alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMERICAN ITALIAN PASTA COMPANY
                        Board of Directors Remuneration Policy
                                    December, 1997



        This policy is to become effective January 1, 1998.


        Background/Scope
        ----------------

        The Board of  Directors of AIPC consists  of (1) AIPC  management, (2)
        employees of significant  stakeholders (e.g.:  Morgan  Stanley Capital
        Partners,  Citibank  Venture  Capital and  George  K.  Baum), and  (3)
        "outside"  directors.    This  policy  applies  to  only  the  outside
        directors as the  other directors are directly compensated  by AIPC or
        their employer  for their time  and effort dedicated to  AIPC's Board,
        including committee assignments.


        Remuneration Policy
        -------------------

             1.   Retainer - $15,000 per year, payable in AIPC  common stock,*
                  to be paid at the time of AIPC's annual meeting

             2.   Meeting Per Diem - $1,500 per meeting attended

             3.   Committee Participation -  $500 per meeting attended  plus a
                  $2,500 annual payment for Committee Chairman



        /s/ Horst W. Schroeder             /s/ T. S. Webster
        ------------------------------     ------------------------------
        Horst W. Schroeder                 Timothy S. Webster
        12/97                              12/97



        *Valuation to be determined the day of board meeting.
S. Con. Res. 16 Agreed to May 21, 2013

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That 

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR THE UNVEILING OF 

FREDERICK DOUGLASS STATUE. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor 

Center is authorized to be used for an event on June 19, 2013, 

to unveil a statue of Frederick Douglass. 

(b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the conduct of 

the event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect 

of the Capitol. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Order entered April 3, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 19
- 00031
- CV YOUNG YOO, IRVING SU PERMART, L.L.C. AND ACACIA LAS LOMAS, L.L.C., Appellant s V. A
- 1 MARKET ING, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 16
- 05632

ORDER Before the Court is appellee’s April 1, 2020 unopposed second motion to
extend time to file its brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than May 11, 2020.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
 of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
 
 I, M. Grier Eliasek, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 
 1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TP Flexible Income Fund, Inc. (the “Company”);
 
 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4) The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the Company and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5) The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 /s/ M. Grier Eliasek
 M. Grier Eliasek
 Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 Date: February 12, 2020
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 989 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 989

  To eliminate the prerequisite of direct appropriations relating to 
collection of health data and to modify standards for measuring sexual 
                    orientation and gender identity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 2013

  Mr. Schatz introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To eliminate the prerequisite of direct appropriations relating to 
collection of health data and to modify standards for measuring sexual 
                    orientation and gender identity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening Health Disparities 
Data Collection Act''.

SEC. 2. STANDARDS FOR MEASURING SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY 
              IN COLLECTION OF HEALTH DATA.

    Section 3101(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
300kk(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ``sexual orientation, 
        gender identity,'' before ``and disability status'';
            (2) in paragraph (1)(C), by inserting ``sexual orientation, 
        gender identity,'' before ``and disability status''; and
            (3) in paragraph (2)(B), by inserting ``sexual orientation, 
        gender identity,'' before ``and disability status''.

SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF PREREQUISITE OF DIRECT APPROPRIATIONS FOR DATA 
              COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS.

    Section 3101 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300kk) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (h); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection (h).
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.68 MB)

Tags:Defense Supply Center Columbus, Federal Executive Association, Honorable Robert Rigsby

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.11 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (7.47 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### Ronald Citrin, Appellant, v Royal Insurance Company, Inc., Respondent.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Saladino, J.), dated December 14, 1989, which denied his motion for leave to serve an amended complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find unpersuasive the plaintiff’s contention that the Supreme Court erred in denying his motion to amend certain allegations of the complaint and to insert a request for an award of damages in excess of $1,000,000. As we have previously observed: "It is firmly established that, while leave to amend a pleading shall be freely granted *(see,*CPLR 3025 [b]), a motion to amend is committed to the broad discretion of the trial court *(see, Edenwald Contr. Co. v City of New York,*60 NY2d 957; *Kramer & Sons v Facilities Dev. Corp.,*135 AD2d 942; *Fulford v Baker Perkins,*100 AD2d 861), and the resulting determination 'will not lightly be set aside’ *(Beuschel v Malm,*114 AD2d 569)” *(Ross v Ross,*143 AD2d 429). The record in the instant case demonstrates that the proposed factual allegations and requested damages set forth in the plaintiff’s motion would radically alter the terms of the alleged oral agreement upon which the plaintiff has commenced suit and upon which the defendant has relied in preparing its defense and conducting discovery. The plaintiff has offered no reasonable excuse for his lengthy delay in seeking to amend the complaint *(see, Ross v Ross, supra; Gallo v Aiello,*139 AD2d 490). Moreover, the proposed factual allegations find no evidentiary support in the record, but instead are refuted by the plaintiff’s own deposition testimony and therefore are patently without merit. Given these circumstances, we discern no improvident exercise of discretion in the Supreme Court’s denial of his motion *(see, Ross v Ross, supra; Century Resources Corp. v Weir,*134 AD2d 398; *Dolan v Garden City Union Free School Dist.,*113 AD2d 781).

We have considered the defendant’s alternative contention and find it to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with this Quarterly Report of PDK Energy Corp, on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending October  31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric Joffe , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) Such Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the quarter ending October  31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending October 31, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PDK Energy Corp.







December 7, 2011
By:
/s/ Eric JoffeEric Joffe,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
#### PEPSICO, INC., Petitioner, v. Freddie ALEXANDER, Respondent.

No. 73288.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Sept. 18, 1990.

ORDER

Petitioner requests rehearing of this court’s Summary Disposition of April 5, 1990, on the above styled case in that Respondent’s claim was facially defective having been filed outside the time allowed and is therefore barred by the statute of limitations. In its Summary Disposition this court stated that *PepsiCo v. Sharp,*781 P.2d 814 (Okl.1989), was dispositive of the issue presented in the present case. However, in *Sharp,*“[t]he statute of limitations *610was satisfied by Sharp’s timely claim against Lee Way,” and therefore, likewise against PepsiCo. *Sharp,*781 P.2d at 819. In the present case, Alexander’s single-event injury was not timely filed and thereby fails to meet the test articulated in *Sharp.*Petitioner’s request for rehearing is therefore granted.

The facts are not disputed. The Claimant slipped and fell while working for Lee Way Motor Freight, on July 5, 1984. He filed his claim on October 28, 1986. Petitioner asserted that the claim was barred by the one year statute of limitation which was then in effect. The Claimant neither pleaded nor offered any evidence to show anything which would operate to toll the running of the statute. As we held in *Armco v. Holcomb,*694 P.2d 937, 939 (Okl.1985), this was his burden. We are unpersuaded by Claimant’s argument that Petitioner could not assert the limitations defense, although he admits Lee Way could have.

Both the order of summary disposition challenged here by Petitioner and the order by the Workers’ Compensation Court are therefore vacated and the cause is remanded with directions to deny the claim.

The court’s action today should not be construed as having any effect on the remaining cases listed in the Summary Disposition.

HARGRAVE, C.J., OPALA, V.C.J., and HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS and DOOLIN, JJ., concur.

ALMA WILSON and SUMMERS, JJ., dissent.

KAUGER, J., recused.
April 9, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ALEXANDER MCNABB , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 01005

- CV V.

DKM CUSTOM PROPERTIE S, LLC, DES AMIS INVESTMENTS , LLC, KATIE ANDREWS, AND D ENISE BONIN , Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee s , DKM Custom Properties, LLC, Des Amis Investments, LLC, Katie Andrews, and Denise Bonin, signed, August 29, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Alexander McNabb to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2314
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CARL O'NEIL HAMRICK, a/k/a C. O'Neil Hamrick, Defendant - Appellant, and CLEVELAND FEDERAL BANK; W. H. HUDSON COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-2419-7-3AK) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl O'Neil Hamrick, Appellant Pro Se. James D. McCoy, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order granting a judgment of foreclosure against him. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hamrick , No. CA-95-2419-7-3AK (D.S.C. July 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED