alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cardo Medical, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew A. Brooks, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to  §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Andrew A. Brooks
                      Andrew A. BrooksChief Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  March 31, 2010

---
ex10_12.htm


Exhibit 10.12












2014 INCENTIVE PLAN FOR CERTAIN KEY EMPLOYEES







The Company has a discretionary annual incentive program under which exempt salaried employees may earn cash payments based on a percentage of base annual salary.  The actual percent is based on a variety of guidelines including performance levels of the respective business units primarily measured by operating income subject to certain adjustments.







The payment to an employee is based upon (i) their assigned grade level, (ii) actual company earnings achieved relative to a pre-determined target, which is adjusted upward if company performance exceeds target and reduced if company performance is less than target, and (iii) base salary paid during the fiscal year.
#### Shirley Pines, Respondent, v Muss Development Company, Inc., Defendant, and Westinghouse Elevator Co., Inc., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Title.)

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Westinghouse Elevator Co., Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), dated October 17, 1989, as granted its motion to strike the plaintiffs supplemental bill of particulars in its entirety only to the extent of striking the provision thereof claiming medical special damages.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by refusing to strike that portion of the plaintiffs supplemental bill of particulars which itemized damages for lost earnings. While a supplemental bill of particulars may not be used to claim a "wholly new category of special damages” *(Pearce v Booth Mem. Hosp.,*152 AD2d 553, 554) not previously asserted *(see,*CPLR 3043 [b]), the plaintiffs 1985 bill of particulars and 1987 amended bill of particulars fully set forth the elements supporting her loss of earnings claim. Under these circumstances, the plaintiff was properly permitted to assert a claim for damages based on continuing loss of earnings in her supplemental bill of particulars *(see, March v St. Volodymyr Ukranian Catholic Church,*117 AD2d 864; *O’Neill v Schlessinger,*86 AD2d 842; *cf., Kurnitz v Croft,*91 AD2d 972). Lawrence, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Spectrum Technical Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by references to such financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                     106,460,248
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,498,964<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             114,822,056<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               114,822,056<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,025,066<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,123,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,901,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         15,901,317
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,901,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include subscriptions receivable of $5,117,123 and
interest receivable of $381,841.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $2,533,889 and net option premiums of $328,955.
<F3>Liabilities include accrued brokerage commissions of $776,253,
redemptions payable of $683,809, and accrued management fees of
$376,365.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $26,334,748, net
change in unrealized of ($1,552,659) and interest income of $3,242,977.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4123

A bill to extend certain provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 23, 1994

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

A bill to extend certain provisions of the Marine Mammal

Protection Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 114(a)(1) of the Marine Mammal Protection

4 Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1383a(a)(1)), is amended by strik5 ing ‘‘April 1, 1994,’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘April

6 1, 1999,’’.

Æ
#### In the Matter of Ernestina Alexander, Appellant, v Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying petitioner’s motion for an order permitting her to commence an action against respondent Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation. We conclude from our review of the record that petitioner timely filed a notice of intention to make a claim within 90 days after being notified that an insurer had disclaimed coverage and after petitioner had made "timely reasonable efforts” to ascertain insurance coverage (Insurance Law § 5208 [a] [3] [A] [iij; [former (B)]; *cf, Pajak v MVAIC,*155 AD2d 912). *Sain v Forrest*(130 AD2d 733), relied upon by Supreme Court in denying petitioner’s motion, is not applicable to the circumstances in this case. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Kings County, Shaw, J.—Late Notice of Claim.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
----

STATE AID — ITALY

State aid No C 5/2005 (ex NN 70/2004) — Exemption from excise duty on agricultural fuels — following the initiation of the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) of the Treaty (aid C 6/2004 — ex NN 70/2001) — Article 24(3) of Law No 388 of 23 December 2000, Article 13(3) of Law No 448 of 21 December 2001, Article 19(4) of Law No 289 of 27 December 2002 and Article 2(4) of Law No 350 of 24 December 2003

Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty

(2005/C 101/04)

By means of the letter dated 19 January 2005, reproduced in the authentic language on the pages following this summary, the Commission notified Italy of its decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty concerning the abovementioned aid.

Interested parties may submit their comments on the measure in respect of which the Commission is initiating the procedure within one month of the date of publication of this summary and the following letter, to:

These comments will be communicated to Italy. Confidential treatment of the identity of the interested party submitting the comments may be requested in writing, stating the reasons for the request.

SUMMARY

Article 24(3) of Law No 388 of 23 December 2000, Article 13(3) of Law No 448 of 21 December 2001, Article 19(4) of Law No 289 of 27 December 2002 and Article 2(4) of Law No 350 of 24 December 2003 all provide for full exemption from excise duty on fuel used to heat glasshouses in Italy.

Evaluation

At this stage, the Commission has doubts regarding the compatibility with the common market of this full exemption, which supplements that already granted to the same beneficiaries under aid C 6/2004, for the following reasons:

TEXT OF LETTER

Procedimento

Descrizione

Fondamento giuridico

Informazioni complementari fornite dalle autorità italiane

Argomentazioni sviluppate dalle autorità italiane nell'ambito del fascicolo C 6/04, in risposta all'apertura del procedimento di cui all'articolo 88, paragrafo 2 del trattato nei confronti dell'aiuto previsto dall'articolo 5, comma 5 del decreto legge 30 settembre 2000, n. 268

Riesame

Esistenza di aiuti di Stato e aspetto fiscale della materia — compatibilità con il mercato comune

Autorizzazione ai sensi delle direttive 92/81/CEE e 2003/96/CE.

----

(1)  Vedi lettera SG-Greffe (2004) D/200646.

(2)  Documento AGR 15202 del 10.6.2004

(3)GU L 316 del 31.10.1992, pag. 12.

(4)GU L 283 du 31.10.2003, pag. 51.

(5)GU L 316 del 31.10.1992, pag. 12.

(6)GU L 283 del 31.10.2003, pag. 51.

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PERIOD REPORT





I, Harry E. Sloan, Chief Executive Officer of Global Eagle Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 27, 2011
/s/ Harry E. SloanHarry E. SloanChief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of CBC Acquisition Corp. 1 (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chi Wu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Chi WuChi Wu

Principal Financial Officer

August 22, 2011
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1246-18

LYDIA METCALF, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

PANOLA COUNTY

KEEL, J., filed a concurring opinion.

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur in the majority’s judgment; the evidence was legally insufficient to

convict Appellant as a party to her husband’s sexual assault of her daughter. Viewed in

the light most favorable to the conviction, the evidence would not have authorized a

rational jury to find that Appellant acted with the intent to promote or assist the

commission of an offense against her daughter. See TEX. PENAL CODE § 7.02(a). But I

disagree with the majority’s suggestion that the State had to prove that Appellant intended
Metcalf concurrence–Page 2

to promote or assist the specific offense committed by her husband. The State did not

bear that burden because of the law of transferred intent.

A person is criminally responsible for causing a result if the only difference

between what happened and what she desired, contemplated, or risked is that a different

offense was committed. TEX. PENAL CODE § 6.04(b)(1). Thus, if a defendant intends to

promote or assist the commission of one crime, but her co-defendant commits a different

crime, that difference does not shield her from party liability.

So, in this case if the evidence had shown that Appellant acted with the intent to

promote or assist her husband’s commission of one type of sexual assault, but he actually

committed a different type of sexual assault, the difference between what she intended to

promote or assist and what he actually did would not have shielded her from liability; she

still would have been guilty of sexual assault, provided that the other elements of party

liability were met. See TEX. PENAL CODE §§ 6.04(b)(1), 7.02(a).

To the extent that the majority opinion suggests that Appellant had to act with the

intent to promote or assist a particular sexual assault, I disagree. Consequently, I concur

only in the majority’s judgment.

Filed: April 1, 2020

Publish
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.82 MB)

Tags:DSCC, DLA Land & Maritime, Navy Rear Adm. John King, Jim McClaugherty, DLA Land and Maritime Commander, DLA Land and Maritime Deputy Commander, dla, columbus, EVENT, People and Culture

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.38 MB)

Tags:DLA Aviation, Air Force Lt. Gen. Andy Busch, DLA Director, Captains of Industry, Clothing & Textiles, Repair Parts, dla, Strategic engagement, 3D PRINTING, Defense Logistics Agency, AIR FORCE

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
2023667346* OSTW85-121-XEWCP24 01:53:20 p.m. 

810-111201-022 

MICHAEL H. MICHAUD 

WASHINGTON OFP!Ce 

1724 L<:K'y-wtf'M H\^gst CV'ICE BVUCI^: 

W'rH'h^i<it..0C20SIS 

P'isi.. i:02!22$63C< 

F M (2a2)»5-2943 

iiWAir.nitt>iaud hoino.tiov 

(Cumjr^sfi nf tlii> United 0tatcB 

IQufiliiUQtim, DC 211313 

December 1,2011 

VETEIIAN*' AFFAIMS 

THANWOMTATION AHO iNFRAttitucTiira; 

Sjoco-."ri :r.v 11. Hua 'Aiivii •vj rr/i.-jPi/juc: Bu^oiMS* Via 

Eh'ffP'xo M'^*MS»MKrr 

SHAL L BuaiNnt 

ENICPN>AtKi-JWSH1* 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

> 

en 

I wanted to thank you for your agency's commitment to ensuring that the carrier that it selects to 

provide replacement essential air service in Presque Isle is able to meet the needs of the 

community. 

As you know, there are concerns that relying on smaller planes to provide service to Presque Isle 

could have a devastating effect on the airport and the region. Smaller aircraft would have to stop 

between Presque Isle and their final destination, increasing travel times and opportunities for 

delays. Additionally, there are concerns that these smaller planes might not be appropriate for 

severe winter weatiier conditions in the region. 

Individuals and businesses throughout northern Maine depend on the service provided by the 

Northem Mune Regional Airport. As the economy continues to recover, they cannot afford to 

lose access to the rest of the country. It is essential that any carrier providing essential air service 

to Presque Isle do so safely and efficiently while meeting the needs of the region. 

I appreciate your time and your continued support of air service in rural areas. I am confident 

that we can ensure that Presque Isle continues to receive the level of service necessary to meet its 

needs. 

O : ? 

=;'oQ 

o ; 

Sincerely, 

^U/^^ji ^ 

Michael H. Michaud 

Member of Congress 

•ANGOK: 

B.'.w^, Mir044P1 

s*. tjo'iwa-s'jiif 

LCWI*T«N: 

$79 L.iMnM ST»ifcT, OwyiNL- F.; 

l.«.YifPVN. Kir 04240 

p>.-»» cnT.ni-iToi 

•.r^S»p . 

PRElOtltlSLC : 

44!- LV n ST» ~ r 

Pwv.tT In r. ME n4'/>;'l 

Fi> (7.171 764-i:)llO 

WATCRVULCi 

16 Cww s 5t*t.Lr 

W'TciMut. MEM90 1 

Pi.c'.i'(207ia7].a7U 

F..(2or)a7i.s?i7
**
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2019 (the“Report”) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, BRUCE J. SPOHLER, the Co-Chief Executive Officer ofthe Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 
  
/s/ BRUCE J. SPOHLER
**Name:**  **Bruce J. Spohler****Date:**  **November 4, 2019****