alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.6 MB)

Tags:HADR, nepal earthquake, World Food Programme, British aid, MULTINATIONAL, MV-22 osprey , Disaster relief , Humanitarian aid, aircraft, Joint Operations

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Docket Number: FAA-2013-0539
Use these columns for Use these columns for 

Special, Incentive, and Bonus elections: Base Pay elections:

If your Roth 

election % is:

The the 

maximum % you 

can elect to 

contribute to 

traditional is:

If your Roth 

election % is:

The maximum % 

you can elect to 

contribute to 

traditional is:

65 0 65 0

64 2 64 0

63 3 63 0

62 5 62 0

61 6 61 0

60 8 60 0

59 9 59 1

58 11 58 3

57 12 57 4

56 14 56 6

55 15 55 7

54 17 54 9

53 18 53 10

52 20 52 12

51 22 51 14

50 23 50 15

49 25 49 17

48 26 48 18

47 28 47 20

46 29 46 21

45 31 45 23

44 32 44 24

43 34 43 26

42 35 42 27

41 37 41 29

40 38 40 30

39 40 39 32

38 42 38 34

37 43 37 35

36 45 36 37

35 46 35 38

34 48 34 40

33 49 33 41

32 51 32 43

Maximum Traditional TSP Percentage Available after Roth

Find how much you are currently contributing to Roth in the first column and the second 

column shows how much you can contribute to traditional TSP.
31 52 31 44

30 54 30 46

29 55 29 47

28 57 28 49

27 58 27 50

26 60 26 52

25 62 25 54

24 63 24 55

23 65 23 57

22 66 22 58

21 68 21 60

20 69 20 61

19 71 19 63

18 72 18 64

17 74 17 66

16 75 16 67

15 77 15 69

14 78 14 70

13 80 13 72

12 82 12 74

11 83 11 75

10 85 10 77 9 86 9 78 8 88 8 80 7 89 7 81 6 91 6 83 5 92 5 84 4 94 4 86 3 95 3 87 2 97 2 89 1 98 1 90 0 100 0 92
#### In the Matter of Willie M. Adams, Appellant, v Westchester County Jail Time Allowance Committee et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the recomputation of jail time credit to the petitioner, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered May 20, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf, People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 170 (Friday, August 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44627-44628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18997]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the

[[Page 44628]]

assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of 
a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking 
companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies 
listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 27, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (David L. Hubbard, Senior 
Manager) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034. Comments can 
also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#62210d0f0f070c16114c0312120e0b0103160b0d0c112211160e114c0410004c0d1005"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c3f1311111912080f521d0c0c10151f1d081513120f3c0f08100f521a0e1e52130e1b">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Summit Bancshares, Inc., Chesterfield, Missouri; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
The Bank of Houston, Houston, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 28, 
2018.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-18997 Filed 8-30-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
S. Con. Res. 11 Agreed to March 25, 2013

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from 

Friday, March 22, 2013 through Tuesday, March 26, 2013, on 

a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 

Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned 

until 12:00 noon on Monday, April 8, 2013, or such other time 

on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his 

designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time 

of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns 

on Monday, March 25, 2013, on a motion offered pursuant to 

this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, 

it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 9, 2013, or 

until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 

concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first. 

SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker 

of the House, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 

consultation with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the 

Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the 

Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble at such place and 

time as they may designate if, in their opinion, the public interest 

shall warrant it. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
6/1/2011Number of units meeting the current level of the proposed standards:Units meeting “Lignite” Hg beyond-thefloorRespective Hg + PM+ HCl floor“Bituminous/subbituminous” Hg floor PM floor HCl floorExisting source 3 39 151 161 180New source* 3 0 4 18 14* Units meeting new-source floor on a lb/MWhor lb/GWh basis based on 2010 ICR dataCurrent proposed standards:MACT floor “Lignite” Hg beyond-thefloor“Bituminous/subbituminous”Hg floorPM floor HCl floorExisting source 4 lb/TBtu 1.20 lb/TBtu 0.03 lb/MMBtu 0.002 lb/MMBtuNew source 0.04 lb/GWh(4 lb/TBtu)0.0002 lb/GWh(0.0185 lb/TBtu)0.05 lb/MWh(0.02 lb/MMBtu)0.3 lb/GWh(0.00005 lb/MMBtu)
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




2016 Short Term Incentive Plan Guidelines





Each year the Compensation Committee of the Board (“the Committee”) will approve the
employees of Group 1 who are eligible for participation in the Short Term Incentive Plan (“the
Plan”) for the year.




Incentive compensation levels of the Plan for each individual will be stated as a percentage
of the participating employee’s base compensation in effect when the Plan is approved by the
Committee.




For Vice Presidents and above, incentive compensation levels of the Plan will be based upon
both financial-based and mission-based goals for the Plan year as established by the
Committee.




	 	 	 	– Up to 60% of the incentive award will be based on an established financial goal
(EPS target). The EPS target will equate to the Company’s adjusted EPS as disclosed in
its fourth quarter earnings release as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.






	 	 	 	– Up to 50% of the incentive award will be based on mission-based goals
established at the beginning of each year. The mission-based bonus will only be funded
if the Company achieves a minimum EPS of $6.50.






	 	 	 	– The mission-based and financial-based portions of the bonus can be awarded
independently so that achievement of one is not predicated on the achievement of the
other.






For Employees hired during a Plan year, the Committee will have complete discretion as to the
extent of participation in the Plan, if any, by the new hire.




Employees who resign their positions with Group 1 will not be entitled to participate
in the Plan for the year in which the resignation occurs.




Employees who resign their positions with Group 1 after the end of a Plan year, but
before the actual payment of the incentive compensation amounts will be entitled to payment
for the Plan year for which they were employed.




Incentive Compensation earned for the Plan year will be paid after completion of the Company’s
audit and announcement of earnings for that year.




In the event of a material restatement of the Company’s financial statement due to an error,
the Committee may, in its discretion, either make additional payment to or seek to recover the
cash amount by which the individual employee’s bonus is affected based on the restated
financial results.




The Committee has sole authority to administer, modify or change the Plan, including but not
limited to, adjusting actual performance criteria for Plan purposes for extraordinary or
unusual items included in actual operating results, or when the company fails to meet
financial objectives.
AOP Limits in Red

Pitch Fume Treatment System

TEST DATE Test By

Green Mix 

Usage 

(st/hr)

Stack Gas 

Airflow 

(dscf/min)

Stack Gas 

Airflow 

(acf/min)

Methods 

Used

lb/hr 

<2.36 lb/day gr/dscf <0.1 lb/ton ga lb/hr <0.54 lb/day lb/ton ga gr/dscf 

<0.1

11/10/09 43872 47765 1.342 0.182

11/11/09 Golden 45621 49229 5 / 315 1.319 0.118

11/11/19 43501 46971 1.155 0.092

Average 44332 47988 1.272 0.0033 0.131 0.00034

Part. (PM) MCEM Results

C:\PROGRA~1\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\2425112060913106464\0900006480f6ea23.xlsx 11/17/2011
Page 3 of 5

 Effects Division) to Jackson, S., (Registration Division) and, Redden, J. (Health 

 and Effects Division). Dated October 20, 2008. 

USEPA 2003. Memorandum: Quinoxyfen-Health Effects Division (HED) Metabolism 

 Assessment Review Committee (MARC) Decision Document. From Kramer, G., 

 and Sutton, C. (Environmental Fate and Effects Division) to Donovan, Y. (Health 

 Effects Division) March 26, 2003. 

 
Page 4 of 5

Appendix I 

Tier 1 groundwater estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) for quinoxyfen, 

resulting from its use on cherries were derived with PRZM-GW (Pesticide Root Zone 

Model for Groundwater, version 1.0, August 31, 2012). PRZM-GW is a one-dimensional, 

finite-difference model that estimates the concentrations of pesticides in groundwater. It 

accounts for pesticide fate in the crop root zone by simulating pesticide transport and 

degradation through the soil profile after a pesticide is applied to an agricultural field. 

PRZM-GW was used for up to 100 years of quinoxyfen application in three standard 

scenarios: NC cotton, WI corn and FL potato. Each scenario was representing a different 

region known to be vulnerable to groundwater contaminations. The input parameters are 

found in Table 1. PRZM-GW output values represent pesticide concentrations in a 

vulnerable groundwater supply that is located directly beneath a rural agricultural field 

(Table 2). The results show the peak values in NC cotton and FL potato scenarios but not 

in the WI corn scenario. In addition, because if the high Koc of the chemical the 

breakthrough was not observed. Therefore, EFED recommends using EDWCs from SCIGROW. 

Table 1. PRZM-GW Input Parameters 

Parameter (units) Input Value 

Application Rate (lbs a.i./A) 0.114 

Number of Applications 5 

Applications Date(s) (month-day) 4-30; 5-7; 5-1; 5-21; 5-28 

Annual Application Retreatment Once every year 

Hydrolysis 0 

Soil Metabolism Half-life (days) 400 (90th percentile) 

Koc (mL/goc) 47513.1 (average) 

Table 2. PRZM-GW Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations in Groundwater 

Resulting from the Use of Quinoxyfen. 

Crop/Scenario Highest daily 

Value (μg/L)

Post Breakthrough 

Average (μg/L)

Average 

Simulation 

Breakthrough 

Time (days)

NC cotton 5.41 x10-13 Incomplete Incomplete

WI corn 0 Incomplete Incomplete

FL Potato 1.09 x10-7 Incomplete Incomplete

 
Page 5 of 5

Attachment I and II 

Drinking Water Assessment (DP 351023) 

055459 D351023 

DWA 2008

MARC memo 2003 

MARC memo 2003
' . 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MAGORIEN HONING & HYDRAULICS 

FAA DOCKET NO. (not assigned) 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0908 

FAA CASE NO. 2011WP910318 

RECEIVED 

DEC 18 2012 

HEARING DOCKET 

'"'"''"" 

RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

Respondent, Magorien Honing & Hydraulics, by its undersigned counsel, hereby 

responds to the November 28,2012 Order to Respondent to Show Cause (the "OSC") as 

follows: 

1. The Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") served its Complaint 

in this matter on October 4, 2012, by U.S. certified mail. See Complainant's November 

9, 2012 Motion to Deem the Allegations in the Complaint Admitted, etc. ("Motion"), 

para. 3. 

2. By virtue of the foregoing service date, Respondent's Answer was required 

to be served no later than November 9, 2012. See Motion, para. 3. 

3. Respondent's Answer was timely served by U.S. certified mail on 

November 8, 2012. See Attachment 1 (Answer to Complaint with Certificate of Service 

and certified mail receipts showing service by U.S. certified mail on November 8, 2012). 

4. Despite filing the Motion, Complainant's counsel now acknowledges that 

the Answer was timely~ See Attachment 2 (November 15, 2012 email from 
Complainant's counsel to Respondent's counsel). 

5. Based on the foregoing circumstances, Respondent respectfully submits 

that good cause has been shown why the relief requested in the Motion should not be 

granted. 

Dated: December 10, 2012 

2 

Respectfully submitted, 

LAW OFFICE OF DOUG GRIFFITH 

Doug Griffith, Esq. 

Counsel for Respondent 

633 W. 5th St., Ste. 2800 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Tel. 213-223-2092 I Fax 213-814-4530 

Email: doug@douggriffithlaw.com 

•,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           89546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       5610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 98556
<PP&E>                                           87797
<DEPRECIATION>                                   27653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  158700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            23438
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         12454
<OTHER-SE>                                      122808
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    158700
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                893394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (895509)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (895509)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (895509)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.08)


</TABLE>
### EMPM 04
- 28

- 15

Karen MiliansInput Values

 Water body type is highlighted when incorrect  Volatilization routine  Addition of Henry’s constant  Batch Runs were modified  Reorganized application method buttons  GUI is bigger Ability to run ground waterOutput values

 Whole new page of optional outputs  Hydrology  Including volatilization flux  Decay in field  Word file output for degradates  Updated GW output  Option box for DEEM and CALENDEXCode changes  Bug fixes  Sediment units were corrected  Maximum total application per year  Isotherm bug fix  Flux calculations  No longer supporting PE5 files Ability to do PRZM runs only  Run button says “wait” during run time and “try again” after an error Added ESA batch run capability The SGWC will be release in June.  It will have new features (GW, volatilization routine, etc.)
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

University of Texas Health Science Center 

at Tyler, Appellant

No. 06-16-00083-CV v.

Khurram Nawab, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 

2 of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

2015-680-CCL2). Opinion delivered by 

Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was error in the judgment of 

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and render a judgment

dismissing Nawab’s suit.

We further order that the appellee, Khurram Nawab, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 21, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.09 MB)

Tags:Atlas V, CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, LAUNCH

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery