alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.01










  


EXTENSION TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER







THIS EXTENSION TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (the "Extension Agreement") is made as of February __, 2016 by and among Mondial Ventures, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("Parent") and EZTicket Live Inc., a Nevada corporation ("Company").  The foregoing are sometimes singly referred to as a "Party" or collectively as the "Parties."


RECITALS:


WHEREAS, Company is engaged in the business of online ticketing for all types of events (the "Business"); and







WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of Parent, Merger Subsidiary and Company, Company Shareholders, as Company's majority shareholders, Parent, as Merger Subsidiary's majority shareholders, and Preferred Parent Shareholders have approved the merger of the Merger Subsidiary with and into Company (the "Merger") upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein and have signed an Agreement and Plan of Merger on June 11, 2015 (the "Agreement"); and


WHEREAS, Section 1.3 of the Agreement provided that the Termination Date of the Agreement would be July 15, 2015;


WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the Parties elected to extend the Termination Date of the Agreement to September 30, 2015;


WHEREAS, on September 30, 2015, the Parties elected to extend the Termination Date of the Agreement to November 30, 2015;


WHEREAS, on November 30, 2015, the Parties elected to extend the Termination Date of the Agreement to January 31, 2016;


WHEREAS, the Parties wish to extend the Termination Date to April 30, 2016 (unless such date is extended by the Parties in writing).


THEREFORE, The parties hereby agree to extend the Termination Date of the Agreement in Section 1.3 of the Agreement to April 30, 2016. All other provisions shall remain the same.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.


	
MONDIAL VENTURES, INC.


 


By:       /s/Dennis R Alexander

 Dennis R. Alexander, President


 


 


Date: February 19, 2016

	
EZTICKET LIVE INC.


 


By:  /s/Kevin L Jones                                                                                  


        Kevin L. Jones, President
### NUM BER 13-0 9-00 392- CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I - E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ CA RL TON RA

Y R ICH A RD SON , A pp ellan t,

v . TH E STA

TE OF T EXAS, A pp ellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On a p p ea l f ro m th e C rim in al D is tr ic t C o u rt of Je ffe rson C ou nty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ M EM ORA ND UM OPIN ION B efo re C h ie f Ju st ic e Va ld ez a n d J u st ic es Y añ ez an d V el a

M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel lan t, Car lt on R ay

Ric hardson, byand throug h his attor ney , has fil ed a moti on to dis mis s his appeal bec ause he no lon g er des ires to prosec ute i t. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42. 2(a). W i th ou t pa s s i ng on th e me r i ts of th e c as e, w e g r an t th e mo ti on to dismiss pursuantto Tex as Rul e of Appel lat e Procedu re 42.2 (a ) and di smi ss the appeal. Ha v ing

### 2

dis mis sed the a ppeal at a p p e llant 's req uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned, and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h. Any pendi ng moti ons ar e di smi ss ed as moot.

PERC UR IAM

Do not p ubl is h. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 4 7.2( b)

. Del iv er ed and filed the 1 1th d ay

of Ma rc h, 20 10.
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:15 AM

To: 'jon@elevatecinema.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Request for Additional Information: Elevate Cinema (FAA-2015-0387)

June 4, 2015 

Dear Mr. Barmby: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0387). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make, model, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description should include the maximum weight (including 

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by 

Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and 

remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the 

requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by June 18, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
Exhibit 23.1:

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Hudson Technologies, Inc.

Pearl River, New York

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-17133, No. 333-38598 and No. 333-129057) of Hudson Technologies, Inc. of our report dated March 3, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005.



/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP



|Valhalla New York
|-----------------
|March 27, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               10029
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       272849
<ALLOWANCES>                                         50000
<INVENTORY>                                        1165588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1625865
<PP&E>                                              265536
<DEPRECIATION>                                      515357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     2401563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1620512
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                              6384
<OTHER-SE>                                          774667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       2401563
<SALES>                                            1588177
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   1588177
<CGS>                                               995176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       995176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   2424459
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  136500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (1967958)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1967958)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.37)



</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 736 

To establish a maximum amount for special use permit fees applicable to 

certain cabins on National Forest System land in the State of Alaska. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 16, 2013 

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To establish a maximum amount for special use permit fees 

applicable to certain cabins on National Forest System 

land in the State of Alaska. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alaska Subsistence 

5 Structure Protection Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) COVERED CABIN.—The term ‘‘covered 

9 cabin’’ means a cabin (including related structures) 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 736 IS

1 on National Forest System land in the State of 

2 Alaska— 

3 (A) that is used for subsistence uses; 

4 (B) that is subject to section 1303(d) of 

5 the Alaska National Interest Lands Conserva6 tion Act (16 U.S.C. 3193(d)); 

7 (C) that is subject to section 1316(a) of 

8 the Alaska National Interest Lands Conserva9 tion Act (16 U.S.C. 3204(a)); or 

10 (D) that is used for commercial fishing by 

11 a permittee that does not generate more than 

12 $15,000 in gross annual income from the fish13 ery. 

14 (2) SUBSISTENCE USES.—The term ‘‘subsist15 ence uses’’ has the meaning given the term in sec16 tion 803 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Con17 servation Act (16 U.S.C. 3113). 

18 SEC. 3. ALASKA SUBSISTENCE USE CABIN PERMIT FEES. 

19 The maximum amount of the fee for the issuance of 

20 a special use permit by the Secretary of Agriculture for 

21 the use and occupancy of National Forest System land 

22 for a covered cabin shall be not more than $250. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title
18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Allied Irish Banks, p.l.c., a public limited liability company incorporated and registered in Ireland (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2011 (the Report) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                               
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|Dated: 24 April 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | DAVID DUFFY                   
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Name: David Duffy             
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by 
reference in this Form 10-K/A of our report dated February 18, 1997 included 
in Registration Statement File No. 333-21943 and into the Company's 
previously filed Registration Statements File Nos. 33-91578, 333-13589 and 
333-17355.  It should be noted that we have not audited any financial 
statements of the Company subsequent to December 31, 1996 or performed any 
audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.

                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota,
 April 10, 1997
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 1 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That provide the two Houses of Congress 

3 shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives 

4 on Thursday, the 4th day of January 2013, at 1 o’clock 

5 post meridian, pursuant to the requirements of the Con6 stitution and laws relating to the election of President and 

7 Vice President of the United States, and the President 

8 of the Senate shall be their Presiding Officer; that two 

9 tellers shall be previously appointed by the President of 

10 the Senate on the part of the Senate and two by the 

11 Speaker on the part of the House of Representatives, to 

12 whom shall be handed, as they are opened by the Presi13 dent of the Senate, all the certificates and papers pur14 porting to be certificates of the electoral votes, which cer15 tificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and acted 

16 upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning 

17 with the letter ‘‘A’’; and said tellers, having then read the 

18 same in the presence and hearing of the two Houses, shall 

19 make a list of the votes as they shall appear from said 
2 

†SCON 1 ES 

1 certificates; and the votes having been ascertained and 

2 counted in the manner and according to the rules by law 

3 provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the 

4 President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the 

5 state of the vote, which announcement shall be deemed 

6 a sufficient declaration of the persons, if any, elected 

7 President and Vice President of the United States, and, 

8 together with a list of the votes, be entered on the Jour9 nals of the two Houses. 

Passed the Senate January 3, 2013. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 1 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To provide for the counting on January 4, 2013, of 

dent of the United States. the electoral votes for President and Vice Presi-
----

**Exhibit      24.01**

| /s/                Ronald S. Lauder |   | /s/                Herb Granath      |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                |   |                                 |   |
| Ronald                S. Lauder     |   | Herbert                A. Granath    |   |
|                                |   |                                 |   |
| /s/                Michael Garin    |   | /s/                Wallace Macmillan |   |
|                                |   |                                 |   |
| Michael                Garin        |   | Wallace                Macmillan     |   |
|                                |   |                                 |   |
| /s/                Frank Ehmer      |   | /s/                Charles Frank     |   |
|                                |   |                                 |   |
| Frank                Ehmer          |   | Charles                Frank         |   |
|                                |   |                                 |   |
| /s/                Herbert Kloiber  |   | /s/                Alfred W. Langer  |   |
|                                |   |                                 |   |
| Herbert                Kloiber      |   | Alfred                W. Langer      |   |
|                                |   |                                 |   |
| /s/                Bruce Maggin     |   | /s/                Ann Mather        |   |
|                                |   |                                 |   |
| Bruce                Maggin         |   | Ann                Mather            |   |
|                                |   |                                 |   |
| /s/                Christian Stahl  |   | /s/                Eric Zinterhofer  |   |
|                                |   |                                 |   |
| Christian                Stahl      |   | Eric                Zinterhofer      |   |

----
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: A.H.C.S., IN C., Appellant

______________________

2018

- 1013

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No.

86782221.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J AMES A. K NOWLTON , Law Office of James A Know lton, Basalt, CO, argued for appellant.

T HOMAS L. C ASAGRANDE , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by
T HOMAS W. K RAUSE

, C HRISTINA J. H IEBER

, M ARY B ETH W ALKER

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, Chief Judge, M OORE and
W ALLACH

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

November 13, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.7 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Lowry, Nick (OST) 

From: Lowry, Nick (OST) 

Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 10:04 AM 

To: Don Hainbach (dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com) 

Cc: Podberesky, Samuel (OST); B. Edelman (bedelman@hbs.edu) 

Subject: FW: Service: Motion of British Airways for Extension of Time to File Its Answer to 

Complaint 

Attachments: Motion for additional time 032113.pdf 

This will service as notice that we have granted British Airways' request for an extension oftime in which to file an 

answer in Docket DOT-OST-2013-0025 until April 5, 2013. 

I will place a copy of this e-mail in the docket. 

Regards, 

:'\icholas Lmn\· 

Sc11ior .'\(ton 1cy 

( )(1icc or .\\-ialion Eni(HH'lllCll( &. Proceedings 

( Hficc ol' the ( ~cncT<tl Counsel 

l · .S. De pl. of Transportation 

From: Don H. Hainbach [mailto:dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com] 

Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 5:10 PM 

To: Podberesky, Samuel (OST) 

Cc: Dols, Jonathan (OST); Lowry, Nick (OST) 

,., __ ) 

Subject: FW: Service: Motion of British Airways for Extension of Time to File Its Answer to Complaint 

Sam 

This will confirm that Mr. Edelman has advised BA that he will not oppose the attached motion. 

Best regards 

Don H. Hainbach 

Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach PC 

1200 New Hampshire Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20036-6802 

dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com 

Phone: (202) 776-3976 

Fax: (202) 776-3975 

.!·: ... 

_) 

i""• 

THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHED ITEMS ARE CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE 

INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS 

COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY 

US BY TELEPHONE OR BY REPLY E-MAIL, AND DELETE/DESTROY THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE. THANK YOU. 

1
#### Robert Young, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for false arrest, malicious prosecution and battery, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated June 20, 1989, as denied his motion for leave to amend the bill of particulars.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, we discern no improvident exercise of discretion in the Supreme Court’s denial of the plaintiff’s motion to amend the bill of particulars to include a claim of damages for permanent psychological injury *(see,*CPLR 3025 [b]). The motion was made just prior to the retrial on the issue of damages and nearly four years after the original bill of particulars was served. Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention and as noted in our prior order *(see, Young v New York City Tr. Auth.,*143 AD2d 656), neither the original pleadings nor the testimony at the first trial presented the defendant with notice of the claim the plaintiff now seeks to add. Indeed, in the original bill of particulars, the plaintiff affirmatively stated that he suffered no permanent injuries. Furthermore, the plaintiff failed to advance any reasonable excuse for his delay in asserting the claim.

We have examined the plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the order is affirmed. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.