Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules 3935 

question or complain about this 

proposed rule or any policy or action of 

the Coast Guard. 

4. Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

5. Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this proposed rule under that 

Order and have determined that it does 

not have implications for federalism. 

6. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule will not result in such an 

expenditure, we do discuss the effects of 

this proposed rule elsewhere in this 

preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

10. Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant energy action’’ under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guides the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions which do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. This proposed 

rule promulgates the operating 

regulations or procedures for 

drawbridges. This rule is categorically 

excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph 

(32)(e), of the Instruction. 

Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of 

the Instruction, an environmental 

analysis checklist and a categorical 

exclusion determination are not 

required for this rule. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this 

proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 

Bridges. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows: 

PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE 

OPERATION REGULATIONS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 117 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Revise § 117.1005 to read as 

follows: 

§ 117.1005 Chincoteague Channel. 

The draw of the SR 175 Bridge, mile 

3.5, at Chincoteague shall open on 

demand; except from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. on 

the last consecutive Wednesday and 

Thursday in July the bridge need not 

open. 

Dated: January 8, 2015. 

Stephen P. Metruck, 

Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard, 

Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01333 Filed 1–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2011–0033; FRL–9921–78– 

Region 6] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of New 

Mexico; Revisions to the State 

Implementation Plan; General 

Definitions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

revisions to the New Mexico State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) related to the 

General Definitions section of the New 

Mexico SIP that were submitted by the 

State of New Mexico on June 11, 2009. 

EPA has evaluated the SIP revisions for 

New Mexico and determined these 

revisions are consistent with the 

requirements of the Clean Air Act (Act 

or CAA). EPA is proposing approval 

under section 110 of the Act. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before February 25, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to 

Ms. Tracie Donaldson, Air Permits 

Section (6PD–R), Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

Comments may also be submitted 

electronically or through hand delivery/ 

courier by following the detailed 

instructions in the ADDRESSES section of 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
3936 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

the direct final rule located in the rules 

section of this Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Tracie Donaldson, (214) 665–6633; 

email address donaldson.tracie@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

SIP submittal as a direct rule without 

prior proposal because the Agency 

views this as noncontroversial submittal 

and anticipates no adverse comments. A 

detailed rationale for the approval is set 

forth in the direct final rule. If no 

relevant adverse comments are received 

in response to this action no further 

activity is contemplated. If EPA receives 

relevant adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

For additional information, see the 

direct final rule which is located in the 

rules section of this Federal Register. 

Dated: January 6, 2015. 

Ron Curry, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00773 Filed 1–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 271 

[EPA–R04–RCRA–2014–0710; FRL–9921– 

91–Region 4] 

Georgia: Final Authorization of State 

Hazardous Waste Management 

Program Revisions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: Georgia has applied to the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

for final authorization of changes to its 

hazardous waste program under the 

Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act (RCRA). These changes correspond 

to certain Federal rules promulgated 

between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2011 

(also known as RCRA Clusters XVIII 

through XXI). With this proposed rule, 

EPA is proposing to grant final 

authorization to Georgia for these 

changes. 

DATES: Comments must be received in 

writing by February 25, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

RCRA–2014–0710, by one of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Email: gleaton.gwen@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (404) 562–9964 (prior to 

faxing, please notify the EPA contact 

listed below). 

• Mail: Send written comments to 

Gwendolyn Gleaton, Permits and State 

Programs Section, RCRA Programs and 

Materials Management Branch, RCRA 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Atlanta Federal Center, 61 

Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 

30303–8960. 

• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver 

your comments to Gwendolyn Gleaton, 

Permits and State Programs Section, 

RCRA Programs and Materials 

Management Branch, RCRA Division, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth 

Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303– 

8960. Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Regional Office’s normal 

hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Please see the immediate final rule in 

the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of 

today’s Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gwendolyn Gleaton, Permits and State 

Programs Section, RCRA Programs and 

Materials Management Branch, RCRA 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Atlanta Federal Center, 61 

Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 

30303–8960; telephone number: (404) 

562–8500; fax number: (404) 562–9964; 

email address: gleaton.gwen@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Along 

with this proposed rule, EPA is 

publishing an immediate final rule in 

the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of 

today’s Federal Register pursuant to 

which EPA is authorizing these changes. 

EPA did not issue a proposed rule 

before today because EPA believes this 

action is not controversial and does not 

expect comments that oppose it. EPA 

has explained the reasons for this 

authorization in the direct final rule. 

Unless EPA receives written comments 

that oppose this authorization during 

the comment period, the direct final 

rule in today’s Federal Register will 

become effective on the date it 

establishes, and EPA will not take 

further action on this proposal. If EPA 

receives comments that oppose this 

action, EPA will withdraw the direct 

final rule and it will not take effect. EPA 

will then respond to public comments 

in a later final rule based on this 

proposed rule. You may not have 

another opportunity to comment on 

these State program changes. If you 

want to comment on this action, you 

must do so at this time. For additional 

information, please see the immediate 

final rule published in the ‘‘Rules and 

Regulations’’ section of today’s Federal 

Register. 

Dated: January 13, 2015. 

Heather McTeer Toney, 

Regional Administrator Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01039 Filed 1–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MB Docket No. 14–255; RM–11742; DA 15– 

12] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; Shelter 

Island, New York 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: This document requests 

comments on a Petition for Rule Making 

filed by Red Wolf Broadcasting 

Corporation, proposing to amend the 

FM Table of Allotments, § 73.202(b) of 

the Commission’s rules, by allotting 

Channel 277A at Shelter Island, New 

York, as a first local service. A staff 

engineering analysis indicates that 

Channel 277A can be allotted to Shelter 

Island consistent with the minimum 

distance separation requirements of the 

Commission’s rules with a site 

restriction located 12 kilometers (7.5 

miles) south of the community. The 

reference coordinates are 40–57–54 NL 

and 72–22–59 WL. 

DATES: Comments must be filed on or 

before March 2, 2015, and reply 

comments on or before March 17, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 12th 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. In 

addition to filing comments with the 

FCC, interested parties should serve the 

petitioner as follows: Scott Woodworth, 

Esq., Edinger Associates PLLC, 1875 I 

Street NW., Suite 500, Washington, DC 

20006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2700. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 

14–255, adopted January 8, 2015, and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS