alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Pierre J. Renelique, M.D., P.C., as Assignee of Guzman, Ramon, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Park Ins. Co., Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Gullo &amp; Associates, LLP (Natalie Socorro of counsel), for appellant.The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Ingrid Joseph, J.), entered December 17, 2015. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>Contrary to defendant's contention, the Civil Court properly determined that defendant had failed to establish the timely and proper mailing of the independent medical examination (IME) scheduling letters. Defendant's moving papers stated that the IME scheduling letters were sent to plaintiff's assignor at "2497 Grant Avenue, Basement, Bronx, NY 10468," but the NF-3 form submitted by plaintiff indicated that the assignor's address was "2307 Morris Ave, #2C, Bronx NY 10453." A presumption of receipt arises only where there is proof of a proper mailing (<i>see Residential Holding Corp. v Scottsdale Ins. Co.</i>, 286 AD2d 679 [2001]; <a href="../2013/2013_50751.htm" target="_blank"><i>Infinity Health Prods., Ltd. v Redland Ins. Co.</i>, 39 Misc 3d 140</a>[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 50751[U] [App Term, 2d <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2013]). To the extent that copies of the IME scheduling letters were sent to an attorney, there is nothing in the record to suggest that plaintiff's assignor was represented by that attorney. Consequently, defendant's moving papers failed to demonstrate that the IMEs had been properly scheduled (<a href="../2014/2014_50476.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Great Health Care Chiropractic, P.C. v Citiwide Auto Leasing</i>, 43 Misc 3d 127</a>[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 50476[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2014]; <i>Infinity Health Prods., Ltd.</i>, 39 Misc 3d 140[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 50751[U]; <a href="../2006/2006_50318.htm" target="_blank"><i>cf. Star Med. Servs., P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co.</i>, 11 Misc 3d 131</a>[A], 2006 NY Slip Op 50344[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d &amp; 11th Jud Dists 2006]) and, thus, that it is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><p></p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: May 25, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 46193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19927]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings; National Science Board

    The National Science Board, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR 
part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 
1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), 
hereby gives notice of RESCHEDULING a meeting for the transaction of 
National Science Board business.

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF ORIGINAL ANNOUNCEMENT: 83 FR 43710, 
published on August 27, 2018. The teleconference meeting was originally 
scheduled for Thursday, August 30, 2018, from 3:00-4:00 p.m. EDT.

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF POSTPONEMENT: 83 FR 44675, published on 
August 30, 2018.

NEW TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: This closed teleconference meeting of the 
National Science Board has been rescheduled and will be held on 
Tuesday, September 18, 2018, from 4:00-5:00 p.m. EDT.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Brad Gutierrez, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0a2a7b5b4a9a5b2b280aeb3a6eea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="35575240415c504747755b46531b525a43">[email protected]</span></a>, 
703-292-7000. Please refer to the National Science Board website for 
additional information. Meeting information and schedule updates (time, 
place, subject matter, and status of meeting) may be found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/notices.jsp#sunshine.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant, National Science Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2018-19927 Filed 9-10-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Brockett, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Haft, J.), rendered on January 6, 1989, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty of robbery in the second degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of six to twelve years, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
New Mexico Regional Haze State Implementation Plan Revisions 

 September 5, 2013

NM064-03-35 NMED Exhibit Presented at September 5, 2013 Hearing 

NM064-03-36 NMED Ex. 16 Corrections to Chapter 10 and Appendix D 

***********************************end*****************************************
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3739

_____________________________

ALPHONSO RAY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

David Rimmer, Judge.

July 16, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of Appellant’s response to the Court’s 

order of September 4, 2018, the Court has determined that the 

appeal is untimely. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The 

dismissal is without prejudice to Appellant filing a petition for 

belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 

9.141(c).

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Alphonso Ray, pro se; Bruce A. Miller, Public Defender, and Julie 

M. Edwards, Assistant Public Defender, Milton, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# U nit ed Sta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 06-2506
UNI TED STATES OF AMERI CA, Appellee ,

v
. MEL VI N RI CHARDSON,
De fe nd a nt, Ap pe lla

nt.

ERRATA SHEET
Th e op ini on

of thi s Co ur t is su e d o n F e br

ua ry 8, 20 08 , is a me nd e d a s f

oll ow s: On Pa g e 13 , L ine 16 , r e pla c e " Sa te s" wi th " Sta te s"
AFS-11-196-E 

April 1, 2011 

 Exemption No. 9890A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0416 

Mr. Thomas E. Fosko 

Vice President, Regulatory Affairs 

Air Transport International, LLC 

2800 Cantrell Road 

Little Rock, AR 72202 

Dear Mr. Fosko: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9890. 

It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated February 23, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration on 

behalf of Air Transport International, LLC (ATI), for an extension of Exemption No. 9890. 

That exemption from § 121.310(d)(4) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 

allows ATI’s McDonnell Douglas DC–8 airplanes to carry passengers without a cockpit 

control device for each emergency light. 

In your petition you indicate there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative 

to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register. The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, 

and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to ATI. 

Our Decision 

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, delegated to me 

by the Administrator, I grant your petition. 
 2

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9890 to June 30, 2013, unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9890 remain the same. This letter must be 

attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9890. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 23.4





                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Tele-Communications, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos.   33-56271, 33-57177, 33-57399, 33- 57409, 33-57469, 33-59121, 33-63139,
33-64127, 33-65479, 33-65493, 33-65497 and 333-00765) on Form S-3, the
Registration Statement (No. 33-65311) on Form S-4, and the Registration
Statements (Nos. 33-44543, 33-54263, 33-57635, 33-60839, 33- 60843, 33-64827,
33-64829, 33-64831, 33-65483, 33-65485 and 33-65487) on Form S-8 of
Tele-Communications, Inc. of our report dated March 18, 1994, relating to the
consolidated statement of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows of
Liberty Media Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1993,
which report appears in the December 31, 1995 annual report on Form 10-K of
Tele-Communications, Inc.

Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for income taxes in
1993. Our report also contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the
former parent of Liberty Media Corporation contributed certain assets in
exchange for certain preferred stock, resulting in the assets being accounted
for at predecessor cost basis.


                                                       /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
                                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Denver, Colorado
March 26, 1996
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

VIRGINIA CISNEROS,

Appellant,

v.

AUGUSTIN PUENTES, JR.

,

Appellee

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 21

- 00 048

- C V

Appeal from the

388 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20 19DCV1100 )

O R D E R

Appell ee has filed a th ird motion to abate this appeal. The Court finds good cause to

grant this abatement. Therefore, we ORDER this appeal to be abated until June 30 , 2022. The

appellate timetable will be suspended during the abatement. The parties are directed to notify the

Court whether the dispute has been resolved and to file the motion necessary to dispose of the

appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(1), (2). If the parties a re unsuccessful in resolving the appeal

by agreement, the appeal will be reinstated and the Appellee’s brief w ill be due 3 0 days from the

date of the reinstatement order. NO FURTHER MOTIONS TO ABATE THE APPEAL WILL

BE GRANTED BY THIS COURT.

I T IS SO ORD ERED this 31 st day of May , 20 2 2

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2015 of Wellness Center USA, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew J. Kandalepas, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. Date:  February 22, 2016/s/ Andrew J. KandalepasName:  Andrew J. KandalepasTitle: Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                               TOWER AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
                                          
           STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             Year Ended December 31, 
                                 ---------------------------------------------------------
                                   1994          1995       1996        1997       1998
                                   ----          ----       ----        ----       -----
<S>                              <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>
Earnings:
Income before income
  taxes and extraordinary
  item . . . . . . . . . . . .   $  12,403   $  20,121   $  34,337   $  80,741  $  135,353
Net fixed charges (1). . . . .       2,351       2,501       8,551      44,385      52,217
                                 ---------   ---------   ---------  ----------  ----------
Total earnings . . . . . . . .   $  14,754   $  22,622   $  42,888  $  125,126  $  187,570
                                 ---------   ---------   ---------  ----------  ----------
                                 ---------   ---------   ---------  ----------  ----------
Fixed charges:
Interest expense . . . . . . .    $  1,956    $  2,027    $  7,636   $  36,651   $  42,506
Capitalized interest.. . . . .          --       1,157          --       3,409       3,732
Interest factor of rental
  expense (2). . . . . . . . .         271         311         660       6,255       7,352
Amortization of debt
  expense. . . . . . . . . . .         124         163         255       1,479       2,359
Dividends on trust
  preferred securities . . . .          --          --          --          --       9,800
                                 ---------   ---------   ---------  ----------  ----------
Total fixed charges... . . . .    $  2,351    $  3,658    $  8,551   $  47,794   $  65,749
                                 ---------   ---------   ---------  ----------  ----------
                                 ---------   ---------   ---------  ----------  ----------
Earnings to fixed charges. . .         6.3         6.2         5.0         2.6         2.9
                                 ---------   ---------   ---------  ----------  ----------
                                 ---------   ---------   ---------  ----------  ----------

</TABLE>

---------------------

(1)  Net fixed charges represents total fixed charges less capitalized interest
     and dividends on trust preferred securities.

(2)  The interest factor of rental expense has been calculated using the rate
     implied pursuant to the terms of the rental agreements.  For the periods
     presented, the interest factor ranged from 30% to 55% of total rental
     expense.
---

Exhibit 13.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to

Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer of Reg Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Reg Technologies Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Reg Technologies Inc.

Seattle, Washington.



by:  /s/ James Vandeberg

November 13, 2009

James Vandeberg

Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reg Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Reg Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







---
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-09-178-CV

JO ANNA KANUI, INDIVIDUALLY, 					        APPELLANT

AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF 

KYLEIGH ROBERTS

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY 					         APPELLEES

AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES BY 

AND THROUGH CAREY COCKERELL, 

IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; STACI 

M . LOVE, CHRISTIN H. IVEY, REGENA 

ROBINSON, ALFRED FREEMAN, REGINA 

HARRIS, AND VERONICA TERRELL 

IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL 

CAPACITIES

	----------

	FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant’s “Motion For Voluntary Dismissal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MEIER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.    

DELIVERED:  July 9, 2009
Exhibit 23.1:

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Hudson Technologies, Inc.

Pearl River, New York

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-17133, No. 333-38598 and No. 333-129057) of Hudson Technologies, Inc. of our report dated March 7, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007.



/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP



|Valhalla New York
|-----------------
|March 12, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report of VizConnect, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Henderson, Treasurer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of VizConnect, Inc.







Date: July 11, 2013





/s/ James HendersonJames HendersonTreasurer

(Principal Executive Officer)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.06 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of
Wireless Attachments, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, I, Steve S. Sinohui, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



1) This report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained in this report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Steve S. Sinohui
Steve S. Sinohui, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer





|Date: January 7, 2014
|---------------------















A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.