alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.34 MB)

Tags:EAP

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 10.7



A.T. Cross Company

Omnibus Incentive Plan

On April 23, 1998 the shareholders adopted the Company's Omnibus Incentive Plan
(the "OI Plan") which replaced the Company's Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan and
Incentive Stock Option Plan.  The OI Plan permits the Compensation Committee to
grant various long-term incentive awards, generally equity based, to officers
and key employees from one pool of reserved shares.  The OI Plan provides for
grants of awards, including but not limited to, Incentive Stock Options, at not
less than the full market value on the date of grant (except in the case of a
shareholder possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all
classes of Company stock, in which case the exercise price shall be not less
than 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant) and Non-Qualified Stock
Options, at an exercise price determined by the Compensation Committee; Stock
Appreciation Rights, which are rights to receive an amount equal to the
increase, between the date of grant and the date of exercise, in the fair market
value of the number of shares of common stock subject to the Stock Appreciation
Right; shares of Restricted Stock, which are common shares which have certain
conditions attached to them which must be satisfied in order to have
unencumbered rights to the Restricted Stock; and Performance Awards, which are
awards in common shares or cash.  The OI Plan has no definite expiration date,
but may be terminated by the Board of Directors; however, no Incentive Stock
Options shall be granted for a term longer than ten years from the date of grant
(five years in the case of a shareholder possessing more than 10% of the total
combined voting power of all classes of Company stock).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7039
KENNETH DELBRIDGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STEPHEN M. DEWALT, Warden, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (CA-05-1487-1-BEL) Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 28, 2006 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Delbridge, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kenneth Delbridge, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Delbridge v. Dewalt , No. CA-05-1487-1-BEL (D. Md. June 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 250 (Monday, December 31, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 77178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31440]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8136]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Pre-Raphaelites: Victorian Art and Design, 1848-
1900''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Pre-Raphaelites: Victorian Art and Design, 
1848-1900,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on or about February 
17, 2013, until on or about May 19, 2013, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: December 21, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-31440 Filed 12-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY HUMAN STUDIES REVIEW BOARD (HSRB) PUBLIC TELECONFERENCE MEETING Thursday, September 9, 2010 1 : 3 0 pm - 3 :00 pm (Eastern Time) * HSRB MEETING FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF DRAFT JUNE 2 3, 2010 HSRB MEETING REPORT HS RB WEB SITE http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/ Docket Telephone: (202) 566 1752 Docket Number: EP A

–HQ –ORD–2010–0 617 Meeting l ocation via telephone only Dial in number 86 6 - 299 - 3188; conference code 202 564 7189 

### 1 : 3 0 P M Convene Meeting and Identification of Board Members

– Jim

Downing (Designated Federal Officer, HSRB, OSA, EPA) 1 : 4 0 P M Meeting Administrative Procedures

– Jim Downing, DFO 1 : 4 5 P M Meeting Process – Sean Philpot , Ph.D. (HSRB Chair) 1 : 5 0 P M Public Comment s 2 : 0 0 P M Board Discussion and Decision on Fina l Report – Sean Philpot , Ph.D.

(HSRB Chair) The Board’s response to EPA charge questions presented at the June 23, 2010 meeting. Completed Carroll- Loye Biological Research, Inc. Study LNX- 002: Field Repellency of Two Picaridin - Based Personal Insect Repellents to Black Flies Charge to the Board: 1. Is the CLBR study LNX - 002 sufficiently sound, from a scientific perspective, to be used to estimate the duration of complete protection against black flies provided by the tested repellents? 2. Does avail able information support a determination that study LNX - 002 was conducted in substantial compliance with subparts K and L 40 CFR Part 26? Completed Carroll- Loye Biological Research, Inc. Study LNX- 003: Laboratory Repellency of Two Picaridin - Based Persona l Insect Repellents to Two Species of Ticks Charge to the Board: 1. Is the CLBR study LNX - 003 sufficiently sound, from a scientific perspective, to be used to estimate the duration of complete protection against ticks provided by the tested repellents? 2. Does available information support a determination that study LNX - 003 was conducted in substantial compliance with subparts K and L 40 CFR Part 26?2

Revised Product Performance Test Guidelines for Insect Repellents to be Applied to Human Skin 

### The Board recommended several changes or clarifications, including:

• Removal of the maximum - likelihood method requirement in the data analy sis section; • Clarification of recommendations regarding the use of positive controls, particularly with respect to the number of controls and the rationale for including them in the study ; • Careful consideration of recommendations regarding the recruitment and inclusion of so - called ‘vulnerable’ populations, including racial and ethnic minorities; and • Encouraging the use of s tudy designs that will enable investigators to collect data that will allow quantitative measurement of the repellent efficacy during the complete protection period. 2 : 5 5 P M Summary and Next Steps – Sean Philpot , Ph.D. (HSRB Chair) and Jim

Downing ( DFO ) 3 :00 P M Adjournment * Please be advised that agenda times are approximate. For further information, please contact the Designated Federal Officer for this meeting, Jim Downing via telephone: (202) 564 - 2468 or email: downing.jim @epa.gov
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2011 of Wellness Center USA, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew J. Kandalepas, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, Principal Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  Date:  February 15, 2011/s/ Andrew J. KandalepasName:  Andrew J. KandalepasTitle: Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, Principal Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
#### Nathan Addison LENTZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. O-90-0603.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Feb. 14, 1991.

*662ORDER

Appellant was convicted of Possession of Stolen Vehicle, After Former Conviction of One Felony, and was sentenced September 23, 1985, to a five (5) year term with said time suspended, thereby subjecting the Appellant to probation, in Case No. CRF-85-2308 in the District Court of Tulsa County. Appellant’s suspended sentence was revoked December 6, 1989, by the Honorable Clifford E. Hopper. The Appellant has appealed the revocation of his suspended sentence to this Court alleging the revocation hearing was not held within twenty (20) days of the Appellant’s arrest as required by 22 O.S.1981, § 991b, and that insufficient evidence existed to support revocation because the judgment and sentences used as the basis to revoke were not proved to be final.

Pursuant to 22 O.S.Supp.1990, Ch. 18, App., *Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals,*Rule 11.2, this appeal was automatically assigned to the Accelerated Docket of this Court. The propositions or issues were presented to this Court in oral argument February 7, 1991, pursuant to Rule 11.5(c). At the conclusion of oral argument, the parties were advised of the decision of this Court.

The language of § 991b is very clear. The revocation hearing shall be held within twenty (20) days from the date of arrest. The arrest mentioned in the statute refers to the arrest for the probation violation, and not the arrest for the criminal offense which serves as the basis for the probation revocation. *Fields v. State,*640 P.2d 990 (Okl.Cr.1982). In the case before this Court, the hearing was not scheduled to be held within twenty (20) days from the date of Appellant’s arrest for the probation violation.

Furthermore, at the revocation hearing the State failed to prove the finality of the judgment and sentences used as the basis for revocation. This Court has held that when the State chooses to prove a judgment and sentence rather than the underlying crime as a predicate for revocation of a suspended sentence, it must offer strict proof of the finality of the predicate judgment and sentence. *Pickens v. State,*779 P.2d 596 (Okl.Cr.1989). In this case the State called Appellant to testify and elicited from him the fact that he had entered a plea of guilty to the alleged subsequent crimes. There was no evidence produced to show that Appellant had failed to attempt to withdraw pleas or appeal the convictions.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT, by a four to zero vote, that the order of the District Court of Tulsa County revoking the suspended sentence of Appellant in Case No. CRF-85-2308, should be, and the same hereby is, REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions to DISMISS. Appellant’s five year suspended sentence expired September 23, 1990.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ James F. Lane JAMES F. LANE, Presiding Judge

/s/ Tom Brett TOM BRETT, Judge

/s/ Ed Parks ED PARKS, Judge

/s/ Charles A. Johnson CHARLES A. JOHNSON, Judge
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05052**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  05052\05052_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 05052\05052_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05052\05052_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05052\05052_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05052\05052_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05052\05052_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05052\05052 Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 05052\Supporting Documents\05052 A5-2 Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05052\Supporting Documents\05052 A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05052\Supporting Documents\05052 D3-1 pond-1 D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05052\Supporting Documents\05052 D3-1 pond-2 D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05052\Supporting Documents\05052 D3-1 pond-3 D-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05052\Supporting Documents\05052 I2-7 2009 Form 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 05052\Supporting Documents\05052 Submittal Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05052\05052_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05052\05052_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 10.27

 

JANUS CAPITAL GROUP INC.

 

OUTSIDE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM (1)

 

	
Annual Board cash retainer
    	
 
    	
$
    	
 80,000
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Annual Board stock retainer grant
    	
 
    	
$
    	
80,000
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
3-year vesting
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Annual Committee cash retainer (per Committee)
    	
 
    	
$
    	
8,000
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Additional annual cash retainer for Audit   Committee Chair
    	
 
    	
$
    	
20,000
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Additional annual cash retainer for Compensation   Committee Chair,
   Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair and
   Planning and Strategy Committee Chair
    	
 
    	
$
    	
12,000
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Non-Executive Chairman: additional annual cash   retainer (payable in equal quarterly installments)
    	
 
    	
$
    	
125,000
    	
(2)
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
One-time restricted stock grant upon joining Board
    	
 
    	
$
    	
80,000
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
3-year vesting
    	
 
    


 




Notes:

 

(1)         All amounts are subject to proration if director joins after commencement of fiscal year (fiscal year begins on date of Annual Shareholders’ Meeting).  All compensation may be deferred at the election of a director under the Company’s Directors Deferred Fee Plan.  Equity awards are deferred in the form of restricted stock units.

 

(2)         The Non-Executive Chairman additional cash retainer was reduced by 50% in the October 2012 Compensation Committee.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Empeiria Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joseph Fong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: July 27, 2011
/s/ Joseph FongJoseph Fong

Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President

(Principal financial and accounting officer)
HP Nanum Pigment Process Flow Diagram, Part 2

(Filling of Ink Containers)
#### The STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Petitioner, v. Tom Z. WRIGHT et al., Respondents. The STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Petitioner, v. Ray Dean LINDER, District Judge In and For Woodward County, State of Oklahoma, Respondent.

Nos. 78963, 78964, 78969 and 78963.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 5, 1992.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 1, 1992.

ORDER

Original jurisdiction is assumed. Cause No. 78,969 is consolidated under the surviving number Cause No. 78,963 (consolidated with No. 78,964). Writ of mandamus issue, requiring respondent, Ray Dean Linder, Judge of the District Court of Woodward County, or any other assigned judge to proceed with a jury trial in Cause No. C-90-57 and Cause No. C-90-58 on the docket of Woodward County. The demand for jury trial filed by State of Oklahoma ex-rel. Department of Transportation was in writing and complies with 69 O.S.1991 § 1203. The trial court was without power to entertain, act upon, or render a default judgment or summary judgment. Condemnation proceedings are special proceedings. Only the trial and the judgment resulting therefrom is to be conducted in the same manner as civil actions in the district court. 69 O.S.1991 § 1203(e)(1). Summary judgment is not available. The condemnation actions must proceed to trial by a jury.

HODGES, V.C.J., LAVENDER, SIMMS and ALMA WILSON, JJ., and LUMPKIN, S.J., concur.

OP ALA, C.J., and HARGRAVE, KAUGER and SUMMERS, JJ., dissent.

OPALA, Chief Justice,

with whom HARGRAVE, KAUGER and SUMMERS, Justices, join, dissenting.

I would deny the application to assume original jurisdiction and relegate petitioner to its appellate remedy.

GARY L. LUMPKIN, S.J., sitting by designation to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of DOOLIN, J., effective May 1, 1992.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 170 (Friday, August 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 44615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18943]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-2305-000]


Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing 
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization; Bobilli BSS, 
LLC

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding 
Bobilli BSS, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 17, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e3a5a6b1a0ac8d8f8a8d86b09693938c9197a385869180cd848c95"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="763033243539181a1f181325030606190402361013041558111900">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: August 27, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-18943 Filed 8-30-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>