## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________


### m 99-50346

_______________



### D IANA 

### S ALTZMAN 

### , P RESIDENT E MERITUS OF A SSOCIATION OF P ROFESSIONALS IN P OSITIONS OF L EADERSHIP IN E DUCATION , I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON B EHALF OF A LL S IMILARLY A GGRIEVED E MPLOYEES ;



### G RAYDON 

### L OVE 

### , P RESIDENT OF A SSOCIATION OF P ROFESSIONALS IN P OSITIONS OF L EADERSHIP IN E DUCATION , I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON B EHALF OF A LL S IMILARLY A GGRIEVED E MPLOYEES ;



### B ETTY 

### W ILLIAMS 

### , I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON B EHALF OF ALL S IMILARLY S ITUATED A GGRIEVED E MPLOYEES ; 

### M ARY 

### J UDITH 

### L

USTED 

### , I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON B EHALF OF ALL S IMILARLY S ITUATED A GGRIEVED E MPLOYEES ; EVELYN RANUM, I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON B EHALF OF ALL S IMILARLY S ITUATED A GGRIEVED E MPLOYEES ; 

### LAURA 

### S ALAZAR 

### , I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON B EHALF OF ALL S IMILARLY S ITUATED A GGRIEVED E MPLOYEES ; 

### J UDY 

### Z IMMER 

### , I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON B EHALF OF ALL S IMILARLY S ITUATED A GGRIEVED E MPLOYEES ; 

### C ARLOS 

### M ONREAL 

### , I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON B EHALF OF ALL S IMILARLY S ITUATED A GGRIEVED E MPLOYEES ;



### R OSEANNE 

### G ASTON 

### -R ICO 

### , I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON B EHALF OF ALL S IMILARLY S ITUATED A GGRIEVED E MPLOYEES ; 

### M ELISSA 

### R AMOS 

### , I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON B EHALF OF ALL S IMILARLY S ITUATED A GGRIEVED E MPLOYEES ; 

### C YNTHIA 

### G ARDNER 

### , I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON B EHALF OF ALL S IMILARLY S ITUATED A GGRIEVED E MPLOYEES ; 

### S ANDRA 

### S UTTON 

### , I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON B EHALF OF ALL S IMILARLY S ITUATED A GGRIEVED E MPLOYEES ; 

### J URETTA 

### M ARSHALL 

### , I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON B EHALF OF ALL S IMILARLY S ITUATED A GGRIEVED E MPLOYEES ; AND 

### B LANCO 

### G UAJARDO 

### , Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

### T.A. (T ONY 

### ) G UAJARDO 

### , Appellant,

VERSUS


### S AN 

### A NTONIO 

### I NDEPENDENT 

### S CHOOL 

### D ISTRICT 

### ;

T HOMAS 

### C. L OPEZ 

### ,2 P RESIDENT , B OARD OF E DUCATION ; 

### S YLVIA 

### W ARD 

### , V ICE -P RESIDENT , B OARD OF E DUCATION ; 

### J AMES 

### A. H OWARD 

### , S ECRETARY , B OARD OF E DUCATION ; 

### P AUL 

### T ALAMANTEZ 

### , A SSISTANT S ECRETARY , B OARD OF E DUCATION ;



### C ONNIE 

### R OCHA 

### , M EMBER OF THE B OARD OF E DUCATION ; 

### J ULIAN 

### T REVINO 

### , M EMBER OF THE B OARD OF E DUCATION ; 

### M ARY 

### E STHER 

### B ERNAL 

### , M EMBER OF THE B OARD OF E DUCATION ; IN T HEIR O FFICIAL C APACITIES , 

### Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (SA-95-CV-1131)

_________________________ April 6, 2000
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

We have reviewed the briefs, the applicable law, and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel. We find

no reversible error in the findings and conclusions of the district cou r t. The judgment is AFFIRM ED o n the basis of the district court’s opinion.

* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.