alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**Management Certification under Section 302 ofSarbanes Oxley:**

 

Karl L. Holz, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of EuroDisney S.A.S. (the “Management Company”), certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Euro Disney S.C.A. (the “Company”);

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The Company’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

 

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             TheCompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (orpersons performing equivalent functions):

 

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date:       April 4, 2006

 
|   | By:                                         | /s/ KARL L. HOLZ |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Karl L. Holz,                         |
|   | Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 02 3

- 3638 LT Case No. 2021

- CF

- 001096

- A

_____________________________
B ONNIE H ARTMANN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County

. Stephen E. Toner, Jr. , Judge

. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and J o speh Chloupek, Assistant Pub lic Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bonnie Hartman
, Ocala
, pro se

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General
, Tallahassee, and Al yssa M. Williams, Assistant Attorney General
, Daytona Beach , for Appellee.

August 27, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
J AY , E ISNAUGLE , and B OATWRIGHT , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
EX-10.1


 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 

EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement effective August 13,
2014 (the “Employment Agreement”), by and between Independence Contract Drilling, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ICD”) and Byron A. Dunn (“Executive”) is effective as of February 11, 2016. 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend certain provisions of the Employment Agreement relating to the level of benefits paid to
Executive in the event of termination of Executive’s employment without Cause or for Good Reason in contemplation of a Change of Control; 

NOW THEREFORE, In consideration of the mutual terms and agreement set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Defined Terms. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning assigned thereto in the Employment Agreement; 

  

	 	2.	Amendment. As of the date of this Amendment, Section 6(b)(vi) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 


“(vi) “Severance Multiple,” for purposes of calculating the Other Benefits due under this Section 6(b), shall be
two (2) times, and for purposes of calculating the Other Benefits due under Section 6(c) shall be 2.99 times. In addition, target Annual Bonus for purpose of calculating the Other Benefits due under Section 6(c) shall mean the target
Annual Bonus for the fiscal year in which termination of employment occurred.” 
 All other provisions of the Employment Agreement
shall remain unchanged, except as amended hereby, and all future references to the Employment Agreement, shall refer to the Employment Agreement, as amended by this Amendment. 

Dated Effective: February 11, 2016 
  

	
	INDEPENDENCE CONTRACT DRILLING, INC.
	
	By /s/ Philip A. Choyce
	Name: Philip A. Choyce
	Title: SVP &CFO
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	/s/ Byron A. Dunn
	Byron A. Dunn
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                STATE OR COUNTRY
                                                                OF INCORPORATION
                                                                ----------------

<S>       <C>                                                   <C>

 1)       Open Market Securities, Inc.                          Massachusetts
          One Wayside Road
          Burlington, Massachusetts

 2)       Open Market UK Limited                                United Kingdom
          Arundell House
          1 Farm Yard, 1st Floor
          Windor SL4 1QL,  UK

 3)       Open Market France SARL                               France
          8 Rue de Berri
          Paris, France

 4)       Open Market Germany GmbH                              Germany
          Merkurhaus Frankfurt
          Hessenring 121
          61348 Bad Homburg
          Germany

 5)       Open Market Pty Limited                               Australia
          P.O. Box R1608
          Royal Exchange NSW
          Sydney, Australia

 6)       Open Market Internet Software B.V.                    The Netherlands
          Wegalaan 32
          2132 JC Hoofddorp
          The Netherlands

 7)       Folio Corporation                                     Utah
          1 Wayside Road
          Burlington, Massachusetts

 8)       Waypoint Software Corporation                         Massachusetts
          1 Wayside Road
          Burlington, Massachusetts

 9)       Open Market Japan KK                                  Japan
          No. 2 Okamotoya Bldg.
          4F 1-22-16 Toranomon, Minato-ku
          Tokyo, Japan

<PAGE>

 10)      Open Market Italy s.r.l.                              Italy
          Corso Novara 2
          27029 Vigevano-PV
          Italy

 (11)     ICentral Incorporated                                 Utah
          5072 North 300 West
          Provo, Utah

 12       FutureTense, Inc.                                     Massachusetts
          1 Wayside Road
          Burlington, Massachusetts

</TABLE>
Password Protect In Adobe Acrobat

To Add or to Remove a PDF password

Or follow the graphics below:

To remove the password:

Follow the same sequence but instead of selecting option 2 for Encrypting with Password, go down to 

the bottom option (which is now enabled) and select Remove Password.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Denniston Gill, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bianchi, J.), rendered May 3, 1988, convicting him of rape in the third degree (two counts), sexual abuse in the third degree (two counts) and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the People failed to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt inasmuch as the testimony of the victim was allegedly inconsistent, contradictory and incredible. However, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Resolution of issues of credibility, including the credibility of the victim, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The alleged instances of prosecutorial misconduct during the cross-examination of the defendant, who testified on his own behalf, are unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Watts,*154 AD2d 723, 724; *People v Fisher,*148 AD2d 628, 629). The allegedly improper comments made *624by the prosecutor during summation are also unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Winfield,*154 AD2d 725; *People v Fisher, supra; People v Flores,*139 AD2d 525, 526). In any event, the defendant’s contentions are without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the annual report of Reg Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A, Amendment No. 1 for the year ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John G. Robertson, CEO and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: March 17, 2011 /s/   John G. Robertson John G. Robertson, CEO and Director
#### In the Matter of the Adoption of Mark L., Jr., an Infant. Thelma M., Respondent, v Mark L., Sr., Appellant.

Order of the Family Court, Bronx County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, J.), entered on or about June 27, 1990, dispensing with the putative father’s consent to the adoption of the infant child is unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record evinces that the putative father intended to forego his parental or custodial obligations pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 111 (2) (a). The putative father is *159currently incarcerated, having been convicted on his plea of guilty of the stabbing and strangulation of the child’s unwed mother. Letters and phone calls made by the putative father to petitioner, the maternal grandmother, during his incarceration did not constitute the substantial or repeated contact contemplated by Domestic Relations Law § 111.

In as much as the maternal grandmother, with whom the child has resided since birth, is able to provide for his physical and emotional well being, the best interest of the child would be promoted by granting the petition for adoption. Furthermore, the petitioner father’s long term incarceration would preclude any type of relationship with the child. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report
of Montalvo Spirits, Inc. (formerly known as Advanced Cloud Storage, Inc.) (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Carlos Gonzalez Rivera, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: February 19, 2013 |  | /s/ Carlos Gonzalez Rivera                                                                            
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | Name: Carlos Gonzalez Rivera                                                                          
|                        |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2012 (the Report) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, MICHAEL S. GROSS, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|      |  |                        
|----- |  | -----------------------
|      | 
|      |  | /s/    MICHAEL S.
GROSS
|Name: |  | Michael S. Gross       
|Date: |  | July 31, 2012
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. N00024-l l-C-4400 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59793

Robert E. Korroch, Esq. Cameron M. Rountree, Esq.

Williams Mullen Newport News, VA Ronald J. Borro, Esq.

Navy ChiefTrial Attorney Bruce S. Potocki, Esq.

Assistant Counsel Southwest Regional Maintenance Center San Diego, CA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 2 February 2016

# ~?~~ i1ARKN.

# STEMP~ Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59793, Appeal ofBAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Greg S. Lea, Chief Financial Officer of Pemstar Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 14, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Greg S. Lea        
|Greg S. Lea            
|Chief Financial Officer
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998), PART 39.001(1) 

CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY 

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 

 Page 1 of 1 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

On the effective date specified below, and for the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below revokes 

Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/GA8/5 Amdt 2 and issues the following AD under subregulation 39.001(1) of CASR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out 

in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical 

product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the 

requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section. 

Gippsland Aeronautics GA8 Series Aeroplanes 

AD/GA8/5 

Amdt 3 

Horizontal Stabiliser Inspection 8/2010 

Applicability: All GA8 aircraft serial numbers GA8-00-004 and above, and GA8-TC 320 model, all 

serial numbers. 

Requirement: Accomplish the requirements of Gippsland Aeronautics mandatory service bulletin 

SB-GA8-2002-02, Issue 5, dated 13 November 2008. 

Compliance: As per requirement document. 

 This Amendment becomes effective on 13 April 2010. 

Background: Inspection of a high time aircraft has revealed cracks in the Horizontal Stabiliser rear 

spar splice plate and inboard main ribs around the area of the Horizontal Stabiliser 

rear pivot attachment. Additionally, failure of some attach bolts in service may be 

due to improper assembly. 

This amendment is issued to clarify the model applicability. 

The previous amendment was issued because the requirement document now contains 

an inspection for cracking in horizontal stabilisers which have load transferring 

fittings installed. 

Previous amendments of this AD listed the AD requirements in full. Due to the 

extensive use of diagrams and photographs, it is no longer appropriate or practical to 

write the requirements of the service bulletin out in full in this AD. All requirements, 

accomplishment instructions and illustrations are contained in the service bulletin. 

The original issue of this AD became effective on 15 February 2007. 

Amendment 2 of this AD became effective on 12 March 2009. 

Mike Higgins 

Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 

9 April 2010
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.37 MB)

Tags:DLA Disposition Services, dla, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery