alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 947 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 947

To ensure access to certain information for financial services industry 
                  regulators, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2013

  Mrs. Hagan (for herself, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Manchin, and Mr. Johanns) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To ensure access to certain information for financial services industry 
                  regulators, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SAFE Act Confidentiality and 
Privilege Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION SHARED BETWEEN STATE AND FEDERAL 
              FINANCIAL SERVICES REGULATORS.

    Section 1512(a) of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 (12 
U.S.C. 5111(a)) is amended by inserting ``or financial services'' 
before ``industry''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.5 


FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE
CATERPILLAR INC.
EXECUTIVE SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


Caterpillar Inc. (the “Company”) established the Caterpillar Inc. Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) to retain and motivate the Chief Executive Officer and Group Presidents of the Company and other officers of the Company who have been designated to participate in the Plan by providing them with the opportunity to earn incentive payments based upon the extent to which specified performance goals have been achieved or exceeded.  The Plan was most recently amended and restated effective June 11, 2014.  Pursuant to Section 6.2 of the Plan, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan.  By this instrument, the Company amends the Plan to rename it the Caterpillar Inc. Executive Annual Incentive Plan.
1.    This First Amendment shall be effective as of December 8, 2015.    
2.    The name of the Plan shall be “Caterpillar Inc. Executive Annual Incentive Plan” and the title on page 1 of the Plan shall be amended accordingly.
3.    Section 1.1 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to provide as follows:
“1.1    Purposes.  The purpose of the Caterpillar Inc. Executive Annual Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as set forth herein (the “Plan”), is to retain and motivate the Chief Executive Officer and Group Presidents of the Company and such other officers of the Company who have been designated by the Committee to participate in the Plan for a specified Performance Period by providing them with the opportunity to earn incentive payments based upon the extent to which specified performance goals have been achieved or exceeded for the Performance Period.  It is intended that amounts payable under this Plan to Participants who are “covered employees” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code will constitute “qualified performance-based compensation” within the meaning of U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, and the Plan and the terms of any Awards hereunder shall be so interpreted and construed to the maximum extent possible.” 


4.    Section 1.2(t) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to provide as follows:







“(t)    “Plan” shall mean the Caterpillar Inc. Executive Annual Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as set forth herein, or as it may be amended from time to time.”


5.    This First Amendment amends only the provisions of the Plan as set forth herein, and those provisions not expressly amended shall be considered in full force and effect.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, this First Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions and the intent of this Second Amendment.
EXHIBIT 32.1 / 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Post Data, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gerald OReilly, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  /s/ Gerald OReilly Name:  Gerald OReilly Title:    Principal Executive and Financial Officer Date:    August 19, 2011
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 13, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41802 Conference Calendar

TROY A. SMOCKS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES MARSHAL, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CV-422

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Troy A. Smocks, a federal prisoner, moves this court for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in his appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for habeas relief, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Smocks argues that he was denied the right to a speedy trial. Smocks has failed to establish a nonfrivolous ground for appeal because he waived his claim that he was denied a speedy trial. See United States v. Bradfield , 113 F.3d 515, 526 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Bell , 966 F.2d 914, 915 (5th Cir.No. 05-41802 -2- 1992); Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The motion to proceed IFP is denied. As the appeal contains no nonfrivolous issues, it is dismissed. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 ( 5th Cir. 1983); 5TH C IR . R. 42.2. Smocks’s motion for appointment of counsel is likewise denied.
MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 910 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 910

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Indian tribes to 
     receive charitable contributions of apparently wholesome food.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2013

  Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Begich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Indian tribes to 
     receive charitable contributions of apparently wholesome food.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS OF APPARENTLY WHOLESOME FOOD TO 
              INDIAN TRIBES.

    (a) In General.--Section 170(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) and (E) as 
        subparagraphs (E) and (F), respectively, and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Special rule for indian tribes.--
                            ``(i) In general.--For purposes of this 
                        paragraph, an Indian tribe (as defined in 
                        section 7871(c)(3)(E)(ii)) shall be treated as 
                        an organization eligible to be a donee under 
                        subparagraph (A) with respect to apparently 
                        wholesome food (as defined in section 22(b)(2) 
                        of the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food 
                        Donation Act (42 U.S.C. 1791(b)(2)) (as in 
                        effect on the date of the enactment of this 
                        subparagraph)) only.
                            ``(ii) Use of property.--For purposes of 
                        subparagraph (A)(i), if the use of the 
                        apparently wholesome food donated is related to 
                        the exercise of an essential governmental 
                        function of the Indian tribal government 
                        (within the meaning of section 7871), such use 
                        shall be treated as related to the purpose or 
                        function constituting the basis for the 
                        organization's exemption.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.45 MB)

Tags:Tree Lighting, Busch, Holiday Social, mwr

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 22 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 22

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an 
              adjournment of the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2013

 Mr. Reid submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an 
              adjournment of the House of Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Thursday, 
August 1, 2013, through Sunday, August 11, 2013, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on Monday, 
August 12, 2013, or such other time on that day as may be specified by 
its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn; 
and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on Monday, August 12, 
2013, it stand adjourned until 12:00 noon on Monday, September 9, 2013, 
or such other time on that day as may be specified by its Majority 
Leader or his designee, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the House adjourns on any legislative day from Friday, August 
2, 2013, through Friday, September 6, 2013, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Monday, September 9, 
2013, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, or their respective designees, acting jointly after consultation 
with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority Leader of the 
House, shall notify the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, 
to reassemble at such place and time as they may designate if, in their 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1:

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Hudson Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin J. Zugibe, as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|/s/ Kevin J. Zugibe        
|---------------------------
|Kevin J. Zugibe            
|Chief Executive Officer and
|Chairman of the Board      
|                           
|March 9, 2005
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

OF MARYLAND Petitioner, V.

SUZANNE NICOLE HULTHAGE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. Docket AG No. 78 September Term 2017 Respondent. ORDER Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, in which the Respondent admits that sufficient evidence exists to sustain allegations that she committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.6, 1.16, 3.1 and 8.4(a) and (d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 21st day of May, 2018, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Suzanne Nicole Hulthage, be and she is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further, ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Suzanne Nicole Hulthage from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland all clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742; and it is further ORDERED, that the Respondent shall not petition for reinstatement unless and until she has been deemed fit to practice law by a medical provider acceptable to Bar Counsel.

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
EXHIBIT  21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES  OF  THE  REGISTRANT



     Telscape  USA,  Inc.
     Texas  Corporation

     Telereunion,  Inc.
     Delaware  Corporation

     TSCP  International,  Inc.
     Texas  Corporation

     MSN  Communications,  Inc.
     California  Corporation

     INTERLINK  Communications,  Inc.
     Delaware  Corporation

     DC  Communications,  Inc.
     Texas  Corporation

     enablecommerce.com,  Inc.
     Delaware  Corporation

     Vextro  de  Mexico,  S.A.  de  C.V.
     Mexico  Corporation

     Telscape  de  Mexico,  S.A. de C.V.
     (formerly Integracion de Redes, S.A. de C.V.)
     Mexico  Corporation

     MS  Noticias,  S.A.  de  C.V.
     Mexico  Corporation

     N.S.I.,  S.A.  de  C.V.
     Mexico  Corporation

     Telereunion,  S.A.  de  C.V.
     Mexico  Corporation

     Telereunion  International,  S.A.  de  C.V.
     Mexico  Corporation

     Servicios  de  Comunicacion  Popluar  S.  de  R.L.
     Mexico  Corporation


<PAGE>
#### PEPSICO, INC., Petitioner, v. Charles H. ALLEN, Respondent.

No. 73455.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Sept. 18, 1990.

ORDER

Petitioner requests rehearing of this court’s Summary Disposition of April 5, 1990, on the above styled case in that Respondent’s claim was facially defective having been filed outside the time allowed and is therefore barred by the statute of limitations. In its Summary Disposition this court stated that *PepsiCo v. Sharp,*781 P.2d 814 (Okl.1989), was dispositive of the issue presented in the present case. However, in *Sharp,*“[t]he statute of limitations was satisfied by Sharp’s timely claim against Lee Way,” and therefore, likewise against PepsiCo. *Sharp,*781 P.2d at 819. In the present case, Allen’s single-event injury was not timely filed and thereby fails to meet the test articulated in *Sharp.*Petitioner’s request for rehearing is therefore granted.

The facts are not disputed. Claimant fell and injured his hand while working *609for Lee Way Motor Freight on May 1, 1984. However, he did not file his claim until February 12, 1986. Petitioner asserted that the claim was barred by the one year statute of limitation which was then in effect. Allen argues that the statute of limitations was tolled by his employer providing him with medical care according to *Moore v. Tom Morris Enterprises,*547 P.2d 966 (Okl.1976). The *Moore*opinion however, stated that voluntary furnishing of medical treatment by an employer will toll the running of the statute only during the time the treatment was furnished. *Id.*at 969. Allen was released from medical treatment on September 25, 1984, which would have extended his time to file a claim to September 25, 1985, yet he did not file until the following February.

Allen further contends that the statute was tolled because his employer did not advise him of his right to file a claim as per 85 O.S. 1981, § 8, [repealed, eff. July 18, 1985, in effect however, at the time of the injury]. The trial court record shows that Allen presented no evidence to meet that burden and the law is well settled that a claimant has the burden to adduce essential facts which would operate to arrest, suspend, toll or waive the statute of limitations, where an employer invoked the statute of limitations. *Armco v. Holcomb,*694 P.2d 937, 939 (Okl.1985).

Both the order of summary disposition hereby challenged by Petitioner and the order by the Workers’ Compensation Court are therefore vacated and the cause is remanded with directions to deny the claim.

The court’s action today should not be construed as having any effect on the remaining cases listed in the Summary Disposition.

HARGRAVE, C.J., OPALA, V.C.J., and HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS and DOOLIN, JJ., concur.

ALMA WILSON and SUMMERS, JJ., dissent.

KAUGER, J., recused,
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer of Reg Technologies
Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Amended Form 20-F of Reg Technologies
Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Reg
Technologies Inc.

Richmond, British Columbia, Canada

by: /s/ James Vandeberg

October 30, 2006

James Vandeberg Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Reg Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Reg
Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350)





In
      connection with the Annual Report of SKMI Interactive, Inc.; on Form 10-KSB
      for
      the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”), Charles Camorata, Principal Executive Officer of the
      Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By: 
                /s/ Charles CamorataName:
                Charles Camorata
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              
              June
                27, 2007