alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.77 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40


### ★ ▲

▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of ScripsAmerica, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey Andrews, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Jeffrey Andrews

Jeffrey Andrews

Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 20, 2014



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1199-17

ANDREW LEE WILLIAMS, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

BRAZORIA COUNTY

KELLER, P.J., filed a concurring opinion.

The Court correctly identifies the issue in this case as whether, in a certificate of analysis

under Article 38.41, “someone other than the analyst who conducted the testing can serve as the 1

affiant.” The Court correctly answers this question “yes.” I do not join the Court’s opinion because

it addresses issues that are not before us, are not briefed by the parties, and are not necessary to the

resolution of the case. 

First, the Court does not need to consider the meaning of “substantial compliance.” Because

 TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 38.41. 1
WILLIAMS CONCURRENCE — 2

the only defect alleged by Appellant is not a defect at all, what “substantial compliance” means has

no bearing on the outcome of this case. The parties address only § 5 of the statute and not § 3. The

Court’s holding that “substantial compliance” requires satisfying all seven requirements set out in

§ 3 is not an issue addressed by the parties.

Second, the Court says that the certificate of analysis in this case is missing at least one item

of information required by § 3. Again, Appellant has never claimed that the State failed to comply

with § 3.

Third, even if Appellant had complained in this Court about § 3, the Court concludes that

Appellant forfeited that claim because he failed to raise it at trial. If he has forfeited a § 3 claim, we

do not need to address the merits of a § 3 claim.

And finally, it is not clear to me that the Court’s holding on the meaning of “substantial

compliance” is correct. I cannot think of an instance when, under the Court’s holding, “substantial”

compliance would not also be full compliance. And, of course, we have no guidance from the parties

on what “substantial compliance” means with respect to § 3.

I agree with the Court’s holding that Article 38.41 does not require the affiant to be the

analyst. I would not go further than that holding to comment on matters that are not before us. Such

statements are dicta. I concur in the Court’s judgment. 2

Filed: October 9, 2019

Publish

 See State v. Ross, 573 S.W.3d 817, 827 & n.59 (Tex. Crim. App. 2019). 2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.32 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, People & CUlture, Native American Heritage Month 

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 13, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41802

Conference Calendar

TROY A. SMOCKS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES MARSHAL,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CV-422

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Troy A. Smocks, a federal prisoner, moves this court for

authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in his appeal

from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for habeas

relief, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Smocks argues that he was

denied the right to a speedy trial.

Smocks has failed to establish a nonfrivolous ground for

appeal because he waived his claim that he was denied a speedy

trial. See United States v. Bradfield, 113 F.3d 515, 526 (5th

Cir. 1997); United States v. Bell, 966 F.2d 914, 915 (5th Cir.
No. 05-41802

-2-

1992); Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982);

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The motion to proceed IFP is denied. 

As the appeal contains no nonfrivolous issues, it is dismissed. 

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. Smocks’s motion for appointment of counsel is likewise

denied.

MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
DJI Phantom 3 User Manual

The DJI Phantom 3 User manual is over the maximum 10MB file size to upload to regulations.gov. This 

manual is available upon request to kirk@agpixel.com or you can view in your web browser at 

http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.55 MB)

Tags:McEntire Joint National Guard Base, Defense Support of Civil Authorities, SCEMD, SC-HART, SCARNG, SC National Guard, Nikki Haley, S.C. Army national Guard, DOMOPS, hurricane response, SC Emergency Management Division, SC Flood, scng, Governor of South Carolina, SC-Gov, damage assessment, 108 PAD, 169 FW, South CArolina Army National Guard, Hurricane matthew, First responder , domestic operations , Flooding , Soldier, DLA Troop Support, airman, national guard, DSCA

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.32 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, dla, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1





                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Tele-Communications, Inc.:



   
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-56271, 33-57177, 33-57399, 33-63139, 33-64127, 33-65311, 33-65493,
333-00265, 333-00835, 333-06723, 333-07615, 333-27039, 333-29849, 333-40131,
333-41435, 333-44745 and 333-56635 on Form S-3, the Registration Statement (No.
333-64297) on Form S-4, and the Registration Statements (Nos. 33-44543,
33-54263, 33-60839, 33-60843, 33-64827, 33-64829, 33-64831, 33-65485, 33-65487,
333-06177, 333-06179, 333-16025, 333-16027, 333-40141, 333-42917 and 333-58083)
on Form S-8 of Tele-Communications, Inc. of our reports dated March 20, 1998,
except for note 19 which is as of January 6, 1999, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Tele-Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1997, and all related schedules, which reports appear
in the December 31, 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by Form 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 2), of Tele-Communications, Inc.
    



                                            KPMG LLP



Denver, Colorado
January 7,1999
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 24 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns 

3 on any day from Wednesday, October 16, 2013, through 

4 Friday, October 25, 2013, on a motion offered pursuant 

5 to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 

6 designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon 

7 on Monday, October 28, 2013, or such other time on that 

8 day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his des9 ignee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time 

10 of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 

11 resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the 

12 House adjourns on any legislative day from Wednesday, 

13 October 16, 2013, through Monday, October 21, 2013, on 

14 a motion offered pursuant to this current resolution by 

15 its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned 

16 until 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 22, 2013, or until 

17 the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 

18 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first. 
2 

†SCON 24 ES 

1 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the 

2 Speaker of the House, or their respective designees, acting 

3 jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the 

4 Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify 

5 the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to re6 assemble at such place and time as they may designate 

7 if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it. 

Passed the Senate October 16, 2013. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 24 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess 

of Representatives. of the Senate and an adjournment of the House
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 15-663C

(Filed August 3, 2015)

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*

*

OXFORD DEVELOPMENT CO., *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

v. *

*

THE UNITED STATES, *

*

Defendant, *

*

and, *

*

CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE *

SOLUTIONS PA LP, *

*

Defendant-Intervenor. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER

The government has moved to amend paragraph seven of the protective order 

to add personnel of the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) to the list of 

persons automatically entitled to access protected information. Plaintiff does not 

oppose this motion. Chambers has contacted counsel for defendant-intervenor

Cambridge Healthcare Solutions PA LP, who indicated that it opposed the motion 

but would not file any written opposition. 

The Court is normally reluctant to expand access to protected material 

beyond personnel of the procuring agency or the Department of Justice, or to allow 

use of this material for purposes other than the protest being litigated. See, e.g.,

CBY Design Builders v. United States, No. 11-740, 2011 WL 5402686, *1 (Fed. Cl. Nov. 

8, 2011). Such concerns are not raised by the motion under consideration. In this 
- 2 -

matter, the Department of Veterans Affairs has acted pursuant to a delegation of 

authority from the GSA, and the government maintains that the application of 

GSA’s acquisition regulations may be at issue. This is a legitimate basis for

including GSA personnel within the automatic access provision for purposes of this 

litigation. Good cause having been shown, the government’s motion is GRANTED, 

and the amended protective order will be issued separately. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Victor J. Wolski

VICTOR J. WOLSKI

Judge
MEMORANDUM

June 23, 2011

TO: Air Docket

FROM: Nancy Ketcham-Colwill

SUBJECT: Meeting Summary

On December 10, 2010, EPA representatives met with representatives of the oil and ethanol industries 

and gasoline marketers at the request of several of those representatives to explore the possibility of 

conducting an E15 workshop to address various issues in potentially bringing E15 to market. EPA 

representatives sought feedback on whether and when it would be useful to conduct such a workshop 

and the importance of active and good faith participation by stakeholders for such a workshop to be 

successful. Representatives of the different industries described their varying perspectives on 

introducing E15 into commerce However, there was general agreement that, to the extent E15 enters 

the market, a number of important infrastructure, liability and consumer education issues must be 

addressed to avoid misfueling and other potential problems, and that a workshop or work group might 

be useful for addressing those issues at some point. 

Attendees:

Margo Oge, EPA

Karl Simon, EPA

Paul Argyropoulous, EPA

Nancy Ketcham-Colwill, EPA

Bob Greco, API

Greg Scott, NPRA

John Eichberger, NACS

Bob Dinneen, RFA

Tom Buis, Growth Energy

Mark Morgan, PMAA

Timothy Columbus, SIGMA

Brandon Wright, PMAA
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-3065

WILLIAM C. ELLIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge.

(CA-95-3514-K)

Submitted: June 28, 1996 Decided: July 26, 1996

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William C. Ellis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

emergency motion for stay. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ellis v. Anne

Arundel County, No. CA-95-3514-K (D. Md. Nov. 22, 1995). Additionally, we deny Appellant's motion for emergency stay filed in this

court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED