alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                               Consent of KPMG LLP


<PAGE>   2

Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
The Sports Club Company, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-26421) on Form S-8 and the Registration Statement (No. 333-38459) on Form
S-3 of The Sports Club Company, Inc. of our report dated February 25, 2000,
relating to the balance sheets of The Sports Club Company, Inc. as of December
31, 1998 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, shareholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report
on Form 10-K of The Sports Club Company, Inc.


KPMG LLP



Los Angeles, California
March 28, 2000
AAM-11-212-E March 23, 2011

Exemption No. 9840A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0167

Ms. Cindy R. Kearns

Vice President Albatross Air, Inc. 380 Airport Circle Beaver, WV 25812

Dear Ms. Kearns:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9840. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 24, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Albatross Air, Inc. (Albatross Air), for an extension of Exemption No. 9840. That exemption from part 121, appendices I and J of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Albatross Air, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program. Please note that part 121, appendices I and J has been re-designated to part 120. On May 14, 2009, the FAA published the “Drug and Alcohol Testing Program” final rule in the Federal Register (74 FR 22649). A copy is enclosed for your information.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.2

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Albatross Air.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9840 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Albatross Air are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Albatross Air part 135 operation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9840 to April 30, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9840 remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9840.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
# Official Journal C 249/25 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 249 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6425 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 249

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6425 June 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 249/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 May 2021 to 31 May 2021(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 249/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 May 2021 to 31 May 2021(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-2 of SEEC, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 18, 2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and dates listed below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



          (3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



                                                 /s/ RICHARD J. GOLDBACH

                                          --------------------------------------

                                                   Richard J. Goldbach


                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer



Date: September 18, 2003
| 1. | The report of the Company for the nine month period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: February 12, 2013 | By:                                                    | /s/ Howard Kaplan |   |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
|                         | Howard Kaplan                                          |              |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer & Chief Accounting Officer |              |
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-K/A of Security Bank Corporation (the Company) for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), H. Averett Walker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James R. McLemore, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ H. Averett WalkerH. AVERETT WALKERChief Executive OfficerApril 12, 2004/s/ James R. McLemoreJAMES R. McLEMOREChief Financial and Accounting OfficerApril 12, 2004




This certification accompanies
this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Iterated Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 15, 1999, included in the
1998 Annual Report to Stockholders of Iterated Systems, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Iterated Systems,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the responsibility of Iterated
Systems, Inc.'s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits.  In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-68593) pertaining to the 1994 Amended and Restated Directors
Stock Option Plan and the 1994 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan of
Iterated Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 15, 1999 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Iterated Systems, Inc. incorporated herein
by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to
the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1998.

 


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 25, 1999
Exhibit 32.01    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Billet Finder, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the Period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeff Freiberger, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/Jeff Freiberger By: Jeff Freiberger Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: September 4, 2012  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
File Name: Triangular Results WTP Simulation.docx

Author: Robert Johnston, Clark University Created: 8/27/2009 Purpose: Results from the WTP Simulations used for nonuse benefits transfer.
Triangular Results (mean) wtp_migrant_mean

------------------------------------------------------------- Percentiles Smallest 1% .2404715 -.0704282 5% .3770771 .0940531 10% .4689781 .1097281 Obs 1000 25% .6172702 .1173618 Sum of Wgt. 1000

50% .7534991 Mean .7605085 Largest Std. Dev. .2344603 75% .8934093 1.520279 90% 1.045899 1.530465 Variance .0549716 95% 1.155654 1.550309 Skewness .3708819 99% 1.388833 2.150308 Kurtosis 4.538082
1 Cyhalofop

- butyl Focus Meeting

July 11, 2014

1 0 :00

- 11 :00 a m, Potomac Yards South

- 9 100

Attendees

From EPA

BEAD: Rafael Prieto, Derek Berwald, Bill Phillips, Monisha Kaul

EFED: Kristina Garber , Richard Shamblen, Jean Holmes, and Brian Anderson

HED: Jaime D’Agostino, Doug Dotson, Margarita Collantes, Christiana Swartz

PRD: Jolene Trujillo, Jill Bloom , Linda Arrington

From DowAgroSciences

Nneka Breaux , US Regulatory Manager

Rafael Herrera, Global Regulatory Manager

Rick Mann, Biology Technical Expert

AGENDA

Introductions

Review the following items:

1) Can Dow clarify the term “post

- flood?”

For example, in water

- seeded rice, is the “post

- flood” application the period after the

flood for seeding, or application period after permanent flood?

2) Clincher DR is referenced as a supplemental application product to Clincher GR (southern

states). Is Clincher DR a registered product?

3) Ratoon rice. How is clincher used in the ratoon rice production process?

4) How are buffer zones established?

Buffer distances fo r the same commodity vary among labels. In particular, for

endangered species, the RebelEX has a smaller distance for the Southern States than

California

5) Why can the granule formulations be only applied to “water

- seeded” rice?

It seems that the granule co uld be applied to “dry

- seeded” rice since the granule is

applied to flooded waters.

Discuss locations of use across the country

- These are of particular importance to focus our

endangered species assessment.

Discuss the spectrum of plants that are affect ed by the mechanism of action for this chemical.

Discuss DowAgroSciences plan for wild rice

Can DowAgroSciences provide a bibliography of studies for any data developed for Europe or

elsewhere?

Final Thoughts
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00611-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.G. IV, a Child

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-16418

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

Appellant’s motion for leave to file late notice of appeal is MOOT. Costs of the appeal are taxed 

against appellant.

SIGNED October 17, 2018.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 811 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 811

 To amend the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 to provide for the 
increased purchase of Kosher and Halal food and to modify the labeling 
of the commodities list under the emergency food assistance program to 
     enable Kosher and Halal food bank operators to identify which 
              commodities to obtain from local food banks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2013

Mrs. Gillibrand introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 to provide for the 
increased purchase of Kosher and Halal food and to modify the labeling 
of the commodities list under the emergency food assistance program to 
     enable Kosher and Halal food bank operators to identify which 
              commodities to obtain from local food banks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Halal and Kosher Food Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. PURCHASE OF HALAL AND KOSHER FOOD FOR EMERGENCY FOOD ASSISTANCE 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 202 of the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 (7 U.S.C. 
7502) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Kosher and Halal Food.--As soon as practicable after the date 
of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall finalize and 
implement a plan--
            ``(1) to increase the purchase of Kosher and Halal food 
        from food manufacturers with a Kosher or Halal certification to 
        carry out the program established under this Act if the Kosher 
        and Halal food purchased is cost neutral as compared to food 
        that is not from food manufacturers with a Kosher or Halal 
        certification; and
            ``(2) to modify the labeling of the commodities list used 
        to carry out the program in a manner that enables Kosher and 
        Halal food bank operators to identify which commodities to 
        obtain from local food banks.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.02








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum Smith Barney Global Balanced L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




















By:             /s/        Christian Angstadt





Name:                     Christian Angstadt


Title:                      Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC,


general partner of the registrant





Date:                      March 26, 2010
#### Polish American Immigration Relief Committee, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Relax et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), rendered February 6, 1990, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3016 (a), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the complaint reinstated.

Plaintiffs are a not-for-profit New York corporation and its executive vice president. Individual defendants are the publisher and editor of the magazine, Relax. By summons and complaint dated September 8, 1989, plaintiffs alleged that defendants published an article which defamed plaintiffs in the February 4, 1989 edition of Relax. A copy of the article as printed in the magazine, entirely in Polish, was attached to the complaint. No English translation of the article was provided.

Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for want of personal jurisdiction over the defendants pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) and for failure to comply with the specific pleading requirements set forth in CPLR 3016 (a). By order dated December 21, 1989, Supreme Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, without reaching the jurisdictional issue, based on plaintiffs’ alleged failure to identify the specific words complained of. We reverse.

CPLR 3016 (a) provides: "In an action for libel or slander, the particular words complained of shall be set forth in the complaint”. Attaching the entire article to the complaint can satisfy the specificity requirement where "the alleged libelous material can be easily located and the defendants are not prejudiced by annexation of the entire article” *(Pappalardo v Westchester Rockland Newspapers,*101 AD2d 830, *affd*64 NY2d 862). The article in issue on this appeal, as in *Pappalardo (supra),*contains "widespread and consistent” references to plaintiffs which a jury could find to be defamatory. Accordingly, annexation of the entire article to the complaint was sufficient to meet the particularity requirement of CPLR 3016 (a).

*375Defendants also urge that, because plaintiffs failed to append an English translation of the article to the complaint as required by CPLR 2101 (b), its dismissal was warranted. However, a translation of the article from Polish to English is annexed to plaintiffs’ affirmation in opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss. Including the translation in the opposing papers is not, as defendants characterize it, a "belated attempt” to amend the complaint. To the contrary, it may be regarded as an amendment as of right pursuant to CPLR 3025 (a) which provides, in pertinent part: "A party may amend his pleading once without leave of court * * * at any time before the period for responding to it expires”. A motion to dismiss a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) operates to extend the time in which to serve a pleading in response thereto until 10 days after service of notice of entry of the order disposing of the motion. Thus, plaintiffs’ amendment was both timely and sufficient to cure the defect in the complaint in compliance with CPLR 2101 (b). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.