T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T I n r e : M I CHAEL B OY AJ I AN ; LAYLA B OY AJ I AN , D eb t o rs, L OE F F & V AN DE RP L OE G, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , and M A J O RD U N E , I N C . , A s s i gne e of P l ai nt i ff , M o v an t, v. S H A H R O K H O R D O U B A D I, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t, and MI C HA E L B OY AJ I AN , D e f

e n d an t, N o. 09- 56718 D. C . No . 2 : 9 6 - c v - 0 5 7 3 7 - GH K ME MOR AN DU M * 

# FI LED OC T 15 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

I n r e : M I CHAEL B OY AJ I AN ; LAYLA B OY AJ I AN , D eb t o rs, S H A H R O K H O R D O U B A D I, D efen d an t- A p p el l an t- C ro ssA pp el l ee ,

v. M A Y O RD U N E , I N C . , A s s i gne e of P l ai nt i ff , M o v an t- A p p el l ee - C ro ssA p p e llan t, and L OE F F & V AN DE RP L OE G, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , and MI C HA E L B OY AJ I AN , D e f

e n d an t. N o. 09- 56738 D. C . No . 2 : 9 6 - c v - 0 5 7 3 7 - GH K3

I n r e : S H A K R O K H S H A WN O R D O U B A D I, D ebt or, L OE F F & V AN DE RP L OE G, P l ai nt i ff

, M A Y O RD U N E , IN C . , as si gn ee of re cord of pl ai nt i ff

/ j ud gm entcr edi t or L oeff & V an D e rP l oe g, M o v an t - A p p e llan t., v. S H A K R O K H S H A W N O R D O U B A D I, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 56759 D. C . No . 2 : 9 7 - c v - 0 3 9 1 4 - GH K

L OE F F VA N D E RP L OE G, P l ai nt i ff

,

_____________________ SHAH ROKH ORDO UBAD I ; KA VEH KA RL SHOW RAI ; M I CHAEL B OY AJ I AN , D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees, v. N o. 09- 56760 D. C . No . 2 : 9 7 - c v - 0 3 9 1 3 - GH KB QRT he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w i tho utoralar gu m ent . S ee F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). 4 M A Y O RD U N E , I N C . , Judgm e nt C red i t o rs, M o v an t - A p p e llan t.

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G e or ge H . K i ng, C hi e f

D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r9, 2012 ** P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: T R O T T , K L E IN F E L D , an dM cK E O W N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S h ah r o kh O r d o ub a d i ap p e a ls th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ru lin g s th a t h is M o tio n to V a c a t e R e ne w a l of

Judgm e ntand hi s M ot i on f oran O r de rR e qui r i ng M ay orD une t o F i l e an A c know l e dgm e ntof S a t i s f a c t i on of Judgm e ntw e r e i n s ubs t anc e m ot i ons u n d e rF e d e r a l Ru le o f

C iv il P r o c e du r e 6 0 ( b ) an dh a db e e n u n r e a s o n ab lyd e lay e d . M ay or D un e, Inc. cr oss- appeal s the di stri ctcourt ’ s f i nd i ng thatM ay or D un e had n o t p r o v id e dn o tic e o f

th e r e n e w e dju d g m e n t.

D i s tr i c tc o u rt s h a v e th e au th o r i tyt o tr e a tmo t i o n s s e e k i n g r e l i e f f r o m a j ud gm entas R ul e 60(b) m ot i on s r egar dl es s of the nam e the part i es gi ve them . S ee5

H arv e s t v . C a s tr o , 5 3 1 F .3 d7 3 7 , 7 4 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( tr e a tin g A p p lic a tio n to A m en dO rd er N u n c P ro T u n c as a R u l e 6 0 (b ) m o t i o n ); A m . Iro n w o rk s & E rect o rs, I nc . v. N . A m . C ons tr . C orp. , 248 F . 3d 892, 898- 99 ( 9th C i r . 2001) ( c ons trui ng m o tio n f o rr e c o n s id e r a tio n a s aR u le 6 0 ( b ) m o tio n ) . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r ly c o n s tru e dO r d o ub a d i’s m o tio n s a s m o tio n s u n d e rR u le 6 0 ( b ) . “M o tio n s f

o rr e lie f f r o m ju d g m e n t p u r s u an t to R u le 6 0 ( b ) ar e a d d r e s s e dto the s ound di s c r e t i on of

the di s tr i c tc ourtand w i l l notbe r e ve r s e d abs e ntan abus e of d is c r e tio n .” C a s e yv . A lb e rts o n ’s I n c ., 3 6 2 F .3 d1 2 5 4 , 1 2 5 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . R u le 6 0 ( c ) ( 1 ) s ta te s th a t “[ a ] m o tio n u n d e rR u le 6 0 ( b ) m u s t b e m a d e w ith in ar e a s o n ab le t i m e . ” F e d. R . C i v. P . 60( c ) ( 1) . T he di s tr i c tc ourte xpl a i ne d tha ti tha d a l r e a dy r e j e c t e d apr i orR ul e 60( b) m ot i on f i l e d i n 2006 a s unt i m e l ybe c aus e O r douba di ha d know n aboutthe f

a c t s unde r l y i ng the m ot i on a s e ar l ya s S e pt e m be r2004. T he y e ar s tha te l aps e d be tw e e n O r douba di ’ s f i r s tR ul e 60( b) m ot i on and hi s 2009 m ot i ons ha ve noti m pr ove d hi s c a s e . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on in c o n c lu d in g th a t O r d o ub a d i’s m o tio n s w e r e u n tim e ly . W e a ff i rm the di stri ctcourt ’ s j ud gm ent . B ec ause w e a ff i rm the di stri ct c o u rt, w e d o n o t r e a c h M ay o rD u n e ’s c r o s s ap p e a l.6

AF F I R ME D.