alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Materials Not Included in Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA - 2015 - 8470 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM199AD

A300 - 57 - 6005, R05 --- 4/25/13 A300 - 57 - 6005, R04 --- 10/25/99 A300 - 57 - 6005, R03 --- 11/25/97 A300 - 57 - 6005, R02 --- 12/16/93

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Da te: 03/05/2008
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON , D .C . 20460

David Doniger Natural Resources Defense Council 1152 15 1h Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20008 Durwood Zaelke 

## OCT 2 6 2015

Institute for Governance & Sustainable Development 2300 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W. Suite 300B Washington, DC 20007 Dear Mr. Doniger and Mr. Zaelke: O FF ICE O F A I R AN D RA D IAT IO N

This letter is to acknowledge receipt ofthe petition submitted by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and the Institute for Governance & Sustainable Development (IGSD) on October 6, 2015 . The petition requests that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) remove certain high-global warming potential chemicals from the list of acceptable substitutes in various end-uses in the refrigeration and air conditioning, foam blowing , and fire suppression and explosion protection sectors under the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program where more benign alternatives are available. The petition also requests that EPA restrict the sale of small canisters ofHFC-134 to certified technicians only, as well as reference international standards IEC 60335 -2-40 and IS05149 when the Agency approves new alternatives in the enduses covered by those standards . The petition was filed pursuant to section 612(d) ofthe Clean Air Act and 40 CFR 82 . 184(b)(3) . EPA will review this petition. Ifyou have any additional questions, please call me at 202-343- 9729 or send an email to newberg .cindy @ epa.gov. Sincerely,

# c_~ Cindy Newberg , Branch Chief Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch Stratospheric Protection Division

Internet Address ( URL ) • http //www epa gov Recycled /Re cyclable • Pnnted w1th Vegetab le Oil Based Inks on 100% Post consume r P ro cess C h lonne Free Recycl ed Paper
Exhibit
31.1



CERTIFICATION
BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Certification
of Chief Executive Officer

of
Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)



I,
M. Grier Eliasek, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1)
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TP Flexible Income Fund, Inc. (the “Company”);



2)
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;



3)
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;



4)
The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the Company and have:



a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and



c)
disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;
and



5)
The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and



b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.



Date:
May 17, 2019



|/s/
    M. Grier Eliasek          | 
|--------------------------------- | 
|M. Grier Eliasek                  | 
|Chief Executive Officer           | 
|(Principal Executive
    Officer) |
<PAGE>                                                                          
                                                                                
                                 SUBSIDIARIES                                   
                                      OF                                        
                      COMMUNITY MEDICAL TRANSPORT, INC.                         
                                                                                
                                                                     State of   
          Legal Name                            DBA Names          Incorporation
          ----------                            ---------          -------------
                                                                                
Community Ambulette Service, Inc.                                     Delaware  
                                                                                
First Help Ambulance and Ambulette, Inc.   Freedom/A-1 Ambulance      New York  
                                                                                
Empire Ambulance and Ambulette, Inc.       Freedom/A-1 Ambulance      New York  
                                                                                
Century Ambulance and Ambulette, Inc.      Hudson Valley Ambulance    New York  
                                                                                
Elite Ambulance & Medical Coach, Inc.                                 New Jersey
# Core Q1-10, 12-44

# Core Perf Q11 Trend

# Core Q1-10, 12-44 Trend

# Pandemic Phy. Present Q45

# Telework Q46 Trend

# Pandemic Supp. Q47 Trend

# Pandemic Ldrs Q48-53 Trend

# Pandemic Type Work Q54

# Pandemic Response Q55-57

# Demographics
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.9.1
AMENDMENT NO.1 TO
1998 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
     The Trinity Industries, Inc. 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), is hereby amended by this Amendment No. 1, effective as of December 9, 1999.
     Any term which is not defined below shall have the meaning set forth for such term in the Plan.
     1. Section 11 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows:
               Non-transferability of Stock Options. A stock option shall not be transferable otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and a stock option may be exercised, during the lifetime of the Optionee, only by the Optionee; provided, however, a Non-qualified Stock Option may be transferred to one or more members of the immediate family of the Optionee, to a trust for the benefit of one or more members of the immediate family of the Optionee, to a partnership, the sole partners of which are the Optionee and members of the immediate family of the Optionee, or a foundation in which the Optionee controls the management of the assets. Upon any transfer, a stock option will remain subject to all the provisions of this Plan and the option agreement, including the provisions regarding termination of rights with respect to the stock option upon termination of the Optionee’s employment, and the transferee shall have all of the rights of and be subject to all of the obligations and limitations applicable to the Optionee with respect to the stock option, except that the transferee may further transfer the stock option only to a person or entity that the Optionee is permitted to transfer the stock option. Any attempted assignment, transfer, pledge, hypothecation, or other disposition of a stock option contrary to the provisions hereof, or the levy of any execution, attachment, or similar process upon a stock option shall be null and void and without effect.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company as of the day and year first above written.
	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	BY: /s/ Michael G. Furtado
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 906 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the technologies 

through which a vehicle qualifies for the credit for new qualified plugin electric drive motor vehicles. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2013 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. WYDEN, Ms. CANTWELL, and Mr. RISCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

the technologies through which a vehicle qualifies for 

the credit for new qualified plug-in electric drive motor 

vehicles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Changing How Amer5 ica Reduces Greenhouse Emissions (CHARGE) Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 906 IS

1 SEC. 2. CREDIT FOR NEW QUALIFIED PLUG-IN ELECTRIC 

2 DRIVE MOTOR VEHICLES ALLOWED FOR VE3 HICLES WITH ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICAL EN4 ERGY STORAGE DEVICES. 

5 (a) CREDIT ALLOWED FOR NEW TECHNOLOGY.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (F) of section 

7 30D(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

8 amended— 

9 (A) by striking ‘‘battery’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘power source’’, and 

11 (B) in clause (i), by inserting ‘‘(or, in the 

12 case of a power source which is not a battery, 

13 the appropriate energy equivalent to such ca14 pacity, as determined by the Secretary)’’ after 

15 ‘‘4 kilowatt hours’’. 

16 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (d) 

17 of section 30D of such Code is amended by redesig18 nating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5) and by in19 serting after paragraph (3) the following new para20 graph: 

21 ‘‘(4) POWER SOURCE.—The term ‘power source’ 

22 includes a battery or an alternative electrical energy 

23 storage device.’’. 

24 (b) AMOUNT OF CREDIT.— 

25 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 

26 30D(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 906 IS

1 amended by inserting at the end the following new 

2 sentence: ‘‘In the case of any new qualified plug-in 

3 electric drive motor vehicle which uses a power 

4 source other than a battery, this first sentence of 

5 this paragraph shall be applied by substituting the 

6 appropriate energy equivalent measurement for the 

7 number of kilowatt hours.’’. 

8 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading 

9 of paragraph (3) of section 30D(b) of such Code is 

10 amended by striking ‘‘BATTERY CAPACITY’’ and in11 serting ‘‘CAPACITY’’. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

14 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 11

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated August 30, 2004, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of clickNsettle.com, Inc. and
Subsidiaries on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statement of clickNsettle.com, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No.
333-73402, effective November 15, 2001).


/S/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Melville, New York
August 30, 2004
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7808

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DEAN ASHTON BELCHER, a/k/a Deano , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. ( 2:18

- cr - 00191

- RBS

- RJK

- 2 ; 2:20

- cv - 00438

- RBS )

Submitted : May 20, 2021 Decided: May 25, 2021

Before WILKINSON, NIEM E YER, and MOTZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Dean Ashton Belcher, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dean Ashton Belcher seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absen t “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s as sessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatabl e and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Belcher has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 18.1


Tower Automotive, Inc.
5211 Cascade Road S.E., Suite 300
Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546

November 26, 2001

Gentlemen/Ladies:

Re: Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2000

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

During the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company changed its method of
applying Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) 87, "Employers'
Accounting for Pensions" so that the fair value of its pension plans
accumulated benefit obligation and the fair value of the plan assets are
measured as of September 30, within 90 days of year end as permitted under
paragraph 52 of SFAS 87. Previously, such amounts were measured as of December
31 of each year. According to the management of the Company, this change was
made to enable the Company have the actuary's valuation prepared prior to
preparing the year end financial statements which enables the Company to
disclose the valuation based upon the actuarial assessment rather than an
estimate of the fair value.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable alternative
principles has not been established by the accounting profession. Thus, we
cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in accounting
described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have
reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to financial reporting,
in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our opinion stated below is
based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to an
acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the reasons
stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also preferable under the
circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion, we have
relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. PRIMARY AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
REPRESENT EARNINGS PER SHARE OF THE COMPANY'S TCI GROUP STOCK. SEE THE 
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      448
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          11,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         14,926
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              658
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,030
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,244
<SALES>                                            984
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,022
<CGS>                                              605
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,917
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    540
<INCOME-TAX>                                       262
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                278
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.22)
        

</TABLE>
----

**Exhibit      32.01**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1 | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|---|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2 | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods explained in the                report. |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Michael Garin       | /s/                Wallace Macmillan   |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |                                   |
| Michael                Garin           | Wallace                Macmillan       |
|                                   |                                   |
| Chief                Executive Officer | Chief                Financial Officer |
|                                   |                                   |
| March                1, 2007           |                                   |

----
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 903 

To clarify State of residence requirements for aliens and nonimmigrant 

requirements for purposes of chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2013 

Mr. REID (for Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. REED)) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To clarify State of residence requirements for aliens and 

nonimmigrant requirements for purposes of chapter 44 

of title 18, United States Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alien Gun Violence 

5 Prevention Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATE OF RESIDENCE CLARIFICATION. 

7 Chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, is amend8 ed— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 903 IS

1 (1) in section 921, by adding at the end the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(c) For purposes of this chapter, an alien, as defined 

4 in section 101(a)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(3)), who is legally in the United 

6 States shall be considered to be a resident of a State only 

7 if the alien— 

8 ‘‘(1) is residing in the State; and 

9 ‘‘(2) has resided in the State for not less than 

10 90 days before the date of sale or delivery of a fire11 arm.’’; and 

12 (2) in section 922— 

13 (A) in subsection (d)(5)(B), by striking 

14 ‘‘(y)(2)’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘(y), 

15 is in the United States not as an alien lawfully 

16 admitted for permanent residence;’’; 

17 (B) in subsection (g)(5)(B), by striking 

18 ‘‘(y)(2)’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘(y), 

19 is in the United States not as an alien lawfully 

20 admitted for permanent residence;’’; and 

21 (C) in subsection (y)— 

22 (i) in the heading by striking ‘‘ADMIT23 TED UNDER NONIMMIGRANT VISAS’’ and 

24 inserting ‘‘NOT LAWFULLY ADMITTED FOR

25 PERMANENT RESIDENCE’’; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 903 IS

1 (ii) in paragraph (1), by amending 

2 subparagraph (B) to read as follows: 

3 ‘‘(B) the term ‘lawfully admitted for permanent 

4 residence’ has the same meaning as in section 

5 101(a)(20) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

6 (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20)).’’; 

7 (iii) in paragraph (2), by striking 

8 ‘‘under a nonimmigrant visa’’ and insert9 ing ‘‘but not lawfully admitted for perma10 nent residence’’; and 

11 (iv) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking 

12 ‘‘admitted to the United States under a 

13 nonimmigrant visa’’ and inserting ‘‘law14 fully admitted to the United States but not 

15 as an alien lawfully admitted for perma16 nent residence’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS