alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-113479) and in the related Prospectus, of our report, datedFebruary 5, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Potomac Bancshares, Inc. included in the 2003 Annual Report of Shareholders and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,2003. 

 

/s/ Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C.

 

 

Winchester, Virginia 

March 29, 2004
Exhibit 32 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2022, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joshua Easterly as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ian Simmonds, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

| /s/ Joshua Easterly |
|---------------------|
| Name:               |   | Joshua Easterly |
| Title:              |   | Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:               |   | May 3, 2022 |

  

| /s/ Ian Simmonds |
|------------------|
| Name:            |   | Ian Simmonds |
| Title:           |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:            |   | May 3, 2022 |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report (the Report) on the Form 10-Q of Monarchy Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the three and six months ended April, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   Date: June 18, 2015   /s/ Timothy Ferguson TIMOTHY FERGUSON Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Oakwood Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President, Director,
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: November 9, 2011
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sheldon Midlarsky, Appellant.

Appeals by the defendant (1) from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), rendered November 28, 1983, convicting him of murder in the second degree and attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2), by permission, from an order of the same court, entered July 5, 1988, which denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, to vacate the judgment of conviction.

Ordered that the judgment and order are affirmed.

We find no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was *632denied the effective assistance of trial counsel *(see, People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137). In addition, the imposition of consecutive sentences was not illegal *(see,*Penal Law § 70.25 [2]; *People v Truesdell,*70 NY2d 809, 811; *People v Brathwaite,*63 NY2d 839; *People v Chandler,*106 AD2d 677), nor were the sentences excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Finally, the defendant’s motion, pursuant to CPL 440.10, to vacate the judgment of conviction was properly denied for reasons stated by Justice Hillery at the Supreme Court. Lawrence, J. P., Fiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
|                                   |                |                          |                           |                         
|---------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------- | ------------------------
|                                   |                | Partnership of:         
|DALE MATHESON                      | Vancouver      | Robert J. Burkart, Inc.  | James F. Carr-Hilton Ltd. | Kenneth P. Chong Inc.   
|CARR-HILTON LABONTELLP             |                | Alvin F. Dale Ltd.       | Barry S. Hartley, Inc.    | Reginald J. LaBonte Ltd.
|                                   |                | Robert J. Matheson, Inc. | Rakesh I. Patel Inc.      | F.M. Yada FCA Inc.      
|DMCL         CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS | South Surrey   | Michael K. Braun Inc.    | Peter J. Donaldson, Inc.  |                         
|                                   | Port Coquitlam | Wilfred A. Jacobson Inc. | G.D. Lee Inc.             | Fraser G. Ross, Ltd.    
|                                   |                | Brian A. Shaw Inc.       |                           |                         

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  The Board of Directors, Reg Technologies Inc.  We consent to the inclusion in the Form 20-F/A of our report dated August 24, 2009, except for Note 15 which is as of November 13, 2009, on the consolidated balance sheet of Reg Technologies Inc. as of April 30, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, stockholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended.  DMCL (signed)  DALE MATHESON CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS  Vancouver, Canada March 17, 2011


|               |                                                                                                                                
|-------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Vancouver      | (Head Office) Suite 1500  1140 West Pender Street, Vancouver, B.C., Canada  V6E 4G1, Tel:Fax:   604 689 2778  Main Reception
|South Surrey   | Suite 301  1656 Martin Drive, White Rock, B.C., Canada  V4A 6E7,  Tel: 604 531 1154  Fax: 604 538 2613                       
|Port Coquitlam | Suite 700  2755 Lougheed Highway, Port Coquitlam, B.C., Canada  V3B 5Y9,  Tel:  604 941 8266  Fax: 604 941 0971
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CHRISTOPHER COLLIER,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D18-2140

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed September 28, 2018

Petition for Belated Appeal

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Christopher Collier, Graceville, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General 

Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM. 

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the February 22, 2018,

judgment and sentence rendered in Case No. 2017-CF-772 in the Circuit Court in and 

for Hernando County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). 

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.2



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SEEC, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned , in the
capacities and dates listed below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date:  June 30, 2003                              /s/ RICHARD J. GOLDBACH
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                    Richard J. Goldbach
                                           Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 13.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant toTitle 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer of Reg Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge: 1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Reg Technologies Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Reg Technologies Inc. Seattle, Washington. by: /s/ James Vandeberg August 27, 2010 James Vandeberg
Chief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reg Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Reg Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---
#### In the Matter of Faye Smiley-Walsch, Respondent, v New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.), entered January *38331, 1990, which granted petitioner’s application to file a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The eight month delay by the administratrix in filing a notice of claim for conscious pain and suffering, and the 23 day delay as to the claim for wrongful death, was excusable, and Supreme Court acted within its discretion in permitting petitioner to file a late notice of claim. In view of the fact that respondent undisputedly received prompt and actual notice of the underlying event, and absent any *bona fide*showing of prejudice, petitioner was entitled to have her claim adjudicated on the merits *(Matter of Nayyar v Board of Educ.,*169 AD2d 628).

Respondent’s argument that an administratrix is not a person entitled to seek relief pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) *(see, e.g., Matter of Lynn v City of New York,*18 AD2d 1076, *affd*13 NY2d 955) is misplaced, as the authority relied upon predates the 1976 amendment of the statute. Concur—Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
# Federal Aviation

Administration



# Memorandum

Date: December 6, 2016

To: Docket FAA

- 2014

- 0504

From: Sheri Pippin, Air Transportation Division

Subject: Pilot Professional Development Notice of Proposed Rulemaking :

Doc ument Formatting

The FAA has received questions about the meaning of the dots in the proposed tables for part 121 appendices E and F.

The Federal Register has used ellipsis (i.e., the dots) to indicate spacing. It has no bearing

on the substantive matt ers presented in the proposal.
504

- 1 (Adopted August 3, 1975)(Amended July 3, 1981)

(Amended February 5, 1988)(Amended January 5, 1990)

RULE 504. RULES FROM WHICH VARIANCES ARE NOT ALLOWED

(a) Regulations IX and X

(1) No variance shall be granted from any rule or rules (or portions thereo f)

contained in Regulation IX or X, unless such rule or rules (or portions

thereof) are more stringent than federal New Source Performance

Standards (NSPS) requirements or National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), except as set for th in

subparagraph (2).

(2) A variance may, if appropriate, be granted from provisions of

Regulation IX or X if such provisions are more stringent than requirements

of NSPS or NESHAP and conditions are imposed on the variance requiring

compliance with appl

icable NSPS or NESHAP requirements at a minimum;

or if a waiver of NSPS or NESHAP requirements has been obtained by the

petitioner from the Environmental Protection Agency and a variance would

be consistent with the waiver.

(b) No variance shall be grant ed by the Hearing Board from any rule or provision

thereof contained in Regulation XII.

(c) No variance shall be granted by the Hearing Board from any rule setting forth

requirements for permits to construct.

(d) No variance shall be granted from the pro visions of this Rule 504.

(e) No variance or series of variances, including emergency and interim variances,

shall be granted which would allow emissions to exceed an applicable

Regulation XIII offset threshold for a period in excess of 90 days from the i nitial

granting of a variance.
#### Loren E. Rosenthal, Appellant, v Elaine Rosenthal, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered on or about October 30, 1990, which granted defendant’s motion to confirm and denied plaintiffs cross-motion to reject the Referee’s report dated May 14, 1990, and ordered a hearing before a Referee on the issue of damages, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this matrimonial action, defendant is seeking, *inter alia,*an accounting and money judgment against plaintiff for unpaid balance of additional alimony and child support under a separation agreement, dated July 1, 1975, which was incorporated, but not merged, into a judgment of divorce. Pursuant to the separation agreement, plaintiff is required to pay an additional amount for maintenance and child support equal to one third of his annual net income in excess of $20,000 as defined by line 28, form 1040 in excess of $20,000. At the time of the divorce, it was expected that plaintiff, a physician, would enter private practice. Instead, he became a salaried employee of a professional medical corporation. In an order dated November 13, 1979, the Supreme Court determined that the separation agreement was intended to include income derived directly from his profession, and was applicable to salary reported in his W-2 form, which order was affirmed by this Court *(Rosenthal v Rosenthal,*75 AD2d 515).

In 1980, plaintiff became a one-third shareholder in the medical corporation, but refused to pay excess alimony and child support based on contributions by the corporation to plaintiff’s pension and profit sharing plans. The matter was referred to a Special Referee, who determined in favor of defendant, finding plaintiff was avoiding the financial require-*299merits of the separation agreement. Supreme Court confirmed the Referee’s report.

Contrary to plaintiffs contention, this action is not barred by the doctrines of *res judicata*or law of the case as the facts raised herein were not before the court in 1979 *(see, Smith v Russell Sage Coll.,*54 NY2d 185, 192; *Werthner v Olenin,*186 Misc 829, *affd*272 App Div 798). Nor is the action barred by the six years statute of limitations which accrued at the time of plaintiffs breach, not at the time of execution of the separation agreement or the earlier court determination. Finally, we agree with the conclusion of the Special Referee that the contributions were included within the definition of annual net income as defined by the separation agreement. The motion to strike the reply brief is denied. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Lespier, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered on or about March 17, 1989, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

*435Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Kassal, JJ.
# Official Journal C 76/30 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 76 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4830 March 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 76

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4830 March 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 076/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 076/2 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2005/C 076/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3767 — BHP/WMC) (1) | 3 |
| 2005/C 076/4 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 1999/5/EC (1) | 4 |
| | EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | EFTA Surveillance Authority |
| 2005/C 076/5 | Public holidays in 2005: EEA EFTA States and EEA institutions | 30 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 076/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 076/2

Euro exchange rates

2

2005/C 076/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3767 — BHP/WMC) (1)

3

2005/C 076/4

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 1999/5/EC (1)

4

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA Surveillance Authority

2005/C 076/5

Public holidays in 2005: EEA EFTA States and EEA institutions

30

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 076/6 | Notice of invitation to tender for the reduction in the import duty on maize imported from non-member countries | 31 |

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 076/6

Notice of invitation to tender for the reduction in the import duty on maize imported from non-member countries

31

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2005/C 076/7 | Corrigendum to the notice ‘Holidays in 2005’ (OJ C 65, 17.3.2005) | 32 |

Corrigenda

2005/C 076/7

Corrigendum to the notice ‘Holidays in 2005’ (OJ C 65, 17.3.2005)

32

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Advant -e Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  |                                           
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: March 23, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JASON K. WADZINSKI
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                           | 
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  | Jason K. Wadzinski Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
the undersigned officer of Advant -e Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: March 23, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JAMES E. LESCH
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                       | 
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | James E. Lesch Director of Accounting



56