alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joshua
Easterly and Michael Fishman, as Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company, and Alan Kirshenbaum, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                           
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------
|/s/ Joshua Easterly 
|Name:                |  | Joshua Easterly           
|Title:               |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                |  | November 3, 2014          
|                    
|/s/ Michael Fishman 
|Name:                |  | Michael Fishman           
|Title:               |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                |  | November 3, 2014          
|                    
|/s/ Alan Kirshenbaum
|Name:                |  | Alan Kirshenbaum          
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer   
|Date:                |  | November 3, 2014          

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tony Johnson, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Hornblass, J. at *Huntley*hearing, trial and sentence) rendered February 9, 1989, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of robbery in the third degree and sentencing him as a second felony offender to an indeterminate term of *3Vi*to 7 years imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s conviction arises out of the July 8, 1988 street robbery of approximately $1300 from an off-duty police detective, who apprehended defendant a half block away.

The hearing court did not improperly curtail the cross-examination of the complaining witness. No abuse of discretion is perceived by the hearing court’s termination of the cross-examination when the questioning proceeded far beyond the scope of the hearing and became repetitive *(see, People v Sorge,*301 NY 198).

At trial, defendant’s application for a missing witness charge was properly denied, as there was no showing that the uncalled witness, whose identity was not known to the complaining witness or to the People, would have contradicted or added to the testimony of the other witnesses *(People v Almodovar,*62 NY2d 126). Nor was there any showing that the uncalled witness was available to, or under the control of, the People *(People v Gonzalez,*68 NY2d 424).

Finally, defendant’s claim that the sentence imposed constituted a penalty for the exercise of his right to a trial, is *330unsupported by the record. Pre-trial plea negotiations took into account defendant’s substantial misdemeanor record and resulted in an offer by the People, and consented to by the court, of a sentence of *2V¿*to 5 years imprisonment. The court noted that if defendant were to be convicted after trial, he faced a maximum sentence of *3Vi*to 7 years imprisonment, which the court believed would be appropriate in light of defendant’s status as a repeat larceny offender. At sentencing, the court again gave due consideration to all available facts, including the evidence in the instant case, the probation report, defendant’s past conviction record, and the comments of the prosecutor, defense counsel, and defendant *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302). The sentence imposed does not represent an abuse of discretion in these circumstances *(People v Davis,*92 AD2d 177, *affd*61 NY2d 202). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Kassal, JJ.
Exhibit




HUBBELL INCORPORATED 
2005 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN 
(As Amended and Restated Effective May 5, 2015)


Amendment


Section 2.39 of the plan is amended and restated as follows:
2.39    “Stock” means the Common Stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share, and such other securities of the Company that may be substituted for Stock pursuant to Article 10.
Exhibit 32.2



MPS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of MPS Group, Inc. (the Form 10-K), I, Robert P. Crouch, Senior
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|/S/ ROBERT P. CROUCH                                                                        
|Robert P. Crouch Senior Vice President,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer March 16,
2005
Exhibit 23.2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.33-75254, 33-75252, 33-92656, 333-01978, 333-34839, 333-34837, 333-81521, 333-81523, 333-64410,333-64412, 333-100294, 333-100295, 333-116550 and 333-116551) and the Registration Statements onForm S-4 (Nos. 333-77343, 333-43752 and 333-64656) of our report dated May 25, 2005 relating to theconsolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting of Black Box Corporation as of and for thefiscal year ended March 31, 2005 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended March 31, 2005.
/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Chicago, Illinois
Carlos 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 7, 2013

No. 04-11-00550-CV

BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

Carlos M. ZAFFIRINI, Sr., Dolores Angelina De la Garza, Clarissa De La Garza, Cristina 

Lorena Benavides, Servando Roberto Benavides, Delia Hilda Benavides Martinez, Maria 

Eugenia Benavides Gutierrez, Las Tinajas Minerals, Ltd, Diana Solis,

Appellee/s

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CVF000798D1

The Honorable Joe Lopez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered Appellees’ motion for rehearing; the motion is DENIED. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 49.3.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of November, 2013.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### A. J. CROWHURST & SONS, Inc., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 7058.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Jan. 16, 1940.

Jesse Bay Robinson, of New York City, for petitioner.

James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and Helen R. Carloss, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before BIGGS, MARIS, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

As counsel for the parties agreed at the argument, the sole question involved in this case is whether the value of its capital stock declared by a corporation in its first return filed under Section 215 of the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, 48 Stat. 207, may be changed by an amended return filed by the corporation within the time fixed for filing the original returns as extended by the Commissioner. This question has just been answered in the affirmative by the Supreme Court in Haggar Co. v. Commissioner, 60 S.Ct. 337, 84 L.Ed.-, reversing the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upon which the respondent relied. Scaife & Sons v. Driscoll, 3 Cir., 94 F.2d 664, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 603, 59 S.Ct. 63, 83 L. Ed. 383, also cited by the respondent is to be distinguished, inter alia, by the fact that the amended return in that case was not filed within the time limited by law for filing the original return.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed.
Exhibit 13
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 12, 2010
    /s/ OLLI-PEKKA KALLASVUOName:
    Olli-Pekka KallasvuoTitle:
    President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 12, 2010
    /s/ TIMO IHAMUOTILAName:
    Timo IhamuotilaTitle:
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8889-8890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.

[[Page 8890]]

    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict.
    Date: March 1, 2012.
    Time: 2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites, Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road 
NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Ramesh Vemuri, Ph.D., Chief, Scientific Review 
Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C-212, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 402-
7700, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a282c6869281a343332743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="611317535213210f08094f060e17">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; NIA Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research (RCMAR).
    Date: March 23, 2012.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: DoubleTree Hotel Bethesda (Formerly Holiday Inn Select), 
8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Alfonso R. Latoni, Ph.D., Deputy Chief and 
Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National 
Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C218, Bethesda, MD 
20892. (301) 402-7702, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#acedc0cac3c2dfc382e0cdd8c3c2c5ecc2c5c482cbc3da"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0849646e67667b672644697c67666148666160266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 7, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-3453 Filed 2-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

ZUSAMMENSETZUNG DES PRÜFUNGSAUSSCHUSSES

ALLGEMEINES AUSWAHLVERFAHREN EPSO/B/11/03

(2005/C 88 A/03)

VERWALTUNGSINSPEKTORINNEN/VERWALTUNGSINSPEKTOREN (B 5/B 4)

(deutscher Sprache)

in den Bereichen „Koordinierung der Produktion“ und „Korrekturlesen“

----
J **OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** E!onoawbls Gm. ii.

Sheppard,Pago 2

euhh leaseholdmitaecr warnthe own of B.966.62.Qr that aaount **+A4 aua**  **of** X00.00 wao tander*Qinto **oourt and**  it wms decreed tkt the plaintiffl hould hwe aerely a pm+ eonrl :uQ,gaent

a@faRt the Par% Gil & Gas Goqamy, Ino., for the bslanoe arf 396.62, with interemt at six peroant aRa Baste of cult. It u8m furthor ordered that abi;l amnwtd lisn far taxes ap&mt the tbuwtotora nlrting loas~hold o&ate &mulQ be aab was expromslyremTed, anQ thh Oi0ua oamt thereuponwea in tha jua~mi rosamodand v804ma.
You reqormt ua to odrias JW atethor or not the aax asreamor-ooll*ator of Hueoa Ceunty Bheula noomlso **the** jua83i49nt

ma **aooept** the papoat of 

### llOO.00 uld iO8u0 0 **reoslpt for**  ouch armant and ales iuue o6a%ffic#(ru 8ew oallin~ tho balaaoeoi tba, tun, ah8r& on her dtiin~uux8 tax roll, ae well am **ths** 

### ourrea% taxemfor 8h4year 19cO. **It** would aerv* no Oorporah-e for ur **to** 60 into the aeritm of the cams oonaltded**by** the **abgvo Judgrreat.**  For, it la the .!ua@wntof l wurt of **ooatpetwc** Jurlealatian, **in a**  **salt** ror **taxse In**  **wfllmh th4**  partiu wmr+ betore 6ho Chart, She ?&mte reprerea8adby %t*8 attorney pro*idod far by thm CrvnrtltutIon tit3a **6titUt#. Sls%O$**  **howover ttm**  **the** ror appaal ha6 not OX@‘& urd the QumotiQR iaYdYea In the multwes 8 debetableone, 10 think lt Rdtlrableior the ax hmoaaor-Gollsotcwof &wmw Gotratp to reiraln fr@s **iso~lne** rsoeiptsand **osrtifioatu in**  

### rwognltloa **of** the Jud$aenttmtll the mme ha8 **baesarr** fllul. Ii thm Dira r1th.i.a ahlet! 

### en l ppaal say bo gm?eetrllp4mroadthout suoh **being** done, in our 0 ialon, f the Jadeiiaeat mhoala that be honorad snQ your quelrt ~a rhodld tm anmrmd fn the a?flmatlre.
EX-10.83



 EXHIBIT 10.83 

AMENDMENT 5 TO TRANSITION SERVICES AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT 5 TO TRANSITION SERVICES AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), is made and effective as of May 28, 2013, is by
and between Dean Foods Company, a Delaware corporation, (“Dean Foods”) and The WhiteWave Foods Company, a Delaware corporation (“WhiteWave”). 

WHEREAS, Dean Foods and WhiteWave previously entered into a Transition Services Agreement dated October 25, 2012, which became effective
as of October 31, 2012 (as amended by Amendments 1 and 2, 3, 4, the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, Dean Foods and
WhiteWave desire to amend a Schedule to the Agreement to modify certain end dates and base costs as reflected in the Schedules to the Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

1. Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms contained in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to them in
the Agreement. 
 2. Amendments to Schedules. 

(a) Schedule B of the Agreement is hereby amended to include the end dates and base costs set forth on Exhibit I hereto. 

3. Binding Effect and Assignment. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their respective
successors and permitted assigns, except as is otherwise expressly provided herein or in the Agreement. 
 4. The Agreement. All
other terms and provisions of the Agreement not expressly modified by this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby expressly ratified and confirmed. 

5. Titles. The titles of the articles, sections and subsections of this Amendment are for convenience of reference only and shall not
be considered a part of or affect the construction or interpretation of any provisions of this Amendment. The words “herein,” “hereof,” “hereto” and “hereunder” and other words of similar import refer to this
Amendment as a whole and not to any particular Article, Section or other subdivision. 
 6. Execution. This Amendment may be executed
in any number of original, facsimile, or portable document format (pdf) counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their proper and duly
authorized representatives as of the date first set forth above. 
  

			
	DEAN FOODS COMPANY
		
	By: 	 	/S/    SHAY BRAUN        
	
	Name: Shay Braun
	Title: Senior Vice President


  

			
	THE WHITEWAVE FOODS COMPANY
		
	By: 	 	/S/    ROGER THEODOREDIS        
	
	Name: Roger Theodoredis
	Title: Executive Vice President and General Counsel









 EXHIBIT I 

Schedule B—WhiteWave As Provider 
  

									
	 Service
	  	New End
Date	 	  	New Base Cost
($/Month)	 
	 Research & Development
	  				  			
	 •   Pilot plants, sensory, pkg. lab, customer service center and general facilities
	  	 	12/31/14	  	  	 	43,833	  
	 QA Lab Services
	  				  			
	 •   Lab testing services performed and/or management at WW
	  	 	12/31/14	  	  	 	20,000
Director, Airport Compliance and Management Analysis 

Federal Aviation Commission 

800 Independence Ave SW 

Washington DC 20591 

Re: City of King Action Plan for FAA Policy Change 79FR66282-0l; Docket FAA 2013-0988 

Dear Mr. Fiertz: 

This letter is being submitted in response to the above referenced FAA policy change. It is unclear 

whether the policy applies to the City of King, but out of abundance of caution please accept this as 

the confinnation and an Action Plan for the future regarding the expenditure of any revenues 

generated by our airport. 

City of King is a small municipality in Southern Monterey County with a population of just over 

12,000 people. We do have an airfield (Mesa Del Rey Airport) where aviation fuel is sold. Under 

the agreement with the operator of the fuel dispensary City receives a small commission on all sales. 

The revenue to the City averages around $100.00 per month. All of those funds are deposited in the 

special airport fund and used only for Airport purposes, in apparent compliance with the new FAA 

policy. These revenues will continue to be used solely for airport purposes 

City of King has no way of separating and specifically identifying any potential tax revenue from 

those sales, if any are actually received by the city and not exempted as pre 1987 revenues, but the 

amounts if any would be nominal. 

I trust that this letter is sufficient to meet the requirements for submission of an Action Plan by the 

City of King. Please contact me should you require any further information or if additional steps 

need to be taken by the City. 

Sincerely, 

Steve Adams 

City Manager 

212 S . VANDERHURST AVENUE • KING CITY , CA 93930 

PHONE: (831) 385-3281 • FAX: (831) 385-6887 

WWW.KINGCITY.COM
### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGIONS 1595 Wynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202-1129 Phone 800-227-8917 http://www.epa.gov/region08 

### AUG - 1 2012 Ref: 8P-AR CERTIFIED MAIL

- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED & ELECTRONIC MAIL David Clark Safety/ Environmental Director Petro-Hunt, LLC 1601 Elm Street, Suite 3400 Dallas, Texas 75201 RE: Actual Notice for Approval and Promulgation of Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities DearMr. Clark, This is to notify you that the EPAhas issued a temporary interim final rule promulgating a reservationspecific Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) inorder to regulate emissions from oil andnatural gas production facilities located on the Fort BertholdIndian Reservation (FBIR). The FIP includes basic air quality regulations for the protection ofcommunities in and adjacent to the FBIR TheFIPrequires owners and operators ofoil and natural gas production facilities to reduce emissions ofvolatile organic compounds emanating from well completions, recompletions, and production and storage operations. The agency proposed a reservation-specific FIP concurrently with this interim final rule. The rule is effective with this actual notice to Petro-Hunt, LLC for purposes ofenforcement beginning at 5p.m. (eastern daylight time) onAugust 3, 2012. We will accept comments on the proposed rule for 45 days from the date ofpublication inthe Federal Register. The EPA Administrator, LisaJackson, signedthe interim final rule onAugust 1,2012, and the agency is submitting it for publication in the Federal Register (FR).A copy ofthe signed interim final rule is enclosed withthis letter. The version ofthe enclosed rule serves as the official version for purposes ofcompliance until the interim final rule is published in the FR. Please refer to the published version in a forthcoming FRpublication, which will appear onthe Government Printing Office's FDsys website (http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action) and on Regulations.gov (http://www.regulations.gov) in DocketNo. EPA-R08-0AR-2012-0479. Ifyou have any questions onthe interim final rule, please contact Deirdre Rothery at (303) 312-6431.

Carl Daly, Director Air Program Enclosures



### 2 

# * Printedon RecycledPaper
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           List of Subsidiaries


LEC Leasing, Inc.; incorporated in the State of Nevada on May 7, 1998; doing
business as LEC Leasing, Inc.

LEC Distribution, Inc.; incorporated in the State of Nevada on June 23, 1998;
doing business as LEC Distribution, Inc.

Pacific Mountain Computer Products, Inc.; incorporated in the State of
California on June 22, 1978; and doing business as Pacific Mountain Computer
Products, Inc.

TJ Computer Services, Inc.; incorporated in the State of New York on March 4,
1980; and doing business as Leasing Edge Corporation.

Superior Computer Systems, Inc.; incorporated in the State of Minnesota on
January 13, 1995; and doing business as Superior Computer Systems, Inc.

Atlantic Digital International, Inc.; incorporated in the State of Nevada on
November 10, 1997; and doing business as Atlantic Digital International, Inc.

Traditions Acquisition Corporation; incorporated in the State of Georgia on
April 27, 1999; and doing business as Traditions Golf Club.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
   As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated February 26, 1999 and to all references to our
Firm, included in this Form 10-K, into Weeks Corporation's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-18305 and 333-1108) and Form
S-3 (File Nos. 333-1106, 33-96534, 333-32755, 333-42821 and 333-50871).
 
                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Atlanta, Georgia
March 26, 1999