alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gilberto Rosado, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fisher, J.), rendered March 7, 1988, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We disagree with the defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the trial court’s allowing into evidence dated arrest photographs, and by the prosecutor’s comments thereon. During the cross-examination of four of the People’s witnesses, including a detective, defense counsel elicited that the detective had conducted a photographic identification with the other three witnesses. Defense counsel sought to imply that the witnesses had chosen the defendant’s picture because it showed him wearing a Chicago Bears T-shirt, despite the fact that the name Chicago Bears was obscured. To counter this suggestion of unfairness, the People, during redirect examination of the detective, were allowed to offer into evidence two overexposed arrest photographs of the *701defendant received from the police in Chicago, where he had fled after the offense. The prosecutor explained that this procedure was adopted to show the jury that the photograph which appeared in the array was the best of those received from Chicago and to rebut the charge of suggestiveness and unfairness.

The trial court properly ruled the arrest photographs admissible, notwithstanding the possibility of making the jury aware of the defendant’s arrest in Chicago on another charge prior to his arrest for the instant offense. By his cross-examination, suggesting that the police had deliberately used an unfair photographic array, the defendant opened the door to such a redirect examination by the People *(see, People v Brown,*62 AD2d 715, 723-724, *affd*48 NY2d 921).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
July 9 , 2015

Mr. R oberto Torres

MikkiMoves Real Estate

805 7 th Street

Eureka, CA 95501

Dear Mr. Torres :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your July 1 st 2015 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

-

2648 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief , the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safet y or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to p rocess your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption

.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Ana lyst

, Airmen and

Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
# Jornal Oficial C 222I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 222I |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 64.° ano11 de junho de 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 222I

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

64.° ano11 de junho de 2021

---

| Índice | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Comunicações |
| | COMUNICAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA |
| | Conselho |
| 2021/C 222 I/01 | Declaração da Comissão | 1 |

Índice

Página

II   Comunicações

COMUNICAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Conselho

2021/C 222 I/01

Declaração da Comissão

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

II Comunicações

COMUNICAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Conselho

| 11.6.2021 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CI 222/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2021

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CI 222/1

---

Declaração da Comissão

(2021/C 222 I/01)

A Comissão reconhece que um programa comum de reforço das capacidades e de formação em matéria de concessão de licenças e de execução é importante para um sistema eficaz de controlo das exportações da UE. A Comissão, em consulta com o Grupo de Coordenação da Dupla Utilização, compromete-se a analisar as eventuais implicações de um programa de reforço das capacidades e de formação em termos de recursos humanos e financeiros, a fim de identificar opções para a sua conceção, configuração e aplicação.

---
```

[Federal Register: October 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 206)]
[Proposed Rules]               
[Page 65585-65586]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26oc10-18]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0323; Airspace Docket No. 10-ANE-106]

 
Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Lancaster, NH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the NPRM published in the Federal 
Register on July 22, 2010 which proposed to establish Class E airspace 
at Weeks Medical Center Heliport, Lancaster, NH. The NPRM is being 
withdrawn as a portion of the proposed airspace already exists. A new 
rulemaking will be forthcoming to correctly establish the new airspace.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, October 26, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Horrocks, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On July 22, 2010, a NPRM was published in the Federal Register to 
establish Class E airspace at Lancaster, NH to accommodate special 
standard instrument approach procedures for Weeks Medical Center 
Heliport. (75 FR 42630) Docket No. FAA-2010-0323. After publication the 
FAA found that the airspace description in the proposed rule 
incorrectly included existing controlled airspace 1,200 feet above the 
surface. To avoid confusion, this proposed rule is being withdrawn and 
will be established under another rulemaking.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

The Withdrawal

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Notice 
of

[[Page 65586]]

Proposed Rulemaking, Airspace Docket No. 10-ANE-106, as published in 
the Federal Register on July 22, 2010 (75 FR 42630) (FR Doc. 2010-
0323), is hereby withdrawn.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on October 15, 2010.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2010-26943 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 178 (Thursday, September 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 46527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-335, OMB Control No. 3235-0381]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

Extension:
    Form 40-F

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Form 40-F (17 CFR 249.240f) is used by certain Canadian issuers to 
register a class of securities pursuant to Section 12(b) or (g) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') (15 U.S.C. 78l) or 
as an annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange 
Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)). The information required in the Form 
40-F is used by investors in making investment decisions with respect 
to the securities of such Canadian companies. We estimate that Form 40-
F takes approximately 429.93 hours per response and is filed by 
approximately 132 respondents. We estimate that 25% of the 429.93 hours 
per response (107.48 hours) is prepared by the issuer for a total 
reporting burden of 14,187 (107.48 hours per response x 132 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this 
information collection at the following website, www.reginfo.gov. 
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#15597c7b7166746c3b583b5477746170557a78773b707a653b727a63"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="733f1a1d1700120a5d3e5d3211120716331c1e115d161c035d141c05">[email protected]</span></a>; and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Candace 
Kenner, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fbaba9baa4b69a9297999483bb889e98d59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="257577647a68444c49474a5d655640460b424a53">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days 
of this notice.

    Dated: September 7, 2018.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-19879 Filed 9-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

Vesting of Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) 

As a modification of the terms of his prior award agreements, all Company stock options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) previously awarded to Jeffrey J.
O’Neill which have not yet vested as of February 24, 2014 shall not expire upon separation of employment from the Company and shall be deemed vested upon the expiration of the period in Section 8(d)(6) of his Separation Agreement. All
such stock options must be exercised within six (6) months of the Separation Date (February 24, 2014) and may be exercised on a cashless basis.
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: Garnett, Kim Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 11:55 AM To: Ogulei, David Subject: FW: Amry incinerators

From: John Cooper [mailto:jacooper@cooperenvironmental.c om] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:20 AM
To: Bivins, Dan Cc: Garnett, Kim Subject: RE: Amry incinerators

Dan, There were two units sold to the Army in Utah. One went to the production incinerator and one to the R&D incinerator. It is my understanding that the produ ction group used it for several years, but since it wasn’t required and perhaps told them things they didn’t want to know, it wasn’t written into the permit and they eventual ly stopped using it. I don’t know what the R&D group is currently d oing with their unit. If it is important, I could check with them and get back to you. John

From: Bivins, Dan [ mailto:Bivins.Dan@epa.gov ] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 6:45 AM To: John Cooper Cc: Garnett, Kim Subject: Amry incinerators

John- did you guys get any long term data from the Xact at the Army incinerators? Other than RATA test ing?

Dan

Dan Bivins U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Measurement Technology Group 919-541-5244
EX-10.06



Exhibit 10.06


 
 
 
 
	  	 February 12, 2016



 
 
 
 
 
 Mr. Andrew H. Tisch
 667 Madison Avenue
 New York, New York  10065
 
 

Dear Mr. Tisch:


 
 Reference is
made to your Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Loews Corporation (the "Company") dated February 12, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”).
 
 

This will confirm our agreement that the Employment Agreement is amended
as follows:
 
 
 1.  Term of Employment.  The period of your employment under and pursuant to the Employment
Agreement is hereby extended for an additional period through and including March 31, 2017 upon all the terms, conditions and provisions of the Employment Agreement, as hereby amended.
 


 2.  Compensation.  You shall be paid as basic compensation (the “Basic Compensation”) for your services to the Company and its subsidiaries under and pursuant to the
Employment Agreement a salary at the rate of Nine Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand ($975,000) Dollars per annum through March 31, 2017.  Basic Compensation shall be payable in accordance with the Company's customary payroll practices as in
effect from time to time, and shall be subject to such increases as the Board of Directors of the Company, in its sole discretion, may from time to time determine.
 
 

3.  
Incentive Compensation Plan.  In addition to receipt of Basic Compensation under the Employment Agreement, you shall participate in the Incentive Compensation Plan for
Executive Officers of the Company (the “Compensation Plan”) and shall be eligible to receive incentive compensation under the Compensation Plan as may be awarded in accordance with its terms.


 
 4.  Other Compensation.  The compensation provided pursuant to this Letter Agreement shall be exclusive of compensation and fees, if any, to which you may be entitled as an officer or
director of a subsidiary of the Company.
 
 
 Except as herein modified or amended, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
 
 
 

   

 
    

 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 

If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding, would you
please sign the enclosed duplicate copy of this Amendment at the place indicated below and return the same to us for our records.
 
 


 
 
	  	  	 Very truly yours,


	  	  	  
	  	  	 LOEWS CORPORATION


	
     
 	
     
 	  	  
	
     
 	
     
 	  	  
	
     
 	
     
 	 By:
 	 /s/  Gary W. Garson
 
	
     
 	
     
 	  	
      Gary W. Garson
 
	
     
 	
     
 	  	
      Senior Vice President
 
	      

	
     
 	  	
     
 
	 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:
 	
     
 	  	
     
 
	  	
     
 	  	
     
 
	 /s/ Andrew H. Tisch
 	
     
 	  	
     
 
	 Andrew H. Tisch
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**614 KA 11-01629**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TRUMAINE SUTTLES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT B. HALLBORG, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MATTHEW B. POWERS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Sheila A. DiTullio, J.), rendered July 26, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]). We reject defendant’s contention that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid. “[T]he record demonstrates that County Court engaged the defendant in an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice” ( People v Burt , 101 AD3d 1729, 1730, lv denied 20 NY3d 1060 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his contention that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe ( see People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256).

Entered: June 7, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          21,817
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,074
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,472
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,551
<PP&E>                                          28,754
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,003
<BONDS>                                         25,764
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        325
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,202
<SALES>                                         93,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               201,424
<CGS>                                           16,669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,280
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,828
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,740)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,586
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,326)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,326)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.31)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 812 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 812

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to take actions to implement 
   the Agreement between the United States of America and the United 
 Mexican States Concerning Transboundary Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in the 
                            Gulf of Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2013

  Mr. Wyden (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to take actions to implement 
   the Agreement between the United States of America and the United 
 Mexican States Concerning Transboundary Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in the 
                            Gulf of Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE 
              UNITED MEXICAN STATES CONCERNING TRANSBOUNDARY 
              HYDROCARBON RESERVOIRS IN THE GULF OF MEXICO.

    The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to take actions 
necessary to implement the terms of the Agreement between the United 
States of America and the United Mexican States Concerning 
Transboundary Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in the Gulf of Mexico, which is 
hereby approved, including--
            (1) to approve unitization agreements and related 
        arrangements for the exploration of, and development or 
        production of oil or gas from, transboundary reservoirs and 
        geological structures;
            (2) to disclose as necessary under the Agreement 
        information related to the exploration, development, and 
        production of a transboundary reservoir or geological structure 
        that may be considered confidential, privileged, or proprietary 
        information under law; and
            (3) to accept and take action not inconsistent with an 
        expert determination under the Agreement.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF****CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF****THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Wayne Middleton, ChiefExecutive Officer of Immobiliare Global Investments, Inc. (the"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2013 (the "Report")fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2) the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: August 19, 2013 | By:    | /s/ Wayne Middleton       |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Chief Executive Officer        |   |
|                  |   | (Principal Executive  Officer) |   |
|                  |   |                           |   |

 

 

I, Bradford Margetts, ChiefFinancial Officer, of Immobiliare Global Investments, Inc. (the"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2013 (the "Report")fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2) the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: August 19, 2013 | By:    | /s/ Bradford Margetts      |   |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer         |   |
|                  |   | (Principal Accounting  Officer) |   |
|                  |   |                            |   |