alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.24



 Exhibit 10.24 

 
 Private & Confidential 

 
 Dr P Boon 
 Hill View 
 Davenport Road 
 Lower Heswall 
 Wirral 
 CH60 9JD 
  

October 15 2015 
  
 Dear Phil, 
  
 I am
writing to you on behalf of the Compensation Committee of the Innospec Inc. Board to confirm the following changes to your terms and conditions and contract of employment, following the recent reorganization. These changes will be effective from
November 1, 2015. 
  

	 	1.	You will assume the role of Chief Operating Officer for Innospec Inc, reporting to Patrick Williams, President and Chief Executive Officer. In this role, you will be
responsible for leading the global Fuel Specialties business and will have an overseeing role for Performance Chemicals and Oilfield Specialties. 

  


	 	2.	Your basic salary will increase to £250,000 per annum 

  


	 	3.	Your bonus potential under the MICP program will remain unchanged 


 

	 	4.	In addition to the above, you will be eligible for an award of an option to acquire 20,000 shares in Innospec Inc. The options are granted at zero market price and will
vest as follows 

  

	 	a.	30% after 3 years from the date of grant. 

  

	 	b.	30% after 4 years from the date of grant 

  

	 	c.	40% after 5 years from the date of grant 

  

The vesting of the options will be subject to the following measures: 
  

	 	a)	You are still employed by Innospec Limited or any other Innospec company on the relevant vesting date and have not resigned from your employment with the company


  

	 	b)	Achievement of a minimum of a 3 (Good Performer) performance rating in each relevant year 

  

	 	5.	You are currently required to give the Company 6 months’ notice in writing of termination of your employment and the Company has the right to terminate your
employment by giving you twelve months’ notice in writing. From November 1 2015 until December 31 2020, the notice of termination of employment you are required to give to the Company will increase to 12 months’ notice in
writing. This will revert to 6 months’ notice from you in writing from January 1 2021. The notice of termination of employment the Company are required to give to you will remain 12 months throughout this period. 


 
 Please confirm your acceptance of these changes to your terms and conditions
of employment by signing and returning the attached copy of this letter. 







 I would like to take this opportunity on behalf of the Board to congratulate you on your promotion and to
wish you every success in your new role. 
  

	
	Yours sincerely
	
	




	Joachim Roeser
	 Chairman of the Compensation Committee
 Innospec Inc
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND
AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000919602
<NAME> WOODLAKE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,081
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,821
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,902)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (110)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (110)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (110)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                       TO
                         THE SIRENA APPAREL GROUP, INC.
                       1994 EMPLOYEE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


         The Sirena Apparel Group, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"),
has amended Section 5(a) of the 1994 Employee Stock Incentive Plan of the
Corporation (the "Plan"), duly adopted as of November 4, 1997, to read in full
as follows:

        "Section 5.  STOCK SUBJECT TO PLAN

        (a) At any time, the aggregate number of Common Shares issued or
issuable pursuant to all Awards (including all Incentive Stock Options) granted
under this Plan shall not exceed 1,172,465 subject to adjustment as provided in
Section 8 hereof."
#### DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF PINELLAS COUNTY, etc., and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, etc., Petitioners, v. SPECIAL DISABILITY FUND, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43368.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 21, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
## 255

**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

~oJzomblo Y. L. Pitman goant Attorn* &derron Coaa~ p1ortirrr, Texo#
mar Slrr Opinion Ro. O-7055 RI8 Whether

appllcablr to a orrtal ruoh bill.

contract mada **by ~looum**  **No. 2-**  Axiderson County, rooeiring sohool, **45,** sending **district, dated**  August ant and **reomtary of**  **the board**  **of**

and by the president and
the Sate 3

The oontraot appaara to be l.n proper form and to hate **bean** mado pursuant to the authority oonfrrmd **by** and **SOT**tha purpose8 ateted in Artlola VIII or Sanate Bill 167. **It tmnstars**  **all** the white scholastias of the sandfn,q district to the reoairing district for the cui- ent schocl yznr, excbrt ttose trensferred to mother

## 25

gonombla V, L. Pitaan -
&strlat prior toAugu8t Faga 

### 2
1, 

### 1945. Whlla lou do not 80 atata in your raqusst, wa praauma mat 

### the whit8 aoholaatloa of tha 

### aandlng dlatrlot ham bran attandlng 

### #ah001 intha?aoal+i~ l 

### ohool4~ringtha aurrant tam an6 thrtaram 

## #fthr oont?aot 

## wdttra to 

### tha stata luparlntandant haw barn ob- ~~~84 by 

### both dirtrlrtr, l aoh ot

### whioh l

### ra rtata 

### aid l 

### ohoolr. In riaa of tha iongoing, ua 

### ballava **wh@t**~88 

### raid In **our** opinion 

### Ho. O-6962, 

### a oopy of whfoh you lwa, 

### ia rpplloabla to thr ~rtant rlto4tion. In otha? worda, rhould tha Stat8 Buparlntandant sowl 

### pp?otathir aontraot, it 

### 18our opinion that

### rubh ap r0-1 

### ~0~14 not br an *adjurtmant of t?anata?amwithin 

### tha MUI JnB o? that w-8 88 wad 

### In motion 6, Artlola 1, ofBanata 

### Bill167, or would ruOhrpprorrl ba **“OOn8u8** 

### ohanga” **Within** 

### thr**maaning** Of 88id **888tiOn.** TO@?8Wtf tru4
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Pemstar Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Greg S. Lea, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

By:     /s/  Greg S. Lea
   ----------------------------
          Greg S. Lea
      Chief Financial Officer
July 10, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or any
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE> 1



The Board of Directors
R.H. Phillips, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in
the post-effective amendment no. 2 on Form
S-3 to the registration statement (No. 33-
83914-LA) on Form SB-2 and in the
registration statement (No. 33-93654) on
Form S-8 of R.H. Phillips, Inc. of our report
dated March 13, 1998, relating to  the
balance sheet of R.H. Phillips, Inc. as of
December 31, 1997, and the related
statements of operations, shareholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the two year period ended December 31,
1997, which report appears in the December
31, 1997, annual report on Form 10-KSB of
R.H. Phillips, Inc.

//s//KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Sacramento, California
March 27, 1998
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

October 27, 2017

 

Via EDGAR

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enduro Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,

N.A., Trustee for Enduro Royalty Trust

 
| By:        | /s/ SARAH NEWELL                                             |       |
|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** ** | **Sarah   Newell**                                           | ** ** |
| * *   | *    Vice   President and Trust Officer* | * *   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information from the financial
statements of Laboratory Specialists of America, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the
twelve months ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       727,381 
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              2,294,243  
<ALLOWANCES>                                 597,499
<INVENTORY>                                   99,754
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           3,194,480
<PP&E>                                     2,493,547
<DEPRECIATION>                               900,948     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             9,394,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2,191,768     
<BONDS>                                    1,245,690   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0  
<COMMON>                                       3,313  
<OTHER-SE>                                 5,646,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               9,394,808          
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           8,726,799           
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              3,816,114           
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             446,087       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            67,185        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,215,676        
<INCOME-TAX>                                 527,171       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          688,505       
<DISCONTINUED>                             1,274,216   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0       
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                               (585,711) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.18)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.15)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2:

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Hudson Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James R. Buscemi, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|s/ James R. Buscemi    
|-----------------------
|James R. Buscemi       
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|March 27, 2006
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7234

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALLEN EARL SMITH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-02-15; CA-04-155-H) Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: January 25, 2006 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allen Earl Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We recently concluded that the rule announced in United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. United States v. Morris , 429 F.3d 65, 72 (4th Cir. 2005). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Allen Earl Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and denying reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. *Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of Philip Rosen, Deceased. Elaine Rosen, Appellant; Marie Raum, Respondent.

In a proceeding, *inter alia,*to set aside a stipulation of settlement made in open court on July 20, 1987, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Scancarelli, J.), dated January 9, 1990, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed for reasons stated by Surrogate Scancarelli at the Surrogate’s Court, with costs to the respondent payable by the appellant. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 29149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12260]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Release Airport Property From Quitclaim Deed; 
Fort Lauderdale Executive Airport, Fort Lauderdale, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release 
approximately 64.32 acres of airport property at Fort Lauderdale 
Executive Airport, Fort Lauderdale, FL, from the conditions, 
reservations, and restrictions as contained in a Quitclaim Deed 
agreement between the FAA and the City of Fort Lauderdale, FL, dated 
March 11, 1947. The release of property will allow the City of Fort 
Lauderdale to dispose of the property for other than aeronautical 
purposes. The property is located within Tract 1 of F-X-E Plat (Parcels 
19B, 25, 26 and 27) at the northwest corner of W. Commercial Boulevard 
(S.R. 870) and NW. 12th Avenue. The parcels are currently designated as 
non-aeronautical land use. The property will be released of its federal 
obligations for commercial land use. The fair market value of these 
parcels have been determined to be $12,085,000.

DATES: Comments are due on or before June 19, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at Fort Lauderdale 
Executive Airport, 6000 NW 21st Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309; and 
the FAA Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 
400, Orlando, FL 32822. Written comments on the Sponsor's request must 
be delivered or mailed to: Marisol C. Elliott, Program Manager, Orlando 
Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400, 
Orlando, FL 32822-5024. Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are 
available for inspection by appointment only at Fort Lauderdale 
Executive Airport and by contacting the FAA at the address listed 
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisol C. Elliott, Program Manager, 
Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 
400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the 
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment prior to 
the ``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to 
use certain airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.

    Issued in Orlando, Florida on May 14, 2015.
Bart Vernace,
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2015-12260 Filed 5-19-15; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
EXHIBIT 32

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C.
20549

Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Enduro Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and
is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.



|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                                                               
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 15, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ MIKE ULRICH                                               
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Mike Ulrich                                                   
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Vice President
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00105-CV

Richard Clifford

v.

Shari McCall-Gruesen, as Trustee of 

the Gruesen Family Trust

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law

of Cooke County (CV11-00487)

October 23, 2014

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

JUDGMENT ON REHEARING

After considering the Appellant Richard Clifford’s motion for rehearing, we 

deny the motion. We withdraw our September 4, 2014 memorandum opinion 

and judgment and substitute the following.

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot