alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.17 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, Defense Supply Center Richmond, Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Office, community relations, People and Culture, diversity

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2106/2005

of 21 December 2005         

amending Regulation (EC) No 1725/2003 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards International Accounting Standard (IAS) 39

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards (1), and in particular Article 3(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1725/2003 International Accounting Standard (IAS) 39 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

Each company shall apply the amendments to IAS 39 as set out in the Annex to this Regulation as from the commencement date of its 2006 financial year at the latest.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 2005.

For the Commission

Charlie McCREEVY            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 243, 11.9.2002, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 261, 13.10.2003, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1910/2005 (OJ L 305, 24.11.2005, p. 4).

(3)OJ L 363, 9.12.2004, p. 1.

(4)OJ L 299, 16.11.2005, p. 45.

----

ANNEX

International Accounting Standard (IAS) 39 is amended as follows:

INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Reproduction allowed within the European Economic Area. All existing rights reserved outside the EEA, with the exception of the right to reproduce for the purposes of personal use or other fair dealing. Further information can be obtained from the IASB at www.iasb.org

----
* Chief Judge King is recused and did not participate in this

matter. REVISED 12/15/99

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 97-20948

_______________

JOYCE RILEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL; DR. BRANISLAV RADOVANCEVIC; O. HOWARD FRAZIER, M.D.;

SURGICAL ASSOCIATES OF TEXAS, P.A.; UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON; BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE; TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE; and EDWARD K. MASSIN, M.D.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

_________________________ (Opinion November 15, 1999, 5 Cir., ___ F.3d ___)

November 15, 1999

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE,
EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS , BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. *BY THE COURT:

The internal polici es of this court provide for the

p re-circulation, to all non-recused active judges, of a proposed

panel opinion that will create a circuit split. Those policies

also allow any active judge to request, before the opinion is

issued, a poll on whether the case should be reheard en banc after

the opinion is issued.

A member of the court in regular active service having

requested a poll pursuant to that policy, and a majority of the

judges in regular active service having voted in favor of granting

rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en

banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk

will specify a briefing schedule for the fi ling of supplemental

briefs.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.03 MB)

Tags:Material Maintenance Squadron, War Reserve Material, Department of Defense, U.S. Air Force, Ramstein Air Base, USAFE-AFAFRICA, NATO

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
BANK OF AMERICA

                                                                                                   Amendment to Documents

AMENDMENTNO. 1 TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT

RECITALS

                     A.        The Bank and the Borrower entered into a certain Business Loan Agreement dated as of August         23, 1999 (the "Agreement").

                      B.        The Bank and the Borrower desire to amend the Agreement.

AGREEMENT

                      **1.  Definitions**.  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the         meaning given to them in the Agreement.

                      **2. Amendments**.  The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

                          2.1  A new Paragraph 1.5(b) is added to the Agreement, which reads in its entirety as follows:

        "(b)The IBOR Rate plus one and three-quarters percentage points (1.75%)."

                         2.2  A new Paragraph 2.5(b) is added to the Agreement, which reads in its entirety as follows:

                           "(b)       The IBOR Rate plus one and three-quarters percentage points (1.75%)."

                         2.3  A new Paragraph 3.3 is added to the Agreement, which reads in its entirety as follows:

           "3.3   IBOR Rate.  The election of IBOR Rates shall be subject to the following terms and         requirements:

        (a)  The interest period during which the IBOR Rate will be in effect will be oneyear or less. The last day of the interest period will be determined by the Bankusing the practices of the offshore dollar inter-bank market.

                                  (b)   Each IBOR Rate Portion will be for an amount not less than the following:                           (i)   for interest periods of 91 days or longer, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000).
                 (ii)  for interest periods of between 30 days and 90 days, One Million Dollars($1,000,000).
                (iii) for interest periods of between 2 days and 29 days, an amount which, whenmultiplied by the number of days in the applicable interest period, is not less than thirty million (30,000,000) dollar-days.
                 (iv)  for interest periods of one day, Fifteen Million Dollars ($15,000,000).

         (c) The Borrower may not elect an IBOR Rate with respect to any principal amountwhich is scheduled to be repaid before the last day of the applicable interest period.

        (d) The “IBOR Rate” means the interest rate determined by the followingformula, rounded upward to the nearest 1/100 of one percent. (All amounts in the calculation will be determined by the Bank as of the first day of the interestperiod.)

  IBOR Rate = IBOR Base Rate
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 12, 2018

No. 04-18-00328-CR

Carlos Omar Martinez RIVERA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 05-CRS-324

Honorable Alex William Gabert, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The 

appellant’s brief is due October 1, 2018.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of September, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 972 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services replacing ICD– 

9 with ICD–10 in implementing the HIPAA code set standards. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2013 

Mr. COBURN (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BOOZMAN, and Mr. PAUL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

replacing ICD–9 with ICD–10 in implementing the 

HIPAA code set standards. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cutting Costly Codes 

5 Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 972 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING REPLACEMENT OF ICD–9 WITH ICD–10 

2 IN IMPLEMENTING HIPAA CODE SET STAND3 ARDS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

5 Human Services may not implement, administer, or en6 force the regulations issued on January 16, 2009 (74 Fed. 

7 Reg. 3328), the regulation issued on September 5, 2012 

8 (77 Fed. Reg. 54664), or any similar regulation, insofar 

9 as any such regulation provides for the replacement of 

10 ICD–9 with ICD–10 as a standard for code sets under 

11 section 1173(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

12 1320d–2(c)) and section 162.1002 of title 45, Code of 

13 Federal Regulations. 

14 (b) GAO REPORT ON ICD–9 REPLACEMENT.— 

15 (1) STUDY.—The Comptroller General of the 

16 United States, in consultation with stakeholders in 

17 the medical community, shall conduct a study to 

18 identify steps that can be taken to mitigate the dis19 ruption on health care providers resulting from a re20 placement of ICD–9 as such a standard. 

21 (2) REPORT.—Not later than 6 months after 

22 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comp23 troller General shall submit to each House of Con24 gress a report on such study. Such report shall in25 clude such recommendations respecting such replace26 ment and such legislative and administrative steps 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 972 IS

1 as may be appropriate to mitigate the disruption re2 sulting from such replacement as the Comptroller 

3 General determines appropriate. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

m 99-50346

_______________

DIANA SALTZMAN,

PRESIDENT EMERITUS OF ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONALS

IN POSITIONS OF LEADERSHIP IN EDUCATION,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES;

GRAYDON LOVE,

PRESIDENT OF ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONALS IN POSITIONS OF LEADERSHIP IN EDUCATION,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES;

BETTY WILLIAMS,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES;

MARY JUDITH LUSTED,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES;

EVELYN RANUM,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES;

LAURA SALAZAR,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES;

JUDY ZIMMER,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES;

CARLOS MONREAL,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES;

ROSEANNE GASTON-RICO,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES;

MELISSA RAMOS,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES;

CYNTHIA GARDNER,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES;

SANDRA SUTTON,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES;

JURETTA MARSHALL,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES;

AND

BLANCO GUAJARDO,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

T.A. (TONY) GUAJARDO,

Appellant,

VERSUS

SAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT;

THOMAS C. LOPEZ,
2

PRESIDENT, BOARD OF EDUCATION;

SYLVIA WARD,

VICE-PRESIDENT, BOARD OF EDUCATION;

JAMES A. HOWARD,

SECRETARY, BOARD OF EDUCATION;

PAUL TALAMANTEZ,

ASSISTANT SECRETARY, BOARD OF EDUCATION;

CONNIE ROCHA,

MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION;

JULIAN TREVINO,

MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION;

MARY ESTHER BERNAL,

MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION;

IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(SA-95-CV-1131)

_________________________

April 6, 2000

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We have reviewed the briefs, the applicable

law, and pertinent portions of the record and

have heard the arguments of counsel. We find

no reversible error in the findings and

conclusions of the district court. The

judgment is AFFIRMED on the basis of the

district court’s opinion.

 

*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has

determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4829

_____________________________
D ENZEL D YWAN W ILLIAMS ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

— Original Jurisdiction.

October 23, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
D ENIED

.
L EWIS , B.L. T HOMAS , and R OBERTS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Bruce Miller, Public Defender, Pensacola; Kelly M. Richards, Assistant Public Defender, Pensacola ; for Petitioner

.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Robert Qu entin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee; Alvin B. Myers III
, Assistant State Attorney, Pensacola ; for Respondent

.
10-Q





Exhibit 32.1


November 12, 2019


Via EDGAR


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F. Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





Re:Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Ladies and Gentlemen:


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2019 (the "Report") of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust (the “Trust”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, not in her individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Trust.

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. In giving the foregoing certifications, the undersigned has relied to the extent she considers reasonable on information provided to her by Chesapeake Energy Corporation.





The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.Trustee for Chesapeake Granite Wash TrustBy:/s/ Monika RusinMonika RusinVice President
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40851 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ELVIS EDEN CASTRO-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-2678-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Elvis Eden Castro-Rodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000863832
<NAME>                              GEODYNE INST/PENS ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP P-5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                   217,441
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            180,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         398,350
<PP&E>                                 9,855,735
<DEPRECIATION>                         9,018,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,235,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             1,235,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1,235,321
<SALES>                                  856,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         862,531
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            309,160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          553,371
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      553,371
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             553,371
<EPS-BASIC>                                 4.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>