alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the
Annual Report of Potomac Bancshares, Inc. (the “company”) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert F. Baronner, Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the company.




/s/ Robert F.
      Baronner, Jr.Robert F. Baronner, Jr.President and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2010


102




---
Exhibit


Exhibit 4(c)











Home Office:  Cincinnati, Ohio
Administrative Office:  P.O. Box 5420, Cincinnati, Ohio 45201-5420




INHERITED CONTRACT ENDORSEMENT


The annuity contract is changed as set out below for use as an inherited contract.


Inherited Contract
This annuity contract is intended to be an inherited annuity contract.  It is established for the purpose of receiving funds from a deferred annuity contract that was owned by an individual who is now deceased (the “Decedent”).  The Decedent is identified with the name of the Owner of this annuity contract.


Decedent Information
We may require you to provide Due Proof of Death for the Decedent.  We may require you to provide such other information about the Decedent and the prior annuity contract as needed to administer this annuity contract.


Purchase Payments Limited
Any purchase payment for this annuity contract must be received as part of a tax-free exchange under IRC Section 1035.  It must be funds from an annuity contract that was owned by the Decedent.  It must be funds for which the Owner is the designated beneficiary under the terms of that contract.  The Decedent must have died before the annuity starting date of that contract.  The annuity starting date is the first day of the first period for which an annuity payment would have been made under that contract. 
No other purchase payments may be made to this contract.


Required Distributions
The entire interest in this annuity contract will be paid at least as rapidly as required by IRC Section 72(s) and the related regulations either:
		
	1)
	over your life or over a period certain not exceeding your life expectancy, with payments at least annually starting within one (1) year of the Decedent’s date of death or such later date as may be permitted by such regulations; or


2)in full within five (5) years of the Decedent’s date of death.













	
			
	E1091612NW




	-1-
	GALIC








Exhibit 4(c)
















This is part of your annuity contract.  It is not a separate contract.  It changes the annuity contract only as and to the extent stated.  In all cases of conflict with the other terms of the annuity contract, the provisions of this Endorsement shall control.


Signed for us at our office as of the date of issue.








	
			
	s/ Mark F. Muething
	 
	s/ John P. Gruber

	MARK F. MUETHING
	 
	JOHN P. GRUBER

	EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
	 
	SECRETARY







	
			
	E1091612NW




	-2-
	GALIC
#### Diane Samaritano, Appellant, v Salvatore Samaritano, Also Known as Toto Samaritano, Respondent.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Yachnin, J.), dated October 12, 1989, as, upon reargument, held that proceeds which the defendant husband might receive from a pending action to recover damages for personal injury were not marital property and could not be required to be held in escrow pending a future award of support and maintenance.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Any moneys which the husband might receive in settlement of his pending action to recover damages for personal injury constitute separate property *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [d] [2]; *Richmond v Richmond,*144 AD2d 549; *Rossi v Rossi,*137 AD2d 590). As such, the court properly declined to require that such funds be placed in escrow pending resolution of this matrimonial action. We further note that, as there is no order in effect mandating temporary maintenance or child support, to require the husband to hold these future sums in escrow would be improper. Mangano, P. J., Brown, Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
Thunderclap
Entertainment, Inc.

(A Development Stage Enterprise)



Exhibit 32.1



Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-oxley act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunderclap
Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (“Report”), I, Gary L. Blum, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:



1.			The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.			The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated: November 19, 2012 | /s/ Gary L. Blum                                      
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Gary L. Blum                                          
|                         | Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 August 28, 2006 Before Hon. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge Hon. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge Hon. Ann C. Williams, Circuit Judge
No. 05-4098 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee , v. CHARLES LAWSHEA, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. No. 05 CR 20001 Michael P. McCuskey, Chief Judge.

O R D E R The opinion of this court issued on August 24, 2006, is amended as follows: Page 5, last paragraph, line 4, the sentence beginning with the word “Such” should be changed to read, “Such flight gave Officer McCord reasonable suspicion to conduct a Terry search. When Lawshea failed to stop after Offi cer McCord twice directed him to do so, Officer McCord’s suspicions were further increased.” In addition, the district court case number cited in the caption should have read “05 CR 20001" not 05-20001.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1996 AND AS OF
MARCH 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000925661
<NAME> PLASMATRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 53
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,057
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       425
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,250)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   53
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (164)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (164)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (164)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF I.K. AND E.K.,

CHILDREN

,

Appellant, **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 2

- 00 0 55

- CV

Appeal from the

3 83 rd District C ourt

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2019DCM7783 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellant ’s Motion to Suspend Briefing Deadline. After

further consideration

, the motion is GRANTED. Therefore

, the Court ORDERS the Court Reporter

for the 383 rd District Court of El Paso County, Texas, to file the supplemental reporter’s record

with this Court on or before December 14, 2022. The Appellant is to make the necessary

arrangements with the Court Reporter to have the supplemental filed with the Court

. The

Appellant’s brief will be due fourteen days after the supplemental reporter’s record is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 9 th day of November , 20 2 2

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
----

**Exhibit        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                  William G. Miller William                  G. MillerChairman                  of the Board and Co-Chief Executive                  Officer |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

          - [F.C.S.C. Meeting and Hearing Notice No. 8-18]

      ( print page 45469)    
The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its regulations (45 CFR part 503.25) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of open meetings as follows:

Tuesday, September 18, 2018: 9:30 a.m.—Issuance of Proposed Decisions in claims against Iraq.

10:30 a.m.—Issuance of Proposed Decisions under the Guam World War II Loyalty Recognition Act, Title XVII, Public Law 114-328.

# Status:

Open.

All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 601 D Street NW, Suite 10300, Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: Patricia M. Hall, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 601 D Street NW, Suite 10300, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-6975.

Brian M. Simkin,

Chief Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2018-19550 Filed 9-5-18; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 4410-BA-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000925600
<NAME>                                         Goran Capital Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          107,827,000
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            105,917,000
<EQUITIES>                                     20,268,000
<MORTGAGE>                                     1,870,000
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  390,000
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 148,890,000
<CASH>                                         3,230,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             44,843,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         6,454,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 440,032,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                113,149,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            62,386,000
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    112,000,000
<COMMON>                                       19,132,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (91,800,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   440,032,000
<PREMIUMS>                                     145,532,000
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            12,171,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (5,970,000)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 14,239,000
<BENEFITS>                                     113,768,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    34,960,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           70,591,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (53,347,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,149,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (63,224,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (17,041,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (80,265,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (13.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (13.79)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 157,425,000
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            132,781,000
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (19,013,000)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             89,612,000
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               84,800,000
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                113,149,000
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        (19,013,000)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS**

**ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Embotelladora Andina S.A (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Miguel Ángel Peirano, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/MIGUEL   ÁNGEL PEIRANO |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Miguel   Ángel Peirano    |   |
| Chief   Executive Officer      |   |
| Embotelladora   Andina S.A.    |   |
| Dated:   April 30, 2012   |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
|   | EXHIBIT 32.1 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

|   | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| Solely for purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned, President and Principal Executive Officer of Louisiana FoodCompany (the “Company”), hereby certify that: |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: February 22, 2011. | LOUISIANA FOOD COMPANY |   |
|--------------------------|------------------------|--------|

| By: | /s/ DAVID LOFLIN |   |
|-----|------------------|--------|

|   | David Loflin, President (Principal Executive Officer) |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Louisiana Food Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Zimbra Page 1 of 1 

Zimbra rmaguire@norwoodma.gov 

OWD - Property Letter 

From: Barry Hammer <Barry.Hammer@faa.gov> 

Subject: OWD- Property Letter 

Thu, Apr 03, 2014 11:21 AM 

@) 1 attachment 

To : rmaguire@norwoodma.gov 

Cc: Thomas Vick <Thomas.Vick@faa.gov> 

Russ, 

FINALLY! The letter we spoke about almost a year ago finally revealed itself. It did not come from 

our office which is why I had a difficult time finding it. 

You'll see however, that we must have gotten our signals crossed . This was in regards to parcel of 

land just across the street from the property for which you submitted a release request. 

Hopefully, this clears up at least one open issue. I'll work with Tom Vick on the other. 

Regards, 

Barry J. Hammer, P.E. 

Program Manager 

Federal Aviation Administration 

12 New England Executive Park 

Burlington, MA 01803 

781.238.7625 

20121011_Robinson Letter to Town Manager.pdf 

lffil 318 KB 

https:/ /ncs.norwoodma. gov /hlprintmessage ?id=3 8 84 3 &tz= America/New_ York 4/3/2014
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2008

CHARLES S. BRILES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SANDY HENDERSON BRILES SURRATT; WACHOVIA BANK

AND TRUST COMPANY, N.A.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-95-624-2)

Submitted: September 17, 1996 Decided: November 15, 1996

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles S. Briles, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Forester Griffin,

Greensboro, North Carolina; Ellen M. Gregg, WOMBLE, CARLYLE,

SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting

Defendants' motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Briles v. Surratt, No. CA-95-624-2 (M.D.N.C. June

18, 1996). Appellant's motions for general relief, including his

requests to present additional points and to present argument

against Appellee Surratt's brief, are denied. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED