alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marvin Harris, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered April 13, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record of the defendant’s *Wade*hearing demonstrates that there were obvious differences in height and age between the defendant and the other individuals used by the police at the lineup procedure employed herein. Indeed, the hearing court repeatedly expressed misgivings regarding the validity of the lineup, noting that the other individuals were noticeably taller than the defendant and that "some * * * look much older than the defendant”. Additionally, the complainant testified at the hearing that, after selecting the defendant’s photograph from a "mug” book less than 10 days earlier, she received a telephone call from a detective who requested that she view a lineup and informed her that "he had some suspects” and that "there was somebody that [he] wanted her to look at”. While the hearing court ultimately upheld the lineup procedure as not being unduly suggestive, the cumulative effect of the foregoing considerations leads us to conclude that the complainant’s lineup identification should have been suppressed *(see generally, People v Burwell,*26 NY2d 331; *People v Gaddy,*115 AD2d 658). However, while testimony regarding the lineup identification was improperly received at trial, we find that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in view of the hearing court’s determination, amply supported by the evidence, that the complainant had a strong independent basis for her in-court identification of the defendant based upon her observations at the time of the crime *(see, People v Adams,*53 NY2d 241).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Brown, Sullivan and Eiber, JJ., concur.
ED sTqT

~

A s UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 6 

1445 ROSS AVENUE, SUITE 1200 

Z~F "o= DALLAS, TX 75202-2733 

' +rA~ PROZEG4 

Ms. Margaret Earnest 

State Implementation Plan Team 

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 

Austin, TX 78753 

Dear Ms. Earnest, 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft revision of the Texas Regional 

Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP). I appreciate the tremendous effort that has gone into the 

preparation of this document. My staff has reviewed the SIP and our comments are enclosed. 

We stand ready to assist the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality as you prepare the 

final document. 

If you have any questions concerning these comments, please feel free to call me at 

(214) 665-7242, or Joe Kordzi, of my staff at (214) 665-7186. 

Sincerely yours, 

~ 

Guy Donaldson, Chief 

Air Planning Section (6PD-L) 

Enclosure 

Int®rnet Address (URL) ® http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/R®cyclabie . Printed wfth Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycted Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer)
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidus Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward H. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Shelby E. Sherard, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 
Date: August 1, 2019   
/s/ EDWARD H. ROSS
   Edward H. Ross   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)   
/s/ SHELBY E. SHERARD
   Shelby E. Sherard   Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)**
DISMISS and Opinion F iled September 26, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-23-00225-CV KITTY PERKINS, Appellant V. ST. JUDE/PARK CENTRAL, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-01046-E
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justi ce Molberg, and Justice Goldstein Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant’s brief in this case is ove rdue. On August 29, 2023 we informed
appellant her brief was overdue and directed her to file he r brief within ten days. We
cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal

without further notice. To date, appellant has not file d her brief or otherwise
corresponded with the Court regardi ng the status of this appeal.–2– We dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

230225F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

KITTY PERKINS, Appellant

No. 05-23-00225-CV V.

ST. JUDE/PARK CENTRAL, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-01046- E. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered September 26, 2023
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the quarterly report of Aristocrat Group Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Christopher Brown, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date: September 14, 2018BY: /s/ Christopher BrownChristopher BrownPresident, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Sole Director  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 12.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Jaime Garcia, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Embotelladora Andina S.A.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles in Chile;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 

 
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting./s/ JAIME GARCIAJaime Garcia
Exhibit 10.41


 


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







This Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement (this "Amendment") is entered into this __ day of February 2014, by and among PINNACLE BANK, a Tennessee state-chartered bank (the "Bank"), PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC., a Tennessee corporation (the "Company") (collectively, the Bank and the Company are referred to hereinafter as the "Employer") and ROBERT A. MCCABE, JR. (the "Executive").







WHEREAS, the Bank, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2008 (the "Employment Agreement"), pursuant to which the Executive serves as Chairman of the Bank and the Company;







WHEREAS, the Bank, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated November 20, 2012; and







WHEREAS, each of the Bank, the Company and the Executive desires to further amend the Employment Agreement.







NOW THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:







1.            Capitalized Terms.  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement.







2.            Amendment to Employment Agreement. The Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:







(a)            Section 4.7 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:







4.7 VACATION.  On a non-cumulative basis, the Executive shall be entitled to six (6) weeks of vacation in each successive twelve-month period during the Term, during which his compensation shall be paid in full.







3.            Except as expressly modified hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







4.            This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.







[remainder of page intentionally left blank]


















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 2 to be executed as of the date first above written.







	
 

	
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.


	
 

	
By:

	
/s/ Harold R. Carpenter


	
 

	
Name:

	
Harold R. Carpenter


	
 

	
Title:

	
Chief Financial Officer


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
PINNACLE BANK


	
 

	
By:

	
/s/ Harold R. Carpenter


	
 

	
Name:

	
Harold R. Carpenter


	
 

	
Title:

	
Chief Financial Officer


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
EXECUTIVE


	
 

	
 

	
/s/ Robert A. McCabe Jr.


	
 

	
 

	
Robert A. McCabe, Jr.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0024 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. FELIPE AGUSTIN TORRES ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 9 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 1 2021

03/01/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0024
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.01 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
1

The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2278

___________

United States of America, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Missouri.

Norman Dale Unverzagt, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant - Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 9, 2006

 Filed: February 16, 2006 

___________

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, HANSEN and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Norman Dale Unverzagt plead guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court1

 found that Unverzagt had

three prior convictions for “violent felonies” under the Armed Career Criminal Act,

18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). The district court imposed the mandatory minimum sentence

of 180 months under that statute. 
-2-

Unverzagt appeals, arguing that two of his prior convictions were for burglaries

of commercial buildings and should not be treated as “violent felonies” for purposes

of the Armed Career Criminal Act. Unverzagt’s arguments are foreclosed by the

Supreme Court’s opinion in Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 599 (1990)

(holding that a categorical approach is used to determine if a prior conviction involved

statutory elements that showed “generic burglary,” i.e., unlawful entry into, or

remaining in, a building or structure with the intent to commit a crime). Unverzagt’s

arguments are also foreclosed by numerous cases from our circuit that follow Taylor

and hold that burglaries of commercial buildings are “violent felonies” under §

924(e)(1). See United States v. Smith, 422 F.3d 715, 721 (8th Cir. 2005) (“The

guidelines definition of crime of violence found in § 4B1.2 is also viewed as

interchangeable with the statutory definition of violent felony found in 18 U.S.C. §

924(e).”); United States v. Sun Bear, 307 F.3d 747, 753 (8th Cir. 2002) (holding that

attempted burglary of a commercial property qualified as a “crime of violence” under

U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2); United States v. Hascall, 76 F.3d 902, 905 (8th Cir. 1996)

(“Building or structure in this generic definition is broad enough to include both a

commercial building and a residence.”); United States v. Solomon, 998 F.2d 587, 590-

91 (8th Cir. 1993) (holding that attempted second degree robbery under Minnesota

law qualified as a “violent felony” under § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii)).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

______________________________
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 770 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 

study of President Station in Baltimore, Maryland, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2013 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Ms. MIKULSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

special resource study of President Station in Baltimore, 

Maryland, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘President Street Sta5 tion Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

9 the Secretary of the Interior. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 770 IS

1 (2) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

2 means the President Street Station, a railroad ter3 minal in Baltimore, Maryland, the history of which 

4 is tied to the growth of the railroad industry in the 

5 19th century, the Civil War, the Underground Rail6 road, and the immigrant influx of the early 20th 

7 century. 

8 SEC. 3. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

9 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a special 

10 resource study of the study area. 

11 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub12 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

13 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

14 study area; 

15 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

16 designating the study area as a unit of the National 

17 Park System; 

18 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

19 protection, and interpretation of the study area by 

20 the Federal Government, State or local government 

21 entities, or private and nonprofit organizations; 

22 (4) consult with interested Federal agencies, 

23 State or local governmental entities, private and 

24 nonprofit organizations, or any other interested indi25 viduals; 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 770 IS

1 (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac2 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 

3 maintenance associated with the alternatives; and 

4 (6) identify any authorities that would compel 

5 or permit the Secretary to influence local land use 

6 decisions under the alternatives. 

7 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

8 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec9 tion 8 of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5). 

10 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

11 on which funds are first made available for the study 

12 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the 

13 Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep14 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

15 Resources of the Senate a report that describes— 

16 (1) the results of the study; and 

17 (2) any conclusions and recommendations of the 

18 Secretary. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exh 10.23 12.31.2013






EXHIBIT 10.23


TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Summary Sheet as of December 13, 2013


On December 13, 2013, the Board of Directors approved the following compensation for non-employee directors, effective in 2014:


		
	•
	Board member annual retainer - $60,000 


		
	•
	Annual equity compensation - $120,000, using a 12 month average share price as the basis for awards


		
	•
	Presiding Director - annual retainer of $15,000 


		
	•
	Audit Committee Chair - annual retainer of $15,000


		
	•
	Human Resources Committee Chair - annual retainer of $10,000


		
	•
	Finance and Risk Committee Chair - annual retainer of $10,000


		
	•
	Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee Chair - annual retainer of $10,000


		
	•
	Board meeting fee - $2,000 for each meeting attended 


		
	•
	Committee members - $2,000 for each meeting attended


		
	•
	Ad hoc or special assignment work performed for or at the request of the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President - $2,000 per day