AMENDED FINAL CLOSE OUT REPORT 

PALMER BARGE LINE SUPERFUND SITE 

PORT ARTHUR, JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS 

EPA ID# TXD068104561 

. REGION 6 
CONCURRENCE PAGE 

AMENDED FINAL CLOSE OUT REPORT 

PALMER BARGE LINE SUPERFUND SITE 

EPA ID# TXD068104561 

Rafae Casanova, P.G., RemedIal Project Manager 

ompton, Office of Regional Counsel, Superfund Branch 

Carlos Sanchez, Chief, Arkansas/Texa ection 

[74~~~ . Donald Williams, Deputy Associate Director, Superfund Division 

Charles Faultry, Associate Direc r Superfund Division 

Mark Peycke, C' , Office of Regional Counsel, Superfund Branch 

Director, Superfund Division 

Date 

'1 !G. / '1/ 

Date 

qjz,;/; 

Date 

<d?!ob(rt ~. 

Date 

r/r~l/f( D te 
AMENDED FINAL CLOSE OUT REPORT 

PALMER BARGE LINE SUPERFUND SITE 

PORT ARTHUR, JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS 

I. INTRODUCTION 

This Amended Final Close Out Report documents that the U. S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) have 

completed all of the cleanup activities for the Palmer Barge Line Superfund Site (hereinafter "the 

Site" or "PBL Site") in accordance with the EPA's guidance document titled, "Close Out 

Procedures for National Priorities List Sites" (OSWER Directive 9320.2-22, May 2011). 

II. SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS 

Background 

The PBL Site (CERCLIS ID - TXD068 104561), a former barge-cleaning operation, 

encompasses approximately 17 acres and is located approximately 4.5 miles east-northeast of the 

City of Port Arthur on Old Yacht Club Road on Pleasure Islet. Pleasure Islet is a peninSUla 

located approximately 0.5 miles southwest of the mouth of the Neches River. The Site is 

bordered by vacant property to the north, by Old Yacht Club Road to the west, by the State 

Marine of Port Arthur Superfund Site to the south, and Sabine Lake to the east. 

Pleasure Islet is a manmade landmass consisting of dredge spoils generated during the 

construction and maintenance of the Sabine-Neches canal, also called the Intracoastal Waterway. 

The canal was constructed between 1898 and approximately 1920 in the vicinity of Sabine Lake 

and the Neches River, between the current Site location and the mainland. Between 1955 and 

1957, a portion of the canal along the western side of Pleasure Islet was abandoned, and a new 

canal was cut along the eastern and southern sides of Pleasure Islet. Pleasure Islet was created 

when a land bridge was constructed across the abandoned portions of the canal, between the. 

northern tip of Pleasure Island and the mainland. Vehicle access to the Site is limited to a single 

dirt road starting at the western Site border along Old Yacht Club Road. 

The Site, along with the adjacent properties to the north and south, were used as a 

Municipal Landfill for the City ofPort Arthur from 1956 to 1987. Although disposal at the 

landfill has long since ceased and the landfill contents have been covered with dredged 

sediments, the contents are still present on the Site in the subsurface soils. 

In April 1982, John Palmer, President of Palmer Barge Line Inc. purchased approximately 

17 acres from the City of Port Arthur for the purpose of servicing and maintaining barges and 
marine vessels. The company ceased operations on the property in July 1997. 

During operation, the typical activities performed at the Site included cleaning, degassing, 

maintenance, and inspection of barges and other marine equipment. Cleaning operations 

included the removal of sludge and other residual material by pressure steaming the vessel holds, 

engines, and boilers. Engines were degreased and accumulations of sludges were removed. 

Degassing activities involved the removal of explosive vapors from vessel holds using nitrogen 

or boiler exhaust. Maintenance and inspection activities included the replacement and/or repair 

of valves, engines, and line leaks followed by pressure tests .. A flare was located on-site to burn 

excess gases and liquids produced during facility operations. 

Site History 

In December 1996, the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC), 

now the TCEQ, conducted a multi-media investigation. The purpose ofthis study was to 

determine the compliance status of the facility. 

In March 1998, the TNRCC along with the EPA conducted an investigation to identify 

potential sources and to sample the soils and sediments at the Site. Five areas ~f stained soil 

were identified on-site near the sumps, boiler house, flare, ASTs, and wastewater tanks. Sample 

results indicated the presence of metals, semi-volatile organic constituents (SVOCs), and 

pesticides in on-site soil. Metals and SVOCs were detected in offshore sediments adjacent to the 

Site. 

In July 1999, the TNRCC sampled the ASTs, roll-off boxes and slop tanks to characterize 

the stored materials. 

In October 1999, the EPA conducted an Expanded Site Inspection (Weston 2000) to 

determine the presence and nature of on- and off-site constituents and to determine migration and 

routes of exposure of site-related constituents. The investigations of the Site included the 

wastewater aboveground storage tank (AST), boiler house ASTs, open top slop tanks area, 

horizontal ASTs, twelve ASTs area, flare area, area east of flare in the center of the Site, ground 

water, and sediments of Sabine Lake. Results ofthe inspection indicated the presence of volatile 

organic constituents (VOCs), SVOCs, pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and metals. 

EPA published a proposed rule on May 11, 2000 (65FR30489), to add the Site to the 

National Priorities List (NPL). The Site was added to the NPL in a final rule published on July 

27, 2000 (65FR46096). The surface water migration pathway was scored as part of the Hazard 

Ranking System Documentation Record. 

4 
History of CERCLA Enforcement Activities 

On September 30, 2002, the EPA issued an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC, EPA 

2002) to the PRPs to conduct the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RIlFS; URS 

2004 and 200Sa, respectively) for the Palmer Barge Site. Voluntary respondents to the Order 

were: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Chevron/Texaco Inc., Kirby Inland Marine, LP, 

Kirby Inland Marine, Inc. of Louisiana, and Ashland Inc. 

On May 7, 2007, the EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order (UAO, EPA 2007) for 

Remedial Design and Remedial Action (RDIRA) to a group of PRPs. The UAO became 

effective on June 6, 2007. By letter dated June IS, 2007, a group of four (4) companies agreed to 

comply with the UAO to conduct the RDIRA for the Site. 

Removal Actions Performed 

In August 2001, the EPA completed a Removal Action (Weston 2001) to remove source 

materials stored on-site. Activities included waste removal, water treatment, oil/water 

separation, and sludge stabilization. Approximately 2S0,000 gallons of water were treated onsite; 330 cubic yards of sludge stabilized; and 100,000 gallons of oil/styrene were separated and 

. removed from the Site. All of the ASTs were removed except for a 420,000-gallon AST on the 

northern portion of the Site that contained liquid and sludge materials. Several of the concrete 

AST foundations remain along with gravel throughout the Site. 

Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study 

On September 30, 2002, the EPA issued an AOC to the PRPs to conduct an RIlFS. The 

objectives of the RIlFS were to characterize the nature and extent of constituents of concern in 

soil, ground water, and surface water and sediments of Sabine Lake. 

Constituents detected in soil samples included metals, SVOCs, VOCs, PCBs, and 

pesticides. Several samples containing concentrations of metals and SVOCs above background 

were from samples collected in soil that contained municipal waste, indicating that some 

constituents present may not be due to activities from the barge cleaning operation. 

There is no current or anticipated future use of the shallow ground water at the Site and it 

is not considered a potential drinking water source. The shallow ground water resulted from the 

dredging activities .that formed the isle where the former PBL Site is located. Ground water 

samples collected from permanent ground water monitoring wells installed downgradient of the 

Site did not contain significant concentrations of Site-related constituents above risk-based 

levels. 

S 
In 2004, URS Corporation, on behalfofthe Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs), 

submitted the Remedial Investigation (Rl) Report (URS 2004), which characterized the nature 

and extent of constituents present in environmental media at the Site and in adjacent Sabine Lake 

surface water and sediments. The constituents detected in the sediments of Sabine Lake included 

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and metals. Many ofthe constituents found in the soil at the 

Site were not detected in sediment samples. Surface water samples contained only metals at low 

concentrations. 

The human health risk assessment concluded that contaminants were present in Site soils 

and sediments that presented an unacceptable risk to on-site workers and off-site recreational 

anglers. The screening level ecological risk assessment concluded that site contaminants did not 

present an unacceptable risk to ecological receptors. 

A total off our alternatives were developed for the Site during the FS. The EPA chose 

excavation and off-site disposal as th,e Selected Remedy for the contaminated soils at the Site. 

Record of Decision Findings 

Based on the results of the Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment (BHHRA, URS 

200Sb) and Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment (SLERA, URS 200Sc), the EPA's 

Selected Remedy for the PBL Site, identified in the September 2005 ROD, was "Excavation and 

Off-Site Disposal." The Selected Remedy consisted of the following components: 

• Excavation of approximately 1,204 cubic yards of the upper two feet of soil 

,that exceed human health and ecological risk-based levels at each of the 

response areas. 

• Confirmation sampling for constituents of potential concern at each of the 

response areas. 

• Backfilling of excavated areas with clean soil. 

• Off-site disposal of the excavated soils at a permitted disposal facility. 

• Implementation of institutional controls (lCs) to restrict future land use only 

for industrial purposes. The ICs shall be a restrictive covenant recorded by the 

property owner in the real property records of Jefferson County, Texas. 

• Abandonment of five existing ground water monitoring wells. 

• Wastewater AST sludge removal and decontamination and off-site disposal. 

6 
The Remedial Action Objectives (RAOs) achieved by the Selected Remedy for the Site were 

based on the following: 

• The reasonably anticipated land use scenario is based on the future 

redevelopment of the Site for industrial or commercial use, consistent with 

current Site use and surrounding land use. 

• Potential ecological risks were considered for Site soils to prevent exposure to 

ecological receptors and prevent surface runoff of contaminants to Sabine 

Lake sediments. 

The RAOs for the Site were: 

• Prevent direct contact, ingestion, and inhalation of surface soils that exceed 

human health risk-based levels, based on an industrial worker scenario, for the 

chemicals of concern (COCs). 

• Prevent off-site migration of COCs to Sabine Lake sediments that exceed 

human health and ecological risk-based levels for the COCs. 

• Prevent exposure to Site soils that may pose a risk to ecological receptors. 

Remedial Design and Remedial Action 

On May 7, 2007, the EPA issued a UAO for RD/RA to the PRPs, which became effective 

on June 6,2007. The Final RDIRA Work Plan was approved by the EPA on August 2,2007. A 

total of 181 tons of contaminated soils were excavated and disposed at a permitted disposal 

facility. Each response area was then backfilled with clean soil. Additionally, approximately 

78,340 pounds of oil were skimmed from the 10,000-barrel AST and recycled for fuel blending, 

and approximately 854,886 pounds of the remaining sludge material within the AST were 

incinerated. As required by the 2005 ROD, five permanent ground water monitoring wells were 

plugged and abandoned. The RA on-site construction was completed on September 4, 2007. 

The June 2008 Remedial Action Report was approved on July 1,2008. 

An institutional control, in the form of restrictive covenant by the property owner, to the 

benefit of the State of Texas and the United States Government, was recorded in the real property 

records of Jefferson County, Texas on March 25, 2011. This IC ensures that future Site use 

remains commercial/industrial. 

7 
III. MONITORING RESULTS 

The EPA chose a 1.0 x 10-5 target cleanup goal based on exposure to COCs that exceeded 

those levels at surface soils. The COCs and the selected soil cleanup goals achieved by the 

RDIRA for the Human Health Risk Areas were: 

• Aldrin - 1.1 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg). 

• Benzo(a)pyrene - 2.3 mg/kg. 

• Benzo(a)anthracene - 23.0 mg/kg. 

• Dieldrin - 1.2 mg/kg. 

• Heptachlor Epoxide - 2.1 mg/kg. 

• Naphthalene - 210.0 mg/kg, 

• Pentachlorophenol- 100.0 mg/kg. 

• Lead - 800.0 mg/kg. 

The COCs and the selected soil cleanup goals achieved by the RDIRA for ecological 

receptors were: 

• 4,4'-DDD - 0.0864 mg/kg. 

• 4,4' -DDE ~ 0.0864 mg/kg. 

• 4,4'-DDT - 0.0865 mg/kg. 

• Butyl benzyl phthalate - 5.37 mg/kg. 

• Lead, total- 497.0 mg/kg. 

• Methoxychlor - 0.09 mg/kg. 

The ROD required the collection of confirmation samples, including analyses for the 

constituents of potential concern, at each of the response areas. Analytical results were used to 

determine horizontal limits of impacted media in each of the response areas. If constituents were 

found to contain concentrations in excess of the remediation goals (RG), step-out samples were 

8 
analyzed for those constituents. Additional step-out samples were collected and analyzed when 

the step-out samples exceeded the RO. This process continued until sample results for perimeter 

samples were below the RO, indicating horizontal delineation had been achieved according to the 

requirements of the ROD. These results are documented in the July 1, 2008 RA report. 

IV. SUMMARY OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIRED 

Operation and maintenance activities include monitoring effectiveness ofthe recorded 

restrictive covenant. 

V. DEMONSTRATION OF CLEANUP ACTIVITY QUALITY ASSURANCE AND 

QUALITY CONTROL 

The Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QAlQC) program for the PBL Site was 

conducted in accordance with the EPA-approved work plan for the RA construction activities. 

The following project plans were prepared and implemented for the RA: 

$ Community Relations Plan. 

$ Site Management Plan. 

$ Health and Safety Plan. 

$ Field Sampling Plan. 

$ Quality Assurance Project Plan. 

$ Data Management Plan. 

$ Pollution Control and Mitigation Plan. 

$ Transportation and Disposal and Waste Management Plan. 

$ Construction Quality Assurance Plan. 

These plans ensured that the cleanup activities met all QAlQC requirements for the RA 

for the Site. The EPA performed oversight throughout the implementation of the RA. The 

TCEQ reviewed and commented on all project plans for the Site, participated in the Final 

Construction Inspection, and reviewed and commented on the Draft Final and Amended Draft 

Final Close Out Report. 

9 
VI. FIVE-YEAR REVIEWS 

Since remaining conditions at the Site will not allow for unlimited use and unrestricted 

exposure, a Five-Year Review (FYR) must be conducted no less often than every five years from 

initiation of the Remedial Action to ensure that the remedy is, or will continue to be, protective 

of human health and the environment. The effectiveness of the recorded IC will be part of the 

FYR for the Site to ensure that future Site development is consistent with the industrial cleanup 

standards for which the remedy is based. The EPA will conduct the first FYR by September 4, 

2012. 

VII. SITE COMPLETION CRITERIA 

The implemented remedy at the Palmer Barge Line Superfund Site met the cleanup levels 

specified in the 2007 Record of Decision and documented in the July 2008RA Report. The 

implemented restrictive covenant ensures future land use will remain commercial/industrial. 

Therefore, no further Superfund response is needed to protect human health and the environment. 

Samuel 

~/b~ Coleman, P.E., Director 

Superfund Division 

Date 

10 
VIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2002. 

Administrative Order on Consent for Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study. 

Palmer Barge Line Superfund Site. September. 

EPA. 2005a. 

Proposed Plan. Palmer Barge Line Superfund Site. July. 

EPA. 2005b. 

Record of Decision. Palmer Barge Line Superfund Site. September. 

EPA. 2007. 

Unilateral Administrative Order. Palmer Barge Line Superfund Site. May. 

URS Corporation (URS). 2004. 

Remedial Investigation Report. Palmer Barge Line Superfund Site. July. 

URS. 2005a. 

Feasibility Study Report. Palmer Barge Line Superfund Site. July. 

URS.2005b. 

Human Health Risk Assessment, Palmer Barge Line Superfund Site. June. 

URS. 2005e. 

Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment. Palmer Barge Line Superfund Site. June. 

Weston Solutions, Inc. (Weston). 2000. 

Expanded Site Inspection. Palmer Barge Line Superfund Sites. January. 

Weston. 2001. 

Removal Action Report. State Marine of Port Arthur and Palmer Barge Line Superfund 

Sites. August. 

11