alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit


EXHIBIT 10.17.4






November 10, 2015


Mr. David Heede
Weaver View
Bentley Fold
Ellastone
Ashbourne
Derbyshire
DE62GX


Dear David:


I would like to confirm the terms of your key compensation components as agreed to by the management of Molson Coors Brewing Company (“Molson Coors”) in connection with your assignment as the interim Chief Financial Officer of Molson Coors, which you will assume as of November 16, 2015.  At the end of the assignment, you will return to your role as Chief Financial Officer of Molson Coors Europe, though others may cover those duties on an interim basis during your assignment.
		
	•
	Monthly Retainer.  You will receive an additional stipend of GBP 10,000 (gross) per month during the period of the assignment.  This amount will be paid by your current payroll in the UK, following normal payroll procedures.  There will be no changes to your base salary, MCIP or LTIP targets or plan entities as a result of the assignment. 




		
	•
	T&E and Housing.  Molson Coors will provide or otherwise reimburse you for all necessary travel and entertainment expenses arising as a result of the assignment, including reasonable travel costs for your family (with CPLO approval).  For the term of the assignment, Molson Coors will also provide you with short-term housing or otherwise reimburse you for hotel costs in the Denver area.




We are in the process of having the Compensation and Human Resources Committee formally approve this, which we anticipate shortly.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions.


Best Regards,
Mark Hunter
cc:  Sam Walker




Acknowledged and Agreed:


/s/ David A. Heede
David A. Heede
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 30, 2011

d0323 

# Order

March 30, 2011

141774

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141774 COA: 297812 Kalamazoo CC: 2004-002417-FC HYLAND STEPHEN STERLING, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 18, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 598 

To prohibit royalty incentives for deepwater drilling, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2013 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mr. NELSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit royalty incentives for deepwater drilling, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deepwater Drilling 

5 Royalty Relief Prohibition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ROYALTY INCENTIVES FOR DEEP7 WATER DRILLING. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue 

10 any oil or gas lease sale under the Outer Continental Shelf 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 598 IS

1 Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.) with royalty-based 

2 incentives in any tract located in water depths of 400 me3 ters or more on the outer Continental Shelf. 

4 (b) ROYALTY RELIEF FOR DEEPWATER PRODUC5 TION.—Section 345 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

6 U.S.C. 15905) is repealed. 

7 (c) ROYALTY RELIEF.—Section 8(a)(3) of the Outer 

8 Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)) is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(D) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding 

11 subparagraphs (A) through (C) or any other 

12 provision of law, the Secretary shall not reduce 

13 or eliminate any royalty or net profit share for 

14 any lease or unit located in water depths of 400 

15 meters or more on the outer Continental 

16 Shelf.’’. 

17 (d) APPLICATION.—This section and the amend18 ments made by this section— 

19 (1) apply beginning with the first lease sale 

20 held on or after the date of enactment of this Act 

21 for which a final notice of sale has not been pub22 lished as of that date; and 

23 (2) do not apply to a lease in effect on the date 

24 of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
S. 885 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 35 Park 

Street in Danville, Vermont, as the ‘‘Thaddeus Stevens Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. THADDEUS STEVENS POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 35 Park Street in Danville, Vermont, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘Thaddeus Stevens Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Thaddeus Stevens Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Order issued May 29 , 2013

.

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 13

- 00421

- CV

——————————— IN RE JULIE NICOLE V IRGIN AND GREG ENOS , Relator s

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

ORDER 1

Lance Whitworth, t he real party in interest
, has requested that we abate the
mandamus to allow for consideration of the challenged rulings by the successor
judge. He indicates that his motion is unopposed and certifies that he conferred
with all of the parties to the case, including the Attorney Ge neral and the relator s,
Julie Nicole Virgin and Greg Enos.

1 The underlying case is In re K.V.
, cause number 07FD2250, pending in the County Court at Law No

. 3 of Galveston County, Texas, the Hon. Christopher Dupuy presiding.2

Based on the foregoing, we abate this mandamus proceeding until May 31,

2013 and order that the relators and the real party in interest provide this Court
with a status report by 5:00 P.M. on tha t date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jane Bland Justice

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland.
EX-10.21(iv)



 Exhibit 10.21(iv) 
  





 
 Re: Bridge Loan Agreement 

September 1, 2015 
 This Bridge Agreement
(this “Agreement”) is entered into effect on September 1, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Protagenic Therapeutics Inc, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Dr. Garo H. Armen (the
“Lender”). 
 WHEREAS, the Lender, pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, will lend the Company an aggregate amount of one
hundred thirty five thousand and three hundred one Dollars (US$ 135,301) (the “Loan Amount”). The loan (the “Loan”) shall be convertible into securities of the Company on the terms and conditions set forth herein. This loan will
bear interest rate of 10% (ten percent) per annum. 
 Protagenic Therapeutics agrees to guarantee the payment of all principal and accrued interest in the
form of shares of its Common Stock, $0.001 par value (“Common Stock”.) at a purchase price of $1.25 per share (“the Shares”) upon competing its next fundraising round. 

The proceeds will be used to fund the research and development and some operational activities for Protagenic Therapeutics Inc. 

The Lender will lend the Company the Loan Amount in three installments: (a) $25,000 upon signature of the agreement, (b) $64,450 on Sep 18, 2015 and
(c) $45,851 on Oct. 13, 2015. 
 This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, U.S.A., without
regard to any choice of law principle that would dictate the application of the law of another jurisdiction. The parties agree that any action, suit or other legal proceeding that is commenced to resolve any matter arising under or relating to any
provision of this Agreement shall be commenced only in a court of the State of New York (or, if appropriate, a federal court located within the State of New York), and each party consents to the jurisdiction of such court. 

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which together shall be considered one and the same
agreement. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. 

 

							
	 Dr. Garo H Armen
  

Print Name:

    Garo H. Armen
  

Signature:

    /s/ Garo H. Armen
	 		 		 	 PROTAGENIC THERAPEUTICS, INC.
 By: Dr.
Robert Ziroyan
  
 Print Name:

    Robert Ziroyan
  

Signature:

    /s/ Robert Ziroyan
  

Title: Chief Operating Officer and Interim President


 Protagenic Therapeutics Inc., 149 5th Avenue, Suite 500, New York, NY 10010 

Tel: 416-500-3305; Fax: 508.734.2177, www.protagenic.com
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, John Brenholt, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Florida East Coast Holdings Corp.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    [Deleted as permissible under Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)];

 

c)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  August 15, 2011

 
| /s/ John Brenholt             |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| John Brenholt                 |   |
| Chief Financial Officer       |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer) |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Netco Investments, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary Freeman,
Chief Executive Officer and acting Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of
the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2011
                                      /s/ Gary Freeman
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Gary Freeman
                                      Chief Executive Officer,
                                      Principal Executive Officer and acting
                                      Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1996 AND AS OF
MARCH 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000925660
<NAME> NANOTECH CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 70
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       425
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,429)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   70
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (224)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (224)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (224)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        




                     

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, October 25, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee will be held Thursday, October 25, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. For more information please contact Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087, or write TAP Office 1114 Commerce Street, Dallas, TX 75242-1021, or post comments to the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various committee issues for submission to the IRS and other TAP related topics. Public input is welcomed.

Dated: September 1, 2018.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2018-19633 Filed 9-10-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7183

JAMES A. COCHRAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1415-AM) Submitted: February 27, 2004 Decided: March 24, 2004 Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James A. Cochran, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: James A. Cochran seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cochran has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. CP17-495-000; CP17-494-000]

On September 21, 2017, Jordan Cove Energy Project, L.P. filed an application in Docket No. CP17-495-000, pursuant to section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part 153 of the Commission's regulations, for authorization to site, construct and operate a liquefied natural gas export terminal and associated facilities on the bay side of the North Spit of Coos Bay in unincorporated Coos County, Oregon. On the same day, Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline, LP filed an application in Docket No. CP17-494-000 requesting a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, pursuant to section 7(c) of the NGA and Parts 157 and 284 of the Commission's regulations, to construct, operate, and maintain an approximately 220-mile-long natural gas pipeline to be located in Klamath, Jackson, Douglas, and Coos Counties, Oregon. The combined proposed projects, known as the Jordan Cove Project (Project), would liquefy and export about 7.8 million metric tons of natural gas per annum.

In accordance with Title 41 of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act, enacted on December 4, 2015, agencies are to publish completion dates for all federal environmental reviews and authorizations. This notice identifies the Commission's anticipated schedule for issuance of the final order for the Project, which is based on the anticipated date of issuance of the final Environmental Impact Statement. Accordingly, we currently anticipate issuing a final order for the Project no later than:

Issuance of Final Order—November 29, 2019

If a schedule change becomes necessary for the final order, an additional notice will be provided so that interested parties and government agencies are kept informed of the Project's progress.

Dated: August 31, 2018.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-19404 Filed 9-6-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P