alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: November 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 216)]
[Notices]               
[Page 68754-68755]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09no10-32]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Alabama Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a State Advisory 
Committee (SAC) planning meeting of the Alabama Advisory Committee to 
the Commission will convene by conference call at 11 a.m. and adjourn 
at approximately 12 p.m. on Tuesday, November 23, 2010. The purpose of 
this meeting is to continue planning a civil rights project.
    This meeting is available to the public through the following toll-
free call-in number: (866) 364-7584, conference call access code number 
21921588. Any interested member of the public may call this number and 
listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls 
they initiate over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund 
any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they 
initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. 
Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by 
first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing 
the Service with the conference call number and contact name Farella E. 
Robinson.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting 
Corrine Sanders of

[[Page 68755]]

the Central Regional Office and TTY/TDD telephone number, by 4 p.m. on 
November 16, 2010.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by December 8, 2010. 
The address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 400 State Avenue, Suite 
908, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Comments may be e-mailed to 
frobinson@usccr.gov. Records generated by this meeting may be inspected 
and reproduced at the Central Regional Office, as they become 
available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the 
work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's 
Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Central Regional 
Office at the above e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC on November 4, 2010.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-28219 Filed 11-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 

EXHIBIT A 
 GORDON E. DEVENS 

 

			
	Start Date:	  	February 9, 2016
		
	Employee:	  	Gordon E. Devens
		
	Position:	  	Chief Legal Officer of the Company
		
	Reporting Person:	  	Chief Executive Officer of the Company
		
	Base Salary:	  	$500,000
		
	2015 Bonus:	  	$650,000
		
	2015 Additional Bonus:	  	$1,000,000
		
	Target Bonus:	  	100% of Base Salary
		
	Prior Agreement:	  	Employment Agreement effective as of March 14, 2014, by and between the Company and Employee
		
	Sections of Prior Agreement
that survive with respect to
Equity Compensation
granted under the Prior
Agreement:	  	Section 3(c) and Section 3(d)
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.16
SIXTH AMENDMENT 
TO THE 
CATERPILLAR INC. 
SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN
Caterpillar Inc. (the “Company”) sponsors the Caterpillar Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan (formerly known as the Caterpillar Inc. Supplemental Pension Benefit Plan and hereinafter referred to as the “Plan”).  By a document dated December 17, 2007, the Plan was most recently amended and restated effective January 1, 2005.  The Plan has been subsequently amended on five separate occasions by documents dated November 1, 2010, July 30, 2012, December 13, 2012, December 5, 2013 and December 10, 2014.  Pursuant to Article VII of the Plan, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan in whole or in part, at any time.  By this instrument, the Company amends the Plan, with the consent of the affected Plan participant, to provide that if the person who occupies the position of Chief Executive Officer of the Company on the effective date hereof terminates employment prior to attainment of age 65 for any reason other than death or disability, the amount payable pursuant to the Plan shall be reduced for early retirement despite the provision of the Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan that otherwise provides for payment of an unreduced pension upon early retirement on or after the attainment of age 62.
1.This Sixth Amendment shall be effective as of the date of its execution.
2.    Section 3.4 of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to provide as follows:
“3.4    Early Retirement Reductions.
(a)    General.  Benefits determined pursuant to this Article III shall be subject to the same reductions for early commencement as applicable under RIP.
(b)    CEO.  Notwithstanding Section 3.4(a) or anything else herein to the contrary, if the employment of the person who occupied the position of Chief Executive Officer of the Company on the effective date of the Sixth Amendment to the January 1, 2005 restatement (the “CEO”) terminates for any reason other than death or Disability prior to the attainment of age 65, the benefit determined pursuant to this Article III shall be reduced in accordance with the early retirement provisions of RIP but substituting age 65 for age 62.  Upon termination of the CEO’s employment due to death or Disability, the benefits determined pursuant to this 







Article III for the CEO shall be subject to the same reductions for early retirement as applicable under RIP.”
3.    This Sixth Amendment amends only the provisions of the Plan as set forth herein, and those provisions not expressly amended shall be considered in full force and effect.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Sixth Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions and the intent of this Sixth Amendment.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kopjaggers Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Eggermont, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated:  August 14, 2012  /s/ John Eggermont John Eggermont Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit
13.1



Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to

Title
18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I,
Paul Chute, Chief Executive Officer of Reg Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The
    Annual Report on Form 20-F of Reg Technologies Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2018 (the “Report”) fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of Reg Technologies Inc.                                                                                   



|Date:
    November 1, 2018 | /s/
    “Paul Chute”         
|-------------------------- | -----------------------------
|                           | Paul
    Chute               
|                           | (Chief
    Executive Officer)



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reg Technologies Inc. and will be retained
by Reg Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[f10q093016_ex10z2001.jpg]   [f10q093016_ex10z2002.jpg]   [f10q093016_ex10z2003.jpg]   [f10q093016_ex10z2004.jpg]   [f10q093016_ex10z2005.jpg]   [f10q093016_ex10z2006.jpg]   [f10q093016_ex10z2007.jpg]   [f10q093016_ex10z2008.jpg]   [f10q093016_ex10z2009.jpg]   [f10q093016_ex10z2010.jpg]   [f10q093016_ex10z2011.jpg]
CERTIFICATION




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350




(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




I, Gregory H. Sachs, certify that:




1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SCG Financial Acquisition Corp.;




2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant have:




a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)       [Omitted pursuant to the transition period exemption for newly public companies;]




c)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




d)       Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:




a)       All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and









b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




Dated: May 20, 2011

/s/ Gregory H. SachsGregory H. SachsChief Executive Officer, Chairman and President(Principal executive officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Ortiz, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), rendered April 25, 1989, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 412 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 412

   To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds for constructing or 
   modifying highway signs that are expressed only in metric system 
                             measurements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Stump introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds for constructing or 
   modifying highway signs that are expressed only in metric system 
                             measurements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METRIC SYSTEM SIGNING.

    (a) No Federal funds may be expended to construct, erect, or 
otherwise place any sign relating to any speed limit, any distance, or 
any other measurement, on any highway if such sign establishes such 
speed limit, distance, or other measurement solely using the metric 
system.
    (b) No Federal funds may be expended to modify any sign relating to 
any speed limit, any distance, or any other measurement on any highway 
for the conversion of such sign solely to the metric system.
    (c) For purposes of subsections (a) and (b)--
            (1) the term ``highway'' means a highway as defined in 
        section 101 of title 23, United States Code; and
            (2) the term ``metric system'' means metric system of 
        measurement as defined in section 4 of the Metric Conversion 
        Act of 1975 (15 U.S.C. 205c).

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 46022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19631]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 16, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(202) 317-4110.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, October 16, 
2018, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is 
invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for 
consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent 
to participate must be made with Antoinette Ross. For more information 
please contact: Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-4110, or 
write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Room 1509, National 
Office, Washington, DC 20224, or contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The committee will be discussing various issues related to Taxpayer 
Communications and public input is welcome.

    Dated: September 1, 2018.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2018-19631 Filed 9-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David R. Challis, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), rendered January 22, 1990, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial (Pano Patsalos, J.), after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement officials and a blood test result.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Orange County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The hearing court properly concluded that the defendant was not in police custody at the scene of the accident or at the hospital prior to his arrest. The record reveals that at the scene of the accident, a police officer requested that the defendant sit in the back of his patrol car for the defendant’s safety. The officer neither handcuffed the defendant nor did he *553even close the door of the patrol car. In fact, subsequent to being placed in the back of the patrol car, the defendant was seen wandering around outside the patrol car. Overall, it is clear that the police officer’s conduct at the scene of the accident did not restrain the defendant’s freedom of movement to the degree associated with a formal arrest *(see, People v Coates,*157 AD2d 843). A reasonable person in the defendant’s position and innocent of any crime would not have considered himself in custody at the time *(see, People v Yukl,*25 NY2d 585, *cert denied*400 US 851; *People v Bailey,*140 AD2d 356, 358). Under the circumstances, the defendant’s statements made at the scene were properly not suppressed. With regard to the defendant’s statements made at the hospital, the record reveals that the questioning of the defendant by the police at the hospital was not a custodial interrogation *(see, People v Hennigan,*135 AD2d 1082).

The defendant also contends that the results of his blood test should have been suppressed since the People failed to establish that he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his rights. We disagree. The record reveals that the defendant was coherent at the hospital and that he had only suffered a relatively small head injury. In fact, he was released from the hospital after only a few hours of observation and treatment. Furthermore, immediately prior to the taking of the blood sample, the defendant stated: "I just want to let you know that I am doing this totally voluntarily”. As such, it is clear that the defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily consented to the taking of the blood sample *(see, People v Osburn,*155 AD2d 926).

Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Brown, J. P., Kooper, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 07-7296 

JIMMY DUNCAN, a/k/a Jimmy L. Duncan,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

N. GORDON, Sergeant, Lee Correctional

Institution; JANE DOE, a/k/a NFN Slade, Nurse,

Lee Correctional Institution; JANE DOE, a/k/a

NFN Robinson, Nurse, Lee Correctional

Institution; OFFICER ANDERSON, NFN, Lee

Correctional Institution; OFFICER DUBOSE, NFN,

Lee Correctional Institution; OFFICER BRUNSON,

NFN, Lee Correctional Institution; SERGEANT

ROBERTS, a/k/a NFN Robertson, NFN, Lee

Correctional Institution,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(8:06-cv-00396-MBS)

Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 28, 2007

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

Jimmy Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. John Evans James, III, LEE, ERTER,

WILSON, JAMES, HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Duncan appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, and a subsequent order

denying his motion to alter or amend judgment and motion to stay.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Duncan v. Gordon, No. 8:06-cv-00396-MBS (D.S.C. Mar. 29,

2007; filed July 11, 2007 & entered July 12, 2007). We further

deny Duncan’s motions to authorize preparation of transcript at

government expense and for default judgment. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED