alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, October 10, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Rosalia at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 834-2203.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be held Wednesday, October 10, 2018, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Robert Rosalia. For more information please contact Robert Rosalia at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 834-2203, or write TAP Office, 2 Metrotech Center, 100 Myrtle Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11201 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

Dated: September 1, 2018.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 2018-19635 Filed 9-10-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
05/03/201 0 15:5 0 FA X 202483514 2 FA A • * DM S 0001/00 1 

## Law Offic e o f Edwar d A . Lope z Attorne yA t Law • ' • . e a

Apri l 6* , 201 0 Hearin g Docke i Artn : Hearin g Docket

Clerk , A'GC-43 0 " Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenu e S.W . Wilbu r Wright Building , Suit e 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Re : Th e Matte r

o f Roslyn e Mari e £ldc r Case #2009SW29013 5 Dea r Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , 

# (Lp/05u/DD2>f/5^^^"^^^ ^ I represen t

Ms . Elde r

i n th e above-reference dcase . Pleas e take thi s lette r a s he r officia l reques t fo r ahearin g in th e abov e matter . Thank you fo r your tim e an dattentio n t o thi s matter .

CC ; Ro-slyn

e Elde r Lynette Word , Esq. , U.S . Dept . o f Transportation , Regional Counse l

Ventur e Corporat e Cente r 344 0 Hollywoo d Blvd . Suit e 41 5 Te l 954«24 1 •420 5 Hollywood , F L 3302 1 Fax954*24 1 •420 6
Cover Letter TS

- R1947B

Note: All text in this cover letter constitutes Confidential Business Information

[Material redacted]
EX-10.37



 Exhibit 10.37 

*** INDICATES MATERIAL THAT WAS OMITTED AND FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT WAS REQUESTED. ALL SUCH OMITTED MATERIAL WAS FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO

 CLINICAL TRIAL AGREEMENT E2112 

BETWEEN 
 ECOG-ACRIN CANCER RESEARCH
GROUP 
 AND SYNDAX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 
 This
Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment” or “Amendment 2”) to Clinical Trial E2112 entered into on March 14, 2014 (the “Agreement”) is entered into as of July 31, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), by and between ECOG-ACRIN
Cancer Research Group, on behalf of itself and its member hospitals, institutions and physicians (the “Group,” “ECOG” or “ECOG-ACRIN”), and Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Company” or “Syndax”). 

WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, pursuant
to the Agreement, the parties agreed to certain terms specified therein for research services related to Group’s performance of the Study; and 

WHEREAS, the parties agree to revise Section 4 of the Agreement as set forth herein. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows: 

 

	A.	To Section 4.B, the words “***” are replaced by “***. 

  

	B.	This Amendment constitutes the full understanding of the parties and a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of their agreement with respect to the subject matter described herein, and no terms, conditions,
understanding, or agreement purporting to modify or vary the terms of this Amendment shall be binding unless made in writing and signed by the parties. 

  

	C.	Except to the extent amended herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 

  

	D.	Capitalized terms herein that are not defined shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement. 

  

	E.	This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall be considered one and the same instrument. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment, as of the Effective Date, by proper persons duly authorized. 

 

									
	ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group	 		 	Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
			
	 /s/ Robert L. Comis
	 		 	 /s/ John Pallies

	Name:	 	Robert L. Comis, M.D.	 		 	Name:	 	John Pallies
	Title:	 	Group Co-Chair	 		 	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer


  
 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000925663
<NAME>                        LUCAS EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1278924
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                          5610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1284534
<PP&E>                                             107934
<DEPRECIATION>                                      55682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1339831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               49224
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                            90
<COMMON>                                            14789
<OTHER-SE>                                        1275728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1339831
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   293236
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2044
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (295280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (295280)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (295280)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.02)




</TABLE>
#### Flint JESCHKE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. David T. WILLIS and Granite School District, Defendants and Appellees.

No. 890229-CA.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

June 1, 1990.

Robert B. Hansen, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff-appellant.

R. Paul Van Dam, Atty. Gen., Edward 0. Ogilvie, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendants and appellees.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon appellees’ motion to supplement the record, filed 18 April 1990. Appellees seek leave to supplement the record on appeal with the transcript of an in chambers proceeding held in the trial court on 4 October 1988.

Appellant filed the Notice of Appeal herein on 22 February 1989. Shortly thereafter, on 22 March 1989, appellant filed a Certification Regarding Transcript, certifying that he had ordered a transcript of specific portions of trial testimony. Appellant hand delivered a copy of the Certification to appellees on March 22nd.

Pursuant to Rule 11(e)(2), Utah R.App.P., appellant must include in the record a transcript of all evidence relevant to a challenged finding or conclusion. Rule 11(e)(3) provides that if appellant requests only a portion of the trial court proceedings and appellee deems additional portions necessary to the appeal, then appellee must so notify appellant. Ten days thereafter, ap-pellee may either request a transcript of the additional parts or motion the trial court for an order requiring the appellant to do so.

Appellant herein did not request transcription of the 4 October 1988 in chambers proceeding. Appellees did not immediately request the additional portion of the trial court record, nor did appellees motion the trial court for an order requiring appellant to order the transcript. Instead, more than one year after the transcript request was filed, appellees now seek leave of this Court to supplement the transcript request. Had appellees followed proper appellate procedure, the motion to supplement and resulting appellate delay could have been avoided entirely.

In considering a motion to supplement the record, the Court evaluates sever*429al factors. These include the necessity of the supplemental material, prior opportunity to introduce the supplemental material and length of the resulting delay. Under appropriate circumstances and in the interest of judicial economy, the Court will deny a motion to supplement the record.

Appellees herein had prior opportunity to supplement the transcript request. The motion, made at this late date, will delay the briefing schedule and final disposition of the matter. The parties, however have not had prior notice of the Court’s policy respecting supplemental motions. Because the Court has not previously stated its policy in this regard, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to supplement the record on appeal is granted. Appellees shall have 15 days from the date that the supplemental transcript is filed in the trial court to file their brief.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Judith M. Billings Judge Judith M. Billings

/s/Pamela T. Greenwood Judge Pamela T. Greenwood

/s/Richard C. Davidson Judge Richard C. Davidson
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

David K. Paylor 

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 

P.O. Box 1105 

Richmond, Virginia 23218 

Dear Mr. Paylor: 

SEP 2 9 2Ui't 

On July 22, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the 

Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Department of Environmental Quality pertaining to 

Major New Source Review (Rev. A14). EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and 

technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice (DFRN) action. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Cathleen Van Osten, Office 

of Permits and Air Taxies, at (215) 814-2746, or at vanosten.cathleen@epa.gov. She is the principal 

contact for this rulemaking. 

f'!t 

Sincerely, 

?!Jv/.aiJdv 

Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division 

~J Printed on I 00% recycled/recyclable paper with I 00% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. 

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
**THUNDERCLAP ENTERTAINMENT, INC.**

**(A Development Stage Enterprise)**

 

Exhibit 32.1

 

**Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-oxley act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ThunderclapEntertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (“Report”), I, Gary L. Blum, the Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

1.                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
Exhibit 10.2


 


 


Amendment No. 2

 of the


EnSync, Inc. 2012 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan


(formerly the ZBB Energy Corporation 2012 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan)







This Amendment No. 2 (the "Amendment"), dated September 17, 2015, of the 2012 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan (the "Existing Plan"; as amended hereby, the "Plan"), of EnSync, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (the "Company"), is made and adopted by the Company, subject to approval of the shareholders of the Company.


Statement of Purpose







The Existing Plan was originally approved by the Company's Board of Directors on September 6, 2012, and by its shareholders on November 7, 2012, and became effective on such date.  The Existing Plan was previously amended pursuant to that certain Amendment No. 1, effective upon shareholder approval on September 17, 2014.  The Board may amend the Existing Plan at any time, pursuant to and subject to Section 5.2 of the Existing Plan, contingent on approval by the shareholders of the Company, if shareholder approval is required by applicable securities exchange rules or applicable law.  The Board has determined that it is advisable and in the best interest of the Company to amend the Existing Plan to increase the number of shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.01, authorized for issuance under the Existing Plan by 1,500,000 shares.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Existing Plan is hereby amended as follows, subject to approval by the shareholders of the Company:







1.            Capitalized Terms.  All capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings given thereto in the Existing Plan.


2.            Amendment to Existing Plan.  Section 4.1 of the Existing Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


"4.1.            Authorized Number of Shares







Subject to adjustment under Section 9, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to the Plan is the sum of (i) 1,700,000 shares plus (ii) effective upon September 17, 2015 (subject to shareholder approval), 1,500,000 shares."


3.            Reference to and Effect on the Plan.  The Plan, as amended hereby, and all other documents, instruments, and agreements executed and/or delivered in connection therewith, shall remain in full force and effect, and are hereby ratified and confirmed.


4.            Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Wisconsin.







*            *            *







Effective this 17th day of September, 2015.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Development Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shahbod Rastegar, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                       |                                                       
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  August 18, 2014 | /s/ Shahbod Rastegar                                  
|                       | Shahbod Rastegar Chief Executive and Financial Officer





|
|
|
|
#### Roosevelt JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1152.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 6, 1973.

Rehearings Denied Aug. 6,1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 851 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend to all veterans with 

a serious service-connected injury eligibility to participate in the family 

caregiver services program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2013 

Mr. SANDERS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend to all 

veterans with a serious service-connected injury eligibility 

to participate in the family caregiver services program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Caregivers Expansion 

5 and Improvement Act of 2013’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 851 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION TO ALL VETERANS WITH A SERIOUS 

2 SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY OF ELIGI3 BILITY FOR PARTICIPATION IN FAMILY CARE4 GIVER PROGRAM. 

5 Section 1720G(a)(2)(B) of title 38, United States 

6 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘on or after September 11, 

7 2001’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

SECURE NetCheckIn INC.

A Nevada corporation

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SECURE NetCheckIn Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Brandi DeFoor, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentication, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed from within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|  

SECURE NetCheckIn INC.

Dated: March 30, 2012

By:

  /s/ *Brandi L. DeFoor*

 

 

Brandi L. DeFoor

 

 

President & Chief Executive Officer |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
i

,.

n?lr E-hat atatutc geverns the managcrccnt and operation of the Pabert n. Green nospiw, San AntGnio P&r r&&t for an opinion on the folloaing has been 

### rooclvcd by 

### this offleet *First, Does !Waw County fall within &he terns of ArCiClC 443739 (Aots of w27, 40th Log., p. 322, ch. 2S9), 

### a epl3ci6.l

statute .goVCrllin& couutl.es !rnvl.nga populnt?lonof 2MrOO0 inhzbitnnte as s!loznby the **CCUSUS Of**  **182!0~), OF**  **is** 

### it &qveruo3 by the general statute, Article 44~~ (as acxndcd hy Acts I3278 4t)tbLeg*, PI 2f& C& If%* SCA IT) 

### l EcccJndr

AaLssuctnin~

bnt wxarCollllty falls oitiiint110 ter3s Of the special statute, Article 4437~1, Is the att?tuto

### rmdcrcd inval’rdIn Its a.ppl%catiOz~ to fic?JLp C-w mr any of tic followinn, **rcnsons:** 1. t;yrciesn **GP** the fact t33t tkc tcrYl‘census of 19r) ia tco vnqm?, indcfinito nnd unccrtclinazi3 stmdar? c?, c~asrifimtim, fii:icc it :locaxx3

t qwcify what ccnsuo is to be usctlas a stant:arc;.
, .,:.

‘2, By 

### reason of the fact that, since

. it is limited to counties having a pcpulation of 23),030 In 1920, thus prccludinfi its application to Others subsequently ottainin::that populction, it contravenes the constitutional prohibition against local and special lcgislation~ .’



### *Third; Assmine that Dosar County S&l originals wlt!linthe t@ms Gf'the gcncral statute, Art. 447$, because it did uot have a population of 213,000 in loa, would it subscqucntly be 

### rcaoved from the OpcratiOn Gf Article 4473 a2ld phw.xi within the scope of 4437a by reason of the fact that its populcbtlon l?ter exooeded 213,oOOT'

In reply to your first question, it is our opinion that BCX3l' COW'lt~; il8ViZl~ G POptiatiGXl in =a Of Xt2,03g Inhabitants,: norildfall within the tcms of Articlc 4473-(as zazondcdby Acts 3027, 43th Lcaslature, page 626, Chapter Iw, Sec. L )

The aim and object of construing lc@slation is toasocrtain and eilfotice the le~islatlvo intent. @The intention of the Le@slaturo In cnactinp: a latiis the law its&f," 

### "the essence of the la+ ar.d 'the s#rit which @vcs life to the enactrrent.a 33 Tcx. dur, 0, 86, Poph3n vs. Patterson, 51 SY (2) RS0; Schlcnier 980 Board of Trwtccs, KI SP (2) 264; ;lorton Salt Co. vbells, 35 SW (2) 4%

It is clear, WC thinx, that the Intention nf the LQtislaturo 

### wasthat only counties havin: a po~ulatinn cf ~10~000 inhabitants in XIX) acre to bc I;ovcrncdby ;?rtiClC +a370 (A&s 

### Gf X!27, atth Lc&?i~atllrC, p. 322, chap. 2X?),

we bCliovC this also ansvcrs your third oucsticrl. W fact that a county~s pGpu.laticnr.i#t lstcr escccd :D01000 inhabitants wGu$d not bring sxlrl. county CitJiin the

____..e( ”Unflerthis opinion, vo do not bolicvo 3t io necessary to mm-m- your sccoml question, &I.UC to the fact that in any event **Eouar** Cumty is not govemcd by Article 4437~.
Yqre very truly

. ATTOIWEY GE2iEilAb. OF TEXiW

/ CORt%R APPR6VM 1