alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 796 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 158
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 796

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 302 East Green Street in Champaign, Illinois, as the ``James R. 
                  Burgess Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 2013

 Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Kirk) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             July 31, 2013

               Reported by Mr. Carper, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 302 East Green Street in Champaign, Illinois, as the ``James R. 
                  Burgess Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JAMES R. BURGESS JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 302 East Green Street in Champaign, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``James R. Burgess Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James R. 
Burgess Jr. Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 158

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 796

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 302 East Green Street in Champaign, Illinois, as the ``James R. 
                  Burgess Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 31, 2013

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>

                                 CLIMACHEM, INC.
                               SUBSIDIARY LISTING
                            REVISED FEBRUARY 26, 1999


CLIMACHEM, INC.
     Northwest Financial Corporation
     Climate Mate, Inc.
     The Environmental Group International Limited
     LSB Chemical Corp.
          Total Energy Systems Limited
                 Total Energy Systems (NZ) Limited
                 T.E.S. Mining Services Pty. Ltd.
                 Total Energy Systems (International) Pty Ltd
          El Dorado Chemical Company
                 Slurry Explosive Corporation
          El Dorado Nitrogen Company (f/k/a LSB Nitrogen Corporation,
            f/k/a LSB Import Corp.)
          DSN Corporation
          Universal Tech Corporation
     The Environmental Group, Inc.
     International Environmental Corporation
     Climate Master, Inc.
     CHP Corporation
          Koax Corp.
     APR Corporation
     ClimateCraft, Inc. (f/k/a Summit Machine Tool Systems, Inc.)
     ACP International Limited (f/k/a ACP Manufacturing Corp.)
     ThermalClime, Inc. (f/k/a LSB South America Corporation)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.26 MB)

Tags:McNamara Headquarters Complex, Simone Reba, DLA Finance, Audit Readiness, financial stewardship, dla, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
CNP_Exhibit 10(zz)_12.31.2013






Exhibit 10(zz)
    




OMNIBUS AMENDMENT
CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC. BENEFIT PLANS
WHEREAS, CenterPoint Energy, Inc., a Texas corporation (the “Company”), maintains and sponsors the CenterPoint Energy Retirement Plan, the CenterPoint Energy Savings Plan, the CenterPoint Energy Benefit Restoration Plan, the CenterPoint Energy Savings Restoration Plan, the CenterPoint Energy Short Term Incentive Plan and the CenterPoint Energy, Inc. Group Welfare Benefits Plan (collectively, the “Plans”); and
WHEREAS, under the terms of the Plans, the Company has the authority to amend the Plans; and
WHEREAS, effective as of June 1, 2013, Milton Carroll shall become executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”); and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to provide that the position of executive Chairman of the Board shall not be covered by or eligible to participate in the Plans;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plans, effective as of June 1, 2013, to provide that the position of executive Chairman of the Board is not covered by or eligible to participate in the Plans and amends the eligibility and all other relevant provisions of the Plans as otherwise necessary to reflect the foregoing.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. has caused these presents to be executed by their duly authorized officers in a number of copies, all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument, which may be sufficiently evidenced by any executed copy thereof, this 23rd day of May, 2013, but effective as of June 1, 2013.




	
			
	 
	CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC.


	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ David M. McClanahan

	 
	Name:
	David M. McClanahan

	 
	Title:
	President and Chief Executive Officer
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 7 

To improve the resilience of the United States to extreme weather events 

and to prevent the worsening of extreme weather conditions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2013 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. CARPER, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. 

SANDERS, Mr. BROWN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. 

CARDIN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. SCHATZ, Mr. COONS, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. HIRONO, Ms. CANTWELL, and Mr. 

BEGICH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To improve the resilience of the United States to extreme 

weather events and to prevent the worsening of extreme 

weather conditions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Extreme Weather Pre5 vention and Resilience Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE SENATE. 

7 It is the sense of the Senate that Congress should— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 7 IS

1 (1) prepare and protect communities from ex2 treme weather, sea-level rise, drought, flooding, wild3 fire, and other changing conditions exacerbated by 

4 carbon pollution; 

5 (2) promote close coordination across Federal 

6 agencies and provide strong support to States, In7 dian tribes, and public and private sector entities to 

8 prepare for and withstand extreme weather; 

9 (3) promote investment in new infrastructure 

10 and replace aging and obsolete infrastructure to en11 sure resilience to extreme weather, disasters, and 

12 hydrological change; 

13 (4) promote investment in clean energy infra14 structure, energy efficiency, and other measures to 

15 address dangerous air, land, and water pollution; 

16 (5) promote development of clean energy tech17 nologies that reduce demand for oil, contribute to 

18 economic growth and job creation, and put the 

19 United States at the forefront of the global clean en20 ergy market; and 

21 (6) ensure that the Federal Government is a 

22 leader in reducing pollution, promoting the use of 

23 clean energy sources, and improving energy effi24 ciency. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Jurisdiction of
Name                                     Incorporation         Date of Incorporation                Status
----                                     -------------         ---------------------                ------
<S>                                      <C>                    <C>                      <C>            
Global Link Telecom Corporation            Delaware               March 28, 1994         Wholly-owned subsidiary

GTS Marketing, Inc.                        Delaware                April 3, 1995         Wholly-owned subsidiary

Global Telecommunication
Solutions (Canada) Inc.                   Winnipeg, Manitoba     December 6, 1995        Wholly-owned subsidiary
 
Centerpiece Communications, Inc.          New Jersey               June 16, 1996         Wholly-owned subsidiary

Networks Around The World, Inc.           New Jersey             February 1, 1994        Wholly-owned subsidiary

Global Telecommunications                Mexico, D.F.             January 6, 1998        Wholly-owned subsidiary
Solutions de Mexico

GTS Holding Corp., Inc.                    Delaware              November 16, 1998       Wholly-owned subsidiary

Teltime, Inc.                              Delaware              November 12, 1998       Wholly-owned subsidiary of

GTS Holding Corp., Inc.
Network Services System, Inc.              Delaware              November 17, 1998       Wholly-owned subsidiary of

GTS Holding Corp., Inc.
Network Services System, L.P.              Delaware              December 2, 1998        Network Services System,
                                                                                         Inc. is the General Partner
                                                                                         of GTS Marketing, Inc. is
                                                                                         the Limited Partner

Global Telecommunication                   Delaware              December 2, 1998        GTS Marketing, Inc. is the
Solutions, Inc.                                                                          General Partner and Network
                                                                                         Services System, Inc. is
                                                                                         the Limited Partner
</TABLE>



<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Intelligence Group, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald E. Brown, M.D., Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




­/s/ Donald E. Brown, M.D.
 Donald E. Brown, M.D.
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 June 22, 2012
#### Gaetano PELUSO, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff).

No. 89-252.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Dec. 15, 1989.

*224Gaetano Peluso, pro se.

Joseph B. Meyer, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before CARDINE, C.J., and THOMAS, URBIGKIT, MACY and GOLDEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Gaetano Peluso appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion for credit against his minimum sentence for time served in the county jail.

We affirm.

Appellant pleaded guilty and was sentenced to the Wyoming State Penitentiary for a term of three to ten years for one count of taking indecent liberties with a minor; two terms of three to five years each for two counts of third-degree sexual assault; and three terms of six months each for three counts of furnishing alcohol to minors. The district court ordered that the sentences run concurrently. Appellant received credit against his maximum sentence for time served in the county jail. He filed several motions for reduction of sentence, and all were denied. Eventually, he filed a motion seeking credit against his *minimum*sentence for time served in the county jail. The district court denied the motion, and Appellant appealed that decision.

Although no briefs have been filed, it is apparent that the only issue Appellant could raise is whether the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for credit against his minimum sentence for jail time served. We have previously disposed of such eases summarily and without briefing. *McFarlane v. State,*781 P.2d 931 (Wyo.1989); *Peper v. State,*768 P.2d 26 (Wyo.1989); *Mower v. State,*770 P.2d 233 (Wyo.1989).

The district court has broad discretion in determining whether to grant a motion for credit of time served in jail against a minimum sentence, and we will not disturb its determination absent an abuse of that discretion. A district court is not required to grant credit against a minimum sentence for time served in jail preceding sentencing as long as the sentence is otherwise legal. *Lightly v. State,*739 P.2d 1232 (Wyo.1987). The record is clear that, during the sentencing hearing, the district court specifically considered and decided not to give Appellant credit against his minimum sentence for the time he was incarcerated in the county jail. The record is also clear that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Appellant’s motion for credit against his minimum sentence.

Affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

THOMAS DAVID WHOLECHEESE, Jr., 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-30145 

D.C. No. 4:16-cr-00008-RRB-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Alaska

Ralph R. Beistline, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 20, 2021**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Thomas David Wholecheese, Jr., appeals from the district court’s orders

denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)

and motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We 

vacate and remand with instructions that the motion be dismissed without 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-30145 

prejudice.

An inmate may file a motion for compassionate release in the district court 

“after the defendant has fully exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure 

of the Bureau of Prisons to bring a motion on the defendant’s behalf or the lapse of 

30 days from the receipt of such a request by the warden of the defendant’s 

facility.” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). The record shows that Wholecheese did not 

fulfill either requirement prior to filing his compassionate release motion in the 

district court. In light of the mandatory language of the statute,1the district court 

lacked authority to address Wholecheese’s motion. See Ross v. Blake, 136 S. Ct. 

1850, 1856-57 (2016). 

Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s orders and remand with 

instructions that it dismiss Wholecheese’s motion without prejudice. Wholecheese 

is free to file another motion for compassionate release in the district court, and we 

express no opinion as to the merits of such a motion.

VACATED and REMANDED.

1 Because it does not affect our decision, we do not decide whether the exhaustion 

requirement under § 3582(c)(1)(A) is jurisdictional or “a mandatory claimprocessing rule subject to forfeiture,” Fort Bend Cnty. v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 1843, 

1851 (2019). Contrary to Wholecheese’s argument, the government did not forfeit 

its exhaustion argument. The government raised the defense before the district 

court, which denied Wholecheese’s motion, and subsequent motion for 

reconsideration, in part because he had not exhausted administrative remedies. 

The government then renewed its exhaustion argument on appeal.
p110543.sr2

SAT (concerns) (08/05/2011):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Related Cases: Analogs:

. Migration to groundwater: Moderate

PBT rating: P3B3T2 PMN: Health: 1-2; Eco: 2 // Incomplete

Incin Pdt: Health: 2; Eco: 3 // toxicity of incomplete

incineration products to terrestrial organisms // PMN:

P3B1T1 // Incomplete Incin Pdt: P3B3T2

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation, PFHxA Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 36 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

Page 2p110543.sr2

Page 3p110543.sr2

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 11-0543

Page 4p110543.sr2

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 11-0543

Page 6p110543.sr2

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 11-0543

Page 7p110543.sr2

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 11-0543

Page 13p110543.sr2

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 11-0543

Page 17p110543.sr2

Page 18p110543.sr2

Page 20p110543.sr2

Page 21p110543.sr2

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 11-0543

Page 22p110543.sr2

Page 23p110543.sr2

Page 24p110543.sr2

Page 25
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Signatures                                                                                                                    |   | Title                                                                                                                                    |   | Date          |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------|
|                                                                                                                          |   |                                                                                                                                     |   |          |
| /s/ Victor Chang                 Victor Chang |   | President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer) |   | June 16, 2011 |

----