alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Section 2: EX-31.1
|------------------



Exhibit 31.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



I, Michael T. Moe, certify that:



1. I have reviewed
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GSV Capital Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant’s
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this
report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant’s
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting.



Dated this 7th day of November
2012.



|By: |  | /s/Michael T. Moe                             
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|    |  | Michael T. Moe
        Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Michael S. Gross, Chief Executive Officer of
Solar Senior Capital Ltd., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Solar Senior Capital Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this day of November 1, 2011



|                        
|------------------------
|/S/     MICHAEL S.
GROSS
|Michael S. Gross
Exhibit 13

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the annual report on Form 20-F of Nokia Corporation (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby
certify that to the best of our knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                      |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/ RAJEEV SURI     
|                     |  | Name:                |  | RAJEEV SURI                          
|                     |  | Title:               |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     | 
|Date: March 23, 2017 |  | /s/ KRISTIAN PULLOLA
|                     |  | Name:                |  | KRISTIAN PULLOLA                     
|                     |  | Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7288

KEITH EARL GODWIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT H. ANDERSON, III, Assistant Attorney

General; E. EVERETT BAGNELL, Judge; E. PRESTON

GRISSOM, Judge,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-958)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Earl Godwin, Appellant Pro Se. Maryann Shea, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Godwin

v. Anderson, No. CA-95-958 (E.D. Va. July 14, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

November 13, 2012

 

Via EDGAR

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

Judiciary Plaza

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Re:                             Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VOC Energy Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)                                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|     |     | The   Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., |
|----------|----------|----------------------------------------------------|
|     |     | Trustee   for VOC Energy Trust                     |
|     |     |                                               |
|     |     | By:                                                | /s/   MIKE ULRICH |
|     |     |                                               | Mike   Ulrich |
| * * | * * | * *                                           | *Vice President and Trust Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Annual Report of Miller Industries, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William G.
Miller, Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 26, 2004

| | /s/ William G. Miller                                                    | 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
| |                                                                          | 
| | William G. Miller
  Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer | 

---

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 (the “Report”) of New Mountain Finance Corporation  (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Adam B. Weinstein, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
|      | /s/ Adam B. Weinstein      |
|-----------|----------------------------|
| **Name:** | **Adam B. Weinstein**      |
| **Date:** | **November 14, 2011** |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10536]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that a certain object to be included in the exhibition “Enrico David: Gradations of Slow Release,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago, Illinois, from on or about September 29, 2018, until on or about March 10, 2019, and at the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, Washington, District of Columbia, from on or about April 18, 2019, until on or about September 2, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State,L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000.                

Marie Therese Porter Royce,

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-19715 Filed 9-10-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-K of Security Bank Corporation (the Company) for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), H. Averett Walker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James R. McLemore, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ H. Averett WalkerH. AVERETT WALKERChief Executive OfficerMarch 5, 2004/s/ James R. McLemoreJAMES R. McLEMOREChief Financial and Accounting OfficerMarch 5, 2004




This certification accompanies
this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Clyde Doggett, Also Known as Clyde Doggitt, Appellant, v Martin Levy, as Warden of the Penitentiary of the City of New York, Rikers Island, Respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Burton Hecht, J.), entered November 21, 1989, dismissing petitioner Clyde Doggitt’s *pro se*writ of habeas corpus, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although petitioner contends that Justice Hecht should not have heard the petition since Justice Hecht previously set bail, petitioner waived this contention as he never requested that the petition be referred to another Justice (CPLR 4017). Further, this argument has no merit as CPLR 7002 (b) (5) does not proscribe the same Justice who originally set bail from reviewing the petition for a writ. Also, petitioner’s contention that Justice Hecht did not address the issue of whether bail was excessive is without merit. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Cannavest Corp. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2014 (the “Report”),
I, Allen Shubat, Secretary and Treasurer of the Registrant, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) the Report, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and



(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                    |    
|------------------- | ---
|Dated: May 15, 2014 | By:
|                    |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the Company) on
Form l0-K for the year ended January 6, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C.J. Gabriel, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the report.

Date:
December 18, 2008



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ C.J. Gabriel, Jr.                               
|Name: C.J. Gabriel, Jr. Its: Chief Executive Officer
#### BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, State of Colorado, Petitioner-Appellee, v. S. Crawford DUHON, M.D., Respondent-Appellant.

No. 92CA1009.

Colorado Court- of Appeals, Div. C.

Dec. 3, 1992.

Gale A. Norton, Atty. Gen., Raymond T. Slaughter, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Timothy M. Tymkovich, Sol. Gen., William J. *1313Higgins, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for petitioner-appellee.

Sheila H. Meer, P.C., Sheila H. Meer, Denver, for respondent-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

In this action to enforce an administrative subpoena against S. Crawford Duhon, M.D., the Board of Medical Examiners has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for laek of jurisdiction. We deny the motion.

The Board commenced these proceedings in the district court pursuant to § 12-36-104(l)(b), C.R.S. (1991 Repl.Vol. 5B) to enforce a subpoena issued by it. The only relief requested by the Board was an order enforcing the subpoena, and the issuance of such an order by the court disposed of all matters pending before that court in those proceedings.

The Board contends that the order enforcing its subpoena is not final in that no final agency action has occurred nor has any final order entered in a special statutory proceeding. Contrary to the Board’s arguments, we conclude that the order constitutes a final judgment of a district court within the meaning of C.A.R. 1(a)(1).

Enforcement of the Board’s subpoena is a special statutory proceeding similar to the proceedings to enforce subpoenas issued by the Department of Revenue that were at issue in *Charnes v. DiGiacomo,*200 Colo. 94, 612 P.2d 1117 (1980). *Compare*§ 39-21-112(3), C.R.S. (1982 Repl.Vol. 16B) *with*§ 12 — 36—104(l)(b), C.R.S. (1991 Repl.Vol. 5B). In both instances, the organic statute of the agency provides for the agency to obtain enforcement of its subpoenas in the district court. In *Chames,*it was held that the district court order in the enforcement proceeding is ap-pealable pursuant to C.A.R. 1.

*People v. District Court,*164 Colo. 385, 435 P.2d 374 (1968) is inappropriate to the issue raised here. The only order issued in that case was an order quashing the subpoena, but granting leave to reserve the respondent. Unlike an order enforcing a subpoena, an order to quash, because it does not dispose of the proceedings, does not constitute a final judgment. *Hoen v. District Court,*159 Colo. 451, 412 P.2d 428 (1966).

Hence, we conclude that we have jurisdiction over this cause. *Cf. Colorado State Board of Nursing v. Bethesda Psychiatric Hospital,*809 P.2d 1051 (Colo.App.1990) (enforcement proceeding under § 12-38-120(7), C.R.S. (1991 Repl.Vol. 5B)).

The motion is denied.

CRISWELL, HUME and ROTHENBERG, JJ., concur.