alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6838

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM HORACE JOHNSON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (CR-04-28-4-1-H; CA-96-178-1)

Submitted: February 16, 2006 Decided: February 21, 2006

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Horace Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

William Horace Johnson seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his motion under Fed R. Civ. P. 60(b) seeking

reconsideration of the court’s prior order denying habeas relief

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days

after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order,

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is

“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of

Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson,

361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

September 28, 2004. The notice of appeal was filed on March 24,

2005. Because Johnson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-K of Security Bank Corporation (the Company) for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), H. Averett Walker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James R. McLemore, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    H. AVERETT WALKERH. AVERETT WALKERChief Executive OfficerMarch 16, 2006/s/    JAMES R.
MCLEMOREJAMES R. McLEMOREChief Financial and Accounting OfficerMarch 16, 2006




This certification accompanies
this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 178 (Thursday, September 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46532-46533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19935]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15684 and #15685; Havasupai Tribe Disaster 
Number AZ-00056]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the Havasupai Tribe

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Havasupai Tribe (FEMA--
4389--DR), dated 08/31/2018.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and Landslides.
    Incident Period: 07/11/2018 through 07/12/2018.

DATES: Issued on 08/31/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/30/2018.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/31/2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 08/31/2018, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Area: Havasupai Tribe
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 156846 
and for economic injury is 156850.


[[Page 46533]]


(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2018-19935 Filed 9-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
2200 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 300 • Arlington, Virginia • 22201 • 703.893.6600 • Fax 703.821.8236

June 6, 2023

Mr. Matthew C. Trout

U.S. International Development Finance Corporation

1100 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20527

Dear Mr. Trout,

This letter is to attest that SC&A, Inc. (SC&A) performed an independent assessment of 

greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of projects supported by the U.S. International Development 

Finance Corporation (DFC), formerly the U.S. Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC).

The scope of the calendar year 2021 GHG inventory included direct emissions, most notably from 

fossil fuel combustion, from active and operational projects having a maximum potential-to-emit

equal or greater than 25,000 short tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year. “Active” 

projects were defined as all insurance contracts in force and all guaranty and direct loans with an 

outstanding principal balance at the end of DFC/OPIC’s last fiscal year (i.e., September 30, 2022). 

Excluded from the scope of the inventory were direct biogenic emissions, refrigerant losses, 

process/chemical releases (e.g., methane from wastewater treatment plants), indirect emissions 

related to purchased electricity or heat supply (including steam), and emissions from a project’s 

construction.

SC&A developed project-level GHG emission estimates that were consistent with DFC/OPIC’s 

carbon disclosure policy and procedures as well as industry good practices. The Calendar Year 

2021 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Report completed by SC&A in June 2023 documents 

project-specific methodologies, data sources and assumptions. 

SC&A attests that total GHG emissions of the calendar year 2021 GHG inventory amount to

10,247,274 short tons of CO2e. SC&A further provides reasonable assurance that the 2021 GHG 

inventory was developed in conformance with DFC/OPIC’s carbon disclosure policy.

Sincerely, 

Jackson Schreiber

Project Manager, GHG Verification & Sustainability 

SC&A, Inc.
EXHIBIT
32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report
of Montalvo Spirits, Inc. (formerly known as Advanced Cloud Storage, Inc.) (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period
ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Carlos Gonzalez Rivera, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: April 25, 2013 |  | /s/ Carlos Gonzalez Rivera                                                                            
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | Name: Carlos Gonzalez Rivera                                                                          
|                     |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Felix Owens, Appellant.

Casey, J. P.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.), rendered January 29, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree.

Defendant contends that the *8 Vs to*25-year prison sentence imposed upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree is excessive and should be reduced in the interest of justice. We disagree.

*884Following the death of defendant’s mother as a result of gunshot wounds inflicted by defendant when she surprised him in the act of burglarizing the house she shared with her boyfriend, defendant was indicted on a number of charges, including murder in the second degree. A plea bargain resulted in defendant’s plea of guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree in full satisfaction of the indictment and upon the understanding that his prison sentence would be no greater than *8V3*to 25 years. According to defendant, the crime was the result of an irrational act of violence against his mother which was the culmination of a lifetime of parental rejection and neglect. According to defendant, it was therefore an abuse of discretion to sentence him to the maximum possible sentence for the class B felony to which he entered his plea because his actions on the day of his mother’s death "were isolated acts committed under extreme emotional disturbance and were at complete variance with the rest of his life”.

In our view, however, defendant received a measure of leniency when he was permitted to plead guilty to the crime of manslaughter in the first degree in full satisfaction of a multicount indictment that included the A-I felony of murder in the second degree, which carried a prison sentence of at least 15 years to life *(see, People v Alvarado,*122 AD2d 429, *lv denied*68 NY2d 998; *People v Paige,*92 AD2d 653). In imposing sentence, County Court limited the minimum term of imprisonment to one third of the maximum term, even though the crime to which defendant entered his plea was a class B armed felony offense subject to a minimum term of up to one half of the maximum term (Penal Law § 70.02 [4]). That the sentencing court appears to have relied more upon the deterrent value of the sentence than upon societal protection and rehabilitation does not justify appellate interference with the sentence where, as here, it is clear that the court performed the delicate balancing necessary to accommodate the public and private interests involved in the sentencing process *(see, People v Andrews,*115 AD2d 807). We see neither a clear abuse of discretion in the sentence imposed nor any basis for exercising our power to modify the sentence in the interest of justice.

Judgment affirmed. Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ASTRA VENTURES, INC. for the quarter ended August 31, 2012, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:




(1) the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ASTRA VENTURES, INC. for the quarter ended August 31, 2012 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2012 presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ASTRA VENTURES, INC.




By:  /s/ Qinzhen Li


Name: Qinzhen Li


Title:   Chief Financial Officer


Dated: October 15, 2012
##### 



Exhibit 23

Independent Auditors Consent

The Board of Directors
DiamondCluster International, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-31965, No. 333-88155, No. 333-92213, No. 333-50834, No. 333-47830, No.
333-64276, and No. 333-64278) on Form S-8 of DiamondCluster International, Inc.
of our reports dated April 25, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of DiamondCluster International, Inc. as of March 31, 2002 and 2003, and
the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income
(loss), stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 31, 2003, and the related schedule, which reports
appear in the March 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of DiamondCluster
International, Inc. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph that
describes the Companys adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, as of April 1, 2002.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
June 24, 2003
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 9 -00 170 -CR Eve r ado Ro dr igu e z , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- DC-07 -20 5910 , HO NORAB LE WI LF ORD F LOW ERS , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E MO R

A N D UMO P I N I O N Evera do Rodrigue z seeks to appea l a judgment of conviction for f ailing to stop and rende r aid. The trial court ha s cer tified that: (1) this is a plea ba rg ain ca se and Rodrigue z has no right of appea l, a

nd (2) Rodrigue z wa ived the rig ht of appea l. The appe al is dismis sed. SeeTe x. R. App. P. 25.2(a)( 2), (d) .

________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Apr il 16, 2009 Do Not Publish
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Martin Leake, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Carey, J.), rendered January 30, 1990, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidus Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward H. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Shelby E. Sherard, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 
Date: August 6, 2020  
/s/ EDWARD H. ROSS
  Edward H. Ross  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)  
/s/ SHELBY E. SHERARD
  Shelby E. Sherard  Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)**
**Exhibit
31.02**





**CERTIFICATIONS**





I,
Wallace Macmillan, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 3 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Central
European Media Enterprises Ltd.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors:





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.








/s/
      Wallace MacmillanWallace
      MacmillanChief
      Financial OfficerApril
      7, 2005
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.2





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT






We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-56271, 33-57177, 33-57399, 33-63139, 33-64127, 33-65311, 33-65493,
333-00265, 333-00835, 333-06723, 333-07615, 333-27039, 333-29849, 333-40131,
333-41435, 333-44745, 333-56635, 333-70999 and 333-71199) on Form S-3, the
Registration Statement No. 333-64297 on Form S-4, and the Registration
Statements (Nos. 33-44543, 33-54263, 33-60839, 33-60843, 33-64827, 33-64829,
33-64831, 33-65485, 33-65487, 333-06177, 333-06179, 333-16025, 333-16027,
333-40141, 333-42917 and 333-58083) on Form S-8 of Tele-Communications, Inc. of
our report dated February 2, 1999 on the consolidated financial statements of
Sprint Spectrum Holding Company, L. P. and subsidiaries for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1998 appearing in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Tele-Communications, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998.





Deloitte & Touche LLP
Kansas City, Missouri


March 15, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-26-1997
<CASH>                                          14,598
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,564
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,128
<INVENTORY>                                      6,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,759
<PP&E>                                         436,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 494,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,295
<BONDS>                                        226,487
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   494,436
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               243,634
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  200,496
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   664
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,303
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,252
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,051
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,943)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
        

</TABLE>