alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00639

- CV

Paul COOK , et al

. , Appellant s

v.

CHICAGO TITLE OF TEXAS LLC

, Appellee

From the County Court a t Law No. 10

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CV01277

Honorable J

. Frank Davis , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to pay the filing fee

. Costs of this appeal are taxed against app ellant.

SIGNED December 7, 2022.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
J

- S1200 8

- 15

* Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court. NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v.

EDWARD ZEIGLER Appellant No. 2248 EDA 2013

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence May 2 , 2013 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 51

- CR

- 0001450

- 2012

BEFORE: BOWES, SHOGAN AND FITZGERALD,* JJ.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY BOWES, J.: FILED JUNE 15, 2015 Edward Zeigler appeals from the judgment of sentence seven to fourteen years incarceration to be followed by ten years probation imposed by the trial court after he pled guilty to aggra vated assault and persons not to possess a firearm. Counsel has filed a petition to withdraw from representation and a supplemental brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Commonwealth v. Santiago , 978 A.2d 349 (Pa. 2009), after w e declined to permit him to withdraw and directed him to address an issue pertaining to Appellant’s prior juvenile record. We now affirm and grant counsel’s petition to withdraw. We outlined the facts of this matter and legal requirements for an

Anders w ithdrawal in our prior opinion. See Commonwealth v. Zeigler ,J

- S12008

- 15

- 2

-

112 A.3d 656 (Pa.Super. 2015). Accordingly, we need not repeat them. We add only that counsel has notified Appellant via letter of his filing of the supplemental brief and provided that brief to Appellant. Further, the Commonwealth has filed a supplemental brief agreeing with counsel’s

assessment. We previously addressed Appellant’s claims in his original Anders brief and determined that they were frivolous. However, we remanded this matter to address whether Appellant’s prior commission of a robbery as a juvenile resulted in an adult conviction or a juvenile adjudication. Counsel has supplied the court with th e presentence report that was considered by the court, and Appellant’s FBI criminal extract, both of which confirm that Appellant was convicted as an adult and that he served two to six years incarceration. Thus, he submits that Appellant’s sentence for p ersons not to possess a firearm was legal. Our review of the presentence report considered by the trial court demonstrates that Appellant was not adjudicated delinquent, but convicted of a crime. Accordingly, he was lawfully sentenced. See Zeigler , supr a (discussing legality of sentence issue relative to persons not to possess a firearm). In sum, after our independent review and for reasons discussed in our prior published opinion as well as this memorandum, we agree with counsel that Appellant’s appeal is wholly frivolous. Therefore, we affirm and grant counsel’s petition to withdraw.J

- S12008

- 15

- 3

-

Judgment of sentence affirmed. Todd Mosser, Esq.’s petition to withdraw granted. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 6/15/2015
<PAGE>
                                                                Exhibit 11.1
                              SUMMIT DESIGN, INC.

                      STATEMENTS REGARDING COMPUTATION
                       OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                   (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                  Years Ended December 31,
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  1996       1995       1994
<S>                                               <C>        <C>        <C>
Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding                                      11,598     1,873     1,843
Common stock equivalents arising
 from stock options (1)                              774       924       924
Convertible preferred shares (2)                     -       9,103     9,103
                                                 -------   -------   -------
                                                  12,372    11,900    11,870


Net income (loss)                                $ 2,676   $(3,151)  $(2,046)
                                                 -------   --------  --------
                                                 -------   --------  --------
Net income (loss per share                       $  0.22   $ (0.26)  $ (0.17)
                                                 -------   --------  --------
                                                 -------   --------  --------

</TABLE>

(1) Assumes exercise of all outstanding options and options issued within one
    year of the date of the initial public offering which options are
    considered exercised in all periods presented prior to the initial public
    offering.
(2) Assumes conversion of all preferred shares outstanding as of the date of
    the filing of the initial public offering which shares are considered
    outstanding for all periods presented.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Hewitt, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohn, J.), rendered April 7, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Brown, Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
EXIBIT 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Sector 10, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Pericles DeAvila, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:  /s/ Pericles DeAvila




Name: Pericles DeAvila


Principal Executive Officer




July 21, 2010





---
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO ANDCFO PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. § 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Form 10-K/A of SNB Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report)”, H. Averett Walker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James R. McLemore, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

|   |   |   |                                                          |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ H. Averett Walker                                         |
|   |   |   |                                                               |
|   |   |   | **H. AVERETT WALKER****Chief Executive Officer**April 9, 2003 |

 

|   |   |   |                                                                        |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ James R. McLemore                                                       |
|   |   |   |                                                                             |
|   |   |   | **JAMES R. McLEMORE****Chief Financial and Accounting Officer**April 9,2003 |

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.05 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, Expeditianary, dla, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (the Report) of GSV Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, William Tanona, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ William TanonaName: William TanonaDate:  May 10, 2017
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.02 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, dla, AWARDS, People and Culture, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
##### 



UNITED STATES
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
 Amendment
No. 1
  þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
 EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  OR
 o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For
the transition period from ____ to ____

Commission File Number: 000-22125
 Diamond
Management & Technology Consultants, Inc.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization) 
875 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 3000
Chicago, Illinois
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    36-4069408
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
60611
(Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code: (312) 255-5000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
 Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
Nasdaq Global Market
 þ o
 þ o
 o þ o
 o þ
   DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY NOTE
   (3) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
  2005
    
    
    2006Unrealized gain on investment
    
    $
    120
    
    
    $
    105Foreign currency translation adjustments
    
    
    2,540
    
    
    
    2,368Accumulated other comprehensive income
    
    $
    2,660
    
    
    $
    2,473
 2




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 1 to the
Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
 Diamond
Management
& Technology Consultants, Inc.By:
    /s/ Adam J. GutsteinAdam J. GutsteinChief Executive OfficerDate: November 21, 2006 3
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Ruben Azrak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer of Excel Corporation, (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Excel Corporation and will be retained by Excel Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:  August 20, 2012



|/s/ Ruben Azrak              | 
|---------------------------- | 
|Chief Executive Officer and  | 
|Principal Accounting Officer |
Exhibit
13.1



Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to

Title
18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I,
Paul Chute, Chief Executive Officer of Reg Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The
    Annual Report on Form 20-F of Reg Technologies Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2018 (the “Report”) fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of Reg Technologies Inc.                                                                                   



|Date: November 1, 2018 | /s/
    “Paul Chute”         
|---------------------- | -----------------------------
|                       | Paul
    Chute               
|                       | (Chief
    Executive Officer)



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reg Technologies Inc. and will be retained
by Reg Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted June 23, 2009

Decided August 18, 2009

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

No. 08-4209

LAWRENCE STEVENS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

HELEN J. MARBERRY,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Southern District of Indiana,

Terre Haute Division.

No. 2:08-cv-00375-WTL-TAB

William T. Lawrence,

Judge.

O R D E R

Lawrence Stevens is serving a sentence of life imprisonment for drug and firearm

offenses. He appealed, and we affirmed his conviction. United States v. Stevens, 380 F.3d

1021, 1023 (7th Cir. 2004). He filed a motion to vacate the judgment, see 28 U.S.C. § 2255,

which was denied in 2007. 

Stevens also filed a civil case against the government, arguing that certain property

which was seized from him in the course of the criminal investigation should be returned. 

See United States v. Stevens, 500 F.3d 625 (7th Cir. 2007). Included in that property was

nearly $50,000 in cash. According to Stevens, during the civil case the government

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

 Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 08-4209 Page 2

admitted that the money was stolen from a credit union, even though, he says, the money

was used in his criminal case as evidence that he was trafficking drugs.

This discrepancy prompted Stevens to file an application pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(b)(3), seeking authorization to file a second or successive motion to vacate. He

argued that the purportedly inconsistent positions taken by the prosecutor entitled him to

file another § 2255 petition. We denied his application both because the prosecutor’s

positions were not inconsistent and because there was still ample evidence of his guilt of

drug trafficking, so a reasonable fact-finder would still have found him guilty. See

§ 2244(b)(2); Stevens v. United States, No. 08-2312 (7th Cir. June 16, 2008).

Stevens next filed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in which he presented the

same argument. He argued that § 2255 was inadequate to test the legality of his detention

because he could not satisfy the standards for authorization and thus he could persue the

claim in a § 2241 petition. The district court concluded that Stevens’s arguments could

have been and were raised in his prior § 2255 petition and in his § 2244(b)(3) application. 

Accordingly, it dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Stevens argues that the

district court should not have dismissed his case, because, he says, he has no other means

of challenging his conviction. But he did have another means of challenging his conviction,

through seeking permission to file a successive collateral attack. We denied that

permission, and he cannot use § 2241 as a means to circumvent the bar on successive § 2255

petitions because he is unhappy with that result. See In re Davenport, 147 F.3d 605, 609 (7th

Cir. 1998).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Stevens’s motion for

appointment of counsel is DENIED.