alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Intelligence AgencyCOMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN DEFENSE OF THE NATION

Search
Search

Search
                    - Facilities Operating Status
                    - Employee Resources

-  Home		 
-  About    -  FAQs             
  -  Organization      -  Locations             
    -  Missile and Space Intelligence Center             
    -  Joint Military Attache School             
    -  Joint Military Intelligence Training Center 
  -  Open Source Intelligence             
  -  Equal Opportunity & Diversity             
  -  History      -  DIA Museum             
    -  George Washington Letters             
    -  Directors of DIA             
    -  The Historians 
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response             
  -  Contact Us 
-  News & Features    -  Articles             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  Videos             
  -  DIA in the News             
  -  Threat Reports             
  -  Photo Gallery             
  -  No FEAR             
  -  Podcasts 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Career Fields      -  Analysis             
    -  Counterintelligence             
    -  Finance & Acquisition             
    -  Human Intelligence             
    -  Human Services             
    -  Information Technology             
    -  Inspector General             
    -  Legal             
    -  Mission Management             
    -  Office Management & Infrastructure             
    -  Science & Technology             
    -  Security 
  -  Search Vacancies             
  -  Apply to DIA             
  -  Hiring Process             
  -  Internships             
  -  Veteran Programs 
-  Business    -  Contractor Personnel Security             
  -  SIA3             
  -  SITE III             
  -  Innovation             
  -  NeedipeDIA             
  -  Office of Small Business Programs             
  -  Small Business FAQs 

HOMENEWS & FEATURES

Search

Search

                            - All Images 
                            - Other 

                            - Upload Date
                            - Photo Date
                            - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (3.56 MB)

Tags:Operation Desert Storm, Red Bulls, 34th ID, 34th Red Bull Infantry Division, U.S. Army Central Command, Task Force Spartan, U.S. Army, Army, USARCENT, Kuwait, History, Partnership, National Guard, Operation Spartan Shield, Minnesota, Kuwait Land Forces, Kuwait Armed Forces, Iraq War, Kuwait Liberation Day, 34ID

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
   
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JAN-05-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             JAN-05-1997
<CASH>                                         3,982
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    494
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                   11,181
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              19,741
<PP&E>                                       249,804<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                               109,679<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               261,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         32,317
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0 
<COMMON>                                          13 
<OTHER-SE>                                   146,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 261,577
<SALES>                                       35,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             254,395                             
<CGS>                                         21,143
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                246,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0                                        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,612 
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,006<F3>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,606<F3>
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0                                  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,606<F3>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.12<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES $183,264 OF VIDEOCASSETTE RENTAL INVENTORY.
<F2>INCLUDES $93,335 OF ACCUMULATED AMORTIZATION ON VIDEOCASSETTE RENTAL
    INVENTORY.
<F3>PRO FORMA  AMOUNTS  TO  REFLECT  INCOME TAX  EXPENSE  WHICH  WOULD HAVE BEEN
    RECOGNIZED IF THE COMPANY,  HOME VISION AND HOLLYWOOD  VIDEO HAD BEEN TAXED
    AS C CORPORATIONS FOR ALL PERIODS PRESENTED. SEE FORM 10-K.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
DIA: Impacting National Security in the 1970s
 
  By DIA History Office
  Increases in missions and responsibilities while suffering enormous budget and personnel cuts due to defense budget reductions significantly challenged DIA during the 1970’s. Added to this was an expanding global threat environment, which included the breakdown of détente between the United States and Soviet Union.
In addition to the overarching Cold War struggle with the USSR, DIA addressed the rise of the Ostpolitik in Germany, the emergence of the Palestine Liberation Organization in the Middle East, and growing arms control concerns.
Riots in Gdansk, Poland, civil wars in Jordan and Nigeria, and the United States’ incursion into Cambodia from South Vietnam also drew intelligence interest.
Other crises during this period included Idi Amin’s takeover in Uganda, the unrest in Pakistan, the formation of Bangladesh, the continued fighting in Southeast Asia, the death of Mao Zedong, aircraft hijackings, and the Israeli raid on Entebbe Airport.
The Agency’s reputation grew considerably during this period, as its products were increasingly perceived throughout the government as valuable to decision-making.
Despite overall reductions in personnel, the agency expanded the Defense Attache Service and forward deployed officers during this time. However, such efforts came with a cost.
On June 10, 1970, Maj. Robert Perry, DIA’s assistant army attache to Jordan, was shot and killed by Palestinians in Amman. Perry was DIA’s first duty-related death.
Five years later on April 4, 1975, while the 87 DIA employees deployed to Saigon were leaving Vietnam, five officers perished, in a plane crash as part of Operation Baby Lift.
This would be the highest loss of DIA lives in a single event until the Sept. 11, 2001 attack on the Pentagon.
Throughout the decade, the Agency was deeply involved in the arms control process by verifying treaties and providing direct support to the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Staff for the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks.
In the latter part of the decade, the Agency’s primary focus was providing intelligence collection management and analysis in support of the Cold War.
Rapid technological advances occurred throughout the decade.
Imagery collected by the U-2, SR-71, AQM-34 drones and satellite systems significantly strengthened DIA’s imagery exploitation operations and expanded the Agency’s ability to support the services for wartime targeting and contingency planning.
And although intelligence dissemination was conducted manually, information technology assisted in the intelligence collection process through the use of large mainframe computers that searched message traffic.
At this time, the Agency began setting up what would eventually become the Department of Defense Intelligence Information System.
The late 1970’s proved no safer to United States national interests than the beginning of the decade.
Special DIA task forces were set up to monitor additional crises, such as the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the overthrow of the Iranian monarchy, and the taking of U.S. hostages in the American Embassy in Tehran in 1979.
#### City of New York et al., Respondents, v Susan Simmonds, Also Known as Juanita Simmonds, et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendants’ motion to vacate the default judgment entered against them. The default cannot be considered "excusable” as required by CPLR 5015 (a) (1). Defendants were given a trial date and a five-month adjournment to obtain counsel. They were fully aware that they had to return to court on that date for trial, whether or not they had an attorney to represent them. The court’s directives were neither ambiguous nor confusing, as argued by defendants. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Kings County, Spodek, J.—Vacate Judgment.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I,
Christopher Pappas, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of The Chefs Warehouse, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 13, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Christopher Pappas                                                  
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Christopher Pappas Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reese Augustine, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rienzi, J.), rendered February 16, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*844Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Under Indictment No. 2544/88, the defendant was charged with criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (two counts). The defendant contends that the indictment was defective and, thus, should have been dismissed because there was a six-day lapse between the time the Grand Jury was instructed on the legal principles and definitions pertinent to narcotics cases and the Grand Jury’s vote to indict him. We disagree.

On April 26, 1988, the prosecutor instructed the Grand Jury on the law and terminology applicable to narcotics cases, including, *inter alia,*the definition of "acting in concert” *(see,*Penal Law § 20.00), the adequacy of which instruction the defendant does not call into question. The next day, April 27, 1988, the prosecutor presented the case concerning the defendant to the Grand Jury. Five days later, on May 2, 1988, before the Grand Jury voted and returned the indictment, the prosecutor marshaled the evidence at the Grand Jury’s request. Further, after marshaling the evidence, the prosecutor expressed her willingness to clarify any terms or applicable law to the Grand Jury, but it declined the offer, demonstrating its continued understanding of the initial instructions. Accordingly, we find that the Grand Jury proceedings were not defective merely because of the six-day lapse between the prosecutor’s initial instructions and the Grand Jury’s vote to indict the defendant *(see, People v Calbud, Inc.,*49 NY2d 389, 393-396; *People v Kennedy,*127 Misc 2d 712). Indeed, the elements of the crimes with which the defendant was ultimately charged were not complex *(see,*Penal Law §§ 220.03, 220.16 [1]; § 220.39 [1]).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit *(see, People v Colon,*71 NY2d 410, *cert denied*487 US 1239; *People v Jones,*170 AD2d 622; *People v Weaver,*162 AD2d 486; *People v Carvey,*161 AD2d 656, 656-657). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

August 24, 2023

DIA releases updated report on Russia’s use of lethal Iranian unmanned 

aerial vehicles (UAVs) in Ukraine; UAV display to continue

JOINT BASE ANACOSTIA-BOLLING — The Defense Intelligence Agency is releasing an update 

to its unclassified report, “Iranian UAVs in Ukraine: A Visual Comparison.”

The original unclassified report, released by DIA in February, confirmed Russia’s use of various 

lethal Iranian UAVs against Ukraine. These UAVs have become a critical part of Russia’s war in 

Ukraine and are being used to attack critical infrastructure. The update features additional 

findings and declassified images to disprove Iran’s continued claims that Russia is not using its 

UAVs in Ukraine.

The updated report draws from DIA’s ongoing display of components from several Iranianproduced UAVs recovered from both Ukraine and Iraq. The display includes portions of 

Shahed-131 UAVs used by Russia against Ukraine and Shahed-131 UAVs recovered in Iraq, 

including an attack Iran publicly claimed. The display marks the first time these models have 

been displayed in the same place. This is also the first public showing of the newly declassified 

Shahed-101, a smaller Iranian UAV recovered in Iraq. DIA’s UAV display proves that while 

these UAVs were recovered thousands of miles apart, they share a common point of origin: 

Iran.

Multiple media outlets, foreign delegations, and other government agencies have visited the 

display to discuss the analysis with DIA’s subject matter experts and gain a better 

understanding of the growing threat from these systems. These components, obtained during 

sensitive site exploitation, will remain on display at DIA at least until early September.

Members of the media are encouraged to contact DIA public affairs (dia-pao@dodiis.mil) for 

more information on the UAV report and the UAV display.

DIA’s mission is to provide intelligence on foreign militaries to prevent and decisively win wars.

DIA officers are united in a common vision — to be the indispensable source of defense 

intelligence expertise for the nation. For 60 years, DIA has met the full range of security 

challenges faced by the United States. DIA intelligence officers operate around the world, 

supporting customers from forward-deployed warfighters to national policymakers.

###
UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Very Respectfully, 

Public Affairs Team

Defense Intelligence Agency
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Potomac Bancshares, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Gayle Marshall Johnson, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1)The Report fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2)     The information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      result of operations of the company.
| |                                                                                                                                                                       

|/s/ Gayle Marshall Johnson                           | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                    
|Gayle Marshall
      Johnson                         | 
|Sr. Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer | 
|March 24,
      2006                                 | 

68

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Redstone Literary Agents, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2013 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mary S.
Wolf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of May, 2013.


/s/ Mary S. Wolf
-------------------------------
Mary S. Wolf
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
             PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Jeffrey Johnson, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report of GWIN, Inc.;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

         (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business
issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 1, 2004

/s/ Jeffrey Johnson
Jeffrey Johnson
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 10.8


 


AMENDMENT


TO THE


HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.


RETIREMENT PLAN FOR EXECUTIVES IN CAREER
BAND 6 AND ABOVE


 


The Honeywell International
Inc. Retirement Plan for Executives in Career Band 6 and Above shall be, and hereby is, amended by inserting the following new
paragraph at the end of Section 4.1:


 


“Notwithstanding any provision
of this Plan to the contrary, the Supplemental Benefit for a Participant who is accruing a benefit in this Plan as of December
31, 2015 shall be calculated by taking into account the amendments that were made to the Retirement Program definitions of Compensation,
Final Average Compensation, and Social Security Benefit (as defined in the Retirement Program). For the avoidance of doubt, Final
Average Compensation shall be frozen as of December 31, 2015 and no amounts earned or paid, or deemed earned or paid, after December
31, 2015 shall be included in Compensation; provided, however, that amounts earned in 2015 and paid in March 2016 under the Honeywell
Management Incentive Plan, the Honeywell International Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Employees, or the Honeywell
Capital Management Incentive Compensation Plan shall be included in 2015 Compensation.”