FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T SEPTEMBER 8, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE U

NITED STATE S COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 15 01 6 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 1 :0 3- cr-0 00 42 -J EC-J FK-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us ANTONIO E . MOSES, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 15 05 0 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 1 :1 0- cr-0 01 64 -J EC-1
UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee,ve rs us

ANTONIO MOSES, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defen dant -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal s fr om

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e North ernDis tri ctof Ge or gi a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Sep te m be r 8, 2 01 1) Befo re TJ OFLAT, PRYOR an d F AY, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM: Ant on io Mo se s ap pe al s h is sen te nc e o f 41 m on th s o f im pr is on m en t fo r m ai l frau d, 1 8 U.S.C. § 13 41 , andm ak in g fa ls e st at em en ts , id . § 1 00 1, an d h is sen te nc e to a co ns ecu ti ve term

of 1 9 m on th s o f im

pr is on m en t fo ll owi ng th e rev oc at io n o f hi s s up erv is edrel eas e fo r hi s co nv ic ti on s i n 2 00 5 fo r co ns pi rin g t o d efraudth e Uni te d S tate s, i d. § 37 1, an d wi re fraud , id . § 1 34 3. Mo se s ar gu es th atth e d is tri ct co urt s ho ul d h av e ex cl ud edfro m it s ca lc ul at io n o f lo ss th e am ou ntof afrau du le nt lo anforwhi chRo la ndLane Jr. ap pl ie d. Mo se s al so arg ue s tha t h is sen te nc e fo r vi ol at in g h is supe rv is edrel eas e is pro cedur al ly unr eas on ab le . W e aff irm. The di stric t co urt d idno t cl earl y err b y in cl ud in g i n M os es ’s am ou ntof l os s
2th e fraudul en t l oa n fo r whi chLane ap pl ie d. Mo se s “ ai de d” or “ ab et te d” Lane in

ap pl y in g fo r th e fraudul en t l oa n “ du rin g t he co m m is si on of [ Mo se s’s] offe ns e o f co nv ic ti on , inpre pa rat io n fo r th atoff en se , or i n t he co ur se of a tt em pt in g t o avo id de te ct io n o r res po ns ib il it y forth atoff

en se .” Uni te d S ta te s Se nt en ci ng Gui de li ne s Man ua l § 1B 1.3 (a)( 1) . Mos es all owe d Lan e to us e in hi s l oa n app li cat io n fa ls e in fo rm at io n abo uthi s emplo ym en t wi th Mo se s’s s he ll co rp or at io n, At la nt a Co ns tru ct io n Gro up , andMo se s v eri fie d t ha t fa ls e in fo rm at io n abo utLane ’s pu rp orte d e m

pl oym en t wh enqu eri edby the len de r. Offic er J anMo se s ex am in ed lo anap pl ic at io ns fil edby Mos es an d d et erm in edth athe ha d u se d t he same fals e in fo rm at io n t o app ly for atlea sttwo lo an s an d t o o bt ai n a t l eas t o ne lo anan d 1 3 li ne s o f cre di t. Mo se s’s s en te nc e fo r vi ol at in g h is supe rv is edrel eas e is pro cedur al ly reas on ab le . The d is tri ctco urt co ns id eredth e se nt en ci ng fact or s an d fo un d tha t Mo se s’s co nduc t was “ ve ry ser io us ,” hi s ac ti on s “ sh ow[ ed ] no wil li ng ne ss an d n o in cl in at io n t o e ve r ch an ge ,” th athi s “ sc he m es ” p os eda “ dang er t o o ur eco no m ic syste m an d t o tho se who rel y

on th e p ers on ’s ho ne st y ,” an d “ th e o nl y way to pr ot ectpe op le is to ke ep [hi m ] in jail lo ng er.” Se e 1 8 U.S.C. § 35 53 (a). Mo se s co m pl ai ns th atth e d is tri ctco urt d idno t ad dr es s the ne edto pro vi de educ at io na l o r vo cat io na l trai ni ng or t o a vo idun warrant edsen te nc in g d is pa rit ie s, i d. § 335 53 (a)( 4) , (a)(6 ), bu t “ [t]he di st ric t co urt n eedno t s ta te onth e rec or d tha t i t h as

ex pl ic it ly con si de redeachfact oran d n eedno t d is cu ss each fact or ,” Uni te d S ta te s v. Do rm an , 48 8 F .3d93 6, 9 38 (11 th Cir . 20 07 ). The d is tri ctco urt p ro vi de d a su ffi ci en t ex pl an at io n fo r it s s en te nc e. W e AFFIRMMo se s’s s en te nc es .

4