alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT 

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement No.
33-93192 and  Registration  Statement No. 333-09731 of DenAmerica Corp. on Forms
S-8,  and the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statement  No.
333-07019 of  DenAmerica  Corp.  on Form S-3 of our report dated March 27, 1998,
appearing in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K of DenAmerica  Corp.  for the year
ended December 31, 1997.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP.
Phoenix, Arizona

April 13, 1998
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.44 MB)

Tags:fort hood, EPSC, DLA Energy , ENERGY

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.26 MB)

Tags:DSCC, dla, columbus, distracted Driving, land and maritime, News, Sports

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned officer of Mascot Properties, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/David Dreslin David Dreslin Chief Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer  February 3, 2012
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent.

v.

S ONG WAN G

,
Appellant

. No. 85283

- 3

- I

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

P ER C URIAM

— Song Wang appeals a trial court order denying his postconv i ction

motion for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing

. His court

- appointed attorney has filed a

motion to withdraw on the ground that there is no basis for a good faith argument on

review. Pursuant to State v. Theobald , 78 Wn.2d 184, 470 P.2d 188 (1970), and

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), the motion

to withdraw must:

[1] b e accompanied by a brief referring to anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal. [ 2 ] A copy of counsel’s brief should be furnished the indigent and [ 3 ] time allowed him to raise any points that he chooses; [ 4 ] the court

— not counsel

— then proceeds, after a full examination of all the proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.

Theobald , 78 Wn.2d at 185 (quoting Anders , 386 U.S. at 744) (a lterations in original)

. This procedure has been followed. Wang ’s counsel on appeal filed a brief with

the motion to withdraw. Wang was served with a copy of the brief

, and informed of his

right to file a statement of additional grounds for review

. Wang filed a supplemental

brief

.No. 85283

- 3

- I / 2

- 2

- The material facts are accurately set forth in counsel’s brief in support of the

motion to withdraw. The court has reviewed the briefs filed in this court and has

independently reviewed the entire record. The court specific ally considered the

following potential issue s raised by counsel: (1) whether the trial court violated W ang ’s

right to due process when it decided his motion for postconviction DNA t esting without

obtaining a response from the State or holding a hearing an d ( 2 ) whether the trial court

erred by denying Wang’s motion without reviewing the entire trial record. The court also

specifically considered the following issues raised by Wang: (1) whether the trial court

erred in denying his motion for postconviction DNA testing on its merits and (2) whether

a new trial is required because the trial court in Wang’s direct appeal failed to read the

jury instructions aloud.

The issue s raise d are wholly frivolous. The motion to withdraw is granted and

the ap peal is dismissed.

FOR THE COURT:
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-33862 of Prodeo  Technologies,  Inc. (formerly known as Sitek, Inc.) on Form
S-8 of our report dated June 30, 2000 (which  report  expresses  an  unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory  paragraph relating to the development stage
status of Prodeo  Technologies,  Inc.)  appearing in this Annual  Report on Form
10-K of Prodeo Technologies, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2000.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
July 13, 2000
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0467

_____________________________ A HMAD R ASHAD W ALKER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Thomas V. Dannheisser , Judge

. March 27, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , W INOKUR , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Laurel Cornel l Niles, Assistant Public Defender
, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody , Attorney General, Tabitha Herrera and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallah assee , for Appellee.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.69 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, dla, People and Culture, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report
of Mojo Data Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2017, as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Spiteri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: September 6, 2018 | By: | /s/ Joseph Spiteri                                
|----------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Joseph Spiteri                                    
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer, Mojo Data Solutions, Inc.

| |  | 
| |  |
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 26, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40480

Summary Calendar

LARRY MARTIN ROCHE

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; UNKNOWN

TEEMS, Employee of CMC; PEGGY UNKNOWN, Employee of CMC; JOHN

DOE, 1, Director of University of Texas Medical Branch; JOHN DOE, II,

Medical Manager for UTMB, Estelle Unit; JOHN DOE, III, Medical Manager

for UTMB, Powledge Unit; JOHN DOE, IV, Director of Correctional

Management Care

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:05-CV-280

Before WIENER, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-AppellantLarry Martin Roche, Texas prisoner # 1079651, appeals

the denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, wherein he sought relief from a

judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit for failure to exhaust
No. 06-40480

2

administrative remedies. Roche contends that the magistrate judge abused her

discretion by denying his Rule 60(b) motion, insisting that he had exhausted the

remedies that were available to him. Alternatively, he asserts that the

exhaustion requirement should have been excused, because prison officials

prevented him from filing timely grievances.

Roche’s appeal from the denial of his Rule 60(b) motion does not bring up

the underlying judgment for review. In re Ta Chi Navigation (Panama) Corp.

S.A., 728 F.2d 699, 703 (5th Cir. 1984). We review the magistrate judge’s denial

of Roche’s Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion. See Warfield v. Byron, 436

F.3d 551, 555 (5th Cir. 2006). Roche's Rule 60(b) motion did not indicate the

statutory basis for reconsideration, and did he raise any new issues in the

motion. Roche has not demonstrated that the magistrate judge abused her

discretion by denying his Rule 60(b) motion. See Matter of Colley, 814 F.2d 1008,

1010-11 (5th Cir. 1987).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.68

                        ASSIGNMENT OF VERTICAL CLUB LEASE

                                 APRIL 15, 1998



<PAGE>   2

RECORDING REQUESTED BY

AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO

NAME:   The Sports Club Company, Inc.

ADDRESS:       11100 Santa Monica Boulevard
               Suite 300
               Los Angeles, California 90025
               Attention:  Real Estate Department

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                               ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation having an address at 9336 Civic Center Drive, Beverly Hills,
California, hereby assigns to THE SPORTS CLUB COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
having an address at 11100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Los Angeles, California, all
right, Title and interest of Hilton Hotels Corporation in and to that certain
Amended and Restated Net Operating Lease dated as of March 26, 1985, by and
among HIRSCHFELD REALTY CLUB CORPORATION and 328 E. 61 CORP., as landlord, and
VERTICAL FITNESS AND RACQUET CLUB, LTD., as tenant; Hilton Hotels Corporation is
successor to said tenant.

        Said Amended and Restated Net Operating Lease is evidenced by a
Memorandum of Lease and Restrictive Covenants dated as of March 26, 1985 and
recorded on April 16, 1985 in New York County Office of the Register of the City
of New York, at Reel 898, Page 239.

        By accepting this Assignment, The Sports Club Company hereby assumes all
obligations of the tenant under said Amended and Restated Net Operating Lease.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Hilton Hotels Corporation has executed this
Assignment in form proper and sufficient in law to bind it, as of the 15th day
of April, 1998.

                                            HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION,
                                            a Delaware corporation

                                            By: /s/ Richard P. Barrier
                                               ---------------------------------

                                              Its: Vice President
                                                  ------------------------------

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

THE SPORTS CLUB COMPANY, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

By: /s/ David M. Talla
    -------------------------------------
   Its: CEO
        ---------------------------------
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER

PURSUANTTO 18 USC. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

** **

In connection withthe report on Form 10-Q of Skajaquoda Group, inc., for the quarterlyperiod ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, I, Einar Agustsson, do hereby certify, pursuantto 18 USC. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)  This reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  Theinformation contained in this report fairly represents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the periodcovered by this report and results of operations of the registrant for theperiod covered by this report.

 

 

Date: May 14, 2012

 

 

/s/ Einar Agustsson

Einar Agustsson

Chief FinancialOfficer

 

 

This certificationaccompanies this report pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or afterthe date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by 906 has been provided to the registrantand will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.98
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT 
(Three-Year “Cliff” Period of Restriction; No Code 162(m) Goals)
MetLife, Inc. confirms that, on [grant date] (the “Grant Date”), it granted you, [name], [number] Restricted Stock Units.  Your Restricted Stock Units are subject to the terms and conditions of the MetLife, Inc. 2015 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) and this Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (this “Agreement”), which includes the Award Agreement Supplement (the “Supplement”).  Please note that the Supplement includes terms for forfeiture of your Restricted Stock Units under some circumstances.
Standard Terms.  
(a)  These terms are the “Standard Terms” and will apply to your Restricted Stock Units except in so far as Sections S-2 (“Change of Status”), S-3 (“Change of Control”), or S-16 (“Restrictive Covenants”) apply.  If Shares are paid to you, you will receive evidence of ownership of those Shares.
(b)  The Period of Restriction for your Restricted Stock Units will begin on the Grant Date and end on the third anniversary of the Grant Date.  Each of your Restricted Stock Units will be due and payable in the form of Shares after the conclusion of the Period of Restriction, at the time specified in Section S-8 (“Timing of Payment”).
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, MetLife, Inc. has caused this agreement to be offered to you, and you have accepted this Agreement by the electronic means made available to you.
#### Cherie Kerpen, Respondent, v Kenneth Kerpen, Appellant.

In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (De Maro, J.), dated February 14, 1989, as granted that branch of the plaintiff wife’s motion which was to fix arrears in child support and maintenance due pursuant to a pendente lite award in the principal sum of $5,500.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well established that voluntary payments made by a parent for the benefit of his or her children and not pursuant to a court order may not be credited against amounts owing under such order *(see, Horne v Horne,*22 NY2d 219; *O’Brien v O’Brien,*136 AD2d 531; *Fabrizio v Fabrizio,*125 AD2d 634; *Soltow v Soltow,*47 AD2d 652). The trial court properly refused to credit the husband with voluntary payments made *497on behalf of the children for camp and clothing and on behalf of the wife for "club and other items” towards the sum of money owing under the pendente lite order.

There is no merit to the husband’s claim that he ought not be required to make payments for the two girls when they are not with their mother, as the wife’s expenditures for each child are unevenly distributed throughout the year and the suspension of support payments for a brief period when the children are not with her would be inequitable *(see, Frank v Frank,*65 AD2d 599). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.