Table B­2A GPRA Annual Performance Plan & Report

Alignment of GPRA and Part Goals, Measures, and Targets 

2005 2006 2007 General Goals 

Performance Indicators 

Measure Target Actual1  Target Target

DEVELOPMENT GOALS

Overall Development Matrix Score 90 O 93.2 95 100

Human capacity 

building

Job Creation: Number of

jobs per $1,000,000

invested

28 O 41

I 50.4

F 28.7

>24 See

Table

B­2B 2 

Job Complexity: Managerial

or Professional jobs as 

Average proportion of total

jobs created per project

50% O 50%

I 36.0

F 62.9

50%

Training: Average per 

project percentage of staff

that will receive formal

training

50% O 74%

I 70.0

F 74.4

50%

Private sector 

development

Local Project Ownership:

Average percentage of

local private ownership of

project

30% O 19%

I 17.0

F 21.2

30%

Host country small and

medium enterprises (SME) 

development: % of Projects 

with over 15% SME local

Ownership

15% O 21%

I 15

F 24

15%

Leveraging of

foreign direct

investment into

the developing

world

Mobilization of the

maximum amount of capital

into a host country per 

dollar of OPIC support

(Increased levels of Small

Business support may 

impact this goal): The ratio

of non­OPIC contribution to

total project cost

>40% O 40% >40%

1  Where available, data are broken down by: (O)verall, (I)nsurance, and (F)inance

2 All Development Measures and targets for FY 2006 are succeeded by the Development Score

beginning in Fiscal Year 2007. See Table B­2B.
2005 2006 2007 General Goals 

Performance Indicators 

Measure Target Actual1  Target Target

SECONDARY GOALS 

Social effects  Promote equal opportunity 

policies, encourage

corporate social

responsibility initiatives, and preserve the

environment

15/30 O 26.7

/ 41

I 26.8

F 26.5

20.5/41

3  See

Table

B­2B 

Development

Infrastructure

Improvements 

Contribute to the

improvement of the

physical, financial, and

social infrastructure of the

developing world

9/15 O 1.8

/ 3

I 1.7

F 2.0

1.8 / 3

Macroeconomic 

and Institutional

Effects 

Matrix Score: Promote

investments in less 

developed countries and

generate host country 

government revenues 

9/15 O 4.4 /

12

I 4.2

F 4.5

7.2 / 12

Technology & 

Knowledge

Transfer 

Matrix Score: Encourage

the transfer of technology 

and know­how to the

developing world

9/15 O 5.1

/15

I 4.0

F 6.2

9 / 15

OPERATIONAL GOALS

Maximum variance of

actual from projected risk 

Mitigate risk  <5% <5% <5% <5%

through sound

portfolio

management

practices, and

by encouraging

good corporate

citizenship.

Number of on­going OPIC

projects monitored for 

compliance with OPIC’s 

U.S. effects, environmental, and worker rights standards 

All active projects will be

self­monitored each year,

and all sensitive projects 

will be site monitored by 

3rd year of operation. Due

diligence will occur before

project approval for 

environmentally sensitive

projects.

Yes  Yes 

259

projects

Yes  Yes 

3 FY 2006 Targets have been redenominated for changes to the methodology.
2005 2006 2007 General Goals 

Performance Indicators 

Measure Target Actual1  Target Target

Number of monitored on­  going projects that meet

OPIC’s U.S. effects, environmental, and worker 

rights standards 

100% 99.2%

i  100% 100%

Additionality  Evaluate new projects to

ensure that they would not

have gone forward but for 

OPIC’s participation. Develop methodology in FY 

2003; Establish baseline in

FY 2004; Improve baseline

score by 10% in FY 2005.

100% 100% 100% 100%

Number of small business 

projects resulting from the

SBC

Complete 60 SBC Finance

Deals and 60 SBC

insurance contracts in FY 

2005. Total: 120 SBC

deals 

Small U.S. 60 81 65 65

Business:

Ensure that

OPIC support is 

provided to

small U.S.

businesses.

Efficiency: Reduce SBC

small business cycle time

75

days ii 

F 68

I 35

70 days  70 days 

Operate in a self

sustaining, businesslike

manner.

Operating revenue is equal

to or greater than operating

expenses 

Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 

Number of executed loan

agreements and insurance

contracts that occur as a

result of Moscow Office

10 13 10 10

i  Monitoring discovered issues with two investments which, as a result, were divested or removed

from OPIC’s portfolio.

ii  This target was revised in the most recent PART.