alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.94 MB)

Tags:#ACC, #Innovation, #MXG, #RNEP, #shawafb

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-1306V

UNPUBLISHED

ROCHELLE LAMBRICK,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: November 8, 2019

Special Processing Unit (SPU); Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Wa shington, DC, for
petitioner.

Julia Marter Collison, U.S. Department of Justice, Washingt on, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On August 28, 2018, Rochelle Lambrick filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compens ation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she su ffered a left shoulder injury as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to he r on September 27, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processi ng Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On November 7, 2019, Respondent fil ed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to comp ensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that Petitioner’s “alleged injury is

1 I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redac t medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of pr ivacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified

material fits within this definiti on, I will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United

States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (‘SIRVA’) and thus, finds this case to be compensable.” Id . Respondent further agrees that “[t]here were no other causes identified for petitioner’s SI RVA. Records indicate that petitioner has suffered the sequela of her injury for mo re than six months. Based on the medical records outlined above, petitioner has met the statutory requi rements for entitlement to compensation.” Id.

In view of Respondent’s position a nd the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
# DIA Comic Book Series Returns to Battle Killer Robots

/ Published March 22, 2024
Washington D.C., 
The latest issue of Defense Intelligence Agency’s comic book series illustrates how DIA’s experts work to stay ahead of rapidly changing global technology, maintaining the nation’s defense intelligence advantage.

The comic books provide DIA with a fun, accessible method to help tell the agency’s story to audiences young and old, said Myles Scrinopskie, graphic design and web operations team chief for DIA’s Office of Corporate Communications.

“This is just a terrific initiative for reaching young Americans in particular,” Scrinopskie said. “What an appealing way to let the public know about the importance of good intelligence for national defense and the many impressive capabilities DIA brings to the fight.”

DIA produces the comic books to share at public events and conferences, where people who may be unfamiliar with the agency can learn about DIA functions.  DIA launched the series in 2019.

The latest issue centers on a vignette wherein DIA intelligence ensures an effective defense against the “killer robots” of “Badlandia.” The first issue focused on the value of foundational military intelligence. Both issues are available here: DIA Comics.

Future issues will focus on further capabilities DIA employs to achieve its mission — to provide intelligence on foreign militaries to prevent and win wars.

###
Exhibit
31.2



CERTIFICATION
BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Certification
of Chief Financial Officer

of
Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)



I,
Michael L. Carroll, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1)
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triton Pacific Investment Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”);



2)
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;



3)
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;



4)
The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the Company and have:



a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and



c)
disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;
and



5)
The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and



b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.





|Date: November 14, 2017      
|-----------------------------
|                             
|/s/ Michael
    L. Carroll   
|Michael L. Carroll           
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)





50
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Bernard Byrne, the Group Chief Financial Officer of Allied Irish Banks, p.l.c., certify that:



|1 | I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 20-F/A of Allied Irish Banks, p.l.c.;
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2 | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 27 September 2010



|           |  |                              
|---------- |  | -----------------------------
|Signature: |  | /s/ Bernard Byrne            
|           | 
|Name:      |  | Bernard Byrne                
|           | 
|Title:     |  | Group Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7436

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GERALD ANDERSON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CR-95-134, CA-98-854)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 11, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald Anderson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Anderson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Anderson, Nos.

CR-95-134; CA-98-854 (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 9250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3583]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 12, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Summit Bancshares, Inc., to become a bank holding company by 
acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Summit Bank, both in 
Tulsa, Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 10, 
2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-3583 Filed 2-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### The KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 11676.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Jan. 27, 1940.

Frank H. Moore, of Kansas City, Mo., and Robert A. Littleton, of Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Case remanded to United States Board of Tax Appeals with direction to enter an order that there is no present deficiency in taxes or interest for the years 1922 to 1925, inclusive, pursuant to stipulation.
#### In the Matter of William Delmont et al., Respondents, v Joseph F. Kelly et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondents appeal from an order of the Supreme Court of Erie County which, following a hearing, declared null and void the results of an organizational meeting of the Erie County Conservative Party on October 1, 1990, and directed a new organizational meeting be held in an expeditious fashion.

Respondents’ contention that the failure to join the Erie County Conservative Party as a necessary party requires dismissal of the petition is without merit *(see, Matter of Michaels v New York State Bd. of Elections,*154 AD2d 873). All necessary parties were joined, including those persons claiming to have been elected to Party leadership positions (CPLR 1001 [a]; *compare, Matter of Rizzo v Withers,*158 AD2d 497). Moreover, the Erie County Conservative Party has been deemed "functus officio” until an organizational meeting could be held to elect new officers *(Matter of Mazur v Kelly,*170 AD2d 1037).

*1068Respondents’ argument that the petition was insufficiently pleaded is similarly without merit. The petition alleged facts sufficient to establish a right to the particular relief sought *(see, Matter of Reich v Power,*30 AD2d 925, *affd sub nom. Matter of Reich v Lisa,*22 NY2d 887; *compare, Matter of Mencher,*245 App Div 381). Respondents received adequate notice of the allegations and objections against them. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J.— Election Law.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Law-ton and Davis, JJ. (Order entered Mar. 27, 1991.)
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pegasus  Aircraft  Partners
II, L.P.  (the  "Partnership")  for the period ended  December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
and  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Richard S. Wiley,  President and Chairman of the
Board  of  Pegasus  Aircraft  Management  Corporation,  General  Partner  of the
Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Partnership.



Date: March 28, 2003           By:  /s/ RICHARD S. WILEY
                                    --------------------
                                    Richard S. Wiley
                                    President and Chairman of the Board
                                    of Pegasus Aircraft Management Corporation.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 4, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132391 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132391 COA: 268677 Lapeer CC: 98-006374-FC DAVID G. BENNER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 15, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 4, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.07


2016 INVESTMENT ELECTION FORM
Valero Energy Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan


Direction of Investments


The undersigned Participant hereby directs that the measurement of the Participant’s account be determined as if it were invested in the fund options as indicated below.


DEFERRALS OF SALARY AND/OR BONUSES BEGINNING 1/1/2016
WILL BE TREATED AS IF INVESTED AS INDICATED BELOW.


Enter your investment elections: 5% minimum/increments of 5%.
The total of the percentages must equal 100%.
You may invest in any one or more (including all) of the fund options.


	
		
	

_ _ _ _ _%    DGAGX   Dreyfus Appreciation


_ _ _ _ _%    FSTGX   Fidelity Intermediate Government


_ _ _ _ _%    JAWWX   Janus Worldwide


_ _ _ _ _%    MTIXX   Milestone Funds Treasury Obligations Portfolio


_ _ _ _ _%    OAKMX   Oakmark I


_ _ _ _ _%    RPMGX   Price Mid-Cap Growth


_ _ _ _ _%    SRINX   Columbia Income Z


_ _ _ _ _%    VBINX   Vanguard Balanced Index


_ _ _ _ _%    VEXMX   Vanguard Index Extended Market


_ _ _ _ _%    VFINX   Vanguard Index 500


_ _ _ _ _%    VQNPX   Vanguard Growth and Income
________
  100  %
	 








I understand that the elections I have chosen on this form shall remain in effect until I make a directive to change.
	
			
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	Participant’s Signature
	 
	Date

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	Participant’s Name
	 
	Participant’s Employee ID Number
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 963 

Preventing an unrealistic future Medicaid augmentation plan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2013 

Mr. COBURN (for himself, Mr. BURR, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. ISAKSON, and Mr. 

BARRASSO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

Preventing an unrealistic future Medicaid augmentation plan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing an Unreal5 istic FMAP Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 963 IS

1 SEC. 2. PREVENTING AN UNREALISTIC FEDERAL MEDICAL 

2 ASSISTANCE PERCENTAGE BY REPEALING 

3 THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT ENHANCED 

4 FEDERAL MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PERCENT5 AGES FOR MEDICAID EXPANSIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1905 of the Social Secu7 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d) is amended by striking sub8 sections (y) and (z). 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 1905 of 

10 such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d) is amended— 

11 (1) in the first sentence of subsection (b)— 

12 (A) by striking ‘‘subsections (y), (z), and’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘subsection’’; and 

14 (B) by striking ‘‘and subsection (y) (with15 out regard to paragraph (1)(C) of such sub16 section)’’; 

17 (2) in subsection (aa), in each of paragraphs 

18 (1)(A), (2)(A), and (3), by striking ‘‘, subsections 

19 (y) and (z),’’ each place it appears; and 

20 (3) in subsection (cc), by striking ‘‘subsections 

21 (y), (z), and’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall take effect on the earlier of— 

24 (1) the date of enactment of this Act; or 

25 (2) December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports, included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
registration statements on Form S-8, Registration No. 33-75254; Form S-8,
Registration No. 33-75252; Form S-8, Registration No. 33-92656; Form S-8,
Registration No. 333-01978; Form S-8, Registration No. 333-34839; Form S-8,
Registration No. 333-34837; Form S-8, Registration No. 333-81521; Form S-8,
Registration No. 333-81523; Form S-8, Registration No. 333-89405; Form S-8,
Registration No. 333-64410 and Form S-8, Registration No. 333-64412, relating to
the Company's 1992 Employee Stock Option Plan, 1992 Director Stock Option Plan,
First Amendment to the Employee Plan, Second Amendment to the Employee Plan,
Third Amendment to the Employee Plan, Fourth Amendment to the Employee Plan,
Fifth Amendment to the Employee Plan, First Amendment to the Director Plan,
Second Amendment to the Director Plan, Third Amendment to the Director Plan and
the Black Box Corporation 1999 Employee Stock Plan, Form S-3, Registration No.
333-48421, Form S-4, Registration No. 333-52937, Form S-4, Registration No.
333-77343, Form S-4, Registration No. 333-43752 and Form S-4 Registration No.
333-64656.



/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP



Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
May 17, 2002