alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Court of Appeals of the State of Geo rgia

ATLA NTA,

_________________ _ The Court of

Appeals he reby passes

the followi

ng order: A14A2248. RU FUS MAZYCK v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK ASSOCIATION. JP Morgan Chase Ba

nk Associa

tion filed a

dispossessor

y action against

Rufus Mazyck in ma gistrate c ourt. Following an advers e judgment, Maz yck appealed to t

he state co urt, whi ch entere d final j udgmen t and a wr

it of posses sion in favor

of J P Morgan. Mazy ck then appe aled dire ctl y to this Court. We, however, lack jurisdic tion. Becausethe order to be appealed disposes of a de nov o ap pea l fr om a magis trate court deci sion, Mazyck was re quired to follow t he di scretionary appeal procedure s. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor M ortgage Corp. East , 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1 995). Hi s failure to do so depr

ives us of jurisdicti on over th is appeal, wh ich is here by DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Offi

ce, Atlant a,_______________

___ I certify t hat the ab ove is a true extract from the minutes of the Court

of Appeals

of Georgia. Witness my si

gnat ure and the seal

of said co urt hereto aff

ixed the day and year last above writt

en. , Clerk. 08/26/2014 August 26, 2014
# Instructions

# FY24 2Q Forecast

# Forecast By Office

# Acronyms

# Data Validation
----

----

III Oplysninger

Rådet

----

MIDLERTIDIG STILLING

Ref. B/018

SOCIALRÅDGIVER

(2005/C 88 A/01)

Generalsekretariatet for Rådet for Den Europæiske Union ønsker at besætte en ledig midlertidig stilling i kategori B*, lønklasse 5, i direktorat A 1B, Personale og Administration, i Bruxelles.

Den sociale tjeneste i Generalsekretariatet for Rådet for Den Europæiske Union yder tjenestemænd og deres familier samt pensionerede tjenestemænd bistand i vanskelige situationer. Den sociale tjeneste har også blandt sine hovedopgaver at lette integrationen af nye tjenestemænd og deres familier, at gøre det lettere at forene privatliv og arbejdsliv og at fremme etableringen af tætte forbindelser med pensionerede kolleger.

Yderligere oplysninger og ansøgningsskema kan fås ved at kontakte Udvælgelses- og Ansættelseskontoret på følgende e-mail adresse:

service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int

eller via dets websted:

http://ue.eu.int/concours

Ansøgningsfrist: den 10. maj 2005, idet poststemplet er afgørende.

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Intelligence AgencyCOMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN DEFENSE OF THE NATION

Search
Search

Search
                    - Facilities Operating Status
                    - Employee Resources

-  Home		 
-  About    -  FAQs             
  -  Organization      -  Locations             
    -  Missile and Space Intelligence Center             
    -  Joint Military Attache School             
    -  Joint Military Intelligence Training Center 
  -  Office of the Inspector General             
  -  Equal Opportunity & Diversity             
  -  Military Integration Office             
  -  History      -  DIA Museum             
    -  George Washington Letters             
    -  Directors of DIA             
    -  The Historians 
  -  Patriots Memorial             
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response             
  -  Contact Us 
-  News & Features    -  Articles             
  -  Videos             
  -  DIA in the News             
  -  Threat Reports             
  -  Photo Gallery             
  -  No FEAR             
  -  Podcasts             
  -  DIA Comics 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Career Fields      -  Analysis             
    -  Counterintelligence             
    -  Finance & Acquisition             
    -  Human Intelligence             
    -  Human Services             
    -  Information Technology             
    -  Inspector General             
    -  Legal             
    -  Mission Management             
    -  Office Management & Infrastructure             
    -  Science & Technology             
    -  Security 
  -  Search Vacancies             
  -  Apply to DIA             
  -  Hiring Process             
  -  Internships             
  -  Veteran Programs 
-  Business    -  Contractor Personnel Security             
  -  SIA3             
  -  SITE III             
  -  Innovation             
  -  NeedipeDIA             
  -  Office of Small Business Programs             
  -  Small Business FAQs 

HOMENEWS & FEATURES

Search

Search

                            - All Images 
                            - Other 

                            - Upload Date
                            - Photo Date
                            - Title

Clear Search4 results found.
Exhibit
32.1



Certification
of CEO Pursuant To

18
U.S.C. Section 1350,

As
Adopted Pursuant To

Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2018 of Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Sven-Olof Lindblad, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | 1) | the
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                             
| | 2) | the
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



|Date:
    August 2, 2018 |                                          
|------------------------ | -----------------------------------------
|                         |                                          
|                         | /s/
    Sven-Olof Lindblad               
|                         | Sven-Olof
    Lindblad                   
|                         | Chief
    Executive Officer and President



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: February 25, 2016 107020

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN L. ZIPPO, Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: January 6, 2016 Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Rose and Devine, JJ.

__________ Paul J. Connolly, Delmar, for appellant, and appellant pro se. Karen Heggen, District Attorney, Ballston Spa (Kristin Foust of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Rose, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, J.), rendered April 24, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted robbery in the first degree. Defendant was charged by indictment with one count each of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, all of which arose out of a robbery of two victims at knifepoint. Defendant's motion to suppress the evidence was denied, and he then pleaded guilty to a reduced count of attempted robbery in the first degree in satisfaction of the indictment. As a condition of the plea bargain, he agreed to-2- 107020

waive his right to appeal, both orally and in writing. Before accepting defendant's waiver, County Court explained that his right to appeal was separate and distinct from those rights given up when a plea of guilty is entered. In addition, defendant acknowledged that his counsel had explained the meaning of the appeal waiver to him. Defendant was subsequently sentenced as a second felony offender in accordance with the plea agreement. Defendant's sole challenge on appeal concerns County Court's decision denying his motion to suppress the evidence that led to his arrest. However, his knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal precludes his challenge to the adverse suppression ruling (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; People v Stone, 105 AD3d 1094, 1095 [2013]; People v Colon, 101 AD3d 1161, 1161-1162 [2012], lv denied 21 NY3d 1003 [2013]). While the better practice is for County Court to advise defendant at the time of the plea that his waiver included the right to appeal the suppression issue (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d at 833), defendant signed a written waiver whereby he agreed to waive his right to appeal on several grounds,including "[t]he decision and order of [County] Court on any pretrial motions made by the defendant." Thus, defendant's appeal waiver was not qualified or limited in any way. Further, defendant's counsel made it abundantly clear at the time of sentencing that defendant understood that his appeal waiver applied to County Court's suppression ruling. McCarthy, J.P., Garry and Devine, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.2:

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Hudson Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James R. Buscemi, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



``



|s/ James R. Buscemi    
|-----------------------
|James R. Buscemi       
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|March 24, 2004
----

Action brought on 21 January 2005 by Halcor Metal Works S.A. against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-21/05)

(2005/C 82/66)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 21 January 2005 by Halcor Metal Works S.A., established in Athens (Greece), represented by I. S. Forrester, Barrister and A. P. Schulz and A. Komninos, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant contests the fine imposed on it by the Commission's Decision of 3 September 2004 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81(1) EC in Case Comp/E-1/38-069 finding three separate infringements in the copper plumbing tube sector.

In support of it application, the applicant submits in the first place that its conduct did not deserve a fine. According to the applicant, its conduct did not involve behaviour worthy of a fine under Article 81 EC, in that it was subject to coercion from the other addressees of the decision and in that its participation in the cartel, as an export- and growth-oriented undertaking, was reluctant and passive.

The applicant also submits that the starting point of its fine was manifestly erroneously set and infringes the principle of equal treatment. The applicant states that, whereas the decision accuses other addressees of engaging in three separate infringements, the applicant is accused of engaging in only one while the basic amount of the fine was calculated in the same manner for all addressees. The applicant also claims that it did not reinforce the arrangements and that the geographical scope of the infringement in the decision wrongly included Greece.

The applicant furthermore submits that the increase for duration constitutes a manifest error of appreciation and an error in law.

Finally, the applicant claims that the fine imposed on it was disproportionate by comparison to the fines imposed on the other addressees of the decision and in the light of the applicant's particular circumstances. The applicant refers in this respect to its voluntarily termination of its attendance at the meetings in 1999, two years before the Commission heard allegations about the cartel, to the short duration of its attendance at the meetings, to its passive presence and to the fact that it furnished the Commission with complete documentation on which the statement of objections and the decision were based.

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.04 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0404

_____________________________ A

ARON C. D AVENPORT , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. William F. Stone , Judge

. March 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OWE , and M AKAR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney Gen eral, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the quarterly report of Neutra Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Sydney Jim, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date: September 23, 2019BY: /s/ Sydney JimSydney JimPresident, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Sole Director  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2016-5035 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NM-042-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

SB Inspection 1.0 $ 85.00 0 $ 85.00 8 $ 680.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 680

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

SB Repair 46.0 $3,910.00 $2,000 $5,910.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
CNP_Exhibit 10(II)_12.31.2013






Exhibit 10(ll)
 
 
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation
 


The following is a summary of compensation paid to the non-employee directors of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) effective April 25, 2013. For additional information regarding the compensation of the non-employee directors, please read the definitive proxy statement relating to the Company’s 2014 annual meeting of shareholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.


•Annual retainer fee of $50,000 for Board membership;


•Fee of $2,000 for each Board or Committee meeting attended;


		
	•
	Supplemental annual retainer of $15,000 for serving as a chairman of the Audit Committee or Compensation Committee; and




•Supplemental annual retainer of $10,000 for serving as a chairman of any other Board committee.


Members of the special CEO Succession Planning Committee receive an annual retainer of $20,000 instead of the compensation listed above for attending committee meetings and/or serving as chairman of any Board committee.


Stock Grants. Each non-employee director may also receive an annual grant of up to 5,000 shares of CenterPoint Energy common stock which vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. Upon the initial nomination to the Board, in addition to the annual grant, a non-employee director may be granted a one-time grant of up to 5,000 shares of CenterPoint Energy common stock.


Deferred Compensation Plan. Directors may elect each year to defer all or part of their annual retainer fees, including committee chairman fees, and meeting fees. Directors participating in these plans may elect to receive distributions of their deferred compensation and interest in three ways: (i) an early distribution of either 50% or 100% of their account balance in any year that is at least four years from the year of deferral up to the year in which they reach age 70, (ii) a lump sum distribution payable in the year after they reach age 70 or upon leaving the Board of Directors, whichever is later, or (iii) 15 annual installments beginning on the first of the month coincident with or next following age 70 or upon leaving the Board of Directors, whichever is later.
| (1)   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: September 22, 2017 | By:  | /s/ John T. Bauska      |
|-------------------------------|-----------|-------------------------|
|                          |      | John T. Bauska          |
|                          |      | Chief Executive Officer |
|                          |      | and Financial Officer   |

----
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

 

No. 06-2506

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

MELVIN RICHARDSON,

Defendant, Appellant.

 

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on February 8, 2008, is amended as follows:

On Page 13, Line 16, replace "Sates" with "States"