alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10537]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition “Günther Förg: A Fragile Beauty,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Dallas Museum of Art, Dallas, Texas, from on or about October 21, 2018, until on or about January 27, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elliot Chiu, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of                           ( print page 46010)                        March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000.                

Marie Therese Porter Royce,

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-19716 Filed 9-10-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND AS OF
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000925660
<NAME> NANOTECH CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,252
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,238)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   70
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (565)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (565)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (565)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6324

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ARTHUR LEE WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. ( 3:99

- cr - 00312

- HEH

- 3; 3:19

- cv - 00073

- HEH )

Submitted : June 19, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Arthur Lee Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Arthur Lee Williams seeks to appeal the dis trict court’s order construing his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 (2012) and dismissing it as successive . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ) (2012). A certifi cate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reas onable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrat e both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and
that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions ar e adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
NUMBER 13-19-00114-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

JULIO CESAR RAMIREZ, Appellant,

v.

JAIME CRISTOBAL RAMIREZ, Appellee.

On appeal from the 445th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant’s third amended motion for extension 

of time to file the brief. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on September 4,

2019, and this Court previously granted appellant two extensions for the filing of 

appellant’s brief in this cause.

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant's third motion for 

extension of time to file the brief and the extensions previously granted in this cause, is 
2

of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellant's third motion for extension of time 

to file the brief should be granted with Order. The Court, however, looks with disfavor 

upon the delay caused by counsel's failure to have filed a brief in this matter. 

Appellant's third motion for extension of time to file the brief is hereby granted, and 

the Honorable Juan Angel Guerra, counsel for appellant, is hereby ORDERED to file the 

appellate brief with this Court on or before February 4, 2020. No further extensions will 

be granted in this matter absent exigent circumstances.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

29th day of January, 2020.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.0

                   ON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                  Exhibit 11.0
           Computation of Pro Forma Net (Loss ) Income Per Share (1)
                 (dollars in thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   December 31            December 31            December 31
                                                       1996                  1995                    1994
                                                       ----                   ----                   ----
<S>                                              <C>                    <C>                     <C>
Net  (Loss) Income                                 $      (15,861)        $        3,672          $       (4,099)
                                                 =================      ================        ================
Pro Forma Earnings Per Share
Weighted Average Common and
   Common Equivalent Shares
   Outstanding                                         10,853,814              9,086,764               3,858,608
Conversion of Preferred Stock                                 ---                    ---               2,805,247
Dilutive Effect of Common Equivalent
 Shares Issued Subsequent to May 23, 1994 (2)                 ---                    ---                 287,981
                                                  -----------------      ----------------        ----------------
                                                       10,853,814              9,086,764               6,951,836
                                                  =================      ================        ================
Pro Forma Net (Loss) Income Per Common
   and Common Equivalent Share                      $       (1.46)        $         0.40          $        (0.59)
                                                  =================      ================        ================
</TABLE>

(1)  Fully dilutive pro forma  net (loss) income per share has not been
separately presented, as the amounts would not be meaningful.

(2) Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
83, stock options issued at prices below the initial filing date of the
Company's Registration Statement for its initial public offering have been
included as outstanding for 1995 and 1994. The dilutive effect of the common
stock equivalents was computed in accordance with the treasury stock method.

                                      50
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

TERVAUGHN C. STURGIS

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 600, 2018

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 0304014538 ( N )

§

§

§

Submitted: December 21 , 2018

Decided: January 30 , 2019

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; VALIHURA , and TRAYNOR

, Justices.

ORDE R

A fter careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s

motion to affirm, and the record on appeal

, we conclude that the Superior Court’s

order , dated November 19, 2018

, adopting the Commissioner’s report and

recommendation s

, dated August 20 , 2018

, 1 and denying the appellant’s mo tion for

postconviction relief should be affirmed

. 2 The appellant has expressly waived all of

the claims he raised in the Superior Court , except for his claim that defects in his

indictment meant he was illegally sentenced under Superior Court Criminal Rule

35(a). As the Superior Court correctly recognized, the appellant’s challenges to his

1 State v. Sturgis , 2018 WL 4002245 (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 20, 2018).

2 State v. Sturgis , 2018 WL 6046759 ( Del. Super. Ct. Nov. 19, 2018).2

indictment are outside the limited scope of Rule 35(a). 3 The Superior Court did not

err in denying the appellant’s motion.

NOW, T HEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED

and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice

3 Sturgis , 2018 WL 6046759 , at * 4 (“Under Rule 35(a), the ‘narrow function’ is to correct illegal

sentences, ‘ not to re

- examine errors at the trial or other proceedings prior to the imposition of

sentence. ’ ”) (quoting Hill v. United States , 368 U.S. 424, 430 (1962)). See also Brittingham v.

State , 705 A.2d 577, 578 (Del. 1998).
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

July 31, 2017

 

Via EDGAR

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enduro Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|                                         |                                 |
|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| The Bank of New York   Mellon Trust Company, |                                 |
| N.A., Trustee for   Enduro Royalty Trust     |                                 |
|                                         |                                 |
| By:                                          | /s/ SARAH NEWELL                     |   |
| ** **                                   | **Sarah   Newell**                   | ** ** |
| * *                                     | *Vice   President and Trust Officer* | * * |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2017 of Wellness Center USA, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew J. Kandalepas, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  Date: February 27, 2018/s/ Andrew J. KandalepasName: Andrew J. KandalepasTitle: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
**Exhibit No. 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

  

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Experience Art and Design, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

(1) the Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Date:  May 22, 2016 | */s/ Matthew Dwyer*                                                   |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | Matthew Dwyer                                                         |
|                          | President and Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidus Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward H. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Shelby E. Sherard, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 
Date: November 1, 2018   
/s/ EDWARD H. ROSS
   Edward H. Ross   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)   
/s/ SHELBY E. SHERARD
   Shelby E. Sherard   Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)**
Exhibit 4.10




	
  

  	
  INCORPORATED
  UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN
  DEFINITIONS CUSIP 12542R 50 6 THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of CHS Inc.
  transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
  or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This
  certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and
  Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this
  certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of its duly authorized
  officers. Dated: EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: WELLS
  FARGO BANK, N.A. TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE B2- CHS
  Inc. AMERICAN FINANCIAL PRINTING INCORPORATED – MINNEAPOLIS FULLY PAID AND
  NONASSESSABLE CLASS B RESET RATE CUMULATIVE REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK,
  SERIES 2, NO PAR VALUE, OF 

  






 















	
  

  	
  CHS Inc. THE
  CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY SHAREHOLDER UPON REQUEST AND WITHOUT CHARGE A
  FULL STATEMENT OF THE DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, LIMITATIONS, AND RELATIVE
  RIGHTS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS OR SERIES AUTHORIZED TO BE ISSUED, SO FAR
  AS THEY HAVE BEEN DETERMINED, AND THE AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD TO DETERMINE THE
  RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF SUBSEQUENT CLASSES OR SHARES. The
  following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
  certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
  according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in common
  UTMA –  Custodian  (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT – as tenants by
  entireties under Uniform Transfer to Minors JT TEN – as joint tenants with
  right of survivorship Act  and not as
  tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though
  not in the above list. For value received 
  hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME
  AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE Shares of the capital stock
  represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute
  and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the
  within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.
  Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME
  AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT
  ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL
  GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER)
  WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM
  (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM
  (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE
  DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL
  SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE