alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Amendment No. 1
on quarterly Report of BioPharma Manufacturing Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
September 30, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Gary Riccio, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of
the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | By:    | /s/ Gary Riccio                                            
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:  | Gary Riccio                                                
| | Title: | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
| | Date:  | April 9, 2014                                              



This certification has been furnished solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|            
|------------
|Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer
of Allied Irish Banks, p.l.c., a public limited liability company incorporated and registered in Ireland (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2013 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                               
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|Dated: 25 April 2014 |  |  |  | DAVID DUFFY                   
|                     |  |  |  | Name: David Duffy             
|                     |  |  |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION** 

**WASHINGTON, DC In the Matter of: SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC.** 

FDMS No. FAA
- 2012
- 0777 Served: August 17, 2015
**EXTENSION OF TIME** Complainant served its appeal brief on Respondent on July 16, 2015 by

mail

. Consequently , under 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.233(e) and 13.211(e), Respondent’s reply brief is due on August 25, 2015
. By request dated August 12, 2015 , Respondent’s counsel has reques ted a 30

- day extension of time in which to file its r eply brief. Respondent’s counsel represents that the agency attorney has agreed to this request for an additional 30 day s . Respondent’s request for an extension of time in which to file its reply brief is granted under 14 C.F.R. § 13.233(e )(1). Respon dent’s repl y brief is now due to be filed on or before September 24, 2015

. MI CHAEL P. HUERTA ADMINISTRATOR Federal Aviation Administration [Original signed b y J erome M. Mellody ] JEROME M. MELLODY 1 Acting Assistant Chief Counsel for Litigation and General Law

1 Issued un der authority delegated to the Chief Counsel and the Assistant Chief Counsel for Litigation by Memorandum dated October 27, 1992, under 49 U.S.C. § 322(b) and 14 C.F.R. § 13.202 ( see 57 Fed. Reg. 58,280 (1992))

.**Service List SkyWest Airlines, Inc.**  FDMS No. FAA
- 201 2
- 0777
To be sent b y Regular U.S. Mail No. of copies Casey E. Gardner, Attorney 1 Federal Aviation Administration Enforcement Division, AGC

- 300 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Todd Emerson, Esq. original Sky West Airlines, Inc. 444 South River Road St. Georgia, UT 84790 Additional copies For the file 2 Copy for Sharice to enter in the MTI S 1
Sharice will send a copy

to the FDMS through MTI S.
#### BLUE SPRINGS STATE BANK OF BLUE SPRINGS, MISSOURI, by R. Waldo HOLT, Commissioner of Finance, etc., Appellant, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY.

No. 11554.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Feb. 26, 1940.

Jerome Walsh, of Kansas City, Mo., Burns Strader, of Independence, Mo., and Roy W. Rucker, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

Paul G. Koontz, Harry F. Murphy, and Elliott Norquist, all of Kansas City, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed at cost of appellant, on motion of appellant.
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 21
                                                        Schedule of Subsidiaries


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    State 
              Name                              Incorporation    % of Ownership
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community Ambulette Service, Inc.                  Delaware             100%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Help Ambulance and Ambulette, Inc.           New York             100%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Empire Ambulance and Ambulette, Inc.               New York             100%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Century Ambulance and Ambulette, Inc.              New York             100%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richards/Decker Operating Company, Inc.            New York             100%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elite Ambulance and Medical Coach, Inc.           New Jersey            100%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hudson Valley Meddtex, Inc.                        New York             100%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clove Professional Services, Inc.                  New York             100%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consolidated Collections, Inc.                     New York             100%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richards/Decker Payroll Company, Inc.              New York             100%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.72 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.67 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, dla, fms, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Smith, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Covington, J.), rendered December 12, 1988, convicting defendant after a jury trial of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of seven and one-half to fifteen years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant and his accomplice were convicted of robbing a livery driver at gunpoint. Defendant testified that he was innocent, that he had somehow wrested the gun from complainant after a fare dispute, and that he was planning to surrender the gun to the police when he was arrested. During cross-examination, the prosecutor asked defendant whether he had ever told the police that it was he who had been the victim of a crime, to which defendant responded that he told them that they had arrested the wrong person.

Generally, it is improper to use defendant’s pre-trial silence as direct evidence of guilt, or to impeach the credibility of a testifying defendant *(People v De George,*73 NY2d 614). Here, however, the conspicuous absence of defendant’s exculpatory statements from those admissions defendant did make was sufficiently significant to warrant the inference that the statement was more consistent with guilt than innocence, and was admissible to impeach defendant’s credibility *(People v Savage,*50 NY2d 673; *see, People v Rothschild,*35 NY2d 355, 358-359). On this score, the comment by the prosecutor on summation was properly limited to reference to defendant’s credibility.

Defendant’s remaining claims have no merit. Defendant did not lay a proper foundation for the admission of a detective’s report of the incident *(People v Maisonave,*140 AD2d 545, *lv*
      *278
      *denied*72 NY2d 958). There is ample support in the record for the court’s decision to accept a partial verdict (CPL 310.70), and the court did not abuse its power to control the scope of cross-examination. *(People v Schwartzman,*24 NY2d 241, *cert denied*396 US 846.) Defendant’s present objection to the court’s charge on the complainant’s credibility has not been preserved, and his arguments on the impact of the court’s decision to raise his bail during the trial are speculative. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Asch and Smith, JJ.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 24
- 00415
- CV

In re T.F.

FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. 23
- 1148 , THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Relator, T.F., filed a writ of mandamus requesting that we order the trial court to hold a de novo hearing concerning an order by an associate judge. Re la tor also filed a motion in the trial court request ing a hearing be set for August 7, 20 2 4 , which setting was granted . We abated this original proceeding on July 17, 2024, pending the hearing date . We also ordered relator to file a status letter with this Court by August 14, 2024, informing us about the status of the hearing

. Since that date has now passed, we reinstate this original proceeding. Although we have not received an update from relator, we have been informed by the trial court clerk that relator’s requested de novo hearing was held by the trial court on August 7th. Because relator’s requested relief has been granted , we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See
In re Luna , 317 S.W.3d 484, 484 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2010, orig. proceeding) ; see also In re Gonzales , No. 03

- 12

- 00611

- CV, 2013 WL 238736, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Jan. 17, 2013, orig. proceeding )

.2 __________________________________________ Darlene Byrne , Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly Dismissed Filed: August 27, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 35 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.35
                                        Agreed to April 10, 2014        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Thursday, 
April 10, 2014, through Thursday, April 24, 2014, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on Monday, 
April 28, 2014, or such other time on that day as may be specified by 
its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, 
or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House 
adjourns on any legislative day from Thursday, April 10, 2014, through 
Thursday, April 24, 2014, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Monday, April 28, 2014, or until the time 
of any reassembly pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  (a) The Majority Leader of the Senate or his designee, 
after consultation with the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify 
the Members of the Senate to reassemble at such place and time he may 
designate if, in his opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
     (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the Senate 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the Senate shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.
    Sec. 3.  (a) The Speaker of his designee, after consultation with 
the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify Members of the House to 
reassemble at such place and time he may designate if, in his opinion, 
the public interest shall warrant it.
     (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the House 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the House shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
Order filed March 15 , 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 11

- 00 856

- CV

____________ SHARON ANN GRIBBLE, Individually and in her Capacity as Guardian of the

Person and Estate of Michael Ray Gribble , Appellant

V.

BRENT ALLEN LAYTON , Appellee

On Appeal from the 306 th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09FD0426



### O R D E R
No record has been filed in this appeal. According to information provided to this
court, t his is an appeal from a judgment signed June 30 , 2011

. Appellant filed a timely
motion for new trial. Appellant filed h er notice of appeal on September 29 , 2011

. Appellant also filed a n affidavit of indigence

. Any contest was required to have been filed within 10 days of the affidavit’s filing. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(e). No contest was
filed. Accordingly, the affidavit’s allegations are deemed true, and appellant is allowed to proceed without advance payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(f ).2

Accordingly, we issue the following o rder:

It is ORDERED that appellant is deemed to be indigent for appeal and is allowed to proceed without the advance payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(f ). The
Galveston County District Clerk is ordered to file a clerk ’ s record in this appeal on or
before April 16 , 201 2

. The official court reporter, Ronald E. Vella , is ordered to file the reporter ' s record in this appeal on or before April 16 , 2012 , subject to a reasonable request for an extension of time, if necessary to complete preparation of the record.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Jamison and McCally.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Edward Duffy, Respondent. North American Van Lines, Inc., Appellant; Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 28, 1989, which, *inter alia,*assessed North American Van Lines, Inc. for additional unemployment insurance contributions.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision that North American Van Lines, Inc. (hereinafter NAVL) had substantial control over claimant, thus indicating that an employer/employee relationship existed. For example, although claimant was permitted to work for other carriers, this was subject to NAVL’s authorization, thereby limiting claimant’s ability to generate business of his own, and NAVL was the source of claimant’s access to work and customers *(see, Matter of Webley [Graphic Transmissions—Roberts],*133 AD2d 885). In addition, NAVL’s name was printed on the tractor and trailer and NAVL owned the trailer that claimant hauled *(see, Matter of*
      *915
      *Davis [RTC Transp.—Roberts],*111 AD2d 1030, 1031). Finally, claimant was not allowed to refuse any loads that NAVL asked him to haul and he was required to call in by a certain time every day to report the progress of his trip. While other factors may support NAVL’s contention that claimant was an independent contractor, affirmance is required since the determination that claimant was an employee of NAVL is supported by substantial evidence *(see, Matter of Blount [Whalen’s Moving & Stor. Co.—Hartnett],*154 AD2d 849, 849-850, *lv denied*76 NY2d 702).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Levine, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur.