alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 237/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 237 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6418 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 237

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6418 June 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 237/01 | Buying Social – A guide to taking account of social considerations in public procurement – Second edition | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 237/01

Buying Social – A guide to taking account of social considerations in public procurement – Second edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-2297

___________ Leslie Davis, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Hennepin County, a political * Appeal from the United States subdivision; Commissioner Johnson; * District Court for the Commissioner Opat; Commissioner * District of Minnesota. Stenglein; Commissioner Dorfman; * Commissioner Koblick; Commissioner * [UNPUBLISHED] McLaughlin; Security Officer Rob * Estes; Security Officer Jam * Henderson; Security Supervisor Mara; * Security Supervisor Billings; Security * Officer Sco Elmore; Security * Supervisor Columbein, and all others * unknown, all in their personal and * professional capacities, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 4, 2010 Filed: November 9, 2010

___________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United St ates District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and reco mmendations of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2- In this civil case removed from state c ourt, Leslie Davis appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his federal claims and remanding the remaining claims to state court. After careful de novo review, see Strand v. Diversified Collection Serv., Inc. , 380 F.3d 316, 317 (8th Cir. 2004), we agree with the district court that Davis’s free speech rights were not violated: the pleadings establish that Davis wished to speak in a limited designated public forum, th e protocol used to regulate the order of speakers was content neutral, Davis refused to follow that protocol and disrupted the meeting, and the security officers who removed him had probable cause to believe he was violating a Minnesota statute prohibiti ng disorderly conduct at public meetings. We reject Davis’s argument that the distri ct court improperly assumed facts, because they were established by his pleadings. A ccordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Global Telecommunication Solutions, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference to the registration statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-21339 and 333-59703) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-6925, 333-19005 and
333-68577) of Global Telecommunication Solutions, Inc. of our report dated March
20, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Global
Telecommunication Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and
1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
loss, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the
two -year period ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December
31, 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Global Telecommunication Solutions,
Inc.

Our report dated March 20, 2000, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a
significant net working capital deficiency at December 31 1999, which raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

                                                WISS & COMPANY, LLP

March 20, 2000
Livingston, New Jersey


                                       33
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7496

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SCOTTIE JENKINS, Defendant - Appellant. No. 03-7497

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SCOTTIE JENKINS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-99-769; CA-03-131-7-13AK) Submitted: February 12, 2004 De cided: February 20, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.- 2 - Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scottie Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Scottie Jenkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. The order is appealable only if a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Sl ack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jenkins has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I, Robert J. Pera, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Date: March 20, 2012                
|                                    
|/s/ Robert J. Pera                  
|Robert J. Pera                      
|Chief Executive Officer and Director
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Knight, Appellant.

(No. 30488

Decided October 31, 1945.)

*Mr. Rex W. Hanna,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Harry I. Kaylor,*for appellee.

*Mr. W. B. Price*and *Mr. E. B. Wetherill,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right he, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Bell, Williams, Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
As a Defense Intelligence Agency civilian employee/assigned military personnel, | understandthat | am
to:

Discharge my assigned duties conscientiously.

Conduct myself in a manner both on and off the job that reflects creditably upon the DIA.

Respect the authority of those directing my professional efforts.

Observe the spirit, 28 well asthe letter, of the rules of conduct, laws, and regulations governing my work
and behavior, to include the Conditions of Employment, have previously signed.

Adhere to all pertinent DoD and DIA regulations and policies when using DiA information systems. 1! understand
that intemet systems are routinely monitored. Although limited personal use is permitted, | understand that
misuse of Agency resources in any way, to include accessingthe Intemet to view sexually explicit documents,
images or messages are inappropriate

Maintain positive time keeping records as a civilian employee by accurately entering my actual time worked on my
et.

Request leave for all absences as specified by DIA procedures.

Pay financialobligations in @ proper end timely manner especially those imposed by! aw, such as federal, state
or local taxes or court judgments. as well as Government Travel Credit Card bills.

Attend reguiat ethics training conducted by GeneralCounsel and famili

myself with the Standards of Conduct.
Safeguard security information as required by security regulations.

Report all outside employment to my immediate supervisor for review. For possible conflict of interest and
notify my supervisor when outside employment is terminated.

Acknowledgement

| understand that should | fallto adhere to these responsibilities. | canexpect to be subject te disciplinary or
adverse ection up to and including remove! from employment, action under the Uniform Code of Military
Justice, as applicable, removalfrom the workplace and from DIA computer access, loss of security clearance
and/or referralto the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution, as appropriate. | further understand that
copy of this document will be maintained in my official personne! file.

1 have read and acknowledge receipt of this docurnent.

‘Signature Date
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.48 MB)

Tags:Defense Logistics Agency Energy, Rotation, Logistics Education Advancement Program, dla, DLA Energy , Defense Logistics Agency, AIR FORCE

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 173 (Thursday, September 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19270]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EL18-193-000]


Notice of Institution of Section 206 Proceeding and Refund 
Effective Date: Citizens Sycamore-Penasquitos Transmission LLC

    On August 30, 2018, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
EL18-193-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 
16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether 
Citizens Sycamore-Penasquitos Transmission LLC's proposed transmission 
owner tariff may be unjust and unreasonable. Citizens Sycamore-
Penasquitos Transmission LLC, 164 FERC 61,149 (2018).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL18-193-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL18-193-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 
days of the date of issuance of the order.

    Dated: August 30, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-19270 Filed 9-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Dawn ALUMBAUGH, Petitioner, v. Robert N. WHITE, Administrator of the Career Service Review Board of the State of Utah, an Agency of the State of Utah, Respondent.

No. 900315-CA.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

Oct. 29, 1990.

David J. Holdsworth (argued), Romney and Condie, Salt Lake City, for petitioner.

Stephen C. Schwendiman, Neal T. Gooch (argued), Tax & Business Regulation Div., Salt Lake City, for respondent.

Before JACKSON, ORME and BENCH (On Law and Motion), JJ.

PER CURIAM:

This proceeding for judicial review of an administrative determination adverse to the petitioner is before the court on a stipulated motion to remand this case for judicial review in the Third Judicial District Court. Based on this court’s consideration of the merits, and not based on the stipulation of the parties as to jurisdiction, the court determines that this matter should be transferred to the district court pursuant to Utah R.App.P. 44.

The court concludes (1) that the administrative review of petitioner’s grievance file, without a hearing, is properly characterized as an informal adjudicative proceeding under the Utah Administrative Procedure Act, Utah Code Ann. § 63-46b-5 (1989), and (2) that Rule 140-1-17B of the Career Services Review Board designating all adjudicative proceedings of the Career Services Review Board as formal adjudicative proceedings does not apply, and could not properly apply, to the summary dismissal of the grievance by the administrator upon review of petitioner’s file and in the absence of a hearing. For these reasons, we transfer this review of informal agency action to the Third Judicial District Court pursuant to Utah R.App.P. 44 for a trial de novo under the Utah Administrative Procedures Act, Utah Code Ann. § 63-46b-15 (1989).

JACKSON, ORME and BENCH, JJ., concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.32 MB)

Tags:DSCC, DLA Land & Maritime, columbus, EVENT, People and Culture

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the annual  report on Amendment  No. 1 on Form  10-KSB/A of
Arkona,  Inc. (the  "Company")  for the year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Alan Rudd,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Alan Rudd
--------------------------
Alan Rudd
Chief Executive Officer
April 24, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 178 (Thursday, September 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 46505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19915]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of NIGMS Support of 
Competitive Research (SCORE) Award Applications.
    Date: November 14, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road NW, Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Nina Sidorova, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 
3AN.22, Bethesda, MD 20892-6200, 301-594-3663, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aeddc7cac1dcc1d8cfeec0c7c9c3dd80c0c7c680c9c1d8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d3a0bab7bca1bca5b293bdbab4bea0fdbdbabbfdb4bca5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives; 93.859, Biomedical Research and 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 10, 2018.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-19915 Filed 9-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02511

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 02511\02511_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02511\02511_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 02511\02511_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02511\02511_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02511\02511_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02511\02511_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02511\02511_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

02511\Certification Statement Plant ID 02511.pdf Plant certification statement

x 02511\Email Correspondence with Plant ID 2511.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 02511\Questions and Answers for Plant2511 (Black River Generation).xlsx Questions and responses to followup

x 02511\Questions for Plant 2511 (Black River Generation).xlsx Draft Questions to Follow Up

02511\Supplemental Documents\Attachments\02511_MAP-1 ORIS 10464 5034-06-1600.00-0001 PLOT PLAN.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02511\Supplemental Documents\Attachments\02511_MAP-1 ORIS 10464.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02511\Supplemental Documents\Attachments\02511_MAP-2 ORIS 10464 Aerial Photo.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02511\Supplemental Documents\Attachments\02511_Table D-5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02511\Supplemental Documents\Attachments\02511_WB-1 ORIS 10464.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.