alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.3 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of DiamondCluster International, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, William R. McClayton,
Chief Administrative Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ William R. McClayton William R. McClayton
Chief Administrative Officer
June 10, 2005
* This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50084 Conference Calendar

KELGER KING, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus K. LOVE, Doctor, Boyd Unit; M. Wright, PA, Boyd Unit; Jay T. Morgan, Warden, Boyd Unit; UNIDENTIFIED BROOKS, Nurse, Boyd Unit; J. NEIHMAS, Nurse, Boyd Unit; UNIDENTIFIED JONES, Nurse, Boyd Unit, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-96-CV-82

- - - - - - - - - - February 11, 1999 Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. *
PER CURIAM: ** Kelger King, Texas prisoner # 628021, is BARRED from proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”) because, on at least three prior occasions while incarcerated, King has brought an action or appeal in a United States court that was dismissed as frivolous.No. 98-50084 -2- See Ruiz, et al. and King v. Estelle , No. 96-20163 (5th Cir. Apr. 2, 1997)(unpublished)(appeal dismissed as frivolous); King v.
Scott , No. 97-40447 (5th Cir. Aug. 15, 1997) (unpublished) (complaint dismissed as frivolous in the district court; appeal dismissed as frivolous); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Adepegba
v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, King’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED, and he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This appeal is DISMISSED. King has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal.
IFP DECERTIFIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 
  Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 
  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John G. Robertson, President and Chief Executive Officer
  of Reg Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Amendment No. 1 to Form 20-F of Reg
  Technologies Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies
  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
  of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
  of Reg Technologies Inc.

|Richmond, BC, Canada                 
|-------------------------------------
|by: /s/ John G. Robertson            
|June 30, 2006                        
|John G. Robertson                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Reg Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Reg Technologies
  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
  request.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael W. Myers, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.), rendered February 25, 1988, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus which was to suppress a statement made by him to the police.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court did not err in denying suppression of the defendant’s postarrest statement. The police officer’s stop of the defendant’s automobile two days after the shooting of the victim was based upon reasonable suspicion *(see, People v De Bour,*40 NY2d 210, 223) inasmuch as the vehicle precisely matched a witness’s description of the car used in the shooting *(see, People v Salvaty,*163 AD2d 494; *People v Byrd,*156 AD2d 374). In addition, after the stop the defendant informed the officer that his name was Rudolph Bailey, an alias known to be used by him and which was printed on his automobile registration. The defendant’s girlfriend also told police that the defendant drove a vehicle matching the description of the one stopped and that the defendant had been involved in a shooting. These factors elevated the level of suspicion to probable cause and justified the defendant’s arrest *(see, People v Salvaty, supra; People v Byrd, supra; People v White,*117 AD2d 127, 131).

The defendant claims that the police, who falsely stated that there were people who could place him at the scene of the shooting, created a substantial risk that he would incriminate himself, thereby rendering his confession involuntary. This claim is without merit since the police had a reasonable basis to believe that there were people who could place the defendant at the scene of the crime and the police conduct was not so fundamentally unfair as to deny him due process *633
      *(see, People v Tarsia,*50 NY2d 1, 11; *People v Peters,*157 AD2d 806, 807-808; *People v Lewis,*122 AD2d 426, 427).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Intelligence AgencyCOMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN DEFENSE OF THE NATION

Search
Search

Search
                    - Facilities Operating Status
                    - Employee Resources

-  Home		 
-  About    -  FAQs             
  -  Organization      -  Locations             
    -  Missile and Space Intelligence Center             
    -  Joint Military Attache School             
    -  Joint Military Intelligence Training Center 
  -  Office of the Inspector General             
  -  Equal Opportunity & Diversity             
  -  Military Integration Office             
  -  History      -  DIA Museum             
    -  George Washington Letters             
    -  Directors of DIA             
    -  The Historians 
  -  Patriots Memorial             
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response             
  -  Contact Us 
-  News & Features    -  Articles             
  -  Videos             
  -  DIA in the News             
  -  Threat Reports             
  -  Photo Gallery             
  -  No FEAR             
  -  Podcasts             
  -  DIA Comics 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Career Fields      -  Analysis             
    -  Counterintelligence             
    -  Finance & Acquisition             
    -  Human Intelligence             
    -  Human Services             
    -  Information Technology             
    -  Inspector General             
    -  Legal             
    -  Mission Management             
    -  Office Management & Infrastructure             
    -  Science & Technology             
    -  Security 
  -  Search Vacancies             
  -  Apply to DIA             
  -  Hiring Process             
  -  Internships             
  -  Veteran Programs 
-  Business    -  Contractor Personnel Security             
  -  SIA3             
  -  SITE III             
  -  Innovation             
  -  NeedipeDIA             
  -  Office of Small Business Programs             
  -  Small Business FAQs 

HOMENEWS & FEATURES

Search

Search

                            - All Images 
                            - Other 

                            - Upload Date
                            - Photo Date
                            - Title

-  FIRST 
-   
-   
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
-   
-   
-  LAST
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.09 MB)

Tags:Construction & Equipment, special operational equipment, DLA Troop Support, EOD

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1

SECURE NetCheckIn INC.

A Nevada corporation

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brandi L. DeFoor, Chief Executive Officer and President of SECURE NetCheckIn Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)

The report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

SECURE NetCheckIn INC.

Dated: December 3, 2012

By:

  /s/ *Brandi L. DeFoor*

 

 

Brandi L. DeFoor

 

 

President & Chief Executive Officer |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Sector 10, Inc. (fna SKRM Interactive, Inc).; on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Laurence A. Madison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: July 14, 2008

| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ LAURENCE A. MADISON
| |     | Laurence A. Madison    
| |     | Chief Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.23 MB)

Tags:DSCC, DLA Land & Maritime, Navy Rear Adm. John King, DLA Land and Maritime Commander, columbus, EVENT, People and Culture

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Phillip Boyd Cashion, Appellant

No. 06-19-00088-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 28167). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Phillip Boyd Cashion, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 4, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), We, Clark M. Mower, our Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas N. Strong, our Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in our Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our financial condition and result of operations.  Dated: April 15, 2011                        /s/Clark M. Mower Clark M. Mower Chief Executive Officer    Dated:  April 15, 2011                         /s/Thomas N. Strong Thomas N. Strong Chief Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.4 MB)

Tags:DSCC, DLA Land & Maritime, Strategic engagement, Process excellence, columbus

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Board of Directors Meeting

Wednesday, December 8, 2021

This event is closed to the public

An information summary for the below listed project can be found on dfc.gov

Meeting Agenda

 

I. CHAIRMAN OPENS MEETING

II. REPORTS

a. Management Report

b. Equity: Introduction of New Leadership and strategic approach

III. PROJECT APPROVALS

a. LCP Fund II Cooperatief U.A.

Equity

IV. ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS

a. Dividend to Treasury

b. Minutes – September 9, 2021, DFC Board of Directors Meeting 

V. PRESENTATIONS

a. Audi Committee Report

Chris Vincze, Audit Committee Chair

Location: Meeting will be held via videoconference
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

ALLEN RAY JORDAN, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10393 

D.C. No. 2:96-cr-00475-GEB 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 10, 2018**

Before: CANBY, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Allen Ray Jordan appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion 

for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review discretionary denials of sentence reduction motions 

for abuse of discretion, see United States v. Chaney, 581 F.3d 1123, 1125 (9th Cir. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 11 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-10393 

2009), and we affirm.

Jordan argues that the district court erred by failing to consider adequately 

his amended Guidelines range and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, and 

by insufficiently explaining its decision. We disagree. The district court 

acknowledged the reduced Guidelines range and Jordan’s eligibility for a 

reduction. The court then discussed its reasons for denying the reduction in light 

of the section 3553(a) factors. On this record, we conclude that the court properly 

considered the section 3553(a) factors and adequately explained the sentence. See 

Chavez-Meza v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1959, 1965 (2018).

Jordan also contends that the denial of his motion was substantively 

unreasonable in light of his post-sentencing rehabilitation and other mitigating 

factors. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. Jordan’s 

360-month sentence is not substantively unreasonable in light of the section 

3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the 

nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the 

defendant. See United States v. Dunn, 728 F.3d 1151, 1159 (9th Cir. 2013).

AFFIRMED.