alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND AS OF
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                  0000925665
<NAME> SPPS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,227
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       425
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1652)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  60
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (60)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (60)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (60)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-09-00392-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

CARLTON RAY RICHARDSON, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the Criminal District Court

of Jefferson County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Carlton Ray Richardson, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion

to dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having
2

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,

and our mandate will issue forthwith. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed

the 11th day of March, 2010.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 28, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 28, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0066. TIMIS VASILE et al. v. ENOCH ADDO.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 15C04688
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05052

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

05052\05052_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05052\05052_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05052\05052_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05052\05052_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05052\05052_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05052\05052_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05052\05052 Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

x 05052\Supporting Documents\05052 A5-2 Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05052\Supporting Documents\05052 A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05052\Supporting Documents\05052 D3-1 pond-1 D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05052\Supporting Documents\05052 D3-1 pond-2 D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05052\Supporting Documents\05052 D3-1 pond-3 D-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05052\Supporting Documents\05052 I2-7 2009 Form 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05052\Supporting Documents\05052 Submittal Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05052\05052_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05052\05052_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# Third D istrict Court of Ap peal
State of F lorida
Opinion filed January 3, 2024

. Not final until disposition of t imely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23 -0 455 Lower Tribunal No. F22 -1 470

________________


### Sheldon Smi th , Appellant,

vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee.

An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Richard Hersch , Judge.
S heldon Smith , in proper person.
A shley Moody , Attorney General, for appellee.

B efore LOGUE , C.J., and EMAS and BOKOR , JJ.
P ER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-40455

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-94-CR-218-1

- - - - - - - - - -

November 19, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 David Lopez appeals his conviction for being a felon in

possession of a firearm. He argues that (1) the district court

erred by admitting identification testimony following an

impermissibly suggestive pretrial photographic lineup; (2) the

evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; (3) the

prosecution delayed in turning over evidence favorable to his

defense; and (4) the court erred in sentencing him based on a

finding that six firearms were involved in the offense.
No. 95-40455

-2-

 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of conviction. See United

States v. Lopez, No. 7:95CR00218-001 (S.D. Tex.; May 27, 1995). 

Lopez’s motion to supplement the record on appeal is DENIED.

 AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   GWIN, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         I certify that, to the best of my knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of GWIN, Inc. for the period ending July 31, 2003:

         (1) complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  aspects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of GWIN,
Inc.






/s/ Jeff Johnson
Jeff Johnson
Chief Financial Officer
October 15, 2003


A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 has been provided to GWIN, Inc. and will be retained
by GWIN,  Inc. and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  upon
request.
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidus Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward H. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Shelby E. Sherard, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 
 (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 
 (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 

Date: August 2, 2018
  
/s/ EDWARD H. ROSS
  Edward H. Ross  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
  
(Principal Executive Officer)
  
/s/ SHELBY E. SHERARD
  
Shelby E. Sherard
  
Chief Financial Officer
  
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ENV-A2700ANDTHEAGENCY'S RESPONSE THERETO Comment : EPAexpressed concern about the exemption for chutes, bins, feeders, and conveyors from

the fugitive emission control system . DES Response: DES expanded the section on fugitive dust to clarify that any dust emissions fromchutes, bins, feeders, and conveyors must be controlled. These devices are exempt fromthe fugitive emission control system, however, because the systemis not designed to capture dust fromthese sources. It is attached to the mixer and dryer exhaust and works by creating negative airpressure to capture fugitive emissions in the system's ducts. Comment : EPAalso suggested changes to the language on visible emissions, stating that the proposed language "is open to interpretations not intended by NHDES." EPA's wording would put an upper limit of 40 % on opacity and add a condition that any "malfunction was not caused, entirely or in part, by poor maintenance, careless operation, poor design or any other reasonably preventable condition." DES Response: EPA's proposed opacity cap during the 6-minute opacity exemption period was not included in the final rule for the following reasons. First, the 6-minute exemption applies during periods ofoperation (startup, shutdown, or malfunction) during which time it may not be possible to control the opacity level . For example, high opacity during a "cold" startup can be caused by cold equipment temperatures quenching combustion and higher levels ofexcess air during the initial the periods ofcombustion where the combustion conditions are very dynamic. During such aperiod, DESbelieves that it is notpossible to control opacity levels. Limiting the exemption period to 6- minutes per hour in and of itself adequately protects the particulate standard. Second, this change would result in an increased burden on permitted sources to report and on the department to respond to permit deviation reports, most ofwhichwould involve shorttermspikes that would not be worth pursuing for enforcement purposes and would not provide any significant environmental benefit. EPA's additional language regarding malfunctions was not included because DES' definition of "malfunction" in Env-A 101 .69 quotes EPA's definition in 40 CFR §60.2 and, therefore, should be sufficient .
Exhibit 32.2

SECURE NetCheckIn INC.

A Nevada corporation

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark W. DeFoor, Chief Executive Officer and President of SECURE NetCheckIn Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)

The report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

SECURE NetCheckIn INC.

Dated: December 3, 2012

By:

  /s/ *Mark W. DeFoor*

 

 

Mark W. DeFoor

 

 

President & Chief Executive Officer |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.09 MB)

Tags:DLA Disposition Services, dla, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### People v Jose Aviles, Jr., Also Known as Jose Aviles.

Motion by assigned counsel to be relieved, to withdraw previously submitted appellate brief, and for assignment of new appellate counsel, denied without prejudice to renewal thereof in the event that assigned counsel and/or defendant-appellant can provide a more persuasive factual showing to establish that defendant should be accorded another appeal. *(See,*171 AD2d 539.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.
Appendix A

 VISTAS 

 

Regional Haze SIP for TN Class I Areas

Appendix A - 1

January 18, 2008
Appendix A.1 

 VISTAS Signed Copy of MOU

Regional Haze SIP for TN Class I Areas

Appendix A - 2

January 18, 2008
Appendix A.2 

VISTAS Memorandum of Understanding

Regional Haze SIP for TN Class I Areas

Appendix A - 3

January 18, 2008
Appendix A.3

 VISTAS Bylaws

Regional Haze SIP for TN Class I Areas

Appendix A - 4

January 18, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998         
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998         
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1998         
<CASH>                                         132,099
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  212,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,468,022
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,981,775
<PP&E>                                         382,958
<DEPRECIATION>                                 383,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,922,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,348,411
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,757
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,569,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,922,493
<SALES>                                      1,562,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,562,664
<CGS>                                        1,049,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,049,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,051,187
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             790,456
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,328,691)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,329,491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.76)
        


</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 917 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a reduced rate 

of excise tax on beer produced domestically by certain qualifying producers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2013 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. 

COCHRAN, Mr. COONS, Mr. COWAN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. MERKLEY, Ms. 

MIKULSKI, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. TESTER, Mr. WICKER, Mr. 

WYDEN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. PORTMAN, and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a reduced rate of excise tax on beer produced domestically by certain qualifying producers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Brewer Rein5 vestment and Expanding Workforce Act of 2013’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 917 IS

1 SEC. 2. REDUCED RATE OF EXCISE TAX ON BEER PRO2 DUCED DOMESTICALLY BY CERTAIN QUALI3 FYING PRODUCERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 5051(a) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and 

7 (C) as subparagraphs (C) and (D), respectively, and 

8 (2) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting 

9 the following new subparagraphs: 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a brew11 er who produces not more than 6,000,000 bar12 rels of beer during the calendar year, the per 

13 barrel rate of tax imposed by this section shall 

14 be— 

15 ‘‘(i) $3.50 on the first 60,000 quali16 fied barrels of production, and 

17 ‘‘(ii) $16 on the first 1,940,000 quali18 fied barrels of production to which clause 

19 (i) does not apply. 

20 ‘‘(B) QUALIFIED BARRELS OF PRODUC21 TION.—For purposes of this paragraph, the 

22 term ‘qualified barrels of production’ means, 

23 with respect to any brewer for any calendar 

24 year, the number of barrels of beer which are 

25 removed in such year for consumption or sale 

26 and which have been brewed or produced by 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 917 IS

1 such brewer at qualified breweries in the United 

2 States.’’. 

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

4 (1) Subparagraph (C) of section 5051(a)(2) of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as redesignated 

6 by this section, is amended— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘2,000,000 barrel quan8 tity’’ and inserting ‘‘6,000,000 barrel quantity’’, 

9 and 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘60,000 barrel quantity’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘60,000 and 1,940,000 barrel 

12 quantities’’. 

13 (2) Subparagraph (D) of such section, as so re14 designated, is amended by striking ‘‘2,000,000 bar15 rels’’ and inserting ‘‘6,000,000 barrels’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to beer removed during calendar 

18 years beginning after the date of the enactment of this 

19 Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1 

### Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Dwight Mallory <Dmallory@resoluteenergy.com>

Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 2:48 PM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: McElmo Crrek Unit Main Flare

Attachments: MCU Map.pdf

Shaheerah,

The McElmo Creek Unit Flare is located in the SESE of Section 31, Township 40 South, Range 25 East.

Dwight E. Mallory

Environmental/Regulatory Manager

Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC

1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2800

Denver, CO 80203

Direct: 303-573-4886 X 1165

This e

‐ mail message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential,

privileged, and proprietary information of Resolute Energy Corporation. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or

distribution may be prohibited under law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply E

‐

mail of any erroneous transmission, and destroy the original E

‐ mail, any attachments, and all copies of the original

message. Thank you.