alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

I Communications

Commission

----

Taux de change de l'euro (1)

10 février 2005

(2005/C 36/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: taux de change de référence publié par la Banque centrale européenne.

----

----

Notification préalable d'une opération de concentration

(Affaire COMP/M.3734 — Ericsson/H3G)

(2005/C 36/02)

(Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE)

----

(1)JO L 24 du 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----

----

AVIS DE LA COMMISSION

du 22 décembre 2004

concernant le projet de rejet d'effluents radioactifs résultant du déclassement des cheminées des réacteurs de Windscale à Sellafield, dans la région de Cumbria, au Royaume-Uni, conformément à l'article 37 du traité Euratom

(2005/C 36/03)

(Le texte en langue anglaise est le seul faisant foi.)

Le 16 avril 2004, la Commission européenne a reçu du gouvernement du Royaume-Uni, conformément à l'article 37 du traité Euratom, les données générales relatives au projet de rejet d'effluents radioactifs résultant du déclassement des cheminées des réacteurs de Windscale.

Sur la base de ces données et des informations additionnelles demandées par la Commission le 9 juillet 2004 et communiquées par le gouvernement du Royaume-Uni le 3 septembre 2004, et après consultation du groupe d'experts, la Commission a formulé l'avis suivant:

En conclusion, la Commission est d'avis que la mise en oeuvre du projet de rejet d'effluents radioactifs, quelle que soit leur forme, issus du déclassement des cheminées des réacteurs de Windscale à Sellafield, au Royaume-Uni, tant dans les conditions normales qu'en cas d'accident du type et de l'ampleur envisagés dans les données générales, n'est pas susceptible d'entraîner une contamination radioactive, significative du point de vue sanitaire, de l'eau, du sol ou de l'espace aérien d'un autre État membre.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 736 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 736

To establish a maximum amount for special use permit fees applicable to 
 certain cabins on National Forest System land in the State of Alaska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 16, 2013

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish a maximum amount for special use permit fees applicable to 
 certain cabins on National Forest System land in the State of Alaska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alaska Subsistence Structure 
Protection Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Covered cabin.--The term ``covered cabin'' means a 
        cabin (including related structures) on National Forest System 
        land in the State of Alaska--
                    (A) that is used for subsistence uses;
                    (B) that is subject to section 1303(d) of the 
                Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 
                U.S.C. 3193(d));
                    (C) that is subject to section 1316(a) of the 
                Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 
                U.S.C. 3204(a)); or
                    (D) that is used for commercial fishing by a 
                permittee that does not generate more than $15,000 in 
                gross annual income from the fishery.
            (2) Subsistence uses.--The term ``subsistence uses'' has 
        the meaning given the term in section 803 of the Alaska 
        National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 3113).

SEC. 3. ALASKA SUBSISTENCE USE CABIN PERMIT FEES.

    The maximum amount of the fee for the issuance of a special use 
permit by the Secretary of Agriculture for the use and occupancy of 
National Forest System land for a covered cabin shall be not more than 
$250.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 16, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-4110.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, October 16, 2018, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Antoinette Ross. For more information please contact: Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-4110, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Room 1509, National Office, Washington, DC 20224, or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The committee will be discussing various issues related to Taxpayer Communications and public input is welcome.

Dated: September 1, 2018.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2018-19631 Filed 9-10-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-15158

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cv-00620-ODE

BOBBY SHINE, SHEILA SHINE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 

successor by merger with BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, 

f.k.a. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, 

MORTGAGE ELECTRIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., et al.

 Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(May 1, 2015)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Case: 14-15158 Date Filed: 05/01/2015 Page: 1 of 3 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Bobby and Sheila Shine appeal the denial of their motion to reconsider the 

denial of their motion to voluntarily dismiss their complaint without prejudice and 

an award of costs to Bank of America, N.A., and Mortgage Electric Registration 

Systems, Inc. (collectively “Bank of America”). We affirm.

We have jurisdiction to entertain the Shines’ appeal. Bank of America 

argues that the Shines’ notice of appeal misnames the order they seek to have 

reviewed and fails to evince the intent to appeal the denial of their motion for 

reconsideration, but we rejected those arguments earlier and ordered this appeal to

proceed. Bank of America also argues that the Shines filed their notice pro se in 

violation of a local district court rule that prohibits a represented party from 

proceeding on his own behalf, see N.D. Ga. R. 83.1(D)(2), but noncompliance with 

a local procedural rule does not affect the validity of a timely notice of appeal, see

Fed. R. App. P. 3(a)(2) (“An appellant’s failure to take any step other than the 

timely filing of a notice of appeal does not affect the validity of the appeal.”).

The Shines argue that they were entitled to reconsideration of their motion to 

dismiss their complaint voluntarily without prejudice and that the district court 

erred in its award of costs to the Bank, but these two arguments fail. First, the 

district court committed no reversible error in dismissing the Shines’ complaint 

with prejudice. The Shines, represented by counsel, failed even to respond to the 

Case: 14-15158 Date Filed: 05/01/2015 Page: 2 of 3 
3

motion to dismiss filed by Bank of America, and the Shines never moved to amend 

their complaint. The Shines also did not argue, as they do now, that Bank of 

America would suffer no prejudice by the dismissal of their complaint without 

prejudice, and we will not consider that argument for the first time on appeal. See

Access Now, Inc. v. Sw. Airlines Co., 385 F.3d 1324, 1331 (11th Cir. 2004).

Second, the Shines are mistaken about the nature of the award of costs. The Shines 

describe the award as an award of attorney’s fees, but the district court instead

awarded the Bank its costs, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1).

We AFFIRM the dismissal of the Shines’ complaint. 

Case: 14-15158 Date Filed: 05/01/2015 Page: 3 of 3
Proposed Rule: Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule: 2015Revisions and Confidentiality Determinations for Petroleumand Natural Gas SystemsMeeting DocumentationDate Staff Contact Information(Name, email, phone #)Name of Organization(Attach list of allattendees names andemails if possible)Summary of Discussion(e.g., applicability,reporting requirements,etc.)WrittenCommentsProvided?Did they alsosubmit toDocket?Date sent toEPA- CCD6/24/15Alexis McKittrick,mckittrick.alexis@epa.gov,202-343-9153Other EPA attendees:Anhar KarimjeeMark de FigueiredoLisa Grogan-McCullochKarin Ritter, API,Ritterk@api.orgMark Bareta, WilliamsReid Smith, BPGrover Campbell, DevonBrad Morello, ShellKimberly Coy, ShellShankar Ananthakrishna,ChevronKindal Keen, AECOM-Completions andworkovers of oil wellswith hydraulicfracturing-Gathering and boosting-Best availablemonitoring methodsNoneprovided;submittedcomments tothe docket onthe ruleN/A
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Vadim Mats, Chief Financial Officer of Point Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: May 2, 2014


By:
/s/ Vadim MatsVadim Mats

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EPA # 4137EPA # 4137
Exhibit 32.1

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549



|RE: | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.



/s/ Michael J. UlrichMichael J. Ulrich Vice
President The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I


May 10, 2013
629 EntlerA venue , Suite 15 Chico, C A 95928 (530) 332-9400 (530) 332-9417Fax

April 23, 2012

To : Alex Krichevsky, (916) 324-6222 e-mail: akrichev@arb.ca
.gov From: Armen Kamian , Air Quality Planner Butte County Air Quality Management District Telephone : (530) 332-9400 e-mail : akamian@bcaqmd.org W. James Wagoner AirPollution Control Officer Robert McLaughlin Asst . Air Pollution Control Officer

Attached please find submittal to the Butte County Air Quality Management District's State Implementation Plan (SIP) for PM2
.5 for the following : Rule 300, Open Burning, Prohibitions and Exemptions (amended December 2010 and February 2011) Please note that the December 2010 amendment contained major changes to the rule, with the subsequent amendment in February 2011 having minor changes. Both strikeout versions have been included, as well as the Resolutions and Public Notices for each amendment. Public comment summaries are attached in Minutes form, and another separate word document summary page . If you have any questions, please contact me at (530) 332-9400, ext 108. Sincerely,

# o_,u~~~~ Armen Kamian Associate Air Quality Planner
1

BECKHAM, LISA

From: BECKHAM, LISA

Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 11:18 AM

To: R9AirPermits

Subject: U.S. EPA Notice: Additional Public Hearing for Four Corners Power Plant Proposed 

Permit

http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/permit/r9-permits-issued.html#fcpp

* * * Public Notice * * * 

Four Corners Power Plant 

Announcement of Additional Public Hearing on the Proposed Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration Permit and Minor NSR Permit in Indian Country 

PSD Permit No. NN 14-01 

Tribal Minor NSR Permit: T-002-NN 

In late July 2014, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (EPA) provided notice of, and requested 

public comment on, EPA’s proposed action relating to the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit 

application (Application) for the addition of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems at Four Corners Power Plant 

(FCPP) near Fruitland, New Mexico. In our previous notice, EPA also announced two Public Hearings and two Public 

Information Meetings to be held at the Nenahnezad Chapter House in Fruitland, NM on August 27 and San Juan College 

in Farmington, NM on August 28. 

EPA is announcing an additional Public Hearing and Public Information Meeting, as follows: 

Date: August 28, 2014 

Time: Public Information Meeting, 11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. 

 Public Hearing, 12:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. 

Location: Phil L. Thomas Performing Arts Center 

State Route 504 (West Hwy 64) 

0.9 miles West of US-491 South 

Shiprock, NM 87420 

English-Diné translation services will be provided at each Public Information Meeting and Public Hearing. If you require a 

reasonable accommodation, please contact Philip Kum, EPA Region 9 Reasonable Accommodations Coordinator, by 

August 20, 2014 at (415) 947-3566, or kum.philip@epa.gov. 

Additional information regarding our proposed permit decision, including our previous public notice with additional 

details about the public comment period, is available on EPA Region 9’s website at: 

http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/permit/r9-permits-issued.html#fcpp. All written comments on the proposed action 

must be received or postmarked by September 24, 2014. 
2

If you would like to be added to our mailing list to receive future information about this proposed permit decision or 

other permit decisions issued by EPA Region 9, please contact Lisa Beckham at (415) 972-3811 or send an email to 

R9AirPermits@epa.gov, or visit EPA Region 9's website at http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/permit/psd-publicguidelines.html. Lisa Beckham can also be reached through EPA Region 9’s toll-free general information line at (866) 

372-9378. 

***Please bring the foregoing notice to the attention of all persons who would be interested in this matter.***
#### In the Matter of Delaware County Department of Social Services, on Behalf of Laura Mills, Appellant, v John Evanitsky, Respondent.

Mikoll, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Delaware County (Estes, J.), entered November 30, 1989, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, denied petitioner’s objections to the amount of child support respondent was required to pay petitioner.

Respondent was determined to be the father of a child born out of wedlock. Petitioner sought to determine respondent’s liability to reimburse it for costs of placement of the child in a mental health facility from August 27, 1987 through August 26, 1988 in the amount of $50,475.99. After hearings, a Hearing Examiner found that respondent had a gross income less Social Security taxes of $43,165.92 for 1987 and, under the Child Support Standards Act (L 1989, ch 567), was liable to contribute $4,280.62 for such care in 1987. The Hearing Examiner also held that respondent had a gross income less Social Security taxes of $17,905.68 for 1988 and was liable to contribute for that year’s care $1,876.91, for a total of $6,157.53, to be paid at the rate of $100 per month. Petitioner’s objections to this determination were denied and this appeal ensued.

Petitioner now contends that a reversal is required in that (1) the Hearing Examiner’s findings as to respondent’s income for the years 1987 and 1988 are without basis in the record, and (2) respondent’s failure to provide accurate records tended to obscure his financial status, warranting an award based only on the needs of the child rather than on respondent’s ability to pay. We disagree. The record, while leaving some*909thing to be desired, contains sufficient evidence to support the findings of the Hearing Examiner. Therefore, Family Court’s order denying both the written objections to the Hearing Examiner’s determination and petitioner’s demand that respondent be required to pay one half of the costs of health facility treatment for the child should be affirmed.

Petitioner’s claim that the record is so confusing, inconsistent and conflicting that it is impossible to ascertain respondent’s true income is much diminished by the fact that petitioner was given the opportunity by the Hearing Examiner to reopen the hearing and to further examine respondent after receipt of his corporate tax return, but did not do so. Moreover, it does not appear that petitioner utilized the rules of discovery available to develop a more complete record. Finally, we cannot conclude, on the basis of the evidence presented, that the Hearing Examiner abused his discretion in failing to attribute or impute certain income from resources available to respondent *(see,*Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [b] [5] [iv]).

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Crew III, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60642 Conference Calendar

LEWIS GREENWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus EDWARD M. HARGETT; GREGORY STEWART; JESSIE TRIBUNE, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:95-CV-401-D-B

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Lewis Greenwood, Mississippi prisoner # 64597, appeals the judgment of the district court, arguing that the dismissal with prejudice of his civil rights action alleging a violation of his First Amendment right of access to the courts was error. We have reviewed the record and Greenwood’s brief and agree with theNo. 96-60642 - 2 - district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted on the alternative basis of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)B)(ii). Greenwood has not alleged the requisite actual injury to support a First Amendment violation. See Lewis v. Casey , 116 S. Ct. 2174, 2180 (1996). Greenwood’s appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9041-3]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa/​.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements

Filed 09/03/2018 Through 09/07/2018

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search*.                

EIS No. 20180209, Final, GSA, MD, 2018 Master Plan for the Consolidation of the U.S. FDA HQ Final Environmental Impact Statement, Review Period Ends: 10/15/2018, Contact: Paul Gyamfi 202-440-3405

EIS No. 20180210, Final, USN, VA, Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing, Review Period Ends: 10/15/2018, Contact: Todd Kraft 757-836-2943

EIS No. 20180211, Adoption, NIGC, CA, Final Environmental Impact Statement—Wilton Rancheria, Review Period Ends: 10/15/2018, Contact: Austin Badger 202-632-7003

Dated: September 10, 2018.

Robert Tomiak,

Director, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2018-19923 Filed 9-13-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P