alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[4910-13-PI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 IDocket No. FAA-2010-0177j Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-222-AD; Amendme 

# 1(0'1q .;l.Olb- 

## tLJ.-Dtf 39-*****; AD

###  -** -**1 RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-243, -341, -342, and -343 Airplanes; Model A340-541 and -642 Airplanes; Equipped with Rolls-Royce Trent 500 and Tr 700 Series Engines AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTranSpOliation (DOT). ACTiON: Finalmle. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products Ii above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness mfonnatioll (MeAl originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct anunsa~' condition on an aviation product. The MeAldescribes the unsafe condition as: Ithas been evidenced by test that the tightening torque settings onthe Rolls Royce Trent 500 and Trent 700 fo!Ward(FWD) and aft (AFT) engine mount linkpin retention bolts have always been higher than the design value. These bolts retain the washers that maintain the engine mount ve11icalload pins inposition. Ifbolts, as aconsequence ofthe over-torque, fail and move away, itwould lead to loss ofthe vert1calload pins, which could result in loss orlhe primary and/or secondary loadpath ofthe forward and/or aft engine mount which could potentially lead to engine separation. 11OJT••••• SnOlIO •• 

# c·~
4 ~1-1"-1 

# ."J:J[~",- ft IS,ID

ROUnNGSV •• !IO\.



## * * 

## * 

## * * * *

FAA Form 1360·14.1 (6-89) OFFICIAL FILE COPY 

## * u.s. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1995 769-211
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 29, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-16-00568-CR

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL DUPUY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 405th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13CR1365

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for 

abuse of official capacity. The State filed a motion to adjudicate. The trial court 

signed an order releasing appellant on personal bond and imposing certain bond 

conditions. Appellant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus challenging the 

bond order. The trial court denied the application. Appellant filed a notice of 

appeal from the denial of his application for habeas corpus. That appeal was 

assigned to this court and docketed as appeal number 14-16-00568-CR.
2

On August 5, 2016, the trial court granted the State’s motion to adjudicate 

and signed a judgment adjudicating guilt. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from 

that judgment. The appeal was assigned to this court and docketed as appeal 

number 14-16-00683-CR.

The judgment adjudicating guilt renders the issue of pretrial bond moot. See 

Ex parte Morgan, 335 S.W.2d 766, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960); Ex parte Bennet, 

818 S.W.2d 199, 200 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no pet.) (stating that 

“where the premise of a habeas corpus application is destroyed by subsequent 

developments, the legal issues raised thereunder are rendered moot.”). 

Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal as moot. Appeal number 14-16-

00683-CR remains pending. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, McCally, and Wise.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner, v. Eduardo VAZQUEZ, Respondent.

No. 88SC412.

Supreme Court of Colorado.

Feb. 20, 1990.

ORDER OF COURT

Upon consideration of the Record on Appeal, together with the Written and Oral Arguments of Counsel, and now being sufficiently advised in the premises,

IT IS THIS DAY ORDERED that the Writ of Certiorari heretofore granted be, and is, DENIED as having been improvidently granted.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 00 4 1 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 - CE - 0 5 3 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 866 

To make improvements to the transitional program for covered business 

method patents, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2013 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To make improvements to the transitional program for 

covered business method patents, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patent Quality Im5 provement Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO TRANSITIONAL PROGRAM FOR 

7 COVERED BUSINESS METHOD PATENTS. 

8 Section 18 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act 

9 (35 U.S.C. 321 note) is amended— 

10 (1) by striking subsection (a)(3); and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 866 IS

1 (2) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ‘‘a financial 

2 product or’’ and inserting ‘‘an enterprise, product, 

3 or’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Imgest Finance Establishment, Respondent, v Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.), entered November 15, 1990, which found in favor of petitioner in the sum of $1,001,391.18, upon confirmation of an award in arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Petitioner obtained an arbitration award against its broker, the respondent, for executing improper option trades. When petitioner sought confirmation of the award, respondent cross-moved to vacate the award on the ground of fraud. Specifically, respondent contends that petitioner concealed the fact that its money manager, Pelligrinelli, was also a money manager for another company, Pecon, S.A., which traded through the brokerage house Refco Securities, and that Pelligrinelli had testified in an arbitration proceeding on behalf of Pecon that he had been relying on Refco’s investment advice. The court denied the cross-motion and confirmed the arbitration award, finding that the parties and issues were different in both cases and that respondent failed to establish any meaningful inconsistencies in the testimony of petitioner’s witness or any evidence of fraud.

To vacate an arbitration award on the ground of fraud, a party must establish by clear and convincing evidence the existence of fraud, that the fraud would not have been discoverable upon exercise of due diligence prior to or during the arbitration, and that the fraud materially related to an issue in arbitration *(Dogherra v Safeway Stores,*679 F2d 1293, *cert denied*459 US 990). Respondent has not met this burden. Respondent was aware of the existence of other clients and made no effort to seek the information it now claims was concealed. Nor was the information material, since it appears that the damage award was based on a finding, demonstrable by documentary evidence, that the last order should have *292been canceled before execution. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Asch and Smith, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 8.1**

 

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

 
| **Subsidiaries**                      | ** ** | **Jurisdiction**       |
|---------------------------------------|------------|------------------------|
| Andina Inversiones Societarias S.A.   |       | Chile                  |
| Andina Bottling  Investments Dos S.A. |       | Chile                  |
| Andina Bottling  Investments S.A.     |       | Chile                  |
| Servicios Multivending  Ltda.         |       | Chile                  |
| Transportes Andina  Refrescos Ltda.   |       | Chile                  |
| Vital Aguas S.A.                      |       | Chile                  |
| Vital S.A.                            |       | Chile                  |
| Rio de Janeiro Refrescos Ltda.        |       | Brazil                 |
| Embotelladora del Atlántico S.A. |       | Argentina              |
| Abisa Corp.                           |       | British Virgin Islands |
| RJR Investments Corp.                 |       | British Virgin Islands |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-1 of SEEC, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on July 18, 2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned , in the
capacities and dates listed below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date:  July 18, 2003                         /s/    RAVINDRA KOKA
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                                 Ravindra Koka
                                 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



Vadim Mats, Chief Financial Officer of Point Capital, Inc.
(the “Registrant”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant
for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.



Date: May 15, 2015





|By: | /s/ Vadim Mats                                                                    | 
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Vadim Mats

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.97 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, December Employee of the Month, Russ Garzon

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report.
 Date:  August 4, 2011
    /s/ EDWARD H. ROSSEdward H. RossChairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ CARY L. SCHAEFERCary L. SchaeferChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,288,343
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      337,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5,159
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,974,987
<PP&E>                                           3,500,870
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,166,421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,353,003
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              805,881
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           175,204
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,371,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,353,003
<SALES>                                              5,208
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,697,367
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,890,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,032,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    24,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,058,865)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,058,865)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,058,865)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.61)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 851 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 851

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend to all veterans with a 
  serious service-connected injury eligibility to participate in the 
                   family caregiver services program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2013

  Mr. Sanders introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend to all veterans with a 
  serious service-connected injury eligibility to participate in the 
                   family caregiver services program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Caregivers Expansion and Improvement 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION TO ALL VETERANS WITH A SERIOUS SERVICE-CONNECTED 
              DISABILITY OF ELIGIBILITY FOR PARTICIPATION IN FAMILY 
              CAREGIVER PROGRAM.

    Section 1720G(a)(2)(B) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ``on or after September 11, 2001''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                    DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS INCORPORATED
 
 STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
                   (THOUSAND'S EXCEPT FOR PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                                  -------------------------------
                                                                   1995        1996        1997
                                                                   ----        ----        ----
<S>                                                               <C>         <C>         <C>
Net Income (Loss)...........................................      $ (377)     $1,236      $   633
                                                                  ======      ======      =======
Weighted average common shares outstanding..................       6,071       7,620        9,192
Dilutive effect of common equivalent shares of stock options          --          --          608
  and warrants..............................................
Additional shares pursuant to SAB83 computation.............       2,201       2,204        1,086
                                                                  ------      ------      -------
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share of            8,272       9,824       10,886
  common stock..............................................
                                                                  ======      ======      =======
Net income (loss) per share of common stock.................      $(0.05)     $ 0.13      $  0.06
                                                                  ======      ======      =======
</TABLE>
----

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the period presented. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Alan Chen                                                         |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Alan Chen                                                             |   |
|   | Title: | Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director |   |
|   | Date:  | March 22, 2014                                                        |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3985 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3985

  To amend the Federal Rules of Evidence with respect to the rule of 
                       privileges in civil cases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 1994

  Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Rules of Evidence with respect to the rule of 
                       privileges in civil cases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That rule 501 of the 
Federal Rules of Evidence is amended by inserting ``and in civil 
actions under section 1979 of the Revised Statutes of the United States 
(42 U.S.C. 1983),'' after ``rule of decision''.

                                 <all>
```