alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 936 

To increase oversight of small business assistance programs provided by 

the Small Business Administration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2013 

Mr. HELLER (for himself, Mr. ENZI, and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To increase oversight of small business assistance programs 

provided by the Small Business Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transparency in Small 

5 Business Assistance Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OVERSIGHT OF SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE PRO7 GRAMS. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 936 IS

1 (1) the terms ‘‘Administration’’ and ‘‘Adminis2 trator’’ mean the Small Business Administration 

3 and the Administrator thereof, respectively; and 

4 (2) the term ‘‘small business concern’’ has the 

5 same meaning as in section 3 of the Small Business 

6 Act (15 U.S.C. 632). 

7 (b) OVERSIGHT OF SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE

8 PROGRAMS.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall col10 lect information from small business concerns that 

11 receive assistance provided by the Administration, 

12 including a loan, a loan guarantee, a grant, or coun13 seling services. 

14 (2) INFORMATION TO BE COLLECTED.—The in15 formation collected under paragraph (1) shall in16 clude— 

17 (A) the operational status of each small 

18 business concern, to be collected 6 months after 

19 and 1 year after the date on which the small 

20 business concern receives assistance from the 

21 Administration; 

22 (B) if a small business concern is no 

23 longer operational, the reason for the closure of 

24 the small business concern; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 936 IS

1 (C) the number of part-time employees and 

2 full-time employees that each small business 

3 concern employs, to be collected— 

4 (i) 6 months after the date on which 

5 the small business concern receives assist6 ance from the Administration, and every 6 

7 months thereafter, during the time the 

8 small business concern is receiving assist9 ance from the Administration; and 

10 (ii) 6 months after and 1 year after 

11 the date on which the small business con12 cern ceases to receive assistance from the 

13 Administration; and 

14 (D) if the Administration is unable to pro15 vide assistance to the small business concern, 

16 the number of referrals that the Administration 

17 makes to another assistance program within the 

18 Administration or to another Federal agency. 

19 (3) REPORT.—The Administration shall include 

20 the information collected under this subsection in 

21 the annual report required under section 10(a) of 

22 the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 639(a)). 

23 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect 1 

24 year after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 614 

To require the continuation of tuition assistance programs for members of 

the Armed Forces for the remainder of fiscal year 2013. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 19, 2013 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. MORAN, Mrs. HAGAN, Mr. COONS, 

Ms. HIRONO, Mr. MURPHY, Ms. COLLINS, Ms. MURKOWSKI, and Mr. 

ROBERTS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the continuation of tuition assistance programs 

for members of the Armed Forces for the remainder 

of fiscal year 2013. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR CONTINUATION OF AU4 THORIZED TUITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS 

5 FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES FOR 

6 REMAINDER OF FISCAL YEAR 2013. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries of the military 

8 departments shall carry out tuition assistance programs 

9 for members of the Armed Forces during the remainder 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 614 IS

1 of fiscal year 2013 using amounts specified in subsection 

2 (b). 

3 (b) AMOUNTS.—The minimum amount used by the 

4 Secretary of a military department for tuition assistance 

5 for members of an Armed Force under the jurisdiction of 

6 that Secretary pursuant to subsection (a) shall be not less 

7 than— 

8 (1) the amount appropriated or otherwise made 

9 available by the Consolidated and Further Con10 tinuing Appropriations Act, 2013 for tuition assist11 ance programs for members of that Armed Force, 

12 minus 

13 (2) an amount that is not more than the per14 centage of the reduction required to the Operation 

15 and Maintenance account for that Armed Force for 

16 fiscal year 2013 by the budget sequester required by 

17 section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emer18 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
AIRRECK WHITE

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1835

__________ ___________________/

Opinion filed July 7, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Wakulla County

. Dawn Caloca

- Johnson , Judge

.

Airreck White, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahas s ee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caldera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Benjamin Warner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 /s/ Benjamin WarnerBenjamin Warner

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 August 10, 2012
From: Bart Brashers <bbrashers@environcorp.com>

Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 3:42 PM

To: Krivo, Stan

Cc: Shepherd, Lorinda; Jill Webster (Jill_Webster@fws.gov); Michael Carbon

Subject: Statoil: More information requested on VISIBILTY modeling

Attachments: Otto_Candies-Peyton.pdf

Stan,

In response to your phone call today, here’s more information on the Statoil modeling. This is “for the 

record”.

24-hour VISIBILITY modeling:

The VOLUME sources were based on ship dimensions. In the CALPUFF input files, you can find (for each 

of the sources VOL01 through VOL100):

Effective height = 3.66 m

Base Elevation = 0 m

Initial Sigma Y = 4.26 m

Initial Sigma Z = 1.70 m

The file Otto_Candies_Peyton.pdf (enclosed) shows the beam (listed as “Beam Molded”) is 18.3 m, and 

the height (listed as “Depth Molded”) is 7.32 m.

The effective height is half the physical height: 7.32 / 2 = 3.66 m.

The base elevation is sea level.

The initial Sigma Y is the physical width divided by 4.3: 18.3 / 4.3 = 4.29 m (note the conservative typo).

The initial Sigma Z is the physical height divided by 4.3: 7.32 / 4.3 = 1.70 m.

This follows the guidance from the ISCST3 user manual, which is also referenced in the AERMOD 

manual. It’s also very similar to the recommendations of the Haul Roads Working Group.

Note: because Sigma Z used the physical height divided by 4.3 (not divided by 2.15; i.e. the full plume, 

not the half plume) the center of the plume is at half the physical height, which is why the effective 

height parameter is the physical height divided by 2.

The emission rate for each VOLUME source is simply the summed maximum short-term (hourly) 

emission rate divided by the number of volume sources used, i.e. 100. The summed maximum shortterm emission rate is just the sum of the emission rates of two OSVs and the two Crewboats.

Please let me know if the above answers your questions about the VISIBILITY modeling I sent to Jill 

Webster (FWS).

I will send you a separate email about the Annual Modeling shortly.

Bart
Bart Brashers | Atmospheric Scientist

Senior Manager, ENVIRON International Corporation

19020 33rd Ave W Ste 310 | Lynnwood WA 98036

T: +1 425-412-1812 | F: +1 425-412-1840 | M: +1 206-550-2606

bbrashers@environcorp.com

This message contains information that may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected by 

law from disclosure. It is intended for the exclusive use of the Addressee(s). Unless you are the 

addressee or authorized agent of the addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclose 

to anyone the message or any information contained within. If you have received this message in 

error, please contact the sender by electronic reply to email@environcorp.com and immediately 

delete all copies of the message.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 38650

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

BALTAZAR HUMBERTO OLIVAS

PEREZ ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2011 Unpublished Opinion No. 734

Filed: December 7, 2011

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fift h Judicial District, State of Idaho, Jerome County. Hon. John K. Butler , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and concurrent unified sentence s of fifteen years, with minimum period s of confinement of five years , for two counts of trafficking in methamphetamine

, affirmed

.
Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Baltazar Humberto Olivas

- Perez pled guilty to two counts of trafficking in
methamphetamine . I.C. § 37

- 2732B . In exchange for his guilty plea s , an additional charge was

dismissed. The district court sente nced Olivas

- Perez to concurrent unified terms of fifteen years,
with minimum periods of confinement of five years. Olivas

- Perez filed an I.C.R. 35 motion for
reduction of his sentence, which the district court denied. Olivas

- Perez appeals, challenging only

the excessiveness of his sentences.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court ’ s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of th e sentence are well established and2 need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Olivas

- Perez ’s judgment of conviction and sentence s are affirmed.
**Custom er Service Hotline: 1**  **- 800**  **- 438**  **- 2474**  **UNITED STA**

**TES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A**  **GENCY**

**REGION III 1650 A**  **rch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103**  **- 2029**  Shari T. Wilson, Secretary July 21, 2009 Maryland Department of the Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltim ore, MD 21230 Dear Secretary

Wilson: On June 30, 2009, EPA received a revision to the Maryland State I mplementation Plan (SI P) from the Maryland Department of the Environment (the Department) pertaining to the one sintering plant located at a steel mill in Maryland

– Revision #09 - 02. This SI P revision includes amendments to Regulation .03 under COMAR 26.11.10 Control of Iron and Steel Production In stallations. I n its June 30, 2009 transmittal letter, the Department indicated that it was withdrawing SI P Revision #07 - 01 sent to EPA on February 13, 2007 because Revision #09 - 02 supersedes and replaces #07 - 01 in its entirety . EPA has determined that SI P Revision #09 - 02, submitted on June 30, 2009, is administra tively and technically

complete. EPA is review ing it to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice (DFR). If members of y our staff have any questions, they

may direct them to Marcia Spink, Associate Director for Air Programs at (215) 814 - 2104 . She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Purs uant to y our request to withdraw it, we are returning the February 13, 2007 S IP Revision #07 - 01 to the Department and no longer consider it pending before EPA. Sincerely , Dian a Esher, Acting Director Air Protection Division e nclosures
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 950 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 950

   To amend the Controlled Substances Act to allow a veterinarian to 
  transport and dispense controlled substances in the usual course of 
        veterinary practice outside of the registered location.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2013

  Mr. Moran (for himself and Mr. King) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Controlled Substances Act to allow a veterinarian to 
  transport and dispense controlled substances in the usual course of 
        veterinary practice outside of the registered location.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterinary Medicine Mobility Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPORT AND DISPENSING OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES IN THE USUAL 
              COURSE OF VETERINARY PRACTICE.

    Section 302(e) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 822(e)) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(e)'' and inserting ``(e)(1)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a registrant who is a 
veterinarian shall not be required to have a separate registration in 
order to transport and dispense controlled substances in the usual 
course of veterinary practice at a site other than the registrant's 
registered principal place of business or professional practice, so 
long as the site of dispensing is located in a State where the 
veterinarian is licensed to practice veterinary medicine.''.
```
EXHIBIT 99


                            Supplementary Trust Data




l.  The total amount of cash distributed to
      Certificateholders in l996, per $l,000
      of Certificates.................................................$1,375.168


2.  The total amount of the distribution set
      forth in paragraph l which represents
      principal payments on the Certificates ................................$0


3.  The amount of outstanding balances in the
      Accounts which were 30 or more days
      delinquent as of the end of the
      December l996 Monthly Period .............................$413,199,875.05


4.  The total amount of the Monthly
      Servicing Fee paid to the Servicer
      by the Trust in l996.........................................$135,090,434
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 885 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.885

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  35 Park Street in Danville, Vermont, as the ``Thaddeus Stevens Post 
                                Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. THADDEUS STEVENS POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 35 Park Street in Danville, Vermont, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Thaddeus Stevens Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thaddeus 
Stevens Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
No. 03

- 15

- 00025 -CV

In The Court of Appeals f or the Third District Austin, Texas

A PPELLANTS /C ROSS -A PPELLEES L AKEWAY R EGIONAL M EDICAL C ENTER , LLC

AND S URGICAL D EVELOPMENT P ARTNERS , LLC,

v.

A PPELLEES L AKE T RAVIS T RANSITIONAL LTCH, B RENNAN , M ANNA & D IAMOND , LLC AND F RANK T. S OSSI ,

O N A PPEAL FROM THE 345 TH J UDICIAL D ISTRICT C OURT , T RAVIS C OUNTY , T EXAS C AUSE N O

. D-1- GN

- 12

- 000983 H ONORABLE L ORA J. L IVINGSTON , P RESIDING

APPELLANT SURGICAL D EVELOPM ENT PARTNERS, LLC.’S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ADDITIONAL COUNSEL

Please take notice that Jessica Z. Barger and Raffi Melkonian of W RIGHT &

C LOSE , LLP , One Riverway, Suite 2200, Houston, Texas 77056, (713) 57 2- 4321,

(713) 572

- 4320 (fax), are appearing as a dditional counsel for Appellant /Cross

Appellee Surgical Development Partners, LLC.

Respectfully submitted

,

/s/ Jessica Z. Barger Jessica Z. Barger State Bar No. 24032706 Raffi Melkonian State Bar No. 24090587 ACCEPTED 03-15-00025-CV 5994328 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/9/2015 11:40:53 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK2 W RIGHT & C LOSE , LLP One Riverway, Suite 2 200 Houston, TX 77056 Telephone: (713) 572

- 4321 Telecopier: (713) 572

- 4320 barger@wrightclose.com Melkonian@wrightclose.com Counsel for Appellant/Cross

- Appellee Surgical Development Partners, LLC3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 8th day of Ju ly 2015, the foregoing notice was

s erved by electronic service upon the following counsel of record:

Mr. S. Abraham Kuczaj III Via Email Only Ms. Paige A. Amstutz Mr. Steven J. Wingard Ms. Jane Webre S COTT , D OUGLASS & M C C ONNICO , LLP 303 Col orado, Suite 2400 Austin, TX 78701 akuczaj@scottdoug.com pamstutz@scottdoug.com swingard@scottdoug.com jwebre@scottdoug.com

Counsel for Appellee/Cross

- Appellant Lake Travis Transitional LTCH, LLC

Mr. Robert A. Bragalone Via Email Only Mr. B. Ryan Fellman G ORDON & R EES LLP 2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800 Dallas, TX 75201 rbragalone@gordonrees.com rfellman@gordonrees.com

Counsel for Appellees Brennan, Manna & Diamond, LLC and Frank T. Sossi

/s/ Jessica Z. Barger Jessica Z. Barger
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           12466
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         311,979
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           215,331
<LOANS>                                        186,055
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  742051
<DEPOSITS>                                     571,366
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,609
<LONG-TERM>                                     18,792
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           116
<OTHER-SE>                                      144168
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  742051
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,758
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                39394
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                52,152
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               26753
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               27419
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           24,733
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  70
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 17,931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7459
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        4537
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4537
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.44
<LOANS-NON>                                        827
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   994
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,024
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,024
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 
  Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 
  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John G. Robertson, President and Chief Executive Officer
  of Reg Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Amendment No. 1 to Form 20-F of Reg
  Technologies Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies
  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
  of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
  of Reg Technologies Inc.

|Richmond, BC, Canada                 
|-------------------------------------
|by: /s/ John G. Robertson            
|March 21, 2006                       
|John G. Robertson                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Reg Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Reg Technologies
  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
  request.

---