alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the quarterly report of ShopEye, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 for the period ended November 30, 2011
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Ethelinda Corpuz, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

August 7, 2013                          /s/ Ethelinda Corpuz
                                        --------------------
                                        Ethelinda Corpuz, President, Principal
                                        Executive Officer, Principal Financial
                                        and Accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered August 13, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00267-CR

No. 05-13-00268-CR

No. 05-13-00269-CR

CHRISTOPHER JAMES RYALS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F05-18864-U, F12-40687-U, F12-41706-U

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s August 5, 2013 motion to extend time to file his brief. 

In the motion, counsel states the record is not complete. The Court has reviewed the record 

before it and determined the following.

 In cause no. 05-13-00267-CR, it appears a plea hearing was conducted on November 2, 

2005 and a punishment hearing was conducted on January 19, 2006. The records of these 

hearings have not been filed, and the Court cannot determine from the clerk’s record who 

recorded the hearings.

 In cause no. 05-13-00268-CR, a plea hearing was conducted on June 20, 2012. The 

docket sheet contained in the clerk’s record reflects that Winnie Lacy recorded the

hearing.
 In all three cases, a hearing was conducted on February 13, 2013. The reporter’s record 

of this hearing has been filed.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the 

following:

 As to cause no. 05-13-00267-CR, (1) whether hearings were conducted on November 2, 

2005 and January 19, 2006; (2) if hearings were conducted on those dates, whether the 

hearings were recorded; (3) if the hearings were recorded, the name of the court 

reporter(s) who recorded the hearings; (4) whether the notes are available and can be 

transcribed; (5) if the notes are available, the date by which the records will be filed; and 

(6) if the notes are not available or cannot be transcribed, whether appellant is at fault for 

the loss or destruction of the notes and whether the parties can agree on a substituted 

record.

 As to cause no. 05-13-00268-CR, (1) whether the notes of the June 20, 2012 hearing are 

available and can be transcribed; (2) if the notes are available, the date by which the 

record will be filed; and (3) if the notes are not available or cannot be transcribed, 

whether appellant is at fault for the loss or destruction of the notes and whether the 

parties can agree on a substituted record.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, including its written 

findings of fact, any orders, and any supporting documentation to this Court within THIRTY 

DAYS of the date of this order.

We ABATE the appeals to allow the trial court to comply with the order. The appeals 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.52 MB)

Tags:Loglines, Afghan Disposition, DEMIL

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.16 
DESCRIPTION OF LONG-TERM DISABILITY ARRANGEMENT 
The Company makes available an executive disability coverage program to provide disability benefits to its named executive officers and other management employees. The executive disability coverage is designed to replace 66 2/3 % of the base salary, bonuses and incentive compensation of the employee up to a maximum of $25,000 per month benefit. Under the executive disability coverage, the employee pays for the premiums. 
In addition to the above coverage, the Company provides supplemental disability coverage for its President and Chief Executive Officer, Karl G. Glassman.  This supplemental disability coverage provides the following benefits: 
 
	
									
	Name
	 
	Annual Premium*
	 
	Monthly Benefit
	 
	Benefit Period

	Karl G. Glassman
	 
	$
	1,185
	 
	$
	4,200
	 
	Until Age 65

	* Under the supplemental disability coverage, the Company pays for the premium.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No s . 1D 20 22

- 2271 1D 20 22

- 2272

_____________________________
S TATE O F F LORIDA ,
Appellant,

v.

D ANIEL L EANDER M C C ALL ,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Dixie County

. Jennifer Jones Johnson , Judge

.
November 29, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
Appellant, the State of Florida, challenges the trial court’s imposition of a downward departure sentence in these consolidated appeals. As the State argues, and as the trial court acknowledged below, any duress Appellee, Daniel Leander McCall, was facing at the time he committed the offenses at is sue is not the duress intended by the Legislature in its list of mitigating circumstances justifying a downward departure sentence in section 921.0026(2), Florida Statutes. See State v. Issel , 919 So. 2d 719, 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (explaining that duress usually involves some sort of coercion o r threat). There was no evidence presented in the underlying cases that Appellee acted under coercion or threat.2 As for the trial court’s finding that Appellee was emotionally distressed when he committed the off enses , a trial court may impose a downward departure sentence for reasons not delineated in section 921.0026(2) if the reason given is supported by competent, substantial evidence and is not otherwise prohibited. See State v. Thompkins , 113 So. 3d 95, 98 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013). The State contends that although emotional distress may be a n appropriate mitigating factor in some cases, the trial court’s finding of emotional distress in this case was not supported by competent, substantial evidence. We agree. The records before us in these appeals are devoid of any of the evidence relied upon by the trial court in finding that Appellee was emotionally distressed

. Accordingly, we reverse the tria l court’s imposition of a downward departure sentence and remand for resentencing . See State v. Montanez , 133 So. 3d 1151, 1154 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (holding that the trial court’s reason for the downward departure
sentences

– that the appellee was “experi encing great difficulty in his personal life due to his divorce which made him more susceptible to substance abuse”

– was not supported by competent, substantial evidence).

R EVERSED and R EMANDED for resentencing.

L EWIS , W INOKUR , and M .K. T H OMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee

, for Appellant.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee

, for Appell ee

.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.08 MB)

Tags:police week, DLA Installation SUpport at Richmond, People and Culture

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 3 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 3

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an 
              adjournment of the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 3, 2013

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an 
              adjournment of the House of Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Friday, 
January 4, 2013, through Monday, January 21, 2013, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on Monday, 
January 21, 2013, or such other time on that day as may be specified by 
its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, 
or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House 
adjourns on any legislative day from Friday, January 4, 2013, through 
Saturday, January 5, 2013, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Monday, January 14, 2013, or until the 
time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, or their respective designees, acting jointly after consultation 
with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority Leader of the 
House, shall notify the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, 
to reassemble at such place and time as they may designate if, in their 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Intelligence AgencyCOMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN DEFENSE OF THE NATION

Search
Search

Search
                    - Facilities Operating Status
                    - Employee Resources

-  Home		 
-  About    -  FAQs             
  -  Organization      -  Locations             
    -  Missile and Space Intelligence Center             
    -  Joint Military Attache School             
    -  Joint Military Intelligence Training Center 
  -  Office of the Inspector General             
  -  Equal Opportunity & Diversity             
  -  Military Integration Office             
  -  History      -  DIA Museum             
    -  George Washington Letters             
    -  Directors of DIA             
    -  The Historians 
  -  Patriots Memorial             
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response             
  -  Contact Us 
-  News & Features    -  Articles             
  -  Videos             
  -  DIA in the News             
  -  Threat Reports             
  -  Photo Gallery             
  -  No FEAR             
  -  Podcasts             
  -  DIA Comics 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Career Fields      -  Analysis             
    -  Counterintelligence             
    -  Finance & Acquisition             
    -  Human Intelligence             
    -  Human Services             
    -  Information Technology             
    -  Inspector General             
    -  Legal             
    -  Mission Management             
    -  Office Management & Infrastructure             
    -  Science & Technology             
    -  Security 
  -  Search Vacancies             
  -  Apply to DIA             
  -  Hiring Process             
  -  Internships             
  -  Veteran Programs 
-  Business    -  Contractor Personnel Security             
  -  SIA3             
  -  SITE III             
  -  Innovation             
  -  NeedipeDIA             
  -  Office of Small Business Programs             
  -  Small Business FAQs 

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Chaos to Clarity: DoDIIS Worldwide Conference opens in Portland

By Sharolyn Gailliard, Office of Corporate Communications

                Portland, OR  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this
Quarterly Report of Mojo Data Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2018, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Spiteri, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: September 6, 2018 | By: | /s/ Joseph Spiteri                                
|----------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Joseph Spiteri                                    
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer, Mojo Data Solutions, Inc.

| |  | 
| |  |
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the annual report of Reg Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A, Amendment No. 1 for the year ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: March 17, 2011 /s/  James Vandeberg James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-1600

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Antonio Deshawn Russell

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern

 ____________

 Submitted: August 11, 2022

Filed: August 16, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Russell appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he

pleaded guilty to drug and firearm offenses. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and

1The Honorable John A. Jarvey, then Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Southern District of Iowa, now retired.
has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the

substantive reasonableness of the sentence.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the sentence is not substantively

unreasonable, as the court did not commit a clear error of judgment in weighing the

appropriate sentencing factors, see United States v. Peithman, 917 F.3d 635, 653 (8th

Cir. 2019); United States v. Garcia, 946 F.3d 413, 419 (8th Cir. 2019); and the

sentence is below the Guidelines range, see United States v. Moore, 581 F.3d 681,

684 (8th Cir. 2009) (per curiam). We have also independently reviewed the record

under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues

for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.20
 
Description of Compensation of Directors


Each Director not employed by First Data or affiliates of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR) receives the following:


		
	•
	At the time of their appointment, a one-time grant of 158,182 options to purchase shares of Class A common stock of First Data pursuant to the First Data Corporation 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (2015 Plan) with a strike price equal to the Fair Market Value at the time of grant to vest in equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the grant date.




		
	•
	Annual grant of restricted stock of First Data equivalent in value to $125,000, both at the time of their appointment and during the first quarter of each subsequent calendar year during which they continue to serve pursuant to the 2015 Plan and on the following terms:




		
	◦
	20% vesting one year from the grant date;


		
	◦
	40% vesting two years from the grant date;


		
	◦
	40% vesting three years from the grant date;


		
	◦
	Forfeiture of unvested awards upon termination of Board service for any reason other than Death or Disability; and


		
	◦
	In the event of Death or Disability, First Data shall exercise call rights and pay 100% of the fair market value for unvested awards.




		
	•
	Annual cash retainer of $75,000 to be paid in quarterly installments on the first day of each calendar quarter.




Each non-employee Director associated with KKR receives an annual cash retainer of $40,000, payable in semi-annual installments.


All cash compensation may be deferred under the First Data 2008 Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan based upon the election made prior to each calendar year by each director. All amounts deferred will accrue earnings based on the performance of Class A common stock and are paid to the director upon termination of the director’s service, subject to acceleration of the payout under certain circumstances.