T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J . M I CH A EL SCH A EFER, P l ai nt i ff

- c ou nt er -def

endant- A p p e lla n t, v. RO BBI N S & K EEH N , A PC, D ef

endant- c ou nt er -c l ai m ant- A pp el l ee , a nd L . S C OT T KE E HN , D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 56448 D. C. No . 3 : 0 6 - c v - 0 0 8 2 1 - J LS - BL M ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J a ni s L . S a m m a rt i no, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r25, 2011 ** 

# FI LED NO V 01 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 56448 2 B efo re: T R O T T , G O U L D , an d R A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. In thi s di vers i ty a ct i on , J. M i chae l S chae fe r app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s s um m a ryj udgm e ntf orR obbi ns & K e e hn, A P C , on hi s f r aud c l a i m , a nd on R obbi ns & K e e hn’ s c ount e r c l a i m f orunpa i d l e ga l f

e e s . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , Mo rr is o n v . H a ll , 261 F . 3d 896, 900 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 1 ) , a n d w e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ygr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e nton S c ha e f e r ’ s f r aud c l a i m be c aus e S c ha e f

e rf a i l e d t o c r e a t e age nui ne di s put e of m a t e r i a l f

a c ta s t o the e le m e n ts o f

f r au d u le n t c o n c e a lm e n t. Se e W i l l i am s on v . G e n. D

y nam i c s C or

p. , 208 F . 3d 1144, 1156 n. 3 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( s e tt i ng f orth r e qui r e m e nt s f

orf r audul e nt conceal m entun der C al i forni a l aw ). T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ygr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e ntt o R obbi ns & K e e hn on i t s a c c ounts t a t e d c l a i m be c aus e R obbi ns & K e e hn s how e d tha tthe r e w a s no genu i ne di sput e of m at er i al fa ctas t o any el em entof thi s c l ai m , and S chae fe r f ai l ed to c r e a te atr iab le d is p u te a s to a n yd e f e n s e to th e c la im . See N i l sso n , R o b b i n s, D al ga rn, B er l i ner, Carson & W urst v. L a. H ydrolec , 8 5 4 F .2 d 1 5 3 8 , 1 5 4 2 - 4 3 ( 9 th C i r. 19 88 ) ( per c uri am ) ( di sc ussi ng ac coun tst at ed cl ai m un der C al i forni a l aw ); A rm enda ri

z v . Fou nd . H

eal th Psy chcare Servs. , Inc. , 6 P . 3d 669, 689 ( C a l . 2000) (a dd re ss i ng pri nci pl es of un consci on abi l i ty) .08- 56448 3 T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g S c h a e f e r ’s e x p a rte ap p lic a tio n to c o n tin u e th e d is c o v e ryd e a d lin e . See Zi v kov i c v . S. Cal. E dis on C o. , 302 F . 3d 1080, 1087- 88 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( s e tt i ng f orth s t a nda r d of

r e vi e w a nd good cause r equi re m ent ). S chae fe r’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. S c h a e f e r ’s “R e q u e s t f

o rC la r if ic a tio n ,” e n te r e d o n O c to b e r1 7 , 2 0 1 1 , is d e n ie d a s m o o t. AF F I RME D.