alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidus Investment Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward H. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Shelby E. Sherard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                                             
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ EDWARD H. ROSS                          
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Edward H. Ross                              
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer        
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                  |  |  | 
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ SHELBY E. SHERARD                       
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Shelby E. Sherard                           
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

      ( print page 45149)    

# TIME AND DATE:

Thursday, September 13, 2018, at 1:00 p.m.

# PLACE:

Washington, DC

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

## Thursday, September 13, 2018, at 1:00 p.m.

1. Strategic Issues.

2. Financial Matters.

3. Executive Session—Discussion of prior agenda items and Temporary Emergency Committee governance.

*General Counsel Certification:*                     The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting may be closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Michael J. Elston, Acting Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.  

Michael J. Elston,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-19371 Filed 8-31-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### M is s i o n P l ann i ng / P r e

- F l i g h t B ri e f i n g C h e c k l is t:

R ev i e w with A ll P ar t i ci p a n t s A s P art o f P r e

- F li gh t Br i e f i n g

1. C h ain o f co mma nd

, i ndi v i du al r o l e s a n d r e s p o ns i b ilit i e s are i d e n tif i e d to all p arti c i p a n t s ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

2. P r o j e c t F li gh t S a f e ty P lan r e v i e w ed ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

3. H as t h e e m e r gen c y e va c u a t i o n r o u te b e e n d i s cu ss e d ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

4. A re all co m p o nen t s in pl a c e a n d o pe rati o n a l to tra c k t h e U A S a t all tim es ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

5. Can t e rrai n

, al t it u d e , t e m p e r a t u re o r w e at he r t h at co u ld h ave an a d v e r s e e ff e c t b e miti g a t ed ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

6. A re all a e r ial h a z a r d s i d e n tif i e d a n d k n ow n to all p arti c i p a n t s ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

7. H ave g r o un d o pe rati on s h a z a r d s a n d s af e ty b e e n i d e n tif i e d to all p arti c i p a n t s ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

8. H ave miti g ati n g m e a su r e s b e e n tak e n to av o id co n fli c ts w ith military o r c ivilian air c raft? 

## Ye s N o N/A

9. H ave a dequ ate la n d i n g a r e as bee n i d e n tifi e d a n d o r im p r o v e d to mi ni m u m s ta n d ar d s ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

10. A re all e ss e n tial U A S pe r s onn e l qu a l ifi e d f o r t h e mi s s i o n ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

11. A re t h e re e n o ug h (q u alif i ed ) ess e n tial pe r s on ne l to a cco m pl i s h t h e fl i gh t s af e ly? 

## Ye s N o N/A

12. Is t h e p i l o t c ar de d a n d e xp e r i en c e d f o r t h e mi s s i o n to b e co n d u c t ed ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

13. W ill b ri e f i ng s b e co n d u c t e d p ri o r to fli gh t w ith all p arti c i p a n t s ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

14. Is t h e air c raft c a p a b le o f pe r f o rmi n g t h e f l i gh t s af el y? 

## Ye s N o N/A

15. D o e s t h e U A S h ave t h e c a p a bi lity to p e rf o rm t h e fli g h t b a se d o n p r ed i c t e d w e at h er

co ndi ti o ns ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

16. Is t h e U A S d oc u m e n tati o n r e a d ily a cc ess i b le at t h e G r ou n d S t ati o n ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

17. Do all pe r s o n n e l h ave t h e re qui r e d PPE ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

18. R e m e m be r; ma p s o f ar e a s / s i t es

, h a n dh e ld ra d i o s

, c e ll ph on es

. 

## Ye s N o N/A

19. H ave t h e p r o pe r a pp r o vals b ee n g iv e n b y F A A ? 

## Ye s N o N/A

20. In flyi n g o v e r p r ivat e / p ub l ic la nds

, h as n o tifi c ati o n a n d pe rm is s i o n b e e n o b ta i ne d fr o m t h e

co n tr o lli n g a u t h o rity p ri o r to la unc hin g U AS? 

## Ye s N o N/A

23. O t he r? ( i de n tify) 

## Ye s N o N/A

24. O t he r? ( i de n tify) 

## Ye s N o N/A

25. O t he r? ( i de n tify) 

## Ye s N o N/A

I den tify C on di ti o n s ( if a n y)

P IC S i gn at u r e : Dat e : G S O pe rat o r/ O b s e rv e r S i g n at u r e : Dat e :
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2011 (the Report) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, MICHAEL S. GROSS, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|      |  |                        
|----- |  | -----------------------
|      |  | /S/    MICHAEL S.
GROSS
|Name: |  | Michael S. Gross       
|Date: |  | November 1, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                     LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

         R.J. Tower Corporation (a Michigan corporation)

         R.J. Tower Corporation (an Indiana corporation)

         R.J. Tower Corporation (a Kentucky corporation)

         Edgewood Manufacturing Corp. (a Delaware corporation)

         Kalamazoo Stamping and Die Company (a Michigan corporation)

         Trylon Corporation (a Michigan corporation)

         Tower Automotive Delaware, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)

         Tower Automotive Products Company, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)

         Tower Automotive Export, Inc. (a Barbados, West Indies corporation)

         Tower Automotive Limited (a United Kingdom corporation)

         Changchun Tower Gold Ring Automotive Products Company, Ltd. (a China 
         corporation)

         Tower Automotive Canada, Inc. (a Canada corporation)

         Tower Automotive do Brasil Ltda (a Brazil corporation)

         Tower Automotive Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (a Mexico corporation)

         Tower do Brasil Ltda (a Brazil corporation)

         Tower Italia, S.r.L. (an Italy corporation)

         Tower Automotive, S.r.L. (an Italy corporation)

         Tower Automotive Services and Technology, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)

         Oslamt, S.p.A. (an Italy corporation)

         Tower Automotive International, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Paul Brannelly, Senior Vice President, Finance & Administration of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

(1)                                 the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/   PAUL BRANNELLY                                         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                         |
|   | Paul   Brannelly                                             |
|   | *Senior   Vice President, Finance & Administration* |

 

Date: December 20, 2013

 

----
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 914 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit direct payment 

to pharmacies for certain compounded drugs that are prepared by the 

pharmacies for a specific beneficiary for use through an implanted infusion pump. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2013 

Mr. COCHRAN (for himself and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit 

direct payment to pharmacies for certain compounded 

drugs that are prepared by the pharmacies for a specific 

beneficiary for use through an implanted infusion pump. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 914 IS

1 SECTION 1. MEDICARE DIRECT PAYMENT TO PHARMACIES 

2 FOR CERTAIN COMPOUNDED DRUGS THAT 

3 ARE PREPARED BY THE PHARMACIES FOR A 

4 SPECIFIC BENEFICIARY FOR USE THROUGH 

5 AN IMPLANTED INFUSION PUMP. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section 

7 1842(b)(6) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 1395u(b)(6)) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ before ‘‘(H)’’; and 

10 (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 

11 following: ‘‘, and (I) in the case of covered com12 pounded drugs that are prepared by a pharmacy for 

13 a specific individual, are dispensed, directly or indi14 rectly, to the individual, are necessary for the effec15 tive use of, or therapeutic benefit from, an im16 planted infusion pump (regardless who refills the 

17 pump), and are billed directly by the pharmacy, pay18 ment shall be made to the pharmacy’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 subsection (a) shall apply to drugs dispensed on or after 

21 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned, Jason K. Wadzinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jason K. Wadzinski 
|                      |  |     |  | Jason K. Wadzinski     
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Toggle Navigation
        Toggle Search
        
        Defense Information Systems Agency
        Please enter only alphanumeric characters
                
                Facebook
                    Twitter
                    Youtube
                    LinkedIn About Toggle Submenu
			  Our Work / DISA 101
				  Our Leaders
				  Our Strategic Plan
				  Our History
				  DISA Policy/Issuances
				  Fact Sheets
				  Industry Partners
				  Contact Us
			News and Events Toggle Submenu
			  News
				  Events
				  Training
				  Media Resources
			Services and Capabilities News & Events
        
        
          
            2023
 Print
                    Share
 News
        
                Events
            
                Training
            
                Media Resources
 "This record-breaking participation continues to show just how strong our partnership is," Skinner said referencing the record turnout of registered participants. "Our force cannot be as successful, as agile or as maneuverable without [industry and mission partners] helping us simplify our environment."
 
 
 
 
 Learn More  Follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebookto learn more about how DISA is strengthening the nation and warfighter communications. Subscribe to receive the latest DISA news.  DISA: Trusted to Connect, Protect and Serve Learn more
 Our Work
    Our Leaders
    Our Organization Structure
    Our History
    Small Business Programs
    Issuances/Policy
    **News & Events**
    News
    Events
    Training
    Media Resources
                        **Careers at DISA**
    Employment Opportunities
    Learning and Development
    New Employees
    New Military Employees
    Quality of Work Life
    Recruiting Events
    SDC Recruitment
    Search for Opportunities
    WHCA Recruitment
                        ****Legal & Regulatory****
    Accessibility Notice
    Data Rights/Intellectual Property
    FOIA
    Inspector General
    Inventories & Schedules
    Linking Policy
    No Fear Act
    Privacy Impact Assessments
    Privacy Office
    Security/Privacy
    Whistleblower
            **Defense Information Systems Agency**
                        
                        Contact Us
                    Subscribe to DISA email updates:
                        Email
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stacy Lewis, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.), rendered September 23, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The *776appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Hellenbrand, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, his confession was properly ruled admissible as there was no illegality in the procedures employed by police to effectuate his arrest. The police clearly had probable cause to arrest based upon the identification provided by the complainant who knew the defendant from prior business dealings and who identified the defendant’s photograph, thus confirming his identification *(see, People v Mitchell,*170 AD2d 542). Indeed, it is well settled that information provided by an identified citizen accusing another identified individual of committing a specified crime provides the police with probable cause to arrest *(see, People v Banks,*151 AD2d 491; *see also, People v Williams,*159 AD2d 743; *People v Brown,*146 AD2d 793).

Thereafter, possessing the requisite probable cause, the police acted upon information that the defendant could be found inside a specific hotel room *(see, People v Crews,*162 AD2d 462). Upon knocking on this hotel room door, the defendant exited his room and stepped out into the hall. There, he had no reasonable expectation of privacy and hence, a valid warrantless arrest was effectuated *(see, People v Minley,*68 NY2d 952; *People v Marzan,*161 AD2d 416; *People v Proctor,*151 AD2d 788; *People v Anderson,*146 AD2d 638; *People v Brown,*144 AD2d 975). The resulting confession was thus not the product of an illegal arrest.

Nor was the defendant’s confession subject to suppression as having been involuntarily obtained. The record demonstrates that after his arrest, the defendant was twice advised of his constitutional rights, which he waived. He voluntarily spoke with detectives and an Assistant District Attorney during periods of interrogation conducted during a span of approximately 10 hours. At no time did he request the assistance of counsel, nor did he request that the questioning cease. Accordingly, the court correctly determined that the videotaped confession was properly admissible *(see, People v Stackhouse,*160 AD2d 822; *People v Ates,*157 AD2d 786).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Eiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
#### Michael Henry SCHRECONGOST, Petitioner, v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Respondent.

No. 90SC360.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

May 6, 1991.

Law Office of Stanley H. Marks & Richard A. Hostetler, Richard A. Hostetler, Denver, for petitioner.

Gale A. Norton, Atty. Gen., Raymond T. Slaughter, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Timothy M. Tymkovich, Sol. Gen., John J. Krause, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for respondent.

Justice ERICKSON

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

We granted certiorari to review *People v. Schrecongost,*796 P.2d 45 (Colo.App.1990). In *Schrecongost,*the court of appeals held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by sentencing the defendant to consecutive sentences for second-degree kidnapping involving sexual assault,1 and first-degree sexual assault.2

After Schrecongost filed his appeal, but before the court rendered its decision, another division of the court of appeals announced *People v. Henderson,*794 P.2d 1050 (Colo.App.1990), which held that the crime of sexual assault merged into second-degree kidnapping involving sexual assault. The court of appeals, based on *Henderson,*denied Schrecongost’s motion to filed supplemental briefs regarding the merger doctrine and consecutive sentences based on *Henderson.*We granted certiorari in both this case and *Henderson*to review whether the doctrine of merger barred convictions and cumulative sentences for sexual assault and second-degree kidnapping involving sexual assault.

In *People v. Henderson,*810 P.2d 1058 (Colo.1991), we reversed the court of appeals and held that sexual assault is not a lesser included offense of second-degree kidnapping, and therefore that the doctrine of judicial merger did not bar convictions and cumulative sentences for both offenses. *Henderson*controls the resolution of the issue in this case.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

QUINN, J., dissents, and LOHR and KIRSHBAUM, JJ., join in the dissent.

1

. § 18 — 3—302(3)(a), 8B C.R.S. (1986).

2

. § 18-3-402, 8B C.R.S. (1986).

Justice QUINN

dissents.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in *People v. Henderson,*810 P.2d 1058, decided today, I dissent from this *1069court’s affirmance of the judgment of the court of appeals.

I am authorized to say that Justice LOHR and Justice KIRSHBAUM join in this dissent.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018 (the "Report") of Garrison Capital Inc. (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Tansey, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Joseph Tansey       |
|-------------------------|
| Joseph Tansey           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| May 8, 2018             |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v April Davis, Also Known as Jacqueline Cooper, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Roberts, J.), rendered on October 13, 1987, convicting defendant upon a plea of guilty of burglary in the third degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of one to three years, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with her plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of [her] bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



SEEC, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-104358) and Form S-8 (No.'s 333-39667,
333-39663, 333-62149 and 333-54366) of SEEC, Inc. of our report dated May 14,
2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this
Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2.


Boston, MA

September 17, 2003