alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 15, 2011 | /s/ Seng Leong Lee                   |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                  | Seng Leong Lee                       |
|                  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

----
catm_Ex10_61


		
			Exhibit 10.61
		

		
			 
		

		
			Cardtronics, Inc.
SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
(As of December 31, 2015) 
		

		
			 
		

		
			The 2015 compensation paid to our non-employee directors consisted of:
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			an annual award of restricted stock, valued at approximately $130,000 at the time of grant;




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			an annual cash retainer of $60,000, with no additional fees paid for Board and committee meetings attended;




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			an annual cash retainer of $75,000 for the Chairman of the Board;




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			an annual cash retainer of $10,000 for each committee of which the director is a member,; and 




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000 for the chair of the Audit, Finance, and Compensation Committee,  and an additional annual cash retainer of $5,000 for the chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee.
#### People v Christine LaFleur, Defendant.

Motion to extend time to take appeal denied. Memorandum: Counsel has complied with 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a) *(see, People v Usher,*172 AD2d 1075 [decided herewith]). Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1:

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Hudson Technologies, Inc.

Pearl River, New York

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-17133, No. 333-38598, No. 333-129057 and No. 333-164650) and Form S-3 (No. 333-151973) of Hudson Technologies, Inc. of our report dated March 7, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/ BDO USA, LLP



|Valhalla New York
|-----------------
|March 7, 2011
Additional RIA Files - Ch. 5 to Follow 

 12/15/2011 06:51 PM 

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US 

 

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. 

Leader, Energy Strategies Group 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

 

Phone: (919) 541-1045 

Cell: (919) 306-2290 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

********************************************************* 

DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Chapter 1_IntroductionBackground_1215.doc 

Chapter 2_ElectricPowerSectorProfile_1215.doc 

Chapter 3_CostEconomicEnergy_1215.docx 

Chapter 8_SummaryofCostsandBenefits_1215.doc
|   | (1) | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Native American Energy Group, Inc. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 15, 2011       | /s/ Joseph G. D’Arrigo |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|                                                     | Joseph G. D’Arrigo     |
|                                                     | Chief Executive Officer      |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 29, 2014

d0721

Order 

Clerk

July 29, 2014

147941(40)

MICHAEL CHARLES WARD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 147941

COA: 310968

Macomb CC: 2011-003446-AH

CARSON CITY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

WARDEN, PAROLE BOARD, and

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s January 31, 

2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the quarterly report of Neutra Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Sydney Jim, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date: June 14, 2019BY: /s/ Sydney JimSydney JimPresident, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Sole Director  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Behlin, Appellant.

Motion by the appellant *pro se,*denominated as one for reargument and for a writ of error coram nobis, to vacate a decision and order of this court dated October 26, 1987, which determined an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), rendered November 11, 1985 *(see, People v Behlin,*133 AD2d 835).

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied.

Since the defendant makes no challenge to this court’s determination of those issues which were raised on his direct appeal, his motion is not properly one for reargument *(cf., People v Bachert,*69 NY2d 593, 597). Moreover, since he points to no argument which appellate counsel could have raised but unreasonably failed to raise on direct appeal, the defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745; *People v Wilson,*150 AD2d 631). To the extent that the defendant now raises issues which were properly the subject of his unsuccessful motion for vacatur of the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10, since he did not obtain leave to appeal from denial of that motion, those arguments are not properly before this court *(see, People v Kihm,*143 AD2d 199). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.77 MB)

Tags:CFC, Chili Cook Off, DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, DLA Distribution Headquarters, dla, combined federal campaign, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Toggle Navigation
        Toggle Search
        
        Defense Information Systems Agency
        Please enter only alphanumeric characters
                
                Facebook
                    Twitter
                    Youtube
                    LinkedIn About Toggle Submenu
			  Our Work / DISA 101
				  Our Leaders
				  Our Strategic Plan
				  Our History
				  DISA Policy/Issuances
				  Fact Sheets
				  Industry Partners
				  Contact Us
			News and Events Toggle Submenu
			  News
				  Events
				  Training
				  Media Resources
			Services and Capabilities News & Events
        
        
          
            Media Resources
 Print
                    Share
                    Subscribe
 News
        
                Events
            
                Training
            
                Media Resources
 Media Inquiries Contact Public Affairs ▸
 MEDIA RESOURCES
 Advisories
    Agency Snapshot
    DISA Capabilities Brochure
    Our Organization Structure
    Fact Sheets
    Leadership
    Contact Public Affairs
 Our Work
    Our Leaders
    Our Organization Structure
    Our History
    Small Business Programs
    Issuances/Policy
    **News & Events**
    News
    Events
    Training
    Media Resources
                        **Careers at DISA**
    Employment Opportunities
    Learning and Development
    New Employees
    New Military Employees
    Quality of Work Life
    Recruiting Events
    SDC Recruitment
    Search for Opportunities
    WHCA Recruitment
                        ****Legal & Regulatory****
    Accessibility Notice
    Data Rights/Intellectual Property
    FOIA
    Inspector General
    Inventories & Schedules
    Linking Policy
    No Fear Act
    Privacy Impact Assessments
    Privacy Office
    Security/Privacy
    Whistleblower
            **Defense Information Systems Agency**
                        
                        Contact Us
                    Subscribe to DISA email updates:
                        Email
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

ANTHONY LEROY JONES , § § No. 08

- 1 4

- 00 105

- C R Appellant, § Appeal from the
V. § 297th District Court
of Tarrant County, Texas THE STATE OF TEXAS , § § (TC# 1297281D ) Appellee. §
MEMORANDUM OPINION Anthony Leroy Jones appeals h is conviction of robbery, enhanced by two prior felony
convictions . Appellant was charged with aggravated robbery, but he entered a plea of guilty to the lesser included offense of robbery before a jury and the trial court conducted a unitary proceeding

. T EX .C ODE C RIM .P ROC .A NN
. art. 26.14 (West 2009) ; see Frame v. State , 615 S.W.2d 766, 767 (Tex.Crim.App. 1981) . The jury fo und Appellant guilty, found the enhancement paragraphs true, and assessed his punishment at imprisonment for a term of sixty
years. We affirm.
FRIVOLOUS APPEAL Appellant ’ s court

- appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.- 2

-

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) , by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be
advanced. See In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403, 40 6 n.9 (Tex.Crim.App. 2008) (“In Texas, an
Anders brief need not specifically advance ‘arguable’ points of error if counsel finds none, but it must provide record references to the facts and pro cedural history and set out pertinent legal authorities.”); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978)

. Counsel has notified the Court in writing that he has delivered a copy of counsel ’ s brief and the motion to withdraw to Appellant, and he has advised Appellant of his right to review the record, file a pro se brief , and to seek discretionary review

. Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 318

- 20 (Tex.Crim.App. 2014) (setting forth duties of counsel). Appellant has been provided access to the appellate record, but he has informed the Court he does not wish to file a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief , and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court

.

April 2 2 , 2016 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice
Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ. (Do Not Publish)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.4 MB)

Tags:freedom, war fighters, war fighting, flexible, worldwide, on watch, preserve peace, deter aggression, defend freedom, operate forward, commerce, sea lanes, war fighting first, NMCS, navy media content service, Liberty, Fast, Protect, Be Ready, chinfo, America , United States , Sailors, U.S. Navy, tradition, Navy , Deployed, Heritage, MILITARY

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6290

DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARY ANN SAAR, Acting Secretary, D.P.S.C.S.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA03-517-8-PJM)

Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 2, 2004

Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Gloria Wilson Shelton,

Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pearson v.

Saar, No. CA-03-517-8-PJM (D. Md. Jan. 29, 2004). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Readily Biodegradability

Sanitized
FILED

September 3, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

MAY SESSION, 1998

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9709-CC-00390

)

Appellee, )

)

) MAURY COUNTY

VS. )

) HON. JIM T. HAMILTON

VINCENT WALKER, ) JUDGE

)

Appellant. ) (Direct Appeal)

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

SHARA FLACY JOHN KNOX WALKUP

District Public Defender Attorney General and Reporter

128 North 2nd St.

Pulaski, TN 38478 LISA A. NAYLOR

Assistant Attorney General

425 Fifth Avenue North

Nashville, TN 37243-0493

MIKE BOTTOMS

District Attorney General

P. O. Box 459

Lawrenceburg, TN 38464

OPINION FILED ________________________

AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20

JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE
-2-

OPINION

On January 6, 1997, the trial court issued a community corrections

violation warrant for failure to pay court costs, fines, supervision fees, and

maintain employment. On May 5, 1997, a second revocation warrant was

issued, this time for aggravated robbery. On June 2, 1997, the trial court

revoked Appellant’s community corrections placement and imposed his

original sentence of incarceration.

After a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court

pursuant to Court of Criminal Appeals Rule 20.

Appellant raises the following issues on appeal: Whether the trial court

should have waited to rule on the second warrant until Appellant was tried for

the charge, and whether there is substantial evidence to support the trial

court’s decision to revoke Appellant’s probation.

“The court shall also possess the power to revoke the sentence

imposed at any time due to the conduct of the defendant.” Tenn. Code Ann. §

40-36-106(e)(4) The trial court did not have to wait until Appellant was tried for

the aggravated robbery charge before revoking community corrections.

The decision to revoke community corrections is entrusted to the sound

discretion of the trial court who may revoke a defendant’s placement in such a

program if a violation of the terms and conditions thereof is established by a

preponderance of the evidence. State v. Harkin, 811 S.W.2d 79, 82 (Tenn.
-3-

1991). There is no requirement that the trial judge wait for a criminal

conviction to occur when a violation is brought to his or her attention and is

established by a preponderance of evidence.

The testimony of Juanita Stewart, that Appellant was the robber she

saw and the testimony of Appellant’s community corrections officer, that

Appellant violated the terms of his placement in community corrections

provide ample basis to revoke Appellant’s com munity corrections placem ent.

Pursuant to Court of Criminal Appeals Rule 20 the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed for the above stated reasons.

____________________________________

JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE

CONCUR:

___________________________________

GARY R. WADE, PRESIDING JUDGE

___________________________________

DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE
<page>			     		  EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Global Balanced L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Lee
Horwitz, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge:
  (1)	  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
   	  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)	  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and
     results of operations of the Partnership.






By:	  /s/	Lee Horwitz

Name:		Lee Horwitz
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 8, 2007



-