A ccordi ngly, even if membe rs of MQM still face persecution, Ali has not demonstrated that he would be targeted as a member of that group. Moreover, accepting Ali’s testi mo ny at face value, he further fails to demonstrate that the alleged iso lat ed incidents of mist reatment establish a “clear probability” that he would be persecuted upon his return to Pakistan. This court has held that similar allegations of mistreatment do not rise to th e level of persecution. S ee, e.g., Fleurinor v. INS, 585 F.2d 129, 132 (5th Cir. 1978). Ali also admit ted that his mo th er has remained in th e same neighborhood wit hout incident. Because the evidence does not com

pel a contrary conclusion, Carbajal-Gonzalez , 78 F.3d at 197, th e peti tion fo r review is DENIED.
#### Commonwealth *vs.*Steven F. Davis.

No. 95-P-720.

July 30, 1996.

*Larceny.*

The defendant was convicted of larceny of property with a value in excess of $250, G. L. c. 266, § 30(1). He argues that the judge erred in denying his motion for a required finding of not guilty, based on what he claims is a failure of proof of two elements of the offense, the intent to steal, and an asportation, or taking away, of the allegedly stolen merchandise. The evidence against the defendant was that he removed a “multimedia kit,” valued in excess of $250, from the shelves of a Lechmere store at the Cambridge Galería and tore off the magnetic sticker that would, unless demagnetized at a cash register, sound an alarm if the defendant went through the security stanchions located beyond the registers. (He was being secretly watched by security officers through a closed-circuit television system.) After hiding the magnetic sticker behind other merchandise, he walked around the sales floor passing several cash registers, and then walked through the security stanchions that separated the sales floor from an open hallway or access area containing escalators leading to and from other levels within the Lechmere store and to the garage or to the sidewalk. He proceeded within the access area to a pay-phone and picked up the receiver twice without placing a call. At that point he was apprehended by Lechmere security officers. He had no credit cards, and the cash on his person amounted to less than three dollars.

Although the defendant had not left the confines of the Lechmere store, an intent to steal could properly be inferred from his having tom off the magnetic sticker, hidden it behind other merchandise, and carried goods for which he had no means of paying past the cash registers and the alarm stanchions into the unsecured hallway area giving unimpeded access to the garage and the outdoors. *Commonwealth*v. *Balboni,*26 Mass. App. Ct. 750, 752 (1989). The weight of authority holds that taking goods beyond a store’s premises is not a necessary precondition to a conviction of larceny. See *Groomes*v. *United States,*155 A.2d 73, 75 (D.C. 1959); *People*v. *Baker,*365 Ill. 328, 332 (1937); *Lee*v. *State,*59 Md. App. 28 (1984); *People*v. *Olivo,*52 N.Y.2d 309, 318-320 (1981); *People*v. *Britto,*93 Misc. 2d 151, 154-155 (N.Y. Crim. Ct. 1978); *Welch*v. *Commonwealth,*15 Va. App. 518, 524 (1992); *State*v. *Grant,*135 Vt. 222, 224 (1977). See also *In re Timothy,*442 A.2d 887, 890 (R.I. 1982). Compare *State*v. *Richard,*216 Neb. 832, 834-835 (1984). The same sequence of behavior suffices to establish the element of asportation, which only required that the defendant remove the stolen goods from the store’s control to his own. *Commonwealth*v. *Fielding,*371 Mass. 97, 117 (1976). *Commonwealth*v. *Flowers,*1 Mass. App. Ct. 415, 418-419 (1973). This was done when the defendant transported the *902multimedia kit beyond the store’s security perimeter to the unsecured access area, if not before.

*Seth H. Hochbaum*for the defendant.

*Daniel O. Tracy,*Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Exhibit


EXHIBIT 10.24






FORMULA FOR DETERMINING 2016 TARGET PERFORMANCE SHARE UNIT
AWARDS TO BE ISSUED TO NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The target number of performance share units to be issued to each Named Executive Officer listed below for 2016 will be determined in accordance with the following formula:


	
					
	2016 Target Number PSU Awards
	=
	Base Salary
as of 1/1/16
	x
	Long‐Term Incentive Target listed below

	Average closing price of Ameren Corporation Common Stock on The New York Stock Exchange for each trading day in December 2015








	
		
	NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER
	LONG-TERM INCENTIVE
TARGET AS PERCENT OF BASE SALARY

	Baxter
	350%

	Lyons
	195%

	Nelson
	160%

	Moehn
	180%

	Mark
	170%

	Diya
	140%

	Cole
	140%

	Steinke
	100%
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.18 MB)

Tags:DSCC, dla, Massalin, Missing Person, columbus, police, Officer

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Chefs Warehouse, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to
be designed under our
supervision, to ensure
that material information
relating to the
registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by
others within those
entities, particularly
during the period in which
this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    [Reserved](c)
    
    Evaluated the
effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure
controls and procedures
and presented in this
report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered
by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report
any change in the
registrants internal
control over financial
reporting that occurred
during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth
quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has
materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to
materially affect, the
registrants internal
control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 (a)
    
    All significant
deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal
control over financial
reporting which are
reasonably likely to
adversely affect the
registrants ability to
record, process, summarize
and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves
management or other
employees who have a
significant role in the
registrants internal
control over financial
reporting.
 Date:  September 9, 2011
    /s/ Kenneth ClarkKenneth ClarkChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of ScripsAmerica, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Schneiderman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Robert Schneiderman

Robert Schneiderman

Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 20, 2014



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1935/2005

of 24 November 2005         

fixing the maximum export refund on common wheat in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 18 to 24 November 2005, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005, the maximum refund on exportation of common wheat shall be 5,00 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 November 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 November 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 15.

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
Exhibit 32.1

                            NETWORKING PARTNERS, INC.
                              A Nevada corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Networking  Partners,  Inc.
("Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Enzo
Taddei,  Chief Executive Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentication,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed from  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: May 20, 2013                          /s/ Enzo Taddei
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Enzo Taddei
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)
10-Q

|     |
|-----|
|     |  |
| Re: | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |

|     |                                                                                                                                        |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|     |                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Trust. |

|                                                                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                          |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.Trustee for Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust |
| By:                                                                                      | /s/ Sarah Newell |
|                                                                                     | Sarah NewellVice President |
#### Harry B. MALPUSS, Appellant, v. Joseph W. SANFORD, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Appellee.

No. 9337.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 13, 1940.

No appearance was entered for appellant.

Lawrence S.. Camp, U. S. Atty., and Harvey H. Tisinger and Jas. T. Manning, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before SIBLEY, HUTCHESON, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02

            CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-98812 and 333-11279) of our report dated September 20,
1996 (related to the consolidated financial statements of UniCAD, Inc. 
not presented seperately herein) included in Cooper & Chyan Technology,
Inc.'s Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


Deloitte & Touche
Ottawa, Canada
March 27, 1997