alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3(i).4

                    ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                OF

                         FLEXPOINT, INC.

     The undersigned natural person, being at least eighteen years of age,
acting as incorporator of a corporation under the Utah Revised Business
Corporation Act adopts the following Articles of Incorporation for such
corporation:
                            ARTICLE I

     The name of this corporation is Flexpoint, Inc.

                            ARTICLE II

     The corporation is organized to engage in any lawful acts, activities and
pursuits for which a corporation may be organized under the Utah Revised
Business Corporation Act.

                           ARTICLE III

     The number of shares of Common Stock that this corporation is authorized
to issue is One Hundred Thousand (100,000).  The Common Stock shall have
unlimited voting rights as provided in the Utah Revised Business Corporation
Act and shall be entitled to receive the net assets of the corporation upon
dissolution.
                            ARTICLE IV

     The street address of the initial registered office of the corporation is
47 East 7200 South, Suite 201, Midvale, Utah  84047.  The name of the
corporation's initial registered agent at that office is Jules A. deGreef.

                            ARTICLE VI

     To the fullest extent permitted by the Utah Revised Business Corporation
Act or any other applicable law as now in effect or as it may hereafter be
amended, a director of this corporation shall not be personally liable to the
corporation or its shareholders for monetary damages for any action taken or
any failure to take any action, as a director.

     The corporation shall indemnify to the full extent permitted by law any
person who is made, or threatened to be made, a party to any action, suit or
proceeding (whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative) by
reason of the fact he or she, his or her testator or intestate is or was a
director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation or serves or served
any other enterprise at the request of the corporation.

                           ARTICLE VII

     The name and address of the incorporator is:

                  Michael Gilano
                  223 Marsala
                  Newport Beach, California  92660

     DATED this 5 day of January, 1995.





                                    /s/ Michael Gilano
                                    ----------------------------
                                    Michael Gilano
                                    Incorporator

     The undersigned hereby accepts and acknowledges appointment as the
initial registered agent of the corporation named above, and confirms that the
undersigned meets the requirements of Section 501 of the Utah Revised Business
Corporation Act.

                                   /s/ Jules A. deGreef
                                   ------------------------------
                                       Jules A. deGreef
                                       Registered Agent
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6238

STANFORD EL CHRISTOPHER MCPHERSON, JR., a/k/a

Chris Rattis,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

J. HAYNES, Administrator,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,

District Judge. (5:05-hc-00820-D)

Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 21, 2007

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanford El Christopher McPherson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mary

Carla Hollis, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Stanford El Christopher McPherson, Jr., seeks to appeal

the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that McPherson has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidus Investment Corporation (the Company) for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward H. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Shelby E. Sherard, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                             
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: November 2, 2017 |  | /s/ EDWARD H. ROSS                          
|                       |  | Edward H. Ross                              
|                       |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer        
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                       | 
|                       |  | /s/ SHELBY E. SHERARD                       
|                       |  | Shelby E. Sherard                           
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                       |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.24 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, DLA Distribution Norfolk, dla, AWARDS, People and Culture, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 10.13 Access Roadway Improvements Contractor Agreement dated June 1, 2015 between E. M. Rivera & Sons, Inc. and Aina Le'a, Inc.






    	 	 -1-	 



    


    



    	 	 -2-	 



    


    



    	 	 -3-	 



    


    



    	 	 -4-	 



    


    



    	 	 -5-	 



    


    



    	 	 -6-	 



    


    



    	 	 -7-	 



    


        



    	 	 -8-	 



    


    



    	 	 -9-	 



    


    



    	 	 -10-	 



    


    



    	 	 -11-	 



    


    



    	 	 -12-	 



    


    



    	 	 -13-	 



    


    



    	 	 -14-	 



    


    



    	 	 -15-	 



    


    



    	 	 -16-	 



    


    



    	 	 -17-	 



    


    



    	 	 -18-	 



    


    



    	 	 -19-	 



    


    



    	 	 -20-	 



    


    



    	 	 -21-	 



    


    



    	 	 -22-	 



    


    



    	 	 -23-	 



    


    



    	 	 -24-	 



    


    



    	 	 -25-	 



    


    



    	 	 -26-	 



    


    



    	 	 -27-	 



    


    



    	 	 -28-	 



    


    



    	 	 -29-	 



    


    



    	 	 -30-	 



    


    



    	 	 -31-	 



    


    



    	 	 -32-	 



    


    



    	 	 -33-
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO 

UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC. 

PROFIT SHARING PLAN 

WHEREAS, United Continental Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) sponsors the United Continental Holdings, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (as
amended and restated effective January 1, 2014, except as otherwise provided therein, and as previously amended by the First Amendment thereto) (the “Plan”); 

WHEREAS, Appendix B of the Plan sets forth the Factors to be used for each Participating Employee Group to determine Awards under Section
III.B.3 of the Plan; 
 WHEREAS, the First Amendment was previously adopted to amend the Factors to implement certain requirements of
collective bargaining agreements with certain of the Company’s union represented Participating Employee Groups; 
 WHEREAS, the Company
desires to amend the Plan to modify the Factors used for each of the non-union Participating Employee Groups (referred to collectively in the Plan as the “Management and Administrative Employee Group,” but in some cases separately listed
in Appendix B) to provide terms similar to those provided to certain of the union represented Participating Employee Groups; 
 WHEREAS,
Section V.A reserves to the Company the right to amend the Plan in its sole discretion; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has approved
the following amendment; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective January 1, 2015, for the 2015 Plan year and thereafter
by changing the Non-Union portion of Appendix B to read as follows: 
  

													
	 Non-Union
	  	Union
Representation	  	Group Code	  	Factor for Base
Percentage A	 	  	Factor for Base
Percentage B	 
	 FQM (Flight Qualified Management)
	  	None	  	FMT	  	 	5	  	  	 	10	  
	 Chelsea Food Service
	  	None	  	FS	  	 	5	  	  	 	10	  
	 Management & Administrative
	  	None	  	SAL, MGT,
OFC,SIA, SLS	  	 	5	  	  	 	10	  
	 Test Pilots
	  	None	  	TPT	  	 	5	  	  	 	10	  

 *    *    *    *    * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed on its behalf this 30th
day of December, 2015. 
  

	
	UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC.
	
	 /s/ Michael P. Bonds

	Michael P. Bonds
	Executive Vice President,
	Human Resources and Labor Relations



  
 2
EX-10.14.1 2013 10-K


EXHIBIT 10.14.1


Schedule identifying substantially identical agreements, between Visteon Corporation ("Visteon") and each of the persons named below, to the Officer Change in Control Agreement constituting Exhibit 10.14 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Visteon for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.




	
	
	Name

	Jeffrey M. Stafeil

	Martin T. Thall

	Michael K. Sharnas

	Michael J. Widgren
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
The Board of Directors
Trigen Energy Corporation
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No.
333-4198 on Form S-3 and No. 33-83736 and No. 33-92468 on Form S-8 of Trigen
Energy Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated March 24, 1997, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Trigen Energy Corporation and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 1996, and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1996, and the related schedules, which
report appears in the December 31, 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trigen
Energy Corporation. Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers
to a change in accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets in 1995.
 
                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Stamford, CT
March 24, 1997
SmytheRatcliffe CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   The Board of Directors Reg Technologies Inc.   We consent to the inclusion in the Form 20-F/A of our report dated August 22, 2008, except for Note 12 which is as of November 13, 2009 on the consolidated financial statements of loss and comprehensive loss, shareholders equity and cash flows of Reg Technologies Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2008.  Smythe Ratcliffe LLP (signed)  Chartered Accountants  Vancouver, Canada March 14, 2011


|                                                                                             |  |                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|                                                                                             |  | 7th Floor, 355 Burrard St.
|                                                                                             |  | Vancouver, BC  V6C 2G8    
|                                                                                             |  |                           
|                                                                                             |  | Tel:  604 687 1231        
|Smythe Ratcliffe LLP is a member of PKF International Limited and PKF North American Network |  | Fax:  604 688 4675        
|which are two separate associations of legally independent member firms                      |  | smytheratcliffe.com
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6883
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES EDDIE PALMER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-93-90-N) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 25, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Eddie Palmer, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying hisrequest for a copy of his sentencing transcript at government expense and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Palmer , No. CR-93-90-N (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 1996; May 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 21.01**

 

**List ofSubsidiaries**

 
| ** ** | ** ** | **Subsidiary**                                                                                                             | ** ** | **State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation  or Organization** |
|------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|       |       |                                                                                                                       |       |                                                        |
| 1.         |       | bmd wireless AG                                                                                                            |       | Switzerland                                                 |
| 2.         |       | Intrado Communications Inc.                                                                                                |       | Delaware                                                    |
| 3.         |       | Intrado Communications of Virginia Inc., a  wholly owned subsidiary of Intrado Communications Inc.                         |       | Virginia                                                    |
| 4.         |       | Intrado International Ltd.                                                                                                 |       | Ireland                                                     |
| 5.         |       | Intrado International Singapore Pte. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary  of Intrado International Ltd.                        |       | Singapore                                                   |
| 6.         |       | Intrado (XieAn) Technology (China) Co. Ltd., a 49%-owned Sino-foreign  joint venture company of Intrado International Ltd. |       | China                                                       |

 

----
#### Carl Gifaldi et al., Appellants, v Dumont Co., Inc., Doing Business as Dumont Chemical Company, et al., Defendants, Jefferson Chemical Company et al., Respondents, and Interstate Tire Company, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 3.)

Appeal from order insofar as it denied reargument unanimously dismissed; order otherwise affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in *Gifaldi v Dumont Co.,*([appeal No. 1] 172 *1027AD2d 1025 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.—Renewal/Reargument.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.98 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, dla, Warfighter First, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery