alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Rural Business-Cooperative Service

###### Rural Housing Service

###### Rural Utilities Service

# AGENCY:

Rural Business-Cooperative Service, Rural Housing Service, and Rural Utilities Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects one item in the initial notice that published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 17, 2018, entitled “Rural Development Cooperative Agreement Program.” This correction revises the maximum available points for one scoring criteria.                    

# DATES:

Effective September 6, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Christine Sorensen, Regional Coordinator,                         *christine.sorensen@wdc.usda.gov,*                         (202) 568-9832.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 2018-17765 appearing on page 41046 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 16, 2018, make the following correction:                

## Correction

On page 41052 in the second column, third paragraph, section d. reads “The applicant will demonstrate how their proposal will utilize partnerships outside of RD . . . (10 points),” replace with “The applicant will demonstrate how their proposal will utilize partnerships outside of RD . . . (5 points).”

Dated: August 30, 2018.

Joby Young, 

Chief of Staff, USDA Rural Development.

[FR Doc. 2018-19357 Filed 9-5-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3410-XY-P
Order filed February 27, 2020

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00912-CV

____________

KAREN KRISTINE SILVIO, Appellant

V.

BIRNAM WOOD-FAIRFAX HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., 

Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1046607

O R D E R

On December 16, 2014, this court abated this appeal because appellant

petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the 

Southern District of Texas, under cause number 14-36744. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. 

Through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system, 

the court has learned that the bankruptcy case was closed. The parties did not

advise this court of the bankruptcy court action.
Unless within 20 days of the date of this order any party to the appeal files a 

motion demonstrating good cause to retain this appeal, this appeal will be 

reinstated and dismissed for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant.
Order entered September 2, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01672-CR

No. 05-13-01720-CR

FRANCISCO JAVIER ESCOBAR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-59278-M, F11-71776-M 

ORDER

These appeals are REINSTATED. We VACATE our order of July 30, 2014 requiring 

the trial court to make findings of fact regarding why appellant’s brief was not filed. 

Appellant’s August 28, 2014 motion to rescind abatement and to file his brief is 

GRANTED. Appellant’s brief received by the Clerk of the Court on August 28, 2014 is 

DEEMED timely filed on the date of this order. The supplemental clerk’s records containing 

the certifications of the right to appeal and the amended notices of appeal have been filed.

The State’s brief shall be due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Midstream Partners, LP; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, this Form 10-Q/A does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Form 10-Q/A; and |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Form 10-Q/A, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Form 10-Q/A. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Date:  | December 12, 2017 | /s/ Lynn L. Bourdon III |
|   |   |   |
|   |   | Lynn L. Bourdon III |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer of |
|   |   | American Midstream GP, LLC |
|   |   | (the general partner of |
|   |   | American Midstream Partners, LP) |
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00679-CV

In re Tony Cervantes

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM MILAM COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Tony Cervantes seeks a writ ordering the district clerk to provide him with twentyfive categories of documents from his previous trial in which he was convicted of indecency with

a child by contact. He was sentenced to twenty-five years as a habitual felon. Cervantes asserts that

he wishes to use these documents to assist him in preparing a petition for writ of habeas corpus. 

Because we conclude that Cervantes has not shown that the district clerk has failed to perform a

ministerial duty, we deny the petition.

We have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk

unless such is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, such as ordering the clerk to file or forward a

notice of appeal. See In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999,

orig. proceeding); In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998,

orig. proceeding). In orderfor mandamus to issue, the party seekingmandamus must show that there

is no other adequate remedy available and that the act sought to be mandated is ministerial. Whitsitt

v. Ramsay, 719 S.W.2d 333, 335 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986) (orig. proceeding). Before mandamus

relief may issue, the petitioner must establish that the district court (1) had a legal duty to perform
a non-discretionary act, (2) was asked to perform the act, and (3) failed or refused to do so. 

O’Connor v. First Court of Appeals, 837 S.W.2d 94, 97 (Tex. 1992). 

Cervantes demands a broad range of documents. He wants such documents as the

motion to withdraw by his attorney as well as the order on that ruling, lab reports and rape kits, and

his attorney’s pretrial records such as phone logs. These documents do not appear to be necessary

to determine whether this Court has jurisdiction over an appeal or original proceeding. Further,

although he claims he has requested a number of documents from the clerk’s office, it is not clear

from his petition that they are the same documents he requests in his petition. It is also not clear that

either the clerk or the reporter has such documents as phone logs. We do not appear to have

jurisdiction to provide the relief Cervantes requests and he has not shown that he has requested that

the district clerk perform a ministerial duty and failed to do so. Cervantes has not shown himself

entitled to mandamus relief.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Filed: January 8, 2010

2
Telephone Conversation

Phillip Esdaile

phil@davisairrepair .com

530 979 0893

I contacted Mr. Esdaile on April 14, 2016. Discussed the exemption request submitted in an effort to 

understand the reason why the request is being made. The exemption is for 91.409b to increase the 

inspection interval to 150 hours on a Cessna 208 model aircraft. They operate aircraft with the Pratt 

and Whitney PT6 and Garrett TPE -331 model engines. He believes the aircraft are over maintained 

and could cause problems in maintenance due to the frequent disassembly of the aircraft. He thinks it 

could be improve reliability of the aircraft by moving the inspection intervals out to 150 hours. Mr. 

Esdaile could not provide any additional data to support his request. He thinks he can produce the 

additional data to support the request. I explained he would need to provide data from Cessna and the 

engine manufacturer to support a program for the exemption. I also explained it may be in his best 

interest to create a program and get it approved by his local office. He stated it would be costly to 

develop a program and get it approved. I instructed him I would need the data to support the 

exemption within 10 days to proceed with the request.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3013803-NOV-201009:18 AM
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidus Investment Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward H. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Shelby E. Sherard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: August 4, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ EDWARD H. ROSS                          
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Edward H. Ross                              
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer        
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                     |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ SHELBY E. SHERARD                       
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Shelby E. Sherard                           
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidus Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2022, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward H. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Shelby E. Sherard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                   |                                              |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| Date: May 5, 2022 | /s/ EDWARD H. ROSS                           |
|              | Edward H. Ross                               |
|              | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer         |
|              | (Principal Executive Officer)                |
|              |                                         |
|              | /s/ SHELBY E. SHERARD                        |
|              | Shelby E. Sherard                            |
|              | Chief Financial Officer                      |
|              | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 305I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 305I |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 64° anno30 luglio 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 305I

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

64° anno30 luglio 2021

---

| Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Comunicazioni |
| | DICHIARAZIONI COMUNI |
| | Consiglio |
| 2021/C 305 I/01 | Dichiarazione comune del Parlamento europeo e della Commissione | 1 |

Sommario

pagina

II   Comunicazioni

DICHIARAZIONI COMUNI

Consiglio

2021/C 305 I/01

Dichiarazione comune del Parlamento europeo e della Commissione

1

---

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

II Comunicazioni

DICHIARAZIONI COMUNI

Consiglio

| 30.7.2021 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CI 305/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2021

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CI 305/1

---

Dichiarazione comune del Parlamento europeo e della Commissione

(2021/C 305 I/01)

Qualora le risorse cumulate previste dalle entrate con destinazione specifica differiscano sostanzialmente dall’importo di cui all’articolo 4, paragrafo 1, lettera b), il Parlamento, sulla base di una proposta della Commissione, individuerà e sosterrà l’assegnazione allo strumento, conformemente all’articolo 314 TFUE, delle risorse complementari necessarie per far fronte al fabbisogno di finanziamento dello strumento e garantirne la piena attuazione. La proposta della Commissione sarà coerente con il quadro finanziario pluriennale e non comprometterà l’attuazione dei programmi elencati nell’allegato I del Regolamento (UE) 2021/1229 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 14 luglio 2021, relativo allo strumento di prestito per il settore pubblico nel quadro del meccanismo per una transizione giusta.

---
SERVED AUGUST 27, 20 lO 

DtmRTMENTOF 

•fiANSPORWION 

'GKET OPERATIONS 

1101 30 A !l:33 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

RBK DEVELOPMENT, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10SO0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0I99 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On March 9, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter 

"Complainant") filed a Complaint. On March 1, 2010, Respondent RBK Development, 

Inc. (hereinafter "Respondent") had requested a hearing. On August 26, 2010, 

Complainant withdrew its Complaint, citing settlement. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Complaint having been read and 

considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Complainant's Withdrawal of Complaint be and is hereby granted; and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 
SO ORDERED. 

l^ciUeu^ \,{r^(iLuJy 

^ 

Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10SO0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Stephen R. Snyder, Respondent's Counsel 

Snyder, Birch & Morgan, LLP 

200 West Main Street 

Syracuse, IN 46567 

TEL: 574-457-3300 

FAX: 574-457-2056 

Rashawn Rich George, Complainant's Counsel 

Southern Region, ASO-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor 

RoomE12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202 366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. MaiL For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Nathan Jerry WILLIAMS, Jr.

No. 53697.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 29, 1973.

Christopher H. Foreman, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., LeRoy A. Hartley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Knowles M. Tucker, Dist. Atty., Dracos D. Burke, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

SANDERS, Chief Justice.

The defendant, Nathan Jerry Williams, Jr., was indicted and tried for aggravated battery. See LSA-R.S. 14:34. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and the court sentenced the defendant to serve eight years in the state penitentiary. The defendant has appealed the conviction and sentence.

No bills of exceptions are presented for review. One bill was reserved when defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied by the trial court. That bill of exceptions, however, was not perfected as required by LSA-C.Cr.P. Arts. 845 and 920. We are therefore limited in our review to errors discoverable by inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without examination of the evidence. LSA-C. Cr.P. Art. 920.

We have inspected the record for such errors. We note that the delay for sentencing was not waived and that the sentence was imposed on the same day as the denial of the motion for a new trial, in violation of Article 873 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure. This error invalidates the sentence, and the case *595must therefore be remanded for resentenc-ing.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction is affirmed. The sentence is set aside, and the case is remanded to the Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Iberia, for resentencing in conformity with law.
Exhibit
24.01


POWER OF
ATTORNEY
  Each
person whose signature appears below, constitutes and appoints Adrian Sarbu and
Wallace Macmillan, and each of them, with full power to act without the other,
such person’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2008 of
Central European Media Enterprises Ltd., a Bermuda corporation, and any and all
amendments to such Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform
each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, thereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or any
of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.
  February
25, 2009
  /s/
      Ronald S. Lauder
                
                /s/
      Herb Granath__________________
                
                __________________Ronald
      S. Lauder
                
                Herbert
      A. Granath/s/
      Adrian Sarbu
                
                /s/
      Wallace Macmillan__________________
                
                __________________Adrian
      Sarbu
                
                Wallace
      Macmillan/s/
      Frank Ehmer
                
                /s/
      Charles Frank__________________
                
                __________________Frank
      Ehmer
                
                Charles
      Frank/s/
      Igor Kolomoisky
                
                /s/
      Herbert Kloiber__________________
                
                __________________Igor
      Kolomoisky
                
                Herbert
      Kloiber/s/
      Alfred W. Langer
                
                /s/
      Bruce Maggin__________________
                
                __________________Alfred
      W. Langer
                
                Bruce
      Maggin/s/
      Ann Mather
                
                /s/
      Duco Sickinghe__________________
                
                __________________Ann
      Mather
                
                Duco
      Sickinghe/s/
      Christian Stahl
                
                /s/
      Eric Zinterhofer__________________
                
                __________________Christian
      Stahl
                
                Eric
      Zinterhofer
called the Torrent N268MT Motor powered glider fixed wing aircraft in the following areas: 

1. Merrill will be applying for exemption from 14 CFR part 61.113 the requirement for a commercial private 

pilot license. 

2. Merrill will be applying for exemption from 14 CFR part 91.121 Altimeter setting. 

3. Merrill will be applying for exemption from 14 CFR part 91.119 Minimum Safe Altitudes, Paragraph (c) and 

(d). 

4. Merrill will be applying for exemption from 14 CFR part 91.151 Fuel reserve requirements for VFR 

conditions. 

Merrill is committed to the safe use ofUAS aircraft and by no means looking to circumvent the currant FAA 

regulation. Merrill believes the listed item however place an undue burden that is unnecessary for this size and class of 

UAS. These exemptions would be the only changes made to the Airworthiness consideration that would be different to 

the original application request that was submitted and approved on 12/04/2014 and have since then been deemed 

necessary in most cases by the FAA for 333 exemption applicants. There will be no effect on the operational safety 

caused by these exemptions. Merrill Aviation & Defense believes that by allowing Merrill Aviation & Defense to 

operate the Torrent UAS with these requested exemption it will allow MA&D to continue its UAS design and research 

and manufacturing process with less restriction and will in turn allow MA&D to bring more jobs to an otherwise 

depressed area of Michigan due to the reduced Auto Industry activity in the local area. The proposed operations are 

previously defined in the FAA approved program letter dated 11/ 13/2015 and the area of operation authorized on FAA 

form 7711-1 UAS COA for Special Airworthiness Certificate. 

Sincerely b · \) James D Peters :0. \ 

Unmanned Aircra Program Design 7/ ZO \ .S: 

j peters@merrilltg.com 

(989)791-6676 Ext. 5019 

I 0:!3 South Wheeler Street, Sagma\\. Ml 48602 Ph: Fx: 989.9:! 1.1488 

1463 South State Road 45, Spnng.,illc. IN Ph: Flt: 812.825.4369 

wv. '" .McrriliTG.com