alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
              This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
              from IJNT.net, Inc. March 31, 1999 financial statements and is
              qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
              statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            903
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     176
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,466
<PP&E>                                            2,179
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (615)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             671
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          16
<OTHER-SE>                                        3,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4,768
<SALES>                                           1,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,617
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                147
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (8,262)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (8,262)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (8,262)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.58)



</TABLE>
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

Filed: December 15, 2020

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

MALLYSSA DAY, * No. 20-70V

*

Petitioner, * Special Master Sanders

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Vaccine Rule 10(d)(3); 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(b); 

* Order Concluding Proceedings

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Charles E. Trainor, Desmond & Rand, Westbrook, ME, for Petitioner.

Christine M. Becer, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

The petition in this matter was filed on January 23, 2020. ECF No. 1. Petitioner alleged 

that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on January 23, 2017, caused her to develop bilateral 

carpal tunnel syndrome. Id. at 1. 

On September 17, 2020, Respondent submitted his Rule 4(c) report. ECF No. 15. 

Respondent argued that the Court deny compensation and dismiss this case because Petitioner had 

not submitted sufficient evidence to support her claim. Id. at 5. 

On September 28, 2020, I issued a formal notice pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3000aa12(d)(3)(A)(ii), advising Petitioner that the statutory 240-day time period for the issuance of a 

decision had expired and notifying Petitioner that she may withdraw the petition under § 300aa21(b) or choose to remain in the Vaccine Program. See ECF No. 16. 

On October 22, 2020, Petitioner filed a notice of intent to withdraw petition in which she 

stated that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(b), she was withdrawing her petition. See ECF No. 

18. 

1 Although this Order has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the 

Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-

347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Order

will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Order’s 

inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party 

has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is 

a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes 

medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 

privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Order will be available to the public. Id.
2

Based on Petitioner’s notice, it appears that Petitioner is electing to exercise her right under 

§ 300aa-21(b) to withdraw her petition following the Court’s failure to issue a decision within 240 

days of the filing of said petition. Therefore, Petitioner’s request to withdraw her petition is 

granted.

Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that proceedings “on the merits” 

of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment “on the merits” should be entered by the 

Clerk’s Office. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Herbrina D. Sanders

 Herbrina D. Sanders

Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          82,756
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,010,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    593,325
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,774,399
<PP&E>                                       7,787,392
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,182,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,725,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,667,394
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       206,667
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,895,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,725,549
<SALES>                                      6,950,219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,950,818
<CGS>                                        7,822,154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,687,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             196,604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,933,698)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,933,698)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 36,666
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,897,032)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.15)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 The undersigned, Rory O’Dare, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Treasurer of MOBAD SERVICE CORPORATION (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:
 
 1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedOctober 31, 2011(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 21st day of November, 2011.
 
 
 /s/ Rory O’Dare
 Rory O’Dare
 Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MOBAD SERVICE CORPORATION and will be retained by MOBAD SERVICE CORPORATION and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Michael D. ARNDT, Petitioner, v. ELECTRONIC METAL PRODUCTS, INC., State Compensation Insurance Authority, The Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado and Director, Division of Labor, Respondents.

No. 88SC323.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Dec. 4, 1989.

*291Richard T. Goold, Susan D.S. Knisley, Denver, Colo., for petitioner.

Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., Michael J. Steiner, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Carolyn A. Boyd, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, Colo., for respondents Electronic Metal Products, Inc., and the Indus. Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colo. and Director, Div. of Labor.

Paul Tochtrop, Denver, Colo., for respondent State Compensation Ins. Authority.

Robert A. Weinberger, P.C., Michael E. Harr, Denver, Colo., for amicus curiae Colo. Defense Lawyers Ass’n.

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari to review the unpublished decision of the court of appeals in *Arndt v. Electronic Metal Products, Inc.,*No. 87CA1428 (Colo.App., May 26, 1988). The court of appeals held that Michael Arndt, a worker who sustained an industrial injury prior to July 1, 1987, and who was ordered by an administrative law judge to undergo a vocational rehabilitation evaluation after attaining maximum medical improvement, was not entitled to temporary disability benefits for the time period following maximum medical improvement but prior to an administrative decision on whether vocational rehabilitation was necessary to render Arndt fit for a remunerative occupation. In accordance with our decision in *Allee v. Contractors, Inc.,*783 P.2d 273, (Colo.1989), we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the case to that court with directions to return the case to the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel for further proceedings consistent with our decision in *Allee.*

MULLARKEY, J., does not participate.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

WILLIAM FRANCIS SMITHSON,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 34 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Preventia, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Amendment 2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Murray Friedman, DDS
                                 ----------------------
                                 Murray Friedman
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Principal Financial Officer

September 14, 2011
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.45 MB)

Tags:2015 HHM Pictures, Strategic engagement, EVENT, People and Culture

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer 

I, James E. Dwyer, Jr., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michael Foods Group, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s second fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 5, 2013 

    

 

    

    

----
EX-10.17.8



 Exhibit 10.17.8 

FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE TRUST AGREEMENT UNDER THE 

CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY 
 GRANTOR TRUST
AGREEMENT 
 WHEREAS, Phillips Petroleum Company (now ConocoPhillips Company, hereinafter “Company”) and Wachovia Bank, National
Association (now Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., hereinafter the “Trustee”) entered into an amended and restated trust agreement as of June 1, 1998, subsequently amended as of May 3, 1999, as of January 15, 2002, as of
October 5, 2006, and as of May 1, 2012 (the “Trust Agreement”), establishing a trust (the “Trust”) for the purpose of holding monies and other property in connection with certain nonqualified deferred compensation plans
maintained by the Company (the “Plans”); and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Trust Agreement, the Trust Agreement
may be amended by a written instrument executed by the Trustee and the Company; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust Agreement is amended, effective May 1, 2015, as
follow: 
  

	 	1.	The fourth sentence of Section 2(c) of the Trust Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety to provide as follows: 

  

	 	 	“In the event the Company makes such payments directly, the Company may request the Trustee within sixty (60) months of the making of the payment to reimburse the Company for such payment from the Trust, and
upon receipt of evidence satisfactory to the Trustee that such payment has been made, the Trustee shall pay such reimbursement to the Company.” 


The Trust Agreement is in all other respects ratified and confirmed without amendment. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment to the Trust Agreement has been executed on behalf of the parties hereto on the 20 day of May, 2015. 

 

									
	 CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY
	 		 	WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
					
	By:    	 	/s/ Jeff W. Sheets	 		 	By:    	 	/s/ Andy Franck
		 	Jeff W. Sheets	 		 		 	
					
	Its:    	 	Executive Vice President, Finance,	 		 	Its:    	 	Vice President
		 	And Chief Financial Officer	 		 		 	
			
	 ATTEST
	 		 	ATTEST
					
	By:    	 	/s/ Leisa C. Munoz	 		 	By:    	 	/s/ Tonya M. Inscore
		 	Leisa C. Munoz	 		 		 	
					
	Its:    	 	Assistant Secretary	 		 	Its:    	 	Senior Vice President
#### UNIVERSAL, Inc., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 7079.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Feb. 8, 1940.

Allen H. Gardner and George M. Morris, both of Washington, D. C., Morris, Kix Miller & Baar, of Washington, D. C, of counsel) for petitioner.

Samuel O. Clark, Ji\, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, J. Louis Monarch, and S. Dee Hanson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and J. P. Wenchel and Irving M. Tullar, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before EVANS, MAJOR, and KER-NER, Circuit Judges.

EVANS, .Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals approving the action of the Commissioner who found that petitioner was liable for a deficiency income tax for the year 1934.

Petitioner is and was an' Illinois corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of storage batteries and parts, and, during the years 1920 to 1923, inclusive, was subjected to a Federal excise tax, under section 900 of the Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921 (40 Stat. 1122; 42 Stat. 291), upon its sales of storage batteries. Petitioner collected the amount of such excise taxes from its customers who purchased its batteries. It did not include as income nor deduct as taxes paid, the said amounts, and insisted it was not subject to said tax and its payments were made under protest. It brought suit in the Court of Claims to recover the amount of taxes paid and obtained judgment thereon, pursuant to which a refund in the amount of $25,583.84, was made to it in the fiscal year ending June 30, 1934. The refund payment was made by virtue of a judgment of the Court of Claims, Universal Battery Co. v. United States, 3 F.Supp. 878, affirmed on appeal by the Supreme Court, 291 U. S. 672, 54 S.Ct. 457, 78 L.Ed. 1061. Petitioner did not include this amount in its taxable income for the year 1934, and the Commissioner assessed a deficiency based thereon. Thus this controversy arose.

The amount paid to petitioner was by it retained. Any claims for refunds, by customers to whom it sold batteries, were barred by the statute of limitations. Like wise any claims for tax assessment by the Government for the years 1920 to 1923 in-*617elusive, were barred by the statute of limitations.

Our question is: Is a taxpayer who has paid excise taxes on storage batteries in prior years and in 1934, recovered from the Government all such sums so paid, because illegally assessed, liable under the Revenue Act of 1932 (§ 22, 26 U.S.C.A. § 22) for income taxes thereon for the year (1934) when the refunds were received?

The law is pretty well settled that: (a) Refunds of taxes erroneously and illegally collected constitute taxable income. Nash v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 88 F.2d 477. (b) The amount of such refunds should be included in taxpayer’s income for the year in which received. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co., 282 U.S. 359, 51 S.Ct. 150, 75 L.Ed. 383; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 47 F.2d 990.

The order of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Emil D. Kakkis, certify that: 

| 1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated: December 9, 2016 |   | /s/ Emil D. Kakkis                    |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                    |   | Emil D. Kakkis, M.D., Ph.D.           |
|                    |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |