alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Murray Rothstein, Respondent, v Provident Life and Casualty Insurance Company, Appellant.

Order of Supreme Court, New York County (Francis N. Pécora, J.), entered November 14, 1990, which denied the application of defendant Provident Life and Casualty Insurance Company to vacate a temporary restraining order, granted plaintiffs application for a preliminary injunction, enjoined and restrained Provident from terminating extended major medical health insurance benefits for the plaintiff pursuant to Policy No. 9915, enjoined and restrained Provident from cancelling or modifying Policy 9915, directed Provident to accept payments of premiums when paid upon Policy 9915, and enjoined and restrained Provident from terminating plaintiffs benefits under Policy 9915, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS court did not abuse its discretion in granting the preliminary injunctive relief herein based upon the affidavits and other evidence before i. With reference to defendant’s *314application for the posting by plaintiff of a suitable undertaking as required by CPLR 6312 (b) *(see, Litwa v Litwa,*89 AD2d 581; *City Store Gates Mfg. v United Steel Prods.,*79 AD2d 671), we simply note that this issue is presently *sub judice*before the IAS court.

We have considered defendant’s remaining argument with regard to plaintiff’s entitlement to preliminary injunctive relief and find it to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
#### Karen STILLING, Plaintiff, v. Richard L. SKANKEY, dba Olympus Hills Mall, Defendant, Cross-Claimant, and Appellant, v. Timothy F. THOMAS; William F. Thomas, Stephen G. Petersen, and John M. Hammond dba Thomas, Petersen, Hammond & Associates, Cross-claim Defendants and Appellees.

No. 880197.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Nov. 27, 1989.

John D. Parken and Marcella L. Keck, Salt Lake City, for defendant, cross-claimant, and appellant.

Fred R. Silvester, Charles P. Sampson, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff.

Mark S. Gustavson and Charles A. Schultz, Salt Lake City, for cross-claim defendants and appellees.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from an order of the trial court, dismissing with prejudice his cross-claim for indemnity against appellees on the ground that the seven-year statute of repose, Utah Code Ann. § 78-12-25.5 (1987), (amended 1988), cut off appellant’s right of action against the architects and engineers from whom appellant sought indemnification in a tort claim.

In *Horton v. Goldminer’s Daughter,*785 P.2d 1087 (Utah 1989) and *Sun Valley Water Beds of Utah v. Herm Hughes & Son, Inc.,*782 P.2d 188 (Utah 1989), this Court held that the Utah architects and builders statute of repose is unconstitutional under the open courts provision of article I, section 11 of the Utah Constitution.

Those two cases are dispositive here, and the case is remanded to the trial court for a trial on the merits of appellant’s cross-claim.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
              FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


(In thousands, except per share data)                  1997     1996     1995
<S>                                                   <C>      <C>      <C>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Computation of Net Income Per Common Share
   Net income available to common
      shareholders - basic                            $20,255  $12,745  $ 8,426
   Minority interests in earnings of the Operating
      Partnership                                       6,219    3,064    2,681
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Net income available to common
      shareholders - diluted                          $26,474  $15,809  $11,107
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Weighted average common shares - basic              16,357   11,512    8,171
   Dilutive securities -
      Units of limited partnership interest
        in the Operating Partnership                    5,023    2,768    2,589
      Stock options                                       200      106       72
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Weighted average common shares - diluted            21,580   14,386   10,832
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Net Income Per Common Share
   Basic                                              $  1.24  $  1.11  $  1.03
   Diluted                                               1.23     1.10     1.03
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.05 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, IWatch

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131457 & (46) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. JAMES GILLESPIE, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 131457 

 COA: 268263 
 Wayne CC: 04-431052-CK

RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC., and 

RANDAL J. ARMSTRONG,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of September 26, 2006, this case was remanded to the Court of Appeals 

for an explanation of the conclusion that the defendants’ application for leave to appeal 

grossly disregarded the requirements of a fair presentation of the issues to the court. On 

March 8, 2007, the Court of Appeals issued an opinion stating reasons for the sanctions it 

imposed pursuant to MCR 7.216(C)(1)(b). On order of the Court, the application for 

leave to appeal the May 5, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is again considered, and it 

is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed 

by this Court. 

s0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for period ended June 30, 2015 (the Report) of GSV Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael T. Moe, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Michael T. MoeName: Michael T. Moe Date:  August 10, 2015
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.44 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, DLA Distribution Warner Robins, dla, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 874 

To prohibit universal service support of commercial mobile service through 

the Lifeline program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2013 

Mr. VITTER (for himself, Mr. INHOFE, and Mr. COATS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To prohibit universal service support of commercial mobile 

service through the Lifeline program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ending Mobile Phone 

5 Welfare Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LIFELINE SUPPORT FOR COM7 MERCIAL MOBILE SERVICE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—A provider of commercial mobile 

9 service may not receive universal service support under 

10 sections 214(e) and 254 of the Communications Act of 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 874 IS

1 1934 (47 U.S.C. 214(e); 254) for the provision of such 

2 service through the Lifeline program of the Federal Com3 munications Commission. 

4 (b) COMMERCIAL MOBILE SERVICE DEFINED.—In 

5 this section, the term ‘‘commercial mobile service’’ has the 

6 meaning given such term in section 332(d)(1) of the Com7 munications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 332(d)(1)). 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 1.6





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Development Capital Group, Inc.., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andriy Korobkin, the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|  |                                                                                                                                                          | 
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. | 
|  |                                                                                                                                                          | 
|  |                                                                                                                                                          | 
|  |                                                                                                                                                          | 
|  |                                                                                                                                                          | 





|Dated: August17  , 2012     |  |  |  | 
|--------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                            |  |  |  | 
|                            |  |  |  | 
|Andriy Korobkin             |  |  |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer and |  |  |  | 
|                            |  |  |  |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cardo Medical, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Derrick Romine, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to  §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Derrick Romine
                      Derrick RomineChief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  March 31, 2010

---
## IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-20377 JOSYE BROOKTER, Plaintiff - Appellant v. GC SERVICES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; DLS ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; GC FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10-CV-3149 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### After reading the briefs, studying the record, and hearing the arguments of the parties, we are convinced that the district court committed no reversible error. Therefore, its judgment is AFFIRMED. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D May7, 201 2 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion s houldnot * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### Case: 11-20377 Document: 00511846468 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2012
Order entered September 6, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01429-CR

No. 05-17-01430-CR

No. 05-17-01431-CR

CHRISTOPHER LAJUAN DAVIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F-0972077-M, F10-72780-M, F12-70385-M

ORDER

We REINSTATE the appeals.

By order entered August 30, 2018, the Court abated these appeals to allow the trial court 

to determine why appellant had not been given access to the clerk’s record in cause no. 05-17-

01430-CR. Counsel has now filed written verification that the record has been transmitted to 

appellant.

Appellant’s pro response to the Anders brief shall be due on or before October 10, 2018.
–2–

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order, by electronic 

transmission, to Ernest White, Presiding Judge, 194th Judicial District Court; Valencia Bush, 

counsel for appellant; and to counsel for the State.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to 

Christopher Lajuan Davis; TDCJ No. 2139704; Hutchins Unit; 1500 E. Langdon Road; Dallas, 

Texas 75241. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Peter G. Cochran, Respondent. Eastman Kodak Company, Appellant; Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 1, 1990, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reversed the Administrative Law Judge, who had found that certain comments made by claimant to his supervisor amounted to insubordination and constituted misconduct. The differing versions of the confrontation created only questions of fact for the Board to resolve *(see, Matter of Brewer [Levine],*53 AD2d 751). The Board found that claimant’s statements were mistakenly construed as a threat and that claimant was therefore eligible to receive benefits. Under the circumstances, the conclusion that claimant’s actions did not rise to the level of misconduct is supported by substantial evidence and the decision in claimant’s favor must be upheld *(see, Matter of Garcia [Hallen Plastics Corp.—Roberts]*104 AD2d 675, 676-677).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 179 (Friday, September 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 46733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19923]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9041-3]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 09/03/2018 Through 09/07/2018
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20180209, Final, GSA, MD, 2018 Master Plan for the 
Consolidation of the U.S. FDA HQ Final Environmental Impact Statement, 
Review Period Ends: 10/15/2018, Contact: Paul Gyamfi 202-440-3405
EIS No. 20180210, Final, USN, VA, Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing, 
Review Period Ends: 10/15/2018, Contact: Todd Kraft 757-836-2943
EIS No. 20180211, Adoption, NIGC, CA, Final Environmental Impact 
Statement--Wilton Rancheria, Review Period Ends: 10/15/2018, Contact: 
Austin Badger 202-632-7003

    Dated: September 10, 2018.
Robert Tomiak,
Director, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2018-19923 Filed 9-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P