alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23


<PAGE>


                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S CONSENT






The Board of Directors and Stockholders
SWVA Bancshares, Inc.


         We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
on Form S-8, of our report  dated July 22,  1998,  relating to the  consolidated
balance sheets of SWVA  Bancshares,  Inc. and subsidiary as of June 30, 1998 and
1997 and the related consolidated  statements of income,  stockholders'  equity,
and cash flows for the years then ended,  which  report  appears in the June 30,
1998 annual report on Form 10-KSB of SWVA Bancshares, Inc.






                                          /s/ Cherry Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. 
                                          ------------------------------------ 
                                          Cherry Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P


Lynchburg, Virginia
September 25, 1998




                        Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.
   828 Main Street, 17th Floor (24504) - P.O. Box 1119 - Lynchburg, VA 24505
                     - (804) 847-6643 - Fax (804) 528-3605
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report ofDiscount Coupons Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I,Pat
Martin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated this 18th day of September 2014 | /s/ Pat Martin         
|------------------------------------- | -----------------------
|                                      | Pat Martin             
|                                      | Chief Executive Officer
Board of Directors Meeting

Wednesday, June 9, 2021

This event is closed to the public

An information summary for the below listed project can be found on dfc.gov

Meeting Agenda

 

I. CHAIRMAN OPENS MEETING

II. MANAGEMENT REPORT

III. PROJECT APPROVALS

a. Avaada Sunrays Energy Private Limited

Structured Finance

IV. ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS

a. Minutes – March 9, 2021, DFC Board of Directors Meeting 

V. PRESENTATIONS

a. Development Advisory Council Report to the Board

Mr. Robert Mosbacher, Development Advisory Council

b. Audi Committee Report

Chris Vincze, Audit Committee Chair

Location: Meeting will be held via videoconference
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.4 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.24 MB)

Tags:culture, dla, Pearl Harbor: DSCC, columbus, EXCELLENCE, command , land and maritime, People, Sailors, Navy 

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EX-10.17.7



 Exhibit 10.17.7 

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE TRUST AGREEMENT UNDER THE 

CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY 
 GRANTOR TRUST AGREEMENT

         WHEREAS, Phillips Petroleum Company (now ConocoPhillips Company) (hereinafter
“Company”) and Wachovia Bank, National Association (now Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) (the “Trustee”) entered into an amended and restated trust agreement as of June 1, 1998, subsequently amended as of May 3, 1999, as of
January 15, 2002, and as of October 5, 2006 (the “Trust Agreement”) establishing a trust (the “Trust”) for the purpose of holding monies and other property in connection with certain nonqualified deferred compensation
plans maintained by the Company (the “Plans”); and 
         WHEREAS, pursuant to
Section 14(a) of the Trust Agreement, the Trust Agreement may be amended by a written instrument executed by the Trustee and the Company; 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, the Trust Agreement is amended, effective May 1, 2012 as follow: 
  

	 	1.	Section 5(a) of the Trust Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety to provide as follows: 

  

	 	“(a)	Except as provided in Sections 2(c), 3, 5(b), 8(a) and 14(f), the Company shall have no right or power to direct the Trustee to return to the Company or to divert to others any of the Trust assets before all payment of
benefits have been made to the Participants and Beneficiaries pursuant to the terms of the Arrangements.” 

  

	 	2.	A new Subsection 14(f) is added to the Trust Agreement to provide as follows: 

  

	 	“(f)	In connection with the April 30, 2012 corporate spinoff of Phillips 66 from ConocoPhillips, the Company shall have the right and power to direct the Trustee to transfer Trust assets to trusts established by
Phillips 66 or its subsidiaries for the benefit of Plan Participants and Beneficiaries whose employment and Plan liabilities are transferred to Phillips 66 or its subsidiaries.” 


The Trust Agreement is in all other respects ratified and confirmed without amendment. 

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment to the Trust Agreement has been executed on behalf of the
parties hereto on the day and year first above written. 
  

									
	 CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY
	 		 	WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
					
	By:	 	/s/ Frances M. Vallejo	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Alan C. Frazier
					
	Its:	 	Vice President and Treasurer	 		 	Its:	 	Senior Vice President

  

									
	 ATTEST
	 		 	ATTEST
					
	By:	 	/s/ Leisa C. Munoz	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Tracy C. Hartsell
					
	Its:	 	Assistant Secretary	 		 	Its:	 	Vice President
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 15-1462

___________

WILLIAM STAPLES,

Appellant

v.

WARDEN SCHUYLKILL FCI

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil Action No. 13-cv-01991)

District Judge: Honorable William J. Nealon, Jr.

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

August 14, 2015

Before: FUENTES, SHWARTZ and ROTH, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed November 2, 2015)

___________

OPINION*

___________

PER CURIAM

 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
2

William Staples appeals the District Court’s order denying his petition for a writ 

of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. For the reasons below, we will 

affirm the District Court’s order.

The procedural history of this case and the details of Staples’s claims are well 

known to the parties, set forth in the District Court’s thorough memorandum, and need 

not be discussed at length. Briefly, Staples, a federal prisoner, filed a § 2241 petition in 

which he challenged the loss of good time credits imposed for three disciplinary 

incidents. The District Court denied the petition, and Staples filed a timely notice of 

appeal. 

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and review the District Court’s 

denial of federal habeas relief de novo. Denny v. Schultz, 708 F.3d 140, 143 (3d Cir. 

2013). A decision to revoke good time credits must be supported by some evidence. 

Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454 (1985). “Ascertaining whether this standard is 

satisfied does not require examination of the entire record, independent assessment of the 

credibility of witnesses, or weighing of the evidence. Instead, the relevant question is 

whether there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by 

the disciplinary board.” Id. at 455-56. Due process entitles prisoners to advance written 

notice of disciplinary charges and a written statement by the factfinder of the evidence 

relied upon and the reasons for the action taken. Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-

64 (1974). Prisoners may call witnesses and present evidence as long as it would not be 

hazardous to prison safety or correctional goals. Id. at 566. 
3

The District Court set forth in detail the factual background and procedural history 

of the three disciplinary charges Staples is challenging and performed a thorough analysis 

of Staples’s claims. We agree with the District Court that there was some evidence to 

support the hearing officers’ decisions to revoke Staples’s good time credits and Staples 

was not denied due process. The District Court did not err in denying Staples’s § 2241 

petition.

For the reasons above, as well as those set forth by the District Court, we will 

affirm the District Court’s order.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Jiminez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Murray Mogel, J.), rendered May 3, 1990, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him as a predicate felon to concurrent terms of *&V2*to 9 years, and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

*368Police officers, in the early morning hours, observed defendant hand a tinfoil packet to another person in exchange for money, near double-parked cars and in the presence of onlookers. As police approached, defendant dropped a brown paper bag and walked off quickly. When defendant was apprehended, he struggled and hit the arresting officer at least twice. The brown bag was recovered and found to contain tinfoil packets of cocaine. Defendant’s neighbor testified that police officers attacked the defendant after he exited from a cab for no reason and that there were other persons selling drugs in the area earlier in the day. The trial court, however, precluded both cross-examination of police officers and direct testimony from the defense witness concerning the fact that drug dealers often stashed their drugs in the location of the arrest. The court’s preclusion of the evidence that drug dealers often hid their drugs in the location of defendant’s arrest was not an abuse of discretion. While the defendant has a right to introduce evidence that a third party committed the crime *(Chambers v Mississippi,*410 US 284), the prospective evidence must do more than raise a mere suspicion that a third party committed the crime. There must be a clear connection between that specified third party and the crime *(see, People v Austin,*112 AD2d 242; *People v Aulet,*111 AD2d 822, *lv denied*66 NY2d 761). Defendant in the present case did not make an adequate offer of proof, and his appellate stance is sheer speculation.

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

RE:                           Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SandRidge Permian Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)                                     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|                  | /s/ Sarah   Newell                                                                          |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Sarah   Newell                                                                              |
|                  | Vice   President                                                                            |
|                  | The Bank   of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,

as   Trustee of SandRidge Permian Trust |
|                  |                                                                                        |
| August 8,   2019 |                                                                                        |

 

----
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ENV-A 2700 AND THE AGENCY'S RESPONSE 

THERETO 

Comment: EPA expressed concern about the exemption for chutes, bins, feeders, 

and conveyors from the fugitive emission control system. 

DES Response: DES expanded the section on fugitive dust to clarify that any dust 

emissions from chutes, bins, feeders, and conveyors must be controlled. These devices 

are exempt from the fugitive emission control system, however, because the system is not 

designed to capture dust from these sources. It is attached to the mixer and dryer exhaust 

and works by creating negative air pressure to capture fugitive emissions in the system's 

ducts. 

Comment: EPA also suggested changes to the language on visible emissions, stating 

that the proposed language "is open to interpretations not intended by NH DES." 

EPA's wording would put an upper limit of 40 % on opacity and add a condition 

that any "malfunction was not caused, entirely or in part, by poor maintenance, 

careless operation, poor design or any other reasonably preventable condition." 

DES Response: EPA's proposed opacity cap during the 6-minute opacity exemption 

period was not included in the final rule for the following reasons . First, the 6-minute 

exemption applies during periods of operation (startup, shutdown, or malfunction) during 

which time it may not be possible to control the opacity level. For example, high opacity 

during a "cold" startup can be caused by cold equipment temperatures quenching 

combustion and higher levels of excess air during the initial the periods of combustion 

where the combustion conditions are very dynamic. During such a period, DES believes 

that it is not possible to control opacity levels . Limiting the exemption period to 6-

minutes per hour in and of itself adequately protects the particulate standard. Second, 

this change would result in an increased burden on permitted sources to report and on the 

department to respond to permit deviation reports, most of which would involve shortterm spikes that would not be worth pursuing for enforcement purposes and would not 

provide any significant environmental benefit. 

EPA's additional language regarding malfunctions was not included because DES' 

definition of "malfunction" in Env-A 101 .69 quotes EPA's definition in 40 CFR §60 .2 

and, therefore, should be sufficient .
- - 1

Defense Finance and Accounting Service 

Contract Management Team (CMT) 

Directions 

Directions to use contract/order number or cage 

code to find its DCMA office and ACO information. 

11/25/2019 Integrity Service Innovation 
- -

 

CMT Lookup Directions 

Enter 

https://pubmini. 

dcma.mil in 

address bar 

Click “I ACCEPT THESE TERMS” 

11/25/2019 Integrity Service Innovation 2 
- -

 

CMT Lookup Directions 

Click “Log in using my CAC or PIV Card” 

11/25/2019 Integrity Service Innovation 3 
- -

 

CMT Lookup Directions 

• Select your 

email certificate 

• Click “OK” or 

press “Enter” 

11/25/2019 Integrity Service Innovation 4 
- -

 

CMT Lookup Directions 

• Enter either a Contract/Order 

Number or Cage code 

• Click “Search” or press “Enter” 

11/25/2019 Integrity Service Innovation 5 
- -

 

 

CMT Lookup Directions 

This page will give the DCMA Office and ACO 

for the Contract/Order Number or Cage code 

The ACO information includes their: 

• Name 

• E-mail Address 

• Telephone Number 

11/25/2019 Integrity Service Innovation 6
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 28, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 28, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0066. TIMIS VASILE et al. v. ENOCH ADDO.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

15C04688
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidus Investment
Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward H. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and I, Cary L. Schaefer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                                             
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: May 2, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ EDWARD H. ROSS                          
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Edward H. Ross                              
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer        
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                  |  |  | 
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ CARY L. SCHAEFER                        
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Cary L. Schaefer                            
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)