alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

(Second Chamber)

of 13 January 2005

in Case C-84/03 Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (1)

(Failure to fulfil obligations - Directives 93/36/EEC and 93/37/EEC - Public contracts - Award procedure for public supply and public works contracts - Scope - Definition of contracting authority - Inter-administrative cooperation agreements - Definition of contract - Use of the negotiated procedure in cases not provided for by the directive)

(2005/C 82/04)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-84/03, concerning an action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC, brought on 26 February 2003 by the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: K. Wiedner and G. Valero Jordana) against the Kingdom of Spain (Agent: S. Ortiz Vaamonde), the Court of Justice (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen, J. Makarczyk (Rapporteur), G. Arestis and J. Klučka, Judges; Advocate General, J. Kokott; Registrar, R. Grass, gave a judgment on 13 January 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 101 of 26.4.2003

----
FORM OF AMENDMENT TO


CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORPORATION’S


1995 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


AND


ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN


 


 


On September 19, 2013, the Board of Directors
of Citizens & Northern Corporation (the “Corporation”) amended the Corporation’s 1995 Stock Incentive Plan
and Annual Incentive Plan to add the following provision:


 


Recoupment.  Amounts allocated
or paid pursuant to this Plan shall be subject to recovery by the Corporation under any claw back, recovery, recoupment or similar
policy hereafter adopted by the Corporation, whether in connection with Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, as amended from time to time, or otherwise, whether or not required by law.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Intelligence AgencyCOMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN DEFENSE OF THE NATION

Search
Search

Search
                    - Facilities Operating Status
                    - Employee Resources

-  Home		 
-  About    -  FAQs             
  -  Organization      -  Locations             
    -  Missile and Space Intelligence Center             
    -  Joint Military Attache School             
    -  Joint Military Intelligence Training Center 
  -  Open Source Intelligence             
  -  Equal Opportunity & Diversity             
  -  History      -  DIA Museum             
    -  George Washington Letters             
    -  Directors of DIA             
    -  The Historians 
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response             
  -  Contact Us 
-  News & Features    -  Articles             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  Videos             
  -  DIA in the News             
  -  Threat Reports             
  -  Photo Gallery             
  -  No FEAR             
  -  Podcasts 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Career Fields      -  Analysis             
    -  Counterintelligence             
    -  Finance & Acquisition             
    -  Human Intelligence             
    -  Human Services             
    -  Information Technology             
    -  Inspector General             
    -  Legal             
    -  Mission Management             
    -  Office Management & Infrastructure             
    -  Science & Technology             
    -  Security 
  -  Search Vacancies             
  -  Apply to DIA             
  -  Hiring Process             
  -  Internships             
  -  Veteran Programs 
-  Business    -  Contractor Personnel Security             
  -  SIA3             
  -  SITE III             
  -  Innovation             
  -  NeedipeDIA             
  -  Office of Small Business Programs             
  -  Small Business FAQs 

HOMENEWS & FEATURES

Search

Search

                            - All Images 
                            - Other 

                            - Upload Date
                            - Photo Date
                            - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.86 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Potomac Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, L. Gayle Marshall Johnson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Gayle Marshall
Johnson



Gayle Marshall Johnson

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

March 29, 2004
Exhibit 23.1:

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Hudson Technologies, Inc.

Pearl River, New York

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-17133, No. 333-38598 and No. 333-129057) of Hudson Technologies, Inc. of our report dated March 9, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006.



/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP



|Valhalla New York
|-----------------
|March 13, 2007
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 781 

To modify the boundary of Yosemite National Park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2013 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mrs. BOXER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To modify the boundary of Yosemite National Park, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Yosemite National 

5 Park Boundary Expansion Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE. 

7 The purpose of this Act is to modify the boundary 

8 of Yosemite National Park to protect from potential devel9 opment the scenic and biological value of property adja10 cent to the Park. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 781 IS

1 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

2 In this Act: 

3 (1) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map en4 titled ‘‘Yosemite National Park Location Map for 

5 Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) Areas’’. 

6 (2) PARK.—The term ‘‘Park’’ means the Yo7 semite National Park in the State of California. 

8 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

9 the Secretary of the Interior. 

10 SEC. 4. YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK. 

11 (a) ACQUISITION OF LAND.— 

12 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may acquire 

13 the land or an interest in the land described in sub14 sections (b) and (c) for addition to the Park. 

15 (2) MEANS.—An acquisition of land under 

16 paragraph (1) may be made by donation, purchase 

17 from a willing seller with donated or appropriated 

18 funds, or exchange. 

19 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in 

20 subsection (a)(1) is the approximately 1,575 acres of land 

21 adjacent to the Park, as generally depicted on the map. 

22 (c) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map shall be on file 

23 and available for inspection in the appropriate offices of 

24 the National Park Service. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 781 IS

1 (d) BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.—The boundary of 

2 the Park shall be revised to reflect the acquisition of the 

3 land under subsection (a). 

4 (e) ADMINISTRATION.—The Secretary shall admin5 ister any land or interest in land acquired under sub6 section (a)(1) as part of the Park in accordance with the 

7 laws (including regulations) applicable to the Park. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-20284

Summary Calendar

_____________________

TED LAWRENCE ROBERTSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SALLY KEYS; KATHY HOLTON; TEENA WATSON;

DENISE MARKECH; GORDON WHITE, JR.;

JOHN HEALY; PERRY R. HILLEGEIST, JR.;

MIKE ROZELL,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-95-1479

_________________________________________________________________

December 3, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ted Lawrence Robertson appeals the district court’s dismissal

of his pro se, in forma pauperis 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for

failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). He

contends that the district court erred by construing his action as
-2-

filed under only § 1983 and argues that his action should have been

construed as filed under both § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 1985. The

district court did not err in its interpretation of Robertson’s

complaint, as Robertson indicated in the district court that he was

bringing his suit under § 1983.

Robertson argues that the district court erred by dismissing

his civil rights action for failure to state a claim. We have

reviewed the record and Robertson’s brief, and AFFIRM the district

court’s dismissal for essentially the same reasons set forth by the

district court. Robertson v. Keys, No. CA-H-95-1479 (S.D. Tex.

Feb. 22, 1996).

A F F I R M E D.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 11, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45826-45827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19679]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9836]
RIN 1545-BH62


Substantiation and Reporting Requirements for Cash and Noncash 
Charitable Contribution Deductions; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to final regulations (TD 
9836) that were published in the Federal Register on Monday, July 30, 
2018. The final regulations provide guidance concerning substantiation 
and reporting requirements for cash and noncash charitable 
contributions.

DATES: This correction is effective September 11, 2018 and applicable 
July 30, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Gorham at (202) 317-5091 (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations (TD 9836) that are the subject of this 
correction are under section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code.

[[Page 45827]]

Need for Correction

    As published July 30, 2018 (83 FR 36417), the final regulations (TD 
9836) contain an error that needs to be corrected.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendments:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in 
part as follows:

    Authority:  26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *

0
Par. 2. Section 1.170A-1 is amended by revising the third sentence of 
paragraph (a) to read as follows:


Sec.  1.170A-1  Charitable, etc., contributions and gifts; allowance of 
deduction.

    (a) * * * For rules relating to record keeping and return 
requirements in support of deductions for charitable contributions 
(whether by an itemizing or nonitemizing taxpayer), see Sec. Sec.  
1.170A-13 (generally applicable to contributions on or before July 30, 
2018), 1.170A-14, 1.170A-15, 1.170A-16, 1.170A-17, and 1.170A-18. * * *
* * * * *

Martin V. Franks,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2018-19679 Filed 9-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF HANSEN, BARNETT & MAXWELL, P.C.**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Board of Directors

BMB Munai, Inc.

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-146834), as amended, of BMB Munai, Inc. of our report dated June 13, 2007 relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K/A-1. 

 

**HANSEN, BARNETT** **& MAXWELL, P.C.**

 

Salt Lake City, Utah

January 4, 2008
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE



## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS



### UNITED STATES ) No. ACM 40402

Appellee )

)

v. )

) ORDER

Austin T. BUCK )

Airman (E

- 2) )

U.S. Air Force )

Appellant ) Panel 1

On 22 September 2023

, Appellant submitted a Motion to Withdraw from

Appellant Review and Motion to Attach. Specifically, Appellant moved to attach a DD Form 2330, Waiver/Withdrawal of Appellate Rights in General

and Special Courts

- Martial Subject to Review by a Court of Criminal Appeals

, signed by Appellant on 20 September 2023 and Appellant’s counsel on 22

September 2023.

The Government did not submit any opposition.

Accordingly, it is by the court on this 28 th day of September , 202 3

,

ORDERED:

Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Motion to Attach are GRANTED. Appellant’s case is forwarded to the Appellate Records

Branch (JAJM) for further processing in accordance with Rules for Courts

Martial 1115(f)(3) and 1201, Manual for C ourts

- Martial, United States (2019

ed.).

FOR THE COURT

FLEMING E. KEEFE, Capt, USAF

Deputy Clerk of the Court
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.31 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
|Section 2: EX-31.1
|------------------



Exhibit 31.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



I, Michael T. Moe, certify that:



1. I have reviewed
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GSV Capital Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant’s
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this
report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant’s
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting.



Dated this 8th day of August
2012.



|By: |  | /s/Michael T. Moe                             
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|    |  | Michael T. Moe
        Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TELLY ALEXANDER HEATH,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

GREG JONES; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

JOAN BARTON,

Defendant. No. 15

- 35211

D.C. No. 2:13

- cv

- 01875

- MA

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Malcolm F. Marsh, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 14, 2016 **

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Telly Alexander Heath, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 23 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 35211

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Eighth

Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo, Toguchi v. Chu ng , 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004) , and we

affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Heath failed

to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were

deliberately indifferent to his serious mental heal th needs by housing him in the

Disciplinary Segregation Unit, Intensive Management Unit, or Behavioral Health

Unit. See Toguchi , 391 F.3d at 1057

- 60 (a prison official is deliberately

indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to an

inmate’s health). Further, Heath failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact

as to whether his placement in these units denied him the “minimal civilized

measure of life’s necessities.” Rhodes v. Chapman , 452 U.S. 337, 347 (1981).

Heath’s m otion for appel lees’ default is denied.

AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Rhea E. Campbell, as Administratrix of the Estate of Donald G. Campbell, Deceased, Appellant, v McMillan Book Company, Inc., Respondent. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from an amended decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 31, 1990, which adhered to its prior *872decision ruling that the discharge of claimant’s decedent was not in retaliation for having filed a compensation claim.

In our view, claimant failed to meet her burden of proving that decedent’s discharge was in retaliation for his saying that he intended to file a disability claim *(see, Matter of Solomon v Cohn, Glickstein, Lurie, Ostrin & Lubell,*97 AD2d 561). The record supports the conclusion by the Workers’ Compensation Board that decedent was discharged for a valid business purpose because he failed to timely file a form required by the employer justifying his absence even after he was notified that it was overdue, told that he would be discharged if he failed to file the form and given a five-day extension to file the form. Under the circumstances, the determination that decedent’s employment was not terminated in retaliation for the filing of a claim for disability benefits is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld *(see, Matter of Durivage v Diamond Intl. Corp.,*134 AD2d 649). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Amended decision affirmed, without costs. Weiss, J. P., Yesawich, Jr., Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.