alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 8 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                  S. 8

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the need to enact legislation to 
                   eliminate wasteful tax loopholes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 22 (legislative day, January 3), 2013

 Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Schumer, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. 
  Lautenberg, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Brown, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Sanders, Mrs. 
Boxer, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Coons, and Mr. Levin) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                               on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate on the need to enact legislation to 
                   eliminate wasteful tax loopholes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End Wasteful Tax Loopholes Act''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON THE ELIMINATION OF TAX LOOPHOLES.

    It is the sense of the Senate that Congress should enact 
legislation to--
            (1) eliminate wasteful tax loopholes that create incentives 
        for taxpayers to engage in transactions that have no economic 
        substance solely to lower their tax bills;
            (2) eliminate corporate tax loopholes and wasteful tax 
        breaks for special interests;
            (3) enhance tax fairness by reforming or eliminating tax 
        breaks that provide excessive benefits to millionaires and 
        billionaires;
            (4) crack down on tax cheaters and close the tax gap;
            (5) use the revenue saved by curtailing tax loopholes to 
        reduce the Federal deficit and reform the Federal tax code;
            (6) address provisions in the Federal tax code that make it 
        more profitable for companies to create jobs overseas than in 
        the United States; and
            (7) reform the Federal tax code in a manner that promotes 
        job creation, competitiveness, and economic growth in the 
        United States.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.9 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, dla, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6603

FRED CARSWELL, III,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

G. RAMIREZ, Warden FCI Williamsburg,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Florence. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (4:17-cv-01231-BHH)

Submitted: July 26, 2018 Decided: July 31, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Carswell, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Fred Carswell, III a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting 

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Carswell v. Ramirez, No. 4:17-cv-01231-BHH (D.S.C. May 15, 2018). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
#### James E. Dolan, Respondent, v Susan D. Ross, Formerly Known as Susan D. Dolan, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: The parties were divorced in 1977. The judgment of divorce incorporated, without merger, the terms of a 1976 separation agreement which awarded defendant exclusive use and possession of the marital residence until she remarried. At that time, the house was to be sold, and the proceeds equally divided. Plaintiff gave defendant a quitclaim deed to the property in 1978. The following year he filed a bankruptcy petition, and a few months thereafter, defendant remarried. Plaintiff, upon learning that defendant had listed the property for sale, commenced the subject action in May 1990, seeking an order directing that the property be sold and a declaration that he held a one-half interest in the premises and was entitled to half of the proceeds of the sale. He asserted that the deed was executed with the understanding that his one-half interest in the property would remain unaffected by the conveyance. On appeal, defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in denying her pre-answer motion to dismiss on Statute of Limitations grounds.

*1014The complaint essentially seeks specific performance of that portion of the separation agreement requiring a sale of the property upon defendant’s remarriage, or of the divorce judgment incorporating that agreement and a judgment declaring that plaintiff is entitled to recover a one-half interest in the property. The request for specific performance was not commenced within six years of defendant’s remarriage *(see,*CPLR 213 [2]; *Tauber v Lebow,*65 NY2d 596), and plaintiff failed to demonstrate that he was an owner in possession of the premises within ten years of the commencement of this action for a judgment declaring plaintiff’s right to recover an interest in the property *(see,*CPLR 212 [a]; *James v Lewis,*135 AD2d 785). The action was time-barred and should have been dismissed. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Miller, J.—Dismiss Complaint.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Balio, Lowery and Davis, JJ.
----

----

I Informácie

Komisia

----

SPOLOČNÝ KATALÓG ODRÔD DRUHOV ZELENINY

1. dodatok 23. úplnému vydaniu

(2005/C 51 A/01)

OBSAH

Vysvetlivky

Zoznamdruhov zeleniny

LEGENDA

2.ALLIUM CEPA L.

3.ALLIUM FISTULOSUM L.

4.ALLIUM PORRUM L.

7.APIUM GRAVEOLENS L.

8.ASPARAGUS OFFICINALIS L.

9.BETA VULGARIS L. VAR. VULGARIS

10.BETA VULGARIS L. VAR. CONDITIVA ALEF.

12.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. BOTRYTIS (L.) ALEF. VAR. BOTRYTIS L.

13.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. BOTRYTIS (L.) ALEF. VAR. CYMOSA DUCH.

14.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. OLERACEA VAR. GEMMIFERA DC.

15.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. CAPITATA (L.) ALEF. VAR. SABAUDA L.

16.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. CAPITATA (L.) ALEF. VAR. ALBA DC.

17.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. CAPITATA (L.) ALEF. VAR. RUBRA DC.

18.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. ACEPHALA (DC.) ALEF. VAR. GONGYLODES

19.BRASSICA PEKINENSIS (LOUR.) RUPR.

20.BRASSICA RAPA L. VAR. RAPA

21.CAPSICUM ANNUUM L.

22.CICHORIUM ENDIVIA L.

23.CICHORIUM INTYBUS L. (PARTIM)

24.CICHORIUM INTYBUS L. (PARTIM)

25.CITRULLUS LANATUS (THUNB.) MATSUM. ET NAKAI

26.CUCUMIS MELO L.

27.CUCUMIS SATIVUS L.

28.CUCURBITA MAXIMA DUCHESNE

29.CUCURBITA PEPO L.

31.CYNARA SCOLYMUS L.

32.DAUCUS CAROTA L.

33.FOENICULUM VULGARE MILLER

34.LACTUCA SATIVA L.

35.LYCOPERSICON LYCOPERSICUM (L.) KARSTEN EX FARW.

36.PETROSELINUM CRISPUM (MILLER) NYMAN EX A. W. HILL

37.PHASEOLUS COCCINEUS L.

38.PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.

39.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

40.RAPHANUS SATIVUS L.

43.SOLANUM MELONGENA L.

44.SPINACIA OLERACEA L.

45.VALERIANELLA LOCUSTA (L.) LATERR.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

----

(1)Ú. v. EÚ C 260 A, 22.10.2004, s. 1.

(2)Ú. v. ES L 193, 20.7.2002, s. 33.

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.15 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, Resiliency Training

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
**EXHIBIT 8.1**

 

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

 
| **Subsidiaries**                      | ** ** | **Jurisdiction**        |
|---------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------|
|                                  |       |                    |
| Embotelladora Andina Chile S.A.       |       | Chile                   |
| Andina Inversiones Societarias S.A.   |       | Chile                   |
| Andina  Bottling Investments Dos S.A. |       | Chile                   |
| Andina  Bottling Investments S.A.     |       | Chile                   |
| Servicios  Multivending Ltda.         |       | Chile                   |
| Transportes  Andina Refrescos Ltda.   |       | Chile                   |
| Vital  Aguas S.A.                     |       | Chile                   |
| Vital  S.A.                           |       | Chile                   |
| Rio de Janeiro Refrescos Ltda.        |       | Brazil                  |
| Embotelladora del Atlántico S.A. |       | Argentina               |
| Abisa  Corp.                          |       | British  Virgin Islands |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND AS OF
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000925661
<NAME> PLASMATRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,277
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,523)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (110)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (110)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (163)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Axim Biotechnologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2018 (the “Report”), I, Dr. George Anastassov, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1)the Report, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.   Dated: August 14, 2018By:/s/ Dr. George AnastassovDr. George Anastassov
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
| (1)   |  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 14, 2012 | By:          /s/ Kevin B. Halter, Jr.             |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   | Kevin B. Halter, Jr.                                                                                                                                       |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                    |
|                   | and Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                |

----
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LUIMAR APONTE RODRIGUEZ,

A/K/A LUIMAR APONTERODRIGUEZ

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00240

- CR

Appeal from the

372nd Judicial District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 1303976D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hu ghes, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8113

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LLOYD PRESTON KNIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon,

Senior District Judge. (3:07-cr-00031-NKM-5; 3:11-cv-80317-NKMRSB)

Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: June 4, 2013

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd Preston Knight, Appellant Pro Se. Ray Burton Fitzgerald, 

Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ronald Mitchell 

Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lloyd Preston Knight seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Knight has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 533 

To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

System Unit L06, Topsail, North Carolina. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2013 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal 

Barrier Resources System Unit L06, Topsail, North 

Carolina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

4 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map included in the set of 

6 maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ re7 ferred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources 

8 Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to Unit L06 in 

9 North Carolina is hereby replaced by another map relating 

10 to the same unit entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 533 IS

1 Resources System Corrected Unit L06’’ and dated 

2 llllll. 

3 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

4 shall keep the replacement map referred to in subsection 

5 (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

6 section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

7 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS