alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
 of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
 
 I, M. Grier Eliasek, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 
 1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TP Flexible Income Fund, Inc. (the “Company”);
 
 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4) The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the Company and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5) The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 /s/ M. Grier Eliasek
 M. Grier Eliasek
 Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 Date: May 15, 2020
EXHIBIT
32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Point Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June
30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



Date:
September 30, 2016



|By:    | /s/
    Adam Wasserman                                                | 
|------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Adam
Wasserman                                                        | 
|Title: | Chief
    Financial Officer(principal financial & accounting officer) | 



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 178 (Thursday, September 13, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 46413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19884]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

41 CFR Part 301-1

[Notice-MA-2018-08; Docket No. 2018-0002, Sequence No. 20]


Federal Travel Regulation: Contract City-Pair Business-Class Air 
Accommodations

AGENCY: Office of Government-wide Policy (OGP), General Services 
Administration (GSA).

ACTION: Notification of Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) Bulletin 18-08, 
Contract City-Pair Business-Class Air Accommodations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: GSA is notifying agencies that Federal civilian employees of 
an agency as defined in its regulations, if authorized to travel via 
business-class air accommodations, must use the business-class city-
pair fare (coded as ``--CB'') where awarded for the route(s) listed on 
the travel authorization. The information outlined in an FTR bulletin 
will provide clarity and promote consistency across the Government.

DATES: FTR Bulletin 18-08 is available September 13, 2018.

ADDRESSES: The bulletin is located at www.gsa.gov/ftr under the ``FTR & 
Related Files'' tab.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, please 
contact Mr. Cy Greenidge, Office of Government-wide Policy, Office of 
Asset and Transportation Management, at 202-219-2349, or by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c1b5b3a0b7a4adb1aeada8a2b881a6b2a0efa6aeb7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e99d9b889f8c85998685808a90a98e9a88c78e869f">[email protected]</span></a>. Please cite Notice of FTR Bulletin 18-08.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal civilian employees of an agency as 
defined in FTR Sec.  301-1.1, if authorized to travel via business-
class air accommodations, must use the business-class city-pair fare 
(coded as ``--CB'') where awarded for the route(s) listed on the travel 
authorization. The Federal traveler must use this fare or have an 
authorized exception to mandatory use of a contract city-pair fare per 
the FTR. The information outlined in FTR Bulletin 18-08 will provide 
clarity and promote consistency across the Government. This bulletin is 
located at www.gsa.gov/ftr under the ``FTR & Related Files'' tab.

    Dated: September 6, 2018.
Jessica Salmoiraghi,
Associate Administrator, Office of Government-wide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-19884 Filed 9-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6820-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3688 — UTC/Kidde)

(2005/C 44/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. Philip Leslie GALIMANIS, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.

No. 88SC624.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Feb. 19, 1991.

ORDER OF COURT

Upon consideration of the Record on Appeal, together with the written and oral arguments of counsel, and now being sufficiently advised in the premises,

IT IS THIS DAY ORDERED that said Petition and Cross-Petition for Writs of Certiorari shall be, and the same hereby are, DENIED as having been improvidently granted.
6/1/2011 

Number of units meeting the current level of the proposed standards: 

Units meeting “Lignite” Hg beyond-thefloor Respective Hg + PM + HCl floor “Bituminous/subbituminous” Hg floor PExisting source 3 39 151 New source* 3 0 4 

* Units meeting new-source floor on a lb/MWh or lb/GWh basis based on 2010 ICR data Current proposed standards: 

MACT floor “Lignite” Hg beyond-thefloor “Bituminous/subbituminous” Hg floor PM floor Existing source 4 lb/TBtu 1.20 lb/TBtu 0.03 lb/MMBtu 0New source 0.04 lb/GWh 

(4 lb/TBtu) 

0.0002 lb/GWh 

(0.0185 lb/TBtu) 

0.05 lb/MWh 

(0.02 lb/MMBtu) 

(0.0
##### 



Exhibit 21 Subsidiaries of Registrant The registrant owns, directly or indirectly, 100% of the capital stock or similar ownership
interests of the following subsidiaries: 353 Patent LLC (Delaware)
Caro Kann Corporation (California)
Cylink Communications B.V. (Netherlands)
Cylink France SARL (France)
Cylink International Corporation (Cayman Islands)
Digital Spread Spectrum Technologies, Inc. (Delaware)
IRE Secure Solutions, Inc. (Delaware)
iVea Corporation (California)
Mykotronx, Inc. (California)
Nihon SafeNet KK (Japan)
Pijnenburg Securealink USA, Inc. (Delaware)
Pijnenburg Securealink, Inc. (Delaware)
Rainbow Information Technologies (Taiwan) Co., Ltd. (Taiwan)
Rainbow Information Technology Co. Ltd. (China)
Rainbow Technologies C.I. L.P. (Caymans)
Rainbow Technologies GmbH (Germany)
Rainbow Technologies International GmbH (Swiss)
Rainbow Technologies Ltd. (UK)
Rainbow Technologies North America, Inc. (California)
Raqia Acquisition Corp. (Delaware)
RNBO Corporation (Nevada)
SafeNet (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australia)
SafeNet Asia Limited (Hong Kong)
SafeNet B.V. (Netherlands)
SafeNet Brasil Ltda. (Brazil)
SafeNet BVI Ltd (British Virgin Islands)
SafeNet Canada, Inc. (Canada)
SafeNet China Ltd. (China)
SafeNet Consultancy Limited (UK)
SafeNet France SARL (France)
SafeNet Information Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (India)
SafeNet Japan KK (Japan)
SafeNet Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)
SafeNet Systems Pvt. Ltd. (India)
SafeNet Technologies B.V. (Netherlands)
SafeNet UK Limited (UK)
Seguridad Informatica SafeNet, S. de RL de CV (Mexico)
SFNT Finland Oy (Finland)
Wyatt River Software, Inc. (California)
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 92 

To require that the Government give priority to payment of all obligations 

on the debt held by the public and payment of Social Security benefits 

in the event that the debt limit is reached. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2013 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require that the Government give priority to payment 

of all obligations on the debt held by the public and 

payment of Social Security benefits in the event that 

the debt limit is reached. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRIORITIZE OBLIGATIONS ON THE DEBT HELD 

4 BY THE PUBLIC AND PAYMENT OF SOCIAL SE5 CURITY BENEFITS. 

6 In the event that the debt of the United States Gov7 ernment, as defined in section 3101 of title 31, United 

8 States Code, reaches the statutory limit, the authority of 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 92 IS

1 the Department of the Treasury provided in section 3123 

2 of title 31, United States Code, to pay with legal tender 

3 the principal and interest on debt held by the public and 

4 the authority of the Commissioner of Social Security to 

5 pay monthly old-age, survivors’, and disability insurance 

6 benefits under title II of the Social Security Act shall take 

7 priority over all other obligations incurred by the Govern8 ment of the United States. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 96-4540

ROBERT ROBERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston.

Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge.

(CR-88-254)

Submitted: November 19, 1996

Decided: January 22, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Hunt L. Charach, Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney,

Michael L. Keller, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Robert Roberson appeals the district court's revocation of supervised release imposed for conspiracy to distribute cocaine. We affirm.

Roberson contends that (1) the twenty-four month sentence he

received was plainly unreasonable in light of the violations; (2) the

court did not sufficiently consider his personal character in determining his sentence; and (3) the court inappropriately set a severe sentence because he is "a drug dealer" when there was no evidence he

engaged in drug dealing or use while on supervised release.

Addressing the first two claims, our review reveals sufficient evidence to conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion

in sentencing Roberson to the statutory maximum sentence for the

stated reasons. United States v. Davis, 53 F.3d 638, 642-43 (4th Cir.

1995); see 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(3) (West 1996).

Roberson's third contention is also meritless because the district

judge's comment that Roberson is a drug dealer does not suggest the

revocation was due to current drug dealing. Rather, the judge's comments merely reflect that as a convicted drug dealer, Roberson's continued criminal activity merited a strong response from the court.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order sentencing Roberson

to a maximum penalty for his violations of supervised release. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
#### COOKE v. SWOPE, Warden.

No. 9309.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 21, 1940.

Virgil Bernadine Cooke, in pro. per.

J. Charles Dennis, U. S. Atty., of Seattle, Wash., and Oliver Malm, Asst. U. S. .Atty., of Tacoma, Wash., for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

Appeal from an order of the District Court discharging an order to show cause and' denying the writ of habeas corpus.

Petitioner pleaded guilty to charges in two indictments, waived time and was sentenced to imprisonment. Thereafter he petitioned for' the writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he was being illegally detained of his liberty because he was without the assistance of legal counsel at the time he pleaded guilty and waived time for sentence.

There is nothing in the law of the land as interpreted by the much misread Johnson v. Zerbst opinion, 1938, 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461, or otherwise that requires a person, free from a disability, to have counsel in a United States court. He is, however, entitled to the aid and assistance of counsel and it is the duty of a trial court to see to it that both the letter and the spirit of this right are accorded him. A United States court through the application of the writ of habeas corpus will be diligent in ascertaining whether or not a prisoner has been deprived of this right, although the burden of showing it rests upon the petitioner.

Much has been written upon the applicable law, and instead of elaborating here we deem it sufficient to refer with approval to the opinion rendered by the trial court in this proceeding with its wealth of cited authority. Cooke v. Swope, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 492. Therein, also, the facts are accurately stated and each point raised by appellant correctly treated. Also in accord with the principles applied are McCoy v. Hudspeth, Warden, 10 Cir., 1939, 106 F.2d 810, 812; Wilson v. Hudspeth, Warden, 10 Cir., 1939, 106 F.2d 812, 814; Cundiff v. Nicholson, Warden, 4 Cir., 1939, 107 F.2d 162, 164; Thompson v. King, Warden, 8 Cir., 1939, 107 F.2d 307, 309.
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.18


EQUITY COMMONWEALTH


Schedule of Annual Independent Trustee Fees and Other Compensation


The independent trustees of Equity Commonwealth are entitled to the following annual compensation:


	
			
	Annual Retainer - Cash 
	 
	$60,000

	Annual Retainer - Restricted Share Awards
	 
	Each independent trustee will receive restricted common shares with a value of $100,000 on an annual basis, which shares will vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date.

	Lead Trustee Annual Retainer
	 
	$30,000

	Audit Committee Chair Annual Retainer
	 
	$20,000

	Compensation Committee Chair Annual Retainer
	 
	$15,000

	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair Annual Retainer
	 
	$15,000

	Audit Committee Member
	 
	$8,000

	Compensation Committee Member
	 
	$6, 000

	Governance Committee Member
	 
	$6,000

	Independent Special Litigation Committee Member
	 
	$6,000

	Reimbursements
	 
	Each independent trustee will be entitled to reimbursement for travel expenses related to a Board or Committee meeting.








Annual Compensation for Chairman of the Board of Trustees


The Chairman of the Board is entitled to the following annual compensation:
	
			
	Annual Retainer - LTIP Awards 
	 
	The Chairman of the Board will receive equity awards pursuant to the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP Awards”). 33% of the target LTIP Awards will consist of restricted common shares subject to time-based vesting restrictions. 67% of the target LTIP Awards will consist of restricted share units (“RSUs”) subject to time-based and performance-based vesting restrictions.  The LTIP Awards issued will have a target value of $2,000,000. The number of RSUs that will be earned by the Chairman of the Board, if any, will not be determined until the end of a three-year performance period, and therefore the actual value of the RSUs could be higher or lower than the foregoing target level, depending on the Company’s achievement of the applicable performance criteria.

	 
	 
	 

	Reimbursements 
	 
	The Chairman of the Board will be entitled to reimbursement for travel expenses related to company business and Board or Committee meetings.
```
**Exhibit 23**

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No.  333-52315  and  333-123436)  pertaining  to the 1992 Stock Option
Plan, 1993  Nonqualified  Stock Option Plan and 1997 Equity  Incentive Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-57411) pertaining to the Employee Stock
Purchase  Plan and the  Registration  Statements  (Form  S-8 No.  333-58778  and
333-115531)  pertaining to the 2000 Equity  Incentive  Plan of American  Italian
Pasta  Company  of  our  report  dated  June  12,  2008,  with  respect  to  the
consolidated  financial  statements  and  schedule  of  American  Italian  Pasta
Company,  and the effectiveness of internal control over financial  reporting of
American  Italian Pasta Company,  included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended September 30, 2005.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
June 12, 2008
```
EXHIBIT 12.1TOWER AUTOMOTIVE, INC.STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                       **Years Ended December 31,**   **2002**  **2003**  **2004**  **2005**  **2006** Earnings:                    Income (loss) before income taxes,extraordinary item and cumulative effectof accounting change $26,258  $(146,799) $(392,140) $(347,588) $(212,675)Net fixed charges (1)  89,178   117,015   171,415   125,323   112,744                 Total earnings $115,436  $(29,784) $(220,725) $(222,265) $(99,931)                Fixed charges:                    Interest expense $72,347  $94,829  $141,735  $103,279  $98,404 Capitalized interest  6,014   9,058   7,533   346   471 Interest factor of rental expense (2)  16,831   22,186   29,680   22,044   14,340 Amortization of debt expense  —   —   —   —   — Dividends on trust preferred securities  17,466   8,733   —   —   —                 Total fixed charges $112,658  $134,806  $178,948  $125,669  $113,215                 Earnings to fixed charges  1.02  (3)  (4)  (5)  (6) (1) Net fixed charges represent total fixed charges less capitalized interest and dividendson trust preferred securities. (2) The interest factor of rental expense has been calculated using the rate impliedpursuant to the terms of the rental agreements. For the periods presented, the interestfactor ranged from 30% to 55% of total rental expense. (3) For the year ended December 31, 2003, earnings were inadequate to cover fixed chargesby $164.6 million. (4) For the year ended December 31, 2004, earnings were inadequate to cover fixed chargesby $399.7 million. (5) For the year ended December 31, 2005, earnings were inadequate to cover fixed chargesby $347.9 million. (6) For the year ended December 31, 2006, earnings were inadequate to cover fixed chargesby $213.1 million.
Exhibit 32.2



WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of Cytyc Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy M. Adams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify that, to my knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                             
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 18, 2007 |  | /s/ Timothy M. Adams                                        
|                   |  | Timothy M. Adams                                            
|                   |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as our exhibit to the Form 10-K/A and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of
the Form 10-K/A.