alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Monroe
Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2020, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Theodore L. Koenig, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and I, Aaron D. Peck, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: May 8, 2020 |                                                               
|----------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |                                                               
|                  | /s/ Theodore L. Koenig                                        
|                  | Theodore L. Koenig                                            
|                  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director                
|                  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                 
|                  | Monroe Capital Corporation                                    
|                  |                                                               
|                  | /s/ Aaron D. Peck                                             
|                  | Aaron D. Peck                                                 
|                  | Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Director
|                  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                  
|                  | Monroe Capital Corporation
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.28 MB)

Tags:DSCC, DLA Land & Maritime, DLA Land and Maritime Commander, columbus, EVENT, People and Culture, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### In the Matter of Leslie S., Appellant.

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeals are from (1) an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Schindler, J.), dated June 5, 1989, which, upon a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Capilli, J.), entered March 28, 1989, made pursuant to the appellant’s admission, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted petit larceny, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and put him on probation, and (2) an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Schindler, J.), dated January 9, 1990, which upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated November 14, 1989, which after a hearing, found that the appellant had violated the terms of his probation and placed him for a period of 12 months with the New York State Division for Youth. The appeal from the order of disposition dated June 5, 1989, brings up for review the fact-finding order entered March 28, 1989.

*755Ordered that the appeal from the order of disposition dated January 9, 1990, is dismissed as abandoned, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition dated June 5, 1989, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Since the appellant did not move to suppress any physical evidence seized by the police at the time of his arrest, his appellate claim that such evidence should have been suppressed has been waived *(see,*Family Ct Act § 330.2 [7]; *cf., Matter of George V.,*100 AD2d 594). Contrary to the appellant’s request, under the circumstances herein, we decline to hold that the probable cause hearing was, in fact, a suppression hearing *(see, Matter of Robert G.,*121 Misc 2d 680, 691-692; *see also, Matter of Oniel W.,*146 AD2d 633, 634; *People v Reed,*98 Misc 2d 488, 489-490; *People ex rel. Pierce v Thomas,*70 Misc 2d 629). Lawrence, J. P., Harwood, Rosenblatt and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transatlantic Acquisition Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 23, 2010





/s/ Joseph RozelleJoseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)











The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Board of Directors Meeting

Tuesday, June 6, 2023

This event is closed to the public

Information summaries for the below listed projects can be found on dfc.gov

Meeting Agenda

I. CHAIRMAN OPENS MEETING

II. AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

III. ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS

IV. PROJECT APPROVALS

a. Tetra4 Proprietary Ltd (Phase 2) – South Africa

b. Banco de América Central, S.A. – El Salvador

c. Solararomo S.A. – Ecuador

d. ENERGO-PRO a.s. – Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Georgia

V. UPDATES

Location: Meeting will be held in a hybrid virtual/in-person environment
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION

                                       OF

                         CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE

                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                          QUIKBIZ INTERNET GROUP, INC.


                       ----------------------------------

                       Pursuant to Section 78.0295 of the
                         Nevada General Corporation Law
                       ----------------------------------




        I, the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of Quikbiz
Internet Group, Inc. ("Corporation"), a corporation organized and existing under
the General Corporation Law of the State of Nevada, hereby certify:

         1.       The name of the Corporation is Quikbiz Internet Group, Inc.

         2. The date the Certificate of Amendment of the Articles of
Incorporation to be corrected was filed with the Office of the Secretary of
State of the State of Nevada was August 13, 1997.

         3. This Certificate of Correction is being filed to correct an error
that caused the omission of the Corporation's authorized preferred stock from
Article Fourth of the Articles of Incorporation.

         4. The provision of the Certificate of Amendment of the Articles of
Incorporation that added a new Article FOURTH is corrected to read as follows:

         "That the voting common stock authorized that may be issued is TWENTY-
FIVE MILLION (25,000,000) shares of stock with a nominal or par value of $.002
cents per share, and FIVE THOUSAND (5,000) shares of preferred stock with a
nominal or par value of $.0006 per share. The Board of Directors is expressly
granted authority to issue shares of the preferred stock, in one or more series,
and to fix for each such series such voting powers, full or limited, and such
designations, preferences, limitations or restrictions and other rights thereof
as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution adopted by the Board of
Directors providing for the issue of such shares.



<PAGE>



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate this
th day of November 1999, and affirms the statements contained herein are true
under penalty of perjury.

                                           QUIKBIZ INTERNET GROUP, INC.

                                            /s/ David Barwarsky
                                            By:________________________
                                                David Bawarsky
                                                Chief Executive Officer


                                        2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-18-043]

*Agency Holding the Meeting:*                     United States International Trade Commission.                

*Time and Date:*                     September 21, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.                

*Place:*                     Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.                

*Status:*                     Open to the public.                

*Matters to be Considered:*

1. Agendas for future meetings: None.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote on Inv. Nos. 701-TA-609 and 731-TA-1421 (Preliminary)(Steel Trailer Wheels from China). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations on September 24, 2018; views of the Commission are currently scheduled to be completed and filed on October 1, 2018.

                    5.                     *Outstanding action jackets:*                     None.                

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: September 7, 2018.

William Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-19861 Filed 9-7-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 947 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 947

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To ensure access to certain information for financial services industry 
                  regulators, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SAFE Act Confidentiality and 
Privilege Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION SHARED BETWEEN STATE AND FEDERAL 
              FINANCIAL SERVICES REGULATORS.

    Section 1512(a) of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 (12 
U.S.C. 5111(a)) is amended by inserting ``or financial services'' 
before ``industry''.

            Passed the Senate December 17, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 947

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To ensure access to certain information for financial services industry 
                  regulators, and for other purposes.
```
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL SUPPORT

DOCUMENT:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS:

ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR HEATING PRODUCTS

January 5, 2009

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20024

EE-2006-STD-0129 and EERE-2006-BT-STD-0129 COMMENT 32.2
This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc.

and

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

EE-2006-STD-0129 and EERE-2006-BT-STD-0129 COMMENT 32.2
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 4171** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v. WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER BUTLER , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville

. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. ( 4:13

- cr - 00051

- F

- 1 )

Submitted : November 25, 2014 Decided: December 19, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Richard Croutharmel, Raleigh, North Carolina , for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney , Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Shailika K. Shah, Assistant United States Attorneys , Raleigh, North Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions ar e not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Butler was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment and a lifetime of supervised release for transporting child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 2252(a)(1) (2012). On appeal, Butler con tends that the district court plainly erred in finding a sufficient factual basis to accept his guilty plea. We affirm. Because Butler did not challenge the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 proceedings in the district court, we review his challenge for plain error. United States v. Mastrapa , 509 F.3d 652, 657 (4th Cir. 2007). Under plain error review, Butler must demonstrate that an error (1) occurred, (2) was plain, and (3) affected his substantial rights. United States v. Henderson , 133 S. Ct. 1121, 1126 (2013)
. Even then, we will correct the error only if it “seriously af fects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id. (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted). Before entering judgment on a guilty plea, a district court must find a factual basis to support the plea. Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(3). The factual basis may be supported by anything in the record, including the presentence report
. United States v. Martin ez , 277 F.3d 517, 525 (4th Cir. 2002). A mere blanket admission of guilt, in response to a recitation of the elements of the charged offense, is , without more, not a3 sufficient factual basis to support a plea. See United
States v. Carr , 271 F.3d 172, 178

- 81 (4th Cir. 2001). We have reviewed the record and find no plain error. Assuming, without deciding, that Butler's admission at the Rule 11 hearing was insufficient by itself to support a guilty plea , the record as a whole , including the presentence report , provided ample factual basis for the plea. We affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6883

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES EDDIE PALMER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CR-93-90-N)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 25, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Eddie Palmer, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his

request for a copy of his sentencing transcript at government expense and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Palmer, No. CR-93-90-N (E.D. Va. Apr. 25,

1996; May 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
1

Filed 10/9/15 In re C .B. CA1/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

In re C.B. et al. , Person s Coming Under the

Juvenile Court Law.

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CHILDREN

AND FAMILY SERVICES BUREAU,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

S.L.,

Defendant and Appellant. A144296

(Contra Costa County

Super. Ct. No s . J1201410, J1300822)

Mother, S.L., appeals from orders terminating her parental rights with respect to

two children on the sole ground that the Contra Costa County Children and Family

Services Bureau (Bureau) failed to comply with the notice requirements of the Indian

Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 2 5 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq. (See Cal. Rules of Co urt, rule

5.481

. )

By letter brief received by this court on August 7, 2015, the Bureau concede d that

notice should have been sent to the appropriate tribes and the Bureau of Indian Affairs

after obtaining information from the parents and relatives. Th e Bureau propose d entry of

a conditional reversal of the order terminating parental rights and a limited remand for

compliance with the ICWA , after which the Bureau would file all the relevant documents

for the trial court’s review and redetermination of p roper notice ; if no tribe claims the2

children are Indian children, the judgment terminating parental rights would be

reinstated.

We provided appellant with the opportunity to respond to the Bureau’s proposed

conditional reversal. On August 26, 2015, we were advised by appellant that no response

to the Bureau’s proposed conditional reversal was forthcoming.

We will therefore reverse the order s terminating parental rights and remand the

matter for compliance with the ICWA as proposed by the Bureau

.

DIS POSITION

The orders terminating parental rights of mother S.L. are reversed and remanded

for compliance with the ICWA. If no tribe claims the children are Indian children, the

orders terminating parental rights will be reinstated.

NEEDHAM, J.

We concur.

JONES, P.J.

BRUINIERS, J.