alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice: (18-068)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announces a meeting of the Earth Science Advisory Committee (ESAC). This Committee functions in an advisory capacity to the Director, Earth Science Division, in the NASA Science Mission Directorate. The meeting will be held for the purpose of soliciting, from the science community and other persons, scientific and technical information relevant to program planning.

# DATES:

Thursday, October 4, 2018, 3:30 p.m.-4:30 p.m., Eastern Time.

# ADDRESSES:

                        This meeting will take place telephonically. Any interested person must use a touch-tone phone to participate in this meeting. Any interested person may call the USA toll                               ( print page 46762)                            free number 1-888-577-8996, passcode 2196080.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. KarShelia Henderson, Science Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-2355, fax (202) 358-2779, or                         *khenderson@nasa.gov.*

The agenda for the meeting includes the following topic:

—Earth Science program annual performance review according to the Government Performance and Results Act Modernization Act.

It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Patricia Rausch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 2018-19953 Filed 9-13-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of AXIM International, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Dr. George Anastassov


Dr. George Anastassov


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer


Principal Accounting Officer





August 14, 2014
U.S. flag
        An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowGovernment Website**Official websites use .gov**
              
                              A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
        Safely connect using HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
              
              A **lock**
                (A locked padlock)
                or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.  
 Menu

      close
        
                            Enter Search Term
                Search
      Browse All Media
      
    
              Collections
      
    
              Photos
      
    
              Videos
      
    
              Audios
      
    
              Graphics Breadcrumb
Media Library
  Graphics
  La Órden de salud pública bajo el Título 42 vs las consecuencias de la ley bajo el Título 8

     La Órden de salud pública bajo el Título 42 vs las consecuencias de la ley bajo el Título 8
Image: La Órden de salud pública bajo el Título 42 vs las consecuencias de la ley bajo el Título 8
        Download
                                        Graphic Usage Guidelines
        La Órden de salud pública bajo el Título 42 vs las consecuencias de la ley bajo el Título 8  (DHS Graphic by U.S. Department of Homeland Security/Released) Return to top

           Browse All Media
      
    
                  Collections
      
    
                  Photos
      
    
                  Videos
      
    
                  Audios
      
    
                  Graphics
                            
        U.S. Department of Homeland Security Seal
      
    DHS.gov
                  An official website of the U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityAbout DHS
                              Accessibility
                              Budget and Performance
                              DHS Components
                              FOIA Requests
                              No FEAR Act Data
                              Privacy Policy
                              Site Links
                              Office of Inspector General
                              The White House
                              USA.gov

                        Looking for U.S. government information and services?
                Visit USA.gov
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19608]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse Amended; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, September 25, 2018, 
10:00 a.m. to September 25, 2018, 12:00 p.m., National Institutes of 
Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 
20852 which was published in the Federal Register on August 15, 2018, 
83 159 FR 2018-17674.
    The meeting date was changed to October 9, 2018. The meeting time 
did not change. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: September 5, 2018.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-19608 Filed 9-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Robert A. Hamwee, Chief Executive Officer of New Mountain Finance AIV Holdings Corporation, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of New Mountain Finance AIV Holdings Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated this day of August 23, 2011

 
| /s/ Robert A. Hamwee |
|----------------------|
| **Robert A. Hamwee** |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Theodore L.
Koening, Chief Executive Officer, in connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 14, 2013



/s/ Theodore L. KoenigTheodore L. Koenig Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)Monroe Capital Corporation
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 13, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 13, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19I0082. TRACIE LYNNE UNDERWOOD v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

16CR0437
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10541]

By virtue of the authority vested in me as the Secretary of State, including pursuant to section 7045(a)(3)(A) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2018 (Div. K, Pub. L. 115-141) (SFOAA), I hereby certify that the central government of Guatemala is:
    - Informing its citizens of the dangers of the journey to the southwest border of the United States;
    - combating human smuggling and trafficking;
    - improving border security, including preventing illegal migration, human smuggling and trafficking, and trafficking of illicit drugs and other contraband; and
    - cooperating with United States Government agencies and other governments in the region to facilitate the return, repatriation, and reintegration of illegal migrants arriving at the southwest border of the United States who do not qualify for asylum, consistent with international law.

                    This certification shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and, along with the accompanying Memorandum of Justification, shall be reported to Congress.                

Dated: August 11, 2018.

Michael R. Pompeo,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-19777 Filed 9-11-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.28 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, DLA Distribution Red River, dla, LTC Anthony Stoeger, Veterans day, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1253, -1260 APPLERA CORPORATION — APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS GROUP, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. ILLUMINA, INC. and STEPHEN C. MACEVICZ, Defendants-Appellees, and SOLEXA, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in

case no. 07-CV-02845, Judge William H. Alsup.

ON MOTION Before LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Applera Corporation — Applied Biosystems Group moves to reform the caption to designate it as the appellant and to designate Solexa, Inc. as the cross-appellant. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28.1(b), we modify the caption as reflected above. Additionally, the court identifies Illumina, Inc. and Stephen C. Macevicz as appellees in the caption. If Illumina and Macevicz do not intend to participate as appellees, then they should promptly notify the court. If Illumina and Macevicz do intend to participate, then they may not file a brief separate from the brief filed by Solexa. Instead, because the defendants are all represented by the same law firm, the defendants may only file acombined brief. See Practice Note following Fed. Cir. R. 28. The combined brief may

not exceed the brief lengths permitted for cross-appellants in Fed. R. App. P. 28.1(e)(2). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted to the extent that the modified official caption is reflected above. The appellant's opening brief is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT



### APR 13 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk u.s. COUR TI MPFMLS FOR THE F EDERAL CIRCUIT
APR 1 3 2009
Jlua t CLERK cc: Edward R. Reines, Esq. Kevin M. Flowers, Esq. S8

2009-1253, -1260 - 2 -
#### John Mario DeGAGLIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-108.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 30, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 10, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Donna Barbara et al., Respondents, v Brunswick Hospital Center, Inc., Defendant, and County of Nassau, Sued Herein as Nassau County Medical Center, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of alleged medical malpractice, the defendant County of Nassau appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated September 12, 1989, which granted *793the plaintiffs motion to depose 15 designated individuals who were its employees.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the examinations before trial of the designated employees shall proceed upon notice at a time and place to be mutually agreed upon, and shall continue day-to-day until completed.

We find that in this complicated medical malpractice action, the plaintiff has made an adequate showing that the designated hospital employees were observers and participants in the events surrounding the surgery of the infant plaintiff, with the result that these employees very probably "possess knowledge of facts bearing on the controversy which will assist plaintiff in preparing for trial” *(Heil v Nassau Hosp.,*99 AD2d 482; *Hughson v St. Francis Hosp.,*96 AD2d 829; *Gregoritsch v Mather Mem. Hosp.,*88 AD2d 987). In view of the evidence that the defendant Nassau County has impeded the discovery process *(Matter of Rattner v Planning Commn.,*110 AD2d 840), we conclude that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in ordering the depositions of the 15 designated individuals. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Evelyn Ferrer et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered August 16, 1989, which denied petitioners’ application to file a late notice of claim against the respondent City of New York, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the application is granted, without costs.

On October 17, 1988, petitioner Karl Ferrer sustained injuries when he tripped on debris while working at a construction site owned by the City of New York. He consulted an attorney in March 1989, and applied April 2, 1989 for permission to file a late notice of claim under General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), alleging that he had been confined to bed except for visits to a hospital and his doctor, that the City had representatives at the job site whom he believed had notice of the accident and were familiar with the surrounding conditions, and that the City would not be prejudiced by the two and one-half month delay in filing a notice of claim.

*241General Municipal Law § 50-e permits the courts to strike an equitable balance between a public corporation’s need for prompt notification of a claim against it, and an injured party’s interest in just compensation *(Matter of Gerzel v City of New York,*117 AD2d 549). The City claimed that in view of the petitioners’ failure to give timely notice, there was "no way that the City can reconstruct the conditions prevailing then.” However, since the injury herein allegedly resulted from a fall on construction debris at a massive construction site, it is highly unlikely that the conditions existing at the time of the accident would have existed until the end of the 90-day period in which a claim could have been timely filed; thus the additional two and one-half month delay appears not to have been substantially prejudicial. Upon evaluating the circumstances presented by petitioners’ application in light of the criteria set forth in General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), we conclude that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying petitioners leave to adjudicate their claims on the merits *(Matter of Nayyar v Board of Educ.,*169 AD2d 628). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin, Wallach and Ross, JJ.