alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Millenko Mijatovic et al., Respondents, v Joseph Noonan, as Executor of Emil V. Henden, Deceased, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In an action, *inter alia,*for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated June 27, 1989, as denied that branch of his motion which was to strike the plaintiffs’ complaint and cancel the notice of pendency filed by the plaintiffs for failure to respond to certain discovery demands.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly refused to compel the plaintiffs to respond to interrogatories numbered 3, 4, 5 and 6 or to comply with the appellant’s demands for production of documents relating to the plaintiffs’ finances.

The propriety of interrogatories depends upon the extent of the material requested, and whether that material is reasonably necessary in preparing the prosecution or defense of an action *(see, Fellner v Texas Mexican Ry. Co.,*76 AD2d 820). Interrogatories which call for opinions or conclusions of law, rather than relevant facts, should be stricken *(see, Lilling v Syracuse Bros. Dev. Corp.,*114 AD2d 938, 938-939; *Pineda v Roerig & Co.,*43 AD2d 827). Here, interrogatories numbered 3, *8074 and 5 request conclusions and opinions unrelated to the facts which the plaintiffs must prove in their specific performance action. At the trial, the plaintiffs herein must demonstrate that there was a valid contract of sale and that they were ready, willing and able to tender performance and close title thereunder, i.e. that they had the requisite funds or financial commitments *(see, Jewell v Rowe,*119 AD2d 634, 635). Interrogatory numbered 6, demanding that the plaintiffs identify all of their assets and liabilities from November 1985 to the present and items aa and bb of the appellant’s notice for discovery and inspection demanding "complete documents relating to the finances of plaintiffs from November, 1985 until present” and "all monthly statements since November 1985 for any and all of plaintiffs’ bank accounts” are overly broad in that they seek far more information than that needed by the appellant. It will be incumbent upon the plaintiffs to demonstrate that they had the "requisite funds or financial commitments from others in order to meet [their] obligations” *(Jewell v Rowe, supra,*at 635). Moreover, discovery demands such as these, which contain all-inclusive demands for documents of every kind for information substantially in excess of that to which the requesting party is entitled, are generally stricken in their entirety *(see, Schnur v Neuberger & Berman,*114 AD2d 495, 496; *Brandon v Chefetz,*101 AD2d 786; *Metzger v Brockman,*92 AD2d 499, 500). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 

AMENDED SCHEDULE 4.2(a)(2) TO FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED 

AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 

DESIGNATION OF 
 7.50%
SERIES B CUMULATIVE REDEEMABLE PREFERRED UNITS 
 Gladstone Commercial Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership (the
“Partnership”) hereby amends Schedule 4.2(a)(2) (the “Original Schedule”) to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the “Partnership Agreement) as follows: 

 

	(a)	Section (i) is replaced with the following language: 

 Reclassification. A series
of Preferred Units, designated the “7.50% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units” (the “Series B Preferred Units”), is hereby established. 1,600,000 designated but unissued units of Senior Common Units of the
Partnership is hereby reclassified and designated as the Series B Preferred Units in addition to 1,150,000 previously designated units. The number of Series B Preferred Units shall be 2,750,000 with all preferences, conversion and other rights,
voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption as set forth in the Original Schedule and the Partnership Agreement. 

 

	(b)	General. This amendment has been approved by GCLP Business Trust II, a Massachusetts business trust, and General Partner of the Partnership pursuant to the Partnership Agreement.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.4 MB)

Tags:fort belvoir, McNamara Headquarters Complex, DLA Headquarters, Asian-American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month, Dong Xiang, People and Culture

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT
32.1



Certification
of Principal Financial and Executive Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of PetVivo Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June
30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John Lai,
President, CFO and Principal Financial and Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
    of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|Date:
    December 10, 2018 | By: | /s/
                                         John Lai                                                             
|--------------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                            |     | John Lai




        

President, CFO and Director




        (Principal
        Financial and Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         925,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,136,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,262,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,434,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,987,000
<PP&E>                                       6,828,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,443,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,693,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,895,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,702,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,693,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,814,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,466,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             662,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,201,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (977,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,224,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,224,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.57)
        



</TABLE>
VI 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 72 

For the relief of Luay Hadad. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2013 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Luay Hadad. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for the purposes of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Luay Hadad shall 

7 be deemed to have been lawfully admitted to, and re8 mained in, the United States, and shall be eligible for ad9 justment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted 

10 for permanent residence under section 245 of the Immi11 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) upon filing 

12 an application for such adjustment of status. 


smartinez on DSK6TPVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 72 IS

1 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub2 section (a) shall apply only if the application for adjust3 ment of status is filed with appropriate fees not later than 

4 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

5 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

6 Upon the granting of permanent resident status to Luay 

7 Hadad, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 

8 officer to reduce by 1, during the current or next following 

9 fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

10 made available to natives of the country of the birth of 

11 Luay Hadad under section 202(a)(2) of the Immigration 

12 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPVN1PROD with
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the quarterly report of Blue Sun Media, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Elise Travertini,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

May 6, 2011                             /s/ Elise Travertini
                                        --------------------
                                        Elise Travertini, President, Principal
                                        Executive Officer, Principal Financial
                                        and Accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 14

- 00141

- CV

BANK OF AMERICA N.A.

, Appellant

v. TFHSP LLC SERIES 11239Appellee TFHSP LLC SERIES 11239

, Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 14190 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 9, 2014

VACATED AND REMANDED

In this restricted appeal, appellant Bank of America N.A. appeals the trial court’s default

judgment of November 27, 2013

, in favor of appellee TFHSP LLC Series 11239. In their joint

motion, the parties move this court to vacate the trial court’s judgment and rem and this cause for

further proceedings. W e grant the parties’ joint motion : w e vacate the trial court’s judgment and

remand this cause for further proceedings. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2) (A) ; 43.2(e).

PER CURIAM
#### Ruby BOHL, Petitioner, v. WALSH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 and the Board of Education of Walsh School District RE-1, Respondents.

No. 89SC416.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Jan. 16, 1990.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari GRANTED.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 827 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require oil polluters to 

pay the full cost of oil spills, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2013 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. NELSON, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. REED, and Mr. 

WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 

oil polluters to pay the full cost of oil spills, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Big Oil Bailout Pre5 vention Trust Fund Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OIL SPILL LIABILITY TRUST FUND. 

7 (a) LIMITATIONS ON EXPENDITURES AND AUTHOR8 ITY TO BORROW.—Section 9509 of the Internal Revenue 

9 Code of 1986 is amended— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 827 IS

1 (1) in subsection (c)— 

2 (A) by striking paragraph (2); 

3 (B) by striking ‘‘EXPENDITURES’’ and all 

4 that follows through ‘‘Amounts in’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘EXPENDITURES.—Amounts in’’; and 

6 (C) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) 

7 through (F) as paragraphs (1) through (6), re8 spectively, and indenting appropriately; 

9 (2) in subsection (d)— 

10 (A) by striking paragraph (2); 

11 (B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as 

12 paragraph (2); and 

13 (C) in paragraph (2) (as so redesig14 nated)— 

15 (i) by striking subparagraph (B); and 

16 (ii) by redesignating subparagraph 

17 (C) as subparagraph (B); and 

18 (3) in subsection (e)— 

19 (A) by striking ‘‘(or is unable by reason of 

20 subsection (c)(2))’’; and 

21 (B) by striking ‘‘and such subsection’’. 

22 SEC. 3. ADVANCE PAYMENTS. 

23 Section 1012 of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 

24 U.S.C. 2712) is amended by adding at the end the fol25 lowing: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 827 IS

1 ‘‘(m) ADVANCE PAYMENTS.—The President shall 

2 promulgate regulations that allow advance payments to be 

3 made from the Fund to States and political subdivisions 

4 of States for actions taken to prepare for and mitigate 

5 substantial threats from the discharge of oil.’’. 

6 SEC. 4. BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

7 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

8 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

9 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

10 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

11 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

12 by the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, pro13 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

14 vote on passage. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6290
DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARY ANN SAAR, Acting Secretary, D.P.S.C.S., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA03-517-8-PJM) Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 2, 2004 Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Gloria Wilson Shelton, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pearson v. Saar , No. CA-03-517-8-PJM (D. Md. Jan. 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Association et al., Appellants, v Dorothy Doering et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

In an action for a judgment declaring that a certain insurance policy was validly canceled, the plaintiffs appeal (1) from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.), dated April 28, 1989, which (a) granted the respondents’ respective motions for summary judgment, (b) denied the plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment, and (c) declared that the plaintiff Selective Insurance Company of *809America has a duty to defend and indemnify the defendant Richard L. Lam concerning an automobile accident which occurred on November 13, 1984, in the County of Queens, and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated October 26, 1989, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order and judgment dated April 28, 1989, is dismissed, as that order and judgment was superseded by the order dated October 26, 1989, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated October 26, 1989, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents Dorothy Doering, Henry Doering and Rosemary Bachman are awarded one bill of costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court’s determination that the plaintiff Selective Insurance Company of America should be equitably estopped from denying coverage under the policy issued to its insured Richard L. Lam *(see, Hartford Ins. Group v Mello,*81 AD2d 577; *cf., Schiff Assocs. v Flack,*51 NY2d 692). Since the policy in question was issued in New Jersey by a New Jersey insurer, we note that the law of that State applies to the question of whether there had been an effective cancellation *(see, Employers’ Liab. Assur. Corp. v Aresty,*11 AD2d 331, 333, *affd*11 NY2d 696). Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the plaintiff insurer would have been barred under applicable New Jersey law from asserting that the subject policy had been canceled *(see, Bonnet v Stewart,*68 NJ 287, 344 A2d 321; *Merchants Indem. Corp. v Eggleston,*37 NJ 114, 179 A2d 505). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly declared that the insurer has a duty to defend and indemnify Richard L. Lam concerning the accident which occurred on November 13, 1984. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet as of December 31, 1998, and statements of operations for the twelve
months ended December 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,286,299
<SECURITIES>                                   194,784
<RECEIVABLES>                                      614
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     26,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,537,672
<PP&E>                                          95,378
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,982)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,788,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          188,826
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,170
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,575,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,788,818
<SALES>                                         83,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,831
<CGS>                                           54,997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,364,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,342,393)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (61,881)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,280,512)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,280,512)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.33)
        

</TABLE>