alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                               |                                    |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|        |                                                                                                                    | /s/ William              G. Miller |
|   | William                G. MillerChairman                of the Board and Co-Chief Executive                Officer |
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 6539 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NM

- 036

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$8 5 / h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Initial In spection 1 .0 $ 85.00 $ 

### 0 $ 85.00 

### 940 $ 79,900.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in c ompliance: 

### 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 79,900



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

On

- Condition Co sts:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 

### 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain wa rranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a si gnificant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements f or

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2013 (the Report) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|      |  |                         
|----- |  | ------------------------
|      | 
|      |  | /S/    RICHARD L.
PETEKA
|Name: |  | Richard L. Peteka       
|Date: |  | May 7, 2013
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 687 

To prohibit the closing of air traffic control towers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 9, 2013 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. ROBERTS, Ms. 

AYOTTE, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. KAINE, Mr. KIRK, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. UDALL of New 

Mexico, Mr. VITTER, Mr. WARNER, Mr. WICKER, Mr. FRANKEN, and Mr. 

NELSON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To prohibit the closing of air traffic control towers, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CLOSURE OF AIR TRAFFIC 

4 CONTROL TOWERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Ad7 ministration may not, during fiscal year 2013 or 2014, 

8 suspend or terminate the operation of any air traffic con9 trol tower in operation on March 1, 2013, without regard 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 687 IS

1 to whether the tower is operated by the Federal Aviation 

2 Administration or a contractor. 

3 (b) RESUMPTION OF OPERATION OF CLOSED TOW4 ERS.—If the Administrator suspended or terminated the 

5 operation of an air traffic control tower described in sub6 section (a) after March 1, 2013, and before the date of 

7 the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall provide 

8 for the resumption of the operation of that tower as soon 

9 as practicable after such date of enactment. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 50616 Su m m ar y Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. J E N N IF E R L Y N N O S E T , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 6 : 0 8 - CR- 2 7 - ALL B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , C L E M E N T an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es P E R C U R I A M: * T h e att orneyapp oi n t ed to represent J e n n i fer Ly n n O setha s m oved f or l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d er s v . Ca lif o rn ia , 3 8 6 U .S . 7 3 8 (1 9 6 7 ). O s e th a s file dare s p o n s e . T h e re c o r dis in s u ffic ie n tly deve l ope d t o a l l ow c ons i der at i on att hi s t i m e o f O se t ’ s c l ai m s of i nef fect ive as si st ance of

c ounse l ; s uch c l ai m s gener al l y “ c annotbe r es olved on di r ec tappeal w h en [th eyh a ve ] n ot be en raised be fore th e d i stri ct co u rt sin ce n o op p ortu n i ty ex i sted to de ve l op the reco rd on th e m erits of th e al l eg a ti on s. ” Uni t e d S t at e s v. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November

4, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 50616

2 Ca n tw ell , 4 70 F. 3d1 08 7, 1 09 1 ( 5t h Ci r. 2 006) (i nt e r nalq uo t at i o n m ar ks a nd c i t at i o n o m i t t e d) . Ouri nde pend en t revi e w o f t he r e c o r d, c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f, a nd O s e t ’ s r e s po ns e di s c l o s e s no no nf r ivo l o us i s s ue f

o ra ppe al . Ac c o r di ngly, t he m ot i on f

or l eave to w i t h draw i s G R A N T E D , coun seli s excused f rom f u rt h er r e s p o n s ib ilitie s h e r e in , a n dt h e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R . 42. 2. Os e t ’ s r e q u e s tf

o rt h e a p p o i n t me n to f n e w c o u n s e li s DE NI ED .
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 812 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 812

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to take actions to implement 
   the Agreement between the United States of America and the United 
 Mexican States Concerning Transboundary Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in the 
                            Gulf of Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE 
              UNITED MEXICAN STATES CONCERNING TRANSBOUNDARY 
              HYDROCARBON RESERVOIRS IN THE GULF OF MEXICO.

    The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to take actions 
necessary to implement the terms of the Agreement between the United 
States of America and the United Mexican States Concerning 
Transboundary Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in the Gulf of Mexico, which is 
hereby approved, including--
            (1) to approve unitization agreements and related 
        arrangements for the exploration of, and development or 
        production of oil or gas from, transboundary reservoirs and 
        geological structures;
            (2) to disclose as necessary under the Agreement 
        information related to the exploration, development, and 
        production of a transboundary reservoir or geological structure 
        that may be considered confidential, privileged, or proprietary 
        information under law; and
            (3) to accept and take action not inconsistent with an 
        expert determination under the Agreement.

            Passed the Senate October 12, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 812

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to take actions to implement 
   the Agreement between the United States of America and the United 
 Mexican States Concerning Transboundary Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in the 
                            Gulf of Mexico.
```
#### STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ROGERS, MAYES AND CRAIG COUNTIES, State of Oklahoma, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Steven J. ADAMS, Respondent.

No. 75411.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 12, 1990.

ORDER

Original jurisdiction is assumed.

Title 19 O.S.Supp.1989, § 215.9 requires the District Attorney to appoint a First Assistant and file such designation of office with the Secretary of State. After this requirement is met, and the designee has filed the oath as required by 51 O.S.1989 § 2, the statute allows the First Assistant District Attorney to perform the duties, required by law to be performed by the District Attorney, during the period of time between a resignation or death of the District Attorney and the appointment by the Governor of a qualified person to serve the balance of the District Attorney’s unexpired term.

We find that the First Assistant District Attorney became a de facto officer while he was exercising the functions of the District Attorney under color of authority pursuant to the statute. The acts of an officer de facto cannot be collaterally attacked. *Hatfield v. Jimerson,*365 P.2d 980, 982 (Okla.1961).

The question of the validity of the information is transferred to the Court of Criminal Appeals for its determination and decision regarding the effect of this holding by *423this Court in Cause No. CRF90-35, District Court of Rogers County, and styled *State of Oklahoma v. Ray Minnerup.*

OPALA, V.C.J., and HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS, DOOLIN, ALMA WILSON, KAUGER and SUMMERS, JJ., concur.

HARGRAVE, C.J., dissents.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 823 

To authorize the appropriation of $500,000,000 for fiscal year 2014 to 

provide grants to States for surface transportation projects of national 

and regional significance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2013 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To authorize the appropriation of $500,000,000 for fiscal 

year 2014 to provide grants to States for surface transportation projects of national and regional significance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROJECTS OF NATIONAL AND REGIONAL SIG4 NIFICANCE. 

5 Section 1301(m) of SAFETEA–LU (23 U.S.C. 101 

6 note) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2013’’ and in7 serting ‘‘each of the fiscal years 2013 and 2014’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Richard O. Armstrong, Respondent, v Peter Petsche, Doing Business as Peter’s Bar, et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Defendants are entitled to dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The Dram Shop Act does not create a cause of action in favor of one injured as a result of his own intoxicated condition *(Sheehy v Big Flats Community Day,*73 NY2d 629, 635; *Mitchell v The Shoals,*19 NY2d 338, 340-341). Further, there is no common-law liability on the part of a tavern owner for injuries sustained by a voluntarily intoxi*1080cated patron off the premises, outside the tavern owner’s control *(Sheehy v Big Flats Community Day, supra,*at 636-637; *Wellcome v Student Coop.,*125 AD2d 393). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Kings County, Garry, J.—Dismiss Complaint.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          19,218
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    326,178
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               406,925
<PP&E>                                       2,258,392
<DEPRECIATION>                                 182,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,665,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,552,739
<BONDS>                                         57,664
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,332
<OTHER-SE>                                     979,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,665,317
<SALES>                                      1,905,511
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,905,511
<CGS>                                        1,879,062
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,879,062
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               851,352
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,959
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,149,495)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,157,706)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,157,706)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION of CEO and CFO PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FS Energy and Power Fund (the “Company”) for the three months ended September 30, 2022, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), Michael C. Forman, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Edward T. Gallivan, Jr., as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:


• the Form 10-Q of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and


• the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November 10, 2022/s/ MICHAEL C. FORMANMichael C. FormanChief Executive Officer/s/ EDWARD T. GALLIVAN, JR.Edward T. Gallivan, Jr.  Chief Financial Officer
MBUAPCD

SIP Completeness Checklist 1 

### MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

RULE NUMBER: 205 DATE AMENDED: 3/21/01 REGULATION TITLE: Provision of Sampling and Testing Facilities

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

Attached/Not Attached*

X COMPLETE COPY OF THE RULE. If amended rule, indicat e changes in underline and strikeout format, compared to existin g approved SIP version.

X R EFERENCE TO OTHER RULES. If the rule contains a reference

t o any other rule, attach a

copy of that other rule unless it has already been submitted to EPA as a part of a previous SIP submittal.

X PU BLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE. Include a copy of the newspape r

clippin g certification with date of publication. Include a copy o f notice from each newspaper.

X RESOLUTION/MINUTE ORDER. Must include Board Cler k certification that hearing was held in accordance with information in t he public no tice; must also include list of rules adopted or amended, date of public hearing, and statement of compliance with H&S C Sections 40725-40728 [Administrative Procedures Act].

X P UBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONS ES: Any written comments

s ubmitted to the Distr

ict during pubic notice period or at the hearing;
a lso include an

y written responses prepared by the District as normal District procedure.MBUAPCD

SIP Completeness Checklist 2 OTHER INFORMATION

Attached/Not Attached

X MODELIN G SUPPORT. Provide as appropriate; not required fo r

VO C and NOx rules; required where rule is a relaxation in a n a ttainment area for SO2, PM10, CO, or N Ox [for NO2 purposes]; for
r elaxation or shift of emissions in nonattainment area for SO2, PM10, CO, and NOx, give reference to the approved SIP.

X E CONOMIC/TECHN ICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS

FRO M EPA POLICIES: As appropriate, describe specia l ci rcumstances, i.e., where alternative RACT is used, extende d compliance dates included, etc.**

X ADDIT IONAL MATERIALS: Any other supporting information ,

s uch as staff reports , which are include d with the rule package but not specifically required in the checklist above.

------------- * Attached separate sheet for each rule explaining why any materials are not included an d when they will be submitted to the ARB.

** Completed enforcement checklist will fulfill this requirement.

* - Pu blic Notice, Resolution, and Staff Report Containing Public Comments sent a s attachments to 4/9/01 letter to Harry Metzger.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of Agricultural Advisory Committee renewal.

# SUMMARY:

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) is publishing this notice to announce the renewal of the Agricultural Advisory Committee (AAC). The Commission has determined that the renewal of the AAC is necessary and in the public's interest, and the Commission has consulted with the General Services Administration's Committee Management Secretariat regarding the AAC's renewal.

      ( print page 45910)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Charlie Thornton, AAC Designated Federal Officer, at 202-418-5145 or                         *cthornton@cftc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The AAC's objectives and scope of activities are to assist the Commission in assessing issues affecting agricultural producers, processors, lenders and others interested in or affected by the agricultural commodity derivatives markets through public meetings, and Committee reports and recommendations. The AAC will operate for two years from the date of renewal unless the Commission directs that the AAC terminate on an earlier date. A copy of the AAC renewal charter has been filed with the Commission; the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry; the House Committee on Agriculture; the Library of Congress; and the General Services Administration's Committee Management Secretariat. A copy of the renewal charter will be posted on the Commission's website at                     *http://www.cftc.gov.*

Dated: September 6, 2018.

Robert Sidman,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2018-19673 Filed 9-10-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P